Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 03082016 - Comp Min PktCALENDAR FOR THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CONTRA COSTA COUNTY AND FOR SPECIAL DISTRICTS, AGENCIES, AND AUTHORITIES GOVERNED BY THE BOARD BOARD CHAMBERS ROOM 107, ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, 651 PINE STREET MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA 94553-1229 CANDACE ANDERSEN, CHAIR, 2ND DISTRICT MARY N. PIEPHO, VICE CHAIR, 3RD DISTRICT JOHN GIOIA, 1ST DISTRICT KAREN MITCHOFF, 4TH DISTRICT FEDERAL D. GLOVER, 5TH DISTRICT DAVID J. TWA, CLERK OF THE BOARD AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR, (925) 335-1900 PERSONS WHO WISH TO ADDRESS THE BOARD DURING PUBLIC COMMENT OR WITH RESPECT TO AN ITEM THAT IS ON THE AGENDA, MAY BE LIMITED TO TWO (2) MINUTES. A LUNCH BREAK MAY BE CALLED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE BOARD CHAIR. The Board of Supervisors respects your time, and every attempt is made to accurately estimate when an item may be heard by the Board. All times specified for items on the Board of Supervisors agenda are approximate. Items may be heard later than indicated depending on the business of the day. Your patience is appreciated. ANNOTATED AGENDA & MINUTES March 8, 2016                  9:00 A.M. Convene and announce adjournment to closed session in Room 101. Closed Session Agenda A. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS 1. Agency Negotiators: David Twa and Bruce Heid. Employee Organizations: Contra Costa County Employees’ Assn., Local No. 1; Am. Fed., State, County, & Mun. Empl., Locals 512 and 2700; Calif. Nurses Assn.; Service Empl. Int’l Union, Local1021; District Attorney’s Investigators Assn.; Deputy Sheriffs Assn.; United Prof. Firefighters, Local 1230; Physicians’ & Dentists’ Org. of Contra Costa; Western Council of Engineers; United Chief Officers Assn.; Service Empl. Int’l Union United Health Care Workers West; Contra Costa County Defenders Assn.; Probation Peace Officers Assn. of Contra Costa County; Contra Costa County Deputy District Attorneys’ Assn.; and Prof. & Tech. Engineers, Local 21, AFL-CIO; Teamsters Local 856. 2. Agency Negotiators: David Twa. Unrepresented Employees: All unrepresented employees. B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL--EXISTING LITIGATION (Gov. Code, § 54956.9(d)(1)) Retiree Support Group of Contra Costa County v. Contra Costa County, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, Case No. C12-00944 JST C. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL--ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Gov. Code, § 54956.9(d)(2): one potential case D. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS Property: 1700 Oak Park Blvd., Pleasant Hill Agency Negotiator: Karen Laws, Principal Real Property Agent Negotiating Parties: Contra Costa County and Pleasant Hill Recreation & Park District Under negotiation: Price and payment terms 9:30 a.m. Call to order and opening ceremonies.March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 1 9:30 a.m. Call to order and opening ceremonies. Inspirational Thought- “Spring is when you feel like whistling even with a shoe full of slush.” – Doug Larson Present: John Gioia, District I Supervisor; Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor; Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor; Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor; Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Staff Present:David Twa, County Administrator Sharon Anderson, County Counsel  There were no announcements from Closed Session.   CONSIDER CONSENT ITEMS (Items listed as C.1 through C.49 on the following agenda) – Items are subject to removal from Consent Calendar by request of any Supervisor or on request for discussion by a member of the public. Items removed from the Consent Calendar will be considered with the Discussion Items.   PRESENTATIONS (5 Minutes Each)   PRESENTATION honoring Chief Probation Officer Philip Kader on the occasion of his retirement from Contra Costa County. (David Twa, County Administrator)    AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover PRESENTATION honoring Joseph L. Campbell for his 25 years of service on the Contra Costa Water District Board of Directors. (Supervisor Mitchoff)    AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover PRESENTATION honoring County employees for their many years of service to Contra Costa County: Tracey Walker for her 25 years of service, to be presented by Obiel Leyva, Health Services Department Sergeant Terry DeCosta for her 30 years of service in the Animal Services Department, to be presented by Beth Ward, Animal Services Director     AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover PRESENTATION recognizing March 2016 as Prescription Drug Abuse Awareness Month. (Supervisor Andersen and Supervisor Piepho)    AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover PRESENTATION recognizing March 2016 as Grand Jury Month in Contra Costa County. (Supervisor Andersen)    AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover DISCUSSION ITEMS   D. 1 CONSIDER Consent Items previously removed.    Item C.17 was removed from the consent calendar to allow for staff to provide a PowerPoint presentation explaining the proposed placards for use by restaurants in Contra Costa County. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 2   D. 2 PUBLIC COMMENT (3 Minutes/Speaker)    Carol Weed, Clean Energy Alliance, encourage use and adoption of more renewable energy sources, available to everyone, not just those with solar panels. Ms. Weed urged support of a proposed County study to examine joining programs similar to Marin Clean Energy; and requested that should a study be approved that the advisory committee to the techical study include citizen representatives; Ralph Hofmann, Senior Mobility Action Council, advocated for alternative methods such as massage in place of ingesting pain killers, and noted that the number of fatalities of senior citizens in cross walks has dramatically increased. He advocated the wearing of bright clothing to reduce pedestrian fatalites; Andrew Galvan, the person designated the most likely descendent to Ohlone human remains in in North Richmond, requested assistance with ensuring workers on the property where the remains are located follow the guidelines provided to them while working on the site; Eli D., spoke on resources available to the public to research assistance for those who believe they have been falsely convicted of a crime; he further expressed concerns on the integrity of the Food and Drug Administration; Felix Huerta, Business Agent for Local 2700, spoke on Closed Session Item B: Retiree Support Group of Contra Costa County v. Contra Costa County, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, Case No. C12-00944 JST. He informed the Board that AFSCME never requested nor wanted inclusion in this matter, requested to be excluded from the agreement. Douglas Dunn, spoke on the implementation practices of Laura’s Law in regard to physicians being discouraged from making referrals to it; Teresa Pasquini spoke on the difficulties in receiving assistance from the Laura’s Law program (handout attached)   D.3 CONSIDER approving and authorizing the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Resource Development Associates, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $400,000 to provide consultation and technical assistance to the Department with regard to the County’s Assertive Community Treatment, for persons with serious mental illness who demonstrate resistance to voluntarily participating in services that have been offered, for the period November 16, 2015 through June 30, 2019. (100% State Mental Health Services Act) (Continued from March 1, 2016) (Cynthia Belon & Warren Hayes, Behavioral Health Services)       CONTINUED to March 29, 2016 for consideration inclusive of the new information requested.   D.4 RECEIVE update on the status of the Contra Costa Transportation Authority's development of a Transportation Expenditure Plan for a possible sales tax measure in 2016, including aspects related to the Urban Limit Line, and CONSIDER directing staff as appropriate. (John Cunningham, Conservation and Development Department)       ACCEPTED the report; and provided direction relative to the Urban Limit Line discussion.     AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover D.5 CONSIDER waiving the 180-day sit out period for Dr. Domenic Cavallaro, Exempt Medical Staff Dentist in the Health Services Department and approving and authorizing the hiring of Dr. Cavallero as a temporary County Employee for the period of April 1, 2016 through March 31, 2017, as recommended by the Health Services Department Director. (Dr. Samir Shah, Health Services Department)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover D.6 CONSIDER waiving the 180 day "sit out" period for Bobby Romero, former Supervising Accountant of the Property Tax division of the Office of the Auditor-Controller, and APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the hiring of County retiree Mr. Romero as a temporary County employee effective March 14 through September 30, 2016.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover D. 7 CONSIDER reports of Board members.    There were no items reported today. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 3  There were no items reported today.   Closed Session   ADJOURN   CONSENT ITEMS   Road and Transportation   C. 1 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute, on behalf of the County, Contract Amendment No. 1 to the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement/Contribution Agreement between East Contra Costa Regional Fee and Financing Authority and Contra Costa County for Phase 1 of the State Route 4 Bypass to increase the maximum reimbursement amount from $3.0 million to $3.35 million and extend the payment date from June 30, 2011 to June 30, 2020, East County area. (100% Proposition 1B Funds)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 2 AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to advertise for the 2016 On-Call Sweeping Services Contract(s) for Various Road Maintenance Work, for routine maintenance of existing road pavement, Countywide. (100% Local Road Funds)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Engineering Services   C. 3 ADOPT Resolution No. 2016/109 approving and authorizing the Public Works Director, or designee, to partially close a portion of Parker Avenue, eastbound lanes between San Pablo Avenue and 6th Street, on March 12, 2016 from 9:00 a.m. through 9:20 a.m., for the purpose of the Annual Little League Opening Day Parade, Rodeo area. (No fiscal impact)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 4 ADOPT Resolution No. 2016/107 accepting completion of warranty period for the Road Improvement Agreement and release of cash deposit for faithful performance for RA11-01247, a project developed by Shapell Homes, a Division of Shapell Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Danville area. (100% Developer Fees)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 5 ADOPT Resolution No. 2016/106 accepting completion of warranty period for the Subdivision Agreement and release of cash deposit for faithful performance, Subdivision SD06-09134, for a project developed by Shapell Homes, a Division of Shapell Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, as recommended by the Public Works Director, San Ramon (Dougherty Valley) area. (100% Developer Fees)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Special Districts & County Airports March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 4 Special Districts & County Airports   C. 6 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Chief Engineer, Flood Control & Water Conservation District, or designee, to execute, on behalf of the Contra Costa Clean Water Program, a contract amendment with Larry Walker Associates, Inc., to increase the payment limit by $62,843, to a new payment limit of $202,843, for general technical support services necessary to comply with federal and state stormwater rules contained in National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permits issued by the San Francisco Bay and Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Boards, Countywide. (100% Cities and County Stormwater Utility Fee Assessments)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 7 ADOPT Resolution No. 2016/105 establishing a rate of $30 per Equivalent Runoff Unit for Stormwater Utility Area 17 (Unincorporated County) for Fiscal Year 2016/2017 and requesting that the Contra Costa County Flood Control & Water Conservation District adopt annual parcel assessments for drainage maintenance and the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Program, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Countywide. (100% Stormwater Utility Area 17 Funds)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 8 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the conveyance of a portion of Contra Costa County Flood Control & Water Conservation District property to the City of Pinole and related actions under the California Environmental Quality Act; and ACCEPT a Grant of Easement from the City of Pinole for ingress and egress purposes, in accordance with Section 31 of the Contra Costa County Flood Control & Water Conservation District Act. (100% Flood Control Permit Fees)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Claims, Collections & Litigation   C. 9 DENY claims filed by Daniel Franklin, Karen McDuffie-Smith, Dennis Salopagio, and Darrell Sanders.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Honors & Proclamations   C. 10 ADOPT Resolution No. 2016/62 recognizing March 2016 as Grand Jury Month in Contra Costa County, as recommended by Supervisor Andersen.        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 11 ADOPT Resolution No. 2016/85 to recognize Tracey Walker for twenty-five years of service, as recommended by the Health Services Director.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 5  AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 12 ADOPT Resolution No. 2016/86 recognizing the contributions of Jann Edmunds on her 25 years of service to Contra Costa County, as recommended by the Public Works Director. (No fiscal impact)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 13 ADOPT Resolution No. 2016/93 to honor Sergeant Terry DeCosta for her thirty years of dedicated service in the Contra Costa County Animal Services Department, as recommended by the Animal Services Director.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 14 ADOPT Resolution No. 2016/97 recognizing March 2016 as Prescription Drug Abuse Awareness Month, as recommended by Supervisor Andersen and Supervisor Piepho.        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 15 ADOPT Resolution No. 2016/112 to honor Joseph L. Campbell for his 25 years of service on the Contra Costa Water District Board of Directors, as recommended by Supervisor Mitchoff.        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 16 ADOPT Resolution No. 2016/113 honoring Chief Probation Officer Philip Kader on the occasion of his retirement from Contra Costa County, as recommended by the County Administrator.        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Ordinances   C. 17 INTRODUCE Ordinance No. 2016-08, establishing an environmental health color-coded placard program for food facilities, WAIVE reading, and FIX March 15, 2016 for adoption, as recommended by the Health Services Director.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Appointments & Resignations   C. 18 ACCEPT the Resignation of Barbara Ward, DECLARE vacant the Consumer of Any Age, Seat 4 on the In-Home Supportive Services Public Authority Advisory Committee, and DIRECT the Clerk of the Board to post the vacancy, as recommended by the Employment and Human Services Department Director.        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 19 ACCEPT the resignation of Sharon Thygessen, DECLARE a vacancy in the Appointed Seat 2 on the El Sobrante Municipal Advisory Council, and DIRECT the Clerk of the Board to post the vacancy, as recommended by Supervisor Gioia.    March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 6     AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 20 ACCEPT resignation of Mike Smith, DECLARE vacant Seat B2 – American Heart Association on the Emergency Medical Care Committee and DIRECT the Clerk of the Board to post the vacancy as recommended by the Health Services Director.        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 21 APPOINT Susan Captain to the At Large #1, James Donnelly to the At Large #3, and Wayne Lanier, PhD, to the Public Member Alternate seats on the Integrated Pest Management Advisory Committee, as recommended by the Internal Operations Committee.        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 22 REAPPOINT Frank Gordon to the General Public seat, Tim Bancroft to the General Public Alternate seat, Jim Payne to the Labor #2 seat, and Tracy Scott to the Labor #2 Alternate seat, and REASSIGN Usha Vedagiri to the Environmental Organization #2 seat on the Hazardous Materials Commission; and DECLARE vacant the Environmental Organizations #3 Alternate seat held by Usha Vedagiri due to her reassignment to a regular seat and DIRECT the Clerk of the Board to post the vacancy, as recommended by the Internal Operations Committee.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 23 ACCEPT resignation of Uche Uwahemu, DECLARE a vacancy in the Economic Opportunity Council Private/Non-Profit Sector Seat No.5, and DIRECT the Clerk of the Board to post the vacancy, as recommended by the Employment & Human Services Director.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Intergovernmental Relations   C. 24 ADOPT a position of support on AB 1592 (Bonilla) Autonomous Vehicles: Pilot Project, a bill that authorizes the Contra Costa Transportation Authority to conduct a pilot project for the testing of autonomous vehicles under specified conditions, and AUTHORIZE the Chair of the Board of Supervisors to sign a letter communicating the Board's position, as recommended by the Transportation, Water, and Infrastructure Committee.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Personnel Actions   C. 25 ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 21834 to increase the hours of one Nutrition Assistant position from 12/40 to 24/40; one Therapist Aide position from 20/40 to 40/40; one Physical Therapist II position from 20/40 to 24/40; one Physical Therapist II position from 36/40 to 40/40; and one Senior Radiological Technician position from 24/40 to 40/40 in the Health Services Department. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I)      March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 7  AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 26 ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 21835 to reclassify one Account Clerk Advanced Level (represented) position and its incumbent to Accounting Technician (represented) in the Office of the Auditor-Controller. (General Fund)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Grants & Contracts   APPROVE and AUTHORIZE execution of agreements between the County and the following agencies for receipt of fund and/or services:   C. 27 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute, a contract amendment with the California Department of Public Health, Tuberculosis Control Branch, effective February 1, 2016, to increase the amount payable to the County by $23,476, to a new total of $314,618, to provide additional Tuberculosis Control Program services, with no change in the original term of July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2016. (No County match)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 28 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with the California Endowment, to pay the County an amount not to exceed $302,028, for the Richmond Public Health Solutions Project, for the period from February 1, 2016 through January 31, 2018. (No County match)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 29 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with the California Department of Public Health, effective April 1, 2015, to make technical adjustments to increase the amount payable to County by $21,333, to a new total payment limit of $1,351,397, for County Public Health HIV Care and Minority AIDS Initiative Project, with no change in the original term of March 31, 2014 through March 31, 2016. (No County match)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 30 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment & Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with California Department of Education, effective February 1, 2016, to increase the payment limit by $51,144 for a new total limit of $4,105,899, to provide for childcare and development programs (CalWORKS Stage 2) with no change to the term of July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2016. (No County match)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover APPROVE and AUTHORIZE execution of agreement between the County and the following parties as noted for the purchase of equipment and/or services:     March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 8 C. 31 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Delta Personnel Services, Inc., dba Guardian Security Agency, effective March 1, 2016, to increase the payment limit by $20,000 to a new total not to exceed $357,110 to provide security services for the period July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2016. (2% County, 49% State, 49% Federal)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 32 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Auditor-Controller, or designee, to pay the San Ramon Valley Fire Protection District $33,000 for EMS (Emergency Medical Services) Fire First Responder medical equipment, medical supplies and EMS training to the San Ramon Valley Fire Protection District, upon approval of the EMS Director for FY 2015-16. (100% Measure H Funds)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 33 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director or designee, to execute a contract with Heat Software USA, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $494,643, to provide software and services to the Health Services Department’s Information Technology Unit, for the period March 30, 2016 through March 29, 2019. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 34 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with La Clinica de La Raza, Inc., including modified indemnification language, for transfer and coordination of care for patients requiring emergency medical care at Contra Costa Regional Medical, for the period from March 1, 2016 through February 28, 2018. (No fiscal impact)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 35 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the County Administrator, or designee to execute a contract amendment agreement between the County and Steckbauer Weinhart, LLP, effective November 1, 2015 to increase the payment limit by $25,000 to a new payment limit of $125,000 for continued legal services on behalf of the County on a case-by-case basis in the area of tax related bankruptcy matters, as requested by the Treasurer-Tax Collector and County Counsel.        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 36 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Health Management Systems, Inc., effective February 1, 2016, to increase the payment limit by $200,000 to a new payment limit of $850,000 to continue providing auditing services, with no change in the original term of February 1, 2015 through January 31, 2017. (100% Contra Costa Health Plan Enterprise Fund II)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 37 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with    March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 9 C. 37 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Children’s Hospital & Research Center at Oakland (dba UCSF Benioff Children’s Hospital Oakland), including modified indemnification language, an amount not to exceed $20,360 to provide specialized training and case conference group sessions to the County’s Family Maternal & Child Health, Home Visiting Programs, for the period from July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2016. (100% State)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 38 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Edward Y. Tang, M.D. Inc., in an amount not to exceed $400,000, to provide orthopedic services at Contra Costa Regional Medical and Health Centers, for the period from March 1, 2016 through February 28, 2017. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 39 ACKNOWLEDGE receipt of notice from William C. Lyon, M.D., APC, requesting termination of his for the provision of orthopedic surgery services for Contra Costa Health Plan members, effective at the close of business on December 1, 2015. (100% Contra Costa Health Plan Enterprise Fund II)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 40 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute contract amendment with Cross Country Staffing, Inc. (dba medical Staffing Network), effective November 1, 2015, to modify the rate sheet to include hourly rates for X-Ray Tech and Registered Nurse Specialty services with no change in the payment limit of $8,000,000, at Contra Costa Regional Medical and Health Centers, and no change in the original term July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2016. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 41 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Chief Information Officer (Department of Information Technology), or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Infosec Professionals, LLC, to decrease the payment limit from $120,000 to a new payment limit of $62,000 with no change in the term of July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2016, for continuing information security services. (100% IT Security User fees)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Other Actions   C. 42 APPROVE revised Bylaws of the Advisory Council on Aging as recommended by the Employment and Human Services Department Director.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 43 ACCEPT the Fiscal Year 2015/16 Community Facilities District Administration Report on County of Contra Costa Community Facilities District No. 2001-1 (Norris Canyon), as recommended by the County Auditor-Controller.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 10  AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 44 ACCEPT the Treasurer's Quarterly Investment Report as of December 31, 2015, as recommended by the County Treasurer-Tax Collector.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 45 APPROVE amended Conflict of Interest Code for the Department of Conservation and Development, including the list of designated positions, as recommended by the County Counsel.        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 46 APPROVE amended Conflict of Interest Code for the Contra Costa Community College District, including the list of designated positions, as recommended by the County Counsel.        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 47 AUTHORIZE the discharge from accountability for certain Health Services accounts totaling $7,119,735.24, which are not collectible due to one or more of the following reasons: the accounts are being discharged in bankruptcy; debtors are deceased, the statute of limitations for pursuing recovery of the debt has expired; the cost of recovery is excessive; and/or the debtor no longer resides in the state. (No net impact)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 48 ACCEPT year-end productivity report from the 2015 Public Protection Committee and APPROVE recommended disposition of referrals, as recommended by the Public Protection Committee. (No fiscal impact)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 49 ADOPT Resolution No. 2016/111 updating and reaffirming the County Debt Management Policy, as recommended by the County Administrator. (No fiscal impact)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover   GENERAL INFORMATION The Board meets in all its capacities pursuant to Ordinance Code Section 24-2.402, including as the Housing Authority and the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency. Persons who wish to address the Board should complete the form provided for that purpose and furnish a copy of any written statement to the Clerk. Any disclosable public records related to an open session item on a regular meeting agenda and distributed by the Clerk of the Board to a majority of the members of the Board of Supervisors less than 72 hours prior to that meeting are available for public inspection at 651 Pine Street, First Floor, Room 106, Martinez, CA 94553, during normal business hours. All matters listed under CONSENT ITEMS are considered by the Board to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless requested by a member of the Board or a member March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 11 motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless requested by a member of the Board or a member of the public prior to the time the Board votes on the motion to adopt. Persons who wish to speak on matters set for PUBLIC HEARINGS will be heard when the Chair calls for comments from those persons who are in support thereof or in opposition thereto. After persons have spoken, the hearing is closed and the matter is subject to discussion and action by the Board. Comments on matters listed on the agenda or otherwise within the purview of the Board of Supervisors can be submitted to the office of the Clerk of the Board via mail: Board of Supervisors, 651 Pine Street Room 106, Martinez, CA 94553; by fax: 925-335-1913. The County will provide reasonable accommodations for persons with disabilities planning to attend Board meetings who contact the Clerk of the Board at least 24 hours before the meeting, at (925) 335-1900; TDD (925) 335-1915. An assistive listening device is available from the Clerk, Room 106. Copies of recordings of all or portions of a Board meeting may be purchased from the Clerk of the Board. Please telephone the Office of the Clerk of the Board, (925) 335-1900, to make the necessary arrangements. Forms are available to anyone desiring to submit an inspirational thought nomination for inclusion on the Board Agenda. Forms may be obtained at the Office of the County Administrator or Office of the Clerk of the Board, 651 Pine Street, Martinez, California. Applications for personal subscriptions to the weekly Board Agenda may be obtained by calling the Office of the Clerk of the Board, (925) 335-1900. The weekly agenda may also be viewed on the County’s Internet Web Page: www.co.contra-costa.ca.us STANDING COMMITTEES The Airport Committee (Supervisors Karen Mitchoff and Mary N. Piepho) meets quarterly on the fourth Monday of the month at 12:30 p.m. at Director of Airports Office, 550 Sally Ride Drive, Concord. The Family and Human Services Committee (Supervisors Candace Andersen and Federal D. Glover) meets on the first Monday of the month at 1:00 p.m. in Room 101, County Administration Building, 651 Pine Street, Martinez. The Finance Committee (Supervisors Federal D. Glover and John Gioia) meets on the second Monday of the month at 1:30 p.m. in Room 101, County Administration Building, 651 Pine Street, Martinez. The Hiring Outreach Oversight Committee (Supervisors John Gioia and Federal Glover) To be determined The Internal Operations Committee (Supervisors Candace Andersen and Karen Mitchoff) meets on the second Monday of the month at 9:00 a.m. in Room 101, County Administration Building, 651 Pine Street, Martinez. The Legislation Committee (Supervisors Karen Mitchoff and Mary N. Piepho) meets on the first Thursday of the month at 11:00 a.m. in Room 101, County Administration Building, 651 Pine Street, Martinez. The Public Protection Committee (Supervisors John Gioia and Federal D. Glover) meets on the second Monday of the month at 11:00 a.m. in Room 101, County Administration Building, 651 Pine Street, Martinez. The Transportation, Water & Infrastructure Committee (Supervisors Candace Andersen and Mary N. Piepho) meets on the first Thursday of the month at 1:30 p.m. in Room 101, County Administration Building, 651 Pine Street, Martinez. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 12 Airports Committee See above Family & Human Services Committee See above Finance Committee See above Hiring Outreach Oversight Committee See above Internal Operations Committee See above Legislation Committee See above Public Protection Committee See above Transportation, Water & Infrastructure Committee See above PERSONS WHO WISH TO ADDRESS THE BOARD DURING PUBLIC COMMENT OR WITH RESPECT TO AN ITEM THAT IS ON THE AGENDA, MAY BE LIMITED TO TWO (2) MINUTES A LUNCH BREAK MAY BE CALLED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE BOARD CHAIR AGENDA DEADLINE: Thursday, 12 noon, 12 days before the Tuesday Board meetings. Glossary of Acronyms, Abbreviations, and other Terms (in alphabetical order): Contra Costa County has a policy of making limited use of acronyms, abbreviations, and industry-specific language in its Board of Supervisors meetings and written materials. Following is a list of commonly used language that may appear in oral presentations and written materials associated with Board meetings: AB Assembly Bill ABAG Association of Bay Area Governments ACA Assembly Constitutional Amendment ADA Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 AFSCME American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees AICP American Institute of Certified Planners AIDS Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome ALUC Airport Land Use Commission AOD Alcohol and Other Drugs ARRA American Recovery & Reinvestment Act of 2009 BAAQMD Bay Area Air Quality Management District BART Bay Area Rapid Transit District BayRICS Bay Area Regional Interoperable Communications System BCDC Bay Conservation & Development Commission BGO Better Government Ordinance BOS Board of Supervisors CALTRANS California Department of Transportation CalWIN California Works Information Network CalWORKS California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids CAER Community Awareness Emergency Response CAO County Administrative Officer or Office CCCPFD (ConFire) Contra Costa County Fire Protection District CCHP Contra Costa Health Plan CCTA Contra Costa Transportation Authority CCRMC Contra Costa Regional Medical Center CCWD Contra Costa Water District CDBG Community Development Block Grant CFDA Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 13 CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CIO Chief Information Officer COLA Cost of living adjustment ConFire (CCCFPD) Contra Costa County Fire Protection District CPA Certified Public Accountant CPI Consumer Price Index CSA County Service Area CSAC California State Association of Counties CTC California Transportation Commission dba doing business as DSRIP Delivery System Reform Incentive Program EBMUD East Bay Municipal Utility District ECCFPD East Contra Costa Fire Protection District EIR Environmental Impact Report EIS Environmental Impact Statement EMCC Emergency Medical Care Committee EMS Emergency Medical Services EPSDT Early State Periodic Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment Program (Mental Health) et al. et alii (and others) FAA Federal Aviation Administration FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency F&HS Family and Human Services Committee First 5 First Five Children and Families Commission (Proposition 10) FTE Full Time Equivalent FY Fiscal Year GHAD Geologic Hazard Abatement District GIS Geographic Information System HCD (State Dept of) Housing & Community Development HHS (State Dept of ) Health and Human Services HIPAA Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act HIV Human Immunodeficiency Syndrome HOV High Occupancy Vehicle HR Human Resources HUD United States Department of Housing and Urban Development IHSS In-Home Supportive Services Inc. Incorporated IOC Internal Operations Committee ISO Industrial Safety Ordinance JPA Joint (exercise of) Powers Authority or Agreement Lamorinda Lafayette-Moraga-Orinda Area LAFCo Local Agency Formation Commission LLC Limited Liability Company LLP Limited Liability Partnership Local 1 Public Employees Union Local 1 LVN Licensed Vocational Nurse MAC Municipal Advisory Council MBE Minority Business Enterprise M.D. Medical Doctor M.F.T. Marriage and Family Therapist MIS Management Information System MOE Maintenance of Effort MOU Memorandum of Understanding MTC Metropolitan Transportation Commission NACo National Association of Counties NEPA National Environmental Policy Act March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 14 OB-GYN Obstetrics and Gynecology O.D. Doctor of Optometry OES-EOC Office of Emergency Services-Emergency Operations Center OPEB Other Post Employment Benefits OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration PARS Public Agencies Retirement Services PEPRA Public Employees Pension Reform Act Psy.D. Doctor of Psychology RDA Redevelopment Agency RFI Request For Information RFP Request For Proposal RFQ Request For Qualifications RN Registered Nurse SB Senate Bill SBE Small Business Enterprise SEIU Service Employees International Union SUASI Super Urban Area Security Initiative SWAT Southwest Area Transportation Committee TRANSPAC Transportation Partnership & Cooperation (Central) TRANSPLAN Transportation Planning Committee (East County) TRE or TTE Trustee TWIC Transportation, Water and Infrastructure Committee UASI Urban Area Security Initiative VA Department of Veterans Affairs vs. versus (against) WAN Wide Area Network WBE Women Business Enterprise WCCTAC West Contra Costa Transportation Advisory Committee March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 15 RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve and authorize the Health Services Director, or his designee, to execute, on behalf of the County, Contract #24-716-1 with Resource Development Associates, Inc., a corporation, in an amount not to exceed $400,000, to provide consultation and technical assistance with regard to County’s Assertive Community Treatment (ACT), for persons with serious mental illness who demonstrate resistance to voluntarily participating in services that have been offered, for the period from November 16, 2015 through June 30, 2019. FISCAL IMPACT: This Contract is funded 100% State Mental Health Services Act (MHSA) BACKGROUND: This Contract meets the social needs of County’s population by providing APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 03/08/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS Contact: Cynthia Belon, 957-5201 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: March 8, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: , Deputy cc: D.3 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #24-716-1 with Resource Development Associates, Inc. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 16 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) assistance to the Behavioral Health Administration with various programs within the AB 1421 or Laura’s Law under the Mental Health Services Act. This contract covers Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) model. Treatment is provided in the community on an outpatient basis for individuals whose symptoms of mental illness result in serious functioning difficulties in several major areas of life. Under Contract #24-716-1, the Contractor will provide consultation and technical assistance to the Department with regard to County’s Assertive Community Treatment (ACT), for intensive and highly integrated outpatient treatment for individuals whose symptoms of mental illness result in serious functioning difficulties in several areas of life, including work, social relationships, residential independence, money management, physical health and wellness through June 30, 2019. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, County will not receive consultation and technical assistance for Assertive Community Treatment cited by AB 1421, from this contractor. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: Not applicable. CLERK'S ADDENDUM CONTINUED to March 29, 2016 for consideration inclusive of the new information requested. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 17 RECOMMENDATION(S): RECEIVE update on the status of the Contra Costa Transportation Authority's (Authority) development of a Transportation Expenditure Plan (TEP) for a possible sales tax measure in 2016, including aspects related to the Urban Limit Line (ULL), and DIRECT staff as appropriate. FISCAL IMPACT: None. The recommendation addresses an outside agency's actions. BACKGROUND: As established in both the October 21, 2014 and November 3, 2015 letters to the Authority regarding the TEP, the Board of Supervisors (BOS) has not yet endorsed the proposed transportation sales tax. That broader issue will be addressed at a future meeting of the Board. Please note, aspects of TEP formulation related to the ULL are discussed at the end of this report and a list of preliminary alternatives for responding to public requests to discourage all changes to the ULL without voter approval is provided in Attachment 12. HISTORY Reports on this issue have been brought to previous BOS meetings. Those reports included a substantial amount of background information. The most recent comprehensive report is available at the link below: APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 03/08/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: John Cunningham (925) 674-7833 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: March 8, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: D.4 To:Board of Supervisors From:John Kopchik, Director, Conservation & Development Department Date:March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Update on the Status of the Contra Costa Transportation Authority's Development of a Transportation Expenditure Plan March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 18 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) September 15, 2015 http://64.166.146.245/docs/2015/BOS/20150915_640/650_09-15-15_826_AGENDApacket.pdf#page=128 For additional background, the previous two letters from the BOS to the Authority are attached (Attachment 1: BOS to CCTA re TEP Nov 2015 and Attachment 2: BOS to CCTA re TEP Oct 2014). RECENT EVENTS February 2016 The Authority released an "Initial DRAFT Transportation Expenditure Plan (For Discussion Only)". Please see Attachment 3:Draft TEP 1-1. Several more versions are anticipated prior to CCTA adoption of a final TEP which is scheduled for May (See Attachment 4:CCTA TEP Schedule). The schedule anticipates a next draft TEP to come before the Cities and the County in April. January 2016 A coalition of environmental, labor, transportation, housing, social justice, faith, civic and other public interest advocates submitted a document to the Authority entitled "A Community Vision for a New Transportation Sales Tax". The document (Attachment 5: Community Vision for a New Transportation Sales Tax 1-6-16 .pdf) enumerates what the coalition believes are the major planning issues facing Contra Costa County. In summary: Ever-increasing traffic, the direct result of land use decisions and induced demand. A pressing demand for new homes and jobs within our cities and towns where residents and employees of all incomes have access to safe and convenient transit, walking, and biking networks, reducing single--?occupant driving and greenhouse gas emissions. The need to dramatically increase funding for transit and enhance the existing transit system for peak performance. Growing threats to our natural and agricultural lands, requiring stronger protections and investments. An economic imperative to create quality jobs closer to home. The document goes on to suggest solutions to the problem urging that the funding measure be "transformational". STAFF REVIEW OF DRAFT TRANSPORTATION EXPENDITURE PLAN (TEP) The following information reviews TEP funding categories relative to prior BOS input to the Authority. Not all TEP categories were addressed by the BOS, so the information below is limited to those areas previous addressed by the BOS. The entire TEP is attached to this report, Attachment 3: Draft TEP 1-1.pdf. 1. Local Streets Maintenance & Improvements Draft TEP Language Funding Level: 23.1% Narrative "1: Local Streets Maintenance & Improvements Funds from this category will fund maintenance and improvement projects on local streets and roads and may be used for any eligible transportation purposes as defined under the Act and to comply with the GMP requirements. The Authority will distribute 23.1 percent of the annual sales tax revenues to all local jurisdictions with a base allocation of $100,000 for each jurisdiction, the balance will be distributed based 50 percent on relative population and 50 percent on road miles for each jurisdiction, subject to compliance with the Authority’s reporting, audit and GMP requirements, consistent with the current Measure J program. Population figures used shall be the most current available from the State Department of Finance. Road mileage shall be from the most current State Controller’s Annual Report of Financial Transactions for Streets and Roads. Funds shall be used by each jurisdiction to maintain and enhance existing roadway and other transportation facilities. Jurisdictions shall comply with the Authority’s Maintenance of Effort (MOE) policy as well as Implementation Guidelines of this TEP. Local agencies will report on the use of these funds, such as the amount spent on roadway maintenance, bicycle and pedestrian facilities, transit facilities, and other roadway improvements." Prior Contra Costa County BOS Comment Funding Level: 25%-30% Narrative (partial excerpt) "Considering the above, the Board supports the funding levels for local streets and roads (maintenance and improvements) in a new TEP that the Regional Transportation Planning Committees (RTPCs) have taken. Specifically, SWAT at 25%-30%, TRANSPAC at 30%, TRANSPLAN at 30% and WCCTAC at 28%. This support includes complete streets concepts as detailed below. The Board recognizes the importance of improving and maintaining our local streets and roads for all modes of transportation." Staff Comments While the distribution formula proposed is consistent with existing policies and the reporting mechanism is consistent with prior BOS input, the difference in proposed funding relative to the need is substantial. Even the higher funding level recommended by the RTPCs would not have addressed the full need. Several issues magnify the importance of increased maintenance funding, the lack of stability of state funding, and directly related non-pavement roadway maintenance needs. These have been discussed previously at the BOS: Maintenance Funding: From the 9/15/15 report: "While pavement condition data and costs are most frequently reported, the directly related, non-pavement needs exceed the pavement needs. These non-pavement needs are included in this discussion because they are inextricably linked to road maintenance costs and activities. Some of these costs include signage, traffic signal systems, shoulder maintenance, lighting, drainage/stormwater infrastructure (culverts, gutter, hydrauger, etc.), clean water infrastructure requirements, guardrail/crash cushion, sweeping, landscaping, street trees, curb/sidewalk, retaining walls, etc. This is an incomplete list." March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 19 These issues have been recently highlighted with the County having to repair several sinkholes in the recent past, one on Hazel Avenue in East Richmond and the other on Marsh Creek Road. The storm drain system is very often, "out of sight, out of mind" but is, nonetheless, an integral asset of the roadway system. State Transportation Funding: From the 9/15/15 report: ...the reliability of state revenues is somewhat speculative. This is distinct from local funds which are insulated from being used for other purposes. Local funds are relatively stable for the life of local transportation measures, subject only to the performance of the overall economy. Given the glaring maintenance shortfall that remains even after an assumed increase in local maintenance funds, staff does not consider the potential for increased state maintenance funding and funding reliability as substantially off-setting the need for increases in local maintenance funding. This issue has been highlighted recently with the reduction of gas tax revenues having a disastrous effect on maintenance revenues. Please see Attachment 6: Collapse of Gas Tax 2016 which quantifies and depicts the reductions. The Board may wish to consider whether, given the competing needs for funding in multiple categories, the proposed allocation is appropriate. 12. Transportation for Seniors & People With Disabilities Draft TEP Language Funding Level: 2.1% Narrative "Transportation for Seniors & People With Disabilities or what is often referred to as “Paratransit” services or Accessible Transportation Services (ATS) can be broadly divided into two categories: (1) services required to be provided by transit operators under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) to people functionally unable to ride fixed route service; and (2) services not required by law but necessary for frail seniors and people with disabilities whose needs are beyond the requirements of the ADA (for example, extra hours of service or greater geographic coverage or requirement for service beyond curb-to-curb), or for non-ADA eligible seniors. Projections indicate that people that would be eligible for these services is the fasts growing segment of our population and will likely (blank) over the next (blank) years. Funding in this category will be used to fund accessible transportation services. These services shall support both non-ADA and ADA services for eligible participants. To ensure services are delivered in a coordinated system that maximizes both service delivery and efficiency an Accessible Transportation Service (ATS) Strategic Plan will be developed and periodically updated during the term of the measure. No funding under this category will be allocated until the ATS Strategic Plan has been developed and adopted. An overarching component in the development and delivery of the ATS Strategic Plan is using mobility management to ensure coordination and efficiencies in accessible service delivery. The plan will evaluate the appropriate model for our local structure including how accessible services are delivered by all agencies and where appropriate coordination can improve transportation services, eliminate gaps in service and find efficiencies in the service delivered. The ATS Strategic Plan would also determine the investments and oversight of the program funding and identify timing, projects, service delivery options, administrative structure, and fund leverage opportunities." Prior Contra Costa County BOS Comment From the 11/3/15 BOS Letter re: the TEP Funding Level: n/a Narrative "1) The TEP should, in addition to providing additional operations funding, fund a countywide mobility management program as recommended in the CCMMP (Contra Costa Mobility Management Plan) . The CCMMP includes preliminary cost figures for implementation which may need to be refined as we move ahead. As implementation progresses, the Board strongly recommends consideration of a transition to the mobility management/brokerage model used in Santa Clara County. 2) Currently, Measure J has eligibility requirements placed on local jurisdictions in order to receive Local Streets & Maintenance funding. As mentioned in the Local Streets and Roads section above, additional requirements are being considered for supplementary maintenance funding. Similar to those requirements, the Board is proposing that eligibility for transit funding under a new TEP be contingent upon participation in the implementation of the mobility management program and other identified improvements to accessible services. 3) Implementing the service model proposed in #1 above is a substantial investment. We believe that the County and Authority Board members would benefit from a tour of the Santa Clara County accessible services operation, OUTREACH. The OUTREACH operation is non-profit based and is a national model for cost-effective procurement, contracting and operations . During a time where our own transit operations show a trend of increasing costs, the OUTREACH model has shown reduced costs . The Board is requesting attendance from Authority members on this tour tentatively scheduled for mid-NovemberDecember. 4) One barrier to progress on this issue is the understandable resistance to any changes in service to a sensitive population. As we move ahead with this effort, an explicit commitment should be made by all agencies involved to insulate current accessible transit customers from service degradations or interruptions." Staff Comments The narrative and proposed policies in the Draft TEP are largely consistent with County input and look positive. The "Non-Rail Transit Enhancements" program includes the following qualification: "Recipients of funding under this category are required to participate in the development of the Accessible Transportation Services Strategic Plan included in Category 12. Transportation for Seniors and People with Disabilities.". This is directly responsive to BOS input to ensure implementation. The Draft TEP includes a recommendation for a Accessible Transportation Service (ATS) Strategic Plan which is a positive development. Considering our numerous public and private accessible transit providers, migrating to a different system will require a substantial amount of planning, the ATS Strategic Plan will fulfill that. At a recent Authority Board meeting, there was a suggestion that the study should be done in the short term, there is no March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 20 reason to wait for the TEP process to be completed. The BOS may wish to discuss this option and communicate it's preference. See Attachment 7: Mobility Matters which was distributed at a recent Authority Special TEP meeting during the Accessible Transit discussion. The BOS did not weigh in on an appropriate funding level for this program. Now that a figure has been proposed in the Draft TEP the BOS may wish to consider providing input on the amount of funding. The following information is provided to inform that consideration: 1) Demographics From 2010 to 2060 the working age (25-64) population will grow 38%. During this same time period the population that will increase demand for accessible transit service will grow as follows, 65-74=125%, 75-84=198%, and 85+=299%. See chart below. 2) Other Cost Magnifiers There are other factors that will magnify the impact of the demographics illustrated above: • The consolidation trend in medical facilities and services will result in more trips and longer trips. • Expansions of fixed route service funded in the TEP will result in a compulsory expansion of ADA paratransit. • An increase in the veterans population. 3) Implications of a New Service Model The study and service proposals in the TEP are are likely to improve service efficiency, reduce costs, and attract other funds. However, given the substantial demographics problem mentioned above, the "silver tsunami", these improvements and efficiencies are not likely to completely offset the growth in demand. In addition, the study of and incubation of a new mobility management program will take some investment. 4) RTPC Input See chart below comparing RTPC input compared to funding levels in the Draft TEP. The "Transportation for Seniors and People with Disabilities" program had the largest negative discrepancy between the RTPC "ask" and proposed funding level: RTPC Request: $105M, Draft TEP: $50M. 16. Community Development Incentive (CDI) Program Draft TEP Language Funding Level: 6% Narrative "Funds from this category will be used implement this new Community Development Incentive program, administered by the Authority’s Regional Transportation Planning Committees (RTPC’s). Funds will be allocated on a competitive basis to transportation projects or programs that promote economic development, job creation and/or housing within established (or planned) transit supportive community centers. Project sponsors must demonstrate that at least 20% of the project is funded from other than local transportation sales tax revenue and the Authority will prioritize funding to projects that demonstrate over 50% funding from other sources. Additional priority will be given to projects where the sponsor can demonstrate that the project supports and facilitates development of housing for all income levels. Working with the RTPCs, the Authority will prepare guidelines and establish overall criteria for the program." Prior Contra Costa County BOS Comment From the 11/3/15 BOS Letter re: the TEP Funding Level: n/a Narrative "Improved Land Use Coordination...Initial Ideas on the Funding Allocation Approach: The TEP could allocate a portion of the future funds to a congestion reduction program related to stimulating certain types of new development. Funds for such a program could be used to stimulate certain infill and other development that demonstrates positive impacts on the transportation system, such as reduced demand on the most congested freeways and roads, better utilization of transit, greater off-peak utilization, reduced average commute times, and reduction of out-of-county commute trips. This could take the form of development in Priority Development Areas (PDAs) near transit or other types of development that achieve the demand reduction goal. For Contra Costa County, jobs/housing balance is a key concern. A focus on developing employment centers that would offer well-paying jobs proximate to housing (i.e. priority industrial areas or priority employment areas) could have merit. Stimulating development that establishes well-paying jobs in East County, for example, could reduce strain on Highway 4, offer a far easier commute for East County residents and make better use of prior transportation investments by stimulating the counter commute. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 21 Subject to feasibility studies, demonstration of congestion reduction, and Authority approval, local jurisdictions could request funding for projects that would stimulate development that would reduce congestion. Such investments could include transportation infrastructure (e.g. improvements to transit and roadways in areas targeted for job growth). However, to realize the congestion reduction benefit of the desired development, a broader range of investments could be considered, such as advanced telecommunication/broadband infrastructure, water, sewer, power, impact fee offsets, land assembly, or other investments. The analysis should consider not only the direct growth in jobs (and housing) likely to result from the investment, but also the net growth in jobs (certain jobs such as advanced manufacturing can have relatively high job multipliers). Initial Ideas on the Policy Incentives Approach: The TEP might include additional policy incentives to promote infill and other development that reduces congestion. For example, the TEP could include incentives for local agencies to adopt and implement certain land-use policies such as PDAs, priority industrial areas or priority employment areas, greater density along transit or employment targets. Alternatively, incentives could be linked to certain TEP funding categories. For instance, economic development/jobs-housing balance/congestion reduction goals could be criteria for allocating funding to any competitively awarded pots of funds." Staff Comments There has been some concern at the Authority Board regarding expenditures indirectly related to transportation. The proposal in the Draft TEP takes an approach that funds a program as suggested by the BOS and others, but also addresses the concerns regarding expenditures. The draft program is potentially consistent with the BOS input. Because the policy details are deferred to a future date, "...the Authority will prepare guidelines and establish overall criteria..." it is not entirely clear how the program will be structured or administered, though it is envisioned as a competitive grant program managed primarily at the RTPC level. The BOS input had language requiring a nexus between the funded project and congestion reduction. The TEP proposal includes the following, "...projects or programs that promote economic development, job creation and/or housing within established or (or planned) transit supportive community centers". While this policy will result in congestion reduction as a derivative, the Authority may wish to be more explicit on this point in order to better address the concerns expressed regarding expenditures indirectly relating to transportation. Likewise, staff recommends that the language be adjusted to avoid preventing funding for needed job growth in areas that will substantially reduce congestion, vehicle miles traveled and greenhouse gas emissions but immediately proximate to transit. The Board may also wish to provide input on the funding amount for the program and discuss other aspects such as how the program should be administered. 15. Pedestrian, Bicycle and Trail Facilities Draft TEP Language Two-thirds of the funds from this program will be used implement projects in the Countywide Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan, consistent with the current Measure J program. These funds will be allocated competitively to projects that improve safety for pedestrians and bicyclists, serve the greatest number of users and significant destinations, and remove missing segments and existing barriers to walking and bicycling. The review process shall also consider project feasibility and readiness and the differing needs of the sub-regions when identifying projects for funding. Funding available through this program shall be primarily used for the construction, maintenance, and safety or other improvements of bicycle, pedestrian and trail projects. No design, project approval, right-of-way purchase and environmental clearance may only shall be funded as part of a construction project. Planning to identify a preferred alignment for major new bicycle, pedestrian or trail connections may also be funded through this program. One third of the funds are to be allocated to the East Bay Regional Park District (EBRPD) for the development and rehabilitation of paved regional trails. EBRPD is to spend its allocation proportionally in each sub-region, subject to the review and approval of the applicable sub-regional committee, prior to funding allocation by the Authority. The Authority in conjunction with EBRPD will develop a maintenanceof- effort requirement for funds under this category. Consistent with the Countywide Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan and the complete streets policy established in this expenditure plan, project sponsors receiving funding through other funding categories in this Plan shall incorporate, whenever possible, pedestrian, bicycle, and trail facilities into their projects. Prior Contra Costa County BOS Comment Contra Costa County currently has the lowest rate of trips-by-bike rate in the Bay Area according to the MTC . Please consider a strategic approach to developing and prioritizing bicycle project and program activities to reverse this rate to improve the County’s ranking. One component of that strategic approach could be to further expand and improve the County’s network of separated, Class I trails. These facilities often have a substantial number of users, traveling at varying speeds, on a single path. For example, a “bicycle expressway” could be a separate project in the Iron Horse corridor that would accommodate faster cyclists. This would increase usage, safety, and comfort for both cyclists and pedestrians and merits consideration during development of the TEP. Staff Comment The program largely continues the existing policies. The "bicycle expressway" concept proposed by the BOS could be funded under this program. Major Projects Draft TEP Language At this time, the Draft TEP does not include project specific information. Another draft will be distributed for review by the Cities and County in May. However, at this time, all projects proposed by the County would be eligible for funding under the appropriate program categories. OTHER COMMENTS • BART Funding Request The magnitude of proposed BART TEP funding has been discussed at recent Authority meetings. Attached is communication from BART (Attachment 8: BART Information BART Information) documenting the funding need, reiterating that BART expenditures poll well, and generally communicating BART benefits to Contra Costa County. • Public Managers Association (PMA) Input on the TEP The PMA has met with Authority staff and provided input on the process. Attachment 9: Public Managers Association - TEP show the proposal discussed. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 22 The PMA has met with Authority staff and provided input on the process. Attachment 9: Public Managers Association - TEP show the proposal discussed. • RTPC Funding Requests Relative to Draft Transportation Expenditure Plan Please see the two charts: - Attachment 10: NEW MEASURE TRANSPORTATION EXPENDITURE PLAN (DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION ONLY): Prepared by CCTA staff for discussion at the RTPCs. The chart shows the Draft TEP funding categories, what each RTPC requested, and what is proposed in the Draft TEP. - Below: New Measure Transportation Expenditure Plan: RTPC REQUEST COMPARED TO DRAFT TEP: Prepared by County staff, this chart is based on the above chart which isolates and compares the RTPC $ request to the Draft TEP amount and is sorted by % difference between the two. The table only compares two funding scenarios (RTPC recommendations and the first draft TEP). The broader dialog on the measure actually includes multiple inputs--advocacy groups, individual agencies, etc. The RTPC scenario is included as the benchmark because the Board had input on this scenario through participation on the RTPCs. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 23 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (GMP) The Draft TEP does not yet have any changes proposed for the GMP, thorough proposals are expected soon. However, there has been substantial discussion regarding the Urban Limit Line and related matters, including proposals from the coalition that authored the document entitled "Community Vision for a New Transportation Sales Tax", Greenbelt Alliance and the Public Managers Association. See Attachment 5: Community Vision for a New Transportation Sales Tax , Attachment 9: Public Managers Association - TEP and Attachment 11: 2-2-16 Letter GA to CCTA re GMP. Measure J conditions receipt of certain return to source sales tax proceeds on local jurisdictions having a voter-approved ULL. Measure J also provides that adjustments to such ULLs be approved by the voters but allows changes less than 30-acres in size to be made without voter approval (30-acre exception). In the January 6, 2016, document entitled, “A Community Vision for a New Transportation Sales Tax”, a Coalition proposes the following relative to the ULL: “Enhance our Urban Limit Lines (ULLs): To prevent sprawl development, we must eliminate the loophole in Contra Costa County’s Urban Limit Lines that allows 30-acre expansions without a public vote. And we must refine our existing ULL policies by defining key terms such as “urban” and “rural,” clarifying which services must comply with our urban limit lines (water, sewer, etc.), and preventing subdivisions outside the lines.” A more detailed rationale for making these changes is provided in Recommendation 1 in the February 2, 2016 letter from Greenbelt Alliance (Attachment 11). The proposal to remove the 30-acre exception in the new measure has been discussed by the CCTA Board on several occasions, including most recently at their February 17 meeting. Several CCTA Board Members have expressed strong concerns with the idea of removing the 30-acre exception, citing a lack of evidence that the exception was being used, let alone abused. Some Members also described the need to maintain some flexibility because modest changes to the ULL may be necessary to address detailed placement of the line when it splits a parcel or to provide a safety valve in case of a jobs or housing crisis. Some members also expressed concern with making substantial changes to ULL policy while the County is in the middle of performing the 2016 review of the ULL required by Measure L. Concern has also been expressed that a consequence of requiring voter approval of even modest changes to the ULL may be that the ability to develop compromise approaches for 30-acre-or-less expansions through the land use planning process may be replaced with ballot measures where the only options are yes or no. The CCTA Board also discussed various compromise alternatives to removing the 30-acre exception. CCTA staff was requested to work with County staff to describe a range of preliminary alternatives for consideration by the CCTA Board at a subsequent meeting. Supervisors Andersen and Mitchoff also expressed their intention to ask County staff to bring a discussion of the matter to the Board of Supervisors in early March. County staff has worked with CCTA to develop some preliminary alternatives for responding to the request to remove the 30-acre exception. Please find those preliminary alternatives discussed in Attachment 12. Those alternatives include making no change to the ULL provisions, removing the 30-acre exception and options in between. Several alternatives relate to ensuring greater consistency in the ULL amendment requirements of the various jurisdictions. CCTA staff prepared a summary table comparing the different requirements (Attachment 13). As illustrated in the table, current requirements for other jurisdictions are different from those of the County. For the County to expand the ULL by less than 30 acres without voter approval, Measure L requires a super majority vote of the BOS and requires the adoption of one of seven findings (see Attachment 14). In addition, the County has formalized interpretation of the Measure J requirements related to defining the phrase “non-consecutive adjustments” as it relates to the ULL (see attachment 15, Principles of Agreement for Establishing the Urban Limit Line from the Measure J TEP and Attachment 16, 2007 correspondence between Dennis Barry and Robert McCleary). At least two cities have codified this clarification on nonconsecutive adjustments through an Exhibit attached to their ULL Resolutions (see Attachment 17, the Oakley ULL Resolution, particularly Exhibit 1 to that Resolution). For a summary history of the County's ULL, please see Attachment 18, a February 22, 2005 memo from Dennis Barry to the Board of Supervisors. In 2006, subsequent to the preparation of that memo, Measure L was approved by the voters. Staff recommends that the Board review the preliminary alternatives provided in Attachment 13 and discuss the Board position relative to how the ULL is treated in the proposed 2016 sales tax measure. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If direction is not provided, the County may forego an opportunity to provide input on the development of the Transportation Expenditure Plan. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: None. CLERK'S ADDENDUM ACCEPTED the report; and provided direction relative to the Urban Limit Line discussion. ATTACHMENTS Attachment 1: BOS to CCTA re TEP Nov 2015 Attachment 2: BOS to CCTA re TEP Oct 2014 Attachment 3: Draft TEP 1-1 Attachment 4: CCTA TEP Schedule Attachment 5: Community Vision for a New Transportation Sales Tax 1-6-16 Attachment 6: Collapse of Gas Tax 2016 Attachment 7: MobilityMatters.pdf March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 24 Attachment 8: BART Information Attachment 9: Public Managers Association - TEP.pdf Attachment 10: CCTA TEP-Funding Breakdown by Subregion.pdf Attachment 11: 2-2-16 Letter GA to CCTA re GMP Attachment 12: ULL and 2016 Tax Measure- Preliminary Alternatives Attachment 13: Comparison of Requirements for ULL Changes Attachment 14: Excerpts from County Code Related to the Urban Limit Line Attachment 15: Principles of Agreement regarding ULL from Measure J TEP Attachment 16: Exchange of Letters--Interpretation of TEP regarding non-consecutive changes to ULL Attachment 17: Oakley Ordinance Attachment 18: ULL History from February 22, 2005 memo March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 25 The Board of Supervisors County Administration Building 651 Pine Street, Room 106 Martinez, California 94553 John Gioia, 1" District Candace Andersen, 200 District Mary N. Piepho, 3nt District Karen Mitchoff, 4th District Federal D. Glover, 5th District November 3, 2015 Julie Pierce, Chair Contra Costa Transportation Authority 2999 Oak Road, Suite 100 Walnut Creek, CA 94597 Contra Costa County Subject: Transportation Expenditure Plan & Potential Sales Tax Measure Dear Chair Pierce: David Twa Clerk of the Board and County Administrator (925) 335-1900 On November 3, 2015, the Board of Supervisors (Board) approved the following comments be transmitted to the Contra Costa Transportation Authority. This letter details our position on policies and funding levels for the Transportation Expenditure Plan (TEP), currently under development by the Contra Costa Transportation Authority (Authority). At its September 15,2015 meeting the Board received a report on TEP issues and formally recommended the positions detailed below. This comment letter does not constitute an endorsement by the Board of the concept of a 2016 transportation sales tax. The Board will consider that broader issue at a future meeting in the context of the Board's assessment of the need for new funding for transportation and other services. Local Streets and Roads: As you are aware, the demand for increased maintenance funding is a national, statewide, and local problem. In reviewing data regarding the County's maintenance needs, it is clear that a substantial increase in Local Streets Maintenance and Improvements funding is necessary. An analysis performed by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) has shown that in unincorporated Contra Costa County over a 24 year period, we have a revenue shortfall of $442 million to address pavement and directly related non- pavement needs. Expanding on that analysis, assuming 30% revenues from a new TEP, March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 26 Julie Pierce, Chair-CCTA November 3, 2015 Page2 o£8 there would continue to be a $350 million shortfall over the same period. These figures don't include the maintenance demand for the 111 bridges in unincorporated County. In addition to our current maintenance shortfall, we also have a need for more funding to implement and maintain complete street projects in our unincorporated communities to serve all of the users of our roads and enhance neighborhoods. Considering the above, the Board supports the funding levels for local streets and roads (maintenance and improvements) in a new TEP that the Regional Transportation Planning Committees (RTPCs) have taken. Specifically, SWAT at 25%-30%, TRANSPAC at 30%, TRANSPLAN at 30% and WCCTAC at 28%. This support includes complete streets concepts as detailed below. The Board recognizes the importance of improving and maintaining our local streets and roads for all modes of transportation. Recommendations from SWAT, TRANSPAC and WCCTAC include funding for complete streets and multi-modal projects within the local streets and roads category. TRANSPLAN recommends 30% for local streets maintenance and improvements and also recommends additional funding amounts for projects for bike and pedestrian improvements, safe transportation for schools as well as Transportation for Livable Communities. During our discussion on maintenance needs, the topic of progress at the state regarding transportation finance reform was considered. While the Board has hope that the State will reform transportation financing practices, our data show that even if the maximum funding increases considered during the recent special session of the State legislature were enacted, we would continue to have a substantial maintenance backlog. We understand there is an interest in establishing a reporting mechanism to provide additional accountability and tracking of maintenance funding. The Board is supportive of this and is willing to work with the Authority and other member agencies to develop a mechanism to ensure that maintenance expenditure practices are transparent. Accessible Services/Mobility Management/Paratransit: As we indicated in our October 21,2014 comment letter on the Countywide Transportation Plan, the issue of improvements to transit for the elderly and people with disabilities (accessible services) is a priority for the Board. This issue is longstanding; the Board made similar comments in 2002 during the effort to reauthorize Measure C. The Board is making these comments due to the forecasted growth of the target population1 and increasing costs2 . 1 65+ Bay Area population is forecasted to grow 137% by 2040. Data sources: 2010 Census, California Department ofFinance, ABAG 260% increase in paratransit cost per trip from 2004 to 2013 (average of all Contra Costa County transit agencies) Data source: 2004-2013 National Transit Database March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 27 Julie Pierce, Chair-CCTA November 3, 2015 Page3 of 8 The Board believes this issue requires substantial, deliberate attention given that accessible transit responsibilities are diffused in Contra Costa County, making progress challenging. Accessible transit in the County consists of four different public Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) para transit providers, program specific transit providers, city-based providers and the County itself has certain transportation obligations related to health care and the Older Americans Act. This structure grew organically over time and as such, no single organization falls naturally into a leadership role. With the recommendations below, we want to provide a countywide direction and improve services to our shared constituency while providing much needed cost controls. In our October 2014 comment letter we indicated that accessible service would need, in addition to additional funding, fundamental administrative changes if we are to respond adequately in a cost-effective manner to the projected demand for service. The recommendations below build on those earlier comments and are consistent with the 2013 Contra Costa Mobility Management Plan (CCMMP), as well as the unfulfilled recommendations in the 2004 Contra Costa Paratransit Improvement Study. The recommendations in this letter and found in the CCMMP are also consistent with MTC's Coordinated Public Transit -Human Services Transportation Plan Update for the Bay Area. The MTC Plan has the recommendation of "strengthening mobility management" which includes the designation of a Consolidated Transportation Services Agency3 (CTSA). The designation of a CTSA is also a recommendation in the 2013 CCMMP. The Board supports the following relative to accessible services in a new TEP: 1) The TEP should, in addition to providing additional operations funding, fund a countywide mobility management4 program as recommended in the CCMMP5• The CCMMP includes preliminary cost figures for implementation which may need to be refined as we move ahead. As implementation progresses, the Board strongly 3 CTSA: Adapted from several public sources: Created under AB 210 (1979-"Social Services Transportation Improvement Act"). The purpose of the Act was to improve the quality of transportation services to low mobility groups while achie\ing cost savings, lowered insurance premiums and more efficient use of vehicles and funding resources. The legislation took the middle course between absolutely mandating and simply facilitating the coordination of transportation services. Designation of CTSAs and implementation of other aspects of the Act were seen as a flexible mechanism to deal with the problem of inefficient or duplicative transportation services. 4 Mobility Management Defined: Mobility management (MM) is a strategic approach to the coordination of transportation service, revenue streams, technology implementation, and customer service. MM directs passengers to the most appropriate and cost-effective transportation option using information, incentives, and other voluntary measures. Best implemented on a larger scale, a mobility-managed service area provides a full range of well synchronized mobility services in a cost effective manner. 5 A small non-profit, "Mobility Matters" (formerly, "Senior Helpline Services") has begun providing some mobility management in Contra Costa County. However, that organization has limited funding thorough grants expiring in 2016. TRANSPAC provides Mobility Matters some Measure J funds (20a-Sr/Disabled Transportation) for a volunteer driver program. No Measure J funds are used for mobility management functions. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 28 Julie Pierce, Chair -CCTA November 3, 2015 Page4 of8 recommends consideration of a transition to the mobility management/brokerage6 model used in Santa Clara County. 2) Currently, Measure J has eligibility requirements placed on local jurisdictions in order to receive Local Streets & Maintenance funding. As mentioned in the Local Streets and Roads section above, additional requirements are being considered for supplementary maintenance funding. Similar to those requirements, the Board is proposing that eligibility for transit funding under a new TEP be contingent upon participation in the implementation of the mobility management program and other identified improvements to accessible services. 3) Implementing the service model proposed in #1 above is a substantial investment. We believe that the County and Authority Board members would benefit from a tour of the Santa Clara County accessible services operation, OUTREACH. The OUTREACH operation is non-profit based and is a national model for cost-effective procurement, contracting and operations7• During a time where our own transit operations show a trend of increasing costs, the OUTREACH model has shown reduced costs8• The Board is requesting attendance from Authority members on this tour tentatively scheduled for December. 4) One barrier to progress on this issue is the understandable resistance to any changes in service to a sensitive population. As we move ahead with this effort, an explicit commitment should be made by all agencies involved to insulate current accessible transit customers from service degradations or interruptions. The Authority should be aware that the Board is fully committed to pursuing improvements to accessible transit. The Santa Clara County mobility management/brokerage model includes County support by way of competitive pricing on vehicle maintenance, vehicle parking and bulk fuel purchases. The Board is currently exploring the possibility of duplicating that service in Contra Costa. Improved Land Use Coordination: In our October 2014letter and at our September 15th discussion, the Board discussed the need for economic development and balancing jobs 6 A mobility management operation can, over time, transition to a "brokerage" model. A brokerage model splits functions related to ADA paratransit/accessible service with a transit agency. Those functions span a continuum starting with administrative responsibilities (contracting with service providers, monitoring performance, customer service) all the way up to a full service brokerage (central call center/dispatch, management of a coordinated system, etc). Adapted from FTA Report #0081, "Accessible Services for All": http://www.fta.dot.gov/documents. 'FTA Reoort No. 0081.odf#nage=39 7 Federal Transit Administration, "Accessible Transit Services for All" December 2014 www.fta.dot.gov/documents/FT A Reoort No. 0081.pdf#page=246 8 19% decrease in cost per trip from 2004 to 2013 Data source: 2004-2013 National Transit Database March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 29 Julie Pierce, Chair-CCTA November 3, 2015 PageS of8 and housing to make more efficient use of our transportation infrastructure. The following statistics underscore the structural problems that challenge our transportation network as well the potential benefits of addressing these problems: 1) The five cities in the Bay Area with the longest commute times are all in Contra Costa County9; 2) Contra Costa is second only to Solano for having the lowest number of jobs relative to housing10 and is forecast to be the only County in the Bay Area with fewer jobs than housing units in 2040 11 ; and 3) Travel patterns are imbalanced resulting in substantially underutilized infrastructure. For example, State Route 4 in East Contra Costa County carries approximately 2.3 times as many vehicles in the commute direction as in the non-commute direction12 • Long and congested commute patterns cause residents to spend more of their time commuting than in other, more valuable activities and contribute substantially to unhealthful and climate-altering emissions. A primary cause of this unbalanced, inefficient and resource-intensive transportation pattern is that it can be difficult to find jobs and housing in close proximity, or to find jobs and housing connected by transit. The potential sales tax measure now under consideration may present an opportunity to better address a root cause of the transportation challenges we face. The Board would like to discuss with the Authority and other stakeholders the possibility of developing policies in the TEP for promoting development that reduces congestion and makes better use of transit and other existing infrastructure. We propose that conversation include two types of approaches: a) funding allocations; and b) new policy incentives. To stimulate discussion, we have included some initial ideas below on each of these two approaches. We would welcome a discussion on these and other ideas that others may have. Initial Ideas on the Funding Allocation Approach: The TEP could allocate a portion of the future funds to a congestion reduction program related to stimulating certain types of new development. Funds for such a program could be used to stimulate certain infill and other development that demonstrates positive impacts on the transportation system, such as reduced demand on the most congested freeways and roads, better 9 MTC's "Vital Signs": Oakley, Brentwood, Antioch, Hercules, Pittsburg 10 ABAG : San Francisco Bay Area: State of the Region: Economy/Population/Housing-2015 (Figure 4 .27 (Jobs to Housing Ratio, Bay Area Counties)) 11 ABAG: Draft Plan Bay Area: Forecast of Jobs, Population, & Housing, March 2013 (Table 14 (SF Bay Area County Housing and Job Growth, 2010-2040)) 12 MTC's Vital Signs March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 30 Julie Pierce, Chair -CCTA November 3, 2015 Page 6 of 8 utilization of transit, greater off-peak utilization, reduced average commute times, and reduction of out-of-county commute trips. This could take the form of development in Priority Development Areas (PDAs) near transit or other types of development that achieve the demand reduction goal. For Contra Costa County, jobs/housing balance is a key concern. A focus on developing employment centers that would offer well-paying jobs proximate to housing (i.e. priority industrial areas or priority employment areas) could have merit. Stimulating development that establishes well-paying jobs in East County, for example, could reduce strain on Highway 4, offer a far easier commute for East County residents and make better use of prior transportation investments by stimulating the counter commute. Subject to feasibility studies, demonstration of congestion reduction, and Authority approvai, iocal jurisdictions could request funding for projects that would stimulate development that would reduce congestion. Such investments could include transportation infrastructure (e.g. improvements to transit and roadways in areas targeted for job growth). However, to realize the congestion reduction benefit of the desired development, a broader range of investments could be considered, such as advanced telecommunication/broadband infrastructure, water, sewer, power, impact fee offsets, land assembly, or other investments. The analysis should consider not only the direct growth in jobs (and housing) likely to result from the investment, but also the net growth in jobs (certain jobs such as advanced manufacturing can have relatively high job multipliers). Initial Ideas on the Policy Incentives Approach: The TEP might include additional policy incentives to promote infill and other development that reduces congestion. For example, the TEP could include incentives for local agencies to adopt and implement certain land-use policies such as PDAs, priority industrial areas or priority employment areas, greater density along transit or employment targets. Alternatively, incentives could be linked to certain TEP funding categories. For instance, economic development/jobs-housing balance/congestion reduction goals could be criteria for allocating funding to any competitively awarded pots of funds. Finally, the Board hopes there can be a discussion regarding if and how the potential measure can address the fundamental shifts in the statewide transportation planning and funding landscape resulting from recent landmark greenhouse gas reduction legislation (for instance the State's replacement of the Level of Service (LOS) metric with a Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT) metric). At this time, it may be appropriate to consider revisions to the Authority's Growth Management Program and Technical Procedures that would incrementally and strategically adapt to the new VMT standard while maintaining the local benefits of the current LOS standard. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 31 Julie Pierce, Chair-CCTA November 3, 2015 Page 7 of 8 The Board would welcome discussion on these and other ideas related to these challenging land use and transportation issues. Bicycle Transportation Issues: Contra Costa County currently has the lowest rate of trips-by-bike rate in the Bay Area according to the MTC 13 • Please consider a strategic approach to developing and prioritizing bicycle project and program activities to reverse this rate to improve the County's ranking. One component of that strategic approach could be to further expand and improve the County's network of separated, Class I trails. These facilities often have a substantial number of users, traveling at varying speeds, on a single path. For example, a "bicycle expressway" could be a separate project in the Iron Horse corridor that would accommodate faster cyclists. This would increase usage, safety, and comfort for both cyclists and pedestrians and merits consideration during development of the TEP. Major Projects: The following is an update to the Board's priority project list transmitted in our October 2014 comment letter. The Board also intends on pursuing these priorities at the appropriate Regional Transportation Planning Committees. The TriLink/State Route 239: This project continues to be a priority. In the interest of advancing a project within a shorter time frame, the Board is requesting that the Vasco- Byron Highway connector phase be prioritized in the TriLink program of projects. The Kirker Pass Road Truck Climbing Lanes: This project addresses congestion and safety along in this critical TRANSPAC and TRANSPLAN connector road. The northbound project, estimated to cost $18 million, is scheduled for construction in 2018 and will provide a northbound truck climbing lane and paved shoulders for future Class II bike lanes between Clearbrook Drive in the City of Concord and the easternmost Hess Road intersection in the unincorporated area. The project is needed to improve safety for motorists and bicyclists along this stretch of road that experiences high truck traffic and is a major commute corridor between Central and East County. With sustained grades steeper than eight percent, trucks are unable to match the speed of other vehicles on the roadway, causing significant congestion and creating a safety hazard. The southbound project will add a truck climbing lane in the opposite direction and is estimated to cost over $20 million. There is no date yet for construction, but project development activities are expected to be started within the next few years. Capitol Corridor Voucher Program: This is a new proposed program that the Board is requesting WCCTAC and CCTA explore. WCCTAC is currently involved in a high capacity transit study that would explicitly or effectively extend BART service in West 13 MTC: Regional Bicycle Plan for the San Francisco Bay Area-2009 Update. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 32 Julie Pierce, Chair -CCTA November 3, 2015 Page 8of8 Contra Costa County. Given that a service expansion of this type is typically a long-term process; a more immediate solution should be considered. The Capitol Corridor Joint Powers Authority (CCJPA) currently operates the Capitol Corridor service through Contra Costa County. In order to provide some service increase to West Contra Cost residents in the short term, a TEP-funded, Capitol Corridor voucher program for Contra Costa residents should be considered. The CCJP A is currently involved in a Capitol Corridor Vision Planning process, which calls for coordination with WCCTAC and CCTA relative to the high capacity transit study. Either the CCJPA planning process or the WCCTAC High Capacity Transit Study may be an appropriate mechanism by which to explore this concept. Marsh Creek Trail: The Board also suggests consideration of an emerging transportation project: a multi-use path in the Marsh Creek corridor that would connect east and west County on or near Marsh Creek Road. This project is in the concept stage and discussion among local jurisdictions has begun. The project would be a significant community asset and may mature enough in the next year to warrant eligibility for funding. The following projects continue to be a priority: North Richmond Truck Route, I- 680 HOV Gap Closure, Iron Horse/Lafayette-Moraga Trail Connector, Vasco Road Safety Improvements, and Northern Waterfront Goods Movement Infrastructure. The Board of Supervisors greatly appreciates staff and consultant assistance during our deliberations on TEP development. We look forward to your response and additional engagement on this critical issue. Sincerely, Gioia, Chair ra Costa County Board of Supervisors Supervisor, District I C: David Twa, County Adntinistrator Sharon Anderson, County Counsel Julie Bueren, Director-Public Works Department John Kopchik, Director -Conservation and Development Patricia Tanquary, CEO -Contra Costa Health Plan Sherry McCoy, Chair-WCCTAC Don Tatzin, Chair-SWAT Robert Taylor, Chair, TRANSPLAN Loella Haskew, Chair-TRANSPAC March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 33 The Board of Supervisors County Administration Building 651 Pine Street. Room 106 Martinez, California 94553 John Gioia, 1 '1 District Candace Andersen, 2"d District Mary N. Piepho, 3"1 District Karen Mitchoff, 411' District Federal D. Glover, 51h Distlict October 21, 2014 Kevin Romick, Chair Contra Costa Transportation Authority 2999 Oak Road, Suite 100 Walnut Creek, CA 94597 Contra Costa County Subject: 2014 Countywide Transportation Plan Update Dear Chair Romick: David Twa Clerk of the Board and County Administrator (925) 335-1900 On September 23, 2014, the Board of Supervisors authorized the Chair to transmit comments on the 2014 update to the Countywide Transportation Plan (CTP). We understand that the CTP is intended to guide the development of the transportation system for the next 25 years. We also understand that this update will result in a list of projects and programs intended to respond to growing population, increasing maintenance demands, and shifting priorities. As an overall comment, the Board of Supervisors would like to thank the Contra Costa Transportation Authority (Authority) for the substantial effort put in to the draft CTP. The CTP raises numerous contemporary issues which should facilitate a productive discussion about our future. The comment letter is comprised of three sections, broad discussion on priorities, chapter by chapter comments, and an attached, Public Review Draft Volume 3: Comprehensive Transportation Project List with comments embedded. PRIORITIES Increased Local Road Funding Needs: Maintenance, Complete Streets, Storm Water Requirements March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 34 Kevin Romick, Chair -CCT A October 21, 2014 Page2of9 Nationally, there is a well-documented, growing need to address our aging infrastructure. On the local level it is no different; we are straining to maintain adequate pavement conditions while being required to be compliant with new water quality, complete streets, and greenhouse gas reduction statutes and initiatives. While the need for adequate maintenance funding is mentioned throughout the document, the scale of the issue warrants a much more prominent discussion in the CTP, particularly given the discussion of new revenue sources. Transit Service Improvements There is increasing pressure to improve transit service due, in part, to new State statutes. As called out in the CTP, our maturing transportation network and land use patterns are at the point where we are facing diminishing returns on roadway capacity. In this light transit investments may be more attractive. Transit agencies in Contra Costa County are likely to need additional resources to respond to this increase in demand for service and the draft CTP acknowledges this unfunded demand. More specific comments: • With conventional fixed route service, a number of potential mitigation measures proposed by the Office of Planning and Research (OPR) in their efforts to implement SB 743 (2013) relate to improved transit service. As acknowledged in the CTP, SB 743 eliminated congestion based transportation impact measures (level of service/LOS) under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). A proposed alternative metric, likely to be Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT), is intended to better reduce greenhouse gas production. However, in Contra Costa, our local policies compel us to continue using LOS in addition to the new impact measures imposed by the State. In order to offset any potential adverse impact on development activity caused by multiple mitigation measures, the Board of Supervisors requests that the Authority explore the possibility of using an expansion of bus service or bus service funding to establish a transit mitigation bank or programmatic VMT mitigation for member agencies. The Board of Supervisors continues to be committed to the policy of having development pay for any facilities required to meet the demands resulting from growth. However, subjecting applicants to the full cost of both LOS and VMT analysis and mitigation may inappropriately constrain needed economic and housing development activities. • Paratransit service for the elderly and people with disabilities, in addition to requiring additional funding, will also require fundamental administrative changes if 1) the Authority is to respond adequately to the projected demand for March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 35 Kevin Romick, Chair -CCT A October 21, 2014 Page 3 of 9 service, and 2) expect that response to be cost-effective. In addition to the oft- cited demographic changes (aging population), the impact on travel demand for this portion of our constituency is likely to be further magnified by the consolidation of medical services and new health trends. The inclusion of these significant challenges would improve the "new challenges", "challenges ahead" sections of the CTP. • The Board of Supervisors is aware of the Authority's efforts to implement the Mobility Management Plan (MMP) which could improve coordination and operating efficiencies of multiple transportation providers. We understand that progress is being made and applaud the efforts of Authority staff in navigating this complex issue. While we recognize that the MMP is mentioned in the Action Plan section of the CTP, given the countywide implications of the MMP a detailed discussion may be warranted in a more prominent place in the document. Surveys conducted in the beginning of the CTP indicated that the Authority should be "more aspirational" in its undertakings. The implementation of a coordinated, countywide mobility management program would be responsive to that direction. Safe Routes to School (SR2S) Program The Authority's Safe Routes to School Master Plan Task Force assisted with the development of a needs assessment to estimate the cost of SR2S projects and programs. The Board of Supervisors thanks the Authority for their leadership on this effort and we look forward to the findings and recommendations being implemented. In order to make better use of past and future SR2S investments, we encourage the Authority to capitalize on one particular finding in the 2011 survey conducted early in the Master Plan effort. The survey established that the most consistent reason cited by parents and school administrators for K-12 students not walking and bicycling to school is related to traffic, either "driver behavior" or "driving too fast". This finding is consistent with statewide and national survey results. The County has developed a 2015 legislative proposal to enhance school zones through expansion and increased penalties. We have met with our legislative delegation on our proposal. The members were supportive of the concept and offered assistance. The County is in the process of securing support from other agencies and we are formally requesting the Authority support in this effort. The goal of the legislation, in combination with existing projects and program, is to assist in reversing the well- known low walk and bike rates to and from K-12 school. This may be another area March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 36 Kevin Romick, Chair -CCTA October 21, 2014 Page 4 of9 where the Authority could be responsive to the "more aspirational" findings in the surveys. Major Projects & Emerging Planning Initiatives A comprehensive response on project priorities can be seen in the attached list. This list includes the Board of Supervisors high priority projects including, but not limited to, TriLink (SR239), North Richmond Truck Route, I-680 HOV Gap Closure, Iron Horse/Lafayette-Moraga Trail Connector, Kirker Pass Road Truck Climbing Lane, Vasco Road Safety Improvements, and Northern Waterfront Goods Movement Infrastructure Projects. In addition to these projects, the Board of Supervisors requests continued Authority advocacy and funding for activities supportive of economic development in areas of the County where such investment is needed and desired by local communities. For instance, this support could fund activities within Priority Development Area (PDAs) and as part of the Northern Waterfront Economic Development Initiative. We are supportive of CTP actions that include planning and implementation funding for transportation projects and programs, infrastructure improvements and other expenditures that facilitate needed economic development. Such investment will help balance jobs and housing and make more efficient use of our transportation infrastructure. The Board of Supervisors considers these efforts as integral to the continued growth of our region and economy. CHAPTER COMMENTS Executive Summary Page ES-3 The telecommuting information is informative; the document would benefit from other relevant changes in commute patterns listed. Nationwide, bicycle commuting has doubled in a shorter time frame than telecommuting and the Authority has more direct responsibility to facilitate further growth in this area. Page ES-13 Sustainable Communities Strategy The Board of Supervisors thanks the Authority for their tireless engagement with the Metropolitan Transportation Commission and the Association of Bay Area Governments on the process to implement SB375. In particular, we encourage continued advocacy for additional resources and consideration for subareas that accommodate a substantial amount of planned growth. For the benefit of our constituents, MTC, and the State, it may be useful to point out in the CTP that our planned growth is, and has March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 37 Kevin Romick, Chair -CCTA October 21, 2014 Page 5 of 9 been for some time, well-managed not through State or regional mandate but through a voter-approved Urban Limit Line and Growth Management Program .. Pages ES-11-14The information on SB 375 (2008) in the document is useful given the land use and transportation emphasis in the legislation. However, we believe that additional focus on AB 32 (2006), in particular the Cap-and-Trade Program, should be included in the CTP. This information could better position the County to receive Program revenues. At a minimum, the relationship between the "transformative" transit investments contemplated in the CTP and the "Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities" and "Transit and Intercity Rail Capital" Cap-and-Trade programs should be strengthened. Prior to contemplating a new transportation sales tax, we believe all other funding opportunities should be examined and maximized to the extent possible in the CTP. As indicated earlier in this letter and acknowledged later in the CTP, SB 743 (2013) is likely to substantially influence how agencies can 1) claim exemption from CEQA and 2) how we will analyze and mitigate the transportation impacts for development. While implementation policies are still being developed by the State; some mention of the issue in the Executive Summary is warranted considering the potential impact on member jurisdictions and the development community. At this time, focus on SB 743 issues is being directed at the State. This is understandable given that implementation strategies are currently being developed. However, once the State's work is finished, focus will shift to local jurisdictions who are ultimately responsible for analyzing and mitigating for VMT. As mentioned earlierin this letter, additional attention should be given to potential mitigation strategies. This would be valuable to both your member agencies and the development community. The Board of Supervisors appreciates the Authority's efforts to engage the State on this critical issue. Page ES-20 Regarding the need to "renew the sales tax measure", prior to establishing this need in policy we ask that the Authority conduct additional outreach to all member jurisdictions, including ail members of the Board Supervisors. As you are aware, the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors has diverse obligations which vary substantially throughout Supervisorial Districts. In considering whether to support such a measure the Board of Supervisors would consider factors such as possible March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 38 Kevin Romick, Chair -CCTA October 21, 2014 Page 6 of9 conflicts with other public finance priorities, and the need for additional transportation funding. Introduction Page 1-15 This section discusses auto-ownership rates and age distribution in the context of demographics. Mention of the increase in the elderly segment of the population, and the impact on transportation needs, would serve to make the demographics discussion more useful in the context of the CTP. Figure 3-1: Roadway Action Plan Projects and Programs The park/open space data used to compile this figure (and other Figures with the same data) is outdated. It is important that the most current dataset is used so that the status of preserved lands relative to planned improvements is understood. This will help avoid conflicts between transportation planning and conservation efforts. Notably, conserved land data is missing from areas around Vasco Road, the Byron Airport, and along Kirker Pass Road south of the City of Pittsburg. A current dataset can be obtained from East Contra Costa County Habitat Conservancy. As I am sure you are aware, many critical transportation projects have received streamlined permitting as a result of this program including Vasco Road Widening, SR- 4/S-160 Connectors, Deer Valley Road safety shoulders, eBART, State Route 4 between Lone Tree and San Jose Avenue (including Sand Creek Interchange), and State Route 4 medians and shoulders from Discovery Bay to Byron Highway. Vision, Goals and Strategy Page I-28 The Board of Supervisors supports the approach described in the "Finding the Right Balance" section. The approach of "Recognizing the differing needs and situations of Contra Costa's subareas ... " has worked well in this diverse County in the past. We expect it to continue to be successful well into the future. Page 1-29 Goall: Movement of people With respect to the language in the first Goal, " ... all available travel modes ... ", the subsequently listed Strategies would be more representative of all modes, and more consistent with Goal 3, if non-motorized facilities were to be addressed in a manner similar to the road system. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 39 Kevin Romick, Chair-CCTA October 21, 2014 Page 7 of 9 For example, "Define and close gaps in the Countywide and Regional Bikeway Network, including gaps in Class I and major off-street paths". In addition, this change would improve internal consistency, in the "Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities" section the following action is highlighted, "Close gaps in the regional trail system ... ". Go all: Movement of Goods Consistent with Authority support for, and assistance with the Northern Waterfront Economic Development Initiative, please include the following language, "Identify new strategies to improve freight movement on freeways, waterways and rail lines to improve air quality and the safety and efficiency of goods movement". Page l-32 The discussion regarding "Maintaining the transportation system" would be more informative and complete if new requirements, often required to be implemented concurrent with maintenance projects, were described in this section. Complete streets and water quality requirements can result in substantially increased maintenance costs. Page l-36 "Our ability to expand the roadway system is extremely limited": In addition to the barriers to roadway expansion listed in this section (limited right-of-way, noise, air pollution, etc.), please include "expanding maintenance obligations". Page 1-41 Transit, Including Buses, Rail, Paratransit, and Ferries As indicated in the Priorities section above, some mention of Authority leadership on the implementation of the MMP would be informative in this section. Page I-51 Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities This section may benefit from a review by the Countywide Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (CBPAC) who could assist in finding solutions to the numerous barriers to improving non-motorized transportation identified in the CTP. The barriers to increased walking and cycling identified in the CTP are not unique to Contra Costa County. These barriers can be addressed through a methodical planning and investment response. The 2009 Update to MTC's Regional Bicycle Plan for the San March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 40 Kevin Romick, Chair-CCTA October 21, 2014 Page 8 of 9 Francisco Bay Area indicates that Contra Costa County is tied with Solano County for the lowest rate of bicycle commuters. A strategic approach to address identified barriers and improve that ranking may be another "aspirational program". As indicated in the draft CTP, the County has numerous attributes that we could capitalize on; excellent climate, favorable topography, an excellent multi-use path network, and second only to Alameda County in terms of numbers of BART stations. On a related note, the Authority may wish to consider combining the Safe Routes to School Master Plan Task Force with the CBPAC to form an "Active Transportation Working Group". The subject matter addressed by the committees is similar and combining the committees may result in a critical mass of issues to address that would ideally lead to regular consultation and collaboration. Page I-61 Facilities for Goods Movement The Board of Supervisors appreciates the Authority's assistance with the Northern Waterfront Economic Development Initiative. Considering the initiative addresses goods movement infrastructure including maritime, rail, and highway projects, some mention of the Northern Waterfront effort would strengthen this section. Page 1-65 The Board of Supervisors welcomes the description of the Comprehensive Transportation Project List (CTPL) as "evolving". As subregional and local priorities change and we are required to respond to changing policies it is essential that we are afforded the flexibility of a "living document". Page 1-105 Implementation The comments in this letter suggest possible chal\\ges to activities listed in the Implementation section including, but not limited to; 1) addition of State policy advocacy, and 2) updates to other Measure J implementation documents as suggested at the Technical Coordinating Committee (Technical Procedures Manual, Measure J Growth Management Implementation Guide, etc). The Board of Supervisors appreciates the outreach of the Authority Board and its staff to obtain comments on the Draft CTP Update and we look forward to additional dialog and engagement on this effort. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 41 Kevin Romick, Chair -CCTA October 21, 2014 Page 9 of 9 Sincerely, ~~ Karen itchoff, Chair Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Supervisor, District IV C: Janet Abelson, Chair-WCCTAC Candace Andersen, Chair-SWAT Salvatore Evola, Chair, TRANSPLAN Mark Ross, Chair-TRANSPAC Attachments: Comments on Volume 3: Comprehensive Transportation Project List Fik: Transp01iution :.:-Transportation> Committees CCTA > CCT A Board or Director~ File; Transpo11ation >Projects> CCT A> CTP 20 [4-15 g:\lransportation\20 I <1ctpupdate\bostocctarc20 I~ ctprinal( ! 0-21-! 4 ).doc March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 42 INITIAL DRAFT Transportation Sales Tax Expenditure Plan (TEP) Commented [MT1]: Version 1 - Posted with EPAC agenda on 2/22/2016 Version 1.1 (This Version) – was posted with EPAC agenda on 2/24/2016. Version 1.1 corrected the allocation assigned to the Community Development Investment Program (added $50 million) and the Regional Choice Category (deducted $50 million) and made other non-substantive changes. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 43 TEP Outline • Executive summary (to be completed at a later date) • The Contra Costa Transportation Sales Tax Expenditure Plan o Table of Expenditure Plan Allocations o Summary of Projects and Programs (to be completed at a later date) o Detailed Descriptions of Funding Categories o Growth Management Program  Attachment A - Principles of Agreement for Establishing the Urban Limit Line o Complete Streets Program o Regional Advance Environmental Mitigation Program o Governing Structure o Implementing Guidelines Commented [MT2]: A brief Executive Summary will be included in the final TEP document. This was a one page summary in the 2004 Measure J TEP document March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 44 TABLE OF EXPENDITURE PLAN ALLOCATIONS Funding Category $ (millions)% Local Streets Maintenance and Improvements 540 23.1% Major Streets and Complete Streets Project Grants 200 8.6% BART Capacity, Access and Parking Improvements 300 12.8% East Contra Costa Transit Extension 70 3.0% Transit & Interchange Improvements along the I-80 Corridor in West County 110 4.7% Improve traffic flow & implement high capacity transit in the I-680 corridor 140 6.0% Improve traffic flow along the SR 242 and SR 4 Corridors in Central and Eastern County 70 3.0% Interstate 680 and State Route 4 Interchange Improvements 60 2.6% East County Corridor – provide a high 117 5.0% Advance Mitigation Program TBD TBD Non-Rail Transit Enhancements 200 8.6% Transportation for Seniors and People with Disabilities 50 2.1% Safe Transportation for Children 50 2.1% Intercity Rail and Ferry Service 50 2.1% Pedestrian, Bicycle and Trail Facilities 60 2.6% Community Development Investment Grant Program 140 6.0% Innovative Transportation Technology / Connected Communities Grant Program 65 2.8% Transportation Planning, Facilities & Services 23 1.0% Regional Choice 70 3.0% Administration 23 1.0% TOTAL 2338 100.0% Notes • Advance Mitigation Program - Projects that would be included in an Advance Mitigation Program will be called out/ identified • Regional Choice – This category is a placeholder for funds intended to be assigned by the RTPCs either to 1) high priority local projects/ programs unique to that subregion or 2) to augment funding assigned to other categories in this draft TEP to better reflect local priorities and needs March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 45 in that subregion. Projects / program descriptions will ultimately be blended in to the final draft TEP) (version 1.1 includes the reduction of $50m to this category, bringing total program to $70m) • Commute Alternatives – This program is not proposed in TEP as a countywide funded category. Funds may be assigned from Regional Choice category for this type of program. • TLC – This program not proposed in TEP. A new program (Community Development Investment Grant Program) is proposed to be included in TEP. • CDI – Community Development Investment Program is a new category. It is intended to provide funding for housing incentives and job creation programs/ investments (see details on following pages) (version 1.1 includes the addition of $50m to this category, bringing total program to $140m) . March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 46 Detailed Descriptions of Funding Categories The Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA) is responsible for maintaining and improving the county’s transportation system by planning, funding, and delivering critical transportation infrastructure projects and programs. The funding categories detailed below will provide needed improvements to connect our communities, foster a strong economy, increase sustainability, and safely and efficiently get people where they need to go. Funding Categories 1. Local Streets Maintenance & Improvements ----- 23.1% ($540m) Funds from this category will fund maintenance and improvement projects on local streets and roads and may be used for any eligible transportation purposes as defined under the Act and to comply with the GMP requirements. The Authority will distribute 23.1 percent of the annual sales tax revenues to all local jurisdictions with a base allocation of $100,000 for each jurisdiction, the balance will be distributed based 50 percent on relative population and 50 percent on road miles for each jurisdiction, subject to compliance with the Authority’s reporting, audit and GMP requirements, consistent with the current Measure J program. Population figures used shall be the most current available from the State Department of Finance. Road mileage shall be from the most current State Controller’s Annual Report of Financial Transactions for Streets and Roads. Funds shall be used by each jurisdiction to maintain and enhance existing roadway and other transportation facilities. Jurisdictions shall comply with the Authority’s Maintenance of Effort (MOE) policy as well as Implementation Guidelines of this TEP. Local agencies will report on the use of these funds, such as the amount spent on roadway maintenance, bicycle and pedestrian facilities, transit facilities, and other roadway improvements. 2. Major Streets/ Complete Streets/ Traffic Signal Synchronization Grant Program ----- $200m Funds from this category shall be used to fund improvements to major thoroughfares throughout Contra Costa to improve the safe, efficient and reliable movement of buses, vehicles, bicyclists and pedestrians along said corridors (i.e. traffic smoothing). Eligible projects include but, are not limited to installation of bike and pedestrian facilities, synchronization of traffic signals and other technology solutions to manage traffic, traffic calming and pedestrian safety improvements, shoulders, sidewalks, curbs and gutters, streetscapes and bus transit facility enhancements such as bus turnouts and passenger amenities. As an element of this program, the CCTA will adopt a ‘traffic signal synchronization’ program and award grants for installation of ‘state of the art’ technology oriented at smoothing the flow of traffic along major arterial roadways throughout the county. Funding from this program will be prioritized to projects that improve access (all modes) to transit stations and transit March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 47 oriented communities. Priority will be given to projects that can show a high percentage of ‘other funding’ allocated to the project (i.e. – leverage). All projects funded through this program must demonstrate compliance with CCTA’s Complete Streets program and include complete street elements whenever possible. 3. BART Capacity, Access and Parking Improvements ---- $300m Funds from this category shall be used to construct improvements to the BART system such as: station access improvements; station related safety and operational improvements; additional on or off site parking; development and implementation of last mile connections (including shuttles, transit stops, and bicycle / pedestrian facilities – complete streets) oriented at providing BART users alternatives to driving alone / parking single occupant vehicles. Funds in this category may be used for the acquisition of new BART cars and/or advanced train control systems that can be shown to increase capacity on BART lines serving Contra Costa, provided that 1) BART agrees to fund CCTA identified improvements from other BART revenues and 2) a regional approach, that includes funding commitments from both Alameda and San Francisco Counties, must be developed and implemented prior to any funds from this measure being used to fund the acquisition of BART cars. 4. East Contra Costa Transit Extension (BART or alternative) ------- $70m Funding from this category shall be used to extend BART or other high capacity transit service easterly from the existing Hillcrest Station in Antioch through Oakley to a new station in Brentwood. To the greatest degree possible, local funds generated by this measure shall be used to leverage additional regional, state and/or federal funds for this project. Funds from this category may be used to complete an interim transit station in Brentwood as well as to fund improvements to the Pittsburg and /or Antioch stations. Funds in this category may be used for the acquisition of new BART cars and/or advanced train control systems that can be shown to increase capacity on BART lines serving Contra Costa, provided that 1) BART agrees to fund CCTA identified improvements from other BART revenues and 2) a regional approach, that includes funding commitments from both Alameda and San Francisco Counties, must be developed and implemented prior to any funds from this measure being used to fund the acquisition of BART cars. RAMP eligible project. 