Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 06132017 -CALENDAR FOR THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CONTRA COSTA COUNTY AND FOR SPECIAL DISTRICTS, AGENCIES, AND AUTHORITIES GOVERNED BY THE BOARD BOARD CHAMBERS ROOM 107, ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, 651 PINE STREET MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA 94553-1229 FEDERAL D. GLOVER, CHAIR, 5TH DISTRICT KAREN MITCHOFF, VICE CHAIR, 4TH DISTRICT JOHN GIOIA, 1ST DISTRICT CANDACE ANDERSEN, 2ND DISTRICT DIANE BURGIS, 3RD DISTRICT DAVID J. TWA, CLERK OF THE BOARD AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR, (925) 335-1900 PERSONS WHO WISH TO ADDRESS THE BOARD DURING PUBLIC COMMENT OR WITH RESPECT TO AN ITEM THAT IS ON THE AGENDA, MAY BE LIMITED TO TWO (2) MINUTES. A LUNCH BREAK MAY BE CALLED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE BOARD CHAIR. The Board of Supervisors respects your time, and every attempt is made to accurately estimate when an item may be heard by the Board. All times specified for items on the Board of Supervisors agenda are approximate. Items may be heard later than indicated depending on the business of the day. Your patience is appreciated. ANNOTATED AGENDA & MINUTES June 13, 2017                 9:00 A.M. Convene, call to order and opening ceremonies. Inspirational Thought- "Everything that irritates us about others can lead us to an understanding of ourselves." ~ Carl Jung Present: District I Supervisor John Gioia; District II Supervisor Candace Andersen; District III Supervisor Diane Burgis; District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff; District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Staff Present:David Twa, County Administrator Sharon Anderson, County Counsel CONSIDER CONSENT ITEMS (Items listed as C.1 through C.86 on the following agenda) – Items are subject to removal from Consent Calendar by request of any Supervisor or on request for discussion by a member of the public. Items removed from the Consent Calendar will be considered with the Discussion Items.   DISCUSSION ITEMS   D. 1 INTERVIEW five finalists for the Board of Supervisors Appointee #5, #9, and the Alternate to BOS Appointees #4, #5, #6 and #9 seats on the Contra Costa County Employees' Retirement Association Board of Trustees, and DETERMINE what action the Board wishes to take regarding the appointments. (David Twa, County Administrator)       INTERVIEWED four finalists (Debora Allen withdrew her application); APPOINTED Jerry Holcombe as Appointee #5, John Phillips as Appointee #9 and Jay Kwon as Alternate to Appointees #4, #5, #6 and #9.    AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1 D. 2 HEARING to consider adoption of Ordinance No. 2017-10 regulating the location of tobacco retailing businesses; and CONSIDER introducing Ordinance No. 2017-01 regulating tobacco products and retail sales, waiving reading, and fix June 20, 2017 for adoption of Ordinance No. 2017-01, as recommended by the Family and Human Services Committee. (Dan Peddycord, Public Health Director; Denice Dennis, Tobacco Prevention Manager)       Speakers: Phillip Gardiner, African American Tobacco Central Leadership Council; Mark Block, Electronic Vaping Coalition of America; Mark Keiman, Botech Analysis; Melvin Willis, resident of Richmond; Jaime Rojas, NATO (handout); Mike Easter, resident of Fairfield; Jas Singh, Greater Bay Franchisee Owners Association; Stefan Didak, Not Blowing Smoke; Sallie Goetsch, resident of Oakley; Dee Kalza, resident of Richmond; Rich Marianos, Law Enforcement, Gainesville Virginia; Paul Sekhon; Jade Greene, resident of Antioch; David Alga; Kayle Loftis; Manjit Puraeante, 7-Eleven Franchise Owners Association; James Jack, Cigar Association of America; Nilesh Patel, resident of Concord; Sheena Grewall, 7-Eleven; Jaspal Dadhwal, resident of Vacaville; Shashi Paul, resident of Vacaville; Dilaver Singh, Gas City Inc.; Aasin Ali, Fast & Easy APLA; Ryan Durkin, Core-Mark; Nancy Ybarra, resident of Richmond; Bob Gordon, Tobacco Prevention Coalition; Laura Nathan, resident of Lafayette; Cynthia LeBlanc, resident of Richmond; Margo Connolly, American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network; SanJin Patel, APCA; Liz Williams, Americans for Nonsmokers’ Rights; Mary Jaccodiane, CCC Tobacco Prevention Coalition; Jaime Rich, Center for Human Development; Carol McGruder, African American Tobacco Control Leadership Council; Lori Bremner, American Cancer society Cancer Action Network; Guadalupe Alaniz, Monument Impact; Azucena Virgen, Monument Impact; Azucena Torrez, monument Impact; Blanca Colin, Monument Impact; Ryan Orihood; Lamont Hill, resident of Richmond; Alison Wohlgemuth, resident of Brentwood; Rosalyn Muge, Project Ride; Britni Boden, Project Ride; Nicole Reyes, Project Ride; Karina Avila, Project Ride; Nya Taylor, Contra Costa Youth Health Coalition Courage; Randy Uang, Breathe California-Golden Gate Public Health Partnership; Paul Escobar, Project Ride; Lanier Clarke, BACK; Alishba & Noi Mer; Karina Guadalupe, resident of Richmond; Nancy Sullivan; Nancy Newhart, resident of Walnut Creek; Genevieve Smith, MDUUC; Paul Cummings, Tobacco Control Coalition; Ratib Norzei, resident of Fremont. Comments submitted in writing attached. The Board discussed and voted upon the new provisions proposed for the tobacco product control ordinance and zoning ordinance. a. Require a Tobacco Retailer License for all retailers selling traditional and/or emerging tobacco products : AYES: Gioia, Andersen, Burgis, Mitchoff, Glover b. Prohibit the sale of flavored (non-cigarette) tobacco products (smokeless, little cigars, hookah tobacco and dissolvable tobacco products, vape pens, vapor solutions, e-cigarettes) within all of the unincorporated area AYES: Gioia, Glover NOES: Andersen, Burgis, Mitchoff c. Prohibit the sale of menthol flavored cigarettes within all the unincorporated area AYES: Gioia, Andersen, Burgis, Mitchoff, Glover d. Require minimum pack size of 10 for cigars, excluding premium cigars that cost $5 or more AYES: Gioia, Andersen, Burgis, Mitchoff, Glover e. Prohibit sale of tobacco products in pharmacies in the unincorporated area AYES: Gioia, Andersen, Burgis, Glover NOES: Mitchoff f. Require tobacco retailers to comply with storefront signage laws AYES: Gioia, Andersen, Burgis, Mitchoff, Glover g. Require tobacco retailers to comply with drug paraphernalia sales laws AYES: Gioia, Andersen, Burgis, Mitchoff, Glover h. Require tobacco retailers to check ID of customer who appear younger than 27 AYES: Gioia, Andersen, Burgis, Mitchoff, Glover June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 2 i. Limit or “cap” the number of retailers that can sell tobacco products AYES: Gioia, Andersen, Burgis, Mitchoff, Glover j. Remove tobacco advertising during license suspension AYES: Gioia, Andersen, Burgis, Mitchoff, Glover k. Expand time period reviewed for prior violations of license from 2 years to 5 years AYES: Gioia, Andersen, Burgis, Mitchoff, Glover l. 1. Prohibit locations of a new tobacco retailer within 1000 feet of schools, parks, playgrounds and libraries AYES: Gioia, Andersen, Burgis, Glover NOES: Mitchoff 2.Remove clause pertaining to declaring a non-conforming use for businesses AYES: Gioia, Andersen, Burgis, Mitchoff, Glover m. Prohibit new tobacco retailers from locating within 500 feet other tobacco retailers AYES: Gioia, Andersen, Burgis, Mitchoff, Glover n. Prohibit new “Significant Tobacco Retailers” (one who primarily sells tobacco products) AYES: Gioia, Andersen, Burgis, Glover NOES: Mitchoff The Supervisors expressed some concerns about the consistencies of prohibitions to be enacted at 500 feet, 1000 feet or unincorporated-area wide. Staff will provide the Board with map data of what these distances portray for clarity. Staff will contact by letter, pharmacies and the retailers that contain pharmacy space in their businesses, in the unincorporated area to notify them of the proposed ban on pharmacies selling tobacco products. The Board Closed the hearing. Staff will return to the Board on July 11, 2017 with the additional information and amended language for the ordinances.   D. 3 CONSIDER Consent Items previously removed.    Consent item C.45 was removed to allow for public commentary and subsequently adopted as presented.   D. 4 Acting as the Governing Board to the Successor Agency of the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency (Successor Agency), CONSIDER adopting Resolution No. 2017/215 to approve the form of the preliminary official statement for the Successor Agency Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds, Series 2017A and 2017B, and take additional related actions, as recommended by the Conservation and Development Director. (100% tax allocation revenue) (Kristen Lackey, Conservation and Development Department)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover D. 5 HEARING to levy assessments in Countywide Landscaping District AD 1979-3 (LL-2) Fiscal Year 2017-18, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Countywide. (100% Countywide Landscaping District AD 1979-3 (LL-2) Funds) (Warren Lai, Public Works Department)       CLOSED the public hearing. ACCEPTED the Fiscal Year 2017-18 Final Engineer's Report for Countywide Landscaping District AD 1979-3 (LL-2), ADOPTED Resolution No. 2017/203 confirming the diagram, assessment roll and assessments set forth in the Fiscal Year 2017-18 Final Engineer's Report; and DIRECTED the Auditor-Controller to place the levy of annual assessments on the tax roll for Fiscal Year 2017-18.    AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover D. 6 CONSIDER approving and authorizing the extension of temporary employment of retirees Dr.   June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 3 D. 6 CONSIDER approving and authorizing the extension of temporary employment of retirees Dr. Anne Harvey, MD, Dr. Gwen Hamilton, MD, Dr. Domenic Cavallaro, DDS, and Wendy Mailer through June 30, 2018; and FIND that the appointments of these retirees are necessary to fill critically needed positions in the Health Services Department. (William Walker, MD, Health Services Director)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover NO: District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff D. 7 ACCEPT the Mental Health Services Act Three Year Program and Expenditure Plan for fiscal years 2017 through 2020, as approved by the Mental Health Commission and recommended by the Behavioral Health Services Director. (William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director)       Speakers: Douglas Dunn, Laura Rettagliata,    AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover D. 8 PUBLIC COMMENT (2 Minutes/Speaker)    The following spoke in opposition to the jail expansion project in Wes County: Luci Riley, California Nurses Association; Carole Johnson, CCC Racial Justice Coalition; Dan Dorsett, resident of Martinez; Lauren Rettagliata, resident of Danville; Melvin Willis, resident of Richmond; Susan Hybloom, resident of Richmond; Joseph Johnson, L.S.P.C.; Jerry Elster, Rubicon; Mimi Elias; Suzanne Llewellyn, resident of Walnut Creek; Rev. Leslie Takahashi, Mt. Diablo Unitarian Universalist Church; Marianne Callahan, resident of Concord; Karen Perkins, Coalition for Racial Justice and Equality; Michael E. Derr, resident of Bay Point; Kathleen Sullivan, resident of Kensington; Amy Kurzes, resident of Kensington; Blanca Retano; Wendy Hershey, CCC Racial Justice Coalition; Nancy Ybarra, resident of Richmond; Edith Pastrano, resident of Richmond; Ana Gonzalez; David Sharples; Calendaria Martinez; Kook Huber, resident of Richmond; Pam Ramirez, resident of Richmond. The following people provided written commentary (attached): Jason Schwarz; Ruth Korano; Bill Schneider, resident of Pleasant Hill; Francisco Torres, resident of Pittsburg; Nancy Newhart, resident of Walnut Creek; Genevieve Smith, Mt. Diablo Unitarian Universalist Church; Pat Reyes, resident of San Ramon; Elliot Baenhaut, resident of Walnut Creek; Sara Spence, resident of Walnut Creek; Sheli Cryderman; Daniel Zwickel, Mt. Diablo Unitarian Universalist Church; Rita Barouch; Ratib Norzei, resident of Fremont; Lyan Pernala, resident of San Pablo; Kathy Beek, resident of Richmond; Roxann Zarchin, resident of El Sobrante; Jennifer Huber, resident of El Sobrante; Anonymous (3).   D. 9 CONSIDER reports of Board members.    There were no items reported today.   Closed Session A. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS 1. Agency Negotiators: David Twa and Bruce Heid. Employee Organizations: Contra Costa County Employees’ Assn., Local No. 1; Am. Fed., State, County, &June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 4 Employee Organizations: Contra Costa County Employees’ Assn., Local No. 1; Am. Fed., State, County, & Mun. Empl., Locals 512 and 2700; Calif. Nurses Assn.; Service Empl. Int’l Union, Local 1021; District Attorney’s Investigators Assn.; Deputy Sheriffs Assn.; United Prof. Firefighters, Local 1230; Physicians’ & Dentists’ Org. of Contra Costa; Western Council of Engineers; United Chief Officers Assn.; Service Employees International Union Local 2015; Contra Costa County Defenders Assn.; Probation Peace Officers Assn. of Contra Costa County; Contra Costa County Deputy District Attorneys’ Assn.; and Prof. & Tech. Engineers, Local 21, AFL-CIO; Teamsters Local 856. 2. Agency Negotiators: David Twa. Unrepresented Employees: All unrepresented employees. B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL--EXISTING LITIGATION (Gov. Code, § 54956.9(d)(1)) Foss Maritime Company v. County of Contra Costa, Contra Costa County Superior Court Case Nos. C14-00133 and C15-00943 1. Architectural Preservation Foundation of Contra Costa County, et al. v. Contra Costa County, et al., Contra Costa County Superior Court Case No. N17-0946 2. Keller Canyon Landfill Company v. County of Contra Costa, et al., Contra Costa County Superior Court Case No. C16-02062 3.    There were no Closed Session announcements.   ADJOURN in memory of Bobbi Griggs El Cerrito High School Counselor   CONSENT ITEMS   Road and Transportation   C. 1 CONTINUE the emergency action taken by the Board of Supervisors originally on March 7, 2017, pursuant to Public Contract Code Sections 22035 and 22050, for the Morgan Territory Road Slide Repair Project, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Clayton area. (100% Local Road Funds); and RECEIVE report on actions taken by Public Works Director.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 2 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent or designee to execute, on behalf of the Public Works Director, a purchase order with Hermann Equipment Inc., in the amount of $315,000, for the purchase of an Etnyer Self-Propelled Chip Spreader for Public Works road maintenance, Countywide. (100% Local Road Funds)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Engineering Services   C. 3 ADOPT Resolution No. 2017/204 accepting completion of improvements for subdivision    June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 5 C. 3 ADOPT Resolution No. 2017/204 accepting completion of improvements for subdivision SD15-09302, for a project developed by Shapell Homes, a Division of Shapell Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, as recommended by the Public Works Director, San Ramon (Dougherty Valley) area. (100% Developer Fees)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 4 ADOPT Resolution No. 2017/206 approving the third extension of the Subdivision Agreement for subdivision SD91-07553, for a project being developed by Alamo Land Investors, LLC and Alamo 37, LLC, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Alamo area. (No fiscal impact)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 5 ADOPT Resolution No. 2017/207 approving the ninth extension of the Drainage Improvement Agreement for DA04-00035, for a project being developed by Shapell Homes, a Division of Shapell Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Danville area. (No fiscal impact)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 6 ADOPT Resolution No. 2017/211 approving the Stormwater Management Facilities Operation and Maintenance Agreement for minor subdivision MS14-0013, for a project being developed by Pacific Union Property Developers, LLC, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Alamo area. (No fiscal impact)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 7 ADOPT Resolution No. 2017/212 approving the Parcel Map and Subdivision Agreement for minor subdivision MS14-0013, for project being developed by Pacific Union Property Developers, LLC, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Alamo area. (No fiscal impact)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Special Districts & County Airports   C. 8 APPROVE the Contra Costa County Green Infrastructure Workplan, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Countywide. (100% Stormwater Utility Assessment 17 Funds)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Claims, Collections & Litigation June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 6 Claims, Collections & Litigation   C. 9 DENY claims filed by Metlife Auto & Home as subrogee of Karla Duron-Ponce, Nationwide Ins. as subrogee of Mohammad Noman, Anthony Secapure, Shabnam Sharifi and Afshin Shahidi.        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 10 AUTHORIZE the discharge from accountability for the account of Cook Paging/American Messaging totaling $663.23, which is not collectable because the debtor agency no longer exists, as recommended by he Department of Information Technology.        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 11 RECEIVE report concerning the final settlement of David Brown vs. Contra Costa County; and AUTHORIZE payment from the Workers' Compensation Internal Service Fund in the amount of $110,000, as recommended by the Director of Risk Management. (100% Workers' Compensation Internal Service Fund)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Statutory Actions   C. 12 APPROVE Board meeting minutes for April and May 2017, as on file with the Office of the Clerk of the Board.        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Appointments & Resignations   C. 13 REAPPOINT Tom Aswad to the District IV-C Seat on the Alcohol and Other Drugs Advisory Board, as recommended by Supervisor Mitchoff.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 14 APPOINT Anthony Rocca to the Alternate 2 Seat on the Alamo Police Services Advisory Committee, as recommended by Supervisor Andersen.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 15 APPOINT Mustafa Alsalihy to the District 1 Seat on the IHSS Public Authority Advisory    June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 7 C. 15 APPOINT Mustafa Alsalihy to the District 1 Seat on the IHSS Public Authority Advisory Committee, as recommended by Supervisor Gioia.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 16 ACCEPT the resignation of Edith Fajardo from the CBO Seat 3 and APPOINT Tamisha Torres-Walker to the CBO Seat 3 on the Racial Justice Task Force; and ACCEPT Cardenas Shackelford as the Antioch Unified School District Representative seat on the Racial Justice Task Force, as recommended by the Director of the Office of Reentry & Justice.        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 17 ACCEPT the resignation of Kaila Vidal, DECLARE vacant the Private / Non-Profit No. 3 on the Economic Opportunity Council, and DIRECT the Clerk of the Board to post the vacancy, as recommended by the Employment and Human Services Director.        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Appropriation Adjustments   C. 18 Employment and Human Services (0503)/Plant Acquisition (0111): APPROVE Appropriation Adjustment No. 5092 in the amount of $388,000 to transfer appropriations from EHSD to the Public Works Department for one capital project, as recommended by the Employment and Human Services Director.        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 19 Employment and Human Services (0503)/Plant Acquisition (0111): APPROVE FY 2016/17 Appropriation Adjustment No.5089 in the amount of $1,038,000 to transfer appropriations from EHSD to the Public Works Department for chiller replacement and roof repairs, as recommended by the Employment and Human Services Director.        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 20 Employment and Human Services (0502): APPROVE Appropriation and Revenue Adjustment No. 5091 to the Federal, State and County expenditure and revenue budgets based on revised caseload projections for Foster Care, KinGAP, Emergency Assistance Foster Care, and Adoptions Assistance programs.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Intergovernmental Relations June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 8 Intergovernmental Relations   C. 21 ADOPT an "Oppose" position on AB 1250 (Sawyer-Jones): Counties and Cities: Personal Services Contracts, as amended on May 30, 2017, a bill that would impose restrictive specific standards for the use of personal services contracts by counties.        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Personnel Actions   C. 22 ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 22098 to add one full-time Licensed Vocational Nurse position (represented) in the Health Services Department. (100% CCHP member fees)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Grants & Contracts   APPROVE and AUTHORIZE execution of agreements between the County and the following agencies for receipt of fund and/or services:   C. 23 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Agricultural Commissioner, or designee, to execute a contract with the California Department of Food and Agriculture to pay County an amount not to exceed $18,564 to provide enforcement through market and production site inspections and investigations for the period July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018. (No County match)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 24 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Sheriff-Coroner, or designee, to execute a contract with the Contra Costa Community College District, including mutual indemnification, to pay the County an amount not to exceed $40,000 to provide police dispatching services for the period June 1, 2017 through May 31, 2022. (100% Contra Costa Community College District)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 25 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the County Librarian, or designee, to apply for and accept a grant in the amount of $5,475 from Fremont Bank Foundation to provide qualified adult learners in Contra Costa County with an accredited online high school degree and career training opportunity, for the period June 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018. (No County match)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 26 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to    June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 9 C. 26 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with California Department of Community Services and Development, effective May 1, 2017, to extend the term through September 30, 2017 with no change to payment limit of $115,014 for home weatherization assistance program services. (No County match)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 27 ADOPT Resolution No. 2017/213 approving and authorizing the District Attorney, or designee, to execute a contract, including any extensions or amendments thereof pursuant to state guidelines, with the California Victim Witness Compensation and Government Claims Board in an amount not to exceed $298,368 to fund a Victim Witness Assistance Program Specialist position for the period July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2019. (100% State)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 28 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Dean and Margaret Lesher Foundation, to pay the County up to $74,000 to promote healthy eating and active living in the Pittsburg community for the County's Pittsburg Food Access Assessment, for the period July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2019. (No County match)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 29 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with the California Department of Education, to pay the County an amount not to exceed $9,081,851 to provide State preschool services, for the period July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018. (No County match)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover APPROVE and AUTHORIZE execution of agreement between the County and the following parties as noted for the purchase of equipment and/or services:   C. 30 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Conservation and Development Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with First Carbon Solutions to increase the payment limit by $70,668 to a new payment limit of $475,092 to complete the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Tassajara Parks Project in the Tassajara Parks / San Ramon area, with no change to the original term ending on September 9, 2018. (100% applicant fees)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 31 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to    June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 10 C. 31 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with STAND! For Families Free of Violence, in an amount not to exceed $182,281 to provide Child Welfare Redesign Differential Response Path 2 Case Management services in East Contra Costa County for the period of July 1, 2017 through June 20, 2018. (100% State)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 32 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Delta Personnel Services, Inc. (dba Guardian Security Agency) in an amount not to exceed $357,110 to provide security guard services for the period July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018. (4% County, 49% State, 47% Federal)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 33 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Anka Behavioral Health, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $581,873 to provide housing assistance services for the County’s Homeless Program, for the period July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018. (100% Federal McKinney-Vento grant)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 34 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent to execute, on behalf of the Sheriff-Coroner, a purchase order amendment with Alcoholic Monitoring Services, to increase the payment limit by $100,000 to a new payment limit of $260,000 for purchase and/or rental of SCRAMx alcohol and house arrest monitoring devices, including monitoring service fees for the devices needed by the Electronic Home Detention Program of the Custody Alternative Facility and to extend the service period to October 31, 2017. (100% General Fund)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 35 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Traditions Psychology Group, Inc. (dba Traditions Behavioral Health), effective June 1, 2017, to increase the payment limit by $650,000 to a new payment limit of $22,200,000, to provide additional physician management and psychiatric staffing services for Contra Costa Regional Medical Center, Health Centers and Main Detention Facility, with no change in the original term of September 1, 2014 through August 31, 2017. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 36 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Kevin A. Beadles, M.D. in an amount not to exceed $1,350,000, to provide ophthalmology services at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center and Health Centers, for the period June 1, 2017 through May 31, 2020. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I)      June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 11  AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 37 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Child Therapy Institute of Marin, in an amount not to exceed $334,750, to provide mental health services for seriously emotionally disturbed children and adolescents in East and West county, for the period July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018, with a six-month automatic extension through December 31, 2018, in an amount not to exceed $167,375. (50% Federal Financial Participation; 50% County Realignment)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 38 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Center for Psychotherapy, in an amount not to exceed $549,328 to provide mental health services to seriously emotionally disturbed adolescents and children, for the period July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018, with a six-month automatic extension through December 31, 2018, in an amount not to exceed $274,664. (50% Federal Financial Participation; 50% Mental Health Realignment)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 39 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a novation contract with Aspiranet, in an amount not to exceed $257,500, to provide Therapeutic Behavioral Services, for the period from July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018, which includes a six-month automatic extension through December 31, 2018, in an amount not to exceed $128,750. (50% Federal Financial Participation; 50% County Realignment)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 40 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Thomas J. McDonald, M.D., in an amount not to exceed $1,722,000, to provide ophthalmology services at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center and Health Centers, for the period from June 1, 2017 through May 31, 2020. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 41 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a novation contract with Desarrollo Familiar, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $376,302, to provide school based mental health services for Latino children and their families, in West Contra Costa County, for the period July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018, with a six-month automatic extension through December 31, 2018, in an amount not to exceed $188,151. (50% Federal Financial Participation; 50% State Early Periodic Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 12 C. 42 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a novation contract with Community Options for Families and Youth, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $2,424,529, to provide therapeutic and behavioral services for the period July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018, with a six-month automatic extension through December 31, 2018 in an amount not to exceed $1,212,264 (43% Federal Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment; 29% County Realignment; 28% Mental Health Services Act).       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 43 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Public Health Foundation Enterprises Inc., in an amount not to exceed $4,991,720, to provide coordinated entry, outreach, shelter, transitional and permanent supportive housing for homeless youth and adults in Contra Costa County, for the period July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018. (33% Federal; 49% State; 12% Local grants; 6% County General Fund)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 44 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Telecare Corporation in an amount not to exceed $1,927,909, to provide gero-psychiatric services and subacute mental health care services to severely and persistently mentally ill clients, for the period July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018. (81% Mental Health Realignment and 19% Hospital Utilization Review)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 45 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with K.B.R., Inc. (dba Rash Curtis & Associates), in an amount not to exceed $1,100,000, to provide debt collection services for unpaid accounts for the Health Services Department through for the period from July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2019. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I)       Speakers: Diana Wilson and Pamela Castillo, employees of Probation Department, for juvenile justice fee collection.     AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 46 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Archer Business Solutions, LLC in an amount not to exceed $281,700, to provide consulting, system planning, project management and implementation support, for the Department’s Information Systems Unit, for the period July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 47 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract    June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 13 C. 47 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with The Center for Common Concerns, Inc. (dba HomeBase), in an amount not to exceed $334,010, to provide consultation and technical assistance to the Department on the Continuum of Care planning and resource development, for the period July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018. (53% Federal Medi-Cal Administrative Activities and 47% Housing Urban Development)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 48 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent to execute, on behalf of the Employment and Human Services Department, a purchase order amendment with Sharp Business Solutions, to increase the payment limit by $65,000, to a new payment limit of $164,000, with no change to the term of July 20, 2015, through July 19, 2018, for copier leases. (10% County, 48% State, 42% Federal)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 49 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Gupta Etwaru, M.D., in an amount not to exceed $1,461,000, to provide ophthalmology services at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center and Health Centers, for the period June 1, 2017 through May 31, 2020. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 50 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Tri-City Power, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $600,000, for uninterruptible power supply maintenance and repair services, for the period of July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2020, Countywide. (100% General Fund)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 51 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with West Contra Costa Youth Services Bureau a non-profit corporation in an amount not to exceed $250,000 to provide Child Welfare Redesign Differential Response Path 2 case management services in East and West Contra Costa County for the period of July 1, 2017 through June 20, 2018. (100% State)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 52 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Community Violence Solutions in an amount not to exceed $182,039 to provide Child Welfare Redesign Differential Response Path 2 case management services in West Contra Costa County for the period of July 1, 2017 through June 20, 2018. (100% State)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 14  AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 53 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Uplift Family Services, in an amount not to exceed $546,402 to provide family preservation and support services to families for the period of July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018. (30% County, 70% State)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 54 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Family Support Services, in an amount not to exceed $350,000 to provide comprehensive respite services for foster parents for the period of July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018. (100% State)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 55 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with the In-Home Support Services Public Authority in an amount not to exceed $2,215,660 to provide in-home support services for the period of July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018. (16% County, 30% State, 54% Federal)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 56 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Contra Costa Family Justice Alliance, in an amount not to exceed $150,000 to provide support services to victims of interpersonal violence and coordination of community family justice workshops for the period of July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018. (100% County)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 57 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with West Contra Costa County Meals on Wheels in an amount not to exceed $61,334, to provide home-delivered meals for the County’s Senior Nutrition Program, for the period July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018, with a three-month automatic extension through September 30, 2018, in an amount not to exceed $15,334. (100% Title III-C 2 of the Older Americans Act of funds)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 58 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a novation    June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 15 C. 58 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a novation contract with Meals on Wheels and Senior Outreach Services of Contra Costa, in an amount not to exceed $182,778, to provide congregate meals for the Senior Nutrition Program, for the period from July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018, with a three-month automatic extension through September 30, 2018, in an amount not to exceed $45,695. (100% Federal Title III-C1 of the Older Americans Act of 1965)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 59 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a novation contract with Meals on Wheels and Senior Outreach Services, in an amount not to exceed $376,637, to provide home-delivered meals for the Senior Nutrition Program, for the period July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018, with a three-month automatic extension through September 30, 2018, in an amount not to exceed $94,159. (100% federal Title III-C2 of the Older Americans Act of 1965)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 60 AUTHORIZE the Auditor-Controller to issue a warrant in the amount of $24,000 to the Contra Costa County Office of Education from the Child Care Mitigation Fund to help fund the 2017 Comprehensive Countywide Child Care Needs Assessment and Child Care Facility Study, as recommended by the Conservation and Development Director. (100% Child care mitigation fees)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 61 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent, on behalf of the Health Services Department, to execute a purchase order with UptoDate, in an amount not to exceed $146,616, for a one year site license for their medical information database to be used at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center, for the period from June 1, 2017 through May 31, 2018. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 62 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Conservation and Development Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Bodhaine Discing and Grading, to extend the term from June 30, 2017 through June 30, 2020 and increase the payment limit by $60,000 to a new payment limit of $120,000 to continue to provide weed abatement and general clean-up services. (100% Low Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 63 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent, on behalf of the Health Services    June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 16 C. 63 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent, on behalf of the Health Services Department, to execute a purchase order with AGFA Healthcare Corporation, in an amount not to exceed $312,735, for annual support and maintenance for Circles of Care diagnostic and cardiology imaging software; and to execute the Service Maintenance Agreement Terms and Conditions and Inventory Summary with AGFA Healthcare Corporation, for the period of April 1, 2017 through March 31, 2018. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 64 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent, on behalf of the Health Services Department, to execute a purchase order with Praxair Distribution, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $240,000, for oxygen and other gases for the Respiratory Therapy Unit at the Contra Costa Regional Medical Center and Health Centers, for the period June 1, 2017 through May 31, 2019. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 65 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent, on behalf of the Health Services Department, to execute a purchase order with Groupware Technology Inc., in an amount not to exceed $146,810, for a Rubrik Product Warranty and Support Services Policy, and Rubrik End User License and Limited Warranty Agreement with Rubrik Inc. for license, maintenance, and support of Rubrik appliances and software for the period from March 3, 2017 through January 2, 2019. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 66 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Aspira Technologies, Inc., to extend the termination date from June 30, 2017 to June 30, 2018, with no change in the payment limit of $352,250, to continue providing consulting and technical assistance to the Department’s Information Systems Unit. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 67 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent, on behalf of the Health Services Department, to execute a purchase order amendment with Mesa Laboratories, Inc., to add $99,000 to a new total of $198,000 for expanded and upgraded services, including calibration of thermometers services for the Contra Costa Regional Medical Center Nutritional Services and Laboratories, with no change in the term of March 1, 2016 through February 28, 2018. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 68 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent, on behalf of the Health Services    June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 17 C. 68 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent, on behalf of the Health Services Department, to execute a purchase order with One Workplace, in an amount not to exceed $124,000, for work stations and furniture for the Contra Costa Regional Medical Center and Contra Costa Health Centers, for the period of June 28, 2017 through June 27, 2018. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 69 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Concord Yellow Cab, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $300,000, to provide non-emergency taxicab transportation services to patients to and from Contra Costa Regional Medical Center, Health Centers and other County facilities, for the period from July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 70 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent, on behalf of the Health Services Department, to execute a purchase order with Experian Health Inc., in an amount not to exceed $356,400, for subscription and support services for Electronic Claims and Remittance Systems Software, for the period July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2019. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 71 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent, on behalf of the Health Services Department, to execute a purchase order with the Epic Systems Corporation, in an amount not to exceed $7,000,000, for maintenance of Epic Electronic Health Records System for Contra Costa Regional Medical Center, for the period from July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2020. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 72 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent, on behalf of the Health Services Department, to execute a purchase order amendment with Direct Systems Support, adjusting the end of the coverage period for IBM hardware maintenance support for EMC VMAX data storage equipment, from the previous end date of June 30, 2017 to October 9, 2017, with no changes to the amount; a purchase order with Direct Systems Support in an amount not to exceed $205,151, for annual support of the EMC VMAX data storage system; and the Statement of Work and Schedule with IBM to provide hardware maintenance support, for the period of October 10, 2017 through October 9, 2018. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 73 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent, on behalf of Health Services Department,   June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 18 C. 73 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent, on behalf of Health Services Department, to execute a purchase order with Coffey Communications, Inc., in the amount of $325,000, for printing the Contra Costa Health Plan members’ “Health Sense” newsletter, for the period from July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2019. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 74 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent, on behalf of the Health Services Director, to execute a purchase order amendment with OmniPro, LLC, to increase the payment limit by $750,000 to a new payment limit of $1,100,000, for additional custom Lenovo Tiny PC’s, monitors, Lenovo laptops and parts, and extend the termination date through August 31, 2018. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 75 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with All Health Services, Corporation in an amount not to exceed $1,183,000, to provide temporary staffing services at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center, Health Centers, and Detention Facilities for the period May 1, 2017 through April 30, 2018. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 76 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with MGA Healthcare, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $1,565,000, to provide temporary medical staffing and recruitment services at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center and Health Centers for the period from May 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 77 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with CareerStaff Unlimited, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $125,000, to provide temporary medical staffing services at the Contra Costa Regional Medical Center, Health Centers and Detention Facility for the period from May 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 78 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Sheriff-Coroner, or designee, to execute an amendment to the software site license and support agreement with Vigilant Solutions, LLC, in an amount not to exceed $278,600, for the provision of car mounted license plate readers for the term June 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018 with automatic annual renewals. (100% Restricted Special Tax and Donation revenue)        June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 19  AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Other Actions   C. 79 ADOPT Resolution 2017/175 establishing the East Richmond Heights Municipal Advisory Council, as recommended by Supervisor Gioia.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 80 ADOPT Resolution No. 2017/201 establishing appropriation limits for the County, County Service Areas, and County Special Districts for Fiscal Year 2017/2018, as recommended by the Auditor-Controller.       RELISTED to June 20, 2017.   C. 81 ACCEPT the Employment and Human Services Department Community Services Bureau 2017-2018 Planning Calendar for Head Start and Community Action programs, as approved by the Head Start Policy Council and recommended by the Employment and Human Services Director.        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 82 ADOPT Resolution No. 2017/214 agreeing to comply with the Surplus Land Act in order to receive certain funds distributed by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission, Countywide. (No fiscal impact)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 83 APPROVE the list of providers recommended by Contra Costa Health Plan's Peer Review and Credentialing Committee and by the Health Services Director, as required by the State Departments of Health Care Services, and Managed Health Care, and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 84 RECEIVE Civil Grand Jury Report No. 1702, entitled "Emergency Mass Care and Shelter: Are We Ready?", and FORWARD to the County Administrator for response.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 85 RECEIVE Civil Grand Jury Report No. 1703, entitled "Mental Health Services for At-Risk Children in Contra Costa County", and FORWARD to the County Administrator for response.        June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 20  AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 86 RECEIVE Civil Grand Jury Report No. 1704, "Selection of Ballot Measure Arguments", and FORWARD to the County Clerk-Recorder for response.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover   GENERAL INFORMATION The Board meets in all its capacities pursuant to Ordinance Code Section 24-2.402, including as the Housing Authority and the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency. Persons who wish to address the Board should complete the form provided for that purpose and furnish a copy of any written statement to the Clerk. Any disclosable public records related to an open session item on a regular meeting agenda and distributed by the Clerk of the Board to a majority of the members of the Board of Supervisors less than 72 hours prior to that meeting are available for public inspection at 651 Pine Street, First Floor, Room 106, Martinez, CA 94553, during normal business hours. All matters listed under CONSENT ITEMS are considered by the Board to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless requested by a member of the Board or a member of the public prior to the time the Board votes on the motion to adopt. Persons who wish to speak on matters set for PUBLIC HEARINGS will be heard when the Chair calls for comments from those persons who are in support thereof or in opposition thereto. After persons have spoken, the hearing is closed and the matter is subject to discussion and action by the Board. Comments on matters listed on the agenda or otherwise within the purview of the Board of Supervisors can be submitted to the office of the Clerk of the Board via mail: Board of Supervisors, 651 Pine Street Room 106, Martinez, CA 94553; by fax: 925-335-1913. The County will provide reasonable accommodations for persons with disabilities planning to attend Board meetings who contact the Clerk of the Board at least 24 hours before the meeting, at (925) 335-1900; TDD (925) 335-1915. An assistive listening device is available from the Clerk, Room 106. Copies of recordings of all or portions of a Board meeting may be purchased from the Clerk of the Board. Please telephone the Office of the Clerk of the Board, (925) 335-1900, to make the necessary arrangements. Forms are available to anyone desiring to submit an inspirational thought nomination for inclusion on the Board Agenda. Forms may be obtained at the Office of the County Administrator or Office of the Clerk of the Board, 651 Pine Street, Martinez, California. Applications for personal subscriptions to the weekly Board Agenda may be obtained by calling the Office of the Clerk of the Board, (925) 335-1900. The weekly agenda may also be viewed on the County’s Internet Web Page: www.co.contra-costa.ca.us STANDING COMMITTEES The Airport Committee (Supervisors Karen Mitchoff and Diane Burgis) meets on the fourth Wednesday of the month at 1:30 p.m. at the Director of Airports Office, 550 Sally Ride Drive, Concord. The Family and Human Services Committee (Supervisors John Gioia and Candace Andersen) meets on the fourth June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 21 Monday of the month at 10:30 a.m. in Room 101, County Administration Building, 651 Pine Street, Martinez. The Finance Committee (Supervisors Karen Mitchoff and John Gioia) meets on the fourth Monday of the month at 9:00 a.m. in Room 101, County Administration Building, 651 Pine Street, Martinez. The Hiring Outreach Oversight Committee (Supervisors Federal D. Glover and Candace Andersen) meets on the first Monday of every other month at 1:00 p.m. in Room 101, County Administration Building, 651 Pine Street, Martinez. The Internal Operations Committee (Supervisors Candace Andersen and Diane Burgis) meets on the second Monday of the month at 1:00 p.m. in Room 101, County Administration Building, 651 Pine Street, Martinez. The Legislation Committee (Supervisors Diane Burgis and Karen Mitchoff) meets on the second Monday of the month at 10:30 a.m. in Room 101, County Administration Building, 651 Pine Street, Martinez. The Public Protection Committee (Supervisors Federal D. Glover and John Gioia) meets on the first Monday of the month at 10:30 a.m. in Room 101, County Administration Building, 651 Pine Street, Martinez. The Transportation, Water & Infrastructure Committee (Supervisors Diane Burgis and Karen Mitchoff) meets on the second Monday of the month at 9:00 a.m. in Room 101, County Administration Building, 651 Pine Street, Martinez. Airports Committee June 28, 2017 1:30 p.m.See above Family & Human Services Committee June 26, 2017 10:30 a.m.See above Finance Committee June 26, 2017 9:00 a.m. See above Hiring Outreach Oversight Committee August 7, 2017 Cancelled Next Meeting TBD TBD See above Internal Operations Committee July 10, 2017 1:00 p.m. See above Legislation Committee July 10, 2017 10:30 a.m. See above Public Protection Committee July 3, 2017 10:30 a.m. See above Transportation, Water & Infrastructure Committee July 10, 2017 9:00 a.m. See above PERSONS WHO WISH TO ADDRESS THE BOARD DURING PUBLIC COMMENT OR WITH RESPECT TO AN ITEM THAT IS ON THE AGENDA, MAY BE LIMITED TO TWO (2) MINUTES A LUNCH BREAK MAY BE CALLED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE BOARD CHAIR AGENDA DEADLINE: Thursday, 12 noon, 12 days before the Tuesday Board meetings. Glossary of Acronyms, Abbreviations, and other Terms (in alphabetical order): Contra Costa County has a policy of making limited use of acronyms, abbreviations, and industry-specific language in its Board of Supervisors meetings and written materials. Following is a list of commonly used language that may appear in oral presentations and written materials associated with Board meetings: AB Assembly Bill ABAG Association of Bay Area Governments ACA Assembly Constitutional Amendment ADA Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 AFSCME American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 22 AICP American Institute of Certified Planners AIDS Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome ALUC Airport Land Use Commission AOD Alcohol and Other Drugs ARRA American Recovery & Reinvestment Act of 2009 BAAQMD Bay Area Air Quality Management District BART Bay Area Rapid Transit District BayRICS Bay Area Regional Interoperable Communications System BCDC Bay Conservation & Development Commission BGO Better Government Ordinance BOS Board of Supervisors CALTRANS California Department of Transportation CalWIN California Works Information Network CalWORKS California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids CAER Community Awareness Emergency Response CAO County Administrative Officer or Office CCCPFD (ConFire) Contra Costa County Fire Protection District CCHP Contra Costa Health Plan CCTA Contra Costa Transportation Authority CCRMC Contra Costa Regional Medical Center CCWD Contra Costa Water District CDBG Community Development Block Grant CFDA Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CIO Chief Information Officer COLA Cost of living adjustment ConFire (CCCFPD) Contra Costa County Fire Protection District CPA Certified Public Accountant CPI Consumer Price Index CSA County Service Area CSAC California State Association of Counties CTC California Transportation Commission dba doing business as DSRIP Delivery System Reform Incentive Program EBMUD East Bay Municipal Utility District ECCFPD East Contra Costa Fire Protection District EIR Environmental Impact Report EIS Environmental Impact Statement EMCC Emergency Medical Care Committee EMS Emergency Medical Services EPSDT Early State Periodic Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment Program (Mental Health) et al. et alii (and others) FAA Federal Aviation Administration FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency F&HS Family and Human Services Committee First 5 First Five Children and Families Commission (Proposition 10) FTE Full Time Equivalent FY Fiscal Year GHAD Geologic Hazard Abatement District GIS Geographic Information System HCD (State Dept of) Housing & Community Development HHS (State Dept of ) Health and Human Services HIPAA Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act HIV Human Immunodeficiency Syndrome HOV High Occupancy Vehicle June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 23 HR Human Resources HUD United States Department of Housing and Urban Development IHSS In-Home Supportive Services Inc. Incorporated IOC Internal Operations Committee ISO Industrial Safety Ordinance JPA Joint (exercise of) Powers Authority or Agreement Lamorinda Lafayette-Moraga-Orinda Area LAFCo Local Agency Formation Commission LLC Limited Liability Company LLP Limited Liability Partnership Local 1 Public Employees Union Local 1 LVN Licensed Vocational Nurse MAC Municipal Advisory Council MBE Minority Business Enterprise M.D. Medical Doctor M.F.T. Marriage and Family Therapist MIS Management Information System MOE Maintenance of Effort MOU Memorandum of Understanding MTC Metropolitan Transportation Commission NACo National Association of Counties NEPA National Environmental Policy Act OB-GYN Obstetrics and Gynecology O.D. Doctor of Optometry OES-EOC Office of Emergency Services-Emergency Operations Center OPEB Other Post Employment Benefits OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration PARS Public Agencies Retirement Services PEPRA Public Employees Pension Reform Act Psy.D. Doctor of Psychology RDA Redevelopment Agency RFI Request For Information RFP Request For Proposal RFQ Request For Qualifications RN Registered Nurse SB Senate Bill SBE Small Business Enterprise SEIU Service Employees International Union SUASI Super Urban Area Security Initiative SWAT Southwest Area Transportation Committee TRANSPAC Transportation Partnership & Cooperation (Central) TRANSPLAN Transportation Planning Committee (East County) TRE or TTE Trustee TWIC Transportation, Water and Infrastructure Committee UASI Urban Area Security Initiative VA Department of Veterans Affairs vs. versus (against) WAN Wide Area Network WBE Women Business Enterprise WCCTAC West Contra Costa Transportation Advisory Committee June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 24 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 25 RECOMMENDATION(S): INTERVIEW five finalists for the Board of Supervisors Appointee #5, #9, and the Alternate to BOS Appointees #4, #5, #6 and #9 seats on the Contra Costa County Employees' Retirement Association Board of Trustees, and DETERMINE what action the Board wishes to take regarding the appointments: Debora Allen, (Incumbent, Appointee #5 seat), Clayton Jerry Holcombe (Incumbent, Alternate to Members 4, 5, 6, & 9 seat), Walnut Creek Jay Kwon, Danville John Phillips (Incumbent, Appointee #9 seat), Moraga Dennis Reigle, Alamo FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact to the County. Retirement Board Trustees receive a stipend of $100 per meeting, plus mileage reimbursement, paid by CCCERA. BACKGROUND: It is the Board of Supervisors policy to conduct an open recruitment for all vacancies to At Large seats appointed by the Board. The Board has directed that its Internal Operations Committee (IOC) to personally conduct interviews of applicants for At Large seats on several boards, committees, and commissions including the Contra Costa County Employees' Retirement Association (CCCERA) Board of Trustees (Retirement Board). APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes:See Addendum VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Julie DiMaggio Enea (925) 335-1077 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: D. 1 To:Board of Supervisors From:INTERNAL OPERATIONS COMMITTEE Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:INTERVIEWS AND APPOINTMENT FOR THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS APPOINTEE #4 SEAT ON THE RETIREMENT BOARD June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 26 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) > On June 30, 2017, the terms of three Board of Supervisors-appointed seats on the Retirement Board will expire, creating three vacancies (the term for seat #6 will also expire on June 30, 2017 but the Board of Supervisors already re-appointed Supervisor Candace Andersen to that seat): Board of Supervisors Appointee #5 Board of Supervisors Appointee #9 Alternate to BOS Appointees #4, #5, #6 and #9 The IOC opened the recruitment on March 3, 2017. For advisory body vacancies, our standard advertising includes: Posting a notice in the News Flash section of the County's homepage for the duration of the nomination period. Promoting with a recruitment announcement on CCTV’s CountyNet bulletin board Emailing to area print/online publications, plus KCBS Radio and KKDV Radio. At the conclusion of the five-week filing period, ten applications were received and nine applicants were qualified, of which one later withdrew, leaving eight candidates, including the incumbents, who the IOC interviewed on May 8, 2017. As a result of those interviews, the IOC recommends five finalists, who have been invited to an interview with the Board of Supervisors this morning beginning at 9:00 a.m. Attached are the applications and resumes provided by each finalist. Members of the Retirement Board have fiduciary responsibility for the assets, investments of monies, and administration of the Retirement System. The assets of the Retirement System are trust funds. The members of the Retirement Board must discharge their duties with the care, skill, prudence, and diligence that a prudent person acting in the same capacity and familiar with these matters would use. The Retirement Board’s duty to its participants and their beneficiaries takes precedence over any other duty. As fiduciaries, members of the Retirement Board have a loyalty to members of the Retirement System. Persons appointed to the Retirement Board must be prepared to spend the amount of time necessary to properly perform their fiduciary duties. Each candidate received the attached summary of time commitment estimate in advance of the interviews and has stated that they are willing and able to honor the commitment. A complete list of candidates and their applications are available on the County's website at this link. The new term of office for the three seats begins on July 1, 2017 and ends on June 30, 2020. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: To ensure continuing full representation of the Board of Supervisors at Retirement Board meetings after July 1, the Board should make its new appointments no later than at its June 20 meeting. CLERK'S ADDENDUM INTERVIEWED four finalists (Debora Allen withdrew her application); APPOINTED Jerry Holcombe as Appointee #5, John Phillips as Appointee #9 and Jay Kwon as Alternate to Appointees #4, #5, #6 and #9. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Press Publication_County Retirement Board Retirement Board Time Commitment CCCERA Finalists Candidate Matrix Candidate Application_Debora Allen_CCCERA Candidate Application_Jerry Holcombe_CCCERA Candidate Application_Jay Kwon_CCCERA Resume_Jay Kwon_CCCERA June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 27 Resume_Jay Kwon_CCCERA Candidate Application_John Phillips_CCCERA Resume_John Phillips_CCCERA Candidate Application_Dennis MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Allen Withdrawal Letter June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 28 Contra Costa County County Administrator’s Office • 651 Pine Street • Martinez, CA 94553 • www.co.contra-costa.ca.us Media Release FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Julie DiMaggio Enea Friday, March 3, 2017 Phone: (925) 335-1077 Email: julie.enea@cao.cccounty.us WOULD YOU LIKE TO SERVE ON THE RETIREMENT BOARD? The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors is seeking individuals with a sound business background, experience in pension fund investment or administration, or in equity investments or banking, to serve on the Contra Costa County Employees’ Retirement Association Board of Trustees. To be considered, candidates must be County residents, must not be Retirement System members or retirees, and may not market any investment, consulting, or related service to the Contra Costa County Retirement Board or any other 1937 Act Retirement Board. Regular meetings of the Retirement Board are held the second and fourth Wednesdays of each month beginning at 9:00 a.m. and sometimes extending into the afternoon. There may also be additional meetings on special topics that arise from time to time. Members of the Retirement Board receive $100 per meeting up to a monthly maximum of $500, plus reimbursement for actual and necessary expenses. The County is seeking to fill two regular seats and one alternate seat. The appointments will be for full three-year terms beginning July 1, 2017 and ending June 30, 2020. Application forms can be obtained from the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors by calling (925) 335-1900 or by visiting the County website at www.co.contra-costa.ca.us. Applications should be returned to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, Room 106, County Administration Building, 651 Pine Street, Martinez, CA 94553, no later than 5:00 p.m. on Friday, April 7, 2017. Applicants should plan to be available for public interviews on Monday, May 8, 2017. Further information about the Retirement Board can be obtained by calling CCCERA CEO Gail Strohl at (925) 521-3960 or by visiting the website www.cccera.org. # # # # June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 29 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION RETIREMENT BOARD MEMBERSHIP TIME COMMITMENTS, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, FIDUCIARY LIABILITY Regular Meetings The Board normally holds its regular business meeting the second and fourth Wednesdays of each month except in May and November, when the meeting scheduled for the second Wednesday is usually moved to the first Wednesday of the month. Meetings begin at 9:00 a.m. and most often end before 4:00 p.m. The agenda and meeting materials are mailed 6 days before the meeting. Reviewing the packet and preparing for a meeting takes up to 4-5 hours. Post-meeting time can vary from 1-4 hours. Appointed Board members receive a stipend of $100 per Board meeting, regardless of the length of time of the meeting. There is no reimbursement for time spent at seminars and onsite visits. Special Meetings The Board holds special meetings to hear presentations from firms during a manager search, to review results of the annual actuarial valuation, to meet with investment managers to review performance, and to meet with advisors and consultants on matters of particular interest, which may arise from time to time. Typically there are 4-6 of these additional meetings each year and are typically scheduled for a morning starting time. Preparation also varies depending on the subject matter. Standing Committees The Board currently has one standing committee (Audit), which meets at least once per quarter. Miscellaneous Time Board members are provided with subscriptions to several pension and investment- related magazines and periodicals that are intended to help the trustee stay informed on events, products, regulations, providers, concepts, innovations, controversies, and people as they relate to pension fund administration. Time to review these materials varies depending on the extent to which the trustee feels the need for this information. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 30 Travel and Training The Retirement Board serves as fiduciary for the Association’s Trust. As fiduciaries, Board members are held to the “prudent person” standard on investment decisions. For this reason, the Board places a great deal of emphasis on continuing education of its members. Trustees are encouraged to attend seminars and conferences dealing with benefits administration and investments. These educational opportunities are regularly placed on the Board meeting agenda. The association reimburses Board members for expenses incurred in conjunction with any training specifically authorized. The typical Board member spends from 7-12 days attending educational seminars and conferences each year. This typically can be much higher for the first few years of Board membership due to the learning curve for public defined benefit plans and investments. On Site Visits Board procedure is to perform on site visits with newly approved investment managers before hire, and existing managers on a periodic basis. These visits include travel, both local and across the country, and should be performed by all Board members on a rotating basis. Note: Travel expenses are reimbursed in accordance with CCCERA’s Travel Policy. Conflicts of Interest Board members are prohibited from marketing any investment, consulting or related service to the Board or to the Boards of any other 1937 Act Retirement Systems. For example, if a Board member is employed by XYZ Advisors, a firm that provides investment or consulting services to institutional investors, it is not legal for that Board member to market XYZ’s services to the Board, or any other 1937 Act Retirement System Board. The same applies if the Board member is employed by XYZ Advisors and markets, or provides investment or consulting in an ongoing relationship with the Board or any other 1937 Act Retirement Board. Board members are required to file disclosure forms each year. Such things as sources of income for the Board member and his or her spouse, property ownership, partnerships, investments, and gifts are required to be disclosed. All disclosure documents are open to the public. Fiduciary Liability Trustees are held to a strict code of conduct in every decision they make as Board members. Although infrequent in the public sector, a Board member can be sued for personal liability arising from a decision or action by the Board. The Association procures fiduciary liability insurance to cover the Board in its official capacity but is precluded by law from purchasing similar coverage for personal liability of each Board member. Such coverage is, however, available to Board members at a nominal cost. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 31 SUMMARY OF TIME COMMITMENTS MEETINGS Minimum Maximum Hours/Year Hours/Year Monthly Meetings Prep. Time 120 216 Meeting 144 160 Special Meetings Prep. Time 8 12 Meeting 20 30 TOTAL 292 418 EDUCATION 7 – 12+ days per year attending out-of-town seminars and conferences. ON SITE VISITS 2 – 6 days per year attending out of town on site visits with investment managers June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 32 FINALISTS2017 CCC RECRUITMENT FOR CCCERA TRUSTEESNAME DISTRICTCITYEDUCATIONCURRENT EMPLOYER CURRENT TITLE/POSITION VOLUNTEER ACTIVITYEXPERIENCEFIDUCIARY EXPERTISEAllen, Debora A. IV ClaytonBS with graduate training:‐BS in Business/Accounting from Cal State Univ Sacramento‐24 semester units in Taxation from Golden Gate Univ‐ inactive CPA license‐Wharton Bus School certificateW.E. Lyons Construction,Walnut CreekSince 2016, elected member of BART BoardChief Financial Officer/ShareholderCCCERA board member since 2012; served on multiple non‐profit boardsManagement/administration of finance, accounting, HR, IT, risk management, operational workflow, and marketing; CPA consultingCCCERA board member since 2012Holcombe, Jerry? Walnut CreekBS in Biological Sciences from Cal Poly, San Luis ObispoRetired from Delta Dental Plan of CA, SFSenior Vice President, Gen ServicesCCCERA Board Alternate since 2008Administrative oversight ov HR, corporate communications, PR, advertising, claims, processing, IT and legalCCCERA board alternate since 2008; chair of corporate 401K committeeKwon, JayII DanvilleBA, MA & MBA:‐BA in Economics from Stanford Univ‐MA in Economics from Cal State Hayward‐MBA in Business from Univ of Oxford‐Chartered Financial Analyst and  Chartered Alternative Investment Analyst designationsSince 2014, City of San Jose, Office of Retirement ServicesInvestment Officer None listed.External investment management, investment portfolio management, tradingInvestment officer for City of San Jose Office of RetirementPhillips, JohnII MoragaBS, MBAs:‐BS, University of California, Berkeley‐1966    MBA, University of California, Berkeley‐1972        MBA (taxation), Golden Gate UniversityCPA/CA Enrolled ActuarySince 2007, John B. Phillips, CPAOwner/Investor/ConsultantNone listed.Employee benefits admin, pension actuary and consultant, American Academy of Actuaries, investment portfolio managementCCCERA board member since 2011; investment portfolio management at Cal CPA HealthReigle, DennisII AlamoBA/MBA:‐BA in Psychology from Univ of Cincinnati‐MBA in Business from Harvard UnivRetired in 2001 from Arthur Andersen LLPManaging Partner, Partner Matters and HR, North AmericaMany philanthropic organizations in the area of educationManaging Partner at Arthur Andersen, investment committee, trustee on fellowship foundation, non‐profit education sectorChaired investment committee for pension and profit sharing plans at Arthur AndersonJune 13, 2017Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors33 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 34 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 35 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 36 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 37 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 38 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 39 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 40 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 41 Submit Date: Apr 07, 2017 Status: submitted First Name Middle Initial Last Name Email Address Home Address Suite or Apt City State Postal Code Primary Phone Employer Job Title Occupation Contra Costa County Boards & Commissions Application Form Profile This application is used for all boards and commissions Do you, or a business in which you have a financial interest, have a contract with Contra Costa Co.? Yes No Is a member of your family (or step-family) employed by Contra Costa Co.? Yes No Interests & Experiences Which Boards would you like to apply for? Contra Costa County Employees Retirement Association (CCCERA) Jay Kwon Danville CA 94526 Home: City of San Jose Investment Officer External Investment Manager Jay Kwon Page 1 of 4 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 42 Upload a Resume Dates (Month, Day, Year) From - To Hours per Week Worked? Please describe your interest in serving as a member of the board(s) you have selected and if applicable which seat you are applying for. I am applying for an Appointed Seat on the CCCERA Retirement Board. I am currently an Investment Officer at the Office of Retirement Services for the City of San Jose, and have a deep-seated professional interest in the management of public pension systems. Additionally, as a Contra Costa County resident, I have a vested interest in the health and viability of CCCERA. I feel that I can provide a unique perspective informed by my professional experience working with (and for) public pensions for nearly 15 years. Have you previously served on a government or non-profit board or committee? No Please describe how your education, work experience, or other activities have prepared you to serve on the board or commission you have selected. I work as an Investment Officer at the Office of Retirement Services for the City of San Jose. I am part of a team that manages a combined $5B in assets for the City’s two defined benefit pension plans. Most of what I do as a part of the investment team is analogous to the role that CCCERA’s investment staff performs; my daily professional responsibilities provide directly applicable insights to the issues confronting the CCCERA Board. Additionally, much of my prior work experience involved structuring custom investment solutions for public pensions, which should aid my ability to evaluate the complex issues facing the CCCERA Board. My professional experience, in combination with educational credentials (BA Economics, MA Economics, MBA, CFA and CAIA charter holder), would aid my ability to complete my fiduciary duties as a Board member, and could add value to the existing Board. Work History Please provide information on your last three positions, including your current one if you are working. 1st (Most Recent) Jay_Kwon_--_resume.docx 9/2/14 - present 60 Jay Kwon Page 2 of 4 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 43 Position Title Dates (Month, Day, Year) From - To Hours per Week Worked? Position Title Volunteer Work? Yes No Employer's Name and Address 1737 North First Street, 6th Floor, San José CA 95112 Duties Performed Manage the Public Equity allocation of the City’s pension plans to maximize plan level risk-adjusted returns 2nd Volunteer Work? Yes No Employer's Name and Address Bank of New York Mellon Beta and Transition Management 50 Fremont, Ste 1600, San Francisco, CA 94105 Duties Performed Lead PM for a product line of derivatives-based hedging and overlay solutions. 3rd Investment Officer 9/1/08 - 9/1/14 60 Senior Portfolio Manager Jay Kwon Page 3 of 4 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 44 Dates (Month, Day, Year) From - To Hours per Week Worked? Position Title Volunteer Work? Yes No Employer's Name and Address Mellon Transition Management Services; San Francisco, CA 50 Fremont, Ste 1600, San Francisco, CA 94105 Duties Performed Managed fixed income portfolio transitions. 9/1/03 - 9/1/07 60 Portfolio Manager / Trader Jay Kwon Page 4 of 4 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 45 JAY KWON, CFA CAIA 2014-Present: Investment Officer, Public Equities Office of Retirement Services, City of San Jose; San Jose, CA Manage the Public Equity allocation of the City’s pension plans to maximize plan level risk-adjusted returns. - Create and implement an allocation structure consistent with the Plans’ investment outlook - Oversee the City’s externally managed Public Equity investments; advise the CIO and Board on hiring, resizing, and terminating external investment managers - Recommend and implement a public equity tactical asset allocation to the CIO and Board Relevant projects: - Implemented a passive currency overlay to partially hedge the Plans’ non-USD exposure - Recommended funding the City’s first risk premium-based equity strategy - Utilized the Plans’ derivatives overlay to synthetically rebalance equity exposures - Initiated the Plans’ quantitative risk assessment of the Public Equity allocation 2008-2014: Vice President, Senior Portfolio Manager Bank of New York Mellon Beta and Transition Management; San Francisco, CA Lead PM for a product line of derivatives-based hedging and overlay solutions. - Served as the product expert for prospects, clients and investment consultants - Executed client hedges; developed and maintained appropriate models to calculate trades and rebalances - Designed and executed trade and rebalancing processes, and managed collateral margining 2003-2007: Fixed Income Portfolio Manager / Trader Mellon Transition Management Services; San Francisco, CA Managed fixed income portfolio transitions. 1999-2003: Financial Analyst Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco; San Francisco, CA Analyzed risks of the FHLBSF interest rate swap portfolio. 1998-1999: Research Analyst Energy and Environmental Economics, San Francisco, CA EDUCATION AND CERTIFICATIONS 2008: MBA, University of Oxford, Said Business School 2003: MA Economics, CSU Hayward 1998: BA Economics (minor Mathematics), Stanford University CFA charter holder, CAIA charter holder June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 46 Submit Date: Mar 18, 2017 Status: submitted First Name Middle Initial Last Name Email Address Home Address Suite or Apt City State Postal Code Primary Phone Employer Job Title Occupation Contra Costa County Boards & Commissions Application Form Profile This application is used for all boards and commissions Do you, or a business in which you have a financial interest, have a contract with Contra Costa Co.? Yes No Is a member of your family (or step-family) employed by Contra Costa Co.? Yes No Interests & Experiences Which Boards would you like to apply for? Contra Costa County Employees Retirement Association (CCCERA) JOHN B.PHILLIPS Moraga CA 94556 Home: John B. Phillips, CPA Owner Investor/consultant JOHN B. PHILLIPS Page 1 of 4 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 47 Upload a Resume Dates (Month, Day, Year) From - To Hours per Week Worked? Please describe your interest in serving as a member of the board(s) you have selected. My interest is to continue to serve the community/county in which I live by using the actuarial, accounting and managerial skills and experience I have developed over a long professional career. If selected for a third appointed term, I believe that my background and current CCCERA Board experience, including serving as Chair for the current and prior fiscal years, will continue to allow me to remain an effective member of the Board of Retirement. Have you previously served on a government or non-profit board or committee? I have served as a board member of the Tau Kappa Epsilon Educational Foundation for approximately the past ten (10) years. This non-profit foundation provides scholarships for qualifying members and supports various educational and leadership programs. Please describe how your education, work experience, or other activities have prepared you to serve on the board or commission you have selected. My first career, spanning 31 years, was primarily spent in the employee benefits field where I practiced as a pension actuary and consultant while taking the lead role in building and leading a large actuarial and consulting practice. Consequently, I have a long standing and active interest in the design and operation of pension plans. I am a member of the American Academy of Actuaries and a CPA with an active California license. As the first CEO of a health insurance company now known as CalCPA Health (and formerly known as California CPA ProtectPlus), I established and managed its investment portfolio during my employment tenure and continue to sit on its oversight board finance committee. Finally, my undergraduate degree from the University of California, Berkeley was in finance and, together with MBAs from Cal (emphasis accounting) and Golden Gate University (taxation), my educational background is very aligned with performing the duties of a CCCERA trustee. Work History Please provide information on your last three positions, including your current one if you are working. 1st (Most Recent) CURRICULUM_VITAE_- _Phillips_2015.rtf 1/1/2007 - Present 25 JOHN B. PHILLIPS Page 2 of 4 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 48 Position Title Dates (Month, Day, Year) From - To Hours per Week Worked? Position Title Volunteer Work? Yes No Employer's Name and Address John B. Phillips, CPA Moraga, CA 94556 Duties Performed I operate a number of partnerships and trusts, invest a substantial amount of money for family and friends, serve on both local and national non-profit boards, serve as a board member for CalCPA Health and, for the last six (6) years, have served as a CCCERA board member, the last two (2) as its Chair. 2nd Volunteer Work? Yes No Employer's Name and Address CalCPA Health (formerly California CPA ProtectPlus) 1800 Gateway Drive, Suite 201 San Mateo, CA 94404 Duties Performed Chief Executive for a health insurance company serving the small and medium sized CPA firm community. 3rd Owner/Investor/Consultant 10/1/1997 - 12/31/2006 50 Chief Executive Officer JOHN B. PHILLIPS Page 3 of 4 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 49 Dates (Month, Day, Year) From - To Hours per Week Worked? Position Title Volunteer Work? Yes No Employer's Name and Address PwC (formerly PricewaterhouseCoopers) San Francisco, CA Duties Performed West Region Managing Partner for the Human Resources Advisory Group of Coopers & Lybrand (I retired just prior to the merger of Coopers & Lybrand with Price Waterhouse), with approximately 200 employees in practice groups in Los Angeles, San Francisco and Seattle. 9/1/1966 - 9/30/1997 50 Regional Managing Partner JOHN B. PHILLIPS Page 4 of 4 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 50 CURRICULUM VITAE Name: John B. Phillips Reason for Desiring to Serve as a Trustee: In my two previous careers I served as both an employee benefits consultant and as the first executive director of the Group Insurance Trust. I believe that both of those long term roles, together with my accounting, actuarial and tax background have been, and will continue to be, of significant value in my meeting my responsibilities as a member of the Board of Trustees. Professional Experience: 2007-Present Consultant/Investor 2011-Present Member of the Board of Trustees (and current Chair 1974 – 1997 Regional Managing Partner, Coopers & Lybrand (now PricewaterhouseCoopers), West Region, Human Resource Advisory Group 1966 – 1974 Professional Staff, Coopers & Lybrand Professional Affiliations: 1972 – Present Board of Trustees of the Group Insurance Trust (and the predecessor Administrative Committee of the Group Insurance Trust) 1968 – Present California Society of CPAs 1970 – 2006 Western Pension and Benefits Conference 1976 – Present American Academy of Actuaries 1998 – 2006 California Association of Small Employer Health Plans 1998 – 2006 The Association Healthcare Coalition 1997 – 2006 Self-Insurance Institute of America Education: 1962 BS, University of California, Berkeley 1966 MBA, University of California, Berkeley 1972 MBA (taxation), Golden Gate University 1963 Professional Licenses: 1967 Certified Public Accountant - California 1976 Enrolled Actuary 1968 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 51 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 52 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 53 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 54 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 55 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 56 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 57 RECOMMENDATION(S): OPEN the public hearing, RECEIVE testimony, and CLOSE the public hearing.1. INTRODUCE Ordinance No. 2017-01 to establish restrictions on the retail sales of emerging tobacco products such as electronic smoking devices and flavored tobacco products, regulate the sale of menthol cigarettes, prohibit tobacco retailing in pharmacies, and establish a cap on the number of tobacco retailer licenses issued by the County; WAIVE reading; and FIX June 20, 2017 for adoption. 2. ADOPT Ordinance No. 2017-10 to regulate the location of tobacco retailing businesses and prohibit the establishment of hookah lounges, vapor lounges, and significant tobacco retailing businesses. 3. DIRECT the Health Services Department to report back to Family and Human Services Committee on the implementation of the ordinances on an annual basis. 4. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS Contact: Daniel Peddycord, (925) 313-6700 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: , Deputy cc: D. 2 To:Board of Supervisors From:FAMILY & HUMAN SERVICES COMMITTEE Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:Tobacco Retailer Regulations June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 58 RECOMMENDATION(S): (CONT'D) > FISCAL IMPACT: A portion of the Prop 99 and Prop 56 funding Contra Costa Health Services Department receives for its Tobacco Prevention Program will be allocated to coordinating and implementing directions provided by the Board of Supervisors. Tobacco Retailer licensing fees, currently $287 per retailer, can also be used to conduct outreach, education and compliance inspections to tobacco retailers on the ordinance amendments and new requirements. Implementation of these ordinances will have no impact on the General Fund. BACKGROUND: The review of policy options to protect youth from tobacco influences in the retail environment was first referred to the Family and Human Services Committee on May 5, 2015. At this meeting the Board of Supervisors accepted the Health Services Department's 2013 Health Stores for a Healthy Community Report and directed staff to develop and present a report on recommendations. On May 24, 2016, the Board accepted the second report on Policy Options to Protect Youth from Tobacco Influences in the Retail Environment and directed staff to work with County Counsel to draft ordinances with policy provisions and report to the Planning Commission if applicable. On April 24, 2017, the Family and Human Services Committee (F&HS) received a report from the Health Services Department, which included draft ordinances, information regarding the presentation to the Planning Commission, and education to tobacco retailers on the draft ordinance provisions. The Family and Human Services Committee accepted the Department's recommendations and directed staff to forward the report and draft ordinances to the full Board for further consideration. The Committee also directed the department to prepare additional information for Board discussion. The additional information requested for clarifications related to 1) the potential impact on cigars if prohibiting the sale of all flavored tobacco products, 2) the rationale behind the proposed packaging size minimums for cigars and cigarillos, and 3) the potential impact of the proposed 10-year sun-setting clause on current tobacco retailing businesses. Please see the attached Staff Report in response to the additional information requested by F&HS and prepared by the Department for Board discussion. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The County will not adopt ordinances restricting the retail sales and businesses of certain tobacco products. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: Tobacco products are still being promoted to children through availability of youth-friendly flavored tobacco products and inexpensive small packs of these products; exposure to tobacco marketing in the retail environment; and the sale and marketing of tobacco products near schools and other youth sensitive areas. Policy options exist to amend County Code to address these issues and will discourage youth from tobacco use and promote healthier communities, which addresses the following children's outcome: (5) Communities that are Safe and Provide a High Quality of Life for Children and Families. CLERK'S ADDENDUM Speakers: Phillip Gardiner, African American Tobacco Central Leadership Council; Mark Block, Electronic Vaping Coalition of America; Mark Keiman, Botech Analysis; Melvin Willis, resident of Richmond; Jaime Rojas, NATO (handout); Mike Easter, resident of Fairfield; Jas Singh, Greater Bay Franchisee Owners Association; Stefan Didak, Not Blowing Smoke; Sallie Goetsch, resident of Oakley; Dee Kalza, resident of Richmond; Rich Marianos, Law Enforcement, Gainesville Virginia; Paul Sekhon; Jade Greene, resident of Antioch; David Alga; Kayle Loftis; Manjit Puraeante, 7-Eleven Franchise Owners Association; James Jack, Cigar Association of America; Nilesh Patel, resident of Concord; Sheena Grewall, 7-Eleven; Jaspal Dadhwal, resident of Vacaville; Shashi Paul, resident of Vacaville; Dilaver Singh, Gas City Inc.; Aasin Ali, Fast & Easy APLA; Ryan Durkin, Core-Mark; Nancy Ybarra, resident of Richmond; Bob Gordon, Tobacco Prevention Coalition; Laura Nathan, resident of Lafayette; Cynthia LeBlanc, resident of Richmond; Margo Connolly, American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network; SanJin Patel, APCA; Liz Williams, Americans for Nonsmokers’ Rights; Mary Jaccodiane, CCC Tobacco Prevention June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 59 Coalition; Jaime Rich, Center for Human Development; Carol McGruder, African American Tobacco Control Leadership Council; Lori Bremner, American Cancer society Cancer Action Network; Guadalupe Alaniz, Monument Impact; Azucena Virgen, Monument Impact; Azucena Torrez, monument Impact; Blanca Colin, Monument Impact; Ryan Orihood; Lamont Hill, resident of Richmond; Alison Wohlgemuth, resident of Brentwood; Rosalyn Muge, Project Ride; Britni Boden, Project Ride; Nicole Reyes, Project Ride; Karina Avila, Project Ride; Nya Taylor, Contra Costa Youth Health Coalition Courage; Randy Uang, Breathe California-Golden Gate Public Health Partnership; Paul Escobar, Project Ride; Lanier Clarke, BACK; Alishba & Noi Mer; Karina Guadalupe, resident of Richmond; Nancy Sullivan; Nancy Newhart, resident of Walnut Creek; Genevieve Smith, MDUUC; Paul Cummings, Tobacco Control Coalition; Ratib Norzei, resident of Fremont. Comments submitted in writing attached. The Board discussed and voted upon the new provisions proposed for the tobacco product control ordinance and zoning ordinance. a. Require a Tobacco Retailer License for all retailers selling traditional and/or emerging tobacco products : AYES: Gioia, Andersen, Burgis, Mitchoff, Glover b. Prohibit the sale of flavored (non-cigarette) tobacco products (smokeless, little cigars, hookah tobacco and dissolvable tobacco products, vape pens, vapor solutions, e-cigarettes) within all of the unincorporated area AYES: Gioia, Glover NOES: Andersen, Burgis, Mitchoff c. Prohibit the sale of menthol flavored cigarettes within all the unincorporated area AYES: Gioia, Andersen, Burgis, Mitchoff, Glover d. Require minimum pack size of 10 for cigars, excluding premium cigars that cost $5 or more AYES: Gioia, Andersen, Burgis, Mitchoff, Glover e. Prohibit sale of tobacco products in pharmacies in the unincorporated area AYES: Gioia, Andersen, Burgis, Glover NOES: Mitchoff f. Require tobacco retailers to comply with storefront signage laws AYES: Gioia, Andersen, Burgis, Mitchoff, Glover g. Require tobacco retailers to comply with drug paraphernalia sales laws AYES: Gioia, Andersen, Burgis, Mitchoff, Glover h. Require tobacco retailers to check ID of customer who appear younger than 27 AYES: Gioia, Andersen, Burgis, Mitchoff, Glover i. Limit or “cap” the number of retailers that can sell tobacco products AYES: Gioia, Andersen, Burgis, Mitchoff, Glover j. Remove tobacco advertising during license suspension AYES: Gioia, Andersen, Burgis, Mitchoff, Glover k. Expand time period reviewed for prior violations of license from 2 years to 5 years AYES: Gioia, Andersen, Burgis, Mitchoff, Glover l. 1. Prohibit locations of a new tobacco retailer within 1000 feet of schools, parks, playgrounds and libraries AYES: Gioia, Andersen, Burgis, Glover NOES: Mitchoff June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 60 2.Remove clause pertaining to declaring a non-conforming use for businesses AYES: Gioia, Andersen, Burgis, Mitchoff, Glover m. Prohibit new tobacco retailers from locating within 500 feet other tobacco retailers AYES: Gioia, Andersen, Burgis, Mitchoff, Glover n. Prohibit new “Significant Tobacco Retailers” (one who primarily sells tobacco products) AYES: Gioia, Andersen, Burgis, Glover NOES: Mitchoff The Supervisors expressed some concerns about the consistencies of prohibitions to be enacted at 500 feet, 1000 feet or unincorporated-area wide. Staff will provide the Board with map data of what these distances portray for clarity. Staff will contact by letter, pharmacies and the retailers that contain pharmacy space in their businesses, in the unincorporated area to notify them of the proposed ban on pharmacies selling tobacco products. The Board Closed the hearing. Staff will return to the Board on July 11, 2017 with the additional information and amended language for the ordinances. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Staff Report on Clarifications Requested by the Family and Human Services Committee F&HS April 24, 2017 Report and Attachments Ordinance No. 2017-01 Redline Ordinance No. 2017-01 Tobacco Product & Retail Sales Control Ordinance No. 2017-10 Tobacco Retailing Businesses MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Correspondence Received Correspondence Received 2 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 61 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 62 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 63 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 64 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 65 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 66 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 67 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 68 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 69 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 70 RECOMMENDATION(S): ACCEPT the Health Services Department, Public Health Division, staff report on policy options to protect youth from tobacco influences in the retail environment. DETERMINE which policy options, as recommended in Attachment II, to include in an ordinance regulating tobacco retailers. DIRECT Public Health staff to work with the County Counsel’s Office to draft the ordinance and present it to the Board of Supervisors for the Board’s consideration and present to the Planning Commission, if applicable. FISCAL IMPACT: Should the Board direct the development of a revised ordinance, minimal fiscal impacts associated with staff time costs, including County Counsel and other departments to develop the ordinance itself are expected. A portion of the Prop 99 funding Contra Costa Health Services receives for its Tobacco Prevention Program could be allocated to coordinating and implementing directions provided by the Board of Supervisors. Tobacco Retailer licensing fees, currently $287 per retailer, can also be used to conduct outreach, education and compliance inspections to tobacco retailers on the ordinance amendments and new requirements. These activities can be conducted with current funded staff. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 05/24/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS Contact: Dan Peddycord, 313-6712 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: May 24, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: , Deputy cc: T Scott, M Wilhelm, Tracey Rattray D.3 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:May 24, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Accept Staff Report on Policy Options for Protecting Youth from Tobacco Influences in the Retail Environment June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 71 BACKGROUND: On July 21, 2015, the Board of Supervisors accepted a Health Services Report on Policy Options to Protect Youth from Tobacco Influences in the Retail Environment, which was forwarded from the Family and Human Services Committee for discussion. The report highlighted how the tobacco retail environment influences youth smoking behavior and described a range of fifteen optional policy provisions that would serve to strengthen the County’s ordinance to protect youth from tobacco influences and to help prevent youth from initiating tobacco use. Recommendations were made for which policy options were among the most impactful in reducing youth tobacco influences in the retail environment. The report also referenced the results from the 2013 Healthy Stores for a Healthy Community Store Survey, which was accepted by the he Board at the May 5, 2015 Board of Supervisors meeting. Based on the recommendations from the Family and Human Services Committee and the subsequent acceptance of the recommendation by the Board of Supervisors on July 21, 2015, the Board directed staff to work with the affected County Departments to evaluate these options as modifications to the County’s existing ordinances, and to address fiscal and implementation considerations. Public Health staff met with staff from County Counsel and the Department of Conservation and Development to review all of the options discussed with the Board at the July 21, 2015 meeting. This report provides the requested information as well as policy options deemed to be the most effective to protect youth from tobacco influences in the retail environment, including strengthening the County’s Tobacco Retailer Licensing Ordinance. Since 90% of smokers begin smoking by the age of 18, tobacco use has been determined to be “fundamentally a pediatric disease” by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA). In order to protect health and public safety, Health Services has presented the following policy options for consideration as modifications to existing county code to address youth tobacco influences in the retail environment: Most Impactful Provisions to Reduce Youth Tobacco Influences in the Community a) Revise the definition of “tobacco products” in the Tobacco Retailer License Ordinance to be inclusive of newer electronic smoking devices and “liquids” that currently fall outside of the definition. b) Prohibit the sale of flavored (non-cigarette) tobacco products c) Prohibit the sale of menthol flavored cigarettes at least within 500 feet of schools d) Require a minimum pack size of ten (10) for little cigars and cigarillos. e) Prohibit new tobacco retailers from operating within 1000 feet of schools, parks, playgrounds and libraries f) Prohibit new tobacco retailers from operating within 500 feet of new or existing tobacco retailers. g) Prohibit the sale of tobacco products in pharmacies Condition of License Suspension if a Violation of the Law Occurs h) Require tobacco retailers who have their license suspended to remove tobacco advertising during license suspension periods i) Expand the time period reviewed for prior violations of the license (the “look-back” period) from 24 months (2 years) to 60 months (5 years) when considering the length of a license suspension for retailers found to be in violation of the law. Other Policy Considerations: j) Prohibit new “Significant Tobacco Retailers”, including “vape” shops, hookah bars or smoke shops k) Require tobacco retailers to comply with state and local storefront signage laws l) Require tobacco retailers to comply with drug paraphernalia sales laws m) Require tobacco retailers to check ID of customers who appear younger than 27 n) Limit or “cap” the number of retailers that can sell tobacco products at current number of licenses issued by the County o) Prepare a board order at a later date to adjust Tobacco Retailer Licensing fees to better capture and recover updated and real costs associated with education, enforcement and monitoring of implementing the ordinance. The summary table on Policy Options for Addressing Youth Tobacco Influences in the Retail Environment (Attachment II) has been updated to reflect CA jurisdictions that have adopted similar provisions in the interim period since our last report. Those provisions that were recommended by the department as the most impactful are in shaded boxes. Regulation of menthol cigarettes has been included since the last report among those that are most impactful, since being upheld in the courts. The option to raise Tobacco Retailer Licensing Fees to fully June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 72 cover law enforcement costs through licensing fees has been modified as County Counsel reports that it was not allowable as proposed. Each provision found in Attachment II, as well as fiscal and implementation issues, are discussed in more detail in Attachment I, Health Services Report on Policy Options and Recommendation for Addressing Youth Tobacco Influences in the Retail Environment. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this Action is not approved, the public's health may not be protected to the extent possible. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: Tobacco products are still being promoted to children through availability of youth-friendly flavored tobacco products and inexpensive small packs of these products; exposure to tobacco marketing in the retail environment; and the sale and marketing of tobacco products near schools and other youth sensitive areas. Policy options exist to amend County Code to address these issues and will discourage youth from tobacco use and promote healthier communities. ATTACHMENTS Attachment I Attachment II Attachment III Attachment IV Attachment V powerpoint June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 73 ∎ Contra Costa Community Substance Abuse Services ∎ Contra Costa Emergency Medical Services ∎ Contra Costa Environmental Health ∎ Contra Costa Health Plan ∎ ∎ Contra Costa Hazardous Materials Programs ∎ Contra Costa Mental Health ∎ Contra Costa Public Health ∎ Contra Costa Regional Medical Center ∎ Contra Costa Health Centers ∎ Daniel Peddycord ATTACHMENT I WILLIAM B. WALKER, M.D. HEALTH SERVICES DIRECTOR DANIEL PEDDYCORD, RN, MPA DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC HEALTH C ONTRA C OSTA P UBLIC H EALTH 597 CENTER AVENUE, SUITE 125 MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA 94553 PH (925) 313-6808 FAX (925) 313-6840 To: Contra Costa Board of Supervisors From: Daniel Peddycord, RN, MPA, Public Health Director, Contra Costa Health Services Re: Policy Options and Recommendations to Protect Youth from Tobacco Influences in the Retail Environment Date: May 24, 2016 I. Background On July 21, 2015, the Board of Supervisors accepted a Health Services Report on Policy Options to Protect Youth from Tobacco Influences in the Retail Environment, which was forwarded from the Family and Human Services Committee for discussion. The report highlighted how the tobacco retail environment influences youth smoking behavior and described a range of fifteen optional policy provisions that would serve to strengthen the County’s ordinance to protect youth from tobacco influences and to help prevent youth from initiating tobacco use. Recommendations were made for which policy options were among the most impactful in reducing youth tobacco influences in the retail environment. The report also referenced the results from the 2013 Healthy Stores for a Healthy Community Store Survey, which was accepted by the he Board at the May 5, 2015 Board of Supervisors meeting. Based on the recommendations from the Family and Human Services Committee and the subsequent acceptance of the recommendation by the Board of Supervisors on July 21, 2015, the Board directed staff to work with the affected County Departments to evaluate these options as modifications to the County’s existing ordinances, and to address fiscal and implementation considerations. Public Health staff met with staff from County Counsel and the Department of Conservation and Development to review all of the options discussed with the Board at the July 21, 2015 meeting. This report provides the requested information as well as policy options deemed to be the most effective to protect youth from tobacco influences in the retail environment, including strengthening the County’s Tobacco Retailer Licensing Ordinance. Since 90% of smokers begin smoking by the age of 18, tobacco use has been determined to be “fundamentally a pediatric disease” by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA).1 In order to protect health and public safety, Health Services has presented the following policy options for consideration as modifications to existing county code to address youth tobacco influences in the retail environment: Most Impactful Provisions to Reduce Youth Tobacco Influences in the Community a) Revise the definition of “tobacco products” in the Tobacco Retailer License Ordinance to be inclusive of newer electronic smoking devices and “liquids” that currently fall outside of the definition. b) Prohibit the sale of flavored (non-cigarette) tobacco products c) Prohibit the sale of menthol flavored cigarettes at least within 500 feet of schools d) Require a minimum pack size of ten (10) for little cigars and cigarillos. e) Prohibit new tobacco retailers from operating within 1000 feet of schools, parks, playgrounds and libraries 1 Hilts, Philip J. “FDA Head Calls Smoking a Pediatric Disease.” The New York Times 9 Mar 1995. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 74 2 f) Prohibit new tobacco retailers from operating within 500 feet of new or existing tobacco retailers. g) Prohibit the sale of tobacco products in pharmacies Condition of License Suspension if a Violation of the Law Occurs h) Require tobacco retailers who have their license suspended to remove tobacco advertising during license suspension periods i) Expand the time period reviewed for prior violations of the license (the “look-back” period) from 24 months (2 years) to 60 months (5 years) when considering the length of a license suspension for retailers found to be in violation of the law. Other Policy Considerations: j) Prohibit new “Significant Tobacco Retailers”, including “vape” shops, hookah bars or smoke shops k) Require tobacco retailers to comply with state and local storefront signage laws l) Require tobacco retailers to comply with drug paraphernalia sales laws m) Require tobacco retailers to check ID of customers who appear younger than 27 n) Limit or “cap” the number of retailers that can sell tobacco products at current number of licenses issued by the County o) Prepare a board order at a later date to adjust Tobacco Retailer Licensing fees to better capture and recover updated and real costs associated with education, enforcement and monitoring of implementing the ordinance. The summary table on Policy Options for Addressing Youth Tobacco Influences in the Retail Environment (Attachment II) has been updated to reflect CA jurisdictions that have adopted similar provisions in the interim period since our last report. Those provisions that were recommended by the department as the most impactful are in shaded boxes. Regulation of menthol cigarettes has been included since the last report among those that are most impactful, since being upheld in the courts. The option to raise Tobacco Retailer Licensing Fees to fully cover law enforcement costs through licensing fees has been deleted as County Counsel reports that it is not allowable under the law. Each provision found in Attachment I, as well as fiscal and implementation issues, are discussed in more detail in this report. II. Contra Costa County and Tobacco Prevention Efforts Contra Costa County has been a leader in protecting the health of its residents, workers and visitors, and youth in particular, from the devastating consequences caused by tobacco use and secondhand smoke exposure. In 2003, the Board adopted what was then a model Tobacco Retailer Licensing Ordinance to address illegal sales of tobacco to minors, requiring all tobacco retailers to purchase a local license in order to sell tobacco products, and allowing for a suspension of the license if tobacco sales laws, such as the no sales to minors law, were violated. In 2006, the Board adopted what was one of the strongest and most comprehensive secondhand smoke protections ordinances at the time, prohibiting smoking in many outdoor areas and in certain areas of multi-unit housing properties. Most recently in 2013 the Board amended the code to require a tobacco retailer license to sell electronic cigarettes and to prohibit the use of these devices where smoking is prohibited. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 75 3 While we have made good progress in Contra Costa in reducing adult and youth tobacco use2, 3, 4, youth are still exposed to tobacco industry influences in their communities. The Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids, in their fact sheet on Key State Specific Tobacco-Related Data and Rankings, reports that 16,800 youth begin smoking in CA every year5 and 3.9 million Californians still smoke6. In 2011, the tobacco industry spent $605 million7 advertising and promoting tobacco products in California, with 90% of its marketing budget spent in the retail store environment.8 Exposure to tobacco marketing in stores increases tobacco experimentation and use by youth9 and has been shown to be more powerful than peer pressure.10 Research also shows that the number of stores selling tobacco in a community can lead to higher rates of youth smoking. In addition to advertising and marketing influences, some Contra Costa cities have illegal tobacco sales rates to youth that are as high as 26%.11 III. The Problem of Youth Tobacco Use and the Retail Environment In summer, 2013, in order to get a picture of what tobacco industry influences look like in Contra Costa, Public Health’s Tobacco Prevention Project participated in a county-wide tobacco survey. Over 300 stores that sell tobacco throughout the county were part of the randomized sample for the Contra Costa Store Survey, including convenience, supermarket, liquor, tobacco, small market, discount, drug and big box stores. Stores that prohibited youth from entry or that require membership were excluded from the survey. Photos of these products can be found in the accompanying powerpoint. The Contra Costa Store Survey12 findings confirmed that tobacco is still being promoted to youth and that:  Over 80% of stores near schools in Contra Costa sell flavored (non-cigarette) tobacco products like “watermelon” and “tropical blast” flavored cigarillos and little cigars. Many of these products sell for under a dollar, making them very attractive and affordable for youth.  Over eight in 10 stores sell packs of 5 or less of cigarillos/little cigars, and close to 70% of stores sell these products as "singles". These products are also available very cheaply, making them affordable for youth. Eighty-five percent of tobacco retailers sell the most popular brand of cigarillos for under $1. 2 Gilpin EA, Emery SL, Farkas AJ, Distefan JM, White MM, Pierce JP. The California Tobacco Control Program: A Decade of Progress, Results from the California Tobacco Surveys, 1990-1998. La Jolla, CA: University of California, San Diego; 2001. 3 Max W, Rice DP, Zhang X, Sung H-Y, Miller L. The Cost of Smoking in California, 1999, Sacramento, CA: California Department of Health Services, 2002. 4 Max W, Sung H-Y, Shi Y, & Stark B. The Cost of Smoking in California, 2009. San Francisco, CA: Institute for Health & Aging, University of California, San Francisco, 2014. 5 Based on the 2011 Federal Trade Commission Report and California state estimate methodology used by Campaign For Tobacco Free Kids: http://www.tobaccofreekids.org/facts_issues/toll_us/california. 6 Max W, Sung H-Y, Shi Y, & Stark B. The Cost of Smoking in California, 2009. San Francisco, CA: Institute for Health & Aging, University of California, San Francisco, 2014. 7 Based on the 2011 Federal Trade Commission Report and California state estimate methodology used by Campaign For Tobacco Free Kids: http://www.tobaccofreekids.org/facts_issues/toll_us/california 8 U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC), Cigarette Report for 2007 and 2008, 2011, http://www.ftc.gov/os/2011/07/110729cigarettereport.pdf. FTC, Smokeless Tobacco Report for 2007 and 2008, 2011, http://www.ftc.gov/os/2011/07/110729smokelesstobaccoreport.pdf. Data for top 6 manufacturers only. 9 DiFranza, J.R., Wellman, R.J., Sargent, J.D., Weitzman, M., Hipple, B.J., Winickoff, J.P., Tobacco promotion and the initiation of tobacco use: assessing the evidence for causality. Pediatrics, 2006. 117(6): p. e1237-1248. http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/117/6/e1237.abstract%20(25 and National Cancer Institute, The Role of the Media in Promoting and Reducing Tobacco Use: TobaccoControl Monograph No. 19, 2008, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health: Bethesda, MD. http://cancercontrol.cancer.gov/brp/tcrb/monographs/19/index.html 10 Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids. Toll of Tobacco in the United States of America. 2011. http://www.tobaccofreekids.org/research/factsheets/pdf/0072.pdf. 11 California Department of Public Health, Food and Drug Branch, youth decoy operation results 2009. 12 2013 Healthy Stores for a Healthy Community (HSHC) Survey, California Department of Public Health. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 76 4  Close to half of all stores that sell tobacco in Contra Costa sell e-cigarettes. The number of stores that are selling e-cigarettes statewide has quadrupled, from just over 10% in 2011 to over 45% in 2013. Electronic cigarette use among middle and high school youth tripled between 2013 and 201413. Many of these products are attractive to youth because they are relatively cheap and come in flavors like cherry-limeade and mint.  Seven in 10 stores in Contra Costa have exterior advertising for unhealthy products like tobacco, alcohol and sugary drinks. This compares with 1 in 10 stores with exterior advertising for healthy items including fruits, vegetables and non-fat/low-fat milk. Information on the location and density of stores selling tobacco across the county was also collected and mapped. This data revealed that:  34% of stores selling tobacco throughout the County are located within 1000 feet of a school. One-third of youth who buy tobacco purchase these products within 1000 feet of school.14 Every school day, youth are exposed to tobacco influences such as advertising and product promotions on their way to and from school. Many of the Contra Costa communities with high numbers of stores selling tobacco near schools are low-income. Low-income communities have high rates of smoking and tobacco-related diseases like heart disease, cancers and stroke. The 2013 Contra Costa Store Survey provides concrete, scientific evidence on how the tobacco industry continues to target youth and lower-income communities through the retail environment. IV. Policy Considerations to Reduce Youth Tobacco Influences The CA Department of Public Health Tobacco Control Program and the statewide Healthy Stores for a Healthy Community Campaign recommend several effective policies to consider in reducing youth tobacco influences in the community: a) Include Electronic Smoking Devices and other emerging products in the definition of “Tobacco Products”. In 2013, Contra Costa was among the first in the state to revise its existing definition of tobacco products to include electronic cigarettes, requiring retailers who sell these products to have a license in order to sell them, and prohibiting use where smoking of conventional tobacco products is prohibited. Since then, new products have emerged such as “vape pens”, electronic hookah, and refillable “mods” and “tanks” that fall outside of the current definition and continue to be unregulated and may or may not contain nicotine. These products are attractive to youth, mimic smoking, undermine community norms related to smoking, and serve as “starter products” to a lifetime of addiction15. As such, The Family and Human Services Committee directed staff to revise the definition of “Tobacco Products” at its April 15, 2015 Committee Meeting. b) Prohibit the sale of flavored (non-cigarette) tobacco products, such as candy, fruit and spice characterizing flavors in little cigars, hookah tobacco and dissolvable tobacco products, as well as in electronic smoking devices and vapor solutions for these devices. Under the federal Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act, it is illegal for manufacturers to make cigarettes that contain “characterizing flavors” other than that of tobacco. This includes flavors such as 13 Arrazola R, Singh T, Corey C, et al, Tobacco Use Among Middle and High School Students – United States, 2011-2014. MMWR. 4/17/2015; Vol. 64 (#14): pp 381-385. 14 Lipton R, Banerjee A, Levy D, Manzanilla N, Cochrane M., The spatial distribution of underage tobacco sales in Los Angeles. Subst Use Misuse. 2008;43(11):1594-614. 15 Ji-Yeun P., Dong-Chul S., and Hsien-Chang L.. E-Cigarette Use and Intention to Initiate or Quit Smoking Among US Youths. American Journal of Public Health: April 2016, Vol. 106, No. 4, pp. 672-678. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302994 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 77 5 strawberry, grape, orange, clove, cinnamon, pineapple, and vanilla, coconut, licorice, cocoa or chocolate. The Act was adopted in 2009 largely because these flavored products were attractive and marketed to youth and young adults,16,17,18,19 and younger smokers were more likely to have tried these products than older smokers.20 (Menthol flavoring in cigarettes was exempted and is discussed in more detail below.) Though there is a federal ban on flavored cigarettes (excluding menthol) flavored non-cigarette tobacco products are not prohibited under federal law. They have become increasingly common and are available in a variety of flavors that appeal to children and young adults.21 The U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the U.S. Surgeon General have stated that flavored tobacco products are considered to be “starter” products for youth and help establish smoking habits that can lead to long- term addiction.22 Adding flavorings to tobacco products such as little cigars, cigarillos, and smokeless tobacco can mask the natural harshness and taste of tobacco, making these products easier to use and increasing their appeal among youth.23 The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has reported that electronic cigarette use among middle and high school students tripled between 2013 and 2014.24 Nicotine solutions, which are consumed via electronic smoking devices such as electronic cigarettes, are sold in dozens of flavors that appeal to youth, such as cotton candy and bubble gum.25 The California Attorney General has stated that electronic cigarette companies have targeted minors with fruit-flavored products.26 16 Carpenter CM, Wayne GF, Pauly JL, et al. 2005. “New Cigarette Brands with Flavors that Appeal to Youth: Tobacco Marketing Strategies.” Health Affairs. 24(6): 1601–1610; 17 Lewis M and Wackowski O. 2006. “Dealing with an Innovative Industry: A Look at Flavored Cigarettes Promoted by Mainstream Brands.” American Journal of Public Health. 96(2): 244–251. 18 Connolly GN. 2004. “Sweet and Spicy Flavours: New Brands for Minorities and Youth.” Tobacco Control. 13(3): 211–212. 19 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2012. Preventing Tobacco Use Among Youth and Young Adults: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta: U.S. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health, p. 537, www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/reports/preventing-youth-tobacco-use/full-report.pdf. 20 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2012. Preventing Tobacco Use Among Youth and Young Adults: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta: U.S. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health, p. 539, www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/reports/preventing-youth-tobacco-use/full-report.pdf. 21 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2012. Preventing Tobacco Use Among Youth and Young Adults: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta: U.S. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health, p. 164, 205, www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/reports/preventing-youth-tobacco-use/full-report.pdf; Morris DS and Fiala SC. 2013. “Flavoured, Non-cigarette Tobacco for Sale in the USA: An Inventory Analysis of Internet Retailer s.” Tobacco Control. [Electronic publication ahead of print], http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/early/2013/08/08/tobaccocontrol-2013-051059.full. 22 Food and Drug Administration. 2011. Fact Sheet: Flavored Tobacco Products, www.fda.gov/downloads/TobaccoProducts/ProtectingKidsfromTobacco/FlavoredTobacco/UCM183214.pdf; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2012. Preventing Tobacco Use Among Youth and Young Adults: A Report of the Surgeon General . Atlanta: U.S. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health, p. 539, www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/reports/preventing-youth-tobacco-use/full-report.pdf. 23 King BA, Dube SR, and Tynan MA. 2013. “Flavored Cigar Smoking Among U.S. Adults: Findings from the 2009–2010 National Adult Tobacco Survey.” Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 15(2): 608–614; Nelson DE, Mowery P, Tomar S, et al. 2006. “Trends in Smokeless Tobacco Use Among Adults and Adolescents in the United States.” American Journal of Public Health. 96(5): 897–905. 24 Arrazola R, Singh T, Corey C, et al, Tobacco Use Among Middle and High School Students – United States, 2011-2014. MMWR. 4/17/2015; Vol. 64 (#14): pp 381-385. 25 Cameron JM, Howell DN, White JR, et al. 2013. “Variable and Potentially Fatal Amounts of Nicotine in E-cigarette Nicotine Solutions.” Tobacco Control. [Electronic publication ahead of print], http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/early/2013/02/12/tobaccocontrol-2012-050604.full; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2012. Preventing Tobacco Use Among Youth and Young Adults: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta: U.S. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health, p. 549, www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/reports/preventing-youth-tobacco-use/full-report.pdf. 26 Press Release, State of California Department of Justice, Office of the Attorney General, Brown Announces Electronic Cigarett e June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 78 6 Jurisdictions have the authority to prohibit the sale of these products in the entire jurisdiction, and in the interest of public health and to protect youth from these products, the Department recommends that any flavored tobacco product regulations apply to the entire unincorporated area. In the Bay Area, El Cerrito and Santa Clara County have adopted laws to restrict the sale of flavored (non- cigarette) tobacco products throughout the entire jurisdiction, and Yolo County is currently considering such regulations. Federal district courts outside of California have upheld similar bans, and the cities of New York, Providence, Rhode Island and Manhattan Beach, CA also prohibit the sale of these products throughout the entire city. c) Prohibit the sale of menthol flavored cigarettes within 500 feet of schools. In a Resolution signed on October 26, 2010, the Contra Costa Board of Supervisors urged the Food and Drug Administration to ban menthol in cigarettes and in other tobacco products, stating the Board’s “commitment to the health and well-being of its residents and particular concern about preventing tobacco use among youth and in reducing health disparities.” Due to intense lobbying from the tobacco industry, menthol flavored cigarettes were excluded from the federal ban on flavored cigarettes, even though a 2006 study published in the Journal of Nicotine and Tobacco Research showed that 50% of youth start smoking with menthol flavored cigarettes, and that these are “starter” cigarettes for many youth to go on to become regular smokers. Youth who smoke menthol cigarettes are significantly more likely to show signs of nicotine addiction than their peers who smoke non- menthol brands.27 The tobacco industry has also targeted African Americans with mentholated tobacco products and as a result nearly 83% of African American smokers smoke menthol, compared with 24% of White smokers28,29,30. The City of Chicago and the City of Berkeley are the two jurisdictions in the country that have adopted ordinances that prohibit the sale of menthol flavored cigarettes within a certain distance of schools (Chicago within 500 feet and Berkeley within 600 feet.) A federal district court has upheld Chicago’s ordinance. Berkeley’s ordinance has not been challenged. Should the Board wish to prohibit the sale of menthol flavored cigarettes in the unincorporated County, it would be the first County to do so in the nation. County counsel reports that the county’s police power appears to authorize the County to prohibit the sale of menthol cigarettes in the entire unincorporated County, or to regulate the sale of these products within a certain distance of schools, following similar actions taken by Chicago and Berkeley. Currently, there are a total of 93 licensed tobacco retailers in the unincorporated county, and nineteen of these stores lay within 500 feet of a school. The table on Stores Selling Tobacco in Contra Costa, 2015 (Attachment III) provides information on the number of stores selling tobacco products that are within 500 feet of schools for each of the unincorporated communities. d) Require a 10/pack minimum pack size for sale of cigars, including cigarillos and little cigars. Small packages of tobacco products make these products more affordable and therefore more Maker's Agreement to Stop Deceptive Marketing and Sales to Minors (Aug. 3, 2010), oag.ca.gov/news/press-releases/brown-announces- electronic-cigarette-makers-agreement-stop-deceptive-marketing. 27 Hersey JC, Ng SW, Nonnemaker JM, et al. Are menthol cigarettes a starter product for youth? Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 2006;8:403-413. 28 Moolchan E. Adolescent menthol smokers: Will they be a harder target for cessation? Nicotine Tob Res (2004) 6(Suppl 1): S93-S95 doi:10.1080/14622203310001649522. 29 The National African American Tobacco Prevention Network. Blacks and Menthol Fact Sheet. http://naatpn.org/resources/Blacks%20&%20Menthol.pdf. Accessed September 1, 2010. 30 Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Office of Applied Studies. The NSDUH Report: Use of Menthol Cigarettes. Rockville, MD. November 19, 2009. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 79 7 accessible to youth. Youth are generally price-sensitive to the purchase of tobacco products. Although federal and state law ban the sale of individual cigarettes, neither restrict the sale of individual little cigars, cigarillos and cigars. These products are typically sold individually, making them more affordable and appealing to youth.31 Health Services recommends exempting premium cigars (those that retail for $5 or more each) from a minimum pack size ordinance. The cities of El Cerrito, Hayward, Huntington Park and Sonoma currently require a minimum pack size of 5/pack, however since cigarillos and little cigars currently sell for as low as “3 for 99 cents”, a 10/pack minimum pack size may be a consideration if the Board decides to adopt this provision. e) Prohibit any new tobacco retailers to be located within 1000 feet of schools, parks, playgrounds, and libraries. Research has demonstrated that youth are more likely to experiment with tobacco products when retailers are located near schools, and that the number of tobacco retailers in a community affects youth smoking behaviors.32 The density of tobacco retailers, particularly in neighborhoods surrounding schools, has been associated with increased youth smoking rates.33 Restricting the location of all tobacco retailers near schools and other youth sensitive areas, as well as within a certain distance to each other, creates tobacco-free zones and reduces tobacco influences in the community. Twenty-five California cities and counties have adopted similar laws, including El Cerrito, Santa Clara County and Union City. Other youth sensitive areas, such as youth centers, could be added to this provision. Maps illustrating a 1000 foot buffer around schools, parks, playgrounds and libraries were developed for one community in each of the Supervisorial districts (Attachment IV). District I: El Sobrante District II: Saranap District III: Byron and Discovery Bay* District IV: Contra Costa Centre District V: Bay Point *As requested at the 7/21/15 meeting, the two retailers selling tobacco products at the intersection of Byron Highway and Route 4 are approximately 3500 feet from Excelsior Middle School. The maps also illustrate boundary areas within 500 feet of existing retailers, which is discussed below as another policy option. f) Reduce the density of tobacco retailers by prohibiting the location of new tobacco retailers within 500 feet of existing tobacco retailers (density relative to other retailers). High density of tobacco retailers has been associated with increased smoking rates, particularly among youth.34 A study of California neighborhoods found that the density and proximity of tobacco retailers influence smoking behaviors, including number of cigarettes smoked per day.35 Of additional concern, widespread presence of tobacco in retail settings normalizes the use of tobacco products and triggers 31 California Department of Public Health. (2012). Tobacco in the Retail Environment, www.cdph.ca.gov/programs/tobacco/Documents/Tobacco%20Retail%20Environment%20Fact%20Sheet_Easy%20Print.pdf 32 McCarthy, W.J., Mistry, R., Lu, Y., Patel, M., Zheng, H., Dietsch, B., Density of tobacco retailers near schools: effects on tobacco use among students. American Journal of Public Health, 2009. 99(11): p. 2006 2013. 33 Henriksen L, Feighery EC, Schleicher NC, et al. 2008. “Is Adolescent Smoking Related to Density and Proximity of Tobacco Outlets and Retail Cigarette Advertising Near Schools?” Preventive Medicine 47: 210-214. 34 Henriksen L, Feighery EC, Schleicher NC, et al. 2008. “Is Adolescent Smoking Related to Density and Proximity of Tobacco Outlets and Retail Cigarette Advertising Near Schools?” Preventive Medicine 47: 210-214. 35 Chuang YC, Cubbin C, Ahn D, et al. 2005. “Effects of Neighbourhood Socioeconomic Status and Convenience Store Concentration on Individual Level Smoking.” Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 59: 568-573. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 80 8 smoking urges among former smokers and those attempting to quit.36 California law limits alcohol licenses based on density, and this policy applies that same rationale to tobacco retailers. Nine cities and counties in CA have adopted similar laws.37 g) Prohibit the sale of tobacco products in Pharmacies. A recent gallop poll showed Pharmacists are perceived by many as among the most trusted of health care professionals. Research indicates that by selling tobacco products, pharmacies reinforce positive social perceptions and send a message that it is not so dangerous to smoke38,39. Children and young people are particularly influenced by cues suggesting that smoking is acceptable. The American Pharmacists Association, the California Pharmacists Association, and the California Medical Association have called for state and local laws prohibiting tobacco sales in drugstores and pharmacies because doing so supports the public health and social welfare of the communities in which they practice. In the Bay Area, Richmond, San Francisco, Berkeley, Marin County, Daly City and Santa Clara County prohibit the sale of tobacco products in all pharmacies. A federal district court has upheld San Francisco’s ordinance prohibiting the sale of tobacco products in pharmacies. Of the nine (9) licensed pharmacies in the unincorporated county, there are currently six (6) that currently sell tobacco products. Conditions of License Suspension if violation of the law occurs h) Amend the County’s Tobacco Retailer Licensing Ordinance to require retailers to remove tobacco advertising during the license suspension period. Over 60 jurisdictions, including Richmond, Albany, Oakland, Pacifica, and Santa Clara County, require this provision during license suspension period, when sales of tobacco products are prohibited, and it is now considered a best practice provision to further support prevention of tobacco sales to minors. The adoption of the Tobacco Retailer Licensing program has proved to be a very effective means of reducing illegal sales of tobacco to minors. Sales in the unincorporated area of the County decreased from 37% to 7% within the first year of enforcement. i) Amend the County’s Tobacco Retailer Licensing Ordinance to expand the time period reviewed for prior violations of the license from 24 months (2 years) to 60 months (5 years) when considering the length of the license suspension. Nearly 70 other CA jurisdictions include this provision, as it serves as a strong incentive for retailers to fully comply with tobacco control laws over time. Other Policy Considerations j) Prohibit new “Significant Tobacco Retailers”, businesses that primarily sell tobacco products, (defined by a certain percentage of gross revenue or floor space dedicated to tobacco products) including hookah lounges, vape shops and tobacco shops, from obtaining a tobacco retailer license. Over 8 percent of all tobacco retailers statewide were witnessed unlawfully selling to minors in 2012, and tobacco stores (defined as businesses in which at least 80 percent of merchandise was tobacco products) 36 McDaniel PA and Malone RE. 2011. “Why California Retailers Stop Selling Tobacco Produ cts, and What Their Customers and Employees Think About It When They Do.” BMC Public Health 11: 848. 37 “Matrix of Local Ordinances Restricting Tobacco Retailers Near Schools, July 2013”, Center for Tobacco Policy and Organizing. 38 Katz MH. 2008. “Banning Tobacco Sales in Pharmacies: The Right Prescription.” Journal of the American Medical Association, 300(12):1451-1453. 39 Hudmon KS, Fenlon CM, and Corelli RL. 2006. “Tobacco Sales in Pharmacies: Time to Quit.” Tobacco Control, 15(1): 35 -38. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 81 9 sold to minors at a much higher rate than the statewide average, as high as 20.5 percent.40 In the Bay Area, El Cerrito and Richmond prohibit new significant tobacco retailers; Pittsburg has imposed a moratorium on new “smoke shops” or “smoking lounges”; Antioch prohibits new significant tobacco retailers from certain locations; and Concord prohibits new hookah shops. k) Require compliance with local and state laws regarding storefront signage. This provision allows for suspension of a retailer’s license if a retailer violates the state or local law setting a maximum percentage of window space that can be covered by signs at retail establishments. Maximum allowable signage laws have been enacted as a safety measure, as they may allow for law enforcement to view into an establishment. This provision provides another mechanism for communities to bring retailers into compliance with existing health and safety laws. Santa Clara County has a similar provision. l) Making violations of state laws regarding drug paraphernalia or controlled substances a violation of a tobacco retailer license. Many cigarette, tobacco, and other shops sell items that are commonly known to be drug paraphernalia, including bongs and pipes used to smoke methamphetamine and other illicit drugs, and claim that such items are intended for tobacco use. If adopted, drug paraphernalia would be defined as it is in state law. m) Require tobacco retailers to check ID of customers who appear younger than 27. Current law requires tobacco retailers and their employees to check the age of purchasers up to the age of 18, the legal age for tobacco product sales. Clerks and/or store owners who sell to minors sometimes appeal a citation based on a claim that the customer “looked like” they were 18 or older. This claim would not be allowable if this provision is adopted. n) Cap the number of Tobacco Retailer Licenses issued at the current number of issued licenses. In 2003 when the County’s Tobacco Retailer Licensing Ordinance was first instituted, there were 107 tobacco retailers in the unincorporated County. The number of retailers selling tobacco has gradually decreased to 92 licensed tobacco retailers in 2015, with an average of 1-2 new retailers applying for licenses annually. In the Bay Area, the city of Sonoma recently adopted a law that restricts new tobacco retailers to the 15 existing licensed tobacco retailer locations. San Francisco has adopted an ordinance which caps the total number of tobacco retailers at the current level for each of the supervisorial districts. V. Fiscal Impacts. Minimum fiscal impacts to the County are expected. Should the Board direct development of a revised ordinance there will be cost in staff time, including County Counsel and other county departments to develop the ordinance itself. A portion of the Prop 99 funding Contra Costa Health Services receives for its Tobacco Prevention Program could be allocated to coordinating and implementing directions provided by the Board of Supervisors. Tobacco Retailer licensing fees, currently $287 per retailer, can also be used to conduct outreach and education to tobacco retailers on the ordinance amendments and new requirements. These activities can be conducted with current funded staff. The July 21, 2015 report to the Board included the option to increase the Tobacco Retailer License Fee to fully cover the cost of enforcement and monitoring of all tobacco control laws, including youth decoy 40 Chapman R. 2012. State Health Officer’s Report on Tobacco Use and Promotion in California. California Department of Public Health, California Tobacco Control Program, p. 8, www.cdph.ca.gov/Documents/EMBARGOED%20State%20Health%20Officers%20Report%20on%20Tobacco.pdf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 82 10 operations. The current Tobacco Retailer License fee reflects costs related to administration of the license and site compliance checks. It does not cover the cost of youth decoy operations through the Sheriff’s Office for enforcement of the “no sales to minors” law, which are funded at approximately $18,000 annually with County general funds. County Counsel reports that fees may be charged to recover reasonable regulatory and administrative costs for issuing licenses and performing inspections. Fees may not be charged for general governmental services, including law enforcement services. Given that multiple jurisdictions are funding enforcement efforts through tobacco retailer licensing fees, the Department recommends that a Board Order be presented at a later date adjusting the fee to better capture and recover updated and real costs. Location and density policy options under consideration restrict new tobacco retail establishments only from locating within a certain distance of schools and other youth sensitive areas and of each other. If location restrictions are adopted, (prohibiting new tobacco retailers to be located within 1000 feet of schools, parks, playgrounds, and libraries; prohibiting new tobacco retailers to be located within 500 feet of an existing tobacco retailer; and/or prohibiting the sale of menthol cigarettes within a certain distance of schools) County Counsel has recommended that these provisions be included in the County’s Zoning Code. As such, the County’s Department of Conservation and Development will be included in the process of reviewing and approving new tobacco retailers in the County. If any of the location restrictions are adopted, the applicant would need to first get approval through the Department of Conservation and Development, which will also apply an administration fee to the applicant. Retailer Industry Concerns. Staff were directed to respond to concerns expressed in a letter dated July 16, 2015 to the Board from representatives of the tobacco retail industry, most specifically the American Petroleum and Convenience Store Association (APCA), indicating their concerns over the financial impact of placing restrictions on flavored tobacco products and prohibiting the sale of tobacco products within 1000 feet of youth sensitive areas. Their correspondence cites that, on average, 30% of annual sales come from tobacco. The density and location policy options discussed in this report apply to new retailers only, which appears to address this concern from this retail association. However, there may be associated financial impacts on some retailers, especially on small businesses that rely primarily on sale of flavored non-cigarette tobacco products throughout the county, and possibly for those selling menthol cigarettes within 500 feet of schools This is balanced against the significant medical cost and human toll that tobacco related disease continues to exact on counties and their corresponding communities, which have resulted in over $334 million annually in excess healthcare costs in our county alone41. Some tobacco retailer associations also point to adults buying flavored products and small pack sizes. This may be true in some cases, however it is also true that these products target youth in Contra Costa communities. While the tobacco industry is prohibited from directly marketing and advertising to young people by the 1998 Master Settlement Agreement, brightly packaged, flavored tobacco products are a way to indirectly appeal and attract youth tobacco and e-cigarette users. Prohibiting flavored cigars and requiring minimum pack size will reduce tobacco use by creating an environment that has fewer tobacco influences and supports a tobacco-free community. Resources are available to assist small businesses in revising their business plans in order to comply with any new regulations, and County staff will continue to identify additional resources to support small businesses in this transition. (Attachment V) 41 Max W, Sung H-Y, Shi Y, & Stark B. The Cost of Smoking in California, 2009. San Francisco, CA: Institute for Health & Aging, University of California, San Francisco, 2014. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 83 11 VI. Implementing new tobacco prevention provisions If adopted, most of proposed new regulations for sales of tobacco products will be included in the current Tobacco Retailer Licensing Ordinance, which is administered and enforced through the County’s Public Health Division. An educational approach to compliance will be prioritized over the first year including a mailing to all affected tobacco retailers following final Board adoption of any new regulations, notifying retailers of the requirements under the new ordinance. The department recommends that most of the provisions go into effect within 30 days of adoption of an ordinance, with the exception of the provisions prohibiting the sale of flavored tobacco products, menthol cigarettes and small packs of cigars. A longer implementation period of 180 days for these provisions will allow retailers to sell off product that they currently stock, as well as develop any alternative business plans, if necessary to comply with new health and public safety regulations. Implementation, including outreach and education activities would be integrated into ongoing Tobacco Retailer Licensing implementation activities conducted by Tobacco Prevention Program staff. Specifically, implementation would include: --developing an educational materials for direct mailing to all existing licensed tobacco retailers, including information on resources available to address business planning to comply with the new regulations. --working with the affected County departments to develop operational protocols and to assure that any intersecting ordinances requirements are addressed in communications to the public. --work with the Business License Office to review new license applications for approval and to provide educational materials through the Business License Office application and renewal mechanisms to both current and new retailers. --updating and maintaining the Tobacco Prevention Program webpages with the new regulations and educational materials, as well as both State and County information on Tobacco Retailer Licensing and requirements. --conducting site inspections, education and follow-up with owners if stores are not compliant with the new regulations. -- promoting and responding to calls received on the Tobacco Violations Reporting Line--collaborating with the Sheriff’s Office to plan retailer compliance inspections. The Sheriff’s Office will continue to conduct youth decoy operations through an MOU with Health Services -- continuing to coordinate license suspension hearings for those retailers that have been found to be in violation of the law. Implementation of Tobacco Retailer Density and Location Restrictions. Public Health staff has met with County Counsel and Department of Conservation and Development staff to discuss options for implementation of the proposed tobacco retailer density and location restrictions. County Counsel reports that State law authorizes the county to establish density and location restrictions in its Zoning Code. Therefore, the Department of Conservation and Development will have a role in license approval through determining distance to schools, other youth sensitive areas, and to other retailers, if these provisions are adopted. However, Health Services staff has recommended that the density and location restrictions be reference in the amended Tobacco Retailer License Ordinance. The Public Health Department will maintain coordination of all aspects of the license approval process to assure that all tobacco related regulations are complied with prior to annual licensing of tobacco retailers and over the annual licensing period. Communication with the Cities. Members of the Board expressed interest in communications with the cities on these policies. The Public Health Department will make every effort to make a presentation to the June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 84 12 Mayors Conference on any new ordinance provisions that are adopted, and staff will provide information and technical assistance to those cities that are interested in protecting health and public safety through addressing youth tobacco influences in the retail environment. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 85 Policy Options for Addressing Youth Tobacco Influences in the Retail Environment Contra Costa Health Services, Public Health Division For Presentation to Contra Costa Board of Supervisors, May 24, 2016 Most Impactful Policies for Addressing Youth Tobacco Influences in the Retail Environment Provision Description CA Jurisdictions with Similar Protection a. Require a Tobacco Retailer License for all retailers selling traditional and/or emerging tobacco products. Revises definition of “Tobacco Product” to include all “emerging products” including all electronic smoking devices (whether or not they contain nicotine). Current definition fails to capture a number of vaping products that have emerged since the County tobacco retail ordinance was adopted. If adopted, the new definition would cover all electronic devices which mimic smoking or can be used to deliver a dose of nicotine or other substances, and all components, parts or accessory of a “tobacco product”. El Cerrito, Richmond, Albany, Oakland, San Jose and Santa Clara County for a total of close to 100 jurisdictions in CA. Family and Human Services Committee directed staff to develop updated definition for current ordinance at 4/13/15 Committee Meeting. b. Prohibit the sale of flavored (non- cigarette) tobacco products Prohibits the sale of flavored (non-cigarette) tobacco products within the entire unincorporated County. The Food and Drug Administration has banned candy, fruit and spice as characterizing flavors for cigarettes only. Other tobacco products (smokeless, little cigars, hookah tobacco, and dissolvable tobacco products) with these flavors are exempt from the federal ban. If adopted, the ban on flavored product would extend to these other non-cigarette tobacco products. El Cerrito, Berkeley, Santa Clara County, Hayward, Manhattan Beach and Sonoma (Also New York City; Providence Rhode Island, and Chicago.) Under consideration in Yolo County. c. Prohibit the sale of menthol flavored cigarettes near schools (added to “most effective” list since the 7/21/15 report based on recent court decision) Would prohibit the sale of menthol flavored cigarettes within a certain distance of a school. The Food and Drug Administration has exempted “menthol” flavor from its ban on “characterizing flavors” in cigarettes. Staff recommends a distance no less than 500 feet. If adopted, this provision would affect 19 tobacco retailers across the unincorporated county. Berkeley (within 600 feet of schools) Also Chicago (within 500 feet of schools) d. Require minimum pack size for cigars Although federal and state law ban the sale of individual cigarettes, neither restrict the sale of individual cigars, including cigarillos and little cigars. Options include requiring minimum pack size (current regulation for cigarettes is 20) for all cigars. Staff recommend a package size of 10. Could exempt premium cigars that cost $5 or more. El Cerrito, Hayward, Sonoma, Huntington Park, Gardena, Union City. e. Restrict location of new tobacco retailers near schools and other “youth-sensitive” areas such as parks, playgrounds and libraries. Prohibits a license to new tobacco retailers if located within a certain distance (e.g., 500-1500 feet) of a school or other area frequented by youth (e.g., playground, church, recreation center, park, etc.). Staff recommend a distance of 1000 feet, which is consistent with multiple jurisdictions. Near Schools and other Youth Sensitive Areas: El Cerrito, Antioch, Berkeley, Dublin, Union City, Vallejo, Albany, Oakland, Marin County, and San Rafael (plus 14 other jurisdictions). Near schools only: San Francisco, Santa Barbara County, Sacramento, Santa Clara County, Manhattan Beach, plus 5 other jurisdictions. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 86 f. Prohibit new tobacco retailers from locating within certain proximity of other retailers This density measure would restrict new tobacco retailers from locating within a certain distance (e.g., 500-1500 feet) of another new or existing tobacco retailer. Staff recommends 500 feet, which is consistent with multiple jurisdictions. El Cerrito, San Francisco, Santa Cruz, Hayward, Dublin, Santa Clara County, Union City, Vallejo, Fairfield, Saratoga, Rohnert Park, Temple City, Westminster, Selma, El Cahon g. Prohibit sale of tobacco products in pharmacies Prohibiting the sale of tobacco products in pharmacies is consistent with the public’s perception of pharmacies as a place to go for health-related service and advice. Of the 9 pharmacies in the unincorporated county, three have already made corporate decisions to not sell tobacco products (2 CVS stores and Park Rexall). Richmond, San Francisco, Santa Clara County, Berkeley, Healdsburg, Daly City, Hollister, Marin County Conditions of License Suspension if violation of law occurs: h. Remove tobacco advertising during license suspension Requires retailers to remove or cover all tobacco-related advertising, in addition to tobacco products, during the period that their tobacco retailer license is suspended. Would also apply to Electronic Smoking Devices and paraphernalia if definition of “tobacco products” is revised. Richmond, Concord, Albany, Oakland, Pacifica, Santa Clara plus 56 other jurisdictions i. Expand time period reviewed for prior violations of license Would expand time period reviewed for prior violations of license from 24 months (2 years) to 60 months (5 years) when considering length of license suspension. El Cerrito, Richmond, Albany, Oakland plus 64 other jurisdictions Other Policy Considerations: j. Prohibit new “Significant Tobacco Retailers” Prohibits a new “Significant Tobacco Retailer”—a business that primarily sells tobacco products—from obtaining a tobacco retailer license. Definition of “Significant Tobacco Retailer” is based on either amount of floor space or percentage of sales devoted to tobacco products. Would also apply to retailers selling Electronic Smoking Devices and paraphernalia if definition of “tobacco products” is revised, as recommended above. This provision would effectively prohibit any new ‘vape’ shops, hookah bars, or tobacco shops. El Cerrito; Huntington Park; Richmond; Carpinteria; Concord (no new hookah shops); Dublin (no vapor lounges or hookah bars); Hayward (no vapor lounges); Union City (no vapor lounges or hookah bars); and Pittsburg (moratorium on any new “smoke shops”) k. Require tobacco retailers to comply with storefront signage laws Allows for suspension of retailer’s license if a retailer violates the state law or local law setting a maximum percentage of window space that can be covered by signs at retail locations. These laws exist for safety purposes, as they provide for more visibility into stores for law enforcement. This would provide a means to bring retailers into compliance with health and safety laws. Santa Clara County l. Require tobacco retailers to comply with drug paraphernalia sales laws Makes violations of state laws regarding drug paraphernalia or controlled substances a violation of a tobacco retailer license. Definition of what constitutes drug paraphernalia would be as defined in state law. Oakland, Richmond, Union City plus 8 other cities and counties (Firebaugh, Grass Valley, Huntington Park, Montebello, Parlier, Riverbank, Santa Cruz County, and Watsonville) (as of June, 2012) June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 87 m. Require tobacco retailers to check ID of customers who appear younger than 27 Requires retailers to check the age of purchasers who appear to be under the age of 27. This measure helps insure that tobacco is not sold to youth and will become even more relevant should the State advance the legal age to purchase tobacco from 18 to 21 years of age. Concord, Richmond, Albany, Oakland, Santa Clara (age 30) plus 35 other jurisdictions n. Limit or “cap” the number of retailers that can sell tobacco products. This density measure, limits the total number of tobacco retailer licenses that are issued. At present time there are 92 tobacco retailers in the Unincorporated area of the county. The Cap recommended by staff is 92. Sonoma, Orville, Lynwood, Huntington Park, San Francisco o. Increase the Tobacco Retailer License Fee to fully cover the cost of education, enforcement and monitoring of any new provisions adopted by the County. The current Tobacco Retailer License was set at $287 in 2010. It reflected the cost at that time related to the administration of the license and some site compliance checks. Staff recommend that a separate board order be presented at a later date adjust the license fee to better capture and recover updated and real cost. Fees may be charged to recover reasonable regulatory and administrative costs for issuing licenses and performing inspections. Fees may not be charged for general governmental services, including law enforcement services. 98 of 110 jurisdictions in CA have Tobacco Retailer Licensing enforcement programs, including youth decoy operations, that are fully funded through tobacco retailer licensing fees (as of September, 2013). June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 88 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 89 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 90 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 91 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 92 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 93 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 94 ATTACHMENT V Prepared by Tobacco Prevention Project on 4.20.16 Resources for Small Business Owners in CC County The following resources are currently available to small business owners in Contra Costa County: Contra Costa County Small Business Development Center The Small Business Development Center (SBDC) offers free workshops and advising on a variety of business topics, including:  Adapting a business practice in response to new laws  Support in navigating licensing and permit issues  Accessing loans  Sales and marketing  Strategic planning  Identifying resources SBDC also provides personalized, one-on-one advising and access to experts in many fields that can help business adapt to changes in the business environment, such as laws restricting sales of certain tobacco products. Services are provided free of charge to all small business owners in Contra Costa County. Contra Costa SBDC is grant funded and assesses each business for eligibility before one-on-one services are offered. Tobacco retailers interested in the individualized advising services would be assessed for the potential to achieve economic impact (such as job retention) in the next 6-12 months, then a Scope of Work would be developed for individualized services. The expectation is that for every hour the Center invests in a project, the retailer will work approximately 5 hours. For example, the retailer should plan to spend 25 hours working on their goals (such as a business plan to diversify products sold) in exchange for five hours of individual consulting. The Contra Costa County SBDC advising services are available to small businesses, such as businesses with less 500 employees and less than $15M annual revenue. More information about applying for advising services with Contra Costa SBDC is available on their website: http://contracostasbdc.org/node/20289 “Professional guidance as you grow your business is critical to success. Our team of advisors is at your service to assist with the opportunities and issues related with growing your business. This service is free to all owners of existing businesses and entrepreneurs who are actively launching a business.” – SBDC Contact: Oscar Dominguez, Contra Costa SBDC Director Workforce Development Board of Contra Costa 300 Ellinwood Way, Suite 300 Pleasant Hill, California 94523 925-602-6810 odominguez@ehsd.cccounty.us June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 95 ATTACHMENT V Prepared by Tobacco Prevention Project on 4.20.16 Small Business Administration (SBA) https://www.sba.gov/ The SBA offers general and technical assistance to new and established businesses. Services include loan programs, business counseling, management training, conferences, referrals and reference libraries. Small Business Information Center: (800) 827-5722 national answer desk Email: answerdesk@sba.gov Service Corps of Retired Executives (SCORE) Retired business professionals volunteer to provide free counseling to individuals starting small businesses. Counseling and workshops are available at a cost. (510) 273-6611 http://eastbayscore.org/ Renaissance Entrepreneurship Center The Renaissance Entrepreneurship Center is a non-profit that works to increase the entrepreneurial capacities of individuals, and thereby strengthen communities through the creation of sustainable new businesses, new jobs, and the promotion of financial self-sufficiency. They offer classes, workshop and one on one consulting in Richmond. Their beginner class, “Start Smart” is a 4-week program (12 hours) and costs $120 with financially-based scholarships available. Their intermediate class, “Business Prep” is a nine-week program (27 hours) and costs $240 with financially-based scholarships available. They also offer workshops for advanced entrepreneurs (people who have launched their business) ranging from Quickbooks to e-commerce to social media marketing. Contact: Bret Alexander Sweet, Program Manager Renaissance Entrepreneurship Center - Richmond 1500 Macdonald Avenue, Richmond, CA 94801 510-221-2002 bsweet@rencenter.org www.rencenter.org June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 96 Policy Options for Addressing Youth Tobacco Influences in the Retail Environment Contra Costa Health Services, Public Health Division For Presentation to Contra Costa Board of Supervisors May 24, 2016 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 97 Vape penMechanical modsBox modE-cigarE-HookahsCigalikesE-cigarettes Mods/tanksVape pens Includes cigalikes, e- hookah, e-cigars and cartridges E-liquids Cartridges a. Require a Tobacco Retailer License for all retailers selling traditional and/or emerging tobacco products. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 98 b. Prohibit the sale of flavored (non-cigarette) tobacco products Candy or liquid nicotine? June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 99 c. Prohibit the sale of menthol flavored cigarettes near schools June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 100 d. Require minimum pack size for cigars June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 101 e. Restrict location of tobacco retailers near schools and other youth sensitive areas f. Prohibit new tobacco retailers from locating within certain proximity of other retailers June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 102 Insert map here June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 103 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 104 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 105 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 106 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 107 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 108 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 109 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 110 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 111 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 112 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 113 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 114 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 115 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 116 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 117 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 118 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 119 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 120 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 121 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 122 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 123 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 124 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 125 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 126 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 127 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 128 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 129 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 130 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 131 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 132 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 133 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 134 SUMMARY OF NEW PROVISONS UNDER THE CHANGES TO THE COUNTY’S SECONDHAND SMOKE AND TOBACCO PRODUCT CONTROL ORDINANCE and ZONING CODE AMENDMENTS Contra Costa Health Services, Public Health Division For Presentation to Family and Human Services Committee of the Contra Costa Board of Supervisors, April 24, 2017 Tobacco Product and Retail Sales Control Ordinance (Amendments to Division 445, Secondhand Smoke and Tobacco Product Control) Provision Description CA Jurisdictions with Similar Protection a. Require a Tobacco Retailer License for all retailers selling traditional and/or emerging tobacco products. Revises definition of “Tobacco Product” to include all “emerging products” including all electronic smoking devices (whether or not they contain nicotine). The new definition covers all electronic devices that can be used to deliver a dose of nicotine or other substances, and all components, parts or accessory of a “tobacco product”. El Cerrito, Richmond, Albany, Oakland, San Jose and Santa Clara County for a total of close to 100 jurisdictions in CA. b. Prohibit the sale of flavored (non- cigarette) tobacco products Prohibits the sale of flavored (non-cigarette) tobacco products within the entire unincorporated County. The Food and Drug Administration has banned candy, fruit and spice as characterizing flavors for cigarettes only. Other tobacco products (smokeless, little cigars, hookah tobacco, and dissolvable tobacco products) with these flavors are exempt from the federal ban. El Cerrito, Berkeley (within 600 feet of schools), Santa Clara County (except adult-only shops), Hayward, Manhattan Beach, Sonoma, and Yolo County (Also New York City; Providence Rhode Island, and Chicago.) Under consideration in Oakland (citywide). c. Prohibit the sale of menthol flavored cigarettes Would prohibit the sale of menthol flavored cigarettes within the entire unincorporated jurisdiction. The Food and Drug Administration has exempted “menthol” flavor from its ban on “characterizing flavors” in cigarettes. Yolo County (county-wide). Santa Clara County (County-wide, except adult-only shops). Berkeley (within 600 feet of schools) and Chicago (within 500 feet of high schools). Under consideration in Oakland (citywide). d. Require minimum pack size for cigars Require minimum pack size of 10 (current regulation for cigarettes is 20). Although federal and state law ban the sale of individual cigarettes, neither restrict the sale of individual cigars, including cigarillos and little cigars that are the same size as cigarettes. Exempts premium cigars that cost $5 or more. El Cerrito, Hayward, Sonoma, Huntington Park, Gardena, Union City. Under consideration in Oakland. e. Prohibit sale of tobacco products in pharmacies Prohibits the sale of tobacco products in pharmacies, consistent with the public’s perception of pharmacies as a place to go for health-related service and advice. Of the 9 pharmacies in the unincorporated county, three have already made corporate decisions to not sell tobacco products (2 CVS stores and Park Rexall). Richmond, San Francisco, Santa Clara County, Sonoma County, Berkeley, Healdsburg, Daly City, Hollister, Marin County, Novato. Under consideration in Oakland. f. Require tobacco retailers to comply with storefront signage laws Allows for suspension of retailer’s license if a retailer violates the state law or local law setting a maximum percentage of window space that can be covered by signs at retail locations. These laws exist for safety purposes, as they provide for more visibility into stores for law enforcement. This provides a means to bring retailers into compliance with health and safety laws. Santa Clara County and Yolo County. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 135 g. Require tobacco retailers to comply with drug paraphernalia sales laws Makes violations of state laws regarding drug paraphernalia or controlled substances a violation of a tobacco retailer license. Definition of what constitutes drug paraphernalia will be consistent with state law. Oakland, Richmond, Union City plus 8 other cities and counties (Firebaugh, Grass Valley, Huntington Park, Montebello, Parlier, Riverbank, Santa Cruz County, and Watsonville) (as of June, 2012) h. Require tobacco retailers to check ID of customers who appear younger than 27 Requires retailers to check the age of purchasers who appear to be under the age of 27. This measure helps insure that tobacco is not sold to youth and is even more relevant since the State advanced the legal age to purchase tobacco from 18 to 21 years of age. Concord, Richmond, Albany, Oakland, Santa Clara (age 30) plus 35 other jurisdictions i. Limit or “cap” the number of retailers that can sell tobacco products. This density measure limits the total number of County Tobacco Retailer Licenses that are issued to the current number of licenses. Sonoma, Orville, Lynwood, Huntington Park, San Francisco j. Remove tobacco advertising during license suspension Requires retailers to remove or cover all tobacco product-related advertising, in addition to tobacco products, during the period that their tobacco retailer license is suspended. Berkeley (remove products), Richmond, Concord, Albany, Oakland, Pacifica, Santa Clara plus 56 other jurisdictions k. Expand time period reviewed for prior violations of license Expands time period reviewed for prior violations of license from 24 months (2 years) to 60 months (5 years) when considering length of license suspension. Berkeley, El Cerrito, Richmond, Albany, Oakland plus 64 other jurisdictions Tobacco Retailing Businesses (Amendments to Zoning Code Chapter 88-26) l. Prohibit location of a new tobacco retailer near schools, parks, playgrounds and libraries. Prohibits a license to new tobacco retailers if located within a 1000 feet of a school, park, playground, or library. Existing tobacco retailing businesses that do not meet the location standards will become nonconforming uses. A nonconforming use will be allowed to continue operating under the ordinance. However, if a change in ownership in the business occurs more than 10 years after the effective date of the ordinance, or more than 10 years after the date the use becomes nonconforming, then the use (tobacco retailing) must be discontinued. Near Schools and other Youth Sensitive Areas: El Cerrito, Antioch, Dublin, Hayward, Union City, Vallejo, Albany, Oakland, Marin County, and San Rafael (plus 14 other jurisdictions). Near schools only: Berkeley, San Francisco, Santa Barbara County, Sacramento, Santa Clara County, Manhattan Beach, plus 5 other jurisdictions. m. Prohibit new tobacco retailers from locating within certain proximity of other retailers Requires that no new tobacco retailers locate within a certain distance 500 feet of another tobacco retailer. Existing tobacco retailing businesses that do not meet the location standards will become nonconforming uses. A nonconforming use will be allowed to continue operating under the ordinance. However, if a change in ownership in the business occurs more than 10 years after the effective date of the ordinance then the use (tobacco retailing) must be discontinued. El Cerrito, San Francisco, Santa Cruz, Hayward, Dublin, Santa Clara County, Union City, Vallejo, Fairfield, Saratoga, Rohnert Park, Temple City, Westminster, Selma, El Cajon n. Prohibit new “Significant Tobacco Retailers” Prohibits a new “Significant Tobacco Retailer” – a business that primarily sells tobacco products – from obtaining a tobacco retailer license. “Significant Tobacco Retailer” means any tobacco retailing business for which 20 percent or more of floor or display area is devoted to tobacco products, tobacco paraphernalia, or both. Prohibits any new ‘vape’ shops, hookah bars, or tobacco shops. El Cerrito; Huntington Park; Richmond; Carpinteria; Concord (no new hookah shops); Dublin (no vapor lounges or hookah bars); Hayward (no vapor lounges); Union City (no vapor lounges or hookah bars); and Pittsburg (moratorium on any new “smoke shops”) BOLDED jurisdictions adopted these provisions since the last report to the Board of Supervisors on 5/24/16. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 136 1 California Tobacco Control ProgramMenthol and Cigarettes What is Menthol and How is it Used? • Menthol is a naturally occurring compound derived from mint plants and is also synthetically produced. [1] Because of its cool, minty candy-like fl avor and fresh odor, it is used as an additive in many products including tobacco, lip balm, cough medication, mouthwash, toothpaste, chewing gum, and candy, as well as in beauty products and perfumes. [2] • Menthol’s anesthetizing effect makes the smoke “smooth” and easier to inhale while masking the harshness of tobacco, making menthol cigarettes more appealing to young and beginner smokers. [1] • Menthol allows smokers to inhale more deeply and for harmful particles to settle deeper inside the lungs. [2] By reducing airway pain and irritation, continuous menthol smoking can mask the early warning symptoms of smoking-induced respiratory problems. [3] • Menthol decreases the metabolism of nicotine and increases the amount of the addictive substance in the blood, making cigarettes even more dangerous and diffi cult to quit. [4] • Many menthol-only smokers underestimate the dangers of menthol in cigarettes and believe that menthol cigarettes are less harmful than regular cigarettes as compared to non-menthol-only smokers. [5] • Menthol cigarettes are not safer than regular cigarettes. Menthol cigarettes only mask the harshness of tobacco smoke, making it easier for new smokers to start and more challenging to quit. [6] • Menthol smokers show greater signs of nicotine dependence and have higher rates of quit attempts, [7] but are less likely to successfully quit smoking than other smokers. [8] • Menthol cigarettes are not safer than regular cigarettes. Menthol cigarettes have been shown to increase youth initiation, inhibit cessation, and promote relapse. [9] Scientifi c studies have shown that because of its sensory effects and fl avor, menthol may enhance the addictiveness of cigarettes. [10] • Menthol cigarettes account for approximately 25 percent of all cigarette sales in the U.S. [11] Moreover, more than 90 percent of all tobacco cigarettes contain menthol, regardless of being marketed as a mentholated cigarette. [12] 90 % of all tobacco cigarettes contain some menthol, regardless of being marketed as a mentholated cigarette [12] Menthol smokers show greater signs of nicotine dependence have higher rates of quit attempts but are less likely to successfully quit smoking than other smokers [ 7, 8 ] June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 137 2 California Tobacco Control Program Who Smokes Menthol Cigarettes? • In a national study conducted in 2009-10, 71 percent of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender young adult smokers (18-25) reported smoking menthol cigarettes. [16] • Generally, menthol smokers tend to be female, younger, members of ethnic minorities, have only a high school education, and buy packs rather than cartons. [17] • Menthol cigarettes are used disproportionately in communities of color. In combined 2004 to 2008 data, 82.6 percent of African American, 53.2 percent of Native Hawaiian/Pacifi c Islander, 32.3 percent of Hispanic/Latino, 31.2 percent of Asian, 24.8 percent of American Indian/Alaska Native, and 23.8 percent of white smokers aged 12 years and older reported using menthol cigarettes in the past month. [14] Menthol Cigarette Smoker Use by Age [13] • A 2013 study found that, among cigarette smokers, menthol cigarette use was more common among 12-17 year olds (56.7 percent) and 18-25 year olds (45 percent) than among older persons (30.5-34.7 percent). [13] • Approximately 19 million Americans smoke menthol cigarettes, including 1.1 million adolescents. [14] • More than 50 percent of menthol cigarette smokers are female (52.2 percent) and nearly 30 percent of all menthol smokers are African American (29.4 percent). [15] • Although the use of cigarettes is declining in the United States (U.S.), sales of menthol cigarettes have steadily increased in recent years, especially among young people and new smokers. [14] 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 PercentAge 12-17 56.7% 18-25 45.0 % 26-34 34.7% 35-49 30.5 % 50+ 30.7% Menthol Cigarette Smoker Use by Race/Ethnicity [14] Race/Ethnicity 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 African American 82.6 % Native American /Pacific Islander 53.2% Hispanic /Latino 32.3% Asian 31.2% American Indian /Alaska Native 24.8 % White 23.8 %Percent54.5% of high school and 48.4 % of middle school current tobacco users smoked menthol cigarettes. [18] June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 138 3 California Tobacco Control Program Predatory Marketing Tactics Target Young, Female, and Minority Populations • Menthol cigarettes were originally developed for and promoted to women. [20] In order to appeal to women, menthol cigarette advertisements often contain images of romantic couples, flowers, and springtime. [20] • Cigarette packaging design and color are carefully chosen by the tobacco industry to create specific associations. An example of this is the green packages for mentholated cigarettes which suggest coolness and freshness. [19] • Tobacco retailers in low income, urban communities having high menthol sales are more likely to place larger exterior tobacco advertisements and have more menthol advertisements on their store fronts. [1] • Tobacco retailers in low income, urban communities offer higher discount rates on mentholated cigarette brands, including between $1.00 and $1.50 off per pack or buy one (1) get one (1) free promotions, while more affluent white neighborhoods see discounts on menthols of only about $0.50 off per pack or buy two (2) get one (1) free offers. [9] • Camel brand smokers and menthol smokers (Newport and Kool), who are more often young adults and African Americans, are much more likely to use promotional offers than those who smoke other brands. [21] • Young adults and African Americans are also less likely to switch from menthol to non-menthol cigarettes regardless of higher product price. [22] Menthol brands like Newport have specifically targeted adolescents and young adults with their marketing messages [20], through “youthful imagery, messages promoting an appealing sensory experience, and peer group acceptance.” [6] June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 139 4 California Tobacco Control Program 4 Why Mentholated Tobacco Products Matter to the Health of the African American Community • African Americans have been one of the main target groups of menthol cigarette advertising. [24] Tobacco industry documents reveal aggressive menthol tobacco product marketing in urban, low-income, African American neighborhoods through marketing; such as advertising more desirable menthol promotions; dedicating a greater store display space for menthol products; and allowing more menthol interior and exterior signage in stores. [25] • Historically, African Americans have been exposed to hundreds of tobacco advertisements and the tobacco industry has placed proportionately more menthol cigarette advertisements in African American magazines than in mainstream magazines. [26] Many of these targeted advertisements incorporate elements of African American culture, music, and messages related to racial identity and urban nightlife. [32] • Today, menthol cigarettes are the overwhelming favorite tobacco product among African Americans. A 2015 CDC report found that among current cigarette smokers, 70.5 percent of African Americans reported menthol cigarette use; about 20 percentage points higher than whites and Hispanics. [18] • The tobacco industry has been highly infl uential in the African American community for decades, providing funding and other resources to community leaders and emphasizing publicly its support for civil rights causes and groups, while ignoring the negative health effects of its products on those it claims to support. Tobacco industry support for African American communities is estimated to be as high as $25 million per year. [27] • For decades, the tobacco industry has donated generous amounts of money to members of the Congressional Black Caucus Foundation, the National Urban League, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored people and the United Negro College Fund. [28] • Many African American organizations opposing the ban on menthol in tobacco products continue to receive money from the tobacco industry. In 2014, Lorillard Tobacco donated campaign cash to half of all African American members of Congress, making African American lawmakers (all but one of whom are Democrats) 19 times as likely as their Democratic peers to get a donation. [29] 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Hispanic White Non-Hispanic Other Races Non-Hispanic BlackPercent52.3 %51.4 %58.1% 70.5 % Race/Ethnicity According to the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Tobacco Products Scientific Advisory Committee, by 2020 the African American population will have suffered more than 4,700 excess deaths due to menthol in cigarettes, and more than 460,000 more African Americans will have started smoking due to the impact of menthol. [23] Menthol Use Among Current Smokers by Race/Ethnicity [18] June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 140 5 California Tobacco Control Program Menthol and Cessation • A leading model of smoking in the U.S. predicts that a 10 percent quit rate among menthol smokers would save thousands of lives, preventing more than 4,000 smoking-attributable deaths in the first ten years, and that more than 300,000 lives would be saved in over 40 years. Approximately 100,000 of those lives saved would be African American. [30] • Another model predicts that if menthol were prohibited, between 2010 and 2020, over 2.2 million people would not start smoking. By 2050, the number of people who would not start smoking would reach 9 million. [6] • Among African American smokers, menthol cigarette smoking is negatively associated with successful smoking cessation. [31] • Quitting menthol cigarettes is particularly difficult, because menthol smokers have to get over their dependence on nicotine as well as positive associations with menthol itself such as the minty taste, cooling sensation, and sensory excitation. [9] • Youth who initiate smoking with menthol cigarettes are more likely to become regular, addicted smokers and are more likely to show higher measures of dependence than youth who initiate with non-menthol cigarettes. [32] • Menthol smokers in the U.S. who report consuming 6-10 cigarettes per day show greater signs of nicotine dependence (i.e., shorter time to first cigarette in the day) than comparable non-menthol smokers. [33] • Menthol smokers in general and African American smokers in particular, have a difficult time quitting despite smoking significantly fewer cigarettes per day compared to non-menthol smokers. [26], [34] Compared to non-menthol African American light smokers, menthol smokers are younger and have less confidence to quit smoking. [35] More than half of Americans support a ban on menthol [36], and a national study found that 44.5 percent of African Americans and 44 percent of females would quit smoking if menthol cigarettes were prohibited. [23] [30] 10 % Quit rate over 40 years would save 300,000 lives 100,000 of those lives would be African American Menthol Smokers June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 141 6 California Tobacco Control Program Food and Drug Administration Regulation of Menthol Tobacco Products • In 2009, Congress passed the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (FSPTCA) granting the FDA with regulatory authority over tobacco products. [37] • Effective September 22, 2009, the FSPTCA banned artificial or natural flavorings, as well as herbs or spices, which produce characterizing flavors in cigarettes. This included flavors such as strawberry, grape, orange, clove, cinnamon, pineapple, vanilla, coconut, licorice, cocoa, chocolate, cherry, and coffee. Menthol, however, was exempt from the ban. [38] • The FDA has the ability to prohibit menthol as an ingredient in cigarettes and other tobacco products. Tobacco Products Scientific Advisory Committee (TPSAC) was established and charged with developing a report assessing the impact of the use of menthol in cigarettes on public health and proposing recommendations to the FDA on whether menthol should be regulated or not. [37] • The TPSAC report and recommendations were submitted to the FDA on March 23, 2011. The TPSAC report found that the availability of menthol cigarettes has an adverse impact on public health in the U.S. and recommended removal of menthol cigarettes from the marketplace. [37] • On April 12, 2013, 20 leading national organizations and advocates filed a formal Citizen Petition urging the FDA to prohibit menthol as a characterizing flavoring in cigarettes. More than 1,000 public comments were submitted to the FDA. [37] • In July of 2013, the FDA released a preliminary scientific review that found that menthol made it easier to start smoking and allowed for a faster progression to regular use of cigarette smoking; it also found that menthol made it harder to quit smoking, especially among African American menthol smokers. The FDA solicited public comment on the “potential regulation” of menthol cigarettes. [39] • In July of 2014, a Federal District Court Judge, Justice Richard Leon, issued a decision requiring the FDA to appoint new members to the TPSAC and to prohibit the agency from using the 2013 scientific review prepared by the TPSAC. The judge ruled that the new TPSAC members must be unbiased and impartial, following a 2011 lawsuit by Lorillard Tobacco Company and R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company against the FDA. The lawsuit sought a court order to require the FDA to reconstitute the TPSAC’s membership, alleging that three TPSAC members had conflicts of interest because of their ongoing work as expert witnesses against tobacco companies in tobacco litigation and due to their consulting fees paid by pharmaceutical companies in connection with certain smoking cessation products. The FDA was ordered to reconstitute the advisory panel’s membership and refrain from using the prior advisory panel’s report on menthol cigarettes. [39] • In September of 2014, the U.S. Department of Justice filed an appeals motion on behalf of the FDA in response to Circuit Court Justice Leon’s ruling in favor of the Tobacco Industry. [40] • In January 2016, a panel for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit overturned the lower Federal District Court ruling, holding that Lorillard and R.J Reynolds Tobacco Companies lacked standing to bring the case to the courts. The court found that the injuries alleged by the plaintiffs were “too remote and uncertain…insufficiently imminent” and that the inclusion of the three members of the TPSAC committee with an alleged conflict of interest “by no means rendered the risk of eventual adverse FDA action substantially probable or imminent.” [41] • The FDA has still not made a recommendation on whether to ban or limit menthol cigarettes. [39] June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 142 7 California Tobacco Control Program 1/2017 References 1. Kreslake, J.M., et al., Tobacco industry control of menthol in cigarettes and targeting of adolescents and young adults. American Journal of Public Health, 2008. 98 (9): p. 1685. 2. Kreslake, J.M. and V.B. Yerger, Tobacco industry knowledge of the role of menthol in chemosensory perception of tobacco smoke. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 2010. 12 : p. 98-101. 3. Garten, S. and R.V. Falkner, Continual smoking of mentholated cigarettes may mask the early warning symptoms of respiratory disease. Preventive Medicine, 2003. 37(4): p. 291-296. 4. Benowitz, N.L., B. Herrera, and P. Jacob, Mentholated cigarette smoking inhibits nicotine metabolism. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 2004. 310 (3): p. 1208-1215. 5. Unger, J.B., et al., Menthol and non–menthol cigarette use among Black smokers in Southern California. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 2010. 6. Tobacco Product Scientific Advisory Committee (TPSAC), Menthol cigarettes and the public health: Review of the scientific evidence and recommendations., US Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration, Editor. 2011: Rockville, MD. 7. Levy, D.T., et al., Quit attempts and quit rates among menthol and nonmenthol smokers in the United States. 2011. 8. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Preliminary scientific evaluation of the possible public health effects of menthol versus nonmenthol cigarettes. July 2013. 9. Gardiner, P. and P.I. Clark, Menthol cigarettes: moving toward a broader definition of harm. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 2010. 12 : p. 85-93. 10. Henningfield, J.E., et al., Does menthol enhance the addictiveness of cigarettes? An agenda for research. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 2003. 11. Giovino, G.A., et al., Epidemiology of menthol cigarette use. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 2004. 6: p. 67-81. 12. Wickham, R., Focus: Addiction: How Menthol Alters Tobacco- Smoking Behavior: A Biological Perspective. The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, 2015. 88 (3): p. 279. 13. Giovino, G.A., et al., Differential trends in cigarette smoking in the USA: is menthol slowing progress? Tobacco Control, 2013. 14. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, The NSDU Report: Use of Menthol Cigarettes. 2009: Rockville, MD. 15. Rock, V.J., et al., Menthol cigarette use among racial and ethnic groups in the United States, 2004–2008. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 2010. 12 : p. 117-124. 16. National Youth Advocacy Coalition, Coming Out about Smoking: A Report from the National LGBTQ Young Adult Tobacco Project 2010: Washington, DC. 17. Fernander, A., et al., Are age of smoking initiation and purchasing patterns associated with menthol smoking? Addiction, 2010. 105 (1): p. 39-45. 18. Corey, C.G., et al., Flavored tobacco product use among middle and high school students—United States, 2014. Morbitity Mortality Weekly Report, 2015. 64(38): p. 1066-1070. 19. Davis, R.M., et al., The role of the media in promoting and reducing tobacco use. 2008. 20. Sutton, C.D. and R.G. Robinson, The marketing of menthol cigarettes in the United States: populations, messages, and channels. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 2004. 6(1): p. 83-91. 21. White, V.M., et al., Cigarette promotional offers: who takes advantage? American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2006. 30(3): p. 225-231. 22. Tauras, J.A., et al., Menthol and non-menthol smoking: the impact of prices and smoke-free air laws. Addiction, 2010. 105 (1): p. 115-123. 23. Tobacco Control Legal Consortium et al., Citizen Petition to Food and Drug Administration, Prohibiting Menthol As A Characterizing Flavor in Cigarettes (April 12, 2013). 24. Gardiner, P.S., The African Americanization of menthol cigarette use in the United States. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 2004. 6(1): p. 55-65. 25. Cruz, T.B., L.T. Wright, and G. Crawford, The menthol marketing mix: targeted promotions for focus communities in the United States. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 2010. 12 (suppl 2): p. S147-S153. 26. American Heart Association, Tobacco industry’s targeting of youth, minorities and women. 27. Yerger, V.B. and R.E. Malone, African American leadership groups: smoking with the enemy. Tobacco Control, 2002. 11 (4): p. 336-345. 28. Myron Levin, Lorillard, other tobacco companies use politics to protect menthol brands, in Fairwarning. November 18, 2015, News and Record: Greensboro, North Carolina. 29. Levin, M., Racial Politics Flavor Debate Over Banning Menthol Cigarettes, in Fair Warning November 17, 2015. 30. Pearson, J.L. and K. Blackman, Modeling the future effects of a menthol ban on smoking prevalence and smoking-attributable deaths in the United States. American Journal of Public Health, 2011. 101(7): p. 1236. 31. Stahre, M., et al., Racial/ethnic differences in menthol cigarette smoking, population quit ratios and utilization of evidence-based tobacco cessation treatments. Addiction, 2010. 105 (1): p. 75-83. 32. Nonnemaker, J., et al., Initiation with menthol cigarettes and youth smoking uptake. Addiction, 2013. 108 (1): p. 171-178. 33. Fagan, P., et al., Nicotine dependence and quitting behaviors among menthol and non-menthol smokers with similar consumptive patterns. Addiction, 2010. 105 (1): p. 55-74. 34. Trinidad, D.R., et al., Menthol cigarettes and smoking cessation among racial/ethnic groups in the United States. Addiction, 2010. 105 (1): p. 84-94. 35. Okuyemi, K.S., et al., Relationship between menthol cigarettes and smoking cessation among African American light smokers. Addiction, 2007. 102 (12): p. 1979-1986. 36. Hartman, A.M. What menthol smokers report they would do if menthol cigarettes were no longer sold. in FDA Tobacco Products Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting. 2011. 37. Public Health Law Center. Federal Regulation of Menthol Tobacco Products.38. Family Smoking Prevention And Tobacco Control Act,, in Public Law No. 111-31, 123 Stat. 1776 (codified, in relevant part, at 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1333-34 and 21 U.S.C.A. § 301 et seq.). 2009. 39. Sabrina Tavernise, F.D.A. Closer to Decision About Menthol Cigarettes, in The New York Times. July 23, 2013.40. FDA Appeals Court Ruling on TPSAC Conflict of Interest, in American Thoracic Society News. September 22, 2014. 41. Stern, M.B., et al., R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, et al. v. United States Food and Drug Administration, et al., in 14-5226, United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, Editor. January 15, 2016. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 143 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 144 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 145 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 146 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 147 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 148 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 149 1 Tobacco Retailer 3/2/17 Educational and Input Session: Comment Summary and Public Health Department Responses Background. A notice of the tobacco retailer educational and input session was mailed out to licensed tobacco retailers in the unincorporated County on 2/16/17. The session was held on 3/2/17 from 1:00pm to 2:30pm at 597 Center Ave, Room 120, Martinez. Contra Costa Tobacco Prevention Project staff, Denice Dennis and Jennifer Grand, led the session. Staff presented an overview of youth tobacco influences in the retail environment and draft revisions to the County Tobacco Retailer Licensing Ordinance and Zoning Code that staff had been directed to prepare by the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors. a) Revise the definition of “tobacco products” in the Tobacco Retailer License Ordinance to be inclusive of newer electronic smoking devices and “liquids” that currently fall outside of the definition b) Prohibit the sale of flavored (non-cigarette) tobacco products c) Prohibit the sale of menthol flavored cigarettes within at least 1000 feet of schools d) Require a minimum pack size of ten (10) for little cigars and cigarillos e) Prohibit new tobacco retailers from operating within 1000 feet of schools, parks, playgrounds and libraries f) Prohibit new tobacco retailers from operating within 500 feet of new or existing tobacco retailers g) Prohibit the sale of tobacco products in pharmacies j) Prohibit new “Significant Tobacco Retailers”, including “vape” shops, hookah bars or smoke shops k) Require tobacco retailers to comply with state and local storefront signage laws l) Require tobacco retailers to comply with drug paraphernalia sales laws m) Require tobacco retailers to check ID of customers who appear younger than 27 n) Cap the number of retailers that can sell tobacco products at current number of licenses issued by the County h) Require tobacco retailers who have their license suspended to remove tobacco advertising during license suspension periods i) Expand the time period reviewed for prior violations of the license (the “look-back” period) from 24 months (2 years) to 60 months (5 years) when considering the length of a license suspension for retailers found to be in violation of the law Staff described the process for review of the proposed changes to county ordinances, and that the Family and Human Services Committee would discuss the proposed ordinances at the April 24, 2017 public meeting. The meeting was then opened up for input from the tobacco retailers. In an effort to delineate concerns from tobacco retailers in the unincorporated County, Staff asked tobacco retailers with businesses in the unincorporated county speak first, and others in attendance save their comments until after all local retailers had spoken. It became clear later on that many individuals who were from outside of the County spoke during the time set aside for local retailers, so it was not possible to separate the input and concerns. Thirty-seven people signed in on the sign-in sheet, however many people in attendance did not sign-in. Staff estimated over 50 people in attendance. The following individuals signed in at the meeting:  Thirteen individuals representing 8 tobacco retailing businesses in the unincorporated county.  Ten other individuals representing tobacco retailers and vape shops from Contra Costa cities.  Six tobacco retailers and vape shops from other Counties, including 7-Eleven Corporate.  Representatives from Log Cabin Republicans, other Industry groups (R Street Institute and Not Blowing Smoke), and the Greater Bay Franchise Owners Association. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 150 2 Overview of Concerns. Several themes emerged from the concerns voiced by meeting attendees. These are summarized below with responses from Health Services staff. 1) Why is the County restricting sale of flavored electronic smoking devices which the tobacco and vape industry have stated are “safer products”? Research demonstrates that electronic smoking devices are not safe products, and are now known to be a “gateway” product to a lifetime of addiction among youth.i,ii,iii,iv A large national study found that the odds of a heart attack increased by 42% among people who used e-cigarettes.v Vape liquids contain nicotine and chemicals known to cause cancer and produce an aerosol that can harm the lungs.vi Vaping causes as much short-term inflammation in the lungs as regular cigarettes,vii and nicotine-free vapor may cause even more.viii The proposed prohibition on the sale of flavored tobacco products applies to flavored electronic smoking devices and flavored vape liquids that are used in electronic smoking devices because these flavored products are very attractive to youth. These flavors (e.g., strawberry, chocolate, licorice) are currently banned in cigarettes in the U.S. due to their appeal to youth.ix Sale of “tobacco” flavored electronic smoking devices and vape liquids would still be allowed for sale. Electronic smoking devices are the most common tobacco product used among high school and middle school students.x Teens that vape are three times more likely than their peers to smoke cigarettes one year later,xi and eighth graders who vape are 10 times more likely than their peers to eventually smoke cigarettes.xii In 2013, the Contra Costa Board of Supervisors voted to prohibit the use of electronic smoking devices in areas where smoking of conventional tobacco products is prohibited, because these products were (and still are) unregulated, and have been demonstrated to lead young people to try other tobacco products, including conventional cigarettes, which are known to cause disease and lead to premature death. In addition to the possible health risk associated with these products, the Board of Supervisors were concerned that use of e-cigarettes in public places and places of employment could increase social acceptance of smoking. 2) Why is the County restricting a product that people use for smoking cessation? Electronic smoking devices are not approved by the Federal Drug Administration (FDA) as a smoking cessation product. FDA-approved smoking cessation products are available, and the proposed revisions to this ordinance do not impact sale of those products. While there is anecdotal evidence that some people have successfully used electronic smoking devices to quit smoking cigarettes, research has found that many people who attempt to quit smoking by using electronic smoking devices end up with dual use of both traditional tobacco and electronic smoking devices.xiii Recent declines in the prevalence of cigarette smoking among youth have coincided with an increased use of e-cigarettes and hookah tobacco.xiv 3) Minimum pack size of 10 little cigars and cigarillos is unreasonable. Although the sale of individual cigarettes is banned by federal and state law,xv neither federal nor state laws restrict the sale of small packs of cigars. While cigarette use is decreasing, the use of other tobacco products is increasing.xvi Little cigars and cigarillos are sold individually and in small packs for as little as 5 for 99 cents, making them more affordable and appealing to youth.xvii 50% of Contra Costa retailers sell these products as singles.xviii This proposed ordinance would exempt premium cigars costing $5 or more. 4) Tobacco 21 already passed, why does the County need new laws? The California state Tobacco 21 law addresses tobacco sales to youth, while the proposed County ordinance changes address a more comprehensive approach to reducing youth smoking by addressing youth tobacco influences in the retail environment. Research shows that teens are more likely to be influenced to use tobacco products by tobacco marketing than by peer pressure,xix and the U.S. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 151 3 Surgeon General reports that “tobacco industry advertising and promotion cause youth and young adults to start smoking, and nicotine addiction keeps people smoking past those ages.”xx The reasons for prohibiting sale of flavored tobacco products and small packs of little cigars and cigarillos are delineated above. Prohibiting new tobacco retailers from locating near schools, parks, playgrounds and libraries, and close to existing retailers helps reduce the amount of tobacco product marketing and promotions that youth are exposed to throughout our communities. 5) Why is the County putting the burden on (regulating/penalizing) tobacco retailers when youth are getting tobacco from other sources? The intent of the proposed ordinances is to reduce youth tobacco product use through changes in the retail environment. The County Board of Supervisors has the authority to adopt regulations that protect the health and safety of residents in its jurisdiction. Ninety percent of adult smokers begin smoking while in their teens, or earlier; and two-thirds become regular, daily smokers before the age of 19.xxi Tobacco advertising and products that youth see in the retail environment have a greater effect on influencing youth to start smoking than peer pressure.xxii A study evaluating the effect of the ban on flavored tobacco products in New York City showed a 37% reduction in teens having tried flavored tobacco and a 28% lower chance of teens use of any type of tobacco product, even when surrounding jurisdictions do not also ban flavored tobacco.xxiii 6) The 5-year look-back period for violations of tobacco retailer license is too long, and some corporations may penalize local franchise owners for previous tobacco retailer license violations. The term “look-back period” refers to the time period reviewed for prior violations of the existing Tobacco Retailer License when considering length of license suspension for a current violation. The draft ordinance increases this period from 2 years to 5 years. A five-year look-back period is well established as the current best practice for tobacco retailer licensing in California. El Cerrito, Richmond, Albany, Berkeley Oakland, and 64 other jurisdictions in California have this provision included in their tobacco retailer licensing ordinance. 7) The 10-year “sunset” clause affects retirement, hurts tobacco retailers. The County’s existing Tobacco Retailer Licensing Ordinance requires retailers that sell tobacco products to renew their license on an annual basis, and prohibits transfer of the license to any other owner or location. The draft Tobacco Retailing Businesses Ordinance that is in the Zoning Code allows existing tobacco retailers that are located within 1000 feet of schools, parks, playgrounds and libraries, (or within 500 feet of an existing retailer) to renew their tobacco retailer license annually into perpetuity, as long as they comply with the County’s Tobacco Retailer Licensing Ordinance. Existing retailers, within 1000 feet of schools, parks, playgrounds and libraries (or within 500 feet of another retailer), who wish to sell their business as eligible to apply for a new County tobacco retailer license, must sell within ten years of adoption of the Tobacco Retailing Businesses Ordinance. If a new school, park, playground or library is established within 1000 feet of an existing tobacco retailer, and that existing retailer wishes to sell their business as eligible to apply for a new County Tobacco Retailer License, the business must be sold within ten years of the establishment of the new school, park, playground or library. Some jurisdictions in the state with similar laws do not allow existing store sites within 1000 feet of schools, parks, playgrounds and/or libraries that are sold to be eligible for a Tobacco Retailer License at all. According to the American Lung Association, nine California jurisdictions enacted similar tobacco retailing density provisions between 2011 and 2015. Three of these jurisdictions prohibit tobacco retailing at the locations after the business is sold (no matter when the sale occurs); one “sunsets” the provision at 5 years; and one has a similar 10-year sunset provision. The other 4 jurisdictions allow the location to be sold as eligible to apply for a tobacco retailer license at any time. The 10-year “sunset” clause in the draft ordinance allows retailers the time to develop an alternative June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 152 4 business plan, and the County Tobacco Prevention Program has developed a list of resources to help with this. 8) Distance restrictions should be state law, not local county law. Local jurisdictions have the authority to create local land use regulations. Additionally, California’s successes in reducing youth smoking rates and overall community tobacco use over the past three decades have been built on local tobacco control laws. The Contra Costa Board of Supervisors have been leaders in local tobacco control laws for some 30 years, from smoke-free restaurant sections, to comprehensive outdoor secondhand smoke protections, to requiring a tobacco retailer license for those who sell tobacco products. 9) Adults use these products, not just youth. Ninety percent of adult smokers begin while in their teens, or earlier; and two-thirds become regular, daily smokers before the age of 19.xxiv Young people are much more likely to use candy-and-fruit- flavored tobacco products than adults.xxv In 2015, 80% of youth age 12-17 who ever-reported experimenting with tobacco started with a flavored tobacco product.xxvi The tobacco industry has strategically used flavored little cigars and cigarillos to replace the banned flavored cigarette market, which are the same size and shape as cigarettes and packaged as cheaply as 5 for 99 cents.xxvii 10) Chicago recently rolled back buffer zones for sale of flavored tobacco products because it hurt retailers. Why is the County doing this? Chicago was the first city in the country to regulate the sale of flavored tobacco products, and prohibited the sale of these products, including menthol cigarettes, within 500 feet of all schools. Recently, the city decided to change the law to include only high schools, due to pressures from retailers. California has learned a great deal from Chicago’s experience, and best practice is now jurisdiction-wide regulations. A study conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) found that 42% of middle and high school students who smoke reported either using flavored little cigars or flavored cigarettes.xxviii Prohibiting the sale of flavored tobacco products jurisdiction-wide not only protects all youth from tobacco influences in the retail environment, it provides a level playing field for retailers who choose to sell tobacco products. 11) Why is the County proposing more restrictions on tobacco retailers when the state has tobacco control laws already? The California Board of Equalization requires all tobacco retailers in the state to purchase a license to sell cigarettes and other tobacco products. This license was established to ensure compliance with cigarette and other tobacco product tax laws and the Board of Equalization is only charged with enforcing tax laws. The State also prohibits the sale of tobacco products to anyone under the age of 21. Local jurisdictions have authority to enact stronger laws in order to protect the health and safety of their residents. The County Board of Supervisors have been leaders in tobacco control for over thirty years, and the draft ordinances apply a comprehensive approach to address youth tobacco influences in the retail environment. 12) Why is the County proposing more regulations when the FDA already regulates tobacco products including electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS), hookah, dissolvables, cigars, and future tobacco products? After considerable pressure from national tobacco control advocates across the country, the FDA issued a rule, effective August 2016, to include these non-cigarette products in the definition of “tobacco products” under the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (Tobacco Control Act of 2009). The FDA expects that manufacturers will continue selling their products for up to two years while they submit a new tobacco product application and review is expected to be at June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 153 5 least an additional year.xxix However, there is still a backlog for regulations enacted in 2009, making any real change in FDA regulation based on the new rule still many years out. The draft ordinances provide the opportunity to protect youth from tobacco influences in the community now, rather than waiting for an unsure future with FDA regulations. 13) We need education for children, not more restrictions on business. Education programs for children about the dangers of tobacco already exist in the statewide Tobacco Use Prevention Education (TUPE) program. Education alone is not enough, and both the Centers for Disease Control and the Tobacco Education and Research and Oversight Committee of California recommend comprehensive approaches for tobacco prevention efforts that include both education and local policy. xxx,xxxi The draft provisions are best practices to reduce youth tobacco influences in the retail environment. 14) Tobacco Retailers are doing a good job complying with the no-sales-to-minors law. The ordinances under consideration were written to address a comprehensive approach to addressing youth tobacco influences in our communities, which are linked to youth uptake of smoking, including use of electronic smoking devices. No-sales-to-minors laws are one part of this comprehensive approach. One of the Retailer Association representatives presented information from the American Lung Association that the County’s illegal sales rates were very low. Sales rates vary greatly year by year, with sales rates over a 5 year period for the unincorporated county ranging from 7% in 2004 to 16% in 2015. The proposed ordinances are intended to supplement no-sales-to- minors laws with a more comprehensive approach to addressing youth tobacco influences in the community. Some individual comments included:  Concern regarding distance being calculated “as the crow flies.”  The provision banning pharmacies from selling tobacco was welcome.  Tobacco products should be taxed instead of regulated in the ways the proposed provisions suggested.  Will tobacco retailers be able to sell marijuana? Note: California law states that a business cannot sell alcohol or tobacco as well as marijuana xxxii i Cardenas, V. M., Evans, V. L., Balamurugan, A., Faramawi, M. F., Delongchamp, R. R., Wheeler, J. G.. (2016). Use of electronic nicotine delivery systems and recent initiation of smoking among US youth. International Journal of Public Health. ii Wills, T. A., Knight, R., Sargent, J. D., Gibbons, F. X., Pagano, I., and Williams, R. J. Longitudinal study of e-cigarette use and onset of cigarette smoking among high school students in Hawaii. Tobacco Control, 2016. iii Leventhal, A. M., Strong, D. R., Kirkpatrick, M. G., Unger, J. B., Sussman, S., Riggs, N. R., Stone, M. D., et al. (2015). Association of Electronic Cigarette Use with Initiation of Combustible Tobacco Product Smoking in Early Adolescence. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 314(7):700-707. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.8950. iv Primack, B. A., Soneji, S., Stoolmiller, M. Fine, M. J., and Sargent, J. D. (2015). Progression to Traditional Cigarette Smoking After Electronic Cigarette Use Among US Adolescents and Young Adults. JAMA Pediatrics, 169 (11): 1018-1023. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.1742. v Temesgen, N, et al., A cross sectional study reveals an association between electronic cigarette use and myocardial infarction. Poster. George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences Poster Presentations. Spring 2017. vi Goniewicz, M. L., et al., Levels of selected carcinogens and toxicants in vapour from electronic cigarettes. Tobacco Control, 2014. 23(2): p. 133-139. vii Vardavas, C.I.; Anagnostopoulos, N.; Kougias, M.; Evangelopoulou, V.; Connolly, G.N.; Behrakis, P.K. “Short -term Pulmonary Effects of Using an Electronic Cigarette: Impact on Respiratory Flow Resistance, Impedance, and Exhaled Nitric Oxide.” CHEST, June 2012 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 154 6 viii Grana, Rachel, et al. “E-Cigarettes: A scientific Review.” Circulation (2014): 1,2,5,7,12. US National Library of Medicine. ix US Department of Health and Human Services, US Food and Drug Administration, Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act, Section 2 Findings, June 22, 2009, available at: https://www.fda.gov.TobaccoProducts/Labeling?RulesRegulationsGuidance?ucm261832.htm . x US Department of Health and Human Services. “E-Cigarette Use Among Youth and Young Adults, A Report of the Surgeon General, 2016” https://e-cigarettes.surgeongeneral.gov/documents/2016_SGR_Fact_Sheet_508.pdf. Accessed March 2017. xi Cardenas, V. M., Evans, V. L., Balamurugan, A., Faramawi, M. F., Delongchamp, R. R., Wheeler, J. G. (2016). Use of electronic nicotine delivery systems and recent initiation of smoking among US youth. International Journal of Public Health. xii Miech, R. A., et al., E-cigarettes and the drug use patterns of adolescents, Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 18(5), 654-659 (2016). xiii Borderud, S. P., Li, Y., Burkhalter, J. E., Sheffer, C. E. and Ostroff, J. S. (2014), Electronic cigarette use among patients with cancer: Characteristics of electronic cigarette users and their smoking cessation outcomes. Cancer, 120: 3527–3535. doi:10.1002/cncr.28811. See Also: Center for Disease Control and Prevention, “Dual Use of Tobacco Products”. https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/campaign/tips/diseases/dual-tobacco-use.html. Accessed March 2017. xiv Arrazola, R. A., et al., Tobacco use among middle and high school students – United States, 2011-2014. MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 2015. 64(14): p. 381-5. xv 21 C.F.R. § 1140.14(d); Cal. Penal Code § 308.2 xvi Cullen J, Mowery P, Delnevo C, et al. 2011. “Seven-Year Patterns in US Cigar Use Epidemiology Among Young Adults Aged 18-25 Years: A Focus on Race/Ethnicity and Brand.” American Journal of Public Health 101(10): 1955- 1962. xvii California Department of Public Health. 2012. Tobacco in the Retail Environment, www.cdph.ca.gov/programs/tobacco/Documents/Tobacco%20Retail%20Environment%20Fact%20Sheet_Easy%20 Print.pdf xviii Healthy Stores for a Healthy Community. 2016 Contra Costa County Local Data. xix Evans, N, et al., “Influence of Tobacco Marketing and Exposure to Smokers on Adolescent Susceptibility to Smoking.” Journal of the National Cancer Institute , October 1995. xx HHS, The Health Consequences of Smoking – 50 Years of Progress: A Report of the Surgeon General, 2014. http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/reports/50-years-of-progress/. xxi SAMHSA. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality. National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH), 2014.ICPSR36361-v1. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2016-03-22. http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR36361.v1.; See also, HHS, Preventing Tobacco Use Among Youth and Young Adults, A Report of the Surgeon General, 2012. HHS, Youth and Tobacco: Preventing Tobacco Use among Young People: A Report of the Surgeon General, 1994. http://profiles.nlm.nih.gov/NN/B/C/F/T/_/nnbcft.pdf xxii Pollay, R. et al., “The Last Straw? Cigarette Advertising and Realized Market Shares Among Youths and Adults,” Journal of Marketing 60(2): 1-16, April 1996. xxiii Farley and Johns, Tobacco Control, “New York City flavored tobacco product sales ban evaluation,” Jan 26, 2017. 78-84. xxiv SAMHSA. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality. National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH), 2014.ICPSR36361-v1. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2016-03-22. http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR36361.v1.; See also, HHS, Preventing Tobacco Use Among Youth and Young Adults, A Report of the Surgeon General, 2012. HHS, Youth and Tobacco: Preventing Tobacco Use among Young People: A Report of the Surgeon General, 1994. http://profiles.nlm.nih.gov/NN/B/C/F/T/_/nnbcft.pdf xxv King, B.A., et al., Flavored Cigar Smoking among US Adults; Findings from the 2009-2010 National Adult Tobacco Survey. Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 2013. 15(2): p. 608-614. xxvi Ambrose, B. K., et al., Flavored Tobacco Product Use Among US Youth Aged 12-17 Years, 2013-2014. JAMA, 2015: p 1-3. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 155 7 xxvii Kostygina et al., MBJ Journals Tobacco Control, Tobacco industry use of flavours to recruit new users of little cigars and cigarillos, 2014, 25(1), abstract available at: http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/25/1/66. xxviii King, B.A., et al., Flavored little cigar and flavored cigarette use among US middle and high school students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 2014. 54(1): p. 40-46. xxix US Food and Drug Administration, 2016. “FDA takes significant steps to protect Americans from dangers of tobacco through new regulation” https://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm499234.htm . Accessed March 2017. xxx Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Best Practices for Comprehensive Tobacco Control Programs—2014. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health, 2014. xxxi Tobacco Education and Research Oversight Committee. Changing Landscape: Countering New Threats, 2015- 2017. Toward a Tobacco-Free California Master Plan. Sacramento, CA: Tobacco Education and Research Oversight Committee. 2014. xxxii California Health and Safety Code Division 10, Uniform Controlled Substances Act Chapter 6, Article 2. Marijuana (11357-11362.9) Prepared by the Tobacco Prevention Program, Contra Costa Public Health 4/13/17 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 156 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 157 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 158 ORDINANCE NO. 2017-01 REDLINE VERSION 1 DIVISION 445 SECONDHAND SMOKE AND TOBACCO PRODUCT CONTROL Chapter 445-2 GENERAL PROVISIONS 445-2.002 Title. This division is known as the secondhand smoke and tobacco product control ordinance of Contra Costa County. (Ords. 2006-66 § 4, 98-43 § 2, 91-44 § 2) 445-2.004 Purpose. The purposes of this division are to protect the public health, safety and welfare against the health hazards and harmful effects of the use of addictive tobacco products; and further to maintain a balance between the desires of persons who smoke and the need of nonsmokers to breathe smoke-free air, while recognizing that where these conflict, the need to breathe smoke- free air shall have priority. (Ords. 2006-66 § 4, 98-43 § 2, 91-44 § 2) 445-2.006 Definitions. For the purposes of this division, the following words and phrases have the following meanings: (a) “Characterizing flavor” means a distinguishable taste or aroma imparted by a tobacco product or any byproduct produced by the tobacco product that is perceivable by an ordinary consumer by either the sense of taste or smell, other than the taste or aroma of tobacco. A “characterizing flavor” includes, but is not limited to, a taste or aroma relating to a fruit, chocolate, vanilla, honey, candy, cocoa, dessert, alcoholic beverage, menthol, mint, wintergreen, herb, or spice. (b) “Cigar” means any roll of tobacco other than a cigarette wrapped entirely or in part in tobacco or any substance containing tobacco and weighing more than three pounds per thousand. (c) “Constituent” means any ingredient, substance, chemical, or compound, other than tobacco, water, or reconstituted tobacco sheet, that is added by the manufacturer to a tobacco product during the processing, manufacture, or packing of the tobacco product. (d) “Consumer” means a person who purchases a tobacco product for consumption and not for sale to another. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 159 ORDINANCE NO. 2017-01 REDLINE VERSION 2 (e) “Electronic smoking device” means an electronic device that can be used to deliver an inhaled dose of nicotine, or other substances. An “electronic smoking device” includes a device that is manufactured, distributed, marketed, or sold as an electronic cigarette, an electronic cigar, an electronic cigarillo, an electronic pipe, an electronic hookah, a vape pen, or a vapor pen. (f) “Enclosed” means all space between a floor and ceiling where the space is closed in on all sides by solid walls or windows that extend from the floor to the ceiling. An enclosed space may have openings for ingress and egress, such as doorways or passageways. An enclosed space includes all areas within that space, such as hallways and areas screened by partitions that do not extend to the ceiling or are not solid. (g) “Flavored tobacco product” means any tobacco product, other than cigarettes as defined by federal law, that contains a constituent that imparts a characterizing flavor. (h) “Little cigar” means any roll of tobacco other than a cigarette wrapped entirely or in part in tobacco or any substance containing tobacco and weighing no more than three pounds per thousand. “Little cigar” includes, but is not limited to, any tobacco product known or labeled as “small cigar” or “little cigar.” (i) “Package” or “packaging” means a pack, box, carton, or container of any kind, or any wrapping, in which a tobacco product is sold or offered for sale to a consumer. (j) “Menthol cigarettes” means cigarettes as defined by federal law, that have a characterizing flavor of menthol, mint, or wintergreen, including cigarettes advertised, labeled, or described by the manufacturer as possessing a menthol characterizing flavor. (k) “Multi-unit residence” means a building that contains two or more dwelling units, including but not limited to apartments, condominiums, senior citizen housing, nursing homes, and single room occupancy hotels. A primary residence with an attached or detached second accessory dwelling unit permitted pursuant to Chapter 82-24 of this code is not a multi-unit residence for purposes of this division. (l) “Multi-unit residence common area” means any indoor or outdoor area of a multi-unit residence accessible to and usable by residents of different dwelling units, including but not limited to halls, lobbies, laundry rooms, common cooking areas, stairwells, outdoor eating areas, play areas, swimming pools, and carports. (m) “Place of employment” means any area under the control of an employer, business, or nonprofit entity that an employee, volunteer, or the public may have cause to enter in the normal course of operations, regardless of the hours of operation. Places of employment include, but are not limited to: indoor work areas; bars; restaurants; at least 80 percent of the guest rooms in any hotel and motel; vehicles used for business June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 160 ORDINANCE NO. 2017-01 REDLINE VERSION 3 purposes; taxis; employee lounges and breakrooms; conference and banquet rooms; bingo and gaming facilities; long-term health care facilities; warehouses; retail or wholesale tobacco shops; and private residences used as licensed child-care or health- care facilities when employees, children or patients are present and during business hours. The places specified in subdivisions (de)(1), (2), (3), (4), (6), and (7), (8), (11), (12), (13) and (14) of Labor Code section 6404.5 are places of employment for purposes of this division and are regulated as specified in this division. The places specified in subdivisions (de)(3), (4), and (5), (9), and (10) of Labor Code section 6404.5 are not places of employment for purposes of this division. (n) “Public place” means any area to which the public is invited or in which the public is permitted. A private residence is not a public place. (o) “Self-service display” means the open display or storage of tobacco products or tobacco paraphernalia in a manner that is physically accessible in any way to the general public without the assistance of a the retailer or employee of the retailer. A vending machine is a form of self-service display. (p) “Service area” means any area designed to be or regularly used by one or more persons to receive or wait to receive a service, enter a public place, or make a transaction, whether or not the service involves the exchange of money. “Service areas” include but are not limited to automatic teller machine waiting areas, bank teller windows, ticket lines, bus stops and taxi stands. (q) “Smoke” means the gases, particles, or vapors released into the air as a result of combustion, electrical ignition, or vaporization of a tobacco product, when the apparent or usual purpose of the combustion, electrical ignition, or vaporization is human inhalation of the tobacco productbyproduct, except when the combusting or vaporizing material contains no tobacco or nicotine or illegal substances, and the purpose of inhalation is solely olfactory, such as, for example, smoke from incense. The term “smoke” includes, but is not limited to, tobacco smoke, electronic smoking device cigarette vapors, and marijuana smoke, and smoke from any illegal substance. "Smoke" excludes incense or similar products inhaled solely for olfactory purposes as long as those products do not contain tobacco or nicotine. (r) “Smoking” means engaging in an act that generates smoke. "Smoking" includes inhaling, exhaling, burning, possessing, holding, or carrying any lighted, heated, or ignited cigar, lighted cigarette, cigarillo, lighted pipe, lighted hookah pipe, operating electronic cigarettesmoking device, or any plant product intended for human inhalationother smoke inhalation device of any kind. "Smoking" includes smoking marijuana for medical purposes. (s) “Tobacco paraphernalia” means any item designed or marketed for the consumption, use, or preparation of tobacco products. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 161 ORDINANCE NO. 2017-01 REDLINE VERSION 4 (t) “Tobacco product” means any of the following: (1) Any substance product containing, made from, or derived from tobacco leafor nicotine that is intended for human consumption, whether smoked, heated, chewed, absorbed, dissolved, inhaled, snorted, sniffed, or ingested by any other means, including but not limited to cigarettes, cigars, little cigars, chewing tobacco, pipe tobacco, hookah tobacco,and snuff, chewing tobacco, dipping tobacco, bidis, blunts, clove cigarettes, or any other preparation of tobacco. (2) Any electronic smoking device. Any product or formulation of matter containing biologically active amounts of nicotine that is manufactured, sold, offered for sale, or otherwise distributed with the expectation that the product or matter will be introduced into the human body, including but not limited to electronic cigarettes. (3) Any component, part, or accessory of a tobacco product, whether or not it is sold separately. (4) The term “Tobacco product” does not include any product that has been specifically approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for sale as a tobacco cessation product or for other therapeutic purposes where the product is marketed and sold solely for that approved purposeuse in treating nicotine dependence or tobacco dependence. (u) “Tobacco retailer” means any individual or entity who sells, offers for sale, or exchanges or offers to exchange for any form of consideration, tobacco, tobacco products, or tobacco paraphernalia. “Tobacco retailing” means the doing of any of these things. This definition is without regard to the quantity of tobacco products or tobacco paraphernalia sold, offered for sale, exchanged, or offered for exchange. (Ords. 2017-01 § 2, 2013-10 § II, 4-9-13, 2010-10 § II, 10-12-10, 2006-66 § 4, 98-43 § 2, 91-44 § 2). (Ord. No. 2013-10, § II, 4-9-13; Ord. No. 2010-10, § II, 10-12-10; Ords. 2006-66 § 4, 98-43 § 2, 91-44 § 2) Chapter 445-4 SECONDHAND SMOKE 445-4.002 County facilities. (a) Smoking is prohibited in all buildings, vehicles, and other enclosed areas occupied by county employees, owned or leased by the county, or otherwise operated by the county. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 162 ORDINANCE NO. 2017-01 REDLINE VERSION 5 (b) Smoking is prohibited in all outdoor areas owned or leased by the county, including parking lots, the grounds of the county's hospital and health clinics, and the grounds of all other buildings owned or leased by the county. (c) Smoking is prohibited on the grounds of the county's jails and county juvenile system facilities to the extent allowed by law. (Ord. No. 2014-06, § II, 6-17-14; Ords. 2006-66 § 5, 91-44 § 2) 445-4.004 Prohibition of smoking. Smoking is prohibited in the following places within the unincorporated area of Contra Costa County: (a) Enclosed places of employment. (b) Enclosed public places. (c) Service areas. (d) All areas within twenty feet of doors, windows, air ducts and ventilation systems of enclosed places of employment, except while passing on the way to another destination. (e) All areas within twenty feet of doors, windows, air ducts and ventilation systems of enclosed public places, except while passing on the way to another destination. (f) The following outdoor areas: (1) Outdoor dining areas at bars and restaurants. (2) Outdoor lounges and outdoor dining areas at places of employment. (3) Public trails and public parks. (4) Public event venues. (g) All multi-unit residence common areas, except that a landlord may designate a portion of an outdoor common area as a smoking area. A designated smoking area of an outdoor common area of a multi-unit residence must not overlap with any area where smoking is otherwise prohibited by local, state, or federal law; must be located at least twenty-five feet in all directions from non-smoking areas; must not include areas used primarily by children; must be no more than twenty-five percent of the total outdoor common area; must have a clearly marked perimeter; and must be identified by conspicuous signs. (h) All areas within twenty feet of doors, windows, air ducts and ventilation systems of multi-unit residences, except while passing on the way to another destination. (i) All outdoor balconies, porches, decks, patios, and carports of multi-unit residences. (j) All dwelling units in any new multi-unit residence that receives a building permit on or after January 1, 2011. (Ord. No. 2010-10, § III, 10-12-10; Ords. 2006-66 § 5, 91-44 § 2) June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 163 ORDINANCE NO. 2017-01 REDLINE VERSION 6 445-4.006 Exceptions. (a) Smoking is permitted at any location within the county unless otherwise prohibited by this code or by state or federal law. (b) Smoking is permitted in up to twenty percent of guest rooms in any hotel or motel, as long as the hotel or motel permanently designates at least eighty percent of its guest rooms as nonsmoking rooms, appropriately signs nonsmoking rooms, and permanently removes ashtrays from these rooms. Smoking rooms shall be segregated from nonsmoking rooms on separate floors, wings or portions of either. Smoking rooms and nonsmoking rooms shall not be interspersed. Nothing in this division requires a hotel or motel to provide smoking rooms and the owner or operator of a hotel or motel may choose to prohibit smoking throughout the property. (Ord. No. 2010-10, § IV, 10-12-10; Ords. 2006-66 § 5, 91-44 § 2) 445-4.008 Posting requirements. (a) "Smoking" or "No Smoking" signs, whichever are appropriate, with letters of not less than one inch in height, or the international "No Smoking" symbol (consisting of a pictorial representation of a burning cigarette enclosed in a red circle with a red bar across it), shall be conspicuously posted in every building or other place where smoking is regulated by this division by the owner, operator, manager or other person having control of the building or other place. (b) Every hotel or motel regulated by this division shall post at its entrance a sign clearly stating that nonsmoking rooms are available, and every patron shall be asked as to his or her preference. (Ords. 2006-66 § 5, 91-44 § 2) 445-4.010 Ashtray placement. No ashtray or other receptacle used for disposing of smoking materials may be placed at any location where smoking is prohibited by this division or otherwise prohibited by law. (Ord. No. 2009-26, § II, 10-20-09) 445-4.012 Disclosure of non-smoking residential units. In a multi-unit residence where units are rented or leased to tenants, the owner and manager of the residence shall do all of the following: (a) Maintain and keep on file at the premises: (1) a list of all designated non-smoking units at the residence; and (2) a floor plan of the residence that identifies the location of all designated non-smoking units, any units where smoking is permitted, and any designated outdoor smoking areas. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 164 ORDINANCE NO. 2017-01 REDLINE VERSION 7 (b) Disclose whether a policy for handling smoking complaints is in effect at the multi-unit residence, and if so, the terms of that policy. (c) Provide a copy of the list and floor plan, and a copy of any policy for addressing smoking complaints in effect at a multi-unit residence, to each tenant along with every new lease or rental agreement for the occupancy of a unit in a multi-unit residence. (Ord. No. 2009-26, § III, 10-20-09) 445-4.014 Required lease terms. (a) Commencing January 1, 2011, every lease and other rental agreement for the occupancy of a dwelling unit in a multi-unit residence that is entered into, renewed, or continued month-to-month must include the terms specified in subsection (b) of this section on the earliest possible date allowed by law after providing any required legal notice. (b) Required Terms. (1) For any multi-unit residence where the landlord has designated separate smoking and non-smoking dwelling units, a clause stating that smoking is prohibited in all dwelling units that have been designated as non-smoking units must be included in the written agreements specified in subsection (a) of this section. (2) For any multi-unit residence where the landlord has prohibited smoking in all dwelling units, a clause stating that smoking is prohibited in all dwelling units must be included in the written agreements specified in subsection (a) of this section. (3) For any new multi-unit residence that receives a building permit on or after January 1, 2011, a clause stating that smoking is prohibited in all dwelling units must be included in the written agreements specified in subsection (a) of this section. (4) A clause stating that it is a material breach of the lease or rental agreement to: (i) violate any law regarding smoking while on the premises; (ii) smoke in a non- smoking dwelling unit; or (iii) smoke in any multi-unit residence common area where smoking is prohibited, must be included in the written agreements specified in subsection (a) of this section. (c) The California Apartment Association's Form 34.0, revised January 2010 and as amended from time to time, may be used to comply with this section. (d) A landlord's failure to enforce any smoking regulation of a lease or agreement on one or more occasions does not constitute a waiver of the lease or agreement provisions required by this section and does not prevent future enforcement of the lease or agreement provisions required by this section. (e) A landlord is not liable under this chapter to any person for a tenant's breach of smoking regulations if: (1) The landlord has fully complied with all provisions of this chapter, and June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 165 ORDINANCE NO. 2017-01 REDLINE VERSION 8 (2) Upon receiving a signed written complaint regarding prohibited smoking, the landlord provides a warning to the offending tenant, stating that the tenant may be evicted if another complaint is received. Upon receiving a second signed, written complaint against the offending tenant, the landlord may evict the tenant, but is not liable for the failure to do so. (Ord. No. 2010-10, § V, 10-12-10) Chapter 445-6 TOBACCO PRODUCTSSALES 445-6.002 Self-service displays. (a) It is unlawful for any person or tobacco retailer to sell, permit to be sold, offer for sale, or display for sale any tobacco product or tobacco paraphernalia by means of self-service display, vending machine, rack, counter-top or shelf that allows self-service sales for any tobacco product or tobacco paraphernalia. (b) All tobacco products and tobacco paraphernalia shall be offered for sale exclusively by means of vendor or employee assistance. Tobacco products and tobacco paraphernalia shall be kept in a locked case that requires employee assistance to retrieve the tobacco products or tobacco paraphernalia. (Ords. 2006-66 § 6, 98-43 § 2). 445-6.004 Distribution of free samples and coupons. It is unlawful for any person, agent, or employee of a person in the business of selling or distributing cigarettes or other tobacco or smoking products to distribute, or direct, authorize, or permit any agent or employee to distribute, any of the following to any person on any public street or sidewalk or in any public park or playground or on any other public ground or in any public building: (a) Any tobacco product; (b) Coupons, certificates, or other written material that may be redeemed for tobacco products without charge. (Ords. 2006-66 § 6, 91-44 § 2) 445-6.006 Flavored tobacco products. It is a violation of this division for any tobacco retailer to sell or offer for sale any flavored tobacco product. (Ord. 2017-01 § 4). June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 166 ORDINANCE NO. 2017-01 REDLINE VERSION 9 445-6.008 Packaging and labeling. No tobacco retailer may sell any tobacco product to any consumer unless that product is sold in the original manufacturer’s packaging intended for sale to consumers and conforms to all applicable federal labeling requirements. (Ord. 2017-01 § 5). 445-6.010 Minimum package size for little cigars and cigars. No tobacco retailer may sell to a consumer any of the following: (a) Any little cigar unless it is sold in a package of at least ten little cigars. (b) Any cigar unless it is sold in a package of at least ten cigars. This subsection does not apply to a cigar that has a price of at least $5 per cigar, including all applicable taxes and fees. (Ord. 2017-01 § 6). 445-6.012 Identification required. No tobacco retailer may sell or transfer a tobacco product or tobacco paraphernalia to a person who reasonably appears to be under the age of 27 years without first examining the identification of the recipient to confirm that the recipient is at least the minimum age under state law to purchase the tobacco product or tobacco paraphernalia. (Ord. 2017-01 § 7). 445-6.014 Menthol cigarettes. It is a violation of this division for any tobacco retailer to sell or offer for sale menthol cigarettes. (Ord. 2017-01 § 8). Chapter 445-8 ENFORCEMENT 445-8.002 Compliance. (a) A person may not smoke in any place where smoking is prohibited by this division. (b) A person who owns, manages, operates or otherwise controls the use of any place where smoking is prohibited by this division may not knowingly or intentionally permit smoking in those places. For purposes of this subsection, a person has acted knowingly or June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 167 ORDINANCE NO. 2017-01 REDLINE VERSION 10 intentionally if he or she has not taken the following actions to prevent smoking by another person: (1) requested that a person who is smoking refrain from smoking; and (2) requested that a person who is smoking leave the place if the person refuses to stop smoking after being asked to stop. This section does not require physically ejecting a person from a place or taking steps to prevent smoking under circumstances that would involve risk of physical harm. (c) The presence or absence of the signs required by Section 445-4.008 is not a defense to the violation of any other provision of this division. (Ords. 2009-26, § IV, 10-20-09, 2006-66 § 7, 91-44 § 2) 445-8.004 Remedies. The county may seek compliance with this division by any remedy allowed under this code, including but not limited to administrative fines (Chapter 14-12), infraction citations (Section 14- 8.008), and any other remedy allowed by law. (Ords. 2006-66 § 7, 2003-01 § 4, 98-43 § 2, 91-44 § 2) 445-8.006 Initiation of enforcement. Any person may initiate enforcement of this division by notifying the director of health services or his or her designee of any violation. (Ords. 2006-66 § 7, 91-44 § 2) 445-8.008 Liability. For purposes of determining liability of persons, firms, corporations, or controlling franchises with business operations in multiple locations, each individual business location shall be deemed a separate entity. (Ords. 2006-66 § 7, 2003-01 § 4, 98-43 § 2). 