5. Transit and Interchange Improvements along the I-80 Corridor in West Contra Costa ----- $110m Funding from this category shall be allocated by the Authority to projects/ programs (including state of the art technology) that improve traffic flow along the Interstate 80 corridor as well as nearby major streets and/or intersections and reduce congestion, increase mobility and provide alternatives for single occupant vehicle travel. Final determination on the scope of the improvements to be constructed will be based on the final recommendations in the West County High Capacity Transit Study. To the greatest degree possible, local funds generated by this measure shall be used to leverage additional regional, state and/or federal funds for this project. RAMP eligible project. Commented [WRG3]: For discussion only – amount subject to change. $300m is consistent with discussions w/ BART to date. Commented [MT4]: Eligibility for this project will include projects and programs that result from the West County High Capacity Transit Study (including transit operational costs). March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 48 6. Improve traffic flow and implement high capacity transit along the Interstate 680 corridor in Central and Southwest County ----- $140m Funding from this category shall be used to implement the I-680 corridor express lane and operational improvement project to facilitate car pools and/or increased transit use in the corridor and discourage single occupant driving; funding may also be used implement high capacity transit improvements in the corridor (including those identified in the I-680 transit options and other relevant studies); funding may also be used to complete improvements to the mainline freeway and/or local interchanges as may be required to implement express lane and/or transit projects as well as advanced traffic management programs and/or other projects or programs that encourage the use of connected vehicle and/or autonomous vehicles in the corridor provided that the project sponsor can show that they reduce congestion, increase mobility and provide alternatives to single occupant vehicle travel. Selection of final project to be based on a performance analysis of project alternatives consistent with CCTA requirements. To the greatest degree possible, local funds generated by this measure shall be used to leverage additional regional, state and/or federal funds for this project. RAMP eligible project. 7. Improve traffic flow along the SR 242 and SR 4 Corridors in Central and Eastern Contra Costa County ----- $70m Funding from this category shall be used to improve traffic flow and reduce congestion between Concord and Brentwood along the State Route 242 and State Route 4 to reduce congestion, increase mobility and provide alternatives to single occupant vehicle travel. To the greatest degree possible, local funds generated by this measure shall be used to leverage additional regional, state and/or federal funds for this project. Advanced traffic management programs and/or other projects or programs that encourage the use of connected vehicle and/or autonomous vehicles in the corridor are eligible for funding from this category provided that the project sponsor can demonstrate that they reduce congestion, increase mobility and provide alternatives to single occupant vehicle travel. Selection of final project to be based on a performance analysis of project alternatives consistent with CCTA requirements. RAMP eligible project. 8. Interstate 680 / State Route 4 Interchange ----- $60m Funding from this category shall be used to implement the Interstate 680/ State Route 4 interchange improvement project as necessary to improve traffic flow and enhance traffic safety along both the I-680 and SR 4 corridors. To the greatest degree possible, local funds generated by this measure shall be used to leverage additional regional, state and/or federal funds for this project. CCTA shall prioritize local funding commitments to this project in such a way as to encourage carpools and vanpools, public transit usage and other alternatives to the single occupant vehicle. RAMP eligible project. 9. East County Corridor (Vasco Rd and/or Byron Highway Corridors) ----- $117m Funding from this category shall be used to complete capacity and/or safety improvements to the Vasco Road and/or the Byron Highway (Tri-Link) Corridors oriented at providing better connectivity between eastern Contra Costa and the Interstate 580 corridor in Alameda and San Joaquin counties. Funds from this category may be used to upgrade existing facilities and to complete a new connection March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 49 between the two corridors provided such a connection can be demonstrated to improve traffic flow and/or safety along either or both of the corridors. Selection of final project to be based on a performance analysis of project alternatives consistent with CCTA requirements. To the greatest degree possible, local funds generated by this measure shall be used to leverage additional regional, state and/or federal funds for this project. At its sole discretion, the Authority may allocate up to 5% of funding from this category to the study and implement high capacity transit along either or both of these corridors. Prior to the use of any local sales tax funds to implement capacity improvements to either or both of these corridors, the Authority must find that the project includes measures to prevent growth outside of the Urban Limit Lines (ULL) in effect at the time of passage of this measure. Such measures might include, but not necessarily be limited to, limits on roadway access in areas outside the ULL, purchase of abutters’ rights of access, preservation of critical habitat and/or the acquisition of open space. Any investments affecting facilities in Alameda or San Joaquin Counties will be done in partnership with those jurisdictions. RAMP eligible project. 10. Advance Mitigation Program ---- TBD The Authority will develop a policy supporting the creation of an advance mitigation program to establish a program to provide for large-scale acquisition and management of critical habitat areas and to create a reliable approach for funding required mitigation for future transportation. This policy will identify projects that will benefit from the program and the financial contribution associated with those projects. This approach would be implemented by obtaining coverage for transportation projects through existing and proposed multiple species conservation plans, including the East Contra Costa Habitat Conservation Plan. The benefit of this policy will include an early comprehensive project delivery review, reduced costs attributed to mitigation, opportunity to significantly improve conservation benefits, and accelerated project delivery. If this approach cannot be fully implemented, then the identified funds shall be used for environmental mitigation purposes on a project by project basis. 11. Non-Rail Transit Enhancements ---- 8.6% ($200m) This category of funding is intended to provide funding to non-rail transit service alternatives that can be shown to reduce total vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and/or greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Funding will be provided to non-rail transit services/projects that can demonstrate innovative approaches to maximizing the movement of people within the existing transportation infrastructure. Funding can be used to deliver transit capital projects or implement service to transit stations, congested corridors, last mile service to transit hubs and established transit integrated communities. Funding will be allocated by the Authority to Contra Costa transit operators based on performance criteria established by the Authority in consultation with local and regional transit operators and key stakeholders. Funding allocations will be reviewed on a regular basis. Said performance criteria shall require a finding that any proposed new or enhanced services demonstrate the ability to improve regional and/or local mobility for Contra Costa residents. Funds may be used to March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 50 deliver transit capital projects or operate service improvements identified in the adopted plans of an operator or of the Authority. Guidelines will be established so that revenues will fund service enhancements in Contra Costa. The guidelines may require provisions such as; operational efficiencies including greater coordination; promoting and developing a seamless service; increasing service frequencies on appropriate routes; and specified performance criteria and reporting requirements. Services funded in this program will be reviewed every two years to ensure the goals of the program are being met. Recipients of funding under this category are required to participate in the development of the Accessible Transportation Services Strategic Plan included in Category 12. Transportation for Seniors and People with Disabilities. 12. Transportation for Seniors & People With Disabilities ----- 2.1% ($50m) Transportation for Seniors & People With Disabilities or what is often referred to as “Paratransit” services or Accessible Transportation Services (ATS) can be broadly divided into two categories: (1) services required to be provided by transit operators under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) to people functionally unable to ride fixed route service; and (2) services not required by law but necessary for frail seniors and people with disabilities whose needs are beyond the requirements of the ADA (for example, extra hours of service or greater geographic coverage or requirement for service beyond curb-to-curb), or for non-ADA eligible seniors. Projections indicate that people that would be eligible for these services is the fasts growing segment of our population and will likely (blank) over the next (blank) years. Funding in this category will be used to fund accessible transportation services. These services shall support both non-ADA and ADA services for eligible participants. To ensure services are delivered in a coordinated system that maximizes both service delivery and efficiency an Accessible Transportation Service (ATS) Strategic Plan will be developed and periodically updated during the term of the measure. No funding under this category will be allocated until the ATS Strategic Plan has been developed and adopted. An overarching component in the development and delivery of the ATS Strategic Plan is using mobility management to ensure coordination and efficiencies in accessible service delivery. The plan will evaluate the appropriate model for our local structure including how accessible services are delivered by all agencies and where appropriate coordination can improve transportation services, eliminate gaps in service and find efficiencies in the service delivered. The ATS Strategic Plan would also determine the investments and oversight of the program funding and identify timing, projects, service delivery options, administrative structure, and fund leverage opportunities. Commented [MT5]: Continuing to refine language for this item to better reflect consistency with the other sections of the TEP March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 51 13. Safe Transportation for Children ----- 2.1% ($50m) Programs and projects which promote safe transportation options for children to access schools or after school programs. Eligible projects include but are not limited to transit passes and transit incentive programs, school bus programs, and projects for pedestrian and bicycle safety that provide school-related access. 14. Intercity Rail/ Ferries ---- $50m Funds from this category shall be used to construct station and/or track improvements to the Capitol Corridor and/or the San Joaquin corridors as well as to implement new or improved ferry services (including both capital and operations) in Richmond, Hercules, Martinez and/or Antioch. To the greatest degree possible, local funds generated by this measure shall be used to leverage additional regional, state and/or federal funds for this project. Any projects funded in this category will be evaluated by CCTA and demonstrate progress toward the Authority’s goals of reducing VMT and green-house gas reductions. Selection of final project to be based on a performance analysis of project alternatives consistent with CCTA requirements. Sponsors of projects requesting funding from this category will be required to demonstrate to the Authority that sufficient funding is available to operate the proposed project and/or service over a long period of time. 15. Pedestrian, Bicycle and Trail Facilities ---- 2.6% ($60m) Two-thirds of the funds from this program will be used implement projects in the Countywide Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan, consistent with the current Measure J program. These funds will be allocated competitively to projects that improve safety for pedestrians and bicyclists, serve the greatest number of users and significant destinations, and remove missing segments and existing barriers to walking and bicycling. The review process shall also consider project feasibility and readiness and the differing needs of the sub-regions when identifying projects for funding. Funding available through this program shall be primarily used for the construction, maintenance, and safety or other improvements of bicycle, pedestrian and trail projects. No design, project approval, right-of-way purchase and environmental clearance may only shall be funded as part of a construction project. Planning to identify a preferred alignment for major new bicycle, pedestrian or trail connections may also be funded through this program. One third of the funds are to be allocated to the East Bay Regional Park District (EBRPD) for the development and rehabilitation of paved regional trails. EBRPD is to spend its allocation proportionally in each sub-region, subject to the review and approval of the applicable sub-regional committee, prior to funding allocation by the Authority. The Authority in conjunction with EBRPD will develop a maintenance- of-effort requirement for funds under this category. Consistent with the Countywide Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan and the complete streets policy established in this expenditure plan, project sponsors receiving funding through other funding categories in this Plan shall incorporate, whenever possible, pedestrian, bicycle, and trail facilities into their projects. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 52 16. Community Development Incentive (CDI) Program----- 3.86.0% ($90m140m) Funds from this category will be used implement this new Community Development Incentive program, administered by the Authority’s Regional Transportation Planning Committees (RTPC’s). Funds will be allocated on a competitive basis to transportation projects or programs that promote economic development, job creation and/or housing within established (or planned) transit supportive community centers. Project sponsors must demonstrate that at least 20% of the project is funded from other than local transportation sales tax revenue and the Authority will prioritize funding to projects that demonstrate over 50% funding from other sources. Additional priority will be given to projects where the sponsor can demonstrate that the project supports and facilitates development of housing for all income levels. Working with the RTPCs, the Authority will prepare guidelines and establish overall criteria for the program. 17. Innovative Transportation Technology / Connected Communities Program ----- 2.8% ($65m) Funding from this category will be allocated for the planning and development of projects and programs that include innovative solutions intended to (a) develop and demonstrate transportation innovation through real-world applications, (b) reduce GHG emissions, and (c) implement connected transportation solutions and integrate this approach with other community services such as public safety, public services, water, communications and energy to promote economic development and jobs opportunities by increasing government efficiency and reducing consumption. Examples of eligible projects include but are not limited to expanding opportunities for electric vehicle charging; smart rideshare, carshare and bikeshare services; on-demand and personal transit services that compliment traditional fixed-route transit; smart and automated parking; intelligent, sensor-based infrastructure; smart payment systems; and data sharing to improve mobility choices for all users. Projects are intended to promote connectivity between all users of the transportation network (cars, pedestrians, bikes, buses, trucks, etc.) and automation technologies that collectively facilitate the transformation toward connected communities. Funding is intended to match State, federal, or regional grants and private-sector investment to achieve maximum benefits. By investing in these solutions Contra Costa County can become a national model in sustainable, technology-enabled transportation. A minimum of twenty-five percent shall be allocated to each sub-program (a, b and c above) over the life of the measure. The Authority will prepare guidelines and establish overall criteria for the Innovative Transportation Technology / Connected Communities Program and provide technical resources to project sponsors. The RTPC’s will submit programs/projects for the Authority to consider allocating funds to on a competitive basis for each of the sub-programs. Project sponsors must demonstrate that the programs provide highly efficient services that are cost effective, integrated and responsive to the needs of the community. Commented [WG6]: UNRESOLVED ISSUE This is a proposed new grant program that was developed as an alternative to augmenting the existing Transportation for Livable Communities program. This new program is intended to stimulate infill development and would complement another proposal to augment a jurisdiction’s return to source funding in exchange for compliance with specified housing goals or other ‘to be determined’ actions intended to incentivize the development of housing. Augmenting return to source for this purpose is an unresolved issue that is not included in this initial Draft TEP. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 53 18. Transportation Planning, Facilities and Services ----- 1.0% ($23m) Implement the countywide GMP, prepare the countywide transportation plan; and support the programming and monitoring of federal and state funds, as well as the Authority’s Congestion Management Agency functions. 19. Regional Choice ---- $120m70m This category is a placeholder for funds intended to be assigned by the RTPCs either to 1) high priority local projects/ programs unique to that subregion or 2) to augment funding assigned to other categories in this draft TEP to better reflect local priorities and needs in that subregion. NOTE – these project/ program descriptions will ultimately be blended in to the final draft TEP 20. Administration ---- 1.0% ($23m) Funds administration of new measure. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 54 The Growth Management Program Goals and Objectives The overall goal of the Growth Management Program is to preserve and enhance the quality of life and promote a healthy, strong economy to benefit the people and areas of Contra Costa through a cooperative, multi-jurisdictional process for managing growth, while maintaining local authority over land use decisions.1 The objectives of the Growth Management Program are to: • Assure that new residential, business and commercial growth pays for the facilities required to meet the demands resulting from that growth. • Require cooperative transportation and land use planning among Contra Costa County, cities, towns, and transportation agencies. • Support land use patterns within Contra Costa that make more efficient use of the transportation system, consistent with the General Plans of local jurisdictions. • Support infill and redevelopment in existing urban and brownfield areas. Components To receive its share of Local Transportation Maintenance and Improvement funds and to be eligible for Contra Costa Transportation for Livable Communities funds, each jurisdiction must: 1. Adopt a Growth Management Element Each jurisdiction must adopt, or maintain in place, a Growth Management Element as part of its General Plan that outlines the jurisdiction’s goals and policies for managing growth and requirements for achieving those goals. The Growth Management Element must show how the jurisdiction will comply with sections 2–7 below. The Authority will refine its model Growth Management Element and administrative procedures in consultation with the Regional Transportation Planning Committees to reflect the revised Growth Management Program. Each jurisdiction is encouraged to incorporate other standards and procedures into its Growth Management Element to support the objectives and required components of this Growth Management Program. 1 The Authority will, to the extent possible, attempt to harmonize the Growth Management and the State-mandated Congestion Management Programs. To the extent they conflict, Congestion Management Program Activities shall take precedence over Growth Management activities. Commented [WRG7]: This language reflects the current CCTA Growth Management program as approved with Measures C and J and subsequently updated by the Authority. CCTA staff will be suggesting updates to align this program with current practice. Commented [WG8]: Some EPAC members have asked for clarification on schedule for periodic review/ update of GM elements (5yr, 10yr, ??). March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 55 2. Adopt a Growth Management Mitigation Program Each jurisdiction must adopt, or maintain in place, a development mitigation program to ensure that new growth is paying its share of the costs associated with that growth. This program shall consist of both a local program to mitigate impacts on local streets and other facilities and a regional program to fund regional and subregional transportation projects, consistent with the Countywide Comprehensive Transportation Plan. The jurisdiction’s local development mitigation program shall ensure that revenue provided from this measure shall not be used to replace private developer funding that has or would have been committed to any project. The regional development mitigation program shall establish fees, exactions, assessments or other mitigation measures to fund regional or subregional transportation improvements needed to mitigate the impacts of planned or forecast development. Regional mitigation programs may adjust such fees, exactions, assessments or other mitigation measures when developments are within walking distance of frequent transit service or are part of a mixed-use development of sufficient density and with necessary facilities to support greater levels of walking and bicycling. Each Regional Transportation Planning Committee shall develop the regional development mitigation program for its region, taking account of planned and forecast growth and the Multimodal Transportation Service Objectives and actions to achieve them established in the Action Plans for Routes of Regional Significance. Regional Transportation Planning Committees may use existing regional mitigation programs, if consistent with this section, to comply with the Growth Management Program. 3. Address Housing Options Each jurisdiction shall demonstrate reasonable progress in providing housing opportunities for all income levels as part of a report on the implementation of the actions outlined in its adopted Housing Element. The report will demonstrate progress by: a. Comparing the number of housing units approved, constructed or occupied within the jurisdiction over the preceding five years with the number of units needed on average each year to meet the housing objectives established in the jurisdiction’s Housing Element; or b. Illustrating how the jurisdiction has adequately planned to meet the existing and projected housing needs through the adoption of land use plans and regulatory systems which provide opportunities for, and do not unduly constrain, housing development; or c. Illustrating how a jurisdiction’s General Plan and zoning regulations facilitate the improvement and development of sufficient housing to meet those objectives. In addition, each jurisdiction shall consider the impacts that its land use and development policies have on the local, regional and countywide transportation system, including the Commented [MT9]: Some EPAC members are recommending a review and enhancement of the reporting requirements, such as actual housing production compared against targets. Commented [WG10]: EPAC has suggested a number of edits to align the Authority’s requirements related to the provision of Affordable Housing with current statutory requirements. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 56 level of transportation capacity that can reasonably be provided, and shall incorporate policies and standards into its development approval process that support transit, bicycle and pedestrian access in new developments. 4. Participate in an Ongoing C ooperative, M ulti-J urisdictional P lanning P rocess. Each jurisdiction shall participate in an ongoing process with other jurisdictions and agencies, the Regional Transportation Planning Committees and the Authority to create a balanced, safe and efficient transportation system and to manage the impacts of growth. Jurisdictions shall work with the Regional Transportation Planning Committees to: a. Identify Routes of Regional Significance, and establish Multimodal Transportation Service Objectives for those routes and actions for achieving those objectives. b. Apply the Authority’s travel demand model and technical procedures to the analysis of General Plan Amendments (GPAs) and developments exceeding specified thresholds for their effect on the regional transportation system, including on Action Plan objectives. c. Create the development mitigation programs outlined in section 2 above. d. Help develop other plans, programs and studies to address other transportation and growth management issues. In consultation with the Regional Transportation Planning Committees, each jurisdiction will use the travel demand model to evaluate changes to local General Plans and the impacts of major development projects for their effects on the local and regional transportation system and the ability to achieve the Multimodal Transportation Service Objectives established in the Action Plans. Jurisdictions shall also participate in the Authority’s ongoing countywide comprehensive transportation planning process. As part of this process, the Authority shall support countywide and subregional planning efforts, including the Action Plans for Routes of Regional Significance, and shall maintain a travel demand model. Jurisdictions shall help maintain the Authority’s travel demand modeling system by providing information on proposed improvements to the transportation system and planned and approved development within the jurisdiction. 5. Adopt an Urban Limit Line (ULL) Beginning on April 1, 2009, each jurisdiction must continuously comply with an applicable, voter approved ULL (“applicable ULL”) defined as one of the following: a. A new mutually-agreed upon countywide ULL (MAC-ULL) approved by the voters countywide; or b. A Contra Costa County, voter approved ULL (“County ULL”) that has also Commented [MT11]: Though not necessarily needed in the GMP document, propose that the Authority’s travel demand model and technical procedures be amended/ updated to reflect current statutory requirements (VMT analysis vs LOS analysis) as well as industry ‘best practices’. Explore with EPAC, CCTA staff and technical experts. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 57 been approved by a majority of the voters voting on the measure in the local jurisdiction seeking to rely upon the line as the growth boundary for local development, provided that the local jurisdiction’s legislative body has adopted the County ULL before or after the election at which the “County ULL” was approved; or c. A measure placed on the ballot and approved by a majority of the voters within a local jurisdiction fixing a local voter approved ULL (“LV-ULL”) or equivalent urban growth boundary for the jurisdiction. A jurisdiction may establish or revise its LV-ULL with local voter approval at any time prior to or during the term of Measure J. The LV- ULL will be used as of its effective date to meet the Measure J GMP ULL requirement. Each of the above options is more fully defined in the Principles of Agreement, which are attached and incorporated by reference as Attachment “A”. Submittal of an annexation request by a local jurisdiction to LAFCO outside the applicable ULL will constitute non-compliance with the Measure J Growth Management Program. 6. Develop a Five-Year Capital Improvement Program Each jurisdiction shall prepare and maintain a capital improvement program that outlines the capital projects needed to implement the goals and policies of the jurisdiction’s General Plan for at least the following five-year period. The Capital Improvement Program shall include approved projects and an analysis of the costs of the proposed projects as well as a financial plan for providing the improvements. The jurisdiction shall forward the transportation component of its capital improvement program to the Authority for incorporation into the Authority’s database of transportation projects. 7. Adopt a Transportation Systems Management (TSM) Ordinance or Resolution To promote carpools, vanpools and park and ride lots, each jurisdiction shall adopt a local ordinance or resolution that conforms to the model Transportation Systems Management Ordinance that the Transportation Authority has drafted and adopted. Upon approval of the Authority, cities with a small employment base may adopt alternative mitigation measures in lieu of a TSM ordinance or resolution. Allocation of Funds Portions of the monies received from the retail transaction and use tax will be returned to the local jurisdictions (the cities and the county) for use on local, subregional and/or regional transportation improvements and maintenance projects. Receipt of all such funds requires compliance with the Growth Management Program described below. The funds are to be distributed on a formula based on population and road miles. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 58 Each jurisdiction shall demonstrate its compliance with all of the components of the Growth Management Program in a completed compliance checklist. The jurisdiction shall submit, and the Authority shall review and make findings regarding the juris- diction’s compliance with the requirements of the Growth Management Program, consistent with the Authority’s adopted policies and procedures. If the Authority determines that the jurisdiction complies with the requirements of the Growth Management Program, it shall allocate to the jurisdiction its share of local street maintenance and improvement funding. Jurisdictions may use funds allocated under this provision to comply with these administrative requirements. If the Authority determines that the jurisdiction does not comply with the requirements of the Growth Management Program, the Authority shall withhold those funds and also make a finding that the jurisdiction shall not be eligible to receive Contra Costa Transportation for Livable Communities until the Authority determines the jurisdiction has achieved compliance. The Authority’s findings of noncompliance may set deadlines and conditions for achieving compliance. Withholding of funds, reinstatement of compliance, reallocation of funds and treatment of unallocated funds shall be as established in adopted Authority’s policies and procedures. Commented [MT12]: This portion of the Authority’s Growth Management Program will need to be updated to reflect the projects/ programs defined this this TEP. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 59 Attachment A Principles of Agreement for Establishing the Urban Limit Line An applicable ULL shall be defined as an urban limit line, urban growth boundary, or other equivalent physical boundary judged by the Authority to clearly identify the physical limits of the local jurisdiction’s area, including future urban development. Initial Action 1. The Board of Supervisors shall have, with the concurrence of each affected city, adjusted the existing County ULL on or before September 30, 2004, or as expeditiously as possible given the requirements of CEQA, to make the existing County ULL coterminous with city boundaries where it previously intruded inside those incorporated boundaries. Establishing a Mutually Agreed-Upon Countywide urban limit line (“MAC-ULL”) 2. The process to develop a MAC ULL shall have begun by July 1, 2004 with meetings in each sub region between one elected representative of each city and the county. The subregional meeting(s) will be followed by meetings between all of the cities and the county, each being represented by one elected representative. The discussion will include both the suggested ULL as well as criteria for establishing the line and future modifications to the ULL. 3. On or before December 31, 2004, the County and the cities will cooperate in the development of a new MAC-ULL and criteria for future modifications. To be considered a final proposal, the plan must be approved by 4 members of the Board of Supervisors and ¾ of the cities representing ¾ of the incorporated population. 4. The County will be the lead agency in connection with any required environmental review and clearance on the proposed MAC-ULL. 5. After completion of the environmental review process, the proposal shall be submitted to the voters for ratification by November 2006. 6. The MAC-ULL will include provisions for periodic review (5 years) as well as provisions for minor (less than 30 acres) nonconsecutive adjustments. 7. If there is a MAC-ULL, and a Town or City disagrees with that MAC-ULL, it may develop and submit a “LV- ULL” (see 8.b, below), or rely upon an existing voter approved ULL. Commented [WRG13]: This is a major discussion point – various options being considered. No changes to ULL principals are proposed for consideration at this point in time. Commented [WG14]: Some on EPAC have suggested that the exemption for minor (less than 30 acres) adjustments be eliminated. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 60 Alternatives if there is no Voter Approved MAC-ULL or if a Local Jurisdiction chooses Not to Concur with a Voter-Approved MAC-ULL 8. If no MAC-ULL is established by March 31, 2009, only local jurisdictions with one of the following applicable voter approved ULLs will be eligible to receive the 18% return to source funds or the 5% TLC funds. a. County ULL. A ULL placed on the ballot by the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors, adopted at a countywide election and in effect through the applicable GMP compliance period, as its boundaries apply to the local jurisdiction, if: : i. That ULL was approved by a majority of the local jurisdiction’s voters, either through a separate ballot measure or as part of the countywide election at which the measure was approved; ii. The legislative body of the City or Town has accepted and approved, for purposes of compliance with the Measure J GMP, the County ULL boundaries for urban development as its applicable, voter approved ULL; iii. Revisions to a City or Town’s adopted County ULL boundary requires fulfillment of provisions (8.a.i) and (8.a.ii) above in their entirety; and iv. A City of Town may adopt conditions for revising its adopted County ULL boundary by action of the City or Town’s legislative body, provided that the conditions limit the revisions of the physical boundary to adjustments of 30 or fewer acres, and/or to address issues of unconstitutional takings, or conformance to state and federal law. Such conditions may be adopted at the time of adoption of the County ULL, or subsequently through amendment to the City or Town’s Growth Management Element to its General Plan. b. Local Voter ULL (LV-ULL). A local ULL or equivalent measure placed on the local jurisdiction ballot, approved by the jurisdiction’s voters, and recognized by action of the local jurisdiction’s legislative body as it’s applicable, voter approved ULL. A jurisdiction may revise or establish a new LV-ULL at any time using the procedure defined in this paragraph. c. Adjustments of 30 Acres or Less. A local jurisdiction can undertake adjustments of 30 acres or less to its adopted ULL, consistent with these Principles, without voter approval. However, any adjustment greater than 30 acres requires voter approval and completion of the full County ULL or LV-ULL procedure as outlined above. Commented [MT15]: This portion of the Authority’s Growth Management Program will need to be updated to reflect the projects/ programs defined this this TEP. Commented [WG16]: See prior note, some on EPAC have suggested that the exemption for minor (less than 30 acres) adjustments be eliminated. Commented [WG17]: See prior note March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 61 Conditions of Compliance 9. Submittal of an annexation request by a local jurisdiction to LAFCO outside of an applicable voter approved ULL will constitute non-compliance with the new Measure J Growth Management Plan. 10. For each jurisdiction, an applicable ULL shall be in place through each Measure J Growth Management Program compliance period in order for the local jurisdiction to be eligible to receive the 18% return to source and the TLC funds for that period. Commented [MT18]: This portion of the Authority’s Growth Management Program will need to be updated to reflect the projects/ programs defined this this TEP. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 62 Complete Streets Policy Vision This Plan envisions a transportation system in which each component provides safe, comfortable and convenient access for every user allowed to use it. These users include pedestrians, bicyclists, transit riders, automobile drivers and their passengers, and truckers, and people of varying abilities, including children, seniors, people with disabilities and able-bodied adults. Every transportation project is an opportunity to create safer, more accessible streets for all users and shall be planned, designed, constructed and operated to take advantage of that opportunity. Policy To achieve this vision, all recipients of funding through this Plan shall consider and accommodate, wherever feasible, the needs of all users in the planning, design, construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation, maintenance, and operation of the transportation system. The determination of feasibility shall be consistent with the exceptions listed below. Achieving this vision will require balancing the needs of different users, and may require reductions in capacity for automobiles. The Authority shall revise its project development guidelines to require the consideration and accommodation of all users in the design, construction and operation of projects funded with Measure funds. The revised guidelines will allow flexibility in responding to the context of each project and the needs of users specific to the project’s context. To ensure that this policy is carried out, the Authority shall prepare a checklist that sponsors of projects using Measure funds must submit that documents how the needs of all users were considered and how they were accommodated in the design, construction and operation of the project. If the proposed project or program will not improve conditions for all users, the sponsor shall document the reasons why in the checklist, consistent with the following section on “exceptions” below. The completed checklist shall be made part of the approval of programming of funding for the project or funding allocation resolution for construction or operation. Recipients of Local Street Maintenance and Improvement funds shall adopt procedures that ensure that all agency departments consider and accommodate the needs of all users when projects or programs affecting public rights of way for which the agency is responsible. These procedures shall be consistent with and be designed to implement each agency’s general plan policies once that plan has been updated to comply with the Complete Streets Act of 2008. These procedures shall involve all agency departments whose projects will affect the public right of way and will incorporate opportunities for review by potential users of proposed projects. This review could be done through an advisory committee such as a Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee or as part of the review of the agency’s capital improvement program. As part of their biennial Growth Management Program checklist, agencies shall also list projects funded with Measure funds and detail how those projects accommodated all allowed users of the facilities. Commented [WRG19]: This entire section is currently under review and will be updated March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 63 As part of the multi-jurisdictional planning required by the Growth Management Program, agencies shall work with the Authority and the Regional Transportation Planning Committees to harmonize the planning, design, construction and operation of streets within their jurisdiction with the plans of adjoining and connecting jurisdictions. Exceptions Sponsors may forgo complete street accommodations when the public works director or equivalent agency official finds that: 1. Pedestrians, bicyclists, or other users are prohibited by law from using the transportation facility 2. The cost of new accommodation would be excessively disproportionate to the need or probable use 3. The sponsor demonstrates that, based on factors including current and future land use, current and projected user volumes, population density, and collision data, such accommodation is not needed Local complete streets procedures shall require that exceptions be made explicit as part of the approval of the project. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 64 Regional Advance Mitigation Program An estimated $xx million will be used to fund habitat-related environmental mitigation activities required in the implementation of the major highway, transit and regional arterial and local street and road improvements identified in the Transportation Expenditure Plan. Of this total, an estimated $xx million is related to mitigation requirements for local transportation projects and an estimated $xx million is related to mitigation requirements for the major highway and transit projects identified in the Transportation Expenditure Plan. The intent is to establish a program to provide for large-scale acquisition and management of critical habitat areas and to create a reliable approach for funding required mitigation for future transportation improvements thereby reducing future costs and accelerating project delivery. This approach would be implemented by obtaining coverage for transportation projects through existing and proposed multiple species conservation plans, including the East Contra Costa Habitat Conservation Plan. If this approach cannot be fully implemented, then these funds shall be used for environmental mitigation purposes on a project by project basis. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 65 Governing Structure Governing Body and Administration CCTA is governed by a Board composed of 11 members, all elected officials, with the following representation: • Two members from the Central County Regional Transportation Planning Commission (RTPC) also referred to as TRANSPAC • Two members from the East County RTPC, also referred to as TRANSPLAN • Two members from the Southwest County RTPC, also referred to as SWAT • Two members from the West County RTPC, also referred to as WCCTAC • One member from the Conference of Mayors • Two members from the Board of Supervisors The CCTA Board also includes three (3) ex-officio, non-voting members, appointed by the MTC, BART and the Public Transit Operators in Contra Costa County. Citizens Oversight Committee The Citizens Oversight Committee (Committee) shall provide diligent, independent and public oversight of all expenditures of Measure funds by CCTA or recipient agencies (County, cities and towns, transit operators, etc). The Committee will report to the public and focus its oversight on the: • Review of allocation and expenditure of Measure funds to ensure that all funds are used consistent with the Measure ballot measure. • Review of fiscal audits of Measure expenditures. • Review of performance audits of projects and programs relative to performance criteria established by the CCTA, and if performance of any project or program does not meet its established performance criteria, identify the reasons why and make recommendations for corrective actions that can be taken by the CCTA Board for changes to project or program guidelines. • Review of the maintenance of effort compliance requirements of local jurisdictions for local streets, roads and bridges funding. • Review of each jurisdiction’s Growth Management Checklist and compliance with the Growth Management Plan policies. The Committee shall prepare an annual report including an account of the Committee's activities during the previous year, its review and recommendations relative to fiscal or performance audits, and any recommendations made to the CCTA Board for implementing the expenditure plan. The report will be published in local newspapers and local media outlets throughout Contra Costa County, posted to the CCTA Website and continuously available for public inspection at CCTA offices. The report shall be composed of easy to understand language not in an overly technical format. The Committee shall make an annual presentation to the CCTA Board summarizing the annual report subsequent to its release. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 66 Committee members shall be selected to reflect community and business organizations and interests within the County. The CCTA Board will solicit statements of interest from the individuals representing the stakeholder groups listed below, and will appoint members to an initial Committee with the goal to provide a balance of viewpoints including but not limited to geography, age, gender, ethnicity and income status to represent the different perspectives of the residents of Contra Costa County. In establishing the initial Committee, the CCTA Board will solicit statements of interest from groups or individuals that represent professional expertise in civil or traffic engineering, accounting, municipal finance, and project management; and groups or individuals that represent taxpayer accountability, voter accountability, business development, labor, senior or paratransit services, non-motorized active transportation, transit advocacy and social justice. The Committee will include one member each appointed by the County Board of Supervisors and the councils of each of the incorporated cities and towns in Contra Costa County. Beginning two years after the appointment of the initial Committee and every two years thereafter, the CCTA Board will solicit statements of interest for new appointment or re- appointment of approximately one-third of the Committee membership and will appoint or re- appoint members in an attempt to maintain the diversity of the Committee. Any individual member can serve on the Committee for no more than 6 consecutive years. Committee members will be private citizens who are not elected officials at any level of local government, nor public employees from agencies that either oversee or benefit from the proceeds of the Measure. Membership is limited to individuals who live in Contra Costa County. Membership is restricted to individuals with no economic interest in any of CCTA’s projects or programs. If a member's status changes so that he/she no longer meet these requirements, or if a member resigns his/her position on the Committee, the CCTA Board will issue a new statement of interest from the same stakeholder category to fill the vacant position. The Committee shall meet up to once a month to carry out its responsibility, and shall meet at least once every 3 months. Meetings shall be held at the same location as the CCTA Board meetings are usually held, shall be open to the public and must be held in compliance with California's open meeting law (Brown Act). Meetings shall be recorded and the recordings shall be posted for the public. Members are expected to attend all meetings. If a member, without good reason acceptable to the Chair of the Committee, fails to attend either (a) two or more consecutive meetings or (b) more than 3 meetings a year, the CCTA Board will request a replacement from the stakeholder categories listed above. CCTA commits to support the oversight process through cooperation with the Committee by providing access to project and program information, audits, and other information available to the CCTA, and with logistical support so that the Committee may effectively perform its oversight function. The Committee will have full access to CCTA's independent auditors, and may request CCTA staff briefings for any information that is relevant to the Measure. The Committee Chair shall inform the CCTA Board Chair and Executive Director of any concern regarding CCTA staff’s commitment to open communication, the timely sharing of information, and teamwork. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 67 The Committee shall not have the authority to set policy or appropriate or withhold funds, nor shall it participate in or interfere with the selection process of any consultant or contractor hired to implement the expenditure plan. The Committee shall not receive monetary compensation except for the reimbursement of travel or other incidental expenses, in a manner consistent with other CCTA advisory committees In order to ensure that the oversight by the Committee continues to be as effective as possible, the efficacy of the Committee's Charter (ie this document) will be evaluated on a periodic basis and a formal review will be conducted by the CCTA Board, Executive Director and the Committee every five years to determine if any amendments to this Charter should be made. The formal review will include a benchmarking of the Committee's activities and charter with other best-in-class citizen oversight committees. Amendments to this Charter shall be proposed by the Committee and adopted or rejected by the CCTA Board. The Committee replaces CCTA's existing Citizens Advisory Committee. Advisory Committees The Authority will continue the committees that were established as part of the Transportation Partnership Commission organization as well as other committees that have been utilized by the CCTA to advise and assist in policy development and implementation. The committees include: • The Regional Planning Transportation Committees that were established to develop transportation plans on a geographic basis for sub-areas of the County, and • The Technical Coordinating Committee that will serve as the Authority's technical advisory committee. • The Paratransit Coordinating Council • The Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee • The Transit Committee March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 68 Implementing Guidelines Duration of the Plan 25 years, April 1, 2017 to March 31, 2042 Administration of the Plan 1. Funds only Projects and Programs in the Plan: Funds are only for purposes identified in the expenditure plan. 2. All Decisions Made in Public Process: The Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA) is given the fiduciary duty of administering the transportation sales tax proceeds in accordance with all applicable laws and with the Plan. Activities of the CCTA will be conducted in public according to state law, through publically noticed meetings. The annual budgets of CCTA, strategic plans and annual reports will all be prepared for public review. The interest of the public will be further protected by a Citizens Oversight Committee, described previously in the Plan. 3. Salary and Administration Cost Caps: Revenues may be expended by the Authority for salaries, wages, benefits, overhead and those services including contractual services necessary to administer the Measure; however, in no case shall the annual expenditures for the salaries and benefits of the staff necessary to perform administrative functions for the Authority exceed one percent (1%) of the annual revenues. The allocated costs of CCTA staff who directly implement specific projects or programs are not included in the administrative costs. 4. Expenditure Plan Amendments Require Majority Support: The Authority may review and propose amendments to the Expenditure Plan and the Growth Management Program to provide for the use of additional federal, state and local funds, to account for unexpected revenues, or to take into consideration unforeseen circumstances. Affected Regional Planning Transportation Committee(s) will participate in the development of the proposed amendment(s). All jurisdictions within the county will be given a 45 day period to comment on any proposed Expenditure Plan amendment. 5. Augment Transportation Funds: Funds generated pursuant to the Measure are to be used to supplement and not replace existing local revenues used for transportation purposes. Any funds already allocated, committed or otherwise included in the financial plan for any project on the Expenditure Plan shall be made available for project development and implementation as required in the project's financial and implementation program. Taxpayer Safeguards, Audits and Accountability 6. Citizens Oversight Committee: The Citizens Oversight Committee will provide diligent, independent and public oversight of all expenditures of Measure funds by CCTA or recipient agencies (County, cities and towns, transit operators, etc). The Committee will report to the public and focus its oversight on annual audits, the review and allocation of Measure funds, March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 69 the performance of projects and programs in the Plan, and compliance by local jurisdictions with the maintenance of effort and Growth Management Program described previously in the Plan 7. Fiscal Audits: All Funds expended by CCTA directly and all funds allocated by formula or discretionary grants to other entities are subject to fiscal audit. Recipients of Local Streets Maintenance & Improvements or transit (Non-Rail Transit Enhancements, Transportation for Seniors & People With Disabilities programs) funding (County, cities and towns and transit operators) will be audited at least once every five (5) years, conducted by an independent CPA. Any agency found to be in non-compliance shall have its formula sales tax funds withheld, until such time as the agency is found to be in compliance. 8. Performance Audits: Each year, the CCTA shall select and perform a focused performance audit on approximately one-fourth of the elements of the transportation expenditure plan. This process shall commence two years after passage of the new sales tax measure. The performance audits shall provide an accurate quantitative and qualitative evaluation of the programs or projects in question and specific recommendations for corrective action in the future. 9. Maintenance of Effort (MOE): The average of last three full fiscal years of expenditures of annual transportation funds on local streets, roads and bridges before the vote on new sales tax measure will be the basis of the MOE. The average dollar amount will then be increased once every three years by the construction cost index of that third year. Penalty for non- compliance of meeting the minimum MOE is immediate loss of all local formula money (Local Streets Maintenance and Improvement funds) until MOE compliance is achieved. The audit of the M.O.E. contribution shall be at least once every five years. Any agency found to be in non-compliance shall be subject to annual audit for three years after they come back into compliance. 10. Requirements for Fund Recipients: All recipients of funds allocated in this expenditure plan will be required to complete certain requirements including: reporting, implementing local hiring policy, tracking and reporting performance and accountability standards and requirements, and completing audits. 11. Geographic Equity: The proposed projects and programs to be funded through the expenditure plan constitute a “balanced” distribution of funding allocations to each subregion in Contra Costa County. However, through the course of the Measure, if any of the projects prove to be infeasible or cannot be implemented, the affected subregion may request that the Authority reassign funds to another project in the same subregion, as detailed in a CCTA Fund Allocations policy, and to maintain a “balanced” distribution of funding allocations to each subregion. Restrictions On Funds 12. No Expenditure Outside of Contra Costa County: Under no circumstance may the proceeds of this transportation sales tax be applied for any purpose other than for transportation improvements benefitting Contra Costa County. Under no circumstance may March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 70 these funds be appropriated by the State of California or any other local government agency. as defined in the implementing guidelines. 13. Environmental Review: All projects funded by sales tax proceeds are subject to laws and regulations of federal, state, and local government, including but not limited to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). 14. Performance based review: Before the allocation of any measure funds for the actual construction of capital projects with an estimated capital construction cost in excess of $25 million, the Authority will conduct a performance based review of project alternatives. 15. Complete Streets: All plan investments will conform to Complete Streets requirements, so that there are appropriate investments that fit the function and context of facilities that will be constructed, as further detailed in the Part ___ of the Plan. 16. Advance Mitigation Program: CCTA will develop a policy supporting the creation of an advance mitigation program to establish a program to provide for large-scale acquisition and management of critical habitat areas and to create a reliable approach for funding required mitigation for future transportation. This policy will identify projects that will benefit from the program and the financial contribution associated with those projects. This approach would be implemented by obtaining coverage for transportation projects through existing and proposed multiple species conservation plans, including the East Contra Costa Habitat Conservation Plan. The benefit of this policy will include an early comprehensive project delivery review, reduced costs attributed to mitigation, opportunity to significantly improve conservation benefits, and accelerated project delivery. If this approach cannot be fully implemented, then the identified funds shall be used for environmental mitigation purposes on a project by project basis. 17. Safe Transportation for Children: CCTA will allocate funds and will establish guidelines (in cooperation with project sponsors) to define priorities and maximize effectiveness. The guidelines may require provisions such as parent contributions; operational efficiencies; specific performance criteria and reporting requirements. 18. Compliance with the GMP/ULL Policy: If the Authority determines that a jurisdiction does not comply with the requirements of the Growth Management Program, the Authority shall withhold funds and also make a finding that the jurisdiction shall not be eligible to receive Local Streets Maintenance & Improvements or Community Development Incentive (CDI) Program funding until the Authority determines the jurisdiction has achieved compliance, as detailed in the GMP/ULL section of the Plan. 19. Local Contracting and Good Jobs: CCTA will develop a policy supporting the hiring of local contractors and businesses, apprenticeship programs for Contra Costa residents, and good jobs. 20. New Agencies: New cities or new entities (such as new transit agencies) that come into existence in Contra Costa County during the life of the Plan may be considered as eligible recipients of funds through a Plan amendment. Commented [WG20]: This provision is intended provide the residents of Contra Costa County with information as to how project alternatives rank with respect to GHG emissions, VMT and other factors (TBD). This requirement is intended as a disclosure process and not in any way to restrict the ability of the Authority to allocate measure funds to a project after completion of the required analysis. Commented [MT21]: Discussing with representatives of the labor community how to address topics such as: oApprentice Program(s) oLocal Hiring goals oVeteran and DBE Hiring Goals March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 71 Project Financing Guidelines and Managing Revenue 21. Fiduciary Duty: Funds may be accumulated for larger or longer term projects. Interest income generated will be used for the purposes outlined in the Plan and will be subject to audits. 22. Project and Program Financing: The CCTA has the authority to bond for the purposes of expediting the delivery of transportation projects and programs. CCTA will develop a policy to identify financing procedures for the entire plan of projects and programs. 23. Programming of Higher than Expected Revenue: Actual revenues may, at times be higher than expected in this Plan due to changes in receipts and additional funds may become available due to the increased opportunities for leveraging or project costs less than expected. Revenue may be lower than expected as the economy fluctuates. Determination of when the contingency funds become excess will be established by a policy defined by the CCTA. Funds considered excess will be prioritized first to expenditure plan projects and programs, and second to other projects of regional significance that are consistent with the expenditure plan. The new project or program will be required to be amended into the expenditure plan. 24. Fund Allocations: Through the course of the Measure, if any of the projects do not require all funds programmed for that project or have excess funding, or should a planned project become undeliverable, infeasible or unfundable due to circumstances unforeseen at the item the expenditure plan was created, funding for that project will be reallocated to another project or program. The subregion where the project or program is located may request that the CCTA reassign funds to another project in the same subregion. In the allocation of the released funds, the CCTA will in priority order consider: 1) a project or program of the same travel mode (i.e. transit, bicycle/pedestrian, or road) in the same subregion, 2) a project or program for another modes of travel in the same subregion, 3) other expenditure plan projects, and 4) other projects or programs of regional significance. The new project or program or funding level may be required to be amended into the expenditure plan. 25. Leveraging Funds: Leveraging or matching of outside funding sources is strongly encouraged. Any additional transportation sales tax revenues made available through their replacement by matching funds will be spent based on the principles outlined for fund allocations describe above. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 72 DEC 2015 JAN 2016 FEB 2016 MAR 2016 APR 2016 MAY 2016 JUN 2016 JULY 2016 AUG 2016 PATH TO TEP RECOMMENDATION CCTA BOARD MEETINGS/ SPECIAL MEETINGS EPAC MEETINGS RTPCs MEETINGS CITIES & COUNTY PUBLIC OUTREACH Polling Polling Review and Comment on Draft TEP Review and Comment on Draft TEP Review and Comment on Draft TEP EPAC develops TEP recommenda-tion RTPCs submit revised TEP recommenda-tions if desired Review and release Draft TEP Discuss TEP issues Discuss TEP issues DEVELOP DRAFT TEP REVIEW DRAFT TEP FINAL TEP Approve Final TEP for circulation to the Cities and Board of Supervisors Approve Final TEP, Adopt Ordinance, Request BOS to place on ballot BOS Approves Measure for Placement on the Ballot Cities/BOS Approval of TEP EPAC Subgroup Meetings RTPCs Subgroup Meetings March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 73   A  Community  Vision  for  a  New  Transportation  Sales  Tax   Prepared  by  a  growing  coalition  of  environmental,  labor,  transportation,  housing,  social  justice,  faith,   civic,  and  other  public  interest  groups  representing  Contra  Costa  voters.   [January  6,  2016]     The  Contra  Costa  Transportation  Authority  (CCTA)  is  expected  to  seek  voter  approval  for  a  new  ½   cent  transportation  sales  tax  in  2016.  If  approved,  this  measure  could  raise  more  than  $2  billion   dollars  over  30  years.  Experience  shows  that  a  plan  will  only  pass  if  it  is  developed  with  an   extensive  public  process  that  draws  the  nearly  full  and  unanimous  support  of  the  community.     A  revised  draft  Countywide  Transportation  Plan  and  revised  draft  Environmental  Impact  Report   have  yet  to  be  completed.  Decision-­‐makers,  residents,  and  organizations  need  to  see  these   documents  to  appropriately  plan  for  future  transportation  investments.  Without  this  planning,  the   process  to  achieve  consensus  on  a  variety  of  vision  and  policy  goals  will  be  considerably  more   difficult.       We  see  the  following  as  the  major  planning  issues  facing  Contra  Costa  County:   • Ever-­‐increasing  traffic,  the  direct  result  of  land  use  decisions  and  induced  demand.   • A  pressing  demand  for  new  homes  and  jobs  within  our  cities  and  towns  where  residents   and  employees  of  all  incomes  have  access  to  safe  and  convenient  transit,  walking,  and   biking  networks,  reducing  single-­‐occupant  driving  and  greenhouse  gas  emissions.   • The  need  to  dramatically  increase  funding  for  transit  and  enhance  the  existing  transit   system  for  peak  performance.     • Growing  threats  to  our  natural  and  agricultural  lands,  requiring  stronger  protections  and   investments.   • An  economic  imperative  to  create  quality  jobs  closer  to  home.       Much  has  changed  since  Contra  Costa  County  last  passed  a  transportation  measure.  When  past   funding  measures  were  approved  in  1998  and  2004,  Contra  Costa  County  did  not  face  state   mandated  reductions  in  greenhouse  gas  emissions  from  transportation.  The  intersection  between   land  use,  transportation,  conservation,  social  equity,  health,  and  economic  prosperity  was  less  well   understood.  Voters  today  expect  more  than  business  as  usual  or  incremental  change.  Any  funding   measure  must  be  transformational.  We  must  prioritize  plans  and  investments  that  change  the   current  dynamic  and  stay  accountable  to  the  public.         To  achieve  a  transformative  plan,  we  share  the  following  vision:       Vision  for  Contra  Costa  County:     Any  new  investments  in  Contra  Costa  County’s  transportation  system  should  be  transformational,   advancing  the  County’s  ongoing  transition  to  a  place  where  all  residents  have  a  variety  of   transportation  choices  to  meet  their  daily  needs.  New  funds  should  provide  an  alternative  to  traffic   congestion,  protect  the  climate,  and  improve  mobility  by  creating  a  more  balanced,  multimodal   system  that  supports  transit,  walking,  and  biking  as  primary  modes  of  transportation.  These   investments  should  promote  equitable,  sustainable  development  that  is  well  served  by  transit,   create  quality  local  jobs,  and  protect  the  agricultural  and  natural  lands  that  make  our  region  so   special.     March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 74   Incentivizing  Sustainable,  Equitable  Development:  Contra  Costa  should  incentivize   infill  development  for  people  of  all  incomes  near  transit  -­‐  with  a  priority  for  affordable  housing  -­‐  and  protect  existing  residents  from  displacement.  Affordable  housing  near  transit  is  widely  known   as  a  highly  effective  climate  protection  strategy,  promotes  increased  transit  ridership  and  should  be   additionally  incentivized  in  all  communities.  Sales  tax  revenue  and  related  grant  programs  that   provide  funding  for  cities  to  build  Transit  Oriented  Development  (TOD)  must  be  conditioned  on  a   demonstrated  track  record  of  building  affordable  housing,  having  locally  appropriate  anti-­‐ displacement  policies  in  place  and  planning  for  affordable  housing  within  the  specific  TOD   development.  All  transportation  investments  should  be  made  based  on  strong  performance   standards  to  achieve  livable,  walkable,  and  affordable  communities.  These  thriving  communities   will  also  attract  quality  jobs  located  closer  to  Contra  Costa  residents.   Local  and  Regional  Transit:  Contra  Costa  should  connect  people  with  a  transit  system  that  is  well   maintained,  achieves  15-­‐minute  headway  or  better,  closes  gaps  in  bus  service,  manages  mobility,   and  ensures  affordable,  accessible,  and  efficient  service  for  all  passengers.  Investments  should  be   made  to  increase  public  transit  ridership  and  provide  service  at  levels  that  working  people  and   their  families  can  rely  upon  for  daily  transportation  needs.       Growth  management:  Contra  Costa  should  lead  the  region  with  a  bold  growth  management   program  that  enhances  our  Urban  Limit  Lines  and  protects  and  invests  in  our  natural  and   agricultural  lands.  Policies  and  programs,  such  as  the  Growth  Management  Program,  must  be   treated  as  seriously  as  large  infrastructure  projects;  in  the  long  run  they  can  meet  our  collective   goals  far  more  cheaply.         Global  Warming  Solutions:  Contra  Costa  should  take  leadership  to  exceed  the  State  of  California’s   mandated  reductions  for  vehicle  miles  traveled  (VMT)  and  greenhouse  gas  emissions  (GHGs).  To  do   so,  it  should  prioritize  maintenance  of  the  existing  transportation  system,  including  BART;  create   healthy,  sustainable,  walkable  transit-­‐oriented  communities  for  all;  and  accelerate  the  transition  to   electric  vehicles.   Good  Local  Jobs:  The  jobs  that  infrastructure  projects  and  operations  investments  create  should   strengthen  the  local  economy  and  improve  the  living  standards  for  those  who  build,  maintain  and   operate  the  system  and  provide  opportunities  for  family-­‐supporting  jobs  and  career-­‐enhancing   skills  for  the  working  people  and  children  of  the  entire  county.       Complete  Streets:  Contra  Costa’s  roads  should  provide  choices  for  all  people,  ensuring  that  all   communities  have  complete  streets  that  reduce  congestion  by  giving  families  and  commuters  safe   and  attractive  options  for  all  modes  of  transportation.       Regional  Trail  Network:  Contra  Costa  should  expand  on  its  very  popular  walking  and  biking  trails   to  create  a  fully  connected,  regional  trail  system  that  integrates  transit  centers  and  downtowns,   neighborhoods,  and  the  county’s  great  open  space  network.     Accountability  and  Public  Benefits:  The  projects  funded  by  the  revenues  of  this  sales  tax  should   be  developed  with  the  input  of  the  communities  the  project  is  designed  to  serve,  contain  provisions   for  accountability  and  transparency  to  public  institutions,  including  recapture  provisions  if  public   goals  aren’t  being  met,  and  ensure  that  any  unexpected  additional  sales  tax  revenues  will  benefit   the  public  through  investment  in  voter-­‐approved  programs  funded  by  this  tax  measure.     March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 75   Endorsements  List:       Seth  Adams,  Save  Mount  Diablo           Bob  Allen,  Urban  Habitat       Rome  Aloise,  President  of  Teamsters  Joint  Council  7       John  Arantes,  Service  Employees  International  Union,  Local  1021     Judy  Barrientos,  President  Amalgamated  Transit  Union  1605     Cheryl  Brown,  AFSCME  Council  57           Gloria  Bruce,  East  Bay  Housing  Organizations       Dave  Campbell,  Bike  East  Bay             Joel  Devalcourt,  Greenbelt  Alliance       Sean  Dougan,  East  Bay  Regional  Park  District     Chris  Finn,  President  Amalgamated  Transit  Union  1555     Peter  Finn,  Secretary-­‐Treasurer  of  Teamsters  856       Amie  Fishman,  Non-­‐Profit  Housing  Association  of  Northern  California     Nati  Flores,  Monument  Impact               Peter  Lydon,  TRANSDEF       Richard  Marcantonio,  Public  Advocates             Steve  Older,  Area  Director  Machinists  Union     Joël  Ramos,  TransForm       Kristin  Tennessen,  Bike  Walnut  Creek             Debbie  Toth,  Rehabilitation  Services  of  Northern  California     Robbie  Ann  White,  President  AFSCME  2700     Yvonne  Williams,  President  Amalgamated  Transit  Union  192     Kenji  Yamada,  Bike  Concord         March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 76   Transformative  Policies  for  a  New  Transportation  Sales  Tax   [January  6,  2016]     Incentivizing  Sustainable  and  Equitable  Development:     1.  Establish  a  new  competitive  fund,  similar  to  the  OneBayArea  Grant  (OBAG)  Program  to   reward  jurisdictions  that  have  a  strong  track  record  of  affordable  housing  development  and  have   adopted  policies  that  encourage  sustainable,  equitable  development  with  safe  and  convenient   walkable  access  to  transit.  Funding  should  be  directed  to  locally-­‐nominated  Priority  Development   Areas  and  be  dedicated  to  transportation  projects  that  help  catalyze  sustainable,  equitable   development.  Distribute  funds  from  this  program  using  a  formula  similar  to  the  OBAG  county   funding  distribution  formula.     2.  All  jurisdictions  must  maintain  a  state-­‐approved  Housing  Element,  file  a  Housing  Element   Annual  Progress  Report  (APR)  with  the  California  Department  of  Housing  and  Community   Development  (HCD),  and  hold  an  annual  public  informational  hearing  at  the  time  of  filing  to  receive   transportation  funds.   3.  New  transit  projects  must  demonstrate  existing  or  planned  transit-­‐supportive  housing   densities  within  a  half-­‐mile  of  station  areas,  consistent  with  MTC’s  Resolution  3434  of  2005.1   4.  Establish  a  program  to  address  anti-­‐displacement  that  provides  funding  for  protections  of   existing  residents  and  new  affordable  housing  near  transit  stations.     5.  Allocate  Return  to  Source  funds  to  local  jurisdictions  using  the  same  distribution  formula   that  MTC  uses  to  allocate  OBAG  funds  to  counties—based  on  population,  past  housing   production,  and  future  housing  needs  (RHNA)  with  weighting  for  affordable  housing.  Give  priority   to  jurisdictions  with  particularly  strong  track  records  of  affordable  housing  production.     Local  and  Regional  Transit:     1.  Develop  and  fund  a  coordinated,  countywide,  accessible  transportation  and  smart   mobility  management  system  to  improve  efficiency  and  options  for  riders  of  all  abilities  with   the  goal  of  increasing  access  to  jobs,  medical  care,  services,  and  more.  Automobiles  and  fixed  route   services  have  enjoyed  substantial  investment,  attention,  funding  and  development  for  decades,  this   effort  would  start  to  bring  accessible  services  up  to  that  standard.     2.  Create  affordable  and  accessible  transit  options,  such  as  extending  West  County’s  student  bus   pass  program  throughout  Contra  Costa  County.     3.  Invest  in  fix-­‐it-­‐first  strategies  and  facilities  to  ensure  a  well-­‐maintained  and  fully  operational   regional  transit  system  that  expands  on  opportunities  for  high  quality  service  and  maintenance   jobs.                                                                                                                     1  http://www.mtc.ca.gov/planning/rtep/pdf/April_Commission_3434.pdf#page=14   March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 77   4.  Ensure  that  Contra  Costa  closes  gaps  in  bus  service  so  that  working  people  across  the  county   can  access  jobs,  housing,  and  services,  such  as  extending  bus  service  from  West  County  to  Martinez.       5.  Provide  funding  to  achieve  15-­‐minute  headway  frequencies  and  adequate  hours  of   operation  on  key  routes  and  within  PDAs.       6.  Invest  in  walkable  transit  connections—sidewalks,  paths,  and  other  pedestrian  facilities—to   close  gaps  in  the  pedestrian  infrastructure  and  make  it  easy  and  quick  to  access  transit.       Growth  Management:       1.  Enhance  our  Urban  Limit  Lines  (ULLs):  To  prevent  sprawl  development,  we  must  eliminate  the   loophole  in  Contra  Costa  County’s  Urban  Limit  Lines  that  allows  30-­‐acre  expansions  without  a   public  vote.  And  we  must  refine  our  existing  ULL  policies  by  defining  key  terms  such  as  “urban”  and   “rural,”  clarifying  which  services  must  comply  with  our  urban  limit  lines  (water,  sewer,  etc.),  and   preventing  subdivisions  outside  the  lines.       2.  Prohibit  sprawl-­‐inducing  projects:  These  include,  among  others,  the  James  Donlon  Extension,   Camino  Tassajara  Expansion,  and  Highway  239  alignments.  Projects  that  are  listed  as  poor   performers  in  MTC’s  Regional  Transportation  Plan  as  well  as  those  identified  by  CCTA’s   forthcoming  performance-­‐based  project  assessment  will  not  be  eligible  for  sales  tax  revenue  or   bond  funding.       3.  Ensure  agricultural  protections:  All  jurisdictions  with  agricultural  land  within  their  planning   area,  including  rangelands,  must  adopt  an  Agricultural  Protection  Ordinance,  which  mitigates  for   the  conversion  and  cumulative  impacts  on  those  lands,  to  receive  return  to  source  funding.   a) This  mitigation  can  overlap  with  other  mitigation  such  as  endangered  species  mitigation   but  must  be  at  least  1:1.   b) Funds  may  be  used  for  ongoing  management  of  mitigation  areas.     4.  Establish  new  Growth  Management  Program  standards:  To  reduce  vehicle  miles  traveled   (VMT),  greenhouse  gas  emissions  (GHG),  and  impacts  on  wildlife  habitats  and  agricultural  lands,   while  increasing  carbon  sequestration,  all  jurisdictions  must  have  the  following  policies  in  place  to   receive  return  to  source  funding:   a) Hillside  development  ordinance   b) Ridgeline  protection  ordinance   c) Open  space  system  with  major  ridgelines  defined   d) Protection  of  wildlife  corridors     e) Plan  to  conserve  buffers  around  open  space  and  agriculture     f) Prohibitions  on  culverting  blueline  creeks  for  anything  more  than  road  crossings  in  the   shortest  length  possible   g) No  development  of  major  subdivisions,  urban  development,  or  urban  services  allowed  in   non-­‐urban  Priority  Conservation  Areas       Global  Warming  Solutions:       1.  The  TEP  shall  meet  or  exceed  the  following  two  greenhouse  gas  (GHG)  emissions  targets:   a) By  2020,  a  reduction  in  GHG  emissions  per  capita  of  7%   March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 78   b) By  2035,  a  reduction  in  GHG  emissions  per  capita  of  15%.2     2.  Reduce  GHGs  by  supporting  Priority  Development  Areas  (PDAs)  with  enhanced  transit:   Incentivize  housing  at  all  income  levels  within  the  PDAs  and  provide  high  levels  of  transit  service  to   make  sustainable  transportation  choices  available  for  residents  across  the  income  spectrum.   Augment  these  investments  by  fostering  the  diffusion  of  electric,  rather  than  fossil  fuel,  vehicles.     3.  Mitigation  of  GHG  pollution:  The  TEP  will  prioritize  projects  and  programs  that  reduce  VMT   and  GHGs.  If  transportation  projects  or  programs  increase  greenhouse  gas  emissions,  they  must   fully  mitigate  those  emissions  by  protecting  carbon-­‐sequestering  natural  or  agricultural  lands.   Mitigation  strategies  must  also  address  localized  air  pollution  impacts,  particularly  for  low-­‐income   communities  and  other  vulnerable  populations,  including  children  and  seniors.     Environmental  Mitigation:       1.  The  TEP  shall  dedicate  a  significant  amount  of  funding  to  an  Advanced  Mitigation  Program   to  enhance  the  effectiveness  of  transportation-­‐related  environmental  mitigation  activities.  This   program  will  bundle  and  strategically  deploy  mitigation  funds  to  proactively  conserve  important   natural  and  agricultural  lands  and  leverage  other  conservation  investments.     a) Funds  may  be  used  for  ongoing  management  of  mitigation  areas.   b) Funding  levels  shall  be  based  on  the  maximum  number  of  qualifying  TEP  projects  for   environmental  mitigation.   Good  Local  Jobs:     1.  Projects  and  programs  funded  by  the  TEP  must  meet  wage  and  benefit  standards  that   ensure  local  family-­‐supporting  jobs.  Major  transportation  projects  must  include  Project  Labor   Agreements.       2.  Create  and  monitor  employment  performance  criteria,  including  the  following:     a) Local  hire  programs   b) Apprenticeship  programs  approved  by  state     c) Helmets  to  Hardhats  Veteran  hiring  programs   d) Annual  monitoring:     i. Demographic  information  such  as  race  and  ethnicity,  gender,  age,  disability  status,   income  range,  zip  code  or  census  tract,  resident  of  an  area  of  concentrated  poverty,   veteran  status,  criminal  justice  history   ii. Number  of  positions  (direct,  indirect)   iii. Job  type  (full-­‐time,  part-­‐time,  permanent,  short-­‐term,  contract  or  civil  service,  newly   created  or  continuation  of  existing  jobs)   iv. Training  opportunities  and  occupational  ladder     Complete  Streets:       1.  Create  a  distinct  Complete  Streets  Program  category:                                                                                                                   2  http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/sb375/final_targets.pdf;  http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/sb375/sb375.htm   March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 79   The  goal  of  this  program  is  to  make  major  streets  efficient  and  safe  for  all  anticipated  users,  and   thereby  maximize  investments  to  move  more  people  along  currently  congested  streets  and  in  the   process  give  commuters  more  transportation  choices.     a) This  program  is  separate  from  the  trails  category  that  functions  to  fill  gaps  in  the  bikeway   network.  It  is  also  separate  from  other  transit  operations  and  local  streets  and  roads   repaving  funding.   b) The  program  will  fund,  among  other  things,  projects  to  restripe  roadways  for  all  users  and   major  repaving  projects  that  create  multi-­‐modal  transportation  infrastructure.       2.  Eligible  Complete  Streets  Program  projects  include:   a) Road  diets  for  improved  safety  and  increased  access  for  all  users   b) New  protected  bikeways  on  major  streets   c) Pedestrian  and  children  safety  improvements   d) Transit  operation  improvements  and  associated  facility  improvements     e) Smart  parking  management   f) ADA  access  and  projects  to  relieve  paratransit  demands   g) As  part  of  the  above,  truck  loading,  signal  upgrades  and  repaving   h) Any  other  project  designed  to  give  commuters  attractive  options  to  leave  their  car  at   home  and  find  a  better  way   i) Ongoing  maintenance  of  Complete  Streets  projects     Regional  Trail  Network:     1.            Dedicate  funding  for  the  regional  trail  network,  including  paved  trail  gap  closure  projects,   countywide  crossing-­‐safety  improvements,  grade-­‐separated  crossings,  and  maintenance  funds  for   existing  and  future  paved  trail  facilities.   2.            The  highest  priority  trails  for  funding  are:   a) San  Francisco  Bay  Trail   b) Iron  Horse  Trail   c) Contra  Costa  Canal  Trail   d) Delta  De  Anza  Trail   e) Marsh  Creek  Trail,  including  the  newly  proposed  section  between  Round  Valley  Regional   Preserve  and  Clayton   f) Great  California  Delta  Trail   g) Mokelumne  Coast  to  Crest  Trail   h) Richmond  Greenway     3.            Conforming  to  current  Measure  J  requirements,  dedicate  one-­‐third  of  regional  trail   funding  to  the  East  Bay  Regional  Park  District.  Allocate  the  remaining  two-­‐thirds  competitively   among  the  four  sub-­‐regions.   Accountability  and  Public  Benefits:     1.  Ensure  that  all  funds  are  delivered  in  a  timely  fashion  as  approved  by  voters  to  benefit   Contra  Costa  County.       2.  Provide  annual  reviews  of  all  project  and  program  performance  to  ensure  that  voters  know   how  and  where  their  tax  dollars  are  being  spent.     March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 80     3.  An  Independent  Advisory  Committee  should  review  all  CCTA  tax  measures  and  provide   periodic  progress  reports  to  the  public.  The  advisory  committee  should  include  a  range  of  non-­‐ profit  organizations  and  other  stakeholders.       4.  Ensure  contract  accountability  with  the  following:   a) Increased  citizen  input  in  the  subsidy  award  process   b) Inclusion  of  job,  environmental,  and  social  equity  standards   c) Clawback  or  recapture  provisions  if  commitments  not  met       March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 81 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/172103 Gas Tax (Sales Tax Portion)$11,131,261 $8,329,355 $3,727,034 $1,885,048Total Gas Tax$27,262,483 $24,961,630 $20,238,896 $18,926,8882104‐2106 (Excise Tax Portion)$16,131,222 $16,632,275 $16,511,862 $17,041,840 $‐ $5,000,000 $10,000,000 $15,000,000 $20,000,000 $25,000,000 $30,000,000Gas Tax FundingFiscal YearCollapse of Contra Costa's Gas Tax 2013/14 ‐2016/172103 Gas Tax (Sales Tax Portion)Total Gas Tax2104‐2106 (Excise Tax Portion)March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes82 February 17, 2016 Authority Special TEP Meeting Handout provided by presenter Elaine Welch - Agenda Item 1.4 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 83 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 84 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 85 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 86 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 87 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 88 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 89 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 90 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 91 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 92 PMA ALTERNATIVE for SALES TAX MEASURE 2-11-16 • 23°/o for a Return-to-Source Component with the same allocation formula and essentially the same checklist that applies to Measure J. • 6°/o for a Transportation Incentives Component that funds transportation projects and programs that encourage jobs, housing, and economic development. Participation by jurisdictions is elective and grant applications are competitively awarded at the subregional (RTPC) level. PMA will participate in development of language and details regarding process and criteria for awarding funding. • 9o/o for a Maior Streets Component that pays for improvements on major roads, encourages complete streets programs, and funds other technologies and innovations that improve transportation on busy corridors. PMA will participate in development of language and details regarding process and criteria for awarding funding. • No addition to the current Transportation for Livable Communities program. • Eliminate the provisions that allow up to 30-acre adjustments to the ULL without a vote. * * * Under this plan, 3 8% ol the funds will go back to the jurisdictions. February 17, 2016 Authority Special TEP Meeting Handout Agenda Item 1.2 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 93 NEW MEASURE TRANSPORTATION EXPENDITURE PLAN (DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION ONLY) February 24, 2016 Distribution of Funding By Subregion Requests Submitted by RTPCs in July/August 2015 No. Funding Category $ millions %Central Southwest West East Central Southwest West East SUM (a)(b) (c)(d)(a)(b) (c)(d) 1 Local Streets Maintenance and Improvements 540.0 23.1%156 120 119 145 206.1 134 or 112 152.3 198.2 668.6 or 690.6 2 Major Streets and Complete Streets Project Grants 200.0 8.6%108.3 29.3 19.4 42.9 151.5 41 27.2 60 279.7 3 BART Capacity, Access and Parking Improvements 300.0 12.8%88.1 57.4 69.8 84.7 10 28 or 50 43.5 20 101.5 or 123.5 4 East Contra Costa Transit Extension 70.0 3.0%70 80 80 5 Transit & Interchange Improvements along the I-80 Corridor in West County 110.0 4.7%110 114.2 114.2 6 Improve traffic flow & implement high capacity transit in the I-680 corridor & SR 24 4 140.0 6.0%40 100 39 100 139 7 Improve traffic flow along the SR 242 & SR 4 Corridors in Central and Eastern County 70.0 3.0%40 30 47.7 30 77.7 8 Interstate 680 and State Route 4 Interchange Improvements 60.0 2.6%60 60 60 9 East County Corridor 117.0 5.0%117 120 120 10 Advance Mitigation Program 3 TBD TBD 0 11 Non-Rail Transit Enhancements 200.0 8.6%50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 57.9 60 54.4 46.9 219.2 12 Transportation for Seniors and People with Disabilities 50.0 2.1%10.1 4.7 12.9 22.2 21.3 10 27.2 46.9 105.4 13 Safe Transportation for Children 50.0 2.1%7.0 16.3 21.3 5.4 10.8 25.0 32.6 8.3 76.7 14 Intercity Rail and Ferry Service 50.0 2.1%8 35 7 8 38.1 6.6 52.7 15 Pedestrian, Bicycle and Trail Facilities 60.0 2.6%12.4 24.7 16.8 6.1 20 40 27.2 9.9 97.1 16 Community Development Investment Grant Program1 140.0 6.0%41.1 26.8 32.6 39.5 24.7 16.5 41.2 17 Innovative Transportation Technology / Connected Communities Grant Program2 65.0 2.8%21.8 5.5 26.7 11.0 20 5 24.5 10.1 59.6 18 Transportation Planning, Facilities & Services 23.4 1.0%6.9 4.5 5.4 6.6 0 19 Regional Choice 70.3 3.0%30.2 3.7 19.7 16.7 0 20 Administration 23.4 1.0%6.9 4.5 5.4 6.6 0 Commute Alternatives 0.0 0.0%10 5 2.8 6.6 24.4 TOTAL 2339.1 68.4%686.9 447.4 544.0 660.8 687.0 448.0 544.0 660.0 2339 Population Based Share 2339.1 686.9 447.4 544.0 660.8 Population Share (2030 Estimate) of Total 29.37%19.13%23.26%28.25% Notes:Amounts shown are reflected in DRAFT TEP Version 1.1 1 RTPCs requests under TLC program are shown here Preliminary Draft TEP Issued on February 22, 2016 showed $90M in error. Proposed amount is $140M as shown. 2 RTPCs requests for clean transportation, technology upgrades, subregional needs and anti-displacement are shown here Preliminary Draft TEP Issued on February 22, 2016 showed $120.3M in error. Proposed amount is $70.3M as shown. 3 Projects that would be included in an Advance Mitigation Program will be identified/called-out 4 SR 24 was left out of the description in the draft TEP issued on February 22, 2016. Category No. 1 was distributed based on population and road miles formula Categories 2, 12, 13, 15 & 17 split proportional to RTPCs requests Categories 3, 16, 18 & 20 distributed based on population share Category No. 11 split equally between subregions March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 94 SAN FRANCISCO SAN JOSE SANTA ROSA WALNUT CREEK February 2, 2016 Ross Chittenden, Deputy Executive Director Contra Costa Transportation Authority 2999 Oak Rd, Suite 100 Walnut Creek, CA 94597 Dear Mr. Chittenden: GREENBELT ALLIANCE Walnut Creek Office 1601 N. Main St., Suite 105 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 (925) 932-7776 RE: Request for Information on Growth Management Policy Recommendations Greenbelt Alliance appreciates the opportunity to provide further information and rationale behind the growth management policy recommendations contained in the "Community Vision and Transformative Policies for a New Transportation Sales Tax." The level of receptivity from Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA) commissioners, staff, and consultants is encouraging as we participate in the development of a new transportation sales tax measure. In addition to the following recommendations and maps, please review Greenbelt Alliance's recent white paper, "Shaping our Growth: How Urban Growth Boundaries strengthen communities and protect greenbelts" (Attachment A). These documents demonstrate the critical importance of smart and managed growth at both the local and regional level to protect our environment, strengthen our economy, and advance social equity. Greenbelt Alliance also reaffirms our recognition that CCTA is building on significant leadership managing growth and encouraging infill development over the last 30 years. Yet despite this important progress, significant problems exist in our current transportation and land use systems, and many of these problems will worsen if immediate remedies are not implemented. Greenbelt Alliance hopes that collectively we can harness our previous success to address the challenges of the next 30 years. While this letter focuses on recommendations to enhance the Growth Management Program (GMP), Greenbelt Alliance looks forward to providing more information on how to incentivize infill development in the near future. 312 Sutter Street, Suite~ 510 San Francisco, CA 94108 greenbelt.org February 3, 2016 Authority Special TEP Meeting Handout Agenda Item 1.1 Attachment C March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 95 SAN FRANCISCO SAN JOSE SANTA ROSA WALNUT CREEK GREENBELT ALLIANCE Background Smart Growth, conservation, and transportation are inextricably linked in Contra Costa. With the passage of Measure C-1988, Contra Costa became the first county in the state to plan and invest in the transportation, land use, and growth management connection-now central to planning efforts at all levels of government in California. The success of the GMP was a key component to voter approval of the County Urban Limit Line (ULL) in 1990. With the success of Measure J in 2004, voters enhanced the ULLand created the Transportation for Livable Communities (TLC) program, which directed transportation investments to encourage development near transit and downtown centers. These and other measures have made achieving initial greenhouse gas reduction goals much easier for Contra Costa, as CCTA has acknowledged. It's an ongoing process however, and the reduction goals will continue to tighten. Our efforts must continue to evolve in order to continue making progress. Both Measure C-1988 and Measure J-2004 were built with strong participation from a coalition of stakeholders to advance good public policy that voters continue to strongly favor. A new transportation sales tax would provide an opportunity to build upon our success to enhance these popular programs. The following four policy recommendations will provide the growth management enhancements that voters demand and deserve: Recommendation 1: Enhance our Urban Limit Lines (ULLs): To prevent sprawl development, we must eliminate the loophole in Contra Costa County's Urban Limit Lines that allows 30-acre expansions without a public vote. And we must refine our existing ULL policies by defining key terms such as "urban" and "rural," in alignment with regional and state standards, clarifying which services must comply with our urban limit lines (water, sewer, etc.), and preventing major subdivisions outside the Jines. Measure J-2004 made significant progress to reign in decades of poorly managed growth. All of Contra Costa's jurisdictions either adopted the County's ULL or their own voter-approved ULL (Pittsburg, Antioch, and San Ramon). Voters have defended the ULLs on each occasion that they have been challenged by expansion proposals (see Appendix A). While the voters have to-date been able to defend the ULLs, there is, however, a glaring and dangerous loophole to allow 30-acre expansions without a vote of the people. Contra Costa should immediately remove this loophole and ensure that any ULL adjustments are approved by a vote of the people-just like in Alameda County. The ULL is the central element of voter participation in growth management in Contra Costa County; we should be willing to trust the voters' judgment about future 30-acre adjustments. Page 2 of 11 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 96 SAN FRANCISCO SAN JOSE SANTA ROSA WALNUT CREEK GREENBELT ALLIANCE This 30-acre loophole has to potential, once used, to pave the way for innumerable ULL expansions throughout Contra Costa County. As shown in Appendix B, 30-acre expansions could be applied broadly to the urbari edge-chipping away at voter protections one proposal at a time. In total, more than 9,3 0 0 acres of land across Contra Costa County are at risk of development through 30-acre ULL expansions. Each of these threats, even in isolation, encourages speculation of our natural and agricultural land-putting some of the best farmland out of production, driving up land costs, and destabilizing the agricultural heritage and economy of Contra Costa County. As a whole, this would be a disaster for our county and would jeopardize future efforts to manage growth. Recent sprawl developments, particularly in the Tassajara Valley, have tested the ULL loopholes. The "New Farm" sprawl development project was able to advance because of the lack of clarity and definition of "urban" and "rural." This allowed for an egregious proposal that would have undermined the ULL broadly. Fortunately the proposal was withdrawn in 2013, but the lack of clarity remains a pressing issue. The current proposal for the "Tassajara Parks" development would use the 30-acre loophole for the first time to facilitate residential development outside of the ULL. The potential for an avalanche of 30-acre expansions throughout Contra Costa County is looming. In addition, we must prevent major subdivisions of land-the division of large parcels into five or more smaller parcels-outside the ULL. The purpose of such subdivisions is to facilitate urban development. This is inconsistent with the intent of the ULL and would foster land speculation and development pressure. Voters in Contra Costa-who have repeatedly defeated challenges to the ULL-will want to know that promises to prevent sprawl are kept in any new transportation funding measure, and that loopholes will be closed before it is too late . Recommendation 2: Prohibit sprawl-inducing projects: These include, among others, the james Donlon Extension, Camino Tassajara Expansion, and Highway 239 alignments. Projects that are listed as poor performers in MTC's Regional Transportation Plan as well as those identified by CCTA 's forthcoming performance-based project assessment will not be eligible for sales tax revenue or bond funding. Contra Costa voters are fed up with congestion. And congestion is getting worse by the day as the economy improves. New transportation investments should not burden residents with additional congestion. Yet poorly planned transportation projects do just that, by encouraging new sprawl development that adds thousands of new drive-alone commuters onto our existing overcrowded streets, roads, and highways. Page 3 of 11 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 97 SAN FRANCISCO SAN JOSE SANTA ROSA WALNUT CREEK GREENBELT ALLIANCE Unfortunately, the CCTA is currently contemplating funding some of the worst sprawl-inducing projects in the Bay Area, which could have substantial impacts on future congestion. Contra Costa deserves better investments that will reduce congestion, provide competitive opportunities to access transit, and protect our farms and natural lands from further sprawl. The Community Vision recommends prohibiting all sprawl-inducing transportation projects, including the following three projects, all of which would have disastrous effects on Contra Costa's transportation system and quality of life: • Widening Camino Tassajara outside of the ULL would significantly increase the pressure and capacity for new sprawl development, in the rural Tassajara Valley. Contra Costa County residents have repeatedly voted to protect this flashpoint area from sprawl development and their desire to see the area remain rural should be respected. The James Donlon Boulevard Extension's environmental consequences are so egregious that MTC's Regional Transportation Plan lists it as one of the worst-performing proposals in the entire Bay Area and denied State and Federal funding for the project. Finally, the proposal to create a new major highway expansion through East County, SR 239, could lead to significant and irreversible impacts on natural and agricultural lands. Funding SR 239 would also signal a major deviation from SB 375 and recent direction from CalTrans to discourage new major highway expansions. With many details of the project still undefined, the project can be assumed to induce sprawl in the Contra Gosta Agricultural Core, significantly impact prime farmland and sensitive habitat, and increase congestion in the 1-580 corridor, thereby creating regional commuter tensions between Contra Costa and Alameda counties. While we recognize the importance of goods movement and the need for economic development opportunities in East Contra Costa County-the environmental impacts from this project must be analyzed to allow voters to make informed decisions about the consequences of a major highway expansion. Appendix C maps these three projects in relation to the ULLand current infill housing opportunity sites. As it clearly demonstrates, these particular projects threaten to undermine growth management protections and redirect transportation investments away from areas where infrastructure and infill housing opportunities already exist. In additional to specific prohibition on these sprawl-inducing projects, Greenbelt Alliance also recommends that CCT A adopt a Countywide Transportation Plan (CTP) and accompanying environmental review documents before finalizing the Transportation Expenditure Plan (TEP). The CTP should include a performance-based project assessment to determine appropriate projects and prioritize investments that best meet the goals and vision of Contra Costa voters, as well as meet the requirements of Page 4 of 11 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 98 SAN FRANCISCO SAN JOSE SANTA ROSA WALNUT CREEK GREENBELT ALLIANCE local, county, regional, and state policy. Using a performance-based model wiH help to identify and eliminate other sprawl-inducing road projects. Additionally, any proposals for new major highway expansion must include design parameters that eliminate the possibility of sprawl inducement and provide protections and mitigations for impacts on natural and agricultural lands. Recommendation 3: Ensure agricultural protections: All jurisdictions with agricultural land within their planning area, including rangelands, must adopt an Agricultural Protection Ordinance, which mitigates for the conversion and cumulative impacts on those lands, to receive return to source funding. Contra Costa County's farms and ranches are some of the Bay Area and California's most fruitful, contributing $225 million annually.1 The county is rich with an abundance of Brentwood sweet corn, U-Pick cherries, and a diverse array of crops available locally and nationally. Distressingly, Contra Costa County has lost almost 40% of its prime farmland to sprawl since 1990. As the Bay Area housing market soars, much of what remains is still threatened by development pressure- particularly within Special Planning Areas as identified in Brentwood's General Plan. In fact, Contra Costa County has the most open space land at risk of development in the entire region: over 18,000 acres or the equivalent of 18 Golden Gate Parks. Despite the protection provided by voter-approved urban limit lines (ULLs) and the Ag Core, the county's agricultural and open space lands are at the frontline of development pressure. It is critical that Contra Costa step up agricultural protection and mitigation policies to ensure that we continue Contra Costa's strong agricultural heritage and prevent further loss of farms and ranches. The City of Brentwood is currently the only jurisdiction in Contra Costa County that has an agricultural mitigation policy, but this only applies within city limits. To ensure adequate mitigation throughout the county, all jurisdictions with agricultural lands (both crop and ranching lands), including the County, should be required to adopt mitigation policies to receive return to source funding. Recommendation 4: Establish new Growth Management Program standards: To reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT), greenhouse gas emissions (GHG), and impacts on wildlife habitats and agricultural lands, while increasing 1 http :/ jwww.co.eontra-costa.ea.us/DocumentCenter /View /3 95 56 Page 5 of ll March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 99 SAN FRANCISCO SAN JOSE SANTA ROSA WALNUT CREEK GREENBELT ALLIANCE carbon sequestration, all jurisdictions must have the following policies in place to receive return to source funding: • • • • • Hillside development ordinance Ridgeline protection ordinance Open space system with major ridgelines defined Protection of wildlife corridors Plan to conserve buffers around open space and agriculture Prohibitions on culverting blueline creeks for anything more than road crossings in the shortest length possible Prohibition of development of major subdivisions, urban development, or urban services allowed in non-urban Priority Conservation Areas Contra Costa is fortunate to have such majestic landscapes and diversity of natural resources. To ensure that those resources continue to serve future generations, there is a critical need to institute basic growth management policies across the county. This has the added benefit of leveling the playing field between jurisdictions and creating greater policy parity and uniformity to help resolve longstanding land use conflicts. Appendix D shows where Planning Area and Sphere of Influence boundaries extend beyond the ULL, demonstrating intentions for future expansions, often in conflict with neighboring jurisdictions. These inter-jurisdictional conflicts extend throughout the county. Within the last few years, development proposals on the hills between Concord and Pittsburg escalated tensions around the future of urban development and the proposed Regional Park at the Concord Naval Weapons Station. In East County, Brentwood and Antioch have attempted to annex the same hillsides and open space in an apparent race for sprawl development outside of the ULL. These land use tensions would be eased, if not resolved, with clear and consistent policies adopted by the various jurisdictions. Preventing localized land use conflicts will also ensure greater consensus and targeting of limited transportation funds. Ultimately, it is in each jurisdiction's interest to maintain natural amenities that increase economic prosperity and quality of life. The aforementioned growth management standards would provide the needed framework for smart planning uniformity throughout the county. Naturally, jurisdictions without these natural resources would not be required to adopt further requirements. Furthermore, jurisdictions that have already adopted such policies would not need to adopt further requirements. Page 6 of 11 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 100 SAN FRANCISCO SAN JOSE SANTA ROSA WALNUT CREEK GREENBELT ALLIANCE Conclusion Greenbelt Alliance strongly recommends enhancing the Growth Management Program and Urban Limit Line as central policies in a new transportation sales tax. In particular, Greenbelt Alliance recommends removing the 30-acre ULL expansion loophole, prohibiting sprawl-inducing projects, protecting agricultural lands, and establishing greater uniformity in smart land use planning practices. These enhancements will create better protections for the natural and agricultural lands that voters cherish, encourage the right kind of development in the right places, and prevent the worsening of congestion. Greenbelt Alliance appreciates the opportunity to share our recommendations and rationale with the CCT A Commissioners and we are looking forward to presenting this information and answering further questions at the February 3, 2016 Transportation Expenditure Plan Special Session. Sincerely, Joel Devalcourt Regional Representative, East Bay Greenbelt Alliance Page 7 of 11 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 101 SAN FRANCISCO SAN JOSE SANTA ROSA WALNUT CREEK GREENBELT ALLIANCE Appendix A Expansion Proposals to Contra Costa County's Urban Limit Line Expansion Proposals to the Urban Limit Line from 2005 · 2014 Planning Boundaries p :-;1 City D Contra Costa County D City-Adopted l:.l." ~Limits Urban Limit Line Urban Growth Boundary (.-:o~>lroJ C<:":.".u ( ·~L;::I~ ··~·.·,r•-:;,c:: t\1H'O~:;fl~ k:lt:ri!'lltt~r. (;f:="lF 1(\!~~ ;lf:r;'.! ."\!~(.() Ml'l!~!: San Ramon M•••ure W 2010 Other Lands • Developed Land • Protected Lands (.A ;:t:.r:,ll.tr:r,l f..4~DI~I::c; .;,~.a ('~ Pl":}!~":te-;J 1\r.~id ol:o.o:<. f.1::r;<t ~!!!i~ f'lo}!):l..!ll~ ;:(!\) !\.:,,!1\~ltil; (;•)l~!:-!'J':oll:<'!'l (.:.):;.-!'!"i·~;~t D~tM~ '!t' }.(: 1'; n Page 8 of 11 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 102 SAN FRANCISCO SAN JOSE SANTA ROSA WALNUT CREEK Appendix B Par~els Outside of Cont~a Costa County's Urban Limit Line At Risk of Development Parcels Adjacent to the • ULL Susceptible to Development from 30-acre ULL Expansions Total Land At Risk Is 9,346 Acres Planning Boundaries t ;:;;!j City ::::; Limits D Contra Costa County Urban Limit Line ~7-!::ht. Cv'l.lt i.~1a;·w.: Mllppiil;J l!:,•)tf;".h!OO:H C.~!lt~; :.t()lf, Other Lands Developed Protected Land Lands Cl\ Fflfmt.wti f..l.up~•h•1 '~I!:! (J\ FH'~';{ it•.i ;~,,·,~:: .n~~ :\1c,:l!t,,~!.--:") ~'•!:'<]'"'~"'' :·.:l1:~ N.ll;"'!l(.i Cl":h,!":*i.1'1'!~ Er!:<!-:!",-!'i~! rJiJt,u P.~: ~:('l~· GREENBELT ALLIANCE Page 9 of 11 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 103 SAN FRANCISCO SAN JOSE SANTA ROSA WALNUT CREEK Appendix C Prioritizing Transportation Investments to Support lnfill Opportunities Housing Element Opportunity lnflll Sites 2014.2022 • Developed Land (lnflll Sites) "'=o1:-:.c.!Jiil<,r: '.·f?..r~ A•~J ::O;,v.!JnJr.,~nt,; O:t.!l! ~HNA ~ ~;t-_r..:'Ht. .o:'.N!r:~,:- Sprawl-Inducing Transportation and Development Projects Planning Boundaries City D Contra Costa Limits County Urban Limit Line ~ •• t:lif: ;,::~,.,,_ -.~;..:"'''!'.' !.tl~!'i':''ti l;lf:~!•,~J:!';;:! ·:>r~Hi ";t~;C D CJty•Adopt,.d • Contra Coste County Urban Growth Agricultural Core Boundary Gi\:ftld:.:l: (.oiiJ\;~1? !L:jC(J!..;h "''\ t:::(!I'IIV!: }I~: I ()tUr:"!: G~Hlfllll !)\arl Mu~,r, '-Camino Ta .. ajara Other Land • Developed Land O::.A ~~:em!•L!.J M:•p~:!•U :!!'11 M~r-~t:n"a ~r-.~v~tm ·;~~li'; GREENBELT ALLIANCE ~ AU t•"H I •IH,O ... Cl Existing and Planned Public Transit .,._ BART and Amtrak ~.~ :•.r >:Y.•t.:•;U ';";;:~,.;j;:• i.:.il'Ni ! •I :\1:\ \.:~C,,11 ;~lllo, ~ Dt:l~~'·''.!' Page 10 of 11 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 104 SAN FRANCISCO SAN JOSE SANTA ROSA WALNUT CREEK GREENBELT ALLIANCE Appendix D Planning Boundaries in Contra Costa County UnDeveloped and UnProtected Land within Planning Boundarle• Extending Past the County's Urban Limit Line [/ !] City Limits \:vmm•:voto;': );..::!\~ t.1:!pp:,~ 1::\{•:!:-.=•;;.,;,n c:, :.;~ ~ ).{;t'} D City-Adopted Urban Growth Bound ary •11 .:O!I.!r,.~ ... r.. '.,_, •1 •J ,.. t.t:~"'!M':. D Contra Costa County Urban limit Line tkifl D+;nJk=~-t:1:Urt-~;~ !r~n~i \i.;l!'d frmu "'..A F·•m,inf;.;l MCJ!.:.:pilli! ,., ~ h-r.n.:t'll!f!W P~mm 2012. P"r.;ttX'k~ lrn<t ~~cd !;o:r, CA ?'tT"I'l~:•<"fl J\r~-·•~ llild NllliC.I'I,)! C~.:n!ltrr-;.,;i(,t~ i:;olSI!':rt~nt [JilfJJWt 1.01~) • Sphere of Influence II Pl anning Area r.:,, •• ,.,,l:•tl! .r.n"'i{l! !e ;•!.v.::~ vn r,:,,;, 1' f.;.::n~t u: t'!em; Page 11 of 11 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 105 SAN FRANCISCO SAN JOSE SANTA ROSA WALNUT CREEK Shaping our Growth: Greenbelt Alliance Attachment A GREENBELT ALLIANCE San Francisco Office 312 Sutter Street, Suite 510 San Francisco, CA 94108 (415) 543-6771 How Urban Growth Boundaries strengthen communities and protect greenbelts By 2040, the Bay Area will grow from 7 million to 9.3 million people. We must decide how to best make room for everyone to live, work, and play in our cities, towns and neighborhoods. What is a UGB? An urban growth boundary (UGB) is a planning tool for cities and towns that identifies the extent of where we locate our homes, schools, and businesses. A UGB separates an urban area from its surrounding greenbelt of natural and agricultural lands, and helps encourage infill development, especially near transit. UGBs are set for significant periods of time-typically 20 years or more. In the Bay Area, it's a proven tool to prevent urban sprawl. What is sprawl? Sprawl is the spread of a city away from central urban areas and transit into low-density communities, largely consisting of single-family homes in subdivisions, auto-centered strip malls, and parking lots. Sprawl is an expensive proposition As housing prices escalate, some are quick to blame smart growth and UGBs, and say that expanding our cities into open space and agricultural lands will solve our affordable housing crisis. The evidence doesn't support this view; rather, multiple studies show that sprawl is far more expensive than smart growth. A 2015 study found that sprawl costs America over $1 trillion, and can increase per-capita land consumption by up to 80% and car use by up to 60%.1 Providing water, sewer, roads, and other services to far-flung neighborhoods is very costly for local governments. Smart growth allows more affordable housing types at increased densities, reduces land requirements per household, has lower public service costs, and reduces transportation costs. The higher housing prices that urban residents may pay will be offset by lower transportation costs, energy costs, and better access to jobs, services, and amenities in more centralized locations.ii Transportation costs rise as density decreases Suburban residents are expected to drive three times as much as urban drivers, who rely more heavily on walking, biking, and public transit.m A San Francisco State University study found a 10% increase in compact development and smart growth amenities resulted in a 20% decrease in vehicle miles traveled.iv It also found that building compactly was more 312 Sutter St1eet, Suite 510 San Francisco, CA 94108 greenbelt. org March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 106 SAN FRANCISCO SAN JOSE SANTA ROSA WALNUT CREEK GREENBELT ALLIANCE successful in reducing vehicle miles traveled (VMT) than various taxing structures (such as a fuel charge). Furthermore, the estimated annual costs per household to provide roads in the most sprawled communities averaged $804.74 in comparison to $19.87 in the highest density communities.v Sprawl causes more traffic Building or expanding roads to serve new or existing sprawl only increases congestion through "induced demand."vi Adding road capacity encourages people to take longer trips or more trips by car. A recent $1 billion infrastructure investment to widen 1-405 in Los Angeles resulted in commute times one minute slower than before the widening. vii This in turn only lengthens driver's commutes. Drivers with a 30-minute commute will spend on average 87 hours dealing with traffic delays over the course of one year. viii That's over 3V:z days of sitting in congestion. Furthermore, the estimated annual costs per household to provide roads in the most sprawled communities averaged $804.74 in comparison to $19.87 in the highest density communities.1x Sprawl is harmful to our health Numerous studies have shown how urban sprawl negatively affects our health .x Cities built around automobile use provide fewer opportunities to exercise than walkable and bikable cities.xi Vehicles release air pollutants, including ozone, carbon, and airborne particulates, that are harmful to both wildlife and humans. Air pollution is a known cause of some respiratory problems, such as asthma and lung cancer.x" Studies have linked increased VMT to rising obesity rates, diabetes potential, chronic illness effects, inactivity, and mental health impacts.xiii People living in less walkable communities have a 50% higher rate of diabetes as compared to the most walkable communities.xlv Thirty-five percent of people in walkable neighborhoods are overweight, compared with 60% in sprawl neighborhoods.xv Another study found there was a positive correlation between the degree of sprawl and the amount of traffic and pedestrian fatalities in the largest 101 U.S. metropolitan areas.xvi For every 1% increase in the study's density metric, the traffic fatality and pedestrian rates decreased by 1.49% and 1.47%, respectively. Sprawl makes us unhappy One study found that people who endure a more-than 45-minute commute are 40% more likely to divorce.xvu People who live in car-dependent sprawl neighborhoods are much less trusting of other people than people who live in walkable, mixed-use, and transit-oriented neighborhoods. Another study found that someone with a one-hour commute has to earn 40% more money to be as satisfied with life as someone who walks to the office .xvm For a single person, exchanging a long commute for a short walk to work has the same effect on happiness as finding a new love. Sprawl residents pay more for public services Sprawl requires more expensive public services than smart growth. For example, a new development on the outskirts of a city requires police and fire services. Because this development is more distant, more officers may need to be working at a time to cover the additional area. The further a home is from a fire station, the higher its property insurance rates to address a low fire rating.xlx One study found that a fire station in a low-density neighborhood serves one-quarter of households at four times the cost of an otherwise identical fire station in a more compact neighborhood .xx greenbelt. org Page 2 of 5 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 107 SAN FRANCISCO SAN JOSE SANTA ROSA WALNUT CREEK GREENBELT ALLIANCE Similarly, the costs of municipal services also rise as sprawl increases. Denser communities pay less to provide infrastructure and services including water, roads, solid waste, libraries, parks and recreation, governance, and more.""; A city's annual average household cost for public services is $1,416 in high-density areas, and up to a whopping $3,462 in sprawling areas. Sprawl uses more water As lot sizes increase, water consumption increases largely due to the increased irrigation needs. In San Francisco, the average resident uses just 45.7 gallons of water per day, the lowest in all of California . Smart growth development tends to have less water-consuming landscaping. A 2015 report from Energy Innovation and Cal thorpe Associates found annual per-capita water use almost doubled from 25,000 gallons in "urban" development to 44,000 gallons in "standard" development.xxii An analysis comparing current Bay Area development trends to a more smart growth scenario for future development found that the smart growth scenario would reduce water consumption by 9%. Denser development also helps reduce water lost to leaky pipes . A 2014 report from the American WaterWorks Association found that California leaks about 228 billion gallons of water per year from municipal water infrastructure-the pipes that move water to where we live and work. This represents 25% of the total water in the system, which is about the annual water demand for the entire City of Los Angeles. Building within our existing UGBs instead of expanding into open spaces or agricultural lands creates less opportunities for leaks simply because fewer miles of pipes will be necessary to serve development. UGBs promote economic prosperity Compact and contiguous development increases the ease of access to local businesses . Smart growth can lead to increased productivity and business activity, where people live within walking distance of more businesses, parks, and services. By reducing transportation costs, residents are more likely to purchase locally produced goods, which increases regional employment and productivity."'iil UGBs protect our natural values T he open space and agricultural lands next to our cities provide a vast range of ecosystem services. Water filtration, water storage and runoff, clean air, pollination, carbon capture, recreation, and natural beauty are just some of the services that our open space provides. Without our natural and agricultural lands, we would have to cover the costs for providing these services. For example, if the City of New York did not protect its watershed and drinking water supplies, it would have to pay $6 billion to $10 billion in water filtration plant capital co sts and more than $300 million per year in operations.'"iv There is also great economic value of open space and parks within cities . It is estimated that the parks within San Francisco alone provide $959 million in value (direct use, health, property values, tourism, cleaning and storing water, etc .) per year.xxv Protecting our natural and agricultural lands from sprawl development also protects our water supply. In the Bay Area, about 30% of our water comes from local rivers , streams, and groundwater aquifers . More than a quarter of all the land in our region-1.2 million acres-serve as watersheds and groundwater infiltration zones that replenish these local water sources . Paving over critical wa ter resource lands puts these local sources in jeopardy. greenbe!t.org Page 3 of 5 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 108 SAN FRANCISCO SAN JOSE SANTA ROSA WALNUT CREEK GREENBELT ALLIANCE There's plenty of tand available inside UGBs Plan Bay Area, our regional blueprint for land-use and transportation planning, clearly shows we have enough space within our existing urban footprint to accommodate 100% of the region's future growth through 2040. This means all growth will be infill development or within established UGBs. The methodology behind this analysis in Plan Bay Area was designed to meet the existing and projected housing needs of people at all income levels throughout the region. Our regional planning agencies, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission and the Association of Bay Area Governments, developed this methodology to achieve multiple goals, including increasing the supply, diversity, and affordability of housing; promoting infill development; promoting an improved intraregional relationship between jobs and housing; protecting environmental resources; and promoting socio-economic equity. This analysis shows that there are many available opportunities for more housing within our existing urban footprint and inside our UGBs. We should focus efforts on building the region's next generation of new homes and new jobs within this footprint. People want to live in multi-unit housing close to transit Recent trends show people are increasingly attracted to living in dense urban areas, and urban populations are growing faster than suburban and rural areas. A recent analysis of U.S. census data shows that urban populations are growing faster than suburban or rural populations and employment centers in the country's major metropolitan areas have faster job growth.xxvi In particular, those aged 25-34 with a bachelor's degree or higher level of education are migrating to the large metropolitan areas, stimulating economic growth. "In 2000, young adults with a four-year degree were about 77 percent more likely to live in close in urban neighborhoods than other metro residents. Now, these well-educated young adults are about 126 percent more likely to live in these close-in urban neighborhoods."xxvii Younger adults prefer similar locations with urban amenities, and they prioritize short commutes. Currently, 34% of Millennials in the Bay Area live in apartments, compared to 21% of Gen Xers and 11% of Baby Boomers. The same number of millennials intends to remain in apartments in the future.xx•ui The Urban Land Institute found that the construction of multi-family housing in urban locations in the Bay Area increased from 35% of total housing construction in the 1990s to nearly 50% in the 2000s; in 2010, it represented 65% of all housing construction. It projects that demand for multi-family housing will increase as seniors downsize and seek greater access to shops and services. Indeed, the current single-family housing stock provides a large supply relative to future demand, and an oversupply is projected by 2040 . Greenbelt Alliance's Grow Smart Bay Area report found that if the Bay Area redevelops opportunity sites with homes and businesses in ways that are consistent with community visions, and if city plans succeed, our cities and towns have plenty of room to accommodate all our new residents and workers. Done right, infill development will improve the quality of life in our neighborhoods, with safer streets, more homes people can afford, and more services close by. Focusing growth within our existing cities and towns will also protect the iconic landscapes that provide us with local food, clean water, and places to enjoy the outdoors. greenbelt.org Page 4 ofS March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 109 SAN FRANCISCO SAN JOSE SANTA ROSA WALNUT CREEK GREENBELT ALLIANCE 1 Victoria Transport Policy Institute and LSE Cities. Analysis of Public Policies That Unintentionally Encourage and Subsidize Urban Sprawl. March 2015. ii The Brookings Institute. The Link Between Growth Management and Housing Affordability: The Academic Evidence. 