445-8.010 No retaliation. No person shall retaliate against any employee or applicant for employment because the employee or applicant exercises any rights afforded by this division. (Ords. 2006-66 § 7, 91-44 § 2) 445-8.012 Other applicable laws. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 168 ORDINANCE NO. 2017-01 REDLINE VERSION 11 This division shall not be interpreted or construed to permit smoking where it is otherwise restricted by other applicable laws. (Ords. 2006-66 § 7, 91-44 § 2) Chapter 445-10 TOBACCO RETAILER'S LICENSE 445-10.002 License requirement. (a) It is unlawful for any retailer, individual, or entity to sell or offer for sale any tobacco products conduct tobacco retailing in the unincorporated area of the county without first obtaining and maintaining a valid tobacco retailer’s license from Contra Costa County for each location where these sales are tobacco retailing is conducted. Tobacco retailing by persons on foot and tobacco retailing from vehicles are prohibited. Each day that tobacco products are offered for sale by a tobacco retailer without a tobacco retailer's license is a separate violation. (b) No tobacco retailer’s license will be issued that: (1) Authorizes tobacco retailing at any location other than a fixed location. Tobacco retailing by persons on foot and tobacco retailing from vehicles are prohibited. (2) Authorizes tobacco retailing in a pharmacy. (3) Results in the total number of tobacco retailer’s licenses in the unincorporated area of the county exceeding 90. (c) Each day that tobacco products are offered for sale by a tobacco retailer without a tobacco retailer’s license is a separate violation. (Ords. 2017-01 § 9, 2003-01 § 3, 98-50 § 2). (Ords. 2003-01 § 3, 98-50 § 2). 445-10.004 Enforcement of state law. If a clerk or employee sells a tobacco product or tobacco paraphernalia to a minorany person under the age of 21, the retailer shall immediately notify the appropriate local law enforcement agency of the violation of Penal Code Section 308 for enforcement under that statute. (Ords. 2017-01 § 10, 2003-01 § 3, 98-50 § 2). (Ords. 2003-01 § 3, 98-50 § 2). June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 169 ORDINANCE NO. 2017-01 REDLINE VERSION 12 445-10.006 Definitions. For purposes of this chapter, the following words and phrases have the following meanings: (a) “Director” means the director of Contra Costa health services or his or her designee. (b) “Drug paraphernalia” has the meaning set forth in California Health & Safety Code section 11014.5. (c) “Licensee” means a tobacco retailer who has been issued a tobacco retailer's license in accordance with Section 445-10.010. (d) “Pharmacy” means any retail establishment where the profession of pharmacy is practiced by a pharmacist licensed by the State of California under the Business and Professions Code and where prescription pharmaceuticals are offered for sale, regardless of whether the retail establishment sells other retail goods in addition to prescription pharmaceuticals. (e) “Public health director” means the public health director of Contra Costa County. (f) “Tax collector” means the treasurer-tax collector of Contra Costa County. (g) “Tobacco retailer” has the definition set forth in Section 445-2.006means any retailer, individual, or entity who sells or offers for sale any tobacco products in the unincorporated area of the county. (Ords. 2017-01 § 11, 2003-01 § 3, 98-50 § 2). (Ords. 2003-01 § 3, 98-50 § 2). 445-10.008 Application, issuance and renewal procedure. (a) Application. An application for a tobacco retailer's license shall be submitted to the tax collector in the name of the retailer, individual, or entity proposing to conduct retail tobacco sales on the business premises. The application shall be signed by the retailer, individual or entity or agent with written authority to act for same. All applications shall be submitted on a form available from the tax collector and shall contain the following information: (1) The name, address, and telephone number of the applicant; (2) The business name, address, and telephone number of each establishment where tobacco is to be sold. (b) Issuance and Renewal. All tobacco retailer's licenses will be issued and due for renewal effective July 1st and will expire on the subsequent June 30. Licensees must apply for June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 170 ORDINANCE NO. 2017-01 REDLINE VERSION 13 renewal before the tobacco retailer's license expires. Applicants for renewal must follow the application procedures set forth in subdivision (a). (Ords. 2003-01 § 3, 98-50 § 2). 445-10.010 Issuance, display, and transfer of license. (a) Upon receipt of a completed application for a tobacco retailer's license, including payment of a fee pursuant to Section 445-10.012, the tax collector will issue a tobacco retailer's license, unless any of the following grounds for denial exist: (1) The application is incomplete or inaccurate; (2) The application seeks authorization for tobacco retailing by a person or location for which a suspension is in effect under Section 445-10.018; (3) The application seeks authorization for tobacco retailing that is an unlawful use of land, building or structure contrary to Divisions 82 or 84 of this code. (4) Failure to pay an outstanding fine. (b) Each licensee must prominently display the tobacco retailer's license at the location where tobacco retail sales are conducted. (c) The tobacco retailer's license is nontransferable. If there is a change in location, a new tobacco retailer's license will be issued for the new address upon receipt of an application for change of location. The new tobacco retailer's license will retain the same expiration date as the previous one. (Ords. 2003-01 § 3, 98-50 § 2). 445-10.012 License fee. A tobacco retailer's license will not be issued unless a fee is paid. The fee for a tobacco retailer's license shall reflect the reasonable cost of providing services necessary to the licensing activities of this chapter. The fees prescribed by this section are regulatory permit fees and do not constitute a tax for revenue purposes. The fee shall be in the amount established annually by the board of supervisors in the Contra Costa County health services department's fee schedule. (Ords. 2003-01 § 3, 98-50 § 2). 445-10.014 Business license. If a tobacco retailer's license is denied, revoked, or suspended pursuant to this chapter, the holder of a valid business license issued pursuant to Chapter 64-14 of this code may nevertheless carry on all lawful aspects of his or her business, other than the sale or offering for sale of tobacco products, unless otherwise prohibited. (Ords. 2003-01 § 3, 98-50 § 2). June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 171 ORDINANCE NO. 2017-01 REDLINE VERSION 14 445-10.016 License revocation. (a) Grounds for Revocation. A tobacco retailer's license may be revoked on any of the following grounds: (1) One or more of the grounds for denial of a tobacco retailer's license under Section 445-10.010 existed either when a license application was made or before the tobacco retailer's license was issued; (2) The tobacco retailer's license fee is unpaid; (3) The tobacco retailer's license has been transferred in violation of Section 445- 10.010. (b) Notice of Revocation Hearing. If any grounds for revocation exist, the director may issue a notice of revocation hearing. A notice of revocation hearing will be served to a tobacco retailer as specified in Section 445-10.022 and will include all of the following information: (1) The address or a definite description of the location where the tobacco retailer's license is issued; (2) The grounds for revocation; (3) The date of the revocation hearing before the public health director. The notice of revocation hearing will set the hearing date no sooner than twenty days and no later than forty-five days following the date the notice of revocation hearing is served. (c) Revocation Hearing. A tobacco retailer's license may be revoked by the public health director after a tobacco retailer's license revocation hearing. At the hearing, the licensee will be given the opportunity to testify and to present evidence concerning the grounds set forth in the notice of revocation hearing. After considering the testimony and evidence submitted at the hearing, the public health director will issue a written decision to revoke or not revoke the license and will list in the decision the reason or reasons for that decision. The written decision will be served as specified in Section 445-10.022. A revocation is without prejudice to the filing of a new application for a tobacco retailer's license. (d) Revocation Appeal. The decision of the public health director to revoke a tobacco retailer's license is appealable to the board of supervisors and will be heard at a noticed public hearing as provided in Chapter 14-4 of this code. (e) Final Order. The tobacco retailer's license revocation becomes a final administrative order at one of the following times: (1) On the date of the revocation hearing, if a tobacco retailer fails to appear at a scheduled revocation hearing; (2) On the date the public health director's decision is served, if a tobacco retailer fails to file a written appeal to the board of supervisors within the time specified; (3) On the date of the appeal hearing, if a tobacco retailer fails to appear at a scheduled appeal hearing before the board of supervisors; June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 172 ORDINANCE NO. 2017-01 REDLINE VERSION 15 (4) On the date of the decision by the board of supervisors, if a tobacco retailer appears at a scheduled appeal hearing before the board of supervisors. (Ords. 2003-01 § 3, 98-50 § 2). 445-10.018 License suspension. (a) Grounds for Suspension. A tobacco retailer's license may be suspended for any violation of this division, Division 440 of this code, or any state or federal tobacco-related laws, any state or federal law regulating controlled substances or drug paraphernalia, or any state or local law regulating advertising and signage on retailer’s window space. (b) Notice of Suspension Hearing. If any grounds for suspension exist, the director may issue a notice of suspension hearing. The notice of suspension hearing will be served to a tobacco retailer as specified in Section 445-10.022 and will include all of the following information: (1) The date of the violation; (2) The address or other description of the location where the violation occurred; (3) The code section(s) violated, or applicable state or federal law violated, and a description of the violation; (4) The time period of the tobacco retailer's license suspension; (5) The date of the suspension hearing before the public health director. The notice of suspension hearing will set the hearing date no sooner than twenty days and no later than forty-five days following the date the notice of suspension hearing is served. (c) Suspension Hearing. A tobacco retailer's license may be suspended by the public health director after a tobacco retailer's license suspension hearing. At the hearing, the licensee will be given the opportunity to testify and to present evidence concerning the notice of suspension hearing. After considering the testimony and evidence submitted at the hearing, the public health director will issue a written decision to suspend or not suspend the tobacco retailer's license. The public health director will list in the decision the reason or reasons for the decision and will list the time period of the tobacco retailer's license suspension, if applicable. The written decision will be served as specified in Section 445- 10.022. (d) Time Period of License Suspension. (1) A tobacco retailer's license suspension may be up to thirty days for a first violation; (2) A tobacco retailer's license suspension may be up to ninety days for a second violation occurring within five years twenty-four months of the first violation; (3) A tobacco retailer's license suspension may be up to one year for each subsequent violation occurring within five years twenty-four months of the most recent prior determination. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 173 ORDINANCE NO. 2017-01 REDLINE VERSION 16 (e) Suspension Appeal. The decision of the public health director to suspend a tobacco retailer's license is appealable to the board of supervisors and will be heard at a noticed public hearing as provided in Chapter 14-4 of this code. (f) Final Order. The tobacco retailer's license suspension becomes a final administrative order at one of the following times: (1) On the date of the suspension hearing, if a tobacco retailer fails to appear at a scheduled suspension hearing; (2) On the date the public health director's decision is served, if a tobacco retailer fails to file a written appeal to the board of supervisors within the time specified; (3) On the date of the appeal hearing, if a tobacco retailer fails to appear at a scheduled appeal hearing before the board of supervisors; (4) On the date of the decision by the board of supervisors, if a tobacco retailer appears at a scheduled appeal hearing before the board of supervisors. (g) During a period of license suspension, the tobacco retailer must remove from public view all tobacco products. (Ords. 2017-01 § 12, 2003-01 § 3, 98-50 § 2). (Ords. 2003-01 § 3, 98-50 § 2). 445-10.020 Enforcement. The county may seek compliance with this chapter by any remedy allowed under this code, including, but not limited to, revocation (Section 445-10.016), suspension (Section 445-10.018), administrative fines (Chapter 14-12), criminal citations (Section 14-8.008), and any other remedy allowed by law. (Ords. 2003-01 § 3, 98-50 § 2). 445-10.022 Service. All notices or decisions required to be served by this chapter will be served either by the method specified in subsection (a) or by the method specified in subsection (b). The failure of a person to receive a properly addressed service shall not affect the validity of the proceedings. (a) Certified mail. Certified mail will be addressed to the tobacco retailer at the address shown on the license application. Service is deemed complete upon the deposit of the notice or decision, postage pre-paid, in the United States mail. Simultaneously, the same notice or decision may be sent by regular mail. If a notice or decision sent by certified mail is returned unsigned, then service is deemed effective pursuant to regular mail on the date mailed. (b) Personal service. Personal service is deemed complete on the date the notice or decision is personally served. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 174 ORDINANCE NO. 2017-01 REDLINE VERSION 17 (Ords. 2003-01 § 3, 98-50 § 2). 445-10.024 Display and advertisement without license. (a) A tobacco retailer without a valid tobacco retailer’s license, including a tobacco retailer whose license has been suspended or revoked, shall keep all tobacco products and tobacco paraphernalia out of public view. The public display of tobacco products or tobacco paraphernalia while a license is suspended or revoked is a violation of Section 445-10.002. (b) A tobacco retailer without a valid tobacco retailer’s license, including a tobacco retailer whose license has been suspended or revoked, may not display any advertisement relating to tobacco products or tobacco paraphernalia that promotes the sale or distribution of these products from the tobacco retailer’s location or that could lead a reasonable consumer to believe that these products can be obtained at that location. (Ord. 2017-01 § 13). June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 175 ORDINANCE NO. 2017-01 TOBACCO PRODUCT AND RETAIL SALES CONTROL The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors ordains as follows (omitting the parenthetical footnotes from the official text of the enacted or amended provisions of the County Ordinance Code): SECTION I. SUMMARY. This ordinance amends Division 445 of the County Ordinance Code to establish restrictions on the retail sales of emerging tobacco products, such as electronic smoking devices and flavored tobacco products, and to reduce the accessability and exposure of tobacco products to minors and the public generally. SECTION II. Section 445-2.006 of the County Ordinance Code is amended to read: 445-2.006 Definitions. For the purposes of this division, the following words and phrases have the following meanings: (a) “Characterizing flavor” means a distinguishable taste or aroma imparted by a tobacco product or any byproduct produced by the tobacco product that is perceivable by an ordinary consumer by either the sense of taste or smell, other than the taste or aroma of tobacco. A “characterizing flavor” includes, but is not limited to, a taste or aroma relating to a fruit, chocolate, vanilla, honey, candy, cocoa, dessert, alcoholic beverage, menthol, mint, wintergreen, herb, or spice. (b) “Cigar” means any roll of tobacco other than a cigarette wrapped entirely or in part in tobacco or any substance containing tobacco and weighing more than three pounds per thousand. (c) “Constituent” means any ingredient, substance, chemical, or compound, other than tobacco, water, or reconstituted tobacco sheet, that is added by the manufacturer to a tobacco product during the processing, manufacture, or packing of the tobacco product. (d) “Consumer” means a person who purchases a tobacco product for consumption and not for sale to another. (e) “Electronic smoking device” means an electronic device that can be used to deliver an inhaled dose of nicotine, or other substances. An “electronic smoking device” includes a device that is manufactured, distributed, marketed, or sold as an electronic cigarette, an electronic cigar, an electronic cigarillo, an electronic pipe, an electronic hookah, a vape pen, or a vapor pen. ORDINANCE NO. 2017-01 1 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 176 (f) “Enclosed” means all space between a floor and ceiling where the space is closed in on all sides by solid walls or windows that extend from the floor to the ceiling. An enclosed space may have openings for ingress and egress, such as doorways or passageways. An enclosed space includes all areas within that space, such as hallways and areas screened by partitions that do not extend to the ceiling or are not solid. (g) “Flavored tobacco product” means any tobacco product, other than cigarettes as defined by federal law, that contains a constituent that imparts a characterizing flavor. (h) “Little cigar” means any roll of tobacco other than a cigarette wrapped entirely or in part in tobacco or any substance containing tobacco and weighing no more than three pounds per thousand. “Little cigar” includes, but is not limited to, any tobacco product known or labeled as “small cigar” or “little cigar.” (i) “Package” or “packaging” means a pack, box, carton, or container of any kind, or any wrapping, in which a tobacco product is sold or offered for sale to a consumer. (j) “Menthol cigarettes” means cigarettes as defined by federal law, that have a characterizing flavor of menthol, mint, or wintergreen, including cigarettes advertised, labeled, or described by the manufacturer as possessing a menthol characterizing flavor. (k) “Multi-unit residence” means a building that contains two or more dwelling units, including but not limited to apartments, condominiums, senior citizen housing, nursing homes, and single room occupancy hotels. A primary residence with an attached or detached accessory dwelling unit permitted pursuant to Chapter 82-24 of this code is not a multi-unit residence for purposes of this division. (l) “Multi-unit residence common area” means any indoor or outdoor area of a multi-unit residence accessible to and usable by residents of different dwelling units, including but not limited to halls, lobbies, laundry rooms, common cooking areas, stairwells, outdoor eating areas, play areas, swimming pools, and carports. (m) “Place of employment” means any area under the control of an employer, business, or nonprofit entity that an employee, volunteer, or the public may have cause to enter in the normal course of operations, regardless of the hours of operation. Places of employment include, but are not limited to: indoor work areas; bars; restaurants; at least 80 percent of the guest rooms in any hotel and motel; vehicles used for business purposes; taxis; employee lounges and breakrooms; conference and banquet rooms; bingo and gaming facilities; long-term health care facilities; warehouses; retail or wholesale tobacco shops; and private residences used as licensed child-care or health-care facilities when employees, children or patients are present and during business hours. The places specified in subdivisions (e)(1), (2), (6), and (7) of Labor Code section 6404.5 are places ORDINANCE NO. 2017-01 2 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 177 of employment for the purposes of this division and are regulated as specified in this division. The places specified in subdivisions (e)(3), (4), and (5) of Labor Code section 6404.5 are not places of employment for the purposes of this division. (n) “Public place” means any area to which the public is invited or in which the public is permitted. A private residence is not a public place. (o) “Self-service display” means the open display or storage of tobacco products or tobacco paraphernalia in a manner that is physically accessible in any way to the general public without the assistance of the retailer or employee of the retailer. A vending machine is a form of self-service display. (p) “Service area” means any area designed to be or regularly used by one or more persons to receive or wait to receive a service, enter a public place, or make a transaction, whether or not the service involves the exchange of money. “Service areas” include but are not limited to automatic teller machine waiting areas, bank teller windows, ticket lines, bus stops and taxi stands. (q) “Smoke” means the gases, particles, or vapors released into the air as a result of combustion, electrical ignition, or vaporization when the apparent or usual purpose of the combustion, electrical ignition, or vaporization is human inhalation of the byproducts, except when the combusting or vaporizing material contains no tobacco or nicotine or illegal substances, and the purpose of inhalation is solely olfactory, such as, for example, smoke from incense. The term “smoke” includes, but is not limited to, tobacco smoke, electronic smoking device vapors, marijuana smoke, and smoke from any illegal substance. (r) “Smoking” means inhaling, exhaling, burning, or carrying any lighted, heated, or ignited cigar, cigarette, cigarillo, pipe, hookah, electronic smoking device, or any plant product intended for human inhalation. (s) “Tobacco paraphernalia” means any item designed or marketed for the consumption, use, or preparation of tobacco products. (t) “Tobacco product” means any of the following: (1) Any product containing, made from, or derived from tobacco or nicotine that is intended for human consumption, whether smoked, heated, chewed, absorbed, dissolved, inhaled, snorted, sniffed, or ingested by any other means, including but not limited to cigarettes, cigars, little cigars, chewing tobacco, pipe tobacco, and snuff. ORDINANCE NO. 2017-01 3 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 178 (2) Any electronic smoking device. (3) Any component, part, or accessory of a tobacco product, whether or not it is sold separately. (4) “Tobacco product” does not include any product that has been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for sale as a tobacco cessation product or for other therapeutic purposes where the product is marketed and sold solely for that approved purpose. (u) “Tobacco retailer” means any individual or entity who sells, offers for sale, or exchanges or offers to exchange for any form of consideration, tobacco, tobacco products, or tobacco paraphernalia. “Tobacco retailing” means the doing of any of these things. This definition is without regard to the quantity of tobacco products or tobacco paraphernalia sold, offered for sale, exchanged, or offered for exchange. (Ords. 2017-01 § 2, 2013-10 § II, 4- 9-13, 2010-10 § II, 10-12-10, 2006-66 § 4, 98-43 § 2, 91-44 § 2). SECTION III. The title of Chapter 445-6 is amended to read: Chapter 445-6 TOBACCO SALES SECTION IV. Section 445-6.006 is added to the County Ordinance Code, to read: 445-6.006 Flavored tobacco products. It is a violation of this division for any tobacco retailer to sell or offer for sale any flavored tobacco product. (Ord. 2017-01 § 4). SECTION V. Section 445-6.008 is added to the County Ordinance Code, to read: 445-6.008 Packaging and labeling. No tobacco retailer may sell any tobacco product to any consumer unless that product is sold in the original manufacturer’s packaging intended for sale to consumers and conforms to all applicable federal labeling requirements. (Ord. 2017-01 § 5). SECTION VI. Section 445-6.010 is added to the County Ordinance Code, to read: 445-6.010 Minimum package size for little cigars and cigars. No tobacco retailer may sell to a consumer any of the following: (a) Any little cigar unless it is sold in a package of at least ten little cigars. (b) Any cigar unless it is sold in a package of at least ten cigars. This subsection does not apply to a cigar that has a price of at least $5 per cigar, including all applicable taxes and ORDINANCE NO. 2017-01 4 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 179 fees. (Ord. 2017-01 § 6). SECTION VII. Section 445-6.012 is added to the County Ordinance Code, to read: 445-6.012 Identification required. No tobacco retailer may sell or transfer a tobacco product or tobacco paraphernalia to a person who reasonably appears to be under the age of 27 years without first examining the identification of the recipient to confirm that the recipient is at least the minimum age under state law to purchase the tobacco product or tobacco paraphernalia. (Ord. 2017-01 § 7). SECTION VIII. Section 445-6.014 is added to the County Ordinance Code, to read: 445-6.014 Menthol cigarettes. It is a violation of this division for any tobacco retailer to sell or offer for sale menthol cigarettes. (Ord. 2017-01 § 8). SECTION IX. Section 445-10.002 of the County Ordinance Code is amended to read: 445-10.002 License requirement. (a) It is unlawful for any retailer, individual, or entity to conduct tobacco retailing in the unincorporated area of the county without first obtaining and maintaining a valid tobacco retailer’s license from Contra Costa County for each location where tobacco retailing is conducted. (b) No tobacco retailer’s license will be issued that: (1) Authorizes tobacco retailing at any location other than a fixed location. Tobacco retailing by persons on foot and tobacco retailing from vehicles are prohibited. (2) Authorizes tobacco retailing in a pharmacy. (3) Results in the total number of tobacco retailer’s licenses in the unincorporated area of the county exceeding 90. (c) Each day that tobacco products are offered for sale by a tobacco retailer without a tobacco retailer’s license is a separate violation. (Ords. 2017-01 § 9, 2003-01 § 3, 98-50 § 2). SECTION X. Section 445-10.004 of the County Ordinance Code is amended to read: 445-10.004 Enforcement of state law. If a clerk or employee sells a tobacco product or tobacco paraphernalia to any person under the age of 21, the retailer shall immediately notify the appropriate local law enforcement agency of the violation of Penal Code section 308 for ORDINANCE NO. 2017-01 5 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 180 enforcement under that statute. (Ords. 2017-01 § 10, 2003-01 § 3, 98-50 § 2). SECTION XI. Section 445-10.006 of the County Ordinance Code is amended to read: 445-10.006 Definitions. For purposes of this chapter, the following words and phrases have the following meanings: (a) “Director” means the director of Contra Costa health services or his or her designee. (b) “Drug paraphernalia” has the meaning set forth in California Health & Safety Code section 11014.5. (c) “Licensee” means a tobacco retailer who has been issued a tobacco retailer's license in accordance with Section 445-10.010. (d) “Pharmacy” means any retail establishment where the profession of pharmacy is practiced by a pharmacist licensed by the State of California under the Business and Professions Code and where prescription pharmaceuticals are offered for sale, regardless of whether the retail establishment sells other retail goods in addition to prescription pharmaceuticals. (e) “Public health director” means the public health director of Contra Costa County. (f) “Tax collector” means the treasurer-tax collector of Contra Costa County. (g) “Tobacco retailer” has the definition set forth in Section 445-2.006. (Ords. 2017-01 § 11, 2003-01 § 3, 98-50 § 2). SECTION XII. Section 445-10.018 of the County Ordinance Code is amended to read: 445-10.018 License suspension. (a) Grounds for Suspension. A tobacco retailer's license may be suspended for any violation of this division, any state or federal tobacco-related laws, any state or federal law regulating controlled substances or drug paraphernalia, or any state or local law regulating advertising and signage on retailer’s window space. (b) Notice of Suspension Hearing. If any grounds for suspension exist, the director may issue a notice of suspension hearing. The notice of suspension hearing will be served to a tobacco retailer as specified in Section 445-10.022 and will include all of the following information: ORDINANCE NO. 2017-01 6 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 181 (1) The date of the violation. (2) The address or other description of the location where the violation occurred. (3) The code section(s) violated, or applicable state or federal law violated, and a description of the violation. (4) The time period of the tobacco retailer's license suspension. (5) The date of the suspension hearing before the public health director. The notice of suspension hearing will set the hearing date no sooner than twenty days and no later than forty-five days following the date the notice of suspension hearing is served. (c) Suspension Hearing. A tobacco retailer's license may be suspended by the public health director after a tobacco retailer's license suspension hearing. At the hearing, the licensee will be given the opportunity to testify and to present evidence concerning the notice of suspension hearing. After considering the testimony and evidence submitted at the hearing, the public health director will issue a written decision to suspend or not suspend the tobacco retailer's license. The public health director will list in the decision the reason or reasons for the decision and will list the time period of the tobacco retailer's license suspension, if applicable. The written decision will be served as specified in Section 445- 10.022. (d) Time Period of License Suspension. (1) A tobacco retailer's license suspension may be up to thirty days for a first violation. (2) A tobacco retailer's license suspension may be up to ninety days for a second violation occurring within five years of the first violation. (3) A tobacco retailer's license suspension may be up to one year for each subsequent violation occurring within five years of the most recent prior determination. (e) Suspension Appeal. The decision of the public health director to suspend a tobacco retailer's license is appealable to the board of supervisors and will be heard at a noticed public hearing as provided in Chapter 14-4 of this code. (f) Final Order. The tobacco retailer's license suspension becomes a final administrative order at one of the following times: ORDINANCE NO. 2017-01 7 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 182 (1) On the date of the suspension hearing, if a tobacco retailer fails to appear at a scheduled suspension hearing. (2) On the date the public health director's decision is served, if a tobacco retailer fails to file a written appeal to the board of supervisors within the time specified. (3) On the date of the appeal hearing, if a tobacco retailer fails to appear at a scheduled appeal hearing before the board of supervisors. (4) On the date of the decision by the board of supervisors, if a tobacco retailer appears at a scheduled appeal hearing before the board of supervisors. (Ords. 2017-01 § 12, 2003-01 § 3, 98-50 § 2). SECTION XIII. Section 445-10.024 is added to the County Ordinance Code, to read: 445-10.024 Display and advertisement without license. (a) A tobacco retailer without a valid tobacco retailer’s license, including a tobacco retailer whose license has been suspended or revoked, shall keep all tobacco products and tobacco paraphernalia out of public view. The public display of tobacco products or tobacco paraphernalia while a license is suspended or revoked is a violation of Section 445-10.002. (b) A tobacco retailer without a valid tobacco retailer’s license, including a tobacco retailer whose license has been suspended or revoked, may not display any advertisement relating to tobacco products or tobacco paraphernalia that promotes the sale or distribution of these products from the tobacco retailer’s location or that could lead a reasonable consumer to believe that these products can be obtained at that location. (Ord. 2017-01 § 13). /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// ORDINANCE NO. 2017-01 8 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 183 SECTION XIV. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage, and within 15 days after passage shall be published once with the names of supervisors voting for or against it in the Contra Costa Times, a newspaper published in this County. PASSED on ___________________________, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: DAVID J. TWA, _____________________________ Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Board Chair and County Administrator By: ______________________[SEAL] Deputy KCK: H:\Client Matters\2017\HS\Ordinance No. 2017-01 Tobacco Product and Retail Sales Control.wpd ORDINANCE NO. 2017-01 9 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 184 ORDINANCE NO. 2017-10 TOBACCO RETAILING BUSINESSES The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors ordains as follows (omitting the parenthetical footnotes from the official text of the enacted or amended provisions of the County Ordinance Code): SECTION I. SUMMARY. This ordinance adds Chapter 88-26 to the County Ordinance Code to regulate the location of tobacco retailing businesses and to prohibit the establishment of hookah lounges, vapor lounges, and significant tobacco retailing businesses. SECTION II. Chapter 88-26 is added to the County Ordinance Code, to read: Chapter 88-26 TOBACCO RETAILING BUSINESSES Article 88-26.2 General 88-26.202 Purpose. The primary purposes of this chapter are to restrict the concentration of tobacco retailing businesses in any one area; to minimize the availability of tobacco products to minors by prohibiting tobacco retailing businesses from locating near schools and other youth- sensitive areas; and to prohibit hookah lounges, vapor lounges, and significant tobacco retailing businesses, which have a deleterious effect upon adjacent areas. (Ord. 2017-10 § 2). 88-26.204 Definitions. For the purposes of this chapter, the following words and phrases have the following meanings: (a) “Hookah lounge,” also referred to as a “hookah bar,” means any facility, building, structure, or location where customers smoke tobacco or other substances through one or more hookah pipes (also commonly referred to as a hookah or waterpipe). (b) “Significant tobacco retailing business” means any tobacco retailing business for which 20 percent or more of floor or display area is devoted to tobacco products, tobacco paraphernalia, or both. (c) “Tobacco paraphernalia” and “tobacco product” have the definitions set forth in Section 445-2.006. (d) “Tobacco retailing” means selling, offering for sale, or exchanging or offering to exchange for any form of consideration, tobacco, tobacco products, or tobacco ORDINANCE NO. 2017-10 1 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 185 paraphernalia. This definition is without regard to the quantity of tobacco products or tobacco paraphernalia sold, offered for sale, exchanged, or offered for exchange. (e) “Tobacco retailing business” means any facility, building, structure, or location that is used, whether as a primary use or as an ancillary use, for tobacco retailing. (f) “Tobacco retailer’s license” means a license issued in accordance with Section 445- 10.010. (g) “Vapor lounge,” also referred to as a “vape lounge,” “vapor bar,” “electronic smoking device bar,” or “electronic smoking device lounge,” means any facility, building, structure, or location where customers use one or more electronic smoking devices, as defined in Section 445-2.006, to deliver an inhaled dose of nicotine or other substance within the establishment. (Ord. 2017-10 § 2). Article 88-26.4 Tobacco Retailing Business Locations 88-26.402 Restrictions. In land use districts where tobacco retailing regulated by this chapter would otherwise be a permitted use, it is unlawful to establish or maintain a tobacco retailing business if the location of the business is: (a) Within 500 feet of any parcel occupied by any other tobacco retailing business; or (b) Within 1,000 feet of any parcel occupied by a public or private school, playground, park, or library. For the purposes of this section, distance is measured by the shortest line connecting any point on the property line of the parcel on which the tobacco retailing business will be established or maintained to any point on the property line of the other parcel. (Ord. 2017-10 § 2). 88-26.404 Establishment. For the purposes of this article, the establishment of a tobacco retailing business includes the opening of a tobacco retailing business as a new business, the relocation of an existing tobacco retailing business to a different location, or the conversion of an existing retail business location to a tobacco retailing business. (Ord. 2017-10 § 2). 88-26.406 Nonconforming tobacco retailing use. (a) For the purposes of this chapter, each of the following is a nonconforming tobacco retailing use: (1) Any lawful use of any land or building for tobacco retailing, existing at the time ORDINANCE NO. 2017-10 2 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 186 this chapter becomes effective, that does not conform to the provisions of Section 88-26.402. (2) Any lawful use of any land or building for tobacco retailing that, after this chapter becomes effective, does not conform to the provisions of Section 88-26.402(b) due to the lawful establishment of a public or private school, playground, park, or library. (b) A nonconforming tobacco retailing use is not a violation of this chapter, except as otherwise provided in subsection (c). If a nonconforming tobacco retailing use is continued after the effective date of this chapter, all applicable permits and licenses, including a tobacco retailer’s license, must be maintained in full force and effect, and the nonconforming tobacco retailing use may not be increased, enlarged, or expanded. (c) A nonconforming tobacco retailing use must be discontinued if a change of ownership occurs 10 years or more after the date this chapter becomes effective, or 10 years or more after the date the use becomes nonconforming, whichever date is later. For the purposes of this subsection, a “change of ownership” occurs when: 50 percent or more of the ownership interest in the tobacco retailing business is transferred to another person or entity within a 12-month period; or, if the owner of the tobacco retailing business is a corporation, 25 percent or more of the stock interest in the corporate owner of the tobacco retailing business is transferred to another person or entity within a 12-month period. (Ord. 2017-10 § 2). 88-26.408 Compliance with code provisions. A tobacco retailing business allowed under this chapter may only be established and maintained in full compliance with Division 445 of this code. (Ord. 2017-10 § 2). Article 88-26.6 Hookah Lounges, Vapor Lounges, and Significant Tobacco Retailing Businesses 88-26.602 Hookah lounges prohibited. A hookah lounge may not be established in any land use district. (Ord. 2017-10 § 2). 88-26.604 Vapor lounges prohibited. A vapor lounge may not be established in any land use district. (Ord. 2017-10 § 2). 88-26.606 Significant tobacco retailing businesses prohibited. A significant tobacco retailing business may not be established in any land use district. (Ord. 2017-10 § 2). /// /// ORDINANCE NO. 2017-10 3 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 187 SECTION III. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage, and within 15 days after passage shall be published once with the names of supervisors voting for or against it in the Contra Costa Times, a newspaper published in this County. PASSED on ___________________________, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: DAVID J. TWA, _____________________________ Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Board Chair and County Administrator By: ______________________[SEAL] Deputy KCK: H:\Client Matters\2017\HS\Ordinance No. 2017-10 Tobacco Retailing Businesses.wpd ORDINANCE NO. 2017-10 4 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 188 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 189 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 190 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 191 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 192 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 193 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 194 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 195 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 196 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 197 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 198 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 199 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 200 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 201 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 202 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 203 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 204 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 205 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 206 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 207 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 208 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 209 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 210 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 211 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 212 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 213 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 214 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 215 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 216 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 217 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 218 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 219 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 220 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 221 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 222 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 223 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 224 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 225 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 226 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 227 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 228 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 229 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 230 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 231 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 232 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 233 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 234 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 235 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 236 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 237 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 238 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 239 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 240 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 241 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 242 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 243 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 244 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 245 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 246 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 247 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 248 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 249 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 250 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 251 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 252 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 253 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 254 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 255 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 256 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 257 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 258 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 259 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 260 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 261 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 262 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 263 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 264 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 265 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 266 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 267 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 268 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 269 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 270 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 271 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 272 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 273 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 274 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 275 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 276 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 277 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 278 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 279 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 280 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 281 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 282 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 283 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 284 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 285 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 286 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 287 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 288 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 289 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 290 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 291 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 292 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 293 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 294 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 295 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 296 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 297 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 298 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 299 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 300 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 301 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 302 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 303 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 304 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 305 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 306 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 307 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 308 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 309 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 310 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 311 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 312 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 313 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 314 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 315 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 316 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 317 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 318 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 319 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 320 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 321 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 322 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 323 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 324 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 325 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 326 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 327 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 328 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 329 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 330 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 331 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 332 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 333 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 334 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 335 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 336 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 337 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 338 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 339 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 340 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 341 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 342 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 343 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 344 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 345 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 346 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 347 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 348 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 349 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 350 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 351 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 352 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 353 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 354 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 355 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 356 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 357 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 358 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 359 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 360 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 361 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 362 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 363 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 364 RECOMMENDATION(S): Acting as the Governing Board to the Successor Agency of the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency (the "Successor Agency"): 1. ADOPT Resolution No. 2017/215 that approves the form of the preliminary official statement for the Successor Agency Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds, Series 2017A and 2017B, (together the "Refunding Bonds") (the "Preliminary Official Statement") and AUTHORIZE the Chair of the Board of Supervisors, the County Administrator, the Director of Conservation and Development, the Deputy Director of Conservation and Development for Policy Planning, the Assistant Deputy Director of Conservation and Development, or the Community Development Bond Program Manager (each a "Designated Officer") to approve changes or additions to the Preliminary Official Statement and deem final the Preliminary Official Statement prior to its distribution. 2. AUTHORIZE and DIRECT Stifel, Nicolaus & Company Incorporated, the underwriter for the Refunding Bonds, to distribute the Preliminary Official Statement to prospective purchasers of the bonds. 3. AUTHORIZE and DIRECT the Designated Officers to assist disclosure counsel in causing the Preliminary Official Statement to be brought into the form of a final official statement (the "Final Official Statement"), and to execute the Final Official Statement and a statement that the facts in the Final Official Statement were at the time of the sale of the Refunding Bonds true and correct, and did not contain any untrue statement or material fact. 4. AUTHORIZE the Final Official Statement, when prepared for distribution, APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Kristen Lackey, 925-674-7888 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: D. 4 To:Board of Supervisors From:John Kopchik, Director, Conservation & Development Department Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:Preliminary Official Statement for Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds, Series 2017A and 2017B June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 365 RECOMMENDATION(S): (CONT'D) to actual purchasers of the Refunding Bonds. 5. AUTHORIZE and DIRECT the Designated Officers to execute and deliver a Continuing Disclosure Certificate, the form of which is an exhibit to the Preliminary Official Statement. 6. AUTHORIZE the Designated Officers to approve modifications to the documents related to the Refunding Bonds to allow for municipal bond insurance and/or a reserve fund surety bond or insurance policy, if such action will result in lower interest cost to the Successor Agency. The bond insurance or surety bond will be purchased with bond proceeds. FISCAL IMPACT: The issuance of Refunding Bonds at current market rates is expected to save over $25 million in debt service payments over the next 19 years. The savings will be distributed among the various taxing entities within the former redevelopment project areas. BACKGROUND: On April 25, 2017, the Board of Supervisors, acting as the Governing Board of the Successor Agency to the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency (the "Successor Agency"), adopted Resolution No. 2017/147 that authorized the issuance and sale of two series of tax allocation refunding bonds (the "Refunding Bonds") to refinance twelve outstanding loan obligations of the former Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency and, thereby, refund five series of County of Contra Costa Public Finance Authority Tax Allocation Bonds, and approved related documents and actions. On May 4, 2017, the Contra Costa County Oversight Board adopted Resolution No. 2017-3 that approved the issuance of the Refunding Bonds by the Successor Agency. The County's independent registered municipal advisor, Montague DeRose and Associates, has determined that the Refunding Bonds will achieve a debt service savings within the parameters of California Health and Safety Code 34177.5(a)(1) and prepared a savings analysis (the "Debt Service Savings Analysis"). Following the Board of Supervisors and Oversight Board actions, Successor Agency staff submitted a request along with the Debt Service Savings Analysis to the California Department of Finance (the "DOF") seeking its approval of the Oversight Board Resolution 2017-3. The DOF has until July 9, 2017, to respond to the Successor Agency. In order to issue the Refunding Bonds, the bond underwriter, Stifel, Nicolaus & Company (the "Underwriter"), must provide a Preliminary Official Statement to prospective bond purchasers. The Preliminary Official Statement provides information regarding the Refunding Bonds, including information about the revenue for repayment of the bonds and potential risks that could impact the revenue. The Successor Agency has also met with Standard and Poor's representatives and has requested a credit rating for the Refunding Bonds. Standard and Poor's is expected to provide the credit rating following the completion of the DOF review of the Refunding Bonds, and its approval of the Oversight Board Resolution 2017-3. Subsequent to the Underwriter pricing the bonds, the Designated Officers will assist the County's disclosure counsel in bringing the Preliminary Official Statement into the form of the Final Official Statement, including finalizing a Continuing Disclosure Certificate that is an Exhibit to the Preliminary Official Statement. Consistent with County Debt Management Policy, if bond insurance and/or a reserve fund surety bond or insurance policy is found to result in lower interest cost to the Successor Agency, the Designated Officers are authorized to approve modifications to the affected bond documents to accommodate the insurance and/or surety bond. The bond insurance or surety bond will be purchased with bond proceeds. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The Successor Agency will be unable to issue the Refunding Bonds and increase revenue to the taxing entities in the former redevelopment project areas. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2017/215 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 366 Preliminary Official Statement MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution No. 2017/215 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 367 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 06/13/2017 by the following vote: AYE: John Gioia Candace Andersen Diane Burgis Karen Mitchoff Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2017/215 A Resolution of the Successor Agency to the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency Approving the Form and Authorizing Distribution of a Preliminary Official Statement in Connection With the Offering and Sale of Tax Allocation Bonds to Refund Obligations of the Former Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency, and Approving Related Documents and Actions. WHEREAS, the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency (the “Former Agency”) was a public body, corporate and politic, duly established and authorized to transact business and exercise powers under and pursuant to the provisions of the Community Redevelopment Law of the State of California, constituting Part 1 of Division 24 of the California Health and Safety Code (the “Law”), including the power to borrow funds and issue bonds; and WHEREAS, in order to finance redevelopment and housing activities of the Former Agency, the Former Agency has incurred the following obligations: (i) pursuant to a Pleasant Hill Loan Agreement, dated as of May 1, 1992, between the County of Contra Costa Public Financing Authority (the “Authority”) and the Former Agency, as amended and supplemented by a First Supplement dated as of March 1, 1999, by a Second Supplement dated as of August 1, 2003, by a Third Supplement dated as of May 1, 2007, and by a Fourth Supplement dated as of May 1, 2012, each between the Former Agency and the Authority, the Former Agency incurred a 1999 Loan (the “PH 1999 Loan”) in the initial principal amount of $21,138,030.52 of which $6,995,000 is outstanding, a 2003A Loan (the “PH 2003A Loan”) in the initial principal amount of $19,195,000 of which $5,550,000 is outstanding, and a 2007A Loan (the “PH 2007A Loan,” and together with the PH 1999 Loan and the PH 2003A Loan, the “Pleasant Hill Loans”) in the initial principal amount of $37,775,000 of which $32,645,000 is outstanding; and (ii) pursuant to a West Pittsburg Loan Agreement, dated as of May 1, 1992, between the Former Agency and the Authority, as amended and supplemented by a First Supplement dated as of December 1, 1995, by a Second Supplement dated as of March 1, 1999, by a Third Supplement dated as of August 1, 2003, by a Fourth Supplement dated as of August 1, 2003, by a Fifth Supplement dated as of May 1, 2007, by a Sixth Supplement dated as of May 1, 2007 and by a Seventh Supplement dated as of May 1, 2012, each between the Former Agency and the Authority, the Former Agency incurred a 1999 Loan (the “WP 1999 Loan”) in the initial principal amount of $8,029,984.60 of which $175,000 is outstanding, a 2007A Loan (the “WP 2007A Loan”) in the initial principal amount of $24,195,000 of which $19,115,000 is outstanding, and a 2007B Loan (the “WP 2007B Loan,” and together with the WP 1999 Loan and the WP 2007A Loan, the “West Pittsburg Loans”) in the initial principal amount of $5,015,000 of which $4,520,000 is outstanding; and (iii) pursuant to a North Richmond Loan Agreement, dated as of May 1, 1992, between the Former Agency and the Authority, as amended and supplemented by a First Supplement dated as of June 1, 1995, by a Second Supplement dated as of March 1, 1999, by a Third Supplement dated as of August 1, 2003, by a Fourth Supplement dated as of August 1, 2003, by a Fifth Supplement dated as of May 1, 2007, by a Sixth Supplement dated as of May 1, 2007 and by a Seventh Supplement dated as of May 1, 2012, each between the Former Agency and the Authority, the Former Agency incurred a 2007A Loan (the “NR 2007A Loan”) in the initial principal amount of $16,685,000 of which $2,800,000 is outstanding, and a 2007B Loan (the “NR 2007B Loan,” and together with the NR 2007A Loan, the “North Richmond Loans”) in the initial principal amount of $3,975,000 of which $3,500,000 is outstanding; and (iv) pursuant to a Rodeo Loan Agreement, dated as of March 1, 1999, between the Former Agency and the Authority, as 5 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 368 amended and supplemented by a First Supplement dated as of August 1, 2003, by a Second Supplement dated as of August 1, 2003, by a Third Supplement dated as of May 1, 2007, by a Fourth Supplement dated as of May 1, 2007, and by a Fifth Supplement dated as of May 1, 2012, each between the Former Agency and the Authority, the Former Agency incurred a 2007A Loan (the “R 2007A Loan”) in the initial principal amount of $9,775,000 of which $5,265,000 is outstanding, and a 2007B Loan (the “R 2007B Loan,” and together with the R 2007A Loan, the “Rodeo Loans”) in the initial principal amount of $3,930,000 of which $3,465,000 is outstanding; and (v) pursuant to a Montalvin Manor Loan Agreement, dated as of May 1, 2007, between the Former Agency and the Authority, as amended and supplemented by a First Supplement dated as of May 1, 2007 and by a Second Supplement dated as of May 1, 2012, each between the Former Agency and the Authority, the Former Agency incurred a Loan (the “MM 2007A Loan”) in the initial principal amount of $2,195,000 of which $1,390,000 is outstanding, and a 2007B Loan (the “MM 2007B Loan,” and together with the MM 2007A Loan, the “Montalvin Manor Loans”) in the initial principal amount of $790,000 of which $680,000 is outstanding (the Pleasant Hill Loans, the West Pittsburg Loans, the North Richmond Loans, the Rodeo Loans and the Montalvin Manor Loans are collectively referred to herein as the “Prior Agency Indebtedness”); and WHEREAS, section 34177.5 of the Law authorizes the issuance by the Successor Agency to the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency (the “Successor Agency”) of refunding bonds pursuant to Article 11 (commencing with section 53580) of Chapter 3 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the California Government Code (the “Refunding Law”) for the purpose of achieving debt service savings within the parameters set forth in section 34177.5(a)(1) of the Law (the “Savings Parameters”); and WHEREAS, to determine compliance with the Savings Parameters for purposes of the issuance by the Successor Agency of the Refunding Bonds (as defined below), the Successor Agency has caused its municipal advisor, Montague DeRose and Associates, LLC (the “Municipal Advisor”), to prepare an analysis of the potential savings that will accrue to the Successor Agency and to applicable taxing entities as a result of the use of the proceeds of the Refunding Bonds to refund all or a portion of the Prior Agency Indebtedness (the “Debt Service Savings Analysis”); and WHEREAS, the Debt Service Savings Analysis has demonstrated that a refunding of the Prior Agency Indebtedness will satisfy the Savings Parameters; and WHEREAS, the Successor Agency has determined that, due to prevailing financial market conditions, it is in the best interests of the Successor Agency at this time to refinance the Prior Agency Indebtedness by means of the issuance of (i) its Successor Agency to the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds, Series 2017A (the “2017A Bonds”) to refinance the Pleasant Hill Loans the WP 1999 Loan, a portion of the WP 2007A Loan, the WP 2007B Loan, the NR 2007A Loan, a portion of the NR 2007B Loan, the R2007A Loan, a portion of the R2007B Loan and the MM 2007A Loan; and (ii) its Successor Agency to the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency Taxable Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds, Series 2017B (the “2017B Bonds,” and together with the 2017A Bonds, the “Refunding Bonds”) to refinance portions of the WP 2007A Loan, the NR 2007B Loan and the R 2007B Loan, and all of the MM 2007B Loan, all under the provisions of section 34177.5 of the Law and the Refunding Law; and WHEREAS, the Successor Agency adopted its Resolution No. 2017/147 on April 25, 2017 (the “Authorizing Resolution”), authorizing issuance of the Refunding Bonds and approving the form and authorizing execution of the various documents prepared in connection therewith; WHEREAS, the Oversight Board to the Successor Agency adopted its Resolution No. 2017-3 on May 4, 2017, approving the issuance of the Refunding Bonds by the Successor Agency; and WHEREAS, a preliminary official statement to be used in connection with the offering and sale of the Refunding Bonds has been prepared and it is appropriate at this time for the Successor Agency to approve the distribution of such preliminary official statement to prospective purchasers of the Refunding Bonds. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Successor Agency to the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency as follows: Section 1. The Successor Agency hereby approves the preliminary official statement for the Refunding Bonds (the “Preliminary Official Statement”) in the form on file with the Secretary, together with any changes therein or additions thereto deemed advisable by the Chair of the Board of Supervisors of the County, the County Administrator, the County Director of Conservation and Development, the Assistant Deputy Director of Conservation and Development, the Deputy Director of Conservation and Development for Policy Planning, or the Community Development Bond Program Manager of the County (each, a “Designated Officer”). The Successor Agency authorizes the Designated Officers, each acting alone, on behalf of the Successor Agency, to deem “final” pursuant to Rule 15c2-12 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Rule”) the Preliminary Official Statement prior to its distribution by Stifel, Nicolaus & Company Incorporated, the underwriter for the June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 369 Refunding Bonds (the “Underwriter”) to prospective purchasers of the Refunding Bonds. The Underwriter, on behalf of the Successor Agency, is authorized and directed to cause the Preliminary Official Statement to be distributed to such municipal bond broker-dealers, to such banking institutions and to such other persons as may be interested in purchasing the Refunding Bonds. The Designated Officers are hereby authorized and directed to assist the Disclosure Counsel in causing the Preliminary Official Statement to be brought into the form of a final official statement (the “Final Official Statement”), and the Designated Officers, each acting alone, are hereby authorized to execute the Final Official Statement and a statement that the facts contained in the Final Official Statement, and any supplement or amendment thereto (which shall be deemed an original part thereof for the purpose of such statement) were, at the time of sale of the Refunding Bonds, true and correct in all material respects and that the Final Official Statement did not, on the date of sale of the Refunding Bonds, and do not, as of the date of delivery of the Refunding Bonds contain any untrue statement of material fact with respect to the Successor Agency, the Former Agency or the Former Agency’s redevelopment project areas or omit to state material facts with respect to the Successor Agency, the Former Agency or the Former Agency’s redevelopment project areas required to be stated where necessary to make any statement made therein not misleading in the light of the circumstances under which it was made. The execution and delivery by a Designated Officer of the Final Official Statement, which shall include such changes and additions thereto deemed advisable by the Designated Officers and such information permitted to be excluded from the Preliminary Official Statement pursuant to the Rule, shall be conclusive evidence of the approval of the Final Official Statement by the Successor Agency. The Final Official Statement, when prepared, is approved for distribution in connection with the offering and sale of the Refunding Bonds. Section 2. The Designated Officers, and any and all other officers of the Successor Agency, are hereby authorized and directed, for and in the name and on behalf of the Successor Agency, to do any and all things and take any and all actions, including execution and delivery of a Continuing Disclosure Certificate in the form appended to the Final Official Statement, and of any and all assignments, certificates, requisitions, agreements, notices, consents, instruments of conveyance, warrants and other documents which they, or any of them, may deem necessary or advisable in order to consummate the lawful issuance and sale of the Refunding Bonds and the refinancing of the Prior Agency Indebtedness. In furtherance of the foregoing, the Designated Officers are hereby authorized to approve modifications to the documents approved by this Resolution or by the Authorizing Resolution to allow for municipal bond insurance and/or a reserve fund surety bond or insurance policy for the Refunding Bonds if, upon the advice of the Municipal Advisor, such insurance and/or surety bond or insurance policy are advantageous to the Successor Agency in the circumstances. Whenever in this Resolution any officer of the Successor Agency is authorized to execute or countersign any document or take any action, such execution, countersigning or action may be taken on behalf of such officer by any person designated by such officer to act on his or her behalf in the case such officer shall be absent or unavailable. Section 3. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage and adoption. Contact: Kristen Lackey, 925-674-7888 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: , Deputy cc: June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 370 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 371 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 372 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 373 SH DRAFT #4 5/31/2017 PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED __________, 2017 NEW ISSUE – BOOK-ENTRY ONLY RATINGS: Underlying: S&P: ___ _____ Insured: ___ (See “RATINGS”) In the opinion of Quint & Thimmig LLP, Larkspur, California, Bond Counsel, subject to compliance by the Successor Agency with certain covenants, interest on the Series 2017A Bonds is excludable from gross income of the owners thereof for federal income tax purposes and is not included as an item of tax preference in computing the federal alternative minimum tax for individuals and corporations under the Internal Code of 1986, as amended, but such interest is taken into account in computing an adjustment used in determining the federal alternative minimum tax for certain corporations. Interest on the Series 2017B Bonds is includible in gross income of the owners thereof for federal income tax purposes. In addition, in the opinion of Bond Counsel, interest on the Series 2017 Bonds is exempt from personal income taxation imposed by the State of California. See “TAX MATTERS.” SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY $__,___,000* Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds, Series 2017A $__,___,000* Taxable Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds, Series 2017B Dated: Date of Delivery Due: August 1, as shown on inside cover page The Successor Agency to the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency (the “Successor Agency”) is issuing $__,___,000* principal amount of its Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds, Series 2017A (the “Series 2017A Bonds”), and $__,___,000* principal amount of its Taxable Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds, Series 2017B (the “Series 2017B Bonds,” and together with the Series 2017A Bonds, the “Series 2017 Bonds”). The proceeds of the Series 2017 Bonds, together with other available funds, will be used to: (i) provide funds to prepay certain loans described herein (collectively, the “Former Agency Indebtedness”) made by the County of Contra Costa Public Financing Authority (the “Authority”) to the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency (the “Former Agency”) that financed redevelopment and housing activities of the Former Agency (see “THE PROJECT AREAS”) and thereby refund certain outstanding bonds issued by the Authority (collectively, the “Authority Prior Bonds”), the proceeds of which were used to fund the Former Agency Indebtedness; (ii) fund a deposit or purchase of a municipal bond debt service reserve policy, into a Reserve Account for the Series 2017 Bonds in an amount equal to the Reserve Requirement (defined herein); and (iii) pay certain costs associated with the issuance of the Series 2017 Bonds. See “PLAN OF REFUNDING.” The Series 2017 Bonds are being issued pursuant to Article 11 (commencing with Section 53580) of Chapter 3 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the California Government Code (the “Refunding Bond Law”), the provisions of Section 34177.5 of the Community Redevelopment Law, being Part 1 of Division 24 (commencing with Section 33000) of the California Health and Safety Code (the “Law”), an Indenture of Trust dated as of _______ 1, 2017 (the “Indenture”), by and between the Successor Agency and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (the “Trustee”), and a resolution of the Successor Agency adopted on April 25, 2017. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 374 The Series 2017 Bonds will each be issued as fully registered bonds and, when delivered, will be registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of The Depository Trust Company, New York, New York (“DTC”). DTC will act as securities depository for the Series 2017 Bonds, as more fully described in APPENDIX G. The Series 2017 Bonds will be dated the date of delivery and will be issued in registered form in denominations of $5,000 or any integral multiple of $5,000 and will mature on August 1 of each year in the amounts, and will bear interest at the respective rates, as set forth on the inside cover page of this Official Statement. Interest on the Series 2017 Bonds will be payable on each February 1 and August 1, commencing February 1, 2018. The Series 2017 Bonds are subject to optional and mandatory sinking account redemption prior to maturity. See “THE SERIES 2017 BONDS–Redemption Provisions.” The Series 2017 Bonds are limited obligations of the Successor Agency payable solely from and secured by a pledge of, security interest in and lien on Tax Revenues (as defined herein) and moneys held in certain funds and accounts established under the Indenture. See “SECURITY AND SOURCES OF PAYMENT FOR THE SERIES 2017 BONDS–Pledge of Tax Revenues.” The Successor Agency has applied to municipal bond insurers for a municipal bond insurance policy and a municipal bond debt service reserve policy for the Series 2017 Bonds. Subject to market conditions, the scheduled payment of principal of and interest on some or all of the Series 2017 Bonds when due may be guaranteed under a municipal bond insurance policy to be issued concurrently with the delivery of the Series 2017 Bonds. The Series 2017 Bonds are special obligations of the Successor Agency. The Series 2017 Bonds are not a debt of the County, the State of California or any of its political subdivisions, other than the Successor Agency, and none of the County, the State of California or any of its political subdivisions (other than the Successor Agency) is liable therefor. In no event shall payment of the principal or redemption price of, or interest on the Series 2017 Bonds constitute a debt, liability or obligation of any public agency (other than the limited obligation of the Successor Agency as set forth in the Indenture). The Series 2017 Bonds do not constitute an indebtedness within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory debt limitation or restriction, and none of the members of the Governing Board of the Successor Agency, the Oversight Board (defined herein), the County Board of Supervisors or any persons executing the Series 2017 Bonds are liable personally on the Series 2017 Bonds by reason of their issuance. The Successor Agency has no taxing power. See “SECURITY AND SOURCES OF PAYMENT FOR THE SERIES 2017 BONDS–Pledge of Tax Revenues.” MATURITY SCHEDULE (See inside cover page) This cover page contains certain information for general reference only. It is not a summary of the Series 2017 Bonds. Prospective investors must read the entire Official Statement to obtain information essential to the making of an informed investment decision with respect to the Series 2017 Bonds. Investment in the Series 2017 Bonds involves risks. See “CERTAIN RISKS TO BONDOWNERS” for a discussion of certain special risks factors that should be considered, in addition to the other matters set forth herein, in evaluating the investment quality of the Series 2017 Bonds. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 375 The Series 2017 Bonds are offered when, as and if issued, subject to the approval as to their legality of Quint & Thimmig LLP, Larkspur, California, Bond Counsel to the Successor Agency, and certain other conditions. Certain other legal matters will be passed on for the Successor Agency by Goldfarb & Lipman, Oakland, California, as counsel to the Successor Agency and by Schiff Hardin LLP, San Francisco, California, Disclosure Counsel to the Successor Agency, and for the Underwriter by Jones Hall, A Professional Law Corporation, San Francisco, California, Underwriter’s Counsel. It is anticipated that the Series 2017 Bonds in book-entry only form will be available for delivery through the facilities of DTC in New York, New York on or about July __, 2017. Stifel Logo The date of this Official Statement is _______, 2017 _______________ * Preliminary, subject to change. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 376 MATURITY SCHEDULE $__,___,000* Successor Agency to the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds, Series 2017A $______* Serial Bonds Maturity (August 1) Principal Amount Interest Rate Yield CUSIP No. † ( ) $_______ ___% Term Bonds due August 1, 20__, Price ____, Yield ____, CUSIP No.† _______ $_______ ___% Term Bonds due August 1, 20__, Price ____, Yield ____, CUSIP No.† _______ $__,___,000* Successor Agency to the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency Taxable Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds, Series 2017B Maturity (August 1) Principal Amount Interest Rate Yield CUSIP No. † ( ) ______________ * Preliminary, subject to change. † Copyright 2017, American Bankers Association. CUSIP® is a registered trademark of the American Bankers Association. CUSIP data herein is provided by CUSIP Global Services, operated by the CUSIP Service Bureau, is managed on behalf of the American Bankers Association by Standard & Poor‟s. Standard & Poor‟s is a unit of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. This data is not intended to create a database and does not serve in any way as a substitute for the CUSIP Global Services. CUSIP numbers have been assigned by an independent company not affiliated with the Successor Agency or the County and are included solely for convenience of the registered owners of the Series 2017 Bonds. None of the Successor Agency, the County or the Underwriter is responsible for the selection or uses of the CUSIP numbers, and no representation is made as to their correctness on the applicable Series 2017 Bonds or as included herein. The CUSIP number for a specific maturity is subject to being changed after delivery of the Series 2017 Bonds as a result of various subsequent actions, including, but not limited to, a refunding in whole or in part or as the result of the procurement of a secondary market portfolio insurance or other similar enhancement by investors that is applicable to all or a portion of certain maturities of the Series 2017 Bonds. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 377 SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY SUCCESSOR AGENCY GOVERNING BOARD MEMBERS AND COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Federal Glover, District V, Chair/Chair of the Board of Supervisors Karen Mitchoff, District IV, Vice Chair/ Vice Chair of the Board of Supervisors John M. Gioia, District I, Member/ Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II, Member/ Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III, Member/ Supervisor SUCCESSOR AGENCY ADMINISTRATION David J. Twa, County Administrator John Kopchik, Director, County Department of Conservation and Development Russell V. Watts, County Treasurer SPECIAL SERVICES Goldfarb & Lipman LLP Oakland, California Special Counsel to the Successor Agency Quint & Thimmig LLP Larkspur, California Bond Counsel Schiff Hardin LLP San Francisco, California Disclosure Counsel Montague DeRose and Associates, LLC Walnut Creek, California Municipal Advisor Fraser & Associates Roseville, California Fiscal Consultant U.S. Bank National Association San Francisco, California Trustee and Escrow Agent Causey Demgen & Moore P.C. Denver, Colorado Verification Agent June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 378 No Offering May Be Made Except by this Official Statement. No dealer, broker, salesperson or other person has been authorized by the Successor Agency, the County, or the Underwriter to give any information or to make any representations other than as contained in this Official Statement, and if given or made, such other information or representations must not be relied upon as having been authorized by any of the foregoing. No Unlawful, Sales, Solicitations, or Offers. This Official Statement does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, and there shall not be any sale of the Series 2017 Bonds by any person, in any jurisdiction in which it is unlawful for such person to make such offer, solicitation or sale. Use of this Official Statement. This Official Statement is submitted in connection with the sale of the Series 2017 Bonds referred to in this Official Statement and may not be reproduced or used, in whole or in part, for any other purpose. This Official Statement is not to be construed as a contract with the purchasers of the Series 2017 Bonds. Statements contained in this Official Statement which involve estimates, forecasts or matters of opinion, whether or not expressly so described herein, are intended solely as such and are not to be construed as representations of fact. Effective Date. This Official Statement speaks only as of its date. The information and expressions of opinion stated herein are subject to change without notice; and neither the delivery of this Official Statement nor any sale made hereunder shall, under any circumstances, create any implication that there has been no change in the affairs of the Successor Agency, the County, or the Project Areas since the date hereof. Preparation of this Official Statement. The information set forth herein has been obtained from sources which are believed to be reliable, but such information is neither guaranteed as to accuracy or completeness, nor to be construed as a representation of such by the Successor Agency, the County, or the Underwriter. The Underwriter was provided the following sentence for inclusion in this Official Statement. The Underwriter has reviewed the information in this Official Statement in accordance with, and as part of, its responsibilities to investors under the federal securities laws as applied to the facts and circumstances of this transaction, but the Underwriter does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of such information. Stabilization of and Changes to Offering Prices. In connection with this offering, the Underwriter may overallot or effect transactions which stabilize or maintain the market price of the Series 2017 Bonds at a level above that which might otherwise prevail in the open market. Such stabilizing, if commenced, may be discontinued at any time. The Underwriter may offer and sell the Series 2017 Bonds to certain dealers and others at yields higher than the initial public offering yields set forth on the inside cover page hereof and said initial public offering yields may be changed from time to time by the Underwriter. The issuance and sale of the Series 2017 Bonds have not been registered under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, both as amended, in reliance upon exemptions provided thereunder by Sections 3(a)(2) and 3(a)(12), respectively, for the issuance and sale of municipal securities and the Indenture has not been qualified under the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, as amended. The Series 2017 Bonds have not been registered or qualified under the securities laws of any state. Use of Estimates and Projections. Certain statements contained in this Official Statement reflect not historical facts but forecasts and “forward-looking statements.” In this respect, the words “estimate,” “project,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “intend,” “believe,” “plan,” “budget,” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Projections, forecasts, assumptions, expressions of opinions, estimates and other forward statements are not to be construed as representations of fact and are qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements set forth in this Official Statement. The achievement of certain results or other expectations contained in such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results, performance or achievements described to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. The Successor Agency does not plan to issue any updates or revisions to those forward-looking statements if or when its expectations or events, conditions or circumstances on which such statements are based occur or do not occur. Website Information Not Incorporated by Reference. The Successor Agency and the County each maintain a website. Unless specifically indicated otherwise, the information presented on those websites is not incorporated June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 379 by reference as part of this Official Statement and should not be relied upon in making investment decisions with respect to the Series 2017 Bonds. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 380 i TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................................. 1 General; Authority; Purpose ................................................................................................................... 1 The Former Agency, the County, the Successor Agency, and the Oversight Board ................................................................................................................................................ 1 The Dissolution Act ................................................................................................................................ 2 The Project Areas and Redevelopment Plans ......................................................................................... 3 Tax Increment Financing Under the Dissolution Act ................................................................................................................................ 3 Security for the Series 2017 Bonds ........................................................................................................ 4 Fiscal Consultant Report ........................................................................................................................ 4 Continuing Disclosure ............................................................................................................................ 5 Additional Information ........................................................................................................................... 5 PLAN OF REFUNDING ................................... 5 Description ............................................................................................................................................. 5 Escrow Agreements ................................................................................................................................ 7 Verification ............................................................................................................................................. 7 ESTIMATED SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS....................................................... 8 DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE .......................... 9 THE SERIES 2017 BONDS ............................ 10 Authority for Issuance .......................................................................................................................... 10 Description of the Series 2017 Bonds .................................................................................................. 10 Redemption Provisions ......................................................................................................................... 11 Redemption Procedures ........................................................................................................................ 12 PROPERTY TAX REVENUE FINANCING UNDER THE DISSOLUTION ACT .............................. 13 General ................................................................................................................................................. 13 Recognized Obligation Payment Schedules ......................................................................................... 14 Elimination of Housing Set-Aside ........................................................................................................ 17 No Plan Limits ...................................................................................................................................... 17 SECURITY AND SOURCES OF PAYMENT FOR THE SERIES 2017 BONDS .................................................... 18 Pledge of Tax Revenues ....................................................................................................................... 18 Adjustments to Tax Increment Revenues ............................................................................................. 19 Flow of Funds under the Indenture ...................................................................................................... 20 Reserve Account ................................................................................................................................... 21 Covenant of the Successor Agency to Process ROPS ................................................................................................................................ 22 No Additional Debt Other than Refunding Bonds ............................................................................................................................................. 23 LIMITATIONS ON TAX REVENUES AND POSSIBLE SPENDING LIMITATIONS ........................................ 23 Article XIII A of the California Constitution ....................................................................................... 23 Article XIII B of the California Constitution ....................................................................................... 25 Articles XIII C and XIII D of the California Constitution ................................................................................................................................... 25 Tax-Sharing Payments ......................................................................................................................... 26 Proposition 87 ...................................................................................................................................... 28 Property Tax Collection Procedures .................................................................................................... 28 Unitary Property ................................................................................................................................... 30 Future Initiatives .................................................................................................................................. 30 THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY ........................ 31 General ................................................................................................................................................. 31 Successor Agency Powers .................................................................................................................... 31 Status of Compliance with Dissolution Act ......................................................................................... 31 Financial Statements ............................................................................................................................ 32 THE COUNTY ................................................ 32 THE PROJECT AREAS ................................. 33 Land Uses ............................................................................................................................................. 36 Historical Taxable Values .................................................................................................................... 38 Ten Largest Property Taxpayers .......................................................................................................... 40 Appeals and Other Reductions to Assessed Values ............................................................................................................................................ 41 Historical Property Tax Revenues ....................................................................................................... 44 Projected Property Tax Revenues and Debt Service Coverage ........................................................................................................................... 44 CERTAIN RISKS TO BONDOWNERS ........ 46 Recognized Obligation Payment Schedules ......................................................................................... 46 Challenges to Dissolution Act .............................................................................................................. 47 Concentration of Tax Base ................................................................................................................... 47 Reduction in Taxable Value ................................................................................................................. 47 Appeals to Assessed Values [Moved] .................................................................................................. 48 Estimates of Property Tax Revenues ................................................................................................... 48 Bankruptcy and Foreclosure ................................................................................................................ 49 Investment Risk .................................................................................................................................... 49 General Economic Risks ...................................................................................................................... 49 Seismic Activity ................................................................................................................................... 49 Climate Change .................................................................................................................................... 50 Hazardous Substances .......................................................................................................................... 52 Levy and Collection of Taxes .............................................................................................................. 52 Reductions in Inflationary Rate ........................................................................................................... 52 Changes in the Law .............................................................................................................................. 53 Loss of Tax-Exemption ........................................................................................................................ 53 Secondary Market ................................................................................................................................ 53 LEGAL MATTERS ........................................ 53 TAX MATTERS ............................................. 54 Series 2017A Bonds ............................................................................................................................. 54 Series 2017B Bonds ............................................................................................................................. 56 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 381 ii Forms of Bond Counsel Opinions ........................................................................................................ 58 NO MATERIAL LITIGATION ...................... 58 RATINGS ........................................................ 58 UNDERWRITING .......................................... 59 Series 2017A Bonds ............................................................................................................................. 59 Series 2017B Bonds ............................................................................................................................. 59 CONTINUING DISCLOSURE ....................... 59 REPORT OF THE FISCAL CONSULTANT ....................................... 60 MUNICIPAL ADVISOR ................................ 60 VERIFICATION OF MATHEMATICAL COMPUTATIONS .................................. 60 MISCELLANEOUS ........................................ 61 APPENDICES APPENDIX A ─ GENERAL COUNTY ECONOMIC AND DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION ........................................................................................................ A-1 APPENDIX B– FISCAL CONSULTANT REPORT .......................................................................... B-1 APPENDIX C – AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2016 ............................................................... C-1 APPENDIX D ─ SUMMARY OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE INDENTURE ....................... D-1 APPENDIX E ─ FORM OF CONTINUING DISCLOSURE CERTIFICATE .................................... E-1 APPENDIX F ─ FORMS OF OPINIONS OF BOND COUNSEL ....................................................... F-1 APPENDIX G ─ DTC AND THE BOOK-ENTRY ONLY SYSTEM ................................................. G-1 LIST OF TABLES Table 1 – List of Authority Prior Bonds ........................................................................................... 6 Table 2 – Estimated Sources and Uses of Funds ............................................................................... 8 Table 3 – Debt Service Schedule ...................................................................................................... 9 Table 4 – AB 1290 AV Base Year .................................................................................................. 26 Table 5 – Summary of Project Areas .............................................................................................. 33 Table 6 – Land Uses ........................................................................................................................ 35 Table 7 – Historical Assessed Values ............................................................................................. 37 Table 8 – Summary of Secured Value Changes .............................................................................. 38 Table 9 – Ten Largest Property Taxpayers ..................................................................................... 39 Table 10 – Resolved Appeals / Open Appeals .................................................................................. 42 Table 11 – Historical Tax Increment Receipts .................................................................................. 43 Table 12 – Projection of Property Tax Revenue - 2% Growth ......................................................... 44 Table 13 – Projected Debt Service Coverage - 2% Growth .............................................................. 45 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 382 Map of Project Areas iii June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 383 OFFICIAL STATEMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY $__,___,000* Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds, Series 2017A $__,___,000* Taxable Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds, Series 2017B INTRODUCTION The description and summaries of various documents hereinafter set forth do not purport to be comprehensive or definitive, and reference is made to each document for the complete details of all its terms and conditions. All statements herein are qualified in their entirety by reference to each such document. All capitalized terms used in this Official Statement and not otherwise defined herein have the same meaning as in the Indenture (defined below). General; Authority; Purpose This Official Statement, including the cover page, the inside cover page and through the Appendices hereto, is provided to furnish certain information in connection with the issuance and sale by the Successor Agency to the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency (the “Successor Agency”) of $__,___,000* principal amount of its Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds, Series 2017A (the “Series 2017A Bonds”), and $__,___,000* principal amount of its Taxable Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds, Series 2017B (the “Series 2017B Bonds,” and together with the Series 2017A Bonds, the “Series 2017 Bonds”). The Successor Agency is issuing the Series 2017 Bonds pursuant to authority granted by Section 34177.5(g) of the Health & Safety Code of the State of California (the “Law”), Article 11 (commencing with section 53580) of Chapter 3 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California (the “Refunding Bond Law”), and an Indenture of Trust, dated as of _______ 1, 20 17 (the “Indenture”) by and between the Successor Agency and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (the “Trustee”). The proceeds of the Series 2017 Bonds, together with other available funds, will be used to: (i) provide funds to prepay certain loans described herein (collectively, the “Former Agency Indebtedness”) made by the County of Contra Costa Public Financing Authority (the “Authority”) to the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency (the “Former Agency”) that financed redevelopment and housing activities of the Former Agency and thereby refund certain outstanding bonds issued by the Authority (collectively, the “Authority Prior Bonds”), the proceeds of which were used to fund the Former Agency Indebtedness; (ii) fund a deposit or purchase of a municipal bond debt service reserve policy, into a Reserve Fund for the Series 2017 Bonds in an amount equal to the Reserve Requirement (defined herein); and (iii) pay certain costs associated with the issuance of the Series 2017 Bonds. See “PLAN OF REFUNDING.” The Former Agency, the County, the Successor Agency, and the Oversight Board The Former Agency. The Former Agency was established pursuant to the Law and Ordinance No. 83-67 adopted by the County of Contra Costa Board of Supervisors (the “Board of Supervisors”) on December 6, 1983. _______________ * Preliminary, subject to change. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 384 2 The County. The County of Contra Costa (the “County”) is located in northern California, approximately 20 miles northeast of San Francisco, and is the ninth most populous county in California. The County is bounded by Solano County and Suisun Bay to the north, San Joaquin County and the San Joaquin River Delta to the east, Alameda County to the south, and the San Francisco and San Pablo Bays to the west. The County seat is in the City of Martinez. Major industries in the County include petroleum refining and telecommunications. As of January 1, 2017 the population within the County was estimated by the State Department of Finance (the “Department of Finance”) to be 1,139,513. For certain economic, demographic and financial information with respect to the County, see APPENDIX A–“GENERAL COUNTY ECONOMIC AND DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION.” The Successor Agency. Pursuant to Section 34173 of the Dissolution Act, the County adopted Resolution No. 2012/19 on January 17, 2012, electing and determining to become the “successor agency” to the Former Agency. Pursuant to AB 1484 (as defined herein), the Successor Agency is a separate legal entity from the County. The Successor Agency administers enforceable obligations for five project areas. See “THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY.” The Oversight Board. The Dissolution Act also required establishment of an oversight board for each successor agency. On April 18, 2012, the Oversight Board of the Successor Agency to the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency (the “Oversight Board”) was established pursuant to California Health and Safety Code Section 34179(a). The Dissolution Act Two bills enacted by the California legislature as part of the 2011 California State Budget Act (ABx1 26 and ABx1 27 (Chapter 6, Statutes of 2011-12, First Extraordinary Session) (“AB 26” and “AB 27,” respectively) dissolved all California redevelopment agencies, and designated “successor agencies” and “oversight boards” to satisfy “enforceable obligations” of the dissolved redevelopment agencies and to administer the wind down and dissolution of the dissolved redevelopment agencies. AB 27 allowed redevelopment agencies to avoid dissolution if the city or county that created the redevelopment agency made certain payments for the benefit of the local schools and other taxing entities according to their base property tax allocations. Both of these bills were challenged before the California Supreme Court by the California Redevelopment Association and other organizations. On December 29, 2011 the California Supreme Court issued its decision in California Redevelopment Association v. Matosantos et al. (No. S194861) (“Matosantos”) regarding the constitutionality of AB 26 and AB 27. The Court upheld AB 26 requiring the dissolution of redevelopment agencies and the transfer of assets and obligations of the dissolved agencies to successor agencies, and invalidated AB 27. The Matosantos decision also modified various deadlines for the implementation of AB 26. See “SECURITY AND SOURCES OF PAYMENT FOR THE SERIES 2017 BONDS.” As a consequence of the Matosantos decision all redevelopment agencies in the State, including the Former Agency, were dissolved by operation of law on February 1, 2012. All property tax revenues that would have been allocated to redevelopment agencies, including the Former Agency, are now allocated to the applicable redevelopment property tax trust fund created by the county auditor-controller for the applicable successor agency. Such funds are to be used to make payments on indebtedness and other “enforceable obligations” (as defined in AB 26), and to pay certain administrative costs; and any amounts in excess of those amounts are to be considered property taxes to be distributed to applicable taxing agencies. In addition, under AB 26, tax increment is no longer deemed to flow to the successor agency and the requirement to deposit a portion of the tax increment into a low and moderate income June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 385 3 housing fund is also no longer required. See “SECURITY AND SOURCES OF PAYMENT FOR THE SERIES 2017 BONDS” The primary provisions of AB 26 were amended by the provisions of Assembly Bill No. 1484, enacted as Chapter 26, Statutes of 2012 (“AB 1484”), as further amended by Senate Bill 107, enacted as Chapter 325, Statutes of 2015 (“SB 107”). Such statutes are codified in Part 1.8 and Part 1.85 of Division 24 of the California Health and Safety Code (the “Dissolution Act”). The Project Areas and Redevelopment Plans The redevelopment plans (collectively, the “Redevelopment Plans” and each a “Redevelopment Plan”) of the Former Agency for the Bay Point Redevelopment Project Area, the Contra Costa Centre Redevelopment Project Area (formerly the Pleasant Hill BART Redevelopment Project Area), the Montalvin Manor Redevelopment Project Area, the North Richmond Redevelopment Project Area, and the Rodeo Redevelopment Project Area) (collectively, the “Project Areas” and individually, a “Project Area”) were each adopted by the Former Agency between 1984 and 2003. Each Redevelopment Plan was adopted for the purpose of alleviating physical and economic blighting conditions, and construction and/or rehabilitating public infrastructure and public facility improvements within the respective Project Area in order to stimulate development. For descriptions of the Redevelopment Plans and the Project Areas, see “THE PROJECT AREAS.” Tax Increment Financing Under the Dissolution Act Prior to the enactment of the Dissolution Act, the Law authorized the financing of redevelopment projects through the use of “tax increment revenues.” This method provided that the taxable valuation of the property within a redevelopment project area on the property tax roll last equalized prior to the effective date of the ordinance that adopted the redevelopment plan became the base year valuation. Assuming the taxable valuation never dropped below the base year level, the taxing agencies thereafter received that portion of the taxes produced by applying then current tax rates to the base year valuation, and the redevelopment agency was allocated the remaining portion produced by applying then current tax rates to the increase in valuation over the base year. Such incremental tax revenues allocated to a redevelopment agency were authorized to be pledged to the payment of agency obligations. The Dissolution Act authorizes successor agencies to issue refunding bonds secured by a pledge of monies deposited from time to time in a redevelopment property tax trust fund held by a county auditor-controller with respect to a successor agency, which are equivalent to the tax increment revenues that were formerly allocated under the Law to the redevelopment agency and formerly authorized under the Law to be used for the financing of redevelopment projects and low and moderate income housing activities. Pursuant to the Indenture, payment of the Series 2017 Bonds are secured, in part, by a pledge of “Tax Revenues,” which consist of the moneys deposited from time to time in the redevelopment property tax trust fund (the “Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund”) established for the Successor Agency pursuant to and as provided in the Dissolution Act, after payment of certain County administrative fees and other Senior Obligations. See “SECURITY AND SOURCES OF PAYMENT FOR THE SERIES 2017 BONDS.” The Dissolution Act requires a successor agency to continue to make payments and perform other obligations required under enforceable obligations of the dissolved redevelopment agency. The Dissolution Act defines an “enforceable obligation” to include, in relevant part, bonds, including the required debt service, reserve set-asides and any other payments required under the document governing the issuance of the outstanding bonds of the former agency or any authorized refunding thereof. Payment June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 386 4 and performance of enforceable obligations is subject to review by oversight boards, the State Controller and Department of Finance. See “PROPERTY TAX REVENUE FINANCING UNDER THE DISSOLUTION ACT.” Security for the Series 2017 Bonds The Series 2017 Bonds and any Parity Debt are equally secured by a pledge and lien on all Tax Revenues and by a first and exclusive pledge and lien upon all of the moneys in the Debt Service Fund, including the Interest Account, the Principal Account, the Sinking Account and the Redemption Account therein, and by amounts in the Redevelopment Obligation Retirement Fund. The Series 2017 Bonds (and not any Parity Debt) are also secured by an exclusive pledge of, security interest in and lien on amounts in the Reserve Account. Except for the Tax Revenues and such moneys, no funds or properties of the Successor Agency or the County are pledged to, or otherwise liable for, the payment of principal of or interest or redemption premium (if any) on the Series 2017 Bonds. The Series 2017 Bonds are special obligations of the Successor Agency. The Series 2017 Bonds are not a debt of the County, the State of California or any of its political subdivisions, other than the Successor Agency, and none of the County, the State of California or any of its political subdivisions (other than the Successor Agency) is liable therefor. In no event shall payment of the principal or redemption price of, or interest on the Series 2017 Bonds constitute a debt, liability or obligation of any public agency (other than the limited obligation of the Successor Agency as set forth in the Indenture). The Series 2017 Bonds do not constitute an indebtedness within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory debt limitation or restriction, and none of the members of the Governing Board of the Successor Agency, the Oversight Board (defined herein), the County Board of Supervisors or any persons executing the Series 2017 Bonds are liable personally on the Series 2017 Bonds by reason of their issuance. The Successor Agency has no taxing power. See “SECURITY AND SOURCES OF PAYMENT FOR THE SERIES 2017 BONDS–Pledge of Tax Revenues.” Municipal Bond Insurance Policy. The Successor Agency has applied to municipal bond insurers for a municipal bond insurance policy and a municipal bond debt service reserve policy for the Series 2017 Bonds. The scheduled payment of principal of and interest on some or all of the Series 2017 Bonds when due may be guaranteed under a municipal bond insurance policy to be issued concurrently with the delivery of the Series 2017 Bonds. Reserve Account. Under the Indenture, the Successor Agency is required to establish and fund a reserve account (a “Reserve Account”) within the Debt Service Fund, in an amount equal to the Reserve Account Requirement (as defined herein). The Successor Agency may satisfy this requirement by depositing in the Reserve Account a municipal bond debt service reserve insurance policy issued concurrently with the delivery of the Series 2017 Bonds. See “SECURITY AND SOURCES OF PAYMENT FOR THE SERIES 2017 BONDS–Reserve Account” and APPENDIX D–“SUMMARY OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE INDENTURE.” Fiscal Consultant Report Included as APPENDIX B to this Official Statement is a Fiscal Consultant Report (the “Fiscal Consultant Report”) prepared by Fraser & Associates (the “Fiscal Consultant”) which, among other things, analyzes the property tax revenues generated from taxable property within the Project Areas and pledged to the repayment of the Series 2017 Bonds. The findings and projections in the Fiscal Consultant Report are subject to a number of assumptions that should be reviewed and considered by prospective investors. No assurances can be given that the projections and expectations discussed in the Fiscal Consultant Report will be achieved. Actual results may differ materially from the projections described therein. See “THE PROJECT AREAS” and APPENDIX B–“FISCAL CONSULTANT REPORT.” June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 387 5 Continuing Disclosure The Successor Agency has covenanted for the benefit of Bondowners and Beneficial Owners to provide certain financial information and operating data relating to the Successor Agency by not later than the date that is nine months after the end of the fiscal year of the Successor Agency (currently March 31), commencing with the report due March 31, 2018 for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2017 (the “Annual Report”), and to provide notices of the occurrence of certain significant events. The Annual Report and notices of significant events will be filed by the Successor Agency or the Dissemination Agent, if any, on behalf of the Successor Agency through the Electronic Municipal Market Access (“EMMA”) site maintained by the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (the “MSRB”). These covenants have been made in order to assist the Underwriter in complying with Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 15c2-12(b)(5). The specific nature of the information to be contained in the Annual Report or the notices of significant events by the Successor Agency is set forth in APPENDIX E–“FORM OF CONTINUING DISCLOSURE CERTIFICATE.” Also see “CONTINUING DISCLOSURE.” Additional Information Brief descriptions of the Series 2017 Bonds, the security for the Series 2017 Bonds, the Successor Agency and the County are included in this Official Statement together with summaries of certain provisions of the Law, the Refunding Bond Law, the Dissolution Act, the Indenture, the Series 2017 Bonds, and the Escrow Agreements (as defined herein). Such descriptions do not purport to be comprehensive or definitive. All references herein to the Indenture and the Escrow Agreements are qualified in their entirety by reference to such documents, copies of which are available for inspection at the office of the Successor Agency at 30 Muir Road, Martinez, California 94553. PLAN OF REFUNDING Description In order to finance redevelopment and housing activities, the Former Agency entered into the following loan agreements and incurred the following loans (collectively, the “Former Agency Indebtedness”): A Pleasant Hill Loan Agreement, dated as of May 1, 1992, between the Former Agency and the Authority, as amended and supplemented. Pursuant to the Pleasant Hill Loan Agreement, the Former Agency incurred a 1999 Loan in the initial principal amount of $21,138,030.52 of which $6,995,000 is outstanding, a 2003A Loan in the initial principal amount of $19,195,000 of which $5,550,000 is outstanding, and a 2007A Loan, in the initial principal amount of $37,775,000 of which $32,645,000 is outstanding. A West Pittsburg Loan Agreement, dated as of May 1, 1992, between the Former Agency and the Authority, as amended and supplemented. Pursuant to the West Pittsburg Loan Agreement, the Former Agency incurred a 1999 Loan in the initial principal amount of $8,029,984.60 of which $175,000 is outstanding, a 2007A Loan in the initial principal amount of $24,195,000 of which $19,115,000 is outstanding, and a 2007B Loan in the initial principal amount of $5,015,000 of which $4,520,000 is outstanding. A North Richmond Loan Agreement, dated as of May 1, 1992, between the Former Agency and the Authority, as amended and supplemented. Pursuant to the North Richmond Loan Agreement, the Former Agency incurred a 2007A Loan in the initial June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 388 6 principal amount of $16,685,000 of which $2,800,000 is outstanding, and a 2007B Loan in the initial principal amount of $3,975,000 of which $3,500,000 is outstanding. A Rodeo Loan Agreement, dated as of March 1, 1999, between the Former Agency and the Authority, as amended and supplemented. Pursuant to the Rodeo Loan Agreement, the Former Agency incurred a 2007A Loan in the initial principal amount of $9,775,000 of which $5,265,000 is outstanding, and a 2007B Loan in the initial principal amount of $3,930,000 of which $3,465,000 is outstanding. A Montalvin Manor Loan Agreement, dated as of May 1, 2007, between the Former Agency and the Authority, as amended and supplemented. Pursuant to the Montalvin Manor Loan Agreement, the Former Agency incurred a Loan in the initial principal amount of $2,195,000 of which $1,390,000 is outstanding, and a 2007B Loan in the initial principal amount of $790,000 of which $680,000 is outstanding. The Successor Agency will apply the proceeds from the prepayment of the Former Agency Indebtedness to refund the Authority Prior Bonds described below. Proceeds from the sale of the Series 2017 Bonds and certain other funds will be deposited by the Successor Agency in five separate irrevocable escrow funds (each, an “Escrow Fund”) established pursuant to separate escrow agreements, such deposits will constitute prepayment of amounts owed under the loan agreements securing the respective series of Authority Prior Bonds. See also “–Escrow Agreements.” The Authority Prior Bonds consist of the following: Table 1 List of Authority Prior Bonds $7,170,000 outstanding principal amount of 1999 Tax Allocation Revenue Bonds, (Pleasant Hill BART, North Richmond, Bay Point, Oakley and Rodeo Redevelopment Project Areas). $5,550,000 outstanding principal amount of 2003 Tax Allocation Revenue Bonds, Series A (Multiple Project Areas). $50,725,000 outstanding principal amount of 2007 Tax Allocation Revenue Bonds, Series A (Contra Costa Centre, North Richmond, Bay Point, Rodeo and Montalvin Manor Project Areas). $22,865,000 outstanding principal amount of 2007 Taxable Tax Allocation Revenue Bonds, Series A-T (North Richmond, Bay Point, Rodeo and Montalvin Manor Project Areas). $13,105,000 outstanding principal amount of 2007 Tax Allocation Revenue Bonds, Subordinate Series B (Contra Costa Centre, North Richmond, Bay Point, Rodeo and Montalvin Manor Project Areas). June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 389 7 Escrow Agreements With respect to each series of Authority Prior Bonds, the Successor Agency, the County of Contra Costa County Public Financing Authority, and U.S. Bank National Association, as escrow bank (the “Escrow Bank”) will enter into a separate Escrow Deposit and Trust Agreement (each an “Escrow Agreement” and collectively, the “Escrow Agreements”). Each Escrow Agreement will be dated as of ________ 1, 2017 and will contain substantially the same terms and provisions, which include primarily the establishment of an escrow fund (each, an “Escrow Fund” and collectively, the “Escrow Funds”). On the delivery date of the Series 2017 Bonds, the Successor Agency will deposit a portion of the proceeds of the Series 2017 Bonds, together with certain other available funds, in the applicable Escrow Fund held by the Escrow Bank. See “ESTIMATED SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS.” The funds deposited with the Escrow Bank will be held in cash uninvested or invested in noncallable direct obligations of the United States of America, or securities fully and unconditionally guaranteed as to the timely payment of principal and interest by the United States of America to which the direct obligation or guarantee the full faith and credit of the United States of America has been pledged (collective ly, the “Escrowed Federal Securities”) that are irrevocably pledged solely to the payment of the principal and interest becoming due on the applicable Authority Prior Bonds on August 1, 2017, and to redeem the Authority Prior Bonds maturing after August 1, 2017 on August 1, 2017 (the “Redemption Date”). Amounts on deposit in the Escrow Funds are not available to make payments on the Series 2017 Bonds. Upon such deposit, each series of Authority Prior Bonds will be legally defeased, the Former Agency Indebtedness securing each series of Authority Prior Bonds will be prepaid and discharged and the Authority Prior Bonds will no longer be deemed outstanding under the trust indentures pursuant to which the Authority Prior Bonds were issued. Verification Causey Demgen & Moore P.C., independent certified public accountants, as the Verification Agent, will deliver a report on sufficiency of the deposits in the Escrow Funds to pay and redeem the Authority Prior Bonds, and the mathematical accuracy of certain computations based upon certain information and assertions provided to them by the Underwriter relating to the outstanding principal of and interest on the Authority Prior Bonds. For information on mathematical verification of the sufficiency of scheduled payments with respect to such obligations of the United States of America and other funds held in the funds established pursuant to the Escrow Agreements to make such payments, see “VERIFICATION OF MATHEMATICAL COMPUTATIONS.” June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 390 8 ESTIMATED SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS The estimated sources and uses of funds in connection with the financing are set forth in the following table: Table 2 Estimated Sources and Uses of Funds Series 2017A Series 2017B Bonds Bonds Total Sources of Funds Principal Amount of Series 2017 Bonds $ $ $ Less: Underwriter‟s Discount Original Issue Premium Plus: Balances in Certain Funds and Accounts(1) TOTAL ESTIMATED SOURCES Uses of Funds Deposit to Escrow Funds(2) Deposit to Costs of Issuance Fund(3) TOTAL ESTIMATED USES ______________ (1) Includes certain amounts held by U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee under the Authority Prior Bonds indentures and the Former Agency Indebtedness. (2) See “PLAN OF REFUNDING.” (3) Includes fees of Bond Counsel, Disclosure Counsel, the Municipal Advisor, the initial fees of the Trustee, fees of the Fiscal Consultant, the Escrow Bank, and the Verification Agent, the premiums for the [municipal bond insurance policy and] [debt service reserve policy], printing costs and other miscellaneous expenses. (Remainder of this Page Intentionally Left Blank) June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 391 9 DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE The scheduled debt service for the Series 2017 Bonds, assuming no optional redemption of the Series 2017 Bonds, is set forth below: Table 3 Debt Service Schedule Series 2017A Bonds Series 2017B Bonds Bond Year Ending Principal Interest Total Principal Interest Total Total 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 (Remainder of this Page Intentionally Left Blank) June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 392 10 THE SERIES 2017 BONDS Authority for Issuance The issuance of the Series 2017 Bonds was authorized by the Successor Agency pursuant to Resolution No. 2017-147, adopted on April 25, 2017 (the “Successor Agency Resolution”), and was approved by the Oversight Board for the Successor Agency pursuant to Resolution No. 2017/3, adopted on May 4, 2017 (the “Oversight Board Resolution”). The Department of Finance approved the issuance of the Series 2017 Bonds on June __, 2017. Section 34177.5 of the Dissolution Act provides that when, as here, a successor agency issues refunding bonds with the approval of its oversight board and the Department of Finance, the oversight board may not unilaterally approve any amendments to or early termination of the bonds, and the scheduled payments on the bonds shall be listed in the recognized obligation payment schedule and are not subject to further review and approval by the Department of Finance or the California State Controller. Description of the Series 2017 Bonds The Series 2017 Bonds will be issued in denominations of $5,000 or any integral multiple of $5,000, will be dated the date of delivery thereof, and will mature on August 1 of the years and in the amounts set forth on the inside cover page hereof. Interest on the Series 2017 Bonds is payable at the respective interest rates set forth on the inside cover page hereof, on February 1 and August 1 of each year (each an “Interest Payment Date”), commencing [February 1, 2018]. The Series 2017 Bonds, when issued, will be registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of The Depository Trust Company, New York, New York (“DTC,” together with any successor securities depository, the “Securities Depository”). DTC will act as Securities Depository for the Series 2017 Bonds. Individual purchases will be made only in book-entry form. Purchasers will not receive physical certificates representing their beneficial ownership interest in the Series 2017 Bonds. So long as the Series 2017 Bonds are registered in the name of Cede & Co., (i) payment of the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Series 2017 Bonds will be payable to DTC or its nominee, and (ii) all reference herein to the holders or the owners of the Series 2017 Bonds, or the Series 2017 Bondowners or Series 2017 Bondholders means DTC and not the beneficial owners of the Series 2017 Bonds. DTC in turn will remit such payments to DTC Participants for subsequent disbursement to the Beneficial Owners. See APPENDIX G–“DTC AND THE BOOK-ENTRY ONLY SYSTEM.” Each Series 2017 Bonds will bear interest from the Interest Payment Date next preceding the date of authentication thereof, unless (i) it is authenticated after a Record Date (defined herein) and on or before the following Interest Payment Date, in which event it shall bear interest from such Interest Payment Date; or (ii) the Series 2017 Bonds are authenticated on or before January 15, 2018, in which event they shall bear interest from their date of delivery; provided, however, that if, as of the date of authentication of the Series 2017 Bonds, interest thereon is in default, the Series 2017 Bonds shall bear interest from the Interest Payment Date to which interest has previously been paid or made available for payment thereon. Principal of, and redemption premium, if any, on the Series 2017 Bonds is payable at the Principal Corporate Trust Office of the Trustee. Interest on the Series 2017 Bonds will be paid by the Trustee only to the registered owners as shown on the Trustee‟s books as of the fifteenth da y of the calendar month next preceding each interest payment date (each a “Record Date”), except that in the case of an owner of $1,000,000 or more in principal amount of Series 2017 Bonds outstanding, payment will June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 393 11 be made at the owner‟s option by wire transfer of immediately available funds according to instructions provided by such owner to the Trustee and received no later than the Record Date for such interest payment date. Redemption Provisions Series 2017A Bonds Optional Redemption of Series 2017A Bonds. The Series 2017A Bonds maturing on or before August 1, 20__, are not subject to optional redemption prior to maturity. The Series 2017A Bonds maturing on or after August 1, 20__, are subject to redemption at the option of the Successor Agency on any date on or after August 1, _____, as a whole or in part, by such maturities as determined by the Successor Agency (and, in lieu of such determination, pro rata among maturities), and by lot within a maturity, from any available source of funds, at a redemption price equal to the principal amount thereof, together with accrued interest to the date fixed for redemption, without premium. Sinking Account Redemption of Series 2017A Bonds. The Series 2017A Bonds maturing on August 1, 20__ (“20__ Series 2017A Term Bonds”), are subject to mandatory redemption from Sinking Account payments set forth in the following schedule on August 1, _____, and on each August 1 thereafter, to and including August 1, _____, at a redemption price equal to the principal amount thereof to be redeemed (without premium), together with interest accrued thereon to the date fixed for redemption; provided, however, that if some but not all of the 20__ Series 2017A Term Bonds have been subject to optional redemption, the total amount of Sinking Account payments to be made subsequent to such optional redemption will be reduced in an amount equal to the principal amount of the 20__ Series 2017A Term Bonds so redeemed by reducing each such future Sinking Account payment on a pro rata basis (as nearly as practicable) in integral multiples of $5,000, as shall be designated pursuant to a written notice of the Successor Agency filed with the Trustee. 20__ Series 2017A Term Bonds Redemption Date (August 1) Principal Amount The Series 2017A Bonds maturing on August 1, 20__ (“20__ Series 2017A Term Bonds”), are subject to mandatory redemption from Sinking Account payments set forth in the following schedule on August 1, _____, and on each August 1 thereafter, to and including August 1, _____, at a redemption price equal to the principal amount thereof to be redeemed (without premium), together with interest accrued thereon to the date fixed for redemption; provided, however, that if some but not all of the 20__ Series 2017A Term Bonds have been subject to optional redemption, the total amount of Sinking Account payments to be made subsequent to such optional redemption will be reduced in an amount equal to the principal amount of the 20__ Series 2017A Term Bonds so redeemed by reducing each such future Sinking Account payment on a pro rata basis (as nearly as practicable) in integral multiples of $5,000, as shall be designated pursuant to a written notice of the Successor Agency filed with the Trustee. 20__ Series 2017A Term Bonds Redemption Date (August 1) Principal Amount June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 394 12 Series 2017B Bonds Optional Redemption of Series 2017B Bonds. The Series 2017B Bonds maturing on or before August 1, 20__, are not subject to optional redemption prior to maturity. The Series 2017B Bonds maturing on or after August 1, 20__, are subject to redemption at the option of the Successor Agency on any date on or after August 1, 20__, as a whole or in part, by such maturities as determined by the Successor Agency (and, in lieu of such determination, pro rata among maturities), and by lot within a maturity, from any available source of funds, at a redemption price equal to the principal amount thereof, together with accrued interest to the date fixed for redemption, without premium. Redemption Procedures Selection of Series 2017 Bonds for Redemption. If less than all of the Series 2017 Bonds of a series then currently Outstanding are called for redemption, the Trustee will select Series 2017 Bonds of a series for redemption from Series 2017 Bonds of such series then currently Outstanding and not previously called for redemption, at the written direction of the Successor Agency in such order of maturity as shall be designated by the Successor Agency, and in the absence of such direction, pro rata among maturities and by lot within a maturity. The Trustee will promptly notify the Successor Agency in writing of the Series 2017 Bonds so selected for redemption. Notice of Redemption. Notice of redemption shall be mailed by first-class mail by the Trustee on behalf of and at the expense of the Successor Agency, not less than 20 (or, if more, such minimum number of days as may be required by the Securities Depositories) but not more than 60 days prior to the redemption date to: (i) the Owners of any Series 2017 Bonds designated for redemption at their respective addresses appearing on the Registration Books, and (ii) to the Securities Depositories and to the Information Services designated in a Written Request of the Successor Agency filed with the Trustee at the time the Successor Agency notifies the Trustee of its intention to redeem Series 2017 Bonds; but such mailing will not be a condition precedent to such redemption and neither failure to receive any such notice nor any defect therein will affect the validity of the proceedings for the redemption of such Series 2017 Bonds or the cessation of the accrual of interest thereon. Such notice will state the redemption date and the redemption price, will designate the series and CUSIP number of the Series 2017 Bonds to be redeemed, state the individual number of each Series 2017 Bond to be redeemed or state that all Series 2017 Bonds between two stated numbers (both inclusive) or all of the Series 2017 Bonds Outstanding of a series (or all Series 2017 Bonds of a maturity of a series) are to be redeemed, and will require that such Series 2017 Bonds be then surrendered (except for mandatory Sinking Account redemptions) at the Principal Corporate Trust Office of the Trustee for redemption at the said redemption price, giving notice also that further interest on such Series 2017 Bonds will not accrue from and after the redemption date. Conditional Notice of Optional Redemption. In the case of an optional redemption of a series of Series 2017 Bonds, the notice of redemption may also state that the redemption is conditioned upon receipt by the Trustee of sufficient moneys to redeem the applicable Series 2017 Bonds on the anticipated redemption date, and that the optional redemption will not occur if, by no later than the scheduled redemption date, sufficient moneys to redeem such Series 2017 Bonds have not been deposited with the Trustee. If the Trustee does not receive sufficient funds by the scheduled optional redemption date to so redeem the Series 2017 Bonds to be optionally redeemed, such event will not constitute an Event of Default; the Trustee is required to send written notice to the Owners to the effect that the redemption did June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 395 13 not occur as anticipated, and Series 2017 Bonds for which notice of optional redemption was given will remain Outstanding for all purposes of the Indenture. Effect of Redemption. From and after the date fixed for redemption, if funds available for the payment of the redemption price of and interest on the Series 2017 Bonds of a series so called for redemption shall have been duly deposited with the Trustee, such Series 2017 Bonds so called will cease to be entitled to any benefit under the Indenture other than the right to receive payment of the redemption price and accrued interest to the redemption date, and no interest will accrue thereon from and after the redemption date specified in such notice. Manner of Redemption. Whenever any Series 2017 Bonds or portions thereof are to be selected for redemption by lot, the Trustee is required to make such selection, in such manner as the Trustee deems appropriate, and to notify the Successor Agency thereof. All Series 2017 Bonds redeemed or purchased pursuant to the Indenture will be canceled and destroyed as provided therein. PROPERTY TAX REVENUE FINANCING UNDER THE DISSOLUTION ACT General Property Tax Revenues Under the Dissolution Act. The Dissolution Act requires the county auditor-controller to determine the amount of property taxes that would have been allocated to the former agency had the former agency not been dissolved pursuant to the Dissolution Act using current assessed values on the last equalized roll on August 20, and to deposit that amount in the redevelopment property tax trust fund for the successor agency established and held by the county auditor-controller pursuant to the Dissolution Act. The redevelopment property tax trust fund is administered by the county auditor- controller for the benefit of the holders of enforceable obligations and the taxing entities that receive pass- through payments and property tax distributions. Any bonds authorized under the Dissolution Act to be issued by a successor agency will be considered indebtedness incurred by the dissolved former agency, with the same legal effect as if the bonds had been issued prior to effective date of the Dissolution Act, in full conformity with the applicable provisions of the Law that existed prior to that date, and will be included in the ROPS of the successor agency. See “–Recognized Obligation Payment Schedules.” The Dissolution Act authorizes the issuance of refunding bonds by successor agencies to be secured by a pledge of monies deposited from time to time in a redevelopment property tax trust fund held by a county auditor-controller with respect to a successor agency, which are equivalent to the tax increment revenues that were formerly allocated under the Law to the former redevelopment agency and authorized under the Law to be used for the financing of former redevelopment projects, less amounts deducted pursuant to Section 34183(a) of the Dissolution Act for permitted administrative costs of the county auditor-controller. Successor agencies have no power to levy property taxes and must look specifically to the allocation of taxes as described in the Law. See “CERTAIN RISKS TO BONDOWNERS.” Pursuant to Section 33670(b) of the Law, Article XVI, Section 16 of the Constitution of the State and as provided in redevelopment plans, taxes levied upon taxable property in the project area each year by or for the benefit of the State, any city, county, city and county, district, or other public corporation (herein sometimes collectively called “taxing agencies”) after the effective date of the ordinance approving the redevelopment plan, or the respective effective dates of ordinances approving amendments to the redevelopment plan that added territory to the project area, as applicable, are to be divided as follows: June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 396 14 (a) To Taxing Agencies: That portion of the taxes which would be produced by the rate upon which the tax is levied each year by or for each of the taxing agencies upon the total sum of the assessed value of the taxable property in the applicable project area as shown upon the assessment roll used in connection with the taxation of such property by such taxing agency last equalized prior to the effective date of the ordinance adopting the applicable redevelopment plan, or the respective effective dates of ordinances approving amendments to the applicable redevelopment plan that added territory to the applicable project area, as applicable (each, a “base year valuation”), will be allocated to, and when collected will be paid into, the funds of the respective taxing agencies as taxes on all other property are paid; and (b) To the Former Agency/Successor Agency: Except for that portion of the taxes in excess of the amount identified in (a) above which are attributable to a tax rate levied by a taxing agency for the purpose of producing revenues in an amount sufficient to make annual repayments of the principal of, and the interest on, any bonded indebtedness approved by the voters of the taxing agency on or after January 1, 1989 for the acquisition or improvement of real property, which portion shall be allocated to, and when collected shall be paid into, the fund of that taxing agency, that portion of the levied taxes each year in excess of such amount, annually allocated within the applicable plan limit following the delivery date, when collected will be paid into a special fund of the former agency. Section 34172 of the Dissolution Act provides that, for purposes of Article XVI, Section 16 of the State Constitution, the redevelopment property tax trust fund shall be deemed to be a special fund of the successor agency to pay the debt service on indebtedness incurred by the former agency or the successor agency to finance or refinance the redevelopment projects of the former agency. Prior to the dissolution of redevelopment agencies, tax increment revenues from one project area could not be used to repay indebtedness incurred for another project area. However, the Dissolution Act only requires each county auditor-controller to establish a single redevelopment property tax trust fund with respect to each former redevelopment agency within the respective county and does not require funds derived from separate project areas of a former redevelopment agency to be segregated. All of the obligations of the Project Areas are secured by the Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund held by the County Auditor-Controller, although property tax revenues continue to be calculated by individual Project Area. Recognized Obligation Payment Schedules ROPS Process Under the Dissolution Act. The Dissolution Act requires successor agencies to prepare and submit to the successor agency‟s oversight board and the Department of Finance for approval a recognized obligation payment schedule (a “ROPS”) pursuant to which enforceable obligations (as defined in the Dissolution Act) of the successor agency are listed, together with the source of funds to be used to pay for each “enforceable obligation.” As of February 1, 2016, successor agencies are required to file a ROPS annually with the Department of Finance and the county auditor-controller for approval on or before each February 1 for the July 1 through June 30 period immediately following such February 1. For example, on February 1, 2017, the Successor Agency was required to file a ROPS for the period commencing July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018. In addition, commencing on September 22, 2015, successor agencies that have received a Finding of Completion and the concurrence of the Department of Finance as to the items that qualify for payment, June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 397 15 among other conditions, may at their option, file a “Last and Final” ROPS. If approved by the Department of Finance, the Last and Final ROPS will be binding on all parties, and the successor agency will no longer submit an annual ROPS to the Department of Finance or the oversight board. The county auditor- controller will remit the authorized funds to the successor agency in accordance with the approved Last and Final ROPS until each remaining enforceable obligation has been fully paid. A Last and Final ROPS may only be amended twice, and only with approval of the Department of Finance and the county auditor- controller. The Successor Agency has no current plans to submit a Last and Final ROPS. Priority of Distribution from the Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund. The Dissolution Act establishes a specific flow of funds for the administration by county auditor-controllers of the redevelopment property tax trust fund. Under Health and Safety Code Section 34183, after deducting certain administrative costs due to the county, the county auditor controller is required to allocate money in the redevelopment property tax trust fund as follows: (i) No later than each January 2 and June 1, subject to certain adjustment for subordination of pass-through obligations as permitted under the Dissolution Act (as further described below), to each local taxing agency and school district to the extent applicable, amounts required for pass-through payments such taxing agency would have received under the provisions of the Law, as those sections read on January 1, 2011, including negotiated pass-through agreements and statutory pass-through obligations. See LIMITATIONS ON TAX REVENUES AND POSSIBLE SPENDING LIMITATIONS–Statutory Tax-Sharing Payments.” (ii) On each January 2 and June 1, to the successor agency for payments listed on the successor agency‟s ROPS, with debt service payments (and amounts required to replenish the related reserves, if any) scheduled to be made for tax allocation bonds having the highest priority over payments scheduled for other debts and obligations listed on the ROPS. (iii) On each January 2 and June 1, to the successor agency for the administrative cost allowance (as defined in the Dissolution Act). (iv) On each January 2 and June 1, to the taxing entities any moneys remaining in the Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund after the payments and transfers described in clauses (i) to (iii) in an amount proportionate to such taxing entities share of property tax revenues in the tax rate area in the fiscal year (without giving effect to any pass-through obligations that were established under the Law). Payment of Amounts Listed on the ROPS. As defined in the Dissolution Act, “enforceable obligation” includes, in relevant part, bonds, including the required debt service, reserve set-asides, and any other payments required under the indenture or similar documents governing the issuance of the outstanding bonds of the former redevelopment agency or any authorized refunding thereof. A reserve may be included on the ROPS and held by the successor agency when required by the bond indenture or when the next property tax allocation will be insufficient to pay all obligations due under the provisions of the bond for the next payment due in the following half of the calendar year. See APPENDIX D– “SUMMARY OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE INDENTURE–Covenants of the Successor Agency– Processing ROPs.” Sources of Payment for the ROPS. Under the Dissolution Act, the categories of sources of payments for enforceable obligations listed on a ROPS are the following: (i) the former low and moderate income housing fund, (ii) bond proceeds, (iii) reserve balances, (iv) administrative cost allowance (a successor agency is entitled to receive not less than $250,000 unless such amount is reduced by the Oversight Board), (v) the redevelopment property tax trust fund (but only to the extent no other funding June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 398 16 source is available or when payment from property tax revenues is required by an enforceable obligation or otherwise required under the Dissolution Act), or (vi) other revenue sources (including rents, concessions, asset sale proceeds, interest earnings, and any other revenues derived from the former redevelopment agency, as approved by the oversight board). The Dissolution Act provides that only payments listed in the ROPS may be made by the successor agency from the funds specified in the ROPS. Failure to Submit a ROPS. There are strong incentives for a successor agency to submit its ROPS on time. If a successor agency does not submit a ROPS to the oversight board, the county auditor- controller and the Department of Finance on or before each February 1 commencing February 1, 2016 (unless successor agency submits and obtains approval from the Department of Finance of a Last and Final ROPS), then the city or county that created the former redevelopment agency, if acting as the successor agency is subject to a $10,000 per day civil penalty for every day the schedule is not submitted to the Department of Finance. See “PROPERTY TAX REVENUE FINANCING UNDER THE DISSOLUTION ACT–Recognized Obligation Payment Schedules” for discussion regarding submission of Last and Final ROPS. Additionally, if the successor agency does not submit a ROPS to the oversight board and the Department of Finance within 10 days of the deadline, then the successor agency‟s maximum administrative cost allowance may be reduced by up to 25%. For additional information regarding procedures under the Dissolution Act relating to late ROPS and implications for the Series 2017 Bonds, see “RISK FACTORS–Recognized Obligation Payment Schedules.” To date, the Successor Agency has timely submitted all required ROPS to the Department of Finance. [Moved] Pass-Through Payments. The Law recognizes three types of pass-through payments to affected taxing entities: (i) Section 33401 negotiated tax-sharing payments for redevelopment areas that existed prior to January 1, 1994; (ii) from 1985 through 1993, Section 33676 inflationary pass-through payments; and (iii) statutory pass-through payments pursuant Sections 33607.5 and/or 33607.7. The Law authorized redevelopment agencies to make payments to school districts and other taxing agencies to alleviate any financial burden or detriments to such taxing agencies caused by a redevelopment project. Section 33607.5 and 33607.7 of the Law required mandatory tax sharing applicable to redevelopment projects adopted after January 1, 1994, or amended thereafter in certain manners specified in such statutes (the “AB 1290 Pass-Through Payments” or “Statutory Tax-Sharing Payments”). For a description of the Statutory Tax-Sharing Payments payable to taxing entities within the Project Areas, see “LIMITATIONS ON TAX REVENUES AND POSSIBLE SPENDING LIMITATIONS–Tax- Sharing Payments.” The Dissolution Act requires the county auditor-controller to distribute from the redevelopment property tax trust fund on each January 2 and June 1 the amounts required to be distributed for statutory pass-through amounts to the taxing entities for each six-month period before amounts are distributed by the county auditor-controller from the redevelopment property tax trust fund to the Redevelopment Obligation Retirement Fund of the successor agency, unless (i) pass-through payment obligations have previously been made subordinate to debt service payments for the bonded indebtedness of the former agency, as succeeded by the successor agency, (ii) the successor agency has reported, no later than the December 1 and May 1 preceding the January 2 or June 1 distribution date, that the total amount available to the successor agency from the redevelopment property tax trust fund allocation to the Redevelopment Obligation Retirement Fund of the successor agency, from other funds transferred from the former agency, and from funds that have or will become available through asset sales and all redevelopment operations is insufficient to fund the enforceable obligations, pass-through payments of the successor agency, and the administrative cost allowance of the successor agency for the applicable June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 399 17 six-month period, and (iii) the State Controller has concurred with the successor agency that there are insufficient funds for such purposes for the applicable six-month period. If the requirements stated in clauses (i) through (iii) of the foregoing paragraph have been met, the Dissolution Act provides for certain modifications in the distributions otherwise calculated to be distributed for such six-month period. To provide for calculated shortages to be paid to the successor agency for enforceable obligations, the amount of the deficiency will first be deducted from the residual amount otherwise calculated to be distributed to the taxing entities under the Dissolution Act after payment of the enforceable obligations, pass-through payments, and the administrative cost allowance of the successor agency. If such residual amount is exhausted, the amount of the remaining deficiency will be deducted from amounts available for distribution to the successor agency for administrative costs for the applicable six-month period in order to fund the enforceable obligations. Finally, funds required for servicing bond debt may be deducted from the amounts to be distributed for Statutory Tax-Sharing Payments if such Statutory Tax-Sharing Payments were subordinated to the debt service on enforceable obligations, in order to be paid to the successor agency for enforceable obligations, but only after the amounts described in the previous two sentences have been exhausted. The Successor Agency cannot guarantee that this process prescribed by the Dissolution Act of administering the Tax Revenues and the subordinations obtained for the Statutory Tax-Sharing Payments will effectively result in sufficient Tax Revenues for the payment of principal and interest on the Series 2017 Bonds when due. See “–Recognized Obligation Payment Schedules.” Elimination of Housing Set-Aside Before it was amended by the Dissolution Act, the Law required the Former Agency to set aside not less than 20% of all tax increment generated in the Redevelopment Project Areas into a low and moderate income housing fund to be used for the purpose of increasing, improving and/or preserving the supply of low and moderate income housing. These tax increment revenues were commonly referred to as “Housing Set-Aside.” The Dissolution Act eliminated the Housing Set-Aside requirement. Since a deduction for the Housing Set-Aside is no longer required, amounts that were previously required to be deposited in the low and moderate income housing fund are now included in property taxes. No Plan Limits Prior to the Dissolution Act, redevelopment plans were required to include certain limits on the financing of the redevelopment projects. SB 107 clarifies that former tax increment limits set forth in redevelopment plans, such as the Redevelopment Plans, no longer apply for purposes of paying approved enforceable obligations such as the Series 2017 Bonds. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 400 18 SECURITY AND SOURCES OF PAYMENT FOR THE SERIES 2017 BONDS Pledge of Tax Revenues Property taxes levied within the Project Areas on that portion of the taxable valuation over and above the taxable valuation of the applicable base year property tax roll with respect to each Project Area will be deposited in the Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund and, to the extent they constitute Tax Revenues, will be transferred by the County Auditor-Controller to the Redevelopment Obligation Retirement Fund held by the Successor Agency on January 2 and June 1 of each year to the extent required for payments listed in the ROPS of the Successor Agency in accordance with the requirements of the Dissolution Act. See “PROPERTY TAX REVENUE FINANCING UNDER THE DISSOLUTION ACT– Recognized Obligation Payment Schedules” and “–Flow of Funds Under the Indenture.” Pursuant to the Indenture, the Successor Agency irrevocably grants a lien on and a security interest in, and pledges, the Tax Revenues and all money in the Debt Service Fund (including the Interest Account, the Principal Account, the Sinking Account and the Redemption Account therein), and the Redevelopment Obligation Retirement Fund, for the benefit of the Owners of the Outstanding Series 2017 Bonds. The Series 2017 Bonds (excluding any Parity Debt) are also secured by an exclusive pledge of, security interest in and lien on amounts in the Reserve Account. The lien on and security interest in and pledge of the Tax Revenues and such money in the Debt Service Fund and in the accounts or funds so specified and provided for in the Indenture constitutes a first pledge of and charge and lien upon the Tax Revenues and the moneys in such accounts and funds. See also See APPENDIX D–“SUMMARY OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE INDENTURE.” “Tax Revenues” is defined in the Indenture to mean, the moneys deposited from time to time in the Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund established pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 34170.5 of the Dissolution Act, as provided in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 34183 of the Dissolution Act, after payment of (i) County administrative fees pursuant to section 34183(a) of the Dissolution Act, (ii) the amounts required by the Revocable Grant Agreement, entered into as of November 1, 1998, between the Former Agency and Coggins Square Associates, a California Limited Partnership pursuant to which payments of $100,000 per year are made through Fiscal Year 2028-29 (the “Reimbursement Agreement”), and the Statutory Pass-Through Amounts, to the extent not subordinated to the use of Tax Revenues for the payment of amounts due under the Indenture. See “THE PROJECT AREAS–Adjustments to Tax Increment Revenues.” If, and to the extent, that the provisions of Section 34172 or Section 34183(a)(2) of the Dissolution Act are invalidated by a final judicial decision, then Tax Revenues will include all tax revenues allocated to the payment of indebtedness of the Successor Agency pursuant to Section 33670 of the Law or such other section as may be in effect at the time providing for the allocation of tax increment revenues in accordance with Article XVI, Section 16 of the California Constitution. The Successor Agency has no power to levy and collect taxes, and various factors beyond its control could affect the amount of Tax Revenues available to pay the principal of and interest on the Series 2017 Bonds. See “PROPERTY TAX REVENUE FINANCING UNDER THE DISSOLUTION ACT– Recognized Obligation Payment Schedules” and “CERTAIN RISKS TO BONDOWNERS.” The Series 2017 Bonds are special obligations of the Successor Agency. The Series 2017 Bonds are not a debt of the County, the State of California or any of its political subdivisions (other than the Successor Agency) and none of the County, the State of California or any of its political subdivisions (other than the Successor Agency) is liable therefor. In no event shall payment of the principal or redemption price of, or interest on the Series 2017 Bonds constitute a debt, liability or obligation of any public agency (other than the limited obligation of the Successor Agency as set forth in the Indenture). The Series 2017 Bonds do not constitute an indebtedness within the meaning of any constitutional or June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 401 19 statutory debt limitation or restriction, and none of the members of the Successor Agency Governing Board, the Oversight Board, the Board of Supervisors or any persons executing the Series 2017 Bonds are liable personally on the Series 2017 Bonds by reason of their issuance. The Successor Agency has no taxing power. Adjustments to Tax Increment Revenues The tax increment from the Project Areas is subject to certain adjustments and liens that are payable prior to payment of debt service on the Series 2017 Bonds. Property Tax Administrative Costs. In 1990, the State Legislature enacted Senate Bill No. 2557 (“SB 2557”) (Chapter 466, Statutes of 1990), codified in Section 97.5 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code, which allows counties to charge for the cost of assessing, collecting and allocating property tax revenues to local government jurisdictions on a prorated basis. Subsequent legislation clarified that the provisions of SB 2557 include redevelopment agencies as a local government agency which must pay such administrative costs. Since the enactment of SB 2557, the Successor Agency has had its tax increment reduced by the County for its pro rata share of property tax administrative costs. The estimated SB 2557 (property tax administrative costs) charges to the Successor Agency attributable to the Project Areas for Fiscal Year 2016-17 are $145,000, which is approximately 0.78% of projected Fiscal Year 2016-17 tax increment revenues, and is based on the percentage that actual administrative charges represented to total tax increment for the Project Areas in Fiscal Year 2015-16. For purposes of the projections of Tax Revenues in the Fiscal Consultant Report and in this Official Statement, the Fiscal Consultant assumed that the County property tax administrative costs as a percentage of Tax Revenues from the Project Areas would remain constant based upon the actual amount charged for Fiscal Year 2016-17. See “THE PROJECT AREAS–Projected Debt Service Coverage” and APPENDIX C–“FISCAL CONSULTANT REPORT.” The property tax administrative costs pursuant to SB 2557 are payable on a basis senior to payment of debt service on the Series 2017 Bonds. Section 33676 Allocations. Pursuant to Section 33676 of the Law (“Section 33676”), for project areas adopted prior to January 1994, taxing entities could elect to receive additional property taxes above the base year revenue amount. Such amounts are calculated by increasing the real property portion of base year values by an inflation factor of up to 2% annually. Taxing entities can receive a proportionate share of such revenues if they elected to do so prior to adoption of the redevelopment plan. Based on the decision in the case of Santa Ana Unified School District v. Orange County Development Agency, the County is also allocating Section 33676 revenues to all eligible school districts. Allocations pursuant to Section 33676 are made from each of the Project Areas as described below: Contra Costa Centre Project Area: The Redevelopment Plan for this Project Area provides for the allocation of the revenue calculated pursuant to Section 33676 to the taxing entities. Therefore, all of the taxing entities in the Original Project Area receive Section 33676 allocations. In the Amendment Area, approximately 65% of the total Section 33676 revenues are allocated. Three taxing entities receive negotiated tax-sharing payments pursuant to Section 33401 and are therefore not eligible to receive such revenues. North Richmond Project Area: Thirteen of the 21 taxing entities in this Project Area have elected to receive their share of the Section 33676 allocations. Approximately 81% of the total Section 33676 revenues are being allocated to the taxing entities. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 402 20 Bay Point Project Area: Seventeen of the 22 taxing entities in this Project Area have elected to receive their share of the Section 33676 allocations. Approximately 71% of the total Section 33676 revenues are being allocated to the taxing entities. One taxing entity receives negotiated tax-sharing payments pursuant to Section 33401 and is therefore not eligible to receive such revenues. Rodeo Project Area: Eight of the 21 taxing entities in this Project Area have elected to receive their share of the Section 33676 allocations in this Project Area. Approximately 45% of the total Section 33676 revenues are being allocated to the taxing entities. Four taxing entities receive negotiated tax-sharing payments pursuant to Section 33401 and are therefore not eligible to receive such revenues. Flow of Funds under the Indenture The Successor Agency has established a special trust fund (the “Redevelopment Obligation Retirement Fund”) pursuant to Section 34170.5 of the Dissolution Act. The Indenture establishes a special trust fund (the “Debt Service Fund”) that is held and maintained by the Trustee. The Successor Agency will deposit all Tax Revenues received in any Bond Year in the Redevelopment Obligation Retirement Fund promptly upon receipt, and promptly thereafter transfer moneys to the Trustee for deposit in the Debt Service Fund in the amounts required under the Indenture. All moneys in the Debt Service Fund are required to be transferred by the Trustee for deposit in the following respective accounts within the Debt Service Fund, in the following order of priority: First: On or before the fifth Business Day preceding each Interest Payment Date, commencing with the February 1, 2018, Interest Payment Date, to the extent there are moneys available, the Trustee shall transfer funds from the Debt Service Fund for deposit in the Interest Account an amount which, when added to the amount contained in the Interest Account on that date, will be equal to the aggregate amount of the interest becoming due and payable on the Outstanding Bonds and Parity Debt on such Interest Payment Date. No such transfer and deposit need be made to the Interest Account if the amount contained therein is at least equal to the interest to become due on such Interest Payment Date upon all of the Outstanding Bonds and Parity Debt. Subject to the Indenture, all moneys in the Interest Account will be used and withdrawn by the Trustee solely for the purpose of paying the interest on the Series 2017 Bonds and Parity Debt as it becomes due and payable (including accrued interest on any Series 2017 Bonds and Parity Debt redeemed prior to maturity pursuant to the Indenture). Second: On or before the fifth Business Day preceding each Interest Payment Date, commencing with the February 1, 2018, Interest Payment Date, to the extent there are monies available, the Trustee is required to transfer funds from the Debt Service Fund for deposit in the Principal Account an amount equal to one-half of the principal payments coming due and payable on the Outstanding Series 2017 Bonds and any Parity Debt on the next August 1. No such transfer and deposit need be made to the Principal Account if the amount contained therein is at least equal to the principal to become due on the next August 1 on all Outstanding Series 2017 Bonds and any Parity Debt. All moneys in the Principal Account will be used and withdrawn by the Trustee solely for the purpose of paying the principal of the Series 2017 Bonds and any Parity Debt as it becomes due and payable. Third: On or before the fifth Business Day preceding each Interest Payment Date, commencing with the first such date which is six months prior to the date on which principal (or any mandatory sinking payment) is due on any Term Bonds, to the extent there are moneys June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 403 21 available, the Trustee is required to transfer funds from the Debt Service Fund for deposit in the Sinking Account an amount equal to one-half of the sinking account payments becoming due and payable on any Series 2017 Bonds and Parity Debt that constitute Term Bonds on the next August 1, to the extent monies on deposit in the Debt Service Fund are available therefor. No such transfer and deposit need be made to the Sinking Account if the amount contained therein is at least equal to the sinking account payments to become due on the next August 1 on all Outstanding Series 2017 Bonds and Parity Debt that constitute Term Bonds. Subject to the Indenture, all moneys in the Sinking Account will be used and withdrawn by the Trustee solely for the purpose of paying the aggregate principal amount of the Term Bonds and term bonds relating to Parity Debt required to be redeemed on such August 1 pursuant to the provisions of the document providing for the issuance of any Parity Debt that constitutes Term Bonds. Fourth: The Reserve Requirement as of the date of issuance of the Series 2017 Bonds is expected to be satisfied by the municipal bond debt service reserve policy (the “Reserve Policy”) provided by _________________ (the “Municipal Bond Insurer”) and not by any deposit of cash in the Reserve Account. The Successor Agency has no obligation to replace the Reserve Policy or to fund the Reserve Account with cash if, at any time the Series 2017 Bonds are outstanding, amounts are unavailable under the Reserve Policy. In the event moneys on deposit in the Debt Service Fund on any Interest Payment Date are less than the full amount of the interest and principal payments required to be deposited by the Trustee in order to pay the scheduled debt service on the Series 2017 Bonds, the Trustee will draw on the Reserve Policy an amount equal to any such deficiency and will notify the Successor Agency of any such withdrawal. The Reserve Policy can only be drawn upon to make payments on the Series 2017 Bonds (and not on any Parity Debt) in the event of a shortfall in amounts in the Debt Service Fund available to pay the scheduled debt service on the Series 2017 Bonds. Fifth: On or before the fifth Business Day preceding any date on which Bonds are, or any Parity Debt is, to be optionally redeemed, the Trustee is required to withdraw from the Debt Service Fund and transfer to the Redemption Account (which the Trustee is required to establish and hold in trust under the Indenture) an amount required to pay the principal of and premium, if any, on the Series 2017 Bonds and any Parity Debt to be redeemed on such date, taking into account any funds then on deposit in the Redemption Account. The Trustee shall also deposit in the Redemption Account any other amounts received by it from the Successor Agency designated by the Successor Agency in writing to be deposited in the Redemption Account. All moneys in the Redemption Account shall be used and withdrawn by the Trustee solely for the purpose of paying the principal of and premium, if any, on the Series 2017 Bonds and any Parity Debt to be redeemed on the respective dates set for such redemption. Reserve Account General. A Reserve Account within the Debt Service Fund is established under the Indenture as security for the Series 2017 Bonds (the “Reserve Account”) in an amount equal to the “Reserve Requirement,” which, as of any date of calculation, is an amount equal to the least of (i) Maximum Annual Debt Service for then current or every subsequent Bond Year, (b) 125% of average Annual Debt Service for then current or every subsequent Bond Year, and (c) 10% of the original principal amount of the Series 2017 Bonds and any Parity Debt. On the Closing Date, the Reserve Requirement for the Series 2017 Bonds is calculated to be $________. On the date of delivery of the Series 2017 Bonds, proceeds in the amount of the Reserve Requirement or, a municipal debt service reserve policy in the amount of the Reserve Account will be June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 404 22 deposited in the Reserve Requirement. See also APPENDIX D–“SUMMARY OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE INDENTURE.” If, on any Interest Payment Date, the moneys available in the Interest Account, the Principal Account and the Sinking Account do not equal the amount of the principal or interest on the Series 2017 Bonds (not including any Parity Debt) then coming due and payable, the Trustee is required to apply the moneys available in the Reserve Account to make delinquent amounts by transferring the amount necessary for this purpose to the Interest Account, the Principal Account and/or the Sinking Account or draw on the Reserve Policy and apply amounts received from such draw to make delinquent amounts by transferring the amount necessary for this purpose to the Interest Account, the Principal Account and/or the Sinking Account. To the extent there is cash or investments on deposit in the Reserve Account, such cash or investments are required to be applied first before there is any draw on the Reserve Policy or any other credit facility credited to the Reserve Account in lieu of cash (a “Credit Facility”). Payment of any Policy Costs (defined in the Indenture) are required to be made prior to replenishment of any such cash amounts. Draws on all Credit Facilities (including the Reserve Policy) on which there is available coverage shall be made on a pro rata basis (calculated by reference to the coverage then available thereunder) after applying all available cash and investments in the Reserve Account. Payment of Policy Costs and reimbursement of amounts with respect to other Credit Facilities shall be made on a pro rata basis prior to replenishment of any cash drawn from the Reserve Account. The term “available coverage” is defined in the Indenture to mean the coverage then available for disbursement pursuant to the terms o f the applicable Credit Facility without regard to the legal or financial ability or willingness of the provider of such instrument to honor a claim or draw thereon or the failure of the provider thereof to honor any such claim or draw. Upon receipt of any delinquent amount with respect to which moneys have been advanced from the Reserve Account or there has been a draw on the Reserve Policy, such amount is required to be deposited in the Reserve Account to the extent of such advance and first applied to reimburse a draw on the Reserve Policy and then to replenish any cash drawn therefrom. The Successor Agency is under no obligation to replace the Reserve Policy or to fund the Reserve Account with cash if, at any time the Series 2017 Bonds are outstanding, (i) amounts are unavailable under the Reserve Policy or (ii) the rating assigned to the Municipal Bond Insurer by any rating agency is downgraded, suspended or withdrawn at any time. Covenant of the Successor Agency to Process ROPS Pursuant to the Indenture, the Successor Agency covenants and agrees, among other things, that it will take all actions required under the Dissolution Act to include in the ROPS for each ROPS Period scheduled debt service on the Series 2017 Bonds and any Parity Debt (including, without limitation, any mandatory redemption payments), as well as any amount required to replenish the Reserve Account of the Debt Service Fund or to pay any amounts owing to the Municipal Bond Insurer, all so as to enable the County Auditor-Controller to distribute from the Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund to the Redevelopment Obligation Retirement Fund on each RPTTF Distribution Date amounts required for the Successor Agency to pay principal of, and interest on, the Series 2017 Bonds and any Parity Debt, and any amounts owing to the Municipal Bond Insurer coming due in the respective ROPS Payment Period corresponding to such RPTTF Distribution Date pursuant to the Dissolution Act (including but not limited to Section 34177 therein). The Successor Agency additionally covenants and agrees in the Indenture that not later than February 1, 2019 and each February 1 thereafter (or at such other time as may be required by the Dissolution Act) for so long as any Series 2017 Bonds or any Parity Debt remain outstanding, the Successor Agency will submit to the Department of Finance and to the County‟s Auditor -Controller an Oversight Board-approved ROPS that provides for the distribution of the following amounts (but only to June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 405 23 the extent that other amounts on deposit in the Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund or the Redevelopment Obligation Retirement Fund reserved for payment of debt service on the Series 2017 Bonds or any Parity Debt or on deposit in the Debt Service Fund or in the debt service fund or similar fund relating to such other debt are insufficient therefor): (i) for distribution on each June 1: (A) all interest coming due and payable on the Series 2017 Bonds and any Parity Debt on the next succeeding August 1, and (B) 50% of the principal amount coming due and payable on the Bonds and any Parity Debt on the next August 1; and (ii) for distribution on each January 2: (A) all interest coming due and payable on the Bonds and any Parity Debt on the next succeeding February 1, and (B) 50% of the principal amount coming due and payable on the Series 2017 Bonds and any Parity Debt on the next August 1; (iii) if the Successor Agency determines it is necessary to ensure timely payment of debt service on the Bonds or any Parity Debt, the Successor Agency may also collect on each January 2 or June 1, as necessary, a reserve to be held for debt service on the Series 2017 Bonds and any Parity Debt on February 1 and August 1 of the next succeeding calendar year; and (iv) any amounts required to replenish the Reserve Account, any other reserve account established under any Parity Debt instrument, and any amounts due and owing to the Municipal Bond Insurer. In addition, the Successor Agency covenants that, if the amount of Tax Revenues expected to be available with respect to a ROPS Payment Period will be insufficient to pay required debt service on the Bonds and any Parity Debt and all other required amounts payable from the Redevelopment Obligation Retirement Fund during such ROPS Payment Period, it shall, on or before the May 1 or December 1, as applicable, preceding such ROPS Payment Period (or such other date as otherwise may be specified in the Dissolution Act), file a Notice of Insufficiency with the County Auditor-Controller in accordance with the Dissolution Act (including, but not limited to, paragraph (b) of Section 34183 therein). For additional covenants of the Successor Agency under the Indenture, see APPENDIX D– “SUMMARY OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE INDENTURE–Covenants of the Successor Agency.” No Additional Debt Other than Refunding Bonds In addition to the Series 2017 Bonds, the Successor Agency may issue or incur Parity Debt only to refund the Series 2017 Bonds or other Parity Debt in such principal amount as is determined by the Successor Agency, pursuant to a separate or Supplemental Indenture adopted or entered into by the Successor Agency and Trustee. LIMITATIONS ON TAX REVENUES AND POSSIBLE SPENDING LIMITATIONS Article XIII A of the California Constitution California voters, on June 6, 1978, approved an amendment (commonly known as Proposition 13) to the California Constitution. This amendment, which added Article XIII A to the California Constitution, among other things affects the valuation of real property for the purpose of taxation in that it defines the full cash property value to mean “the county assessor‟s valuation of real property as shown on the 1975-76 tax bill under „full cash value‟, or thereafter, the appraised value of real property when purchased, newly constructed, or a change in ownership has occurred after the 1975 assessment.” The full cash value may be adjusted annually to reflect inflation at a rate not to exceed 2% per year, a reduction in the consumer price index or comparable local data, or declining property value caused by damage, destruction or other factors including a general economic downturn. The amendment further limits the amount of any ad valorem tax on real property to 1% of the full cash value except that additional taxes may be levied to pay debt service on (i) indebtedness approved by the voters prior to July 1, 1978, (ii) bonded indebtedness for the acquisition or improvement of real property approved on or after July 1, 1978 by two-thirds of the votes cast by the voters voting on such indebtedness, and June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 406 24 (iii) bonded indebtedness incurred by a school district or community college district for the construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation or replacement of school facilities or the acquisition or lease of real property for school facilities, approved by 55% of the voters of the district, but only if certain accountability measures are included in the proposition. In the general election held November 4, 1986, voters of the State of California approved two measures, Propositions 58 and 60, which further amend Article XIII A. Proposition 58 amends Article XIII A to provide that the terms “purchased” and “change of ownership,” for purposes of determining full cash value of property under Article XIII A, do not include the purchase or transfer of (1) real property between spouses and (2) the principal residence and the first $1,000,000 of other property between parents and children. Proposition 60 amends Article XIII A to permit the Legislature to allow persons over age 55 who sell their residence to buy or build another of equal or lesser value within two years in the same county, and to transfer the old residence‟s assessed value to the new residence. Pursuant to Proposition 60, the Legislature has enacted legislation permitting counties to implement the provisions of Proposition 60. Challenges to Article XIII A. On September 22, 1978, the California Supreme Court upheld the amendment over challenges on several state and federal constitutional grounds (Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of Equalization). The Court reserved certain constitutional issues and the validity of legislation implementing the amendment for future determination in proper cases. Since 1978, several cases have been decided interpreting various provisions of Article XIII A; however, none of them have questioned the ability of redevelopment agencies to use tax allocation financing. The United States Supreme Court upheld the validity of the assessment procedures of Article XIII A in Nordlinger v. Hahn. The Successor Agency cannot predict whether there will be any future challenges to California‟s present system of property tax assessment and cannot evaluate the ultimate effect on the Successor Agency‟s receipt of Tax Revenues should a future decision hold unconstitutional the method of assessing property. Implementing Legislation. Legislation enacted by the California Legislature to implement Article XIII A provides that all taxable property is shown at full assessed value as described above. In conformity with this procedure, all taxable property value included in this Official Statement (except as noted) is shown at 100% of assessed value and all general tax rates reflect the $1.00 per $100 of taxable value. Tax rates for voter approved bonded indebtedness and pension liability are also applied to 100% of assessed value. Future assessed valuation growth allowed under Article XIII A (new construction, change of ownership, 2% annual value growth) will be allocated on the basis of “situs” among the jurisdictions that serve the tax rate area within which the growth occurs, except for certain utility property assessed by the State Board of Equalization. Local agencies and school districts will share the growth of “base” revenue from the tax rate area. Each year‟s growth allocation becomes part of each agency‟s allocation the following year. The Successor Agency is unable to predict the nature or magnitude of future revenue sources which may be provided by the State of California to replace lost property tax revenues. Article XIII A effectively prohibits the levying of any other ad valorem property tax above the 1% limit except for taxes to support indebtedness approved by the voters as described above. Litigation Relating to Property Assessments. Section 51 of the Revenue and Taxation Code permits county assessors who have reduced the assessed valuation of a property as a result of natural disasters, economic downturns or other factors, to subsequently “recapture” such value (up to the pre - June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 407 25 decline value of the property) at an annual rate higher than 2% even though the properties have not changed hands, depending on the assessor‟s measure of the restoration of value of the damaged property. The California courts have upheld the constitutionality of this procedure. Article XIII B of the California Constitution On November 6, 1979, California voters approved Proposition 4, which added Article XIII B to the California Constitution. Propositions 98 and 111, approved by the California voters in 1988 and 1990 respectively, substantially modify Article XIII B. The principal effect of Article XIII B is to limit the annual appropriations of the State and any city, county, school district, authority or other political subdivision of the State to the level of appropriations for the prior fiscal year, as adjusted for changes in the cost of living, population and services rendered by the government entity. The initial version of Article XIII B provided that the “base year” for establishing an appropriations limit was the 1978 -79 Fiscal Year, which was then adjusted annually to reflect changes in population, consumer prices and certain increases in the cost of services provided by these public agencies. Proposition 111 revised the method for making annual adjustments to the appropriations limit by redefining changes in the cost of living and in population. It also required that beginning in Fiscal Year 1990-91, each appropriations limit must be recalculated using the actual Fiscal Year 1986-87 appropriations limit and making the applicable annual adjustments as if the provisions of Proposition 111 had been in effect. Appropriations subject to limitation of a local government under Article XIII B generally include any authorization to expend during a fiscal year the proceeds of taxes levied by or for that entity and the proceeds of certain State subventions to that entity, exclusive of refunds of taxes. Proceeds of taxes include, but are not limited to, all tax revenues plus the proceeds to an entity of government from (1) regulatory licenses, user charges and user fees (but only to the extent such proceeds exceed the cost of providing the service or regulation), (2) the investment of tax revenues, and (3) certain subventions received from the State. As amended by Proposition 111, Article XIII B provides for testing of appropriations limits over consecutive two-year periods. If an entity‟s revenues in any two-year period exceed the amounts permitted to be spent over such period, the excess has to be returned by revising tax rates or fee schedules over the subsequent two years. As amended by Proposition 98, Article XIII B provides for the payment of a portion of any excess revenues to a fund established to assist in financing certain school needs. Effective September 30, 1980, the California Legislature added Section 33678 to the Law which provides that the allocation of taxes to a redevelopment agency for the purpose of paying principal of, or interest on, loans, advances, or indebtedness shall not be deemed the receipt by such agency of proceeds of taxes levied by or on behalf of such agency within the meaning of Article XIII B, nor shall such portion of taxes be deemed receipt of the proceeds of taxes by, or an appropriation subject to the limitation of, any other public body within the meaning or for the purpose of the Constitution and laws of the State, including Section 33678. The constitutionality of Section 33678 has been upheld in two California appellate court decisions, Brown v. Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Santa Ana and Bell Community Redevelopment Agency v. Woosley. The plaintiff in Brown v. Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Santa Ana petitioned the California Supreme Court for a hearing of this case. The California Supreme Court formally denied the petition and therefore the earlier court decisions are now final and binding. Based on these decisions, the Successor Agency has not adopted an appropriations limit. Articles XIII C and XIII D of the California Constitution June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 408 26 On November 5, 1996, the voters of the State approved Proposition 218. Proposition 218 added Articles XIII C and XIII D to the State Constitution, which contain a number of provisions affecting the ability of local entities of government to levy and collect both existing and future taxes, assessments, fees and charges. Article XIII C to the State Constitution provides that any tax assessment or charge may be repealed by the State‟s initiative process. However, since the Series 2017 Bonds are not payable from or secured by any such sources of revenue, Proposition 218 does not affect the issuance or sale of, or the security for, the Series 2017 Bonds. Tax-Sharing Payments AB 1290 Pass-Through Payments. The Redevelopment Plans for all of the Project Areas (except for the Montalvin Manor Project Area) were amended after January 1, 1994 and therefore are subject to the statutory tax-sharing payments mandated by the Law, as amended by AB 1290, requiring that a portion of the property tax revenues be shared with affected taxing entities within those Project Areas except to the extent that the Former Agency had a negotiated pass-through agreement with the affected taxing entity. The payments for those Project Areas (collectively, the “Pre-AB 1290 Project Areas”) and the Montalvin Manor Project Area that was formed after AB 1290 are calculated differently. The payments for the Pre-AB 1290 Project Areas are required because the financial and time limitations for the various Redevelopment Plans were amended after AB 1290 was enacted. Payments of the pass-through payment are only due on increases in tax increment revenues above levels received in certain years. These years are referred to as the “AB 1290 AV Base Year” and are different for the various Pre-AB 1290 Project Areas. Provisions of the Dissolution Act authorize the Successor Agency to request that an affected taxing entity subordinate its right to receive such statutory payments to the payment of loans, bonds or other indebtedness of the Successor Agency. The Successor Agency has requested that the taxing entities subordinate the AB 1290 Pass-Through Payments to the payment of debt service on the Series 2017 Bonds, and has provided substantial evidence that it will have sufficient funds available to pay debt service on the Series 2017 Bonds and make the statutory payments to the affected taxing entities. [As of the date of this Official Statement, the subordination process had not been completed.] These AB 1290 Pass-Through Payments were subordinate to the payments on the Former Agency Indebtedness. [To be updated prior to posting.] For purposes of the projections of Tax Revenues shown in the Fiscal Consultant Report and this Official Statement, the Fiscal Consultant has assumed that the AB 1290 Pass- Through Payments will be subordinate to the payment of debt service on the Series 2017 Bonds. Table 4 below shows, for each Pre-AB 1290 Project Area, the dates when AB 1290 Pass-Through Payments began, and the AB 1290 AV Base Year, which represents the date after which the Successor Agency owed pass-through payments on any tax increment increases. Table 4 AB 1290 AV Base Year Project Area AB 1290 AV Base Fiscal Year Pass Thru Began Contra Costa Centre-Original 2004-05 2005-06 Contra Costa Centre-Amendment 2008-09 2009-10 North Richmond† 2007-08 2008-09 Bay Point† 2007-08 2008-09 Rodeo 2010-11 2011-12 ____________ † The assessed value of this Project Area is below the adjusted base year value, so no AB 1290 Pass-Through Payments are required. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 409 27 For the Montalvin Manor Project Area, AB 1290 Pass-Through Payments are due based on the total tax increment generated in this area. The pass-through payments for this Project Area is based on a three tier formula, and payments are made after the deposit by the Successor Agency to its housing set- aside. Although the Successor Agency is no longer required to make a housing set-aside deposit, the Dissolution Act specifically states that the AB 1290 Pass-Through Payments are to be made as if the housing deposits were still being made. For the calculation methodology see APPENDIX B–“FISCAL CONSULTANT REPORT.” Unpaid 1290 Pass-Through Payments. The County owes AB 1290 Pass-Through Payments to those taxing entities that did not enter into negotiated pass-through arrangements with the Former Agency for the Contra Costa Centre and Rodeo Project Areas. The County Auditor-Controller will make the payments owed for Fiscal Year 2016-17 (which total approximately $755,000) from the June 2017 RPTTF allocation. The County Auditor-Controller intends to make a one-time payment of the remaining AB 1290 Pass-Through Payments owed for these two Project Areas being those from Fiscal Years 2011- 12 through 2015-16 (in the approximate amount of $2.3 million) in a one-time payment from the January 2018 RPTTF distribution. The projections on Table 12 show the payments being made prior to the payment of scheduled debt service on the Series 2017 Bonds with sufficient remaining funds for debt service coverage. Both the North Richmond and Bay Point Project Areas are below their adjusted base year value, and so no AB 1290 Pass-Through Payments were required to be made in respect of those Project Areas. Subordinate Negotiated Tax-Sharing Payments. Pursuant to Section 33401 of the Law, the Successor Agency entered into tax-sharing agreements with a number of taxing entities in the Project Areas. A brief discussion of each agreement is provided below. Contra Costa Centre Project Area: The Successor Agency has an agreement with the Contra Costa County Mosquito Abatement District (the “MAD”) and the Consolidated Fire District which call for the Successor Agency to make payments equal to 100% of each district‟s share of tax increment in the Amendment Area. The Successor Agency also has an agreement with the County Superintendent of Schools (“SOS”) which requires payments equal to 75% of the SOS‟s share of tax increment in the Amendment Area, and an agreement with the Contra Costa County Library District which requires payments from the Amendment Area equal to this district‟s share once all “approved units” have been completed. Although, the Fiscal Consultant believes that payments under this agreement have not yet been triggered, such payments have been included in the projections of property taxes in the Report of the Fiscal Consultant. Bay Point Project Area: The Successor Agency has an agreement with the Consolidated Fire District that requires the Agency to make payments equal to 100% of this district‟s share of tax increment. Rodeo Project Area: The Successor Agency has agreements with the MAD, the Rodeo- Hercules Fire District, the SOS, and the Contra Costa Community College District. The agreements each require the Successor Agency to make payments equal to 100% of each district‟s share of tax increment. The Successor Agency also has an agreement with the East Bay Regional Park District that requires that the Successor Agency make a payment from tax increment of up to $500,000 for specific facilities. Subordinate Developer Payment. The Successor Agency is required to make annual payments of $1,327,812 pursuant to an agreement with Pleasant Hill Transit Village Associates LLC. Pursuant to provisions of the agreement, the Successor Agency has requested that the developer subordinate these June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 410 28 payments to the payments of scheduled debt service on the Series 2017 Bonds, however this process has not yet been completed. These payments were subordinate to payments on the Former Agency Indebtedness. [To be updated prior to posting.] Proposition 87 On November 8, 1988 the voters of the State approved Proposition 87, which amended Article XVI, Section 16 of the California Constitution to provide that property tax revenue attributable to the imposition of taxes on property within a redevelopment project area for the purpose of paying debt service on bonded indebtedness approved by the voters of the taxing entity after January 1, 1989 will be allocated to the taxing entity and not to the redevelopment agency. Because this provision is not retroactive, the Successor Agency does not believe the provisions of Proposition 87 can have a material adverse effect on the ability of the Successor Agency to pay debt service on the Series 2017 Bonds. Property Tax Collection Procedures Valuation. The assessed valuation of property is established by the County Assessor and reported at 100% of the full cash value as of January 1, except for public utility property, which is assessed by the State Board of Equalization. City property related taxes are assessed and collected at the same time and on the same tax rolls as are County, school, and special district taxes. The valuation of property is determined as of January 1 each year and equal installments of tax levied upon secured property become delinquent on the following December 10 and April 10. Taxes on unsecured property are due May 15 and become delinquent August 31. Transferred properties and improvements are assessed at 100% of full cash value, is referred to as the base year value of the property. As discussed under “–Article XIII A of the California Constitution,” pursuant to Article XIII A of the California Constitution, annual increases in property valuations by the County Assessor are limited to a maximum 2% inflation factor unless properties are improved or sold. The base year value plus its inflation factors is referred to as the factored base of the property. Therefore, the County tax rolls do not reflect values uniformly proportional to market values. In 1978, the voters of the State passed Proposition 8, a constitutional amendment to Article XIII A that allows a temporary reduction in assessed value when real property suffers a decline in value. A decline in value occurs when the current market value of real property is less than the current factored base year value of the property as of the lien date, January 1. See “THE PROJECT AREAS–Taxable Values and Tax Increment Revenues.” Classifications. In California, property that is subject to ad valorem taxation is classified as “secured” or “unsecured.” Secured and unsecured property is entered on separate parts of the asses sment roll maintained by the county assessor. The secured classification includes property on which any property tax levied by a county becomes a lien on that property sufficient, in the opinion of the county assessor, to secure payment of the taxes. Every tax that becomes a lien on secured property has priority over all other liens arising pursuant to State law on the secured property, regardless of the time of the creation of the other liens. A tax levied on unsecured property does not become a lien against the taxed unsecured property, but may become a lien on certain other property owned by the taxpayer. Collections. The County collects the ad valorem property taxes. Taxes arising from the basic one percent levy are apportioned among local taxing agencies on the basis of a formula established by State law in 1979. Under this formula, the Successor Agency receives a base year allocation plus an allocation on the basis of growth in assessed value (consisting of new construction, change of ownership June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 411 29 and inflation). Taxes relating to voter-approved indebtedness are allocated to the relevant taxing agency. Taxes relating to voter-approved pension costs are allocated to the taxing agency. The method of collecting delinquent taxes is substantially different for the two classifications of property. The taxing authority has four ways of collecting unsecured personal property taxes in the absence of timely payment by the taxpayer: (1) a civil action against the taxpayer; (2) filing a certificate in the office of the county clerk specifying certain facts in order to obtain a judgment lien on certain property of the taxpayer; (3) filing a certificate of delinquency for record in the county recorder‟s office, in order to obtain a lien on certain property of the taxpayer; and (4) seizure and sale of personal property, improvements or possessory interests belonging or assessed to the assessee. The exclusive means of enforcing the payment of delinquent taxes with respect to property on the secured roll is the sale of the property securing the taxes to the State for the amount of taxes that are delinquent. Delinquencies. Except for property assessed by the State, the valuation of property is determined as of January l each year and equal installments of taxes levied upon secured property become delinquent after the following December 10 and April 10. Taxes on unsecured property are due January 1. Unsecured taxes enrolled by July 31, if unpaid, are delinquent August 31 at 5:00 p.m. and are subject to penalty; unsecured taxes added to roll after July 31, if unpaid, are delinquent on the last day of the month succeeding the month of enrollment. Current tax payment practices by the County provide for payment to the Successor Agency of tax revenues on a semiannual basis. Tax increment is allocated to the Successor Agency based on 100% of the calculated tax levy. Penalty. A 10% penalty is added to delinquent taxes that have been levied with respect to property on the secured roll and not paid by the due date. In addition, property on the secured roll on which taxes are delinquent are declared in default with respect to such property on or about June 30 of the fiscal year. Such property may thereafter be redeemed by payment of the delinquent taxes and a delinquency penalty, plus a redemption penalty of 1.5% per month to the time of redemption and a $15 cost. Because the County allocates property taxes to the Successor Agency based on 100% of the tax levy, the County retains all such penalties and interest. See “–County Tax Losses Reserve Fund (Teeter Plan).” County Tax Losses Reserve Fund (Teeter Plan). The County has adopted the Alternative Method of Distribution of Tax Levies and Collections and of Tax Sale Proceeds (the “Teeter Plan”), as provided for in Section 4701 et seq. of the California Revenue and Taxation Code and has created a tax loss reserve fund (the “Tax Losses Reserve Fund”). Under the Teeter Plan, each participating local agency levying property taxes in the County receives the amount of uncollected taxes credited to its fund, in the same manner as if the amount credited had been collected. In return, the County receives and retains delinquent payments, penalties and interest as collected, that would have been due the local agency. The constitutionality of the Teeter Plan was upheld in Corrie v. County of Contra Costa, 110 Cal. App. 2d 210 (1952). The County was the first Teeter Plan county in the State when the Teeter Plan was enacted by the State Legislature in 1949. The Contra Costa County Auditor Controller (the “County Auditor”) reports that, to date, the Tax Losses Reserve Fund has proved adequate to meet all tax and special assessment delinquencies, with the effect that, each year, the County has received the full amount of taxes levied and assessment installments posted to the tax bill. There can be no guarantee, however, that the County Tax Losses Reserve Fund will continue to be sufficient to meet such delinquencies in the future. The County has the power to unilaterally discontinue the Teeter Plan on a countywide basis with respect to one or more categories, June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 412 30 including general taxes, special taxes or special assessment installments. The Teeter Plan may also be discontinued by petition of two-thirds (2/3) of the participant taxing agencies. If the Teeter Plan within the Project Areas were discontinued, the amount of the levy of property tax revenue that can be allocated to the Successor Agency would depend upon the actual collections of taxes within the Project Areas. Substantial delinquencies in the payment of property taxes could then impair the timely receipt by the Successor Agency of Tax Revenues and the payment of debt service on the Series 2017 Bonds. Unitary Property Assembly Bill (“AB”) 2890 (Chapter 1457, Statutes of 1986) provides that, commencing with the 1988-89 Fiscal Year, assessed value derived from State assessed unitary property county wide is to be allocated as follows: (1) each tax rate area will receive the same amount from each assessed utility received in the previous fiscal year unless the applicable county wide values are insufficient to do so, in which case values will be allocated to each tax rate area on a pro rata basis; and (2) if values to be allocated are greater than in the previous fiscal year, each tax rate area will receive a pro rata share of the increase from each assessed utility according to a specified formula. Additionally, the lien date on State assessed property is changed from February 1 to January 1. AB 454 (Chapter 921, Statutes of 1987) further modifies Chapter 1457 regarding the distribution of tax revenues derived from property assessed by the State Board of Equalization. Chapter 921 provides for the consolidation of all State assessed unitary property, except for railroad property, into a single tax rate area in each county. Chapter 921 further provides for a new method of establishing tax rates on State assessed property and distribution of property tax revenues derived from State-assessed property to taxing jurisdictions within each county in accordance with a new formula. Railroads will continue to be assessed and revenues allocated to all tax rate areas where railroad property is sited. The intent of Chapters 1457 and 921 is to provide redevelopment agencies with their appropriate share of revenues generated from the property assessed by the State Board of Equalization and administrative procedures have been determined by the County Auditor to implement the legislation. AB 454 provided that revenues derived from Unitary Property, commencing with the 1988-89 fiscal year, will be allocated as follows: (1) for revenues generated from the one percent tax rate, (a) each jurisdiction, including project areas, will receive a percentage up to 102% of its prior year State-assessed unitary revenue; and (b) if countywide revenues generated from Unitary Property are greater than 102% of the previous year‟s unitary revenues, each jurisdiction will receive a percentage share of the excess unitary revenues by a specified formula and (2) for revenue generated from the application of the debt service tax rate to county-wide unitary taxable value, each jurisdiction will receive a percentage share of revenue based on the jurisdiction‟s annual debt service requirements and the percentage of property taxes received by each jurisdiction from unitary property taxes. This provision applies to all Unitary Property except railroads whose valuation will continue to be allocated to individual tax rate areas. The provisions of AB 454 do not constitute an elimination of the assessment of any State- assessed properties nor a revision of the method of assessing utilities by the State Board of Equalization. Generally, AB 454 allows valuation growth or decline of Unitary Property to be shared by all jurisdictions in a county. The Fiscal Consultant has estimated that the Successor Agency is qualified to receive approximately $103,239 of allocable tax revenues in Fiscal Year 2016-17 from unitary property tax revenues. To the extent unitary values decrease County wide, the Successor Agency‟s allocable tax revenues resulting from unitary assessments can be expected to decrease. Future Initiatives June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 413 31 Article XIII A, Article XIII B and certain other propositions affecting property tax levies were each adopted as measures that qualified for the ballot pursuant to the State‟s initiative process. From time to time other initiative measures could be adopted, further affecting the Tax Revenues or the ability of the Successor Agency to expend revenues. THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY General The Successor Agency was established by the Board of Supervisors following the dissolution of the Former Agency pursuant to the Dissolution Act. See “INTRODUCTION–The Former Agency, the County and the Successor Agency–The Successor Agency.” On January 17, 2012, pursuant to Resolution No. 2012/29 and Section 34173 of the Dissolution Act, the Board of Supervisors elected to serve as the governing body of the Successor Agency. Section 34173(g) of the Dissolution Act, added by AB 1484, expressly affirms that the Successor Agency is a separate legal entity from the County, that the two entities shall not merge, and that the liabilities of the Former Agency will not be transferred to the County nor will the assets of the Former Agency become assets of the County unless they are identified in the Housing Asset Transfer List approved by the Department of Finance pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34176, or public use properties as permitted under Health and Safety Code Section 34181(a) and approved by the Oversight Board and the Department of Finance. Successor Agency Powers All powers of the Successor Agency are vested in its five member Governing Board, who are the elected members of the Board of Supervisors. Pursuant to the Dissolution Act, the Successor Agency succeeds to the organizational status of the Former Agency but without any legal authority to participate in redevelopment activities, except to complete any work related to approved enforceable obligations. The Successor Agency is tasked with expeditiously winding down the affairs of the Former Agency, pursuant to the procedures and provisions of the Dissolution Act. Under the Dissolution Act, substantially all Successor Agency actions are subject to approval by the Oversight Board, as well as review by the Department of Finance. Status of Compliance with Dissolution Act The Dissolution Act requires a due diligence review be conducted to determine the unobligated balances of each successor agency that are available for transfer to taxing entities. The due diligence review involves separate reviews of the low and moderate income housing fund and of all other funds and accounts of each successor agency. Once a successor agency completes the due diligence review and any transfers to taxing entities, the Department of Finance will issue a finding of completion that expands the authority of each successor agency in carrying out the wind-down process. A finding of completion allows a successor agency to, among other things, retain real property assets of the dissolved former agency and utilize proceeds derived from bonds issued prior to January 1, 2011 in a manner consistent with the original covenants for such bonds. The Successor Agency completed the due diligence process and received its Finding of Completion on July 18, 2013. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 414 32 After receiving a finding of completion, each successor agency is required to submit a long range property management plan detailing what it intends to do with its inventory of properties. Successor agencies are not required to immediately dispose of their properties but are limited in terms of what they can do with the retained properties. Permissible uses include: sale of the property, use of the property to fill an enforceable obligation, retention of the property for future redevelopment, and retention of the property for governmental use. These plans must be filed by successor agencies within six months of receiving a finding of completion, and the Department of Finance will review these plans as submitted on a rolling basis. The Successor Agency timely submitted a Long Range Property Management Plan (an “LRPMP”) to the Department of Finance but the LRPMP was not approved prior to the statutory deadline due to a disagreement regarding costs related to one of the parcels owned by the Former Agency. The Successor Agency is proceeding with plans to transfer or liquidate all of the parcels and has identified other funding sources to do so. The Successor Agency believes that its ability to pay the scheduled debt service on the Series 2017 Bonds will not be materially adversely affected pending approval of the LRPMP by the Department of Finance. Financial Statements Prior to the enactment of the Dissolution Act, the Former Agency retained independent auditors to prepare audited financial statements for each Fiscal Year, separate and apart from the report of the audited financial statements of the County. The Dissolution Act requires that a post audit of the financial transactions and records of the Successor Agency be made at least annually by a certified public accountant. For Fiscal Year 2015-16, the financial transactions for the Successor Agency are incorporated in and made part of the Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports (the “CAFR”) of the County, which was prepared by Maze & Associates. The Fiscal Year 2015-16 CAFR of the County is attached as Appendix C. As previously stated in this Official Statement, the Successor Agency is a separate legal entity from the County, the assets and liabilities of the Successor Agency are not the assets and liabilities of the County. The Series 2017 Bonds are payable from and secured by a pledge of Tax Revenues only. See “SECURITY AND SOURCES OF PAYMENT FOR THE SERIES 2017 BONDS.” The Fiscal Year 2015-16 CAFR is attached as Appendix C because it includes the audited financial statements of the Successor Agency. THE COUNTY The County lies northeast of the San Francisco Bay and is the ninth most populous county in California. The County seat is in the City of Martinez. Major industries in the County include petroleum refining and telecommunications. For certain economic, demographic and financial information with respect to the County, see APPENDIX A–“GENERAL COUNTY ECONOMIC AND DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION” and APPENDIX C– “COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT OF THE COUNTY FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2016.” The County is not obligated to pay the principal or redemption price of, or interest on the Series 2017 Bonds. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 415 33 THE PROJECT AREAS Description The Project Areas consist of the Bay Point, Contra Costa Centre, Montalvin Manor, North Richmond, and Rodeo Redevelopment Project Areas. Descriptions of each Project Area are set forth below. For the location of each Project Area within the County see the map on page iii. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 416 34 Table 5 Summary of Project Areas 2016-17 Tax Increment Percent Project Area Acreage Location Land Use Amount of Total Bay Point 1,550 East County Single family homes and industrial/manufacturing $3,564,510 19% Contra Costa Centre 125 Central County Multifamily and commercial Class A office 9,551,722 51 Montalvin Manor 211 West County Single family homes and mobile homes 501,785 3 North Richmond 900 West County Single family homes, multifamily and industrial/manufacturing 2,492,712 13 Rodeo 650 West County Single family homes, multifamily and commercial 2,520,628 14 TOTAL 3,436 $18,631,357 100% ____________ Source: Contra Costa County. Bay Point Project Area. The Bay Point Redevelopment Project Area (formerly the West Pittsburg Redevelopment Project Area) consists of approximately 1,550 contiguous acres located in the eastern portion of the County. It is generally bounded by the City of Pittsburg on the east, State Route 4 on the south, Port Chicago Highway on the west, and Suisun Bay and the Sacramento Northern Railroad right-of-way on the north. Land uses in this Project Area consist of primarily of single family homes and industrial/manufacturing uses. Planned development includes construction of up to 340 units of new housing with 40,000 square feet of commercial space at Orbisonia Heights which is located near the Bay Point Bay Area Rapid Transit System (“BART”), a commuter train system that links key locations in the San Francisco Bay Area, BART station and development of an approximately 45 acre light industrial park. Contra Costa Centre Project Area. The Contra Costa Centre Redevelopment Project Area (formerly the Pleasant Hill BART Redevelopment Project Area) consists of approximately 125 acres located in central Contra Costa County. The Contra Costa Centre Project Area lies in an area with a high level of regional accessibility, provided by Interstate 680 and the Pleasant Hill BART Station. The focal point of this Project Area is the Contra Costa Centre Transit Village. Eight of the 10 largest taxpayers are located in this Project Area. See Table 9–“Ten Largest Property Taxpayers.” Land uses in this Project Area consist of primarily of a mix of Class A commercial office space, hotels, and multifamily housing. In 2010, the first phase of the Contra Costa Centre Transit Village was completed, including the construction of streets, infrastructure, a town square that includes approximately 35,000 square feet of retail space, 422 luxury residential units, a 1,551-space multi-level parking garage for BART that enabled the former surface parking lot to be developed. Construction of the second phase, including construction June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 417 35 of 200 luxury residential rental units and approximately 2,300 square feet of retail space is expected to commence in October 2017. The third phase consisting of an approximately 290,000 square foot office building has been approved, however no construction start date has been announced. Montalvin Manor Project Area. The Montalvin Manor Redevelopment Project Area consists of approximately 211 contiguous acres in an unincorporated area in the western portion of the County bounded on the north by the San Pablo Bay and on the south by the City of Richmond. This Project Area is located along San Pablo Avenue, near Richmond Parkway and can be accessed from Interstate 80 by the Richmond Parkway and from San Pablo Avenue. Land uses in this Project Area consist primarily of single family homes and mobile homes. No development for this Project Area is currently planned. North Richmond Project Area. The North Richmond Redevelopment Project Area consists of approximately 900 acres. Located in the western portion of the County, the North Richmond Project Area is an unincorporated contiguous area bordered on the south, east and north by the City of Richmond and on the west by the San Francisco Bay and can be accessed from the Richmond Parkway. Land uses in this Project Area consist of primarily of single family homes, multifamily housing, and commercial uses. Planned development includes construction of a 42-unit multifamily apartment building, a commercial bakery and retail outlet, and an approximately 600,000 square foot distribution center. Rodeo Project Area. The Rodeo Redevelopment Project Area consists of approximately 650 acres bounded on the west and south by the City of Hercules, on the north by San Pablo Bay and on the east by Interstate 80. This Project Area is largely residential with commercial strips located along the major corridors and can be accessed from Interstate 80 and Parker Avenue. Land uses in this Project Area consist of primarily of single family homes, multifamily housing, and industrial/manufacturing uses. Planned development includes expanding commercial uses in the waterfront area, and construction of a mixed-use project in the town center. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 418 36 Land Uses The predominate land use in the Project Areas is residential, representing approximately 58% of the total by assessed value and approximately 86% of the total parcels. Table 6 presents the breakdown of land uses within the Project Areas. Table 6 Land Uses Fiscal Year 2016-17 Taxable Value Number of Parcels Amount % of Total Secured Residential 6,005 $1,324,067,155 57.52% Commercial 191 639,821,588 27.80 Industrial 84 140,200,914 6.09 Vacant 363 70,230,205 3.05 Other† 315 34,043,902 1.48 SUBTOTAL SECURED 6,958 $2,208,363,764 95.94 Unsecured/State Assessed 0 93,391,914 4.06 TOTAL 6,958 $2,301,755,678 100.00% _______________ † Includes institutional and recreational uses. Source: Fraser & Associates. Redevelopment Plans Bay Point Project Area. The Board of Supervisors adopted the Redevelopment Plan establishing the West Pittsburg Project Area by Ordinance No. 87-102 on December 29, 1987. This Redevelopment Plan was subsequently amended in 1994 and 1999 to extend the time period of the Redevelopment Plan, increase the tax increment and bond limits and the time period to commence eminent domain proceedings, and in 2006 to remove the debt establishment time limit by one year. Contra Costa Centre Project Area. The Board of Supervisors adopted the Redevelopment Plan establishing the Pleasant Hill BART Project Area (the “Original Project Area”) by Ordinance No. 84-30 on July 10, 1984. This Redevelopment Plan was amended and restated on July 19, 1988 to conform with the amended Specific Plan adopted for this area to promote the development of high density housing, and to add territory (the “Amendment Area”) to the Original Project Area. This Redevelopment Plan was subsequently amended in 1994 and 1999 to extend the time period of the Redevelopment Plan, in 2005 to increase the tax increment and bond limits, and in 2006 to extend the limits effectiveness, receipt and collection time limits of the Redevelopment Plan by one year and remove the debt establishment time limit. Montalvin Manor Project Area. The Board of Supervisors adopted the Redevelopment Plan establishing the Montalvin Manor Project Area by Ordinance No. 2003-23 on July 8, 2003, which was subsequently amended in 2006 to extend the effectiveness, and receipt and collection time limits of the Redevelopment Plan for an additional year. North Richmond Project Area. The Board of Supervisors adopted the Redevelopment Plan establishing the North Richmond Project Area by Ordinance No. 87-50 on July 14, 1987. This Redevelopment Plan was subsequently amended in 1994 and 1999 to extend the time period of the June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 419 37 Redevelopment Plan and the time period to commence eminent domain proceedings, and in 2006 to extend the effectiveness, receipt and collection time limits of the Redevelopment Plan by one year and remove the debt establishment time limit. Rodeo Project Area. The Board of Supervisors adopted the Redevelopment Plan establishing the Rodeo Project Area by Ordinance No. 90-50 on July 10, 1990. This Redevelopment Plan was subsequently amended in 1994 and 1999 to extend the time period of the Redevelopment Plan, in 2002 to extend the time period to commence eminent domain proceedings, and in 2006 to extend the effectiveness, receipt and collection time limits for an additional year and to remove the debt establishment time limit. (Remainder of this Page Intentionally Left Blank) June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 420 Historical Taxable Values Set forth in Table 7 below are historical taxable values in the combined Project Areas since Fiscal Year 2002-03. For a discussion of some of the factors that may affect property tax revenues, see “CERTAIN RISKS TO BONDOWNERS.” For Fiscal Year 2016-17 secured values for the Project Areas increased by $71.3 million compared to the secured values for Fiscal Year 2015-16. Since Fiscal Year 2002-03, taxable values in the Project Areas have increased from $1.264 billion to $2.3 billion in Fiscal Year 2016-17. The total percentage change was 82.15% over the 14- year period, and the average annual percentage change in values was 4.38%. Table 7 Historical Assessed Values Locally- Assessed Unsecured State-Assessed Total Percentage Incremental Fiscal Year Secured Value Value Value Assessed Value Change Value† 2002-03 $1,177,117,174 $83,333,018 $3,198,446 $1,263,648,638 – $814,704,752 2003-04 1,271,771,050 80,442,733 8,320,640 1,360,534,423 7.67% 911,590,537 2004-05 1,514,718,438 71,967,707 4,613,897 1,591,300,042 16.96 1,142,356,156 2005-06 1,611,521,080 90,022,258 4,771,082 1,706,314,420 7.23 1,257,370,534 2006-07 1,857,306,712 111,089,826 4,033,130 1,972,429,668 15.60 1,523,485,782 2007-08 2,032,224,896 106,482,880 3,650,955 2,142,358,731 8.62 1,693,414,845 2008-09 2,042,182,867 102,496,344 3,650,955 2,148,330,166 0.28 1,699,386,280 2009-10 1,793,987,322 95,494,534 3,650,955 1,893,132,811 (11.88) 1,444,188,925 2010-11 1,767,767,000 87,638,104 3,308,132 1,858,713,236 (1.82) 1,409,769,350 2011-12 1,747,706,553 83,242,875 3,308,132 1,834,257,560 (1.32) 1,385,313,674 2012-13 1,705,895,231 84,278,975 3,308,132 1,793,482,338 (2.22) 1,344,538,452 2013-14 1,796,453,342 95,079,923 1,871,492 1,893,404,757 5.57 1,444,460,871 2014-15 1,930,751,719 86,194,322 1,740,610 2,018,686,651 6.62 1,569,742,765 2015-16 2,137,067,523 89,536,555 1,740,610 2,228,344,688 10.39 1,779,400,802 2016-17 2,208,363,764 93,263,304 128,610 2,301,755,678 3.29 1,852,811,792 Total Percentage Assessed Value Change ___% Average Percentage Assessed Value Change ___ ____________ † Taxable Value above base year value of $448,943,886. Source: County Auditor-Controller Office.37 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 421 39 Despite the overall increase in assessed values in the Project Areas since Fiscal year 2002-03 as shown in Table 7, secured assessed values declined between Fiscal Years 2008-09 and 2012-13 by a total of $336.3 million. The primary reason for the decline was due to temporary residential Proposition 8 reductions that were granted to property owners in the aggregate amount of approximately $205 million. See “–Appeals and Other Reductions to Assessed Value.” Residential sales during this period also reduced assessed value by $292.8 million. However, these reductions were partially offset by the completion of the Transit Village project in the Contra Costa Centre Project Area, which added $163.9 million in new value by Fiscal Year 2012-13. Starting in Fiscal Year 2013-14, and continuing through Fiscal Year 2016-17, secured values have increased by $502.5 million, largely due to reversals of the temporary Proposition 8 reductions, and increases in residential property values. For a summary of the Proposition 8 reductions, see “–Appeals and Other Reductions to Assessed Values.” Table 8 Summary of Secured Value Changes Fiscal Years Fiscal Years 2008-09 to 2012-13 2012-13 to 2016-17 Proposition 8 Adjustments $(205,122,232) $198,696,962 Residential Property Sales (292,781,612) 112,602,552 Non-Residential Changes (2,289,820) 137,862,566 New Development 163,906,028 0 Inflation Adjustment/Other 0 53,306,453 TOTAL $(336,287,636) $502,468,533 ____________ Source: County Auditor-Controller Office. (Remainder of this Page Intentionally Left Blank) June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 422 Ten Largest Property Taxpayers Table 9 sets forth assessed values for the 10 largest property taxpayers in the Project Areas for Fiscal Year 2016-17. The 10 largest property taxpayers in the Project Areas account for a Fiscal Year 2016-17 total taxable value of $822.9 million, representing approximately 36% of the total taxable value and approximately 44% of the incremental value of the Project Areas. Eight of the 10 largest taxpayers are located in Contra Costa Centre Project Area and the remaining two are located in the Bay Point Project Area. Table 9 Ten Largest Property Taxpayers Fiscal Year 2016-17 Assessee Project Area No. Parcels Land Use Secured Unsecured Total Taxable Value(1) % of Total Taxable Value % of Incremental Value(2) AvalonBay Communities (BART)(3) Contra Costa Centre 7 Residential 174,198,191 0 $174,198,191 7.57% 9.40% CSAA Inter-Insurance Bureau Contra Costa Centre 1 Office 127,706,861 9,772,045 137,478,906 5.97 7.42 MLM Treat Towers Property Contra Costa Centre 2 Office 123,267,961 0 123,267,961 5.36 6.65 Park Regency Contra Costa Centre 6 Residential 93,988,793 0 93,988,793 4.08 5.07 DWF V 2999 Oak LLC Contra Costa Centre 2 Office 79,502,122 0 79,502,122 3.45 4.29 PMI Plaza LLC Contra Costa Centre 2 Office 66,164,355 2,557,301 68,721,656 2.99 3.71 Shirley N. Wilson Trust Contra Costa Centre 1 Hotel/Fitness Club 50,181,962 0 50,181,962 2.18 2.71 Ashford Walnut Creek LP Contra Costa Centre 1 Hotel 38,669,000 2,607,505 41,276,505 1.79 2.23 LP Catalyst Holdings Bay Point 4 Industrial 32,260,147 0 32,260,147 1.40 1.74 Henkel Corporation Bay Point 6 Industrial 21,992,113 0 21,992,113 0.96 1.19 SUBTOTAL 32 $807,931,505 $14,936,851 822,868,356 35.75 44.41 Others 6,926 Various 1,478,887,322 64.25 55.59 TOTAL 6,958 $2,301,755,678 100.00% 100.00% _______________ (1) Based on ownership of locally-assessed secured and unsecured property. (2) Based on incremental value of $1,852,811,792. (3) Represents the site of transit oriented development owned by BART, which is subject to a long-term ground lease. AvalonBay Communities is responsible for payment of the property taxes. Source: Contra Costa County Assessor Records. 39 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 423 41 AvalonBay Communities (BART). These parcels are owned by BART and leased to AvalonBay Communities pursuant to a long-term ground lease that, among other things, prohibits AvalonBay Communities from filing assessment appeals. Three parcels are developed with 422 units of luxury rental housing, approximately 35,000 square feet of retail space, and 155 parking spaces. Construction of 200- units of residential housing is expected to commence in fall 2017, and an additional parcel has been approved for development of an approximately 290,000 square foot office building, however no date for the start of construction has been announced. CSAA Inter-Insurance Bureau. This parcel is developed with a six-story, approximately 242,000 square foot office building that serves as the corporate headquarters of CSAA Insurance Group MLM Treat Towers Property. These two parcels are developed with two Class A office buildings, each comprised of approximately 187,500 square feet. Park Regency. All of six parcels are developed with 842 units of three-story, residential apartments. DWF V 2999 Oak LLC. These two parcels are developed with a 10-story, approximately 206,000 square foot, Class A commercial office building. PMI Plaza LLC. These parcels are developed with the seven-story, approximately 190,700 square foot, Class A corporate headquarters of Arch Mortgage Insurance, and an approximately 1,000- space, three-story, parking structure. Shirley N. Wilson Trust. This parcel is developed with a 175-room Marriott Renaissance Hotel and Conference Centre, and an approximately 70,000 square foot ClubSport fitness club and spa. Ashford Walnut Creek LP. This parcel is developed with a 248-room, eight floor, Embassy Suites Hotel and Conference Center. LP Catalyst Holdings. This parcel is 105 acres and is the location of a manufacturer of catalysts that are used in the oil refining industry. Henkel Corporation. This parcel is developed with a 118,150 square foot facility that is used to manufacture adhesives. Appeals and Other Reductions to Assessed Values Pursuant to California law, a property owner may apply for a reduction of the property tax assessment by filing a written application, in the form prescribed by the State Board of Equalization, with the appropriate county board of equalization or assessment appeals board. Assessment appeals may have a significant impact on the taxable value of property and therefore the tax increment revenue allocable to a project area. There are two basic types of assessment appeals provided for under State law. The first type of appeal, commonly referred to as a base year assessment appeal, involves a dispute on the valuation assigned by the County assessor immediately subsequent to an instance of a change in ownership or completion of new construction. If the base year value assigned by the County assessor is reduced, the valuation of the property cannot increase in subsequent years more than 2% annually unless and until another change in ownership and/or additional new construction activity occurs. The second type of appeal, commonly referred to as a Proposition 8 appeal, can result if factors occur causing a decline in the June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 424 42 market value of the property to a level below the property‟s then current taxable value (escalated base year value). Pursuant to State law, a property owner may apply for a Proposition 8 reduction of the property tax assessment for such owner‟s property by filing a written application, in form prescribed by the State Board of Equalization, with the appropriate county board of equalization or assessment appeals board, however Proposition 8 appeals to residential properties can also be initiated by the County Assessor. See also “–Proposition 8 Appeals.” In the County, a property owner desiring to reduce the assessed value of such property in any one year must submit an application to the Contra Costa County Assessment Appeals Board (the “Appeals Board”). Applications for any tax year must be submitted by August 15 of such tax year. Following a review of the application by the County Assessor‟s Office (the “Assessor”), the Assessor may (i) reduce the assessment through a roll correction, (ii) offer the property owner the opportunity to stipulate to a reduced assessment or (iii) confirm the assessment. Any appeals where the difference between the current assessed value and the applicant‟s opinion of value is less than $1 million are handled administratively without a hearing before the Appeals Board. For appeals in this category, the Assessor‟s office staff may confirm or reduce the assessment with a roll correction. The applicant is notified of the results of the Assessor‟s action and requested to withdraw the appeal. The roll correction can either be a base year reduction where the value will not be reassessed until the property is sold or a reduction in value which can be reversed once the conditions creating the reduction (e.g. recession, property condition) have been remedied. If the applicant does not agree with the decision of the County Assessor‟s office staff, the applicant can pursue the appeal before the Appeals Board for a hearing and decision. The Appeals Board is generally required to determine the outcome of appeals within two years of the date the appeal is filed. The Appeals Board can confirm or reduce the assessment with a roll correction in the manner described above or agree to review the appeal within the two year time period. Any reduction in the assessment ultimately granted applies only to the year for which application is made and during which the written application is filed. There are four open appeals, as shown in Table 10, none of which are by the 10 largest property taxpayers in the Project Areas. In aggregate, the owners have requested reductions in value equal to $5.567 million. Due to the small number of appeals, relative to the total assessed value of the Project Areas, the Fiscal Consultant has assumed that all four appeals would be granted. The Fiscal Consultant has reduced taxable value for the impact of open appeals in Fiscal Year 20 17-18 in the calculations presented in the projections of property tax revenues in Table 12. (Remainder of this Page Intentionally Left Blank) June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 425 43 Table 10 Resolved and Open Appeals Resolved Appeals Fiscal Year 2016-17 Value Value Assessee Roll Value Opinion Impact Pacific Wag Bay Point $9,486,639 $5,519,529 $3,967,110 Open Appeals Fiscal Year Applicants Potential 2016-17 Value Value Assessee Roll Value Opinion Impact Church of the Open Bible $593,479 $375,451 $218,028 Tower Energy 6,626,521 4,058,706 2,567,815 Rodeo Parker 788,606 116,981 671,625 Signode Industrial Group 3,809,641 1,700,000 2,109,641 TOTAL $11,818,247 $6,251,138 $5,567,109 Source: Fraser & Associates. Proposition 8 Appeals. The County processed temporary assessed value reductions for single family homes and condominiums (Proposition 8 reductions) that transferred ownership between 2008 and December 31, 2010 where the assessed values exceeded the then current market value of properties without prompting from individual taxpayers. Since 2012, property values have been increasing resulting in the reversal of a number of the “automatic” reductions. The Fiscal Consultant reviewed information on all residential parcel value changes between Fiscal Year 2008-09 and Fiscal Year 2016-17 to determine the number of parcels that declined in value within the Project Areas and the number that have had reversals. For Fiscal Year 2008-09 to 2012-13 tax roll, the value of 2,154 residential parcels (inclusive of both single and multifamily parcels) were adjusted with an aggregate value reduction of $205,122,232. Commencing with Fiscal Year 2012-13, the County reversed [the majority] of the Proposition 8 reduction increasing the assessed value by approximately $198.7 million through Fiscal Year 2016-17. In terms of future Proposition 8 reductions, recent sales data indicates that property is selling for more than the value recorded on the current tax roll. Because Proposition 8 value reductions are temporary for property that has not changed hands, once the market value of property goes back up, the value for those parcels under Proposition 8 status can increase up to their Proposition 13 base, including the compounded Proposition 13 inflation annual adjustment at the rate of 2%. Given that sales prices are exceeding tax roll values by a substantial margin and the County has reversed [the majority] of the Proposition 8 reductions, the Fiscal Consultant has assumed that there would be no further Proposition 8 reductions in Fiscal Year 2017-18 or future Fiscal Years for purposes of the tax increment projections. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 426 44 For additional information regarding assessment appeals, see APPENDIX B–“FISCAL CONSULTANT REPORT–Section E–Assessment Appeals.” Historical Property Tax Revenues Set forth in Table 11 is a summary of historical tax increment receipts since Fiscal Year 2011-12. Table 11 Historical Tax Increment Receipts Tax Increment Total Fiscal Levy per Receipts Less % of Levy Tax Increment % of Levy Year County(1) Supplementals Received Supplementals Receipts(2) Received 2011-12 $12,671,673 $12,674,594 100.02% $209,578 $12,884,172 101.68% 2012-13 12,041,629 12,045,375 100.03 575,876 12,621,251 104.81 2013-14 13,025,045 13,029,467 100.03 71,881 13,101,348 100.59 2014-15 14,212,924 14,220,313 100.05 15,256 14,235,569 100.16 2015-16 16,231,922 16,237,893 100.04 159,136 16,397,029 101.02 Average Percentage to Levy 100.04% 101.55% ______________________ (1) Initial levy reported by Contra Costa County. (2) Receipts per Agency records after reduction for property tax administrative fees and Section 33676 allocations. Source: Fraser & Associates. Projected Property Tax Revenues and Debt Service Coverage Table 12 sets forth projections of Tax Revenues for the Project Areas and Table 13 sets forth the projected debt service coverage based on such projected Tax Revenues and payments on the Series 2017 Bonds. In Table 12, the category “Real Property” consists of locally reported secured and unsecured land and improvement values and the category “Other” includes personal property and State assessed values. On December 13, 2016 the State Board of Equalization issued a letter showing that the annual inflation adjustment for Fiscal Year 2017-18 would be 2%. The projections in Table 12 and Table 13 incorporate the following assumptions: no new development; 2% annual growth beginning in Fiscal Year 2017-18 (which is the maximum inflation factor that county assessors can use to increase real property values); transfers of ownership based on data for property that sold in 2016; and reduced values for open and resolved appeals in Fiscal Year 2017-18. See APPENDIX B–“FISCAL CONSULTANT REPORT.” There can be no assurance that actual Tax Revenues will be equal to the amounts projected. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 427 Table 12 Projection of Tax Revenues 2% Growth Senior Obligations Ownership Incremental Property Changes/ Value Total Tax Fiscal Real New Other Total Over Base Tax Unitary Tax 33676 Admin Housing Tax Year Property(1) Development(2) Property(3) Value of $448,944 Increment(4) Revenue(5) Increment Adjustment(6) Fees(7) Obligations(8) Revenues 2016-17 $2,244,872 NA $56,883 $2,301,756 $1,852,812 $18,528 $103 $18,631 $1,584 $145 $650 $16,252 2017-18 2,280,045 35,923 56,883 2,372,851 1,923,907 19,239 103 19,342 1,664 151 100 17,428 2018-19 2,362,287 0 56,883 2,419,170 1,970,226 19,702 103 19,806 1,745 154 100 17,806 2019-20 2,409,533 0 56,883 2,466,416 2,017,472 20,175 103 20,278 1,828 158 100 18,192 2020-21 2,457,723 0 56,883 2,514,607 2,065,663 20,657 103 20,760 1,913 162 100 18,585 2021-22 2,506,878 0 56,883 2,563,761 2,114,817 21,148 103 21,251 2,000 166 100 18,986 2022-23 2,557,015 0 56,883 2,613,899 2,164,955 21,650 103 21,753 2,088 170 100 19,396 2023-24 2,608,156 0 56,883 2,665,039 2,216,095 22,161 103 22,264 2,178 173 100 19,813 2024-25 2,660,319 0 56,883 2,717,202 2,268,258 22,683 103 22,786 2,269 178 100 20,239 2025-26 2,713,525 0 56,883 2,770,409 2,321,465 23,215 103 23,318 2,363 182 100 20,673 2026-27 2,767,796 0 56,883 2,824,679 2,375,735 23,757 103 23,861 2,458 186 100 21,116 2027-28 2,823,152 0 56,883 2,880,035 2,431,091 24,311 103 24,414 2,556 190 100 21,568 2028-29 2,879,615 0 56,883 2,936,498 2,487,554 24,876 103 24,979 2,655 195 0 22,129 2029-30 2,937,207 0 56,883 2,994,090 2,545,146 25,451 103 25,555 2,756 199 0 22,599 2030-31 2,995,951 0 56,883 3,052,834 2,603,891 26,039 103 26,142 2,860 204 0 23,079 2031-32 3,055,870 0 56,883 3,112,753 2,663,810 26,638 103 26,741 2,965 208 0 23,568 2032-33 3,116,988 0 56,883 3,173,871 2,724,927 27,249 103 27,353 3,073 213 0 24,067 2033-34 3,179,327 0 56,883 3,236,211 2,787,267 27,873 103 27,976 3,182 218 0 24,576 2034-35 3,242,914 0 56,883 3,299,797 2,850,853 28,509 103 28,612 3,294 223 0 25,095 2035-36 3,307,772 0 56,883 3,364,655 2,915,712 29,157 103 29,260 3,408 228 0 25,624 2036-37 3,373,928 0 56,883 3,430,811 2,981,867 29,819 103 29,922 3,525 233 0 26,164 _______________ (1) Prior Year Real Property increased by 2% per year. The value in 2017-18 reduced for resolved appeals. (2) No new development included in the projections or changes of ownership. (3) Includes the value of secured and unsecured personal property, and state-assessed railroad and non-unitary property. (4) Based on the application of 1% tax rate to incremental taxable value. (5) As reported by the County Auditor-Controller. (6) Per SB 2557, reflects Project Area share of Contra Costa County‟s property tax administrative costs. (7) Required payments per Section 33607.7 of the Law. (8) Housing set-aside no longer required under AB 26 and AB 1484. The amounts shown are payments due under the Reimbursement Agreement that requires annual payments to Coggins Square Associates, a California Limited Partnership in the amount of $100,000 through Fiscal Year 2028-29. Source: Fraser & Associates.44 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 428 46 Table 13 Projected Debt Service Coverage (Assuming 2% Growth) Series 2017 Debt Fiscal Year 2017-18 Fiscal Tax Bonds Service Debt Service Year Revenues Debt Service Coverage Coverage 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 2031-32 2032-33 2033-34 2034-35 2035-36 2036-37 ____________________ Sources: Contra Costa County and Fraser & Associates for tax increment and Stifel for debt service. CERTAIN RISKS TO BONDOWNERS The following factors, along with the other information in this Official Statement, should be considered by potential investors in evaluating a purchase of the Series 2017 Bonds. However, they do not constitute an exhaustive listing of risks and other considerations which may be relevant to an investment in the Series 2017 Bonds. In addition, the order in which the following information is presented is not intended to reflect the relative importance of any such risks. Recognized Obligation Payment Schedules The Dissolution Act provides that only those payments listed in a ROPS may be made by a successor agency from the funds specified in such ROPS. If a Last and Final ROPS is not filed, Tax Revenues will not be withdrawn from the Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund by the County Auditor-Controller and remitted to the Successor Agency without a duly approved and effective ROPS to pay debt service on the bonds and to pay other enforceable obligations for each applicable annual period. In the event the Successor Agency were to fail to file a ROPS as required, the availability of Tax Revenues to the Successor Agency could be adversely affected for such period. See “PROPERTY TAX REVENUE FINANCING UNDER THE DISSOLUTION ACT–Recognized Obligation Payment Schedules.” June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 429 47 Challenges to Dissolution Act Several successor agencies, cities and other entities have filed judicial actions challenging the legality of various provisions of the Dissolution Act. One such challenge was an action filed on August 1, 2012, by Syncora Guarantee Inc. and Syncora Capital Assurance Inc. (collectively, “Syncora”) against the State, the State Controller, the State Director of Finance, and the Auditor-Controller of San Bernardino County on his own behalf and as the representative of all other County Auditors in the State (Superior Court of the State of California, County of Sacramento, Case No. 34-2012-80001215). Syncora are monoline financial guaranty insurers domiciled in the State of New York, and as such, provide credit enhancement on bonds issued by state and local governments and do not sell other kinds of insurance such as life, health, or property insurance. Syncora provided bond insurance and other related insurance policies for bonds issued by former California redevelopment agencies. The complaint alleged that the Dissolution Act, and specifically the “Redistribution Provisions” thereof (i.e., California Health and Safety Code sections 34172(d), 34174, 34177(d), 34183(a)(4), and 34188) violate the “contract clauses” of the United States and California Constitutions (U.S. Const. art. 1, §10, cl.1; Cal. Const. art. 1, §9) because they unconstitutionally impair the contracts among the former redevelopment agencies, bondholders and Syncora. The complaint also alleged that the Redistribution Provisions violate the “Takings Clauses” of the United States and California Constitutions (U.S. Const. amend. V; Cal Const. art. 1 § 19) because they unconstitutionally take and appropriate bondholders‟ and Syncora‟s contractual right to critical security mechanisms without just compensation. After hearing by the Sacramento County Superior Court on May 3, 2013, the Superior Court ruled that Syncora‟s constitutional claims based on contractual impairment were premature. The Superior Court also held that Syncora‟s takings claims, to the extent based on the same arguments, were also premature. Pursuant to a Judgment stipulated to by the parties, the Superior Court on October 3, 2013, entered its order dismissing the action. The Judgment, however, provides that Syncora preserves its rights to reassert its challenges to the Dissolution Act in the future. The Successor Agency does not guarantee that any reassertion of challenges by Syncora or that the final results of any of the judicial actions brought by others challenging the Dissolution Act will not result in an outcome that may have a material adverse effect on the Successor Agency‟s ability to timely pay debt service on the Series 2017 Bonds. Concentration of Tax Base Approximately 36% of the assessed value in the Project Areas is attributable to 10 taxpayers, eight of which are located in the Contra Costa Centre Project Area. The occurrence of a localized catastrophic event within the Contra Costa Centre Project Area could result in a reduction in assessed value and have a detrimental impact on the amount of the Tax Revenues allocable to the Project Areas available to pay debt service on the Series 2017 Bonds. See Table 9–“Ten Largest Property Taxpayers” and “PROJECTED DEBT SERVICE COVERAGE.” See also “LIMITATIONS ON TAX REVENUES AND POSSIBLE SPENDING LIMITATIONS–Property Tax Collection Procedures–County Tax Losses Reserve Fund (Teeter Plan).” Reduction in Taxable Value Tax Revenues allocated to the Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund are determined by the amount of incremental taxable value in the Project Areas and the current rate or rates at which property in each Constituent Project Area is taxed. The reduction of taxable values of property in the Project Areas caused by economic factors beyond the control of the Successor Agency, such as relocation out of the Project Areas by one or more major property owners, sale of property to a non-profit corporation exempt from property taxation, or the complete or partial destruction of such property caused by, among other June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 430 48 eventualities, earthquake or other natural disaster, could cause a reduction in the Tax Revenues that provide for the repayment of and secure the Series 2017 Bonds. Such reduction of Tax Revenues could have an adverse effect on the ability of the Successor Agency to make timely payments of principal of and interest on the Series 2017 Bonds. As described in greater detail under “LIMITATIONS ON TAX REVENUES AND POSSIBLE SPENDING LIMITATIONS–Article XIII A of the California Constitution,” Article XIII A provides that the full cas h value base of real property used in determining taxable value may be adjusted from year to year to reflect the inflation rate, not to exceed a two percent increase for any given year, or may be reduced to reflect a reduction in the consumer price index, comparable local data or any reduction in the event of declining property value caused by damage, destruction or other factors (as described above). Such measure is computed on a calendar year basis. Any resulting reduction in the full cash value base over the term of the Series 2017 Bonds could reduce Tax Revenues securing the Series 2017 Bonds. In addition to the other limitations on, and required application under the Dissolution Act of Tax Revenues on deposit in the Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund, described herein under the heading “CERTAIN RISKS TO BONDOWNERS,” the State electorate or Legislature could adopt a constitutional or legislative property tax reduction with the effect of reducing Tax Revenues allocated to the Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund and available to the Successor Agency. Although the federal and State Constitutions include clauses generally prohibiting the Legislature‟s impairment of contracts, there are also recognized exceptions to these prohibitions. There is no assurance that the State electorate or Legislature will not at some future time approve additional limitations that could reduce the Tax Revenues and adversely affect the source of repayment and security of the Series 2017 Bonds. Appeals to Assessed Values A successful appeal of assessed values by a taxpayer in the Project Areas in the future (excluding the major taxpayer in the Contra Costa Centre Project Area who is precluded from filing assessment appeals pursuant to the terms of its long-term ground lease of the property, see “THE PROJECT AREAS– Ten Largest Taxpayers–AvalonBay Communities (BART)) may result in a reduction to the original taxable value and a refund to the taxpayer. A reduction in taxable values within the Project Areas and the refund of property tax could affect the amount of Tax Revenues available to pay scheduled debt service on the Series 2017 Bonds. See also “THE PROJECT AREAS–Appeals and Other Reductions to Assessed Values.” See “LIMITATIONS ON TAX REVENUES AND POSSIBLE SPENDING LIMITATIONS–Property Tax Collection Procedures.” Estimates of Property Tax Revenues In estimating that the total property tax revenues to be received by the Successor Agency will be sufficient to pay debt service on the Series 2017 Bonds, the Successor Agency and the Fiscal Consultant relied on actual historical tax increment and made certain assumptions with regard to future assessed valuations in the Project Areas, future tax rates and the percentage of taxes collected and the outcome of assessment appeals. See “THE PROJECT AREAS–Taxable Values and Property Tax Revenues,” Table 9– “Ten Largest Property Taxpayers” and APPENDIX B–“FISCAL CONSULTANT REPORT.” The Successor Agency and the Fiscal Consultant believe these assumptions are reasonable, but there is no assurance that these assumptions will be realized and to the extent that the assessed valuation and the tax rates are less than expected, the total amount of property tax revenues available to pay debt service on the Series 2017 Bonds will be less than those projected in the Fiscal Consultant Report and as presented in this Official Statement. Such reduced property tax revenues may be insufficient to provide for the payment of debt service on the Series 2017 Bonds. See “SECURITY AND SOURCES OF PAYMENT FOR THE SERIES 2017 BONDS.” June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 431 49 Bankruptcy and Foreclosure The enforceability of the rights and remedies of the owners of the Series 2017 Bonds and the obligations of the Successor Agency may become subject to the following: the federal bankruptcy code and applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium, or similar laws relating to or affecting the enforcement of creditors‟ rights generally, now or hereafter in effect; usual equitable principles which may limit the specific enforcement under state law of certain remedies; the exercise by the United States of America of the powers delegated to it by the federal Constitution; and the reasonable and necessary exercise, in certain exceptional situations of the police power inherent in the sovereignty of the State of California and its governmental bodies in the interest of serving a significant and legitimate public purpose. Bankruptcy proceedings, or the exercise of powers by the federal or state government, if initiated, could subject the owners of the Series 2017 Bonds to judicial discretion and interpretation of their rights in bankruptcy or otherwise and consequently may entail risks of delay, limitation, or modification of their rights. Although bankruptcy proceedings would not cause ad valorem property taxes to become extinguished, bankruptcy of a property owner in the Project Areas could result in a delay in prosecuting superior court foreclosure proceedings of delinquent property and, in the absence of the Teeter Plan, could result in a delay in the receipt by the Successor Agency of tax revenues. Such a delay, in the absence of the Teeter Plan, would increase the possibility of a delay or default in payment of the principal of and interest on the Series 2017 Bonds. Investment Risk All funds held under the Indenture are required to be invested in Permitted Investments as provided therein. See APPENDIX D–“SUMMARY OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE INDENTURE– DEFINITIONS.” The Redevelopment Obligation Retirement Fund, into which all Tax Revenues are initially deposited, may be invested by the Successor Agency in Permitted Investments. All investments, including the Permitted Investments and those authorized by law from time to time for investments by municipalities, contain a certain degree of risk. Such risks include, but are not limited to, a lower rate of return than expected and loss or delayed receipt of principal. The occurrence of these events with respect to amounts held under the Indenture in the Redevelopment Obligation Retirement Fund could have a material adverse affect on the security for the Series 2017 Bonds. General Economic Risks The ability of the Successor Agency to make payments on the Series 2017 Bonds will be dependent upon the economic strength of the Project Areas. If there is a decline in the general economy of the area, the owners of property within the Project Areas may be less able or less willing to make timely payments of property taxes causing a delay or cessation in receipt of tax revenues by the Successor Agency. In addition, the insolvency or bankruptcy of one or more large owners of property within the Project Areas could delay or impair the receipt of Tax Revenues. Further, real estate development within the Project Areas could be adversely affected by limitations of infrastructure or future governmental policies, including governmental policies to restrict or contr ol development. See also “PROJECTED DEBT SERVICE COVERAGE.” Seismic Activity There are several earthquake faults in the greater San Francisco Bay Area that could result in damage to buildings, roads, bridges, and property within the County in the event of an earthquake. Past experiences, including the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake, measuring 6.9 on the moment magnitude scale June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 432 50 (7.1 on the Richter scale) with an epicenter approximately 60 miles south of the County and the 2014 Napa earthquake, measuring 6.0 on the moment magnitude scale with an epicenter approximately 33 miles northwest of the County, resulted in some structural damage to the infrastructure and property in the County, the repair of which was covered by insurance. However, there was no significant damage within the Project Areas. Earthquake faults that could affect the County include but may not be limited to the Hayward Fault in the western part of the County, and the Concord/Green Valley, Diablo and Calaveras Faults within the eastern portions of the County. A substantial reduction in the property values within the Project Areas could affect the willingness or ability of property owners to pay their property taxes and therefore the ability of the Successor Agency to pay debt service on the Series 2017 Bonds. Climate Change In March 2009, the California Climate Change Center released a draft paper, for informational purposes only, which was funded by the California Energy Commission, the California Environmental Protection Agency, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission, the California Department of Transportation and the California Ocean Protection Council. The title of the paper is “The Impacts of Sea-Level Rise on the California Coast.” The paper posits that increases in sea level will be a significant consequence of climate change over the next century. Climate change models predict more intense rainfall events, more frequent or extensive runoff, and more frequent and severe flood events. Localized flood events may increase in periods of heavy rain. Although climate change is likely to lead to a drier climate overall, risks from regular, more intense rainfall events can generate more frequent and/or more severe flooding that upsets California‟s managed balance between storage and protection. Additionally, erosion may increase and water quality may decrease as a result of increased rainfall amounts. The Pacific Institute identified several portions of shoreline areas within the County which may be affected by sea level rise. Local impacts of climate change are not definitive, but the County and portions of the Bay Point, North Richmond, and Rodeo Project Areas could experience changes to local and regional weather patterns; rising bay water levels; increased risk of flooding; changes in salinity and tidal patterns of San Francisco and San Pablo bays; coastal erosion; water restrictions; and vegetation changes. Sea level rise occurs as a result of rising average ocean temperatures, thermal expansion, and melting of snow and ice. While many different climate change effects will impact the County, sea level rise has been extensively researched and quantified, allowing for a clearer geographic understanding of its effects. Sea level rise of two meters or more may impact North Richmond, Rodeo and Bay Point Project Areas. The rate and amount of seal level rise will be influenced by rising average temperatures and the speed of melting glacial ice. There is a degree of uncertainty in many projections, and the present rate of sea level rise is faster than many previous projects have estimated. On average, it is projected that the County will experience a 40% increase in acreage vulnerable to a 100-year flood event between 2000 and 2100. The County Public Works Department awarded a construction contract to raise and repair levees and flood walls along San Pablo and Wildcat Creeks in the North Richmond area, work is expected to begin in September and be completed in November 2017. Climate change concerns are leading to new laws and regulations at the federal, State and local levels. The Successor Agency is unable to predict the impact such laws and regulations, if adopted, will have on development within the Project Areas. The effects, however, could be material. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 433 51 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 434 52 Hazardous Substances Owners and operators of real property may be required by law to remedy conditions of the property relating to releases or threatened releases of hazardous substances. The federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, sometimes referred to as “CERCLA” or the “Superfund Act,” is the most well-known and widely applicable of these laws, but California laws with regard to hazardous substances are also stringent and similar. Under many of these laws, the owner (or operator) is obligated to remedy a hazardous substance whether or not the owner (or operator) has or had anything to do with creating or handling the hazardous substance. Further, such liabilities may arise not simply from the existence of a hazardous substance but from the method of handling such hazardous substance. All of these possibilities could significantly and adversely affect the marketability and value of property within the Project Areas, result in a reduction of Tax Revenues, and adversely affect the ability of the Successor Agency to pay debt service on the Series 2017 Bonds. [The Successor Agency owns certain real property designated as public trails which require some environmental remediation work. The County has funded environmental studies on these properties and has agreed to acquire the properties, in their current state, as public use properties. However, the Successor Agency believes that to the extent it is required to pay for any environmental remediation work, any such payments will not materially adversely affect the Successor Agency‟s ability to pay debt service on the 2017 Bonds.] Levy and Collection of Taxes The Successor Agency has no independent power to levy and collect property taxes. Any reduction in the tax rate or the implementation of any constitutional or legislative property tax decrease could reduce the tax revenues, and accordingly, could have an adverse impact on the ability of the Successor Agency to pay debt service on the Series 2017 Bonds. In addition, the impact of bankruptcy proceedings on the legal ability of taxing agencies to collect property taxes could have an adverse effect on the Successor Agency‟s ability to make debt service payments on the Series 2017 Bonds. Likewise, delinquencies in the payment of property taxes by the owners of land in Project Areas, and the impact of bankruptcy proceedings on the ability of taxing agencies to collect property taxes, could have an adverse effect on the ability of the Successor Agency to make timely payments on the Series 2017 Bonds. Any reduction in Tax Revenues, whether for any of these reasons or any other reasons, could have an adverse effect on the ability of the Successor Agency to pay the principal of and interest on the Series 2017 Bonds. Reductions in Inflationary Rate Article XIII A of the California Constitution provides that the full cash value base of real property used in determining taxable value may be adjusted from year to year to reflect the inflationary rate, not to exceed a 2% increase for any given year, or may be reduced to reflect a reduction in the consumer price index or comparable local data. Such measure is computed on a calendar year basis. For Fiscal Year 2017-18, the Fiscal Consultant assumed constant property values and used two scenarios, 0% growth and a 2% inflation factor to increase real property values in the Project Areas. A 2% factor is the maximum inflation factor that county assessors can use to increase real property values. However, in certain Fiscal Years, including Fiscal Years 2010-11 and 2011-12, the inflation factor has been less than 2%. See “LIMITATIONS ON TAX REVENUES AND POSSIBLE SPENDING LIMITATIONS.” June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 435 53 Changes in the Law In addition to the other limitations on tax revenues described herein under “LIMITATIONS ON TAX REVENUES AND POSSIBLE SPENDING LIMITATIONS” the California electorate or Legislature could adopt a constitutional or legislative change that decreases property taxes or the amount thereof allocable to the Successor Agency with the effect of reducing tax revenues payable to the Successor Agency. There is no assurance that the California electorate or Legislature will not at some future time approve additional limitations that could reduce such tax revenues and adversely affect the security for the Series 2017 Bonds. Loss of Tax-Exemption As discussed under the caption “TAX MATTERS,” interest on the Series 2017A Bonds could become includable in gross income for purposes of federal income taxation retroactive to the date the Series 2017A Bonds were issued, as a result of future acts or omissions of the Successor Agency in violation of its covenants in the Indenture. In addition, current and future legislative proposals, if enacted into law, may cause interest on the Series 2017A Bonds to be subject, directly or indirectly, to federal income taxation by, for example, changing the current exclusion or deduction rules to limit the aggregate amount of interest on state and local government bonds that may be treated as tax exempt by individuals. Should such an event of taxability occur, the Series 2017A Bonds are not subject to special redemption and will remain outstanding until maturity or until redeemed under other provisions set forth in the Indenture. Secondary Market There can be no guarantee that there will be a secondary market for the Series 2017 Bonds, or, if a secondary market exists, that the Series 2017 Bonds can be sold for any particular price. Occasionally, because of general market conditions or because of adverse history or economic prospects connected with a particular issue, secondary marketing practices in connection with a particular issue are suspended or terminated. Additionally, prices of issues for which a market is being made will depend upon then prevailing circumstances. LEGAL MATTERS The validity of the Series 2017 Bonds and certain other legal matters are subject to the approving legal opinion of Quint & Thimmig LLP, Larkspur, California, Bond Counsel to the Successor Agency. Copies of the proposed forms of the Bond Counsel opinions are contained in APPENDIX F to this Official Statement, and the final opinions will be made available to the owners of the Series 2017 Bonds at the time of delivery of the Series 2017 Bonds. Bond Counsel undertakes no responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or fairness of this Official Statement. Certain other legal matters will be passed upon for the Successor Agency by Goldfarb & Lipman LLP, Oakland, California, Special Counsel to the Successor Agency and by Schiff Hardin LLP, San Francisco, California, Disclosure Counsel to the Successor Agency, and for the Underwriter by Jones Hall, A Professional Law Corporation, San Francisco California. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 436 54 The fees of Bond Counsel, Disclosure Counsel and Underwriter‟s Counsel are contingent upon the issuance of the Series 2017 Bonds. TAX MATTERS Series 2017A Bonds Federal tax law contains a number of requirements and restrictions which apply to the Series 2017A Bonds, including investment restrictions, periodic payments of arbitrage profits to the United States, requirements regarding the proper use of bond proceeds and the facilities financed therewith, and certain other matters. The Successor Agency has covenanted to comply with all requirements that must be satisfied in order for the interest on the Series 2017A Bonds to be excludable from gross income for federal income tax purposes. Failure to comply with certain of such covenants could cause interest on the Series 2017A Bonds to become includable in gross income for federal income tax purposes retroactively to the date of issuance of the Series 2017A Bonds. Subject to the Successor Agency‟s compliance with the above-referenced covenants, under existing law, in the opinion of Quint & Thimmig LLP, Bond Counsel, interest on the Series 2017A Bonds is excludable from the gross income of the owners thereof for federal income tax purposes and is not included as an item of tax preference in computing the federal alternative minimum tax for individuals and corporations under Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), but such interest is taken into account in computing an adjustment used in determining the federal alternative minimum tax for certain corporations. In rendering its opinion, Bond Counsel will rely upon certifications of the Successor Agency with respect to certain material facts. Bond Counsel‟s opinion represents its legal judgment based upon its review of the law and the facts that it deems relevant to render such opinion and is not a guarantee of a result. The Code includes provisions for an alternative minimum tax (“AMT”) for corporations in addition to the corporate regular tax in certain cases. The AMT, if any, depends upon the corporation‟s alternative minimum taxable income (“AMTI”), which is the corporation‟s taxable income with certain adjustments. One of the adjustment items used in computing the AMTI of a corporation (with certain exceptions) is an amount equal to 75% of the excess of such corporation‟s “adjusted current earnings” over an amount equal to its AMTI (before such adjustment item and the alternative tax net operating loss deduction). “Adjusted current earnings” would include certain tax-exempt interest, including interest on the Series 2017A Bonds. Ownership of the Series 2017A Bonds may result in collateral federal income tax consequences to certain taxpayers, including, without limitation, corporations subject to the branch profits tax, financial institutions, certain insurance companies, certain S corporations, individual recipients of Social Security or Railroad Retirement benefits and taxpayers who may be deemed to have incurred (or continued) indebtedness to purchase or carry tax-exempt obligations. Prospective purchasers of the Series 2017A Bonds should consult their tax advisors as to applicability of any such collateral consequences. The issue price (the “Issue Price”) for each maturity of the Series 2017A Bonds is the price at which a substantial amount of such maturity of the Series 2017A Bonds is first sold to the public. The Issue Price of a maturity of the Series 2017A Bonds may be different from the price set forth, or the price corresponding to the yield set forth, on the inside cover page hereof. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 437 55 If the Issue Price of a maturity of the Series 2017A Bonds is less than the principal amount payable at maturity, the difference between the Issue Price of each such maturity, if any, of the Series 2017A Bonds (the “OID Bonds”) and the principal amount payable at maturity is original issue discount. For an investor who purchases an OID Bond in the initial public offering at the Issue Price for such maturity and who holds such OID Bond to its stated maturity, subject to the condition that the Successor Agency comply with the covenants discussed above, (a) the full amount of original issue discount with respect to such OID Bond constitutes interest which is excludable from the gross income of the owner thereof for federal income tax purposes; (b) such owner will not realize taxable capital gain or market discount upon payment of such OID Bond at its stated maturity; (c) such original issue discount is not included as an item of tax preference in computing the alternative minimum tax for individuals and corporations under the Code, but is taken into account in computing an adjustment used in determining the alternative minimum tax for certain corporations under the Code, as described above; and (d) the accretion of original issue discount in each year may result in an alternative minimum tax liability for corporations or certain other collateral federal income tax consequences in each year even though a corresponding cash payment may not be received until a later year. Owners of OID Bonds should consult their own tax advisors with respect to the state and local tax consequences of original issue discount on such OID Bonds. Owners of Series 2017A Bonds who dispose of Series 2017A Bonds prior to the stated maturity (whether by sale, redemption or otherwise), purchase Series 2017A Bonds in the initial public offering, but at a price different from the Issue Price or purchase Series 2017A Bonds subsequent to the initial public offering should consult their own tax advisors. If a Series 2017A Bond is purchased at any time for a price that is less than the Series 2017A Bond‟s stated redemption price at maturity or, in the case of an OID Bond, its Issue Price plus accreted original issue discount reduced by payments of interest included in the computation of original issue discount and previously paid (the “Revised Issue Price”), the purchaser will be treated as having purchased a Series 2017A Bond with market discount subject to the market discount rules of the Code (unless a statutory de minimis rule applies). Accrued market discount is treated as taxable ordinary income and is recognized when a Series 2017A Bond is disposed of (to the extent such accrued discount does not exceed gain realized) or, at the purchaser‟s election, as it accrues. Such treatment would apply to any purchaser who purchases an OID Bond for a price that is less than its Revised Issue Price even if the purchase price exceeds par. The applicability of the market discount rules may adversely affect the liquidity or secondary market price of such Series 2017A Bond. Purchasers should consult their own tax advisors regarding the potential implications of market discount with respect to the Series 2017A Bonds. An investor may purchase a Series 2017A Bond at a price in excess of its stated principal amount. Such excess is characterized for federal income tax purposes as “bond premium” and must be amortized by an investor on a constant yield basis over the remaining term of the Series 2017A Bond in a manner that takes into account potential call dates and call prices. An investor cannot deduct amortized bond premium relating to a tax-exempt bond. The amortized bond premium is treated as a reduction in the tax- exempt interest received. As bond premium is amortized, it reduces the investor‟s basis in the Series 2017A Bond. Investors who purchase a Series 2017A Bond at a premium should consult their own tax advisors regarding the amortization of bond premium and its effect on the Series 2017A Bond‟s basis for purposes of computing gain or loss in connection with the sale, exchange, redemption or early retirement of the Series 2017A Bond. There are or may be pending in the Congress of the United States legislative proposals, including some that carry retroactive effective dates, that, if enacted, could alter or amend the federal tax matters referred to above or affect the market value of the Series 2017A Bonds. It cannot be predicted whether or June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 438 56 in what form any such proposal might be enacted or whether, if enacted, it would apply to bonds issued prior to enactment. Prospective purchasers of the Series 2017A Bonds should consult their own tax advisors regarding any pending or proposed federal tax legislation. Bond Counsel expresses no opinion regarding any pending or proposed federal tax legislation. The Internal Revenue Service (the “Service”) has an ongoing program of auditing tax exempt obligations to determine whether, in the view of the Service, interest on such tax exempt obligations is includable in the gross income of the owners thereof for federal income tax purposes. It cannot be predicted whether or not the Service will commence an audit of the Series 2017A Bonds. If an audit is commenced, under current procedures the Service may treat the Successor Agency as a taxpayer and the Series 2017A Bondholders may have no right to participate in such procedure. The commencement of an audit could adversely affect the market value and liquidity of the Series 2017A Bonds until the audit is concluded, regardless of the ultimate outcome. Payments of interest on, and proceeds of the sale, redemption or maturity of, tax exempt obligations, including the Series 2017A Bonds, are in certain cases required to be reported to the Service. Additionally, backup withholding may apply to any such payments to any Series 2017A Bond owner who fails to provide an accurate Form W 9 Request for Taxpayer Identification Number and Certification, or a substantially identical form, or to any Series 2017A Bond owner who is notified by the Service of a failure to report any interest or dividends required to be shown on federal income tax returns. The reporting and backup withholding requirements do not affect the excludability of such interest from gross income for federal tax purposes. In the further opinion of Bond Counsel, interest on the Series 2017A Bonds is exempt from California personal income taxes. Ownership of the Series 2017A Bonds may result in other state and local tax consequences to certain taxpayers. Bond Counsel expresses no opinion regarding any such collateral consequences arising with respect to the Series 2017 Bonds. Prospective purchasers of the Series 2017 Bonds should consult their tax advisors regarding the applicability of any such state and local taxes. Series 2017B Bonds Interest on the Series 2017B Bonds is includible in gross income of the owners of the Series 2017B Bonds for federal income tax purposes and is subject to all applicable federal taxation. In the opinion of Bond Counsel, interest on the Series 2017B Bonds is exempt from personal income taxation imposed by the State of California. The following discussion is a brief summary of the principal United States Federal income tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of Series 2017B Bonds by original purchasers of the Series 2017B Bonds who are “U.S. Holders”, as defined in the seventh succeeding paragraph. This summary (i) is based on the Code, Treasury Regulations, revenue rulings and court decisions, all as currently in effect and all subject to change at any time, possibly with retroactive effect; (ii) assumes that the Series 2017B Bonds will be held as “capital assets”; and (iii) does not discuss all of the United States Federal income tax consequences that may be relevant to an owner of Series 2017B Bonds in light of its particular circumstances or to owners of Series 2017B Bonds subject to special rules, such as insurance companies, financial institutions, tax-exempt organizations, dealers in securities or foreign currencies, persons owning the Series 2017B Bonds as a position in a “hedge” or “straddle”, owners of Series 2017B Bonds whose functional currency (as defined in Section 985 of the Code) is not the United States dollar, June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 439 57 owners who acquire Series 2017B Bonds in the secondary market, or individuals, estates and trusts subject to the tax on unearned income imposed by Section 1411 of the Code. Owners of Series 2017B Bonds should consult with their own tax advisors concerning the United States Federal income tax and other consequences with respect to the acquisition, ownership and disposition of the Series 2017B Bonds as well as any tax consequences that may arise under the laws of any state, local or foreign tax jurisdiction. In general, if Original Issue Discount (“OID”) is greater than a statutorily defined de minimis amount, an owner of a Series 2017B Bond must include in Federal gross income (for each day of the taxable year, or portion of the taxable year, in which such owner owns such Series 2017B Bond) the daily portion of OID, as it accrues (generally on a constant yield method) and regardless of the owner‟s method of accounting. “OID” is the excess of (i) the “stated redemption price at maturity” over (ii) the “issue price”. For purposes of the foregoing: “issue price” means the first price at which a substantial amount of the Series 2017B Bond is sold to the public (excluding bond houses, brokers, or similar persons or organizations acting in the capacity of underwriters, placement agents or wholesalers); “stated redemption price at maturity” means the sum of all payments, other than “qualified stated interest”, provided by such Series 2017B Bond; “qualified stated interest” is stated interest that is unconditionally payable in cash or property (other than debt instruments of the issuer) at least annually at a single fixed rate; and “de minimis amount” is an amount equal to 0.25 percent of the Series 2017B Bond‟s stated redemption pric e at maturity multiplied by the number of complete years to its maturity. An owner of a Series 2017B Bond may irrevocably elect to include in gross income all interest that accrues on a Series 2017B Bond using the constant-yield method, subject to certain modifications. In general, if a Series 2017B Bond is originally issued for an issue price (excluding accrued interest) that reflects a premium over the sum of all amounts payable on the Series 2017B Bond other than “qualified stated interest” (a “Taxable Premium Bond”), that Taxable Premium Bond will be subject to Section 171 of the Code, relating to bond premium. In general, if the owner of a Taxable Premium Bond elects to amortize the premium as “amortizable bond premium” over the remaining term of the Taxable Premium Bond, determined based on constant yield principles (in certain cases involving a Taxable Premium Bond callable prior to its stated maturity date, the amortization period and yield may be required to be determined on the basis of an earlier call date that results in the highest yield on such Taxable Premium Bond), the amortizable premium is treated as an offset to interest income; the owner will make a corresponding adjustment to the owner‟s basis in the Taxable Premium Bond. Any such election is generally irrevocable and applies to all debt instruments of the owner (other than tax-exempt bonds) held at the beginning of the first taxable year to which the election applies and to all such debt instruments thereafter acquired. Under certain circumstances, the owner of a Taxable Premium Bond may realize a taxable gain upon disposition of the Taxable Premium Bond even though it is sold or redeemed for an amount less than or equal to the owner‟s original acquisition cost. Generally, upon the sale, exchange, redemption, or other disposition (which would include a legal defeasance) of a Series 2017B Bond, an owner of a Series 2017B Bond generally will recognize taxable gain or loss in an amount equal to the difference between the amount realized (other than amounts attributable to accrued interest not previously includable in income) and such owner‟s adjusted tax basis in the Series 2017B Bond. The Successor Agency may cause the deposit of moneys or securities in escrow in such amount and manner as to cause the Series 2017B Bonds to be deemed to be no longer outstanding under the Indenture (a “defeasance”). See APPENDIX D–“SUMMARY OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE INDENTURE.” For Federal income tax purposes, such defeasance could result in a deemed exchange under Section 1001 of the Code and a recognition by an owner of Series 2017B Bonds of taxable income or loss, without any June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 440 58 corresponding receipt of moneys. In addition, the character and timing of receipt of payments on the Series 2017B Bonds subsequent to any such defeasance could also be affected. In general, information reporting requirements will apply to non-corporate owners of the Series 2017B Bonds with respect to payments of principal, payments of interest, and the accrual of OID on a Series 2017B Bond and the proceeds of the sale of a Series 2017B Bond before maturity within the United States. Backup withholding may apply to owners of Series 2017B Bonds under Section 3406 of the Code. Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules from a payment to a beneficial owner, and which constitutes over-withholding, would be allowed as a refund or a credit against such beneficial owner‟s United States Federal income tax provided the required information is furnished to the Internal Revenue Service. The term “U.S. Holder” means a beneficial owner of a Series 2017B Bond that is: (i) a citizen or resident of the United States, (ii) a corporation, partnership or other entity created or organized in or under the laws of the United States or of any political subdivision thereof, (iii) an estate the income of which is subject to United States Federal income taxation regardless of its source or (iv) a trust whose administration is subject to the primary jurisdiction of a United States court and which has one or more United States fiduciaries who have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust. Forms of Bond Counsel Opinions The complete text of the final opinions that Bond Counsel expects to deliver upon issuance of the Series 2017A Bonds are set forth in Appendix F. NO MATERIAL LITIGATION To the best knowledge of the Successor Agency, there is no action, suit, proceeding, or investigation at law or in equity before any court or any governmental agency or body pending with respect to which the Successor agency has been served with process or threatened against the Successor Agency to restrain or enjoin the authorization, execution, or delivery of the Series 2017 Bonds, the Indenture, the Escrow Agreements, the collection of the Tax Revenues, or in any way contesting or affecting the validity of such documents or the proceedings of the Successor Agency taken with respect thereto or which, in any manner, questions the right of the Successor Agency to use the Tax Revenues for repayment of the Series 2017 Bonds. RATINGS S&P Global Ratings, a business unit of Standard & Poor‟s Financial Services LLC (“S&P”) [is expected to assign a rating of “___” based upon the issuance of the Municipal Bond Insurance Policy by the Bond Insurer on the date the Series 2017 Bonds are delivered. See “MUNICIPAL BOND INSURANCE.”] S&P has also assigned a[n underlying] rating of “__” to the Series 2017 Bonds. Certain information was supplied by the Successor Agency to S&P to be considered in evaluating the Series 2017 Bonds. The rating[s] issued reflect[s] only the views of S&P and is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold the Series 2017 Bonds. Any explanation of the significance of such rating[s] may be obtained from Standard & Poor‟s, 55 Water Street, New York, New York 10041. There is no assurance that the rating[s] will be retained for any given period of time or that the same will not be revised downward or withdrawn entirely by S&P if in its judgment, circumstances so warrant. Any such June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 441 59 downward revision or withdrawal of the rating[s] obtained may have an adverse effect on the market price of the Series 2017 Bonds. UNDERWRITING The Series 2017 Bonds were purchased through negotiation by Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated (the “Underwriter”) pursuant to the terms of a Bond Purchase Agreement, dated _______, 2017 (the “Purchase Agreement”) between the Successor Agency and the Underwriter. The Purchase Agreement provides that the Underwriter will purchase all of the Series 2017 Bonds, if any are purchased, the obligation to make such purchase being subject to certain terms and conditions set forth in said purchase agreement, the approval of certain legal matters by counsel and certain other conditions. The Underwriter may change the initial public offering prices set forth on the inside cover page of this Official Statement. The Underwriter may offer and sell the Series 2017 Bonds to certain dealers and others at prices lower than the public offering prices set forth on the inside cover page hereof. Series 2017A Bonds The Underwriter purchased the Series 2017A Bonds at a price equal to $_______ (which represents the principal amount of the Series 2017A Bonds, plus an original issue premium in the amount of $_______ and less an underwriter‟s discount in the amount of $_______). Series 2017B Bonds The Underwriter purchased the Series 2017B Bonds at a price equal to $_______ (which represents the principal amount of the Series 2017B Bonds, plus an original issue premium in the amount of $_______ and less an underwriter‟s discount in the amount of $_______). CONTINUING DISCLOSURE The Successor Agency will execute and deliver a Continuing Disclosure Certificate to Digital Assurance Certification, L.L.C., as Dissemination Agent, to be dated the date of delivery of the Series 2017 Bonds (the “Continuing Disclosure Certificate”), which provides for certain disclosure obligations on the part of the Successor Agency. Pursuant to the Continuing Disclosure Certificate, the Successor Agency will covenant for the benefit of Owners and Beneficial Owners of the Series 2017 Bonds to provide certain financial information and operating data relating to the Successor Agency by not later than the date that is nine months after the end of its fiscal year (currently March 31), commencing with the report due March 31, 2018 for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2017 (the “Annual Report”), and to provide notices of the occurrence of certain specified events (the “Specified Events”). The Annual Report and notices of Specified Events will be filed by the Successor Agency or the Dissemination Agent, through the Electronic Municipal Market Access (“EMMA”) site maintained by the MSRB. These covenants will be made in order to assist the Underwriter in complying with Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 15c2-12(b)(5) (the “Rule”). For a form of the Continuing Disclosure Certificate, see APPENDIX E–“PROPOSED FORM OF CONTINUING DISCLOSURE CERTIFICATE.” [Description of failures to comply with prior undertakings for previous five years – To Come] June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 442 60 The Successor Agency has established procedures intended to ensure future compliance with its continuing disclosure undertakings, including the appointment of Digital Assurance Certification, L.L.C., as Dissemination Agent for all bond transactions for which it has continuing disclosure undertakings; and the designation of the County Administrator, the Director of Conservation and Development, and the County Finance Director, or their written designees as the Disclosure Representative for the Successor Agency. REPORT OF THE FISCAL CONSULTANT The Fiscal Consultant prepared the Fiscal Consultant Report which, among other things, analyzes the tax increment revenues generated from taxable property within the Project Areas and pledged to the repayment of the Series 2017 Bonds. The findings and projections in the Fiscal Consultant Report are subject to a number of assumptions that should be reviewed and considered by prospective investors. No assurances can be given that the projections and expectations discussed in the Fiscal Consultant Report will be achieved. Actual results may differ materially from the projections described therein. See “THE PROJECT AREAS” and APPENDIX B–“FISCAL CONSULTANT REPORT.” MUNICIPAL ADVISOR The Successor Agency has retained Montague DeRose and Associates, LLC, Walnut Creek, California, as Municipal Advisor (the “Municipal Advisor”) for the sale of the Series 2017 Bonds. The Municipal Advisor is an independent municipal financial advisor and is not engaged in the business of underwriting, trading or distributing municipal or other financial securities. The Municipal Advisor takes no responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or fairness of this Official Statement. Compensation paid to the Municipal Advisor is contingent on the sale and delivery of the Series 2017 Bonds. VERIFICATION OF MATHEMATICAL COMPUTATIONS Causey Demgen & Moore P.C., a firm of independent public accountants (the “Verification Agent”), will deliver to the Successor Agency, on or before the settlement date of the Series 2017 Bonds, its verification report indicating that it has verified, in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, computations by the Underwriter relating to the adequacy of cash and securities to be held pursuant to the Escrow Agreements to make the required payments on the Authority Prior Bonds, and the mathematical accuracy of the mathematical computations of yield used by Bond Counsel to support its opinion that interest on the Series 2017 Bonds will be excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes. The verification performed by the Verification Agent will be solely based upon data, information and documents provided to Verification Agent by the Underwriter and its representatives. The Verification Agent has restricted its procedures to recalculating the computations provided by the Underwriter and its representatives and has not evaluated or examined the assumptions or information used in the computations. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 443 61 MISCELLANEOUS This Official Statement is not to be construed as a contract or agreement between the Successor Agency and the purchasers of the Series 2017 Bonds. Any statements made in this Official Statement involving matters of opinion or of estimates, whether or not so expressly stated, are set forth as such and not as representations of fact, and no representation is made that any of the estimates will be realized. The information and expressions of opinion herein are subject to change without notice and neither the delivery of the Official Statement nor any sale made hereunder shall, under any circumstances, create any implication that there has been no change in the affairs of the Successor Agency since the date hereof. References are made herein to certain documents and reports which are brief summaries thereof which do not purport to be complete or definitive and reference is made to such documents and reports for full and complete statements of the contents thereof. Copies of such documents and reports are available for inspection at the office of the Successor Agency, County of Contra Costa, 30 Muir Road, Martinez, California 94553. The execution and delivery of the Official Statement has been duly authorized by the Successor Agency. SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY By: John Kopchik, Director Department of Conservation and Development of the County of Contra Costa June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 444 A-i APPENDIX A GENERAL COUNTY ECONOMIC AND DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION TABLE OF CONTENTS Page General ...................................................................................................................................................... A-1 County Government .................................................................................................................................. A-1 Population ................................................................................................................................................. A-3 Industry and Employment ......................................................................................................................... A-4 Major Employers ...................................................................................................................................... A-5 Personal Income ........................................................................................................................................ A-5 Commercial Activity ................................................................................................................................. A-7 Construction Activity ................................................................................................................................ A-8 Transportation ........................................................................................................................................... A-9 Education and Health Services ............................................................................................................... A-10 INDEX OF TABLES Table A-1 Population Estimates ........................................................................................................... A-3 Table A-2 Industry Employment Labor Force ...................................................................................... A-4 Table A-3 Major Employers in the County........................................................................................... A-5 Table A-4 Personal Income................................................................................................................... A-6 Table A-5 Taxable Transactions ........................................................................................................... A-7 Table A-6 Building Permit Valuations ................................................................................................. A-8 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 445 A-1 APPENDIX A GENERAL COUNTY ECONOMIC AND DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION The following information concerning the County of Contra Costa (the “County”) is included only for the purpose of supplying general information. The Series 2017 Bonds are not a debts of the County, the State of California or any of its political subdivisions, other than the Successor Agency, and none of the County, the State of California, or any of its political subdivisions, other than the Successor Agency is liable therefor. General The County of Contra Costa, California (the “County”) was incorporated in 1850 as one of the original 27 counties of the State of California (the “State”), with the City of Martinez as the County seat. It is one of the nine counties in the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Area and is located in the region east of the San Francisco Bay known as the “East Bay,” which also includes the County of Alameda. The County covers about 733 square miles and extends from the northeastern shore of the San Francisco Bay easterly about 50 miles to San Joaquin County. The County is bordered on the south and west by Alameda County and on the north by the Suisun and San Pablo Bays. The western and northern shorelines are highly industrialized, while the interior sections are suburban/residential, commercial and light industrial. The County contains 19 incorporated cities, including Richmond in the west, Antioch in the northeast, and Concord in the middle. A large part of the County is served by the San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District (“BART”), which has enabled the expansion of both residential and commercial development throughout much of the County. In addition, economic development along the Interstate 680 corridor in the County has been substantial and has accounted for significant job creation and residential and commercial development throughout the County. County Government The County has a general law form of government. A five-member Board of Supervisors, each member of which is elected to a four-year term, serves as the County‟s legislative body. Also elected are the County Assessor, Auditor-Controller (the “County Auditor-Controller”), Clerk-Recorder, District Attorney-Public Administrator, Sheriff-Coroner and Treasurer-Tax Collector (the “County Treasurer”). A County Administrator appointed by the Board of Supervisors runs the day-to-day business of the County. The current County Administrator is David J. Twa. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 446 A-2 Contra Costa County Elected Officials Name Office Expiration of Current Term John M. Gioia Supervisor, District 1 January 7, 2019 Candace Andersen Supervisor, District 2 January 2, 2021 Diane Burgis Supervisor, District 3 January 2, 2021 Karen Mitchoff Supervisor, District 4 January 7, 2019 Federal D. Glover Supervisor, District 5 January 2, 2021 Robert R. Campbell Auditor-Controller January 7, 2019 Russell V. Watts Treasurer-Tax Collector January 7, 2019 Gus S. Kramer Assessor January 7, 2019 Joe Canciamilla Clerk Recorder January 7, 2019 Mark A. Peterson District Attorney-Public Administrator January 7, 2019 David O. Livingston Sheriff-Coroner January 7, 2019 Brief resumes of key County officials are set forth below. David J. Twa, County Administrator. Mr. Twa was appointed County Administrator by the Board of Supervisors in June 2008 and is responsible for the overall administration of County government, including managing more than 9,000 employees, and an annual budget of more than $3.3 billion (of which, more than $1.5 billion is attributed to the County General Fund), and working with more than 20 departments, agencies, and special districts. Prior to his appointment, he served as the County Manager for Ramsey County, Minnesota from 2003-2008. Prior to that, Mr. Twa served as the County Administrator in three counties in Minnesota for over 20 years and served as an Elected County Attorney, Interim Property Records and Revenue Director, Executive Director of Housing and Redevelopment Authority, and Interim Director of Public Health and Long-term Care. Mr. Twa received his Juris Doctorate from the University of Minnesota, as well as a degree in accounting, and is also a Certified Public Accountant. Mr. Twa was named the County Manager of the Year (2007) by the Minnesota Association of County Administrators for his innovation in public service. Robert R. Campbell, Auditor-Controller. Mr. Campbell was elected Auditor-Controller of the County in June 2010 and is the chief accounting officer for the County. Prior to his election to the Office of Auditor-Controller, Mr. Campbell was the Chief Accountant over the property tax division. Mr. Campbell has worked for the County for more than 25 years. He received a Bachelor of Science degree in business administration from the California State University, Hayward. Mr. Campbell is an active member of the State Association of County Auditors, a member of the Government Finance Officers Association and the Association of Government Accountants. Mr. Campbell is a former president of the State Association of County Auditors Property Tax and Payroll Managers‟ committees, and served as a member on various State Association‟s Property Tax Guideline Committees. Russell V. Watts, Treasurer-Tax Collector. Mr. Watts was elected Treasurer-Tax Collector in June 2010. In this capacity he also serves as ex officio member on the Board of Trustees of the Contra Costa County Employees‟ Retirement Association, representing the County at large. Mr. Watts also serves on the County‟s Debt Advisory Committee and the OPEB Trust Advisory Group, and is the Plan Administrator for the Public Agencies Post-Retirement Health Care Plan Trust. Mr. Watts is a member of the California Association of County Treasurer-Tax Collectors and serves on both the Executive and Legislative Committees. He is also a member of the Government Finance Officers Association. Mr. Watts has sat on the Contra Costa County Treasury Oversight Committee since 2003. Mr. Watts received his Bachelor of Arts from Brigham Young University and earned his Masters in Public Administration at June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 447 A-3 the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill. He has worked in tax administration and treasury management since 1994. Population The County is the ninth most populous county in California, with its estimated population reaching approximately 1,139,513 as of January 1, 2017. The following Table A-1 sets forth the County‟s population levels for 2013 through 2017. Population growth in the County has been strongest in unincorporated areas as well as in the cities of Antioch, Brentwood, Hercules, Oakley, Pittsburg and San Ramon. The following is a summary of the County‟s population levels. Table A-1 County of Contra Costa and State of California Population Estimates (as of January 1) 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 County 1,083,340 1,097,172 1,111,143 1,126,824 1,139,513 California 38,239,207 38,567,459 38,907,642 39,189,035 39,523,613 __________________ Source: State Department of Finance, E-1 Population Estimates for Cities, Counties and the State with Annual Percent Change – January 1, 2016 and 2017 Sacramento, California, May 2017. (Remainder of this Page Intentionally Left Blank) June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 448 A-4 Industry and Employment As shown below, the County‟s civilian labor force was 544,900 in 2015. With average 2015 unemployment rates of 5.0% and 6.2% for the County and the State, respectively, the County has achieved a lower unemployment rate than that of the State since 2011. Table A-2 County of Contra Costa Industry Employment Labor Force By Annual Averages 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015(1) Civilian Labor Force(2) 529,600 536,600 539,300 542,800 549,900 Employment 475,000 488,600 498,900 509,400 522,400 County Unemployment 54,500 48,000 40,400 33,400 27,500 Unemployment Rate: County 10.3% 8.9% 7.5% 6.2% 5.0% State of California 11.7% 10.4% 8.9% 7.5% 6.2% Wage and Salary Employment(3) Total Farm 800 800 800 800 800 Mining, Logging and Construction 17,800 19,600 21,700 21,800 22,700 Durable Goods 6,700 7,000 6,500 6,600 6,800 Nondurable Goods 10,900 10,600 8,900 8,700 8,400 Wholesale Trade 7,900 8,200 8,700 9,200 9,600 Retail Trade 40,500 41,200 41,100 41,600 42,300 Transportation, Warehousing and Utilities 8,100 8,100 8,900 9,600 10,500 Information 9,000 8,400 8,600 8,300 8,300 Financial Activities 24,800 25,300 25,300 25,000 26,200 Professional and Business Services 45,900 48,100 52,100 53,200 50,200 Educational and Health Services 54,300 56,400 59,500 61,500 63,900 Leisure and Hospitality 32,300 33,500 35,400 36,300 38,400 Other Services 12,400 12,400 12,100 12,500 12,600 Government 47,800 47,900 48,200 49,200 49,400 TOTAL 318,300 326,800 337,000 343,400 349,200 __________________ (1) Preliminary. Most recent annual data available. (2) Based on place of residence. (3) Based on place of work. Data may not total due to independent rounding. Source: State of California, Employment Development Department, Labor Market Information Division. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 449 A-5 Major Employers Major industries in the County include petroleum refining, telecommunications, financial and retail services, steel manufacturing, prefabricated metals, chemicals, electronic equipment, paper products and food processing. Most of the County‟s heavy manufacturing is located along the County‟s northern boundary fronting on the Suisun Bay and San Pablo Bay leading to San Francisco Bay and the Pacific Ocean. The following Table A-3 provides a listing of major employers headquartered or with locations in the County and their estimated firm-wide employment levels. Table A-3 County of Contra Costa MAJOR EMPLOYERS IN THE COUNTY 2017 Employer Name Location Industry Approximate Number of Employees Contra Costa County Martinez County government 9,300 Chevron Corp. San Ramon Energy, chemicals and petroleum company 6,300 John Muir Health Walnut Creek Health care system 6,190 West Contra Costa Unified School District Richmond Public education 3,300 San Ramon Valley School District Danville Public education 3,190 Bio-Rad Laboratories Hercules Manufacturer and supplier 3,100 Contra Costa Community College District Martinez Higher education 3,100 24 Hour Fitness USA Inc. San Ramon Health and fitness club chain 1,980 GE Digital San Ramon Digital industrial company 1,500 St. Mary‟s College Moraga Higher education 1,200 CSAA Insurance Group, AAA Insurer Walnut Creek Personal lines insurance 760 Shell Martinez Oil Refinery 700 Tesoro Refining & Marketing Co. Martinez Petroleum products refiner and marketer 650 Dow Chemical Pittsburg Chemical Manufacturer 500 __________________ Sources: San Francisco Business Times, 2017 Book of Lists, websites of individual companies and contacting individual companies. Personal Income The United States Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis (the “BEA”) produces economic accounts statistics that enable government and business decision-makers, researchers, and the public to follow and understand the performance of the national economy. The BEA defines “personal income” as income received by persons from all sources, including income received from participation in production as well as from government and business transfer payments. Personal income represents the sum of compensation of employees (received), supplements to wages and salaries, proprietors‟ income with inventory valuation adjustment and capital consumption adjustment (CCAdj), rental income of persons with CCAdj, personal income receipts on assets, and personal current transfer receipts, less contributions for government social insurance. Per capita personal income is calculated as the personal income divided by the resident population based upon the Census Bureau‟s annual midyear population estimates. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 450 A-6 Table A-4 below presents the latest available personal income data for the County, the State and the United States for the calendar years 2011 through 2015 (the most recent annual data available). Table A-4 County of Contra Costa Personal Income Calendar Years 2011-2015† Year and Area Personal Income (millions of dollars) Per Capita Personal Income (dollars) 2011 County $ 61,156 $ 57,336 State 1,727,434 45,820 United States 13,233,436 42,453 2012 County $ 66,344 $ 61,470 State 1,838,567 48,312 United States 13,904,485 44,267 2013 County $ 66,608 $ 60,776 State 1,861,957 48,471 United States 14,068,960 44,462 2014 County $ 69,527 $ 62,540 State 1,977,924 50,988 United States 14,801,624 46,414 2015† County $ 74,757 $ 66,348 State 2,103,669 53,741 United States 15,463,981 48,112 ___________________ † Most recent annual data available. Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 451 A-7 Commercial Activity Commercial activity in the County contributed toward taxable transactions totaling approximately $14.47 billion in 2013, $15.03 billion in 2014 and $15.67 billion (preliminary) in 2015. Presented in Table A-5 below is a summary of taxable transactions in the County for the calendar years 2011 through 2014, the most recent year for which final calendar year data is available, and preliminary data for 2015. Table A-5 County of Contra Costa Taxable Transactions Calendar Years 2011-2015 ($ in 000’s) Type of Business 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015† Motor Vehicle and Parts Dealers $1,372,234 $1,650,526 $1,823,019 $1,988,813 $2,245,947 Furniture and Home Furnishings Stores 240,863 260,102 277,477 281,245 – Home Furnishings and Appliance Stores – – – – 686,740 Electronic and Appliance Stores 357,941 371,588 371,275 377,730 – Building Material and Garden Equipment Supplies and Dealers 739,836 791,073 879,211 915,362 1,060,312 Food and Beverage Stores 692,641 725,277 748,131 779,552 816,995 Health and Personal Care Stores 277,662 293,030 303,182 311,288 Gasoline Stations 1,522,725 1,587,047 1,623,539 1,599,455 1,341,604 Clothing and Clothing Accessories Stores 702,573 773,210 825,235 855,415 902,810 Sporting Goods, Hobby, Book, and Music Stores 303,397 302,051 312,720 298,256 – General Merchandise Stores 1,443,317 1,505,629 1,525,347 1,540,971 1,392,414 Miscellaneous Store Retailers 396,831 420,581 427,955 448,571 – Nonstore Retailers 50,078 87,720 180,980 210,752 – Food Services and Drinking Places 1,200,318 1,294,601 1,378,947 1,484,799 1,613,644 Other Retail Group – – – – 1,359,781 TOTAL RETAIL AND FOOD SERVICES 9,300,418 10,062,437 10,677,018 11,092,210 11,420,249 All Other Outlets 3,499,439 3,934,812 3,794,970 3,937,836 4,249,805 TOTAL ALL OUTLETS $12,799,857 $13,997,249 $14,471,988 $15,030,047 $15,670,053 ______________________ † Preliminary. Column does not total due to independent rounding. Calendar year data by type of business is not yet available. Data for 2015 was compiled from quarterly reports and is subject to change. Source: California State Board of Equalization. Much of the County‟s commercial activity is concentrated in central business districts of its cities and unincorporated towns. Regional shopping centers, numerous smaller centers and several “big box” warehouse stores serve County residents. The County is served by all major banks including Bank of America and Wells Fargo Bank. In addition there are numerous local banks and branches of smaller California and foreign banks. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 452 Construction Activity The total value of building permits in the County increased by 37.3% in calendar year 2015 compared to calendar year 2014 levels due primarily to increases in residential building permits issued for the construction of multi-family residences. The following Table A-6 provides a summary of residential building permit valuations and number of new dwelling units authorized in the County from calendar year 2011 through 2015. Table A-6 COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA BUILDING PERMIT VALUATIONS CALENDAR YEARS 2011 THROUGH 2015 ($ IN THOUSANDS) Residential Non Residential Alterations Total Alterations Total Single Family Multifamily and Residential and Non Year Unit Valuation Units Valuation Additions Valuation Industrial Commercial Other Additions Residential Total 2011 718 $211,417.9 355 $47,304.2 $197,448.0 $456,170.1 $7,188.0 $27,931.3 $39,617.1 $214,585.0 $289,321.4 $745,491.5 2012 1,188 340,255.6 949 54,884.8 179,471.7 574,612.1 7,000.8 27,397.8 56,056.3 124,147.2 214,602.0 789,214.1 2013 1,585 469,376.5 370 62,799.7 195,787.4 727,963.6 8,927.8 27,976.8 76,946.0 220,737.0 334,557.6 1,062,521.2 2014 1,439 402,109.1 588 82,009.6 256,617.8 740,735.5 21,149.5 142,730.7 54,800.9 191,855.7 410,536.9 1,151,272.3 2015† 1,909 629,638.5 629 123,088.7 301,221.7 1,053,948.9 15,020.1 206,595.9 85,880.1 219,320.4 526,816.5 1,580,765.4 _______________ † Most recent annual data available. Source: Construction Industry Research Board. A service provided by the California Homebuilding Foundation. A-8 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 453 A-9 Transportation Availability of a broad transportation network has been one of the major factors in the County‟s economic and population growth. Interstate 80 connects the western portion of the County to San Francisco and the central portion of the County to Sacramento and points north via Interstate 5, the major north-south highway from Mexico to Canada. Interstate 680 connects the central County communities to the rest of the Bay Area and portions of the Central Valley of the State via State Routes 4 and 24, the County‟s major east-west arteries. Ground transportation is provided to County residents from multiple service providers. BART connects the County to Alameda County, San Francisco, and Daly City and Colma in San Mateo County with two main lines, one from the San Francisco area to Richmond and the other to the Walnut Creek/Concord/Pittsburg/Bay Point area. BART currently has 46 stations and 112 miles of roadway in its system, including the Warm Springs/South Fremont Station that opened in March 2017. The Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority is managing a two phase BART expansion project into Silicon Valley. The first phase, is a 10-mile, two station extension to the Milpitas Station (expected to open for passenger service in late fall 2017) and to Berryessa Station (expected to open for passenger service in 2018). The second phase will extend BART six miles to the City of Santa Clara and is projected to begin passenger service in 2026. Rail passenger service (eBART) with stations in the cities of Pittsburg and Antioch expected to begin passenger service in winter 2017-18. Public transit bus lines throughout. Other bus service is provided by Greyhound. Commuter rail service is provided by the AMTRAK Capital Corridor, with daily runs between the Bay Area and Sacramento that stops at the intermodal terminal in Martinez, the County seat. Commercial water transportation and docking facilities are available through a number of port and marina locations in the County. The Port of Richmond on San Francisco Bay and several privately owned industrial docks on both San Pablo and Suisun Bays serve the heavy industry located in the area. The Port of Richmond, owned and operated by the City of Richmond, covers approximately 200 acres and handles approximately 19 million metric tons annually. The majority of the shipments are bulk liquids with the remainder consisting of scrap metal, autos, and gypsum rock. Major scheduled airline passenger and freight transportation for County residents is available at either Oakland or San Francisco International Airports, located about 20 and 30 miles, respectively, from the County. In addition there are two general aviation fields. The Byron Airport is located in the eastern part of the County and Buchanan Field Airport is located in Concord. JetSuite provides charter and scheduled flights from Buchanan Field Airport to Burbank, California and to Las Vegas, Nevada. Education and Health Services Education. Public school education in the County is available through seven unified school districts, nine elementary school districts, two high school districts, and one community college. These districts provide 19 charter schools, 154 elementary schools, 46 middle schools, 32 high schools, and 13 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 454 A-10 continuation high schools, and a number of special education facilities, and other educational programs. Public school K-12 enrollment for Fiscal Year 2015-16 numbered approximately 176,413 students. Private school enrollment in the County for Fiscal Year 2014-15 (the most recent Fiscal Year for which County data is available) numbered approximately 19,800 students, which was approximately 11.2% of students in the County. Higher education is available in the County through a combination of two-year community colleges and four-year colleges. The Contra Costa Community College District is comprised of Contra Costa College (San Pablo, California), Diablo Valley College (Pleasant Hill, California) with satellite centers in San Ramon and Walnut Creek, Los Medanos College (Pittsburg, California). California State University East Bay (Hayward, California) operates a branch campus in Concord. St. Mary‟s College of California is a four-year private institution located in Moraga. Also located within the County are the John F. Kennedy University campuses in Concord and Pleasant Hill. In addition, County residents are within commuting distance to the University of California, Berkeley. Health Services. There are six privately operated hospitals, one public hospital and one Veterans‟ Affairs hospital located in the County, with a combined total of approximately 1,850 beds. Three of the private hospitals are run by Kaiser, the largest health maintenance organization in the United States. The Walnut Creek-based John Muir/Mt. Diablo Health System operates hospitals at its Walnut Creek and Concord campuses, and outpatient and urgent care services in Brentwood, Concord, San Ramon, and in the Tice Valley/Rossmoor area of Walnut Creek. In addition the Sutter Delta Medical Center operates a hospital in Antioch. Under State law, the County is required to administer State and federal health programs, provide for community mental health and treatment programs, and provide for a portion of the costs of such services with local revenues, such as sales and property taxes. The County Health Services Department (the “Health Services Department”) provides these services to all County residents regardless of their ability to pay. The Health Services Department is responsible for providing a comprehensive health system to residents of the County including the following: clinical and laboratory services; maternal, child and adolescent health services; public health clinics services; mental health services; alcohol and drug treatment services; programs related to the prevention of disease and injury (e.g., tobacco education, senior health education); community nutrition projects; and obesity and asthma prevention. The public hospital in the County is the 164-bed Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (“CCRMC”) located in Martinez. The County also operates a public health/clinical laboratory and an ambulatory care clinic on the CCRMC campus, the Pittsburg Health Center on the former Los Medanos Hospital site, health clinics in Antioch, Concord and Brentwood, the Bay Point Family Health Center, which includes a state-of-the-art children‟s dental clinic, and the approximately 53,000 square foot West County Health Center in Richmond. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 455 B-1 APPENDIX B FISCAL CONSULTANT REPORT June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 456 C-1 APPENDIX C AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2016 The Successor Agency is a separate legal entity from the County, with assets and liabilities entirely separate from the assets and liabilities of the County. The Series 2017 Bonds are payable from and secured by a pledge of Tax Revenues only. The Comprehensive Annual Financial Report of the County for the Year Ended June 30, 2016 is included only because it includes the audited financial statements of the Successor Agency. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 457 D-1 APPENDIX D SUMMARY OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE INDENTURE June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 458 E-1 APPENDIX E FORM OF CONTINUING DISCLOSURE CERTIFICATE This Continuing Disclosure Certificate (the “Disclosure Certificate”) dated _______, 2017 is executed and delivered by the Successor Agency to the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency (the “Successor Agency”), and acknowledged and agreed to by Digital Assurance Certification, L.L.C., as dissemination agent, in connection with the issuance by the Successor Agency of $_________ aggregate principal amount of Successor Agency to the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds, Series 2017A; and $_________ aggregate principal amount of Successor Agency to the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency Taxable Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds, Series 2017B (together, the “Series 2017 Bonds”). The Series 2017 Bonds are being issued pursuant to an Indenture of Trust dated as of _______ 1, 2017 (the “Indenture”) between the Successor Agency and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (the “Trustee”). The Successor Agency and the Dissemination Agent covenant and agree as follows: SECTION 1. Purpose of the Disclosure Certificate. The Disclosure Certificate is being executed and delivered by the Successor Agency and the Dissemination Agency for the benefit of the Owners and Beneficial Owners of the Series 2017 Bonds and in order to assist the Participating Underwriter in complying with S.E.C. Rule 15c2-12(b)(5). SECTION 2. Definitions. In addition to the definitions set forth in the Indenture, which apply to any capitalized term used in the Disclosure Certificate unless otherwise defined in this Section, the following capitalized terms shall have the following meanings: “Annual Report” shall mean any Annual Report provided by the Successor Agency pursuant to, and as described in, Sections 3 and 4 of the Disclosure Certificate. “Beneficial Owner” shall mean any person which (a) has the power, directly or indirectly, to vote or consent with respect to, or to dispose of ownership of, any Series 2017 Bonds (including persons holding Series 2017 Bonds through nominees, depositories or other intermediaries) or (b) is treated as the owner of any Series 2017 Bonds for federal income tax purposes. “Disclosure Representative” shall mean the County Administrator, the Director of Conservation and Development, and the County Finance Director or his or her designee, or such other officer or employee as the County shall designate in writing to the Trustee from time to time. “Dissemination Agent” shall initially mean Digital Assurance Certification, L.L.C., or any successor Dissemination Agent which may be designated in writing by the Successor Agency and which has filed with the Successor Agency a written acceptance of such designation. “Filing Date” shall mean the date that is nine months following the end of each Fiscal Year of the Successor Agency (currently March 31 or the next succeeding business day if such day is not a business day), commencing with the first Filing Date of March 31, 2018. “Fiscal Year” shall mean the period beginning on July 1 of each year and ending on the next succeeding June 30, or any other twelve-month period hereafter selected and designated as the official fiscal year period of the Successor Agency and certified to the Trustee in writing by an Authorized Representative of the Successor Agency. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 459 E-2 “MSRB” shall mean the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board or any other entity designated or authorized by the Securities and Exchange Commission to receive reports pursuant to the Rule. Until otherwise designated by the MSRB or the Securities and Exchange Commission, filings with the MSRB are to be made through the Electronic Municipal Market Access (EMMA) website of the MSRB, currently located at http://emma.msrb.org. “Official Statement” means the Official Statement dated _______, 2017 relating to the Series 2017 Bonds. “Participating Underwriter” shall mean the original underwriter of the Series 2017 Bonds required to comply with the Rule in connection with offering of the Series 2017 Bonds. “Rule” shall mean Rule 15c2-12(b)(5) adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as the same may be amended from time to time. “Specified Event” shall mean any of the events listed in Section 5(a) or Section 5(b) of this Disclosure Certificate and any other event legally required to be reported pursuant to the Rule. “State” shall mean the State of California. SECTION 3. Provision of Annual Reports. (a) The Successor Agency shall, shall provide, or shall cause the Dissemination Agent to provide, to the MSRB not later than the Filing Date, an Annual Report which is consistent with the requirements of Section 4 of this Disclosure Certificate. The Annual Report shall be submitted in electronic format, accompanied by such identifying information as is prescribed by the MSRB, and may include by reference other information as provided in Section 4 of this Disclosure Certificate provided that, the audited financial statements of the Successor Agency may be submitted separately from the balance of the Annual Report and later than the Filing Date required above for the filing of the Annual Report if they are not available by that date. If the Fiscal Year of the Successor Agency changes, it shall give notice of such change in the same manner as for a Specified Event under Section 5. (b) Not later than thirty (30) days prior to each Filing Date, the Dissemination Agent shall give notice to the Successor Agency that the Annual Report is so required to be filed in accordance with the terms of this Disclosure Certificate. Not later than fifteen (15) Business Days prior to the Filing Date, the Successor Agency shall provide the Annual Report to the Dissemination Agent (if other than the Successor Agency). If by the Filing Date, the Dissemination Agent has not received a copy of the Annual Report, the Dissemination Agent shall notify the Successor Agency of such failure to receive the Annual Report. (c) The Dissemination Agent shall: 1. If the Successor Agency is unable to provide to the Dissemination Agent an Annual Report by the Filing Date, and if not previously filed by the Successor Agency, send a notice, in electronic format, to the MSRB in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit A. 2. File a report with the Successor Agency certifying that the Annual Report has been provided pursuant to this Disclosure Certificate and stating the date it was provided. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 460 E-3 SECTION 4. Content of Annual Reports. The Annual Report of the Successor Agency shall contain or include by reference the following: (a) The audited financial statements of the Successor Agency for the prior fiscal year, prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles as promulgated to apply to governmental entities from time to time by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board. If the audited financial statements of the Successor Agency are not available by the time the Annual Report is required to be filed pursuant to Section 3(a), the Annual Report shall contain unaudited financial statements in a format similar to the financial statements contained in the final Official Statement, and the audited financial statements shall be filed in the same manner as the Annual Report when they become available. (b) Numerical and tabular information for the immediately preceding Fiscal Year of the type contained in the Official Statement under the following captions: (i) Assessed values of property in the Project Areas in substantially the form of Table [7] of the Official Statement; (ii) Ten Largest Property Taxpayers in the Project Areas substantially in the form of Table [9] of the Official Statement; (iii) Issuance by the Successor Agency of any Parity Debt with respect to the Project Areas; (iv) Information about each resolved and open appeal of assessed values in the Project Areas that exceeds 5% of assessed value of the Project Areas substantially in the form of Table [10]; (v) Incremental taxable value, tax levy, current year collections, current collections as a percentage of current year levy collected, total collections and total collections as a percentage of the current year‟s tax levy in the Project Areas in substantially the form of Table [11] of the Official Statement; (vi) Amount of all Successor Agency debt outstanding secured by a pledge of the Tax Revenues from the Project Areas; (vii) [The outstanding principal amount of the Series 2017 Bonds, the debt service schedule, and debt service coverage]; and (viii) [The balance in the Reserve Account, if a municipal debt service reserve insurance policy is not deposited into the Reserve Account.] (c) In addition to any of the information expressly required to be provided under Sections 4(a) and 4(b), the Successor Agency shall provide such other information, if any, necessary to make the required information, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading. (d) The presentation and format of the Annual Report may be modified from time to time as determined in the sole judgment of the Successor Agency to conform to changes in accounting or disclosure principles or practices and legal requirements followed by or applicable to the Successor Agency to reflect changes in the business, structure, or operations of the Successor Agency; provided that any such modifications shall comply with the requirements of the Rule. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 461 E-4 (e) Any or all of the items listed in this Section 4 may be included by specific reference to other documents, including official statements of debt issues of the Successor Agency or related public entities, which have been made available to the public on the MSRB website. The Successor Agency shall clearly identify each such other document so included by reference. SECTION 5. Reporting of Significant Events. (a) Pursuant to the provisions of this Disclosure Certificate, the Successor Agency shall give, or cause to be given, notice of the occurrence of any of the following events with respect to the Series 2017 Bonds, in a timely manner no later than ten (10) Business Days after the occurrence of such event: 1. Principal and interest payment delinquencies; 2. Unscheduled draws on debt service reserves reflecting financial difficulties; 3. Unscheduled draws on credit enhancements reflecting financial difficulties; 4. Substitution of credit or liquidity providers, or their failure to perform; 5. Issuance by the Internal Revenue Service of proposed or final determination of taxability or of a Notice of Proposed Issue (IRS Form 5701 TEB); 6. Tender offers; 7. Defeasances; 8. Rating changes; or 9. Bankruptcy, insolvency, receivership or similar event of the Successor Agency. This event is considered to occur upon the happening of any of the following: the appointment of a receiver, fiscal agent or similar officer for an obligated person in a proceeding under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code or in any other proceeding under state or federal law in which a court or governmental authority has assumed jurisdiction over substantially all of the assets or business of the obligated person, or if such jurisdiction has been assumed by leaving the existing governmental body and officials or officers in possession but subject to the supervision and orders of a court or governmental authority, or the entry of an order confirming a plan of reorganization, arrangement or liquidation by a court or governmental authority having supervision or jurisdiction over substantially all of the assets or business of the obligated person. (b) The Successor Agency shall give, or cause to be given, notice to the MSRB of the occurrence of any of the following events described in this Section 5(b) with respect to the Series 2017 Bonds, if material, in a timely manner not later than ten (10) Business Days after the occurrence of the event: 1. Unless described in Section 5(a)(7) above, adverse tax opinions or other material notices or determinations by the Internal Revenue Service with respect to the tax status of the Series 2017 Bonds or other material events affecting the tax status of the Series 2017 Bonds; 2. Modifications to rights of the Bond holders; June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 462 E-5 3. Optional, unscheduled or contingent 2017 Bond calls; 4. Release, substitution, or sale of property securing repayment of the Series 2017 Bonds; 5. Non-payment related defaults; 6. The consummation of a merger, consolidation, or acquisition involving an obligated person or the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the obligated person, other than in the ordinary course of business, the entry into a definitive agreement to undertake such an action or the termination of a definitive agreement relating to any such actions, other than pursuant to its terms; or 7. Appointment of a successor or additional trustee or the change of name of a trustee. (c) The Successor Agency acknowledges that it is required to make a determination whether a Specified Event in Section 5(b) above is material under applicable federal securities laws in order to determine whether a filing with the MSRB is required under Section 5(b). Notwithstanding the foregoing, notice of Specified Events described in Section 5(a)(7) and Section 5(b)(2) above need not be given any earlier than the notice (if any) of the underlying event is given to Owners of affected Series 2017 Bonds pursuant to the Indenture. (d) If the Dissemination Agent has been instructed by the Successor Agency to report the occurrence of a Specified Event, the Dissemination Agent shall file a notice of such occurrence with the MSRB. Notwithstanding the foregoing, notice of Specified Events described in Section 5(a)(4) and Section 5(a)(5) need not be given under this subsection any earlier than the notice (if any) of the underlying event is given to Owners of affected Series 2017 Bonds pursuant to the Indenture. SECTION 6 CUSIP Numbers. Whenever providing information to the Dissemination Agent, including but not limited to Annual Reports, documents incorporated by reference to the Annual Reports, Audited Financial Statements and notices of Specified Events, the Successor Agency shall indicate the full name of the Series 2017 Bonds and the nine-digit CUSIP numbers for the Series 2017 Bonds as to which the provided information relates. SECTION 7 Termination of Reporting Obligation. The obligations of the Successor Agency under this Disclosure Certificate shall terminate upon the legal defeasance, prior redemption or payment in full of all of the Series 2017 Bonds. If such termination occurs prior to the final maturity of the Series 2017 Bonds, the Successor Agency shall give notice of such termination in the same manner as for a Specified Event under Section 5(c). SECTION 8. Dissemination Agent. (a) The Successor Agency may, from time to time, appoint or engage a Dissemination Agent to assist it in carrying out its obligations under this Disclosure Certificate, and may discharge any such Agent, with or without appointing a successor Dissemination Agent. (b) The initial Dissemination Agent shall be Digital Assurance Certification, L.L.C. If at any time there is no designated Dissemination Agent appointed by the Successor Agency, or if the Dissemination Agent so appointed is unwilling or unable to perform the duties of the Dissemination Agent hereunder, the Successor Agency shall be the Dissemination Agent an undertake or assume its obligations hereunder. The Dissemination Agent (other than the Successor Agency) shall not be June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 463 E-6 responsible in any manner for the content of any notice or report required to be delivered by the Successor Agency pursuant to this Disclosure Certificate. SECTION 9. Additional Information. Nothing in this Disclosure Certificate shall be deemed to prevent the Successor Agency from disseminating any other information, using the means of dissemination set forth in this Disclosure Certificate or any other means of communication, or including any other information in any Annual Report or notice of occurrence of a Specified Event, in addition to that which is required by this Disclosure Certificate. If the Successor Agency chooses to include any information in any Annual Report or notice of occurrence of a Specified Event in addition to that which is specifically required by this Disclosure Certificate, the Successor Agency shall have no obligation under this Disclosure Certificate to update such information or include it in any future Annual Report or notice of occurrence of a Specified Event. SECTION 10. Amendment; Waiver Notwithstanding any other provision of this Disclosure Certificate, the Successor Agency may amend this Disclosure Certificate, and any provision of this Disclosure Certificate may be waived, provided that the following conditions are satisfied: (a) If the amendment or waiver relates to the provisions of Sections 3(a), 4, or 5(a), it may only be made in connection with a change in circumstances that arises from a change in legal requirements, change in law, or change in the identity, nature or status of an obligated person with respect to such Series 2017 Bonds, or the type of business conducted; (b) The undertaking, as amended or taking into account such waiver, would, in the opinion of nationally recognized bond counsel, have complied with the requirements of the Rule at the time of the original issuance of the Series 2017 Bonds, after taking into account any amendments or interpretations of the Rule, as well as any change in circumstances; and (c) The amendment or waiver either (i) is approved by the Owners of the affected Series of Series 2017 Bonds in the same manner as provided in the Indenture for amendments to the Indenture with the consent of Owners, or (ii) does not, in the opinion of nationally recognized bond counsel, materially impair the interest of the Owners or Beneficial Owners of such Series 2017 Bonds. (e) In the event of any amendment or waiver of a provision of this Disclosure Certificate, the Successor Agency shall describe such amendment in the next Annual Report, and shall include, as applicable, a narrative explanation of the reason for the amendment or waiver and its impact on the type (or in the case of a change of accounting principles, on the presentation) of financial information or operating data being presented by the Successor Agency. In addition, if the amendment relates to the accounting principles to be followed in preparing financial statements, (i) notice of such change shall be given in the same manner as for a Specified Event under Section 5(c), and (ii) the Annual Report for the year in which the change is made should present a comparison (in narrative form and also, if feasible, in quantitative form) between the financial statements as prepared on the basis of the new accounting principles and those prepared on the basis of the former accounting principles. SECTION 11. Default. In the event of a failure of the Successor Agency to comply with any provision of this Disclosure Certificate, the Dissemination Agent or any Owners or Beneficial Owners of the Series 2017 Bonds may take such actions as may be necessary and appropriate, including seeking mandate or specific performance by court order, to cause the Successor Agency to comply with its obligations under this Disclosure Certificate; provided that any such action may be instituted only in the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of Contra Costa or in the U.S. District Court in the County of Contra Costa. A default under this Disclosure Certificate shall not be deemed an Event of Default under the Resolution, and the sole remedy under this Disclosure Certificate in the event June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 464 E-7 of any failure of the Successor Agency to comply with this Disclosure Certificate shall be an action to compel performance. SECTION 12. Duties, Immunities and Liabilities of Dissemination Agent. The Dissemination Agent shall have only such duties as are specifically set forth in this Disclosure Certificate, and the Successor Agency agrees to indemnify and save the Dissemination Agent, its officers, directors, employees and agents, harmless against any loss, expense and liabilities which it may incur arising out of or in the exercise or performance of its powers and duties hereunder, including the costs and expenses (including attorneys‟ fees) of defending against any claim of liability, but excluding liabilities due to the Dissemination Agent‟s gross negligence or willful misconduct. The obligations of the Successor Agency under this Section shall survive resignation or removal of the Dissemination Agent and payment of the Series 2017 Bonds. SECTION 13. Notices. Any notices or communications to or among any of the parties to this Disclosure Certificate may be given as follows: To the Successor Agency: County of Contra Costa Department of Conservation and Development 30 Muir Road Martinez, CA 94553 Attention: Director Telephone: 925-674-7866 If to the Dissemination Agent: Digital Assurance Certification, L.L.C. 390 North Orange Avenue, Suite 1750 Orlando, FL 32801-1674 Attention: Customer Assistance Telephone: 888-824-2663 Any person may, by written notice to the other persons listed above, designate a different address or telephone number(s) to which subsequent notices or communications should be sent. SECTION 14. Beneficiaries. This Disclosure Certificate shall inure solely to the benefit of the Successor Agency, the Dissemination Agent, the Participating Underwriter and Owners and Beneficial Owners from time to time of the Series 2017 Bonds, and shall create no rights in any other person or entity. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 465 E-8 SECTION 15. Counterparts. This Disclosure Certificate may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which shall constitute but one and the same instrument. Dated: _____________, 2017 SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY By:____________________________________ Authorized Representative Acknowledged and Agreed to: DIGITAL ASSURANCE CERTIFICATION, L.L.C., as Dissemination Agent By: Dissemination Agent June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 466 E-9 EXHIBIT A NOTICE TO MSRB OF FAILURE TO FILE ANNUAL REPORT Name of Issuer: Successor Agency to the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency Name of Bond Issue: Successor Agency to the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds, Series 2017A; and Successor Agency to the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency Taxable Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds, Series 2017B Date of Issuance: _______, 2017 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Successor Agency to the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency (the “Successor Agency”) has not provided an Annual Report with respect to the above-named Bonds as required by Section 5.01(n) of the Indenture dated as of ________ 1, 2017 between the Successor Agency and U.S. Bank National Association relating to the above-described Bonds. The Successor Agency anticipates that the Annual Report will be filed by _____________. Dated: _________________ The undersigned acknowledges and agrees to act as Dissemination Agent to the foregoing Disclosure Certificate. DIGITAL ASSURANCE CERTIFICATION, L.L.C., as Dissemination Agent By: cc: Successor Agency June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 467 F-1 APPENDIX F FORMS OF OPINIONS OF BOND COUNSEL Form of Opinion for the Series 2017A Bonds ____________, 2017 Successor Agency to the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency 30 Muir Road Martinez, California 94553 OPINION: $__________ Successor Agency to the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds, Series 2017A Members of the Successor Agency: We have acted as bond counsel in connection with the issuance by the Successor Agency to the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency, as successor to the former Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency (the “Former Agency”), of its $__________ Successor Agency to the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds, Series 2017A (the “Bonds”), pursuant to the provisions of section 34177.5 of the California Health and Safety Code and section 53580 et seq. of the California Government Code (collectively, the “Refunding Bond Law”), Resolution No. 2017/147 adopted by the Successor Agency on April 25, 2017, and an Indenture of Trust, dated as of __________ 1, 2017 (the “Indenture”), by and between the Successor Agency and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee. In connection with this opinion, we have examined the law and such certified proceedings and other papers as we deem necessary to render this opinion. As to questions of fact material to our opinion, we have relied upon representations of the Successor Agency contained in the Indenture and in the certified proceedings and certifications of public officials and others furnished to us, without undertaking to verify the same by independent investigation. Based upon the foregoing we are of the opinion, under existing law, as follows: 1. The Successor Agency is duly created and validly existing as a public body, corporate and politic, with the power to enter into the Indenture, perform the agreements on its part contained therein and issue the Bonds. 2. The Indenture has been duly approved by the Successor Agency and constitutes a valid and binding obligation of the Successor Agency enforceable upon the Successor Agency in accordance with its terms. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 468 F-2 3. Pursuant to the Refunding Bond Law, the Indenture creates a valid lien on the funds pledged by the Indenture for the security of the Bonds, on a parity with the pledge thereof for the security of the 2017B Bonds and any Parity Debt that may be issued pursuant to and as such capitalized terms are defined in the Indenture. 4. The Bonds have been duly authorized, executed and delivered by the Successor Agency and are valid and binding special obligations of the Successor Agency, payable solely from the sources provided therefor in the Indenture. 5. Subject to the Successor Agency‟s compliance with certain covenants, interest on the Bonds is excludable from gross income of the owners thereof for federal income tax purposes and is not included as an item of tax preference in computing the federal alternative minimum tax for individuals and corporations under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, but such interest is taken into account in computing an adjustment used in determining the federal alternative minimum tax for certain corporations. Failure to comply with certain of such covenants could cause interest on the Bonds to be includable in gross income for federal income tax purposes retroactively to the date of issuance of the Bonds. 6. The interest on the Bonds is exempt from personal income taxation imposed by the State of California. Ownership of the Bonds may result in other tax consequences to certain taxpayers, and we express no opinion regarding any such collateral consequences arising with respect to the Bonds. The rights of the owners of the Bonds and the enforceability of the Bonds and the Indenture may be subject to bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium and other similar laws affecting creditors‟ rights heretofore or hereafter enacted and also may be subject to the exercise of judicial discretion in accordance with general principles of equity. In rendering this opinion, we have relied upon certifications of the Successor Agency and others with respect to certain material facts. Our opinion represents our legal judgment based upon such review of the law and the facts that we deem relevant to render our opinion and is not a guarantee of a result. This opinion is given as of the date hereof and we assume no obligation to revise or supplement this opinion to reflect any facts or circumstances that may hereafter come to our attention or any changes in law that may hereafter occur. Respectfully submitted, June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 469 F-3 Form of Opinion for the Series 2017B Bonds ____________, 2017 Successor Agency to the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency 30 Muir Road Martinez, California 94553 OPINION: $__________ Successor Agency to the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency Taxable Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds, Series 2017B Members of the Successor Agency: We have acted as bond counsel in connection with the issuance by the Successor Agency to the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency, as successor to the former Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency (the “Successor Agency”), of its $__________ Successor Agency to the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency Taxable Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds, Series 2017B (the “Bonds”), pursuant to the provisions of section 34177.5 of the California Health and Safety Code and section 53580 et seq. of the California Government Code (collectively, the “Refunding Bond Law”), Resolution No. 2017/147 adopted by the Successor Agency on April 25, 2017, and an Indenture of Trust, dated as of __________ 1, 2017 (the “Indenture”), by and between the Successo r Agency and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee. In connection with this opinion, we have examined the law and such certified proceedings and other papers as we deem necessary to render this opinion. As to questions of fact material to our opinion, we have relied upon representations of the Successor Agency contained in the Indenture and in the certified proceedings and certifications of public officials and others furnished to us, without undertaking to verify the same by independent investigation. Based upon the foregoing we are of the opinion, under existing law, as follows: 1. The Successor Agency is duly created and validly existing as a public body, corporate and politic, with the power to enter into the Indenture, perform the agreements on its part contained therein and issue the Bonds. 2. The Indenture has been duly approved by the Successor Agency and constitutes a valid and binding obligation of the Successor Agency enforceable upon the Successor Agency in accordance with its terms. 3. Pursuant to the Refunding Bond Law, the Indenture creates a valid lien on the funds pledged by the Indenture for the security of the Bonds, on a parity with the pledge thereof for the security of the 2017A Bonds and any Parity Debt that may be issued pursuant to and as such capitalized terms are defined in the Indenture. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 470 F-4 4. The Bonds have been duly authorized, executed and delivered by the Successor Agency and are valid and binding special obligations of the Successor Agency, payable solely from the sources provided therefor in the Indenture. 5. The interest on the Bonds is exempt from personal income taxation imposed by the State of California. Ownership of the Bonds may result in other tax consequences to certain taxpayers, and we express no opinion regarding any such collateral consequences arising with respect to the Bonds. The rights of the owners of the Bonds and the enforceability of the Bonds and the Indenture may be subject to bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium and other similar laws affecting creditors‟ rights heretofore or hereafter enacted and also may be subject to the exercise of judicial discretion in accordance with general principles of equity. In rendering this opinion, we have relied upon certifications of the Successor Agency and others with respect to certain material facts. Our opinion represents our legal judgment based upon such review of the law and the facts that we deem relevant to render our opinion and is not a guarantee of a result. This opinion is given as of the date hereof and we assume no obligation to revise or supplement this opinion to reflect any facts or circumstances that may hereafter come to our attention or any changes in law that may hereafter occur. Respectfully submitted, June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 471 G-1 APPENDIX G DTC AND THE BOOK-ENTRY ONLY SYSTEM The information in this Appendix G concerning The Depository Trust Company, New York, New York (“DTC”) and DTC’s book-entry system has been obtained from DTC and the Successor Agency takes no responsibility for the completeness or accuracy thereof. The Successor Agency cannot and does not give any assurances that DTC, DTC Participants or Indirect Participants will distribute to the Beneficial Owners (a) payments of interest or principal with respect to the Series 2017 Bonds, (b) certificates representing ownership interest in or other confirmation or ownership interest in the Series 2017 Bonds, or (c) redemption or other notices sent to DTC or Cede & Co., its nominee, as the registered owner of the Series 2017 Bonds, or that they will so do on a timely basis, or that DTC, DTC Participants or DTC Indirect Participants will act in the manner described in this Appendix. The current “Rules” applicable to DTC are on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission and the current “Procedures” of DTC to be followed in dealing with DTC Participants are on file with DTC. The Depository Trust Company (“DTC”), New York, NY, will act as securities depository for the Series 2017 Bonds. The Series 2017 Bonds will be issued as fully-registered securities registered in the name of Cede & Co. (DTC‟s partnership nominee) or such other name as may be requested by an authorized representative of DTC. One fully-registered security certificate will be issued for the maturity and CUSIP number of the Series 2017 Bonds and will be deposited with DTC. DTC, the world‟s largest depository, is a limited-purpose trust company organized under the New York Banking Law, a “banking organization” within the meaning of the New York Banking Law, a member of the Federal Reserve System, a “clearing corporation” within the meaning of the New York Uniform Commercial Code, and a “clearing agency” registered pursuant to the provisions of Section 17A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. DTC holds and provides asset servicing for over 3.6 million issues of U.S. and non-U.S. equity issues, corporate and municipal debt issues, and money market instruments (from over 100 countries) that DTC‟s participants (“Direct Participants”) deposit with DTC. DTC also facilitates the post-trade settlement among Direct Participants of sales and other securities transactions in deposited securities, through electronic computerized book-entry transfers and pledges between Direct Participants‟ accounts. This eliminates the need for physical movement of securities certificates. Direct Participants include both U.S. and non-U.S. securities brokers and dealers, banks, trust companies, clearing corporations, and certain other organizations. DTC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (“DTCC”). DTCC is the holding company for DTC, National Securities Clearing Corporation and Fixed Income Clearing Corporation, all of which are registered clearing agencies. DTTC is owned by users of its regulated subsidiaries. Access to the DTC system is also available to others such as both U.S. and non-U.S. securities brokers and dealers, banks, trust companies, and clearing corporations that clear through or maintain a custodial relationship with a Direct Participant, either directly or indirectly (“Indirect Participants”). DTC has a Standard & Poor‟s rating of AA+. The DTC Rules applicable to its Participants are on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission. More information about DTC can be found at www.dtcc.com. Purchases of the Series 2017 Bonds under the DTC system must be made by or through Direct Participants, which will receive a credit for the Series 2017 Bonds on DTC‟s records. The ownership interest of each actual purchaser of each Refunding Bond (“Beneficial Owner”) is in turn to be recorded on the Direct and Indirect Participants‟ records. Beneficial Owners will not receive written confirmation from DTC of their purchase. Beneficial Owners are, however, expected to receive written confirmations providing details of the transaction, as well as periodic statements of their holdings, from the Direct or Indirect Participant through which the Beneficial Owner entered into the transaction. Transfers of June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 472 G-2 ownership interests in the Series 2017 Bonds are to be accomplished by entries made on the books of Direct and Indirect Participants acting on behalf of Beneficial Owners. Beneficial Owners will not receive certificates representing their ownership interests in the Series 2017 Bonds, except in the event that use of the book-entry system for the Series 2017 Bonds is discontinued. To facilitate subsequent transfers, all Bonds deposited by Direct Participants with DTC are registered in the name of DTC‟s partnership nominee, Cede & Co., or such other name as may be requested by an authorized representative of DTC. The deposit of the Series 2017 Bonds with DTC and their registration in the name of Cede & Co. or such other DTC nominee do not effect any change in beneficial ownership. DTC has no knowledge of the actual Beneficial Owners of the Series 2017 Bonds; DTC‟s records reflect only the identity of the Direct Participants to whose accounts such Bonds are credited, which may or may not be the Beneficial Owners. The Direct and Indirect Participants will remain responsible for keeping account of their holdings on behalf of their customers. Conveyance of notices and other communications by DTC to Direct Participants, by Direct Participants to Indirect Participants, and by Direct Participants and Indirect Participants to Beneficial Owners will be governed by arrangements among them, subject to any statutory or regulatory requirements as may be in effect from time to time. Beneficial Owners of the Series 2017 Bonds may wish to take certain steps to augment the transmission to them of notices of significant events with respect to the Series 2017 Bonds, such as redemptions, tenders, defaults, and proposed amendments to the Indenture. For example, Beneficial Owners of the Series 2017 Bonds may wish to ascertain that the nominee holding the Series 2017 Bonds for their benefit has agreed to obtain and transmit notices to Beneficial Owners. In the alternative, Beneficial Owners may wish to provide their names and addresses to the registrar and request that copies of notices be provided directly to them. Redemption notices shall be sent to DTC. If less than all of the Series 2017 Bonds within a maturity are being redeemed. DTC‟s practice is to determine by lot the amount of the interest of each Direct Participant in each issue to be redeemed. Neither DTC nor Cede & Co. (nor any other DTC nominee) will consent or vote with respect to the Series 2017 Bonds unless authorized by a Direct Participant in accordance with DTC‟s MMI Procedures. Under its usual procedures, DTC mails an Omnibus Proxy to the issuer as soon as possible after the record date. The Omnibus Proxy assigns Cede & Co.‟s consenting or voting rights to those Direct Participants to whose accounts the Series 2017 Bonds are credited on the record date (identified in a listing attached to the Omnibus Proxy). Redemption proceeds, distributions, and dividend payments on the Series 2017 Bonds will be made to Cede & Co., or such other nominee as may be requested by an authorized representative of DTC. DTC‟s practice is to credit Direct Participants‟ accounts upon DTC‟s receipt of funds and corresponding detail information from the Issuer or the Trustee, on payable date in accordance with their respective holdings shown on DTC‟s records. Payments by Participants to Beneficial Owners will be governed by standing instructions and customary practices, as is the case with securities held for the accounts of customers in bearer form or registered in “street name,” and will be the responsibility of such Participant and not of DTC, the Trustee or the Issuer, subject to any statutory or regulatory requirements as may be in effect from time to time. Payment of redemption proceeds, distributions and dividend payments (or such other nominee as may be requested by an authorized representative of DTC) is the responsibility of the Issuer or the Trustee, disbursement of such payments to Direct Participants will be the responsibility of DTC, and disbursement of such payments to the Beneficial Owners will be the responsibility of Direct and Indirect Participants. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 473 G-3 A Beneficial Owner shall give notice to elect to have its Securities purchased or tendered, through its Participant, to Remarketing Agent, and shall effect delivery of such Securities by causing the Direct Participant to transfer the Participant‟s interest in the Securities, on DTC‟s records, to Remarketing Agent. The requirement for physical delivery of Securities in connection with an optional tender or a mandatory purchase will be deemed satisfied when the ownership rights in the Securities are transferred by Direct Participants on DTC‟s records and followed by a book-entry credit of tendered Securities to Remarketing Agent‟s DTC account. DTC may discontinue providing its services as depository with respect to the Series 2017 Bonds at any time by giving reasonable notice to the Issuer or the Trustee. Under such circumstances, in the event that a successor depository is not obtained, Refunding Bond certificates are required to be printed and delivered. The Issuer may decide to discontinue use of the system of book-entry transfers through DTC (or a successor securities depository). In that event, Refunding Bond certificates will be printed and delivered. The information in this section concerning DTC and DTC‟s book-entry system has been obtained from sources that Issuer believes to be reliable, but Issuer takes no responsibility for the accuracy thereof. AS LONG AS A BOOK-ENTRY ONLY SYSTEM IS USED FOR THE SERIES 2017 BONDS, THE TRUSTEE WILL SEND ANY NOTICE OF REDEMPTION OR OTHER NOTICES TO HOLDERS ONLY TO DTC. ANY FAILURE OF DTC TO ADVISE ANY PARTICIPANT, OR OF ANY PARTICIPANT TO NOTIFY ANY BENEFICIAL OWNER, OF ANY NOTICE AND ITS CONTENT OR EFFECT WILL NOT AFFECT THE VALIDITY OR SUFFICIENCY OF THE PROCEEDINGS RELATING TO THE REDEMPTION OF THE SERIES 2017 BONDS CALLED FOR REDEMPTION OR OF ANY OTHER ACTION PREMISED ON SUCH NOTICE. NONE OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY, THE TRUSTEE, OR THE UNDERWRITER HAS ANY RESPONSIBILITY OR LIABILITY FOR ANY ASPECT OF THE RECORDS RELATING TO OR PAYMENTS MADE ON ACCOUNT OF BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP, OR FOR MAINTAINING, SUPERVISING OR REVIEWING ANY RECORDS RELATING TO BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF INTERESTS IN THE SERIES 2017 BONDS. NONE OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY, THE TRUSTEE, OR THE UNDERWRITER CAN GIVE AND DO NOT GIVE ANY ASSURANCES THAT DTC WILL DISTRIBUTE PAYMENTS TO DTC PARTICIPANTS OR THAT PARTICIPANTS OR OTHERS WILL DISTRIBUTE PAYMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE SERIES 2017 BONDS RECEIVED BY DTC OR ITS NOMINEES AS THE HOLDER THEREOF OR ANY REDEMPTION NOTICES OR OTHER NOTICES TO THE BENEFICIAL OWNERS, OR THAT THEY WILL DO SO ON A TIMELY BASIS, OR THAT DTC WILL SERVICE AND ACT IN THE MANNER DESCRIBED IN THIS OFFICIAL STATEMENT. SF\321979893.2 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 474 RECOMMENDATION(S): 1. OPEN the public hearing; RECEIVE and CONSIDER public comments and protests; CLOSE the public hearing. 2. ACCEPT the Fiscal Year 2017-18 Final Engineer's Report for Countywide Landscaping District AD 1979-3 (LL-2), 3. ADOPT Resolution No. 2017/203 confirming the diagram, assessment roll and assessments set forth in the Fiscal Year 2017-18 Final Engineer's Report for Countywide Landscaping District AD 1979-3 (LL-2), and 4. DIRECT the Auditor-Controller to place the levy of annual assessments on the tax roll for Fiscal Year 2017-18. FISCAL IMPACT: 100% Countywide Landscaping District AD 1979-3 (LL-2) funds. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Warren Lai, 925-313-2180 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: L. Strobel, County Administrator, R. Campbell, Auditor Controller, S. Anderson, County Counsel, G. Kramer, County Assessor, J. Francisco, Francisco&Associates, Inc., W. Lai, Engineering Services , V. Skerritt, Special Districts, J. Duffy, Special Districts, W. Quever, Finance D. 5 To:Board of Supervisors From:Julia R. Bueren, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:Hearing to levy assessments in Countywide Landscaping District AD 1979-3 (LL-2) Fiscal Year 2017-18. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 475 BACKGROUND: The existing Countywide Landscaping District AD 1979-3 (LL-2) contains thirty (30) Benefit Zones comprised of landscaping, pedestrian bridges, irrigation, park and recreational facilities and ancillary improvements installed by developers as a condition of their development. The annual assessment levies within these Benefit Zones will fund the operation, maintenance, and capital replacement of the facilities within each respective Benefit Zone. On March 28, 2017, the Board of Supervisors adopted the Resolution of Initiation (Resolution No. 2017/107) which directed the Engineer of Work to prepare the FY 2017/2018 Preliminary Engineer’s Report for the Countywide Landscaping District AD 1979-3 (LL-2). The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 requires that an Engineer’s Report be prepared each fiscal year to identify any changes in the improvements and assessments and to set the ensuing year’s special assessment rates. On May 9, 2017, the Board of Supervisors approved the Preliminary Engineer’s Report and adopted the Resolution of Intention (Resolution No. 2017/142) which; a) Declared the Board’s intention to levy and collect assessments within Countywide Landscaping District AD 1979-3 (LL-2) for FY 2017/2018; b) Generally described the improvements within Countywide Landscaping District AD 1979-3 (LL-2) for FY 2017/2018; c) Referred to the assessment district by its distinctive name and indicated the general location of the district; d) Referred to the Engineer’s Report, on file with the Clerk of the Board, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. e) Gave notice of the time, date and the place for hearing regarding the levy of the proposed assessments; and f) Stated the zones where the proposed assessments are to be increased from the previous year. Attached to this board order is a Final Engineer’s Report including Descriptions and the Fiscal Year 2017-18 Budgets (Exhibit A), the Fiscal Year 2017-18 Diagrams (Exhibit B) and the Fiscal Year 2017-18 Assessment Roll (Exhibit C), which represents any changes that may have been directed by the Board of Supervisors at the Board Meeting on May 9, 2017 where the LL-2 Preliminary Engineers report was accepted. The Fiscal Year 2017-18 assessments are based on information in the Final Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2017-18. Assessments are calculated by considering all anticipated expenditures for maintenance, utilities and administration. Any excess dollars from previous fiscal years are carried forward and the assessment amounts are adjusted accordingly. The assessment rates may change from fiscal year to fiscal year, dependent upon improvements to be constructed and maintenance to be performed; however the assessments cannot exceed the maximum amount set when the Benefit Zone was originally formed, plus an annual cost of living adjustment, if applicable. The proposed assessments being levied for each Benefit Zone for the Fiscal Year 2017-18 are either at, or below, the maximum assessment rates. The assessment amounts proposed, in accordance with the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, have been presented in the Preliminary and Final Engineer's Reports filed with the Board on May 9, 2017 and June 13, 2017, respectively, and the June 13, 2017 public hearing was publically noticed. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Without Board of Supervisors' approval there would be no acceptance of the Final Engineer's report and the assessment of levies for the Countywide Landscaping District AD 1979-3 (LL-2) for Fiscal Year 2017-18 would not be authorized on the tax roll, thus funds would not be available to maintain the landscaping and other improvements in the Benefit Zones throughout the Countywide Landscaping District AD 1979-3 (LL-2). CLERK'S ADDENDUM CLOSED the public hearing. ACCEPTED the Fiscal Year 2017-18 Final Engineer's Report for Countywide Landscaping District AD 1979-3 (LL-2), ADOPTED Resolution No. 2017/203 confirming the diagram, assessment roll and assessments set forth in the Fiscal Year 2017-18 Final Engineer's Report; and DIRECTED the Auditor-Controller to place the levy of annual assessments on the tax roll for Fiscal Year 2017-18. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 476 AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2017/203 Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution No. 2017/203 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 477 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 06/13/2017 by the following vote: AYE: John Gioia Candace Andersen Diane Burgis Karen Mitchoff Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2017/203 IN THE MATTER OF a HEARING to levy assessments in Countywide Landscaping District AD 1979-3 (LL-2) Fiscal Year 2017-18, Countywide (Countywide Landscaping District AD 1979-3 (LL-2) Funds) (All Districts) (Project Number 4500-6X5105). WHEREAS the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County FINDS THAT: 1. A Resolution of Initiation (No. 2017/107) was approved on March 28, 2017, pursuant to Chapter 3 of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, in which the Board of Supervisors designated the Public Works Director, or designee, as the Engineer of Work for the Countywide Landscaping District AD 1979-3 (LL-2) for Fiscal Year 2017-18, described any new improvements or any substantial changes in existing improvements, and ordered the Engineer of Work to prepare and file an Engineer's Report with the Clerk of the Board; and 2. Per Section 22623 of the California Streets and Highways Code, the Engineer of Work has filed with the Clerk of the Board, an Engineer’s Report for the Countywide Landscaping District AD 1979-3 (LL-2), including Benefit Zones 1,2,&4, 3, 5, 7, 10, 11, 17, 18, 19, 21, 22, 27, 35, 36, 37, 38, 42, 45, 48, 54, 57, 61, 63, 64, 68, 69, 70, 71, 74, and 75 for Fiscal Year 2017-18 which was subsequently approved by the Board of Supervisors; and 3. A Resolution of Intention (No. 2017/142) was approved by the Board of Supervisors on May 9, 2017, which among other things set the date of June 13, 2017 for a Public Hearing at 9:30 a.m. in the Chambers of the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County Administration Building, 651 Pine Street, Martinez, California; and 4. A Public Hearing was conducted on June 13, 2017, at 9:30 a.m. in the Chambers of the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County Administration Building, 651 Pine Street, Martinez, California, any interested person was given an opportunity to protest the assessments and the Final Engineer’s Report for the Countywide Landscaping District AD 1979-3 (LL-2), either in writing or orally, and it was determined that a majority protest had not been filed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors: 1. Orders the improvements for the Countywide Landscaping District AD 1979-3 (LL-2) for Fiscal Year 2017-18; and 2. Confirms the diagram and assessments as shown in the Final Engineer's Report for the Countywide Landscaping District AD 1979-3 (LL-2) for Fiscal Year 2017-18; and 3. Authorizes the levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 2017-18 for the Countywide Landscaping District AD 1979-3 (LL-2). Contact: Warren Lai, 925-313-2180 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: L. Strobel, County Administrator, R. Campbell, Auditor Controller, S. Anderson, County Counsel, G. Kramer, County Assessor, J. Francisco, 5 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 478 cc: L. Strobel, County Administrator, R. Campbell, Auditor Controller, S. Anderson, County Counsel, G. Kramer, County Assessor, J. Francisco, Francisco&Associates, Inc., W. Lai, Engineering Services , V. Skerritt, Special Districts, J. Duffy, Special Districts, W. Quever, Finance June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 479 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 480 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CONSOLIDATED REPORT FOR THE COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING district (ll-2) Prepared by: Francisco & Associates, Inc. 130 Market Place, Suite 160 San Ramon, CA 94583 (925) 867-3400 Fiscal Year 2017-18 Final Engineer’s Report June 13, 2017 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 481 Contra Costa County Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY2017-18 TABLE OF CONTENTS ccc1718_FER.docx - i - Francisco & Associates, Inc. Page No. Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors and County Staff .................................................. ii Certificates ............................................................................................................................................. iii SECTION I – Introduction ................................................................................................................. 1 Table 1 – Benefit Zones modified since FY2016-17............................................... 2 SECTION II – Engineer’s Report ....................................................................................................... 3 PART A – Plans and Specifications...................................................................................... 5 PART B – Estimate of Cost .................................................................................................. 13 Table 2 –FY2017-18 Summary .......................................................................... 14 PART C – Assessment District Diagram .......................................................................... 16 PART D – Method of Apportionment of Assessment ................................................... 18 Special vs. General Benefit .............................................................................. 19 PART E – Property List & Assessment Roll .................................................................. 36 APPENDICES APPENDIX A – Detailed Project Cost Breakdown APPENDIX B – Assessment Diagrams APPENDIX C – FY2017-18 Assessment Roll June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 482 Contra Costa County Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY2017-18 BOARD & COUNTY STAFF ccc1718_FER.docx - ii - Francisco & Associates, Inc. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT (LL-2) (ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 1979-3) FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY STAFF Federal D. Glover Chair District V Supervisor Karen Mitchoff John M. Gioia Vice Chair District I Supervisor District IV Supervisor Candace Andersen Diane Burgis District II Supervisor District III Supervisor COUNTY STAFF Julia R. Bueren Public Works Director Sharon L. Anderson David J. Twa County Counsel Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Warren Lai Assistant Public Works Director Francisco & Associates Assessment Engineer June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 483 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 484 Contra Costa County SECTION I Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY2017-18 INTRODUCTION ccc1718_FER.docx - 1 - Francisco & Associates, Inc. SECTION I INTRODUCTION ENGINEER'S REPORT CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT (LL-2) FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 To ensure the proper flow of funds for the ongoing operation, maintenance and servicing of specific improvements within the boundaries of Contra Costa County, the Board of Supervisors, through the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, approved the formation of Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) or “District”. Improvements that may be constructed, operated, maintained and serviced by the District include: Landscaping, irrigation, lighting (not street lighting, except in special cases), park and recreational facilities, including but not limited to lights, playground equipment, play courts, public restrooms, and associated appurtenant facilities. Generally developers, as a part of their conditions permitting the developer to construct new housing or commercial/industrial developments, construct these aforementioned public improvements. However, the ongoing operation and maintenance of these various improvements are financed through the District. The District is composed of “Benefit Zones” to ensure that the operation and maintenance of the improvements are specifically paid for by those property owners who directly benefit from the improvements. As required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, the annual Engineer's Report must be reviewed by the Board of Supervisors each year and includes: (1) a description by Benefit Zone of the improvements to be operated, maintained and serviced by the District, (2) an estimated budget by Benefit Zone for the District, and (3) a listing of the proposed assessments to be levied upon each assessable lot or parcel within the District. The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors will hold a Public Hearing, June 13, 2017, on the District to provide an opportunity for any interested person to be heard. At the conclusion of the Public Hearing, the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors may adopt a resolution confirming the levy of assessments as originally proposed or modified. Following the adoption of this resolution, the final Assessor’s roll will be prepared and filed with the County Auditor’s office to be included on the Fiscal Year 2017-18 tax roll. Payment of the assessment for each parcel will be made in the same manner and at the same time as payments are made for property taxes. All funds collected through the assessment must be placed in a special fund and can only be used for the purposes stated within this report. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 485 Contra Costa County SECTION I Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY2017-18 INTRODUCTION ccc1718_FER.docx - 2 - Francisco & Associates, Inc. In addition to the existing Benefit Zones, new Benefit Zones are created throughout the Fiscal Year as development is processed. Table 1 below indicates those Benefit Zones that have been annexed into the District or modified since the prior year’s annual report was prepared in Fiscal Year 2016-17. Table 1 – Benefit Zones modified since FY2016-17 Benefit Zone Comment Zone 27 Since the zone boundaries are now consistent with property lines, irrigation system modifications to separate the County irrigation system from the HOA system is necessary. Future years’ assessments will replenish funds in this zone for the cost of the irrigation system modifications, and then be adjusted to reflect the cost to maintain the County landscape improvements. Benefit Zones with Proposed Assessment Increases for FY 2017-18 Benefit Zones No. 5, 35, 54 and 71 have been increased 3.44% over the FY 2016-17 rate. These benefit zones can be increased each fiscal year by the annual change in the Consumer Price Index for the San Francisco Bay Area – All Urban Customers (CPI). For Fiscal Year 2017-18 the CPI increased from 262.60 to 271.63 which equals an increase of 3.44%. In addition, Benefit Zone No. 61 was increased from $125/EDU to $150/EDU with a maximum assessment rate of $190/EDU and Benefit Zone No. 70 was increased from $140/EDU to $175/EDU with a maximum assessment rate of $425.28/EDU. These assessment increases were necessary to cover expected operation and maintenance costs for FY 2017-18. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 486 Contra Costa County SECTION II Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY2017-18 ENGINEER'S REPORT ccc1718_FER.docx - 3 - Francisco & Associates, Inc. SECTION II ENGINEER'S REPORT PREPARED PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 SECTIONS 22500 THROUGH 22679 OF THE CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT (LL-2) FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 Pursuant to Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, and in accordance with the Resolution of Intention, being Resolution No. 2017/142, adopted May 9, 2017 and the Resolution of Initiation, being Resolution No. 2017/107 adopted March 28, 2017, by the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California, in connection with the proceedings for: CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT (LL-2) Herein after referred to as the "Assessment District", I, Warren Lai, P.E., the duly appointed ENGINEER OF WORK, submits herewith the "Report" consisting of five (5) parts as follows: PART A: PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS This part describes the improvements to be maintained within the District. Plans and specifications for the improvements are on file in the Public Works Department. PART B: ESTIMATE OF COST This part contains an estimate of the cost of the administration, maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements in each Benefit Zone as described in Part A (Plans and Specifications). This part includes the proposed expenses for Fiscal Year 2016-17 in addition to the proposed budget for Fiscal Year 2017-18 for each of the Benefit Zones. The detailed budget information is on file in the Public Works Department. PART C: ASSESSMENT DISTRICT DIAGRAM This part incorporates by reference a diagram of the District showing the exterior boundaries of the District, the boundaries of any Benefit Zones within the District and the lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land within the District. The diagram has been prepared by County staff and submitted to the Contra Costa County Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Contra Costa County Assessor for the year when this Report was prepared. The Assessor's maps and records are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Report. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 487 Contra Costa County SECTION II Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY2017-18 ENGINEER'S REPORT ccc1718_FER.docx - 4 - Francisco & Associates, Inc. PART D: METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENT This part contains the method of apportionment of assessments, based upon parcel classification of land within the District, in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received. PART E: PROPERTY LIST & ASSESSMENT ROLL This part contains a list of the parcels and proposed assessment amount on each benefited lot or parcel of land within the District. The list is keyed to the records of the Contra Costa County Assessor, which are incorporated herein by reference and is filed in the Office of the Contra Costa County Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 488 Contra Costa County SECTION III Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY2017-18 PART A ccc1718_FER.docx - 5 - Francisco & Associates, Inc. PART A PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The facilities, which have been constructed within each of the Benefit Zones within the District, and those which may be subsequently constructed, will be operated, maintained and serviced as generally described as follows: DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT (LL-2) FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 The improvements consist of the construction, operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping, irrigation, lighting (not street lighting except in special cases), park and recreational facilities, and appurtenant facilities including but not limited to; personnel, electrical energy, utilities such as water, materials, contractual services, and other items necessary for the satisfactory operation of these services and facilities as described below: Landscaping The landscaping facilities consist of, but are not limited to: Landscaping, planting, shrubbery, trees, irrigation systems, hardscapes, sidewalks, trails, lighting and appurtenant facilities including, but not limited to playground equipment, play courts, and public restrooms, located within the public right-of-ways, parkways, parks, County building grounds, and designated easements within the boundaries of the District. Park and Recreation Facilities The operation and maintenance of park and recreational facilities includes, but is not limited to lights, playground equipment, play courts, community center buildings, and public restrooms and associated appurtenant facilities located within the boundaries of the District. On the following pages is a detailed description of the improvements that are being operated, maintained and serviced throughout each Benefit Zone within the District. In addition, Appendix B (Assessment Diagrams), provides a detailed diagram of each Benefit Zone’s improvements. The number indicating the improvements listed in each Benefit Zone on the following pages corresponds to the numbers on each Assessment Diagram in Appendix B. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 489 Contra Costa County SECTION III Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY2017-18 PART A ccc1718_FER.docx - 6 - Francisco & Associates, Inc.  Zones 1, 2, & 4 (Lynbrook Development - Bay Point Area) Landscaping, irrigation, recreational facilities and related improvements located along the following roadways and within the following parks: 1. Port Chicago Highway (approximately 1,600 linear feet); 2. Kevin Drive (approximately 3,600 linear feet on the north side and approximately 2,600 linear feet on the south side); 3. Lynbrook Street (approximately 1,050 linear feet on the north side and approximately 850 linear feet on the south side); 4. Willow Pass Road (approximately 900 linear feet); and 5. Lynbrook Park *(4.13 acres within the Lynbrook development) includes all playground equipment, ambient lighting and related improvements. Location: Kevin Drive & Port Chicago Highway. *Please note: Ambrose Recreation & Park District is responsible for the maintenance of Lynbrook Park as per the June 26, 2012 Joint Power of Agreement (JEPA) between the County and Ambrose.  Zone 3 (Hickory Meadows - Bay Point Area) Landscaping, irrigation, recreational facilities and related improvements located along the following roadways and within the following parks: 1. Hickory Meadows Park *(0.37 acres) located at the intersection of Winterbrook Drive and Summerfield Drive. *Please note: Ambrose Recreation & Park District is responsible for the maintenance of Hickory Meadows Park as per the June 26, 2012 Joint Power of Agreement (JEPA) between the County and Ambrose.  Zone 5 (Pacheco Beautification Project – Pacheco Area) Landscaping, irrigation, recreational facilities and related improvements located along the following roadways and within the following parks: 1. Pacheco Boulevard median island improvements that were installed as part of the Beautification Project (between Center Avenue and Second Street); and 2. Pacheco Creekside Park trail (1.61 acres).  Zone 7 (Pleasant Hill/BART – Contra Costa Centre Area) Landscaping, irrigation and related improvements located within: 1. Various median islands within Las Juntas Way, Coggins Road, Jones Road, Wayne Drive, Treat Boulevard, Oak Road, and both sides and underneath the pedestrian bridge along Jones Road; 2. Fox Creek Park (0.50 acres); and 3. The Walden Green I area is adjacent and maintained through another funding source. Fund will be reduced in 2018-19. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 490 Contra Costa County SECTION III Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY2017-18 PART A ccc1718_FER.docx - 7 - Francisco & Associates, Inc.  Zone 10 (Viewpointe - Bay Point Area) Landscaping, irrigation, and related improvements located within: 1. Open Space - Slope easement areas (up to 10 feet); 2. Paved walking trails (located on Pomo Street and the slope behind Sky Harbor Avenue); 3. Viewpointe Park *(a.k.a. Lehman Park – 0.08 acres). Location: Pomo Street and Sea Cliff Place; 4. Landscaping at the end of Skyharbor and Waterview cul-de-sacs; and 5. Frontage landscaping on the north side of Evora Road. *Please note: Ambrose Recreation & Park District is responsible for the maintenance of Viewpointe Park as per the June 26, 2012 Joint Power of Agreement (JEPA) between the County and Ambrose.  Zone 11 (Hilltop Commons - San Pablo Area) Landscaping, irrigation and related improvements located within: 1. Approximately 2,040 square feet of landscaping along the southeast side frontage along San Pablo Avenue between Kay Road and Crestwood Drive located between the sidewalk and the fence; and 2. Median along San Pablo Avenue between Kay Road and Crestwood Drive.  Zone 17 (Shadow Creek – Danville Area) Landscaping, irrigation and related improvements located along: 1. Camino Tassajara on the north side, adjacent to the sidewalk areas, and the entry post areas located at Shadow Creek Drive and Knollview Drive.  Zone 18 (Pacheco Manor – Pacheco Area) Landscaping, irrigation and related improvements located along: 1. The frontage next to Pacheco Manor soundwall along Pacheco Boulevard; and 2. The frontage next to Pacheco Manor fence along the east side of Temple Drive.  Zone 19 (Hidden Pond – Reliez Valley/Martinez Area) Landscaping, irrigation and related improvements located along the following roadways: 1. The frontage of Reliez Valley Road, (approximately 1,500 linear feet); and 2. The frontage of Hidden Pond Road, (approximately 1,000 linear feet).  Zone 21 (Kensington - Kensington Area) Landscaping, irrigation and related improvements located within: 1. The five (5) roadway medians along Arlington Avenue; 2. The Colusa Traffic Circle; 3. The Kensington Sign area; and 4. The frontage landscape on both sides of Arlington Avenue between Ardmore Road and Amhearst Avenue. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 491 Contra Costa County SECTION III Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY2017-18 PART A ccc1718_FER.docx - 8 - Francisco & Associates, Inc.  Zone 22 (Seabreeze – Bay Point Area) Landscaping, irrigation and related improvements located along: 1. Landscaping frontage on the north side of Evora Road and median along Saint Tropez; 2. Open Space along the perimeter of Seabreeze subdivision and Subdivision 8330; 3. Open space on perimeter of Parcel A; 4. Landscaping at the ends of Beaulieu Court and Beaulieu Place; 5. Landscaping at Rapallo Lane at Savona Way entry area; and 6. Landscaping along south side of Savona Way.  Zone 27 (Bettencourt Ranch and Somerset– Danville Area) Landscaping, irrigation and related improvements located along the Camino Tassajara frontage of Bettencourt Ranch and Somerset Subdivisions: 1. Planting strips along Camino Tassajara between the curb and sidewalk (the slopes north of Camino Tassajara Road in this area are the property of the Bettencourt HOA and the responsibility of the Bettencourt HOA); 2. Medians along Camino Tassajara between Buckingham Drive and Mansfield Drive. In Fiscal Year 2004-05, Zone 27A was created at a lower rate for those homeowners in Tract 7763 – due to the fact they are on a private street and have a reduced level of landscaping.  Zone 35 (Sandy Cove Shopping Center – Discovery Bay Area) Landscaping, irrigation, pedestrian trail and related improvements located within the public right of way and trail easements; 1. Three (3) Bixler Road median islands adjacent to Sandy Cove Shopping Center; and 2. A pedestrian trail between the Sandy Cove Shopping Center and Newport Drive including two (2) footbridges and necessary appurtenances.  Zone 36 (Alamo Beautification - Alamo Area) Landscaping, irrigation, recreational facilities and related improvements along/within Danville Boulevard, Livorna Road, Miranda Avenue and Stone Valley Road. This includes: 1. Median islands at the intersection of Stone Valley Road and Green Valley Road; 2. Trees related to the “Danville Boulevard of Trees” projects; 3. Stone Valley Road landscaping. Phase I – North side of Stone Valley Road from Stone Valley Way to Austin Lane. South side from Alamo Ranch Road, approximately 280 linear feet East and South side from High Eagle Road, approximately 760 linear feet West; Phase II – Full responsibility for areas between Austin Lane and St. Paul Drive, excluding the Phase I area described above; 4. Additional litter pickup and sidewalk and jogging path cleanup along Danville Boulevard, Livorna Road, Miranda Avenue and Stone Valley Road. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 492 Contra Costa County SECTION III Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY2017-18 PART A ccc1718_FER.docx - 9 - Francisco & Associates, Inc.  Zone 37 (Clyde - Clyde Area) Landscaping, irrigation, recreational facilities and related improvements within: 1. Clyde Park (2.0 acres, located on Norman Avenue); 2. Marie Porter Park (0.22 acres, located on Kilburn Street and Norman Avenue); 3. Big Oak Tree Park (.25 acres, located on Kilburn Street at the intersection of Wellington Avenue); and 4. Maybeck Park (0.07 acres, located on Medburn Street and Amy Lane).  Zone 38 (Rodeo - Rodeo Area) Landscaping, irrigation, recreational facilities and related improvements including trails and picnic facilities located along: 1. The approximately 11-acre Lefty Gomez Ballfield Complex (located at 470 Parker Avenue); 2. Maintenance of the “Rodeo” signboard area (up to the Hercules city limit); 3. Parker Avenue trees along the west and east side frontage from First Street south to Sixth Street; 4. The 3-mile long Rodeo Creek Trail Corridor (from Investment Street south to the footbridge at Mariners Point and Seacliff Court); and 5. Pedestrian footbridge and adjacent lot located at Highway 80 and Willow Avenue.  Zone 42 (California Skyline - Bay Point Area) Landscaping, irrigation, recreational facilities and related improvements located within the public right-of-way along: 1. The frontage along the north side of Evora Road; 2. Boeger Park* (0.57 acres, located on Caskey Street); 3. The public paths located between lots 40/41, 28/46, 1/Evora Road and 27/Evora Road of Subdivision 7838; 4. Both sides of Driftwood Drive from Jill to Coastview and within the median islands; 5. Tradewinds Park* (0.72 acres, located at Tradewinds Court), including the landscape area on the northeast and southwest corner of Coastview and Tradewinds Court. *Please Note: Ambrose Recreation & Park District is responsible for the maintenance of Boeger & Tradewinds Park as per the June 26, 2012 Joint Power of Agreement (JEPA) between the County and Ambrose.  Zone 45 (Alamo Villas – Alamo Area) Landscaping, irrigation and related improvements located within the public right-of-way along: 1. The median island, approximately 120 linear feet along Danville Boulevard by Tract 7559.  Zone 48 (Mrack Road – Danville Area) Landscaping, irrigation and related improvements within the public right-of-way along: 1. Oakgate Drive; and 2. The north side frontage of Camino Tassajara from 600’ west of Oak Gate Drive to Hansen Lane (approximately 725 linear feet). June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 493 Contra Costa County SECTION III Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY2017-18 PART A ccc1718_FER.docx - 10 - Francisco & Associates, Inc.  Zone 54 (Alamo Country – Alamo Area) Landscaping, irrigation and related improvements located within the public right-of-way along: 1. Livorna Road and Miranda Avenue, fronting Subdivisions 7601 and 7818, totaling approximately 4,320 linear feet. Landscaping varies in width from 23 feet to 170 feet; and 2. A financial contribution of approximately $871 (93 units * $9.36) for the Zone 36 medians.  Zone 57 (Pacific Waterways – Discovery Bay Area) Landscaping, irrigation, recreational facilities and related improvements within the public right-of-way, landscape and pedestrian pathway easements, parking bay parcels, and a park parcel: 1. Regatta Park (4.83 acres, AKA Tyler Memorial Park, located on Sailboat Drive); 2. Public right-of-way along Highway 4 and Bixler Road, fronting Subdivisions 7679, 7907, 7908, 7909 and 7881, totaling approximately 3,680 linear feet; 3. Porthole Drive medians and frontage on both sides of approximately 340 linear feet each (totaling 1,020 linear feet); 4. Entry area at Bixler Road and Regatta Drive; 5. Parking bays and associated landscape; and 6. A short pedestrian path connecting Yacht Drive to Bixler Road.  Zone 61 (Discovery Bay West – Discovery Bay Area) Landscaping, irrigation, recreational facilities and related improvements along the following roadways and within the following parks: 1. The public right-of-way frontage and medians along Newport Drive from Bixler Road to Newport Lane; 2. The public right-of-way frontage and medians along all of Preston Drive; 3. Frontage along both sides of Point of Timber Road adjacent to the Discovery Bay West development; 4. Slifer Park (5.83 acres); 5. Landscaping associated with the Park-n-Ride Lot located at Bixler Road; and 6. Frontages along Bixler Road Village I, Bixler Road Village II, Bixler Road Village III and Bixler Road Village IV.  Zone 63 (Parkway Estates - North Richmond Area) Landscaping, irrigation and related improvements within: 1. Parkway Estates Park (0.32 acres, located on Malcom Drive).  Zone 64 (California Reflections – Pinole Area) Landscaping, irrigation and related improvements consisting of approximately 231 linear feet located within: 1. The public right-of-way fronting San Pablo Avenue; and 2. The public right-of-way fronting Eire Drive. The landscape improvements vary in width from 15 feet to 30 feet. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 494 Contra Costa County SECTION III Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY2017-18 PART A ccc1718_FER.docx - 11 - Francisco & Associates, Inc.  Zone 68 (Wendt Ranch* – Danville Area) Landscaping, irrigation and related improvements located within the public right-of-way and medians along: 1. Camino Tassajara median islands and frontage along the subdivision; and 2. Creekview Drive entry area, including the median island. The Creekview Drive and other parkway strips are specifically excluded. *Please Note: There are parks and landscaping located in the interior sections of this Zone which are owned and maintained by a Homeowners Association and therefore the maximum assessment rate did not include these interior areas of maintenance and they are not the responsibility of the District.  Zone 69 (Alamo Creek* – Danville Area) Landscaping, irrigation and related improvements located within the public right-of-way and medians along: 1. Camino Tassajara median from Knolls Creek Road east to soccer field entrance; 2. Camino Tassajara south side frontage from Knolls Creek Road east to soccer field entrance; 3. Charbray median and park strips from Camino Tassajara south to the trailhead (including bio filtration strips); 4. Massara median and park strips from Charbray to Drysdale; and 5. Casablanca park strips from Knolls Creek south to Charbray. *Please Note: There are parks and landscaping located in the interior sections of this Zone, which are currently owned and maintained by a Homeowners Association. However, the maximum assessment rate, when established, included these interior areas as being maintained and operated by the District. Therefore, if the Homeowner’s Association fails to maintain these interior sections to County standards, the County may take over maintenance of these areas and increase the assessment to its maximum allowable rate.  Zone 70 (Intervening Properties – Danville Area) Landscaping, irrigation and related improvements located within the public right-of-way and medians along: 1. South side frontage from Hansen Lane east to the limits of the development; 2. Monterosso west and east side street frontages & medians from Camino Tassajara south to Casablanca Street; 3. Casablanca street frontage from Menton Street east to the Alamo Creek Tributary Bridge; 4. Entry monument on Camino Tassajara & Monterosso Street; and 5. Camino Tassajara median islands from Hansen Lane to Knollview Drive. *Please Note: There are parks and landscaping located in the interior sections of this Zone which are owned and maintained by a Homeowners Association and therefore the maximum assessment rate did not include these interior areas of maintenance and they are not the responsibility of the District. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 495 Contra Costa County SECTION III Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY2017-18 PART A ccc1718_FER.docx - 12 - Francisco & Associates, Inc.  Zone 71 (Diablo Vista Ballfields* – Danville Area) 1. 15 Acre Diablo Vista Ballfield. *Please Note: Per the December 15, 2009 Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement between the Town of Danville, San Ramon Valley Unified School District (SRVUSD) and Contra Costa County, SRVUSD is responsible for enhanced maintenance of this area.  Zone 74 (Bella Flora* – Richmond Area) Landscaping, irrigation and related improvements located within the public right-of-way along: 1. Martin Drive, east side frontage; 2. Ellison Lane, south side frontage; 3. Spears Circle Park (0.50 acres, located at intersection of Malcolm Drive and Spears Circle); 4. Landscaping along the south side of Pittsburg Avenue (to be constructed in the future); 5. A portion of the Pittsburg Avenue median islands (to be constructed in the future); and 6. Landscaping along the east side of Richmond Parkway; and pedestrian trails (to be constructed in the future). *Please Note: There are parks and landscaping located in the interior of Subdivision 9293 which are planned to be owned and maintained by a Homeowners Association and therefore the maximum assessment rate did not include these interior areas of maintenance and they are not the responsibility of the District.  Zone 75 (Belmont Terrace* – Pacheco Area) Landscaping, irrigation and related improvements located within the public right-of-way along: 1. Pacheco Boulevard frontage from Falling Star Drive to Little Valley Road; and 2. North side of Pacheco Boulevard frontage fronting Subdivision 8967. *Please Note: There are parks and landscaping located in the interior of Subdivisions 8967 and 8984 which are owned and maintained by a Homeowners Association and therefore the maximum assessment rate did not include these interior areas of maintenance and they are not the responsibility of the District. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 496 Contra Costa County SECTION III Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY2017-18 PART B ccc1718_FER.docx - 13 - Francisco & Associates, Inc. PART B ESTIMATE OF COST The 1972 Act provides that the total cost of construction, operation, maintenance and servicing of the public landscaping, irrigation, lighting (not street lighting except in special cases) and park facilities can be recovered by the District. Incidental expenses including administration of the District, engineering fees, legal fees and all other costs associated with the construction, operation and maintenance and servicing of the District can also be included. Four (4) Benefit Zones will have negative fund balances at the end of Fiscal Year 2017-18. In an effort to reduce the negative balances each year, there may be a temporary reduction of services in those areas of the County. Eventually these Zone balances will not be negative and will begin to build reserves for incidental costs and improvements within the Benefit Zone. The estimated Fiscal Year 2017-18 expenditures and assessment revenue for the proposed District facilities have been provided by the County and are summarized on the following page: June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 497 Contra Costa County SECTION III Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY2017-18 PART B ccc1718_FER.docx - 14 - Francisco & Associates, Inc. Legend: PWGM = Public Works Grounds Maintenance HOA = Homeowners Association SRVUSD = San Ramon Valley Unified School District Ambrose = Ambrose Recreation & Park District Discovery Bay CSD = Discovery Bay Community Services District A detailed “Special Districts Worksheet” for each Benefit Zone is shown in Appendix “A” of this Report. The worksheets provide actual revenues and estimated expenditure details for Fiscal Year 2016-17 and proposed revenue and expenditure details for Fiscal Year 2017-18. Public playground safety and accessibility standards are mandated by two legal requirements. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 became effective in 1992 and required all public facilities (including playgrounds) be free of architectural barriers to access by January 1, 1995. Secondly, California Playground Safety Regulations R-39-97, mandated compliance with federal playground safety standards by the year 2000. This law requires that all playground equipment areas accessible to the public be audited/inspected for safety. These standards are established by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) in their document "Standard Consumer Safety Performance Specification for Playground Equipment for Public Use", and by the federal Consumer Products Safety Commission (CPSC) in their document "Public Playground Handbook for Safety". Landscape and lighting zones that have existing Table 2: FY2017-18 Summary Zone Zone Description Number of Parcels Total Expenditures Capital Projects Operating Reserves Expenditures (w/out Capital or Operating Reserves) Proposed Assessment Revenue Maintained By 1, 2, 4 Lynbrook Development 685 ($54,213.20) $0.00 $0.00 ($54,213.20) $61,365.92 PWGM/Ambrose 3 Hickory Meadows 78 ($29,693.17) ($17,136.02) ($7,023.12) ($5,534.03) $14,046.24 Ambrose 5 Pacheco Beautification 907 ($147,404.70) ($71,018.60) ($28,365.15) ($48,020.95) $56,730.30 PWGM 7 Pleasant Hill BART 250 ($151,157.48) ($7,121.09) ($25,784.19) ($118,252.20) $81,433.62 Contra Costa Centre 10 Viewpointe 119 ($16,918.71) $0.00 $0.00 ($16,918.71) $18,071.34 PWGM/Ambrose 11 Hilltop Commons 1 ($21,149.90) $0.00 ($3,000.00) ($18,149.90) $6,000.00 PWGM 17 Shadow Creek 477 ($155,882.42) ($27,054.54) ($35,775.00) ($93,052.88) $71,550.00 PWGM 18 Pacheco Manor 22 ($5,483.69) ($1,004.14) ($1,935.34) ($2,544.21) $3,870.68 PWGM 19 Hidden Pond 130 ($54,855.51) ($17,387.77) ($13,000.00) ($24,467.74) $26,000.00 PWGM 21 Kensington Area 2,256 ($41,309.69) $0.00 ($12,543.63) ($28,766.06) $30,655.40 PWGM 22 Seabreeze 154 ($46,289.61) $0.00 ($6,337.33) ($39,952.28) $44,660.00 PWGM 27 Bettencourt Ranch & Somerset 571 ($168,693.81) $0.00 $0.00 ($168,693.81) $79,002.00 PWGM 35 Sandy Cove Shopping Center 9 ($264,913.21) ($227,229.22) ($13,721.34) ($23,962.65) $27,442.68 Discovery Bay CSD 36 Alamo Beautification 5,498 ($82,433.39) ($17,905.88) ($16,921.68) ($47,605.83) $50,377.84 PWGM 37 Clyde Area 286 ($18,378.87) ($2,539.31) ($5,816.96) ($10,022.60) $11,633.92 PWGM 38 Rodeo Area 2,556 ($94,637.46) $0.00 ($10,079.60) ($84,557.86) $84,414.82 Contractor 42 California Skyline 343 ($117,459.49) $0.00 ($30,769.25) ($86,690.24) $72,030.00 PWGM/Ambrose 45 Alamo Villas 10 ($882.41) $0.00 $0.00 ($882.41) $1,200.00 PWGM 48 Mrack Road 72 ($66,484.48) ($15,222.20) ($17,640.00) ($33,622.28) $35,280.00 PWGM 54 Alamo Country 93 ($67,841.07) ($10,717.47) ($20,906.74) ($36,216.86) $35,955.66 PWGM 57 Pacific Waterways 380 ($93,994.26) $0.00 ($10,443.75) ($83,550.51) $87,780.00 Discovery Bay CSD 61 Discovery Bay West 1,924 ($377,386.25) ($48,231.68) ($107,343.75) ($221,810.82) $264,825.00 Discovery Bay CSD 63 Parkway Estates 87 ($74,577.83) ($46,837.45) ($10,005.00) ($17,735.38) $20,010.00 PWGM 64 California Reflections 31 ($67,981.25) ($54,677.05) ($3,875.00) ($9,429.20) $7,750.00 PWGM 68 Wendt Ranch 125 ($12,433.86) $0.00 ($312.50) ($12,121.36) $625.00 HOA 69 Alamo Creek 810 ($54,498.63) $0.00 ($1,890.80) ($52,607.83) $3,781.60 HOA 70 Intervening Properties 379 ($121,109.63) ($36,532.10) ($29,820.00) ($54,757.53) $74,550.00 PWGM 71 Diablo Vista Ballfields 1,059 ($117,372.31) $0.00 ($5,387.76) ($111,984.55) $112,266.80 SRVUSD 74 Bella Flora 176 ($288,657.24) ($210,512.95) ($30,260.00) ($47,884.29) $60,520.00 PWGM 75 Belmont Terrace 219 ($8,144.84)$0.00 ($354.72)($7,790.12)$821.58 HOA 19,707 ($2,822,238.37) ($811,127.47) ($449,312.61) ($1,561,798.29) $1,444,650.40 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 498 Contra Costa County SECTION III Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY2017-18 PART B ccc1718_FER.docx - 15 - Francisco & Associates, Inc. playground equipment that does not meet these federal and state guidelines must either retrofit or replace that equipment. The 1972 Act requires that a special fund be set up for the revenues and expenditures of each Benefit Zone. Funds raised by the assessments shall only be used for the purpose as stated herein. A contribution to each Benefit Zone by Contra Costa County may be made to reduce the assessments, as the Board of Supervisors deems appropriate. Any balance remaining on July 1 at the end of the fiscal year must be carried over to the next fiscal year. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 499 Contra Costa County SECTION III Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY2017-18 PART C ccc1718_FER.docx - 16 - Francisco & Associates, Inc. PART C ASSESSMENT DISTRICT DIAGRAM The boundaries of the Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) are completely within the boundaries of Contra Costa County. The Assessment Diagram for the Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) is on file in the Office of the Contra Costa County Clerk of the Board of Supervisors and the Contra Costa County Public Works Department. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Contra Costa County Assessor, for the year when this Report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Report as shown in Appendix “B”. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 500 Assessment District 1979-3 (LL-2)Contra Costa County Zone 38 Zone 64Zone 11 Zone 74Zone 63 Zone 21 Zone 37 Zone 42 Zone 22Zone 18 Zone 5 Zone 19 Zone 7 Zone 54 Zone 36 Zone 27 Zone 17 Zone 71Zone 70Zone 48 Zone 69Zone 68 Zone 1,2 & 4Zone 3 Zone 10 Zone 61 Zone 35Zone 57 Zone 75 N:\Contra\FY16-17\LL-2\Diagrams\Zones_overview.pdf (Last Update 2016-04-08 SA) Zone 45 ZONE DESCRIPTION 1, 2, & 43571011171819212227353637384245485457616364686970717475 Lynbrook Development, Bay Point AreaHickory Meadows, Bay Point AreaPacheco Beautification, Pacheco AreaPleasant Hill/BART, Contra Costa Centre AreaViewpointe, Bay Point AreaHilltop Commons, San Pablo AreaShadow Creek, Danville AreaPacheco Manor, Pacheco AreaHidden Pond, Reliez Valley/Martinez AreaKensington, Kensington AreaSeabreeze, Bay Point AreaBettencourt Ranch and Somerset, Danville AreaSandy Cove Shopping Center, Discovery Bay AreaAlamo Beautification, Alamo AreaClyde, Clyde AreaRodeo, Rodeo AreaCalifornia Skyline, Bay Point AreaAlamo Villas, Alamo AreaMrack Road, Danville AreaAlamo Country, Alamo AreaPacific Waterways, Discovery Bay AreaDiscovery Bay West, Discovery Bay AreaParkway Estates, North Richmond AreaCalifornia Reflections, Pinole AreaWendt Ranch, Danville AreaAlamo Creek, Danville AreaIntervening Properties, Danville AreaDiablo Vista Ballfields, Danville AreaBella Flora, Richmond AreaBelmont Terrace, Pacheco AreaJune 13, 2017Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors501 Contra Costa County SECTION III Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY2017-18 PART D ccc1718_FER.docx - 18 - Francisco & Associates, Inc. PART D METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENT This section explains the benefits to be derived from the improvements and the methodology used to apportion the total assessments to the properties within the District. The method used for apportioning the assessment is based upon the relative special benefits to be derived by the properties in each Benefit Zone of the District over and above the general benefits conferred on real property to the public at large. The assessment is apportioned to each parcel in proportion to the relative cost of the special benefits from the improvements. Discussion of Benefit Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, permits the establishment of assessment districts by Agencies for the purpose of providing certain public improvements, which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping and street lighting improvements. Section 22573 of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." “The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000)) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." In addition, the 1972 Act permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22574). Thus, the 1972 Act requires the levy of a true "assessment" rather than a "special tax." Article XIIID, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution (also known as Proposition 218, approved by the California voters November 1996) limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. “No assessment shall be imposed on any parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel.” In addition, Article XIIID also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 502 Contra Costa County SECTION III Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY2017-18 PART D ccc1718_FER.docx - 19 - Francisco & Associates, Inc. assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways, and that portion of public property that is not developed and used for business purposes similar to private, commercial, industrial and institutional activities. Special versus General Benefit In the absence of an annual assessment, the improvements in each Benefit Zone of the District would not be provided, therefore the improvements are “over and above” what otherwise would be provided in other portions of the County as part of Public Works Facilities Division. All of the assessment proceeds derived from each Benefit Zone will be utilized to fund the cost of providing a level of tangible “special benefits” in the form of proximate landscaping and other permanent public improvements. The assessments are also structured to provide specific improvements within each Benefit Zone, further ensuring that the improvements funded by the assessments are of specific and special benefit to property within each Benefit Zone. Specific Benefit has been quantified as:  Unique proximity to improved landscaped area;  Access to improved landscape areas;  Improved views within each Zone; and  Extension of a property’s outdoor area for properties within close proximity to the improvements. Although these improvements may be available to the general public at large, the public landscaping and other public improvements in each Benefit Zone of the District were specifically designed, located and created to provide additional and improved public resources for the direct advantage of property inside the Benefit Zone, and not the public at large. The boundaries of the Benefit Zones have been narrowly drawn to include those parcels that receive a direct advantage from the improvements. Other properties that are outside a Benefit Zone do not enjoy the unique proximity, access, views and other special benefit factors described previously. Moreover, many of the homes and other improvements on parcels in the Benefit Zones would not have been built if the assessments were not established, because an assessment for public landscaping was a condition of development approval. Without the assessments, the public improvements within the Benefit Zones would not be maintained and would turn into brown, unmaintained and unusable public improvements and public lands. If this happened, it would create a significant and material negative impact on the desirability, utility and value of property in the Benefit Zone. The improvements are, therefore, clearly above what otherwise would be provided. In fact, it is reasonable to assume that if assessments were not collected and the improvements were not maintained as a result, properties in the Benefit Zones would decline in desirability, utility and value by significantly more than the amount of the assessments. It is therefore concluded that all the landscaping improvements funded by the assessments are of 99% special benefit to the identified benefiting properties located within the Benefit Zones and June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 503 Contra Costa County SECTION III Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY2017-18 PART D ccc1718_FER.docx - 20 - Francisco & Associates, Inc. that the value of the special benefits from such improvements to property in the Benefit Zones reasonably exceeds the cost of the assessments for every assessed parcel in the Benefit Zones. (In other words, as required by Proposition 218: the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each parcel reasonably exceeds the cost of the assessments.) The County owns, maintains, rehabilitates and replaces curb and gutter along the border of the Benefit Zone improvements. This curb and gutter serves to support, contain, retain, manage irrigation flow and plant growth, and provide a boundary for the improvements. The contribution from the County towards general benefit from the maintenance, rehabilitation and replacement of the curb and gutter is conservatively estimated to be 1%. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 504 Contra Costa County SECTION III Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY2017-18 PART D ccc1718_FER.docx - 21 - Francisco & Associates, Inc. PARKS BENEFIT DETERMINATION The overall quality of life and desirability of an area is enhanced when public parks and recreational facilities are in place, improved, operable, safe, clean and maintained. Conversely, property desirability decreases when park and recreational facilities are unsafe or destroyed by the elements or vandalism. Property desirability in an area also increases when there is an increase in the number of parks, recreation centers and sports facilities. These park and recreational facilities enable property owners to participate in sporting events, leisure activities, picnics, organized social events and other miscellaneous activities. Studies in a number of communities, including counties and cities throughout the United States, have indicated that recreation areas and facilities, if well maintained and wisely administered, have caused a marked increase in the property values of parcels in the community. Consequently, such recreation and park facilities have proved to be an important factor in maintaining a sound economic condition and a high standard of livability in the community. These studies confirm the opinion long held by planning authorities as to the economic value of parks and recreational facilities in a community. "The recreation value is realized as a rise in the value of land and other property in or near the recreation area, and is of both private interest to the landowner and others, holding an economic stake in the area, and of public interest to the taxpayers, who have a stake " (National Recreation and Park Association, June 1985) “Recreation and park amenities are central components in establishing the quality of life in a community… [businesses’] main resource is their employees for whom quality of life is an important issue. The availability and attractiveness of local parks and programs influences some companies relocation decisions… the presence of a park encourages real estate development around it.” (California Parks & Recreation, Winter 1997) The benefit of parks and other recreational facilities to residential and commercial/industrial properties has been summarized by a number of studies. The United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service, in a publication of June 1984, concluded that:  "Parks and recreation stimulate business and generate tax revenues."  "Parks and recreation help conserve land, energy, and resources."  "An investment in parks and recreation helps reduce pollution and noise, makes communities more livable, and increases property values."  "Public recreation benefits all employers by providing continuing opportunities to maintain a level of fitness throughout one's working life, and through helping individuals cope with the stress of a fast-paced and demanding life." Proper maintenance and operation of the parks within the District benefits those properties within the service areas of the parks by providing environmental quality and recreational enhancement. The amount of benefit received will vary with the different land use on the property. There are two categories from which the total benefit of a parcel is derived: June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 505 Contra Costa County SECTION III Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY2017-18 PART D ccc1718_FER.docx - 22 - Francisco & Associates, Inc. 1. Environmental Quality Benefit. The improvement of the quality of air, visual aesthetics and attractiveness of the community as a place to live and work and do business. 2. Recreation Enhancement Benefit. The availability of usable and safe park and recreational facilities. Recent studies have shown that adequate park and recreation facilities and recreation programs help to reduce crime and vandalism. This results in savings to property owners and improved property values and promotes the well-being of the community. LANDSCAPING BENEFIT DETERMINATION Trees, landscaping, hardscaping and appurtenant facilities, if well maintained, provide beautification, shade and enhancement of the desirability of the surroundings. In Parkways and Land Values, written by John Nolan and Henry V. Hubbard in 1937, it is stated: "... there is no lack of opinion, based on general principals and experience and common sense, that parkways do in fact add value to property, even though the amount cannot be determined exactly. Indeed, in most cases where public money has been spent for parkways the assumption has been definitely made that the proposed parkway will show a provable financial profit to the City. It has been believed that the establishment of parkways causes a rise in real estate values throughout the City, or in parts of the City,..." It should be noted that the definition of "parkways" above may include the roadway as well as the landscaping alongside the roadway. Proper maintenance and operation of the street landscaping provides beautification and enhancement of the desirability of surroundings. The Benefit Zones in the District enjoy a reputation for beauty, and the landscape improvements along the major thoroughfares in the medians and parkways enhance that reputation and benefit all parcels in each Benefit Zone. These major thoroughfares are the entryways into the various Benefit Zones and as such provide beautification to the entire Benefit Zone. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY The total operation, maintenance and servicing cost for the landscaping and public park facilities are apportioned in accordance with the methodology that is consistent with standard assessment engineering practices. The method for spreading the costs to each parcel is based on the Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) factor (with the exception of Benefit Zone 7 assessments, which are assessed on potential floor area ratios for commercial/industrial parcels and Benefit Zone 35 assessments which are assessed on acreage). Since the assessment is levied on the owners of properties as shown on the tax rolls, the final charges must be assigned by Assessor's Parcel Number. If assessments were to be distributed by parcel, not considering land use, this would not be equitable because a single-family parcel would be paying the same as a 50-unit apartment parcel or a large commercial establishment. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 506 Contra Costa County SECTION III Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY2017-18 PART D ccc1718_FER.docx - 23 - Francisco & Associates, Inc. Therefore, as previously stated, the total assessment costs are distributed to each parcel of land based on the number of EDUs associated with each particular parcel. Commercial and industrial parcels benefit similarly to residential parcels because of increased property values and the ability to have their workers and patrons use the park and recreational facilities. Commercial and industrial parcels are assessed based on their acreage because larger parcels have the ability to generate larger pedestrian flows. The methodology used to assign EDUs to other land uses in proportion to the benefit they receive relative to the single family residential parcel is shown below. Developed Single Family Residential - The developed single family parcel has been selected as the basic unit for calculation of the benefit assessments. This basic unit shall be called an Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Parcels designated as developed single family residential uses per the Contra Costa County land use code are assessed one (1.00) EDU. Developed Multiple Residential - The EDUs for land designated as developed multi-family uses which includes townhomes, condominiums, mobile homes and apartments are assessed a factor of one-half (0.50) EDU per dwelling unit, e.g., a parcel with a 100-unit apartment would be assessed 50 EDUs. Based on data from representative cities in Northern California, the multiple family residential factor of 50% is determined by the statistical proportion of relative trip generation from various types of residential uses, in combination with density per unit. Benefit Zones 27 & 45 are assessed as 1.0 EDUs per dwelling unit for townhomes and condominiums. Developed Commercial/Industrial, Recreational, Institutional, and Other Miscellaneous Uses - Developed commercial and industrial properties include commercial, industrial, recreational, institutional or miscellaneous uses per Contra Costa County land use codes. The parcels are assessed based upon their acreage. The parcels are assessed one (1.00) EDU for the first acre or any portion thereof, one (1.00) EDU/acre for each additional acre up to a maximum of three (3.00) EDUs. The minimum number of EDUs per parcel is one (1.00) EDU. Commercial, industrial, recreational, institutional or miscellaneous uses in Benefit Zone 7, both developed and undeveloped per Contra Costa County land use codes, are assessed based upon the potential floor area ratio of the parcel. The minimum rate per parcel will be one single family unit. Undeveloped Single Family Residential - Parcels defined as undeveloped single family residential parcels will be assessed at 50% of the developed single family rate or 0.50 EDU’s. Undeveloped Multiple Family Residential – The EDUs for land designated as undeveloped multi-family use which includes undeveloped townhomes, condominiums, mobile homes and apartments are assessed half of the developed EDU factor per planned dwelling unit. For example a parcel that is planned for a 100-unit apartment complex would be assessed 25 EDUs. If the number of planned dwelling units are not known, then the rate is 0.50 EDUs/acre with a minimum of 0.50 EDUs and a maximum of 1.50 EDUs. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 507 Contra Costa County SECTION III Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY2017-18 PART D ccc1718_FER.docx - 24 - Francisco & Associates, Inc. Undeveloped Non-Single Family Residential - Parcels defined as undeveloped non-single family residential will be assessed at 50% of the developed commercial/industrial rate. These parcels include undeveloped commercial/industrial, recreational, institutional and other miscellaneous parcels. These parcels will be assessed at 0.50 EDUs per acre or any portion thereof, with a minimum of 0.50 EDU per parcel and a maximum of 1.50 EDUs per parcel (3.00 acres). Incremental acreage greater than 3.00 acres is considered to be open space area and therefore receives no further assessment. Undeveloped property is described as parcels with no improved structures. Property values increase for undeveloped parcels when public infrastructure improvements are installed and well maintained. Exempt - Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of all public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, all easements and rights-of-ways, all public parks, cemeteries, greenbelts and parkways and all public school property, other public property, designated open space, and public utilities. BENEFIT ZONE CLASSIFICATION As properties develop throughout the County, they are annexed into the District. A specific Benefit Zone may be created for these properties or they may be included within an existing Benefit Zone, which is unique and distinguishable from other Benefit Zones located within the District. Each Benefit Zone is evaluated to determine which improvements are of a specific and direct benefit to the parcels in that Benefit Zone. Once the improvements have been identified, a method of allocating those costs to the benefiting parcels is developed. The following is a listing of the various Benefit Zones in the District, their corresponding number of parcels/units in each Benefit Zone, and the method of apportioning the costs of the improvements. Some Benefit Zones include an increase each year as allowed by the assessment formula when the Benefit Zone was formed.  Zones 1, 2, & 4 (Lynbrook Development - Bay Point) Subdivisions 5354, 5380, 5533, 5534, 5695, 5696 (old 6622), & MS11-84. Formed: 1979 Zone 1: 329 parcels; Zone 2: 127 parcels; Zone 4: 229 parcels Single family parcels are assessed 1.00 EDU/parcel and multi-family units are assessed 0.50 EDUs/unit. FY2017-18 Rate: $76.16 per EDU June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 508 Contra Costa County SECTION III Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY2017-18 PART D ccc1718_FER.docx - 25 - Francisco & Associates, Inc.  Zone 3 (Hickory Meadows - Bay Point Area) - Subdivision 5573 Formed: September 1979 78 Parcels Single family parcels are assessed 1.00 EDU/parcel and multi-family units are assessed 0.50 EDUs/unit. FY2017-18 Rate: $180.08 per EDU  Zone 5 (Pacheco Beautification Project – Pacheco Area) Formed: June 11, 2002 907 Parcels Zone 5 was formed in FY2002-03 with a maximum rate set at $46.50 per EDU + annual Consumer Price Index (CPI) increases for the San Francisco Bay Area - All Urban Consumers. The CPI starting index is 193.20 for June 30, 2002. The February 2017 CPI Index was 271.63, therefore the maximum rate for FY2017-18 is $65.38 per EDU. Maximum Rate: $65.38 per EDU FY2017-18 Rate: $65.38 per EDU  Zone 7 (Pleasant Hill/BART – Contra Costa Centre Area) Formed: July 30, 1985 250 Parcels Each of the parcels located within this zone will be assessed based upon their proportional share of benefit as follows: Residential property is assessed $16.12/parcel Commercial parcels are assessed $.0291708 per potential or actual square footage depending upon which amount is greater  Zone 10 (Viewpointe - Bay Point Area) Subdivision 6484 Formed: March 3, 1987 119 Parcels Each of the parcels located within this zone will be assessed an equal share of the total assessment. Single family parcels are assessed 1.00 EDU/parcel and multi-family units are assessed 0.50 EDUs/unit. FY2017-18 Rate: $151.86 per EDU June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 509 Contra Costa County SECTION III Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY2017-18 PART D ccc1718_FER.docx - 26 - Francisco & Associates, Inc.  Zone 11 (Hilltop Commons - San Pablo Area) LUP 2042-85 Formed: February 10, 1987 1 Parcel This zone consists of multiple family residential units and there is one (1) parcel associated with all the residential units. The total assessment for this zone is assessed to the underlying parcel. The maximum assessment is $6,000, and the parcel will be assessed $6,000 for FY2017-18. FY2017-18 Rate: $6,000 per parcel  Zone 17 (Shadow Creek – Danville Area) Subdivisions 7279, 7040 & 7041 Formed: April 25, 1989 477 Parcels Each of the parcels located within this zone will be assessed an equal share of the total assessment. FY2017-18 Rate: $150.00 per EDU  Zone 18 (Pacheco Manor – Pacheco Area) Subdivision 6958 Formed: June 7, 1988 22 Parcels Each of the parcels located within this zone will be assessed an equal share of the total assessment. FY2017-18 Rate: $175.94 per EDU  Zone 19 (Hidden Pond – Reliez Valley/Martinez Area) Subdivisions 6769, 7144, 7151, 7820, & 7821. Formed: August 7, 1990 Annexed Tract 7144: January 9, 1996 130 Parcels Each of the parcels located within this zone will be assessed an equal share of the total assessment. FY2017-18 Rate: $200.00 per EDU June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 510 Contra Costa County SECTION III Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY2017-18 PART D ccc1718_FER.docx - 27 - Francisco & Associates, Inc.  Zone 21 (Kensington - Kensington Area) Formed: June 6, 1989 2,256 Parcels Each of the parcels located within this zone will be assessed an equal share of the total assessment based upon their land use. Single family residential parcels located within the Kensington area shall be assessed $13.66/parcel. Multi-family/Residential units and Mobile Home units shall be assessed half the single family rate per unit. Commercial will be assessed three times the single-family rate for each acre. FY2017-18 Rate: $13.66 per EDU  Zone 22 (Seabreeze – Bay Point Area) Subdivisions 7152 & 8830 Formed: August 13, 1991 Subdivision 8830 annexed February 26, 2008 – 17 single family parcels 154 Total Parcels Each of the parcels located within this zone will be assessed an equal share of the total assessment. FY2017-18 Rate: $290.00 per EDU  Zone 27 (Bettencourt Ranch and Somerset – Danville Area) Subdivisions 7188, 7277, 7278, 7280 & 7763 Formed: August 6, 1991 571 Parcels Each of the parcels located within this zone will be assessed an equal share of the total assessment. In FY04-05, in order to spread the costs in proportion to the benefit each parcel receives, subzone “A” was developed. Subzone “A” is Tract 7763 which is on a private street and receives a reduced level of landscaping. Each of the 421 parcels not located within subzone “A” (subdivisions 7188, 7277, 7278 & 7280) will be assessed at the full assessment rate of $150.00 per EDU Subzone “A” Each of the 150 parcels located within subzone “A” (subdivision 7763) will be assessed approximately 70% of the full assessment rate of $150.00, which is $105.68 per EDU. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 511 Contra Costa County SECTION III Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY2017-18 PART D ccc1718_FER.docx - 28 - Francisco & Associates, Inc.  Zone 35 (Sandy Cove Shopping Center – Discovery Bay Area) MS 39-91, DP 3031-94 & Tract 8456 Formed: May 5, 1998 9 Parcels Reconfirmed: May 13, 2003 In February 2003 the rate for commercial parcels was re-confirmed based upon their net developable acreage at $1,434.92/acre + CPI increases for the San Francisco Bay Area – All Urban Consumers. The CPI starting index is 197.70 for February 2003. The February 2017 CPI Index is 271.63, therefore the maximum rate for FY2017-18 is $1,971.46 per acre. Maximum Rate: $1,971.46 per acre FY2017-18 Rate: $1,971.46 per acre  Zone 36 (Alamo Beautification - Alamo Area) Formed: August 6, 1991 5,498 Parcels Each of the parcels located within this zone will be assessed an equal share of the total assessment. FY2017-18 Rate: $9.36 per single family parcel  Zone 37 (Clyde - Clyde Area) Formed: July 23, 1991 286 Parcels Each of the parcels located in this zone will be assessed an equal share of the total assessment, except for parcels owned by senior citizens. These parcels receive a fifty percent (50%) reduction in assessments. FY2017-18 Rate: $41.76 per single family parcel June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 512 Contra Costa County SECTION III Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY2017-18 PART D ccc1718_FER.docx - 29 - Francisco & Associates, Inc.  Zone 38 (Rodeo - Rodeo Area) Formed: July 23, 1991 2,556 Parcels Each of the parcels located in this zone will be assessed an equal share of the total assessment. In order to spread the costs in proportion to the benefit, two subzones have been developed. Subzone “A” Parcels located within Subzone “A” will be assessed at the full assessment rate of $32.04 per EDU. Subzone “B” Parcels located within Subzone “B” (View Point Park (Tracts 4326, 4327, 4328, 4329 & 4958) Subdivision) will be assessed at 85% of the full assessment rate. Since these subdivisions have access to View Point Park through their Homeowner’s Association, it reduces the demand on the Lefty Gomez picnic and play area (exclusive of the Community Center). Therefore, the parcels in Benefit Subzone “B” will pay an assessment rate reduced by $4.80 per EDU or $27.24 per EDU.  Zone 42 (California Skyline – Bay Point Area) Tracts 7597, 7737 & 7838 Formed: July 7, 1993; Tract 7838 Annexed June 11, 1996 343 Parcels Each of the parcels located in this zone will be assessed an equal share of the total assessment. FY2017-18 Rate: $210.00 per EDU  Zone 45 (Alamo Villas – Alamo Area) Tract 7559 Formed: July 26, 1994 10 Parcels Each of the parcels located within this zone will be assessed an equal share of the total assessment. FY2017-18 Rate: $120.00 per EDU June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 513 Contra Costa County SECTION III Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY2017-18 PART D ccc1718_FER.docx - 30 - Francisco & Associates, Inc.  Zone 48 (Mrack Road – Danville Area) Subdivisions 7613, 7621, 7776, 7777, 7778, 7779, 7780, 8104 and DP03-3009 (4 parcels) Formed: July 26, 1994 DP03-3009 (MS04-0020) annexed July 12, 2005 – 4 parcels 72 Parcels Each of the parcels located within this zone will be assessed an equal share of the total assessment. FY2017-18 Rate: $490.00 per EDU  Zone 54 (Alamo Country – Alamo) Subdivisions 7601 & 7818 Formed: December 20, 1994; Rate Increase July 8, 2002 93 Parcels Each of the parcels located within this zone will be assessed an equal share of the total assessment. The maximum rate was increased in FY2002-03 and set at $275.00 per EDU + CPI. The CPI had a starting index of 193.20 as of June 30, 2002. The February 2017 CPI Index is 271.63, therefore the maximum rate for FY2017-18 is $386.62 per EDU. Maximum Rate: $386.62 per EDU FY2017-18 Rate: $386.62 per EDU  Zone 57 (Pacific Waterways – Discovery Bay Area) Subdivisions 7679, 7881, 7907, 7908 & 7909. Formed: December 20, 1994 380 Parcels Each of the parcels located within this zone will be assessed an equal share of the total assessment. FY2017-18 Rate: $231.00 per EDU June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 514 Contra Costa County SECTION III Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY2017-18 PART D ccc1718_FER.docx - 31 - Francisco & Associates, Inc.  Zone 61 (Discovery Bay West - Discovery Bay Area) Tract 7686, 8143, 8166, 8167, 8023, 8428, 8429, 8430, 8431, 8432, 8433, 8570, 8571, 8572, 8577, 8578, 8579, 8580, 8827, 8828, 8892, 8993, and 9067. Formed: November 2, 1999 1,924 parcels Each of the parcels at build-out will be assessed an equal share of the total assessment. The maximum rate for this zone was set at $200.00 per EDU. However the maximum rate was decreased to $190.00 per EDU in FY2001-02 due to the formation of a separate Benefit Parking District. Maximum Rate: $190.00 per EDU FY2017-18 Rate: $150.00 per EDU  Zone 63 (Parkway Estates – North Richmond Area) Tract 7903 Formed: October 27, 1997 87 Parcels Each of the parcels located within this zone will be assessed an equal share of the total assessment. FY2017-18 Rate: $230.00 per EDU  Zone 64 (California Reflections – Pinole Area) Tract 7661 Formed: January 9, 1996 31 Parcels Each of the parcels located within this zone will be assessed an equal share of the total assessment. Maximum Rate: $300.00 per EDU FY2017-18 Rate: $250.00 per EDU  Zone 68 (Wendt Ranch – Danville Area) Tract 8002 Formed: October 10, 2000 Modified: Fiscal Year 2005-06 125 Parcels at build out Each of the 125 parcels at build-out located in this zone will be assessed an equal share of the total assessment. The maximum rate for FY2017-18 is $300.00 per EDU. However, this area is currently maintained by a Homeowner’s Association, so therefore the rate for FY2017-18 has been set at $5.00 per EDU to cover administrative costs. Maximum Rate: $300.00 per EDU FY2017-18 Rate: $5.00 per EDU June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 515 Contra Costa County SECTION III Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY2017-18 PART D ccc1718_FER.docx - 32 - Francisco & Associates, Inc.  Zone 69 (Alamo Creek – Danville Area) Tract 8382, & 8381 Formed: June 12, 2006 679 single family, 127 townhomes and 120 unit senior housing at build out Each of the parcels located within this zone is assessed an equal share of the total assessment. Single family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel, townhomes are assessed at 0.50 EDU/parcel and the senior housing is assessed at 0.50 EDU/unit. It is estimated that at build out of the zone the total amount needed to maintain the public improvements for Zone 69 on an annual basis is $853,185.90 (FY2006-07 dollars). (679 single family units * 1.00 EDU) + (127 townhomes * 0.50) + (120 senior units * 0.50) = 802.50 EDUs $853,185.90 divided by 802.50 EDUs = $1,063.16/EDU The maximum assessment rate was set in Fiscal Year 2006-07 at $1,063.16 per EDU with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the San Francisco Bay Area All Urban Consumers as of June, 2006 (209.1). The February 2017 CPI Index is 271.63, therefore the maximum rate for FY2017-18 is $1,381.07 per EDU. However, this area is currently maintained by a Homeowner’s Association, so therefore the rate for FY2017-18 has been set at $5.00 per EDU to cover administrative costs. Maximum Rate: $1,381.07 per EDU FY2017-18 Rate: $5.00 per EDU  Zone 70 (Intervening Properties – Danville Area) Tract 8331 Formed: October 4, 2005 378 single family parcels and 96 apartment units at build out Each of the parcels located within this zone is assessed an equal share of the total annual assessment. Single family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel, and the apartment complex is assessed at 0.50 EDU/unit. The maximum assessment rate was set in Fiscal Year 2005-06 at $315.00 per EDU with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the San Francisco Bay Area All Urban Consumers as of June, 2005 (201.20). The February 2017 CPI Index is 271.63, therefore the maximum rate for FY2017-18 is $425.28 per EDU. The rate for FY2017-18 has been set at $140.00 per EDU. Maximum Rate: $425.28 per EDU FY2017-18 Rate: $175.00 per EDU June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 516 Contra Costa County SECTION III Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY2017-18 PART D ccc1718_FER.docx - 33 - Francisco & Associates, Inc.  Zone 71 (Diablo Vista Ballfields – Danville Area) Tract 8331, 8381, & 8382 Formed: October 4, 2005 1,059 single family parcels at build out Each of the parcels located within this zone will be assessed an equal share of the total annual assessment. Zone 71 was annexed in FY2005-06 and the maximum assessment rate was set at $80.00 per EDU with an allowance for a CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the San Francisco Bay Area All Urban Consumers as of June 2005 (201.20). Zone 71 was created per a Settlement Agreement (January 27, 2004) with the Town of Danville, Contra Costa County, the San Ramon Valley Unified School District, and the Integrated Project Developers. Each year the revenue will be collected and used to provide for the enhanced maintenance of the ball fields. Approximately $5.00/EDU each year will be used to cover administrative costs associated with levying the assessment. The February 2017 CPI Index is 271.63, therefore the maximum rate for FY2017-18 is $108.01 per EDU. Maximum Rate: $108.01 per EDU FY2017-18 Rate: $108.01 per EDU *Please Note: Per the December 15, 2009 Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement between the Town of Danville, San Ramon Valley Unified School District (SRVUSD) and Contra Costa County, SRVUSD is responsible for maintenance of this area. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 517 Contra Costa County SECTION III Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY2017-18 PART D ccc1718_FER.docx - 34 - Francisco & Associates, Inc.  Zone 74 (Bella Flora – Richmond Area) Subdivisions 8755 & 9293 (old 8938) Formed: June 12, 2006 (Resolution 2006/370) 173 single family parcels at build out Annexation: January 8, 2008 (Subd. 9293 “old 8938”) 355 Parcels Each of the parcels within this zone is assessed an equal share of the total assessment for this zone. Single family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel, condominiums and townhomes are assessed 0.75 EDU/unit. It is estimated that at build out of the zone the total amount needed to maintain the public improvements for Zone 74 on an annual basis is $260,250 (FY2007-08 dollars). (173 single family units * 1.00 EDU) + (95 single family units * 1.00 EDU) + (120 townhome units * 0.75 EDU) + (140 condominium units * 0.75 EDU) = 463.00 EDUs The maximum assessment rate was set at $550.00 per EDU with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the San Francisco Bay Area All Urban Consumers as of June, 2006 (209.1). The February 2017 CPI Index is 271.63, therefore the maximum rate for FY2017-18 is $714.48 per EDU. Maximum Rate: $714.48 per EDU FY2017-18 Rate: $340.00 per EDU (Subd 8755) FY2017-18 Rate: $0.00 per EDU (Subd 9293 “old 8938”) June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 518 Contra Costa County SECTION III Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY2017-18 PART D ccc1718_FER.docx - 35 - Francisco & Associates, Inc.  Zone 75 (Belmont Terrace – Pacheco Area) Tracts 8984, 8967 and an institutional parcel Formed: February 27, 2007 Annexation: Subdivision 8967 (89 Courtyard units and 1 institutional parcel), May 13, 2008 217 courtyard units + 1 single family parcel + 1 institutional parcel Each of the parcels located within this zone will be assessed their benefiting share of the total assessment for this zone. The courtyard homes are classified as townhomes per the County Assessor and parcels are assessed at 0.75 EDU/parcel and single family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel. The 0.96 acre institutional parcel is assessed 1.00 EDU based on its acreage. It is estimated that at build out of the Zone the total amount needed to maintain the public improvements for Zone 75 on an annual basis is $42,525.88 (FY2008-09 dollars). (217 courtyard units *0.75 EDU/unit) = 162.75 EDUs (1 single family parcel *1.00 EDU/parcel) = 1.00 EDU (0.96 institutional acres) = 1.00 EDU The maximum assessment rate was set at $254.11 per EDU with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the San Francisco Bay Area All Urban Consumers as of June, 2006 (209.1). The February 2017 CPI Index is 271.63, therefore the maximum rate for FY2017-18 is $330.08 per EDU. However, this area is currently maintained by a Homeowner’s Association, so therefore the rate for FY2017-18 has been set at $5.00 per EDU to cover administrative costs. Maximum Rate: $330.08 per EDU FY2017-18 Rate: $5.00 per EDU June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 519 Contra Costa County SECTION III Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY2017-18 PART E ccc1718_FER.docx - 36 - Francisco & Associates, Inc. PART E PROPERTY LIST & ASSESSMENT ROLL The total assessment amount for each Benefit Zone and the proposed assessment amount apportioned to each parcel for Fiscal Year 2017-18, in proportion to the benefit received by each parcel from the improvements, is contained in the Assessment Roll, which is on file in the Office of the Contra Costa County Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, the Contra Costa County Public Works Department, the Contra Costa County Public Works website and shown in Appendix “C”. The Assessment Roll includes a list of all parcel numbers within the District that have been updated to match the last equalized Property Tax Roll of the Contra Costa County Assessor, which by reference is hereby made a part of this report. The last equalized Property Tax Roll includes a description of each parcel and shall govern for all details concerning the description of the parcels. The total proposed assessment for the 2017-18 Fiscal Year is $1,444,650.40. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 520 Contra Costa County Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY2017-18 APPENDIX A ccc1718_FER.docx Francisco & Associates, Inc. APPENDIX A DETAILED PROJECT COST BREAKDOWN June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 521 Contra Costa County Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2017-18 APPENDIX A Special Districts Budget Worksheet Entity: LL2 Zones 1, 2 & 4 / Fund 2830 (LYNBROOK DEVELOPMENT - BAY POINT) Maximum assessment is:$76.16 / EDU FY 2017-18 -Assessments @ $76.16 / EDU FY 2017-18 -Assessments @ $38.08 / MFR Unit 805.75 EDUs 685 Parcels FY 2016-17 6 month actuals/ 6 month projections FY 2017-18 Prop. Budget Fund Balance as of June 30 ($159,578.81)($152,679.48) Revenues: Taxes and assessments $61,365.92 $61,365.92 Interfund Rev. Gov/Gov $0.00 $0.00 Earnings on Investment $0.00 $0.00 Total Revenue Available:($98,212.89)($91,313.56) Expenditures: Office Expense $0.00 $0.00 Publications & Legal Notices $0.00 $0.00 Interest on Notes & Warrants $0.00 $0.00 Tax & Assessment Fees ($832.25)($833.00) Interfund Exp $0.00 $0.00 Utilities - Water & Electricity ($2,233.16)($1,000.00) Other Special Departmental $0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (out of house, contractor)$0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (in house)($11,173.16)($12,000.00) Professional Services (Non-County Staff)($1,147.22)($1,197.20) Professional Services (County Staff)($1,497.80)($1,600.00) Playground Inspection $0.00 $0.00 Vandalism/Incidentals $0.00 $0.00 Lynbrook Park Maintenance*($37,583.00)($37,583.00) Capital Improvement Projects & Reserves: Operating Reserves (50% of Revenue)$0.00 $0.00 Total Expenditures:($54,466.59)($54,213.20) Balance Forward to Ensuing Year ($152,679.48)($145,526.76) *Please Note: Per the June 26, 2012 JEPA between Contra Costa County and Ambrose Recreation & Park District, Ambrose Recreation & Park District is responsible for Lynbrook Park. apxA_1718budgets_fer(2017-05-17).xlsx - Z_01,2,4 A - 1 Francisco & Associates June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 522 Contra Costa County Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2017-18 APPENDIX A Special Districts Budget Worksheet Entity: LL2 Zone 3 / Fund 2831 (HICKORY MEADOWS - BAY POINT) Maximum assessment is:$180.08 / EDU FY 2017-18 -Assessments @ $180.08 / EDU 78.00 EDUs 78 Parcels FY 2016-17 6 month actuals/ 6 month projections FY 2017-18 Prop. Budget Fund Balance as of June 30 $6,934.91 $15,646.93 Revenues: Taxes and assessments $14,046.24 $14,046.24 Interfund Rev. Gov/Gov $0.00 $0.00 Earnings on Investment $0.00 $0.00 Total Revenue Available:$20,981.15 $29,693.17 Expenditures: Office Expense $0.00 $0.00 Publications & Legal Notices $0.00 $0.00 Interest on Notes & Warrants $0.00 $0.00 Tax & Assessment Fees ($316.21)($317.00) Interfund Exp $0.00 $0.00 Utilities - Water & Electricity $0.00 $0.00 Other Special Departmental $0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (out of house, contractor)$0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (in house)$0.00 $0.00 Professional Services (Non-County Staff)($275.01)($274.03) Professional Services (County Staff)($600.00)($800.00) Playground Inspections $0.00 $0.00 Vandalism/Incidentals $0.00 $0.00 Hickory Meadows Park Maintenance*($4,143.00)($4,143.00) Capital Improvement Projects & Reserves: Playground Improvements $0.00 ($17,136.02) Operating Reserves (50% of Revenue)$0.00 ($7,023.12) Total Expenditures:($5,334.22)($29,693.17) Balance Forward to Ensuing Year $15,646.93 $0.00 *Please Note: Per the June 26, 2012 JEPA between Contra Costa County and Ambrose Recreation & Park District, Ambrose Recreation & Park District is responsible for Hickory Meadows Park. apxA_1718budgets_fer(2017-05-17).xlsx - Z_03 A - 2 Francisco & Associates June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 523 Contra Costa County Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2017-18 APPENDIX A Special Districts Budget Worksheet Entity: LL2 Zone 5 / Fund 2824 (PACHECO BEAUTIFICATION - PACHECO AREA) Maximum assessment is:$65.38 / EDU FY 2017-18 -Assessments @ $65.38 / EDU 867.73 EDUs 907 Parcels FY 2016-17 6 month actuals/ 6 month projections FY 2017-18 Prop. Budget Fund Balance as of June 30 $85,292.19 $90,674.40 Revenues: Taxes and assessments $54,841.16 $56,730.30 Interfund Rev. Gov/Gov $52,274.56 $0.00 Earnings on Investment $75.99 $0.00 Measure WW Grant Funds $0.00 $0.00 Total Revenue Available:$192,483.90 $147,404.70 Expenditures: Office Expense $0.00 $0.00 Publications & Legal Notices $0.00 $0.00 Interest on Notes & Warrants $0.00 $0.00 Tax & Assessment Fees ($1,020.95)($1,021.00) Interfund Exp ($1.00)($2.00) Utilities - Water & Electricity ($3,517.69)($2,400.00) Other Special Departmental $0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (out of house, contractor)($10,353.00)$0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (in house)($31,214.59)($37,000.00) Professional Services (Non-County Staff)($1,087.89)($1,097.95) Professional Services (County Staff)($1,980.63)($6,000.00) Facilities Maintenance ($359.19)($500.00) Playground Inspection $0.00 $0.00 Vandalism/Incidentals $0.00 $0.00 Creekside Improvement Study $0.00 $0.00 Measure WW - Pacheco Creekside Park Trail Improvements ($52,274.56)$0.00 Capital Improvement Projects & Reserves: Park and Median Improvements $0.00 ($71,018.60) Operating Reserves (50% of Revenue)$0.00 ($28,365.15) Total Expenditures:($101,809.50)($147,404.70) Balance Forward to Ensuing Year $90,674.40 $0.00 CPI Info. Date Actual CPI Increase Rate Jun-02 193.20 $46.50 Feb-14 248.62 2.45%$59.84 Feb-15 254.91 2.53%$61.36 Feb-16 262.60 3.02%$63.21 Feb-17 271.63 3.44%$65.38 apxA_1718budgets_fer(2017-05-17).xlsx - Z_05 A - 3 Francisco & Associates June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 524 Contra Costa County Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2017-18 APPENDIX A Special Districts Budget Worksheet Entity: LL2 Zone 7 / Fund 2834 (PLEASANT HILL/BART - CONTRA COSTA CENTRE AREA) Maximum assessment is:$16.12 / SFR Parcel FY 2017-18 -Assessments @ $16.12 / SFR Parcel FY 2017-18 -Assessments @ $0.0291708 / SQ FT 250 Parcels FY 2016-17 6 month actuals/ 6 month projections FY 2017-18 Prop. Budget Fund Balance as of June 30 $7,930.66 $19,323.86 Revenues: Taxes and assessments $81,433.62 $81,433.62 Interfund Rev. Gov/Gov $0.00 $0.00 Earnings on Investment $0.00 $0.00 Reimbursements - Gov/Gov $111,854.24 $50,400.00 Total Revenue Available:$201,218.52 $151,157.48 Expenditures: Office Expense $0.00 $0.00 Publications & Legal Notices $0.00 $0.00 Interest on Notes & Warrants $0.00 $0.00 Tax & Assessment Fees ($462.50)($462.50) Interfund Exp $0.00 $0.00 Building Occupancy Cost ($0.92)($1.00) Utilities - Water & Electricity ($48,363.10)($40,000.00) Other Special Departmental $0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (out of house, contractor)($123,275.18)($65,200.00) Grounds Maintenance - (in house)$0.00 $0.00 Professional Services (Non-County Staff)($1,615.09)($1,588.70) Professional Services (County Staff)($8,177.87)($11,000.00) Playground Inspection $0.00 $0.00 Vandalism/Incidentals $0.00 $0.00 Capital Improvement Projects & Reserves: Median and Frontage Improvements $0.00 ($7,121.09) Operating Reserves (50% of Revenue)$0.00 ($25,784.19) Total Expenditures:($181,894.66)($151,157.48) Balance Forward to Ensuing Year $19,323.86 $0.00 apxA_1718budgets_fer(2017-05-17).xlsx - Z_07 A - 4 Francisco & Associates June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 525 Contra Costa County Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2017-18 APPENDIX A Special Districts Budget Worksheet Entity: LL2 Zone 10 / Fund 2836 (VIEWPOINTE - BAY POINT AREA) Maximum assessment is:$151.86 / EDU FY 2017-18 -Assessments @ $151.86 / EDU 119.00 EDUs 119 Parcels FY 2016-17 6 month actuals/ 6 month projections FY 2017-18 Prop. Budget Fund Balance as of June 30 ($61,644.45)($102,095.50) Revenues: Taxes and assessments $18,071.34 $18,071.34 Interfund Rev. Gov/Gov $0.00 $0.00 Earnings on Investment $0.00 $0.00 Total Revenue Available:($43,573.11)($84,024.16) Expenditures: Office Expense $0.00 $0.00 Publications & Legal Notices $0.00 $0.00 Interest on Notes & Warrants $0.00 $0.00 Tax & Assessment Fees ($351.15)($351.15) Interfund Exp $0.00 $0.00 Utilities - Water & Electricity ($5,002.71)($5,000.00) Other Special Departmental $0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (out of house, contractor)$0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (in house)($8,380.36)($8,075.00) Professional Services (Non-County Staff)($358.41)($352.56) Professional Services (County Staff)($894.97)($900.00) Playground Inspection $0.00 $0.00 Vandalism/Incidentals $0.00 $0.00 Viewpointe Park Maintenance*($2,240.00)($2,240.00) Trail Clean-up Project ($41,294.79)$0.00 Capital Improvement Projects & Reserves: Operating Reserves (50% of Revenue)$0.00 $0.00 Total Expenditures:($58,522.39)($16,918.71) Balance Forward to Ensuing Year ($102,095.50)($100,942.87) *Please Note: Per the June 26, 2012 JEPA between Contra Costa County and Ambrose Recreation & Park District, Ambrose Recreation & Park District is responsible for Viewpoint Park. apxA_1718budgets_fer(2017-05-17).xlsx - Z_10 A - 5 Francisco & AssociatesJune 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 526 Contra Costa County Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2017-18 APPENDIX A Special Districts Budget Worksheet Entity: LL2 Zone 11 / Fund 2839 (HILLTOP COMMONS - SAN PABLO AREA) Maximum assessment is:$6,000.00 / EDU FY 2017-18 -Assessments @ $6,000.00 / EDU 1.00 EDUs 1 Parcels FY 2016-17 6 month actuals/ 6 month projections FY 2017-18 Prop. Budget Fund Balance as of June 30 $11,783.43 $15,149.90 Revenues: Taxes and assessments $6,000.00 $6,000.00 Interfund Rev. Gov/Gov $0.00 $0.00 Earnings on Investment $0.00 $0.00 Total Revenue Available:$17,783.43 $21,149.90 Expenditures: Office Expense $0.00 $0.00 Publications & Legal Notices $0.00 $0.00 Interest on Notes & Warrants $0.00 $0.00 Tax & Assessment Fees ($250.85)($251.00) Interfund Exp $0.00 $0.00 Utilities - Water & Electricity $0.00 $0.00 Other Special Departmental $0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (out of house, contractor)$0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (in house)$0.00 ($1,100.00) Professional Services (Non-County Staff)($389.00)($117.05) Professional Services (County Staff)($385.10)($1,000.00) Playground Inspection $0.00 $0.00 Vandalism/Incidentals ($1,608.58)($500.00) Median Improvement Study $0.00 ($15,181.85) Capital Improvement Projects & Reserves: Operating Reserves (50% of Revenue)$0.00 ($3,000.00) Total Expenditures:($2,633.53)($21,149.90) Balance Forward to Ensuing Year $15,149.90 $0.00 apxA_1718budgets_fer(2017-05-17).xlsx - Z_11 A - 6 Francisco & Associates June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 527 Contra Costa County Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2017-18 APPENDIX A Special Districts Budget Worksheet Entity: LL2 Zone 17 / Fund 2844 (SHADOW CREEK - DANVILLE AREA) Maximum assessment is:$150.00 / EDU FY 2017-18 -Assessments @ $150.00 / EDU 477.00 EDUs 477 Parcels FY 2016-17 6 month actuals/ 6 month projections FY 2017-18 Prop. Budget Fund Balance as of June 30 $134,617.61 $84,332.42 Revenues: Taxes and assessments $71,550.00 $71,550.00 Interfund Rev. Gov/Gov $0.00 $0.00 Earnings on Investment $151.97 $0.00 Total Revenue Available:$206,319.58 $155,882.42 Expenditures: Office Expense $0.00 $0.00 Publications & Legal Notices $0.00 $0.00 Interest on Notes & Warrants $0.00 $0.00 Tax & Assessment Fees ($655.45)($656.00) Interfund Exp ($1.00)($1.00) Utilities - Water & Electricity ($25,002.98)($20,000.00) Other Special Departmental $0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (out of house, contractor)$0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (in house)($41,424.70)($65,000.00) Professional Services (Non-County Staff)($1,419.07)($1,395.88) Professional Services (County Staff)($3,483.96)($6,000.00) Playground Inspection $0.00 $0.00 Vandalism/Incidentals $0.00 $0.00 Capital Improvement Projects & Reserves: Frontage Landscaping and Irrigation Improvements ($50,000.00)($27,054.54) Operating Reserves (50% of Revenue)$0.00 ($35,775.00) Total Expenditures:($121,987.16)($155,882.42) Balance Forward to Ensuing Year $84,332.42 $0.00 apxA_1718budgets_fer(2017-05-17).xlsx - Z_17 A - 7 Francisco & Associates June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 528 Contra Costa County Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2017-18 APPENDIX A Special Districts Budget Worksheet Entity: LL2 Zone 18 / Fund 2843 (PACHECO MANOR - PACHECO AREA) Maximum assessment is:$175.94 / EDU FY 2017-18 -Assessments @ $175.94 / EDU 22.00 EDUs 22 Parcels FY 2016-17 6 month actuals/ 6 month projections FY 2017-18 Prop. Budget Fund Balance as of June 30 $2,152.15 $1,613.01 Revenues: Taxes and assessments $3,870.68 $3,870.68 Interfund Rev. Gov/Gov $0.00 $0.00 Earnings on Investment $0.00 $0.00 Total Revenue Available:$6,022.83 $5,483.69 Expenditures: Office Expense $0.00 $0.00 Publications & Legal Notices $0.00 $0.00 Interest on Notes & Warrants $0.00 $0.00 Tax & Assessment Fees ($268.70)($268.70) Interfund Exp $0.00 $0.00 Utilities - Water & Electricity ($159.03)($200.00) Other Special Departmental $0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (out of house, contractor)$0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (in house)($2,479.39)($1,500.00) Professional Services (Non-County Staff)($76.77)($75.51) Professional Services (County Staff)($418.61)($500.00) Playground Inspection $0.00 $0.00 Vandalism/Incidentals $0.00 $0.00 Shrub Trimming ($1,007.32)$0.00 Capital Improvement Projects & Reserves: Frontage Landscaping Improvements $0.00 ($1,004.14) Operating Reserves (50% of Revenue)$0.00 ($1,935.34) Total Expenditures:($4,409.82)($5,483.69) Balance Forward to Ensuing Year $1,613.01 $0.00 apxA_1718budgets_fer(2017-05-17).xlsx - Z_18 A - 8 Francisco & Associates June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 529 Contra Costa County Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2017-18 APPENDIX A Special Districts Budget Worksheet Entity: LL2 Zone 19 / Fund 2849 (HIDDEN POND - RELIEZ VALLEY/MARTINEZ AREA) Maximum assessment is:$200.00 / EDU FY 2017-18 -Assessments @ $200.00 / EDU 130.00 EDUs 130 Parcels FY 2016-17 6 month actuals/ 6 month projections FY 2017-18 Prop. Budget Fund Balance as of June 30 $28,897.85 $28,855.51 Revenues: Taxes and assessments $26,000.00 $26,000.00 Interfund Rev. Gov/Gov $0.00 $0.00 Earnings on Investment $0.00 $0.00 Total Revenue Available:$54,897.85 $54,855.51 Expenditures: Office Expense $0.00 $0.00 Publications & Legal Notices $0.00 $0.00 Interest on Notes & Warrants $0.00 $0.00 Tax & Assessment Fees ($360.50)($360.50) Interfund Exp $0.00 $0.00 Utilities - Water & Electricity ($3,785.94)($3,000.00) Other Special Departmental $0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (out of house, contractor)$0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (in house)($18,006.24)($18,000.00) Professional Services (Non-County Staff)($2,435.66)($507.24) Professional Services (County Staff)($1,454.00)($2,500.00) Playground Inspection $0.00 $0.00 Vandalism/Incidentals $0.00 ($100.00) Landscape Improvement Study ($0.00)$0.00 Capital Improvement Projects & Reserves: Frontage Landscaping Improvements $0.00 ($17,387.77) Operating Reserves (50% of Revenue)$0.00 ($13,000.00) Total Expenditures:($26,042.34)($54,855.51) Balance Forward to Ensuing Year $28,855.51 ($0.00) apxA_1718budgets_fer(2017-05-17).xlsx - Z_19 A - 9 Francisco & Associates June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 530 Contra Costa County Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2017-18 APPENDIX A Special Districts Budget Worksheet Entity: LL2 Zone 21 / Fund 2846 (KENSINGTON AREA) Maximum assessment is:$13.66 / EDU FY 2017-18 -Assessments @ $13.66 / EDU 2,244.21 EDUs 2,256 Parcels FY 2016-17 6 month actuals/ 6 month projections FY 2017-18 Prop. Budget Fund Balance as of June 30 $16,510.25 $10,654.29 Revenues: Taxes and assessments $30,655.40 $30,655.40 Interfund Rev. Gov/Gov $0.00 $0.00 Earnings on Investment $0.00 $0.00 Total Revenue Available:$47,165.65 $41,309.69 Expenditures: Office Expense $0.00 $0.00 Publications & Legal Notices $0.00 $0.00 Interest on Notes & Warrants $0.00 $0.00 Tax & Assessment Fees ($2,167.51)($2,168.00) Interfund Exp $0.00 $0.00 Utilities - Water & Electricity ($667.10)($1,000.00) Other Special Departmental $0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (out of house, contractor)$0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (in house)($28,940.57)($20,000.00) Professional Services (Non-County Staff)($607.86)($598.06) Professional Services (County Staff)($4,128.32)($5,000.00) Playground Inspection $0.00 $0.00 Vandalism/Incidentals $0.00 $0.00 Capital Improvement Projects & Reserves: Operating Reserves (50% of Revenue)$0.00 ($12,543.63) Total Expenditures:($36,511.36)($41,309.69) Balance Forward to Ensuing Year $10,654.29 $0.00 apxA_1718budgets_fer(2017-05-17).xlsx - Z_21 A - 10 Francisco & Associates June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 531 Contra Costa County Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2017-18 APPENDIX A Special Districts Budget Worksheet Entity: LL2 Zone 22 / Fund 2857 (SEABREEZE - BAY POINT AREA) Maximum assessment is:$290.00 / EDU FY 2017-18 -Assessments @ $290.00 / EDU 154.00 EDUs 154 Parcels FY 2016-17 6 month actuals/ 6 month projections FY 2017-18 Prop. Budget Fund Balance as of June 30 $17,524.10 $1,629.61 Revenues: Taxes and assessments $44,660.00 $44,660.00 Interfund Rev. Gov/Gov $0.00 $0.00 Earnings on Investment $0.00 $0.00 Total Revenue Available:$62,184.10 $46,289.61 Expenditures: Office Expense $0.00 $0.00 Publications & Legal Notices $0.00 $0.00 Interest on Notes & Warrants $0.00 $0.00 Tax & Assessment Fees ($380.81)($381.00) Interfund Exp $0.00 $0.00 Utilities - Water & Electricity ($17,548.72)($17,500.00) Other Special Departmental $0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (out of house, contractor)$0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (in house)($36,486.42)($20,000.00) Professional Services (Non-County Staff)($1,968.35)($871.28) Professional Services (County Staff)($4,170.19)($1,200.00) Playground Inspection $0.00 $0.00 Vandalism/Incidentals $0.00 $0.00 Capital Improvement Projects & Reserves: Operating Reserves (50% of Revenue)$0.00 ($6,337.33) Total Expenditures:($60,554.49)($46,289.61) Balance Forward to Ensuing Year $1,629.61 $0.00 apxA_1718budgets_fer(2017-05-17).xlsx - Z_22 A - 11 Francisco & Associates June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 532 Contra Costa County Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2017-18 APPENDIX A Special Districts Budget Worksheet Entity: LL2 Zone 27 / Fund 2855 (BETTENCOURT RANCH AND SOMERSET - DANVILLE AREA) Maximum Assessment is $150.00 / EDU FY 2017-18 -Assessments @ $150.00 / EDU 421.00 EDUs Subzone "A" FY 2017-18 -Assessments @ $105.68 / EDU Subzone "A" EDU's 150.00 EDUs FY 2016-17 6 month actuals/ 6 month projections FY 2017-18 Prop. Budget Fund Balance as of June 30 $3,364.48 ($76,618.78) Revenues: Taxes and assessments $79,002.00 $79,002.00 Interfund Rev. Gov/Gov $0.00 $0.00 Earnings on Investment $0.00 $0.00 Total Revenue Available:$82,366.48 $2,383.22 Expenditures: Office Expense $0.00 $0.00 Publications & Legal Notices $0.00 $0.00 Interest on Notes & Warrants $0.00 $0.00 Tax & Assessment Fees ($1,470.35)($735.35) Interfund Exp ($600.00)($600.00) Utilities - Water & Electricity ($38,034.00)($40,000.00) Other Special Departmental $0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (out of house, contractor)$0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (in house)($12,448.47)($20,000.00) Professional Services (Non-County Staff)($1,590.00)($1,541.26) Professional Services (County Staff)($4,025.24)($5,000.00) Playground Inspection $0.00 $0.00 Vandalism/Incidentals $0.00 $0.00 Facilities Maintenance ($817.20)($817.20) Installation of water meter & irrigation modifications ($100,000.00)($100,000.00) Capital Improvement Projects & Reserves: Operating Reserves (50% of Revenue)$0.00 $0.00 Total Expenditures:($158,985.26)($168,693.81) Balance Forward to Ensuing Year ($76,618.78)($166,310.59) apxA_1718budgets_fer(2017-05-17).xlsx - Z_27 A - 12 Francisco & Associates June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 533 Contra Costa County Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2017-18 APPENDIX A Special Districts Budget Worksheet Entity: LL2 Zone 35 / Fund 2881 (SANDY COVE SHOPPING CENTER - DISCOVERY BAY AREA) Maximum Assessment is $1,971.46 / Acre FY 2017-18 -Assessments @ $1,971.46 / Acre 13.92 Acres 9 Parcels FY 2016-17 6 month actuals/ 6 month projections FY 2017-18 Prop. Budget Fund Balance as of June 30 $223,809.53 $237,470.53 Revenues: Taxes and assessments $26,530.78 $27,442.68 Interfund Rev. Gov/Gov $0.00 $0.00 Earnings on Investment $151.97 $0.00 Total Revenue Available:$250,492.28 $264,913.21 Expenditures: Office Expense $0.00 $0.00 Publications & Legal Notices $0.00 $0.00 Interest on Notes & Warrants $0.00 $0.00 Tax & Assessment Fees ($257.65)($257.65) Interfund Exp ($1.00)($2.00) Communications ($592.86)($600.00) Utilities - Water & Electricity ($699.51)($871.84) Other Special Departmental $0.00 $0.00 Vehicle Expense ($912.00)($2,000.00) Grounds Maintenance - (out of house, contractor)($1,142.17)($6,100.00) Grounds Maintenance - (in house)$0.00 $0.00 Professional Services (Non-County Staff)($4,571.62)($8,531.16) Professional Services (County Staff)($4,844.94)($5,600.00) Playground Inspection $0.00 $0.00 Vandalism/Incidentals $0.00 $0.00 Capital Improvement Projects & Reserves: Pedestrian Bridge and Trail Improvements $0.00 ($227,229.22) Operating Reserves (50% of Revenue)$0.00 ($13,721.34) Total Expenditures:($13,021.75)($264,913.21) Balance Forward to Ensuing Year $237,470.53 $0.00 CPI Info. Date Actual CPI Increase Rate Feb-03 197.70 $1,434.92 Feb-14 248.62 2.45%$1,804.45 Feb-15 254.91 2.53%$1,850.14 Feb-16 262.60 3.02%$1,905.95 Feb-17 271.63 3.44%$1,971.46 apxA_1718budgets_fer(2017-05-17).xlsx - Z_35 A - 13 Francisco & Associates June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 534 Contra Costa County Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2017-18 APPENDIX A Special Districts Budget Worksheet Entity: LL2 Zone 36 / Fund 2852 (ALAMO BEAUTIFICATION - ALAMO AREA) Maximum assessment is:$9.36 / SFR Parcel FY 2017-18 -Assessments @ $9.36 / SFR Parcel FY 2017-18 -Assessments @ $4.68 / MFR Unit 5,382.25 EDUs 5,498 Parcels FY 2016-17 6 month actuals/ 6 month projections FY 2017-18 Prop. Budget Fund Balance as of June 30 $20,252.59 $31,185.07 Revenues: Taxes and assessments $50,377.84 $50,377.84 Interfund Rev. Gov/Gov $870.48 $870.48 Earnings on Investment $0.00 $0.00 Boulevard of Trees $0.00 $0.00 Total Revenue Available:$71,500.91 $82,433.39 Expenditures: Office Expense $0.00 $0.00 Publications & Legal Notices $0.00 $0.00 Interest on Notes & Warrants $0.00 $0.00 Tax & Assessment Fees ($4,922.76)($4,923.00) Interfund Exp $0.00 $0.00 Utilities - Water & Electricity ($1,693.12)($1,700.00) Other Special Departmental $0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (out of house, contractor)$0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (in house)($28,172.51)($30,000.00) Professional Services (Non-County Staff)($997.76)($982.83) Professional Services (County Staff)($4,529.69)($10,000.00) Playground Inspection $0.00 $0.00 Vandalism/Incidentals $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Capital Improvement Projects & Reserves: Streetscape Improvements $0.00 ($17,905.88) Operating Reserves (50% of Revenue)$0.00 ($16,921.68) Total Expenditures:($40,315.84)($82,433.39) Balance Forward to Ensuing Year $31,185.07 $0.00 apxA_1718budgets_fer(2017-05-17).xlsx - Z_36 A - 14 Francisco & Associates June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 535 Contra Costa County Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2017-18 APPENDIX A Special Districts Budget Worksheet Entity: LL2 Zone 37 / Fund 2853 (CLYDE - CLYDE AREA) Maximum assessment is:$41.76 / SFR Parcel FY 2017-18 -Assessments @ $41.76 / SFR Parcel FY 2017-18 -Assessments @ $20.88 / MFR Unit 278.59 EDUs 286 Parcels FY 2016-17 6 month actuals/ 6 month projections FY 2017-18 Prop. Budget Fund Balance as of June 30 $22,948.67 $6,744.95 Revenues: Taxes and assessments $11,717.44 $11,633.92 Interfund Rev. Gov/Gov $0.00 $0.00 Earnings on Investment $0.00 $0.00 Total Revenue Available:$34,666.11 $18,378.87 Expenditures: Office Expense $0.00 $0.00 Publications & Legal Notices $0.00 $0.00 Interest on Notes & Warrants $0.00 $0.00 Tax & Assessment Fees ($493.10)($494.00) Interfund Exp $0.00 $0.00 Utilities - Water & Electricity ($2,217.96)($3,000.00) Other Special Departmental $0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (out of house, contractor)$0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (in house)($4,494.91)($4,500.00) Grounds Maintenance - Special Request ($15,178.71)$0.00 Professional Services (Non-County Staff)($2,637.43)($228.60) Professional Services (County Staff)($2,399.05)($1,500.00) Reimbursements - Gov/Gov (County Staff)$0.00 $0.00 Playground Inspection ($500.00)($300.00) Vandalism/Incidentals $0.00 $0.00 Capital Improvement Projects & Reserves: Park Improvement Projects $0.00 ($2,539.31) Operating Reserves (50% of Revenue)$0.00 ($5,816.96) Total Expenditures:($27,921.16)($18,378.87) Balance Forward to Ensuing Year $6,744.95 $0.00 apxA_1718budgets_fer(2017-05-17).xlsx - Z_37 A - 15 Francisco & Associates June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 536 Contra Costa County Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2017-18 APPENDIX A Special Districts Budget Worksheet Entity: LL2 Zone 38 / Fund 2854 (RODEO - RODEO AREA) Maximum Assessment is $32.04 / EDU FY 2017-18 -Assessments Subzone A @ $32.04 / EDU FY 2017-18 -Assessments Subzone B @ $27.24 / EDU EDU's for Subzone A 1,681.61 EDUs EDU's for Subzone B 1,121.00 EDUs 2,556 Parcels FY 2016-17 6 month actuals/ 6 month projections FY 2017-18 Prop. Budget Fund Balance as of June 30 $9,682.70 $10,222.64 Revenues: Taxes and assessments $84,414.82 $84,414.82 Interfund Rev. Gov/Gov $0.00 $0.00 Earnings on Investment $0.00 $0.00 Total Revenue Available:$94,097.52 $94,637.46 Expenditures: Office Expense $0.00 $0.00 Trash Service $0.00 $0.00 Communications $0.00 $0.00 Publications & Legal Notices $0.00 $0.00 Interest on Notes & Warrants $0.00 $0.00 Tax & Assessment Fees ($2,422.69)($2,423.00) Interfund Exp $0.00 $0.00 Utilities - Water & Electricity ($8,664.06)($11,000.00) Other Special Departmental ($47.91)$0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (out of house, contractor)($16,560.00)($15,500.00) Grounds Maintenance - (in house)($13,250.51)($18,500.00) Professional Services (Non-County Staff)($8,865.07)($1,996.86) Professional Services (County Staff)($18,537.07)($19,000.00) DoIT Phone Exchange ($360.55)($408.00) Building Occupancy Cost ($14,800.36)($15,430.00) Print & Mail $0.00 $0.00 Playground Inspection ($366.66)($300.00) Vandalism/Incidentals $0.00 $0.00 Capital Improvement Projects & Reserves: Operating Reserves (50% of Revenue)$0.00 ($10,079.60) Total Expenditures:($83,874.88)($94,637.46) Balance Forward to Ensuing Year $10,222.64 $0.00 apxA_1718budgets_fer(2017-05-17).xlsx - Z_38 A - 16 Francisco & Associates June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 537 Contra Costa County Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2017-18 APPENDIX A Special Districts Budget Worksheet Entity: LL2 Zone 42 / Fund 2867 (CALIFORNIA SKYLINE - BAY POINT AREA) Maximum assessment is:$210.00 / EDU FY 2017-18 -Assessments @ $210.00 / EDU 343.00 EDUs 343 Parcels FY 2016-17 6 month actuals/ 6 month projections FY 2017-18 Prop. Budget Fund Balance as of June 30 $39,165.67 $45,429.49 Revenues: Taxes and assessments $72,030.00 $72,030.00 Interfund Rev. Gov/Gov $0.00 $0.00 Earnings on Investment $0.00 $0.00 Total Revenue Available:$111,195.67 $117,459.49 Expenditures: Office Expense $0.00 $0.00 Publications & Legal Notices $0.00 $0.00 Interest on Notes & Warrants $0.00 $0.00 Tax & Assessment Fees ($541.55)($542.00) Interfund Exp ($10.00)($21.00) Utilities - Water & Electricity ($13,473.46)($15,000.00) Other Special Departmental $0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (out of house, contractor)$0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (in house)($35,707.98)($50,000.00) Professional Services (Non-County Staff)($5,748.59)($7,165.24) Professional Services (County Staff)($2,822.60)($5,000.00) Playground Inspection $0.00 $0.00 Vandalism/Incidentals $0.00 ($1,500.00) Boeger Park Maintenance*($4,550.00)($4,550.00) Tradewinds Park Maintenance*($2,912.00)($2,912.00) Capital Improvement Projects & Reserves: Operating Reserves (50% of Revenue)$0.00 ($30,769.25) Total Expenditures:($65,766.18)($117,459.49) Balance Forward to Ensuing Year $45,429.49 $0.00 *Please Note: Per the June 26, 2012 JEPA between Contra Costa County and Ambrose Recreation & Park District, Ambrose Recreation & Park District is responsible for Boeger and Tradewinds Park. apxA_1718budgets_fer(2017-05-17).xlsx - Z_42 A - 17 Francisco & Associates June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 538 Contra Costa County Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2017-18 APPENDIX A Special Districts Budget Worksheet Entity: LL2 Zone 45 / Fund 2869 (ALAMO VILLAS - ALAMO AREA) Maximum assessment is:$120.00 / EDU FY 2017-18 -Assessments @ $120.00 / EDU 10.00 EDUs 10 Parcels FY 2016-17 6 month actuals/ 6 month projections FY 2017-18 Prop. Budget Fund Balance as of June 30 ($3,743.04)($3,425.34) Revenues: Taxes and assessments $1,200.00 $1,200.00 Interfund Rev. Gov/Gov $0.00 $0.00 Earnings on Investment $0.00 $0.00 Total Revenue Available:($2,543.04)($2,225.34) Expenditures: Office Expense $0.00 $0.00 Publications & Legal Notices $0.00 $0.00 Interest on Notes & Warrants $0.00 $0.00 Tax & Assessment Fees ($258.50)($259.00) Interfund Exp $0.00 $0.00 Utilities - Water & Electricity $0.00 $0.00 Other Special Departmental $0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (out of house, contractor)$0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (in house)($500.00)($500.00) Professional Services (Non-County Staff)($23.80)($23.41) Professional Services (County Staff)($100.00)($100.00) Playground Inspection $0.00 $0.00 Vandalism/Incidentals $0.00 $0.00 Capital Improvement Projects & Reserves: Operating Reserves (50% of Revenue)$0.00 $0.00 Total Expenditures:($882.30)($882.41) Balance Forward to Ensuing Year ($3,425.34)($3,107.75) apxA_1718budgets_fer(2017-05-17).xlsx - Z_45 A - 18 Francisco & Associates June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 539 Contra Costa County Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2017-18 APPENDIX A Special Districts Budget Worksheet Entity: LL2 Zone 48 / Fund 2872 (MRACK ROAD - DANVILLE AREA) Maximum assessment is:$490.00 / EDU FY 2017-18 -Assessments @ $490.00 / EDU 72.00 EDUs 72 Parcels FY 2016-17 6 month actuals/ 6 month projections FY 2017-18 Prop. Budget Fund Balance as of June 30 $29,440.52 $31,204.48 Revenues: Taxes and assessments $35,280.00 $35,280.00 Interfund Rev. Gov/Gov $0.00 $0.00 Earnings on Investment $0.00 $0.00 Total Revenue Available:$64,720.52 $66,484.48 Expenditures: Office Expense $0.00 $0.00 Publications & Legal Notices $0.00 $0.00 Interest on Notes & Warrants $0.00 $0.00 Tax & Assessment Fees ($311.20)($312.00) Interfund Exp ($10.00)($22.00) Utilities - Water & Electricity ($3,042.99)($3,500.00) Other Special Departmental $0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (out of house, contractor)$0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (in house)($28,198.77)($27,000.00) Professional Services (Non-County Staff)($699.72)($688.28) Professional Services (County Staff)($1,253.36)($2,000.00) Playground Inspection $0.00 $0.00 Vandalism/Incidentals $0.00 ($100.00) Frontage Improvement Study $0.00 $0.00 Capital Improvement Projects & Reserves: Frontage Irrigation Improvements $0.00 ($15,222.20) Operating Reserves (50% of Revenue)$0.00 ($17,640.00) Total Expenditures:($33,516.04)($66,484.48) Balance Forward to Ensuing Year $31,204.48 $0.00 apxA_1718budgets_fer(2017-05-17).xlsx - Z_48 A - 19 Francisco & Associates June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 540 Contra Costa County Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2017-18 APPENDIX A Special Districts Budget Worksheet Entity: LL2 Zone 54 / Fund 2876 (ALAMO COUNTRY - ALAMO AREA) Maximum assessment is:$386.62 / EDU FY 2017-18 -Assessments @ $386.62 / EDU 93.00 EDUs 93 Parcels FY 2016-17 6 month actuals/ 6 month projections FY 2017-18 Prop. Budget Fund Balance as of June 30 $25,067.76 $31,885.41 Revenues: Taxes and assessments $34,759.68 $35,955.66 Interfund Rev. Gov/Gov $0.00 $0.00 Earnings on Investment $0.00 $0.00 Total Revenue Available:$59,827.44 $67,841.07 Expenditures: Office Expense $0.00 $0.00 Publications & Legal Notices $0.00 $0.00 Interest on Notes & Warrants $0.00 $0.00 Tax & Assessment Fees ($329.05)($658.10) Interfund Exp ($870.48)($870.48) Utilities - Water & Electricity ($5,191.21)($10,000.00) Other Special Departmental $0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (out of house, contractor)$0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (in house)($17,039.06)($20,000.00) Professional Services (Non-County Staff)($689.43)($688.28) Professional Services (County Staff)($3,822.80)($4,000.00) Playground Inspection $0.00 $0.00 Vandalism/Incidentals $0.00 $0.00 Capital Improvement Projects & Reserves: Frontage Planting and Irrigation Improvements $0.00 ($10,717.47) Operating Reserves (50% of Revenue)$0.00 ($20,906.74) Total Expenditures:($27,942.03)($67,841.07) Balance Forward to Ensuing Year $31,885.41 $0.00 CPI Info. Date Actual CPI Increase Rate Jun-02 193.20 $275.00 Feb-14 248.62 2.45%$353.86 Feb-15 254.91 2.53%$362.82 Feb-16 262.60 3.02%$373.77 Feb-17 271.63 3.44%$386.62 apxA_1718budgets_fer(2017-05-17).xlsx - Z_54 A - 20 Francisco & Associates June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 541 Contra Costa County Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2017-18 APPENDIX A Special Districts Budget Worksheet Entity: LL2 Zone 57 / Fund 2877 (PACIFIC WATERWAYS - DISCOVERY BAY AREA) Maximum assessment is:$231.00 / EDU FY 2017-18 -Assessments @ $231.00 / EDU 380.00 EDUs 380 Parcels FY 2016-17 6 month actuals/ 6 month projections FY 2017-18 Prop. Budget Fund Balance as of June 30 ($2,128.30)$6,214.26 Revenues: Taxes and assessments $87,780.00 $87,780.00 Interfund Rev. Gov/Gov $0.00 $0.00 Earnings on Investment $0.00 $0.00 Total Revenue Available:$85,651.70 $93,994.26 Expenditures: Office Expense $0.00 $0.00 Publications & Legal Notices $0.00 $0.00 Interest on Notes & Warrants $0.00 $0.00 Tax & Assessment Fees ($573.00)($573.00) Interfund Exp $0.00 $0.00 Communications ($248.15)($265.00) Utilities - Water & Electricity ($15,132.41)($16,000.00) Other Special Departmental $0.00 $0.00 Vehicle Expense ($16,448.40)($15,000.00) Grounds Maintenance - (out of house, contractor)($5,492.68)($7,000.00) Grounds Maintenance - (in house)$0.00 $0.00 Professional Services (Non-County Staff)($36,584.03)($39,712.51) Professional Services (County Staff)($4,958.77)($5,000.00) Playground Inspection $0.00 $0.00 Vandalism/Incidentals $0.00 $0.00 Regatta Park Transfer $0.00 Regatta Park Improvement Study $0.00 $0.00 Regatta Park Tables, Drinking Fountain & Backstop Repair $0.00 $0.00 Capital Improvement Projects & Reserves: Operating Reserves (50% of Revenue)$0.00 ($10,443.75) Total Expenditures:($79,437.44)($93,994.26) Balance Forward to Ensuing Year $6,214.26 $0.00 apxA_1718budgets_fer(2017-05-17).xlsx - Z_57 A - 21 Francisco & Associates June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 542 Contra Costa County Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2017-18 APPENDIX A Special Districts Budget Worksheet Entity: LL2 Zone 61 / Fund 2833 (DISCOVERY BAY WEST - DISCOVERY BAY AREA) Maximum Assessment is $190.00 / EDU FY 2017-18 -Assessments @ $150.00 / EDU 1,765.50 EDUs 1,924 Parcels FY 2016-17 6 month actuals/ 6 month projections FY 2017-18 Prop. Budget $458,265.25 $112,561.25 $220,687.50 $264,825.00 $0.00 $0.00 $379.94 $0.00 $679,332.69 $377,386.25 $0.00 $0.00 ($3,575.29)($4,000.00) $0.00 $0.00 ($1,885.40)($1,885.40) ($2.00)($2.00) ($289.77)($300.00) ($28,303.30)($30,168.00) $0.00 $0.00 ($22,578.66)($24,000.00) ($10,714.15)($21,150.00) $0.00 $0.00 ($103,735.92)($104,305.42) ($28,954.88)($36,000.00) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 ($30,290.54)$0.00 ($336,441.53)$0.00 $0.00 ($23,735.90) $0.00 ($24,495.78) $0.00 ($107,343.75) ($566,771.44)($377,386.25) $112,561.25 $0.00 Subdivision Total Units Current Assessable Units Revenue Subdivision Total Units Current Assessable Units Revenue Village 1(7686)57 57.00 $8,550.00 Village 3 (8572)88 88.00 $13,200.00 Village 1 (12 unit remainder, Parcel I)1 6.00 $900.00 Village 3 (8577) - VSFR 1 0.50 $75.00 Village 1(8143)77 77.00 $11,550.00 Village 3 (8577) - SFR 109 109.00 $16,350.00 Village 1(8166)58 58.00 $8,700.00 Village 3 (8578)47 47.00 $7,050.00 Village 1(8167)71 71.00 $10,650.00 Village 3 (8579)92 92.00 $13,800.00 Village 2(8023)99 99.00 $14,850.00 Village 4(8580) - VSFR 8 4.00 $600.00 Village 2(8428)80 80.00 $12,000.00 Village 4(8580) -SFR 123 123.00 $18,450.00 Village 2(8429)77 77.00 $11,550.00 Village 4(8827) - SFR 137 137.00 $20,550.00 Village 2(8430)44 44.00 $6,600.00 Village 5(8828) - SFR 12 12.00 $1,800.00 Village 2(8431)50 50.00 $7,500.00 Village 5(8992) - VSFR 126 63.00 $9,450.00 Village 2(8432)55 55.00 $8,250.00 Village 5(8992) - SFR 22 22.00 $3,300.00 Village 2(8433)49 49.00 $7,350.00 Village 5(8993) - VSFR 145 72.50 $10,875.00 Village 2 Senior Apartments 0.00 $0.00 Village 5(8993) -SFR 0 0.00 $0.00 Village 3(8570)72 72.00 $10,800.00 Village 5(9067) - VSFR 47 23.50 $3,525.00 Village 3 (8571)97 97.00 $14,550.00 Village 5(9067) -SFR 0 0.00 $0.00 Village 5(9322) - SFR 80 80.00 $12,000.00 Total 1,924 1,765.50 $264,825.00 Frontage Irrigation/Planting Improvements Operating Reserves (50% of Revenue) Slifer Park Improvements Balance Forward to Ensuing Year Total Expenditures: Professional Services (County Staff) Playground Inspection Office Expense Publications & Legal Notices Interest on Notes & Warrants Tax & Assessment Fees Interfund Exp Vandalism/Incidentals Slifer Park Transfer Solar Lights Slifer Park Shade Structure Total Revenue Available: Expenditures: Capital Improvement Projects & Reserves: Other Special Departmental Vehicle Expense Grounds Maintenance - (out of house, contractor) Grounds Maintenance - (in house) Communications Utilities - Water & Electricity Professional Services (Non-County Staff) Earnings on Investment Fund Balance as of June 30 Revenues: Taxes and assessments Interfund Rev. Gov/Gov apxA_1718budgets_fer(2017-05-17).xlsx - Z_61 A - 22 Francisco & Associates June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 543 Contra Costa County Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2017-18 APPENDIX A Special Districts Budget Worksheet Entity: LL2 Zone 63 / Fund 2815 (PARKWAY ESTATES - NORTH RICHMOND AREA) Maximum assessment is:$230.00 / EDU FY 2017-18 -Assessments @ $230.00 / EDU 87.00 EDUs 87 Parcels FY 2016-17 6 month actuals/ 6 month projections FY 2017-18 Prop. Budget Fund Balance as of June 30 $53,253.62 $54,567.83 Revenues: Taxes and assessments $20,010.00 $20,010.00 Interfund Rev. Gov/Gov $0.00 $0.00 Earnings on Investment $0.00 $0.00 Total Revenue Available:$73,263.62 $74,577.83 Expenditures: Office Expense $0.00 $0.00 Publications & Legal Notices $0.00 $0.00 Interest on Notes & Warrants $0.00 $0.00 Tax & Assessment Fees ($323.95)($324.00) Interfund Exp ($10.00)($21.00) Utilities - Water & Electricity ($965.44)($1,000.00) Other Special Departmental $0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (out of house, contractor)$0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (in house)($15,847.64)($13,000.00) Professional Services (Non-County Staff)($396.86)($390.38) Professional Services (County Staff)($1,151.90)($1,500.00) Playground Inspection $0.00 ($500.00) Vandalism/Incidentals $0.00 ($1,000.00) Playground Structure & Durability Study $0.00 $0.00 Capital Improvement Projects & Reserves: Landscaping and Playground Improvements $0.00 ($46,837.45) Operating Reserves (50% of Revenue)$0.00 ($10,005.00) Total Expenditures:($18,695.79)($74,577.83) Balance Forward to Ensuing Year $54,567.83 $0.00 apxA_1718budgets_fer(2017-05-17).xlsx - Z_63 A - 23 Francisco & Associates June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 544 Contra Costa County Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2017-18 APPENDIX A Special Districts Budget Worksheet Entity: LL2 Zone 64 / Fund 2864 (CALIFORNIA REFLECTIONS - PINOLE AREA) Maximum assessment is:$300.00 / EDU FY 2017-18 -Assessments @ $250.00 / EDU 31.00 EDUs 31 Parcels FY 2016-17 6 month actuals/ 6 month projections FY 2017-18 Prop. Budget Fund Balance as of June 30 $61,004.77 $60,231.25 Revenues: Taxes and assessments $7,750.00 $7,750.00 Interfund Rev. Gov/Gov $0.00 $0.00 Earnings on Investment $75.99 $0.00 Total Revenue Available:$68,830.76 $67,981.25 Expenditures: Office Expense $0.00 $0.00 Publications & Legal Notices $0.00 $0.00 Interest on Notes & Warrants $0.00 $0.00 Tax & Assessment Fees ($276.35)($277.00) Interfund Exp ($1.00)($1.00) Utilities - Water & Electricity ($736.88)($1,000.00) Other Special Departmental $0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (out of house, contractor)$0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (in house)($6,805.31)($7,000.00) Professional Services (Non-County Staff)($153.71)($151.20) Professional Services (County Staff)($626.26)($1,000.00) Playground Inspection $0.00 $0.00 Vandalism/Incidentals $0.00 $0.00 Frontage Improvement Study $0.00 $0.00 Capital Improvement Projects & Reserves: Frontage Landscaping and Irrigation Improvements $0.00 ($54,677.05) Operating Reserves (50% of Revenue)$0.00 ($3,875.00) Total Expenditures:($8,599.51)($67,981.25) Balance Forward to Ensuing Year $60,231.25 $0.00 apxA_1718budgets_fer(2017-05-17).xlsx - Z_64 A - 24 Francisco & Associates June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 545 Contra Costa County Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2017-18 APPENDIX A Special Districts Budget Worksheet Entity: LL2 Zone 68 / Fund 2882 (WENDT RANCH - DANVILLE AREA) Maximum assessment is:$300.00 / EDU FY 2017-18 -Assessments @ $5.00 / EDU 125.00 EDUs 125 Parcels FY 2016-17 6 month actuals/ 6 month projections FY 2017-18 Prop. Budget Fund Balance as of June 30 $11,775.81 $11,808.86 Revenues: Taxes and assessments $625.00 $625.00 Interfund Rev. Gov/Gov $0.00 $0.00 Earnings on Investment $0.00 $0.00 Total Revenue Available:$12,400.81 $12,433.86 Expenditures: Office Expense $0.00 $0.00 Publications & Legal Notices $0.00 $0.00 Interest on Notes & Warrants $0.00 $0.00 Tax & Assessment Fees ($356.25)($357.00) Interfund Exp ($2.00)($1.00) Utilities - Water & Electricity $0.00 $0.00 Other Special Departmental $0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (out of house, contractor)$0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (in house)$0.00 ($1,000.00) Professional Services (Non-County Staff)($12.40)($12.19) Professional Services (County Staff)($221.30)($1,000.00) Playground Inspection $0.00 $0.00 Vandalism/Incidentals $0.00 ($500.00) Service Review $0.00 ($9,251.17) Capital Improvement Projects & Reserves: Operating Reserves (50% of Revenue)$0.00 ($312.50) Total Expenditures:($591.95)($12,433.86) Balance Forward to Ensuing Year $11,808.86 $0.00 *Please Note: There are parks and landscaping located in the interior sections of this Zone which are planned to be owned and maintained by a Homeowners Association and therefore the maximum assessment rate did not include these areas of maintenance and they are not the responsibility of LL- 2. apxA_1718budgets_fer(2017-05-17).xlsx - Z_68 A - 25 Francisco & Associates June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 546 Contra Costa County Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2017-18 APPENDIX A Special Districts Budget Worksheet Entity: LL2 Zone 69 / Fund 2871 (ALAMO CREEK - DANVILLE AREA) Maximum assessment is:$1,381.07 / EDU FY 2017-18 -Assessments @ $5.00 / EDU 756.32 EDUs 810 Parcels FY 2016-17 6 month actuals/ 6 month projections FY 2017-18 Prop. Budget Fund Balance as of June 30 $48,047.53 $50,717.03 Revenues: Taxes and assessments $3,781.60 $3,781.60 Interfund Rev. Gov/Gov $0.00 $0.00 Earnings on Investment $0.00 $0.00 Total Revenue Available:$51,829.13 $54,498.63 Expenditures: Office Expense $0.00 $0.00 Publications & Legal Notices $0.00 $0.00 Interest on Notes & Warrants $0.00 $0.00 Tax & Assessment Fees ($933.10)($934.00) Interfund Exp ($10.00)($2.00) Utilities - Water & Electricity $0.00 $0.00 Other Special Departmental $0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (out of house, contractor)$0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (in house)$0.00 $0.00 Professional Services (Non-County Staff)($69.00)($73.78) Professional Services (County Staff)($100.00)($700.00) Playground Inspection $0.00 $0.00 Vandalism/Incidentals $0.00 $0.00 Service Review $0.00 ($50,898.05) Capital Improvement Projects & Reserves: Operating Reserves (50% of Revenue)$0.00 ($1,890.80) Total Expenditures:($1,112.10)($54,498.63) Balance Forward to Ensuing Year $50,717.03 $0.00 CPI Info. Date Actual CPI Increase Rate Jun-06 209.10 $1,063.16 Feb-14 248.62 2.45%$1,264.07 Feb-15 254.91 2.53%$1,296.08 Feb-16 262.60 3.02%$1,335.18 Feb-17 271.63 3.44%$1,381.07 *Please Note: There are parks and landscaping located in the interior sections of this Zone, which are currently owned and maintained by a Homeowners Association. However, the maximum assessment rate, when established, included these interior sections as being maintained and operated by LL-2. Therefore if the Homeowner’s Association fails to maintain these interior sections to County standards, the County may take over maintenance of these areas and increase the assessment to it’s maximum allowable rate. apxA_1718budgets_fer(2017-05-17).xlsx - Z_69 A - 26 Francisco & Associates June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 547 Contra Costa County Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2017-18 APPENDIX A Special Districts Budget Worksheet Entity: LL2 Zone 70 / Fund 2885 (INTERVENING PROPERTIES - DANVILLE AREA) Maximum assessment is:$425.28 / EDU FY 2017-18 -Assessments @ $175.00 / EDU 426.00 EDUs 379 Parcels FY 2016-17 6 month actuals/ 6 month projections FY 2017-18 Prop. Budget Fund Balance as of June 30 $95,052.38 $46,559.63 Revenues: Taxes and assessments $59,640.00 $74,550.00 Interfund Rev. Gov/Gov $0.00 $0.00 Earnings on Investment $75.99 $0.00 Total Revenue Available:$154,768.37 $121,109.63 Expenditures: Office Expense $0.00 $0.00 Publications & Legal Notices $0.00 $0.00 Interest on Notes & Warrants $0.00 $0.00 Tax & Assessment Fees ($572.15)($573.00) Interfund Exp ($11.00)($21.00) Utilities - Water & Electricity ($8,745.26)($10,000.00) Other Special Departmental $0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (out of house, contractor)$0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (in house)($24,869.46)($40,000.00) Professional Services (Non-County Staff)($1,182.85)($1,163.53) Professional Services (County Staff)($2,828.02)($3,000.00) Playground Inspection $0.00 $0.00 Vandalism/Incidentals $0.00 $0.00 Capital Improvement Projects & Reserves: Median/Frontage Improvements ($70,000.00)($36,532.10) Operating Reserves (50% of Revenue)$0.00 ($29,820.00) Total Expenditures:($108,208.74)($121,109.63) Balance Forward to Ensuing Year $46,559.63 $0.00 CPI Info. Date Actual CPI Increase Rate Jun-05 201.20 $315.00 Feb-14 248.62 2.45%$389.25 Feb-15 254.91 2.53%$399.11 Feb-16 262.60 3.02%$411.15 Feb-17 271.63 3.44%$425.28 *Please Note: There are parks and landscaping located in the interior sections of this Zone which are planned to be owned and maintained by a Homeowners Association and therefore the maximum assessment rate did not include these areas of maintenance and they are not the responsibility of LL- 2. apxA_1718budgets_fer(2017-05-17).xlsx - Z_70 A - 27 Francisco & Associates June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 548 Contra Costa County Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2017-18 APPENDIX A Special Districts Budget Worksheet Entity: LL2 Zone 71 / Fund 2886 (DIABLO VISTA BALLFIELDS - DANVILLE AREA) Maximum assessment is:$108.01 / EDU FY 2017-18 -Assessments @ $108.01 / EDU 1,039.50 EDUs 1,059 Parcels FY 2016-17 6 month actuals/ 6 month projections FY 2017-18 Prop. Budget Fund Balance as of June 30 $5,634.57 $5,105.51 Revenues: Taxes and assessments $108,542.62 $112,266.80 Interfund Rev. Gov/Gov $0.00 $0.00 Earnings on Investment $0.00 $0.00 Total Revenue Available:$114,177.19 $117,372.31 Expenditures: Office Expense $0.00 $0.00 Publications & Legal Notices $0.00 $0.00 Interest on Notes & Warrants $0.00 $0.00 Tax & Assessment Fees ($1,144.75)($1,145.00) Interfund Exp ($1.00)($1.00) Contribution to SRVUSD ($103,345.26)($105,929.00) Utilities - Water & Electricity $0.00 $0.00 Other Special Departmental $0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (out of house, contractor)$0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (in house)$0.00 $0.00 Professional Services (Non-County Staff)($2,027.51)($2,173.08) Professional Services (County Staff)($2,553.16)($2,736.47) Playground Inspection $0.00 $0.00 Vandalism/Incidentals $0.00 $0.00 Capital Improvement Projects & Reserves: Operating Reserves (50% of Revenue)$0.00 ($5,387.76) Total Expenditures:($109,071.68)($117,372.31) Balance Forward to Ensuing Year $5,105.51 $0.00 CPI Info. Date Actual CPI Increase Rate Jun-05 201.20 $80.00 Feb-14 248.62 2.45%$98.86 Feb-15 254.91 2.53%$101.36 Feb-16 262.60 3.02%$104.42 Feb-17 271.63 3.44%$108.01 *Please Note: Per the December 15, 2009 Joint Exercise Powers Agreement between the Town of Danville, San Ramon Valley Unified School District (SRVUSD) and Contra Costa County, SRVUSD is responsible for the maintenance of this area. Per the January 27, 2004 Settlement Agreement, all revenue (with the exception of Administration Costs) will be transferred to the entity responsible for the actual maintenance of the Ballfields. apxA_1718budgets_fer(2017-05-17).xlsx - Z_71 A - 28 Francisco & Associates June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 549 Contra Costa County Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2017-18 APPENDIX A Special Districts Budget Worksheet Entity: LL2 Zone 74 / Fund 2875 (BELLA FLORA - RICHMOND AREA) Maximum assessment is:$714.48 / EDU FY 2017-18 -Assessments @ $340.00 / EDU 178.00 EDUs 176 Parcels FY 2016-17 6 month actuals/ 6 month projections FY 2017-18 Prop. Budget Fund Balance as of June 30 $220,762.63 $228,137.24 Revenues: Taxes and assessments $60,520.00 $60,520.00 Interfund Rev. Gov/Gov $0.00 $0.00 Earnings on Investment $151.98 $0.00 Total Revenue Available:$281,434.61 $288,657.24 Expenditures: Office Expense $0.00 $0.00 Publications & Legal Notices $0.00 $0.00 Interest on Notes & Warrants $0.00 $0.00 Tax & Assessment Fees ($399.60)($399.60) Interfund Exp ($1.00)($4.00) Utilities - Water & Electricity ($5,520.94)($5,000.00) Other Special Departmental $0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (out of house, contractor)$0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (in house)($33,538.70)($35,000.00) Professional Services (Non-County Staff)($1,200.31)($1,180.69) Professional Services (County Staff)($4,770.15)($5,000.00) Playground Inspection ($366.67)($300.00) Vandalism/Incidentals $0.00 ($1,000.00) Parks, Trails, and Landscape Facilities Improvement Study $0.00 $0.00 Capital Improvement Projects & Reserves: Frontage Planting, Irrigation and Park Improvements ($7,500.00)($210,512.95) Operating Reserves (50% of Revenue)$0.00 ($30,260.00) Total Expenditures:($53,297.37)($288,657.24) Balance Forward to Ensuing Year $228,137.24 $0.00 CPI Info. Date Actual CPI Increase Rate Jun-06 209.10 $550.00 Feb-14 248.62 2.45%$653.95 Feb-15 254.91 2.53%$670.51 Feb-16 262.60 3.02%$690.74 Feb-17 271.63 3.44%$714.48 Land Use Type No. of Parcels EDU Rate FY17-18 No. of EDU's annex-FY07-08 SFR - Sub 9293 (old 8938)95 1.00 5.00 annex-FY07-08 Townhomes - Sub 9293 (old 8938)120 0.75 0.00 annex-FY07-08 Condominiums - Sub 9293 (old 8938)140 0.75 0.00 existing SFR - Sub 8755 173 1.00 173.00 528 178.00 *Please Note: There are parks and landscaping located in the interior of Subdivision 8938 which are planned to be owned and maintained by a Homeowners Association and therefore the maximum assessment rate did not include these areas of maintenance and they are not the responsibility of LL-2. apxA_1718budgets_fer(2017-05-17).xlsx - Z_74 A - 29 Francisco & Associates June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 550 Contra Costa County Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2017-18 APPENDIX A Special Districts Budget Worksheet Entity: LL2 Zone 75 / Fund 2889 (BELMONT TERRACE - PACHECO AREA) Maximum assessment is:$330.08 / EDU FY 2017-18 -Assessments @ $5.00 / EDU 164.75 EDUs 219 Parcels FY 2016-17 6 month actuals/ 6 month projections FY 2017-18 Prop. Budget Fund Balance as of June 30 $6,965.76 $7,323.26 Revenues: Taxes and assessments $933.72 $821.58 Interfund Rev. Gov/Gov $0.00 $0.00 Earnings on Investment $0.00 $0.00 Total Revenue Available:$7,899.48 $8,144.84 Expenditures: Office Expense $0.00 $0.00 Publications & Legal Notices $0.00 $0.00 Interest on Notes & Warrants $0.00 $0.00 Tax & Assessment Fees ($436.15)($437.00) Interfund Exp ($1.00)($1.00) Utilities - Water & Electricity $0.00 $0.00 Other Special Departmental $0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (out of house, contractor)$0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (in house)$0.00 $0.00 Professional Services (Non-County Staff)($17.29)($18.22) Professional Services (County Staff)($121.78)($500.00) Playground Inspection $0.00 $0.00 Vandalism/Incidentals $0.00 $0.00 Service Review $0.00 ($6,833.90) Capital Improvement Projects & Reserves: Operating Reserves (50% of Revenue)$0.00 ($354.72) Total Expenditures:($576.22)($8,144.84) Balance Forward to Ensuing Year $7,323.26 $0.00 CPI Info. Date Actual CPI Increase Rate Jun-06 209.10 $254.11 Feb-14 248.62 2.45%$302.12 Feb-15 254.91 2.53%$309.77 Feb-16 262.60 3.02%$319.11 Feb-17 271.63 3.44%$330.08 Subdivision-Landuse Total Units EDU Rate FY17-18 No. of EDU's existing 8984 Lots - Courtyard 128 0.75 96.00 annex FY07-08 8967 Lots - Courtyard 89 0.75 66.75 annex FY07-08 Commercial 1 1.00 1.00 218 163.75 *Please Note: There are parks and landscaping located in the interior of Subdivisions 8967 and 8984 which are planned to be owned and maintained by a Homeowners Association and therefore the maximum assessment rate did not include these areas of maintenance and they are not the responsibility of LL-2. apxA_1718budgets_fer(2017-05-17).xlsx - Z_75 A - 30 Francisco & Associates June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 551 PACIFICA AVE KEVIN DR PAMELA DRKIM STGREGORY DR WELDON STVI R G I L S TANCHOR DRTINA STSTEELE DRLYNBROOK STLI S A A N N S T SHARON PLNA P A C T PAMELA CTCHANDLER CIRSTEELE CTHARVEY WYDESANIE CIR SAN JOAQUIN CTKEVIN DRBLAINE CT CAMINO ANDRES DANIELLE PL RHEA CTBRADFORD STMICHAEL PLKINGS CTANCHOR CTCL I F F O R D C TLAURA ANN CTVI R G I L C T KENNETHCTSHELLIE CTRIVERSIDE CTSHARON CT PORT CHICAGO HWYC O N N I E C T SHARON DR WILLOW PASS RD Assessment DiagramContra Costa County LL-2Zones 1, 2, & 4 LYNBROOKPARK ± N:\Contra\FY14-15\LL-2\Diagrams\Zone1,2,&4.pdf (Last Update 04-14-14 SA)400 0 400 800200Feet 1 2 3 4 5 Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 4LEGEND Indicates Maintenance Area fromPart A in Engineer's Reportte Frontage/Median Landscaping Open Space Trails Parks June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 552 ALVES LNMEDANOS AVE WINTERBROOK DR SU M M E R F I E L D D RPUEBLO AVE FALLRIVERDRGERALD CTAssessment DiagramContra Costa County LL-2Zone 3 HICKORYMEADOWSPARK ± N:\Contra\FY14-15\LL-2\Diagrams\Zone 3.pdf (Last Update 04-14-14 SA)150 0 150 30075Feet 1 LEGEND Indicates Maintenance Area fromPart A in Engineer's Reportte Frontage/Median Landscaping Open Space Trails Parks June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 553 CENTER AVE MARSH DRHIGH STGLACIER DRTEMPLE DRBURNETT AVERAYMOND DRASPEN DRSALLY RIDE DROLYMPIC DR FLAME DRSPRING LAKE DR BROWN DR HIDDEN LAKES DRM I N A R E T D R FIRST AVEMONO DRADA DRSCOTTSDALE RDREDWOOD DRFREDA DR A R C A D I A P L B R Y C E D R SHASTA DR PINNACLE DR LASSEN DRPLATT D R FLA M I N G O A K D R ELDER DRGOLF CLU B W Y ARGENTA DRSWEETWATER DR RILEY DR CHIL P A N C I N G O P K W Y OPHIR CT CAROLOS DR RA I N I E R D R TOWERS DR LAKE CTKENTF IELD CTCROSBY CT PATRICK DR T R I N I T Y P L DEODAR DRTHIRD AVE S LAKE VILLA CT LAKE OAK S CT QUIET LAKE PL JIB CTCHRISTEN DR OAK GLEN CIRBEGONIA CTSPAR CTSOUTH BUCHANAN CIRKNOLLWOOD DRYELLOW STONE DR JEANNE CIRTEMPLE CT GLACIER CT BENTLEY CT OLYMPIC CT LAKE MEADOW CIRSHADOWOOD DRBENEDIC T C T FIFTH AVE S NORTH BUCHANAN CIRSCARLET OAK CTSEQUOIA CTLAVA CTGLOUCESTER LNGARDENIA CTEAGLE L A K E C T HIDDEN LAKES CT FOURTH AVE S CAMELBACK CT MOBILE MANOR PARK CIRRUBICON CTSECOND AVE SSTILLCREEK CTTOPSAIL CTEASTERCT BROWN CTLOST L A K E P L L Y L E C T MUIR RD C STSECOND AVE DEERWOOD DR FIRST AVE WILLOW STRAMP ARNOLD DR BLACKWOOD DRFIRST AVESEQUOIA DRIRONWOOD DRP A C H E C O B L V DTEMPLE DRAssessment DiagramContra Costa County LL-2Zone 5 N:\Contra\FY15-16\LL-2\Diagrams\Zone 5.pdf (Last Update 04-16-15 CC)900 0 900 1,800450Feet 1 2 LEGEND Indicates Maintenance Area fromPart A in Engineer's Reportte Frontage/Median Landscaping Open Space Trails Parks 1 Creek June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 554 TREAT BLVD C H E R R Y L N SUNNYVALE AVE COGGINS DRJONES ROADLAS JUNTAS WAY BUSKIRK AVESUN VALLEY DR WAYNE CTJILLIAN CTS H E P P A R D R DBRIARWOOD WAYELMWOOD DRGOBLE WAY DEL HOMBRE LNCALLE NOGALESSHEPPARD CTELMWOOD CTOAK PARK BLVD O A K R D COGGINS DR OAK RDBIRCH DRAssessment DiagramContra Costa County LL-2Zone 7 N:\Contra\FY16-17\LL-2\Diagrams\Zone 7.pdf (Last Update 05-12-16 SA)400 0 400 800200Feet FOXCREEKPARK WALDENGREENAREA 2 LEGEND Indicates Maintenance Area fromPart A in Engineer's Reportte Frontage/Median Landscaping Open Space Trails Parks 3 WALDENGREENAREA 1 PedestrianBridge June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 555 EVORA RD POMO ST EVORA RD WATERVIEW PL SAND POINTE LN SANDY COVE LN SKYHARBOUR L N POMO CT R A P A L L O L N BEAULIEU DR Assessment DiagramContra Costa County LL-2Zone 10 VIEWPOINTEPARK ± N:\Contra\FY14-15\LL-2\Diagrams\Zone 10.pdf (Last Update 04-14-14 SA)200 0 200 400100Feet 5 LEGEND Indicates Maintenance Area fromPart A in Engineer's Reportte Frontage/Median Landscaping Open Space Trails Parks 2 4 3 1 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 556 MADELINE RDFRANCES RDSAN PABLO AVEZANDRA CT SARGENT AVEMO N T A L V I N D R K A Y R D CR E S T W O O D DR Assessment DiagramContra Costa County LL-2Zone 11 ± N:\Contra\FY16-17\LL-2\Diagrams\Zone 11.pdf (Last Update 03-28-16 SA)200 0 200 400100Feet LEGEND Indicates Maintenance Area fromPart A in Engineer's Reportte Frontage/Median Landscaping Open Space Trails Parks 1 2 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 557 BLACKHAWK MEADOW DRMANSFIELD DRDEER TRAIL DR HANSEN LNCHE S I R E C I R FLEETWOOD RD GR E E N M E A D O W D RBOURN E L N BOURNE CT COTTONWOOD DRMRACK RDF R E E S I A C TCHESHIRE CTKNOLLVIEW DR GOLDEN OAK CT OAKGATE DRCOUNTRY CLUB P L FEAT H E R R I V E R B U C K I N G H A M P L SWEET WATER DRDE E R T R A I L C T CHESTERFIELD LN SNOWDON PL STONEYBROOK CTCHATHAMTER M A N S F I E L D D R MARIGOLD ST LAURELGLEN CTSILVER MEADOW CT COOLSPRING CTCREEKPOINT CT KNOLLWOOD CTSUN TREE CT GOLD LAKE CT DEER TRAIL LN SNOW MOUNTAIN CT DEEPCREEK CTCRYST A L S P R I N G S C T CL E A R L A K E S TSPRING WATER STWALNUT CREEK CT KNOLLS CREEK DRHONEY LAKE CT COUNTRY CLUB TER SHADOW CREEK CTWAKEFIELD CTSWEET WATER CT DAIS Y C T CAMINO TA S S A J A R A CAMINO TASSAJARA Assessment DiagramContra Costa County LL-2Zone 17 N:\Contra\FY16-17\LL-2\Diagrams\Zone 17.pdf (Last Update 03-28-16 SA)600 0 600 1,200300Feet LEGEND Indicates Maintenance Area fromPart A in Engineer's Reportte Frontage/Median Landscaping Open Space Trails Parks 1 ±June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 558 P A C H E C O B L V DTEMPLE DRAssessment DiagramContra Costa County LL-2Zone 18 N:\Contra\FY14-15\LL-2\Diagrams\Zone 18.pdf (Last Update 04-14-14 SA)50 0 50 10025Feet LEGEND Indicates Maintenance Area fromPart A in Engineer's Reportte Frontage/Median Landscaping Open Space Trails Parks 1 ± 2 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 559 DONEGAL WAY HIDDEN POND RDSUNR I S E R I D G E D R CALLE V E R DE PE B B L E B E A C H L O O P R E L I E Z V A L L E Y R D SIL V E R H I L L C T HIDDEN POND CT N O R T H P O N D C T SILVERHILL WAYOAK V I S T A C T Assessment DiagramContra Costa County LL-2Zone 19 N:\Contra\FY14-15\LL-2\Diagrams\Zone 19.pdf (Last Update 04-14-14 SA)400 0 400 800200Feet LEGEND Indicates Maintenance Area fromPart A in Engineer's Reportte Frontage/Median Landscaping Open Space Trails Parks ± 1 2 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 560 CENTRAL A V E COLUSA AVEE L M S T LA K E DR E V E R E T T S T N O R V E L L S T TERRACE DRBALRA DRMOESER LN FAIRMOUN T A V E CARMEL AVE HI G H G A T E R D RICHMOND ST PO M O N A A V E PU R D U E A V E RAMONA AVE BELOIT AVE CLAYTON AVECANYON DRASHBURY AVE B O N N I E D R Y A LE A VEFRANCISCAN WAYSAN CARLOS AVEKENYON AVE L AW R E N C E S T AV I S D R GALVIN DRARLINGTON AVEAMHERST AVEYOSEMITE AVE KINGSTO N R D CURRY AVEALBERMARLE ST WARD AVE S TA N FO RD AV E H I G H L A N D B L V DANSON WAYSEA V IEW DRALBERMALE STWINDSOR AVEL E N O X R DSTOCKTON AVECOWPER AVEVILLAGE DRSHEVLIN DRKERR AVESTRATFOR D R D OAK VIEW A V E WELLESLEY AVECAMBRIDG E AV EGELSTON PLAR D M O R E R DEDWIN DRCOLGA TE AVE R I V E R A S T WA L D O A V E AVON RDOCEAN VIEW AVEWILLAMETTE AVE LOS A L T O S D RJESSEN CTB A Y T R E E L N LIBERTY STEUREKA AVEYORK AVESEAVIEW PL RU G B Y A V E BERKELEY PARK BLVDROCKWAY A V E ARLMONT DROBERLIN AVEADAMS STERROL DRC A B R I L L O S T NORWOOD AVEG A R D E N D R S H E L V I N D R LEVISTON AVEARLINGTON CTAVIL A P L CO L UMB I A A V E LA W S O N D R PARL WAY WALDO LN LAM C T BEVERLY RDLA W S O N R D KAINS AVEROBERTA DRHOTCHKISS AVEEDGECRO F T R D ELDRIDGE CT VALLEY RD YALE C IR KENYON A V KENILWORTH DR PARKSI D E C T PLATEAU DRARLINGTON LNSAINT ALBANS RDM I D C R E S T W Y SUSAN AVE L E X I N G T O N A V EA G L E H I L L R D N O R V E L L C T ARLMONTPU R D U E A V E N U E RICARD O CT BEVERLY CT PRINCETO N A V E DEWEY PLPOMONA CTL AW R E N C E C T OCEAN V IEW AVE BALRA DR STOCKTON AVE HOTCHKISS AVESEA VIEW DRAR L I N G T O N B L V D KE N S I N G T O N C T CON T R A C O S T A D R RINCON RDCOVENTRY RDB A L R A D R SEAVIEW DRSEAVIEW DREUREKA AVEEUREKA A V E EUREKA A V E LINCOLN A V E POMONA AVE LYNN AVE O A K S T E V E R E T T S T O A K S T S A N T A C L A R A S T BERKELEY PARK BLVDHI G H L A N D B L V D EUREKA A V E SUNSET DRSEAV I EW DR LINCOLN A V E L I B E R T Y S T SEAVIEW DRR I C H M O N D S T WILLOW S T TR IN I TY A VE A S H B U R Y A V E GRIZZLY PEAK BLVDERROL DR LASSEN S T ADAMS STCOVENTRY RDLEXINGTON AVEASHBURY AVE LEXINGTON RD WILLOW ST Assessment DiagramContra Costa County LL-2Zone 21 N:\Contra\FY16-17\LL-2\Diagrams\Zone 21.pdf (Last Update 03-28-16 SA)1,000 0 1,000 2,000500Feet ± 3 2 1 LEGEND Indicates Maintenance Area fromPart A in Engineer's Reportte Frontage/Median Landscaping Open Space Trails Parks 4 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 561 Assessment DiagramContra Costa County LL-2Zone 22 3 Parcel A 2 4 6 Fence 5 1 ± LEGEND Indicates Maintenance Area fromPart A in Engineer's Reportte Frontage/Median Landscaping Open Space Trails Parks N:\Contra\FY16-17\LL-2\Diagrams\Zone 22.pdf (Last Update 03-28-16 SA)250 0 250 500125Feet June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 562 MANSFIELD DRSUGAR MA P L E D R JAS M I N E W YRASSANI DRSILVER MAPLE DRCONEJO DRCHE S I R E C I R NO T T I N G H AM D R FLEETWOOD RD YORKSHIRE PL F R E E S I A C TCHESHIRE CTTENBY TER GRIMSBY LNWESTMINSTER PL SHEFFIELD CIRB U C K I N G H A M P L TROWBRIDGE WAY CO V E N T R Y P L BLACKHAWK PLAZA CIR CHESTERFIELD LN SNOWDON PL CHATHAMTER TRENT CT M A N S F I E L D D R MARIGOLD ST JONATHAN RIDGE DRHASKINS RANCH CIRNOTTINGHAM PLLAKEFIELD CT JASMINE CTNORFOLK PLWALES CT SWAN ST FALCON ST PELICAN ST STARLING STBUCKINGHAM DRDAIS Y C T PHOENIX S T POR T O L A D R CAMINO TASSAJARA Assessment DiagramContra Costa County LL-2Zone 27 N:\Contra\FY16-17\LL-2\Diagrams\Zone 27.pdf (Last Update 03-17-17 SA)600 0 600 1,200300Feet 1 2LEGEND Indicates Maintenance Area fromPart A in Engineer's Reportte Frontage/Median Landscaping Open Space Trails Parks BenefitZone 27 BenefitZone 27A * Improvements include landscape between the sidewalk and the curb on Camino Tassajara & medians - slopes are HOA maintained 1 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 563 BIXLER RDREGATTA DRIVE FOGHORN WAY NEWPORT CT PIER POINTMARSH CREEK RD CAPSTAN PLPORTHOLE DRYACHT CTCATAMARAN CT HALYARD WAYNEWPORT PL SSHELL PLVALLEY OAK DR BIXLER RDAssessment DiagramContra Costa County LL-2Zone 35 N:\Contra\FY14-15\LL-2\Diagrams\Zone 35.pdf (Last Update 03-17-17 SA)400 0 400 800200Feet LEGEND Indicates Maintenance Area fromPart A in Engineer's Reportte Frontage/Median Landscaping Open Space Trails Parks 2 1 PedestrianBridge U.S.POSTOFFICE PedestrianBridge June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 564 ANG E L A A V E HIGH EAGLE RDABING TON LN MEGAN CT NELDA WAYPEBBLE CTSTONE VALLEY WAYMI R A N D A A V E STONE VALLEY RD ST PAUL DRPage 1 of 2 STONE VALLEY RD RAY CTHOPE LNGREEN VALLEY RDAssessment DiagramContra Costa County LL-2Zone 36 N:\Contra\FY14-15\LL-2\Diagrams\Zone 36-pg1.pdf (Last Update 04-14-14 SA) 700 0 700 1,400350Feet LEGEND Indicates Maintenance Area fromPart A in Engineer's Reportte Frontage/Median Landscaping Open Space Trails Parks ± 300 0 300 600150Feet 2(see page 2)3 1 1 3 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 565 Page 2 of 2Assessment DiagramContra Costa County LL-2Zone 36 N:\Contra\FY14-15\LL-2\Diagrams\Zone 36-pg2.pdf (Last Update 04-14-14 SA) LEGEND Indicates Maintenance Area fromPart A in Engineer's Reportte Frontage/Median Landscaping Open Space Trails Parks 3(see page 1) 2 1(see page 1) 2,000 0 2,000 4,0001,000 Feet ± Danville Boulevard Stone Valley Road June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 566 Assessment DiagramContra Costa County LL-2Zone 37 N:\Contra\FY14-15\LL-2\Diagrams\Zone 37.pdf (Last Update 04-14-14 SA)500 0 500 1,000250Feet LEGEND Indicates Maintenance Area fromPart A in Engineer's Reportte Frontage/Median Landscaping Open Space Trails Parks ± 2 MARIEPOTTERPARK BIGOAKTREEPARK CLYDEPARK MAYBECKPARK 4 1 3 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 567 Assessment DiagramContra Costa County LL-2Zone 38 ± 1 3 BenefitSubzone "A" BenefitSubzone "B" SAN PABL O B A Y LEFTYGOMEZBALLFIELD RODEOGATEWAY 2 4LEGEND Indicates Maintenance Area fromPart A in Engineer's Reportte Frontage/Median Landscaping Open Space Trails Parks N:\Contra\FY15-16\LL-2\Diagrams\Zone 38.pdf (Last Update 04-16-15 CC)1,100 0 1,100 2,200550Feet Page 1 of 2 RODEOCREEKTRAIL Creek June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 568 Assessment DiagramContra Costa County LL-2Zone 38 1 BenefitSubzone "A" BenefitSubzone "B" LEFTYGOMEZBALLFIELD RODEOGATEWAY RODEOCREEKTRAIL 2 4 LEGEND Indicates Maintenance Area fromPart A in Engineer's Reportte Frontage/Median Landscaping Open Space Trails Parks N:\Contra\FY16-17\LL-2\Diagrams\Zone 38.pdf (Last Update 03-17-17 SA)800 0 800 1,600400Feet 5 Page 2 of 2 Creek PedestrianBridge June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 569 Assessment DiagramContra Costa County LL-2Zone 42 N:\Contra\FY15-16\LL-2\Diagrams\Zone 42.pdf (Last Update 03-17-17 SA)500 0 500 1,000250Feet LEGEND Indicates Maintenance Area fromPart A in Engineer's Reportte Frontage/Median Landscaping Open Space Trails Parks 2 BOEGERPARK 4 1 3 TRADEWINDSPARK 5 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 570 D A N V I L L E B L V DSOUTH AVEIr o n H o r s e T r a i l Assessment DiagramContra Costa County LL-2Zone 45 N:\Contra\FY14-15\LL-2\Diagrams\Zone 45.pdf (Last Update 04-14-14 SA)50 0 50 10025Feet LEGEND Indicates Maintenance Area fromPart A in Engineer's Reportte Frontage/Median Landscaping Open Space Trails Parks ± 1 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 571 HANSEN LNMRACK RDCHESHIRE CTOAKGATE DRCHATHAMTER SHADOW CREEK CT CAMINO TASSAJARA Assessment DiagramContra Costa County LL-2Zone 48 N:\Contra\FY14-15\LL-2\Diagrams\Zone 48.pdf (Last Update 04-14-14 SA)200 0 200 400100Feet LEGEND Indicates Maintenance Area fromPart A in Engineer's Reportte Frontage/Median Landscaping Open Space Trails Parks ±2 1 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 572 LIVORNA RD LAVENDER DRVELVET WAYLIVORNA HEIGHTS RDFOX CI R MIRANDA LNALAMO COUNTRY CIRTULA N E D R ALAMO LNMIRANDA PLPASEO DE SOLJAMES BOWIE CTFALCON VIEW CTMI R A N D A A V EELLIOTT CTCRI M S O N C T OSHER CT TURNER CT N E E L Y C T ENSLEYCT Assessment DiagramContra Costa County LL-2Zone 54 N:\Contra\FY14-15\LL-2\Diagrams\Zone 54.pdf (Last Update 04-14-14 SA)300 0 300 600150Feet LEGEND Indicates Maintenance Area fromPart A in Engineer's Reportte Frontage/Median Landscaping Open Space Trails Parks ± 1 1 1 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 573 Assessment DiagramContra Costa County LL-2Zone 57 N:\Contra\FY15-16\LL-2\Diagrams\Zone 57.pdf (Last Update 04-18-15 CC)400 0 400 800200Feet ± 2 1 3 4 5 5 5 6 REGATTA PARK(AKA TYLER MEMORIAL PARK) 2 U.S.POSTOFFICE LEGEND Indicates Maintenance Area fromPart A in Engineer's Reportte Frontage/Median Landscaping Open Space Trails Parks June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 574 NEWPORT DRPRESTON DRBERKSHIRE CTABERDEEN LNCAMBRIDGE LNPOINT OF TIMBER RD BIXLER RDNEWBURY LNHAMPSHIRE DRSLIFER DRCARDINAL LNAMESBURY STFAREHAM CTSTIRLING CT SUSSEX C T HASTINGS DR CAMBRIDGE CT HALF MOON CTCUMMINGS LN FROST WYBRONTE DREMERSON CTWILDE DRGULLEN DRCOLERIDGE WYPOE DRWILDE DRWILDE DRKEATS CTSLIFER PARK Page 1 of 3 PARK&RIDE LOT N:\Contra\FY14-15\LL-2\Diagrams\Zone 61-pg1.pdf (Last Update 04-14-14 SA) 500 0 500 1,000250Feet ± Assessment DiagramContra Costa County LL-2Zone 61 VILLAGE V VILLAGE III VILLAGE II VILLAGE I VILLAGE IV VILLAGE I 1 4 5 2 County maintained landscape areas are all on the east side of Bixler Road.There are intermittent pockets at entryways which are maintained by other services (HOAs). Point of Timber Road is between Villages I and II (north frontage Village Iand south frontage Village II). The entryway to The Lakes development is maintained by other services (HOAs). * ** Page 3 Page 2 *** 6 3 Indicates Maintenance Area fromPart A in Engineer's Reportte Park & Ride Lots LEGEND Frontage/Median Landscaping Open Space Parks Trails June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 575 BIXLER RDPOINT OF TIMBER RD HAMPSHIRE DRLAKESHORE CIR CRESCENT WAY YOSEMITE WAY WINCHESTER LOOP BRIDGEPORT LOOP SUPERIOR WAYMENDOCINO WAYCUMBERLAND WAYCASTLEROCK LOOP LOOKOUT POINT LOOP KEYSTONE LOOP OTTER BROOK LOOP HALF MOON CTTOPAZ CTLAKESHORE CIRPOE DRPage 2 of 3 N:\Contra\FY14-15\LL-2\Diagrams\Zone 61-pg2.pdf (Last Update 04-14-14 SA) 500 0 500 1,000250Feet ± Assessment DiagramContra Costa County LL-2Zone 61 VILLAGE V VILLAGE III VILLAGE II VILLAGE I VILLAGE IV 6 County maintained landscape areas are all on the east side of Bixler Road.There are intermittent pockets at entryways which are maintained by other services (HOAs). Point of Timber Road is between Villages I and II (north frontage Village Iand south frontage Village II). The entryway to The Lakes development is maintained by other services (HOAs). * ** Page 3 Page 1 VILLAGE II 3 ** * Indicates Maintenance Area fromPart A in Engineer's Reportte Park & Ride Lots LEGEND Frontage/Median Landscaping Open Space Parks Trails June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 576 BIXLER RDLAKEFRONT LOOP ARCADIA CIR GOLDCREEK CIR FERN RIDGE CIR ALMANOR DR OROVILLE C T LAKEFRON T L O O P SENECA CIR CRYSTAL SPRINGS CIR GREEN CASTLE CIR YELLOWSTONE CIR NEW MELONES CIR SHEARWATER CIRLAKEHEAD WAYKEYESPORT WAYBAY HARBOR WAYN LAKEFRONT LOOPTIDEWATER WAYFREEPORT CTDAVENPORT CIRPESCADERO CIRHARBOR HAVEN WAY BOCA RATON WAYMONTICELLO WAYMYSTIC CTOUTRIGGER WAYPYRAMID WAYKEY W WAYWESTPORT CIR BROOKHAVEN CIR PINEHALLOW CIR LIVINGSTON CT MERRITT CT PARDEE CTRAINBOW CTNATOMA CTPage 3 of 3 N:\Contra\FY14-15\LL-2\Diagrams\Zone 61-pg3.pdf (Last Update 04-14-14 SA) 1,000 0 1,000 2,000500Feet ± Assessment DiagramContra Costa County LL-2Zone 61 VILLAGE V VILLAGE III VILLAGE II VILLAGE I VILLAGE IV Page 1 * 6 VILLAGE V VILLAGE III VILLAGE IV County maintained landscape areas are all on the east side of Bixler Road.There are intermittent pockets at entryways which are maintained by other services (HOAs). * Page 2 Indicates Maintenance Area fromPart A in Engineer's Reportte Park & Ride Lots LEGEND Frontage/Median Landscaping Open Space Parks Trails June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 577 Assessment DiagramContra Costa County LL-2Zone 63 N:\Contra\FY14-15\LL-2\Diagrams\Zone 63.pdf (Last Update 04-14-14 SA)100 0 100 20050Feet LEGEND Indicates Maintenance Area fromPart A in Engineer's Reportte Frontage/Median Landscaping Open Space Trails Parks ± 1 PARKWAYESTATESPARK June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 578 DUBLIN D R DUBLIN DRO C O N N E R D R E I R E D R OR O U R K E D R SAN PABLO AVE Assessment DiagramContra Costa County LL-2Zone 64 N:\Contra\FY15-16\LL-2\Diagrams\Zone 64.pdf (Last Update 04-15-15 CC)100 0 100 20050Feet LEGEND Indicates Maintenance Area fromPart A in Engineer's Reportte Frontage/Median Landscaping Open Space Trails Parks ± 1 2 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 579 C H A R B R A Y S T MARTINGALE CTGRIFFON STWELSHLAND STGRIFFON STMASSARA ST CASABLANCA ST MADELINE LNVANESSA WAY MONTE ALBERS WAYBLUE SPUR CIRMANTOVA ST CREEKVIEW PLMENTON STMONTEROSSO STCOLMAR ST GENOA STMARSANNE ST RIOJA ST CASABLANC A S T MONTEROSSO ST CARMEN WAY KNOLLS CREEK DRARIEL DRCAMINO TASSAJA R A PROVENCE RD LUSITANO STAssessment DiagramContra Costa County LL-2Zone 68 N:\Contra\FY14-15\LL-2\Diagrams\Zone 68.pdf (Last Update 04-14-14 SA)400 0 400 800200Feet LEGEND Indicates Maintenance Area fromPart A in Engineer's Reportte Frontage/Median Landscaping Open Space Trails Parks ± 2 1 DIABLO VISTASCHOOLBALLFIELDS June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 580 C H A R B R A Y S T LUSITANO STMARTINGALE CTCASHMERE ST ANGORA CT GRIFFON STWELSHLAND STGRIFFON STMASSARA ST CH A R B R A Y S T BENGALI STBEL A R U S S TEVOLENE STBENGALI STCASABLANCA ST MADELINE LNVANESSA WAY MONTE ALBERS WAYBLUE SPUR CIRMANTOVA ST CREEKVIEW PLMENTON STMONTEROSSO STCOLMAR ST GENOA STMARSANNE ST RIOJA ST CASABLANC A S T MONTEROSSO ST CARMEN WAY KNOLLS CREEK DRARIEL DRCAMINO TASSAJARA CAMINO TASS A J A R A Assessment DiagramContra Costa County LL-2Zone 69 N:\Contra\FY14-15\LL-2\Diagrams\Zone 69.pdf (Last Update 04-14-14 SA)500 0 500 1,000250Feet LEGEND Indicates Maintenance Area fromPart A in Engineer's Reportte Frontage/Median Landscaping Open Space Trails Parks ± 2 5 3 DIABLO VISTASCHOOLBALLFIELDS 1 4 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 581 LAWRENCE RDC H A R B R A Y S T JAS M I N E W Y MARTINGALE CTCULET LN GRIFFON STWELSHLAND STGRIFFON STMASSARA ST F R E E S I A C T CASABLANCA ST MADELINE LNVANESSA WAY CULET DR PROVENCE RD CHESTERFIELD L N MONTE ALBERS WAY MARIGOLD ST CAFE CTCREEKPOINT CT BLUE SPUR CIRMANTOVA ST MENTON STMONTEROSSO STCULET RANCH RD COLMAR ST GENOA STMARSANNE STJASMINE CT RIOJA ST CRYST A L S P R I N G S C T CREEKVIEW PLCASABLAN C A S T MONTEROSSO ST CARMEN WAY KNOLLS CREEK DRARIEL DRDAIS Y C T CAMINO TA S S A J A R A CAMINO TASSAJARA HANSEN LNAssessment DiagramContra Costa County LL-2Zone 70 N:\Contra\FY16-17\LL-2\Diagrams\Zone 70.pdf (Last Update 03-28-16 SA)600 0 600 1,200300Feet LEGEND Indicates Maintenance Area fromPart A in Engineer's Reportte Frontage/Median Landscaping Open Space Trails Parks ± 24 1 5 3 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 582 LAWRENCE RDC H A R B R A Y S T LUSITANO STMARTINGALE CTCASHMERE ST ANGORA CT GRIFFON STWELSHLAND STGRIFFON STMASSARA S T CHARBR A Y ST CH A R B R A Y S T BENGALI STMEADOW LAKE DR BE L A R U S S TEVOLENE STBENGALI STF R E E S I A C T CASABLANCA ST MADELINE LNVANESSA WAY PROVENCE RD MONTE ALBERS WAY MARIGOLD ST CAFE CTBLUE SPUR CIRMANTOVA ST CREEKVIEW PLCULET RANCH RD MENTON STMONTEROSSO STCOLMAR ST GENOA STMARSANNE ST RIOJA ST CASABLAN C A S T CRYST A L S P R I N G S C T MONTEROSSO ST CARMEN WAY KNOLLS CREEK DRARIEL DRCAMINO TASSAJARA CAMINO TASSAJARA CAMINO TASS A J A R A N:\Contra\FY14-15\LL-2\Diagrams\Zone 71.pdf (Last Update 04-14-14 SA)800 0 800 1,600400Feet LEGEND Indicates Maintenance Area fromPart A in Engineer's Reportte Frontage/Median Landscaping Open Space Trails Parks ± DIABLO VISTASCHOOLBALLFIELDS 1 Assessment DiagramContra Costa County LL-2Zone 71 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 583 3RD STMARKET AVE 1ST STSILVER AVE PITTSBURG AVE TRUMAN STGROVE AVEGARDEN TRACT RDDA VILLA N JADE STRUBY AVERICHMOND PKWYHARROLD STHENRY CLARK LUCY REID SPEARS MALCOLM DRELLISON LN W GROVE AVE WARREN DRMARTIN DR2ND ST1ST ST2ND STN:\Contra\FY16-17\LL-2\Diagrams\Zone 74.pdf (Last Update 03-28-16 SA)400 0 400 800200Feet LEGEND Indicates Maintenance Area fromPart A in Engineer's Reportte Frontage/Median Landscaping Open Space Trails Parks ± SPEARSCIRCLE PARK Assessment DiagramContra Costa County LL-2Zone 74 2 3 Subdivision9293 4 6 5 1 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 584 FALLING STAR DRLITTLE VALLEY RDPA C H E C O B L V DFALLING STAR DRHERON LNS U N R I S E D R BA N B U R Y L O O P N O R W A L K C T N:\Contra\FY14-15\LL-2\Diagrams\Zone 75.pdf (Last Update 04-14-14 SA)200 0 200 400100Feet LEGEND Indicates Maintenance Area fromPart A in Engineer's Reportte Frontage/Median Landscaping Open Space Trails Parks ± 1 Assessment DiagramContra Costa County LL-2Zone 75 2 Subdivision8967 Church ofGod June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 585 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONES 1,2,4 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2830 MA LEVY CODE: Lynbrook-Bay Point Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 098-240-057 $76.16 098-240-058 $3,312.96 098-240-059 $361.76 098-240-060 $4,569.60 098-381-001 $76.16 098-381-002 $76.16 098-381-003 $76.16 098-381-004 $76.16 098-381-005 $76.16 098-381-006 $76.16 098-381-007 $76.16 098-381-008 $76.16 098-381-009 $76.16 098-381-010 $76.16 098-381-011 $76.16 098-381-012 $76.16 098-381-013 $76.16 098-381-014 $76.16 098-381-015 $76.16 098-381-016 $76.16 098-381-017 $76.16 098-381-018 $76.16 098-381-019 $76.16 098-381-020 $76.16 098-381-021 $76.16 098-381-022 $76.16 098-381-023 $76.16 098-381-024 $76.16 098-381-025 $76.16 098-381-026 $76.16 098-381-027 $76.16 098-381-028 $76.16 098-381-029 $76.16 098-381-030 $76.16 098-381-031 $76.16 098-381-032 $76.16 098-381-033 $76.16 098-381-034 $76.16 098-382-001 $76.16 098-382-002 $76.16 098-382-003 $76.16 098-382-004 $76.16 098-382-005 $76.16 098-382-006 $76.16 098-382-007 $76.16 098-382-008 $76.16 098-382-009 $76.16 098-382-010 $76.16 098-382-011 $76.16 098-382-012 $76.16 098-382-013 $76.16 098-382-014 $76.16 098-382-015 $76.16 098-382-016 $76.16 098-382-017 $76.16 098-382-018 $76.16 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 098-382-019 $76.16 098-382-020 $76.16 098-382-021 $76.16 098-382-022 $76.16 098-382-023 $76.16 098-382-024 $76.16 098-382-025 $76.16 098-382-026 $76.16 098-382-027 $76.16 098-382-028 $76.16 098-382-029 $76.16 098-382-030 $76.16 098-382-031 $76.16 098-382-032 $76.16 098-383-001 $76.16 098-383-002 $76.16 098-383-003 $76.16 098-383-004 $76.16 098-383-005 $76.16 098-383-006 $76.16 098-383-007 $76.16 098-383-008 $76.16 098-383-009 $76.16 098-383-010 $76.16 098-383-011 $76.16 098-383-012 $76.16 098-383-013 $76.16 098-383-014 $76.16 098-383-015 $76.16 098-383-016 $76.16 098-383-017 $76.16 098-383-018 $76.16 098-383-019 $76.16 098-383-020 $76.16 098-383-021 $76.16 098-383-022 $76.16 098-383-023 $76.16 098-383-024 $76.16 098-383-025 $76.16 098-383-026 $76.16 098-383-027 $76.16 098-383-028 $76.16 098-383-029 $76.16 098-383-030 $76.16 098-383-031 $76.16 098-383-032 $76.16 098-383-033 $76.16 098-383-034 $76.16 098-383-035 $76.16 098-383-036 $76.16 098-383-037 $76.16 098-383-038 $76.16 098-391-001 $76.16 098-391-002 $76.16 098-391-003 $76.16 098-391-004 $76.16 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 098-391-005 $76.16 098-391-006 $76.16 098-391-007 $76.16 098-391-008 $76.16 098-391-009 $76.16 098-391-010 $76.16 098-391-011 $76.16 098-391-012 $76.16 098-391-013 $76.16 098-391-014 $76.16 098-391-015 $76.16 098-391-016 $76.16 098-391-017 $76.16 098-391-018 $76.16 098-391-019 $76.16 098-391-020 $76.16 098-391-021 $76.16 098-391-022 $76.16 098-392-001 $76.16 098-392-002 $76.16 098-392-003 $76.16 098-392-004 $76.16 098-392-005 $76.16 098-392-006 $76.16 098-392-007 $76.16 098-392-008 $76.16 098-392-009 $76.16 098-392-010 $76.16 098-392-011 $76.16 098-392-012 $76.16 098-392-013 $76.16 098-392-014 $76.16 098-392-015 $76.16 098-392-016 $76.16 098-392-017 $76.16 098-392-018 $76.16 098-392-019 $76.16 098-392-020 $76.16 098-392-021 $76.16 098-392-022 $76.16 098-392-023 $76.16 098-392-024 $76.16 098-392-025 $76.16 098-392-026 $76.16 098-392-027 $76.16 098-392-028 $76.16 098-392-029 $76.16 098-393-001 $76.16 098-393-002 $76.16 098-393-003 $76.16 098-393-004 $76.16 098-393-005 $76.16 098-393-006 $76.16 098-393-007 $76.16 098-393-008 $76.16 098-393-009 $76.16 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 098-393-010 $76.16 098-393-011 $76.16 098-393-012 $76.16 098-393-013 $76.16 098-393-014 $76.16 098-393-015 $76.16 098-393-016 $76.16 098-393-017 $76.16 098-393-018 $76.16 098-393-019 $76.16 098-393-020 $76.16 098-393-021 $76.16 098-393-022 $76.16 098-393-023 $76.16 098-393-024 $76.16 098-393-025 $76.16 098-393-026 $76.16 098-393-027 $76.16 098-401-001 $76.16 098-401-002 $38.08 098-401-003 $38.08 098-401-004 $38.08 098-401-005 $38.08 098-401-006 $38.08 098-401-007 $38.08 098-401-008 $38.08 098-401-009 $38.08 098-401-010 $38.08 098-401-011 $38.08 098-401-012 $38.08 098-401-013 $38.08 098-401-014 $38.08 098-401-015 $38.08 098-401-016 $38.08 098-401-017 $38.08 098-401-018 $38.08 098-401-019 $38.08 098-401-020 $38.08 098-401-021 $38.08 098-401-022 $38.08 098-401-023 $38.08 098-401-024 $38.08 098-401-025 $38.08 098-401-026 $76.16 098-401-027 $38.08 098-401-028 $38.08 098-401-029 $38.08 098-401-030 $38.08 098-401-031 $38.08 098-401-032 $38.08 098-402-001 $38.08 098-402-002 $38.08 098-402-003 $38.08 098-402-004 $38.08 098-402-005 $76.16 098-402-006 $38.08 1 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 586 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONES 1,2,4 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2830 MA LEVY CODE: Lynbrook-Bay Point Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 098-402-007 $38.08 098-402-008 $38.08 098-402-009 $38.08 098-402-010 $38.08 098-402-011 $38.08 098-402-012 $38.08 098-402-013 $38.08 098-402-014 $38.08 098-402-015 $38.08 098-403-001 $76.16 098-403-002 $76.16 098-403-003 $76.16 098-403-004 $76.16 098-403-005 $76.16 098-404-001 $38.08 098-404-002 $38.08 098-404-003 $38.08 098-404-004 $38.08 098-404-005 $38.08 098-404-006 $38.08 098-404-007 $38.08 098-404-008 $38.08 098-404-009 $38.08 098-404-010 $38.08 098-404-011 $76.16 098-405-001 $38.08 098-405-002 $38.08 098-405-003 $38.08 098-405-004 $38.08 098-405-005 $38.08 098-405-006 $38.08 098-405-007 $38.08 098-405-008 $38.08 098-405-009 $38.08 098-405-010 $38.08 098-405-011 $38.08 098-405-012 $38.08 098-405-013 $38.08 098-405-014 $38.08 098-405-015 $38.08 098-405-016 $38.08 098-405-017 $38.08 098-405-018 $38.08 098-405-019 $38.08 098-405-020 $38.08 098-405-021 $38.08 098-405-022 $38.08 098-405-023 $76.16 098-405-024 $76.16 098-405-025 $38.08 098-405-026 $38.08 098-405-027 $38.08 098-405-028 $38.08 098-405-029 $38.08 098-405-030 $38.08 098-405-031 $38.08 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 098-405-032 $38.08 098-405-033 $38.08 098-405-034 $38.08 098-405-035 $38.08 098-405-036 $38.08 098-405-037 $38.08 098-405-038 $38.08 098-405-039 $38.08 098-405-040 $38.08 098-405-041 $38.08 098-405-042 $38.08 098-405-043 $38.08 098-405-044 $38.08 098-405-045 $38.08 098-405-046 $38.08 098-405-047 $38.08 098-405-048 $38.08 098-405-049 $38.08 098-405-050 $38.08 098-405-051 $38.08 098-405-052 $38.08 098-405-053 $38.08 098-405-054 $38.08 098-406-001 $76.16 098-406-002 $38.08 098-406-003 $38.08 098-406-004 $38.08 098-406-005 $38.08 098-406-006 $38.08 098-406-007 $38.08 098-406-008 $38.08 098-406-009 $38.08 098-406-010 $38.08 098-406-011 $38.08 098-406-012 $38.08 098-406-013 $38.08 098-406-014 $76.16 098-406-015 $76.16 098-406-016 $38.08 098-406-017 $38.08 098-406-018 $38.08 098-406-019 $38.08 098-406-020 $76.16 098-406-021 $76.16 098-406-022 $38.08 098-406-023 $38.08 098-406-024 $76.16 098-406-025 $38.08 098-406-026 $38.08 098-406-027 $38.08 098-406-028 $38.08 098-406-029 $38.08 098-406-030 $38.08 098-411-001 $76.16 098-411-002 $76.16 098-411-003 $76.16 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 098-411-004 $76.16 098-411-005 $76.16 098-411-006 $76.16 098-411-007 $76.16 098-411-008 $76.16 098-411-009 $76.16 098-411-010 $76.16 098-411-011 $76.16 098-411-012 $76.16 098-411-013 $76.16 098-411-014 $76.16 098-411-015 $76.16 098-411-016 $76.16 098-411-017 $76.16 098-411-018 $76.16 098-411-019 $76.16 098-411-020 $76.16 098-412-001 $76.16 098-412-002 $76.16 098-412-003 $76.16 098-412-004 $76.16 098-412-005 $76.16 098-412-006 $76.16 098-412-007 $76.16 098-412-008 $76.16 098-412-009 $76.16 098-412-010 $76.16 098-412-011 $76.16 098-412-012 $76.16 098-412-013 $76.16 098-412-014 $76.16 098-412-015 $76.16 098-412-016 $76.16 098-412-017 $76.16 098-412-018 $76.16 098-412-019 $76.16 098-412-020 $76.16 098-412-021 $76.16 098-412-022 $76.16 098-412-023 $76.16 098-412-024 $76.16 098-412-025 $76.16 098-412-026 $76.16 098-412-027 $76.16 098-412-028 $76.16 098-412-029 $76.16 098-413-001 $76.16 098-413-002 $76.16 098-413-003 $76.16 098-413-004 $76.16 098-413-005 $76.16 098-413-006 $76.16 098-413-007 $76.16 098-413-008 $76.16 098-413-009 $76.16 098-413-010 $76.16 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 098-413-011 $76.16 098-413-012 $76.16 098-413-013 $76.16 098-413-014 $76.16 098-413-015 $76.16 098-413-016 $76.16 098-413-017 $76.16 098-413-018 $76.16 098-413-019 $76.16 098-413-020 $76.16 098-413-021 $76.16 098-413-022 $76.16 098-413-023 $76.16 098-413-024 $76.16 098-413-025 $76.16 098-413-026 $76.16 098-413-027 $76.16 098-413-028 $76.16 098-413-029 $76.16 098-413-030 $76.16 098-413-031 $76.16 098-413-032 $76.16 098-413-033 $76.16 098-413-034 $76.16 098-413-035 $76.16 098-413-036 $76.16 098-413-037 $76.16 098-413-038 $76.16 098-413-039 $76.16 098-413-040 $76.16 098-413-041 $76.16 098-413-042 $76.16 098-413-043 $76.16 098-413-044 $76.16 098-414-001 $76.16 098-414-002 $76.16 098-414-003 $76.16 098-414-004 $76.16 098-414-005 $76.16 098-414-006 $76.16 098-421-001 $76.16 098-421-002 $76.16 098-421-003 $76.16 098-421-004 $76.16 098-421-005 $76.16 098-421-006 $76.16 098-421-007 $76.16 098-421-008 $76.16 098-421-009 $76.16 098-421-010 $76.16 098-421-011 $76.16 098-421-012 $76.16 098-421-013 $76.16 098-421-014 $76.16 098-421-015 $76.16 098-422-001 $76.16 2 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 587 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONES 1,2,4 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2830 MA LEVY CODE: Lynbrook-Bay Point Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 098-422-002 $76.16 098-422-003 $76.16 098-422-004 $76.16 098-422-005 $76.16 098-422-006 $76.16 098-422-007 $76.16 098-422-008 $76.16 098-422-009 $76.16 098-422-010 $76.16 098-422-011 $76.16 098-422-012 $76.16 098-422-013 $76.16 098-430-001 $38.08 098-430-002 $38.08 098-430-003 $38.08 098-430-004 $38.08 098-430-005 $38.08 098-430-006 $38.08 098-430-007 $38.08 098-430-008 $38.08 098-430-009 $38.08 098-430-010 $38.08 098-430-011 $38.08 098-430-012 $38.08 098-430-013 $38.08 098-430-014 $38.08 098-430-015 $38.08 098-430-016 $38.08 098-430-017 $38.08 098-430-018 $38.08 098-430-019 $76.16 098-430-020 $38.08 098-430-021 $38.08 098-430-022 $38.08 098-430-023 $38.08 098-430-024 $38.08 098-430-025 $38.08 098-430-026 $38.08 098-430-027 $38.08 098-430-028 $38.08 098-430-029 $38.08 098-430-030 $76.16 098-430-031 $38.08 098-430-032 $38.08 098-430-033 $38.08 098-430-034 $38.08 098-430-035 $38.08 098-430-036 $38.08 098-430-037 $38.08 098-430-038 $38.08 098-430-039 $76.16 098-430-040 $38.08 098-430-041 $38.08 098-430-042 $38.08 098-430-043 $38.08 098-431-001 $38.08 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 098-431-002 $38.08 098-431-003 $76.16 098-431-004 $76.16 098-431-005 $76.16 098-431-006 $38.08 098-431-007 $38.08 098-431-008 $38.08 098-431-009 $38.08 098-431-010 $38.08 098-431-011 $38.08 098-431-012 $76.16 098-431-013 $38.08 098-431-014 $38.08 098-431-015 $38.08 098-431-016 $38.08 098-431-017 $38.08 098-431-018 $38.08 098-432-001 $38.08 098-432-002 $38.08 098-432-003 $38.08 098-432-004 $38.08 098-432-005 $38.08 098-432-006 $38.08 098-432-007 $76.16 098-432-008 $76.16 098-432-009 $38.08 098-432-010 $76.16 098-432-011 $38.08 098-432-012 $38.08 098-432-013 $38.08 098-432-014 $38.08 098-432-015 $38.08 098-432-016 $38.08 098-432-017 $38.08 098-432-018 $38.08 098-432-019 $38.08 098-432-020 $38.08 098-432-021 $76.16 098-432-022 $76.16 098-433-001 $38.08 098-433-002 $76.16 098-433-003 $38.08 098-433-004 $38.08 098-433-005 $38.08 098-433-006 $38.08 098-433-007 $38.08 098-433-008 $38.08 098-433-009 $38.08 098-433-010 $38.08 098-433-011 $38.08 098-433-012 $38.08 098-441-001 $76.16 098-441-002 $76.16 098-441-003 $76.16 098-441-004 $76.16 098-441-005 $76.16 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 098-441-006 $76.16 098-441-007 $76.16 098-441-008 $76.16 098-441-009 $76.16 098-441-010 $76.16 098-441-011 $76.16 098-441-012 $76.16 098-441-013 $76.16 098-441-014 $76.16 098-441-015 $76.16 098-441-016 $76.16 098-441-017 $76.16 098-441-018 $76.16 098-441-019 $76.16 098-441-020 $76.16 098-441-021 $76.16 098-441-022 $76.16 098-441-023 $76.16 098-441-024 $76.16 098-441-025 $76.16 098-441-026 $76.16 098-441-027 $76.16 098-441-028 $76.16 098-441-029 $76.16 098-441-030 $76.16 098-441-031 $76.16 098-441-032 $76.16 098-441-033 $76.16 098-441-034 $76.16 098-441-035 $76.16 098-441-036 $76.16 098-441-037 $76.16 098-441-038 $76.16 098-441-039 $76.16 098-441-040 $76.16 098-441-041 $76.16 098-441-042 $76.16 098-441-043 $76.16 098-441-044 $76.16 098-441-045 $76.16 098-441-046 $76.16 098-441-047 $76.16 098-441-048 $76.16 098-441-049 $76.16 098-441-050 $76.16 098-441-051 $76.16 098-441-052 $76.16 098-441-053 $76.16 098-441-054 $76.16 098-441-055 $76.16 098-441-056 $76.16 098-441-057 $76.16 098-441-058 $76.16 098-441-059 $76.16 098-441-060 $76.16 098-442-001 $76.16 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 098-442-002 $76.16 098-442-003 $76.16 098-442-004 $76.16 098-442-005 $76.16 098-442-006 $76.16 098-442-007 $76.16 098-442-008 $76.16 098-442-009 $76.16 098-442-010 $76.16 098-442-011 $76.16 098-442-012 $76.16 098-442-013 $76.16 098-442-014 $76.16 098-442-015 $76.16 098-442-016 $76.16 098-442-017 $76.16 098-442-018 $76.16 098-442-019 $76.16 098-442-020 $76.16 098-442-021 $76.16 098-442-022 $76.16 098-442-023 $76.16 098-442-024 $76.16 098-442-025 $76.16 098-442-026 $76.16 098-442-027 $76.16 098-442-028 $76.16 098-442-029 $76.16 098-443-001 $76.16 098-443-002 $76.16 098-443-003 $76.16 098-443-004 $76.16 098-443-005 $76.16 098-443-006 $76.16 098-443-007 $76.16 098-443-008 $76.16 098-443-009 $76.16 098-443-010 $76.16 098-443-011 $76.16 098-443-012 $76.16 098-443-013 $76.16 098-443-014 $76.16 098-443-015 $76.16 098-443-016 $76.16 098-443-017 $76.16 098-443-018 $76.16 098-443-019 $76.16 098-443-020 $76.16 098-443-021 $76.16 098-443-022 $76.16 098-443-023 $76.16 098-443-024 $76.16 098-443-025 $76.16 098-443-026 $76.16 098-443-027 $76.16 098-443-028 $76.16 3 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 588 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONES 1,2,4 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2830 MA LEVY CODE: Lynbrook-Bay Point Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 098-443-029 $76.16 098-443-030 $76.16 098-443-031 $76.16 098-443-032 $76.16 098-443-033 $76.16 098-443-034 $76.16 098-443-035 $76.16 098-443-036 $76.16 098-443-037 $76.16 098-443-038 $76.16 098-443-039 $76.16 098-443-040 $76.16 098-450-002 $9,329.60 685Total Parcels: $61,365.92 Total Assessment: 4 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 589 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 3 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2831 ML LEVY CODE: Hickory Meadows - Bay Point Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 097-331-001 $180.08 097-331-002 $180.08 097-331-003 $180.08 097-331-004 $180.08 097-331-005 $180.08 097-331-006 $180.08 097-331-007 $180.08 097-331-008 $180.08 097-331-009 $180.08 097-331-010 $180.08 097-331-011 $180.08 097-331-012 $180.08 097-331-013 $180.08 097-331-014 $180.08 097-331-015 $180.08 097-331-016 $180.08 097-331-017 $180.08 097-331-018 $180.08 097-331-019 $180.08 097-331-020 $180.08 097-331-021 $180.08 097-331-022 $180.08 097-331-023 $180.08 097-331-024 $180.08 097-331-025 $180.08 097-331-026 $180.08 097-331-027 $180.08 097-331-028 $180.08 097-331-029 $180.08 097-331-030 $180.08 097-331-031 $180.08 097-331-032 $180.08 097-331-033 $180.08 097-331-034 $180.08 097-332-001 $180.08 097-332-002 $180.08 097-332-003 $180.08 097-332-004 $180.08 097-332-005 $180.08 097-332-006 $180.08 097-332-007 $180.08 097-332-008 $180.08 097-332-009 $180.08 097-333-001 $180.08 097-333-002 $180.08 097-333-003 $180.08 097-333-004 $180.08 097-333-005 $180.08 097-333-006 $180.08 097-333-007 $180.08 097-333-008 $180.08 097-333-009 $180.08 097-333-010 $180.08 097-333-011 $180.08 097-333-012 $180.08 097-333-013 $180.08 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 097-333-014 $180.08 097-333-015 $180.08 097-333-016 $180.08 097-333-017 $180.08 097-333-018 $180.08 097-333-019 $180.08 097-333-020 $180.08 097-333-021 $180.08 097-334-001 $180.08 097-334-002 $180.08 097-334-003 $180.08 097-334-004 $180.08 097-334-005 $180.08 097-334-006 $180.08 097-334-007 $180.08 097-334-008 $180.08 097-334-009 $180.08 097-334-010 $180.08 097-334-011 $180.08 097-334-012 $180.08 097-334-013 $180.08 097-334-014 $180.08 78Total Parcels: $14,046.24 Total Assessment: 5 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 590 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 5 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2824 NC LEVY CODE: Pacheco Beautification Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 125-032-004 $65.38 125-032-005 $65.38 125-032-006 $65.38 125-032-012 $65.38 125-032-030 $65.38 125-032-031 $84.34 125-032-032 $65.38 125-032-033 $32.68 125-032-035 $65.38 125-046-001 $65.38 125-046-009 $77.14 125-046-010 $65.38 125-071-005 $65.38 125-071-008 $65.38 125-071-009 $65.38 125-071-010 $65.38 125-071-011 $32.68 125-071-012 $32.68 125-072-005 $65.38 125-072-006 $65.38 125-072-007 $65.38 125-072-008 $65.38 125-072-009 $65.38 125-072-010 $65.38 125-072-011 $65.38 125-072-012 $65.38 125-072-013 $65.38 125-072-014 $65.38 125-072-015 $65.38 125-073-003 $65.38 125-074-004 $65.38 125-074-005 $65.38 125-074-006 $65.38 125-074-009 $65.38 125-074-010 $65.38 125-074-011 $65.38 125-074-012 $65.38 125-074-013 $65.38 125-074-014 $65.38 125-074-016 $65.38 125-074-017 $65.38 125-074-018 $65.38 125-075-003 $65.38 125-075-004 $65.38 125-075-005 $65.38 125-075-007 $65.38 125-075-010 $65.38 125-075-011 $65.38 125-075-012 $65.38 125-075-013 $32.68 125-076-002 $65.38 125-077-018 $65.38 125-077-024 $65.38 125-080-007 $65.38 125-080-008 $65.38 125-080-012 $65.38 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 125-080-019 $65.38 125-080-020 $65.38 125-080-021 $65.38 125-080-035 $65.38 125-080-036 $65.38 125-080-037 $65.38 125-080-038 $65.38 125-080-039 $65.38 125-080-040 $65.38 125-080-041 $65.38 125-080-042 $65.38 125-080-043 $65.38 125-080-044 $65.38 125-080-045 $65.38 125-080-046 $65.38 125-080-047 $65.38 125-080-048 $65.38 125-080-049 $65.38 125-080-050 $65.38 125-080-051 $65.38 125-080-052 $65.38 125-080-053 $65.38 125-080-054 $65.38 125-080-055 $65.38 125-080-056 $65.38 125-080-057 $65.38 125-080-058 $65.38 125-080-059 $65.38 125-080-060 $65.38 125-080-061 $65.38 125-080-062 $65.38 125-080-063 $65.38 125-080-064 $65.38 125-080-065 $65.38 125-080-066 $65.38 125-080-067 $65.38 125-080-068 $65.38 125-080-069 $65.38 125-080-070 $65.38 125-080-071 $65.38 125-080-072 $65.38 125-080-073 $65.38 125-080-074 $65.38 125-080-075 $65.38 125-080-076 $65.38 125-080-077 $65.38 125-080-078 $65.38 125-080-079 $65.38 125-080-080 $65.38 125-080-081 $65.38 125-080-082 $65.38 125-080-083 $65.38 125-080-084 $65.38 125-080-085 $65.38 125-080-086 $65.38 125-080-087 $65.38 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 125-080-088 $65.38 125-080-089 $65.38 125-080-090 $65.38 125-080-091 $65.38 125-080-092 $65.38 125-080-093 $65.38 125-080-094 $65.38 125-080-095 $65.38 125-080-096 $65.38 125-080-097 $65.38 125-080-098 $65.38 125-080-099 $65.38 125-080-100 $65.38 125-080-101 $65.38 125-080-102 $65.38 125-080-103 $65.38 125-080-104 $65.38 125-080-105 $65.38 125-080-107 $32.68 125-080-108 $32.68 125-080-109 $32.68 125-080-110 $32.68 125-080-111 $32.68 125-080-112 $32.68 125-080-113 $32.68 125-080-114 $32.68 125-080-115 $32.68 125-080-116 $32.68 125-080-117 $32.68 125-080-118 $32.68 125-080-119 $32.68 125-080-120 $32.68 125-080-121 $32.68 125-080-122 $32.68 125-090-001 $65.38 125-090-002 $65.38 125-090-003 $65.38 125-090-004 $65.38 125-090-005 $65.38 125-090-006 $65.38 125-090-009 $65.38 125-090-010 $65.38 125-090-032 $65.38 125-090-033 $65.38 125-090-036 $65.38 125-090-037 $65.38 125-090-038 $65.38 125-090-039 $65.38 125-090-067 $32.68 125-090-068 $65.38 125-090-069 $65.38 125-090-070 $65.38 125-090-071 $65.38 125-090-072 $65.38 125-091-051 $65.38 125-091-052 $65.38 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 125-091-053 $65.38 125-091-054 $65.38 125-091-055 $65.38 125-091-056 $65.38 125-091-057 $65.38 125-091-058 $65.38 125-091-059 $65.38 125-091-060 $65.38 125-091-061 $65.38 125-091-062 $65.38 125-091-063 $65.38 125-091-064 $65.38 125-091-065 $65.38 125-091-066 $65.38 125-091-067 $65.38 125-091-068 $65.38 125-091-069 $65.38 125-091-070 $65.38 125-091-071 $65.38 125-091-072 $65.38 125-091-073 $65.38 125-091-074 $65.38 125-091-075 $65.38 125-091-076 $65.38 125-091-077 $65.38 125-091-078 $65.38 125-091-079 $65.38 125-091-080 $65.38 125-100-009 $65.38 125-100-010 $65.38 125-100-011 $65.38 125-100-012 $65.38 125-100-013 $32.68 125-100-014 $65.38 125-100-015 $65.38 125-100-016 $98.06 125-100-017 $65.38 125-100-018 $32.68 125-100-021 $65.38 125-100-022 $65.38 125-100-023 $65.38 125-100-026 $32.68 125-100-027 $65.38 125-100-035 $32.68 125-100-037 $65.38 125-100-039 $196.14 125-111-001 $65.38 125-111-002 $65.38 125-111-003 $65.38 125-111-004 $65.38 125-111-005 $65.38 125-111-006 $65.38 125-111-007 $65.38 125-111-008 $65.38 125-111-009 $65.38 125-111-010 $65.38 6 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 591 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 5 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2824 NC LEVY CODE: Pacheco Beautification Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 125-111-011 $65.38 125-111-012 $65.38 125-111-013 $65.38 125-111-014 $65.38 125-111-015 $65.38 125-111-016 $65.38 125-111-017 $65.38 125-111-018 $65.38 125-111-019 $65.38 125-111-020 $65.38 125-111-021 $65.38 125-111-022 $65.38 125-111-023 $65.38 125-111-024 $65.38 125-111-025 $65.38 125-111-026 $65.38 125-111-027 $65.38 125-111-028 $65.38 125-112-001 $65.38 125-112-002 $65.38 125-112-003 $65.38 125-113-001 $65.38 125-113-002 $65.38 125-113-003 $65.38 125-113-004 $65.38 125-113-005 $65.38 125-113-006 $65.38 125-113-007 $65.38 125-113-008 $65.38 125-113-009 $65.38 125-113-010 $65.38 125-114-005 $65.38 125-114-006 $65.38 125-114-007 $65.38 125-114-008 $65.38 125-114-009 $65.38 125-114-010 $65.38 125-114-011 $65.38 125-114-012 $65.38 125-114-013 $65.38 125-114-014 $65.38 125-114-015 $65.38 125-114-016 $65.38 125-114-017 $65.38 125-114-019 $65.38 125-114-020 $65.38 125-114-021 $65.38 125-114-022 $65.38 125-115-002 $65.38 125-115-003 $65.38 125-115-004 $65.38 125-115-005 $65.38 125-115-006 $65.38 125-115-007 $65.38 125-115-008 $65.38 125-115-009 $65.38 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 125-115-010 $65.38 125-120-003 $65.38 125-120-007 $65.38 125-120-010 $65.38 125-120-012 $65.38 125-120-014 $65.38 125-120-015 $65.38 125-120-017 $32.68 125-120-021 $130.76 125-120-025 $65.38 125-120-026 $65.38 125-120-034 $65.38 125-120-037 $65.38 125-120-038 $65.38 125-120-039 $65.38 125-120-040 $65.38 125-120-041 $65.38 125-120-042 $65.38 125-120-045 $65.38 125-120-046 $65.38 125-120-047 $65.38 125-120-048 $65.38 125-120-049 $65.38 125-120-050 $65.38 125-120-051 $65.38 125-120-052 $65.38 125-120-053 $65.38 125-120-054 $65.38 125-120-055 $65.38 125-120-056 $65.38 125-120-057 $65.38 125-120-058 $65.38 125-120-063 $65.38 125-120-064 $65.38 125-120-065 $65.38 125-120-066 $65.38 125-120-067 $65.38 125-120-068 $65.38 125-120-069 $65.38 125-120-070 $65.38 125-120-071 $65.38 125-120-072 $65.38 125-120-073 $32.68 125-120-074 $65.38 125-120-075 $65.38 125-120-076 $65.38 125-120-078 $65.38 125-120-079 $65.38 125-120-083 $65.38 125-120-085 $65.38 125-120-086 $65.38 125-120-091 $65.38 125-120-092 $65.38 125-120-093 $65.38 125-120-095 $65.38 125-120-096 $65.38 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 125-120-097 $65.38 125-120-098 $65.38 125-120-099 $65.38 125-120-100 $65.38 125-120-105 $32.68 125-120-109 $326.90 125-120-110 $81.06 125-120-111 $65.38 125-120-112 $915.32 125-120-113 $32.68 125-120-114 $32.68 125-120-115 $32.68 125-120-116 $32.68 125-130-016 $65.38 125-130-018 $130.10 125-140-005 $32.68 125-140-006 $392.28 125-140-007 $65.38 125-140-008 $65.38 125-140-010 $65.38 125-140-011 $65.38 125-140-012 $65.38 125-140-013 $65.38 125-140-014 $65.38 125-140-015 $65.38 125-140-016 $65.38 125-140-017 $65.38 125-140-018 $65.38 125-140-019 $65.38 125-140-020 $65.38 125-140-021 $65.38 125-140-022 $65.38 125-140-023 $65.38 125-151-001 $65.38 125-151-002 $65.38 125-151-003 $65.38 125-151-004 $65.38 125-151-005 $65.38 125-151-006 $65.38 125-151-007 $65.38 125-151-008 $65.38 125-151-009 $65.38 125-151-010 $65.38 125-151-011 $65.38 125-151-012 $65.38 125-151-013 $65.38 125-151-014 $65.38 125-151-015 $65.38 125-152-001 $65.38 125-152-002 $65.38 125-152-003 $65.38 125-152-004 $65.38 125-152-005 $65.38 125-152-006 $65.38 125-152-007 $65.38 125-152-008 $65.38 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 125-152-009 $65.38 125-152-010 $65.38 125-152-011 $65.38 125-152-012 $65.38 125-152-013 $65.38 125-153-001 $65.38 125-153-002 $65.38 125-153-003 $65.38 125-153-004 $65.38 125-153-005 $65.38 125-153-006 $65.38 125-153-007 $65.38 125-153-008 $65.38 125-155-001 $65.38 125-155-002 $65.38 125-155-003 $65.38 125-155-004 $65.38 125-155-005 $65.38 125-155-006 $65.38 125-155-007 $65.38 125-155-008 $65.38 125-155-009 $65.38 125-155-010 $65.38 125-155-011 $65.38 125-155-012 $65.38 125-155-013 $65.38 125-155-014 $65.38 125-155-015 $65.38 125-155-016 $65.38 125-155-017 $65.38 125-155-021 $32.68 125-155-022 $65.38 125-155-024 $32.68 125-155-026 $32.68 125-155-051 $65.38 125-155-052 $65.38 125-156-001 $65.38 125-156-002 $65.38 125-156-003 $65.38 125-156-004 $65.38 125-156-005 $65.38 125-156-006 $65.38 125-156-007 $65.38 125-156-008 $65.38 125-156-009 $65.38 125-156-010 $65.38 125-156-011 $65.38 125-156-012 $65.38 125-156-013 $65.38 125-156-014 $65.38 125-156-015 $65.38 125-156-016 $65.38 125-156-017 $65.38 125-156-018 $65.38 125-156-019 $65.38 125-156-020 $65.38 7 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 592 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 5 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2824 NC LEVY CODE: Pacheco Beautification Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 125-156-021 $65.38 125-156-022 $65.38 125-156-023 $65.38 125-156-024 $65.38 125-156-025 $65.38 125-156-026 $65.38 125-156-027 $65.38 125-156-028 $65.38 125-156-029 $65.38 125-156-030 $65.38 125-156-031 $65.38 125-156-032 $65.38 125-156-033 $65.38 125-156-034 $65.38 125-156-035 $65.38 125-156-036 $65.38 125-156-037 $65.38 125-156-038 $65.38 125-156-039 $65.38 125-161-001 $65.38 125-161-002 $65.38 125-161-003 $65.38 125-161-004 $65.38 125-161-005 $65.38 125-161-006 $65.38 125-161-007 $65.38 125-161-008 $65.38 125-161-009 $65.38 125-161-010 $65.38 125-162-001 $65.38 125-162-002 $65.38 125-162-003 $65.38 125-162-004 $65.38 125-163-001 $65.38 125-163-002 $65.38 125-163-003 $65.38 125-163-004 $65.38 125-163-005 $65.38 125-163-006 $65.38 125-163-007 $65.38 125-163-008 $65.38 125-163-009 $65.38 125-163-010 $65.38 125-163-011 $65.38 125-163-012 $65.38 125-163-013 $65.38 125-163-014 $65.38 125-163-015 $65.38 125-163-016 $65.38 125-163-017 $65.38 125-163-018 $65.38 125-163-019 $65.38 125-163-020 $65.38 125-163-021 $65.38 125-163-022 $65.38 125-164-001 $65.38 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 125-164-002 $65.38 125-164-003 $65.38 125-164-004 $65.38 125-164-005 $65.38 125-164-006 $65.38 125-164-007 $65.38 125-164-008 $65.38 125-164-009 $65.38 125-164-010 $65.38 125-165-001 $65.38 125-165-002 $65.38 125-165-003 $65.38 125-165-004 $65.38 125-165-005 $65.38 125-165-006 $65.38 125-165-007 $65.38 125-165-008 $65.38 125-165-009 $65.38 125-171-001 $65.38 125-171-002 $65.38 125-171-003 $65.38 125-171-004 $65.38 125-171-005 $65.38 125-171-006 $65.38 125-172-001 $65.38 125-172-002 $65.38 125-172-003 $65.38 125-172-004 $65.38 125-172-005 $65.38 125-172-006 $65.38 125-172-007 $65.38 125-172-008 $65.38 125-172-009 $65.38 125-173-001 $65.38 125-173-002 $65.38 125-173-003 $65.38 125-173-004 $65.38 125-173-005 $65.38 125-174-001 $65.38 125-174-002 $65.38 125-174-003 $65.38 125-174-004 $65.38 125-174-005 $65.38 125-174-006 $65.38 125-174-007 $65.38 125-174-008 $65.38 125-174-009 $65.38 125-174-010 $65.38 125-181-001 $65.38 125-181-002 $65.38 125-181-003 $65.38 125-181-004 $65.38 125-181-005 $65.38 125-181-006 $65.38 125-181-007 $65.38 125-181-008 $65.38 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 125-182-001 $65.38 125-182-002 $65.38 125-182-003 $65.38 125-182-004 $65.38 125-182-005 $65.38 125-182-006 $65.38 125-182-007 $65.38 125-182-008 $65.38 125-182-009 $65.38 125-182-010 $65.38 125-182-011 $65.38 125-182-012 $65.38 125-182-013 $65.38 125-182-014 $65.38 125-182-015 $65.38 125-182-016 $65.38 125-182-017 $65.38 125-182-018 $65.38 125-182-019 $65.38 125-182-020 $65.38 125-183-001 $65.38 125-183-002 $65.38 125-183-003 $65.38 125-183-004 $65.38 125-183-005 $65.38 125-183-006 $65.38 125-184-001 $65.38 125-184-002 $65.38 125-184-003 $65.38 125-184-004 $65.38 125-184-005 $65.38 125-184-006 $65.38 125-184-007 $65.38 125-184-008 $65.38 125-185-003 $65.38 125-185-018 $65.38 125-185-022 $65.38 125-185-023 $65.38 125-185-024 $65.38 125-185-025 $65.38 125-185-026 $65.38 125-186-001 $65.38 125-186-002 $65.38 125-186-003 $65.38 125-186-004 $65.38 125-186-005 $65.38 125-191-001 $65.38 125-191-002 $65.38 125-191-003 $65.38 125-191-004 $65.38 125-191-005 $65.38 125-191-006 $65.38 125-191-007 $65.38 125-191-008 $65.38 125-191-009 $65.38 125-191-010 $65.38 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 125-191-011 $65.38 125-191-012 $65.38 125-191-013 $65.38 125-191-014 $65.38 125-191-015 $65.38 125-191-016 $65.38 125-191-017 $65.38 125-192-001 $65.38 125-192-002 $65.38 125-192-003 $65.38 125-192-004 $65.38 125-192-005 $65.38 125-192-006 $65.38 125-192-007 $65.38 125-192-008 $65.38 125-192-009 $65.38 125-193-001 $65.38 125-193-002 $65.38 125-193-003 $65.38 125-193-004 $65.38 125-193-005 $65.38 125-193-006 $65.38 125-193-007 $65.38 125-193-008 $65.38 125-193-009 $65.38 125-193-010 $65.38 125-193-011 $65.38 125-193-012 $65.38 125-193-013 $65.38 125-193-014 $65.38 125-193-015 $65.38 125-193-016 $65.38 125-193-017 $65.38 125-193-018 $65.38 125-193-045 $65.38 125-193-050 $65.38 125-193-051 $65.38 125-193-052 $65.38 125-193-053 $65.38 125-193-054 $65.38 125-193-055 $65.38 125-193-056 $65.38 125-220-002 $65.38 125-220-007 $65.38 125-220-010 $78.46 125-220-011 $65.38 125-220-012 $65.38 125-220-015 $65.38 125-220-016 $69.30 125-220-017 $65.38 125-220-018 $65.38 125-220-019 $32.68 125-220-020 $32.68 125-231-010 $69.96 125-231-011 $70.60 125-231-012 $132.72 8 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 593 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 5 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2824 NC LEVY CODE: Pacheco Beautification Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 125-231-013 $196.14 125-232-002 $127.48 125-232-003 $196.14 125-232-005 $150.36 125-232-006 $65.38 125-232-007 $109.18 125-232-008 $65.38 125-240-023 $196.14 125-240-029 $196.14 125-240-032 $159.52 125-240-034 $150.36 125-240-037 $73.88 125-240-038 $87.60 125-240-045 $84.34 125-240-046 $72.56 125-240-047 $65.38 125-240-048 $109.84 125-240-049 $109.84 125-240-050 $75.18 125-240-056 $196.14 125-260-001 $65.38 125-260-002 $65.38 125-260-005 $65.38 125-260-006 $32.68 125-260-007 $65.38 125-260-008 $65.38 125-260-009 $65.38 125-260-010 $32.68 125-260-011 $65.38 125-260-012 $65.38 125-271-001 $65.38 125-271-004 $65.38 125-271-006 $65.38 125-271-009 $65.38 125-271-010 $65.38 125-271-012 $65.38 125-271-013 $32.68 125-271-014 $65.38 125-271-015 $65.38 125-272-002 $65.38 125-272-003 $65.38 125-272-004 $32.68 125-272-005 $65.38 125-272-006 $65.38 125-272-007 $65.38 125-272-008 $65.38 125-272-009 $65.38 125-272-012 $65.38 125-272-013 $65.38 125-272-014 $65.38 125-272-015 $65.38 125-272-017 $65.38 125-272-018 $65.38 125-272-023 $65.38 125-272-024 $65.38 125-272-025 $65.38 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 125-272-026 $65.38 125-272-027 $32.68 125-272-028 $65.38 125-281-001 $65.38 125-281-002 $65.38 125-281-003 $65.38 125-281-004 $65.38 125-281-005 $65.38 125-281-006 $65.38 125-281-008 $65.38 125-281-009 $65.38 125-281-010 $65.38 125-281-011 $65.38 125-281-012 $65.38 125-281-013 $65.38 125-281-014 $65.38 125-282-001 $65.38 125-282-002 $65.38 125-282-004 $65.38 125-282-005 $65.38 125-282-009 $65.38 125-282-010 $65.38 125-282-011 $65.38 125-282-012 $65.38 125-282-013 $65.38 125-282-014 $65.38 125-282-016 $65.38 125-282-017 $65.38 125-282-018 $65.38 125-282-019 $65.38 125-282-021 $65.38 125-282-022 $65.38 125-282-023 $65.38 125-282-024 $65.38 125-282-026 $65.38 125-282-027 $65.38 125-282-028 $65.38 125-282-029 $65.38 125-292-004 $65.38 125-292-005 $65.38 125-292-006 $65.38 125-292-007 $65.38 125-292-008 $65.38 125-330-001 $32.68 125-330-002 $32.68 125-330-003 $32.68 125-330-004 $32.68 125-330-005 $32.68 125-330-006 $32.68 125-330-007 $32.68 125-330-008 $32.68 125-330-009 $32.68 125-330-010 $32.68 125-330-011 $32.68 125-330-012 $32.68 125-330-013 $32.68 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 125-330-014 $32.68 125-330-015 $32.68 125-330-016 $32.68 125-330-017 $32.68 125-330-018 $32.68 125-330-019 $32.68 125-330-020 $32.68 125-330-021 $32.68 125-330-022 $32.68 125-330-023 $32.68 125-330-024 $32.68 125-330-025 $32.68 125-330-026 $32.68 125-330-027 $32.68 125-330-028 $32.68 125-330-029 $32.68 125-330-030 $32.68 125-330-031 $32.68 125-330-032 $32.68 125-330-033 $32.68 125-330-034 $32.68 125-330-035 $32.68 125-330-036 $32.68 125-330-037 $32.68 125-330-038 $32.68 125-330-039 $32.68 125-330-040 $32.68 125-330-041 $32.68 125-330-042 $32.68 125-330-043 $32.68 125-330-044 $32.68 125-330-045 $32.68 125-340-014 $65.38 125-350-001 $32.68 125-350-002 $32.68 125-350-003 $32.68 125-350-004 $32.68 125-350-005 $32.68 125-350-006 $32.68 125-350-007 $32.68 125-350-008 $32.68 125-350-009 $32.68 125-350-010 $32.68 125-350-011 $32.68 125-350-012 $32.68 125-350-013 $32.68 125-350-014 $32.68 125-350-015 $32.68 125-350-016 $32.68 125-350-017 $32.68 125-350-018 $32.68 125-350-019 $32.68 125-350-020 $32.68 125-350-021 $32.68 125-350-022 $32.68 125-350-023 $32.68 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 125-350-024 $32.68 125-350-025 $32.68 125-350-026 $32.68 125-350-027 $32.68 125-350-028 $32.68 125-350-029 $32.68 125-350-030 $32.68 125-350-031 $32.68 125-350-032 $32.68 125-350-033 $32.68 125-350-034 $32.68 125-350-035 $32.68 125-350-036 $32.68 125-360-001 $32.68 125-360-002 $32.68 125-360-003 $32.68 125-360-004 $32.68 125-360-005 $32.68 125-360-006 $32.68 125-360-007 $32.68 125-360-008 $32.68 125-360-009 $32.68 125-360-010 $32.68 125-360-011 $32.68 125-360-012 $32.68 125-360-013 $32.68 125-360-014 $32.68 125-360-015 $32.68 125-360-016 $32.68 125-360-017 $32.68 125-360-018 $32.68 125-360-019 $32.68 125-360-020 $32.68 125-360-021 $32.68 125-360-022 $32.68 125-360-023 $32.68 125-360-024 $32.68 125-360-025 $32.68 125-360-026 $32.68 125-360-027 $32.68 125-360-028 $32.68 125-360-029 $32.68 125-155-029 $32.68 125-155-030 $32.68 125-155-031 $32.68 125-155-032 $32.68 125-155-033 $32.68 125-155-034 $32.68 125-155-035 $32.68 125-155-036 $32.68 125-155-037 $32.68 125-155-038 $32.68 125-155-039 $32.68 125-155-040 $32.68 125-155-041 $32.68 125-155-042 $32.68 9 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 594 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 5 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2824 NC LEVY CODE: Pacheco Beautification Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 125-155-043 $32.68 125-155-044 $32.68 125-155-045 $32.68 125-155-046 $32.68 125-155-047 $32.68 125-155-048 $32.68 125-155-049 $32.68 125-155-050 $32.68 125-077-028 $146.44 125-140-027 $85.64 125-140-028 $65.38 907Total Parcels: $56,730.30 Total Assessment: 10 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 595 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 7 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2834 MO LEVY CODE: Pleasant Hill BART RDA Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 148-202-057 $1,458.54 148-202-071 $319.66 148-221-033 $2,892.24 148-231-029 $1,701.62 148-250-083 $5,013.48 148-250-090 $6,009.20 148-250-091 $1,273.16 148-260-053 $16.12 148-260-054 $483.60 148-260-055 $483.60 148-260-060 $464.08 148-260-062 $163.30 148-260-063 $112.02 148-270-017 $57.70 148-270-018 $16.12 148-270-050 $905.14 148-270-053 $197.46 148-460-005 $16.12 148-460-006 $16.12 148-460-007 $16.12 148-460-008 $16.12 148-460-009 $16.12 148-460-010 $16.12 148-460-011 $16.12 148-460-012 $16.12 148-460-013 $16.12 148-460-014 $16.12 148-460-015 $16.12 148-460-016 $16.12 148-460-017 $16.12 148-460-018 $16.12 148-460-019 $16.12 148-460-020 $16.12 148-460-021 $16.12 148-460-022 $16.12 148-460-023 $16.12 148-460-024 $16.12 148-460-025 $16.12 148-460-026 $16.12 148-460-027 $16.12 148-460-028 $16.12 148-460-029 $16.12 148-460-030 $16.12 148-460-031 $16.12 148-460-032 $16.12 148-460-033 $16.12 148-460-034 $16.12 148-460-035 $16.12 148-460-036 $16.12 148-460-037 $16.12 148-460-038 $16.12 148-460-039 $16.12 148-460-040 $16.12 148-460-046 $16.12 148-460-047 $16.12 148-460-048 $16.12 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 148-460-049 $16.12 148-460-050 $16.12 148-460-051 $16.12 148-460-052 $16.12 148-460-053 $16.12 148-460-054 $16.12 148-460-055 $16.12 148-460-056 $16.12 148-460-057 $16.12 148-460-058 $16.12 148-460-059 $16.12 148-460-060 $16.12 148-460-061 $16.12 148-460-062 $16.12 148-460-063 $16.12 148-460-064 $16.12 148-460-065 $16.12 148-460-066 $16.12 148-460-067 $16.12 148-460-068 $16.12 148-460-069 $16.12 148-460-070 $16.12 148-460-071 $16.12 148-460-072 $16.12 148-460-073 $16.12 148-460-074 $16.12 148-460-075 $16.12 148-460-076 $16.12 148-460-077 $16.12 148-460-078 $16.12 148-460-079 $16.12 148-460-080 $16.12 148-460-081 $16.12 148-460-082 $16.12 148-460-083 $16.12 148-460-084 $16.12 148-460-085 $16.12 148-460-086 $16.12 148-460-087 $16.12 148-460-088 $16.12 148-460-089 $16.12 148-460-090 $16.12 148-460-091 $16.12 148-460-092 $16.12 148-460-093 $16.12 148-460-094 $16.12 148-460-095 $16.12 148-460-096 $16.12 148-460-097 $16.12 148-460-098 $16.12 148-460-099 $16.12 148-460-100 $16.12 148-460-101 $16.12 148-460-102 $16.12 148-460-103 $16.12 148-460-104 $16.12 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 148-460-105 $16.12 148-460-107 $16.12 148-460-108 $16.12 148-460-109 $16.12 148-460-110 $16.12 148-460-111 $16.12 148-460-112 $16.12 148-460-113 $16.12 148-460-114 $16.12 148-460-115 $16.12 148-460-116 $16.12 148-460-117 $16.12 148-460-118 $16.12 148-460-119 $16.12 148-460-120 $16.12 148-460-121 $16.12 148-460-122 $16.12 148-460-123 $16.12 148-460-124 $16.12 148-460-125 $16.12 148-460-126 $16.12 148-460-127 $16.12 148-460-128 $16.12 148-460-129 $16.12 148-460-130 $16.12 148-460-131 $16.12 148-460-132 $16.12 148-460-133 $16.12 148-460-134 $16.12 148-460-135 $16.12 148-460-136 $16.12 148-460-137 $16.12 148-460-138 $16.12 148-460-139 $16.12 148-460-140 $16.12 148-460-141 $16.12 148-460-142 $16.12 148-460-143 $16.12 148-460-144 $16.12 148-460-145 $16.12 148-460-146 $16.12 148-460-147 $16.12 148-460-148 $16.12 148-460-149 $16.12 148-460-150 $16.12 148-460-151 $16.12 148-460-152 $16.12 148-460-153 $16.12 148-460-154 $16.12 148-460-155 $16.12 148-460-156 $16.12 148-460-157 $16.12 148-460-158 $16.12 148-460-159 $16.12 148-460-160 $16.12 148-460-161 $16.12 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 148-460-162 $16.12 148-460-163 $16.12 148-460-164 $16.12 148-460-165 $16.12 148-460-166 $16.12 148-470-001 $5,394.56 148-470-002 $5,686.32 148-480-010 $244.38 148-480-011 $5,676.82 148-500-001 $16.12 148-500-002 $16.12 148-500-003 $16.12 148-500-004 $16.12 148-500-005 $16.12 148-500-006 $16.12 148-500-007 $16.12 148-500-008 $16.12 148-500-009 $16.12 148-500-010 $16.12 148-500-011 $16.12 148-500-012 $16.12 148-500-013 $16.12 148-500-014 $16.12 148-500-015 $16.12 148-500-016 $16.12 148-500-017 $16.12 148-500-018 $16.12 148-500-019 $16.12 148-500-020 $16.12 148-500-021 $16.12 148-500-022 $16.12 148-500-023 $16.12 148-500-024 $16.12 148-500-025 $16.12 148-500-026 $16.12 148-500-027 $16.12 148-500-028 $16.12 148-500-029 $16.12 148-500-030 $16.12 148-500-031 $16.12 148-500-032 $16.12 148-500-033 $16.12 148-500-034 $16.12 148-500-035 $16.12 148-500-036 $16.12 148-500-037 $16.12 148-500-038 $16.12 148-500-039 $16.12 148-500-040 $16.12 148-500-041 $16.12 148-500-042 $16.12 148-500-043 $16.12 148-500-044 $16.12 148-500-045 $16.12 148-500-046 $16.12 148-500-047 $16.12 11 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 596 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 7 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2834 MO LEVY CODE: Pleasant Hill BART RDA Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 148-500-048 $16.12 148-500-049 $16.12 148-500-050 $16.12 148-500-051 $16.12 148-500-052 $16.12 148-500-053 $16.12 148-500-054 $16.12 148-500-056 $701.22 172-011-022 $7,396.18 172-020-042 $3,630.06 172-020-046 $16.12 172-020-047 $5,834.14 172-031-022 $2,412.52 172-031-023 $4,074.48 172-051-002 $16.12 172-051-007 $16.12 172-051-008 $16.12 172-051-009 $16.12 172-051-010 $16.12 172-051-011 $16.12 172-051-012 $16.12 172-051-013 $16.12 148-221-041 $3,743.06 148-221-042 $3,501.26 148-221-044 $596.44 148-480-014 $7,444.86 250Total Parcels: $81,433.62 Total Assessment: 12 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 597 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 10 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2836 ME LEVY CODE: Viewpointe - Bay Point Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 098-520-001 $151.86 098-520-002 $151.86 098-520-003 $151.86 098-520-004 $151.86 098-520-005 $151.86 098-520-006 $151.86 098-520-007 $151.86 098-520-008 $151.86 098-520-009 $151.86 098-520-010 $151.86 098-520-011 $151.86 098-520-012 $151.86 098-520-013 $151.86 098-520-014 $151.86 098-520-015 $151.86 098-520-016 $151.86 098-520-017 $151.86 098-520-018 $151.86 098-520-019 $151.86 098-520-020 $151.86 098-520-021 $151.86 098-520-022 $151.86 098-520-023 $151.86 098-520-024 $151.86 098-520-025 $151.86 098-520-026 $151.86 098-520-027 $151.86 098-520-028 $151.86 098-520-029 $151.86 098-520-030 $151.86 098-520-031 $151.86 098-520-032 $151.86 098-520-033 $151.86 098-520-034 $151.86 098-520-043 $151.86 098-520-044 $151.86 098-520-045 $151.86 098-520-046 $151.86 098-520-047 $151.86 098-520-048 $151.86 098-520-049 $151.86 098-520-050 $151.86 098-520-051 $151.86 098-520-052 $151.86 098-520-053 $151.86 098-520-054 $151.86 098-520-055 $151.86 098-520-056 $151.86 098-520-057 $151.86 098-520-058 $151.86 098-520-059 $151.86 098-520-060 $151.86 098-520-061 $151.86 098-520-062 $151.86 098-520-063 $151.86 098-520-064 $151.86 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 098-520-065 $151.86 098-520-066 $151.86 098-520-067 $151.86 098-520-068 $151.86 098-520-069 $151.86 098-520-070 $151.86 098-520-071 $151.86 098-520-072 $151.86 098-520-073 $151.86 098-520-074 $151.86 098-520-075 $151.86 098-520-076 $151.86 098-520-077 $151.86 098-520-078 $151.86 098-520-079 $151.86 098-520-080 $151.86 098-520-081 $151.86 098-520-082 $151.86 098-520-083 $151.86 098-520-084 $151.86 098-520-085 $151.86 098-520-086 $151.86 098-520-087 $151.86 098-520-088 $151.86 098-520-089 $151.86 098-520-090 $151.86 098-520-091 $151.86 098-520-092 $151.86 098-520-093 $151.86 098-520-094 $151.86 098-520-095 $151.86 098-520-096 $151.86 098-520-097 $151.86 098-530-001 $151.86 098-530-002 $151.86 098-530-003 $151.86 098-530-004 $151.86 098-530-005 $151.86 098-530-006 $151.86 098-530-007 $151.86 098-530-008 $151.86 098-530-009 $151.86 098-530-010 $151.86 098-530-011 $151.86 098-530-012 $151.86 098-530-013 $151.86 098-530-014 $151.86 098-530-015 $151.86 098-530-016 $151.86 098-530-017 $151.86 098-530-018 $151.86 098-530-019 $151.86 098-530-020 $151.86 098-530-021 $151.86 098-530-022 $151.86 098-530-023 $151.86 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 098-530-024 $151.86 098-530-025 $151.86 098-530-026 $151.86 098-530-027 $151.86 098-530-028 $151.86 098-530-029 $151.86 098-530-030 $151.86 119Total Parcels: $18,071.34 Total Assessment: 13 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 598 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 11 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2839 MF LEVY CODE: Hilltop Commons - San Pablo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 405-170-010 $6,000.00 1Total Parcels: $6,000.00 Total Assessment: 14 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 599 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 17 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2844 LQ LEVY CODE: Shadow Creek - Camino Tassajara Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 220-341-001 $150.00 220-341-002 $150.00 220-341-003 $150.00 220-341-004 $150.00 220-341-005 $150.00 220-341-006 $150.00 220-341-007 $150.00 220-341-008 $150.00 220-341-009 $150.00 220-341-010 $150.00 220-341-011 $150.00 220-341-012 $150.00 220-341-013 $150.00 220-341-014 $150.00 220-341-015 $150.00 220-341-016 $150.00 220-341-017 $150.00 220-342-001 $150.00 220-342-002 $150.00 220-342-003 $150.00 220-342-004 $150.00 220-342-005 $150.00 220-342-006 $150.00 220-342-007 $150.00 220-342-008 $150.00 220-342-009 $150.00 220-343-001 $150.00 220-343-002 $150.00 220-343-003 $150.00 220-343-004 $150.00 220-343-005 $150.00 220-343-006 $150.00 220-343-007 $150.00 220-343-008 $150.00 220-343-009 $150.00 220-343-010 $150.00 220-343-011 $150.00 220-343-012 $150.00 220-343-013 $150.00 220-343-014 $150.00 220-343-015 $150.00 220-343-016 $150.00 220-343-017 $150.00 220-343-018 $150.00 220-343-019 $150.00 220-343-020 $150.00 220-343-021 $150.00 220-343-022 $150.00 220-343-023 $150.00 220-343-024 $150.00 220-343-025 $150.00 220-343-026 $150.00 220-343-027 $150.00 220-343-028 $150.00 220-343-029 $150.00 220-343-030 $150.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 220-343-031 $150.00 220-343-032 $150.00 220-343-033 $150.00 220-343-034 $150.00 220-343-035 $150.00 220-343-036 $150.00 220-343-037 $150.00 220-343-038 $150.00 220-343-039 $150.00 220-343-040 $150.00 220-343-041 $150.00 220-343-042 $150.00 220-343-043 $150.00 220-343-044 $150.00 220-343-045 $150.00 220-343-046 $150.00 220-343-047 $150.00 220-343-048 $150.00 220-343-049 $150.00 220-343-050 $150.00 220-343-051 $150.00 220-371-001 $150.00 220-371-002 $150.00 220-371-003 $150.00 220-371-004 $150.00 220-371-005 $150.00 220-371-006 $150.00 220-371-007 $150.00 220-371-008 $150.00 220-371-009 $150.00 220-371-010 $150.00 220-371-011 $150.00 220-371-012 $150.00 220-371-013 $150.00 220-371-014 $150.00 220-371-015 $150.00 220-371-016 $150.00 220-371-017 $150.00 220-371-018 $150.00 220-371-019 $150.00 220-371-020 $150.00 220-371-021 $150.00 220-371-022 $150.00 220-371-023 $150.00 220-371-024 $150.00 220-371-025 $150.00 220-371-026 $150.00 220-371-027 $150.00 220-371-028 $150.00 220-371-029 $150.00 220-371-030 $150.00 220-371-031 $150.00 220-371-032 $150.00 220-371-033 $150.00 220-371-034 $150.00 220-371-035 $150.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 220-371-036 $150.00 220-371-037 $150.00 220-371-038 $150.00 220-371-039 $150.00 220-371-040 $150.00 220-371-041 $150.00 220-371-042 $150.00 220-371-043 $150.00 220-371-044 $150.00 220-371-045 $150.00 220-371-046 $150.00 220-371-047 $150.00 220-371-048 $150.00 220-371-049 $150.00 220-371-050 $150.00 220-371-051 $150.00 220-371-052 $150.00 220-371-053 $150.00 220-371-054 $150.00 220-371-055 $150.00 220-371-056 $150.00 220-371-057 $150.00 220-371-058 $150.00 220-371-059 $150.00 220-371-060 $150.00 220-371-061 $150.00 220-372-001 $150.00 220-372-002 $150.00 220-372-003 $150.00 220-372-004 $150.00 220-372-005 $150.00 220-372-006 $150.00 220-372-007 $150.00 220-372-008 $150.00 220-372-009 $150.00 220-372-010 $150.00 220-372-011 $150.00 220-372-012 $150.00 220-372-013 $150.00 220-372-014 $150.00 220-372-015 $150.00 220-372-017 $150.00 220-381-002 $150.00 220-381-003 $150.00 220-381-004 $150.00 220-381-005 $150.00 220-381-006 $150.00 220-381-007 $150.00 220-381-008 $150.00 220-381-009 $150.00 220-381-010 $150.00 220-381-011 $150.00 220-381-012 $150.00 220-381-013 $150.00 220-381-014 $150.00 220-381-015 $150.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 220-381-016 $150.00 220-381-017 $150.00 220-381-018 $150.00 220-381-019 $150.00 220-381-021 $150.00 220-382-001 $150.00 220-382-002 $150.00 220-382-003 $150.00 220-383-001 $150.00 220-383-002 $150.00 220-383-003 $150.00 220-383-004 $150.00 220-383-005 $150.00 220-383-006 $150.00 220-383-007 $150.00 220-383-008 $150.00 220-383-009 $150.00 220-383-010 $150.00 220-383-011 $150.00 220-383-012 $150.00 220-383-013 $150.00 220-383-014 $150.00 220-383-015 $150.00 220-383-016 $150.00 220-383-017 $150.00 220-383-018 $150.00 220-383-019 $150.00 220-383-020 $150.00 220-383-021 $150.00 220-383-022 $150.00 220-383-023 $150.00 220-383-024 $150.00 220-383-025 $150.00 220-721-001 $150.00 220-721-002 $150.00 220-722-001 $150.00 220-722-002 $150.00 220-722-003 $150.00 220-722-004 $150.00 220-722-005 $150.00 220-722-006 $150.00 220-722-007 $150.00 220-722-008 $150.00 220-722-009 $150.00 220-722-010 $150.00 220-722-011 $150.00 220-722-012 $150.00 220-722-013 $150.00 220-722-014 $150.00 220-722-015 $150.00 220-722-016 $150.00 220-722-017 $150.00 220-722-018 $150.00 220-722-019 $150.00 220-722-020 $150.00 220-722-021 $150.00 15 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 600 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 17 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2844 LQ LEVY CODE: Shadow Creek - Camino Tassajara Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 220-722-022 $150.00 220-722-023 $150.00 220-722-024 $150.00 220-723-001 $150.00 220-723-002 $150.00 220-723-003 $150.00 220-723-004 $150.00 220-723-005 $150.00 220-723-006 $150.00 220-723-007 $150.00 220-723-008 $150.00 220-723-009 $150.00 220-723-010 $150.00 220-723-011 $150.00 220-723-012 $150.00 220-723-013 $150.00 220-723-014 $150.00 220-724-003 $150.00 220-724-004 $150.00 220-724-005 $150.00 220-724-006 $150.00 220-724-007 $150.00 220-725-001 $150.00 220-725-002 $150.00 220-725-003 $150.00 220-725-004 $150.00 220-725-005 $150.00 220-725-006 $150.00 220-725-007 $150.00 220-725-008 $150.00 220-725-009 $150.00 220-725-010 $150.00 220-725-011 $150.00 220-725-012 $150.00 220-725-013 $150.00 220-725-014 $150.00 220-725-015 $150.00 220-725-016 $150.00 220-725-017 $150.00 220-725-018 $150.00 220-725-019 $150.00 220-725-020 $150.00 220-725-021 $150.00 220-725-022 $150.00 220-725-023 $150.00 220-725-024 $150.00 220-725-025 $150.00 220-725-026 $150.00 220-725-027 $150.00 220-725-028 $150.00 220-725-029 $150.00 220-725-030 $150.00 220-725-031 $150.00 220-725-032 $150.00 220-725-033 $150.00 220-725-034 $150.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 220-725-035 $150.00 220-726-001 $150.00 220-726-002 $150.00 220-726-003 $150.00 220-726-004 $150.00 220-726-005 $150.00 220-726-006 $150.00 220-731-001 $150.00 220-731-002 $150.00 220-731-003 $150.00 220-732-001 $150.00 220-732-002 $150.00 220-732-003 $150.00 220-732-004 $150.00 220-732-005 $150.00 220-732-006 $150.00 220-732-007 $150.00 220-732-008 $150.00 220-732-009 $150.00 220-732-010 $150.00 220-732-011 $150.00 220-732-012 $150.00 220-732-013 $150.00 220-732-014 $150.00 220-732-015 $150.00 220-732-016 $150.00 220-732-017 $150.00 220-732-018 $150.00 220-733-001 $150.00 220-733-002 $150.00 220-733-003 $150.00 220-733-004 $150.00 220-733-005 $150.00 220-734-001 $150.00 220-734-002 $150.00 220-734-003 $150.00 220-734-004 $150.00 220-734-005 $150.00 220-734-006 $150.00 220-734-007 $150.00 220-734-008 $150.00 220-734-009 $150.00 220-734-010 $150.00 220-734-011 $150.00 220-734-012 $150.00 220-734-013 $150.00 220-734-014 $150.00 220-734-015 $150.00 220-734-016 $150.00 220-734-017 $150.00 220-734-018 $150.00 220-735-001 $150.00 220-735-002 $150.00 220-735-003 $150.00 220-735-004 $150.00 220-735-005 $150.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 220-735-006 $150.00 220-736-001 $150.00 220-736-002 $150.00 220-736-003 $150.00 220-736-004 $150.00 220-736-005 $150.00 220-737-001 $150.00 220-737-002 $150.00 220-737-003 $150.00 220-737-004 $150.00 220-737-005 $150.00 220-737-006 $150.00 220-738-001 $150.00 220-738-002 $150.00 220-738-003 $150.00 220-738-004 $150.00 220-739-001 $150.00 220-739-002 $150.00 220-739-003 $150.00 220-739-004 $150.00 220-741-001 $150.00 220-741-002 $150.00 220-741-003 $150.00 220-741-004 $150.00 220-741-005 $150.00 220-741-006 $150.00 220-741-007 $150.00 220-741-008 $150.00 220-741-011 $150.00 220-741-012 $150.00 220-741-013 $150.00 220-741-014 $150.00 220-741-015 $150.00 220-741-016 $150.00 220-741-017 $150.00 220-741-018 $150.00 220-741-019 $150.00 220-741-020 $150.00 220-741-021 $150.00 220-741-022 $150.00 220-741-023 $150.00 220-741-024 $150.00 220-741-025 $150.00 220-741-026 $150.00 220-741-027 $150.00 220-741-028 $150.00 220-741-029 $150.00 220-741-030 $150.00 220-741-031 $150.00 220-741-032 $150.00 220-741-033 $150.00 220-741-034 $150.00 220-741-035 $150.00 220-741-036 $150.00 220-741-037 $150.00 220-741-038 $150.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 220-741-039 $150.00 220-741-040 $150.00 220-741-041 $150.00 220-741-042 $150.00 220-741-043 $150.00 220-741-044 $150.00 220-741-045 $150.00 220-741-046 $150.00 220-741-047 $150.00 220-741-054 $150.00 220-741-056 $150.00 220-741-057 $150.00 220-741-058 $150.00 220-741-059 $150.00 220-741-060 $150.00 220-741-061 $150.00 220-741-062 $150.00 220-741-063 $150.00 220-742-001 $150.00 220-742-002 $150.00 220-742-003 $150.00 220-742-004 $150.00 220-742-005 $150.00 220-742-006 $150.00 220-742-007 $150.00 220-742-008 $150.00 220-742-009 $150.00 220-742-010 $150.00 220-742-011 $150.00 220-742-012 $150.00 220-742-013 $150.00 220-742-014 $150.00 220-742-015 $150.00 220-742-016 $150.00 220-742-017 $150.00 220-742-018 $150.00 220-742-019 $150.00 220-830-001 $150.00 220-830-002 $150.00 220-830-003 $150.00 220-830-004 $150.00 220-830-005 $150.00 220-830-006 $150.00 220-830-007 $150.00 220-830-008 $150.00 220-830-009 $150.00 220-830-010 $150.00 220-830-011 $150.00 220-830-012 $150.00 220-830-013 $150.00 220-830-014 $150.00 220-830-015 $150.00 220-830-016 $150.00 220-830-017 $150.00 220-830-018 $150.00 220-830-019 $150.00 16 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 601 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 17 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2844 LQ LEVY CODE: Shadow Creek - Camino Tassajara Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 220-830-020 $150.00 220-830-021 $150.00 220-830-022 $150.00 220-830-023 $150.00 220-830-024 $150.00 220-830-025 $150.00 220-830-026 $150.00 220-830-027 $150.00 220-830-028 $150.00 220-830-029 $150.00 220-830-030 $150.00 220-830-031 $150.00 220-830-032 $150.00 220-830-033 $150.00 220-830-034 $150.00 220-830-035 $150.00 220-830-036 $150.00 220-840-001 $150.00 220-840-002 $150.00 220-840-003 $150.00 220-840-004 $150.00 220-840-005 $150.00 220-840-006 $150.00 220-840-007 $150.00 220-840-008 $150.00 220-840-009 $150.00 220-840-010 $150.00 220-840-011 $150.00 220-840-012 $150.00 477Total Parcels: $71,550.00 Total Assessment: 17 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 602 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 18 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2843 MW LEVY CODE: Pacheco Manor Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 125-155-029 $175.94 125-155-030 $175.94 125-155-031 $175.94 125-155-032 $175.94 125-155-033 $175.94 125-155-034 $175.94 125-155-035 $175.94 125-155-036 $175.94 125-155-037 $175.94 125-155-038 $175.94 125-155-039 $175.94 125-155-040 $175.94 125-155-041 $175.94 125-155-042 $175.94 125-155-043 $175.94 125-155-044 $175.94 125-155-045 $175.94 125-155-046 $175.94 125-155-047 $175.94 125-155-048 $175.94 125-155-049 $175.94 125-155-050 $175.94 22Total Parcels: $3,870.68 Total Assessment: 18 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 603 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 19 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2849 MI LEVY CODE: Hidden Pond - Reliez Valley Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 365-470-001 $200.00 365-470-002 $200.00 365-470-003 $200.00 365-470-004 $200.00 365-470-005 $200.00 365-470-006 $200.00 365-470-007 $200.00 365-470-008 $200.00 365-470-009 $200.00 365-470-010 $200.00 365-470-011 $200.00 365-470-012 $200.00 365-470-013 $200.00 365-470-014 $200.00 365-470-015 $200.00 365-470-016 $200.00 365-470-017 $200.00 365-470-018 $200.00 365-470-019 $200.00 365-470-020 $200.00 365-470-021 $200.00 365-470-022 $200.00 365-470-023 $200.00 365-470-024 $200.00 365-470-025 $200.00 365-470-026 $200.00 365-470-027 $200.00 365-490-001 $200.00 365-490-002 $200.00 365-490-003 $200.00 365-490-004 $200.00 365-490-005 $200.00 365-490-006 $200.00 365-490-007 $200.00 365-490-008 $200.00 365-490-009 $200.00 365-490-010 $200.00 365-490-011 $200.00 365-490-012 $200.00 365-490-013 $200.00 365-490-014 $200.00 365-490-015 $200.00 365-490-016 $200.00 365-490-018 $200.00 365-490-019 $200.00 365-490-020 $200.00 365-490-021 $200.00 365-490-025 $200.00 365-500-001 $200.00 365-500-002 $200.00 365-500-003 $200.00 365-500-004 $200.00 365-500-005 $200.00 365-500-006 $200.00 365-500-007 $200.00 365-500-008 $200.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 365-500-009 $200.00 365-500-010 $200.00 365-500-011 $200.00 365-500-012 $200.00 365-500-013 $200.00 365-500-014 $200.00 365-500-015 $200.00 365-500-016 $200.00 365-500-017 $200.00 365-500-018 $200.00 365-500-019 $200.00 365-500-020 $200.00 365-500-021 $200.00 365-510-001 $200.00 365-510-002 $200.00 365-510-003 $200.00 365-510-004 $200.00 365-510-005 $200.00 365-510-006 $200.00 365-510-007 $200.00 365-510-008 $200.00 365-510-009 $200.00 365-510-010 $200.00 365-510-011 $200.00 365-510-012 $200.00 365-510-013 $200.00 365-520-001 $200.00 365-520-002 $200.00 365-520-003 $200.00 365-520-004 $200.00 365-520-005 $200.00 365-520-006 $200.00 365-520-007 $200.00 365-520-008 $200.00 365-520-009 $200.00 365-520-010 $200.00 365-520-011 $200.00 365-520-012 $200.00 365-520-013 $200.00 365-520-014 $200.00 365-520-015 $200.00 365-520-016 $200.00 365-520-017 $200.00 365-520-018 $200.00 365-520-019 $200.00 365-520-020 $200.00 365-520-021 $200.00 365-520-022 $200.00 365-520-023 $200.00 365-520-024 $200.00 365-520-025 $200.00 365-520-026 $200.00 365-530-001 $200.00 365-530-002 $200.00 365-530-003 $200.00 365-530-004 $200.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 365-530-005 $200.00 365-530-006 $200.00 365-530-007 $200.00 365-530-008 $200.00 365-530-009 $200.00 365-530-010 $200.00 365-530-011 $200.00 365-530-012 $200.00 365-530-013 $200.00 365-530-014 $200.00 365-530-015 $200.00 365-530-016 $200.00 365-530-017 $200.00 365-530-018 $200.00 365-530-019 $200.00 365-530-020 $200.00 365-530-021 $200.00 365-530-022 $200.00 130Total Parcels: $26,000.00 Total Assessment: 19 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 604 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 21 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2846 LW LEVY CODE: Kensington Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 570-011-002 $13.66 570-011-003 $13.66 570-011-004 $13.66 570-011-005 $13.66 570-011-006 $13.66 570-011-007 $13.66 570-011-008 $13.66 570-011-009 $13.66 570-011-010 $13.66 570-011-011 $13.66 570-011-012 $13.66 570-011-013 $13.66 570-011-014 $13.66 570-012-001 $13.66 570-012-002 $13.66 570-012-003 $13.66 570-012-004 $13.66 570-012-005 $13.66 570-012-008 $13.66 570-012-009 $13.66 570-012-010 $13.66 570-012-011 $13.66 570-012-012 $13.66 570-012-013 $13.66 570-012-014 $13.66 570-012-015 $13.66 570-012-016 $13.66 570-020-001 $13.66 570-020-002 $13.66 570-020-003 $13.66 570-020-004 $13.66 570-020-005 $13.66 570-020-006 $13.66 570-020-007 $6.82 570-020-010 $13.66 570-020-011 $13.66 570-020-012 $13.66 570-020-013 $13.66 570-020-014 $13.66 570-020-015 $13.66 570-031-001 $13.66 570-031-002 $13.66 570-031-003 $13.66 570-031-004 $13.66 570-031-005 $13.66 570-031-006 $13.66 570-031-007 $13.66 570-031-008 $13.66 570-031-009 $13.66 570-031-010 $13.66 570-031-011 $13.66 570-031-012 $13.66 570-031-013 $13.66 570-031-014 $13.66 570-032-001 $13.66 570-032-002 $13.66 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 570-032-003 $13.66 570-032-004 $13.66 570-032-005 $13.66 570-032-006 $13.66 570-032-007 $13.66 570-032-008 $13.66 570-032-009 $13.66 570-032-010 $13.66 570-032-011 $13.66 570-032-012 $13.66 570-032-013 $13.66 570-032-014 $13.66 570-032-015 $13.66 570-032-016 $13.66 570-032-017 $13.66 570-032-018 $13.66 570-032-019 $13.66 570-032-020 $13.66 570-032-021 $13.66 570-032-022 $13.66 570-032-023 $13.66 570-032-024 $13.66 570-032-025 $13.66 570-032-026 $13.66 570-032-027 $13.66 570-032-028 $13.66 570-032-029 $13.66 570-032-030 $13.66 570-032-031 $13.66 570-041-001 $13.66 570-041-002 $13.66 570-041-003 $13.66 570-041-004 $13.66 570-041-005 $13.66 570-041-006 $13.66 570-041-007 $13.66 570-041-008 $13.66 570-041-009 $13.66 570-041-010 $13.66 570-041-011 $13.66 570-041-012 $13.66 570-041-013 $13.66 570-041-014 $13.66 570-041-015 $13.66 570-041-016 $13.66 570-041-017 $13.66 570-041-018 $13.66 570-041-019 $13.66 570-041-021 $13.66 570-041-022 $13.66 570-041-023 $13.66 570-041-024 $13.66 570-041-025 $13.66 570-042-001 $13.66 570-042-002 $13.66 570-042-003 $13.66 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 570-042-004 $13.66 570-042-005 $13.66 570-042-006 $13.66 570-042-007 $13.66 570-042-008 $13.66 570-042-009 $13.66 570-042-010 $13.66 570-042-011 $13.66 570-042-012 $13.66 570-042-013 $13.66 570-042-014 $13.66 570-042-015 $13.66 570-042-016 $13.66 570-042-017 $13.66 570-042-018 $13.66 570-042-019 $13.66 570-042-020 $13.66 570-042-021 $13.66 570-050-001 $13.66 570-050-002 $13.66 570-050-003 $13.66 570-050-004 $13.66 570-050-005 $13.66 570-050-006 $13.66 570-050-007 $13.66 570-050-008 $13.66 570-050-009 $13.66 570-050-010 $13.66 570-050-011 $13.66 570-050-012 $13.66 570-050-013 $13.66 570-050-014 $13.66 570-050-017 $13.66 570-050-018 $13.66 570-050-019 $13.66 570-050-020 $13.66 570-050-022 $13.66 570-050-023 $13.66 570-050-024 $13.66 570-050-025 $13.66 570-050-026 $13.66 570-050-027 $13.66 570-060-001 $13.66 570-060-002 $13.66 570-060-003 $13.66 570-060-004 $13.66 570-060-005 $13.66 570-060-006 $13.66 570-060-007 $13.66 570-060-008 $13.66 570-060-009 $13.66 570-060-010 $13.66 570-060-011 $13.66 570-060-012 $13.66 570-060-013 $13.66 570-060-014 $13.66 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 570-060-017 $13.66 570-060-018 $13.66 570-060-019 $13.66 570-060-020 $13.66 570-060-021 $13.66 570-060-022 $13.66 570-060-023 $13.66 570-071-001 $13.66 570-071-002 $13.66 570-071-003 $13.66 570-071-004 $13.66 570-071-005 $13.66 570-071-006 $13.66 570-071-007 $13.66 570-071-008 $13.66 570-071-009 $13.66 570-071-010 $13.66 570-072-001 $13.66 570-072-002 $13.66 570-072-003 $13.66 570-072-004 $13.66 570-072-005 $13.66 570-072-006 $13.66 570-072-007 $13.66 570-072-008 $13.66 570-072-009 $13.66 570-072-010 $13.66 570-072-011 $13.66 570-072-012 $13.66 570-072-013 $13.66 570-072-014 $13.66 570-081-001 $13.66 570-081-002 $13.66 570-081-003 $13.66 570-081-004 $13.66 570-081-005 $13.66 570-081-007 $13.66 570-081-008 $13.66 570-081-009 $13.66 570-081-010 $13.66 570-081-011 $13.66 570-081-012 $13.66 570-081-013 $13.66 570-082-001 $13.66 570-082-002 $13.66 570-082-003 $13.66 570-082-004 $13.66 570-082-005 $13.66 570-082-006 $13.66 570-082-007 $13.66 570-082-008 $13.66 570-082-009 $13.66 570-082-010 $13.66 570-082-011 $13.66 570-082-012 $13.66 570-082-013 $13.66 20 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 605 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 21 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2846 LW LEVY CODE: Kensington Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 570-082-014 $13.66 570-082-015 $13.66 570-082-016 $13.66 570-091-001 $13.66 570-091-002 $13.66 570-091-003 $13.66 570-091-004 $13.66 570-091-005 $13.66 570-091-006 $13.66 570-091-007 $13.66 570-092-001 $13.66 570-092-002 $13.66 570-092-003 $13.66 570-092-004 $13.66 570-092-005 $13.66 570-092-006 $13.66 570-092-007 $13.66 570-092-008 $13.66 570-092-009 $13.66 570-092-010 $13.66 570-092-011 $13.66 570-092-012 $13.66 570-092-013 $13.66 570-092-014 $13.66 570-093-001 $13.66 570-093-002 $13.66 570-093-003 $13.66 570-093-004 $13.66 570-093-005 $13.66 570-093-006 $13.66 570-093-007 $13.66 570-093-008 $13.66 570-093-009 $13.66 570-093-010 $13.66 570-093-011 $13.66 570-093-012 $13.66 570-093-013 $13.66 570-100-002 $6.82 570-100-003 $13.66 570-100-005 $13.66 570-100-008 $13.66 570-100-009 $13.66 570-100-010 $13.66 570-100-011 $13.66 570-100-012 $13.66 570-100-013 $13.66 570-100-014 $13.66 570-100-015 $13.66 570-100-016 $13.66 570-100-017 $13.66 570-100-018 $13.66 570-100-019 $13.66 570-100-020 $13.66 570-100-022 $13.66 570-100-023 $13.66 570-100-024 $13.66 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 570-110-001 $13.66 570-110-002 $13.66 570-110-003 $13.66 570-110-004 $13.66 570-110-005 $13.66 570-110-006 $13.66 570-110-007 $13.66 570-110-008 $13.66 570-110-009 $13.66 570-110-010 $13.66 570-110-011 $13.66 570-110-012 $13.66 570-110-013 $13.66 570-110-014 $13.66 570-110-015 $13.66 570-110-016 $13.66 570-121-001 $13.66 570-121-002 $13.66 570-121-003 $13.66 570-121-004 $13.66 570-121-005 $13.66 570-121-006 $13.66 570-121-007 $13.66 570-121-008 $13.66 570-121-009 $13.66 570-121-010 $13.66 570-121-011 $13.66 570-121-014 $13.66 570-121-015 $13.66 570-121-016 $13.66 570-121-017 $13.66 570-121-018 $13.66 570-121-019 $13.66 570-121-020 $13.66 570-122-001 $13.66 570-122-002 $13.66 570-122-003 $13.66 570-122-004 $13.66 570-122-005 $13.66 570-122-011 $13.66 570-122-012 $13.66 570-122-013 $13.66 570-122-014 $13.66 570-122-015 $13.66 570-122-020 $13.66 570-122-025 $13.66 570-130-002 $13.66 570-130-003 $13.66 570-130-004 $13.66 570-130-005 $13.66 570-130-006 $13.66 570-130-007 $13.66 570-130-008 $13.66 570-130-009 $13.66 570-130-010 $13.66 570-130-011 $13.66 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 570-130-012 $13.66 570-130-013 $13.66 570-130-014 $13.66 570-130-015 $13.66 570-130-016 $13.66 570-130-017 $13.66 570-130-018 $13.66 570-130-019 $13.66 570-130-020 $13.66 570-130-021 $13.66 570-130-022 $13.66 570-130-023 $13.66 570-130-024 $13.66 570-130-025 $13.66 570-130-027 $13.66 570-130-031 $6.82 570-130-032 $13.66 570-130-033 $13.66 570-141-001 $13.66 570-141-002 $13.66 570-141-003 $13.66 570-141-004 $13.66 570-141-005 $13.66 570-141-006 $13.66 570-142-001 $13.66 570-142-002 $13.66 570-142-003 $13.66 570-142-004 $13.66 570-142-005 $13.66 570-142-006 $13.66 570-142-007 $13.66 570-142-008 $13.66 570-142-009 $13.66 570-142-010 $13.66 570-142-011 $13.66 570-142-012 $13.66 570-142-013 $13.66 570-142-014 $13.66 570-142-015 $13.66 570-142-016 $13.66 570-142-017 $13.66 570-142-019 $13.66 570-142-020 $13.66 570-142-023 $13.66 570-142-024 $13.66 570-142-025 $13.66 570-142-026 $13.66 570-142-027 $13.66 570-142-028 $13.66 570-142-029 $13.66 570-151-001 $13.66 570-151-002 $13.66 570-151-003 $13.66 570-151-004 $13.66 570-151-005 $13.66 570-151-006 $13.66 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 570-151-007 $13.66 570-151-008 $13.66 570-151-009 $13.66 570-151-010 $13.66 570-151-011 $13.66 570-151-012 $13.66 570-151-013 $13.66 570-151-014 $13.66 570-151-015 $13.66 570-151-016 $13.66 570-151-017 $13.66 570-151-018 $13.66 570-151-019 $13.66 570-151-020 $13.66 570-151-021 $13.66 570-151-022 $13.66 570-151-023 $13.66 570-151-024 $13.66 570-151-025 $13.66 570-151-026 $13.66 570-151-027 $13.66 570-151-028 $13.66 570-151-029 $13.66 570-152-001 $13.66 570-152-002 $13.66 570-152-003 $13.66 570-152-004 $13.66 570-152-005 $13.66 570-152-006 $13.66 570-152-007 $13.66 570-152-008 $13.66 570-152-009 $13.66 570-152-010 $13.66 570-152-011 $13.66 570-152-012 $13.66 570-152-013 $13.66 570-152-014 $13.66 570-152-015 $13.66 570-152-016 $13.66 570-152-017 $13.66 570-161-001 $13.66 570-161-002 $13.66 570-161-003 $13.66 570-161-004 $13.66 570-161-008 $13.66 570-161-009 $6.82 570-162-001 $13.66 570-162-002 $13.66 570-162-003 $13.66 570-162-004 $13.66 570-162-005 $13.66 570-162-006 $13.66 570-162-007 $13.66 570-162-008 $13.66 570-162-009 $13.66 570-162-010 $13.66 21 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 606 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 21 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2846 LW LEVY CODE: Kensington Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 570-162-011 $13.66 570-162-012 $13.66 570-162-013 $13.66 570-162-014 $13.66 570-162-015 $13.66 570-162-016 $13.66 570-162-017 $13.66 570-162-018 $13.66 570-162-019 $13.66 570-162-020 $13.66 570-162-021 $13.66 570-162-022 $13.66 570-162-023 $13.66 570-162-024 $13.66 570-162-025 $13.66 570-162-026 $13.66 570-162-027 $13.66 570-162-028 $13.66 570-171-001 $13.66 570-171-002 $13.66 570-171-003 $13.66 570-171-004 $13.66 570-171-005 $13.66 570-171-006 $13.66 570-171-007 $13.66 570-171-008 $13.66 570-171-009 $13.66 570-171-010 $13.66 570-171-011 $13.66 570-171-012 $13.66 570-171-013 $13.66 570-171-014 $13.66 570-171-015 $13.66 570-171-016 $13.66 570-172-001 $13.66 570-172-002 $13.66 570-172-003 $13.66 570-172-004 $13.66 570-172-005 $13.66 570-172-006 $13.66 570-172-007 $13.66 570-172-008 $13.66 570-172-009 $13.66 570-172-010 $13.66 570-172-011 $13.66 570-172-012 $13.66 570-172-013 $13.66 570-172-014 $13.66 570-173-002 $13.66 570-173-003 $13.66 570-173-004 $13.66 570-173-005 $13.66 570-173-006 $13.66 570-173-007 $13.66 570-173-008 $13.66 570-173-009 $13.66 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 570-180-001 $13.66 570-180-002 $13.66 570-180-003 $13.66 570-180-004 $13.66 570-180-005 $13.66 570-180-006 $13.66 570-180-007 $13.66 570-180-008 $13.66 570-180-009 $13.66 570-180-010 $13.66 570-180-011 $13.66 570-180-012 $13.66 570-180-013 $13.66 570-180-014 $13.66 570-180-015 $13.66 570-180-016 $13.66 570-180-017 $13.66 570-180-018 $13.66 570-180-019 $13.66 570-180-020 $13.66 570-180-021 $13.66 570-180-022 $13.66 570-180-023 $13.66 570-180-024 $13.66 570-180-025 $13.66 570-180-027 $13.66 570-180-028 $13.66 570-191-001 $13.66 570-191-002 $13.66 570-191-003 $13.66 570-191-004 $13.66 570-191-005 $13.66 570-191-006 $13.66 570-191-007 $13.66 570-191-009 $13.66 570-191-010 $13.66 570-191-011 $13.66 570-191-012 $13.66 570-191-013 $13.66 570-191-014 $13.66 570-192-001 $13.66 570-192-002 $13.66 570-192-003 $13.66 570-192-004 $13.66 570-192-005 $13.66 570-192-006 $13.66 570-192-007 $13.66 570-192-008 $13.66 570-192-009 $13.66 570-192-010 $13.66 570-192-011 $13.66 570-192-012 $13.66 570-192-013 $13.66 570-192-014 $13.66 570-192-015 $13.66 570-192-016 $13.66 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 570-192-017 $13.66 570-192-018 $13.66 570-192-019 $13.66 570-192-020 $13.66 570-192-021 $13.66 570-192-022 $13.66 570-192-023 $13.66 570-192-024 $13.66 570-192-025 $13.66 570-192-026 $13.66 570-192-027 $13.66 570-201-001 $13.66 570-201-002 $13.66 570-201-003 $13.66 570-201-004 $13.66 570-201-005 $13.66 570-201-006 $13.66 570-201-007 $13.66 570-201-008 $13.66 570-202-002 $13.66 570-202-003 $13.66 570-202-004 $13.66 570-202-005 $13.66 570-203-001 $13.66 570-203-002 $13.66 570-203-003 $13.66 570-203-004 $13.66 570-203-005 $13.66 570-203-006 $13.66 570-203-007 $13.66 570-203-008 $13.66 570-203-009 $13.66 570-203-010 $13.66 570-203-011 $13.66 570-203-012 $13.66 570-203-013 $13.66 570-203-014 $13.66 570-221-001 $13.66 570-221-002 $13.66 570-221-003 $13.66 570-221-004 $13.66 570-221-005 $13.66 570-221-006 $13.66 570-221-007 $13.66 570-221-008 $13.66 570-221-009 $13.66 570-221-010 $13.66 570-221-011 $13.66 570-221-012 $13.66 570-221-013 $13.66 570-221-014 $13.66 570-221-015 $13.66 570-222-001 $13.66 570-222-002 $13.66 570-222-003 $13.66 570-222-004 $13.66 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 570-222-005 $13.66 570-222-006 $13.66 570-222-007 $13.66 570-222-008 $13.66 570-222-009 $13.66 570-222-010 $13.66 570-222-011 $13.66 570-222-012 $13.66 570-222-013 $13.66 570-222-014 $13.66 570-222-015 $13.66 570-222-016 $13.66 570-222-017 $13.66 570-222-018 $13.66 570-222-019 $13.66 570-222-020 $13.66 570-222-021 $13.66 570-222-022 $13.66 570-222-023 $13.66 570-222-024 $13.66 570-222-025 $13.66 570-222-026 $13.66 570-222-027 $13.66 570-223-001 $13.66 570-223-002 $13.66 570-223-003 $13.66 570-223-004 $13.66 570-223-005 $13.66 570-223-006 $13.66 570-231-001 $13.66 570-231-002 $13.66 570-231-003 $13.66 570-231-004 $13.66 570-231-005 $13.66 570-231-006 $13.66 570-231-007 $13.66 570-231-008 $13.66 570-231-009 $13.66 570-231-010 $13.66 570-231-011 $13.66 570-231-012 $13.66 570-231-013 $13.66 570-231-014 $13.66 570-231-015 $13.66 570-231-018 $13.66 570-231-019 $13.66 570-232-001 $13.66 570-232-002 $13.66 570-232-003 $13.66 570-232-004 $13.66 570-232-005 $13.66 570-232-006 $13.66 570-232-007 $13.66 570-232-008 $13.66 570-232-009 $13.66 570-232-010 $13.66 22 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 607 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 21 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2846 LW LEVY CODE: Kensington Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 570-232-011 $13.66 570-232-012 $13.66 570-240-003 $13.66 570-251-006 $13.66 570-251-007 $13.66 570-251-008 $13.66 570-251-009 $13.66 570-251-010 $13.66 570-251-011 $13.66 570-251-012 $13.66 570-251-015 $13.66 570-251-016 $13.66 570-251-017 $13.66 570-251-018 $6.82 570-251-020 $6.82 570-251-021 $6.82 570-252-002 $13.66 570-252-003 $13.66 570-252-004 $13.66 570-252-005 $13.66 570-252-006 $13.66 570-252-007 $13.66 570-252-008 $13.66 570-252-009 $13.66 570-252-010 $13.66 570-252-011 $13.66 570-252-012 $13.66 570-252-013 $13.66 570-252-014 $13.66 570-252-015 $13.66 570-252-016 $13.66 570-252-017 $13.66 570-252-018 $13.66 570-252-019 $13.66 570-252-020 $13.66 570-252-021 $13.66 570-252-022 $13.66 570-252-023 $13.66 570-252-024 $13.66 570-252-025 $13.66 570-252-026 $13.66 570-252-027 $13.66 570-252-028 $13.66 570-252-029 $13.66 570-252-030 $13.66 570-252-031 $13.66 570-253-004 $6.82 570-253-005 $6.82 570-253-006 $6.82 570-253-010 $13.66 570-253-011 $13.66 570-253-012 $6.82 570-253-013 $13.66 570-253-014 $13.66 570-253-015 $13.66 570-253-016 $13.66 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 570-253-017 $13.66 570-253-018 $13.66 570-253-019 $13.66 570-253-020 $13.66 570-253-021 $13.66 570-253-022 $13.66 570-253-023 $6.82 570-253-024 $6.82 570-253-025 $6.82 570-253-026 $13.66 570-253-028 $13.66 570-253-029 $13.66 570-253-031 $13.66 570-253-032 $13.66 570-253-033 $13.66 570-253-034 $13.66 570-253-035 $13.66 570-253-036 $13.66 570-253-037 $6.82 570-261-001 $13.66 570-261-002 $13.66 570-261-003 $13.66 570-262-013 $13.66 570-262-014 $13.66 570-262-015 $13.66 570-262-020 $13.66 570-262-021 $13.66 570-262-022 $13.66 570-262-025 $13.66 570-262-026 $13.66 570-262-029 $13.66 570-262-030 $13.66 570-262-032 $13.66 570-262-033 $13.66 570-262-034 $13.66 570-262-035 $13.66 570-262-036 $13.66 570-262-037 $13.66 570-262-038 $13.66 571-010-001 $13.66 571-010-002 $13.66 571-010-003 $13.66 571-010-004 $13.66 571-010-005 $13.66 571-010-006 $13.66 571-010-007 $13.66 571-010-008 $13.66 571-010-009 $13.66 571-010-010 $13.66 571-010-012 $13.66 571-010-013 $13.66 571-010-014 $13.66 571-010-015 $13.66 571-010-016 $13.66 571-010-017 $13.66 571-010-018 $13.66 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 571-010-019 $13.66 571-010-020 $13.66 571-010-021 $13.66 571-010-022 $13.66 571-010-023 $13.66 571-021-001 $13.66 571-021-002 $13.66 571-021-003 $13.66 571-021-004 $13.66 571-021-005 $13.66 571-021-006 $13.66 571-021-007 $13.66 571-021-008 $13.66 571-021-010 $13.66 571-021-011 $13.66 571-021-014 $13.66 571-021-015 $13.66 571-021-016 $13.66 571-021-017 $13.66 571-021-018 $13.66 571-021-019 $13.66 571-021-020 $13.66 571-021-021 $13.66 571-021-022 $13.66 571-021-023 $13.66 571-021-024 $13.66 571-021-026 $13.66 571-021-030 $13.66 571-021-032 $13.66 571-021-033 $13.66 571-021-034 $13.66 571-022-001 $13.66 571-022-003 $13.66 571-022-004 $13.66 571-022-005 $13.66 571-022-006 $13.66 571-022-007 $13.66 571-022-008 $13.66 571-022-009 $13.66 571-022-010 $13.66 571-022-011 $13.66 571-022-012 $13.66 571-022-013 $13.66 571-030-001 $13.66 571-030-002 $13.66 571-030-003 $13.66 571-030-005 $13.66 571-030-006 $13.66 571-030-007 $13.66 571-030-008 $13.66 571-030-009 $13.66 571-030-010 $13.66 571-030-011 $13.66 571-030-012 $13.66 571-030-013 $13.66 571-030-014 $13.66 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 571-030-015 $13.66 571-030-017 $13.66 571-030-018 $13.66 571-030-019 $6.82 571-040-001 $13.66 571-040-002 $13.66 571-040-003 $13.66 571-040-004 $13.66 571-040-005 $13.66 571-040-006 $13.66 571-040-007 $13.66 571-040-008 $13.66 571-050-002 $13.66 571-050-003 $13.66 571-050-009 $13.66 571-050-011 $13.66 571-050-012 $13.66 571-050-013 $13.66 571-050-014 $13.66 571-050-015 $13.66 571-050-017 $13.66 571-050-018 $13.66 571-050-019 $13.66 571-050-021 $13.66 571-050-022 $13.66 571-050-023 $40.98 571-060-002 $13.66 571-060-003 $13.66 571-060-004 $27.32 571-060-005 $13.66 571-060-006 $13.66 571-060-007 $20.48 571-060-008 $20.48 571-060-009 $13.66 571-060-010 $13.66 571-060-011 $13.66 571-070-001 $13.66 571-070-002 $13.66 571-070-003 $13.66 571-070-006 $13.66 571-070-009 $13.66 571-070-010 $6.82 571-070-011 $13.66 571-070-012 $13.66 571-070-013 $13.66 571-070-014 $13.66 571-070-015 $13.66 571-070-016 $13.66 571-070-017 $6.82 571-070-018 $13.66 571-070-019 $13.66 571-080-001 $13.66 571-080-002 $13.66 571-080-003 $13.66 571-080-004 $13.66 571-080-006 $13.66 23 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 608 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 21 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2846 LW LEVY CODE: Kensington Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 571-080-007 $13.66 571-080-008 $13.66 571-080-009 $13.66 571-080-010 $13.66 571-080-011 $13.66 571-080-012 $13.66 571-080-013 $13.66 571-080-014 $13.66 571-080-015 $13.66 571-080-016 $13.66 571-080-017 $13.66 571-080-018 $13.66 571-080-019 $13.66 571-080-020 $13.66 571-080-021 $13.66 571-080-022 $13.66 571-080-025 $13.66 571-090-001 $13.66 571-090-002 $13.66 571-090-003 $13.66 571-090-004 $13.66 571-090-005 $13.66 571-090-006 $13.66 571-090-007 $6.82 571-090-008 $13.66 571-090-011 $13.66 571-090-012 $13.66 571-090-013 $13.66 571-090-014 $13.66 571-090-015 $13.66 571-090-016 $13.66 571-090-017 $13.66 571-090-019 $13.66 571-100-001 $13.66 571-100-002 $13.66 571-100-003 $13.66 571-100-004 $13.66 571-100-005 $13.66 571-100-006 $13.66 571-100-007 $13.66 571-100-008 $13.66 571-100-009 $13.66 571-100-010 $13.66 571-100-011 $13.66 571-100-012 $13.66 571-100-013 $13.66 571-100-014 $13.66 571-100-015 $13.66 571-100-016 $13.66 571-100-017 $13.66 571-110-001 $13.66 571-110-002 $13.66 571-110-003 $13.66 571-110-004 $13.66 571-110-007 $13.66 571-110-008 $13.66 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 571-110-009 $13.66 571-110-010 $13.66 571-110-011 $13.66 571-110-012 $13.66 571-110-013 $13.66 571-110-014 $13.66 571-110-015 $13.66 571-110-016 $13.66 571-110-017 $13.66 571-110-019 $13.66 571-110-020 $13.66 571-110-021 $13.66 571-120-001 $13.66 571-120-002 $13.66 571-120-003 $13.66 571-120-005 $13.66 571-120-006 $13.66 571-120-007 $13.66 571-120-008 $13.66 571-120-010 $13.66 571-120-011 $13.66 571-120-012 $13.66 571-120-013 $13.66 571-120-014 $13.66 571-120-015 $13.66 571-120-016 $13.66 571-120-017 $13.66 571-120-018 $13.66 571-120-019 $13.66 571-120-020 $13.66 571-120-021 $13.66 571-120-022 $13.66 571-120-023 $13.66 571-120-024 $13.66 571-120-025 $13.66 571-120-026 $13.66 571-120-027 $13.66 571-120-028 $13.66 571-130-001 $13.66 571-130-002 $13.66 571-130-003 $13.66 571-130-004 $13.66 571-130-005 $13.66 571-130-006 $13.66 571-130-007 $13.66 571-130-008 $13.66 571-130-009 $13.66 571-130-010 $13.66 571-130-011 $13.66 571-130-012 $13.66 571-130-013 $13.66 571-130-014 $13.66 571-130-015 $13.66 571-130-016 $13.66 571-130-017 $13.66 571-130-018 $13.66 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 571-130-019 $13.66 571-130-020 $20.48 571-130-021 $13.66 571-130-022 $13.66 571-130-023 $13.66 571-130-024 $13.66 571-130-025 $13.66 571-140-001 $13.66 571-140-002 $13.66 571-140-003 $13.66 571-140-004 $13.66 571-140-005 $13.66 571-140-006 $13.66 571-140-007 $13.66 571-140-008 $13.66 571-140-009 $13.66 571-140-010 $13.66 571-140-011 $13.66 571-140-012 $13.66 571-140-013 $13.66 571-140-014 $13.66 571-140-015 $13.66 571-140-016 $13.66 571-140-017 $13.66 571-140-018 $13.66 571-140-022 $13.66 571-140-023 $13.66 571-140-024 $13.66 571-140-025 $13.66 571-140-026 $13.66 571-140-031 $13.66 571-140-032 $13.66 571-150-001 $13.66 571-150-002 $13.66 571-150-003 $13.66 571-150-005 $13.66 571-150-008 $13.66 571-150-010 $13.66 571-150-011 $13.66 571-150-012 $13.66 571-150-013 $13.66 571-150-015 $6.82 571-150-017 $13.66 571-150-019 $13.66 571-150-020 $13.66 571-150-021 $13.66 571-150-022 $13.66 571-150-023 $6.82 571-160-001 $13.66 571-160-002 $13.66 571-160-003 $13.66 571-160-004 $13.66 571-160-006 $13.66 571-160-012 $13.66 571-160-013 $13.66 571-160-014 $13.66 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 571-160-017 $13.66 571-160-019 $6.82 571-160-020 $13.66 571-170-001 $13.66 571-170-002 $13.66 571-170-004 $13.66 571-170-005 $13.66 571-170-006 $13.66 571-170-007 $13.66 571-170-008 $13.66 571-170-010 $13.66 571-170-014 $13.66 571-170-015 $13.66 571-170-016 $13.66 571-170-017 $13.66 571-170-022 $13.66 571-170-023 $13.66 571-170-031 $13.66 571-170-032 $13.66 571-170-034 $13.66 571-170-035 $13.66 571-170-036 $13.66 571-170-037 $6.82 571-170-038 $13.66 571-180-001 $13.66 571-180-002 $13.66 571-180-003 $13.66 571-180-004 $13.66 571-180-005 $13.66 571-180-006 $13.66 571-180-007 $13.66 571-180-009 $13.66 571-180-010 $13.66 571-180-011 $13.66 571-180-012 $13.66 571-180-013 $13.66 571-180-014 $13.66 571-180-017 $13.66 571-190-001 $13.66 571-190-002 $13.66 571-190-003 $13.66 571-190-004 $13.66 571-190-006 $13.66 571-190-007 $13.66 571-190-008 $20.48 571-190-009 $13.66 571-190-010 $13.66 571-190-011 $13.66 571-190-012 $13.66 571-190-013 $13.66 571-190-014 $13.66 571-190-015 $13.66 571-190-016 $13.66 571-190-018 $13.66 571-190-019 $13.66 571-200-001 $13.66 24 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 609 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 21 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2846 LW LEVY CODE: Kensington Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 571-200-002 $13.66 571-200-003 $13.66 571-200-004 $13.66 571-200-005 $13.66 571-200-006 $13.66 571-200-007 $13.66 571-200-008 $13.66 571-200-009 $13.66 571-200-010 $13.66 571-200-011 $13.66 571-200-012 $13.66 571-200-013 $13.66 571-200-014 $13.66 571-200-015 $13.66 571-200-016 $13.66 571-200-017 $13.66 571-211-004 $13.66 571-211-005 $13.66 571-211-006 $13.66 571-211-007 $13.66 571-211-008 $13.66 571-211-009 $13.66 571-211-011 $13.66 571-211-012 $13.66 571-211-013 $20.48 571-212-001 $13.66 571-212-002 $13.66 571-212-004 $13.66 571-212-005 $13.66 571-212-006 $13.66 571-212-007 $13.66 571-212-008 $13.66 571-212-009 $13.66 571-212-010 $13.66 571-212-011 $13.66 571-221-001 $13.66 571-221-002 $13.66 571-221-004 $13.66 571-221-005 $13.66 571-221-006 $13.66 571-221-007 $13.66 571-221-008 $13.66 571-221-009 $13.66 571-221-010 $13.66 571-221-011 $13.66 571-221-012 $13.66 571-222-001 $13.66 571-222-002 $13.66 571-222-003 $13.66 571-222-004 $13.66 571-222-005 $13.66 571-231-001 $13.66 571-231-002 $13.66 571-231-003 $13.66 571-231-004 $13.66 571-231-005 $13.66 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 571-231-006 $13.66 571-232-001 $13.66 571-232-002 $13.66 571-232-003 $13.66 571-232-004 $13.66 571-232-005 $13.66 571-232-006 $13.66 571-240-001 $13.66 571-240-002 $13.66 571-240-003 $13.66 571-240-004 $13.66 571-240-005 $13.66 571-240-006 $13.66 571-240-007 $13.66 571-240-008 $13.66 571-240-009 $13.66 571-240-010 $13.66 571-240-011 $13.66 571-240-012 $13.66 571-240-013 $13.66 571-240-014 $13.66 571-240-018 $6.82 571-240-019 $13.66 571-240-022 $13.66 571-240-023 $13.66 571-240-024 $13.66 571-240-027 $13.66 571-250-003 $13.66 571-250-004 $13.66 571-250-005 $13.66 571-250-006 $13.66 571-250-007 $13.66 571-250-008 $13.66 571-250-009 $13.66 571-250-010 $13.66 571-250-013 $13.66 571-250-014 $13.66 571-250-015 $13.66 571-250-016 $13.66 571-250-017 $13.66 571-250-018 $13.66 571-250-019 $13.66 571-250-020 $13.66 571-250-021 $13.66 571-250-022 $13.66 571-250-023 $13.66 571-250-024 $13.66 571-250-025 $13.66 571-250-026 $13.66 571-250-027 $13.66 571-250-028 $13.66 571-250-029 $13.66 571-250-030 $13.66 571-250-031 $13.66 571-250-032 $13.66 571-250-033 $13.66 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 571-250-034 $13.66 571-260-001 $13.66 571-260-002 $13.66 571-260-003 $13.66 571-260-004 $13.66 571-260-005 $13.66 571-260-006 $13.66 571-260-008 $13.66 571-260-013 $13.66 571-260-014 $13.66 571-260-015 $13.66 571-260-016 $13.66 571-270-001 $13.66 571-270-002 $13.66 571-270-003 $13.66 571-270-004 $13.66 571-270-005 $13.66 571-270-006 $13.66 571-270-007 $13.66 571-270-012 $13.66 571-270-013 $13.66 571-270-014 $13.66 571-270-015 $13.66 571-270-018 $13.66 571-270-019 $13.66 571-270-020 $13.66 571-270-021 $13.66 571-270-022 $13.66 571-270-023 $13.66 571-270-024 $13.66 571-270-025 $13.66 571-270-026 $13.66 571-270-027 $13.66 571-270-029 $13.66 571-270-030 $13.66 571-270-031 $13.66 571-270-032 $13.66 571-270-033 $13.66 571-280-002 $13.66 571-280-003 $13.66 571-280-004 $13.66 571-280-005 $13.66 571-280-008 $13.66 571-280-009 $13.66 571-280-010 $13.66 571-280-012 $13.66 571-280-013 $13.66 571-280-014 $13.66 571-280-015 $13.66 571-280-016 $13.66 571-280-017 $13.66 571-280-018 $13.66 571-280-019 $13.66 571-290-001 $13.66 571-290-002 $13.66 571-290-003 $13.66 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 571-290-004 $13.66 571-290-005 $13.66 571-290-006 $13.66 571-290-007 $13.66 571-290-008 $13.66 571-290-009 $13.66 571-290-010 $13.66 571-290-011 $13.66 571-290-012 $13.66 571-290-013 $13.66 571-290-014 $13.66 571-290-015 $13.66 571-290-016 $13.66 571-290-017 $13.66 571-290-018 $13.66 571-290-019 $13.66 571-290-020 $13.66 571-300-001 $54.64 571-300-002 $13.66 571-300-003 $13.66 571-300-004 $13.66 571-300-005 $13.66 571-300-006 $13.66 571-300-007 $13.66 571-300-008 $13.66 571-300-009 $13.66 571-300-010 $13.66 571-300-011 $13.66 571-300-012 $13.66 571-300-013 $13.66 571-300-014 $13.66 571-300-015 $13.66 571-300-016 $13.66 571-300-017 $13.66 571-300-018 $13.66 571-300-019 $13.66 571-300-020 $13.66 571-300-021 $13.66 571-300-022 $13.66 571-300-023 $13.66 571-300-024 $13.66 571-300-025 $13.66 571-300-026 $13.66 571-300-027 $13.66 571-300-028 $13.66 571-300-029 $13.66 571-300-030 $13.66 571-300-031 $13.66 571-300-032 $13.66 571-311-002 $13.66 571-311-003 $13.66 571-311-004 $13.66 571-311-005 $13.66 571-311-006 $13.66 571-311-007 $13.66 571-311-008 $13.66 25 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 610 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 21 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2846 LW LEVY CODE: Kensington Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 571-311-009 $13.66 571-311-010 $13.66 571-311-011 $13.66 571-311-012 $13.66 571-311-013 $13.66 571-311-014 $13.66 571-311-015 $13.66 571-311-016 $13.66 571-311-017 $13.66 571-311-018 $13.66 571-311-019 $13.66 571-311-020 $13.66 571-311-021 $13.66 571-311-022 $13.66 571-311-023 $13.66 571-311-024 $13.66 571-311-025 $13.66 571-311-026 $13.66 571-311-027 $13.66 571-311-028 $13.66 571-311-029 $13.66 571-311-030 $13.66 571-311-031 $13.66 571-312-001 $13.66 571-312-003 $13.66 571-312-004 $13.66 571-312-005 $13.66 571-312-006 $13.66 571-312-007 $13.66 571-312-008 $13.66 571-312-009 $13.66 571-312-010 $13.66 571-312-012 $13.66 571-312-013 $13.66 571-320-001 $13.66 571-320-002 $13.66 571-320-003 $13.66 571-320-005 $13.66 571-320-006 $13.66 571-320-007 $13.66 571-320-008 $13.66 571-320-009 $13.66 571-320-010 $13.66 571-320-011 $13.66 571-320-012 $13.66 571-320-013 $13.66 571-320-014 $13.66 571-331-001 $13.66 571-331-002 $13.66 571-331-003 $13.66 571-332-001 $13.66 571-332-002 $13.66 571-332-003 $13.66 571-332-004 $13.66 571-332-005 $13.66 571-332-006 $13.66 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 571-332-007 $13.66 571-332-008 $13.66 571-332-009 $13.66 571-332-010 $13.66 571-332-011 $13.66 571-332-013 $13.66 571-332-014 $13.66 571-332-015 $13.66 571-332-016 $13.66 571-332-017 $13.66 571-332-018 $13.66 571-332-019 $13.66 571-340-001 $13.66 571-340-002 $13.66 571-340-003 $13.66 571-340-004 $13.66 571-340-005 $13.66 571-340-006 $13.66 571-340-007 $13.66 571-340-008 $13.66 571-340-009 $13.66 571-340-010 $13.66 571-340-011 $13.66 571-340-012 $13.66 571-340-013 $13.66 571-340-014 $13.66 571-340-015 $13.66 571-340-016 $13.66 571-340-017 $13.66 571-340-018 $13.66 571-340-019 $13.66 571-340-020 $13.66 571-340-021 $13.66 571-340-022 $13.66 571-340-023 $13.66 571-340-024 $13.66 571-340-025 $13.66 571-340-026 $13.66 571-340-027 $13.66 571-340-028 $13.66 571-340-029 $13.66 571-340-030 $13.66 571-340-031 $13.66 571-340-032 $13.66 571-340-033 $13.66 571-340-034 $13.66 571-340-035 $13.66 571-340-036 $13.66 571-350-001 $13.66 571-350-002 $13.66 571-350-003 $13.66 571-350-004 $13.66 571-350-005 $13.66 571-350-006 $13.66 571-350-007 $13.66 571-350-008 $13.66 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 571-350-009 $13.66 571-350-010 $13.66 571-350-011 $13.66 571-350-012 $13.66 571-350-013 $13.66 571-350-014 $13.66 571-350-015 $13.66 571-350-016 $13.66 571-350-017 $13.66 571-350-018 $13.66 571-350-019 $13.66 571-350-020 $13.66 571-350-021 $13.66 571-350-022 $13.66 571-350-023 $13.66 571-350-024 $13.66 571-350-025 $13.66 571-350-026 $13.66 571-350-027 $13.66 571-360-001 $13.66 571-360-003 $13.66 571-360-004 $13.66 571-360-005 $13.66 571-360-006 $13.66 571-360-007 $13.66 572-011-001 $13.66 572-011-002 $13.66 572-011-003 $13.66 572-011-004 $13.66 572-011-005 $13.66 572-011-006 $6.82 572-011-007 $13.66 572-011-008 $13.66 572-011-009 $13.66 572-012-001 $13.66 572-012-002 $13.66 572-012-003 $13.66 572-012-004 $13.66 572-012-005 $13.66 572-012-006 $13.66 572-012-007 $13.66 572-012-008 $13.66 572-012-009 $13.66 572-012-011 $13.66 572-012-012 $13.66 572-012-013 $13.66 572-012-014 $13.66 572-012-015 $13.66 572-012-016 $13.66 572-012-020 $13.66 572-012-021 $13.66 572-012-022 $13.66 572-012-023 $13.66 572-012-024 $13.66 572-012-025 $6.82 572-012-026 $13.66 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 572-012-027 $13.66 572-012-028 $13.66 572-013-001 $13.66 572-013-002 $13.66 572-013-003 $13.66 572-013-004 $13.66 572-013-005 $13.66 572-013-006 $13.66 572-013-007 $13.66 572-013-008 $13.66 572-014-001 $13.66 572-014-002 $13.66 572-014-003 $13.66 572-014-004 $13.66 572-014-005 $13.66 572-014-007 $13.66 572-014-008 $13.66 572-014-009 $13.66 572-014-016 $13.66 572-021-001 $6.82 572-021-002 $13.66 572-021-003 $13.66 572-021-004 $13.66 572-021-005 $13.66 572-021-006 $13.66 572-021-007 $13.66 572-021-008 $13.66 572-021-009 $13.66 572-022-001 $13.66 572-022-002 $13.66 572-022-003 $13.66 572-022-004 $13.66 572-022-005 $13.66 572-022-006 $13.66 572-022-009 $13.66 572-022-010 $13.66 572-022-013 $13.66 572-022-014 $13.66 572-022-015 $13.66 572-022-016 $13.66 572-022-017 $13.66 572-023-001 $13.66 572-023-002 $13.66 572-023-003 $13.66 572-023-004 $13.66 572-023-005 $13.66 572-023-006 $13.66 572-023-007 $13.66 572-023-008 $13.66 572-024-001 $13.66 572-024-002 $13.66 572-024-003 $13.66 572-024-004 $13.66 572-024-005 $13.66 572-024-006 $13.66 572-024-007 $13.66 26 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 611 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 21 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2846 LW LEVY CODE: Kensington Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 572-024-008 $13.66 572-024-009 $13.66 572-024-010 $13.66 572-025-001 $13.66 572-025-002 $13.66 572-025-003 $13.66 572-025-004 $13.66 572-025-005 $13.66 572-025-006 $13.66 572-025-007 $13.66 572-025-008 $13.66 572-025-009 $13.66 572-026-001 $13.66 572-026-002 $13.66 572-026-003 $13.66 572-026-004 $13.66 572-026-005 $13.66 572-026-006 $13.66 572-026-007 $13.66 572-026-008 $13.66 572-026-009 $13.66 572-026-010 $13.66 572-026-011 $13.66 572-026-012 $13.66 572-026-013 $13.66 572-026-014 $13.66 572-026-015 $13.66 572-026-016 $13.66 572-026-017 $13.66 572-026-018 $13.66 572-027-001 $13.66 572-027-002 $13.66 572-027-003 $13.66 572-027-004 $13.66 572-027-005 $13.66 572-027-006 $13.66 572-027-007 $13.66 572-027-008 $13.66 572-027-009 $13.66 572-027-010 $13.66 572-027-011 $13.66 572-027-012 $13.66 572-028-001 $13.66 572-028-002 $13.66 572-028-003 $13.66 572-028-004 $13.66 572-028-005 $13.66 572-028-006 $13.66 572-028-007 $13.66 572-028-008 $13.66 572-028-009 $13.66 572-028-010 $13.66 572-028-011 $13.66 572-029-006 $6.82 572-029-007 $13.66 572-029-008 $13.66 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 572-029-009 $13.66 572-029-011 $13.66 572-029-012 $13.66 572-031-001 $13.66 572-031-002 $13.66 572-031-003 $13.66 572-031-007 $13.66 572-032-001 $13.66 572-032-002 $13.66 572-032-003 $13.66 572-032-004 $13.66 572-032-005 $13.66 572-032-006 $13.66 572-032-007 $13.66 572-032-008 $13.66 572-032-010 $13.66 572-032-012 $13.66 572-032-014 $13.66 572-032-016 $13.66 572-032-017 $13.66 572-032-018 $6.82 572-032-020 $13.66 572-032-023 $13.66 572-032-024 $13.66 572-032-025 $13.66 572-033-003 $13.66 572-033-005 $13.66 572-033-006 $13.66 572-033-007 $13.66 572-033-008 $13.66 572-033-009 $13.66 572-034-004 $13.66 572-034-005 $13.66 572-034-006 $13.66 572-034-007 $13.66 572-034-010 $13.66 572-034-011 $13.66 572-034-012 $13.66 572-034-014 $13.66 572-034-015 $13.66 572-034-016 $13.66 572-034-017 $13.66 572-034-018 $6.82 572-040-013 $16.52 572-050-001 $13.66 572-050-002 $13.66 572-050-005 $13.66 572-050-009 $13.66 572-050-013 $13.66 572-050-016 $13.66 572-050-017 $13.66 572-050-020 $13.66 572-050-021 $13.66 572-050-022 $13.66 572-050-023 $13.66 572-050-024 $13.66 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 572-060-008 $13.66 572-060-009 $13.66 572-060-010 $13.66 572-060-011 $13.66 572-060-012 $13.66 572-060-013 $13.66 572-060-016 $13.66 572-060-017 $13.66 572-060-018 $13.66 572-060-026 $13.66 572-060-027 $13.66 572-060-028 $13.66 572-060-029 $13.66 572-060-030 $13.66 572-060-031 $13.66 572-060-032 $13.66 572-070-001 $13.66 572-070-002 $13.66 572-070-003 $13.66 572-070-011 $13.66 572-070-013 $13.66 572-070-014 $13.66 572-070-015 $13.66 572-070-016 $13.66 572-070-019 $13.66 572-070-020 $13.66 572-080-005 $6.82 572-080-007 $13.66 572-080-008 $13.66 572-080-009 $13.66 572-080-016 $13.66 572-080-017 $6.82 572-080-018 $13.66 572-080-023 $13.66 572-080-024 $13.66 572-080-025 $13.66 572-080-026 $13.66 572-080-028 $13.66 572-080-029 $6.82 572-080-030 $13.66 572-080-031 $6.82 572-080-035 $13.66 572-080-036 $13.66 572-090-001 $13.66 572-090-002 $13.66 572-090-003 $13.66 572-090-004 $13.66 572-090-005 $13.66 572-090-006 $13.66 572-090-007 $13.66 572-090-008 $13.66 572-090-009 $13.66 572-090-010 $13.66 572-090-011 $13.66 572-090-012 $13.66 572-090-013 $13.66 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 572-090-014 $13.66 572-090-015 $13.66 572-090-016 $13.66 572-090-017 $13.66 572-090-018 $13.66 572-090-019 $13.66 572-100-001 $13.66 572-100-002 $13.66 572-100-003 $13.66 572-100-004 $13.66 572-100-005 $13.66 572-100-006 $13.66 572-100-007 $13.66 572-100-008 $6.82 572-100-009 $13.66 572-100-010 $13.66 572-100-011 $13.66 572-100-012 $13.66 572-100-013 $13.66 572-100-014 $13.66 572-100-015 $13.66 572-100-016 $13.66 572-100-017 $13.66 572-100-018 $13.66 572-110-001 $13.66 572-110-002 $13.66 572-110-003 $13.66 572-110-004 $13.66 572-110-005 $13.66 572-110-006 $13.66 572-110-007 $13.66 572-110-008 $13.66 572-110-009 $13.66 572-110-010 $13.66 572-110-011 $13.66 572-110-012 $13.66 572-110-013 $13.66 572-110-014 $13.66 572-110-015 $13.66 572-110-016 $13.66 572-110-017 $13.66 572-110-018 $13.66 572-110-019 $13.66 572-110-020 $13.66 572-110-021 $13.66 572-110-022 $13.66 572-110-023 $13.66 572-110-024 $13.66 572-110-025 $13.66 572-110-029 $13.66 572-121-003 $13.66 572-121-004 $13.66 572-121-005 $13.66 572-121-006 $13.66 572-121-007 $13.66 572-121-008 $13.66 27 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 612 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 21 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2846 LW LEVY CODE: Kensington Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 572-122-001 $13.66 572-122-002 $13.66 572-122-003 $13.66 572-122-004 $13.66 572-122-005 $13.66 572-122-006 $13.66 572-122-007 $13.66 572-122-008 $13.66 572-122-009 $13.66 572-122-010 $13.66 572-122-011 $13.66 572-123-001 $13.66 572-123-002 $13.66 572-123-003 $13.66 572-123-004 $13.66 572-124-001 $13.66 572-124-002 $13.66 572-124-003 $13.66 572-124-004 $13.66 572-124-005 $13.66 572-124-006 $13.66 572-124-007 $13.66 572-124-008 $13.66 572-124-009 $13.66 572-124-010 $13.66 572-124-011 $13.66 572-124-012 $13.66 572-124-013 $13.66 572-124-014 $13.66 572-124-015 $13.66 572-124-016 $13.66 572-124-017 $13.66 572-124-018 $13.66 572-130-001 $13.66 572-130-002 $13.66 572-130-003 $13.66 572-130-004 $13.66 572-130-005 $13.66 572-130-006 $13.66 572-130-007 $13.66 572-130-008 $13.66 572-130-009 $13.66 572-130-010 $13.66 572-130-011 $13.66 572-130-012 $13.66 572-130-013 $13.66 572-130-014 $13.66 572-130-015 $13.66 572-130-016 $13.66 572-130-017 $13.66 572-130-018 $13.66 572-130-019 $13.66 572-130-020 $13.66 572-130-021 $13.66 572-130-022 $13.66 572-130-023 $13.66 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 572-130-024 $13.66 572-130-025 $13.66 572-130-026 $13.66 572-130-027 $13.66 572-130-028 $13.66 572-130-029 $13.66 572-130-030 $13.66 572-140-001 $13.66 572-140-002 $13.66 572-140-004 $13.66 572-140-005 $13.66 572-140-006 $13.66 572-140-007 $13.66 572-140-008 $13.66 572-140-009 $13.66 572-140-010 $13.66 572-140-011 $13.66 572-140-012 $13.66 572-140-013 $13.66 572-140-014 $13.66 572-140-015 $13.66 572-140-016 $13.66 572-140-017 $13.66 572-140-018 $13.66 572-140-019 $13.66 572-140-022 $13.66 572-140-025 $13.66 572-140-027 $13.66 572-140-028 $13.66 572-150-001 $13.66 572-150-002 $13.66 572-150-003 $13.66 572-150-004 $13.66 572-150-005 $13.66 572-150-006 $13.66 572-150-007 $13.66 572-150-008 $13.66 572-150-009 $13.66 572-150-010 $13.66 572-150-011 $13.66 572-150-012 $13.66 572-150-013 $13.66 572-150-015 $13.66 572-150-016 $13.66 572-150-017 $13.66 572-150-018 $13.66 572-150-019 $13.66 572-150-020 $13.66 572-150-021 $13.66 572-150-022 $13.66 572-150-023 $13.66 572-150-024 $13.66 572-150-025 $13.66 572-150-026 $13.66 572-150-027 $13.66 572-150-028 $13.66 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 572-150-029 $13.66 572-150-030 $13.66 572-150-031 $13.66 572-160-001 $13.66 572-160-002 $13.66 572-160-003 $13.66 572-160-004 $13.66 572-160-005 $13.66 572-160-006 $13.66 572-160-010 $13.66 572-160-011 $13.66 572-160-012 $13.66 572-160-013 $13.66 572-160-014 $13.66 572-160-015 $13.66 572-160-016 $13.66 572-160-018 $13.66 572-160-023 $13.66 572-160-024 $13.66 572-160-025 $13.66 572-160-026 $13.66 572-160-027 $13.66 572-160-028 $13.66 572-160-029 $13.66 572-160-030 $13.66 572-160-032 $13.66 572-170-001 $13.66 572-170-002 $13.66 572-170-003 $13.66 572-170-004 $13.66 572-170-005 $13.66 572-170-006 $13.66 572-170-007 $13.66 572-170-008 $13.66 572-170-009 $13.66 572-170-011 $13.66 572-170-012 $13.66 572-170-013 $13.66 572-170-014 $13.66 572-170-015 $13.66 572-170-016 $13.66 572-170-017 $13.66 572-170-018 $13.66 572-170-019 $13.66 572-170-020 $13.66 572-170-021 $13.66 572-170-022 $13.66 572-170-023 $13.66 572-170-024 $13.66 572-170-025 $13.66 572-170-026 $13.66 572-170-028 $13.66 572-170-029 $13.66 572-170-030 $13.66 572-170-031 $13.66 572-170-032 $13.66 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 572-170-033 $13.66 572-170-034 $13.66 572-170-035 $13.66 572-170-037 $13.66 572-170-038 $13.66 572-170-039 $13.66 572-170-040 $13.66 572-170-041 $13.66 572-170-042 $13.66 572-170-043 $13.66 572-181-002 $13.66 572-181-003 $13.66 572-181-004 $13.66 572-181-005 $13.66 572-181-006 $13.66 572-181-007 $13.66 572-181-008 $13.66 572-181-009 $13.66 572-181-010 $13.66 572-181-011 $13.66 572-181-013 $13.66 572-181-014 $13.66 572-181-015 $13.66 572-181-016 $6.82 572-181-017 $13.66 572-181-019 $13.66 572-181-020 $13.66 572-181-022 $13.66 572-181-023 $13.66 572-181-024 $13.66 572-181-025 $13.66 572-181-026 $13.66 572-181-027 $13.66 572-181-029 $13.66 572-181-030 $13.66 572-181-031 $13.66 572-181-032 $13.66 572-181-033 $13.66 572-181-034 $13.66 572-181-035 $13.66 572-181-036 $6.82 572-181-037 $13.66 572-181-038 $13.66 572-181-039 $6.82 572-181-040 $13.66 572-182-001 $13.66 572-182-002 $13.66 572-182-003 $13.66 572-182-004 $13.66 572-182-007 $13.66 572-182-008 $13.66 572-182-009 $13.66 572-182-010 $13.66 572-182-013 $13.66 572-182-014 $13.66 572-182-015 $13.66 28 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 613 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 21 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2846 LW LEVY CODE: Kensington Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 572-182-016 $13.66 572-182-017 $13.66 572-190-001 $13.66 572-190-002 $13.66 572-190-003 $13.66 572-190-004 $13.66 572-190-005 $13.66 572-190-006 $13.66 572-190-007 $13.66 572-190-008 $13.66 572-190-009 $13.66 572-190-010 $13.66 572-190-011 $13.66 572-190-012 $13.66 572-190-013 $13.66 572-201-002 $13.66 572-201-003 $13.66 572-201-004 $13.66 572-201-005 $13.66 572-201-006 $13.66 572-201-007 $13.66 572-201-008 $13.66 572-201-009 $13.66 572-201-010 $13.66 572-201-011 $13.66 572-201-012 $13.66 572-201-013 $13.66 572-201-014 $13.66 572-201-015 $13.66 572-201-016 $13.66 572-201-019 $13.66 572-201-020 $13.66 572-201-021 $6.82 572-202-004 $13.66 572-202-005 $13.66 572-202-006 $13.66 572-202-007 $13.66 572-202-008 $13.66 572-202-009 $13.66 572-202-010 $13.66 572-202-012 $13.66 572-202-013 $13.66 572-202-014 $13.66 572-202-015 $13.66 572-202-016 $13.66 572-202-020 $13.66 572-202-023 $13.66 572-202-024 $13.66 572-202-025 $13.66 572-202-026 $13.66 572-202-027 $13.66 572-202-029 $13.66 572-202-032 $13.66 572-203-001 $13.66 572-203-002 $13.66 572-203-003 $13.66 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 572-203-004 $13.66 572-203-007 $13.66 572-203-008 $13.66 572-203-009 $13.66 572-203-010 $13.66 572-203-011 $13.66 572-203-012 $6.82 572-203-013 $13.66 572-203-014 $13.66 572-203-015 $13.66 572-203-016 $13.66 572-203-017 $13.66 572-203-018 $13.66 572-203-019 $13.66 572-203-020 $13.66 572-203-021 $13.66 572-203-022 $13.66 572-203-023 $13.66 572-203-024 $13.66 572-203-025 $13.66 572-203-028 $6.82 572-203-029 $13.66 572-204-001 $13.66 572-204-002 $13.66 572-204-003 $13.66 572-204-004 $13.66 572-204-005 $13.66 572-204-006 $13.66 572-204-007 $13.66 572-204-008 $13.66 572-204-009 $13.66 572-204-010 $13.66 572-204-011 $13.66 572-204-012 $13.66 572-204-013 $13.66 572-204-014 $13.66 572-204-015 $13.66 572-204-016 $13.66 572-204-017 $13.66 572-204-018 $13.66 572-204-019 $13.66 572-204-020 $13.66 572-210-002 $13.66 572-221-001 $13.66 572-221-003 $13.66 572-221-004 $13.66 572-221-005 $13.66 572-221-006 $13.66 572-222-003 $13.66 572-222-004 $13.66 572-222-005 $13.66 572-222-006 $13.66 572-222-007 $13.66 572-222-008 $13.66 572-222-009 $13.66 572-222-010 $13.66 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 572-222-011 $13.66 572-222-012 $13.66 572-222-013 $13.66 572-222-014 $13.66 572-222-015 $13.66 572-222-016 $13.66 572-222-017 $13.66 572-222-018 $13.66 572-222-019 $13.66 572-222-020 $13.66 572-222-021 $13.66 572-222-022 $13.66 572-222-023 $40.98 572-222-025 $6.82 572-222-026 $13.66 572-231-001 $13.66 572-231-002 $13.66 572-231-003 $13.66 572-231-004 $13.66 572-231-005 $13.66 572-231-006 $13.66 572-231-007 $13.66 572-231-008 $13.66 572-231-009 $13.66 572-231-010 $6.82 572-231-011 $13.66 572-231-012 $13.66 572-231-013 $13.66 572-231-014 $13.66 572-231-015 $13.66 572-231-016 $13.66 572-231-017 $13.66 572-231-018 $13.66 572-231-019 $13.66 572-231-020 $13.66 572-231-021 $13.66 572-231-022 $13.66 572-231-023 $13.66 572-231-024 $13.66 572-231-025 $13.66 572-231-026 $13.66 572-231-027 $13.66 572-231-028 $13.66 572-231-029 $13.66 572-232-001 $13.66 572-232-002 $13.66 572-232-003 $13.66 572-232-004 $13.66 572-232-005 $13.66 572-232-006 $13.66 572-232-007 $13.66 572-232-008 $13.66 572-232-009 $13.66 572-232-010 $13.66 572-232-011 $13.66 572-232-012 $13.66 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 572-232-013 $13.66 572-232-014 $13.66 572-232-015 $13.66 572-232-016 $13.66 572-232-017 $13.66 572-232-018 $13.66 572-232-019 $13.66 572-232-020 $13.66 572-232-021 $13.66 572-232-022 $13.66 572-232-023 $13.66 572-232-024 $13.66 572-232-025 $13.66 572-232-026 $13.66 572-233-001 $13.66 572-233-002 $13.66 572-233-003 $13.66 572-233-004 $13.66 572-233-005 $13.66 572-233-006 $13.66 572-233-007 $13.66 572-233-008 $13.66 572-233-009 $13.66 572-233-010 $13.66 572-233-011 $13.66 572-233-012 $13.66 572-233-013 $13.66 572-233-014 $13.66 572-233-015 $13.66 572-233-016 $13.66 572-234-001 $13.66 572-234-002 $13.66 572-234-003 $13.66 572-234-004 $13.66 572-234-005 $13.66 572-234-006 $13.66 572-234-007 $13.66 573-091-002 $13.66 573-091-003 $13.66 573-091-004 $13.66 573-091-007 $13.66 573-091-008 $13.66 573-091-009 $13.66 573-092-001 $13.66 573-092-002 $13.66 573-092-003 $13.66 573-092-004 $13.66 573-093-001 $13.66 573-093-002 $13.66 573-093-003 $13.66 573-093-004 $13.66 573-093-005 $13.66 573-093-006 $13.66 573-093-007 $13.66 573-093-008 $13.66 573-093-009 $13.66 29 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 614 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 21 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2846 LW LEVY CODE: Kensington Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 573-093-011 $13.66 573-093-012 $13.66 573-093-013 $13.66 573-093-014 $13.66 573-093-015 $13.66 573-093-016 $13.66 573-093-017 $13.66 573-093-018 $6.82 572-050-025 $13.66 572-050-026 $13.66 571-040-011 $13.66 571-040-012 $13.66 572-170-044 $13.66 572-170-045 $13.66 572-221-007 $13.66 572-221-008 $6.82 2256Total Parcels: $30,655.40 Total Assessment: 30 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 615 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 22 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2857 LF LEVY CODE: Seabreeze - Bay Point Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 098-541-001 $290.00 098-541-002 $290.00 098-541-003 $290.00 098-541-004 $290.00 098-541-005 $290.00 098-541-006 $290.00 098-541-007 $290.00 098-541-008 $290.00 098-541-009 $290.00 098-541-010 $290.00 098-541-011 $290.00 098-541-012 $290.00 098-541-013 $290.00 098-541-014 $290.00 098-541-015 $290.00 098-541-016 $290.00 098-541-017 $290.00 098-541-018 $290.00 098-541-019 $290.00 098-541-020 $290.00 098-541-021 $290.00 098-541-022 $290.00 098-541-023 $290.00 098-541-024 $290.00 098-541-025 $290.00 098-541-026 $290.00 098-541-027 $290.00 098-541-028 $290.00 098-541-029 $290.00 098-541-030 $290.00 098-541-031 $290.00 098-541-032 $290.00 098-541-033 $290.00 098-541-034 $290.00 098-541-035 $290.00 098-541-036 $290.00 098-541-037 $290.00 098-541-038 $290.00 098-541-039 $290.00 098-542-001 $290.00 098-542-002 $290.00 098-542-003 $290.00 098-542-004 $290.00 098-542-005 $290.00 098-542-006 $290.00 098-542-007 $290.00 098-542-008 $290.00 098-542-009 $290.00 098-542-010 $290.00 098-542-011 $290.00 098-542-012 $290.00 098-542-013 $290.00 098-542-014 $290.00 098-542-015 $290.00 098-542-016 $290.00 098-542-017 $290.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 098-542-018 $290.00 098-542-019 $290.00 098-542-020 $290.00 098-542-021 $290.00 098-542-022 $290.00 098-542-023 $290.00 098-542-024 $290.00 098-542-025 $290.00 098-542-026 $290.00 098-542-029 $290.00 098-542-030 $290.00 098-542-031 $290.00 098-542-032 $290.00 098-542-033 $290.00 098-551-001 $290.00 098-551-002 $290.00 098-551-003 $290.00 098-551-004 $290.00 098-551-005 $290.00 098-551-006 $290.00 098-551-007 $290.00 098-551-008 $290.00 098-551-009 $290.00 098-551-010 $290.00 098-551-011 $290.00 098-551-012 $290.00 098-551-013 $290.00 098-551-014 $290.00 098-551-015 $290.00 098-551-016 $290.00 098-551-017 $290.00 098-552-001 $290.00 098-552-002 $290.00 098-552-003 $290.00 098-552-004 $290.00 098-552-005 $290.00 098-552-006 $290.00 098-552-007 $290.00 098-552-008 $290.00 098-552-009 $290.00 098-552-010 $290.00 098-552-011 $290.00 098-552-012 $290.00 098-552-013 $290.00 098-552-014 $290.00 098-552-015 $290.00 098-552-016 $290.00 098-552-017 $290.00 098-552-018 $290.00 098-552-019 $290.00 098-552-020 $290.00 098-552-021 $290.00 098-552-022 $290.00 098-552-023 $290.00 098-552-024 $290.00 098-552-025 $290.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 098-552-026 $290.00 098-552-027 $290.00 098-552-028 $290.00 098-552-029 $290.00 098-552-030 $290.00 098-552-031 $290.00 098-552-032 $290.00 098-552-033 $290.00 098-552-034 $290.00 098-552-035 $290.00 098-552-036 $290.00 098-552-037 $290.00 098-552-038 $290.00 098-552-039 $290.00 098-552-040 $290.00 098-552-041 $290.00 098-552-042 $290.00 098-552-043 $290.00 098-552-044 $290.00 098-552-045 $290.00 098-552-046 $290.00 098-552-047 $290.00 098-552-048 $290.00 098-552-049 $290.00 098-552-050 $290.00 098-580-001 $290.00 098-580-002 $290.00 098-580-003 $290.00 098-580-004 $290.00 098-580-005 $290.00 098-580-006 $290.00 098-580-007 $290.00 098-580-008 $290.00 098-580-009 $290.00 098-580-010 $290.00 098-580-011 $290.00 098-580-012 $290.00 098-580-013 $290.00 098-580-014 $290.00 098-580-015 $290.00 098-580-016 $290.00 098-580-017 $290.00 154Total Parcels: $44,660.00 Total Assessment: 31 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 616 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 27 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2855 LM LEVY CODE: Bettencourt Ranch - Camino Tassajara Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 203-061-001 $105.68 203-061-002 $105.68 203-061-003 $105.68 203-061-004 $105.68 203-061-005 $105.68 203-061-006 $105.68 203-061-007 $105.68 203-061-008 $105.68 203-061-009 $105.68 203-061-010 $105.68 203-061-011 $105.68 203-061-012 $105.68 203-061-013 $105.68 203-061-014 $105.68 203-061-015 $105.68 203-061-016 $105.68 203-061-017 $105.68 203-061-018 $105.68 203-061-019 $105.68 203-061-020 $105.68 203-061-021 $105.68 203-061-022 $105.68 203-061-023 $105.68 203-061-024 $105.68 203-061-025 $105.68 203-061-026 $105.68 203-061-027 $105.68 203-061-028 $105.68 203-061-029 $105.68 203-061-030 $105.68 203-061-031 $105.68 203-061-032 $105.68 203-061-033 $105.68 203-061-034 $105.68 203-061-035 $105.68 203-061-036 $105.68 203-061-037 $105.68 203-061-038 $105.68 203-061-039 $105.68 203-061-040 $105.68 203-061-041 $105.68 203-061-042 $105.68 203-061-043 $105.68 203-061-044 $105.68 203-061-045 $105.68 203-061-046 $105.68 203-061-047 $105.68 203-061-048 $105.68 203-061-049 $105.68 203-061-050 $105.68 203-061-051 $105.68 203-061-052 $105.68 203-061-053 $105.68 203-061-054 $105.68 203-061-055 $105.68 203-061-056 $105.68 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 203-061-057 $105.68 203-061-058 $105.68 203-061-059 $105.68 203-061-060 $105.68 203-061-061 $105.68 203-061-062 $105.68 203-061-063 $105.68 203-061-064 $105.68 203-061-065 $105.68 203-071-001 $105.68 203-071-002 $105.68 203-071-003 $105.68 203-071-004 $105.68 203-071-005 $105.68 203-071-006 $105.68 203-071-007 $105.68 203-071-008 $105.68 203-071-009 $105.68 203-071-010 $105.68 203-071-011 $105.68 203-071-012 $105.68 203-071-013 $105.68 203-071-014 $105.68 203-071-015 $105.68 203-071-016 $105.68 203-071-017 $105.68 203-071-018 $105.68 203-071-019 $105.68 203-071-020 $105.68 203-071-021 $105.68 203-071-022 $105.68 203-071-023 $105.68 203-071-024 $105.68 203-071-025 $105.68 203-071-026 $105.68 203-071-027 $105.68 203-071-028 $105.68 203-071-029 $105.68 203-071-030 $105.68 203-071-031 $105.68 203-071-032 $105.68 203-071-033 $105.68 203-071-034 $105.68 203-071-035 $105.68 203-071-036 $105.68 203-071-037 $105.68 203-071-038 $105.68 203-071-039 $105.68 203-071-040 $105.68 203-071-041 $105.68 203-071-042 $105.68 203-071-043 $105.68 203-071-044 $105.68 203-071-045 $105.68 203-071-046 $105.68 203-071-047 $105.68 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 203-071-048 $105.68 203-071-049 $105.68 203-071-050 $105.68 203-071-051 $105.68 203-071-052 $105.68 203-071-053 $105.68 203-071-054 $105.68 203-071-055 $105.68 203-071-056 $105.68 203-071-057 $105.68 203-071-058 $105.68 203-071-059 $105.68 203-071-060 $105.68 203-071-061 $105.68 203-071-062 $105.68 203-071-063 $105.68 203-071-064 $105.68 203-071-065 $105.68 203-071-066 $105.68 203-071-067 $105.68 203-071-068 $105.68 203-071-069 $105.68 203-071-070 $105.68 203-071-071 $105.68 203-071-072 $105.68 203-071-073 $105.68 203-071-074 $105.68 203-071-075 $105.68 203-071-076 $105.68 203-071-077 $105.68 203-071-078 $105.68 203-071-079 $105.68 203-071-080 $105.68 203-071-081 $105.68 203-071-082 $105.68 203-071-083 $105.68 203-071-084 $105.68 203-071-085 $105.68 220-440-010 $150.00 220-440-011 $150.00 220-440-012 $150.00 220-440-013 $150.00 220-440-014 $150.00 220-440-015 $150.00 220-440-016 $150.00 220-440-017 $150.00 220-440-018 $150.00 220-440-019 $150.00 220-440-020 $150.00 220-440-023 $150.00 220-440-024 $150.00 220-440-025 $150.00 220-440-026 $150.00 220-440-027 $150.00 220-440-030 $150.00 220-440-031 $150.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 220-440-032 $150.00 220-440-033 $150.00 220-440-034 $150.00 220-440-035 $150.00 220-440-036 $150.00 220-440-038 $150.00 220-440-039 $150.00 220-440-040 $150.00 220-440-041 $150.00 220-450-010 $150.00 220-450-011 $150.00 220-450-012 $150.00 220-450-013 $150.00 220-450-014 $150.00 220-450-015 $150.00 220-450-016 $150.00 220-450-017 $150.00 220-450-018 $150.00 220-450-019 $150.00 220-450-020 $150.00 220-450-021 $150.00 220-450-022 $150.00 220-450-023 $150.00 220-450-024 $150.00 220-450-025 $150.00 220-450-026 $150.00 220-450-027 $150.00 220-450-028 $150.00 220-450-029 $150.00 220-450-030 $150.00 220-450-031 $150.00 220-450-032 $150.00 220-450-033 $150.00 220-450-034 $150.00 220-450-035 $150.00 220-450-036 $150.00 220-450-037 $150.00 220-450-038 $150.00 220-450-039 $150.00 220-450-040 $150.00 220-450-041 $150.00 220-450-042 $150.00 220-450-043 $150.00 220-450-044 $150.00 220-450-045 $150.00 220-450-046 $150.00 220-450-047 $150.00 220-450-048 $150.00 220-450-049 $150.00 220-450-050 $150.00 220-450-051 $150.00 220-460-028 $150.00 220-460-029 $150.00 220-460-030 $150.00 220-460-031 $150.00 220-460-032 $150.00 32 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 617 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 27 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2855 LM LEVY CODE: Bettencourt Ranch - Camino Tassajara Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 220-460-033 $150.00 220-460-034 $150.00 220-460-035 $150.00 220-460-036 $150.00 220-460-037 $150.00 220-460-038 $150.00 220-460-039 $150.00 220-460-040 $150.00 220-460-041 $150.00 220-460-042 $150.00 220-460-043 $150.00 220-460-044 $150.00 220-460-045 $150.00 220-460-046 $150.00 220-460-047 $150.00 220-460-048 $150.00 220-460-049 $150.00 220-460-050 $150.00 220-460-051 $150.00 220-460-052 $150.00 220-460-053 $150.00 220-460-054 $150.00 220-460-055 $150.00 220-460-056 $150.00 220-460-057 $150.00 220-460-058 $150.00 220-460-059 $150.00 220-460-060 $150.00 220-460-061 $150.00 220-460-062 $150.00 220-460-063 $150.00 220-460-064 $150.00 220-460-065 $150.00 220-460-066 $150.00 220-750-001 $150.00 220-750-002 $150.00 220-750-003 $150.00 220-750-004 $150.00 220-750-005 $150.00 220-750-006 $150.00 220-750-007 $150.00 220-750-008 $150.00 220-750-009 $150.00 220-750-010 $150.00 220-750-011 $150.00 220-750-012 $150.00 220-750-013 $150.00 220-750-014 $150.00 220-750-015 $150.00 220-750-016 $150.00 220-750-017 $150.00 220-750-018 $150.00 220-750-019 $150.00 220-750-020 $150.00 220-750-021 $150.00 220-750-022 $150.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 220-750-023 $150.00 220-750-024 $150.00 220-750-025 $150.00 220-750-026 $150.00 220-750-027 $150.00 220-750-028 $150.00 220-750-029 $150.00 220-750-030 $150.00 220-750-031 $150.00 220-750-032 $150.00 220-750-033 $150.00 220-750-034 $150.00 220-750-035 $150.00 220-750-036 $150.00 220-750-037 $150.00 220-750-038 $150.00 220-750-039 $150.00 220-750-040 $150.00 220-750-041 $150.00 220-750-042 $150.00 220-750-043 $150.00 220-750-044 $150.00 220-750-045 $150.00 220-750-046 $150.00 220-750-047 $150.00 220-750-048 $150.00 220-750-049 $150.00 220-750-050 $150.00 220-750-051 $150.00 220-750-052 $150.00 220-760-001 $150.00 220-760-002 $150.00 220-760-003 $150.00 220-760-004 $150.00 220-760-005 $150.00 220-760-006 $150.00 220-760-007 $150.00 220-760-008 $150.00 220-760-009 $150.00 220-760-010 $150.00 220-760-011 $150.00 220-760-012 $150.00 220-760-013 $150.00 220-760-014 $150.00 220-760-015 $150.00 220-760-016 $150.00 220-760-017 $150.00 220-760-018 $150.00 220-760-019 $150.00 220-760-020 $150.00 220-760-021 $150.00 220-760-022 $150.00 220-760-023 $150.00 220-760-024 $150.00 220-760-025 $150.00 220-760-026 $150.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 220-760-027 $150.00 220-760-028 $150.00 220-760-029 $150.00 220-760-030 $150.00 220-760-031 $150.00 220-760-032 $150.00 220-770-001 $150.00 220-770-002 $150.00 220-770-003 $150.00 220-770-004 $150.00 220-770-005 $150.00 220-770-006 $150.00 220-770-007 $150.00 220-770-008 $150.00 220-770-009 $150.00 220-770-010 $150.00 220-770-011 $150.00 220-770-012 $150.00 220-770-013 $150.00 220-770-014 $150.00 220-770-015 $150.00 220-770-016 $150.00 220-770-017 $150.00 220-770-018 $150.00 220-770-019 $150.00 220-770-020 $150.00 220-770-021 $150.00 220-770-022 $150.00 220-770-023 $150.00 220-780-001 $150.00 220-780-002 $150.00 220-780-003 $150.00 220-780-004 $150.00 220-780-005 $150.00 220-780-006 $150.00 220-780-007 $150.00 220-780-008 $150.00 220-780-009 $150.00 220-780-010 $150.00 220-780-011 $150.00 220-780-012 $150.00 220-780-013 $150.00 220-780-014 $150.00 220-780-015 $150.00 220-780-016 $150.00 220-780-017 $150.00 220-780-018 $150.00 220-780-019 $150.00 220-780-020 $150.00 220-780-021 $150.00 220-790-001 $150.00 220-790-002 $150.00 220-790-003 $150.00 220-790-004 $150.00 220-790-005 $150.00 220-790-006 $150.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 220-790-007 $150.00 220-790-008 $150.00 220-790-009 $150.00 220-790-010 $150.00 220-790-011 $150.00 220-790-012 $150.00 220-790-013 $150.00 220-790-014 $150.00 220-790-015 $150.00 220-790-016 $150.00 220-790-017 $150.00 220-790-018 $150.00 220-790-019 $150.00 220-790-020 $150.00 220-790-021 $150.00 220-790-022 $150.00 220-790-023 $150.00 220-790-024 $150.00 220-790-025 $150.00 220-790-026 $150.00 220-790-027 $150.00 220-790-028 $150.00 220-790-029 $150.00 220-790-030 $150.00 220-790-031 $150.00 220-790-032 $150.00 220-790-033 $150.00 220-790-034 $150.00 220-790-035 $150.00 220-790-036 $150.00 220-790-037 $150.00 220-790-038 $150.00 220-790-039 $150.00 220-790-040 $150.00 220-790-041 $150.00 220-790-042 $150.00 220-790-043 $150.00 220-790-044 $150.00 220-790-045 $150.00 220-790-046 $150.00 220-790-047 $150.00 220-790-048 $150.00 220-790-049 $150.00 220-790-050 $150.00 220-790-051 $150.00 220-790-052 $150.00 220-790-053 $150.00 220-790-054 $150.00 220-790-055 $150.00 220-790-056 $150.00 220-790-057 $150.00 220-790-058 $150.00 220-790-059 $150.00 220-790-060 $150.00 220-790-061 $150.00 220-790-062 $150.00 33 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 618 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 27 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2855 LM LEVY CODE: Bettencourt Ranch - Camino Tassajara Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 220-800-001 $150.00 220-800-002 $150.00 220-800-003 $150.00 220-800-004 $150.00 220-800-005 $150.00 220-800-006 $150.00 220-800-007 $150.00 220-800-008 $150.00 220-800-009 $150.00 220-800-010 $150.00 220-800-011 $150.00 220-800-012 $150.00 220-800-013 $150.00 220-800-014 $150.00 220-800-015 $150.00 220-800-016 $150.00 220-800-017 $150.00 220-800-018 $150.00 220-800-019 $150.00 220-800-020 $150.00 220-800-021 $150.00 220-800-022 $150.00 220-800-023 $150.00 220-800-024 $150.00 220-800-025 $150.00 220-800-026 $150.00 220-800-027 $150.00 220-800-028 $150.00 220-800-029 $150.00 220-800-030 $150.00 220-800-031 $150.00 220-800-032 $150.00 220-800-033 $150.00 220-800-034 $150.00 220-800-035 $150.00 220-800-036 $150.00 220-800-037 $150.00 220-810-001 $150.00 220-810-002 $150.00 220-810-003 $150.00 220-810-004 $150.00 220-810-005 $150.00 220-810-006 $150.00 220-810-007 $150.00 220-810-008 $150.00 220-810-009 $150.00 220-810-010 $150.00 220-810-011 $150.00 220-810-012 $150.00 220-810-013 $150.00 220-810-014 $150.00 220-810-015 $150.00 220-810-016 $150.00 220-810-017 $150.00 220-810-018 $150.00 220-810-019 $150.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 220-810-020 $150.00 220-810-021 $150.00 220-810-022 $150.00 220-810-023 $150.00 220-820-001 $150.00 220-820-002 $150.00 220-820-003 $150.00 220-820-004 $150.00 220-820-005 $150.00 220-820-006 $150.00 220-820-007 $150.00 220-820-008 $150.00 220-820-009 $150.00 220-820-010 $150.00 220-820-011 $150.00 220-820-012 $150.00 220-820-013 $150.00 220-820-014 $150.00 220-820-015 $150.00 220-820-016 $150.00 220-820-017 $150.00 220-820-018 $150.00 220-820-019 $150.00 220-820-020 $150.00 220-820-021 $150.00 220-820-022 $150.00 220-820-023 $150.00 220-820-024 $150.00 220-820-025 $150.00 220-820-026 $150.00 220-820-027 $150.00 220-820-028 $150.00 220-820-029 $150.00 220-820-030 $150.00 220-820-031 $150.00 220-820-032 $150.00 220-820-033 $150.00 220-820-034 $150.00 220-820-035 $150.00 220-820-036 $150.00 220-820-037 $150.00 220-820-038 $150.00 220-820-039 $150.00 220-820-042 $150.00 220-820-043 $150.00 220-820-044 $150.00 220-820-045 $150.00 220-820-046 $150.00 220-820-047 $150.00 220-820-048 $150.00 220-820-049 $150.00 220-820-050 $150.00 220-820-051 $150.00 220-820-052 $150.00 220-820-053 $150.00 220-820-054 $150.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 220-820-055 $150.00 220-820-056 $150.00 220-820-057 $150.00 220-820-058 $150.00 220-820-059 $150.00 220-820-060 $150.00 220-820-061 $150.00 220-820-062 $150.00 220-820-063 $150.00 220-820-069 $150.00 220-820-070 $150.00 571Total Parcels: $79,002.00 Total Assessment: 34 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 619 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 35 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2881 ND LEVY CODE: Sandy Cove- Discovery Bay Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-470-002 $3,627.48 011-470-003 $946.30 011-470-004 $1,577.16 011-470-005 $512.58 011-470-006 $1,577.16 011-470-007 $1,143.44 011-470-009 $5,382.08 011-470-010 $552.00 011-220-039 $12,124.48 9Total Parcels: $27,442.68 Total Assessment: 35 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 620 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 36 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2852 MR LEVY CODE: Alamo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 187-070-005 $9.36 187-070-006 $9.36 187-070-007 $9.36 187-070-009 $9.36 187-070-015 $9.36 187-080-001 $9.36 187-080-002 $9.36 187-080-003 $9.36 187-080-005 $9.36 187-080-006 $9.36 187-080-007 $9.36 187-080-012 $9.36 187-080-013 $9.36 187-090-015 $9.36 187-090-016 $9.36 187-090-017 $9.36 187-090-018 $9.36 187-090-019 $9.36 187-090-020 $9.36 187-090-021 $9.36 187-090-022 $9.36 187-090-023 $9.36 187-090-024 $9.36 187-090-025 $9.36 187-090-026 $9.36 187-090-028 $9.36 187-100-003 $9.36 187-100-013 $9.36 187-100-014 $9.36 187-100-015 $9.36 187-100-016 $9.36 187-100-018 $9.36 187-100-019 $9.36 187-100-020 $9.36 187-100-021 $9.36 187-100-022 $9.36 187-100-023 $9.36 187-100-024 $9.36 187-100-025 $9.36 187-100-026 $9.36 187-100-027 $9.36 187-100-028 $9.36 187-100-029 $9.36 187-100-030 $9.36 187-110-003 $9.36 187-110-004 $9.36 187-110-005 $9.36 187-110-007 $9.36 187-110-008 $9.36 187-110-009 $9.36 187-110-010 $9.36 187-110-011 $9.36 187-110-012 $9.36 187-110-013 $9.36 187-110-014 $9.36 187-110-015 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 187-110-016 $9.36 187-110-021 $9.36 187-110-022 $9.36 187-110-023 $9.36 187-110-024 $9.36 187-110-025 $9.36 187-110-026 $9.36 187-110-027 $9.36 187-110-031 $9.36 187-110-032 $9.36 187-110-034 $9.36 187-110-037 $9.36 187-110-038 $9.36 187-110-039 $9.36 187-110-040 $9.36 187-110-041 $9.36 187-110-042 $9.36 187-110-043 $9.36 187-110-044 $9.36 187-110-045 $9.36 187-110-050 $9.36 187-120-001 $9.36 187-120-002 $9.36 187-120-003 $9.36 187-120-004 $9.36 187-120-009 $9.36 187-120-010 $9.36 187-120-011 $9.36 187-120-014 $9.36 187-120-015 $9.36 187-120-016 $9.36 187-120-018 $9.36 187-120-019 $9.36 187-120-020 $9.36 187-120-021 $9.36 187-120-022 $9.36 187-120-025 $9.36 187-120-031 $9.36 187-120-034 $9.36 187-120-035 $9.36 187-120-036 $9.36 187-120-041 $9.36 187-120-042 $9.36 187-120-043 $9.36 187-120-044 $9.36 187-120-045 $9.36 187-130-002 $9.36 187-130-003 $9.36 187-130-004 $9.36 187-130-006 $9.36 187-130-007 $9.36 187-130-009 $9.36 187-130-013 $9.36 187-130-014 $9.36 187-130-016 $9.36 187-130-018 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 187-130-019 $9.36 187-130-020 $9.36 187-130-021 $9.36 187-171-027 $9.36 187-171-028 $9.36 187-171-029 $9.36 187-171-030 $9.36 187-171-031 $9.36 187-171-032 $9.36 187-171-033 $9.36 187-171-035 $9.36 187-171-036 $9.36 187-171-037 $9.36 187-171-038 $9.36 187-171-039 $9.36 187-171-042 $9.36 187-171-043 $9.36 187-171-044 $9.36 187-171-045 $9.36 187-171-046 $9.36 187-171-047 $9.36 187-171-051 $9.36 187-171-052 $9.36 187-171-053 $9.36 187-171-054 $4.68 187-171-055 $9.36 187-171-056 $9.36 187-171-058 $4.68 187-171-059 $4.68 187-171-060 $4.68 187-171-061 $4.68 187-171-062 $4.68 187-171-063 $4.68 187-171-064 $4.68 187-171-065 $4.68 187-171-066 $9.36 187-180-003 $9.36 187-180-004 $9.36 187-180-006 $9.36 187-180-008 $9.36 187-180-016 $9.36 187-180-018 $4.68 187-180-019 $9.36 187-180-022 $9.36 187-180-023 $9.36 187-180-024 $9.36 187-180-025 $9.36 187-180-026 $9.36 187-180-027 $9.36 187-180-028 $9.36 187-180-029 $9.36 187-180-030 $9.36 187-231-010 $9.36 187-231-012 $9.36 187-231-014 $9.36 187-231-016 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 187-231-021 $9.36 187-231-023 $9.36 187-231-027 $9.36 187-231-028 $9.36 187-231-029 $9.36 187-231-030 $9.36 187-231-032 $9.36 187-231-033 $9.36 187-232-006 $9.36 187-232-010 $9.36 187-232-011 $9.36 187-232-012 $9.36 187-232-013 $9.36 187-232-014 $9.36 187-232-015 $9.36 187-232-018 $9.36 187-232-020 $9.36 187-232-021 $9.36 187-232-022 $9.36 187-232-023 $9.36 187-232-026 $9.36 187-232-027 $9.36 187-232-028 $9.36 187-232-029 $9.36 187-232-030 $9.36 187-232-031 $9.36 187-232-032 $9.36 187-232-033 $9.36 187-232-034 $9.36 187-240-010 $9.36 187-240-014 $9.36 187-240-015 $9.36 187-240-020 $9.36 187-240-022 $9.36 187-240-025 $9.36 187-240-026 $9.36 187-240-027 $9.36 187-240-028 $9.36 187-240-029 $9.36 187-240-032 $9.36 187-240-033 $9.36 187-240-058 $9.36 187-240-059 $9.36 187-240-061 $9.36 187-240-063 $9.36 187-240-064 $9.36 187-240-065 $9.36 187-240-066 $9.36 187-330-006 $9.36 187-330-009 $9.36 187-330-010 $9.36 187-330-011 $9.36 187-330-013 $4.68 187-330-015 $9.36 187-330-016 $9.36 187-330-017 $4.68 36 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 621 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 36 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2852 MR LEVY CODE: Alamo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 187-330-018 $9.36 187-330-019 $9.36 187-330-022 $9.36 187-330-023 $9.36 187-330-024 $9.36 187-330-025 $9.36 187-330-026 $9.36 187-330-027 $9.36 187-330-028 $9.36 187-330-030 $9.36 187-330-031 $9.36 187-430-001 $9.36 187-430-002 $9.36 187-430-003 $9.36 187-430-004 $9.36 187-430-005 $9.36 187-430-006 $9.36 187-430-007 $9.36 187-430-008 $9.36 187-430-009 $9.36 187-430-010 $9.36 187-430-011 $9.36 187-430-012 $9.36 187-430-013 $9.36 187-430-014 $9.36 187-430-015 $9.36 187-430-016 $9.36 187-430-017 $9.36 187-430-018 $9.36 187-430-019 $9.36 187-430-020 $9.36 187-430-021 $9.36 187-441-001 $9.36 187-441-002 $9.36 187-442-001 $9.36 187-442-002 $9.36 187-442-005 $9.36 187-442-006 $9.36 187-442-007 $9.36 187-443-001 $9.36 187-443-002 $9.36 187-443-003 $9.36 187-443-004 $9.36 187-450-001 $9.36 187-450-002 $9.36 187-450-003 $9.36 187-450-004 $9.36 187-450-005 $9.36 187-450-006 $9.36 187-450-007 $9.36 187-470-001 $9.36 187-470-002 $9.36 187-470-003 $9.36 187-470-004 $9.36 187-470-005 $9.36 187-470-006 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 187-470-007 $9.36 187-470-008 $9.36 187-470-009 $9.36 187-470-010 $9.36 187-470-011 $9.36 187-470-012 $9.36 187-470-013 $9.36 187-470-014 $9.36 187-490-001 $9.36 187-490-002 $9.36 187-490-003 $9.36 187-490-004 $9.36 187-490-005 $9.36 187-490-006 $9.36 187-490-007 $9.36 187-490-008 $9.36 187-490-009 $9.36 187-490-010 $9.36 187-490-011 $9.36 187-490-012 $9.36 187-490-013 $9.36 187-490-014 $9.36 187-490-015 $9.36 187-490-016 $9.36 187-490-017 $9.36 187-490-018 $9.36 187-490-019 $9.36 187-490-020 $9.36 187-490-021 $9.36 187-490-022 $9.36 187-490-023 $9.36 187-490-024 $9.36 187-490-025 $9.36 187-490-026 $9.36 187-490-027 $9.36 187-490-028 $9.36 187-490-029 $9.36 187-490-030 $9.36 187-490-035 $9.36 187-490-036 $9.36 187-490-037 $9.36 187-490-038 $9.36 187-490-039 $9.36 187-490-040 $9.36 187-490-041 $9.36 187-490-042 $9.36 187-490-043 $9.36 187-490-044 $9.36 187-490-045 $9.36 187-490-046 $9.36 187-490-047 $9.36 187-490-048 $9.36 187-490-049 $9.36 187-490-050 $9.36 187-490-051 $9.36 187-490-052 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 187-490-053 $9.36 187-490-054 $9.36 187-490-055 $9.36 187-490-056 $9.36 187-490-057 $9.36 187-490-058 $9.36 187-490-059 $9.36 187-490-060 $9.36 187-490-061 $9.36 187-490-062 $9.36 187-490-063 $9.36 187-500-001 $9.36 187-500-002 $9.36 187-500-003 $9.36 187-500-004 $9.36 187-500-005 $9.36 187-500-006 $9.36 187-500-007 $9.36 187-500-008 $9.36 187-500-009 $9.36 187-500-010 $9.36 187-500-011 $9.36 187-500-012 $9.36 187-500-013 $9.36 187-500-014 $9.36 187-500-015 $9.36 187-500-016 $9.36 187-500-017 $9.36 187-500-018 $9.36 187-500-019 $9.36 187-500-020 $9.36 187-500-021 $9.36 187-500-022 $9.36 187-500-023 $9.36 187-500-024 $9.36 187-500-025 $9.36 187-500-026 $9.36 187-500-027 $9.36 187-500-028 $9.36 187-510-001 $9.36 187-510-002 $9.36 187-510-003 $9.36 187-510-004 $9.36 187-510-005 $9.36 187-510-006 $9.36 187-510-007 $9.36 187-510-008 $9.36 187-510-009 $9.36 187-510-010 $9.36 187-510-012 $9.36 187-510-013 $9.36 187-510-014 $9.36 187-510-015 $9.36 187-510-017 $9.36 187-510-018 $9.36 187-520-001 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 187-520-002 $9.36 187-520-003 $9.36 187-520-004 $9.36 187-520-005 $9.36 187-520-006 $9.36 187-520-007 $9.36 187-520-008 $9.36 187-520-009 $9.36 187-520-010 $9.36 187-520-011 $9.36 187-520-012 $9.36 187-520-013 $9.36 187-520-014 $9.36 187-520-015 $9.36 187-520-016 $9.36 187-520-017 $9.36 187-520-018 $9.36 187-520-019 $9.36 187-520-020 $9.36 187-520-021 $9.36 187-520-022 $9.36 187-520-024 $9.36 187-520-025 $9.36 187-520-026 $9.36 187-520-027 $9.36 187-520-028 $9.36 187-520-029 $9.36 187-520-030 $9.36 187-520-031 $9.36 187-520-032 $9.36 187-520-033 $9.36 187-520-034 $9.36 187-520-035 $9.36 187-520-036 $9.36 187-520-037 $9.36 187-520-038 $9.36 187-531-001 $9.36 187-531-002 $9.36 187-531-003 $9.36 187-531-004 $9.36 187-531-005 $9.36 187-531-006 $9.36 187-531-007 $9.36 187-532-001 $9.36 187-532-002 $9.36 187-532-003 $9.36 187-532-004 $9.36 187-532-005 $9.36 187-532-006 $9.36 187-532-007 $9.36 187-532-008 $9.36 187-532-009 $9.36 187-532-010 $9.36 187-532-011 $9.36 187-533-001 $9.36 187-533-002 $9.36 37 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 622 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 36 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2852 MR LEVY CODE: Alamo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 187-533-003 $9.36 187-533-004 $9.36 187-534-001 $9.36 187-534-002 $9.36 187-535-001 $9.36 187-536-001 $9.36 187-537-001 $9.36 187-537-002 $9.36 187-537-003 $9.36 187-537-008 $9.36 187-537-010 $9.36 187-537-011 $9.36 187-537-012 $9.36 187-541-001 $9.36 187-541-002 $9.36 187-541-003 $9.36 187-541-004 $9.36 187-542-001 $9.36 187-542-002 $9.36 187-542-003 $9.36 187-542-004 $9.36 187-542-005 $9.36 187-542-006 $9.36 187-542-007 $9.36 187-542-008 $9.36 187-542-009 $9.36 187-542-010 $9.36 187-542-011 $9.36 187-543-001 $9.36 187-543-002 $9.36 187-543-003 $9.36 187-543-004 $9.36 187-544-003 $9.36 187-544-004 $9.36 187-551-001 $9.36 187-551-002 $9.36 187-551-003 $9.36 187-551-006 $9.36 187-551-007 $9.36 187-551-008 $9.36 187-552-001 $9.36 187-552-002 $9.36 188-190-006 $9.36 188-190-009 $9.36 188-190-010 $9.36 188-190-024 $9.36 188-190-030 $9.36 188-190-031 $9.36 188-190-034 $9.36 188-200-001 $9.36 188-200-002 $9.36 188-200-004 $9.36 188-200-005 $9.36 188-200-006 $9.36 188-200-007 $9.36 188-200-008 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 188-200-009 $9.36 188-200-010 $9.36 188-200-011 $9.36 188-200-012 $9.36 188-200-015 $9.36 188-200-017 $9.36 188-200-020 $9.36 188-200-022 $4.68 188-200-029 $9.36 188-200-030 $9.36 188-200-031 $9.36 188-200-032 $9.36 188-200-033 $9.36 188-200-036 $9.36 188-200-037 $9.36 188-200-038 $9.36 188-210-001 $9.36 188-210-003 $9.36 188-210-004 $9.36 188-210-006 $9.36 188-210-008 $9.36 188-210-009 $9.36 188-210-010 $9.36 188-210-019 $9.36 188-210-020 $9.36 188-210-021 $9.36 188-210-022 $9.36 188-210-023 $9.36 188-210-024 $9.36 188-210-025 $9.36 188-210-026 $9.36 188-210-027 $9.36 188-210-029 $9.36 188-210-030 $9.36 188-210-031 $4.68 188-210-032 $9.36 188-210-033 $9.36 188-210-035 $9.36 188-210-036 $9.36 188-210-037 $9.36 188-210-040 $9.36 188-232-002 $9.36 188-232-003 $9.36 188-232-004 $9.36 188-232-005 $9.36 188-232-006 $9.36 188-232-011 $9.36 188-232-012 $9.36 188-232-013 $9.36 188-232-018 $9.36 188-232-019 $9.36 188-232-020 $9.36 188-232-022 $9.36 188-232-023 $9.36 188-232-027 $9.36 188-232-028 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 188-232-029 $9.36 188-232-030 $9.36 188-232-035 $9.36 188-232-036 $9.36 188-232-037 $9.36 188-232-038 $9.36 188-232-041 $9.36 188-241-001 $9.36 188-241-007 $9.36 188-241-008 $9.36 188-241-009 $9.36 188-241-010 $9.36 188-241-011 $9.36 188-241-013 $9.36 188-241-014 $9.36 188-241-015 $9.36 188-241-017 $9.36 188-241-018 $9.36 188-241-019 $9.36 188-241-021 $9.36 188-241-022 $9.36 188-241-023 $9.36 188-241-025 $4.68 188-241-026 $9.36 188-241-027 $9.36 188-241-030 $9.36 188-241-031 $9.36 188-241-032 $9.36 188-241-033 $9.36 188-241-034 $9.36 188-251-001 $9.36 188-251-002 $9.36 188-251-003 $9.36 188-251-005 $9.36 188-251-006 $4.68 188-251-007 $9.36 188-251-008 $9.36 188-251-009 $9.36 188-251-010 $9.36 188-251-011 $9.36 188-251-012 $9.36 188-252-001 $9.36 188-252-009 $9.36 188-252-010 $9.36 188-252-012 $9.36 188-252-013 $9.36 188-252-017 $9.36 188-252-020 $9.36 188-252-021 $9.36 188-252-023 $9.36 188-252-024 $9.36 188-252-025 $9.36 188-252-026 $9.36 188-252-027 $9.36 188-252-028 $9.36 188-261-001 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 188-261-002 $9.36 188-261-003 $9.36 188-261-004 $9.36 188-261-005 $9.36 188-261-006 $9.36 188-261-007 $9.36 188-261-008 $9.36 188-261-009 $9.36 188-261-010 $9.36 188-261-011 $9.36 188-261-012 $9.36 188-262-001 $9.36 188-262-005 $9.36 188-262-006 $9.36 188-262-007 $9.36 188-262-010 $9.36 188-262-011 $9.36 188-262-017 $9.36 188-262-018 $9.36 188-262-019 $9.36 188-262-020 $9.36 188-262-021 $9.36 188-262-022 $9.36 188-270-003 $9.36 188-270-004 $9.36 188-270-005 $9.36 188-270-006 $9.36 188-270-007 $9.36 188-270-009 $9.36 188-270-010 $9.36 188-270-011 $9.36 188-270-012 $9.36 188-270-013 $9.36 188-270-014 $9.36 188-270-019 $9.36 188-270-020 $9.36 188-270-021 $9.36 188-270-022 $9.36 188-270-023 $9.36 188-270-024 $9.36 188-270-025 $9.36 188-270-026 $9.36 188-270-027 $9.36 188-270-028 $9.36 188-270-029 $9.36 188-270-030 $9.36 188-270-031 $9.36 188-270-032 $9.36 188-270-033 $9.36 188-270-035 $9.36 188-270-036 $9.36 188-270-037 $9.36 188-270-038 $9.36 188-270-039 $9.36 188-281-004 $9.36 188-281-006 $9.36 38 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 623 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 36 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2852 MR LEVY CODE: Alamo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 188-281-009 $9.36 188-281-011 $9.36 188-281-017 $9.36 188-281-020 $9.36 188-281-022 $9.36 188-281-023 $9.36 188-281-024 $9.36 188-281-025 $9.36 188-282-003 $9.36 188-282-007 $9.36 188-282-008 $9.36 188-282-011 $9.36 188-282-012 $9.36 188-282-013 $9.36 188-282-014 $9.36 188-282-015 $9.36 188-282-016 $9.36 188-283-001 $9.36 188-283-002 $9.36 188-283-003 $9.36 188-283-004 $9.36 188-283-005 $9.36 188-283-006 $9.36 188-283-007 $9.36 188-283-008 $9.36 188-283-009 $9.36 188-283-011 $9.36 188-283-012 $9.36 188-283-014 $9.36 188-291-007 $9.36 188-291-009 $9.36 188-291-017 $9.36 188-291-019 $9.36 188-291-020 $9.36 188-291-024 $4.68 188-291-025 $9.36 188-291-028 $9.36 188-291-035 $4.68 188-291-036 $9.36 188-292-003 $9.36 188-292-004 $9.36 188-292-008 $9.36 188-292-010 $9.36 188-292-011 $9.36 188-292-013 $9.36 188-292-014 $9.36 188-292-015 $9.36 188-292-016 $9.36 188-292-020 $9.36 188-292-022 $9.36 188-292-023 $9.36 188-292-026 $9.36 188-292-027 $9.36 188-301-001 $9.36 188-301-002 $9.36 188-301-005 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 188-301-006 $9.36 188-301-007 $9.36 188-301-008 $9.36 188-301-009 $9.36 188-302-001 $9.36 188-302-002 $9.36 188-302-003 $9.36 188-302-004 $9.36 188-302-005 $9.36 188-302-006 $9.36 188-302-007 $9.36 188-302-008 $9.36 188-302-009 $9.36 188-302-010 $9.36 188-302-011 $9.36 188-302-012 $9.36 188-302-018 $9.36 188-303-001 $9.36 188-303-005 $9.36 188-303-006 $9.36 188-303-008 $9.36 188-303-010 $9.36 188-303-011 $9.36 188-303-012 $9.36 188-303-013 $9.36 188-303-014 $9.36 188-303-015 $9.36 188-303-016 $9.36 188-303-017 $9.36 188-303-018 $9.36 188-311-002 $9.36 188-311-004 $9.36 188-311-006 $9.36 188-311-007 $9.36 188-311-008 $9.36 188-311-009 $9.36 188-312-003 $9.36 188-312-004 $9.36 188-312-007 $9.36 188-312-009 $9.36 188-312-010 $9.36 188-320-007 $9.36 188-320-008 $9.36 188-320-010 $9.36 188-320-011 $9.36 188-320-012 $9.36 188-320-013 $9.36 188-320-014 $9.36 188-320-015 $9.36 188-320-016 $9.36 188-321-001 $9.36 188-321-002 $9.36 188-321-003 $9.36 188-321-004 $9.36 188-321-007 $9.36 188-321-008 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 188-321-010 $9.36 188-321-011 $9.36 188-330-001 $9.36 188-330-005 $9.36 188-330-011 $9.36 188-330-013 $9.36 188-330-021 $9.36 188-330-022 $9.36 188-330-025 $9.36 188-330-026 $9.36 188-330-027 $9.36 188-330-033 $9.36 188-340-011 $9.36 188-340-012 $9.36 188-340-014 $9.36 188-340-016 $9.36 188-340-019 $9.36 188-340-021 $4.68 188-340-022 $9.36 188-340-023 $9.36 188-340-024 $9.36 188-351-001 $9.36 188-351-002 $9.36 188-351-003 $9.36 188-351-004 $9.36 188-351-005 $9.36 188-351-006 $9.36 188-351-010 $9.36 188-351-011 $9.36 188-351-012 $9.36 188-351-013 $9.36 188-351-014 $9.36 188-351-015 $9.36 188-351-016 $9.36 188-351-019 $9.36 188-351-020 $9.36 188-352-001 $9.36 188-352-002 $9.36 188-353-001 $9.36 188-353-002 $9.36 188-353-003 $9.36 188-354-001 $9.36 188-354-002 $9.36 188-354-005 $9.36 188-354-006 $9.36 188-354-007 $9.36 188-354-008 $9.36 188-354-009 $9.36 188-354-010 $9.36 188-354-011 $9.36 188-354-012 $9.36 188-360-002 $9.36 188-360-010 $9.36 188-360-013 $9.36 188-360-015 $9.36 188-360-016 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 188-360-019 $9.36 188-360-020 $9.36 188-360-021 $9.36 188-360-022 $9.36 188-360-023 $9.36 188-360-026 $9.36 188-360-027 $4.68 188-360-028 $9.36 188-360-029 $9.36 188-370-006 $9.36 188-370-007 $9.36 188-370-008 $9.36 188-370-009 $9.36 188-370-010 $9.36 188-370-013 $9.36 188-370-014 $9.36 188-370-015 $9.36 188-370-016 $9.36 188-370-017 $9.36 188-370-018 $9.36 188-370-025 $9.36 188-370-026 $9.36 188-370-027 $9.36 188-370-032 $9.36 188-370-033 $9.36 188-370-035 $9.36 188-370-036 $9.36 188-370-037 $9.36 188-370-038 $9.36 188-381-009 $9.36 188-381-010 $9.36 188-381-011 $9.36 188-381-012 $9.36 188-381-015 $9.36 188-381-019 $9.36 188-381-020 $9.36 188-382-009 $9.36 188-382-010 $9.36 188-382-011 $9.36 188-382-012 $9.36 188-382-013 $9.36 188-382-014 $9.36 188-382-015 $9.36 188-382-017 $9.36 188-391-008 $9.36 188-391-009 $9.36 188-391-010 $9.36 188-391-013 $9.36 188-391-014 $9.36 188-391-015 $9.36 188-391-016 $9.36 188-392-009 $9.36 188-392-010 $4.68 188-392-011 $4.68 188-392-014 $9.36 188-392-015 $9.36 39 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 624 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 36 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2852 MR LEVY CODE: Alamo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 188-392-016 $9.36 188-392-018 $9.36 188-392-019 $9.36 188-401-003 $9.36 188-401-004 $9.36 188-401-005 $9.36 188-402-005 $9.36 188-402-006 $9.36 188-402-007 $9.36 188-402-008 $9.36 188-403-008 $9.36 188-403-009 $9.36 188-403-010 $9.36 188-403-011 $9.36 188-403-012 $9.36 188-403-013 $9.36 188-411-005 $9.36 188-411-012 $4.68 188-411-013 $9.36 188-411-014 $9.36 188-412-001 $9.36 188-412-002 $9.36 188-412-003 $9.36 188-412-004 $4.68 188-412-007 $9.36 188-412-008 $9.36 188-412-009 $9.36 188-412-010 $9.36 188-412-014 $4.68 188-412-015 $9.36 188-420-008 $9.36 188-420-012 $9.36 188-420-013 $9.36 188-420-014 $9.36 188-450-001 $9.36 188-450-002 $9.36 188-450-003 $9.36 188-450-004 $9.36 188-450-005 $9.36 188-450-006 $9.36 188-450-007 $9.36 188-450-008 $9.36 188-450-009 $9.36 188-450-010 $9.36 188-450-011 $9.36 188-450-012 $9.36 188-450-013 $9.36 188-450-014 $9.36 188-450-015 $9.36 188-450-016 $9.36 188-450-017 $9.36 188-450-018 $9.36 188-450-019 $9.36 191-010-007 $9.36 191-010-008 $9.36 191-010-009 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 191-010-010 $9.36 191-010-012 $9.36 191-010-013 $9.36 191-010-016 $9.36 191-010-017 $9.36 191-010-018 $9.36 191-010-019 $9.36 191-010-020 $9.36 191-010-021 $9.36 191-010-022 $9.36 191-010-023 $9.36 191-010-025 $9.36 191-010-026 $9.36 191-010-027 $4.68 191-020-001 $9.36 191-020-002 $9.36 191-020-004 $9.36 191-020-005 $9.36 191-020-006 $9.36 191-020-010 $9.36 191-020-015 $9.36 191-020-016 $9.36 191-020-017 $9.36 191-020-018 $9.36 191-020-019 $9.36 191-020-021 $9.36 191-020-022 $9.36 191-020-023 $9.36 191-020-025 $9.36 191-020-026 $9.36 191-020-027 $9.36 191-020-030 $9.36 191-020-036 $9.36 191-020-037 $9.36 191-020-038 $9.36 191-020-039 $9.36 191-020-040 $9.36 191-020-041 $9.36 191-020-044 $9.36 191-020-045 $9.36 191-020-051 $9.36 191-020-053 $9.36 191-020-054 $9.36 191-020-055 $9.36 191-020-056 $9.36 191-020-057 $9.36 191-020-059 $9.36 191-020-060 $9.36 191-020-063 $9.36 191-030-002 $9.36 191-030-004 $9.36 191-030-008 $9.36 191-030-011 $9.36 191-030-012 $9.36 191-030-013 $9.36 191-030-014 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 191-030-015 $9.36 191-030-017 $9.36 191-030-018 $9.36 191-030-019 $9.36 191-030-020 $9.36 191-030-022 $9.36 191-030-023 $9.36 191-030-024 $9.36 191-030-025 $9.36 191-030-026 $9.36 191-030-027 $9.36 191-030-028 $9.36 191-040-001 $9.36 191-040-003 $9.36 191-040-006 $9.36 191-040-009 $9.36 191-040-010 $9.36 191-040-011 $9.36 191-040-012 $9.36 191-040-014 $9.36 191-040-015 $9.36 191-040-016 $9.36 191-040-017 $9.36 191-040-018 $9.36 191-040-019 $9.36 191-040-021 $9.36 191-040-023 $4.68 191-040-024 $9.36 191-040-025 $9.36 191-040-028 $9.36 191-040-029 $9.36 191-040-030 $9.36 191-040-031 $9.36 191-040-032 $9.36 191-050-006 $9.36 191-050-008 $9.36 191-050-009 $9.36 191-050-011 $9.36 191-050-012 $9.36 191-050-015 $9.36 191-050-018 $9.36 191-050-021 $9.36 191-050-022 $9.36 191-050-023 $9.36 191-050-024 $9.36 191-050-026 $9.36 191-050-027 $4.68 191-050-030 $9.36 191-050-033 $9.36 191-050-035 $9.36 191-050-036 $9.36 191-050-041 $9.36 191-050-042 $9.36 191-050-043 $9.36 191-050-044 $9.36 191-050-045 $4.68 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 191-050-046 $9.36 191-050-047 $9.36 191-050-048 $9.36 191-050-051 $9.36 191-050-052 $9.36 191-050-053 $9.36 191-050-054 $9.36 191-050-055 $9.36 191-050-056 $9.36 191-061-001 $9.36 191-061-004 $9.36 191-061-005 $9.36 191-061-006 $9.36 191-061-007 $9.36 191-061-008 $9.36 191-061-009 $9.36 191-061-010 $9.36 191-062-001 $9.36 191-062-002 $9.36 191-062-003 $9.36 191-062-004 $9.36 191-062-007 $9.36 191-062-008 $9.36 191-062-009 $9.36 191-062-010 $9.36 191-062-011 $9.36 191-062-012 $9.36 191-062-013 $9.36 191-062-014 $9.36 191-062-015 $9.36 191-062-016 $9.36 191-062-017 $9.36 191-062-018 $9.36 191-062-019 $9.36 191-062-020 $9.36 191-062-022 $9.36 191-062-025 $9.36 191-062-026 $9.36 191-062-027 $9.36 191-062-028 $9.36 191-070-002 $9.36 191-070-006 $9.36 191-070-008 $9.36 191-070-009 $9.36 191-070-010 $9.36 191-070-011 $9.36 191-070-014 $9.36 191-070-015 $9.36 191-070-016 $9.36 191-070-017 $9.36 191-070-018 $9.36 191-070-019 $9.36 191-071-001 $9.36 191-071-002 $9.36 191-071-003 $9.36 191-071-004 $9.36 40 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 625 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 36 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2852 MR LEVY CODE: Alamo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 191-071-005 $9.36 191-071-006 $9.36 191-071-007 $9.36 191-071-008 $9.36 191-071-009 $9.36 191-080-001 $9.36 191-080-002 $9.36 191-080-003 $9.36 191-080-004 $9.36 191-080-005 $9.36 191-080-006 $9.36 191-080-007 $9.36 191-080-011 $9.36 191-080-012 $9.36 191-080-013 $9.36 191-080-015 $9.36 191-080-021 $9.36 191-080-024 $9.36 191-080-026 $9.36 191-080-027 $9.36 191-080-030 $9.36 191-080-031 $9.36 191-080-032 $9.36 191-080-033 $9.36 191-080-034 $9.36 191-080-035 $9.36 191-080-036 $9.36 191-080-037 $9.36 191-080-038 $9.36 191-080-039 $9.36 191-080-040 $9.36 191-080-041 $9.36 191-080-042 $9.36 191-080-046 $9.36 191-080-047 $9.36 191-080-048 $9.36 191-080-049 $9.36 191-080-050 $9.36 191-080-051 $14.04 191-093-006 $9.36 191-093-007 $9.36 191-093-008 $9.36 191-093-009 $9.36 191-093-010 $9.36 191-093-013 $9.36 191-093-014 $9.36 191-093-015 $9.36 191-093-016 $9.36 191-093-017 $9.36 191-093-019 $9.36 191-093-020 $9.36 191-093-021 $9.36 191-093-022 $9.36 191-093-028 $9.36 191-093-030 $9.36 191-093-031 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 191-093-032 $9.36 191-093-033 $9.36 191-093-036 $9.36 191-093-037 $9.36 191-093-043 $14.04 191-093-044 $9.36 191-093-045 $9.36 191-093-046 $9.36 191-093-048 $12.54 191-094-001 $9.36 191-094-002 $9.36 191-094-003 $9.36 191-094-004 $9.36 191-094-005 $9.36 191-094-006 $9.36 191-094-007 $9.36 191-094-008 $9.36 191-094-009 $9.36 191-094-010 $9.36 191-094-011 $9.36 191-094-012 $9.36 191-095-003 $9.36 191-095-004 $9.36 191-095-005 $9.36 191-095-006 $9.36 191-095-007 $9.36 191-095-008 $9.36 191-095-009 $9.36 191-095-010 $9.36 191-095-011 $9.36 191-095-012 $9.36 191-100-001 $9.36 191-100-004 $9.36 191-100-005 $9.36 191-110-002 $9.36 191-110-006 $9.36 191-110-008 $9.36 191-110-009 $9.36 191-110-010 $9.36 191-120-010 $9.36 191-120-012 $9.36 191-120-013 $9.36 191-120-015 $4.68 191-120-016 $9.36 191-120-017 $4.68 191-130-001 $9.36 191-130-002 $9.36 191-130-003 $9.36 191-150-001 $9.36 191-150-009 $9.36 191-150-010 $9.36 191-150-011 $9.36 191-161-001 $9.36 191-161-002 $9.36 191-161-003 $9.36 191-162-004 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 191-162-005 $9.36 191-162-006 $9.36 191-170-001 $9.36 191-170-002 $9.36 191-170-003 $9.36 191-170-004 $9.36 191-170-005 $9.36 191-170-006 $9.36 191-170-007 $9.36 191-170-008 $9.36 191-170-009 $9.36 191-170-010 $9.36 191-170-011 $9.36 191-170-012 $9.36 191-170-013 $9.36 191-170-014 $9.36 191-170-015 $9.36 191-170-016 $9.36 191-170-017 $9.36 191-170-018 $9.36 191-170-019 $9.36 191-170-020 $9.36 191-170-021 $9.36 191-170-022 $9.36 191-180-001 $9.36 191-180-002 $9.36 191-180-003 $9.36 191-180-004 $9.36 191-180-005 $9.36 191-180-006 $9.36 191-180-007 $9.36 191-180-008 $9.36 191-180-009 $9.36 191-180-010 $9.36 191-180-011 $9.36 191-180-012 $9.36 191-180-013 $9.36 191-180-014 $9.36 191-180-015 $9.36 191-180-016 $9.36 191-180-017 $9.36 192-011-006 $9.36 192-011-009 $9.36 192-011-010 $9.36 192-011-011 $9.36 192-011-012 $9.36 192-011-013 $9.36 192-011-014 $9.36 192-011-015 $9.36 192-011-020 $9.36 192-011-027 $9.36 192-011-032 $9.36 192-011-041 $9.36 192-011-043 $9.36 192-011-046 $9.36 192-011-047 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 192-011-048 $9.36 192-011-049 $9.36 192-011-050 $9.36 192-011-051 $9.36 192-011-052 $9.36 192-011-053 $9.36 192-011-054 $9.36 192-011-057 $9.36 192-012-001 $9.36 192-012-002 $9.36 192-012-003 $9.36 192-012-004 $9.36 192-012-005 $9.36 192-012-006 $9.36 192-012-007 $9.36 192-012-008 $9.36 192-020-001 $9.36 192-020-002 $9.36 192-020-003 $9.36 192-020-004 $9.36 192-020-005 $9.36 192-020-007 $9.36 192-020-008 $9.36 192-020-009 $9.36 192-020-010 $9.36 192-020-011 $9.36 192-020-012 $9.36 192-020-013 $9.36 192-020-014 $9.36 192-020-015 $9.36 192-020-016 $9.36 192-020-017 $9.36 192-020-018 $9.36 192-020-019 $9.36 192-020-021 $9.36 192-020-022 $9.36 192-020-027 $9.36 192-020-028 $9.36 192-020-029 $9.36 192-020-030 $9.36 192-020-031 $9.36 192-020-032 $9.36 192-020-033 $9.36 192-020-034 $9.36 192-020-035 $9.36 192-020-036 $9.36 192-020-037 $9.36 192-020-039 $9.36 192-020-041 $9.36 192-020-045 $9.36 192-020-046 $9.36 192-020-047 $9.36 192-020-048 $9.36 192-020-049 $9.36 192-020-050 $9.36 192-020-051 $9.36 41 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 626 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 36 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2852 MR LEVY CODE: Alamo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 192-020-052 $9.36 192-020-053 $9.36 192-020-054 $9.36 192-020-055 $9.36 192-030-002 $9.36 192-030-003 $9.36 192-030-004 $9.36 192-030-005 $9.36 192-030-006 $9.36 192-030-007 $9.36 192-030-011 $9.36 192-030-012 $9.36 192-030-013 $9.36 192-030-014 $9.36 192-030-015 $9.36 192-030-016 $9.36 192-030-017 $9.36 192-030-018 $9.36 192-030-020 $9.36 192-030-021 $9.36 192-030-022 $9.36 192-030-023 $9.36 192-030-024 $9.36 192-030-025 $9.36 192-030-026 $9.36 192-030-030 $9.36 192-030-033 $9.36 192-030-036 $9.36 192-030-037 $9.36 192-030-040 $9.36 192-030-041 $9.36 192-030-042 $9.36 192-030-043 $9.36 192-030-044 $9.36 192-030-045 $9.36 192-030-048 $9.36 192-030-049 $9.36 192-030-050 $9.36 192-030-051 $9.36 192-030-054 $9.36 192-030-055 $9.36 192-030-056 $9.36 192-041-001 $9.36 192-041-002 $9.36 192-041-004 $9.36 192-041-005 $9.36 192-041-007 $9.36 192-041-008 $9.36 192-041-009 $9.36 192-041-010 $9.36 192-041-011 $9.36 192-041-012 $9.36 192-041-013 $9.36 192-041-014 $9.36 192-041-015 $9.36 192-041-016 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 192-041-017 $9.36 192-041-018 $9.36 192-041-019 $9.36 192-041-020 $9.36 192-041-021 $9.36 192-041-022 $9.36 192-041-023 $9.36 192-042-001 $9.36 192-042-002 $9.36 192-042-003 $9.36 192-042-004 $9.36 192-042-005 $9.36 192-042-006 $9.36 192-042-007 $9.36 192-042-008 $9.36 192-042-009 $9.36 192-042-010 $9.36 192-050-001 $9.36 192-050-002 $9.36 192-050-003 $9.36 192-050-004 $9.36 192-050-005 $9.36 192-050-006 $9.36 192-050-007 $9.36 192-050-008 $9.36 192-050-009 $9.36 192-050-012 $9.36 192-050-013 $9.36 192-050-014 $9.36 192-050-016 $9.36 192-050-017 $9.36 192-050-018 $9.36 192-050-020 $9.36 192-050-021 $9.36 192-050-022 $9.36 192-050-023 $9.36 192-050-024 $9.36 192-050-025 $9.36 192-050-026 $9.36 192-050-027 $9.36 192-060-001 $9.36 192-060-002 $9.36 192-060-004 $9.36 192-060-005 $9.36 192-060-009 $9.36 192-060-011 $9.36 192-060-014 $9.36 192-060-016 $9.36 192-060-017 $9.36 192-060-022 $9.36 192-060-023 $9.36 192-060-026 $9.36 192-060-027 $9.36 192-060-033 $9.36 192-071-005 $9.36 192-071-006 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 192-071-007 $9.36 192-071-008 $9.36 192-071-015 $9.36 192-071-016 $9.36 192-071-017 $9.36 192-071-018 $9.36 192-071-019 $9.36 192-071-020 $9.36 192-071-021 $9.36 192-071-022 $9.36 192-071-024 $9.36 192-071-025 $9.36 192-071-030 $9.36 192-071-036 $9.36 192-071-046 $9.36 192-071-047 $9.36 192-071-048 $9.36 192-071-049 $9.36 192-071-050 $9.36 192-071-051 $9.36 192-071-052 $9.36 192-071-053 $9.36 192-071-054 $9.36 192-071-055 $9.36 192-071-056 $9.36 192-071-057 $9.36 192-071-058 $9.36 192-071-059 $9.36 192-071-060 $9.36 192-071-061 $9.36 192-071-062 $9.64 192-071-064 $19.84 192-072-003 $9.36 192-072-008 $9.36 192-072-009 $9.36 192-072-011 $9.36 192-072-013 $9.36 192-072-015 $9.36 192-072-020 $9.36 192-072-021 $9.36 192-081-003 $9.36 192-081-004 $28.08 192-082-001 $9.36 192-082-002 $9.36 192-082-003 $9.36 192-082-005 $4.68 192-090-003 $9.36 192-090-004 $9.36 192-090-005 $9.36 192-090-006 $9.36 192-090-007 $9.36 192-090-008 $9.36 192-090-009 $9.36 192-090-010 $9.36 192-090-011 $9.36 192-090-012 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 192-090-013 $9.36 192-090-014 $9.36 192-090-015 $9.36 192-090-016 $9.36 192-090-017 $9.36 192-090-018 $9.36 192-090-019 $9.36 192-110-004 $9.36 192-110-006 $9.36 192-110-007 $9.36 192-110-009 $9.36 192-110-010 $9.36 192-110-011 $9.36 192-110-014 $9.36 192-110-018 $9.36 192-110-019 $9.36 192-110-020 $9.36 192-110-021 $9.36 192-110-022 $9.36 192-110-023 $9.36 192-110-024 $16.38 192-120-001 $9.36 192-120-002 $9.36 192-120-003 $9.36 192-120-012 $9.36 192-120-013 $9.36 192-120-014 $9.36 192-120-018 $9.36 192-120-026 $9.36 192-120-027 $9.36 192-120-028 $9.36 192-120-030 $9.36 192-120-031 $9.36 192-120-034 $9.36 192-120-035 $9.36 192-120-036 $9.36 192-120-037 $9.36 192-120-039 $9.36 192-120-040 $9.36 192-120-041 $9.36 192-120-042 $9.36 192-120-043 $9.36 192-120-044 $9.36 192-120-045 $9.36 192-120-046 $9.36 192-120-047 $9.36 192-131-001 $9.36 192-132-001 $9.36 192-132-002 $9.36 192-133-002 $9.36 192-133-003 $9.36 192-133-004 $9.36 192-134-001 $9.36 192-134-002 $9.36 192-134-003 $9.36 192-134-004 $9.36 42 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 627 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 36 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2852 MR LEVY CODE: Alamo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 192-134-005 $9.36 192-134-006 $9.36 192-134-007 $9.36 192-134-009 $9.36 192-134-012 $9.36 192-134-013 $9.36 192-134-014 $9.36 192-134-015 $9.36 192-134-016 $9.36 192-134-017 $9.36 192-134-020 $9.36 192-134-022 $9.36 192-134-026 $9.36 192-134-027 $9.36 192-134-030 $9.36 192-134-031 $9.36 192-134-032 $9.36 192-134-033 $9.36 192-134-034 $9.36 192-134-035 $9.36 192-134-036 $9.36 192-134-037 $9.36 192-141-001 $9.36 192-141-002 $9.36 192-141-003 $9.36 192-141-004 $9.36 192-141-005 $9.36 192-141-009 $9.36 192-142-008 $9.36 192-142-009 $9.36 192-142-010 $9.36 192-142-011 $9.36 192-142-012 $9.36 192-142-013 $9.36 192-142-014 $9.36 192-142-015 $9.36 192-142-016 $9.36 192-142-017 $9.36 192-142-023 $9.36 192-142-027 $9.36 192-142-028 $9.36 192-142-029 $9.36 192-142-030 $9.36 192-142-031 $9.36 192-142-032 $9.36 192-142-035 $9.36 192-142-036 $9.36 192-142-037 $9.36 192-142-038 $9.36 192-150-009 $9.36 192-150-010 $9.36 192-150-011 $9.36 192-150-013 $9.36 192-150-014 $9.36 192-150-015 $9.36 192-150-016 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 192-150-029 $9.36 192-150-031 $9.36 192-150-033 $9.36 192-161-001 $9.36 192-161-002 $9.36 192-161-003 $9.36 192-161-004 $9.36 192-161-005 $9.36 192-161-006 $9.36 192-161-007 $9.36 192-162-001 $9.36 192-162-002 $9.36 192-162-003 $9.36 192-162-004 $9.36 192-162-005 $9.36 192-162-006 $9.36 192-162-007 $9.36 192-162-008 $9.36 192-162-009 $9.36 192-162-010 $9.36 192-162-011 $9.36 192-162-012 $9.36 192-163-001 $9.36 192-163-002 $9.36 192-163-003 $9.36 192-163-004 $9.36 192-164-001 $9.36 192-164-002 $9.36 192-164-003 $9.36 192-164-004 $9.36 192-164-005 $9.36 192-164-006 $9.36 192-164-007 $9.36 192-164-008 $9.36 192-164-009 $9.36 192-164-010 $9.36 192-164-011 $9.36 192-170-044 $9.36 192-170-045 $9.36 192-170-046 $9.36 192-170-047 $9.36 192-170-053 $9.36 192-170-054 $9.36 192-170-055 $9.36 192-170-057 $9.36 192-170-058 $9.36 192-181-001 $9.36 192-181-002 $9.36 192-181-003 $9.36 192-181-004 $9.36 192-181-005 $9.36 192-181-006 $9.36 192-181-007 $9.36 192-182-001 $9.36 192-182-002 $9.36 192-182-003 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 192-182-004 $9.36 192-182-005 $9.36 192-182-006 $9.36 192-191-001 $9.36 192-191-002 $9.36 192-191-003 $9.36 192-191-004 $9.36 192-191-005 $9.36 192-192-001 $9.36 192-192-002 $9.36 192-192-003 $9.36 192-192-004 $9.36 192-192-005 $9.36 192-192-006 $9.36 192-192-007 $9.36 192-192-008 $9.36 192-192-009 $9.36 192-192-010 $9.36 192-192-011 $9.36 192-192-012 $9.36 192-192-013 $9.36 192-192-014 $9.36 192-200-006 $4.68 192-200-007 $9.36 192-200-008 $9.36 192-200-009 $9.36 192-200-010 $9.36 192-200-013 $9.36 192-200-022 $9.36 192-200-027 $9.36 192-200-028 $9.36 192-200-036 $9.36 192-200-037 $4.68 192-200-038 $9.36 192-200-039 $9.36 192-200-040 $9.36 192-200-041 $9.36 192-200-042 $9.36 192-200-043 $9.36 192-200-044 $9.36 192-200-047 $9.36 192-200-049 $9.36 192-200-052 $4.68 192-200-054 $9.36 192-200-055 $9.36 192-210-002 $9.36 192-210-006 $9.36 192-210-007 $9.36 192-210-011 $4.68 192-210-013 $9.36 192-210-014 $9.36 192-210-016 $9.36 192-210-019 $9.36 192-210-020 $9.36 192-210-021 $9.36 192-210-022 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 192-210-023 $9.36 192-210-024 $9.36 192-210-025 $9.36 192-210-027 $9.36 192-210-028 $9.36 192-210-029 $4.68 192-210-030 $4.68 192-210-031 $9.36 192-220-009 $9.36 192-220-012 $9.36 192-220-013 $9.36 192-220-014 $9.36 192-220-015 $9.36 192-220-016 $9.36 192-220-017 $9.36 192-220-018 $9.36 192-220-019 $9.36 192-220-020 $9.36 192-220-021 $9.36 192-220-022 $9.36 192-220-023 $9.36 192-220-024 $9.36 192-230-003 $9.36 192-230-008 $9.36 192-230-009 $9.36 192-230-013 $9.36 192-230-014 $4.68 192-230-015 $9.36 192-230-016 $9.36 192-230-019 $9.36 192-230-020 $9.36 192-230-023 $9.36 192-230-024 $9.36 192-230-026 $9.36 192-230-027 $9.36 192-230-028 $9.36 192-230-029 $9.36 192-230-030 $9.36 192-230-031 $9.36 192-230-032 $9.36 192-230-033 $9.36 192-230-034 $9.36 192-230-035 $9.36 192-240-005 $9.36 192-240-011 $9.36 192-240-014 $9.36 192-240-015 $9.36 192-240-016 $9.36 192-240-018 $9.36 192-240-019 $9.36 192-240-020 $9.36 192-240-021 $9.36 192-240-022 $9.36 192-240-023 $9.36 192-250-002 $9.36 192-260-004 $9.36 43 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 628 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 36 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2852 MR LEVY CODE: Alamo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 192-260-007 $9.36 192-260-008 $9.36 192-260-010 $9.36 192-260-011 $9.36 192-260-014 $4.68 192-260-019 $9.36 192-260-020 $4.68 192-260-021 $9.36 192-260-022 $4.68 192-271-003 $9.36 192-271-013 $9.36 192-271-014 $9.36 192-271-016 $9.36 192-271-018 $9.36 192-271-019 $9.36 192-271-021 $9.36 192-271-022 $9.36 192-271-023 $9.36 192-271-024 $9.36 192-272-011 $9.36 192-272-012 $9.36 192-272-013 $9.36 192-272-014 $9.36 192-280-003 $9.36 192-280-008 $9.36 192-280-009 $9.36 192-280-010 $9.36 192-280-012 $9.36 192-280-013 $9.36 192-280-015 $9.36 192-280-016 $9.36 192-280-017 $9.36 192-280-018 $9.36 192-290-004 $9.36 192-290-010 $9.36 192-290-011 $9.36 192-290-012 $9.36 192-290-013 $9.36 192-290-014 $9.36 192-290-015 $9.36 192-290-016 $9.36 192-290-017 $9.36 192-290-018 $9.36 192-290-019 $9.36 192-290-020 $9.36 192-290-021 $9.36 192-290-022 $9.36 192-290-023 $9.36 192-290-024 $9.36 192-300-001 $9.36 192-300-005 $9.36 192-300-006 $9.36 192-300-007 $9.36 192-300-008 $9.36 192-300-013 $9.36 192-300-014 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 192-300-015 $9.36 192-300-016 $9.36 192-300-017 $9.36 192-300-018 $9.36 192-300-019 $9.36 192-300-020 $9.36 192-300-021 $9.36 192-300-022 $9.36 192-300-023 $9.36 192-300-024 $9.36 192-300-025 $9.36 192-300-026 $9.36 192-300-027 $9.36 192-310-001 $9.36 192-310-002 $9.36 192-310-005 $9.36 192-310-007 $9.36 192-310-009 $9.36 192-310-011 $9.36 192-310-012 $9.36 192-310-015 $9.36 192-310-016 $9.36 192-310-017 $9.36 192-310-020 $9.36 192-310-021 $9.36 192-310-022 $9.36 192-310-023 $9.36 192-310-024 $9.36 192-310-025 $9.36 192-320-002 $9.36 192-320-003 $9.36 192-320-005 $9.36 192-320-006 $9.36 192-320-007 $9.36 192-320-010 $9.36 192-320-011 $9.36 192-320-012 $9.36 192-320-013 $9.36 192-320-014 $9.36 192-331-001 $9.36 192-331-002 $9.36 192-331-003 $9.36 192-331-004 $9.36 192-331-005 $9.36 192-331-006 $9.36 192-331-007 $9.36 192-331-008 $9.36 192-331-009 $9.36 192-332-001 $9.36 192-332-002 $9.36 192-332-003 $9.36 192-332-006 $9.36 192-332-007 $9.36 192-332-008 $9.36 192-333-001 $9.36 192-333-002 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 192-333-003 $9.36 192-333-004 $9.36 192-333-005 $9.36 192-340-001 $9.36 192-340-002 $9.36 192-340-003 $9.36 192-340-004 $9.36 192-340-005 $9.36 192-340-006 $9.36 192-340-007 $9.36 192-340-008 $9.36 192-340-009 $9.36 192-340-010 $9.36 192-340-011 $9.36 192-340-012 $9.36 192-340-013 $9.36 192-340-014 $9.36 192-340-015 $9.36 192-340-016 $9.36 192-340-017 $9.36 192-340-018 $9.36 192-350-001 $9.36 192-350-002 $9.36 192-350-003 $9.36 192-350-004 $9.36 192-360-001 $9.36 192-360-002 $9.36 192-360-003 $9.36 192-360-004 $4.68 192-360-005 $9.36 192-360-006 $9.36 192-360-007 $9.36 192-360-008 $9.36 192-360-009 $9.36 192-360-010 $9.36 192-370-001 $9.36 192-370-002 $9.36 192-370-003 $9.36 192-370-004 $9.36 193-010-005 $9.36 193-010-013 $9.36 193-010-014 $9.36 193-010-023 $4.68 193-010-024 $4.68 193-010-025 $9.36 193-010-026 $9.36 193-010-027 $4.68 193-010-028 $9.36 193-010-029 $4.68 193-010-030 $4.68 193-010-031 $9.36 193-010-032 $4.68 193-010-033 $4.68 193-010-034 $9.36 193-010-035 $9.36 193-010-036 $4.68 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 193-010-037 $9.36 193-010-038 $9.36 193-020-002 $9.36 193-020-009 $9.36 193-020-010 $9.36 193-020-011 $9.36 193-020-012 $9.36 193-030-004 $9.36 193-030-005 $9.36 193-030-006 $9.36 193-030-010 $9.36 193-030-016 $9.36 193-030-017 $9.36 193-030-018 $9.36 193-030-019 $4.68 193-030-020 $4.68 193-030-021 $4.68 193-030-022 $9.36 193-030-026 $9.36 193-030-027 $9.36 193-050-003 $9.36 193-050-004 $9.36 193-050-005 $9.36 193-050-008 $9.36 193-050-009 $9.36 193-050-010 $9.36 193-050-011 $9.36 193-050-018 $9.36 193-050-019 $9.36 193-050-020 $9.36 193-050-022 $9.36 193-050-023 $9.36 193-050-024 $9.36 193-050-025 $9.36 193-050-026 $9.36 193-050-027 $9.36 193-050-028 $9.36 193-050-029 $9.36 193-050-030 $9.36 193-060-003 $9.36 193-060-008 $9.36 193-060-010 $9.36 193-060-011 $9.36 193-060-012 $9.36 193-060-014 $9.36 193-060-015 $9.36 193-060-016 $9.36 193-060-018 $9.36 193-060-019 $9.36 193-060-020 $9.36 193-060-022 $9.36 193-060-025 $9.36 193-060-026 $9.36 193-060-027 $4.68 193-060-028 $9.36 193-060-029 $9.36 44 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 629 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 36 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2852 MR LEVY CODE: Alamo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 193-060-030 $9.36 193-060-031 $9.36 193-060-032 $9.36 193-070-022 $9.36 193-070-028 $9.36 193-070-029 $9.36 193-070-030 $9.36 193-070-031 $9.36 193-070-032 $9.36 193-070-033 $9.36 193-070-034 $9.36 193-070-035 $9.36 193-070-036 $9.36 193-070-037 $9.36 193-070-038 $9.36 193-070-039 $9.36 193-070-040 $9.36 193-070-041 $9.36 193-070-042 $9.36 193-070-043 $9.36 193-070-044 $9.36 193-070-045 $9.36 193-080-002 $9.36 193-080-013 $9.36 193-080-015 $9.36 193-080-016 $9.36 193-080-025 $9.36 193-080-026 $9.36 193-080-027 $9.36 193-080-030 $9.36 193-080-032 $9.36 193-080-037 $9.36 193-080-042 $9.36 193-080-043 $9.36 193-080-044 $9.36 193-080-045 $9.36 193-080-046 $9.36 193-080-051 $9.36 193-080-056 $9.36 193-080-057 $9.36 193-080-058 $9.36 193-080-059 $9.36 193-080-060 $9.36 193-080-061 $9.36 193-080-063 $9.36 193-080-064 $9.36 193-080-065 $9.36 193-080-066 $9.36 193-080-072 $9.36 193-080-073 $9.36 193-080-074 $9.36 193-080-075 $9.36 193-080-077 $9.36 193-080-079 $4.68 193-080-091 $9.36 193-080-094 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 193-080-095 $4.68 193-080-098 $9.36 193-080-105 $9.36 193-080-106 $9.36 193-080-107 $4.68 193-080-110 $9.36 193-080-113 $9.36 193-080-116 $9.36 193-080-117 $9.36 193-080-118 $9.36 193-090-003 $9.36 193-090-004 $9.36 193-090-008 $9.36 193-090-009 $9.36 193-090-010 $9.36 193-090-015 $9.36 193-090-016 $9.36 193-090-018 $9.36 193-090-019 $9.36 193-090-020 $9.36 193-090-021 $9.36 193-090-022 $9.36 193-090-023 $9.36 193-090-024 $9.36 193-090-025 $9.36 193-090-026 $9.36 193-090-027 $9.36 193-090-028 $9.36 193-090-029 $9.36 193-090-030 $9.36 193-090-031 $9.36 193-100-001 $9.36 193-100-002 $9.36 193-100-003 $9.36 193-100-004 $9.36 193-100-008 $9.36 193-100-009 $9.36 193-100-014 $9.36 193-100-015 $9.36 193-100-016 $9.36 193-100-017 $9.36 193-100-018 $9.36 193-111-001 $9.36 193-111-002 $9.36 193-111-003 $9.36 193-111-004 $9.36 193-111-005 $9.36 193-111-006 $9.36 193-111-007 $9.36 193-111-011 $9.36 193-111-012 $9.36 193-111-013 $9.36 193-111-014 $9.36 193-111-016 $9.36 193-111-017 $9.36 193-111-018 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 193-111-020 $9.36 193-111-021 $9.36 193-112-001 $9.36 193-112-004 $9.36 193-112-005 $9.36 193-112-006 $9.36 193-112-007 $9.36 193-112-008 $9.36 193-112-009 $9.36 193-112-010 $9.36 193-112-011 $9.36 193-112-012 $9.36 193-112-013 $9.36 193-112-014 $9.36 193-112-015 $9.36 193-114-001 $9.36 193-114-002 $9.36 193-130-001 $9.36 193-130-008 $9.36 193-130-009 $9.36 193-130-010 $9.36 193-130-011 $9.36 193-130-012 $9.36 193-130-013 $9.36 193-130-014 $9.36 193-130-015 $9.36 193-130-016 $9.36 193-130-017 $9.36 193-130-018 $9.36 193-130-019 $9.36 193-130-020 $9.36 193-130-021 $9.36 193-130-022 $9.36 193-130-028 $9.36 193-130-029 $9.36 193-130-031 $9.36 193-130-032 $9.36 193-140-010 $9.36 193-140-011 $9.36 193-140-012 $9.36 193-140-013 $9.36 193-140-014 $9.36 193-140-015 $9.36 193-140-016 $9.36 193-140-017 $9.36 193-140-018 $9.36 193-140-019 $9.36 193-140-021 $9.36 193-140-022 $9.36 193-140-023 $9.36 193-140-024 $9.36 193-140-025 $9.36 193-140-027 $9.36 193-140-028 $9.36 193-141-001 $9.36 193-141-002 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 193-141-003 $9.36 193-160-018 $14.04 193-160-020 $14.04 193-180-024 $9.36 193-180-026 $9.36 193-180-027 $9.36 193-180-030 $9.36 193-180-032 $9.36 193-180-033 $9.36 193-180-034 $9.36 193-180-035 $9.36 193-180-036 $9.36 193-210-008 $9.36 193-210-017 $9.36 193-210-018 $9.36 193-210-019 $9.36 193-210-020 $9.36 193-210-021 $9.36 193-210-022 $9.36 193-210-023 $9.36 193-210-024 $9.36 193-210-025 $9.36 193-221-004 $9.36 193-221-005 $9.36 193-221-006 $9.36 193-221-007 $9.36 193-221-008 $9.36 193-221-009 $9.36 193-221-010 $9.36 193-222-001 $9.36 193-222-002 $9.36 193-222-003 $9.36 193-222-004 $9.36 193-222-005 $9.36 193-222-006 $9.36 193-222-007 $9.36 193-222-011 $9.36 193-222-012 $9.36 193-222-013 $9.36 193-222-014 $9.36 193-222-015 $9.36 193-222-016 $9.36 193-222-017 $9.36 193-222-018 $9.36 193-223-004 $4.68 193-223-005 $9.36 193-223-006 $9.36 193-223-007 $9.36 193-231-001 $9.36 193-231-002 $9.36 193-231-003 $9.36 193-232-001 $9.36 193-232-002 $9.36 193-232-003 $9.36 193-232-004 $9.36 193-232-005 $9.36 45 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 630 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 36 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2852 MR LEVY CODE: Alamo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 193-232-006 $9.36 193-232-007 $9.36 193-232-008 $9.36 193-232-009 $9.36 193-232-010 $9.36 193-234-001 $9.36 193-234-002 $9.36 193-234-003 $9.36 193-234-004 $9.36 193-234-005 $9.36 193-234-006 $9.36 193-234-007 $9.36 193-234-008 $9.36 193-234-009 $9.36 193-241-006 $9.36 193-241-007 $7.58 193-242-001 $9.36 193-242-002 $9.36 193-242-003 $9.36 193-242-004 $9.36 193-251-001 $9.36 193-251-002 $9.36 193-251-003 $9.36 193-251-004 $9.36 193-251-005 $9.36 193-251-009 $9.36 193-251-011 $9.36 193-251-012 $9.36 193-252-001 $9.36 193-252-002 $9.36 193-252-003 $9.36 193-252-004 $9.36 193-252-008 $9.36 193-252-009 $9.36 193-252-010 $9.36 193-252-011 $9.36 193-252-012 $9.36 193-252-021 $9.36 193-252-023 $9.36 193-252-024 $9.36 193-252-026 $9.36 193-252-027 $9.36 193-252-028 $9.36 193-252-029 $9.36 193-252-030 $4.68 193-252-031 $9.36 193-261-001 $9.36 193-261-002 $9.36 193-261-003 $9.36 193-261-005 $9.36 193-261-006 $9.36 193-261-007 $9.36 193-261-008 $9.36 193-261-009 $9.36 193-261-010 $9.36 193-261-011 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 193-262-001 $9.36 193-262-002 $9.36 193-262-003 $9.36 193-262-004 $9.36 193-262-005 $9.36 193-262-006 $9.36 193-262-008 $14.04 193-262-022 $4.68 193-262-026 $9.36 193-262-027 $9.36 193-262-029 $9.36 193-271-001 $9.36 193-271-002 $9.36 193-271-003 $9.36 193-271-004 $9.36 193-271-005 $9.36 193-271-006 $9.36 193-271-007 $9.36 193-271-008 $9.36 193-272-001 $9.36 193-272-002 $9.36 193-272-003 $9.36 193-272-004 $9.36 193-272-005 $9.36 193-272-006 $9.36 193-272-007 $9.36 193-272-008 $9.36 193-272-009 $9.36 193-272-010 $9.36 193-272-011 $9.36 193-272-012 $9.36 193-273-001 $9.36 193-273-002 $9.36 193-273-003 $9.36 193-273-004 $9.36 193-273-005 $9.36 193-273-006 $9.36 193-273-007 $9.36 193-273-008 $9.36 193-273-009 $9.36 193-273-010 $9.36 193-273-011 $9.36 193-273-012 $9.36 193-273-015 $9.36 193-273-016 $9.36 193-281-001 $9.36 193-281-002 $9.36 193-281-003 $9.36 193-281-004 $9.36 193-281-005 $9.36 193-281-006 $9.36 193-281-007 $9.36 193-281-008 $9.36 193-281-009 $9.36 193-281-010 $9.36 193-282-001 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 193-282-002 $9.36 193-282-003 $9.36 193-282-004 $9.36 193-282-005 $9.36 193-282-006 $9.36 193-282-011 $9.36 193-282-012 $9.36 193-282-014 $9.36 193-282-017 $9.36 193-282-018 $9.36 193-282-019 $9.36 193-283-001 $9.36 193-283-002 $9.36 193-283-003 $9.36 193-283-004 $9.36 193-283-005 $9.36 193-283-006 $9.36 193-283-007 $9.36 193-283-008 $9.36 193-283-009 $9.36 193-283-010 $9.36 193-284-001 $9.36 193-284-002 $9.36 193-284-003 $9.36 193-284-004 $9.36 193-284-005 $9.36 193-284-006 $9.36 193-285-001 $9.36 193-285-002 $9.36 193-285-003 $9.36 193-291-002 $9.36 193-291-003 $9.36 193-291-004 $4.68 193-292-002 $9.36 193-292-003 $9.36 193-292-004 $9.36 193-292-005 $9.36 193-292-006 $9.36 193-293-001 $9.36 193-293-002 $9.36 193-293-003 $9.36 193-293-004 $9.36 193-293-005 $9.36 193-293-006 $9.36 193-293-007 $9.36 193-301-002 $9.36 193-301-003 $9.36 193-301-005 $9.36 193-301-006 $9.36 193-301-008 $9.36 193-302-003 $9.36 193-302-004 $9.36 193-302-005 $9.36 193-302-007 $9.36 193-302-008 $9.36 193-302-010 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 193-302-011 $9.36 193-302-012 $9.36 193-302-015 $9.36 193-302-016 $9.36 193-302-018 $9.36 193-302-019 $9.36 193-302-020 $9.36 193-302-026 $9.36 193-302-027 $9.36 193-302-028 $9.36 193-302-029 $9.36 193-302-032 $9.36 193-302-033 $9.36 193-310-001 $9.36 193-310-002 $9.36 193-310-003 $9.36 193-310-004 $9.36 193-310-005 $9.36 193-310-006 $9.36 193-310-007 $9.36 193-310-008 $9.36 193-310-009 $9.36 193-310-010 $9.36 193-310-011 $9.36 193-310-012 $9.36 193-310-013 $9.36 193-310-014 $9.36 193-310-017 $9.36 193-310-018 $9.36 193-310-019 $9.36 193-310-020 $9.36 193-310-021 $9.36 193-310-022 $9.36 193-310-028 $9.36 193-310-029 $9.36 193-310-030 $9.36 193-310-031 $9.36 193-310-034 $9.36 193-310-035 $9.36 193-310-036 $9.36 193-310-038 $9.36 193-310-039 $9.36 193-320-003 $9.36 193-320-004 $9.36 193-320-007 $9.36 193-320-008 $9.36 193-320-009 $9.36 193-320-010 $9.36 193-320-011 $9.36 193-320-012 $9.36 193-320-014 $9.36 193-320-015 $9.36 193-320-016 $9.36 193-331-001 $9.36 193-331-002 $9.36 193-331-003 $9.36 46 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 631 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 36 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2852 MR LEVY CODE: Alamo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 193-331-004 $9.36 193-331-005 $9.36 193-331-006 $9.36 193-331-007 $9.36 193-331-008 $9.36 193-331-010 $9.36 193-332-001 $9.36 193-332-002 $9.36 193-332-003 $9.36 193-333-001 $9.36 193-333-002 $9.36 193-334-001 $9.36 193-334-002 $9.36 193-334-003 $9.36 193-335-001 $9.36 193-335-002 $9.36 193-335-005 $9.36 193-335-006 $9.36 193-335-007 $9.36 193-335-008 $9.36 193-340-001 $9.36 193-340-002 $9.36 193-340-003 $9.36 193-340-004 $9.36 193-340-005 $9.36 193-340-006 $9.36 193-340-007 $9.36 193-340-009 $9.36 193-340-010 $9.36 193-340-011 $9.36 193-340-012 $9.36 193-340-013 $9.36 193-340-014 $9.36 193-340-015 $9.36 193-340-017 $9.36 193-340-018 $9.36 193-340-019 $9.36 193-340-020 $9.36 193-340-021 $9.36 193-340-022 $9.36 193-340-023 $9.36 193-340-032 $9.36 193-340-036 $9.36 193-340-039 $9.36 193-340-043 $9.36 193-340-044 $9.36 193-340-045 $9.36 193-340-047 $9.36 193-340-048 $9.36 193-340-050 $9.36 193-340-051 $9.36 193-350-002 $9.36 193-350-003 $9.36 193-350-004 $9.36 193-350-005 $9.36 193-350-008 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 193-350-009 $9.36 193-350-010 $9.36 193-350-011 $9.36 193-350-012 $9.36 193-350-013 $9.36 193-350-014 $9.36 193-350-015 $9.36 193-350-016 $9.36 193-350-017 $9.36 193-350-020 $9.36 193-350-021 $9.36 193-350-022 $9.36 193-350-023 $9.36 193-350-024 $9.36 193-350-025 $9.36 193-350-026 $9.36 193-350-027 $9.36 193-350-028 $9.36 193-350-029 $9.36 193-350-030 $9.36 193-350-032 $9.36 193-350-033 $9.36 193-350-034 $9.36 193-350-035 $9.36 193-360-001 $9.36 193-360-004 $9.36 193-360-005 $9.36 193-360-006 $9.36 193-360-007 $9.36 193-360-008 $9.36 193-360-009 $9.36 193-360-010 $9.36 193-360-011 $9.36 193-360-012 $9.36 193-360-013 $9.36 193-360-014 $9.36 193-360-015 $9.36 193-360-016 $9.36 193-360-017 $9.36 193-360-018 $9.36 193-360-019 $9.36 193-370-001 $9.36 193-370-002 $9.36 193-370-003 $9.36 193-370-004 $9.36 193-370-005 $9.36 193-370-006 $9.36 193-370-007 $9.36 193-370-008 $9.36 193-370-009 $9.36 193-381-002 $9.36 193-381-003 $9.36 193-381-004 $9.36 193-381-005 $9.36 193-381-007 $9.36 193-381-008 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 193-382-001 $9.36 193-382-002 $9.36 193-382-003 $9.36 193-382-004 $9.36 193-382-005 $9.36 193-383-001 $9.36 193-383-002 $9.36 193-383-003 $9.36 193-383-004 $9.36 193-383-005 $9.36 193-383-006 $9.36 193-383-007 $9.36 193-384-003 $9.36 193-384-004 $9.36 193-384-005 $9.36 193-390-001 $9.36 193-390-002 $9.36 193-390-003 $9.36 193-390-005 $9.36 193-401-002 $9.36 193-401-003 $9.36 193-401-004 $9.36 193-401-005 $9.36 193-401-006 $9.36 193-401-007 $9.36 193-401-008 $9.36 193-401-009 $9.36 193-401-010 $9.36 193-401-011 $9.36 193-401-012 $9.36 193-401-013 $9.36 193-401-014 $9.36 193-401-015 $9.36 193-401-016 $9.36 193-401-017 $9.36 193-401-018 $9.36 193-401-019 $9.36 193-401-022 $9.36 193-401-023 $9.36 193-401-024 $9.36 193-402-001 $9.36 193-402-002 $9.36 193-410-001 $9.36 193-410-002 $9.36 193-410-003 $9.36 193-410-004 $9.36 193-410-005 $9.36 193-410-006 $9.36 193-410-007 $9.36 193-410-008 $9.36 193-410-009 $9.36 193-410-010 $9.36 193-410-011 $9.36 193-410-012 $9.36 193-410-013 $9.36 193-421-001 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 193-421-002 $9.36 193-421-003 $9.36 193-421-004 $9.36 193-421-005 $9.36 193-421-006 $9.36 193-421-007 $9.36 193-421-008 $9.36 193-421-009 $9.36 193-421-010 $9.36 193-421-011 $9.36 193-421-013 $9.36 193-422-001 $9.36 193-422-002 $9.36 193-422-003 $9.36 193-422-004 $9.36 193-422-005 $9.36 193-422-006 $9.36 193-422-007 $9.36 193-422-008 $9.36 193-422-009 $9.36 193-422-010 $9.36 193-422-011 $9.36 193-422-012 $9.36 193-422-013 $9.36 193-422-014 $9.36 193-422-015 $9.36 193-422-016 $9.36 193-430-001 $9.36 193-430-002 $9.36 193-430-003 $9.36 193-430-004 $9.36 193-430-005 $9.36 193-430-006 $9.36 193-430-011 $9.36 193-430-017 $9.36 193-430-018 $9.36 193-430-019 $9.36 193-430-022 $9.36 193-430-023 $9.36 193-430-028 $9.36 193-430-030 $9.36 193-430-031 $9.36 193-430-032 $9.36 193-430-035 $9.36 193-430-036 $9.36 193-430-037 $9.36 193-441-001 $9.36 193-441-002 $9.36 193-441-003 $9.36 193-441-004 $9.36 193-441-006 $9.36 193-441-008 $9.36 193-441-009 $9.36 193-441-010 $9.36 193-441-011 $9.36 193-442-002 $9.36 47 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 632 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 36 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2852 MR LEVY CODE: Alamo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 193-442-005 $9.36 193-443-001 $9.36 193-443-002 $9.36 193-443-003 $9.36 193-443-004 $9.36 193-443-005 $9.36 193-443-006 $9.36 193-443-007 $9.36 193-443-008 $9.36 193-443-010 $9.36 193-443-011 $9.36 193-443-012 $9.36 193-443-013 $9.36 193-450-008 $4.68 193-450-011 $14.04 193-450-012 $14.04 193-460-001 $14.04 193-460-002 $9.26 193-470-005 $4.68 193-470-014 $5.42 193-470-023 $14.04 193-470-024 $14.04 193-470-025 $10.30 193-482-002 $9.36 193-482-003 $9.36 193-482-004 $9.36 193-482-005 $9.36 193-482-006 $9.36 193-482-007 $9.36 193-482-008 $9.36 193-482-013 $9.36 193-482-014 $9.36 193-482-016 $9.36 193-482-017 $9.36 193-482-018 $9.36 193-482-019 $9.36 193-483-001 $9.36 193-483-002 $9.36 193-483-003 $9.36 193-483-004 $9.36 193-483-005 $9.36 193-491-001 $9.36 193-491-002 $9.36 193-492-001 $9.36 193-492-002 $9.36 193-492-003 $9.36 193-492-007 $9.36 193-492-008 $9.36 193-492-009 $9.36 193-492-012 $9.36 193-492-014 $9.36 193-492-015 $9.36 193-500-002 $9.36 193-500-003 $9.36 193-500-004 $9.36 193-500-005 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 193-500-006 $9.36 193-510-001 $9.36 193-510-002 $9.36 193-510-003 $9.36 193-510-008 $9.36 193-510-009 $9.36 193-510-013 $9.36 193-510-014 $9.36 193-510-015 $9.36 193-510-017 $9.36 193-510-018 $9.36 193-510-019 $9.36 193-531-001 $9.36 193-531-002 $9.36 193-531-003 $9.36 193-531-004 $9.36 193-531-005 $9.36 193-531-006 $9.36 193-531-007 $9.36 193-532-001 $9.36 193-532-002 $9.36 193-532-003 $9.36 193-532-004 $9.36 193-532-005 $9.36 193-532-006 $9.36 193-532-007 $9.36 193-532-008 $9.36 193-533-002 $9.36 193-541-001 $9.36 193-541-002 $9.36 193-541-003 $9.36 193-541-004 $9.36 193-541-005 $9.36 193-541-006 $9.36 193-541-009 $9.36 193-541-010 $9.36 193-541-011 $9.36 193-541-012 $9.36 193-541-013 $9.36 193-541-014 $9.36 193-541-015 $9.36 193-541-016 $9.36 193-541-017 $9.36 193-541-018 $9.36 193-541-019 $9.36 193-541-020 $9.36 193-541-021 $9.36 193-541-022 $9.36 193-541-023 $9.36 193-541-024 $9.36 193-541-025 $9.36 193-541-026 $9.36 193-541-027 $9.36 193-541-030 $9.36 193-541-031 $9.36 193-542-001 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 193-542-002 $9.36 193-542-003 $9.36 193-542-004 $9.36 193-542-005 $9.36 193-542-006 $9.36 193-542-007 $9.36 193-551-001 $9.36 193-551-002 $9.36 193-551-003 $9.36 193-552-001 $9.36 193-552-002 $9.36 193-552-003 $9.36 193-552-004 $9.36 193-552-005 $9.36 193-552-006 $9.36 193-552-007 $9.36 193-552-008 $9.36 193-552-009 $9.36 193-552-010 $9.36 193-552-013 $9.36 193-552-014 $9.36 193-552-015 $9.36 193-552-016 $9.36 193-552-017 $9.36 193-552-018 $9.36 193-552-021 $9.36 193-552-022 $9.36 193-560-002 $9.36 193-560-003 $9.36 193-560-004 $9.36 193-560-005 $9.36 193-560-006 $9.36 193-560-007 $9.36 193-560-008 $9.36 193-560-009 $9.36 193-560-010 $9.36 193-560-011 $9.36 193-560-012 $9.36 193-560-013 $9.36 193-560-014 $9.36 193-560-016 $9.36 193-570-001 $9.36 193-570-002 $9.36 193-570-003 $9.36 193-570-004 $9.36 193-570-005 $9.36 193-570-006 $9.36 193-570-009 $9.36 193-570-010 $9.36 193-570-011 $9.36 193-570-012 $9.36 193-570-015 $9.36 193-570-016 $9.36 193-570-017 $9.36 193-570-019 $9.36 193-570-020 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 193-570-022 $9.36 193-570-023 $4.68 193-570-026 $9.36 193-580-001 $9.36 193-580-002 $9.36 193-580-003 $9.36 193-580-004 $9.36 193-580-005 $9.36 193-580-006 $9.36 193-580-007 $9.36 193-580-008 $9.36 193-580-009 $9.36 193-580-010 $9.36 193-580-011 $9.36 193-580-012 $9.36 193-580-013 $9.36 193-580-014 $9.36 193-580-015 $9.36 193-580-016 $9.36 193-580-017 $9.36 193-580-018 $9.36 193-591-001 $9.36 193-591-002 $9.36 193-591-003 $9.36 193-592-001 $9.36 193-592-002 $9.36 193-592-003 $9.36 193-592-004 $9.36 193-592-007 $9.36 193-592-008 $9.36 193-592-009 $9.36 193-592-011 $9.36 193-592-012 $9.36 193-592-013 $9.36 193-592-014 $9.36 193-592-017 $9.36 193-600-001 $9.36 193-600-002 $9.36 193-600-003 $9.36 193-600-004 $9.36 193-600-008 $9.36 193-600-012 $9.36 193-600-013 $9.36 193-600-014 $9.36 193-611-003 $9.36 193-611-004 $9.36 193-611-005 $9.36 193-611-006 $9.36 193-611-007 $9.36 193-611-008 $9.36 193-611-009 $9.36 193-612-001 $9.36 193-612-002 $9.36 193-612-003 $9.36 193-612-004 $9.36 193-612-007 $9.36 48 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 633 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 36 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2852 MR LEVY CODE: Alamo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 193-612-008 $9.36 193-612-009 $9.36 193-612-010 $9.36 193-612-013 $9.36 193-612-014 $9.36 193-620-008 $9.36 193-631-001 $9.36 193-631-002 $9.36 193-631-003 $9.36 193-631-004 $9.36 193-632-001 $9.36 193-632-002 $9.36 193-632-003 $9.36 193-632-004 $9.36 193-632-005 $9.36 193-632-006 $9.36 193-632-007 $9.36 193-641-001 $9.36 193-641-002 $9.36 193-642-001 $9.36 193-642-002 $9.36 193-643-001 $9.36 193-643-002 $9.36 193-643-003 $9.36 193-643-004 $9.36 193-643-005 $9.36 193-643-006 $9.36 193-643-007 $9.36 193-650-002 $9.36 193-650-003 $9.36 193-650-004 $9.36 193-650-005 $9.36 193-650-006 $9.36 193-650-007 $9.36 193-650-008 $9.36 193-650-009 $9.36 193-650-010 $9.36 193-650-011 $9.36 193-650-012 $9.36 193-650-015 $9.36 193-650-016 $9.36 193-650-017 $9.36 193-650-018 $9.36 193-650-019 $9.36 193-650-020 $9.36 193-650-021 $9.36 193-650-022 $9.36 193-650-023 $9.36 193-650-024 $9.36 193-650-025 $9.36 193-650-026 $9.36 193-650-027 $9.36 193-650-028 $9.36 193-650-029 $9.36 193-650-030 $9.36 193-650-031 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 193-650-032 $9.36 193-650-033 $9.36 193-650-034 $9.36 193-650-035 $9.36 193-650-036 $9.36 193-650-037 $9.36 193-650-038 $9.36 193-650-039 $9.36 193-650-040 $9.36 193-650-041 $9.36 193-650-043 $9.36 193-650-044 $9.36 193-650-045 $9.36 193-650-046 $9.36 193-650-047 $9.36 193-650-048 $9.36 193-650-049 $9.36 193-650-050 $9.36 193-650-051 $9.36 193-650-052 $9.36 193-650-053 $9.36 193-650-054 $9.36 193-650-055 $9.36 193-660-001 $9.36 193-660-002 $9.36 193-660-003 $9.36 193-660-004 $9.36 193-660-005 $9.36 193-660-006 $9.36 193-660-007 $9.36 193-660-008 $9.36 193-660-009 $9.36 193-660-010 $9.36 193-660-011 $9.36 193-660-012 $9.36 193-660-013 $9.36 193-660-014 $9.36 193-660-015 $9.36 193-660-016 $9.36 193-660-017 $9.36 193-660-018 $9.36 193-660-020 $9.36 193-660-021 $9.36 193-660-022 $9.36 193-660-023 $9.36 193-660-024 $9.36 193-660-025 $9.36 193-660-026 $9.36 193-660-027 $9.36 193-660-028 $9.36 193-660-029 $9.36 193-660-032 $9.36 193-660-033 $9.36 193-660-034 $9.36 193-660-035 $9.36 193-660-036 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 193-660-037 $9.36 193-660-038 $9.36 193-660-039 $9.36 193-660-040 $9.36 193-660-041 $9.36 193-660-042 $9.36 193-660-043 $9.36 193-660-045 $9.36 193-660-046 $9.36 193-660-047 $9.36 193-660-048 $9.36 193-660-058 $9.36 193-660-059 $9.36 193-660-060 $9.36 193-660-061 $9.36 193-670-004 $9.36 193-670-009 $9.36 193-670-010 $9.36 193-670-011 $9.36 193-670-015 $9.36 193-670-016 $9.36 193-670-018 $9.36 193-670-019 $9.36 193-670-020 $9.36 193-680-001 $4.68 193-680-002 $4.68 193-680-003 $4.68 193-680-004 $9.36 193-680-005 $9.36 193-680-006 $9.36 193-680-007 $9.36 193-680-008 $4.68 193-680-009 $9.36 193-680-010 $9.36 193-680-011 $9.36 193-680-012 $9.36 193-680-013 $9.36 193-680-014 $4.68 193-680-017 $9.36 193-680-018 $9.36 193-680-019 $9.36 193-680-020 $9.36 193-680-021 $9.36 193-680-022 $9.36 193-680-023 $9.36 193-680-024 $9.36 193-680-025 $9.36 193-680-026 $9.36 193-680-027 $9.36 193-680-028 $4.68 193-680-029 $9.36 193-680-030 $9.36 193-680-031 $9.36 193-680-032 $4.68 193-680-033 $9.36 193-680-034 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 193-680-035 $9.36 193-680-036 $9.36 193-680-037 $9.36 193-680-038 $9.36 193-680-042 $9.36 193-680-043 $9.36 193-690-001 $9.36 193-690-005 $9.36 193-690-006 $9.36 193-690-007 $9.36 193-690-009 $9.36 193-690-010 $9.36 193-690-011 $9.36 193-690-012 $9.36 193-690-013 $9.36 193-690-014 $9.36 193-690-015 $9.36 193-690-016 $9.36 193-690-018 $9.36 193-690-019 $9.36 193-690-020 $9.36 193-690-021 $9.36 193-690-022 $9.36 193-690-024 $9.36 193-690-025 $9.36 193-690-026 $9.36 193-690-027 $9.36 193-690-028 $9.36 193-690-029 $9.36 193-690-031 $9.36 193-690-032 $9.36 193-690-033 $9.36 193-690-034 $9.36 193-690-035 $9.36 193-690-036 $9.36 193-690-037 $9.36 193-690-038 $9.36 193-690-039 $4.68 193-690-040 $9.36 193-690-041 $9.36 193-690-042 $9.36 193-690-043 $9.36 193-690-044 $9.36 193-690-045 $4.68 193-690-048 $9.36 193-690-049 $9.36 193-690-050 $9.36 193-690-052 $9.36 193-690-053 $9.36 193-690-059 $9.36 193-690-061 $9.36 193-690-062 $9.36 193-690-064 $9.36 193-690-066 $9.36 193-690-067 $9.36 193-690-068 $9.36 49 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 634 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 36 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2852 MR LEVY CODE: Alamo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 193-700-003 $9.36 193-700-004 $9.36 193-700-005 $9.36 193-700-006 $9.36 193-700-008 $9.36 193-700-009 $9.36 193-700-010 $9.36 193-700-011 $9.36 193-700-012 $9.36 193-700-013 $9.36 193-700-014 $9.36 193-700-015 $9.36 193-700-016 $9.36 193-700-017 $9.36 193-700-018 $9.36 193-700-019 $9.36 193-700-020 $9.36 193-700-021 $9.36 193-700-022 $9.36 193-700-023 $9.36 193-700-024 $9.36 193-700-025 $9.36 193-700-027 $9.36 193-700-028 $9.36 193-700-029 $9.36 193-700-030 $9.36 193-700-031 $9.36 193-700-032 $9.36 193-700-033 $9.36 193-700-034 $9.36 193-700-035 $9.36 193-700-036 $9.36 193-700-037 $9.36 193-700-042 $9.36 193-700-043 $9.36 193-700-044 $9.36 193-700-045 $4.68 193-700-046 $9.36 193-710-008 $9.36 193-710-009 $9.36 193-710-010 $9.36 193-710-011 $9.36 193-710-012 $9.36 193-710-013 $9.36 193-710-014 $9.36 193-710-015 $9.36 193-710-016 $9.36 193-710-018 $9.36 193-710-019 $4.68 193-710-020 $9.36 193-710-021 $9.36 193-710-022 $9.36 193-710-024 $9.36 193-710-027 $9.36 193-710-029 $9.36 193-710-032 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 193-710-034 $9.36 193-710-036 $9.36 193-710-038 $9.36 193-710-039 $4.68 193-710-040 $9.36 193-710-042 $9.36 193-710-044 $9.36 193-710-045 $9.36 193-710-046 $9.36 193-710-047 $9.36 193-720-001 $9.36 193-720-002 $9.36 193-720-003 $9.36 193-720-004 $9.36 193-720-005 $9.36 193-721-001 $9.36 193-721-002 $9.36 193-721-003 $9.36 193-721-004 $9.36 193-721-005 $9.36 193-722-001 $9.36 193-722-002 $9.36 193-722-003 $9.36 193-722-004 $9.36 193-722-005 $9.36 193-722-006 $9.36 193-722-007 $9.36 193-722-008 $9.36 193-722-009 $9.36 193-722-010 $9.36 193-722-011 $9.36 193-723-001 $9.36 193-723-002 $9.36 193-723-003 $9.36 193-723-004 $9.36 193-723-005 $9.36 193-723-006 $9.36 193-723-007 $9.36 193-723-008 $9.36 193-723-009 $9.36 193-723-010 $9.36 193-723-011 $9.36 193-723-012 $9.36 193-723-013 $9.36 193-723-014 $9.36 193-730-001 $9.36 193-730-002 $9.36 193-730-003 $9.36 193-730-004 $9.36 193-730-005 $9.36 193-730-006 $9.36 193-730-007 $9.36 193-730-008 $9.36 193-730-011 $9.36 193-730-012 $9.36 193-730-013 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 193-730-014 $9.36 193-730-015 $9.36 193-730-016 $9.36 193-730-017 $9.36 193-730-018 $9.36 193-730-019 $9.36 193-730-021 $9.36 193-730-022 $9.36 193-731-001 $9.36 193-731-002 $9.36 193-740-001 $9.36 193-740-002 $9.36 193-740-003 $9.36 193-740-004 $9.36 193-740-005 $9.36 193-740-007 $9.36 193-740-008 $9.36 193-740-009 $9.36 193-740-010 $9.36 193-740-011 $9.36 193-740-012 $9.36 193-740-014 $9.36 193-740-015 $9.36 193-740-016 $9.36 193-740-017 $9.36 193-740-018 $9.36 193-740-019 $9.36 193-740-020 $9.36 193-740-021 $9.36 193-740-022 $9.36 193-740-023 $9.36 193-740-024 $9.36 193-740-025 $9.36 193-740-026 $9.36 193-740-027 $9.36 193-741-001 $9.36 193-741-002 $9.36 193-741-003 $9.36 193-741-004 $9.36 193-741-005 $9.36 193-741-006 $9.36 193-750-004 $9.36 193-750-005 $9.36 193-750-006 $9.36 193-750-017 $9.36 193-750-018 $9.36 193-750-019 $9.36 193-750-020 $9.36 193-760-004 $9.36 193-760-005 $4.68 193-760-007 $9.36 193-760-009 $9.36 193-760-010 $9.36 193-770-001 $9.36 193-770-002 $9.36 193-770-010 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 193-770-011 $9.36 193-770-012 $9.36 193-770-013 $9.36 193-770-014 $9.36 193-781-001 $9.36 193-781-002 $9.36 193-781-003 $9.36 193-781-004 $9.36 193-781-005 $9.36 193-781-006 $9.36 193-781-007 $9.36 193-781-008 $9.36 193-781-009 $9.36 193-781-010 $9.36 193-781-011 $9.36 193-781-012 $9.36 193-781-013 $9.36 193-781-014 $9.36 193-781-015 $9.36 193-781-016 $9.36 193-781-017 $9.36 193-782-001 $9.36 193-783-001 $9.36 193-783-002 $9.36 193-783-003 $9.36 193-783-004 $9.36 193-783-005 $9.36 193-790-001 $9.36 193-790-002 $9.36 193-790-003 $9.36 193-790-004 $9.36 193-790-006 $9.36 193-790-007 $9.36 193-790-008 $9.36 193-790-009 $9.36 193-790-011 $9.36 193-801-001 $9.36 193-801-002 $9.36 193-801-003 $9.36 193-801-004 $9.36 193-801-005 $9.36 193-801-006 $9.36 193-801-007 $9.36 193-801-008 $9.36 193-801-009 $9.36 193-801-010 $9.36 193-801-011 $9.36 193-801-012 $9.36 193-801-013 $9.36 193-801-014 $9.36 193-801-015 $9.36 193-801-016 $9.36 193-801-017 $9.36 193-801-018 $9.36 193-801-019 $9.36 193-801-020 $9.36 50 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 635 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 36 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2852 MR LEVY CODE: Alamo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 193-801-021 $9.36 193-801-022 $9.36 193-801-023 $9.36 193-801-026 $9.36 193-801-027 $9.36 193-811-001 $9.36 193-811-002 $9.36 193-811-003 $9.36 193-811-004 $9.36 193-811-005 $9.36 193-811-006 $9.36 193-811-007 $9.36 193-811-008 $9.36 193-811-009 $9.36 193-811-025 $9.36 193-811-026 $9.36 193-811-027 $9.36 193-811-028 $9.36 193-811-035 $9.36 193-811-036 $9.36 193-811-037 $9.36 193-811-038 $9.36 193-811-039 $9.36 193-811-040 $9.36 193-811-041 $9.36 193-811-042 $9.36 193-811-043 $9.36 193-811-044 $9.36 193-811-045 $9.36 193-811-046 $9.36 193-811-047 $9.36 193-811-048 $9.36 193-811-049 $9.36 193-811-050 $9.36 193-811-051 $9.36 193-811-052 $9.36 193-811-053 $9.36 193-811-054 $9.36 193-812-012 $9.36 193-812-013 $9.36 193-812-014 $9.36 193-812-015 $9.36 193-812-016 $9.36 193-812-017 $9.36 193-812-018 $9.36 193-812-019 $9.36 193-812-020 $9.36 193-812-021 $9.36 193-820-002 $9.36 193-820-003 $9.36 193-820-004 $9.36 193-820-005 $9.36 193-820-015 $9.36 193-820-016 $9.36 193-820-017 $9.36 193-820-018 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 193-820-019 $9.36 193-820-020 $9.36 193-820-021 $9.36 193-820-022 $9.36 193-840-001 $9.36 193-840-002 $9.36 193-840-003 $9.36 193-840-004 $9.36 193-840-005 $9.36 193-840-006 $9.36 193-840-007 $9.36 193-840-010 $9.36 193-840-011 $9.36 193-840-012 $9.36 193-840-013 $9.36 193-840-014 $9.36 193-840-015 $9.36 193-840-016 $9.36 193-840-017 $9.36 193-840-018 $9.36 193-840-019 $9.36 193-840-020 $9.36 193-840-021 $9.36 193-840-022 $9.36 193-840-023 $9.36 193-840-024 $9.36 193-840-025 $9.36 193-840-026 $9.36 193-840-027 $9.36 193-850-001 $9.36 193-850-002 $9.36 193-850-004 $9.36 193-850-005 $9.36 193-850-006 $9.36 193-850-007 $9.36 193-850-008 $9.36 193-850-010 $9.36 193-850-011 $9.36 193-850-012 $9.36 193-850-013 $9.36 193-850-014 $9.36 193-850-015 $9.36 193-850-016 $9.36 193-850-017 $9.36 193-861-001 $9.36 193-861-002 $9.36 193-861-003 $9.36 193-861-004 $4.68 193-861-005 $9.36 193-861-006 $9.36 193-861-007 $9.36 193-861-008 $9.36 193-861-009 $9.36 193-861-010 $9.36 193-861-011 $9.36 193-861-012 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 193-861-013 $9.36 193-861-014 $9.36 193-861-015 $9.36 193-861-016 $9.36 193-861-017 $9.36 193-861-018 $9.36 193-861-019 $9.36 193-861-020 $9.36 193-870-001 $9.36 193-870-002 $9.36 193-870-003 $9.36 193-870-004 $9.36 193-870-005 $9.36 193-870-006 $9.36 193-880-001 $9.36 193-880-002 $9.36 193-880-003 $9.36 193-880-004 $9.36 193-880-005 $9.36 193-880-006 $9.36 193-880-008 $9.36 193-880-009 $9.36 193-880-010 $9.36 193-880-011 $9.36 193-890-001 $9.36 193-890-002 $9.36 193-890-003 $9.36 193-890-004 $9.36 193-890-005 $9.36 193-890-006 $9.36 193-890-007 $9.36 193-890-008 $9.36 193-890-009 $9.36 193-890-010 $9.36 193-890-011 $9.36 193-890-012 $9.36 193-890-013 $9.36 193-890-014 $9.36 193-890-015 $9.36 193-890-016 $9.36 193-890-018 $9.36 193-890-021 $9.36 193-890-022 $9.36 193-890-023 $9.36 193-890-024 $9.36 193-890-025 $9.36 193-890-026 $9.36 193-890-027 $9.36 193-890-028 $9.36 193-890-029 $9.36 193-890-030 $9.36 193-890-032 $9.36 193-890-034 $9.36 193-900-001 $9.36 193-900-002 $9.36 193-900-003 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 193-900-004 $9.36 193-900-005 $9.36 193-900-006 $9.36 193-900-007 $9.36 193-900-008 $9.36 193-900-009 $9.36 193-900-013 $9.36 193-900-015 $9.36 193-910-001 $9.36 193-910-002 $9.36 193-910-003 $9.36 193-910-004 $9.36 193-910-005 $9.36 193-910-006 $9.36 193-920-001 $9.36 193-920-002 $9.36 193-920-003 $9.36 193-920-004 $9.36 193-920-005 $9.36 193-920-006 $9.36 193-920-007 $9.36 193-920-008 $9.36 193-920-009 $9.36 193-920-010 $9.36 193-920-011 $9.36 193-920-012 $9.36 193-920-013 $9.36 193-920-014 $9.36 193-920-015 $9.36 193-920-016 $9.36 193-920-017 $9.36 193-920-018 $9.36 193-920-019 $9.36 193-920-020 $9.36 193-920-021 $9.36 193-920-022 $9.36 193-920-023 $9.36 193-920-024 $9.36 193-920-025 $9.36 193-920-026 $9.36 193-920-027 $9.36 193-920-028 $9.36 193-920-029 $9.36 193-920-030 $9.36 193-920-031 $9.36 193-920-032 $9.36 193-920-033 $9.36 193-920-034 $9.36 193-920-035 $9.36 193-920-036 $9.36 193-920-037 $9.36 193-920-038 $9.36 193-920-039 $9.36 193-920-040 $9.36 193-920-041 $9.36 193-920-042 $9.36 51 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 636 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 36 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2852 MR LEVY CODE: Alamo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 193-920-043 $9.36 193-920-044 $9.36 193-920-045 $9.36 193-920-046 $9.36 193-920-047 $9.36 194-070-015 $9.36 194-070-016 $9.36 194-070-018 $9.36 194-070-074 $9.36 194-070-075 $9.36 194-070-078 $9.36 194-070-079 $9.36 194-070-082 $9.36 194-070-083 $9.36 194-070-084 $9.36 194-070-086 $9.36 194-070-087 $9.36 194-100-001 $9.36 194-100-005 $9.36 194-100-006 $9.36 194-100-007 $9.36 194-101-001 $9.36 194-101-002 $9.36 194-101-003 $9.36 194-101-004 $9.36 194-101-005 $9.36 194-101-006 $9.36 194-110-003 $9.36 194-110-004 $9.36 194-110-005 $9.36 194-110-006 $9.36 194-110-007 $9.36 194-110-008 $9.36 194-110-009 $9.36 194-110-010 $9.36 194-110-011 $9.36 194-110-017 $9.36 194-110-019 $9.36 194-110-020 $9.36 194-110-021 $9.36 194-110-022 $9.36 194-121-002 $9.36 194-121-003 $9.36 194-121-004 $9.36 194-121-005 $9.36 194-121-006 $9.36 194-121-007 $9.36 194-121-009 $9.36 194-121-011 $9.36 194-121-012 $9.36 194-121-014 $9.36 194-122-002 $9.36 194-122-003 $9.36 194-122-004 $9.36 194-122-005 $9.36 194-122-006 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 194-122-007 $9.36 194-122-008 $9.36 194-122-009 $9.36 194-123-001 $9.36 194-123-002 $9.36 194-123-003 $9.36 194-123-004 $9.36 194-123-005 $9.36 194-123-008 $9.36 194-123-009 $9.36 194-123-010 $9.36 194-123-011 $9.36 194-123-012 $9.36 194-123-013 $9.36 194-123-014 $9.36 194-123-015 $9.36 194-123-016 $9.36 194-131-001 $9.36 194-131-002 $9.36 194-131-003 $9.36 194-131-004 $9.36 194-131-005 $9.36 194-131-009 $9.36 194-131-010 $9.36 194-131-012 $9.36 194-131-014 $9.36 194-132-001 $9.36 194-132-002 $9.36 194-133-001 $9.36 194-133-002 $9.36 194-133-003 $9.36 194-133-004 $9.36 194-133-005 $9.36 194-133-006 $9.36 194-133-007 $9.36 194-133-008 $9.36 194-133-009 $9.36 194-133-010 $9.36 194-133-011 $9.36 194-133-012 $9.36 194-133-013 $9.36 194-133-014 $9.36 194-133-015 $9.36 194-133-016 $9.36 194-133-017 $9.36 194-133-018 $9.36 194-140-001 $9.36 194-140-002 $9.36 194-140-003 $9.36 194-140-004 $9.36 194-140-005 $9.36 194-140-006 $9.36 194-140-007 $9.36 194-140-008 $9.36 194-140-009 $9.36 194-140-010 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 194-140-011 $9.36 194-140-012 $9.36 194-140-013 $9.36 194-140-014 $9.36 194-151-001 $9.36 194-151-002 $9.36 194-151-003 $9.36 194-151-004 $9.36 194-151-005 $9.36 194-151-006 $9.36 194-151-007 $9.36 194-151-008 $9.36 194-151-009 $9.36 194-151-010 $9.36 194-151-011 $9.36 194-151-012 $9.36 194-151-013 $9.36 194-152-001 $9.36 194-152-002 $9.36 194-152-003 $9.36 194-152-004 $9.36 194-152-005 $9.36 194-152-006 $9.36 194-152-008 $9.36 194-160-001 $9.36 194-160-002 $9.36 194-160-003 $9.36 194-160-004 $9.36 194-160-005 $9.36 194-160-006 $9.36 194-160-007 $9.36 194-160-008 $9.36 194-160-009 $9.36 194-160-010 $9.36 194-160-011 $9.36 194-160-012 $9.36 194-160-013 $9.36 194-160-014 $9.36 194-160-015 $9.36 194-160-016 $9.36 194-160-017 $9.36 194-160-018 $9.36 194-160-019 $9.36 194-160-020 $9.36 194-160-021 $9.36 194-160-022 $9.36 194-170-001 $9.36 194-170-002 $9.36 194-170-003 $9.36 194-170-004 $9.36 194-170-005 $9.36 194-170-006 $9.36 194-170-007 $9.36 194-170-008 $9.36 194-170-009 $9.36 194-170-010 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 194-170-015 $9.36 194-170-016 $9.36 194-170-017 $9.36 194-170-018 $9.36 194-170-019 $9.36 194-170-020 $9.36 194-170-022 $9.36 194-170-023 $9.36 194-170-025 $9.36 194-170-026 $9.36 194-190-001 $9.36 194-190-002 $9.36 194-190-003 $9.36 194-190-005 $9.36 194-190-006 $9.36 194-190-007 $9.36 194-190-008 $9.36 194-190-009 $9.36 194-190-010 $9.36 194-190-011 $9.36 194-190-012 $9.36 194-190-013 $9.36 194-190-014 $9.36 194-190-015 $9.36 194-190-016 $9.36 194-190-017 $9.36 194-190-019 $9.36 194-201-001 $9.36 194-201-002 $9.36 194-201-003 $9.36 194-202-001 $9.36 194-202-002 $9.36 194-202-003 $9.36 194-202-004 $9.36 194-202-005 $9.36 194-202-006 $9.36 194-202-007 $9.36 194-202-008 $9.36 194-202-009 $9.36 194-211-001 $9.36 194-211-002 $9.36 194-211-003 $9.36 194-211-004 $9.36 194-211-005 $9.36 194-211-006 $9.36 194-211-007 $9.36 194-211-008 $9.36 194-211-009 $9.36 194-211-010 $9.36 194-211-011 $9.36 194-211-012 $9.36 194-212-001 $9.36 194-212-002 $9.36 194-212-003 $9.36 194-212-004 $9.36 194-212-005 $9.36 52 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 637 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 36 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2852 MR LEVY CODE: Alamo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 194-212-006 $9.36 194-212-007 $9.36 194-212-008 $9.36 194-213-001 $9.36 194-213-004 $9.36 194-213-005 $9.36 194-213-007 $9.36 194-213-008 $9.36 194-221-001 $9.36 194-221-002 $9.36 194-221-003 $9.36 194-221-004 $9.36 194-221-005 $9.36 194-221-006 $9.36 194-221-007 $9.36 194-221-010 $9.36 194-221-011 $9.36 194-221-015 $9.36 194-221-016 $9.36 194-222-003 $9.36 194-222-004 $9.36 194-222-005 $9.36 194-222-006 $9.36 194-222-007 $9.36 194-222-008 $9.36 194-222-009 $9.36 194-222-010 $9.36 194-222-011 $9.36 194-222-012 $9.36 194-222-013 $9.36 194-222-014 $9.36 194-222-015 $9.36 194-222-016 $9.36 194-231-001 $9.36 194-231-002 $9.36 194-231-004 $9.36 194-231-006 $9.36 194-231-007 $9.36 194-231-008 $9.36 194-231-010 $9.36 194-231-011 $9.36 194-232-001 $9.36 194-232-002 $9.36 194-232-003 $9.36 194-232-004 $9.36 194-232-005 $9.36 194-232-006 $9.36 194-232-007 $9.36 194-232-008 $9.36 194-232-009 $9.36 194-232-010 $9.36 194-232-011 $9.36 194-232-012 $9.36 194-232-013 $9.36 194-232-014 $9.36 194-232-015 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 194-232-016 $9.36 195-400-001 $9.36 195-400-002 $9.36 195-400-003 $9.36 195-400-004 $9.36 195-400-005 $9.36 195-400-006 $9.36 195-400-007 $9.36 195-400-008 $9.36 195-400-009 $9.36 195-400-010 $9.36 195-410-001 $9.36 195-410-002 $9.36 195-410-003 $9.36 195-410-004 $9.36 195-410-005 $9.36 195-410-006 $9.36 195-410-010 $9.36 195-410-011 $9.36 195-410-012 $9.36 195-410-013 $9.36 195-410-015 $9.36 195-410-016 $9.36 196-010-008 $9.36 196-010-009 $9.36 196-010-010 $9.36 196-010-011 $9.36 196-010-012 $9.36 196-010-014 $9.36 196-010-015 $9.36 196-010-016 $9.36 196-010-017 $9.36 196-010-018 $9.36 196-010-019 $9.36 196-010-020 $9.36 196-010-022 $9.36 196-010-025 $9.36 196-010-028 $9.36 196-010-031 $9.36 196-010-032 $9.36 196-010-033 $9.36 196-010-034 $9.36 196-010-035 $9.36 196-010-036 $9.36 196-010-037 $9.36 196-010-038 $9.36 196-010-039 $9.36 196-010-040 $9.36 196-010-041 $9.36 196-010-042 $9.36 196-010-043 $9.36 196-010-044 $9.36 196-020-004 $9.36 196-020-005 $9.36 196-020-006 $9.36 196-020-007 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 196-031-003 $9.36 196-031-006 $9.36 196-031-007 $9.36 196-031-009 $9.36 196-032-006 $9.36 196-032-009 $9.36 196-032-012 $9.36 196-032-013 $9.36 196-032-014 $9.36 196-032-015 $9.36 196-032-016 $9.36 196-032-017 $9.36 196-032-018 $9.36 196-041-007 $9.36 196-041-008 $9.36 196-041-009 $9.36 196-041-010 $9.36 196-041-011 $9.36 196-041-012 $9.36 196-042-002 $9.36 196-042-003 $9.36 196-042-005 $9.36 196-042-006 $9.36 196-042-007 $9.36 196-042-008 $9.36 196-042-009 $9.36 196-050-009 $9.36 196-050-010 $9.36 196-050-012 $9.36 196-050-014 $9.36 196-050-015 $9.36 196-050-017 $9.36 196-050-018 $9.36 196-061-003 $9.36 196-061-004 $9.36 196-061-005 $9.36 196-061-006 $9.36 196-061-012 $9.36 196-061-013 $9.36 196-061-014 $9.36 196-061-015 $9.36 196-062-001 $9.36 196-062-002 $9.36 196-062-005 $9.36 196-062-006 $9.36 196-062-007 $9.36 196-070-004 $9.36 196-070-007 $9.36 196-070-008 $9.36 196-070-009 $9.36 196-070-010 $9.36 196-070-011 $9.36 196-070-012 $9.36 196-070-015 $9.36 196-070-016 $9.36 196-070-017 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 196-070-018 $9.36 196-070-019 $9.36 196-080-002 $9.36 196-080-022 $9.36 196-080-023 $9.36 196-080-024 $9.36 196-080-025 $9.36 196-080-032 $9.36 196-080-036 $9.36 196-080-038 $9.36 196-080-040 $9.36 196-091-006 $9.36 196-091-007 $9.36 196-091-013 $9.36 196-091-014 $9.36 196-092-003 $9.36 196-092-004 $9.36 196-092-005 $9.36 196-092-006 $9.36 196-100-001 $9.36 196-100-002 $9.36 196-100-003 $9.36 196-100-004 $9.36 196-100-005 $9.36 196-100-006 $9.36 196-100-007 $9.36 196-100-008 $9.36 196-100-011 $9.36 196-100-012 $9.36 196-100-017 $9.36 196-100-019 $9.36 196-100-020 $9.36 196-110-007 $9.36 196-110-027 $9.36 196-110-028 $9.36 196-110-029 $9.36 196-110-030 $9.36 196-110-039 $9.36 196-110-041 $9.36 196-110-042 $9.36 196-110-043 $9.36 196-110-044 $9.36 196-110-046 $9.36 196-110-048 $9.36 196-110-049 $9.36 196-120-005 $9.36 196-120-008 $9.36 196-120-009 $9.36 196-120-010 $9.36 196-120-013 $9.36 196-120-014 $9.36 196-120-015 $9.36 196-120-016 $9.36 196-120-017 $9.36 196-120-018 $9.36 196-120-019 $9.36 53 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 638 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 36 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2852 MR LEVY CODE: Alamo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 196-120-020 $9.36 196-130-005 $9.36 196-130-006 $9.36 196-130-007 $9.36 196-130-008 $9.36 196-130-014 $9.36 196-130-017 $9.36 196-130-020 $9.36 196-130-022 $9.36 196-130-023 $9.36 196-130-026 $9.36 196-130-027 $9.36 196-130-030 $9.36 196-130-032 $9.36 196-130-039 $9.36 196-130-040 $9.36 196-130-041 $9.36 196-130-042 $9.36 196-130-043 $9.36 196-510-002 $9.36 196-510-003 $9.36 196-510-004 $9.36 196-510-005 $9.36 196-510-006 $9.36 196-510-007 $9.36 196-510-010 $9.36 196-510-013 $9.36 196-510-014 $9.36 197-010-007 $9.36 197-010-008 $9.36 197-010-013 $18.72 197-010-014 $18.72 197-010-016 $18.72 197-010-019 $9.36 197-010-025 $102.96 197-010-026 $9.36 197-010-027 $9.36 197-010-028 $9.36 197-010-029 $4.68 197-020-017 $9.36 197-020-023 $9.36 197-020-024 $9.36 197-020-025 $9.36 197-030-001 $9.36 197-030-025 $9.36 197-040-004 $9.36 197-040-007 $9.36 197-040-011 $9.36 197-040-012 $9.36 197-040-015 $9.36 197-040-017 $9.36 197-040-018 $9.36 197-040-020 $9.36 197-040-021 $9.36 197-040-022 $9.36 197-040-023 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 197-040-024 $9.36 197-040-025 $9.36 197-040-026 $9.36 197-040-027 $9.36 197-040-028 $9.36 197-040-029 $9.36 197-040-030 $9.36 197-040-031 $9.36 197-040-032 $9.36 197-040-033 $9.36 197-040-034 $9.36 197-040-035 $9.36 197-040-036 $9.36 197-040-037 $9.36 197-050-007 $9.36 197-050-013 $9.36 197-050-014 $9.36 197-050-015 $9.36 197-050-016 $9.36 197-050-021 $9.36 197-050-022 $9.36 197-050-023 $9.36 197-050-025 $9.36 197-050-026 $4.68 197-050-027 $9.36 197-050-029 $9.36 197-060-002 $9.36 197-060-003 $9.36 197-060-004 $9.36 197-060-005 $9.36 197-060-006 $9.36 197-060-007 $9.36 197-060-008 $9.36 197-060-009 $9.36 197-060-010 $9.36 197-060-011 $9.36 197-060-012 $9.36 197-060-013 $9.36 197-060-014 $9.36 197-060-015 $9.36 197-060-016 $9.36 197-060-017 $9.36 197-060-018 $9.36 197-060-019 $9.36 197-060-020 $9.36 197-060-021 $9.36 197-060-022 $9.36 197-060-023 $9.36 197-060-024 $9.36 197-060-025 $9.36 197-060-026 $9.36 197-060-027 $9.36 197-060-029 $9.36 197-060-030 $9.36 197-060-031 $9.36 197-060-032 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 197-060-033 $9.36 197-070-001 $9.36 197-070-002 $9.36 197-070-005 $9.36 197-070-012 $9.36 197-070-013 $9.36 197-070-014 $9.36 197-070-017 $9.36 197-070-018 $9.36 197-070-019 $9.36 197-070-020 $9.36 197-070-021 $9.36 197-070-022 $9.36 197-070-023 $9.36 197-070-024 $9.36 197-090-006 $9.36 197-090-007 $9.36 197-090-008 $9.36 197-090-012 $9.36 197-090-013 $9.36 197-090-014 $9.36 197-090-020 $9.36 197-090-021 $9.36 197-190-013 $9.36 197-190-014 $9.36 197-190-015 $9.36 197-190-016 $9.36 197-190-022 $9.36 197-190-034 $9.36 197-190-036 $9.36 197-190-037 $9.36 197-190-039 $9.36 197-190-041 $9.36 197-190-042 $9.36 197-200-006 $9.36 197-200-007 $9.36 197-200-008 $9.36 197-200-009 $9.36 197-200-010 $9.36 197-200-011 $9.36 197-200-012 $9.36 197-200-013 $9.36 197-200-014 $9.36 197-200-015 $9.36 197-200-016 $9.36 197-200-017 $9.36 197-200-018 $9.36 197-200-019 $9.36 197-200-022 $9.36 197-200-023 $9.36 197-200-025 $9.36 197-200-026 $9.36 197-200-027 $9.36 197-201-001 $9.36 197-201-002 $9.36 197-201-003 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 197-220-002 $9.36 197-220-003 $9.36 197-220-004 $9.36 197-220-005 $9.36 197-220-011 $9.36 197-220-015 $9.36 197-220-017 $9.36 197-220-018 $9.36 197-230-001 $9.36 197-230-002 $9.36 197-230-003 $9.36 197-230-004 $9.36 197-230-005 $9.36 197-230-006 $9.36 197-230-007 $9.36 197-230-008 $9.36 197-230-009 $9.36 197-230-010 $9.36 197-230-011 $9.36 197-230-012 $9.36 197-230-013 $9.36 197-230-014 $9.36 197-230-015 $9.36 197-230-016 $9.36 197-230-017 $9.36 197-230-018 $9.36 197-270-001 $9.36 197-270-011 $9.36 197-270-012 $9.36 197-270-018 $9.36 197-270-019 $9.36 197-270-021 $9.36 197-270-022 $9.36 197-270-023 $9.36 197-270-024 $9.36 197-281-001 $9.36 197-281-002 $9.36 197-281-007 $9.36 197-281-008 $9.36 197-281-009 $9.36 197-281-010 $9.36 197-281-011 $9.36 197-281-012 $9.36 197-281-013 $9.36 197-282-001 $9.36 197-282-002 $9.36 197-282-003 $9.36 197-282-004 $9.36 197-282-006 $9.36 197-282-007 $9.36 197-283-001 $9.36 197-290-003 $9.36 197-290-007 $9.36 197-290-009 $9.36 197-290-012 $9.36 197-290-015 $9.36 54 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 639 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 36 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2852 MR LEVY CODE: Alamo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 197-290-017 $9.36 197-290-018 $9.36 197-290-028 $9.36 197-290-030 $9.36 197-290-031 $9.36 197-290-034 $9.36 197-290-035 $9.36 197-290-038 $9.36 197-290-043 $9.36 197-290-044 $9.36 197-290-047 $9.36 197-290-048 $9.36 197-290-050 $9.36 197-290-051 $9.36 197-290-052 $9.36 197-301-001 $9.36 197-301-002 $9.36 197-301-003 $9.36 197-301-004 $9.36 197-301-005 $9.36 197-301-011 $9.36 197-301-012 $9.36 197-301-013 $9.36 197-302-002 $9.36 197-302-003 $9.36 197-302-004 $9.36 197-302-005 $9.36 197-302-006 $9.36 197-302-007 $9.36 197-302-008 $9.36 197-302-009 $9.36 197-302-010 $9.36 197-302-011 $9.36 197-302-012 $9.36 197-302-014 $9.36 197-302-015 $9.36 197-303-001 $9.36 197-303-002 $9.36 197-303-003 $9.36 197-303-004 $9.36 197-303-005 $9.36 197-303-006 $9.36 197-303-007 $9.36 197-310-001 $4.68 197-310-002 $4.68 197-310-003 $4.68 197-310-004 $4.68 197-310-005 $4.68 197-310-006 $4.68 197-310-007 $4.68 197-310-008 $4.68 197-310-009 $4.68 197-310-010 $4.68 197-310-011 $4.68 197-310-012 $4.68 197-310-013 $4.68 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 197-310-014 $4.68 197-310-015 $4.68 197-310-016 $4.68 197-310-017 $4.68 197-310-018 $4.68 197-310-019 $4.68 197-310-020 $4.68 197-310-021 $4.68 197-310-022 $4.68 197-310-023 $4.68 197-310-024 $4.68 197-310-025 $4.68 197-310-026 $4.68 197-310-027 $4.68 197-310-028 $4.68 197-310-029 $4.68 197-310-030 $4.68 197-310-031 $4.68 197-310-032 $4.68 