2012. Hi Sustainable Prosperity. The Cost of Sprawl. 2014 iv Dr. Sudip Chattopadhyay. Do Smart Growth Strategies Have a Role in Curbing Vehicle Miles Traveled in California? A Further Assessment Using Household Level Survey Data. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 2012. v David Thompson. Suburban Sprawl: Exposing Hidden Costs, Identifying Innovations. University of Ottawa, 2013. vi Gilles Duran ton and Matthew A. Turner. The Fundamental Law of Road Congestion: Evidence from US Cities. 2011. vii Data analysis conducted by INRIX, a traffic data analysis corporation. vii! Tom Tom. Tom Tom Traffic Index: Measuring Congestion Worldwide. ix David Thompson. Suburban Sprawl: Exposing Hidden Costs, Identifying Innovations. University of Ottawa, 2013. x David B. Resnik. Urban Sprawl, Smart Growth, and Deliberative Democracy. American Journal of Public Health, Oct 2010. xi Howard Frumkin, Lawrence Frank, and Richard Jackson. Urban Sprawl and Public Health. 2004. xH David B. Resnik. Urban Sprawl, Smart Growth, and Deliberative Democracy. American Journal of Public Health, Oct 2010. xiii Sustainable Prosperity. The Cost of Sprawl. 2014. xiv A. Motluk. Neighbourhood Health. University of Toronto Magazine, Winter 2013. See also, for example, V. Russell-Evans. Expanding cities and expanding waistlines: Urban sprawl and its impact on obesity, how the adoption of smart growth statutes can build healthier and more active communities. 2009. xv Howard Frumkin, Lawrence Frank, and Richard J acks.on. Urban Sprawl and Public Health: Designing, Planning, and Building for Healthy Communities. 2005. xvi R. Ewing, R. Schieber, and C. Zegeer. Urban Sprawl as a Risk Factor in Motor Vehicle Occupant and Pedestrian Fatalities. American Journal of Public Health, Sept 2003 xvii Erica Sandow, Umea University. On the road: Social aspects of commuting long distances to work. 2011. xviii Alois Stutzer and Bruno Frey. Stress that doesn't pay: the Commuting Paradox. 2004. xix Steve Mouzon. Costs of Sprawl-Part 1. Original Green, Mar. 20ll. xx Todd Litman. Understanding Smart Growth Savings: Evaluating Economic Savings and Benefits of Compact Development, and How They Are Misrepresented By Critics. Victoria Transport Policy Institute, 2015. xxi Sustainable Prosperity. The Cost of Sprawl. 2014. xxil Energy Innovation and Calthorpe Associates. Moving California Forward-How Smart Growth can Help California Reach its 2030 Climate Target While Creating Economic and Environmental Co-Benefits. 2015. "Urban" development is defined as moderate to high density urban centers, consisting largely of multifamily and attached single-family homes, with some smaller lot single-family homes. "Standard" development is defined in part as largely consisting of separate-use, auto- oriented development. xxiii Todd Litman. Understanding Smart Growth Savings: Evaluating Economic Savings and Benefits of Compact Development, and How They Are Misrepresented By Critics. Victoria Transport Policy Institute, 2015. xxiv See New York State Department of Environmental Conservation's New York City Watershed Program xxv The Trust for Public Land. The Economic Benefits of San Francisco's Park and Recreation System. 2014. xxvi Joe Cortright. City Report: Surging City Center Job Growth. 2015. xxvii Joe Cortright. City Report: The Young and the Restless and the Nation's Cities. 2014. xxviii Urban Land Institute. Bay Area in 2015. 2015. greenbe/t.org Page 5 ofS March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 110 Attachment 12 Urban Limit Line (ULL) and the Potential 2016 CCTA Sales Tax Measure Preliminary Alternatives I. Make no changes related to the ULL in the Transportation Expenditure Plan (TEP). II. Eliminate the 30-acre exception provision. Under such a scenario, cities/County would not be prevented from approving changes to their ULL at the Council/Board level (consistent with their ordinance code), but if they made such a change they would forego return to source funding from the 2016 tax measure unless the change was approved by the voters. III. Adjust one or more provisions in the 2016 TEP related to the allowable circumstances for Board/Council approval of changes to their ULL without foregoing return to source funding from the new measure and without putting the change before the voters. Below are some alternatives, grouped into categories based on the type of approach: CONSISTENCY a) Ensure that the Authority clarifications apply to all jurisdictions for return to source purposes (see 2007 letter from Robert McCleary to Dennis Barry and Brentwood’s and Oakley’s inclusion of these provisions into their ULL resolutions). b) Ensure consistency among jurisdictions on the requirements for approving a minor ULL change and receiving return to source funding (e.g. require all jurisdictions to adopt one or more of seven findings included in Measure L and to approve such changes by a supermajority vote) CLARIFICATION c) Clarify the intent of one or more of the findings and the Authority clarifications. For instance, the TEP could clarify the types of topographic features that could be the basis for making a finding on the basis of topography. Or the TEP could clarify that infill development opportunities are fully considered in a study concluding that a ULL change is needed to provide housing. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 111 FREQUENCY AND MAGNITUDE d) Limit the number of modifications to the Urban Limit Line a Board/Council may approve every year or in a five-year period. e) Limit the cumulative acreage that a Board/Council may adjust their ULL without voter approval before the next modification is made. f) Reduce the size of the exemption from 30 acres down to some smaller number. MITIGATION g) Set mitigation standards/requirements for any change (e.g., permanent protection of a substantial amount of land of the same type being affected to offset the amount added to the ULL) h) Add provisions that help ensure that minor changes facilitate establishment of a permanent edge of urban development PHASE-IN ELIMINATION OF 30-ACRE EXEMPTION i) Phase in the elimination of the 30-acre exemption or other change. Measure L expires in 2026. Perhaps use that as the date. LIMIT THE EXEMPTION TO CERTAIN LAND USES j) Limit the types of projects eligible for a 30-acre exception (e.g., allow for “clean- up” or other designated types of development but not for others). March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 112 Attachment 13, Comparison of Requirements for ULL Changes (less than 30- acre, without voter approval) Jurisdiction Measure L Findings Required1 Includes Authority Clarifications2 Supermajority Required Notes County    Staff acknowledged Authority clarifications but the Board of Supervisors may not have ratified them Jurisdictions including all Measure L findings Lafayette  Explicitly lists Measure L conditions for ULL changes Jurisdictions with some Measure L findings and “Authority Clarifications” on “Non-Consecutive” Brentwood Partial 3 Explicitly allows adjustments to reflect topography or legal boundaries, one of the Measure L conditions Oakley Partial 3 Explicitly allows adjustments to reflect topography or legal boundaries, one of the Measure L conditions Jurisdictions incorporating most Measure L conditions for ULL adjustments Concord Orinda Richmond Partial Resolution identifies five conditions similar to those in Measure L under which the ULL could be modified Jurisdictions allowing ULL adjustments only for takings or conformance with law Clayton Moraga Pinole San Pablo Changes to ULL limited to address issues of unconstitutional takings, or to conform to state and federal law Jurisdictions with no identified conditions or procedures for adjusting ULL Danville It is unclear whether resolution allows ULL modifications; it identifies no conditions under which, or procedures through which, the ULL could be modified 1 See Attachment 14 list of findings from county Measure L. 2 See Attachment 16, including letter from Bob McCleary to Dennis Barry dated September 20, 2007. 3 See Attachment 17, Oakley ULL resolution, including Exhibit 1 stating their interpretation of Authority clarifications March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 113 Jurisdiction Measure L Findings Required1 Includes Authority Clarifications2 Supermajority Required Notes Jurisdictions that may adopt future conditions for allowing ULL adjustments El Cerrito Hercules Martinez Pleasant Hill Walnut Creek Resolution identifies “other conditions…may be subsequently adopted” under which the ULL could be modified Jurisdictions with Local, Voter-Approved ULL Antioch n/a n/a n/a No changes allowed through December 31, 2020 except with voter approval; after December 31, 2020, it “may be amended or repealed by any procedure authorized by state and local law.” Pittsburg n/a n/a n/a No changes allowed except with voter approval San Ramon Separate conditions  Measure G (1999) allows up to 25 acre additions to the San Ramon UGB under specified conditions and with a supermajority vote of Council March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 114 Attachment 14--Excerpts from the County Code Related to the Urban Limit Line 82-1.006 - 65/35 land preservation standard. Urban development in the county shall be limited to no more than thirty-five percent of the land in the county. At least sixty-five percent of all land in the county shall be preserved for agriculture, open space, wetlands, parks and other nonurban uses. 82-1.008 - Changes to the 65/35 land preservation plan. No change shall be made in the new general plan after its adoption that would result in greater than thirty- five percent of the land in the county being permitted for urban development. This limitati on shall not prevent any increase in agriculture, open space, parks, wetlands or other nonurban uses to greater than sixty-five percent of the land in the county. 82-1.010 - Urban limit line. To ensure the enforcement of the 65/35 standard set forth in Section 82-1.006, an urban limit line shall be established, in approximately the location depicted on the "Contra Costa County Urban Limit Line Map" adopted by the voters on November 7, 2006. The urban limit line is incorporated into the county's open space conservation plan. The urban limit line limits potential urban development in the county to thirty-five percent of the land in the county and prohibits the county from designating any land located outside the urban limit line for an urban land use. The criteria and factors for determining whether land should be considered for location outside the urban limit line should include (a) land which qualifies for rating as Class I and Class II in the Soil Conservation Service Land Use Capability Class ification, (b) open space, parks and other recreation areas, (c) lands with slopes in excess of twenty-six percent, (d) wetlands, and (e) other areas not appropriate for urban growth because of physical unsuitability for development, unstable geological conditions, inadequate water availability, the lack of appropriate infrastructure, distance from existing development, likelihood of substantial environmental damage or substantial injury to fish or wildlife or their habitat, and other similar factors. 82-1.018 - Changes to the urban limit line. (a) There shall be no change to the urban limit line that violates the 65/35 standard set forth in Section 82-1.006. Except as otherwise provided in this section, as long as there is no violation of the 65/35 standard, the urban limit line can be changed by a four-fifths vote of the board of supervisors after holding a public hearing and making one or more of the following findings based on substantial evidence in the record: (1) A natural or man-made disaster or public emergency has occurred which warrants the provision of housing and/or other community needs within land located outside the urban limit line; (2) An objective study has determined that the urban limit line is preventing the county from providing its fair share of affordable housing, or regional housing, as required by state law, and the board of supervisors finds that a change to the urban limit line is necessary and the only feasible means to enable the county to meet these requirements of state law; (3) A majority of the cities that are party to a preservation agreement and the county have approved a change to the urban limit line affecting all o r any portion of the land covered by the preservation agreement; March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 115 (4) A minor change to the urban limit line will more accurately reflect topographical characteristics or legal boundaries; (5) A five-year cyclical review of the urban limit line has determined, based on the criteria and factors for establishing the urban limit line set forth in Section 82-1.010 above, that new information is available (from city or county growth management studies or otherwise) or circumstances have changed, warranting a change to the urban limit line; (6) An objective study has determined that a change to the urban limit line is necessary or desirable to further the economic viability of the East Contra Costa County Airport, and either (i) mitigate adverse aviation-related environmental or community impacts attributable to Buchanan Field, or (ii) further the county's aviation related needs; or (7) A change is required to conform to applicable California or federal law. (b) Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, any proposed general plan amendment that would expand the urban limit line by more than thirty acres will require voter approval of the proposed general plan amendment in addition to and following a four -fifths vote of the board of supervisors approving the general plan amendment and making one or more of the findings required by subsection (a) of this section. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a proposed general plan amendment to expand the urban limit line by more than thirty acres does not require voter approval if, after a public hearing, the board of supervisors by a four -fifths vote makes either of the following findings based on substantial evidence in the record: (i) the expansion of the urban limit line is necessary to avoid an unconstitutional taking of private property; or (ii) the expansion of the urban limit line is necessary to comply with state or federal law. Proposed expansions of thirty acres or less do not require voter approval. (c) The board of supervisors may conduct a cyclical review of the urban limit line every five years. (d) The board of supervisors will review the boundary of the urban limit line in the year 2016. The purpose of the year 2016 review is to determine whether a change to the boundary of the county's urban limit line map is warranted, based on facts and circumstances resulting from the county's participation with the cities in a comprehensive review of the availability of land in Contra Costa County sufficient to meet housing and job needs for twenty years. This review of the urban limit line is in addition to any other reviews of the urban limit line the board of supervisors may conduct. (e) Any change to the urban limit line proposed as a result of any review authorized by this section will not be effective unless it is approved pursuant to the procedures set forth in this section. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 116 Measure J Transpor TaT ion s ales Tax e xpendi T ure p lan n ove M ber 2, 2004 29 An applicable ULL shall be defined as an urban limit line, urban growth boundary, or other equivalent physical boundary judged by the Authority to clearly identify the physical limits of the local jurisdiction’s area, including future urban development. Initial Action 1. The Board of Supervisors shall have, with the concurrence of each affected city, adjusted the existing County ULL on or before September 30, 2004, or as expeditiously as possible given the requirements of CEQA, to make the existing County ULL coterminous with city boundaries where it previously intruded inside those incor- porated boundaries. Establishing a Mutually Agreed-u pon Countywide u rban l imit l ine (“MAC- ull”) 2. The process to develop a MAC ULL shall have begun by July 1, 2004 with meetings in each sub region between one elected representative of each city and the county. The subregional meeting(s) will be followed by meetings between all of the cities and the county, each being represented by one elected representative. The discussion will include both the suggested ULL as well as crite- ria for establishing the line and future modifica- tions to the ULL. 3. On or before December 31, 2004, the County and the cities will cooperate in the development of a new MAC-ULL and criteria for future modifica- tions. To be considered a final proposal, the plan must be approved by 4 members of the Board of Supervisors and ¾ of the cities representing ¾ of the incorporated population. 4. The County will be the lead agency in connec- tion with any required environmental review and clearance on the proposed MAC-ULL. 5. After completion of the environmental review process, the proposal shall be submitted to the voters for ratification by November 2006. 6. The MAC-ULL will include provisions for peri- odic review (5 years) as well as provisions for minor (less than 30 acres) nonconsecutive ad- justments. 7. If there is a MAC-ULL, and a Town or City dis- agrees with that MAC-ULL, it may develop and submit a “LV- ULL” (see 8.b, below), or rely upon an existing voter approved ULL. Alternatives If There Is n o voter Approved MAC-ull or If a l ocal j urisdiction Chooses n ot to Concur with a voter-Approved MAC-ull 8. If no MAC-ULL is established by March 31, 2009, only local jurisdictions with one of the following applicable voter approved ULLs will be eligible to receive the 18% return to source funds or the 5% TLC funds. a. County ULL. A ULL placed on the ballot by the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors, adopted at a countywide election and in ef- fect through the applicable GMP compliance period, as its boundaries apply to the local jurisdiction, if: : aTTach M en T a p rinciples o F aG ree M en T F or e s Tablishin G T he u rban l i M i T l ine March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 117 Measure J Transpor TaT ion s ales Tax e xpendi T ure p lan 0 n ove M ber 2, 2004 (i) That ULL was approved by a majority of the local jurisdiction’s voters, either through a separate ballot measure or as part of the countywide election at which the measure was approved; (ii) The legislative body of the City or Town has accepted and approved, for purposes of compliance with the Measure J GMP, the County ULL boundaries for urban development as its applicable, voter ap- proved ULL; (iii) Revisions to a City or Town’s adopted County ULL boundary requires fulfill- ment of provisions (8.a.i) and (8.a.ii) above in their entirety; and (iv) A City of Town may adopt conditions for revising its adopted County ULL bound- ary by action of the City or Town’s leg- islative body, provided that the condi- tions limit the revisions of the physical boundary to adjustments of 30 or fewer acres, and/or to address issues of un- constitutional takings, or conformance to state and federal law. Such conditions may be adopted at the time of adop- tion of the County ULL, or subsequent- ly through amendment to the City or Town’s Growth Management Element to its General Plan. b. Local Voter ULL (LV-ULL). A local ULL or equiv- alent measure placed on the local jurisdiction ballot, approved by the jurisdiction’s voters, and recognized by action of the local jurisdic- tion’s legislative body as its applicable, voter approved ULL. A jurisdiction may revise or establish a new LV-ULL at any time using the procedure defined in this paragraph. c. Adjustments of 30 Acres or Less. A local ju- risdiction can undertake adjustments of 30 acres or less to its adopted ULL, consistent with these Principles, without voter approv- al. However, any adjustment greater than 30 acres requires voter approval and completion of the full County ULL or LV-ULL procedure as outlined above. Conditions of Compliance 9. Submittal of an annexation request by a local ju- risdiction to LAFCO outside of an applicable vot- er approved ULL will constitute non-compliance with the new Measure J Growth Management Plan. 10. For each jurisdiction, an applicable ULL shall be in place through each Measure J Growth Man- agement Program compliance period in order for the local jurisdiction to be eligible to receive the 18% return to source and the TLC funds for that period. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 118 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 119 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 120 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 121 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 122 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 123 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 124 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 125 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 126 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 127 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 128 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 129 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 130 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 131 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 132 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 133 RECOMMENDATION(S): CONSIDER waiving the 180-day “sit out period” for Dr. Domenic Cavallaro, Exempt Medical Staff Dentist in the Health Services Department; 1. FIND that the appointment of Dr. Cavallaro is necessary to fill a critically needed position;2. APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the hiring of retiree Dr. Cavallaro as a temporary employee for the period April 1, 2016 to March 31, 2017, at a total of 960 hours as recommended by the Health Services Department Director. 3. FISCAL IMPACT: Upon approval, this action has an annual cost of approximately $75,827.14 and the cost will be a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) revenue offset. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 03/08/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Arlene J. Lozada (925)957-5269 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: March 8, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: D.5 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Temporary Hire of County Retiree – Waiver of 180-day Sit-out Period March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 134 BACKGROUND: Dr. Domenic Cavallaro was hired as an Exempt Medical Staff Dentist on October 10, 2003 and will retire on March 31, 2016. Over the years, Dr. Cavallaro provided his dental expertise to County patients. Hiring him as a temporary retiree is critical to patient care at our various Health Centers located in Martinez, Pittsburg, Bay Point, and West County. He will cover for those dentists who will be on leave and he will also provide training to our new dentists. His experience as a senior dentist is extremely valuable to our patient care services. The Department will recruit a full-time employee replacement and this vacancy will be filled when we find the most qualified candidate. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this action is not approved, there will be a shortage of dental staff needed to meet patient care services at the various health centers CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: Not applicable. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 135 RECOMMENDATION(S): 1. CONSIDER waiving the 180 day "sit out" period for Bobby Romero, former Supervising Accountant in the Office of the Auditor-Controller's Property Tax division. 2. FIND that the appointment of Bobby Romero is necessary to fill a critically needed position; and 3. APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE the hiring of County retiree Bobby Romero as a temporary County employee effective March 14 through September 30, 2016. FISCAL IMPACT: Salary costs are included within the Department's operating budget. Total approximate cost for the requested period is $15,000. BACKGROUND: Mr. Romero retired at the end of December as a Supervising Accountant assigned to the Property Tax division. This is a request for approval from the Board of Supervisors to consider waiving the180 day "sit out" period so that we can hire Mr. Romero to work two (2) two days a week for approximately six (6) hours each day. Mr. Romero would be strictly assigned to provide training to the new professional staff and to oversee the development and update of all of the written procedures of the Division. It is imperative that all of the Property Tax functions are properly documented due to the complexity of the tax codes, laws, etc. Mr. Romero has the knowledge, experience, and necessary background to complete this critical task. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 03/08/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Elizabeth Verigin (925) 646-2185 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: March 8, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: Lisa Lopez, Assistant Director of Human Resources D.6 To:Board of Supervisors From:Robert Campbell, Auditor-Controller Date:March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Assistant Auditor Controller - Waiver of 180 day "Sit Out" Period March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 136 CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Failure to receive Board approval will result in significant delay in properly documenting complex property tax processes and procedures and providing quality training to the new professional accountant staff assigned to the Property Tax division. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 137 RECOMMENDATION(S): AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to advertise for the 2016 On-Call Sweeping Services Contract(s) for Various Road Maintenance Work, for routine maintenance of existing road pavement, Countywide. (100% Local Road Funds) FISCAL IMPACT: 100% Local Road Funds. BACKGROUND: The Public Works Department will use the 2016 On-Call Sweeping Services Contract(s) for Various Road Maintenance Work to provide supplemental sweeping services as needed to Public Works Maintenance crews for routine road maintenance repairs in various locations within the County. The Public Works Department intends to award at least one $200,000 contract, but not more than four $200,000 contracts, to the responsible bidder(s). Each contract will have a term of one year with the option of two one-year extensions, and will be used as needed with no minimum amount that has to be spent. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Where sweeping services are required, the Public Works Department may be unable to complete routine road maintenance work in a timely manner. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 03/08/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Kristen Hoy, 925-313-7006 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: March 8, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 2 To:Board of Supervisors From:Julia R. Bueren, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Advertise the 2016 On-Call Sweeping Services Contract(s) for Various Road Maintenance Work March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 138 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute, on behalf of the County, Contract Amendment No. 1 to the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement/Contribution Agreement between East Contra Costa Regional Fee and Financing Authority (ECCRFFA) and Contra Costa County for Phase 1 of the State Route 4 Bypass to increase the maximum reimbursement amount from $3.0 million to $3.35 million and extend the payment date from June 30, 2011 to June 30, 2020, East County area. FISCAL IMPACT: The Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement/Contribution Agreement involves disbursement of Proposition 1B funds for Phase 1 of the State Route 4 Bypass. Amendment No. 1 will increase the reimbursement to the County to account for interest. BACKGROUND: Proposition 1B was approved by voters at the November 7, 2006 general election. As part of the Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, Air Quality and Port Security Bond Act of 2006, it authorized the issuance of $19.9 billion APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 03/08/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Nancy Wein 925-313-2275 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: March 8, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 1 To:Board of Supervisors From:Julia R. Bueren, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Amendment No. 1 to the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement/Contribution Agreement with East Contra Costa Regional Fee and Financing Authority March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 139 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) of general obligation bonds to fund a variety of transportation priorities. Of the $19.9 billion, $2 billion was designated for cities and counties to fund the maintenance and improvement of local transportation facilities. The County received a total of approximately $24 million in Proposition 1B funds in four disbursements. The first disbursement was received in March 2008 in the amount of $9.7 million. Cities and counties were given three fiscal years from the end of the fiscal year the funds were received to expend the Proposition 1B funds. On March 11, 2008, the Board of Supervisors approved the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement/Contribution Agreement (Agreement) with ECCRFFA for use of Proposition 1B funds for Phase 1 of the State Route 4 Bypass. At that time, revenues for the State Route 4 Bypass were expected to come in at lower than expected levels resulting in funding shortfalls. The Agreement allowed the County to contribute $3 million of Proposition 1B funds to ECCRFFA to assist with funding shortfalls and assured that bond proceeds would be expended within the three-year timeline. In return, the County would receive $3 million of Regional Transportation Development Impact Fees for the Vasco Road Safety Improvement Project. The County has expended all allocations of Proposition 1B funds, including contribution of $3 million to ECCRFFA for Phase 1 of the State Route 4 Bypass. The original Agreement intended to include interest with the reimbursement, however, the interest was not included, which was strictly an oversight at the time. Thus, Amendment No. 1 provides for up to $350,000 in interest to be reimbursed to the County for a total not-to-exceed amount of $3,350,000. Interest is to be calculated as if the funds had been invested in the County Pooled Investment Earnings Account. Payment of funds by ECCRFFA is to be made a priority and must be completed by June 30, 2020. ECCRFFA has already approved Amendment No. 1 at the Board of Directors Meeting held on January 14, 2016. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The County will not receive reimbursement from ECCRFFA for interest on Proposition 1B funds contributed to Phase 1 of the State Route 4 Bypass. ATTACHMENTS ECCRFFA signed Prop 1B Agreement Amendment No. 1 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 140 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 141 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 142 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 143 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 144 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 145 RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2016/107 accepting completion of warranty period for the Road Improvement Agreement and release of cash deposit for faithful performance for RA11-01247 (cross-reference SD05-09037), a project developed by Shapell Homes, a Division of Shapell Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Danville area. (District III) FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact to County funds, The funds to be released are developer fees that have been held on deposit. BACKGROUND: The public road improvements have met the guarantee performance standards for the warranty period following completion and acceptance of the improvements. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The developer will not receive a refund of the cash deposit, the Road Improvement Agreement and performance/maintenance surety bond will not be exonerated, and the billing account will not be liquidated and closed. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 03/08/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jocelyn La Rocque, 925-313-2315 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: March 8, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Public Works - Finance, Public Works - Design/Construction, Public Works - Engineering Services, Current Planning, Communtiy Development, Shapell Homes, a Division of Shapell Industries, Inc.,c/o Toll Brothers Inc.,, 6800 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 320, Pleasanton, CA 94566 Attn:Lori Stritt, The continental Insurance Sompany, 4150 N. Drinkwater Boulvard, Suite 410, , Scottsdale, AZ 85251, Attn: Pamela L. Stocks C. 4 To:Board of Supervisors From:Julia R. Bueren, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Accepting completion of warranty period and release of cash deposit for Road Improvement RA11-01247, Danville area March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 146 AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2016/107 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed: Resolution No. 2016/107 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 147 Recorded at the request of:Board of Supervisors Return To:Public Works Engineering Services THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 03/08/2016 by the following vote: AYE:John Gioia, District I SupervisorCandace Andersen, District II SupervisorMary N. Piepho, District III SupervisorKaren Mitchoff, District IV SupervisorFederal D. Glover, District V Supervisor NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2016/107 IN THE MATTER OF accepting completion of warranty period for the Road Improvement Agreement and release of cash deposit for faithful performance, for RA11-01247 (cross-reference SD05-09037), for a project developed by Shapell Homes, a Division of Shapell Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Danville area (District III) WHEREAS On December 4, 2012 this Board resolved that the improvements for RA11-01247 (cross-reference SD05-0937) were completed as provided in the Road Improvement Agreement with Shapell Homes, a Division of Shapell Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation and now on the recommendation of the Public Works Director; The board hereby FINDS that the improvements have satisfactorily met the guaranteed performance standards for the period following completion and acceptance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Public Works Director is AUTHORIZED to REFUND the $4,800.00 cash deposit (Auditor's Deposit Permit No. 590096, dated June 27, 2011) plus interest to Shapell Homes, a Division of Shapell Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation in accordance with Government Code Section 53079, if appropriate, Ordinance Code Section 94-4.406, and the Subdivision Agreement. Contact: Jocelyn La Rocque, 925-313-2315 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: March 8, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Public Works - Finance, Public Works - Design/Construction, Public Works - Engineering Services, Current Planning, Communtiy Development, Shapell Homes, a Division of Shapell Industries, Inc.,c/o Toll Brothers Inc.,, 6800 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 320, Pleasanton, CA 94566 Attn:Lori Stritt, The continental Insurance Sompany, 4150 N. Drinkwater Boulvard, Suite 410, , Scottsdale, AZ 85251, Attn: Pamela L. Stocks March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 148 March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes149 RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2016/106 accepting completion of warranty period for the Subdivision Agreement and release of cash deposit for faithful performance, subdivision SD06-09134, for a project developed by Shapell Homes, a Division of Shapell Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, as recommended by the Public Works Director, San Ramon (Dougherty Valley) area. (District II) FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact to County funds. The funds to be released are developer fees that have been held on deposit. BACKGROUND: The public road improvements have met the guarantee performance standards for the warranty period following completion and acceptance of the improvements. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The developer will not recieve a refund of the cash deposit, the Subdivision Agreement and performance/maintenance surety bond will not be exonerated, and the billing account will not be liquidated and closed. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 03/08/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jocelyn LaRocque, 925-313-2315 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: March 8, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Public Works - Design/Construction, Public works - Engineering Services, Current Planning, Community Development, Shapell Homes, a Division of Shapell Industries, Inc., c/o toll Brothers Inc., , 6800 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 320, Pleasanton, CA 94566, Attn: Lori Stritt, The Continental Insurance Company, 4150 N. Drinkwater Boulevard, Suite 410, , Scottsdale, AZ 85251, Attn: Pamela L. Stocks , C. Low, City of San Ramon, 2222 Camino Ramon, San Ramon, CA 94583 C. 5 To:Board of Supervisors From:Julia R. Bueren, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Accepting completion of warranty period and release of cash deposit for Subdivision SD06-09134, San Ramon (Dougherty Valley) area. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 150 AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2016/106 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Res No. 2016/106 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 151 Recorded at the request of:Board of Directors Return To:Public Works Engineering Services THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 03/08/2016 by the following vote: AYE:John Gioia, District I SupervisorCandace Andersen, District II SupervisorMary N. Piepho, District III SupervisorKaren Mitchoff, District IV SupervisorFederal D. Glover, District V Supervisor NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2016/106 IN THE MATER OF accepting completion of warranty period for the Subdivision Agreement and release of cash deposit for faithful performance, for Subdivision SD06-09134, for a project developed by Shapell Homes, a Division of Shapell Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, as recommended by the Public Works Director, San Ramon (Dougherty Valley) area. (District II) WHEREAS On October 28, 2014, this Board resolved that the improvements in subdivision SD06-09134 were completed as provided in the Subdivision Agreement with Shapell Homes, a Division of Shapell Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation and now on the recommendation of the Public Works Director; The Board hereby FINDS that the improvements have satisfactorily met the guaranteed performance standards for the period following completion and acceptance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Public Works Director is AUTHORIZED to REFUND the $19,000.00 cash deposit (Auditor's Deposit Permit No. 1312441, dated April 18, 2013) plus interest to Shapell Homes, a Division of Shapell Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation in accordance with Government Code Section 53079, if appropriate, Ordiance Code Section 94-4.406, and the subdivision agreement. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that upon completion of the warranty and maintenance period, the San Ramon City Council shall accept the landscape improvements for maintenance and ownership in accordance with the Dougherty Valley Memorandum of Understanting. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the warranty period has been completed and the Subdivision Agreement and surety bond, Bond No. 929 596 042, dated March 15, 2013, issued by The Continental Insurance Company, are exonerated. Contact: Jocelyn LaRocque, 925-313-2315 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: March 8, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Public Works - Design/Construction, Public works - Engineering Services, Current Planning, Community Development, Shapell Homes, a Division of March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 152 cc: Public Works - Design/Construction, Public works - Engineering Services, Current Planning, Community Development, Shapell Homes, a Division of Shapell Industries, Inc., c/o toll Brothers Inc., , 6800 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 320, Pleasanton, CA 94566, Attn: Lori Stritt, The Continental Insurance Company, 4150 N. Drinkwater Boulevard, Suite 410, , Scottsdale, AZ 85251, Attn: Pamela L. Stocks , C. Low, City of San Ramon, 2222 Camino Ramon, San Ramon, CA 94583 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 153 March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes154 RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2016/109 approving and authorizing the Public Works Director, or designee, to partially close a portion of Parker Avenue, eastbound lanes between San Pablo Avenue and 6th Street, on March 12, 2016 from 9:00 a.m. through 9:20 a.m., for the purpose of the Annual Little League Opening Day Parade, Rodeo area. (District V) FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: Applicant shall follow guidelines set forth by the Public Works Department. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Applicant will be unable to close the road for planned activities. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 03/08/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Bob Hendry, 925-674-7744 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: March 8, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: CHP, Sheriff - Patrol Div. Commander C. 3 To:Board of Supervisors From:Julia R. Bueren, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:APPROVE and AUTHORIZE closing a portion of Parker Ave., for the Annual Little League Opening Day Parade, Rodeo area. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 155 AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2016/109 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed: Resolution No. 2016/109 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 156 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 03/08/2016 by the following vote: AYE: John Gioia Candace Andersen Mary N. Piepho Karen Mitchoff Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2016/109 ADOPT Resolution No. 2016/109 approving and authorizing the Public Works Director, or designee, to partially close a portion of Parker Avenue, east bound lanes between San Pablo Avenue and 6th Street, on March 12, 2016 from 9:00 AM through 9:20 AM, for the purpose of Little League Opening Day Parade, Rodeo area. (District V) RC16-2 IT IS BY THE BOARD RESOLVED that permission is granted to Rodeo Baseball to partially close Parker Avenue, east bound lanes between San Pablo Avenue and 6th Street, except for emergency traffic, on March 12, 2016 for the period of 9:00 AM through 9:20 AM, subject to the following conditions: 1. Traffic will be detoured via neighboring street per traffic control plan reviewed by Public Works. 2. All signing to be in accordance with the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. 3. Rodeo Baseball shall comply with the requirements of the Ordinance Code of Contra Costa County. 4. Provide the County with a Certificate of Insurance in the amount of $1,000,000.00 for Comprehensive General Public Liability which names the County as an additional insured prior to permit issuance. 5. Obtain approval for the closure from the Sheriff's Department, the California Highway Patrol and the Fire District. Contact: Bob Hendry, 925-674-7744 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: March 8, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: CHP, Sheriff - Patrol Div. Commander 5 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 157 March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes158 RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2016/105 establishing a rate of $30 per Equivalent Runoff Unit (ERU) for Stormwater Utility Area 17 (Unincorporated County) for Fiscal Year 2016/2017 and requesting that the Contra Costa County Flood Control & Water Conservation District (FC District) adopt annual parcel assessments for drainage maintenance and the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Program, Countywide. FISCAL IMPACT: The 2016-2017 rate per ERU is the same as was set for fiscal year 2015-2016. The unincorporated area of Contra Costa County will produce approximately $2,700,000. All associated costs funded 100% by Stormwater Utility Area 17 Funds. BACKGROUND: The Clean Water Program consists of the County, Contra Costa cities, and the FC District working together to prevent, reduce, or eliminate the discharge of pollutants into the storm drain system, including creeks and other natural waterways. The Clean Water Program was established in response to changes in the Federal Clean Water Act. The Program known at the federal level as the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Program for Municipal Stormwater APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 03/08/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Dan Jordan, (925) 313-2023 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: March 8, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Laura Strobel, County Administrator's Office, Bob Campbell, County Auditor–Controller, Letitia Watters, County Auditor–Controller’s Office, Tim Jensen, Flood Control, Cece Sellgren, County Watershed Program, Dan Jordan, County Watershed Program, Catherine Windham, Flood Control C. 7 To:Board of Supervisors From:Julia R. Bueren, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Adopt Resolution requesting the Flood Control District Adopt Annual Parcel Assessments for the County’s Watershed Program. Project #7517-6W7091 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 159 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Owners is in its fifteenth year. In order to be in compliance with the current NPDES permit, Clean Water Program participants implement a Stormwater Management Plan stipulating a set of activities and a performance or service level. The Stormwater Management Plan is a major component of the Joint Municipal NPDES Stormwater Permit with the California Regional Water Quality Control Boards and is paid for with stormwater utility fee assessments. Adoption of the attached resolution will begin the annual process of assessment adoption. The Board of Supervisors is being asked to set a rate of $30 for one ERU in the Unincorporated County areas and to request that the FC District adopt the stormwater utility assessment. (The FC District is the only entity under state law with legal authority to assess this particular assessment.) The Public Works Department coordinates the County Watershed Program for the County. Examples of how the assessment is being spent in the current year include: 1. General drainage maintenance to remove debris and sediment from County storm drain systems, flood control channels, and creeks. 2. Targeted street sweeping throughout the County. 3. Work with County Building Inspection and Public Works inspectors and construction companies/contractors to reduce construction contaminants, such as paint, cement, oil/fuels, and soil erosion from entering storm drains and creeks. 4. Encourage Planners and the development community to use new designs that will reduce contaminated stormwater runoff. 5. Educate the public on the benefits of reducing pesticides and other toxic household product use and their proper disposal. 6. Educate County Engineers and Maintenance staff on flood control design, construction, and maintenance practices that protect water quality and preserve natural watershed habitats. 7. Inspection of industrial and commercial businesses for evidence that spill prevention, equipment maintenance and cleaning, waste handling and disposal, and other business practices are done in a manner that minimizes stormwater contamination. 8. Educate marina operators and their marina users through a marina program. 9. Create an annual Watershed Calendar that is disseminated to all single-family households in the County to educate residents of pollution prevention measures that they can take to protect stormwater runoff and improve the water quality of our receiving waters. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If the rate per ERU is not set for the coming fiscal year, funds will not be available for the County’s Watershed Program to comply with the Joint Municipal NPDES Stormwater Permit. The Regional Water Quality Control Boards have the authority to issue fines of up to $10,000 per day against those municipalities that do not comply with the Permit and fail to implement their Stormwater Management Plans. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2016/105 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed: Resolution No. 2016/105 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 160 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 03/08/2016 by the following vote: AYE: John Gioia Candace Andersen Mary N. Piepho Karen Mitchoff Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2016/105 In The Matter of: ESTABLISH the rate per equivalent runoff unit for Stormwater Utility Area 17 (Unincorporated County) for Fiscal Year 2016-2017 and request that the Contra Costa County Flood Control & Water Conservation District (FC District) ADOPT an annual parcel assessment for drainage maintenance and the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Program, Countywide. (100% Stormwater Utility Area 17 Funds) The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County RESOLVES THAT; WHEREAS, under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, prescribed discharges of stormwater require a permit from the appropriate California regional water quality board under the NPDES Program; and WHEREAS, the COUNTY of CONTRA COSTA (County) did apply for, and did receive, an NPDES permit, which requires the implementation of selected Best Management Practices (BMPs) to minimize or eliminate pollutants from entering stormwaters; and WHEREAS, it is the intent of the County to utilize funds received from its Stormwater Utility Area (SUA) for implementation of the NPDES Program and drainage maintenance activities; and WHEREAS, at the request of the County, the FC District has completed the process for formation of an SUA, including the adoption of the Stormwater Utility Assessment Drainage Ordinance NO. 93-47; and WHEREAS, the SUA and Program Group Costs Payment agreement between the County and the FC District requires that the County determine the rate to be assessed to a single Equivalent Runoff Unit (ERU) for the forthcoming fiscal year in the Unincorporated County; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the County Board of Supervisors of the COUNTY of CONTRA COSTA does determine that the rate to be assigned to a single ERU for Fiscal Year 2016-2017 shall be set at $30. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the County Board of Supervisors does hereby request the FC District to adopt SUA 17 levies based on said amount. Contact: Dan Jordan, (925) 313-2023 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: March 8, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Laura Strobel, County Administrator's Office, Bob Campbell, County Auditor–Controller, Letitia Watters, County Auditor–Controller’s Office, Tim Jensen, Flood Control, Cece Sellgren, County Watershed Program, Dan Jordan, County Watershed Program, Catherine Windham, Flood Control 5 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 161 March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes162 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Chief Engineer, Flood Control & Water Conservation District, or designee, to execute, on behalf of the Contra Costa Clean Water Program, a contract amendment with Larry Walker Associates, Inc., to increase the payment limit by $62,843, to a new payment limit not to exceed $202,843, for general technical support services necessary to comply with federal and state stormwater rules contained in National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permits issued by the San Francisco Bay and Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Boards. Countywide. (100% Cities and County Stormwater Utility Fee Assessments) Project No. 7519-6x7616. FISCAL IMPACT: The cost is estimated to be $62,843; and, shall be funded by stormwater utility fee assessments collected by the Cities/Towns and County, proportional to their respective populations. BACKGROUND: The Contra Costa Clean Water Program (the “CCCWP”) consists of Contra Costa County, its nineteen (19) incorporated APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 03/08/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Deanna Constable 925-313-2194 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: March 8, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 6 To:Board of Supervisors From:Julia R. Bueren, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Approve an amended Contract with Larry Walker Associates for General Technical Support Services March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 163 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) cities/towns and the Contra Costa County Flood Control & Water Conservation District (hereinafter referred to collectively as "Permittees"). The CCCWP was established in 1991 through a Program Agreement in response to the 1987 amendments to the federal Clean Water Act (the “CWA”), which established a framework for regulating municipal stormwater discharges under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (“NPDES”) Permit Program. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (the “USEPA”) published final rules implementing the 1987 CWA amendments in November 1990. The rules mandate that Permittees obtain and implement stormwater permits designed to reduce and eliminate the discharge of pollutants into and from Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (the “MS4s”) they own and operate. Through the CCCWP, Permittees conduct many of the mandated activities collectively (referred to as "Group Activities"), such as water quality monitoring, special studies, and public education. The roles and responsibilities of the CCCWP and Permittees are outlined in the Program Agreement, which was last updated and adopted by all Permittees in June 2010. The CCCWP’s stormwater monitoring programs are designed to identify and evaluate sources, pathways, loadings and impacts of pollutants, such as mercury and PCBs, that reach local creeks and streams, and eventually into the San Francisco Bay/Delta; and, to investigate the effectiveness of stormwater treatment control technologies. Technical support services provided by Larry Walker Associates, Inc. (“Larry Walker”) are necessary to assist the CCCWP with compliance of these mandates. In order to help continue to maintain permit compliance, CCCWP staff, on behalf of the Permittees, respectfully requests approval of this amendment to increase the payment limit for this contract with Larry Walker for general technical support services. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If the Contract with Larry Walker Associates is not approved, the CCCWP would not be able to fulfill the permit mandates, and municipalities could be found in non-compliance with the NPDES permits issued by the Water Boards. Fines totaling $10,000 per day and $10 per gallon of stormwater discharge could potentially be imposed. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 164 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the conveyance of Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (District) property, identified as parcel FCPID 5155, and an access easement identified as FCPID 5154, to the City of Pinole; and ACCEPT a Grant of Easement for ingress and egress purposes, identified as FCPID 5153, from the City of Pinole (City) to the District, in accordance with Section 31 of the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Act. (CP#15-15) DETERMINE that the conveyances are no longer required for District purposes and that their estimated values do not exceed $25,000. DETERMINE that the activity is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to Article 5, Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines, and DIRECT the Director of Conservation and Development to file a Notice of Exemption with the County Clerk, and AUTHORIZE the Chief Engineer to arrange for payment of a $25 fee to the Department of Conservation and Development for processing, and a $50 fee to the County Clerk-Recorder for filing the Notice of Exemption. General Plan Conformance was obtained from the City of Pinole for this activity. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 03/08/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Angela Bell, 925-313-2337 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: March 8, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 8 To:Board of Supervisors From:Julia R. Bueren, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:APPROVE the conveyance of real property to the City of Pinole; ACCEPT Grant of Easement; APPROVE CEQA. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 165 RECOMMENDATION(S): (CONT'D) AUTHORIZE the Chair, Board of Supervisors, to execute a Grant Deed and Quitclaim Deed on behalf of the District. DIRECT the Real Estate Division of the Public Works Department to cause said Grant Deed and Quitclaim Deed to be delivered to the City for acceptance and recording. APPROVE and ACCEPT the Grant of Easement from the City of Pinole for ingress and egress purposes over City’s property. DIRECT the Real Estate Division of the Public Works Department to have the Grant of Easement recorded in the office of the County Recorder. FISCAL IMPACT: 100% Flood Control Permit Fees. BACKGROUND: The City plans to construct the Pinole-Hercules Wastewater Plant Upgrade Project (Project) in the Pinole area. The Project intends to upgrade its sewer plant facility located on the south side of the Pinole Creek Flood Control Channel and on the west side of Tennet Avenue. The cities of Pinole and Hercules have been working with the District to identify the real estate transactions needed for the Project. In 1965, the District acquired property interests from the City for the purpose of widening Pinole Creek Channel. Those interests included an easement for ingress and egress purposes (easement). A large portion of the easement is needed for the Project in order to upgrade the wastewater plant. The District will grant a portion of the easement to the City and in exchange, the City will provide the District with a Grant of Easement for ingress and egress rights over their property. In addition, during the design of the Project, the City found that the sewer plant has a fence encroaching into approximately 928 square feet of District owned property along the Pinole Creek. The District has determined that this area is no longer required for the District’s purpose and plans to convey the area to the City by Grant Deed. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Without approval and acceptance from the Board of Supervisors, the cities of Pinole and Hercules will not be able to move forward with the Project, and the District will continue to be responsible 928 square feet of property they are not using. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Grant Deed Quitclaim Deed Grant of Easement MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed: Grant Deed Signed: QuitClaim Deed March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 166 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 167 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 168 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 169 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 170 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 171 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 172 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 173 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 174 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 175 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 176 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 177 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 178 March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes179 March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes180 March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes181 March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes182 March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes183 March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes184 March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes185 RECOMMENDATION(S): DENY claims filed by Daniel Franklin, Karen McDuffie-Smith, Dennis Salopagio, and Darrell Sanders. FISCAL IMPACT: No Fiscal Impact. BACKGROUND: * APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 03/08/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Joellen Balbas 925-335-1906 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: March 8, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 9 To:Board of Supervisors From:David Twa, County Administrator Date:March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:claims March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 186 APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 03/08/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Beth Ward 335-8372 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: March 8, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stephanie Mello, Deputy cc: C. 13 To:Board of Supervisors From:Beth Ward, Animal Services Director Date:March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:ASD Service Award 30 yr Sgt Terry DeCosta March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 187 AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2016/93 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution No. 2016/93 (c) Signed Resolution No. 2016/93 Confidential documents are indicated with a (c). March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 188 In the matter of:Resolution No. 2016/93 Honoring Sergeant Terry DeCosta for her Thirty Years of Dedicated Service in the Contra Costa County Animal Services Department. WHEREAS Terry DeCosta began her career with the Contra Costa County Animal Services Department as an Animal Services Officer on December 2, 1985; and WHEREAS, because of Terry's industrious nature and commitment, she was promoted to Animal Services Sergeant on January 11, 2001; and WHEREAS Terry has diligently performed her duties as an Animal Services Sergeant with devotion and compassion; and WHEREAS Terry has dedicated numerous hours to forming a County Livestock Emergency Evacuation Response Team; and WHEREAS Terry has received and continues to receive letters of appreciation from the general public based on her kindness in the performance of her duties; and WHEREAS Contra Costa County Animal Services recognizes Terry's dedication and loyalty to her position for the past thirty years; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors recognizes Sergeant Terry DeCosta for her thirty years of dedicated service to Contra Costa County and for the high quality of work she performed and continues to perform for the Animal Services Department. ___________________ CANDACE ANDERSEN Chair, District II Supervisor ______________________________________ JOHN GIOIA MARY N. PIEPHO District I Supervisor District III Supervisor ______________________________________ KAREN MITCHOFF FEDERAL D. GLOVER District IV Supervisor District V Supervisor I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: March 8, 2016 David J. Twa, By: ____________________________________, Deputy March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 189 PR.3, C.13 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 190 APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 03/08/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Lia Bristol, (925) 521-7100 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: March 8, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stephanie Mello, Deputy cc: C. 15 To:Board of Supervisors From:Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Date:March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Honoring Joseph L. Campbell for his 25 Years of Service on the Contra Costa Water District Board of Directors March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 191 AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2016/112 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution No. 2016/112 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 192 In the matter of:Resolution No. 2016/112 In the Matter of Honoring Joseph L. Campbell for his 25 years of service on the Contra Costa Water District Board of Directors Whereas, Mr. Campbell was first elected to the Contra Costa Water District’s Board of Directors in 1991 and most recently served as Board President, a role he has held most of his years on the Board; and Whereas, Mr. Campbell represents eastern Concord, Clayton and part of Walnut Creek and Pleasant Hill. Mr. Campbell’s “passion” is heavy construction and engineering. After 23 years in the heavy construction industry, Mr. Campbell sold his firm (Joseph L. Campbell, Inc.) in 1989. He is currently an independent businessman; and Whereas, in 1988, Mr. Campbell served as co-chairman and a key fundraiser for the successful campaign to approve bonds for the District’s $450 million Los Vaqueros Reservoir Project, and he belonged to the steering committee for the statewide campaign against the Peripheral Canal in 1982; and Whereas, until his election to the water district governing board, Mr. Campbell served as chair of the Contra Costa County Airport Land Use Commission, which regulates development that could affect air traffic safety at the county airports in Concord and Byron. He is a commercial pilot, and holds a single and multi-engine license with an instrument rating; and Whereas, Mr. Campbell is a former vice president of the Concord Chamber of Commerce, and served as a member of the Concord General Plan Committee and the Founder Advisory Board of Concord Commercial Bank; and Whereas, Mr. Campbell is a member of the Board of Directors of the East Bay Leadership Council and a member of the Concord Rotary Club. He is an Honorary Board Member of the Concord Historical Society; and Whereas, he is a former member of the Walnut Creek Child Care Task Force, former parade chairman for the Walnut Festival Association, former board member of the Northgate High School Sports Boosters, and a former board member for the American Red Cross; and Whereas, Mr. Campbell is past president and a founder of the Concord Economic Development Corporation, a partnership of the Concord Chamber of Commerce and the City of Concord. Now, Therefore, Be It Resolved that the Board of Supervisors does hereby honor Joseph L. Campbell for the years of dedication and service to Contra Costa County and for his exemplary leadership on water issues and commitment to improving the lives of Contra Costa residents. ___________________ CANDACE ANDERSEN Chair, District II Supervisor ______________________________________ JOHN GIOIA MARY N. PIEPHO District I Supervisor District III Supervisor ______________________________________ KAREN MITCHOFF FEDERAL D. GLOVER District IV Supervisor District V Supervisor I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 193 ATTESTED: March 8, 2016 David J. Twa, By: ____________________________________, Deputy March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 194 PR.2, C.15 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 195 FISCAL IMPACT: None. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 03/08/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: L. DeLaney, 925-335-1097 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: March 8, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stephanie Mello, Deputy cc: C. 16 To:Board of Supervisors From:David Twa, County Administrator Date:March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Presentation honoring Chief Probation Officer Philip Kader on his Retirement March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 196 AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2016/113 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution No. 2016/113 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 197 In the matter of:Resolution No. 2016/113 HONORING PROBATION CHIEF PHILIP KADER UPON HIS RETIREMENT FROM CONTRA COSTA COUNTY WHEREAS, Philip Kader has served the residents of Contra Costa County extraordinarily well for nearly six years as the Chief Probation Officer for the County, serving with dedication and distinction, with these years of service marked by his engaging, inclusive, and energetic leadership and personality; and WHEREAS, Chief Kader has had an exemplary career in the field of Probation, spanning 34 years, having started as a Group Counselor in the Fresno County Probation Department in 1981; and WHEREAS, Chief Kader has been recognized with numerous awards and commendations over the years including “Probation Manager of the Year 2003” by the Chief Probation Officers of California (CPOC); and, WHEREAS, Chief Kader has advanced the field of Probation with his authorship of a multitude of publications and his presentation at a variety of conferences on far-reaching subjects including Restorative Justice; and, WHEREAS, in 2015, Chief Kader performed admirably as the Chair of the Legislative Committee for the CPOC, successfully advocating for AB 231 (Eggman) related to parole and placement at release; and, WHEREAS, Chief Kader played a critical role as Contra Costa County’s first Chair of the Community Corrections Partnership, ushering in AB 109 Public Safety Realignment with a spirit of innovation and a foundation of sound justice principles; and, WHEREAS, Chief Kader has earned the affection of a host of residents and co-workers who are proud and delighted to call him “friend,” and, WHEREAS, the Contra Costa County Probation Office has been most fortunate to have had a person of his capabilities, talents and dedication; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS BY THE BOARD RESOLVED that Philip Kader be recognized for his many contributions to the Contra Costa County Probation Office and receive the Board's best wishes for his future endeavors in retirement. ___________________ CANDACE ANDERSEN Chair, District II Supervisor ______________________________________ JOHN GIOIA MARY N. PIEPHO District I Supervisor District III Supervisor ______________________________________ KAREN MITCHOFF FEDERAL D. GLOVER District IV Supervisor District V Supervisor I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 198 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: March 8, 2016 David J. Twa, By: ____________________________________, Deputy March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 199 PR.1, C.16 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 200 APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 03/08/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Karen Laws 925-313-2228 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: March 8, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stephanie Mello, Deputy cc: C. 12 To:Board of Supervisors From:Julia R. Bueren, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Recognizing Jann Edmunds on her 25 years of service to Contra Costa County March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 201 AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2016/86 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution No. 2016/86 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 202 In the matter of:Resolution No. 2016/86 RECOGNIZING the contributions of Jann Edmunds on her 25 years of service to Contra Costa County. WHEREAS in April of 1990, Jann Edmunds started her career with the Public Works Department as a Clerk Typist-Intermediate Level at the MonTara Bay Community Center; and WHEREAS in October of 1996 Jann was promoted to Clerk-Experienced Level with the Public Works Administrative Services Division; and WHEREAS in July of 1998 she was promoted to Clerk-Senior Level with the Public Works Administrative Services Division; and Whereas in April of 1999 Jann transferred to the Transportation Engineering Division and worked as a Clerk-Senior Level until she transferred to the Real Estate Division; and WHEREAS in 2000 Jann received the Award of Excellence in connection with the Rollingwood Traffic Survey packages for going above and beyond the call of duty, striving for and maintaining the highest of standards, always going the extra mile and doing more than what is expected; and WHEREAS again in 2005 she was given the Award of Excellence for her excellent job in completing the Desk Reference Manual on time and demonstrating “Quality Service” by supporting Public Works Staff over the years; and WHEREAS in 2006 Jann was a recipient of the J. Michael Walford Team of The Year Award for her contribution in the proactive approach to communicating with the communities and developing an outreach program through a newsletter “The Community Informer Road and Transportation Edition” in the Transportation Engineering Division; and WHEREAS in January of 2006, Jann became a Real Property Technical Assistant in the Real Estate Division; and WHEREAS in February of 2008, she promoted to Senior Real Property Technical Assistant in the Real Estate Division; and WHEREAS Jann, as part of the Real Estate team that worked on the four phases of the SR4 East - Somersville to SR160 Project, played an integral part in the success of the teams timely delivery of the parcels necessary for the project; and WHEREAS in 2013 Jann studied for and received a commission as a Notary Public of the State of California to provide services to Contra Costa County and further her contribution to the Real Estate Division; and WHEREAS in May 2014, Jann graduated from Diablo Valley College completing her Associate of Science Degree in Business-Real Estate as a personal accomplishment in order to qualify for advancement into the Real Property Agent Series in the Real Estate Division; and WHEREAS in November of 2014, Jann was promoted to Assistant Real Property Agent in the Real Estate Division; and WHEREAS as a member of the International Right of Way Association, Jann holds the position of membership chair and helps facilitate those of us in the office and externally to stay connected to this professional organization; and WHEREAS throughout all of this time Jann raised four wonderful children and is blessed by two beautiful grandchildren; and WHEREAS she continues to contribute her time, energy and caring spirit to her church and people in her extended family who benefit greatly through her efforts; and WHEREAS Jann is a pleasure to work with and has a great work ethic, she is an all-around wonderful person that was born and raised in Contra Costa County and has made a difference in the Public Works Department by delivering top quality services in each division that she has worked in; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Jann Edmunds be recognized for her 25 year anniversary of dedicated service to Contra Costa County and for the high quality of work performed by her during her career. ___________________ CANDACE ANDERSEN Chair, March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 203 Chair, District II Supervisor ______________________________________ JOHN GIOIA MARY N. PIEPHO District I Supervisor District III Supervisor ______________________________________ KAREN MITCHOFF FEDERAL D. GLOVER District IV Supervisor District V Supervisor I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: March 8, 2016 David J. Twa, By: ____________________________________, Deputy March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 204 C.12 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 205 APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 03/08/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Arlene J. Lozada (925)957-5269 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: March 8, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stephanie Mello, Deputy cc: C. 11 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Recognizing Tracey Walker for Twenty-Five Years of Service March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 206 AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2016/85 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution No. 2016/85 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 207 In the matter of:Resolution No. 2016/85 Recognizing Tracey Walker for her twenty-five years of dedicated service in Contra Costa County. WHEREAS, Tracey Walker began her career with Contra Costa County as a Clerk-Experienced Level with the District Attorney’s Family Support Programs on January 3, 1991. WHEREAS, Tracey, was promoted to the Court Compliance Lead Specialist position on July 2, 2001 and she received another promotion as Collection Enforcement II position on March 18, 2002. WHEREAS, Tracey was transferred to the Health Services Department on January 1, 2011 and began working in the Public Health Division. WHEREAS, at the HIV/AIDS and STD Unit of the Public Health Division, Tracey was given the responsibilities of a Disease Intervention Technician. WHEREAS, Tracey provides HIV and Hepatitis C testing and counseling services and takes pride in providing client-centered education and counseling services to assist high-risk individuals in reducing their risk for HIV, Hepatitis C, and other Sexually Transmitted Diseases (STD). WHEREAS, Tracey uses her strong communication skills to provide key prevention and testing information to the residents of Contra Costa County. WHEREAS, Tracey continues to strive reaching high-risk community members for testing and education services. WHEREAS, Tracey is a professional and demonstrates grace and tact when communicating with clients and co-workers. WHEREAS, Tracey takes pride in her work and continuous to expand her knowledge of HIV/AIDS and STDs in order to be more effective in her assigned duties and responsibilities. WHEREAS, Tracey is an asset to the Education, Prevention and Testing Team and her professionalism serve her well. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors recognize Tracey Walker for the twenty-five years of dedicated service to Contra Costa County. ___________________ CANDACE ANDERSEN Chair, District II Supervisor ______________________________________ JOHN GIOIA MARY N. PIEPHO District I Supervisor District III Supervisor ______________________________________ KAREN MITCHOFF FEDERAL D. GLOVER District IV Supervisor District V Supervisor I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: March 8, 2016 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 208 David J. Twa, By: ____________________________________, Deputy March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 209 PR.3, C.11 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 210 APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 03/08/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Lauri Byers (925) 957-8860 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: March 8, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stephanie Mello, Deputy cc: C. 10 To:Board of Supervisors From:Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Date:March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Resolution recognizing March 2016 as Grand Jury Month in Contra Costa County March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 211 AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2016/62 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution No. 2016/62 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 212 In the matter of:Resolution No. 2016/62 Recognizing March 2016 as Grand Jury Month in Contra Costa County WHEREAS, the Grand Jury system originated in England in the 12 th century, it immigrated to the colonies and later moved westward to California; and WHEREAS, while the primary role of the inquest in early England was as a means of apprehending and punishing criminals, records from the Grand Inquest state, “The inquest was required to present those whose duty was to keep in repair bridges, causeways and highways, for neglect of duty, to inquire into defects of goals and the nature thereof, who ought to repair them and who was responsible for any escapes which had occurred...”; and WHEREAS, starting with what is now its indictment function, the criminal grand jury as we know it today slowly took on its civil, or “watchdog” responsibilities; and WHEREAS, 600 years later, grand juries are still investigating agencies responsible for infrastructure and inquiring into jails; and WHEREAS, the codification of grand jury law in California came about 1872 with the adoption of the Penal Code, where most all grand jury law resides; and WHEREAS, in 1880, the grand jury was “authorized to investigate county governments, required to be impaneled annually to function specifically as watchdogs over county governments”; and WHEREAS, throughout the entire history of California as a state, grand juries have played in important role as the most independent of any body to provide unbiased review of local government operations, seeking more efficient and effective means of utilizing the taxpayer dollar. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County does hereby proclaim March 2016 as "Grand Jury Month" in Contra Costa County and recognize the Contra Costa County Grand Jury for the valuable role it serves in our democratic system of government. ___________________ CANDACE ANDERSEN Chair, District II Supervisor ______________________________________ JOHN GIOIA MARY N. PIEPHO District I Supervisor District III Supervisor ______________________________________ KAREN MITCHOFF FEDERAL D. GLOVER District IV Supervisor District V Supervisor I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: March 8, 2016 David J. Twa, By: ____________________________________, Deputy March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 213 PR.5, C.10 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 214 APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 03/08/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Lauri Byers (925) 957-8860 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: March 8, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stephanie Mello, Deputy cc: C. 14 To:Board of Supervisors From:Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Date:March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Resolution recognizing March 2016 as Prescription Drug Abuse Awareness Month March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 215 AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2016/97 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution No. 2016/62 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 216 In the matter of:Resolution No. 2016/97 Proclaiming March 2016 as Prescription Drug Abuse Awareness Month. Whereas, in 2014, 47,055 drug overdose deaths occurred, more than during any previous year on record; and Whereas, in 2014, opioids, including prescription painkillers and heroin, were involved in 28,647 deaths, or 61% of all drug overdose deaths; and Whereas, nonmedical use of prescription painkillers cost health insurers up to $72.5 billion annually in direct health-care cost; and Whereas, a new California statute makes naloxone, a life saving overdose rescue medication, available from pharmacists without a prescription for community members to have on hand to emergently reverse opioid overdoses in people at risk, Medication Assisted Treatment (MAT) with buprenorphine, methadone and naltrexone is available to assist people in recovering from their opioid substance use disorder; and Whereas, while health care systems and practitioners are adopting guidelines for more cautious prescribing and handling of prescription pain medication, more effort is yet needed to address the epidemic of opioid abuse, heroin addiction and drug overdose in our communities; and Whereas, since September 2010, a total of 5,525,021 pounds of expired and unwanted medication has been removed from circulation and possible diversion by the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) during its National Prescription Drug Take Back Days in cooperation with its state, local, tribal law-enforcement and community partners. The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors supports April 30, 2016 as the next “National Prescription Drug Take Back Day” as declared by the DEA and encourages residents to locate their local collection site and safely dispose of their unwanted, unused prescription drugs on that day; and Whereas, multiple coalitions are working together throughout Contra Costa County to reduce prescription drug abuse and misuse. The Contra Costa MEDS (Medication Education and Disposal Safety) Coalition engages local citizens, law enforcement, education representatives, civic and county leaders, county agencies and community based organizations to raise awareness about potential prescription drug abuse/misuse dangers and to promote safe medication storage and disposal. The East Bay Opioid Safety Coalition focuses on safe prescribing by hospital EDs, urgent care facilities and county and private practice prescribers; and Whereas, families, schools, businesses, faith-based communities, law enforcement, medical professionals, county and local civic leaders and governments, health care practitioners, pharmacists and the general public will demonstrate their commitment to the prevention of prescription drug abuse and misuse by participating in activities intended to highlight and support local prevention efforts during the month of March. Now, Therefore, Be It Resolved that the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County does hereby recognize March, 2016 as Prescription Drug Abuse Awareness Month Prescription Drug Abuse Awareness Month in Contra Costa County and that all community members are encouraged to pledge, “Spread the word…One Pill Can Kill”. ___________________ CANDACE ANDERSEN Chair, District II Supervisor ______________________________________ JOHN GIOIA MARY N. PIEPHO District I Supervisor District III Supervisor ______________________________________ KAREN MITCHOFF FEDERAL D. GLOVER March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 217 District IV Supervisor District V Supervisor I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: March 8, 2016 David J. Twa, By: ____________________________________, Deputy March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 218 PR.4, C.14 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 219 RECOMMENDATION(S): INTRODUCE Ordinance No. 2016-08, establishing an environmental health color-coded placard program for food facilities, WAIVE reading, and FIX March 15, 2016 for adoption. FISCAL IMPACT: The costs to administer the food facility placard program will be covered by existing permit fees. There will be no impact to the county’s general fund, as the Environmental Health Division is fully cost covered by fees. BACKGROUND: According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), there are over 47 million food-borne illness outbreaks every year in the United States. And it is estimated that forty percent of the food-borne illness outbreaks are associated with retail food establishments. Environmental Health is proposing amendments to the county code to implement the Green Yellow Red Food Placarding program. Placarding programs have been shown in other jurisdictions to reduce reportable food-borne illness. The placarding program is part of Environmental Health’s goal to improve food handling practices APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 03/08/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Marilyn Underwood, 692-2521 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: March 8, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: T Scott, M Wilelm, Marilyn Underwood C. 17 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Introduce ordinance establishing an environmental health color-coded placard program for food facilities March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 220 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) and protect public safety in Contra Costa food establishments. The public is very interested in easily accessible information, and this placard system will provide easy access about food safety for that food facility. Food facility operators also have an interest because evidence of safe food handling practices tends to increase customers’ trust and thus is good for business. The proposed placard program will supplement the online and smartphone app posting of food facility inspection results with a posting of the facility’s food safety rating at its entrance. In developing the placard program, Environmental Health considered food rating models that have been implemented, and chose to be consistent with other Bay Area counties in choosing the Green Yellow Red placard system. Currently, Alameda, Santa Clara, San Mateo, Marin, and Sonoma are using the Green Yellow Red placarding system. Environmental Health discussed and received feedback about the program details with 25 food facility operators at two focus groups held in October 2015. Additionally, a letter was sent in early December to 8,000 postal addresses and 2,300 email addresses associated with the 4,000 food facilities in the county reminding them of the proposed plan, inviting them to five meetings held in December, and referring them to the website where a video and other materials describe the placarding program (cchealth.org/placard). The Green Yellow Red Program would visually inform the public of the compliance record of food establishments with a colored placard posted near the entrance to the facility. The colors will mimic a traffic light with green for “go” or “pass”; yellow for “conditional pass”; or red for “stop” or “closed”. The color code placard is intended to: • be easy to understand; • increase public awareness; • lead to increased compliance and food safety; and • reduce food-borne illness factors. The provisions of the ordinance are explained in more detail below: The proposed ordinance adds Article 413-3.18 to the County Ordinance Code to establish a program consisting of color-coded placards and official inspection reports. A placard indicates that Environmental Health has inspected a food facility to determine whether the food facility is in compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws pertaining to the protection of public health. The placard color is based upon inspection results. Green is used to indicate that a food facility has passed an inspection. Yellow is used to indicate that a food facility has conditionally passed an inspection. A yellow placard signifies that two or more violations exist at a food facility, and that the food facility must meet certain conditions to receive a green placard. Red is used to indicate that a food facility has not passed an inspection, its environmental health permit is suspended, and it is closed. When Environmental Health issues a placard, it will also issue an official inspection report. The report is a notice that documents whether the food facility complies with all applicable federal, state, and local laws pertaining to the protection of public health, and describes all actions necessary to correct all violations noted in the report. After a food facility is inspected and issued a placard, it is unlawful to operate a food facility unless the placard is posted so as to be clearly visible to the general public and to patrons entering the food facility. The ordinance makes it illegal to deface, mar, camouflage, hide, or remove a placard. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Ordinance No. 2016-08 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 221 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS PowerPoint Presentation Placard Program March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 222 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 223 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 224 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 225 Marilyn C Underwood, PhD, Director Environmental Health Division March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 226 1. Improve food safety awareness 2. Promote best practices 3. Increase consumer confidence 4. Create highly visible system 5. Provide clear information 6. Align with regional partners 7. Support and promote the local economy and food industry March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 227 Sacramento began this program in 2007 after extensive research of various options Bay Area Environmental Health directors agreed to consistent placard approach for the public Santa Clara, Alameda, Marin, and Sonoma Counties already using Green Yellow Red San Mateo began in 2016 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 228 Started workgroup of staff and managers in March 2015 Workgroup studied various options Vetted with all the food team inspectors Got additional feedback from two focus groups with food facility owners/operators in October March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 229 Inspectors have been discussing the concept with food facility operators since summer 2015 Letter sent to 8,000 postal addresses, 2,300 email addresses in early December Five meetings for food facility operators held in December Placarding reminder on invoices sent in January After, Board approval, a letter announcing implementation with a How to Get a Green poster Website includes videos about placarding program and “How to Get a Green” in English and Spanish and soon in three additional languages Press Release when placarding begins Outreach to consumers is planned for later this year March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 230 a. Same: Inspection process Unannounced routine inspections conducted based on risk category Inspection reports issued Re-inspections conducted to verify corrections Most recent inspection report available upon customer’s request Online and on Smartphone App: List of violation at each inspection for last five years b. Different: Inspection results more readily available to public Onsite: Inspection Report & Colored placard Online and on Smartphone App: Inspection color & list of violation at each inspection for last five years March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 231 Online: https://hsdmobile.cchealth.org/ffinspectionsearch/De fault.aspx FoodInspectorApp March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 232 Included: Restaurants Markets Bars Bakeries Schools Licensed Health Care Facilities Mobile trucks (phase in later in 2016) Not included: Special events and festivals Farmers Markets Farm Stands Vending Machines March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 233 GREEN: PASS – No more than one major violation (should be corrected or mitigated at inspection) CONDITIONAL PASS – Two or more major violations (should be corrected or mitigated at inspection) CLOSURE – One or more imminent health hazards, not corrected on site March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 234 Closed for a major that can not be corrected on-site, also called an imminent health hazard No difference than now, really, except we have a new sign Reasons for red placard: Employee/s diagnosed and working in a facility with a communicable disease No potable water available onsite Lack of hot water in hand wash, food prep or utensil washing sinks Vermin, rodent or insect infestations Major damage due to fire Lack of electricity or power Sewage backup in facility Refrigeration units not working properly March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 235 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 236 A major violation will result if the following situations occur: The Person in Charge does not report that an employee diagnosed with one of the reportable illnesses to EH The Person in Charge does not report to EH that there are two or more employees with symptoms of nausea, vomiting and diarrhea The Person in Charge when hearing about a reportable disease or cut/wound does not exclude or restrict that employee Reportable Illnesses Salmonellosis Shigellosis Amebiasis Hepatitis A Norovirus E. Coli infection Typhoid fever March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 237 A major violation will result if the following situations occur: Bad handwashing behavior: Hands are not washed properly and thoroughly Hands are not washed after using the restroom Hands are not washed before food prep Hands are not washed after eating, drinking or tobacco use Hands are not washed after handling raw foods and before handling ready to eat foods Hands are not washed after caring for an animal Hands are not washed before donning gloves Hands and fingernails are dirty while handling food Improper glove usage March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 238 A major violation will result if the following situations occur: Potentially hazardous food at temperatures between 50˚F to 124˚F without any other intervention. Food that has been time marked and has exceeded the time marked. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 239 A major violation will result if the following situations occur: Potentially hazardous food being improperly cooled to 41°F with more than 6 hours elapsed since food reached 135°F. Failure to cool from 135°F to 70°F in two hours or less. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 240 A major violation will result if the following situations occur: Potentially hazardous food not cooked as required with greater than 5° difference between required cook temperature and actual cook temperature. Potentially hazardous food not rapidly reheated to 165°F prior to hot holding. Potentially hazardous food must be hot held at a temperature 135°F or higher. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 241 A major violation will result if the following situations occur: Food is found to be adulterated. Contamination of food-contact surfaces that could result in food contamination o type of raw food of animal origin o changing from raw foods to working with ready-to-eat foods Ice that has been used for cooling the exterior surfaces of food such as melon or fish, canned beverages, or equipment is used as food. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 242 A major violation will result if the following situations occur: Improper sanitization of food contact surfaces (no sanitizer residual) Wiping cloth bucket not present or with improper sanitizer solution Warewashingsink or warewashing machine with improper sanitizer levels Failure to sanitize food contact surfaces between each use March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 243 A major violation will result if the following situations occur: Food or ice is not from an approved food source. Liquid, frozen, and dry eggs and egg products are not pasteurized. Missing or incomplete shellfish certification tags or improper wet storage of shellfish (includes commingling of shellfish). Shell stock tags are not attached to the container they are received in until empty, or tags/labels are not held for 90 calendar days from the date the lot is emptied March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 244 VIOLATION 10: Proper cooking time & temperatures Sections: 114004, 114008, 114010 Major violations include: Potentially hazardous food not cooked as required with greater than 5° difference between required cook temperature and actual cook temperature. For example: Chicken is cooked to 159°F. Minor violations include: Less than or equal to 5°F difference between required cook temperature and actual cook temperature. For example: Chicken is cooked to 162°F. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 245 Within 10 business days, a mandatory re-placard inspection (when yellow occurred for a routine) Re-placard inspection of only critical risk factors, including the ones that resulted in the yellow. Limit to one re-placard per routine inspection 1st re-placard or re-inspection of the year is not chargeable March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 246 1st or when not consecutive yellow: inspector provides education as part of routine inspection. Recommends that staff watch DVD/video, “How to Get a Green” 2nd consecutive: all kitchen staff required to attend Food Safety Refresher class. This will be offered regularly at EH offices or can occur at the facility. A fee applies 3rd consecutive yellow: Compliance Conference in the office with Food Team Supervisor. No fee applies. 4th consecutive yellow: Administrative Hearing. A fee applies March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 247 1. To recognize food operators’ commitment to food safety in establishing and maintaining public health interventions 2. No Major violations over a two year period of time 3. A Gold Star would be added to the Green placard And it would be recognized on our website and FoodInspectorapp March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 248 March 8, 2016- Introduce ordinance March 15, 2016- Approve ordinance April 15, 2016- Initiate placarding program March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 249 RECOMMENDATION(S): ACCEPT the Resignation of Barbara Ward from the In-Home Supportive Services Public Authority Advisory Committee, Consumer of Any Age, Seat 4, and DIRECT the Clerk of the Board to post the vacancy as recommended by the Employment and Human Services Department Director. FISCAL IMPACT: None BACKGROUND: The Board of Supervisors established the In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) Public Authority Advisory committee in March 1998. Its purpose is to serve in an advisory capacity to the Public Authority Governing Board, Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors, Public Authority staff and administrators of In-Home Supportive Services. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: IHSS Public Authority Advisory Committee will be unable to fill Consumer Any Age, Seat 4. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: Not applicable. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 03/08/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Elaine Burres, 313-1717 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: March 8, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: C. 18 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director Date:March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Accept the Resignation of Barbara Ward from the In-Home Supportive Services Public Authority and DECLARE the Vacancy. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 250 AGENDA ATTACHMENTS MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Vacancy Notice March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 251 March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes252 RECOMMENDATION(S): ACCEPT the resignation of Sharon Thygessen, DECLARE a vacancy in the Appointed Seat 2 on the El Sobrante Municipal Advisory Council, and DIRECT the Clerk of the Board to post the vacancy, as recommended by Supervisor Gioia. FISCAL IMPACT: None BACKGROUND: The El Sobrante Municipal Advisory Council advises the Board of Supervisors on: 1) Services which are or may be provided to unincorporated El Sobrante by the County or other local governmental agencies. Such services include, but are not limited to, public health, safety, welfare, public works, and planning, 2) the feasibility of organizing the existing special districts serving unincorporated El Sobrante in order to more efficiently provide public services such as, but not limited to, water, sewer, fire, and parks and recreation, 3) representing unincorporated El Sobrante before the Local Agency Formation Commission on proposed boundary changes affecting the community, 4) representing unincorporated El Sobrante before the County Planning Commission(s) and the Zoning Administrator on land use and other planning matters affecting the community. In this regard, the Council shall cooperate with any other planning advisory bodies in unincorporated El Sobrante in order to avoid duplication and delay in the planning process, 5) Provide input and reports to the Board of Supervisors, County staff, or any other County hearing body on issues of concern to unincorporated El Sobrante, and 6) representing unincorporated El Sobrante before other public entities and agencies. It is understood that the Board of Supervisors is the final decision making authority with APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 03/08/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: James Lyons, 510-231-8692 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: March 8, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: C. 19 To:Board of Supervisors From:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Date:March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:ACCEPT the resignation of Sharon Thygessen from the El Sobrante Municipal Advisory Council March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 253 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) respect to issues concerning unincorporated El Sobrante. Mrs. Thygessen has been serving the El Sobrante Municipal Advisory Council successfully for many years and is now resigning for personal reasons. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Vacancy Notice March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 254 March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes255 RECOMMENDATION(S): ACCEPT resignation of Mike Smith, DECLARE vacant Seat B2 – American Heart Association, on the Emergency Medical Care Committee (EMCC) and DIRECT the Clerk of the Board to post the vacancy as recommended by the Health Services Director. FISCAL IMPACT: No General Fund impact. BACKGROUND: Resignation of Seat B2 appointee Mick Smith, submitted to the EMCC on February 23, 2016. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Failure to declare the vacancy will delay making a new appointment to the seat. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: Not applicable. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 03/08/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Patricia Frost, 646-4690 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: March 8, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: Tasha Scott, M Wilhelm, Leticia Andreas C. 20 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Declare Emergency Medical Care Committee (EMCC) Vacant Seats March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 256 AGENDA ATTACHMENTS MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Vacancy Notice March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 257 March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes258 RECOMMENDATION(S): ACCEPT resignation of Uche Uwahemu, DECLARE a vacancy in the Economic Opportunity Council Private/Non-Profit Sector Seat No.5, and DIRECT the Clerk of the Board to post the vacancy, as recommended by the Employment & Human Services Director. FISCAL IMPACT: None BACKGROUND: Mr. Uwahemu was appointed to Private/Non-profit Sector Seat No.5 on February 5, 2013 and re-appointed July 7, 2015 with a term end date of June 30, 2019. He submitted his resignation from this seat effective February 11, 2016. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If not approved, the Economic Opportunity will not be able to fill the vacancy. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: None APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 03/08/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: CSB (925) 681-6308 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: March 8, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: Nancy Sparks, Christina Reich, Cassandra Youngblood C. 23 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director Date:March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:DECLARE Vacant Private/Non-Profit Sector Seat No. 5 on the Economic Opportunity Council March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 259 AGENDA ATTACHMENTS MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Vacancy Notice March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 260 March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes261 RECOMMENDATION(S): ↵ 1. APPROVE Hazardous Materials Commission nominations to appoint the following individuals to the Commission to terms ending on December 31, 2019: Action Nominee Seat Nominated By Reappoint Frank Gordon General Public Commission Reappoint Tim Bancroft General Public Alternate Commission Reassign Usha Vedagiri Environmental Organizations #2 Commission Reappoint Jim Payne Labor #2 Central Labor Council Reappoint Tracy Scott Labor #2 Alternate Central Labor Council↵ 2. DECLARE vacant the Environmental Organizations #3 Alternate seat held by Usha Vedagiri due to her reassignment to a regular seat and DIRECT the Clerk of the Board to post the vacancy. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 03/08/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: March 8, 2016 , County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: C. 22 To:Board of Supervisors From:INTERNAL OPERATIONS COMMITTEE Date:March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:RECOMMENDATIONS FOR APPOINTMENTS TO THE HAZARDOUS MATERIALS COMMISSION March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 262 BACKGROUND: The Hazardous Materials Commission was established in 1986 to advise the Board, County Staff and the mayor's council members, and staffs of the cities within the County, on issues related to the development, approval and administration of the County Hazardous Waste Management Plan. Specifically, the Board charged the Commission with drafting a Hazardous Materials Storage and Transportation Plan and Ordinance, coordinating the implementation of the Hazardous Materials Release Response Plan and inventory program, and to analyze and develop recommendations regarding hazards materials issues with consideration to broad public input, and report back to the Board on Board referrals. The term for numerous seats on the Hazardous Materials Commission expired on December 31, 2015, creating vacancies. The Commission recruited and interviewed candidates for the vacant seats and makes nominations to the IOC to fill the seats, as explained in the attached transmittal letter. Recruitment materials and candidate applications are attached for information. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Should the Board elect not to approve the recommendations, then the seats will remain vacant and the public, environmental, and labor interested will be underrepresented on the Commission. ATTACHMENTS Letter of Transmittal_HazMat Commission Candidate Application_HMC_Timothy Bancroft Candidate Application_HMC_Charles Davidson Candidate Application_HMC_Frank Gordon Candidate Application_HMC_James Payne Candidate Application_HMC_Tracy Scott Candidate Application_HMC_Usha Vedagiri USW Nomination Letter March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 263 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 264 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 265 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 266 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 267 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 268 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 269 March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes270 March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes271 March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes272 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 273 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 274 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 275 March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes276 March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes277 March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes278 March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes279 March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes280 March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes281 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 282 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 283 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 284 RECOMMENDATION(S): Appoint the following individuals to the Integrated Pest Management Advisory Committee: Name Seat Term Expiration Susan Captain, Moraga At Large #1 12/31/19 James Donnelly, Danville At Large #3 12/31/18 Wayne Lanier, PhD, Walnut Creek Public Member Alternate 12/31/18 BACKGROUND: The Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Advisory Committee was established by the Board of Supervisors in November 2009 to advise the Board regarding the protection and enhancement of public health, County resources, and the environment related to pest control methods employed by County departments. The IPM Committee has eight voting members as follows: two ex-officio members (Health Services Department and County/Unincorporated County Storm Water Program) and six public members (one Public and Environmental Health Advisory Board representative, one County Fish and Wildlife Committee representative, one Environmental Organizations representative, and three At Large appointees); plus one Public Member Alternate seat. Terms of office for the At APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 03/08/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Julie DiMaggio Enea (925) 335-1077 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: March 8, 2016 , County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: C. 21 To:Board of Supervisors From:INTERNAL OPERATIONS COMMITTEE Date:March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:RECOMMENDATIONS FOR APPOINTMENTS TO THE INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 285 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) > Large and Alternate seats reviewed by the Internal Operations Committee have recently been extended from two to four years at the direction of the IOC. On December 31, 2015, the terms of the At Large #1 and #3, and the Public Member Alternate seats expired. On February 29, the IOC conducted a group interview of seven candidates and is recommending appointment of three candidates. Attached is a summary of the IPM Roster effective 1/5/16 and the applications of all candidates who were considered by the IOC. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Should the Board elect not to approve the appointments, then the general public will not be adequately represented on the IPM Advisory Committee. ATTACHMENTS 1/5/16 IPM Roster Candidate Application_IPM_Larry Brunink Candidate Application_IPM_Susan Captain Candidate Application_IPM_Kelly Davidson Candidate Application_IPM_James Donnelly Candidate Application_IPM_Nati Flores Candidate Application_IPM_Wayne Lanier Candidate Application_IPM_Justin B. Sinclaire March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 286 ATTACHMENT A INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE ROSTER (As of January 5, 2016) Seat Title Appointee Name Work Address or Affiliation BACKGROUND Term Expiration Voting? Agriculture Commissioner Chad Godoy 2366 Stanwell Circle, Concord, CA 94520 Agriculture, pesticide regulation, IPM None NO General Services Deputy Director or Designee Jerry Casey 2467 Waterbird Way Martinez, CA 94553 Facilities management None NO Public Works Deputy Director or Designee Allison Knapp 255 Glacier Dr., Martinez, CA 94553 Flood control engineer None NO County Pest Management Contractor Carlos Agurto Pestec IPM Provider, 1804 Sanger Peak Ct., Antioch, CA 94531 Structural IPM, entomology, vertebrate pest management December 31, 2017 NO Health Services Department Representative Michael Kent 597 Center, Ste 100, Martinez, CA 94553 Hazardous materials, IPM, etc. None YES County/Unincorporated County Storm Water Program Representative Cece Sellgren 255 Glacier Dr. Martinez, CA 94553 Storm Water management, clean water issues, grazing None YES Public and Environmental Health Advisory Board Representative Vacant (was Marj Leeds) YES Public Member – Fish and Wildlife Committee Representative Susan Heckly Fish and Wildlife Committee Wildlife, IPM, worked in the Lindsay Wildlife Museum December 31, 2019 YES Public Member 1 – Type 2 At Large Vacant December 31, 2019 YES Public Member 2 – Type 2 At Large Andrew Sutherland U.C. Cooperative Extension Urban IPM Advisor UC Cooperative Extension Urban IPM specialist for the Bay Area, entomologist, experience in plant nurseries December 31, 2019 YES Public Member 3 – Type 2 At Large Vacant December 31, 2018 YES Environmental Organization – Type 3 At Large Seat Jim Cartan Save Mt. Diablo, Conservation Assoc. Invasive species management, invasive weed management, natural area stewardship, habitat restoration, worked for the National Park Service at the Golden Gate National Recreation Area December 31, 2018 YES Public Member Alternate Vacant December 31, 2018 Only if a public at-large member/PEH AB rep/F&W rep is absent March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 287 March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes288 March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes289 March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes290 March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes291 March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes292 March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes293 March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes294 March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes295 March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes296 March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes297 March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes298 March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes299 March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes300 March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes301 March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes302 March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes303 March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes304 March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes305 March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes306 March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes307 March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes308 March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes309 March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes310 March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes311 March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes312 March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes313 March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes314 March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes315 March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes316 March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes317 March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes318 March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes319 RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT a position of support on AB 1592 (Bonilla) Autonomous Vehicles: Pilot Project, a bill that authorizes the Contra Costa Transportation Authority to conduct a pilot project for the testing of autonomous vehicles not equipped with a steering wheel, brake pedal, accelerator, or an operator, if the testing is conducted only at specified locations and the vehicle operates at specified speeds. AUTHORIZE the Chair of the Board of Supervisors to sign a letter communicating the Board's position,.as recommended by the Transportation, Water, and Infrastructure Committee. FISCAL IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND: This measure would authorize the Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA) to conduct a pilot project for the testing of autonomous vehicles if the testing is conducted only at (1) an unnamed business park designated by CCTA and, (2) at the "GoMentum Station" located at the Concord Naval Weapons Station (Project Fact Sheet attached). The bill further requires that the autonomous vehicle may only operate at speeds of less than 35 miles per hour. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 03/08/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: John Cunningham (925)674-7833 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: March 8, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stephanie Mello, Deputy cc: C. 24 To:Board of Supervisors From:TRANSPORTATION, WATER & INFRASTRUCTURE COMMITTEE Date:March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Support Position on AB 1592 (Bonilla) Autonomous Vehicles: Pilot Project March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 320 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) > Current law authorizes autonomous cars to operate on public roads for testing purposes, but under limiting conditions that include: (1) a driver is seated in the driver’s seat and must be capable of taking control of the vehicle, (2) the vehicle must have a steering wheel, and (3) the vehicle has brake pedals and an accelerator that can be controlled by the vehicle operator. Because the vehicles that the Authority would like to test are not so equipped, this bill is necessary to permit operation on portions of public roads at the facilities enumerated in the bill. A draft letter of support for the Chair's signature is attached to this report. As of the submission of this report, the following organizations support/oppose the subject bill: Support Contra Costa Transportation Authority (Sponsor) Allstate Bay Area Council City of San Ramon City of Walnut Creek EasyMile Stantec Sunset Development Company Telegra, Inc. Oppose None CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The Board of Supervisors would forgo an opportunity to support CCTA's legislative agenda. ATTACHMENTS GoMentum Station Fact Sheet AB1592 Bonilla - Autonomous Vehicles AB 1592 Fact Sheet DRAFT BOS Support Letter to AM Bonilla for AB1592 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 321 CCTA Connected Vehicles (CV) Autonomous Vehicles (AV) Program – GoMentum Station GoMentum Station in Concord, California is where CCTA leads and facilitates a collaborative partnership amongst multiple Automobile Manufacturers; OEMs and Tier-1 suppliers; communications companies; technology companies; researchers and academia; public agencies and other partners that converge in research, development, testing, validation and commercialization of Connected Vehicle (CV) applications and Autonomous Vehicles (AV) technologies to define the next generation of transportation network infrastructure. This 5000 –acre former Navy Weapons Station is one of the largest test facilities in the world and will be the center of CV/AV activities. The CV Program is a major initiative of the United States Department of Transportation (USDOT). The USDOT CV program is comprised of Vehicles to Vehicles (V2V), Vehicles to Infrastructure (V2I) and Vehicles to Devices (V2D) elements, and is designed to improve safety, mobility, and reduce energy use and emissions through technological solutions. Through its early investments and partnerships, CCTA and its GoMentum Station are well-positioned for the expected USDOT funding opportunities in early 2015 and 2016. Au tonomous Vehicles (AV) sense their surroundings through radar, lidar (image sensing), global positioning system (GPS) and computer vision. Recently we have seen acceleration of AV technologies in unprecedented fashion by building working prototype of AV’s. Companies such as Honda, Mercedes Benz, Bosch, Nissan, Toyota, Audi, Volvo, and Google are some of the trailblazers in the AV field. Now in partnership with CCTA, several automobile manufacturers will test and validate their CV/AV technologies at the GoMentum Station Testbed in Contra Costa county to advance their research and accelerate commercialization. CCTA’s CV/AV Program Vision CCTA has consistently taken a leadership role in transportation and believes the future economic vitality of Contra Cost a depends on the ability to provide safe, reliable, and efficient mobility through the transportation network. It is clear that in the 21st century we will not be able to build our way out of congestion. We must provide an efficient transportation system by utilizing emerging technologies such as CV/AV and leverage partnerships with the public and private sectors to advance these programs. CCTA’s strategy is centered on: 1. Enhancing Contra Costa’s regional economic competitiveness and job growth 2. Partnering with our communities to improve safety, mobility and the environment 3. Creating a world-class CV/AV Testbed with active industry and government participation Critical to the success of such an ambitious program is an effective and innovative partnering strategy. This spans both public and private sector partners and must be developed in careful consideration of various interests and needs. CCTA is seizing on an historic opportunity to create a unique partnership model without precedence that is:  Comprehensive and inclusive of all modes of surface transportation (multi-modalism).  Inclusive of both private sector and public sector initiatives and investments to drive economic growth and innovation.  Predicated on strategic partnerships with multiple automobile manufacturers and other top tier suppliers and organizations, with focus on innovation.  Capitalizes on the Bay Area technology base and culture of creativity. We are capturing a prominent spot in the CV/AV arena within the next 5-10 years by building America’s largest and most comprehensive CV/AV Testbed in Contra Costa County (with affiliated multi-modal pilot projects), and will incubate the next generation of advanced transportation systems for decades to come. For additional Information Contact: Jack Hall,PE ITS/CV Program Manager (925) 256.4700 jhall@ccta.net GoMentum Station I-680 HOT Lanes I-80 ICM ATM SR-4 ICM Concord –Walnut Creek DSRC ATSS RFID, Sensors Bike to TransitRFID, Sensors Ped to Vehicle Self-Parking Car Transit Tracking Truck Tracking CVO DSS In- Vehicle Heads Up Display ATIS V2I V2V CVO & Transit March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 322 california legislature—2015–16 regular session ASSEMBLY BILL No. 1592 Introduced by Assembly Member Bonilla January 6, 2016 An act to add Section 38755 to the Vehicle Code, relating to autonomous vehicles. legislative counsel’s digest AB 1592, as introduced, Bonilla. Autonomous vehicles: pilot project. Existing law permits the operation of an autonomous vehicle on public roads for testing purposes if, among other requirements, the driver is seated in the driver’s seat and is capable of taking immediate manual control of the vehicle in the event of an autonomous technology failure or other emergency. This bill would, notwithstanding the above provision, authorize the Contra Costa Transportation Authority to conduct a pilot project for the testing of autonomous vehicles that are not equipped with a steering wheel, a brake pedal, an accelerator, or an operator inside the vehicle, if the testing is conducted only at specified locations and the autonomous vehicle operates at speeds of less than 35 miles per hour. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the Contra Costa Transportation Authority. Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: no. State-mandated local program: no. 99 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 323 The people of the State of California do enact as follows: line 1 SECTION 1. Section 38755 is added to the Vehicle Code, to line 2 read: line 3 38755. Notwithstanding Section 38750, the Contra Costa line 4 Transportation Authority is authorized to conduct a pilot project line 5 for the testing of autonomous vehicles that are not equipped with line 6 a steering wheel, a brake pedal, an accelerator, or an operator inside line 7 the vehicle, provided the following requirements are met: line 8 (a)  The testing shall be conducted only at a privately owned line 9 business office park designated by the authority, inclusive of public line 10 roads within the designated office park, and at the GoMentum line 11 Station at the Concord Naval Weapons Station. line 12 (b)  The autonomous vehicle shall operate at speeds of less than line 13 35 miles per hour. line 14 SEC. 2. The Legislature finds and declares that a special law line 15 is necessary and that a general law cannot be made applicable line 16 within the meaning of Section 16 of Article IV of the California line 17 Constitution. Because of the need to limit the scope of testing of line 18 new autonomous vehicle technology it is necessary to limit line 19 authorization for the establishment of a pilot project to the Contra line 20 Costa Transportation Authority. O 99 — 2 —AB 1592 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 324 AB 1592: Advancing the Testing of Autonomous Vehicles Contact: Ryan Morimune or Luis Quinonez, Office of Assemblywoman Susan A. Bonilla, (916) 319-2014, ryan.morimune@asm.ca.gov or luis.quinonez@asm.ca.gov Summary: AB 1592 will authorize the Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA) to conduct a pilot project for the testing of electric, low-speed, multi-passenger autonomous vehicles. Background: With the advent of autonomous vehicles and the rapid development of autonomous technologies and connected vehicle applications, California is on the cusp of transforming everyday transportation, increasing road safety and improving mobility. The Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA) is a public agency which is spearheading the testing and development of autonomous and connected vehicle technologies in Northern California. As a regional leader in transportation, CCTA developed GoMentum Station at the 5,000 acre, former United States Navy weapons station in Concord, CA, where the convergence of automobile manufacturers, communications companies, technology companies, researchers and public agencies are testing next generation transportation technologies that will redefine mobility. Need for legislation: In 2012, Senate Bill 1298 was signed into law, authorizing the operatation of autonomous vehicles on public roads for testing purposes. This bill required the California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) to adopt regulations for the operation of autonomous vehicles on public roads, including any testing, equipment, performance, and insurance standards no later than January 1, 2015. In September 2014, DMV enacted regulations setting forth the requirments for testing autonomous vehicles, but they are still drafting the final set of regulations for the full deployment of autonomous vehicles for public operation. CCTA currently hosts autonomous vehicle testing at GoMentum Station because it is a private, secure facility located within the Concord Naval Weapons Station. CCTA is planning to expand their testing program, but current law does not authorize the operation of autonomous vehicles without a steering wheel, brake pedal, accelerator, and operator on public roads, even if they intersect private property. AB 1592 authorizes CCTA to continue to cultivate safe, convenient, innovative, complementary and alternative modes of transportation at GoMentum Station and a private business park within Contra Costa County, designated by CCTA. For California to remain on the cutting edge of transportation technology and a potential hotbed for investment, development, and new jobs, it is imperative that the State continues to support the growth of testing programs that advance autonomous vehicle technology. This bill: Specifically, this bill:  Authorizes CCTA to conduct a pilot project for the testing of autonomous vehicles not equipped with a steering wheel, brake pedal, accelerator or operator.  The autonomous vehicle shall operate at speeds less than 35 miles per hour.  Testing shall be conducted only at GoMentum Station at the former Concord Naval Weapons Station and a privately owned business park designated by CCTA, including any public roads intersecting the designated property. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 325 Support:  Contra Costa Transportation Authority (Sponsor) Contact: Ryan Morimune Office of Assemblywoman Susan A. Bonilla 916-319-2014 ryan.morimune@asm.ca.gov Luis Quinonez Office of Assemblywoman Susan A. Bonilla 916-319-2014 luis.quinonez@asm.ca.gov March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 326 The Board of Supervisors County Administration Building 651 Pine Street, Room 106 Martinez, California 94553-1293 John Gioia, 1st District Candace Andersen, 2nd District Mary N. Piepho, 3rd District Karen Mitchoff, 4th District Federal D. Glover, 5th District March 8, 2016    Honorable Susan A. Bonilla   California State Assembly, 14th District  State Capitol, Room 4140  Sacramento, CA 95814‐4900    Re:  AB 1592 (Bonilla) Autonomous Vehicle Pilot Project – SUPPORT     Dear Assemblywoman Bonilla:    On behalf of the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors, I am writing to express our support for your bill AB 1592  which would authorize the Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA) to conduct a pilot project for the testing of  shared autonomous vehicles not equipped with a steering wheel, brake pedal, or operator.      California is on the cusp of transforming everyday transportation, increasing road safety, improving traffic congestion  and reducing our greenhouse gas emissions.  However, it is critical that the state is committed to supporting the growth  of advanced technologies to ensure that California remains a global leader in innovation and becomes a potential  hotbed for investment, development and job creation.       In 2012, Senate Bill 1298 was signed into law, authorizing the operation of autonomous vehicles on public roads for  testing purposes and requiring the California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) to adopt regulations by January  2015.  While DMV is still drafting the final regulations for the full deployment of autonomous vehicles on public roads, it  is imperative that research, development and testing of such rapidly advancing technologies are not stalled.           AB 1592 supports safe testing of low‐speed, multi‐passenger, electric autonomous vehicles at GoMentum Station – the  largest secure transportation technology proving grounds in the nation, and a private business park in Contra Costa  County, to be designated by CCTA.     Contra Costa County is proud to support your bill which will help cultivate safe, innovative, convenient, and  complementary modes of transportation in our community.  I would like to thank you for your leadership on this  important policy matter and if you have any questions, please contact John Kopchik, Director of Conservation and  Development at 925‐674‐7819 or john.kopchik@dcd.cccounty.us.     Sincerely,        Candace Andersen, Chair  Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors    Copy  Dave Hudson, Chair – Contra Costa Transportation Authority  David Twa Clerk of the Board and County Administrator (925) 335-1900 Contra Costa County March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 327 RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 21834 to increase the hours of Nutrition Assistant (1K7B) position #8802 from 12/40 to 24/40 at salary level QT5-1086 ($3362 - $3965); Therapist Aide (V5WA) position #9668 from 20/40 to 40/40 at salary level QB5-1179 ($3262 - $3965); two (2) Physical Therapist II (V5VF) position #8245 from 20/40 to 24/40, and position #8991 from 36/40 to 40/40 at salary level QT5-1746 ($6,271 - $7622); Senior Radiological Technician (V8VA) position #10040 from 20/40/ to 40/40 at salary level ($6215 - $7555) in the Health Services Department. (Represented) FISCAL IMPACT: Upon Approval, there is an annual cost of approximately $532,708.79, which includes pension cost of $112,788.28. The entire cost is offset from Enterprise Fund I revenue. BACKGROUND: The Health Services APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 03/08/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jacqueline Kidd, 925-957-5240 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: March 8, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: C. 25 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Date:March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Increase the hours of five positions in the Health Services Department March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 328 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Department is requesting to increase the hours of five (5) positions, as per the Memorandum of Understanding with the Public Employees Union, Local One. The positions are: Nutrition Assistant position #8802 from 12/40 24/40; Therapy Aide, position #9668 from 20/40 to 40/40; two Physical Therapist II, position #8245 from 20/40 to 40/40 and position #8991 from 36/40 to 40/40; and Senior Radiological Technician, position #10040 from 20/40 to 40/40 in the Health Services Department. The incumbents have been working the increased hours for the past six months and these additional hours are certified by their respective Department Manager's as being operationally necessary to continue the mandated functions of the department, to ensure patient care at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center and its Health Centers. There is an annual cost of $532,708.79, which is offset from Hospital Enterprise Fund I revenue. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this action is not approved, these positions located in the Contra Costa Regional Medical Center will not have adequate staffing to fulfill the mandated functions of the department. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: N/A AGENDA ATTACHMENTS P-300 #21834 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed P300 21834 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 329 POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST NO. 21834 DATE 2/23/2016 Department No./ Department Health Services Budget Unit No. 0540 Org No. Vary Agency No. A18 Action Requested: Increase hours for one Nutrition Assistant (1K7B) #8802 from 12/40 to 24/40; one Therapist Aide (V5WA) #9668 from 20/40 to 40/40; two (2) Physical Therapist II (V5VF); #8245 from 20/40 to 24/40 and #8991 from 36/40 to 40/40; and one Senior Radiological Technician (V8VA) #10040 from 24/40 to 40/40 in the Health Services Department. Proposed Effective Date: 3/16/2016 Classification Questionnaire attached: Yes No / Cost is within Department’s budget: Yes No Total One-Time Costs (non-salary) associated with request: $0.00 Estimated total cost adjustment (salary / benefits / one time): Total annual cost $532,708.79 Net County Cost $0.00 Total this FY $221,961.99 N.C.C. this FY $0.00 SOURCE OF FUNDING TO OFFSET ADJUSTMENT Enterprise Fund I21834 Department must initiate necessary adjustment and submit to CAO. Use additional sheet for further explanations or comments. Jacqueline Kidd ______________________________________ (for) Department Head REVIEWED BY CAO AND RELEASED TO HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT Dorothy Sansoe 2/29/2016 ___________________________________ ________________ Deputy County Administrator Date HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS DATE Amend Resolution 71/17 establishing positions and resolutions allocating classes to the Basic / Exempt salary schedule. Effective: Day following Board Action. 3/16/2016(Date) ___________________________________ ________________ (for) Director of Human Resources Date COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION: DATE 2/29/2016 Approve Recommendation of Director of Human Res ources Disapprove Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Dorothy Sansoe Other: _Approve as requested by Department_____________________ ___________________________________ (for) County Administrator BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION: David J. Twa, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment is APPROVED DISAPPROVED and County Administrator DATE BY APPROVAL OF THIS ADJUSTMENT CONSTITUTES A PERSONNEL / SALARY RESOLUTION AMENDMENT POSITION ADJUSTMENT ACTION TO BE COMPLETED BY HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT FOLLOWING BOARD ACTION Adjust class(es) / position(s) as follows: P300 (M347) Rev 3/15/01 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 330 March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes331 RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 21835 to reclassify one (1) Account Clerk Advanced Level (JDTD) (represented) position #166 at salary plan and grade 3RX 1133 ($3,408-$4,353) and its incumbent to Accounting Technician (JD7A) (represented) at salary plan and grade 3RX 1236 ($3,774-$4,820) in the Office of the Auditor-Controller. FISCAL IMPACT: This action will result in an annual cost of $5,900 of which $1,453 is due to pension costs. BACKGROUND: The incumbent is assigned to the General Accounting division of the Office of the Auditor-Controller and has been performing duties that are typically assigned to an Accounting Technician. The incumbent completed a Position Description Questionnaire (PDQ) that the Human Resources department reviewed and confirmed. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this action is not approved, the assigned duties will have to be reassigned alternate staff with full work-loads. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 03/08/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Elizabeth Verigin (925) 646-2185 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: March 8, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: Tanya Williams, James Hicks, Elizabeth Verigin C. 26 To:Board of Supervisors From:Robert Campbell, Auditor-Controller Date:March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Reclassify one Account Clerk Advanced Level position and its incumbent to Accounting Technician March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 332 AGENDA ATTACHMENTS AIR 24827 P300 21835 Reclassify MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed P300 24827 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 333 POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST NO. 21835 DATE 2/23/2016 Department No./ Department Auditor-Controller Budget Unit No. 0010 Org No. 1019 Agency No. 10 Action Requested: Reclassify without Examination Pos. 166 and incumbent from Account Clerk Advance Level (JDTB) to Accounting Technician (JD7A). Proposed Effective Date: 3/1/2016 Classification Questionnaire attached: Yes No / Cost is within Department’s budget: Yes No Total One-Time Costs (non-salary) associated with request: $0.00 Estimated total cost adjustment (salary / benefits / one time): Total annual cost ($5,900.00) Net County Cost ($5,900.00) Total this FY $1,500.00 N.C.C. this FY $1,500.00 SOURCE OF FUNDING TO OFFSET ADJUSTMENT Within allocated budget. Department must initiate necessary adjustment and submit to CAO. Use additional sheet for further explanations or comments. Robert Campbell ______________________________________ (for) Department Head REVIEWED BY CAO AND RELEASED TO HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT Lisa Driscoll 2/29/16 ___________________________________ ________________ Deputy County Administrator Date HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS DATE Reclassify one (1) Account Clerk Advanced Level (JDTD) (represented) position #166 at salary plan and grade 3RX 1133 ($3408-$4353) and its incumbent to Accounting Technician (JD7A) (represented) at salary plan and grade 3RX 1236 ($3774- $4820) in the Office of the Auditor-Controller. Amend Resolution 71/17 establishing positions and resolutions allocating classes to the Basic / Exempt salary schedule. Effective: Day following Board Action. 3/1/2016(Date) Tanya Williams 2/29/2016 ___________________________________ ________________ (for) Director of Human Resources Date COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION: DATE Approve Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Disapprove Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Other: ____________________________________________ ___________________________________ (for) County Administrator BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION: David J. Twa, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment is APPROVED DISAPPROVED and County Administrator DATE BY APPROVAL OF THIS ADJUSTMENT CONSTITUTES A PERSONNEL / SALARY RESOLUTION AMENDMENT POSITION ADJUSTMENT ACTION TO BE COMPLETED BY HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT FOLLOWING BOARD ACTION Adjust class(es) / position(s) as follows: P300 (M347) Rev 3/15/01 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 334 REQUEST FOR PROJECT POSITIONS Department Date 3/2/2016 No. xxxxxx 1. Project Positions Requested: 2. Explain Specific Duties of Position(s) 3. Name / Purpose of Project and Funding Source (do not use acronyms i.e. SB40 Project or SDSS Funds) 4. Duration of the Project: Start Date End Date Is funding for a specified period of time (i.e. 2 years) or on a year-to-year basis? Please explain. 5. Project Annual Cost a. Salary & Benefits Costs: b. Support Costs: (services, supplies, equipment, etc.) c. Less revenue or expenditure: d. Net cost to General or other fund: 6. Briefly explain the consequences of not filling the project position(s) in terms of: a. potential future costs d. political implications b. legal implications e. organizational implications c. financial implications 7. Briefly describe the alternative approaches to delivering the services which you have considered. Indicate why these alternatives were not chosen. 8. Departments requesting new project positions must submit an updated cost benefit analysis of each project position at the halfway point of the project duration. This report is to be submitted to the Human Resources Department, which will forward the report to the Board of Supervisors. Indicate the date that your cost / benefit analysis will be submitted 9. How will the project position(s) be filled? a. Competitive examination(s) b. Existing employment list(s) Which one(s)? c. Direct appointment of: 1. Merit System employee who will be placed on leave from current job 2. Non-County employee Provide a justification if filling position(s) by C1 or C2 USE ADDITIONAL PAPER IF NECESSARY March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 335 March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes336 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment & Human Services Department Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with California Department of Education, effective February 1, 2016, to increase the payment limit by $51,144 for a new total limit of $4,105,899, to provide for childcare and development programs (CalWORKS Stage 2) with no change to term July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2016. FISCAL IMPACT: 100% State funding No County match State: C2AP 5009 / Amend 1 County: 29-213-27 BACKGROUND: The Department received notification on June 3, 2015 from California Department of Education for the 2015-16 funding allocation for alternative payment / CalWORKS Stage 2 childcare services. The Board approved receipt of funds on July 7, 2016 (C.79). This State program provides funding to reimburse a portion of the childcare APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 03/08/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: CSB (925) 681-6304 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: March 8, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: Jagjit Bhambra, Haydee Ilan, Cassandra Youngblood C. 30 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director Date:March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:2015-16 Calif. Dept. of Educ. CalWORKS Stage 2 childcare revenue contract, Amend #1 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 337 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) costs incurred by CalWORKS Stage 2 participants through their participation in the CalWORKS program. As the program year continues, the State routinely adds funding to the contract as more funds become available. This board order is to accept receipt of additional funding. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If not approved, County will not have funds to operate CalWORKS Stage 2 childcare program. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: The Employment & Human Services Department Community Services Bureau supports three of Contra Costa County’s community outcomes - Outcome 1: “Children Ready for and Succeeding in School,” Outcome 3: “Families that are Economically Self-sufficient,” and, Outcome 4: “Families that are Safe, Stable, and Nurturing.” These outcomes are achieved by offering comprehensive services, including high quality early childhood education, nutrition, and health services to low-income children throughout Contra Costa County. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 338 RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve and authorize the Health Services Director, or his designee, to execute, on behalf of the County, Amendment Agreement 28-849-3 (#13-20048-A03) with the California Department of Public Health, effective April 1, 2015, to make technical adjustments to the budget, to increase the amount payable to County by $21,333 from $1,330,064 to a new total payment limit of $1,351,397, with no change in the original term from March 31, 2014 through March 31, 2016. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this Amendment will result in an increase in the amount of $21,333 from the California Department of Public Health. No County funds are required. BACKGROUND: The goals of the California Department of Public Health, Office of AIDS are: 1) to minimize new HIV infections; and 2) to maximize the number of people with HIV infection who access appropriate care, treatment, support and prevention services. The services required by the HIV Prevention Program, scope of work, in this Agreement are consistent with, and are designed to APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 03/08/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Daniel Peddycord, 925-313-6712 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: March 8, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: J Pigg, M Wilhelm C. 29 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Amendment Agreement #28-849-3 with the California Department of Public Health March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 339 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) support these goals. On September 10, 2013, the Board of Supervisors approved Standard Agreement #28-849 (as amended by Standard Agreement #28-849-2 and #28-849-3), for County to provide residents of Contra Costa County access to medical and support care services, including outreach and treatment under the HIV Care Program and Minority AIDS Initiative project, for the period from July 1, 2013 through March 31, 2016, which included agreeing to indemnify and hold the State harmless for claims arising out of the County’s performance under the Agreement. Approval of Contract Amendment Agreement #28-849-3 will make technical adjustments to the budget, allowing the County to receive additional funds to continue providing medical and support care services through March 31, 2016. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this amendment is not approved, County will not receive the necessary funding to support the reduction in transmission of HIV; to provide the prevention services that will reduce hospitalization; and to provide support to HIV positive individuals in their homes; or to support compliance with State and Federal requirements for reporting of communicable disease. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: Not applicable. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 340 RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve and authorize the Health Services Director, or his designee, to execute, on behalf of the County, Grant Award Amendment #29-393-25, with the California Department of Public Health, Tuberculosis (TB) Control Branch, effective February 1, 2016, to amend Grant Award #29-393-24, to increase the amount payable to County by $23,476 from $291,142 to a new total of $314,618, with no change in the original term of July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2016. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this amendment will result in an increase of $23,476 for the base award, food, shelter, incentives, and enablers (FSIE), from the State of California, TB Control Branch for fiscal year 2015-2016. (No County match required) The FSIE allotment will be used to purchase the following gift cards: 200 SaveMart Gift Cards with a value of $20/card for a total of $4,000. 300 Target Gift Cards with a value of $20/card for a total of $6,000. 125 Safeway Gift Cards with a value of $20/card for a total of $2,500. 50 Walmart Gift Cards with a value APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 03/08/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Daniel Peddycord 313-6712 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: March 8, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: D Morgan, M Wilhelm C. 27 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Award Amendment #29-393-25 with the California Department of Public Health, Tuberculosis Control Branch March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 341 FISCAL IMPACT: (CONT'D) of $20/card for a total of $1,000. The remaining FSIE balance of $3,099 will be used as needed including for taxi vouchers, bus passes and rent subsidies. BACKGROUND: The Contra Costa County, Public Health Department maintains a TB Control Program, which serves all reported TB patients and their contacts in Contra Costa County. Outreach services are provided to reach the “Hard-to Reach” people with TB and those at high risk. The TB control staff work within the Communicable Disease Section in collaboration with the HIV/AIDS Program, Substance Abuse Programs, Contra Costa Regional Medical Center and Health Centers, and providers throughout the County. On August 18, 2015, the Board of Supervisors approved a Grant Award #29-393-24 with the California Department of Public Health, TB Control Branch, for the County’s FSIE TB Control Program, which included food, shelter, incentives and enablers, taxi voucher, bus passes and rent subsidies for the period from July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2016. Approval of Grant Award Amendment #29-393-25 will allow the Department to receive additional funds for the Tuberculosis Control Program, through June 30, 2016. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, the County will not be able to purchase the food, shelter, incentives and enablers gift cards for the TB patients. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: Not Applicable March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 342 RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve and authorize the Health Services Director, or his designee, to execute on behalf of the County, Grant Agreement #28-873-1 (#20162203) with the California Endowment, to pay the County an amount not to exceed $302,028, for the Richmond Public Health Solutions (RPHS) Project, for the period from February 1, 2016 through January 31, 2018. FISCAL IMPACT: This agreement will result in up to $302,028 of funding from the California Endowment for the County’s Richmond Public Health Solutions Project. No County match required. BACKGROUND: Health disparities are associated with poor education outcomes, and in Richmond, Latino and African American residents face disproportionate rates of preventable chronic illness such as heart disease, obesity, and cancer. Public Health agencies alone cannot reduce these disparities, but working collaboratively with other governmental agencies, educational institutions APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 03/08/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Dan Peddycord, 313-6712 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: March 8, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: D Morgan, M Wilhelm C. 28 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Grant Agreement #28-873-1 with the California Endowment March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 343 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) and community-based organizations RPHS can provide Richmond youth the skills and experience they need to advance their education, learn community advocacy and become part of the public health workforces. The goal of the project is to expose approximately 120 high school juniors enrolled in De Anza’s Health Academy, composed primarily of youth of color, to public health concepts, practices and careers, through January 31, 2018. This Agreement includes agreeing to indemnify and hold the grantor harmless for any claims arising out of County’s performance of this agreement. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, the County will not receive funds to support the Public Health Richmond Public Health Solutions (RPHS) Project participants. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: Not Applicable March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 344 RECOMMENDATION(S): Acknowledge receipt of notice from William C. Lyon, M.D., APC, a corporation, requesting termination of Contract #27-627-4, for the provision of orthopedic surgery services for Contra Costa Health Plan members, effective at close of business on December 1, 2015. FISCAL IMPACT: This Contract was funded 100% Contra Costa Health Plan Enterprise Fund II. BACKGROUND: On October 7, 2014, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #27-627-4 with William C. Lyon, M.D., APC, a corporation, for the provision of orthopedic surgery services, for the period from September 1, 2014 through August 31, 2016. The purpose of this Board Order is to advise the Board of Supervisors that the Contractor closed his medical practice on December 1, 2015. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Not applicable CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: Not applicable. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 03/08/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Patricia Tanquary 313 -6004 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: March 8, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: A Floyd , M Wilhelm C. 39 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Acknowledge Termination of Contract #27-627-4 with William C. Lyon, M.D., APC March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 345 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director or his designee, to execute on behalf of the County, Agreement #23-590 with Heat Software USA, Inc., a corporation, in an amount not to exceed $494,643, to provide software and services for Health Services Information Technology service requests and incident management administration, for the period March 30, 2016 through March 29, 2019. FISCAL IMPACT: The Agreement is funded 100% by Hospital Enterprise Fund I. BACKGROUND: The Health Services Department’s Information Technology Unit is currently using outdated technology which lacks basic functionality. The Contractor’s Heat Software will allow the Department more easy use of incident management, license management, quick access to data, scheduling and running reports along with ease of administration and support. Under Agreement #23-590, the Contractor will provide software services, including implementation services, software licensing, hosting, and support, to the Information Technology APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 03/08/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: David Runt, 313-6228 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: March 8, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: T Scott, M Wilhelm, Brian Schroeder C. 33 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Agreement #23-590 with Heat Software USA, Inc. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 346 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Unit, during the period from March 30, 2016, though March 29, 2019. The Agreement requires the parties to execute an End User License Agreement, in the form attached to the Agreement, which will license the software to the County. Under the Agreement, the Contractor’s liability to the County, for indemnity or otherwise, is limited to the amounts paid by the County under the Agreement. The standard insurance requirements also have been modified to eliminate the requirement that the County and its officers and employees be named as additional insureds under the Contractor’s commercial general liability insurance policy. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, County will not be able to receive software services to adequately monitor service requests and incidents submitted to the Information Technology Unit for trouble shooting and the software version will no longer be supported by the current Vendor (end of life). CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: Not Applicable. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 347 RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve and authorize the Health Services Director, or his designee, to execute, on behalf of the County, Contract Amendment Agreement #26-347-26 with Cross Country Staffing, Inc. (dba Medical Staffing Network), a corporation, effective November 1, 2015, to amend Contract #26-347-25, to add additional hourly rates for two classifications to the rate sheet, with no change in the original payment limit of $8,000,000, and no change in the original term July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2016. FISCAL IMPACT: This amendment reflects a change to the rate sheet to include local hourly rates for X-Ray technicians and Registered Nurse Specialty in addition to travel rates and is funded 100% Hospital Enterprise I Fund. (Rate increase) BACKGROUND: On June 16, 2015, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #26-347-25 with Cross Country Staffing, Inc., (dba Medical Staffing Network) for the period from July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2016, for the provision of temporary medical services including nursing, therapy, radiology and pharmacy services for Contra Costa Regional Medical and Contra Costa Health Centers (CCRMC). The Division is experiencing staffing shortages in Registered Nurse and X-Ray Technician specialties at CCRMC. Approval of Contract Amendment Agreement #26-347-26 will allow Contractor to provide an additional level of temporary help services through June 30, 2016. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 03/08/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Anna Roth, 925-370-5101 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: March 8, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: C. 40 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Amendment Agreement #26-347-26 with Cross Country Staffing, Inc. (dba Medical Staffing Network) March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 348 CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this amendment is not approved, patients requiring specialty services at CCRMC will not have access to Contractor’s services. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: Not applicable. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 349 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Chief Information Officer, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Infosec Professionals, LLC, to decrease the payment limit from $120,000 to a new payment limit of $62,000 with no change in the term of July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2016, for continuing information security services FISCAL IMPACT: The cost of $62,000 is budgeted under Org# 1055, FY2015/16 and recovered through Security Rates charged to all County departments (based on staff count) via DoIT’s billing process. BACKGROUND: On June 9, 2015, the Board of Supervisors approved a contract with Infosec Professionals, LLC, to provide information security services. The sole employee of Infosec Professionals, LLC, is Tim Carlisle, a County retiree who previously worked in the Department of Information Technology. The original contract does not place a limit on the number of hours Mr. Carlisle can perform services for the County. In order to avoid jeopardizing Mr. Carlisle’s post-employment benefits under the Public Employees' Pension Reform Act of 2013, he cannot perform more than 960 hours of services in any fiscal year. The contract is being amended to limit the number of hours of services to 960 and to decrease the contract payment limit correspondingly. In accordance with Administrative Bulletin No 611.0, County Departments are required to obtain Board approval for single item purchases over $100,000. The County Administrator’s Office has reviewed this request and recommends approval. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 03/08/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Ed Woo (925) 383-2688 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: March 8, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: C. 41 To:Board of Supervisors From:Ed Woo, Chief Information Officer Date:March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Amendment to Infosec Professionals, LLC Services Contract for Informaion Security Support March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 350 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the County Administrator, or designee to execute a contract amendment agreement between the County and Steckbauer Weinhart, LLP, effective November 1, 2015 to increase the payment limit by $25,000 to a new payment limit of $125,000 for continued legal services on behalf of the County on a case-by-case basis in the area of tax related bankruptcy matters, as requested by the County Counsel and the Treasurer-Tax Collector. FISCAL IMPACT: Funding for legal services is included in the FY 2015-16 budget. (100% General Fund) BACKGROUND: Contract #49076-00 with Steckbauer Weinhart, LLP was executed in April 2013 and the Treasurer-Tax Collector’s office respectfully requests an increase of $25,000 for Contract #49076-00 from November 1, 2015 through the end of the of contract term, April 30, 2016. The increase amount of the contract will ensure that sufficient resources are available to pay outstanding invoices and for County Counsel and the Treasurer-Tax Collector to refer additional bankruptcy cases to Steckbauer Weinhart, LLP as needed during the remainder of the contract. The need for the legal services on bankruptcy cases is instrumental in collecting outstanding debt by claimants owing taxes and if a claim is not filed when the County is notified, the County has no recourse to collect the taxes associated with the claim. Although County Counsel has significantly helped on many of the bankruptcy cases, the need for additional attorney services has been necessary at times due to the complexity of certain cases. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 03/08/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Brice Bins, (925) 957-2848 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: March 8, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: Robert Campbell, County Auditor-Controller C. 35 To:Board of Supervisors From:Russell Watts, Treasurer-Tax Collector Date:March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract Amendment Agreement - Steckbauer Weinhart, LLP March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 351 ATTACHMENTS Steckbauer Weinhart, LLP Contract March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 352 Form L-7 (Page 1 of 1) Contra Costa County CONTRACT AMENDMENT AGREEMENT Number: 49076-00 Standard Form L-7 (Purchase o f Services – Long Form) Fund/Org: 0015 Revised 2014 Account: Other: 1. Identification of Contract to be Amended. Number: 49076-00 Effective Date: 05/01/2013 Department: Treasurer – Tax Collector Subject: Legal S ervices 2. Parties. The County of Contra Costa, California (County), for its Department named above, and the following named Contractor mutually agree and promise as follows: Contractor: Steckbauer Weinhart, LLP Capacity: Limited Liability Partnership Address: 333 South Hope Street, 36th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90071 3. Amendment Date. The effective date of this Contract Amendment Agreement is November 1, 2015 . 4. Amendment Specifications. The C ontract identified above is hereby amended as set forth in the “Amendment Specifications” attached hereto which are incorporated herein by reference. 5. Signatures. These signatures attest the parties’ agreement hereto: COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, CALIFORNIA BOARD OF SUPERVISORS By: ___________________________________________ Chair/Designee ATTEST: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: ___________________________________________ Deputy CONTRACTOR Signature A Name of business entity: By: ___________________________________________ (Signature of individual or officer) ___________________________________________ (Print name and title A, if applicable) Signature B Name of business entity: By: ___________________________________________ (Signature of individual or officer) ___________________________________________ (Print name and title B, if applicable) Note to Contractor: For corporations (profit or nonprofit) and limited liability companies, the contract must be signed by two officers. Signature A must be that of the chairman of the board, president, or vice-president; and Signature B must be that of the secretary, any assistant secretary, chief financial officer or any assistant treasurer (Civil Code Section 1190 and Corporations Code Section 313). All signatures must be acknowledged as set forth on Form L-2. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 353 AMENDMENT SPECIFICATIONS CONTRACT NO. 49076-00 Steckbauer Weinhart, LLP Payment Limit. Paragraph 4 of Form L-1 is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following paragraph: 4. Payment Limit. County’s total payments to Contractor under this Contract shall not exceed $125,000. Initials: Contractor County March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 354 RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve and authorize the Health Services Director, or his designee, to execute, on behalf of the County, Contract Amendment Agreement #27-799-5 with Health Management Systems, Inc., a corporation, effective February 1, 2016, to amend Contract #27-799-4, to increase the payment limit by $200,000, from $650,000 to a new payment limit of $850,000, with no change in the original term of February 1, 2015 through January 31, 2017. FISCAL IMPACT: This amendment is funded 100% by Contra Costa Health Plan Enterprise Fund II. (No rate increase) BACKGROUND: Contra Costa Health Plan is mandated by State and Federal law to have a comprehensive fraud, waste, and abuse prevention and detection program which must include measures that prevent, detect, and correct noncompliance with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) program requirements. On April 21, 2015, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #27-799-4 with Health Management Systems, Inc. for the provision of auditing services, for the period from February 1, 2015 through January 31, 2017. At the time of negotiations, the payment limit was based on target levels of utilization. However, based on revised projections, actual usage will exceed the target levels by the end of the Contract term. Approval of Contract Amendment Agreement #27-799-5 will allow the Contractor to continue providing services through January 31, 2017. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 03/08/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Patricia Tanquary, 313-6004 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: March 8, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: A Floyd, M Wilhelm C. 36 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract Amendment Agreement #27-799-5 with Health Management Systems, Inc. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 355 CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this amendment is not approved, the Health Plan will be out of compliance with CMS services program requirements. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: Not Applicable March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 356 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Delta Personnel Services, Inc., dba Guardian Security Agency, effective March 1, 2016, increasing the payment limit by $20,000 to a new payment limit of $357,110 to provide security services for the period July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2016. (2.4% County, 48.8% State, 48.8% Federal) FISCAL IMPACT: $357,110; $85,000 Employment and Human Services Department Administrative Overhead (10% County, 45% State, 45% Federal); $272,110 Employment and Human Services, Community Services Bureau (50% State, 50% Federal). BACKGROUND: The Employment and Human Services Department (EHSD) maintains an agreement with the County Health Services Department to provide public security officers (PSOs) at several EHSD locations. EHSD, through a contract with Delta Personnel Services, Inc., dba Guardian Security Agency (Guardian), provides security personnel services at EHSD sites when the PSOs are unavailable due to vacation schedules, illness, on alternative work schedules, for night and weekend work, and APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 03/08/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: V. Kaplan, 3-1514 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: March 8, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: C. 31 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director Date:March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract amendment with Delta Personnel Services, Inc., dba Guardian Security Agency, Security Guard Services March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 357 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) social occasions/events. Guardian provides contingency security services to EHSD locations. Upon request from EHSD, Guardian will provide security personnel services to perform temporary and unanticipated security related services to safeguard equipment and property, prepare reports, conduct visual checks of area in and around EHSD suites, monitor and respond at the request of staff regarding unauthorized visitors to insure the safety of visitors and employees at EHSD locations. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: County building sites, property, and staff would not have security and safety mechanisms in place. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: Not applicable. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 358 RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve and authorize the Health Services Director, or his designee, to execute, on behalf of the County, Contract #26-410 with La Clinica de La Raza, Inc., a non-profit corporation, to provide transfer and coordination of care for patients requiring emergency medical care at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center, for the period from March 1, 2016 through February 28, 2018. FISCAL IMPACT: This is a non-financial agreement. BACKGROUND: The goal of this Care Transition Agreement is provide continuity of care for La Clinica de La Raza, Inc. patients who are treated at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center and ensure that these patients are connected with their primary medical home after the hospital visit. Approval of Contract #26-410 will articulate the roles of the parties with regard to transfer and coordination of patients who have been hospitalized at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center, through February 28, 2018. This agreement includes mutual indemnification to hold harmless both parties for any claims arising out of the performance of this Agreement. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 03/08/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Samir Shah, M.D., 370-5475 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: March 8, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: T Scott, M Wilhelm C. 34 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #26-410 with La Clinica de La Raza, Inc. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 359 CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, the transfer and coordination of care for these patients may not be in compliance with all applicable Federal and State statutes and regulations, including the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA). CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: Not applicable. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 360 RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve and authorize the Health Services Director or his designee, to execute, on behalf of the County, Contract #26-792-3 with Edward Y. Tang, M.D. Inc. a professional corporation, in an amount not to exceed $400,000, to provide orthopedic services at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center and Contra Costa Health Centers (CCRMC), for the period from March 1, 2016 through February 28, 2017. FISCAL IMPACT: This Contract is funded 100% by Hospital Enterprise Fund I. (Rate increase) BACKGROUND: On March 10, 2015, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #26-792 (as amended by Amendment Agreements #26-792-1 and #26-792-2) with Edward Tang, M.D. to provide orthopedic services at CCRMC including but not limited to consultation, training, on-call coverage and medical/surgical procedures, through February 29, 2016. Approval of Contract #26-792-3 will allow the Contractor to continue to provide services, through February 28, 2017. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 03/08/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Samir Shah, MD, 370-5475 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: March 8, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: Tasha Scott, M Wilhelm C. 38 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #26-792-3 with Edward Y Tang, M.D., Inc. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 361 CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this Contract is not approved, patients requiring orthopedic services at CCRMC will not have access to Contractor’s services. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: Not applicable. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 362 RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve and authorize the Health Services Director, or his designee, to execute, on behalf of the County, Contract #72-082 with Children’s Hospital & Research Center at Oakland (dba UCSF Benioff Children’s’ Hospital Oakland), a non-profit corporation, in an amount not to exceed $20,360, to provide specialized training and case conference group sessions to County’s Family Maternal & Child Health, Home Visiting Programs, for the period from July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2016. FISCAL IMPACT: This Contract is funded 100% California Department of Public Health. BACKGROUND: Under Contract #72-082, the Contractor will provide two one-day trainings on reflective supervision for the Family, Maternal & Child Health Home Visiting Programs and partners in Public Health and conduct 24/4 hour sessions of reflective case conference group sessions for the FMCH Nurse-Family Partnership Program staff, through June 30, 2016, including exploring clinical issues, discussing theoretical and practical issues and strategies for use in cases. This Contract includes mutual indemnification. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 03/08/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Dan Peddycord, 925-313-6712 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: March 8, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: J Pigg, M Wilhelm C. 37 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #72-082 with Children’s Hospital & Research Center at Oakland (dba UCSF Benioff Children’s’ Hospital Oakland) March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 363 CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, County will not receive specialized training from this Contractor. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: Not Applicable March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 364 RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve and authorize the Auditor-Controller, or designee, to pay the San Ramon Valley Fire Protection District $33,000 for EMS Fire First Responder medical equipment, medical supplies and EMS training to the San Ramon Valley Fire Protection District, upon approval of EMS Director for FY 2015-16. FISCAL IMPACT: Funding for this expenditure has been budgeted under CSA EM-1, Zone A (Measure H). There is no General Fund impact. BACKGROUND: These funds are allocated to partially offset fire services’ added costs for medical supplies, equipment, and training through participation in an enhanced Emergency Medical Services system established through CSA EM-1. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Fire services would need to fund medical supplies, equipment and training out of their existing funds. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 03/08/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Pat Frost, 646-4690 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: March 8, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: T Scott, M Wilhelm, Leticia Andreas C. 32 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Fire Funding for Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Enhancements from Measure H Funds March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 365 RECOMMENDATION(S): 1. ACKNOWLEDGE that the Board of Supervisors referred (9) nine issues to the Public Protection Committee (PPC) for its review and consideration during 2015. 2. FIND that the 2015 PPC convened ten (10) meetings, worked through and provided an opportunity for public input on a number of significant Countywide issues. 3. RECOGNIZE the excellent work of the County department staff who provided the requisite information to the PPC in a timely and professional manner, and members of the Contra Costa community and other public agencies who, through their interest in improving the quality of life in Contra Costa County, provided valuable insight into our discussions, and feedback that helped us to formulate our policy recommendations. 4. ACCEPT year-end productivity report and APPROVE recommended disposition of PPC referrals described at the end of this report. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. This is an informational report only. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 03/08/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Timothy Ewell, (925) 335-1036 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: March 8, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: C. 48 To:Board of Supervisors From:PUBLIC PROTECTION COMMITTEE Date:March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:2015 YEAR-END REPORT ON ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND DISPOSITION OF REMAINING REFERRALS TO THE PUBLIC PROTECTION COMMITTEE March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 366 BACKGROUND: The Public Protection Committee (PPC) was established on January 8, 2008 to study criminal justice and public protection issues and formulate recommendations for consideration by the Board of Supervisors. At the February 29, 2016 meeting, the Committee discussed all issues currently on referral and has made the following recommendations to the Board of Supervisors for the 2016 PPC work-plan: 1. Opportunities to Improve Coordination of Response to Disasters and Other Public Emergencies. Approximately three weeks following the November 2007 Cosco Busan oil spill, the Sheriff’s Office of Emergency Services (OES) presented to the Board of Supervisors its assessment of the emergency response efforts, including what worked well and didn’t work well, and what lessons were learned through those experiences. At the conclusion of the Board discussion, Supervisor Gioia introduced five recommendations that were approved by the Board. On February 5, 2008 the Board of Supervisors referred this matter to the PPC for continuing development and oversight. PPC received a status report from the Office of the Sheriff and Health Services Department in February 2009 and requested the Hazardous Materials Program Manager to report back to the PPC on the development of mutual aid agreements from local oil refineries. Following a second briefing to the PPC by the Office of the Sheriff, the PPC reported out to the Board of Supervisors on May 6, 2009 with recommendations for follow-up by the Sheriff and Human Resources departments. The Health Services Department made a report to the PPC on April 19, 2010 regarding the resources and connections available to respond to hazardous materials emergencies and, again, on October 18, 2010 regarding who determines which local official participates in incident command if an event is in Contra Costa County. On December 5, 2011, Health Services reported to our Committee regarding training and deployment of community volunteers. In January 2008, the Board of Supervisors referred to the PPC the matter of improving public response to emergency instructions and protocols through broader and better education, which had previously been on referral to the IOC. The Board suggested that the PPC work with the Office of the Sheriff, the Health Services Department, and the CAER (Community Awareness & Emergency Response) Program to determine what educational efforts are being made and what additional efforts may be undertaken to improve public response and safety during an emergency. In April 2011, the PPC met with CAER (Community Awareness Emergency Response) Executive Director Tony Semenza and staff from the Office of the Sheriff and Health Services to discuss what has been done to better inform the public and what more can be done to improve public response to emergency warnings. CAER provided a thorough report on its countywide community fairs, and programs targeted at the education system and non-English speaking populations. The PPC asked CAER to provide a written outreach strategy that describes how new homeowners are educated about emergency awareness. The Sheriff's Office of Emergency Services provided an update to the Committee at the April 13, 2015 meeting. In addition, the draft update of the Countywide Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) was reviewed and forwarded to the BOS for review and approval. Recommendation: REFER to the 2016 PPC 2. Welfare Fraud Investigation and Prosecution. In September 2006, the Employment and Human Services (EHS) Department updated the Internal Operations Committee (IOC) on its efforts to improve internal security and loss prevention activities. The IOC had requested the department to report back in nine months on any tools and procedures that have been developed and implemented to detect changes in income eligibility for welfare benefits. The EHS Director made follow-up reports to IOC in May and October 2007, describing what policies, procedures, and practices are employed by the Department to ensure that public benefits are provided only to those who continue to meet income eligibility requirements, explaining the complaint and follow-through process, and providing statistical data for 2005/06, 2006/07, and for the first quarter of 2007/08. Upon creation of the PPC in January 2008, this matter was reassigned from the IOC to the PPC. PPC has received status reports on this referral in October 2008, June and October 2010, November 2011, November 2012 and, most recently, in December 2013. The Committee has reviewed the transition of welfare fraud collections from the former March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 367 Office of Revenue Collection to the Employment and Human Services Department; the fraud caseload and percentage of fraud findings; fraud prosecutions and the number of convictions; and the amounts recovered. As the PPC wishes to monitor performance of the welfare fraud program annually, it is recommended that this matter be retained on referral. Recommendation: REFER to the 2016 PPC 3. Multi-Language Capability of the Telephone Emergency Notification System. This matter had been on referral to the IOC since 2000 and was reassigned to the PPC in January 2008. The PPC met with Sheriff and Health Services Department staff in March 2008 to receive an update on the County’s efforts to implement multilingual emergency telephone messaging. The Committee learned that the Federal Communications Commission has before it two rulemaking proceedings that may directly affect practices and technology for multilingual alerting and public notification. Additionally, the federally-funded Bay Area “Super Urban Area Safety Initiative” (SUASI) has selected a contractor undertake an assessment and develop a five-year strategic plan on notification of public emergencies, with an emphasis on special needs populations. The Sheriff’s Office of Emergency Services reported to the PPC in April 2009 that little has changed since the March 2008 report. On October 18, 2010, the PPC received a report from the Sheriff’s Office of Emergency Services on the Community Warning and Telephone Emergency Notification systems, and on developments at the federal level that impact those systems and related technology. Sheriff staff concluded that multi-lingual public emergency messaging is too complex to be implemented at the local level and should be initiated at the state and federal levels. New federal protocols are now being established to provide the framework within which the technological industries and local agencies can work to develop these capabilities. In 2011, the Office of the Sheriff has advised staff that a recent conference on emergency notification systems unveiled nothing extraordinary in terms of language translation. The SUASI project had just commenced and Sheriff staff have been on the contact list for a workgroup that will be developing a gap analysis, needs assessment, and five-year strategic plan. This matter has been on committee referral for more than ten years and technology has yet to provide a feasible solution for multilingual public emergency messaging. On September 18, 2012, following the Richmond Chevron refinery fire, the Board of Supervisors established an ad hoc committee to discuss the Community Warning System and Industrial Safety Ordinance. Since that committee is ad hoc in nature, we recommend that this issue remain on referral to the PPC. The PPC received two updates on this issue in CY 2015; one on April 13, 2015 and one on November 9, 2015. The Committee continues to have interest in monitoring the implementation of a multi-lingual telephone ring down system for emergencies. This issue should remain on referral to the Committee in 2016. Recommendation: REFER to the 2016 PPC 4. County support and coordination of non-profit organization resources to provide prisoner re-entry services, implementation of AB 109 Public Safety Realignment, and appointment recommendations to the Community Corrections Partnership . On August 25, 2009, the Board of Supervisors referred to the PPC a presentation by the Urban Strategies Council on how the County might support and coordinate County and local non-profit organization resources to create a network of re-entry services for individuals who are leaving jail or prison and are re-integrating in local communities. On September 14, 2009, the PPC invited the Sheriff-Coroner, County Probation Officer, District Attorney, Public Defender, Health Services Director, and Employment and Human Services Director to hear a presentation by the Urban Strategies Council. The PPC encouraged County departments to participate convene a task force to work develop a network for prisoner re-entry services, which has been meeting independently from the PPC. The PPC received a status report from County departments in April 2010. The Employment and Human Services department reported on its efforts to weave together a network of services, utilizing ARRA funding for the New Start Program and on the role of One-Stop Centers in finding jobs for state parolees. Probation reported on the impacts of March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 368 the anticipated flood of state parolees into the county. The Sheriff reported on the costs for expanding local jail capacity and possible expanded use of GPS (global positioning systems) use in monitoring state parolees released back to our county. The Health Services Department reported on its Healthcare for the Homeless Program as a means to get parolees into the healthcare system and on its development of cross-divisional teams on anti-violence. The Public Defender reported on its Clean State Program, which has since been discontinued. Supervisors Glover and Gioia indicated that their staff would continue to coordinate this local initiative when the Urban Strategies Council exhausts its grant funding from the California Endowment. The PPC continued to monitor progress on the initiative and, on February 7, 2011, received a presentation of the completed strategic plan and recommendations. In response to public testimony at the PPC meeting regarding concerns over the "Ban the Box" element of the plan, the plan recommendations were modified to exclude from the "Ban the Box" requirement certain identified sensitive positions in public safety and children’s services or as determined by the agency. On March 22, 2011, representatives from the Urban Strategies Council presented the completed Contra Costa County Re-entry Strategic Plan (100 pages), an Executive Summary (6 pages) of the plan, and a slide show to the Board of Supervisors, which approved the strategic plan and implementation recommendations with one modification: rather than adopt a 'Ban the Box' policy as recommended, which would have removed the question about criminal records from county employment applications during the initial application, the Board agreed to consider adopting such a policy at a future date. The Board directed the County Administrator to work with the offices of Supervisors Glover and Gioia to identify the resources needed to implement the strategic plan and to report back to the Board with his findings and recommendations. Later in 2011, the California Legislature passed the Public Safety Realignment Act (Assembly Bills 109), which transfers responsibility for supervising specific low-level inmates and parolees from the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) to counties. Assembly Bill 109 (AB 109) takes effect October 1, 2011 and realigns three major areas of the criminal justice system. On a prospective basis, the legislation: • Transfers the location of incarceration for lower-level offenders (specified non-violent, non-serious, non-sex offenders) from state prison to local county jail and provides for an expanded role for post-release supervision for these offenders; • Transfers responsibility for post-release supervision of lower-level offenders (those released from prison after having served a sentence for a non-violent, non-serious, and non-sex offense) from the state to the county level by creating a new category of supervision called Post-Release Community Supervision (PRCS); • Transfers the housing responsibility for parole and PRCS revocations to local jail custody AB 109 also tasked the local Community Corrections Partnership (CCP) with recommending to the County Board of Supervisors a plan for implementing the criminal justice realignment, which shall be deemed accepted by the Board unless rejected by a 4/5th vote. The Executive Committee of the CCP is composed of the County Probation Officer (Chair), Sheriff-Coroner, a Chief of Police (represented by the Concord Police Chief in 2014), District Attorney, Public Defender, Presiding Judge of the Superior Court or designee, and the Behavioral Health Director. On October 4, 2011, the Board of Supervisors approved the CCP Realignment Implementation Plan, including budget recommendations for fiscal year 2011/12. Throughout 2012, the PPC received regular status updated from county staff on the implementation of public safety realignment, including recommendations from the CCP-Executive Committee for 2012/13 budget planning. On January 15, 2013 the Board of Supervisors approved a 2012/13 budget for continuing implementation of public safety realignment programming. The Committee received several reentry/AB 109 related presentations and updates throughout 2014, including program updates, review of the proposed fiscal year 2014/15 AB 109 Public Safety Realignment budget and made appointment recommendations to the Board of Supervisors for the CY 2015 Community Corrections Partnership. In addition, the Committee evaluated the feasibility of submitting a grant proposal for the 2014 Byrne Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) released by the California Board of State and Community Corrections. As public safety realignment is a work in progress and continues to make up a substantial part of the Committee's time. In 2015, the Committee reviewed the FY 2015/16 AB 109 budget proposed by the CCP, made appointment March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 369 recommendations for the CY2016 CCP and CCP-Executive Committee to the Board of Supervisors and advised on grant programs that tie into AB 109 programming infrastructure, such as the Community Recidivism Reduction Grant (CRRG). It is recommended that this matter remain on referral to the 2016 PPC. Recommendation: REFER to the 2016 PPC 5. Countywide 9-1-1 Wireless Capability. On December 14, 2010, the Board of Supervisors referred to the PPC a letter from the Emergency Medical Care Committee regarding the transmission of 9-1-1 emergency calls from cellular phones to the appropriate Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP). Our Committee met with representatives from the Office of the Sheriff on April 4 to discuss the status of establishing Sheriff's Dispatch as the PSAP for county unincorporated area wireless emergency calls. Sheriff Department staff advised that the County is not accepting wireless 9-1-1 calls at this time. Staff explained that the GPS (global positioning system) technology exists to enable Sheriff's Dispatch to receive 9-1-1 system emergency calls from cellular phones and to locate the emergency location within some degree of precision. However, due to several years of tight budgets, Sheriff's Dispatch is not currently staffed at a level that is adequate to respond to the call volume associated with the wireless 9-1-1 calls, which are currently routed to the appropriate PSAP by the California Highway Patrol (CHP). While our committee believes that transferring responsibility for handling wireless 9-1-1 calls from the CHP to Sheriff's Dispatch would be more efficient and would improve response time, it is unlikely that the County will be in a position, fiscally, to assume this responsibility in the next year. The PPC reported on April 12, 2011 to the Board of Supervisors and requested the Office of the Sheriff to provide a status report to the PPC in the spring of 2012 to advise if any outside funding becomes available to support such a transition of responsibility. On April 2, 2012, the PPC (Supervisor Glover only; Supervisor Uilkema was absent) received a status report prepared by the Office of the Sheriff on the process that has been initiated to make the partial or full transition of 9-1-1 dispatching from the CHP to the Sheriff a reality within funding constraints. The Sheriff reports that if fully implemented, the call volume for Sheriff’s Dispatch is projected to nearly double (from 56,000 calls to about 100,000 calls annually). Since the County can expect no additional outside revenue or other resources to support the increased call volume, the Sheriff is planning a phased implementation at a rate and call volume that current resources will permit. The phased implementation beginning with smaller carriers will provide the necessary experience and feedback to inform future implementation phases. New carriers will not be added unless the previous carrier can be effectively managed. On April 17, 2012, the PPC provided an update to the Board of Supervisors on this topic and recommended continued monitoring of this referral. The issue will only be scheduled at the request of the Sheriff-Coroner. Recommendation: REFER to the 2016 PPC, but only schedule at the request of the Sheriff 6. Civil gang injunctions. This matter was referred to the PPC on May 12, 2011 at the request of the District Attorney, who suggested under Public Comment at the April 4, 2011 PPC meeting that the Committee consider the use of gang injunctions to help prevent gang violence. The District Attorney has advised committee staff that he is currently focusing on implementing a Ceasefire Program with Richmond Police Department and has requested that this referral be postponed until further notice. The referral will only be scheduled at the request of the District Attorney. Recommendation: REFER to the 2016 PPC, but schedule only upon the request of the District Attorney 7. Report on Emergency Gas Shut Off Valves for various structures in Unincorporated Contra Costa County. On September 25, during a presentation on Emergency Preparedness within Contra Costa County, the Board of Supervisors referred to the Public Protection Committee a report on the county Gas Shut-Off valve ordinance (Ordinance Code § 718-8 et seq.). Originally, the former Building Inspection Department was responsible for regulation related to the Ordinance, now the Department of Conservation and Development (DCD) provides oversight through its Building Inspection Division. On November 5, 2012, the Conservation and Development March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 370 Department provided a review of the program. The Committee requested additional information from staff at the February 2013 regular meeting. The Department returned to the Committee in February 2013 and presented the requested information. The Committee accepted the staff report and recommended no further action. On May 11, 2015, the Department provided an update to the Committee on the status of the ordinance. Following the presentation and discussion, the Committee had no further direction for staff, but indicated that the referral should remain with the Committee. For this reason, we believe that this issue should remain on referral to the PPC. Recommendation: REFER TO 2016 PPC 8. Inmate Welfare Fund/Telecommunications/Visitation Issues. On July 16, 2013, the Board of Supervisors referred a review of the Inmate Welfare Fund (IWF) and inmate visitation policies to the Public Protection Committee for review. The Inmate Welfare Fund is authorized by Penal Code § 4025 for the “…benefit, education, and welfare of the inmates confined within the jail.” The statute also mandates that an itemized accounting of IWF expenditures must be submitted annually to the County Board of Supervisors. The Sheriff's Office has made several reports to the Committee throughout 2013 and 2014 regarding funding of IWF programs, visitation/communication policies and an upcoming RFP for inmate telecommunications services. The referral was placed on hold pending further discussion and outcomes of state and federal level changes to statute or rulemaking that could curtail the collection of telephone commissions individuals contacting inmates and wards housed in county adult and juvenile detention facilities normally pay. Such changes could potentially impact programming provided within the County's detention facilities. In late 2015, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) issued new regulations significantly curtailing the costs charged to inmates or the families of inmates for use of a jail or prison telecommunications system. This rulemaking process will have an impact on the Sheriff's Office and Probation Department beginning in CY 2016. For this reason, this issue should remain on referral to the Committee in 2016. Recommendation: REFER to the 2016 PPC 9. Review of County Service Area (CSA) P-6 Zones. On June 2, 1987, the Board of Supervisors authorized the County Administrator to develop a plan to fund additional Police Services in the unincorporated areas of Contra Costa County. Subsequent to that decision, various Zones within the existing County Service Area P-6 were authorized. According to the Ordinances, each July the Board of Supervisors shall determine the amount of taxes to be levied upon the parcels in each Zone. That amount is, also according to the Ordinances, to be adjusted annually based upon the consumer price index. As of July 2014, there are 116 authorized Zones in County Service Area P-6. On October 7, 2014, the Board of Supervisors referred to the PPC a review of CSA P-6 zones. Following the referral to Committee, staff prepared a comprehensive staff report and presentation for the PPC, which was provided on March 9, 2015. The Committee reported out to the full Board on May 5, 2015 in a workshop format, with the Sheriff in attendance, to discuss the CSA P-6 program more in depth. Following a request for additional information, the Board ultimately approved a spending plan for unallocated CSA P-6 funding at the July 7, 2015 meeting. For this reason, the referral should be discontinued for CY 2016. Recommendation: TERMINATE REFERRAL 10. Racial Justice Coalition of Contra Costa County. On April 7, 2015, the Board of Supervisors received a letter (attached) from the Contra Costa County Racial Justice Coalition requesting review of topics within the local criminal justice system. The PPC generally hears all matters related to public safety within the County. On July 6, 2015, the Committee initiated discussion regarding this referral and directed staff to research certain items identified in the Coalition's letter to the Board of Supervisors and return to the Committee in September 2015. On September 14, 2015, the Committee received a comprehensive report from staff on current data related to race in the Contra Costa County criminal justice system, information regarding the County's Workplace Diversity Training March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 371 and information regarding diversity and implicit bias trainings and presentations from across the country. Following discussion at the meeting the District Attorney, Public Defender and Probation Department were asked to discuss the issue of Disproportionate Minority Contact (DMC) further and report back to the Committee on a proposal for updating a county study on the topic that was released in 2008. On December 14, 2015, the Committee received an update from the departments listed above and determined the potential composition of a Task Force to assist with the update of the 2008 study. Staff was directed to return to the Committee with final recommendations for a proposed work plan to be forwarded to the Board of Supervisors for review and discussion. For this reason, the issue should remain on referral to the PPC in 2016. Recommendation: REFER to the 2016 PPC LIST OF REFERRALS TO BE TERMINATED Report on County Service Area P-6 Zones LIST OF ITEMS TO BE REFERRED TO THE 2016 PUBLIC PROTECTION COMMITTEE Welfare fraud investigation and prosecution Multilingual capabilities of the telephone emergency notification system County support and coordination of non-profit organization resources to provide prisoner re-entry services and implementation of AB109 public safety realignment Directing 9-1-1 emergency calls to the appropriate Public Safety Answering Point (schedule at the request of the Sheriff) Civil gang injunctions (schedule at the request of the District Attorney) Inmate Welfare Fund/Telecommunications/Visitation Issues Opportunities to improve coordination of response to disasters and other public emergencies Report on Emergency Gas Shut Off Valves for various structures in unincorporated Contra Costa County Racial Justice Coalition of Contra Costa County CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The Board of Supervisors will not receive the annual report from the 2015 Public Protection Committee. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: No impact. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 372 RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2016/111 updating and reaffirming the County Debt Management Policy. FISCAL IMPACT: No specific fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: On December 7, 2006 the Finance Committee reviewed and discussed a report regarding establishing a County Debt Management Policy. The Committee directed staff to report to the full Board on December 19, 2006 the recommendation to adopt a formal County Debt Management Policy. A formal policy was adopted on December 19, 2006 (Resolution No. 2006/773). The Board of Supervisors has worked exceptionally hard to address the County’s financial issues and has set very ambitious and necessary goals for lowering cost growth, balancing the budget, and increasing reserves. These solutions are aimed at addressing both short and long term needs and improving the County’s future ability to maintain public services. There are four major financial areas the County Administrator’s office identified which benefited from formal policies: Budget Policy (established November 2006) APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 03/08/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Lisa Driscoll, County Finance Director (925) 335-1023 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: March 8, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: Hon. Robert Campbell, Auditor-Controller, Hon. Russell Watts, Treasurer-Tax Collector, Lisa Driscoll, County Finance Director, John Kopchick, Conservation and Development Director C. 49 To:Board of Supervisors From:David Twa, County Administrator Date:March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:ADOPT Resolution No. 2016/111 reaffirming the County Debt Management Policy, which replaces Resolution No. 2015/245 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 373 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) General Fund Reserve Policy (established December 2005) Facilities Maintenance (included in Budget Policy) Debt Management Policy (established December 2006) Debt affordability standards help the County to evaluate when, why, and how much debt should be issued. In addition to debt affordability standards, the County also adopted a formal Debt Management Policy. The Debt Management Policy: Establishes parameters for issuing and managing debt Provides guidance to decision makers so as not to exceed the debt affordability standards Directs staff on objectives to be achieved both pre- and post-issuance Promotes objectivity in decision-making and limits the role of political influence Facilitates the process by considering and making important policy decisions in advance of an actual financing Periodically, policies should be revised to keep current with best practices or changes in laws. The Debt Affordability Advisory Committee reviews the existing Debt Policy on an annual basis and makes recommendations for revisions to the Board of Supervisions. The following revisions have been made since original adoption: On December 11, 2012, the Board of Supervisors adopted the Debt Affordability Advisory Committee's recommendations and added two additional appendix to the Debt Management Policy (Appendices 2 and 3) and amended two existing sections. The purpose of the Post-Issuance Tax Compliance Procedures for Tax-Exempt and Build America Bonds appendix (Appendix 2) was to establish policies and procedures in connection with tax-exempt bonds and "Build America Bonds" issued by the County of Contra Costa and the County of Contra Costa Public Financing Authority so as to ensure that the County complies with all applicable post-issuance requirements of federal income tax law needed to preserve the tax-exempt or Build America bonds status of bonds. In recognition of the importance of the County meeting its disclosure obligations pursuant to S.E.C. Rule 15c(2)-12, the Committee directed the Finance Director to annually update the Disclosure Requirements Listing that appears in Appendix 3 as well as cause timely filing by the Dissemination Agent of the requisite Annual Reports required under the respective Continuing Disclosure Certificates. Section I of the Policy was amended to require the Debt Affordability Advisory Committee’s review of the debt performance of the Community Facilities Districts (Appendix 4), Multifamily Mortgage Revenue Bond Program (Appendix 5), and the Successor Agency to the former Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency (Appendix 6) to assure that prudent debt management practices extend to these important debt issuers. Section IV.B of the Policy was updated to require the County to issue Requests for Qualifications (RFQs) for financial advisor, bond counsel, disclosure counsel and tax counsel every three years. On March 25, 2014, the Board of Supervisors adopted the Debt Affordability Advisory Committee's recommendations and updated Section II of the Policy to reflect the County's upgraded rating tier from Standard and Poor's of "AAA", and Appendix 3 to reflect the current annual disclosure requirement listing. On March 31, 2015, the Board of Supervisors adopted the Debt Affordability Advisory Committee's recommendations and updated Appendix 2 of the Policy to reflect updated post-issuance compliance requirements for private placements/direct loans. This is in response to a new law that went into effect January 1 that requires all issuers to report private placements/direct loans to the California Debt and Investment Advisory Commission (CDIAC) within 21 days of their occurrence (AB-2274, Chapter 181, Statutes of 2014). On July 16, 2015 the Board of Supervisors adopted the Debt Affordability Advisory Committee's recommendations and updated Debt Affordability measures to better track with current metrics used by credit rating agencies to evaluate the County's financial position. On August 25, 2015 the Board of Supervisors adopted updates to Appendix 3 of the Policy to include updated disclosure requirements and procedures. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 374 The Debt Affordability Advisory Committee met on February 29, 2016 and reviewed the draft FY 2014/15 Debt Report, which includes the Debt Management Policy as an Appendix. Today's action would reaffirm the Debt Management Policy as Resolution No. 2016/111 and include the attached version by reference. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The policy will not be formally reaffirmed by the Board. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2016/111 CCC Debt Management Policy MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Res No. 2016/111 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 375 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 03/08/2016 by the following vote: AYE: John Gioia Candace Andersen Mary N. Piepho Karen Mitchoff Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2016/111 IN THE MATTER OF: Reaffirming the County's Debt Management Policy WHEREAS, the Contra County County Board of Supervisors, acting in its capacity as the Governing Board of the County of Contra Costa and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities governed by the Board wishes to reaffirm its Debt Management Policy, currently adopted as Resolution No. 2015/245. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors, acting in its capacity as the Governing Board of the County of Contra Costa and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities governed by the Board, takes the following actions: 1. The County Debt Management Policy, Resolution No. 2015/245 is hereby replaced by this Resolution No. 2016/111, including the Debt Management Policy as attached. Contact: I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: March 8, 2016 , County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: Hon. Robert Campbell, Auditor-Controller, Hon. Russell Watts, Treasurer-Tax Collector, Lisa Driscoll, County Finance Director, John Kopchick, Conservation and Development Director 5 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 376 March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes377               Contra Costa County, California Debt Management Policy                                                           County Administration 651 Pine Street, 10th Floor Martinez, California 94553 925-335-1023 lisa.driscoll@cao.cccounty.us       Resolution No. 2016/111 Resolution No. 2015/308 Resolution No. 2015/245 Resolution No. 2015/113 Resolution No. 2014/77 Resolution No. 2012/333 Resolution No. 2006/773 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 378 DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICY TABLE OF CONTENTS           I. Purpose 1   II. Debt Affordability Advisory Committee 1   III. Comprehensive Capital Planning 2   IV. Planning and Structure of County Indebtedness 2   V. Method of Sale 4   VI. Refinancing of Outstanding Debt 5   VII. Credit Ratings 6   VIII. Management Practices 6           Government Finance Officers Association: Checklist of Debt Policy Considerations Appendix 1   Post-Issuance Compliance Procedures Appendix 2   Annual Disclosure Requirement Listing Appendix 3   Community Facilities Districts Appendix 4   Multifamily Mortgage Revenue Bond Program Appendix 5   Successor Agency to the former Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency Appendix 6                                             - i - March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 379 1    Contra Costa County, California Debt Management Policy     I. PURPOSE: The County recognizes the foundation of any well-managed debt program is a comprehensive debt policy. A debt policy sets forth the parameters for issuing debt and managing outstanding debt and provides guidance to decision makers regarding the timing and purposes for which debt may be issued, types and amounts of permissible debt, method of sale that may be used and structural features that may be incorporated. The debt policy should recognize a binding commitment to full and timely repayment of all debt as an intrinsic requirement for entry into the capital markets. Adherence to a debt policy helps to ensure that a government maintains a sound debt position and that credit quality is protected. Advantages of a debt policy are as follows:   • enhances the quality of decisions by imposing order and discipline, and promoting consistency and continuity in decision making, • provides rationality in the decision-making process, • identifies objectives for staff to implement, • demonstrates a commitment to long-term financial planning objectives, and • is regarded positively by the rating agencies in reviewing credit quality.     II. DEBT AFFORDABILITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE   A. Purpose. By adoption of this Debt Policy, the Debt Affordability Advisory Committee is established. Its purpose is to annually review and evaluate existing and proposed new County debt and other findings and/or issues the committee considers appropriate.   It is the task of this committee to assess the County’s ability to generate and repay debt. The committee will issue an annual report to the County Administrator defining debt capacity of the County. This review will be an important element of the budget process and will include recommendations made by the committee regarding how much new debt can be authorized by the County without overburdening itself with debt service payments.   B. Members. The committee shall be composed of the Auditor-Controller, Treasurer-Tax Collector, Director/Conservation and Development Department, and County Finance Director.   C. Debt Affordability Measures. The committee shall examine specific statistical measures to determine debt capacity and relative debt position and compare these ratios to other counties, rating agency standards and Contra Costa County’s historical ratios to determine debt affordability. From Moody’s Investors Service, the committee will evaluate the County against the following debt ratios from the most recent available national medians for counties in the “Aa” rating tier with populations of at least 1 million:   1. Direct net debt as a percentage of Assessed Valuation; 2. Overall net debt as a percentage of Assessed Valuation; 3. Assessed Valuation per-capita; 4. Available general fund balance as a percentage of revenues; and 5. General fund balance as a percentage of revenues. From Standard and Poor’s, the committee will evaluate the County against the following debt ratios from the most recent available national medians for counties in the “AAA” rating tier : March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 380 2    1. Assessed valuation per-capita; 2. Direct debt as percentage of governmental funds revenue; 3. Total government available cash as a percentage of debt service; 4. Total government available cash as a percentage of expenditures; and 5. Total debt service as a percentage of general fund expenditures. The Advisory Committee also evaluates the County against a group of cohort counties, namely, other large, urban counties in California. The Advisory Committee utilizes each respective cohort county’s most recently available CAFR to measure the County’s comparative performance on the various debt measures calculated by Moody’s and S&P as noted above, and also against the additional ratios below: 1. Direct debt per capita; and 2. Debt payments as a percentage of general fund revenues. III. COMPREHENSIVE CAPITAL PLANNING   A. Planning. The County Administrator’s Office shall prepare a multi-year capital program for consideration and adoption by the Board of Supervisors as part of the County’s budget process. Annually, the capital budget shall identify revenue sources and expenditures for the coming current year and the next succeeding three fiscal years. The plan shall be updated annually.   B. Funding of the Capital Improvement Program. Whenever possible, the County will first attempt to fund capital projects with grants or state/federal funding, as part of its broader capital improvement plan. When such funds are insufficient, the County will use dedicated revenues to fund projects. If these are not available, the County will use excess surplus from the reserve and debt financing, general revenues. The County shall be guided by three principles in selecting a funding source for capital improvements: equity, effectiveness and efficiency.   1. Equity: Whenever appropriate, the beneficiaries of a project or service will pay for it. For example, if a project is a general function of government that benefits the entire community, such as an Office of Emergency Services, the project will be paid for with general purpose revenues or financed with debt. If, however, the project benefits specific users, such as a building permit facility, the revenues will be derived through user fees or charges, and assessments.   2. Effectiveness: In selecting a source or sources for financing projects, the County will select one or more that effectively funds the total cost of the project. For example, funding a capital project, or the debt service on a project, with a user fee that does not provide sufficient funds to pay for the project is not an effective means of funding the project.   3. Efficiency: If grants or current revenues are not available to fund a project, the County will generally select a financing technique that provides for the lowest total cost consistent with acceptable risk factors and principals of equity and effectiveness. These methods currently consist of County issued debt, special funding programs funded by state or federal agencies, or special pool financing. Examples include funding pools like the Association of Bay Area Governments Participation Certificates. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 381   3    C. Maintenance, Replacement and Renewal/FLIP. The County intends to set aside sufficient current revenues to finance ongoing maintenance needs and to provide periodic replacement and renewal consistent with its philosophy of keeping its capital facilities and infrastructure systems in good repair and to maximize a capital asset’s useful life.   D. Debt Authorization. No County debt issued for the purpose of funding capital projects may be authorized by the Board of Supervisors unless an appropriation has been included in the capital budget (Some forms of debt such as Private Activity Bonds for housing, Mello-Roos for infrastructure, and redevelopment bonds for infrastructure/facilities may not be appropriate for inclusion in the County capital improvement program. The policies for such forms of debt are included as Appendixes 4, 5, and 6).     IV. PLANNING AND STRUCTURE OF COUNTY INDEBTEDNESS   A. Overview. The County shall plan long- and short-term debt issuance to finance its capital program based on its cash flow needs, sources of revenue, capital construction periods, available financing instruments and market conditions. The County Finance Director shall oversee and coordinate the timing, issuance process and marketing of the County’s borrowing and capital funding activities required in support of the capital improvement plan. The County shall finance its capital needs on a regular basis dictated by its capital spending pattern. Over the long-term this policy should result in a consistently low average interest rate. When market conditions in any one year result in higher than average interest rates, the County shall seek refinancing opportunities in subsequent years to bring such interest rates closer to the average. The Debt Affordability Advisory Committee shall use the Government Financial Officers Association checklist set forth in Appendix 1 hereto in planning and structuring any debt issuances. B. Financing Team. The County employs outside financial specialists to assist it in developing a debt issuance strategy, preparing bond documents and marketing bonds to investors. The key team members in the County’s financing transactions include its financial advisor and outside bond and disclosure counsel, the underwriter and County representatives (the County Auditor-Controller, Treasurer-Tax Collector, and the County Finance Director, among others). Other outside firms, such as those providing paying agent/registrar, trustee, credit enhancement, verification, escrow, auditing, or printing services, are retained as required. The County will issue Requests for Qualifications (RFQs) for financial advisor, bond counsel, disclosure counsel and tax counsel every three years The financing team shall meet at least semi-annually to review the overall financing strategy of the County and make recommendations to the County Administrator.   C. Term of Debt Repayment. Borrowings by the County shall mature over a term that does not exceed the economic life of the improvements that they finance and usually no longer than 20 years, unless special structuring elements require a specific maximum term to maturity, as is the case with pension obligation bonds. The County shall finance improvements with a probable useful life less than five years using pay-go funding for such needs. Bonds sold for the purchase of equipment with a probable useful life exceeding five years are repaid over a term that does not exceed such useful life.   D. Legal Borrowing Limitations/Bonds and other indebtedness. California Government Code Section 29909 limits General Obligation Bond indebtedness to five percent of the total assessed valuation of all taxable real and personal property within the County, excluding Public Financing Authority lease revenue bonds, Public Facility Corporation certificates of participation, Private Activity Bond, Mello-Roos special tax, and Assessment District Debt for which no legal limitations are currently in effect. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 382       4 E. Debt Features.   1. Original issue discount or premium. The County’s bonds may be sold at a discount or premium, in order to achieve effective marketing, achieve interest cost savings or meet other financing objectives. The maximum permitted discount is stated in the Notice of Sale accompanying the County’s preliminary official statement on the Bond Purchase Agreement, as applicable.   2. Debt service structure/Level Debt Service. The County shall primarily finance its long-lived municipal improvements over a 20-year term or less, on a level debt service basis. This policy minimizes long-run impact on a funding department’s budget. The County will seek to continue this practice, unless general fund revenues are projected to be insufficient to provide adequately for this debt service structure.   3. Call provisions. The County shall seek to minimize the protection from optional redemption given to bondholders, consistent with its desire to obtain the lowest possible interest rates on its bonds. The County’s tax-exempt bonds are generally subject to optional redemption. The County seeks early calls at low or no premiums because such features will allow it to refinance debt more easily for debt service savings when interest rates drop. The County and its financial advisor shall evaluate optional redemption provisions for each issue to assure that the County does not pay unacceptably higher interest rates to obtain such advantageous calls. The County shall not sell derivative call options.   4. Interest rates. The County shall first consider the use of fixed-rate debt to finance it capital needs, except for short-term needs (such as short-lived assets) that will be repaid or refinanced in the near term; and may consider variable rate debt under favorable conditions. F. Other Obligations Classified as Debt/Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB)/Vested Vacation Benefits. OPEBs and vacation benefits are earned by County employees based on time in service. The County records these vacation benefits as earned in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles as established by the Governmental Accounting Board (GASB). The liability for the benefit is recorded on the Fund level financial statements. The expense is recorded during the conversion to the Government Wide financial statements in accordance with GASB standards. For Enterprise funds the expense and liability are accrued in the respective funds. In this initial policy, the amount of OPEB and vacation benefits will not be in measures used to evaluate the County’s debt affordability. However, the County’s net OPEB obligation is posted to the County’s balance sheet. V. METHOD OF SALE. The County will select a method of sale that is the most appropriate in light of financial, market, transaction-specific and County-related conditions, and explain the rationale for its decision.   A. Competitive Sales. Debt obligations are generally issued through a competitive sale. The County and its financial advisor will set the terms of the sale to encourage as many bidders as possible. By maximizing bidding, the County seeks to obtain the lowest possible interest rates on its bonds. Some of the conditions that generally favor a competitive sale include:   1. the market is familiar with the County; 2. the County is a stable and regular borrower in the public market; 3. there is an active secondary market with a broad investor base for the County’s bonds; 4. the issue has a non-enhanced credit rating of A or above or can obtain credit enhancement prior to the competitive sale; 5. the debt structure is backed by the County’s full faith and credit or a strong, known or historically performing revenue stream; 6. the issue is neither too large to be easily absorbed by the market nor too small to attract March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 383       5 investors without a concerted sale effort; 7. the issue does not include complex or innovative features or require explanation as to the bonds’ security; 8. the issue can be sold and closed on a schedule that does not need to be accelerated or shortened for market or policy reasons; and 9. interest rates are stable, market demand is strong, and the market is able to absorb a reasonable amount of buying or selling at reasonable price changes.   B. Negotiated Sales. When certain conditions favorable for a competitive sale do not exist and when a negotiated sale will provide significant benefits to the County that would not be achieved through a competitive sale, the County may elect to sell its debt obligations through a private placement or negotiated sale, upon approval by the County Board of Supervisors. Such determination shall be made on an issue-by- issue basis, for a series of issues, or for part or all of a specific financing program. The following practices are recommended to be observed in the event of a negotiated sale:   1. ensure fairness by using a competitive underwriter selection process through a request for proposals where multiple proposals are considered; 2. remain actively involved in each step of the negotiation and sale processes to uphold the public trust; 3. ensure that either an employee of the County, or an outside professional other than the issue underwriter, who is familiar with and abreast of the condition of the municipal market, is available to assist in structuring the issue, pricing, and monitoring sales activities; 4. require that the financial advisor used for a particular bond issue not act as underwriter of the same bond issue; 5. require that financial professionals disclose the name or names of any person or firm, including attorneys, lobbyists and public relations professionals compensated in connection with a specific bond issue; 6. request all financial professionals submitting joint proposals or intending to enter into joint accounts or any fee-splitting arrangements in connection with a bond issue to fully disclose to the County any plan or arrangements to share tasks, responsibilities and fees earned, and disclose the financial professionals with whom the sharing is proposed, the method used to calculate the fees to be earned, and any changes thereto; and 7. review the “Agreement among Underwriters” and insure that it is filed with the County and that it governs all transactions during the underwriting period. VI. REFINANCING OF OUTSTANDING DEBT. The County may undertake refinancings of outstanding debt under the following circumstances:   A. Debt Service Savings. The County may refinance outstanding long-term debt when such refinancing allows the County to realize significant debt service savings (2% minimum by maturity and a minimum 4% savings overall ) without lengthening the term of refinanced debt and without increasing debt service in any subsequent fiscal year. The County may also consider debt refinancing when a primary objective would be the elimination of restrictive covenants that limit County operations. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 384       6 B. Defeasance. The County may refinance outstanding debt, either by advance refunding to the first call or by defeasance to maturity, when the public policy benefits of replacing such debt outweigh the costs associated with new issuance as well as any increase in annual debt service.   VII. CREDIT RATINGS   A. Rating Agency Relationships. The Senior Deputy County Administrator/Finance Manager is responsible for maintaining relationships with the rating agencies that assign ratings to the County’s various debt obligations. This effort includes providing periodic updates on the County’s general financial condition along with coordinating meetings and presentations in conjunction with a new debt issuance.   B. Quality of Ratings. The County shall request ratings prior to the sale of securities from each of two major rating agencies for municipal bond public issues. Currently these agencies are Moody’s Investors Service and Standard & Poor’s Corporation. The County shall provide a written and/or oral presentation to the rating agencies to help each credit analyst make an informed evaluation. The County shall make every reasonable effort to maintain its Aa implied general obligation bond credit ratings.     VIII. MANAGEMENT PRACTICES. The County has instituted sound management practices and will continue to follow practices that will reflect positively on it in the rating process. Among these are the County development of and adherence to long-term financial and capital improvement plans, management of expense growth in line with revenues and maintenance of an adequate level of operating reserves.   A. Formal Fiscal Policies. The County shall continue to establish, refine, and follow formal fiscal policies such as: Investment Policy, General Fund Reserve Policy, Budget Policy, and this Debt Management Policy.   B. Rebate Reporting and Covenant Compliance The Senior Deputy County Administrator/Finance Manager is responsible for maintaining a system of record keeping and reporting to meet the arbitrage rebate compliance requirements of the federal tax code and/or contracting for such service. This effort includes tracking investment earnings on debt proceeds, calculating rebate payments in compliance with tax law, and remitting any rebatable earnings to the federal government in a timely manner in order to preserve the tax- exempt status of the County’s outstanding debt issues. Additionally, general financial reporting and certification requirements embodied in bond covenants are monitored to ensure that all covenants are complied with.   C. Reporting Practices. The County will comply with the standards of the Government Finance Officers Association for financial reporting and budget presentation and the disclosure requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission.   D. Post-Issuance Compliance Procedures. To assure it manages its debt obligations in accordance with all federal tax requirements, the County will comply with the Post-Issuance Compliance Procedures set forth in Appendix 2 hereto. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 385 APPENDIX 1 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION Checklist of Debt Policy Considerations 1. How long is the capital planning period? 2. Have all non-debt sources of funds been considered? 3. How are borrowing plans reviewed internally? 4. What level of debt is manageable in order to maintain or improve the government’s credit quality? 5. How much “pay-as-you-go” financing should be included in the capital plan? 6. How much short-term borrowing will be undertaken, including both operating and capital borrowings? 7. How much debt will be issued in the form of variable-rate securities? 8. How does the redemption schedule for each proposed issue affect the overall debt service requirements of the government? 9. What types of affordability guidelines will be established to help monitor and preserve credit quality? 10. What provisions have been made to periodically review the capital plan and borrowing practices? 11. What is the overlapping debt burden on the taxpayer? 12. How will the formal debt policies be integrated into the capital planning and funding process? March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 386 Appendix 2    Page 1 of 3    County of Contra Costa Post-Issuance Tax Compliance Procedures For Tax-Exempt and Build America Bonds The purpose of these Post-Issuance Tax Compliance Procedures is to establish policies and procedures in connection with tax-exempt bonds and “Build America bonds” (“Bonds”) issued by the County of Contra Costa and the County of Contra Costa Financing Authority (together, the “County”) so as to ensure that the County complies with all applicable post-issuance requirements of federal income tax law needed to preserve the tax-exempt or Build America bond status of the Bonds. General Ultimate responsibility for all matters relating to County financings and refundings, other than Tax and Revenue Anticipation Notes (“TRANs”), rests with the County Administrator (the “Administrator”). The County Treasurer and County Auditor-Controller are responsible for tax compliance with respect to TRANs. Post-Issuance Compliance Requirements Timely Reporting of Final Sale The Administrator and other appropriate County personnel shall file timely any report required by state and federal regulatory agencies notifying those agencies of final sale of bonds, or receipt bank loan/private placement proceeds, as required by law. As of this writing, this section applies to the following: 1. California Debt and Investment Advisory Commission (CDIAC)  Report of Final Sale: This Reports details information about the issuer and the bond issuance. The report requires attachment of the Official Statement related to the transaction or other bond documents in the case of a bank loan/private placement. The report is required to be filed within 21 days of closing, pursuant to Government Code § 8855(j). o Special Requirement for Refunding Bonds sold via Negotiated Sale or Private Placement: In addition to the Report of Final Sale above, if refunding bonds are sold through a negotiated sale or private placement, CDIAC requires submission of a written statement explaining the reasons for not selling those bonds at a public sale within 14 days of closing, pursuant to Government Code § 53583(c)(2)(B). 2. Internal Revenue Service (IRS)  IRS Form 8038-G “Information Return for Tax-Exempt Governmental Obligations”: This filing details information about the issuer and tax-exempt governmental obligations over $100,000. The report is required to be filed no later than the 15th day of the second calendar month after the close of the calendar quarter in which the bond was issued, pursuant to Internal Revenue Code § 149(e). External Advisors / Documentation The Administrator and other appropriate County personnel shall consult with bond counsel and other legal counsel and advisors, as needed, throughout the Bond issuance process to identify requirements and to establish procedures necessary or appropriate so that the Bonds will continue to qualify for the appropriate tax status. Those requirements and procedures shall be documented in a County resolution(s), Tax Certificate(s) and / or other documents finalized at or before issuance of the Bonds. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 387 Appendix 2    Page 2 of 3    Those requirements and procedures shall including future compliance with applicable arbitrage rebate requirements and all other applicable post-issuance requirements of federal tax law throughout (and in some cases beyond) the term of the Bonds. The Administrator and other appropriate County personnel also shall consult with bond counsel and other legal counsel and advisors, as needed, following issuance of the Bonds to ensure that all applicable post- issuance requirements in fact are met. This shall include, without limitation, consultation in connection with future contracts with respect to the use of Bond-financed assets and future contracts with respect to the use of output or throughput of Bond-financed assets. Whenever necessary or appropriate, the County shall engage expert advisors (each a “Rebate Service Provider”) to assist in the calculation of arbitrage rebate payable in respect of the investment of Bond proceeds. Role of the County as Bond Issuer Unless otherwise provided by County resolutions, unexpended Bond proceeds shall be held by the County, and the investment of Bond proceeds shall be managed by the [Administrator]. The Administrator shall maintain records and shall prepare regular, periodic statements to the County regarding the investments and transactions involving Bond proceeds. If a County resolution provides for Bond proceeds to be administered by a trustee, the trustee shall provide regular, periodic (monthly) statements regarding the investments and transactions involving Bond proceeds. Arbitrage Rebate and Yield Unless a Tax Certificate documents that bond counsel has advised that arbitrage rebate will not be applicable to an issue of Bonds:  the County shall engage the services of a Rebate Service Provider, and the County or the Bond trustee shall deliver periodic statements concerning the investment of Bond proceeds to the Rebate Service Provider on a prompt basis;  upon request, the Administrator and other appropriate County personnel shall provide to the Rebate Service Provider additional documents and information reasonably requested by the Rebate Service Provider;  the Administrator and other appropriate County personnel shall monitor efforts of the Rebate Service Provider and assure payment of required rebate amounts, if any, no later than 60 days after each 5- year anniversary of the issue date of the Bonds, and no later than 60 days after the last Bond of each issue is redeemed; and  during the construction period of each capital project financed in whole or in part by Bonds, the Administrator and other appropriate County personnel shall monitor the investment and expenditure of Bond proceeds and shall consult with the Rebate Service Provider to determine compliance with any applicable exceptions from the arbitrage rebate requirements during each 6-month spending period up to 6 months, 18 months or 24 months, as applicable, following the issue date of the Bonds. The County shall retain copies of all arbitrage reports and trustee statements as described below under “Record Keeping Requirements”. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 388 Appendix 2    Page 3 of 3    Use of Bond Proceeds The Administrator and other appropriate County personnel shall:  monitor the use of Bond proceeds, the use of Bond-financed assets (e.g., facilities, furnishings or equipment) and the use of output or throughput of Bond-financed assets throughout the term of the Bonds (and in some cases beyond the term of the Bonds) to ensure compliance with covenants and restrictions set forth in applicable County resolutions and Tax Certificates;  maintain records identifying the assets or portion of assets that are financed or refinanced with proceeds of each issue of Bonds;  consult with Bond Counsel and other professional expert advisers in the review of any contracts or arrangements involving use of Bond-financed facilities to ensure compliance with all covenants and restrictions set forth in applicable County resolutions and Tax Certificates;  maintain records for any contracts or arrangements involving the use of Bond-financed facilities as might be necessary or appropriate to document compliance with all covenants and restrictions set forth in applicable County resolutions and Tax Certificates;  meet at least annually with personnel responsible for Bond-financed assets to identify and discuss any existing or planned use of Bond-financed, assets or output or throughput of Bond-financed assets, to ensure that those uses are consistent with all covenants and restrictions set forth in applicable County resolutions and Tax Certificates. All relevant records and contracts shall be maintained as described below. Record Keeping Requirements Unless otherwise specified in applicable County resolutions or Tax Certificates, the County shall maintain the following documents for the term of each issue of Bonds (including refunding Bonds, if any) plus at least three years:  a copy of the Bond closing transcript(s) and other relevant documentation delivered to the County at or in connection with closing of the issue of Bonds;  a copy of all material documents relating to capital expenditures financed or refinanced by Bond proceeds, including (without limitation) construction contracts, purchase orders, invoices, trustee requisitions and payment records, as well as documents relating to costs reimbursed with Bond proceeds and records identifying the assets or portion of assets that are financed or refinanced with Bond proceeds;  a copy of all contracts and arrangements involving private use of Bond-financed assets or for the private use of output or throughput of Bond-financed assets; and  copies of all records of investments, investment agreements, arbitrage reports and underlying documents, including trustee statements. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 389       APPENDIX 3 COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA CONTINUING DISCLOSURE PROCEDURES ARTICLE I - DEFINITIONS …………………………………………........................................................ 3 ARTICLE II - GENERAL PRINCIPLES.................................................................................................. 4 ARTICLE III - DISCLOSURE REPRESENTATIVES AND DISCLOSURE COORDINATORS…...... 5 Section 1. Appointment of Disclosure Representative......................................................................... 5 Section 2. Duties of the Disclosure Representative............................................................................ 5 Section 3. Appointment of Disclosure Coordinator. ........................................................................... 5 Section 4. Duties of the Disclosure Coordinator. ................................................................................ 5 ARTICLE IV - LISTED EVENTS REQUIREMENTS ............................................................................. 6 Section 1. General. .............................................................................................................................. 6 Section 2. Listed Events for Bonds Issued Prior to December 1, 2010. ............................................. 6 Section 3. Listed Events for Bonds Issued on and after December 1, 2010. ...................................... 7 ARTICLE V - ANNUAL REPORT REQUIREMENTS ............................................................................ 8 ARTICLE VI - FILING AND NOTICE REQUIREMENTS ....................................................................... 8 Section 1. Annual Reports and Event Notices. .................................................................................... 8 Section 2. California Debt and Investment Advisory Commission..................................................... 9 Section 3. Required Notices. ................................................................................................................ 9 ARTICLE VII - VOLUNTARY DISCLOSURES ........................................................................................... 9 ARTICLE VIII - DOCUMENT RETENTION POLICY.............................................................................. 9 Exhibit A: County and Authority Outstanding Debt ...................................................................... A-1 Exhibit B: Required Information for Annual Reports for County and Authority........................... B-1 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 390 2    ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS The following capitalized terms shall have the following meanings in these Procedures: “Agency” shall mean the Successor Agency to the former Redevelopment Agency of Contra Costa County. “Annual Report” shall mean any annual report to be filed by the County or the Authority in connection with its obligations under any Continuing Disclosure Certificate executed in accordance with Rule 15c2-12 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. “Auditor-Controller” shall mean the Auditor-Controller of the County of Contra Costa. “Authority” shall mean the Contra Costa County Public Financing Authority, a joint exercise of powers authority of which the County of Contra Costa and the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District are members. “Board of Supervisors” shall mean the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa. “Bonds” shall mean any bonds, certificates of participation, notes or any other evidence of indebtedness issued by or on behalf of the County or the Authority which is subject to Rule 15c2-12. “Bond Insurer” shall mean an issuer of a financial guaranty insurance or municipal bond insurance policy guaranteeing the scheduled payment of principal of and interest on an outstanding issue of Bonds when due. “CDIAC” shall mean the California Debt and Investment Advisory Commission. “Continuing Disclosure Certificate” shall mean each continuing disclosure certificate, undertaking or agreement executed and delivered by the County or the Authority in connection with an issue of Bonds. “County” shall mean the County of Contra Costa, a political subdivision of the State of California. “County Counsel” shall mean an attorney within the Office of the County Counsel of the County of Contra Costa, California. “County Finance Director” shall mean the County Finance Director of the County of Contra Costa in the County Administrator’s Office. “Credit Facility Provider” shall mean a bank providing a direct-pay letter of credit or other security or liquidity instrument in connection with an issue of Bonds which secures the payment of the principal or purchase price, if any, of and interest on an outstanding issue of Bonds when due. “Disclosure Coordinator” shall mean the person or persons designated by a Disclosure Representative to assist in taking such action necessary or desirable to comply with the terms of the Continuing Disclosure Certificates, as provided in Article III hereof. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 391 3    “Debt Affordability Advisory Committee” shall mean a committee composed of the Auditor- Controller, Treasurer-Tax Collector, Director of Conservation and Development and the County Finance Director that advise the County Administrator on debt management issues. “Director of Conservation and Development” shall mean the Director of the Department of Conservation and Development of the County of Contra Costa. “Disclosure Counsel” shall mean a firm of nationally recognized standing in matters pertaining to the disclosure obligations under Rule 15c2-12 of the Securities and Exchange Commission of the United States of America, duly admitted to the practice of law before the highest court of any state of the United States of America. “Disclosure Representative” shall mean the County Administrator, Director of Conservation and Development and County Finance Director who are collectively responsible for compliance with the terms of the Continuing Disclosure Certificates, as provided in Article III. “EMMA” shall mean the MSRB’s Electronic Municipal Market Access system or any other successor thereto as designated by the SEC or the MSRB. “Event Notice” shall mean any notice of the occurrence of a Material Event or Listed Event. “Listed Event” shall mean any event described in Section 3 of Article IV hereof. “Material Event” shall mean any event described in Section 2 of Article IV hereof. “MSRB” shall mean Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board. “Official Statement” shall mean any Preliminary Official Statement, final Official Statement or any other disclosure document that the County or t h e Au t h o r i t y prepared in connection with the issuance and sale of any Bonds. “Paying Agent” shall mean any bank, trust company, banking association or financial institution appointed to perform the functions of a paying agent for an issue of Bonds. “Procedures” shall mean these Continuing Disclosure Procedures. “Rating Agency” shall mean ea ch of Moody’s Investor’s Service and Standard & Poor’s Rating Services or any other nationally recognized statistical rating organization registered with the SEC. “Rule 15c2-12” shall mean Rule 15c2-12(b)(5) adopted by the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as the same may be amended from time to time. “SEC” shall mean the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. “Treasurer-Tax Collector” shall mean the Treasurer - Tax Collector of the County of Contra Costa. “Trustee” shall mean the bank, trust company, national banking association or other financial institution appointed as a trustee for an issue of Bonds. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 392 4    ARTICLE II GENERAL PRINCIPLES The County is committed to complete and accurate market disclosure in accordance with the disclosure requirements under the federal securities laws, including rules and regulations promulgated by the SEC and the MSRB. In order to achieve this objective and, in accordance therewith, these Procedures are approved by the Board of Supervisors, as recommended by the Debt Affordability Advisory Committee (DAAC), and may be amended and supplemented from time to time as necessary or desirable as SEC and MSRB rules are amended, as Bonds mature, or are redeemed, and as Bonds that are subject to Rule 15c2-12 are issued. ARTICLE III DISCLOSURE REPRESENTATIVES AND DISCLOSURE COORDINATORS Section 1. Appointment of Disclosure Representatives . The County Administrator, Director of Conservation and Development and County Finance Director are appointed as Disclosure Representatives to fulfill the duties set forth in Section 2 of this Article III. Section 2. Duties of the Disclosure Representatives. (A) The Disclosure Representatives shall: (i) monitor and maintain compliance by the County with its respective Continuing Disclosure Certificates and these Procedures; (ii) serve as the main contact for each Disclosure Coordinator to communicate issues and information that may be included in an Event Notice or an Annual Report; (iii) review all proposed Listed Event Notices, Annual Reports and other filings with the EMMA system and filings for Bond Insurers, Credit Facility Providers, Paying Agents, Rating Agencies, Trustees and CDIAC; (iv) confer with County Counsel and Disclosure Counsel regarding the County’s continuing disclosure undertakings and procedures; (v) maintain the lists attached as Exhibits A and B; (vi) direct the Disclosure Coordinators to file any required documents; and (vii) take such other action as may be necessary or useful to achieve the objectives of these Procedures and to comply with all applicable federal securities laws. Section 3. Appointment of Disclosure Coordinator. The Disclosure Representatives shall appoint one or more Disclosure Coordinators from time to time to fulfill the duties set forth in Section 4 of this Article III. The Disclosure Coordinators may work with employees in various County or Authority offices and departments in order to effectively comply with the objectives of these Procedures. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 393 5    Section 4. Duties of the Disclosure Coordinator. (A) The Disclosure Coordinator shall: (i) file any documents as directed by the Disclosure Representative; (ii) serve as a contact for County staff to communicate issues and information that may be included in an Event Notice or an Annual Report; (iii) maintain correspondence regarding possible Listed Events; (iv) keep informed regarding all of the County’s public disclosures, including disclosures to the Bond Insurers, the Credit Facility Providers, the Rating Agencies, the Trustees and CDIAC; (v) document the County’s continuing disclosure filings by retaining the documents set forth in Article VIII hereof; and (vi) take such other action as may be necessary or useful to achieve the objectives of these Procedures and to comply with all applicable federal securities laws. (B) In addition to the duties set forth above in clause (A), the Disclosure Coordinator shall review the Listed Events regularly to determine whether an event has occurred that may require a filing of an Event Notice. The Disclosure Coordinator shall regularly check the websites of and subscribe to communications (e.g., news alerts, press releases, etc.) from each Rating Agency, Bond Insurer or Credit Facility Provider in order to be aware of any Rating Change as described in the Continuing Disclosure Certificates. The Disclosure Coordinator shall contact relevant County staff on a regular basis to ascertain whether any events have occurred which would constitute Listed Events under the Continuing Disclosure Certificates. ARTICLE IV LISTED EVENTS REQUIREMENTS Section 1. General. The Continuing Disclosure Certificates entered into by the County or the Authority with respect to Bonds issued prior to December 1, 2010 require Event Notices to be filed upon the occurrence of any event listed in Section 2 of Article IV hereof, if material. Any such Event Notice shall be filed “in a timely manner”. The Continuing Disclosure Certificates entered into by the County or Authority with respect to Bonds issued on or after December 1, 2010 require Event Notices to be filed upon the occurrence of any event listed in Section 3 of Article IV hereof no later than 10 business days after the occurrence of such Listed Event. Section 2. Listed Events for Bonds Issued Prior to December 1, 2010. For Bonds issued prior to December 1, 2010, pursuant to the provisions of the applicable Continuing Disclosure Certificate, the County or Authority shall give, or cause to be given, notice of the occurrence of any of the following events with respect to the outstanding obligation, if material, in a timely manner: March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 394 6    (i) principal and interest payment delinquencies; (ii) non-payment related defaults; (iii) unscheduled draws on debt service reserves reflecting financial difficulties; (iv) unscheduled draws on any credit enhancements reflecting financial difficulties; (v) substitution of any credit or liquidity providers, or their failure to perform; (vi) adverse tax opinions or events affecting the tax-exempt status of the securities; (vii) modifications to the rights of security holders; (viii) bond calls; (ix) defeasances; (x) release, substitution, or sale of property securing repayment of the securities; and (xi) rating changes. Section 3. Listed Events for Bonds Issued on and after December 1, 2010. For Bonds issued on or after to December 1, 2010, pursuant to the provisions of the applicable Continuing Disclosure Certificate, the County or Authority shall give, or cause to be given, notice of the occurrence of any of the following Listed Events within ten (10) business days of the occurrence thereof: (i) principal and interest payment delinquencies; (ii) non-payment related defaults, if material; (iii) unscheduled draws on debt service reserves reflecting financial difficulties; (iv) unscheduled draws on credit enhancements reflecting financial difficulties; (v) substitution of credit or liquidity providers, or their failure to perform; (vi) adverse tax opinions, the issuance by the Internal Revenue Service of proposed or final determinations of taxability, Notices of Proposed Issue (IRS Form 5701-TEB) or other material notices or determinations with respect to the tax status of the security, or other material events affecting the tax status of the security; (vii) modifications to rights of security holders, if material; (viii) bond calls, if material, and tender offers; (ix) defeasances; (x) release, substitution, or sale of property securing repayment of the securities, if material; March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 395 7    (xi) rating changes; (xii) bankruptcy, insolvency, receivership or similar event of the obligated person (Note: For the purposes of this event, the event is considered to occur when any of the following occur: The appointment of a receiver, fiscal agent or similar officer for an obligated person in a proceeding under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code or in any other proceeding under state or federal law in which a court or governmental authority has assumed jurisdiction over substantially all of the assets or business of the obligated person, or if such jurisdiction has been assumed by leaving the existing governing body and officials or officers in possession but subject to the supervision and orders of a court or governmental authority, or the entry of an order confirming a plan of reorganization, arrangement or liquidation by a court or governmental authority having supervision or jurisdiction over substantially all of the assets or business of the obligated person); (xiii) the consummation of a merger, consolidation, or acquisition involving an obligated person or the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the obligated person, other than in the ordinary course of business, the entry into a definitive agreement to undertake such an action or the termination of a definitive agreement relating to any such actions, other than pursuant to its terms, if material; (xiv) appointment of a successor or additional trustee or the change of name of a trustee, if material. ARTICLE V ANNUAL REPORT REQUIREMENTS Pursuant to the various Continuing Disclosure Certificates, the County and the Authority must provide its respective Annual Report with respect to an issue of Bonds by the date set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto. The Disclosure Coordinator shall commence collection of information for each Annual Report at such time as determined necessary or useful in order to timely complete and file the Annual Report. The Disclosure Coordinator shall obtain any information necessary to be included in an Annual Report that is not included in the County’s audited financial statements. The Annual Report shall include the financial information and other operating data set forth in the respective Continuing Disclosure Certificate as summarized in Exhibit B attached hereto. In accordance with the Continuing Disclosure Certificates, if audited financial statements are not available by the date the Annual Report is required to be filed, unaudited financial statements are to be included in such Annual Reports and audited financial statements shall be filed when such statements become available. In addition, the Continuing Disclosure Certificates require the County to file a notice of any failure to provide its Annual Report, on or before the date specified in a Continuing Disclosure Certificate. ARTICLE VI FILING AND NOTICE REQUIREMENTS Section 1. Annual Reports and Event Notices. The Disclosure Representative shall file each Annual Report on such dates as provided in Exhibit B attached hereto and shall file each Event Notice as required pursuant to Article III hereof and March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 396 8    the related Continuing Disclosure Certificate. The Disclosure Representative shall submit all filings of Annual Reports and Listed Events through EMMA or any other repository so designated by the MSRB or the SEC, unless the County is otherwise advised by a written opinion of Disclosure Counsel. Section 2. California Debt and Investment Advisory Commission. The Disclosure Representative shall file each periodic report required to be prepared and filed with CDIAC as set forth in statute. Section 3. Required Notices. The Disclosure Representative shall file any notice required to be given to any Bond Insurer, Credit Facility Provider, Paying Agent, Rating Agency or Trustee as may be required from time to time. ARTICLE VII VOLUNTARY DISCLOSURES The County’s policy is to only file annual financial information and operating data and Event Notices that are required under the Continuing Disclosure Certificates and applicable federal securities laws. The Disclosure Representative may determine to file voluntary disclosure information that is not required under the Continuing Disclosure Certificates. ARTICLE VIII DOCUMENT RETENTION POLICY In accordance with Article III hereof, the Disclosure Coordinator shall maintain the following materials for a period ending 5 years after the final maturity of an issue of Bonds: A. Continuing Disclosure Certificate; B. Annual Reports, including any EMMA transmittal letters and EMMA filing receipts; C. Event Notices, including any EMMA transmittal letters and EMMA filing receipts; D. CDIAC transmittal letters and filing receipts; E. Rating reports; and F. Such other information as the Disclosure Representative determines necessary or useful in accordance with the Continuing Disclosure Certificates. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 397 EXHIBIT A: COUNTY AND AUTHORITY OUTSTANDING DEBTas of August 25, 2015Name of IssueIssuing Entity Principal Amount Date of IssueFinal Maturity DateCUSIP for Final MaturityTrustee or Paying AgentAnnual Report Due DateDisclosure RepresentativeDisclosure CoordinatorLease Revenue Bonds/Obligations:Lease Revenue Bonds, 2015 Series A (Capital Projects) and 2015 Series B (Refunding)County of Contra Costa Public Financing Authority $           71,150,000 8/25/20156/1/2035 (A) 6/1/2028 (B)21226PLV8 (A) 21226PMJ4 (B)Wells Fargo3/31County Finance DirectorSr. Deputy CAOLease Revenue Obligations (Capital Projects Program) 2012 Series A, $13,102,304 ***Private Placement***County of Contra Costa Public Financing Authority13,102,304$           10/11/2012 6/1/2027 N/AWells FargoN/ACounty Finance DirectorSr. Deputy CAOLease Revenue Bonds, $58,055,000 comprised of Capital Project I ‐ Tax Exempt Bonds, Series A‐1, $6,790,000 and Capital Project I ‐ Taxable Build America Bonds, Series A‐2, $13,130,000 and Capital Project I ‐ Taxable Recovery Zone Bonds, Series A‐3, $20,700,000 and 2010 Series B (Refunding), $17,435,000County of Contra Costa Public Financing Authority58,055,000$           11/16/20106/1/2020 (A‐1) 6/1/2030 (A‐2) 6/1/2040 (A‐3) 6/1/2025 (B)21226PJR0 (A‐1) 21226PKU1 (A‐2) 21226PKE7 (A‐3) 21226PKV9 (B)Wells Fargo3/31County Finance DirectorSr. Deputy CAOLease Revenue Bonds (Capital Projects Program) 2009 Series A, $25,061,614.90 ***Private Placement***County of Contra Costa Public Financing Authority25,061,615$           6/1/2009 6/1/2024 N/AWells FargoN/ACounty Finance DirectorSr. Deputy CAOLease Revenue Bonds, $232,330,000 consisting of (Refunding and Various Capital Projects), 2007 Series A, $122,065,000 and (Medical Center Refunding) , 2007 Series B, $110,265,000County of Contra Costa Public Financing Authority232,330,000$         3/14/2007 (A) 8/7/2007 (B)6/1/2028 (A) 6/1/2018 (B)21226PHB7 (A) 21226PHN1 (B)Wells Fargo3/31County Finance DirectorSr. Deputy CAOPension Obligation BondsCalifornia Taxable Pension Obligation Bonds, Series 2003A, $322,710,000Contra Costa County322,710,000$         5/1/2003 8/1/2022 212257BV0Wells Fargo3/31County Finance DirectorSr. Deputy CAOTax Allocation Bonds:2007 Tax Allocation Revenue Bonds (Contra Costa Centre, North Richmond, Bay Point, Rodeo and Montalvin Manor Project Areas), Series A, $62,205,000, 2007 Taxable Tax Allocation Revenue Bonds (North Richmond, Bay Point, Rodeo and Montalvin Manor Project Areas), Series A‐T, $25,500,000 and 2007 Tax Allocation Revenue Bonds (Contra Costa Centre, North Richmond, Bay Point, Rodeo and Montalvin Manor Project Areas), Series B, $16,665,000County of Contra Costa Public Financing Authority104,370,000$         6/13/20078/1/2037 (A) 8/1/2037 (A‐T) 8/1/2035 (B)212262HQ5 (A) 212262JP5 (A‐T) 212262KM0 (B)US Bank 3/31DCD DirectorCommunity Dev. Bond Program Mgr.Tax Allocation Revenue Bonds (Multiple Project Areas), Series 2003A, $43,345,000, (Multiple Project Areas‐Housing Set Aside Revenues), Series 2003B, $2,445,000County of Contra Costa Public Financing Authority45,790,000$           9/11/20038/1/2033 (A) 8/1/2033 (B)212262DW6 (A) 212262FN4 (B)US Bank 3/31DCD DirectorCommunity Dev. Bond Program Mgr.A‐1March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes398 Name of IssueIssuing Entity Principal Amount Date of IssueFinal Maturity DateCUSIP for Final MaturityTrustee or Paying AgentAnnual Report Due DateDisclosure RepresentativeDisclosure CoordinatorTax Allocation Revenue Bonds (Pleasant Hill BART, North Richmond, Bay Point, Oakley and Rodeo Redevelopment Project Areas), Series 1999, $44,615,000County of Contra Costa Public Financing Authority44,615,000$           5/1/1999 8/1/2028 212262CE7 US Bank 3/31DCD DirectorCommunity Dev. Bond Program Mgr.Special Assessment Districts2013 Special Tax Refunding Bonds (Norris Canyon), $5,605,000County of Contra Costa Community Facilities District No. 2001‐15,605,000$             1/24/2013 9/1/2031 212288CT9BNY Mellon3/31DCD DirectorCommunity Dev. Bond Program Mgr.2001 Revenue Bonds (Reassessment District of 2001), $6,575,000County of Contra Costa Public Financing Authority6,575,000$             6/21/2001 9/2/2016 212261BD2BNY Mellon3/31County Finance DirectorSr. Deputy CAO1998 Special Tax Refunding Bonds (Pleasant Hill BART Station Area), $4,785,000County of Contra Costa Community Facilities District No. 1991‐14,785,000$             5/12/1998 8/1/2016 212288BD5 US Bank 3/31DCD DirectorCommunity Dev. Bond Program Mgr.A‐2March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes399 - B-1 - EXHIBIT B: REQUIRED INFORMATION FOR ANNUAL REPORTS OF COUNTY AND AUTHORITY Issue Description Due Date Filing Requirements Lease Revenue Bonds: County of Contra Costa Public Financing Authority Lease Revenue Bonds, $71,115,000 consisting of $19,055,000 2015 Series A (Capital Projects) and $52,060,000 2015 Series B (Refunding) Nine months after FYE 6/30 (3/31) (a) The audited financial statements of the County for the prior fiscal year, prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles as promulgated to apply to governmental entities from time to time by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board. If the County’s audited financial statements are not available by the time the Annual Report is required to be filed pursuant to Section 3(a), the Annual Report shall contain unaudited financial statements in a format similar to the financial statements contained in the final Official Statement, and the audited financial statements shall be filed in the same manner as the Annual Report when they become available. (b) Numerical and tabular information for the immediately preceding Fiscal Year of the type contained in the Official Statement under the following captions: 1. The status of the construction and installation of the improvement constituting the 2015 Project, until such time as the 2015 Project is completed; 2. Report of changes in “DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE;” 3. Table B-1–“County of Contra Costa General Fund Budget Summary;” 4. Table B-2–“County of Contra Costa Summary of Secured Assessed Valuations and Ad Valorem Property Taxation;” 5. Table B-5–“County of Contra Costa General Fund Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances;” 6. Table B-8–“Contra Costa County Employees’ Retirement Association Schedule of Funded Status;” 7. Table B-16–“Contra Costa County Other Post Employment Benefit Plan Summary of Contributions;” and 8. Table B-19–“Contra Costa County Outstanding Lease Revenue Obligations and Pension Obligation Bonds”). County of Contra Costa Public Financing Authority Lease Revenue Bonds, $58,055,000 consisting of $6,790,000 2010 Series A-1 (Capital Project I – Tax Exempt Bonds); $13,130,000 2010 Series A-2 (Capital Project I – Taxable Build America bonds); $20,700,000 2010 Series A-3 (Capital Project I – Taxable Recovery Zone Bonds); and $17,435,000 2010 Series B (Refunding) Nine months after FYE 6/30 (3/31) (a) The audited financial statements of the County for the prior fiscal year, prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles as promulgated to apply to governmental entities from time to time by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board. If the County’s audited financial statements are not available by the time the Annual Report is required to be filed pursuant to Section 3(a), the Annual Report shall contain unaudited financial statements in a format similar to the financial statements contained in the final Official Statement, and the audited financial statements shall be filed in the same manner as the Annual Report when they become available. (b) Numerical and tabular information for the immediately preceding Fiscal Year of the type contained in the Official Statement under the following captions: 1. The status of the construction and installation of the improvement constituting Capital Project I and Capital Project II until such time as each Capital Project has been completed; 2. Report of changes in “DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE;” 3. APPENDIX B–“COUNTY FINANCIAL INFORMATION–Recent County General Fund Budgets” (update Table B-1 “COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA GENERAL FUND BUDGET”); 4. APPENDIX B–“COUNTY FINANCIAL INFORMATION–Ad Valorem Property Taxes” (update Table B-2 “COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA SUMMARY OF SECURED ASSESSED VALUATIONS AND AD VALOREM PROPERTY TAXATION”); March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes400 - B-2 - EXHIBIT B: REQUIRED INFORMATION FOR ANNUAL REPORTS OF COUNTY AND AUTHORITY Issue Description Due Date Filing Requirements 5. APPENDIX B–“COUNTY FINANCIAL INFORMATION–Accounting Policies, Reports and Audits” (update Table B-6 “COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA GENERAL FUND STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES”); 6. APPENDIX B–“COUNTY FINANCIAL INFORMATION–Pension Plan” (update Table B-9 “CONTRA COSTA COUNTY EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT ASSOCIATOF FUNDED STATUS”); 7. APPENDIX B–“COUNTY FINANCIAL INFORMATION–Other Post-Employment Healthcare Benefits” (update Table B-16 “CONTRA COSTA COUNTY OTHER POST-EMPLOYMENT HEALTHCARE BENEFIT PLAN SUMMARY OF PARTICIPATING EMPLOYEES AND CONTRIBUTIONS”); 8. APPENDIX B–“COUNTY FINANCIAL INFORMATION–Long Term Obligations” (update Table B-22–“CONTRA COSTA COUNTY OUTSTANDING LEASE OBLIGATIONS AND PENSION OBLIGATION BONDS”). County of Contra Costa Public Financing Authority Lease Revenue Bonds, $232,330,000 consisting of (Refunding and Various Capital Projects), 2007 Series A, $122,065,000 and (Medical Center Refunding) , 2007 Series B, $110,265,000 Dated: March 14, 2007 Nine months after FYE 6/30 (3/31) (a) The audited financial statements of the County for the prior fiscal year, prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles as promulgated to apply to governmental entities from time to time by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board. If the County’s audited financial statements are not available by the time the Annual Report is required to be filed pursuant to Section 3(a), the Annual Report shall contain unaudited financial statements in a format similar to the financial statements contained in the final Official Statement, and the audited financial statements shall be filed in the same manner as the Annual Report when they become available. (b) Numerical and tabular information for the immediately preceding Fiscal Year of the type contained in the Official Statement under the following captions: 1. Report of changes in “DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE;” 2. APPENDIX B–“COUNTY FINANCIAL INFORMATION–Recent County General Fund Budgets” (update Table B-1 “COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA GENERAL FUND BUDGET”); 3. APPENDIX B–“COUNTY FINANCIAL INFORMATION–Ad Valorem Property Taxes” (update Table B-2 “COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA SUMMARY OF SECURED ASSESSED VALUATIONS AND AD VALOREM PROPERTY TAXATION”); 4. APPENDIX B–“COUNTY FINANCIAL INFORMATION–Accounting Policies, Reports and Audits” (update Table B-5 “COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA GENERAL FUND STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES”); 5. APPENDIX B–“COUNTY FINANCIAL INFORMATION–Pension Plan” (update Table B-12 “CONTRA COSTA COUNTY EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION SCHEDULE OF FUNDED STATUS”); 6. APPENDIX B–“COUNTY FINANCIAL INFORMATION–Long Term Obligations” (update Table B-23–“CONTRA COSTA COUNTY OUTSTANDING LEASE OBLIGATIONS AND PENSION OBLIGATION BONDS”). March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes401 - B-3 - EXHIBIT B: REQUIRED INFORMATION FOR ANNUAL REPORTS OF COUNTY AND AUTHORITY Issue Description Due Date Filing Requirements Pension Obligation Bonds: County of Contra Costa, California Taxable Pension Obligation Bonds, Series 2003A, $322,710,000 Dated: May 1, 2003 Nine months after FYE 6/30 (3/31) 1. The audited financial statements of the County for the prior fiscal year, prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles as promulgated to apply to governmental entities from time to time by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board. If the County's audited financial statements are not available by the time the Annual Report is required to be filed pursuant to Section 3(a), the Annual Report shall contain unaudited financial statements in a format similar to the financial statements contained in the final Official Statement, and the audited financial statements shall be filed in the same manner as the Annual Report when they become available 2. Numerical and tabular information for the immediately preceding Fiscal Year of the type contained in the Official Statement under the following captions: (a) “APPENDIX A – COUNTY ECONOMIC, DEMOGRAGHIC AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION – Recent County General Fund Budgets” (update table entitled “COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA GENERAL FUND BUDGET”); (b) “APPENDIX A – COUNTY ECONOMIC, DEMOGRAGHIC AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION – Ad Valorem Property taxes” (updated table entitled “COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA SUMMARY OF ASSESSED VALUATIONS AND AD VALOREM PROPERTY TAXATION”); (c) “APPENDIX A – COUNTY ECONOMIC, DEMOGRAGHIC AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION – Accounting Policies, Reports and Audits” (update table entitled “COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA GENERAL FUND SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES”); (d) “APPENDIX A – COUNTY ECONOMIC, DEMOGRAGHIC AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION – Long Term Obligations – General Obligation Debt” and “- Lease Obligations” (update table entitled “COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA OUTSTANDING MARKETABLE LEASE AND PENSION BOND OBLIGATIONS”) Tax Allocation Bonds: 2007 Tax Allocation Revenue Bonds (Contra Costa Centre, North Richmond, Bay Point, Rodeo and Manor Project Areas), Series A, $62,205,000, 2007 Taxable Tax Allocation Revenue Bonds (North Richmond, Bay Point, Rodeo and Montalvin Manor Project Areas), Series A-T, $25,500,000 and 2007 Tax Allocation Revenue Bonds (Contra Costa Centre, North Richmond, Bay Point, Rodeo and Montalvin Manor Project Areas), Series B, $16,665,000 Nine months after FYE 6/30 (3/31) (a) Audited financial statements of the Agency for the most recent fiscal year, prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles as promulgated to apply to governmental entities from time to time by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board, and as further modified according to applicable State law. If the Agency's audited financial statements are not available by the time the Annual Report is required to be filed pursuant to Section 3(a), the Annual Report shall contain unaudited financial statements in a format similar to the usual format utilized by the Agency, and the audited financial statements shall be filed in the same manner as the Annual Report when they become available. The financial statements of the Agency may be consolidated with those of the County of Contra Costa and its related entities; (b) The following information for the most recently completed fiscal year, in substantially the form set forth in the Official Statement relating to the Bonds: (i) Assessed values of property in each Project Area in substantially the form of Tables 3, 11, 19, 27 and 35 of the Official Statement; (ii) Gross and Net Tax Revenues in each Project Area in substantially the form of Tables 7, 8, 15, 16, 23, 24, 31, 32, 39 and 40 of the Official Statement; (iii) Issuance by the Agency of any Parity Debt with respect to any Project Area (if and to the extent permitted by the Loan Agreements); March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes402 - B-4 - EXHIBIT B: REQUIRED INFORMATION FOR ANNUAL REPORTS OF COUNTY AND AUTHORITY Issue Description Due Date Filing Requirements (iv) Information about each pending and successful appeal of assessed values in each Project Area that exceeds 5% of assessed value in such Project Area; (v) Incremental taxable value, tax levy, current year collections, current collections as a percentage of current year levy collected, total collections and total collections as a percentage of the current year's tax levy in each Project Area in substantially the form of Tables 4, 12, 20, 28 and 36 of the Official Statement; (vi) Amount of all Agency debt outstanding secured by a pledge of the Tax Revenues in each Project Area; (vii) Cumulative amount of Tax Revenues received by the Agency to date in such Project Area (except the Montalvin Manor Project Area); and (vii) Loan payments made pursuant to each Loan Agreement and the debt service coverage ratio for its obligations under each Loan Agreement and all applicable Parity Debt in substantially the form of Tables 6, 11, 16, 21 and 26. (c) A copy of the report provided by the Authority pursuant to Section 5.11(b) of the Indenture for the most recent fiscal year; provided that if no such report is required to be provided pursuant to said Section 5.11(b), the information described in clauses (i) and (ii) of said Section 5.11(b). (d) For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010, information about the final resolution of the North Richmond Escrow Fund and the Bay Point Escrow Fund. Tax Allocation Revenue Bonds (Multiple Project Areas), Series 2003A, $43,345,000, (Multiple Project Areas-Housing Set Aside Revenues), Series 2003B, $2,445,000 Nine months after FYE 6/30 (3/31) (a) Audited financial statements of the Agency for the most recent fiscal year, prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles as promulgated to apply to governmental entities from time to time by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board and as further modified according to applicable State law. If the Agency's audited financial statements are not available by the time the Annual Report is required to be filed pursuant to Section 3(a), the Annual Report shall contain unaudited financial statements in a format similar to the usual format utilized by the Agency, and the audited financial statements shall be filed in the same manner as the Annual Report when they become available. The financial statements of the Agency may be consolidated with those of the County of Contra Costa and its related entities; (b ) The following information for the most recently completed fiscal year, in substantially the form set forth in the Official Statement relating to the Bonds: (i) Assessed values of property in each Project Area in substantially the form of Tables 2, 8, 14, and 20 of the Official Statement; (ii) Tax Revenues in each Project Area in substantially the form of Tables 5,6, 11, 12, 17, 18,23 and 24 of the Official Statement; (iii) Issuance by the Agency of any Parity Debt with respect to any Project Area (if and to the extent permitted by the Loan Agreements); (iv) Information about each pending and successful appeal of assessed values in each Project Area that exceeds 5% of assessed value in such Project Area; (v) Incremental taxable value, tax levy, current year collections, current collections as a percentage of current year levy collected, total collections and total collections as a percentage of the current year's tax levy in each Project Area in substantially the form of Tables 3, 9, 15, and 21 of the Official Statement; (vi) Amount of all Agency debt outstanding secured by a pledge of the Tax Revenues in each Project Area, and cumulative amount of Tax Revenues received by the Agency to date in such Project Area; and (vii) Loan payments made pursuant to each Loan Agreement and the debt service coverage ratio for its obligations under each Loan Agreement and all applicable Parity Debt in substantially the form of Tables 7, 13, 19, and 25. (c) A copy of the report provided by the Authority pursuant to Section 5.11 (b) of the Indentures for the most recent fiscal year; provided that if no March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes403 - B-5 - EXHIBIT B: REQUIRED INFORMATION FOR ANNUAL REPORTS OF COUNTY AND AUTHORITY Issue Description Due Date Filing Requirements such report is required to be provided pursuant to said Section 5.11(b), the information described in clauses (i) and (ii) of said Section 5.ll(b). (d) For as long as the 1995 North Richmond Loan is outstanding, a copy of reports required by Section 7.13 of the North Richmond First Supplemental Loan Agreement (as defined in the Official Statement). (e) For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005, information about the final resolution of the Pleasant Hill BART Escrow Fund. Tax Allocation Revenue Bonds (Pleasant Hill BART, North Richmond, Bay Point, Oakley and Rodeo Redevelopment Project Areas), Series 1999, $44,615,000 Nine months after FYE 6/30 (3/31) (a) Audited financial statements of the Agency for the most recent fiscal year, prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles as promulgated to apply to governmental entities from time to time by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board, and as further modified according to applicable State law. If the Agency's audited financial statements are not available by the time the Annual Report is required to be filed pursuant to Section 3(a), the Annual Report shall contain unaudited financial statements in a format similar to the usual format utilized by the Agency, and the audited financial statements shall be filed in the same manner as the Annual Report when they become available. The financial statements of the Agency may be consolidated with those of the County of Contra Costa and its related entities; (b) The following information for the most recently completed fiscal year, in substantially the form set forth in the Official Statement relating to the Bonds: (i) Assessed values of property in each Project Area in substantially the form of Tables 3, 8, 13, 18 and 23 of the Official Statement; (ii) Tax Revenues in each Project Area in substantially the form of Tables 5, 10, 15, 20 and 25 of the Official Statement; (iii) Issuance by the Agency of any Parity Debt with respect to any Project Area (if and to the extent permitted by the Loan Agreements); (iv) Information about each pending and successful appeal of assessed values in each Project Area that exceeds 5% of assessed value in such Project Area; (v) Incremental taxable value, tax levy, current year collections, current collections as a percentage of current year levy collected, total collections and total collections as a percentage of the current year's tax levy in each Project Area in substantially the form of Tables 2, 7, 12, 17 and 22 of the Official Statement; (vi) Amount of all Agency debt outstanding secured by a pledge of the Tax Revenues in each Project Area, and cumulative amount of Tax Revenues received by the Agency to date in such Project Area; and (vii) Loan payments made pursuant to each Loan Agreement and the debt service coverage ratio for its obligations under each Loan Agreement and all applicable Parity Debt in substantially the form of Tables 6, 11, 16, 21 and 26. (c) A copy of the report provided by the Authority pursuant to Section 5.11 (b) of the Indenture for the most recent fiscal year; provided that if no such report is required to be provided pursuant to said Section 5.ll(b), the information described in clauses (i) and (ii) of said Section 5.11(b). (d) For as long as the 1995 North Richmond Loan is outstanding, a copy of the reports required by Section 7.13 of the North Richmond First Supplemental Loan Agreement (as defined in the Official Statement). (e) For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003, information about the final resolution of the Pleasant Hill BART Escrow Fund. Special Assessment Districts: 2013 Special Tax Refunding Bonds, $5,605,000 Nine months (a) The audited financial statements of the County for the prior fiscal year prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in effect from time to time by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board to apply to governmental entities. If the audited financial statements are March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes404 - B-6 - EXHIBIT B: REQUIRED INFORMATION FOR ANNUAL REPORTS OF COUNTY AND AUTHORITY Issue Description Due Date Filing Requirements after FYE 6/30 (3/31) not available by the time the Annual Disclosure Report is required to be filed pursuant to Section 3(a), the Annual Disclosure Report shall contain unaudited financial statements in a format similar to the financial statements contained in the Official Statement, and the audited financial statements shall be filed in the same manner as the Annual Disclosure Report when they become available. (b) The following information with respect to the 2013 Bonds and the District: 1. The principal amount of the 2013 Bonds outstanding. 2. The balances of all funds and accounts established by the Fiscal Agent Agreement as of the end of the next preceding fiscal year. 3. Total assessed value of all parcels subject to the Special Tax. 4. Actual Special Tax levy for the most recent fiscal year, Special Tax and property tax delinquency rate for parcels in the District for the most recent year. 5. Concerning delinquent parcels: (i) number of parcels delinquent in payment of Special Tax, (ii) amount of total delinquency and as a percentage of total Special Tax levy, and (iii) status of the County’s foreclosure proceedings upon delinquent properties. 6. Identity of any delinquent tax payer obligated for more than 10% of the annual Special Tax levy and: (i) assessed value of applicable properties, and (ii) summary of results of foreclosure sales, if available. 7. Significant amendments to land use entitlements for property in the District known to the Director of the Department of Conservation and Development. 8. Status of any significant legislative, administrative, and judicial challenges to the construction of the development in the District known to the Director of the Department of Conservation and Development, without independent inquiry, for any year in which construction activity has occurred in the District. 2001 Revenue Bonds (Reassessment District of 2001), $6,575,000 Nine months after FYE 6/30 (3/31) (a) Items relating to the Authority. (i) Outstanding principal amount of the Bonds as of the end of the most recent fiscal year; and (ii) Balance of the Reserve Fund as of the end of the most recent fiscal year. (b) Items relating to the Reassessment District. Unless otherwise provided in the audited financial statements filed on or prior to the annual filing deadline for the Annual Reports provided for in Section 3 above, financial information and operating data with respect to the Reassessment District for the preceding fiscal year, substantially similar to that provided in the corresponding tables and charts in the Official Statement for the Bonds, as follows: March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes405 - B-7 - EXHIBIT B: REQUIRED INFORMATION FOR ANNUAL REPORTS OF COUNTY AND AUTHORITY Issue Description Due Date Filing Requirements (i) Principal amount outstanding of the Reassessment Bonds. (ii) Balance in the Redemption Funds created pursuant to the Paying Agent Agreement relating to the Reassessment Bonds. (iii) Total aggregate assessed value (per the County records) of all parcels currently subject to the Reassessments within the Reassessment District showing the total aggregate assessed valuation for all improvements within the Reassessment District. (iv) With respect to the Reassessment District, but only in the event the sum of uncured Reassessment delinquencies for such Reassessment District for the preceding Fiscal Year exceeds 5 percent of the Reassessment installments posted to the tax roll for such Fiscal Year (3% if any portion of the Reassessment District does not participate in the County's Teeter Plan), delinquency information for each parcel then delinquent in the payment of Reassessments, including the amount of such delinquency, length of delinquency and status of any foreclosure (including results of foreclosure sales). (v) A land ownership summary listing property owners (and the assessed values of their property) responsible for more than five percent (5%) of the annual Reassessments within the Reassessment District, as shown on the Contra Costa County Assessor's last equalized tax roll prior to the September next preceding the Annual Report Date. (vi) A copy of any information given by the Authority to the California Debt and Investment Advisory Commission pursuant to Government Code Section 6599.1. 1998 Special Tax Refunding Bonds (Pleasant Hill BART Station Area), $4,785,000 Nine months after FYE 6/30 (3/31) 1. Principal amount of Bonds outstanding. 2. Balance in the Reserve Fund. 3. Balance in other funds and accounts held by County or Fiscal Agent and related to the Bonds. 4. Additional debt authorized but not issued by the County and payable from or secured by special taxes or assessments with respect to property within the District. 5. Special tax delinquency rate, total amount of delinquencies, number of parcels delinquent in payment. 6. Identity of each delinquent taxpayer responsible for 5 percent or more of the total special taxes levied, and the following information: assessor parcel number, assessed value of applicable properties, amount levied, amount delinquent by parcel number and status of foreclosure proceedings. If any foreclosure has been completed, summary of results of foreclosure sales or transfers. 7. Most recently available total assessed value of parcels subject to the special taxes. 8. Total number of units occupied as of the immediately preceding June 30th, as reported by the County in the Yearly Housing Bond Issuance Report submitted by the County to the California Debt and Investment Advisory Commission. March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes406 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 407 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 408 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 409 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 410 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 411 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 412 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 413 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 414 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 415 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 416 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 417 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 418 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 419 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 420 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 421 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 422 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 423 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 424 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 425 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 426 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 427 1 G:\CDBG-REDEV\MF MRB\MF MRB Policies\MFMRB Policy.2011.doc APPENDIX 5 County of Contra Costa Multifamily Mortgage Revenue Bond Program Policy March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 428 2 G:\CDBG-REDEV\MF MRB\MF MRB Policies\MFMRB Policy.2011.doc Summary Federal, state and local legislation authorize issuance of mortgage revenue bonds by local governments to finance the development, acquisition and rehabilitation of multifamily rental housing projects pursuant to Section 52075 of the California Health and Safety Code, and applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. The allocation of private activity bond authority is secured through the California Debt Limit Allocation Committee (CDLAC). The interest on the bonds can be exempt from federal and state taxation. As a result, bonds provide below market financing for qualified rental projects located within Contra Costa County (the “County”)*. In additional the bonds issued under the program can qualify projects for allocations of federal low-income housing tax credits, which can provide a significant portion of the funding necessary to develop affordable housing. The program is administered by the County’s Department of Conservation and Development (DCD). There is no direct legal liability to the County in connection with the repayment of bonds; there is no pledge of the County’s faith, credit or taxing power and the bonds do not constitute general obligations of the issuer because the security for repayment of bonds is limited to project revenue and other sources specified under each financing. Project loans are, in most cases, secured by a first deed of trust on the bond-financed property. The program is completely self-supporting; developers must secure funding to pay for costs of issuance of the bonds and all other costs under each financing. The bonds may be used for construction, rehabilitation and permanent financing. The effective mortgage rate is the aggregate of the applicable bond rate and the add-on fees charged under the program such as lender, trustee, issuer’s fee, etc. The bond rate, for fixed rate bonds, is determined at the time of a bond sale, and the resulting mortgage rate is approximately 1.5-2% below conventional mortgage rates. The project loans generally have a 30-year amortization schedule. The goals of the program include: • Increase and preserve the supply of affordable rental housing; • Encourage economic diversity within residential communities; • Maintain a quality living environment for residents of assisted projects and surrounding properties; and • In the event of provision of public funds towards the project, optimize the effectiveness of those funds by maximizing the leveraging of private sector funds. Eligibility The project must be located within Contra Costa County and consist of complete rental units, including full kitchens and bathrooms, and cannot be used for transient or student housing. * The County has authority to issue on behalf of Cities within the County pursuant to Contra Costa County 1982 Home Mortgage Revenue Bonds Cooperation Agreements. The County works closely with local communities to meet their housing objectives. There is no limit on the maximum or minimum project size or number of units. However, smaller size projects (fewer than 40 units or less than $2 million loan) may not find tax exempt financing economically efficient due to the costs of issuance, services of the March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 429 3 G:\CDBG-REDEV\MF MRB\MF MRB Policies\MFMRB Policy.2011.doc financial team, rating fees, etc. Proposed combined or pooled projects will be considered on a case by case basis. For projects requiring bond financing greater than $35 million, it will be necessary to obtain a waiver from the CDLAC in order to receive an allocation. Loan funds may be used for costs of property acquisition (no more than 25% of bond proceeds can be used for the acquisition of land), construction, rehabilitation, improvements, architectural and engineering services, construction interest, loan fees and other capital costs of the project incurred after the Bond Inducement date (specified in Financing Process section). Pursuant to federal requirements, if bonds are used for acquisition and rehabilitation, at least 15% of the portion of the acquisition cost of the building and related equipment financed with the proceeds of the bonds must be used for rehabilitation of the project. No more than 2% of any tax-exempt bond loan can be used to finance costs of issuance, such as the services of the financing team members, rating and printing of bonds, bond allocation, etc. County Compensation The County’s fees are comprised of (1) a non-refundable application fee due prior to drafting a Reimbursement Inducement Resolution, (2) an issuance fee due upon bond closing, and (3) an annual fee due in advance to cover costs of monitoring compliance with State and federal law requirements as contained in a Regulatory Agreement. The annual fees may be negotiated, however the standard fee is 1/8 of 1% (or .125%) of the principal amount of bonds outstanding. Annual fees are charged for the full term of the Regulatory Agreement, generally 55 years. At the County’s discretion, annual fees above a $5,000 minimum may be subordinated to payment of debt service. The County fees are summarized in the table below: Issuer Fee Schedule Application (1) Issuance Fee Annual Fee (2) Rate (3) .125% Rate (3) .125% $2,500 Minimum $5,000 Minimum $5,000 Maximum $75,000 Maximum $25,000 (1) Payable upon request of Reimbursement Inducement Resolution. Amount applied to Issuance Fee at closing. DCD may waive this requirement in its sole discretion. (2) Amounts above the minimum may be subordinated to bond debt service, at the County’s option. (3) Percentage applied to the initial bond issuance amount. Types of Bonds March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 430 4 G:\CDBG-REDEV\MF MRB\MF MRB Policies\MFMRB Policy.2011.doc The County may issue either tax-exempt or taxable bonds. Taxable bonds would generally be issued in combination with tax-exempt bonds. Tax-Exempt Private Activity Bonds (non- refunding) require an allocation of bond authority from CDLAC. To obtain the allocation the County must submit an application to CDLAC on behalf of the developer. Submittal of the application is at the discretion of the County, not the developer. The developer must pay all required CDLAC fees when due. The interest on taxable bonds is not exempt from federal taxation. These bonds are not subject to federal volume “cap” limitations and therefore do not require allocation authority from CDLAC. Taxable bonds can be used in combination with low-income housing tax credits awarded by the Tax Credit Allocation Committee. Taxable bond issues must meet all applicable requirements of this Policy (including rating requirements) and any additional regulations that may be promulgated, from time to time, by the County The County may issue 501(c)(3) bonds on behalf of qualified nonprofit organizations. 501 (c)(3) bonds are tax-exempt and do not require an allocation from CDLAC, but cannot be used with the Low Income Housing Tax Credit Program. Refunding Bonds will be allowed if the issuance meets the following conditions: 1. The Project Sponsor agrees to cover all costs of the issuer. 2. Projects originally financed by tax-exempt bonds prior to the 1986 Tax Act will have to make a minimum 10% of the units affordable to persons earning 50% of the median area income with the rents affordable at the same level. 3. The affordability restrictions of the existing bond regulatory agreement are subject to extension and/or additional restrictions. All specifics of refunding proposals must be approved by the County. 4. Default refunding applications require a default refunding analysis (to determine the eligibility for a default refunding). The County shall choose the firm to conduct the analysis. The project applicant will deposit the cost for the study with the County before the study begins. Affordability Requirements Term The project must remain as rental housing and continuously meet the affordability requirements for at least 55 years from the date of 50% occupancy of the project. At the conclusion of the Regulatory period, rent of “in-place” tenants will continue to be governed by the applicable affordability restriction, so long as those tenants continue to live in the development. Income Restrictions To be eligible for tax-exempt bond financing, federal and State law require that the project meet one of the following conditions: (a) A minimum of 20% of the units in the project must be set aside for occupancy by households whose income does not exceed 50% of area median income, as adjusted for family size; or (b) A minimum of 10% of the units in the project must be set aside for occupancy by households whose incomes do not exceed 50% of area median income, as adjusted for family size AND an additional 40% of the units in the project must March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 431 5 G:\CDBG-REDEV\MF MRB\MF MRB Policies\MFMRB Policy.2011.doc be set aside for occupancy by households whose incomes do not exceed 60% of area median income, as adjusted for family size. Project owners must certify their tenant’s eligibility annually. If at the annual certification it is found that a tenant’s income exceeds 140% of the current income limit, the owner must rent the next available unit of comparable size to a new income eligible tenant. The owner may raise the current tenant’s rent to market rent only upon renting the next available unit to a new low-income or very low-income household, as applicable. A unit occupied only by full time students does not count towards the set-aside requirement. Rent Restrictions The maximum rents for all the affordable units are equal to 30% of the applicable monthly maximum income level, assuming one person in a studio, two persons in a one-bedroom, three persons in a two-bedroom and four persons in a three-bedroom unit. These assumptions differ for projects using Low Income Housing Tax Credits. In the event that both are used, the more restrictive rents apply. The maximum rents are further reduced by the amount of the utility allowance applicable to those units, based on unit size. Utility allowances are set by the Housing Authority of the County of Contra Costa and are based solely upon the utilities paid by the tenant. The set-aside units must proportionately reflect the mix of all units in the project, be distributed throughout the project, and have the same floor area, amenities, and access to project facilities as market-rate units. Regulatory Agreement The rental and affordability unit requirements will be contained in a Regulatory Agreement that is recorded with the property and must be complied with by subsequent buyers for the minimum rental period. The requirements are terminated at the later of the end of the minimum rental period and repayment in full of the bonds or in the event of total casualty loss or foreclosure. Financing Team Bond Counsel and Financial Advisor, if applicable, specifically represent the interests and concerns of the County in ensuring the integrity of the bond transaction. The project sponsor may, at its own expense, add additional members to the finance team to represent its interests. Financial Advisor If deemed necessary, the Financial Advisor will be designated by DCD. They will prepare a feasibility study of whether it is economically advisable to proceed with the financing, including: evaluations of the financial strength of the project; assumptions regarding income and expenses; sources of security for bonds in addition to the project; developers financial situation and experience in operating and managing rental projects; marketability of the bonds; rights and resources of parties to the transaction in the event of default; and provide financial advise on all relevant issues to best protect the interests of the County. The compensation for financial advisory services to determine whether it is advisable to proceed with a financing will not be contingent on the sale of the bonds. Bond Counsel March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 432 6 G:\CDBG-REDEV\MF MRB\MF MRB Policies\MFMRB Policy.2011.doc Bond Counsel will be designated for each financing by the County Board of Supervisors. Bond counsel will prepare the necessary legal documentation, including provisions regarding compliance with any applicable continuing disclosure requirements, provide an opinion regarding the validity of the bonds and their tax exemption, and provide legal advice on all relevant issues to best protect the interests of the County. Additional Parties The Bond Underwriter, Remarketing Agent, Private Placement Purchaser, and Bond Trustee, if required, will be selected by the County in consultation with the project sponsor. The fees for such services will be paid solely out of bond proceeds or otherwise by the project sponsor. The Financing Process 1. Request for Financing (New or Refunding) – A letter of request must be sent to the DCD stating the desire to use the County’s Multifamily Mortgage Revenue Bond Program. The letter should include: a. Name of Development Project; b. Location by street address and assessor’s parcel number (if known); c. Estimated number units; d. Estimated development costs including land (bonds to be issued cannot exceed this amount); e. Exact legal name of the ownership entity at the time of bond closing (e.g. name of individual, partnership, corporation, etc. and f. If different, name of the operating entity at the time of bond closing. g. Non-refundable application fee of $2,500 to cover the administrative costs of reviewing the project feasibility, Inducement and TEFRA Hearing processes. 2. Board of Supervisor Approval of Reimbursement [Inducement] Resolution – The Reimbursement Resolution is a conditional statement of intent on the part of the County to provide tax-exempt financing for the project. The Resolution is non- binding, however it authorizes the submittal of the application to CDLAC by the County and it sets the date (which is 60-days earlier than the Inducement Date) from which costs related to the project are eligible for financing. 3. Public Hearing/Section 147(f) Resolution – Tax law requires that a public hearing be held to take comment on the nature of and location of the facility proposed to be financed with private activity bonds (Multifamily Mortgage Revenue Bonds included). The hearing must be noticed in a local newspaper of general circulation at least 14 days prior to the hearing. The legislative body then adopts a resolution approving the issuance of bonds pursuant to Section 147(f) of the Tax Code after the hearing is held. This is not the final approval of the bond issuance. The DCD holds the hearing administratively and the Board of Supervisors approves the Section 147(f) Resolution at a subsequent Board meeting. DCD may opt to schedule the required public hearing with the Board of Supervisors. 4. Securement of CDLAC Allocation – The CDLAC allocation of private activity bond authority is subject to an application process. The application must be submitted to the County for review and comment at least 10 days prior to the CDLAC deadline. The final application must include the current application fee for CDLAC and a March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 433 7 G:\CDBG-REDEV\MF MRB\MF MRB Policies\MFMRB Policy.2011.doc performance deposit in the amount of .5% of the requested allocation amount to be held by the County. The deposit is returned according to CDLAC procedures, but is subject to reversion to CDLAC if the financing does not close according to their procedures. The CDLAC process includes approximately 60 days for review of applications prior to allocation. 5. Bond Sale Resolution – When an allocation is received the County and financing parties have 90 days in which to complete the financing and sell and close on the issuance of the bonds. All real estate, lender and bond documents are completed. The Board of Supervisors must approve a Bond Sale Resolution, typically 30 days in advance of the proposed bond closing. Bond Sale Modes/Issuing Criteria Under its tax exempt financing program the County provides loans secured by a first deed of trust. A fundamental requirement for financings is that the project have loan underwriting and credit enhancement from a third party institution that bears the ultimate risk and responsibility of the loan. The County may consider unrated bonds on a case by case basis. Subordinate financing from other federal, state, or local agencies may be integrated into a plan of finance for the project. Early consultation with County staff is encouraged. Any bonds issued under the program that are sold to the public should generally be rated “A”, or its equivalent, or better from a nationally recognized rating agency. The same rating requirement applies in the case of a substitution of existing credit facility for bonds that are outstanding. A preferred way of obtaining the required rating on the bonds is through the provision of additional, outside credit support for the bond issue provided by rated, financially strong private institutions, such as bond insurance companies; domestic and foreign banks and insurance companies; FHA mortgage insurance or co-insurance, etc. The rating on the bonds is based on the credit worthiness of the participating credit enhancement provider. The applicant is required to identify and obtain credit enhancement for each bond issuance. As the primary source of security for the repayment of bonds, the credit enhancement provider reviews and approves the borrower and the project and its feasibility, including the size of the loan and the terms of repayment using their own underwriting criteria. Fixed rate bonds, or their portion, can be issued without credit enhancement if the proposed financing structure results in the required minimum rating on the bonds by a nationally recognized rating agency. Bonds issued without credit enhancement will be sold to institutional investors in minimum $100,000 denominations. Private Placement Bonds Private Placement Bonds are allowed under the following conditions: 1. The bonds are privately placed with “qualified institutional buyers” under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933, or “accredited investors,” as generally defined under Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933. 2. The bonds must be sold in minimum $100,000 denominations. 3. All initial and subsequent purchasers must be willing to sign a sophisticated investor letter in a form approved by the County. While the bonds remain unrated, their March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 434 8 G:\CDBG-REDEV\MF MRB\MF MRB Policies\MFMRB Policy.2011.doc transferability will be restricted to qualified institutional buyers or accredited invested who sign an Investor Letter. 4. The County may limit the number of investors. 5. The owner must indemnify the County against any costs incurred by the County, including any lawsuit initiated by the bondholder or any other party, regardless of whether the developer is negligent, and if requested by the County, post a surety bond guaranteeing the same. Change of Ownership The County reserves the right to approve any voluntary change in ownership (i) that results in a transfer of 50% or more of the total equity interests in a developer or (ii) that results in a transfer of any general partner or managing member interest in the developer. Such approval to transfer ownership shall be at the discretion of the County. Transfers made by a limited partner tax credit investor to its affiliates may, at the County’s discretion, be exempted from this requirement. The County shall review proposed owner management practices on current and previously owned properties, inspections, financial statements and credit histories. Other Issuers Projects financed with subordinate financing from the County (CDBG, HOME, etc.) will be financed by bonds issued by the County. The County may consent to the use of statewide issuers for private activity bonds (including 501c3 bonds) to finance projects located within the unincorporated County when such projects are part of a common plan of finance with one or more projects located within the County. DCD may waive the limitations on the use of statewide issuers. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 435 APPENDIX 6 Contra Costa County Debt Management Policies For Successor Agency to the former Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 436 I. Purpose The purpose of this Successor Agency (“Agency”) Debt Management Policy is to organize and formalize the Agency’s debt-related policies and practices and establish a framework for administering and potentially refinancing the Agency's debt. The primary objectives of the policy are to: • Promote sound financial management • Assist the Agency in evaluating debt refinancing options • Ensure full and timely repayment of debt • Maintain full and complete financial disclosure and good investor relations • Ensure compliance with applicable state and federal laws II. Responsibility/Approval Process The Director of the Department of Conservation and Development, Deputy Director-Redevelopment, or designee shall be responsible for managing and coordinating all activities related to the administration and potential refinancing of the Agency’s debt, including investment of bond proceeds, compliance with bond covenants, continuing disclosure, and arbitrage compliance. III. Debt Issuance Refinancing The Agency may refinance all or a portion of an outstanding debt issue when such refinancing enables the Agency to realize significant debt service savings or other policy goals. In general, refinancing that produces a net present value savings of at least three percent (3%) of the refinanced debt, without extending the term of the refinanced debt, will be considered economically viable. Refinancing that produce a net present value savings of less than three percent (3%) will be considered on a case-by-case basis if there is a compelling public policy objective that is accomplished by retiring the debt. For example, the Agency may pursue a non-economic refinancing to eliminate undesirable legal covenants in outstanding bond documents, to restructure the debt service profile, or to change the tax status of the debt. IV. Debt Structure Project Area Debt The Agency may refinance debt for a single project area or may combine financings for multiple project areas to achieve economies of scale or credit benefits. Each project area debt component must conform to the requirements and limitations of its respective project area redevelopment plan. Debt Service Reserve Fund The Agency may finance a debt service reserve fund from bond proceeds or other funds, consistent with federal tax law, to March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 437 enhance the marketability of the bonds and/or to satisfy requirements of outstanding debt covenants. The Agency may purchase a reserve fund equivalent (such as a reserve fund surety) when such purchase is considered to be advantageous to the economics of the debt issuance. Bond Insurance The Agency may purchase bond insurance (or secure a letter of credit) for any proposed financing if the economic benefit of the insurance realized through lower interest costs exceeds the cost of the insurance. The Director of the Department of Conservation and Development, Deputy Director – Redevelopment or designee will soli cit quotes from providers, and shall have the authority to select a provider whose bid is most cost effective, and whose terms and conditions are satisfactory to the County. Call Provisions In general the bonds will include a call feature that is no longer than 10 years from the date of delivery of the bonds. The Agency will seek to avoid the sale of non-callable bonds absent careful evaluation by the Agency of the value of the call option. Original Issue Discount An original issue discount will be permitted only if the Agency determines that such discount results in a lower true interest cost on the bonds and that the use will not adversely affect the projects to be financed. Interest Rate Mode The Agency shall use only fixed-rate debt to refinance its bonds. VI. Financing Team The Agency employs outside financial specialists to assist in developing a debt strategy, preparing bond documents, marketing bonds to investors and generally implementing its financing plan. The Director of the Department of Conservation and Development, Deputy Director – Redevelopment, or designee shall have the authority to periodically select service providers as necessary to meet legal requirements and minimize net Agency debt costs. Such services, depending on the type of financing, may include bond counsel, disclosure counsel, financial advisory, underwriting, trustee, verification agent, escrow agent, arbitrage consulting, and fiscal consulting. The goal in selecting service providers is to achieve an appropriate balance between service and cost. VII. Method of Sale The Agency may select a method of sale that is most appropriate for a particular financing or debt program in light of the financial, market, transaction-specific, and Agency-related conditions. The Director of the Department of Conservation and Development, Deputy Director – Redevelopment and/or Community Development Bond Program Manager shall be responsible for determining the appropriate March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 438 manner in which to offer any securities to investors, and may consider negotiated sale, competitive bid or private placement, as appropriate. The Agency’s bonds have traditionally been sold via negotiated sale. This has been reflective of a complex structure which has required significant up-front work by the bond underwriter, and a strong pre-marketing effort at sale. The Agency may elect to privately place its debt if it is demonstrated to result in a cost savings to the Agency relative to other methods of debt issuance. VIII. Debt Administration Investment of bond proceeds Investments of bond proceeds shall be consistent with federal tax requirements, the County’s adopted Investment Policy as modified from time to time, and with requirements contained in the governing bond documents. Continuing Disclosure The Agency is committed to full and complete primary and secondary market financial disclosure in accordance with disclosure requirements established by the Securities and Exchange Commission and Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board, as may be amended from time to time. The Agency is also committed to cooperating fully with rating agencies, institutional and individual investors, other levels of government, and the general public to share clear, timely, and accurate financial information. Arbitrage Compliance The Agency shall maintain a system of record keeping and reporting to meet the arbitrage compliance requirements of federal tax law or procure an outside contractor for such service. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 439 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE revised Bylaws of the Advisory Council on Aging as recommended by the Employment and Human Services Department Director. FISCAL IMPACT: Not applicable. BACKGROUND: The Advisory Council on Aging (ACOA) is an advisory body to the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors. In review of the ACOA Bylaws, revisions were made to provide greater overall clarity. No substantive changes have been made to the Bylaws. ACOA Bylaws revisions are minor changes and reflect technical clean-up. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If not approved, the Advisory Council on Aging Bylaws will contain minor inconsistencies. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: Not applicable. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 03/08/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Elaine Burres, 313-1717 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: March 8, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stephanie Mello, Deputy cc: C. 42 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director Date:March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Advisory Council on Aging Bylaws Revision(s) March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 440 ATTACHMENTS ACOA Revised Bylaws March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 441 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY AADDVVIISSOORRYY CCOOUUNNCCIILL OONN AAGGIINNGG March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 442 ADVISORY COUNCIL ON AGING BYLAWS INDEX PREAMBLE ARTICLE I NAME Page 1.1 Name 1 ARTICLE II PURPOSE 2.1 Planning for Older Residents 1 2.2 Leadership and Advocacy 1 2.3 Advise on Area Plan 1-2 ARTICLE III MEMBERSHIP 3.1 Composition of Council 2 3.2 Membership Status 2 3.3 Members’ Terms of Office 2 3.4 Residency and Age Requirement 2 3.5 Ex-Officio Members 2-3 3.6 Past Council Presidents 3 3.7 Emeritus Members 3 3.8 Members 3 3.9 Attendance 3 3.10 Leaves of Absence 3-4 3.11 Resignation 4 3.12 Removal of Members 4 ARTICLE IV MEMBERSHIP MANDATES 4.1 Commitment 4 4.2 Ethics Training 4 4.3 Disclosure of Financial Interests 4 4.4 Perception of Conflict 5 ARTICLE V OFFICERS 5.1 Council Officers 5 5.2 Officers’ Terms of Office 5 5.3 Officers’ Duties 5 5.4 Representation on TACC 5 5.5 Succession Protocol - President 5 5.6 Succession Protocol – All Other Officers 5-6 5.7 Termination of Officers 6 5.8 Director of Aging and Adult Services 6 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 443 ARTICLE VI MEETINGS, COMMITTEES, WORK GROUPS 6.1 Regular Meetings 6 6.2 Special Meetings 6 6.3 Executive Committee 6 6.4 Annual Meeting 6-7 6.5 Committee and Work Group Structure 7 6.6 Committee Quorums 7 6.7 Committees and Work Groups 7 6.8 Task Force and Ad Hoc Committees 7-8 6.9 Standing Committees and Work Groups 8 ARTICLE VII CONDUCT OF MEETINGS 7.1 Order of Business 8 7.2 Council Quorum 8 7.3 Quorum Declaration 8 7.4 Meetings in Absence of a Quorum 8 ARTICLE VIII NOMINATING COMMITTEE 8.1 Annual formation of Committee 8-9 8.2 Purpose of Nominating Committee 9 8.3 Structure of Committee 9 8.4 Presentation of Slate of Officers 9 8.5 Nominating Committee Terms of Office 9 ARTICLE IX AMENDMENTS 9.1 Amendments to Bylaws 9 9.2 No conflict with Board of Supervisors 9 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 444 @bcl@14038681.doc 1 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ADVISORY COUNCIL ON AGING BYLAWS As of December 1, 2015 PREAMBLE In recognition of the problems of the older people of Contra Costa County and the need for concerted community action to help resolve these problems, this non-sectarian, non-partisan organization was formed in 1962. ARTICLE I – NAME 1.1 The name of this organization shall be “CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ADVISORY COUNCIL ON AGING”, which shall hereinafter be re- ferred to as "The Council". * *The Board of Supervisors sanctioned the Council as the County-wide Coordinating Committee in 1969. Under the Older Americans Act (Title III of the Older Americans Comprehensive Services Amendment of 1973), the Contra Costa Area Agency on Aging was established October 1, 1975, with the Advisory Council on Aging as the representative group which advises the Board of Supervisors on the Contra Cos- ta Area Plan and its implementation. ARTICLE II – PURPOSE 2.1 Planning for Older Residents The Council shall provide a means for county-wide planning, coopera- tion and coordination for individuals and groups interested in improv- ing and developing services and opportunities for the older residents of this County. 2.2 Leadership and Advocacy The Council shall provide leadership and advocacy on behalf of older persons and serve as a channel of communication and information on aging. 2.3 Advise on Area Plan The Council shall advise the Area Agency on Aging, the Aging and Adult Services Bureau of the Contra Costa County Employment and Human Services Department (hereinafter referred to as "Aging and Adult Services") and the Board of Supervisors on an Area Plan based on the unmet needs and priorities of older persons as determined by March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 445 @bcl@14038681.doc 2 surveys of local committees (commissions) and coalitions on aging, and results of public hearings held in conjunction with Aging and Adult Services. ARTICLE III - MEMBERSHIP 3.1 Composition of Council Including the officers, the Council shall have not more than 40 mem- bers. These members shall consist of the designated representatives of the local municipalities [nineteen (19)], and one (1) Senior Nutrition Program Council representative. The remainder will be Members-at- Large (20.) The Council will strive to achieve membership that reflects the ethnic, economic and geographic balance of the senior population of the County. The Council will make every effort to achieve a me m- bership where one-fourth of the Council is made up of actual consu m- ers of services under the Area Plan, and at least one member will represent the interests of people with disabilities. 3.2 Membership Status Members-at-large are appointed by the County Board of Supervisors, following their standard policies and procedures for such appoint- ments. Local municipalities and the Senior Nutrition Program Council select a representative as their designated liaison to the Council. 3.3 Members’ Terms of Office The County Board of Supervisors shall approve members for an ap- proximate two (2) year term. All terms expire on September 30th. Ac- cordingly, an appointment made on a date other than October 1 will have a term adjusted to expire on the September 30 prior to the two- year anniversary date. When applicable, any vacant seat shall be filled for the unexpired term remaining for that seat. 3.4 Residency and Age Requirement All members shall reside in Contra Costa County. Change of residence to outside of Contra Costa County will automatically terminate mem- bership on the Council. All members shall be at least eighteen (18) years of age. 3.5 Ex-Officio Members Contra Costa County members of the California Commission on A g- ing, the California Senior Legislature and representatives of other groups from Contra Costa County concerned with aging may be in- vited by the Council to join it as ex-officio, non-voting members. Such March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 446 @bcl@14038681.doc 3 ex-officio memberships shall be outside of, and in addition to the num- ber of regular memberships established by Section 3.1 of these bylaws. 3.6 Past Council Presidents All past presidents who are no longer members of the Advisory Coun- cil on Aging shall be considered members ex-officio after their terms of office have been completed. Such memberships shall be non-voting. 3.7 Emeritus Members To honor past exemplary service to the Council, any member of the Council may nominate and a majority of the members may vote to ap- point an Emeritus Member. Such appointment is an honorary lifetime title. Emeritus members may not vote, nor does their membership fac- tor into the quorum determination. 3.8 Appointments of Members When a vacancy occurs, the Membership Committee shall recommend a replacement for approval by the Council and possible appointment by the Board of Supervisors 3.9 Attendance For the purposes of attendance, a membership year is January through December. Due to the inability of the Council to carry out its business when a quorum is not met, attendance at all required meetings is of the utmost importance. All members are required to attend meetings on a regular basis. A member who is absent from four (4) regularly scheduled meetings in a membership year shall be deemed to have voluntarily resigned from the Council. If that occurs, the former Council member’s status will be noted at the next scheduled Council meeting and shall be recorded in the Council’s minutes. The President shall, without further direction from the Commission, inform the Board of Supervisors of the mem- ber’s resignation and request the appointment of a replacement. 3.10 Leaves of Absence A member may request a Leave of Absence. Requests for a Leave of Absence must be in writing and: (1) include the beginning date; (2) the anticipated ending date; and (3) the reason for the leave request. Ex- amples of acceptable reasons for leaves include: bereavement, family and medical leaves, jury and witness duty, or a personal leave for ano- March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 447 @bcl@14038681.doc 4 ther reason. The Executive Committee will determine if the leave is granted or denied and the President will notify the member. If a p- proved, the member’s attendance will not be tallied during the leave period and their seat will not be declared vacant. 3.11 Resignation All members must submit a written resignation when vacating mem- bership. The President shall then submit the resignation to the B oard of Supervisors. 3.12 Removal of Members After three meetings following appointment to the Council, each mem- ber shall be subject to removal for cause by motion of any member and passing vote by a majority of the Council. In the case of municipal a p- pointments, a recommended removal may also occur at any time the municipality withdraws their approval or sponsorship. As the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors is the appointing authority for the Advisory Council on Aging, recommended removals are subject to the ratification of the Board of Supervisors. ARTICLE IV – MEMBERSHIP MANDATES 4.1 Commitment Incoming members are to be active, contributing members as evi- denced by, but not limited to, attendance at the regular monthly Coun- cil meetings and each member is required to participate in the activities of at least one of the Council’s committees or designated work groups. A member must satisfy the attendance requirements of any organiza- tion which they have been assigned to represent the Council. 4.2 Ethics Training All members of the Advisory Council on Aging are required to take formal ethics training (AB1234) every two (2) years. New members have up to one (1) year to fulfill their obligation for the first training. 4.3 Disclosure of Financial Interests All Advisory Council members must annually complete and file Cali- fornia Form 700 – Statement of Economic Interests. The members are only required to disclose those financial interests that are set forth in the Employment and Human Services Department Conflict of Interest Code. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 448 @bcl@14038681.doc 5 4.4 Perception of Conflict The Advisory Council has developed its own document addressing the perception of conflict. Its purpose is to strongly encourage all members to recuse themselves from any discussion or vote which could be inte r- preted as constituting a conflict of interest, be construed as a clash of loyalties or be perceived as self-serving in any way. ARTICLE V – OFFICERS 5.1 Council Officers Officers of the Advisory Council on Aging shall be as follows: Presi- dent, First Vice-President, Second Vice-President, Secretary and Trea- surer. 5.2 Officers’ Terms of Office The above-named officers shall hold office for one (1) year or until their successors are elected or appointed. The aforementioned officers (5.1) may serve no more than two (2) consecutive terms of one year each in the same position. 5.3 Officers’ Duties The duties of the respective officers shall be those regularly associated with such titles except that the President may assign special duties to a specific officer at any time. 5.4 Representation on TACC The President of the Contra Costa County Advisory Council on Aging, as chair of the Advisory Council, shall be the Council’s representative to the Triple A Council of California (TACC.) The 1st Vice President serves as a TACC alternate director (member.) 5.5 Succession Protocol - President In the event that the President does not complete his/her term, the first Vice-President shall move into the presidency and serve out the unex- pired term. The second Vice-President shall then become the first Vice- President. The newly appointed President, with the assistance of the Nominating Committee (or Membership Committee as applicable), shall select a member of the Council to serve the unexpired term of the second Vice-President. The Advisory Council shall approve or disap- prove the selection for second Vice-President. 5.6 Succession Protocol - All Other Officers Vacancy in mid-term of the 1st Vice President will be filled by the 2nd March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 449 @bcl@14038681.doc 6 Vice President with the balance of succession as noted in 5.5 above. Vacancy mid-term of the 2nd Vice President, Secretary or Treasurer shall be filled by the Nominating Committee (or Membership Commit- tee if Nominating is not then in session) recommending to the Council the name of a Council Member. If, however, the vacated officer’s p osi- tion has less than three (3) months duration remaining, the President shall appoint a member of the current Council to serve the unexpired balance of the term. In either case, the Council shall approve or disa p- prove the appointments. 5.7 Termination of Officers Officers may be removed for just cause by a majority vote of the full Advisory Council on Aging when 90% of all appointed members are present, or at a special meeting convened for that purpose at which a quorum is present. Any officer removed ceases to hold the office once the vote has been tallied and announced. Succession shall be as out- lined in Sections 5.5 and 5.6. 5.8 Director of Aging & Adult Services The Director of Aging and Adult Services shall serve as a consultant to the Council. The Director shall submit a monthly report to the Council at the regular meetings. Special reports may be given at the December annual meeting. ARTICLE VI – MEETINGS, COMMITTEES, WORK GROUPS 6.1 Regular Meetings There shall be at least eight (8) meetings a year, at such time and place as agreed upon. 6.2 Special Meetings The President shall call a special meeting of the Council at any time upon the written request of at least five (5) members of the Council. Also, the President may call a special meeting of the Council at any time an emergency meeting is felt to be imperative. 6.3 Executive Committee There shall be an Executive Committee of the Council composed of the elected officers, the immediate past president, chair of standing com- mittees and chairs of designated county-wide work groups (designated by the Council), if they are also members of the Advisory Council. On- ly members of the Executive Committee shall have voting rights at Ex- ecutive Committee. Other members of the Advisory Council may be March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 450 @bcl@14038681.doc 7 invited to give reports or recommendations at the Executive Commit- tee meetings. 6.4 Annual Meeting At the December meeting, the council will render to the public a report of the Council’s activities and accomplishments of the past year and shall install new officers for the coming year. 6.5 Committee and Work Group Structure The President of the Council, upon taking office, shall appoint the Chairs of each Committee and Work Group. Work Group Chairs or one of the two Co-Chairs, shall be members of the Council. Chairs of Work Groups who are also Council members are also voting members of the Executive Committee. Committees may take action consistent with the Advisory Council on Aging’s policies and procedures. Work Groups must bring action items to the Executive Council for determination if the item will move forward for final action of the Council in full. 6.6 Committee Quorums A majority of a committee shall constitute a quorum. The act of a ma- jority of the members present at a meeting at which a quorum is present shall be the act of the committee. Unless otherwise provided in the resolution of the Advisory Council on Aging, work groups and ad hoc committees shall act under the direction of their respective Chairs without any requirement for a quorum. 6.7 Committees and Work Groups Each committee or work group shall have a chairperson. The President of the Advisory Council shall be an ex-officio member of all committees of the Advisory Council and shall be notified of all meetings. A list of Council members on each committee and work group shall be kept, in addition to attendance of Advisory Council members maintained for each meeting and copies given to the Advisory Council staff person. Committee and work group meeting notices shall be mailed, e-mailed, telephoned, and/or personally given, approximately one work week in advance of the meeting date to all members of the committee. 6.8 Task Force or Ad Hoc Committees In the implementation of the Area Plan, the Council shall develop task forces or ad hoc committees, where needed, in the accomplishment of specific objectives. The Chair of the Advisory Council may designate or March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 451 @bcl@14038681.doc 8 solicit participation for ad hoc committees. Ad hoc committees are not subject to the Brown Act, but are subject to the County’s Better Gov- ernment Ordinance (C.C.C. Ord. Code, § 25-2.) 6.9 Standing Committees and Work Groups The following shall be the Standing Committees and Work Groups of the Council: Executive Committee, Planning Committee, Membership Committee, Health Work Group, Housing Work Group, Legislative Work Group, Marketing Work Group and Transportation Work Group. ARTICLE VII – CONDUCT OF MEETINGS 7.1 Order of Business The President or a majority vote of the Council may change the order of business as may be required. 7.2 Council Quorum A quorum for the transaction of business by the Council shall consist of a majority (one more than half) of the total number of seats of the Coun- cil. Membership of the Council shall be evidenced by the list of autho- rized seats approved by the Board of Supervisors at the time of roll call. Ex-officio or emeritus members of the Council under sections 3.5, 3.6 and 3.7 shall not be counted when establishing a quorum under this sec- tion. 7.3 Quorum Declaration After a quorum is declared to exist, all transactions of business can pr o- ceed, regardless whether enough attendees leave to decrease the mem- bers present below the quorum requirement. In such an event, any mo- tions for action will be determined by a majority vote of the members then present. 7.4 Meetings in the Absence of a Quorum A quorum is not required in order to conduct a meeting, with the excep- tion that no motions may be introduced or voted upon. Discussion can take place, with the item carried forward to the next meeting. All other non-action items of business of the Council may proceed without a quo- rum present. If sufficient members arrive after roll call to make up a quorum, the meeting may proceed without restrictions. ARTICLE VIII - NOMINATING COMMITTEE 8.1 The nominating committee shall normally be chosen after installation of March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 452 @bcl@14038681.doc 9 new officers but no later than August of each year. The Nominating Committee is a Sub-Committee of the Membership Committee. 8.2 The nominating committee shall be chosen annually for the purpose of presenting an annual slate of officers for election or filling vacant officer positions that occur while the Nominating Committee is in session. 8.3 The nominating committee shall have five members elected by caucus of advisory council members from each of the five supervisorial districts. 8.4 The nominating committee shall present a slate of officers at a council meeting prior to the Annual Meeting in December and will also request additional nominations from the floor. Election of new officers shall take place at the annual meeting in December. 8.5 The nominating committee members may serve two (2) consecutive terms of one (1) calendar year for the applicable months the committee is in session. The nominating committee at its first meeting following election of its members shall choose one of its members as chair. ARTICLE IX– AMENDMENTS 9.1 The Bylaws may be amended by a majority vote of the total membership of the Council present at any regular meeting or special meeting called for that purpose, provided that each member of the Council has been notified, in writing of the wording of the proposed amendment(s) at least ten (10) days in advance of the meeting. 9.2 These Bylaws must not conflict with the Board of Supervisors’ Ordin- ances regarding Advisory Councils. The Council may adopt such By- laws as shall seem appropriate and necessary for the functioning of the Council. Approved and adopted by the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors as evidenced by passage of Board Order: Board Agenda Item Number___________On_______________, 2015 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 453 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE amended Conflict of Interest Code for the Contra Costa Community College District, including the list of designated positions. FISCAL IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND: The Contra Costa Community College District has amended its conflict of interest code and submitted the revised code, attached as Exhibit A, to the Board for approval pursuant to Government Code section 87306 and 87306.5. The list of designated positions/disclosure categories has been revised to include new positions. These changes are shown on the attached ‘red-line’ version. (See Exhibit B) APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 03/08/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Cynthia Schwerin, Deputy County Counsel, (925) 335-1800 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: March 8, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: Cynthia Schwerin, Deputy County Counsel, David Twa, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, Christina Chellew, Contra Costa Community College District C. 46 To:Board of Supervisors From:Sharon L. Anderson, County Counsel Date:March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Conflict of Interest Code of the Contra Costa Community College District March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 454 ATTACHMENTS COI - CCD Exhibit A COI - CCD redline Exhibit B March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 455 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 456 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 457 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 458 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 459 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 460 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 461 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 462 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 463 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 464 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 465 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 466 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 467 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE amended Conflict of Interest Code for the Department of Conservation and Development, including the list of designated positions. FISCAL IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND: The Department of Conservation and Development has amended its conflict of interest code and submitted the revised code, attached as Exhibit A, to the Board for approval pursuant to Government Code section 87306 and 87306.5. This amendment updates the conflict of interest code to conform to FPPC Regulation 18730 and updates the list of designated positions to add and eliminate positions. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 03/08/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Cynthia Schwerin, Deputy County Counsel, (925) 335-1800 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: March 8, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: Cynthia Schwerin, Deputy County Counsel, David Twa, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, Marjorie Koll, Department of Conservation and Development C. 45 To:Board of Supervisors From:Sharon L. Anderson, County Counsel Date:March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Conflict of Interest Code of the Department of Conservation and Development March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 468 ATTACHMENTS COI - DCD Exhibit A March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 469 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 470 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 471 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 472 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 473 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 474 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 475 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 476 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 477 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 478 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 479 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 480 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 481 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 482 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 483 RECOMMENDATION(S): ACCEPT the Fiscal Year 2015/16 Community Facilities District Administration Report on County of Contra Costa Community Facilities District No. 2001-1 (Norris Canyon) as required by Sections 50075.3 and 53411 of the California Government Code. FISCAL IMPACT: None. The report relates to Special Taxes approved by voters and bonds issued and secured by said Special Taxes. BACKGROUND: On June 5, 2001 the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors (Board) authorized the establishment of Community Facilities District No. 2001-1 (Norris Canyon). The creation of the Community Facilities District (CFD) authorized the levy of a Mello-Roos Special Tax on the Norris Canyon Estates subdivision in the San Ramon area. The action of the Board also authorized the issuance of bonded indebtedness secured by the approved Special Tax in the amount of $7,220,000. The (CFD) bonds were issued on June 14, 2001. On December 11, 2012, the Board authorized the refinancing of the 2001 Special Tax Bonds in order to lower the annual debt service on the bonds. The 2013 Special Tax Refunding Bonds were issued on January 24, 2013. The California Government Code Sections 50075.3 and 53411 require that specified information be provided to the Board of Supervisors on an annual basis. The report requirements include information on Mello-Roos CFD Special APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 03/08/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Kristen Lackey (925) 674-7888 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: March 8, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: C. 43 To:Board of Supervisors From:Robert Campbell, Auditor-Controller Date:March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:County of Contra Costa Community Facilities District No. 2001-1 (Norris Canyon) March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 484 Taxes collected and CFD Bond issued. The attached CFD Administration Report fulfills the requirement of the Government Code. The reporting requirements are summarized below: March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 485 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Section 50075.3 Item (a): Identify amount of special taxes that have been collected and expended. Response to Item (a): The fiscal year 2014-15 special tax levy was $423,176. Since the CFD is on the County Teeter Plan, the full amount of the tax levy was remitted to the CFD. The total levy was used to pay debt services in March and September 2015 on the CFD bonds as well as administrative costs for the CFD. Item (b): Identify the status of any project required or authorized to be funded by the special taxes. Response to Item (b): All CFD No. 2001-1 improvements have been completed and accepted by the Public Works Department of the County. Section 53411 Item (a): Identify the amount of bonds that have been collected and expended. Response to Item (a): A total of $7,220,000 in special tax bonds was issued by the County on June 14, 2001. Upon issuance of the bonds, $6,000,000 from bond proceeds was deposited into the Improvement Fund and has been used to acquire the CFD No. 2001-1 improvements from the developer. An additional $170,000 was used to pay the costs of issuing the bonds. Approximately $417,000 was deposited in the Reserve Fund, and the remaining $487,000 was deposited in the Bond Fund to be used for capitalized interest. The Series 2001 Bonds were refunded and defeased on January 24, 2013 by the issuance of $5,605,000 in special tax refunding bonds. An Original Issue Premium of $20,460, together with available moneys from the Series 2001 Bonds in the amount of $767,049, left a total of $6,392,508 in bond proceeds to be expended. Upon issuance of the bonds, $5,947,529 from bond proceeds was deposited into the Refunding Fund, to be used to redeem all of the outstanding Series 2001 Bonds. An additional $207,063 was deposited into the Reserve Fund. The remaining $237,917 was used to pay the costs of issuing the Series 2013 Special Tax Refunding Bonds. Item (b): Identify the status of any project required or authorized to be funded from bond proceeds: Response to Item (b): All CFD No. 2001-1 improvements have been completed and accepted by the Public Works Department of the County. Not part of the Government Code required report, but provided as a matter of information is the following information on the incidence of delinquencies within the District. The total amount collected by the County for the fiscal year 2014-15 CFD special tax levy was $420,564 pursuant to the Teeter Plan. The property owner of two parcels was delinquent a total of $2,612 in payments of the fiscal year 2014-15 CFD special tax levy. The delinquency percentage in the District is 0.62%, which is below the threshold for which the County is obligated to take affirmative action to remedy. ATTACHMENTS Admin Report 2015 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 486 555)University)Ave,)Suite)280)•)Sacramento,)CA)95825 Phone:)l916p)561-0890)•)Fax:)l916p)561-0891 www.goodwinconsultinggroup.net COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2001-1 (NORRIS CANYON) CFD TAX ADMINISTRATION REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2015-16 December 31, 2015 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 487 Community Facilities District No. 2001-1 CFD Tax Administration Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page Executive Summary ............................................................................................................. i I. Introduction ..........................................................................................................................1 II. Purpose of Report ................................................................................................................2 III. Special Tax Requirement .....................................................................................................3 IV. Special Tax Levy .................................................................................................................4 V. Development Update ...........................................................................................................7 VI. Status of Public Improvements ............................................................................................8 VII. CFD Funds ...........................................................................................................................9 VIII. Prepayments .......................................................................................................................11 IX. Delinquencies .....................................................................................................................12 X. Foreclosure Covenant ........................................................................................................13 XI. Senate Bill 165 Reporting Requirements ...........................................................................14 Appendix A – Summary of Fiscal Year 2015-16 Special Tax Levy Appendix B – Fiscal Year 2015-16 Special Tax Levy for Individual Assessor’s Parcels Appendix C – Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Tax Appendix D – Boundary Map of Community Facilities District No. 2001-1 Appendix E – Assessor’s Parcel Maps for Fiscal Year 2015-16 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 488 County of Contra Costa i Fiscal Year 2015-16 CFD No. 2001-1 CFD Tax Administration Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The following summary provides a brief overview of the main points from this report regarding the County of Contra Costa Community Facilities District No. 2001-1 (Norris Canyon) (“CFD No. 2001-1” or the “CFD”): Fiscal Year 2015-16 Special Tax Levy Number of Taxed Parcels Total Special Tax Levy 341 $423,174 For further detail regarding the special tax levy, or special tax rates, please refer to Section IV of this report. Development Status for Fiscal Year 2015-16 Land Use Category Parcels or Acres Residential Property 341 parcels * Other Property 0 parcels Undeveloped Property 4.9 acres * Does not include 11 parcels that have prepaid their special tax obligation. For more information regarding the status of development in CFD No. 2001-1, please see Section V of this report. Delinquency Summary Delinquent Amount for FY 2014-15 (as of October 15, 2015) Total Levy for FY 2014-15 Delinquency Rate $2,612 $423,176 0.62% For additional delinquency information, including historical delinquency rates, please see Section IX of this report. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 489 County of Contra Costa ii Fiscal Year 2015-16 CFD No. 2001-1 CFD Tax Administration Report Outstanding Bonds Summary 2013 Special Tax Refunding Bonds Issuance Date Original Principal Amount Retired Current Amount Outstanding January 2013 $5,605,000 $690,000* $4,915,000* * As of the date of this report. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 490 County of Contra Costa 1 Fiscal Year 2015-16 CFD No. 2001-1 CFD Tax Administration Report I. INTRODUCTION Community Facilities District No. 2001-1 On June 5, 2001, the County of Contra Costa (the “County”) Board of Supervisors established CFD No. 2001-1. In a landowner election held on the same day, the sole owner of property within the CFD voted to authorize the levy of a Mello-Roos special tax on property within CFD No. 2001-1. The landowner also voted to incur bonded indebtedness, secured by special taxes levied on property within the CFD, in an amount not to exceed $7,220,000. On June 14, 2001, special tax bonds (the “Series 2001 Bonds”) in the principal amount of $7,220,000 were issued on behalf of CFD No. 2001-1. In January 2013, the outstanding Series 2001 Bonds were refunded and defeased with the issuance of $5,605,000 in bonds (the “Series 2013 Special Tax Refunding Bonds” or the “Bonds”). A special tax will be levied on property within the CFD in fiscal year 2015-16 in order to pay debt service obligations in calendar year 2016. The CFD boundary encompasses a 389-acre site that is proposed for the Norris Canyon Estates residential community. The CFD is located in an unincorporated area of the County just west of the City of San Ramon. At build out, the project was originally expected to include 361 single family detached homes. As of June 1, 2015, 352 building permits have been issued, 20 of which were issued during the past fiscal year for new residential home construction. The Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 The reduction in property tax revenues that resulted from the passage of Proposition 13 in 1978 required public agencies and real estate developers to look for other means to generate funding for public infrastructure. The funding available from traditional assessment districts was limited by certain requirements of the assessment acts, and it became clear that a more flexible funding tool was needed. In response, the California State Legislature (the “Legislature”) approved the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (the “Act”) which provides for the levy of a special tax within a defined geographic area (i.e., a community facilities district) if such levy is approved by two-thirds of the qualified electors in the area. The Act can generate funding for a broad range of facilities and special taxes can be allocated to property in any reasonable manner other than on an ad valorem basis. A community facilities district is authorized to issue tax-exempt bonds that are secured by land within the district. If a parcel does not pay the special tax levied on it, a public agency can foreclose on the parcel and use the proceeds of the foreclosure to ensure that bondholders receive interest and principal payments on the bonds. Because bonds issued by a community facilities district are land-secured, there is no risk to a public agency’s general fund or taxing capacity. In addition, because the bonds are tax-exempt, they typically carry an interest rate that is lower than conventional construction financing. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 491 County of Contra Costa 2 Fiscal Year 2015-16 CFD No. 2001-1 CFD Tax Administration Report II. PURPOSE OF REPORT This CFD Tax Administration Report (the “Report”) presents findings from research and financial analysis performed by Goodwin Consulting Group, Inc. to determine the fiscal year 2015-16 special tax levy for CFD No. 2001-1. The Report is intended to provide information to interested parties regarding the current financial obligations of the CFD, special taxes levied in fiscal year 2015-16, and information on the public facilities authorized to be funded by the CFD. The Report also summarizes development activity as well as other pertinent information (e.g., prepayments, delinquencies, and foreclosures) on property within the CFD. In addition, the Report provides all of the information that must be filed with the County Board of Supervisors pursuant to the requirements of Senate Bill 165. The remainder of the Report is organized as follows:  Section III identifies the financial obligations of CFD No. 2001-1 for fiscal year 2015- 16.  Section IV provides a summary of the special tax categories and the methodology that is used to apportion the special tax among parcels in the CFD. The maximum special tax rates for fiscal year 2015-16 are also identified in this section.  Section V provides an update of the development activity occurring within CFD No. 2001-1, including new building permit activity.  Section VI provides information on the public improvements authorized to be funded by CFD No. 2001-1.  Section VII provides information regarding funds established for the Bonds, including current balances in such funds.  Section VIII identifies parcels, if any, that have prepaid their special tax obligation.  Section IX provides information regarding special tax delinquencies in CFD No. 2001-1.  Section X provides information on covenants regarding foreclosure on delinquent parcels.  Section XI provides a summary of the reporting requirements set forth in Senate Bill 165, the Local Agency Special Tax and Bond Accountability Act, and the information needed for the County to respond to these requirements. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 492 County of Contra Costa 3 Fiscal Year 2015-16 CFD No. 2001-1 CFD Tax Administration Report III. SPECIAL TAX REQUIREMENT Pursuant to the Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Tax (the “RMA”) for CFD No. 2001-1, which was adopted as an exhibit to the Resolution of Formation of CFD No. 2001-1, the Special Tax Requirement means the total amount needed each fiscal year to (i) pay principal and interest on bonds, (ii) create or replenish reserve funds, (iii) cure any delinquencies in the payment of principal or interest on indebtedness of CFD No. 2001-1 which have occurred in the prior fiscal year or (based on delinquencies in the payment of special taxes which have already taken place) are expected to occur in the fiscal year in which the tax will be collected, and (iv) pay administrative expenses. For fiscal year 2015-16, the Special Tax Requirement is $423,171 and is calculated as follows: Community Facilities District No. 2001-1 Special Tax Requirement for Fiscal Year 2015-16* Debt Service $407,725 Interest Payment on Bonds Due March 1, 2016 $78,863 Interest Payment on Bonds Due Sept. 1, 2016 $78,863 Principal Payment on Bonds Due Sept. 1, 2016 $250,000 Administrative Expenses $15,446 Surplus Funds to Reduce Special Tax Requirement $0 Fiscal Year 2015-16 Special Tax Requirement $423,171 *Total may not sum due to rounding. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 493 County of Contra Costa 4 Fiscal Year 2015-16 CFD No. 2001-1 CFD Tax Administration Report IV. SPECIAL TAX LEVY Special Tax Categories Special taxes within CFD No. 2001-1 are levied pursuant to the methodology set forth in the RMA. The RMA establishes various special tax categories against which the special tax can be levied each fiscal year, including Residential Property, Other Property, and Undeveloped Property. (Capitalized terms are defined in the RMA in Appendix C of this Report.) Residential Property is defined as any parcel within the CFD for which a building permit for construction of a residential structure was issued prior to June 1 of the preceding fiscal year. Other Property means all taxable parcels in the CFD for which a building permit was issued prior to June 1 of the preceding fiscal year for a structure that is not used for residential purposes and is not owned by a homeowners’ association or public agency. Undeveloped Property is defined as all taxable parcels in the CFD for which a building permit has not been issued prior to June 1 of the preceding fiscal year. Maximum Special Tax Rates The maximum special tax rates applicable to each category of property in CFD No. 2001-1 are set forth in Section C of the RMA. The actual amount of the maximum special tax which will be levied on each land use category in fiscal year 2015-16, is determined by the method of apportionment included in Section E of the RMA. The following table identifies the maximum special taxes that can be levied on property in CFD No. 2001-1. Community Facilities District No. 2001-1 Maximum Special Tax Rates Tax Category Description Maximum Special Tax 1 Residential Property $2,100 per parcel 2 Other Property $2,100 per residential unit planned on the parcel before it became Other Property 3 Undeveloped Property $3,360 per acre March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 494 County of Contra Costa 5 Fiscal Year 2015-16 CFD No. 2001-1 CFD Tax Administration Report Changes to Norris Canyon Tentative Map The maximum special tax rates shown above assume that a particular number of residential units will be developed within Norris Canyon consistent with the tentative map approved by the County Board of Supervisors in August 1997. To the extent changes are proposed to the tentative map in future years that would reduce the number of residential units within the project, the County must either deny the revision to the tentative map or require a prepayment of special taxes by the developer proposing the tentative map change. Such prepayment would be in an amount sufficient to retire a portion of the bonds and maintain 110% debt service coverage with the reduced special tax revenues that will result after the tentative map revision. To date, development in Norris Canyon has been consistent with the approved tentative map. Apportionment of Special Taxes The amount of special tax levied on each parcel in the CFD each fiscal year will be determined by application of Section E of the RMA. Pursuant to this section, the Special Tax Requirement will be allocated as follows: The first step requires special taxes to be levied on each parcel of Residential Property and Other Property up to 100% of the applicable maximum special tax rate. If additional revenue is needed after the first step is completed, and after applying capitalized interest to the Special Tax Requirement, then a special tax will be levied on each parcel of Undeveloped Property up to 100% of the applicable maximum special tax. If additional revenues are still needed to pay annual obligations of the CFD after the maximum special tax is levied on Residential Property, Other Property, and Undeveloped Property, a special tax will be levied on Homeowners’ Association Property and parcels of Public Property that originally had planned units, as defined in the RMA. Application of the maximum special tax rate to the 341 Residential Property parcels for fiscal year 2015-16 will generate special tax revenue of $716,100. Since the Special Tax Requirement for fiscal year 2015-16 is only $423,171, Residential Property will be taxed at approximately 59.1% of the maximum, or $1,241 per parcel. The resulting special tax on Residential Property will fully fund the Special Tax Requirement for fiscal year 2015-16, assuming no delinquencies. No special tax will be levied on Undeveloped Property in fiscal year 2015-16. The actual special tax rates and the number of units and/or acres of taxable property on which those rates are levied for fiscal year 2015-16 are shown in the table on the following page. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 495 County of Contra Costa 6 Fiscal Year 2015-16 CFD No. 2001-1 CFD Tax Administration Report Community Facilities District No. 2001-1 Fiscal Year 2015-16 Special Tax Levy Land Use Category Maximum Special Tax Rates Fiscal Year 2015-16 Actual Special Tax Rates Parcels/Acres Taxed Total Special Tax Levy Residential Property $2,100 per parcel $1,241 per parcel 341 parcels * $423,174 Undeveloped Property $3,360 per acre $0 per acre 0 acres $0 Total Special Tax Levy for Fiscal Year 2015-16 $423,174 * Total does not include 11 parcels that have had their special tax obligation prepaid and therefore are no longer subject to the annual tax. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 496 County of Contra Costa 7 Fiscal Year 2015-16 CFD No. 2001-1 CFD Tax Administration Report V. DEVELOPMENT UPDATE From June 1, 2014, to May 31, 2015, 20 building permits have been issued to construct single family homes within CFD No. 2001-1. In total, 352 building permits have been issued and no Other Property currently exists within CFD No. 2001-1. Based on the current status of development in CFD No. 2001-1, the following table summarizes the allocation of parcels to the special tax categories defined in the RMA: Community Facilities District No. 2001-1 Allocation to Special Tax Categories Fiscal Year 2015-16 Tax Category Description Number of Parcels 1 Residential Property 341* 2 Other Property 0 3 Undeveloped Property 9 * Total does not include 11 parcels that have had their special tax obligation prepaid and therefore are no longer subject to the annual tax. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 497 County of Contra Costa 8 Fiscal Year 2015-16 CFD No. 2001-1 CFD Tax Administration Report VI. STATUS OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CFD No. 2001-1 was formed to finance the widening of Norris Canyon Road, starting at the intersection of Bollinger Canyon Road and continuing a distance of 7,700 feet. Improvements to Norris Canyon Road include: (1) grading, pavement, curbs and gutters, rock shoulder, traffic signing and striping, and street lights; (2) construction of sanitary sewer mains, structures, fittings, and appurtenances; (3) construction of water distribution facilities and appurtenances; (4) construction of joint utility distribution facilities for electrical, telephone, gas, cable and television, including trenching, conduit and cable installation, pull and splice boxes, fittings and appurtenances, and relocation of overhead facilities; (5) construction of landscaping and irrigation facilities, including soil preparation, landscape materials, irrigation pipes, fittings, and appurtenances; (6) required attendant public fees and design and construction engineering fees; and (7) acquisition of all necessary interests in real property. The developer entered into an Acquisition Agreement with the County that contains provisions that set forth the process by which completed improvements will be acquired with bond proceeds that are on deposit in the Improvement Fund for the CFD. The Acquisition Agreement obligates the developer to pay any costs of the improvements that are not covered by funds available in the Improvement Fund. All Norris Canyon Road improvements have been completed and accepted by the Public Works division of the County. Per the Acquisition Agreement with the County, the balance in the CFD Improvement Fund was used to acquire the completed improvements from the developer. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 498 County of Contra Costa 9 Fiscal Year 2015-16 CFD No. 2001-1 CFD Tax Administration Report VII. CFD FUNDS Six funds were established pursuant to the Fiscal Agent Agreement between the County and the Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company (the “Fiscal Agent”). Following is a brief description of the purpose of each fund. The Improvement Fund was created exclusively to pay the cost of improvements until all authorized facilities have been paid. The Improvement Fund, due to completion of all improvements, has been closed. The Reserve Fund was established as a reserve for the payment of principal and interest on the bonds in the event the balance in the Special Tax Fund is insufficient to make debt service payments. The Fiscal Agent will maintain the Reserve Fund. The Reserve Requirement is $206,513 as of June 30, 2015. The Bond Fund was created exclusively to pay principal and interest on CFD indebtedness. The Bond Fund will be held by the Fiscal Agent; twice each year, the fiscal agent will use proceeds in this account to pay interest and/or principal on the bonds. If, on any interest payment date, amounts in the Bond Fund are insufficient to pay debt service that is due on such date, the Fiscal Agent must withdraw from the Reserve Fund to cover the shortfall. The Special Tax Fund was established as a fund to be held by the County Auditor- Controller (the “Auditor”) into which special tax revenues collected by the County will be deposited. Not later than three business days prior to each interest payment date on the bonds, the Auditor will transfer money from the Special Tax Fund to the Fiscal Agent to pay interest and principal due on the bonds, as well as any amount needed to bring the Reserve Fund up to the required reserve amount. Any remaining balance in the Special Tax Fund will be transferred to the Administrative Expense Fund. The Administrative Expense Fund will be held by the Auditor and used to pay CFD administrative expenses. Each year, the Auditor will transfer any excess amount in the Administrative Expense Fund to the Special Tax Fund. The Costs of Issuance Fund will be held by the Fiscal Agent and will be disbursed to pay costs associated with formation of CFD No. 2001-1 and issuance of the Bonds. This fund has been closed. Money held in any of the aforementioned funds can be invested by the Fiscal Agent at the direction of the County and in conformance with limitations set forth in the Fiscal Agent Agreement. Investment interest earnings, if any, will generally be applied to the fund for which the investment is made. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 499 County of Contra Costa 10 Fiscal Year 2015-16 CFD No. 2001-1 CFD Tax Administration Report Fund Balances As of June 30, 2015, the various funds had the following balances: Community Facilities District No. 2001-1 Fund Balances as of June 30, 2015 Reserve Fund $207,467 Bond Fund $2 Special Tax Fund* $345,948 Administrative Expense Fund* $12,919 * Fund balances shown for these accounts are as of July 20, 2015. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 500 County of Contra Costa 11 Fiscal Year 2015-16 CFD No. 2001-1 CFD Tax Administration Report VIII. PREPAYMENTS The special tax lien for 11 properties in CFD No. 2001-1 have been fully prepaid and are no longer subject to the annual special tax levy. The 11 parcels that have fully prepaid their special tax obligation are as follows: 211-240-011-0 211-260-011-5 211-310-009-9 211-320-001-4 211-370-025-2 211-370-026-0 211-370-033-6 211-370-037-7 211-370-038-5 211-370-055-9 211-380-037-5 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 501 County of Contra Costa 12 Fiscal Year 2015-16 CFD No. 2001-1 CFD Tax Administration Report IX. DELINQUENCIES As of October 15, 2015, the Contra Costa County Auditor’s Office reports the following delinquency amounts for CFD No. 2001-1: Community Facilities District No. 2001-1 Delinquencies as of October 15, 2015 Fiscal Year Parcels Delinquent Delinquent Amount CFD Tax Levied Percent Delinquent 2014-15 2 $2,612 $423,176 0.62% March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 502 County of Contra Costa 13 Fiscal Year 2015-16 CFD No. 2001-1 CFD Tax Administration Report X. FORECLOSURE COVENANT Covenants of the County The County may order the institution of a court action to foreclose the lien on a parcel within specified time limits if any payment of the special tax is delinquent. In such an action, the real property subject to the unpaid amount may be sold at a judicial foreclosure sale. Pursuant to the Bonds’ covenants, the County shall review its records in connection with the collection of the special tax on or about March 30 and June 30 of each year to compare the amount of special tax levied in the CFD to the amount of special tax collected, and proceed as follows: Individual Delinquencies. If the Auditor determines that any single parcel subject to the special tax in the CFD is delinquent in the payment of special taxes in the aggregate amount of (i) $7,500 or more if all the property within the CFD is on the Teeter Plan, or (ii) $3,000 or more if any of the property in the CFD is not on the Teeter Plan, then the Auditor shall send or cause to be sent a notice of delinquency (and a demand for immediate payment thereof) to the property owner within 60 days of such determination, and (if the delinquency remains uncured) foreclosure proceedings shall be commenced by the County within 120 days of such determination. Aggregate Delinquencies. If the Auditor determines that the total amount of delinquent special tax for the prior fiscal year for the entire CFD, (including the total of delinquencies under the preceding paragraph), exceeds 5% of the total special tax due and payable for the prior fiscal year, the County shall notify or cause to be notified property owners who are then delinquent in the payment of special taxes (and demand immediate payment of the delinquency) within 60 days of such determination, and shall commence foreclosure proceedings within 120 days of such determination against each parcel of land in the CFD with a special tax delinquency. Since the CFD’s special tax delinquency rate for fiscal year 2014-15 is below 5%, the County has not been required to initiate foreclosure proceedings on property in CFD No. 2001-1. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 503 County of Contra Costa 14 Fiscal Year 2015-16 CFD No. 2001-1 CFD Tax Administration Report XI. SENATE BILL 165 REPORTING REQUIREMENTS On September 18, 2000, former Governor Gray Davis approved Senate Bill 165 which enacted the Local Agency Special Tax and Bond Accountability Act. In approving the bill, the Legislature pointed out that local agencies need to demonstrate to the voters that special taxes and bond proceeds are being spent on the facilities and services for which they were intended. To further this objective, the Legislature added Sections 50075.3 and 53411 to the California Government Code setting forth annual reporting requirements relative to special taxes collected and bonds issued by a local public agency. A response to each of the reporting requirements in SB 165 is provided below. Pursuant to Sections 50075.3 and 53411, the chief fiscal officer of the County will, by January 1, 2002, and at least once a year thereafter, file a report with the Board of Supervisors (which may be this CFD Tax Administration Report) setting forth the following information. Section 50075.3 Item (a): Identify amount of special taxes that have been collected and expended. The fiscal year 2014-15 special tax levy was $423,176. Since the CFD is on the County Teeter Plan, the full amount of the tax levy was remitted to the CFD. The total levy was used to pay debt service in March and September 2015 on the CFD bonds as well as administrative costs for the CFD. Item (b): Identify the status of any project required or authorized to be funded by the special taxes. All CFD No. 2001-1 improvements have been completed and accepted by the Public Works division of the County. Section 53411 Item (a): Identify the amount of bonds that have been collected and expended. A total of $7,220,000 in special tax bonds was issued by the County on June 14, 2001. Upon issuance of the bonds, $6,000,000 from bond proceeds was deposited into the Improvement Fund and has been used to acquire the CFD No. 2001-1 improvements from the developer. An additional $170,000 was used to pay the costs of issuing the bonds. Approximately $417,000 was deposited in the Reserve Fund, and the remaining $487,000 was deposited in the Bond Fund to be used for capitalized interest. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 504 County of Contra Costa 15 Fiscal Year 2015-16 CFD No. 2001-1 CFD Tax Administration Report The Series 2001 Bonds were refunded and defeased on January 24, 2013 by the issuance of $5,605,000 in special tax refunding bonds. An Original Issue Premium of $20,460, together with available moneys from the Series 2001 Bonds in the amount of $767,049, left a total of $6,392,508 in bond proceeds to be expended. Upon issuance of the bonds, $5,947,529 from bond proceeds was deposited into the Refunding Fund, to be used to redeem all of the outstanding Series 2001 Bonds. An additional $207,063 was deposited into the Reserve Fund. The remaining $237,917 was used to pay the costs of issuing the Series 2013 Special Tax Refunding Bonds. Item (b): Identify the status of any project required or authorized to be funded from bond proceeds. All CFD No. 2001-1 improvements have been completed and accepted by the Public Works division of the County. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 505 APPENDIX A Summary of Fiscal Year 2015-16 Special Tax Levy March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 506 Total Special Land Use Category Tax Levy Residential Property $2,100.00 per parcel $1,240.98 per parcel 341 parcels $423,174.18 Undeveloped Property $3,360.00 per acre $0.00 per acre 4.9 acres $0.00 Total Fiscal Year 2015-16 Special Tax Levy $423,174.18 Goodwin Consulting Group, Inc. Fiscal Year 2015-16 Maximum Special Tax Rates County of Contra Costa Community Facilities District No. 2001-1 (Norris Canyon) Special Tax Levy Summary for Fiscal Year 2015-16 Parcels/Acres Taxed Fiscal Year 2015-16 Actual Special Tax Rates March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 507 APPENDIX B Fiscal Year 2015-16 Special Tax Levy for Individual Assessor’s Parcels March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 508 Assessor's Type of Status of Taxable Special Parcel Number Property Development Acres Tax 211-210-045-4 HOA HOA $0.00 211-210-063-7 HOA HOA $0.00 211-210-074-4 HOA HOA $0.00 211-210-081-9 HOA HOA $0.00 211-210-082-7 HOA HOA $0.00 211-210-083-5 HOA HOA $0.00 211-210-084-0 HOA HOA $0.00 211-240-001-1 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-240-003-7 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-240-004-5 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-240-005-2 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-240-006-0 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-240-007-8 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-240-008-6 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-240-009-4 Undeveloped Undeveloped $0.00 211-240-010-2 Undeveloped Undeveloped $0.00 211-240-011-0 Prepaid Prepaid $0.00 /1 211-240-012-8 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-240-013-6 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-240-014-4 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-240-015-1 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-240-016-9 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-240-017-7 HOA HOA $0.00 211-240-019-3 HOA HOA $0.00 211-250-001-8 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-250-002-6 Undeveloped Undeveloped $0.00 211-250-003-4 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-250-004-2 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-250-005-9 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-250-006-7 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-250-007-5 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-250-008-3 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-250-009-1 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-250-010-9 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-250-011-7 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-250-012-5 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-250-013-3 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-250-014-1 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-250-015-8 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-250-016-6 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-250-017-4 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-250-018-2 Residential Developed $1,240.98 County of Contra Costa Community Facilities District No. 2001-1 (Norris Canyon) Special Tax Levy for Fiscal Year 2015-16 1 of 10March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 509 Assessor's Type of Status of Taxable Special Parcel Number Property Development Acres Tax County of Contra Costa Community Facilities District No. 2001-1 (Norris Canyon) Special Tax Levy for Fiscal Year 2015-16 211-250-019-0 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-250-020-8 HOA HOA $0.00 211-250-021-6 HOA HOA $0.00 211-250-023-2 HOA HOA $0.00 211-260-001-6 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-260-002-4 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-260-003-2 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-260-004-0 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-260-005-7 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-260-006-5 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-260-007-3 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-260-008-1 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-260-009-9 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-260-010-7 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-260-011-5 Prepaid Prepaid $0.00 /1 211-260-012-3 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-260-013-1 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-260-014-9 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-260-015-6 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-260-016-4 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-260-017-2 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-260-018-0 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-260-025-5 HOA HOA $0.00 211-270-001-4 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-270-002-2 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-270-003-0 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-270-004-8 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-270-005-5 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-270-006-3 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-270-007-1 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-270-008-9 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-270-009-7 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-270-010-5 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-270-011-3 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-270-012-1 HOA HOA $0.00 211-280-001-2 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-280-002-0 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-280-003-8 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-280-004-6 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-280-005-3 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-280-006-1 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-280-007-9 Residential Developed $1,240.98 2 of 10March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 510 Assessor's Type of Status of Taxable Special Parcel Number Property Development Acres Tax County of Contra Costa Community Facilities District No. 2001-1 (Norris Canyon) Special Tax Levy for Fiscal Year 2015-16 211-280-008-7 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-280-009-5 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-280-010-3 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-280-011-1 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-280-012-9 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-280-013-7 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-280-014-5 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-280-015-2 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-280-016-0 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-280-017-8 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-280-018-6 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-280-019-4 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-280-020-2 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-280-021-0 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-280-022-8 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-280-023-6 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-280-024-4 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-280-025-1 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-280-026-9 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-280-027-7 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-280-028-5 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-280-029-3 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-280-030-1 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-280-031-9 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-280-032-7 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-280-033-5 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-280-034-3 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-280-035-0 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-280-036-8 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-280-037-6 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-280-038-4 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-280-039-2 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-290-001-0 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-290-002-8 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-290-003-6 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-290-004-4 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-290-005-1 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-290-006-9 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-290-007-7 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-290-008-5 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-290-009-3 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-290-010-1 Residential Developed $1,240.98 3 of 10March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 511 Assessor's Type of Status of Taxable Special Parcel Number Property Development Acres Tax County of Contra Costa Community Facilities District No. 2001-1 (Norris Canyon) Special Tax Levy for Fiscal Year 2015-16 211-290-011-9 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-290-012-7 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-290-013-5 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-290-014-3 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-290-015-0 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-290-016-8 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-290-017-6 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-290-018-4 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-290-019-2 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-290-020-0 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-300-001-8 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-300-002-6 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-300-003-4 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-300-004-2 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-300-005-9 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-300-006-7 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-300-007-5 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-300-008-3 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-300-009-1 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-300-010-9 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-300-011-7 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-300-012-5 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-300-013-3 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-300-014-1 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-300-015-8 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-300-016-6 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-300-017-4 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-300-018-2 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-300-019-0 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-300-020-8 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-300-021-6 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-300-022-4 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-300-023-2 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-300-024-0 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-300-025-7 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-300-026-5 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-300-027-3 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-310-001-6 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-310-002-4 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-310-003-2 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-310-004-0 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-310-005-7 Residential Developed $1,240.98 4 of 10March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 512 Assessor's Type of Status of Taxable Special Parcel Number Property Development Acres Tax County of Contra Costa Community Facilities District No. 2001-1 (Norris Canyon) Special Tax Levy for Fiscal Year 2015-16 211-310-006-5 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-310-007-3 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-310-008-1 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-310-009-9 Prepaid Prepaid $0.00 /1 211-310-010-7 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-310-011-5 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-310-012-3 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-310-013-1 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-310-014-9 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-310-015-6 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-310-016-4 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-310-017-2 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-310-018-0 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-310-019-8 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-310-020-6 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-310-021-4 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-310-024-8 HOA HOA $0.00 211-320-001-4 Prepaid Prepaid $0.00 /1 211-320-002-2 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-320-003-0 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-320-004-8 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-320-005-5 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-320-006-3 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-320-007-1 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-320-008-9 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-320-009-7 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-320-010-5 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-320-011-3 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-320-012-1 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-320-013-9 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-320-014-7 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-320-015-4 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-320-016-2 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-320-017-0 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-320-018-8 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-320-019-6 HOA HOA $0.00 211-330-001-2 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-330-002-0 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-330-003-8 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-330-004-6 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-330-005-3 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-330-006-1 Residential Developed $1,240.98 5 of 10March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 513 Assessor's Type of Status of Taxable Special Parcel Number Property Development Acres Tax County of Contra Costa Community Facilities District No. 2001-1 (Norris Canyon) Special Tax Levy for Fiscal Year 2015-16 211-330-007-9 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-330-008-7 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-330-009-5 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-330-012-9 HOA HOA $0.00 211-340-001-0 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-340-002-8 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-340-003-6 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-340-004-4 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-340-005-1 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-340-006-9 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-340-007-7 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-340-011-9 Undeveloped Public $0.00 211-340-012-7 Undeveloped Public $0.00 211-350-001-7 Undeveloped Undeveloped $0.00 211-350-002-5 Undeveloped Undeveloped $0.00 211-350-003-3 Undeveloped Undeveloped $0.00 211-350-004-1 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-350-005-8 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-350-006-6 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-350-007-4 Undeveloped Undeveloped $0.00 211-350-008-2 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-350-009-0 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-350-010-8 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-350-011-6 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-350-012-4 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-350-013-2 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-350-014-0 Undeveloped Undeveloped $0.00 211-350-015-7 Undeveloped Undeveloped $0.00 211-350-016-5 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-350-017-3 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-360-001-5 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-360-002-3 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-360-003-1 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-360-004-9 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-360-005-6 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-360-006-4 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-360-007-2 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-360-008-0 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-360-009-8 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-360-010-6 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-360-011-4 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-360-012-2 Residential Developed $1,240.98 6 of 10March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 514 Assessor's Type of Status of Taxable Special Parcel Number Property Development Acres Tax County of Contra Costa Community Facilities District No. 2001-1 (Norris Canyon) Special Tax Levy for Fiscal Year 2015-16 211-360-013-0 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-360-014-8 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-360-015-5 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-360-016-3 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-360-017-1 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-360-018-9 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-360-019-7 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-360-020-5 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-360-021-3 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-360-022-1 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-360-023-9 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-360-024-7 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-360-025-4 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-360-026-2 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-360-027-0 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-360-028-8 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-360-029-6 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-360-030-4 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-360-031-2 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-360-032-0 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-360-033-8 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-360-034-6 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-360-035-3 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-360-036-1 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-360-037-9 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-360-038-7 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-360-039-5 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-360-040-3 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-360-041-1 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-360-042-9 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-360-043-7 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-360-051-0 HOA HOA $0.00 211-360-052-8 HOA HOA $0.00 211-370-001-3 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-370-002-1 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-370-003-9 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-370-004-7 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-370-005-4 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-370-006-2 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-370-007-0 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-370-008-8 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-370-009-6 Residential Developed $1,240.98 7 of 10March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 515 Assessor's Type of Status of Taxable Special Parcel Number Property Development Acres Tax County of Contra Costa Community Facilities District No. 2001-1 (Norris Canyon) Special Tax Levy for Fiscal Year 2015-16 211-370-010-4 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-370-011-2 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-370-012-0 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-370-013-8 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-370-014-6 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-370-015-3 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-370-016-1 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-370-017-9 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-370-018-7 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-370-019-5 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-370-020-3 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-370-021-1 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-370-022-9 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-370-023-7 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-370-024-5 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-370-025-2 Prepaid Prepaid $0.00 /1 211-370-026-0 Prepaid Prepaid $0.00 /1 211-370-027-8 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-370-028-6 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-370-029-4 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-370-030-2 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-370-031-0 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-370-032-8 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-370-033-6 Prepaid Prepaid $0.00 /1 211-370-034-4 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-370-035-1 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-370-036-9 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-370-037-7 Prepaid Prepaid $0.00 /1 211-370-038-5 Prepaid Prepaid $0.00 /1 211-370-039-3 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-370-040-1 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-370-041-9 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-370-042-7 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-370-043-5 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-370-044-3 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-370-045-0 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-370-046-8 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-370-047-6 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-370-048-4 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-370-049-2 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-370-050-0 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-370-051-8 Residential Developed $1,240.98 8 of 10March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 516 Assessor's Type of Status of Taxable Special Parcel Number Property Development Acres Tax County of Contra Costa Community Facilities District No. 2001-1 (Norris Canyon) Special Tax Levy for Fiscal Year 2015-16 211-370-052-6 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-370-053-4 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-370-054-2 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-370-055-9 Prepaid Prepaid $0.00 /1 211-370-056-7 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-370-057-5 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-370-058-3 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-370-062-5 HOA HOA $0.00 211-370-063-3 HOA HOA $0.00 211-370-069-0 HOA HOA $0.00 211-380-001-1 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-380-002-9 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-380-003-7 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-380-004-5 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-380-005-2 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-380-006-0 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-380-007-8 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-380-008-6 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-380-009-4 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-380-010-2 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-380-011-0 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-380-012-8 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-380-013-6 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-380-014-4 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-380-015-1 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-380-016-9 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-380-017-7 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-380-018-5 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-380-019-3 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-380-020-1 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-380-021-9 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-380-022-7 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-380-023-5 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-380-024-3 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-380-025-0 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-380-026-8 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-380-027-6 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-380-028-4 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-380-029-2 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-380-030-0 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-380-031-8 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-380-032-6 Residential Developed $1,240.98 9 of 10March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 517 Assessor's Type of Status of Taxable Special Parcel Number Property Development Acres Tax County of Contra Costa Community Facilities District No. 2001-1 (Norris Canyon) Special Tax Levy for Fiscal Year 2015-16 211-380-033-4 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-380-034-2 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-380-035-9 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-380-036-7 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-380-037-5 Prepaid Prepaid $0.00 /1 211-380-038-3 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-380-039-1 Residential Developed $1,240.98 211-380-049-0 Undeveloped Public $0.00 211-410-001-5 HOA HOA $0.00 Total Special Tax Levy $423,174.18 /1 This parcel has prepaid its special tax obligation and is no longer subject to the special tax. Goodwin Consulting Group, Inc. 10 of 10March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 518 APPENDIX C Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Tax March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 519 County of Contra Costa CFD No. 2001-1 1 April 13, 2001 COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2001-1 (NORRIS CANYON) RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAX A Special Tax applicable to each Assessor's Parcel in Community Facilities District No. 2001-1 (herein ACFD No. 2001-1@) shall be levied and collected according to the tax liability determined by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa or its designee, as described below. All of the property in CFD No. 2001-1, unless exempted by law or by the provisions of Section G below, shall be taxed for the purposes, to the extent, and in the manner herein provided. A. DEFINITIONS The terms hereinafter set forth have the following meanings: AAcre or Acreage@ means the land area of an Assessor=s Parcel as shown on an Assessor's Parcel Map, or if the land area is not shown on an Assessor's Parcel Map, the land area shown on the applicable final map, parcel map, or other recorded County parcel map. AAct@ means the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended, being Chapter 2.5, (commencing with Section 53311), Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California. AAdministrative Expenses@ means any or all of the following: the fees and expenses of any fiscal agent or trustee (including any fees and expenses of its counsel) employed in connection with any Bonds; any costs associated with the marketing or remarketing of the Bonds; the expenses of the Administrator and the County in carrying out their respective duties under any fiscal agent agreement, indenture or resolution with respect to the Bonds or CFD No. 2001-1, including, but not limited to, the levy and collection of the Special Tax, the fees and expenses of legal counsel, charges levied by the County or any division or office thereof in connection with the levy and collection of Special Taxes, audits, continuing disclosure or other amounts needed to pay arbitrage rebate to the federal government with respect to Bonds; costs associated with complying with continuing disclosure requirements; costs associated with responding to public inquiries regarding Special Tax levies and appeals; attorneys= fees and other costs associated with commencement or pursuit of foreclosure for delinquent Special Taxes; costs associated with overhead expense allocations to CFD No. 2001-1; and all other costs and expenses of the County, the Administrator, and any fiscal agent, escrow agent or trustee related to the administration of CFD No. 2001-1. AAdministrator@ shall mean the person or firm designated by the Board to administer the Special Tax according to this Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Tax. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 520 County of Contra Costa CFD No. 2001-1 2 April 13, 2001 “Annual Interest Component@ means the total amount of interest on Bonds in the calendar year commencing in such Fiscal Year. AAssessor's Parcel@ or AParcel@ means a lot or parcel shown in an Assessor's Parcel Map with an assigned Assessor's Parcel number. AAssessor's Parcel Map@ means an official map of the County Assessor of the County of Contra Costa designating parcels by Assessor's Parcel Number. ABonds@ means any bonds or other debt (as defined in Section 53317(d) of the Act), whether in one or more series, issued by CFD No. 2001-1 under the Act. ABoard@ means the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa. ACapitalized Interest@ means funds in any capitalized interest account available to pay debt service on Bonds issued by CFD No. 2001-1. ACapitalized Interest Requirement@ means the least of: i) the Annual Interest Component, ii) the difference between the Special Tax Requirement and the amount determined pursuant to Step 1 of Section E hereof, or iii) the amount of Capitalized Interest available. ACounty@ means the County of Contra Costa. ADeveloped Property@ means Taxable Property for which a building permit for construction was issued prior to June 1 of the preceding Fiscal Year. AFiscal Year@ means the period starting July 1 and ending on the following June 30. AHomeowners= Association Property@ means any property within the boundaries of CFD No. 2001- 1 which is owned by a homeowners= or property owners= association. ALand Use Class@ means one of the defined land use categories for which a specific Maximum Special Tax is identified in Table 1 in Section C below. AMaximum Special Tax@ means the maximum amount of Special Tax, determined in accordance with Section C below, that can be levied in any Fiscal Year. AOther Property@ means Developed Property which is not Residential Property, Public Property, or Homeowners= Association Property. APlanned Units@ means the number of individual residential units that were expected to be constructed on property within CFD No. 2001-1 as shown in Attachment 1. AProportionately@ means, for Residential Property and Other Property, that the ratio of the actual Special Tax levied in any Fiscal Year to the Maximum Special Tax authorized to be levied in that March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 521 County of Contra Costa CFD No. 2001-1 3 April 13, 2001 Fiscal Year is equal for all Assessor=s Parcels of Residential Property and Other Property. For Undeveloped Property, "Proportionately" means that the ratio of the actual Special Tax to the Maximum Special Tax is equal for all Assessor=s Parcels of Undeveloped Property. For Homeowners= Association Property and nonexempt Public Property, "Proportionately" means that the ratio of the actual Special Tax to the Maximum Special Tax is equal for all Assessor=s Parcels of Homeowners= Association Property and Public Property. APublic Property@ means any property within the boundaries of CFD No. 2001-1 that is owned by or irrevocably offered for dedication to the federal government, State of California or other local governments or public agencies. AResidential Property@ means, in any Fiscal Year, any Parcel of Developed Property for the construction of a residential structure which is not Homeowners= Association Property or Public Property. ASpecial Tax@ means a special tax levied in any Fiscal Year that will be used to pay the Special Tax Requirement, as defined below. ASpecial Tax Requirement@ means the total amount needed each Fiscal Year to (i) pay principal and interest on Bonds in the calender year commencing in such Fiscal Year, (ii) create or replenish reserve funds, (iii) cure any delinquencies in the payment of principal or interest on indebtedness of CFD No. 2001-1 which have occurred in the prior Fiscal Year or (based on delinquencies in the payment of Special Taxes which have already taken place) are expected to occur in the Fiscal Year in which the tax will be collected, (iv) pay Administrative Expenses. ATaxable Property@ means all of the Assessor's Parcels within the boundary of CFD No. 2001-1 which are not exempt from the Special Tax pursuant to law or Section G below. ATentative Map@ means the tentative map for Norris Canyon Estates approved by the Board in August 1997. AUndeveloped Property@ means any Parcel of Taxable Property within CFD No. 2001-1 for which a building permit has not been issued prior to June 1 of the preceding Fiscal Year. B. ASSIGNMENT TO LAND USE CLASS Each Fiscal Year, the Administrator shall categorize each parcel of property in CFD No. 2001-1 as Developed Property or Undeveloped Property, and Parcels of Developed Property shall be further identified as either Residential Property, Other Property, Homeowners= Association Property or Public Property. For each Parcel of Other Property within the CFD, the Administrator shall determine how many Planned Units had been expected on the Parcel in order to assign the Maximum Special Tax pursuant to Section C below. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 522 County of Contra Costa CFD No. 2001-1 4 April 13, 2001 C. MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX Pursuant to Section 53321 (d) of the Act, a Maximum Special Tax must be established as a specific dollar amount before a Parcel is first subject to the tax when in private residential use. The following maximum rates shall apply to all Parcels of Taxable Property within CFD No. 2001-1 for each Fiscal Year in which the Special Tax is collected: TABLE 1 MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX (Fiscal Year 2001-02) Land Use Class Description Maximum Special Tax (Fiscal Year 2001-02) 1 Residential Property $2,100 per Parcel 2 Other Property $2,100 per Planned Unit of the Parcel before it became Other Property 3 Undeveloped Property $3,360 per Acre Pursuant to Section 53321 (d) of the Act, the Special Tax levied against a Parcel used for private residential purposes shall under no circumstances increase more than ten percent (10%) as a consequence of delinquency or default by the owner of any other Parcel or Parcels and shall, in no event, exceed the Maximum Special Tax in effect for the Fiscal Year in which the Special Tax is being levied. D. MANDATORY PREPAYMENT OF SPECIAL TAX RESULTING FROM TENTATIVE MAP REVISIONS It is possible that a revision in the Tentative Map could result in less Special Tax revenue being available from the CFD. To preclude this result, after CFD No. 2001-1 has been formed, the County shall apply the following steps for every proposed Tentative Map revision: Step 1: The County or its designee shall calculate the Maximum Special Tax revenues that could be collected from the property affected by the proposed Tentative Map revision (the AAffected Property@) prior to the revision being approved; March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 523 County of Contra Costa CFD No. 2001-1 5 April 13, 2001 Step 2: The County or its designee shall calculate the Maximum Special Tax revenues that could be collected from the Affected Property if the Tentative Map revision is approved; Step 3: If the amount determined in Step 2 is higher than that calculated in Step 1, the Tentative Map revision may be approved without prepayment of the Special Tax. If the revenues calculated in Step 2 are less than those calculated in Step 1, the County may not approve the Tentative Map revision unless the landowner requesting the Tentative Map revision prepays a portion of the Special Tax obligation that would have applied to the Affected Property prior to approval of the revision in an amount sufficient to retire a portion of the Bonds and maintain 110% coverage on the Bonds= debt service with the reduced Maximum Special Tax revenues that will result after the Tentative Map revision is approved. The required prepayment shall be calculated using the formula set forth in Section H below. Property owners wishing to prepay the Special Tax as a result of a Tentative Map revision cannot be delinquent on past Special Taxes on the Affected Property. E. METHOD OF LEVY AND COLLECTION OF THE SPECIAL TAX Commencing with Fiscal Year 2001-02 and for each following Fiscal Year, the Administrator shall determine the Special Tax Requirement for that Fiscal Year. The Special Tax shall then be levied as follows: Step 1: The Special Tax shall be levied Proportionately on each Parcel of Residential Property and Other Property up to 100% of the Maximum Special Tax up to the Special Tax Requirement for each Land Use Class for such Fiscal Year as determined pursuant to Section C. The Maximum Special Tax for a Parcel of Other Property shall be the total Maximum Special Taxes for the Planned Units that the Other Property replaced, as determined by the Administrator; Step 2: Determine the Capitalized Interest Requirement, if any, and add it to the amount levied under Step 1; Step 3: If the total of the Capitalized Interest Requirement and the amount levied under Step 1 is less than the Special Tax Requirement, the Special Tax shall be levied Proportionately on each Assessor's Parcel of Undeveloped Property within the CFD, up to 100% of the Maximum Special Tax for Undeveloped Property for such Fiscal Year determined pursuant to Section C; Step 4: If additional monies are needed after applying the first three steps, the Special Tax shall be levied Proportionately on each Parcel of Homeowners= Association Property and Public Property which originally had Planned Units, up to 100% of the Maximum Special Tax for Undeveloped Property for such Fiscal Year determined pursuant to Section C. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 524 County of Contra Costa CFD No. 2001-1 6 April 13, 2001 F. MANNER OF COLLECTION The Special Taxes for CFD No. 2001-1 shall be collected in the same manner and at the same time as ordinary ad valorem property taxes, provided, however, that prepayments are permitted as set forth in Section H below (and may be required in the case of Tentative Map revisions) and provided further that the County may directly bill the Special Tax, may collect Special Taxes at a different time or in a different manner, and may collect delinquent Special Taxes through foreclosure or other available methods. The Special Tax shall be levied and collected until principal and interest on Bonds have been repaid and authorized facilities to be constructed directly from Special Taxes proceeds have been completed. However, in no event shall a Special Taxes be levied after Fiscal Year 2039-2040. G. EXEMPTIONS Notwithstanding any other provision of this Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Tax, no Special Taxes shall be levied on Public Property, except as otherwise provided in Sections 53317.3 and 53317.5 of the Act. H. PREPAYMENT OF SPECIAL TAX The following definitions apply to this Section H: "Future Facilities Costs" means the Public Facilities Requirements (as defined below) minus public facility costs funded by Previously Issued Bonds, interest earnings on the construction fund actually earned prior to the date of prepayment, Special Taxes, developer equity, and/or any other source of funding. "Outstanding Bonds" means all Previously Issued Bonds which remain outstanding, with the following exception: if a Special Tax has been levied against, or already paid by, an Assessor=s Parcel making a prepayment, and a portion of the Special Tax will be used to pay a portion of the next principal payment on the Bonds that remain outstanding (as determined by the Administrator), that next principal payment shall be subtracted from the total Bond principal that remains outstanding, and the difference shall be used as the amount of AOutstanding Bonds@ for purposes of this prepayment formula. "Previously Issued Bonds" means all Bonds that have been issued by CFD No. 2001-1 prior to the date of prepayment. "Public Facilities Requirements" means either $5,900,000 in 2001 dollars, which shall increase by three percent (3%) on January 1, 2002, and on each January 1 thereafter, or such lower number as shall be determined by the County as sufficient to fund public facilities to be provided by CFD No. 2001-1 under the authorized bonding program for CFD No. 2001-1. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 525 County of Contra Costa CFD No. 2001-1 7 April 13, 2001 The Special Tax obligation applicable to an Assessor's Parcel in CFD No. 2001-1 may be prepaid and the obligation of the Assessor's Parcel to pay the Special Tax permanently satisfied as described herein, provided that a prepayment may be made only if there are no delinquent Special Taxes with respect to such Assessor's Parcel at the time of prepayment. An owner of an Assessor's Parcel intending to prepay the Special Tax obligation shall provide the County with written notice of intent to prepay. Within 30 days of receipt of such written notice, the County shall notify such owner of the prepayment amount of such Assessor's Parcel. Prepayment must be made not less than 75 days prior to any interest payment date for Bonds to be redeemed with the proceeds of such prepaid Special Taxes. The Prepayment Amount shall be calculated as follows (capitalized terms as defined below): Bond Redemption Amount plus Future Facilities Amount plus Redemption Premium plus Defeasance plus Administrative Fees and Expenses less Reserve Fund Credit equals Prepayment Amount As of the proposed date of prepayment, the Prepayment Amount shall be determined by application of the following steps: Step 1: Compute the total Maximum Special Tax that could be collected from the Assessor's Parcel prepaying the Special Tax in the Fiscal Year in which prepayment would be received by the County. Step 2: Divide the Maximum Special Tax computed pursuant to Step 1 for such Assessor=s Parcel by the lesser of (i) the Maximum Special Tax revenues that could be collected in that Fiscal Year from property in the entire CFD, or (ii) the Maximum Special Tax revenues that could be generated at buildout of property in the CFD based on anticipated land uses at the time the prepayment is calculated. Step 3: Multiply the quotient computed pursuant to Step 2 by the Outstanding Bonds to compute the amount of Outstanding Bonds to be retired and prepaid. (the ABond Redemption Amount@). Step 4: Compute the current Future Facilities Costs. Step 5: Multiply the quotient computed pursuant to Step 2 by the amount determined pursuant to Step 4 to compute the amount of Future Facilities Costs to be prepaid (the AFuture Facilities Amount@). March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 526 County of Contra Costa CFD No. 2001-1 8 April 13, 2001 Step 6: Multiply the Bond Redemption Amount computed pursuant to Step 3 by the applicable redemption premium, if any, on the Outstanding Bonds to be redeemed (the ARedemption Premium@). Step 7: Compute the amount needed to pay interest on the Bond Redemption Amount starting with the first Bond interest payment date after which the prepayment has been received until the earliest redemption date for the Outstanding Bonds. However, if Bonds are callable at the first interest payment date after the prepayment has been received, Steps 7, 8 and 9 of this prepayment formula will not apply. Step 8: Compute the amount of interest the County reasonably expects to derive from reinvestment of the Bond Redemption Amount plus the Redemption Premium from the first Bond interest payment date after which the prepayment has been received until the redemption date for the Outstanding Bonds. Step 9: Take the amount computed pursuant to Step 7 and subtract the amount computed pursuant to Step 8 (the ADefeasance@). Step 10: The administrative fees and expenses of CFD No. 2001-1 are as calculated by the County and include the costs of computation of the prepayment, the costs of redeeming Bonds, and the costs of recording any notices to evidence the prepayment and the redemption (the AAdministrative Fees and Expenses@). Step 11: A reserve fund credit shall be calculated as the reduction, if any, in the applicable reserve fund for the Outstanding Bonds to be redeemed pursuant to the prepayment (the AReserve Fund Credit@). Step 12: The Special Tax prepayment is equal to the sum of the amounts computed pursuant to Steps 3, 5, 6, 9, and 10, less the amount computed pursuant to Step 11 (the APrepayment Amount@). March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 527 Attachment 1 Tentative Map for Norris Canyon Estates March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 528 APPENDIX D Boundary Map of Community Facilities District No. 2001-1 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 529 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 530 APPENDIX E Assessor’s Parcel Maps for Fiscal Year 2015-16 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 531 ASSESSOR’S MAP CONTRA COSTA COUNTY,CALIF. BOOK PAGE211 21 X-15 PURPOSES ONLY. NO LIABILITY IS ASSUMED FOR THE ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION NOTE: THIS MAP WAS PREPARED FOR ASSESSMENT DELINEATED HEREON. ASSESSOR’S PARCELS MAY NOT COMPLY WITH LOCAL LOT SPLIT OR BUILDING SITE ORDINANCES. 1 2 2 1 1 "A" "C" STA. #70-1 STA. #70-A STA. #70 W. LANE 10’ EASE. CTR. NORRIS CANYON RD. STA.#69 NO R R I S CANY O N 2 "A" "D" 117.01Ac. 1.818Ac. LOT 2 LOT 1 210 22 210 17 16 2120 18 17 2019 W. LN FREITAS 4848 O.R. 141 PCL.2 COUNTYLINE387.06 R=967 155. 4 3 R=333 N78^2 5 ’ W327.381262. 7 5 1290.73N52^5 2 ’ 1 5 " E N02^0’WR=1033 274.17 65.6 R=633 119.43 N53^25’37"E 2328.48 N89^27’34"W N89^27’34"W 860.12 2188.56N50^23’7"E 442.10 129.49 R=133 1272.931668.02398.10309.34N19^18’WN2 9 ^ 3 9 ’ 5 0 "W 2 4 7 7 . 1 6 .23Ac.200.0 50.0S5^39’15"WS86^08’52"E S3^51’08"WS4 4 ^ 3 5 ’ 4 5 " E 24 1 5 . 9 7 38 7 . 1 32604.71N02^42’27"EN70 ^ 2 ’ 1 9 " W 156 0 . 0 5828.9N10^9’32"E77.34 768.3635.75N81^22’40"E 1024.90 N31^21’46"EN5^01’43"WN63 ^ 0 7 ’ 5 4 "WN11^53’58"WR=1 6 3 217.6 25 1 . 7 8 128 . 1 3 191.51115.32 90.86 N89^29’W (TIE)N0^31’EN81^22’40"E 2626.09 219. 9 6 515.12 N.D.S74^52’W S25^0’59"W139.46R=273 294.64 N.D. N.B. 1 9 4 . 6 4 52 6 . 1 7 16 5372.03211.6N6 3 ^ 5 0 ’ 3 9 "W 555 .6 9 09 17 29 14 75 54 55 58 57 78 80 1"=800’ TI E 4 2 1 4 . 3 6 t o T P O B A S H B O U R N E D R STARCROSS D R LYNDHURST PLWENTWOOD DR24 25 26 "E" 82 45 84 "C-2""D" COMMON AREA COMMON AREA COMMON AREA COMMON AREA N0^31’E 1694.524 8 9 .7 2 235.71 366.25 42 5 . 9 4 332.2423 4 . 4 119 0 .8 9 216.3 0 R = 1 5 2 4 82 4 . 4 61317.56A A A A A A A A A A 24 "F-3" 1109.66S89^4’30"E S 2 6 ^ 4 2 ’ 5 2 "W N89^4’30"W 1429.13 04 209 A L A M E D A C O U N T Y C O N T R A C O S T A C O U N T Y 23 35 07 209 65 59 S 2 6 ^ 3 5 ’ 3 1 " E 9 9 9 . 9 6 414.37659.66450 N80^29’3 9 " W 496.01 158.70 408.27151.76128.70N.D.63 81 "D" "B-1" "A""U" 64 28.28AC 28 29 136 245.15130.1320 2 . 4 0 124.463 3 7 . 8 9 206.35 190.56 231.18 2 9 6 . 5 3264.28 174.24165.95217408.45 2217.65 733.45 220.3 3173. 80 15 0 . 8 4170.89R= 7 2 6 519.80 B B B B B B BB B B COMMON AREA 3 4 8 0 . 2 0 349.08 S63^1 5 ’ 5 2 " W 5 4 3 . 9 2N2 9 ^ 9 ’ 2 5 "W624.93N59^57’40"W 1125.71 S81^33’3"W 2 2 7 . 3 2 N 4 1 ^ 5 ’ 1 3 " W 279.18N7^10’27"W322.68165.7586.26 86.62 87.11 86.27 85.16 FROM PAGE 23 68 32.18Ac. 67 61.19Ac. 31 32 33 34 "L" TRACT 7998 74 C C C C PCL "L" TR 7998 C 2 4 2 . 6 0R=1 4 8 7 218.15406.202- 36 37 38 83 "S" TRACT 7996 23 EBMUD SEE PG. 38 FOR PCL. NO. D D D D POR TRACT 7578 POR TRACT 7575 POR SEC 17,18,19,20&21 T2S R1W MDBM TR 7996 MB 473-46 TR 7996 1/31/05 EB REG PARK DIST 74.77Ac MB 438-38 219.38 257.83N24^3’54"E12/5/75 5/5/88 41PM21 133PM8 1- MB 438-38 (NORRIS CANYON ESTATES PHASE IV) 1/28/02 6.51Ac.FM 209-5 1/17/02 POR "D" 77.80Ac 67.052Ac 23 30 MB 432-30 75.54Ac 8-06-01 1.112Ac MB 415-4 9-13-99 91.48Ac POR "B" 30.96Ac 36.02Ac 38.363Ac 1.01Ac TRACT 8566 1-28-09 MB 508-45 138.85Ac 93.42Ac 12.45Ac 20.08Ac POR "B" RD 7.64Ac 19.13Ac 1-28-02 S2^49’38"W65.08 132.94 11.65 301.16S73^19’40"W A- B- C- D-MB 473-46 (NORRIS CANYON ESTATES PHASE III) 1/31/05PCL "S" TR 7996 40 5.886Ac MB 415-4 (NORRIS CANYON ESTATES) 9/13/99 MB 432-30 (NORRIS CANYON ESTATES) 8/6/01 S85^34’09"W 8/15/12 392.67 N69 ^ 6 ’ 3 2 " W 347. 2 3 673.45 "H"N22^39’11"W185 .84 "G" TR 7575 "C "27 256.74 R=770 D "L" "K" B B B 46.8Ac TR 7578 "F-1" "F-2" "F-4" 4.94Ac 81-84 41 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 532 ASSESSOR’S MAP CONTRA COSTA COUNTY,CALIF. BOOK PAGE211 23 PURPOSES ONLY. NO LIABILITY IS ASSUMED FOR THE ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION NOTE: THIS MAP WAS PREPARED FOR ASSESSMENT DELINEATED HEREON. ASSESSOR’S PARCELS MAY NOT COMPLY WITH LOCAL LOT SPLIT OR BUILDING SITE ORDINANCES. 24 1 9 . 8 6 S4 4 ^ 3 5 ’ 4 5 " W 917.3 S87^5’45"E 1339.61 S4 6 ^ 1 7 ’ 5 0 " E 21 21 230 01 15 04 14 20 21 2829 506.25 (CODE LINE) 230 37-8 1- A L A M E D A C O U N T Y 04 C O N T R A C O S T A C O U N T Y 07 01 02 03 1"=800’ TO PG 21 1125.71 624.93N59^57’40"W 5 4 3 . 9 2 349.08 X-15,16 N81^45’00"E 2 7 0 5 . 9 8 N01^34’46"E2158.9013 54.33Ac 17 4 5 CRANLEIGH C TASHBOURNE CIRN63^1 5 ’ 5 2 " E N10^12’25"W320.0N53^32 ’ 0 4 " E 610.4 7 N86^08’01"W 877.29 N 2 4 ^ 4 2 ’ 4 9 "W 5 0 3 3 . 3 4 N88^03’38"W 2471.95 416.54N79^46’0 8 " W 318.15 29 0 . 2 6 49 7 . 7 9 N82^07’42"E 1 8 7 6 . 0 6N02^42’27"E 2604.71N81^22’40"E 1 5 5 3 . 0 4 N01^36’27"E 1980.5955 5 . 6 9 N6 3 ^ 5 0 ’ 3 9 "W N88^22’45"W 408.27 229.67 268.01N43^35’ 0 8 " E 19 4 . 6 4 372.03N04^41’18"E139.46N34^03’27"W 83.97 223.90N18^25’40"EN06^12’21"E382.32N50^54’39 "W 4 6 8 . 5 7 236.73183. 4 8 N48^22’59"W 106.58 N33^42’20"W 143.17 N50^15’40"W 179.06 111.69N 6 1 ^ 2 4 ’ 1 9 "W 29 0 . 5 1 N38^11’29"W 83.47 N76^55’47"W 54.81 2 6 5 . 4 1 291.88376.42 161.29 270. 8 8 135.87 286.77 N58^23’17"E 97.40 N51^23 ’ 4 8 " E 293.97209.94125.69155.782 4 6 . 0 8 1 1 8 . 9 5 2 4 2 . 6 0 N 3 9 ^ 3 0 ’ 5 8 " W R=83 128.02 N76^31’05"W 90.27 R=1487 218.15 N55^41’40"W 22.87 21 1 . 0 1 22 6 . 4 7 219. 9 7 N62^40’21"E 151.26 N85^13’51"E 111.98 177.70 229.80 R=224 40.20 A A A A A A A A 17 SEE PAGE 37 SEE PAGE 35N31^21’46"E768.3N10^9’32"E828.9N70 ^ 2 ’ 1 9 " W 156 0 . 0 5 S74^52’W 515.12 S25^0’59"WN.D.16 68.16Ac FM 209-6 1/17/02 9/23/09N2 9 ^ 0 9 ’ 2 5 "W N 4 1 ^ 1 0 ’ 0 8 " W N81^33’3"E LOT 1 A A BDY OF RANCHO SAN RAMONN01^41’32"EN68^08’06 "W 2244 .35 N 4 6 ^ 1 7 ’ 5 0 " W POR SECS 20,21,28&29 T2S R1W MDBM 41PM21 12/5/1975 MB 508-45 (WIEDEMANN RANCH ESTATES) 1/28/2009A-2010 ROLL-LTS 1,2&3 TR 8566 LOT 2 362.33Ac 469.55 N01^19’22"W419.25 POR LOT 3 POR LOT 3ND 21.90Ac A A 134.25Ac 82.72Ac POR LOT 3 N03^06’13"E 130.98 N05^39’21"E 79.10 N01^0’29"W 96.45 N13^43’36"E 181.10 N28^04’56"W 134.35 N39^39’31"E 93.14 N16^29’52"W 128.71 N24^47’26"W 113.50 N75^35’08"W 115.62 N66^06’13"W 185.19 241.62 199.6135.0Ac WITT E N H A M C T 186.61 AN21^25’01"E406.20494.72 N80^26’14 " W A A A A A POR LOT 3 FROM PG 21 A March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 533 PURPOSES ONLY. NO LIABILITY IS ASSUMED FOR THE ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION NOTE: THIS MAP WAS PREPARED FOR ASSESSMENT DELINEATED HEREON. ASSESSOR’S PARCELS MAY NOT COMPLY WITH LOCAL LOT SPLIT OR BUILDING SITE ORDINANCES. ASSESSOR’S MAP CONTRA COSTA COUNTY,CALIF. BOOK PAGE211 24 1"=100’ 25 240 240 2000 ROLL-X-15 ASHBOURNE DR 30 31 36 35 34 33 32 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 "S" "C-3" "U" "J" "B" "R" "T" "C-2" "I" L Y N D H U R S T P L 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 19 1718 03 04 05 06 07 01 02 22 21 POR.TRACT 7578 M.B. 415-4 (NORRIS CANYON ESTATES) .55AC .04AC .06AC 1.15AC 21 31.3 4 76. 3 8 47.3 3R=464 15 9 . 2 0 R=9 7 6 R = 4 1 0 1 5 0 . 9 9 151 . 2 1 118.09 60125.1446.45N4^2’8"E62.2430.75 N81^ 22’40"E R= 1 0 2 4 33 3 . 2 4 N 5 9 ^ 0 ’ 2 7 "W 109.39 50 11 7 . 1 7 160 1 1 7 . 0 7 163.5 5 157 150 170.84 170.54 164.83 85. 62 85. 29 88.331 1 5 . 8 8 1 1 7 . 3 3 N61^5’43"WN35^40’3"EN30^27 ’56 ’W 17 0 . 89 133.46 153.02 3 3 . 7 4 9 7 . 2 3 N 4 5 ^ 1 3 ’ 1 3 " W 62.754 8 . 8 2 169.2 6 167.9 8 96.0396.09 9 5 . 9 8 1 2 8 . 7 0 1 3 1 1 3 1 N33^44’1 1 " E 1 5 9 . 3 9 N43^36 ’ 4 5 " E N53^2 4 ’ 6 " E N48^3 3 ’ 2 ’ E N38^40’28 " E N57^1’ 1 1 " E 100 97.13N71^9’1’E N69^12’30" E 7 2 . 6 6 9278.89R=1572 0 8 . 7 9 N 5 3 ^ 4 7 ’ 4 0 " W N 4 7 ^ 7 ’ 5 " W 2 3 4 . 4 1 N 4 2 ^ 2 9 ’ 2 "WN21^8’54"WN31 ^2 2 ’18 "W 170 .9 1 N56^11 ’ 2 0 " E N62^16’ 1 7 " E N64^15’4 3 " E N60^38 ’ 3 1 " EN24^19’52"W 190 .8988.1146.1931.78 179 166.97 107.1083.79 N49^5 1 ’ 1 9 " E N49^5 1 ’ 1 9 " E N49^5 1 ’ 1 9 " E N 4 0 ^ 8 ’ 4 1 " W 3 1 6 . 7 0 1 0 5 . 0 1 8 8 . 7 0 R=25R=2519.888 8 . 0 1 8 8 . 6 9 1 0 5 166.4 8 R=830217.50R=15208 1 5 . 3 5 26 . 2 5 R = 4 5 212.9 6 34.87 R=15748 2 4 . 4 6 R = 4 6 4 108.0752.78N29^6’41"E51 . 3 2 R = 4 1 0 R=1231 6 3 . 5 7 4.31 N49^5 1 ’ 1 9 " E N49^5 1 ’ 1 9 " E N 4 6 ^ 3 8 ’ 4 8 " W 19.88292.94 281.0 9 8 0 . 5 2 4.31 89.7473. 9 1 73. 9 1 12. 6 1 7.6 8 56.0 5 56.0 5 1 0 6 . 6 0 94.8728.3128.3133.3839.03N7 2 ^ 8 ’ 5 0 "W R= 5 3 R= 8 7 N80 ^ 2 6 ’ 5 9 " W R= 3 0 9 R= 2 7 5 N60^41’WR=2 0 1 R=235N70^11’59"W 162 .73 1 6 2 . 7 3 R= 2 0 0 1 4 . 0 7 1 4 2 . 1 1 12 1 . 7 2R= 2 3 4 12 8 . 3 4N25^13’3"E 259.36277.09191.51128.13115.52251.78N25^13’3"EN64^57’20"WN24^38’13"EN66^31’43"W33.3251.05N 5 3 ^ 8 ’ 1 3 " W N 5 3 ^ 8 ’ 1 3 " W 48 9 . 7 2 50 2 . 8 6 1 8 4 . 2 7 1 6 5 . 5 7 82 . 6 1 97 . 3 9 9 6 . 0 6 7 3 . 7 1 R = 3 0 1 R = 3 3 5 R = 2 2 4 R = 1 9 0 N 4 1 ^ 5 6 ’ 5 "W N 4 1 ^ 5 6 ’ 5 "W 40.69 54.76N81^22’40"E 673.45 ( P V T . S T . ) ( PVT . ST . ) ( PVT . ST . ) 4.39AC E.B.M.U.D. COMMON AREA 10 4 . 7 5 COMMON AREA N 3 9 ^ 1 9 ’ 2 4 20.5934.023 1 . 7 8 N04^02’55"E POR. PCL. C 133PM8 FM. 209-95 01-17-02 21 21 25 TO PCL 211-210-056 ( P V T . S T . ) SE E A P N # 2 1 1 - 2 5 0 - 0 2 6 S E E A PN # 2 1 1 - 2 5 0 - 0 2 6 SE E A P N # 2 1 1 - 2 5 0 - 0 2 6 S E E A PN # 2 1 1 - 2 5 0 - 0 2 6 S E E A PN # 2 1 1 - 2 5 0 - 0 2 6 8/15/12 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 534 ASSESSOR’S MAP CONTRA COSTA COUNTY,CALIF. BOOK PAGE211 25 PURPOSES ONLY. NO LIABILITY IS ASSUMED FOR THE ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION NOTE: THIS MAP WAS PREPARED FOR ASSESSMENT DELINEATED HEREON. ASSESSOR’S PARCELS MAY NOT COMPLY WITH LOCAL LOT SPLIT OR BUILDING SITE ORDINANCES. 1"=100’ 21 250 250 2000 ROLL- NORRIS C A N Y O N R D STARCROSS D R LYNDHURST PL 1 2 3 4 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 "L" "A" "M" "N" "F-2" "C-1" "I" "O" 20 26 01 24 16 23 17 18 19 15 14 13 12 11 10 09 08 07 06 05 21 04 03 02 25 "F-1" 21 21 21 POR.TRACT 7578 M.B. 415-4 (NORRIS CANYON ESTATES) L Y N D H U R S T P L 24 24 21 1.53 AC "R" "T" ( PVT . ST . ) ( PV T. S T. )( PVT. ST. )( PVT. ST. )79.99 105.18 28.88N15^10’1’WN31^3’28"EN81^41’3"E N80^33’46"E N71^54’ 4 " E N58^2 5 ’ 5 7 " E N53^9’ 4 6 " E 179 7 8 . 9 7 1 7 . 6 8 6 7 . 8 5 1 0 6 . 5 568.2224.01N1^7’18"WN21^40’10 "W N 3 9 ^ 2 4 ’ 1 0 " W 1 6 2 . 4 485.33180.38 172 174.3 8 N56^1 1 ’ 2 0 ’ E65.07 7 3 . 9 6 8 8 . 4 8R=5702 4 2 . 6 2R=6242 6 5 . 6 0 1 7 . 6 8 4.2324.01 R=176 R=224 170.6 2 134.0 6 102 65.47 24.46 41.77 65.51 N 4 2 ^ 5 1 ’ 1 4 " W N52^3 8 ’ 1 " E N88^31’23"E N26^47’29"EN89^3’25"W 150.57N8^53’29"W25 R=828 143.86143.4443.41202.76 R=330R=305121.73N21^21’28"EN86^42’12"E23.2528.5929.8719.69N13^4’59"WN55^49’28"WR=429 135.70 123.1 2 R=376 N80^33’46"E 12 870.71152.41 98R=234 249.73 R=40N32^9’39"ER=6056.76 N79^38’1 6 " W 282.11R=208125.85R=274113.3030.24 6.97 25.9016.27N8^53’29"W257.19 41.20 175.10N8^0’15"EN53^5 8 ’ 1 5 " E R=858 17.85 25.73 R=186 N 3 6 ^ 7 ’ 3 4 " W 216.3 0 170 27.23 185.7 2 N75^1 8 ’ 3 1 " W N88^45’10"W N75^4’19 " E N15^34’16"W 340 .58R=528423.18 N2 4 ^ 4 8 ’ 4 6 "W N82^39’19"E 130.48R=4493 2 0 . 0 481 3784.27381 7 7 . 1 3 260.24 71 16.44 114.73N13^38’25"WN34^58’33"E30N2^19’49"WN44^9’35"EN4 4 ^ 4 3 ’ 5 3 " W221.67117.5 3 N60^1 ’ 4 4 " E 166.48 N49^23’ 4 5 " E N49^51 ’ 1 9 " E N49^51 ’ 1 9 " E N49^51 ’ 1 9 " E 1 0 7 . 9 1 9 0 8 7 N 4 6 ^ 3 8 ’ 4 8 " W 4 3 8 . 4 2 1 3 1 . 2 5 1 2 3 . 9 4 N 4 0 ^ 8 ’ 4 1 " W 3 1 6 . 7 0 292.94N49^51 ’ 1 9 " E 158.5 3 165 9 4 . 3 1 6 7 . 5 8 3 5 N 3 3 ^ 2 1 ’ 2 3 "WN2 8 ^ 1 7 ’ 4 4 ’W 236.46 272.77 283.03 87 . 5 6 90 . 5 8 1 1 0 . 7 1 69 . 0 4R=4012 1 5 . 1 3 48N15^35’55"W95.146328.93262.58 13 5 . 1 8235.17263.6276.96 197.74 22.46 8 0 . 5 6 486 1 .07 N 4 6 ^ 3 8 ’ 4 8 " W 4 2 5 . 9 4 4 7 . 3 8N2 4 ^ 4 8 ’ 4 6 "WN15^34’16"W 366 .25 58.19 92.28 118.4 9 R=930 R=878 125.5 1 N2 5 ^ 2 3 ’ 2 0 "W 5 2 N53^8’13"WN53^8’13"W4 89 . 7 2 502.8 6 80 . 5 2ASHBOURNE DR 54 52 217.0693.48178.05N59^46’23 "W N60^2 7 ’ 2 6 " E R = 7 7 6 R = 8 3 0 135.7 6 186.85R=592 COMMON AREA COMMON AREA COMMON AREA COMMON AREA 2 7 . 2 2 R=465N 3 9 ^ 3 3 ’ 1 6 3 1 6 . 7 0 X-15 FM. 209-96 01-17-0224 26 N70^30’ 5 3 " E 7.38Ac .16Ac .68Ac 1.0Ac COMMON AREA .30Ac 26 TO PG 21 TO PG 21 8/15/12 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 535 ASSESSOR’S MAP CONTRA COSTA COUNTY,CALIF. BOOK PAGE211 26 PURPOSES ONLY. NO LIABILITY IS ASSUMED FOR THE ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION NOTE: THIS MAP WAS PREPARED FOR ASSESSMENT DELINEATED HEREON. ASSESSOR’S PARCELS MAY NOT COMPLY WITH LOCAL LOT SPLIT OR BUILDING SITE ORDINANCES. 1"=100’ 260 260 LYNDHURST PLWENTWOOD DR5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 171819 2021 22 2000 ROLL-POR.TRACT 7578 M.B. 415-4 (NORRIS CANYON ESTATES) "F-3" "O" "P" "F-4" "G-1" "G-2" "Q" "K" "H" 22 21 21 22 01 25 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 131415161718 CANY O N RD 25 19 21 ( PV T. S T. ) .81AC 70 94.20 100.1 0 101.61R=23586.45 2 0 2 . 4 3N2 8 ^ 2 6 ’ 4 1 "W129.19 R=17023.0587.99 65.12 59.15 N7^23’43"EN67^50 ’ 6 ’ E 1 7 6 . 1 5 35.0371.49 381.57 62.44 16.46 80.15 93 97.21 80.08 17.48 186.85194.96162 .78 1 5 5 . 4 1 1 6 0 . 5 7 1 7 7 . 8 2 171.58N16^3’48"W129.15 63.4388.30R=286151.73N65^28 ’ 2 6 " E R=234122.5660.13 45.93 53.73 20 66.42 57.97 22.67 N15^47’24"WN2 6 ^ 5 7 ’ 1 6 "WN2 9 ^ 2 0 ’ 8 "WN2 9 ^ 2 0 ’ 8 "WN23 ^32 ’29 ’WN17^56’17"WN13^34’11"WN1^26’20"WN1^26’20"WN1^26’20"WN0^31’E76.50 78.16 38.08 41.96 80 27.55 29 24.99 30111.97 9.49 64.72 115.2 8 57.35 5.11 116.77 80.05 80.10 168.08 220.3680.01 80.01 181.51 218.11215.55213178.11175.86N54^56’29"WN55^39’56"W 182 .01223.68N86^46’19"E 198.81 N89^36’42"W 331.3638.78 80.01 80.01 80.08 80.08 171.20 R=376 R=424 201.24 21 2 . 7 8 201.57198.80172.54N88^33’40"E 239.04 147.69N2^9’55"WN2^9’55"WN2^9’55"WN2^9’55"WN2^9’55"W220.94 323.33 50N86^51’1"E N89^35’25"W R=23.50 36.91 R=23.50 36.91 97.25 32.84R=25 172.64 N57^8’ 5 8 " E 3 6 6 . 9 0 39.41 152.9627.59103.2 2167.51N22^36 ’49 "W54.12N20^31’59 "WN20^59’56"EN5 4 ^ N 6 6 ^ 1 3 ’ 1 "W 27. 5 9 65 R=930 125.5 1 R=924 R=176 94.36 R=878 312.97 194.48 R=223 N53^3’ 2 7 " E 1 1 9 . 7 1 N53^3’ 2 7 " E 1 2 4 . 3 9 5 2N2 5 ^ 2 3 ’ 2 0 ’W 118.4 9 22.29 4654.99 52 COMMON AREA COMMON AREA COMMON AREA ( PVT. ST. )87.53N89^27’34"W 860.17 48NORR I S 17.55 21.61 R=25 18.45 23.9115.1623.15 422.24 N56^2 7 ’ 4 9 " E X-15 4 209 FM. 209-97 01-17-02 1.71Ac 8/15/12 25 .29Ac SEE APN # 2 1 1 - 2 5 0 - 0 2 6 TO PG 21 TO PG 21 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 536 ASSESSOR’S MAP CONTRA COSTA COUNTY,CALIF. BOOK PAGE211 27 1"=100’ 21 270 270 X-15 PURPOSES ONLY. NO LIABILITY IS ASSUMED FOR THE ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION NOTE: THIS MAP WAS PREPARED FOR ASSESSMENT DELINEATED HEREON. ASSESSOR’S PARCELS MAY NOT COMPLY WITH LOCAL LOT SPLIT OR BUILDING SITE ORDINANCES. POR TRACT 7575 A S H B O U R N E D R WHI T C L I F F E C T ASHBO U R N E C I R 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 95 96 97 "N" "I" "H" "O"ARDLEIGH CT"B-1" "B-2" "G" 10 11 09 16 05 04 03 02 01 12 06 07 08 13 21 21 30 21 30 28 26 . 9 2 N 4 1 ^ 5 6 ’ 5 " W R=2176 7 . 8 7 R=1835 1 . 2 6 4.57 N41^56’5"W 117.59 33.59N5 9 ^ 5 1 ’ 1 6 "W56.91R=40 R=303 6 . 6 3 150.58N5 9 ^ 5 1 ’ 1 6 "W224.58170.89N30^8’44"E1621 5 0 . 8 4 N63 ^ 1 4 ’ 4 "WN30^8’44"E746.0 160.53N29^35’12"ER= 6 1 5 99. 3 4 78. 3 4 165.32N24^41’53"E8 1 . 5 8 N60^54 ’37 "W173.8092.22 15 63. 6 6 156.84N20^53’28"E89.98 N74^ 9 ’ 4 2 " W 220.3 3 130.3 4 129. 8 4 145.36N20^53’28"EN5 9 ^ 5 1 ’ 1 6 "W158.82 R = 5 8 1 93. 8 4 N69 ^ 0 6 ’ 3 2 " W 347. 2 3 R=192 11.0 153. 7 3 176.1 5N52^2’ 3 6 " E R=19211 5 . 0 3 32.48 81.02172.20N18^3’13"WR=1589 6 . 4 8 N74^ 2 0 ’ 2 7 " W 82.74 86.07 R=1378 5.0 R=822 86.02 176N20^48’23 "W N68^29 ’ 3 1 " E N67^13 ’ 1 9 " E 82.71 34 7 . 2 3 N69 ^ 6 ’ 3 2 " W 34.73N16^24’58"ER=822 105.6 3 45.49 N53^4 0 ’ 6 " E R=280138.6513.81N25^17’47"E32. 5 3 N6 4 ^ 4 2 ’ 1 3 "W 125 R=260 28.28229.18N36^22’31"E70 N6 4 ^ 4 2 ’ 1 3 "W49.16N25^17’47"ER=220108.949.63N53^40 ’ 6 " E 176.1 6 256.74 R=770 40.33 R=1430 118.59 185.84N22^39’11 "W 277.37 N55^5 7 ’ 2 7 " E 25 0 N 4 6 ^ 3 4 ’ 1 9 " W27.95 28.2828.2876.168 9 . 9 4 N6 4 ^ 4 2 ’ 1 3 "W 63.6 5 R=240 34.59 98.2 4 R= 7 7 4 498. 8 8 288.65 272.42 N42^22 ’ 5 " E 99.66N26^10’32"E42.67 N88^22’26"W 358.10N7^6’41"W408.27151.76N11^18’56"E155.2 2N52^1 1 ’ 2 1 " E 189.24251.5 8 N74^ 1 8 ’ 5 7 " W211.60N11^21’00"ER = 7 2 6 519.8 0 3 4 . 5 2 N6 4 ^ 4 2 ’ 1 3 "W22N25^17’47"E22N25^17’47"E96. 1 6 R=2 9 9 80.72 R = 2 5 1163.57R=344140.74R=29633 . 8 0 N 4 2 ^ 2 4 ’ 3 6 " W N 4 2 ^ 2 4 ’ 3 6 " W 33 . 8 0 1.66Ac. 84.84176.31N2 4 ^ 4 4 ’ 5 9 "W 25,063SF 13,026SF 13,806SF 13,511SF 19,619SF 19,171SF 15,163SF 15,665SF 39,468SF 81,556SF 53,847SF COMMON AREA COMMON AREA R= 2 4 0R=288210.23168.85FM PG 211-21 2/5/02N23^13’25 "W 5 2 . 0 M.B. 432-30 (NORRIS CANYON ESTATES) 8-6-01 TO PG 21 1/28/13 9.37Ac 16 (PVT STS) (PV T S T S ) "J"30’ PAE1.52Ac March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 537 ASSESSOR’S MAP CONTRA COSTA COUNTY,CALIF. BOOK PAGE211 28 1"=100’ 21 280 X-15 PURPOSES ONLY. NO LIABILITY IS ASSUMED FOR THE ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION NOTE: THIS MAP WAS PREPARED FOR ASSESSMENT DELINEATED HEREON. ASSESSOR’S PARCELS MAY NOT COMPLY WITH LOCAL LOT SPLIT OR BUILDING SITE ORDINANCES.HARDCASTLE CT 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2748 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 "P" "R" "T" "Q"KINGSBRIDGE CTASHBO U R N E C I R POR TRACT 7575 29 21 27 21 36 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 37 25 24 23 26 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 1617 18 19 21 20 22 27 28 29 30 32 33 34 35 36 38 39 31 91.90 88.22 N63^3’35 " E N58^45 ’ 5 7 " E N55^33 ’ 2 " E 78.51 176N20^48’23"W105.38176 N29^7’52"W 101.16176N33^20 ’14 "W 85.99175N3 5 ^ 4 6 ’ 1 9 "W 100.88 N53^4’ 4 " E 104.36 57 49.65 N53^5’ 1 5 " E 161.3 6 1 7 5N3 6 ^ 5 4 ’ 4 5 "W 118.51 N56^31 ’ 3 5 " E 170N32^58’21 "W R=722 503.9385.68 90.55 111.80 N60^37’ 1 4 " E N25^47’11"W105.79 170N18^59’14"WN67^36’47" E 104.59 N74^22’25"E 84.70 170N12^15’56"W82.76 170N5^41’54"W102.18 N81^1’5"E 78.21 94.45 N89^37’4 4 " W 165.01N0^10’59"W79.24 32.38 49.62 170N01^6’55"WN87^45’38" E 70.18 93.75 R=678 331.26170N9^2’15"W69.87 92.63 165N16^51’55"W89.28 165N24^24’35"W67.50 N84^55’25"E N81^8’34"E N69^21’45"E 5.99 74.41 102.37 165N16^44’52"WN68^59’56"E R=522 52R=470 32 51.97R=730 230.99 80 99.03 163.95N17^38’30"W74.90 99.35 156.13N20^50’13"W103.725238.14N13^42’30"W155.72135.61 N84^21’13"E N83^6’41"E 153.58 N72^37’29"E 174.24 27.44 N39^53’ 4 6 " E 74.8639N03^25’20"W113.8648 53R=8762 7 . 4 4 N 4 6 ^ 4 4 ’ 2 6 " W 39.96 R=730 91.0122.8559.41R=924165.44 N82^53’38"E99.0660.67N88^36’48" E 169.48111.60117.90 R=670 467.63 150N7^0’16"W93 80 N79^01’8"E149.66N11^56’49"W83.81 118.16 150N25^3’42"W138.58 107.65 N69^8’42"E N59^0’3 7 " E 1 4 9 . 9 8 N3 6 ^ 4 8 ’ 1 7 "W97 .11 9 8 . 6 9 4 5 . 8 3 117.3 6 N53^5 ’ 1 5 " E 28.28N8^5’15"E77. 1 1N3 6 ^ 5 4 ’ 4 5 "W 1 1 9 . 3 7 4 2 . 2 6 137.18 N53^5 ’ 1 5 " E 141.37 N61^58’ 2 1 " E34 . 74 R=224230.8573.78123.32N25^46’20"W157 N80^50’36"E 124.46N1^38’28"E73.78154 N80 ^ 1 7 ’ 1 0 " W 111.21N9^45’7"E48.5627.31N22^8’6"E16 9 N67^51’54"W 4.6619.88R=25212.96R=4552.9015 8 . 4 7 N 5 3 ^ 3 2 ’ 2 2 " W 34.18 106.10N20^2’44"E101.2 2 N43^1 7 ’ 2 4 " E 88.66 N77^8’37"E170.29N1^54’20"W162.40N68^25’16 "W202.40166.8 0N42^46 ’ 5 7 " E 35.104085.27N25^23’54"W35.4762147.91 N87^56’58" E118.30N23^37’14"E54.7919.88125.2168.92R=25148.78N69^20’54"W51.07N12^46’49"E31.97N22^8’6"E85.38R=176181.38152.48 N85^51’26"E 50 . 1 6 N 5 3 ^ 1 5 ’ 4 7 " W 167.88 N53^3 2 ’ 1 2 " E 963 8 . 0 4N3 6 ^ 5 4 ’ 4 5 "W 1 2 0 . 0 4 8 2 27.8 5 N81 ^ 2 ’ 3 5 " W 112135 R=1430 447.90 N29^45’52 "W 81.99 184.34N27^34’42"W 112.31 185.84N22^39’11"W128.17 N64^59’3 1 " E 5 8 . 1 2 N 4 8 ^ 5 9 ’ 3 0 " W R=1378 473.43 118.50 180.91 5248 17,415SF 16,714SF 14,467SF 17,957SF 19,339SF 17,075SF 16,170SF 15,988SF 15,623SF 14,371SF 13,282SF 14,229SF 13,654SF 12,987SF 14,956SF 22,151SF 18,808SF 16,750SF 14,275SF 12,861SF 13,040SF 18,091SF 15,248SF 18,628SF 13,525SF 14,826SF 15,026SF 14,248SF 12,093SF 13,130SF 18,682SF 15,218SF 13,039SF 19,287SF 15,114SF 12,094SF 13,024SF 13,895SF 12,677SF FM PG 211-21 2/5/02170N18^47’32"WN23^13’25"WR=822 86.02 81.02 40.33 27 M.B. 432-30 (NORRIS CANYON ESTATES) 8-6-01 (PVT S T S ) SEE APN # 2 1 1 - 2 7 0 - 0 1 6 SEE APN # 2 1 1 - 2 7 0 - 0 1 6 (PVT STS )521/28/13 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 538 ASSESSOR’S MAP CONTRA COSTA COUNTY,CALIF. BOOK PAGE211 29 1"=100’ 28 290 PURPOSES ONLY. NO LIABILITY IS ASSUMED FOR THE ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION NOTE: THIS MAP WAS PREPARED FOR ASSESSMENT DELINEATED HEREON. ASSESSOR’S PARCELS MAY NOT COMPLY WITH LOCAL LOT SPLIT OR BUILDING SITE ORDINANCES.KING SBR IDGE CT 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 POR TRACT 7575 X-15 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01 "S" "F" 21 21 21 28ASHB O U R N E C I R N83^6’41"E 153.58 8973.69N18^47’32"W 165.11 N77^17’25 " E 97R=876356.70 169.11 N70^56’ 4 5 " E 164.92 N64^58 ’ 5 1 " E 5 5 . 8 3 73.90 161.62 N63^49 ’ 2 " E 7 9 . 5 7 8 2 N62^55 ’ 6 " E 157.96 8 6 86 .12N2 4 ^ 7 ’ 8 "W621 .3 5 154 6 5 . 1 3 15 . 8 9 145.44 80.11 4.0 115.33N2 6 ^ 4 5 ’ 9 "W 2 8 8 . 9 7 R=25R = 4 5 212.967 5 . 2 4 147.17 N80^54’17"E 42.73 65.3441.97N19^22’30"W107.30 193.87 88 . 0 1 93.19 231.18 N80^54’17"E 29 44.24 R= 2 3 . 5 0 36.9 1 1529144.96 N63^54 ’ 2 6 " E N19^22’30"W 190.56 N64^36 ’ 5 5 " E99.98106.36N15^20’17"W206.35 15 R=23.5036.9147.27 2 8 . 8 7 164.92 N67^48 ’ 4 7 " E 32.2119.88R=254 1 . 9 2 76.08N18^2’25"W 173.73 N63^1 4 ’ 5 1 " E 8 2 . 0 5 170.82 N63^1 4 ’ 5 1 " E 8 2N2 6 ^ 4 5 ’ 9 "W 2 8 8 . 9 7 8 3 . 7 2 8 2167.85 N63^49 ’ 2 " E 8 0 . 0 2 N2 4 ^ 4 3 ’ 1 "W 3 3 7 . 8 9 8 1 . 6 4 92 . 1 0 165 N63^1 4 ’ 5 1 " E 1.41 7 6 . 9 5 165.5 1 N68^1 ’ 9 " E 78.3392.31N19^14’21"W165 N72^52’3 4 " E 83.2398.06N14^32’36"WR=924376.24 165 N78^2’13"E92.31N9^48’18"W165.44 N82^53’38"E 78.3314,040SF 14,888SF 15,182SF 12,891SF 13,591SF 13,889SF 14,128SF 14,346SF 17,543SF 17,302SF 19,163SF 15,617SF 12,487SF 12,150SF 13,415SF 12,902SF 14,721SF 12,939SF5359.41113.86113.86N3^25’20"W48 FM PG 211-21 2/5/02 1.0 1.0 164.90 7 8 . 0 3 2 5 . 5 0 13,992SF 13,018SF78.56 9 2 . 2 0 1/28/13 M.B. 432-30 (NORRIS CANYON ESTATES) 8-6-01 (PVT STS )SEE APN # 211-270-016March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 539 ASSESSOR’S MAP CONTRA COSTA COUNTY,CALIF. BOOK PAGE211 30 1"=1 0 0 ’ 300 PURPOSES ONLY. NO LIABILITY IS ASSUMED FOR THE ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION NOTE: THIS MAP WAS PREPARED FOR ASSESSMENT DELINEATED HEREON. ASSESSOR’S PARCELS MAY NOT COMPLY WITH LOCAL LOT SPLIT OR BUILDING SITE ORDINANCES.ARDLEIGH CTASHB O U R N E C I R HEN L E Y C T 68 69 70 71 72 7374 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 "E" "I" "M" "J" "L" "K" POR TRACT 7575 X-15 21 27 27 21 "C" 28 27 26 25 24 29 19 20 21 22 23 09 10 11 12 18 17 16 15 14 13 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01 2127.95N19^2’23"WR=288 135.9349.16N25^17’47"E108.94R=220N46^34’19" W 495.90 158.11 N41^1 ’ 3 1 " W 167.94N42^5’48"E140.43 R= 4 5 5 48 8 . 0 2 180.60 R=520 93. 4 0 186N63^12’52"E13 0 . 1 0 N 9 ^ 2 9 ’ 3 0 " W92.54160N74^52’2"E13.8170N25^17’47"ER=28028.2832.53 N64^42’13"W 76.16N21^31’56"E28.28N19^42’13"W28.28N70^17’47"E34.52 N64^42’13"W 107.55 R=240 9.14 54.89129.01 N48^33’24"W 115.43N50^4’10"E2222R=272148.7893.89121.66N36^28’54"E150.8 3 N37^ 4 7 ’ 1 3 " W 86.03R=328R=2520.77R= 4 5 209.06 26.82142.01 N61^50’25"W 65.48N41^25’36"E60.35111.07N63^25’57"E120.52N70^13’45"E92.39 N75^35 ’ 8 " W86.14N24^47’26"W140N14^59’52 "E 40 145N65^55’38"E1 08 .7 2N16^29’46"W99.66N26^10’32"E42.67N88^2 2 ’ 2 6 " W 128.71N16^29’46"W 1 1 3 . 5 0 N24^47’26"W 115.62 N75^35 ’ 8 " W 185.19 N66^6’13"W 4 7 . 1 2 153.04 N54^4’51"W 34.7817.33R=25101.12N42^22’5"E272.4290.0430.28R=380107.20166.76 N45^58’0" W 76.9214R=220106.34120.34181.09 N45^58’0" W81.2663.65 89.94 R=240 34.59 98.24 N64^42’13"W 125 R=260 ASHBO U R N E DR ASHBOURNECIRR=580 111.03 112.99N50^4’10"E174.1525.01 53.93138.04 N48^57’01"W 233.18 95.14 28.97 163.87N36^13’43"E102.48 167.44150 8 5 .45N48^38’0"E170N70^23’28"EN 2 8 ^ 4 8 ’ 1 3 "WR= 3 9 5 51 9 . 4 8 14 2 141.2 3 N89^0 ’ 4 1 " W 40.2616 125.64 N77^53 ’ 4 5 " W 125R= 2 7 2 1 1 7 . 5 0 134.14 N82^6’ 2 4 " W 1 0 7 . 4 2 8 4 . 7 3 30.80N44^43’21"E104.06 R=126 30.39 R=424 148.46N7 ^ 9 ’ 3 9 " E 1 9 2 . 1 5 118.0727.17R=25 24 . 0 8 R = 4 5 196.92 65.87 38.803 7 . 4 4 N20^24’1"E23N71^14’9"E150.05N19^56’21"WN57^34’39"E131.2544N31^53’28"E169.34 N69^20’1 8 " W 109.24N14^42’57 "E 77. 5 2 N34 ^ 3 ’ 2 7 " W 162.53N62^59’15"E30.72 R=376 187.19 84.86N62^59’15"E78.98R=215112.46 14.73152.02 206.64 120 N46^51’21" W 509.8652.76N74^32’49"E83. 3 6 N3 4 ^ 3 ’ 2 7 " W139.46N14^42’57 "E 60 77.13 R=174 171.23 173.80N43^15’5"E187.19N21^6’43"E94.10 98 23.07 N58^45’45"W R=2 7 2 205.22N44^57’5"E52N45^49’21"E194.52 R = 2 2 0 264 .5570.03136 N83^3 1 ’ 7 " W56.48R=26 0 88.48 125.20 N77^43 ’ 3 6 " W 111.93133.22 3 2 N12^18’9 "E245.15 6 4 . 6 4 144.75 N87^4’ 5 5 " E 97 1 3 0 . 1 3 N 2 ^ 2 0 ’ 7 " W 53.40 1.93Ac.21,658SF 18,759SF 16,952SF 15,073SF 15,610SF 33,822SF 29,262SF 22,698SF 18,782SF 16,288SF 16,294SF 20,134SF 18,988SF 20,968SF 16,404SF 14,580SF 15,076SF 16,279SF 15,828SF 18,905SF 14,453SF 15,519SF 21,042SF 2.08Ac. FM PG 211-21 2/5/0295.2036.05146. 5 5 N33 ^ 5 0 ’ 9 " W 81.5370.63 12.73 27.5390. 1 5N2 7 ^ 3 6 ’ 2 4 "W 13,609SF 18,516SF 21,281SF 18,002SF (.312Ac.) (.425Ac.) (.489Ac.) (.413Ac.)N27^16’08"E1/28/13 MB 432-30 (NORRIS CANYON ESTATES) 8-6-01 300 TO PG 41 TO PG 21 (PVT STS) SEE APN # 2 1 1 - 2 7 0 - 0 1 6 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 540 ASSESSOR’S MAP CONTRA COSTA COUNTY,CALIF. BOOK PAGE211 31 1"=100’ FM. PG. 21 04-30-02 310 2003 ROLL-X-15 PURPOSES ONLY. NO LIABILITY IS ASSUMED FOR THE ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION NOTE: THIS MAP WAS PREPARED FOR ASSESSMENT DELINEATED HEREON. ASSESSOR’S PARCELS MAY NOT COMPLY WITH LOCAL LOT SPLIT OR BUILDING SITE ORDINANCES. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 67 68 69 70 71 72 M.B. 438-38 (NORRIS CANYON ESTATES PHASE IV) "C" "D" 13 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 09 08 10 11 12 14 15 21 20 19 18 17 16 25 24 "T" "H" "J" "X"81.08R=1781 4 1 . 5 1N56^48’24"W1 6 0 75.99 N76^57’52 " E 137.61N35^55’19"E27.2931.61R=672224.361 1 1 . 8 3 68.92N54^4’41"W180.7593.3027.29 97.4383.32N54^4’41"W180.7592.0848.32148.97N33^4’25"ER=9722 0 9 . 5 1128.36 108 .54 121 . 4 3200.62 N 6 1 ^ 1 5 ’ 8 "W150N25^30’27"E32. 8 3 68.60158.28N32^47’53"E1 48 .49 N 6 1 ^ 1 5 ’ 8 "W 21 3 . 8 0 N6 6 ^ 3 2 ’ 5 6 "WR=1 02 8 224.94 11 1 . 0 3 96. 9 9 N6 6 ^ 3 2 ’ 5 6 "W 21 3 . 7 8 92. 3 5 16 3 . 4 3 N 4 5 ^ 4 0 ’ 1 1 " W N 4 5 ^ 4 0 ’ 1 1 " W 17 8 . 5 0 17 7 . 8 0 R = 4 2 6 3 4 9 . 9 6 193.8 2 N56^4 2 ’ 4 4 " E 2 2 3 . 9 5 N 3 2 ^ 1 8 ’ 5 3 "W 1 3 4 . 9 7 1 0 0 . 2 2 N 3 2 ^ 1 8 ’ 5 3 "W 2 3 5 . 1 9 52.84207.65 N63^6 ’ 1 " E 1 0 3 . 5 6 9.58 120N19^21’32"W129.58 8 3 . 2 1 R = 1 7 6 246N38^48’51"E349.46.91Ac.171.27N40^ 4 5’ 3" E 122.32 59.79 1 2 6 . 4 5 N 3 9 ^ 4 0 ’ 1 6 " W 16.93292.38N34^58’43"E87.60 148.44 N77^41 ’ 4 3 " W 236.03 36.92 89.83 161.4791.4256.42 N78^15’ 3 7 " W 12 5 . 9 4 N 4 4 ^ 4 3 ’ 7 " W 242.57N28^47’25"E57 . 6 3 N 4 6 ^ 5 0 ’ 2 8 " W 13. 1 2 R= 3 7 2 29 N18^7’17"W 280.87R=574141.43N9^33’24"W84.15 N84^46’55"W 299.55 215.4038.77N5^50’26"E1 7 0 . 6 9R= 1 3 5 2232102.05N21^51’57"E31 N78^52’30"E 156.8298R=526254.822 0 3 . 1 9 R = 3 7 6 216.81 N76^3 6 ’ 4 3 " W 4184N19^21’32"W125313.90 N62^1 3 ’ 4 4 " E190 10 R=72457.84R=676HAWKSHEADCIRCLEHAWKSHEADCIRCLE 203.91 CLIFFECASTLER=628383.86294.03R=165 225.91 136.50R=272R=2016.0224.07 N10^13’7"E R=60 75.80 136.45N34^57’3"EASHBOURNECIRCLE 1 6 0 N 4 1 ^ 3 7 ’ 1 5 " W 55.16 R=620 51.84 1 6 0 N 4 0 ^ 5 3 ’ 2 8 " W R=680415.6 5 104.94N51^9’ 2 " E115.33N45^10’21"E 93.44 92.60160N 4 8 ^ 4 5 ’ 5 0 " W114.2956.04N37^17’58"E170.34159.93N56^33’58"W68.3510016 4 . 6 9 N6 4 ^ 5 9 ’ 3 1 "W65.52N26^36’E165.8777.7717 3 . 2 2 N6 4 ^ 5 8 ’ 1 9 "W 20 R=220 265211.96N14^59’32"E21 34 21 34 CT. 52 52 30 5648.07.93Ac. 18,121SF 16,267SF 16,348SF 18,438SF 38,219SF 24,513SF 33,957SF 18,252SF 32,691SF 33,354SF 48,757SF 23,855SF 44,551SF 17,952SF 48,735SF 16,954SF 16,557SF 16,408SF 18,336SF 16,412SF 24,632SF 310 POR. TRACT 7998 (.56Ac) 23 "PCLS D-H" 5.12AC COMMON AREA "E" (1.49AC) (.97Ac)(PVT ST)SEE APN# 211-350-0258/15/12SEE 2 11 -350 -02 5 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 541 ASSESSOR’S MAP CONTRA COSTA COUNTY,CALIF. BOOK PAGE211 32 1"=100’ 320 320 2003 ROLL- X-15 PURPOSES ONLY. NO LIABILITY IS ASSUMED FOR THE ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION NOTE: THIS MAP WAS PREPARED FOR ASSESSMENT DELINEATED HEREON. ASSESSOR’S PARCELS MAY NOT COMPLY WITH LOCAL LOT SPLIT OR BUILDING SITE ORDINANCES. 8 9 10 11 12 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 POR. TRACT 7998 M.B. 438-38 (NORRIS CANYON ESTATES PHASE IV) "M" "E" "F" "G" 02 01 03 04 05 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 09 08 07 06 "N" 19227.27N8^44’20"E176.54N8^44’20"E494.72 N80^26’1 4 " W 256.35 N80^26’14 " W 422.51 166.16 2 0 4 . 1 8 1 2 2 . 4 2 N 3 3 ^ 5 5 ’ 5 8 "W 3 2 6 . 6 0 3 6 5 . 0 3 N 3 3 ^ 5 5 ’ 5 8 "W132.20N3^30’51"E155.78N3^30’51"E50.44 177.70 228.14 N78^55’ 2 8 " W40.20121.44 R = 2 2 4 463.24166.4 4 N59^5 9 ’ 5 0 " E 2 0 0 . 4 0172.86N8^44’20"E256.33 360.05 CIRCLE 229.80 N78^55’ 2 8 " W 50.20 179.60 101.20117.39N8^49’13"E125.69N8^49’13"E31.0531.67N37^13’39"E2 0 2 . 9 8N51^36’27"W109.20N32^50’40"E81.54113.41R=554 843.98 102.60 N51^23 ’ 4 8 " E 209.94N32^50’40"E1 9 9 . 7 9 N 4 1 ^ 2 ’ 3 5 " W 50 53.72 249.95 R=1224R=1762 2 6 . 0 9 139.42N62^1 3 ’ 4 4 " E R = 2 2 4 287.7 5 18 8 . 7 5 94.37 N41^ 2 7’ 3 4 " E 180.01N23^1’53"E272.1 4 141.19 N74^ 3 8 ’ W 157.0 5 170.51N13^28’32"E119.01 R=1176 287.74N10^47’23"E173.5 1 121.13 16.88 311N8^44’20"E149.1 0 122.0 1 23.55 312.31N8^44’20"E140.98 144.17 171.58 219.28N8^44’20"E58.02 22 7 . 8 8R=176 363.97235.20 N83^53’44"E 136.09188.283162.72N37^13’39"E2020 6 . 6 5 N 4 8 ^ 3 ’ 1 6 " W 99.13 96N65^54 ’ 2 1 " E 2 3 8 . 8 6N2 6 ^ 2 8 ’ 5 9 "W 178.03 178 173.07 164. 3 557.42R=506 770.87236.71N7^29’55"W110.9 3 267.49N7^22’51"E160.1 7 257.61N7^47’9"E1 0 0 . 6 4 147.4 2 217.32N7^47’9"E215.72N7^47’9"E157.8 0 R= 5 5 4 N81^15’40 " W 360.05 21 34 33 23 44,781SF 1.32Ac. 50,289SF 33,216SF 34,547SF 33,658SF (1.49Ac) 62,574SF 42,840SF 42,990SF 44,849SF 38,319SF 30,267SF 27,542SF 30,517SF 33,193SF 35,771SF 42,636SF 34,480SF 33,118SF 4848COMMON AREA FM PG 21 04-30-02 HAWKSH E A D SEE 211-310-023 SEE 211-310-023 (.97Ac) 31 23 SEE 211-330-012March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 542 ASSESSOR’S MAP CONTRA COSTA COUNTY,CALIF. BOOK PAGE211 33 1"=100’ 330 X-15 PURPOSES ONLY. NO LIABILITY IS ASSUMED FOR THE ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION NOTE: THIS MAP WAS PREPARED FOR ASSESSMENT DELINEATED HEREON. ASSESSOR’S PARCELS MAY NOT COMPLY WITH LOCAL LOT SPLIT OR BUILDING SITE ORDINANCES. 13 14 1516 17 18 19 20 21 POR TRACT 7998 "G" "F" "O" "N" 01 02 0304 05 06 07 08 09 12 131.1 3 1 9 9 . 7 9 N 4 1 ^ 0 2 ’ 3 5 " W 129.71 2 1 3 . 5 3N2 7 ^ 2 8 ’ 5 2 "W 180.1 5 N51^23 ’ 4 8 " E 85.94 N58^2 3 ’ 1 7 " E 97.40 N58^2 3 ’ 1 7 " E 286.77 N77^28’1" E 96.16 N77^28’1"E 274.03 177.87 121.46 N87^22’30"E 126.49136.86 215.92N14^3’58"W231.55N0^59’2"W75. 7 9 135.87 N87^22’30"E 195. 2 5 N69 ^ 4 9 ’ 1 1 " W 138. 0 2 231.51N13^10’14"E231.95N27^26’43"E68.3577.75 164.05 N87^1’20"E322.87N26^40’56"ER=506 431. 8 0 177.6 5 177.77 359.48 N75^5 6 ’ 2 5 " W 327.91N26^40’56"E176.41 181.71278.33N32^14’46"E232.37N54^31’11"W188. 1 8 R=1 7 4 224.93 51.14 N47^35’4" E 276.06 252.55N54^31’11"W376.4 2 N75^5 6 ’ 2 5 " W 161.29 N87^1’20"E 191. 1 6 N69 ^ 4 9 ’ 1 1 " W 730.56 R=554 R=506 472.77 R=554 R=126 N51^23 ’ 4 8 " E 32 23 34 HAWKSHEADCIRCLE 31,511SF 33,970SF 33,410SF 39,320SF 37,881SF 39,988SF 57,364SF 49,570SF 46,548SF (1.14Ac) 32 48 4 8 50.38FM PG 21 04-30-02 270. 8 8 79.7 3 SEE 211-310-023 SEE 211-310-023 COMMON AREA COMMON AREA M.B. 438-38 (NORRIS CANYON ESTATES PHASE IV) 01-28-02 330 2.47Ac 8/14/12 12 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 543 ASSESSOR’S MAP CONTRA COSTA COUNTY,CALIF. BOOK PAGE211 34 1"=100’ 32 340 340 2003 ROLL-X-15 PURPOSES ONLY. NO LIABILITY IS ASSUMED FOR THE ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION NOTE: THIS MAP WAS PREPARED FOR ASSESSMENT DELINEATED HEREON. ASSESSOR’S PARCELS MAY NOT COMPLY WITH LOCAL LOT SPLIT OR BUILDING SITE ORDINANCES. 22 44 45 46 47 48 49 POR TRACT 7998 M.B. 438-38 (NORRIS CANYON ESTATES PHASE IV) "H" "B" "P" "Y" "K" "V" "U" 06 0507 10 13 04 03 02 11 01 ASHBOURNE CIRCLE"R"HAWKSHEADCIRCLEHAWKSHEADC I R .CLIFFECASTLE141.1 9 N74^3 8 ’ W 215.72N7^47’9"E214.33 R=554109R=1263 0 7 . 2 0198.19 203.1 8 N52^30 ’ 7 " E 130N21^52’11"E180.01N23^1’53"E139.42 N62^13 ’ 4 4 " E 313.90N62^1 3 ’ 4 4 " E 8 9 R = 2 2 4 R=724442.17252.17299.55 N84^46’55"W N5^50’26"E203.47164.70168.23280.52 N84^24’45"W R=215116.28R=676412.86186.7944.20238. 1 7 N69 ^ 1 4 ’ 5 2 " WR=40194.85 19.07R=3022.72R=30 31.06 37.2977.1238.5 1 2 2 . 8 6 37.29 65.50 N41^ 5 8’ 1 0 " E 42.3284.60N4^32’6"W11 1 .48N2 7 ^ 4 6 ’ 3 8 "W 234.35 N71^22’ 5 7 " E 119.567 2 . 2 7 276.06 N47^35’4" E 39.312 6 5 . 4 1N2 7 ^ 4 6 ’ 3 8 "W76.03N4^32’6"W20.4 0 136.23R=48432 N64 ^ 9 ’ 2 8 "W 3 4 . 2 2 R=516 15.15 R=174424 . 2 2 7.41 2.37 3241.7820.91 8.30 20.61 R=17.50 R=17. 5 0 60.70R=51684.15 N41^ 5 8’ 1 0 " E 141 N56^5 5 ’ 3 0 " E 58.32 140.73 N84^41’48"E 199.05 191.28 N84^41’48"E 111.98 151.2 6 N62^40 ’ 2 1 " E 54.81 N76^5 5 ’ 4 7 " W 8 3 . 4 7 N 3 8 ^ 1 1 ’ 2 9 " W111.69N36^58’19"E48 N79^25’ 2 2 " W 75 N 4 1 ^ 5 8 ’ 1 7 " W158N52^4’10"W23 4 . 1 2 N6 3 ^ 3 4 ’ 7 "W 29 0 . 5 1 N 6 1 ^ 2 4 ’ 1 9 "WN54^31’11"W88.42R=1852 6 1 . 0 3N4 9 ^ 5 1 ’ 2 1 "W229.99N29^3’54"E201.86N11^17’22"W203.471 3 2 . 7 6 R = 1 0 5 184.83 COURT R=135 42.236 7 . 5 2N2 7 ^ 1 8 ’ 1 6 "W94.22N34^57’3"E152.29 R=90 22.90 N83^1’7"W R=60 75.80 63.53177.69 R=272 264.52N7^53’45"E185N22^52’19"E33 31 23 35 21 31 48 48303049,246SF 72,909SF87,487SF .99Ac. .64Ac. 48,627SF 49,108SF 53,883SF 1.09Ac. 2.10Ac. 49,770SF FM PG 21 04-30-02 N85^13’51"E DED. TO E.B. REG PARK DIST "G" E.B. REG PARK DIST 12 DED. TO COMMON AREA SEE 211-310-023 35 "J" SEE APN # 211-350-025 SEE APN # 211-350-025(PVT ST)8/15/12 SEE 211-410-001 SEE 211-310-023 TO PG 41 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 544 ASSESSOR’S MAP CONTRA COSTA COUNTY,CALIF. BOOK PAGE211 35 1"=100’ 31 350 2003 ROLL- X-15 PURPOSES ONLY. NO LIABILITY IS ASSUMED FOR THE ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION NOTE: THIS MAP WAS PREPARED FOR ASSESSMENT DELINEATED HEREON. ASSESSOR’S PARCELS MAY NOT COMPLY WITH LOCAL LOT SPLIT OR BUILDING SITE ORDINANCES. 50 51 52 5354 5556 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 POR TRACT 7998 "S" "Q" "R" "B" "A" "I" WIT T E N H A M COU R T ASHBOURNECI R C L E 13 12 04 03 02 01 17 16 15 14 11 1009 22 08 07 20 06 05 21 25 95R=272166 N42^53’ E 1 5 6 . 6 2 N5 0 ^ 1 5 ’ 4 0 "W185N7^53’45"E1 4 2 . 3 3 N 3 3 ^ 4 2 ’ 2 0 " W 8 9 . 6 0 156 N61^4 5 ’ 2 5 " E99 1 2 1 . 7 7 N 4 8 ^ 2 2 ’ 3 5 " W90N27^40’12"E156.69 N87^27’13"E140N2^6’12"E142.2 3 742 6 . 5 4 N 3 3 ^ 2 1 ’ 3 3 "W 181 581.9 2 N74^5 5 ’ 1 " W 202N15^20’11"E195 N6 8 ^ 2 1 ’ 4 2 " W 89 N76^56 ’ 1 4 " W 153.72 N79^1’3 8 " W 60N0^10’47"W1 1 8 . 6 7 N 3 1 ^ 3 5 ’ 3 5 "W66N10^58’22"E196.6 9 62 216.71191.27407.98N10^58’22"E12 3 . 1 1 R= 3 1 5 338.60N28^23’15"E2 4 8 . 6 7 1 0 9 . 2 8 3 5 7 . 9 5N5 0 ^ 5 4 ’ 3 9 "W343.49N6^12’21"E1 1 0 . 9 9R=485 51.3 3 126. 9 7 N70 ^ 4 3 ’ 2 " W 151517. 5 4 R= 5 1 5 37.42 R=25 15301537.42R=2523.95R=51511 1 . 3 9 R = 2 8 5 36.89 581.9 2 N74^5 5 ’ 1 " W 235.7 0164.41N30^1’16"E114.1 2 N52^52 ’ 5 3 " E52.11206.36N5 9 ^ 2 1 ’ 1 1 "W 13 2 . 8 4 N6 5 ^ 5 9 ’ 2 4 "W 118.55 N78^16’ 5 9 " W 122.95 N87^31’9"W 74.53 N87^30’1"W 9 9 . 5 9N3 0 ^ 7 ’ 4 8 "W76.52N2^55’56"W275.88N14^22’43"E164.3 3 149.18N14^50’23"E22.64126.54205 N75^55’8" E 1 8 6 . 65 N6 0 ^ 5 8 ’ 1 8 "W171.5535.11R=22852 160 212 N88^24’46"W 85R=280167.5682.56157. 3 6 N71 ^ 1 ’ 1 0 " W 132.69150.12N11^24’34"E17.43112.10N28^44’25"E10.93159.63N54^7’30"W123.0466.02R=272145 26.54N63^3 1 ’ 3 0 " E 166.1260.0288.07N4^44’29"E2 2 9 . 3 8 159.14 N87^56’17"WR=22028.06142.76N9^41’59"E382.32N6^12’21"E46 8 . 5 7N5 0 ^ 5 4 ’ 3 9 "W236.73N10^58’22"E186.6 1 N74^ 2 6 ’ 1 9 " W 183. 4 8 N6 8 ^ 2 1 ’ 4 9 " W 10 6 . 5 8 N 4 8 ^ 2 2 ’ 5 9 " W 1 4 3 . 1 7 N 3 3 ^ 4 2 ’ 2 0 " W 21 34 23 21 21,327SF 18,137SF 25,316SF 17,681SF 42,593SF 30,331SF64,947SF 57,670SF 37,526SF 49,585SF 42,792SF 18,947SF 17,766SF 16,863SF 16,672SF 19,136SF 17,992SF30(.34Ac) 4 "A" 23 24 127. 6 1 50.6 9 141.36N28^44’30"EN79^25’4 8 " W 241.62 199.61155.07195.87 .459Ac 350 2010 ROLL-A-LT 4 & PCL A TR 8566 A A A A 8/15/12 FM PG 21 4/30/02 25 MB 508-45 (WIEDEMANN RANCH ESTATES) 1/28/09 MB 438-38 (NORRIS CANYON ESTATES PHASE IV) 1/28/02 N36^39’05"E.35Ac28,660SF 13.75 14 6 . 5 9 2.92Ac (.74Ac) 3.32Ac COMMON AREA COMMON AREA COMMON AREA .50Ac (.59Ac) TO PG 41 TO PG 41 FROM PG 21 SEE APN# 211-410-001 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 545 ASSESSOR’S MAP CONTRA COSTA COUNTY,CALIF. BOOK PAGE211 36 1"=200’ 28 360 2006 ROLL- PURPOSES ONLY. NO LIABILITY IS ASSUMED FOR THE ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION NOTE: THIS MAP WAS PREPARED FOR ASSESSMENT DELINEATED HEREON. ASSESSOR’S PARCELS MAY NOT COMPLY WITH LOCAL LOT SPLIT OR BUILDING SITE ORDINANCES. 1 SUDBURY CTCAMBERLY CT01 02 03 04 05 06 07 51 52 08 09 10 11 14 1312 15 1617 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 POR TRACT 7996 101.40 101. 4 0 101 . 40 1 0 1 . 4 0 N77^29’4"E N85^56’57"E N85^35’10"W N77^7’ 1 8 " W N6 8 ^ 3 9 ’ 2 5 " W 165N16^44’52"W77.12 77. 1 2 R=52 2 7 4 0 . 2 1N25^34’31"EN8^16’59"WN0^1’53"EN8^38’46"EN17^6’39"E77.12 7 7 . 1 2 165 1 0 2 . 5 5 100.11N18^24’10"WN3 1 ^ 4 6 ’ 1 "W 54.68165N57^59’47"WN 4 9 ^ 3 1 ’ 5 5 "W N 4 1 ^ 4 ’ 2 " W N 3 2 ^ 3 6 ’ 9 "W 150.93N36^14’9"EN44^42’2"E N53^9’ 5 4 " E N61^3 7 ’ 4 7 " E 2 6 . 1 4 R = 2 5 20 . 5 4 3 8 . 9 5 R=5 5 64.4820.54 R=25183 R=470 319.34 100.75 97 163.95N17^38’30"W63.2040.48183.9275.32129.71156.59 29.6389.7614 2 N62 ^ 1 2 ’ 2 5 "W85.0985.09858514 6 15 0 29.63 83.831 3 2 . 2 1 72.5915 0 858515 0 157.591 1 6 . 8 0 8 2 . 4 0 112 50.23R=25R=5523.67155.16 39 . 5 0 23.6792.3660.92N30^38’53"EN35^1’35"E89.26N17^13’26"W13 3 . 9 6 32.75137.08 N70^20’ 4 6 " E 1 5 8 . 7 3N2 7 ^ 3 6 ’ 4 5 "W 34 . 9 3 179.38N25^52’11"E33.96 166.32 23.88 N84^54’33"W 182N17^22’10"W37.80 153.42N27^47’35"E1 3 8 . 0 7 89.89N46^47’5"EN62 ^ 1 2 ’ 2 5 "W33.21R=45212.9 6 R=25 37.5919.891 8 8 . 2 5 R=470347.4432.45151.01 N82^45’37"E 120177.5782.1879.49N82^36’40" W N18^46’18"E262.66117.51R=522134.10 2 7 . 1 1 85.76 172.81N5^35’26"E213.39 195.06 408.45 N80^58’36"E 105.63 108.80 107. 4 3 3 0 . 9 8 107.43 1 0 8 . 8 0 1 0 8 . 8 0 2 1 4 . 2 4 N 3 2 ^ 1 0 ’ 4 2 "W83.83 174.24 N72^37’ 2 9 " E 264.28N18^47’32"W 2 4 4 . 7 2N24 ^7 ’8 "W 333.74 N84^3’3"E 1296650.8318 2 . 4 9 N6 6 ^ 5 3 ’ 7 "W 16 5N61 ^ 2 8 ’ 3 1 "W101101117.36N32^15’35"E357.54R=1105178 N6 6 ^ 4 2 ’ 4 4 "W117.36N14^18’58"E165 N71 ^ 5 6 ’ 5 7 " W 101116.04N15^25’57"E165 3 7 6 . 6 3N24 ^7 ’8 "W 75. 3 1 93. 9 1 48.90 154N29^36’1"E54.635 R=25 19.89 3 6 N6 6 ^ 1 0 ’ 1 6 " W 205.56N58^4’20"W84 . 8 3196.79 27.1350.06229.13 N75^25’5 4 " E 27.1184.76 164.35129. 8 7111.05140.42N30^28’14"E35.5535.42 51.3 7 R=45 21 2 . 9 6 16 1 . 1 8 76.03N45^37’43"EN5 9 ^ 1 8 ’ 1 1 "W 85.83 N55^7 ’ 2 5 " E 95.44N46^37’31"E 139.9886.83 111.3 2 N45^37’43"E N55^7 ’ 2 5 " E 19. 8 8 6 169.04N14^12’23"W130.16 93.72 36.44 N6 7 ^ 4 7 ’ 1 6 " W 79.2077.37 N78^38’ 4 4 " W 10.106Ac 175.21N27^20’26"E172.82121.84164.6491.06100.99R=522190.2510812N59^29’33 "W 165 N6 5 ^ 2 2 ’ 8 "W11092.72N27^20’26"EN21^38’18"E91.46108.50165 165 N15^41’38"EN71 ^ 2 1 ’ 1 5 " W N77^1 5 ’ 2 8 " W 85.1686.27N15^41’38"EN21^28’19"E50.07 392.67 N80^29’3 9 " W 2.39 301.16N2^49’38"E9 9 9 . 9 6N2 6 ^ 3 5 ’ 3 1 "W 450 N89^4’30"W 20.0129 37 21 22 21ASHBOURNECIR234 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1617 18 19 20 21 22 "A" "T" "T" "B" 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 "H" "I" FM PG 21 8/9/05 MB 473-46 1/31/05 (NORRIS CANYON ESTATES PHASE III) 21 N9^01’24"W 46.35 52165N27^46’16"E43.16 40.331.67R = 2 5N9^11’23"W8565.08 N73^19’4 0 " E N28^54’51"W 8/15/12 496.02 (36.32) (45.74) 132.94(T ) N85^34’09"E 11.65 (67.47) (103.34)117.9189.09N12^16’51"E68. 9 6 N6 5 ^ 2 4 ’ 1 6 "W23.3071.52N29^2’7"W231.18 N80^54’17"E N64^36 ’ 5 5 " E N10^09’11"EN77^11 ’ 1 0 " W 102.63116.59N4^51’41"E72. 0 6 52 5.200Ac "J" FROM PG 37 19 8 . 6 7 N 4 7 ^ 1 4 ’ 4 2 " W S E E A P N # 2 1 1 - 3 7 0 - 0 7 0 (PVT STS)51,52 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 546 C R A N L E I G H C T ASSESSOR’S MAP CONTRA COSTA COUNTY,CALIF. BOOK PAGE211 37 1 " = 2 0 0 ’ 370 2006 ROLL- PURPOSES ONLY. NO LIABILITY IS ASSUMED FOR THE ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION NOTE: THIS MAP WAS PREPARED FOR ASSESSMENT DELINEATED HEREON. ASSESSOR’S PARCELS MAY NOT COMPLY WITH LOCAL LOT SPLIT OR BUILDING SITE ORDINANCES. 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 69 11 12 13 14 15 62 1617 1863 19 20 212223 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 64 54 55 56 57 58 70 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 3839 40 41 42 43 4445 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 "J" "C" "D" "E" "F" "G"165N77^15 ’28 "W 109.50 109 107.34 83.60 330.29 92.30 91.88 90.46 1 6 5 1 6 5 1 6 5 . 3 2 1 6 5 . 2 5 N8 3 ^ 1 2 ’ 5 8 "W N 8 9 ^ 8 ’ 4 9 " W N 8 5 ^ 0 ’ 4 5 " E 17.08 98 N5^48’40 " W 368.36 N5^55’1 " W100 10183.76 N 8 4 ^ 4 ’ 5 9 " E 1 6 5 . 0 7 N 8 4 ^ 4 ’ 5 9 " E N 8 4 ^ 4 ’ 5 9 " E 1 3 5 100 5 0 103.70 N19^15’9 " E 66.10 15.75 N68^55’5"W10.26 27.434 0 . 9 2 27.43 4 0 . 9 2 116.1 9 165N77^11’10"W 102.63 101.4 8 111.6 9 45.45 R=11 0 5 R=105 3 357.54 1 6 5 1 6 5 1 8 7 . 7 0 117.9 1 116.5 9 89.09 N8 2 ^ 3 0 ’ 2 8 "W N 8 7 ^ 4 6 ’ 1 0 "WN8 0 ^ 2 9 ’ 2 9 "W 18.77 28.28 1 6 7 . 9 3 134.3 6N2^32’ 8 " W N12^16 ’ 5 1 " E N4^51 ’ 4 1 " E ASH BOURNE CIR 28.2898.75 1 6 9 . 0 7 N 8 4 ^ 4 ’ 5 9 " E 1 4 9 . 0 7 118.75N5^55’1 " W 45.45 69.08 114 17 9 . 3 9 N 8 4 ^ 4 ’ 5 9 " E 98.41 83.07 86.82 N2^38 ’ 1 2 " E 268.3 0 N2^19 ’ 4 0 " W 48.84 68 N5^55’1 " W 261.591 9 1 . 5 6 N 8 9 ^ 5 3 ’ 5 4 " E 116 116 1 8 8 . 3 3N8 0 ^ 1 0 ’ 5 5 "W170N70^15’43"W75 . 8 2 116.80 15 . 2 5 88 . 4 4 168.70 N5^55’1 " W 12 8 . 4 3 159.59 N10^59 ’ 2 5 " E 54 . 3 7 19.89 16.1 1 14 3 . 1 1 N 7 9 ^ 1 0 ’ 4 8 " E 133.231 7 3 . 22 N64^2 ’35 "E41.6747.70 211.91 N7^10’27 " W 78.68 134.18 N24^3’54"E 50.89139.225 4 . 6 1 212.96152.9150.1 9 10 0 . 3 7 14.61R=2 5 R=2519.8 8 70 . 4 2 160.4 0 N12^ 3 9’ 5 5 " W 34 . 1 3 54 . 8 588.5920.08 166.98 4 5 . 4 0 1 4 0 . 2 4 143.80 160 . 3 2 N7 9 ^ 4 ’ 5 8 "W169.3950.57N67^40’17"W219.97176.57 N13^41 ’ 2 9 " E 157.23 N13^41 ’ 2 9 " E 56.4399 . 4 5 N 8 2 ^ 1 5 ’ 3 0 " E 157.61 N24^3’54"E 279.18 N7^10’27 " W 32 2 . 6 8 N 7 9 ^ 1 0 ’ 4 8 " E 27.31 N55^19’6"W 69.30N5^48’40 " W 86.26 86.63 87.11 5 0 . 0 7 100.86 211.01N59^40’4"WR=722 107.2898 160N51^9’15"W160.84131 119.63160160N43^22’38"W25.0151.56135.62 138.44 N42^44’4"E N34^57’26"E50.31119 122.6 8 95.9 8 50.16160N33^46’35"WN52^ 1 1 ’ 5 6 " E 102. 0 7 N5 6 ^ 3 1 ’ 1 7 " E 88.85 88.71 N46^19’ 3 2 " E 88.71 N41^4’22"E 33.78 75 . 9 9 N52^ 1 1 ’ 5 6 " E 25. 2 7 82. 7 3 102. 3 5N35^47’42"W93.30 R=1178 108 160N56^48’24"W108 93.30 108 N51^33’14"W93.30 93.30 108 21.5090.0 R=620 N59^44’56"W97.05 97.0 5 109.64 109.65 109. 6 5 R=1230 622.1 1 595.8 1 N32^30’41"E N37^1’56"E 97.05N55^13’42"WN50^42’27"WN46^11’12"WN41^39’57"WN37^8’43"WN32^37’28"WN60^32’47"W160N50^6’48"WN40^16’45"W122 115 99.4 9 18. 3 2 R=670 96.3 3 87.43 92.74 N34^40’12"E N44^48’14 " E N54 ^ 4 7 ’ 4 9 " E N55 ^ 6 ’ 5 5 " E N50^3 5 ’ 4 0 " E N46^4’2 5 " E N41^33’10"E 86.68 N42^58’23"E N32^25’56"E 90.97 160117 N52^25’59"WN41^37’15"WN 8 4 ^ 4 ’ 5 9 " E 1 8 . 8 5 7 4 . 2 6 170 N8^18 ’ 4 5 " E 1 2 8 . 4 1 N 8 7 ^ 4 4 ’ 3 1 " E WYCOMBECT94.13149.5 4N77^26 ’30 "W 2 0 2 .5 4 182.60 N26^21’3"E5394.9295.9110.0R=2992 6 4 . 3 0R=2512 2 1 . 8 7 1 4 8 . 0 3 72.06 150 N27^52’26"EN45^15’49"W204.46109.54187.37 N37^58’1"E 73.8457.66114.6784N47^14’42"W198.67158 N34^32’E111.8368.96N65^24’16"W182 N21^22’12 " E 6 6 . 0 2 23.30 133.60154.89 N29^52’1"E 2 9 . 4 4 12.41 1 2 1 . 0 8 71.52N29^2’7"W23 1 . 1 8 N 8 0 ^ 5 4 ’ 1 7 " E 1 9 0 .5 6 N64^36’55"E 20 121.51 37.34R=25206.35N15^20’17"W76.08N18^2’25"W146.32173.92 N37^38’5"E 70.4031.0365.9640.0356.8350156.81 N36^52’17"E 83.29R=45180.39 30.62102.84138.2118.15 11.85 13.20 28.77 R=20 10.81 30.42 R = 2 0 30 42.5092.7772.85166.96 N33^7’8"E 188.21N62^26’59"W20.66210.43 N37^38’5"E 157.90N45^32’7"W192.2 4 N52^ 3 7 ’ 3 1 " E 100N34^51’15"WR=2154.26 179. 3 9 N54 ^ 2 8 ’ 3 0 " E 66.48 168.87N49^56’31"W56.70R=164120 . 33 136.59 N28^40’31"E 63.63 2 9 . 4 4 5 7 . 0 1141.24N73^20’46"WR=324R=276 POR TRACT 7996 .300Ac. .640Ac. 1.060Ac 21 23 21 36 113.61 29 31 21 38 PVT STS FM PG 21 8/9/05 N10^09 ’ 1 1 " E 5296.45 52N46^18’03"WN41^02’53"WN 7 6 ^ 5 7 ’ 5 2 " E N35^49’11"E MB 473-46 (NORRIS CANYON ESTATES PHASE III) 1/31/05 81.08 R=672 224.36 "AA"67 11 9 . 9 3 100.22 .391Ac A A A A 5 "B" LT 5 & PCL B TR 8566 MB 508-45 (WIEDEMANN RANCH ESTATES) 1/28/09 96 . 4 1 81.85 R= 4 5 A-2010 ROLL- 1.957Ac TO PG 36 7.30Ac PVT STS 8/15/12 69,70 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 547 84 83 82 81 80 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 ASSESSOR’S MAP CONTRA COSTA COUNTY,CALIF. BOOK PAGE211 38 1"=200’ 30 380 2006 ROLL- PURPOSES ONLY. NO LIABILITY IS ASSUMED FOR THE ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION NOTE: THIS MAP WAS PREPARED FOR ASSESSMENT DELINEATED HEREON. ASSESSOR’S PARCELS MAY NOT COMPLY WITH LOCAL LOT SPLIT OR BUILDING SITE ORDINANCES. "L" "K" "R" "Q" "P" "O" "M" "N" 01 02 03 04 46 05 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 06 07 47 08 09 14 15 16 17 45 44 42 19 18 20 21 22 13 12 11 10 49 43 25 24 23 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 41 40 48 EBMUD 160 N88^24’46"W96.0R=280150.12N8^14’6"W160 N71^56’ 3 5 " E59 150.12N11^24’34"E123.04N28^44’25"E88.07N4^44’29"E142.76N9^41’59"E77.53 R=220 211.96N14^59’32"E165.87N26^36’E170.34N37^17’58"E115.33N45^10’21"E301.2 7 N74^ 4 4 ’ 2 2 " W 3 7 . 0 3 1 2 9 . 4 2N2 5 ^ 4 9 ’ 3 "W98.17 160 N59^5 2 ’ 1 2 " E 9 4 180 N62^5 2 ’ 4 1 " E N18^20’32"W31.03175.27180 N71 ^ 2 8 ’ 3 0 " W R=22041.30166.201 6 0N2 8 ^ 1 1 ’ 2 8 "W 107.83 N61^4 1 ’ 2 5 " E N61^4 8 ’ 3 2 " E 116.2 8 14.75 1 6 0N2 5 ^ 9 ’ 5 0 "W 16 0 N 4 3 ^ 3 3 ’ 1 1 " W 51.03 80 25.58 1 6 5N2 8 ^ 1 1 ’ 2 8 "W 121.0 5N60^5 3 ’ 4 2 " E 1 6 5 N 3 3 ^ 3 4 ’ 4 6 " W 90165N52^32’16"W143.94N46^56’29" E 180.6 5N57^4 7 ’ 4 0 " E R=272275.5890165 N71 ^ 2 9 ’ 4 5 " W 70102.99 N85^5’32"E 17.30149.39N1^52’3"W173.58160N28^38’25"ER= 3 2 6 5 3 4 . 2 7 61 2 . 9 3R= 3 7 4 5235.11205 N75^55’8" E 3 6 . 0 3 76.52N2^55’56"WR=228126.21N 3 0 ^ 7 ’ 4 8 "W 9 5 4 . 5 9 180 N59^5 2 ’ 1 2 " E 180.0 4 N59^5 2 ’ 1 2 " E74R=27226.07165.58N1^45’13"E152 122.95 N87^31’9"W 118.55 N78^16’ 5 9 " W207N29^32’21"E1 6 7 N 4 2 ^ 1 3 ’ 7 " W 109178N46^14’15"E 1 5 7 . 2 7N2 8 ^ 5 9 ’ 1 1 "W 1 0 8 160 N62^46 ’ 5 8 " E 1 2 6 . 7 6 210 N75^53’37 " E 2085.5885.50160 N88^59’31"E 136.85N13^43’36"E83.37 10050.08 181.10N13^43’36"E14 8 . 4 7 N 4 9 ^ 2 4 ’ 4 3 " W 1 9 3 . 7 7N2 8 ^ 5 9 ’ 1 1 "W 1 3 3 . 2 5 1 3 3 . 2 5 160 N52^3’ 3 4 " E 67 . 3 8 6 7 . 3 8 160 N75^28’44 " E76.8942.9181.75167.50 N88^59’31"E 10191.76 N1^0’29"W283.66N2^4’20"E497.17R=78 85 . 6 679.10N5^39’21"E83.152.560Ac. .390Ac.69.80159.01N36^32’46"E91.4397 .3 918.48N6^29’49"WN22^52 ’ 34 "W214.51205.22N44^57’5"E135 . 1 9 N6 6 ^ 3 0 ’ 1 5 " W 212.96R= 4 5 143.1 6 5.10 79.1241.73R=384 7 . 2 0N2 8 ^ 4 ’ 5 6 "W 1 7 2 . 7 6 33.89 69.31 80 . 2 5 53.28 40.20 13.08 79.77112.88N2^22’31"W37.27137.08N39^39’31"E5 4 . 8 1R=2 8 56.27 2 7 N56^1’37"W117.57137.4733N39^39’31"E35.3749.76R=78R=781 6 2 . 1 6 1 3 4 . 3 5N2 8 ^ 4 ’ 5 6 "W130.98N3^6’13"EN39^39’31"E93.14224.05N18^25’40"E162.53 N62^5 9 ’ 1 5 " E 30.72 R=21 5 N 4 6 ^ 5 1 ’ 2 1 " W 47 8 . 6 6 86.68 N42^58’ 2 3 " E90.97109.64109.65109.65 109.65 N32^25’56"EN32^30’41"EN37^1’56"EN46^4’25"E N50^35 ’ 4 0 " E 543.01 N77^55’ 0 8 " W 156.53N37^15’22"E140.5616 0N61 ^ 5 6 ’ 5 "W 75.0789.8389.83R=2807 5 3 . 6 0 210 N80^18’5 9 " W97.83188 N79^39’52"E105.56178.17N17^9’51"W95 . 4 4 1 3 7 . 0 4 N 4 9 ^ 5 0 ’ 2 0 " W 32.89 10 5 . 6 8 36. 5 4 7 5 . 7 7 N 3 3 ^ 1 8 ’ 4 4 "W N78^42’ 1 8 " W 23.53168.86N26^9’31"E94.36 124.84 189.98N33^27’11"E60 R= 2 2 052R=272228.92 20 6 . 4 7 R = 2 2 8165 N34^41’57"E75.39 N81^30’44" W165N2^19’51"E1 9 4 . 3 1 5 2 . 0 8 1 6 5 N 4 7 ^ 3 8 ’ 3 1 " W 72.10 77.40WINSFORD CTASHB O U R N E CIRCIR 35 31 21 21 21 POR TRACT 7996 37 MB 473-46 1/31/05 (NORRIS CANYON ESTATES PHASE III) 3.73Ac .41Ac .62Ac 8.17Ac 1.95Ac FM PG 21 8/9/05 34 ASHRNE BOU.78Ac .49Ac N87^30’01"WHEN L EY C T N58^5 7 ’ 0 1 " E PVT STS 155104.94 N51^9’ 2 " E 1 1 . 5 5353.02140.6 2 N55^2 8 ’ 5 4 " E143.94N27^59’E26.07 91.11 9 9 . 5 9 N 3 0 ^ 7 ’ 4 8 "W 102.99 N85^5’32"E 182.34N16^42’58"E74.53 72. 8 510016096.45N1^0’29"W14 6 . 5 9 N6 5 ^ 5 9 ’ 2 4 "W 160 N88^59’31"E 19.8878.51 118.43 N63^37 ’ 5 4 " E88.37N3^6’13"E42.4552.76 84.86 14.73 78.98 109. 6 5 N41^33’10"E167.92N7^44’25"W200.56 N58^3 ’ 5 4 " E153.96N38^32’10"E15.95613.6522.45 147. 6 3 165 N83^31’43"E 52.08194.31 "B B " TO PG 21 8/15/12 TO PG 41 TO PG 41 TO PG 41 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 548 ASSESSOR’S MAP CONTRA COSTA COUNTY,CALIF. BOOK PAGE211 411"=200’ 410 M.B. 432-30 (NORRIS CANYON ESTATES) PURPOSES ONLY. NO LIABILITY IS ASSUMED FOR THE ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION NOTE: THIS MAP WAS PREPARED FOR ASSESSMENT DELINEATED HEREON. ASSESSOR’S PARCELS MAY NOT COMPLY WITH LOCAL LOT SPLIT OR BUILDING SITE ORDINANCES. "A" COMMON AREA "R" "O" "M" "N" "P" "Q" 30 27 23 38 "E" "S" "Q" "R" "P" "R" 38 35 34 POR TRACT 7575A - 2002 ROLL- A A A A C C PCL A TR 8566 MB 508-45 C C B - 2003 ROLL- C - 2006 ROLL- POR TRACT 7998 POR TRACT 7996 C C C C C C CC C C C B B B B B B B B B B B B M.B. 438-38 (NORRIS CANYON ESTATES PHASE IV) M.B. 473-46 (NORRIS CANYON ESTATES PHASE III) FM. PGS 30,34,35,38 8-15-12 N07^53’45" E 2 6 4 . 5 2 N2 2 ^ 5 2 ’ 1 9 " E 1 8 5 . 0 0177.69N52^04’10"W 158.00N84^41’48"E 199.05N 5 6 ^ 5 5 ’ 3 0 " E 1 4 1 . 0 0 84 . 1 5 22.86 60 . 7 0 N84^41’48"E 191.2820.91 8.30 2.37 75.00 48.00N61^24’19"W 290.51N50^15’40" W 179.06156.62143.1 7 106.5 8 N33^42 ’ 2 0 " W 1 4 2 . 3 3 183.48N68^21’42"W 195.0089.00N74^26’19"W 186.6160.00 118.6 7 66.00 62.00N10^58’ 2 2 " E 4 0 7 . 9 8 N10^58’ 2 2 " E 2 3 6 . 7 3 N50^54’39" W 468.57 N50^54’39" W 357.95 N06^12’21"E 34 3 . 4 9 N06^12’21"E 3 8 2 . 3 2155.07N28^44’30 "E 199 .61N79^25’48"W 241.62195.87N59^21’11"W 206.361 1 4 . 1 2 182.3 4 N29^32’21"E 207 .00R=374.0072.85167.00 126.76N28^5 9 ’ 1 1 " W 1 5 7 . 2 7 193.77 N49^ 2 4’ 4 3" W 1 4 8. 4 7 N13^4 3 ’ 3 6 " E 1 5 6 . 8 5 181.10 96.45 100.0076.6385.66R=78.0079.10 162.1 6 N28^04 ’ 5 6 " W 1 3 4 . 3 5 130.98 42.4588.379 3 . 1 4 49. 7 6 N 3 9 ^ 3 9 ’ 3 1 " E 1 7 0 . 4 7 N18 ^ 2 5 ’ 4 0 " E 2 2 4 . 0 5154.84112.88 153.6797.39 91.43 101.00 81.75 67.38 67.381 6 0 . 0 0 R=326.00173.58N01^52’03"W 149.39 1 4 3 . 9 4 7 2 . 1 0 1 2 1 . 0 5 N 4 6 ^ 5 6 ’ 2 9 " E 1 4 3 . 9 4 52.0 8 52.08 75.39165.00 206.47N 4 4 ^ 5 7 ’ 0 5 " E 2 0 5 . 2 2 N46^51’ 2 1 " W 4 7 8 . 6 6 7 8 . 9 8 8 4 . 8 614.7330.72 1 6 2 . 5 3 83.36N14^4 2 ’ 5 7 " E 1 3 9 . 4 6 109.2 4 77.5244.001 3 1 . 2 523.00125.6416.0040.26N66^06’13"W 185.19115.62113.50 128.7142.67108.72 86.14 92.39120.52111.07 65 . 4 8121.661 1 5 . 4 3 1 1 2 . 9 9 25.01 53.93N48^ 5 7’ 0 1" W 2 3 3. 1 8 85.45 121. 7 7 20.61 01 15.89Ac ASHBOU R N E C I R CIRASHBO URNER=272ASHBOURNECIR R=272ASHBOURNECIRMarch 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 549 RECOMMENDATION(S): AUTHORIZE the discharge from accountability for certain Health Services accounts which are not collectible due to one or more of the following reasons: the accounts are being discharged in bankruptcy; debtors are deceased, the statute of limitations for pursuing recovery of the debt has expired; the cost of recovery is excessive; and/or the debtor no longer resides in the state. FISCAL IMPACT: The charges of the accounts to be discharged total $7,119,735.24. These accounts cover multiple years from 2004 to 2015. No net impact on the Enterprise Fund or General Fund. Reserves for these accounts were established during the year of service delivery. BACKGROUND: The Health Services Department has received confirmation from Rash Curtis & Associates (collection service) that these accounts in the collection system are not recoverable due to one or more of the following reasons: the accounts are being discharged in bankruptcy; debtors are deceased; the statute of limitations for pursuing recovery of the debt has expired; the cost of recovery is excessive; or the debtor no longer resides in the state. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 03/08/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Patrick Godley, 957-5410 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: March 8, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: T Scott, M Wilhelm, Jose Reyes C. 47 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Discharge from Accountability for Certain Health Services March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 550 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Based on the stated facts, the Health Services Department should write off these accounts as "Charity Care" pursuant to Contra Costa Health Services Compliance Charity Care Program Policy #708-C. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Health Services Enterprise Fund I will continue to carry uncollectible accounts and reserves in the books, thereby overstating the receivable and reserve accounts. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: No impact. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 551 RECOMMENDATION(S): ACCEPT the Treasurer's Quarterly Investment Report (the "Report") as of December 31, 2015, as recommended by the County Treasurer-Tax Collector. FISCAL IMPACT: None BACKGROUND: Government Code Section 53646 requires the County Treasurer to prepare quarterly reports to the Board of Supervisors describing County investments including type, par value, cost, and market value. Attached please find the report covering the period October 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015. As of December 31, 2015, the par value, cost, and market value of Contra Costa County Investment Pool were $3,223,855,273.60, $3,224,114,720.65, and $3,222,613,057.91, respectively. The weighted yield to maturity was 0.64% and the weighted average days to maturity were 228 days. As of December 31, 2015, The Treasurer’s investment portfolio was in compliance with Government Code 53600 et. seq. and with the Treasurer’s current investment policy. Historical activities combined with future cash flow projections indicate that the County has sufficient liquidity to meet its obligations for the next six months. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 03/08/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Brice Bins, (925) 957-2848 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: March 8, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: County Administration C. 44 To:Board of Supervisors From:Russell Watts, Treasurer-Tax Collector Date:March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Treasurer's Quarterly Investment Report as of December 31, 2015 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 552 ATTACHMENTS Quarterly Report 12/31/15 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 553 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY TREASURER’S QUARTERLY INVESTMENT REPORT AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2015 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 554 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. Executive Summary 1 II. Contra Costa County Investment Pool Summary 2 III. Appendix A. Investment Portfolio Detail—Managed by Treasurer’s Office 1. Portfolio Summary 5 2. Portfolio Detail 11 3. Market Valuation Sources 36 B. Investment Portfolio Detail – Managed by Outside Contracted Parties 1. State of California Local Agency Investment Fund a. Summary 37 2. Asset Management Funds a. Wells Capital Management 38 b. CalTRUST 73 3. East Bay Regional Communications System Authority (EBRCS) a. Summary 78 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 555 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Treasurer's investment portfolio is in compliance with Government Code 53600 et. seq.. The Treasurer's investment portfolio is in compliance with the Treasurer's current investment policy. The Treasurer’s investment portfolio has no securities lending, reverse repurchase agreements or derivatives. As of 12/31/15, the fair value of the Treasurer’s investment portfolio was 99.95% of the cost. More than 80 percent of the portfolio or over $2.59 billion will mature in less than a year. Historical activities combined with future cash flow projections indicate that the County is able to meet its cash flow needs for the next six months. Treasurer’s Investment Portfolio Characteristics Par $3,223,855,273.60 Cost $3,224,114,720.65 Market Value $3,222,613,057.91 Weighted Yield to Maturity 0.64% Weighted Average Days to Maturity 228 days Weighted Duration 0.62 year March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 556 PERCENT OF TYPE PAR VALUE COST FAIR VALUE TOTAL COST A. Investments Managed by Treasurer's Office 1. U.S. Treasuries (STRIPS, Bills, Notes)$37,620,000.00 $37,709,584.04 $37,498,251.55 1.17% 2. U.S. Agencies Federal Home Loan Banks 235,002,000.00 235,686,775.32 234,766,456.59 7.31% Federal National Mortgage Association 92,526,000.00 93,165,884.29 92,780,150.98 2.89% Federal Farm Credit Banks 174,036,000.00 173,967,580.30 173,686,024.99 5.40% Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 116,709,000.00 116,860,276.40 116,442,826.83 3.62% Municipal Bonds 5,555,000.00 5,784,587.02 1 5,784,587.02 1 0.18% Subtotal 623,828,000.00 625,465,103.33 623,460,046.41 19.40% 3. Money Market Instruments Commercial Paper 955,477,000.00 953,197,334.12 953,986,318.53 29.56% Negotiable Certificates of Deposit 794,998,000.00 794,994,780.00 795,613,065.63 24.66% Medium Term Certificates of Deposit 4,200,000.00 4,200,000.00 4,189,290.00 0.13% Money Market Accounts 565,318.32 565,318.32 565,318.32 0.02% Time Deposit 3,335.77 3,335.77 3,335.77 0.00% Subtotal 1,755,243,654.09 1,752,960,768.21 1,754,357,328.25 54.37% 4. Asset Backed Securities/Mortgage Backed Securities 4,562,799.15 4,571,755.84 4,571,755.84 0.14% 5. Corporate Notes 149,457,000.00 150,021,616.02 149,626,439.26 4.65% TOTAL (Section A.)2,570,711,453.24 2,570,728,827.44 2,569,513,821.31 79.73% B. Investments Managed by Outside Contractors 1. Local Agency Investment Fund 209,721,646.14 209,721,646.14 209,551,134.68 2 6.50% 2. Other a. EBRCS Bond 2,232,756.90 2,232,756.90 2,232,756.90 0.07% b. Wells Capital Management 44,255,885.01 44,497,957.86 44,381,812.71 3 1.38% c. CalTRUST (Short-Term Fund)148,462,420.81 148,462,420.81 148,462,420.81 4.60% Subtotal 194,951,062.72 195,193,135.57 195,076,990.42 6.05% TOTAL (Section B.)404,672,708.86 404,914,781.71 404,628,125.10 12.56% C. Cash 248,471,111.50 248,471,111.50 248,471,111.50 7.71% 4GRAND TOTAL (FOR A , B, & C)$3,223,855,273.60 $3,224,114,720.65 $3,222,613,057.91 100.00% Notes: 1. Fair Value equals Cost less Purchase Interest 2. Estimated Fair Value 3. Base Market Value plus Accrued Interest 4. Does not include the Futuris Public Entity Trust of the Contra Costa Community College District Retirement Board of Authority CONTRA COSTA COUNTY INVESTMENT POOL As of December 31, 2015 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 557 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY INVESTMENT POOL AT A GLANCE AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2015 NOTES TO INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO SUMMARY AND AT A GLANCE AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2015 1. All report information is unaudited but due diligence was utilized in its preparation. 2. There may be slight differences between the portfolio summary page and the attached exhibits and statements for investments managed by outside contractors or trustees. The variance is due to the timing difference in recording transactions associated with outside contracted parties during interim periods and later transmitted to the appropriate county agency and/or the Treasurer’s Office. In general, the Treasurer’s records reflect booked costs at the beginning of a period. 3. All securities and amounts included in the portfolio are denominated in United States Dollars. 4. The Contra Costa County investment portfolio maintains Standard & Poor's highest credit quality rating of AAAf and lowest volatility of S1+. The portfolio consists of a large portion of short-term investments with credit rating of A-1/P-1 or better. The majority of the long-term investments in the portfolio are rated AA or better. 5. In accordance with Contra Costa County's Investment Policy, the Treasurer's Office has constructed a portfolio that safeguards the principal, meets the liquidity needs and achieves a return. As a result, more than 80% of the portfolio will mature in less than a year with a weighted average maturity of 228 days. U.S. Treasuries 1.17% U.S.Agencies- Federal, State and Local 19.40% Money Market 54.37% ABS/MBS 0.14% Corporate Notes 4.65% Outside Contractors-LAIF 6.50% Outside Contractors-Other 6.05% Cash 7.71% PORTFOLIO BREAKDOWN BY INVESTMENT 80.37% 9.23% 8.50% 1.76% 0.13% $0 $500,000,000 $1,000,000,000 $1,500,000,000 $2,000,000,000 $2,500,000,000 $3,000,000,000 1 yr & less 1 to 2 yrs 2 to 3 yrs 3 to 4 yrs 4+ yrs MATURITY DISTRIBUTION AAA 0.46% AA+ 22.09% AA 11.99% AA‐ 1.44% A+ 0.96% A 0.73% A‐ 0.32% A‐1+ 9.86% A‐1 44.11% NR (CASH) 7.71% NR (Misc.) 0.31% BBB+ 0.02% PORTFOLIO CREDIT QUALITY 0.644% 0.696% 0.380% 0.817% 0.560% 0.350% 0.00% 0.10% 0.20% 0.30% 0.40% 0.50% 0.60% 0.70% 0.80% 0.90% Total Treasurer LAIF Wells CalTRUST Cash YIELD TO MATURITY BY PORTFOLIO Note: Total is  100% of the portfolio; Treasurer‐80%; LAIF‐6%; Wells Cap‐1%;  CalTRUST‐5%  and Cash‐8% 0.00% 0.10% 0.20% 0.30% 0.40% 0.50% 0.60% 0.70% 3/13 6/13 9/13 12/13 3/14 6/14 9/14 12/14 3/15 6/15 9/15 12/15 QUARTERLY WEIGHTED YIELD TO MATURITY YTM County&Agencies 40.99% School Dist. 39.99% Community College  Dist. 12.21% Voluntary  Participants 6.81% POOL BALANCE BY PARTICIPANTS Note: More than 44% of the School Dist. funds from the bond proceeds March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 558 Note:All data provided by BloombergMAJOR MARKET AND ECONOMIC DATAAS OF DECEMBER 31, 20150123456712/96 12/99 12/02 12/05 12/08 12/11 12/14PercentageTREASURY YIELDS AND FED TARGET RATEUS 2‐YR TREASURY YIELDUS 5‐YR TREASURY YIELDFEDERAL FUND TARGET RATE‐10‐8‐6‐4‐2024681012/31/1512/31/1212/31/0912/31/0612/31/0312/31/0012/31/97PercentageGROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCTGDP QoQ Change‐2‐10123456Dec‐15Dec‐13Dec‐11Dec‐09Dec‐07Dec‐05Dec‐03Dec‐01Dec‐99Dec‐97PercentageCONSUMER PRICE INDEX CPI YoY ChangeCore CPI YoY Change02468101214161820Dec‐96 Dec‐98 Dec‐00 Dec‐02 Dec‐04 Dec‐06 Dec‐08 Dec‐10 Dec‐12 Dec‐14PercentageEMPLOYMENT RELATED RATESUnemployment RateUnderemployment RateMarch 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes559 SECTION III APPENDIX A. INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO DETAIL - MANAGED BY TREASURER’S OFFICE March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 560 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 12/31/2015 Run: 01/11/2016 10:00:56 AMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 Page 1 of 6 Subtotal .986787 116,460,000.00 116,194,015.65 252,110.81 55,445.92 .919834 116,611,869.02 99.771609 -464,402.23 Inv Type: 29 FHLMC NOTES Subtotal .240000 249,000.00 248,811.18 441.56 0.00 .240573 248,407.38 99.924169 -37.76 Inv Type: 28 FHLMC DISCOUNT NOTES .993017 172,504,526.55 99.801071 -301,405.67 Subtotal .972891 172,566,000.00 172,222,715.73 288,870.27 27,639.50 Inv Type: 27 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS Subtotal 1.616771 1,005,000.00 1,015,046.90 1,354.06 0.00 1.184831 1,015,046.90 100.999692 0.00 Inv Type: 26 AGENCY ABS FXD-M 30/360 Subtotal 1.178540 92,231,000.00 92,486,233.63 245,992.38 126,531.29 .952126 92,871,995.46 100.276733 -512,199.79 Inv Type: 23 FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSO Subtotal 1.027898 234,005,000.00 233,769,618.60 366,300.75 75,160.82 .893674 234,692,698.75 99.899412 -990,046.52 Inv Type: 22 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS Subtotal 1.075011 37,620,000.00 37,498,251.55 91,938.20 5,223.23 1.014707 37,709,584.04 99.676373 -197,133.94 Inv Type: 12 TREASURY NOTES Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 561 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 12/31/2015 Run: 01/11/2016 10:00:56 AMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 Page 2 of 6 Subtotal .531248 955,477,000.00 953,986,318.53 498,278.19 320,684.00 .532704 953,197,334.12 99.843986 -29,977.78 Inv Type: 71 COMMERCIAL PAPER DISCOUNT Subtotal 1.020000 600,000.00 599,179.69 2,193.00 0.00 1.083588 599,179.69 99.863282 0.00 Inv Type: 53 CREDIT ABS FXD-SA 30/360 Subtotal 1.066860 2,957,799.15 2,957,529.25 1,354.33 0.00 1.071196 2,957,529.25 99.990875 0.00 Inv Type: 50 AUTO ABS FXD-M 30/360 Subtotal .290000 997,000.00 996,837.99 2,610.21 151.21 .290853 994,076.57 99.983750 0.00 Inv Type: 43 FHLB DISCOUNT NOTES Subtotal .472739 1,470,000.00 1,463,309.26 1,754.70 0.00 .475034 1,463,053.75 99.544848 -1,499.19 Inv Type: 42 FARM CREDIT DISCOUNT NOTES Subtotal .400000 295,000.00 293,917.35 367.11 0.00 .401514 293,888.83 99.633000 -338.59 Inv Type: 41 FNMA DISCOUNT NOTES Subtotal 2.493165 5,555,000.00 5,784,587.02 48,809.80 0.00 1.286599 5,784,587.02 104.132980 0.00 Inv Type: 31 MUNICIPAL BONDS Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 562 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 12/31/2015 Run: 01/11/2016 10:00:56 AMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 Page 3 of 6 Subtotal .000000 565,318.32 565,318.32 0.00 0.00 .000000 565,318.32 100.000000 0.00 Inv Type: 99 MONEY MARKET ACCOUNTS Subtotal .906028 3,515,000.00 3,515,000.00 3,707.48 0.00 .906028 3,515,000.00 100.000000 0.00 Inv Type: 80 YCD / NCD QTR FLTR Subtotal 1.265482 8,600,000.00 8,596,780.00 23,211.69 0.00 1.278261 8,596,780.00 99.962558 0.00 Inv Type: 79 YCD/NCD 30/360 1.271249 139,569,166.02 100.122095 -591,373.48 Subtotal 1.519862 138,957,000.00 139,126,659.26 602,098.88 193,048.14 Inv Type: 75 CORPORATE NOTES Subtotal .951786 4,200,000.00 4,189,290.00 8,987.92 0.00 .951786 4,200,000.00 99.745000 -10,710.00 Inv Type: 74 CERT OF DEPOSIT MEDIUM TERM Subtotal .515733 10,500,000.00 10,499,780.00 12,753.67 47,550.00 2.298200 10,452,450.00 99.997905 -220.00 Inv Type: 73 CORP NOTE FLTG RT ACT- 360 Subtotal .551735 782,883,000.00 783,501,285.63 472,624.34 618,285.63 .551735 782,883,000.00 100.078975 0.00 Inv Type: 72 NEGOTIABLE CERT OF DEPOSIT Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 563 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 12/31/2015 Run: 01/11/2016 10:00:56 AMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 Page 4 of 6 .600000 3,335.77 100.000000 0.00 Subtotal .600000 3,335.77 3,335.77 32.63 0.00 Inv Type: 1000 TD WITH CALC CODE OF CSC-00 Grand Total Count 393 .727041 2,570,711,453.24 2,569,513,821.31 2,925,791.98 1,469,719.74 .695505 2,570,728,827.44 99.953412 -3,099,344.95 Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 564 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 12/31/2015 Run: 01/11/2016 10:00:56 AMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 Page 5 of 6 Money Market Accounts 565.32 565.32 565.32 100.00 %0.00 0.00 % TIME DEPOSIT 3.34 3.34 3.34 100.00 %0.00 0.60 % MBS/ABS 4,562.80 4,571.76 4,571.76 100.00 %0.00 1.10 % CORPORATE NOTES 149,457.00 150,021.62 149,626.44 99.74 %-351.00 1.34 % NCD/YCD 799,198.00 799,194.78 799,802.36 100.08 %607.58 0.56 % COMMERCIAL PAPER 955,477.00 953,197.33 953,986.32 100.08 %290.71 0.53 % MUNICIPALS 5,555.00 5,784.59 5,784.59 100.00 %0.00 1.29 % U.S. AGENCIES 618,273.00 619,680.52 617,675.46 99.68 % -1,985.00 0.93 % U.S. TREASURIES 37,620.00 37,709.58 37,498.25 99.44 %-191.91 1.01 % Totals(000's)2,570,711.45 2,570,728.83 2,569,513.82 99.95 %-1,629.63 0.70 % Assets (000's)Current Par Current Book Market MKT/Book Un Gain/Loss Yield Asset Allocation March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 565 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 12/31/2015 Run: 01/11/2016 10:00:56 AMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 Page 6 of 6 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 566 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 12/31/2015 Run: 01/11/2016 09:57:34 AMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 Page 1 07/31/2018 1.111402 976,449.50 102.609000 SUNGARD -6,794.45 82597 CCCSIG GOV US TREAS 912828QY9 07/06/2015 2.250000 945,000.00 969,655.05 8,897.89 0.00 05/15/2020 1.503393 262,828.13 107.508000 SUNGARD -4,808.93 82679 CCCCD GOV US TREASU 912828VJ6 09/03/2015 1.875000 195,000.00 196,363.05 10.04 0.00 04/15/2018 .921899 3,982,031.25 99.031000 SUNGARD -20,791.25 82670 CCCSIG GOV US TREAS 912828K25 08/21/2015 .750000 4,000,000.00 3,961,240.00 6,393.44 0.00 04/30/2019 1.138894 5,021,875.00 99.363000 SUNGARD -53,725.00 82512 RM GOV US TREASURY 912828ST8 04/15/2015 1.250000 5,000,000.00 4,968,150.00 10,645.60 0.00 82577 CCCCD GOV US TREAS 912828ND8 05/29/2015 3.500000 240,000.00 258,019.20 1,084.62 0.00 03/31/2018 .874966 513,232.55 99.105000 SUNGARD -2,841.80 82544 CCCSIG GOV US TREAS 912828UU2 04/30/2015 .750000 515,000.00 510,390.75 981.46 0.00 82710 CCCCD GOV US TREASU 912828UU2 09/29/2015 .750000 1,700,000.00 1,684,785.00 3,239.74 0.00 06/30/2020 1.499897 198,389.65 100.699000 SUNGARD -2,026.60 82136 CCCCD GOV US TREAS 912828C65 10/06/2014 1.625000 70,000.00 70,437.50 289.03 343.30 07/31/2018 1.446611 269,476.18 100.383000 SUNGARD 0.00 03/31/2019 1.589638 70,094.20 100.625000 SUNGARD 0.00 05/15/2019 1.503637 101,724.22 105.496000 SUNGARD -1,503.02 82181 CCCCD GOV US TREASU 912828KQ2 11/03/2014 3.125000 95,000.00 100,221.20 383.33 0.00 82056 CCCCD GOV US TREAS 912828VQ0 07/31/2014 1.375000 270,000.00 271,034.10 1,553.61 1,557.92 81994 CCCCD GOV US TREASU 912828PK0 05/09/2014 2.250000 140,000.00 143,095.40 275.41 57.17 03/31/2017 .622165 1,437,700.61 100.156000 SUNGARD -5,469.81 11/30/2017 1.165963 143,038.23 102.211000 SUNGARD 0.00 05/31/2017 .818703 363,574.72 99.559000 SUNGARD -184.37 82003 CCCSIG GOV US TREAS 912828SY7 06/05/2014 .625000 365,000.00 363,390.35 199.45 0.00 03/31/2018 1.076208 3,465,410.16 99.105000 SUNGARD 0.00 82403 CCCSIG GOV US TREAS 912828UU2 02/27/2015 .750000 3,500,000.00 3,468,675.00 6,670.08 3,264.84 82460 CCCSIG GOV US TREAS 912828F39 03/27/2015 1.750000 360,000.00 362,433.60 1,600.82 0.00 82461 CCCSIG GOV US TREAS 912828SM3 03/27/2015 1.000000 1,430,000.00 1,432,230.80 3,633.61 0.00 09/30/2019 1.403864 365,428.13 100.676000 SUNGARD -2,994.53 02/28/2019 1.336788 125,185.55 99.934000 SUNGARD -268.05 06/30/2017 .788660 2,857,580.43 99.688000 SUNGARD -6,503.63 82182 CCCSIG GOV US TREAS 912828TB6 11/03/2014 .750000 2,860,000.00 2,851,076.80 58.93 0.00 82377 CCCCD GOV US TREASU 912828VQ0 02/04/2015 1.375000 85,000.00 85,325.55 489.09 0.00 82402 CCCCD GOV US TREASU 912828SH4 02/27/2015 1.375000 125,000.00 124,917.50 580.79 0.00 07/31/2018 .916641 86,195.31 100.383000 SUNGARD -869.76 Inv Type: 12 TREASURY NOTES Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 567 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 12/31/2015 Run: 01/11/2016 09:57:34 AMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 Page 2 06/10/2016 .745089 2,993,104.40 100.645000 SUNGARD -134,786.40 80662 RM GOV FHLB NOTES 313373SZ6 06/20/2012 2.125000 2,840,000.00 2,858,318.00 3,520.42 0.00 09/08/2017 .790076 169,671.90 99.362000 SUNGARD -756.50 80907 WT GOV FHLB NOTES 313380EC7 10/10/2012 .750000 170,000.00 168,915.40 400.22 0.00 06/10/2016 .760030 1,996,647.80 100.645000 SUNGARD -89,425.05 80648 RM GOV FHLB NOTES 313373SZ6 06/11/2012 2.125000 1,895,000.00 1,907,222.75 2,349.01 0.00 82053 RM GOV FHLB NOTES 313379DT3 07/28/2014 1.250000 3,000,000.00 2,997,630.00 2,395.83 15,630.00 06/08/2018 1.390090 6,172,113.50 99.921000 SUNGARD 0.00 82122 GOV FHLB NOTES 3130A33J1 09/19/2014 1.200000 5,000,000.00 5,013,150.00 17,000.00 13,150.00 06/08/2018 1.410094 2,982,000.00 99.921000 SUNGARD 0.00 82038 RM GOV FHLB NOTES 313379DT3 07/15/2014 1.250000 6,205,000.00 6,200,098.05 4,955.38 27,984.55 06/19/2017 .850065 2,888,800.00 100.057000 SUNGARD -12,161.25 82000 RM GOV FHLB NOTES 313379VE6 06/02/2014 1.010000 2,875,000.00 2,876,638.75 967.92 0.00 06/10/2016 .475000 2,495,049.83 99.939000 SUNGARD 0.00 82012 RM GOV FEDERAL HOME 3130A2C61 06/13/2014 .375000 2,500,000.00 2,498,475.00 546.87 3,425.17 Inv Type: 22 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 82754 CCCSIG GOV US TREAS 912828RH5 10/14/2015 1.375000 3,920,000.00 3,932,269.60 13,695.90 0.00 09/30/2018 .940653 3,971,674.25 100.313000 SUNGARD -37,342.90 82755 CCCCD GOV US TREASU 912828F39 10/14/2015 1.750000 185,000.00 186,250.60 822.64 0.00 03/31/2017 .545225 1,691,418.75 100.156000 SUNGARD -8,797.95 03/31/2018 1.148216 1,365,425.37 99.105000 SUNGARD -167.58 03/31/2018 .860670 1,695,351.56 99.105000 SUNGARD -10,566.56 82711 CCCCD GOV US TREASU 912828SM3 09/29/2015 1.000000 1,680,000.00 1,682,620.80 4,268.85 0.00 09/30/2019 1.230157 188,831.07 100.676000 SUNGARD -2,456.63 82820 CCCCD GOV US TREASU 912828VF4 12/04/2015 1.375000 195,000.00 192,197.85 234.42 0.00 09/15/2018 1.151627 6,237,857.35 99.289000 SUNGARD -18,558.59 82877 CCCSIG GOV US TREAS 912828UU2 12/30/2015 .750000 1,375,000.00 1,362,693.75 2,620.39 0.00 05/31/2020 1.560386 193,467.78 98.563000 SUNGARD -1,240.63 82819 CCCSIG GOV US TREAS 912828L40 12/04/2015 1.000000 6,250,000.00 6,205,562.50 18,543.95 0.00 02/29/2020 1.550966 118,788.46 98.363000 SUNGARD -464.40 82786 CCCCD GOV US TREAS 912828UQ1 11/09/2015 1.250000 120,000.00 118,035.60 506.87 0.00 10/31/2018 1.148190 2,006,555.63 99.859000 SUNGARD -8,757.50 82789 CCCSIG GOV US TREAS 912828WD8 11/09/2015 1.250000 2,000,000.00 1,997,180.00 4,258.24 0.00 Subtotal 1.075011 37,620,000.00 37,498,251.55 91,938.20 5,223.23 1.014707 37,709,584.04 99.676373 -197,133.94 Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 568 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 12/31/2015 Run: 01/11/2016 09:57:34 AMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 Page 3 82408 GOV FHLB NOTES 3130A4GJ5 03/04/2015 1.125000 10,000,000.00 9,973,900.00 20,625.00 0.00 03/08/2019 1.415035 5,016,600.00 99.935000 SUNGARD -19,850.00 04/25/2018 1.155323 9,990,700.00 99.739000 SUNGARD -16,800.00 03/06/2017 .802655 9,983,700.00 99.783000 SUNGARD -5,400.00 82419 GOV FHLB NOTES 3130A4K27 03/09/2015 .720000 10,000,000.00 9,978,300.00 23,000.00 0.00 82400 RM GOV FHLB NOTES 3133782M2 02/25/2015 1.500000 5,000,000.00 4,996,750.00 23,541.67 0.00 82321 CCCCD GOV FHLB NOTE 3130A2T97 01/21/2015 .500000 11,470,000.00 11,449,812.80 14,815.42 0.00 09/28/2016 .470153 11,475,735.00 99.824000 SUNGARD -25,922.20 12/09/2016 .571735 19,654,717.50 100.740000 SUNGARD -237,082.50 82322 CCCCD GOV FHLB NOTE 313371PV2 01/21/2015 1.625000 19,275,000.00 19,417,635.00 19,141.17 0.00 03/24/2017 .840000 1,600,000.00 99.853000 SUNGARD -2,352.00 03/10/2017 .739127 3,008,010.00 99.929000 SUNGARD -10,140.00 82437 RM GOV FHLB NOTES 3133782N0 03/16/2015 .875000 3,000,000.00 2,997,870.00 8,093.75 0.00 82438 RM GOV FHLB NOTES 313382K85 03/16/2015 .450000 1,995,000.00 1,995,179.55 2,568.57 0.00 82450 CCCSIG GOV FHLB 3130A4QV7 03/24/2015 .840000 1,600,000.00 1,597,648.00 3,621.33 0.00 03/18/2016 .330364 1,997,394.00 100.009000 SUNGARD -2,214.45 82255 GOV FHLB NOTES 3130A3PC2 12/12/2014 .650000 5,000,000.00 4,989,750.00 1,715.28 0.00 12/16/2016 .620043 2,493,725.00 99.771000 SUNGARD 0.00 12/12/2016 .720127 4,993,050.00 99.795000 SUNGARD -3,300.00 12/12/2016 .670252 3,502,065.00 99.909000 SUNGARD -5,250.00 82256 RM GOV FHLB NOTES 3130A3Q64 12/12/2014 .700000 3,500,000.00 3,496,815.00 1,293.06 0.00 09/19/2017 1.200000 5,000,000.00 100.263000 SUNGARD 0.00 09/28/2016 .470201 765,382.50 99.824000 SUNGARD -1,728.90 82187 GOV FHLB NOTES 3130A3CE2 11/05/2014 .625000 10,000,000.00 9,995,300.00 13,368.06 0.00 82189 RM GOV FHLB NOTES 3130A3EW0 11/07/2014 .500000 2,500,000.00 2,494,275.00 520.82 550.00 10/14/2016 .572077 10,010,200.00 99.953000 SUNGARD -14,900.00 82271 GOV FHLB NOTES 3130A3Q64 12/23/2014 .700000 5,000,000.00 4,995,450.00 1,847.22 2,300.00 01/06/2017 .750000 10,000,000.00 100.052000 SUNGARD 0.00 82281 GOV FHLB NOTES 3130A3UR3 01/06/2015 .750000 10,000,000.00 10,005,200.00 36,458.33 5,200.00 82315 CCCCD GOV FHLB NOTE 313371PV2 01/21/2015 1.625000 6,165,000.00 6,210,621.00 6,122.18 0.00 82316 CCCCD GOV FHLB NOTE 3130A2T97 01/21/2015 .500000 765,000.00 763,653.60 988.13 0.00 12/09/2016 .571735 6,286,450.50 100.740000 SUNGARD -75,829.50 82275 GOV FHLB NOTES 3130A3TA2 12/30/2014 1.000000 10,000,000.00 9,998,700.00 37,777.78 0.00 12/12/2016 .770206 4,993,150.00 99.909000 SUNGARD 0.00 08/15/2017 1.000000 10,000,000.00 99.987000 SUNGARD -1,300.00 12/08/2017 1.180284 4,492,800.00 99.949000 SUNGARD 0.00 82280 RM GOV FHLB NOTES 3130A3HF4 12/29/2014 1.125000 4,500,000.00 4,497,705.00 3,234.39 4,905.00 Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 569 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 12/31/2015 Run: 01/11/2016 09:57:34 AMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 Page 4 08/14/2018 1.200000 10,000,000.00 99.644000 SUNGARD -35,600.00 82669 CCCSIG GOV FHLB 3130A5EP0 08/21/2015 .625000 1,000,000.00 995,320.00 538.19 0.00 05/30/2017 .692495 998,810.00 99.532000 SUNGARD -3,490.00 82664 GOV FHLB NOTES 3130A6B63 08/14/2015 1.200000 10,000,000.00 9,964,400.00 45,666.67 0.00 06/24/2016 .330927 250,105.00 99.875000 SUNGARD -417.50 82637 CCCSIG GOV FHLB 3130A62S5 07/24/2015 .750000 295,000.00 293,522.05 755.96 0.00 08/28/2017 .858202 294,439.27 99.499000 SUNGARD -917.22 82694 RM GOV FHLB NOTES 313380FB8 09/21/2015 1.375000 2,500,000.00 2,470,400.00 10,312.50 0.00 12/19/2017 1.035037 9,993,655.56 99.751000 SUNGARD -18,000.00 82875 GOV FHLB NOTES 3130A3HF4 12/30/2015 1.125000 10,000,000.00 9,994,900.00 7,187.50 0.00 12/08/2017 1.150014 10,002,075.00 99.949000 SUNGARD -300.00 82848 GOV FHLB NOTES 3130A6SW8 12/21/2015 1.000000 10,000,000.00 9,975,100.00 3,333.34 0.00 09/13/2019 1.400130 2,498,338.89 98.816000 SUNGARD -27,175.00 82781 GOV FHLB NOTES 3130A6RC3 11/04/2015 1.150000 5,000,000.00 4,968,150.00 9,104.17 0.00 11/02/2018 1.150000 5,000,000.00 99.363000 SUNGARD -31,850.00 82619 CLT GOV FHLB NOTES 3133834R9 07/10/2015 .375000 250,000.00 249,687.50 18.23 0.00 82552 GOV FHLB NOTES 3130A5DD8 05/07/2015 .720000 10,000,000.00 9,978,600.00 7,000.00 0.00 05/04/2018 1.050244 9,985,200.00 99.157000 SUNGARD -69,500.00 82561 CCCSIG GOV FHLB 3130A5EP0 05/15/2015 .625000 1,430,000.00 1,423,307.60 769.62 0.00 05/26/2017 .720000 10,000,000.00 99.786000 SUNGARD -21,400.00 82550 GOV FHLB NOTES 3130A57K9 05/04/2015 1.000000 10,000,000.00 9,915,700.00 15,833.33 0.00 03/24/2017 .840000 165,000.00 99.853000 SUNGARD -242.55 82451 CCCCD GOV FHLB 3130A4QV7 03/24/2015 .840000 165,000.00 164,757.45 373.45 0.00 04/20/2016 .300251 1,609,195.00 99.951000 SUNGARD 0.00 82503 PW GOV FHLB NOTES 3130A4ZY1 04/21/2015 .250000 1,610,000.00 1,609,211.10 793.82 16.10 06/29/2018 1.100000 10,000,000.00 99.488000 SUNGARD -51,200.00 82583 GOV FHLB NOTES 3130A5NC9 06/11/2015 1.300000 5,000,000.00 4,968,350.00 11,013.91 0.00 10/30/2018 1.300000 5,000,000.00 99.367000 SUNGARD -31,650.00 82590 GOV FHLB NOTES 3130A5JD2 06/29/2015 1.100000 10,000,000.00 9,948,800.00 611.11 0.00 06/14/2019 1.563094 2,506,000.00 100.320000 SUNGARD 0.00 82579 GOV FHLB NOTES 3130A5HF9 06/01/2015 .730000 10,000,000.00 9,966,400.00 202.74 0.00 05/30/2017 .666017 1,428,813.10 99.532000 SUNGARD -5,505.50 82582 RM GOV FHLB NOTES 313379EE5 06/08/2015 1.625000 2,500,000.00 2,508,000.00 1,918.40 2,000.00 06/30/2017 .730000 10,000,000.00 99.664000 SUNGARD -33,600.00 Subtotal 1.027898 234,005,000.00 233,769,618.60 366,300.75 75,160.82 .893674 234,692,698.75 99.899412 -990,046.52 Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 570 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 12/31/2015 Run: 01/11/2016 09:57:34 AMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 Page 5 81999 MDUSD GOV FNMA NOTE 3135G0ZB2 05/21/2014 .750000 49,000.00 48,860.84 72.48 0.00 08/28/2017 1.054521 9,940,800.00 99.659000 SUNGARD 0.00 04/20/2017 .740235 49,013.72 99.716000 SUNGARD -152.88 11/27/2018 1.489435 115,672.75 100.728000 SUNGARD 0.00 82005 CCCCD GOV FNMA 3135G0YT4 06/05/2014 1.625000 115,000.00 115,837.20 176.49 164.45 02/19/2019 1.795148 378,398.67 101.342000 SUNGARD 0.00 81890 AUHSD GOV FNMA NOTE 3135G0ZA4 04/01/2014 1.875000 6,959,000.00 7,052,389.78 47,843.15 67,571.89 81941 GOV FNMA NOTE 3135G0MZ3 04/17/2014 .875000 10,000,000.00 9,965,900.00 29,895.83 25,100.00 02/19/2019 1.795148 6,984,817.89 101.342000 SUNGARD 0.00 82087 CCCCD GOV FNMA NOTE 3135G0ZL0 08/25/2014 1.000000 130,000.00 129,707.50 339.44 171.60 82156 CCCCD GOV FNMA 3135G0YT4 10/23/2014 1.625000 125,000.00 125,910.00 191.85 0.00 82114 CCCSIG GOV FNMA NOT 3135G0JA2 09/08/2014 1.125000 555,000.00 555,915.75 1,109.99 0.00 09/27/2017 1.117972 129,535.90 99.775000 SUNGARD 0.00 04/27/2017 .895628 558,307.80 100.165000 SUNGARD -2,392.05 09/12/2019 1.889799 164,897.76 100.528000 SUNGARD 0.00 82119 WT GOV FNMA NOTES 3135G0ZG1 09/12/2014 1.750000 166,000.00 166,876.48 879.57 1,978.72 09/28/2016 .615791 4,821,797.78 100.362000 SUNGARD -101,772.92 80833 RM GOV FNMA NOTES 3135G0CM3 09/14/2012 1.250000 4,703,000.00 4,720,024.86 15,186.77 0.00 02/08/2018 .970000 164,242.02 99.344000 SUNGARD -324.42 81230 WT GOV FNMA NOTES 3135G0TG8 02/21/2013 .875000 165,000.00 163,917.60 573.49 0.00 03/15/2016 1.000170 4,239,211.35 100.357000 SUNGARD -189,806.40 80020 WT GOV FNMA NOTES 3135G0CM3 11/09/2011 1.250000 173,000.00 173,626.26 558.65 0.00 81889 AUHSD GOV FNMA NOTE 3135G0ZA4 04/01/2014 1.875000 377,000.00 382,059.34 2,591.88 3,660.67 80281 RM GOV FNMA NOTES 3135G0AL7 01/23/2012 2.250000 4,035,000.00 4,049,404.95 26,731.88 0.00 09/28/2016 1.160000 173,736.98 100.362000 SUNGARD -110.72 81361 RM GOV FEDERAL NATL 3135G0JA2 04/15/2013 1.125000 3,900,000.00 3,906,435.00 7,800.01 0.00 06/12/2018 1.013910 4,997,950.00 100.101000 SUNGARD 0.00 81484 GOV FNMA CALLABLE M 3136G1MU0 06/12/2013 1.000000 5,000,000.00 5,005,050.00 2,638.89 7,100.00 05/21/2018 1.459815 159,529.36 99.063000 SUNGARD 0.00 81538 WT GOV FNMA NOTES 3135G0WJ8 07/17/2013 .875000 164,000.00 162,463.32 159.44 2,933.96 05/21/2018 1.190082 196,976.00 99.063000 SUNGARD 0.00 81449 GOV FNMA CALLABLE M 3136G1M63 05/22/2013 .750000 10,000,000.00 10,001,300.00 8,125.00 1,300.00 04/27/2017 .600233 3,981,432.00 100.165000 SUNGARD -74,997.00 81478 AUHSD GOV FNMA NOTE 3135G0WJ8 06/07/2013 .875000 200,000.00 198,126.00 194.44 1,150.00 05/22/2018 .750000 10,000,000.00 100.013000 SUNGARD 0.00 Inv Type: 23 FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSO Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 571 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 12/31/2015 Run: 01/11/2016 09:57:34 AMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 Page 6 04/01/2018 1.201381 388,848.61 100.999639 BOOK 0.00 82778 CCCCD ABS FNMA SRS 3136AQDQ0 10/30/2015 1.646000 115,000.00 116,151.60 157.74 0.00 82545 CCCSIG GOV FNMA-ACE 3136ANJY4 04/30/2015 1.550000 385,000.00 388,848.61 497.30 0.00 82344 CCCSIG GOV FNMA ACE 3136AMKW8 01/30/2015 1.626000 440,000.00 444,396.70 596.20 0.00 02/25/2018 1.293773 444,396.70 100.999250 BOOK 0.00 01/25/2019 1.572772 65,649.99 100.999985 BOOK 0.00 82814 CCCCD GOV FNMA SRS 3136AQSW1 11/30/2015 1.898080 65,000.00 65,649.99 102.82 0.00 09/25/2019 1.382287 116,151.60 101.001391 BOOK 0.00 Subtotal 1.616771 1,005,000.00 1,015,046.90 1,354.06 0.00 Inv Type: 26 AGENCY ABS FXD-M 30/360 82708 CCCCD GOV FNMA 3135G0ZL0 09/29/2015 1.000000 1,680,000.00 1,676,220.00 4,386.66 0.00 12/20/2017 .793128 1,703,060.00 99.520000 SUNGARD -11,220.00 09/27/2017 .723255 1,689,282.93 99.775000 SUNGARD -12,969.60 06/12/2017 .642309 1,674,015.50 106.208000 SUNGARD -27,791.50 82709 CCCCD GOV FNMA 31398ADM1 09/29/2015 5.375000 1,550,000.00 1,646,224.00 4,397.05 0.00 82707 CCCCD GOV FNMA 3135G0RT2 09/29/2015 .875000 1,700,000.00 1,691,840.00 454.52 0.00 07/05/2016 .397750 5,633,140.45 99.879000 SUNGARD -4,958.80 82314 CCCCD GOV FNMA 3135G0XP3 01/21/2015 .375000 5,635,000.00 5,628,181.65 10,330.83 0.00 07/05/2016 .397750 12,435,894.80 99.879000 SUNGARD -10,947.20 82320 CCCCD GOV FNMA 3135G0XP3 01/21/2015 .375000 12,440,000.00 12,424,947.60 22,806.67 0.00 11/27/2018 1.380107 6,066,494.00 100.728000 SUNGARD -12,741.20 82236 CCCCD GOV FNMA BENC 3135G0ZY2 12/03/2014 1.750000 100,000.00 100,513.00 170.14 0.00 11/27/2018 1.385424 126,187.50 100.728000 SUNGARD -277.50 82257 RM GOV FNMA NOTES 3135G0YT4 12/12/2014 1.625000 6,010,000.00 6,053,752.80 9,223.69 0.00 11/26/2019 1.612998 100,653.00 100.513000 SUNGARD -140.00 82381 RM GOV FNMA NOTES 3136FTS67 02/09/2015 1.700000 6,000,000.00 6,026,820.00 35,133.33 0.00 05/25/2018 1.250000 10,000,000.00 100.154000 SUNGARD 0.00 82570 GOV FNMA NOTES CALL 3136G2K71 05/27/2015 1.250000 10,000,000.00 10,015,400.00 12,499.96 15,400.00 10/19/2018 1.177919 129,789.40 99.362000 SUNGARD -618.80 82678 CCCCD GOV FNMA BENC 3135G0E58 09/01/2015 1.125000 130,000.00 129,170.60 292.50 0.00 01/21/2020 1.627650 169,977.90 99.623000 SUNGARD -618.80 02/27/2019 1.329281 6,087,180.00 100.447000 SUNGARD -60,360.00 82436 WT GOV FNMA NOTES 3135G0A78 03/16/2015 1.625000 170,000.00 169,359.10 1,227.78 0.00 Subtotal 1.178540 92,231,000.00 92,486,233.63 245,992.38 126,531.29 .952126 92,871,995.46 100.276733 -512,199.79 Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 572 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 12/31/2015 Run: 01/11/2016 09:57:34 AMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 Page 7 82323 CCCCD GOV FFCB AGEN 3133EEKM1 01/21/2015 .300000 10,160,000.00 10,163,657.60 8,466.67 4,632.96 03/21/2016 .308272 3,039,708.16 100.036000 SUNGARD 0.00 03/21/2016 .308272 10,159,024.64 100.036000 SUNGARD 0.00 01/22/2018 1.096935 9,971,900.00 99.746000 SUNGARD 0.00 82380 GOV FFCB NOTES 3133EEKB5 02/09/2015 1.000000 10,000,000.00 9,974,600.00 44,166.67 2,700.00 12/01/2016 .590074 4,999,000.00 99.932000 SUNGARD -2,400.00 82218 GOV FFCB NOTES 3133EEDQ0 12/01/2014 .580000 5,000,000.00 4,996,600.00 2,416.67 0.00 82259 GOV FFCB NOTES 3133EEFA3 12/15/2014 .720000 10,000,000.00 9,989,200.00 3,200.00 0.00 82318 CCCCD GOV FFCB AGEN 3133EEKM1 01/21/2015 .300000 3,040,000.00 3,041,094.40 2,533.33 1,386.24 12/15/2016 .720000 10,000,000.00 99.892000 SUNGARD -10,800.00 82382 RM GOV FFCB NOTES 3133EELZ1 02/09/2015 1.000000 5,000,000.00 4,973,950.00 12,777.76 0.00 82472 GOV FFCB NOTES 3133EEWH9 04/02/2015 1.000000 10,000,000.00 9,973,400.00 24,722.22 0.00 03/29/2018 1.130145 4,980,000.00 99.479000 SUNGARD -6,050.00 04/02/2018 1.000000 10,000,000.00 99.734000 SUNGARD -26,600.00 82671 RM GOV FFCB NOTES 3133EE5S5 08/25/2015 1.500000 1,000,000.00 991,420.00 6,083.33 0.00 07/12/2016 .600206 2,498,863.30 100.053000 SUNGARD -3,541.48 80718 RM GOV FFCB NOTES 3133EAXG8 07/23/2012 .650000 2,494,000.00 2,495,321.82 7,610.16 0.00 05/17/2017 .790074 198,914.00 99.472000 SUNGARD 0.00 81479 AUHSD GOV FFCB NOTE 3133ECPT5 06/07/2013 .650000 200,000.00 198,944.00 158.89 30.00 03/28/2016 .790000 3,996,818.30 100.153000 SUNGARD -33,764.09 80522 RM GOV FFCB NOTES 3133EAJU3 04/13/2012 1.050000 4,040,000.00 4,046,181.20 10,958.50 0.00 11/14/2016 .600000 10,000,000.00 99.756000 SUNGARD -24,400.00 80543 RM GOV FFCB NOTES 3133EAJU3 04/20/2012 1.050000 3,957,000.00 3,963,054.21 10,733.37 0.00 03/28/2016 .810254 4,077,652.80 100.153000 SUNGARD -31,471.60 82185 RM GOV FFCB NOTES 3133EDYB2 11/04/2014 1.500000 2,000,000.00 1,990,920.00 13,750.00 620.00 10/10/2017 1.156802 9,998,000.00 100.061000 SUNGARD 0.00 82195 GOV FFCB NOTES 3133EEBU3 11/18/2014 .600000 10,000,000.00 9,975,600.00 7,833.33 0.00 01/16/2019 1.620035 1,990,300.00 99.546000 SUNGARD 0.00 82137 GOV FFCB NOTES 3133EDXA5 10/10/2014 1.150000 10,000,000.00 10,006,100.00 25,875.00 8,100.00 12/07/2016 .972048 2,497,134.30 100.092000 SUNGARD 0.00 81579 RM GOV FFCB NOTES 3133ECWV2 08/20/2013 .875000 2,505,000.00 2,507,304.60 1,461.24 10,170.30 11/01/2016 .700000 5,000,000.00 99.802000 SUNGARD -9,900.00 81958 GOV FEDERAL FARM CR 3133EDKJ0 05/01/2014 .700000 5,000,000.00 4,990,100.00 5,833.33 0.00 Inv Type: 27 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS 1.184831 1,015,046.90 100.999692 0.00 Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 573 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 12/31/2015 Run: 01/11/2016 09:57:34 AMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 Page 8 03/08/2017 1.120062 169,012.30 100.083000 SUNGARD 0.00 80411 WT GOV FHLMC NOT 3137EADC0 03/12/2012 1.000000 170,000.00 170,141.10 533.61 1,128.80 79343 WT GOV FHLMC NOTES 3134A4ZT4 02/25/2011 4.750000 155,000.00 155,289.85 3,313.13 0.00 01/19/2016 2.330564 172,267.00 100.187000 SUNGARD -16,977.15 Inv Type: 29 FHLMC NOTES 04/01/2016 .240573 248,407.38 99.924167 SUNGARD -37.76 82483 RM GOV FHLMC DISC N 313396VA8 04/10/2015 .240000 249,000.00 248,811.18 441.56 0.00 .240573 248,407.38 99.924169 -37.76 Subtotal .240000 249,000.00 248,811.18 441.56 0.00 Inv Type: 28 FHLMC DISCOUNT NOTES 12/14/2018 1.415191 19,935,688.89 99.633000 SUNGARD -6,200.00 82847 GOV FFCB NOTES 3133EFSH1 12/18/2015 1.170000 10,000,000.00 9,956,900.00 5,525.00 0.00 06/14/2018 1.255129 9,980,500.00 99.569000 SUNGARD -22,300.00 82846 GOV FFCB NOTES 3133EFSJ7 12/18/2015 1.300000 20,000,000.00 19,926,600.00 12,277.78 0.00 09/14/2017 .810304 4,997,000.00 99.601000 SUNGARD -16,950.00 82691 GOV FFCB NOTES 3133EFCY1 09/14/2015 .780000 5,000,000.00 4,980,050.00 11,591.67 0.00 09/14/2017 .860067 4,992,316.67 99.601000 SUNGARD -12,050.00 82692 GOV FFCB NOTES 3133EFCY1 09/16/2015 .780000 5,000,000.00 4,980,050.00 11,591.67 0.00 08/04/2020 1.730194 170,462.16 99.387000 SUNGARD -1,198.50 82672 RM GOV FFCB NOTES 3133EE5S5 08/25/2015 1.500000 3,000,000.00 2,974,260.00 18,250.00 0.00 08/05/2019 1.350014 1,006,573.33 99.142000 SUNGARD -14,320.00 82683 WT GOV FFCB NOTES 3133EE5Z9 09/11/2015 1.750000 170,000.00 168,957.90 1,214.79 0.00 08/05/2019 1.350014 3,019,720.00 99.142000 SUNGARD -42,960.00 82785 GOV FFCB NOTES 3133EFNF0 11/06/2015 1.080000 5,000,000.00 4,996,450.00 8,250.00 0.00 12/03/2018 1.305115 9,998,500.00 99.985000 BOOK 0.00 82818 GOV FFCB NOTES 3133EFRQ2 12/03/2015 1.300000 10,000,000.00 9,998,500.00 10,111.11 0.00 12/03/2018 1.300000 10,000,000.00 100.000000 BOOK 0.00 82817 GOV FFCB NOTES 3133EFRQ2 12/03/2015 1.300000 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 10,111.11 0.00 11/06/2018 1.104126 4,996,450.00 99.929000 BOOK 0.00 82796 GOV FFCB NOTES 3133EFPH4 11/17/2015 .930000 10,000,000.00 9,963,500.00 11,366.67 0.00 11/17/2017 .930000 10,000,000.00 99.635000 SUNGARD -36,500.00 .993017 172,504,526.55 99.801071 -301,405.67 Subtotal .972891 172,566,000.00 172,222,715.73 288,870.27 27,639.50 Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 574 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 12/31/2015 Run: 01/11/2016 09:57:34 AMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 Page 9 82319 CCCCD GOV FHLMC 3137EADC0 01/21/2015 1.000000 9,485,000.00 9,492,872.55 29,772.36 0.00 03/08/2017 .643501 19,702,249.15 100.083000 SUNGARD -131,018.50 03/08/2017 .643501 9,556,422.05 100.083000 SUNGARD -63,549.50 03/08/2017 .672177 991,747.25 100.083000 SUNGARD -5,929.70 82343 CCCSIG GOV FHLMC 3137EADC0 01/29/2015 1.000000 985,000.00 985,817.55 3,091.81 0.00 82317 CCCCD GOV FREDDIE M 3137EADC0 01/21/2015 1.000000 19,555,000.00 19,571,230.65 61,380.97 0.00 82312 AUHSD GOV FHLMC NOT 3134G3ZW3 01/21/2015 1.200000 2,486,000.00 2,470,586.80 11,849.93 0.00 07/28/2017 1.002272 464,974.04 99.834000 SUNGARD -745.94 08/08/2018 1.200000 2,486,000.00 99.380000 SUNGARD -15,413.20 08/08/2018 1.200000 110,000.00 99.380000 SUNGARD -682.00 82313 AUHSD GOV FHLMC NOT 3134G3ZW3 01/21/2015 1.200000 110,000.00 109,318.00 524.33 0.00 07/28/2017 .853802 95,323.00 99.834000 SUNGARD -480.70 82446 CCCCD GOV FHLMC 3137EADJ5 03/20/2015 1.000000 95,000.00 94,842.30 403.75 0.00 82447 CCCSIG GOV FHLMC 3137EADJ5 03/20/2015 1.000000 4,305,000.00 4,297,853.70 18,296.25 0.00 82549 GOV FHLMC NOTES 3134G6YC1 05/01/2015 .670000 10,000,000.00 9,955,700.00 5,769.40 0.00 07/28/2017 .853802 4,319,637.00 99.834000 SUNGARD -21,783.30 03/07/2018 1.250049 6,958,474.28 99.298000 SUNGARD 0.00 81869 RM GOV FEDERAL HOME 3137EADP1 03/14/2014 .875000 7,061,000.00 7,011,431.78 19,564.87 52,957.50 81870 WT GOV FEDERAL HOME 3137EADP1 03/12/2014 .875000 157,000.00 155,897.86 435.02 1,359.62 82009 RM GOV FHLMC 3137EADH9 06/13/2014 1.000000 2,484,000.00 2,483,751.60 138.00 0.00 03/07/2018 1.279731 154,538.24 99.298000 SUNGARD 0.00 80900 CCCCD GOV FHLMC 3137EADL0 10/05/2012 1.000000 45,000.00 44,876.25 115.00 0.00 82081 CCCSIG GOV FHLMC 3137EADJ5 08/14/2014 1.000000 465,000.00 464,228.10 1,976.25 0.00 09/29/2017 .764157 45,263.53 99.725000 SUNGARD -387.28 03/08/2017 .780254 3,895,464.60 100.083000 SUNGARD -22,252.50 81847 RM GOV FHLMC NOTE3S 3137EADC0 02/25/2014 1.000000 3,870,000.00 3,873,212.10 12,147.50 0.00 06/29/2017 .945000 2,488,088.17 99.990000 SUNGARD -4,336.57 82078 GOV FHLMC NOTES 3137EADL0 08/11/2014 1.000000 5,000,000.00 4,986,250.00 12,777.78 0.00 07/28/2017 1.002272 39,997.77 99.834000 SUNGARD -64.17 09/29/2017 1.033085 4,994,900.00 99.725000 SUNGARD -8,650.00 07/28/2017 1.001893 809,954.64 99.834000 SUNGARD -1,299.24 82080 CCCSIG GOV FHLMC 3137EADJ5 08/14/2014 1.000000 810,000.00 808,655.40 3,442.50 0.00 09/29/2017 1.070130 9,977,700.00 99.725000 SUNGARD -5,200.00 82026 GOV FHLMC NOTES 3137EADL0 07/03/2014 1.000000 10,000,000.00 9,972,500.00 25,555.56 0.00 82076 CCCCD GOV FHLMC 3137EADJ5 08/14/2014 1.000000 75,000.00 74,875.50 318.75 0.00 82077 CCCCD GOV FHLMC 3137EADJ5 08/14/2014 1.000000 40,000.00 39,933.60 170.00 0.00 07/28/2017 1.001893 74,995.80 99.834000 SUNGARD -120.30 Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 575 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 12/31/2015 Run: 01/11/2016 09:57:34 AMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 Page 10 81508 AUHSD MUNI CHICAGO 167486JB6 06/27/2013 5.000000 170,000.00 189,542.34 4,250.00 0.00 05/15/2017 .966000 175,000.00 100.000000 BOOK 0.00 01/01/2017 1.618751 189,542.34 111.495494 BOOK 0.00 01/01/2017 2.592295 421,318.77 108.030454 BOOK 0.00 81509 AUHSD MUNI CHICAGO 167486JC4 06/27/2013 5.000000 390,000.00 421,318.77 9,750.00 0.00 08/01/2017 1.402000 440,000.00 100.000000 BOOK 0.00 80760 CCCCD MUNI PALO ALT 697379UA1 08/14/2012 1.402000 440,000.00 440,000.00 2,570.33 0.00 81277 CCCSIG MUNI UNIV OF 91412GPX7 03/14/2013 .659000 1,240,000.00 1,240,000.00 1,044.15 0.00 81278 CCCCD MUNI UNIV OF 91412GPY5 03/14/2013 .966000 175,000.00 175,000.00 216.01 0.00 05/15/2016 .659000 1,240,000.00 100.000000 BOOK 0.00 81510 AUHSD MUNI WASHINGT 93974B3K6 06/27/2013 5.000000 600,000.00 696,925.06 15,000.00 0.00 81512 AUHSD MUNI SOUTH BE 836496NW5 06/27/2013 5.000000 505,000.00 547,506.38 11,643.06 0.00 01/01/2018 1.301222 696,925.06 116.154177 BOOK 0.00 01/15/2016 1.616968 547,506.38 108.417105 BOOK 0.00 81514 AUHSD MUNI WICOMICO 967545R89 06/27/2013 3.500000 390,000.00 427,550.12 1,137.50 0.00 08/01/2016 6.525847 7,453.00 74.530000 BOOK 0.00 80198 AUHSD MUNI COMPTON 204712FD0 01/03/2012 .000000 10,000.00 7,453.00 0.00 0.00 Inv Type: 31 MUNICIPAL BONDS 82762 RM GOV FHLMC NOTES 3137EADM8 10/26/2015 1.250000 6,000,000.00 5,918,220.00 18,541.67 0.00 05/30/2019 1.480153 101,007.00 100.750000 SUNGARD -257.00 82807 GOV FHLMC NOTES 3134G3S50 11/23/2015 .625000 5,000,000.00 4,993,300.00 5,208.33 0.00 10/02/2019 1.310124 5,991,200.00 98.637000 SUNGARD -67,980.00 82571 RM GOV FHLMC NOTES 3137EADG1 05/27/2015 1.750000 3,000,000.00 3,022,500.00 4,520.83 0.00 05/30/2017 .710296 9,991,700.00 99.557000 SUNGARD -36,000.00 82635 CCCCD GOV FHLMC NOT 3137EADG1 07/22/2015 1.750000 100,000.00 100,750.00 150.69 0.00 05/30/2019 1.379985 3,043,140.00 100.750000 SUNGARD -20,640.00 12/15/2017 1.060007 9,989,261.11 99.733000 SUNGARD -14,850.00 82876 GOV FHLMC NOTES 3134G64W0 12/30/2015 .900000 5,007,000.00 4,993,380.96 1,001.41 0.00 06/23/2017 1.035077 4,997,962.37 99.728000 SUNGARD -3,705.18 82838 GOV FHLMC NOTES 3137EADX4 12/15/2015 1.000000 10,000,000.00 9,973,300.00 5,555.55 0.00 11/01/2016 .625000 5,001,909.72 99.866000 SUNGARD -6,700.00 82837 GOV FHLMC NOTES 3137EADX4 12/11/2015 1.000000 10,000,000.00 9,973,300.00 5,555.56 0.00 12/15/2017 1.057021 9,988,680.00 99.733000 SUNGARD -15,380.00 .919834 116,611,869.02 99.771609 -464,402.23 Subtotal .986787 116,460,000.00 116,194,015.65 252,110.81 55,445.92 Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 576 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 12/31/2015 Run: 01/11/2016 09:57:34 AMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 Page 11 02/09/2016 .290853 994,076.57 99.983750 SUNGARD 0.00 82383 RM GOV FHLB DISCOUN 313384SW0 02/10/2015 .290000 997,000.00 996,837.99 2,610.21 151.21 .290853 994,076.57 99.983750 0.00 Subtotal .290000 997,000.00 996,837.99 2,610.21 151.21 Inv Type: 43 FHLB DISCOUNT NOTES 11/18/2016 .603550 367,823.17 99.441000 SUNGARD -82.64 82813 RM GOV FFCB DISC 313312P95 12/01/2015 .600000 370,000.00 367,931.70 191.17 0.00 09/01/2016 .431873 1,095,230.58 99.579778 SUNGARD -1,416.55 82680 DCD GOV FFCB DISCOU 313312E30 09/04/2015 .430000 1,100,000.00 1,095,377.56 1,563.53 0.00 .475034 1,463,053.75 99.544848 -1,499.19 Subtotal .472739 1,470,000.00 1,463,309.26 1,754.70 0.00 Inv Type: 42 FARM CREDIT DISCOUNT NOTES 82684 RM GOV FNMA DISC 313588C29 09/11/2015 .400000 295,000.00 293,917.35 367.11 0.00 08/15/2016 .401514 293,888.83 99.633000 SUNGARD -338.59 .401514 293,888.83 99.633000 -338.59 Subtotal .400000 295,000.00 293,917.35 367.11 0.00 Inv Type: 41 FNMA DISCOUNT NOTES 81633 CCCCD MUNI UNIV OF 91412GSZ9 10/02/2013 2.054000 195,000.00 195,000.00 511.79 0.00 05/15/2018 2.054000 195,000.00 100.000000 BOOK 0.00 81693 CCCCD MUNI CA ST TA 13063CFD7 11/05/2013 1.250000 125,000.00 125,586.25 260.42 0.00 12/01/2018 1.638640 427,550.12 109.628236 BOOK 0.00 81632 CCCSIG MUNI UNIV OF 91412GSX4 10/02/2013 .907000 415,000.00 415,000.00 480.96 0.00 05/15/2016 .907000 415,000.00 100.000000 BOOK 0.00 11/01/2016 1.090101 125,586.25 100.469000 BOOK 0.00 82387 CCCSIG MUNI MS ST T 605581FX0 02/18/2015 1.090000 110,000.00 110,000.00 299.75 0.00 10/01/2017 1.090000 110,000.00 100.000000 BOOK 0.00 81694 CCCSIG MUNI CA ST T 13063CFD7 11/05/2013 1.250000 790,000.00 793,705.10 1,645.83 0.00 11/01/2016 1.090101 793,705.10 100.469000 BOOK 0.00 1.286599 5,784,587.02 104.132980 0.00 Subtotal 2.493165 5,555,000.00 5,784,587.02 48,809.80 0.00 Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 577 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 12/31/2015 Run: 01/11/2016 09:57:34 AMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 Page 12 82667 PW CP UBS FINANCE D 90262CBH9 08/24/2015 .540000 500,000.00 499,751.94 975.00 104.44 05/16/2016 .683473 1,989,837.78 99.807333 SUNGARD 0.00 82668 CP UBS FINANCE DE 90262CBH9 08/24/2015 .540000 500,000.00 499,751.94 975.00 104.44 02/17/2016 .541438 498,672.50 99.950389 SUNGARD 0.00 82666 CCCSIG CP JPM SECUR 46640PEG4 08/21/2015 .680000 2,000,000.00 1,996,146.67 5,024.44 1,284.45 02/05/2016 .360971 498,655.00 99.963056 SUNGARD -9.72 82557 PW CP TOYOTA MOTOR 89233GB54 05/12/2015 .360000 500,000.00 499,815.28 1,170.00 0.00 01/28/2016 .471076 24,942,881.94 99.971500 SUNGARD 0.00 82657 CP UBS FINANCIAL SE 90262CAU1 08/06/2015 .470000 25,000,000.00 24,992,875.00 48,305.56 1,687.50 02/17/2016 .541438 498,672.50 99.950389 SUNGARD 0.00 82677 PW CP UBS FINANCE D 90262CC13 09/01/2015 .550000 1,750,000.00 1,748,775.00 3,261.80 379.17 82695 CCCCD CP JPMSCC 46640PFH1 09/22/2015 .650000 3,950,000.00 3,940,599.00 7,203.26 2,580.65 03/01/2016 .551533 1,745,134.03 99.930000 SUNGARD 0.00 Inv Type: 71 COMMERCIAL PAPER DISCOUNT 02/22/2019 1.083588 599,179.69 99.863282 BOOK 0.00 82448 CCCSIG AB CITIBANK 17305EFN0 03/20/2015 1.020000 600,000.00 599,179.69 2,193.00 0.00 Subtotal 1.020000 600,000.00 599,179.69 2,193.00 0.00 1.083588 599,179.69 99.863282 0.00 Inv Type: 53 CREDIT ABS FXD-SA 30/360 07/17/2017 .710792 520,643.29 99.999051 BOOK 0.00 82502 CCCSIG ABS NAROT 20 65477UAC4 04/14/2015 1.050000 845,000.00 844,822.38 394.33 0.00 10/15/2019 1.059409 844,822.38 99.978980 BOOK 0.00 82341 CCCSIG CORP HONDA A 43814KAB7 01/28/2015 .700000 317,150.92 317,134.37 98.67 0.00 06/15/2017 .704310 317,134.37 99.994782 BOOK 0.00 82409 CCCSIG AB TOYOTA AU 89236WAB4 03/04/2015 .710000 520,648.23 520,643.29 164.30 0.00 82665 CCCSIG ABS HONDA 20 43814MAC1 08/19/2015 1.270000 455,000.00 454,994.40 208.67 0.00 04/18/2019 1.270662 454,994.40 99.998769 BOOK 0.00 82636 CCCSIG ABS NISSAN A 65475WAD0 07/22/2015 1.340000 820,000.00 819,934.81 488.36 0.00 03/16/2020 1.343408 819,934.81 99.992050 BOOK 0.00 1.071196 2,957,529.25 99.990875 0.00 Subtotal 1.066860 2,957,799.15 2,957,529.25 1,354.33 0.00 Inv Type: 50 AUTO ABS FXD-M 30/360 Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 578 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 12/31/2015 Run: 01/11/2016 09:57:34 AMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 Page 13 82769 PW CP TOYOTA MOTOR 89233GGS9 10/30/2015 .630000 500,000.00 498,160.00 551.25 0.00 07/26/2016 .632991 6,568,815.00 99.632000 SUNGARD -379.50 07/26/2016 .632991 497,637.50 99.632000 SUNGARD -28.75 07/26/2016 .632991 497,637.50 99.632000 SUNGARD -28.75 82770 PW CP TOYOTA MOTOR 89233GGS9 10/30/2015 .630000 500,000.00 498,160.00 551.25 0.00 82768 PW CP TOYOTA MOTOR 89233GGS9 10/30/2015 .630000 6,600,000.00 6,575,712.00 7,276.50 0.00 82766 CP BNP PARIBAS 09659BCV0 10/30/2015 .400000 30,000,000.00 29,969,200.00 21,000.00 0.00 03/29/2016 .400672 29,949,666.67 99.897333 SUNGARD -1,466.67 07/26/2016 .632991 497,637.50 99.632000 SUNGARD -28.75 82767 PW CP TOYOTA MOTOR 89233GGS9 10/30/2015 .630000 500,000.00 498,160.00 551.25 0.00 07/26/2016 .632991 248,818.75 99.632000 SUNGARD -14.38 07/26/2016 .632991 248,818.75 99.632000 SUNGARD -14.38 82771 PW CP TOYOTA MOTOR 89233GGS9 10/30/2015 .630000 250,000.00 249,080.00 275.63 0.00 82772 PW CP TOYOTA MOTOR 89233GGS9 10/30/2015 .630000 500,000.00 498,160.00 551.25 0.00 82773 PW CP TOYOTA MOTOR 89233GGS9 10/30/2015 .630000 250,000.00 249,080.00 275.63 0.00 07/26/2016 .632991 497,637.50 99.632000 SUNGARD -28.75 82699 CCCCD CP BK OF TOKY 06538BCM3 09/22/2015 .510000 1,995,000.00 1,993,138.00 2,854.51 399.00 06/17/2016 .653172 1,985,310.40 99.762000 SUNGARD 0.00 03/21/2016 .511311 1,989,884.49 99.906667 SUNGARD 0.00 01/04/2016 .275204 29,977,770.83 99.996833 SUNGARD -262.50 82704 CP SOCIETE GENERALE 83369BA48 09/29/2015 .275000 30,000,000.00 29,999,050.00 21,541.67 0.00 06/17/2016 .653172 3,930,815.09 99.762000 SUNGARD 0.00 03/11/2016 .320384 19,976,000.00 99.918333 SUNGARD -3,888.89 82696 CCCCD CP BK OF TOKY 06538BCM3 09/22/2015 .510000 3,950,000.00 3,946,313.33 5,651.79 790.00 82698 CCCCD CP JPMSCC 46640PFH1 09/22/2015 .650000 1,995,000.00 1,990,251.90 3,638.10 1,303.40 03/21/2016 .511311 3,939,871.54 99.906667 SUNGARD 0.00 82735 CP ABBEY NATIONAL 00280NBA7 10/07/2015 .340000 25,000,000.00 24,989,444.44 20,305.56 0.00 03/09/2016 .310353 24,971,583.33 99.920667 SUNGARD -5,194.44 82763 CP TOYOTA MOTOR CRE 89233GC95 10/29/2015 .310000 25,000,000.00 24,980,166.67 13,777.78 0.00 82764 CP BNP PARIBAS 09659BCR9 10/29/2015 .400000 25,000,000.00 24,975,500.00 17,777.78 0.00 82765 CP TOYOTA MOTOR CRE 89233GCB0 10/28/2015 .320000 20,000,000.00 19,983,666.67 11,555.56 0.00 03/25/2016 .400659 24,958,888.89 99.902000 SUNGARD -1,166.67 82758 CP SOCIETE GENERALE 83369BBR6 10/20/2015 .315000 25,000,000.00 24,985,486.11 15,968.75 0.00 02/10/2016 .340405 24,970,250.00 99.957778 SUNGARD -1,111.12 02/25/2016 .315353 24,972,000.00 99.941944 SUNGARD -2,482.64 02/01/2016 .210120 29,982,850.00 99.967278 SUNGARD -4,391.67 82761 CP NORDEA BANK 65558FB12 10/26/2015 .210000 30,000,000.00 29,990,183.33 11,725.00 0.00 Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 579 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 12/31/2015 Run: 01/11/2016 09:57:34 AMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 Page 14 82815 CP ABBEY NATIONAL 00280NDE7 12/02/2015 .460000 25,000,000.00 24,967,500.00 9,583.33 722.23 04/15/2016 .460836 24,954,638.89 99.868750 SUNGARD 0.00 04/14/2016 .460789 24,957,194.44 99.870000 SUNGARD 0.00 04/15/2016 .500939 24,953,125.00 99.868750 SUNGARD 0.00 82816 CP CREDIT SUISSE NY 2254EADF7 12/02/2015 .500000 25,000,000.00 24,967,187.50 10,416.67 3,645.83 82811 CP ABBEY NATIONAL 00280NDF4 11/25/2015 .460000 25,000,000.00 24,967,187.50 11,819.44 729.17 82809 CP STANDARD CHARTER 85324TDU7 11/30/2015 .590000 30,000,000.00 29,955,750.00 15,733.33 13,766.67 04/15/2016 .531165 24,945,159.75 99.868750 SUNGARD 0.00 04/28/2016 .591454 29,926,250.00 99.852500 SUNGARD 0.00 04/25/2016 .491016 24,948,277.78 99.856250 SUNGARD 0.00 82810 CP CREDIT AGRICOLE 22533TDR4 11/25/2015 .490000 25,000,000.00 24,964,062.50 12,590.28 3,194.44 04/27/2016 .521069 24,948,722.22 99.853750 SUNGARD 0.00 82823 CP CREDIT AGRICOLE 22533TDT0 12/07/2015 .520000 25,000,000.00 24,963,437.50 9,027.78 5,687.50 82824 CP STANDARD CHARTER 85324TEB8 12/07/2015 .640000 20,000,000.00 19,962,883.33 8,888.89 9,461.11 82825 CP CREDIT SUISSE NY 2254EAEA7 12/07/2015 .580000 25,000,000.00 24,953,958.33 10,069.45 6,319.44 05/11/2016 .641780 19,944,533.33 99.814417 SUNGARD 0.00 07/26/2016 .632991 248,818.75 99.632000 SUNGARD -14.38 82776 PW CP TOYOTA MOTOR 89233GGS9 10/30/2015 .630000 250,000.00 249,080.00 275.63 0.00 82777 PW CP TOYOTA MOTOR 89233GGS9 10/30/2015 .630000 250,000.00 249,080.00 275.63 0.00 82780 CP UBS FINANCE DE 90262CCU9 11/03/2015 .390000 25,000,000.00 24,974,625.00 15,979.17 0.00 07/26/2016 .632991 248,818.75 99.632000 SUNGARD -14.38 82774 PW CP TOYOTA MOTOR 89233GGS9 10/30/2015 .630000 150,000.00 149,448.00 165.38 0.00 82799 CP STANDARD CHARTER 85324TDF0 11/18/2015 .530000 25,000,000.00 24,967,187.50 16,194.44 5,833.31 07/26/2016 .632991 149,291.25 99.632000 SUNGARD -8.63 07/26/2016 .632991 248,818.75 99.632000 SUNGARD -14.38 82775 PW CP TOYOTA MOTOR 89233GGS9 10/30/2015 .630000 250,000.00 249,080.00 275.63 0.00 03/28/2016 .390618 24,960,458.33 99.898500 SUNGARD -1,812.50 82795 CP SOCIETE GENERALE 83369BDF0 11/16/2015 .390000 25,000,000.00 24,967,187.50 12,458.33 0.00 04/11/2016 .501044 19,958,333.33 99.873750 SUNGARD 0.00 04/15/2016 .390639 24,959,104.17 99.868750 SUNGARD -4,375.00 04/15/2016 .480962 24,950,000.00 99.868750 SUNGARD 0.00 82797 CP STANDARD CHARTER 85324TDF0 11/17/2015 .480000 25,000,000.00 24,967,187.50 15,000.00 2,187.50 05/09/2016 .521363 1,620,751.53 99.817250 SUNGARD 0.00 82790 PW CP TOYOTA MOTOR 89233GE93 11/10/2015 .520000 1,625,000.00 1,622,030.31 1,220.55 58.23 82791 CP UBS FINANCE DE 90262CCX3 11/10/2015 .420000 25,000,000.00 24,971,875.00 15,166.67 0.00 82794 CP ABBEY NATIONAL T 00280NDB3 11/13/2015 .500000 20,000,000.00 19,974,750.00 13,611.11 2,805.56 03/31/2016 .420697 24,958,583.33 99.887500 SUNGARD -1,875.00 Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 580 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 12/31/2015 Run: 01/11/2016 09:57:34 AMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 Page 15 82861 SO CP MUFG UNION BA 62478XAR1 12/24/2015 .280000 2,200,000.00 2,199,442.67 136.89 0.00 07/22/2016 .844216 4,975,033.33 99.639111 SUNGARD 0.00 01/25/2016 .280072 2,199,452.44 99.974667 SUNGARD -146.66 01/25/2016 .280073 1,199,701.33 99.974667 SUNGARD -80.00 82862 SO CP MUFG UNION BA 62478XAR1 12/24/2015 .280000 1,200,000.00 1,199,696.00 74.67 0.00 82853 CCCSD CP TOYOTA MOT 89233GGN0 12/21/2015 .840000 5,000,000.00 4,981,955.56 1,283.33 5,638.90 82850 CCCCD CP BNP PARIBA 09659BFM7 12/21/2015 .820000 1,995,000.00 1,990,138.85 499.86 2,954.81 06/21/2016 .823432 1,986,684.18 99.756333 SUNGARD 0.00 07/22/2016 .743270 3,982,404.44 99.639111 SUNGARD 0.00 82851 CCCSD CP ABBEY NATI 00280NGN4 12/21/2015 .740000 4,000,000.00 3,985,564.44 904.44 2,255.56 01/25/2016 .280068 7,298,183.12 99.974667 SUNGARD -486.67 01/25/2016 .280073 1,199,701.33 99.974667 SUNGARD -80.00 82863 SO CP MUFG UNION BA 62478XAR1 12/24/2015 .280000 1,200,000.00 1,199,696.00 74.67 0.00 82864 SO CP MUFG UNION BA 62478XAR1 12/24/2015 .280000 4,300,000.00 4,298,910.67 267.56 0.00 82865 SO CP MUFG UNION BA 62478XAR1 12/24/2015 .280000 7,300,000.00 7,298,150.67 454.22 0.00 01/25/2016 .280069 4,298,929.78 99.974667 SUNGARD -286.67 82832 CP TOYOTA MOTOR CRE 89233GER3 12/10/2015 .670000 25,000,000.00 24,948,645.83 10,236.11 16,111.11 05/16/2016 .651871 24,928,229.17 99.807333 SUNGARD 0.00 05/25/2016 .672089 24,922,298.61 99.794583 SUNGARD 0.00 05/27/2016 .692242 29,902,825.00 99.791750 SUNGARD 0.00 82834 CP BK OF NOVA SCOTI 06417JET5 12/10/2015 .690000 30,000,000.00 29,937,525.00 12,650.00 22,050.00 05/10/2016 .581452 24,937,569.44 99.815833 SUNGARD 0.00 06/21/2016 .823433 3,933,535.08 99.756333 SUNGARD 0.00 82826 CP NORDEA BANK AB 65558FED3 12/08/2015 .590000 30,000,000.00 29,943,475.00 11,800.00 8,866.67 82831 CP CREDIT AGRICOLE 22533TEG7 12/09/2015 .650000 25,000,000.00 24,951,833.33 10,381.94 13,222.22 05/13/2016 .591522 29,922,808.33 99.811583 SUNGARD 0.00 82835 CP BNP PARIBAS 09659BEX4 12/11/2015 .710000 30,000,000.00 29,935,825.00 12,425.00 25,166.67 06/13/2016 .793133 19,921,000.00 99.767667 SUNGARD 0.00 82840 CP BNP PARIBAS 09659BFD7 12/16/2015 .790000 20,000,000.00 19,953,533.33 7,022.22 25,511.11 82844 CP TOYOTA MOTOR CRE 89233GFP6 12/17/2015 .790000 10,000,000.00 9,975,350.00 3,291.67 13,533.33 82849 CCCCD CP BNP PARIBA 09659BFM7 12/21/2015 .820000 3,950,000.00 3,940,375.17 989.69 5,850.40 06/23/2016 .793290 9,958,525.00 99.753500 SUNGARD 0.00 82836 CP BANK OF NOVA SCO 06417JEX6 12/11/2015 .660000 30,000,000.00 29,935,825.00 11,550.00 18,875.00 05/31/2016 .712417 29,898,233.33 99.786083 SUNGARD 0.00 05/31/2016 .662088 29,905,400.00 99.786083 SUNGARD 0.00 06/24/2016 .793325 24,895,215.28 99.752083 SUNGARD 0.00 82839 CP BNP PARIBAS 09659BFQ8 12/16/2015 .790000 25,000,000.00 24,938,020.83 8,777.78 34,027.77 Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 581 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 12/31/2015 Run: 01/11/2016 09:57:34 AMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 Page 16 82615 PW NCD UNION BANK O 62478THN2 07/09/2015 .390000 1,100,000.00 1,100,038.44 2,097.33 38.44 01/06/2016 .390000 4,300,000.00 100.003494 SUNGARD 0.00 01/06/2016 .390000 1,100,000.00 100.003494 SUNGARD 0.00 01/06/2016 .390000 2,000,000.00 100.003494 SUNGARD 0.00 82616 PW NCD UNION BANK O 62478THN2 07/09/2015 .390000 2,000,000.00 2,000,069.88 3,813.33 69.88 05/26/2016 .730000 1,007,000.00 100.158414 SUNGARD 0.00 82576 CCCSIG YCD NORDEA B 65558LFA5 05/29/2015 1.150000 1,950,000.00 1,950,000.00 2,180.21 0.00 82614 PW NCD UNION BANK O 62478THN2 07/09/2015 .390000 4,300,000.00 4,300,150.25 8,198.67 150.25 05/26/2017 1.150000 1,950,000.00 100.000000 BOOK 0.00 82655 YCD ABBEY NATIONAL 00279H6T8 08/05/2015 .450000 25,000,000.00 25,001,498.09 46,562.50 1,498.09 82656 YCD CREDIT AGRICOLE 22533MX97 08/05/2015 .390000 25,000,000.00 25,003,640.37 40,354.17 3,640.37 01/08/2016 .450000 25,000,000.00 100.005992 SUNGARD 0.00 01/25/2016 .390000 25,000,000.00 100.014561 SUNGARD 0.00 01/08/2016 .250000 25,000,000.00 100.001553 SUNGARD 0.00 82701 YCD NORDEA BANK FIN 65558LHY1 09/25/2015 .250000 25,000,000.00 25,000,388.20 17,013.89 388.20 82328 PW NCD UNION BANK O 62478TEC9 02/02/2015 .400000 500,000.00 500,100.51 1,850.00 100.51 82563 RM YCD BNP PARIBAS 05572NYL4 05/26/2015 .730000 1,007,000.00 1,008,595.22 4,492.34 1,595.22 02/02/2016 .400000 500,000.00 100.020102 SUNGARD 0.00 05/20/2016 .730000 2,000,000.00 100.151940 SUNGARD 0.00 82562 PW YCD BNP PARIBAS 05572NYH3 05/20/2015 .730000 2,000,000.00 2,003,038.80 9,165.56 3,038.80 Inv Type: 72 NEGOTIABLE CERT OF DEPOSIT 01/29/2016 .360104 766,777.57 99.970444 SUNGARD -11.93 82871 PW CP BNP PARIBAS 09659BAV2 12/31/2015 .360000 900,000.00 899,734.00 9.00 0.00 01/29/2016 .360104 899,739.00 99.970444 SUNGARD -14.00 82866 SO CP MUFG UNION BA 62478XAR1 12/24/2015 .280000 3,900,000.00 3,899,012.00 242.67 0.00 01/25/2016 .280071 3,899,029.33 99.974667 SUNGARD -260.00 82870 PW CP BNP PARIBAS 09659BAV2 12/31/2015 .360000 767,000.00 766,773.31 7.67 0.00 82872 CP SOCIETE GENERALE 83369BGN0 12/30/2015 .770000 25,000,000.00 24,909,777.78 1,069.44 18,326.40 82874 CP NORDEA BANK AB 65558FFW0 12/30/2015 .770000 30,000,000.00 29,903,466.67 1,283.33 19,608.34 06/30/2016 .773026 29,882,575.00 99.678222 SUNGARD 0.00 06/30/2016 .813349 29,876,475.00 99.678222 SUNGARD 0.00 07/22/2016 .773391 24,890,381.94 99.639111 SUNGARD 0.00 82873 CP RABOBANK NEDERLA 21687AFW8 12/30/2015 .810000 30,000,000.00 29,903,466.67 1,350.00 25,641.67 .532704 953,197,334.12 99.843986 -29,977.78 Subtotal .531248 955,477,000.00 953,986,318.53 498,278.19 320,684.00 Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 582 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 12/31/2015 Run: 01/11/2016 09:57:34 AMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 Page 17 82730 PW YCD ABBEY NATION 00279JAK8 10/06/2015 .290000 1,750,000.00 1,750,021.36 1,226.46 21.36 01/04/2016 .290000 450,000.00 100.001221 SUNGARD 0.00 01/04/2016 .290000 1,750,000.00 100.001221 SUNGARD 0.00 01/04/2016 .290000 550,000.00 100.001221 SUNGARD 0.00 82731 PW YCD ABBEY NATION 00279JAK8 10/06/2015 .290000 550,000.00 550,006.71 385.46 6.71 82729 PW YCD ABBEY NATION 00279JAK8 10/06/2015 .290000 450,000.00 450,005.49 315.38 5.49 82727 PW YCD ABBEY NATION 00279JAK8 10/06/2015 .290000 21,500,000.00 21,500,262.47 15,067.92 262.47 01/04/2016 .290000 875,000.00 100.001221 SUNGARD 0.00 01/04/2016 .290000 21,500,000.00 100.001221 SUNGARD 0.00 01/04/2016 .290000 5,600,000.00 100.001221 SUNGARD 0.00 82728 PW YCD ABBEY NATION 00279JAK8 10/06/2015 .290000 5,600,000.00 5,600,068.37 3,924.67 68.37 01/04/2016 .290000 3,500,000.00 100.001221 SUNGARD 0.00 82732 PW YCD ABBEY NATION 00279JAK8 10/06/2015 .290000 3,500,000.00 3,500,042.73 2,452.92 42.73 82733 PW YCD ABBEY NATION 00279JAK8 10/06/2015 .290000 5,700,000.00 5,700,069.59 3,994.75 69.59 82734 PW YCD ABBEY NATION 00279JAK8 10/06/2015 .290000 4,500,000.00 4,500,054.94 3,153.75 54.94 01/04/2016 .290000 5,700,000.00 100.001221 SUNGARD 0.00 02/26/2016 .400000 30,000,000.00 100.034794 SUNGARD 0.00 82705 YCD STANDARD CHARTE 85325TDV4 09/30/2015 .400000 30,000,000.00 30,010,438.29 31,000.00 10,438.29 82706 YCD CREDIT AGRICOLE 22533M4V0 09/30/2015 .300000 30,000,000.00 30,002,696.53 23,250.00 2,696.53 82720 PW YCD ABBEY NATION 00279JAK8 10/06/2015 .290000 5,190,000.00 5,190,063.36 3,637.33 63.36 01/27/2016 .300000 30,000,000.00 100.008988 SUNGARD 0.00 82702 YCD BNP PARIBAS 05572NC79 09/25/2015 .320000 25,000,000.00 25,001,456.61 21,777.78 1,456.61 82726 PW YCD ABBEY NATION 00279JAK8 10/06/2015 .290000 875,000.00 875,010.68 613.23 10.68 01/15/2016 .320000 25,000,000.00 100.005826 SUNGARD 0.00 01/04/2016 .320000 30,000,000.00 100.001554 SUNGARD 0.00 82703 YCD CREDIT AGRICOLE 22533M4R9 09/28/2015 .320000 30,000,000.00 30,000,466.16 25,333.33 466.16 01/04/2016 .290000 5,190,000.00 100.001221 SUNGARD 0.00 82724 PW YCD ABBEY NATION 00279JAK8 10/06/2015 .290000 3,100,000.00 3,100,037.85 2,172.58 37.85 01/04/2016 .290000 3,000,000.00 100.001221 SUNGARD 0.00 01/04/2016 .290000 3,100,000.00 100.001221 SUNGARD 0.00 01/04/2016 .290000 4,000,000.00 100.001221 SUNGARD 0.00 82725 PW YCD ABBEY NATION 00279JAK8 10/06/2015 .290000 4,000,000.00 4,000,048.83 2,803.33 48.83 01/04/2016 .290000 1,090,000.00 100.001221 SUNGARD 0.00 82721 PW YCD ABBEY NATION 00279JAK8 10/06/2015 .290000 1,090,000.00 1,090,013.31 763.91 13.31 82722 PW YCD ABBEY NATION 00279JAK8 10/06/2015 .290000 2,100,000.00 2,100,025.64 1,471.75 25.64 82723 PW YCD ABBEY NATION 00279JAK8 10/06/2015 .290000 3,000,000.00 3,000,036.62 2,102.50 36.62 01/04/2016 .290000 2,100,000.00 100.001221 SUNGARD 0.00 Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 583 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 12/31/2015 Run: 01/11/2016 09:57:34 AMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 Page 18 82798 CCCSIG YCD SKANDINA 83050FBG5 11/17/2015 1.480000 2,175,000.00 2,175,000.00 4,023.75 0.00 02/01/2016 .250000 30,000,000.00 100.006213 SUNGARD 0.00 11/16/2017 1.480000 2,175,000.00 100.000000 BOOK 0.00 04/15/2016 .390000 25,000,000.00 100.014668 SUNGARD 0.00 82812 NCD BANK OF AMERICA 06052TRA0 11/25/2015 .390000 25,000,000.00 25,003,667.12 10,020.83 3,667.12 82759 NCD UNION BANK OF C 62478TKW8 10/21/2015 .250000 30,000,000.00 30,001,864.00 15,000.00 1,864.00 82756 NCD UNION BANK OF C 62478TKT5 10/20/2015 .260000 20,000,000.00 20,001,864.09 10,544.44 1,864.09 02/11/2016 .260000 20,000,000.00 100.009320 SUNGARD 0.00 02/24/2016 .340000 25,000,000.00 100.024419 SUNGARD 0.00 82757 YCD SOCIETE GENERAL 83369TH26 10/20/2015 .340000 25,000,000.00 25,006,104.76 17,236.11 6,104.76 06/07/2016 .700000 25,000,000.00 100.158695 SUNGARD 0.00 04/14/2016 .550000 30,000,000.00 100.061148 SUNGARD 0.00 82821 YCD BNP PARIBAS 05572NG34 12/04/2015 .550000 30,000,000.00 30,018,344.54 12,833.33 18,344.54 82822 YCD NORDEA BANK FIN 65558LLN0 12/04/2015 .510000 25,000,000.00 25,012,374.08 9,916.67 12,374.08 82827 NCD WELLS FARGO BAN 94988EMK1 12/08/2015 .700000 25,000,000.00 25,039,673.63 11,666.67 39,673.63 04/14/2016 .510000 25,000,000.00 100.049496 SUNGARD 0.00 82746 PW NCD UNION BANK O 62478TKL2 10/13/2015 .360000 400,000.00 400,022.34 320.00 22.34 04/11/2016 .360000 5,100,000.00 100.005585 SUNGARD 0.00 04/11/2016 .360000 400,000.00 100.005585 SUNGARD 0.00 04/11/2016 .360000 100,000.00 100.005585 SUNGARD 0.00 82747 PW NCD UNION BANK O 62478TKL2 10/13/2015 .360000 100,000.00 100,005.59 80.00 5.59 01/04/2016 .290000 4,500,000.00 100.001221 SUNGARD 0.00 04/11/2016 .360000 400,000.00 100.005585 SUNGARD 0.00 82744 PW NCD UNION BANK O 62478TKL2 10/13/2015 .360000 1,000,000.00 1,000,055.85 800.00 55.85 82745 PW NCD UNION BANK O 62478TKL2 10/13/2015 .360000 5,100,000.00 5,100,284.84 4,080.00 284.84 04/11/2016 .360000 1,000,000.00 100.005585 SUNGARD 0.00 82748 PW NCD UNION BANK O 62478TKL2 10/13/2015 .360000 1,000,000.00 1,000,055.85 800.00 55.85 04/11/2016 .360000 3,000,000.00 100.005585 SUNGARD 0.00 82751 PW NCD UNION BANK O 62478TKL2 10/13/2015 .360000 3,000,000.00 3,000,167.56 2,400.00 167.56 82752 PW NCD UNION BANK O 62478TKL2 10/13/2015 .360000 500,000.00 500,027.93 400.00 27.93 82753 PW NCD UNION BANK O 62478TKL2 10/13/2015 .360000 400,000.00 400,022.34 320.00 22.34 04/11/2016 .360000 500,000.00 100.005585 SUNGARD 0.00 82749 PW NCD UNION BANK O 62478TKL2 10/13/2015 .360000 1,000,000.00 1,000,055.85 800.00 55.85 04/11/2016 .360000 1,000,000.00 100.005585 SUNGARD 0.00 04/11/2016 .360000 1,000,000.00 100.005585 SUNGARD 0.00 04/11/2016 .360000 500,000.00 100.005585 SUNGARD 0.00 82750 PW NCD UNION BANK O 62478TKL2 10/13/2015 .360000 500,000.00 500,027.93 400.00 27.93 Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 584 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 12/31/2015 Run: 01/11/2016 09:57:34 AMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 Page 19 82859 YCD ABBEY NATL TREA 00279JBF8 12/23/2015 .800000 20,000,000.00 20,023,504.75 4,000.00 23,504.75 07/11/2016 .800000 20,000,000.00 100.117524 SUNGARD 0.00 82860 YCD NORDEA BANK FIN 65558LMA7 12/23/2015 .840000 25,000,000.00 25,036,697.38 5,250.00 36,697.38 07/22/2016 .830000 25,000,000.00 100.141142 SUNGARD 0.00 82857 YCD SOCIETE GENERAL 83369TR66 12/23/2015 .850000 25,000,000.00 25,035,501.87 5,312.50 35,501.87 07/08/2016 .850000 25,000,000.00 100.142007 SUNGARD 0.00 82858 YCD RABOBANK NEDERL 21685VKX6 12/23/2015 .830000 25,000,000.00 25,035,285.54 5,187.50 35,285.54 02/29/2016 .480000 2,644,000.00 100.049985 SUNGARD 0.00 82869 HR YCD BNP PARIBAS 05572NH33 12/31/2015 .480000 5,801,000.00 5,803,899.63 77.35 2,899.63 02/29/2016 .480000 5,801,000.00 100.049985 SUNGARD 0.00 82868 HR YCD BNP PARIBAS 05572NH33 12/31/2015 .480000 2,644,000.00 2,645,321.60 35.25 1,321.60 07/22/2016 .840000 25,000,000.00 100.146790 SUNGARD 0.00 82867 HR YCD BNP PARIBAS 05572NH33 12/31/2015 .480000 3,001,000.00 3,002,500.05 40.01 1,500.05 02/29/2016 .480000 3,001,000.00 100.049985 SUNGARD 0.00 07/22/2016 .840000 25,000,000.00 100.146790 SUNGARD 0.00 82842 YCD ROYAL BANK OF C 78009NYK6 12/17/2015 .805000 25,000,000.00 25,056,404.26 8,385.42 56,404.26 06/28/2016 .830000 30,000,000.00 100.244529 SUNGARD 0.00 82843 YCD CREDIT AGRICOLE 22534HBK6 12/17/2015 .790000 25,000,000.00 25,055,830.13 8,229.17 55,830.13 06/23/2016 .805000 25,000,000.00 100.225617 SUNGARD 0.00 82841 YCD BNP PARIBAS 05572NG67 12/17/2015 .830000 30,000,000.00 30,073,358.83 10,375.00 73,358.83 05/16/2016 .700000 25,000,000.00 100.136768 SUNGARD 0.00 82830 YCD CREDIT SUISSE 22549VLL5 12/09/2015 .700000 25,000,000.00 25,034,191.92 11,180.56 34,191.92 05/26/2016 .680000 25,000,000.00 100.138586 SUNGARD 0.00 82833 YCD ROYAL BANK OF C 78009NXU5 12/10/2015 .680000 25,000,000.00 25,034,646.46 10,388.89 34,646.46 06/27/2016 .790000 25,000,000.00 100.223321 SUNGARD 0.00 12/22/2016 .820000 500,000.00 100.118038 SUNGARD 0.00 82854 PW NCD UNION BANK O 62478TMF3 12/22/2015 .820000 500,000.00 500,590.19 113.89 590.19 82855 YCD STANDARD CHARTE 85325TEY7 12/23/2015 .870000 25,000,000.00 25,040,932.91 5,437.50 40,932.91 82856 YCD NORDEA BANK FIN 65558LMA7 12/23/2015 .840000 25,000,000.00 25,036,697.38 5,250.00 36,697.38 07/22/2016 .870000 25,000,000.00 100.163732 SUNGARD 0.00 07/22/2016 .640000 5,000,000.00 100.033830 SUNGARD 0.00 06/30/2016 .820000 30,000,000.00 100.120892 SUNGARD 0.00 82852 CCCSD NCD MUFG UNIO 62478TMC0 12/21/2015 .640000 5,000,000.00 5,001,691.52 977.78 1,691.52 82845 YCD STANDARD CHARTE 85325TEV3 12/18/2015 .820000 30,000,000.00 30,036,267.61 9,566.67 36,267.61 Subtotal .551735 782,883,000.00 783,501,285.63 472,624.34 618,285.63 .551735 782,883,000.00 100.078975 0.00 Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 585 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 12/31/2015 Run: 01/11/2016 09:57:34 AMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 Page 20 81217 CCCCD CORP BERKSHIR 084670BH0 02/11/2013 1.550000 245,000.00 245,399.35 1,497.90 739.90 01/08/2016 1.000000 5,000,000.00 100.001000 SUNGARD 0.00 81413 CCCCD CORP APPLE IN 037833AJ9 05/03/2013 1.000000 175,000.00 173,579.00 281.94 0.00 02/09/2018 1.579059 244,659.45 100.163000 SUNGARD 0.00 81198 CORP GENERAL ELECTR 36962G6R0 02/04/2013 1.000000 5,000,000.00 5,000,050.00 24,027.78 50.00 02/15/2017 1.203989 239,140.80 100.108000 SUNGARD 0.00 12/05/2017 1.104000 105,000.00 99.312000 SUNGARD -722.40 81054 CCCCD CORP CHEVRON 166764AA8 12/05/2012 1.104000 105,000.00 104,277.60 83.72 0.00 05/03/2018 1.076001 174,354.25 99.188000 SUNGARD -775.25 81789 CORP MICROSOFT CORP 594918AV6 01/10/2014 1.625000 6,406,000.00 6,446,870.28 7,228.99 78,409.44 01/08/2016 1.028965 4,996,350.00 100.001000 SUNGARD 0.00 81501 CORP GENERAL ELECTR 36962G6R0 06/18/2013 1.000000 5,000,000.00 5,000,050.00 24,027.78 3,700.00 10/05/2017 1.545080 4,944,500.00 99.706000 SUNGARD 0.00 81703 CORP TOYOTA MTR CRD 89233P6S0 11/15/2013 1.250000 5,000,000.00 4,985,300.00 14,930.56 40,800.00 80654 CCCCD CORP WALT DIS 25468PCS3 06/14/2012 1.125000 240,000.00 240,259.20 1,020.00 1,118.40 80653 CCCCD CORP WALT DIS 25468PCS3 06/14/2012 1.125000 135,000.00 135,145.80 573.75 396.90 02/15/2017 1.165961 134,748.90 100.108000 SUNGARD 0.00 Inv Type: 75 CORPORATE NOTES 09/29/2016 .900000 2,025,000.00 99.471111 SUNGARD -10,710.00 82130 CCCSIG YCD TORONTO 89112UXV8 09/29/2014 .900000 2,025,000.00 2,014,290.00 4,758.75 0.00 82760 CCCSIG MTN BMO HARR 05574BFW5 10/23/2015 1.000000 2,175,000.00 2,175,000.00 4,229.17 0.00 04/24/2017 1.000000 2,175,000.00 100.000000 BOOK 0.00 Subtotal .951786 4,200,000.00 4,189,290.00 8,987.92 0.00 .951786 4,200,000.00 99.745000 -10,710.00 Inv Type: 74 CERT OF DEPOSIT MEDIUM TERM 81794 CCCSIG CORP BERKSHI 084664CA7 01/10/2014 .470600 500,000.00 499,780.00 522.89 0.00 81269 CORP GENERAL ELEC C 36962GU51 03/08/2013 .518000 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 12,230.78 47,550.00 01/08/2016 2.390017 9,952,450.00 100.000000 SUNGARD 0.00 01/10/2017 .470600 500,000.00 99.956000 SUNGARD -220.00 Subtotal .515733 10,500,000.00 10,499,780.00 12,753.67 47,550.00 2.298200 10,452,450.00 99.997905 -220.00 Inv Type: 73 CORP NOTE FLTG RT ACT- 360 Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 586 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 12/31/2015 Run: 01/11/2016 09:57:34 AMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 Page 21 82349 CCCCD CORP IBM CORP 459200GX3 01/23/2015 1.950000 1,565,000.00 1,574,358.70 13,478.56 0.00 09/15/2016 .616979 1,591,418.40 100.556000 SUNGARD -22,744.80 07/22/2016 .490189 1,599,038.75 100.598000 SUNGARD -24,680.05 01/15/2016 .489343 1,602,483.40 100.031000 SUNGARD -21,993.60 82350 CCCCD CORP EI DU PO 263534CD9 01/23/2015 1.950000 1,580,000.00 1,580,489.80 14,206.83 0.00 82348 CCCCD CORP JOHN DEE 24422ERF8 01/23/2015 1.850000 1,560,000.00 1,568,673.60 8,497.67 0.00 82346 CCCCD CORP MERCK &58933YAD7 01/23/2015 .700000 1,590,000.00 1,590,159.00 1,329.42 0.00 05/18/2016 .435141 1,595,533.20 100.010000 SUNGARD -5,374.20 01/08/2016 .475357 1,597,965.90 100.001000 SUNGARD -7,950.00 82347 CCCCD CORP GECC 36962G6R0 01/23/2015 1.000000 1,590,000.00 1,590,015.90 7,640.83 0.00 01/30/2017 .828281 1,593,606.55 99.856000 SUNGARD -10,888.95 09/19/2016 .840060 1,574,028.75 101.274000 SUNGARD -29,600.25 82351 CCCCD CORP AMERICAN 0258M0DC0 01/23/2015 2.800000 1,525,000.00 1,544,428.50 12,098.33 0.00 82352 CCCCD CORP WELLS FA 94974BFL9 01/23/2015 1.250000 1,590,000.00 1,592,512.20 8,888.55 0.00 82353 CCCCD CORP US BANK 90331HMC4 01/23/2015 1.100000 1,585,000.00 1,582,717.60 7,313.01 0.00 07/20/2016 .787164 1,600,891.50 100.158000 SUNGARD -8,379.30 81948 CCCSIG CORP WAL-MAR 931142DN0 04/22/2014 1.000000 370,000.00 370,270.10 719.44 325.60 01/16/2018 1.720116 4,959,900.00 99.574000 SUNGARD 0.00 04/21/2017 1.005095 369,944.50 100.073000 SUNGARD 0.00 05/22/2017 1.200940 991,068.00 100.644000 SUNGARD -9,789.00 81956 CCCSIG CORP TOYOTA 89233P6D3 04/28/2014 1.750000 975,000.00 981,279.00 1,848.44 0.00 12/06/2018 1.750063 6,368,460.84 100.638000 SUNGARD 0.00 01/12/2018 1.496870 219,698.60 99.810000 SUNGARD -116.60 81813 CORP INTEL STRUCTUR 458140AL4 01/27/2014 1.350000 5,211,000.00 5,217,930.63 3,126.61 38,300.85 81899 CORP WELLS FARGO &94974BFG0 04/07/2014 1.500000 5,000,000.00 4,978,700.00 34,375.00 18,800.00 12/15/2017 1.510075 5,179,629.78 100.133000 SUNGARD 0.00 81991 CCCSIG CORP APPLE I 037833AM2 05/06/2014 1.050000 1,500,000.00 1,500,885.00 2,406.25 1,680.00 11/21/2017 1.151867 1,129,107.30 99.977000 SUNGARD 0.00 82203 CCCSIG CORP JOHNSON 478160BL7 11/21/2014 1.125000 1,130,000.00 1,129,740.10 1,412.50 632.80 82258 CORP CHEVRON CORP 166764AA8 12/15/2014 1.104000 10,000,000.00 9,931,200.00 7,973.33 0.00 82290 CCCSIG CORP TOYOTA 89236TCA1 01/12/2015 1.450000 220,000.00 219,582.00 1,497.53 0.00 12/05/2017 1.250044 9,957,510.00 99.312000 SUNGARD -26,310.00 82116 CCCSIG CORP WELLS F 94974BGB0 09/09/2014 1.400000 810,000.00 809,076.60 3,559.50 0.00 05/05/2017 1.067075 1,499,205.00 100.059000 SUNGARD 0.00 09/08/2017 1.433868 809,198.10 99.886000 SUNGARD -121.50 11/15/2017 1.345000 350,000.00 99.685000 SUNGARD -1,102.50 82197 CCCSIG CORP CHEVRON 166764AL4 11/18/2014 1.345000 350,000.00 348,897.50 601.51 0.00 Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 587 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 12/31/2015 Run: 01/11/2016 09:57:34 AMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 Page 22 82418 CORP CHEVRON CORP 166764AV2 03/09/2015 1.365000 5,000,000.00 4,960,000.00 22,560.42 0.00 03/06/2018 1.305000 125,000.00 99.841000 SUNGARD -198.75 03/02/2018 1.372881 4,999,089.53 99.200000 SUNGARD -39,089.53 03/13/2018 1.545883 129,825.80 99.267000 SUNGARD -778.70 82420 CCCCD CORP AMERICAN 02665WAT8 03/13/2015 1.500000 130,000.00 129,047.10 585.00 0.00 82417 CCCCD CORP EXXON MO 30231GAL6 03/06/2015 1.305000 125,000.00 124,801.25 521.09 0.00 82404 CCCSIG CORP CHEVRON 166764AV2 03/03/2015 1.365000 1,065,000.00 1,056,480.00 4,805.37 0.00 02/06/2018 1.274939 4,978,100.00 99.330000 SUNGARD -11,600.00 03/02/2018 1.365000 1,065,000.00 99.200000 SUNGARD -8,520.00 03/06/2018 1.305000 1,565,000.00 99.841000 SUNGARD -2,488.35 82416 CCCSIG CORP EXXON M 30231GAL6 03/06/2015 1.305000 1,565,000.00 1,562,511.65 6,524.10 0.00 08/07/2019 1.743001 117,603.00 113.284000 SUNGARD -4,319.00 82513 CCCCD CORP GENERAL 36962G4D3 04/15/2015 6.000000 100,000.00 113,284.00 2,400.00 0.00 82554 CORP APPLE INC 037833AJ9 05/12/2015 1.000000 10,000,000.00 9,918,800.00 16,111.11 0.00 82560 CCCSIG CORP APPLE I 037833BB5 05/13/2015 .900000 565,000.00 563,254.15 678.00 0.00 05/03/2018 1.257267 9,925,100.00 99.188000 SUNGARD -6,300.00 07/20/2016 .787164 1,998,597.25 100.158000 SUNGARD -10,460.95 82366 CCCCD CORP WELLS FA 94974BFL9 01/23/2015 1.250000 1,985,000.00 1,988,136.30 11,096.70 0.00 82367 CCCCD CORP IBM CORP 459200GX3 01/23/2015 1.950000 1,960,000.00 1,971,720.80 16,880.50 0.00 82368 CCCCD CORP JOHN DEE 24422ERF8 01/23/2015 1.850000 1,950,000.00 1,960,842.00 10,622.08 0.00 07/22/2016 .490189 2,002,630.00 100.598000 SUNGARD -30,909.20 82364 CCCCD CORP GE CAPIT 36962G6R0 01/23/2015 1.000000 1,990,000.00 1,990,019.90 9,563.06 0.00 82386 CORP IBM CORP 459200HZ7 02/11/2015 1.125000 5,000,000.00 4,966,500.00 22,656.25 0.00 01/08/2016 .475357 1,999,969.90 100.001000 SUNGARD -9,950.00 01/15/2016 .489343 2,003,104.25 100.031000 SUNGARD -27,492.00 82365 CCCCD CORP EI DU PO 263534CD9 01/23/2015 1.950000 1,975,000.00 1,975,612.25 17,758.54 0.00 09/15/2016 .616979 1,989,273.00 100.556000 SUNGARD -28,431.00 82375 CCCSIG CORP IBM COR 459200HZ7 02/06/2015 1.125000 1,880,000.00 1,867,404.00 8,518.75 0.00 01/30/2017 .828281 1,990,751.40 99.856000 SUNGARD -13,602.60 02/06/2018 1.228864 1,874,266.00 99.330000 SUNGARD -6,862.00 02/06/2018 1.228864 159,512.00 99.330000 SUNGARD -584.00 82376 CCCCD CORP IBM CORP 459200HZ7 02/06/2015 1.125000 160,000.00 158,928.00 725.00 0.00 05/18/2016 .435141 1,996,925.20 100.010000 SUNGARD -6,726.20 82369 CCCCD CORP MERCK &58933YAD7 01/23/2015 .700000 1,990,000.00 1,990,199.00 1,663.86 0.00 82370 CCCCD CORP AMERICAN 0258M0DC0 01/23/2015 2.800000 1,905,000.00 1,929,269.70 15,112.99 0.00 82371 CCCCD CORP US BANK 90331HMC4 01/23/2015 1.100000 1,980,000.00 1,977,148.80 9,135.50 0.00 09/19/2016 .840060 1,966,245.75 101.274000 SUNGARD -36,976.05 Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 588 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 12/31/2015 Run: 01/11/2016 09:57:34 AMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 Page 23 82713 CCCCD CORP PFIZER I 717081DL4 09/29/2015 2.100000 1,960,000.00 1,977,404.80 5,259.33 0.00 01/15/2017 .739645 1,556,060.50 99.804000 SUNGARD -6,231.00 05/15/2019 1.748923 1,984,068.80 100.888000 SUNGARD -6,664.00 07/19/2018 1.927831 1,558,393.82 101.955000 SUNGARD -10,358.60 82714 CCCCD CORP GOLDMAN 38147MAA3 09/29/2015 2.900000 1,510,000.00 1,539,520.50 19,705.50 0.00 82658 CCCSIG CORP 3M COMP 88579YAP6 08/07/2015 1.375000 1,340,000.00 1,337,186.00 7,370.00 0.00 82693 CORP JP MORGAN CHAS 46623EKD0 09/15/2015 1.700000 5,000,000.00 4,975,750.00 28,333.34 0.00 82712 CCCCD CORP PFIZER I 717081DD2 09/29/2015 .900000 1,550,000.00 1,546,962.00 6,432.50 0.00 03/01/2018 1.769114 4,995,005.56 99.515000 SUNGARD -15,950.00 82715 CCCCD CORP GOLDMAN 38147MAA3 09/29/2015 2.900000 1,930,000.00 1,967,731.50 25,186.50 0.00 02/15/2019 1.739996 1,994,047.55 109.280000 SUNGARD -21,611.80 82718 CCCCD CORP CISCO SY 17275RAE2 09/29/2015 4.950000 1,795,000.00 1,961,576.00 33,566.50 0.00 82716 CCCCD CORP MICROSOF 594918AC8 09/29/2015 4.200000 1,400,000.00 1,514,142.00 4,900.00 0.00 07/19/2018 1.927831 1,991,854.36 101.955000 SUNGARD -13,239.80 06/01/2019 1.599996 1,529,290.00 108.153000 SUNGARD -15,148.00 04/25/2019 1.710407 1,982,935.50 100.733000 SUNGARD -18,642.00 82717 CCCCD CORP US BANCO 91159HHH6 09/29/2015 2.200000 1,950,000.00 1,964,293.50 7,865.00 0.00 82581 CORP JP MORGAN CHAS 46625HJL5 06/02/2015 1.625000 5,000,000.00 4,962,900.00 10,381.94 0.00 05/22/2018 1.603145 124,988.75 99.626000 SUNGARD -456.25 05/15/2018 1.658000 4,995,250.00 99.258000 SUNGARD -32,350.00 06/15/2018 1.655855 1,724,706.75 100.418000 SUNGARD 0.00 82586 CCCSIG CORP CISCO S 17275RAU6 06/17/2015 1.650000 1,725,000.00 1,732,210.50 1,265.00 7,503.75 05/12/2017 .934955 564,610.15 99.691000 SUNGARD -1,356.00 08/07/2018 1.435833 1,337,614.80 99.790000 SUNGARD -428.80 82574 CCCSIG CORP BK OF N 06406HDB2 05/29/2015 1.600000 1,600,000.00 1,594,016.00 2,773.33 0.00 82575 CCCCD CORP BK OF NE 06406HDB2 05/29/2015 1.600000 125,000.00 124,532.50 216.67 0.00 05/22/2018 1.603145 1,599,856.00 99.626000 SUNGARD -5,840.00 82621 CORP TOYOTA MOTOR C 89236TCP8 07/16/2015 1.550000 5,000,000.00 4,988,200.00 36,166.66 0.00 07/13/2018 1.579121 409,651.50 99.764000 SUNGARD -619.10 07/13/2018 1.567156 4,998,145.83 99.764000 SUNGARD -9,300.00 07/17/2017 1.139621 99,968.00 99.993000 SUNGARD 0.00 82634 CCCCD CORP PEPSICO 713448CW6 07/17/2015 1.125000 100,000.00 99,993.00 512.50 25.00 06/15/2018 1.655855 129,977.90 100.418000 SUNGARD 0.00 82587 CCCCD CORP CISCO SY 17275RAU6 06/17/2015 1.650000 130,000.00 130,543.40 95.33 565.50 82598 CCCSIG CORP WELLS F 94974BGB0 07/07/2015 1.400000 1,100,000.00 1,098,746.00 4,833.89 0.00 82620 CCCSIG CORP TOYOTA 89236TCP8 07/13/2015 1.550000 410,000.00 409,032.40 2,965.67 0.00 09/08/2017 1.252137 1,103,465.00 99.886000 SUNGARD -4,719.00 Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 589 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 12/31/2015 Run: 01/11/2016 09:57:34 AMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 Page 24 01/01/2016 .000000 537,226.12 100.000000 BOOK 0.00 81524 AUHSD MM DREYFUS TA 26202K205 06/27/2013 .000000 537,226.12 537,226.12 0.00 0.00 81525 AUHSD MM DREYFUS TA 26202K205 06/27/2013 .000000 28,092.20 28,092.20 0.00 0.00 01/01/2016 .000000 28,092.20 100.000000 BOOK 0.00 .000000 565,318.32 100.000000 0.00 Subtotal .000000 565,318.32 565,318.32 0.00 0.00 Inv Type: 99 MONEY MARKET ACCOUNTS 82800 CCCSIG CD HSBC BK U 40428AR41 11/18/2015 .954100 2,175,000.00 2,175,000.00 2,536.32 0.00 11/17/2017 .954100 2,175,000.00 100.000000 BOOK 0.00 82808 CCCSIG CD SVENSKA H 86958DH54 11/24/2015 .828000 1,340,000.00 1,340,000.00 1,171.16 0.00 08/24/2017 .828000 1,340,000.00 100.000000 BOOK 0.00 Subtotal .906028 3,515,000.00 3,515,000.00 3,707.48 0.00 .906028 3,515,000.00 100.000000 0.00 Inv Type: 80 YCD / NCD QTR FLTR 04/06/2017 1.010000 2,150,000.00 100.000000 BOOK 0.00 82526 CCCSIG YCD RABOBANK 21684BXH2 04/27/2015 1.070000 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 4,161.10 0.00 09/11/2017 1.430018 1,996,780.00 99.839000 BOOK 0.00 82487 CCCSIG YCD CANADIAN 13606JYY9 04/10/2015 1.010000 2,150,000.00 2,150,000.00 5,127.14 0.00 11/06/2017 1.560000 2,450,000.00 100.000000 BOOK 0.00 82118 CCCSIG NCD US BANK 90333VPF1 09/11/2014 1.375000 2,000,000.00 1,996,780.00 8,402.78 0.00 04/21/2017 1.070000 2,000,000.00 100.000000 BOOK 0.00 82788 CCCSIG YCD BK NOVA 06417GAS7 11/09/2015 1.560000 2,450,000.00 2,450,000.00 5,520.67 0.00 1.278261 8,596,780.00 99.962558 0.00 Subtotal 1.265482 8,600,000.00 8,596,780.00 23,211.69 0.00 Inv Type: 79 YCD/NCD 30/360 82779 CCCSIG CORP MICROSO 594918BF0 11/03/2015 1.300000 1,590,000.00 1,588,410.00 3,330.17 0.00 82719 CCCCD CORP BB&T CAL 05531FAQ6 09/29/2015 2.250000 1,960,000.00 1,967,702.80 18,375.00 0.00 11/03/2018 1.334116 1,588,410.00 99.900000 BOOK 0.00 02/01/2019 1.927457 1,987,430.20 100.393000 SUNGARD -12,622.40 Subtotal 1.519862 138,957,000.00 139,126,659.26 602,098.88 193,048.14 1.271249 139,569,166.02 100.122095 -591,373.48 Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 590 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 12/31/2015 Run: 01/11/2016 09:57:34 AMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 Page 25 82001 CD CCCCD BERTA KAMM 121101042 05/24/2014 .600000 3,335.77 3,335.77 32.63 0.00 05/24/2017 .600000 3,335.77 100.000000 BOOK 0.00 .600000 3,335.77 100.000000 0.00 Subtotal .600000 3,335.77 3,335.77 32.63 0.00 Inv Type: 1000 TD WITH CALC CODE OF CSC-00 Grand Total Count 393 .727041 2,570,711,453.24 2,569,513,821.31 2,925,791.98 1,469,719.74 .695505 2,570,728,827.44 99.953412 -3,099,344.95 Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 591 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 592 SECTION III APPENDIX B. INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO DETAIL – MANAGED BY OUTSIDE CONTRACTED PARTIES B.1. STATE OF CALIFORNIA LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND (LAIF) March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 593 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2015 CALIFORNIA STATE LOCAL STATE CONTROLLER ACCOUNT ESTIMATED AGENCY INVESTMENT ACCOUNTS ACCOUNT NUMBER BALANCE FAIR VALUE ACALANES UNION HIGH SCHOOL 75-07-010 948,370.41 947,599.35 ANTIOCH UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 75-07-005 825,980.42 825,308.87 BRENTWOOD UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT 75-07-013 8,136,121.89 8,129,506.92 BYRON UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT 75-07-017 165,471.40 165,336.87 CANYON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT 75-07-018 192,374.05 192,217.64 CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT 70-07-001 50,000,000.00 49,959,348.15 CONTRA COSTA COMMUNITY COLLEGE 75-07-001 615,575.23 615,074.74 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY 99-07-000 50,000,000.00 49,959,348.15 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION 75-07-007 1,281,647.96 1,280,605.93 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SCHOOL INSURANCE GROUP 35-07-001 2,231,151.44 2,229,337.43 CROCKETT COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 16-07-004 2,881,500.66 2,879,157.89 DELTA DIABLO SANITATION DISTRICT 70-07-003 72,570.12 72,511.12 EAST CONTRA COSTA REG FEE & FINANCING AUTH 40-07-006 1,009,046.88 1,008,226.49 JOHN SWETT UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 75-07-020 2,395.37 2,393.42 KENSINGTON FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 17-07-011 3,003,920.70 3,001,478.40 KENSINGTON POLICE PROTECTION & COMMUNITY 16-07-003 145,491.91 145,373.62 SERVICES DISTRICT LAFAYETTE SCHOOL DISTRICT 75-07-012 5,283,825.43 5,279,529.48 MARTINEZ UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 75-07-011 3,819,575.40 3,816,469.94 MORAGA ORINDA FIRE DISTRICT 17-07-003 15,061.82 15,049.57 MT DIABLO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 75-07-008 14,636,510.59 14,624,610.57 MT VIEW SANITARY DISTRICT 70-07-008 7,194,141.81 7,188,292.71 OAKLEY UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT 75-07-009 247,152.48 246,951.54 ORINDA UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT 75-07-015 7,405,146.62 7,399,125.96 PITTSBURG UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 75-07-002 33,856,582.96 33,829,056.31 RECLAMATION DISTRICT 800 60-07-003 5,407,998.94 5,403,602.04 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 65-07-015 6,982.65 6,976.97 RODEO -HERCULES FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 17-07-001 105,813.05 105,727.02 SAN RAMON VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 75-07-004 239,479.92 239,285.21 WALNUT CREEK SCHOOL DISTRICT 75-07-003 0.00 0.00 WEST CONTRA COSTA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 75-07-014 9,991,756.03 9,983,632.36 TOTAL 209,721,646.14 209,551,134.68 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 594 SECTION III APPENDIX B. INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO DETAIL – MANAGED BY OUTSIDE CONTRACTED PARTIES B.2. ASSET MANAGEMENT FUNDS a.WELLS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT b. CalTRUST March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 595 Wells Capital Management GAAPWC-Contra Costa County (19529)Quarter End (Q4 Y2015)10/01/2015 - 12/31/2015Dated: 01/11/2016Locked DownMarch 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes596 Risk Summary (WC-Contra Costa County (19529))1Performance Summary Gross of Fees (WC-Contra Costa County (19529))4Performance Summary Net of Fees (WC-Contra Costa County (19529))6GAAP Financials (WC-Contra Costa County (19529))8Income Detail (WC-Contra Costa County (19529))9Balance Sheet Classification (WC-Contra Costa County (19529))12Trading Activity (WC-Contra Costa County (19529))16Transaction Detail (WC-Contra Costa County (19529))21MMF Transaction Detail (WC-Contra Costa County (19529))25Roll Forward (WC-Contra Costa County (19529))27Shock Analysis (WC-Contra Costa County (19529))31Table of ContentsDated: 01/11/2016March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes597 Asset ClassIssuer ConcentrationIssuer Concentration% of Base MarketValue + AccruedWells Fargo Funds Trust3.153%Orange, County of1.785%International Bank for Reconstruction & Development6.601%Government of the United States21.49%Federal National Mortgage Association2.275%Federal Home Loan Banks Office of Finance14.658%Federal Farm Credit Banks Funding Corporation4.51%Other45.529%---100.00%Security TypeMarket SectorCash and Fixed Income SummaryRisk MetricValueCash215.73MMFund1,399,428.32Fixed Income42,982,168.66Duration0.423Convexity0.00WAL0.594Years to Final Maturity0.759Years to Effective Maturity0.594Yield0.817Book Yield0.575Avg Credit RatingAA+/Aa1/AA+Balance SheetBook Value + Accrued44,434,187.37Net Unrealized Gain/Loss-52,374.67Market Value + Accrued44,381,812.71Risk SummaryWC-Contra Costa County (19529)10/01/2015 - 12/31/2015Return to Table of ContentsDated: 01/11/20161March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes598 Credit Duration Heat MapRating0 - 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 3 - 4 4 - 5 5 - 7 7 - 10 10 - 15 15 - 30AAA 60.883% 5.109% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%AA17.126% 1.24% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%A15.642% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%BBB0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%BB0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%B0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%CCC0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%CC0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%C0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%NA0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%Time To MaturityCredit RatingDurationRisk SummaryWC-Contra Costa County (19529)10/01/2015 - 12/31/2015Return to Table of ContentsDated: 01/11/20162March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes599 MMF Asset AllocationCountryCurrencyBase Exposure - Industry SectorBase Exposure - Industry GroupBase Exposure - Industry SubgroupRisk SummaryWC-Contra Costa County (19529)10/01/2015 - 12/31/2015Return to Table of ContentsDated: 01/11/20163March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes600 Gross of Fees (includes trading). Returns are actual and have not been annualized. No Tax Adjustment. Note that data will not exist prior to the performance inception date of: 04/01/2001. Historical data exists for the options shown below:PeriodPeriod BeginPeriod EndTotal ReturnIndex Total ReturnExcess Total ReturnMonth to Date12/01/201512/31/2015-0.007%0.043%-0.049%Quarter to Date10/01/201512/31/20150.021%0.003%0.018%Year to Date01/01/201512/31/20150.427%0.221%0.206%Prior Month11/01/201511/30/2015-0.005%-0.006%0.001%Prior Quarter07/01/201509/30/20150.108%0.106%0.001%Prior Year01/01/201412/31/20140.319%0.12%0.199%Trailing Month12/01/201512/31/2015-0.007%0.043%-0.049%Trailing Quarter10/01/201512/31/20150.021%0.003%0.018%Trailing Year01/01/201512/31/20150.427%0.221%0.206%AccountIndexIndex Start DateIndex End DateWC-Contra Costa CountyML 6 Month T-Bill01/31/198011/30/2004WC-Contra Costa CountyBofA Merrill Lynch 6 Month Treasury Bill Index (G0O2)12/01/2004---Performance Summary Gross of FeesWC-Contra Costa County (19529)Base Currency: USD As of 12/31/2015Return to Table of ContentsDated: 01/11/20164March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes601 Reported Index Return is always Total Return.Begin DateEnd DateReturn TypeFee OptionsTax Options04/01/200101/31/2011Total ReturnNet of Fees, Gross of FeesGross Down Method, No Tax Adjustment, Gross Up Method04/01/200101/31/2011Income ReturnGross of FeesNo Tax Adjustment04/01/200101/31/2011Price ReturnGross of FeesNo Tax Adjustment04/01/200101/31/2011Book ReturnNet of Fees, Gross of FeesGross Down Method, No Tax Adjustment, Gross Up MethodPerformance Summary Gross of FeesWC-Contra Costa County (19529)Base Currency: USD As of 12/31/2015Return to Table of ContentsDated: 01/11/20165March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes602 Net of Fees (includes management and trading). Returns are actual and have not been annualized. No Tax Adjustment. Note that data will not exist prior to the performance inception date of: 04/01/2001. Historical data exists for the options shown below:PeriodPeriod BeginPeriod EndTotal ReturnIndex Total ReturnExcess Total ReturnMonth to Date12/01/201512/31/2015-0.016%0.043%-0.059%Quarter to Date10/01/201512/31/2015-0.007%0.003%-0.01%Year to Date01/01/201512/31/20150.313%0.221%0.092%Prior Month11/01/201511/30/2015-0.014%-0.006%-0.008%Prior Quarter07/01/201509/30/20150.094%0.106%-0.013%Prior Year01/01/201412/31/20140.203%0.12%0.083%Trailing Month12/01/201512/31/2015-0.016%0.043%-0.059%Trailing Quarter10/01/201512/31/2015-0.007%0.003%-0.01%Trailing Year01/01/201512/31/20150.313%0.221%0.092%AccountIndexIndex Start DateIndex End DateWC-Contra Costa CountyML 6 Month T-Bill01/31/198011/30/2004WC-Contra Costa CountyBofA Merrill Lynch 6 Month Treasury Bill Index (G0O2)12/01/2004---Performance Summary Net of FeesWC-Contra Costa County (19529)Base Currency: USD As of 12/31/2015Return to Table of ContentsDated: 01/11/20166March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes603 Reported Index Return is always Total Return.Begin DateEnd DateReturn TypeFee OptionsTax Options04/01/200101/31/2011Total ReturnNet of Fees, Gross of FeesGross Down Method, No Tax Adjustment, Gross Up Method04/01/200101/31/2011Income ReturnGross of FeesNo Tax Adjustment04/01/200101/31/2011Price ReturnGross of FeesNo Tax Adjustment04/01/200101/31/2011Book ReturnNet of Fees, Gross of FeesGross Down Method, No Tax Adjustment, Gross Up MethodPerformance Summary Net of FeesWC-Contra Costa County (19529)Base Currency: USD As of 12/31/2015Return to Table of ContentsDated: 01/11/20167March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes604 Balance SheetWC-Contra Costa CountyAs of:09/30/201512/31/2015Book Value44,295,291.2744,321,585.83Accrued Balance91,003.06112,601.55Book Value + Accrued44,386,294.3244,434,187.37Net Unrealized Gain/Loss-1,361.39-52,374.67Market Value + Accrued44,384,932.9344,381,812.71Income StatementWC-Contra Costa CountyBegin DateEnd Date10/01/201512/31/2015Net Amortization/Accretion Income-43,826.70Interest Income103,721.99Dividend Income0.00Misc Income0.00Income Subtotal103,721.99Net Realized Gain/Loss486.48Impairment Loss0.00Net Gain/Loss486.48Expense-12,488.72Net Income47,893.05Transfers In/Out0.00Change in Unrealized Gain/Loss-51,013.28Statement of Cash FlowsWC-Contra Costa CountyBegin DateEnd Date10/01/201512/31/2015Net Income47,893.05Amortization/Accretion on MS43,972.92Change in Accrued on MS-15,648.96Net Gain/Loss on MS-486.48Change in Unrealized G/L on CE-75.29Subtotal27,762.19Purchases of MS-7,926,702.19Purchased Accrued of MS-6,404.53Sales of MS3,012,312.98Sold Accrued of MS455.00Maturities of MS4,255,000.00Net Purchases/Sales-665,338.74Transfers of Cash & CE0.00Total Change in Cash & CE-589,683.49Beginning Cash & CE1,989,327.55Ending Cash & CE1,399,644.05GAAP FinancialsWC-Contra Costa County (19529)10/01/2015 - 12/31/2015Return to Table of ContentsDated: 01/11/20168March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes605 IdentifierBase Current Units DescriptionCoupon Final Maturity EffectiveMaturityTransfers In/Out Net RealizedGain/LossNet Amortization/Accretion IncomeInterest/DividendIncomeBaseExpenseBase Net Income Settle Date02665WAY7500,000.00 AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORP1.02 09/20/2017 09/20/20170.000.000.001,043.48 0.001,043.48 09/24/201503255LGX1750,000.00 ANAHEIM CALIF PUB FING AUTH LEASEREV1.00 05/01/2016 05/01/20160.000.000.001,875.00 0.001,875.00 11/14/201406050TLU4500,000.00 BANK OF AMERICA NA0.832 02/14/2017 02/14/20170.000.000.001,029.19 0.001,029.19 02/14/201406050TMB5250,000.00 BANK OF AMERICA NA0.902 06/05/2017 06/05/20170.000.000.00520.44 0.00520.44 06/05/201506406HBX6750,000.00 BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORP2.30 07/28/2016 07/28/20160.000.00-3,113.724,312.50 0.001,198.78 01/21/201505531FAG8750,000.00 BB&T CORP3.20 03/15/2016 02/15/20160.000.00-4,751.396,000.00 0.001,248.61 04/06/2015084664CD1750,000.00 BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY FINANCE CORP 0.621 01/12/2018 01/12/20180.000.000.001,180.84 0.001,180.84 01/15/2015097023BC80.00 BOEING CO3.75 11/20/2016 11/20/20160.000.00-3,005.853,906.25 0.00900.40 01/26/2015097023BC8750,000.00 BOEING CO3.75 11/20/2016 11/20/20160.000.00-2,416.473,125.00 0.00708.53 01/26/2015CCYUSD-9.65 Cash0.00 12/31/2015 12/31/20150.000.000.000.00 -12,488.72-12,488.72 ---14912L4X6775,000.00 CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICESCORP2.05 08/01/2016 08/01/20160.000.00-2,727.563,971.88 0.001,244.31 11/04/2014161571GJ7775,000.00 CHAIT 2014-A1 A11.15 01/15/2019 01/14/20170.000.00-252.142,228.13 0.001,975.99 08/07/201517275RAY8750,000.00 CISCO SYSTEMS INC0.822 06/15/2018 06/15/20180.000.000.001,320.36 0.001,320.36 06/17/2015191216BR0300,000.00 COCA-COLA CO0.875 10/27/2017 10/27/20170.000.0011.92466.67 0.00478.58 10/27/20153133EDGC00.00 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK0.25 11/04/2015 11/04/20150.000.00122.17229.17 0.00351.34 03/24/20143133EDXG20.00 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK0.67 10/14/2016 10/14/20160.000.00-36.62241.94 0.00205.32 10/24/20143133EFBT31,000,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS FUNDINGCORP0.42 09/01/2016 09/01/20160.000.0050.271,050.00 0.001,100.27 09/01/20153133EDQW51,000,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS FUNDINGCORP0.29 01/21/2016 01/21/20160.000.00225.72725.00 0.00950.72 08/01/20143130A4KE1500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS0.33 04/01/2016 04/01/20160.000.0019.31412.50 0.00431.80 04/01/20153130A3J701,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS0.625 11/23/2016 11/23/20160.000.00-145.84642.36 0.00496.52 05/18/20153130A3J700.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS0.625 11/23/2016 11/23/20160.000.00-207.24920.14 0.00712.90 05/18/20153130A2T971,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS0.50 09/28/2016 09/28/20160.000.00-241.381,055.56 0.00814.18 10/15/20153130A2T97500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS0.50 09/28/2016 09/28/20160.000.00-104.89625.00 0.00520.11 09/30/2015313384SS91,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS0.00 02/05/2016 02/05/20160.000.00638.890.00 0.00638.89 02/06/2015313384ZK8500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS0.00 07/15/2016 07/15/20160.000.0076.250.00 0.0076.25 12/23/20153130A3XU31,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS0.25 01/22/2016 01/22/20160.000.0033.22625.00 0.00658.22 01/27/2015313373SZ61,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS2.125 06/10/2016 06/10/20160.000.00-4,062.305,312.50 0.001,250.20 07/16/20143136FPET01,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGEASSOCIATION2.00 03/10/2016 03/10/20160.000.00-4,195.205,000.00 0.00804.80 03/26/20153133EDGM80.00 FFCB 0.350 03/10/16 CALd0.35 03/10/2016 03/10/20160.00354.0644.57175.00 0.00573.62 03/14/20143133EDGM80.00 FFCB 0.350 03/10/16 CALd0.35 03/10/2016 03/10/20160.00132.4316.6735.00 0.00184.10 03/24/20143137EACW7235,000.00 FREDDIE MAC2.00 08/25/2016 08/25/20160.000.00-127.40208.89 0.0081.49 12/15/201531679KAB686,721.92 FTAT-142-A2A0.45 04/17/2017 01/29/20160.000.005.16178.90 0.00184.06 06/11/201431680GAB2500,000.00 FTAT-151-A2A1.02 05/15/2018 10/10/20160.000.001.47793.34 0.00794.81 11/05/201536164EAB10.00 GEETT-151-A20.89 11/24/2017 06/06/20160.000.0029.25800.32 0.00829.57 03/04/201536962G6Q2750,000.00 GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORP0.918 01/08/2016 01/08/20160.000.00-422.081,754.58 0.001,332.50 09/23/201341284AAB465,802.65 HARLY-141-A2A0.49 04/15/2018 03/13/20160.00-0.011.39104.40 0.00105.78 04/16/201441284BAB2319,404.33 HARLY-151-A2A0.80 01/15/2019 07/22/20160.000.000.66714.21 0.00714.88 01/28/20154197915E4750,000.00 HAWAII ST0.731 08/01/2016 08/01/20160.000.000.001,370.63 0.001,370.63 11/25/2014437076BJ0750,000.00 HOME DEPOT INC0.882 09/15/2017 09/15/20170.000.000.001,417.37 0.001,417.37 09/15/201543814GAB60.00 HONDO-142-A20.39 09/19/2016 12/18/20150.000.000.4821.11 0.0021.59 05/21/201443814KAB7252,965.61 HONDO-151-A20.70 06/15/2017 04/22/20160.00-0.014.96520.87 0.00525.83 01/28/2015459058DM21,000,000.00 INTERNATIONAL BANK FORRECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOP0.50 05/16/2016 05/16/20160.000.005.27388.89 0.00394.16 12/03/2015459056HY6771,000.00 INTERNATIONAL BANK FORRECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOP0.00 02/15/2016 02/15/20160.000.00867.760.00 0.00867.76 04/30/2015459056HY6163,000.00 INTERNATIONAL BANK FORRECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOP0.00 02/15/2016 02/15/20160.000.00206.960.00 0.00206.96 05/20/2015Income DetailWC-Contra Costa County (19529)Base Currency: USD 10/01/2015 - 12/31/2015Return to Table of ContentsDated: 01/11/20169March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes606 IdentifierBase Current Units DescriptionCoupon Final Maturity EffectiveMaturityTransfers In/Out Net RealizedGain/LossNet Amortization/Accretion IncomeInterest/DividendIncomeBaseExpenseBase Net Income Settle Date45905U7F51,000,000.00 INTERNATIONAL BK FOR RECON & DEVMEDIUM TERM BK N0.45 07/19/2016 07/19/20160.000.000.001,125.00 0.001,125.00 06/26/201547787VAB70.00 JDOT-14-A20.45 09/15/2016 12/15/20150.00-0.000.4057.10 0.0057.50 04/09/201447787VAB70.00 JDOT-14-A20.45 09/15/2016 12/15/20150.00-0.000.000.00 0.00-0.00 04/09/201447787WAB5400,000.00 JDOT-15B-A20.98 06/15/2018 11/12/20160.000.002.14980.01 0.00982.14 09/09/201546625HHW3750,000.00 JPMORGAN CHASE & CO2.60 01/15/2016 01/15/20160.000.00-3,267.414,875.00 0.001,607.59 01/21/2015544587B72490,000.00 LOS ANGELES CALIF MUN IMPT CORPLEASE REV1.26 11/01/2016 11/01/20160.000.000.00720.30 0.00720.30 11/19/20155446462Q4400,000.00 LOS ANGELES CALIF UNI SCH DIST0.486 01/01/2016 01/01/20160.000.000.00486.00 0.00486.00 08/19/201458768EAC30.00 MBALT 2014-A A2A0.48 06/15/2016 10/15/20150.00-0.000.012.92 0.002.92 04/09/201458772PAB4650,000.00 MBART-151-A2A0.82 06/15/2018 09/11/20160.000.0041.87340.53 0.00382.39 12/08/2015605581FW20.00 MISSISSIPPI ST0.64 10/01/2016 10/01/20160.000.000.005.33 0.005.33 02/18/2015605581FW2300,000.00 MISSISSIPPI ST0.64 10/01/2016 10/01/20160.000.000.00474.67 0.00474.67 02/18/201565477WAB2396,490.98 NART-14B-A20.60 06/15/2017 03/23/20160.000.017.94742.06 0.00750.00 12/10/2014677520FR40.00 OH ST-TXB-DEV ASST-A5.39 10/01/2015 10/01/20150.000.000.000.00 0.000.00 07/11/201468428LDH4300,000.00 ORANGE CNTY CALIF PENSION OBLIG0.68 02/01/2016 02/01/20160.000.000.00510.00 0.00510.00 02/27/201568428LDH4490,000.00 ORANGE CNTY CALIF PENSION OBLIG0.68 02/01/2016 02/01/20160.000.000.00833.00 0.00833.00 01/13/201569371RK960.00 PACCAR FINANCIAL CORP0.70 11/16/2015 11/16/20150.000.00-62.39179.38 0.00116.99 12/23/201469371RK960.00 PACCAR FINANCIAL CORP0.70 11/16/2015 11/16/20150.000.00-183.60437.50 0.00253.90 04/02/201570659PAE10.00 PENAR 2013-1A A10.589 11/18/2017 11/18/20150.000.000.00592.77 0.00592.77 11/21/201369349LAH1750,000.00 PNC BANK,NA0.80 01/28/2016 01/28/20160.000.00-649.091,500.00 0.00850.91 04/30/201574256LAC30.00 PRINCIPAL LIFE GLOBAL FUNDING II1.00 12/11/2015 12/11/20150.000.00-273.80486.11 0.00212.31 06/30/2014CCYUSD225.38 Receivable0.00 12/31/2015 12/31/20150.000.000.000.00 0.000.00 ---762494QV7250,000.00 RIALTO CALIF UNI SCH DIST1.258 02/01/2017 02/01/20170.000.000.00786.25 0.00786.25 03/26/201576912TJC8125,000.00 RIVERSIDE CNTY CALIF PUB FING AUTHTAX ALLOC REV1.00 09/01/2016 09/01/20160.000.0093.10312.50 0.00405.60 03/26/2015857477AH6285,000.00 STATE STREET CORP2.875 03/07/2016 03/07/20160.000.00-1,614.402,048.44 0.00434.03 03/23/2015857477AH6300,000.00 STATE STREET CORP2.875 03/07/2016 03/07/20160.000.00-1,755.212,156.25 0.00401.04 03/03/201589236WAB4495,855.46 TART-15A-A20.71 07/17/2017 04/29/20160.00-0.001.411,003.52 0.001,004.93 03/04/201589116EC19750,000.00 Toronto Dominion Holdings (U.S.A.), Inc.0.00 03/01/2016 03/01/20160.000.00245.420.00 0.00245.42 12/01/201589116FYH70.00 Toronto Dominion Holdings (U.S.A.), Inc.0.00 11/17/2015 11/17/20150.000.00146.220.00 0.00146.22 08/28/201589116FYH70.00 Toronto Dominion Holdings (U.S.A.), Inc.0.00 11/17/2015 11/17/20150.000.00137.080.00 0.00137.08 04/14/201589233AHP7500,000.00 Toyota Motor Credit Corporation0.592 02/19/2016 02/19/20160.000.000.00485.23 0.00485.23 08/28/2015912828B821,000,000.00 UNITED STATES TREASURY0.25 02/29/2016 02/29/20160.000.00475.12631.87 0.001,106.99 03/20/2014912828QX11,000,000.00 UNITED STATES TREASURY1.50 07/31/2016 07/31/20160.000.00-2,674.023,750.00 0.001,075.98 11/06/2014912828SY7500,000.00 UNITED STATES TREASURY0.625 05/31/2017 05/31/20170.000.0081.60486.68 0.00568.29 11/05/2015912828VL11,000,000.00 UNITED STATES TREASURY0.625 07/15/2016 07/15/20160.000.00-674.921,562.50 0.00887.58 06/01/2015912828RF91,000,000.00 UNITED STATES TREASURY1.00 08/31/2016 08/31/20160.000.00-1,421.412,527.47 0.001,106.06 10/31/2014912828RF91,000,000.00 UNITED STATES TREASURY1.00 08/31/2016 08/31/20160.000.00-423.271,016.48 0.00593.21 11/25/2015912828WQ91,000,000.00 UNITED STATES TREASURY0.50 06/30/2016 06/30/20160.000.00-103.381,250.15 0.001,146.77 07/01/2014912828TS91,000,000.00 UNITED STATES TREASURY0.625 09/30/2017 09/30/20170.000.0011.141,144.12 0.001,155.26 10/26/2015912828PS31,000,000.00 UNITED STATES TREASURY2.00 01/31/2016 01/31/20160.000.00-4,222.165,000.00 0.00777.84 07/31/2014912828PS31,000,000.00 UNITED STATES TREASURY2.00 01/31/2016 01/31/20160.000.00-4,183.635,000.00 0.00816.37 12/31/201491412GUT0250,000.00 UNIVERSITY CALIF REVS0.634 05/15/2016 05/15/20160.000.000.00396.25 0.00396.25 04/10/201490331HMR1450,000.00 US BANK NA0.62 01/26/2018 01/26/20180.000.00-115.70697.70 0.00582.00 05/12/201590331HMR1300,000.00 US BANK NA0.62 01/26/2018 01/26/20180.000.000.00465.13 0.00465.13 01/27/201590290XAB3480,000.00 USAOT-151-A20.82 03/15/2018 08/13/20160.000.001.97984.00 0.00985.97 07/29/2015928668AD4500,000.00 VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICAFINANCE LLC0.598 05/23/2016 05/23/20160.000.000.00728.90 0.00728.90 05/23/20149499173971,399,428.32 WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.25 12/31/2015 12/31/20150.000.000.00638.50 0.00638.50 ------44,255,885.01 ------ 10/03/2016 08/04/20160.00486.48-43,826.70103,721.99 -12,488.7247,893.06 ---Income DetailWC-Contra Costa County (19529)Base Currency: USD 10/01/2015 - 12/31/2015Return to Table of ContentsDated: 01/11/201610March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes607 * Weighted By: Ending Base Market Value + Accrued. * Holdings Displayed By: Lot.Income DetailWC-Contra Costa County (19529)Base Currency: USD 10/01/2015 - 12/31/2015Return to Table of ContentsDated: 01/11/201611March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes608 CESTIdentifier DescriptionBase Current Units Market Sector Rating Coupon FinalMaturity,EffectiveMaturityBookYield,YieldBase Original Cost,Base Book ValueBase Net TotalUnrealized Gain/LossMarketPriceBase AccruedBalanceBase Market Value Base Market Value +Accrued949917397 WellsFargo:Htge MM;I1,399,428.32 CashAAA 0.25 12/31/201512/31/20150.000.001,399,428.321,399,428.320.00 1.000.001,399,428.321,399,428.32CCYUSD Receivable225.38 CashAAA 0.00 12/31/201512/31/20150.000.00225.38225.380.00 1.000.00225.38225.38CCYUSD Cash-9.65 CashAAA 0.00 12/31/201512/31/20150.000.00-9.65-9.650.00 1.000.00-9.65-9.65------1,399,644.05 CashAAA --- 12/31/201512/31/20150.000.001,399,644.051,399,644.050.00 1.000.001,399,644.051,399,644.05Identifier DescriptionBase Current Units Market Sector Rating Coupon FinalMaturity,EffectiveMaturityBookYield,YieldBase Original Cost,Base Book ValueBase Net TotalUnrealized Gain/LossMarketPriceBase AccruedBalanceBase Market Value Base Market Value +Accrued912828B82 UNITED STATES TREASURY1,000,000.00 Government AAA 0.25 02/29/201602/29/20160.440.25996,328.13999,695.30226.70 99.992844.78999,922.001,000,766.78459058DM2 INTERNATIONAL BANK FORRECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOP1,000,000.00 Government AAA 0.50 05/16/201605/16/20160.5070.428999,970.00999,975.27201.73 100.018625.001,000,177.001,000,802.003130A4KE1 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS500,000.00 Agency AAA 0.33 04/01/201604/01/20160.3450.466499,923.19499,980.90-178.90 99.96412.50499,802.00500,214.503136FPET0 FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGEASSOCIATION1,000,000.00 Agency AAA 2.00 03/10/201603/10/20160.3260.2261,015,960.001,003,146.40168.60 100.332 6,166.671,003,315.001,009,481.67313384SS9 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS1,000,000.00 Agency A-1+ 0.00 02/05/201602/05/20160.2540.243997,472.22999,756.9421.06 99.9780.00999,778.00999,778.0036962G6Q2 GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORP750,000.00 Financial AA+ 0.918 01/08/201601/08/20160.7120.948753,840.00750,032.11-20.11 100.001 1,625.63750,012.00751,637.63459056HY6 INTERNATIONAL BANK FORRECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOP163,000.00 Government AAA 0.00 02/15/201602/15/20160.510.158162,390.38162,898.7773.19 99.9820.00162,971.96162,971.96459056HY6 INTERNATIONAL BANK FORRECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOP771,000.00 Government AAA 0.00 02/15/201602/15/20160.4510.158768,255.24770,575.55291.84 99.9820.00770,867.39770,867.39605581FW2 MISSISSIPPI ST300,000.00 Municipal AA+ 0.64 10/01/201610/01/20160.640.767300,000.00300,000.00-219.00 99.927480.00299,781.00300,261.0045905U7F5 INTERNATIONAL BK FOR RECON & DEVMEDIUM TERM BK N1,000,000.00 Government AAA 0.45 07/19/201607/19/20160.451.7831,000,000.001,000,000.00-7,300.00 99.27 2,312.50992,700.00995,012.503133EDQW5 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKSFUNDING CORP1,000,000.00 Agency AAA 0.29 01/21/201601/21/20160.380.278998,680.00999,950.9360.07 100.001 1,288.891,000,011.001,001,299.8969349LAH1 PNC BANK,NA750,000.00 Financial A+ 0.80 01/28/201601/28/20160.4390.826751,785.00750,000.00-12.75 99.998 2,550.00749,987.25752,537.25857477AH6 STATE STREET CORP285,000.00 Financial AA- 2.875 03/07/201603/07/20160.610.945291,141.75286,158.16-154.10 100.352 2,594.69286,004.05288,598.74857477AH6 STATE STREET CORP300,000.00 Financial AA- 2.875 03/07/201603/07/20160.5380.945307,059.00301,259.17-202.27 100.352 2,731.25301,056.90303,788.1505531FAG8 BB&T CORP750,000.00 Financial A+ 3.20 03/15/201602/15/20160.6620.973766,320.00752,375.70-324.45 100.273 7,066.67752,051.25759,117.9206406HBX6 BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORP750,000.00 Financial AA- 2.30 07/28/201607/28/20160.6440.831768,750.00757,073.55-724.06 100.846 7,331.25756,349.50763,680.75313384ZK8 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS500,000.00 Agency A-1+ 0.00 07/15/201607/15/20160.6220.588498,263.19498,339.44106.06 99.6890.00498,445.50498,445.503130A3XU3 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS1,000,000.00 Agency A-1+ 0.25 01/22/201601/22/20160.2630.144999,870.00999,992.4265.58 100.005 1,097.221,000,058.001,001,155.223133EFBT3 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKSFUNDING CORP1,000,000.00 Agency AAA 0.42 09/01/201609/01/20160.440.572999,800.00999,866.67-932.67 99.893 1,400.00998,934.001,000,334.0068428LDH4 ORANGE CNTY CALIF PENSION OBLIG300,000.00 Municipal AA 0.68 02/01/201602/01/20160.680.488300,000.00300,000.0045.00 100.015838.67300,045.00300,883.67Balance Sheet ClassificationWC-Contra Costa County (19529)Base Currency: USD As of 12/31/2015Return to Table of ContentsDated: 01/11/201612March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes609 LTIdentifier DescriptionBase Current Units Market Sector Rating Coupon FinalMaturity,EffectiveMaturityBookYield,YieldBase Original Cost,Base Book ValueBase Net TotalUnrealized Gain/LossMarketPriceBase AccruedBalanceBase Market Value Base Market Value +Accrued68428LDH4 ORANGE CNTY CALIF PENSION OBLIG490,000.00 Municipal AA 0.68 02/01/201602/01/20160.680.488490,000.00490,000.0073.50 100.015 1,369.82490,073.50491,443.3203255LGX1 ANAHEIM CALIF PUB FING AUTH LEASEREV750,000.00 Municipal AA- 1.00 05/01/201605/01/20161.000.943750,000.00750,000.00210.00 100.028 1,250.00750,210.00751,460.00912828QX1 UNITED STATES TREASURY1,000,000.00 Government AAA 1.50 07/31/201607/31/20160.4340.6181,018,398.441,006,161.88-1,122.88 100.504 6,277.171,005,039.001,011,316.174197915E4 HAWAII ST750,000.00 Municipal AA 0.731 08/01/201608/01/20160.7310.68750,000.00750,000.00345.00 100.046 2,284.38750,345.00752,629.385446462Q4 LOS ANGELES CALIF UNI SCH DIST400,000.00 Municipal AA 0.486 01/01/201601/01/20160.4860.306400,000.00400,000.000.00 100.00972.00400,000.00400,972.00313373SZ6 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS1,000,000.00 Agency AAA 2.125 06/10/201606/10/20160.500.6471,030,688.001,007,109.02-657.02 100.645 1,239.581,006,452.001,007,691.5889233AHP7 Toyota Motor Credit Corporation500,000.00 Industrial A-1+ 0.592 02/19/201602/19/20160.5920.704500,000.00500,000.00-81.50 99.98330.24499,918.50499,948.743130A3J70 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS1,000,000.00 Agency AAA 0.625 11/23/201611/23/20160.4840.8221,002,130.001,001,254.97-3,213.97 99.804659.72998,041.00998,700.7291412GUT0 UNIVERSITY CALIF REVS250,000.00 Municipal AA 0.634 05/15/201605/15/20160.6340.562250,000.00250,000.0092.50 100.037202.53250,092.50250,295.03097023BC8 BOEING CO750,000.00 Industrial A3.75 11/20/201611/20/20160.8491.008789,135.00769,095.99-1,388.49 102.361 3,203.13767,707.50770,910.6389116EC19 Toronto Dominion Holdings (U.S.A.), Inc.750,000.00 Financial A-1+ 0.00 03/01/201603/01/20160.3810.455749,279.58749,525.00-89.25 99.9250.00749,435.75749,435.75928668AD4 VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICAFINANCE LLC500,000.00 Industrial A- 0.598 05/23/201605/23/20160.6022.706500,000.00500,000.00-3,543.50 99.291323.70496,456.50496,780.20912828VL1 UNITED STATES TREASURY1,000,000.00 Government AAA 0.625 07/15/201607/15/20160.3560.5891,003,007.811,001,437.88-1,359.88 100.008 2,887.231,000,078.001,002,965.233137EACW7 FREDDIE MAC235,000.00 Agency AAA 2.00 08/25/201608/25/20160.8270.706236,903.50236,776.10115.18 100.805 1,645.00236,891.28238,536.283130A2T97 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS1,000,000.00 Agency AAA 0.50 09/28/201609/28/20160.3860.7271,001,080.001,000,838.62-2,593.62 99.825 1,291.67998,245.00999,536.673130A2T97 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS500,000.00 Agency AAA 0.50 09/28/201609/28/20160.4160.727500,415.00500,308.97-1,186.47 99.825645.83499,122.50499,768.33912828PS3 UNITED STATES TREASURY1,000,000.00 Government AAA 2.00 01/31/201601/31/20160.3150.4681,025,195.311,001,376.79-156.79 100.122 8,369.571,001,220.001,009,589.57912828PS3 UNITED STATES TREASURY1,000,000.00 Government AAA 2.00 01/31/201601/31/20160.3350.4681,018,007.811,001,364.23-144.23 100.122 8,369.571,001,220.001,009,589.5714912L4X6 CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICESCORP775,000.00 Industrial A2.05 08/01/201608/01/20160.6431.005793,855.75781,314.90-1,569.57 100.612 6,619.79779,745.32786,365.1276912TJC8 RIVERSIDE CNTY CALIF PUB FINGAUTH TAX ALLOC REV125,000.00 Municipal A1.00 09/01/201609/01/20161.3011.139124,468.75124,753.10155.65 99.927416.67124,908.75125,325.42544587B72 LOS ANGELES CALIF MUN IMPT CORPLEASE REV490,000.00 Municipal A+ 1.26 11/01/201611/01/20161.261.082490,000.00490,000.00837.90 100.171720.30490,837.90491,558.20912828RF9 UNITED STATES TREASURY1,000,000.00 Government AAA 1.00 08/31/201608/31/20160.5790.6771,003,203.131,002,779.86-748.86 100.203 3,379.121,002,031.001,005,410.12912828RF9 UNITED STATES TREASURY1,000,000.00 Government AAA 1.00 08/31/201608/31/20160.4320.6771,010,351.561,003,754.37-1,723.37 100.203 3,379.121,002,031.001,005,410.12912828WQ9 UNITED STATES TREASURY1,000,000.00 Government AAA 0.50 06/30/201606/30/20160.4590.5161,000,820.311,000,203.39-437.39 99.97713.74999,766.00999,779.7446625HHW3 JPMORGAN CHASE & CO750,000.00 Financial A+ 2.60 01/15/201601/15/20160.861.473762,750.00750,497.21-183.71 100.041 8,991.67750,313.50759,305.17------32,134,000.00 ---AA+ --- 05/19/201605/18/20160.5190.68632,375,498.0532,199,629.58-27,179.27 --- 103,907.24 32,172,450.31 32,276,357.55Balance Sheet ClassificationWC-Contra Costa County (19529)Base Currency: USD As of 12/31/2015Return to Table of ContentsDated: 01/11/201613March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes610 SummaryIdentifier DescriptionBase Current Units Market Sector Rating Coupon FinalMaturity,EffectiveMaturityBookYield,YieldBase Original Cost,Base Book ValueBase Net TotalUnrealized Gain/LossMarketPriceBase AccruedBalanceBase Market Value Base Market Value +Accrued58772PAB4 MBART-151-A2A650,000.00 Asset Backed AAA 0.82 06/15/201809/11/20161.0071.161649,085.94649,127.81-619.17 99.771236.89648,508.64648,745.5390331HMR1 US BANK NA450,000.00 Financial AA 0.62 01/26/201801/26/20180.5271.716451,206.00450,911.73-3,106.38 99.512519.17447,805.35448,324.5290331HMR1 US BANK NA300,000.00 Financial AA 0.62 01/26/201801/26/20180.6291.716300,000.00300,000.00-1,463.10 99.512346.11298,536.90298,883.0189236WAB4 TART-15A-A2495,855.46 Asset Backed AAA 0.71 07/17/201704/29/20160.7110.971495,850.75495,853.44-415.84 99.916156.47495,437.60495,594.0717275RAY8 CISCO SYSTEMS INC750,000.00 Industrial AA- 0.822 06/15/201806/15/20180.8341.662750,000.00750,000.00-1,574.25 99.79291.13748,425.75748,716.8806050TLU4 BANK OF AMERICA NA500,000.00 Financial A+ 0.832 02/14/201702/14/20170.8461.724500,000.00500,000.00-799.50 99.84531.30499,200.50499,731.80084664CD1 BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY FINANCECORP750,000.00 Financial AA 0.621 01/12/201801/12/20180.631.588750,000.00750,000.00-1,712.25 99.771 1,034.33748,287.75749,322.0843814KAB7 HONDO-151-A2252,965.61 Asset Backed AAA 0.70 06/15/201704/22/20160.7061.015252,952.41252,960.31-241.23 99.90378.70252,719.07252,797.77762494QV7 RIALTO CALIF UNI SCH DIST250,000.00 Municipal AA 1.258 02/01/201702/01/20171.2581.412250,000.00250,000.00-335.00 99.866 1,310.42249,665.00250,975.4241284BAB2 HARLY-151-A2A319,404.33 Asset Backed AAA 0.80 01/15/201907/22/20160.801.103319,401.74319,402.91-526.65 99.835113.57318,876.26318,989.82161571GJ7 CHAIT 2014-A1 A1775,000.00 Asset Backed AAA 1.15 01/15/201901/14/20171.0221.236776,453.13776,049.33-1,648.56 99.923396.11774,400.77774,796.88912828TS9 UNITED STATES TREASURY1,000,000.00 Government AAA 0.625 09/30/201709/30/20170.6311.047999,882.81999,893.95-6,807.95 99.308 1,588.11993,086.00994,674.1131679KAB6 FTAT-142-A2A86,721.92 Asset Backed AAA 0.45 04/17/201701/29/20160.4561.0086,712.3986,721.21-37.83 99.95617.3486,683.3886,700.7306050TMB5 BANK OF AMERICA NA250,000.00 Financial A+ 0.902 06/05/201706/05/20170.9161.852250,000.00250,000.00-835.50 99.666156.60249,164.50249,321.10912828SY7 UNITED STATES TREASURY500,000.00 Government AAA 0.625 05/31/201705/31/20170.730.959499,179.69499,261.29-1,468.29 99.558273.22497,793.00498,066.2231680GAB2 FTAT-151-A2A500,000.00 Asset Backed AAA 1.02 05/15/201810/10/20161.0241.344499,986.35499,987.82-1,190.17 99.76226.67498,797.65499,024.3247787WAB5 JDOT-15B-A2400,000.00 Asset Backed AAA 0.98 06/15/201811/12/20160.9831.258399,986.52399,989.14-910.78 99.77174.22399,078.36399,252.5890290XAB3 USAOT-151-A2480,000.00 Asset Backed AAA 0.82 03/15/201808/13/20160.8251.08479,982.14479,987.66-727.15 99.846174.93479,260.51479,435.4502665WAY7 AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORP500,000.00 Industrial A+ 1.02 09/20/201709/20/20171.0361.676500,000.00500,000.00-558.00 99.888169.92499,442.00499,611.9241284AAB4 HARLY-141-A2A65,802.65 Asset Backed AAA 0.49 04/15/201803/13/20160.4940.94165,798.2065,801.86-59.12 99.90914.3365,742.7365,757.06191216BR0 COCA-COLA CO300,000.00 Industrial AA 0.875 10/27/201710/27/20170.8971.089299,868.00299,879.92-997.72 99.627466.67298,882.20299,348.8765477WAB2 NART-14B-A2396,490.98 Asset Backed AAA 0.60 06/15/201703/23/20160.6060.901396,469.69396,483.83-265.71 99.931105.73396,218.12396,323.85437076BJ0 HOME DEPOT INC750,000.00 Industrial A 0.882 09/15/201709/15/20170.8961.439750,000.00750,000.001,104.75 100.147312.38751,104.75751,417.13------10,722,240.96 ---AA+ --- 12/29/201704/24/20170.821.32210,722,815.7610,722,312.19-25,195.40 --- 8,694.31 10,697,116.80 10,705,811.11Identifier DescriptionBase Current Units Market Sector Rating Coupon FinalMaturity,EffectiveMaturityBookYield,YieldBase Original Cost,Base Book ValueBase Net TotalUnrealized Gain/LossMarketPriceBase AccruedBalanceBase Market Value Base Market Value +Accrued------44,255,885.01 ---AA+ --- 10/03/201608/04/20160.5750.81744,497,957.8644,321,585.83-52,374.67 --- 112,601.55 44,269,211.16 44,381,812.71Balance Sheet ClassificationWC-Contra Costa County (19529)Base Currency: USD As of 12/31/2015Return to Table of ContentsDated: 01/11/201614March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes611 * Grouped By: BS Class 2. * Groups Sorted By: BS Class 2. * Weighted By: Base Market Value + Accrued.Balance Sheet ClassificationWC-Contra Costa County (19529)Base Currency: USD As of 12/31/2015Return to Table of ContentsDated: 01/11/201615March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes612 * Does not Lock Down.BuyTrade Date,Settle DateTransaction Type Identifier,DescriptionCouponRateFinalMaturityBroker/DealerBase Original Units,Base Current UnitsPrice Purchased Cost,Base PrincipalBase AccruedInterestBase Net TotalRealized GainBaseCommissionBase Amount10/22/201510/27/2015Buy191216BR0COCA-COLA CO0.875 10/27/2017 Citigroup Global Markets (AU)300,000.00300,000.0099.9560.00299,868.000.000.00 0.00-299,868.0010/14/201510/15/2015Buy3130A2T97FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK0.50 09/28/2016 APX Asset1,000,000.001,000,000.00100.1080.001,001,080.00236.110.00 0.00 -1,001,316.1112/22/201512/23/2015Buy313384ZK8FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS0.00 07/15/2016 CastleOak Securities LP500,000.00500,000.0099.6530.00498,263.190.000.00 0.00-498,263.1912/14/201512/15/2015Buy3137EACW7FREDDIE MAC2.00 08/25/2016 CastleOak Securities LP235,000.00235,000.00100.810.00236,903.501,436.110.00 0.00-238,339.6110/28/201511/05/2015Buy31680GAB2FTAT-151-A2A1.02 05/15/2018 CS First Boston (BR)500,000.00500,000.0099.9970.00499,986.350.000.00 0.00-499,986.3511/30/201512/03/2015Buy459058DM2INTL BK RECON & DEVELOP0.50 05/16/2016 CastleOak Securities LP1,000,000.001,000,000.0099.9970.00999,970.00236.110.00 0.00 -1,000,206.1111/04/201511/19/2015Buy544587B72LOS ANGELES CALIF MUN IMPTCORP LEASE REV1.26 11/01/2016 Merrill Lynch & Co. (AE)490,000.00490,000.00100.000.00490,000.000.000.00 0.00-490,000.0012/03/201512/08/2015Buy58772PAB4MBART-151-A2A0.82 06/15/2018 Deutsche Bank650,000.00650,000.0099.8590.00649,085.94340.530.00 0.00-649,426.4712/01/201512/01/2015Buy89116EC19Toronto Dominion Holdings(U.S.A.), Inc.0.00 03/01/2016 TORONTO DOMINION BK750,000.00750,000.0099.9040.00749,279.580.000.00 0.00-749,279.5811/25/201511/25/2015Buy912828RF9US TREASURY N/B1.00 08/31/2016 Goldman Sachs & Co. (AU)1,000,000.001,000,000.00100.320.001,003,203.132,362.640.00 0.00 -1,005,565.7711/04/201511/05/2015Buy912828SY7US TREASURY N/B0.625 05/31/2017 BARCLAYS CAPITAL INC.500,000.00500,000.0099.8360.00499,179.691,349.040.00 0.00-500,528.7310/23/201510/26/2015Buy912828TS9US TREASURY N/B0.625 09/30/2017 Bank of Montreal, Primary Broker1,000,000.001,000,000.0099.9880.00999,882.81443.990.00 0.00 -1,000,326.8010/01/201510/01/2015Buy949917397WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I0.06 12/31/2015 Direct772,204.47772,204.471.00772,204.47772,204.470.000.00 0.00-772,204.4710/08/201510/08/2015Buy949917397WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I0.06 12/31/2015 Direct1,694.811,694.811.001,694.811,694.810.000.00 0.00-1,694.8110/12/201510/15/2015Buy949917397WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I0.06 12/31/2015 Direct1,003,350.001,003,350.001.00 1,003,350.001,003,350.000.000.00 0.00 -1,003,350.0010/16/201510/16/2015Buy949917397WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I0.06 12/31/2015 Direct17,661.0817,661.081.0017,661.0817,661.080.000.00 0.00-17,661.0810/16/201510/16/2015Buy949917397WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I0.06 12/31/2015 Direct16,205.7416,205.741.0016,205.7416,205.740.000.00 0.00-16,205.7410/15/201510/15/2015Buy949917397WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I0.06 12/31/2015 Direct54,268.5254,268.521.0054,268.5254,268.520.000.00 0.00-54,268.5210/15/201510/15/2015Buy949917397WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I0.06 12/31/2015 Direct115,937.81115,937.811.00115,937.81115,937.810.000.00 0.00-115,937.8110/13/201510/13/2015Buy949917397WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I0.06 12/31/2015 Direct1,123.171,123.171.001,123.171,123.170.000.00 0.00-1,123.1710/19/201510/19/2015Buy949917397WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I0.06 12/31/2015 Direct1,200,000.001,200,000.001.00 1,200,000.001,200,000.000.000.00 0.00 -1,200,000.0010/19/201510/19/2015Buy949917397WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I0.06 12/31/2015 Direct18,231.6018,231.601.0018,231.6018,231.600.000.00 0.00-18,231.6010/23/201510/23/2015Buy949917397WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I0.06 12/31/2015 Direct296.67296.671.00296.67296.670.000.00 0.00-296.6710/28/201510/28/2015Buy949917397WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I0.06 12/31/2015 Direct151.79151.791.00151.79151.790.000.00 0.00-151.7910/26/201510/26/2015Buy949917397WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I0.06 12/31/2015 Direct1,128.211,128.211.001,128.211,128.210.000.00 0.00-1,128.2111/04/201511/04/2015Buy949917397WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I0.08 12/31/2015 Direct1,001,250.001,001,250.001.00 1,001,250.001,001,250.000.000.00 0.00 -1,001,250.0011/02/201511/02/2015Buy949917397WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I0.08 12/31/2015 Direct3,938.673,938.671.003,938.673,938.670.000.00 0.00-3,938.67Trading ActivityWC-Contra Costa County (19529)Base Currency: USD 10/01/2015 - 12/31/2015Return to Table of ContentsDated: 01/11/201616March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes613 Trade Date,Settle DateTransaction Type Identifier,DescriptionCouponRateFinalMaturityBroker/DealerBase Original Units,Base Current UnitsPrice Purchased Cost,Base PrincipalBase AccruedInterestBase Net TotalRealized GainBaseCommissionBase Amount11/13/201511/13/2015Buy949917397WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I0.08 12/31/2015 Direct51,102.6751,102.671.0051,102.6751,102.670.000.00 0.00-51,102.6711/17/201511/17/2015Buy949917397WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I0.08 12/31/2015 Direct775,976.46775,976.461.00775,976.46775,976.460.000.00 0.00-775,976.4611/16/201511/16/2015Buy949917397WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I0.08 12/31/2015 Direct759,073.60759,073.601.00759,073.60759,073.600.000.00 0.00-759,073.6011/16/201511/16/2015Buy949917397WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I0.08 12/31/2015 Direct71,553.4771,553.471.0071,553.4771,553.470.000.00 0.00-71,553.4711/16/201511/16/2015Buy949917397WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I0.08 12/31/2015 Direct126,735.24126,735.241.00126,735.24126,735.240.000.00 0.00-126,735.2411/20/201511/20/2015Buy949917397WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I0.08 12/31/2015 Direct9,913.589,913.581.009,913.589,913.580.000.00 0.00-9,913.5811/19/201511/19/2015Buy949917397WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I0.08 12/31/2015 Direct260,693.39260,693.391.00260,693.39260,693.390.000.00 0.00-260,693.3911/18/201511/18/2015Buy949917397WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I0.08 12/31/2015 Direct17,151.9617,151.961.0017,151.9617,151.960.000.00 0.00-17,151.9611/24/201511/24/2015Buy949917397WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I0.08 12/31/2015 Direct14,560.3614,560.361.0014,560.3614,560.360.000.00 0.00-14,560.3611/23/201511/23/2015Buy949917397WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I0.08 12/31/2015 Direct3,125.003,125.001.003,125.003,125.000.000.00 0.00-3,125.0011/23/201511/23/2015Buy949917397WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I0.08 12/31/2015 Direct695.00695.001.00695.00695.000.000.00 0.00-695.0012/02/201512/02/2015Buy949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.25 12/31/2015 Direct166.63166.631.00166.63166.630.000.00 0.00-166.6312/01/201512/01/2015Buy949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.25 12/31/2015 Direct225.31225.311.00225.31225.310.000.00 0.00-225.3111/30/201511/30/2015Buy949917397WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I0.08 12/31/2015 Direct1,562.501,562.501.001,562.501,562.500.000.00 0.00-1,562.5012/07/201512/07/2015Buy949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.25 12/31/2015 Direct488.75488.751.00488.75488.750.000.00 0.00-488.7512/11/201512/11/2015Buy949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.25 12/31/2015 Direct251,250.00251,250.001.00251,250.00251,250.000.000.00 0.00-251,250.0012/10/201512/10/2015Buy949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.25 12/31/2015 Direct10,625.0010,625.001.0010,625.0010,625.000.000.00 0.00-10,625.0012/15/201512/15/2015Buy949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.25 12/31/2015 Direct159.11159.111.00159.11159.110.000.00 0.00-159.1112/15/201512/15/2015Buy949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.25 12/31/2015 Direct2.892.891.002.892.890.000.00 0.00-2.8912/15/201512/15/2015Buy949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.25 12/31/2015 Direct425.00425.001.00425.00425.000.000.00 0.00-425.0012/18/201512/18/2015Buy949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.25 12/31/2015 Direct11,005.6911,005.691.0011,005.6911,005.690.000.00 0.00-11,005.6912/18/201512/18/2015Buy949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.25 12/31/2015 Direct3.583.581.003.583.580.000.00 0.00-3.5812/17/201512/17/2015Buy949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.25 12/31/2015 Direct14.7314.731.0014.7314.730.000.00 0.00-14.7312/16/201512/16/2015Buy949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.25 12/31/2015 Direct7,710.687,710.681.007,710.687,710.680.000.00 0.00-7,710.6812/16/201512/16/2015Buy949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.25 12/31/2015 Direct326.67326.671.00326.67326.670.000.00 0.00-326.6712/21/201512/21/2015Buy949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.25 12/31/2015 Direct949.06949.061.00949.06949.060.000.00 0.00-949.0612/31/201512/31/2015Buy949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.25 12/31/2015 Direct2,500.002,500.001.002,500.002,500.000.000.00 0.00-2,500.0012/29/201512/29/2015Buy949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.25 12/31/2015 Direct162.22162.221.00162.22162.220.000.00 0.00-162.22------Buy--------- ------14,510,601.0914,510,601.09--- 6,585,601.0914,512,303.286,404.530.00 0.00 -14,518,707.81Trading ActivityWC-Contra Costa County (19529)Base Currency: USD 10/01/2015 - 12/31/2015Return to Table of ContentsDated: 01/11/201617March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes614 Call RedemptionMaturityPrincipal PaydownTrade Date,Settle DateTransaction Type Identifier,DescriptionCouponRateFinalMaturityBroker/DealerBase Original Units,Base Current UnitsPrice Purchased Cost,Base PrincipalBase AccruedInterestBase Net TotalRealized GainBaseCommissionBase Amount10/19/201510/19/2015Call Redemption 3133EDGM8FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK0.35 03/10/2016 Redemption-1,000,000.00-1,000,000.00100.000.00-1,000,000.00-379.17415.68 0.00 1,000,379.1710/19/201510/19/2015Call Redemption 3133EDGM8FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK0.35 03/10/2016 Redemption-200,000.00-200,000.00100.000.00-200,000.00-75.8370.81 0.00200,075.8310/01/201510/01/2015Call Redemption 677520FR4OH ST-TXB-DEV ASST-A5.39 10/01/2015 Redemption-750,000.00-750,000.00100.000.00-750,000.000.000.00 0.00750,000.00------Call Redemption --------- ---Redemption-1,950,000.00-1,950,000.00100.000.00-1,950,000.00-455.00486.49 0.00 1,950,455.00Trade Date,Settle DateTransaction Type Identifier,DescriptionCouponRateFinalMaturityBroker/DealerBase Original Units,Base Current UnitsPrice Purchased Cost,Base PrincipalBase AccruedInterestBase Net TotalRealized GainBaseCommissionBase Amount11/04/201511/04/2015Maturity3133EDGC0FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK0.25 11/04/2015 Maturity-1,000,000.00-1,000,000.00100.000.00-1,000,000.000.000.00 0.00 1,000,000.0011/16/201511/16/2015Maturity69371RK96PACCAR FINANCIAL CORP0.70 11/16/2015 Maturity-205,000.00-205,000.00100.000.00-205,000.000.000.00 0.00205,000.0011/16/201511/16/2015Maturity69371RK96PACCAR FINANCIAL CORP0.70 11/16/2015 Maturity-500,000.00-500,000.00100.000.00-500,000.000.000.00 0.00500,000.0012/11/201512/11/2015Maturity74256LAC3PRINCIPAL LIFE GLOBALFUNDING II1.00 12/11/2015 Maturity-250,000.00-250,000.00100.000.00-250,000.000.000.00 0.00250,000.0011/17/201511/17/2015Maturity89116FYH7Toronto Dominion Holdings(U.S.A.), Inc.0.00 11/17/2015 Maturity-350,000.00-350,000.00100.000.00-350,000.000.000.00 0.00350,000.0011/17/201511/17/2015Maturity89116FYH7Toronto Dominion Holdings(U.S.A.), Inc.0.00 11/17/2015 Maturity-350,000.00-350,000.00100.000.00-350,000.000.000.00 0.00350,000.00------Maturity--------- ---Maturity-2,655,000.00-2,655,000.00100.000.00-2,655,000.000.000.00 0.00 2,655,000.00Trade Date,Settle DateTransaction Type Identifier,DescriptionCouponRateFinalMaturityBroker/DealerBase Original Units,Base Current UnitsPrice Purchased Cost,Base PrincipalBase AccruedInterestBase Net TotalRealized GainBaseCommissionBase Amount12/15/201512/15/2015Principal Paydown 31679KAB6FTAT-142-A2A0.45 04/17/2017 Direct0.00-46,747.54---0.00-46,747.540.000.00 0.0046,747.5411/15/201511/15/2015Principal Paydown 31679KAB6FITAT 2014-2 A2A0.45 04/17/2017 Direct0.00-52,040.59---0.00-52,040.600.000.01 0.0052,040.6010/15/201510/15/2015Principal Paydown 31679KAB6FITAT 2014-2 A2A0.45 04/17/2017 Direct0.00-54,128.63---0.00-54,128.630.00-0.00 0.0054,128.6311/23/201511/23/2015Principal Paydown 36164EAB1GEET 2015-1 A20.89 11/24/2017 Direct0.00-14,263.69---0.00-14,263.690.00-0.00 0.0014,263.6912/23/201512/23/2015Principal Paydown 36164EAB1GEETT-151-A20.89 11/24/2017 Direct0.00-385,736.31---0.00-385,736.310.000.00 0.00385,736.3110/15/201510/15/2015Principal Paydown 41284AAB4HDMOT 2014-1 A2A0.49 04/15/2018 Direct0.00-15,769.59---0.00-15,769.590.00-0.00 0.0015,769.5912/15/201512/15/2015Principal Paydown 41284AAB4HARLY-141-A2A0.49 04/15/2018 Direct0.00-12,011.13---0.00-12,011.120.00-0.01 0.0012,011.1211/15/201511/15/2015Principal Paydown 41284AAB4HDMOT 2014-1 A2A0.49 04/15/2018 Direct0.00-14,514.84---0.00-14,514.840.000.00 0.0014,514.8412/15/201512/15/2015Principal Paydown 41284BAB2HARLY-151-A2A0.80 01/15/2019 Direct0.00-23,880.19---0.00-23,880.190.000.00 0.0023,880.1911/15/201511/15/2015Principal Paydown 41284BAB2HDMOT 2015-1 A2A0.80 01/15/2019 Direct0.00-27,845.66---0.00-27,845.660.000.00 0.0027,845.6610/15/201510/15/2015Principal Paydown 41284BAB2HDMOT 2015-1 A2A0.80 01/15/2019 Direct0.00-28,616.89---0.00-28,616.890.000.00 0.0028,616.89Trading ActivityWC-Contra Costa County (19529)Base Currency: USD 10/01/2015 - 12/31/2015Return to Table of ContentsDated: 01/11/201618March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes615 SellTrade Date,Settle DateTransaction Type Identifier,DescriptionCouponRateFinalMaturityBroker/DealerBase Original Units,Base Current UnitsPrice Purchased Cost,Base PrincipalBase AccruedInterestBase Net TotalRealized GainBaseCommissionBase Amount12/18/201512/18/2015Principal Paydown 43814GAB6HONDO-142-A20.39 09/19/2016 Direct0.00-11,005.70---0.00-11,005.690.00-0.01 0.0011,005.6911/18/201511/18/2015Principal Paydown 43814GAB6HAROT 2014-2 A20.39 09/19/2016 Direct0.00-17,142.80---0.00-17,142.810.000.01 0.0017,142.8110/18/201510/18/2015Principal Paydown 43814GAB6HAROT 2014-2 A20.39 09/19/2016 Direct0.00-17,372.50---0.00-17,372.500.000.00 0.0017,372.5012/15/201512/15/2015Principal Paydown 43814KAB7HONDO-151-A20.70 06/15/2017 Direct0.00-31,369.24---0.00-31,369.240.00-0.00 0.0031,369.2411/15/201511/15/2015Principal Paydown 43814KAB7HAROT 2015-1 A20.70 06/15/2017 Direct0.00-33,004.06---0.00-33,004.060.00-0.00 0.0033,004.0610/15/201510/15/2015Principal Paydown 43814KAB7HAROT 2015-1 A20.70 06/15/2017 Direct0.00-17,661.08---0.00-17,661.080.000.00 0.0017,661.0810/15/201510/15/2015Principal Paydown 47787VAB7JDOT 2014-A A20.45 09/15/2016 Direct0.00-51,102.67---0.00-51,102.670.00-0.00 0.0051,102.6711/15/201511/15/2015Principal Paydown 47787VAB7JDOT 2014-A A20.45 09/15/2016 Direct0.00-74,594.22---0.00-74,594.210.00-0.01 0.0074,594.2112/15/201512/15/2015Principal Paydown 47787VAB7JDOT-14-A20.45 09/15/2016 Direct0.00-7,710.69---0.00-7,710.690.000.00 0.007,710.6910/15/201510/15/2015Principal Paydown 58768EAC3MBALT 2014-A A2A0.48 06/15/2016 Direct0.00-15,632.82---0.00-15,632.820.00-0.00 0.0015,632.8212/15/201512/15/2015Principal Paydown 65477WAB2NART-14B-A20.60 06/15/2017 Direct0.00-63,615.73---0.00-63,615.730.000.00 0.0063,615.7310/15/201510/15/2015Principal Paydown 65477WAB2NAROT 2014-B A20.60 06/15/2017 Direct0.00-71,114.11---0.00-71,114.110.00-0.00 0.0071,114.1111/15/201511/15/2015Principal Paydown 65477WAB2NAROT 2014-B A20.60 06/15/2017 Direct0.00-71,287.77---0.00-71,287.770.000.00 0.0071,287.7711/18/201511/18/2015Principal Paydown 70659PAE1PENAR 2013-1A A10.589 11/18/2017 Direct0.00-750,000.00---0.00-750,000.000.000.00 0.00750,000.0012/15/201512/15/2015Principal Paydown 89236WAB4TART-15A-A20.71 07/17/2017 Direct0.00-55,774.07---0.00-55,774.070.00-0.00 0.0055,774.0711/15/201511/15/2015Principal Paydown 89236WAB4TAOT 2015-A A20.71 07/17/2017 Direct0.00-48,370.47---0.00-48,370.470.000.00 0.0048,370.47------Principal Paydown --------- ---Direct0.00-2,012,312.98---0.00-2,012,312.980.00-0.00 0.00 2,012,312.98Trade Date,Settle DateTransaction Type Identifier,DescriptionCouponRateFinalMaturityBroker/DealerBase Original Units,Base Current UnitsPrice Purchased Cost,Base PrincipalBase AccruedInterestBase Net TotalRealized GainBaseCommissionBase Amount10/14/201510/14/2015Sell3133EDXG2FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK0.67 10/14/2016 Not Provided-1,000,000.00-1,000,000.00100.000.00-1,000,000.000.000.00 0.00 1,000,000.0010/15/201510/15/2015Sell949917397WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I0.06 12/31/2015 Direct-999,694.98-999,694.981.00-999,694.98-999,694.980.000.00 0.00999,694.9810/20/201510/20/2015Sell949917397WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I0.06 12/31/2015 Direct-4,250.38-4,250.381.00-4,250.38-4,250.380.000.00 0.004,250.3810/27/201510/27/2015Sell949917397WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I0.06 12/31/2015 Direct-299,868.00-299,868.001.00-299,868.00-299,868.000.000.00 0.00299,868.0010/26/201510/26/2015Sell949917397WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I0.06 12/31/2015 Direct-1,000,326.80-1,000,326.801.00 -1,000,326.80-1,000,326.800.000.00 0.00 1,000,326.8011/05/201511/05/2015Sell949917397WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I0.08 12/31/2015 Direct-1,000,515.08-1,000,515.081.00 -1,000,515.08-1,000,515.080.000.00 0.00 1,000,515.0811/25/201511/25/2015Sell949917397WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I0.08 12/31/2015 Direct-1,005,565.77-1,005,565.771.00 -1,005,565.77-1,005,565.770.000.00 0.00 1,005,565.7712/03/201512/03/2015Sell949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.25 12/31/2015 Direct-1,000,206.11-1,000,206.111.00 -1,000,206.11-1,000,206.110.000.00 0.00 1,000,206.1112/01/201512/01/2015Sell949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.25 12/31/2015 Direct-749,279.58-749,279.581.00-749,279.58-749,279.580.000.00 0.00749,279.5812/08/201512/08/2015Sell949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.25 12/31/2015 Direct-649,426.47-649,426.471.00-649,426.47-649,426.470.000.00 0.00649,426.47Trading ActivityWC-Contra Costa County (19529)Base Currency: USD 10/01/2015 - 12/31/2015Return to Table of ContentsDated: 01/11/201619March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes616 Summary* Grouped By: Transaction Type. * Groups Sorted By: Transaction Type. * Showing transactions with Trade Date within selected date range. * MMF transactions are expanded. * The Transaction Detail/Trading Activity reports provide our most up-to-date transactional details. As such, these reports are subject to change even after the other reports on the website have been locked down. While these reports can be useful tools in understanding recent activity,due to their dynamic nature we do not recommend using them for booking journal entries or reconciliation.Trade Date,Settle DateTransaction Type Identifier,DescriptionCouponRateFinalMaturityBroker/DealerBase Original Units,Base Current UnitsPrice Purchased Cost,Base PrincipalBase AccruedInterestBase Net TotalRealized GainBaseCommissionBase Amount12/23/201512/23/2015Sell949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.25 12/31/2015 Direct-112,240.79-112,240.791.00-112,240.79-112,240.790.000.00 0.00112,240.7912/21/201512/21/2015Sell949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.25 12/31/2015 Direct-4,089.42-4,089.421.00-4,089.42-4,089.420.000.00 0.004,089.42------Sell--------- -------7,825,463.38-7,825,463.38--- -6,825,463.38-7,825,463.380.000.00 0.00 7,825,463.38Trade Date,Settle DateTransaction Type Identifier,DescriptionCouponRateFinalMaturityBroker/DealerBase Original Units,Base Current UnitsPrice Purchased Cost,Base PrincipalBase AccruedInterestBase Net TotalRealized GainBaseCommissionBase Amount------------------ ------2,080,137.7167,824.73----239,862.2969,526.925,949.53486.48 0.00-75,476.45Trading ActivityWC-Contra Costa County (19529)Base Currency: USD 10/01/2015 - 12/31/2015Return to Table of ContentsDated: 01/11/201620March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes617 * Does not Lock Down.ReceivableSettledEntry Date Settle Date Transaction TypeBase Current Units IdentifierDescriptionCouponRateFinal MaturityPriceBase Amount12/31/2015 12/31/2015 Money Market Funds0.00 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.25 12/31/2015---225.3812/31/2015 12/31/2015 Money Market Funds0.00 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.25 12/31/2015---225.38Entry Date Settle Date Transaction TypeBase Current Units IdentifierDescriptionCouponRateFinal MaturityPriceBase Amount12/20/2015 12/20/2015 Coupon0.00 02665WAY7AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORP1.02 09/20/2017---949.0611/01/2015 11/01/2015 Coupon0.00 03255LGX1ANAHEIM FING AUTH-B1.00 05/01/2016---3,750.0011/16/2015 11/16/2015 Coupon0.00 06050TLU4BANK OF AMERICA NA0.832 02/14/2017---1,017.4212/07/2015 12/07/2015 Coupon0.00 06050TMB5BANK OF AMERICA NA0.902 06/05/2017---488.7510/13/2015 10/13/2015 Coupon0.00 084664CD1BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY FIN0.621 01/12/2018---1,123.1711/20/2015 11/20/2015 Coupon0.00 097023BC8BOEING CO3.75 11/20/2016---14,062.5012/15/2015 12/15/2015 Coupon0.00 161571GJ7CHAIT 2014-A1 A11.15 01/15/2019---742.7110/15/2015 10/15/2015 Coupon0.00 161571GJ7CHAIT 2014-A1 A11.15 01/15/2019---742.7111/15/2015 11/15/2015 Coupon0.00 161571GJ7CHAIT 2014-A1 A11.15 01/15/2019---742.7112/15/2015 12/15/2015 Coupon0.00 17275RAY8CISCO SYSTEMS INC0.822 06/15/2018---1,226.9810/22/2015 10/27/2015 Buy300,000.00 191216BR0COCA-COLA CO0.875 10/27/201799.956-299,868.0010/14/2015 10/15/2015 Buy1,000,000.00 3130A2T97FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK0.50 09/28/2016100.108-1,001,316.1111/23/2015 11/23/2015 Coupon0.00 3130A3J70FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK0.625 11/23/2016---3,125.0010/01/2015 10/01/2015 Coupon0.00 3130A4KE1FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK0.33 04/01/2016---925.8312/10/2015 12/10/2015 Coupon0.00 313373SZ6FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS2.125 06/10/2016---10,625.0012/22/2015 12/23/2015 Buy500,000.00 313384ZK8FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS0.00 07/15/201699.653-498,263.1911/04/2015 11/04/2015 Coupon0.00 3133EDGC0FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK0.25 11/04/2015---1,250.0011/04/2015 11/04/2015 Maturity-1,000,000.00 3133EDGC0FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK0.25 11/04/2015100.001,000,000.0010/19/2015 10/19/2015 Call Redemption-1,000,000.00 3133EDGM8FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK0.35 03/10/2016100.001,000,379.1710/19/2015 10/19/2015 Call Redemption-200,000.00 3133EDGM8FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK0.35 03/10/2016100.00200,075.8310/14/2015 10/14/2015 Sell-1,000,000.00 3133EDXG2FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK0.67 10/14/2016100.001,000,000.0010/14/2015 10/14/2015 Coupon0.00 3133EDXG2FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK0.67 10/14/2016---3,350.0012/14/2015 12/15/2015 Buy235,000.00 3137EACW7FREDDIE MAC2.00 08/25/2016100.81-238,339.6112/15/2015 12/15/2015 Coupon0.00 31679KAB6FTAT-142-A2A0.45 04/17/2017---50.0512/15/2015 12/15/2015 Principal Paydown-46,747.54 31679KAB6FTAT-142-A2A0.45 04/17/2017---46,747.5411/15/2015 11/15/2015 Coupon0.00 31679KAB6FITAT 2014-2 A2A0.45 04/17/2017---69.5711/15/2015 11/15/2015 Principal Paydown-52,040.59 31679KAB6FITAT 2014-2 A2A0.45 04/17/2017---52,040.6010/15/2015 10/15/2015 Coupon0.00 31679KAB6FITAT 2014-2 A2A0.45 04/17/2017---89.8610/15/2015 10/15/2015 Principal Paydown-54,128.63 31679KAB6FITAT 2014-2 A2A0.45 04/17/2017---54,128.6311/15/2015 11/15/2015 Coupon0.00 31680GAB2FTAT-151-A2A1.02 05/15/2018---141.6712/15/2015 12/15/2015 Coupon0.00 31680GAB2FTAT-151-A2A1.02 05/15/2018---425.0010/28/2015 11/05/2015 Buy500,000.00 31680GAB2FTAT-151-A2A1.02 05/15/201899.997-499,986.3511/23/2015 11/23/2015 Coupon0.00 36164EAB1GEET 2015-1 A20.89 11/24/2017---296.6711/23/2015 11/23/2015 Principal Paydown-14,263.69 36164EAB1GEET 2015-1 A20.89 11/24/2017---14,263.6910/23/2015 10/23/2015 Coupon0.00 36164EAB1GEET 2015-1 A20.89 11/24/2017---296.6712/23/2015 12/23/2015 Principal Paydown-385,736.31 36164EAB1GEETT-151-A20.89 11/24/2017---385,736.3112/23/2015 12/23/2015 Coupon0.00 36164EAB1GEETT-151-A20.89 11/24/2017---286.0910/08/2015 10/08/2015 Coupon0.00 36962G6Q2GENERAL ELEC CAP CORP0.918 01/08/2016---1,694.8110/15/2015 10/15/2015 Coupon0.00 41284AAB4HDMOT 2014-1 A2A0.49 04/15/2018---44.1410/15/2015 10/15/2015 Principal Paydown-15,769.59 41284AAB4HDMOT 2014-1 A2A0.49 04/15/2018---15,769.59Transaction DetailWC-Contra Costa County (19529)Base Currency: USD 10/01/2015 - 12/31/2015Return to Table of ContentsDated: 01/11/201621March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes618 Entry Date Settle Date Transaction TypeBase Current Units IdentifierDescriptionCouponRateFinal MaturityPriceBase Amount12/15/2015 12/15/2015 Coupon0.00 41284AAB4HARLY-141-A2A0.49 04/15/2018---31.7712/15/2015 12/15/2015 Principal Paydown-12,011.13 41284AAB4HARLY-141-A2A0.49 04/15/2018---12,011.1211/15/2015 11/15/2015 Coupon0.00 41284AAB4HDMOT 2014-1 A2A0.49 04/15/2018---37.7011/15/2015 11/15/2015 Principal Paydown-14,514.84 41284AAB4HDMOT 2014-1 A2A0.49 04/15/2018---14,514.8412/15/2015 12/15/2015 Coupon0.00 41284BAB2HARLY-151-A2A0.80 01/15/2019---228.8612/15/2015 12/15/2015 Principal Paydown-23,880.19 41284BAB2HARLY-151-A2A0.80 01/15/2019---23,880.1911/15/2015 11/15/2015 Coupon0.00 41284BAB2HDMOT 2015-1 A2A0.80 01/15/2019---247.4211/15/2015 11/15/2015 Principal Paydown-27,845.66 41284BAB2HDMOT 2015-1 A2A0.80 01/15/2019---27,845.6610/15/2015 10/15/2015 Coupon0.00 41284BAB2HDMOT 2015-1 A2A0.80 01/15/2019---266.5010/15/2015 10/15/2015 Principal Paydown-28,616.89 41284BAB2HDMOT 2015-1 A2A0.80 01/15/2019---28,616.8912/15/2015 12/15/2015 Coupon0.00 437076BJ0HOME DEPOT INC0.882 09/15/2017---1,340.7312/18/2015 12/18/2015 Principal Paydown-11,005.70 43814GAB6HONDO-142-A20.39 09/19/2016---11,005.6912/18/2015 12/18/2015 Coupon0.00 43814GAB6HONDO-142-A20.39 09/19/2016---3.5811/18/2015 11/18/2015 Principal Paydown-17,142.80 43814GAB6HAROT 2014-2 A20.39 09/19/2016---17,142.8111/18/2015 11/18/2015 Coupon0.00 43814GAB6HAROT 2014-2 A20.39 09/19/2016---9.1510/18/2015 10/18/2015 Coupon0.00 43814GAB6HAROT 2014-2 A20.39 09/19/2016---14.7910/18/2015 10/18/2015 Principal Paydown-17,372.50 43814GAB6HAROT 2014-2 A20.39 09/19/2016---17,372.5012/15/2015 12/15/2015 Coupon0.00 43814KAB7HONDO-151-A20.70 06/15/2017---165.8612/15/2015 12/15/2015 Principal Paydown-31,369.24 43814KAB7HONDO-151-A20.70 06/15/2017---31,369.2411/15/2015 11/15/2015 Coupon0.00 43814KAB7HAROT 2015-1 A20.70 06/15/2017---185.1111/15/2015 11/15/2015 Principal Paydown-33,004.06 43814KAB7HAROT 2015-1 A20.70 06/15/2017---33,004.0610/15/2015 10/15/2015 Principal Paydown-17,661.08 43814KAB7HAROT 2015-1 A20.70 06/15/2017---17,661.0810/15/2015 10/15/2015 Coupon0.00 43814KAB7HAROT 2015-1 A20.70 06/15/2017---195.4211/30/2015 12/03/2015 Buy1,000,000.00 459058DM2INTL BK RECON & DEVELOP0.50 05/16/201699.997-1,000,206.1110/15/2015 10/15/2015 Coupon0.00 47787VAB7JDOT 2014-A A20.45 09/15/2016---50.0310/15/2015 10/15/2015 Principal Paydown-51,102.67 47787VAB7JDOT 2014-A A20.45 09/15/2016---51,102.6711/15/2015 11/15/2015 Principal Paydown-74,594.22 47787VAB7JDOT 2014-A A20.45 09/15/2016---74,594.2111/15/2015 11/15/2015 Coupon0.00 47787VAB7JDOT 2014-A A20.45 09/15/2016---30.8612/15/2015 12/15/2015 Coupon0.00 47787VAB7JDOT-14-A20.45 09/15/2016---2.8912/15/2015 12/15/2015 Principal Paydown-7,710.69 47787VAB7JDOT-14-A20.45 09/15/2016---7,710.6912/15/2015 12/15/2015 Coupon0.00 47787WAB5JDOT-15B-A20.98 06/15/2018---326.6710/15/2015 10/15/2015 Coupon0.00 47787WAB5JDOT 2015-B A20.98 06/15/2018---392.0011/15/2015 11/15/2015 Coupon0.00 47787WAB5JDOT 2015-B A20.98 06/15/2018---326.6711/04/2015 11/19/2015 Buy490,000.00 544587B72LOS ANGELES CALIF MUN IMPT CORP LEASEREV1.26 11/01/2016100.00-490,000.0010/15/2015 10/15/2015 Coupon0.00 58768EAC3MBALT 2014-A A2A0.48 06/15/2016---6.2510/15/2015 10/15/2015 Principal Paydown-15,632.82 58768EAC3MBALT 2014-A A2A0.48 06/15/2016---15,632.8212/03/2015 12/08/2015 Buy650,000.00 58772PAB4MBART-151-A2A0.82 06/15/201899.859-649,426.4712/15/2015 12/15/2015 Coupon0.00 58772PAB4MBART-151-A2A0.82 06/15/2018---444.1710/01/2015 10/01/2015 Coupon0.00 605581FW2MISSISSIPPI ST-B-TXBL0.64 10/01/2016---960.0012/15/2015 12/15/2015 Coupon0.00 65477WAB2NART-14B-A20.60 06/15/2017---230.0512/15/2015 12/15/2015 Principal Paydown-63,615.73 65477WAB2NART-14B-A20.60 06/15/2017---63,615.7310/15/2015 10/15/2015 Principal Paydown-71,114.11 65477WAB2NAROT 2014-B A20.60 06/15/2017---71,114.1110/15/2015 10/15/2015 Coupon0.00 65477WAB2NAROT 2014-B A20.60 06/15/2017---301.2511/15/2015 11/15/2015 Coupon0.00 65477WAB2NAROT 2014-B A20.60 06/15/2017---265.7011/15/2015 11/15/2015 Principal Paydown-71,287.77 65477WAB2NAROT 2014-B A20.60 06/15/2017---71,287.7710/01/2015 10/01/2015 Coupon0.00 677520FR4OH ST-TXB-DEV ASST-A5.39 10/01/2015---20,212.5010/01/2015 10/01/2015 Call Redemption-750,000.00 677520FR4OH ST-TXB-DEV ASST-A5.39 10/01/2015100.00750,000.0011/16/2015 11/16/2015 Coupon0.00 69371RK96PACCAR FINANCIAL CORP0.70 11/16/2015---2,467.5011/16/2015 11/16/2015 Maturity-205,000.00 69371RK96PACCAR FINANCIAL CORP0.70 11/16/2015100.00205,000.00Transaction DetailWC-Contra Costa County (19529)Base Currency: USD 10/01/2015 - 12/31/2015Return to Table of ContentsDated: 01/11/201622March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes619 Entry Date Settle Date Transaction TypeBase Current Units IdentifierDescriptionCouponRateFinal MaturityPriceBase Amount11/16/2015 11/16/2015 Maturity-500,000.00 69371RK96PACCAR FINANCIAL CORP0.70 11/16/2015100.00500,000.0011/18/2015 11/18/2015 Coupon0.00 70659PAE1PENAR 2013-1A A10.589 11/18/2017---366.7211/18/2015 11/18/2015 Principal Paydown-750,000.00 70659PAE1PENAR 2013-1A A10.589 11/18/2017---750,000.0010/19/2015 10/19/2015 Coupon0.00 70659PAE1PENAR 2013-1A A10.587 11/18/2017---389.3112/11/2015 12/11/2015 Coupon0.00 74256LAC3PRINCIPAL LIFE GLOBAL FUNDING II1.00 12/11/2015---1,250.0012/11/2015 12/11/2015 Maturity-250,000.00 74256LAC3PRINCIPAL LIFE GLOBAL FUNDING II1.00 12/11/2015100.00250,000.0012/01/2015 12/01/2015 Buy750,000.00 89116EC19Toronto Dominion Holdings (U.S.A.), Inc.0.00 03/01/201699.904-749,279.5811/17/2015 11/17/2015 Maturity-350,000.00 89116FYH7Toronto Dominion Holdings (U.S.A.), Inc.0.00 11/17/2015100.00350,000.0011/17/2015 11/17/2015 Maturity-350,000.00 89116FYH7Toronto Dominion Holdings (U.S.A.), Inc.0.00 11/17/2015100.00350,000.0011/28/2015 11/28/2015 Coupon0.00 89233AHP7Toyota Motor Credit Corporation0.364 02/19/2016---166.6310/28/2015 10/28/2015 Coupon0.00 89233AHP7Toyota Motor Credit Corporation0.364 02/19/2016---152.0012/28/2015 12/28/2015 Coupon0.00 89233AHP7Toyota Motor Credit Corporation0.403 02/19/2016---162.2210/15/2015 10/15/2015 Coupon0.00 89236WAB4TAOT 2015-A A20.71 07/17/2017---355.0012/15/2015 12/15/2015 Principal Paydown-55,774.07 89236WAB4TART-15A-A20.71 07/17/2017---55,774.0712/15/2015 12/15/2015 Coupon0.00 89236WAB4TART-15A-A20.71 07/17/2017---326.3811/15/2015 11/15/2015 Coupon0.00 89236WAB4TAOT 2015-A A20.71 07/17/2017---355.0011/15/2015 11/15/2015 Principal Paydown-48,370.47 89236WAB4TAOT 2015-A A20.71 07/17/2017---48,370.4711/15/2015 11/15/2015 Coupon0.00 90290XAB3USAOT 2015-1 A20.82 03/15/2018---328.0010/15/2015 10/15/2015 Coupon0.00 90290XAB3USAOT 2015-1 A20.82 03/15/2018---328.0012/15/2015 12/15/2015 Coupon0.00 90290XAB3USAOT-151-A20.82 03/15/2018---328.0010/26/2015 10/26/2015 Coupon0.00 90331HMR1US BANK NA CINCINNATI0.62 01/26/2018---1,128.2111/25/2015 11/25/2015 Buy1,000,000.00 912828RF9US TREASURY N/B1.00 08/31/2016100.32-1,005,565.7711/30/2015 11/30/2015 Coupon0.00 912828SY7US TREASURY N/B0.625 05/31/2017---1,562.5011/04/2015 11/05/2015 Buy500,000.00 912828SY7US TREASURY N/B0.625 05/31/201799.836-500,528.7310/23/2015 10/26/2015 Buy1,000,000.00 912828TS9US TREASURY N/B0.625 09/30/201799.988-1,000,326.8012/31/2015 12/31/2015 Coupon0.00 912828WQ9UNITED STATES TREASURY0.50 06/30/2016---2,500.0011/15/2015 11/15/2015 Coupon0.00 91412GUT0UNIV OF CALIFORNIA-AN0.634 05/15/2016---792.5011/23/2015 11/23/2015 Coupon0.00 928668AD4VOLKSWAGEN GROUP AMERICA0.598 05/23/2016---695.0010/01/2015 10/01/2015 Buy772,204.47 949917397WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I0.06 12/31/20151.00-772,204.4710/08/2015 10/08/2015 Buy1,694.81 949917397WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I0.06 12/31/20151.00-1,694.8110/12/2015 10/15/2015 Buy1,003,350.00 949917397WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I0.06 12/31/20151.00-1,003,350.0010/16/2015 10/16/2015 Buy16,205.74 949917397WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I0.06 12/31/20151.00-16,205.7410/16/2015 10/16/2015 Buy17,661.08 949917397WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I0.06 12/31/20151.00-17,661.0810/15/2015 10/15/2015 Sell-999,694.98 949917397WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I0.06 12/31/20151.00999,694.9810/15/2015 10/15/2015 Buy115,937.81 949917397WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I0.06 12/31/20151.00-115,937.8110/15/2015 10/15/2015 Buy54,268.52 949917397WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I0.06 12/31/20151.00-54,268.5210/13/2015 10/13/2015 Buy1,123.17 949917397WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I0.06 12/31/20151.00-1,123.1710/20/2015 10/20/2015 Sell-4,250.38 949917397WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I0.06 12/31/20151.004,250.3810/19/2015 10/19/2015 Buy1,200,000.00 949917397WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I0.06 12/31/20151.00-1,200,000.0010/19/2015 10/19/2015 Buy18,231.60 949917397WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I0.06 12/31/20151.00-18,231.6010/23/2015 10/23/2015 Buy296.67 949917397WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I0.06 12/31/20151.00-296.6710/28/2015 10/28/2015 Buy151.79 949917397WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I0.06 12/31/20151.00-151.7910/27/2015 10/27/2015 Sell-299,868.00 949917397WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I0.06 12/31/20151.00299,868.0010/26/2015 10/26/2015 Buy1,128.21 949917397WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I0.06 12/31/20151.00-1,128.2110/26/2015 10/26/2015 Sell-1,000,326.80 949917397WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I0.06 12/31/20151.001,000,326.8010/31/2015 10/31/2015 Money Market Funds0.00 949917397WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I0.06 12/31/2015---188.6711/05/2015 11/05/2015 Sell-1,000,515.08 949917397WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I0.08 12/31/20151.001,000,515.0811/04/2015 11/04/2015 Buy1,001,250.00 949917397WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I0.08 12/31/20151.00-1,001,250.0011/02/2015 11/02/2015 Buy3,938.67 949917397WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I0.08 12/31/20151.00-3,938.6711/13/2015 11/13/2015 Buy51,102.67 949917397WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I0.08 12/31/20151.00-51,102.67Transaction DetailWC-Contra Costa County (19529)Base Currency: USD 10/01/2015 - 12/31/2015Return to Table of ContentsDated: 01/11/201623March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes620 Summary * Grouped By: Status. * Groups Sorted By: Status. * Showing transactions with Entry Date within selected date range. * MMF transactions are expanded. * The Transaction Detail/Trading Activity reports provide our most up-to-date transactional details. As such, these reports are subject to change even after the other reports on the website have been locked down. While these reports can be useful tools in understanding recent activity,due to their dynamic nature we do not recommend using them for booking journal entries or reconciliation.Entry Date Settle Date Transaction TypeBase Current Units IdentifierDescriptionCouponRateFinal MaturityPriceBase Amount11/17/2015 11/17/2015 Buy775,976.46 949917397WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I0.08 12/31/20151.00-775,976.4611/16/2015 11/16/2015 Buy71,553.47 949917397WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I0.08 12/31/20151.00-71,553.4711/16/2015 11/16/2015 Buy759,073.60 949917397WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I0.08 12/31/20151.00-759,073.6011/16/2015 11/16/2015 Buy126,735.24 949917397WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I0.08 12/31/20151.00-126,735.2411/20/2015 11/20/2015 Buy9,913.58 949917397WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I0.08 12/31/20151.00-9,913.5811/19/2015 11/19/2015 Buy260,693.39 949917397WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I0.08 12/31/20151.00-260,693.3911/18/2015 11/18/2015 Buy17,151.96 949917397WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I0.08 12/31/20151.00-17,151.9611/25/2015 11/25/2015 Sell-1,005,565.77 949917397WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I0.08 12/31/20151.001,005,565.7711/24/2015 11/24/2015 Buy14,560.36 949917397WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I0.08 12/31/20151.00-14,560.3611/23/2015 11/23/2015 Buy695.00 949917397WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I0.08 12/31/20151.00-695.0011/23/2015 11/23/2015 Buy3,125.00 949917397WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I0.08 12/31/20151.00-3,125.0012/03/2015 12/03/2015 Sell-1,000,206.11 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.25 12/31/20151.001,000,206.1112/02/2015 12/02/2015 Buy166.63 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.25 12/31/20151.00-166.6312/01/2015 12/01/2015 Buy225.31 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.25 12/31/20151.00-225.3112/01/2015 12/01/2015 Sell-749,279.58 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.25 12/31/20151.00749,279.5811/30/2015 11/30/2015 Money Market Funds0.00 949917397WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I0.08 12/31/2015---225.3111/30/2015 11/30/2015 Buy1,562.50 949917397WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I0.08 12/31/20151.00-1,562.5012/07/2015 12/07/2015 Buy488.75 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.25 12/31/20151.00-488.7512/11/2015 12/11/2015 Buy251,250.00 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.25 12/31/20151.00-251,250.0012/10/2015 12/10/2015 Buy10,625.00 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.25 12/31/20151.00-10,625.0012/08/2015 12/08/2015 Sell-649,426.47 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.25 12/31/20151.00649,426.4712/15/2015 12/15/2015 Buy2.89 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.25 12/31/20151.00-2.8912/15/2015 12/15/2015 Buy159.11 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.25 12/31/20151.00-159.1112/15/2015 12/15/2015 Buy425.00 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.25 12/31/20151.00-425.0012/18/2015 12/18/2015 Buy3.58 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.25 12/31/20151.00-3.5812/18/2015 12/18/2015 Buy11,005.69 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.25 12/31/20151.00-11,005.6912/17/2015 12/17/2015 Buy14.73 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.25 12/31/20151.00-14.7312/16/2015 12/16/2015 Buy326.67 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.25 12/31/20151.00-326.6712/16/2015 12/16/2015 Buy7,710.68 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.25 12/31/20151.00-7,710.6812/23/2015 12/23/2015 Sell-112,240.79 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.25 12/31/20151.00112,240.7912/21/2015 12/21/2015 Buy949.06 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.25 12/31/20151.00-949.0612/21/2015 12/21/2015 Sell-4,089.42 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.25 12/31/20151.004,089.4212/31/2015 12/31/2015 Buy2,500.00 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.25 12/31/20151.00-2,500.0012/29/2015 12/29/2015 Buy162.22 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.25 12/31/20151.00-162.2210/20/2015 10/20/2015 Management Fee0.00 CCYUSDUS Dollar0.00 12/31/2015----4,250.3811/20/2015 11/20/2015 Management Fee0.00 CCYUSDUS Dollar0.00 12/31/2015----4,148.9212/21/2015 12/21/2015 Management Fee0.00 CCYUSDUS Dollar0.00 12/31/2015----4,089.42---------67,824.73 --------- -------105.92Entry Date Settle Date Transaction TypeBase Current Units IdentifierDescriptionCouponRateFinal MaturityPriceBase Amount---------67,824.73 --------- ------119.46Transaction DetailWC-Contra Costa County (19529)Base Currency: USD 10/01/2015 - 12/31/2015Return to Table of ContentsDated: 01/11/201624March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes621 * Does not Lock Down.ReceivableSettledEntry DateSettle DateTransaction TypeBase Current Units IdentifierTicker DescriptionBase Amount12/31/201512/31/2015Money Market Funds0.00 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I225.3812/31/201512/31/2015Money Market Funds0.00 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I225.38Entry DateSettle DateTransaction TypeBase Current Units IdentifierTicker DescriptionBase Amount10/01/201510/01/2015Buy772,204.47 949917397SHIXX WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I-772,204.4710/08/201510/08/2015Buy1,694.81 949917397SHIXX WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I-1,694.8110/12/201510/15/2015Buy1,003,350.00 949917397SHIXX WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I-1,003,350.0010/16/201510/16/2015Buy16,205.74 949917397SHIXX WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I-16,205.7410/16/201510/16/2015Buy17,661.08 949917397SHIXX WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I-17,661.0810/15/201510/15/2015Sell-999,694.98 949917397SHIXX WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I999,694.9810/15/201510/15/2015Buy115,937.81 949917397SHIXX WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I-115,937.8110/15/201510/15/2015Buy54,268.52 949917397SHIXX WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I-54,268.5210/13/201510/13/2015Buy1,123.17 949917397SHIXX WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I-1,123.1710/20/201510/20/2015Sell-4,250.38 949917397SHIXX WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I4,250.3810/19/201510/19/2015Buy1,200,000.00 949917397SHIXX WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I-1,200,000.0010/19/201510/19/2015Buy18,231.60 949917397SHIXX WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I-18,231.6010/23/201510/23/2015Buy296.67 949917397SHIXX WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I-296.6710/28/201510/28/2015Buy151.79 949917397SHIXX WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I-151.7910/27/201510/27/2015Sell-299,868.00 949917397SHIXX WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I299,868.0010/26/201510/26/2015Buy1,128.21 949917397SHIXX WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I-1,128.2110/26/201510/26/2015Sell-1,000,326.80 949917397SHIXX WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I1,000,326.8010/31/201510/31/2015Money Market Funds0.00 949917397SHIXX WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I188.6711/05/201511/05/2015Sell-1,000,515.08 949917397SHIXX WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I1,000,515.0811/04/201511/04/2015Buy1,001,250.00 949917397SHIXX WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I-1,001,250.0011/02/201511/02/2015Buy3,938.67 949917397SHIXX WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I-3,938.6711/13/201511/13/2015Buy51,102.67 949917397SHIXX WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I-51,102.6711/17/201511/17/2015Buy775,976.46 949917397SHIXX WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I-775,976.4611/16/201511/16/2015Buy71,553.47 949917397SHIXX WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I-71,553.4711/16/201511/16/2015Buy759,073.60 949917397SHIXX WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I-759,073.6011/16/201511/16/2015Buy126,735.24 949917397SHIXX WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I-126,735.2411/20/201511/20/2015Buy9,913.58 949917397SHIXX WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I-9,913.5811/19/201511/19/2015Buy260,693.39 949917397SHIXX WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I-260,693.3911/18/201511/18/2015Buy17,151.96 949917397SHIXX WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I-17,151.9611/25/201511/25/2015Sell-1,005,565.77 949917397SHIXX WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I1,005,565.7711/24/201511/24/2015Buy14,560.36 949917397SHIXX WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I-14,560.3611/23/201511/23/2015Buy695.00 949917397SHIXX WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I-695.0011/23/201511/23/2015Buy3,125.00 949917397SHIXX WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I-3,125.0012/03/201512/03/2015Sell-1,000,206.11 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I1,000,206.1112/02/201512/02/2015Buy166.63 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I-166.6312/01/201512/01/2015Buy225.31 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I-225.3112/01/201512/01/2015Sell-749,279.58 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I749,279.5811/30/201511/30/2015Money Market Funds0.00 949917397SHIXX WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I225.3111/30/201511/30/2015Buy1,562.50 949917397SHIXX WFA HERITAGE MONEY MARK-I-1,562.5012/07/201512/07/2015Buy488.75 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I-488.7512/11/201512/11/2015Buy251,250.00 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I-251,250.0012/10/201512/10/2015Buy10,625.00 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I-10,625.00MMF Transaction DetailWC-Contra Costa County (19529)Base Currency: USD 10/01/2015 - 12/31/2015Return to Table of ContentsDated: 01/11/201625March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes622 Summary * Grouped By: Status. * Groups Sorted By: Status. * Filtered By: Security Type = "MMFUND". * Showing transactions with Entry Date within selected date range. * MMF transactions are expanded. * The Transaction Detail/Trading Activity reports provide our most up-to-date transactional details. As such, these reports are subject to change even after the other reports on the website have been locked down. While these reports can be useful tools in understanding recent activity,due to their dynamic nature we do not recommend using them for booking journal entries or reconciliation.Entry DateSettle DateTransaction TypeBase Current Units IdentifierTicker DescriptionBase Amount12/08/201512/08/2015Sell-649,426.47 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I649,426.4712/15/201512/15/2015Buy2.89 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I-2.8912/15/201512/15/2015Buy159.11 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I-159.1112/15/201512/15/2015Buy425.00 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I-425.0012/18/201512/18/2015Buy3.58 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I-3.5812/18/201512/18/2015Buy11,005.69 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I-11,005.6912/17/201512/17/2015Buy14.73 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I-14.7312/16/201512/16/2015Buy326.67 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I-326.6712/16/201512/16/2015Buy7,710.68 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I-7,710.6812/23/201512/23/2015Sell-112,240.79 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I112,240.7912/21/201512/21/2015Buy949.06 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I-949.0612/21/201512/21/2015Sell-4,089.42 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I4,089.4212/31/201512/31/2015Buy2,500.00 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I-2,500.0012/29/201512/29/2015Buy162.22 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I-162.22----------239,862.29 949917397SHIXX ---240,276.27Entry DateSettle DateTransaction TypeBase Current Units IdentifierTicker DescriptionBase Amount----------239,862.29 949917397SHIXX ---240,501.65MMF Transaction DetailWC-Contra Costa County (19529)Base Currency: USD 10/01/2015 - 12/31/2015Return to Table of ContentsDated: 01/11/201626March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes623 Identifier,DescriptionBeginning MarketValue + Accrued,Base PurchasesBase Sales,Base Maturities andRedemptionsBase Paydowns Base Net TransferredValueBase Amortization/AccretionChange In AccruedBalanceNet RealizedGain/LossBase Change InNet UnrealizedGain/LossBase Change In Cash,Payables/ReceivablesEnding Market Value +Accrued41284AAB4HARLY-141-A2A108,053.540.000.000.00-42,295.550.001.39-9.21-0.016.900.0065,757.0643814KAB7HONDO-151-A2335,064.360.000.000.00-82,034.380.004.96-25.52-0.01-211.640.00252,797.7758768EAC3MBALT 2014-A A2A15,634.060.000.000.00-15,632.820.000.01-3.33-0.002.080.000.0047787VAB7JDOT-14-A2133,404.370.000.000.00-133,407.570.000.40-26.68-0.0029.480.000.0089236WAB4TART-15A-A2600,201.330.000.000.00-104,144.540.001.41-32.86-0.00-431.270.00495,594.07949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I1,639,290.616,585,601.09-6,825,463.380.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.001,399,428.32912828B82UNITED STATES TREASURY1,000,681.910.000.000.000.000.00475.12631.870.00-1,022.120.001,000,766.78459058DM2INTERNATIONAL BANK FORRECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOP0.00999,970.000.000.000.000.005.27625.000.00201.730.001,000,802.003130A4KE1FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS501,090.330.000.000.000.000.0019.31-513.330.00-381.810.00500,214.5036962G6Q2GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORP752,339.110.000.000.000.000.00-422.0859.770.00-339.170.00751,637.6374256LAC3PRINCIPAL LIFE GLOBAL FUNDING II250,951.890.000.00-250,000.000.000.00-273.80-763.890.0085.800.000.00605581FW2MISSISSIPPI ST301,497.000.000.000.000.000.000.00-480.000.00-756.000.00300,261.00677520FR4OH ST-TXB-DEV ASST-A770,212.500.000.00-750,000.000.000.000.00 -20,212.500.000.000.000.0090331HMR1US BANK NA450,683.800.000.000.000.000.00-115.7020.770.00-2,264.350.00448,324.5290331HMR1US BANK NA300,455.860.000.000.000.000.000.0013.850.00-1,586.700.00298,883.01857477AH6STATE STREET CORP288,328.420.000.000.000.000.00-1,614.402,048.440.00-163.710.00288,598.74857477AH6STATE STREET CORP303,503.600.000.000.000.000.00-1,755.212,156.250.00-116.490.00303,788.1506050TLU4BANK OF AMERICA NA499,529.530.000.000.000.000.000.0011.770.00190.500.00499,731.803133EDGC0FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK1,001,166.830.000.00-1,000,000.000.000.00122.17-1,020.830.00-268.170.000.00084664CD1BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY FINANCE CORP747,927.920.000.000.000.000.000.0057.670.001,336.500.00749,322.0805531FAG8BB&T CORP757,584.920.000.000.000.000.00-4,751.396,000.000.00284.390.00759,117.923133EFBT3FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKSFUNDING CORP1,000,597.000.000.000.000.000.0050.271,050.000.00-1,363.270.001,000,334.0070659PAE1PENAR 2013-1A A1750,064.260.000.000.00-750,000.000.000.00-163.260.0099.000.000.00161571GJ7CHAIT 2014-A1 A1777,719.560.000.000.000.000.00-252.140.000.00-2,670.540.00774,796.8803255LGX1ANAHEIM CALIF PUB FING AUTH LEASEREV754,017.500.000.000.000.000.000.00-1,875.000.00-682.500.00751,460.00912828QX1UNITED STATES TREASURY1,012,058.170.000.000.000.000.00-2,674.023,750.000.00-1,817.980.001,011,316.174197915E4HAWAII ST752,196.250.000.000.000.000.000.001,370.630.00-937.500.00752,629.38912828SY7UNITED STATES TREASURY0.00499,179.690.000.000.000.0081.60273.220.00-1,468.290.00498,066.22Roll ForwardWC-Contra Costa County (19529)Base Currency: USD 10/01/2015 - 12/31/2015Return to Table of ContentsDated: 01/11/201627March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes624 Identifier,DescriptionBeginning MarketValue + Accrued,Base PurchasesBase Sales,Base Maturities andRedemptionsBase Paydowns Base Net TransferredValueBase Amortization/AccretionChange In AccruedBalanceNet RealizedGain/LossBase Change InNet UnrealizedGain/LossBase Change In Cash,Payables/ReceivablesEnding Market Value +Accrued89233AHP7Toyota Motor Credit Corporation499,980.130.000.000.000.000.000.0015.120.00-46.500.00499,948.743130A3J70FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS1,003,698.220.000.000.000.000.00-353.08-1,562.500.00-3,081.920.00998,700.72097023BC8BOEING CO785,805.630.000.000.000.000.00-5,422.32-7,031.250.00-2,441.430.00770,910.6390290XAB3USAOT-151-A2481,151.250.000.000.000.000.001.970.000.00-1,717.780.00479,435.4589116EC19Toronto Dominion Holdings (U.S.A.), Inc.0.00749,279.580.000.000.000.00245.420.000.00-89.250.00749,435.75928668AD4VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICAFINANCE LLC492,603.800.000.000.000.000.000.0033.900.004,142.500.00496,780.20912828VL1UNITED STATES TREASURY1,003,694.730.000.000.000.000.00-674.921,562.500.00-1,617.080.001,002,965.2389116FYH7Toronto Dominion Holdings (U.S.A.), Inc.349,929.070.000.00-350,000.000.000.00146.220.000.00-75.290.000.0089116FYH7Toronto Dominion Holdings (U.S.A.), Inc.349,929.070.000.00-350,000.000.000.00137.080.000.00-66.150.000.003137EACW7FREDDIE MAC0.00236,903.500.000.000.000.00-127.401,645.000.00115.180.00238,536.28CCYUSDReceivable107.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00118.38225.38CCYUSDCash0.870.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00-10.52-9.65CCYUSDPayable0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.003130A2T97FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS0.001,001,080.000.000.000.000.00-241.381,291.670.00-2,593.620.00999,536.673130A2T97FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS500,401.830.000.000.000.000.00-104.89625.000.00-1,153.610.00499,768.3376912TJC8RIVERSIDE CNTY CALIF PUB FING AUTHTAX ALLOC REV125,112.920.000.000.000.000.0093.10312.500.00-193.100.00125,325.4236164EAB1GEETT-151-A2400,489.910.000.000.00-400,000.000.0029.25-79.110.00-440.050.000.00912828RF9UNITED STATES TREASURY1,006,437.650.000.000.000.000.00-1,421.412,527.470.00-2,133.590.001,005,410.12912828RF9UNITED STATES TREASURY0.001,003,203.130.000.000.000.00-423.273,379.120.00-748.860.001,005,410.12912828WQ9UNITED STATES TREASURY1,002,982.590.000.000.000.000.00-103.38-1,249.850.00-1,849.620.00999,779.7446625HHW3JPMORGAN CHASE & CO758,135.920.000.000.000.000.00-3,267.414,875.000.00-438.340.00759,305.1758772PAB4MBART-151-A2A0.00649,085.940.000.000.000.0041.87236.890.00-619.170.00648,745.5369371RK96PACCAR FINANCIAL CORP205,543.860.000.00-205,000.000.000.00-62.39-538.130.0056.650.000.0069371RK96PACCAR FINANCIAL CORP501,326.500.000.00-500,000.000.000.00-183.60-1,312.500.00169.600.000.003136FPET0FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGEASSOCIATION1,008,728.670.000.000.000.000.00-4,195.205,000.000.00-51.800.001,009,481.67313384SS9FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS999,397.000.000.000.000.000.00638.890.000.00-257.890.00999,778.00459056HY6INTERNATIONAL BANK FORRECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOP770,331.540.000.000.000.000.00867.760.000.00-331.910.00770,867.39Roll ForwardWC-Contra Costa County (19529)Base Currency: USD 10/01/2015 - 12/31/2015Return to Table of ContentsDated: 01/11/201628March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes625 Identifier,DescriptionBeginning MarketValue + Accrued,Base PurchasesBase Sales,Base Maturities andRedemptionsBase Paydowns Base Net TransferredValueBase Amortization/AccretionChange In AccruedBalanceNet RealizedGain/LossBase Change InNet UnrealizedGain/LossBase Change In Cash,Payables/ReceivablesEnding Market Value +Accrued459056HY6INTERNATIONAL BANK FORRECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOP162,858.680.000.000.000.000.00206.960.000.00-93.670.00162,971.9645905U7F5INTERNATIONAL BK FOR RECON & DEVMEDIUM TERM BK N998,187.500.000.000.000.000.000.001,125.000.00-4,300.000.00995,012.503133EDQW5FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKSFUNDING CORP1,001,016.890.000.000.000.000.00225.72725.000.00-667.720.001,001,299.8969349LAH1PNC BANK,NA751,559.250.000.000.000.000.00-649.091,500.000.00127.090.00752,537.253133EDXG2FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK1,003,280.060.00-1,000,000.000.000.000.00-36.62-3,108.060.00-135.380.000.0017275RAY8CISCO SYSTEMS INC746,934.500.000.000.000.000.000.0093.380.001,689.000.00748,716.8806406HBX6BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORP762,629.250.000.000.000.000.00-3,113.724,312.500.00-147.280.00763,680.75313384ZK8FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS0.00498,263.190.000.000.000.0076.250.000.00106.060.00498,445.503130A3XU3FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS1,000,547.220.000.000.000.000.0033.22625.000.00-50.220.001,001,155.22762494QV7RIALTO CALIF UNI SCH DIST250,929.170.000.000.000.000.000.00786.250.00-740.000.00250,975.4268428LDH4ORANGE CNTY CALIF PENSION OBLIG300,820.670.000.000.000.000.000.00510.000.00-447.000.00300,883.6768428LDH4ORANGE CNTY CALIF PENSION OBLIG491,340.420.000.000.000.000.000.00833.000.00-730.100.00491,443.32912828TS9UNITED STATES TREASURY0.00999,882.810.000.000.000.0011.141,588.110.00-6,807.950.00994,674.1106050TMB5BANK OF AMERICA NA249,486.650.000.000.000.000.000.0031.690.00-197.250.00249,321.105446462Q4LOS ANGELES CALIF UNI SCH DIST400,738.000.000.000.000.000.000.00486.000.00-252.000.00400,972.00313373SZ6FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS1,018,359.080.000.000.000.000.00-4,062.30-5,312.500.00-1,292.700.001,007,691.5831680GAB2FTAT-151-A2A0.00499,986.350.000.000.000.001.47226.670.00-1,190.170.00499,024.3243814GAB6HONDO-142-A245,509.700.000.000.00-45,521.000.000.48-6.410.0017.230.000.0091412GUT0UNIVERSITY CALIF REVS250,941.280.000.000.000.000.000.00-396.250.00-250.000.00250,295.0347787WAB5JDOT-15B-A2400,375.960.000.000.000.000.002.14-65.330.00-1,060.180.00399,252.5802665WAY7AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORP500,080.990.000.000.000.000.000.0094.420.00-563.500.00499,611.92191216BR0COCA-COLA CO0.00299,868.000.000.000.000.0011.92466.670.00-997.720.00299,348.87437076BJ0HOME DEPOT INC751,401.980.000.000.000.000.000.0076.640.00-61.500.00751,417.13912828PS3UNITED STATES TREASURY1,009,697.570.000.000.000.000.00-4,222.165,000.000.00-885.840.001,009,589.57912828PS3UNITED STATES TREASURY1,009,697.570.000.000.000.000.00-4,183.635,000.000.00-924.370.001,009,589.5714912L4X6CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICESCORP786,489.120.000.000.000.000.00-2,727.563,971.880.00-1,368.310.00786,365.12544587B72LOS ANGELES CALIF MUN IMPT CORPLEASE REV0.00490,000.000.000.000.000.000.00720.300.00837.900.00491,558.20Roll ForwardWC-Contra Costa County (19529)Base Currency: USD 10/01/2015 - 12/31/2015Return to Table of ContentsDated: 01/11/201629March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes626 * Weighted By: Ending Base Market Value + Accrued.Identifier,DescriptionBeginning MarketValue + Accrued,Base PurchasesBase Sales,Base Maturities andRedemptionsBase Paydowns Base Net TransferredValueBase Amortization/AccretionChange In AccruedBalanceNet RealizedGain/LossBase Change InNet UnrealizedGain/LossBase Change In Cash,Payables/ReceivablesEnding Market Value +Accrued41284BAB2HARLY-151-A2A399,834.830.000.000.00-80,342.740.000.66-28.570.00-474.360.00318,989.8231679KAB6FTAT-142-A2A239,601.300.000.000.00-152,916.770.005.16-30.580.0041.610.0086,700.7365477WAB2NART-14B-A2602,298.710.000.000.00-206,017.610.007.94-54.940.0189.740.00396,323.853133EDGM8FFCB 0.350 03/10/16 CALd200,045.630.000.00-200,000.000.000.0016.67-40.83132.43-153.900.000.003133EDGM8FFCB 0.350 03/10/16 CALd1,000,228.170.000.00-1,000,000.000.000.0044.57-204.17354.06-422.620.000.00------44,384,932.9314,512,303.28-7,825,463.38-4,605,000.00-2,012,312.980.00 -43,826.7021,598.49486.48 -51,013.28107.86 44,381,812.71Roll ForwardWC-Contra Costa County (19529)Base Currency: USD 10/01/2015 - 12/31/2015Return to Table of ContentsDated: 01/11/201630March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes627 Identifier DescriptionSecurity Type Base Market Value BookYieldYield Duration -200 Basis PointShock-100 Basis PointShock-50 Basis PointShock50 Basis PointShock100 Basis PointShock200 Basis PointShock02665WAY7 AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORP CORP499,442.00 1.036 1.676 0.214501,233.39500,510.83499,976.41498,907.60498,373.21497,304.4903255LGX1 ANAHEIM CALIF PUB FING AUTH LEASEREVMUNI750,210.00 1.00 0.943 0.34752,615.42752,615.42751,485.39748,934.67747,659.40745,109.0205531FAG8 BB&T CORPCORP752,051.25 0.662 0.973 0.168753,269.80753,269.80752,680.12751,416.68750,776.41749,478.7806050TLU4 BANK OF AMERICA NACORP499,200.50 0.846 1.724 0.117500,207.50499,784.59499,492.54498,908.47498,616.46498,032.4706050TMB5 BANK OF AMERICA NACORP249,164.50 0.916 1.852 0.173249,962.86249,595.57249,380.03248,948.98248,733.46248,302.4406406HBX6 BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORP CORP756,349.50 0.644 0.831 0.57759,932.26759,932.26758,505.15754,193.96752,038.53747,728.02084664CD1 BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY FINANCECORPCORP748,287.75 0.63 1.588 0.025748,584.82748,474.82748,381.29748,194.21748,100.67747,913.61097023BC8 BOEING COCORP767,707.50 0.849 1.008 0.875774,479.15774,425.40771,066.34764,348.89760,990.52754,274.4614912L4X6 CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICESCORPCORP779,745.32 0.643 1.005 0.578784,275.02784,252.49781,998.85777,491.92775,238.63770,732.40161571GJ7 CHAIT 2014-A1 A1ABS774,400.77 1.022 1.236 1.029784,250.89782,369.97778,385.21770,416.63766,432.81758,466.0817275RAY8 CISCO SYSTEMS INCCORP748,425.75 0.834 1.662 0.199750,901.18749,915.15749,170.44747,681.08746,936.42745,447.17191216BR0 COCA-COLA COCORP298,882.20 0.897 1.089 1.802304,748.14304,268.68301,575.29296,189.43293,496.97288,113.003130A2T97 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKSAGCY BOND1,497,367.50 0.396 0.727 0.74 1,505,423.39 1,505,423.39 1,502,907.93 1,491,827.41 1,486,287.65 1,475,209.163130A3J70 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKSAGCY BOND998,041.00 0.484 0.822 0.892 1,005,359.28 1,005,359.28 1,002,492.41993,589.89989,139.07980,238.343130A3XU3 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKSAGCY BOND1,000,058.00 0.263 0.144 0.064 1,000,150.17 1,000,150.17 1,000,150.17999,737.98999,417.96998,777.933130A4KE1 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKSAGCY BOND499,802.00 0.345 0.466 0.252500,388.94500,388.94500,388.94499,172.26498,542.55497,283.20313373SZ6 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKSAGCY BOND1,006,452.00 0.50 0.647 0.443 1,009,336.79 1,009,336.79 1,008,681.34 1,004,222.76 1,001,993.61997,535.64313384SS9 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKSAGCY DISC999,778.00 0.254 0.243 0.097 1,000,013.66 1,000,013.66 1,000,013.66999,293.12998,808.27997,838.63313384ZK8 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKSAGCY DISC498,445.50 0.622 0.588 0.54500,028.22500,028.22499,791.34497,099.73495,754.04493,062.893133EDQW5 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKSFUNDING CORPAGCY BOND1,000,011.00 0.38 0.278 0.058 1,000,172.24 1,000,172.24 1,000,172.24999,721.00999,430.99998,850.993133EFBT3 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKSFUNDING CORPAGCY BOND998,934.00 0.44 0.572 0.666 1,002,739.59 1,002,739.59 1,002,260.55995,607.65992,281.49985,629.803136FPET0 FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGEASSOCIATIONAGCY BOND1,003,315.00 0.326 0.226 0.194 1,003,754.90 1,003,754.90 1,003,754.90 1,002,341.80 1,001,368.61999,422.343137EACW7 FREDDIE MACAGCY BOND236,891.28 0.827 0.706 0.646237,971.73237,971.73237,656.46236,126.14235,361.05233,830.9831679KAB6 FTAT-142-A2AABS86,683.38 0.456 1.00 0.07986,751.8786,751.8786,717.6286,649.1486,614.9186,546.4431680GAB2 FTAT-151-A2AABS498,797.65 1.024 1.344 0.767503,939.95502,623.68500,710.60496,884.82494,972.12491,147.0936962G6Q2 GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORP CORP750,012.00 0.712 0.948 0.022750,168.42750,168.42750,094.50749,929.50749,847.00749,681.9941284AAB4 HARLY-141-A2AABS65,742.73 0.494 0.941 0.20265,867.7065,867.7065,809.1365,676.3365,609.9465,477.1641284BAB2 HARLY-151-A2AABS318,876.26 0.80 1.103 0.559320,842.51320,658.89319,767.55317,985.03317,093.85315,311.674197915E4 HAWAII STMUNI750,345.00 0.731 0.68 0.588753,345.28753,345.28752,551.07748,139.04745,933.20741,521.84437076BJ0 HOME DEPOT INCCORP751,104.75 0.896 1.439 0.203753,298.93752,629.53751,867.13750,342.39749,580.04748,055.4243814KAB7 HONDO-151-A2ABS252,719.07 0.706 1.015 0.311253,516.86253,505.07253,112.06252,326.11251,933.16251,147.31459056HY6 INTERNATIONAL BANK FORRECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPSOVEREIGNGOV933,839.35 0.462 0.158 0.125934,023.79934,023.79934,023.79933,255.71932,672.10931,504.94459058DM2 INTERNATIONAL BANK FORRECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPSOVEREIGNGOV1,000,177.00 0.507 0.428 0.377 1,001,790.87 1,001,790.87 1,001,790.87998,291.70996,406.48992,636.2745905U7F5 INTERNATIONAL BK FOR RECON & DEVMEDIUM TERM BK NSOVEREIGNGOV992,700.00 0.45 1.783 0.547 1,002,382.76998,130.37995,415.11989,985.04987,270.23981,841.0546625HHW3 JPMORGAN CHASE & COCORP750,313.50 0.86 1.473 0.041750,766.64750,621.13750,467.31750,159.69750,005.87749,698.2447787WAB5 JDOT-15B-A2ABS399,078.36 0.983 1.258 0.857403,381.23402,498.70400,788.47397,368.37395,658.50392,239.11544587B72 LOS ANGELES CALIF MUN IMPT CORPLEASE REVMUNI490,837.90 1.26 1.082 0.838495,288.72494,951.39492,894.58488,781.36486,724.95482,612.545446462Q4 LOS ANGELES CALIF UNI SCH DIST MUNI400,000.00 0.486 0.306 0.008400,009.79400,009.79400,009.79399,984.00399,968.00399,936.0058772PAB4 MBART-151-A2AABS648,508.64 1.007 1.161 0.689653,696.64652,977.16650,742.83646,274.60644,040.71639,573.36605581FW2 MISSISSIPPI STMUNI299,781.00 0.64 0.767 0.754301,514.77301,514.77300,911.21298,650.86297,520.79295,260.8465477WAB2 NART-14B-A2ABS396,218.12 0.606 0.901 0.229397,035.66397,035.66396,671.80395,764.46395,310.82394,403.6068428LDH4 ORANGE CNTY CALIF PENSION OBLIG MUNI790,118.50 0.68 0.488 0.093790,477.10790,477.10790,477.10789,751.10789,383.73788,649.0469349LAH1 PNC BANK,NACORP749,987.25 0.439 0.826 0.08750,482.87750,482.87750,287.25749,687.26749,387.30748,787.42Shock AnalysisWC-Contra Costa County (19529)Base Currency: USD As of 12/31/2015Return to Table of ContentsDated: 01/11/201631March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes628 * Weighted By: Base Market Value + Accrued. *The shock analysis includes a yield floor of 0.Identifier DescriptionSecurity Type Base Market Value BookYieldYield Duration -200 Basis PointShock-100 Basis PointShock-50 Basis PointShock50 Basis PointShock100 Basis PointShock200 Basis PointShock762494QV7 RIALTO CALIF UNI SCH DISTMUNI249,665.00 1.258 1.412 1.078253,465.66252,356.60251,010.75248,319.36246,973.82244,283.0776912TJC8 RIVERSIDE CNTY CALIF PUB FINGAUTH TAX ALLOC REVMUNI124,908.75 1.301 1.139 0.67125,862.03125,745.69125,327.21124,490.32124,071.91123,235.17857477AH6 STATE STREET CORPCORP587,060.95 0.573 0.945 0.185588,087.31588,087.31587,603.99586,517.93585,974.92584,888.9589116EC19 Toronto Dominion Holdings (U.S.A.), Inc. CP749,435.75 0.381 0.455 0.169750,012.04750,012.04750,012.04748,802.49748,169.24746,902.8189233AHP7 Toyota Motor Credit CorporationCD499,918.50 0.592 0.704 0.101500,273.97500,273.97500,170.97499,666.05499,413.61498,908.7689236WAB4 TART-15A-A2ABS495,437.60 0.711 0.971 0.326497,005.96497,005.96496,245.18494,630.06493,822.55492,207.6490290XAB3 USAOT-151-A2ABS479,260.51 0.825 1.08 0.612482,428.43482,193.75480,727.09477,794.02476,327.61473,395.0390331HMR1 US BANK NACORP746,342.25 0.568 1.716 0.06747,110.68746,790.06746,566.15746,118.35745,894.44745,446.64912828B82 UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV999,922.00 0.44 0.25 0.169 1,000,344.47 1,000,344.47 1,000,344.47999,077.08998,232.18996,542.46912828PS3 UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV2,002,440.00 0.325 0.468 0.086 2,003,245.96 2,003,245.96 2,003,245.96 2,001,578.98 2,000,718.00 1,998,996.20912828QX1 UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV1,005,039.00 0.434 0.618 0.581 1,008,647.79 1,008,647.79 1,007,958.71 1,002,119.44999,200.03993,361.65912828RF9 UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV2,004,062.00 0.505 0.677 0.665 2,013,084.75 2,013,084.75 2,010,725.71 1,997,398.69 1,990,735.79 1,977,411.18912828SY7 UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV497,793.00 0.73 0.959 1.408504,515.18504,515.18501,297.63494,288.71490,784.75483,777.84912828TS9 UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV993,086.00 0.631 1.047 1.734 1,011,117.58 1,010,308.05 1,001,696.54984,476.43975,867.83958,653.52912828VL1 UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV1,000,078.00 0.356 0.589 0.539 1,003,253.06 1,003,253.06 1,002,773.29997,382.86994,687.88989,298.36912828WQ9 UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV999,766.00 0.459 0.516 0.50 1,002,345.46 1,002,345.46 1,002,265.48997,266.65994,767.42989,769.3491412GUT0 UNIVERSITY CALIF REVSMUNI250,092.50 0.634 0.562 0.377250,622.39250,622.39250,563.93249,621.08249,149.69248,206.95928668AD4 VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICAFINANCE LLCCORP496,456.50 0.602 2.706 0.147497,916.18497,186.32496,821.40496,091.61495,726.73494,997.02949917397 WellsFargo:Htge MM;IMMFUND1,399,428.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,399,428.32 1,399,428.32 1,399,428.32 1,399,428.32 1,399,428.32 1,399,428.32CCYUSD ReceivableCASH225.38 0.00 0.00 0.00225.38225.38225.38225.38225.38225.38CCYUSD CashCASH-9.65 0.00 0.00 0.00-9.65-9.65-9.65-9.65-9.65-9.65---------44,269,211.16 0.575 0.817 0.423 44,437,364.65 44,420,480.78 44,360,477.31 44,175,542.92 44,081,874.96 43,894,539.82Shock AnalysisWC-Contra Costa County (19529)Base Currency: USD As of 12/31/2015Return to Table of ContentsDated: 01/11/201632March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes629 The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations provided via Clearwater Analytics for Wells Capital Management clients. Certain calculations may not be available for all timeperiods. Please refer to your custody statement for official portfolio holdings and transactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.DisclaimerAs of 12/31/2015Return to Table of ContentsDated: 01/11/201633March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes630 STATEMENT FOR PERIOD December 01, 2015 - December 31, 2015 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Date Transaction Shares Price Per Share Amount 201-000004-10 Average Cost NAV Average Cost Amount Realized Gain/Loss* CalTrust Short Term Fund 11/30/2015 BALANCE FORWARD 14,831,410.670 10.02 148,610,734.91 10.02430832 148,674,633.43 12/31/2015 UNREALIZED GAIN (LOSS) 0.000 -148,314.10 0.00 12/31/2015 ENDING BALANCE 14,831,410.670 10.01 148,674,633.43 148,462,420.81 INCOME DISTRIBUTION PAID - NOVEMBER 57,839.82 69,464.48INCOME ACCRUAL - DECEMBER -212,212.62CUMULATIVE UNREALIZED GAIN (LOSS) * Please note that this information should not be construed as tax advice and it is recommended that you consult with a tax professional regarding your account. For Inquiries About Your Account, Contact: Nottingham Investment Administration 116 South Franklin Street Rocky Mount, NC 27804 Attention: CalTRUST Shareholder Services Phone: 800.773.3863 Fax: 252-972-1908 Email: caltrustsupport@ncfunds.com CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ATTN: BELINDA ZHU 625 COURT STREET ROOM 102 MARTINEZ CA 94553-1281 Page 1 of 1March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 631 Caltrust Short Term Fund MONTH END PORTFOLIO STATISTICS December 31, 2015 CalTrust Short Term LAIF Market Value N/A$1,018,427,217.39 NAV per Share N/A$10.01 Yield 0.41%0.56% Period Total Return N/A-0.03% Period Yield Return 0.03%0.05% Effective Duration N/A0.48 yrs. Average Maturity 0.49 yrs.0.96 yrs. CalTrust Short Term Total Return CalTrust Short Term Yield Return LAIF Yield Return -0.03%0.03%0.05%One Month -0.01%0.09%0.13%Three Month 0.12%0.18%0.26%Six Month 0.39%0.32%0.49%One Year* 0.34%0.28%0.44%Two Year* 0.36%0.28%0.41%Three Year* 0.41%0.32%0.44%Five Year* 1.71%1.64%1.69%Ten Year* 1.84%1.76%1.82%Since Inception* *Annualized US Govt Agency 30.8% Corporate 29.6% Muni 14.2% MBS/ABS 13.9% MONEYMKT 4.9% SupraNational 4.5% COMPAPER 2.1% Total:100.0% Portfolio Sector Breakdown AA+28.3% AAA 27.4% A 14.5% AA-7.3% AA 6.6% A-1+6.4% A-5.1% A+3.9% SP-1+0.4% Total:100.0% Portfolio Quality Breakdown Disclosure to Performance Information This performance information is based on an inception date of February 13, 2005, when the CalTrust Short-Term portfolio commenced investment operations according to its investment objective , and does not include any investment returns from temporary investments held before the commencement of those operations. First-month index returns, February 13-28, 2005, are intra-period and were calculated by calculating the average daily return during the month and multiplying the average daily return by number of days in the shortened period. Performance was calculated net of investment advisory and program administration fees. The Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) is a diversified portfolio managed by the State of California for local governments and special districts. Performance for the CalTRUST Short Term Account is on a trade date basis. LAIF's monthly performance was calculated by taking the average monthly effective yield and dividing it by 365 then multiplying the result by the number of days in the month. Yield represents the 7-day net distribution on investments for the period. Rating source - Standard & Poor's. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 632 <<Back CalTrust Short Term Fund View Export Print Home Search Complete Listing Additional Ratings Effective Date: 12/31/2015 Go Ticker CUSIP Description S&P Rating 12/31/2015*Mat. Date Years Shares Price Value AX072916 0258M0DG1 AMERICAN EXPRESS CRE DIT 7/29/2016 1.3% A- 7/29/2016 0.6 959,000.00 100.1827 $960,752.09 AH100716 02665WAB7 AMERICAN HONDA FIN 1.125% 10/07/16 A+ 10/7/2016 0.8 4,000,000.00 100.0801 $4,003,204.00 AH121117 02665WAR2 AMERICAN HONDA FINAN CE 12/11/2017 0.545 A+ 12/11/2017 2.0 8,000,000.00 99.4166 $7,953,328.00 HN092017 02665WAY7 AMERICAN HONDA FINAN CE 9/20/2017 0.7626 A+ 9/20/2017 1.8 2,000,000.00 99.8884 $1,997,768.00 AN050116 03255LGX1 ANAHEIM FING AUTH-B 5/1/2016 1% AA- 5/1/2016 0.4 2,850,000.00 100.0280 $2,850,798.00 BA021417 06050TLU4 BANK OF AMERICA NA 2/14/2017 0.7061% A 2/14/2017 1.2 500,000.00 99.8401 $499,200.50 BA060517 06050TMB5 BANK OF AMERICA NA 06/05/2017 A 6/5/2017 1.5 2,250,000.00 99.6658 $2,242,480.50 BA111416 06050TLS9 BANK OF AMERICA NA 11/14/2016 0.7089% A 11/14/2016 0.9 2,200,000.00 99.9437 $2,198,761.40 BN021417 06050TLT7 BANK OF AMERICA NA 2/14/2017 1.25% A 2/14/2017 1.2 5,000,000.00 99.9064 $4,995,320.00 BO111416 06050TLR1 BANK OF AMERICA NA 11/14/2016 1.125% A 11/14/2016 0.9 4,000,000.00 99.8084 $3,992,336.00 BN011516 06406HBS7 BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON 2.5% 1/15/16 A 1/15/2016 0.1 2,000,000.00 100.0516 $2,001,032.00 BN072816 06406HBX6 BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON 2.3% 7/28/16 A 7/28/2016 0.6 3,947,000.00 100.8466 $3,980,415.30 BK011717 06406HCA5 BANK OF NEW YORK MEL LON CORPORA 01/17/17 A 1/17/2017 1.1 2,000,000.00 100.9443 $2,018,886.00 BA052218 06406HDC0 BANK OF NY MELLON 5/22/18 VARIABLE A 5/22/2018 2.4 5,000,000.00 99.8315 $4,991,575.00 BB031516 05531FAG8 BB&T CORPORATION 3/15/2016 3.2%A-3/15/2016 0.2 2,350,000.00 100.2735 $2,356,427.25 BR011218 084664CD1 BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY F IN 1/12/2018 0.5533 AA 1/12/2018 2.1 2,750,000.00 99.7717 $2,743,721.75 BR081516 084664BX8 BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY F IN 8/15/2016 0.95%AA 8/15/2016 0.7 1,105,000.00 100.0560 $1,105,618.80 Au042517 09658UAB5 BMWOT 2014-A A2 4/25/2017 0.53%AAA 4/25/2017 1.3 2,860,842.33 99.9226 $2,858,628.03 BA112016 097023BC8 BOEING CO 11/20/2016 3.75%A 11/20/2016 0.9 2,750,000.00 102.3610 $2,814,927.50 BB091316 10513KAB0 BRANCH BANKING & TRU ST 9/13/2016 0.5899 A-9/13/2016 0.8 2,000,000.00 99.7799 $1,995,598.00 BB120116 07330NAF2 BRANCH BANKING & TRU ST 12/1/2016 0.6743 A 12/1/2016 1.0 3,000,000.00 99.9560 $2,998,680.00 BT120116 07330NAG0 BRANCH BANKING & TRU ST 12/1/2016 1.05%A 12/1/2016 1.0 8,325,000.00 99.9349 $8,319,580.43 UN070141 91412GFA8 CA UNI-FLTG-TXB-Y-2 7/1/2041 0.656%AA 7/1/2017 1.6 4,250,000.00 99.9700 $4,248,725.00 CA120116 13066KW21 CALIFORNIA ST DEPT .991% 12/1/16 AAA 12/1/2016 1.0 1,250,000.00 100.0580 $1,250,725.00 CA040116 14912L4S7 CATERPILLAR FINANCIA L SE 4/1/2016 2.65%A 4/1/2016 0.3 1,550,000.00 100.4690 $1,557,269.50 CA090616 14912L5S6 CATERPILLAR FINANCIA L SE 9/6/2016 1.35%A 9/6/2016 0.8 3,000,000.00 100.3278 $3,009,834.00 Cr090718 17305EFE0 CCCIT 2013-A6 A6 9/7/2018 1.32%AAA 9/7/2018 2.8 4,250,000.00 100.1950 $4,258,287.50 CH041618 161571BC7 CHAIT 2006-A2 A2 4/16/2018 5.16%AAA 4/16/2018 2.3 2,426,000.00 100.4948 $2,438,003.85 Cr011519 161571GJ7 CHAIT 2014-A1 A1 1/15/2019 1.15%AAA 1/15/2019 3.1 13,000,000.00 99.9227 $12,989,951.00 CC030218 166764AW0 CHEVRON CORP 3/2/2018 0.432967%AA 3/2/2018 2.2 4,000,000.00 99.2848 $3,971,392.00 CI061518 17275RAY8 CISCO SYSTEMS INC 06/15/2018 AA-6/15/2018 2.5 5,500,000.00 99.7901 $5,488,455.50 C031017 172967HL8 CITIGROUP INC 3/10/2017 0.7744%A 3/10/2017 1.2 1,000,000.00 99.7589 $997,589.00 C040116 172967GP0 CITIGROUP INC 4/1/2016 1.3%A 4/1/2016 0.3 100,000.00 100.1410 $100,141.00 C042718 172967JQ5 CITIGROUP INC 4/27/2018 0.967%A 4/27/2018 2.3 5,000,000.00 99.5955 $4,979,775.00 C120718 172967KF7 CITIGROUP INC. 12/07/18 A 12/7/2018 3.0 3,000,000.00 99.6853 $2,990,559.00 CM061516 20030NAG6 COMCAST CORP 6/15/2016 4.95%A-6/15/2016 0.5 1,402,000.00 101.8033 $1,427,282.27 CR042718 22546QAW7 CREDIT SUISSE NEW YO RK 4/27/2018 0.9574 A 4/27/2018 2.3 5,500,000.00 99.5258 $5,473,919.00 DU050116 26362VFQ6 DUBLIN USD-TXB-BANS 5/1/2016 4.761%SP-1+5/1/2016 0.4 4,000,000.00 101.1970 $4,047,880.00 Ex020116 30229AB16 EXXON CORPORATION 02/01/16 A-1+2/1/2016 0.2 1,125,000.00 99.9688 $1,124,649.00 FM022717 3135G0XL2 FANNIE MAE 02/27/2017 0.65%AA+2/27/2017 1.2 3,660,000.00 99.5967 $3,645,239.22 FM092816 3135G0CM3 FANNIE MAE 1.25% 09/28/16 AA+9/28/2016 0.8 5,250,000.00 100.3624 $5,269,026.00 FN031016 3136FPET0 FANNIE MAE 3/10/2016 2%AA+3/10/2016 0.2 8,975,000.00 100.3315 $9,004,752.13 FF100316 313312J35 FED FARM CRD DISCOUN T NT 0% 10/03/16 A-1+10/3/2016 0.8 20,000,000.00 99.5260 $19,905,200.00 FF081616 3133EETK6 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS 08/16/16 AA+8/16/2016 0.7 3,000,000.00 99.9293 $2,997,879.00 FF112316 3133EEUS7 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 11/23/2016 0.6 AA+11/23/2016 0.9 21,000,000.00 99.9151 $20,982,171.00 ma011317 3133EFJK4 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS 01/13/17 AA+1/13/2017 1.1 10,000,000.00 99.6884 $9,968,840.00 FE063016 313384YU7 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BA NKS 06/30/16 AA+6/30/2016 0.5 20,000,000.00 99.7676 $19,953,520.00 FH012216 3130A3XU3 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BA NK 1/22/2016 0.25%A-1+1/22/2016 0.1 8,700,000.00 100.0058 $8,700,504.60 FH030916 313384UB3 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BA NKS 03/09/16 A-1+3/9/2016 0.2 10,000,000.00 99.9458 $9,994,580.00 FH031816 313382K85 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BA NK 3/18/2016 0.45%AA+3/18/2016 0.2 10,650,000.00 100.0090 $10,650,958.50 FH061016 313373SZ6 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BA NK 6/10/2016 2.125% AA+6/10/2016 0.5 5,000,000.00 100.6452 $5,032,260.00 FH080116 313384A41 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BA NKS 08/01/16 A-1+8/1/2016 0.7 3,885,000.00 99.6558 $3,871,627.83 FL092816 3130A2T97 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BA NK 9/28/2016 0.5%AA+9/28/2016 0.8 10,000,000.00 99.8245 $9,982,450.00 FL112316 3130A3J70 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BA NK 11/23/2016 0.625 AA+11/23/2016 0.9 30,000,000.00 99.8041 $29,941,230.00 FM091518 31394JTT4 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MO RTGAGE CORP 09/15/18 AA+9/15/2018 2.8 2,497,065.03 103.8890 $2,594,175.89 FN051617 3135G0ZD8 FEDERAL NATIONAL MOR TGAGE ASSOC 05/16/17 AA+5/16/2017 1.4 2,000,000.00 100.3858 $2,007,716.00 FB111816 31677QAZ2 FIFTH THIRD BANK 11/18/2016 0.7481%A-11/18/2016 0.9 8,360,000.00 99.9856 $8,358,796.16 FI022616 31677QAX7 FIFTH THIRD BANK 2/26/2016 0.9%A-2/26/2016 0.2 6,810,000.00 99.9998 $6,809,986.38 Au051518 31680GAB2 FITAT 2015-1 A2A MTGE 1.02% 05/15/18 Aaa 5/15/2018 2.4 10,400,000.00 99.7595 $10,374,988.00 FH031516 3134G4VH8 FREDDIE MAC 3/15/2016 0.4%AA+3/15/2016 0.2 10,000,000.00 100.0034 $10,000,340.00 FH041417 3134G6PN7 FREDDIE MAC 4/14/2017 0.8%AA+4/14/2017 1.3 10,000,000.00 100.0080 $10,000,800.00 FH110116 3134G3S50 FREDDIE MAC 11/1/2016 0.625%AA+11/1/2016 0.9 5,000,000.00 99.8663 $4,993,315.00 FM052617 3134G6E82 FREDDIE MAC 0.85% 05/26/2017 AA+5/26/2017 1.4 11,545,000.00 99.7692 $11,518,354.14 FM061617 3134G6W66 FREDDIE MAC 0.85% 06/16/2017 AA+6/16/2017 1.5 5,000,000.00 99.6675 $4,983,375.00 FM082516 3137EACW7 FREDDIE MAC 2.0 08/25/2016 AA+8/25/2016 0.7 15,000,000.00 100.8048 $15,120,720.00 FM092616 3134G4XW3 FREDDIE MAC 9/26/2016 0.6%AA+9/26/2016 0.8 2,500,000.00 99.8853 $2,497,132.50 FR052617 3134G6R70 FREDDIE MAC 0.75% 05/26/2017 AA+5/26/2017 1.4 5,000,000.00 99.5294 $4,976,470.00 GE042018 36159LCF1 GE DEALER FLOORPLAN MASTER NT 04/20/18 Aaa 4/20/2018 2.3 4,690,000.00 100.0005 $4,690,023.45 GE010917 36962G5N0 GENERAL ELEC CAP CORP 2.9% 1/9/2017 AA+1/9/2017 1.1 3,000,000.00 101.6660 $3,049,980.00 GE050916 36962G5C4 GENERAL ELEC CAP CORP 2.95% 5/9/16 AA+5/9/2016 0.4 8,842,000.00 100.6582 $8,900,198.04 CalTrust Portal March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 633 AA+5/11/2016 0.4 4,635,000.00 100.0004 $4,635,018.54 A-4/15/2016 0.3 4,395,000.00 100.5550 $4,419,392.25 A 2/7/2016 0.2 5,000,000.00 100.2535 $5,012,675.00 AAA 1/15/2019 3.1 4,539,618.31 99.6772 $4,524,964.42 AAA 11/21/2017 1.9 3,969,346.52 99.8202 $3,962,209.63 AAA 6/15/2017 1.5 4,104,083.92 99.9025 $4,100,082.44 8/1/2016 0.7 14,250,000.00 100.0460 $14,256,555.00 Aaa 7/16/2018 2.6 549,796.54 99.9056 $549,277.54 AAA 1/15/2019 3.1 8,240,631.66 99.8347 $8,227,009.90 AAA 7/23/2018 2.6 2,100,000.00 99.7313 $2,094,357.30 AAA 8/21/2017 1.7 2,000,000.00 99.8578 $1,997,156.00 A 1/19/2016 0.1 6,185,000.00 100.1639 $6,195,137.22 A 8/7/2018 2.7 2,000,000.00 99.9232 $1,998,464.00 A 11/13/2017 1.9 7,955,000.00 99.1755 $7,889,411.03 AA-7/22/2016 0.6 12,450,000.00 100.5981 $12,524,463.45 AA 1/1/2017 1.1 7,700,000.00 100.5410 $7,741,657.00 Aaa 10/18/2016 0.8 15,000,000.00 100.5625 $15,084,375.00 A+7/1/2016 0.6 6,000,000.00 99.9970 $5,999,820.00 AAA 5/16/2016 0.4 20,000,000.00 100.0177 $20,003,540.00 AAA 11/23/2016 0.9 10,000,000.00 100.0958 $10,009,580.00 AAA 7/19/2016 0.6 500,000.00 99.8090 $499,045.00 AAA 9/15/2016 0.8 15,000,000.00 100.2699 $15,040,485.00 AAA 10/14/2016 0.8 10,000,000.00 99.9776 $9,997,760.00 AAA 2/15/2018 2.2 6,628,442.57 99.8682 $6,619,706.28 Aaa 6/15/2018 2.5 4,500,000.00 99.7696 $4,489,632.00 A 1/16/2018 2.1 12,165,000.00 99.6294 $12,119,916.51 A-6/13/2016 0.5 6,650,000.00 99.8514 $6,640,118.10 A-1/15/2016 0.1 2,000,000.00 100.0418 $2,000,836.00 A-2/15/2017 1.2 1,500,000.00 99.9346 $1,499,019.00 A-3/1/2016 0.2 4,000,000.00 100.4172 $4,016,688.00 A-7/5/2016 0.6 1,500,000.00 101.0337 $1,515,505.50 A-11/25/2016 0.9 8,000,000.00 100.0012 $8,000,096.00 AA-8/1/2016 0.7 5,735,000.00 99.9400 $5,731,559.00 A+11/1/2016 0.9 10,965,000.00 100.1710 $10,983,750.15 AA-7/1/2016 0.6 1,000,000.00 100.0630 $1,000,630.00 AA-1/1/2016 0.1 1,980,000.00 100.0000 $1,980,000.00 AA 9/1/2016 0.8 1,405,000.00 100.1160 $1,406,629.80 A 7/25/2017 1.6 5,000,000.00 99.6877 $4,984,385.00 AAA 2/15/2017 1.2 2,325,918.83 99.9688 $2,325,193.14 AAA 1/16/2018 2.1 10,000,000.00 99.7584 $9,975,840.00 AAA 2/15/2017 1.2 258,728.97 99.9572 $258,618.24 AAA 6/15/2018 2.5 2,050,000.00 99.7706 $2,045,297.30 AA 10/1/2016 0.8 2,780,000.00 99.9270 $2,777,970.60 AA 10/1/2016 0.8 2,520,000.00 99.9410 $2,518,513.20 A 1/5/2018 2.1 7,938,000.00 99.9179 $7,931,482.90 A 4/29/2016 0.3 2,000,000.00 100.8465 $2,016,930.00 A+6/6/2016 0.5 680,000.00 100.9191 $686,249.88 AAA 4/17/2017 1.3 5,152,745.41 99.8590 $5,145,480.03 Aaa 6/15/2017 1.5 2,048,536.75 99.9312 $2,047,127.35 AAA 9/15/2017 1.8 4,678,962.20 99.8938 $4,673,993.15 A-4/1/2016 0.3 2,000,000.00 100.4883 $2,009,766.00 A 1/1/2016 0.1 12,000,000.00 100.0000 $12,000,000.00 AAA 2/15/2017 1.2 3,685,000.00 99.9980 $3,684,926.30 AAA 3/15/2016 0.2 10,000,000.00 100.0170 $10,001,700.00 AAA 3/15/2016 0.2 2,500,000.00 100.0320 $2,500,800.00 A-1+2/1/2016 0.2 2,000,000.00 100.0170 $2,000,340.00 AA 8/15/2016 0.7 750,000.00 100.0300 $750,225.00 AA 2/1/2016 0.2 10,930,000.00 100.0150 $10,931,639.50 A 6/1/2018 2.5 3,000,000.00 99.5237 $2,985,711.00 A 1/27/2017 1.1 12,735,000.00 99.6624 $12,692,006.64 AA-6/15/2016 0.5 2,000,000.00 100.0340 $2,000,680.00 AA-12/15/2016 1.0 3,545,000.00 100.0730 $3,547,587.85 AA 2/1/2017 1.2 800,000.00 99.8660 $798,928.00 A 9/1/2016 0.8 2,090,000.00 99.9270 $2,088,474.30 AA-7/1/2016 0.6 10,000,000.00 99.9000 $9,990,000.00 AA-10/1/2016 0.8 5,125,000.00 100.1530 $5,132,841.25 AAA 8/14/2017 1.7 3,152,201.72 99.8179 $3,146,461.56 AAA 1/17/2017 1.1 459,727.83 99.9579 $459,534.28 AAA 12/15/2017 2.0 1,076,199.23 99.7888 $1,073,926.29 AAA 12/15/2016 1.0 89,939.85 99.9733 $89,915.84 AAA 7/17/2017 1.6 5,537,052.62 99.9157 $5,532,384.88 AAA 2/15/2018 2.2 5,550,000.00 99.8481 $5,541,569.55 AA 10/27/2017 1.8 1,500,000.00 99.6274 $1,494,411.00 A-1+3/1/2016 0.2 20,000,000.00 99.9248 $19,984,960.00 AA-1/11/2016 0.1 1,000,000.00 100.0288 $1,000,288.00 AA-1/12/2018 2.1 13,000,000.00 99.4370 $12,926,810.00 AA-9/15/2016 0.8 895,000.00 100.8071 $902,223.55 A+9/26/2016 0.8 4,575,000.00 100.2446 $4,586,190.45 A+9/26/2016 0.8 2,515,000.00 99.9987 $2,514,967.31 AA 5/15/2016 0.4 1,830,000.00 100.0370 $1,830,677.10 AA 7/1/2017 1.6 10,880,000.00 99.9700 $10,876,736.00 A+11/15/2016 0.9 1,365,000.00 100.9639 $1,378,157.24 AA-1/26/2018 2.1 4,500,000.00 99.5123 $4,478,053.50 GE051116 36962G2V5 GENERAL ELEC CAP CORP 05/11/2016 SO041516 373334JV4 GEORGIA POWER COMPAN Y 4/15/2016 3% GS020716 38143USC6 GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC 3.625% 2/7/16 HD011519 41284CAB0 HARLEY-DAVIDSON 0.8% 01/15/19 Au122117 43813JAC9 HAROT 2014-1 A3 12/21/2017 0.67% Au071717 43814KAB7 HAROT 2015-1 A2 7/17/2017 0.7% HI080116 4197915E4 HAWAII-TXBL-REF-ES 8/1/2016 0.731% Au071618 41283YAC1 HDMOT 2013-1 A3 7/16/2018 0.65% Au011519 41284BAB2 HDMOT 2015-1 A2A 1/15/2019 0.95% HA072318 43814LAB5 HONDA AUTO RECEIV- ABLES 07/23/18 HA082117 43813NAB2 HONDA AUTO RECEIV- ABLES 08/21/2017 HS011916 40429CFN7 HSBC FINANCE CORP SR NT 01/19/2016 5.5% HB080718 40428HPW6 HSBC USA INC 8/7/2018 1.0809% HB111317 40428HPM8 HSBC USA INC 11/13/2017 0.57185% IB072216 459200GX3 IBM CORP 7/22/2016 1.95% ID010117 45656TAQ1 INDUSTRY PUB FACS-A 1/1/2017 1.764% IA101816 4581X0BS6 INTER-AMERICAN DEVEL BK 10/18/2016 1.375 IN070116 45884AZN6 INTERMOUNTAIN PWR-B 7/1/2016 0.785% IB051616 459058DM2 INTERNATIONAL BANK F OR RECONSTR 05/16/16 KO112316 45950KBQ2 INTERNATIONAL FINANC E CORPORATI 11/23/16 IB071916 45905U7F5 INTL BK RECON & DEVE LOP 07/19/2016 0.45% IB091516 459058BS1 INTL BK RECON & DEVE LOP 9/15/2016 1% IB101416 459058DS9 INTL BK RECON & DEVE LOP 10/14/2016 0.62 Ot021518 47787UAB9 JDOT 2015-A A2A 2/15/2018 0.87% Ot061518 47787WAB5 JDOT 2015-B A2 06/15/2018 0.98% DC011618 24422ESU4 JOHN DEERE CAPITAL C ORP 1/16/2018 0.543 JP061316 48121CJM9 JP MORGAN CHASE BANK NA 6/13/2016 0.6101 JP011516 46625HHW3 JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 2.6% 1/15/16 JP021517 46623EJZ3 JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 2/15/2017 0.750933% JP030116 46625HHX1 JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 3/1/2016 3.45% JP070516 46625HJA9 JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 7/5/2016 3.15% KE112516 49327M2E3 KEY BANK NA 11/25/2016 0.7516% LD080116 54465AFK3 LA CO REDEV-B-TXBL 8/1/2016 1.074% LO110116 544587B72 LOS ANGELES CALIF MU N IMPT CORP 11/01/16 LA070116 5446462D3 LOS ANGELES SD-L-TXB L 7/1/2016 0.68% LO010116 5446462Q4 LOS ANGELES SD-L-TXB L 1/1/2016 0.486% MA090116 562785LC7 MANHATTAN BEACH CA .856% 9/1/16 MA072517 55279HAH3 MANUF & TRADERS TRUS T CO 7/25/2017 0.53 AB021517 58768LAB9 MBALT 2015-A A2A 2/15/2017 0.78% Au011618 58769AAB2 MBALT 2015-B A2A 1% 01/16/18 Au021517 587729AB0 MBART 2014-1 A2 2/15/2017 0.43% MB061518 58772PAB4 MERCEDES BENZ AUTO R ECEIVABLES 06/15/18 MI100116 605581FW2 MISSISSIPPI ST-B-TXB L 10/1/2016 0.64% MS100116 605581EP8 MISSISSIPPI ST-D-REF 10/1/2016 0.64% MO010518 61761JVN6 MORGAN STANLEY 1/5/2018 1.007098% MS042916 61747YDD4 MORGAN STANLEY 3.8% 04/29/16 UN060616 90520EAC5 MUFG UNION BANK NA 6/6/2016 3% Au041717 65490BAB1 NALT 2014-B A2A 4/17/2017 0.73% Au061517 65477WAB2 NAROT 2014-B A2 6/15/2017 0.6% Au091517 65477UAB6 NAROT 2015-A A2 9/15/2017 0.67% CM040116 63946BAC4 NBCUNIVERSAL MEDIA L LC 4/1/2016 2.875% NE010116 63968AXN0 NE PUB PWR DIST-B 1/1/2016 0.48% NY021517 64990EJ32 NEW YORK ST DORM AUT 2/15/17 .93% NE031516 650035K56 NEW YORK ST URBAN DE V 3/15/2016 0.63% NY031516 64990ERF6 NY DORM AUTH-D-TXBL 3/15/2016 0.66% OA020116 672211BC2 OAKLAND COLISEUM-A 2/1/2016 0.8% OC081516 675371AS7 OCEANSIDE PENSION-RE F 8/15/2016 1.406% OR020116 68428LDH4 ORANGE CNTY -TXBL-A 2/1/2016 0.68% PB060118 69353REN4 PNC BANK NA 06/01/2018 PN012717 69353RCG1 PNC BANK NA 1/27/2017 1.125% PO061516 738798BC0 POWAY REDEV AGY-B 6/15/2016 0.95% PO121516 738798BD8 POWAY REDEV AGY-B 12/15/2016 1.1% RI020117 762494QV7 RIALTO USD-TXBL 2/1/2017 1.258% RI090116 76912TJC8 RIVERSIDE PUB FIN-RE F 9/1/2016 1% SD070116 7973552R4 SAN DIEGO CALIF UNI SCH DIST 07/01/16 SA100116 79876CAV0 SAN MARCOS CA REDEV 1.09% 10/1/16 Au081417 78448MAB3 SMAT 2015-1US A2A 8/14/2017 0.99% Au011717 89236RAC3 TAOT 2013-A A3 1/17/2017 0.55% AT121517 89231MAC9 TAOT 2014-A A3 12/15/2017 0.67% TO121516 89231RAB0 TAOT 2014-B A2 12/15/2016 0.4% AT071717 89236WAB4 TAOT 2015-A A2 7/17/2017 0.71% Au021518 89231TAB6 TAOT 2015-C A2A 2/15/2018 0.93% KO102717 191216BR0 THE COCA-COLA COMPAN Y 10/27/17 To030116 89116EC19 TORONTO DOMINION HOL DINGS USA I 03/01/16 TM011116 89233P4R4 TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP 2.8% 1/11/16 TO011218 89236TCB9 TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP 1/12/2018 0.57 TO091516 89233P5E2 TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP 9/15/2016 2% UB092616 90521APH5 UNION BANK NA 9/26/2016 1.5% UN092616 90521APG7 UNION BANK NA 9/26/2016 0.9996% UN051516 91412GUT0 UNIV OF CALIFORNIA-A N 5/15/2016 0.634% UC070141 91412GEZ4 UNIVERSITY CALIF REVS 07/01/2041** US111516 91159HHB9 US BANCORP 11/15/2016 2.2% US012618 90331HMR1 US BANK NA CINCINNAT I 1/26/2018 0.55572 US013017 90331HMD2 US BANK NA CINCINNAT I 1/30/2017 0.4661%AA-1/30/2017 1.1 5,000,000.00 99.9550 $4,997,750.00 CalTrust Portal March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 634 T022916 912828B82 US TREASURY N/B 2/29/2016 0.25%AA+2/29/2016 0.2 2,000,000.00 99.9922 $1,999,844.00 T043016 912828C81 US TREASURY N/B 4/30/2016 0.375%AA+4/30/2016 0.3 20,000,000.00 99.9883 $19,997,660.00 T083116 912828RF9 US TREASURY N/B 8/31/2016 1%AA+8/31/2016 0.7 30,000,000.00 100.2031 $30,060,930.00 TN51516 912828VC1 US TREASURY N/B 5/15/2016 0.25%AA+5/15/2016 0.4 7,980,000.00 99.9297 $7,974,390.06 TR033116 912828C40 US TREASURY N/B 0.375% 03/31/16 AA+3/31/2016 0.2 15,000,000.00 100.0039 $15,000,585.00 Au121517 90290KAC9 USAOT 2014-1 A3 12/15/2017 0.58%AAA 12/15/2017 2.0 1,466,097.06 99.8389 $1,463,735.18 Au031518 90290XAB3 USAOT 2015-1 A2 3/15/2018 0.82%AAA 3/15/2018 2.2 11,430,000.00 99.8459 $11,412,386.37 Au042018 92867PAC7 VALET 2013-2 A3 4/20/2018 0.7%AAA 4/20/2018 2.3 4,071,030.42 99.5225 $4,051,591.25 VC091516 92343VBN3 VERIZON COMMUNICATIO NS 9/15/2016 2.5%A 9/15/2016 0.8 6,500,000.00 100.7803 $6,550,719.50 VZ060917 92343VCD4 VERIZON COMMUNICATIO NS 6/9/2017 0.6306% A 6/9/2017 1.5 1,000,000.00 99.5787 $995,787.00 VZ091516 92343VBL7 VERIZON COMMUNICATIO NS 9/15/2016 1.7823 A 9/15/2016 0.8 1,925,000.00 100.6123 $1,936,786.78 Au042017 92867QAD3 VWALT 2014-A A3 4/20/2017 0.8%AAA 4/20/2017 1.3 7,023,042.46 99.7238 $7,003,644.82 Au062017 92867VAB6 VWALT 2015-A A2A 6/20/2017 0.87%AAA 6/20/2017 1.5 1,477,980.33 99.8075 $1,475,135.22 VPWF3801 VP7000236 WELLS FARGO ADVANT- AGE HERITAGE AAA 1/1/2016 0.1 49,409,692.00 100.0000 $49,409,692.00 Grand Total $1,018,427,217.39 *Security ratings are updated monthly at month-end. CalTrust Portal **Mandatory put on 7/1/17 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 635 SECTION III APPENDIX B. INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO DETAIL – MANAGED BY OUTSIDE CONTRACTED PARTIES B. 3. EAST BAY REGIONAL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM AUTHORITY (EBRCS) March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 636 EBRCS TRANSACTIONS* For the Quarter Ending December 31, 2015 FY 2015-2016 FUND BALANCE @ TJ/Date TJ/Date TJ/Date TJ/Date TJ/Date TJ/Date BALANCE @ NUMBER 09/30/15 12/31/15 100300 2,232,756.90 2,232,756.90 TOTALS 2,232,756.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,232,756.90 * East Bay Regional Communications System Authority March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 637 EXHIBITS March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 638 Exhibit ICONTRA COSTA COUNTYPortfolio Summary ReportAS OF DECEMBER 31, 2015Portfolio CharacteristicsPar$3,223,855,273.60Cost$3,224,114,720.65Market Value$3,222,613,057.91Weighted Yield to Maturity0.64%Weighted Average Days to Maturity228Weighted Duration0.62yrPortfolio Breakdown by InvestmentInvestmentsPar Value Percent of TotalU.S. Treasuries$37,620,000.001.17%U.S.Agencies-Federal, State and Local623,828,000.0019.35%Money Market1,755,243,654.0954.45%ABS/MBS4,562,799.150.14%Corporate Notes149,457,000.004.64%Outside Contractors-LAIF209,721,646.146.51%Outside Contractors-Other 194,951,062.726.05%Cash248,471,111.507.71%TOTAL*$3,223,855,273.60 100.00% **Maturity DistributionTimePar Value Percent of TotalLess 1 yr$2,590,967,140.8280.37%1 to 2 yrs297,694,168.909.23%2 to 3 yrs274,174,802.658.50%3 to 4 yrs56,876,404.331.76%4+ yrs4,142,756.900.13%TOTAL* $3,223,855,273.60 100.00% *** Does not include the Futuris Public Entity Trust of the Contra Costa Community College District Retirement Board of Authority** May or may not total to 100% due to roundingU.S. Treasuries1.17%U.S.Agencies‐Federal, State and Local19.35%Money Market54.45%ABS/MBS0.14%Corporate Notes4.64%Outside Contractors‐LAIF6.51%Outside Contractors‐Other 6.05%Cash7.71%PORTFOLIO BREAKDOWNBY INVESTMENTLess 1 yr80.37%1 to 2 yrs9.23%2 to 3 yrs8.50%3 to 4 yrs1.76%4+ yrs0.13%MATURITY DISTRIBUTIONMarch 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes639 Exhibit IICONTRA COSTA COUNTY INVESTMENT POOLPERFORMANCE SUMMARYAS OF DECEMBER 31, 2015AVERAGE DAYS TO3 PERCENT OFMATURITY AT PARPORTFOLIOYTMEND-OF-QUARTERDURATION($)(%)(%)(day)(year)A. Investments Managed by Treasurer's Office$2,570,711,453.24 79.80% 0.6955%2800.751B. Investments Managed by Outside Contractors1. Local Agency Investment Fund$209,721,646.14 6.51%0.3800%1N/A2. Othera.Wells Capital Management$44,255,885.01 1.37%0.8170%2770.422b. CalTRUST (Short-Term Fund)$148,462,420.81 4.61%0.5600%1N/AC. Cash$248,471,111.50 7.71%0.3500%41N/A3 Yield to Maturity on Portfolio at End-of-Quarter = 0.64%3 Weighted Average Days to Maturity on Portfolio at End-of-Quarter = 2283 Weighted Duration at End-of-Quarter = 0.62 yr1. Data is provided by Sungard.2. Data is provided by Wells Cap Management.3. Excludes: Section B.2.a (EBRCS Bond) of the Investment Pool summary report and Futuris Public Entity Trust4. Earnings Credit Rate on Investable BalanceLAIF and CalTRUST Short-Term are subject to a one day call of principal provision.WEIGHTEDMarch 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes640 Exhibit IIICONTRA COSTA COUNTY INVESTMENT POOLAs of December 31, 2015As of September 30, 2015CHANGE IN VALUETYPEPAR VALUEPAR VALUEFROM PREV. QTR.% CHANGEA. Investments Managed by Treasurer's Office1.U.S. Treasuries (STRIPS, Bills, Notes)$37,620,000.00$29,160,000.00 $8,460,000.0029.01%2. U.S. AgenciesFederal Agriculture Mortgage Corporation0.000.000.000.00%Federal Home Loan Banks235,002,000.00223,502,000.00 11,500,000.005.15%Federal National Mortgage Association92,526,000.00102,316,000.00 (9,790,000.00)-9.57%Federal Farm Credit Banks174,036,000.00124,211,000.00 49,825,000.0040.11%Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation116,709,000.0082,142,000.00 34,567,000.0042.08%Municipal Bonds5,555,000.007,225,000.00 (1,670,000.00)-23.11%Subtotal623,828,000.00539,396,000.00 84,432,000.0015.65%3. Money Market InstrumentsBankers Acceptances0.000.000.000.00%Repurchase Agreement0.000.000.000.00%Commercial Paper955,477,000.00612,848,000.00 342,629,000.0055.91%Negotiable Certificates of Deposit794,998,000.00495,732,000.00 299,266,000.0060.37%Medium Term Certificates of Deposit4,200,000.002,025,000.00 2,175,000.00107.41%Money Market Accounts565,318.32565,318.320.000.00%Time Deposit3,335.773,335.770.000.00%Subtotal1,755,243,654.091,111,173,654.09 644,070,000.0057.96%4. Asset Backed Securities/Mortgage Backed Securities4,562,799.154,595,000.00 2,093,548.49100.00%5. Corporate Notes149,457,000.00161,007,000.00 (11,550,000.00)-7.17%TOTAL2,570,711,453.241,845,331,654.09 725,379,799.1539.31%B. Investments Managed by Outside Contractors1. Local Agency Investment Fund209,721,646.14195,505,003.78 14,216,642.367.27%2. Othera.EBRCS Bond2,232,756.902,232,756.900.000.00%b. Wells Capital Management44,255,885.0144,187,952.4267,932.590.15%c.CalTRUST (Short-Term Fund)148,462,420.81148,585,809.69(123,388.88)-0.08%Subtotal194,951,062.72195,006,519.01 (55,456.29)-0.03%TOTAL404,672,708.86390,511,522.79 14,161,186.073.63%C. Cash248,471,111.50129,644,735.27 118,826,376.2391.66%* GRAND TOTAL (FOR A , B, & C)$3,223,855,273.60$2,365,487,912.15 $858,367,361.4536.29%* Does not include the Futuris Public Entity Trust of the Contra Costa Community College District Retirement Board of AuthorityMarch 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes641 CONTRA COSTA INVESTMENT POOLINVESTMENTS MANAGED BY TREASURER'S OFFICEQUARTERLY COUPON RATES, YIELD TO MATURITYExhibit IV Quarter EndingFiscal Year September December March June2015/16Coupon Rate0.6433% 0.7270%Yield to Maturity0.5859% 0.6955%2014/15Coupon Rate0.5437% 0.4624% 0.4912% 0.5309%Yield to Maturity0.4605% 0.4185% 0.4379% 0.4894%2013/14Coupon Rate0.6331% 0.4843% 0.4686% 0.4802%Yield to Maturity0.4645% 0.3709% 0.3680% 0.3877%2012/13Coupon Rate0.8304% 0.5568% 0.5829% 0.5838%Yield to Maturity0.6012% 0.3947% 0.4243% 0.4229%2011/12Coupon Rate0.8769% 0.8385% 0.8122% 0.7426%Yield to Maturity0.6842% 0.6658% 0.6739% 0.6130%2010/11Coupon Rate0.9802% 0.7132% 0.7326% 0.6982%Yield to Maturity0.7494% 0.5866% 0.6133% 0.5612%2009/10Coupon Rate1.2464% 0.8931% 0.8610% 0.8212%Yield to Maturity1.1095% 0.7840% 0.7373% 0.6993%2008/09Coupon Rate4.4019% 1.7623% 1.2918% 1.2418%Yield to Maturity4.2819% 1.6574% 1.1808% 1.1231%2007/08Coupon Rate5.1675% 4.6491% 3.3805% 2.9712%Yield to Maturity5.2022% 4.6583% 3.3454% 2.9048%2006/07Coupon Rate5.1683% 5.1819% 5.2384% 5.2407%Yield to Maturity5.2286% 5.2229% 5.2766% 5.2705%2005/06Coupon Rate3.6925% 4.1660% 4.6328% 5.0427%Yield to Maturity3.6818% 4.1594% 4.6358% 5.0821%Source: All data is calculated by Sungard.March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes642 CONTRA COSTA INVESTMENT POOLINVESTMENTS MANAGED BY OUTSIDE CONTRACTORLAIF QUARTERLY APPORTIONMENT RATESExhibit IV (a)Quarter EndingFiscal Year September December March June2015/16 Apportionment Rate 0.32% 0.37%2014/15 Apportionment Rate 0.24% 0.25% 0.26% 0.28%2013/14 Apportionment Rate 0.26% 0.26% 0.23% 0.22%2012/13 Apportionment Rate 0.35% 0.32% 0.28% 0.24%2011/12 Apportionment Rate 0.38% 0.38% 0.38% 0.36%2010/11 Apportionment Rate 0.51% 0.46% 0.50% 0.48%2009/10 Apportionment Rate 0.90% 0.60% 0.56% 0.56%2008/09 Apportionment Rate 2.77% 2.54% 1.91% 1.51%2007/08 Apportionment Rate 5.24% 4.96% 4.18% 3.11%2006/07 Apportionment Rate 4.93% 5.11% 5.17% 5.23%2005/06 Apportionment Rate 3.18% 3.63% 4.03% 4.53%Source: Contra Costa County Treasurer's Quarterly Investment Report - LAIF StatementsMarch 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes643 Exhibit IV (b)0.00%0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%2.50%3.00%3.50%4.00%4.50%5.00%5.50%Contra Costa County Investment Poolas of December 31, 2015TTC "Coupon"TTC "YTM"LAIFMarch 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes644 Exhibit IV (c)-2.00%-1.00%0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%12/31/15 6/28/16 12/25/16 6/23/17 12/20/17 6/18/18 12/15/18 6/13/19 12/10/19 6/7/20 12/4/20Yield to Maturity Maturity DatesRisk Assessmentas of December 31, 2015CountyTreasurerWells CapitalMgmtUS TreasuriesYield Curve2 Standard Deviations1 Standard Deviation-1 Standard Deviation-2 Standard Deviations1 year2 years3 years5 yearsMarch 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes645 Risk Assessment(Securities Greater Than Two Standard Deviations) As of December 31, 2015Exhibit IV (d)CUSIPDESCRIPTIONPURCHASE DATEPARCOST MARKETCOUPON (%)MATURITY DATEYTM (%)204712FD0 AUHSD MUNI COMPTONCA CNTY REDEV1/3/12110,000.00 7,453.00 7,453.00 0.008/1/166.53928668AD4VOLKSWAGEN GROUP AMERICA35/23/14500,000.00 500,000.00 496,780.20 0.555/23/162.71167486JC4 AUHSD MUNI CHICAGO UNREF CALL6/27/132390,000.00 421,318.77 421,318.77 5.00 1/1/17 2.5936962GU51 CORP GENERAL ELEC CA 3/8/13 10,000,000.00 9,952,450.00 10,000,000.00 0.52 1/8/16 2.393134A4ZT4 WT GOV FHLMC NOTES 2/25/11 155,000.00 172,267.00 155,289.85 4.75 1/19/16 2.3345905U7F5IBRD36/26/15 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 995,012.50 0.45 7/19/16 1.78836496NW5 AUHSD MUNI SOUTH BEND IN CMNTY SCH6/27/132505,000.00 547,506.38 547,506.38 5.00 1/15/16 1.621. Date when the security was transferred from AUHSD to Contra Costa County Investment Pool Managed by Treasurer's Office.2.Date when the security was transferred from AUHSD's Fund 5055 to Fund 5057 per District's request.3. Security purchased by Wells Cap Management.March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes646 Exhibit VAVERAGE DAYSAVERAGE DAILY TO MATURITY AVERAGE DAYS TOBALANCE PERCENT OF AVERAGE AS A PERCENT MATURITY FOR (PAR)PORTFOLIOYTMOF PORTFOLIOTHE QUARTERA. Investments Managed by Treasurer's Office$2,074,946,319.3678.18%0.6043%217.87279B. Investments Managed by Outside Contractors1. Local Agency Investment Fund$190,301,317.547.17%0.3770%0.0712.Othera.Wells Capital Management$44,225,233.981.67%0.6840%4.99299b.CalTRUST Short Term Fund$137,378,057.405.18%0.5300%0.051c.Cash$207,120,144.287.80%0.2083%0.081Total $2,653,971,072.56 100.00%* Weighted Average YTM of Portfolio =0.55%223* Excludes: Section B.2.a (EBRCS Bond) of the Investment Pool Summary and Futuris Public Entity TrustLAIF and CalTRUST Short Term Fund are subject to a one day call of principal provisionCONTRA COSTA COUNTY INVESTMENT POOL AVERAGE INFORMATIONOctober 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes647 Exhibit V (a)CONTRA COSTA COUNTY INVESTMENT POOLSUMMARY OF POOL RATES AND BENCHMARKSAS OF DECEMBER 31, 2015AveragePool Rates:YTM as ofQuarterlyDays to12/31/15Ave.MaturityTotal County Portfolio (w/o Cash)0.64%0.55%257*1Investments Managed by Treasurer's Office0.70%0.60%279Wells Capital Management 0.82%0.68%299CalTRUST Short Term Fund0.56%0.53%376*2QuarterlyPMIA Ave.ApportionmentEffective RateYieldLocal Agency Investment Fund (LAIF)0.37%0.38%210*210/1/15 - 12/31/15Benchmarks:12/31/15High Ave.LowFederal Fund Rate0.2500% 0.3500% 0.1592% 0.0600%Six Month Treasury Bill0.1625% 0.2475% 0.1383% 0.0075%Six Month LIBOR0.8462% 0.8462% 0.6312% 0.5159%Vanguard Prime Money Mkt Fund0.0500%*1. Cash is excluded from the calculation.*2. Average days to maturity (with a one day call of principal provision)March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes648 Exhibit V (b)0.0000%1.0000%2.0000%3.0000%4.0000%5.0000%6.0000%Contra Costa County Investment PoolAverage Quarterly YTMas of December 31, 2015TreasurerLAIFWells CapitalMgmtCalTRUSTMarch 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes649 Exhibit VIPurchase CouponDescriptionCUSIPDateRateParMarket CostProvisionsFund #*GECC Float Rate Note 1/8/16 36962GU51 3/8/13 0.5180% $10,000,000.00 $10,000,000.00 $9,952,450.00 Float quarterly: LIBOR +20 bps 8177Chicago Unrefunded MUNI 1/1/17 167486JC4 6/27/201315.0000%$390,000.00 $421,318.77 $421,318.77 One time: 1/1/165057Chicago Prerefunded MUNI 1/1/17167486JB6 6/27/201315.0000%$170,000.00 $189,542.34 $189,542.34 One time: 1/1/165057Berkshire Hath Float Rate 1/10/17084664CA7 1/10/14 0.4706%$500,000.00 $499,780.00 $500,000.00 Float quarterly: LIBOR +15 bps 6911Svenska Handelsbanken Float CD 8/24/17 86958DH54 11/24/15 0.8280%$1,340,000.00 $1,340,000.00 $1,340,000.00 Float quarterly: LIBOR +45 bps6911HSBC BK Float CD 11/17/1740428AR41 11/18/15 0.9541%$2,175,000.00 $2,175,000.00 $2,175,000.00 Float quarterly: LIBOR +59 bps6911Intel Structured Callable 12/15/17458140AL4 1/27/14 1.3500%$5,211,000.00 $5,217,930.63 $5,179,629.78 Make-whole call +12.5 bps until 12/15/178177FNMA Callable Multi-Step Up 5/22/183136G1M63 5/22/13 0.7500%$10,000,000.00 $10,001,300.00 $10,000,000.00 Quarterly; First: 11/22/13; Last: 2/22/18; 0.75% to 81775/22/16; 1% to 5/22/17; 2% to 11/22/17; 3% thereafterFNMA Callable 5/25/183136G2K71 5/27/15 1.2500%$10,000,000.00 $10,015,400.00 $10,000,000.00 One time: 5/25/168177FNMA Callable Mult-Step Up 6/12/183136G1MU0 6/12/13 1.0000%$5,000,000.00 $5,005,050.00 $4,997,950.00 Quarterly; First: 12/12/13; Last: 3/12/18; 0.8% to 81776/12/14; 0.85% to 6/12/15; 1% to 6/12/16; 1.25% to6/12/17; 1.5% to 12/12/17; 3% to 6/12/18BB&T Corp Callable 2/1/1905531FAQ6 9/29/15 2.2500%$1,960,000.00 $1,967,702.80 $1,987,430.20 Call anytime on or after 1/2/197903Total$46,746,000.00* Fund #5057 Acalanes Unified High School District6911 Contra Costa County Schools Insurance Group7903 Contra Costa Community College District Retiree Health Benefits8177 County (Pool)1. Date when the security was transferred from AUHSD's Fund 5055 to Fund 5057 per District's requestCONTRA COSTA COUNTYTREASURER'S INVESTMENT PORTFOLIOSTRUCTURED SECURITIESDecember 31, 2015March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes650 Exhibit VI (a)DESCRIPTIONCUSIPMATURITY DATEPARMARKETCOSTPROVISIONS($)($)($)AMERICAN HONDAFIN 1.125% 10/07/16 02665WAB7 10/7/2016 4,000,000.00 4,003,204.004,022,240.00Make‐whole call +10 bpsAMERICAN HONDA FINANCE 9/20/2017 0.7626 02665WAY79/20/2017 2,000,000.00 1,997,768.002,000,000.00Float quarterly: LIBOR +45 bpsAMERICAN HONDA FINANCE 12/11/2017 0.545 02665WAR2 12/11/2014 8,000,0007,953,328.008,000,000.00Float quarterly: LIBOR +31 bpsANAHEIM FING AUTH-B 5/1/2016 1%03255LGX15/1/20162,850,0002,850,798.002,850,000.00Make‐whole call BANK OF AMERICA NA 11/14/2016 0.7089%06050TLS911/14/2016 2,200,000.00          2,198,761.402,200,000.00Float quarterly: LIBOR +47 bpsBANK OF AMERICA NA 2/14/2017 0.7061%06050TLU42/14/2017 500,000.00                499,200.50500,000.00 Float quarterly: LIBOR +47 bps BANK OF AMERICA NA 06/05/201706050TMB56/5/2017 2,250,000.00            2,242,480.502,250,000.00Float quarterly: LIBOR +45 bpsBANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORPORA 01/17/17 06406HCA5 1/17/2017 2,000,000.00 2,018,886.002,036,280.00Call on anytime on or after 12/18/16BANK OF NY MELLON 5/22/18 VARIABLE06406HDC05/22/2018 5,000,000.00            4,991,575.004,998,500.00Float quarterly: LIBOR +38 bpsBB&T CORPORATION 3/15/2016 3.2%05531FAG83/15/2016 2,350,000.00 2,356,427.252,401,026.00Call anytime on or after 2/16/16BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY FIN 8/15/2016 0.95% 084664BX8 8/15/2016 1,105,000.00 1,105,618.801,105,552.50Make‐whole call +7.5 bpsBERKSHIRE HATHAWAY FIN 1/12/2018 0.5533 084664CD1 1/12/2018 2,750,000.00 2,743,721.752,750,000.00Float quarterly: LIBOR +30 bpsBMWOT 2014-A A2 4/25/2017 0.53%09658UAB54/25/20172,860,842.33 2,858,628.032,860,745.635% clean up callBRANCH BANKING & TRUST  12/1/2016 0.6743 07330NAF212/1/20163,000,000.00 2,998,680.003,001,780.00Float quarterly: LIBOR +43 bps; Call after 11/1/16BRANCH BANKING & TRUST 12/1/2016 1.05% 07330NAG012/1/20168,125,000.00 8,319,580.438,135,667.00Call anytime after 11/1/16BRANCH BANKING & TRUST 9/13/2016 0.5899 10513KAB09/13/20162,000,000.00 1,995,598.001,994,850.00Float quarterly: LIBOR +32 bpsCA UNI-FLTG-TXB-Y-2 7/1/2041 0.656%91412GFA87/1/20174,250,000.00 4,248,725.004,249,500.00Float monthly: US0001M +50 bpsCALIFORNIA ST DEPT .991% 12/1/1613066KW2112/1/20161,250,000.00 1,250,725.001,251,250.00Make‐whole call +20 bpsCCCIT 2013-A6 A6 9/7/2018 1.32%17305EFE09/7/20184,250,000.00 4,258,287.504,282,871.075% clean up callCHAIT 2006-A2 A2 4/16/2018 5.16%161571BC74/16/20182,426,000.00 2,438,003.852,514,700.6310% clean up callCHAIT 2014-A1 A1 1/15/2019 1.15%161571GJ71/15/201913,000,000.00 12,989,951.0013,057,890.6910% clean up callCHEVRON CORP3/2/2018 0.432967%166764AW03/2/2018 4,000,000.00 3,971,392.004,000,000.00Float quarterly: LIBOR +17 bps CISCO SYSTEMS INC 06/15/2018 17275RAY8 6/15/2018 5,500,000.00 5,488,455.505,500,000.00Float quarterly: LIBOR +31 bpsCITIGROUP INC 3/10/2017 0.7744%172967HL83/10/2017 1,000,000.00 997,589.00999,690.00Float quarterly: LIBOR +54 bpsCITIGROUP INC 4/27/2018 0.967%172967JQ54/27/2018 5,000,000.00 4,979,775.005,000,000.00Float quarterly: LIBOR +69 bpsCITIGROUP INC. 12/07/18172967KF712/7/2018 3,000,000.00 2,990,559.003,000,000.00Float quarterly: LIBOR +86 bpsCOMCAST CORP 6/15/2016 4.95%20030NAG66/15/20161,402,000.00 1,427,282.271,501,163.46Make‐whole call +20 bps until 5/15/15CREDIT SUISSE NEW YORK 4/27/2018 0.9574 22546QAW74/27/2018 5,500,000.00            5,473,919.005,500,000.00Float quarterly: LIBOR +68 bpsFANNIE MAE 02/27/2017 0.65%3135G0XL22/27/20173,660,000.00 3,645,239.223,654,876.00Quarterly; First 11/27/13; Last 11/27/16FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP 09/15/18 31394JTT4 9/15/2018 2,497,065.03 2,594,175.892,597,727.961% clean up callFEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOC 05/16/17 3135G0ZD85/16/2017 2,000,000.00 2,007,716.002,019,420.00One time: 5/16/16FITAT 2015-1 A2A MTGE 1.02% 05/15/1831680GAB25/15/2018 10,400,000.00 10,374,988.0010,399,716.0810% collateral callFREDDIE MAC 4/14/2017 0.8%3134G6PN74/14/2017 10,000,000.00          10,000,800.0010,012,500.00One time: 4/14/16FREDDIE MAC 0.85% 05/26/20173134G6E825/26/201711,545,000.00 11,518,354.1411,543,845.50Quarterly; First 8/26/15; Last 2/26/17FREDDIE MAC0.75% 05/26/20173134G6R705/26/20175,000,000.00 4,976,470.004,995,500.00One time: 5/26/16FREDDIE MAC 0.85% 06/16/20173134G6W666/16/20175,000,000.00 4,983,375.005,000,000.00One time: 6/16/16FIFTH THIRD BANK 2/26/2016 0.9% 31677QAX7 2/26/20166,810,000.00 6,809,986.386,821,310.80Call anytime after 1/26/16FIFTH THIRD BANK 11/18/2016 0.7481% 31677QAZ2 11/18/20168,360,000.00 8,358,796.168,371,221.50Float quarterly: LIBOR +51 bps; Call after 10/18/16GE DEALER FLOORPLANMASTER NT 04/20/18 36159LCF1 4/20/20184,690,000.00 4,690,023.454,690,000.00Float monthly: LIBOR +40 bps; 10% clean up callGENERAL ELEC CAPCORP 05/11/2016 36962G2V5 5/11/20164,635,000.00 4,635,018.544,583,207.70Float quarterly: LIBOR +20 bpsGEORGIA POWER COMPANY 4/15/2016 3% 373334JV44/15/20164,395,000.00 4,419,392.254,500,919.50Make‐whole call +15 bps until 4/15/16HARLEY-DAVIDSON 0.8% 01/15/1941284CAB01/15/20194,539,618.31 4,524,964.424,539,585.1610% collateral callHAROT 2015-1 A2 7/17/2017 0.7%43814KAB76/15/2017 4,104,083.92 4,100,082.444,106,062.1010% collateral callHAROT 2014-1 A3 11/21/2017 0.67%43813JAC911/21/2017 3,969,346.52 3,962,209.633,967,175.8010% collateral callHAWAII-TXBL-REF-ES 8/1/2016 0.731%4197915E48/1/201614,250,000.00 14,256,555.0014,251,690.00Make‐whole call +10 bpsHDMOT 2013‐1 A3 7/16/2018 0.65% 41283YAC1 7/16/2018549,796.54 549,277.54549,066.3310% collateral callHDMOT 2015-1 A2A 1/15/2019 0.95%41284BAB21/15/2019 8,240,631.66 8,227,009.908,240,564.9310% collateral up callHONDA AUTO RECEIV-ABLES 08/21/2017 43813NAB2 8/21/2017 2,000,000.00 1,997,156.001,999,880.2010% clean up callHONDA AUTO RECEIV-ABLES 07/23/1843814LAB57/23/2018 2,100,000.00 2,094,357.302,099,961.7810% collateral callHSBC USA INC 11/13/2017 0.57185% 40428HPM811/13/20177,955,000.00 7,889,411.037,953,996.43Float quarterly: LIBOR +34 bpsHSBC USA INC 8/7/2018 1.0809% 40428HPW6 8/7/2018 2,000,000.00 1,998,464.002,000,000.00Float quarterly: LIBOR +77 bpsIBM CORP 7/22/2016 1.95%459200GX37/22/201612,450,000.00 12,524,463.4512,714,064.50Make‐whole call +15 bps until 7/22/16INDUSTRY PUB FACS-A 1/1/2017 1.764%45656TAQ11/1/20177,700,000.00 7,741,657.007,700,000.00Make‐whole call +25 bps JDOT 2015-A A2A 2/15/2018 0.87% 47787UAB9 2/15/2018 6,628,442.57 6,619,706.286,628,015.7010% clean up callJDOT 2015-B A20 6/15/2018 0.98%47787WAB56/15/2018 4,500,000.00 4,489,632.004,499,848.3510% clean up callJOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORP 1/16/2018 0.543 24422ESU4 1/16/2018 12,165,000.00 12,119,916.5112,181,594.50Float quarterly: LIBOR +29 bpsJP MORGAN CHASE BANKNA  6/13/2016 0.6101 48121CJM9 6/13/2016 6,650,000.00            6,640,118.106,576,340.50Float quarterly: LIBOR +33 bpsJPMORGAN CHASE & CO 2/15/2017 0.750933% 46623EJZ32/15/2017 1,500,000.00            1,499,019.001,503,180.00Float quarterly: LIBOR +52 bpsCONTRA COSTA COUNTYCALTRUST SHORT TERM FUNDSTRUCTURED SECURITIESDecember 31, 2015March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes651 Exhibit VI (a)DESCRIPTIONCUSIPMATURITY DATEPARMARKETCOSTPROVISIONS($)($)($)CONTRA COSTA COUNTYCALTRUST SHORT TERM FUNDSTRUCTURED SECURITIESDecember 31, 2015KEY BANK NA 11/25/2016 0.7516%49327M2E311/25/2016 8,000,000.00            8,000,096.008,023,008.00Float quarterly: LIBOR +49 bps; Call anytime on or after 10/25/16LOS ANGELES CALIF MUN IMPT CORP 11/01/16 544587B7211/1/2016 10,965,000.00 10,983,750.1510,965,000.00Make‐whole callMANUF & TRADERS TRUST CO 7/25/2017 0.53 55279HAH3 7/25/2017 5,000,000.00 4,984,385.005,000,000.00Float quarterly: LIBOR +30 bps MBALT 2015-A A2A 2/15/2017 0.78% 58768LAB9 2/15/2017 2,325,918.83 2,325,193.142,325,787.4210% clean up callMBALT 2015-B A2A 1% 01/16/18 58769AAB2 1/16/2018 10,000,000.00 9,975,840.009,999,108.005% clean up callMBART 2014-1 A2 2/15/2017 0.43%587729AB02/15/2017 258,728.97 258,618.24258,713.7810% clean up callMERCEDES BENZ AUTO RECEIVABLES 06/15/18 58772PAB4 6/15/2018 2,050,000.00 2,045,297.302,047,117.195% collateral callMISSISSIPPI ST-B-TXBL 10/1/2016 0.64% 605581FW2 10/1/2016 2,780,000.00 2,777,970.602,780,000.00Make‐whole call +20 bps MISSISSIPPI ST-D-REF10/1/2016 0.64% 605581EP8 10/1/2016 2,520,000.00 2,518,513.202,520,000.00Make‐whole call +25 bpsMORGAN STANLEY 1/5/2018 1.007098%61761JVN61/5/20187,938,000.00 7,931,482.907,946,613.24Float quarterly: LIBOR +74 bpsNALT 2014-B A2A 4/17/2017 0.73%65490BAB14/17/2017 5,152,745.41 5,145,480.035,152,341.9410% clean up callNAROT 2014-B A2 6/15/2017 0.6%65477WAB26/15/2017 2,048,536.75 2,047,127.352,048,426.745% collateral callNAROT 2015-A A2 9/15/2017 0.67%65477UAB69/15/2017 4,678,962.20 4,673,993.154,678,726.385% collateral callNEW YORK ST DORM AUT 2/15/17 .93%64990EJ322/15/2017 3,685,000.00 3,684,926.303,685,221.10Make‐whole call +20 bps NEW YORK ST URBAN DEV 3/15/2016 0.63% 650035K563/15/2016 10,000,000.00 10,001,700.0010,000,000.00Make‐whole call +25 bpsNY DORM AUTH-D-TXBL 3/15/2016 0.66%64990ERF63/15/2016 2,500,000.00 2,500,800.002,505,325.00Make‐whole call +15 bpsPNC BANK NA 06/01/201869353REN46/1/2018 3,000,000.00 2,985,711.003,000,000.00Float quarterly: LIBOR +42 bpsPNC BANK NA 1/27/2017 1.125%69353RCG11/27/2017 12,735,000.00 12,692,006.6412,757,197.90Call anytime on and after 10/1/15TAOT 2014‐B A2 12/15/2016 0.4% 89231RAB0 12/15/201689,939.8589,915.8489,932.065% collateral callTAOT 2013-A A3 1/17/2017 0.55% 89236RAC3 1/17/2017 459,727.83 459,534.28460,015.165% collateral callTAOT 2014-A A31 2/15/2017 0.67%89231MAC912/15/2017 1,076,199.23 1,073,926.291,073,971.165% collateral callTAOT 2015-A A2 7/17/2017 0.71%89236WAB47/17/2017 5,537,052.62 5,532,384.885,537,000.015% collateral callTAOT 2015-C A2A 2/15/2018 0.93%89231TAB62/15/2018 5,550,000.00 5,541,569.555,549,553.785% collateral callTHE COCA-COLA COMPANY 10/27/17191216BR010/27/2017 1,500,000.00 1,494,411.001,499,340.00Make‐whole call +5 bpsTOYOTA MOTOR CREDITCORP 9/15/2016 2% 89233P5E29/15/2016 895,000.00 902,223.55911,512.75Make‐whole call +20 bps UNIV OF CALIFORNIA‐AN  5/15/2016 0.634% 91412GUT0 5/15/2016 1,830,000.00            1,830,677.101,830,000.00Make‐whole call +5 bpsUNION BANK NA 9/26/2016 0.9996% 90521APG7 9/26/20162,515,000.00 2,514,967.312,517,311.05Float quarterly: LIBOR +75 bps TOYOTA MOTOR CREDITCORP 1/12/2018 0.57 89236TCB91/12/2018 13,000,000.00 12,926,810.0013,000,000.00Float quarterly: LIBOR +32 bps UNIVERSITY CALIF REVS 07/01/2041191412GEZ47/1/2017 10,880,000.00 10,876,736.0010,880,000.00Float monthly: LIBOR +58 bpsUNION BANK NA9/26/2016 1.5%90521APH5 9/26/2016 4,575,000.00 4,586,190.454,603,999.75Call anytime on and after 8/26/16US BANCORP 11/15/2016 2.2%91159HHB9 11/15/2016 1,365,000.00 1,378,157.241,383,045.30Call anytime on and after 10/14/16US BANK NA CINCINNATI 1/26/2018 0.55572 90331HMR1 1/26/2018 4,500,000.00 4,478,053.504,503,960.00Float quarterly: LIBOR +30 bps US BANK NA CINCINNATI 1/30/2017 0.4661% 90331HMD2 1/30/2017 4,500,000.00 4,997,750.004,503,960.00Float quarterly: LIBOR +23 bpsUSAOT 2014-1 A31 2/15/2017 0.58% 90290KAC9 12/15/2017 1,466,097.06 1,463,735.181,465,524.3710% collateral callUSAOT 2015-1 A23/15/2018 0.82%90290XAB33/15/2018 11,430,000.00 11,412,386.3711,429,574.8010% collateral callVALET 2013-2 A3 4/20/2018 0.7% 92867PAC7 4/20/2018 4,071,030.42 4,051,591.254,058,467.4710% collateral callVERIZON COMMUNICATIONS  9/15/2016 1.7823 92343VBL7 9/15/2016 1,925,000.00            1,936,786.781,925,000.00Float quarterly: LIBOR +153 bpsVERIZON COMMUNICATIONS 9/15/2016 2.5% 92343VBN3 9/15/2016 6,500,000.00 6,550,719.506,553,170.00Make‐whole call +30 bpsVERIZON COMMUNICATIONS  6/9/2017 0.6306% 92343VCD46/9/2017 1,000,000.00            995,787.001,000,000.00Float quarterly: LIBOR +40 bps VWALT 2014-A A3 4/20/2017 0.8%92867QAD34/20/20177,023,042.46 7,003,644.827,027,568.2510% clean up callVWALT 2015-A A2A 6/20/2017 0.87% 92867VAB6 6/20/2017 1,477,980.33 1,475,135.221,477,973.1010% clean up callTOTAL470,666,788.85 471,003,238.50 471,638,444.00 Notes:1. The security has a mandatory put date of 7/1/2017.Contra Costa County invests approximately $148.5 million in the CalTRUST Short Term Fund which had assets of $1,018.4 million as of 12/31/15. The above data represents the information at the Short Term Fund level, not at the Contra Costa County account level.March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes652 Exhibit VI (b) DESCRIPTION CUSIP MATURITY DATE PAR MARKET COST PROVISIONS AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE 02665WAY7 9/20/2017 $500,000.00 $499,442.00 $500,000.00 Float quarterly: LIBOR +45 bps ANAHEIM FING AUTH-B 03255LGX1 5/1/2016 $750,000.00 $751,460.00 $750,000.00 Make-whole call BANK OF AMERICA NA 06050TLU4 2/14/2017 $500,000.00 $499,731.80 $500,000.00 Float quarterly: LIBOR +47 bps BANK OF AMERICA NA 06050TMB5 6/5/2017 $250,000.00 $249,321.10 $250,000.00 Float quarterly: LIBOR +45 bps BB&T CORPORATION 05531FAG8 2/16/2016 $750,000.00 $759,117.92 $766,320.00 Call anytime on or after 2/16/16 BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY FIN 084664CD1 1/12/2018 $750,000.00 $749,322.08 $750,000.00 Float quarterly: LIBOR +30 bps CISCO SYSTEMS INC 17275RAY8 6/15/2018 $750,000.00 $748,716.88 $750,000.00 Float quarterly: LIBOR +31 bps COCA-COLA CO 191216BR0 10/27/2017 $300,000.00 $299,348.87 $299,868.00 Make-whole call +5 bps FITAT 2014-2 A2A 31679KAB6 4/17/2017 $86,721.92 $86,700.73 $86,712.39 10% collateral call FITAT-151-A2A 31680GAB2 5/15/2018 $500,000.00 $499,024.32 $499,986.35 10% collateral call HAROT 2015-1 A2 43814KAB7 6/15/2017 $252,965.61 $252,797.77 $252,952.41 10% collateral call HAWAII-TXBL-REF-ES 4197915E4 8/1/2016 $750,000.00 $752,629.38 $750,000.00 Make-whole call +10 bps HDMOT 2015-1 A2A 41284BAB2 1/15/2019 $319,404.33 $318,989.82 $319,401.74 10% collateral call HOME DEPOT INC 437076BJ0 9/15/2017 $750,000.00 $751,417.13 $751,401.98 Float quarterly: LIBOR +37 bps HTMOT 2014 - A A2 41284AAB4 4/15/2018 $65,802.65 $65,742.73 $65,798.20 10% clean up call JDOT 2015-B A2 47787WAB5 6/15/2018 $400,000.00 $399,252.58 $399,986.52 10% clean up call LOS ANGELES CALIF MUN IMPT CORP LEASE REV544587B72 11/1/2016 $490,000.00 $491,558.20 $490,000.00 Make-whole call MBART-151-A2A 58772PAB4 6/15/2018 $650,000.00 $648,745.53 $649,085.94 5% collateral call MISSISSIPPI ST-B-TXBL 605581FW2 10/1/2016 $300,000.00 $300,261.00 $300,000.00 Make-whole call +20 bps PNC BANK NA 69349LAH1 1/28/2016 $750,000.00 $752,537.25 $751,785.00 Call anytime on or after 12/28/15 NAROT 2014-B A2 65477WAB2 6/15/2017 $396,490.98 $396,323.85 $396,469.70 5% collateral call TAOT 2015-A A2 89236WAB4 7/17/2017 $495,855.46 $495,594.07 $495,850.75 5% collateral call UNIV OF CALIFORNIA REVENUES 91412GUT0 5/15/2016 $250,000.00 $250,295.03 $250,000.00 Make-whole call +5 bps USAOT 2015-1 A2 90290XAB3 3/15/2018 $480,000.00 $479,435.45 $479,982.14 10% collateral call US BANK NA CINCINNATI 90331HMR1 1/26/2018 $300,000.00 $298,883.01 $300,000.00 Float quarterly: LIBOR +30 bps US BANK NA CINCINNATI 90331HMR1 1/26/2018 $450,000.00 $448,324.52 $451,206.00 10% clean up call VOLKSWAGEN GROUP AMERICA 928668AD4 5/23/2016 $500,000.00 $496,780.20 $500,000.00 Float quarterly: LIBOR +22 bps Total $12,737,240.96 $12,741,753.19 $12,756,807.11 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY WELLS CAP MANAGEMENT STRUCTURED SECURITIES December 31, 2015 March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 653 Pooled Money Investment AccountPAR VALUES MATURING BY DATE AND TYPEMaturities in Millions of Dollars1 day 31 days 61 days 91 days 121 days 151 days 181 days 211 days 271 days 1 year 2 years 3 years 4 yearsto to to to to to to to to to to to toITEM 30 days 60 days 90 days 120 days 150 days 180 days 210 days 270 days 1 year 2 years 3 years 4 years 5 year/outTREASURY750$ 4,200$1,050$ 1,700$ 1,300$ 3,200$ 3,750$ 3,000$ 4,400$ 8,900$500$REPOTDs2,044$ 1,448$1,410$ 296$ 297$ 183$ AGENCY1,592$ 1,280$1,350$ 1,725$ 900$ 1,400$ 430$ 500$ 75$ 627$781$CP150$ 640$500$ 600$ 300$ 200$ CDs + BNs4,150$ 1,385$ 2,100$ 2,100$ 100$ 800$ 650$ 300$ CORP BNDTOTAL63,063$8,686$ 8,953$6,410$ 6,421$ 2,897$ 5,783$ 4,830$ 3,500$ 4,775$ 9,527$1,281$-$ -$ PERCENT 13.8% 14.2% 10.2% 10.2% 4.6% 9.2% 7.7% 5.6% 7.6% 15.1% 2.0% 0.0% 0.0%Notes: 1. SBA Floating Rate Securities are represented at coupon change date.2. Mortgages are represented at current book value.3. Figures are rounded to the nearest million.4. Does not include AB55 and General Fund loans.Portfolio as of 12-31-15Exhibit VIIState of CaliforniaMarch 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes654 State of California Pooled Money Investment Account Market Valuation 12/31/2015 Description Carrying Cost Plus Accrued Interest Purch.Amortized Cost Fair Value Accrued Interest United States Treasury: Bills 10,468,708,753.45$ 10,482,830,783.28$ 10,478,607,000.00$ NA Notes 22,248,452,535.53$ 22,247,129,027.71$ 22,207,793,500.00$ 24,762,324.50$ Federal Agency: SBA 642,351,164.21$ 642,343,909.17$ 635,322,467.80$ 549,995.41$ MBS-REMICs 73,596,655.56$ 73,596,655.56$ 77,904,572.74$ 348,792.53$ Debentures 961,990,090.06$ 961,986,867.84$ 961,041,000.00$ 3,893,258.30$ Debentures FR -$ -$ -$ -$ Discount Notes 7,584,478,430.49$ 7,593,829,138.89$ 7,592,138,500.00$ NA GNMA -$ -$ -$ -$ Supranational Debentures 350,151,164.92$ 350,151,164.92$ 349,959,000.00$ 626,387.50$ CDs and YCDs FR 200,000,000.00$ 200,000,000.00$ 200,000,000.00$ 197,363.48$ Bank Notes 400,000,000.00$ 400,000,000.00$ 399,813,054.46$ 351,250.00$ CDs and YCDs 10,985,007,118.52$ 10,985,007,118.52$ 10,981,602,163.42$ 9,862,947.22$ Commercial Paper 2,385,328,869.46$ 2,386,701,088.85$ 2,386,066,166.67$ NA Corporate: Bonds FR -$ -$ -$ -$ Bonds -$ -$ -$ -$ Repurchase Agreements -$ -$ -$ -$ Reverse Repurchase -$ -$ -$ -$ Time Deposits 5,677,040,000.00$ 5,677,040,000.00$ 5,677,040,000.00$ NA AB 55 & GF Loans 3,590,865,000.00$ 3,590,865,000.00$ 3,590,865,000.00$ NA TOTAL 65,567,969,782.20$ 65,591,480,754.74$ 65,538,152,425.09$ 40,592,318.94$ Fair Value Including Accrued Interest $ 65,578,744,744.03 Repurchase Agreements, Time Deposits, AB 55 & General Fund loans, and Reverse Repurchase agreements are carried at portfolio book value (carrying cost). The value of each participating dollar equals the fair value divided by the amortized cost (0.999186963). As an example: if an agency has an account balance of $20,000,000.00, then the agency would report its participation in the LAIF valued at $19,983,739.25 or $20,000,000.00 x 0.999186963. Exhibit VII (a) State of California All investments are in U.S. Dollar according to the State of California March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 655 Pooled Money Investment Account DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Portfolio Holdings: Structured Notes and Asset-Backed Securities The Treasury Investment Division has received a number of inquiries concerning our various portfolio holdings. Questions involving structured notes, derivative products*, and asset- backed securities are the most notable. In an effort to clarify the information provided in our monthly statements, we would like to share with you our investment positions in structured notes and asset-backed securities. Following are the State of California Treasurer’s holdings in each category as of December 31, 2015: * The Pooled Money Investment Account Portfolio has not invested in, nor will it invest in, Derivative Products as defined in FASB 133. Exhibit VII (b) State of California March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 656 1. Structured Notes Structured notes are debt securities (other than asset-backed securities) whose cash flow characteristics (coupon rate, redemption amount, or stated maturity) depend upon one or more indices and/or that have embedded forwards or options. They are issued by corporations and by government-sponsored enterprises such as the Federal National Mortgage Association and the Federal Home Loan Bank System or an international agency such as the World Bank. Securities Accountability Structured Notes a. Callable Agency $ 0.000 million b. LIBOR Agency Floater $ 0.000 million c. 3 month LIBOR Corporate Floater $ 0.000 million d. 3 month LIBOR Bank Floater $ 200.000 million e. 2 year CMT Corporate Floater $ 0.000 million f. 3 month T-Bill Agency Floater $ 0.000 million g. 3 month T-Bill Corporate Floater $ 0.000 million U.S. $200.000 million As of: 12/31/15 2. Asset-Backed Securities Asset-backed securities entitle the purchaser to receive a share of the cash flows from a pool of assets such as principal and interest repayments from a pool of mortgages (such as CMOs), small business loans, or credit card receivables (such as ABCP). Asset-Backed Securities a. Small Business Administration Pools $ 642.343 million b. Agency MBS-REMIC’S $ 73.597 million (Medium term sub-total) $ 715.940 million c. Commercial Paper (Short term sub-total) $ 239.501 million U.S. $955.441 million As of: 12/31/15 Exhibit VII (b) State of California March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 657 Total Portfolio As of: 12/31/15 $65,567,969,782.20 Structured notes and Medium-term Asset-backed securities as a percent of portfolio: 1.40% Short-term Asset-Backed Commercial Paper (ABCP) as a percent of portfolio: 0.36% * Total Medium-term and Short-term Structured notes and Asset-backed securities as a percent of portfolio: 1.76% *ABCP purchased by the Pooled Money Investment Account (PMIA) does not include Structured Investment Vehicles (SIVs) nor do any of the approved ABCP programs include SIVs as underlying assets. Exhibit VII (b) State of California March 8, 2016 Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes 658 Exhibit VIIIPar Value2,570,711,453.24     Book Price100.001Book Value2,570,728,827.44     Average Days to Maturity 280Market Value 2,569,513,821.31     Coupon0.7270%Market Price99.953 YTM0.6955%Yield ChangeMarket ValueMarket Price Gain/Loss2(bps)($)($)(bps)‐502,579,297,375.15  100.33438.12‐252,574,392,389.33  100.14319.01‐102,571,462,091.73  100.0297.6002,569,513,821.31  99.9530.00102,567,569,744.47  99.878‐7.50252,564,661,463.26  99.765‐18.81502,559,835,109.36  99.577‐37.62Note: Stress Testing is a form of testing that is used to determine the stability of a given system or entity.  It reveals how well a portfolio is positionedin the event the forecasts prove true. The stress test conducted on the portfolio managed by the Treasurer's Office identifies the sensitivity of our portfolio to the change in interest rate. The test result shows if the yield were to go down by 50 bps, the market value of the portfolio wouldincrease by 38.12 bps. If the yield were to go up by 50 bps, the market value of the portfolio would decrease by 37.62 bps.1. The stress test is conducted on the portfolio managed by the Treasurer's Office. Portfolios managed by outside contractors are excluded. All data is provided by SunGard.2. Gain/Loss is calcuated based on the market value/price.Portfolio Stress Test1as of December 31, 2015March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes659 Exhibit IXSecurity Coupon Purchase Maturity Par MarketDescriptionCUSIPRateYTMDateDateValueValue2Fund4Compton CA Community Redev Agy204712FD0 0.0000% 6.5258% 1/3/201218/1/1610,000.00 7,453.00 5033Palo Alto USD Refunding Bond697379UA1 1.4020% 1.4020% 8/14/12 8/1/17 440,000.00 440,000.00 7903University of Cal Tax Revenue Bond91412GPX7 0.6590% 0.6590% 3/14/13 5/15/16 1,240,000.00 1,240,000.00 6911University of Cal Tax Revenue Bond91412GPY5 0.9660% 0.9660% 3/14/13 5/15/17 175,000.00 175,000.00 7903Chicago Prerefunded Proj & Refunding Bond 167486JB6 5.0000% 1.6188% 6/27/1331/1/17 170,000.00 189,542.34 5057Chicago Unrefunded Bal-Proj & Refunding Bd 167486JC4 5.0000% 2.5923% 6/27/1331/1/17 390,000.00 421,318.77 5057Washington State GO Bond 93974B3K6 5.0000% 1.3012% 6/27/1331/1/18 600,000.00 696,925.06 5057South Bend IN Refunding Revenue Bond 836496NW5 5.0000% 1.6170% 6/27/1331/15/16 505,000.00 547,506.38 5057Wicomico County MD GO Bond 967545R89 3.5000% 1.6386% 6/27/13312/1/18 390,000.00 427,550.12 5057Univ of Cal Taxable Rev Bond 91412GSX4 0.9070% 0.9070% 10/2/13 5/15/16 415,000.00 415,000.00 6911Univ of Cal Taxable Rev Bond 91412GSZ9 2.0540% 2.0540% 10/2/13 5/15/18 195,000.00 195,000.00 7903Cal State Taxable GO Bond 13063CFD7 1.2500% 1.0901% 11/5/13 11/1/16 125,000.00 125,586.25 7903Cal State Taxable GO Bond 13063CFD7 1.2500% 1.0901% 11/5/13 11/1/16 790,000.00 793,705.10 6911State of Mississippi GO Bond 605581FX0 1.0900% 1.0900% 2/18/15 10/1/17 110,000.00 110,000.00 6911Total$5,555,000.00 $5,784,587.021Date when the security was transferred from AUHSD to Contra Costa County Investment Pool managed by Treasurer's Office2Market Value equals Cost less purchase interest3Date when the security was transferred from Fund 5055 to Fund 5057 per AUHSD's request4 Fund #5033 - Acalanes Union High School District5057 - Acalanes Union High School District6911 - Contra Costa County Schools Insurance Group7903 - Contra Costa Community College District Retiree Health BenefitsCONTRA COSTA COUNTYTREASURER'S INVESTMENT PORTFOLIOMUNICIPAL SECURITIESDecember 31, 2015March 8, 2016Contra Costa County BOS Official Minutes660