197-310-033 $4.68 197-310-034 $4.68 197-310-035 $4.68 197-310-036 $4.68 197-310-037 $4.68 197-310-038 $4.68 197-310-039 $4.68 197-310-040 $4.68 197-310-041 $4.68 197-310-042 $4.68 197-310-043 $4.68 197-310-044 $4.68 197-310-045 $4.68 197-310-046 $4.68 197-310-047 $4.68 197-310-048 $4.68 197-310-049 $4.68 197-310-050 $4.68 197-310-051 $4.68 197-310-052 $4.68 197-310-053 $4.68 197-310-054 $4.68 197-310-055 $4.68 197-320-001 $4.68 197-320-002 $4.68 197-320-003 $4.68 197-320-004 $4.68 197-320-005 $4.68 197-320-006 $4.68 197-320-007 $4.68 197-320-008 $4.68 197-320-009 $4.68 197-320-010 $4.68 197-320-011 $4.68 197-320-012 $4.68 197-320-013 $4.68 197-320-014 $4.68 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 197-320-015 $4.68 197-320-016 $4.68 197-320-017 $4.68 197-320-018 $4.68 197-320-019 $4.68 197-320-020 $4.68 197-320-021 $4.68 197-320-022 $4.68 197-320-023 $4.68 197-320-024 $4.68 197-320-025 $4.68 197-320-026 $4.68 197-320-027 $4.68 197-320-028 $4.68 197-320-029 $4.68 197-320-030 $4.68 197-320-031 $4.68 197-320-032 $4.68 197-330-001 $4.68 197-330-002 $4.68 197-330-003 $4.68 197-330-004 $4.68 197-330-005 $4.68 197-330-006 $4.68 197-330-007 $4.68 197-330-008 $4.68 197-330-009 $4.68 197-340-001 $9.36 197-340-002 $9.36 197-340-003 $9.36 197-340-004 $9.36 197-340-005 $9.36 197-340-006 $9.36 197-340-007 $9.36 197-340-008 $9.36 197-350-002 $9.36 197-350-003 $9.36 197-350-004 $9.36 197-350-008 $9.36 197-350-010 $9.36 197-350-011 $9.36 197-350-012 $9.36 197-350-013 $9.36 197-350-014 $9.36 197-350-015 $9.36 197-350-018 $9.36 197-350-019 $9.36 197-350-020 $9.36 197-350-021 $9.36 197-350-022 $9.36 197-350-027 $9.36 197-350-028 $9.36 197-350-030 $9.36 197-350-031 $9.36 197-350-032 $9.36 197-360-004 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 197-360-010 $9.36 197-360-011 $9.36 197-360-013 $9.36 197-360-015 $9.36 197-360-019 $9.36 197-360-020 $9.36 197-360-025 $9.36 197-360-026 $9.36 197-360-028 $9.36 197-360-029 $9.36 197-360-030 $9.36 197-360-031 $9.36 197-371-005 $9.36 197-371-006 $9.36 197-371-007 $9.36 197-371-009 $9.36 197-371-011 $9.36 197-371-012 $9.36 197-371-014 $9.36 197-380-019 $9.36 197-380-029 $9.36 197-380-037 $9.36 197-380-039 $9.36 197-380-040 $9.36 197-380-041 $9.36 197-380-042 $9.36 197-380-043 $9.36 197-380-046 $9.36 197-380-049 $9.36 197-380-052 $9.36 197-380-053 $9.36 197-380-054 $9.36 197-390-001 $9.36 197-390-002 $9.36 197-390-003 $9.36 197-390-004 $9.36 197-390-005 $9.36 197-390-006 $9.36 197-390-007 $9.36 197-390-008 $9.36 197-390-011 $9.36 197-390-012 $9.36 197-390-013 $9.36 197-390-014 $9.36 197-390-015 $9.36 197-390-016 $9.36 197-390-017 $9.36 197-390-018 $9.36 197-390-020 $9.36 197-400-001 $9.36 197-400-002 $9.36 197-400-003 $9.36 197-400-004 $9.36 197-400-007 $9.36 197-400-008 $9.36 197-400-009 $4.68 55 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 640 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 36 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2852 MR LEVY CODE: Alamo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 197-400-010 $9.36 197-400-011 $9.36 197-400-012 $9.36 197-400-013 $9.36 197-400-014 $9.36 197-410-001 $4.68 197-410-002 $4.68 197-410-003 $4.68 197-410-004 $4.68 197-410-005 $4.68 197-410-006 $4.68 197-410-007 $4.68 197-410-008 $4.68 197-410-009 $4.68 197-410-010 $4.68 197-410-011 $4.68 197-410-012 $4.68 197-420-006 $4.68 197-420-007 $4.68 197-420-008 $4.68 197-420-009 $4.68 197-420-010 $4.68 197-420-011 $4.68 197-420-012 $4.68 197-420-013 $4.68 197-420-014 $4.68 197-420-015 $4.68 197-420-016 $4.68 197-420-017 $4.68 197-420-018 $4.68 197-420-019 $4.68 197-420-020 $4.68 197-420-021 $4.68 197-420-022 $4.68 197-420-023 $4.68 197-420-024 $4.68 197-420-025 $4.68 197-420-026 $4.68 197-420-027 $4.68 197-420-028 $4.68 197-420-029 $4.68 197-420-030 $4.68 197-420-031 $4.68 197-420-032 $4.68 197-420-033 $4.68 197-420-034 $4.68 197-420-035 $4.68 197-440-005 $9.36 197-440-006 $9.36 197-440-007 $9.36 197-440-008 $9.36 197-440-009 $9.36 197-440-010 $9.36 197-440-011 $9.36 197-440-012 $9.36 197-440-013 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 197-440-014 $9.36 197-440-015 $9.36 197-440-016 $9.36 197-440-017 $9.36 197-440-018 $9.36 197-440-019 $9.36 197-450-001 $4.68 197-450-002 $4.68 197-450-003 $9.36 197-450-004 $9.36 197-450-005 $9.36 197-450-006 $9.36 197-450-007 $9.36 197-450-008 $9.36 197-450-009 $9.36 197-450-010 $9.36 197-450-011 $9.36 197-450-012 $9.36 197-450-013 $9.36 197-450-014 $9.36 197-450-015 $9.36 197-450-016 $9.36 197-460-008 $9.36 197-460-009 $9.36 197-460-010 $9.36 197-460-011 $9.36 197-460-012 $9.36 197-460-013 $9.36 197-460-014 $9.36 197-460-015 $9.36 197-460-016 $9.36 197-460-017 $9.36 197-470-001 $9.36 197-470-002 $9.36 197-470-003 $9.36 197-470-004 $9.36 197-470-005 $9.36 197-470-006 $9.36 197-470-007 $9.36 197-470-008 $9.36 197-470-009 $9.36 197-470-010 $9.36 197-470-011 $9.36 197-470-012 $9.36 197-470-013 $9.36 197-470-014 $9.36 197-470-015 $9.36 197-470-016 $9.36 197-470-017 $9.36 197-470-018 $9.36 197-470-019 $9.36 197-470-021 $9.36 197-470-031 $9.36 197-480-001 $9.36 197-480-002 $9.36 197-480-003 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 197-480-004 $9.36 197-480-005 $9.36 198-010-013 $9.36 198-010-016 $9.36 198-010-019 $17.32 198-010-020 $21.72 198-020-003 $9.36 198-020-008 $9.36 198-020-009 $9.36 198-020-010 $9.36 198-020-011 $9.36 198-020-012 $9.36 198-020-018 $9.36 198-020-019 $9.36 198-020-020 $9.36 198-020-021 $9.36 198-020-024 $9.36 198-020-030 $9.36 198-020-032 $9.36 198-020-033 $9.36 198-020-034 $9.36 198-020-035 $9.36 198-020-039 $9.36 198-020-040 $9.36 198-020-041 $9.36 198-020-042 $9.36 198-020-043 $9.36 198-020-044 $9.36 198-020-045 $9.36 198-020-046 $9.36 198-020-047 $9.36 198-020-048 $9.36 198-020-052 $9.36 198-020-053 $9.36 198-020-054 $9.36 198-020-055 $9.36 198-020-059 $9.36 198-020-060 $9.36 198-030-004 $9.36 198-030-006 $9.36 198-030-007 $9.36 198-030-008 $9.36 198-030-009 $9.36 198-030-010 $9.36 198-030-011 $9.36 198-030-012 $9.36 198-030-013 $9.36 198-030-014 $9.36 198-030-015 $9.36 198-030-018 $9.36 198-030-019 $9.36 198-030-020 $9.36 198-030-021 $9.36 198-030-022 $9.36 198-030-023 $9.36 198-030-030 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 198-030-032 $9.36 198-030-033 $9.36 198-030-034 $9.36 198-030-035 $9.36 198-040-002 $9.36 198-040-003 $9.36 198-040-004 $9.36 198-040-005 $9.36 198-040-007 $9.36 198-040-008 $9.36 198-040-009 $9.36 198-040-017 $9.36 198-040-018 $9.36 198-040-019 $9.36 198-040-020 $9.36 198-040-023 $9.36 198-040-024 $9.36 198-040-026 $9.36 198-040-027 $9.36 198-040-028 $9.36 198-040-029 $9.36 198-040-030 $9.36 198-040-031 $9.36 198-040-032 $9.36 198-040-033 $9.36 198-040-034 $9.36 198-040-035 $9.36 198-040-036 $9.36 198-040-037 $9.36 198-050-006 $9.36 198-050-007 $9.36 198-050-010 $9.36 198-050-011 $9.36 198-050-012 $9.36 198-050-013 $9.36 198-050-014 $9.36 198-050-015 $9.36 198-050-016 $9.36 198-050-017 $9.36 198-050-018 $9.36 198-050-019 $9.36 198-050-020 $9.36 198-050-021 $9.36 198-050-022 $9.36 198-050-025 $9.36 198-050-026 $9.36 198-050-027 $9.36 198-050-028 $9.36 198-050-029 $9.36 198-050-030 $9.36 198-050-031 $9.36 198-050-032 $9.36 198-050-033 $9.36 198-050-034 $9.36 198-050-035 $9.36 198-050-036 $9.36 56 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 641 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 36 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2852 MR LEVY CODE: Alamo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 198-050-037 $9.36 198-050-038 $9.36 198-050-039 $9.36 198-050-040 $9.36 198-050-041 $9.36 198-050-042 $9.36 198-050-043 $9.36 198-050-044 $9.36 198-050-045 $9.36 198-050-046 $9.36 198-050-047 $9.36 198-050-048 $9.36 198-050-049 $9.36 198-050-050 $9.36 198-061-004 $28.08 198-061-008 $9.36 198-061-009 $9.36 198-061-011 $9.36 198-061-012 $10.38 198-061-016 $9.36 198-062-002 $9.36 198-062-003 $9.36 198-062-004 $9.36 198-062-005 $9.36 198-062-006 $9.36 198-062-007 $9.36 198-062-008 $9.36 198-062-009 $9.36 198-062-010 $9.36 198-062-011 $9.36 198-062-014 $9.36 198-062-019 $9.36 198-062-020 $9.36 198-062-021 $9.36 198-062-022 $9.36 198-062-023 $9.36 198-062-024 $9.36 198-062-026 $9.36 198-062-027 $9.36 198-062-028 $9.36 198-062-029 $9.36 198-062-030 $9.36 198-062-031 $9.36 198-062-032 $9.36 198-062-033 $9.36 198-062-034 $9.36 198-063-001 $9.36 198-063-002 $9.36 198-063-003 $9.36 198-063-004 $9.36 198-063-005 $9.36 198-063-006 $9.36 198-063-007 $9.36 198-063-008 $9.36 198-063-009 $9.36 198-063-010 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 198-063-011 $9.36 198-063-012 $9.36 198-063-013 $9.36 198-063-014 $9.36 198-063-015 $9.36 198-063-016 $9.36 198-071-002 $9.36 198-071-003 $9.36 198-071-004 $9.36 198-071-005 $9.36 198-071-006 $9.36 198-072-001 $9.36 198-072-002 $9.36 198-073-001 $9.36 198-073-002 $9.36 198-073-003 $9.36 198-074-001 $9.36 198-074-002 $9.36 198-074-003 $9.36 198-074-004 $9.36 198-081-001 $9.36 198-081-002 $9.36 198-081-003 $9.36 198-081-004 $9.36 198-081-006 $9.36 198-081-007 $9.36 198-081-008 $9.36 198-081-009 $9.36 198-081-010 $9.36 198-081-011 $9.36 198-081-012 $9.36 198-081-013 $9.36 198-081-014 $9.36 198-081-015 $9.36 198-081-016 $9.36 198-081-017 $9.36 198-081-018 $9.36 198-081-019 $9.36 198-081-020 $9.36 198-082-001 $9.36 198-082-002 $9.36 198-082-003 $9.36 198-082-004 $9.36 198-082-005 $9.36 198-082-006 $9.36 198-082-007 $9.36 198-082-008 $9.36 198-082-009 $9.36 198-082-010 $9.36 198-091-001 $9.36 198-091-003 $9.36 198-091-004 $9.36 198-091-005 $9.36 198-091-006 $9.36 198-091-007 $9.36 198-092-001 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 198-092-002 $9.36 198-092-003 $9.36 198-092-004 $9.36 198-093-001 $9.36 198-093-002 $9.36 198-093-003 $9.36 198-093-004 $9.36 198-093-005 $9.36 198-093-006 $9.36 198-093-007 $9.36 198-093-008 $9.36 198-093-009 $9.36 198-094-001 $9.36 198-094-002 $9.36 198-094-003 $9.36 198-094-005 $9.36 198-094-006 $9.36 198-111-001 $9.36 198-111-002 $9.36 198-111-003 $9.36 198-111-004 $9.36 198-111-005 $9.36 198-111-006 $9.36 198-111-007 $9.36 198-111-008 $9.36 198-111-009 $9.36 198-111-010 $9.36 198-111-011 $9.36 198-111-012 $9.36 198-111-013 $9.36 198-111-014 $9.36 198-111-015 $9.36 198-111-016 $9.36 198-111-017 $9.36 198-111-020 $9.36 198-111-021 $9.36 198-111-022 $9.36 198-111-025 $9.36 198-111-032 $9.36 198-111-033 $9.36 198-111-037 $9.36 198-111-039 $9.36 198-111-040 $9.36 198-111-041 $9.36 198-111-042 $9.36 198-111-043 $9.36 198-112-001 $9.36 198-112-002 $9.36 198-112-003 $9.36 198-112-004 $9.36 198-112-005 $9.36 198-112-006 $9.36 198-112-007 $9.36 198-112-008 $9.36 198-112-009 $9.36 198-112-010 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 198-112-011 $9.36 198-112-012 $9.36 198-120-002 $9.36 198-120-003 $9.36 198-120-004 $9.36 198-120-005 $9.36 198-120-006 $9.36 198-120-007 $9.36 198-120-008 $9.36 198-120-009 $9.36 198-120-010 $9.36 198-120-011 $9.36 198-120-012 $9.36 198-120-017 $9.36 198-120-018 $9.36 198-120-019 $9.36 198-131-001 $9.36 198-131-002 $9.36 198-131-003 $9.36 198-131-004 $9.36 198-131-005 $9.36 198-131-006 $9.36 198-131-007 $9.36 198-131-008 $9.36 198-131-009 $9.36 198-131-010 $9.36 198-131-011 $9.36 198-131-012 $9.36 198-131-013 $9.36 198-131-014 $9.36 198-131-015 $9.36 198-131-016 $9.36 198-131-017 $9.36 198-131-018 $9.36 198-131-019 $9.36 198-131-020 $9.36 198-131-021 $9.36 198-131-022 $9.36 198-131-023 $9.36 198-131-024 $9.36 198-131-025 $9.36 198-131-026 $9.36 198-131-027 $9.36 198-131-028 $9.36 198-131-029 $9.36 198-131-030 $9.36 198-132-004 $9.36 198-132-006 $9.36 198-132-007 $4.68 198-132-008 $9.36 198-132-012 $9.36 198-132-013 $9.36 198-132-014 $9.36 198-132-021 $9.36 198-132-022 $9.36 198-132-023 $9.36 57 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 642 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 36 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2852 MR LEVY CODE: Alamo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 198-132-024 $9.36 198-140-003 $9.36 198-140-004 $9.36 198-140-005 $9.36 198-140-006 $9.36 198-140-007 $9.36 198-140-008 $9.36 198-140-009 $9.36 198-140-010 $9.36 198-140-011 $9.36 198-140-012 $9.36 198-140-013 $9.36 198-140-014 $9.36 198-140-015 $9.36 198-140-016 $9.36 198-140-017 $9.36 198-140-018 $9.36 198-140-019 $9.36 198-140-020 $9.36 198-140-021 $9.36 198-140-024 $9.36 198-140-025 $9.36 198-140-026 $9.36 198-140-027 $9.36 198-140-028 $9.36 198-140-029 $9.36 198-140-030 $9.36 198-140-031 $9.36 198-140-032 $9.36 198-140-033 $9.36 198-140-034 $9.36 198-140-035 $9.36 198-140-036 $9.36 198-140-040 $9.36 198-140-044 $9.36 198-140-045 $9.36 198-151-001 $9.36 198-151-002 $9.36 198-151-003 $9.36 198-151-004 $9.36 198-151-005 $9.36 198-151-006 $9.36 198-152-001 $9.36 198-152-002 $9.36 198-152-003 $9.36 198-152-004 $9.36 198-152-005 $9.36 198-152-009 $9.36 198-152-010 $4.68 198-152-011 $9.36 198-152-012 $9.36 198-152-013 $9.36 198-152-015 $9.36 198-152-017 $9.36 198-160-002 $9.36 198-160-003 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 198-160-004 $9.36 198-160-005 $9.36 198-160-006 $9.36 198-160-007 $9.36 198-160-008 $9.36 198-160-009 $9.36 198-160-010 $9.36 198-160-011 $9.36 198-160-012 $9.36 198-160-013 $9.36 198-160-014 $9.36 198-160-018 $9.36 198-160-019 $9.36 198-160-020 $9.36 198-160-021 $9.36 198-160-022 $9.36 198-160-023 $9.36 198-160-024 $9.36 198-160-025 $9.36 198-160-026 $9.36 198-160-027 $9.36 198-160-028 $9.36 198-160-029 $9.36 198-160-030 $9.36 198-160-031 $9.36 198-160-032 $9.36 198-160-033 $9.36 198-170-006 $4.68 198-170-008 $28.08 198-190-010 $9.36 198-190-011 $9.36 198-190-012 $9.36 198-190-013 $9.36 198-190-018 $9.36 198-190-019 $9.36 198-190-021 $9.36 198-190-022 $9.36 198-190-025 $9.36 198-190-026 $9.36 198-190-027 $9.36 198-190-029 $9.36 198-190-032 $9.36 198-190-033 $9.36 198-190-038 $9.36 198-190-040 $9.36 198-190-041 $9.36 198-200-001 $4.68 198-200-003 $9.36 198-200-005 $9.36 198-200-006 $9.36 198-200-007 $9.36 198-200-008 $9.36 198-200-009 $9.36 198-200-015 $9.36 198-200-018 $9.36 198-200-019 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 198-200-020 $9.36 198-200-021 $9.36 198-200-022 $9.36 198-200-023 $9.36 198-200-024 $9.36 198-220-002 $9.36 198-220-006 $9.36 198-220-008 $9.36 198-220-016 $9.36 198-220-017 $9.36 198-220-018 $9.36 198-220-019 $9.36 198-220-023 $9.36 198-220-024 $9.36 198-220-027 $9.36 198-220-029 $9.36 198-220-030 $9.36 198-220-031 $9.36 198-220-032 $9.36 198-220-033 $9.36 198-220-036 $9.36 198-220-039 $9.36 198-220-040 $9.36 198-220-041 $9.36 198-220-042 $9.36 198-220-045 $9.36 198-220-047 $9.36 198-220-049 $9.36 198-220-050 $9.36 198-220-051 $4.68 198-220-052 $4.68 198-220-053 $9.36 198-230-002 $9.36 198-230-008 $9.36 198-230-010 $9.36 198-230-011 $9.36 198-230-013 $9.36 198-230-014 $9.36 198-230-015 $9.36 198-230-017 $9.36 198-251-002 $9.36 198-251-003 $9.36 198-251-004 $9.36 198-251-005 $9.36 198-251-008 $9.36 198-251-010 $9.36 198-252-001 $9.36 198-252-002 $9.36 198-252-003 $9.36 198-252-004 $9.36 198-252-005 $9.36 198-252-006 $9.36 198-252-007 $9.36 198-252-008 $9.36 198-252-009 $9.36 198-252-010 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 198-252-011 $9.36 198-252-012 $9.36 198-252-013 $9.36 198-252-014 $9.36 198-252-016 $9.36 198-252-020 $9.36 198-252-021 $9.36 198-261-001 $9.36 198-261-002 $9.36 198-261-003 $9.36 198-261-004 $9.36 198-261-005 $9.36 198-261-006 $9.36 198-261-007 $9.36 198-261-008 $9.36 198-261-009 $9.36 198-261-010 $9.36 198-261-011 $9.36 198-261-012 $9.36 198-261-014 $9.36 198-262-001 $9.36 198-262-002 $4.68 198-262-003 $4.68 198-262-004 $4.68 198-270-001 $9.36 198-270-002 $9.36 198-270-003 $9.36 198-270-004 $9.36 198-270-005 $9.36 198-270-006 $9.36 198-270-007 $9.36 198-270-008 $9.36 198-270-009 $9.36 198-270-010 $9.36 198-270-011 $9.36 198-270-012 $9.36 198-270-013 $9.36 198-270-014 $9.36 198-270-015 $9.36 198-270-016 $9.36 198-270-017 $9.36 198-280-001 $9.36 198-280-002 $9.36 198-280-003 $9.36 198-280-005 $9.36 198-280-006 $9.36 198-280-007 $9.36 198-280-008 $9.36 198-280-011 $9.36 198-280-012 $9.36 198-280-013 $9.36 198-280-014 $9.36 198-280-015 $9.36 198-280-016 $9.36 198-280-017 $9.36 198-280-018 $9.36 58 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 643 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 36 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2852 MR LEVY CODE: Alamo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 198-290-001 $9.36 198-290-003 $9.36 198-290-004 $9.36 198-290-005 $9.36 198-290-006 $9.36 198-290-007 $9.36 198-290-008 $9.36 198-290-013 $9.36 198-290-027 $9.36 198-290-028 $9.36 198-290-029 $9.36 198-290-032 $9.36 198-290-033 $9.36 198-290-034 $9.36 198-290-040 $9.36 198-290-041 $9.36 198-290-042 $9.36 198-290-043 $9.36 198-290-045 $9.36 198-290-046 $9.36 198-290-047 $9.36 198-290-048 $9.36 198-290-049 $9.36 201-010-001 $9.36 201-010-002 $9.36 201-010-003 $9.36 201-010-004 $9.36 201-010-005 $9.36 201-010-006 $9.36 201-010-007 $9.36 201-010-008 $9.36 201-010-009 $9.36 201-010-010 $9.36 201-010-011 $9.36 201-010-012 $9.36 201-010-013 $9.36 201-010-014 $9.36 201-010-015 $9.36 201-010-016 $9.36 201-010-017 $9.36 201-010-018 $9.36 201-021-003 $9.36 201-022-003 $9.36 201-022-004 $9.36 201-030-001 $9.36 201-030-002 $9.36 201-030-003 $9.36 201-030-004 $9.36 201-030-005 $9.36 201-030-006 $9.36 201-030-008 $9.36 201-030-009 $9.36 201-030-010 $9.36 201-030-011 $9.36 201-030-012 $9.36 201-030-013 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 201-040-001 $9.36 201-040-002 $9.36 201-040-003 $9.36 201-040-004 $9.36 201-040-005 $9.36 201-040-006 $9.36 201-040-007 $9.36 201-040-008 $9.36 201-040-009 $9.36 201-040-010 $9.36 201-040-011 $9.36 201-040-012 $9.36 201-040-013 $9.36 201-040-014 $9.36 201-040-015 $9.36 201-040-016 $9.36 201-040-017 $9.36 201-040-018 $9.36 201-040-019 $9.36 201-040-020 $9.36 201-040-021 $9.36 201-040-022 $9.36 201-050-023 $9.36 201-050-024 $9.36 201-050-025 $9.36 201-050-026 $9.36 201-050-027 $9.36 201-050-028 $9.36 201-050-029 $9.36 201-050-030 $9.36 201-050-031 $9.36 201-050-032 $9.36 201-050-033 $9.36 201-050-034 $9.36 201-050-035 $9.36 201-050-036 $9.36 201-050-037 $9.36 201-050-039 $9.36 201-050-040 $9.36 201-050-043 $9.36 201-050-045 $9.36 201-050-046 $9.36 201-050-047 $9.36 201-050-053 $9.36 201-050-054 $9.36 201-050-055 $9.36 201-050-056 $9.36 201-050-059 $9.36 201-061-002 $9.36 201-061-003 $9.36 201-061-004 $9.36 201-061-005 $9.36 201-061-006 $9.36 201-061-008 $9.36 201-062-001 $9.36 201-062-002 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 201-062-003 $9.36 201-062-006 $9.36 201-062-007 $9.36 201-062-008 $9.36 201-062-009 $9.36 201-062-010 $9.36 201-062-011 $9.36 201-063-001 $9.36 201-063-002 $9.36 201-063-003 $9.36 201-063-004 $9.36 201-063-005 $9.36 201-063-006 $9.36 201-063-007 $9.36 201-063-008 $9.36 201-063-009 $9.36 201-063-010 $9.36 201-063-012 $9.36 201-063-013 $9.36 201-070-003 $9.36 201-070-009 $9.36 201-070-010 $9.36 201-070-016 $4.68 201-070-017 $9.36 201-070-018 $9.36 201-070-019 $9.36 201-070-020 $9.36 201-081-001 $9.36 201-081-002 $9.36 201-081-003 $9.36 201-082-001 $9.36 201-082-002 $9.36 201-082-003 $9.36 201-082-004 $9.36 201-082-005 $9.36 201-082-006 $9.36 201-082-007 $9.36 201-082-008 $9.36 201-082-012 $9.36 201-082-013 $9.36 201-082-014 $9.36 201-082-016 $9.36 201-082-019 $9.36 201-091-001 $9.36 201-091-002 $9.36 201-091-003 $9.36 201-091-004 $9.36 201-091-005 $9.36 201-091-006 $9.36 201-091-007 $9.36 201-091-008 $9.36 201-091-009 $9.36 201-091-010 $9.36 201-091-011 $9.36 201-091-012 $9.36 201-091-013 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 201-091-014 $9.36 201-092-001 $9.36 201-092-002 $9.36 201-092-003 $9.36 201-092-004 $9.36 201-092-005 $9.36 201-092-006 $9.36 201-092-007 $9.36 201-092-008 $9.36 201-092-009 $9.36 201-100-014 $9.36 201-100-015 $9.36 201-100-019 $9.36 201-100-020 $9.36 201-100-021 $9.36 197-430-001 $4.68 197-430-002 $4.68 197-430-003 $4.68 197-430-004 $4.68 197-430-005 $4.68 197-430-006 $4.68 197-430-007 $4.68 197-430-008 $4.68 197-430-009 $4.68 197-430-010 $4.68 193-020-014 $9.36 193-020-015 $9.36 193-930-001 $9.36 193-930-002 $9.36 193-930-003 $9.36 193-930-004 $9.36 193-930-005 $9.36 193-930-006 $9.36 193-930-007 $9.36 193-930-008 $9.36 193-930-009 $9.36 193-930-010 $9.36 193-930-011 $9.36 193-930-012 $9.36 193-930-013 $9.36 193-930-014 $9.36 193-930-015 $9.36 193-940-001 $9.36 193-940-002 $9.36 193-940-003 $9.36 193-940-004 $9.36 193-940-005 $9.36 193-940-006 $9.36 193-940-007 $9.36 193-940-008 $9.36 193-940-009 $9.36 193-940-010 $9.36 193-940-011 $9.36 193-940-012 $9.36 193-940-013 $9.36 193-940-014 $9.36 59 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 644 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 36 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2852 MR LEVY CODE: Alamo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 193-940-015 $9.36 193-940-016 $9.36 193-940-017 $9.36 193-940-018 $9.36 193-940-021 $9.36 193-940-022 $9.36 193-940-023 $9.36 193-940-024 $9.36 193-350-036 $9.36 193-430-038 $9.36 193-470-027 $14.04 194-100-008 $9.36 194-100-009 $9.36 195-410-018 $9.36 195-410-019 $9.36 201-022-005 $9.36 201-022-006 $9.36 196-080-042 $9.36 196-080-043 $9.36 193-080-120 $9.36 193-080-121 $4.68 193-552-023 $9.36 193-552-024 $9.36 198-160-035 $9.36 198-160-036 $9.36 198-160-037 $9.36 188-210-045 $9.36 188-210-046 $9.36 188-302-021 $9.36 188-302-022 $9.36 188-330-034 $9.36 188-330-035 $9.36 193-080-122 $9.36 193-340-052 $9.36 193-940-028 $9.36 193-940-029 $9.36 194-222-018 $9.36 194-222-019 $9.36 196-050-019 $9.36 196-050-020 $9.36 187-231-034 $9.36 187-231-035 $9.36 187-330-033 $9.36 187-330-032 $9.36 188-311-010 $9.36 188-311-011 $4.68 191-190-001 $4.68 191-190-002 $4.68 191-190-003 $4.68 191-190-004 $4.68 191-190-005 $4.68 191-190-006 $4.68 191-190-007 $4.68 191-190-008 $4.68 191-190-009 $4.68 191-190-010 $4.68 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 191-190-011 $4.68 191-190-012 $4.68 191-190-013 $4.68 191-190-014 $4.68 191-190-015 $4.68 191-190-016 $4.68 191-190-017 $4.68 191-190-018 $4.68 191-190-019 $4.68 191-200-001 $4.68 191-200-002 $4.68 191-200-003 $4.68 191-200-004 $4.68 191-200-005 $4.68 191-200-006 $4.68 191-200-007 $4.68 191-200-008 $4.68 191-210-001 $4.68 191-210-002 $4.68 191-210-003 $4.68 191-210-004 $4.68 191-210-005 $4.68 191-210-006 $4.68 191-210-007 $4.68 191-210-008 $4.68 191-210-009 $4.68 191-210-010 $4.68 193-190-031 $9.36 193-190-032 $9.36 193-690-069 $9.36 193-430-039 $9.36 193-690-070 $9.36 196-031-010 $9.36 196-031-011 $4.68 198-030-038 $9.36 198-030-039 $9.36 188-210-047 $9.36 188-210-048 $4.68 192-071-066 $9.36 192-071-067 $9.36 198-220-055 $4.68 198-220-056 $9.36 193-010-039 $9.36 198-081-021 $9.36 198-081-022 $9.36 196-092-007 $9.36 196-092-008 $9.36 198-160-038 $9.36 198-160-039 $9.36 193-170-063 $14.04 193-170-064 $7.02 187-130-023 $9.36 191-040-034 $9.36 193-080-123 $9.36 196-110-052 $9.36 196-110-053 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 197-170-018 $9.36 197-470-033 $9.36 192-240-024 $9.36 192-240-025 $4.68 198-100-005 $4.68 198-100-006 $4.68 191-130-005 $9.36 191-130-006 $4.68 198-100-009 $4.68 198-100-010 $9.36 5498Total Parcels: $50,377.84 Total Assessment: 60 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 645 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 37 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2853 LV LEVY CODE: Clyde Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 100-293-001 $41.76 100-293-002 $41.76 100-293-003 $41.76 100-293-005 $41.76 100-293-006 $41.76 100-293-007 $41.76 100-293-008 $41.76 100-293-009 $41.76 100-293-013 $41.76 100-293-015 $41.76 100-293-016 $41.76 100-293-017 $41.76 100-293-018 $41.76 100-303-002 $41.76 100-303-003 $41.76 100-303-004 $41.76 100-303-005 $20.88 100-303-006 $41.76 100-303-007 $41.76 100-303-008 $20.88 100-303-009 $41.76 100-303-010 $41.76 100-303-011 $41.76 100-303-012 $41.76 100-303-013 $41.76 100-303-014 $41.76 100-303-015 $41.76 100-303-016 $41.76 100-303-019 $41.76 100-304-002 $41.76 100-304-007 $41.76 100-304-008 $41.76 100-311-025 $41.76 100-313-015 $41.76 100-313-018 $41.76 100-313-020 $41.76 100-313-021 $20.88 100-313-025 $41.76 100-313-028 $41.76 100-313-029 $41.76 100-313-032 $20.88 100-313-034 $41.76 100-313-041 $41.76 100-313-043 $41.76 100-313-045 $41.76 100-313-046 $41.76 100-313-047 $41.76 100-313-048 $41.76 100-313-049 $20.88 100-313-050 $41.76 100-314-004 $41.76 100-314-005 $41.76 100-321-016 $41.76 100-321-025 $41.76 100-321-027 $20.88 100-321-028 $20.88 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 100-321-029 $41.76 100-321-038 $20.88 100-321-039 $41.76 100-321-040 $334.08 100-321-041 $45.52 100-321-045 $41.76 100-321-047 $41.76 100-321-048 $41.76 100-321-049 $41.76 100-321-050 $41.76 100-321-051 $41.76 100-321-052 $41.76 100-321-054 $41.76 100-401-011 $41.76 100-401-012 $41.76 100-401-013 $41.76 100-401-014 $41.76 100-401-015 $20.88 100-401-017 $41.76 100-401-024 $20.88 100-401-025 $41.76 100-401-026 $41.76 100-401-027 $41.76 100-401-028 $41.76 100-401-029 $41.76 100-401-030 $41.76 100-401-031 $41.76 100-401-032 $41.76 100-401-033 $41.76 100-401-034 $41.76 100-401-035 $41.76 100-401-036 $41.76 100-401-037 $41.76 100-401-038 $41.76 100-401-039 $41.76 100-401-040 $41.76 100-401-041 $41.76 100-401-042 $41.76 100-401-043 $41.76 100-401-044 $41.76 100-401-045 $41.76 100-410-004 $41.76 100-410-005 $41.76 100-410-006 $20.88 100-410-007 $41.76 100-410-008 $41.76 100-410-009 $41.76 100-410-010 $41.76 100-410-011 $41.76 100-410-012 $41.76 100-410-013 $41.76 100-410-014 $41.76 100-410-015 $41.76 100-410-016 $41.76 100-410-017 $41.76 100-410-018 $41.76 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 100-410-019 $41.76 100-410-020 $41.76 100-410-021 $41.76 100-410-022 $41.76 100-410-023 $41.76 100-410-024 $41.76 100-410-025 $41.76 100-410-026 $41.76 100-410-027 $41.76 100-410-028 $41.76 100-410-029 $41.76 100-410-030 $41.76 100-410-031 $41.76 100-411-001 $41.76 100-411-002 $41.76 100-411-003 $41.76 100-411-004 $41.76 100-411-005 $41.76 100-411-006 $41.76 100-411-007 $41.76 100-411-008 $41.76 100-411-009 $41.76 100-411-010 $41.76 100-411-011 $41.76 100-411-012 $41.76 100-411-013 $41.76 100-411-014 $41.76 100-411-015 $41.76 100-411-016 $20.88 100-412-001 $41.76 100-412-002 $41.76 100-412-003 $41.76 100-412-004 $41.76 100-412-005 $41.76 100-412-006 $41.76 100-412-007 $41.76 100-412-008 $41.76 100-412-009 $20.88 100-412-010 $41.76 100-412-011 $41.76 100-412-012 $20.88 100-412-013 $41.76 100-412-014 $41.76 100-412-015 $20.88 100-412-016 $41.76 100-412-017 $20.88 100-412-018 $41.76 100-412-019 $41.76 100-412-020 $41.76 100-412-021 $41.76 100-420-001 $20.88 100-420-002 $41.76 100-420-003 $41.76 100-420-004 $41.76 100-420-005 $41.76 100-420-006 $41.76 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 100-420-007 $41.76 100-420-008 $41.76 100-420-009 $41.76 100-420-010 $41.76 100-420-011 $41.76 100-420-012 $41.76 100-420-013 $41.76 100-420-014 $41.76 100-420-015 $41.76 100-420-018 $41.76 100-420-019 $41.76 100-420-020 $41.76 100-430-001 $41.76 100-430-002 $41.76 100-430-003 $41.76 100-430-007 $41.76 100-430-008 $41.76 100-430-009 $41.76 100-430-010 $41.76 100-430-011 $41.76 100-430-012 $41.76 100-430-014 $41.76 100-430-015 $41.76 100-430-016 $41.76 100-430-017 $41.76 100-291-017 $41.76 100-291-018 $41.76 100-291-019 $20.88 100-291-020 $41.76 100-291-021 $41.76 100-291-022 $41.76 100-291-023 $41.76 100-291-024 $41.76 100-291-025 $41.76 100-291-026 $41.76 100-292-017 $41.76 100-292-018 $20.88 100-292-019 $41.76 100-292-020 $41.76 100-292-021 $41.76 100-292-022 $20.88 100-292-023 $41.76 100-292-024 $41.76 100-292-025 $41.76 100-292-026 $41.76 100-292-027 $41.76 100-301-019 $20.88 100-301-020 $41.76 100-301-021 $41.76 100-301-022 $41.76 100-301-023 $41.76 100-301-024 $41.76 100-301-025 $41.76 100-301-026 $41.76 100-301-027 $41.76 100-301-028 $20.88 61 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 646 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 37 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2853 LV LEVY CODE: Clyde Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 100-301-029 $41.76 100-301-030 $41.76 100-301-031 $41.76 100-301-032 $41.76 100-301-033 $41.76 100-301-034 $20.88 100-301-035 $20.88 100-302-018 $41.76 100-302-019 $41.76 100-302-020 $41.76 100-302-021 $41.76 100-302-022 $41.76 100-302-023 $41.76 100-302-024 $41.76 100-302-025 $41.76 100-302-026 $41.76 100-302-027 $41.76 100-302-028 $41.76 100-302-029 $20.88 100-302-030 $41.76 100-302-031 $41.76 100-302-032 $41.76 100-302-033 $41.76 100-302-034 $41.76 100-311-028 $41.76 100-311-029 $20.88 100-311-030 $41.76 100-311-031 $41.76 100-311-032 $41.76 100-311-033 $41.76 100-311-034 $41.76 100-311-035 $41.76 100-311-036 $41.76 100-311-037 $41.76 100-311-038 $41.76 100-311-039 $41.76 100-311-040 $41.76 100-311-041 $41.76 100-311-042 $20.88 100-311-043 $41.76 100-311-044 $41.76 100-311-045 $41.76 100-311-046 $41.76 100-312-024 $41.76 100-312-025 $41.76 100-312-026 $41.76 100-312-027 $41.76 100-312-028 $41.76 100-312-029 $41.76 100-312-030 $41.76 100-312-031 $41.76 100-312-032 $41.76 100-312-033 $41.76 100-312-034 $41.76 100-312-035 $41.76 100-312-036 $41.76 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 100-312-037 $41.76 100-312-038 $41.76 100-312-039 $41.76 100-321-056 $20.88 100-401-046 $41.76 100-321-057 $20.88 286Total Parcels: $11,633.92 Total Assessment: 62 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 647 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 38 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2854 LT LEVY CODE: Rodeo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 357-020-009 $96.12 357-020-010 $48.06 357-020-025 $19.54 357-041-001 $32.04 357-041-002 $32.04 357-041-003 $32.04 357-041-005 $32.04 357-041-010 $32.04 357-041-011 $16.02 357-041-013 $32.04 357-042-001 $32.04 357-042-003 $32.04 357-042-004 $16.02 357-042-005 $48.06 357-042-006 $48.06 357-042-007 $32.04 357-042-008 $16.02 357-042-009 $16.02 357-042-010 $32.04 357-042-011 $16.02 357-042-012 $32.04 357-042-013 $32.04 357-042-014 $16.02 357-042-015 $32.04 357-042-017 $32.04 357-042-018 $32.04 357-042-022 $32.04 357-042-025 $32.04 357-043-001 $96.12 357-043-003 $32.04 357-043-004 $32.04 357-044-001 $32.04 357-044-002 $32.04 357-044-003 $32.04 357-044-006 $32.04 357-044-007 $48.06 357-044-008 $32.04 357-044-009 $32.04 357-044-010 $32.04 357-044-011 $32.04 357-044-012 $32.04 357-044-014 $32.04 357-044-015 $32.04 357-044-016 $48.06 357-045-001 $64.08 357-045-002 $32.04 357-045-003 $32.04 357-045-004 $32.04 357-045-006 $32.04 357-045-007 $32.04 357-046-001 $32.04 357-046-002 $32.04 357-046-003 $32.04 357-046-004 $32.04 357-046-005 $32.04 357-046-006 $32.04 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 357-046-007 $32.04 357-046-008 $32.04 357-046-009 $32.04 357-046-012 $32.04 357-046-013 $32.04 357-046-014 $32.04 357-046-015 $32.04 357-046-016 $32.04 357-046-017 $32.04 357-046-021 $32.04 357-046-024 $32.04 357-046-025 $32.04 357-046-026 $32.04 357-047-001 $32.04 357-047-002 $32.04 357-047-003 $32.04 357-047-007 $32.04 357-047-009 $32.04 357-047-010 $48.06 357-047-011 $32.04 357-047-012 $32.04 357-047-015 $64.08 357-047-016 $32.04 357-047-018 $32.04 357-047-019 $32.04 357-047-020 $32.04 357-051-002 $32.04 357-051-003 $32.04 357-051-004 $32.04 357-052-001 $32.04 357-052-002 $16.02 357-052-003 $32.04 357-052-004 $32.04 357-052-007 $32.04 357-052-008 $32.04 357-052-014 $48.06 357-052-015 $16.02 357-052-016 $32.04 357-052-017 $32.04 357-053-001 $32.04 357-053-002 $32.04 357-053-003 $32.04 357-053-004 $32.04 357-053-005 $32.04 357-053-006 $32.04 357-053-007 $32.04 357-053-010 $32.04 357-053-011 $32.04 357-053-014 $48.06 357-053-015 $48.06 357-053-016 $48.06 357-053-017 $96.12 357-053-018 $32.04 357-053-019 $32.04 357-053-020 $32.04 357-054-004 $32.04 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 357-054-005 $32.04 357-054-006 $32.04 357-054-007 $32.04 357-054-008 $32.04 357-054-009 $32.04 357-054-010 $32.04 357-054-011 $80.10 357-054-014 $32.04 357-054-015 $32.04 357-054-016 $32.04 357-054-020 $32.04 357-054-021 $32.04 357-061-003 $32.04 357-061-004 $32.04 357-061-005 $16.02 357-061-009 $32.04 357-061-010 $16.02 357-061-011 $48.06 357-061-013 $32.04 357-061-015 $32.04 357-061-016 $32.04 357-061-017 $32.04 357-061-018 $32.04 357-061-019 $32.04 357-061-020 $32.04 357-061-022 $32.04 357-061-025 $32.04 357-061-026 $16.02 357-061-027 $32.04 357-062-001 $32.04 357-062-002 $32.04 357-062-003 $32.04 357-062-004 $32.04 357-062-005 $32.04 357-062-006 $32.04 357-062-007 $32.04 357-062-008 $32.04 357-062-009 $32.04 357-062-011 $32.04 357-062-012 $32.04 357-062-016 $32.04 357-062-017 $32.04 357-063-003 $32.04 357-063-004 $32.04 357-063-006 $48.06 357-063-013 $32.04 357-063-014 $32.04 357-063-015 $32.04 357-071-001 $32.04 357-071-002 $32.04 357-071-003 $32.04 357-071-004 $32.04 357-071-006 $32.04 357-071-007 $32.04 357-071-008 $32.04 357-071-009 $32.04 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 357-071-010 $32.04 357-071-011 $32.04 357-071-013 $32.04 357-071-014 $32.04 357-071-015 $32.04 357-071-016 $32.04 357-071-017 $32.04 357-071-018 $32.04 357-071-019 $32.04 357-071-020 $32.04 357-071-021 $32.04 357-071-022 $32.04 357-071-023 $32.04 357-071-024 $32.04 357-071-026 $32.04 357-071-027 $32.04 357-071-028 $32.04 357-071-029 $32.04 357-071-031 $32.04 357-071-032 $32.04 357-071-033 $32.04 357-071-034 $32.04 357-072-001 $32.04 357-072-004 $32.04 357-072-005 $32.04 357-072-006 $32.04 357-072-007 $32.04 357-072-008 $32.04 357-072-010 $32.04 357-072-012 $32.04 357-072-013 $32.04 357-072-014 $32.04 357-072-015 $32.04 357-072-017 $32.04 357-072-018 $32.04 357-072-019 $32.04 357-072-020 $32.04 357-072-021 $32.04 357-072-022 $32.04 357-072-026 $32.04 357-072-028 $32.04 357-072-029 $32.04 357-073-001 $32.04 357-073-002 $32.04 357-073-003 $32.04 357-081-001 $480.60 357-081-002 $80.10 357-081-003 $16.02 357-081-004 $32.04 357-081-006 $32.04 357-081-007 $32.04 357-081-011 $32.04 357-081-012 $32.04 357-081-013 $32.04 357-081-014 $64.08 357-081-017 $32.04 63 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 648 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 38 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2854 LT LEVY CODE: Rodeo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 357-081-021 $32.04 357-081-029 $32.04 357-081-032 $32.04 357-081-033 $32.04 357-081-034 $32.04 357-081-035 $32.04 357-081-036 $32.04 357-081-037 $32.04 357-081-038 $32.04 357-082-002 $32.04 357-082-003 $32.04 357-082-004 $32.04 357-082-005 $32.04 357-082-006 $32.04 357-082-007 $32.04 357-082-008 $32.04 357-082-009 $32.04 357-082-010 $32.04 357-082-011 $32.04 357-082-012 $32.04 357-082-013 $32.04 357-082-014 $32.04 357-082-015 $32.04 357-082-016 $192.24 357-082-019 $32.04 357-082-022 $96.12 357-082-023 $32.04 357-082-025 $32.04 357-082-027 $32.04 357-082-028 $32.04 357-082-029 $32.04 357-082-030 $32.04 357-083-001 $32.04 357-083-003 $32.04 357-083-004 $32.04 357-083-005 $32.04 357-083-006 $32.04 357-083-007 $32.04 357-083-009 $32.04 357-083-012 $32.04 357-083-013 $32.04 357-083-014 $32.04 357-083-015 $32.04 357-083-016 $32.04 357-083-017 $32.04 357-083-018 $32.04 357-083-019 $32.04 357-083-020 $32.04 357-083-021 $32.04 357-083-023 $32.04 357-083-024 $32.04 357-083-025 $32.04 357-083-026 $32.04 357-083-027 $32.04 357-083-028 $32.04 357-083-029 $32.04 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 357-083-030 $32.04 357-083-031 $32.04 357-083-032 $32.04 357-083-033 $32.04 357-091-005 $64.08 357-091-006 $32.04 357-091-007 $32.04 357-091-011 $32.04 357-091-012 $32.04 357-091-014 $32.04 357-091-015 $32.04 357-091-018 $32.04 357-091-019 $32.04 357-091-020 $32.04 357-091-021 $32.04 357-091-023 $32.04 357-091-030 $32.04 357-091-031 $32.04 357-091-032 $96.12 357-091-033 $32.04 357-091-034 $32.04 357-091-035 $32.04 357-091-036 $32.04 357-091-037 $32.04 357-091-039 $32.04 357-091-040 $32.04 357-091-041 $32.04 357-093-002 $32.04 357-093-003 $32.04 357-093-004 $32.04 357-093-006 $32.04 357-093-007 $32.04 357-093-008 $32.04 357-093-009 $32.04 357-093-010 $32.04 357-093-011 $32.04 357-093-012 $32.04 357-093-013 $32.04 357-093-014 $32.04 357-093-015 $32.04 357-093-016 $32.04 357-093-017 $32.04 357-093-018 $32.04 357-093-022 $32.04 357-093-023 $32.04 357-093-024 $32.04 357-093-025 $32.04 357-093-026 $32.04 357-093-027 $32.04 357-093-028 $16.02 357-094-001 $32.04 357-094-002 $32.04 357-101-001 $128.16 357-101-002 $16.02 357-101-003 $32.04 357-101-004 $32.04 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 357-101-005 $32.04 357-101-006 $32.04 357-101-007 $352.44 357-102-001 $32.04 357-102-003 $32.04 357-102-004 $32.04 357-102-005 $32.04 357-102-006 $32.04 357-102-007 $32.04 357-102-008 $32.04 357-102-010 $32.04 357-102-011 $32.04 357-102-012 $16.02 357-102-013 $32.04 357-102-014 $32.04 357-103-001 $32.04 357-103-004 $64.08 357-103-006 $32.04 357-103-007 $32.04 357-103-008 $32.04 357-103-010 $32.04 357-103-013 $32.04 357-103-014 $32.04 357-103-015 $32.04 357-111-001 $32.04 357-111-002 $32.04 357-111-003 $32.04 357-111-009 $32.04 357-111-010 $16.02 357-111-012 $32.04 357-111-013 $32.04 357-111-014 $16.02 357-111-015 $32.04 357-111-017 $32.04 357-111-019 $32.04 357-111-020 $32.04 357-111-022 $32.04 357-111-023 $32.04 357-111-024 $32.04 357-111-025 $32.04 357-111-026 $32.04 357-111-027 $32.04 357-111-028 $32.04 357-111-029 $32.04 357-111-034 $32.04 357-111-035 $32.04 357-112-001 $32.04 357-112-002 $32.04 357-112-003 $32.04 357-112-004 $32.04 357-112-005 $32.04 357-112-006 $32.04 357-112-007 $32.04 357-112-008 $32.04 357-112-009 $32.04 357-112-010 $32.04 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 357-112-011 $32.04 357-112-013 $32.04 357-112-014 $32.04 357-112-016 $32.04 357-112-017 $32.04 357-112-018 $32.04 357-112-019 $32.04 357-112-020 $32.04 357-112-021 $32.04 357-112-022 $32.04 357-112-023 $32.04 357-112-025 $32.04 357-112-026 $32.04 357-112-027 $32.04 357-113-001 $32.04 357-113-002 $32.04 357-113-003 $32.04 357-120-002 $32.04 357-120-003 $16.02 357-120-013 $32.04 357-120-014 $32.04 357-120-015 $32.04 357-120-016 $32.04 357-120-017 $32.04 357-120-018 $32.04 357-120-019 $32.04 357-120-020 $32.04 357-120-021 $32.04 357-120-022 $32.04 357-120-023 $32.04 357-120-024 $32.04 357-120-025 $32.04 357-120-026 $32.04 357-120-027 $32.04 357-120-028 $32.04 357-120-029 $32.04 357-120-030 $32.04 357-120-031 $32.04 357-120-032 $32.04 357-120-033 $32.04 357-120-034 $32.04 357-120-035 $32.04 357-120-036 $32.04 357-120-037 $32.04 357-120-038 $32.04 357-120-039 $32.04 357-120-040 $32.04 357-120-041 $32.04 357-120-042 $32.04 357-120-043 $32.04 357-120-044 $32.04 357-120-045 $32.04 357-120-046 $32.04 357-120-047 $32.04 357-120-048 $32.04 357-120-049 $32.04 64 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 649 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 38 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2854 LT LEVY CODE: Rodeo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 357-120-050 $32.04 357-120-051 $32.04 357-120-052 $32.04 357-120-053 $32.04 357-120-054 $32.04 357-120-055 $32.04 357-120-056 $32.04 357-120-057 $32.04 357-120-058 $32.04 357-120-059 $32.04 357-120-060 $32.04 357-120-061 $32.04 357-120-062 $32.04 357-120-063 $32.04 357-120-064 $32.04 357-120-065 $32.04 357-120-066 $32.04 357-120-067 $32.04 357-120-068 $32.04 357-120-069 $32.04 357-120-070 $32.04 357-120-073 $801.00 357-131-001 $32.04 357-131-003 $32.04 357-131-005 $32.04 357-131-006 $32.04 357-131-007 $32.04 357-131-009 $32.04 357-131-010 $32.04 357-131-012 $32.04 357-131-013 $32.04 357-131-014 $32.04 357-131-015 $32.04 357-131-016 $32.04 357-131-017 $32.04 357-131-019 $32.04 357-131-020 $32.04 357-140-010 $16.02 357-140-011 $32.04 357-140-016 $16.02 357-140-032 $32.04 357-140-033 $240.30 357-140-036 $32.04 357-140-037 $32.04 357-140-039 $32.04 357-140-041 $32.04 357-140-043 $32.04 357-140-044 $32.04 357-140-045 $16.02 357-140-046 $176.22 357-140-047 $48.06 357-151-002 $32.04 357-151-008 $32.04 357-151-013 $32.04 357-151-014 $32.04 357-151-020 $32.04 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 357-151-027 $32.04 357-151-028 $32.04 357-151-029 $32.04 357-151-030 $32.04 357-151-031 $32.04 357-151-032 $32.04 357-151-035 $32.04 357-151-036 $32.04 357-151-037 $32.04 357-152-001 $32.04 357-152-002 $32.04 357-152-003 $32.04 357-152-004 $32.04 357-152-006 $32.04 357-152-007 $32.04 357-152-010 $32.04 357-152-011 $32.04 357-152-012 $32.04 357-152-014 $48.06 357-152-015 $32.04 357-152-016 $32.04 357-152-017 $32.04 357-152-018 $32.04 357-152-019 $32.04 357-152-020 $32.04 357-152-021 $32.04 357-152-022 $32.04 357-152-027 $96.12 357-152-031 $160.20 357-152-033 $64.08 357-152-034 $32.04 357-152-035 $32.04 357-152-036 $32.04 357-152-037 $32.04 357-161-006 $32.04 357-161-007 $32.04 357-161-008 $32.04 357-161-009 $32.04 357-161-010 $32.04 357-162-002 $32.04 357-162-003 $32.04 357-162-005 $32.04 357-162-006 $32.04 357-162-007 $32.04 357-162-010 $32.04 357-162-011 $32.04 357-162-012 $32.04 357-162-017 $32.04 357-162-018 $48.06 357-162-019 $32.04 357-162-028 $32.04 357-162-029 $32.04 357-162-032 $32.04 357-162-033 $32.04 357-162-034 $32.04 357-163-005 $32.04 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 357-163-006 $32.04 357-163-007 $32.04 357-163-010 $32.04 357-163-016 $32.04 357-163-017 $32.04 357-163-025 $144.18 357-163-026 $48.06 357-163-027 $64.08 357-163-028 $32.04 357-163-031 $32.04 357-171-001 $32.04 357-171-002 $16.02 357-171-003 $32.04 357-171-004 $32.04 357-171-005 $32.04 357-171-008 $16.02 357-171-009 $32.04 357-171-010 $16.02 357-171-013 $64.08 357-171-014 $128.16 357-171-016 $96.12 357-171-018 $160.20 357-171-019 $32.04 357-171-020 $16.02 357-172-005 $48.06 357-172-006 $48.06 357-173-002 $32.04 357-173-003 $32.04 357-173-004 $32.04 357-173-005 $32.04 357-173-006 $32.04 357-173-007 $32.04 357-173-008 $32.04 357-173-009 $32.04 357-173-010 $32.04 357-173-011 $32.04 357-173-012 $32.04 357-173-013 $32.04 357-173-014 $32.04 357-173-015 $32.04 357-173-016 $32.04 357-173-018 $32.04 357-173-019 $32.04 357-173-020 $32.04 357-174-001 $32.04 357-174-002 $32.04 357-174-003 $32.04 357-174-004 $32.04 357-174-005 $32.04 357-174-006 $32.04 357-174-007 $32.04 357-174-008 $32.04 357-174-009 $32.04 357-174-010 $32.04 357-174-011 $32.04 357-174-012 $32.04 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 357-174-013 $32.04 357-174-014 $32.04 357-174-015 $32.04 357-174-016 $32.04 357-174-017 $32.04 357-174-018 $32.04 357-174-019 $32.04 357-174-020 $32.04 357-174-021 $32.04 357-174-022 $32.04 357-175-001 $32.04 357-175-002 $32.04 357-175-003 $32.04 357-175-004 $32.04 357-175-005 $32.04 357-175-006 $32.04 357-175-007 $32.04 357-175-008 $32.04 357-175-009 $32.04 357-181-001 $32.04 357-181-002 $32.04 357-181-003 $32.04 357-181-004 $32.04 357-181-009 $320.40 357-181-010 $32.04 357-181-011 $32.04 357-182-001 $32.04 357-182-008 $32.04 357-182-010 $48.06 357-182-011 $64.08 357-182-012 $80.10 357-183-001 $80.10 357-183-002 $32.04 357-183-003 $32.04 357-183-004 $64.08 357-183-005 $32.04 357-183-006 $144.18 357-183-007 $32.04 357-183-008 $32.04 357-183-009 $32.04 357-183-010 $32.04 357-183-011 $32.04 357-183-012 $32.04 357-183-013 $32.04 357-183-014 $32.04 357-183-015 $128.16 357-184-001 $32.04 357-184-004 $32.04 357-184-005 $32.04 357-184-007 $32.04 357-184-008 $32.04 357-184-009 $32.04 357-184-010 $32.04 357-184-011 $32.04 357-184-012 $16.02 357-184-013 $16.02 65 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 650 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 38 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2854 LT LEVY CODE: Rodeo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 357-184-014 $32.04 357-185-001 $32.04 357-186-002 $32.04 357-186-004 $32.04 357-186-005 $32.04 357-186-008 $32.04 357-186-013 $32.04 357-186-014 $16.02 357-186-015 $32.04 357-191-001 $32.04 357-191-002 $32.04 357-191-003 $32.04 357-191-004 $32.04 357-191-005 $32.04 357-191-006 $32.04 357-191-007 $32.04 357-191-008 $32.04 357-191-009 $32.04 357-191-010 $32.04 357-191-011 $32.04 357-191-012 $32.04 357-191-014 $32.04 357-191-015 $32.04 357-191-016 $32.04 357-191-017 $32.04 357-191-018 $32.04 357-191-019 $32.04 357-191-020 $32.04 357-191-022 $32.04 357-191-023 $32.04 357-191-024 $32.04 357-191-025 $32.04 357-191-026 $16.02 357-192-001 $32.04 357-192-002 $32.04 357-192-003 $32.04 357-192-004 $32.04 357-192-005 $32.04 357-192-006 $32.04 357-192-007 $32.04 357-192-008 $32.04 357-192-009 $32.04 357-192-010 $32.04 357-193-006 $32.04 357-193-007 $32.04 357-193-008 $32.04 357-193-009 $32.04 357-193-010 $32.04 357-193-011 $32.04 357-193-012 $32.04 357-193-013 $32.04 357-194-001 $16.02 357-194-003 $32.04 357-194-004 $32.04 357-194-005 $32.04 357-194-006 $32.04 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 357-195-001 $32.04 357-195-002 $32.04 357-195-003 $32.04 357-195-007 $32.04 357-195-009 $32.04 357-195-010 $32.04 357-195-012 $32.04 357-195-013 $32.04 357-195-014 $32.04 357-195-015 $32.04 357-195-016 $32.04 357-195-017 $32.04 357-195-018 $32.04 357-195-019 $32.04 357-195-020 $32.04 357-196-004 $32.04 357-196-005 $32.04 357-196-006 $32.04 357-196-007 $32.04 357-196-008 $32.04 357-196-009 $32.04 357-196-010 $16.02 357-196-011 $32.04 357-196-012 $16.02 357-196-013 $32.04 357-196-014 $32.04 357-196-015 $32.04 357-196-016 $32.04 357-196-017 $32.04 357-197-002 $32.04 357-197-005 $32.04 357-197-006 $32.04 357-197-007 $32.04 357-197-008 $32.04 357-197-009 $32.04 357-197-010 $32.04 357-197-011 $32.04 357-197-012 $32.04 357-197-013 $32.04 357-197-014 $32.04 357-197-015 $32.04 357-197-016 $32.04 357-198-001 $32.04 357-198-002 $32.04 357-198-003 $32.04 357-198-004 $32.04 357-198-005 $32.04 357-198-007 $32.04 357-198-009 $32.04 357-198-011 $32.04 357-198-012 $32.04 357-198-013 $32.04 357-198-014 $32.04 357-198-015 $32.04 357-198-016 $32.04 357-199-001 $32.04 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 357-199-002 $32.04 357-199-003 $32.04 357-199-004 $32.04 357-199-005 $32.04 357-201-001 $32.04 357-201-002 $32.04 357-201-003 $32.04 357-201-004 $32.04 357-201-005 $32.04 357-201-006 $32.04 357-201-007 $32.04 357-201-008 $32.04 357-201-009 $32.04 357-201-016 $48.06 357-201-017 $32.04 357-201-018 $32.04 357-201-019 $32.04 357-201-020 $32.04 357-201-021 $32.04 357-201-022 $32.04 357-201-023 $32.04 357-201-024 $32.04 357-201-025 $32.04 357-201-026 $32.04 357-201-027 $32.04 357-201-029 $32.04 357-202-001 $32.04 357-202-002 $32.04 357-202-003 $32.04 357-202-005 $32.04 357-202-006 $32.04 357-202-007 $32.04 357-202-008 $32.04 357-202-009 $32.04 357-202-013 $32.04 357-202-014 $32.04 357-202-015 $32.04 357-202-016 $32.04 357-202-017 $32.04 357-202-018 $32.04 357-202-019 $32.04 357-202-020 $32.04 357-202-021 $32.04 357-202-022 $32.04 357-202-023 $32.04 357-202-024 $32.04 357-203-002 $32.04 357-203-003 $32.04 357-203-004 $32.04 357-203-005 $32.04 357-203-006 $32.04 357-203-007 $32.04 357-203-008 $32.04 357-203-009 $32.04 357-203-010 $32.04 357-203-011 $32.04 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 357-203-012 $32.04 357-203-013 $32.04 357-203-014 $32.04 357-204-003 $32.04 357-204-006 $32.04 357-204-007 $32.04 357-204-009 $32.04 357-204-010 $32.04 357-204-012 $80.10 357-204-013 $32.04 357-204-014 $32.04 357-204-015 $80.10 357-204-017 $32.04 357-204-018 $32.04 357-210-004 $48.06 357-210-007 $16.02 357-210-008 $48.06 357-210-009 $48.06 357-210-010 $48.06 357-210-011 $48.06 357-221-001 $32.04 357-221-002 $32.04 357-221-003 $32.04 357-221-004 $32.04 357-221-005 $32.04 357-221-006 $32.04 357-221-007 $32.04 357-221-008 $32.04 357-221-009 $32.04 357-221-010 $32.04 357-221-011 $32.04 357-221-012 $32.04 357-221-013 $32.04 357-221-014 $32.04 357-221-015 $32.04 357-222-001 $32.04 357-222-002 $32.04 357-222-003 $32.04 357-222-004 $32.04 357-222-005 $32.04 357-222-006 $32.04 357-222-007 $32.04 357-222-008 $32.04 357-222-009 $32.04 357-222-010 $32.04 357-222-011 $32.04 357-222-012 $32.04 357-222-013 $32.04 357-222-014 $32.04 357-222-015 $32.04 357-222-016 $32.04 357-222-017 $32.04 357-222-018 $32.04 357-222-019 $32.04 357-222-020 $32.04 357-222-021 $32.04 66 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 651 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 38 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2854 LT LEVY CODE: Rodeo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 357-222-022 $32.04 357-223-001 $32.04 357-223-002 $32.04 357-223-003 $32.04 357-223-004 $32.04 357-223-005 $32.04 357-223-006 $32.04 357-223-007 $32.04 357-223-008 $32.04 357-223-009 $32.04 357-223-010 $32.04 357-223-011 $32.04 357-223-012 $32.04 357-223-013 $32.04 357-223-014 $32.04 357-223-015 $32.04 357-223-016 $32.04 357-223-017 $32.04 357-223-018 $32.04 357-223-019 $32.04 357-223-020 $32.04 357-223-021 $32.04 357-223-022 $32.04 357-223-023 $32.04 357-223-024 $32.04 357-223-025 $32.04 357-223-026 $32.04 357-223-027 $32.04 357-223-028 $32.04 357-223-029 $32.04 357-224-001 $32.04 357-224-002 $32.04 357-224-003 $32.04 357-224-004 $32.04 357-224-005 $32.04 357-224-006 $32.04 357-224-007 $32.04 357-224-008 $32.04 357-224-009 $32.04 357-224-010 $32.04 357-224-011 $32.04 357-224-012 $32.04 357-224-014 $32.04 357-224-015 $32.04 357-224-016 $32.04 357-224-017 $32.04 357-224-018 $32.04 357-224-021 $32.04 357-224-022 $32.04 357-224-023 $32.04 357-224-024 $32.04 357-224-025 $32.04 357-224-026 $32.04 357-224-028 $32.04 357-224-032 $32.04 357-225-001 $32.04 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 357-225-002 $32.04 357-225-003 $32.04 357-225-006 $32.04 357-225-007 $32.04 357-225-008 $32.04 357-225-009 $32.04 357-225-010 $32.04 357-225-011 $32.04 357-225-012 $32.04 357-225-013 $32.04 357-225-014 $32.04 357-225-015 $32.04 357-225-016 $32.04 357-225-017 $32.04 357-225-018 $32.04 357-225-019 $32.04 357-225-020 $32.04 357-226-001 $32.04 357-226-002 $32.04 357-226-003 $32.04 357-226-004 $32.04 357-226-005 $32.04 357-226-006 $32.04 357-226-007 $32.04 357-226-008 $32.04 357-226-009 $32.04 357-226-010 $32.04 357-226-011 $32.04 357-231-001 $32.04 357-231-002 $32.04 357-231-003 $32.04 357-231-004 $32.04 357-231-005 $32.04 357-231-006 $32.04 357-231-007 $32.04 357-231-008 $32.04 357-231-009 $32.04 357-231-010 $32.04 357-231-011 $32.04 357-231-012 $32.04 357-231-013 $32.04 357-231-014 $32.04 357-231-015 $32.04 357-231-016 $32.04 357-231-017 $32.04 357-231-018 $32.04 357-231-019 $32.04 357-231-020 $32.04 357-231-023 $32.04 357-231-024 $32.04 357-231-025 $32.04 357-231-026 $32.04 357-231-028 $32.04 357-231-029 $32.04 357-231-030 $32.04 357-231-031 $48.06 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 357-231-032 $32.04 357-231-033 $32.04 357-231-034 $32.04 357-231-035 $32.04 357-231-036 $32.04 357-231-037 $32.04 357-231-038 $32.04 357-231-039 $32.04 357-231-040 $32.04 357-231-041 $32.04 357-231-042 $32.04 357-231-043 $32.04 357-231-044 $32.04 357-231-045 $32.04 357-232-001 $32.04 357-232-002 $32.04 357-232-003 $32.04 357-232-004 $32.04 357-232-005 $32.04 357-232-006 $32.04 357-232-007 $32.04 357-232-008 $32.04 357-232-009 $32.04 357-232-010 $32.04 357-241-001 $32.04 357-241-002 $32.04 357-241-003 $32.04 357-241-004 $32.04 357-241-005 $32.04 357-241-006 $32.04 357-241-007 $32.04 357-241-008 $32.04 357-241-009 $32.04 357-241-010 $32.04 357-241-011 $32.04 357-241-012 $32.04 357-241-013 $32.04 357-241-014 $32.04 357-241-015 $32.04 357-241-016 $32.04 357-241-017 $32.04 357-241-018 $32.04 357-241-019 $32.04 357-241-020 $32.04 357-241-021 $32.04 357-241-022 $32.04 357-241-023 $32.04 357-241-024 $32.04 357-242-001 $32.04 357-242-002 $32.04 357-242-003 $32.04 357-242-004 $32.04 357-242-005 $32.04 357-242-006 $32.04 357-242-007 $32.04 357-242-008 $32.04 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 357-242-009 $32.04 357-242-010 $32.04 357-242-011 $32.04 357-242-012 $32.04 357-242-013 $32.04 357-242-014 $32.04 357-242-015 $32.04 357-242-016 $32.04 357-242-017 $32.04 357-242-018 $32.04 357-242-019 $32.04 357-242-020 $32.04 357-242-021 $32.04 357-242-022 $32.04 357-242-023 $32.04 357-242-024 $32.04 357-242-025 $32.04 357-242-026 $32.04 357-242-027 $32.04 357-242-029 $32.04 357-242-030 $32.04 357-242-031 $32.04 357-242-032 $32.04 357-242-033 $32.04 357-242-034 $32.04 357-242-035 $32.04 357-242-036 $32.04 357-242-037 $32.04 357-242-038 $32.04 357-242-039 $32.04 357-243-001 $32.04 357-243-002 $32.04 357-243-003 $32.04 357-243-004 $32.04 357-243-005 $32.04 357-243-006 $32.04 357-243-007 $32.04 357-243-008 $32.04 357-243-009 $32.04 357-243-010 $32.04 357-243-011 $32.04 357-243-012 $32.04 357-243-013 $32.04 357-243-014 $32.04 357-243-015 $32.04 357-243-016 $32.04 357-243-017 $32.04 357-243-018 $32.04 357-243-019 $32.04 357-243-020 $32.04 357-243-021 $32.04 357-243-022 $32.04 357-243-023 $32.04 357-243-024 $32.04 357-243-025 $32.04 357-243-026 $32.04 67 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 652 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 38 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2854 LT LEVY CODE: Rodeo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 357-243-027 $32.04 357-243-028 $32.04 357-243-031 $32.04 357-251-001 $32.04 357-251-002 $32.04 357-251-003 $32.04 357-251-004 $32.04 357-251-005 $32.04 357-251-006 $32.04 357-251-007 $32.04 357-251-008 $32.04 357-251-009 $32.04 357-251-010 $32.04 357-251-011 $32.04 357-251-012 $32.04 357-251-013 $32.04 357-251-014 $32.04 357-251-015 $32.04 357-251-016 $32.04 357-251-017 $32.04 357-251-018 $32.04 357-251-019 $32.04 357-251-020 $32.04 357-251-021 $32.04 357-251-022 $32.04 357-251-023 $32.04 357-251-024 $32.04 357-251-025 $32.04 357-251-027 $32.04 357-251-028 $32.04 357-251-030 $32.04 357-251-031 $32.04 357-251-032 $32.04 357-251-033 $32.04 357-251-034 $32.04 357-251-035 $32.04 357-251-036 $32.04 357-251-037 $32.04 357-251-038 $32.04 357-251-039 $32.04 357-251-040 $32.04 357-251-041 $32.04 357-251-042 $32.04 357-251-043 $32.04 357-251-044 $32.04 357-251-045 $32.04 357-251-046 $32.04 357-251-047 $32.04 357-251-048 $32.04 357-251-049 $32.04 357-251-050 $32.04 357-252-001 $32.04 357-252-002 $32.04 357-252-003 $32.04 357-252-004 $32.04 357-252-005 $32.04 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 357-252-006 $32.04 357-252-007 $32.04 357-252-008 $32.04 357-252-009 $32.04 357-252-010 $32.04 357-252-011 $32.04 357-252-012 $32.04 357-252-013 $32.04 357-252-018 $32.04 357-252-019 $32.04 357-252-020 $32.04 357-252-021 $32.04 357-252-022 $32.04 357-252-023 $32.04 357-252-024 $32.04 357-260-004 $32.04 357-260-005 $16.02 357-260-006 $16.02 357-260-007 $16.02 357-260-008 $32.04 357-260-009 $32.04 357-260-010 $32.04 357-260-011 $32.04 357-260-012 $32.04 357-260-013 $32.04 357-260-014 $32.04 357-260-015 $32.04 357-260-016 $32.04 357-260-017 $32.04 357-260-018 $32.04 357-260-019 $32.04 357-260-020 $32.04 357-260-021 $32.04 357-260-022 $32.04 357-260-023 $32.04 357-260-024 $32.04 357-260-025 $32.04 357-260-028 $32.04 357-260-029 $32.04 357-260-030 $32.04 357-260-031 $32.04 357-260-032 $32.04 357-260-033 $32.04 357-260-034 $32.04 357-260-035 $32.04 357-260-036 $32.04 357-260-037 $32.04 357-260-038 $32.04 357-260-039 $32.04 357-260-040 $32.04 357-260-041 $32.04 357-260-042 $32.04 357-260-043 $32.04 357-260-044 $32.04 357-260-045 $32.04 357-260-046 $32.04 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 357-260-047 $32.04 357-260-048 $32.04 357-260-049 $32.04 357-260-050 $32.04 357-260-052 $96.12 357-260-061 $32.04 357-260-062 $32.04 357-260-063 $32.04 357-260-065 $32.04 357-260-066 $32.04 357-260-067 $32.04 357-260-068 $32.04 357-260-069 $16.02 357-260-070 $32.04 357-260-071 $16.02 357-271-001 $32.04 357-271-002 $32.04 357-271-003 $32.04 357-271-004 $32.04 357-271-005 $32.04 357-271-006 $32.04 357-271-007 $32.04 357-271-011 $32.04 357-272-001 $32.04 357-272-002 $32.04 357-272-003 $32.04 357-272-004 $32.04 357-272-005 $32.04 357-272-006 $32.04 357-272-007 $32.04 357-272-010 $32.04 357-272-011 $32.04 357-272-012 $32.04 357-272-013 $32.04 357-272-014 $32.04 357-272-015 $32.04 357-272-016 $32.04 357-272-017 $32.04 357-272-018 $32.04 357-273-001 $32.04 357-273-002 $32.04 357-273-003 $32.04 357-273-004 $32.04 357-273-005 $32.04 357-273-006 $32.04 357-273-007 $32.04 357-273-008 $32.04 357-273-009 $32.04 357-273-010 $32.04 357-273-011 $32.04 357-273-012 $32.04 357-273-013 $32.04 357-273-014 $32.04 357-273-015 $32.04 357-273-016 $32.04 357-273-017 $32.04 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 357-274-009 $32.04 357-274-010 $32.04 357-274-011 $32.04 357-274-012 $32.04 357-274-019 $32.04 357-274-020 $32.04 357-274-023 $32.04 357-274-024 $32.04 357-274-025 $32.04 357-274-026 $32.04 357-274-027 $32.04 357-274-028 $32.04 357-274-029 $32.04 357-274-034 $32.04 357-274-035 $32.04 357-274-046 $32.04 357-274-048 $32.04 357-274-049 $16.02 357-274-050 $16.02 357-281-001 $32.04 357-281-002 $32.04 357-281-003 $32.04 357-281-004 $32.04 357-281-005 $16.02 357-281-006 $32.04 357-281-007 $32.04 357-281-008 $32.04 357-281-009 $32.04 357-281-010 $32.04 357-281-011 $32.04 357-281-012 $32.04 357-281-013 $32.04 357-281-014 $32.04 357-281-015 $32.04 357-281-016 $32.04 357-281-019 $32.04 357-282-001 $32.04 357-282-002 $32.04 357-282-005 $32.04 357-282-006 $32.04 357-282-007 $32.04 357-282-008 $32.04 357-282-009 $32.04 357-282-010 $32.04 357-282-011 $32.04 357-282-012 $32.04 357-282-013 $32.04 357-282-014 $32.04 357-282-015 $32.04 357-282-016 $32.04 357-282-017 $32.04 357-282-018 $32.04 357-282-019 $32.04 357-282-020 $32.04 357-282-021 $32.04 357-282-022 $32.04 68 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 653 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 38 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2854 LT LEVY CODE: Rodeo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 357-282-023 $32.04 357-282-024 $32.04 357-282-025 $32.04 357-282-026 $32.04 357-282-027 $32.04 357-282-028 $32.04 357-282-029 $32.04 357-282-030 $32.04 357-282-031 $32.04 357-282-032 $32.04 357-282-033 $32.04 357-282-035 $32.04 357-282-036 $32.04 357-282-037 $32.04 357-282-038 $32.04 357-282-039 $32.04 357-283-001 $32.04 357-283-002 $32.04 357-283-003 $32.04 357-283-004 $32.04 357-283-005 $32.04 357-283-006 $32.04 357-283-007 $32.04 357-283-008 $32.04 357-283-009 $32.04 357-283-010 $32.04 357-291-001 $48.06 357-292-002 $32.04 357-292-003 $32.04 357-292-004 $32.04 357-292-005 $32.04 357-292-006 $32.04 357-292-007 $32.04 357-292-008 $32.04 357-292-009 $32.04 357-292-010 $32.04 357-292-011 $32.04 357-292-014 $32.04 357-292-015 $32.04 357-292-016 $32.04 357-292-017 $16.02 357-292-018 $32.04 357-293-001 $32.04 357-293-002 $32.04 357-293-003 $32.04 357-293-004 $32.04 357-293-005 $32.04 357-293-006 $32.04 357-293-007 $32.04 357-293-008 $32.04 357-293-009 $32.04 357-293-011 $32.04 357-310-005 $48.06 357-310-006 $48.06 357-363-001 $4,005.00 357-371-002 $32.04 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 357-371-005 $16.02 357-371-006 $16.02 357-371-007 $16.02 357-371-008 $16.02 357-371-012 $32.04 357-371-013 $16.02 357-371-014 $16.02 357-371-015 $16.02 357-371-016 $32.04 357-371-017 $32.04 357-371-018 $32.04 357-371-019 $32.04 357-371-020 $32.04 357-371-022 $32.04 357-371-023 $32.04 357-371-024 $32.04 357-371-025 $32.04 357-371-028 $32.04 357-371-029 $32.04 357-371-030 $32.04 357-371-031 $16.02 357-371-032 $32.04 358-080-001 $27.24 358-080-002 $27.24 358-080-003 $27.24 358-080-004 $27.24 358-080-005 $27.24 358-080-006 $27.24 358-080-007 $27.24 358-080-008 $27.24 358-080-009 $27.24 358-080-010 $27.24 358-080-011 $27.24 358-091-001 $27.24 358-091-002 $27.24 358-091-003 $27.24 358-091-004 $27.24 358-091-005 $27.24 358-091-006 $27.24 358-091-007 $27.24 358-091-008 $27.24 358-091-009 $27.24 358-091-010 $27.24 358-091-011 $27.24 358-091-012 $27.24 358-091-013 $27.24 358-091-014 $27.24 358-091-015 $27.24 358-091-016 $27.24 358-091-017 $27.24 358-091-018 $27.24 358-091-019 $27.24 358-092-001 $27.24 358-092-002 $27.24 358-092-003 $27.24 358-092-004 $27.24 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 358-092-005 $27.24 358-092-006 $27.24 358-092-007 $27.24 358-092-008 $27.24 358-092-009 $27.24 358-092-010 $27.24 358-092-011 $27.24 358-093-001 $27.24 358-093-002 $27.24 358-093-003 $27.24 358-093-004 $27.24 358-093-005 $27.24 358-093-006 $27.24 358-093-007 $27.24 358-093-008 $27.24 358-093-009 $27.24 358-093-010 $27.24 358-093-011 $27.24 358-101-001 $27.24 358-101-002 $27.24 358-101-003 $27.24 358-101-004 $27.24 358-101-005 $27.24 358-101-006 $27.24 358-101-007 $27.24 358-101-008 $27.24 358-101-009 $27.24 358-101-010 $27.24 358-101-011 $27.24 358-101-012 $27.24 358-101-013 $27.24 358-101-014 $27.24 358-101-015 $27.24 358-102-001 $27.24 358-102-002 $27.24 358-102-003 $27.24 358-102-004 $27.24 358-102-005 $27.24 358-102-006 $27.24 358-102-007 $27.24 358-102-008 $27.24 358-102-009 $27.24 358-102-010 $27.24 358-102-011 $27.24 358-102-012 $27.24 358-102-013 $27.24 358-102-014 $27.24 358-102-015 $27.24 358-102-016 $27.24 358-102-017 $27.24 358-103-001 $27.24 358-103-002 $27.24 358-103-003 $27.24 358-103-004 $27.24 358-103-005 $27.24 358-103-006 $27.24 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 358-103-007 $27.24 358-103-008 $27.24 358-103-009 $27.24 358-103-010 $27.24 358-103-011 $27.24 358-103-012 $27.24 358-103-013 $27.24 358-103-014 $27.24 358-103-015 $27.24 358-103-016 $27.24 358-103-017 $27.24 358-103-018 $27.24 358-103-019 $27.24 358-103-020 $27.24 358-103-021 $27.24 358-103-022 $27.24 358-103-023 $27.24 358-103-024 $27.24 358-103-025 $27.24 358-103-026 $27.24 358-103-027 $27.24 358-103-028 $27.24 358-104-001 $27.24 358-104-002 $27.24 358-104-003 $27.24 358-104-004 $27.24 358-104-005 $27.24 358-104-006 $27.24 358-104-007 $27.24 358-104-008 $27.24 358-104-009 $27.24 358-104-010 $27.24 358-104-011 $27.24 358-104-012 $27.24 358-104-013 $27.24 358-104-014 $27.24 358-104-015 $27.24 358-104-016 $27.24 358-104-017 $27.24 358-104-018 $27.24 358-104-019 $27.24 358-104-020 $27.24 358-104-021 $27.24 358-104-022 $27.24 358-111-001 $27.24 358-111-002 $27.24 358-111-003 $27.24 358-111-004 $27.24 358-111-005 $27.24 358-111-006 $27.24 358-111-007 $27.24 358-111-008 $27.24 358-111-009 $27.24 358-111-010 $27.24 358-111-011 $27.24 358-111-012 $27.24 69 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 654 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 38 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2854 LT LEVY CODE: Rodeo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 358-111-013 $27.24 358-111-014 $27.24 358-111-015 $27.24 358-111-016 $27.24 358-111-017 $27.24 358-111-018 $27.24 358-111-019 $27.24 358-111-020 $27.24 358-111-021 $27.24 358-111-022 $27.24 358-111-023 $27.24 358-111-024 $27.24 358-111-025 $27.24 358-111-026 $27.24 358-111-027 $27.24 358-111-028 $27.24 358-111-029 $27.24 358-111-030 $27.24 358-111-031 $27.24 358-111-032 $27.24 358-112-001 $27.24 358-112-002 $27.24 358-112-003 $27.24 358-112-004 $27.24 358-112-005 $27.24 358-112-006 $27.24 358-112-007 $27.24 358-112-008 $27.24 358-112-009 $27.24 358-112-010 $27.24 358-112-011 $27.24 358-112-012 $27.24 358-112-013 $27.24 358-112-014 $27.24 358-112-015 $27.24 358-112-016 $27.24 358-112-017 $27.24 358-112-018 $27.24 358-120-001 $27.24 358-120-002 $27.24 358-120-003 $27.24 358-120-004 $27.24 358-120-005 $27.24 358-120-006 $27.24 358-120-007 $27.24 358-120-008 $27.24 358-120-009 $27.24 358-120-010 $27.24 358-120-011 $27.24 358-120-012 $27.24 358-120-013 $27.24 358-120-014 $27.24 358-120-015 $27.24 358-120-016 $27.24 358-120-017 $27.24 358-120-018 $27.24 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 358-120-019 $27.24 358-120-020 $27.24 358-120-021 $27.24 358-120-022 $27.24 358-120-023 $27.24 358-151-001 $27.24 358-151-002 $27.24 358-151-003 $27.24 358-151-004 $27.24 358-151-005 $27.24 358-151-006 $27.24 358-151-007 $27.24 358-151-010 $27.24 358-151-011 $27.24 358-151-012 $27.24 358-151-013 $27.24 358-151-014 $27.24 358-151-015 $27.24 358-151-016 $27.24 358-151-017 $27.24 358-151-019 $27.24 358-151-020 $27.24 358-151-021 $27.24 358-151-022 $27.24 358-151-023 $27.24 358-151-024 $27.24 358-151-026 $27.24 358-151-027 $27.24 358-151-028 $27.24 358-152-001 $27.24 358-152-002 $27.24 358-152-003 $27.24 358-152-004 $27.24 358-152-005 $27.24 358-152-006 $27.24 358-152-007 $27.24 358-152-008 $27.24 358-152-009 $27.24 358-152-010 $27.24 358-152-011 $27.24 358-152-012 $27.24 358-152-013 $27.24 358-152-014 $27.24 358-152-015 $27.24 358-152-016 $27.24 358-152-017 $27.24 358-152-018 $27.24 358-152-019 $27.24 358-152-020 $27.24 358-152-021 $27.24 358-152-022 $27.24 358-152-023 $27.24 358-152-024 $27.24 358-152-025 $27.24 358-161-001 $27.24 358-161-002 $27.24 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 358-161-003 $27.24 358-161-004 $27.24 358-161-005 $27.24 358-161-006 $27.24 358-161-007 $27.24 358-162-001 $27.24 358-162-002 $27.24 358-162-003 $27.24 358-162-004 $27.24 358-162-005 $27.24 358-162-006 $27.24 358-162-007 $27.24 358-162-008 $27.24 358-162-009 $27.24 358-162-010 $27.24 358-163-001 $27.24 358-163-002 $27.24 358-163-003 $27.24 358-163-004 $27.24 358-163-005 $27.24 358-163-006 $27.24 358-163-007 $27.24 358-163-008 $27.24 358-163-009 $27.24 358-163-013 $27.24 358-163-014 $27.24 358-163-015 $27.24 358-163-016 $27.24 358-163-017 $27.24 358-163-018 $27.24 358-163-019 $27.24 358-163-020 $27.24 358-163-021 $27.24 358-163-022 $27.24 358-163-023 $27.24 358-163-024 $27.24 358-163-025 $27.24 358-163-026 $27.24 358-163-027 $27.24 358-163-028 $27.24 358-163-029 $27.24 358-163-030 $27.24 358-163-031 $27.24 358-163-032 $27.24 358-163-033 $27.24 358-163-034 $27.24 358-163-036 $27.24 358-164-001 $27.24 358-164-002 $27.24 358-164-003 $27.24 358-164-004 $27.24 358-164-005 $27.24 358-164-006 $27.24 358-164-007 $27.24 358-164-008 $27.24 358-164-009 $27.24 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 358-164-010 $27.24 358-164-011 $27.24 358-164-012 $27.24 358-171-001 $27.24 358-171-002 $27.24 358-171-003 $27.24 358-171-004 $27.24 358-171-005 $27.24 358-171-006 $27.24 358-171-007 $27.24 358-171-008 $27.24 358-171-009 $27.24 358-171-010 $27.24 358-171-011 $27.24 358-171-012 $27.24 358-171-013 $27.24 358-171-014 $27.24 358-171-015 $27.24 358-172-001 $27.24 358-172-002 $27.24 358-173-001 $27.24 358-173-002 $27.24 358-173-003 $27.24 358-173-004 $27.24 358-173-005 $27.24 358-173-006 $27.24 358-173-007 $27.24 358-173-008 $27.24 358-173-009 $27.24 358-173-010 $27.24 358-173-011 $27.24 358-173-012 $27.24 358-173-013 $27.24 358-173-014 $27.24 358-173-015 $27.24 358-173-016 $27.24 358-173-017 $27.24 358-173-018 $27.24 358-173-019 $27.24 358-173-020 $27.24 358-174-001 $27.24 358-174-002 $27.24 358-174-003 $27.24 358-174-004 $27.24 358-174-005 $27.24 358-174-006 $27.24 358-174-007 $27.24 358-174-008 $27.24 358-174-009 $27.24 358-174-010 $27.24 358-181-001 $27.24 358-181-002 $27.24 358-181-003 $27.24 358-181-004 $27.24 358-181-005 $27.24 358-181-006 $27.24 70 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 655 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 38 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2854 LT LEVY CODE: Rodeo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 358-181-007 $27.24 358-181-008 $27.24 358-181-009 $27.24 358-181-010 $27.24 358-181-011 $27.24 358-181-012 $27.24 358-181-013 $27.24 358-181-014 $27.24 358-181-015 $27.24 358-181-016 $27.24 358-181-017 $27.24 358-181-018 $27.24 358-181-019 $27.24 358-181-020 $27.24 358-181-021 $27.24 358-181-022 $27.24 358-181-023 $27.24 358-181-024 $27.24 358-181-025 $27.24 358-181-026 $27.24 358-181-027 $27.24 358-181-028 $27.24 358-181-029 $27.24 358-181-030 $27.24 358-181-031 $27.24 358-181-032 $27.24 358-181-033 $27.24 358-181-034 $27.24 358-181-037 $27.24 358-181-038 $27.24 358-181-039 $27.24 358-181-040 $27.24 358-181-042 $27.24 358-181-043 $27.24 358-182-001 $27.24 358-182-002 $27.24 358-182-003 $27.24 358-182-004 $27.24 358-182-005 $27.24 358-182-006 $27.24 358-182-007 $27.24 358-182-008 $27.24 358-182-009 $27.24 358-182-010 $27.24 358-182-011 $27.24 358-182-012 $27.24 358-182-013 $27.24 358-183-001 $27.24 358-183-002 $27.24 358-183-003 $27.24 358-183-004 $27.24 358-183-005 $27.24 358-183-006 $27.24 358-183-007 $27.24 358-183-008 $27.24 358-183-009 $27.24 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 358-183-010 $27.24 358-183-011 $27.24 358-183-012 $27.24 358-183-013 $27.24 358-183-014 $27.24 358-183-015 $27.24 358-183-016 $27.24 358-184-001 $27.24 358-184-002 $27.24 358-184-003 $27.24 358-185-001 $27.24 358-185-002 $27.24 358-185-003 $27.24 358-185-004 $27.24 358-185-005 $27.24 358-185-006 $27.24 358-191-002 $27.24 358-191-003 $27.24 358-191-004 $27.24 358-191-005 $27.24 358-191-006 $27.24 358-191-007 $27.24 358-191-008 $27.24 358-191-009 $27.24 358-191-010 $27.24 358-191-011 $27.24 358-191-012 $27.24 358-191-013 $27.24 358-191-014 $27.24 358-191-015 $27.24 358-191-016 $27.24 358-191-017 $27.24 358-191-018 $27.24 358-191-019 $27.24 358-191-020 $27.24 358-191-021 $27.24 358-191-022 $27.24 358-191-023 $27.24 358-191-024 $27.24 358-191-025 $27.24 358-191-026 $27.24 358-191-027 $27.24 358-191-028 $27.24 358-191-029 $27.24 358-191-030 $27.24 358-191-031 $27.24 358-191-032 $27.24 358-191-033 $27.24 358-191-034 $27.24 358-191-035 $27.24 358-191-036 $27.24 358-191-037 $27.24 358-201-001 $27.24 358-201-002 $27.24 358-201-003 $27.24 358-201-004 $27.24 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 358-201-005 $27.24 358-201-006 $27.24 358-201-007 $27.24 358-201-008 $27.24 358-201-009 $27.24 358-201-010 $27.24 358-201-011 $27.24 358-201-012 $27.24 358-202-001 $27.24 358-202-002 $27.24 358-202-003 $27.24 358-202-004 $27.24 358-202-005 $27.24 358-202-006 $27.24 358-202-007 $27.24 358-202-008 $27.24 358-202-009 $27.24 358-202-010 $27.24 358-202-011 $27.24 358-202-012 $27.24 358-202-013 $27.24 358-202-014 $27.24 358-202-015 $27.24 358-202-016 $27.24 358-202-017 $27.24 358-202-018 $27.24 358-202-019 $27.24 358-202-020 $27.24 358-202-021 $27.24 358-202-022 $27.24 358-203-001 $27.24 358-203-002 $27.24 358-203-003 $27.24 358-203-004 $27.24 358-203-005 $27.24 358-203-006 $27.24 358-203-007 $27.24 358-203-008 $27.24 358-203-009 $27.24 358-203-010 $27.24 358-203-011 $27.24 358-203-012 $27.24 358-204-001 $27.24 358-204-002 $27.24 358-204-003 $27.24 358-204-004 $27.24 358-204-005 $27.24 358-204-006 $27.24 358-204-007 $27.24 358-204-008 $27.24 358-204-009 $27.24 358-204-010 $27.24 358-204-011 $27.24 358-204-012 $27.24 358-204-013 $27.24 358-204-014 $27.24 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 358-204-015 $27.24 358-204-016 $27.24 358-204-017 $27.24 358-204-018 $27.24 358-204-019 $27.24 358-204-020 $27.24 358-204-021 $27.24 358-204-022 $27.24 358-211-001 $27.24 358-211-002 $27.24 358-211-003 $27.24 358-211-004 $27.24 358-211-005 $27.24 358-211-006 $27.24 358-211-007 $27.24 358-211-008 $27.24 358-211-009 $27.24 358-211-010 $27.24 358-211-011 $27.24 358-211-012 $27.24 358-211-013 $27.24 358-211-014 $27.24 358-211-015 $27.24 358-211-016 $27.24 358-211-017 $27.24 358-211-018 $27.24 358-211-019 $27.24 358-211-020 $27.24 358-211-021 $27.24 358-211-022 $27.24 358-211-023 $27.24 358-211-024 $27.24 358-211-025 $27.24 358-211-026 $27.24 358-211-027 $27.24 358-211-028 $27.24 358-211-029 $27.24 358-212-001 $27.24 358-212-002 $27.24 358-212-003 $27.24 358-212-004 $27.24 358-212-005 $27.24 358-212-006 $27.24 358-212-007 $27.24 358-212-008 $27.24 358-212-009 $27.24 358-212-010 $27.24 358-212-011 $27.24 358-212-012 $27.24 358-212-013 $27.24 358-212-014 $27.24 358-212-015 $27.24 358-212-016 $27.24 358-212-017 $27.24 358-212-018 $27.24 358-212-019 $27.24 71 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 656 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 38 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2854 LT LEVY CODE: Rodeo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 358-212-020 $27.24 358-212-021 $27.24 358-212-022 $27.24 358-212-023 $27.24 358-212-024 $27.24 358-212-025 $27.24 358-212-026 $27.24 358-212-027 $27.24 358-212-028 $27.24 358-212-029 $27.24 358-212-030 $27.24 358-212-031 $27.24 358-212-032 $27.24 358-212-033 $27.24 358-213-001 $27.24 358-213-002 $27.24 358-213-003 $27.24 358-213-004 $27.24 358-213-005 $27.24 358-213-006 $27.24 358-213-007 $27.24 358-213-008 $27.24 358-213-009 $27.24 358-213-010 $27.24 358-213-011 $27.24 358-213-012 $27.24 358-213-013 $27.24 358-221-001 $27.24 358-221-002 $27.24 358-221-003 $27.24 358-221-004 $27.24 358-221-005 $27.24 358-221-006 $27.24 358-221-007 $27.24 358-221-008 $27.24 358-221-009 $27.24 358-221-010 $27.24 358-221-011 $27.24 358-222-001 $27.24 358-222-002 $27.24 358-222-003 $27.24 358-223-001 $27.24 358-223-002 $27.24 358-223-003 $27.24 358-223-004 $27.24 358-223-005 $27.24 358-223-006 $27.24 358-223-007 $27.24 358-223-008 $27.24 358-223-009 $27.24 358-223-010 $27.24 358-223-011 $27.24 358-223-012 $27.24 358-223-013 $27.24 358-223-014 $27.24 358-223-015 $27.24 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 358-223-016 $27.24 358-231-001 $27.24 358-231-002 $27.24 358-231-003 $27.24 358-231-004 $27.24 358-231-005 $27.24 358-231-006 $27.24 358-231-007 $27.24 358-231-008 $27.24 358-231-009 $27.24 358-231-010 $27.24 358-232-001 $27.24 358-232-002 $27.24 358-232-003 $27.24 358-232-004 $27.24 358-232-005 $27.24 358-232-006 $27.24 358-233-001 $27.24 358-233-002 $27.24 358-233-003 $27.24 358-233-004 $27.24 358-233-005 $27.24 358-233-006 $27.24 358-233-007 $27.24 358-233-008 $27.24 358-233-009 $27.24 358-233-010 $27.24 358-234-001 $27.24 358-234-002 $27.24 358-234-003 $27.24 358-234-004 $27.24 358-234-005 $27.24 358-234-006 $27.24 358-234-007 $27.24 358-234-008 $27.24 358-234-009 $27.24 358-234-010 $27.24 358-234-011 $27.24 358-234-012 $27.24 358-234-013 $27.24 358-234-014 $27.24 358-234-015 $27.24 358-234-016 $27.24 358-234-017 $27.24 358-235-001 $27.24 358-235-002 $27.24 358-235-003 $27.24 358-235-004 $27.24 358-235-005 $27.24 358-235-006 $27.24 358-235-007 $27.24 358-235-008 $27.24 358-235-009 $27.24 358-235-010 $27.24 358-235-011 $27.24 358-235-012 $27.24 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 358-241-001 $27.24 358-241-002 $27.24 358-241-003 $27.24 358-241-004 $27.24 358-241-005 $27.24 358-241-006 $27.24 358-241-007 $27.24 358-241-008 $27.24 358-241-009 $27.24 358-241-010 $27.24 358-241-011 $27.24 358-241-012 $27.24 358-241-013 $27.24 358-241-014 $27.24 358-241-015 $27.24 358-241-016 $27.24 358-241-017 $27.24 358-242-001 $27.24 358-242-002 $27.24 358-242-003 $27.24 358-242-004 $27.24 358-242-005 $27.24 358-242-006 $27.24 358-242-007 $27.24 358-242-008 $27.24 358-242-009 $27.24 358-242-010 $27.24 358-242-011 $27.24 358-242-012 $27.24 358-242-013 $27.24 358-242-014 $27.24 358-242-015 $27.24 358-251-001 $27.24 358-251-002 $27.24 358-251-003 $27.24 358-251-004 $27.24 358-251-005 $27.24 358-251-006 $27.24 358-252-001 $27.24 358-252-002 $27.24 358-252-003 $27.24 358-252-004 $27.24 358-252-005 $27.24 358-252-006 $27.24 358-252-007 $27.24 358-252-008 $27.24 358-252-009 $27.24 358-252-010 $27.24 358-252-011 $27.24 358-252-012 $27.24 358-253-001 $27.24 358-253-002 $27.24 358-253-003 $27.24 358-253-004 $27.24 358-253-005 $27.24 358-253-006 $27.24 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 358-253-007 $27.24 358-253-008 $27.24 358-253-009 $27.24 358-253-010 $27.24 358-253-011 $27.24 358-254-001 $27.24 358-254-002 $27.24 358-254-003 $27.24 358-254-004 $27.24 358-254-005 $27.24 358-254-006 $27.24 358-254-007 $27.24 358-254-008 $27.24 358-254-009 $27.24 358-254-010 $27.24 358-254-011 $27.24 358-254-012 $27.24 358-254-013 $27.24 358-254-014 $27.24 358-254-015 $27.24 358-261-001 $27.24 358-261-002 $27.24 358-261-003 $27.24 358-261-004 $27.24 358-261-005 $27.24 358-261-006 $27.24 358-261-007 $27.24 358-261-008 $27.24 358-261-009 $27.24 358-261-010 $27.24 358-261-011 $27.24 358-261-012 $27.24 358-261-013 $27.24 358-261-014 $27.24 358-261-015 $27.24 358-261-016 $27.24 358-261-017 $27.24 358-261-018 $27.24 358-261-019 $27.24 358-261-020 $27.24 358-261-021 $27.24 358-261-022 $27.24 358-262-001 $27.24 358-262-002 $27.24 358-262-003 $27.24 358-262-004 $27.24 358-262-005 $27.24 358-262-006 $27.24 358-262-007 $27.24 358-263-001 $27.24 358-263-002 $27.24 358-264-001 $27.24 358-264-002 $27.24 358-264-003 $27.24 358-264-004 $27.24 358-264-005 $27.24 72 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 657 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 38 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2854 LT LEVY CODE: Rodeo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 358-264-006 $27.24 358-264-007 $27.24 358-264-008 $27.24 358-264-009 $27.24 358-264-010 $27.24 358-264-011 $27.24 358-264-012 $27.24 358-264-013 $27.24 358-264-014 $27.24 358-264-015 $27.24 358-264-016 $27.24 358-264-017 $27.24 358-264-018 $27.24 358-264-019 $27.24 358-264-020 $27.24 358-264-021 $27.24 358-264-022 $27.24 358-264-023 $27.24 358-264-024 $27.24 358-264-025 $27.24 358-264-026 $27.24 358-264-027 $27.24 358-264-028 $27.24 358-265-001 $27.24 358-265-002 $27.24 358-265-003 $27.24 358-265-004 $27.24 358-265-005 $27.24 358-265-006 $27.24 358-265-007 $27.24 358-265-008 $27.24 358-265-009 $27.24 358-265-010 $27.24 358-271-001 $27.24 358-271-002 $27.24 358-271-003 $27.24 358-271-004 $27.24 358-271-005 $27.24 358-271-006 $27.24 358-271-007 $27.24 358-271-008 $27.24 358-271-009 $27.24 358-271-010 $27.24 358-271-011 $27.24 358-271-012 $27.24 358-271-013 $27.24 358-271-014 $27.24 358-271-015 $27.24 358-271-016 $27.24 358-271-017 $27.24 358-271-018 $27.24 358-271-019 $27.24 358-271-020 $27.24 358-271-021 $27.24 358-271-022 $27.24 358-271-023 $27.24 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 358-271-024 $27.24 358-271-025 $27.24 358-271-026 $27.24 358-271-027 $27.24 358-271-028 $27.24 358-271-029 $27.24 358-271-030 $27.24 358-271-031 $27.24 358-271-032 $27.24 358-271-033 $27.24 358-271-034 $27.24 358-271-035 $27.24 358-271-036 $27.24 358-271-037 $27.24 358-271-038 $27.24 358-271-039 $27.24 358-271-040 $27.24 358-271-041 $27.24 358-271-042 $27.24 358-271-043 $27.24 358-271-044 $27.24 358-272-001 $27.24 358-272-002 $27.24 358-272-003 $27.24 358-272-004 $27.24 358-272-005 $27.24 358-291-001 $27.24 358-291-002 $27.24 358-291-003 $27.24 358-291-004 $27.24 358-291-005 $27.24 358-291-006 $27.24 358-291-007 $27.24 358-291-008 $27.24 358-291-009 $27.24 358-291-010 $27.24 358-291-011 $27.24 358-291-012 $27.24 358-291-013 $27.24 358-291-014 $27.24 358-291-015 $27.24 358-291-016 $27.24 358-291-017 $27.24 358-291-018 $27.24 358-291-019 $27.24 358-292-001 $27.24 358-292-002 $27.24 358-292-003 $27.24 358-292-004 $27.24 358-292-005 $27.24 358-292-006 $27.24 358-292-007 $27.24 358-293-001 $27.24 358-293-002 $27.24 358-293-003 $27.24 358-293-004 $27.24 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 358-293-005 $27.24 358-293-006 $27.24 358-293-007 $27.24 358-293-008 $27.24 358-293-009 $27.24 358-293-010 $27.24 358-293-011 $27.24 358-293-012 $27.24 358-293-013 $27.24 358-293-014 $27.24 358-293-015 $27.24 358-293-016 $27.24 358-293-017 $27.24 358-293-018 $27.24 358-293-019 $27.24 358-293-020 $27.24 358-293-021 $27.24 358-293-022 $27.24 358-293-023 $27.24 358-293-024 $27.24 358-293-025 $27.24 358-293-026 $27.24 358-293-027 $27.24 358-293-028 $27.24 358-293-029 $27.24 358-293-030 $27.24 358-293-031 $27.24 358-293-032 $27.24 358-293-033 $27.24 358-293-034 $27.24 358-293-035 $27.24 358-293-036 $27.24 358-293-037 $27.24 358-293-038 $27.24 358-293-039 $27.24 358-293-040 $27.24 358-293-041 $27.24 358-293-042 $27.24 358-293-043 $27.24 358-293-044 $27.24 358-302-001 $27.24 358-302-002 $27.24 358-302-003 $27.24 358-302-004 $27.24 358-302-005 $27.24 358-302-006 $27.24 358-302-007 $27.24 358-302-008 $27.24 358-302-009 $27.24 358-302-010 $27.24 358-302-011 $27.24 358-302-014 $27.24 358-302-015 $27.24 358-302-016 $27.24 358-302-017 $27.24 358-302-018 $27.24 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 358-302-019 $27.24 358-302-020 $27.24 358-302-021 $27.24 358-302-022 $27.24 358-303-001 $27.24 358-303-002 $27.24 358-303-003 $27.24 358-303-004 $27.24 358-310-001 $27.24 358-310-002 $27.24 358-310-003 $27.24 358-310-004 $27.24 358-310-005 $27.24 358-310-006 $27.24 358-310-007 $27.24 358-310-008 $27.24 358-310-009 $27.24 358-310-010 $27.24 358-310-011 $27.24 358-310-012 $27.24 358-310-013 $27.24 358-310-014 $27.24 358-310-015 $27.24 358-311-001 $27.24 358-311-002 $27.24 358-311-003 $27.24 358-311-004 $27.24 358-311-005 $27.24 358-311-006 $27.24 358-311-007 $27.24 358-311-008 $27.24 358-311-009 $27.24 358-311-010 $27.24 358-311-011 $27.24 358-311-012 $27.24 358-311-013 $27.24 358-311-014 $27.24 358-311-015 $27.24 358-311-016 $27.24 358-311-017 $27.24 358-311-018 $27.24 358-311-019 $27.24 358-311-020 $27.24 358-311-021 $27.24 358-311-022 $27.24 358-311-023 $27.24 358-311-024 $27.24 358-311-025 $27.24 358-311-026 $27.24 358-311-027 $27.24 358-311-028 $27.24 358-311-029 $27.24 358-311-030 $27.24 358-311-031 $27.24 358-311-032 $27.24 358-311-033 $27.24 73 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 658 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 38 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2854 LT LEVY CODE: Rodeo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 358-311-034 $27.24 358-311-035 $27.24 358-311-036 $27.24 358-311-037 $27.24 358-311-038 $27.24 358-311-039 $27.24 358-311-040 $27.24 358-311-041 $27.24 358-311-042 $27.24 358-311-043 $27.24 358-311-044 $27.24 358-311-045 $27.24 358-311-046 $27.24 358-311-047 $27.24 358-311-048 $27.24 358-311-049 $27.24 358-311-050 $27.24 358-311-051 $27.24 358-311-052 $27.24 358-311-053 $27.24 358-311-054 $27.24 358-311-055 $27.24 358-311-056 $27.24 358-311-057 $27.24 358-311-059 $27.24 358-311-060 $27.24 358-311-061 $27.24 358-311-062 $27.24 358-311-063 $27.24 358-311-064 $27.24 358-311-065 $27.24 358-311-066 $27.24 358-311-067 $27.24 358-311-068 $27.24 358-311-069 $27.24 358-311-070 $27.24 358-311-071 $27.24 358-311-072 $27.24 358-311-073 $27.24 358-311-074 $27.24 358-311-075 $27.24 358-311-076 $27.24 358-311-077 $27.24 358-311-078 $27.24 358-312-001 $27.24 358-312-002 $27.24 358-312-003 $27.24 358-312-004 $27.24 358-312-005 $27.24 358-312-006 $27.24 358-312-007 $27.24 358-312-008 $27.24 358-312-009 $27.24 358-312-010 $27.24 358-312-011 $27.24 358-312-012 $27.24 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 358-312-014 $27.24 358-312-015 $27.24 358-312-016 $27.24 358-312-017 $27.24 358-312-018 $27.24 358-312-019 $27.24 358-312-020 $27.24 358-312-021 $27.24 358-312-022 $27.24 358-312-023 $27.24 358-312-024 $27.24 358-312-025 $27.24 358-312-026 $27.24 358-312-027 $27.24 358-312-028 $27.24 358-312-029 $27.24 358-312-030 $27.24 358-312-031 $27.24 358-312-032 $27.24 358-312-033 $27.24 358-312-034 $27.24 358-312-035 $27.24 358-312-036 $27.24 357-061-028 $32.04 357-063-017 $32.04 357-063-018 $16.02 357-042-028 $32.04 357-072-030 $32.04 357-131-021 $32.04 357-232-012 $32.04 357-132-017 $96.12 357-132-018 $32.04 357-132-019 $32.04 357-111-036 $32.04 357-371-033 $32.04 357-371-034 $32.04 2556Total Parcels: $84,41 4.82 Total Assessment: 74 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 659 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 42 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2867 L2 LEVY CODE: California Skyline - Bay Point Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 099-170-001 $210.00 099-170-002 $210.00 099-170-003 $210.00 099-170-004 $210.00 099-170-005 $210.00 099-170-006 $210.00 099-170-007 $210.00 099-170-008 $210.00 099-170-009 $210.00 099-170-010 $210.00 099-170-011 $210.00 099-170-012 $210.00 099-170-013 $210.00 099-170-014 $210.00 099-170-015 $210.00 099-170-016 $210.00 099-170-017 $210.00 099-170-018 $210.00 099-170-019 $210.00 099-170-020 $210.00 099-170-021 $210.00 099-170-022 $210.00 099-170-023 $210.00 099-170-024 $210.00 099-170-025 $210.00 099-170-026 $210.00 099-170-027 $210.00 099-170-028 $210.00 099-170-029 $210.00 099-170-030 $210.00 099-170-031 $210.00 099-170-032 $210.00 099-170-033 $210.00 099-170-034 $210.00 099-170-035 $210.00 099-170-036 $210.00 099-170-037 $210.00 099-170-038 $210.00 099-170-039 $210.00 099-170-040 $210.00 099-170-041 $210.00 099-170-042 $210.00 099-170-043 $210.00 099-170-044 $210.00 099-170-045 $210.00 099-170-046 $210.00 099-170-047 $210.00 099-170-048 $210.00 099-170-049 $210.00 099-170-050 $210.00 099-170-051 $210.00 099-170-052 $210.00 099-170-053 $210.00 099-170-054 $210.00 099-170-055 $210.00 099-170-056 $210.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 099-170-057 $210.00 099-170-058 $210.00 099-170-059 $210.00 099-170-060 $210.00 099-170-061 $210.00 099-170-062 $210.00 099-170-063 $210.00 099-170-066 $210.00 099-170-067 $210.00 099-170-068 $210.00 099-170-069 $210.00 099-170-070 $210.00 099-170-071 $210.00 099-170-072 $210.00 099-170-073 $210.00 099-170-074 $210.00 099-170-075 $210.00 099-170-076 $210.00 099-180-001 $210.00 099-180-002 $210.00 099-180-003 $210.00 099-180-004 $210.00 099-180-005 $210.00 099-180-006 $210.00 099-180-007 $210.00 099-180-008 $210.00 099-180-009 $210.00 099-180-010 $210.00 099-180-011 $210.00 099-180-012 $210.00 099-180-013 $210.00 099-180-014 $210.00 099-180-015 $210.00 099-180-016 $210.00 099-180-017 $210.00 099-180-018 $210.00 099-180-019 $210.00 099-180-020 $210.00 099-180-021 $210.00 099-180-022 $210.00 099-180-023 $210.00 099-180-024 $210.00 099-180-025 $210.00 099-180-026 $210.00 099-180-027 $210.00 099-180-028 $210.00 099-180-029 $210.00 099-180-030 $210.00 099-180-031 $210.00 099-180-032 $210.00 099-180-033 $210.00 099-180-034 $210.00 099-180-035 $210.00 099-180-036 $210.00 099-180-037 $210.00 099-180-038 $210.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 099-180-039 $210.00 099-180-040 $210.00 099-180-041 $210.00 099-180-042 $210.00 099-180-043 $210.00 099-180-044 $210.00 099-180-045 $210.00 099-180-046 $210.00 099-180-047 $210.00 099-180-048 $210.00 099-180-049 $210.00 099-180-050 $210.00 099-180-051 $210.00 099-180-052 $210.00 099-180-053 $210.00 099-180-054 $210.00 099-180-055 $210.00 099-180-056 $210.00 099-180-057 $210.00 099-180-058 $210.00 099-180-059 $210.00 099-180-060 $210.00 099-180-061 $210.00 099-180-062 $210.00 099-180-063 $210.00 099-180-064 $210.00 099-180-065 $210.00 099-180-066 $210.00 099-180-067 $210.00 099-180-068 $210.00 099-180-069 $210.00 099-180-070 $210.00 099-180-071 $210.00 099-180-072 $210.00 099-180-073 $210.00 099-180-074 $210.00 099-180-075 $210.00 099-180-076 $210.00 099-180-077 $210.00 099-180-078 $210.00 099-180-079 $210.00 099-180-080 $210.00 099-180-081 $210.00 099-180-082 $210.00 099-180-083 $210.00 099-180-084 $210.00 099-180-085 $210.00 099-180-086 $210.00 099-180-087 $210.00 099-180-088 $210.00 099-180-089 $210.00 099-180-090 $210.00 099-180-091 $210.00 099-180-092 $210.00 099-180-093 $210.00 099-180-094 $210.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 099-190-001 $210.00 099-190-002 $210.00 099-190-003 $210.00 099-190-004 $210.00 099-190-005 $210.00 099-190-006 $210.00 099-190-007 $210.00 099-190-008 $210.00 099-190-009 $210.00 099-190-010 $210.00 099-190-011 $210.00 099-190-012 $210.00 099-190-013 $210.00 099-190-014 $210.00 099-190-015 $210.00 099-190-016 $210.00 099-190-017 $210.00 099-190-018 $210.00 099-190-019 $210.00 099-190-020 $210.00 099-190-021 $210.00 099-190-022 $210.00 099-190-023 $210.00 099-190-024 $210.00 099-190-025 $210.00 099-190-026 $210.00 099-190-027 $210.00 099-190-028 $210.00 099-190-029 $210.00 099-190-030 $210.00 099-190-031 $210.00 099-190-032 $210.00 099-190-033 $210.00 099-190-034 $210.00 099-190-035 $210.00 099-190-036 $210.00 099-190-037 $210.00 099-190-038 $210.00 099-190-039 $210.00 099-190-040 $210.00 099-190-041 $210.00 099-190-042 $210.00 099-190-043 $210.00 099-190-044 $210.00 099-190-045 $210.00 099-190-046 $210.00 099-190-047 $210.00 099-190-048 $210.00 099-190-049 $210.00 099-190-050 $210.00 099-190-051 $210.00 099-190-052 $210.00 099-190-053 $210.00 099-190-054 $210.00 099-190-055 $210.00 099-190-056 $210.00 75 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 660 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 42 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2867 L2 LEVY CODE: California Skyline - Bay Point Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 099-190-057 $210.00 099-190-058 $210.00 099-190-059 $210.00 099-190-060 $210.00 099-190-061 $210.00 099-190-062 $210.00 099-190-063 $210.00 099-190-064 $210.00 099-190-065 $210.00 099-190-066 $210.00 099-190-067 $210.00 099-190-068 $210.00 099-190-069 $210.00 099-190-070 $210.00 099-190-071 $210.00 099-190-072 $210.00 099-190-073 $210.00 099-190-074 $210.00 099-190-075 $210.00 099-190-076 $210.00 099-190-077 $210.00 099-190-078 $210.00 099-190-079 $210.00 099-190-080 $210.00 099-190-081 $210.00 099-190-082 $210.00 099-190-083 $210.00 099-190-084 $210.00 099-190-085 $210.00 099-190-086 $210.00 099-190-087 $210.00 099-190-088 $210.00 099-190-089 $210.00 099-190-090 $210.00 099-190-091 $210.00 099-190-092 $210.00 099-190-093 $210.00 099-190-094 $210.00 099-190-095 $210.00 099-190-096 $210.00 099-190-097 $210.00 099-190-098 $210.00 099-190-099 $210.00 099-190-100 $210.00 099-190-101 $210.00 099-190-102 $210.00 099-190-103 $210.00 099-190-104 $210.00 099-190-105 $210.00 099-190-106 $210.00 099-190-107 $210.00 099-190-108 $210.00 099-190-109 $210.00 099-190-110 $210.00 099-190-111 $210.00 099-190-112 $210.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 099-190-113 $210.00 099-190-114 $210.00 099-190-115 $210.00 099-190-116 $210.00 099-190-117 $210.00 099-190-118 $210.00 099-190-119 $210.00 099-190-120 $210.00 099-190-121 $210.00 099-190-122 $210.00 099-190-123 $210.00 099-190-124 $210.00 099-190-125 $210.00 099-190-126 $210.00 099-190-127 $210.00 099-190-128 $210.00 099-190-129 $210.00 099-200-001 $210.00 099-200-002 $210.00 099-200-003 $210.00 099-200-004 $210.00 099-200-005 $210.00 099-200-006 $210.00 099-200-007 $210.00 099-200-008 $210.00 099-200-009 $210.00 099-200-010 $210.00 099-200-011 $210.00 099-200-012 $210.00 099-200-013 $210.00 099-200-014 $210.00 099-200-015 $210.00 099-200-016 $210.00 099-200-017 $210.00 099-200-018 $210.00 099-200-019 $210.00 099-200-020 $210.00 099-200-021 $210.00 099-200-022 $210.00 099-200-023 $210.00 099-200-024 $210.00 099-200-025 $210.00 099-200-026 $210.00 099-200-027 $210.00 099-200-028 $210.00 099-200-029 $210.00 099-200-030 $210.00 099-200-031 $210.00 099-200-032 $210.00 099-200-033 $210.00 099-200-034 $210.00 099-200-035 $210.00 099-200-036 $210.00 099-200-037 $210.00 099-200-038 $210.00 099-200-039 $210.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 099-200-040 $210.00 099-200-041 $210.00 099-200-043 $210.00 099-200-044 $210.00 099-200-045 $210.00 099-200-046 $210.00 099-200-047 $210.00 343Total Parcels: $72,030.00 Total Assessment: 76 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 661 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 45 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2869 L4 LEVY CODE: Alamo Villas Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 197-430-001 $120.00 197-430-002 $120.00 197-430-003 $120.00 197-430-004 $120.00 197-430-005 $120.00 197-430-006 $120.00 197-430-007 $120.00 197-430-008 $120.00 197-430-009 $120.00 197-430-010 $120.00 10Total Parcels: $1,200.00 Total Assessment: 77 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 662 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 48 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2872 L7 LEVY CODE: Mrack Road - Camino Tassajara Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 220-391-008 $490.00 220-391-009 $490.00 220-391-010 $490.00 220-391-011 $490.00 220-391-012 $490.00 220-391-013 $490.00 220-391-014 $490.00 220-391-015 $490.00 220-391-016 $490.00 220-391-018 $490.00 220-391-019 $490.00 220-391-020 $490.00 220-391-021 $490.00 220-391-022 $490.00 220-391-023 $490.00 220-391-024 $490.00 220-391-025 $490.00 220-391-026 $490.00 220-391-027 $490.00 220-391-028 $490.00 220-391-029 $490.00 220-391-030 $490.00 220-391-031 $490.00 220-391-032 $490.00 220-391-033 $490.00 220-391-034 $490.00 220-391-035 $490.00 220-391-036 $490.00 220-391-037 $490.00 220-391-038 $490.00 220-391-039 $490.00 220-391-040 $490.00 220-391-041 $490.00 220-391-042 $490.00 220-391-043 $490.00 220-391-045 $490.00 220-391-046 $490.00 220-391-047 $490.00 220-391-048 $490.00 220-391-049 $490.00 220-391-050 $490.00 220-391-051 $490.00 220-391-052 $490.00 220-401-001 $490.00 220-401-002 $490.00 220-401-003 $490.00 220-401-004 $490.00 220-401-005 $490.00 220-401-006 $490.00 220-401-007 $490.00 220-401-008 $490.00 220-401-009 $490.00 220-401-010 $490.00 220-401-011 $490.00 220-401-012 $490.00 220-401-013 $490.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 220-401-014 $490.00 220-401-015 $490.00 220-401-016 $490.00 220-401-017 $490.00 220-401-018 $490.00 220-401-019 $490.00 220-401-020 $490.00 220-401-021 $490.00 220-401-022 $490.00 220-401-023 $490.00 220-401-024 $490.00 220-401-025 $490.00 220-080-035 $490.00 220-080-037 $490.00 220-080-038 $490.00 220-080-040 $490.00 72Total Parcels: $35,280.00 Total Assessment: 78 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 663 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 54 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2876 M3 LEVY CODE: Alamo Country - Alamo Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 187-560-003 $386.62 187-560-004 $386.62 187-560-005 $386.62 187-560-006 $386.62 187-560-007 $386.62 187-560-008 $386.62 187-560-009 $386.62 187-560-010 $386.62 187-560-011 $386.62 187-560-012 $386.62 187-560-013 $386.62 187-560-014 $386.62 187-560-015 $386.62 187-560-016 $386.62 187-560-017 $386.62 187-560-019 $386.62 187-560-020 $386.62 187-570-001 $386.62 187-570-002 $386.62 187-570-003 $386.62 187-570-004 $386.62 187-570-005 $386.62 187-570-006 $386.62 187-570-007 $386.62 187-570-008 $386.62 187-580-001 $386.62 187-580-002 $386.62 187-580-003 $386.62 187-580-004 $386.62 187-580-005 $386.62 187-580-006 $386.62 187-580-007 $386.62 187-580-008 $386.62 187-580-009 $386.62 187-580-010 $386.62 187-580-011 $386.62 187-580-012 $386.62 187-580-013 $386.62 187-580-014 $386.62 187-580-015 $386.62 187-580-016 $386.62 187-580-017 $386.62 187-580-018 $386.62 187-580-019 $386.62 187-580-020 $386.62 187-580-021 $386.62 187-580-022 $386.62 187-580-023 $386.62 187-580-024 $386.62 187-580-025 $386.62 187-580-026 $386.62 187-580-027 $386.62 187-580-028 $386.62 187-580-029 $386.62 187-580-030 $386.62 187-580-031 $386.62 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 187-580-032 $386.62 187-580-033 $386.62 187-580-034 $386.62 187-580-035 $386.62 187-590-001 $386.62 187-590-002 $386.62 187-590-003 $386.62 187-590-004 $386.62 187-590-005 $386.62 187-590-006 $386.62 187-590-007 $386.62 187-590-008 $386.62 187-590-009 $386.62 187-590-010 $386.62 187-590-011 $386.62 187-590-012 $386.62 187-590-013 $386.62 187-590-014 $386.62 187-590-015 $386.62 187-590-016 $386.62 187-590-017 $386.62 187-590-018 $386.62 187-590-021 $386.62 187-590-022 $386.62 187-590-023 $386.62 187-590-024 $386.62 187-590-025 $386.62 187-590-026 $386.62 187-590-027 $386.62 187-590-028 $386.62 187-590-029 $386.62 187-590-030 $386.62 187-590-031 $386.62 187-590-032 $386.62 187-590-033 $386.62 187-590-034 $386.62 187-590-035 $386.62 93Total Parcels: $35,955.66 Total Assessment: 79 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 664 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 57 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2877 M4 LEVY CODE: Pacific Waterways - Discovery Bay Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-291-002 $231.00 011-291-003 $231.00 011-291-004 $231.00 011-291-005 $231.00 011-291-006 $231.00 011-291-007 $231.00 011-291-008 $231.00 011-291-009 $231.00 011-291-010 $231.00 011-291-011 $231.00 011-291-012 $231.00 011-291-013 $231.00 011-291-014 $231.00 011-291-015 $231.00 011-291-016 $231.00 011-291-017 $231.00 011-291-018 $231.00 011-291-019 $231.00 011-291-020 $231.00 011-291-021 $231.00 011-291-022 $231.00 011-291-023 $231.00 011-291-024 $231.00 011-291-025 $231.00 011-291-026 $231.00 011-291-027 $231.00 011-291-028 $231.00 011-291-029 $231.00 011-291-030 $231.00 011-291-031 $231.00 011-291-032 $231.00 011-291-033 $231.00 011-291-034 $231.00 011-291-035 $231.00 011-291-036 $231.00 011-291-037 $231.00 011-291-038 $231.00 011-291-039 $231.00 011-291-040 $231.00 011-291-041 $231.00 011-291-042 $231.00 011-291-043 $231.00 011-291-044 $231.00 011-291-045 $231.00 011-291-046 $231.00 011-291-047 $231.00 011-291-048 $231.00 011-291-049 $231.00 011-291-050 $231.00 011-291-051 $231.00 011-291-052 $231.00 011-291-053 $231.00 011-291-054 $231.00 011-291-055 $231.00 011-291-056 $231.00 011-291-057 $231.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-291-058 $231.00 011-291-059 $231.00 011-291-060 $231.00 011-291-061 $231.00 011-291-062 $231.00 011-291-063 $231.00 011-291-064 $231.00 011-291-065 $231.00 011-302-001 $231.00 011-302-002 $231.00 011-302-003 $231.00 011-302-004 $231.00 011-302-005 $231.00 011-302-006 $231.00 011-302-007 $231.00 011-302-008 $231.00 011-302-009 $231.00 011-302-010 $231.00 011-302-011 $231.00 011-302-012 $231.00 011-302-013 $231.00 011-302-014 $231.00 011-302-015 $231.00 011-302-016 $231.00 011-302-017 $231.00 011-302-018 $231.00 011-302-019 $231.00 011-302-020 $231.00 011-302-021 $231.00 011-302-022 $231.00 011-302-023 $231.00 011-302-024 $231.00 011-302-025 $231.00 011-302-026 $231.00 011-302-027 $231.00 011-302-028 $231.00 011-302-029 $231.00 011-302-030 $231.00 011-302-031 $231.00 011-302-032 $231.00 011-302-033 $231.00 011-302-034 $231.00 011-302-035 $231.00 011-302-036 $231.00 011-302-037 $231.00 011-302-038 $231.00 011-302-039 $231.00 011-302-040 $231.00 011-302-041 $231.00 011-316-001 $231.00 011-316-002 $231.00 011-316-003 $231.00 011-316-004 $231.00 011-316-005 $231.00 011-316-006 $231.00 011-316-007 $231.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-316-008 $231.00 011-316-009 $231.00 011-316-010 $231.00 011-316-011 $231.00 011-316-012 $231.00 011-316-013 $231.00 011-316-014 $231.00 011-316-015 $231.00 011-316-016 $231.00 011-316-017 $231.00 011-316-018 $231.00 011-316-019 $231.00 011-316-020 $231.00 011-316-021 $231.00 011-316-022 $231.00 011-316-023 $231.00 011-316-024 $231.00 011-316-025 $231.00 011-316-026 $231.00 011-316-027 $231.00 011-316-028 $231.00 011-316-029 $231.00 011-316-030 $231.00 011-316-031 $231.00 011-316-032 $231.00 011-316-033 $231.00 011-316-034 $231.00 011-316-035 $231.00 011-316-036 $231.00 011-316-037 $231.00 011-316-038 $231.00 011-316-039 $231.00 011-316-040 $231.00 011-316-041 $231.00 011-316-042 $231.00 011-323-001 $231.00 011-323-002 $231.00 011-323-003 $231.00 011-323-004 $231.00 011-323-005 $231.00 011-323-006 $231.00 011-323-007 $231.00 011-323-008 $231.00 011-323-009 $231.00 011-323-010 $231.00 011-323-011 $231.00 011-323-012 $231.00 011-323-013 $231.00 011-323-014 $231.00 011-323-015 $231.00 011-323-016 $231.00 011-323-017 $231.00 011-323-018 $231.00 011-323-019 $231.00 011-323-020 $231.00 011-323-021 $231.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-323-022 $231.00 011-323-023 $231.00 011-323-024 $231.00 011-323-025 $231.00 011-323-026 $231.00 011-323-027 $231.00 011-323-028 $231.00 011-323-029 $231.00 011-323-030 $231.00 011-323-031 $231.00 011-323-032 $231.00 011-323-033 $231.00 011-323-034 $231.00 011-323-035 $231.00 011-323-036 $231.00 011-323-037 $231.00 011-323-038 $231.00 011-323-039 $231.00 011-323-040 $231.00 011-323-041 $231.00 011-323-042 $231.00 011-323-043 $231.00 011-323-044 $231.00 011-323-045 $231.00 011-323-046 $231.00 011-323-047 $231.00 011-323-048 $231.00 011-323-049 $231.00 011-323-050 $231.00 011-323-051 $231.00 011-323-052 $231.00 011-323-053 $231.00 011-323-054 $231.00 011-323-055 $231.00 011-323-056 $231.00 011-323-057 $231.00 011-323-058 $231.00 011-323-059 $231.00 011-323-060 $231.00 011-323-061 $231.00 011-323-062 $231.00 011-323-063 $231.00 011-323-064 $231.00 011-331-001 $231.00 011-331-002 $231.00 011-331-003 $231.00 011-331-004 $231.00 011-331-005 $231.00 011-331-006 $231.00 011-331-007 $231.00 011-331-008 $231.00 011-331-009 $231.00 011-331-010 $231.00 011-331-011 $231.00 011-331-012 $231.00 011-331-013 $231.00 80 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 665 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 57 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2877 M4 LEVY CODE: Pacific Waterways - Discovery Bay Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-331-014 $231.00 011-331-015 $231.00 011-331-016 $231.00 011-331-017 $231.00 011-331-018 $231.00 011-331-019 $231.00 011-331-020 $231.00 011-331-021 $231.00 011-331-022 $231.00 011-331-023 $231.00 011-331-024 $231.00 011-331-025 $231.00 011-331-026 $231.00 011-331-027 $231.00 011-331-028 $231.00 011-331-029 $231.00 011-331-030 $231.00 011-331-031 $231.00 011-331-032 $231.00 011-331-033 $231.00 011-331-034 $231.00 011-331-035 $231.00 011-331-036 $231.00 011-331-037 $231.00 011-331-038 $231.00 011-331-039 $231.00 011-331-040 $231.00 011-331-041 $231.00 011-331-042 $231.00 011-331-043 $231.00 011-331-044 $231.00 011-331-045 $231.00 011-331-046 $231.00 011-331-047 $231.00 011-331-048 $231.00 011-331-049 $231.00 011-331-050 $231.00 011-331-051 $231.00 011-331-052 $231.00 011-331-053 $231.00 011-331-054 $231.00 011-331-055 $231.00 011-331-056 $231.00 011-331-057 $231.00 011-331-058 $231.00 011-331-059 $231.00 011-331-060 $231.00 011-331-061 $231.00 011-331-062 $231.00 011-331-063 $231.00 011-331-064 $231.00 011-331-065 $231.00 011-331-066 $231.00 011-331-067 $231.00 011-331-068 $231.00 011-331-069 $231.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-331-070 $231.00 011-331-071 $231.00 011-331-072 $231.00 011-331-073 $231.00 011-331-074 $231.00 011-331-075 $231.00 011-331-076 $231.00 011-331-077 $231.00 011-331-078 $231.00 011-331-079 $231.00 011-331-080 $231.00 011-331-081 $231.00 011-331-082 $231.00 011-331-083 $231.00 011-331-084 $231.00 011-331-085 $231.00 011-331-086 $231.00 011-331-087 $231.00 011-331-088 $231.00 011-331-089 $231.00 011-331-090 $231.00 011-331-091 $231.00 011-331-092 $231.00 011-331-093 $231.00 011-331-094 $231.00 011-331-095 $231.00 011-331-096 $231.00 011-331-097 $231.00 011-340-001 $231.00 011-340-002 $231.00 011-340-003 $231.00 011-340-004 $231.00 011-340-005 $231.00 011-340-006 $231.00 011-340-007 $231.00 011-340-008 $231.00 011-340-009 $231.00 011-340-010 $231.00 011-340-011 $231.00 011-340-012 $231.00 011-340-013 $231.00 011-340-014 $231.00 011-340-015 $231.00 011-340-016 $231.00 011-340-017 $231.00 011-340-018 $231.00 011-340-019 $231.00 011-340-020 $231.00 011-340-021 $231.00 011-340-022 $231.00 011-340-023 $231.00 011-340-024 $231.00 011-340-025 $231.00 011-340-026 $231.00 011-340-027 $231.00 011-340-028 $231.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-340-029 $231.00 011-340-030 $231.00 011-340-031 $231.00 011-340-032 $231.00 011-340-033 $231.00 011-340-034 $231.00 011-340-035 $231.00 011-340-036 $231.00 011-340-037 $231.00 011-340-038 $231.00 011-340-039 $231.00 011-340-040 $231.00 011-340-041 $231.00 011-340-042 $231.00 011-340-043 $231.00 011-340-044 $231.00 011-340-045 $231.00 011-340-046 $231.00 011-340-047 $231.00 011-340-048 $231.00 011-340-049 $231.00 011-340-050 $231.00 011-340-051 $231.00 011-340-052 $231.00 011-340-053 $231.00 011-340-054 $231.00 011-340-055 $231.00 011-340-056 $231.00 011-340-057 $231.00 011-340-058 $231.00 011-340-059 $231.00 011-340-060 $231.00 011-340-061 $231.00 011-340-062 $231.00 011-340-063 $231.00 011-340-064 $231.00 011-340-065 $231.00 011-340-069 $231.00 011-340-070 $231.00 011-340-071 $231.00 011-340-072 $231.00 011-340-073 $231.00 011-340-074 $231.00 011-340-075 $231.00 380Total Parcels: $87,780.00 Total Assessment: 81 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 666 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 61 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2833 M7 LEVY CODE: Discovery Bay West Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-350-009 $900.00 011-360-001 $150.00 011-360-002 $150.00 011-360-003 $150.00 011-360-004 $150.00 011-360-005 $150.00 011-360-006 $150.00 011-360-007 $150.00 011-360-008 $150.00 011-360-009 $150.00 011-360-010 $150.00 011-360-011 $150.00 011-360-012 $150.00 011-360-013 $150.00 011-360-014 $150.00 011-360-015 $150.00 011-360-016 $150.00 011-360-017 $150.00 011-360-018 $150.00 011-360-019 $150.00 011-360-020 $150.00 011-360-021 $150.00 011-360-022 $150.00 011-360-023 $150.00 011-360-024 $150.00 011-360-025 $150.00 011-360-026 $150.00 011-360-027 $150.00 011-360-028 $150.00 011-360-029 $150.00 011-360-030 $150.00 011-360-031 $150.00 011-360-032 $150.00 011-360-033 $150.00 011-360-034 $150.00 011-360-035 $150.00 011-360-036 $150.00 011-360-037 $150.00 011-360-038 $150.00 011-360-039 $150.00 011-360-040 $150.00 011-360-041 $150.00 011-360-042 $150.00 011-360-043 $150.00 011-360-044 $150.00 011-360-045 $150.00 011-360-046 $150.00 011-360-047 $150.00 011-360-048 $150.00 011-360-049 $150.00 011-360-050 $150.00 011-360-051 $150.00 011-360-052 $150.00 011-360-053 $150.00 011-360-054 $150.00 011-360-055 $150.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-360-056 $150.00 011-360-057 $150.00 011-370-001 $150.00 011-370-002 $150.00 011-370-003 $150.00 011-370-004 $150.00 011-370-005 $150.00 011-370-006 $150.00 011-370-007 $150.00 011-370-008 $150.00 011-370-009 $150.00 011-370-010 $150.00 011-370-011 $150.00 011-370-012 $150.00 011-370-013 $150.00 011-370-014 $150.00 011-370-015 $150.00 011-370-016 $150.00 011-370-017 $150.00 011-370-018 $150.00 011-370-019 $150.00 011-370-020 $150.00 011-370-021 $150.00 011-370-022 $150.00 011-370-023 $150.00 011-370-024 $150.00 011-370-025 $150.00 011-370-026 $150.00 011-370-027 $150.00 011-370-028 $150.00 011-370-029 $150.00 011-370-030 $150.00 011-370-031 $150.00 011-370-032 $150.00 011-370-033 $150.00 011-370-034 $150.00 011-370-035 $150.00 011-370-036 $150.00 011-370-037 $150.00 011-370-038 $150.00 011-370-039 $150.00 011-370-040 $150.00 011-370-041 $150.00 011-370-042 $150.00 011-370-043 $150.00 011-370-044 $150.00 011-370-045 $150.00 011-370-046 $150.00 011-370-047 $150.00 011-370-048 $150.00 011-370-049 $150.00 011-370-050 $150.00 011-370-051 $150.00 011-370-052 $150.00 011-370-053 $150.00 011-370-054 $150.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-370-055 $150.00 011-370-056 $150.00 011-370-057 $150.00 011-370-058 $150.00 011-370-059 $150.00 011-370-060 $150.00 011-370-061 $150.00 011-370-062 $150.00 011-370-063 $150.00 011-370-064 $150.00 011-370-065 $150.00 011-370-066 $150.00 011-370-067 $150.00 011-370-068 $150.00 011-370-069 $150.00 011-370-070 $150.00 011-370-071 $150.00 011-370-072 $150.00 011-370-073 $150.00 011-370-074 $150.00 011-370-075 $150.00 011-370-076 $150.00 011-370-077 $150.00 011-381-001 $150.00 011-381-002 $150.00 011-381-003 $150.00 011-381-004 $150.00 011-381-005 $150.00 011-381-006 $150.00 011-381-007 $150.00 011-381-008 $150.00 011-381-009 $150.00 011-381-010 $150.00 011-381-011 $150.00 011-381-012 $150.00 011-381-013 $150.00 011-381-014 $150.00 011-381-015 $150.00 011-381-016 $150.00 011-381-017 $150.00 011-381-018 $150.00 011-381-019 $150.00 011-381-020 $150.00 011-381-021 $150.00 011-381-022 $150.00 011-381-023 $150.00 011-381-024 $150.00 011-381-025 $150.00 011-381-026 $150.00 011-381-027 $150.00 011-381-028 $150.00 011-381-029 $150.00 011-381-030 $150.00 011-381-031 $150.00 011-381-032 $150.00 011-381-033 $150.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-381-034 $150.00 011-381-035 $150.00 011-381-036 $150.00 011-381-037 $150.00 011-381-038 $150.00 011-381-039 $150.00 011-381-040 $150.00 011-381-041 $150.00 011-381-042 $150.00 011-381-043 $150.00 011-381-044 $150.00 011-381-045 $150.00 011-381-046 $150.00 011-381-047 $150.00 011-381-048 $150.00 011-381-049 $150.00 011-381-050 $150.00 011-381-051 $150.00 011-381-052 $150.00 011-381-053 $150.00 011-381-054 $150.00 011-381-055 $150.00 011-381-056 $150.00 011-381-057 $150.00 011-381-058 $150.00 011-390-001 $150.00 011-390-002 $150.00 011-390-003 $150.00 011-390-004 $150.00 011-390-005 $150.00 011-390-006 $150.00 011-390-007 $150.00 011-390-008 $150.00 011-390-009 $150.00 011-390-010 $150.00 011-390-011 $150.00 011-390-012 $150.00 011-390-013 $150.00 011-390-014 $150.00 011-390-015 $150.00 011-390-016 $150.00 011-390-017 $150.00 011-390-018 $150.00 011-390-019 $150.00 011-390-020 $150.00 011-390-021 $150.00 011-390-022 $150.00 011-390-023 $150.00 011-390-024 $150.00 011-390-025 $150.00 011-390-026 $150.00 011-390-027 $150.00 011-390-028 $150.00 011-390-029 $150.00 011-390-030 $150.00 011-390-031 $150.00 82 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 667 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 61 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2833 M7 LEVY CODE: Discovery Bay West Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-390-032 $150.00 011-390-033 $150.00 011-390-034 $150.00 011-390-035 $150.00 011-390-036 $150.00 011-390-037 $150.00 011-390-038 $150.00 011-390-039 $150.00 011-390-040 $150.00 011-390-041 $150.00 011-390-042 $150.00 011-390-043 $150.00 011-390-044 $150.00 011-390-045 $150.00 011-390-046 $150.00 011-390-047 $150.00 011-390-048 $150.00 011-390-049 $150.00 011-390-050 $150.00 011-390-051 $150.00 011-390-052 $150.00 011-390-053 $150.00 011-390-054 $150.00 011-390-055 $150.00 011-390-056 $150.00 011-390-057 $150.00 011-390-058 $150.00 011-390-059 $150.00 011-390-060 $150.00 011-390-061 $150.00 011-390-062 $150.00 011-390-063 $150.00 011-390-064 $150.00 011-390-065 $150.00 011-390-066 $150.00 011-390-067 $150.00 011-390-068 $150.00 011-390-069 $150.00 011-390-070 $150.00 011-390-071 $150.00 011-400-001 $150.00 011-400-002 $150.00 011-400-003 $150.00 011-400-004 $150.00 011-400-005 $150.00 011-400-006 $150.00 011-400-007 $150.00 011-400-008 $150.00 011-400-009 $150.00 011-400-010 $150.00 011-400-011 $150.00 011-400-012 $150.00 011-400-013 $150.00 011-400-014 $150.00 011-400-015 $150.00 011-400-016 $150.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-400-017 $150.00 011-400-018 $150.00 011-400-019 $150.00 011-400-020 $150.00 011-400-021 $150.00 011-400-022 $150.00 011-400-023 $150.00 011-400-024 $150.00 011-400-025 $150.00 011-400-026 $150.00 011-400-027 $150.00 011-400-028 $150.00 011-400-029 $150.00 011-400-030 $150.00 011-400-031 $150.00 011-400-032 $150.00 011-400-033 $150.00 011-400-034 $150.00 011-400-035 $150.00 011-400-036 $150.00 011-400-037 $150.00 011-400-038 $150.00 011-400-039 $150.00 011-400-040 $150.00 011-400-041 $150.00 011-400-042 $150.00 011-400-043 $150.00 011-400-044 $150.00 011-400-045 $150.00 011-400-046 $150.00 011-400-047 $150.00 011-400-048 $150.00 011-400-049 $150.00 011-400-050 $150.00 011-400-051 $150.00 011-400-052 $150.00 011-400-053 $150.00 011-400-054 $150.00 011-400-055 $150.00 011-400-056 $150.00 011-400-057 $150.00 011-400-058 $150.00 011-400-059 $150.00 011-400-060 $150.00 011-400-061 $150.00 011-400-062 $150.00 011-400-063 $150.00 011-400-064 $150.00 011-400-065 $150.00 011-400-066 $150.00 011-400-067 $150.00 011-400-068 $150.00 011-400-069 $150.00 011-400-070 $150.00 011-400-071 $150.00 011-400-072 $150.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-400-073 $150.00 011-400-074 $150.00 011-400-075 $150.00 011-400-076 $150.00 011-400-077 $150.00 011-400-078 $150.00 011-400-079 $150.00 011-400-080 $150.00 011-400-081 $150.00 011-400-082 $150.00 011-400-083 $150.00 011-400-084 $150.00 011-400-085 $150.00 011-400-086 $150.00 011-400-087 $150.00 011-400-088 $150.00 011-400-089 $150.00 011-400-090 $150.00 011-400-091 $150.00 011-400-092 $150.00 011-400-093 $150.00 011-400-094 $150.00 011-400-095 $150.00 011-400-096 $150.00 011-400-097 $150.00 011-400-098 $150.00 011-400-099 $150.00 011-410-001 $150.00 011-410-002 $150.00 011-410-003 $150.00 011-410-004 $150.00 011-410-005 $150.00 011-410-006 $150.00 011-410-007 $150.00 011-410-008 $150.00 011-410-009 $150.00 011-410-010 $150.00 011-410-011 $150.00 011-410-012 $150.00 011-410-013 $150.00 011-410-014 $150.00 011-410-015 $150.00 011-410-016 $150.00 011-410-017 $150.00 011-410-018 $150.00 011-410-019 $150.00 011-410-020 $150.00 011-410-021 $150.00 011-410-022 $150.00 011-410-023 $150.00 011-410-024 $150.00 011-410-025 $150.00 011-410-026 $150.00 011-410-027 $150.00 011-410-028 $150.00 011-410-029 $150.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-410-030 $150.00 011-410-031 $150.00 011-410-032 $150.00 011-410-033 $150.00 011-410-034 $150.00 011-410-035 $150.00 011-410-036 $150.00 011-410-037 $150.00 011-410-038 $150.00 011-410-039 $150.00 011-410-040 $150.00 011-410-041 $150.00 011-410-042 $150.00 011-410-043 $150.00 011-410-044 $150.00 011-410-045 $150.00 011-410-046 $150.00 011-410-047 $150.00 011-410-048 $150.00 011-410-049 $150.00 011-410-050 $150.00 011-410-051 $150.00 011-410-052 $150.00 011-410-053 $150.00 011-410-054 $150.00 011-410-055 $150.00 011-410-056 $150.00 011-410-057 $150.00 011-410-058 $150.00 011-410-059 $150.00 011-410-060 $150.00 011-410-061 $150.00 011-410-062 $150.00 011-410-063 $150.00 011-410-064 $150.00 011-410-065 $150.00 011-410-066 $150.00 011-410-067 $150.00 011-410-068 $150.00 011-410-069 $150.00 011-410-070 $150.00 011-410-071 $150.00 011-410-072 $150.00 011-410-073 $150.00 011-410-074 $150.00 011-410-075 $150.00 011-410-076 $150.00 011-410-077 $150.00 011-421-001 $150.00 011-421-002 $150.00 011-421-003 $150.00 011-421-004 $150.00 011-421-005 $150.00 011-421-006 $150.00 011-421-007 $150.00 011-421-008 $150.00 83 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 668 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 61 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2833 M7 LEVY CODE: Discovery Bay West Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-421-009 $150.00 011-421-010 $150.00 011-421-011 $150.00 011-421-012 $150.00 011-421-013 $150.00 011-421-014 $150.00 011-421-015 $150.00 011-421-016 $150.00 011-421-017 $150.00 011-421-018 $150.00 011-421-019 $150.00 011-421-020 $150.00 011-421-021 $150.00 011-421-022 $150.00 011-421-023 $150.00 011-421-024 $150.00 011-421-025 $150.00 011-421-026 $150.00 011-421-027 $150.00 011-421-028 $150.00 011-421-029 $150.00 011-421-030 $150.00 011-421-031 $150.00 011-421-032 $150.00 011-421-033 $150.00 011-421-034 $150.00 011-421-035 $150.00 011-421-036 $150.00 011-421-037 $150.00 011-421-038 $150.00 011-421-039 $150.00 011-421-040 $150.00 011-421-041 $150.00 011-421-042 $150.00 011-421-043 $150.00 011-421-044 $150.00 011-430-001 $150.00 011-430-002 $150.00 011-430-003 $150.00 011-430-004 $150.00 011-430-005 $150.00 011-430-006 $150.00 011-430-007 $150.00 011-430-008 $150.00 011-430-009 $150.00 011-430-010 $150.00 011-430-011 $150.00 011-430-012 $150.00 011-430-013 $150.00 011-430-014 $150.00 011-430-015 $150.00 011-430-016 $150.00 011-430-017 $150.00 011-430-018 $150.00 011-430-019 $150.00 011-430-020 $150.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-430-021 $150.00 011-430-022 $150.00 011-430-023 $150.00 011-430-024 $150.00 011-430-025 $150.00 011-430-026 $150.00 011-430-027 $150.00 011-430-028 $150.00 011-430-029 $150.00 011-430-030 $150.00 011-430-031 $150.00 011-430-032 $150.00 011-430-033 $150.00 011-430-034 $150.00 011-430-035 $150.00 011-430-036 $150.00 011-430-037 $150.00 011-430-038 $150.00 011-430-039 $150.00 011-430-040 $150.00 011-430-041 $150.00 011-430-042 $150.00 011-430-043 $150.00 011-430-044 $150.00 011-430-045 $150.00 011-430-046 $150.00 011-430-047 $150.00 011-430-048 $150.00 011-430-049 $150.00 011-430-050 $150.00 011-430-051 $150.00 011-430-052 $150.00 011-430-053 $150.00 011-430-054 $150.00 011-430-055 $150.00 011-430-056 $150.00 011-430-057 $150.00 011-430-058 $150.00 011-430-059 $150.00 011-430-060 $150.00 011-430-061 $150.00 011-430-062 $150.00 011-430-063 $150.00 011-430-064 $150.00 011-430-065 $150.00 011-430-066 $150.00 011-430-067 $150.00 011-430-068 $150.00 011-430-069 $150.00 011-430-070 $150.00 011-430-071 $150.00 011-430-072 $150.00 011-430-073 $150.00 011-430-074 $150.00 011-430-075 $150.00 011-430-076 $150.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-430-077 $150.00 011-430-078 $150.00 011-430-079 $150.00 011-430-080 $150.00 011-441-001 $150.00 011-441-002 $150.00 011-441-003 $150.00 011-441-004 $150.00 011-441-005 $150.00 011-441-006 $150.00 011-441-007 $150.00 011-441-008 $150.00 011-441-009 $150.00 011-441-010 $150.00 011-441-011 $150.00 011-441-012 $150.00 011-441-013 $150.00 011-441-014 $150.00 011-441-015 $150.00 011-441-016 $150.00 011-441-017 $150.00 011-441-018 $150.00 011-441-019 $150.00 011-441-020 $150.00 011-441-021 $150.00 011-441-022 $150.00 011-441-023 $150.00 011-441-024 $150.00 011-441-025 $150.00 011-441-026 $150.00 011-441-027 $150.00 011-441-028 $150.00 011-441-029 $150.00 011-441-030 $150.00 011-441-031 $150.00 011-441-032 $150.00 011-441-033 $150.00 011-441-034 $150.00 011-441-035 $150.00 011-441-036 $150.00 011-441-037 $150.00 011-441-038 $150.00 011-441-039 $150.00 011-441-040 $150.00 011-441-041 $150.00 011-441-042 $150.00 011-441-043 $150.00 011-441-044 $150.00 011-441-045 $150.00 011-441-046 $150.00 011-441-047 $150.00 011-441-048 $150.00 011-441-049 $150.00 011-441-050 $150.00 011-450-001 $150.00 011-450-002 $150.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-450-003 $150.00 011-450-004 $150.00 011-450-005 $150.00 011-450-006 $150.00 011-450-007 $150.00 011-450-008 $150.00 011-450-009 $150.00 011-450-010 $150.00 011-450-011 $150.00 011-450-012 $150.00 011-450-013 $150.00 011-450-014 $150.00 011-450-015 $150.00 011-450-016 $150.00 011-450-017 $150.00 011-450-018 $150.00 011-450-019 $150.00 011-450-020 $150.00 011-450-021 $150.00 011-450-022 $150.00 011-450-023 $150.00 011-450-024 $150.00 011-450-025 $150.00 011-450-026 $150.00 011-450-027 $150.00 011-450-028 $150.00 011-450-029 $150.00 011-450-030 $150.00 011-450-031 $150.00 011-450-032 $150.00 011-450-033 $150.00 011-450-034 $150.00 011-450-035 $150.00 011-450-036 $150.00 011-450-037 $150.00 011-450-038 $150.00 011-450-039 $150.00 011-450-040 $150.00 011-450-041 $150.00 011-450-042 $150.00 011-450-043 $150.00 011-450-044 $150.00 011-450-045 $150.00 011-450-046 $150.00 011-450-047 $150.00 011-450-048 $150.00 011-450-049 $150.00 011-450-050 $150.00 011-450-051 $150.00 011-450-052 $150.00 011-450-053 $150.00 011-450-054 $150.00 011-450-055 $150.00 011-460-001 $150.00 011-460-002 $150.00 011-460-003 $150.00 84 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 669 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 61 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2833 M7 LEVY CODE: Discovery Bay West Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-460-004 $150.00 011-460-005 $150.00 011-460-006 $150.00 011-460-007 $150.00 011-460-008 $150.00 011-460-009 $150.00 011-460-010 $150.00 011-460-011 $150.00 011-460-012 $150.00 011-460-013 $150.00 011-460-014 $150.00 011-460-015 $150.00 011-460-016 $150.00 011-460-017 $150.00 011-460-018 $150.00 011-460-019 $150.00 011-460-020 $150.00 011-460-021 $150.00 011-460-022 $150.00 011-460-023 $150.00 011-460-024 $150.00 011-460-025 $150.00 011-460-026 $150.00 011-460-027 $150.00 011-460-028 $150.00 011-460-029 $150.00 011-460-030 $150.00 011-460-031 $150.00 011-460-032 $150.00 011-460-033 $150.00 011-460-034 $150.00 011-460-035 $150.00 011-460-036 $150.00 011-460-037 $150.00 011-460-038 $150.00 011-460-039 $150.00 011-460-040 $150.00 011-460-041 $150.00 011-460-042 $150.00 011-460-043 $150.00 011-460-044 $150.00 011-460-045 $150.00 011-460-046 $150.00 011-460-047 $150.00 011-460-048 $150.00 011-460-049 $150.00 011-490-001 $150.00 011-490-002 $150.00 011-490-003 $150.00 011-490-004 $150.00 011-490-005 $150.00 011-490-006 $150.00 011-490-007 $150.00 011-490-008 $150.00 011-490-009 $150.00 011-490-010 $150.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-490-011 $150.00 011-490-012 $150.00 011-490-013 $150.00 011-490-014 $150.00 011-490-015 $150.00 011-490-016 $150.00 011-490-017 $150.00 011-490-018 $150.00 011-490-019 $150.00 011-490-020 $150.00 011-490-021 $150.00 011-490-022 $150.00 011-490-023 $150.00 011-490-024 $150.00 011-490-025 $150.00 011-490-026 $150.00 011-490-027 $150.00 011-490-028 $150.00 011-490-029 $150.00 011-490-030 $150.00 011-490-031 $150.00 011-490-032 $150.00 011-490-033 $150.00 011-490-034 $150.00 011-490-035 $150.00 011-490-036 $150.00 011-490-037 $150.00 011-490-038 $150.00 011-490-039 $150.00 011-490-040 $150.00 011-490-041 $150.00 011-490-042 $150.00 011-490-043 $150.00 011-490-044 $150.00 011-490-045 $150.00 011-490-046 $150.00 011-490-047 $150.00 011-490-048 $150.00 011-490-049 $150.00 011-490-050 $150.00 011-490-051 $150.00 011-490-052 $150.00 011-490-053 $150.00 011-490-054 $150.00 011-490-055 $150.00 011-490-056 $150.00 011-490-057 $150.00 011-490-058 $150.00 011-490-059 $150.00 011-490-060 $150.00 011-490-061 $150.00 011-490-062 $150.00 011-490-063 $150.00 011-490-064 $150.00 011-490-065 $150.00 011-490-066 $150.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-490-067 $150.00 011-490-068 $150.00 011-490-069 $150.00 011-490-070 $150.00 011-490-071 $150.00 011-490-072 $150.00 011-500-001 $150.00 011-500-002 $150.00 011-500-003 $150.00 011-500-004 $150.00 011-500-005 $150.00 011-500-006 $150.00 011-500-007 $150.00 011-500-008 $150.00 011-500-009 $150.00 011-500-010 $150.00 011-500-011 $150.00 011-500-012 $150.00 011-500-013 $150.00 011-500-014 $150.00 011-500-015 $150.00 011-500-016 $150.00 011-500-017 $150.00 011-500-018 $150.00 011-500-019 $150.00 011-500-020 $150.00 011-500-021 $150.00 011-500-022 $150.00 011-500-023 $150.00 011-500-024 $150.00 011-500-025 $150.00 011-500-026 $150.00 011-500-027 $150.00 011-500-028 $150.00 011-500-029 $150.00 011-500-030 $150.00 011-500-031 $150.00 011-500-032 $150.00 011-500-033 $150.00 011-500-034 $150.00 011-500-035 $150.00 011-500-036 $150.00 011-500-037 $150.00 011-500-038 $150.00 011-500-039 $150.00 011-500-040 $150.00 011-500-041 $150.00 011-500-042 $150.00 011-500-043 $150.00 011-500-044 $150.00 011-500-045 $150.00 011-500-046 $150.00 011-500-047 $150.00 011-500-048 $150.00 011-500-049 $150.00 011-500-050 $150.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-500-051 $150.00 011-500-052 $150.00 011-500-053 $150.00 011-500-054 $150.00 011-500-055 $150.00 011-500-056 $150.00 011-500-057 $150.00 011-500-058 $150.00 011-500-059 $150.00 011-500-060 $150.00 011-500-061 $150.00 011-500-062 $150.00 011-500-063 $150.00 011-500-064 $150.00 011-500-065 $150.00 011-500-066 $150.00 011-500-067 $150.00 011-500-068 $150.00 011-500-069 $150.00 011-500-070 $150.00 011-500-071 $150.00 011-500-072 $150.00 011-500-073 $150.00 011-500-074 $150.00 011-500-075 $150.00 011-500-076 $150.00 011-500-077 $150.00 011-500-078 $150.00 011-500-079 $150.00 011-500-080 $150.00 011-500-081 $150.00 011-500-082 $150.00 011-500-083 $150.00 011-500-084 $150.00 011-500-085 $150.00 011-500-086 $150.00 011-500-087 $150.00 011-500-088 $150.00 011-500-089 $150.00 011-500-090 $150.00 011-500-091 $150.00 011-500-092 $150.00 011-500-093 $150.00 011-500-094 $150.00 011-500-095 $150.00 011-500-096 $150.00 011-500-097 $150.00 011-510-001 $150.00 011-510-002 $150.00 011-510-003 $150.00 011-510-004 $150.00 011-510-005 $150.00 011-510-006 $150.00 011-510-007 $150.00 011-510-008 $150.00 011-510-009 $150.00 85 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 670 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 61 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2833 M7 LEVY CODE: Discovery Bay West Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-510-010 $150.00 011-510-011 $150.00 011-510-012 $150.00 011-510-013 $150.00 011-510-014 $150.00 011-510-015 $150.00 011-510-016 $150.00 011-510-017 $150.00 011-510-018 $150.00 011-510-019 $150.00 011-510-020 $150.00 011-510-021 $150.00 011-510-022 $150.00 011-510-023 $150.00 011-510-024 $150.00 011-510-025 $150.00 011-510-026 $150.00 011-510-027 $150.00 011-510-028 $150.00 011-510-029 $150.00 011-510-030 $150.00 011-510-031 $150.00 011-510-032 $150.00 011-510-033 $150.00 011-510-034 $150.00 011-510-035 $150.00 011-510-036 $150.00 011-510-037 $150.00 011-510-038 $150.00 011-510-039 $150.00 011-510-040 $150.00 011-510-041 $150.00 011-510-042 $150.00 011-510-043 $150.00 011-510-044 $150.00 011-510-045 $150.00 011-510-046 $150.00 011-510-047 $150.00 011-510-048 $150.00 011-510-049 $150.00 011-510-050 $150.00 011-510-051 $150.00 011-510-052 $150.00 011-510-053 $150.00 011-510-054 $150.00 011-510-055 $150.00 011-510-056 $150.00 011-510-057 $150.00 011-510-058 $150.00 011-510-059 $150.00 011-510-060 $150.00 011-510-061 $150.00 011-510-062 $150.00 011-510-063 $150.00 011-510-064 $150.00 011-510-065 $150.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-510-066 $150.00 011-510-067 $150.00 011-510-068 $150.00 011-510-069 $150.00 011-510-070 $150.00 011-510-071 $150.00 011-510-072 $150.00 011-510-073 $150.00 011-510-074 $150.00 011-510-075 $150.00 011-510-076 $150.00 011-510-077 $150.00 011-510-078 $150.00 011-510-079 $150.00 011-510-080 $150.00 011-510-081 $150.00 011-510-082 $150.00 011-510-083 $150.00 011-510-084 $150.00 011-510-085 $150.00 011-510-086 $150.00 011-510-087 $150.00 011-510-088 $150.00 011-520-001 $75.00 011-520-002 $150.00 011-520-003 $150.00 011-520-004 $150.00 011-520-005 $150.00 011-520-006 $150.00 011-520-007 $150.00 011-520-008 $150.00 011-520-009 $150.00 011-520-010 $150.00 011-520-011 $150.00 011-520-012 $150.00 011-520-013 $150.00 011-520-014 $150.00 011-520-015 $150.00 011-520-016 $150.00 011-520-017 $150.00 011-520-018 $150.00 011-520-019 $150.00 011-520-020 $150.00 011-520-021 $150.00 011-520-022 $150.00 011-520-023 $150.00 011-520-024 $150.00 011-520-025 $150.00 011-520-026 $150.00 011-520-027 $150.00 011-520-028 $150.00 011-520-029 $150.00 011-520-030 $150.00 011-520-031 $150.00 011-520-032 $150.00 011-520-033 $150.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-520-034 $150.00 011-520-035 $150.00 011-520-036 $150.00 011-520-037 $150.00 011-520-038 $150.00 011-520-039 $150.00 011-520-040 $150.00 011-520-041 $150.00 011-520-042 $150.00 011-520-043 $150.00 011-520-044 $150.00 011-520-045 $150.00 011-520-046 $150.00 011-520-047 $150.00 011-520-048 $150.00 011-520-049 $150.00 011-520-050 $150.00 011-520-051 $150.00 011-520-052 $150.00 011-520-053 $150.00 011-520-054 $150.00 011-530-001 $150.00 011-530-002 $150.00 011-530-003 $150.00 011-530-004 $150.00 011-530-005 $150.00 011-530-006 $150.00 011-530-007 $150.00 011-530-008 $150.00 011-530-009 $150.00 011-530-010 $150.00 011-530-011 $150.00 011-530-012 $150.00 011-530-013 $150.00 011-530-014 $150.00 011-530-015 $150.00 011-530-016 $150.00 011-530-017 $150.00 011-530-018 $150.00 011-530-019 $150.00 011-530-020 $150.00 011-530-021 $150.00 011-530-022 $150.00 011-530-023 $150.00 011-530-024 $150.00 011-530-025 $150.00 011-530-026 $150.00 011-530-027 $150.00 011-530-028 $150.00 011-530-029 $150.00 011-530-030 $150.00 011-530-031 $150.00 011-530-032 $150.00 011-530-033 $150.00 011-530-034 $150.00 011-530-035 $150.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-530-036 $150.00 011-530-037 $150.00 011-530-038 $150.00 011-530-039 $150.00 011-530-040 $150.00 011-530-041 $150.00 011-530-042 $150.00 011-530-043 $150.00 011-530-044 $150.00 011-530-045 $150.00 011-530-046 $150.00 011-530-047 $150.00 011-530-048 $150.00 011-530-049 $150.00 011-530-050 $150.00 011-530-051 $150.00 011-530-052 $150.00 011-530-053 $150.00 011-530-054 $150.00 011-530-055 $150.00 011-530-056 $150.00 011-540-001 $150.00 011-540-002 $150.00 011-540-003 $150.00 011-540-004 $150.00 011-540-005 $150.00 011-540-006 $150.00 011-540-007 $150.00 011-540-008 $150.00 011-540-009 $150.00 011-540-010 $150.00 011-540-011 $150.00 011-540-012 $150.00 011-540-013 $150.00 011-540-014 $150.00 011-540-015 $150.00 011-540-016 $150.00 011-540-017 $150.00 011-540-018 $150.00 011-540-019 $150.00 011-540-020 $150.00 011-540-021 $150.00 011-540-022 $150.00 011-540-023 $150.00 011-540-024 $150.00 011-540-025 $150.00 011-540-026 $150.00 011-540-027 $150.00 011-540-028 $150.00 011-540-029 $150.00 011-540-030 $150.00 011-540-031 $150.00 011-540-032 $150.00 011-540-033 $150.00 011-540-034 $150.00 011-540-035 $150.00 86 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 671 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 61 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2833 M7 LEVY CODE: Discovery Bay West Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-540-036 $150.00 011-540-037 $150.00 011-540-038 $150.00 011-540-039 $150.00 011-540-040 $150.00 011-540-041 $150.00 011-540-042 $150.00 011-540-043 $150.00 011-540-044 $150.00 011-540-045 $150.00 011-540-046 $150.00 011-540-047 $150.00 011-550-001 $150.00 011-550-002 $150.00 011-550-003 $150.00 011-550-004 $150.00 011-550-005 $150.00 011-550-006 $150.00 011-550-007 $150.00 011-550-008 $150.00 011-550-009 $150.00 011-550-010 $150.00 011-550-011 $150.00 011-550-012 $150.00 011-550-013 $150.00 011-550-014 $150.00 011-550-015 $150.00 011-550-016 $150.00 011-550-017 $150.00 011-550-018 $150.00 011-550-019 $150.00 011-550-020 $150.00 011-550-021 $150.00 011-550-022 $150.00 011-550-023 $150.00 011-550-024 $150.00 011-550-025 $150.00 011-550-026 $150.00 011-550-027 $150.00 011-550-028 $150.00 011-550-029 $150.00 011-550-030 $150.00 011-550-031 $150.00 011-550-032 $150.00 011-550-033 $150.00 011-550-034 $150.00 011-550-035 $150.00 011-550-036 $150.00 011-550-037 $150.00 011-550-038 $150.00 011-550-039 $150.00 011-550-040 $150.00 011-550-041 $150.00 011-550-042 $150.00 011-550-043 $150.00 011-550-044 $150.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-550-045 $150.00 011-550-046 $150.00 011-550-047 $150.00 011-550-048 $150.00 011-550-049 $150.00 011-550-050 $150.00 011-550-051 $150.00 011-550-052 $150.00 011-550-053 $150.00 011-550-054 $150.00 011-550-055 $150.00 011-550-056 $150.00 011-550-057 $150.00 011-550-058 $150.00 011-550-059 $150.00 011-550-060 $150.00 011-550-061 $150.00 011-550-062 $150.00 011-550-063 $150.00 011-550-064 $150.00 011-550-065 $150.00 011-550-066 $150.00 011-550-067 $150.00 011-550-068 $150.00 011-550-069 $150.00 011-550-070 $150.00 011-550-071 $150.00 011-550-072 $150.00 011-550-073 $150.00 011-550-074 $150.00 011-550-075 $150.00 011-550-076 $150.00 011-550-077 $150.00 011-550-078 $150.00 011-550-079 $150.00 011-550-080 $150.00 011-550-081 $150.00 011-550-082 $150.00 011-550-083 $150.00 011-550-084 $150.00 011-550-085 $150.00 011-550-086 $150.00 011-550-087 $150.00 011-550-088 $150.00 011-550-089 $150.00 011-550-090 $150.00 011-550-091 $150.00 011-550-092 $150.00 011-560-001 $150.00 011-560-002 $150.00 011-560-003 $150.00 011-560-004 $150.00 011-560-005 $150.00 011-560-006 $150.00 011-560-007 $150.00 011-560-008 $150.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-560-009 $150.00 011-560-010 $150.00 011-560-011 $150.00 011-560-012 $150.00 011-560-013 $150.00 011-560-014 $150.00 011-560-015 $150.00 011-560-016 $150.00 011-560-017 $150.00 011-560-018 $150.00 011-560-019 $150.00 011-560-020 $150.00 011-560-021 $150.00 011-560-022 $150.00 011-560-023 $150.00 011-560-024 $150.00 011-560-025 $150.00 011-560-026 $150.00 011-560-027 $150.00 011-560-028 $150.00 011-560-029 $150.00 011-560-030 $150.00 011-560-031 $150.00 011-560-032 $150.00 011-560-033 $150.00 011-560-034 $75.00 011-560-035 $150.00 011-560-036 $150.00 011-560-037 $150.00 011-560-038 $150.00 011-560-039 $75.00 011-560-040 $150.00 011-560-041 $150.00 011-560-042 $150.00 011-560-043 $150.00 011-560-044 $150.00 011-560-045 $150.00 011-560-046 $150.00 011-560-047 $150.00 011-560-048 $150.00 011-560-049 $150.00 011-560-050 $150.00 011-560-051 $150.00 011-560-052 $150.00 011-560-053 $150.00 011-560-054 $150.00 011-560-055 $150.00 011-560-056 $150.00 011-560-057 $150.00 011-560-058 $150.00 011-560-059 $150.00 011-560-060 $150.00 011-560-061 $150.00 011-560-062 $75.00 011-560-063 $75.00 011-560-064 $75.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-560-065 $75.00 011-560-066 $75.00 011-560-067 $150.00 011-560-068 $150.00 011-560-069 $150.00 011-560-070 $150.00 011-560-071 $150.00 011-560-072 $150.00 011-560-073 $150.00 011-560-074 $150.00 011-560-075 $150.00 011-560-076 $150.00 011-560-077 $150.00 011-560-078 $150.00 011-560-079 $150.00 011-560-080 $150.00 011-560-081 $150.00 011-560-082 $150.00 011-560-083 $150.00 011-570-001 $150.00 011-570-002 $150.00 011-570-003 $150.00 011-570-004 $150.00 011-570-005 $150.00 011-570-006 $150.00 011-570-007 $150.00 011-570-008 $150.00 011-570-009 $150.00 011-570-010 $150.00 011-570-011 $150.00 011-570-012 $150.00 011-570-013 $150.00 011-570-014 $150.00 011-570-015 $150.00 011-570-016 $150.00 011-570-017 $150.00 011-570-018 $150.00 011-570-019 $150.00 011-570-020 $150.00 011-570-021 $150.00 011-570-022 $150.00 011-570-023 $150.00 011-570-024 $150.00 011-570-025 $150.00 011-570-026 $150.00 011-570-027 $150.00 011-570-028 $150.00 011-570-029 $150.00 011-570-030 $150.00 011-570-031 $150.00 011-570-032 $150.00 011-570-033 $150.00 011-570-034 $150.00 011-570-035 $150.00 011-570-036 $150.00 011-570-037 $150.00 87 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 672 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 61 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2833 M7 LEVY CODE: Discovery Bay West Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-570-038 $150.00 011-570-039 $150.00 011-570-040 $150.00 011-570-041 $150.00 011-570-042 $150.00 011-570-043 $150.00 011-570-044 $150.00 011-570-045 $150.00 011-570-046 $150.00 011-570-047 $150.00 011-570-048 $75.00 011-580-001 $150.00 011-580-002 $150.00 011-580-003 $150.00 011-580-004 $150.00 011-580-005 $150.00 011-580-006 $150.00 011-580-007 $150.00 011-580-008 $150.00 011-580-009 $150.00 011-580-010 $150.00 011-580-011 $150.00 011-580-012 $150.00 011-580-013 $150.00 011-580-014 $150.00 011-580-015 $150.00 011-580-016 $150.00 011-580-017 $150.00 011-580-018 $150.00 011-580-019 $150.00 011-580-020 $150.00 011-580-021 $150.00 011-580-022 $150.00 011-580-023 $150.00 011-580-024 $150.00 011-580-025 $150.00 011-580-026 $150.00 011-580-027 $150.00 011-580-028 $150.00 011-580-029 $150.00 011-580-030 $150.00 011-580-031 $150.00 011-580-032 $150.00 011-580-033 $150.00 011-580-034 $150.00 011-580-035 $150.00 011-580-036 $150.00 011-580-037 $150.00 011-580-038 $150.00 011-580-039 $150.00 011-580-040 $150.00 011-580-041 $150.00 011-580-042 $150.00 011-580-043 $150.00 011-580-044 $150.00 011-580-045 $150.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-580-046 $150.00 011-580-047 $150.00 011-580-048 $150.00 011-580-049 $150.00 011-580-050 $150.00 011-580-051 $150.00 011-580-052 $150.00 011-580-053 $150.00 011-580-054 $150.00 011-580-055 $150.00 011-580-056 $150.00 011-580-057 $150.00 011-580-058 $150.00 011-580-059 $150.00 011-580-060 $150.00 011-580-061 $150.00 011-580-062 $150.00 011-580-063 $150.00 011-580-064 $150.00 011-580-065 $150.00 011-580-066 $150.00 011-580-067 $150.00 011-580-068 $150.00 011-580-069 $150.00 011-580-070 $150.00 011-580-071 $150.00 011-580-072 $150.00 011-580-073 $150.00 011-580-074 $150.00 011-580-075 $150.00 011-580-076 $150.00 011-580-077 $150.00 011-580-078 $150.00 011-580-079 $150.00 011-580-080 $150.00 011-580-081 $150.00 011-580-082 $150.00 011-590-001 $150.00 011-590-002 $150.00 011-590-003 $150.00 011-590-004 $150.00 011-590-005 $150.00 011-590-006 $150.00 011-590-007 $150.00 011-590-008 $150.00 011-590-009 $150.00 011-590-010 $150.00 011-590-011 $150.00 011-590-012 $150.00 011-590-013 $150.00 011-590-014 $150.00 011-590-015 $150.00 011-590-016 $150.00 011-590-017 $150.00 011-590-018 $150.00 011-590-019 $150.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-590-020 $150.00 011-590-021 $150.00 011-590-022 $150.00 011-590-023 $150.00 011-590-024 $150.00 011-590-025 $150.00 011-590-026 $150.00 011-590-027 $150.00 011-590-028 $150.00 011-590-029 $150.00 011-590-030 $150.00 011-590-031 $150.00 011-590-032 $150.00 011-590-033 $150.00 011-590-034 $150.00 011-590-035 $150.00 011-590-036 $150.00 011-590-037 $150.00 011-590-038 $150.00 011-590-039 $150.00 011-590-040 $150.00 011-590-041 $150.00 011-590-042 $150.00 011-590-043 $150.00 011-590-044 $150.00 011-590-045 $150.00 011-590-046 $150.00 011-590-047 $150.00 011-590-048 $150.00 011-590-049 $150.00 011-590-050 $150.00 011-590-051 $150.00 011-590-052 $150.00 011-590-053 $150.00 011-590-054 $150.00 011-590-055 $150.00 011-630-004 $150.00 011-630-005 $150.00 011-630-006 $150.00 011-630-007 $150.00 011-630-008 $150.00 011-630-009 $150.00 011-630-018 $150.00 011-630-019 $150.00 011-630-038 $150.00 011-630-039 $150.00 011-630-057 $150.00 011-630-058 $150.00 011-640-001 $75.00 011-640-002 $75.00 011-640-003 $75.00 011-640-004 $75.00 011-640-005 $75.00 011-640-006 $75.00 011-640-007 $75.00 011-640-008 $75.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-640-009 $75.00 011-640-010 $75.00 011-640-011 $75.00 011-640-012 $75.00 011-640-013 $75.00 011-640-014 $75.00 011-640-015 $75.00 011-640-016 $75.00 011-640-017 $75.00 011-640-018 $75.00 011-640-019 $75.00 011-640-020 $75.00 011-640-021 $75.00 011-640-022 $75.00 011-640-023 $75.00 011-640-024 $75.00 011-640-025 $75.00 011-640-026 $75.00 011-640-027 $75.00 011-640-028 $75.00 011-640-029 $75.00 011-640-030 $75.00 011-640-031 $75.00 011-640-032 $75.00 011-640-033 $75.00 011-640-034 $75.00 011-640-035 $75.00 011-640-036 $75.00 011-640-037 $75.00 011-640-038 $75.00 011-650-001 $75.00 011-650-002 $75.00 011-650-003 $75.00 011-650-004 $75.00 011-650-005 $75.00 011-650-006 $75.00 011-650-007 $75.00 011-650-008 $150.00 011-650-009 $150.00 011-650-010 $150.00 011-650-011 $150.00 011-650-012 $75.00 011-650-013 $75.00 011-650-014 $75.00 011-650-015 $75.00 011-650-016 $75.00 011-650-017 $75.00 011-650-018 $75.00 011-650-019 $75.00 011-650-020 $75.00 011-650-021 $75.00 011-650-022 $75.00 011-650-023 $75.00 011-650-024 $75.00 011-650-025 $75.00 011-650-026 $75.00 88 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 673 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 61 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2833 M7 LEVY CODE: Discovery Bay West Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-650-027 $75.00 011-650-028 $75.00 011-650-029 $75.00 011-650-030 $75.00 011-650-031 $75.00 011-650-032 $75.00 011-650-033 $75.00 011-650-034 $75.00 011-650-035 $75.00 011-650-036 $75.00 011-650-037 $75.00 011-650-038 $75.00 011-650-039 $75.00 011-650-040 $75.00 011-650-041 $75.00 011-650-042 $75.00 011-650-043 $75.00 011-650-044 $75.00 011-650-045 $75.00 011-650-046 $75.00 011-650-047 $75.00 011-650-048 $75.00 011-650-049 $75.00 011-650-050 $75.00 011-650-051 $75.00 011-650-052 $75.00 011-650-053 $75.00 011-650-054 $75.00 011-650-055 $75.00 011-650-056 $75.00 011-650-057 $75.00 011-650-058 $75.00 011-650-059 $75.00 011-650-060 $75.00 011-650-061 $75.00 011-650-062 $75.00 011-650-063 $75.00 011-650-064 $75.00 011-650-065 $75.00 011-650-066 $75.00 011-650-067 $75.00 011-650-068 $75.00 011-650-069 $75.00 011-650-070 $150.00 011-650-071 $150.00 011-650-072 $150.00 011-650-073 $150.00 011-650-074 $150.00 011-650-075 $150.00 011-650-076 $150.00 011-650-077 $75.00 011-650-078 $75.00 011-650-079 $75.00 011-650-080 $75.00 011-650-081 $75.00 011-650-082 $75.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-650-083 $75.00 011-650-084 $75.00 011-650-085 $75.00 011-650-086 $75.00 011-650-087 $75.00 011-650-088 $75.00 011-650-089 $75.00 011-650-090 $75.00 011-650-091 $75.00 011-650-092 $75.00 011-650-093 $75.00 011-650-094 $75.00 011-650-095 $75.00 011-650-096 $75.00 011-650-097 $75.00 011-650-098 $75.00 011-650-099 $75.00 011-650-100 $150.00 011-650-101 $150.00 011-650-102 $150.00 011-650-103 $150.00 011-650-104 $150.00 011-650-105 $150.00 011-650-106 $150.00 011-650-107 $150.00 011-650-108 $150.00 011-650-109 $150.00 011-650-110 $150.00 011-660-001 $75.00 011-660-002 $75.00 011-660-003 $75.00 011-660-004 $75.00 011-660-005 $75.00 011-660-006 $75.00 011-660-007 $75.00 011-660-008 $75.00 011-660-009 $75.00 011-660-010 $75.00 011-660-011 $75.00 011-660-012 $75.00 011-660-013 $75.00 011-660-014 $75.00 011-660-015 $75.00 011-660-016 $75.00 011-660-017 $75.00 011-660-018 $75.00 011-660-019 $75.00 011-660-020 $75.00 011-660-021 $75.00 011-660-022 $75.00 011-660-023 $75.00 011-660-024 $75.00 011-660-025 $75.00 011-660-026 $75.00 011-660-027 $75.00 011-660-028 $75.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-660-029 $75.00 011-660-030 $75.00 011-660-031 $75.00 011-660-032 $75.00 011-660-033 $75.00 011-660-034 $75.00 011-660-035 $75.00 011-660-036 $75.00 011-660-037 $75.00 011-660-038 $75.00 011-660-039 $75.00 011-660-040 $75.00 011-660-041 $75.00 011-660-042 $75.00 011-670-001 $75.00 011-670-002 $75.00 011-670-003 $75.00 011-670-004 $75.00 011-670-005 $75.00 011-670-006 $75.00 011-670-007 $75.00 011-670-008 $75.00 011-670-009 $75.00 011-670-010 $75.00 011-670-011 $75.00 011-670-012 $75.00 011-670-013 $75.00 011-670-014 $75.00 011-670-015 $75.00 011-670-016 $75.00 011-670-017 $75.00 011-670-018 $75.00 011-670-019 $75.00 011-670-020 $75.00 011-670-021 $75.00 011-670-022 $75.00 011-670-023 $75.00 011-670-024 $75.00 011-670-025 $75.00 011-670-026 $75.00 011-670-027 $75.00 011-670-028 $75.00 011-670-029 $75.00 011-670-030 $75.00 011-670-031 $75.00 011-670-032 $75.00 011-670-033 $75.00 011-670-034 $75.00 011-670-035 $75.00 011-670-036 $75.00 011-670-037 $75.00 011-670-038 $75.00 011-670-039 $75.00 011-670-040 $75.00 011-670-041 $75.00 011-670-042 $75.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-670-043 $75.00 011-680-001 $75.00 011-680-002 $75.00 011-680-003 $75.00 011-680-004 $75.00 011-680-005 $75.00 011-680-006 $75.00 011-680-007 $75.00 011-680-008 $75.00 011-680-009 $75.00 011-680-010 $75.00 011-680-011 $75.00 011-680-012 $75.00 011-680-013 $75.00 011-680-014 $75.00 011-680-015 $75.00 011-680-016 $75.00 011-680-017 $75.00 011-680-018 $75.00 011-680-019 $75.00 011-680-020 $75.00 011-680-021 $75.00 011-680-022 $75.00 011-680-023 $75.00 011-680-024 $75.00 011-680-025 $75.00 011-680-026 $75.00 011-680-027 $75.00 011-680-028 $75.00 011-680-029 $75.00 011-680-030 $75.00 011-680-031 $75.00 011-680-032 $75.00 011-680-033 $75.00 011-680-034 $75.00 011-680-035 $75.00 011-680-036 $75.00 011-680-037 $75.00 011-680-038 $75.00 011-680-039 $75.00 011-680-040 $75.00 011-680-041 $75.00 011-680-042 $75.00 011-680-043 $75.00 011-680-044 $75.00 011-680-045 $75.00 011-680-046 $75.00 011-680-047 $75.00 011-680-048 $75.00 011-680-049 $75.00 011-680-050 $75.00 011-680-051 $75.00 011-680-052 $75.00 011-680-053 $75.00 011-680-054 $75.00 011-680-055 $75.00 89 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 674 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 61 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2833 M7 LEVY CODE: Discovery Bay West Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-680-056 $75.00 011-680-057 $75.00 011-680-058 $75.00 011-680-059 $75.00 011-680-060 $75.00 011-690-001 $75.00 011-690-002 $75.00 011-690-003 $75.00 011-690-004 $75.00 011-690-005 $75.00 011-690-006 $75.00 011-690-007 $75.00 011-690-008 $75.00 011-690-009 $75.00 011-690-010 $75.00 011-690-011 $75.00 011-690-012 $75.00 011-690-013 $75.00 011-690-014 $75.00 011-690-015 $75.00 011-690-016 $75.00 011-690-017 $75.00 011-690-018 $75.00 011-690-019 $75.00 011-690-020 $75.00 011-690-021 $75.00 011-690-022 $75.00 011-690-023 $75.00 011-690-024 $75.00 011-690-025 $75.00 011-690-026 $75.00 011-690-027 $75.00 011-690-028 $75.00 011-690-029 $75.00 011-690-030 $75.00 011-690-031 $75.00 011-690-032 $75.00 011-690-033 $75.00 011-690-034 $75.00 011-690-035 $75.00 011-690-036 $75.00 011-690-037 $75.00 011-690-038 $75.00 011-690-039 $75.00 011-690-040 $75.00 011-690-041 $75.00 011-690-042 $75.00 011-690-043 $75.00 011-690-044 $75.00 011-690-045 $75.00 011-690-046 $75.00 011-690-047 $75.00 011-630-099 $150.00 011-630-100 $150.00 011-630-101 $150.00 011-630-102 $150.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-630-103 $150.00 011-630-104 $150.00 011-630-105 $150.00 011-630-106 $150.00 011-630-107 $150.00 011-630-108 $150.00 011-630-109 $150.00 011-630-110 $150.00 011-630-111 $150.00 011-630-112 $150.00 011-630-113 $150.00 011-630-114 $150.00 011-630-115 $150.00 011-630-116 $150.00 011-630-117 $150.00 011-630-118 $150.00 011-630-119 $150.00 011-630-120 $150.00 011-630-121 $150.00 011-630-122 $150.00 011-630-123 $150.00 011-630-124 $150.00 011-630-125 $150.00 011-630-126 $150.00 011-630-127 $150.00 011-630-128 $150.00 011-630-129 $150.00 011-630-130 $150.00 011-630-131 $150.00 011-630-132 $150.00 011-630-133 $150.00 011-630-134 $150.00 011-630-135 $150.00 011-630-136 $150.00 011-630-137 $150.00 011-630-138 $150.00 011-630-139 $150.00 011-630-140 $150.00 011-630-141 $150.00 011-630-142 $150.00 011-630-143 $150.00 011-630-144 $150.00 011-630-145 $150.00 011-630-146 $150.00 011-630-147 $150.00 011-630-148 $150.00 011-630-149 $150.00 011-630-150 $150.00 011-630-151 $150.00 011-630-152 $150.00 011-630-153 $150.00 011-630-154 $150.00 011-630-155 $150.00 011-630-156 $150.00 011-630-157 $150.00 011-630-158 $150.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-630-159 $150.00 011-630-160 $150.00 011-630-161 $150.00 011-630-162 $150.00 011-630-163 $150.00 011-630-164 $150.00 011-630-165 $150.00 011-630-166 $150.00 011-630-167 $150.00 011-630-168 $150.00 011-630-169 $150.00 011-630-170 $150.00 011-630-171 $150.00 011-630-172 $150.00 011-630-173 $150.00 011-630-174 $150.00 011-630-175 $150.00 011-630-176 $150.00 011-630-177 $150.00 011-630-178 $150.00 1924Total Parcels: $264,825.00 Total Assessment: 90 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 675 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 63 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2815 NA LEVY CODE: Parkway Estates - North Richmond Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 408-230-001 $230.00 408-230-002 $230.00 408-230-003 $230.00 408-230-004 $230.00 408-230-005 $230.00 408-230-006 $230.00 408-230-007 $230.00 408-230-008 $230.00 408-230-009 $230.00 408-230-010 $230.00 408-230-011 $230.00 408-230-012 $230.00 408-230-013 $230.00 408-230-014 $230.00 408-230-015 $230.00 408-230-016 $230.00 408-230-017 $230.00 408-230-018 $230.00 408-230-019 $230.00 408-230-020 $230.00 408-230-021 $230.00 408-230-022 $230.00 408-230-023 $230.00 408-230-024 $230.00 408-230-025 $230.00 408-230-026 $230.00 408-230-027 $230.00 408-230-028 $230.00 408-230-029 $230.00 408-230-030 $230.00 408-230-031 $230.00 408-230-032 $230.00 408-230-033 $230.00 408-230-034 $230.00 408-230-035 $230.00 408-230-036 $230.00 408-230-037 $230.00 408-230-038 $230.00 408-230-039 $230.00 408-230-040 $230.00 408-230-041 $230.00 408-230-042 $230.00 408-230-043 $230.00 408-230-044 $230.00 408-230-045 $230.00 408-230-046 $230.00 408-230-047 $230.00 408-230-048 $230.00 408-230-049 $230.00 408-230-050 $230.00 408-230-051 $230.00 408-230-052 $230.00 408-230-053 $230.00 408-230-054 $230.00 408-230-055 $230.00 408-230-056 $230.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 408-230-057 $230.00 408-230-058 $230.00 408-230-059 $230.00 408-230-060 $230.00 408-230-061 $230.00 408-230-062 $230.00 408-230-063 $230.00 408-230-064 $230.00 408-230-065 $230.00 408-230-066 $230.00 408-230-067 $230.00 408-230-068 $230.00 408-230-069 $230.00 408-230-070 $230.00 408-230-071 $230.00 408-230-072 $230.00 408-230-073 $230.00 408-230-074 $230.00 408-230-075 $230.00 408-230-076 $230.00 408-230-077 $230.00 408-230-078 $230.00 408-230-079 $230.00 408-230-080 $230.00 408-230-081 $230.00 408-230-082 $230.00 408-230-083 $230.00 408-230-084 $230.00 408-230-085 $230.00 408-230-086 $230.00 408-230-087 $230.00 87Total Parcels: $20,010.00 Total Assessment: 91 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 676 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 64 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2864 L1 LEVY CODE: California Reflections - Pinole Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 403-540-001 $250.00 403-540-002 $250.00 403-540-003 $250.00 403-540-004 $250.00 403-540-005 $250.00 403-540-006 $250.00 403-540-007 $250.00 403-540-008 $250.00 403-540-009 $250.00 403-540-010 $250.00 403-540-011 $250.00 403-540-012 $250.00 403-540-013 $250.00 403-540-014 $250.00 403-540-015 $250.00 403-540-016 $250.00 403-540-017 $250.00 403-540-018 $250.00 403-540-019 $250.00 403-540-020 $250.00 403-540-021 $250.00 403-540-022 $250.00 403-540-023 $250.00 403-540-024 $250.00 403-540-026 $250.00 403-540-027 $250.00 403-540-028 $250.00 403-540-029 $250.00 403-540-030 $250.00 403-540-031 $250.00 403-540-025 $250.00 31Total Parcels: $7,750.00 Total Assessment: 92 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 677 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 68 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2882 NB LEVY CODE: Wendt Ranch - Danville Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-530-001 $5.00 206-530-002 $5.00 206-530-003 $5.00 206-530-004 $5.00 206-530-005 $5.00 206-530-006 $5.00 206-530-007 $5.00 206-530-008 $5.00 206-530-009 $5.00 206-530-010 $5.00 206-530-011 $5.00 206-530-012 $5.00 206-530-013 $5.00 206-530-014 $5.00 206-530-015 $5.00 206-530-016 $5.00 206-530-017 $5.00 206-530-018 $5.00 206-530-019 $5.00 206-530-020 $5.00 206-530-021 $5.00 206-530-022 $5.00 206-530-023 $5.00 206-530-024 $5.00 206-530-025 $5.00 206-530-026 $5.00 206-530-027 $5.00 206-530-028 $5.00 206-530-029 $5.00 206-530-030 $5.00 206-530-031 $5.00 206-530-032 $5.00 206-530-033 $5.00 206-530-034 $5.00 206-530-035 $5.00 206-530-036 $5.00 206-530-037 $5.00 206-530-038 $5.00 206-530-039 $5.00 206-530-040 $5.00 206-530-041 $5.00 206-530-042 $5.00 206-530-043 $5.00 206-530-044 $5.00 206-530-045 $5.00 206-530-046 $5.00 206-530-047 $5.00 206-530-048 $5.00 206-530-049 $5.00 206-530-050 $5.00 206-530-051 $5.00 206-530-052 $5.00 206-530-053 $5.00 206-530-054 $5.00 206-530-055 $5.00 206-530-056 $5.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-530-057 $5.00 206-530-058 $5.00 206-530-059 $5.00 206-530-060 $5.00 206-530-061 $5.00 206-530-062 $5.00 206-530-063 $5.00 206-530-064 $5.00 206-530-065 $5.00 206-530-066 $5.00 206-530-067 $5.00 206-530-068 $5.00 206-530-069 $5.00 206-530-070 $5.00 206-530-071 $5.00 206-530-072 $5.00 206-530-073 $5.00 206-530-074 $5.00 206-530-075 $5.00 206-530-076 $5.00 206-530-077 $5.00 206-530-078 $5.00 206-530-079 $5.00 206-550-001 $5.00 206-550-002 $5.00 206-550-003 $5.00 206-550-004 $5.00 206-550-005 $5.00 206-550-006 $5.00 206-550-007 $5.00 206-550-008 $5.00 206-550-009 $5.00 206-550-010 $5.00 206-550-011 $5.00 206-550-012 $5.00 206-550-013 $5.00 206-550-014 $5.00 206-550-015 $5.00 206-550-016 $5.00 206-550-017 $5.00 206-550-018 $5.00 206-550-019 $5.00 206-550-020 $5.00 206-550-021 $5.00 206-550-022 $5.00 206-550-023 $5.00 206-550-024 $5.00 206-550-025 $5.00 206-550-026 $5.00 206-550-027 $5.00 206-550-028 $5.00 206-550-029 $5.00 206-550-030 $5.00 206-550-031 $5.00 206-550-032 $5.00 206-550-033 $5.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-550-034 $5.00 206-550-035 $5.00 206-550-036 $5.00 206-550-037 $5.00 206-650-001 $5.00 206-650-002 $5.00 206-650-003 $5.00 206-650-004 $5.00 206-650-005 $5.00 206-650-006 $5.00 206-650-007 $5.00 206-650-008 $5.00 206-650-009 $5.00 125Total Parcels: $625.00 Total Assessment: 93 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 678 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 69 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2871 NL LEVY CODE: Alamo Creek - Danville Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-660-032 $5.00 206-660-033 $5.00 206-660-034 $5.00 206-660-035 $5.00 206-660-036 $5.00 206-660-037 $5.00 206-660-038 $5.00 206-660-039 $5.00 206-660-040 $5.00 206-660-041 $5.00 206-660-042 $5.00 206-660-043 $5.00 206-660-044 $5.00 206-660-045 $5.00 206-660-046 $5.00 206-660-047 $5.00 206-660-048 $5.00 206-660-049 $5.00 206-660-050 $5.00 206-670-001 $5.00 206-670-002 $5.00 206-670-003 $5.00 206-670-004 $5.00 206-670-005 $5.00 206-670-006 $5.00 206-670-007 $5.00 206-670-008 $5.00 206-670-009 $5.00 206-670-010 $5.00 206-670-011 $5.00 206-670-012 $5.00 206-670-013 $5.00 206-670-014 $5.00 206-670-015 $5.00 206-670-016 $5.00 206-670-017 $5.00 206-670-018 $5.00 206-670-019 $5.00 206-670-020 $5.00 206-670-021 $5.00 206-670-022 $5.00 206-670-023 $5.00 206-670-024 $5.00 206-670-025 $5.00 206-670-026 $5.00 206-670-027 $5.00 206-670-028 $5.00 206-670-029 $5.00 206-670-030 $5.00 206-670-031 $5.00 206-670-032 $5.00 206-670-033 $5.00 206-670-034 $5.00 206-670-035 $5.00 206-670-036 $5.00 206-670-037 $5.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-670-038 $5.00 206-670-039 $5.00 206-670-040 $5.00 206-670-041 $5.00 206-670-042 $5.00 206-670-043 $5.00 206-670-044 $5.00 206-670-045 $5.00 206-670-046 $5.00 206-670-047 $5.00 206-670-048 $5.00 206-670-049 $5.00 206-670-050 $5.00 206-680-001 $5.00 206-680-002 $5.00 206-680-003 $5.00 206-680-004 $5.00 206-680-005 $5.00 206-680-006 $5.00 206-680-007 $5.00 206-680-008 $5.00 206-680-009 $5.00 206-680-010 $5.00 206-680-011 $5.00 206-680-012 $5.00 206-680-013 $5.00 206-680-014 $5.00 206-680-015 $5.00 206-680-016 $5.00 206-680-017 $5.00 206-680-018 $5.00 206-680-019 $5.00 206-680-020 $5.00 206-700-001 $2.50 206-700-002 $2.50 206-700-003 $2.50 206-700-004 $2.50 206-700-005 $2.50 206-700-006 $2.50 206-700-007 $2.50 206-700-008 $2.50 206-700-009 $2.50 206-700-010 $2.50 206-700-011 $2.50 206-700-012 $2.50 206-700-013 $2.50 206-700-014 $2.50 206-700-015 $2.50 206-700-016 $2.50 206-700-017 $2.50 206-700-018 $2.50 206-700-019 $2.50 206-700-020 $2.50 206-700-021 $2.50 206-700-022 $2.50 206-700-023 $2.50 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-700-024 $2.50 206-700-025 $2.50 206-700-026 $2.50 206-700-027 $2.50 206-700-028 $2.50 206-700-029 $2.50 206-700-030 $2.50 206-700-031 $2.50 206-700-032 $2.50 206-700-033 $2.50 206-700-034 $2.50 206-700-035 $2.50 206-700-036 $2.50 206-700-037 $2.50 206-700-038 $2.50 206-700-039 $2.50 206-700-040 $2.50 206-700-041 $2.50 206-700-042 $2.50 206-700-043 $2.50 206-700-044 $2.50 206-700-045 $2.50 206-700-046 $2.50 206-700-047 $2.50 206-700-048 $2.50 206-700-049 $2.50 206-700-050 $2.50 206-700-051 $2.50 206-700-052 $2.50 206-700-053 $2.50 206-700-054 $2.50 206-700-055 $2.50 206-700-056 $2.50 206-700-057 $2.50 206-700-058 $2.50 206-700-059 $2.50 206-700-060 $2.50 206-700-061 $2.50 206-700-062 $2.50 206-700-063 $2.50 206-700-064 $2.50 206-700-065 $2.50 206-700-066 $2.50 206-700-067 $2.50 206-700-068 $2.50 206-700-069 $2.50 206-700-070 $2.50 206-700-071 $2.50 206-700-072 $2.50 206-700-073 $2.50 206-700-074 $2.50 206-700-075 $2.50 206-700-076 $2.50 206-700-077 $2.50 206-700-078 $2.50 206-700-079 $2.50 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-700-080 $2.50 206-700-081 $2.50 206-700-082 $2.50 206-700-083 $2.50 206-700-084 $2.50 206-700-085 $2.50 206-700-086 $2.50 206-700-087 $2.50 206-700-088 $2.50 206-700-089 $2.50 206-700-090 $2.50 206-700-091 $2.50 206-700-092 $2.50 206-700-093 $2.50 206-700-094 $2.50 206-700-095 $2.50 206-700-096 $2.50 206-700-097 $2.50 206-700-098 $2.50 206-700-099 $2.50 206-700-100 $2.50 206-700-101 $2.50 206-700-102 $2.50 206-700-103 $2.50 206-700-104 $2.50 206-700-105 $2.50 206-700-106 $2.50 206-700-107 $2.50 206-700-108 $2.50 206-700-109 $2.50 206-700-110 $2.50 206-700-111 $2.50 206-700-112 $2.50 206-700-113 $2.50 206-700-114 $2.50 206-700-115 $2.50 206-700-116 $2.50 206-700-117 $2.50 206-700-118 $2.50 206-700-119 $2.50 206-700-120 $2.50 206-700-121 $2.50 206-700-122 $2.50 206-700-123 $2.50 206-700-124 $2.50 206-700-125 $2.50 206-700-126 $2.50 206-700-127 $2.50 206-710-001 $5.00 206-710-002 $5.00 206-710-003 $5.00 206-710-004 $5.00 206-710-005 $5.00 206-710-006 $5.00 206-710-007 $5.00 206-710-008 $5.00 94 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 679 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 69 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2871 NL LEVY CODE: Alamo Creek - Danville Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-710-009 $5.00 206-710-010 $5.00 206-710-011 $5.00 206-710-012 $5.00 206-710-013 $5.00 206-710-014 $5.00 206-710-015 $5.00 206-710-016 $5.00 206-710-017 $5.00 206-710-018 $5.00 206-710-019 $5.00 206-710-020 $5.00 206-710-021 $5.00 206-710-022 $5.00 206-710-023 $5.00 206-710-024 $5.00 206-710-025 $5.00 206-710-026 $5.00 206-710-027 $5.00 206-710-028 $5.00 206-710-029 $5.00 206-710-030 $5.00 206-710-031 $5.00 206-710-032 $5.00 206-710-033 $5.00 206-710-034 $5.00 206-710-035 $5.00 206-710-036 $5.00 206-710-037 $5.00 206-710-038 $5.00 206-710-039 $5.00 206-710-040 $5.00 206-710-041 $5.00 206-710-042 $5.00 206-710-043 $5.00 206-710-044 $5.00 206-710-045 $5.00 206-710-046 $5.00 206-710-047 $5.00 206-710-048 $5.00 206-710-049 $5.00 206-710-050 $5.00 206-710-051 $5.00 206-710-052 $5.00 206-710-053 $5.00 206-710-054 $5.00 206-710-055 $5.00 206-710-056 $5.00 206-710-057 $5.00 206-710-058 $5.00 206-710-059 $5.00 206-710-060 $5.00 206-720-001 $5.00 206-720-002 $5.00 206-720-003 $5.00 206-720-004 $5.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-720-005 $5.00 206-720-006 $5.00 206-720-007 $5.00 206-720-008 $5.00 206-720-009 $5.00 206-720-010 $5.00 206-720-011 $5.00 206-720-012 $5.00 206-720-013 $5.00 206-720-014 $5.00 206-720-015 $5.00 206-720-016 $5.00 206-720-017 $5.00 206-720-018 $5.00 206-720-019 $5.00 206-720-020 $5.00 206-720-021 $5.00 206-720-022 $5.00 206-720-023 $5.00 206-720-024 $5.00 206-720-025 $5.00 206-720-026 $5.00 206-720-027 $5.00 206-720-028 $5.00 206-720-029 $5.00 206-720-030 $5.00 206-720-031 $5.00 206-720-032 $5.00 206-720-033 $5.00 206-720-034 $5.00 206-720-035 $5.00 206-720-036 $5.00 206-720-037 $5.00 206-720-038 $5.00 206-720-039 $5.00 206-720-040 $5.00 206-720-041 $5.00 206-720-042 $5.00 206-720-043 $5.00 206-720-044 $5.00 206-720-045 $5.00 206-720-046 $5.00 206-720-047 $5.00 206-720-048 $5.00 206-720-049 $5.00 206-720-050 $5.00 206-720-051 $5.00 206-720-052 $5.00 206-720-053 $5.00 206-720-054 $5.00 206-720-055 $5.00 206-720-056 $5.00 206-720-057 $5.00 206-720-058 $5.00 206-720-059 $5.00 206-720-060 $5.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-720-061 $5.00 206-720-062 $5.00 206-720-063 $5.00 206-720-064 $5.00 206-720-065 $5.00 206-720-066 $5.00 206-720-067 $5.00 206-720-068 $5.00 206-720-069 $5.00 206-720-070 $5.00 206-720-071 $5.00 206-720-072 $5.00 206-720-073 $5.00 206-720-074 $5.00 206-720-075 $5.00 206-720-076 $5.00 206-720-077 $5.00 206-720-078 $5.00 206-660-001 $5.00 206-660-002 $5.00 206-660-003 $5.00 206-660-004 $5.00 206-660-005 $5.00 206-660-006 $5.00 206-660-007 $5.00 206-660-008 $5.00 206-660-009 $5.00 206-660-010 $5.00 206-660-011 $5.00 206-660-012 $5.00 206-660-013 $5.00 206-660-014 $5.00 206-660-015 $5.00 206-660-016 $5.00 206-660-017 $5.00 206-660-018 $5.00 206-660-019 $5.00 206-660-020 $5.00 206-660-021 $5.00 206-660-022 $5.00 206-660-023 $5.00 206-660-024 $5.00 206-660-025 $5.00 206-660-026 $5.00 206-660-027 $5.00 206-660-028 $5.00 206-660-029 $5.00 206-660-030 $5.00 206-660-031 $5.00 206-730-001 $5.00 206-730-002 $5.00 206-730-003 $5.00 206-730-004 $5.00 206-730-005 $5.00 206-730-006 $5.00 206-730-007 $5.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-730-008 $5.00 206-730-009 $5.00 206-730-010 $5.00 206-730-011 $5.00 206-730-012 $5.00 206-730-013 $5.00 206-730-014 $5.00 206-730-015 $5.00 206-730-016 $5.00 206-730-017 $5.00 206-730-018 $5.00 206-730-019 $5.00 206-730-020 $5.00 206-730-021 $5.00 206-730-022 $5.00 206-730-023 $5.00 206-730-024 $5.00 206-730-025 $5.00 206-730-026 $5.00 206-730-030 $5.00 206-730-031 $5.00 206-730-032 $5.00 206-730-033 $5.00 206-730-034 $5.00 206-730-035 $5.00 206-730-036 $5.00 206-730-037 $5.00 206-730-038 $5.00 206-730-039 $5.00 206-730-040 $5.00 206-730-041 $5.00 206-730-042 $5.00 206-730-043 $5.00 206-730-044 $5.00 206-730-045 $5.00 206-730-046 $5.00 206-730-047 $5.00 206-730-048 $5.00 206-730-049 $5.00 206-740-001 $5.00 206-740-002 $5.00 206-740-003 $5.00 206-740-004 $5.00 206-740-005 $5.00 206-740-006 $5.00 206-740-007 $5.00 206-740-008 $5.00 206-740-009 $5.00 206-740-010 $5.00 206-740-011 $5.00 206-740-012 $5.00 206-740-013 $5.00 206-740-014 $5.00 206-740-015 $5.00 206-740-016 $5.00 206-740-017 $5.00 95 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 680 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 69 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2871 NL LEVY CODE: Alamo Creek - Danville Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-740-018 $5.00 206-740-019 $5.00 206-740-020 $5.00 206-740-021 $5.00 206-740-022 $5.00 206-740-023 $5.00 206-740-024 $5.00 206-740-025 $5.00 206-740-026 $5.00 206-740-027 $5.00 206-740-028 $5.00 206-740-029 $5.00 206-750-001 $5.00 206-750-002 $5.00 206-750-003 $5.00 206-750-004 $5.00 206-750-005 $5.00 206-750-006 $5.00 206-750-007 $5.00 206-750-008 $5.00 206-750-009 $5.00 206-750-010 $5.00 206-750-011 $5.00 206-750-012 $5.00 206-750-013 $5.00 206-750-014 $5.00 206-750-015 $5.00 206-750-016 $5.00 206-750-017 $5.00 206-750-018 $5.00 206-750-019 $5.00 206-750-020 $5.00 206-750-021 $5.00 206-750-022 $5.00 206-750-023 $5.00 206-750-024 $5.00 206-750-025 $5.00 206-750-026 $5.00 206-750-027 $5.00 206-750-028 $5.00 206-750-029 $5.00 206-750-030 $5.00 206-750-031 $5.00 206-750-032 $5.00 206-750-033 $5.00 206-750-034 $5.00 206-750-035 $5.00 206-750-036 $5.00 206-750-037 $5.00 206-750-038 $5.00 206-750-039 $5.00 206-750-040 $5.00 206-750-041 $5.00 206-750-042 $5.00 206-750-043 $5.00 206-750-044 $5.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-750-045 $5.00 206-750-046 $5.00 206-750-047 $5.00 206-750-048 $5.00 206-750-049 $5.00 206-750-050 $5.00 206-750-051 $5.00 206-750-052 $5.00 206-750-053 $5.00 206-750-054 $5.00 206-750-055 $5.00 206-750-056 $5.00 206-750-057 $5.00 206-750-058 $5.00 206-750-059 $5.00 206-750-060 $5.00 206-750-061 $5.00 206-750-062 $5.00 206-750-063 $5.00 206-750-064 $5.00 206-750-065 $5.00 206-750-066 $5.00 206-750-067 $5.00 206-750-068 $5.00 206-750-069 $5.00 206-750-070 $5.00 206-750-071 $5.00 206-750-072 $5.00 206-750-073 $5.00 206-750-074 $5.00 206-750-075 $5.00 206-750-076 $5.00 206-750-077 $5.00 206-750-078 $5.00 206-750-079 $5.00 206-750-080 $5.00 206-750-081 $5.00 206-750-082 $5.00 206-750-083 $5.00 206-750-084 $5.00 206-750-085 $5.00 206-750-086 $5.00 206-750-087 $5.00 206-750-088 $5.00 206-750-089 $5.00 206-750-090 $5.00 206-030-082 $150.00 206-030-083 $6.60 206-030-085 $397.50 206-760-001 $2.50 206-760-002 $2.50 206-760-003 $2.50 206-760-004 $2.50 206-760-005 $2.50 206-760-006 $2.50 206-760-007 $2.50 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-760-008 $2.50 206-760-009 $2.50 206-760-010 $2.50 206-760-011 $2.50 206-760-012 $2.50 206-760-013 $2.50 206-760-014 $2.50 206-760-015 $2.50 206-760-016 $2.50 206-760-017 $2.50 206-760-018 $2.50 206-760-019 $2.50 206-760-020 $2.50 206-760-021 $2.50 206-770-001 $2.50 206-770-002 $2.50 206-770-003 $2.50 206-770-004 $2.50 206-770-005 $2.50 206-770-006 $2.50 206-770-007 $2.50 206-770-008 $2.50 206-770-009 $2.50 206-770-010 $2.50 206-770-011 $2.50 206-770-012 $2.50 206-770-013 $2.50 206-770-014 $2.50 206-770-015 $2.50 206-770-016 $2.50 206-770-017 $2.50 206-770-018 $2.50 206-770-019 $2.50 206-770-020 $2.50 206-770-021 $2.50 206-770-022 $2.50 206-770-023 $2.50 206-770-024 $2.50 206-770-025 $2.50 206-770-026 $2.50 206-770-027 $2.50 206-780-001 $2.50 206-780-002 $2.50 206-780-003 $2.50 206-780-004 $2.50 206-780-005 $2.50 206-780-006 $2.50 206-780-007 $2.50 206-780-008 $2.50 206-780-009 $2.50 206-780-010 $2.50 206-780-011 $2.50 206-780-012 $2.50 206-780-013 $2.50 206-780-014 $2.50 206-780-015 $2.50 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-780-016 $2.50 206-780-017 $2.50 206-780-018 $2.50 206-790-001 $2.50 206-790-002 $2.50 206-790-003 $2.50 206-790-004 $2.50 206-790-005 $2.50 206-790-006 $2.50 206-790-007 $2.50 206-790-008 $2.50 206-790-009 $2.50 206-790-010 $2.50 206-790-011 $2.50 206-790-012 $5.00 206-790-013 $5.00 206-790-014 $5.00 206-790-015 $2.50 206-790-016 $2.50 206-790-017 $2.50 206-790-018 $2.50 206-790-019 $2.50 206-790-020 $2.50 206-790-021 $2.50 206-790-022 $2.50 206-790-023 $2.50 206-790-024 $2.50 206-790-025 $2.50 206-790-026 $2.50 206-790-027 $2.50 206-790-028 $2.50 206-790-029 $2.50 206-730-050 $5.00 206-730-051 $5.00 206-730-052 $5.00 206-800-001 $2.50 206-800-002 $2.50 206-800-003 $5.00 206-800-004 $5.00 206-800-005 $5.00 206-800-006 $5.00 206-800-007 $5.00 206-800-008 $5.00 206-800-009 $5.00 206-800-010 $5.00 206-800-011 $5.00 206-800-012 $5.00 206-800-013 $5.00 206-800-014 $5.00 206-800-015 $2.50 206-800-016 $2.50 206-800-017 $2.50 206-800-018 $2.50 206-800-019 $2.50 206-800-020 $2.50 206-800-021 $2.50 96 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 681 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 69 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2871 NL LEVY CODE: Alamo Creek - Danville Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-800-022 $2.50 206-800-023 $2.50 206-800-024 $2.50 206-800-025 $2.50 206-800-026 $2.50 206-800-027 $2.50 206-800-028 $2.50 206-800-029 $2.50 206-800-030 $2.50 206-800-031 $2.50 206-800-032 $5.00 206-800-033 $5.00 206-800-034 $5.00 206-800-035 $5.00 206-800-036 $5.00 206-800-037 $5.00 206-800-038 $5.00 206-800-039 $5.00 206-800-040 $5.00 206-800-041 $5.00 206-800-042 $5.00 206-800-043 $5.00 206-800-044 $5.00 206-800-045 $5.00 206-800-046 $2.50 206-800-047 $2.50 206-800-048 $2.50 206-800-049 $2.50 206-800-050 $2.50 206-800-051 $5.00 206-800-052 $5.00 206-800-053 $5.00 206-800-054 $2.50 206-800-055 $2.50 206-800-056 $2.50 206-800-057 $5.00 206-800-058 $5.00 206-800-059 $2.50 206-800-060 $2.50 206-800-061 $2.50 206-800-062 $2.50 206-800-063 $2.50 206-800-064 $2.50 206-800-065 $2.50 206-800-066 $2.50 206-800-067 $2.50 206-810-001 $2.50 206-810-002 $2.50 206-810-003 $2.50 206-810-004 $2.50 206-810-005 $5.00 206-810-006 $5.00 206-810-007 $5.00 206-810-008 $5.00 206-810-009 $5.00 206-810-010 $5.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-810-011 $5.00 206-810-012 $5.00 206-810-013 $5.00 206-810-014 $5.00 206-810-015 $5.00 206-810-016 $5.00 206-810-017 $5.00 206-810-018 $5.00 206-810-019 $5.00 206-810-020 $5.00 206-810-021 $5.00 206-810-022 $5.00 206-810-023 $5.00 206-810-024 $5.00 206-810-025 $5.00 206-810-026 $5.00 206-810-027 $5.00 206-810-028 $5.00 206-810-029 $2.50 206-810-030 $2.50 206-810-031 $2.50 206-820-001 $2.50 206-820-002 $2.50 206-820-003 $2.50 206-820-004 $2.50 206-820-005 $2.50 206-820-006 $2.50 206-820-007 $2.50 206-820-008 $2.50 206-820-009 $2.50 206-820-010 $2.50 206-820-011 $2.50 206-820-012 $2.50 206-820-013 $2.50 206-820-014 $2.50 206-820-015 $2.50 206-820-016 $2.50 206-820-017 $2.50 206-820-018 $2.50 206-820-019 $2.50 206-820-020 $2.50 206-820-021 $2.50 206-820-022 $2.50 206-820-023 $2.50 206-820-024 $2.50 206-820-025 $2.50 206-820-026 $2.50 206-820-027 $2.50 206-820-028 $2.50 206-820-029 $2.50 206-820-030 $2.50 206-820-031 $2.50 206-820-032 $2.50 206-820-033 $2.50 206-820-034 $2.50 206-820-035 $2.50 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-820-036 $2.50 206-820-037 $2.50 206-820-038 $2.50 206-820-039 $2.50 206-820-040 $2.50 206-820-041 $2.50 206-820-042 $2.50 206-820-043 $2.50 206-820-044 $2.50 206-820-045 $2.50 206-820-046 $2.50 206-820-047 $2.50 206-820-048 $2.50 206-820-049 $2.50 206-820-050 $2.50 206-820-051 $2.50 206-820-052 $2.50 206-820-053 $2.50 206-820-054 $2.50 206-820-055 $2.50 206-820-056 $2.50 206-820-057 $2.50 206-820-058 $2.50 206-820-059 $2.50 206-820-060 $2.50 206-820-061 $2.50 810Total Parcels: $3,781.60 Total Assessment: 97 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 682 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 70 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2885 M2 LEVY CODE: Intervening Properties Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-610-001 $175.00 206-610-002 $175.00 206-610-003 $175.00 206-610-004 $175.00 206-610-005 $175.00 206-610-006 $175.00 206-610-007 $175.00 206-610-008 $175.00 206-610-009 $175.00 206-610-010 $175.00 206-610-011 $175.00 206-610-012 $175.00 206-610-013 $175.00 206-610-014 $175.00 206-610-015 $175.00 206-610-016 $175.00 206-610-017 $175.00 206-610-018 $175.00 206-610-019 $175.00 206-610-020 $175.00 206-610-021 $175.00 206-610-022 $175.00 206-610-023 $175.00 206-610-024 $175.00 206-610-025 $175.00 206-610-026 $175.00 206-610-027 $175.00 206-610-028 $175.00 206-610-029 $175.00 206-610-030 $175.00 206-610-031 $175.00 206-610-032 $175.00 206-610-033 $175.00 206-610-034 $175.00 206-610-035 $175.00 206-610-036 $175.00 206-610-037 $175.00 206-610-038 $175.00 206-610-039 $175.00 206-620-001 $175.00 206-620-002 $175.00 206-620-003 $175.00 206-620-004 $175.00 206-620-005 $175.00 206-620-006 $175.00 206-620-007 $175.00 206-620-008 $175.00 206-620-009 $175.00 206-620-010 $175.00 206-620-011 $175.00 206-620-012 $175.00 206-620-013 $175.00 206-620-014 $175.00 206-620-015 $175.00 206-620-016 $175.00 206-620-017 $175.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-620-018 $175.00 206-620-019 $175.00 206-620-020 $175.00 206-620-022 $175.00 206-620-023 $175.00 206-620-024 $175.00 206-620-025 $175.00 206-620-026 $175.00 206-620-027 $175.00 206-620-028 $175.00 206-620-029 $175.00 206-620-030 $175.00 206-620-031 $175.00 206-620-032 $175.00 206-620-033 $175.00 206-620-034 $175.00 206-620-035 $175.00 206-620-036 $175.00 206-620-037 $175.00 206-620-038 $175.00 206-620-039 $175.00 206-620-040 $175.00 206-620-041 $175.00 206-620-042 $175.00 206-620-043 $175.00 206-620-044 $175.00 206-620-045 $175.00 206-620-046 $175.00 206-620-047 $175.00 206-620-048 $175.00 206-620-049 $175.00 206-620-050 $175.00 206-620-051 $175.00 206-620-052 $175.00 206-620-053 $175.00 206-620-054 $175.00 206-620-055 $175.00 206-620-056 $175.00 206-630-001 $175.00 206-630-002 $175.00 206-630-003 $175.00 206-630-004 $175.00 206-630-005 $175.00 206-630-006 $175.00 206-630-007 $175.00 206-630-008 $175.00 206-630-009 $175.00 206-630-010 $175.00 206-630-011 $175.00 206-630-012 $175.00 206-630-013 $175.00 206-630-014 $175.00 206-630-015 $175.00 206-630-016 $175.00 206-630-017 $175.00 206-630-018 $175.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-630-019 $175.00 206-630-020 $175.00 206-630-021 $175.00 206-630-022 $175.00 206-630-023 $175.00 206-630-024 $175.00 206-630-025 $175.00 206-630-026 $175.00 206-630-027 $175.00 206-630-028 $175.00 206-630-029 $175.00 206-630-030 $175.00 206-630-031 $175.00 206-630-032 $175.00 206-630-033 $175.00 206-630-034 $175.00 206-630-035 $175.00 206-630-036 $175.00 206-630-037 $175.00 206-630-038 $175.00 206-630-039 $175.00 206-630-040 $175.00 206-630-041 $175.00 206-630-042 $175.00 206-630-043 $175.00 206-630-044 $175.00 206-630-045 $175.00 206-630-046 $175.00 206-630-047 $175.00 206-630-048 $175.00 206-630-049 $175.00 206-630-050 $175.00 206-630-051 $175.00 206-630-052 $175.00 206-640-001 $175.00 206-640-002 $175.00 206-640-003 $175.00 206-640-004 $175.00 206-640-005 $175.00 206-640-006 $175.00 206-640-007 $175.00 206-640-008 $175.00 206-640-009 $175.00 206-640-010 $175.00 206-640-011 $175.00 206-640-012 $175.00 206-640-013 $175.00 206-640-014 $175.00 206-640-015 $175.00 206-640-016 $175.00 206-640-017 $175.00 206-640-018 $175.00 206-640-019 $175.00 206-640-020 $175.00 206-640-021 $175.00 206-640-022 $175.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-640-023 $175.00 206-640-024 $175.00 206-640-025 $175.00 206-640-026 $175.00 206-640-027 $175.00 206-640-028 $175.00 206-640-029 $175.00 206-640-030 $175.00 206-640-031 $175.00 206-640-032 $175.00 206-640-033 $175.00 206-640-034 $175.00 206-640-035 $175.00 206-580-001 $175.00 206-580-002 $175.00 206-580-003 $175.00 206-580-004 $175.00 206-580-005 $175.00 206-580-006 $175.00 206-580-007 $175.00 206-580-008 $175.00 206-580-009 $175.00 206-580-010 $175.00 206-580-011 $175.00 206-580-012 $175.00 206-580-013 $175.00 206-580-014 $175.00 206-580-015 $175.00 206-580-016 $175.00 206-580-017 $175.00 206-580-018 $175.00 206-580-019 $175.00 206-580-020 $175.00 206-580-021 $175.00 206-580-022 $175.00 206-580-023 $175.00 206-580-024 $175.00 206-580-025 $175.00 206-580-026 $175.00 206-580-027 $175.00 206-580-028 $175.00 206-580-029 $175.00 206-580-030 $175.00 206-580-031 $175.00 206-580-032 $175.00 206-580-033 $175.00 206-580-034 $175.00 206-580-035 $175.00 206-580-037 $8,400.00 206-590-001 $175.00 206-590-002 $175.00 206-590-003 $175.00 206-590-004 $175.00 206-590-005 $175.00 206-590-006 $175.00 206-590-007 $175.00 98 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 683 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 70 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2885 M2 LEVY CODE: Intervening Properties Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-590-008 $175.00 206-590-009 $175.00 206-590-010 $175.00 206-590-011 $175.00 206-590-012 $175.00 206-590-013 $175.00 206-590-014 $175.00 206-590-015 $175.00 206-590-016 $175.00 206-590-017 $175.00 206-590-018 $175.00 206-590-019 $175.00 206-590-020 $175.00 206-590-021 $175.00 206-590-022 $175.00 206-590-023 $175.00 206-590-024 $175.00 206-590-025 $175.00 206-590-026 $175.00 206-590-027 $175.00 206-590-028 $175.00 206-590-029 $175.00 206-590-030 $175.00 206-590-031 $175.00 206-590-032 $175.00 206-590-033 $175.00 206-590-034 $175.00 206-590-035 $175.00 206-590-036 $175.00 206-590-037 $175.00 206-590-038 $175.00 206-590-039 $175.00 206-590-040 $175.00 206-590-041 $175.00 206-590-042 $175.00 206-590-043 $175.00 206-590-044 $175.00 206-590-045 $175.00 206-590-046 $175.00 206-590-047 $175.00 206-590-048 $175.00 206-590-049 $175.00 206-590-050 $175.00 206-590-051 $175.00 206-590-052 $175.00 206-590-053 $175.00 206-590-054 $175.00 206-590-055 $175.00 206-590-056 $175.00 206-590-057 $175.00 206-590-058 $175.00 206-590-059 $175.00 206-590-060 $175.00 206-590-061 $175.00 206-590-062 $175.00 206-590-063 $175.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-590-064 $175.00 206-590-065 $175.00 206-590-066 $175.00 206-590-067 $175.00 206-590-068 $175.00 206-590-069 $175.00 206-590-070 $175.00 206-590-071 $175.00 206-590-072 $175.00 206-590-073 $175.00 206-590-074 $175.00 206-590-075 $175.00 206-590-076 $175.00 206-590-077 $175.00 206-590-078 $175.00 206-590-079 $175.00 206-590-080 $175.00 206-590-081 $175.00 206-590-082 $175.00 206-590-083 $175.00 206-590-084 $175.00 206-590-085 $175.00 206-590-086 $175.00 206-590-087 $175.00 206-590-088 $175.00 206-590-089 $175.00 206-590-090 $175.00 206-600-001 $175.00 206-600-002 $175.00 206-600-003 $175.00 206-600-004 $175.00 206-600-005 $175.00 206-600-006 $175.00 206-600-007 $175.00 206-600-008 $175.00 206-600-009 $175.00 206-600-010 $175.00 206-600-011 $175.00 206-600-012 $175.00 206-600-013 $175.00 206-600-014 $175.00 206-600-015 $175.00 206-600-016 $175.00 206-600-017 $175.00 206-600-018 $175.00 206-600-019 $175.00 206-600-020 $175.00 206-600-021 $175.00 206-600-022 $175.00 206-600-023 $175.00 206-600-024 $175.00 206-600-025 $175.00 206-600-026 $175.00 206-600-027 $175.00 206-600-028 $175.00 206-600-029 $175.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-600-030 $175.00 206-600-031 $175.00 206-600-032 $175.00 206-600-033 $175.00 206-600-034 $175.00 206-600-035 $175.00 206-600-036 $175.00 206-600-037 $175.00 206-600-038 $175.00 206-600-039 $175.00 206-600-040 $175.00 206-600-041 $175.00 206-600-042 $175.00 206-600-043 $175.00 206-600-044 $175.00 206-600-045 $175.00 206-600-046 $175.00 206-600-047 $175.00 206-600-048 $175.00 206-600-049 $175.00 206-600-050 $175.00 206-600-051 $175.00 206-600-052 $175.00 206-600-053 $175.00 206-600-054 $175.00 206-600-055 $175.00 206-600-056 $175.00 206-600-057 $175.00 206-600-058 $175.00 206-600-059 $175.00 206-600-060 $175.00 206-600-061 $175.00 206-600-062 $175.00 206-600-063 $175.00 206-600-064 $175.00 206-600-065 $175.00 206-600-066 $175.00 206-600-067 $175.00 206-600-068 $175.00 206-600-069 $175.00 206-600-070 $175.00 206-600-071 $175.00 206-620-058 $175.00 379Total Parcels: $74,550.00 Total Assessment: 99 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 684 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 71 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2886 MG LEVY CODE: Diablo Vista Ballfields Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-580-001 $108.00 206-580-002 $108.00 206-580-003 $108.00 206-580-004 $108.00 206-580-005 $108.00 206-580-006 $108.00 206-580-007 $108.00 206-580-008 $108.00 206-580-009 $108.00 206-580-010 $108.00 206-580-011 $108.00 206-580-012 $108.00 206-580-013 $108.00 206-580-014 $108.00 206-580-015 $108.00 206-580-016 $108.00 206-580-017 $108.00 206-580-018 $108.00 206-580-019 $108.00 206-580-020 $108.00 206-580-021 $108.00 206-580-022 $108.00 206-580-023 $108.00 206-580-024 $108.00 206-580-025 $108.00 206-580-026 $108.00 206-580-027 $108.00 206-580-028 $108.00 206-580-029 $108.00 206-580-030 $108.00 206-580-031 $108.00 206-580-032 $108.00 206-580-033 $108.00 206-580-034 $108.00 206-580-035 $108.00 206-590-001 $108.00 206-590-002 $108.00 206-590-003 $108.00 206-590-004 $108.00 206-590-005 $108.00 206-590-006 $108.00 206-590-007 $108.00 206-590-008 $108.00 206-590-009 $108.00 206-590-010 $108.00 206-590-011 $108.00 206-590-012 $108.00 206-590-013 $108.00 206-590-014 $108.00 206-590-015 $108.00 206-590-016 $108.00 206-590-017 $108.00 206-590-018 $108.00 206-590-019 $108.00 206-590-020 $108.00 206-590-021 $108.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-590-022 $108.00 206-590-023 $108.00 206-590-024 $108.00 206-590-025 $108.00 206-590-026 $108.00 206-590-027 $108.00 206-590-028 $108.00 206-590-029 $108.00 206-590-030 $108.00 206-590-031 $108.00 206-590-032 $108.00 206-590-033 $108.00 206-590-034 $108.00 206-590-035 $108.00 206-590-036 $108.00 206-590-037 $108.00 206-590-038 $108.00 206-590-039 $108.00 206-590-040 $108.00 206-590-041 $108.00 206-590-042 $108.00 206-590-043 $108.00 206-590-044 $108.00 206-590-045 $108.00 206-590-046 $108.00 206-590-047 $108.00 206-590-048 $108.00 206-590-049 $108.00 206-590-050 $108.00 206-590-051 $108.00 206-590-052 $108.00 206-590-053 $108.00 206-590-054 $108.00 206-590-055 $108.00 206-590-056 $108.00 206-590-057 $108.00 206-590-058 $108.00 206-590-059 $108.00 206-590-060 $108.00 206-590-061 $108.00 206-590-062 $108.00 206-590-063 $108.00 206-590-064 $108.00 206-590-065 $108.00 206-590-066 $108.00 206-590-067 $108.00 206-590-068 $108.00 206-590-069 $108.00 206-590-070 $108.00 206-590-071 $108.00 206-590-072 $108.00 206-590-073 $108.00 206-590-074 $108.00 206-590-075 $108.00 206-590-076 $108.00 206-590-077 $108.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-590-078 $108.00 206-590-079 $108.00 206-590-080 $108.00 206-590-081 $108.00 206-590-082 $108.00 206-590-083 $108.00 206-590-084 $108.00 206-590-085 $108.00 206-590-086 $108.00 206-590-087 $108.00 206-590-088 $108.00 206-590-089 $108.00 206-590-090 $108.00 206-600-001 $108.00 206-600-002 $108.00 206-600-003 $108.00 206-600-004 $108.00 206-600-005 $108.00 206-600-006 $108.00 206-600-007 $108.00 206-600-008 $108.00 206-600-009 $108.00 206-600-010 $108.00 206-600-011 $108.00 206-600-012 $108.00 206-600-013 $108.00 206-600-014 $108.00 206-600-015 $108.00 206-600-016 $108.00 206-600-017 $108.00 206-600-018 $108.00 206-600-019 $108.00 206-600-020 $108.00 206-600-021 $108.00 206-600-022 $108.00 206-600-023 $108.00 206-600-024 $108.00 206-600-025 $108.00 206-600-026 $108.00 206-600-027 $108.00 206-600-028 $108.00 206-600-029 $108.00 206-600-030 $108.00 206-600-031 $108.00 206-600-032 $108.00 206-600-033 $108.00 206-600-034 $108.00 206-600-035 $108.00 206-600-036 $108.00 206-600-037 $108.00 206-600-038 $108.00 206-600-039 $108.00 206-600-040 $108.00 206-600-041 $108.00 206-600-042 $108.00 206-600-043 $108.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-600-044 $108.00 206-600-045 $108.00 206-600-046 $108.00 206-600-047 $108.00 206-600-048 $108.00 206-600-049 $108.00 206-600-050 $108.00 206-600-051 $108.00 206-600-052 $108.00 206-600-053 $108.00 206-600-054 $108.00 206-600-055 $108.00 206-600-056 $108.00 206-600-057 $108.00 206-600-058 $108.00 206-600-059 $108.00 206-600-060 $108.00 206-600-061 $108.00 206-600-062 $108.00 206-600-063 $108.00 206-600-064 $108.00 206-600-065 $108.00 206-600-066 $108.00 206-600-067 $108.00 206-600-068 $108.00 206-600-069 $108.00 206-600-070 $108.00 206-600-071 $108.00 206-660-001 $108.00 206-660-002 $108.00 206-660-003 $108.00 206-660-004 $108.00 206-660-005 $108.00 206-660-006 $108.00 206-660-007 $108.00 206-660-008 $108.00 206-660-009 $108.00 206-660-010 $108.00 206-660-011 $108.00 206-660-012 $108.00 206-660-013 $108.00 206-660-014 $108.00 206-660-015 $108.00 206-660-016 $108.00 206-660-017 $108.00 206-660-018 $108.00 206-660-019 $108.00 206-660-020 $108.00 206-660-021 $108.00 206-660-022 $108.00 206-660-023 $108.00 206-660-024 $108.00 206-660-025 $108.00 206-660-026 $108.00 206-660-027 $108.00 206-660-028 $108.00 100 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 685 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 71 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2886 MG LEVY CODE: Diablo Vista Ballfields Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-660-029 $108.00 206-660-030 $108.00 206-660-031 $108.00 206-610-001 $108.00 206-610-002 $108.00 206-610-003 $108.00 206-610-004 $108.00 206-610-005 $108.00 206-610-006 $108.00 206-610-007 $108.00 206-610-008 $108.00 206-610-009 $108.00 206-610-010 $108.00 206-610-011 $108.00 206-610-012 $108.00 206-610-013 $108.00 206-610-014 $108.00 206-610-015 $108.00 206-610-016 $108.00 206-610-017 $108.00 206-610-018 $108.00 206-610-019 $108.00 206-610-020 $108.00 206-610-021 $108.00 206-610-022 $108.00 206-610-023 $108.00 206-610-024 $108.00 206-610-025 $108.00 206-610-026 $108.00 206-610-027 $108.00 206-610-028 $108.00 206-610-029 $108.00 206-610-030 $108.00 206-610-031 $108.00 206-610-032 $108.00 206-610-033 $108.00 206-610-034 $108.00 206-610-035 $108.00 206-610-036 $108.00 206-610-037 $108.00 206-610-038 $108.00 206-610-039 $108.00 206-620-001 $108.00 206-620-002 $108.00 206-620-003 $108.00 206-620-004 $108.00 206-620-005 $108.00 206-620-006 $108.00 206-620-007 $108.00 206-620-008 $108.00 206-620-009 $108.00 206-620-010 $108.00 206-620-011 $108.00 206-620-012 $108.00 206-620-013 $108.00 206-620-014 $108.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-620-015 $108.00 206-620-016 $108.00 206-620-017 $108.00 206-620-018 $108.00 206-620-019 $108.00 206-620-020 $108.00 206-620-022 $108.00 206-620-023 $108.00 206-620-024 $108.00 206-620-025 $108.00 206-620-026 $108.00 206-620-027 $108.00 206-620-028 $108.00 206-620-029 $108.00 206-620-030 $108.00 206-620-031 $108.00 206-620-032 $108.00 206-620-033 $108.00 206-620-034 $108.00 206-620-035 $108.00 206-620-036 $108.00 206-620-037 $108.00 206-620-038 $108.00 206-620-039 $108.00 206-620-040 $108.00 206-620-041 $108.00 206-620-042 $108.00 206-620-043 $108.00 206-620-044 $108.00 206-620-045 $108.00 206-620-046 $108.00 206-620-047 $108.00 206-620-048 $108.00 206-620-049 $108.00 206-620-050 $108.00 206-620-051 $108.00 206-620-052 $108.00 206-620-053 $108.00 206-620-054 $108.00 206-620-055 $108.00 206-620-056 $108.00 206-630-001 $108.00 206-630-002 $108.00 206-630-003 $108.00 206-630-004 $108.00 206-630-005 $108.00 206-630-006 $108.00 206-630-007 $108.00 206-630-008 $108.00 206-630-009 $108.00 206-630-010 $108.00 206-630-011 $108.00 206-630-012 $108.00 206-630-013 $108.00 206-630-014 $108.00 206-630-015 $108.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-630-016 $108.00 206-630-017 $108.00 206-630-018 $108.00 206-630-019 $108.00 206-630-020 $108.00 206-630-021 $108.00 206-630-022 $108.00 206-630-023 $108.00 206-630-024 $108.00 206-630-025 $108.00 206-630-026 $108.00 206-630-027 $108.00 206-630-028 $108.00 206-630-029 $108.00 206-630-030 $108.00 206-630-031 $108.00 206-630-032 $108.00 206-630-033 $108.00 206-630-034 $108.00 206-630-035 $108.00 206-630-036 $108.00 206-630-037 $108.00 206-630-038 $108.00 206-630-039 $108.00 206-630-040 $108.00 206-630-041 $108.00 206-630-042 $108.00 206-630-043 $108.00 206-630-044 $108.00 206-630-045 $108.00 206-630-046 $108.00 206-630-047 $108.00 206-630-048 $108.00 206-630-049 $108.00 206-630-050 $108.00 206-630-051 $108.00 206-630-052 $108.00 206-640-001 $108.00 206-640-002 $108.00 206-640-003 $108.00 206-640-004 $108.00 206-640-005 $108.00 206-640-006 $108.00 206-640-007 $108.00 206-640-008 $108.00 206-640-009 $108.00 206-640-010 $108.00 206-640-011 $108.00 206-640-012 $108.00 206-640-013 $108.00 206-640-014 $108.00 206-640-015 $108.00 206-640-016 $108.00 206-640-017 $108.00 206-640-018 $108.00 206-640-019 $108.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-640-020 $108.00 206-640-021 $108.00 206-640-022 $108.00 206-640-023 $108.00 206-640-024 $108.00 206-640-025 $108.00 206-640-026 $108.00 206-640-027 $108.00 206-640-028 $108.00 206-640-029 $108.00 206-640-030 $108.00 206-640-031 $108.00 206-640-032 $108.00 206-640-033 $108.00 206-640-034 $108.00 206-640-035 $108.00 206-660-032 $108.00 206-660-033 $108.00 206-660-034 $108.00 206-660-035 $108.00 206-660-036 $108.00 206-660-037 $108.00 206-660-038 $108.00 206-660-039 $108.00 206-660-040 $108.00 206-660-041 $108.00 206-660-042 $108.00 206-660-043 $108.00 206-660-044 $108.00 206-660-045 $108.00 206-660-046 $108.00 206-660-047 $108.00 206-660-048 $108.00 206-660-049 $108.00 206-660-050 $108.00 206-670-001 $108.00 206-670-002 $108.00 206-670-003 $108.00 206-670-004 $108.00 206-670-005 $108.00 206-670-006 $108.00 206-670-007 $108.00 206-670-008 $108.00 206-670-009 $108.00 206-670-010 $108.00 206-670-011 $108.00 206-670-012 $108.00 206-670-013 $108.00 206-670-014 $108.00 206-670-015 $108.00 206-670-016 $108.00 206-670-017 $108.00 206-670-018 $108.00 206-670-019 $108.00 206-670-020 $108.00 206-670-021 $108.00 101 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 686 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 71 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2886 MG LEVY CODE: Diablo Vista Ballfields Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-670-022 $108.00 206-670-023 $108.00 206-670-024 $108.00 206-670-025 $108.00 206-670-026 $108.00 206-670-027 $108.00 206-670-028 $108.00 206-670-029 $108.00 206-670-030 $108.00 206-670-031 $108.00 206-670-032 $108.00 206-670-033 $108.00 206-670-034 $108.00 206-670-035 $108.00 206-670-036 $108.00 206-670-037 $108.00 206-670-038 $108.00 206-670-039 $108.00 206-670-040 $108.00 206-670-041 $108.00 206-670-042 $108.00 206-670-043 $108.00 206-670-044 $108.00 206-670-045 $108.00 206-670-046 $108.00 206-670-047 $108.00 206-670-048 $108.00 206-670-049 $108.00 206-670-050 $108.00 206-680-001 $108.00 206-680-002 $108.00 206-680-003 $108.00 206-680-004 $108.00 206-680-005 $108.00 206-680-006 $108.00 206-680-007 $108.00 206-680-008 $108.00 206-680-009 $108.00 206-680-010 $108.00 206-680-011 $108.00 206-680-012 $108.00 206-680-013 $108.00 206-680-014 $108.00 206-680-015 $108.00 206-680-016 $108.00 206-680-017 $108.00 206-680-018 $108.00 206-680-019 $108.00 206-680-020 $108.00 206-710-001 $108.00 206-710-002 $108.00 206-710-003 $108.00 206-710-004 $108.00 206-710-005 $108.00 206-710-006 $108.00 206-710-007 $108.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-710-008 $108.00 206-710-009 $108.00 206-710-010 $108.00 206-710-011 $108.00 206-710-012 $108.00 206-710-013 $108.00 206-710-014 $108.00 206-710-015 $108.00 206-710-016 $108.00 206-710-017 $108.00 206-710-018 $108.00 206-710-019 $108.00 206-710-020 $108.00 206-710-021 $108.00 206-710-022 $108.00 206-710-023 $108.00 206-710-024 $108.00 206-710-025 $108.00 206-710-026 $108.00 206-710-027 $108.00 206-710-028 $108.00 206-710-029 $108.00 206-710-030 $108.00 206-710-031 $108.00 206-710-032 $108.00 206-710-033 $108.00 206-710-034 $108.00 206-710-035 $108.00 206-710-036 $108.00 206-710-037 $108.00 206-710-038 $108.00 206-710-039 $108.00 206-710-040 $108.00 206-710-041 $108.00 206-710-042 $108.00 206-710-043 $108.00 206-710-044 $108.00 206-710-045 $108.00 206-710-046 $108.00 206-710-047 $108.00 206-710-048 $108.00 206-710-049 $108.00 206-710-050 $108.00 206-710-051 $108.00 206-710-052 $108.00 206-710-053 $108.00 206-710-054 $108.00 206-710-055 $108.00 206-710-056 $108.00 206-710-057 $108.00 206-710-058 $108.00 206-710-059 $108.00 206-710-060 $108.00 206-720-001 $108.00 206-720-002 $108.00 206-720-003 $108.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-720-004 $108.00 206-720-005 $108.00 206-720-006 $108.00 206-720-007 $108.00 206-720-008 $108.00 206-720-009 $108.00 206-720-010 $108.00 206-720-011 $108.00 206-720-012 $108.00 206-720-013 $108.00 206-720-014 $108.00 206-720-015 $108.00 206-720-016 $108.00 206-720-017 $108.00 206-720-018 $108.00 206-720-019 $108.00 206-720-020 $108.00 206-720-021 $108.00 206-720-022 $108.00 206-720-023 $108.00 206-720-024 $108.00 206-720-025 $108.00 206-720-026 $108.00 206-720-027 $108.00 206-720-028 $108.00 206-720-029 $108.00 206-720-030 $108.00 206-720-031 $108.00 206-720-032 $108.00 206-720-033 $108.00 206-720-034 $108.00 206-720-035 $108.00 206-720-036 $108.00 206-720-037 $108.00 206-720-038 $108.00 206-720-039 $108.00 206-720-040 $108.00 206-720-041 $108.00 206-720-042 $108.00 206-720-043 $108.00 206-720-044 $108.00 206-720-045 $108.00 206-720-046 $108.00 206-720-047 $108.00 206-720-048 $108.00 206-720-049 $108.00 206-720-050 $108.00 206-720-051 $108.00 206-720-052 $108.00 206-720-053 $108.00 206-720-054 $108.00 206-720-055 $108.00 206-720-056 $108.00 206-720-057 $108.00 206-720-058 $108.00 206-720-059 $108.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-720-060 $108.00 206-720-061 $108.00 206-720-062 $108.00 206-720-063 $108.00 206-720-064 $108.00 206-720-065 $108.00 206-720-066 $108.00 206-720-067 $108.00 206-720-068 $108.00 206-720-069 $108.00 206-720-070 $108.00 206-720-071 $108.00 206-720-072 $108.00 206-720-073 $108.00 206-720-074 $108.00 206-720-075 $108.00 206-720-076 $108.00 206-720-077 $108.00 206-720-078 $108.00 206-620-058 $108.00 206-730-001 $108.00 206-730-002 $108.00 206-730-003 $108.00 206-730-004 $108.00 206-730-005 $108.00 206-730-006 $108.00 206-730-007 $108.00 206-730-008 $108.00 206-730-009 $108.00 206-730-010 $108.00 206-730-011 $108.00 206-730-012 $108.00 206-730-013 $108.00 206-730-014 $108.00 206-730-015 $108.00 206-730-016 $108.00 206-730-017 $108.00 206-730-018 $108.00 206-730-019 $108.00 206-730-020 $108.00 206-730-021 $108.00 206-730-022 $108.00 206-730-023 $108.00 206-730-024 $108.00 206-730-025 $108.00 206-730-026 $108.00 206-730-030 $108.00 206-730-031 $108.00 206-730-032 $108.00 206-730-033 $108.00 206-730-034 $108.00 206-730-035 $108.00 206-730-036 $108.00 206-730-037 $108.00 206-730-038 $108.00 206-730-039 $108.00 102 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 687 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 71 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2886 MG LEVY CODE: Diablo Vista Ballfields Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-730-040 $108.00 206-730-041 $108.00 206-730-042 $108.00 206-730-043 $108.00 206-730-044 $108.00 206-730-045 $108.00 206-730-046 $108.00 206-730-047 $108.00 206-730-048 $108.00 206-730-049 $108.00 206-740-001 $108.00 206-740-002 $108.00 206-740-003 $108.00 206-740-004 $108.00 206-740-005 $108.00 206-740-006 $108.00 206-740-007 $108.00 206-740-008 $108.00 206-740-009 $108.00 206-740-010 $108.00 206-740-011 $108.00 206-740-012 $108.00 206-740-013 $108.00 206-740-014 $108.00 206-740-015 $108.00 206-740-016 $108.00 206-740-017 $108.00 206-740-018 $108.00 206-740-019 $108.00 206-740-020 $108.00 206-740-021 $108.00 206-740-022 $108.00 206-740-023 $108.00 206-740-024 $108.00 206-740-025 $108.00 206-740-026 $108.00 206-740-027 $108.00 206-740-028 $108.00 206-740-029 $108.00 206-750-001 $108.00 206-750-002 $108.00 206-750-003 $108.00 206-750-004 $108.00 206-750-005 $108.00 206-750-006 $108.00 206-750-007 $108.00 206-750-008 $108.00 206-750-009 $108.00 206-750-010 $108.00 206-750-011 $108.00 206-750-012 $108.00 206-750-013 $108.00 206-750-014 $108.00 206-750-015 $108.00 206-750-016 $108.00 206-750-017 $108.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-750-018 $108.00 206-750-019 $108.00 206-750-020 $108.00 206-750-021 $108.00 206-750-022 $108.00 206-750-023 $108.00 206-750-024 $108.00 206-750-025 $108.00 206-750-026 $108.00 206-750-027 $108.00 206-750-028 $108.00 206-750-029 $108.00 206-750-030 $108.00 206-750-031 $108.00 206-750-032 $108.00 206-750-033 $108.00 206-750-034 $108.00 206-750-035 $108.00 206-750-036 $108.00 206-750-037 $108.00 206-750-038 $108.00 206-750-039 $108.00 206-750-040 $108.00 206-750-041 $108.00 206-750-042 $108.00 206-750-043 $108.00 206-750-044 $108.00 206-750-045 $108.00 206-750-046 $108.00 206-750-047 $108.00 206-750-048 $108.00 206-750-049 $108.00 206-750-050 $108.00 206-750-051 $108.00 206-750-052 $108.00 206-750-053 $108.00 206-750-054 $108.00 206-750-055 $108.00 206-750-056 $108.00 206-750-057 $108.00 206-750-058 $108.00 206-750-059 $108.00 206-750-060 $108.00 206-750-061 $108.00 206-750-062 $108.00 206-750-063 $108.00 206-750-064 $108.00 206-750-065 $108.00 206-750-066 $108.00 206-750-067 $108.00 206-750-068 $108.00 206-750-069 $108.00 206-750-070 $108.00 206-750-071 $108.00 206-750-072 $108.00 206-750-073 $108.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-750-074 $108.00 206-750-075 $108.00 206-750-076 $108.00 206-750-077 $108.00 206-750-078 $108.00 206-750-079 $108.00 206-750-080 $108.00 206-750-081 $108.00 206-750-082 $108.00 206-750-083 $108.00 206-750-084 $108.00 206-750-085 $108.00 206-750-086 $108.00 206-750-087 $108.00 206-750-088 $108.00 206-750-089 $108.00 206-750-090 $108.00 206-030-085 $8,586.80 206-760-001 $54.00 206-760-002 $54.00 206-760-003 $54.00 206-760-004 $54.00 206-760-005 $54.00 206-760-006 $54.00 206-760-007 $54.00 206-760-008 $54.00 206-760-009 $54.00 206-760-010 $54.00 206-760-011 $54.00 206-760-012 $54.00 206-760-013 $54.00 206-760-014 $54.00 206-760-015 $54.00 206-760-016 $54.00 206-760-017 $54.00 206-760-018 $54.00 206-760-019 $54.00 206-760-020 $54.00 206-760-021 $54.00 206-770-001 $54.00 206-770-002 $54.00 206-770-003 $54.00 206-770-004 $54.00 206-770-005 $54.00 206-770-006 $54.00 206-770-007 $54.00 206-770-008 $54.00 206-770-009 $54.00 206-770-010 $54.00 206-770-011 $54.00 206-770-012 $54.00 206-770-013 $54.00 206-770-014 $54.00 206-770-015 $54.00 206-770-016 $54.00 206-770-017 $54.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-770-018 $54.00 206-770-019 $54.00 206-770-020 $54.00 206-770-021 $54.00 206-770-022 $54.00 206-770-023 $54.00 206-770-024 $54.00 206-770-025 $54.00 206-770-026 $54.00 206-770-027 $54.00 206-780-001 $54.00 206-780-002 $54.00 206-780-003 $54.00 206-780-004 $54.00 206-780-005 $54.00 206-780-006 $54.00 206-780-007 $54.00 206-780-008 $54.00 206-780-009 $54.00 206-780-010 $54.00 206-780-011 $54.00 206-780-012 $54.00 206-780-013 $54.00 206-780-014 $54.00 206-780-015 $54.00 206-780-016 $54.00 206-780-017 $54.00 206-780-018 $54.00 206-790-001 $54.00 206-790-002 $54.00 206-790-003 $54.00 206-790-004 $54.00 206-790-005 $54.00 206-790-006 $54.00 206-790-007 $54.00 206-790-008 $54.00 206-790-009 $54.00 206-790-010 $54.00 206-790-011 $54.00 206-790-012 $108.00 206-790-013 $108.00 206-790-014 $108.00 206-790-015 $54.00 206-790-016 $54.00 206-790-017 $54.00 206-790-018 $54.00 206-790-019 $54.00 206-790-020 $54.00 206-790-021 $54.00 206-790-022 $54.00 206-790-023 $54.00 206-790-024 $54.00 206-790-025 $54.00 206-790-026 $54.00 206-790-027 $54.00 206-790-028 $54.00 103 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 688 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 71 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2886 MG LEVY CODE: Diablo Vista Ballfields Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-790-029 $54.00 206-730-050 $108.00 206-730-051 $108.00 206-730-052 $108.00 206-800-001 $54.00 206-800-002 $54.00 206-800-003 $108.00 206-800-004 $108.00 206-800-005 $108.00 206-800-006 $108.00 206-800-007 $108.00 206-800-008 $108.00 206-800-009 $108.00 206-800-010 $108.00 206-800-011 $108.00 206-800-012 $108.00 206-800-013 $108.00 206-800-014 $108.00 206-800-015 $54.00 206-800-016 $54.00 206-800-017 $54.00 206-800-018 $54.00 206-800-019 $54.00 206-800-020 $54.00 206-800-021 $54.00 206-800-022 $54.00 206-800-023 $54.00 206-800-024 $54.00 206-800-025 $54.00 206-800-026 $54.00 206-800-027 $54.00 206-800-028 $54.00 206-800-029 $54.00 206-800-030 $54.00 206-800-031 $54.00 206-800-032 $108.00 206-800-033 $108.00 206-800-034 $108.00 206-800-035 $108.00 206-800-036 $108.00 206-800-037 $108.00 206-800-038 $108.00 206-800-039 $108.00 206-800-040 $108.00 206-800-041 $108.00 206-800-042 $108.00 206-800-043 $108.00 206-800-044 $108.00 206-800-045 $108.00 206-800-046 $54.00 206-800-047 $54.00 206-800-048 $54.00 206-800-049 $54.00 206-800-050 $54.00 206-800-051 $108.00 206-800-052 $108.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-800-053 $108.00 206-800-054 $54.00 206-800-055 $54.00 206-800-056 $54.00 206-800-057 $108.00 206-800-058 $108.00 206-800-059 $54.00 206-800-060 $54.00 206-800-061 $54.00 206-800-062 $54.00 206-800-063 $54.00 206-800-064 $54.00 206-800-065 $54.00 206-800-066 $54.00 206-800-067 $54.00 206-810-001 $54.00 206-810-002 $54.00 206-810-003 $54.00 206-810-004 $54.00 206-810-005 $108.00 206-810-006 $108.00 206-810-007 $108.00 206-810-008 $108.00 206-810-009 $108.00 206-810-010 $108.00 206-810-011 $108.00 206-810-012 $108.00 206-810-013 $108.00 206-810-014 $108.00 206-810-015 $108.00 206-810-016 $108.00 206-810-017 $108.00 206-810-018 $108.00 206-810-019 $108.00 206-810-020 $108.00 206-810-021 $108.00 206-810-022 $108.00 206-810-023 $108.00 206-810-024 $108.00 206-810-025 $108.00 206-810-026 $108.00 206-810-027 $108.00 206-810-028 $108.00 206-810-029 $54.00 206-810-030 $54.00 206-810-031 $54.00 206-820-001 $54.00 206-820-002 $54.00 206-820-003 $54.00 206-820-004 $54.00 206-820-005 $54.00 206-820-006 $54.00 206-820-007 $54.00 206-820-008 $54.00 206-820-009 $54.00 206-820-010 $54.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-820-011 $54.00 206-820-012 $54.00 206-820-013 $54.00 206-820-014 $54.00 206-820-015 $54.00 206-820-016 $54.00 206-820-017 $54.00 206-820-018 $54.00 206-820-019 $54.00 206-820-020 $54.00 206-820-021 $54.00 206-820-022 $54.00 206-820-023 $54.00 206-820-024 $54.00 206-820-025 $54.00 206-820-026 $54.00 206-820-027 $54.00 206-820-028 $54.00 206-820-029 $54.00 206-820-030 $54.00 206-820-031 $54.00 206-820-032 $54.00 206-820-033 $54.00 206-820-034 $54.00 206-820-035 $54.00 206-820-036 $54.00 206-820-037 $54.00 206-820-038 $54.00 206-820-039 $54.00 206-820-040 $54.00 206-820-041 $54.00 206-820-042 $54.00 206-820-043 $54.00 206-820-044 $54.00 206-820-045 $54.00 206-820-046 $54.00 206-820-047 $54.00 206-820-048 $54.00 206-820-049 $54.00 206-820-050 $54.00 206-820-051 $54.00 206-820-052 $54.00 206-820-053 $54.00 206-820-054 $54.00 206-820-055 $54.00 206-820-056 $54.00 206-820-057 $54.00 206-820-058 $54.00 206-820-059 $54.00 206-820-060 $54.00 206-820-061 $54.00 1059Total Parcels: $112,266.80 Total Assessment: 104 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 689 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 74 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2875 NM LEVY CODE: Bella Flora Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 408-160-016 $1,360.00 408-240-001 $340.00 408-240-002 $340.00 408-240-003 $340.00 408-240-004 $340.00 408-240-005 $340.00 408-240-006 $340.00 408-240-007 $340.00 408-240-008 $340.00 408-240-009 $340.00 408-240-010 $340.00 408-240-011 $340.00 408-240-012 $340.00 408-240-013 $340.00 408-240-014 $340.00 408-240-015 $340.00 408-240-016 $340.00 408-240-017 $340.00 408-240-018 $340.00 408-240-019 $340.00 408-240-020 $340.00 408-240-021 $340.00 408-240-022 $340.00 408-240-023 $340.00 408-240-024 $340.00 408-240-025 $340.00 408-240-026 $340.00 408-240-027 $340.00 408-240-028 $340.00 408-240-029 $340.00 408-240-030 $340.00 408-240-031 $340.00 408-240-032 $340.00 408-240-033 $340.00 408-240-034 $340.00 408-240-035 $340.00 408-240-036 $340.00 408-240-037 $340.00 408-240-038 $340.00 408-240-039 $340.00 408-240-040 $340.00 408-240-041 $340.00 408-240-042 $340.00 408-240-043 $340.00 408-240-044 $340.00 408-240-045 $340.00 408-240-046 $340.00 408-240-047 $340.00 408-240-048 $340.00 408-240-049 $340.00 408-240-050 $340.00 408-240-051 $340.00 408-240-052 $340.00 408-240-053 $340.00 408-240-054 $340.00 408-240-055 $340.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 408-240-056 $340.00 408-240-057 $340.00 408-240-058 $340.00 408-240-059 $340.00 408-240-060 $340.00 408-240-061 $340.00 408-240-062 $340.00 408-240-063 $340.00 408-240-064 $340.00 408-240-065 $340.00 408-240-066 $340.00 408-240-067 $340.00 408-240-068 $340.00 408-240-069 $340.00 408-240-070 $340.00 408-240-071 $340.00 408-240-072 $340.00 408-240-073 $340.00 408-240-074 $340.00 408-240-075 $340.00 408-240-076 $340.00 408-240-077 $340.00 408-240-078 $340.00 408-240-079 $340.00 408-240-080 $340.00 408-240-081 $340.00 408-240-082 $340.00 408-240-083 $340.00 408-240-084 $340.00 408-240-085 $340.00 408-240-086 $340.00 408-240-087 $340.00 408-240-088 $340.00 408-240-089 $340.00 408-240-090 $340.00 408-240-091 $340.00 408-240-092 $340.00 408-240-093 $340.00 408-240-094 $340.00 408-250-001 $340.00 408-250-002 $340.00 408-250-003 $340.00 408-250-004 $340.00 408-250-005 $340.00 408-250-006 $340.00 408-250-007 $340.00 408-250-008 $340.00 408-250-009 $340.00 408-250-010 $340.00 408-250-011 $340.00 408-250-012 $340.00 408-250-013 $340.00 408-250-014 $340.00 408-250-015 $340.00 408-250-016 $340.00 408-250-017 $340.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 408-250-018 $340.00 408-250-019 $340.00 408-250-020 $340.00 408-250-021 $340.00 408-250-022 $340.00 408-250-023 $340.00 408-250-024 $340.00 408-250-025 $340.00 408-250-026 $340.00 408-250-027 $340.00 408-250-028 $340.00 408-250-029 $340.00 408-250-030 $340.00 408-250-031 $340.00 408-250-032 $340.00 408-250-033 $340.00 408-250-034 $340.00 408-250-035 $340.00 408-250-036 $340.00 408-250-037 $340.00 408-250-038 $340.00 408-250-039 $340.00 408-250-040 $340.00 408-250-041 $340.00 408-250-042 $340.00 408-250-043 $340.00 408-250-044 $340.00 408-250-045 $340.00 408-250-046 $340.00 408-250-047 $340.00 408-250-048 $340.00 408-250-049 $340.00 408-250-050 $340.00 408-250-051 $340.00 408-250-052 $340.00 408-250-053 $340.00 408-250-054 $340.00 408-250-055 $340.00 408-250-056 $340.00 408-250-057 $340.00 408-250-058 $340.00 408-250-059 $340.00 408-250-060 $340.00 408-250-061 $340.00 408-250-062 $340.00 408-250-063 $340.00 408-250-064 $340.00 408-250-065 $340.00 408-250-066 $340.00 408-250-067 $340.00 408-250-068 $340.00 408-250-069 $340.00 408-250-070 $340.00 408-250-071 $340.00 408-250-072 $340.00 408-250-073 $340.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 408-250-074 $340.00 408-250-075 $340.00 408-250-076 $340.00 408-250-077 $340.00 408-250-078 $340.00 408-250-079 $340.00 408-170-072 $170.00 408-180-010 $170.00 176Total Parcels: $60,520.00 Total Assessment: 105 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 690 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 75 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 2889 N5 LEVY CODE: Belmont Terrace Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 161-580-001 $3.74 161-580-002 $3.74 161-580-003 $3.74 161-580-004 $3.74 161-580-005 $3.74 161-580-006 $3.74 161-580-007 $3.74 161-580-008 $3.74 161-580-009 $3.74 161-580-010 $3.74 161-580-011 $3.74 161-580-012 $3.74 161-580-013 $3.74 161-580-014 $3.74 161-580-015 $3.74 161-580-016 $3.74 161-580-017 $3.74 161-580-018 $3.74 161-580-019 $3.74 161-580-020 $3.74 161-580-021 $3.74 161-580-022 $3.74 161-580-023 $3.74 161-580-024 $3.74 161-580-025 $3.74 161-580-026 $3.74 161-580-027 $3.74 161-580-028 $3.74 161-580-029 $3.74 161-580-030 $3.74 161-580-031 $3.74 161-580-032 $3.74 161-580-033 $3.74 161-580-034 $3.74 161-580-035 $3.74 161-580-036 $3.74 161-580-037 $3.74 161-580-038 $3.74 161-580-039 $3.74 161-580-040 $3.74 161-580-041 $3.74 161-580-042 $3.74 161-580-043 $3.74 161-580-044 $3.74 161-580-045 $3.74 161-580-046 $3.74 161-580-047 $3.74 161-580-048 $3.74 161-580-049 $3.74 161-580-050 $3.74 161-580-051 $3.74 161-580-052 $3.74 161-580-053 $3.74 161-580-054 $3.74 161-580-055 $3.74 161-580-056 $3.74 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 161-580-057 $3.74 161-580-058 $3.74 161-580-059 $3.74 161-580-060 $3.74 161-580-061 $3.74 161-580-062 $3.74 161-580-063 $3.74 161-580-064 $3.74 161-580-065 $3.74 161-580-066 $3.74 161-580-067 $3.74 161-580-068 $3.74 161-580-069 $3.74 161-580-070 $3.74 161-580-071 $3.74 161-580-072 $3.74 161-580-073 $3.74 161-580-074 $3.74 161-580-075 $3.74 161-580-076 $3.74 161-580-077 $3.74 161-580-078 $3.74 161-580-079 $3.74 161-580-080 $3.74 161-580-081 $3.74 161-580-082 $3.74 161-580-083 $3.74 161-580-084 $3.74 161-580-085 $3.74 161-580-086 $3.74 161-580-087 $3.74 161-580-088 $3.74 161-580-089 $3.74 161-580-090 $3.74 161-580-091 $3.74 161-580-092 $3.74 161-580-093 $3.74 161-580-094 $3.74 161-580-095 $3.74 161-580-096 $3.74 161-580-097 $3.74 161-580-098 $3.74 161-580-099 $3.74 161-580-100 $3.74 161-580-101 $3.74 161-580-102 $3.74 161-580-103 $3.74 161-580-104 $3.74 161-580-105 $3.74 161-580-106 $3.74 161-580-107 $3.74 161-580-108 $3.74 161-580-109 $3.74 161-580-110 $3.74 161-580-111 $3.74 161-580-112 $3.74 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 161-580-113 $3.74 161-580-114 $3.74 161-580-115 $3.74 161-580-116 $3.74 161-580-117 $3.74 161-580-118 $3.74 161-580-119 $3.74 161-580-120 $3.74 161-580-121 $3.74 161-580-122 $3.74 161-580-123 $3.74 161-580-124 $3.74 161-580-125 $3.74 161-580-126 $3.74 161-580-127 $3.74 161-580-128 $3.74 159-510-001 $3.74 159-510-002 $3.74 159-510-003 $3.74 159-510-004 $3.74 159-510-005 $3.74 159-510-006 $3.74 159-510-007 $3.74 159-510-008 $3.74 159-510-009 $3.74 159-510-010 $3.74 159-510-011 $3.74 159-510-012 $3.74 159-510-013 $3.74 159-510-014 $3.74 159-510-015 $3.74 159-510-016 $3.74 159-510-017 $3.74 159-510-018 $3.74 159-510-019 $3.74 159-510-020 $3.74 159-510-021 $3.74 159-510-022 $3.74 159-510-023 $3.74 159-510-024 $3.74 159-510-025 $3.74 159-510-026 $3.74 159-510-027 $3.74 159-510-028 $3.74 159-510-029 $3.74 159-510-030 $3.74 159-510-031 $3.74 159-510-032 $3.74 159-510-033 $3.74 159-510-034 $3.74 159-510-035 $3.74 159-510-036 $3.74 159-510-037 $3.74 159-510-038 $3.74 159-510-039 $3.74 159-510-040 $3.74 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 159-510-041 $3.74 159-510-042 $3.74 159-510-043 $3.74 159-510-044 $3.74 159-510-045 $3.74 159-510-046 $3.74 159-510-047 $3.74 159-520-001 $3.74 159-520-002 $3.74 159-520-003 $3.74 159-520-004 $3.74 159-520-005 $3.74 159-520-006 $3.74 159-520-007 $3.74 159-520-008 $3.74 159-520-009 $3.74 159-520-010 $3.74 159-520-011 $3.74 159-520-012 $3.74 159-520-013 $3.74 159-520-014 $3.74 159-520-015 $3.74 159-520-016 $3.74 159-520-017 $3.74 159-520-018 $3.74 159-520-019 $3.74 159-520-020 $3.74 159-520-021 $3.74 159-520-022 $3.74 159-520-023 $3.74 159-520-024 $3.74 159-520-025 $3.74 159-520-026 $3.74 159-520-027 $3.74 159-520-028 $3.74 159-520-029 $3.74 159-520-030 $3.74 159-520-031 $3.74 159-520-032 $3.74 159-520-033 $3.74 159-520-034 $3.74 159-520-035 $3.74 159-520-036 $3.74 159-520-037 $3.74 159-520-038 $3.74 159-520-039 $3.74 159-520-040 $3.74 159-520-041 $3.74 159-520-042 $3.74 159-230-009 $5.00 159-230-010 $5.00 219Total Parcels: $821.58 Total Assessment: 106 05/17/17N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY17-18\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21617p.dbf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 691 RECOMMENDATION(S): 1. FIND that the extensions of temporary employment for retirees Dr. Ann Harvey, Dr. Domenic Cavallaro, Dr. Gwendolyn Hamilton, and Wendy Mailer are necessary to fill critically needed positions in the Health Services Department; 2. APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the extension of temporary employment of retirees Dr. Ann Harvey, Dr. Domenic Cavallaro, Dr. Gwendolyn Hamilton, and Wendy Mailer for the period continuing through June 30, 2018. FISCAL IMPACT: Upon approval of this request, the total salary cost of the four retirees estimated at $213,120.00, will be funded through the Department's Hospital Enterprise Fund I operating budget. BACKGROUND: The Health Services Department is requesting an extension for the temporary employment of our medical provider retirees, including Exempt Medical Staff-Physicians APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor NO:Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Contact: Jo-Anne Linares, 925-957-5240 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: D. 6 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:Extend Temporary Employment Period for County Retirees in the Health Services Department June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 692 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Dr. Harvey and Dr. Hamilton; Exempt Medical Staff-Dentist Dr. Cavallaro; and former Health Plan Sales/Outreach Manager Wendy Mailer. These retirees have worked since their initial approved 180-day waiver exemption, and the Department is requesting a continuation of their temporary employment in order to meet increased patient volume demand and the continuity of care for Medi-Cal recipients who are re-enrolling in the County's Health Plan. Dr. Harvey was originally hired on September 1, 1994, and retired on July 31, 2014. After 20 years with the County as an Exempt Medical Staff-Physician, she continues her medical practice as a family physician and HIV specialist assigned to the West County Health Clinic. Her temporary employment is critical to seeing increased patient load as there have been continued demand for access to health care as a result from increased Contra Costa Health Plan (CCHP) membership enrollment. Dr. Hamilton was originally hired on May 17, 1989, and retired on June 30, 2016. As an Exempt Medical Staff-Physician, she is providing medical consultation for the California Children's Services (CCS) Program for Public Health. Her temporary employment is critical in ensuring and meeting the complex service requirements of the CCS eligibility criteria for medical services to children up to the age of 21. Dr. Cavallaro was originally hired on May 1, 1977, and retired on March 31, 2016. As an Exempt Medical Staff-Dentist, he is assigned to various health centers in Martinez, Pittsburg, Bay Point and West County to provide critically needed dental care to our patients. In addition, Dr. Cavallaro also provides coverage for those dentists who are on scheduled and unscheduled leaves. His temporary employment is necessary to meet the increased patient load due to continued demand for access to health care and increased CCHP membership. Wendy Mailer was originally hired on September 1, 1994, and retired as the Health Plan Sales/Outreach Manager on October 31, 2013. After 26 years working for the CCHP, Ms. Mailer's work and expertise is vitally important to the requirement for continuity of care for Medi-Cal members who are undergoing re-determination process. In addition, there are changes for the years 2017, 2018, 2019, and 2020 in the Medi-Cal eligibility under the new Federal mandates which may result in losing up to 60,000 Medi-Cal members if the beneficiaries are not properly advised on keeping their Medi-Cal benefits. This can result in a significant financial loss to the health plan and the Department. Ms. Mailer's experience and expertise in working with this population and her coordinated efforts working closely with the Employment and Human Services Department, is critical in maintaining the enrollment of these health plan members. Furthermore, Ms. Mailer is responsible for the maintenance of the CCHP website and the Department's ISITE website with regards to state and federal mandates, and continues to work with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and the Department of Health Services on regulatory matter for CCHP. Due to the increased volume of patient care demand and continuing re-enrollment of members within the County's Health Plan, the Department is requesting to extend the temporary employment of retirees Dr. Harvey, Dr. Hamilton, Dr. Cavallaro, and Wendy Mailer in the Health Services Department. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this action is not approved, the Department will be challenged with providing medical staff providers to meet patient care demand in our health care system, and not have an expert in the re-enrollment process of Medi-Cal members in the County's Health Plan. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 693 RECOMMENDATION(S): ACCEPT the recommendation of the Behavioral Health Services Director to adopt the Mental Health Services Act Three Year Program and Expenditure Plan for Fiscal Years 2017/20. AUTHORIZE the Chair of the Board of Supervisors to sign the attached letter to the Mental Health Services Oversight and Accountability Commission (MHSOAC) to inform the MHSOAC of the Board's approval of the adoption of this Plan. FISCAL IMPACT: Adoption of the Mental Health Services Act Three Year Program and Expenditure Plan, Fiscal Year 2017/20 assures continued MHSA funding for Fiscal Year 2017/18 in the amount of $51,574,742. BACKGROUND: Proposition 63 was passed by California voters in the November 2004 election. Now known as the Mental Health Services Act (MHSA), the legislation provides public mental health funding by imposing an additional one percent tax on individual taxable income in excess of one APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Cynthia Belon, 925-957-5201 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: T Scott, M Wilhelm, Warren Hayes D. 7 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:Mental Health Services Act (Proposition 63): Three Year Program and Expenditure Plan for Fiscal Year 2017/20 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 694 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) million dollars. There are a total of five MHSA components which have been enacted out over time by the State with the goal of creating a better program of mental health services and supports in California’s public mental health systems. The five components include: Community Services and Supports; Prevention and Early Intervention; Workforce Education and Training; Capital Facilities and Technology; and Innovation. There are multiple programs operated within each component. This is a state mandated program under Welfare & Institutions Code. CLERK'S ADDENDUM Speakers: Douglas Dunn, Laura Rettagliata, AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Plan Summary MHSA 3 Year Plan 2017-20 Letter to MHSOAC MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Letter June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 695 MHSA Three Year Program and Expenditure Plan for FY 2017-20 SUMMARY The Mental Health Services Act (MHSA) Three Year Program and Expenditure Plan (Three Year Plan) for Fiscal Years 2017-18 through 2019-20 sets aside $51.6 million for fiscal year 2017-18 in order to fund over 80 programs and plan elements. This is an $8.5 million annual increase in requested budget authority from the current Three Year Plan. This increase will be offset by estimated additional Medi-Cal reimbursement, increase in state MHSA Trust Fund revenue, and use of unspent MHSA funds from previous years. The Three Year Plan includes $37.6 million to fund 39 programs and plan elements in the Community Services and Supports component that will serve approximately 2,000 individuals who are experiencing a serious mental illness. The Prevention and Early Intervention component plans to set aside $8.7 million to fund 26 programs serving approximately 13,000 persons, and are designed to prevent mental illness from becoming severe and debilitating. $2.1 million is budgeted for six Innovative Projects, and $2.5 million is set aside for programs to recruit, train, retain and support our public mental health workforce. Finally, our Capital Facilities/Information Technology component will utilize the remaining funds allocated for implementation of the electronic mental health records project. A data driven Needs Assessment was conducted of public mental health services in Contra Costa County, and an inclusive Community Program Planning Process engaged stakeholders in identifying service gaps, prioritizing community public mental health needs, and suggesting strategies to meet these needs. All identified service gaps and prioritized needs from the Needs Assessment and Community Program Planning Process are referenced and addressed in the Three Year Plan. Significant changes to the Three Year Plan include the following: $1.7 million earmarked for permanent subsidized housing for persons with serious mental illness (Special Needs Housing Program), and introduction of planning for potential use of state funding to be available sometime in fiscal year 2018-19 for the “No Place Like Home” initiative. The No Place Like Home initiative, when implemented, will earmark state level MHSA funds for permanent supportive housing for persons with serious mental illness. $.2 million for start-up funding to establish a 24 bed transitional residential facility for transition age youth at the County’s Oak Grove facility. $2.5 million for expansion of the Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment (EPSDT) program for children to meet new state expanded eligibility requirements, and to meet reform legislation for services to foster children. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 696 $.7 million to expand the county operated First Hope program’s capability to now serve adolescents and young adults experiencing a first psychotic break. $.5 million to support expanding the hours of availability for the County funded mobile response team to respond to children and their families when in crisis. $.5 million to augment and expand the capacity of the County’s Mental; Health Evaluation Team (MHET) in order to field a countywide mobile crisis response intervention for adults experiencing mental health crises. $.7 million to establish two new Innovative Projects; one to bring mental health services to seriously mentally ill adults living in augmented board and care facilities, and one to serve adolescents experiencing mental health and substance abuse disorders. This $.7 million will be offset by the ending of two Innovative Projects that sunset in current fiscal year. $.6 million to establish a family support program consisting of recruiting, training and supervising volunteers to support family members and loved ones of persons experiencing serious emotional disturbance or mental illness. $.2 million to expand various training and staff development initiatives; most notably certifying mental health first aid trainers to partner with first responders and community organizations supporting persons experiencing trauma and violence. $.3 million to establish a locally administered student loan forgiveness program to address identified significant workforce shortages, such as psychiatrists. $1.3 million (or 3%) added to allow for both County and contract operated increases in the cost of doing business. We anticipate that the plan’s proposed total budget spending authority will not need to be reduced in the foreseeable future, and that all MHSA programs and plan elements can be sustained at their proposed level of funding. Section 5848(b) requirements of the California Welfare and Institutions Code have been fulfilled, in that the Draft Three Year Plan has been publicly posted for stakeholder comment for a minimum of thirty days, and on May 3, 2017 the Mental Health Commission hosted a public hearing. All substantive comments and recommendations from this process have been included, and Contra Costa Behavioral Health Administration has addressed in writing any substantive recommendations for revisions. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 697 Contra Costa County Mental Health Services Act Three Year Program and Expenditure Plan Fiscal Year 2017 - 2020 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 698 (Page left intentionally blank) June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 699 Introduction We are pleased to present Contra Costa County Behavioral Health Services (CCBHS) Mental Health Services Act (MHSA) Three Year Program and Expenditure Plan (Three Year Plan) for fiscal years 2017-20. This Three Year Plan starts July 1, 2017, and integrates the components of Community Services and Supports (CSS), Prevention and Early Intervention (PEI), Innovation (INN), Workforce Education and Training (WET), and Capital Facilities/Information Technology (CF/TN). This Three Year Plan describes programs that are funded by MHSA, what they will do, and how much money will be set aside to fund these programs. Also, the Three Year Plan will describe what will be done to evaluate their effectiveness and ensure they meet the intent and requirements of the Mental Health Services Act. California approved Proposition 63 in November, 2004, and the Mental Health Services Act became law. The Act provides significant additional funding to the existing public mental health system, and combines prevention services with a full range of integrated services to treat the whole person. With the goal of wellness, recovery and self-sufficiency, the intent of the law is to reach out and include those most in need and those who have been traditionally underserved. Services are to be consumer driven, family focused, based in the community, culturally and linguistically competent, and integrated with other appropriate health and social services. Funding is to be provided at sufficient levels to ensure that counties can provide each child, transition age youth, adult and senior with the necessary mental health services and supports set forth in their treatment plan. Finally, the Act requires this Three Year Plan be developed with the active participation of local stakeholders in a community program planning process. Plan Changes for FY 2017-20. Significant changes to the FY 2014-17 Three Year Plan that are incorporated into the FY 2017-20 Three Year Plan include: • A data driven assessment of community mental health needs in Contra Costa County (pages 10-11). • A description of this year’s Community Program Planning Process (pages 12-28). • Outcome indicators for FY 2016-17 are included in the County’s Full Service Partnerships program description (page 29). • The County is planning to re-purpose their county owned Oak Grove facility in Concord to establish a 24 bed residential treatment facility for youth ages 16-24. (pages 34-35) • A description of the State initiative “No Place Like Home” is introduced (pages 35-36). • The Special Needs Housing Program has been added (page 37). • MHSA funding has been added to support Early and Periodic, Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment (EPSDT) expansion requirements (pages 40-41). • Funding has been added to expand the County’s Mobile Crisis Response capacity in both Children’s and Adult Systems of care.(pages 29 and 43). • New PEI outcome indicators are described (page 47). • PEI programs are aligned with the seven new PEI categories (pages 47-57). June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 700 • The County’s First Hope Program has added staff to now serve transition age youth experiencing a first psychotic break (page 51). • Two emerging Innovative projects are described; Center for Recovery and Empowerment, and Cognitive Behavioral Social Skills Training (pages 58-59). • A Family Support Program is added to the Workforce Education and Training Component (pages 62-63). • Mental Health First Aid Training is linked to community first responders to provide ongoing mental health training, support and consultation (page 64). • A locally administered Loan Forgiveness Program to address workforce shortages is added. (page 66). June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 701 Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 3 Vision ..................................................................................................................................................... 7 Needs Assessment ................................................................................................................................ 9 The Community Program Planning Process ........................................................................................ 11 The Plan .............................................................................................................................................. 28 Community Services and Supports .................................................................................................. 28 Prevention and Early Intervention ..................................................................................................... 47 Innovation ........................................................................................................................................ 58 Workforce Education and Training ................................................................................................... 62 Capital Facilities/Information Technology ......................................................................................... 67 The Budget .......................................................................................................................................... 68 Evaluating the Plan .............................................................................................................................. 72 Acknowledgements .............................................................................................................................. 73 Appendices - Mental Health Service Maps………………………………………………………………….....A-1 - Program and Plan Element Profiles…………………………………………………………….B-1 - Glossary………………………………………………………………………………………...…C-1 - Certifications………………………………………………………………………………………D-1 - Funding Summaries…………………………………………..………………………………….E-1 - Public Comment and Hearing…………………………………………………………………...F-1 - Board Resolution…………………………………………………………………………………G-1 Note. The Program and Plan Element Profiles and the Glossary sections are included in the Appendices to provide more information regarding a specific program or plan element, and to assist in better understanding terms that are used. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 702 (Page left intentionally blank) June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 703 Vision The Mental Health Services Act serves as a catalyst for the creation of a framework that calls upon members of our community to work together to facilitate change and establish a culture of cooperation, participation and innovation. We recognize the need to improve services for individuals and families by addressing their complex behavioral health needs. This is an ongoing expectation. We need to continually challenge ourselves by working to improve a system that pays particular attention to individuals and families who need us the most, and may have the most difficult time accessing care. Our consumers, their families and our service providers describe mental health care that works best by highlighting the following themes: Access. Programs and care providers are most effective when they serve those with mental health needs without regard to Medi-Cal eligibility or immigration status. They provide a warm, inviting environment, and actively and successfully address the issues of transportation to and from services, wait times, availability after hours, services that are culturally and linguistically competent, and services that are performed where individuals live. Capacity. Care providers are most appreciated when they are able to take the time to determine with the individual and his or her family the level and type of care that is needed and appropriate, coordinate necessary health, mental health and ancillary resources, and then are able to take the time to successfully partner with the individual and his or her family to work through the mental health issues. Integration. Mental health care works best when health and behavioral health providers, allied service professionals, public systems such as law enforcement, education and social services, and private community and faith-based organizations work as a team. Effective services are the result of multiple services coordinated to a successful resolution. We honor this input by envisioning a system of care that supports independence, hope, and healthy lives by making accessible behavioral health services that are responsive, integrated, compassionate and respectful. Cynthia Belon, L.C.S.W. Behavioral Health Services Director June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 704 (Page left intentionally blank) June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 705 Needs Assessment Introduction Contra Costa Behavioral Health Services (“CCBHS”) conducted a quantitative assessment of public mental health need in preparation for developing the Fiscal Year 2017-20 Mental Health Services Act (“MHSA”) Three Year Program and Expenditure Plan (“Three Year Plan”). This data driven analysis complements the Community Program Planning Process (“CPPP”), where interested stakeholders provided input on priority needs and suggested strategies to meet these needs. Data was obtained to determine whether CCBHS was: a) reaching the people it is mandated to serve, b) appropriately allocating its resources to provide a full spectrum of care, and c) experiencing any significant workforce shortfalls. Benchmarks for the CCBHS target population were established for the county and county regions (East, Central, West) as well as by race/ethnicity, age group and identified gender to determine whether CCBHS was serving more or less than these benchmarks. Benchmarks for appropriate resourcing by level of mental health care, ranging from locked facilities to basic services for prevention and health maintenance, were also established to determine whether the level of funding CCBHS spent on each level met recommended standards. Finally, all CCBHS position classifications were reviewed to determine whether any significant shortfalls existed between authorized versus filled positions, staffing demographics, and bilingual staff. Results Data analysis supports that CCBHS is serving the number of clients that approximate the estimated number of individuals requiring services, and moreover serves more eligible clients than the majority of counties in California. This is based upon prevalence estimates and penetration rates of low income children with serious emotional disturbance and adults with a serious mental illness as compared with other counties. In addition, each Contra Costa County region (West, Central, East) and demographic sub-population within the County are equitably and appropriately represented, with the exception of Asian/Pacific Islanders, Latina/os, children ages 0-5 years, and adults ages 60 and over as being slightly underrepresented in each region when compared to other sub-populations within Contra Costa County. Fiscal Year 2015-16 expenditure data indicate services were available at every level of care as defined by the Level of Care Utilization System (LOCUS/CALOCUS). However, compared to benchmarks, CCBHS overspends on the most acute level of in-patient care (Level 6), and is below the benchmark in expenditures related to programs providing high intensity community- based services (Levels 4 and 5). June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 706 Workforce analysis indicates a significant shortage of psychiatry time, both in county positions as well as contract psychiatrists. Compounding the issue of filling vacant psychiatrist positions is that Contra Costa County reimburses psychiatrists at a lower rate than neighboring counties. Latina/o and Asian/Pacific Islander populations are under-represented among county staff when compared to the county population. Finally, CCBHS has incrementally increased the number of bilingual staff each year, and has made available as needed phone, in-person and video interpretation services. Recommendations This quantitative needs assessment suggests attention in the following areas: • Strengthen outreach and engagement strategies for identified underserved populations across the county. o Relevant Programs/Plan Elements. PEI programs will be fully compliant with new regulations that require documenting access and linkage to mental health treatment, with outreach and engagement to those populations who have been identified as underserved (page 46). The Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment (EPSDT) program in the Children’s System of Care will receive additional MHSA funding for staff to serve children, to include ages 0-5, who are experiencing serious emotional disturbances (page 41). The Innovative Project, Partners in Aging, will be fully implemented during this Three Year Plan, whereby clinicians and community support workers will enhance the County’s Older Adult IMPACT Program (page 59). • Improve capacity to assist consumers move from locked facilities to community based services. o Relevant Programs/Plan Elements. The locally administered Special Needs Housing Program will be implemented during this Three Year Plan, and will utilize $1.72 million to provide permanent supportive housing in the community to the seriously mentally ill (page 38). • Explore strategies to recruit and retain psychiatrists and staff representing underserved populations. o Relevant Programs/Plan Elements. For the Three year Plan CCBHS will implement a County funded Loan Forgiveness Program that specifically addresses critical psychiatry shortages (page 66). Additional funding has been added to the graduate level Internship Program to strengthen the recruitment of individuals who are bilingual and/or bi-cultural, and who can reduce the disparity of race/ethnicity identification of staff with that of the population served (page 65). The full needs assessment report can be found at http://cchealth.org/mentalhealth/mhsa/pdf/2017-0316-mhsa-assessment.pdf June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 707 The Community Program Planning Process Each year CCBHS utilizes a community program planning process to 1) identify issues related to mental illness that result from a lack of mental health services and supports, 2) analyze mental health needs, and 3) identify priorities and strategies to meet these mental health needs. CPAW. CCBHS continues to seek counsel from its ongoing stakeholder body, entitled the Consolidated Planning Advisory Workgroup (CPAW). Over the years CPAW members, consisting of consumers, family members, service providers and representative community members, have provided input to the Behavioral Health Services Director as each Three Year Plan and Yearly Update has been developed and implemented. CPAW has recommended that the Three Year Plan provide a comprehensive approach that links MHSA funded services and supports to prioritized needs, evaluates their effectiveness and fidelity to the intent of the Act, and informs future use of MHSA funds. CPAW has also recommended that each year’s Community Program Planning Process build upon and further what was learned in previous years. Thus the Three Year Plan can provide direction for continually improving not only MHSA funded services, but also influencing the County’s entire Behavioral Health Services Division. Community Forums. CPAW has been the central planning and implementation resource for fielding each year’s Community Program Planning Process. Last year’s venue was to engage consumers and family members who participate in MHSA funded Prevention and Early Intervention programs that provide outreach and engagement to underserved populations in their respective communities. This year’s venue was to bring together via three community forums consumers, family members, service providers and interested community members by Contra Costa County region (West, Central, and East). Over 300 individuals attended these three forums (October 6 in San Pablo, November 3 in Pleasant Hill, December 1 in Bay Point), and self-identified as one or more of the following: • 23% - a consumer of mental health services • 32% - a family member of a consumer of services • 39% - a provider of mental health services • 14% - an interested member of the community Small Group Discussions. Participants actively discussed in small groups ten topical issues that were developed by consumer, family member and service provider representatives before the forums. Highlights of the discussions include: June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 708 • What should services in my culture look like? o Diversity is important, and cultural differences should be understood and respected in a non-judgmental way. We need to be culturally humble. A diverse mental health workforce sends a message to non-dominant cultures that differences are honored. o We are getting more immigrants who need more support in understanding our laws. o Many of our immigrants come from war torn countries and suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder. Care providers need to understand how specific cultures deal with this disorder, as a common tendency is to hide mental illness. o Suggest using non-traditional means to gain trust and acceptance, such as music, art, multi-media, and gardening. o Suggest developing a cadre of paid and volunteer care providers of the same culture to go to people’s homes, as people need to develop trust, and are often fearful of being subjected to legal action. o Youth, especially those with a non-heterosexual gender identity, are prone to bullying and are vulnerable to suicidal behavior. o For African and Hispanic Americans mental health care should be family centered and/or faith based. o Clinicians should understand the ramifications of assigning a mental illness diagnosis. o We need more clinicians who speak multiple languages – we are losing them to neighboring counties because of pay disparity. o The County should be current with race/ethnicity trends, where Latina/os are moving to the West and African Americans are moving to the Eastern part of the County. o Organizations, such as the Native American Health Center, should be educating mental health providers about the various Native American cultures. o Medication prescribers need to be sensitive to potential ethnic specific reactions. o We need to ensure that translated materials and language interpreters are sensitive to and being understood by the people needing this accommodation. • How can I get housing that I can afford? o The housing market is way too expensive to enable low income people to afford rents. We need rent control. o Section 8 housing is too difficult to navigate to be a resource. o Affordable housing often means unsafe housing. o People need access to the internet and help navigating the application process. o People searching for housing often need some form of stable short-term housing. Sometimes they may need to get help cleaning up and resting at these places so they can be presentable for interviews. o The east end of the County has the fastest growing population of people not being able to afford housing, and has the least resources to help with this problem. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 709 o Suggest a clearinghouse to assist individuals and their families to find affordable housing. Need to do a better job of sharing housing opportunity information. Need a one stop shopping approach, with a single application. o More shelter beds needed, especially in the wintertime when it is full. o Public dollars should go to non-profits with supportive housing expertise, rather than banks and developers. o More shared housing capacity should be developed, such as elders pooling resources, and families with mental health experience taking in individuals into their homes. Cities should permit “mother-in-law” units. o Re-purpose abandoned or foreclosed structures for affordable housing. o Increase the number of board and care homes. o Advocate for the Board of Supervisors to spend more dollars for housing. o Flexible funding needed to pay for credit checks, first/last month’s rent, moving in and out, and other expenses to enable individuals to obtain housing. o Organizations should partner to help people get and keep housing. • What should care look like for persons with serious mental illness who live in supportive housing? o Services should be provided on site, or have a multi-disciplinary mobile team come to the sites. Mental health, substance abuse and primary health issues should be addressed holistically and in a coordinated fashion. o Include life skills support, such as budgeting and money management, cooking, cleaning, home maintenance and conflict resolution skills in order for individuals to keep their residence. o Care providers should partner with property managers to deal with behavior issues that might threaten an individual keeping their residency. o For augmented board and cares specific attention should be given to medication regimens, if professional staff are not located on site. o Family members living off site should be welcomed and included, as appropriate, and emphasis and rules should be supportive of family reunification. o Support groups, such as twelve step, should be encouraged. o Daily meaningful activities, such as self-care regimens, hobby groups, parenting classes, field trips, gardening, site maintenance, pre-vocational activities, before and after school programs and social/cultural activities should be built in, whether at the site or arranged. o Case management should not drop off when a consumer is placed, but should complement on-site services. o Housing problems, such as bad food and bed bugs, can trigger mental health problems. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 710 o Before being discharged from psychiatric hospitals persons should have dedicated attention to preparation for living in a less restricted environment, even if it means prolonging their stay to acquire these skills and coping mechanisms. o It is important not to place supported living residences in high crime and drug environments. o Each supportive living arrangement should build into all of their activities the goal of improving a consumers living situation, to include moving out to better, more independent housing. o All of the above would require many more dollars allocated than is currently being budgeted. • What does help getting to and from services look like? o Services are too spread out in the County to be accessible. Many countywide services are located in central county, where public transportation is not available to the east and west ends of the County. o Using BART/buses can be daunting. Coaching to use public transportation independently would be helpful, to include coping with fears, safety concerns, and responding appropriately to bullying and discrimination. o Becoming eligible for discount passes can be difficult. Assistance in becoming eligible would be helpful, as well as the funding to be able to afford vouchers. o Suggest a shuttle service that stops at common safe stops, and coordinates with people who live in close proximity to each other, and when people have health/mental health appointments. o Assist individuals connect with each other so they can ride together. o Coordinate appointment scheduling around public transportation schedules. o Explore voucher system with Uber/Lyft as a means of ride sharing door to door. Expand their business model to include minors. o Continue moving mental health care out to common safe spots, such as schools, colleges, health centers, so that care is brought closer to where consumers live. o Expand volunteer services so that drivers can transport consumers. o Advocate with transit authorities for more accessible public transportation routes and provide more benches and shelters. o Use smart phones to assist with linking to directions and public transportation availability. • Helping family members navigate mental health, medical, and alcohol and drug services – what should that look like? o These services are housed separately, have different eligibility requirements, have different treatment approaches, are poorly coordinated both within themselves and with the education, social services and criminal justice systems, and often have June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 711 differing, lengthy waiting periods before treatment happens. This is overwhelming for family members. o Care providers should work together to provide a more coordinated, whole person team approach that considers and responds to all co-occurring disorders that affect a person simultaneously, to include mental illness, developmental disabilities, health issues, and drug and alcohol problems. o Funding streams for these resources should be coordinated such that eligibility does not interfere with or prevent appropriate response and treatment by care providers. o Family members of consumers should be included as part of the treatment team, with assistance provided for them to become powerful natural supports in the recovery of their loved ones. o Resources should be allocated to establish paid staff to 1) support family members access and navigate current treatment systems, 2) develop family members with lived experience to act as subject matter experts in a volunteer capacity to educate and support other family members in understanding and best participating in the different systems of care, 3) provide outreach and education to the community to reduce stigma and discrimination pertaining to mental illness, and 4) partner with other organizations to increase community involvement and support in the care of persons with mental illness. o Support and education groups for families specific to different cultures and languages need to be increased throughout the County. o Family supports need to be developed in and by the various communities in the County, and need to be culturally and linguistically accessible to the families served, irrespective of their ability to pay. o Provide a single place of contact in each region of the county for family members to obtain assistance with mobilizing treatment resources for their loved ones. • What should emotional support for family members look like? o The biggest support comes from families who have been through similar experiences and who understand what a family is going through. o Mental illness affects the entire family, so emotional support should be for everyone, including the siblings. o Families often see disturbing behavior and don’t recognize that there is a mental illness going on. Early education and awareness is key to de-stigmatizing, learning coping mechanisms and getting loved ones the help they need. When first encountering mental illness they don’t know what to do. o Learning self-care is empowering. o Most helpful is respite care for parents to have a break. o Help in understanding, accessing and navigating services is a tremendous emotional support. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 712 o It is important for people providing emotional support to families to be culturally humble and honor a family’s personal beliefs. o NAMI has perfected how to support family members and should be funded to expand this support to paid staff. Operating with only volunteers, NAMI has been limited in what they can do; especially providing family support in the east, west and southern portions of the county. o Providing NAMI funding would enable expanding outreach to families of youth and adults in the criminal justice system. o Recommend providing psychotherapy for family members who have a loved one experiencing mental illness. • How should public mental health partner with the community when violence and trauma occur? o Schools can identify children traumatized and at risk, but teachers and staff are not equipped to adequately care for the child and their family. Via wraparound funding behavioral health should partner with education on site and in the homes to provide needed mental health services. o Children under five and kids with special needs are particularly vulnerable, and are often overlooked. o Persons who are homeless are in continuous trauma. o There appears to be a recent increase in violence toward immigrants, Muslims and persons who identify themselves as lesbian, gay, bi-sexual, transgender or who question their sexual identity or gender. There is increased fear among these individuals. o Mental health care should be extended to teachers, police, church staff, and other community organization first responders, as they are dealing with trauma as well. Working closely with the police is especially helpful. o Care should be brought to the community by staff who are trusted and culturally and linguistically responsive. Non-labeling and confidentiality are most important. o Care providers who are not properly trained, ill-suited, or abuse the power of their position can do more damage than the trauma itself. o Relationships and trust should be established with community first responders before violence occurs, through training, workshops and community events. o First responders need better information regarding what mental health resources are present in their community, and how to access and navigate them. o The key role of drugs and alcohol leading to violence need to be recognized and included as part of the mental health care. o Attention should be focused on the perpetrators, in order to break the cycle of violence. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 713 o Some sort of infrastructure needs to be built such that mental health professionals can respond quickly when community trauma occurs. o Service should be provided immaterial of whether the family has insurance. o Mental health professionals should be aware and prepared to address learned desensitization, stigma of discussing feelings regarding experienced violence, and distrust of authority figures. o All behavioral health staff should stay current with the latest in trauma informed response and care. o Ending up in the County’s psychiatric in-patient ward does not help the person, and often signals a failure to prevent hospitalization. • How do we care for young people who have both mental health and alcohol and drug problems? o Currently there is no coordinated outpatient mental health and alcohol/drug treatment services for adolescents, and very limited in-patient treatment. This often leads to juvenile hall. o We should be providing all levels of care in one place, from intensive to continuing care. o First responders, such as mental health probation liaisons, delinquency boards, faith based groups and teachers trained to recognize symptoms can act as referral sources. o Should engage the whole family. Part of the therapy is education regarding addiction as being a “family disease”. Also, there is the reality of relapse when returning a youth to a family that is still using and abusing drugs and alcohol. o Successful graduates of treatment are ideal to act as peer mentors. o Best practices should be determined by the culture the youth is a part of. o Mental health and substance use disorder professionals need to be cross trained in each other’s disciplines, as well as how to work together as team. o Medi-Cal eligibility should not be a barrier, as the need in this age group is overwhelming and cuts across all levels of society. o Mental health providers should be able to bill Medi-Cal for substance use disorder treatment the same as they do for mental health disorders. o There should be a substance use disorder professional co-located at each regional mental health clinic. o School district administrators should be partnered with to establish as part of the district’s educational plan curricula regarding mental health/substance use disorders and the neuropsychiatry of addiction. o Marketing and education efforts should utilize more social media modes than the current method of flyers and other hard copy materials. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 714 • How do we help people who get better move to lower levels of care? o There should be discussion of and planning for use of less acute levels of service right from the beginning, so that consumers are prepared to demonstrate higher levels of self-care as they move to lower levels of professional care. o Systems of care should be as flexible and non-judgmental as possible to reduce resistance (stigma and embarrassment) when higher levels are needed due to external factors. These setbacks, when properly handled, enable greater learning and better use of lower levels of care when the person is ready. o All of our various programs need to do a better job of coordinating care and “warm hand offs” with each other. o Mentoring plays an important role in people’s success. A single mentor with lived experience reinforces the goal of self-sufficiency and supports movement to different levels helps. o As many levels of care in one place helps. Permanent supportive housing, with many levels of care on site, is a good model. o Make sure that there is a lower level of care to go to and utilize. For example, returning to a gang as the only means for social connectivity is not helpful. o Emphasizing spirituality as part of the healing process at all levels facilitates a deeper and unified approach to wellness, and assists in seeing a level of care as a milestone, and not an end in itself. o Incorporating meaningful activity at all levels focuses on strengths, and can be built upon as one navigates care. o Varying levels of employment, from volunteering, to subsidized employment, to competitive jobs in the community can support recovery. o Recommend utilizing today’s tools of apps and social media to facilitate incorporation of self-care into daily health and mental health habits. o Teaching life and social skills at all levels also is key to the recovery process. o Inclusion and involvement of the family and other natural supports are important. o The current model of state and federal reimbursements need to be addressed in order to incentivize counties to facilitate appropriate movement of consumers to lower cost treatment based upon their recovery progress, and not on the need of the system to save money. Current Medi-Cal billing makes this difficult. • What community mental health needs and strategies would you like to discuss that have not been mentioned? o Pre-employment services need to be expanded so that people have the whole range of activities that can prepare them for employment, to include volunteer experiences and internships. These services are particularly lacking for transitional age youth. Suggest partnering with the Career Resource Centers throughout the county. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 715 o Aging felons are coming out of prison after experiencing many years of trauma and do not have any place to go or any support system. o Young people experiencing a first psychotic break can receive effective treatment that enables recovery. This county needs funding to establish a first break program. o NAMI should receive financial support to support and educate families of persons with mental health issues. o The hearing impaired need mental health services. o Many immigrants and undocumented persons are now fearful and distrustful of the system. We need to provide safe spaces for them to get the care they need. o We need a substance use detoxification program in each region of the county that includes mental health treatment. o We cannot get any psychiatry time in our part of the county. o Would like one stop centers that are inclusive and inviting, such as senior centers and the Family Justice Center. o People need to have services and supports in their native language. o Children with special needs, such as learning and developmental disabilities have a hard time getting mental health services. o Money management, or benefits counseling is no longer offered and is sorely needed for consumers so that they can access and navigate financial benefits, manage their money, and not get taken advantage of. o Faith based spiritual work should be included as part of the recovery process. o Foster youth mental health services are lacking. o Youth need safe places to go where they see other youth that look like them and mental health discussions are normalized to reduce stigma and discrimination. o Expand the SPIRIT program to support internships outside of behavioral health settings. Consider internships before as well as after the classroom training. o More adequate psychiatric emergency facilities are needed. o Children out of county placements are a hardship for the family. o Parents of adult children with serious mental illness could use respite care. Prioritizing Identified Needs. As part of the event participants were then asked to prioritize via applying dot markers the following identified needs from previous years’ community program planning processes. This provides a means for evaluating perceived impact over time of implemented strategies to meet prioritized needs. Needs are listed in order of priority as determined by forum participants, with previous Three Year Plan rankings provided for comparison. 1. More housing and homeless services. (Previous rank: 1) The chronic lack of affordable housing make this a critical factor that affects the mental health and well- being of all individuals with limited means. However, it is especially deleterious for an individual and his/her family who are also struggling with a serious mental illness. A June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 716 range of strategies that would increase housing availability include increasing transitional beds, housing vouchers, supportive housing services, permanent housing units with mental health supports, staff assistance to locate and secure housing in the community, and coordination of effort between Health, Housing and Homeless Services and CCBHS. o Relevant program/plan elements: Sufficient affordable housing for all consumers of CCBHS is beyond the financial means of the County’s Behavioral Health Services budget. It is estimated that up to 3,800 individuals in the County are homeless on any given night. The MHSA funded Housing Services category of the Community Services and Supports component is coordinating staff and resources with the Health, Housing and Homeless Services Division in order to improve and maximize the impact of the number of beds and housing units available, shorten wait times, and improve mental health treatment and life skills supports needed for consumers to acquire and retain housing (pages 35-38). In anticipation of the statewide initiative “No Place Like Home” the Board of Supervisors authorized $1.72 million be returned to the County for local administration of funds to support permanent supportive housing (page 36). In addition, an Innovative project entitled “Cognitive Behavioral Social Services Training” is planned to bring mental health care to individuals with serious mental illness in the County’s augmented board and care facilities (page 59). 2. More support for family members and loved ones of consumers. (Previous rank: 11) Critical to successful treatment is the need for service providers to partner with family members and significant others of loved ones experiencing mental illness. Stakeholders continued to underscore the need to provide families and significant others with education and training, emotional support, and assistance with navigating the system. o Relevant program/plan elements: Children’s Services utilizes family partners to actively engage families in the therapeutic process, and fields the evidence based practices of multi-dimensional family therapy and multi-systemic therapy, where families are an integral part of the treatment response (page 29-30, 40). Adult Services is expanding their family advocacy services to all three of their Adult Mental Health Clinics (page 33, 40-41). In the Prevention and Early Intervention component the County provides clinicians dedicated to supporting families experiencing the juvenile justice system due to their adolescent children’s involvement with the law (page 51). Two programs provide family education designed to support healthy parenting skills (page 47). Project First Hope provides multi-family group therapy and psycho- education to intervene early in a young person’s developing psychosis (page 50). Rainbow Community Center has a family support component (page 52). June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 717 The Workforce Education and Training Component funds NAMI’s Family-to Family training, where emotional support and assistance with how to navigate the system is provided (page 63). For this Three Year Plan a community based organization will be funded to recruit, train and develop family support volunteers to assist, educate and help families members navigate services and enhance their capacity to participate in their loved ones’ recovery (page 61-62). 3. Better coordination of care between providers of mental health, substance use disorders, homeless services and primary care. (Previous rank: 3) Integrating mental health, primary care, drug and alcohol, homeless services and employment services through a coordinated, multi-disciplinary team approach has been proven effective for those consumers fortunate to have this available. Often cited by consumers and their families was the experience of being left on their own to find and coordinate services, and to understand and navigate the myriad of eligibility and paperwork issues that characterize different service systems. Also cited was the difficulty of coordinating education, social services and the criminal justice systems to act in concert with the behavioral health system. o Relevant Program/Plan Elements. The Three Year Plan funds a number of multi- disciplinary teams that models effective integration of service providers for select groups of clients. However, this is a system issue that affects all programs and plan elements. The chapter entitled Evaluating the Plan describes the method by which every program and plan element will be evaluated as to the degree to which it communicates effectively with its community partners. The degree to which there is successful communication, cooperation and collaboration will be addressed in each written report, with program response and plan(s) of action required where attention is needed (page 71). 4. Children and youth in-patient and residential beds. (Previous rank: 6) In-patient beds and residential services for children needing intensive psychiatric care are not available in the county, and are difficult to find outside the county. This creates a significant hardship on families who can and should be part of the treatment plan, and inappropriately strains care providers of more temporary (such as psychiatric emergency services) or less acute levels of treatment (such as Children’s’ clinics) to respond to needs they are ill equipped to address. Additional funding outside the Mental Health Services Fund would be needed to add this resource to the County, as in-patient psychiatric hospitalization is outside the scope of MHSA. o Relevant Program/Plan Elements. In response to recent state legislation CCBHS will be offering the continuum of early and periodic screening, diagnosis and treatment (EPSDT) services to any specialty mental health service child and June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 718 young adult who needs it. The Needs Assessment has indicated that seriously emotionally disturbed children ages 0-5 are slightly underrepresented in receiving care. This additional funding will add capacity for the Children’s System of Care to serve more children ages 0-5. In addition, newly enacted Assembly Bill 403 mandates statewide reform for care provided to foster care children, to include the County’s responsibility to provide Therapeutic Foster Care (TFC) services. This expansion of care responsibility will enable the County to reduce the need for care in more restricted, locked facilities (page 40-41). 5. Finding the right services when you need it. (Previous rank: 8) Mental health and its allied providers, such as primary care, alcohol and other drug services, housing and homeless services, vocational services, educational settings, social services and the criminal justice system provide a complexity of eligibility and paperwork requirements that can be defeating. Just knowing what and where services are can be a challenge. Easy access to friendly, knowledgeable individuals who can ensure connection to appropriate services is critical. o Relevant program/plan elements: Family partners are stationed at the children’s and adult county operated clinics to assist family members and their loved ones navigate services. Clinicians are stationed at adult operated clinics to assist consumers with rapid access and connectivity to services (page 33). The Workforce Education and Training Component funds NAMI’s Family-to Family training, where emotional support and assistance with how to navigate the system is provided (page 62). For this Three Year Plan a community based organization will be funded to recruit, train and develop family support volunteers to assist, educate and help families members navigate services and enhance their capacity to participate in their loved ones’ recovery (page 61-62). 6. Improved response to crisis and trauma. (Previous rank: 4) Response to crisis situations occurring in the community needs to be improved for both adults and children. Crisis response now primarily consists of psychiatric emergency services located at the Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (CCRMC). There are few more appropriate and less costly alternatives. Relevant program/plan elements: CCBHS should be part of a quality mental health response to traumatic violence experienced by the community. CCBHS is training and certifying a number of our mental health professionals to offer Mental Health First Aid training to community groups who have a special interest in responding to trauma events. A component of the training will be strengthening the ability to identify the need for more intensive mental health care, as well as the ability to connect individuals to the right resources (page 63). Hope House, a crisis June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 719 residential facility, and the Miller Wellness Center are now fully operational (pages 34-5, 41). CCBHS has been awarded state MHSA funding for a mobile, multi- disciplinary team for adults and older adults to partner with law enforcement to field a Mental Health Evaluation Team (MHET). Referrals are persons who have been in contact with the police on numerous occasions due to psychiatric issues, and are at a high risk for hospitalization or incarceration. MHSA funds will be used to augment and expand the capacity of CCBHS clinicians to assist law enforcement jurisdictions respond to persons experiencing psychiatric crises (page 43). Seneca Family of Agencies contracts with the County as part of the Children’s Services full service partnership program, and provides a mobile response team for coordinating crisis support activities on behalf of youth and their families. Additional MHSA funding will support expanding the hours of availability of Seneca’s mobile crisis response team’s capacity to respond to children and their families when in crisis. For this Three Year Plan MHSA funds will be used to augment and expand the capacity of the Forensic Team in order to field a countywide mobile crisis response intervention for adult consumers experiencing mental health crises (page 29). 7. Support for peer and family partner providers. (Previous rank: 7) CCBHS was acknowledged for hiring individuals who bring lived experience as consumers and/or family members of consumers. Their contributions have clearly assisted the County to move toward a more client and family member directed, recovery focused system of care. However, these individuals have noted the high incidence of turnover among their colleagues due to exacerbation of mental health issues brought on by work stressors, and lack of support for career progression. Individuals in recovery who are employed need ongoing supports that assist with career progression, and normalizes respites due to relapses. o Relevant program/plan elements: CCBHS has strengthened its certification training for consumers who are preparing for a service provider role in the behavioral health system. Additional staff are funded to expand the SPIRIT curriculum to include preparing family members as well, provide ongoing career development and placement assistance, and develop ongoing supports for individuals with lived experience who are now working in the system (pages 63- 64). 8. Intervening early in psychosis. (Previous rank: 5) Teenagers and young adults experiencing a first psychotic episode are at risk for becoming lifelong consumers of the public mental health system. Evidence based practices are now available that can successfully address this population by applying an intensive multi-disciplinary, family based approach. A proposed strategy is to expand the target population now served by June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 720 Project First Hope from youth at risk for experiencing a psychotic episode to include those who have experienced a “first break”. o Relevant program/plan elements: The Three Year Plan now includes funding to expand Project First Hope to serve teenagers and young adults experiencing a first psychotic episode (page 50). 9. Getting care in my community, in my culture, in my language. (Previous rank: 9) Focus groups underscored that mental health stigma and non-dominant culture differences continue to provide barriers to seeking and sustaining mental health care. Emphasis should continue on recruiting and retaining cultural and linguistically competent service providers, training and technical assistance emphasis on treating the whole person, and the importance of providing on-going staff training on cultural specific treatment modalities. Also, culture-specific service providers providing outreach and engagement should assist their consumers navigate all levels of service that is provided in the behavioral health system. Transition age youth, to include lesbian, gay, bi-sexual, transgender and questioning youth, who live in at-risk environments feel particularly vulnerable to physical harassment and bullying. Stakeholders continued to emphasize MHSA’s role in funding access to all levels of service for those individuals who are poor and not Medi-Cal eligible. o Relevant program/plan elements: Prevention and Early Intervention programs provide outreach and engagement to individuals and underserved populations who are at-risk for suffering the debilitating effects of serious mental illness. These programs are culture specific, and will be evaluated by how well they assist individuals from non-dominant cultures obtain the cultural and linguistically appropriate mental health care needed (pages 46-56). The training and technical assistance category of the Workforce Education and Training component utilizes MHSA funding to sensitize service providers to the issues impacting cultural awareness and understanding, and mental health access and service delivery for underserved cultural and ethnic populations (pages 62-63). The Needs Assessment has indicated the underrepresentation of care provider staff who identify as Hispanic and Asian Pacific Islanders. Additional funds have been added to the Internship program to specifically recruit clinicians to address this underrepresentation (page 64). 10. Assistance with meaningful activity. (Previous rank: 2) Stakeholders underscored the value of engaging in meaningful activity as an essential element of a treatment plan. Youth in high risk environments who are transitioning to adulthood were consistently noted as a high priority. For pre-vocational activities, suggested strategies include providing career guidance, assistance with eliminating barriers to employment, and assistance with educational, training and volunteer activities that improve job readiness. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 721 Stakeholders highlighted the need for better linkage to existing employment services, such as job seeking, placement and job retention assistance. For daily living skills, suggested strategies include assistance with money and benefits management, and improving health, nutrition, transportation, cooking, cleaning and home maintenance skill sets. o Relevant program/plan elements: Putnam Clubhouse provides peer-based programming that helps individuals develop support networks, career development skills, and the self-confidence needed to sustain stable, productive and more independent lives (page 49). An Innovation project from Vocational Services staff of CCBHS has implemented a new and different pattern of service that expands Contra Costa Vocational Services capacity to provide more pre- vocational services to enable greater access to existing employment services (page 57). The Prevention and Early Intervention programs of Contra Costa Interfaith Housing (page 47), New Leaf Collaborative (page 49), People Who Care (page 49) and RYSE (page 49) all have services to assist young people navigate school successfully and engage in meaningful activity. 11. Getting to and from services. (Previous rank: 10) The cost of transportation and the County’s geographical challenges make access to services a continuing priority. Flexible financial assistance with both public and private transportation, training on how to use public transportation, driving individuals to and from appointments, and bringing services to where individuals are located, are all strategies needing strengthening and coordinating. o Relevant program/plan elements: Transportation assets and flexible funds to assist consumers get to and from services are included in supports provided in Full Service Partnerships (pages 28-34). MHSA purchased vehicles to augment children, adult and older adult county operated clinic transportation assets, and additional staff are being hired through MHSA funding to drive consumers to and from appointments (page 42). The Innovative Project, Overcoming Transportation Barriers, has been implemented to provide a comprehensive, multi-faceted approach to transportation needs (pages 58-59). 12. Care for homebound frail and elderly. (Previous rank: 14) Services for older adults continue to struggle with providing effective treatment for those individuals who are homebound and suffer from multiple physical and mental impairments. Often these individuals cycle through psychiatric emergency care without resolution. o Relevant program/plan elements: MHSA funds the Older Adult Program, where three multi-disciplinary teams, one for each region of the County provide mental health services to older adults in their homes, in the community, and within a clinical setting (pages 39-40). Lifelong Medical Care is funded in the Prevention June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 722 and Early Intervention component to provide services designed to support isolated older adults (pages 52-53). The Innovative Project, Partners in Aging, trains and fields in-home peer support workers to engage older adults who are frail, homebound and suffer from mental health issues. This innovative project is being implemented in response to the Needs Assessment, where older adults have been identified as underrepresented in the client population (pages 58-59). 13. Serve those who need it the most. (Previous rank: 12) Through MHSA funding the County has developed designated programs for individuals with serious mental illness who have been deemed to be in need of a full spectrum of services. These are described in the full service partnership category of the Community Services and Supports component. In spite of these programs, stakeholders report that a number of individuals who have been most debilitated by the effects of mental illness continue to cycle through the most costly levels of care without success. o Relevant program/plan elements: In February 2015, the Contra Costa Board of Supervisors passed a resolution authorizing $2.25 million of MHSA funds to be utilized on an annual basis for providing mental health treatment as part of an assisted outpatient treatment (AOT) program. The County implements the standards of an assertive community treatment team as prescribed by Assembly Bill 1421, and thus meet the acuity level of a full service partnership. This program provides an experienced, multi-disciplinary team who provides around the clock mobile, out-of-office interventions to adults, a low participant to staff ratio, and provides the full spectrum of services, to include health, substance abuse, vocational and housing services. Persons deemed eligible for assisted outpatient treatment are served, whether they volunteer for services, or are ordered by the court to participate (pages 33-34). 14. Help with moving to a lower level of care as people get better. (Previous rank: 13) Levels of care range from in-patient hospitalization to intensive case management to therapy and medication to self-care recovery services. Stakeholders (both care providers and receivers) consistently cited the difficulty in moving from one level of care to another. Consumers often cited the disincentive to getting better, as it meant loss of care altogether. Consumers and their families indicated that this system inattention to level of care movement often interfered with the important work of minimizing or eliminating the level of psychotropic medications needed to maintain recovery and wellness. Often a “meds only” service response was not responsive to appropriate lower levels of medication and/or psychosocial support alternatives. Care providers indicated that they faced the choice of either ending service or justifying continuance of a more intensive level of care than was needed. Continuity of care from a more intensive to a less intensive level and vice-versa need to be improved. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 723 o Relevant Plan Element. This is a system-wide emphasis that affects all programs and plan elements. The chapter entitled Evaluating the Plan describes the method by which every program and plan element will be evaluated as to the degree to which it meets the needs of the community and/or population. The degree to which there is successful integration between levels of care will be addressed in each written report, with program response and plan(s) of action required where attention is needed (page 71). 15. Better communication, program and fiscal accountability to enable stakeholder participation. (Previous rank: 15) The stakeholder community has requested CCBHS to provide more transparent and ongoing program and fiscal information and decision- making in order to better understand what is working well, what needs to improve, and what needs to change in order to address identified priority needs. This would enable a better working partnership in planning, implementation and evaluation between consumers, their families, service providers, and administration. o Relevant Plan Element. The chapter entitled Evaluating the Plan outlines a comprehensive program and fiscal review of every MHSA funded program that will be conducted in the next three years. These reviews and written reports will provide a transparent means for better aligning resources with needs on an ongoing basis. A monthly program and budget report has been developed and now provides an ongoing means of program and fiscal communication between administration and stakeholders (page 71). Summary. The community program planning process identifies current and ongoing mental health service needs, and provides direction for MHSA funded programs to address these needs. It also informs planning and evaluation efforts that can influence how and where MHSA resources can be directed in the future. The full complement of MHSA funded programs and plan elements described in this document are the result of current as well as previous community program planning processes. Thus, this year’s planning process builds upon previous ones. It is important to note that stakeholders did not restrict their input to only MHSA funded services, but addressed the entire health and behavioral health system. The MHSA Three Year Program and Expenditure Plan operates within the laws and regulations provided for the use of the Mental Health Services Act Fund. Thus, the Three Year Plan contained herein does not address all of the prioritized needs identified in the community program planning process, but does provide a framework for improving existing services and implementing additional programs as funding permits. The following chapters contain programs and plan elements that are funded by the County’s MHSA Fund, and will be evaluated by how well they address the Three Year Plan’s Vision and identified needs as prioritized by the Community Program Planning Process. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 724 The Plan Community Services and Supports Community Services and Supports is the component of the Three-Year Program and Expenditure Plan that refers to service delivery systems for mental health services and supports for children and youth, transition age youth (ages 16-25), adults, and older adults (over 60). Contra Costa County Behavioral Health Services utilizes MHSA funding for the categories of Full Service Partnerships and General System Development. First approved in 2006 with an initial State appropriation of $7.1 million, Contra Costa’s budget has grown incrementally to $37.6 million annually in commitments to programs and services under this component. The construction and direction of how and where to provide funding began with an extensive and comprehensive community program planning process whereby stakeholders were provided training in the intent and requirements of the Mental Health Services Act, actively participated in various venues to identify and prioritize community mental health needs, and developed strategies by which service delivery could grow with increasing MHSA revenues. The programs and services described below are directly derived from this initial planning process, and expanded by subsequent yearly community program planning processes, to include the plan for Fiscal Years 2017-20. Full Service Partnerships Contra Costa Behavioral Health Services both operates and contracts with mental health service providers to enter into collaborative relationships with clients, called full service partnerships. Personal service coordinators develop an individualized services and support plan with each client, and, when appropriate, the client’s family to provide a full spectrum of services in the community necessary to achieve agreed upon goals. Children (0 to 18 years) diagnosed with a serious emotional disturbance, transition age youth (16 to 25 years) diagnosed with a serious emotional disturbance or serious mental illness, and adults and older adults diagnosed with a serious mental illness are eligible. These services and supports include, but are not limited to, crisis intervention/stabilization services, mental health treatment, including alternative and culturally specific treatments, peer support, family education services, access to wellness and recovery centers, and assistance in accessing needed medical, substance abuse, housing, educational, social, vocational rehabilitation and other community services, as appropriate. A qualified service provider is available to respond to the client/family 24 hours a day, seven days a week to provide after-hours intervention. In order to provide the full spectrum of needed services, the County makes available a variety of services that may be provided outside the particular agency who enters into a full service June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 725 partnership agreement with a client. These additional services are included here as part of providing the full spectrum of services in the Full Service Partnership category. As per statute requirements these services comprise the majority of the Community Services and Supports budget. Outcome Indicators. The rates of in-patient psychiatric hospitalization and psychiatric emergency service (PES) episodes for persons participating in Full Service Partnerships indicate whether Contra Costa’s FSP programs promote less utilization of higher acute and more costly care. For FY 2016-17 610 individuals were served in FSPs. Data was able to be obtained for 547 participants, and use of PES and in-patient psychiatric hospitalization was compared before and after FSP participation, with the following results: • A 41.9% decrease in the number of PES episodes • A 62.2% decrease in the number of in-patient psychiatric hospitalizations • A 45.2% decrease in the number of in-patient psychiatric hospitalization days The following full service partnership programs are now established: Children. The Children’s Full Service Partnership Program is comprised of four elements, 1) personal services coordinators, 2) multi-dimensional family therapy for co- occurring disorders, 3) multi-systemic therapy for juvenile offenders, and 4) county operated children’s clinic staff. 1) Personal Service Coordinators. Personal service coordinators are part of a program entitled Short Term Assessment of Resources and Treatment (START). Seneca Family of Agencies contracts with the County to provide personal services coordinators, a mobile crisis response team, and three to six months of short term intensive services to stabilize the youth in their community and to connect them and their families with sustainable resources and supports. Referrals to this program are coordinated by County staff on a countywide assessment team, and services are for youth and their families who are experiencing severe stressors, such as out-of-home placement, involvement with the juvenile justice system, co-occurring disorders, or repeated presentations at the County’s Psychiatric Emergency Services. Mobile Crisis Response - Additional MHSA funding will support expanding the hours of availability of Seneca’s mobile crisis response team’s capacity to respond to children and their families when in crisis. 2) Multi-dimensional Family Therapy (MDFT) for Co-occurring Disorders. Lincoln Child Center contracts with the County to provide a comprehensive and multi-dimensional family-based outpatient program for adolescents with a mental health diagnosis who are experiencing a co-occurring substance abuse issue. These youth are at high risk for continued substance abuse and other problem behaviors, such as conduct disorder and delinquency. This is an evidence based practice of weekly or twice June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 726 weekly sessions conducted over a period of 4-6 months that target the youth’s interpersonal functioning, the parents’ parenting practices, parent-adolescent interactions, and family communications with key social systems. 3) Multi-systemic Therapy (MST) for Juvenile Offenders. Community Options for Families and Youth (COFY) contracts with the County to provide home-based multiple therapist-family sessions over a 3-5 month period. These sessions are based on nationally recognized evidence based practices designed to decrease rates of anti-social behavior, improve school performance and interpersonal skills, and reduce out-of-home placements. The ultimate goal is to empower families to build a healthier environment through the mobilization of existing child, family and community resources. 4) Children’s Clinic Staff. County clinical specialists and family partners serve all regions of the County, and contribute a team effort to full service partnerships. Clinical specialists provide a comprehensive assessment on all youth deemed to be most seriously emotionally disturbed. The team presents treatment recommendations to the family, ensures the family receives the appropriate level of care, and family partners helps families facilitate movement through the system. The Children’s Full Service Partnership Program is summarized below. Note that the total amount of these programs is funded by a combination of Medi-Cal reimbursed specialty mental health services and MHSA funds. Amounts listed are the MHSA funded portion of the total cost: Program/Plan Element County/Contract Region Served Number to be Served Yearly MHSA Funds Allocated for FY 2017-18 Personal Service Coordinators Seneca Family Agencies Countywide 75 808,215 Multi- dimensional Family Therapy Lincoln Center Countywide 60 556,973 Multi-systemic Therapy Community Options for Family and Youth Countywide 66 689,585 Children’s Clinic Staff County Operated Countywide Support for full service partners 743,502 Total 201 $2,798,275 Transition Age Youth. Eligible youth (ages 16-25) are individuals who are diagnosed with a serious emotional disturbance or serious mental illness, and experience one or more of the risk factors of homelessness, co-occurring substance abuse, exposure to June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 727 trauma, repeated school failure, multiple foster care placements, and experience with the juvenile justice system. Fred Finch Youth Center is located in West County and contracts with the CCBHS to serve West and Central County. This program utilizes the assertive community treatment model as modified for young adults that includes a personal service coordinator working in concert with a multi-disciplinary team of staff, including peer and family mentors, a psychiatric nurse practitioner, staff with various clinical specialties, to include co-occurring substance disorder and bilingual capacity. In addition to mobile mental health and psychiatric services the program offers a variety of services designed to promote wellness and recovery, including assistance finding housing, benefits advocacy, school and employment assistance, and support connecting with families. Youth Homes is located in East County contracts with CCBHS to serve Central and East County. This program emphasizes the evidence based practice of integrated treatment for co- occurring disorders, where youth receive mental health and substance abuse treatment from a single treatment specialist, and multiple formats for services are available, to include individual, group, self-help and family. The Transition Age Youth Full Service Partnership Program is summarized below: Program County/Contract Region Served Number to be Served Yearly MHSA Funds Allocated for FY 17-18 Transition Age Youth Full Service Partnership Fred Finch Youth Center West and Central County 70 1,442,661 Transition Age Youth Full Service Partnership Youth Homes Central and East County 30 684,950 County support costs 30,000 Total 100 $2,157,611 Adult. Adult Full Service Partnerships provide a full range of services to adults over the age of 18 who are diagnosed with a serious mental illness, are at or below 200% of the federal poverty level, and are uninsured or receive Medi-Cal benefits. Three contractors to the County will provide full service partnerships in Fiscal Year 2016-17, and utilize a modified assertive community treatment model. This is a model of treatment made up of a multi- disciplinary mental health team, including a peer specialist, who work together to provide the majority of treatment, rehabilitation, and support services that clients use to achieve their goals. CCBHS contracts with Portia Bell Hume Behavioral Health and Training Center (Hume Center) to provide FSP services in the West and East regions of the County. Anka Behavioral Health June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 728 takes the lead in providing full service partnership services to Central County, while Familias Unidas contracts with the County to provide the lead on full service partnerships for West County’s Hispanic population. Anka Behavioral Health additionally serves those adults who have been charged with non- violent felonies or misdemeanors, who experience a serious mental illness/serious emotional disturbance, and are on probation. Contra Costa Behavioral Health’s Forensic Team refers those individuals who have been screened for services and need the full spectrum of care of a full service partnership program. The Adult Full Service Partnership Program is summarized below: Program/Plan Element County/Contract Region Served Number to be Served Yearly MHSA Funds Allocated for FY 17-18 Full Service Partnership Hume Center West County East County 60 50 1,891,395 Full Service Partnership • Includes Forensic clients Anka Behavioral Health Central County Countywide 50 791,751 Full Service Partnership Familias Unidas West County 30 213,309 Total 190 $2,896,455 Additional Services Supporting Full Service Partners. The following services are utilized by full service partners, and enable the County to provide the required full spectrum of services and supports. Adult Mental Health Clinic Support. CCBHS has dedicated clinicians at each of the three adult mental health clinics to provide support, coordination and rapid access for full service partners to health and mental health clinic services as needed and appropriate. Rapid Access Clinicians offer drop-in screening and intake appointments to clients who have been discharged from the County Hospital or Psychiatric Emergency Services but who are not open to the county mental health system of care. Rapid Access Clinicians will then refer clients to appropriate services and, when possible, follow-up with clients to ensure a linkage to services was made. If a client meets eligibility criteria for Full Service Partnership services, the Rapid Access Clinician will seek approval to refer the client to Full Service Partnership services. Clinic management act as the gatekeepers for the Full Service Partnership programs, June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 729 authorizing referrals and discharges as well as providing clinical oversight to the regional Full Service Partnership programs. Full Service Partnership Liaisons provide support to the Full Service Partnership programs by assisting the programs with referrals and discharges, offering clinical expertise, and helping the programs to navigate the County systems of care. Community Support Worker positions are stationed at all three adult clinics to support families of clients as they navigate and assist in the recovery of their loved ones. Program/Plan Element County/Contract Region Served Number to be Served Yearly MHSA Annual Funds Allocated FSP Support, Rapid Access County Operated West, Central, East County Support for Full Service Partners 1,772,145 Total $1,772,145 Assisted Outpatient Treatment. In February 2015, the Contra Costa Board of Supervisors passed a resolution authorizing $2.25 million of MHSA funds to be utilized on an annual basis for providing mental health treatment as part of an assisted outpatient treatment (AOT) program. The County implements the standards of an assertive community treatment team as prescribed by Assembly Bill 1421, and thus meet the acuity level of a full service partnership. This program provides an experienced, multi-disciplinary team who provides around the clock mobile, out-of-office interventions to adults, a low participant to staff ratio, and provides the full spectrum of services, to include health, substance abuse, vocational and housing services. Persons deemed eligible for assisted outpatient treatment are served, whether they volunteer for services, or are ordered by the court to participate. CCBHS contracts with Mental Health Systems, Inc. to provide the Assertive Community Treatment (ACT), while CCBHS has dedicated clinicians and administrative support within the Forensic Mental Health Clinic to 1) receive referrals in the community, 2) conduct outreach and engagement to assist a referred individual, 3) conduct the investigation and determination of whether a client meets eligibility criteria for AOT, 4) prepare Court Petitions with supporting documentation and ongoing affidavits, 5) testify in court, 6) coordinate with County Counsel, Public Defender and law enforcement jurisdictions, 7) act as liaison with ACT contractor, and 8) participate in the development of the treatment plan. The Assisted Outpatient Treatment Program is summarized below: Program/Plan Element County/Contract Region Served Number to be Served Yearly MHSA Funds Allocated for FY 17-18 Assisted Outpatient Treatment Mental Health Systems, Inc. Countywide 75 1,957,000 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 730 Assisted Outpatient Treatment Clinic Support County Operated Countywide Support for Assisted Outpatient Treatment 435,241 Total 75 $2,392,241 Wellness and Recovery Centers. Recovery Innovations contracts with the County to provide wellness and recovery centers situated in West, Central and East County to ensure the full spectrum of mental health services is available. These centers offer peer-led recovery-oriented, rehabilitation and self-help groups, which teach self-management and coping skills. The centers offer wellness recovery action plan (WRAP) groups, physical health and nutrition education, advocacy services and training, arts and crafts, and support groups. Program/Plan Element County/Contract Region Served Number to be Served Yearly MHSA Funds Allocated for FY 17-18 Recovery and Wellness Centers Recovery Innovations West, Central, East County 200 901,250 Total 200 $901,250 Hope House - Crisis Residential Program. The County contracts with Telecare to operate a recently constructed MHSA financed 16 bed residential facility. This is a voluntary, highly structured treatment program that is intended to support seriously mentally ill adults during a period of crisis and to avoid in-patient psychiatric hospitalization. It also serves consumers being discharged from the hospital and long term locked facilities that would benefit from a step-down from institutional care in order to successfully transition back into community living. Services are designed to be up to a month in duration, are recovery focused with a peer provider component, and will be able to treat co-occurring disorders, such as drug and alcohol abuse. The Crisis Residential Program is summarized below: Program County/Contract Region Served Number to be Served Yearly MHSA Funds Allocated for FY 17-18 Hope House - Crisis Residential Program Telecare Countywide 200 2,077,530 Total 200 $2,077,530 Oak Grove Youth Residential Program. The County is in planning stages to re- purpose their county owned Oak Grove facility in Concord to establish a 16 bed residential June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 731 treatment facility for youth ages 18-26. This will be a co-located residential and supportive services operation to provide voluntary community level treatment with safe and stable housing for the most vulnerable and at-risk youth who are experiencing serious mental health issues. The planning process will include stakeholder participation in planning the facility and its operations, to be followed by a competitive bid process to select a vendor to operate the program. Initial funding for FY 2017-18 is included for program and budget planning and start- up costs, with implementation later in the fiscal year. MHSA Three Year Plan Updates will address full year costs when more definitive information is available. First Year costs are summarized below: Program Contract Region Served Number to be Served Yearly MHSA Funds Allocated for FY 17-18 Oak Grove Youth Residential Program To be determined Countywide Up to 16 beds $250,000 Total 24 (est) $250,000 MHSA Housing Services. MHSA funded housing services supplements services provided by CCBHS and the County’s Health, Housing and Homeless Services Division, and is designed to provide affordable housing for low income adults with a serious mental illness or children with a severe emotional disorder and their families who are homeless or at imminent risk of being homeless. The annual budget from the FY 2014-17 to FY 2017-20 has been increased from $5.1 million to $8 million to reflect the increase in commitment to permanent supportive housing, as well as to keep pace with the increased cost of housing. Housing supports is comprised of five elements; 1) supportive housing, 2) augmented board and care facilities, 3) temporary shelter beds, 4) permanent housing units, and 5) a centralized county operated coordination team. 1. Supportive Housing. Shelter, Inc. contracts with the County to provide a master leasing program, in which adults or children and their families are provided tenancy in apartments and houses throughout the County. Through a combination of self-owned units and agreements with landlords Shelter, Inc. acts as the lessee to the owners and provides staff to support individuals and their families move in and maintain their homes independently. In addition, a number of potential permanent supportive housing initiatives, both local and statewide, are emerging where construction and/or re-purposing of housing units are being proposed during the upcoming Three Year Plan period. In July 2016 Assembly Bill 1618, or “No Place Like Home”, was enacted to dedicate in future years June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 732 $2 billion in bond proceeds throughout the State to invest in the development of permanent supportive housing for persons who are in need of mental health services and are experiencing homelessness or at risk of chronic homelessness. Also, a number of local concepts for construction and/or re-purposing of residential sites have been put forth. The County will need to demonstrate how supportive mental health services will be brought to the individuals who will be residing in these units. It is anticipated that mental health care as part of these units will necessitate an augmentation of current MHSA funds for supportive housing. The Health, Housing and Homeless Division will take the lead during the upcoming Three Year Plan to make recommendations to the County for the appropriate level of permanent supportive housing units to be constructed/re-purposed, the funding sources, and, upon Board of Supervisor direction, implement a fair and impartial competitive process for determining any potential developer entities. The Health, Housing and Homeless Division will then partner with CCBHS to determine what additional level of County MHSA funds for mental health services will need to be authorized. A $220,000 placeholder in the annual supportive housing services budget has been added with stakeholder support, and will be adjusted as projects are planned and brought before the Board of Supervisors. 2. Augmented Board and Care. The County contracts with a number of licensed board and care providers and facilities to provide additional funds to augment the rental amount received by the facility from the SSI rental allowance. These additional funds pay for facility staff care to enable those with serious mental illness to avoid institutionalization and enable them to live in the community. An individualized services agreement for each person with a serious mental illness delineates needed supplemental care, such as assistance with personal hygiene, life skills, prescribed medication, transportation to health/mental health appointments, and connection with healthy social activities. Of these 26 augmented board and care providers, seven are MHSA funded, and are facilities that augment their board and care with augmented care for the seriously mentally ill. An eighth provider, Crestwood Healing Center, has 64 augmented board and care beds in Pleasant Hill and 46 in Vallejo. In addition, Crestwood’s Pleasant Hill facility has a 16 bed Pathways program that provides clinical mental health specialty services for up to a year (with a possible six month extension) for those residents considered to be most compromised by mental health issues. 3. Temporary Shelter Beds. The County’s Health, Housing and Homeless Services Division operates a number of temporary bed facilities for adults and transitional age youth. CCBHS has a Memorandum of Understanding with the Health, Housing and Homeless Services Division that provides MHSA funding to enable individuals with a serious mental illness or a serious emotional disturbance to receive temporary emergency housing in these facilities. This agreement includes 400 bed nights per year June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 733 for the Bissell Cottages and Appian House Transitional Living Programs, staff for the Calli House Youth Shelter, 23,360 bed nights for the Brookside and Concord temporary shelters, and 3,260 bed nights for the Respite Shelter in Concord. 4. Permanent Housing Units. Until 2016 the County participated in a specially legislated state run MHSA Housing Program through the California Housing Finance Agency (CalHFA). In collaboration with many community partners the County embarked on a number of one-time capitalization projects to create 50 permanent housing units for individuals with serious mental illness. These individuals receive their mental health support from CCBHS contract and county service providers. The sites include Villa Vasconcellos in Walnut Creek, Lillie Mae Jones Plaza in North Richmond, The Virginia Street Apartments in Richmond, Tabora Gardens in Antioch, Robin Lane apartments in Concord, Ohlone Garden apartments in El Cerrito, Third Avenue Apartments in Walnut Creek, Garden Park apartments in Concord, and scattered units throughout the County operated by Anka Behavioral Health. The aforementioned state run program ended in 2016, and was replaced by the Special Needs Housing Program (SNHP). The Contra Costa Board of Supervisors authorized this program to be locally administered by the County’s Health, Housing and Homeless Division. In September 2016 the County received $1.72 million in heretofore state level MHSA funds as the unspent balance from the previous CalHFA program. These funds have been added as unspent funds from previous years in the County’s MHSA Fund. Health, Housing and Homeless Division will take the lead during the upcoming Three Year Plan to establish via Request for Proposals a competitive process to consider and award those proposals that best implement the purpose of the SNHP. This purpose is to provide permanent supportive housing assistance to the seriously mentally ill. Housing assistance means capital funding to build or rehabilitate housing for persons who are seriously mentally ill and homeless or at risk of homelessness. Funds can also be utilized for capitalized operating subsidies, rental assistance, security deposits, utility deposits, or other move-in cost assistance. 5. Coordination Team. Mental Health Housing Services Coordinator and staff work closely with the Health, Housing and Homeless Services Division staff to coordinate referrals and placements, facilitate linkages with other Contra Costa mental health programs and services, and provide contract monitoring and quality control. The allocation for MHSA funded housing services is summarized below: Plan Element County/Contract Region Served Number of MHSA beds, units budgeted MHSA Funds Allocated for FY 17-18 Supportive Housing Shelter, Inc. Countywide 119 units 2,281,484 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 734 Supportive Housing Housing initiative to be determined Countywide To be determined 220,000 (estimated) Augmented Board and Care* Crestwood: Healing Center Our House Pleasant Hill Vallejo 80 beds 46 beds 1,140,877 Augmented Board and Care* Divines West County 6 beds 5,184 Augmented Board and Care* Modesto Residential Modesto 6 beds 71,175 Augmented Board and Care* Oak Hill East County 6 beds 16,315 Augmented Board and Care* Pleasant Hill Manor Central County 18 beds 92,700 Augmented Board and Care* United Family Care (Family Courtyard) West County 61 beds 453,840 Augmented Board and Care* Williams Board and Care Home West County 6 beds 31,889 Augmented Board and Care* Woodhaven Central County 4 beds 12,360 Shelter Beds County Operated Countywide 75 beds (est) 1,931,296 Permanent Housing County Operated Countywide 50 units One time funding spent Permanent Housing County Operated Countywide To be determined One time funding of $1,722,486 to be allocated Coordination Team County Operated Countywide Support to Homeless Program 522,511 Total ** $8,502,117 *Augmented Board and Care facility contracts vary in negotiated daily rate, and several contracts have both realignment as well as MHSA as funding sources. Thus the budgeted amount for FY 17-18 may not match the total contract limit for the facility. Beds available and the amount of MHSA funds budgeted are projections based upon the 1) history of actual utilization of beds paid by MHSA funding, 2) history of expenditures charged to MHSA, and 3) projected utilization for the upcoming year. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 735 ** It is estimated that over 700 individuals per year will receive temporary or permanent supportive housing by means of MHSA funded housing services. General System Development General System Development is the service category in which the County uses Mental Health Services Act funds to improve the County’s mental health service delivery system for all clients who experience a serious mental illness or serious emotional disturbance, and to pay for mental health services for specific groups of clients, and, when appropriate, their families. Since the Community Services and Supports component was first approved in 2006, programs and plan elements included herein have been incrementally added each year by means of the community program planning process. These services are designed to support those individuals who need services the most. Funds are now allocated in the General System Development category for the following programs and services designed to improve the overall system of care: Supporting Older Adults. There are two MHSA funded programs serving the older adult population over the age of 60, 1) Intensive Care Management, and 2) IMPACT (Improving Mood: Providing Access to Collaborative Treatment). 1) Intensive Care Management. Three multi-disciplinary teams, one for each region of the County provide mental health services to older adults in their homes, in the community, and within a clinical setting. The primary goal is to support aging in place and to improve consumers’ mental health, physical health and overall quality of life. Each multi-disciplinary team is comprised of a psychiatrist, a nurse, a clinical specialist, and a community support worker. The teams deliver a comprehensive array of care management services, linkage to primary care and community programs, advocacy, educational outreach, medication support and monitoring, and transportation assistance. 2) IMPACT. IMPACT is an evidence-based practice which provides depression treatment to older adults in a primary care setting who are experiencing co-occurring physical health impairments. The model involves short-term (8 to 12 visits) problem solving therapy and medication support, with up to one year follow-up as necessary. MHSA funded mental health clinicians are integrated into a primary treatment team. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 736 The Older Adult Mental Health Program is summarized below: Program County/Contract Region Served Number to be Served Yearly MHSA Funds Allocated for FY 17-18 Intensive Care Management County Operated Countywide 237 2,995,707 IMPACT County Operated Countywide 138 392,362 Total 375 $3,388,069 Supporting Children and Young Adults. There are two programs supplemented by MHSA funding that serve children and young adults; 1) Wraparound Program, and 2) EPSDT Expansion. 1) Wraparound Program. The County’s Wraparound Program, in which children and their families receive intensive, multi-leveled treatment from the County’s three children’s mental health clinics, was augmented in 2008 by family partners and mental health specialists. Family partners are individuals with lived experience as parents of children and adults with serious emotional disturbance or serious mental illness who assist families with advocacy, transportation, navigation of the service system, and offer support in the home, community, and county service sites. Family partners participate as team members with the mental health clinicians who are providing treatment to children and their families. Mental Health Specialists are non-licensed care providers who can address culture and language specific needs of families in their communities. These professionals arrange and facilitate team meetings between the family, treatment providers and allied system professionals. 2) EPSDT Expansion. Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment (EPSDT) is a federally mandated specialty mental health program that provides comprehensive and preventative services to low income children and adolescents that are conjointly involved with Children and Family Services. State realignment funds have been utilized as the up-front match for the subsequent federal reimbursement that enables the County to provide the full scope of services. This includes assessment, plan development, therapy, rehabilitation, collateral services, case management, medication support, crisis services, intensive home based services (IHBS), and Intensive Care Coordination (ICC). Recently the Department of Health Care Services has clarified that the continuum of EPSDT services are to be provided to any specialty mental health service beneficiary who needs it. In addition, newly enacted Assembly Bill 403 mandates statewide reform for care provided to foster care children, to include the County’s responsibility to provide Therapeutic Foster Care (TFC) services. This significant expansion of care responsibility, entitled Continuing Care Reform (CCR), will utilize MHSA funds as the up-front match for the subsequent federal reimbursement that enables the County to provide the full scope of services, and includes adding County mental health clinicians, family partners and administrative support. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 737 The MHSA funded portion of the Children and Young Adult Programs are summarized below: Plan Element County/Contract Region Served Number to be Served Yearly MHSA Annual Funds Allocated Wraparound Support County Operated Countywide Supports Wraparound Program 1,606,329 EPSDT Expansion County Operated Countywide Supports EPSDT Expansion 2,500,000* Total $4,106,329 * Estimated federal reimbursement is projected to offset the MHSA funded portion of the EPSDT expansion, and will be returned to the MHSA fund. Miller Wellness Center. The County has completed construction on a separate building near the Contra Costa Regional Medical Center that houses an assessment and recovery center. This county operated mental health treatment program for both children and adults is co-located with a primary care site, and is utilized to divert adults and families from the psychiatric emergency services (PES) located at the Regional Medical Center. Through a close relationship with Psychiatric Emergency Services children and adults who are evaluated at PES can quickly step down to the services at the Miller Wellness Center if they do not need hospital level of care. The Miller Wellness Center will also allow for urgent same day appointments for individuals who either are not open to the Contra Costa Behavioral Health System of Care, or have disconnected from care after previously been seen. The Miller Wellness Center is certified as a federally qualified health center, and as such, receives federal financial participation for provision of specialty mental health services. MHSA funding is utilized to supplement this staffing pattern with two community support workers to act as peer and family partner providers, and a program manager. The MHSA allocation for the Miller Wellness Center is summarized below: Plan Element County/Contract Region Served Number to be Served Yearly MHSA Funds Allocated for FY 17-18 Supporting the Miller Wellness Center County Operated Countywide Supports clients served by MWC 319,819 Total $319,819 Concord Health Center. The County’s primary care system staffs the Concord Health Center, which integrates primary and behavioral health care. Two mental health clinicians are June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 738 funded by MHSA to enable a multi-disciplinary team to provide an integrated response to adults visiting the clinic for medical services who have a co-occurring mental illness. The allocation for this plan element is summarized below: Plan Element County/Contract Region Served Number to be Served Yearly MHSA Funds Allocated for FY 17-18 Supporting the Concord Health Center County Operated Central County Supports clients served by Concord Health Center 265,071 Total $265,071 Liaison Staff. CCBHS partners with CCRMC to provide Community Support Worker positions to liaison with Psychiatric Emergency Services (PES) in order to assist individuals experiencing a psychiatric crisis connect with services that will support them in the community. These positions are on the CCBHS Transition Team, and schedule regular hours at PES. The allocation for the Liaison Staff is summarized below: Plan Element County/Contract Region Served Number to be Served Yearly MHSA Funds Allocated for FY 17-18 Liaison Staff County Operated Countywide Supports PES 139,139 Total $139,139 Clinic Support. County positions are funded through MHSA to supplement clinical staff implementing treatment plans at the adult clinics. These positions were created in direct response to identified needs surfaced in Community Program Planning processes. 1) Resource Planning and Management. Dedicated staff at the three adult clinics assist consumers with money management and the complexities of eligibility for Medi-Cal, Medi-Care, Supplemental Security Income (SSI) and Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) benefits. Money management staff are allocated for each clinic, and work with and are trained by financial specialists. 2) Transportation Support. The Community Program Planning Process identified transportation to and from clinics as a critical priority for accessing services. Toward this end one-time MHSA funds were utilized in Fiscal Years 2013-14 and 14-15 to purchase additional county vehicles to be located at the clinics. Community Support Workers, one for each adult clinic, have been added to the three clinics to be dedicated to the transporting of consumers to and from appointments. 3) Evidence Based Practices. Clinical Specialists, one for each Children’s clinic, have been added to provide training and technical assistance in adherence to the fidelity of June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 739 treatment practices that have an established body of evidence that support successful outcomes. The allocation for Clinic Support Staff are as follows: Plan Element County/Contract Region Served Number to be Served Yearly MHSA Funds Allocated for FY 17-18 Resource Planning and Management County Operated Countywide Clinic Support 732,077 Transportation Support County Operated Countywide Clinic Support 131,097 Evidence Based Practices County Operated Countywide Clinic Support 425,795 Total $1,288,969 Forensic Team. Clinical specialists are funded by MHSA to join a multi-disciplinary team that provides mental health services, alcohol and drug treatment, and housing services to individuals with serious mental illness who are on probation and at risk of re-offending and incarceration. These individuals were determined to be high users of psychiatric emergency services and other public resources, but very low users of the level and type of care needed. This team works very closely with the criminal justice system to assess referrals for serious mental illness, provide rapid access to a treatment plan, and work as a team to provide the appropriate mental health, substance abuse and housing services needed. Mobile Crisis Intervention Team. Currently the Forensic Team partners with law enforcement to field a Mental Health Evaluation Team (MHET). Funded by a state grant licensed clinicians (one for each County region) ride along with a Sherriff’s Department officer assigned to the team, and the MHET contacts individuals in the community who have been referred by various law enforcement jurisdictions. Referrals are persons who have been in contact with the police on numerous occasions due to psychiatric issues, and are at a high risk for hospitalization or incarceration. The team evaluates the contacted individual and coordinates appropriate care in order to avoid a more restrictive intervention. For this Three Year Plan MHSA funds will be used to augment and expand the capacity of the Forensic Team in order to field a countywide mobile crisis response intervention for adult consumers experiencing mental health crises. Mental health clinicians and community support workers will work closely with the County’s Psychiatric Emergency Services and law enforcement, if necessary, to address the high volume of residents in crises who would be better served in their respective communities. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 740 The allocation for mental health clinicians on the Forensic Team are as follows: Plan Element County/Contract Region Served Number to be Served Yearly MHSA Annual Funds Allocated Forensic Team County Operated Countywide Support to the Forensic Team 982,245 Total $982,245 Quality Assurance and Administrative Support. In 2008, the County first added needed positions via MHSA funding to perform various administrative support and quality assurance functions for statutory, regulatory and contractual compliance, as well as management of quality of care protocol. County staff time and funding to support the community program planning process are also included here. Utilizing the state’s allowance guide of 15% of total MHSA budget for this support element, the County’s total percentage has varied from 10% to 12% each year. County positions have been incrementally justified, authorized and added each year as the total MHSA budget has increased. Contra Costa County’s Board of Supervisors directed that the Health Services Department develop an evaluation design for the Assisted Outpatient Treatment (AOT) program to determine the difference, if any, in program impact and cost savings to the County for individuals ordered to participate in services versus those individuals who voluntarily participate in the same level and type of service. The implementation of AOT is a three-year term project, with continuance contingent upon demonstration of the efficacy of court ordered outpatient treatment. Resource Development Associates was selected as the Principal Investigator through a competitive bid process to apply their proposed independent, objective social research design to Contra Costa’s AOT Program. The evaluation is expected to be ongoing through the Three year Plan. The following functions and positions are summarized below: 1) Quality Assurance. Function MHSA Funds Allocated for FY 17-18 Medication Monitoring 231,379 Clinical Quality Management 688,751 Clerical Support 327,876 Total $1,248,006 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 741 2) Administrative Support. Function MHSA Funds Allocated for FY 17-18 Program and Project Managers 692,619 Clinical Coordinator 118,923 Planner/Evaluators 322,479 Family Service Coordinator 81,972 Administrative and Financial Analysts 575,106 Clerical Support 213,836 Community Planning 12,360 Assisted Outpatient Treatment Evaluation 100,000 Total $2,117,296 Community Services and Supports (CSS) FY 17-18 Program Budget Summary Full Service Partnerships Number to be Served: 566 23,747,624 Children 2,798,275 Transition Age Youth 2,157,611 Adults 2,896,455 Adult Clinic Support 1,772,145 Assisted Outpatient Treatment 2,392,241 Wellness and Recovery Centers 901,250 Crisis Residential Center 2,077,530 MHSA Housing Services 8,502,117 Oak Grove Youth Residential Program 250,000 General System Development 13,854,943 Older Adults 3,388,069 Children’s Wraparound, EPSDT Support 4,106,329 Miller Wellness Center 319,819 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 742 Concord Health Center 265,071 Liaison Staff 139,139 Clinic Support 1,288,969 Forensic Team 982,245 Quality Assurance 1,248,006 Administrative Support 2,117,296 Total $37,602,567 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 743 Prevention and Early Intervention Prevention and Early Intervention (PEI) is the component of the Three-Year Plan that refers to services designed to prevent mental illnesses from becoming severe and disabling. This means providing outreach and engagement to increase recognition of early signs of mental illness, and intervening early in the onset of a mental illness. First approved in 2009, with an initial State appropriation of $5.5 million Contra Costa’s Prevention and Early Intervention budget has grown incrementally to $8.7 million for FY 2017- 18 in commitments to programs and services. The construction and direction of how and where to provide funding for this component began with an extensive and comprehensive community program planning process that was similar to that conducted in 2005-06 for the Community Services and Support component. Underserved and at risk populations were researched, stakeholders actively participated in identifying and prioritizing mental health needs, and strategies were developed to meet these needs. The programs and services described below are directly derived from this initial planning process, and expanded by subsequent yearly community program planning processes, to include current year. New regulations for the PEI component went into effect on October 6, 2015. Programs in this component now focus their programming on one of the following seven PEI categories: 1) outreach for increasing recognition of early signs of mental illness; 2) prevention; 3) early intervention; 4) access and linkage to treatment; 5) improving timely access to mental health services for underserved populations; 6) stigma and discrimination reduction; 7) suicide prevention. All of the programs contained in this component help create access and linkage to mental health treatment, with an emphasis on utilizing non-stigmatizing and non-discriminatory strategies, as well as outreach and engagement to those populations who have been identified as traditionally underserved. Outcome Indicators. PEI regulations also have new data reporting requirements that will enable CCBHS to report on the following outcome indicators: • Outreach to Underserved Populations. Demographic data, such as age group, race/ethnicity, primary language and sexual orientation, enable an assessment of the impact of outreach and engagement efforts over time. • Linkage to Mental Health Care. Number of people connected to care, and average duration of reported untreated mental illness enable an assessment over time of impact of programs on connecting people to mental health care. Starting July 2016 programs have been reporting on the above indicators, and baseline data will be available in Fiscal Year 2017-18 for data gathered for FY 2016-17. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 744 For the Three Year Plan for FY 2017-20 PEI programs are listed within the seven categories delineated in the PEI regulations. Outreach for Increasing Recognition of Early Signs of Mental Illness Programs in this category provide outreach to individuals with signs and symptoms of mental illness so they can recognize and respond to their own symptoms. Outreach is engaging, educating and learning from potential primary responders. Primary responders include, but are not limited to, families, employers, law enforcement, school, community service providers, primary health care, social services and faith based organizations. a. Seven programs are included in this category: 1) Asian Family Resource Center provides culturally-sensitive education and access to mental health services for immigrant Asian communities, especially the Southeast Asian and Chinese population of Contra Costa County. Staff provide outreach, medication compliance education, community integration skills, and mental health system navigation. Early intervention services are provided to those exhibiting symptoms of mental illness, and participants are assisted in actively managing their own recovery process. 2) The Counseling Options Parenting Education (COPE) Family Support Center utilizes the evidence based practices of the Positive Parenting Program to help parents develop effective skills to address common child and youth behavioral issues that can lead to serious emotional disturbances. Targeting families residing in underserved communities this program delivers in English and Spanish a number of seminars, training classes and groups throughout the year. 3) First Five of Contra Costa, in partnership with the COPE Family Support Center, takes the lead in training families who have children up to the age of five. First Five also partners with the COPE Family Support Center to provide training in the Positive Parenting Program method to mental health practitioners who serve this at- risk population. 4) Contra Costa Interfaith Housing provides on-site services to formerly homeless families, all with special needs, at the Garden Park Apartments in Pleasant Hill, the Bella Monte Apartments in Bay Point, and Los Medanos Village in Pittsburg. Services include pre-school and afterschool programs, such as teen and family support groups, assistance with school preparation, and homework clubs. These services are designed to prevent serious mental illness by addressing domestic violence, substance addiction and inadequate life and parenting skills. 5) Jewish Family and Children’s Services of the East Bay provides culturally grounded, community-directed mental health education and navigation services to refugees and immigrants of all ages in the Latino, Afghan, Bosnian, Iranian and Russian communities of Central and East County. Outreach and engagement services are provided in the context of group settings and community cultural June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 745 events that utilize a variety of non-office settings convenient to individuals and families. 6) The Native American Health Center provides a variety of culturally specific methods of outreach and engagement to educate Native Americans throughout the County regarding mental illness, identify those at risk for developing a serious mental illness, and help them access and navigate the human service systems in the County. Methods include an elder support group, a youth wellness group, a traditional arts group, talking circles, Positive Indian Parenting sessions, and Gatherings of Native Americans. 7) The Latina Center serves Latino parents and caregivers in West Contra Costa County by providing culturally and linguistically specific twelve-week parent education classes to high risk families utilizing the evidence based curriculum of Systematic Training for Effective Parenting (STEP). In addition, the Latina Center trains parents with lived experience to both conduct parenting education classes and to become Parent Partners who can offer mentoring, emotional support and assistance in navigating social service and mental health systems. b. The allocation for this category is summarized below: Program Region Served Number to be Served Yearly MHSA Funds Allocated for FY 17-18 Asian Family Resource Center Countywide 50 137,917 COPE Countywide 210 238,703 First Five Countywide (numbers included in COPE) 79,568 Interfaith Housing Central and East County 170 70,000 Jewish Community Services Central and East County 350 169,403 Native American Health Center Countywide 150 231,419 The Latina Center West County 300 108,565 Total 1,230 $1,035,575 Prevention Programs in this category provide activities intended to reduce risk factors for developing a potentially serious mental illness, and to increase protective factors. Risk factors may include, but are not limited to, poverty, ongoing stress, trauma, racism, social inequality, substance June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 746 abuse, domestic violence, previous mental illness, prolonged isolation, and may include relapse prevention for those in recovery from a serious mental illness. a. Five programs are included in this category: 1) The Building Blocks for Kids Collaborative, located in the Iron Triangle of Richmond, train family partners from the community with lived mental health experience to reach out and engage at-risk families in activities that address family mental health challenges. Individual and group wellness activities assist participants make and implement plans of action, access community services, and integrate them into higher levels of mental health treatment as needed. 2) The New Leaf Program at Vicente Continuation High School in the Martinez Unified School District provides career academies for at-risk youth that include individualized learning plans, learning projects, internships, and mental health education and counseling support. Students, school staff, parents and community partners work together on projects designed to develop leadership skills, a healthy lifestyle and pursuit of career goals. 3) People Who Care is an after school program serving the communities of Pittsburg and Bay Point that is designed to accept referrals of at-risk youth from schools, juvenile justice systems and behavioral health treatment programs. Various vocational projects are conducted both on and off the program’s premises, with selected participants receiving stipends to encourage leadership development. A licensed clinical specialist provides emotional, social and behavioral treatment through individual and group therapy. 4) Putnam Clubhouse provides peer-based programming for adults throughout Contra Costa County who are in recovery from a serious mental illness. Following the internationally recognized clubhouse model this structured, work focused programming helps individuals develop support networks, career development skills, and the self-confidence needed to sustain stable, productive and more independent lives. Features of the program provide respite support to family members, peer-to-peer outreach, and special programming for transition age youth and young adults. 5) The RYSE Center provides a constellation of age-appropriate activities that enable at-risk youth in Richmond to effectively cope with the continuous presence of violence and trauma in the community and at home. These trauma informed programs and services include drop-in, recreational and structured activities across areas of health and wellness, media, arts and culture, education and career, technology, and developing youth leadership and organizing capacity. The RYSE Center facilitates a number of city and system-wide training and technical assistance events to educate the community on mental health interventions that can prevent serious mental illness as a result of trauma and violence. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 747 b. The allocation for this category is summarized below: Program Region Served Number to be Served Yearly MHSA Funds Allocated for FY 17-18 Building Blocks for Kids West County 400 210,580 New Leaf Central County 80 180,353 People Who Care East County 200 216,604 Putnam Clubhouse Countywide 300 565,883 RYSE West County 2,000 488,368 Total 2,980 $1,661,788 Early Intervention Early intervention provides mental health treatment for persons with a serious emotional disturbance or mental illness early in its emergence. a. The County operated First Hope Program serves youth who show early signs of psychosis, or have recently experienced a first psychotic episode. Referrals are accepted from all parts of the County, and through a comprehensive assessment process young people, ages 12-25, and their families are helped to determine whether First Hope is the best treatment to address the psychotic illness and associated disability. A multi-disciplinary team provides intensive care to the individual and their family, and consists of psychiatrists, mental health clinicians, occupational therapists and employment/education specialists. These services are based on the Portland Identification and Early Referral (PIER) Model, and consists of multi-family group therapy, psychiatric care, family psycho-education, education and employment support, and occupational therapy. b. The allocation for this program is summarized below: Program Region Served Number to be Served Yearly Funds Allocated for FY 17-18 First Hope Countywide 200 2,377,280 Total 200 $2,377,280 Access and Linkage to Treatment Programs in this category have a primary focus on screening, assessment, and connecting children and adults as early as practicable to necessary mental health care and treatment. a. Four programs are included in this category: June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 748 1) The James Morehouse Project at El Cerrito High School, a student health center that partners with community based organizations, government agencies and local universities, provides a range of youth development groups designed to increase access to mental health services for at-risk high school students. These on- campus groups address coping with anger, violence and bereavement, factors leading to substance abuse, teen parenting and caretaking, peer conflict and immigration acculturation. 2) STAND! Against Domestic Violence utilizes established curricula to assist youth successfully address the debilitating effects of violence occurring both at home and in teen relationships. Fifteen week support groups are held for teens throughout the County, and teachers and other school personnel are assisted with education and awareness with which to identify and address unhealthy relationships amongst teens that lead to serious mental health issues. 3) Experiencing the Juvenile Justice System. Within the County operated Children’s Services five mental health clinicians support families who are experiencing the juvenile justice system due to their adolescent children’s involvement with the law. Three clinicians are out-stationed at juvenile probation offices, and two clinicians work with the Oren Allen Youth Ranch. The clinicians provide direct short-term therapy and coordinate appropriate linkages to services and supports as youth transition back into their communities. 4) Women Embracing Life and Learning (WELL). This program is a collaboration between CCBHS, Public Health Nursing and the Women, Infant and Child (WIC) program. This service integrates a coordinated approach to addressing perinatal and post-partum depression among women in order to improve health outcomes and prevent serious mental illness. The Central County WIC office screens for symptoms of depression, refers women at risk to the multi-disciplinary team, and the team provides one-on-one and group counseling, medication support as appropriate, and referral and linkage to additional treatment as needed. b. The allocation for this category is summarized below: Program Region Served Number to be Served Yearly Funds Allocated for FY 17-18 James Morehouse Project West County 300 99,900 STAND! Against Domestic Violence Countywide 750 130,207 Experiencing Juvenile Justice Countywide 300 702,521 WELL Project Central County 50 203,673 Total 1,400 $1,136,301 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 749 Improving Timely Access to Mental Health Services for Underserved Populations. Programs in this category provide mental health services as early as possible for individuals and their families from an underserved population. Underserved means not having access due to challenges in the identification of mental health needs, limited language access, or lack of culturally appropriate mental health services. Programs in this category feature cultural and language appropriate services in convenient, accessible settings. a. Six programs are included in this category: 1) The Center for Human Development serves the primarily African American population of Bay Point in Eastern Contra Costa County. Services consist of culturally appropriate education on mental health issues through support groups and workshops. Participants at risk for developing a serious mental illness receive assistance with referral and access to County mental health services. In addition, the Center for Human Development provides mental health education and supports for gay, lesbian, bi-sexual, and questioning youth and their supports in East County to work toward more inclusion and acceptance within schools and in the community. 2) The Child Abuse Prevention Council of Contra Costa provides a 23 week curriculum designed to build new parenting skills and alter old behavioral patterns, and is intended to strengthen families and support the healthy development of their children. The program is designed to meet the needs of Spanish speaking families in East and Central Counties. 3) La Clinica de la Raza reaches out to at-risk Latina/os in Central and East County to provide behavioral health assessments and culturally appropriate early intervention services to address symptoms of mental illness brought about by trauma, domestic violence and substance abuse. Clinical staff also provide psycho-educational groups that address the stress factors that lead to serious mental illness. 4) Lao Family Community Development provides a comprehensive and culturally sensitive integrated system of care for Asian and Southeast Asian adults and families in West Contra Costa County. Staff provide comprehensive case management services, to include home visits, counseling, parenting classes, and assistance accessing employment, financial management, housing, and other service both within and outside the agency. 5) Lifelong Medical Care provides isolated older adults in West County opportunities for social engagement and access to mental health and social services. A variety of group and one-on-one approaches are employed in three housing developments to engage frail, older adults in social activities, provide screening for depression and other mental and medical health issues, and linking them to appropriate services. 6) Rainbow Community Center provides a community based social support program designed to decrease isolation, depression and suicidal ideation among members June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 750 who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, or who question their sexual identity. Key activities include reaching out to the community in order to engage those individuals who are at risk, providing mental health support groups that address isolation and stigma and promote wellness and resiliency, and providing clinical mental health treatment and intervention for those individuals who are identified as seriously mentally ill. b. The allocation for this category is summarized below: Program Region Served Number to be Served Yearly Funds Allocated for FY 2017-18 Child Abuse Prevention Council Central and East County 120 121,465 Center for Human Development East County 230 142,129 La Clinica de la Raza Central and East County 3,750 272,386 Lao Family Community Development West County 120 180,275 Lifelong Medical Care West County 115 126,977 Rainbow Community Center Countywide 1,125 737,245 Total 5,460 $1,580,477 Stigma and Discrimination Reduction Activities in this category are designed to 1) reduce negative feelings, attitudes, beliefs, perceptions, stereotypes and/or discrimination related to having a mental illness, 2) increase acceptance, dignity, inclusion and equity for individuals with mental illness and their families, and 3) are culturally congruent with the values of the population for whom changes, attitudes, knowledge and behavior are intended. a. The County operated Office for Consumer Empowerment (OCE) provides leadership and staff support to a number of initiatives designed to reduce stigma and discrimination, develop leadership and advocacy skills among consumers of behavioral health services, support the role of peers as providers, and encourage consumers to actively participate in the planning and evaluation of MHSA funded services. Staff from the OCE support the following activities designed to educate the community in order to raise awareness of the stigma that can accompany mental illness. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 751 1) The PhotoVoice Empowerment Project enables consumers to produce artwork that speaks to the prejudice and discrimination that people with behavioral health challenges face. PhotoVoice’s vision is to enable people to record and reflect their community’s strengths and concerns, promote critical dialogue about personal and community issues, and to reach policymakers to effect change. 2) The Wellness Recovery Education for Acceptance, Choice and Hope (WREACH) Speakers’ Bureau forms connections between people in the community and people with lived mental health and co-occurring experiences, using face to face contact by providing stories of recovery and resiliency and current information on health treatment and supports. Other related activities include producing videos, public service announcements and educational materials. 3) The OCE facilitates Wellness Recovery Action Plan (WRAP) groups by providing certified leaders and conducting classes throughout the County. Staff employ the evidence-based WRAP system in enhancing the efforts of consumers to promote and advocate for their own wellness. OCE also supports a writers’ group in partnership with the Contra Costa affiliate of the National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI). 4) The Committee for Social Inclusion is an ongoing alliance of committee members that work together to promote social inclusion of persons who receive behavioral health services. The Committee is project based, and projects are designed to increase participation of consumers and family members in the planning, implementation and delivery of services. Current efforts are supporting the integration of mental health and alcohol and other drug services within the Behavioral Health Services Division. In addition, OCE staff assist and support consumers and family members in participating in the various planning committees and sub-committees, Mental Health Commission meetings, community forums, and other opportunities to participate in planning processes. 5) Through the Each Mind Matters initiative California Mental Health Services Authority (CalMHSA) will provide technical assistance to encourage the County’s integration of available statewide resources on stigma and discrimination reduction and suicide prevention. For FY 2017-20 CCBHS will partner via Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with CalMHSA to link county level stigma and discrimination reduction efforts with statewide social marketing programs. This linkage will expand the County’s capacity via language specific materials, social media, and subject matter consultation with regional and state experts to reach diverse underserved communities, such as Hispanic, African American, Asian Pacific Islander, LGBTQ, Native American and immigrant communities. Primary focus will be to reach Spanish speaking Latina/o communities via social media and materials adapted specifically for this population. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 752 b. The allocation for stigma and discrimination efforts are summarized below: Program County/Contract Region Served Funds Allocated for FY 17-18 OCE County Operated Countywide 217,495 CalMHSA MOU Countywide 78,000 Total $295,495 Suicide Prevention a. There are three plan elements that augment the County’s efforts to reduce the number of suicides in Contra Costa County; 1) augmenting the Contra Costa Crisis Center, 2) dedicating a clinical specialist to support the County’s adult clinics, and 3) supporting a suicide prevention committee. 1) The Contra Costa Crisis Center provides services to prevent suicides by operating a certified twenty four hour suicide prevention hotline. The hotline connects with people when they are most vulnerable and at risk for suicide, enhances safety, and builds a bridge to community resources. Staff conduct a lethality assessment on each call, provide support and intervention for the person in crisis, and make follow- up calls (with the caller’s consent) to persons who are at medium to high risk of suicide. MHSA funds enable additional paid and volunteer staff capacity, most particularly in the hotline’s trained multi-lingual, multi-cultural response. 2) The County fields a mental health clinical specialist to augment the adult clinics for responding to those individuals identified as at risk for suicide. This clinician receives referrals from psychiatrists and clinicians of persons deemed to be at risk, and provides a short term intervention and support response, while assisting in connecting the person to more long term care. 3) A multi-disciplinary, multi-agency Suicide Prevention Committee has been established, and has published a countywide Suicide Prevention Strategic Plan. This ongoing committee oversees the implementation of the Plan by addressing the strategies outlined in the Plan. These strategies include i) creating a countywide system of suicide prevention, ii) increasing interagency coordination and collaboration, iii) implementing education and training opportunities to prevent suicide, iv) implementing evidence based practices to prevent suicide, and v) evaluating the effectiveness of the County’s suicide prevention efforts. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 753 b. The allocation for this category is summarized below: Plan Element Region Served Number to be Served Yearly Funds Allocated for FY 17-18 Contra Costa Crisis Center Countywide 25,000 301,636 County Clinician Countywide 50 133,742 County Supported Countywide N/A Included in PEI administrative cost Total 25,050 $435,378 PEI Administrative Support A Mental Health Program Supervisor position has been allocated by the County to provide administrative support and evaluation of programs and plan elements that are funded by MHSA. The allocation for this activity is summarized below: Plan Element Region Served Yearly Funds Allocated Administrative Support Countywide 146,154 Total $146,154 Prevention and Early Intervention (PEI) Summary for FY 2017-18 Outreach for Increasing Recognition of Early Signs of Mental Illness 1,035,575 Prevention 1,661,788 Early Intervention 2,377,280 Access and Linkage to Treatment 1,136,301 Improving Timely Access to Mental Health Services for Underserved Populations 1,580,477 Stigma and Discrimination Reduction 295,495 Suicide Prevention 435,378 Administrative Support 146,154 Total $8,668,448 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 754 Innovation Innovation is the component of the Three Year Program and Expenditure Plan that funds new or different patterns of service that contribute to informing the mental health system of care as to best or promising practices that can be subsequently added or incorporated into the system. Innovative projects for CCBHS are developed by an ongoing community program planning process that is sponsored by the Consolidated Planning Advisory Workgroup through its Innovation Committee. New Innovation Regulations went into effect in October 2015. As before, innovative projects accomplish one or more of the following objectives; i) increase access to underserved groups, ii) increase the quality of services, to include better outcomes, iii) promote interagency collaboration, and iv) increase access to services. While Innovation projects have always been time-limited, the Innovation Regulations have placed a five-year time limit on Innovation projects. During FYs 2015-16 and 16-17, CCBHS staff and stakeholders reviewed and ensured that all existing and emerging Innovation projects complied with the Innovation Regulations. Approved Programs The following programs have been approved, implemented, and funds have been allocated for Fiscal Year 2017-18: 1) Recovery Through Employment Readiness. The community program planning process has placed an urgent priority on the County providing pre-vocational and employment services to a large number of mental health consumers who are not currently receiving this service. An analysis indicates that Contra Costa Vocational Services currently partners with the California Department of Rehabilitation to provide a “place and train” model of employment services. This model screens applicant for readiness to enter competitive employment, and then provides job placement and supported employment services to facilitate job retention. However, a large number of individuals who need training, education and other pre-employment services are being screened out. A new and innovative model has been developed to combine a “train and place” approach with the existing “place and train” approach in order to serve a larger number of consumers who represent a broader spectrum of readiness for employment. Contra Costa Vocational Services partners with the Putnam Clubhouse to enable flexible funds to be made available for pre-employment goods and services. The Recovery Through Employment Readiness Project began in FY 2015-16. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 755 2) Coaching to Wellness. Individuals who have experience as a consumer and/or family member of the mental health system have been trained to provide mental health and health wellness coaching to recipients of integrated health and mental health services within CCBHS. These peer providers are part of the County’s Behavioral Health Services integration plans that are currently being implemented. Three Wellness Coaches are paired with two Wellness Nurses, and are assigned to the adult mental health clinics. The Coaches have received training specific to the skill sets needed to improve health and wellness outcomes for consumers. The Coaching to Wellness Project began implementation in FY 2015-16. 3) Partners in Aging. Older adults who are frail, homebound and suffer from mental health issues experience higher rates of isolation, psychiatric emergency interventions, and institutionalization that could be prevented. When fully implemented this project will field three field-based peer support workers to engage older adults who have been identified by their IMPACT clinicians, primary care providers, or Psychiatric Emergency Services as individuals who need additional staff care in order to avoid repeated crises, engage in ongoing mental health treatment, increase their skills in the activities of daily living, and engage appropriate resources and social networks. The Partners in Aging Project began implementation in FY 2016-17. 4) Overcoming Transportation Barriers. Transportation challenges provide a constant barrier to accessing mental health services. A comprehensive study was completed via the County’s community program planning process, and a number of needs and strategies were documented. Findings indicated a need for multiple strategies to be combined in a systemic and comprehensive manner. These strategies include training consumers to independently navigate public transportation, providing flexible resources to assist with transportation costs, educating consumers regarding schedules, costs and means of various modes of public transportation, and creating a centralized staff response to coordinate efforts and respond to emerging transportation needs. Three Peer Specialists address these needs and provide a means to inform the mental health system of care regarding solutions for improving transportation access to care. The Overcoming Transportation Barriers Project began implementation in FY 2016-17. The allocation for these projects are summarized below: Project County/Contract Region Served Number to be Served Yearly MHSA Funds Allocated for FY 17-18 Recovery Through Employment Readiness County Operated in partnership with Putnam Clubhouse Countywide 100 100,000 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 756 Coaching to Wellness County Operated Countywide 90 474,089 Partners in Aging County Operated Countywide 45 181,067 Overcoming Transportation Barriers County Operated Countywide 200 241,450 Administrative Support County Countywide Innovation Support 423,670 Total 435 $1,420,226 Emerging Programs The following concepts have been designated to be Innovation Projects, and are on track to be fully developed, approved and implemented during the period of this Three Year Plan: 1) Center for Recovery and Empowerment (CORE). CCBHS recognizes substance abuse/dependence in adolescence as it negatively affects physical, social, emotional and cognitive development. Early onset of alcohol or other drug use is one of the strongest predictors of later alcohol dependence. This is a priority because CCBHS does not have a coordinated system of care to provide treatment services to youths with addictions and co- occurring emotional disturbances. The CORE Project will be an intensive outpatient treatment program offering three levels of care; intensive, transitional and continuing care to adolescents dually diagnosed with substance use and mental health disorders. Services will be provided by a multi-disciplinary team, and will include individual, group and family therapy, and linkage to community services. 2) Cognitive Behavioral Social Skills Training (CBSST). Many consumers spend years residing at County augmented board and care facilities with little or no mental health treatment provided, and little or no functional improvement taking place. Often this lack of progress results in multiple admissions to the County’s Psychiatric Emergency Services and other, more costly, interventions. Cognitive Behavioral Social Skills Training (CBSST) is an emerging practice with demonstrated positive results for persons with severe and persistent mental illness. The CBSST Project proposes to apply this therapeutic practice to the population of individuals that have been placed in augmented board and care facilities. The CBSST Project will create a clinical team, consisting of a licensed clinician and peer support worker, to lead cognitive behavioral social skills training groups at board and care facilities. Adults with serious mental illness will learn and practice skills that will enable them to achieve and consolidate recovery based skills. The above concepts have been recommended by the Innovation Committee for development and submittal to the Mental Health Services Oversight and Accountability (MHSOAC) for June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 757 approval. Detailed project descriptions will be submitted to the MHSOAC for approval in a separate document. These concepts have been discussed by stakeholders in this year’s community program planning process, and are consistent with stakeholder identified priorities. The Mental Health Services Act states that five percent of MHSA funds will be for Innovation Projects. In order to meet this five percent requirement additional funds will be set aside for the emerging projects listed above. Innovation (INN) Component Yearly Program Budget Summary for FY 17-18 Projects Implemented 1,420,226 Funds allocated for emerging projects 700,000 Total $2,120,226 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 758 Workforce Education and Training Workforce Education and Training is the component of the Three Year Plan that provides education and training, workforce activities, to include career pathway development, and financial incentive programs for current and prospective CCBHS employees, contractor agency staff, and consumer and family members who volunteer their time to support the public mental health effort. The purpose of this component is to develop and maintain a diverse mental health workforce capable of providing consumer and family-driven services that are compassionate, culturally and linguistically responsive, and promote wellness, recovery and resilience across healthcare systems and community-based settings. The County’s Workforce, Education and Training Component Plan was developed and approved in May 2009, with subsequent yearly updates. The following represents funds and activities allocated in the categories of 1) Workforce Staffing Support, 2) Training and Technical Assistance, 3) Mental Health Career Pathway Programs, 4) Internship Programs, and 5) Financial Incentive Programs. Workforce Staffing Support 1) Workforce Education and Training Coordination. County staff are designated to develop and coordinate all aspects of this component. This includes conducting a workforce needs assessment, coordinating education and training activities, acting as an educational and training resource by participating in the Greater Bay Area Regional Partnership and state level workforce activities, providing staff support to County sponsored ongoing and ad-hoc workforce workgroups, developing and managing the budget for this component, applying for and maintaining the County’s mental health professional shortage designations, applying for workforce grants and requests for proposals, coordinating intern placements throughout the County, and managing the contracts with various training providers and community based organizations who implement the various workforce education and training activities. 2) Supporting Family Members. For the Three Year Plan a cadre of volunteers will be recruited, trained and supervised for the purpose of supporting family members and significant others of persons experiencing mental illness. Critical to successful treatment is the need for service providers to partner with family members and significant others of loved ones experiencing mental illness. Family members of consumers should be provided with assistance to enable them to become powerful natural supports in the recovery of their loved ones. Stakeholders continue to underscore the need to provide families and significant others with education and training, emotional support, and assistance with navigating the behavioral health system. Via a competitive Request for Qualifications process CCBHS will seek an organization to recruit, train and develop family members with lived experience to act as subject matter experts in a volunteer capacity to educate and support other family June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 759 members in understanding and best navigating and participating in the different systems of care. 3) Senior Peer Counseling Program. The Senior Peer Counseling Program within the Contra Costa Mental Health Older Adult Program recruits, trains and supports volunteer peer counselors to reach out to older adults at risk of developing mental illness by providing home visits and group support. Two clinical specialists support the efforts aimed at reaching Latina/o and Asian American seniors. The volunteers receive extensive training and consultation support. The MHSA funding allocation for this category is summarized below: Program/Plan Element County/Contract Region Served MHSA Funds Allocated for FY 17-18 WET Coordination County Operated Countywide 341,026 Supporting Families Contractor TBD Countywide 600,000 Senior Peer Counseling County Operated Countywide 287,914 Total $1,228,940 Training and Technical Support 1) Staff Training. Various individual and group staff trainings will be funded that support the values of the Mental Health Services Act. As a part of the MHSA community program planning process, staff development surveys, CCBHS’s Training Advisory Workgroup and Reducing Health Disparities Workgroup, stakeholders identified six staff training and training-related themes; 1) Client Culture, 2) Knowledge and Skills, 3) Management, 4) Orientation, 5) Career Development, and 6) Interventions/Evidence Based Practices. Within these themes a number of training topics were listed and prioritized for MHSA funding in the Three Year Plan. 2) NAMI Basics/Faith Net/Family to Family (De Familia a Familia). NAMI-Contra Costa will offer these evidence based NAMI educational training programs on a countywide basis to culturally diverse family members and care givers of individuals experiencing mental health challenges. These training programs are designed to support and increase family members’ knowledge of mental health issues, navigation of systems, coping skills, and connectivity with community resources that are responsive and understanding of the challenges and impact of mental illness on the entire family. 3) Crisis Intervention Training. CCBHS partners with the County’s Sherriff’s Department to provide three day Crisis Intervention Trainings twice a year for law enforcement officers so that they are better able to respond safely and compassionately to crisis situations involving persons with mental health issues. Officers learn from mental health professionals, experienced officers, consumers and family members who advise, problem-solve and support with verbal de-escalation skills, personal stories, and provide scenario-based training on responding to crises. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 760 4) Mental Health First Aid Instructor Training. CCBHS will be engaging the National Council to train staff to become instructors for Mental Health First Aid. These instructors will then provide Mental Health First Aid Training to community and faith based organizations and agencies who are often first responders to community trauma, violence or natural disaster. Mental Health First Aid is a proprietary evidence based in- person training for anyone who wants to learn about mental illness and addictions, including risk factors and warning signs. This eight hour training provides participants with a five step action plan to help a person in crisis connect with professional, peer, social, and self-help care. Participants are given the opportunity to practice their new skills and gain confidence in helping others who may be developing a mental health or substance use challenge, or those in distress. The staff instructors will be part of CCBHS’s Emergency Response Team, with liaison responsibilities to these first responder entities, should the Emergency Response Team be activated. The MHSA funding allocation for this category is summarized below: Plan Element County/Contract Region Served MHSA Funds Allocated for FY 17-18 Staff Training Various vendors Countywide 133,150 NAMI Basics/Faith Net/De Familia a Familia NAMI-Contra Costa Countywide 61,850 Crisis Intervention Training County Sherriff’s Department Countywide 15,000 Mental Health First Aid The National Council Countywide 20,000 Total $230,000 Mental Health Career Pathway Program The Service Provider Individualized Recovery Intensive Training (SPIRIT) is a college accredited recovery oriented, peer led classroom and experiential-based program for individuals with lived mental health experience as a consumer or a family member of a consumer. This classroom and internship experience leads to a certification for individuals who successfully complete the program, and is accepted as the minimum qualifications necessary for employment within CCBHS in the classification of Community Support Worker. Participants learn peer provider skills, group facilitation, Wellness Recovery Action Plan (WRAP) development, wellness self-management strategies and other skills needed to gain employment in peer provider and family partner positions in both county operated and community based organizations. The Office for Consumer Empowerment (OCE) offers this training annually, and supplements the class with a monthly peer support group for those individuals who are employed by the County in various peer and family partner roles. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 761 For the Three Year Plan the SPIRIT Program has been expanded to provide support and assistance with placement and advancement for SPIRIT graduates consistent with their career aspirations. The MHSA funding allocation for this category is summarized below: Program County/Contract Region Served Number to be Served Yearly MHSA Annual Funds Allocated SPIRIT OCE County Staff Contra Costa College Countywide 50 405,726 30,000 Total $435,726 Internship Programs CCBHS supports internship programs which place graduate level students in various county operated and community based organizations. Particular emphasis is put on the recruitment of individuals who are bilingual and/or bi-cultural, individuals with consumer and/or family member experience, and individuals who can reduce the disparity of race/ethnicity identification of staff with that of the population served. CCBHS provides funding to enable up to 75 graduate level students to participate in paid internships in both county operated and contract agencies that lead to licensure as a Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT), Licensed Clinical Social Worker (LCSW), Clinical Psychologist and Mental Health Nurse Practitioner. These County financed internships are in addition to the state level workforce education and training stipend programs that are funded by the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development. This state funded stipend program requires that participants commit to working in community public mental health upon graduation. The County’s assessment of workforce needs has determined that a combination of state and locally financed internships has enabled the County and its contractors to keep pace with the annual rate of turnover of licensed staff. The MHSA funding allocation for this category is summarized below: Program County/Contract Region Served Number to be Served Yearly MHSA Annual Funds Allocated Graduate Level Internships County Operated Countywide 245,000 Graduate Level Internships Contract Agencies Countywide 100,000 Total 75 $345,000 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 762 Financial Incentive Programs 1) MHLAP. CCBHS will participate in the state level workforce, education and training funded Mental Health Loan Assumption Program (MHLAP) until it sunsets in 2018. Administered by the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development, this program makes annual payments of up to $10,000 to an educational lending institution on behalf of an employee who has incurred debt while obtaining education. The recipient is required to work in the public mental health system for a year (up to five years) before a payment is made. 2) Loan Forgiveness Program. For the Three year Plan CCBHS will also implement a County funded Loan Forgiveness Program that specifically addresses critical psychiatry shortages, and provides potential career advancement opportunities for CCBHS Community Support Workers performing in the roles of peer provider and family partner. The recently completed Needs Assessment of workforce staffing shortages revealed that only 43% of authorized County psychiatrist positions were filled in FY 2015-16. Contracts for non-county psychiatrist time have been utilized to make up the shortage, but actual utilization falls significantly short of what is authorized. While all county mental health programs struggle to be competitive with the private sector for psychiatry time, Contra Costa’s pay for psychiatrists, both county and contract psychiatrists, significantly lags behind the pay provided by neighboring Bay Area county mental health programs. CCBHS will partner with the California Mental Health Services Authority (CalMHSA) to administer a loan forgiveness program patterned after the state level MHLAP, but differing in providing flexibility in the amount awarded each individual, and the County selecting the awardees based upon workforce need, such as psychiatrists. The MHSA funding allocation for this category is summarized below: Program County/Contract Region Served Number to be Served Yearly MHSA Funds Allocated for FY 2017-18 Loan Forgiveness CalMHSA Countywide To be determined 300,000 Total $300,000 Workforce Education and Training (WET) Component Budget Authorization for FY 2017-18: Workforce Staffing Support 1,228,940 Training and Technical Assistance 230,000 Mental Health Career Pathways 435,726 Internship Program 345,000 Loan Forgiveness Program 300,000 Total $2,539,666 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 763 Capital Facilities/Information Technology The Capital Facilities/Information Technology component of the Mental Health Services Act enables counties to utilize MHSA funds on a one-time basis for major infrastructure costs necessary to i) implement MHSA services and supports, and ii) generally improve support to the County’s community mental health service system. For the Three year Plan Contra Costa has one Information Technology Project in progress. Electronic Mental Health Record System. Contra Costa received approval from the State in 2010 to utilize up to $6 million in MHSA funds to develop and implement an electronic mental health record system. The approved project is intended to transform the current paper and location-based system with an electronic system where clinical documentation can be centralized and made accessible to all members of a consumer’s treatment team, with shared decision-making functionality. It would replace the existing claims system, where network providers and contract agencies would be part of the system and be able to exchange their clinical and billing information with the County. The proposed system would allow doctors to submit their pharmacy orders electronically, and permit sharing between psychiatrists and primary care physicians to allow knowledge of existing health conditions and drug inter- operability. It would also allow consumers to access part of their medical record, make appointments, and electronically communicate with their treatment providers. Subsequent to approval for this project Contra Costa Health Services, to include Contra Costa Regional Medical Center, the ambulatory care clinics and the Contra Costa Health Plan, converted existing systems to an integrated electronic medical record system, entitled EPIC. This conversion of the larger health care system initiated an analysis to determine the feasibility of using the EPIC system for behavioral health services. The analysis indicated significant functionality gaps in the clinical documentation and billing for specialty mental health services, as it utilized a different billing format. Closing the gap required significant development efforts by EPIC system staff. Initiation of the electronic mental health record system was delayed until EPIC was fully operational in Contra Costa’s Health Service Division, and functionality between EPIC’s capacity and the electronic mental health record’s objectives could be determined. This was solved by the certification of EPIC’s Tapestry module, and work began in FY 2013-14. The Epic Tapestry project will have the capacity to communicate and share information with EPIC and other systems currently in use by contract providers and other entities involved in the treatment and care of clients. The project is scheduled to be completed in two years. As per the 2010 proposal, funding from the County’s Health Services Department would be sought for any costs that exceed the originally approved $6 million. MHSA funds estimated to be available for FY 2017-18: $643,835 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 764 The Budget Previous chapters provide detailed projected budgets for individual MHSA plan elements, projects, programs, categories and components for FY 2017-18. The following table summarizes the total MHSA spending authority by component for each year of the Three Year Plan. CSS PEI INN WET CF/TN TOTAL FY 17/18 37,602,567 8,668,448 2,120,226 2,539,666 643,835 51,574,742 FY 18/19 36,772,145 8,926,161 2,159,833 2,602,956 52,299 50,513,394 FY 19/20 37,690,971 9,191,606 2,200,628 2,668,145 0 51,751,349 Appendix E, entitled Funding Summaries, provides a FY 2017-18 through FY 2019-20 Three Year Mental Health Services Act Expenditure Plan. This funding summary matches budget authority with projected revenues, and shows sufficient MHSA funds are available to fully fund all programs, projects and plan elements for the duration of the three year period. The following fund ledger depicts projected available funding versus total budget authority for each year of the Three Year Plan: Fiscal Year 2017/18 A. Estimated FY 2017/18 Available Funding CSS PEI INN WET CF/TN TOTAL 1.Estimated unspent funds from prior fiscal years 32,180,600 4,779,776 4,617,267 233,569 696,134 42,507,346 2. Estimated new FY 17/18 funding 34,873,771 7,943,443 2,090,380 0 0 44,907,594 3. Transfers in FY 17/18 (7,795,034) 7,795,034 4.Estimated available funding for FY 17/18 59,259,337 12,723,219 6,707,646 8,028,603 696,134 87,414,939 B.Budget Authority For FY17/18 37,602,567 8,668,448 2,120,226 2,539,666 643,835 51,574,742 C.Estimated FY 17/18 Unspent Fund Balance 21,656,770 4,054,771 4,587,420 5,488,937 53,299 35,840,197 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 765 Fiscal Year 2018/19 A.Estimated FY 2018/19 Available Funding CSS PEI INN WET CF/TN TOTAL 1.Estimated unspent funds from prior fiscal years 21,656,770 4,054,771 4,587,420 5,488,937 52,299 35,840,197 2. Estimated new FY 18/19 funding 34,405,520 8,076,380 2,125,363 0 0 45,607,263 3. Transfers in FY 18/19 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.Estimated available funding for FY 18/19 57,062,290 12,131,151 6,712,784 5,488,937 52,299 81,447,460 B.Budget Authority For FY18/19 36,772,145 8,926,161 2,159,833 2,602,956 52,299 50,513,394 C.Estimated FY 18/19 Unspent Fund Balance 20,290,145 3,304,990 4,552,951 2,885,981 0 30,934,066 Fiscal Year 2019/20 A.Estimated FY 2019/20 Available Funding CSS PEI INN WET CF/TN TOTAL 1.Estimated unspent funds from prior fiscal years 20,290,145 4,204,990 4,552,951 2,885,981 0 30,934,066 2. Estimated new FY 19/20 funding 35,405.520 8,076,380 2,125,363 0 0 45,607,263 3. Transfers in FY 19/20 0 0 0 0 0 0 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 766 4.Estimated available funding for FY 19/120 55,695,664 11,281,370 6,678,314 2,885,981 0 76,541,328 B.Budget Authority For FY19/20 36,690 9,191,606 2,200,628 2,668,145 0 51,751,349 C.Estimated FY 19/20 Unspent Fund Balance 18,004,693 2,089,764 4,477,686 217,836 0 24,789,979 Prudent Reserve: $7,125,250 Notes. 1. Estimated FY 2017/18 available funding for the CSS component includes $1,722,486 in funds received from the State in FY 16/17 for county administration of the Special Needs Housing Program (SNHP). Use of these funds are restricted to expenditures as allowed by this program. The one-time SNHP funding of $1,722,486 has been added to the FY 2017-18 budget. Any of these funds not spent during FY 2017-18 will be added to the FY 2018-19 budget when the Three Year Plan is updated in 2018. 2. The remaining CF/TN funds of $696,134 has been added to the FY 2017-18 budget. Any of these funds not spent for the Mental Health Electronic Records System in FY 2017-18 will be added to the FY 2018-19 budget when the Three Year Plan is updated in 2018. Any costs that are incurred above the total MHSA funds set aside for this project will be considered separately as a new and additional County funding obligation. 3. A collective increase in budget authority for programs, projects and plan elements for the second and third year of the Three Year Plan allows for an increase in the cost of doing business for both the County and service providers contracting with the County. Subsequent Three Year Plan Annual Update budget authority will be reviewed based upon recent actual costs and adjusted, if appropriate, for Board of Supervisor review and approval. 4. The Mental Health Services Act requires that 20% of the total of new funds received by the County from the State MHSA Trust Fund go for the PEI component. The balance of new funding is for the CSS component. From the total of CSS and PEI components, five percent of the total new funding is to go for the Innovation (INN) component, and is to be equally divided between the CSS and PEI allotment. The estimated new funding for each fiscal year includes this distribution. 5. Estimated new funding for each fiscal year includes the sum of the distribution from the State MHSA Trust Fund, interest earned from the County’s MHSA fund, and federal June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 767 financial reimbursement for qualified Medi-Cal expenditures utilizing MHSA funds as match, to include the EPSDT special fund sub-account. 6. The County may set aside up to 20% of the average amount of funds allocated to the County for the previous five years for the Workforce, Education and Training (WET) component, Capital Facilities, Information Technology (CF/TN) component, and a prudent reserve. For this three year period the County is allocating $7,565,790 for the WET component, and is depicted as a transfer from the CSS component in FY 2017-18. 7. The MHSA requires that counties set aside sufficient funds, entitled a prudent reserve, to ensure that services do not have to be significantly reduced in years in which revenues are below the average of previous years. The County’s prudent reserve balance through June 30, 2017 is estimated to be $7,125,250. This figure is in addition to the estimated available unspent funds from previous years. 8. It is projected that the requested total budget authority for the Three Year Plan period enables the County to fully fund all proposed programs and plan elements while maintaining sufficient funding reserves (prudent reserve plus unspent funds from previous years) to offset any reduction in state MHSA Trust Fund distribution or federal financial participation (Medi-Cal reimbursement). June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 768 Evaluating the Plan Contra Costa Behavioral Health Services is committed to evaluating the effective use of funds provided by the Mental Health Services Act. Toward this end a comprehensive program and fiscal review process has been implemented to a) improve the services and supports provided, b) more efficiently support the County’s MHSA Three Year Program and Expenditure Plan, and c) ensure compliance with statute, regulations and policies. During each three year period, each of the contract and county operated programs and plan elements receiving MHSA funds will undergo a program and fiscal review. This entails interviews and surveys of individuals both delivering and receiving services, review of data, case files, program and financial records, and performance history. Key areas of inquiry include: • Delivering services according to the values of the Mental Health Services Act. • Serving those who need the service. • Providing services for which funding was allocated. • Meeting the needs of the community and/or population. • Serving the number of individuals that have been agreed upon. • Achieving the outcomes that have been agreed upon. • Assuring quality of care. • Protecting confidential information. • Providing sufficient and appropriate staff for the program. • Having sufficient resources to deliver the services. • Following generally accepted accounting principles. • Maintaining documentation that supports agreed upon expenditures. • Charging reasonable administrative costs. • Maintaining required insurance policies. • Communicating effectively with community partners. Each program or plan element receives a written report that addresses each of the above areas. Promising practices, opportunities for improvement, and/or areas of concern will be noted for sharing or follow-up activity, as appropriate. The emphasis will be to establish a culture of continuous improvement of service delivery, and quality feedback for future planning efforts. In addition, a monthly MHSA Financial Report is generated that depicts funds budgeted versus spent for each program and plan element included in this Plan. This enables ongoing fiscal accountability, as well as provides information with which to engage in sound planning. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 769 Acknowledgements We acknowledge that this document is not a description of how Contra Costa Behavioral Health Services has delivered on the promise provided by the Mental Health Services Act. It is, however, a plan for how the County can continually improve upon delivering on the promise. We have had the honor to meet many people who have overcome tremendous obstacles on their journey to recovery. They were quite open that the care they received literally saved their life. We also met people who were quite open and honest regarding where we need to improve. For these individuals, we thank you for sharing. We would also like to acknowledge those Contra Costa stakeholders, both volunteer and professional, who have devoted their time and energy over the years to actively and positively improve the quality and quantity of care that has made such a difference in people’s lives. They often have come from a place of frustration and anger with how they and their loved ones were not afforded the care that could have avoided unnecessary pain and suffering. They have instead chosen to model the kindness and care needed, while continually working as a team member to seek and implement better and more effective treatment programs and practices. For these individuals, we thank you, and feel privileged to be a part of your team. The MHSA Staff June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 770 (Page left intentionally blank) June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 771 Mental Health Service Maps Mental Health Services Act funded programs and plan elements are only a portion of the total funding that supports public mental health services provided by Contra Costa County employees and staff employed by contractors. The backbone of the CCMH system of care is its three county operated Children’s and three county operated Adult clinics that serve the Western, Central and Eastern regions of the county. The following six service maps provide a visual picture, or architecture, of the constellation of types of Contra Costa Mental Health’s programs, and thus enable the viewer to see the inclusion of MHSA funded services as part of the entire system of care. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 772 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 773 Central County Adult Mental Health Services Telecare Idylwood Convalescent Rainbow Community Center Concord Putnam Clubhouse Concord Jewish Family & Children’s Services Walnut Creek C.O.P.E. Family Support Center Concord Center for Human Development Pleasant Hill Crestwood MHRCs Canyon Manor California Psychiatric Transitions Countywide Long-term Care Providers (IMDs/MHRCs) County Inpatient: CCRMC – 4C Central County Adult Mental Health Clinic 1420 Willow Pass Rd., Concord Population Served: Adults & Older Adults, TAY Services: Assessments Case Management Psychiatric Services Crisis Intervention Housing Services Benefits Assistance Rapid Access Suicide Prevention Pilot Perinatal/Post-partum Depression Pilot Individual Therapy Therapy Groups Primary Care (Willow Pass Wellness Center) County Psychiatric Emergency Services Contra Costa Interfaith Housing Pleasant Hill La Clinica de la Raza Concord Child Abuse Prevention Council Concord Prevention & Early Intervention Programs George & Cynthia Miller Wellness Center Martinez Countywide Services Anka Behavioral Health Nierika House Crisis Residential Facility 1959 Solano Way, Concord Nevin House Transitional Residential Facility 3215/3221 Nevin Ave., Richmond Phoenix Center Medication Management 1470 Civic Court, Suite 1111 in Concord Conservatorship/Guardianship Consumer Self-Help Center Patients’ Rights Advocates Contra Costa Crisis Center Augmented Board and Care Homes CC’s Adult Residential Care Home Concord Concord Hill Concord God’s Grace Hayward Happy Home Concord Margarita’s Villa of Care Concord Modesto Residential System of Care – Regional Community Based Organizations ANKA Central FSP Concord Clayton Way TAY Transitional/ Independent Housing Fred Finch TAY FSP Rainbow Community Center Counseling Program 2118 Willow Pass Rd., Concord Youth Homes TAY FSP Provider Network YWCA Martinez Individual Providers (90 Adult and Children) Consumer-Driven Programs ANKA Multi Service Center 1121 Detroit Ave., Concord Recovery Innovations Consumer-Run Community Center 2975 Treat Blvd., Walnut Creek Contracted Psychiatric Hospitals John Muir Behavioral Health Concord Herrick Hospital Berkeley BHC Heritage Oaks Sacramento BHC Sierra Vista Sacramento St. Helena Hospital St. Helena St. Helena Hospital Vallejo Crestwood The Bridge Board & Care Our House Board & Care Pleasant Hill Manor Pleasant Hill Crestwood Pathways Transitional Residential Scenic View Martinez First-Hope Program PEI Woodhaven Home Concord Forensic Services Williams Board and Care Vallejo Hope House Crisis Residential Facility 300 Ilene St., Martinez Older Adult Services Senior Peer Counseling Impact ICM Transition Services Vocational Services A-3June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 774 Telecare Idylwood Convalescent East County Adult Mental Health Services Child Abuse Prevention Council Concord, service Countywide Rainbow Community Center Concord, service Countywide C.O.P.E. Family Support Center Concord, service Countywide Jewish Family & Children’s Services Walnut Creek, service Countywide Crestwood MHRCs Canyon Manor California Psychiatric Transitions Countywide Long- term Care Providers (IMDs/MHRCs) County Inpatient: CCRMC – 4C East County Adult Mental Health Clinics 2311 Loveridge Rd. Pittsburg, CA 94565 Population Served: Adults & Older Adults, TAY Services: Assessments Case Management Psychiatric Services Crisis Intervention Housing Services Benefits Assistance/Financial Counseling Rapid Access Money Management Vocational Services Individual Therapy Therapy Groups Primary Care (Pittsburg Health Center) County Psychiatric Emergency Services La Clinica de la Raza Pittsburg Contra Costa Interfaith Housing Pittsburg Center for Human Development Bay Point Prevention & Early Intervention Programs George & Cynthia Miller Wellness Center Martinez Countywide Services Anka Behavioral Health Nierika House Crisis Residential Facility 1959 Solano Way, Concord Nevin House Transitional Residential Facility 3215/3221 Nevin Ave., Richmond Phoenix Center Medication Management 1470 Civic Court, Suite 1111 in Concord Conservatorship/Guardianship Augmented Board and Care Homes Blessed Care Home Pittsburg Johnson Care Home Antioch Menona Drive Care Home Antioch Oak Hills Residential Facility Pittsburg System of Care – Regional Community Based Organizations Portia Bell Hume Behavioral Health and Training Center Adult FSP 555 School St., Pittsburg Youth Homes TAY FSP 2213 Buchanan Rd., Antioch Provider Network Amador Institute Antioch Psychotherapy Institute Antioch YWCA Antioch 50 Individual Providers (Adults and Children) Consumer-Driven Programs ANKA Shelter West 4th St., Antioch Recovery Innovations Consumer-Run Community Center 3701 Lone Tree Way, Antioch Contracted Psychiatric Hospitals John Muir Behavioral Health Concord Herrick Hospital Berkeley BHC Heritage Oaks Sacramento BHC Sierra Vista Sacramento Consumer Self-Help Center (Patients’ Rights Advocates) Paraiso Home Oakley St. Helena Hospital St. Helena Contra Costa Crisis Center Springhill Home Pittsburg St. Helena Hospital Vallejo Crestwood The Bridge Board & Care Our House Board & Care Crestwood Pathways Transitional Residential First-Hope Program PEI Forensic Services Hope House Crisis Residential Facility 300 Ilene St., Martinez Older Adult Services Senior Peer Counseling Impact ICM Transition Services Vocational Services A-4 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 775 Lifelong Medical Care Richmond West County Adult Mental Health Services C.O.P.E. Family Support Center Concord, service Countywide Rainbow Community Center Concord, service RYSE TAY Richmond Native American Health Center Richmond Telecare Idylwood Convalescent Crestwood MHRCs Canyon Manor California Psychiatric Transitions Countywide Long-term Care Providers (IMDs/MHRCs) County Inpatient: CCRMC – 4C West County Adult Mental Health Clinics 2523 El Portal Dr. #103, San Pablo Population Served: Adults & Older Adults, TAY Services: Assessments Case Management Psychiatric Services Crisis Intervention Housing Services Benefits Assistance Rapid Access Individual Therapy Therapy Groups Countywide Child Abuse Prevention Council Concord, service Countywide County Psychiatric Emergency Services The Latina Center Richmond Lao Family Community Development San Pablo Jewish Family and Children Services Walnut Creek, service Countywide Building Blocks for Kids Richmond Asian Family Services Richmond Prevention & Early Intervention Programs George & Cynthia Miller Wellness Center Martinez Countywide Services Anka Behavioral Health Nierika House Crisis Residential Facility 1959 Solano Way, Concord Nevin House Transitional Residential Facility 3215/3221 Nevin Ave., Richmond Phoenix Center Medication Management 1470 Civic Court, Suite 1111 in Concord Conservatorship/Guardianship Augmented Board and Care Homes Ducre’s Residential Care Richmond Family Courtyard Richmond God’s Grace Hayward Williams Board and Care Richmond System of Care – Regional Community Based Organizations Familias Unidas Adult FSP 205 39th Street, Richmond Fred Finch TAY FSP 2523 El Portal Dr., San Pablo Portia Bell Hume Center West County Adult FSP and Outpatient Richmond Provider Network Asian Community Mental Health Richmond 40 Individual Providers (Adults and Children) Consumer-Driven Programs ANKA Programs, Inc. Multi Service Center 1515 Market St., San Pablo Recovery Innovations Consumer-Run Community Center 256 24th St., Richmond Contracted Psychiatric Hospitals John Muir Behavioral Health Concord Herrick Hospital Berkeley BHC Heritage Oaks Sacramento BHC Sierra Vista Sacramento Consumer Self-Help Center Patients’ Rights Advocates Yvonne’s Home Care Richmond St. Helena Hospital St. Helena Contra Costa Crisis Center St. Helena Hospital Vallejo Crestwood The Bridge Board & Care Our House Board & Care Crestwood Pathways Transitional Residential First-Hope Program PEI Forensic Services Hope House Crisis Residential Facility 300 Ilene St., Martinez Older Adult Services Senior Peer Counseling Impact ICM Transition Services Vocational Services A-5 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 776 Central County Children’s Mental Health Services Central County Children’s Mental Health Clinic 2425 Bisso, Ste. 200 Concord, CA 94520 Population Served: Children and TAY Services: Psychiatric Services Outpatient Services Parent Partners Parent Project PIP Program Wrap Around Services Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Dialectical Behavior Therapy Trauma Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Triple P Parenting Family Based Therapy for Eating Disorders County Psychiatric Emergency Services George & Cynthia Wellness Center Martinez Countywide Services School-Based Program Unit System of Care – Community Based Organizations Provider Network Prevention & Early Intervention Programs Contracted Psychiatric Hospitals Children’s Specialty Programs 2425 Bisso Ln. #235 Concord Population Served: Children & TAY • Child & Family Mental Health Services • Social Services Child Assessment Unit • Spirit of Caring • Katie A. • Local and National Case Management Head Start Unbundled Day Treatment Uplift Youth Services Bureau Concord STAND! Concord Rainbow Community Organizational: YWCA Martinez 90 Individual Providers (Adults and Children) Center for Human Development Pleasant Hill Child Abuse Prevention Council Concord Contra Costa John Muir Behavioral Health Concord Herrick Hospital Berkeley COFY Multi-Systemic Therapy and Functional Family Therapy Consumer Self-Help Center Patients’ Rights Advocates County-Wide Assessment Team 2425 Bisso Ln. #235 Concord Population Served: Children & TAY First-Hope Program PEI Hospital & Residential Unit 2425 Bisso Ln. #280 Concord Population Served: Children & TAY • Hospital Liaison • Emergency Foster Care • TBS Services Coordination Mental Health and Probation Services 202 Glacier Dr. Martinez Population Served: Children & TAY • Juvenile Hall, Juvenile Assessment and Consultation Services • Orin Allen Youth Rehabilitation Facility • Regional Probation Liaisons Lincoln Child Center In-Home Behavioral Services Mount Diablo High School, Concord La Cheim Nonpublic School Antioch and El Sobrante, service Countywide Seneca Olivera Nonpublic School Concord Seneca Collaborative At: Pleasant Hill Middle School, Riverside MS (MDUSD) Outpatient School-wide Mental Health Services COFY Marchus School – Elementary and Middle (CCCOE) Fred Finch Elementary: Bel Air, Shore Acres, Wren Ave, Meadow Homes, Ygnacio Valley Middle: El Dorado, Oak Grove, Valley View High: Mt. Diablo, Ygnacio Valley, Concord Center Concord MDUSD Fair Oaks Wrap Clinic Concord Fred Finch CCTAY FSP San Pablo, serves West and Central Youth Homes TAY FSP Serves East and Central Interfaith Housing Pleasant Hill C.O.P.E. Family Support Center Concord La Clinica de la Raza Concord New Leaf Martinez Rainbow Community Center Concord STAND! Concord Contra Costa Crisis Center Walnut Creek Jewish Family and Children Services Walnut Creek BHC Heritage Oaks Sacramento BHC Sierra Vista Sacramento St. Helena Hospital - St. Helena St. Helena Hospital - Vallejo Lincoln Multi-Dimensional Family Therapy We Care 0-5 Mt. Diablo Unified School District Elementary Schools: Sunrise High Schools: Mt. Diablo, Olympic, Alliance Seneca Mobile Response Team STAND! Respite & Mentoring Start FSP Seneca TBS Providers COFY Seneca Youth Homes La Cheim ASPIRAnet Fred Finch Youth Center Milhouse Children’s Services St. Vincent’s School for Boys Victor Community Support Services Thunder Road (Integrated Adolescent SUD/MH Intensive Outpatient) Fred Finch - Avalon Dual-diagnoses residential treatment and nonpublic school A-6 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 777 East County Children’s Mental Health Services Antioch Children’s Behavioral Health 2335 Country Hills Drive Antioch, CA 94509 Population Served: Children and TAY Services: Head Start Program Psychiatric Services Outpatient Services Parent Partners Parent Project Wrap Around Services Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Dialectical Behavior Therapy Trauma Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Triple P Parenting Family Based Therapy for Eating Disorders County Psychiatric Emergency Services George & Cynthia Wellness Center Martinez Countywide Services School-Based Program Unit System of Care – Regional Community Based Organizations Provider Network Prevention & Early Intervention Programs Contracted Psychiatric Hospitals Children’s Specialty Programs 2425 Bisso Ln. #235 Concord Population Served: Children & TAY • Child & Family Mental Health Services • Social Services Child Assessment Unit • Spirit of Caring • Katie A. • Local and National Case Management COFY (Multi-Systemic Therapy and Functional Family Therapy) Consumer Self-Help Center (Patients’ Rights Advocates) County-Wide Assessment Team 2425 Bisso Ln. #235 Concord Population Served: Children & TAY First-Hope Program (PEI) Hospital & Residential Unit 2425 Bisso Ln. #280 Concord Population Served: Children & TAY • Local and National Case Management • Hospital Liaison • TBS Services Coordination Head Start Outpatient Services La Cheim At: Antioch Seneca Center At:Riverview Middle School (Mount Diablo Unified School District) Outpatient School-wide Mental Health Services Lincoln Pittsburg Unified School District Elementary, Middle, and High Schools Mental Health Enhanced Classroom(s) Community Health for Asian Americans Antioch La Clinica Oakley Youth Homes TAY FSP Antioch Child Therapy Institute Antioch Center for Psychotherapy Antioch Organizational: Amador Institute Antioch YWCA Antioch 50 Individual Providers (Adults and Children) Center for Human Development Bay Point Contra Costa Interfaith Housing Pittsburg La Clinica de la Raza Pittsburg People Who Care Pittsburg Rainbow Community Center Concord, service Countywide STAND! Antioch Child Abuse Prevention Council Concord, service Countywide Contra Costa Crisis Center Walnut Creek John Muir Behavioral Health Concord Herrick Hospital Berkeley BHC Heritage Oaks Sacramento BHC Sierra Vista Sacramento St. Helena Hospital - St. Helena St. Helena Hospital - Vallejo Mental Health and Probation Services 202 Glacier Dr. Martinez Population Served: Children & TAY • Juvenile Hall, Juvenile Assessment and Consultation Services • Orin Allen Youth Rehabilitation Facility • Regional Probation Liaisons Lincoln Elementary Schools: Foothill, Petite Academy Middle Schools: Black Diamond, Learning Academy Jewish Family and Children Services Walnut Creek, service Countywide Lincoln Child Center (In-Home Behavioral Services) Lincoln (Multi-Dimensional Family Therapy) We Care (0-5) Seneca (Mobile Response Team) STAND! (Respite & Mentoring) Start FSP Seneca TBS Providers COFY Seneca Youth Homes La Cheim ASPIRAnet Fred Finch Youth Center Milhouse Children’s Services St. Vincent’s School for Boys Victor Community Support Services Thunder Road (Integrated Adolescent SUD/MH Intensive Outpatient) Fred Finch - Avalon Dual-diagnoses residential treatment and nonpublic school A-7 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 778 West County Children’s Mental Health Services West County Children’s Mental Health Clinic 303 41st Street Richmond, CA Population Served: Children and TAY Services: Psychiatric Services Outpatient Services Parent Partners Wrap Around Services Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Dialectical Behavior Therapy Trauma Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Triple P Parenting NA/AA County Psychiatric Emergency Services George & Cynthia Wellness Center Martinez Countywide Services School-Based Program Unit System of Care – Regional Community Based Organizations Provider Network Prevention & Early Intervention Programs Contracted Psychiatric Hospitals Children’s Specialty Programs 2425 Bisso Ln. #235 Concord Population Served: Children & TAY • Child & Family Mental Health Services • Social Services Child Assessment Unit • Spirit of Caring • Katie A. • Local and National Case Management COFY (Multi-Systemic Therapy) Consumer Self-Help Center (Patients’ Rights Advocates) County-Wide Assessment Team 2425 Bisso Ln. #235 Concord Population Served: Children & TAY Head Start Unbundled Day Treatment La Cheim At: La Ceim School Richmond (NPS) Seneca At: Catalyst (WCCUSD) Outpatient School-wide Mental Health Services at WCCUSD Schools Alternative Family Services Richmond BACR Richmond Community Health for Asian Americans Richmond WCCUSD Wraparound Clinic WCCUSD Early Childhood Mental Health Richmond Organizational: Asian Community Mental Health Richmond Carrie McCluer & Associates Crocket 40 Individual Providers (Adults and Children) Building Blocks for Kids Richmond The James Morehouse Project El Cerrito The Latina Center Richmond Native American Health Center Richmond RYSE Richmond John Muir Behavioral Health Concord Herrick Hospital Berkeley BHC Heritage Oaks Sacramento BHC Sierra Vista Sacramento St. Helena Hospital - St. Helena First-Hope Program (PEI) Hospital & Residential Unit 2425 Bisso Ln. #280 Concord Population Served: Children & TAY • Local and National Case Management • Hospital Liaison • TBS Services Coordination Mental Health and Probation Services 202 Glacier Dr. Martinez Population Served: Children & TAY • Juvenile Hall, Juvenile Assessment and Consultation Services • Orin Allen Youth Rehabilitation Facility • Regional Probation Liaisons Lincoln Child Center (In-Home Behavioral Services) Lincoln (Multi-Dimensional Family Therapy) Bay Area Community Resources (BACR) Elementary Schools: Grant, Harbor Way, Lincoln, Nystrom, Peres, Martin Luther King, and Stege Middle Schools: Crespi, Pinole, Portola, Hercules High Schools: El Cerrito, Richmond, Pinole Valley, Hercules Community Health for Asian American Elementary Schools: Lincoln, Nystrom Middle Schools: Helms, LoVonya DeJean High Schools: El Cerrito, Kennedy, Richmond Seneca Elementary Schools: Highland, Sheldon, Tara Hills Middle Schools: Pinole, Transitional Learning Center (WCCUSD) Familias Unidas Richmond Fred Finch (TAY FSP) Richmond La Cheim Richmond Youth Services Bureau Richmond Child Therapy Institute El Cerrito STAND! Richmond Contra Costa Crisis Center Walnut Creek, service Countywide C.O.P.E. Family Support Center Concord, service Countywide Child Abuse Prevention Council Concord, service Countywide Rainbow Community Center Concord, service Countywide St. Helena Hospital - Vallejo We Care (0-5) Seneca (Mobile Response Team) Y Team Elementary School: Nystrom Middle School: Crespi, Helms, Portola, LoVonya DeJean High Schools: De Anza, El Cerrito, Kennedy, Richmond STAND! (Respite & Mentoring) Start FSP Seneca Youth Services Bureau Elementary Schools: Washington, Harbour Way, Transitional Learning Middle Schools: Crespi, Pinole, Portola, Hercules High School: El Cerrito, Richmond, Pinole Valley, Hercules TBS Providers COFY Seneca Youth Homes La Cheim ASPIRAnet Fred Finch Youth Center Milhouse Children’s Services St. Vincent’s School for Boys Victor Community Support Services Thunder Road (Integrated Adolescent SUD/MH Intensive Outpatient) Fred Finch - Avalon Dual-diagnoses residential treatment and nonpublic school A-8 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 779 Program and Plan Element Profiles Table of Contents Anka Behavioral Health, Inc. ...................................................................................................................... B-3 Asian Community Mental Health Services (ACMHS) ................................................................................. B-5 Building Blocks for Kids (BBK) .................................................................................................................... B-7 Center for Human Development (CHD) ..................................................................................................... B-9 Central County Adult Mental Health Clinic (Contra Costa Behavioral Health) ....................................... B-11 Central County Children’s Mental Health Clinic (Contra Costa Behavioral Health) ................................ B-14 Child Abuse Prevention Council (CAPC) ................................................................................................... B-15 Community Options for Families and Youth, Inc. .................................................................................... B-16 Community Violence Solutions ................................................................................................................ B-18 Contra Costa Crisis Center ....................................................................................................................... B-20 Contra Costa Interfaith Housing (CCIH) ................................................................................................... B-22 Counseling Options Parent Education (C.O.P.E.) ..................................................................................... B-24 Crestwood Behavioral Health, Inc. .......................................................................................................... B-26 Desarrollo Familiar, Inc. ........................................................................................................................... B-27 Divine’s Home .......................................................................................................................................... B-29 East County Adult Mental Health Clinic (Contra Costa Behavioral Health) ............................................. B-30 East County Children’s Mental Health Clinic (Contra Costa Behavioral Health) ..................................... B-32 First Five Contra Costa ............................................................................................................................. B-33 First Hope (Contra Costa Behavioral Health) ........................................................................................... B-34 Forensic Mental Health (Contra Costa Behavioral Health) ...................................................................... B-36 Fred Finch Youth Center .......................................................................................................................... B-38 George and Cynthia Miller Wellness Center (Contra Costa Behavioral Health) ..................................... B-40 James Morehouse Project at El Cerrito High, YMCA East Bay ................................................................. B-41 Jewish Family and Community Services East Bay (JFCS/ East Bay) .......................................................... B-43 Juvenile Justice System – Supporting Youth (Contra Costa Behavioral Health) ..................................... B-45 La Clinica de la Raza ................................................................................................................................. B-47 The Latina Center ..................................................................................................................................... B-49 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 780 LAO Family Community Development ..................................................................................................... B-50 Lifelong Medical Care............................................................................................................................... B-52 Lincoln Child Center ................................................................................................................................. B-54 LTP CarePro, Inc. (Pleasant Hill Manor) ................................................................................................... B-56 Mental Health Services Act Housing Services (Contra Costa Health, Housing, and Homeless) ............. B-57 Mental Health Systems, Inc. .................................................................................................................... B-59 Modesto Residential Living Center, LLC. .................................................................................................. B-61 Native American Health Center (NAHC) .................................................................................................. B-62 Oak Hills Residential Facility .................................................................................................................... B-64 Office for Consumer Empowerment (Contra Costa Behavioral Health) .................................................. B-65 Older Adult Mental Health (Contra Costa Behavioral Health) ................................................................. B-67 People Who Care (PWC) Children Association ........................................................................................ B-70 Portia Bell Hume Behavioral Health and Training Center ........................................................................ B-71 Primary Care Clinic Behavioral Health Support (Contra Costa Behavioral Health) ................................. B-75 Putman Clubhouse ................................................................................................................................... B-76 Rainbow Community Center (RCC) .......................................................................................................... B-78 RI International Inc. (formerly known as Recovery Innovations) ............................................................ B-81 Resource Development Associates .......................................................................................................... B-83 RYSE Center .............................................................................................................................................. B-85 Seneca Family of Agencies ....................................................................................................................... B-87 Shelter, Inc. .............................................................................................................................................. B-89 STAND! For Families Free of Violence ...................................................................................................... B-93 Telecare Corporation ............................................................................................................................... B-94 United Family Care, LLC (Family Courtyard) ............................................................................................ B-97 Vicente Martinez High School - Martinez Unified School District ........................................................... B-98 Vocational Services: Recovery through Employment Readiness ........................................................... B-100 West County Adult Mental Health Clinic (Contra Costa Behavioral Health) ......................................... B-102 West County Children’s Mental Health Clinic (Contra Costa Behavioral Health) ................................. B-103 Williams Board and Care ........................................................................................................................ B-104 Woodhaven ............................................................................................................................................ B-105 Youth Homes, Inc. .................................................................................................................................. B-106 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 781 Anka Behavioral Health, Inc. Point of Contact: Chris Withrow, Chief Executive Officer. Contact Information: 1850 Gateway Boulevard, Suite #900, Concord CA 94520, (925) 825–4700, cwithrow@ankabhi.org 1. General Description of the Organization Anka’s mission is to eliminate the impact of behavioral health problems for all people. Anka serves more than 15,000 individuals annually and employs nearly 1,000 professional, specialized staff members. Anka’s philosophy is to treat the whole person by fully integrating care of both mind and body, always using clinically- proven, psycho-social models designed to promote health and wellness while containing costs. 2. Program: Adult Full Service Partnership - CSS The Adult Full Service Partnership (FSP) joins the resources of Anka Behavioral Healthcare and Costa County Behavioral Health Services, and utilizes a modified assertive community treatment model. Anka’s FSP program includes collaborative services with the Contra Costa Adult Forensic Team to case manage consumers who are on Contra Costa County Probation. The program serves adults who reside in Contra Costa County, who have been charged with non-violent felonies or misdemeanors, and who experience a serious mental illness/serious emotional disturbance. Previously, the Contra Costa’s Behavioral Health Court directly provided referrals to Anka. a. Scope of Services: Services use an integrated multi-disciplinary team approach, based on a modified Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) model of care. Services include outreach and engagement, case management, outpatient mental health services, including services for individuals with co-occurring mental health and alcohol and other drug problems, crisis intervention, medication support, housing support, flexible funds, vocational services, educational services, and recreational and social activities. Anka staff are available to consumers on a 24/7 basis. b. Target Population: Adults between the ages of 26 to 59 in Central County who are diagnosed with a serious mental illness, are at or below 300% of the federally defined poverty level, and are uninsured or receive Medi-Cal benefits. c. Payment Limit: $791,751 d. Number served: In FY15/16 Anka Central FSP served 70 individuals. e. Outcomes: Below are the FY 15/16 outcomes for Anka Central FSP. • Increase in incidence of psychiatric crisis • Reduction of the incidence of restriction June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 782 Table 1. Pre- and post-enrollment utilization rates for 70 Anka Central FSP participants enrolled in the FSP program during FY 15-16 No. pre- No. post- Rate pre- Rate post- enrollment enrollment enrollment enrollment %change PES episodes 239 277 0.315 0.354 +12.3 Inpatient episodes 46 36 0.065 0.046 -29.2 Inpatient days 593 530 0.773 0.651 -15.7 * Data on service utilization were collected from the county’s internal billing system, PSP. To assess the effect of FSP enrollment on PES presentations and inpatient episodes, this methodology compares clients’ monthly rates of service utilization pre-enrollment to clients’ post-enrollment service utilization rates. Using PES usage as an example, the calculations used to assess pre- and post-enrollment utilization rates can be expressed as: (No. of PES episodes during pre- enrollment period)/ (No. of months in pre- enrollment period) =Pre-enrollment monthly PES utilization rate (No. of PES episodes during post-enrollment period)/ (No. of months in post- enrollment period) =Post-enrollment monthly PES utilization rate June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 783 Asian Community Mental Health Services (ACMHS) Point of Contact: Sun Karnsouvong Contact Information: Asian Family Resource Center (AFRC), 12240 San Pablo Ave, Richmond, Ca. Sunk@acmhs.org 1. General Description of the Organization ACMHS provides multicultural and multilingual services, empowering the most vulnerable members of our community to lead healthy, productive and contributing lives. 2. Program: Building Connections (Asian Family Resource Center) - PEI a. Scope of Services: Asian Family Resource Center (AFRC) a satellite site of Asian Community Mental Health Services (ACMHS) will provide comprehensive and culturally-sensitive, appropriate education and access to Mental Health Services for Asian and Pacific Islander (API) immigrant and refugee communities, especially the Southeast Asians and Chinese population of Contra Costa County. ACMHS will employ multilingual and multidisciplinary staff from the communities which they serve. Staff will provide the following scope of services. i. Outreach and Engagement Services: individual and/or community outreach and engagement to promote mental health awareness, educate community member on signs and symptoms of mental illness, provide mental health workshops, and promote mental health wellness through community events. Engage community member in various activities to screen and assess for mental illness and/or assist in navigating them into the service systems for appropriate interventions: community integration skills to reduce MH stressors, older adult care giving skills, basic financial management, survival English communication skills, basic life skills, health and safety education and computer education, structured group activities (on topics such as, coping with adolescents, housing issues, aid cut-off, domestic violence, criminal justice issues, health care and disability services), mental health education and awareness, and health/mental health system navigation. ACMHS, in collaboration with community based organizations, will participate in 3-5 mental health and wellness events to provide wellness and mental health outreach, engagement, and education to API immigrants and refugees in the Contra Costa County. ii. Individual Mental Health Consultation: this service will also be provided to those who are exhibiting signs of mental illness early in its manifestation, to assess needs, identify signs/symptoms of mental health crisis/trauma, provide linkages/referrals or assist in navigating them into the mental June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 784 health system in culturally responsive manner without stigma, and provide wellness support groups to prevent escalations in mental health symptoms or stressors, accessing essential community resources, and linkages/referral to mental health services. Peer Navigators will be utilized to support participants to access services in a cultural sensitive manner. These services will be provided for a period of less than one year unless psychosis is present. ACMHS will serve a minimum of 75 high risk and underserved Southeast Asian community members within a 12 month period, 25 of which will reside in East County with the balance in West and Central County. b. Target Population: Asian and Pacific Islanders immigrants and refugees (especially Chinese and Southeast Asian population) in Contra Costa County c. Payment Limit: $133,900 d. Number served: In FY 15/16: 50 high risk and underserved community members. e. Outcomes: • All program participants received system navigation support for mental health treatment, Medi-Cal benefits, and other essential benefits. • Most respondents to survey report increased knowledge of mental health resources and benefits available. • 85% respondents reported better linkage to community resources. • 80% respondents reported a reduction in mental health symptoms, while 91% reported having less stress in their life after completion of the program. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 785 Building Blocks for Kids (BBK) Point of Contact: Jennifer Lyle. Contact Information: 310 9th Street, Richmond, Ca 94804, (510) 232-5812 jlyle@bbk-richmond.org 1. General Description of the Organization Building Blocks for Kids Richmond Collaborative is a place-based initiative with the mission of supporting the healthy development and education of all children, and the self-sufficiency of all families, living in the BBK Collaborative zone located in downtown Richmond, California. The Collaborative consists of member residents, member organizations, and working groups that work toward community change in the area of wellness and health, education, and community engagement. 2. Program: Not Me Without Me (PEI) a. Scope of Services: Building Blocks for Kids Collaborative, a project of Tides Center, will provide diverse households in the Iron Triangle neighborhood of Richmond, CA with improved access to mental health education, and Mental Health support. This sixth year of the Not About Me Without Me prevention and early intervention work addresses MHSA’s PEI goal of providing Prevention services to increase recognition of early signs of mental illness, and intervening early in the onset of a mental illness. Accordingly, the goals of the proposed sixth year are three-fold: (1) Working with BBK Zone families to ensure that they are knowledgeable about and have access to a network of supportive and effective mental health information and services; (2) reduce risk for negative outcomes related to untreated mental illness for parents/primary caregivers and children whose risk of developing a serious mental illness is significantly higher than average including cumulative skills-based training opportunities on effective parenting approaches; and, (3)Train and support families to self-advocate and directly engage the services they need. This work represents an evolution in our Not About Me Without Me approach to service provision by working toward a coordinated, comprehensive system that will support families in not just addressing mental illness and recovering from traumatic experiences but will fortify them to create community change. This system will continue to put resident interests and concerns at the fore and additionally be characterized by a model that enables organizations to: work more effectively and responsively with underserved residents in the Richmond community; improve outcomes; reduce barriers to success; increase provider accountability, and create a truly collaborative and healing environment using strategies that are non-stigmatizing and non-discriminatory. b. Target Population: Children and families living in Central Richmond c. Payment Limit: $204,447 d. Number served: In FY 15/16: 538 Individuals (includes outreach and education events). June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 786 e. Outcomes: • Over the course of the 15/16 year, BBK worked with Richmond parents to present to foundations, organizations and city and county providers. • BBK held Sanctuary groups and parents who attend have consistently reported developing a plan for supporting mental wellness for themselves. • BBK partnered with COPE and Child Abuse Prevention Council to offer evidence based parenting classes. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 787 Center for Human Development (CHD) Point of Contact: David Carrillo Contact Information: 901 Sun Valley Blvd., Suite 220, Concord, CA 94520 (925) 349-7333, david@chd-prevention.org 1. General Description of the Organization Center for Human Development (CHD) is a community-based organization that offers a spectrum of Prevention and Wellness services for at-risk youth, individuals, families, and communities in the Bay Area. Since 1972 CHD has provided wellness programs and support aimed at empowering people and promoting positive growth. Volunteers work side-by-side with staff to deliver quality programs in schools, clinics, and community sites throughout Contra Costa as well as nearby counties. CHD is known for innovative programs and is committed to improving the quality of life in the communities it serves. 2. Program: African American Wellness Program and Youth Empowerment Program, PEI a. Scope of Services: The Center for Human Development will implement the African American Wellness Program (formerly African American Health Conductor Program) and between the four programs components will provide a minimum of 150 unduplicated individuals in Bay Point, Pittsburg, and surrounding communities with mental health resources. The purpose is to increase client emotional wellness; reduce client stress and isolation; and link African American clients, who are underserved due to poor identification of needs and lack of outreach and engagement to mental health services. Key activities include: outreach at community events, culturally appropriate education on mental health topics through Mind, Body, and Soul support groups and community health education workshops in accessible and non-stigmatizing settings, and navigation assistance for culturally appropriate mental health referrals as early in the onset as possible. The Center for Human Development will implement the Empowerment Program, a Youth Development project, that will provide a minimum of 80 unduplicated LGBTQ youth and their allies in Antioch, Pittsburg, and surrounding East County communities with strength-based educational support services that build on youths’ assets, raise awareness of mental health needs identification, and foster resiliency. Key activities will include: a) Three weekly educational support groups that will promote emotional health and well-being, increase positive identity and self-esteem, and reduce isolation through development of concrete life skills; b) one leadership group that will meet a minimum of twice a month to foster community involvement; and c). referral linkage to culturally appropriate mental health services providers in East County as early in the onset as possible. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 788 b. Target Population: Wellness Program: African American residents (East County) at risk of developing serious mental illness. Youth Empowerment Program: LGBTQ youth in East County c. Payment Limit: $136,990 d. Number served: In FY 15/16: 238 individuals were served in both programs combined. 159 in the African American (AA) Wellness Program and 79 in the Empowerment Program. e. Outcomes: iii. Wellness Program • Mind-Body-Soul support groups in Pittsburg and Bay Point throughout the year with topics such as “Depression and Stress”, “Maintaining Emotional Well Being”, “Guide to Vitamins and Minerals in Fresh Foods”, “Self-Care (Physical, Emotional, Mental and Spiritual)”. • Several community health / mental health workshops throughout the year. • 100% of the participants in the Mind-Body-Soul peer health education support groups reported and increased wellness (wellbeing) within fiscal year 2015/2016. • Participants in AA Wellness Program received navigational support for their service referral needs. iv. Empowerment Program • LGBTQ youth empowerment support groups at Pittsburg and throughout the year with topics such as: “Family and Peer Conflict,” “Challenges to Relationships,” “Community Violence and Loss,” “Queer History and Activism.” • 85% of the participants in the Empowerment Psycho-Educational Leadership support groups reported and increased sense of emotional health and well-being within fiscal year 2015-2016. • 100% of participants in Empowerment in need of counseling services were informed and referred to LGBTQ-sensitive resources available to youth. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 789 Central County Adult Mental Health Clinic (Contra Costa Behavioral Health) Point of Contact: Kennisha Johnson, Mental Health Program Manager Contact Information: 1420 Willow Pass Rd., Ste. 200, Concord, CA 94520, (925) 646-5480, Kennisha.Johnson@hsd.cccounty.us 1. General Description of the Organization The Behavioral Health Services Division of Contra Costa Health Services combines Mental Health, Alcohol & Other Drugs and Homeless Program into a single system of care. The Central Adult Mental Health Clinic operates within Contra Costa Mental Health’s Adult System of Care, and provides assessments, case management, psychiatric services, crisis intervention, housing services, and benefits assistance. Within the Adult Mental Health Clinic are the following MHSA funded programs and plan elements: 2. Plan Element: Adult Full Service Partnership Support - CSS Contra Costa Mental Health has dedicated clinical staff at each of the three adult mental health clinics to provide support, coordination and rapid access for full service partners to health and mental health clinic services as needed and appropriate. Rapid Access Clinicians offer drop-in screening and intake appointments to clients who have been discharged from the County Hospital or Psychiatric Emergency Services but who are not open to the county mental health system of care. Rapid Access Clinicians will then refer clients to appropriate services and, when possible, follow-up with clients to ensure a linkage to services was made. If a client meets eligibility criteria for Full Service Partnership services, the Rapid Access Clinician will seek approval to refer the client to Full Service Partnership services. Clinic management acts as the gatekeepers for the Full Service Partnership programs, authorizing referrals and discharges as well as providing clinical oversight to the regional Full Service Partnership programs. Full Service Partnership Liaisons provide support to the Full Service Partnership programs by assisting the programs with referrals and discharges, offering clinical expertise, and helping the programs to navigate the County systems of care. 3. Plan Element: Clinic Support - CSS General Systems Development strategies are programs or strategies that improve the larger mental health system of care. These programs and strategies expand and enhance the existing service structure to 1) assist consumers in obtaining benefits they are entitled to, educate consumers on how to maximize use of those benefits and manage resources, and 2) provide transportation support for consumers and families. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 790 a. Clinic Target Population: Adults aged 18 years and older who live in Central County, are diagnosed with a serious mental illness and are uninsured or receive Medi-Cal benefits. b. Total Number served by clinic: For FY 15-16: Approximately 3,325 Individuals. 4. Program: Suicide Prevention Pilot - PEI A Mental Health Clinical Specialist provides routine follow up care and linkage services for Central County clients who access Psychiatric Emergency Services and are at risk for suicide. In addition, the clinician provides comprehensive assessment as well as group and individual therapy for suicidal patients at Concord Adult Mental Health. This clinician also supports countywide efforts to bring awareness to Suicide Prevention by participating in the Suicide Prevention Committee, the LGBTI committee and the Training Advisory group. a. Target Population: Clients at risk of suicide. b. Total Budget: $123,493 c. Staff: 1 Full time equivalent d. Number Served:40+ e. Outcomes: • Decrease in Suicide Rate (among clients open to Concord Adult Mental Health) • Increase in Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Participation • Trained in QPR, and acts as a trainer to primary responders in the community 5. Program: Women Embracing Life and Learning (WELL) - INN WELL is a collaboration between Contra Costa Mental Health Services, Public Health Nursing and the Women Infant and Child (WIC) project. It is integrating perinatal/postpartum depression services into the services currently provided at the Central County WIC office. The target population consists of mothers who receive services from the Central County WIC office who screen positive for perinatal and/or post-partum depression. The goals of the project are to learn: 1) which elements of the collaboration are most/least effective and why; 2) if the collaboration leads to an increase in awareness about mental health services and a decrease in the mothers’ perception of stigma associated with depression; and 3) improved health outcomes for the women participating in the collaboration. a. Target Population: Low income mothers with perinatal/postpartum depression. b. Total Budget: $194,652 c. Staff: 2.62 Full time equivalent d. Number Served: For FY 15/16: 71 individuals June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 791 e. Outcomes: The WELL Project strives to accomplish the following outcomes: • A decrease in psychiatric symptoms • A decrease in mental health stigma • To determine if the program may have resulted in changes in the above outcomes, data for these outcomes will be compared before and after program participation. The baseline data will be derived from participants at enrollment, and the post data will be derived from participants at graduation or upon dropping out from the program. Data related to psychiatric symptoms will be obtained from the PHQ-9. Data related to mental health stigma will be obtained from a measurement tool that will be determined. 6. Program: Overcoming Transportation Barriers – INN The Overcoming Transportation Barriers program is a systematic approach to develop an effective consumer-driven transportation infrastructure that supports the entire mental health system of care. The goals of the project are as follows: 1) improve access to mental health services; 2) improve system navigation; 3) improve independent living and self-management skills among clients. a. Target Population: Consumers of all ages and families served by the County- operated mental health clinics, with potential to expand to community-based organizations. b. Budget: $314,830 c. Staff: 3.0 Full-time equivalent d. Number Served: Program began in FY 15/16. The expected case load is approximately 10-20 consumers per clinic for an approximately six month service duration period. e. Outcomes: Program will include indicators in areas such as: appointment adherence, perceived safety and barriers, resource utilization, as well as tracking of program activities and changes in policy and practices. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 792 Central County Children’s Mental Health Clinic (Contra Costa Behavioral Health) Point of Contact: Gerold Loenicker, Mental Health Program Manager Contact Information: 2425 Bisso, Ste. 200, Concord, CA 94520, (925) 521-5744 Gerold.Loenicker@hsd.cccounty.us 1. General Description of the Organization The Behavioral Health Services Division of Contra Costa Health Services combines Mental Health, Alcohol & Other Drugs and Homeless Program into a single system of care. The Central Children’s Mental Health Clinic operates within Contra Costa Mental Health’s Children’s System of Care, and provides psychiatric and outpatient services, family partners, and wraparound services. Within the Children’s Mental Health Clinic are the following MHSA funded plan elements: 2. Plan Element: Clinic Support - CSS General Systems Development strategies are programs or strategies that improve the larger mental health system of care. These programs and strategies expand and enhance the existing service structure to assist consumers in the following areas: • Family Partners and Wraparound Facilitation. The family partners assist families with advocacy, transportation assistance, navigation of the service system, and offer support in the home, community, and county service sites. Family partners support families with children of all ages who are receiving services in the children. Family partners are located in each of the regional clinics for children and adult services, and often participate on wraparound teams following the evidence-based model. • A Clinical Specialist in each regional clinic who provides technical assistance and oversight of evidence-based practices in the clinic. • Support for full service partners. a. Target Population: Children aged 17 years and younger, who live in Central County, are diagnosed with a serious emotional disturbance or serious mental illness, and are uninsured or receive Medi-Cal benefits. b. Number served by clinic: For FY 15/16: Approximately 1,283 Individuals. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 793 Child Abuse Prevention Council (CAPC) Point of Contact: Carol Carillo Contact Information: 2120 Diamond Blvd #120, Concord, CA 94520 capccarol@sbcglobal.net 1. General Description of the Organization The Child Abuse Prevention Council has worked for many years to prevent the maltreatment of children. Through providing education programs and support services, linking families to community resources, mentoring, and steering County- wide collaborative initiatives, CAPC has led Contra Costa County’s efforts to protect children. It continually evaluates its programs in order to provide the best possible support to the families of Contra Costa County. 2. Program: The Nurturing Parenting Program, PEI a. Scope of Services: The Child Abuse Prevention Council of Contra Costa will provide an evidence-based curriculum of culturally, linguistically, and developmentally appropriate, Spanish speaking families in East County, and Central County’s Monument Corridor. Four classes will be provided for 12-15 parents each session and approximately 15 children each session 0-12 years of age. The 22 week curriculum will immerse parents in ongoing training, free of charge, designed to build new skills and alter old behavioral patterns intended to strengthen families and support the healthy development of their children in their own neighborhoods. Developmental assessments and referral services will be provided to each family served in the program using strategies that are non- stigmatizing and non-discriminatory. Families will be provided with linkages to mental health and other services as appropriate. Providing the Nurturing Parenting Program in the Monument Corridor of Concord and the Brentwood First Five Center allows underserved parents and children access to mental health support in their own communities and in their primary language. b. Target Population: Latino children and their families in Central and East County. c. Payment Limit: $117,928 d. Number served: In FY 15/16: 68+ parents and children e. Outcomes: • Four 22 week classes in Central and East County serving parents and their children. • All parent participants completed pre- and post-tests. All parents improved their scores on at least four out of five ‘parenting constructs’ (appropriate expectations, empathy, discipline, self-awareness, and empowerment). June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 794 Community Options for Families and Youth, Inc. Point of Contact: David Bergesen Contact Information: 3478 Buskirk Avenue, Suite 260, Pleasant Hill CA 94523, (925) 943-1794, d.bergesen@cofy.org 1. General Description of the Organization Community Options for Families and Youth (COFY) is a multi-disciplinary provider of mental health services. COFY’s mission is to work with youth whose high-intensity behaviors place them at risk of hospitalization or residential treatment. Their mental health clinicians work collaboratively with caregivers, educators, and social service professionals to help exasperated families restore empathic relationships and maintain placement for their children. 2. Program: Multisystemic Therapy (MST) – Full Service Partnership (FSP) - CSS Multisystemic Therapy (“MST”) in an intensive family and community based treatment that addresses the multiple determinants of serious anti-social behavior. The MST approach views individuals as being surrounded by a network of interconnected systems that encompasses individual, family, and extra familial (peers, school, community) factors. Intervention may be necessary in any one or a combination of these systems, and using the strengths of each system to facilitate positive change. The intervention strives to promote behavioral change in the youth’s natural environment. Family sessions are provided over a three to five month period. These sessions are based on nationally recognized evidence based practices designed to decrease rates of anti-social behavior, improve school performance and interpersonal skills, and reduce out-of-home placements. The ultimate goal is to empower families to build a healthier environment through the mobilization of existing child, family, and community resources. a. Scope of Services: Services include but are not limited to outreach and engagement, case management, outpatient mental health services, crisis intervention, collateral services, flexible funds. COFY MST staff must be available to consumer on a 24/7 basis. b. Target Population: Children 12 to 17 who have a serious emotional disturbance or serious mental illness, and have been identified as a juvenile offender or are at risk of involvement with Probation due to delinquent behavior. Services are county-wide. c. Payment Limit: for FY 2015-2016 MHSA portion: $650,000 d. Number served: In FY15/16 COFY FSP served 91 individuals. e. Outcomes: For clients served in 2015: Percent of clients with no new arrests: 71.43%, living in the home: 80.95%, and working or in school: 80.95% June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 795 Table 2. Pre- and post-enrollment utilization rates for 91 Community Options for Families and Youth, Inc. participants enrolled in the FSP program during FY 15-16 No. pre- No. post- Rate pre- Rate post- %change enrollment enrollment enrollment enrollment PES episodes 15 9 0.017 0.011 -35.2 Inpatient episodes 3 1 0.002 0.001 -50 Inpatient days 14 7 0.012 0.012 0 JACS 20 19 0.029 0.028 -3.44 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 796 Community Violence Solutions Point of Contact: Cynthia Peterson, Executive Director Contact Information: 2101 Van Ness Street, San Pablo, CA 94806, (510) 307-4121, cpeterson@cvsolutions.org 1. General Description of the Organization Community Violence Solutions (CVS) is dedicated to working in partnership with the community to end sexual assault and family violence through prevention, crisis services, and treatment. Formerly called Rape Crisis Center, CVS was founded by the Greater Richmond Interfaith Program in 1974. Since then, CVS has expanded its services to all of Contra Costa and Marin Counties. 2. Program: Reluctant to Rescue (Innovation) The intent of this project is to “increase the quality of services, including better outcomes”. Community Violence Solutions (CVS) named the project “Reluctant to Rescue” because it recognized the highly complex dynamic situations that often prevent the “rescue” of youth victimized by sexual exploitation. Through this project, CVS is exploring the effectiveness of various service modalities by addressing two of its operating assumptions. First, commercially sexually exploited (CSEC) youth are nearly always traumatized sexual assault victims; yet, exploited youth do not always see themselves as victims and, as a result, often do not respond to the same approaches as other sexual assault victims. Interventions might be more effective if they: a) assisted youth in recognizing the physical risks and health problems associated with the sex trade and b) addressed the youth’s ability to earn a living through paid job training. Addressing trauma and other psychosocial issues may need to occur later in the intervention. Second, the ways and reasons youth enter a situation of exploitation are often not same reasons they remain in this “work”. Therefore, interventions should address these changes. Staff adapts their outreach to engage youth where they are located, providing safe, accessible drop-in centers, and providing mental health and support services. This project is developing promising practices to identify exploited and at-risk youth, coordinate with and educate public entities, such as law enforcement, and mobilize resources to assist youth leave exploited situations. a. Scope of Services: The project recognizes youth as experts in their own experiences and relies on their feedback and expressions of need to inform the development of services and multiple service routes. Accordingly, the project initially approaches the issue of sex for pay with respectful inquiry instead of specific ideas of intervention and service. Youth share information through guided interviews and focus groups. The proposed project seeks to gain detailed information directly from the youth in order to help develop interventions that address complex motivations for entering and continuing in sexual exploitation. CVS utilizes the youth-generated information to inform curriculum June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 797 development and intensive training with a core group of CSEC parents, guardians, and foster parents who are open to increasing their skills and willing to care for these challenging and challenged youth. CVS coordinates all aspects of the project and, as appropriate, brings community partners in to deliver specific services requested by youth. Two drop-in centers are staffed and respond to needs of youth expressed in the qualitative data collected during Phase I of the project. CVS contracts with specific individuals and/or other agency providers to serve identified needs. b. Target Population: Sexually exploited youth (ages 16 to 25 years) and youth at risk of sexual exploitation. c. Annual Payment Limit: $126,000 d. Number served: For FY 15/16: 110 youth e. Outcomes: • Reduction in incidence of incarceration • Reduction in depression symptoms Community Violence Solutions collected baseline data using the Children and Adolescent Needs and Strengths Assessment (CANS) in FY 12/13; however, due to the transient nature of the target population, in FY 14/15 it was determined that the CANS is not the appropriate screening tool to use. The agency developed a new outcome measurement tool and outcomes will be included in fiscal year 16/17. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 798 Contra Costa Crisis Center Point of Contact: Rhonda James Contact Information: P.O. Box 3364 Walnut Creek, CA 94598 925 939-1916 RhondaJ@crisis-center.org 1. General Description of the Organization The mission of the Contra Costa Crisis Center is to keep people alive and safe, help them through crises, and connect them with culturally relevant resources in the community 2. Program: Suicide Prevention Crisis Line a. Scope of Services: • Contra Costa Crisis Center will provide services to prevent suicides throughout Contra Costa County by operating a nationally certified 24-hour suicide prevention hotline. The hotline lowers the risk of suicide by assuring 24 hour access to real time services rendered by a trained crisis counselor who not only assesses suicide and self-harm lethality and provides intervention, but links callers to numerous mental health treatment options. This linkage occurs via referral to culturally relevant mental health services as well as provides REAL TIME warm transfer to those services when appropriate. Because the hotline operates continuously regardless of time or day, all callers receive timely intervention and access to service WHEN THEY NEED IT and immediately upon their request. The Crisis Center’s programs are implemented (including agency program and hiring policies, bylaws, etc.) in a welcoming and intentionally non-discriminatory manner. Much of our outreach activities and staff/volunteer training activities center around increased awareness of myriad mental health issues as well as mental health services consumer stigma reduction in effort to increase community comfort at accessing services and in referring those in need. • Key activities include: answering local calls to toll-free suicide hotlines, including a Spanish-language hotline; the Crisis Center will maintain an abandonment rate at or below national standard; assisting callers whose primary language other than English or Spanish through use of a tele- interpreter service; conducting a lethality assessment on each crisis call consistent with national standards; making follow-up calls to persons (with their consent) who are at medium to high risk of suicide with the goal of 99% one-month follow up survival rate; and training all crisis line staff and volunteers in a consistent and appropriate model consistent with AAS (American Association of Suicidology) certification. As a result of these service activities >99% of people who call the crisis line and are assessed to be at medium to high risk of suicide will be survivors one month later; the June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 799 Crisis Center will continuously recruit and train crisis line volunteers to a minimum pool of 25 multilingual/culturally competent individuals within the contract year; Spanish-speaking counselors will be provided 80 hours per week. • The Crisis Center will provide community outreach and education about how to access crisis services. Priority and vigorous outreach efforts are directed to underserved and hard to reach populations such as youth, elderly, isolated, persons with limited English, LGBQT, etc. and focus changes as community needs emerge and are identified. • The Crisis Center will liaison with the County Coroner to provide referrals for grieving survivors (and mitigating contagion) and for culling statistical data on deaths ruled as suicide or undetermined (as well as homicides or accidents with possibility of suicidal activity by decedent). • In Partnership with County Mental Health, the Contra Costa Crisis Center will co-chair the Countywide Suicide Prevention Committee. b. Target Population: Contra Costa County residents in crisis. c. Payment Limit: $301,636 d. Number served: In FY 15/16: 25,605 crisis calls were fielded. e. Outcomes: • Calls were answered in both English and Spanish 12 hours each day and in English with Spanish tele-interpreter back up during late night/early morning hours 8 hours per day. • Average response time was 5 seconds and call abandonment rate was 1.9 (losing less than half of industry standard number of calls). • Lethality assessments were provided for 100% of callers rated mid to high level risk. • Delivered 14 Suicide Prevention presentations. • New volunteers trained and maintained pool of 40+ volunteers. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 800 Contra Costa Interfaith Housing (CCIH) Point of Contact: Sara Marsh Contact Information: 399 Taylor Blvd. Ste. 115, Pleasant Hill, CA 94530 (925) 944-2244, Sara@ccinterfaithhousing.org 1. General Description of the Organization Contra Costa Interfaith Housing (CCIH) provides permanent, affordable housing and vital, on-site support services to homeless and at-risk families and individuals in Contra Costa County. By providing services on-site at the housing programs where individuals and families live, we maximize timeliness and access to services. This model also minimizes the discriminatory barriers to support, due to lack of transportation or other resources. 2. Program: Strengthening Vulnerable Families a. Scope of Services: • Contra Costa Interfaith Housing, Inc. (CCIH) will provide an array of on-site, on-demand, culturally appropriate and evidence-based approaches for its “Strengthening Vulnerable Families” program, which serves formerly homeless families and families at risk for homelessness and for mental illness. CCIH provides services on-site in affordable housing settings and case managers are available fulltime to residents. This structure helps to eliminate barriers to timely access to services. Culturally aware youth enrichment and case management providers assist youth and families to access a multitude of community services, including mental health treatment. By incorporating these services among general support, potential stigma related to mental health referrals is reduced. By providing services to all residents, potential biased or discriminatory service delivery is avoided. • At Garden Park Apartments in Pleasant Hill, on-site services are delivered to 28 formerly homeless families. Programming at this site is designed to improve parenting skills, child and adult life skills, and family communication skills. Program elements help families stabilize, parents achieve the highest level of self-sufficiency possible, and provide early intervention for the youth in these families who are at risk for ongoing problems due to mental illness, domestic violence, substance addiction, poverty and inadequate life skills. Key activities include: case management, family support, harm reduction support, academic 4-day-per-week homework club, early childhood programming, teen support group, and community-building events. • CCIH will also provide an Afterschool Program and mental health and case management services at two sites in East Contra Costa County: Bella Monte Apartments in Bay Point and Los Medanos Village in Pittsburg. These complexes offer permanent affordable housing to low-income families at risk for homelessness. The total number of households being offered services June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 801 that are covered under this grant will be 155. Anticipated impact for services at these sites will be improved school performance by the youth and improved parenting skills and mental health for these families due to lowered stress regarding their housing status (eviction prevention) and increased access to resources and benefits. Increased recognition of early signs of mental illness will be achieved as well, due to the on-site case management staff’s ability to respond to possible family concerns about family members’ mental health, as they arise. • CCIH staff is also able to help community providers be aware of early signs of mental illness in their clients, and support sensitive care and timely treatment for these issues. b. Target Population: Formerly homeless/at-risk families and youth. c. Payment Limit: $66,462 d. Number served: FY 15/16: 275 e. Outcomes: • Improved school functioning and regular attendance of school-aged youth in afterschool programs. • Improved family functioning and confidence as measured by the self- sufficiency matrix (SSM) and individual family goals and eviction prevention. (SSM evaluates 20 life skill areas including mental health, physical health, child custody, employment, housing stability). June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 802 Counseling Options Parent Education (C.O.P.E.) Point of Contact: Cathy Botello Contact Information: 2280 Diamond Blvd #460, Concord, Ca 94520. (925) 689-5811 cathy.botello@copefamilysupport.org 1. General Description of the Organization C.O.P.E.’s mission is to prevent child abuse, by providing comprehensive services in order to strengthen family relationships and bonds, empower parents, encourage healthy relationships, and cultivate nurturing family units to encourage an optimal environment for the healthy growth and development of parents and children through parent education. 2. Programs: Triple P Positive Parenting Education and Support (PEI) a. Scope of Services: In partnership with First 5 Contra Costa Children, Family Commission and County Behavioral Health, C.O.P.E. is funded to deliver Positive Parenting Program classes to parent of children age 0 – 17. The C.O.P.E Family Support Center (Contractor) will provide approximately 21 services using the evidence- based Triple P — Positive Parenting Program Level 2 Seminar, Level 3 Primary Care, Level 4 Group, Level 5 Pathways, Level 5 Enhanced, Level 5 Transitions, Level 5 Lifestyles Multi-Family Support Groups, at no cost to parents of children two years to seventeen years of age. The program utilizes a self-regulatory model that focuses on strengthening the positive attachment between parents and children by helping parents to develop effective skills to manage common child behavioral issues. Our targeted population includes caregivers residing in underserved communities throughout Contra Costa County. All classes are available in Spanish and/or English and level 4 is available in Arabic and Farsi. In regards to the curriculum on Triple P Parenting, C.O.P.E. provides management briefings, orientation and community awareness meetings to partner agencies. They support and organize trainings, including pre- accreditation trainings, fidelity oversight and clinical and peer support in an effort to build and maintain a pool of Triple P practitioners b. Target Population: Contra Costa County parents of children and youth with identified special needs. c. Payment Limit: $231,750(6 – 17), through First Five: $77,250 (0 – 5). d. Number served: For FY 15/16: 230 (6 – 17) and 241 (0 – 5). June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 803 e. Outcomes: • Completed 28 parent education classes of for various levels of parenting problems. • Pre and Post Test show improvements in measures of parenting style (laxness, over-reactivity, and hostility), decrease of depression/anxiety measures, and decrease in frequency of child problem behavior, improvement in child adjustment behavior and caregivers level of stress about these behaviors. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 804 Crestwood Behavioral Health, Inc. Point of Contact: Travis Curran, Campus Administrator for Pleasant Hill campus. Contact Information: 550 Patterson Boulevard, Pleasant Hill, CA 94523. (925) 938-8050, tcurran@cbhi.net 1. General Description of the Organization The mission at Crestwood Healing Center is to partner with Contra Costa County clients, employees, families, business associates, and the broader community in serving individuals affected by mental health issues. Together, they enhance quality of life, social interaction, community involvement and empowerment of mental health clients toward the goal of creating a fulfilling life. Clients are assisted and encouraged to develop life skills, participate in community based activities, repair or enhance primary relationships, and enjoy leisure activities. A supportive, compassionate, and inclusive program increases motivation and commitment. 2. Program: The Pathway Program (Mental Health Housing Services – CSS) The Pathway Program provides psychosocial rehabilitation for 16 clients who have had little, if any, previous mental health treatment. The program provides intensive skills training to promote independent living. Many clients complete their high school requirements, enroll in college or are participating in competitive employment by the end of treatment. a. Scope of Services • Case management. • Mental health services. • Medication management. • Crisis intervention. • Adult residential. b. Target Population: Adults aged 18 years and older, who live in Central County, are diagnosed with a serious mental illness and are uninsured or receive Medi- Cal benefits. c. Annual MHSA Payment Limit: $ 885,960 d. Number served: For FY 15/16: 16 beds available at Pathways in Pleasant Hill. 64 beds available at The Bridge in Pleasant Hill. 30 beds available at Our House in Vallejo. e. Outcomes: To be determined. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 805 Desarrollo Familiar, Inc. (Familias Unidas) Point of Contact: Lorena Huerta, Executive Director. Contact Information: 205 39th Street, Richmond, CA 94805 (510) 412–5930, LHuerta@Familias-Unidas.org. 1. General Description of the Organization Familias Unidas exists to improve wellness and self-sufficiency in Latino and other communities. The agency accomplishes this by delivering quality mental health counseling, service advocacy, and information/referral services. Familias Unidas programs include: mental health, education and prevention, youth development, and wrap-around services. 2. Program: Familias Unidas – Full Service Partnership - CSS Familias Unidas provides a comprehensive range of services and supports in Contra Costa County to adults with serious emotional disturbance/serious mental illness who are homeless or at serious risk of homelessness. Services are based in West Contra Costa County. a. Scope of Services • Services are provided using an integrated team approach, based on a modified Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) model of care. Services include: • Outreach and engagement • Case management • Outpatient Mental Health Services, including services for individuals with co- occurring mental health & alcohol and other drug problems • Crisis Intervention • Collateral services • Medication support (may be provided by County Physician) • Housing support • Flexible funds • Contractor must be available to the consumer on a 24/7 basis b. Target Population: Adults between the ages of 26 and 59 in West County, who are diagnosed with a serious mental illness, are homeless or at imminent risk of homelessness, are at or below 300% of the federally defined poverty level, and are uninsured or receive Medi-Cal benefits. c. Payment Limit: $ 213,395 (this includes Federal Financial Participation, FFP) d. Number served: For FY 15/16: 32 Individuals e. Outcomes: For FY 15/16: • Reduction in incidence of psychiatric crisis • Reduction of the incidence of restriction June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 806 Table 3. Pre-and post-enrollment utilization rates for 32 Familias Unidas (Desarrollo Familiar, Inc.) FSP Participants enrolled in the FSP program during FY 15-16 No. pre- No. post- Rate pre- Rate post- % change Enrollment enrollment enrollment enrollment PES episodes 12 13 0.039 0.033 -15.3 Inpatient episodes 1 2 0.005 0.005 0 Inpatient days 5 6 0.026 0.015 -42.3 * Data on service utilization were collected from the county’s internal billing system, PSP. To assess the effect of FSP enrollment on PES presentations and inpatient episodes, this methodology compares clients’ monthly rates of service utilization pre-enrollment to clients’ post-enrollment service utilization rates. Using PES usage as an example, the calculations used to assess pre- and post-enrollment utilization rates can be expressed as: (No. of PES episodes during pre- enrollment period)/ (No. of months in pre- enrollment period) =Pre-enrollment monthly PES utilization rate (No. of PES episodes during post-enrollment period)/ (No. of months in post- enrollment period) =Post-enrollment monthly PES utilization rate June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 807 Divine’s Home Point of Contact: Maria Riformo. Contact Information: 2430 Bancroft Lane, San Pablo, CA 94806. (510) 222-4109, HHailey194@aol.com 1. General Description of the Organization The County contracts with Divine’s Home, a licensed board and care operator, to provide additional staff care to enable those with serious mental illness to avoid institutionalization and enable them to live in the community. 2. Program: Augmented Board and Cares – MHSA Housing Services - CSS a. Scope of Services Augmented residential services, including but not limited to: • medication management • nutritional meal planning • assistance with laundry • transportation to psychiatric and medical appointments • improving socialization • assist with activities of daily living (i.e., grooming, hygiene, etc.) • encouraging meaningful activity • other services as needed for individual residents b. Target Population: Adults aged 60 years and older, who live in West County, are diagnosed with a serious mental illness and are uninsured or receive Medi-Cal benefits. c. Annual MHSA Payment Limit: $ 5,184.00 d. Number served: For FY 15/16: 6 beds available. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 808 East County Adult Mental Health Clinic (Contra Costa Behavioral Health) Point of Contact: Beverly Fuhrman, Program Manager Contact Information: 2311 Loveridge Rd., Pittsburg, CA 94565, (925) 431-2621, Beverly.Fuhrman@hsd.cccounty.us 1. General Description of the Organization The Behavioral Health Services Division of Contra Costa Health Services combines Mental Health, Alcohol & Other Drugs and Homeless Program into a single system of care. The East Adult Mental Health Clinic operates within Contra Costa Mental Health’s Adult System of Care, and provides assessments, case management, psychiatric services, crisis intervention, housing services, and benefits assistance. Within the Adult Mental Health Clinic are the following MHSA funded programs and plan elements: 2. Plan Element: Adult Full Service Partnership Support - CSS Contra Costa Mental Health has dedicated clinicians at each of the three adult mental health clinics to provide support, coordination and rapid access for full service partners to health and mental health clinic services as needed and appropriate. Rapid Access Clinicians offer drop-in screening and intake appointments to clients who have been discharged from the County Hospital or Psychiatric Emergency Services but who are not open to the county mental health system of care. Rapid Access Clinicians will then refer clients to appropriate services and, when possible, follow-up with clients to ensure a linkage to services was made. If a client meets eligibility criteria for Full Service Partnership services, the Rapid Access Clinician will seek approval to refer the client to Full Service Partnership services. Clinic management act as the gatekeepers for the Full Service Partnership programs, authorizing referrals and discharges as well as providing clinical oversight to the regional Full Service Partnership programs. Full Service Partnership Liaisons provide support to the Full Service Partnership programs by assisting the programs with referrals and discharges, offering clinical expertise, and helping the programs to navigate the County systems of care. 3. Plan Element: Clinic Support - CSS General Systems Development strategies are programs or strategies that improve the larger mental health system of care. These programs and strategies expand and enhance the existing service structure to assist consumers in 1) obtaining benefits they entitled to, educate consumers on how to maximize use of those benefits and manage resources, and 2) provide transportation support for consumers and families. a. Clinic Target Population: Adults aged 18 years and older, who live in East County, are diagnosed with a serious mental illness and are uninsured or receive Medi-Cal benefits. b. Total Number served by clinic: For FY 15-16: Approximately 2,888 Individuals. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 809 4. Plan Element: Coaching to Wellness/Performance Improvement Project - INN The Coaching to Wellness program provides an additional level of support for adult mental health consumers with certain chronic health conditions through intensive peer and nurse support. With components from intensive peer support coupled with leveraging existing resources in the County, the Coaching to Wellness program provides a holistic team approach to providing care to our consumers. The goals of the program are to: 1) Improve consumer perception of their own wellness and well- being; 2) Increase healthy behaviors and decrease symptoms for consumers; and 3) Increase cross-service collaboration among primary and mental health care staff. a. Target Population: Adults aged 18 years and older who are currently receiving psychiatric-only services at a County-operated Adult clinic; Diagnosed with a serious mental illness (but at a stage to be engaged in recover); Diagnosed with a chronic health risk condition of cardiac, metabolic, respiratory, and/or have weight issues; Expressed an interest in the program; and indicated a moderate to high composite score on mental health and medical levels of support needed. b. Total Budget: $222.752 c. MHSA-funded Staff: 5.0 Full-time equivalents d. Total Number served: Program began in FY 15/16. The expected case load is approximately 10-20 consumers per clinic for an approximately six month service duration period. e. Outcomes: Evaluation of the program includes pre- and post-surveys that measure key indicators in areas such as: perceived recovery, functioning, and quality of life. Self-rated health and mental health data is collected by the Wellness Coaches and Nurses at most individual contacts and vitals collected and levels of support assessed by the Wellness Nurses as needed. Satisfaction and achievement on self-identified wellness goals recorded at post-program. Other proposed indicators include primary care and mental health appointment attendance, and utilization rate of involuntary psychiatric emergency admissions and/or acute psychiatric admissions. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 810 East County Children’s Mental Health Clinic (Contra Costa Behavioral Health) Point of Contact: Eileen Brooks, Program Manager Contact Information: 3501 Lone Tree Way, #200, Antioch, CA 94509, (925) 427-8545, Eileen.Brooks@hsd.cccounty.us 1. General Description of the Organization The Behavioral Health Services Division of Contra Costa Health Services combines Mental Health, Alcohol & Other Drugs and Homeless Program into a single system of care. The Central Children’s Mental Health Clinic operates within Contra Costa Mental Health’s Children’s System of Care, and provides psychiatric and outpatient services, family partners, and wraparound services. Within the Children’s Mental Health Clinic are the following MHSA funded plan elements: 2. Plan Element: Clinic Support - CSS General Systems Development strategies are programs or strategies that improve the larger mental health system of care. These programs and strategies expand and enhance the existing service structure to assist consumers in the following areas: • Family Partners and Wraparound Facilitation. The family partners assist families with advocacy, transportation assistance, navigation of the service system, and offer support in the home, community, and county service sites. Family partners support families with children of all ages who are receiving services in the children. Family partners are located in each of the regional clinics for children and adult services, and often participate on wraparound teams following the evidence-based model. • A Clinical Specialist in each regional clinic who provides technical assistance and oversight of evidence-based practices in the clinic. • Support for full service partners. a. Target Population: Children aged 17 years and younger, who live in East County, are diagnosed with a serious emotional disturbance or serious mental illness, and are uninsured or receive Medi-Cal benefits. b. Number served by clinic: For FY 15/16: Approximately 1,521 Individuals. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 811 First Five Contra Costa Point of Contact: Wanda Davis Contact Information: 1486 Civic Ct, Concord Ca 94520. (925) 771-7300 wdavis@firstfivecc.org 1. General Description of the Organization The mission of First 5 Contra Costa is to foster the optimal development of children, prenatal to five years of age. In partnership with parents, caregivers, communities, public and private organizations, advocates, and county government, First Five supports a comprehensive, integrated set of sustainable programs, services, and activities designed to improve the health and well-being of young children, advance their potential to succeed in school, and strengthen the ability of their families and caregivers to provide for their physical, mental, and emotional growth. 2. Programs: Triple P Positive Parenting Program - (PEI) a. Scope of Services: First Five Contra Costa and Contra Costa Behavioral Health jointly fund the Triple P Positive Parenting Program that is provided to parents of 0 to 5 children. The intent is to reduce the maltreatment of children by increasing a family’s ability to manage their children’s behavior and to normalize the need for support to develop positive parenting skills. The Triple P program provides timely access to service by placing the classes throughout county and offering classes year round. The Program has been proven effect across various cultures, and ethnic groups. Triple P is an evidence based practice that provides preventive and intervention support. First 5 Contra Costa provides over-site to of the subcontractor, works closely with the subcontractor on program implementation, identify, recruit and on board new Triple P Practitioners, management the database, review of outcome measurements, and quality improvement efforts. The partnership intended outcome is the outreach for increase recognition of early signs of mental illness. b. Target Population: Contra Costa County parents of at risk 0 – 5 children. c. Payment Limit: $77,250 d. Number served: For FY 15/16: 241 parents of children 0 – 5 yrs ( C.O.P.E.) e. Outcomes: • Completed 16 parent education classes and nine seminar for parents of children age 0 – 5 (C.O.P.E.) June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 812 First Hope (Contra Costa Behavioral Health) Point of Contact: Phyllis Mace, Mental Health Program Supervisor Contact Information: 1034 Oak Grove Rd, Concord, CA 94518 (925) 681-4450 Phyllis.Mace@hsd.cccounty.us 1. General Description of the Organization The Behavioral Health Services Division of Contra Costa Health Services combines Mental Health, Alcohol & Other Drugs and Homeless Program into a single system of care. The First Hope program operates within Contra Costa Mental Health’s Children’s System of Care but is a hybrid program serving both children and young adults. 2. Program: First Hope: Early Identification and Intervention in Psychosis - PEI a. Scope of Service: The mission of the First Hope program is to reduce the incidence and associated disability of psychotic illnesses in Contra Costa County through: • Early Identification of young people between ages 12 and 25 who are showing very early signs of psychosis and are determined to be at risk for developing a serious mental illness. • Engaging and providing immediate treatment to those identified as “at risk”, while maintaining progress in school, work and social relationships. • Providing an integrated, multidisciplinary team approach including psychoeducation, multi-family groups, individual and family counseling, case management, occupational therapy, supported education and vocation and psychiatric management within a single service model. • Outreach and community education with the following goals: 1) identifying all young people in Contra Costa County who are at risk for developing a psychotic disorder and would benefit from early intervention services; and 2) reducing stigma and barriers that prevent or delay seeking treatment through educational presentations. b. Target Population: 12-25 year old transition age youth and their families c. Total Budget: $1,685,607 d. Staff: 14 FTE full time equivalent multi-disciplinary staff e. Number served: For FY 15/16: 73 clients and their families served (assessments and clinical services). On any given day, the between 55 and 70 clients and their families are open to services. Additionally, First Hope provided ongoing outreach education reaching 561 participants in the community and 157 initial phone screenings and consultation to at risk individuals, families, or providers. f. Outcomes: • Help clients manage prodromal symptoms • Help clients maintain progress in school, work, relationships • Reduce the stigma associated with symptoms • Prevent development of psychotic illnesses • Reduce necessity to access psychiatric emergency serves/ inpatient care June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 813 Long Term Public Health Outcomes: • Reduce conversion rate from prodromal symptoms to schizophrenia • Reduce incidence of psychotic illnesses in Contra Costa County. • Increase community awareness and acceptance of the value and advantages of seeking mental health care early. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 814 Forensic Mental Health (Contra Costa Behavioral Health) Point of Contact: Marie Scannell, Program Manager Contact Information: 1430 Willow Pass Road, Suite 100, Concord CA 94520. (925) 288-3915. Marie.Scannell@hsd.cccounty.us 1. General Description of the Organization The Behavioral Health Services Division of Contra Costa Health Services combines Mental Health, Alcohol & Other Drugs and Homeless Program into a single system of care. The Forensic Services team operates within Contra Costa Mental Health’s Adult System of Care, and works closely with Adult Probation. 2. Program: Forensic Services The Forensics Services team is a multidisciplinary team comprised of mental health clinical specialists, registered nurses, alcohol and other drugs specialists, homeless benefits specialists, and community support workers. The purpose of the team is to engage and offer voluntary services to participants who are seriously and persistently mentally ill and are involved in the criminal justice system. Forensic Services hosts office hours at the three regional probation offices to enhance the opportunity for screening and service participation. The co-located model allows for increased collaboration among the participants, service providers, and Deputy Probation Officers. a. Scope of Services: Authorized in Fiscal Year 2011-12 four clinical specialists were funded by MHSA to join Forensics Services Team. These clinicians provide services to individuals who were determined to be high users of psychiatric emergency services and other public resources, but very low users of the level and type of care needed. This team works very closely with the criminal justice system to assess referrals for serious mental illness, provide rapid access to a treatment plan, and work as a team to provide the appropriate mental health, substance abuse and housing services needed. b. Target Population: Individuals who are seriously and persistently mentally ill who are on probation and at risk of re-offending and incarceration. c. Budget: $982,245 d. MHSA-Funded Staff: 4.0 Full-time equivalent e. Number Served in FY 15/16: i. AB109 team: 127 cases were referred, and 29 additional cases were screened. ii. MHET team: 200+ referred iii. AOT team: This program started 2/1/16, and the numbers are only for the first few months of 2016. 108 referrals received, 38 determined to be AOT eligible, and 17 enrolled in ACT. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 815 f. Outcomes: The Forensics Team will report on the following outcomes in future MHSA Plans: • Percentage of clients screened who are opened by the Forensics Team • Percentage of clients who are opened by the Forensics Team who receive a first appointment at the mental health clinic June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 816 Fred Finch Youth Center Point of Contact: Kimberly Powers, LCSW, Program Director Contact Information: 2523 El Portal Drive, Suite 201, San Pablo, CA 94806, (510) 439–3130, ext. 6107, kimberlypowers@fredfinch.org 1. General Description of the Organization Fred Finch Youth Center (FFYC) seeks to provide innovative, effective, caring mental health and social services to children, young adults, and their families that allow them to build on their strengths, overcome challenges, and live healthy and productive lives. FFYC serves children, adolescents, young adults, and families facing complex life challenges. Many have experienced trauma and abuse; live at or below the poverty line; have been institutionalized or incarcerated; have a family member that has been involved in the criminal justice system; have a history of substance abuse; or have experienced discrimination or stigma. 2. Program: Contra Costa Transition Age Youth Full Service Partnership - CSS Fred Finch Youth Center is the lead agency that collaborates with the Contra Costa Youth Continuum of Services, The Latina Center and Contra Costa Mental Health to provide a full service partnership program for transition age youth in West and Central Contra Costa County. a. Scope of Services: Services will be provided using an integrated team approach, based on a modified Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) model of care. The team includes a personal service coordinator working in concert with a multi- disciplinary team of staff, including peer and family mentors, a psychiatric nurse practitioner, staff with various clinical specialties, including co-occurring substance disorder and bi-lingual capacity. Services include: • Outreach and engagement • Case management • Outpatient Mental Health Services, including services for individuals with co- occurring mental health & alcohol and other drug problems • Crisis Intervention • Collateral • Medication support (may be provided by County Physician) • Housing support • Flexible funds • Referrals to Money Management services as needed • Supported Employment Services • Available to consumer on 24/7 basis b. Target Population: Young adults ages 16 to 25 years with serious mental illness or serious emotional disturbance. These young adults exhibit key risk factors of homelessness, limited English proficiency, co-occurring substance abuse, exposure to trauma, repeated school failure, multiple foster-care or family- June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 817 caregiver placements, and experience with the juvenile justice system and/or Psychiatric Emergency Services. FFYC serves Central and West County. c. Payment Limit: $1,442,661 d. Number served: For FY 15/16: 89 Individuals. f. Outcomes: For FY 15/16: • Reduction in incidence of psychiatric crisis • Reduction of the incidence of restriction Table 4. Pre- and post-enrollment utilization rates for 89 Fred Finch FSP participants enrolled in the FSP program during FY 15-16 No. pre- No. post- Rate pre- Rate post- % change enrollment enrollment enrollment enrollment PES episodes 91 47 0.116 0.062 -46.5 Inpatient episodes 36 11 0.049 0.015 -69.3 Inpatient days 259 61 0.344 0.086 -75 * Data on service utilization were collected from the county’s internal billing system, PSP. To assess the effect of FSP enrollment on PES presentations and inpatient episodes, this methodology compares clients’ monthly rates of service utilization pre-enrollment to clients’ post-enrollment service utilization rates. Using PES usage as an example, the calculations used to assess pre- and post-enrollment utilization rates can be expressed as: (No. of PES episodes during pre- enrollment period)/(No. of months in pre- enrollment period) =Pre-enrollment monthly PES utilization rate (No. of PES episodes during post-enrollment period)/(No. of months in post- enrollment period) =Post-enrollment monthly PES utilization rate June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 818 George and Cynthia Miller Wellness Center (Contra Costa Behavioral Health) Point of Contact: Thomas Tighe, Mental Health Program Manager Contact Information: 25 Allen Street, Martinez CA 94553. (925) 890-5932 Thomas.Tighe@hsd.cccounty.us 1. General Description of the Organization The Behavioral Health Services Division of Contra Costa Health Services combines Mental Health, Alcohol & Other Drugs and Homeless Program into a single system of care. The George and Cynthia Miller Wellness Center is a Federally Qualified Health Center under the Contra Costa Health Services Hospital and Clinics Division. 2. Program: George and Cynthia Miller Wellness Center (Formerly the Assessment and Recovery Center) The George and Cynthia Miller Wellness Center (Miller Wellness Center) provides a number of services to the Contra Costa Behavioral Health Services’ system of care consumers that includes the diversion of children and adults from Psychiatric Emergency Services (PES). Children and adults who are evaluated at PES may step-down to the Miller Wellness Center if they do not need hospital level of care. The Miller Wellness Center offers urgent same-day appointments for individuals who are not open to the Contra Costa Mental Health System, or who have disconnected from care after previously being seen. Services include brief family therapy, medication refills, substance abuse counseling, and general non-acute assistance. In addition, the Center provides appointments for patients post psychiatric inpatient discharge. This provides the opportunity for a successful transition that ensures that medications are obtained and appointments are scheduled in the home clinic. The behavioral health service site is located in a Federally Qualified Health Center with separate entrances from the physical health side. a. Target Population: Children and adults who are being diverted from PES, transition from inpatient, and consumers not yet connected to the outpatient system of care. b. Total Budget: $319,819 c. Staff funded through MHSA: 3 FTE – A Program Manager, and two Community Support Workers. d. Number Served: To Be Determined e. Outcomes: To Be Determined June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 819 James Morehouse Project at El Cerrito High, YMCA East Bay Point of Contact: Jenn Rader (Director) Contact Information: 540 Ashbury Ave, El Cerrito, CA 94530 (510) 231-1437 jenn@jmhop.org 1. General Description of the Organization The James Morehouse Project (JMP) works to create positive change within El Cerrito High School through health services, counseling, youth leadership projects and campus-wide school climate initiatives. Founded in 1999, the JMP assumes youth have the skills, values and commitments to create change in their own lives and the life of the school community. The JMP partners with community and government agencies, local providers and universities. 2. Program: James Morehouse Project (JMP) - PEI a. Scope of Services: The James Morehouse Project (JMP), the school health center at El Cerrito High School (fiscal sponsor: YMCA of the East Bay), will provide services that increase access to mental health/health services and a wide range of innovative youth development programs for 300 multicultural youth in West Contra Costa County. The JMP will provide a wide range of innovative youth development programs through an on-campus collaborative of community- based agencies, local universities and County programs. Key activities designed to improve students’ well-being and success in school include: AOD Prevention; Migrations/Journeys (immigration/acculturation); Bereavement Groups (loss of a loved one); Culture Keepers (youth of color leadership); Discovering the Realities of Our Communities (DROC – environmental and societal factors that contribute to substance abuse); Peer Conflict Mediation; Mindfulness skills (anger/stress management); Young men’s gender/relationship. As an on-campus student health center, we are uniquely situated to maximize access and linkage to mental health services for young people from underserved communities. We are able to connect directly with young people here at school and provide timely, ongoing and consistent services to them here on-site. Because the JMP also offers a wide range of youth development programs and activities, our space has the energy and safety of a youth center. For that reason, students do not experience any stigma around coming into the health center or accessing services here. b. Target Population: At-risk students at El Cerrito High School c. Payment Limit: $97,000 d. Numbers Served: For FY 15/16: 300+ June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 820 e. Outcomes: • Stronger connection to caring adults/peers (build relationships with caring adult(s), peers) for participating youth. • Increase in well-being (diminished perceptions of stress/anxiety, improvement in family/loved-one relationships, increased self-confidence, etc.) for participating youth. • Strengthened connection to school (more positive assessment of teacher/staff relationships, positive peer connections, ties with caring adults) for participating youth. • Reduce likelihood of ECHS youth being excluded from school. • Strengthened culture of safety, connectedness and inclusion schoolwide Measures of Success • 90% of participating students will show an improvement across a range of resiliency indicators, using a resiliency assessment tool that measures change in assets within the academic year, 2016 to 2017. • 90% of participating students will report an increase in well-being through self-report on a qualitative evaluation tool within the academic year, 2016 to 2017. • ECHS School Climate Index (SCI) score will increase by 15 or more points from 2016 to 2017. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 821 Jewish Family and Community Services East Bay (JFCS/ East Bay) Point of Contact: Amy Weiss, Director of Refugee and Immigrant Services Contact Information: 1855 Olympic Blvd. #200, Walnut Creek, Ca 94596 (925) 927-2000, aweiss@jfcs-eastbay.org 1. General Description of the Organization Jewish Family & Community Services/ East Bay is one of the oldest and largest family service institutions in the United States. Today, JFCS/ East Bay serves 76,000 people annually with the bi-lingual, bi-cultural social services designed to strengthen individuals, families, and the community. As a problem-solving center for residents of several Bay Area counties, JFCS/ East Bay strives to be a lifeline for children, families, and older adults facing life transitions and personal crises. 2. Program: Community Bridges. a. Scope of Services: During the term of this contract, Jewish Family & Community Services East Bay will assist Contra Costa Mental Health to implement the Mental Health Services Act (MHSA), Prevention and Early Intervention Program “Reducing Risk of Developing Mental Illness” by providing Outreach and Engagement to Underserved Communities with the Community Bridges Program, providing culturally grounded, community-directed mental health education and navigation services to 300-400 refugees and immigrants of all ages and sexual orientations in the Afghan, Syrian, Iranian, Iraqi, African, and Russian communities of central Contra Costa County. Prevention and early intervention-oriented program components include culturally and linguistically accessible mental health education; early assessment and intervention for individuals and families; and health and mental health system navigation assistance. Services will be provided in the context of group settings and community cultural events, as well as with individuals and families, using a variety of convenient non-office settings such as schools, senior centers, and client homes. In addition, the program will include mental health training for frontline staff from JFCS East Bay and other community agencies working with diverse cultural populations, especially those who are refugees and immigrants. The Contractor’s program shall be carried out as set forth in the Work Plan for this Contract, which is incorporated herein by reference, a copy of which is on file in the office of the County’s Mental Health Director and a copy of which the County has furnished to the Contractor. Individuals receiving Contractor’s services pursuant to this Agreement are hereinafter referred to as “Clients.” These clients are also Clients of the County’s Mental Health Division and other County-approved referral agencies. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 822 b. Target Population: Immigrant and refugee families of Contra Costa County at risk for developing a serious mental illness. c. Payment Limit: $164,469 d. Number served: For FY 15/16: 341 e. Outcomes: Clients received individual mental health, health, system navigation support • Mental Health Education Groups (attendance ranging between 10 and 58), covering a wide range of topics including parenting, cultural adjustment of immigrants, hoarding, early signs of mental illness. • Cross cultural mental health training series aimed at helping service providers (20 to 41 per training) understand importance of cross cultural issues. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 823 Juvenile Justice System – Supporting Youth (Contra Costa Behavioral Health) Point of Contact: Daniel Batiuchok, Program Manager Contact Information: 202 Glacier Drive, Martinez, CA 94553 (925) 957-2739 Daniel.Batiuchok@hsd.cccounty.us 1. General Description of the Organization The Behavioral Health Services Division of Contra Costa Health Services combines Mental Health, Alcohol & Other Drugs and Homeless Program into a single system of care. The staff working to support youth in the juvenile justice system operate within Contra Costa Mental Health’s Children’s System of Care. 2. Program: Mental Health Probation Liaisons and Orin Allen Youth Ranch Clinicians - PEI County mental health clinicians strive to help youth experiencing the juvenile justice system become emotionally mature and law abiding members of their communities. Services include screening and assessment, consultation, therapy, and case management for inmates of the Juvenile Detention Facility and juveniles on probation, who are at risk of developing or struggle with mental illness or severe emotional disturbance. a. Scope of Services: Orin Allen Youth Rehabilitation Facility (OAYRF) OAYRF provides 100 beds for seriously delinquent boys ages 13-21, who have been committed by the Juvenile Court. OAYRF provides year-round schooling, drug education and treatment, Aggression Replacement Training, and extracurricular activities (gardening, softball). Additionally, the following mental health services are provided at OAYRF: psychological screening and assessment, crisis assessment and intervention, risk assessment, individual therapy and consultation, family therapy, psychiatric services (pilot expected to begin fall 2015), case management and transition planning Mental Health Probation Liaison Services MHAPS has a team of three mental health probation liaisons stationed at each of the three field probation offices (in East, Central, and West Contra Costa County). The mental health probation liaisons are responsible for assisting youth and families as they transition out of detention settings and return to their communities. Services include: providing mental health and social service referrals, short term case management, short term individual therapy, short term family therapy. Additionally, the mental health probation liaisons are responsible for conducting court-ordered mental health assessments for youth within the county detention system. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 824 b. Target Population: Youth in the juvenile justice system in need of mental health support c. Total Budget: $500,000 d. Staff: 5 Mental Health Clinical Specialists: 3 probation liaisons, 2 clinicians at the Ranch e. Number served: For FY 15/16: 300+ f. Outcomes: • Help youth address mental health and substance abuse issues that may underlie problems with delinquency • Increased access to mental health services and other community resources for at risk youth • Decrease of symptoms of mental health disturbance • Increase of help seeking behavior; decrease stigma associated with mental illness. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 825 La Clinica de la Raza Point of Contact: Leslie Preston Contact Information: La Clinica Monument, 2000 Sierra Rd, Concord, 94518. (510) 535-6200 Lpreston@laclinica.org 1. General Description of the Organization With 31 sites spread across Alameda, Contra Costa and Solano Counties, La Clínica delivers culturally and linguistically appropriate health care services to address the needs of the diverse populations it serves. La Clínica is one of the largest community health centers in California. 2. Program: Vias de Salud and Familias Fuertes (PEI) a. Scope of Services: La Clínica de La Raza, Inc. (La Clínica) will implement Vías de Salud (Pathways to Health) to target Latinos residing in Central and East Contra Costa County with: a) 3,000 depression screenings; b) 500 assessment and early intervention services provided by a Behavioral Health Specialists to identify risk of mental illness or emotional distress, or other risk factors such as social isolation; and c) 1,000 follow up support/brief treatment services to adults covering a variety of topics such as depression, anxiety, isolation, stress, communication and cultural adjustment. La Clínica’s PEI program category is Improving Timely Access to Services for Underserved Populations. Contractor will also implement Familias Fuertes (Strong Families), to educate and support Latino parents and caregivers living in Central and East Contra Costa County so that they can support the strong development of their children and youth. The project activities will include: 1) Screening for risk factors in youth ages 0-18 (750 screenings); 2) 150 Assessments (includes child functioning and parent education/support) with the a Behavioral Health Specialist will be provided to parents/caretakers of children ages 0-18; 3), Two hundred (200) follow up visits with children/families to provide psycho-education/brief treatment regarding behavioral health issues including parent education, psycho-social stressors/risk factors and behavioral health issues. The goal is to be designed and implemented to help create access and linkage to mental health treatment, be designed, implemented and promoted in ways that improve timely access to mental health treatment services for persons and/or families from underserved populations, and be designed, implemented and promoted using strategies that are non-stigmatizing and non-discriminatory. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 826 b. Target Population: Contra Costa County Latino residents at risk for developing a serious mental illness. a. Payment Limit: Vias de Salud: $148,464. Familias Fuertes: $115,988. b. Number served For FY 15/16: 5748 Screens were administered to 4696 clients c. Outcomes: Vias de Salud - Participants of support groups reported reduction in isolation and depression. Familias Fuertes - 100% of parents reported increased knowledge about positive family communication, 100% of parents reported improved skills, behavior, and family relationships. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 827 The Latina Center Point of Contact: Miriam Wong, 3701 Barrett Ave #12, Richmond, CA 94805 (510) 233-8595, miriamrwong@gmail.com 1. General Description of the Organization The Latina Center is an organization of and for Latinas that strive to develop emerging leaders in the San Francisco Bay Area through innovative training, support groups and leadership programs. The mission of The Latina Center is to improve the quality of life and health of the Latino Community by providing leadership and personal development opportunities for Latina women. 2. Program: Familias Fuertes - PEI a. Scope of Services: The Latina Center (TLC) provides culturally and linguistically specific parenting education and support to at least 300 Latino parents and caregivers in West Contra Costa County that 1) supports healthy emotional, social and educational development of children and youth ages 0-15, and 2) reduces verbal, physical and emotional abuse. The Latina Center enrolls primarily low- income, immigrant, monolingual/bilingual Latino parents and grandparent caregivers of high-risk families in a 12-week parenting class using the Systematic Training for Effective Parenting (STEP) curriculum or PECES in Spanish (Padres Eficaces con Entrenamiento Eficaz). Parent Advocates are trained to conduct parenting education classes, and Parent Partners are trained to offer mentoring, support and systems navigation. TLC provides family activity nights, creative learning circles, cultural celebrations, and community forums on parenting topics. b. Target Population: Latino Families and their children in West County at risk for developing serious mental illness. c. Payment Limit: $105,403 d. Number served: For 15/16: 307 e. Outcomes: • 100% of the 307 parent participants surveyed responded that the program has helped them become a better parent, improve their relationships with their family, improved communication with their children and given them more strategies for relating to and raising their children. • 25 classes were held in Richmond/San Pablo schools, churches and community centers. • Goal to engage Latino Fathers • Referrals to a peer support group at The Latina Center where one can obtained emotional support and developed personal skills (i.e. learned to identify and manage their emotions, learned to identify domestic violence, learned to implement stress management techniques, and more). June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 828 LAO Family Community Development Point of Contact: Kathy Chao Rothberg Contact Information: 1865 Rumrill Blvd. Suite #B, San Pablo, Ca 94806 (510) 215-1220 KRothberg@lfcd.org 1. General Description of the Organization Founded in 1980, Lao Family Community Development, Inc. (LFCD) annually assists more than 15,000 diverse refugee, immigrant, limited English, and low- income U.S. born community members in achieving long-term financial and social self-sufficiency. LFCD delivers timely, linguistically, and culturally appropriate services using an integrated service model that addresses the needs of the entire family unit, with the goal of achieving self-sufficiency in one generation. 2. Program: Health and Well-Being for Asian Families - PEI a. Scope of Services: Lao Family Community Development, Inc. provides a comprehensive and culturally sensitive Prevention Program that combines an integrated service system approach for serving underserved Asian and South East Asian adults throughout Contra Costa County. The program activities designed and implemented includes: comprehensive case management; evidence based educational workshops using the Strengthening Families Curriculum; and peer support groups. Strategies used reflect non-discriminatory and non-stigmatizing values. We will provide outreach, education and support to a diverse underserved population to facilitate increased development of problem solving skills, increase protective factors to ensure families emotional well-being, stability, and resilience. We will provide timely access, referral and linkage to increase client’s access to mental health treatment and health care providers in the community based, public and private system. LFCD provides in language outreach, education, and support to develop problem solving skills, and increase families’ emotional well-being and stability, and help reduce the stigmas and discriminations associated with experiencing mental health. The staff provides a client centered, family focused, strength based case management and planning process, to include home visits, brief counseling, parenting classes, advocacy and referral to other in-house services such as employment services, financial education, and housing services. These services are provided in client homes and other community based settings and the offices of Lao Family in San Pablo. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 829 b. Target Population: South Asian and South East Asian Families at risk for developing serious mental illness. c. Payment Limit: $169,926 d. Number served: For FY 15/16: 124 e. Outcomes: • 100% of program participants completed the Lubben Social Networking Scale assessments. • High participation and completion rates suggest cohesiveness among participants and reduction of social isolation. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 830 Lifelong Medical Care Point of Contact: Kathryn Stambaugh Contact Information: 2344 6th Street, Berkeley, CA 94710 (510) 981-4156 kstambaugh@lifelongmedical.org 1. General Description of the Organization Founded in 1976, LifeLong Medical Care (LifeLong) is a multi-site safety-net provider of comprehensive medical, dental, behavioral health and social services to low-income individuals and families in West Contra Costa and Northern Alameda counties. In 2015, LifeLong provided over 225,000 health care visits to more than 45,000 people of all ages. 2. Program: Senior Network and Activity Program (SNAP) and Elderly Learning Community (ELC) - PEI a. Scope of Services: Lifelong Medical Care reaches isolated and underserved older adults in West Contra Costa County and links them to mental health care through door-to-door outreach in public housing and referrals from community and county organizations, such as Senior Peer Counseling and Adult Protective Services. All services are designed with consumer input to promote feelings of wellness and self-efficacy, address feelings of anxiety and depression, reduce the effects of stigma and discrimination, build community connections, and provide timely access to underserved populations who are reluctant or unable to access other mental health services. LifeLong’s PEI services include two components: the Senior Network and Activity Program (SNAP) and the Elders Learning Community (ELC). SNAP brings therapeutic and life-changing drama, art, music and wellness programs to public housing residents. The program operates on-site at two locations (Nevin Plaza and Friendship Manor) at least seven times per month, with transportation provided between these sites. Services also include quarterly outings, screening for depression and isolation, information and referral services, and outreach to invite participation in group activities and develop a rapport with residents. The Elders Learning Community is an arts, education, and engagement program for highly isolated older adults that connects consumers with trained volunteer learning partners as well as other consumers who share similar interests. The ELC also provides case management services, connecting seniors to local resources as a way to help them remain living independently. Services are designed to improve timely access to mental health treatment services for persons and/or families from underserved populations, utilizing strategies that are non-stigmatizing and non-discriminatory. The expected impact of these services includes: Reducing isolation and promoting feelings of June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 831 wellness and self-efficacy; increasing trust and reducing reluctance to revealing unmet needs or accepting support services; decreasing stigma and discrimination among underserved populations: and improving quality of life by reducing loneliness and promoting friendships and connections with others. b. Target Population: Seniors in low income housing projects at risk for developing serious mental illness. c. Payment Limit: $123,279 d. Number served: For FY 15/16: 136 e. Outcomes: • More than 50% of participants demonstrated self-efficacy and purpose by successfully completing at least one long-term project through SNAP or the ELC. • On average, PHQ-2 scores improved by 40% among participants who completed the screening tool. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 832 Lincoln Point of Contact: Christine Stoner-Mertz, CEO Contact Information: 1266 14th St, Oakland CA 94607, (510) 273-4700 chrisstoner@lincolnchildcenter.org 1. General Description of the Organization Lincoln (formerly “Lincoln Child Center”) was founded in 1883 as the region's first volunteer-run, non-sectarian, and fully integrated orphanage. As times and community needs evolved, Lincoln's commitment to vulnerable children remained strong. In 1951, Lincoln began serving abused, neglected and emotionally challenged children. Today, as a highly respected provider of children's services, Lincoln has a continuum of programs to serve challenged children and families throughout the Bay Area. Their community based services include early intervention programs in the Oakland and Pittsburg School Districts aimed at stopping the cycle of violence, abuse and mental health problems for at-risk children and families. 2. Program: Multi-Dimensional Family Therapy (MDFT) – Full Service Partnership CSS Multidimensional Family Therapy (MDFT), an evidence-based practice, is a comprehensive and multi-systemic family-based outpatient program for youth and adolescents with co-occurring substance use and mental health disorders who may be at high risk for continued substance abuse and other problem behaviors, such as conduct disorder and delinquency. Working with the youth and their families, MDFT helps youth develop more effective coping and problem solving skills for better decision making, and helps the family improve interpersonal functioning as a protective factor against substance abuse and related problems. Services are delivered over 4 to 6 months, with weekly or twice-weekly, face-to-face contact, either in the home, the community or in the clinic. a. Scope of Services • Services include but are not limited to: • Outreach and engagement • Case management • Outpatient Mental Health Services • Crisis Intervention • Collateral Services • Group Rehab • Flexible funds • Contractor must be available to consumer on 24/7 basis b. Target Population: Children ages 11 to 19 years in West, Central and East County experiencing co-occurring serious mental health and substance abuse disorders. Youth and their families can be served by this program. c. Payment Limit: $874,417 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 833 d. Number served: The program served 78 clients in FY15/16. e. Outcomes: For FY 15/16: • Reduction in incidence of psychiatric crisis • Reduction of the incidence of restriction Table 5. Pre- and post-enrollment utilization rates for 78 Lincoln Child Center, participants enrolled in the FSP program during FY 15-16 No. pre- No. post- Rate pre- Rate post- %change enrollment enrollment enrollment enrollment PES episodes 19 9 0.032 0.012 -62.5 Inpatient episodes 2 2 0.003 0.004 +33.3 Inpatient days 6 8 0.010 0.004 -60 JACS 25 15 0.037 0.022 -40.5 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 834 LTP CarePro, Inc. (Pleasant Hill Manor) Point of Contact: Tony Perez. Contact Information: 40 Boyd Road, Pleasant Hill CA, 94523, (925) 937-5348, phm@att.net 1. General Description of the Organization The County contracts with Pleasant Hill Manor, a licensed board and care operator, to provide additional staff care to enable those with serious mental illness to avoid institutionalization and enable them to live in the community. 2. Program: Augmented Board and Cares – MHSA Housing Services - CSS a. Scope of Services: Augmented residential services, including but not limited to: • medication management • nutritional meal planning • assistance with laundry • transportation to psychiatric and medical appointments • improving socialization • assist with activities of daily living (i.e., grooming, hygiene, etc.) • encouraging meaningful activity • other services as needed for individual residents b. Target Population: Adults aged 60 years and older, who live in Central County, are diagnosed with a serious mental illness and are uninsured or receive Medi- Cal benefits. c. Annual MHSA Payment Limit: $ 92,700 d. Number served: For FY 15/16: 21 beds available. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 835 Mental Health Services Act Housing Services (Contra Costa Health, Housing, and Homeless) Point of Contact: Jenny Robbins, LCSW , Housing and Services Administrator, Contact Information: 1350 Arnold Drive, Suite 202, Martinez CA 94553. (925) 313-7706. Jenny.Robbins@hsd.cccounty.us 1. General Description of the Organization The Behavioral Health Services Division of Contra Costa Health Services combines Mental Health, Alcohol & Other Drugs and Homeless Program into a single system of care. The County-operated MHSA Housing Services operates within Contra Costa Homeless Program. 2. Program: Homeless Programs -- Temporary Shelter Beds The County’s Homeless Services Division operates a number of temporary bed facilities in West and Central County for transitional age youth and adults. In 2010, CCMH entered into a Memorandum of Understanding with the Homeless Services Division that provides additional funding to enable up to 64 individuals with a serious mental illness per year to receive temporary emergency housing for up to four months. a. Target Population: Individuals who are severely and persistently mentally ill or seriously emotionally disturbed, and are homeless. b. Total MHSA Portion of Budget: $1,931,296 c. Number Served in FY 15/16: 64 beds fully utilized for 365 days in the year. 3. Program: Permanent Housing Having participated in a specially legislated MHSA Housing Program through the California Housing Finance Agency the County, in collaboration with many community partners, the County completed a number of one-time capitalization projects to create 40 permanent housing units for individuals with serious mental illness. These individuals receive their mental health support from Contra Costa Mental Health contract and county service providers. The sites include Villa Vasconcellos in Walnut Creek, Lillie Mae Jones Plaza in North Richmond, The Virginia Street Apartments in Richmond, Robin Lane apartments in Concord, Ohlone Garden apartments in El Cerrito, Third Avenue Apartments in Walnut Creek, Garden Park apartments in Concord, and scattered units throughout the County operated by Anka Behavioral Health. a. Target Population: Individuals who are severely and persistently mentally ill or seriously emotionally disturbed and are homeless or at risk of homelessness. b. Total MHSA Portion of Budget: One Time Funding Allocated c. Number Served in FY 15/16: 50 units. d. Outcome: To Be Determined June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 836 4. Program: Coordination Team Behavioral Health Housing Services Coordinator and staff work closely with County’s Homeless Services Division staff to coordinate referrals and placements, facilitate linkages with other Contra Costa mental health programs and services, and provide contract monitoring and quality control. In addition, the Homeless Program receives MHSA funds to cover repair and maintenance costs for mental health consumers receiving services through the Destination Home program. Destination Home is spearheaded by the Contra Costa Health Services Homeless Program to provide permanent supportive housing for chronically homeless disabled individuals. a. Target Population: Individuals who are severely and persistently mentally ill or seriously emotionally disturbed and are homeless or at risk of homelessness. b. Total FTE: 4.0 FTE c. Total MHSA Portion of Budget: $522,511 d. Number Served in FY 15/16: Support to MHSA Housing Services and the Homeless Program. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 837 Mental Health Systems, Inc. Point of Contact: Crystal Luna-Yarnell, MFT, Program Manager Contact Information: 2280 Diamond Blvd., #500, Concord, CA 94520 (925) 483-2223 cluna@mhsinc.org 1. General Description of the Organization Mental Health Systems (MHS) provides mental health services and substance abuse treatment designed to improve the lives of individuals, families and communities. MHS operates over 80 programs throughout central and southern California and has recently contracted with Contra Costa Behavioral Health to provide Assisted Outpatient Treatment/Assertive Community Treatment services to residents of Contra Costa County. 2. Program: MHS Contra Costa ACTiOn Team - CSS Mental Health Systems, Inc. (MHS) will provide Assisted Outpatient Treatment (AOT) services and subsequent Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) Full Service Partnership (FSP) services for up to 75 eligible adults in Contra Costa County. Program services shall meet the requirements of AB 1421 (Laura’s Law) while respecting the choice, autonomy and dignity of individuals struggling with the symptoms of serious mental illness (SMI) and/or co-occurring substance abuse disorders. The Contra Costa ACTiOn program will be inclusive of outreach, engagement and support in the investigatory process of AOT determination and the subsequent provision of ACT services. MHS’ FSP program model will incorporate an ACT Team whose multidisciplinary members will provide intensive community-based services to adults with SMI and co-occurring substance abuse disorders, who a) establish an AOT court settlement agreement, b) are court-ordered to receive these services, or c) meet the criteria and agree to voluntarily accept services. a. Scope of Services: The AOT/ACT Adult Full Service Partnership is a collaborative program that joins the resources of Mental Health Systems, Inc. and Contra Costa County Behavioral Health Services in a program under the auspices of the Mental Health Services Act (MHSA). ACT is an evidence-based treatment model approved by Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). The primary goal of ACT is recovery through community treatment and rehabilitation. b. Target Population: Adults diagnosed with serious mental illness and co- occurring substance abuse disorders, who a) establish an AOT court settlement agreement, b) are court-ordered to receive these services, or c) meet the criteria for FSP services and agree to voluntarily accept services. c. Payment Limit: $1,957,000 d. Number Served: The program served 13 clients in FY15/16. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 838 e. Outcomes: For FY 15/16: • Reduction in incidence of psychiatric crisis • Reduction of the incidence of restriction Table 6. Pre-and post-enrollment utilization rates for 13 Mental Health Systems FSP participants enrolled in the FSP program during FY 15-16 No. pre- No. post- Rate pre- Rate post- %change Enrollment enrollment enrollment enrollment PES episodes 82 14 0.641 0.096 -85.0 Inpatient episodes 18 3 0.166 0.019 -88.5 Inpatient days 124 16 1.160 0.102 -91.2 * Data on service utilization were collected from the county’s internal billing system, PSP. To assess the effect of FSP enrollment on PES presentations and inpatient episodes, this methodology compares clients’ monthly rates of service utilization pre-enrollment to clients’ post-enrollment service utilization rates. Using PES usage as an example, the calculations used to assess pre- and post-enrollment utilization rates can be expressed as: (No. of PES episodes during pre- enrollment period)/ (No. of months in pre- enrollment period) =Pre-enrollment monthly PES utilization rate (No. of PES episodes during post-enrollment period)/ (No. of months in post- enrollment period) =Post-enrollment monthly PES utilization rate June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 839 Modesto Residential Living Center, LLC. Point of Contact: Dennis Monterosso. Contact Information: 1932 Evergreen Avenue, Modesto CA, 95350. (209)530-9300. info@modestoRLC.com 1. General Description of the Organization The County contracts with Modesto Residential, a licensed board and care operator, to provide additional staff care to enable those with serious mental illness to avoid institutionalization and enable them to live in the community. 2. Program: Augmented Board and Cares – MHSA Housing Services - CSS The County contracts with Modesto Residential Living Center, a licensed board and care provider, to provide additional staff care to enable those with serious mental illness to avoid institutionalization and enable them to live in the community. a. Scope of Services: Augmented residential services, including but not limited to: • medication management • nutritional meal planning • assistance with laundry • transportation to psychiatric and medical appointments • improving socialization • assist with activities of daily living (i.e., grooming, hygiene, etc.) • encouraging meaningful activity • other services as needed for individual residents b. Target Population: Adults aged 18 years to 59 years who lived in Contra Costa County, are diagnosed with a serious mental illness and are uninsured or receive Medi-Cal benefits, and accepted augmented board and care at Modesto Residential Living Center. c. Annual MHSA Payment Limit: $ 71,175 d. Number served: For FY 15/16: Capacity of 6 beds, average of 3 beds filled each month. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 840 Native American Health Center (NAHC) Point of Contact: Anthony Taula-Lieras Contact Information: 2566 MacDonald Ave, Richmond, 94804 (510) 434-5483, AnthonyT@nativehealth.org 1. General Description of the Organization The Native American Health Center serves the California Bay Area Native Population and other under-served populations. NAHC has worked at local, state, and federal levels to deliver resources and services for the urban Native American community and other underserved populations, to offer include medical, dental, behavioral health, nutrition, perinatal, substance abuse prevention, HIV/HCV care coordination and prevention services. 2. Program: Native American Wellness Center – PEI a. Scope of Services: Native American Health Center provides outreach for the increase recognition of early signs of mental illness. To this end, they provide mental health prevention groups and quarterly events for Contra Costa County Community Members. These activities help develop partnerships that bring consumers and mental health professionals together to build a community that reflects the history and values of Native American people in Contra Costa County. Community-building activities done by NAHC staff, community members, and consultants, include an elder’s support group, youth wellness group (including suicide prevention and violence prevention activities). Quarterly cultural events and traditional arts groups including: beading, quilting, shawl making and drumming. Other activities include: Positive Indian Parenting to teach life and parenting skills, Talking Circles that improve communications skills and address issues related to mental health, including domestic violence, individual and historical trauma and Gathering of Native Americans (GONA) to build a sense of belonging and cohesive community. Expected outcomes include increases in social connectedness, communication skills, parenting skills, and knowledge of the human service system in the county. Program Staff conduct cultural competency trainings for public officials and other agency personnel. Staff assist with System Navigation including individual peer meetings, referrals to appropriate services (with follow-up), and educational sessions about Contra Costa County’s service system. b. Target Population: Native American residents of Contra Costa County (mainly west region), who are at risk for developing a serious mental illness. c. Payment Limit: $219,824 d. Number served: For FY 15/16: 242 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 841 e. Outcomes: • Program participants will increase social connectedness within a twelve month period. • Program participants will increase family communications. • Participants that engaged in referrals and leadership training increased their ability to navigate the mental health/health/education systems. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 842 Oak Hills Residential Facility Point of Contact: Rebecca Lapasa. Contact Information: 141 Green Meadow Circle, Pittsburg, CA 94565. (925) 709-8853, Rlapasa@yahoo.com 1. General Description of the Organization The County contracts with Oak Hills, a licensed board and care operator, to provide additional staff care to enable those with serious mental illness to avoid institutionalization and enable them to live in the community. 2. Program: Augmented Board and Cares – MHSA Housing Services - CSS a. Scope of Services: Augmented residential services, including but not limited to: • medication management • nutritional meal planning • assistance with laundry • transportation to psychiatric and medical appointments • improving socialization • assist with activities of daily living (i.e., grooming, hygiene, etc.) • encouraging meaningful activity • other services as needed for individual residents b. Target Population: Adults aged 18 years to 59 years who live in Eastern Contra Costa County, are diagnosed with a serious mental illness and are uninsured or receive Medi-Cal benefits. c. Annual MHSA Payment Limit: $ 16,315.00 d. Number served: For FY 15/16: 6 beds. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 843 Office for Consumer Empowerment (Contra Costa Behavioral Health) Point of Contact: Jennifer Tuipulotu Contact Information: 1340 Arnold Drive #200, Martinez, Ca 94553 (925) 957-5206, Jennifer.Tuipulotu@hsd.cccounty.us 1. General Description of the Organization The Office for Consumer Empowerment is a County operated program that supports the entire Behavioral Health System, and offers an range of trainings and supports by and for individuals who have experience receiving mental health services. The goals are to increase access to wellness and empowerment knowledge for consumers of the Behavioral Health System. 2. Program: Reducing Stigma and Discrimination – PEI a. Scope of Services • The PhotoVoice Empowerment Project equips individuals with lived mental health and co-occurring experiences with the resources of photography and narrative in confronting internal and external stigma and overcoming prejudice and discrimination in the community. • The Wellness and Recovery Education for Acceptance, Choice and Hope (WREACH) Speakers’ Bureau develops individuals with lived mental health and co-occurring experiences to effectively present their recovery and resiliency stories in various formats to a wide range of audiences, such as health providers, academic faculty and students, law enforcement, and other community groups. • Staff lead and support the Committee for Social Inclusion. This is an alliance of community members and organizations that meet regularly to promote social inclusion of persons who use behavioral health services. The committee promotes dialogue and guides projects and initiatives designed to reduce stigma and discrimination, and increase inclusion and acceptance in the community. • Staff provides outreach and support to consumers and family members to enable them to actively participate in various committees and sub – committees throughout the system. These include the Mental Health Commission, the Consolidated Planning and Advisory W orkgroup and sub- committees, and Behavioral Health Integration planning efforts. Staff provides mentoring and instruction to consumers who wish to learn how to participate in community planning processes or to give public comments to advisory bodies. • Staff partner with NAMI Contra Costa certified facilitators to offer self-help groups for people diagnosed with mental illness who want to get support and share experiences in a safe environment. 3. Program: Mental Health Career Pathway Program June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 844 a. Scope of Services • The Mental Health Service Provider Individualized Recovery Intensive Training (SPIRIT) is a recovery-oriented peer led classroom and experientially based college accredited program that prepares individuals to become providers of service. Certification from this program is a requirement for many Community Support Worker positions in Contra Costa Behavioral Health. Staff provide instruction and administrative support, and provide ongoing support to graduates who are employed by the County. 4. Program: Overcoming Transportation Barriers – INN a. Scope of Services • The Overcoming Transportation Barriers program is a systemic approach to develop an effective consumer-driven transportation infrastructure that supports the entire mental health system of care. The goals of the program are to improve access to mental health services, improve public transit navigation, and improve independent living and self-management skills among consumers. The program targets consumers throughout the mental health system of care. b. Target Population: Consumers of public mental health services and their families; the general public. c. Total MHSA Funding for FY 2016-17: $682,985 d. Staff: 11 full-time equivalent staff positions. e. Outcomes: • Increased access to wellness and empowerment knowledge and skills by consumers of mental health services. • Decrease stigma and discrimination associated with mental illness. • Increased acceptance and inclusion of mental health consumers in all domains of the community. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 845 Older Adult Mental Health (Contra Costa Behavioral Health) Point of Contact: Heather Sweeten-Healy, LCSW, Mental Health Program Manager, Ellie Shirgul, PsyD, Mental Health Program Supervisor Contact Information: 2425 Bisso Lane, Suite 100, Concord, CA 94520, (925)-521-5620, Heather.Sweeten-Healy@hsd.cccounty.us, ellen.shirgul@hsd.cccounty.us 1. General Description of the Organization The Older Adult Mental Health Clinic is in the Adult System of Care and provides mental health services to Contra Costa’s senior citizens, including preventive care, linkage and outreach to under-served at risk communities, problem solving short- term therapy, and intensive care management for severely mentally ill individuals. 2. Program: Intensive Care Management Teams - CSS The Intensive Care Management Teams (ICMT) provides mental health services to older adults in their homes, in the community and within a clinical setting. Services are provided to Contra Costa County residents with serious psychiatric impairments who are 60 years of age or older. The program provides services to those who are insured through Medi-Cal, dually covered under Medi-Cal and MediCare, or uninsured. The primary goal of these teams is to support aging in place as well as to improve consumers’ mental health, physical health, prevent psychiatric hospitalization and placement in a higher level of care, and provide linkage to primary care appointments, community resources and events, and public transportation in an effort to maintain independence in the community. Additionally, the teams provide services to those who are homeless, living in shelters, or in residential care facilities. There are three multi-disciplinary Intensive Care Management Teams, one for each region of the county that increases access to resources throughout the county. 3. Program: Improving Mood Providing Access to Collaborative Treatment (IMPACT) - CSS IMPACT is an evidence-based practice which provides depression treatment to individuals age 55 and over in a primary care setting. The IMPACT model prescribes short-term (8 to 12 visits) Problem Solving Therapy and medication consultation with up to one year of follow-up as necessary. Services are provided by a treatment team consisting of licensed clinicians, psychiatrists, and primary care physicians in a primary care setting. The target population for the IMPACT Program is adults age 55 years and older who are at 300% or below of the Federal Poverty Level, are insured by Medi-Cal, Medi-Cal and MediCare, or are uninsured. The program focuses on treating older adults with late-life depression and co-occurring physical health impairments, such as cardio-vascular disease, diabetes, or chronic pain. The primary goals of the Impact Program are to prevent more severe psychiatric symptoms, assist clients in accessing community resources as needed, reducing stigma related to accessing mental health treatment and providing access to therapy to this underserved population. 4. Program: Senior Peer Counseling - PEI This program reaches out to isolated and mildly depressed older adults in their home environments and links them to appropriate community resources in a culturally June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 846 competent manner. Services are provided by Senior Peer Volunteers, who are trained and supervised by the Senior Peer Counseling Coordinators. Both the Latino and Chinese Senior Peer Counseling Programs are recognized as a resource for these underserved populations. This program serves older adults age 55 and older who are experiencing aging issues such as grief and loss, multiple health problems, loneliness, depression and isolation. Primary goals of this program are to prevent more severe psychiatric symptoms and loss of independence, reduce stigma related to seeking mental health services, and increase access to counseling services to these underserved populations. a. Target Population: Depending on program, Older Adults aged 55 or 60 years and older experiencing serious mental illness or at risk for developing a serious mental illness. b. Total Budget: Intensive Care Management - $2,995,707; IMPACT - $392,362; Senior Peer Counseling - $370,479. c. Staff: 26 Full time equivalent multi-disciplinary staff. d. Number served: For FY 15/16: ICMT served individuals; IMPACT served Individuals; Senior Peer Counseling Program trained and supported 40 volunteer Peers and served 120 individuals. e. Outcomes: Changes in Level of Care Utilization System (LOCUS) scores (Impact and ICM only), reductions in Psychiatric Emergency Service visits, reductions in hospitalizations, decreased Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) scores (Impact only), and reduced isolation, which is assessed by the PEARLS. 5. Program: Partners in Aging (Innovation) Partners in Aging is an Innovation Project that was implemented on September 1st, 2016. Partners in Aging adds up to two Community Support Workers, up to 3 Student Interns and 8 hours/week of Psychiatric Services to the IMPACT program. It is designed to increase the ability of the IMPACT program to reach out to underserved older adult populations through outreach at the Miller Wellness Center and Psychiatric Emergency Services. Through Partners in Aging, IMPACT will also be able to provide more comprehensive services, including providing linkage to Behavioral Health, Ambulatory Care, and Alcohol and Other Drugs services. Peer support, rehab, and in-home and in-community coaching will allow the skills learned through psychotherapy to be practiced in the community. Partners in Aging is also designed to provide SBIRT (Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment) services and referrals to IMPACT consumers who screen positive for alcohol or drug misuse. a. Scope of Services: Community Support Workers and Student Interns provide linkage, in-home and in-community peer support, and health/mental health coaching to consumers open to or referred to the IMPACT program. In addition, the CSW and Student Intern provide outreach to staff at Psychiatric Emergency Services and Miller Wellness Center. They are available to meet with consumers at PES and MWC that meet the criteria for IMPACT to provide outreach, and linkage to services. The Student Intern also is able to provide brief AOD June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 847 screening and referrals, as well as conducting intakes, assessments, and providing individual psychotherapy. Additionally, a Geropsychiatrist will be available 8 hours/week to provide consultation, and in-person evaluations of IMPACT clients. b. Target Population: The target population for the IMPACT Program is adults age 55 years and older who are insured by Medi-Cal, Medi-Cal and MediCare, or are uninsured. The program focuses on treating older adults with moderate to severe late-life depression or anxiety and co-occurring physical health impairments, such as cardio-vascular disease, diabetes, or chronic pain. Partners in Aging is also focused on providing outreach and services to older adults who are experiencing both mental health symptoms and alcohol or drug misuse. c. Annual Payment Limit: $250,000 d. Number served: It is estimated that Partners in Aging will serve approximately 50 to 75 consumers in its first year. IMPACT served 215 consumers in the FY 15/16, and it is estimated that around 25% of these consumers will require services from Partners in Aging staff. e. Outcomes: Reductions in Level of Care Utilization System (LOCUS) scores, reductions in Psychiatric Emergency Service visits, reductions in hospitalizations, and decreased Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) scores would indicate the effectiveness of this program. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 848 People Who Care (PWC) Children Association Point of Contact: Constance Russell Contact Information: 2231 Railroad Ave, Pittsburg, 94565 Ph: (925) 427-5037, Pwc.cares@comcast.net 1. General Description of the Organization People Who Care Children Association has provided educational, vocational and employment training programs to children ages 12 through 21 years old, since 2001. Many are at risk of dropping out of school and involved with, or highly at risk of entering, the criminal juvenile justice system. The mission of the organization is to empower children to become productive citizens by promoting educational and vocational opportunities, and by providing training, support and other tools needed to overcome challenging circumstances. 2. Program: PWC Afterschool Program (PEI) a. Scope of Services: Through its After-school Program, People Who Care (PWC) Children Association will provide Prevention services through providing work experience for 200 multicultural at-risk youth residing in the Pittsburg/Bay Point and surrounding East Contra Costa County communities, as well as, programs aimed at increasing educational success among those who are either at-risk of dropping out of school, or committing a repeat offense. Key activities include job training and job readiness training, mental health support and linkage to mental health counseling, as well as civic and community service activities. b. Target Population: At risk youth with special needs in East Contra Costa County. c. Payment Limit: $209,702 d. Number served: For FY 15/16: 191 e. Outcomes: • Participants in "Youth Green Jobs Training Program” increased their knowledge and skills related to entrepreneurship, alternative energy resources and technologies, and "Green Economy". • Participants of the "PWC After-School Program" showed improved youth resiliency factors (i.e., self-esteem, relationship, and engagement). • More than 50% of participants did not re-offend during the participation in the program • Participants in "PWC After-School Program" reported having a caring relationship with an adult in the community or at school. • 75% showed increase in school day attendance among "PWC After-School Program" participants. • 74% decrease in the number of school tardiness among "PWC After-School Program" participants. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 849 Portia Bell Hume Behavioral Health and Training Center Program: Community Support Program East Point of Contact: Chris Celio, PsyD, Program Manager Contact Information: 555 School Street, Pittsburg, CA 94565 (925) 481-4433, ccelio@humecenter.org Program: Community Support Program West Point of Contact: Miguel Hidalgo-Barnes, PsyD, Program Manager Contact Information: 3095 Richmond Pkwy #201, Richmond 94806 925-481-4412; mhidalgo-barnes@humecenter.org 1. General Description of the Organization The Hume Center is a Community Mental Health Center that provides high quality, culturally sensitive and comprehensive behavioral health care services and training. The agency strives to promote mental health, reduce disparities and psychological suffering, and strengthen communities and systems in collaboration with the people most involved in the lives of those served. We are committed to training behavioral health professionals to the highest standards of practice, while working within a culture of support and mutual respect. We provide a continuity of care in Contra Costa that includes prevention and early intervention, comprehensive assessment services, behavioral consultation services, outpatient psychotherapy and psychiatry, case management, Partial Hospitalization services, and Full Service Partnership Programs. 2. Program: Adult Full Service Partnership - CSS The Adult Full Service Partnership is a collaborative program that joins the resources of Hume Center and Contra Costa County Behavioral Health Services. a. Goal of the Program: • Prevent repeat hospitalizations • Transition from institutional settings • Attain and/or maintain medication compliance • Improve community tenure and quality of life • Attain and/or maintain housing stability • Attain self-sufficiency through vocational and educational support • Strengthen support networks, including family and community supports • Limit the personal impact of substance abuse on mental health recovery b. Referral, Admission Criteria, and Authorization: 1. Referral: To inquire about yourself or someone else receiving our Full Service Partnership Services in our Community Support Program (CSP) East program, please call our Pittsburg office at 925.432.4118. For services in our CSP West program, please contact our Richmond office at 510.778.2816. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 850 2. Admission Criteria: This program serves adult aged 26 to 59 who are diagnosed with severe mental illness and are: i. Frequent users of emergency services and/or psychiatric emergency services ii. Homeless or at risk of homelessness iii. Involved in the justice system or at risk of this iv. Have Medi-Cal insurance or are uninsured 3. Authorization: Referrals are approved by Contra Costa Behavioral Health Division. c. Scope of Services: Services will be provided using an integrated team approach called Community Support Program (CSP). Our services include: • Community outreach, engagement, and education to encourage participation in the recovery process and our program • Case management and resource navigation for the purposes of gaining stability and increasing self-sufficiency • Outpatient Mental Health Services, including services for individuals with co- occurring mental health & alcohol and other drug problems • Crisis Intervention, which is an immediate response to support a consumer to manage an unplanned event and ensure safety for all involved, which can include involving additional community resources • Collateral services, which includes family psychotherapy and consultation. These services help significant persons to understand and accept the consumer’s condition and involve them in service planning and delivery. • Medication support, including medication assessment and ongoing management (may also be provided by County Physician) • Housing support, including assisting consumers to acquire and maintain appropriate housing and providing skill building to support successful housing. When appropriate, assist consumers to attain and maintain MHSA subsidized housing. • Flexible funds are used to support consumer’s treatment goals. The most common use of flexible funds is to support housing placements through direct payment of deposit, first/last month’s rent, or unexpected expenses in order to maintain housing. • Vocational and Educational Preparation, which includes supportive services and psychoeducation to prepare consumers to return to school or work settings. This aims to return a sense of hope and trust in themselves to be able to achieve the goal while building the necessary skills, support networks, and structures/habits. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 851 • Recreational and Social Activities aim to assist consumers to decrease isolation while increasing self-efficacy and community involvement. The goal is to assist consumers to see themselves as members of the larger community and not marginalized by society or themselves. • Money Management, which is provided by a contract with Criss Cross Money Management, aims to increase stability for consumers who have struggled to manage their income. Services aim to increase money management skills to reduce the need for this service. • 24/7 Afterhours/Crisis Line is answered during non-office hours so that consumers in crisis can reach a staff member at any time. Direct services are provided on weekends and holidays as well. d. Target Population: Adults diagnosed with severe mental illness between the ages of 26 through 59 in East, Central and West County who are diagnosed with a serious mental illness, are at or below 300% of the federally defined poverty level, and are uninsured or receive Medi-Cal benefits. e. Payment Limit: For FY 15-16 (East and West CSP): $1,430,000 For FY 16-17 (East and West CSP): $1,966,077 f. Number served: For FY 15/16: 31 individuals (East); 60 existing FSPs transferred from Rubicon (West) in April of 2016. g. Outcomes: No outcomes data for the CSP West Program are included below, as the transition between Rubicon to Hume was completed in early 2016, however, the CSP West program will be reporting on similar outcome measures in the next MHSA Plan Update. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 852 Table 7. Pre- and post-enrollment utilization rates for 31 Hume East FSP participants enrolled in the FSP program during FY 15-16 No. pre- No. post- Rate pre- Rate post- %change enrollment enrollment enrollment enrollment PES episodes 206 168 0.556 0.459 -17.4 Inpatient episodes 36 18 0.096 0.048 -50 Inpatient days 399 397 1.07 1.06 -0.93 * Data on service utilization were collected from the county’s internal billing system, PSP. To assess the effect of FSP enrollment on PES presentations and inpatient episodes, this methodology compares clients’ monthly rates of service utilization pre-enrollment to clients’ post-enrollment service utilization rates. Using PES usage as an example, the calculations used to assess pre- and post-enrollment utilization rates can be expressed as: (No. of PES episodes during pre- enrollment period)/ (No. of months in pre- enrollment period) =Pre-enrollment monthly PES utilization rate (No. of PES episodes during post-enrollment period)/ (No. of months in post- enrollment period) =Post-enrollment monthly PES utilization rate June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 853 Primary Care Clinic Behavioral Health Support (Contra Costa Behavioral Health) Point of Contact Anita De Vera, Mental Health Program Manager, Betsy Orme, Mental Health Program Manager Contact Information: 2523 El Portal Drive, San Pablo, CA 94806, (510)-215-3700, 2500 Alhambra Ave, Martinez (925) 370-5000 Anita.Devera@hsd.cccounty.us besty.Orme@hsd.cccounty.us 1. General Description of the Organization Behavioral health clinicians staff the county Primary Care Health Centers in Martinez and Richmond. The goal is to integrate primary and behavioral health care. Two mental health clinicians are part of a multi-disciplinary team with the intent to provide timely and integrated response to those at risk, and/or to prevent the onset of serious mental health functioning among adults visiting the clinic for medical reasons. 2. Plan Element: Clinic Support - PEI a. Scope of Services: Perform brief mental health assessment and intervention with adults, children, and their families. Provide short term case management, mental health services, individual and family support, crisis intervention, triage, coordination of care between primary care and Behavioral Health Services. Tasks also include linkage to schools, probation, social services and community services and lead groups at County Primary Care Center. b. Target Population: Adults in central and West county, who present at the clinic for medical reasons c. Number served by clinic: For FY 15/16: 200+. d. Outcomes: Improve overall health for individuals through decrease medical visit and increase coping with life situations. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 854 Putman Clubhouse Point of Contact: Tamara Hunter, Clubhouse Director; Molly Hamaker, Executive Director Contact Information: 3024 Willow Pass Rd #230, Concord CA 94519; 925-691-4276; www.putnamclubhouse.org; Tamara: 510-926-0474, tamara@putnamclubhouse.org; Molly: 925-708-6488, molly@putnamclubhouse.org 1. General Description of the Organization Putnam Clubhouse provides a safe, welcoming place, where participants (called members), recovering from mental illness, build on personal strengths instead of focusing on illness. Members work as colleagues with peers and a small staff to maintain recovery and prevent relapse through work and work-mediated relationships. Members learn vocational and social skills while doing everything involved in running The Clubhouse. 2. Program: Preventing Relapse of Individuals in Recovery - PEI a. Scope of Services: i. Project Area A: Putnam Clubhouse’s peer-based programming helps adults recovering from psychiatric disorders access support networks, social opportunities, wellness tools, employment, housing, and health services. The work-ordered day program helps members gain prevocational, social, and healthy living skills as well as access vocational options within Contra Costa. The Clubhouse teaches skills needed for navigating/accessing the system of care, helps members set goals (including educational, vocational, and wellness), provides opportunities to become involved in stigma reduction and advocacy. Ongoing community outreach is provided throughout the County via presentations and by distributing materials, including a brochure in both English and Spanish. The Clubhouse hosts Career Corner, an online career resource blog for mental health consumers in Contra Costa. The Young Adult Initiative provides weekly activities and programming planned by younger adult members to attract and retain younger adult members in the under-30 age group. Putnam Clubhouse helps increase family wellness and reduces stress related to caregiving by providing respite through Clubhouse programming and by helping Clubhouse members improve their independence. ii. Project Area B: Putnam Clubhouse assists the Office for Consumer Empowerment (OCE) in developing a new, comprehensive peer and family-member training program in Contra Costa County that will expand upon the existing SPIRIT courses and prepare students to be certified as peer and family providers in California. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 855 iii. Project Area C: Putnam Clubhouses assists the Department of County Mental Health in a number of other projects, including organizing community events and the administering consumer perception surveys. b. Target Population: Contra Costa County residents with identified mental illness and their families. c. Payment Limit: $549,402. d. Number served: For FY 15/16: 314 members. e. Outcomes: • 74 new members enrolled; 23 were young adults ages 18-25 years. • 85% of family members who completed a survey reported that Clubhouse activities and programs provided them with respite care and 96% reported a high level of satisfaction with Clubhouse activities and programs. • 90% of family members of program participants and 86% of members completing the annual survey reported that the member’s independence increased; 90% of members completing the survey reported an increase in peer contacts. • 90% of members & caregivers completing the annual survey reported an increase in mental, physical, and emotional well-being • 90% of members using career services were “very satisfied” or “satisfied” with the services related to employment and education. • Members began and/or sustained paid employment with Clubhouse support. • Members received support starting and/or continuing school attendance. • Members experienced a significant decrease in hospitalizations/re- hospitalizations and out-of-home placements • 2016 SPIRIT graduation coordinated by the Clubhouse. • Consumer holiday party in December coordinated by the Clubhouse in collaboration with multiple agencies, including OCE. • The Clubhouse administered the MHSIP consumer surveys for two separate weeks at area clinics under the supervision of Contra Costa Mental Health. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 856 Rainbow Community Center (RCC) Point of Contact: Ben-David Barr Contact Information: 2118 Willow Pass Rd, Concord, CA 94520. (925) 692-0090, Ben@rainbowcc.org 1. General Description of the Organization The Rainbow Community Center of Contra Costa County (RCC) builds community and promotes well-being among Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, and Questioning (LGBTQ) people and our allies. Services are the main office in Concord and in East and West County in locations by arrangement with partner organizations. 2. Programs: A.) Outpatient Behavioral Health and Training (INN), B.) Community-based Prevention and Early Intervention (PEI) a. Scope of Services: i. Outpatient Services: RCC works with LGBTQ mental health consumers to develop a healthy and un-conflicted self-concept by providing individual, group, couples, and family counseling, as well as case management and linkage/brokerage services. Services are available in English, Spanish, and Portuguese. Onsite translation support is available in Vietnamese. ii. Pride and Joy: Three tiered prevention and early intervention model. Tier One: outreach to hidden groups, isolation reduction and awareness building. Tier Two: Support groups and services for clients with identified mild to moderate mental health needs. Tier Three: Identification and linkage of clients with high levels of need and who require system navigation support. Services are aimed at underserved segments of the LGBTQ community (seniors, people living with HIV, and community members with unrecognized health and mental health disorders). iii. Youth Development: Three tiered services (see above) aimed at LGBTQ youth as a particularly vulnerable population. Programming focuses on building resiliency against rejection and bullying, promoting healthy LBGTQ identity, and identifying and referring youth in need of higher levels of care. Services are provided on-site and at local schools. iv. Inclusive Schools: Community outreach and training involving school leaders, staff, parents, CBO partners, faith leaders and students to build acceptance of LGBTQ youth in Contra Costa County schools, families, and faith communities. b. Target Population: LGBTQ community of Contra Costa County who are at risk of developing serious mental illness. c. Payment Limit: $495,267 for Innovation program; $227,120 for PEI including counseling and case management services onsite and at Contra Costa schools); June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 857 d. Number served: For FY 15/16: 1) Behavioral Health Services: 286. 2) PEI total served is 1053 participants with the following breakdowns: Pride and Joy: 804 in-person participants (includes 105 LGBTQ seniors and 80 HIV+ people); 3) Youth Development: 380 participants (including 178 on school sites); 4) Inclusive Schools: is measured in numbers of school sites supported, trainings offered, and school policies developed. Over 4000 community members receive health promotion messages and mental health resources via Rainbow’s Facebook page, and 2000 households via RCC’s bi-monthly newsletter. e. Outcomes: i. Outpatient Clinic:  286 individuals received one on one services (counseling and case management programs)  Cultural competency trainings were provided to over 11 adult mental health providers, including county clinics  15 behavioral health interns completed RCC’s clinical training program in FY16 ii. Prevention and Early Intervention/Pride and Joy:  Over half of program participants indicated an increase in people they could talk to if they had a problem. Nearly two thirds self- reported better mental health.  RCC identified at least 98 adult individuals in need of higher level of care and provided navigation support  RCC hosted senior lunches two times per month with 30 to 40 participants each lunch and over 750 meals served iii. Youth Development:  Over 70% of youth participants reported that the program helped them with having supports to turn to in a crisis. Over 80% of participants reported the program helped them come out to friends and family.  ·Events and trainings promoted youth leadership, including a “Build Your Own Gay Straight Alliance” workshop for middle school students and a youth-led “Pride Palooza” event for families and peers iv. Inclusive Schools:  Nine trainings were delivered to over 100 providers at youth-serving organizations, including Mt. Diablo Unified School District, county children’s clinics, and community-based youth organizations  Welcoming Schools and Communities Summit was held in Central County - more than 80 parents, youth and faith leaders attended the one day event and learned strategies to create more welcoming environments for LGBTQ youth. Workshops included “Spiritual Trauma and Mental Health Among LGBTQ People”, “Exploring Identity Development with LGBTQI+ and Ally Youth”, “How Can I Help? Addressing the Emotional and Mental Health Needs of Trans June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 858 and Gender Nonconforming Youth” and “Now What? Taking Steps Towards Accepting and Inclusive Schools”  Post-summit surveys showed that adult participants felt better prepared to support LGBTQ youth. They also indicated they were likely to implement a new policy or practice they learned about at the event. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 859 RI International Inc. (formerly known as Recovery Innovations) Point of Contact: April Langro, Recovery Services Administrator Contact Information: 3701 Lone Tree Way Antioch, Ca. 94509 2975 Treat Blvd. C-8 Concord, Ca. 94518 2101 Vale Rd. #300 San Pablo, Ca. 94806 (925)494-4008, April.Langro@riinternational.com 1. General Description of the Organization Founded by Eugene Johnson in 1990 as META Services, an Arizona non-profit corporation, RI International developed and provided a range of traditional mental health and substance abuse services for adults with long term mental health and addiction challenges. In 1999, RI International began pioneering an innovative initiative: the creation of the new discipline of Peer Support Specialist. Now, 18 years later, this experience has transformed the RI International workforce to one in which Peer Support Specialists and professionals work together on integrated teams to deliver recovery-based services. The RI International experience had a global impact on the mental health field serving as a demonstration that recovery from mental illness and/or addiction is possible. Based on this transformation experience, RI International operates recovery-based mental health services in 21 communities in five states and New Zealand and has provided recovery training and transformation consultation in 27 states and five countries abroad. 2. Program: RI International Wellness and Recovery Centers – CSS RI International provides Adult Wellness Cities that serve individuals experiencing mental and/or behavioral health challenges in West, Central and East County. Wellness Cities provide a variety of wellness and recovery-related classes and groups, one-on-one coaching, vocational opportunities, links to community resources, and recreational opportunities in a peer supported environment. The classes, groups and coaching are recovery-oriented and facilitated by peer recovery coaches. Coaches work with citizens to establish individualized goals, wellness recovery action plans (WRAP), self-help and coping skills, support networks and a commitment to overall wellness. All services provided are related to at least one of the nine dimensions of wellness; social, intellectual, spiritual, physical, emotional, occupations, home and community living, financial, and finally recreation and leisure. Participants seeking services become “Citizens” of the city. Citizens develop a 6 month partnership with RI International and are assigned a peer Recovery Coach who has experienced their own success in recovery by obtaining education, coping skills, self-management and/or sobriety. They share what they have learned and walk alongside each citizen on their individualized and strength-based path to recovery. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 860 a. Scope of Services: • Peer and Family Support • Personal Recovery Planning using the seven steps of Recovery Coaching • Workshops, Education Classes, Support Groups and Community-Based Activities • Vocational Opportunities – Citizen Contributor Program • Community Outreach and Collaboration with Mental Health Partners and Providers – NAMI, HUME, WET team, Project Homeless Connect, WREACH, SPIRIT, CORE, etc. • Links to Resources - Assist participants to coordinate medical, mental health, medication, housing, and other community services • Wellness Recovery Action Plan (WRAP) classes • SPIRIT Program – obtain attendance records from the OCE and process reimbursement (stipend) for students. • Lunch, AM and PM snacks for participants b. Target Population: Adult mental health participants in Contra Costa County. Recovery Innovations services will be delivered within each region of the county through Wellness and Recovery Centers located in Antioch, Concord and San Pablo. c. Annual MHSA Payment Limit: $901,250 d. Number served: FY 15/16: 451 (217 are active, regular participants) e. Outcomes: 34% of citizens who attend one WRAP class complete the class, 37% who attended one WELL class completed the class, 34% of those who attend one Facing Up to Health class completed the class, and 34% of those who attend one “My Personal Wellness Plan” completed the class. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 861 Resource Development Associates Point of Contact: Roberta Chambers Contact Information: 230 4th Street, Oakland, CA 94607 (510) 488-4345 rchambers@resourcedevelopment.net 1. General Description of the Organization Resource Development Associates (RDA) has over thirty years of experience evaluating complex and multi-systems initiatives within California’s mental health system as well as evaluation that explores the intersection between the mental health and justice systems. Through these experiences, we have researched and developed numerous strategies and practices related to: a collaborative approach to evaluation; supporting new programs during the formative phase as well as existing programs with evaluation implementation; timely and ongoing reporting of data for continuous quality improvement and compliance; and outcome measurement that helps counties and programs understand individual, program, and systems level outcomes. For this evaluation, we seek to explore not only what the programs are achieving in terms of outcomes but also how the programs are achieving the observed results. 2. Program: Assisted Outpatient Treatment (AOT) Program Evaluation - CSS Resource Development Associates will 1) design and implement a program evaluation that determines the difference, if any, in program impact and cost savings to the County for individuals who are ordered to participate in behavioral health services versus those individuals who voluntarily participate in the same level and type of services, and 2) provide a comprehensive report to the County and the State Department of Health Care Services on or before May 1st of each contract year. The variables for reporting are detailed in Welfare and Institutions Code Section 5348(d) (1-14), and require both quantitative and qualitative variables (including conducting interviews with behavioral health consumers and their families). a. Scope of Services: The total study period will be three years, with three cohorts representing the above groups established. Individuals will be matched by age, gender, race/ethnicity, diagnoses, level of severity of psychiatric disability, income level, and length of active participation in the program. For program and fiscal impact, cohorts will be compared at pre- and post-program intervention on the performance and cost indicators of 1) change in level of functioning, to include successful step down to lower levels of care, 2) number and cost of psychiatric crises interventions, such as the County’s Psychiatric Emergency Service (PES), 3) days and cost of psychiatric hospital confinement (State and/or local) and incarceration, 4) incidence of engagement in significant, meaningful participation in the community, 5) engagement in conservatorship, and 6) return to previous level of functioning prior to AOT intervention (recidivism). For cost June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 862 savings, cohorts will be compared at pre- and post-program intervention on County dollars spent on each cohort. b. Target Population: Adults diagnosed with serious mental illness and co- occurring substance abuse disorders, who a) establish an AOT court settlement agreement, b) are court-ordered to receive these services, or c) meet the criteria for FSP services and agree to voluntarily accept services as provided by Mental Health Systems, Inc. and in partnership with Contra Costa Behavioral Health Services. c. MHSA Payment Limit: For FY 15-16: $ 101, 875; For FY 16-17: $99,375 d. Outcomes: RDA seeks to answer the following overarching questions related to the implementation of Assisted Outpatient Treatment/Assertive Community Treatment: • How faithful are ACT services to the ACT model? • What are the outcomes for people who participate in AOT, including the DHCS required outcomes? • What are the differences in demographics, service patterns, psychosocial outcomes, and cost between those who agree to participate in ACT services without court involvement and those who participate with an AOT court order or voluntary settlement agreement? • What are the differences in demographics, service utilization, psychosocial outcomes, and cost between those who engage in existing full service partnership services and those who receive ACT services? June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 863 RYSE Center Point of Contact: Kanwarpal Dhaliwal Contact Information: 205 41st Street, Richmond. CA 94805 (925) 374-3401 Kanwarpal@rysecenter.org http://www.rysecenter.org/ 1. General Description of the Organization RYSE is a youth center in Richmond that offers a wide range of activities, programs, and classes for young people including media arts, health education, career and educational support, and youth leadership and advocacy. RYSE operates within a community Behavioral health model and employs trauma informed and healing centered approaches in all areas of engagement, including one-on-one, group and larger community efforts. In these areas, RYSE focuses on the conditions, impact, and strategies to name and address community distress, stigma, and mental health inequities linked to historical trauma and racism, as well as complex, chronic trauma. This focus enables RYSE to provide culturally relevant, empathetic, and timely community mental health and wellness services, resources, and supports across all our program areas and levels of engagement. 2. Program: Supporting Youth - PEI. a. Scope of Services: i. Trauma Response and Resilience System (TRRS): develop and implement Trauma and Healing Learning Series for key system partners, facilitate development of a coordinated community response to violence and trauma, evaluate impact of trauma informed practice, provide critical response and crisis relief for young people experiencing acute incidents of violence (individual, group, and community-wide). ii. Health and Wellness: support young people (ages 13 to 21) from the diverse communities of West County to become better informed (health services) consumers and active agents of their own health and wellness, support young people in expressing and addressing the impact of stigma, discrimination, and community distress; and foster healthy peer and youth- adult relationships. Activities include mental health counseling and referrals, outreach to schools, workshops and ‘edutainment’ activities that promote inclusion, healing, and justice, youth assessment and implementation of partnership plans (Chat it Up Plans). iii. Inclusive Schools: Facilitate collaborative work with West Contra Costa schools and organizations working with and in schools aimed at making WCCUSD an environment free of stigma, discrimination, and isolation for LGBTQ students. Activities include assistance in provision of LGBT specific services, conducting organizational assessments, training for adults and students, engaging students in leadership activities, and providing support groups at target schools, etc. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 864 b. Target Population: West County Youth at risk for developing serious mental illness. c. Payment Limit: FY 15-16: $474,144 d. Unique Number served: For FY 15/16: 408 youths e. Outcomes: iv. Trauma and Resilience • RYSE Youth Restorative Justice (formerly Justice Project) served young people through probation referrals, community service, juvenile hall workshops and/or presentations, and drop-in programming • 90% of total number of youth involved in the Youth Restorative Justice Project reported increased and/or strong sense of self-efficacy, hope, and community engagement • Participants in each session report increased understanding of trauma- informed youth development. • 200 stakeholders and 87 organizations participated in Trauma and Healing Learning Series local sessions. v. Health and Wellness/Youth Development • Members will complete wellness plans • Members will participate in at least 2 program activities aimed at supporting healthy peer relationships, community engagement, and leadership • RYSE youth members will report positively on indicators of social- emotional well-being such as increased feelings of hope, control over their lives, and a sense of stability and safety, and reduced feelings of isolation. • 100% of RYSE staff (youth and adults) were trained to utilize RYSE social media as a means to address stigma and inequity, elevate stories of resiliency, and foster peer-lead/consumer-lead information sharing and education around mental health issues impacting young people in West Contra Costa County vi. Inclusive Schools • Youth members who identify as LGBTQQ report positive sense of self- efficacy, positive peer relations, youth-adult relations, and agency consistent with all survey respondents (see above). • Stakeholders involved in the Inclusive Schools Coalition (renamed West Contra Costa LGBTQQ Youth Advocacy Network) will report increased understanding of the priorities and needs of LGBTQ youth and their peers. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 865 Seneca Family of Agencies Point of Contact: Jessica Donohue, Program Director Contact Information: 2351 Olivera Road, Concord, CA, 94520, (925) 808–8724, jessica_donohue@senecacenter.org 1. General Description of the Organization Seneca Center for Children and Families is a leading innovator in the field of community-based and family-based service options for emotionally troubled children and their families. With a continuum of care ranging from intensive residential treatment, to in-home wraparound services, to public school-based services, Seneca is one of the premier children’s mental health agencies in Northern California. 2. Program: Short Term Assessment of Resources and Treatment (START) - Full Service Partnership - CSS Seneca Family of Agencies (SFA) provides an integrated, coordinated service to youth who frequently utilize crisis services, and may be involved in the child welfare and/or juvenile justice system. START provides three to six months of short term intensive services to stabilize the youth in their community, and to connect them and their families with sustainable resources and supports. The goals of the program are to 1) reduce the need to utilize crisis services, and the necessity for out-of-home and emergency care for youth enrolled in the program, 2) maintain and stabilize the youth in the community by assessing the needs of the family system, identifying appropriate community resources and supports, and ensuring their connection with sustainable resources and supports, and 3) successfully link youth and family with formal services and informal supports in their neighborhood, school and community. a. Scope of Services: • Outreach and engagement • Linkage • Assessment • Case management • Plan development • Crisis Intervention • Collateral • Flexible funds • Contractor must be available to consumer on 24/7 basis b. Target Population: The target population for the program includes youth 18 years and under with a history of multiple psychiatric hospitalizations and crisis interventions, imminent risk of homelessness, who have a serious mental illness and/or are seriously emotionally disturbed, and are not being served, or are being underserved, by the current mental health system. Youth in the program can be Medi-Cal eligible or uninsured. c. Payment Limit: $ 562,915 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 866 d. Number served: Number served in FY 15/16 -- Total 103: West 35, Central 23, and East 45 e. Outcomes: • Reduction in incidence of psychiatric crisis • Reduction of the incidence of restriction Table 8. Pre-and post-enrollment utilization rates for 101 Seneca Start FSP Participants enrolled in the FSP program during FY 15-16 No. pre- No. post- Rate pre- Rate post- %change enrollment enrollment enrollment enrollment PES episodes 124 29 0.143 0.033 -76.9 Inpatient episodes 21 6 0.028 0.007 -75 Inpatient days 142 26 0.194 0.027 -86.0 * Data on service utilization were collected from the county’s internal billing system, PSP. To assess the effect of FSP enrollment on PES presentations and inpatient episodes, this methodology compares clients’ monthly rates of service utilization pre-enrollment to clients’ post-enrollment service utilization rates. Using PES usage as an example, the calculations used to assess pre- and post-enrollment utilization rates can be expressed as: (No. of PES episodes during pre- enrollment period)/ (No. of months in pre- enrollment period) =Pre-enrollment monthly PES utilization rate (No. of PES episodes during post-enrollment period)/ (No. of months in post- enrollment period) =Post-enrollment monthly PES utilization rate June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 867 Shelter, Inc. Point of Contact: John Eckstrom, Chief Executive Officer. Contact Information: 1333 Willow Pass Rd. Suite 206, CA, 94520, (925) 957-7595, john@shelterinc.org 1. General Description of the Organization The mission of Shelter, Inc. is to prevent and end homelessness for low-income residents of Contra Costa County by providing resources that lead to self-sufficiency. Shelter, Inc. was founded in 1986 to alleviate the County's homeless crisis, and its work encompasses three main elements: 1) prevent the onset of homelessness, including rental assistance, case management, and housing counseling services, 2) ending the cycle of homelessness by providing 3 to 24 months of housing in combination with supportive services, such as job training, educational services, health care, and counseling, and 3) providing affordable housing for nearly 250 low- income households, including such special needs groups as transition-age youth, people with HIV/AIDS, and those with mental health disabilities. 2. Program: Supportive Housing - CSS Shelter, Inc. provides a master leasing program, in which adults or children and their families are provided tenancy in apartments and houses throughout the County. Through a combination of self-owned units and agreements with landlords Shelter, Inc. acts as the lessee to the owners and provides staff to support individuals and their families move in and maintain their homes independently. Housing and rental subsidy services are provided to residents of the County who are homeless and that have been certified by Contra Costa Behavioral Health as eligible. This project is committed to providing housing opportunities that provide low barriers to obtaining housing that is affordable, safe and promotes independence to MHSA consumers. a. Scope of Services. • Provide services in accordance with the State of California Mental Health Service Act Housing Program, the County Behavioral Health Mental Health Division’s Work Plan, all State, Federal and Local Fair Housing Laws and Regulations, and the State of California’s Landlord and Tenants Laws. • Provide consultation and technical support to Contra Costa Behavioral Health with regard to services provided under the housing services and rental subsidy program. • Utilize existing housing units already on the market to provide immediate housing to consumers through master leasing and tenant based services. • Acquire and maintain not less than 120 master-leased housing units throughout Contra Costa County. • Negotiate lease terms and ensure timely payment of rent to landlords. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 868 • Leverage housing resources through working relationships with owners of affordable housing within the community. • Integrate innovative practices to attract and retain landlords and advocate on behalf of consumers. • Leverage other rental subsidy programs including, but not limited to, Shelter Plus Care and Section 8. • Reserve or set aside units of owned property dedicated for MHSA consumers. • Ensure condition of leased units meet habitability standards by having Housing Quality Standard (HQS) trained staff conduct unit inspections prior to a unit being leased and annually as needed. • Establish maximum rent level to be subsidized with MHSA funding to be Fair Market Rent (FMR) as published by US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for Contra Costa County in the year that the unit is initially rented or meeting rent reasonableness utilizing the guidelines established by HUD and for each year thereafter. • Provide quality property management services to Consumers living in master leased and owned properties. • Maintain property management systems to track leases, occupancy, and maintenance records. • Maintain an accounting system to track rent and security deposit charges and payments. • Conduct annual income re-certifications to ensure consumer rent does not exceed 30% of income minus utility allowance. The utility allowance used shall be in accordance with the utility allowances established by the prevailing Housing Authority for the jurisdiction that the housing unit is located in. • Provide and/or coordinate with outside contractors and Shelter, Inc. maintenance staff for routine maintenance and repair services and provide after-hours emergency maintenance services to consumers. • Ensure that landlords adhere to habitability standards and complete major maintenance and repairs. • Process and oversee evictions for non-payment of rent, criminal activities, harmful acts upon others, and severe and repeated lease violations. • Work collaboratively with full service partnerships and/or County Mental Health Staff around housing issues and provide referrals to alternative housing options. • Attend collaborative meetings, mediations and crisis interventions to support consumer housing retention. • Provide tenant education to consumers to support housing retention. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 869 b. Target Population: Consumers eligible for MHSA services. The priority is given to those who are homeless or imminently homeless and otherwise eligible for the full service partnership programs. c. Annual Payment Limit: $2,281,484. d. Number served: For FY 14/15: Shelter, Inc. served 117 consumers. FY 15/16 Target: 117 consumers. e. Outcomes: Shelter, Inc. will report on the following outcomes in future MHSA Plans. • Quality of life: housing stability. The outcomes are being revised to take into account unforeseen changes in FSP service provision. o FORMER GOAL: 80% of MHSA Consumers residing in master leased housing shall remain stably housed for 24 months or longer. FY 14/15, 68% of MHSA Consumers residing in master leased housing remained stably housed for 24 months or longer (Note: SHELTER, Inc. was awarded a contract expansion in February 2014 which increased capacity from 109 to 120. The addition of new Consumers to housing during the second half of the contract year had an impact on this outcome. At the time of the contract expansion the number served was 101. A major change occurred in the Adult FSP programs; the Bridges to Home collaboration ended and Rubicon Programs closed its Central Contra County office and stopped sending referrals for vacant housing. Some Consumers graduated from the FSP programs and no longer qualified for Clinic based Mental Health case management because their symptoms improved. Some Consumers were solely receiving medication management through County Mental Health Clinics. The reduction in case management support resulted in some Consumers not being able to maintain their housing. Several new FSP Providers were brought in and referrals for housing resumed late in the last quarter which all had an impact on this outcome. REVISED GOAL: 70% of MHSA Consumers residing in master leased housing shall remain stably housed for 18 months or longer This outcome is being revised taking into account a higher than expected number of newly housed Consumers due to the contract expansion. Additionally there are Consumers who have graduated from their FSP, and/or are receiving light case management, and/or June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 870 are receiving medication management from a County Mental Health Clinics. All of these factors impact housing retention. o FORMER GOAL: 90% of MHSA Consumers residing in Shelter, Inc. owned property shall remain stably housed for 16 months or longer. FY 14/15 71% of MHSA Consumers residing in SHELTER, Inc. owned housing remained stably housed for 16 months or longer. The Bridges to Home FSP collaborative dissolved and Rubicon Programs closed its Central Contra County office which had an impact on consumers living in Central and East County where a majority of SHELTER, Inc. owned properties were set aside for MHSA Consumers. REVISED GOAL: 70% of MHSA Consumers residing in Shelter, Inc. owned property shall remain stably housed for 12 months or longer. This outcome has been revised taking into account that the a majority of the new housing placements in SHELTER, Inc. owned properties occurred at the later part of the contract year in 2014. Additionally, new FSP programs with differing service models have impacted housing retention. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 871 STAND! For Families Free of Violence Point of Contact: Sharon Turner Contact Information: 1410 Danzig Plaza #220, Concord, Ca 94520 SharonT@standffov.org, rubys@standffov.org 1. General Description of the Organization STAND! For Families Free of Violence is a provider of comprehensive domestic violence and child abuse services in Contra Costa County, offering prevention, intervention, and treatment programs. STAND! builds safe and strong families through early detection, enhanced support services, community prevention and education, and empowerment to help individuals rebuild their lives. STAND! enlist the efforts of local residents, organizations and institutions, all of whom are partners in ending family violence. STAND! is a founding member of the "Zero Tolerance for Domestic Violence Initiative", a cross-sector organization working for fifteen years to help end domestic violence, sexual assault and children exposed to violence. 2. Program: “Expect Respect” and “You Never Win With Violence” - PEI. a. Scope of Services: STAND! provides services to address the effects of teen dating violence/domestic violence and help maintain healthy relationships for at- risk youth throughout Contra Costa County. STAND! uses two evidence-based, best-practice programs: “Expect Respect” and “You Never Win with Violence” to directly affect the behaviors of youth to prevent future violence and enhance positive mental health outcomes for students already experiencing teen dating violence. Primary prevention activities include educating middle and high school youth about teen dating through the ‘You Never Win with Violence’ curriculum, and providing school personnel, service providers and parents with knowledge and awareness of the scope and causes of dating violence. The program strives to increase knowledge and awareness of the tenets of a healthy adolescent dating relationship. Secondary prevention activities include supporting youths experiencing, or at-risk for, teen dating violence by conducting 20 gender-based, 15-week support groups. Each school site has a system for referring youth to the support groups. As a result of these service activities, youth experiencing, or youth who are at-risk for, teen dating violence will demonstrate an increased knowledge of 1)the difference between healthy and unhealthy teen dating relationships, 2) an increased sense of belonging to positive peer groups, 3) an enhanced understanding that violence does not have to be “normal”, and 4) an increased knowledge of their rights and responsibilities in a dating relationship. b. Target Population: Middle and high school students at risk of dating violence. c. Payment Limit: $126,415 d. Number served: For FY 15/16 : 2143 participants e. Outcomes: • 241 participated in “Expect Respect” in nine groups at six sites. • 18 youth leaders trained. • 78 adults were trained on the dynamics of teen dating violence including how to identify it, how to be an advocated for youth experiencing any kind of violence and how to refer youth to appropriate services. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 872 Telecare Corporation Point of Contact: Clearnise Bullard, Program Administrator Jim Christopher, Clinical Director Contact Information: 300 Ilene Street, Martinez, CA 94553, (925) 313-7980 cbullard@telecarecorp.com, jchristopher@telecarecorp.com 1. General Description of the Organization Telecare Corporation was established in 1965 in the belief that persons with mental illness are best able to achieve recovery through individualized services provided in the least restrictive setting possible. Today, they operate over 100 programs staffed by more than 2,500 employees in California, Oregon, Washington, Arizona, Nebraska, North Carolina, Texas, New Mexico and Pennsylvania and provide a broad continuum of services and supports, including Inpatient Acute Care, Inpatient Non-Acute/Sub-Acute Care, Crisis Services, Residential Services, Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) services, Case Management and Prevention services. 2. Program: Hope House Crisis Residential Facility - CSS Telecare Corporation operates Hope House, a voluntary, highly structured 16-bed Short-Term Crisis Residential Facility (CRF) for adults between the ages of 18 and 59. Hope House is serves individuals who require crisis support to avoid hospitalization, or are discharging from the hospital or long-term locked facilities and need step-down care to transition back to community living. The focus is client- centered and recovery-focused, and underscores the concept of personal responsibility for the resident's illness and independence. The program supports a social rehabilitation model, which is designed to enhance an individual's social connection with family and community so that they can move back into the community and prevent a hospitalization. Services are recovery based, and tailored to the unique strengths of each individual resident. The program offers an environment where residents have the power to make decisions and are supported as they look at their own life experiences, set their own paths toward recovery, and work towards the fulfillment of their hopes and dreams. Telecare’s program is designed to enhance client motivation to actively participate in treatment, provide clients with intensive assistance in accessing community resources, and assist clients develop strategies to maintain independent living in the community and improve their overall quality of life. The program’s service design draws on evidence- based practices such as Wellness Action and Recovery Planning (WRAP), motivational interviewing, and integrated treatment for co-occurring disorders. a. Scope of Services: • Individualized assessments, including, but not limited to, psychosocial skills, reported medical needs/health status, social supports, and current functional limitations within 72 hours of admission. • Psychiatric assessment within 24 hours of admission. • Treatment plan development with 72 hours of admission. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 873 • Therapeutic individual and group counseling sessions on a daily basis to assist clients in developing skills that enable them to progress towards self- sufficiency and to reside in less intensive levels of care. • Crisis intervention and management services designed to enable the client to cope with the crisis at hand, maintaining functioning status in the community, and prevent further decompensation or hospitalization. • Medication support services, including provision of medications, as clinically appropriate, to all clients regardless of funding; individual and group education for consumers on the role of medication in their recovery plans, medication choices, risks, benefits, alternatives, side effects and how these can be managed; supervised self-administration of medication based on physician’s order by licensed staff; medication follow-up visit by a psychiatrist at a frequency necessary to manage the acute symptoms to allow the client to safely stay at the Crisis Residential Program, and to prepare the client to transition to outpatient level of care upon discharge. • Co-occurring capable interventions for substance use following a harm reduction modality in addition to weekly substance abuse group meetings as well as availability of weekly AA and NA meetings in the community. • Weekly life skills groups offered to develop and enhance skills needed to manage supported independent and independent living in the community. • A comprehensive weekly calendar of activities, including physical, recreational, social, artistic, therapeutic, spiritual, dual recovery, skills development and outings. • Peer support services/groups offered weekly. • Engagement of family in treatment, as appropriate. • Assessments for involuntary hospitalization, when necessary. • Discharge planning and assisting clients with successful linkage to community resources, such as outpatient mental health clinics, substance abuse treatment programs, housing, full service partnerships, physical health care, and benefits programs. • Follow-up with client and their mental health service provider following discharge to ensure that appropriate linkage has been successful. • Daily provision of meals and snacks for residents. • Transportation to services and activities provided in the community, as well as medical and court appointments, if the resident’s case manager or county worker is unavailable, as needed. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 874 b. Target Population: Adults ages 18 to 59 who require crisis support to avoid psychiatric hospitalization, or are discharging from the hospital or long-term locked facilities and need step-down care to transition back to community living. c. Payment Limit: FY 16/17: $2,077,530.00 d. Number served: Number to be served yearly: 200. Hope House served 193 clients in FY 15/16. e. Outcomes: • Reduction in severity of psychiatric symptoms: Discharge at least 90% of clients to a lower level of care. • Consumer Satisfaction: Maintain an overall client satisfaction score of at least 4.0 out of 5.0. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 875 United Family Care, LLC (Family Courtyard) Point of Contact: Juliana Taburaza. Contact Information: 2840 Salesian Avenue, Richmond CA, 94804. (510) 235-8284, JuTaburaza@gmail.com 1. General Description of the Organization The County contracts with United Family Care, LLC (Family Courtyard), a licensed board and care provider, to provide additional staff care to enable those with serious mental illness to avoid institutionalization and enable them to live in the community. 2. Program: Augmented Board and Care Housing Services - CSS a. Scope of Services: Augmented residential services, including but not limited to: • medication management • nutritional meal planning • assistance with laundry • transportation to psychiatric and medical appointments • improving socialization • assist with activities of daily living (i.e., grooming, hygiene, etc.) • encouraging meaningful activity • other services as needed for individual residents b. Target Population: Adults aged 60 years and older who live in Western Contra Costa County, are diagnosed with a serious mental illness and are uninsured or receive Medi-Cal benefits. c. Annual MHSA Payment Limit: $ 453,840. d. Number served: For FY 15/16: 61 beds available. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 876 Vicente Martinez High School - Martinez Unified School District Point of Contact: Lori O’Conner – Vicente Martinez High School Principal, Contact Information: 925 Susana Street, Martinez, CA 94553 (925) 335 – 5880, loconnor@martinez.k12.ca.us 1. General Description of the Organization The program serves Vicente Martinez High School 10-12th grade, at-risk students with a variety of experiential and leadership opportunities that support social, emotional and behavioral health, career exposure and academic growth while also encouraging, linking and increasing student access to direct mental health services. These services are also provided to Briones School students grades 6-12th. The program is jointly facilitated within a unique partnership between Martinez Unified School District (MUSD) and the New Leaf Collaborative (501c3). 2. Program: Vicente Martinez High School & Briones School- PEI a. Scope of Services: Vicente Martinez High School and Briones School provides its students of all cultural backgrounds an integrated, mental health focused, learning experience. Key services include student activities that support: • individualized learning plans • mindfulness and stress management interventions • team and community building • character, leadership, and asset development • place-based learning, service projects that promote hands-on learning and intergenerational relationships • career-focused exploration, preparation and internships • direct mental health counseling • timely access and linkage to direct mental health counseling Services support achievement of a high school diploma, transferable career skills, college readiness, post-secondary training and enrollment, democratic participation, social and emotional literacy and mental/behavioral health. All students also have access to a licensed Mental Health Counselor for individual and group counseling. All students enrolled in Vicente and Briones have access to the variety of intervention services through in-school choices that meet their individual learning goals. Students at Vicente attend classes with 23 or less students led by teachers and staff who have training in working with at-risk students. Briones students experience one-on-one weekly meetings with their teachers. Students regularly monitor their own progress through a comprehensive advisory program designed to assist students to become more self-confident through various academic, leadership, communication, career and holistic health activities. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 877 b. Target Population: At-risk high school students in Central County c. Payment Limit: $175,100 d. Number served: For FY 15/16: 121. e. Outcomes: i. Engagement Focus: Increased engagement of Vicente/Briones students in PEI related services. ii. Short Term Focus: Increased mental health resiliency among Vicente/Briones students. iii. Intermediate Focus: Students enrolled in Vicente and Briones will: • Develop an increased ability to overcome social, familial, emotional, psychiatric, and academic challenges and hence work toward academic, vocational, relational, and other life goals • Participate in four or more different PEI related activities throughout the school year • Decrease incidents of negative behavior • Increase attendance rates June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 878 Vocational Services: Recovery through Employment Readiness Point of Contact: Elena Eagan Contact Information: 1430 Willow Pass Road, Suite 230 Concord, CA 94520 (925)-288-3950, Elena.Eagan@hsd.cccounty.us 1. General Description of the Organization Contra Costa Vocational Services (CCVS) is a program within Contra Costa County Adult Mental Health Programs. CCVS currently has four (4) internal programs including Vocational Services, Benefits Counseling, Support Educational Services and Recovery through Employment Readiness. The Greater East Bay District of the Department of Rehabilitation (DOR) and the Contra Costa Mental Health Vocational Services (CCCMH VS) combined staff and resources to provide vocational rehabilitation services to persons with psychiatric and substance abuse disabilities. 2. Program: Recovery Through Employment Readiness (Innovation) a. Scope of Services Recover through Employment Readiness integrates a vocational rehabilitation counselor as part of the mental health multi-disciplinary team. This team implements a treatment plan for persons with serious mental illness. As identified on the treatment plan the vocational rehabilitation counselor will partner with the consumer to address any and all issues that affect employment readiness prior to any potential referral to the existing job placement specialists and job coaches that are part of the mental health cooperative program. In addition to the vocational rehabilitation counselor providing counseling, life coaching and advocacy in the community, the new program design would provide flexible funding that would enable timely removal of barriers due to a lack of consumer resources. This Innovation Program will add pre-vocational preparation services designed to address common barriers that prevent many consumers from participating in these employment services. These preparation services will be client determined and implemented at the client’s pace with the assistance of a highly trained vocational rehabilitation counselor, working in collaboration with the mental health treatment team. The learning goal is to significantly increase the number of consumers actively working on their vocational rehabilitation as part of their mental health treatment plan. The Contra Costa Clubhouses, Inc. will work in partnership with the Contra Costa Mental Health Cooperative Program to assist clients with educational, training, transportation and miscellaneous expenses directly supporting pre-vocational activities by overseeing the administration of the project’s Flexible Funds. b. Target Population: Target population will be adults who are determined to be seriously mentally ill, meet medical necessity, and are being served by Contra Costa Mental Health’s Adult System of Care. c. Number Served: In FY 15-16: 41 Individuals June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 879 d. Outcomes: After extensive research, planning and evaluation, the Innovation program was rolled out to Central County on November 1, 2015 to address any data tracking, vendor issues and workflow improvements prior to rolling it out to East and West Counties. The Innovation Program was rolled out to East County on February 1, 2016 and to West County on May 1, 2016. During Fiscal Year 2015-16, a total of 46 services were provided to 41 clients who participated at least once in referred service. Out of the 41 clients who received services, 14 clients have successfully been placed in jobs, are in job search or have been referred to the Department of Rehabilitation. The remainder 27 clients declined Vocational Counseling Services, ceased employment due to health issues or failed to comply/follow through. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 880 West County Adult Mental Health Clinic (Contra Costa Behavioral Health) Point of Contact: Anita De Vera, Mental Health Program Manager Contact Information: 2523 El Portal Drive, San Pablo, CA 94806, (510) 215-3700, Anita.Devera@hsd.cccounty.us 1. General Description of the Organization The Behavioral Health Services Division of Contra Costa Health Services combines Mental Health, Alcohol & Other Drugs and Homeless Program into a single system of care. The East Adult Mental Health Clinic operates within Contra Costa Mental Health’s Adult System of Care, and provides assessments, case management, psychiatric services, crisis intervention, housing services, and benefits assistance. Within the Adult Mental Health Clinic are the following MHSA funded programs and plan elements: 2. Plan Element: Adult Full Service Partnership Support - CSS Contra Costa Mental Health has dedicated clinicians at each of the three adult mental health clinics to provide support, coordination and rapid access for full service partners to health and mental health clinic services as needed and appropriate. Rapid Access Clinicians offer drop-in screening and intake appointments to clients who have been discharged from the County Hospital or Psychiatric Emergency Services but who are not open to the county mental health system of care. Rapid Access Clinicians will then refer clients to appropriate services and, when possible, follow-up with clients to ensure a linkage to services was made. If a client meets eligibility criteria for Full Service Partnership services, the Rapid Access Clinician will seek approval to refer the client to Full Service Partnership services. Clinic management acts as the gatekeepers for the Full Service Partnership programs, authorizing referrals and discharges as well as providing clinical oversight to the regional Full Service Partnership programs. Full Service Partnership Liaisons provide support to the Full Service Partnership programs by assisting the programs with referrals and discharges, offering clinical expertise, and helping the programs to navigate the County systems of care. 3. Plan Element: Clinic Support - CSS General Systems Development strategies are programs or strategies that improve the larger mental health system of care. These programs and strategies expand and enhance the existing service structure to 1) assist consumers in obtaining benefits they entitled to, educate consumers on how to maximize use of those benefits and manage resources, and 2) provide transportation support for consumers and families. a. Clinic Target Population: Adults aged 18 years and older who live in West County, are diagnosed with a serious mental illness and are uninsured or receive Medi-Cal benefits. b. Total Number served by clinic: For FY 15-16: Approximately 2,679 Individuals. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 881 West County Children’s Mental Health Clinic (Contra Costa Behavioral Health) Point of Contact: Chad Pierce, Mental Health Program Manager Contact Information: 303 41st St Richmond, CA 94805, (510) 374-7208, Chad.Pierce@hsd.cccounty.us 1. General Description of the Organization The Behavioral Health Services Division of Contra Costa Health Services combines Mental Health, Alcohol & Other Drugs and Homeless Program into a single system of care. The Central Children’s Mental Health Clinic operates within Contra Costa Mental Health’s Children’s System of Care, and provides psychiatric and outpatient services, family partners, and wraparound services. Within the Children’s Mental Health Clinic are the following MHSA funded plan elements: 2. Plan Element: Clinic Support - CSS General Systems Development strategies are programs or strategies that improve the larger mental health system of care. These programs and strategies expand and enhance the existing service structure to assist consumers in the following areas: • Family Partners and Wraparound Facilitation. The family partners assist families with advocacy, transportation assistance, navigation of the service system, and offer support in the home, community, and county service sites. Family partners support families with children of all ages who are receiving services in the children. Family partners are located in each of the regional clinics for children and adult services, and often participate on wraparound teams following the evidence-based model. • A Clinical Specialist in each regional clinic who provides technical assistance and oversight of evidence-based practices in the clinic. • Support for full service partners. a. Target Population: Children aged 17 years and younger, who live in West County, are diagnosed with a serious emotional disturbance or serious mental illness, and are uninsured or receive Medi-Cal benefits. b. Number served by clinic: For FY 15/16: Approximately 1,632 Individuals. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 882 Williams Board and Care Point of Contact: Frederick Williams, Katrina Williams Contact Information: 430 Fordham Drive, Vallejo, CA (707) 731-2326, Fred_Williams@b-f.com 1. General Description of the Organization The County contracts with Williams Board and Care, a licensed board and care operator, to provide additional staff care to enable those with serious mental illness to avoid institutionalization and enable them to live in the community. 2. Program: Augmented Board and Care - Housing Services - CSS a. Scope of Services: Augmented residential services, including but not limited to: • medication management • nutritional meal planning • assistance with laundry • transportation to psychiatric and medical appointments • improving socialization • assist with activities of daily living (i.e., grooming, hygiene, etc.) • encouraging meaningful activity • other services as needed for individual residents b. Target Population: Adults aged 18 years to 59 years who live in Western and Central Contra Costa County, are diagnosed with a serious mental illness and are uninsured or receive Medi-Cal benefits. c. Annual MHSA Payment Limit: $ 31,889 d. Number served: For FY 15/16: 6 beds available. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 883 Woodhaven Point of Contact: Milagros Quezon. Contact Information: 3319 Woodhaven Lane, Concord, CA 94519. Rcasuperprint635@comcast.net (925) 349-4225 1. General Description of the Organization The County contracts with Woodhaven, a licensed board and care operator, to provide additional staff care to enable those with serious mental illness to avoid institutionalization and enable them to live in the community. 2. Program: Augmented Board and Care - Housing Services - CSS a. Scope of Services: Augmented residential services, including but not limited to: • medication management • nutritional meal planning • assistance with laundry • transportation to psychiatric and medical appointments • improving socialization • assist with activities of daily living (i.e., grooming, hygiene, etc.) • encouraging meaningful activity • other services as needed for individual residents b. Target Population: Adults aged 18 years to 59 years who live in Western and Eastern Contra Costa County, are diagnosed with a serious mental illness and are uninsured or receive Medi-Cal benefits. c. Annual MHSA Payment Limit: $ 12,360 d. Number served: For FY 15/16: 5 beds available. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 884 Youth Homes, Inc. Point of Contact: Candy Espino, Executive Director Contact Information: 3480 Buskirk Ave #210, Pleasant Hill, CA 94523, (925) 933–2627, Candye@youthhomes.org 1. General Description of the Organization Youth Homes, Inc. is committed to serving the needs of abused and neglected children and adolescents in California's San Francisco Bay Area. Youth Homes provides intensive residential treatment programs and community-based counseling services that promote the healing process for seriously emotionally abused and traumatized children and adolescents. 2. Program: Transition Age Youth Full Service Partnership - CSS Youth Homes implements a full service partnership program using a combination of aspects of the Integrated Treatment for Co-Occurring Disorders model (also known as Integrated Dual Disorders Treatment – IDDT) and aspects of the Assertive Community Treatment model. These models are recognized evidence based practice in which the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) has created a tool kit to support implementation. Integrated Treatment for Co-Occurring Disorders is an evidence-based practice for treating clients diagnosed with both mental health and a substance abuse disorders. Through Integrated Treatment for Co-Occurring Disorders, consumers receive mental health and substance abuse treatment from a single “integrated treatment specialist” so consumers do not get lost in the health care system, excluded from treatment, or confused by going back and forth between separate mental health and substance abuse programs. It is not expected that all full service partners will be experiencing a substance use issue; however, for those who have co-occurring issues, both disorders can be addressed by one single provider. a. Scope of Services -- Services include: • Outreach and engagement • Case management • Outpatient Mental Health Services, including services for individuals with co- occurring mental health & alcohol and other drug problems • Crisis Intervention • Collateral • Medication support (may be provided by County Physician) • Housing support • Flexible funds • Money Management • Vocational Services • Contractor must be available to consumer on 24/7 basis June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 885 b. Target Population: Young adults ages 16 to 25 years with serious emotional disturbance/serious mental illness, and who are likely to exhibit co-occurring disorders with severe life stressors and are from an underserved population. Services are based in East Contra Costa County as well as Central Contra Costa County. c. Annual MHSA Payment Limit: $ 688,00 d. Number served: For FY 15/16: 42 individuals e. Outcomes: For FY 15/16: • Reduction in incidence of psychiatric crisis • Reduction of the incidence of restriction Table 9. Pre- and post-enrollment utilization rates for 42 Youth Homes FSP Participants enrolled in the FSP program during FY 15-16 No. pre- No. post- Rate pre- Rate post- %change enrollment enrollment enrollment enrollment PES episodes 134 83 0.297 0.192 -35.3 Inpatient episodes 60 26 0.132 0.061 -53.7 Inpatient days 469 228 1.063 0.601 -43.4 * Data on service utilization were collected from the county’s internal billing system, PSP. To assess the effect of FSP enrollment on PES presentations and inpatient episodes, this methodology compares clients’ monthly rates of service utilization pre-enrollment to clients’ post-enrollment service utilization rates. Using PES usage as an example, the calculations used to assess pre- and post-enrollment utilization rates can be expressed as: (No. of PES episodes during pre- enrollment period)/ (No. of months in pre- enrollment period) =Pre-enrollment monthly PES utilization rate (No. of PES episodes during post-enrollment period)/ (No. of months in post- enrollment period) =Post-enrollment monthly PES utilization rate June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 886 Glossary Assembly Bill 1421. AB 1421, also known as Laura’s Law, enacted in 2002, would create an assisted outpatient treatment program for any person who is suffering from a mental disorder and meets certain criteria. The program would operate in counties that choose to provide the services. Adoption of this law enables a court, upon a verified petition to the court, to order a person to obtain and participate in assisted outpatient treatment. The bill provides that if the person who is the subject of the petition fails to comply with outpatient treatment, despite efforts to solicit compliance, a licensed mental health treatment provider may request that the person be placed under a 72-hour hold, based on an involuntary commitment. The law would be operative in those counties in which the county board of supervisors, by resolution, authorized its application and made a finding that no voluntary mental health program serving adults, and no children’s mental health program, would be reduced as a result of the implementation of the law. Assertive Community Treatment (ACT). Assertive Community Treatment is an intensive and highly integrated approach for community mental health service delivery. It is an outpatient treatment for individuals whose symptoms of mental illness result in serious functioning difficulties in several major areas of life, often including work, social relationships, residential independence, money management, and physical health and wellness. Its mission to promote the participants' independence, rehabilitation, and recovery, and in so doing to prevent homelessness, unnecessary hospitalization, and other negative outcomes. It emphasizes out of the office interventions, a low participant to staff ratio, a coordinated team approach, and typically involves a psychiatrist, mental health clinician, nurse, peer provider, and other rehabilitation professionals. Assisted Outpatient Treatment (AOT). Assisted Outpatient Treatment is civil court ordered mental health treatment for persons demonstrating resistance to participating in services. Treatment is modeled after assertive community treatment, which is the delivery of mobile, community-based care by multidisciplinary teams of highly trained mental health professionals with staff-to-client ratios of not more than one to ten, and additional services, as specified, for adults with the most persistent and severe mental illness. AOT involves a service and delivery process that has a clearly designated personal services coordinator who is responsible for providing or assuring needed services. These include complete assessment of the client’s needs, development with the client of a personal services plan, outreach and consultation with the family and other significant persons, linkage with all appropriate community services, monitoring of the quality and follow through of services, and necessary advocacy to ensure each client receives those services which are agreed to in the personal services plan. AOT is cited as part of Assembly Bill 1421, or Laura’s Law. Augmented Board and Care. Board and care facilities licensed by the State also contract with Contra Costa Mental Health to receive additional funding to provide a June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 887 therapeutic environment and assist residents gain their independence through recovery and wellness activities. Extra staff time is devoted to creating a home-like atmosphere, often with shared housekeeping activities, and provide or coordinate a variety of therapeutic, educational, social and vocational activities. Persons who experience severe and persistent mental illness are eligible. Behavioral Health Services (CCBHS). This term refers to the grouping of Contra Costa Mental Health and Substance Use Disorders Services (previously Alcohol and Other Drug Services) under one division of the Health Services Department. Capital Facilities/Information Technology (CF/TN). Capital Facilities and Information Technology is the title of one of five components of the Mental Health Services Act. This component enables a county to utilize MHSA funds for one-time construction projects and/or installation or upgrading of electronic systems, such as mental health records systems. Case Management. Case Management refers to a service in which a mental health clinician develops and implements a treatment plan with a consumer. This treatment plan contains a diagnosis, level of severity, agreed upon goals, and actions by the consumer, the case manager, and other service providers to reach those goals. The mental health clinician provides therapy and additionally takes responsibility for the delivery and/or coordination of both mental and rehabilitation services that assist the consumer reach his/her goals. Clinical Specialist. Clinical Specialist, in the context of this document, refers to a licensed or registered intern in the specialties of social work, marriage and family therapy, psychology, psychiatric nurse practitioner, licensed professional clinical counselor, or psychiatrist. A Clinical Specialist is capable of signing a mental health consumer’s treatment plan that can enable the County to bill Medi-Cal for part of the cost to deliver the service. Clubhouse Model. The Clubhouse Model is a comprehensive program of support and opportunities for people with severe and persistent mental illness. In contrast to traditional day-treatment and other day program models, Clubhouse participants are called "members" (as opposed to "patients" or "clients") and restorative activities focus on their strengths and abilities, not their illness. The Clubhouse is unique in that it is not a clinical program, meaning there are no therapists or psychiatrists on staff. All participation in a clubhouse is strictly on a voluntary basis. Members and staff work side-by-side as partners to manage all the operations of the Clubhouse, providing an opportunity for members to contribute in significant and meaningful ways. A Clubhouse is a place where people can belong as contributing adults, rather than passing their time as patients who need to be treated. The Clubhouse Model seeks to demonstrate that people with mental illness can successfully live productive lives and work in the community, regardless of the nature or severity of their mental illness. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 888 Community Forum. In this context a community forum is a planned group activity where consumers, family members, service providers, and representatives of community, cultural groups or other entities are invited to provide input on a topic or set of issues relevant to planning, implementing or evaluating public services. Community Program Planning Process. This a term used in regulations pertaining to the Mental Health Services Act. It means the process to be used by the County to develop Three-Year Expenditure Plans, and updates in partnership with stakeholders to 1) identify community issues related to mental illness resulting from lack of community services and supports, including any issues identified during the implementation of the Mental Health Services Act, 2) Analyze the mental health needs in the community, and 3) identify and re-evaluate priorities and strategies to meet those mental health needs. Community Services and Supports (CSS). Community Services and Supports is the title of one of five components funded by the Mental Health Services Act. It refers to mental health service delivery systems for children and youth, transition age youth, adults, and older adults. These services and supports are similar to those provided in the mental health system of care that is not funded by MHSA. Within community services and supports are the categories of full service partnerships, general system development, outreach and engagement, and project based housing programs. Consolidated Planning Advisory Workgroup (CPAW). CPAW is an ongoing advisory body appointed by the Contra Costa Mental Health Director that provides advice and counsel in the planning and evaluation of services funded by MHSA. It is also comprised of several sub-committees that focus on specific areas, such as stigma reduction, homelessness, and services to the four age groups. It is comprised of individuals with consumer and family member experience, service providers from the County and community based organizations, and individuals representing allied public services, such as education and social services. Consumers. In this context consumers refer to individuals and their families who receive behavioral health services from the County, contract partners, or private providers. Consumers can be also referred to as clients, participants or members. Contra Costa Mental Health (CCMH). CCMH is one of 58 counties, the City of Berkeley, and the Tri-Cities area East of Los Angeles legislatively empowered to engage in a contract, or Mental Health Plan, with the state to perform public mental health services. This enables Contra Costa County to utilize federal, state, county and private funding for these mental health services. The Mental Health Services Act is one source of state funding. CCMH is divided into a Children’s System of Care and an Adult and Older Adult System of Care. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 889 Co-occurring Disorders. Co-occurring disorders refers to more than one behavioral and/or medical health disorder that an individual can experience and present for care and treatment. Common examples are an individual with a substance abuse disorder coupled with a mental health diagnosis, or a developmental disability, such as autism, coupled with a thought disorder. Cultural Competence. Cultural competence means equal access to services of equal quality is provided, without disparities among racial/ethnic, cultural, and linguistic populations or communities. Employment Services. Employment Services is a continuum of services and supports designed to enable individuals to get and keep a job. It includes 1) pre-vocational services, such as removing barriers to employment, 2)employment preparation, to include career counseling and education, training and volunteer activity support, 3) job placement, to include job seeking, placement assistance and on-the-job training, and 4) job retention, to include supported employment. EPIC system. Epic is a nationwide computer software company that offers an integrated suite of health care software centered on a database. Their applications support functions related to patient care, including registration and scheduling; clinical systems for doctors, nurses, emergency personnel, and other care providers; systems for lab technicians, pharmacists, and radiologists; and billing systems for insurers. Evidence Based Practices. This term refers to treatment practices that follow a prescribed method that has been shown to be effective by the best available evidence. This evidence is comprised of research findings derived from the systematic collection of data through observation and experiment, and the formulation of questions and testing of hypotheses. Family Partners. Also referred to as Parent Partners, this professional brings lived experience as a family member of an individual with a serious mental illness to their provision of services. They often participate as a member of a multi-disciplinary team providing mental health treatment, and assist families understand, acquire and navigate the various services and resources needed. Family-to-Family Training. Family-to-Family is an educational course for family, caregivers and friends of individuals living with mental illness. Taught by trained volunteer instructors from the National Alliance for the Mentally Ill it is a free of cost twelve week course that provides critical information and strategies related to caregiving, and assists in better collaboration with mental health treatment providers. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 890 Federal Poverty Level. This is a total household income amount that the federal government provides an annual guideline that defines whether individuals are living above or below the poverty level. For example, a family of four is determined to live under the poverty level if their total income in 2014 is $23,850. Focus Groups. In this context focus groups are a means for a small group (usually 8- 15) of individuals to provide input, advice and counsel on practices, policies or proposed rulemaking on matters that affect them. Often these individuals are grouped by similar demographics or characteristics in order to provide clarity on a particular perspective. Forensic. In this context this is a term that is connected to individuals involved in the legal court system. Public mental health services utilizing this term identify individuals with mental health issues also involved in the court system. Full Service Partnership (FSP). Full service partnership is a term created by the Mental Health Services Act as a means to require funding from the Act to be used in a certain manner for individuals with serious mental illness. Required features of full service partnerships are that there be a written agreement, or individual services and supports plan, entered into with the client, and when appropriate, the client’s family. This plan may include the full spectrum of community services necessary to attain mutually agreed upon goals. The full spectrum of community services consists of, but is not limited to, mental health treatment, peer support, supportive services to assist the client, and when appropriate the client’s family, in obtaining and maintaining employment, housing, and/or education, wellness centers, culturally specific treatment approaches, crisis intervention/stabilization services, and family education services. Also included are non-mental health services and supports, to include food, clothing, housing, cost of health care and co-occurring disorder treatment, respite care, and wrap-around services to children. The County shall designate a personal service coordinator or case manager for each client to be the single point of responsibility for services and supports, and provide a qualified individual to be available to respond to the client/family 24 hours a day, seven days a week. The Full Service Partnership category is part of the Community Services and Supports (CSS) component of the Mental Health Services Act. At least 50% of the funding for CSS is to go toward supporting the County’s full service partnership category. General System Development. This is a term created by the Mental Health Services Act, and refers to a category of services funded in the community services and supports component, and are similar to those services provided by community public mental health programs authorized in the Welfare and Institutions Code. MHSA funded services contained in the general system development category are designed to June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 891 improve and supplement the county mental health service delivery system for all clients and their families. Greater Bay Area Regional Partnership. Regional partnership means a group of County approved individuals and/or organizations within geographic proximity that acts as an employment and education resource for the public mental health system. These individuals and/or organizations may be county staff, mental health service providers, clients, clients’ family members, and any individuals and/or organizations that have an interest in developing and supporting the workforce of the public mental health system. The Greater Bay Area Regional Partnership refers to an ongoing effort of individuals and/or organizations from the twelve county greater California bay area region. IMPACT (Improving Mood: Providing Access to Collaborative Treatment). This refers to an evidence based mental health treatment for depression utilized specifically for older adults, and is provided in a primary care setting where older adults are concurrently receiving medical care for physical health problems. Up to twelve sessions of problem solving therapy with a year follow up is provided by a licensed clinical therapist, with supervision and support from a psychiatrist who specializes in older adults. The psychiatrist assesses for and monitors medications as needed, and both the clinician and psychiatrist work in collaboration with the primary care physician. Innovation (INN). Innovation is the component of the Mental Health Services Act that funds new or different patterns of service that contribute to informing the mental health system of care as to best or promising practices that can be subsequently added or incorporated into the system. These innovative programs accomplish one or more of the following objectives; i) increase access to underserved groups, ii) increase the quality of services, to include better outcomes, iii) promote interagency collaboration, and iv) increase access to services. All new Innovation programs shall be reviewed and approved by the Mental Health Services Oversight and Accountability Commission. The Act states that five per cent of a County’s revenues shall go for Innovation. Iron Triangle. This term refers to the central area of the city of Richmond that is bordered on three sides by railroad tracks. The communities within this area have a high number of households living below the poverty level, and have a high need for social services, to include public mental health. Laura’s Law. See Assembly Bill 1421. Lesbian, Gay, Bi-sexual, Transgender, Questioning (LGBTQ). Persons in these groups express norms different than the heterosexism of mainstream society, and often experience stigmatism as a result. Lesbian refers to women whose primary emotional, romantic, sexual or affectional attractions are to other women. Gay refers to men whose primary emotional, romantic, sexual or affectional attractions are to other men. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 892 Bi-sexual refers to men or women whose primary emotional, romantic, sexual, or affectional attractions are to both women and men. Transgender is a term that includes persons who cross-dress, are transsexual, and people who live substantial portions of their lives as other than their birth gender. People who are transgender can be straight, gay, lesbian or bi-sexual. Questioning refers to someone who is questioning their sexual and/or gender orientation. Licensed Clinical Specialist. In this context the term licensed clinical specialist is a County civil service classification that denotes a person meeting minimum mental health provider qualifications, to include possessing a license to practice mental health treatment by the California Board of Behavioral Sciences (BBS). An intern registered by BBS also qualifies. A licensed clinical specialist or registered intern can sign mental health treatment plans that qualify for federal financial participation through the Medi- Cal program. Medi-Cal. Medi-Cal is California’s version of the federal Medi-Caid program, in which health and mental health care can be provided by public health and mental health entities to individuals who do not have the ability to pay the full cost of care, and who meet medical necessity requirements. The federal Medi-Caid program reimburses states approximately half of the cost, with the remainder of the cost provided by a variety of state and local funding streams, to include the MHSA. Mental Health Career Pathway Program. Mental Health Career Pathway Programs are education, training and counseling programs designed to recruit and prepare individuals for entry into and advancement in jobs in the public mental health system. These programs are a category listed as part of the workforce education and training component of the Mental Health Services Act. Mental Health Commission (MHC). The County’s Mental Health Commission are individuals, often with lived experience as a consumer and/or family member of a consumer, who are appointed as representatives of the County’s Board of Supervisors to provide 1) oversight and monitoring of the County’s mental health system, 2) advocacy for persons with serious mental illness, and 3) advise the Board of Supervisors and the mental health director. Mental Health Loan Assumption Program (MHLAP). This is a program that makes payments to an educational lending institution on behalf of an employee who has incurred debt while obtaining an education, provided the individual agrees to work in the public mental health system for a specified period of time and in a capacity that meets the employer’s workforce needs. The MHLAP is funded by the Mental Health Services Act in the workforce education and training component. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 893 Mental Health Services Act (MHSA). Also known as Proposition 63, the Mental Health Services Act was voted into law by Californians in November 2004. This program combines prevention services with a full range of integrated services to treat the whole person, with the goal of self-sufficiency for those who may have otherwise faced homelessness or dependence on the state for years to come. The MHSA has five components; community services and supports, prevention and early intervention, innovation, workforce education and training, and capital facilities and technology. An additional one percent of state income tax is collected on incomes exceeding one million dollars and deposited into a Mental Health Services Fund. These funds are provided to the County based upon an agreed upon fair share formula. Mental Health Services Act (MHSA) Three Year Program and Expenditure Plan. Each County prepares and submits a three year plan, which shall be updated at least annually and approved by the County’s Board of Supervisors. The plan will be developed with local stakeholders by means of a community program planning process, and will include programs and funding planned for each component, as well as providing for a prudent reserve. Each plan or update shall indicate the number of children, adults and seniors to be served, as well as reports on the achievement of performance outcomes for services provided. Mental Health Services Oversight and Accountability Commission (MHSOAC). The Mental Health Services Oversight and Accountability Commission was established by the MHSA to provide state oversight of MHSA programs and expenditures, and is responsible for annually reviewing and approving each county mental health program for expenditures pursuant to the components of Innovation and Prevention and Early Intervention. Mental Health Professional Shortage Designations. This is a term used by the federal Human Resource Services Administration to determine areas of the country where there is a verified shortage of mental health professionals. These geographical areas are then eligible to apply for a number of federal programs where financial incentives in recruiting and retention are applied to address the workforce shortage. Money Management. This is a term that refers to services that can encompass all aspects of assisting an individual plan and manage financial benefits and resources. It can include counseling on the interplay of work and other sources of income on Medi- Cal, Medicare, Social Security Disability Income (SSDI), and Supplemental Security Income (SSI). It can include becoming a conservator of funds for an individual who has been deemed to be unable to manage their own funds. Multi-dimensional Family Therapy (MDFT). MDFT is an evidence based comprehensive and multi-systemic family-based outpatient or partial hospitalization June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 894 program for substance-abusing adolescents, adolescents with co-occurring substance use and mental disorders, and those at high risk for continued substance abuse. Treatment is delivered in a series of 12 to 16 weekly or twice weekly 60 to 90 minute sessions. Treatment focuses on the social interaction areas of parents and peers, the parents’ parenting practices, parent-adolescent interactions in therapy, and communications between family members and key social systems, such as school and child welfare. Multi-systemic Therapy (MST). MST is an evidence based mental health service that is a community-based, family driven treatment for antisocial/delinquent behavior in youth. The focus is on empowering parents and caregivers to solve current and future problems, and actively involves the entire ecology of the youth; family, peers, school and the neighborhood. National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI). NAMI is the National Alliance on Mental Illness, the nation’s largest grassroots mental health organization dedicated to building better lives for the millions of Americans affected by mental illness. NAMI advocates for access to services, treatment, supports and research and is steadfast in its commitment to raise awareness and build a community for hope for all of those in need. NAMI is the foundation for hundreds of NAMI State Organizations, NAMI Affiliates and volunteer leaders who work in local communities across the country to raise awareness and provide essential and free education, advocacy and support group programs. Needs Assessment. In this context needs assessment means that part of the community program planning process where the mental health services and supports needs of the community are identified and assessed. This includes identifying populations, age groups and communities that remain unserved, underserved or inappropriately served. Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD). The Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD) is a state department that assists California improve the structure and function of its healthcare delivery systems and promote healthcare accessibility. OSHPD is the state entity responsible for the implementation of various MHSA state level funded workforce education and training programs, such as the mental health loan assumption program, psychiatric residency programs, and several graduate stipend and internship programs. Outreach and Engagement. In this context outreach and engagement is a MHSA term that is a community services and support category, and a category in which prevention and early intervention services can be provided. Services are designed to reach out and engage individuals in mental health care who have a serious mental illness, or are June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 895 at risk of developing a serious mental illness. These are individuals who have not sought services in a traditional manner due to cultural or linguistic barriers. Peer Provider. This is a term that refers to a professional who brings lived experience as a mental health consumer to their provision of services. They often participate as a member of a multi-disciplinary team providing mental health treatment, and assist consumers and their families understand, acquire and navigate the various services and resources needed. Perinatal Depression. Perinatal depression is depression that occurs during pregnancy and up to twelve months after giving birth. It can be caused by changes in hormones during pregnancy and after having a baby. It can also be caused by the many stresses of being a new mother. Postpartum depression, or depression after delivery, is different from post-partum “blues,” which peak three to five days after delivery and usually end within two weeks after the baby’s birth. A woman with perinatal depression has symptoms that last two weeks or longer. Personal Service Coordinators. Personal service coordinators, also known as case managers, refers to a mental health clinician who develops and implements an individual services and support plan with an individual diagnosed with a serious mental illness, and who is part of a full service partner program under the MHSA. This plan contains a diagnosis, level of severity, agreed upon goals, and actions by the consumer, the personal services coordinator, and other service providers to reach those goals. The personal service coordinator provides therapy, and additionally takes responsibility for the delivery and/or coordination of both mental health and rehabilitation services that assist the consumer reach his/her goals. PhotoVoice Empowerment Project. The County sponsors classes designed to enable individuals to create artwork consisting of a photograph and a personally written story that speak to or represent the challenges of prejudice and discrimination that people with behavioral health challenges face. These artworks are then displayed in the community to educate, raise awareness and reduce stigma. Portland Identification and Early Referral (PIER) Model. This is an evidence based treatment developed by the PIERS Institute of Portland, Maine. It is an early intervention program for youth, ages 12-25 who are at risk for developing psychosis. It is a multi-disciplinary team approach consisting of a structured interview to assess risk for psychosis, multi-family group therapy, psychiatric care, family psycho-education, supported education and employment, and occupational therapy. Positive Parenting Program. The Triple P Positive Parenting Program is an evidence based practice designed to increase parents’ sense of competence in their parenting June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 896 abilities. It is a multilevel system of family intervention that aims to prevent severe emotional and behavioral disturbances in children by promoting positive and nurturing relationships between parent and child. Improved family communication and reduced conflict reduces the risk that children will develop a variety of behavioral and emotional problems. Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is an emotional illness that that is classified as an anxiety disorder, and usually develops as a result of a terribly frightening, life-threatening, or otherwise highly unsafe experience. PTSD sufferers re-experience the traumatic event or events in some way, tend to avoid places, people, or other things that remind them of the event (avoidance), and are exquisitely sensitive to normal life experiences (hyper arousal). Prevention and Early Intervention (PEI). Prevention and Early Intervention is a term created by the Mental Health Services Act, and refers to a component of funding in which services are designed to prevent mental illnesses from becoming severe and disabling. This means providing outreach and engagement to increase recognition of early signs of mental illness, and intervening early in the onset of a mental illness. Twenty percent of funds received by the Mental Health Services Act are to be spent for prevention and early intervention services. Pre-vocational Employment Services. These are services that enable a person to actively engage in finding and keeping a job. Often the services remove barriers to employment services, such as counseling on how working affects benefits, stabilizing medications, obtaining a driver’s license or general education diploma, and resolving immigration or other legal issues. Prudent Reserve. This is a term created by the Mental Health Services Act, and refers to a County setting aside sufficient MHSA revenues in order to ensure that services do not have to be significantly reduced in years in which revenues are below the average of previous years. Psychiatric Emergency Services (PES). The psychiatric emergency services unit of Contra Costa County is located next door to the Emergency Room of the Regional Medical Center in Martinez. It operated 24 hours a day, seven days a week, and consists of psychiatrists, nurses and mental health clinicians who are on call and available to respond to individuals who are brought in due to a psychiatric emergency. Persons who are seen are either treated and released, or admitted to the in-patient psychiatric hospital ward. Psychiatric Residency. Physicians who specialize in psychiatry complete a four year residency program at one of several schools of psychiatry, such as that located at the University of California at San Francisco. This is essentially a paid work study June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 897 arrangement, where they practice under close supervision and concurrently take coursework. At the final residency year the psychiatrist can elect to work in a medical setting, teach, do research, or work in a community mental health setting. Serious Mental Illness (SMI). Adults with a serious mental illness are persons eighteen years and older who, at any time during a given year, have a diagnosable mental, behavioral, or emotional disorder that meet the criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, and the disorder has resulted in functional impairment which substantially interferes with or limits one or more major life activities. Seriously Emotionally Disturbed (SED). Children from birth up to age eighteen with serious emotional disturbance are persons who currently or at any time during the past year have had a diagnosable mental, behavioral, or emotional disorder of sufficient duration to meet diagnostic criteria specified within the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual and results in functional impairment which substantially interferes with or limits the child's role or functioning in family, school, or community activities. Service Provider Individualized Recovery Intensive Training (SPIRIT). SPIRIT is a recovery oriented, peer led classroom and experiential-based, college accredited educational program for individuals with lived experience as a consumer or family member of a loved one receiving mental health services. It is sponsored by Contra Costa Mental Health and Contra Costa Community College, and successful completion satisfies the minimum qualifications to be considered for employment by the County as a Community Support Worker. Stakeholders. Stakeholders is a term defined in the California Code of Regulations to mean individuals or entities with an interest in mental health services, including but not limited to individuals with serious mental illness and/or serious emotional disturbance and/or their families, providers of mental health and/or related services such as physical health care and/or social services, educators and/or representatives of education, representatives of law enforcement, and any organization that represents the interests of individuals with serious mental illness and/or serious emotional disturbance and/or their families. Stigma and Discrimination. In this context these terms refer to the negative thoughts and/or behaviors that form an inaccurate generalization or judgment, and adversely affects the recovery, wellness and resiliency of persons with mental health issues. These thoughts and behaviors can include any person who has an influence on a person’s mental health well-being, to include the person experiencing the mental health issue. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 898 Substance Use Disorder. A substance use disorder is a disorder in which the use of one or more substances leads to a clinically significant impairment or distress. Although the term substance can refer to any physical matter, substance abuse refers to the overuse of, or dependence on, a drug leading to effects that are detrimental to the individual's physical and mental health, or the welfare of others. The disorder is characterized by a pattern of continued pathological use of a medication, non-medically indicated drug or toxin which results in repeated adverse social consequences related to drug use, such as failure to meet work, family, or school obligations, interpersonal conflicts, or legal problems. Supported Employment. Supported employment is a federal vocational rehabilitation term that means competitive work for individuals with the most significant disabilities that occurs in integrated work settings, or settings in which individuals are working toward competitive work. Such work is consistent with the strengths, resources, priorities, concerns, abilities, capabilities, interests, and informed choice of the individuals. Supported employment usually means that a professional support person, or job coach, assists the individual in a competitive work setting until assistance is no longer needed. Supportive Housing. Supportive housing is a combination of housing and services intended as a cost-effective way to help people live more stable, productive lives. Supportive housing is widely believed to work well for those who face the most complex challenges—individuals and families confronted with homelessness and who also have very low incomes and/or serious, persistent issues that may include substance abuse, addiction or alcoholism, mental illness, HIV/AIDS, or other serious challenges to a successful life. Supportive housing can be coupled with such social services as job training, life skills training, alcohol and drug abuse programs, community support services, such as child care and educational programs, and case management to populations in need of assistance. Supportive housing is intended to be a pragmatic solution that helps people have better lives while reducing, to the extent feasible, the overall cost of care. Systematic Training for Effective Parenting (STEP). Systematic Training for Effective Parenting (STEP) is a parent education program published as a series of books developed and published by the psychologists Don Dinkmeyer Sr., Gary D. McKay and Don Dinkmeyer Jr. The publication was supplemented by an extensive concept for training and proliferation. STEP has reached more than four million parents and has been translated into several languages. It provides skills training for parents dealing with frequently encountered challenges with their children that often result from autocratic parenting styles. STEP is rooted in Adlerian psychology and promotes a more participatory family structure by fostering responsibility, independence, and June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 899 competence in children; improving communication between parents and children; and helping children learn from the natural and logical consequences of their own choices. Transition Age Youth (TAY). Transition Age Youth is a term meaning individuals who are between the age of 16 years and 25 years of age. Specific mental health programs that address this age group are in the adult system of care, and were designed to assist in the transition of services from the children’s system of care, where individuals stop receiving services at 18. Workforce Education and Training (WET). Workforce Education and Training is a term created by the Mental Health Services Act, and refers to the component of the MHSA that funds programs and service that assist in the recruitment and retention of a skilled and culturally competent mental health workforce. Wellness Recovery Action Plan (WRAP). The Wellness Recovery Action Plan, or WRAP, is an evidence-based practice that is used by people who are dealing with mental health and other kinds of health challenges, and by people who want to attain the highest possible level of wellness. It was developed by a group of people who have a lived experience with mental health difficulties and who were searching for ways to resolve issues that had been troubling them for a long time. WRAP involves listing one’s personal resources and wellness tools, and then using those resources to develop action plans to use in specific situations. Wraparound Services. W raparound services are an intensive, individualized care management process for children with serious emotional disturbances. During the wraparound process, a team of individuals who are relevant to the well-being of the child or youth, such as family members, other natural supports, service providers, and agency representatives collaboratively develop an individualized plan of care, implement this plan, and evaluate success over time. The wraparound plan typically includes formal services and interventions, together with community services and interpersonal support and assistance provided by friends and other people drawn from the family’s social networks. The team convenes frequently to measure the plan’s components against relevant indicators of success. Plan components and strategies are revised when outcomes are not being achieved. Wellness Recovery Education for Acceptance, Choice and Hope (WREACH). The WREACH Speaker’s Bureau is sponsored by Contra Costa Behavioral Health Services, and is designed to reduce the stigma that consumers and family members often face in the workplace, behavioral and physical health care systems, and in their communities. The WREACH program forms connections between people in the community and people with lived mental health and co-occurring disorders experiences by providing June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 900 opportunities for sharing stories of recovery and resiliency, and sharing current information on health treatment and supports. Workshops are held to teach people and their families how to write and present their recovery and resilience stories. These individuals are then connected with audiences that include behavioral health providers, academic faculty and students, law enforcement, physical health providers and the general community. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 901 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 902 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 903 County:Contra Costa Date: A B C D E F Community Services and Supports Prevention and Early Intervention Innovation Workforce Education and Training Capital Facilities and Technological Needs Prudent Reserve Total A. Estimated FY 2017/18 Funding 1.Unspent Funds from Prior Fiscal Years 32,180,600 4,779,776 4,617,267 233,569 696,134 - 42,507,346 2.New FY2017/18 Funding 34,873,772 7,943,443 2,090,379 44,907,594 3.Transfer in FY2017/18a/(7,795,034)7,795,034 - 4.Available Funding for FY2017/18 59,259,338 12,723,219 6,707,646 8,028,603 696,134 - 87,414,940 B. Budgeted FY2017/18 MHSA Expenditures 37,602,567 8,668,448 2,120,226 2,539,666 643,835 - 51,574,742 C. Estimated FY2018/19 Funding 1.Unspent Funds from Prior Fiscal Years 21,656,771 4,054,771 4,587,420 5,488,937 52,299 - 35,840,198 2.Estimated New FY2018/19 Funding 35,405,520 8,076,380 2,125,363 45,607,263 3.Transfer in FY2018/19a/- 4.Estimated Available Funding for FY2018/19 57,062,291 12,131,151 6,712,783 5,488,937 52,299 - 81,447,461 D. Budgeted FY2018/19 Expenditures 36,772,145 8,926,161 2,159,833 2,602,956 52,299 - 50,513,394 E. Estimated FY2019/20 Funding 1.Estimated Unspent Funds from Prior Fiscal Years 20,290,146 3,204,990 4,552,950 2,885,981 - - 30,934,067 2.Estimated New FY2019/20 Funding 35,405,520 8,076,380 2,125,363 45,607,263 3.Transfer in FY2019/20a/- 4.Estimated Available Funding for FY2019/20 55,695,666 11,281,370 6,678,313 2,885,981 - - 76,541,330 F. Budgeted FY2019/20 Expenditures 37,690,970 9,191,606 2,200,628 2,668,145 - - 51,751,349 G. Estimated FY2019/20 Unspent Fund Balance 18,004,696 2,089,764 4,477,685 217,836 - - 24,789,981 H. Estimated Local Prudent Reserve Balance 1. Estimated Local Prudent Reserve Balance on June 30, 2017 7,125,250 I. Estimated Beginning Balance for FY 2017/18 1. Estimated Unspent Funds from Fiscal Year 2016-17 42,507,346 2. Estimated Local Prudent Reserve Balance on June 30, 2017 7,125,250 3. Estimated Total Beginning Balance 49,632,596 5/22/2017 FY 2017-18 Through FY 2019-20 Three-Year Mental Health Services Act Expenditure Plan Funding Summary MHSA Funding June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 904 County:Contra Costa Date:June 2, 2017 A B C D E F Estimated Total Mental Health Expenditures Estimated CSS Funding Estimated Medi- Cal FFP Estimated 1991 Realignment Estimated Behavioral Health Subaccount Estimated Other Funding FSP Programs 1.Children 2,798,275 2,798,275 2.Transition Age Youth 2,157,611 2,157,611 3.Adult 2,896,455 2,896,455 4.Adult Mental Health Clinic Support 1,772,145 1,772,145 5.Assisted Outpatient Treatment 2,392,241 2,392,241 6.Wellness and Recovery Centers 901,250 901,250 7.Crisis Residential Center 2,077,530 2,077,530 8.MHSA Housing Services 8,502,117 8,502,117 9.Oak Grove Youth Residential Program 250,000 250,000 10.0 Non-FSP Programs 1.Older Adult Mental Health Program 3,388,069 3,388,069 2.Children's Wraparound Support 4,106,329 4,106,329 3.Miller Wellness Center 319,819 319,819 4.Concord Health Center 265,071 265,071 5.Liaison Staff 139,139 139,139 6.Clinic Support 1,288,969 1,288,969 7.Forensic Team 982,245 982,245 8.Quality Assurance 1,248,006 1,248,006 9.Administrative Support 2,117,296 2,117,296 10.0 CSS Administration 0 CSS MHSA Housing Program Assigned Funds 0 Total CSS Program Estimated Expenditures 37,602,567 37,602,567 0 0 0 0 FSP Programs as Percent of Total 63.2% FY 2017-18 Through FY 2019-20 Three-Year Mental Health Services Act Expenditure Plan Community Services and Supports (CSS) Component Worksheet Fiscal Year 2017/18 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 905 County:Contra Costa Date:June 2, 2017 FY 2017-18 Through FY 2019-20 Three-Year Mental Health Services Act Expenditure Plan Community Services and Supports (CSS) Component Worksheet A B C D E F Estimated Total Mental Health Expenditures Estimated CSS Funding Estimated Medi- Cal FFP Estimated 1991 Realignment Estimated Behavioral Health Subaccount Estimated Other Funding FSP Programs 1.Children 3,290,426 3,290,426 2.Transition Age Youth 2,222,339 2,222,339 3.Adult 2,983,349 2,983,349 4.Adult Mental Health Clinic Support 1,825,309 1,825,309 5.Assisted Outpatient Treatment 2,464,008 2,464,008 6.Wellness and Recovery Centers 928,288 928,288 7.Crisis Residential Center 2,139,856 2,139,856 8.MHSA Housing Services 6,492,478 6,492,478 9.Oak Grove Youth Residential Program 250,000 250,000 10.0 Non-FSP Programs 1.Older Adult Mental Health Program 3,489,711 3,489,711 2.Children's Wraparound Support 4,154,519 4,154,519 3.Miller Wellness Center 329,414 329,414 4.Concord Health Center 273,023 273,023 5.Liaison Staff 143,314 143,314 6.Clinic Support 1,327,639 1,327,639 7.Forensic Team 995,212 995,212 8.Quality Assurance 1,285,446 1,285,446 9.Administrative Support 2,177,814 2,177,814 10.0 CSS Administration 0 CSS MHSA Housing Program Assigned Funds 0 Total CSS Program Estimated Expenditures 36,772,145 36,772,145 0 0 0 0 FSP Programs as Percent of Total 61.4% Fiscal Year 2018/19 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 906 County:Contra Costa Date:June 2, 2017 FY 2017-18 Through FY 2019-20 Three-Year Mental Health Services Act Expenditure Plan Community Services and Supports (CSS) Component Worksheet A B C D E F Estimated Total Mental Health Expenditures Estimated CSS Funding Estimated Medi- Cal FFP Estimated 1991 Realignment Estimated Behavioral Health Subaccount Estimated Other Funding FSP Programs 1.Children 3,313,400 3,313,400 2.Transition Age Youth 2,289,010 2,289,010 3.Adult 3,072,849 3,072,849 4.Adult Mental Health Clinic Support 1,880,069 1,880,069 5.Assisted Outpatient Treatment 2,537,928 2,537,928 6.Wellness and Recovery Centers 956,136 956,136 7.Crisis Residential Center 2,204,052 2,204,052 8.MHSA Housing Services 6,680,652 6,680,652 9.Oak Grove Youth Residential Program 250,000 250,000 10.0 Non-FSP Programs 1.Older Adult Mental Health Program 3,594,402 3,594,402 2.Children's Wraparound Support 4,204,155 4,204,155 3.Miller Wellness Center 339,296 339,296 4.Concord Health Center 281,214 281,214 5.Liaison Staff 147,613 147,613 6.Clinic Support 1,367,468 1,367,468 7.Forensic Team 1,008,569 1,008,569 8.Quality Assurance 1,324,008 1,324,008 9.Administrative Support 2,240,149 2,240,149 10.0 CSS Administration 0 CSS MHSA Housing Program Assigned Funds 0 Total CSS Program Estimated Expenditures 37,690,970 37,690,970 0 0 0 0 FSP Programs as Percent of Total 61.5% Fiscal Year 2019/20 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 907 County:Contra Costa Date:June 2, 2017 A B C D E F Estimated Total Mental Health Expenditures Estimated PEI Funding Estimated Medi- Cal FFP Estimated 1991 Realignment Estimated Behavioral Health Subaccount Estimated Other Funding PEI Programs - Prevention 1.Outreach for Increasing Recognition of Early Signs of Mental Illness 1,035,575 1,035,575 2.Prevention 1,661,788 1,661,788 3.Access and Linkage to Treatment 1,136,301 1,136,301 4. Improving Timely Access to Mental Health Services for Underserved Population 1,580,477 1,580,477 5.Stigma and Discrimination Reduction 295,495 295,495 6.Suicide Prevention 435,378 435,378 7.Administrative support 146,154 146,154 8.0 9.0 10.0 PEI Programs - Early Intervention 11.First Hope 2,377,280 2,377,280 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0 18.0 19.0 20.0 PEI Administration 0 PEI Assigned Funds 0 Total PEI Program Estimated Expenditures 8,668,448 8,668,448 0 0 0 0 FY 2017-18 Through FY 2019-20 Three-Year Mental Health Services Act Expenditure Plan Prevention and Early Intervention (PEI) Component Worksheet Fiscal Year 2017/18 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 908 County:Contra Costa Date:June 2, 2017 FY 2017-18 Through FY 2019-20 Three-Year Mental Health Services Act Expenditure Plan Prevention and Early Intervention (PEI) Component Worksheet A B C D E F Estimated Total Mental Health Expenditures Estimated PEI Funding Estimated Medi- Cal FFP Estimated 1991 Realignment Estimated Behavioral Health Subaccount Estimated Other Funding PEI Programs - Prevention 1.Outreach for Increasing Recognition of Early Signs of Mental Illness 1,028,761 1,028,761 2.Prevention 1,655,339 1,655,339 3.Access and Linkage to Treatment 1,163,524 1,163,524 4. p g y Population 1,525,749 1,525,749 5.Stigma and Discrimination Reduction 302,020 302,020 6.Suicide Prevention 448,439 448,439 7.Administrative support 150,538 150,538 8.0 0 0 9.0 0 0 10.0 PEI Programs - Early Intervention 11.First Hope 2,651,791 2,651,791 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0 18.0 19.0 20.0 PEI Administration 0 PEI Assigned Funds 0 Total PEI Program Estimated Expenditures 8,926,161 8,926,161 0 0 0 0 Fiscal Year 2018/19 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 909 County:Contra Costa Date:June 2, 2017 FY 2017-18 Through FY 2019-20 Three-Year Mental Health Services Act Expenditure Plan Prevention and Early Intervention (PEI) Component Worksheet A B C D E F Estimated Total Mental Health Expenditures Estimated PEI Funding Estimated Medi- Cal FFP Estimated 1991 Realignment Estimated Behavioral Health Subaccount Estimated Other Funding PEI Programs - Prevention 1.Outreach for Increasing Recognition of Early Signs of Mental Illness 1,059,624 1,059,624 2.Prevention 1,704,999 1,704,999 3.Access and Linkage to Treatment 1,198,430 1,198,430 4. p g y Population 1,571,522 1,571,522 5.Stigma and Discrimination Reduction 308,741 308,741 6.Suicide Prevention 461,892 461,892 7.Administrative support 155,054 155,054 8.0 0 0 9.0 0 0 10.0 PEI Programs - Early Intervention 11.First Hope 2,731,344 2,731,344 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0 18.0 19.0 20.0 PEI Administration 0 PEI Assigned Funds 0 Total PEI Program Estimated Expenditures 9,191,606 9,191,606 0 0 0 0 Fiscal Year 2019/20 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 910 County:Contra Costa Date:June 2, 2017 A B C D E F Estimated Total Mental Health Expenditures Estimated INN Funding Estimated Medi- Cal FFP Estimated 1991 Realignment Estimated Behavioral Health Subaccount Estimated Other Funding INN Programs 1.Recovery Through Employment Readiness 100,000 100,000 2.Coaching to Wellness 474,039 474,039 3.Partners in Aging 181,067 181,067 4.Overcoming Transportation Barriers 241,450 241,450 5.Administrative Support 423,670 423,670 6.Emerging Projects 700,000 700,000 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0 18.0 19.0 20.0 INN Administration 0 Total INN Program Estimated Expenditures 2,120,226 2,120,226 0 0 0 0 FY 2017-18 Through FY 2019-20 Three-Year Mental Health Services Act Expenditure Plan Innovations (INN) Component Worksheet Fiscal Year 2017/18 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 911 County:Contra Costa Date:June 2, 2017 FY 2017-18 Through FY 2019-20 Three-Year Mental Health Services Act Expenditure Plan Innovations (INN) Component Worksheet A B C D E F Estimated Total Mental Health Expenditures Estimated INN Funding Estimated Medi- Cal FFP Estimated 1991 Realignment Estimated Behavioral Health Subaccount Estimated Other Funding INN Programs 1.Recovery Through Employment Readiness 100,000 100,000 2.Coaching to Wellness 488,261 488,261 3.Partners in Aging 186,499 186,499 4.Overcoming Transportation Barriers 248,693 248,693 5.Administrative Support 436,380 436,380 6.Emerging Projects 700,000 700,000 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0 18.0 19.0 20.0 INN Administration 0 Total INN Program Estimated Expenditures 2,159,833 2,159,833 0 0 0 0 I. Estimated Beginning Balance for FY 2016/17 Fiscal Year 2018/19 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 912 County:Contra Costa Date:June 2, 2017 FY 2017-18 Through FY 2019-20 Three-Year Mental Health Services Act Expenditure Plan Innovations (INN) Component Worksheet A B C D E F Estimated Total Mental Health Expenditures Estimated INN Funding Estimated Medi- Cal FFP Estimated 1991 Realignment Estimated Behavioral Health Subaccount Estimated Other Funding INN Programs 1.Recovery Through Employment Readiness 100,000 100,000 2.Coaching to Wellness 502,909 502,909 3.Partners in Aging 192,094 192,094 4.Overcoming Transportation Barriers 256,154 256,154 5.Administrative Support 449,471 449,471 6.Emerging Projects 700,000 700,000 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0 18.0 19.0 20.0 INN Administration 0 Total INN Program Estimated Expenditures 2,200,628 2,200,628 0 0 0 0 Fiscal Year 2019/20 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 913 County:Contra Costa Date:June 2, 2017 A B C D E F Estimated Total Mental Health Expenditures Estimated WET Funding Estimated Medi- Cal FFP Estimated 1991 Realignment Estimated Behavioral Health Subaccount Estimated Other Funding WET Programs 1.Workforce Staffing Support 1,228,940 1,228,940 2.Training and Technical Support 230,000 230,000 3.Mental Health Career Pathway Program 435,726 435,726 4.Internship Programs 345,000 345,000 5.Financial Incentive Programs 300,000 300,000 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0 18.0 19.0 20.0 WET Administration 0 Total WET Program Estimated Expenditures 2,539,666 2,539,666 0 0 0 0 FY 2017-18 Through FY 2019-20 Three-Year Mental Health Services Act Expenditure Plan Workforce, Education and Training (WET) Component Worksheet Fiscal Year 2017/18 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 914 County:Contra Costa Date:June 2, 2017 FY 2017-18 Through FY 2019-20 Three-Year Mental Health Services Act Expenditure Plan Workforce, Education and Training (WET) Component Worksheet A B C D E F Estimated Total Mental Health Expenditures Estimated WET Funding Estimated Medi- Cal FFP Estimated 1991 Realignment Estimated Behavioral Health Subaccount Estimated Other Funding WET Programs 1.Workforce Staffing Support 1,265,808 1,265,808 2.Training and Technical Support 236,900 236,900 3.Mental Health Career Pathway Program 447,898 447,898 4.Internship Programs 352,350 352,350 5.Financial Incentive Programs 300,000 300,000 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0 18.0 19.0 20.0 WET Administration 0 Total WET Program Estimated Expenditures 2,602,956 2,602,956 0 0 0 0 I. Estimated Beginning Balance for FY 2016/17 Fiscal Year 2018/19 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 915 County:Contra Costa Date:June 2, 2017 FY 2017-18 Through FY 2019-20 Three-Year Mental Health Services Act Expenditure Plan Workforce, Education and Training (WET) Component Worksheet A B C D E F Estimated Total Mental Health Expenditures Estimated WET Funding Estimated Medi- Cal FFP Estimated 1991 Realignment Estimated Behavioral Health Subaccount Estimated Other Funding WET Programs 1.Workforce Staffing Support 1,303,783 1,303,783 2.Training and Technical Support 244,007 244,007 3.Mental Health Career Pathway Program 460,435 460,435 4.Internship Programs 359,920 359,920 5.Financial Incentive Programs 300,000 300,000 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0 18.0 19.0 20.0 WET Administration 0 Total WET Program Estimated Expenditures 2,668,145 2,668,145 0 0 0 0 Fiscal Year 2019/20 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 916 County:Contra Costa Date:June 2, 2017 A B C D E F Estimated Total Mental Health Expenditures Estimated CFTN Funding Estimated Medi- Cal FFP Estimated 1991 Realignment Estimated Behavioral Health Subaccount Estimated Other Funding CFTN Programs - Capital Facilities Projects 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 CFTN Programs - Technological Needs Projects 11.Electronic Health Records System - Administ 643,835 643,835 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0 18.0 19.0 20.0 CFTN Administration 0 Total CFTN Program Estimated Expenditures 643,835 643,835 0 0 0 0 FY 2017-18 Through FY 2019-20 Three-Year Mental Health Services Act Expenditure Plan Capital Facilities/Technological Needs (CFTN) Component Worksheet Fiscal Year 2017/18 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 917 County:Contra Costa Date:June 2, 2017 FY 2017-18 Through FY 2019-20 Three-Year Mental Health Services Act Expenditure Plan Capital Facilities/Technological Needs (CFTN) Component Worksheet A B C D E F Estimated Total Mental Health Expenditures Estimated CFTN Funding Estimated Medi- Cal FFP Estimated 1991 Realignment Estimated Behavioral Health Subaccount Estimated Other Funding CFTN Programs - Capital Facilities Projects 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 CFTN Programs - Technological Needs Projects 11.Electronic Health Records System - Administ 52,299 52,299 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0 18.0 19.0 20.0 CFTN Administration 0 Total CFTN Program Estimated Expenditures 52,299 52,299 0 0 0 0 Fiscal Year 2018/19 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 918 County:Contra Costa Date:June 2, 2017 FY 2017-18 Through FY 2019-20 Three-Year Mental Health Services Act Expenditure Plan Capital Facilities/Technological Needs (CFTN) Component Worksheet A B C D E F Estimated Total Mental Health Expenditures Estimated CFTN Funding Estimated Medi- Cal FFP Estimated 1991 Realignment Estimated Behavioral Health Subaccount Estimated Other Funding CFTN Programs - Capital Facilities Projects 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 CFTN Programs - Technological Needs Projects 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0 18.0 19.0 20.0 CFTN Administration 0 Total CFTN Program Estimated Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0 Fiscal Year 2019/20 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 919 PUBLIC COMMENT PUBLIC HEARING MHSA FISCAL YEAR 2017/2020 Three Year Program and Expenditure Plan June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 920 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 921 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 922 The Commission will provide reasonable accommodations for persons with disabilities planning to attend. Please contact the Executive Assistant at: 925-957-5140, at least 48 hours prior to the meeting. Thank you. AGENDA AGENDA I. Call to Order- Regular meeting of the Mental Health Commission/Introductions II. Proclamation to declare May as Mental Health Awareness Month By: Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II III. CREATE an ad hoc committee to screen Mental Health Commission applicants, to forward to the Board of Supervisors for approval and appointment IV. RECEIVE introduction to 1420 Willow Pass renovation and CREATE an ad hoc committee for continuing review of the project: -Adam Down V. APPROVE minutes from April 5, 2017 VI. Adjourn – Mental Health Commission meeting ___________________________________________________________ I. Call to order -Public Hearing on the Mental Health Services Act Three Year Program and Expenditure Plan II. Opening Comments by the Mental Health Commission-Chair A. Review of authority for Public Hearing, Welfare & Institutions Code 5848 (a) (b). A draft plan and update shall be prepared and circulated for review and comment for at least 30 days to representatives of stakeholder interests and any interested party who has requested a copy of the draft plans. The Mental Health Commission shall conduct a public hearing on the draft plan and annual updates at the close of the 30 day comment period. The Mental Health Commission shall review the adopted plan or update and make recommendations to the County Mental Health Department for revisions. B. Review of Public Hearing purpose to confirm and complete the process. Contra Costa County’s Mental Health Commission Hosts a PUBLIC HEARING On the Fiscal Years 2017 to 2020 Mental Health Services Act Three Year Program and Expenditure Plan Wednesday, May 3, 20174:30pm to 6:30pm 550 Ellinwood Way, Pleasant Hill June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 923 The Commission will provide reasonable accommodations for persons with disabilities planning to attend. Please contact the Executive Assistant at: 925-957-5140, at least 48 hours prior to the meeting. Thank you. III. Fiscal Years2017 to 2020 Mental Health Services Act (MHSA) Three Year Program and Expenditure Plan- by Warren Hayes, MHSA Program Manager. The plan is available for review at: http://cchealth.org/mentalhealth/ IV. Public Comment regarding the Plan- Members of the public may comment on any item of public interest within the jurisdiction of the Mental Health Commission. Public Comment cards are available on the table at the back of the room; please give your card to the Executive Assistant of the Mental Health Commission. In the interest of time and equal opportunity, speakers are requested to please adhere to a 3 minute time limit, per person. In accordance to the Brown Act, if a member of the public addresses an item not on the agenda, no response, discussion or action on the item will occur, except for the purpose of clarification. V. Commissioner Comments- Members of the Commission may comment on any item of public interest within the jurisdiction of the Mental Health Commission. Commissioner Comment cards are available at your seats. Please give your card to the Executive Assistant of the Mental Health Commission. In the interest of time and equal opportunity, speakers are requested to please adhere to a 3 minute maximum time limit, per person. In accordance with the Brown Act, if a member of the public addresses an item not on the agenda, no response, discussion or action on the item will occur, except for the purpose of clarification. VI. Develop a list of Comments and Recommendations to the County Mental Health Administration (MHA) and to the Board of Supervisors (BOS) VII. Adjourn- Public Hearing June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 924 Public Hearing Presentation MHSA Three Year Program and Expenditure Plan for FY 2017-20 Contra Costa Behavioral Health Services is pleased to present the Draft Mental Health Services Act (MHSA) Three Year Program and Expenditure Plan for Fiscal Years 2017- 18 through 2019-20. Included for your consideration this evening are copies of the draft plan, and copies of a summary outline of the plan. We welcome your input. The Three Year Plan proposes to set aside $51.6 million for fiscal year 2017-18 in order to fund over 80 programs and plan elements. This is an $8.5 million annual increase in requested budget authority from the current Three Year Plan. This increase will be offset by estimated additional Medi-Cal reimbursement, increase in state MHSA Trust Fund revenue, and use of unspent MHSA funds from previous years. The Three Year Plan includes $37.6 million to fund 39 programs and plan elements in the Community Services and Supports component that will serve approximately 2,000 individuals who are experiencing a serious mental illness. Our Prevention and Early Intervention component plans to set aside $8.7 million to fund 26 programs serving approximately 13,000 persons, and are designed to prevent mental illness from becoming severe and debilitating. $2.1 million is budgeted for six Innovative Projects, and $2.5 million is set aside for programs to recruit, train, retain and support our public mental health workforce. Finally, our Capital Facilities/Information Technology component will utilize the remaining funds allocated for implementation of the electronic mental health records project. A data driven Needs Assessment was conducted of public mental health services, and an inclusive Community Program Planning Process engaged stakeholders in identifying service gaps, prioritizing community public mental health needs, and suggesting strategies to meet these needs. All identified service gaps and prioritized needs from the Needs Assessment and Community Program Planning Process are referenced and addressed in the Three Year Plan. Significant changes to the Three Year Plan include the following: • $1.7 million earmarked for permanent subsidized housing for persons with serious mental illness (Special Needs Housing Program), and introduction of planning for use of state funding to be available sometime in fiscal year 2018-19 for the “No Place Like Home” initiative. The No Place Like Home initiative, when implemented, will earmark state level MHSA funds for permanent supportive housing for persons with serious mental illness. • $.2 million for start-up funding to establish a 24 bed transitional residential facility for transition age youth at the County’s Oak Grove facility. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 925 • $2.5 million for expansion of the Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment (EPSDT) program for children to meet new state expanded eligibility requirements, and to meet reform legislation for services to foster children. • $.7 million to expand the county operated First Hope program’s capability to now serve adolescents and young adults experiencing a first psychotic break. • $.5 million to support expanding the hours of availability for the County funded mobile response team to respond to children and their families when in crisis. • $.5 million to augment and expand the capacity of the County’s Mental; Health Evaluation Team (MHET) in order to field a countywide mobile crisis response intervention for adults experiencing mental health crises. • $.7 million to establish two new Innovative Projects; one to bring mental health services to seriously mentally ill adults living in augmented board and care facilities, and one to serve adolescents experiencing mental health and substance abuse disorders. This $.7 million will be offset by the ending of two Innovative Projects that sunset in current fiscal year. • $.6 million to establish a family support program consisting of recruiting, training and supervising volunteers to support family members and loved ones of persons experiencing serious emotional disturbance or mental illness. • $.2 million to expand various training and staff development initiatives; most notably certifying mental health first aid trainers to partner with first responders and community organizations supporting persons experiencing trauma and violence. • $.3 million to establish a locally administered student loan forgiveness program to address identified significant workforce shortages, such as psychiatrists. • $1.3 million (or 3%) added to allow for both County and contract operated increases in the cost of doing business. We anticipate that the plan’s proposed total budget spending authority will not need to be reduced in the foreseeable future, and that all MHSA programs and plan elements can be sustained at their proposed level of funding. Again, we welcome both Public and Commission input this evening. The Draft Three Year Plan will be sent to the Board of Supervisors for review once we have included our written response to any substantive recommendations for revisions received by either the Public or the Commission. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 926 MENTAL HEALTH COMMISSION MONTHLY MEETING MINUTES Hosting the Public Hearing, on the Fiscal Years 2017 to 2020 For the Mental Health Services Act Three Year Program and Expenditure Plan May 3, 2017 – First Draft Agenda Item / Discussion Action / Follow-Up I. Call to Order / Introductions The Chair of the Commission, Duane Chapman, called the meeting to order at 4:38pm. Members Present: Chair -Duane Chapman, District I Vice Chair- Barbara Serwin, District II Supv. Candace Andersen, District II Diana MaKieve, District II Gina Swirsding, District I Douglas Dunn, District III (arrived @4:43pm) Meghan Cullen, District V Lauren Rettagliata, District II Mike Ward, District V Commissioners Absent: Sam Yoshioka, District IV Connie Steers, District III Jason Tanseco, District IV Other Attendees: Warren Hayes, MHSA Program Manager of Behavioral Health Adam Down, Behavioral Health Services Admin Jill Ray, Field Rep Supv. Andersen’s Office, District II Roberto Roman, Office for Consumer Empowerment Guita Goudarzi, AOD liaison Charles Madison, President of NAMI Sharon Madison, NAMI Kanwarpal Dhaliwal, RYSE Center Organization Kassie Perkins, ANKI BHI Sheri Richards, CPAW Judy Cohen, NAMI Mark Cohen, NAMI Kristen Clapton, CCBH Teresa Pasquini, Family member Robert Thigpen, CCBH Anne Sutherland, AOD Chair Don Green, NAMI PG- Soto Barbara Scott, NAMI Kay Derrico, NAMI Melinda Mehan, CCBH Liza A. Molina-Huntley, Executive Assistant for MHC EA-Transfer recording to computer June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 927 **The attendees had the privilege to hear Mr. Roberto Roman singing at the beginning of the meeting. All in attendance enjoyed his talented voice. II. Proclamation to declare May as Mental Health Awareness Month • Supervisor Candace Andersen – summarized the Proclamation stated that it was passed on May 2, at the Board of Supervisor’s meeting. All the Board of Supervisors have signed the proclamation and had great things to say about the Mental Health Commission. Her remarks focused on how important it is that we continue to work to destigmatize mental health. Everyone has been touched by someone who has had challenges due to mental illness. We need to continue to advocate improving the lives of those who suffer with mental illness. Provided and presented the official proclamation, on behalf of the Board of Supervisors. Thank you to everyone for all that you do. III. CREATE an ad hoc committee to screen Mental Health Commission applicants, to forward to the Board of Supervisors for approval and appointment. • Duane- referred discussion to Supervisor Andersen due to some concerns. We need to remember that the Board of Supervisors appoints our member that is the first step is. The next step should be, but our Bylaws say something different than the Contra Costa Advisory Body Handbook does. I will let Supervisor Andersen take over from here. • Supervisor Andersen- We are in the process of making a brochure, kudos to Liza who made a really nice brochure about the Mental Health Commission. Supervisor Mitchoff did express yesterday that her concern, which she expressed previously, about her desire to appoint Mental Health Commissioners before anyone else talks to them or screened. She doesn’t like that screening process. What she would like to do is to have Supervisors appoint whoever they want to, as long as the person meets the required statutory requirements of being a consumer, a family member or at large. Then any interaction with the rest of the Commission would take place after that point through an orientation with the Chair or the Committee members. In the past, we have been doing that at times, we haven’t always had someone from the Commission reviewing them first. It is a really important thing to Supervisor Mitchoff so we will be bringing that to the Mental Health Commission, a revision of the Bylaws and to the Board of Supervisors that would change that process to mirror the Advisory Board Handbook. The Supervisor would appoint someone and then after that they can interaction would take place with the Commissioners. • Gina- When I am out in my district and I see somebody, I can approach a person with the brochure. I am in the district with Supervisor John Gioia. Why I am saying that is because I talk to a lot of people and tell them about our commitment. The first thing that they ask is: are the meetings in West County? Because it is hard for everyone to come out, a lot of people have transportation issues. • Supervisor Andersen- This brochure will be very helpful and we want you recruiting members, if you have a vacant seat. Let’s let it go through the Supervisor and let them make that decision and then they will meet the Commission afterwards. Please continue recruiting. What Karen was concerned about was a formal recommendation by the Mental Health Commission; she just wants to make that decision, then following that decision the interaction with the Commission. • Barbara- I’m just curious on what her perspective is and what commandeer that she wants that? • Supervisor Andersen- The perspective is that, she is ultimately making the appointment, she wants to make that decision and would rather have potential June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 928 Commissioners sit in on a Commission meeting and then come talk to me about it and hear about their thoughts regarding the role of a Commissioner. She wants her own independent decision; she doesn’t want people to tell her if that person should be on the board. She expressed a strong preference for her making the decision; an appointment can take place and then have an orientation follow up. Historically, we have done the appointment and an orientation done post appointment, with the Chair or an ad hoc committee that explains the full details regarding what the Commission does and what their roles are. Talking to the person, we never had anyone rejected because of it. For that reason, in reference to Supervisor Mitchoff and then the other possibility would be to send the whole thing to internal operations and have a drag out discussion. • Diana- I think one of the biggest concerns that I have about that is that the Supervisor feels to have somebody placed on the Commission is to have somebody in front of their face. We, on the Commission, are very aware of the fact that we are down five Commissioners right now and that makes it difficult for us to do our job. So if we can’t get out there and try to find people and recruit, it makes it harder on us. • Supervisor Andersen- Yes you can, with this process in no way do we stop you from recruiting. I think that Supervisor’s Mitchoff’s concern is having a practice where when someone applies they have to go before an ad hoc committee for a recommendation, as well as meeting her. She did not think that having an ad hoc committee helps. • Diana- So does that mean that we don’t have a role or voice in whom comes on to the Commission? • Supervisor Andersen- in a nice way, no. It is her decision on who she appoints for her district and she wants to have the first interface that person has that’s going to operate in the role as a Commissioner. That in no way limits Commissioners from going out and recruiting and stating what district openings there are and having that conversation and refer them to their District office. • Doug- In my experience, my name was discussed at the Commission and was issued and appointed by my district supervisor. • Lauren- the procedure was, when I was Chair, was that people could apply through their Supervisor’s office or contacting through the Executive Assistance or directly through the CAO’s office, they could send an application. The applications were received and our Executive Assistant would verify if they lived in the county and what district they lived in. Then we would interview these people. When I went to my interview there was another gentleman that was also interviewing for the same position and I was interviewed by the whole Commission. I was fortunate that I was picked in the interview. California State law does not state or outline the exact procedure of the appointment. • Teresa- So this is nothing new that I’m hearing here in terms that there’s always been some Supervisor’s that feel very strongly about this, it’s not only Supervisor Mitchoff that has this strong feeling, I believe John Gioia also has that feeling, maybe not as much now as he did at one time. I think that it’s unfortunate the Supervisor has the right to self-appoint and direct appoint. I was direct appointed, as Doug just said. I can tell you that I wished that that wouldn’t have happened to me that was a very uncomfortable position for me to be in. I actually came into a room; I believe Diane is here, I believe she was the Vice Chair at the time when I appointed. I came into a room full of people that didn’t know who I was, and it wasn’t friendly, quite frankly, so I think that it’s too bad that there can’t be some kind of middle ground here? I think absolutely Supervisor Mitchoff is correct, that it is ultimately her decision and that there has always been that power struggle June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 929 going back and forth. Ultimately you want to make sure that you have public volunteers that feel comfortable coming to a table with people and know what there is, there should be more interchange. • Supervisor Andersen- and that is where I’m hoping with this whole change in Bylaws, that we can have, when someone is appointed that this when we can focus on the orientation, and inform of the duties and responsibilities as a Mental Health Commissioners, this is how they operate, here’s an introduction to the subcommittees and their vacancies and coming and sitting in on a meeting before being on the commission. • Gina- like Teresa, I also did feel a little bit out of place. I think one thing that is nice about it, if we tell them what’s expected and we let them ask questions and we shared our experience. A lot of it is getting to know each other. • Barbara- Just a couple of things, in terms of that interview process, that ability to interact with the Commissioners was really important, in my experience. I also feel that it shows transparency and that’s important. When the application is put out there, it’s for a Committee to review. • Teresa- I think it’s been almost two years that I was on this Commission and my seat is still vacant, which is absolutely inexcusable! I am making a public statement to the Commission, as a former Commissioner, that it deeply offends me that such an important position, there has been a lot of community uproar in West County and there is no representative for people, other than Duane and Gina, and I’m still getting phone calls, and so. So I’m happy to say that to John Gioia and I’m happy to say it to anybody, but my point is that if you’re going to amend the Bylaws and ask that these direct appointments from the Board, then they need to make sure that happens. • Supervisor Andersen- They absolutely do. I agree 100% and I don’t want any of this to stop anyone’s desire to be out in the community recruiting people. • Duane- so this is what we’re going to do- everything is on hold for right now, except we are still going to go out there and recruit people. Keep recruiting. I am going to check with the California Association of local Behavioral Health Boards and Committees and see how other people are doing it and get some support from them and CAL OSHA, and get some support from them and directions from them, in writing, and that way we will then meet with the Supervisor and let her know what we have come across and see if we can come to a happy medium. I think that’s the best way to do it. • Supervisor Andersen- I am going to weigh in on this and I am going to peacefully find the least objection that we can still accomplish what we want to do which is to get new Commissioners oriented to the norms of this Commission and get them excited about being here. • Duane- do we need a vote on this? No, we are leaving it as is. IV. RECEIVE introduction to 1420 Willow Pass renovation and CREATE an ad hoc committee for continuing review of the project by Adam Down. • Duane- This is a new project that there was some discussion about and Adam will inform the rest of the board. • Adam- Thank you for putting this in a crowded meeting agenda. I often work for the Commission and one of my other roles is that I also work on facilities with the department. Many of you have visited or worked or done something at the 1420 Willow Pass clinic, which is a centered Concord adult’s mental health clinic. It can use some work, I think anyone who has visited would agree with that statement. There is an opportunity to June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 930 improve it, the vocational unit had been downstairs, and it was vacated three years ago. The main area upstairs, on the second floor has been continued to be filled with staff members and clients, it’s a very busy clinic and creates an environment that is less than welcoming. We feel like we can accomplish quite a bit with some renovations there and expanding, decompressing staff, into that lower level unit. The process of where we’re at right now, we engaged the general service department, professional services, consultation and project feasibility early on. We worked with the employees on site, cross section employees, we had nurses, doctors, clinicians, management and a clerk, everybody sat around and asked- what can we do here to make this better for you? We really zeroed in on a few things, the very important we heard them from Commissioners as they’ve gone and you can see it when you just walk in yourself. The preliminary design that we put forward for approval- to increase lobby, patient waiting area size, decompression of various staff members in the clinic, improved clerical work function, better patient circulation, additional treatment rooms, and a creation of a welcoming environment, including removing the Sheriff’s station that is front and center as you walk in the door. We know that it was important to many people. What I hear today, we are looking at about $980,000 in total budget. Of that, $700,000 is construction costs, approximately. What was proposed to the Executive Board, and forwarded to this meeting, was to get an ad hoc committee, assign a smaller number of people that we would like to work, as we move forward, to ensure that the public process has been followed, that you are able to accurately advise and inform the Board and the Mental Health Director and your aware of the project as we promised. With that I would like to turn it over to you for any questions or to appoint an ad hoc committee that I will work with going forward to keep bouncing the ideas and report back to the Commission at future meetings. • Lauren- As some of my fellow Commissioners may not be aware that my day work is that I have commercial properties and that I am required, as an owner of commercial properties to work with some of my leaser’s to do renovations’. The one thing that I wanted to point out to our Supervisor Andersen is that the County does not own this building and putting in $980,000 into a building that we do not own maybe warranted but I know that when I have leasers’ come to me when they have to do renovations there is usually an agreement worked out because leasers are very concerned that they can put massive renovations and then only have like a three to five year lease. Usually you then negotiate a longer term lease that incorporates the amount of money that the leaser is putting into the building. Also, every time I go into negotiations with the leasers, if flooring, walking and carpeting are in deteriorating conditions, such as they are at the 1420 Willow Pass property, the owner of the property, usually finances the funds of this type of renovation. I am pretty familiar with renovations and what it takes negotiate them. It does seem like a lot of money but I haven’t done one in the last five years in California. I would ask the Supervisors since this is a lot of money, every dollar that we spend on renovations can possibly be used for care. I understand that this is coming June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 931 out of the general fund. • Supervisor Andersen- Do you know the term of the lease that there is on that building? (Adam) • Adam- I believe we are in there right now until 2020? Public Works Real Estate is engaged in this project as well. • Supervisor Andersen- I know we have a pretty good real estate department and let me share some of this with you- the reality is that many of our federal and state programs, we will be reimbursed for lease payments, we will not be reimbursed for a building that we own. So it has been beneficial for us to lease and rent buildings, rather than own them, because then we wouldn’t have the reimbursement funds. It is also much cheaper for us to contract, with an outside building with a property management company because they then maintain the building, the provide custodial services and using our own public works labor, to maintain custodial staff is really very expensive when you add all the county benefits. It’s generally much more cost effective to lease a building, for its intended purpose but we do have real estate professionals who manage the county’s leases and do work out details like getting credit for the property improvements and lease terms. I don’t want anyone to think that no is watching the store and we are just throwing money out here. • Lauren- I had significant questions because on the Oak Grove property that the County did purchase, it seems like sometimes the County isn’t making the wisest decisions when it comes to real estate decisions that they make that deal with mental health. • Supervisor Andersen- that’s pretty hard if you are going to another location on Oak Grove • Lauren- this is a good location, I am just asking that we really do, do due diligence with public works or whoever is negotiating. Because the building, if they are supposed to be maintaining that building for you? I know that at one time Public Works came in to clean the carpets, the building has been in a very deteriorated state, always has been for the last four years and it’s not what I would consider a public building at all. That is my two cents and I just want the very best for the people. • Adam- We are hoping that the ad hoc committee will have a real understanding and we will present this to them. We haven’t engaged that far, we have merely scoped out a proposal, that at this point it’s still preliminary. That information will be forthcoming, that is the point of forming the ad hoc committee so we can continue to work and make sure that your concerns are met and others concerns are met. • Gina- It’s really interesting because in West County they built a new clinic, which is beautiful, it’s only medical and the mental health section is at a whole other place. I have visited the Concord clinic, what I like about is that it has the medical part is connected so patients are able to get all the help right there. Where in West County, it’s not connected and they have to go to two different places, it’s hard to get to and not easy if your handicapped or in a wheelchair. One of the major problems in West County is for consumers to get their lab work done, it’s very difficult for them due June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 932 to transportation and they are on a limited income and have to go to two places. I think it’s great that it’s combined in Concord. • Lauren- West County is opening up space there. • Gina- yes, that’s in process, I know that. • Duane- With that being said, I am going to ask for volunteers from the Commission, to be on the ad hoc committee. Who wants to volunteer for it? Lauren, ok, Gina ok, anyone else, public? • Adam- I would like to propose one of the new Commission members- Michael or Meghan, this a meeting that I can be flexible around your schedules. It does not have to be a set meeting; we can work around and make it work for the people who are involved, if that’s ok? • Duane- ok so far I have Gina and Lauren and Meghan, if Meghan cannot make a meeting, then Michael will attend as an alternate. • Adam- we will be flexible around your schedule (Meghan) • Duane- Then that is that, thank you very much for volunteering V. APPROVE minutes from April 5, 2017 meeting Motion to approve the minutes was made by Gina, Doug seconded the motion • No corrections required • VOTE: 9-0-0 • YAYS: Supervisor Andersen, Duane, Barbara, Gina, Diana, Doug, Lauren, Mike and Meghan • NAYS: none ABSTAIN: none • ABSENT: Sam, Connie, Jason VI. Duane adjourned the Mental Health Commission meeting at 5:21 pm in the memory of the Behavioral Health Director’s father who just passed, Vernon Belon and also in the memory of a young man, who committed suicide, because of the two people we share in a moment of silence. I. The Chair, called to order- The Public Hearing on the Mental Health Services Act Three Year Program and Expenditure Plan at 5:22 pm II. Opening Comments by the Mental Health Commission Chair- Duane Chapman. • Everyone can read, so I am moving on and we will allow three minutes time for each speaker. We are here are to confirm and complete the process. Warren, can you start the process? III. Fiscal Years 2017 to 2020 Mental Health Services Act (MHSA) Three Year Program and Expenditure Plan- by Warren Hayes, MHSA Program Manager • Warren- First of all, I would like to thank the Commission for putting in a big chunk of their time to host the public hearing which is required by statue and regulations and I believe they are listed here. It has been my privilege to provide support for the stakeholder process that started last summer when our consolidated planning advisory work group did the planning and were the helping hands for our community forums that were held in October, November and December. Those were designed to solicit in several venues interactive dialogue around the needs and priorities for the County regarding mental health. In January and February the information was reviewed, that we got from the community forums as well June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 933 as to review a quantitative needs assessment that looked at Behavioral Health needs from a little different lens. In March we held a joint meeting, the Consolidated Advisory Planning Workgroup (CPAW) and the Mental Health Commission members were invited to have an informal discussion regarding the draft of the Three Year Program and Expenditure Plan. Then we got into the formal part of the process, whereby we posted the draft on the website, changes were made as a result of the informal discussions with CPAW and the Mental Health Commission members. We then posted the corrected draft, for a public comment period of 30 days. That is required also by law. The Commission then hosts, this event, which is a public hearing, which is a formal event. As much as I would love to get into discussions and dialogue about the three year plan, this event this evening is really for the public to provide comment, as well as the Commission members to provide comment and then have the comments listed from both the public and Commissioners, as it is listed on the agenda. We are in the formal period, which means that if you sent me an email asking why we are doing something, at this point we will discuss it, give me a call. A lot of you take advantage of that and I very much enjoy those discussions, they are off the record but they are really important because this is not a simple process. The Mental Health Services Act (MHSA) dollars have lot of strings attached and I am happy to explain to those who would like a deeper knowledge of how these things come together. This process is all in preparation of the plan. After this evening, we will then provide a formal written response to the public comments that came in the 30 day period, the public comments tonight, as well as the Commission’s comments and any potential recommendations. That will all go into the three year plan and soon as we get a response to those and get it approved by my boss, the Behavioral Health Director, we will send it to the County’s Administrator’s Office for putting the plan on the agenda, for the Board of Supervisors. We hope to have this before the Board of Supervisor’s for their consideration, sometime in June, so that hopefully we have a plan in place starting July 1, which is the start of the three year period. • Duane- ok, with that I am first going to ask for public comments, regarding the plan. • Warren- Duane, one last thing here is there is a two page public hearing presentation, that’s in your materials. I had put this together as a two page summary that is in your packet. I can read that into the record if you’d like, the last three years I have read the summary so it shows up in the minutes. • Supervisor Andersen- I don’t know why you need to read it into the agenda to have it part of the minutes? We can hand it over to Melinda and have it be made part of the minutes, unless you really want to read the whole thing in? • Warren- No, this is really up to the Commission folks. • Supervisor Andersen- I have read it, has everyone on the Commission read it? I’d hate to have you recite it unnecessarily. • Warren- I think your points well taken. Right after the draft minutes, which were just approved, which is page six, then the next page is Adam’s report June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 934 on Willow Pass, but after that is the two page summary. If you have not read it you might want to take a look at while there’s public comment? • Duane- Yes, let’s start the public comment IV. Public Comment regarding the Plan- (Transcribed by Melinda Mehan @47:12 on the audio recording) • Duane- I will start first by calling Mr. Charles Madison. Please everyone speak loud enough so we can get it on the recording. Thank you. • Charles Madison- I want to first thank Warren and his group for finally getting a 3-Year Plan together that is readable. For so many years, you had to hunt all over the document to find out what area you were dealing with, and so now we have a program where you can actually look at something. My hat’s off to you. Thank you so much for getting that into the program. Secondly, I want to thank the County and I want to thank CPAW for recognizing and adding families into this. I’m speaking as a family member here, and that we are so happy to see that there is an allocation to support families in the 3-year program, and that’s pretty much what I’ve got to say, so thank you very much, everybody, and thank you, Warren. • Mary Ann Andrews- First, I would like to thank the County, CPAW, and all others concerned that a program to support families has been shown in the budget. It’s very important to have families supported through these programs for the health and wellness of their loved ones. I understand family members can be tossed around by the whirlwind that is mental health. These programs help educate families to become aware of how to handle and understand their loved ones. It cannot be easy to have a loved one with mental illness, and how to deal with the effects are not always obvious. When do I call to have my loved one hospitalized, and did I do the right thing? Why these suicide cries? What is real, and what is not real? These struggles and so many more can be overwhelming at best. It is important for family members to know that they are not alone as they struggle with the devastation that mental illness can leave behind. To help them to try to understand something that is sometimes not understandable is no easy task, but with these funds, this task can be started. I know that these funds will go to promote awareness and compassionate understanding of mental illness as a real disease; so again, I would like to thank you for your support of family members. • Sharon Madison- I am piggy-backing off of the people who just spoke before me, that I definitely want to express this to everybody, and I really want to acknowledge that the Mental Health Commission, our County, our supervisors, and their recognition of the vital role that families do play in the mental health treatment plans for our loved ones. We’ve been waiting for this for a long, long time. For some reason, we’ve been put out in the field like we weren’t part of this, and when we look at all these treatment plans and programs and whatever, it becomes quite evident that a lot of the burden of these illnesses falls on the family. So I know I have said this before, but I do want to reiterate this, that I feel that what better gift we can give someone who is living with a mental illness than an educated family. Thank you. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 935 • Anne Sutherland- Thank you for taking my comments and questions. I am a local physician. I was appointed as a member-at-large on the Alcohol and Other Drugs Advisory Committee and was immediately elected chairman, so I’m new at this. I’m trying to educate myself. I originally wanted to be of service. So please educate me. I read through as much of this as I could, and just as mental health has been marginalized in the community, I’m getting the impression that substance use disorders are marginalized within the mental health community. Please prove me wrong. I looked through this, and I did not see any services specifically allocated for substance use disorders. We have two full-time paid staff members and a lot of volunteers, and other than that, my impression is that we don’t have much in the way of funds allocated. My simplest question is, is anything going to be done about getting rid of alcohol and drugs in homeless shelters, because people with substance use disorders go through rehab; it’s an expensive process, a lot of them don’t have homes to go back to; their families end up getting wrecked by their disease, and when they go back to homeless shelters, it’s my understanding that a lot of these are called “wet”; there are drugs and alcohol in the homeless shelters, and it ends up being a revolving door for these people. The time and money that were spent on them is wasted, because they relapse. The second part of my question is that substance use disorders are now considered to be a mental disability. What’s being done to integrate them into the mental health services at large? • Kanwarpal Dhaliwal- Good evening; I’m with the RYSE Center in Richmond. This is the first time I’ve been to a Commission meeting. It’s good to be here. I’ve attended CPAW meetings. Also, I want to echo the suggestion/request to maybe also move meetings around to different regions of the County. It is not easy to get here, and for those of us working in other regions, to be coming to Central County 2-3 times a week is actually pretty challenging. I would just ask that consideration. What I want to talk about is a few things. One is just the appreciation of the work, the struggle, the healthy struggle. Sometimes it doesn’t feel healthy. It really is sort of figuring out how do we ensure that the most structurally vulnerable communities get what we need and what we deserve. And I know that it is no simple feat to do, and I just want to appreciate that work. And in that spirit, I also offer one of the things that we think is really important to start to look at is the sense and idea of atmosphere of trauma, atmosphere of distress. Our young people in our communities talk all the time everywhere they go that they feel threatened, whether it’s the system, whether it’s going into Target, whether it’s going to City Hall, that fact and there’s the stress that’s happening all the time. I think we are starting to try to figure out how to address that more holistically. I really want to offer and hope I can work with any and all of you on, on behalf of RYSE, on behalf of the providers that we work with in West County, is how do we really address this holistically so that all the levels of mental health or the distress actually are addressed more holistically when we see the relationship between all of them. I think that sometimes for us what feels challenging about just June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 936 looking at episodic or individual. Understanding that what happens in our bodies and our minds and our relationships is also related to the social conditions that we’re in, and so we really want to push that, and that the solutions are community-grounded, community-rooted. Yes, we all know there’s a lot going on in West County, and there’s a lot of challenge, and we really feel like we need our services to come from a place of seeing or being part of humanity and not having to be systematized or put into a system before we get anything. Thank you. • Teresa Pasquini- I actually didn’t plan on making a public comment; I came to listen today. But I, too, would like to compliment the Commission and CPAW on the Community Planning process. I have been a part of the planning process for these 3-Year Plans since the inception of the MHSA, and I do see a simpler plan to read and follow. I am also happy to see attention given to the families that the Commission has long advocated for. I’ll be curious to see how those plans are implemented and how effective they are. I think it’s very important to have family support and education, but it doesn’t do us any good to educate on how to navigate a broken system, and I can’t emphasize enough how the system is still very broken and fragmented, even though we do have some really wonderful programs in place. I did want to share that I had the privilege of attending a Laura's Law court session last week. Somebody I have advocated for over 12-13 months to get into the program was actually finally found. Even though she had hit our Psych Emergency door and/or 4C door 6-7 times and also hospitalized in Marin General and had been referred, but then lost, she was found. I did have the privilege of attending a court session. She had invited me in. I’m not her family member, so we do have a lot of consumers who need advocates – strong advocates – who do not have family members to support them. Gina, this is sort of for you, because I know how you feel about Laura's Law. So I actually pushed – I was told it’s a closed session, and I said, “If a consumer is struggling with going to court and they are afraid of going to court, and they have invited somebody to come with them, can we just ask why somebody couldn’t be invited in?” And so I was told I had to go and sit in the hallway, which I did do. The Public Defender did invite me in at the request of the consumer. It is supposed to be a consumer-driven process, and so I would like to encourage – I still haven’t seen a meeting come forward about our Laura's Law, but the last time I was here, I requested. I haven’t seen a community meeting planned. I am really very strongly interested in seeing some changes and some improvements in our Laura's Law process. Last but not least, housing-housing-housing. Housing and transitional care. You all know the story of my Danny. I believe most of you know the story of my Danny. He is currently in an out-of-county placement, and he is doing amazing, very, very well. And as you know, he’s been 5150’d over 50 times in his life. The trauma of that is very serious. He’s been sent out of County to locked facilities for most of his adult life. This started at 18; he’s going to turn 35 in August. We’re hoping for him to be able to come back, but I had a conversation with his conservator today, and I don’t feel there’s June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 937 a program available in Contra Costa County that would adequately provide his needs. I didn’t see anything in this plan that would support consumers who do not require to be in a locked facility that could come back into our community and transition back and be supported. I would strongly encourage the Commission, CPAW, and the Board to explore new contracts with new providers. There are programs out there like Synergy in Morgan Hill. Synergy is opening another program in Sacramento. We have to start thinking outside of the box for the people who have been in a box or locked up, you know, “out of sight; out of mind,” for most of their lives, and that is true trauma. I would just really strongly encourage – I don’t know if there’s anything in the plan; I didn’t see anything. I am happy to see the Oak Grove finally come around; however, I would really like to also comment that that’s not something really to celebrate, because that was actually on my agenda 6 years ago. I don’t know what’s taken so long, so that’s a little frustrating as well. So I celebrate the good things and the positive things, but we have a long way to go. Thank you. V. Commissioner Comments- • Duane Chapman- As a Commissioner, I’m glad to see that we are concentrating on the family. Family means a lot to everybody, and I don’t tell everybody a lot that I have 3 people in my family that suffer with their mental health, one died, and I have two others that I take care of. Family is very important; to understand to make sure you’re doing the right thing. How many times I’ve called the police. How many times I have fought with my brothers and sister to do the right thing, and when I read this and saw that there was going to be a lot of attention to family, I said, “Right on.” However, we still have a lack and a broken service. Yes, we’re not perfect. The County is not perfect. But as a Commissioner, I ask you, and as the Chair of this Commission, if you see something that needs to be paid attention to, stop, write it down, and send it to me. Because if it’s in writing, it’s better than saying it. And then with that, we have something to take to the Board of Supervisors. But you know, people can say anything they want to say. If you don’t get up and say it in front of the Board, or you don’t put it in writing, guess what? It didn’t happen. So I know we have a lot of energy and a lot of concerns, but if you have a problem you think about that young man who committed suicide earlier this month. It took me back, and I want to make sure that as many people as we can save, we do it together. Thank you. • Lauren Rettagliata- I did submit them via writing, and I will leave Melinda a copy. My first comment is, I have a number of comments, I have drilled down, and I am going to drill down into the housing section. Because housing was cited as the number one thing that needs to be addressed at our Community Planning Process by the people who attended; housing and supportive housing. Yet, if you’ll note in the vision statement, there is not one thing that is mentioned about providing housing through our mental health services plan. So I would like that to be addressed. I think there needs to be a statement in the vision that we as a community have addressed housing and supportive housing as our number one need. It wasn’t just this year; it’s been for the last 3 planning meetings I’ve been at. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 938 In the Needs Assessment on page 10 clearly calls and this is the quantitative study that was done by the Mental Health Department, clearly called for improved capacity to assist consumers who move from locked facilities to community based services. Yet this is not addressed in the Plan. It was called out as being much needed. It was called out in the Quantitative Needs Assessment. It was called out at the Community Planning Process meetings. It has been continually called out at Mental Health Commission meetings. There is no provision for this in the 3-Year Plan. The lack of housing and the correct supportive housing was identified as the number one need. The $1.7 million funding in the Plan is not new money but old money that was not used. It is designated for permanent housing and not for transitional housing, which is integral to a workable system of care. “No Place Like Home” program funding cannot be used for this essential treatment and care element, so I think we really have to address it, and we cannot wait for the next 3-Year Plan to do this. shelters are listed under housing services. Shelters are not housing. Shelters are emergency services. Shelters need to have their own designation under emergency services. Since MHSA funding is the major source of the shelters, what provision in the County System of Care Plan assures that beds for those with a serious mental illness receive priority? What are we doing to assure that patients from Psych Emergency, Contra Costa Regional Medical Center, 4C, Miller Wellness, and Hope House and Full Service Partnerships have access to this emergency service? MHSA clearly states that the funding is to be directed for the use of those with a serious mental illness – not a mental health condition, not for someone in temporary trauma, but for serious mental illness. This Commission worked diligently for two years to develop a program and fiscal review process. We now have an excellent tool to evaluate every program funded with MHSA funds, that are contracted, and also that are performed by our own county. Of the last seven programs evaluated, all seven were found deficient in effective communication between the contract manager and the contractor. How are we going to remedy this was not addressed in the 3-Year Plan. Almost all of the augmented board and cares had findings that required further attention in quality assurance and staffing sufficient for the program. There were also medication; there were very many deficiencies. So my question is, we should have in this 3- Year Plan, because we knew we had this problem, we should have addressed what are we going to do if we have to shut down an augmented board and care, because this is a real possibility. As you know, I went on some of the facilities. Some of them looked pretty good, but actually there were many recommendations were being made that what was happening was people were being placed out into augmented board and cares and really never heard from again. They were disconnected with their case management. That was noted by Warren’s team that went out. So these people may not be using our emergency rooms; they’re not really receiving treatment and care, and we may have to shut down some of these augmented board and cares. So my question is I think this 3-Year Plan June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 939 should address and have money provided for what happens to these people if we do have to go in and shut down an augmented board and care. And my question is, with the tool that we have before us, with the program and fiscal reviews, who is held responsible to see that deficiencies are corrected? Will the contracted agency be allocated the MHSA funding if these deficiencies are not corrected? If we shut down augmented board and cares, where do the residents go? And where is the plan to house these residents if the placement they are currently in is not providing care? Then on page 20, there was an attempt to address housing, and it says, relevant program/planning elements: Sufficient affordable housing for all consumers of Contra Costa Behavioral Health Services is not what MHSA, that these funds cannot really be used, there’s no way that we can address the 3,800 homeless residents that we have. But what I’m saying we can’t just dismiss that we have 3,800 homeless and say MHSA funding can’t address this. MHSA funding is asked to address the housing needs of those who are severely and persistently mentally ill. Where it ends, where we need that critical gap to provide traditional housing for those leaving locked facilities and those who are housed in a full service partnership. In February 2016, full service partners came to a Mental Health Services Act committee meeting and let us know that 10% of those that they serve were homeless. This homelessness was not by choice, I don’t believe. I think many times it is because the alternative is an abysmal living situation, many times situated in what we call a drug corridor, many times in room and boards that are bedbug infested, and many times in areas and shelters that are hidden from public view. Supportive housing, on page 38, Shelter Inc. 119 units, $2.281 million. What is used to assure that those who receive one of the 119 units have received a diagnosis of severe mental illness? I know we used the LOCUS and the CALOCUS, but these units are for the severely and persistently mentally ill, so is a physician’s assessment required for these people? How do we assure that the people living in these 119 units are severely and persistently mentally ill? Do we do a check every three years, do we do a check every four years, what do we do? We have now have an MHSA plan for at least eight years, yet we have the same conditions getting even worse. We have to ask ourselves, for 8 years we have had MHSA funding for the limited future, and as you know, the Commission wrote the White Paper and we showed that conditions for the severely mentally ill are not improving in this county. So, is what we’re doing the right use of the funding? Though intake times have improved for those with a serious mental illness, treatment time and the ability to see a psychiatrist at the clinics has not improved, and I thank Warren and his team for the placing in the Workforce Education and Training (WET), at least it’s an attempt to draw psychiatrists into our county. What method is used by our county to place MHSA contracts that are more than $250,000 out for re-bid at least every five years? Without having a request for a proposal opportunity every so many years, the County loses the ability to be assured that the best services are being provided by the best contractors. I know that, because I’ve been reading the plans now for June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 940 five years, I’ve never seen anything go out for a re-bid on a request for a proposal. I appreciate the time that everyone has had to take notes on this. • Gina Swirsding- One of the things I’m really glad, looking over the plan, is that because we did have, from my part of the county, they came out to speak on their needs of trauma. Getting help for those, especially those who experience gun violence. I’ve been talking all throughout the County, mostly with police officers and first responders, paramedics. Because in many aspects of gun violence, the burden is actually a lot on them. And this was my experience, when I got shot at, there is no help. Even though I went to a group, at Herrick Hospital at an outpatient program, and they would never let me talk about it. In my experience with mental health, the reason why I’m mentally ill is because when I got assaulted in 1989, I did not talk, because the person who assaulted me died in the process of it. Not only did I get as being the victim, but also got visited by the homicide detectives. In my mind, I was thinking I was going to jail. And I still sometimes believe that, even though it’s been so long. I have this fear that I’m going to go to jail because this person died because I defended myself. When you don’t talk, you become mentally ill. So, when I got shot at, I started talking, and that’s when actually I think it was good. If you don’t, what happens is you have revenge, like I did. Why was I like that? Because actually in reality, I was really suicidal. I didn’t care. So why I’m saying this is I’ve been working with a lot of kids in my area, and a lot of them are traumatized. They’re functioning, they’re going to school, but a lot of them are traumatized because of gun violence. I’ll ask kids’ questions and then you see their little eyes open, and they start talking about what their experience is on the gun shooting they experienced. So if you can’t talk about it, then what happens is, if you’re a victim of gun violence, you start doing revenge. That’s why a lot of our gang members go out and shoot each other. So where did I get the help? Not from the psychiatric community, not from the police department, because they disassociate, not by the military, because they disassociate. I ended up talking to gang members, and that’s where I got my help. So I started asking around, where is the building, where I could go if I was a victim of gun violence? I couldn’t get help because there is no place. There’s a place for people who are sexually assaulted, for people with domestic violence, there’s places you could go and say, “Hey, I need help.” And they can help you through that process, but when it comes to gun violence, there is no place. I read an article about a woman that her daughter was shot, last year, at the Hilltop Mall. The woman is from Mill Valley and the daughter was too. This mom now is going to Richmond from Mill Valley, trying to find out why her daughter was shot. That is a response that people can have. So I don’t know what to do but the reason why I joined this Commission was because of just this matter of gun violence; which occurs in every part of this county. Even in Concord and I’ve heard about it in all different places. It’s increasing. So I just think there needs to be a place for people to go and there needs to be a small group. In a small group, where people who were shot at, can talk together about it. Like people with drug and alcohol, you have people who can relate and you get help that way. That’s how I get June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 941 help for my mental illness, talking to other people who have experienced the same thing. I’m joining the Commission again for another three years and this is one area I really want to be addressed. I know it may not be in this budget but I’m already working with some people in my county. I’d like to see this throughout the county, from East County to Central County and in West County. There are a lot of victims out there and they’re alone. But I’m glad, I read some of the stuff in the plan and I like it. So I want to say, you did listen to us. Supervisor Andersen- Warren is here to listen and accept the comments Duane- So we need to develop a list of comments and a list comments and recommendations to the County Mental Health Administration and to the Board of Supervisors. VI. Develop a list of Comments and Recommendations to the county mental health Administration (MHA) and to the Board of supervisors (BOS) Duane- I think we’ve heard everything today and I know that we have Melinda here and we have Liza, who will get all this information back to us as quickly as possible. One of the things as a Commission, we’re going to hand-deliver the comments that were said today, to the Board of Supervisors and we will ask them to read them, word by word. Warren- Duane, just so you know your statement will be part of the plan. Gina: Can a Community member still go to the Board of Supervisors to express some of their needs? Supv. Andersen: You always can go to the Board of Supervisors. We’re down to 2 minutes, because our meetings are so long. You have 2 minutes to make a public comment. Gina: No, before the June thing. Duane: Anyone else have anything to say that you think is important enough to give to the Board of Supervisors? You will go first, you have three minutes. Guita Bahramipour: Could you please describe on page B34, regarding First Hope and the budget is $1.6 Million. I just want to know how they can manage with such a little funding to manage this wonderful program. Warren: I’d be happy to talk to you in depth about the First Hope program. Duane: Excuse me, we are not having, nor open for discussion. Warren: It’s an excellent question I’d be happy to chat with you offline in depth about it. Sheri Richards: I wasn’t going to speak; I just wanted to listen and be a fly on the wall, so to speak. I want to say that I’ve been inspired at this meeting, hearing from AOD, hearing from Gina, that people that are in this Commission and people that volunteer are motivated because they have their own personal stories. For me it’s about older adults and I didn’t hear that this evening. I wanted that to go on the record. Something that I’ve said, I think I said it in one of the planning meetings, all the issues of housing, transportation, stigma, discrimination, add old age to that, and the voice for older adults just isn’t there. It’s my observation. What got me here was just simply curiosity, but it was also coming from a home of being the responsible person, I felt some sense of responsibility to bring June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 942 back the information to the Older Adult Committee and I’m so glad I came. What is missing is internal advocacy. It would have been really neat if someone in one of the areas said, “Hey, Sheri, this would really be a good meeting for you to go to.” Lauren nudged me at CPAW, and I think that was in the back of my mind, maybe this is what she was talking about. So I appreciate any communication, don’t hesitate, because new people like myself, I’m learning the ropes, and this doesn’t come naturally. People need encouragement to speak up and to voice what they are witness to. Thank you. Jill: So maybe, Warren, you could just give a little burb on what the deadline is to receive comments on this plan? Warren: Actually it is. I think Duane actually explained it quite nicely just now, which is that Melinda is our scribe. She gets all the comments. We then go into lockdown to sort it all out and officially respond to all the comments, and that then goes into the 3-Year Plan that the Board of Supervisors can see what the public comment period, because that started in March, and so this public hearing tonight actually is the culmination of that. Jill: So if anybody has comments on the final plan, go to the Board of Supervisors hearing and make their comments public at the Board of Supervisors, or submit them prior to that meeting? Warren: Yes Supv. Andersen: If you want a response, you have a few minutes left. Kanwarpal Dhaliwal: I would like to see a consideration of the emerging science around chronic stress, chronic trauma across the lifespan, so adverse childhood experiences, all of that. I don’t see any of that sort of in it and it’s definitely something I think is important and that we have an opportunity to integrate into what we already know. So I’d like to see the chronic trauma, chronic stress, ACEs kind of stuff, trauma-informed approaches be a part of it. I’d also like to really see, for the record, how we are addressing the trauma of racial aggression that plays out in all that we’re doing. Gina Swirsding: I want to echo what she said. That’s what lacks in psychiatry, is how to treat people with PTSD. I was placed on different types of medications because it mimics other things. My psychologist, who is a specialist for PTSD, was constantly fighting on my behalf, to get me off the medication that made me worse. I couldn’t sit and watch my favorite TV shows because PTSD mimics other mental illnesses so I was given the wrong medication which made me very aggressive. Being placed on the wrong medication can make a person more aggressive or even suicidal. When my psychiatrist, who worked at the Veterans Administration, fought for me to be finally taken off the wrong meds, I got better. There are a lot of medications and psychiatrists and they all handle trauma differently. It’s about finding the right doctor, to prescribe the right medication. They need to know how to handle people that have been through trauma. Especially if a person is older and taking other medications, due to other health problems, this is something that does need to be evaluated. Duane- Alright, with that, on behalf of the Commission, any other June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 943 comments? The only thing that I am going to ask everybody else to do is to make sure that you get one of these brochures. Especially all of you that came to visit today, become a Commissioner, and come have some fun. Like I so love, it’s not a ten hour job, ok. If there is nothing further and we are all in agreement? Commissioners- Yes! Duane- Then I call this meeting to end. VII. Public Hearing was adjourned at 6:20 pm Respectfully submitted, Liza Molina-Huntley Executive Assistant to the Mental Health Commission CCHS Behavioral Health Administration June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 944 Contra Costa Behavioral Health Services Administration Responses to Public Comments, Public Hearing and Mental Health Commission Comments and Recommendation As per Section 5848 of the California Welfare and Institutions Code the County shall summarize and analyze any substantive written recommendations for revisions by the public and/or the Mental Health Commission to the MHSA Three Year Program and Expenditure Plan. 30 DAY PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD No written public comments were received. PUBLIC HEARING a. Comment. We are getting a Three Year Plan that is readable and easy to follow. b. Comment. We are so happy to see that there is an allocation to support families in the Three Year Program. c. Comment. It is very important to have families supported through these programs for the health and wellness of their loved ones. d. Comment. I want to acknowledge that the Mental Health Commission, our County, and our Supervisors recognize the vital role that families do play in the mental health treatment plans for our loved ones. It is quite evident that a lot of the burden of these illnesses fall on the family. We have been waiting for this for a long, long time. e. Comment. I do not see any services specifically allocated for substance use disorders. What is being done to integrate them into the mental health services at large? Response. By law Mental Health Service Act funding can only be spent on individuals diagnosed with a serious mental illness, serious emotional disorder, or considered to be at risk for developing a serious mental illness. However, Contra Costa Behavioral Health Services (CCBHS) as a system of care includes treatment of substance use disorders as co-occurring with mental health issues. CCBHS’s Five Year Strategic Plan includes integration of these two systems as a key goal, and is actively working to provide a unified team approach. The MHSA Three Year Plan includes a new Innovation Project that will pilot providing an intensive outpatient treatment program offering three levels of care; intensive, transitional and continuing care to adolescents dually diagnosed with substance use and mental health disorders. (page 59) f. Comment. I would like to recommend that stakeholder meetings, such as Mental Health Commission meetings, move around to different regions of the County. It is not easy to get here. Response. Last fall the Community Program Planning Process for the Three Year Plan June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 945 conducted community forums located in each region of the County, and will look to placing stakeholder meetings and events this coming year in all three regions of the County (page 11). The recommendation to move Mental Health Commission meetings to different regions is forwarded to the Commission. g. Comment. How do we as service providers ensure that the most structurally vulnerable communities get what is needed and deserved? It is no simple feat to do, and I just want to appreciate that work. One of the things to start to look at is the sense and atmosphere of trauma and distress. We need to address this holistically, and come from a place of humanity, rather than be put into a system before we get anything. Response. The County agrees that our most vulnerable communities experience pervasive trauma. This needs to be better addressed by our care providers, whether in mental health clinics or community based organizations. Community based organizations, funded by our Prevention and Early Intervention component, are particularly well suited to develop promising practices for trauma informed care that can inform and transform our larger system. The Training and Technical Assistance category of the Three Year Plan’s Workforce Education and Training component provides funding for training in Mental Health First Aid. Care providers certified in this training will provide training and ongoing liaison to community and faith based organizations and agencies who are often first responders to community trauma, violence or natural disaster (page 63). h. Comment. I am strongly interested in seeing some changes and improvements in our Laura’s Law process. Response. The next Assisted Outpatient Treatment Workgroup meeting is scheduled for June 12. This will be an opportunity for our stakeholder community to hear about program updates and provide input pertaining to the AOT Program here in Contra Costa County. i. Comment. I don’t see anything in this plan that would support consumers who no longer are required to be in a locked facility and need to be supported with housing and services that would enable them to transition back into the community. Response. The County contracts with a number of licensed board and care providers and facilities to provide additional funds to augment the rental amount received by the facility from the SSI rental allowance. These additional funds pay for care to enable those with serious mental illness to avoid institutionalization and enable them to live in the community. Crestwood Healing Center has augmented board and care beds with a 16 bed Pathways program that provides clinical mental health specialty services for up to a year for those residents considered to be most compromised by mental health issues (page 36). The County recognizes that supportive housing services are insufficient to the need, due to the extreme shortage of affordable housing in the Bay Area. The state administered “No Place Like Home” initiative was recently enacted to dedicate in future years $2 billion in bond proceeds throughout the state to invest in the development of permanent supportive housing for persons who are seriously mentally ill June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 946 and are experiencing homelessness or at risk of chronic homelessness. County planning for responding to this initiative will begin as soon as state program guidelines are approved. It is anticipated that the MHSA Three Year Plan Update for fiscal year 2018-19 will contain a more definitive response to this opportunity (page 35). j. Comment. Appendix B of the plan indicates that the budget for the First Hope Program is $1.6 million. How can they manage with such little funding for this wonderful program? Response. Appendix B depicts First Hope’s budget for fiscal year 2016-17 (current year). The Three Year Plan (FY 2017-20) increases this budget to $2.4 million to not only serve youth who show early signs of psychosis, but expand services to serve youth who have recently experienced a first psychotic episode (page 50). k. Comment. All of the housing, transportation, stigma, discrimination issues affecting persons with mental illness; the voice for older adults just isn’t there. What is missing is internal advocacy for older adults. Response. The County agrees, and encourages interested individuals and other stakeholder groups, committees and workgroups to include and coordinate with the CCBHS sponsored Older Adult Committee and the Older Adult Program (pages 39-40) in order to better integrate and coordinate the full spectrum of services for older adults. MENTAL HEALTH COMMISSION COMMENTS Upon completion of the Public Comment period Mental Health Commission members provided individual comment and discussion. A summary of the topics are as follows: • Family is very important, and when I read that there was going to be a lot of attention to family, I said “Right on.” • Our mental system is not perfect, and needs attention. If you see something that needs attention, write it down and send it to the Commission, because if it is in writing we can address it and bring it to the Board of Supervisors. • I think there needs to be a statement in the Vision that we as a community have addressed housing and supportive housing as our number one need. Response. The Vision statement provides overall central themes as to how all care within Contra Costa Behavioral Health Services is provided. The chapter on the Community Program Planning Process is the more appropriate place in the plan to indicate the community’s prioritization of need, and does articulate the housing and homeless services has been afforded the highest priority (page 19). • The $1.7 million funding in the plan for permanent supportive housing is not new money, but old money that was not used. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 947 Response. The Special Needs Housing Program is a new, county administered program that is earmarked to provide permanent supportive housing assistance to the seriously mentally ill. It is being funded by previously state controlled MHSA dollars that were recently released for County use (page 37). • Transitional housing is integral to a workable system of care. I think we have to address it, and we cannot wait for the next Three Year Plan to do this. Response. Transitional housing is addressed in the current Three Year Plan. The County contracts with Telecare to operate a 16 bed residential facility that supports seriously mentally ill adults in order to avoid in-patient psychiatric hospitalization. It also serves consumers being discharged from the hospital and long term locked facilities that would benefit from a step-down from institutional care in order to successfully transition back into community living (page 34). Currently the County is in planning stages to re-purpose their county owned Oak Grove facility in Concord to establish a 24 bed residential treatment facility for youth ages 16-24. This will be a co-located residential and supportive services operation to provide voluntary community level treatment with safe and stable housing for the most vulnerable and at-risk youth who are experiencing serious mental health issues (pages 34-5). Crestwood Healing Center has augmented board and care beds with a 16 bed Pathways program that provides clinical mental health specialty services for up to a year for those residents considered to be most compromised by mental health issues (page 36). These MHSA funded programs are designed to be transitional, with consumers moving to more permanent living arrangements as they recover. However, affordable housing is so scarce that these programs have extreme difficulty in transitioning consumers to more permanent settings. Today’s model is to create more permanent, integrated subsidized housing for the seriously mentally ill, and then to bring the right level of care to them in order to enable the sustaining of independent living. The emerging “No Place Like Home” initiative that will be formulated during this Three Year Plan period is intended to address this shortage of affordable housing for the seriously mentally ill (pages 35-6). • Shelter beds are not housing. Shelters need to have their own designation under Emergency Services. What is the assurance that MHSA is funding only persons with a serious mental illness? Response. Temporary Shelter Beds is a correct designation for the temporary bed facilities that are provided for adults and transitional age youth in Contra Costa County. MHSA funding enables individuals with a serious mental illness or a serious emotional disturbance to receive temporary emergency housing in these facilities (page 36). The program and fiscal review conducted on this program indicated that MHSA only funded persons with a serious mental illness that were receiving mental health care from CCBHS, and length of stay averaged 4-6 months. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 948 • The Program and Fiscal Review process has identified deficiencies in programs funded by MHSA, such as effective communication between contract manager and contractor, quality assurance and sufficient staffing for the program. How we are going to remedy this should be addressed in the Three Year Plan. Response. Page 71 of the Three Year Plan outlines the scope of inquiry in which MHSA funded staff inform service providers, their leadership, and interested stakeholders of the efficacy of programs and plan elements that are partially or fully funded by MHSA. Promising practices, opportunities for improvement, and/or areas of concern are noted for sharing or follow-up activity, as appropriate. The emphasis is to establish a culture of continuous improvement of service delivery, and quality feedback for future planning efforts. This information is shared so that appropriate entities who are charged with the responsibility and authority for the performance of these programs, such as program directors and managers, contract monitors, and quality assurance staff have useful information with which to make program and fiscal decisions. These program and fiscal reviews are not an audit or other compliance or quality assurance function. • What is used to assure that those who receive one of the 119 Shelter, Inc. scattered site housing units have received a diagnosis of severe mental illness? Also, what mechanism is used to assure that the 50 permanent supportive housing units go only to the seriously mentally ill when becomes available Response. The process for referral and placement is the same for both resources. Only those diagnosed as a person with a serious mental illness and active with treatment in the CCBHS mental health system of care is placed in an available unit. The triennial program and fiscal review confirmed the process by which only individuals deemed seriously mentally ill and receiving services from CCBHS are referred by mental health case managers and placed in the housing units. • We now have had an MHSA plan in place for at least eight years, yet we have the same conditions getting even worse for those with a serious mental illness. The number of psychiatric emergency service visits is rising well above the growth rate of our county. Though intake times have improved, treatment time and the ability to see a psychiatrist has not improved. Response. The Mental Health Services Act was enacted in 2005 as a recognition that the public mental health system was severely underfunded. The requirement for counties to develop three year program and expenditure plans with stakeholder participation was to ensure that local prioritized needs were addressed with the available MHSA funding. This supplemental funding is an assist toward meeting the needs of the seriously mentally ill. The responsibility of meeting the full public mental health needs of this county is beyond the scope of this MHSA Program and Expenditure Plan. To illustrate this point the shortage of psychiatry time was documented in the needs assessment conducted prior to the development of this Three Year Plan (page 10). A locally administered student loan forgiveness program has been introduced in the Three Year Plan, and is specifically designed to assist the County in being more June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 949 competitive in recruiting and retaining psychiatrists (page 65). It is recognized that this addition of MHSA funding will not fully solve the shortage of psychiatrists. • What method is used by the County to place MHSA contracts that are more than $250,000 a year out to be re-bid every five years? Without having a request for proposal opportunity every so many years the County loses the ability to be assured that the best services are being provided by the best contractors. Response. MHSA funded contracts follow the policies and procedures established by Contra Costa County. The County does not have a policy that dictates putting contracts out to bid every five years. However, all contracts, either partially or fully funded by MHSA, undergo a triennial program and fiscal review in which the following questions are addressed; 1) is the program delivering services according to the values of the MHSA; 2) serving those who need the service; 3) providing services for which funding was allocated; 4) meeting the needs of the community and/or population; 5) serving the number of individuals that have been agreed upon; 6) achieving the outcomes that have been agreed upon; and, 7) assuring quality of care. This review process assists in ensuring the contracted programs remain relevant to the need, and additionally provides a means for continuous improvement. Thus, a re-bidding process occurs when the needs of those served and the County merit a re-bid process. • I joined the Commission because I want to advocate for people to get the help they need because of being a victim of gun violence. That’s how I got help for my mental illness, by talking to other people who have experienced the same thing. I’d like to see this throughout the County. There are a lot of victims out there, and they’re alone. But I’m glad; I read some stuff here (in the Three Year Plan), and I like it. So I want to say, you did listen. MENTAL HEALTH COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Mental Health Commission thanks all those present today for their participation in the review of the 2017-2020 MHSA Three Year Program and Expenditure Plan. This hearing fulfills the Commissions duties under the Mental Health Services Act requirements. The Commission directs that all comments and recommendations made at this hearing be detailed, addressed and included in the Plan submitted to the Board of Supervisors for adoption. Response. The Behavioral Health Services Administration appreciates the support provided by the Commission to collaboratively conduct a public hearing on the draft MHSA Three Year Program and Expenditure Plan, and responds as indicated above to any substantive recommendations for revisions provided during either the thirty day comment period or public hearing. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 950 WILLIAM B. WALKER, M.D. Health Services Director CYNTHIA BELON, L.C.S.W. Behavioral Health Services Director CONTRA COSTA BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 1340 Arnold Drive, Suite 200 Martinez, CA 94553-4639 Ph 925/957-5201 Fax 925/957-5156  Contra Costa Emergency Medical Services  Contra Costa Environmental Health  Contra Costa Health Plan  Contra Costa Hazardous Materials Programs   Contra Costa Behavioral Health  Contra Costa Public Health  Contra Costa Regional Medical Center  Contra Costa Health Centers June 13, 2017 Mental Health Services Oversight and Accountability Commission 1300 17th St., Suite 1000 Sacramento, CA 95811 E-mail: mhsoac@mhsoac.ca.gov Dear Mental Health Services Oversight and Accountability Commission: Enclosed you will find the Mental Health Services Act (MHSA) Three Year Program and Expenditure Plan for Fiscal Year 2017/2020, to include the proposed Innovation Projects, “Center for Recovery and Empowerment (CORE)” and “Cognitive Behavioral Social Skills Training (CBSST)”, as required. The Draft MHSA Three Year Program and Expenditure Plan for FY 2017/2020 was posted for the required 30 day public review and comment period from March 17, 2017 through April 19, 2017, with a public hearing on May 3, 2017. The MHSA Three Year Program and Expenditure Plan for FY 2017/2020 was adopted by the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors on June 13, 2017. Please note that we will be seeking Mental Health Services Oversight and Accountability Commission (MHSOAC) approval for the aforementioned new Innovation projects during the upcoming fiscal year. The descriptions contained herein are meant to inform our stakeholders in regards to our intentions for FY 2017/2020, and only include the budget for the first several months of project implementation (estimated start January 2018). These descriptions are not intended to seek and receive approval from the MHSOAC. Detailed project descriptions and multi-year budgets will be submitted to the MHSOAC in a separate document, and will constitute Contra Costa County’s official request for approval. As required, we have enclosed one hard copy with original signature, and one electronic copy that is a single document in PDF format, for submission. If you have any questions on this request, please contact: Cynthia Belon, LCSW, Behavioral Health Services Director, 925-957-5201, or Cynthia.Belon@hsd.cccounty.us. Thank you. Sincerely, Federal D. Glover, District V Chair of the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Enclosure: Contra Costa County Adopted MHSA Three Year Program and Expenditure Plan for FY 2017/2020 + June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 951 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 952 RECOMMENDATION(S): CONTINUE the emergency action taken by the Board of Supervisors originally on March 7, 2017, pursuant to Public Contract Code Sections 22035 and 22050, for the Morgan Territory Road Slide Repair Project, Clayton area. Project No. 0672-6U6203 (District III); and 1. RECEIVE report from Public Works Director of actions taken to procure necessary equipment, services, and supplies for the above emergency repair project. 2. FISCAL IMPACT: The total cost of the project is not expected to exceed $7,000,000. The project will be funded by Local Road Funds (100%). County staff is actively pursuing reimbursement through the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) as a result of the State and Federal emergency declarations. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Kevin Emigh, 925.313.2233 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Kevin Emigh, Public Works C. 1 To:Board of Supervisors From:Julia R. Bueren, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:CONTINUE the emergency action for the Morgan Territory Road Slide Repair project, Clayton area. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 953 BACKGROUND: On March 7, 2017, the Board of Supervisors declared an emergency and authorized the Public Works Director to proceed in the most expeditious manner to repair the washed out portion of Morgan Territory Road approximately one mile south of Marsh Creek Road. Repair Status: On April 13, 2017, the road was reopened to a one-lane condition over the slide under traffic signal control. The repair work requires the installation of two structural retaining wall systems, excavation and backfill of embankment between the wall systems, reconstruction of pavement, drainage improvements, and pavement striping. A temporary road will also need to be constructed to allow residents to access Marsh Creek Road, as Morgan Territory Road will be closed at the slide repair site during construction. This temporary road will be constructed between the top of Leon Drive, across two open parcels, and tie into the Marsh Creek Detention facility access road and then Marsh Creek Road. Public Works Department staff completed the temporary access road design and requested prices for the necessary equipment, services, and supplies to perform the work as expeditiously as possible. The resulting price quotes were received on May 11, 2017. On May 11, 2017, the Public Works Director signed a construction contract with Granite Rock Company, the firm that provided the lowest pricing for the necessary equipment, services, and supplies to construct the temporary access road, in the amount of $99,800. The County has entered into agreements with local property owners for the construction of the temporary access road. It is expected the emergency construction of the access road will begin by early-June 2017 and will be complete by mid-June 2017. Public Works Department staff completed the road repair design and requested prices for the necessary equipment, services, and supplies to perform the emergency repair project as expeditiously as possible. The resulting price quotes were received on May 23, 2017. On June 1, 2017, the Public Works Director signed a construction contract with Flatiron West, Inc., the firm that provided the lowest pricing for the necessary equipment, services, and supplies to perform the emergency repair project, in the amount of $2,846,889.00. On June 6, 2017, the board approved and authorized the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute utility relocation agreement with Contra Costa Water District, and Pacific Gas and Electric in connection with the repairs. The project will include execution of a Project Labor Agreement among Flatiron West, Inc., the Contra Costa Building and Construction Trades Council, and the County. It is expected the emergency repairs will begin by early-July 2017 and will be completed by November 2017. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Non-concurrence at this point in the project could cause delays in completion of the slide repairs. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 954 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent, or designee, on behalf of the Public Works Director, to execute a a purchase order with Hermann Equipment Inc., in an amount not to exceed $315,000, for the purchase of an Etnyre Self-Propelled Chip Spreader for Public Works road maintenance, Countywide. FISCAL IMPACT: 100% Local Road Funds. BACKGROUND: To be used for chip seal operations throughout the County. This purchase is to replace an existing vehicle in the road maintenance fleet that has been removed from service and will be disposed of because it is beyond economical repair. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Negative action would result in the inability to effectively provide routine maintenance to perform chip seal operations on County roads. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Mike Giles, 925-313-7041 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 2 To:Board of Supervisors From:Julia R. Bueren, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent to Execute a Purchase Order with Hermann Equipment, Inc. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 955 RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2017/204 accepting completion of improvements for subdivision SD15-09302, for a project developed by Shapell Homes, a Division of Shapell Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, as recommended by the Public Works Director, San Ramon (Dougherty Valley) area. (District II) FISCAL IMPACT: 100% Developers Fees BACKGROUND: The developer has completed the improvements per the Subdivision Agreement, and in accordance with the Title 9 of the County Ordinance Code. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The completion of improvements will not be accepted. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jocelyn LaRocque, 925-313-2315 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Renee Hutchins, Records, Sherri Reed, Design and Construction, Chris Halford, Mapping, Lori Leontini, Engineering Services, Chris Low, City of San Ramon, Shapell Homes, A Division of Shapell Industries, Inc. A Delaware Corporation, Western Surety Company C. 3 To:Board of Supervisors From:Julia R. Bueren, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:Accepting completion of improvements for subdivision SD15-09302, San Ramon (Dougherty Valley) area. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 956 AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2017/204 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed: Resolution No. 2017/204 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 957 Recorded at the request of:Jocelyn LaRocque, 925-313-2315 Return To:Naila Thrower, 925-313-2170 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 06/13/2017 by the following vote: AYE:John Gioia, District I SupervisorCandace Andersen, District II SupervisorDiane Burgis, District III SupervisorKaren Mitchoff, District IV SupervisorFederal D. Glover, District V Supervisor NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2017/204 IN THE MATTER OF accepting completion of improvements for subdivision SD15-09302, for a project developed by Shapell Homes, a Division of Shapell Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, as recommended by the Public Works Director, San Ramon (Dougherty Valley) area. (District II) WHEREAS the Public Works Director has notified this Board that the improvements in subdivision SD15-09302, have been completed as provided in the Subdivision Agreement with Shapell Homes, a Division of Shapell Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, heretofore approved by this Board in conjunction with the filing of the Subdivision Map. WHEREAS these improvements are approximately located near Dougherty Road. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the improvements have been COMPLETED as of June 13, 2017, thereby establishing the six-month terminal period for the filing of liens in case of action under said Subdivision Agreement: DATE OF AGREEMENT: July 7, 2015 NAME OF SURETY: Western Surety Company BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the payment (labor and materials) surety for $402,000, Bond No. 58724613 issued by the above surety be RETAINED for the six-month lien guarantee period until December 13, 2017, at which time the Board AUTHORIZES the release of said surety less the amount of any claims on file. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that upon acceptance by the Board of Supervisors, the San Ramon City Council shall accept the improvements for maintenance and ownership in accordance with the Dougherty Valley Memorandum of Understanding. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that there is no warranty period required, and the Public Works Director is AUTHORIZED to refund the $9,000 cash security for performance (Auditor's Deposit Permit No. 687005, dated June 11, 2015) plus interest in accordance with Government Code Section 53709, if appropriate, to Shapell Homes, a Division of Shapell Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, pursuant to the requirements of the Ordinance Code; and the Subdivision Agreement and surety bond, Bond No. 58724613, dated April 29, 2015, are EXONERATED. Contact: Jocelyn LaRocque, 925-313-2315 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 958 Contact: Jocelyn LaRocque, 925-313-2315 ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Renee Hutchins, Records, Sherri Reed, Design and Construction, Chris Halford, Mapping, Lori Leontini, Engineering Services, Chris Low, City of San Ramon, Shapell Homes, A Division of Shapell Industries, Inc. A Delaware Corporation, Western Surety Company June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 959 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 960 RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2017/206 approving the third extension of the Subdivision Agreement for subdivision SD91-07553, for a project being developed by Alamo Land Investors, LLC and Alamo 37, LLC, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Alamo area. (District II) FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: The terminal date of the Subdivision Agreement needs to be extended. The developer has not completed the required improvements and has requested more time. (Approximately 0% of the work has been completed to date.) By granting an extension, the County will give the developer more time to complete improvements and keeps the bond current. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The terminal date of the Subdivision Agreement will not be extended and the developer will be in default of the agreement, requiring the County to take legal action against the developer and surety to get the improvements installed, or revert the development to acreage. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jocelyn LaRocque, 925-313-2315 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Jocelyn LaRocque, Engineering Services, Sherri Reed, Design and Construction, Ruben Hernandez, Dept. of Conservation, Alamo Land Investors, LLC and Alamo 37, Safeco Insurance Company of America, T- November 20, 2017 C. 4 To:Board of Supervisors From:Julia R. Bueren, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:Approving the third extension of the Subdivision Agreement for subdivision SD91-07553, Alamo area. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 961 AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2017/206 Subdivision Agreement Extension SD91-07553 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed: Resolution No. 2017/206 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 962 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 06/13/2017 by the following vote: AYE: John Gioia Candace Andersen Diane Burgis Karen Mitchoff Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2017/206 IN THE MATTER OF approving the third extension of the Subdivision Agreement for subdivision SD91-07553, for a project being developed by Alamo Land Investors, LLC and Alamo 37, LLC, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Alamo area. (District II) WHEREAS the Public Works Director having recommended that she be authorized to execute the third agreement extension which extends the subdivision agreement between Alamo Land Investors, LLC and Alamo 37, LLC and the County for construction of certain improvements in SD91-07553, Alamo area, through January 12, 2018. APPROXIMATE PERCENTAGE OF WORK COMPLETE: 0% ANTICIPATED DATE OF COMPLETION: 2020 BOND NO.: 6653214 Date: December 16, 2009 REASON FOR EXTENSION: Low market demand for custom homes NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the recommendation of the Public Works Director is APPROVED. Contact: Jocelyn LaRocque, 925-313-2315 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Jocelyn LaRocque, Engineering Services, Sherri Reed, Design and Construction, Ruben Hernandez, Dept. of Conservation, Alamo Land Investors, LLC and Alamo 37, Safeco Insurance Company of America, T- November 20, 2017 5 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 963 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 964 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 965 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 966 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 967 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 968 RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2017/207 approving the ninth extension of the Drainage Improvement Agreement for drainage acceptance DA04-00035 (cross-reference SD99-08381), for a project being developed by Shapell Homes, a Division of Shapell Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Danville area. (District III) FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: The terminal date of the Drainage Improvement Agreement needs to be extended. The developer has not completed the required improvements and has requested more time. (Approximately 50% of the work has been completed to date.) By granting an extension, the County will give the developer more time to complete improvements and keeps the bond current. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The terminal date of the Drainage Improvement Agreement will not be extended and the developer will be in default of the agreement, requiring the County to take legal action against the developer and surety to get the improvements installed, or revert the development to acreage. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jocelyn LaRocque, 925-313-2315 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Jocelyn LaRocque, Engineering Services, Sherri Reed, Design and Construction, Ruben Hernandez, Dept. of Conservation, T- November 9, 2017, Shapell Homes, A Division of Shapell Industries, Inc. A Delaware Corporation, The Continental Insurance Company c/o Daniel Dunigan - Vice President - Surety C. 5 To:Board of Supervisors From:Julia R. Bueren, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:Approving the ninth extension of the Drainage Improvement Agreement for drainage acceptance DA04-00035, Danville area. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 969 AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2017/207 Drainage Improvement Agreement Extension DA04-00035 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed: Resolution No. 2017/207 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 970 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 06/13/2017 by the following vote: AYE: John Gioia Candace Andersen Diane Burgis Karen Mitchoff Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2017/207 IN THE MATTER OF approving the ninth extension of the Drainage Improvement Agreement for drainage acceptance DA04-00035 (cross-reference SD99-08381), for a project being developed by Shapell Homes, a Division of Shapell Industries., a Delaware Corporation, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Danville area. (District III) WHEREAS the Public Works Director having recommended that she be authorized to execute the ninth agreement extension which extends the Drainage Improvement Agreement between Shapell Homes, a Division of Shapell Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation and the County for construction of certain improvements in drainage acceptance DA04-00035 (cross-reference SD99-08381), Danville area, through January 9, 2018. APPROXIMATE PERCENTAGE OF WORK COMPLETE: 50% ANTICIPATED DATE OF COMPLETION: September 2022 BOND NO.: 929412116 Date: October 25, 2006 REASON FOR EXTENSION: Sediment basin to be converted to bio-retention basin when house construction is completed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the recommendation of the Public Works Director is APPROVED. Contact: Jocelyn LaRocque, 925-313-2315 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Jocelyn LaRocque, Engineering Services, Sherri Reed, Design and Construction, Ruben Hernandez, Dept. of Conservation, T- November 9, 2017, Shapell Homes, A Division of Shapell Industries, Inc. A Delaware Corporation, The Continental Insurance Company c/o Daniel Dunigan - Vice President - Surety 5 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 971 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 972 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 973 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 974 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 975 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 976 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 977 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 978 RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2017/211 approving the Stormwater Management Facilities Operation and Maintenance Agreement for minor subdivision MS14-0013, for a project being developed by Pacific Union Property Developers, LLC, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Alamo area. (District II) FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: The Stormwater Management Facilities Operation and Maintenance Agreement is required by Condition of Approval No. 52. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The agreement will not be recorded and Contra Costa County may not be in full compliance with its National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit and Stormwater Management Discharge Control Ordinance. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jocelyn LaRocque, 925-313-2315 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Pacific Union Property Developers, Internal Fidelity Insurance Co. C. 6 To:Board of Supervisors From:Julia R. Bueren, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:APPROVE the Stormwater Management Facilities Operation and Maintenance Agreement for minor subdivision MS14-0013, Alamo area. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 979 AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2017/211 O&M Agreement MS14-0013 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed: Resolution No. 2017/211 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 980 Recorded at the request of:Jocelyn LaRocque, 925-313-2315 Return To:Naila Thrower, 925-313-2170 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 06/13/2017 by the following vote: AYE:John Gioia, District I SupervisorCandace Andersen, District II SupervisorDiane Burgis, District III SupervisorKaren Mitchoff, District IV SupervisorFederal D. Glover, District V Supervisor NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2017/211 IN THE MATTER OF approving the Stormwater Management Facilities Operation and Maintenance Agreement for minor subdivision MS14-0013 (APN 188-232-041), Alamo area. (District II) WHEREAS the Public Works Director has recommended that she be authorized to execute the Stormwater Management Facilities Operations and Maintenance Agreement with Pacific Union Property Developers, LLC, as required by the Conditions of Approval for minor subdivision MS14-0013. This agreement would ensure the operation and maintenance of the stormwater facilities in accordance with the approved Stormwater Control Plan and approved Operation and Maintenance Plan for minor subdivision MS14-0013, which is located at 66 Crest Avenue in the Alamo area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the recommendation of the Public Works Director is APPROVED. Contact: Jocelyn LaRocque, 925-313-2315 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Pacific Union Property Developers, Internal Fidelity Insurance Co. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 981 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 982 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 983 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 984 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 985 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 986 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 987 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 988 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 989 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 990 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 991 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 992 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 993 RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2017/212 approving the Parcel Map and Subdivision Agreement for minor subdivision MS14-0013, for a project developed by Pacific Union Property Developers, LLC, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Alamo area. (District II) FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: The Public Works Department has reviewed the conditions of approval for minor subdivision MS14-0013 and has determined that all conditions of approval for Parcel Map approval have been satisfied. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The Parcel Map and the Subdivision Agreement will not be approved and recorded. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jocelyn LaRocque, 925-313-2315 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Sherri Reed, Design and Construction, T- April 13, 2018, Pacific Union Property Developers, LLC, Internal Fidelity Insurance Co. C. 7 To:Board of Supervisors From:Julia R. Bueren, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:APPROVE the Parcel Map and Subdivision Agreement for minor subdivision MS14-0013, Alamo area. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 994 AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2017/212 Subdivision Agreement MS14-0013 Improvement Security Bond MS14-0013 Parcel Map MS14-0013 Tax Letter MS14-0013 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed: Resolution No. 2017/212 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 995 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 06/13/2017 by the following vote: AYE: John Gioia Candace Andersen Diane Burgis Karen Mitchoff Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2017/212 IN THE MATTER OF approving the Parcel Map and Subdivision Agreement for minor subdivision MS14-0013, for a project being developed by Pacific Union Property Developers, LLC, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Alamo area. (District II) WHEREAS the following documents were presented for Board approval this date: I. Map The Parcel Map of minor subdivision MS14-0013, property located in the Alamo area, Supervisoral District II, said map having been certified by the proper officials. II. Subdivision Agreement A subdivision agreement with Pacific Union Property Developers, LLC, whereby said principal agrees to complete all improvements as required in said subdivision agreement within two (2) year(s) from the date of said agreement. Accompanying said subdivision agreement is security guaranteeing completion of said improvements as follows: A. Cash Bond Performance Amount: $3,540 Auditor's Deposit Permit No.: DP737369 Date: 5/24/2017 Submitted by: Pacific Union Property Developers, LLC B. Surety Bond Bond Company: International Fidelity Insurance Company Bond No.: 0715442 Date: 3/9/2017 Performance Amount: $350,460 Labor & Materials Amount: $177,000 Principal: Pacific Union Property Developers, LLC III. Tax Letter Letter from the County Tax Collector stating that there are no unpaid County taxes heretofore levied on the property included in said map and that the 2016-2017 tax lien has been paid in full and the 2017-2018 tax lien, which became a lien on the first day of January 2017, is estimated to be $26,590, with security guaranteeing payment of said tax lien as follows: Tax Surety Bond Company: International Fidelity Insurance Company 5 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 996 Auditor's Deposit Permit No.: DP737015 Date: 5/18/2017 Amount: $26,590 Submitted by: Pacific Union Property Developers, LLC NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That said subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is DETERMINED to be consistent with the County's general and specific plans. 2. That said map is APPROVED and this Board does hereby accept subject to installation and acceptance of improvements on behalf of the public any of the streets, paths, or easements shown thereon as dedicated to public use. 3. That said subdivision agreement is also APPROVED. Contact: Jocelyn LaRocque, 925-313-2315 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Sherri Reed, Design and Construction, T- April 13, 2018, Pacific Union Property Developers, LLC, Internal Fidelity Insurance Co. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 997 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 998 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 999 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1000 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1001 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1002 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1003 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1004 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1005 June 13, 2017Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors1006 June 13, 2017Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors1007 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1008 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1009 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1010 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE the attached Workplan or Framework for developing the Contra Costa County Green Infrastructure Plan (GI Plan). FISCAL IMPACT: The County has included $150,000 in its Fiscal Year 2017–2018 budget for the GI Plan. The Public Works Department proposes an additional $200,000 budget for this purpose in Fiscal Year 2018–2019, for a total GI Plan budget of $350,000. (100% Stormwater Utility Assessment 17 Funds) BACKGROUND: A new section of the Municipal Regional Stormwater National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit (MRP) requires Permittees to develop and implement long-term GI Plans for the inclusion of Low Impact Development (LID) measures to retrofit storm drain infrastructure on public and private lands, including streets, roads, storm drains, parking lots, building roofs, and other elements. The GI Plan uses vegetation, soils, and natural processes to filter and retain stormwater and create healthier urban environments. The MRP Provision C.3.j.i(1) requests Permittees to adopt a GI Plan by June 30, 2017, and to submit it to the Regional Water Quality Control Board by September 30, 2017. The Transportation, Water and Infrastructure Committee reviewed the GI Plan APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: John Steere, (925) 313-2281 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Cece Sellgren, Flood Control, John Steere, Flood Control, Catherine Windham, Flood Control C. 8 To:Board of Supervisors From:Julia R. Bueren, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:Contra Costa County Green Infrastructure Workplan, Countywide. Project No. 7517-6W7260 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1011 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) concept and estimated budget on October 13, 2016, and again on April 10, 2017. A GI Plan Technical Advisory Group was convened in February 2017, composed of representatives from relevant divisions of the Public Works Department and the Department of Conservation and Development, to shape the Framework and guide the planning process. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If the Board of Supervisors does not approve the GI Plan Framework, the County will not be in compliance with requirements of MRP Provision C.3.j.i.(1) that calls for each Permittee to define a GI Plan. ATTACHMENTS GI Workplan June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1012 Contra Costa County Green Infrastructure Workplan Approved on: June 13, 2017 Approved by: Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Submitted by: John Steere/Contra Costa County Green Infrastructure Plan Technical Advisory Group June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1013 ii Contra Costa County developed this document from two templates, one prepared by Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program and the other from the Contra Costa Clean Water Program, to assist jurisdictions in complying with requirements in Provision C.3.j.i.(1) of the Municipal Regional Stormwater NPDES Permit (MRP) to develop a Workplan for preparing a Green Infrastructure Plan. The template was intended to provide jurisdictions with a format and suggested content for their Green Infrastructure Plan Framework. The Workplan must be approved by June 30, 2017 and submitted to the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board by September 30, 2017. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1014 iii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................ 5 1.1 What is Green Infrastructure? ............................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Stormwater Quality Regulatory Requirements .................................................................................. 5 1.3 Purpose of Green Infrastructure Plan and Framework .................................................................... 7 1.4 Contra Costa County Goals, Preliminary Planning, and Overall Approach .............................. 8 2.0 GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN ELEMENTS & APPROACH ................................................................... 10 2.1 Interdeparment Coordination and Community Outreach .......................................................... 10 2.1.1 Interdepartmental Coordination…………………………………………………………………. 11 2.1.2. Community Engagement and Outreach ................................................................................ 10 2.2 Green Infrastructure Project Identification and Prioritization ....................................................... 11 2.2.1 Review of Capital Improvement Program Projects ................................................................ 12 2.2.2 County Tools and Processes for GI Project Identification and Prioritization ....................... 12 2.2.3 Use of Contra Costa Watersheds Stormwater Resource Plan Tools and Project Lists ...... 13 2.2.4 Alternative Compliance…………………………………………………………………...............14 2. 3 Evaluating Pollutant Load Reductions ............................................................................................. 13 2.4 Projecting Green Infrastructure Implementation............................................................................ 14 2.5 Completed Project Tracking System ................................................................................................. 14 2.6 Design Guidance and Specifications for GI Projects .................................................................... 15 2.7 Sizing Requirements for Green Infrastructure Projects ................................................................... 15 3.0 Integration with Existing Plans ................................................................................................................. 16 3.2 Adoption of Policies, Ordinances, and Other Legal Mechanisms to Support Green Infrastructure ................................................................................................................................................ 17 4.0 Evaluation of Funding Options ............................................................................................................... 19 5.0 Task List, Timeframes, and Budget ......................................................................................................... 20 5.1 Tasks and Timeframes........................................................................................................................... 20 5.2 Budget ..................................................................................................................................................... 20 LIST APPENDICES APPENDIX A. “Guidance for Identifying Green Infrastructure Potential in Municipal Capital Improvement Projects” (May 6, 2016). BASMAA APPENDIX B. Contra Costa County Watersheds Stormwater Resources Plan Scope of Work and Schedule APPENDIX C. GI Plan process and budget analysis (TWIC, Updated April 10, 2017) June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1015 iv ACRONYMS AB AG Association of Bay Area Governments BASMAA Bay Area Stormwater Management Agencies Association Caltrans California Department of Transportation CCCWP Contra Costa Clean Water Program CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CIP Capital Improvement Program DCD Department of Conservation and Development (Contra Costa County) DWR CA Department of Water Resources EPA Environmental Protection Agency FY Fiscal Year GI Green Infrastructure GI TAG Green Infrastructure Technical Advisory Group GIS Geographic Information System Hg Mercury LID Low Impact Development LUS Watershed Management Initiative Land Use Subgroup MC Management Committee MEP Maximum Extent Practicable MRP Municipal Regional Stormwater NPDES Permit MS4 Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System NGO Non-Governmental Organization NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination O&M Operation and Maintenance PCBs Polychlorinated Biphenyls PIP Public Information and Participation POC Pollutant of Concern RFP Request for Proposal ROW Right of Way RWQCB San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board SFEI San Francisco Estuary Institute SFEP San Francisco Estuary Partnership SRP Stormwater Resources Plan State Board State Water Resource Control Board SWRP Storm Water Resource Plan SWRCB State Water Resource Control Board TMDL Total Maximum Daily Load TWIC Transportation, Water and Infrastructure Committee (of the Board of Supervisors) Water Board San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board WDR Waste Discharge Requirements June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1016 Page | 5 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 What is Green Infrastructure? “Green Infrastructure” (GI) is infrastructure that uses vegetation, soils, and natural processes to manage stormwater and create healthier urban environments. At the scale of a city or county, GI refers to the patchwork of natural areas that provides habitat, flood protection, cleaner air, and cleaner water. At the scale of a neighborhood or project site, GI refers to stormwater management systems and features that mimic wetland processes by absorbing, filtering, and storing water. GI offers resilient, sustainable landscape features, such as bioswales, that slow, filter, harvest, infiltrate and/or evaporate precipitation runoff through engineered soil and plants (from grasses to trees). GI can also include pervious paving systems (e.g., interlocking concrete pavers, porous asphalt, and pervious concrete), rainwater harvesting systems (e.g., cisterns and rain barrels), and other methods to capture and treat stormwater. These practices are also known as Low Impact Development (LID) site design and treatment measures. GI is a “multi-benefit” stormwater treatment solution. That is, it provides amenities with many benefits beyond water quality improvement and groundwater replenishment, including creation of attractive streetscapes, reduction of heat island effect, bicycle and pedestrian accessibility, clean air, climate change resilience and mitigation, place-making and community cohesion, energy savings, higher property values, and enhanced flood protection. 1.2 Stormwater Quality Regulatory Requirements Contra Costa County (County) is subject to the requirements of the recently reissued Municipal Regional Stormwater National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit for Phase I municipalities and agencies in the San Francisco Bay Area (Order R2- 2015-0049), also known as the Municipal Regional Permit (MRP), which became effective on January 1, 2016. The MRP applies to 76 large, medium and small municipalities (including 71 cities and towns and 5 counties) and flood control agencies that discharge stormwater to San Francisco Bay, collectively referred to as Permittees. Over the last 13 years, under the MRP and previous stormwater permits, new development and redevelopment projects on private and public property that exceeded certain size thresholds (“Regulated Projects”) were required to mitigate impacts on water quality by incorporating site design, pollutant source control, stormwater treatment and flow control measures as appropriate. LID treatment June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1017 Page | 6 measures, such as rainwater harvesting and use, infiltration, and bio-treatment, have been required on most regulated projects since December 2011. Construction of new roads is also covered by these requirements, but projects related to existing roads and adjoining sidewalks and bike lanes are not regulated unless they include creation of an additional travel lane. A new section of the MRP requires Permittees to develop and implement long-term GI Plans for the inclusion of LID measures in storm drain infrastructure on public and private lands, including streets, roads, storm drains, parking lots, building roofs, and other elements. The GI Plan must be completed by September 30, 2019. As part of the GI planning process, the MRP calls upon Permittees to adopt a GI Workplan by June 30, 2017, and submit it to the Regional Water Quality Control Board (Water Board) by September 30, 2017. The Workplan, a framework for completing the GI Plan, must at a minimum include a statement of purpose, and tasks and timeframes to complete the required elements of the GI Plan. Provisions C.11 and C.12 in the MRP require Contra Costa Permittees (Contra Costa County and its 19 cities and towns) to reduce estimated PCB loading by 23 grams/year and estimated mercury loading by 9 grams/year using GI by June 30, 2020. Regionally, Permittees must also project the load reductions achieved via GI by 2020, 2030, and 2040, showing that collectively, reductions will amount to 3 kg/year PCBs and 10 kg/year mercury by 2040. The GI Plan will provide estimates of the reductions in the quantity of these pollutants based on implementation of the elements outlined in the Plan. A key component of the GI definition in the MRP is the inclusion of both private and public property locations for GI systems. This has been done in order to plan, analyze, implement and credit GI systems for pollutant load reductions on a watershed scale, as well as recognize all GI accomplishments within a municipality. However, the focus of the GI Plan and Workplan is the integration of GI systems into public rights-of-way. The GI Plan is not intended to impose retrofit requirements on private property, outside of the standard development application review process for projects already regulated by the MRP, but may provide incentives or opportunities for private property owners to add or contribute towards GI elements if desired. The County’s Watershed Program has developed this document in collaboration with a multi-departmental Technical Advisory Group convened for this purpose. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1018 Page | 7 1.3 Purpose of Green Infrastructure Plan and Framework The purpose of the GI Plan is to provide a blueprint as to how the County will gradually transform its urban landscape and storm drainage systems from exclusively “gray” to a mix of gray and “green” infrastructure. The County’s GI Plan will guide a shift from gray, conventional “collect and convey” storm drain infrastructure to more resilient, sustainable stormwater management that reduces runoff volumes, disperses runoff to vegetated areas, harvests and uses runoff where feasible, promotes infiltration and evapotranspiration, and uses natural processes to detain and treat runoff. As required by Provisions C.3.a. through C.3.i. in the MRP, “Low Impact Development” practices are currently implemented on land development projects throughout the County. Specific methods and design criteria are spelled out in the Contra Costa Clean Water Program’s (CCCWP) Stormwater C.3 Guidebook, which the County has referenced in its Stormwater Management and Discharge Control Ordinance (Ordinance No. 2005-01, Title 10.14). The proposed Plan will detail how similar methods will be incorporated into County project development processes to retrofit existing infrastructure, including streets, roads, and storm drains, using stormwater treatment facilities constructed on public and private parcels and within the public right-of-way. To prepare the Plan, the County will:  Review planned capital projects to identify the potential to incorporate Low Impact Development drainage design.  Identify and prioritize areas and projects within the County to implement additional GI projects.  Coordinate within and between the County’s departments to develop concepts for integrated projects that serve multiple objectives (e.g., multi-modal transportation, recreation, streetscape improvements, and parks, as well as GI).  Document resources and a process for completing conceptual designs.  Document a funding strategy for future projects, including a process to pursue funding and align project funding sources and schedules to successfully build integrated projects.  Develop and implement a system to track GI projects, including land development projects subject to Provision C.3.a. through C.3.i. requirements, and project future implementation.  Evaluate and predict the resulting reductions in the quantity of pollutants— including PCBs, mercury, and trash—transported to creeks and the Bay/Delta. As part of the GI Plan, the County will develop monitoring tools to be used to demonstrate the County’s long-term progress in reducing loads of pollutants of June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1019 Page | 8 concern, particularly mercury and PCBs, discharged in stormwater to local waterways through the implementation of GI . The GI Plan will be coordinated with other County plans, as described below and as shown in Table 1. The purposes of this Workplan are to: 1. Provide background on the MRP requirements for GI Planning; 2. Describe the purpose, goals, and tasks to develop the GI Plan; and, 3. Outline the time frames for the creation of the GI Plan and other GI tasks required in the MRP. 1.4 Contra Costa County Goals, Preliminary Planning, and Overall Approach The GI Plan will provide a strategic blueprint on how to incorporate GI in both private and public projects, especially in relation to the County’s road network. Two existing initiatives will give substantial guidance and an evaluative framework for the GI Plan. These two supportive initiatives are the Contra Costa Watersheds Stormwater Resources Plan and the “Green Plan Bay Area — Green Plan-IT.” The Stormwater Resources Plan will be managed by the CCCWP and is anticipated to be underway by the summer of 2017; it will provide comprehensive watershed and water quality goals/objectives and a preliminary analytic framework for the GI Plan, thus reducing the level of effort required to prepare it. “Green Plan Bay Area — Green Plan-IT,” is a versatile GIS toolset being developed by the San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI) that aids municipalities with their efforts to place GI in the landscape and track the effectiveness of these installations. The County’s Watershed Program and IT Division of the Public Works Department (PWD) has been actively engaged with SFEI staff in developing and applying this innovative evaluative toolset to several unincorporated communities in the County, most notably for North Richmond. GIS layers for most fields/topics to be addressed in a GI Plan have been furnished to SFEI to enable this toolset to be used to identify, rank, and map potential GI locations within the County’s Watersheds, as well as provide a hydrologic and water quality modeling tool. These will also be helpful in identifying and prioritizing potential GI project locations and bioretention basin sizing. The CCCWP is also developing a GIS layer to facilitate tracking GI projects. The County will take a collaborative approach to achieve GI goals in public projects through coordination internally across County departments and externally with regional partners. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1020 Page | 9 Internal collaboration: Development and implementation of the GI Plan is an interdepartmental effort led by the County’s Watershed Program and involving the PWD and constituent divisions, including Engineering Services, Transportation Engineering, Capital Projects, and Design/Construction, along with the Department of Conservation and Development (DCD), (current, advance, and sustainability). To ensure a realistic Workplan and encourage collaboration across departments, the Watershed Program has convened and coordinated a monthly GI Technical Advisory Group (TAG). The County also plans to work across departments to incorporate GI into multi-objective projects and plans within the County, among them the County General Plan Update (2020) and the Countywide Bike and Pedestrian Plan update (2017), in order to achieve multiple benefits, among them clean water and air, climate change resilience and mitigation, enhanced habitat values, and energy savings. Because of the diversified characteristics of the County related to its land uses, soil permeability (varying from clay to sand), topography, existing roadway configurations, and right-of-way widths, which constrain opportunities for GI, the County will need to be strategic in development of the GI Plan. The County plans to utilize watershed-scale partnerships and collaborative multi-benefit efforts to implement regional projects in coordination with neighboring cities and special districts, service districts, and transportation agencies. A major component of the process to implement regional projects will be clearly defining roles and responsibilities of the stakeholders involved. Through collaboration among its departments and programs and with its regional and nonprofit partners, the County will meet GI requirements and load reduction milestones. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1021 Page | 10 2.0 GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN ELEMENTS & APPROACH 2.1 Interdepartmental Coordination and Community Outreach To be successful, the GI Plan must engage a wide variety of stakeholders in plan, policy, and project concept development. Planned projects with multiple benefits may be proposed for streets, parks, schools or other public parcels. A successful GI planning team will include representatives from the municipal departments who plan and implement projects on these streets and parcels. A necessary part of a successful planning approach is a robust and inclusive input and engagement of municipal staff and the community members who live, work, and play near proposed GI projects. 2.1.1 Interdepartmental Coordination The County has developed a strategy to engage and educate its staff on the purposes and goals of GI , the required elements of the GI Plan, and the steps needed to develop and implement the GI Plan. The County has also convened an interdepartmental committee, or Technical Advisory Group (TAG), coordinated by the County Watershed Program, to help define and implement the framework for the GI Plan. The County’s GI Plan TAG consists of the departments and staff representatives shown in Table 1, (see following page). The TAG has met four times in FY 16-17 to discuss the required elements and development of the County’s GI Plan. (See also Section 1.4 for a more detailed discussion of the GI Plan TAG). 2.1.2. Community Engagement and Outreach The County will develop a comprehensive community engagement and education strategy in order to educate public stakeholders on GI benefits and requirements and to engage them in the development of the County’s GI Plan. Such outreach will include general outreach and targeted outreach and training for professionals involved in infrastructure planning and design. This effort is ongoing and will be coordinated countywide with the CCCWP. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1022 Page | 11 2.2 Green Infrastructure Project Identification and Prioritization The GI Plan must describe the mechanism by which the County will identify, prioritize and map potential and planned projects that incorporate GI components in different drainage areas within the County. These include public and private projects that may be implemented over the long-term, with milestones for implementation by 2020, 2030, and 2040. The mechanism must include the criteria for prioritization and outputs that can be incorporated into the County’s long-term planning and capital improvement processes. The GI Plan must contain the outputs resulting from the identification and prioritization mechanism described above, such as lists and maps of prioritized projects and timeframes for implementation. The outputs must also include “targets” or estimates of how much impervious surface within the County will be converted or “retrofit” to drain Table 1. Interdepartmental Green Infrastructure Plan Technical Advisor y Group Staff Department/Division and Role Mitch Avalon County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (FCD); Strategic Planning relative to flood control and stormwater Mary Halle PWD —Transportation Engineering; Senior Transportation Engineer, Capital Road Projects Will Wahbeh Capital Projects; Senior Project Mgr. Capital Projects and GI Slava Gospodchikov PWD — Design/Construction Division; Senior Civil Engineer Jody London DCD — Sustainable Development and Climate Change Coordination Will Nelson DCD — Principal Planner, Advance Planning Gary Kupp DCD — Current Planning, C.3 Coordination with PWD Cece Sellgren PWD — Watershed Program; Stormwater Manager John Steere PWD — Watershed Program; TAG Convener/Coordinator June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1023 Page | 12 to a GI feature, such as a vegetated area or stormwater capture or treatment facility, by the 2020, 2030, and 2040 milestones. The County will use the following mechanisms to identify, prioritize, and map future GI projects: 2.2.1 Review of Capital Improvement Program Projects The County must prepare and maintain a list of public and private GI projects planned for implementation during the permit term and public projects that have potential for GI measures. Public projects include all facility and infrastructure projects undertaken by the County, such as projects associated with roads, drainage systems, airports, parks, buildings, and parking lots. All projects must be evaluated for GI and include GI components as appropriate. Those projects that require GI but cannot due to, for example, limited right-of-way or limited opportunity for Pollutant of Concern (POC) load reduction, can meet the requirement through Alternative Compliance (see section 2.2.4 below). The County has begun this process and an initial list was submitted with the FY 2015-16 MRP Annual Report to the Regional Board. The creation and maintenance of this list for public projects is supported by guidance developed by BASMAA: “Guidance for Identifying GI Potential in Municipal Capital Improvement Projects” (May 6, 2016). The BASMAA Guidance is attached to this document as Appendix A. The GI Plan will document current implementation of this process within the County and will identify planned changes or needed improvements. Resultant project lists will be used to provide potential projects for incorporation into the GI Plan. 2.2.2 County Tools and Processes for GI Project Identification and Prioritization County staff will develop a process and the resources for identifying and pursuing, on an ongoing basis, additional opportunities to construct GI projects in the County. This process and necessary resources to carry them out will be documented in the Plan and will address how multi-objective projects will be identified through a collaborative interdepartmental planning process. Using the “BASMAA Guidance for Identifying GI Potential…” the County Watershed Program will meet annually in the early spring with members of the TAG to review their Capital Improvement Projects (CIPs) to identify, prioritize, and map GI projects. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1024 Page | 13 2.2.3 Use of Contra Costa Watersheds Stormwater Resource Plan Tools and Project Lists The CCCWP has obtained a planning grant from the State Water Resources Control Board to develop a Stormwater Resource Plan for Contra Costa County. The Contra Costa Watersheds Stormwater Resources Plan (CCWSRP) will support the development and implementation of GI Plans within each Basin through identification of local and regional opportunities for GI projects and development of modeling tools for estimating pollutant load reductions over future timeframes. The resulting maps and tools will be available for local use by Contra Costa municipalities. The CCWSRP will also produce a list of prioritized GI projects. The CCWSRP will identify and prioritize multi-benefit GI projects throughout the County, using a metrics based approach for quantifying project benefits, such as volume of stormwater infiltrated and/or treated and quantity of pollutants removed. The metrics-based analysis will be conducted using hydrologic/hydraulic and water quality models coupled with GIS resources and other tools. Project concepts will also be assessed for additional benefits such as flood control, community greening, and habitat creation. The product of these analyses will be a map of opportunity areas for GI projects throughout the County, an initial prioritized list of potential projects, and strategies for implementation of these and future projects. The list of potential projects within Contra Costa County will be available for incorporation into the GI Plan project list. The scope of work and schedule for the CCWSRP is provided in Appendix B. 2.2.4 Alternative Compliance Provision C.3.e allows a project to meet its requirement for stormwater treatment through an alternative means. If a road project, for example, in an urbanized area has limited right-of-way for including GI , that requirement can be met by constructing a GI project elsewhere. The GI Plan will include developing GI projects to accommodate requirements for projects in other parts of the County that cannot meet their GI requirement within the limits of the project. This can include developing regional scale GI projects that can accommodate alternative compliance needs for multiple projects. The GI Plan will also include a mechanism for projects to pay an in-lieu fee towards funding alternative compliance GI projects. 2. 3 Evaluating Pollutant Load Reductions The GI project prioritization criteria will consider opportunities to reduce loads of trash, mercury, PCBs, and other pollutants. It is anticipated that mercury and PCB pollutant load reductions will be evaluated for each project using a regionally developed Interim June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1025 Page | 14 Accounting Methodology, which is based on watershed locations and historic land uses. A draft of this regionally developed methodology was submitted to the Regional Board in the 2016 MRP Annual Report and the finalized methodology was released on March 23, 2017. Furthermore, it is anticipated that a Reasonable Assurance Analysis will be developed in cooperation with both regional and Countywide partners to demonstrate that reductions will be achieved in the timeframe required by the 2006 Mercury TMDL and the 2008 PCBs TMDL. The County’s GI Plan will include a description of these two methodologies and they will be incorporated into the project prioritization criteria as much as possible. The County also anticipates that these two methodologies will be used to help develop and/or confirm targets for the amount of impervious surface, from both public and private projects, within the County, which will need to be converted or “retrofitted” to drain to GI features, such as a vegetated area or stormwater treatment facility, or converted to pervious surfaces, by the MRP’s 2020, 2030, and 2040 milestones. 2.4 Projecting Green Infrastructure Implementation To develop the Reasonable Assurance Analysis demonstrating that pollutant load reductions will be achieved in the required timeframes, the GI Plan will include an estimate of the pace of future GI Implementation on public and private parcels. To estimate the pace of future implementation, the County will participate in development of a consistent Countywide or regional methodology for projecting private development in future decades. The projections will likely incorporate or adapt regional scenarios created by the Association of Bay Area Governments/Metropolitan Transportation Commission (ABAG/MTC) to estimate future implementation of GI in each municipality. 2.5 Completed Project Tracking System The GI Plan will describe the County’s process for tracking and mapping completed public and private projects and making the information available to the public. This information will include the area treated by each GI project. Through the CCCWP, the County is participating in development of a GIS that will allow spatial tracking and representation (maps) of GI projects and associated tributary drainage areas. The database will be used for tracking and reporting public projects, Regulated Projects (MRP Provision C.3.b.) including Special Projects (MRP Provision C.3.e.) and tracking operation and maintenance verification inspections of installed stormwater treatment facilities (MRP Provision C.3.h.). The County’s GI Plan will include an update on this Countywide/ regional project and the County’s status and plans for integrating this tool into its processes for implementing June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1026 Page | 15 GI . Note that this initiative is currently underway, with cooperation and cost-sharing between the CCCWP and the Alameda Countywide Clean Water Program (ACCWP). The final framework will include an updated version of this project description, if available. 2.6 Design Guidance and Specifications for GI Projects The GI Plan must include general design and construction guidelines, standard specifications and details (or references to those documents) for incorporating GI components into projects within the County. These guidelines and specifications should address the different street and project types within the County, as defined by its land use and transportation characteristics, and allow projects to provide a range of functions and benefits, such as stormwater management, bicycle and pedestrian mobility and safety, public green space, urban forestry, etc. 
 The County will collaborate with other Permittees, Countywide and regionally, to compile, reference, and/or develop this design guidance. Questions to be addressed in the review and compilation period include:  Does existing design guidance address local needs? Are there local conditions or characteristics that require different guidance?  To what extent would additional guidance, if developed, address the needs of multiple projects? Or are the design issues presented by local GI projects so site- specific that designs must be developed individually for each project? The results of this review, and the status of design guidance to be used in future projects, will be discussed and presented in the GI Plan. 2.7 Sizing Requirements for Green Infrastructure Projects The County’s GI Plan must include a requirement that projects be designed to meet the treatment and hydromodification sizing requirements in MRP Provisions C.3.c. and C.3.d. The Permittees may collectively propose an approach on how to proceed should project constraints in nonregulated right of way projects preclude fully meeting the C.3.d. sizing requirements. A BASMAA project is currently underway to analyze hydrologic data and bioretention facility performance under different sizing scenarios. It is anticipated that this project will result in recommendations for sizing GI in nonregulated right of way projects. The County’s GI Plan will describe the outcomes of BASMAA’s efforts and how those outcomes have been incorporated into local GI planning and design practices. BASMAA’s guidance may include criteria to assist Permittees to determine when higher- June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1027 Page | 16 rate tree-box-type biofilters may be a more practical and effective mode of treatment than bioretention. The final framework will include an updated version of this project description, if available. 3.0 Integration with Existing Plans 3.1 Updates to Planning Documents The GI Plan must describe its relationship to other planning documents and efforts within the County and how those planning documents have been updated or modified, if needed, to support and incorporate GI requirements. If any necessary updates or modifications have not been accomplished by the completion of the GI Plan in September 2019, then the GI Plan must include a workplan and schedule to complete them. The County has reviewed its existing municipal planning documents and identified which documents need to be updated or modified to support and/or be consistent with the GI Plan. A summary of the results of the municipal plan review and a schedule for updates or modifications is in Table 2. The GI Plan will also describe a process or processes, including criteria, to ensure future planning documents are consistent with its policies, processes, and tasks. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1028 Page | 17 Table 2. Plans Requiring Updates/Coordination to Support Green Infrastructure Implementation Name of Plan Responsible Department/Staff Last Updated Next Projected Update (completed) General Plan Update [by DCD) DCD: Will Nelson 2005 2020 Climate Action Plan for Unincorporated Contra Costa County DCD: Jody London 2015 NA Capital Road Improvements Preservation Program (CRIPP) Transportation Engineering (TE): Mary Halle 2016 2018 Countywide Bike and Pedestrian Plan TE: Mary Halle; DCD: Robert Sarmiento 2009 2017 Storm Water Resources Plan CCCWP: Rachel Kraai Summer 2017 to 2018 NA County FAA Airport Plans: Buchanan Airport Master Plan (MP) was completed; Byron Airport Master Plan Airports: Keith Freitas; Beth Lee 2008 (Buchanan MP) 2006 (Byron) 2028 2026 Source: County GI Plan TAG (March 2017) 3.2 Adoption of Policies, Ordinances, and Other Legal Mechanisms to Support Green Infrastructure The County will review its existing policies, ordinances, and other legal mechanisms (see Table 3 below), to identify which documents may need to be updated or modified to help implement the GI Plan, and the timing for those actions. All needed updates, modifications, or new mechanism(s) will be completed and adopted (if necessary) by September 30, 2019. County Staff will also collaborate with other Permittees, Countywide and regionally, to ensure policies, ordinances, and other legal mechanisms are consistent with those of other Permittees Countywide and regionally, while being tailored to the specific needs and characteristics of the County. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1029 Page | 18 Table 3. Policies, Ordinances, and Legal Mechanisms to be Reviewed Policy, Ordinance or Mechanism Potential Action and Timeframe Stormwater Management and Discharge Control; Ordinance No. 2005-01, Title 10.14 Revise Application (Chapter 1014-4 to include GI planning requirement; Full Trash capture devices for new commercial and Multi-family development as part of Land Use Permit COA’s Grading Ordinance; Title 7 (Bldg. Regulations), Chapter 716-2 Revisions to Grading Ordinance to be put in Stormwater Mgmt. and Discharge Ordinance PWD — Design Manual GI design criteria and references Title 10 FCD and Drainage Fee Ordinance to accommodate Impervious Surface drainage improvement requirements Drainage fees to be paid for LID (for County bldgs.) but not GI (for roads) Subdivision Ordinance, Title 9 Applicant responsibilities toward GI/SW systems improvement; PWD: Engineering Services Source: County GI Plan TAG (March 2017) June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1030 Page | 19 4.0 Evaluation of Funding Options The GI Plan must include an evaluation of funding options for design, construction, and long-term maintenance of prioritized GI projects, considering local, state, and federal funding sources. The County will analyze possible funding options to raise additional revenue for the projects that will eventually be included in its GI Plan, including capital and operation and maintenance (O&M) costs of these projects. Options for capital project funding include: CA Proposition 1 Stormwater Grant Program implementation grants from the Regional Board; Prop 1 IRWMP, State Coastal Conservancy, Resource Agency, and DWR grants; EPA State Revolving Fund (zero interest loans); the EPA’s San Francisco Bay Water Quality Improvement Fund grants; and California Urban Rivers Grants; Options for O&M funding include development of community facilities districts (CFDs) around roads or business districts to fund and/or maintain GI to be installed. Additional funding options that will be explored by County include: • Off-site Treatment by Developer — An alternative compliance option in which a private Regulated Project (one required to treat runoff from created and replaced impervious surface on the project) would instead treat runoff from an equivalent amount of impervious surface off-site, potentially in the public right-of-way, in LID treatment facilities it would pay to construct (and/or maintain). That is, the private developer would fund and oversee construction of a potential GI project identified by the County. • Grants for Capital Projects — Options for capital project funding include the State Proposition 1 Stormwater Grant Program implementation grants, Prop 1 IRWMP grants, California Urban Rivers Grants, etc. Not only will matching funds be required for many of these grants, the County will also have to develop initial project concepts and designs. For these reasons, dedicated internal funding will be essential to demonstrating the County’s commitment to implementation of the GI Plan. • Payment of In-Lieu Fees — An alternative compliance option in which the developer of a private Regulated Project, in lieu of constructing LID treatment facilities on-site, would pay equivalent in-lieu fees for construction and maintenance of a regional or municipal stormwater treatment (GI) facility. • Public-Private Partnerships — An option in which GI facilities are jointly funded by the municipality and a private organization or land owner for the benefit of both parties. • Regional Project Cost-Sharing — The County will also pursue regional projects in collaboration with neighboring cities, special districts, Caltrans, and other transportation agencies. These regional projects will involve cost-sharing among stakeholders. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1031 Page | 20 5.0 Task List, Timeframes, and Budget 5.1 Tasks and Timeframes This section describes the timeframes for completion of the tasks presented in Section 2 to develop and adopt the County’s GI Plan. Ongoing tasks are currently being worked on; pending tasks are upcoming and so have not been started yet. The tasks identified for this framework are shown in Table 4 below. CCCWP staff and consultants have provided this Model Table with task descriptions, roles, and timeframes that was approved by the CCCWP Management Committee. CCCWP staff made an initial determination of which tasks can be supported by the CCCWP and the CCSWRP and which tasks will need to be completed by the County; it was conducted based on an understanding of available staff time, budget, and resources. It was reviewed and corroborated by the GI Plan TAG. 5.2 Budget The County has included $150,000 in its FY 2017-2018 budget for completion of these tasks toward the preparation of a GI Plan Framework and initiation of the Plan. Based on initial cost estimates, County staff currently plans to propose an additional $200,000 budget for this purpose in Fiscal Year 2018-2019, for a total of $350,000 to be expended on preparation of the GI Plan. See Appendix C for a GI Plan process and budget analysis. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1032 Table 4 Green Infrastructure Planning Tasks, Roles, and Timeframes # Task Description (+ reference to the specific sub-provision within Provision C.3.j. that is addressed by the task) Lead Estimated Timeframe Resources and Notes This task list and schedule is a living document and will be refined over the course of the Green Infrastructure Plan development process. Local CCCWP BASMAA Tasks that should have been completed or should be scheduled now 1 Provide a staff report to the County Board of Supervisors (BOS) - Transportation, Water and Infrastructure Committee regarding the Green Infrastructure Provision (C.3.j.i.(4)(c))  June - October, 2016 See the CCCWP model staff report; given by Mitch Avalon 2 Provide a presentation and training to interdepartmental staff regarding the Green Infrastructure Provision (C.3.j.i.(4)(b))  Feb. 2017 Adapted the CCCWP model presentation and gave to County GI Plan TAG 3 Convene an interdepartmental Green Infrastructure Plan TAG  Feb. 2017 4 Identify planning documents requiring updates and integration with Green Infrastructure planning (C.3.j.i.(4)(h))  Feb. 2017 5 Develop a draft budget and staff assignments for completing the Green Infrastructure Plan during 2017-2019  October 2016 Given to BOS - Transportation, Water and Infrastructure Committee 6 Establish procedures and responsibilities for reviewing capital improvement projects (early implementation) (C.3.j.ii.)  April - June 30, 2016 Used BASMAA “Guidance for Identifying Green Infrastructure Potential in Municipal Capital Improvement Projects” and met with relevant County PWD divisions. 7 Begin discussions of strategy for developing capacity to plan, seek funding for, and implement Green Infrastructure projects  June 2016 to Feb. 2017 8 Coordinate within and between departments to develop concepts for integrated projects that serve multiple objectives  Dec. 2016 to Feb. 2017 State Coastal Conservancy Urban Greening Grant Proposal: “N. Richmond Watershed Connections” Tasks to complete by June 30, 2017 9 Complete the Green Infrastructure Plan Framework and have it approved by the Council, Board, or City/Town Manager (C.3.j.i.(1))) and (C.3.j.i.(5)(a)) A Create a schedule for approval of the Framework  April 2017 B Prepare a draft Framework  April 2017 See the Framework template provided by CCCWP C Circulate and obtain comments on the draft Framework from TAG  April 2017 D Finalize Framework  May 2017 E Prepare a Staff Report and Presentation (as needed) for the Framework  May 2017 F Obtain Board of Supervisors Action  By June 30 Tasks to complete July 1, 2017 – September 30, 2019 10 Draft Green Infrastructure Plan (C.3.j.i.(2)) A Review and revise schedule for provision of resources to be provided countywide or regionally  July-Aug. 2017 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1033 # Task Description (+ reference to the specific sub-provision within Provision C.3.j. that is addressed by the task) Lead Estimated Timeframe Resources and Notes This task list and schedule is a living document and will be refined over the course of the Green Infrastructure Plan development process. Local CCCWP BASMAA B Obtain consultant resources to assist with Plan preparation  Aug. 2017 C Create a detailed schedule for completion and approval of the Green Infrastructure Plan, and for submittal with the 2019 Annual Report  Aug. 2017 D Prepare a Green Infrastructure Plan Template  Dec. 2017 The scope of this deliverable was discussed with the CCCWP Development Committee in March 2017. E Draft the Green Infrastructure Plan  Jan. 2018 – Feb. 2019 The Green Infrastructure Plan will include locally originated elements and adaptation of resources produced countywide and regionally (see tasks below) F Circulate, obtain comments and revise the draft Plan  Mar.-May 2019 G Board of Supervisors action to approve the Green Infrastructure Plan and any policies required to implement the Plan  May – Aug. 2019 H Submit the Green Infrastructure Plan  Sept. 2019 11 Mechanism for Identifying and Prioritizing Projects A Create or adopt a mechanism to locate, prioritize, and map areas for potential and planned public projects on a drainage-area-specific basis (C.3.j.i.(2)(a))  March 2018* *Tasks 4.4 & 4.5 in CCSWRP Scope of Work. Note that this schedule is currently under review with the State Water Board. B Identify targets for the amount of impervious surface to be retrofitted by 2020, 2030, and 2040 (C.3.j.i.(2)(c))   March 2018 The task will be further discussed with the CCCWP Development Committee in 2017. It is assumed that the CCCWP will, at a minimum, provide guidance on the methodology to complete this task C Identify and prioritize projects and/or areas for potential projects for implementation by 2020, 2030, and 2040, consistent with the Reasonable Assurance Analysis (C.3.j.i.(2)(b) and C.3.j.iv.(1))   March 2018 The task will be further discussed with the CCCWP Development Committee in 2017. It is assumed that the CCCWP will, at a minimum, provide guidance on the methodology to complete this task 12 Project Amount and Locations of Private Development (C.3.j.i.(2)(c)) A Identify or develop a methodology for projecting amount and locations of private development  July 2017 CCCWP will coordinate with other countywide stormwater programs with the aim of making methodologies consistent regionally. B Apply methodology and revise/validate projections of private development based on local understanding and knowledge of development patterns  June 2018 13 List of Prioritized Projects (C.3.j.i.(2)(b)) A Develop list of project concepts and prioritize based on evaluation of multiple benefits  Dec. 2017* *Task 4.5 in the CCSWRP Scope of Work. Note that this schedule is currently under review with the State Water Board. B Revise/validate project lists based on local knowledge  Jan.-Mar. 2018 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1034 # Task Description (+ reference to the specific sub-provision within Provision C.3.j. that is addressed by the task) Lead Estimated Timeframe Resources and Notes This task list and schedule is a living document and will be refined over the course of the Green Infrastructure Plan development process. Local CCCWP BASMAA C Identify projects that may be candidates for grant funding, including funding under Round 2 of the Prop. 1 Stormwater Grant Program  March 2018 14 Early Implementation A Prepare workplans to complete prioritized projects produced from capital improvement program review (C.3.j.i.(2)(j))  Nov.-Dec. 2017 And subsequent years. Workplans should be produced following reporting of projects in Annual Report and in time for consideration in following year’s budget. B Prepare workplans for additional staff-identified Green Infrastructure projects  Nov.-Dec. 2017 And for subsequent years. C Incorporate the lists of early implementation projects and additional staff- identified projects and associated workplans into the Green Infrastructure Plan  Jan. 2019 15 Supporting Elements and Associated Tasks A Develop a model ordinance, policy or policies for Green Infrastructure Plan Implementation (C.3.j.i.(3))  Dec 2018 The need for CCCWP assistance with this task, and the scope of any resulting deliverables, will be discussed with the CCCWP Development Committee in 2017 and 2018. B Review local ordinances, policies, and resolutions and determine if updates are needed to support implementation of Green Infrastructure. Document this review in the 2019 Annual Report (C.3.j.i.(5)(c))  June 2018 C Prepare an analysis of potential funding options for Green Infrastructure Projects (C.3.j.i.(2))  Dec 2017 The scope of this deliverable will be further discussed with the CCCWP Development Committee in Spring 2017. D Analyze funding options for Green Infrastructure Projects and applicability to local conditions (C.3.j.i.(2)(k))  June 2018 E Develop Green Infrastructure Design Guidelines for streetscapes and other public infrastructure (C.3.j.i.(2)(e))  June 2018 The scope of this deliverable will be further discussed with the CCCWP Development Committee in Spring 2017. F Develop specifications and typical design details for Green Infrastructure (C.3.j.i.(2)(f))  June 2018 The scope of this deliverable will be further discussed with the CCCWP Development Committee in Spring 2017. G Develop sizing criteria for Green Infrastructure facilities in non-Regulated right-of-way projects (C.3.j.i.(2)(g))  Sep. 2017 See BASMAA’s December 2016 RFP to analyze hydrologic data and bioretention facility performance H Develop regionally consistent methods to track and report implementation of green infrastructure measures, including load reductions achieved (C.3.j.iv.(1))  Dec. 2017 Being developed in cooperation with ACCWP 16 Update Planning Documents (C.3.j.i.(2)(h)) A Review planning documents and identify potentially needed updates  Mar. 2017 B Update planning documents  Jul. 2017 – Jun. 2019 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1035 # Task Description (+ reference to the specific sub-provision within Provision C.3.j. that is addressed by the task) Lead Estimated Timeframe Resources and Notes This task list and schedule is a living document and will be refined over the course of the Green Infrastructure Plan development process. Local CCCWP BASMAA C Identify remaining updates and reference in Green Infrastructure Plan (C.3.j.i.(2)(i))  Jul. 2019 17 Outreach and Education (C.3.j.i.(4)) A Participate in countywide and regional Green Infrastructure outreach and education efforts, including general outreach and targeted outreach and training for professionals involved in infrastructure planning and design (C.3.j.iii.)  Jul. 2017 – Jun. 2019 B Implement Green Infrastructure outreach and education in connection with planning and design of green infrastructure projects (C.3.j.i.(4)(a))  Now – Jun. 2019 And ongoing C Develop a stakeholder education and engagement plan for Green Infrastructure Plan development, including outreach and education about the required Green Infrastructure Plan elements.  CCCWP to assist with content D Incorporate Green Infrastructure outreach on municipal websites  Now – Jun. 2019 CCCWP to assist with content E Provide updates to elected officials on Green Infrastructure requirements and methods of implementation (C.3.j.i.(4)(c))  Periodic CCCWP to assist with content June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1036 BASMAA Development Committee Guidance for Identifying Green Infrastructure Potential in Municipal Capital Improvement Program Projects May 6, 2016 Background In the recently reissued Municipal Regional Stormwater Permit (“MRP 2.0”), Provision C.3.j. requires Permittees to develop and implement Green Infrastructure Plans to reduce the adverse water quality impacts of urbanization on receiving waters over the long term. Provisions C.11 and C.12 require the Permittees to reduce discharges of Mercury and PCBs, and portion of these load reductions must be achieved by implementing Green Infrastructure. Specifically, Permittees collectively must implement Green Infrastructure to reduce mercury loading by 48 grams/year and PCB loading by 120 grams/year by 2020, and plan for substantially larger reductions in the following decades. Green Infrastructure on both public and private land will help to meet these load reduction requirements, improve water quality, and provide multiple other benefits as well. Implementation on private land is achieved by implementing stormwater requirements for new development and redevelopment (Provision C.3.a. through Provision C.3.i.). These requirements were carried forward, largely unchanged, from MRP 1.0. MRP 2.0 defines Green Infrastructure as: Infrastructure that uses vegetation, soils, and natural processes to manage water and create healthier urban environments. At the scale of a city or county, green infrastructure refers to the patchwork of natural areas that provides habitat, flood protection, cleaner air, and cleaner water. At the scale of a neighborhood or site, green infrastructure refers to stormwater management systems that mimic nature by soaking up and storing water. In practical terms, most green infrastructure will take the form of diverting runoff from existing streets, roofs, and parking lots to one of two stormwater management strategies: 1. Dispersal to vegetated areas, where sufficient landscaped area is available and slopes are not too steep. 2. LID (bioretention and infiltration) facilities, built according to criteria similar to those currently required for regulated private development and redevelopment projects under Provision C.3. In some cases, the use of tree-box-type biofilters may be appropriate 1. In other cases, where conditions are appropriate, existing impervious pavements may be removed and replaced with pervious pavements. In MRP 2.0, Provision C.3.j. includes requirements for Green Infrastructure planning and implementation. Provision C.3.j. has two main elements to be implemented by municipalities: 1. Preparation of a Green Infrastructure Plan for the inclusion of LID drainage design into storm drain infrastructure on public and private land, including streets, roads, storm drains, etc. 2. Early implementation of green infrastructure projects (“no missed opportunities”), This guidance addresses the second of these requirements. The intent of the “no missed opportunities” requirement is to ensure that no major infrastructure project is built without assessing the opportunity for incorporation of green infrastructure features. Provision C.3.j.ii. requires that each Permittee prepare and maintain a list of green infrastructure projects, public and private, that are already planned for implementation during the permit term (not including C.3-regulated projects), and infrastructure projects planned for 1 Standard proprietary tree-box-type biofilters are considered to be non-LID treatment and will only be allowed under certain circumstances. Guidance on use and sizing of these facilities will be provided in a separate document. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1037 implementation during the permit term that have potential for green infrastructure measures. The list must be submitted with each Annual Report, including: “… a summary of how each public infrastructure project with green infrastructure potential will include green infrastructure measures to the maximum extent practical during the permit term. For any public infrastructure project where implementation of green infrastructure measures is not practicable, submit a brief description for the project and the reasons green infrastructure measures were impracticable to implement”. This requirement has no specified start date; “during the permit term” means beginning January 1, 2016 and before December 31, 2020. The first Annual Report submittal date will be September 30, 2016. Note that this guidance primarily addresses the review of proposed or planned public projects for green infrastructure opportunities. The Permittee may also be aware of proposed or planned private projects, not subject to LID treatment requirements, that may have the opportunity to incorporate green infrastructure. These should be addressed in the same way as planned public projects, as described below. Procedure for Review of Planned Public Projects and Annual Reporting The municipality’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP) project list provides a good starting point for review of proposed public infrastructure projects. Review of other lists of public infrastructure projects, such as those proposed within separately funded special districts (e.g., lighting and landscape districts, maintenance districts, and community facilities districts), may also be appropriate. This section describes a two-part procedure for conducting the review. Part 1 – Initial Screening The first step in reviewing a CIP or other public project list is to screen out certain types of projects from further consideration. For example, some projects (e.g., interior remodels, traffic signal replacement) can be readily identified as having no green infrastructure potential. Other projects may appear on the list with only a title, and it may be too early to identify whether green infrastructure could be included. Still others have already progressed past the point where the design can reasonably be changed (this will vary from project to project, depending on available budget and schedule). Some “projects” listed in a CIP may provide budget for multiple maintenance or minor construction projects throughout the jurisdiction or a portion of the jurisdiction, such as a tree planting program, curb and sidewalk repair/upgrade, or ADA curb/ramp compliance. It is recommended that these types of projects not be included in the review process described herein. The priority for incorporating green infrastructure into these types of projects needs to be assessed as part of the Permittees’ development of Green Infrastructure Plans, and standard details and specifications need to be developed and adopted. During this permit term, Permittees will evaluate select projects, project types, and/or groups of projects as case studies and develop an approach as part of Green Infrastructure planning. The projects removed through the initial screening process do not need to be reported to the Water Board in the Permittee’s Annual Report. However, the process should be documented and records kept as to the reason the project was removed from further consideration. Note that projects that were determined to be too early to assess will need to be reassessed during the next fiscal year’s review. The following categories of projects may be screened out of the review process in a given fiscal year: 1. Projects with No Potential - The project is identified in initial screening as having no green infrastructure potential based on the type of project. For example, the project does not include any exterior work. Attachment 1 provides a suggested list of such projects that Permittees may use as a model for their own internal process. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1038 2. Projects Too Early to Assess – There is not yet enough information to assess the project for green infrastructure potential, or the project is not scheduled to begin design within the permit term (January 2016 – December 2020). If the project is scheduled to begin within the permit term, an assessment will be conducted if and when the project moves forward to conceptual design. 3. Projects Too Late to Change – The project is under construction or has moved to a stage of design in which changes cannot be made. The stage of design at which it is too late to incorporate green infrastructure measures varies with each project, so a “percent-complete” threshold has not been defined. Some projects may have funding tied to a particular conceptual design and changes cannot be made even early in the design process, while others may have adequate budget and time within the construction schedule to make changes late in the design process. Agencies will need to make judgments on a case-by-case basis. 4. Projects Consisting of Maintenance or Minor Construction Work Orders – The “project” includes budgets for multiple maintenance or minor construction work orders throughout the jurisdiction or a portion of the jurisdiction. These types of projects will not be individually reviewed for green infrastructure opportunity but will be considered as part of a municipality’s Green Infrastructure Plan. Part 2 – Assessment of Green Infrastructure Potential After the initial screening, the remaining projects either already include green infrastructure or will need to go through an assessment process to determine whether or not there is potential to incorporate green infrastructure. A recommended process for conducting the assessment is provided later in this guidance. As a result of the assessment, the project will fall into one of the following categories with associated annual reporting requirements. Attachment 2 provides the relevant pages of the FY 15-16 Annual Report template for reference.  Project is a C.3-regulated project and will include LID treatment. Reporting: Follow current C.3 guidance and report the project in Table C.3.b.iv.(2) of the Annual Report for the fiscal year in which the project is approved.  Project already includes green infrastructure and is funded. Reporting: List the project in “Table B-Planned Green Infrastructure Projects” in the Annual Report, indicate the planning or implementation status, and describe the green infrastructure measures to be included.  Project may have green infrastructure potential pending further assessment of feasibility, incremental cost, and availability of funding. Reporting: If the feasibility assessment is not complete and/or funding has not been identified, list the project in “Table A-Public Projects Reviewed for Green Infrastructure” in the Annual Report. In the “GI Included?” column, state either “TBD” (to be determined) if the assessment is not complete, or “Yes” if it has been determined that green infrastructure is feasible. In the rightmost column, describe the green infrastructure measures considered and/or proposed, and note the funding and other contingencies for inclusion of green infrastructure in the project. Once funding for the project has been identified, the project should be moved to “Table B-Planned Green Infrastructure Projects” in future Annual Reports.  Project does not have green infrastructure potential. A project-specific assessment has been completed, and Green Infrastructure is impracticable. Reporting: In the Annual Report, list the project in “Table A-Public Projects Reviewed for Green Infrastructure”. In the “GI Included?” column, state “No.” Briefly state the reasons for the determination in the rightmost column. Prepare more detailed documentation of the reasons for the determination and keep it in the project files. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1039 Process for Assessing Green Infrastructure Potential of a Public Infrastructure Project Initial Assessment of Green Infrastructure Potential Consider opportunities that may be associated with:  Alterations to roof drainage from existing buildings  New or replaced pavement or drainage structures (including gutters, inlets, or pipes)  Concrete work  Landscaping, including tree planting  Streetscape improvements and intersection improvements (other than signals) Step 1: Information Collection/Reconnaissance For projects that include alterations to building drainage, identify the locations of roof leaders and downspouts, and where they discharge or where they are connected to storm drains. For street and landscape projects:  Evaluate potential opportunities to substitute pervious pavements for impervious pavements.  Identify and locate drainage structures, including storm drain inlets or catch basins.  Identify and locate drainage pathways, including curb and gutter. Identify landscaped areas and paved areas that are adjacent to, or down gradient from, roofs or pavement. These are potential facility locations. If there are any such locations, continue to the next step. Note that the project area boundaries may be, but are not required to be, expanded to include potential green infrastructure facilities. Step 2: Preliminary Sizing and Drainage Analysis Beginning with the potential LID facility locations that seem most feasible, identify possible pathways to direct drainage from roofs and/or pavement to potential LID facility locations—by sheet flow, valley gutters, trench drains, or (where gradients are steeper) via pipes, based on existing grades and drainage patterns. Where existing grades constrain natural drainage to potential facilities, the use of pumps may be considered (as a less preferable option). Delineate (roughly) the drainage area tributary to each potential LID facility location. Typically, this requires site reconnaissance, which may or may not include the use of a level to measure relative elevations. Use the following preliminary sizing factor (facility area/tributary area) for the potential facility location and determine which of the following could be constructed within the existing right-of- way or adjacent vacant land. Note that these sizing factors are guidelines (not strict rules, but targets):  Sizing factor ≥ 0.5 for dispersal to landscape or pervious pavement 2 (i.e., a maximum 2:1 ratio of impervious area to pervious area)  Sizing factor ≥ 0.04 for bioretention  Sizing factor ≥ 0.004 (or less) for tree-box-type biofilters For bioretention facilities requiring underdrains and tree-box-type biofilters, note if there are potential connections from the underdrain to the storm drain system (typically 2.0 feet below soil surface for bioretention facilities, and 3.5 feet below surface for tree-box-type biofilters). 2 Note that pervious pavement systems are typically designed to infiltrate only the rain falling on the pervious pavement itself, with the allowance for small quantities of runoff from adjacent impervious areas. If significant runoff from adjacent areas is anticipated, preliminary sizing considerations should include evaluation of the depth of drain rock layer needed based on permeability of site soils. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1040 If, in this step, you have confirmed there may be feasible potential facility locations, continue to the next step. Step 3: Barriers and Conflicts Note that barriers and conflicts do not necessarily mean implementation is infeasible; however, they need to be identified and taken into account in future decision-making, as they may affect cost or public acceptance of the project. Note issues such as:  Confirmed or potential conflicts with subsurface utilities  Known or unknown issues with property ownership, or need for acquisition or easements  Availability of water supply for irrigation, or lack thereof  Extent to which green infrastructure is an “add on” vs. integrated with the rest of the project Step 4: Project Budget and Schedule Consider sources of funding that may be available for green infrastructure. It is recognized that lack of budget may be a serious constraint for the addition of green infrastructure in public projects. For example, acquisition of additional right-of-way or easements for roadway projects is not always possible. Short and long term maintenance costs also need to be considered, and jurisdictions may not have a funding source for landscape maintenance, especially along roadways. The objective of this process is to identify opportunities for green infrastructure, so that if and when funding becomes available, implementation may be possible. Note any constraints on the project schedule, such as a regulatory mandate to complete the project by a specific date, grant requirements, etc., that could complicate aligning a separate funding stream for the green infrastructure element. Consider whether cost savings could be achieved by integrating the project with other planned projects, such as pedestrian or bicycle safety improvement projects, street beautification, etc., if the schedule allows. Step 5: Assessment—Does the Project Have Green Infrastructure Potential? Consider the ancillary benefits of green infrastructure, including opportunities for improving the quality of public spaces, providing parks and play areas, providing habitat, urban forestry, mitigating heat island effects, aesthetics, and other valuable enhancements to quality of life. Based on the information above, would it make sense to include green infrastructure into this project—if funding were available for the potential incremental costs of including green infrastructure in the project? Identify any additional conditions that would have to be met for green infrastructure elements to be constructed consequent with the project. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1041 Attachment 1 Examples of Projects with No Potential for Green Infrastructure  Projects with no exterior work (e.g., interior remodels)  Projects involving exterior building upgrades or equipment (e.g., HVAC, solar panels, window replacement, roof repairs and maintenance)  Projects related to development and/or continued funding of municipal programs or related organizations  Projects related to technical studies, mapping, aerial photography, surveying, database development/upgrades, monitoring, training, or update of standard specs and details  Construction of new streetlights, traffic signals or communication facilities  Minor bridge and culvert repairs/replacement  Non-stormwater utility projects (e.g., sewer or water main repairs/replacement, utility undergrounding, treatment plant upgrades)  Equipment purchase or maintenance (including vehicles, street or park furniture, equipment for sports fields and golf courses, etc.)  Irrigation system installation, upgrades or repairs June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1042 Attachment 2 Excerpts from the C.3 Section of the FY 15-16 Annual Report Template: Tables for Reporting C.3-Regulated Projects and Green Infrastructure Projects June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1043 C.3.b.iv.(2) ►Regulated Projects Reporting Table (part 1) – Projects Approved During the Fiscal Year Reporting Period Project Name Project No. Project Location 9, Street Address Name of Developer Project Phase No.10 Project Type & Description11 Project Watershed 12 Total Site Area (Acres) Total Area of Land Disturbed (Acres) Total New Impervious Surface Area (ft2)13 Total Replaced Impervious Surface Area (ft2)14 Total Pre- Project Impervious Surface Area 15(ft2) Total Post- Project Impervious Surface Area 16(ft2) Private Projects Public Projects Comments: Guidance: If necessary, provide any additional details or clarifications needed about listed projects in this box. Do not leave any cells blank. 9Include cross streets 10If a project is being constructed in phases, indicate the phase number and use a separate row entry for each phase. If not, enter “NA”. 11Project Type is the type of development (i.e., new and/or redevelopment). Example descriptions of development are: 5-story office building, residential with 160 single-family homes with five 4-story buildings to contain 200 condominiums, 100 unit 2-story shopping mall, mixed use retail and residential development (apartments), industrial warehouse. 12State the watershed(s) in which the Regulated Project is located. Downstream watershed(s) may be included, but this is optional. 13All impervious surfaces added to any area of the site that was previously existing pervious surface. 14All impervious surfaces added to any area of the site that was previously existing impervious surface. 15For redevelopment projects, state the pre-project impervious surface area. 16For redevelopment projects, state the post-project impervious surface area. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1044 C.3.b.iv.(2) ►Regulated Projects Reporting Table (part 2) – Projects Approved During the Fiscal Year Reporting Period (public projects) Project Name Project No. Approval Date 29 Date Construction Scheduled to Begin Source Control Measures30 Site Design Measures 31 Treatment Systems Approved32 Operation & Maintenance Responsibility Mechanism 33 Hydraulic Sizing Criteria 34 Alternative Compliance Measures35/36 Alternative Certification 37 HM Controls 38/39 Public Projects Comments: Guidance: If necessary, provide any additional details or clarifications needed about listed projects in this box. Note that MRP Provision C.3.c. contains specific requirements for LID site design and source control measures, as well as treatment measures, for all Regulated Projects. Entries in these columns should not be “None” or “NA”. Do not leave any cells blank. 29For public projects, enter the plans and specifications approval date. 30List source control measures approved for the project. Examples include: properly designed trash storage areas; storm drain stenciling or signage; efficient landscape irrigation systems; etc. 31List site design measures approved for the project. Examples include: minimize impervious surfaces; conserve natural areas, including existing trees or other vegetation, and soils; construct sidewalks, walkways, and/or patios with permeable surfaces, etc. 32List all approved stormwater treatment system(s) to be installed onsite or at a joint stormwater treatment facility (e.g., flow through planter, bioretention facility, infiltration basin, etc.). 33List the legal mechanism(s) (e.g., maintenance plan for O&M by public entity, etc…) that have been or will be used to assign responsibility for the maintenance of the post-construction stormwater treatment systems. 34See Provision C.3.d.i. “Num eric Sizing Criteria for Stormwater Treatment Systems” for list of hydraulic sizing design criteria. Enter the corresponding provision number of the appropriate criterion (i.e., 1.a., 1.b., 2.a., 2.b., 2.c., or 3). 35For Alternative Compliance at an offsite location in accordance with Provision C.3.e.i.(1), on a separate page, give a discussion of the alternative compliance site including the information specified in Provision C.3.b.v.(1)(m)(i) for the offsite project. 36For Alternative Compliance by paying in-lieu fees in accordance with Provision C.3.e.i.(2), on a separate page, provide the information specified in Provision C.3.b.v.(1)(m)(ii) for the Regional Project. 37Note whether a third party was used to certify the project design complies with Provision C.3.d. 38If HM control is not required, state why not. 39If HM control is required, state control method used (e.g., method to design and size device(s) or method(s) used to meet the HM Standard, and description of device(s) or method(s) used, such as detention basin(s), biodetention unit(s), regional detention basin, or in-stream control). June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1045 C.3.j.ii.(2) ► Table A - Public Projects Reviewed for Green Infrastructure Project Name and Location 43 Project Description Status 44 GI Included?45 Description of GI Measures Considered and/or Proposed or Why GI is Impracticable to Implement 46 EXAMPLE: Storm drain retrofit, Stockton and Taylor Installation of new storm drain to accommodate the 10-yr storm event Beginning planning and design phase TBD Bioretention cells (i.e., linear bulb-outs) will be considered when street modification designs are incorporated C.3.j.ii.(2) ► Table B - Planned Green Infrastructure Projects Project Name and Location 47 Project Description Planning or Implementation Status Green Infrastructure Measures Included EXAMPLE: Martha Gardens Green Alleys Project Retrofit of degraded pavement in urban alleyways lacking good drainage Construction completed October 17, 2015 The project drains replaced concrete pavement and existing adjacent structures to a center strip of pervious pavement and underlying infiltration trench. 43 List each public project that is going through your agency’s process for identifying projects with green infrastructure potential. 44 Indicate status of project, such as: beginning design, under design (or X% design), projected completion date, completed final design date, etc. 45 Enter “Yes” if project will include GI measures, “No” if GI measures are impracticable to implement, or “TBD” if this has not yet been determined. 46 Provide a summary of how each public infrastructure project with green infrastructure potential will include green infrastructure measures to the maximum extent practicable during the permit term. If review of the project indicates that implementation of green infrastructure measures is not practicable, provide the reasons why green infrastructure measures are impracticable to implement. 47 List each planned (and expected to be funded) public and private green infrastructure project that is not also a Regulated Project as defined in Provision C.3.b.ii. Note that funding for green infrastructure components may be anticipated but is not guaranteed to be available or sufficient. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1046 PROPOSITION 1 STORM WATER CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT AND CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD PLANNING GRANT STORM WATER PLANNING CONTRA COSTA WATERSHEDS STORM WATER RESOURCES PLAN AGREEMENT NO. D1612604 GRANT FUNDS: $ 499,180 ELIGIBLE START DATE: __________________ WORK COMPLETION DATE: JUNE 30, 2019 FINAL DISBURSEMENT REQUEST DATE: JULY 31, 2019 RECORDS RETENTION TERM END DATE: JUNE 30, 2055 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1047 WHEREAS, 1. The State Water Board is authorized to provide funding under this Agreement pursuant to the following: • Proposition 1 Storm Water - Section 79747 of the Water Code (Prop 1) 2. The State Water Board determines eligibility for financial assistance, determines a reasonable schedule for providing financial assistance, establishes compliance with Prop 1, and establishes the terms and conditions of a funding agreement. 3. The Recipient has applied to the State Water Board for funding for the Project described in Exhibit A of this Agreement and the State Water Board has selected the application for funding through a competitive process. 4. The State Water Board proposes to assist in funding the costs of the Project, and the Recipient desires to participate as a recipient of financial assistance from the State Water Board, upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, all pursuant to Prop 1; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, mutual representations, covenants and agreements in this Agreement, the State Water Board and the Recipient, each binding itself, its successors and assigns, do mutually promise, covenant, and agree as follows: 1. Definitions. Unless otherwise specified, each capitalized term used in this Agreement has the following meaning: “Agreement” means this Grant Agreement, including all exhibits and attachments hereto. “Authorized Representative” means the duly appointed representative of the Recipient as set forth in the certified original of the Recipient’s authorizing resolution that designates the authorized representative by title. “Days” means calendar days unless otherwise expressly indicated. “Disbursement Period” means the period during which Grant Funds may be disbursed. “Disbursement Request” means the form used by the Recipient to document Match Funds and request reimbursement of Project Costs. “Division” means the Division of Financial Assistance of the State Water Board or any other segment of the State Water Board authorized to administer the funding program (s) set forth in Section 1. “Eligible Start Date” means the date set forth in Exhibit B, establishing the date on or after which reimbursable Project Costs may be incurred and eligible for reimbursement hereunder. “Final Disbursement Request Date” means the date established in Exhibit B, after which date, no further Grant Funds disbursements may be requested. “Fiscal Year” means the period of twelve (12) months terminating on June 30 of any year. “Force Account” means the use of the Recipient's own employees or resources for the Project. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1048 “GAAP” means generally accepted accounting principles, as issued by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board. “Grant Contact” means the employee of the Recipient that has been delegated by the Project Director to oversee the day-to-day activities of the Project. “Grant Funds” means funds provided by the State Water Board towards eligible reimbursable Project Costs. “Grant Manager” means the person designated by the State Water Board to manage performance of the Agreement. The Grant Manager is set forth in Section 2 of this agreement. “Guidelines” means the State Water Board’s “Proposition 1 Storm W ater Grant Program Guidelines,” as amended from time to time. “Indirect Costs” means those costs that are incurred for a common or joint purpose benefiting more than one cost objective and are not readily assignable to the Project (i.e., costs that are not directly related to the Project). Examples of Indirect Costs include, but are not limited to: central service costs; general administration of the Recipient; non-project-specific accounting and personnel services performed within the Recipient’s organization; depreciation or use allowances on buildings and equipment; the costs of operating and maintaining non-project-specific facilities; tuition and conference fees; generic overhead or markup; and taxes. “Match Funds” means funds provided by the Recipient towards the Project Costs incurred after November 4, 2014. “Party Contact” means, for the Recipient, the Authorized Representative of the Recipient or any designee of the Authorized Representative, and, for the State Water Board, the Grant Manager, or the Program Analyst. “Project” means the Project as described in Exhibit A and in the documents incorporated by reference. “Project Completion” means, as determined by the Division, that the Project is complete to the reasonable satisfaction of the Division. “Project Costs” means the incurred costs of the Recipient which are eligible under this Agreement, which are allowable costs as defined under the Guidelines, and which are reasonable, necessary and allocable by the Recipient to the Project under GAAP. “Project Director” means an employee of the Recipient designated by the Authorized Representative to be responsible for the overall management of the administrative and technical aspects of the executed Agreement. The Project Director is set forth in Section 2 of this Agreement. “Recipient” means the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District. “Regional Water Quality Control Board” or “Regional Water Board” means the appropriate Regional Water Quality Control Board. “State” means State of California. “State Water Board” means the California State Water Resources Control Board, an administrative and regulatory agency of the State of California. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1049 “SWRP Guidelines” means the State Water Resources Control Board’s “Storm Water Resource Plan Guidelines” as amended from time to time. “Work Completion” means the Recipient’s submittal of all work set forth under Exhibit A for review and approval by the Division. The Division may require corrective work to be performed prior to Project Completion. Any work occurring after the Work Completion Date will not be reimbursed under this Agreement. “Work Completion Date” means the date set forth in Exhibit A that is the last date on which Project Costs may be incurred under this Agreement. “Year” means calendar year unless otherwise expressly indicated. 2. Party Contacts. The Party Contacts during the term of this Agreement are: State Water Board Recipient: Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Section: Division of Financial Assistance Section: Name: Kelley List, Grant Manager Name: Rachel Kraai, Project Director Address: 1001 I Street, 17th Floor Address: 255 Glacier Drive City, State, Zip: Sacramento, CA 95814 City, State, Zip: Martinez, CA 94553 Phone: (916) 319-9226 Phone: (925) 313-2042 Fax: (916) 341-5296 Fax: (925) 313-2301 e-mail: Kelley.List@waterboards.ca.gov e-mail: Rachel.Kraai@pw.cccounty.us Direct inquiries to: State Water Board Recipient: Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Section: Division of Financial Assistance Section: Attention: Kari Holzgang, Program Analyst Name: Fan Ventura, Grant Contact Address: 1001 I Street, 17th Floor Address: 255 Glacier Drive City, State, Zip: Sacramento, CA 95814 City, State, Zip: Martinez, CA 94553 Phone: (916) 341-5461 Phone: (925) 313-2194 Fax: (916) 341-5296 Fax: (925) 313-2301 e-mail: Kari.Holzgang@waterboards.ca.gov e-mail: Fan.Ventura@pw.cccounty.us The Recipient may change its Project Director upon written notice to the Grant Manager, which notice shall be accompanied by authorization from the Recipient’s Authorized Representative. The State Water Board will notify the Project Director of any changes to its Party Contacts. 3. Exhibits and Appendices Incorporated. The following exhibits and appendices to this Agreement, including any amendments and supplements hereto, are hereby incorporated herein and made a part of this Agreement: EXHIBIT A – SCOPE OF WORK EXHIBIT B – FUNDING PROVISIONS EXHIBIT C – STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1050 4. Recipient Representations and Commitments. The Recipient represents, warrants, and commits to the following as of the date signed by the Recipient and continuing thereafter for the term of the Agreement: (a) General Commitments. The Recipient accepts and agrees to comply with all terms, provisions, conditions, and commitments of this Agreement, including all incorporated documents, and to fulfill all assurances, declarations, representations, and commitments made by the Recipient in its application, accompanying documents, and communications filed in support of its request for financial assistance and throughout the term of this Agreement. (b) Authorization and Validity. The execution and delivery of this Agreement, including all incorporated documents, has been duly authorized. This Agreement constitutes a valid and binding obligation of the Recipient, enforceable in accordance with its terms, except as such enforcement may be limited by law. (c) No Violations. The execution, delivery, and performance by Recipient of this Agreement, including all incorporated documents, do not violate any provision of any law or regulation in effect as of the date set forth on the first page hereof, or result in any breach or default under any contract, obligation, indenture, or other instrument to which Recipient is a party or by which Recipient is bound as of the date set forth on the first page hereof. (d) No Litigation. There are no pending or, to Recipient’s knowledge, threatened actions, claims, investigations, suits, or proceedings before any governmental authority, court, or administrative agency which affect the financial condition or operations of the Recipient, and/or the Project. (e) Solvency. None of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement will be or have been made with an actual intent to hinder, delay, or defraud any present or future creditors of Recipient. As of the date set forth on the first page hereof, Recipient is solvent and will not be rendered insolvent by the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. Recipient is able to pay its debts as they become due. (f) Legal Status and Eligibility. Recipient is duly organized and existing and in good standing under the laws of the State of California, and will remain so during the term of this Agreement. Recipient shall at all times maintain its current legal existence and preserve and keep in full force and effect its legal rights and authority. Recipient shall maintain its eligibility for funding under this Agreement for the term of this Agreement. (g) Good Standing. The Recipient is currently in compliance with the state requirements set forth in Exhibit C. Within the preceding ten years, the Recipient has not failed to demonstrate compliance with previous state audit disallowances. (h) Insurance. Recipient maintains sufficient insurance coverage considering the scope of this Agreement, including, for example, but not necessarily limited to, General Liability, Automobile Liability, Worker’s Compensation and Employer’s Liability, Professional Liability. 5. Project Completion. The Recipient shall expeditiously proceed with and complete the Project in accordance with this Agreement. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1051 6. Notice. (a) The Recipient shall notify the Division in writing within five (5) working days of the occurrence of the following: (1) Bankruptcy, insolvency, receivership or similar event of the Recipient; or (2) Actions taken pursuant to state law in anticipation of filing for bankruptcy. (b) The Recipient shall notify the Division within 10 working days of any litigation pending or threatened against Recipient regarding its continued existence, consideration of dissolution, or disincorporation. (c) The Recipient shall notify the Division promptly of the following: (1) Any proposed change in the scope of the Project. Under no circumstances may the Recipient make changes to the scope of the Project without receiving prior review and approval by the Division. Most changes will require an amendment to this Agreement; (2) Cessation of work on the Project where such cessation of work is expected to or does extend for a period of thirty (30) days or more; (3) Any circumstance, combination of circumstances, or condition, which is expected to or does delay Work Completion; (4) Any monitoring activities such that the State Water Board Division of Drinking Water and/or Regional Water Quality Control Board staff may observe and document such activities; (5) Any public or media event publicizing the accomplishments and/or results of this Agreement and provide the opportunity for attendance and participation by state representatives with at least ten (10) working days’ notice to the Division; or (6) Work Completion, and Project Completion. 7. No Obligation of the State; State Budget Act Contingency. Any obligation of the State Water Board herein contained shall not be an obligation, debt, or liability of the State and any such obligation shall be payable solely out of the moneys appropriated by the State Legislature to the State Water Board from the special fund associated with this Agreement. If the Budget Act of the current year and/or any subsequent years covered under this Agreement does not appropriate sufficient funds for the program, this Agreement shall be of no force and effect. This provision shall be construed as a condition precedent to the obligation of the State Water Board to make any payments under this Agreement. In this event, the State shall have no liability to pay any funds whatsoever to Recipient or to furnish any other considerations under this Agreement and Recipient shall not be obligated to perform any provisions of this Agreement. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to provide the Recipient with a right of priority for payment over any other recipient. If this Agreement’s funding for any Fiscal Year is reduced or deleted by the Budget Act, by Executive Order, or by order of the Department of Finance, the State shall have the option to either cancel this Agreement with no liability occurring to the State, or offer an Agreement amendment to the Recipient to reflect the reduced amount. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1052 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed by the parties hereto. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT By: ____________________________________ Name: Julie Bueren Title: Chief Engineer Date:__________________________________ STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD: By: ____________________________________ Name: Leslie Laudon Title: Deputy Director Division of Financial Assistance Date: __________________________________ June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1053 EXHIBIT A – SCOPE OF WORK A-1. Completion Dates. The Work Completion Date is established as JUNE 30, 2019. Work occurring after the Work Completion Date, including corrective actions, is not eligible for reimbursement with Grant Funds and cannot be paid for using Match Funds. A-2. Purpose. This grant is for the benefit of the Recipient. This grant is for the purpose of preparing a Storm Water Resource Plan (SWRP) for Contra Costa County, that is compliant with the SWRP Guidelines adopted December 15, 2015, and the California Water Code Section 10561-10573, and for storm water resource planning to support the Green Infrastructure (GI) Program Plan development as required of entities permitted under the Municipal Regional Permit (MRP). The Recipient’s receipt of funding under this Agreement is not a commitment to and does not obligate the State Water Board to provide funding for any eventual construction/implementation project. A-3. Project-Specific Scope of Work. The Recipient agrees to do the following: 1. Project Management 1.1 Provide all technical and administrative services as needed for Project completion; monitor, supervise, and review all work performed; and coordinate budgeting and scheduling to ensure the Project is completed within budget, on schedule, and in accordance with approved procedures, applicable laws, and regulations. 1.2 Notify the Grant Manager at least fifteen (15) working days in advance of upcoming meetings, workshops, and trainings. 1.3 Provide and update appropriately a detailed Project schedule using a format provided, to include key Project milestones, and submit to the Grant Manager. 1.4 Conduct Project status review meetings as requested by the Grant Manager. 2. Technical Advisory Group (TAG) 2.1 Establish a TAG for the development of the SWRP that includes the State Water Board, Regional Water Board and interested parties such as municipalities, water suppliers, local agencies, non-governmental organizations, public utilities, and regulatory agencies. Submit the final list of TAG members, their roles and responsibilities, affiliations, to the Grant Manager. 2.2 Convene a kickoff meeting to develop the SWRP water management goals and objectives, formalize roles, and develop a schedule for future meetings. Submit a summary of SWRP objectives, meeting schedule and any updates to the TAG participant list to the Grant Manager in the associated quarterly progress report(s). 2.3 Conduct a minimum of four (4) meetings and submit the agendas, meeting notes, sign-in sheets, and a list of current action items for each meeting to the Grant Manager in the associated quarterly progress report(s). June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1054 3. Data Collection and Watershed Identification 3.1 Gather and review existing data appropriate to development of the SWRP including maps, geographic information system (GIS) data, analytical tools, related plans, permits, and additional storm water management information. Submit an annotated list of reviewed data and reports to the Grant Manager. 3.1.1 Identify mapping resources needed to create the GIS platform and identify priority mapping data gaps to be addressed in Task 5.1. Prepare a memo summarizing existing data resources, identifying digital map needs to create the GIS tools, and approaches to bridge the gaps necessary to support the GIS analysis and submit to the Grant Manager. 3.1.2 Review existing plans developed by stakeholders to generate a list of potential storm water management project concepts for inclusion in the SWRP. Plans to be reviewed include: Integrated Regional Water Management (IRWM) plans; creek restoration or watershed enhancement plans; MRP and Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL) compliance plans; municipal capital improvement plans (CIPs); and other watershed management and low impact development (LID) planning efforts. 3.2 Review and identify the SWRP watershed and sub-watersheds planning boundaries. The review shall include characterization of land use and natural or open space, public agency and water utility boundaries, surface and groundwater resources, and water quality priorities. Submit a SWRP planning area description, map, and justification of planning area boundaries to the Grant Manager for review and approval. 4. Storm Water Resource Plan Development 4.1 Develop and submit a detailed SWRP outline that demonstrates compliance with the SWRP Guidelines to the Grant Manager for review and approval. 4.2 Develop necessary components for a complete SWRP that achieves the recommendations set forth in the SWRP Guidelines and complies with the Water Code Sections 10561 - 10573. The SWRP shall include at a minimum, the following sections: Watershed Identification; Water Quality Compliance; Organization, Coordination, Collaboration; Quantitative Methods; Identification and Prioritization of Projects; Implementation Strategy and Schedule; Education, Outreach, and Public Participation. Submit update(s) on the development of each of the sections in the associated quarterly progress report(s). 4.3 Provide a description of the approach to address water quality requirements in the SWRP to the Grant Manager for approval. The description shall include consideration of the following: 4.3.1 Activities generating or contributing to polluted runoff or that impair beneficial use of storm water and dry weather runoff. 4.3.2 Strategies in which the SWRP will be used to address the pollutant runoff or sources, and how the SWRP will be consistent with and help to implement applicable regulatory permits, TMDL, and other relevant water quality requirements. 4.4 Develop quantitative methodologies for integrated identification, prioritization, and analysis of multiple benefit projects and programs to ensure the SWRP will achieve the water management objectives. The metrics-based analysis shall consider, at a minimum, opportunities to attain water quality improvements, storm water capture and use, water June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1055 supply, flood management, and environmental and community benefits using the following approaches: 4.4.1 Complete an evaluation of hydrologic/hydraulic models, water quality models, LID planning tools, including the GreenPlan-IT tool, and other GIS and spreadsheet-based decision support tools and models suitable to conduct the metrics-based benefit analysis and prioritization of projects, project implementation tracking, and to support the development of Green Infrastructure Plans (GI Plan) and associated reasonable assurance analyses (RAA) required by the MRP. 4.4.2 Prepare a technical memo describing the selected hydrologic/hydraulic modeling tools and quantitative methodologies that will be utilized and submit to the Grant Manager for review and approval. 4.4.3 Develop criteria and a scaled scoring system to screen public right-of-ways and publicly owned parcels for GI suitability and multiple benefits including community values. 4.4.4 Prepare a technical memorandum describing the screening process to identify rights- of-way and parcels with characteristics that are appropriate for implementation of GI projects and the scaled scoring system to prioritize project opportunities using the multiple benefits metrics. Submit the technical memorandum to the Grant Manager for review. 4.5 Complete the analysis, prioritization process and project(s) selection using the approaches identified in Item 4.4 and submit the results to the Grant Manager. At a minimum, the steps shall include: 4.5.1 Identify potential opportunities and multi-benefit storm water projects that augment water supply, water quality, flood protection, environmental benefits, and other community benefits within the watershed using the developed approach. 4.5.2 Evaluate multi-benefit projects and develop a list of prioritized projects using the developed approach. 4.6 Select a minimum of ten (10) high priority projects evaluated in Item 4.5.2, and prepare GI Best Management Practices (BMPs) Project concept plans showing the project footprint, storm water treatment facilities, and cost estimates for each selected project. Submit the BMP Project concept plans to the TAG and Grant Manager. 4.7 Develop an implementation strategy for the SWRP that includes stakeholder involvement, performance-measures, development of decision support tools, monitoring, and an adaptive management approach. 4.7.1 Identify monitoring and data requirements to support implementation of the SWRP. 4.7.2 Develop data collection, storage, and management protocols that include mechanisms to make the data available to stakeholders, assess monitoring programs and data quality control, update data, and fill data gaps. 4.7.3 Prepare a technical memo of the draft implementation strategy and submit to the Grant Manager for review and approval. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1056 4.8 Submit an administrative draft SWRP and draft SWRP Guidelines Appendix A checklist and self-certification (self-certification checklist) to the TAG and the Grant Manager for review and comment. 4.9 Address all comments received on the administrative draft SWRP and prepare a public draft SWRP. Submit the public draft SWRP to the Grant Manager. 4.10 Post the public draft SWRP online and solicit comments from the public, the local IRWM group, and interested stakeholders. Submit a summary of the comments received to the Grant Manager. 4.11 Address all applicable public comments and prepare a final draft SWRP. Submit the final draft SWRP to the TAG and Grant Manager for review and approval. 4.12 Prepare the final SWRP and submit with the signed self-certification checklist to the TAG, local IRWM group, and the Grant Manager. 5. Digital Maps and GIS-based Tool Development 5.1 Consolidate and digitize data to address the mapping need identified in Task 3.1.1. Submit the resultant GIS layer(s) to the Grant Manager 5.2 Develop and publish a GIS-based web mapping application available to authorized users that employs tools to screen and prioritize potential public parcels for multi-benefit storm water projects. Conduct a demonstration of the GIS platform over a webconference link for the Grant Manager. 6. Stakeholder Outreach, Education, and Public Participation 6.1 Facilitate the organization, coordination, and collaboration among stakeholders and provide opportunities for general public participation and education throughout development of the SWRP. 6.1.1 Prepare a stakeholder outreach, education, and engagement plan and submit to the Grant Manager for review and approval. 6.1.2 Implement the stakeholder/public outreach, education, and engagement plan. At a minimum, conduct the following outreach events to engage stakeholders in the SWRP development: 6.1.2.1 Conduct a minimum of one (1) project initiation meeting at the Contra Costa Watershed Forum and seek input from watershed stakeholders and the public. 6.1.2.2 Conduct a minimum of six (6) additional stakeholder/public outreach events in the watershed planning units to engage stakeholders in the SWRP development and identification of projects. Target outreach events for key points in the development of the SWRP as identified in the engagement plan. 6.2 Prepare and submit a summary of stakeholder outreach, education, public participation, and collaboration activities including meeting agenda(s) and materials, meeting summaries, sign-in sheets, and photos in the associated quarterly progress report(s). June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1057 6.3 Prepare and submit a summary of the stakeholder outreach work conducted by American Rivers in the Marsh Creek, San Pablo, Rheem, and Wildcat Creek Watersheds, including lists of the multi-benefit stormwater management projects identified through the engagement process, to the Grant Manager. 7. GI Program Plan Development 7.1 Prepare a guidance document to assist municipal staff in incorporation of SWRP technical resources and outputs into their GI Plans. Conduct up to four (4) meetings to assist the Contra Costa Clean Water Program in incorporating SWRP technical resources and outputs into the development of the RAA. Submit the guidance document and meeting summaries to the Grant Manager. A-4. Disclosure. The Recipient shall include the following disclosure statement in any document, written report, or brochure prepared in whole or in part pursuant to this Agreement: “Funding has been provided in full or in part through an agreement with the State Water Resources Control Board using funds from Proposition 1. The contents of this document do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the foregoing, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.” A-5. Reporting. (a) Progress Reports. The Recipient shall submit quarterly progress reports to the Grant Manager within forty-five (45) days following the end of the calendar quarter (March, June, September, and December). Progress Reports shall provide a brief description of activities that have occurred, milestones achieved, monitoring results (if applicable), and any problems encountered in the performance of the work under this Agreement during the applicable reporting period. Reporting shall be required even if no grant related activities occurred during the reporting period. The Recipient shall document all activities and expenditures in progress reports, including work performed by contractors. (b) As Needed Information or Reports. The Recipient agrees to provide expeditiously, during the term of this Agreement, such reports, data, and information as may be reasonably required by the Division, including but not limited to material necessary or appropriate for evaluation of the funding program or to fulfill any reporting requirements of the state or federal government. (c) Annual Progress Summaries. The Recipient shall prepare and provide an Annual Progress Summary annually by November 15 that covers the time period from October 1 of the previous year through September 30 of the current year. The summary must be no more than two (2) pages, and shall include pictures as appropriate. The Recipient shall upload an electronic copy of the Annual Progress Summary in pdf format to the Financial Assistance Application Submittal Tool (FAAST) system. The summary shall include the following: (1) A summary of the conditions the Project is meant to alleviate, the Project’s objective, the scope of the Project, and a description of the approach used to achieve the Project objective. (2) A summary of the progress made to date, significant milestones achieved, and the current schedule of completing the Project. (d) Final Reports. At the conclusion of the Project, the Recipient must submit the following to the Grant Manager: June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1058 (1) Final Project Summary. Prepare and submit a Final Project Summary in a format provided by the Grant Manager, which includes accomplishments, recommendations, and lessons learned, as appropriate. Upload an electronic copy of the Final Project Summary in pdf format to the FAAST system . June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1059 A-6. Project Schedule. Failure to provide items by the due dates indicated in the Project Schedule below may constitute a material violation of this agreement. However, the dates in the “Estimated Due Date” column of this Project Schedule may be adjusted as necessary during the Disbursement Period with Grant Manager approval. All work or submittals must be achieved with relevant submittals approved by the Division prior to the Work Completion Date, and the final Disbursement Request submitted, prior to the Final Disbursement Request Date set forth in Exhibit B. ITEM DESCRIPTION OF SUBMITTAL CRITICAL DUE DATE ESTIMATED DUE DATE EXHIBIT A-3 PROJECT-SPECIFIC SCOPE OF WORK 1. Project Management 1.2 Notification of Upcoming Meetings, Workshops, and Trainings Ongoing 1.3 Detailed Project Schedule 30 Days After Execution 1.4 Status Review Meetings with the Grant Manager As Needed 2. Technical Advisory Group (TAG) 2.1 List of TAG Members, Roles and Responsibilities, and Affiliations April 2017 2.2 TAG Kickoff Meeting Summary Quarterly 2.3 TAG Meeting Agenda, Notes, Sign-In Sheets, and Action Items Quarterly 3. Data Collection and Watershed Identification 3.1 Annotated List of Data and Reports May 2017 3.1.1 Memo of Existing Map Resources and Needs May 2017 3.2 Planning Area Description, Map and Boundaries June 2017 4. Storm Water Resource Plan Development 4.1 Detailed SWRP Outline July 31, 2017 4.3 Description of Approach Addressing Water Quality July 2017 4.4.2 Technical Memo on Modeling Tools and Methodologies July 2017 4.4.4 Technical Memo Describing Screening Process October 2017 4.5 Results of Analysis, Prioritization and Project(s) Selection January 2018 4.6 GI BMP Project Concept Plans May 2018 4.7.3 Technical Memo of Draft Implementation Strategy February 2018 4.8 Administrative Draft SWRP and Draft Self- Certification Checklist July 31, 2018 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1060 ITEM DESCRIPTION OF SUBMITTAL CRITICAL DUE DATE ESTIMATED DUE DATE EXHIBIT A-3 PROJECT-SPECIFIC SCOPE OF WORK 4.9 Public Draft SWRP July 2018 4.10 Summary of Comments October 2018 4.11 Final Draft SWRP November 2018 4.12 Final SWRP and Signed Self-Certification Checklist January 31, 2019 5. Digital Maps and Online GIS-based Tool Development 5.1 GIS Layers January 2019 5.2 GIS Mapping Demonstration January 2019 6. Stakeholder Outreach, Education, and Public Participation 6.1.1 Stakeholder/Public Engagement Plan June 2017 6.2 Summary of Stakeholder Activities Quarterly 6.3 Summary of American Rivers Outreach Activities June 2017 7. GI Program Plan Development 7.1 Guidance Document and Meeting Summaries February 2019 EXHIBIT A-5 REPORTING (a) Progress Reports Quarterly (b) As Needed Information or Reports (c) Annual Progress Summaries Annually by 11/15 (d)(1) Final Project Summary April 30, 2019 EXHIBIT B – FUNDING PROVISIONS 4 (b) Final Disbursement Request July 31, 2019 9 (b)(4) Disbursement Requests Quarterly June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1061 EXHIBIT B – FUNDING PROVISIONS B-1. Project Funding. Subject to the terms of this Agreement, the State Water Board agrees to provide Grant Funds in the amount of up to FOUR HUNDRED NINETY-NINE THOUSAND, ONE HUNDRED EIGHTY DOLLARS ($499,180). B-2. Match Funds. (a) The Recipient agrees to provide Match Funds in the amount of FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND, SEVEN HUNDRED SIXTY DOLLARS ($500,760). (b) This Match Funds amount is based on the budget, funding sources, and amounts submitted by the Recipient in its application and during the negotiation of this Agreement. Any Match Funds changes or adjustments requested by the Recipient must be approved, in advance and in writing, by the Grant Manager and may require an amendment to this Agreement. (c) Only expenses that would be considered eligible under Prop 1 and the Guidelines will be counted towards the Recipient’s Match Funds. (d) Any costs incurred prior to the adoption of Prop 1 on November 4, 2014, will not count towards the Recipient’s Match Funds. (e) If, at Work Completion, the Recipient has provided Match Funds in an amount that is less than the Match Funds amount set forth above, the State Water Board may proportionately reduce the Grant Funds amount and/or Recipient’s Match Funds amount, upon approval of the Deputy Director of the Division, provided the reduced amount(s) satisfy statutory requirements and Guidelines. B-3. Estimated Reasonable Total Project Cost. The estimated reasonable cost of the total Project is NINE HUNDRED NINETY-NINE THOUSAND, NINE HUNDRED FORTY DOLLARS ($999,940). B-4. Funding Dates. (a) The Eligible Start Date is [Date]. Otherwise eligible costs incurred prior to this date will not be reimbursed. (b) The Final Disbursement Request Date is JULY 31, 2019. The Deputy Director of the Division may extend this date for good cause. Extensions may require an amendment to this Agreement. All disbursement requests must be submitted to the Division such that they are received prior to this date. Late disbursement requests will not be honored and remaining amounts will be deobligated. B-5. Funding Conditions and Exclusions. (a) This Agreement reflects planning funding only. If the Recipient desires implementation/construction funding, the Recipient must apply for implementation/construction funding, and execute an implementation/construction funding agreement. Costs associated with the implementation/construction phase of the possible eventual implementation/construction project are not eligible for reimbursement under this Agreement. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1062 (b) The State Water Board’s disbursement of funds hereunder is contingent on the Recipient’s compliance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. (c) Grant Funds may not be used for any Indirect Costs. Any Disbursement Request submitted including Indirect Costs will cause that Disbursement Request, in its entirety, to be disputed and will not be paid until the dispute is resolved. This prohibition applies to the Recipient and any subcontract or sub-agreement for work on the Project that will be reimbursed with Grant Funds pursuant to this Agreement. (Gov. Code, § 16727.) B-6. Budget Summary. LINE ITEM GRANT FUNDS MATCH FUNDS TOTAL PROJECT COSTS Direct Project Administrative Costs $73,600 $36,800 $110,400 Planning/Design/Engineering/Environmental $359,540 $278,780 $638,320 Construction/Implementation $0 $0 $0 Monitoring/Performance $0 $0 $0 Education/Outreach $66,040 $174,780 $240,820 TOTAL $499,180 $500,760 $999,940 B-7. Budget Flexibility. (a) Subject to the prior review and approval of the Grant Manager, adjustments between existing line item(s) may be used to defray allowable direct costs up to fifteen percent (15%) of the total amount (excluding Match Funds), including any amendment(s) thereto. Line item adjustments in excess of fifteen percent (15%) require an Agreement amendment. If the detailed budget includes an amount for the Recipient’s personnel costs, that amount is based on the hours, classifications, and rates submitted by the Recipient in its application. Any changes to the hours, classifications, and rates must be approved, in advance and in writing, by the Grant Manager. (b) The Recipient may submit a request for an adjustment in writing to the Grant Manager. Such adjustment may not increase or decrease the total grant amount. The Recipient shall submit a copy of the original Agreement Budget sheet reflecting the requested changes and shall note proposed changes by striking out the original amount(s) followed with proposed change(s) in bold and underlined. Budget adjustments deleting a budget line item or adding a new budget line item shall require a formal amendment. The Division may also propose budget adjustments. (c) The sum of adjusted line items shall not exceed the total budget amount. B-8. Amounts Payable by the Recipient. The Recipient agrees to pay any and all costs connected with the Project including, without limitation, any and all Project Costs. If the Grant Funds are not sufficient to pay the Project Costs in full, the Recipient shall nonetheless complete the Project and pay that portion of the Project Costs in excess of available Grant Funds, and shall not be entitled to any reimbursement therefor from the State Water Board. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1063 B-9. Disbursement of Grant Funds; Availability of Grant Funds. (a) The State Water Board's obligation to disburse Grant Funds is contingent upon the availability of sufficient funds to permit the disbursements provided for herein. If sufficient funds are not available for any reason, including but not limited to failure of the State government to appropriate funds necessary for disbursement of Grant Funds, the State Water Board shall not be obligated to make any disbursements to the Recipient under this Agreement. This provision shall be construed as a condition precedent to the obligation of the State Water Board to make any disbursements under this Agreement. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to provide the Recipient with a right of priority for disbursement over any other recipient. If any disbursements due the Recipient under this Agreement are deferred because sufficient funds are unavailable, it is the intention of the State Water Board that such disbursement will be made to the Recipient when sufficient funds do become available, but this intention is not binding. If this Agreement’s funding for any fiscal year is reduced or deleted by the Budget Act, by Executive Order, or by order of the Department of Finance, the State shall have the option to either cancel this Agreement with no liability occurring to the State, or offer an amendment to the Recipient to reflect the reduced amount. (b) Except as may be otherwise provided in this Agreement, disbursement of Grant Funds will be made as follows: (1) Upon execution and delivery of this Agreement, the Recipient may submit a Disbursement Request for eligible Project Costs as well as to support Match Funds specified in this Exhibit from the Project Costs through submission to the State Water Board using the Disbursement Request form provided by the Grant Manager. (2) Disbursement Requests shall contain the following information: a. The date of the request; b. The time period covered by the request, i.e., the term “from” and “to”; c. The total amount requested; d. Documentation of match; e. Original signature and date (in ink) of Recipient’s Authorized Representative; and, f. The Final Disbursement Request shall be clearly marked “FINAL DISBURSEMENT REQUEST” and shall be submitted NO LATER THAN JULY 31, 2019. (3) Disbursement Requests must be itemized based on the line items specified in the budget in this Exhibit. Disbursement Requests must be signed by the Authorized Representative or designee and must be addressed to the Grant Manager as set forth in the Party Contacts section of this Agreement. Requests for disbursement submitted in any other format than the one provided by the State Water Board will cause a Disbursement Request to be disputed. In the event of such a dispute, the Grant Manager will notify the Recipient. Payment will not be made until the dispute is resolved and a corrected Disbursement Request submitted. The Grant Manager has the responsibility for approving Disbursement Requests. Disbursement Requests must be complete and executed by the Recipient. Project Costs incurred prior to the Eligible Start Date of this Agreement will not be reimbursed. (4) Grant Funds must be requested via Disbursement Request quarterly for eligible costs incurred during the reporting period of the corresponding Progress Report, describing the June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1064 activities and expenditures for which the disbursement is being requested. Each Disbursement Request must be accompanied by a Progress Report. Failure to provide timely Disbursement Requests may result in such requests not being honored. (5) The Recipient agrees that it will not submit any Disbursement Requests that include any Project Costs until such costs have been incurred and are currently due and payable by the Recipient, although the actual payment of such costs by the Recipient is not required as a condition of Disbursement Request. Supporting documentation (e.g., receipts) must be submitted with each Disbursement Request as well as to support Match Funds claimed, if any. The amount requested for administration costs must include a calculation formula (i.e., hours or days worked times the hourly or daily rate = total amount claimed). Disbursement of Grant Funds will be made only after receipt of a complete, adequately supported, properly documented, and accurately addressed Disbursement Request. (6) The Recipient will not seek reimbursement of any Project Costs that have been reimbursed from other funding sources. (7) Recipient shall use Grant Funds within 30 days of receipt to reimburse contractors, vendors, and other Project Costs. Any interest earned on Grant Funds shall be reported to the State Water Board and will either be required to be returned to the State Water Board or deducted from future disbursements. In the event that the Recipient fails to disburse Grant Funds to contractors or vendors within thirty (30) days from receipt of the funds, the Recipient shall immediately return such funds to the State Water Board. Interest shall accrue on such funds from the date of disbursement through the date of mailing of funds to the State Water Board. If the Recipient held such funds in interest-bearing accounts, any interest earned on the funds shall also be due to the State Water Board. (8) Recipient shall submit its final Disbursement Request no later than the Final Disbursement Request Date specified herein unless prior approval is granted by the Division. If the Recipient fails to do so, then the undisbursed balance of this Agreement will be deobligated. (9) The Recipient agrees that it will not request a disbursement unless that cost is allowable, reasonable, and allocable. (10) Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, no disbursement shall be required at any time or in any manner that is in violation of or in conflict with federal or state laws, policies, or regulations. (11) The Recipient agrees that it shall not be entitled to interest earned on undisbursed Grant Funds. (12) Any reimbursement for necessary travel and per diem shall be at rates not to exceed those set by the California Department of Human Resources. These rates may be found at http://www.calhr.ca.gov/employees/Pages/travel-reimbursements.aspx. Reimbursement will be at the State travel and per diem amounts that are current as of the date costs are incurred by the Recipient. No travel outside the State of California shall be reimbursed unless prior written authorization is obtained from the Grant Manager. (13) The Recipient must include any other documents or requests required or allowed under this Agreement. B-10. Withholding of Disbursements and Material Violations. (a) Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, the Recipient agrees that the State Water Board may retain an amount equal to ten percent (10%) of the Grant Funds until Project June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1065 Completion. Any retained amounts due to the Recipient will be promptly disbursed to the Recipient, without interest, upon Project Completion. (b) The State Water Board may withhold all or any portion of the funds provided for by this Agreement in the event that: (1) The Recipient has materially violated, or threatens to materially violate, any term, provision, condition, or commitment of this Agreement; or (2) The Recipient fails to maintain reasonable progress toward Project Completion. B-11. Remaining Balance. In the event the Recipient does not request all of the funds encumbered under this Agreement, any remaining funds revert to the State. B-12. Fraud and Misuse of Public Funds. All requests for disbursement submitted shall be accurate and signed under penalty of perjury. Any and all costs submitted pursuant to this Agreement shall only be for the tasks set forth herein. The Recipient shall not submit any Disbursement Request containing costs that are ineligible or have been reimbursed from other funding sources unless required and specifically noted as such (i.e., match costs). Any eligible costs for which the Recipient is seeking reimbursement shall not be reimbursed from any other source. Double or multiple billing for time, services, or any other eligible cost is illegal and constitutes fraud. Any suspected occurrences of fraud, forgery, embezzlement, theft, or any other misuse of public funds may result in suspension of disbursements of Grant Funds and/or termination of this Agreement requiring the repayment of all funds disbursed hereunder. Additionally, the Deputy Director of the Division may request an audit and refer the matter to the Attorney General’s Office or the appropriate district attorney’s office for criminal prosecution or the imposition of civil liability. (Civ. Code, §§ 1572-1573; Pen. Code, §§ 470, 489-490.) June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1066 EXHIBIT C – STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS C-1. Accounting and Auditing Standards. The Recipient must maintain Project accounts according to GAAP. The Recipient shall maintain GAAP- compliant Project accounts, including GAAP requirements relating to the reporting of infrastructure assets. C-2. Amendment. No amendment or variation of the terms of this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing, signed by the parties and approved as required. No oral or written understanding or agreement not incorporated in this Agreement is binding on any of the parties. C-3. Assignability. This Agreement is not assignable by the Recipient, either in whole or in part. C-4. Audit. (a) The Division, at its option, may call for an audit of financial information relative to the Project, where the Division determines that an audit is desirable to assure program integrity or where such an audit becomes necessary because of state or federal requirements. Where such an audit is called for, the audit shall be performed by a certified public accountant independent of the Recipient and at the cost of the Recipient. The audit shall be in the form required by the Division. (b) Audit disallowances will be returned to the State Water Board. Failure to comply with audit disallowance provisions shall disqualify the Recipient from participating in State Water Board funding programs. C-5. [Reserved] C-6. [Reserved] C-7. Claims. Any claim of the Recipient is limited to the rights, remedies, and claims procedures provided to the Recipient under this Agreement. C-8. Competitive Bidding. Recipient shall adhere to any applicable state or local ordinance for competitive bidding and applicable labor laws. If Recipient is a private entity, any construction contracts related in any way to the Project shall be let by competitive bid procedures that ensure award of such contracts to the lowest responsible bidders. Recipient shall not award a construction contract until a summary of bids and identification of the selected lowest responsible bidder is submitted to and approved in writing by the Division. Recipient must provide a full explanation if Recipient is proposing to award a construction contract to anyone other than the lowest responsible bidder. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1067 C-9. Compliance with Law, Regulations, etc. The Recipient agrees that it will, at all times, comply with and require its contractor and subcontractors to comply with all applicable federal and state laws, rules, guidelines, regulations, and requirements. Without limitation of the foregoing, the Recipient agrees that, to the extent applicable, the Recipient will: (a) Comply with the Guidelines; (b) Comply with and require compliance with the list of state laws (cross-cutters) in Section C-32 of this Agreement. C-10. Conflict of Interest. The Recipient certifies that its owners, officers, directors, agents, representatives, and employees are in compliance, and shall remain compliant through Project Completion, with applicable state and federal conflict of interest laws, including but not limited to laws related to conflict of interest laws related to contracting and procurement. C-11. Damages for Breach Affecting Tax-Exempt Status or Federal Compliance. In the event that any breach of any of the provisions of this Agreement by the Recipient shall result in the loss of tax-exempt status for any bonds of the State or any subdivision or agency thereof, including bonds issued on behalf of the State Water Board, or if such breach shall result in an obligation on the part of the State or any subdivision or agency thereof to reimburse the federal government by reason of any arbitrage profits, the Recipient shall immediately reimburse the State or any subdivision or agency thereof in an amount equal to any damages paid by or loss incurred by the State or any subdivision or agency thereof due to such breach. In the event that any breach of any of the provisions of this Agreement by the Recipient shall result in the failure of Grant Funds to be used pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement, or if such breach shall result in an obligation on the part of the State or any subdivision or agency thereof to reimburse the federal government, the Recipient shall immediately reimburse the State or any subdivision or agency thereof in an amount equal to any damages paid by or loss incurred by the State or any subdivision or agency thereof due to such breach. C-12. Disputes. (a) The Recipient may appeal a staff decision within 30 days to the Deputy Director of the Division or designee, for a final Division decision. The Recipient may appeal a final Division decision to the State Water Board within 30 days. The Office of the Chief Counsel of the State Water Board will prepare a summary of the dispute and make recommendations relative to its final resolution, which will be provided to the State Water Board’s Executive Director and each State Water Board Member. Upon the motion of any State Water Board Member, the State Water Board will review and resolve the dispute in the manner determined by the State Water Board. Should the State Water Board determine not to review the final Division decision, this decision will represent a final agency action on the dispute. (b) This clause does not preclude consideration of legal questions, provided that nothing herein shall be construed to make final the decision of the State Water Board, or any official or representative thereof, on any question of law. (c) Recipient shall continue with the responsibilities under this Agreement during any dispute. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1068 C-13. Financial Management System and Standards. The Recipient agrees to comply with federal standards for financial management systems. The Recipient agrees that, at a minimum, its fiscal control and accounting procedures will be sufficient to permit preparation of reports required by the federal or state government and tracking of Project Costs to a level of expenditure adequate to establish that such funds have not been used in violation of federal or state law or the terms of this Agreement. C-14. Governing Law. This Agreement is governed by and shall be interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California. C-15. Income Restrictions. The Recipient agrees that any refunds, rebates, credits, or other amounts (including any interest thereon) accruing to or received by the Recipient under this Agreement shall be paid by the Recipient to the State, to the extent that they are properly allocable to costs for which the Recipient has been reimbursed by the State under this Agreement. C-16. Indemnification and State Reviews. The parties agree that review or approval of Project documents by the State Water Board is for administrative purposes only, including conformity with application and eligibility criteria, and expressly not for the purposes of design defect review or construction feasibility, and does not relieve the Recipient of its responsibility to engage in proper planning. To the extent permitted by law, the Recipient agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the State Water Board, and its officers, employees, and agents (collectively, "Indemnified Persons"), against any loss or liability arising out of any claim or action brought against any Indemnified Persons from and against any and all losses, claims, damages, liabilities, or expenses, of every conceivable kind, character, and nature whatsoever arising out of, resulting from, or in any way connected with (1) the Project or the conditions, occupancy, use, possession, conduct, or management of, work done in or about, or the planning, design, acquisition, installation, or construction, of the Project or any part thereof; (2) the carrying out of any of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement or any related document; (3) any violation of any applicable law, rule or regulation, any environmental law (including, without limitation, the Federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, the California Hazardous Substance Account Act, the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, the Clean Air Act, the Toxic Substances Control Act, the Occupational Safety and Health Act, the Safe Drinking Water Act, the California Hazardous Waste Control Law, and California Water Code Section 13304, and any successors to said laws), rule or regulation or the release of any toxic substance on or near the Project; or (4) any untrue statement or alleged untrue statement of any material fact or omission or alleged omission to state a material fact necessary to make the statements required to be stated therein, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading with respect to any information provided by the Recipient for use in any disclosure document utilized in connection with any of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. To the fullest extent permitted by law, the Recipient agrees to pay and discharge any judgment or award entered or made against Indemnified Persons with respect to any such claim or action, and any settlement, compromise or other voluntary resolution. The provisions of this section shall survive the term of this Agreement and the discharge of the Recipient's Obligation hereunder. C-17. Independent Actor. The Recipient, and its agents and employees, if any, in the performance of this Agreement, shall act in an independent capacity and not as officers, employees, or agents of the State Water Board. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1069 C-18. Integration. This Agreement is the complete and final Agreement between the parties. C-19. Non-Discrimination Clause. (a) During the performance of this Agreement, Recipient and its contractors and subcontractors shall not unlawfully discriminate, harass, or allow harassment against any employee or applicant for employment because of sex, race, color, ancestry, religious creed, national origin, sexual orientation, physical disability (including HIV and AIDS), mental disability, medical condition (cancer), age (over 40), marital status, denial of family care leave, or genetic information, gender, gender identity, gender expression, or military and veteran status. (b) The Recipient, its contractors, and subcontractors shall ensure that the evaluation and treatment of their employees and applicants for employment are free from such discrimination and harassment. (c) The Recipient, its contractors, and subcontractors shall comply with the provisions of the Fair Employment and Housing Act and the applicable regulations promulgated thereunder. (Gov. Code, §12990, subds. (a)-(f) et seq.; Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, § 7285 et seq.) Such regulations are incorporated into this Agreement by reference and made a part hereof as if set forth in full. (d) The Recipient, its contractors, and subcontractors shall give written notice of their obligations under this clause to labor organizations with which they have a collective bargaining or other agreement. (e) The Recipient shall include the nondiscrimination and compliance provisions of this clause in all subcontracts to perform work under the Agreement. C-20. No Third Party Rights. The parties to this Agreement do not create rights in, or grant remedies to, any third party as a beneficiary of this Agreement, or of any duty, covenant, obligation, or undertaking established herein. C-21. [Reserved] C-22. Other Assistance. If funding for Project Costs is made available to the Recipient from sources other than this Agreement and approved match sources, the Recipient shall immediately notify the Grant Manager. C-23. Permits, Contracting, Disqualification. The Recipient shall comply in all material respects with all applicable federal, state and local laws, rules and regulations. Recipient shall procure all permits, licenses and other authorizations necessary to accomplish the work contemplated in this Agreement, pay all charges and fees, and give all notices necessary and incidental to the due and lawful prosecution of the work. For any work related to this Agreement, the Recipient shall not contract with any individual or organization on the State Water Board’s List of Disqualified Businesses and Persons that is identified as debarred or suspended or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in any work overseen, directed, funded, or administered by the State Water Board program for which funding under this Agreement is authorized. The State Water Board’s List of Disqualified Businesses and Persons is located at http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/ustcf/dbp.shtml. The Recipient shall not June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1070 contract with any party who is debarred or suspended or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs under Executive Order 12549, “Debarment and Suspension.” C-24. Public Records. The Recipient acknowledges that, except for a subset of information regarding archaeological records, the Project records and locations are public records, including but not limited to all of the submissions accompanying the application, all of the documents incorporated by reference into this Agreement, and all reports, disbursement requests, and supporting documentation submitted hereunder. C-25. Prevailing Wages. The Recipient agrees to be bound by all applicable provisions of State Labor Code regarding prevailing wages. The Recipient shall monitor all agreements subject to reimbursement from this Agreement to ensure that the prevailing wage provisions of the State Labor Code are being met. C-26. Professionals. The Recipient agrees that only professionals with valid licenses in the State of California will be used to perform services under this Agreement where such services are called for. All technical reports required pursuant to this Agreement that involve planning, investigation, evaluation, design, or other work requiring interpretation and proper application of engineering, architecture, or geologic sciences shall be prepared by or under the direction of persons registered to practice in California. All technical reports must contain the statement of the qualifications of the responsible registered professional(s). Technical reports must bear the signature(s) and seal(s) of the registered professional(s) in a manner such that all work can be clearly attributed to the professional responsible for the work. C-27. Public Funding. This Project is publicly funded. Any service provider or contractor with which the Recipient contracts must not have any role or relationship with the Recipient, that, in effect, substantially limits the Recipient's ability to exercise its rights, including cancellation rights, under the contract, based on all the facts and circumstances. C-28. Recipient’s Responsibility for Work. The Recipient shall be responsible for all work and for persons or entities engaged in work performed pursuant to this Agreement, including, but not limited to, contractors, subcontractors, suppliers, and providers of services. The Recipient shall be responsible for any and all disputes arising out of its contracts for work on the Project. The State Water Board will not mediate disputes between the Recipient and any other entity concerning responsibility for performance of work. C-29. Records. Without limitation of the requirement to maintain Project accounts in accordance with GAAP, the Recipient agrees to: (a) Establish an official file for the Project which shall adequately document all significant actions relative to the Project. (b) Establish separate accounts which will adequately and accurately depict all amounts received and expended on the Project, including all assistance funds received under this Agreement. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1071 (c) Establish separate accounts which will adequately depict all income received which is attributable to the Project, specifically including any income attributable to assistance funds disbursed under this Agreement. (d) Establish an accounting system which will accurately depict final total costs of the Project, including both direct and indirect costs. Indirect Costs are not eligible for funding under this Agreement. (e) Establish such accounts and maintain such records as may be necessary for the State to fulfill federal reporting requirements, including any and all reporting requirements under federal tax statutes or regulations. (f) If Force Account is used by the Recipient for the Project, accounts will be established which reasonably document all employee hours charged to the Project and the associated tasks performed by each employee. (g) Maintain separate books, records and other material relative to the Project. (h) Retain such books, records, and other material for itself and for each contractor or subcontractor who performed work on this Project for a minimum of thirty-six (36) years after Work Completion. The Recipient shall require that such books, records, and other material be subject at all reasonable times (at a minimum during normal business hours) to inspection, copying, and audit by the State Water Board, the Bureau of State Audits, the Internal Revenue Service, the Governor, or any authorized representatives of the aforementioned, and shall allow interviews during normal business hours of any employees who might reasonably have information related to such records. The Recipient agrees to include a similar right regarding audit, interviews, and records retention in any subcontract related to the performance of this Agreement. The provisions of this section shall survive the term of this Agreement. C-30. Related Litigation. A Recipient is prohibited from using Grant Funds or Match Funds to pay costs associated with any litigation the Recipient pursues. Regardless of whether the Project or any eventual construction project is the subject of litigation, the Recipient agrees to complete the Project funded by the Agreement or to repay all Grant Funds plus interest to the State Water Board. C-31. Rights in Data. The Recipient agrees that all data, plans, drawings, specifications, reports, computer programs, operating manuals, notes, and other written or graphic work produced in the performance of this Agreement are subject to the rights of the State as set forth in this section. The State shall have the right to reproduce, publish, and use all such work, or any part thereof, in any manner and for any purposes whatsoever and to authorize others to do so. If any such work is copyrightable, the Recipient may copyright the same, except that, as to any work which is copyrighted by the Recipient, the State reserves a royalty-free, nonexclusive, and irrevocable license to reproduce, publish, and use such work, or any part thereof, and to authorize others to do so, and to receive electronic copies from the Recipient upon request. C-32. State Cross-Cutter Compliance. Recipient represents and certifies that, to the extent applicable, it is in compliance with the following conditions precedent and agrees that it will continue to maintain compliance during the term of this Agreement: June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1072 (a) Agricultural Water Management Plan Consistency. A Recipient that is an agricultural water supplier as defined by section 10608.12 of the Water Code must comply with the Agricultural Water Management Planning Act. (Wat. Code, § 10800 et seq.) (b) California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Implementation and construction activities must comply with CEQA and potentially other environmental review requirements, including the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Proceeding with work subject to CEQA and/or NEPA without environmental clearance by the State Water Board shall constitute a breach of a material provision of this Agreement. (c) Charter City Project Labor Requirements. (Labor Code, § 1782 and Pub. Contract Code, § 2503.) (1) Prevailing Wage Where Recipient is a charter city or a joint powers authority that includes a charter city, Recipient certifies that no charter provision nor ordinance authorizes a construction project contractor not to comply with Labor Code’s prevailing wage rate requirements, nor, within the prior two years (starting from January 1, 2015 or after) has the city awarded a public works contract without requiring the contractor to comply with such wage rate requirements according to Labor Code section 1782. (2) Labor Agreements Where Recipient is a charter city or a joint powers authority that includes a charter city, Recipient certifies that no charter provision, initiative, or ordinance limits or constrains the city’s authority or discretion to adopt, require, or utilize project labor agreements that include all the taxpayer protection antidiscrimination provisions of Public Contract Code section 2500 in construction projects, and that Recipient is accordingly eligible for state funding or financial assistance pursuant to Public Contract Code section 2503. (d) Contractor and Subcontractor Requirements. (Labor Code, §§ 1725.5 and 1771.1.) To bid for public works contracts, Recipient acknowledges that Recipient and Recipient’s subcontractors must register with the Department of Industrial Relations. (e) Delta Plan Consistency Findings. (Wat. Code, § 85225 and Cal. Code of Regulations, title 23, § 5002.) If Recipient is a state or local public agency and the proposed action is covered by the Delta Plan, Recipient will submit a certification of project consistency with the Delta Plan to the Delta Stewardship Council prior to undertaking the implementation/construction project associated with this Project. (f) Eminent Domain Prohibited. (Wat. Code, § 79711.) Where land acquisition is otherwise authorized under this Agreement, Grant Funds and Match Funds shall not be used to acquire land via eminent domain. (g) Governor’s Infrastructure Plan. (Gov. Code, § 13100.) The Recipient shall ensure that the Project shall maintain consistency with section 13100 of the Government Code (five year infrastructure plan). (h) State Water Board’s Drought Emergency Water Conservation regulations. (Cal. Code of Regulations, Title 23, article 22.5.) The Recipient will include a discussion of its implementation in Progress Reports submitted pursuant to this Agreement. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1073 (i) Urban Water Demand Management. (Wat. Code, § 10631.5.) If Recipient is an “urban water supplier” as defined by Water Code section 10617, Recipient certifies that it is implementing water demand management measures approved by the Department of Water Resources. (j) Urban Water Management Planning Act. (Wat. Code, § 10610 et seq.). If Recipient is an “urban water supplier” as defined by Water Code section 10617, the Recipient certifies that it has submitted an Urban Water Management Plan that has been deemed complete by the Department of Water Resources and is in compliance with that plan. This shall constitute a condition precedent to this Agreement. (k) Urban Water Supplier. (Wat. Code, §§ 526 and 527.) If Recipient is an urban water supplier as defined by Water Code section 10617, it shall have complied and maintain compliance with sections 526 and 527 of the Water Code relating to installation of meters and volumetric charging. (l) Water Diverter. (Wat. Code, § 5103.) If Recipient is a water diverter, Recipient must maintain compliance by submitting monthly diversion reports to the Division of Water Rights of the State Water Resources Control Board. (m) Water Quality Compliance. (Wat. Code, § 79707.) The Recipient shall ensure that the Project shall maintain consistency with Division 7 of the Water Code (commencing with section 13000) and Government Code section 13100. (n) Water Quality Monitoring. (Wat. Code, § 79704.) If water quality monitoring is required as part of the Project, the Recipient shall collect and report water quality monitoring data to the State Water Board in a manner that is compatible and consistent with surface water monitoring data systems or groundwater monitoring data systems administered by the State Water Board. (o) Wild and Scenic Rivers. (Wat. Code, § 79711.) The Recipient shall ensure that the Project will not have an adverse effect on the values upon which a wild and scenic river or any other river is afforded protections pursuant to the California Wild and Scenic Rivers Act or the federal Wild and Scenic Rivers Act. C-33. State Water Board Action; Costs and Attorney Fees. The Recipient agrees that any remedy provided in this Agreement is in addition to and not in derogation of any other legal or equitable remedy available to the State Water Board as a result of breach of this Agreement by the Recipient, whether such breach occurs before or after completion of the Project, and exercise of any remedy provided by this Agreement by the State Water Board shall not preclude the State Water Board from pursuing any legal remedy or right which would otherwise be available. In the event of litigation between the parties hereto arising from this Agreement, it is agreed that each party shall bear its own costs and attorney fees. C-34. Termination; Immediate Repayment; Interest. (a) This Agreement may be terminated at any time prior to the End Date set forth on the cover and in Exhibit B, at the option of the State Water Board, upon violation by the Recipient of any material provision of this Agreement after such violation has been called to the attention of the Recipient and after failure of the Recipient to bring itself into compliance with the provisions of this Agreement within a reasonable time as established by the Division. (b) In the event of such termination, the Recipient agrees, upon demand, to immediately repay to the State Water Board an amount equal to Grant Funds disbursed hereunder, accrued interest, penalty assessments, and Additional Payments. In the event of termination, interest shall accrue on all amounts due at the highest legal rate of interest from the date that notice of termination is mailed to the Recipient to the date all monies due have been received by the State Water Board. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1074 C-35. Timeliness. Time is of the essence in this Agreement. C-36. Unenforceable Provision. In the event that any provision of this Agreement is unenforceable or held to be unenforceable, then the parties agree that all other provisions of this Agreement have force and effect and shall not be affected thereby. C-37. [Reserved] C-38. Venue. The State Water Board and the Recipient hereby agree that any action arising out of this Agreement shall be filed and maintained in the Superior Court in and for the County of Sacramento, California. C-39. Waiver and Rights of the State Water Board. Any waiver of rights by the State Water Board with respect to a default or other matter arising under the Agreement at any time shall not be considered a waiver of rights with respect to any other default or matter. Any rights and remedies of the State Water Board provided for in this Agreement are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1075 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1076 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1077 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1078 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1079 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1080 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1081 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1082 RECOMMENDATION(S): DENY claims filed by Metlife Auto & Home as subrogee of Karla Duron-Ponce, Nationwide Ins. as subrogee of Mohammad Noman, Anthony Secapure, Shabnam Sharifi and Afshin Shahidi. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: Metlife Auto & Home a/s/o Karla Duron-Ponce: Property claim for damage to vehicle in the amount of $1,186.92 Nationwide Insurance a/s/o Mohammad Noman: Property claim for damage to vehicle in the amount of $17,537.99 Anthony Secapure: Property claim for damage to vehicle in the amount of $1,800 Shabnam Sharifi & Afshin Shahidi: Property claim for damage to home in the amount of $11,400 CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The limitations period in Government Code section 945.6, subsection (a) (1) would not apply to these claimants. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Scott Selby, 925.313.1400 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 9 To:Board of Supervisors From:David Twa, County Administrator Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:Claims June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1083 RECOMMENDATION(S): AUTHORIZE the discharge from accountability for the account of Cook Paging/American Messaging totaling $663.23, which is not collectable because the debtor agency no longer exists. FISCAL IMPACT: The account to be discharged totals $663.23. This past due amount is for services the Department of Information Technology provided during 2013. 100% General Fund. BACKGROUND: The department attempted to collect this account multiple times, but is still unable to collect. Cook Paging was acquired by American Messaging, assets only, not debts. American Messaging states that they do not owe this invoice and that it should have been paid by Cook Paging. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The Department of Information Technology will continue to carry the uncollectable account on the books, thereby overstating the receivables. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Ed Woo 925-957-7771 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 10 To:Board of Supervisors From:Ed Woo, Chief Information Officer Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:Discharge from Accountability for Uncollected Account for Department of Information Technology June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1084 ATTACHMENTS Cook - American Messaging June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1085 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1086 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1087 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1088 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1089 RECOMMENDATION(S): RECEIVE this report concerning the final settlement of David Brown vs. Contra Costa County and AUTHORIZE payment from the Workers' Compensation Internal Service Fund, in the amount of $110,000 and waiver of court costs of $9,414.24. FISCAL IMPACT: Workers' Compensation Internal Service Fund payment of $110,000 and waiver of court costs. BACKGROUND: Attorney Mark A. Cartier, defense counsel for the County, has advised the County Administrator that within authorization an agreement has been reached settling the workers' compensation claim of David Brown vs. Contra Costa County. The Board's May 23, 2017 closed session vote was: Supervisors Gioia, Burgis, Mitchoff and Glover - Yes; Supervisor Andersen - Absent. This action is taken so that the terms of this final settlement and the earlier May 23, 2017 closed session vote of this Board authorizing is negotiated settlement are known publicly. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Case will not be settled. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Sharon Hymes-Offord 335-1450 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 11 To:Board of Supervisors From:Sharon Offord Hymes, Risk Manager Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:Settlement of Claim, David Brown vs. Contra Costa County June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1090 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE Board meeting minutes for April and May 2017, as on file with the Office of the Clerk of the Board. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: Government Code Section 25101(b) requires the Clerk of the Board to keep and enter in the minute book of the Board a full and complete record of the proceedings of the Board at all regular and special meetings, including the entry in full of all resolutions and of all decisions on questions concerning the allowance of accounts. The vote of each member on every question shall be recorded. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Joellen Bergamini 925.335.1906 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stephanie Mello, Deputy cc: C. 12 To:Board of Supervisors From:David Twa, County Administrator Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:APPROVE the Board meeting minutes for April and May 2017 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1091 RECOMMENDATION(S): Reappoint the following individual to the District IV-C Seat of the Alcohol and Other Drugs Advisory Board to a term expiring June 30, 2020, as recommended by Supervisor Karen Mitchoff. Tom Aswad Walnut Creek, CA 94598 FISCAL IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND: The mission of the Contra Costa County Alcohol and Other Drugs Advisory Board is to assess family and community needs regarding treatment and prevention of alcohol and drug abuse problems. We report our findings and recommendations to the Contra Costa Health Services Department, the Board of Supervisors and the communities we serve. The Alcohol and Other Drugs Advisory Board works in collaboration with the Alcohol and Other Drugs Services Division of Contra Costa Health Services. We provide input and recommendations as they pertain to alcohol and other drugs prevention, intervention and treatment services. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The District IV-C Seat would become vacant. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Dominic Aliano, (925) 521-7100 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 13 To:Board of Supervisors From:Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:Reappointment of Tom Aswad to the District IV-C Seat of the Alcohol and Other Drugs Advisory Board June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1092 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPOINT the following individual to the Alternate 2 Seat on the Alamo Police Services Advisory Committee for the remainder of a two-year term with an expiration date of December 31, 2018, as recommended by Supervisor Candace Andersen: Anthony Rocca Alamo, CA 94507 FISCAL IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND: Established on November 18, 1969, by Board Resolution 69/765, the purpose of the County Service Area P-2B Citizens Advisory Committee is to advise the Board of Supervisors and the Sheriff's Department on the needs of the Alamo community for extended police services which shall include, but not be limited to, enforcement of the State Vehicle Code, crime prevention, and litter control. On March 19, 2013, the Board of Supervisors approved a Board Order that retitled the County Service Area P-2B Citizens Advisory Committee to the "Alamo Police Services Advisory Committee". Alamo Police Services Advisory Committee is comprised of nine regular members and two alternates who each serve a two year term. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jill Ray, 925-957-8860 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: District 2 Supervisor, Maddy Book, APSAC, Appointee C. 14 To:Board of Supervisors From:Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:APPOINTMENT TO THE ALAMO POLICE SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1093 CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The Alternate 2 Seat will remain vacant. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1094 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPOINT Mustafa Alsalihy to the District 1 Seat on the IHSS Public Authority Advisory Committee, to a term ending on 6/13/2021. FISCAL IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND: Serves as an advisory council to the In Home Support Services Public Authority (IHSS), which is administered by the Employment and Human Services Department (EHSD). IHSS provides specialized support services to residents who are frail elderly, blind, or disabled. The Contra Costa County In-Home Supportive Services Public Authority is a public agency whose general purpose is to improve the IHSS program for IHSS consumers and workers. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: James Lyons, 510-231-8692 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 15 To:Board of Supervisors From:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:APPOINT Mustafa Alsalihy to the District 1 seat of the IHSS Public Authority Advisory Committee June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1095 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Public Authority services include: Recruiting and screening independent providers Maintaining a registry of providers Referring providers to IHSS consumers Training and educational opportunities for IHSS consumers and providers Support services for consumers and providers Mustafa Alsalihy San Pablo, CA 94806 Supervisor Gioia advertises his open advisory body seats in numerous ways including through his website, eblasts, and newsletters, as well as with the traditional media. ATTACHMENTS Mustafa_Alsalihy_Application June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1096 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1097 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1098 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1099 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1100 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1101 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1102 RECOMMENDATION(S): ACCEPT the resignation of Edith "Jovana" Fajardo from the CBO Seat 3 and APPOINT Tamisha Torres-Walker to the CBO Seat 3 on the Racial Justice Task Force; and ACCEPT Cardenas Shackelford as the replacement for the Antioch Unified School District Representative seat on the Racial Justice Task Force, as recommended by the Director of the Office of Reentry & Justice. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact due to this action to replace members of the Task Force. The project is 100% funded by the County's AB 109 Public Safety Realignment revenue. BACKGROUND: On April 7, 2015, the Board of Supervisors (BOS) received a letter from the Racial Justice Coalition requesting the review of certain topics within the local criminal justice system. The Public Protection Committee (PPC) generally hears all matters related to public safety within the County and was tasked with reviewing this referral by the BOS. On July 6, 2015, the PPC initiated discussion regarding this referral and directed staff to research certain items identified in the Coalition's letter to the BOS and return to the PPC in September 2015. Specifically, this was with regard to current workplace diversity training for county employees and current data on race in the County criminal justice system. On September 14, 2015, the PPC received a comprehensive report from staff on current data related to race in the County criminal justice system, information regarding the County workplace diversity training and examples of diversity and implicit bias trainings from across the country. At the November 9, 2015 meeting, the PPC received a APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: L. DeLaney, 925-335-1097 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 16 To:Board of Supervisors From:David Twa, County Administrator Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:Racial Justice Task Force Member Replacements June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1103 brief presentation reintroducing the referral and providing an update on how a 2008 Disproportionate Minority Contact (DMC) report compares with the statistical data presented at the September meeting. Following discussion, the PPC directed staff to return in December 2015, following discussions between the County Probation Officer, District Attorney and Public Defender, with thoughts about how to approach a new DMC study initiative in the County. On December 14, 2015, the PPC received an update from the County Probation Officer, District Attorney and Public Defender on how best to proceed with an update to the 2008 DMC report; including, establishing a task force to review and update findings from the 2008 report. During the 2008 study, the concept of establishing a new task force was discussed; however, the task force was not formed at that time. The PPC directed the three departments above to provide a written project scope and proposed task force composition for final review. On February 29, 2016, the PPC received a description of the proposed task force discussed at the December 2015 meeting from the County Probation Officer, District Attorney and Public Defender. The PPC accepted the proposed task force composition and clarified that the three school district seats should be represented by the West Contra Costa Unified School District, the Mount Diablo Unified School District and the Antioch Unified School District. On April 12, 2016, the Board of Supervisors accepted a report and related recommendations from the Committee resulting in the formation of a 17-member Disproportionate Minority Contact Task Force composed of the following: June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1104 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) County Probation Officer Public Defender District Attorney Sheriff-Coroner Health Services Director Superior Court representative County Police Chief’s Association representative Mount Diablo Unified School District representative Antioch Unified School District representative West Contra Costa Unified School District representative (5) Community-based organization (CBO) representatives (at least 1 representative from each region of the County and at least one representative from the faith and family community) Mental Health representative Public Member – At Large Subsequently, a 7-week recruitment process was initiated to fill the (5) CBO representative seats, the (1) Mental Health representative seat and the (1) Public Member - At Large seat. The deadline for submissions was June 15, 2016 and the County received a total of 28 applications by the deadline. On June 27, 2016, the PPC met to consider making appointments to the (5) five CBO representative seats, the (1) one Mental Health representative seat and the (1) one Public Member - At Large seat. At the conclusion of the of the meeting, the PPC directed staff to set a special meeting for early August to consider the final composition of the entire (17) seventeen member Task Force once all names were received from County departments and school districts. In addition, the PPC recommended changing the name of the Task Force to the "Racial Justice Task Force," which was determined to be more reflective of the efforts to evaluate racial disparities in the local criminal justice system.On August 15, 2016, the Committee approved the nominations for appointment to the Task Force, including a recommendation that the Superior Court designee seat be a non-voting member of the Task Force at the request of the Superior Court. On September 13, 2016 the Board of Supervisors approved the appointments to the Racial Justice Task Force (Attachment A). Subsequently, the CAO's office administered a procurement process to identify a firm to provide facilitation and data evaluation services to the Racial Justice Task Force. Resource Development Associates (RDA) was selected, and on February 14, 2017, the Board of Supervisors authorized a contract with RDA in the amount of $170,000 to provide services to the Task Force through June 30, 2018. On March 13, 2017, prior to the commencement of the Task Force project, the CAO's office received a notice of resignation from Edith (Jovana) Fajardo. The County was also notified that the Antioch Unified School District representative (Bob Sanchez) had requested to be replaced by a colleague, Cardenas Shackelford. Due to scheduling conflicts, the Public Protection Committee has not been able to meet since March 2017. However, the Racial Justice Task Force initiated its work on April 5, 2017; to date, there have been three meetings. In order to fill the vacancy on the Task Force in the most expeditious manner, staff recommends that Tamisha Torres-Walker replace Edith (Jovana) Fajardo in CBO Seat 3. Ms. Torres-Walker is the Founder & Executive Director of the Safe Return Project. She is a resident of Antioch and a member of the Racial Justice Coalition. Staff also recommends that Cardenas Shackelford be appointed as the replacement for Bob Sanchez for the Antioch Unified School District seat. Staff notes that another member appointed to the Task Force in CBO Seat 4 has not been able to attend Task Force meetings due to schedule conflicts (the Task Force meets the first Wednesdays of each month from 1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m.). It may be necessary to consider a replacement for that seat as well. The packet of applications received (by the original deadline) from applicants to the Racial Justice Task Force is included in Attachment B . AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: Racial Justice Task Force composition Attachment B: Applications to Task Force MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Vacancy Notice June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1105 Contra Costa CountyMember SeatName Title/Affiliation1. County Probation OfficerTodd BilleciCounty Probation Officer2. Public DefenderRobin LipetzkyPublic Defender3. District AttorneyTom KensokAssistant District Attorney4. Sheriff‐CoronerJohn LowdenCaptain, Sheriff's Office5. Health Services DirectorDr. William Walker Health Services Director6. Superior Court Designee*Magda LopezDirector of Court Programs and Services7.County Police Chief’s Association representativeBisa FrenchCaptain, Richmond Police Department8.Mount Diablo Unified School District representativeDebra MasonMDUSD Board Member9.Antioch Unified School District representativeBob SanchezAUSD Director of Student Support Services10.West Contra Costa Unified School District representativeMarcus WaltonWCCUSD Communications Director11. CBO seat 1Stephanie Medley RYSE; AB109 CAB; District I resident12. CBO seat 2Donnell JonesCCISCO; District I resident13. CBO seat 3Edith "Jovana" Fajardo ACCE Institute; District IV resident14. CBO seat 4My ChristianCCISCO; District III resident15. CBO seat 5Dennisha MarshFirst Five CCC; City of Pittsburg Community Advisory Council; District V resident16. Mental Health representative Christine Gerchow, PhD. Psychologist, Juvenile Hall‐Martinez; District IV resident17. Public Member – At Large Harlan GrossmanPast Chair AB 109 CAB; GARE participant; District II resident* Superior Court has requested this seat be non‐voting member of the Committee.Racial Justice Task Force, approved by BOS 9/13/16June 13, 2017Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors1106 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1107 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1108 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1109 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1110 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1111 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1112 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1113 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1114 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1115 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1116 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1117 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1118 June 13, 2017Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors1119 June 13, 2017Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors1120 June 13, 2017Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors1121 June 13, 2017Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors1122 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1123 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1124 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1125 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1126 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1127 Print Form Contra Costa County For O ffice Use Only Date Received: For Reviewers Use Only: Accepted Rejected BOARDS, COMMITTEES, AND COMMISSIONS APPLICATION MAIL OR DELIVER TO: Conlta Costa County CLERK OF THE BOARD 651 Pine Street, Rm. 106 Martinez, Cai'ifbmia 94553-1292 PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT IN INK (Each Position Requires a Separate Application) BOARD, COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION NAME AND SEAT TITLE YOU ARE APPLYING FOR: CorVirvti'TTSt; PRINT EXACT NAME OF BOARD, COMMITTEE, OR COMMISSION PRINT EXACT SEAT NAME (If applicable) I.Name: (Last Name)(First Name)(Middle Name) 2. Address: (No)(Street) (Apt)(City) (State) (Zip Code) 3. Phones: (Home No.)(Work No.)(Cell No.) 4. Email Address; 5. EDUCATION; Check appropriate box if you possess one of the foliowing: High School Diploma □ G.E.D. Certificate 0 ^ a lifo rn ia High School Proficiency Certificate □ Give Highest Grade or Educational Level Achieved! Names of colleges / universities attended Course of Study / Major Degree Awarded Units Completed Degree Type Date Degree Awarded Semester Quarter A) C■ C ■ Yes No 1 1 1 B) Yes No 1 1 1 1.... C) Yes No 1 1 1 1 , D) Other schools / training completed: Course Studied Hours Completed Certificate Awarded: LAVU ^{P(P YesNolvHT 1 THIS FORM IS A PUBLIC DOCUMENT June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1128 6. PLEASE FILL OUT THE FOLLOWING SECTION COMPLETELY. List experience that relates to the qualifications needed to serve on the local appointive body. Begin with your most recent experience. A resume or other supporting documentation may be attached but it may not be used as a substitute for completing this section. A) Dates (Month, Day, Year) From To Total: Yrs. Mos. Hrs. per week I. Volunteer □ Title Employer’s Name and Address Duties Performed B) Dates (Month, Day, Year) From To Title Duties Performed Total: Yrs. Mos. Hrs. perweek[ ^ ^ I . Volunteer l~l Employer’s Name and Address f\y(» • S 'H i /P ~ k \ J y • C) Dates (Month, Day, Year) From To I itie Duties Performed Total: Yrs. Mos. Hrs. per weekL I. Volunteer □ Employer’s Name and Address O^nncll <^oo 'f'-e *in ^ < -f. D) Dates (Month, Day, Year) From To Title Duties Performed ^\le>\uyir^-eC IT' Employer’s Name and Address Total: Yrs. Mos. Hrs. per week . Volunteer y y ~ ^ ^ e /p -p fu J l THIS FORM IS A PUBLIC DOCUMENT June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1129 7. How did you learn about this vacancy? I ICCC Homepagel | Walk-In [ |Newspaper Advertisement [^District Supervisor | [Other p m U C - 8. Do you have a Familial or Financial Relationship with a member of the Board of Supervisors? (Please see Board Resolution no. 2011/55, attached); No I I Yes If Yes, please Identify the nature of the relationship .p:C 9. Do you have any flnat^al relationships with the County such as grants, contracts, or other economic relations? N o _ n _ Yes |T f If Yes, please Identify the nature of the relationship: I CERTIFY that the statements made by me in this application are true, complete, and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief, and are made In good faith. I acknowledge and understand that all Information In this application is publlcally accessible. I understand and agree that misstatements / omissions of material fact may cause forfeiture of my rights to serve on a Board, ntra Costa County. Sign Name: ________________Date: l Impo rtant information 1. This appiication is a public document and is subject to the Califbmia Public Records Act (CA Gov. Code §6250-6270). 2. Send the completed paper application to the Office of the Clerk of the Board at: 651 Pine Street, Room 106, Martinez, CA 94553. 3. A resume or other relevant information may be submitted with this application. 4. All members are required to take the Ibllowing training: 1) The Brown Act, 2) The Better Govemment Ordinance, and 3) Ethics Training. 5. Members of boards, commissbns, and committees may be required to: 1) file a Statement of Economic Interest Form also known as a Form 700, and 2) complete the State Ethics Training Course as required byAB 1234. 6. Advisory body meetings may be held in various locations and some locations may not be accessible by public transportation. 7. Meeting dates and times are subject to change and may occur up to two days per month. 8. Some boards, committees, or commissbns may assign members to subcommittees or work groups whbh may require an additbnal commitment of time. THIS FORM IS A PUBLIC DOCUMENT June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1130 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted Resolution no. 2011/55 on 2/08/2011 as follows: IN THE MATTER OF ADOPTING A POLICY MAKING FAMILY MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS DIELIGIBEE FOR APPOINTMENT TO BOARDS, COMMITTEES OR COMMISSIONS FOR WHICH THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS IS THE APPOINTING AUTHORITY WHEREAS the Board of Supervisors wishes to avoid the reality or appearance of improper influence or favoritism; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the following policy is hereby adopted: I. SCOPE: This policy applies to appointments to any seats on boards, committees or commissions for which the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors is the appointing authority. II. POLICY: A person will not be eligible for appointment if he/she is related to a Board of Supervisors’ Member in any of the following relationships: 1. Mother, father, son, and daughter; 2. Brother, sister, grandmother, grandfather, grandson, and granddaughter; 3. Great-grandfather, great-grandmother, aunt, uncle, nephew, niece, great-grandson, and great-granddaughter; 4. First cousin; 5. Husband, wife, father-in-law, mother-in-law, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, stepson, and stepdaughter; 6. Sister-in-law (brother’s spouse or spouse’s sister), brother-in-law (sister’s spouse or spouse’s brother), spouse’s grandmother, spouse’s grandfather, spouse’s granddaughter, and spouse’s grandson; 7. Registered domestic partner, pursuant to California Family Code section 297. 8. The relatives, as defined in 5 and 6 above, for a registered domestic partner. 9. Any person with whom a Board Member shares a financial interest as defined in the Political Reform Act (Gov’t Code §87103, Financial Interest), such as a business partner or business associate. THIS FORM IS A PUBLIC DOCUMENT June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1131 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1132 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1133 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1134 June 13, 2017Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors1135 June 13, 2017Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors1136 June 13, 2017Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors1137 June 13, 2017Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors1138 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1139 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1140 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1141 June 13, 2017Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors1142 June 13, 2017Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors1143 June 13, 2017Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors1144 June 13, 2017Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors1145 June 13, 2017Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors1146 June 13, 2017Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors1147 June 13, 2017Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors1148 June 13, 2017Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors1149 June 13, 2017Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors1150 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1151 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1152 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1153 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1154 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1155 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1156 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1157 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1158 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1159 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1160 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1161 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1162 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1163 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1164 June 13, 2017Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors1165 June 13, 2017Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors1166 June 13, 2017Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors1167 June 13, 2017Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors1168 June 13, 2017Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors1169 June 13, 2017Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors1170 June 13, 2017Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors1171 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1172 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1173 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1174 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1175 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1176 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1177 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1178 June 13, 2017Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors1179 June 13, 2017Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors1180 June 13, 2017Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors1181 June 13, 2017Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors1182 June 13, 2017Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors1183 THIS FORM IS A PUBLIC DOCUMENT BOARD, COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION NAME AND SEAT TITLE YOU ARE APPLYING FOR: ____________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________ PRINT EXACT NAME OF BOARD, COMMITTEE, OR COMMISSION PRINT EXACT SEAT NAME (if applicable) 5. EDUCATION: Check appropriate box if you possess one of the following: High School Diploma G.E.D. Certificate California High School Proficiency Certificate Give Highest Grade or Educational Level Achieved________________________________________________ Names of colleges / universities attended Course of Study / Major Degree Awarded Units Completed Degree Type Date Degree Awarded Semester Quarter A) Yes No B) Yes No C) Yes No D) Other schools / training completed: Course Studied Hours Completed Certificate Awarded: Yes No For Reviewers Use Only: Accepted Rejected Contra Costa County Contra Costa County CLERK OF THE BOARD 651 Pine Street, Rm. 106 Martinez, California 94553-1292 PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT IN INK (Each Position Requires a Separate Application) BOARDS, COMMITTEES, AND COMMISSIONS APPLICATION MAIL OR DELIVER TO: 1.Name:_______________________________________________________________________ (Last Name) (First Name) (Middle Name) 2. Address:_______________________________________________________ (No.) (Street) (Apt.) (City) (State) (Zip Code) 3. Phones:______________________ (Home No.) (Work No.) (Cell No.) 4. Email Address:______________________________________________ For Office Use Only Date Received: Print Form Disproportionate Minority Contact Task Force Public Member - At Large O'Malley Denis Michael M.S. Stanford University Stanford University Loyola University of Los Angeles Santa Monica College Environmental Engineering Engineering Pre-Engineering 85 54 182 MS BS 1972 1971 Project Management Project Management Institute 160 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1184 THIS FORM IS A PUBLIC DOCUMENT 6. PLEASE FILL OUT THE FOLLOWING SECTION COMPLETELY. List experience that relates to the qualifications needed to serve on the local appointive body. Begin with your most recent experience. A resume or other supporting documentation may be attached but it may not be used as a substitute for completing this section. A) Dates (Month, Day, Year) From To Total: Yrs. Mos. Hrs. per week_____ . Volunteer Title Duties Performed Employer’s Name and Address B) Dates (Month, Day, Year) From To Total: Yrs. Mos. Hrs. per week_____ . Volunteer Title Duties Performed Employer’s Name and Address C) Dates (Month, Day, Year) From To Total: Yrs. Mos. Hrs. per week_____ . Volunteer Title Duties Performed Employer’s Name and Address D) Dates (Month, Day, Year) From To Total: Yrs. Mos. Hrs. per week_____ . Volunteer Title Duties Performed Employer’s Name and Address 7/7/1972 3/22/2014 41 4 40+ Executive Engineer Brown and Caldwell PO Box 8054 Walnut Creek CA 94596 Performed a variety of activities beginning as an entry-level engineer, assigned increasing responsibility over the ensuing years, concluding with a 3-year assignment as Executive Engineer responsible for 120+ employees in Northern California: a balance among technical, management, and employee relations. Resume is attached. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1185 THIS FORM IS A PUBLIC DOCUMENT 7. How did you learn about this vacancy? CCC Homepage Walk-In Newspaper Advertisement District Supervisor Other _________________________ 8. Do you have a Familial or Financial Relationship with a member of the Board of Supervisors? (Please see Board Resolution no. 2011/55, attached): No ______ Yes______ If Yes, please identify the nature of the relationship: ______________________________________________ 9. Do you have any financial relationships with the County such as grants, contracts, or other economic relations? No ______ Yes______ If Yes, please identify the nature of the relationship: ______________________________________________ I CERTIFY that the statements made by me in this application are true, complete, and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief, and are made in good faith. I acknowledge and understand that all information in this application is publically accessible. I understand and agree that misstatements / omissions of material fact may cause forfeiture of my rights to serve on a Board, Committee, or Commission in Contra Costa County. Sign Name: _____________________________________________ Date: __________________________________ Important Information 1. This application is a public document and is subject to the California Public Records Act (CA Gov. Code §6250-6270). 2. Send the completed paper application to the Office of the Clerk of the Board at: 651 Pine Street, Room 106, Martinez, CA 94553. 3. A résumé or other relevant information may be submitted with this application. 4. All members are required to take the following training: 1) The Brown Act, 2) The Better Government Ordinance, and 3) Ethics Training. 5. Members of boards, commissions, and committees may be required to: 1) file a Statement of Economic Interest Form also known as a Form 700, and 2) complete the State Ethics Training Course as required by AB 1234. 6. Advisory body meetings may be held in various locations and some locations may not be accessible by public transportation. 7. Meeting dates and times are subject to change and may occur up to two days per month. 8. Some boards, committees, or commissions may assign members to subcommittees or work groups which may require an additional commitment of time. June 13, 2016 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1186 THIS FORM IS A PUBLIC DOCUMENT THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted Resolution no. 2011/55 on 2/08/2011 as follows: WHEREAS the Board of Supervisors wishes to avoid the reality or appearance of improper influence or favoritism; IN THE MATTER OF ADOPTING A POLICY MAKING FAMILY MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS INELIGIBLE FOR APPOINTMENT TO BOARDS, COMMITTEES OR COMMISSIONS FOR WHICH THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS IS THE APPOINTING AUTHORITY NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the following policy is hereby adopted: 1. Mother, father, son, and daughter; 2. Brother, sister, grandmother, grandfather, grandson, and granddaughter; I. SCOPE: This policy applies to appointments to any seats on boards, committees or commissions for which the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors is the appointing authority. II. POLICY: A person will not be eligible for appointment if he/she is rela ted to a Board of Supervisors’ Member in any of the following relationships: 3. Great-grandfather, great-grandmother, aunt, uncle, nephew, niece, great-grandson, and great-granddaughter; 4. First cousin; 5. Husband, wife, father-in-law, mother-in-law, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, stepson, and stepdaughter; 6. Sister-in-law (brother’s spouse or spouse’s sister), brother-in-law (sister’s spouse or spouse’s brother), spouse’s grandmother, spouse’s grandfather, spouse’s granddaughter, and spouse’s grandson; 7. Registered domestic partner, pursuant to California Family Code section 297. 8. The relatives, as defined in 5 and 6 above, for a registered domestic partner. 9. Any person with whom a Board Member shares a financial interest as defined in the Political Reform Act (Gov’t Code §87103, Financial Interest), such as a business partner or business associate. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1187 Experience Summary Mr. O'Malley has more than 40 years of experience in environmental engineering including engineering studies, design and construction management of sewage collection, treatment and disposal facilities; water supply, treatment and distribution facilities; and hazardous materials management projects . He frequently provides dispute resolution, forensic, forensic and litigation support, claims management, value engineering, scheduling, cost estimating, and related services. He also conducts constructability reviews; his design and construction experience benefit projects at the planning and early design stages as he presents considerations and solutions based on his experiences working in the field. Mr. O’Malley holds certifications from the Dispute Resolution Board Foundation (DRBF) and from Caltrans evidencing that he has received training in the Dispute Resolution Board (DRB) processes and meets the relevant organization's requirements for DRB panel members and panel chair. Dispute Resolution Boards (DRB) As a member of a three-member Dispute Resolution Board: DRB Member, City of Davis, California, Design/Build Wastewater Treatment Plant Secondary and Tertiary Improvements Project: $ 68,957,000 negotiated agreement to design, construct, and commission the secondary and tertiary improvements to the existing treatment plant to improve reliability and prepare the City for future effluent requirements. The design is expected to incorporate additional mid-process passive diversion of flows to emergency storage ponds, relocating a lighting electrical panel and programmable logic controller (PLC) to a central communications/electrical room, providing additional storm drainage piping and pumping to meet more stringent protection requirements, additional electric service equipment required for 12kV service from PG&E, and adequate asphalt paving to all treatment facilities and motor control centers. DRB Member, SCVWD South Bay Advanced Recycled Water Treatment Facility (ARWTF) Project: $42,380,000 bid for the construction of a new pre‐ engineered 235‐foot by 135‐foot metal building founded on a concrete mat foundation. The building will house the new MF system, RO system, the UV disinfection system, associated control and process systems and an operations/control room, several chemical storage, pumping and metering areas outside the structure, a 2.25 MG and a 225,000 gallon stainless steel storage tanks founded on concrete piles. The project will tie into the San Jose/Santa Clara Joint WPCP in three locations and connect to the new facility with three new pipe lines: 1,300 LF 36‐inch secondary effluent line, 2,500 LF 16‐inch backwash waste line, 4,600 LF 12‐inch reject water line - all installed using trenchless construction. Pumps used in the facility range in size/type from 500 HP vertical diffusion pumps to 0.5 HP diaphragm pumps . DRB Member, SFPUC Lake Merced Pump Station Essential Upgrade Project: $31,584,000 bid for construction of a new pump station and electrical utility buildings, seismic upgrade of the existing station structure. In addition, Education M.S., Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, California, 1972 B.S., Engineering, Loyola University of Los Angeles, California, 1971 Registration Professional Engineer C23992, California, 1974; Inactive: 5518, Arkansas; 20329, Louisiana; 8715, New Mexico; 058492, New York; E-54546, Ohio; 13360, Oklahoma; 52668, Texas Certification  DRB Foundation DRB Administrator/Member  Caltrans DRB Member/Dispute Resolution Advisor (DRA)  Project Management Professional (PMP) 1467845,  FA/CPR/AED  Confined Space Entry  OSHA 10-Hour Construction Safety Relevant Expertise  Dispute resolution  Claims prevention/ management  Arbitration and litigation support  Forensic engineering  Construction management  Risk management planning  Value engineering  Constructability review  Treatment facilities planning and design June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1188 outdated mechanical and electrical systems will be replaced with new pumps, motors, emergency generators, surge tanks, electrical distribution, and station control systems DRB Member, SFPUC Seismic Update of Bay Division Pipeline Nos . 3 & 4 at the Hayward Fault Project: $31,320,000 bid for construction to reduce the risk of pipeline failure in a major seismic event at the Hayward Fault. Work includes a new articulated concrete vault; 72- to 78-inch diameter welded steel pipe; 72-inch- diameter slip joint; 96-inch-diameter steel pipe; 96-inch diameter expansion joint; concrete vault; concrete encasement of existing 96-inch diameter pipe, modifications to an existing slip joint vault, slip-lining existing 96-inch diameter pipe; 12-inch and 30-inch diameter water pipelines; drainage improvements and utility relocation. DRB Member, SFPUC University Mound Reservoir North Basin Seismic Upgrades Project: $29,597,000 bid for construction of seismic retrofit and upgrade to the north basin, which includes .installation of internal moment resisting frames, strengthening of internal structural elements, installation of seismically resistant roof joints, and installation of solar reflective roof coating. DRB Member, SFPUC Sutro Reservoir Rehabilitation and Seismic Upgrade Project : $28,586,000 bid for construction to seismically retrofit the roof and supporting structures, upgrade the foundation, install drainage system on the reservoir embankment, improve the reservoir under drain, spall and crack repair of the roof structure, install concrete lining, install new ventilations on the side walls, upgrade the outlet system, and install waterproofing on the roof. Dispute Resolution Advisor (DRA) As a single neutral DRA: DRA, SFPUC Southeast Water Pollution Control Plant Oxygen Generation Plant Replacement : $11,500,000 for construction to replace the antiquated oxygen plants with two technologically advanced 45 TPD oxygen generation plants to allow WWE Operations to have optimum control on the utilization of oxygen, significantly reducing energy consumption. The project also included gaseous oxygen supply and plant air piping; concrete foundations; medium voltage system: instrumentation and control systems; and miscellaneous landscape and site improvement work. DRA, SFPUC Southeast Water Pollution Control Plant Chemical System Relocation and Facility Upgrades: $14,025,000 bid for construction to improve the reliability of aging facilities at the Southeast Plant by replacing and relocating the chemical system and upgrading various mechanical systems, electrical systems, and repairing concrete defects. Construction Claims Management Representative projects include:  Pleasant Grove WWTP, Roseville, California  Randolph Water Treatment Plant (WTP), Tucson, Arizona  Joshua Street WPCP, Albany, Georgia  Kamole Weir WTP Improvements, Maui, Hawaii  Las Vegas Street WWTP, Advanced Wastewater Treatment, City of Colorado Springs, Colorado  Groundwater cleanup project for confidential industrial client in Southern California. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1189 Arbitration and Litigation Support Services Representative projects in arbitration, litigation and expert witness testimony include:  Confidential public agency in California, on behalf of agency, successfully defending against allegations of criminal violations of the Clean Water Act  East Bay Municipal Utility District, Oakland, California, assisted District in defense from personal injury suit.  MBR WWTP, on behalf of confidential Design/Build contractor, during mediation successfully assisted in reducing $0.5-million claim against contractor to $10,000 settlement  East Lynn Combined Sewer Overflow Abatement System, Lynn, Massachusetts, on behalf of the contractor, which reached a satisfactory settlement (undisclosed)  NEORSD Westerly Wastewater Treatment Center, Cleveland, Ohio, on behalf of District, which received a settlement (an estimated $25 million)  WWTP, Mission, Texas, on behalf of design engineer, which accepted a settlement of undisclosed amount  Fort Smith, Arkansas, consent decree, expert witness on behalf of City  City of Garland’s Duck Creek WWTP, Sunnyvale, Texas, on behalf of City, which received a settlement of $10+ million from design engineer and contractor  Construction dispute arbitrator as member of American Arbitration Association’s Panel of Construction Arbitrators. Construction Management East Mission Gorge Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation, Mission Trails Regional Park, San Diego, California Construction Manager. This project was constructed in accordance with stringent environmental constraints, during the winter months only, in a river gorge in a federally protected habitat inside the park . Construction occurred under the watchful eyes of environmentalists, the Regional Park Rangers, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and other federal, state and local agencies. The trunk sewer was kept in service during construction. The project included installing cured-in-place pipe (CIPP) in approximately 30,000 feet of deteriorated concrete pipe, rehabilitating more than 100 manholes using various materials, and employing environmental mitigation measures for protected habitat along the alignment. San Francisco International Airport Master Plan Expansion Program, Utilities Relocation Projects, City and County of San Francisco, California Project Manager. Denis directed the construction management (CM) team for this 11-year program. This series of 12 separate construction projects totaling more than $150 million relocated existing utilities (water, domestic and industrial wastewater sewers, storm sewers, fuel and gas lines, and electrical and telephone ducts) to accommodate constructing new terminal facilities and tenant improvements . In addition to the construction challenges in and around an international airport, extensive coordination was required with the following regulatory agencies: Federal Aviation Administration, San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board, California Department of Health Services, County of San Mateo, City and County of San Francisco, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). For construction in areas west of Highway 101, stringent environmental constraints were specified and enforced, most notably protecting the endangered San Francisco garter snake. The USFWS routinely monitored construction activities to confirm compliance with specified mitigation measures. Injection/Extraction Well System, Santa Clara Valley Water District (SCVWD), Santa Clara, California Construction Manager. Denis managed the construction of 50 injection/ extraction wells for the SCVWD. Construction was completed in an environmentally sensitive wildlife preserve in a wetlands area adjacent to the San Francisco Bay. In addition to managing construction activities, Denis negotiated and coordinated with the following agencies that were interested in the project and the affected areas: State Water Resources June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1190 Control Board, Department of Water Resources, and U.S. Corps of Engineers, City of Palo Alto, Santa Clara County and Stanford University. Although hampered by weather and regulatory delays, construction was completed successfully, and regulatory agencies approved revegetating affected areas. Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) UV Design Assist Project, City of Roseville, California Project Manager. This project was constructed under the Design/Assist project delivery method that involved constructing an $18-million facility modification to provide UV disinfection to meet the California Toxics Rule. Denis directed the construction management (CM) team from contract negotiations through startup . He oversaw contract administration, field engineering and inspection, testing and startup services, and Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) of the CM team activities. This project received the Project Achievement Award from the Construction Management Association of America. Folsom South Canal Connection, East Bay Municipal Utilities District (EBMUD), California Contract Strategist and QA/QC. Denis directed efforts to develop contracting strategies and value engineering. He provided QA/QC oversight on work products to the client. The project included value engineering, contracting strategy and planning, cost estimating and scheduling at the 30, 60, 90 and 100 percent design levels, and addressed multiple environmental issues for 20 miles of 72-inch-diameter steel pipe, two raw water pumping stations, jack-and-bores, tunneling and open cut through California’s wine country. Construction cost: $217 million. Pleasant Grove WWTP, City of Roseville, California Project Manager. This project involved constructing an $85 million wastewater treatment facility. Denis directed a multidiscipline constructability/bidability review at 50 and 75 percent design levels, prequalified general contractors and electrical subcontractors, and prenegotiated equipment purchases, Denis directed the construction management (CM) team provided contract administration, conducted field engineering and inspection, and provided testing and startup services . The project included the following major elements: influent interceptor, headworks, aerated grit basin, oxidation ditches, secondary clarifiers, sand filters, chlorine contact basins, a reclaimed water pump station, aerated sludge holding tanks, sludge dewatering building, a filter support building, chemical building, two electrical control buildings, an administration building, a maintenance building, a return activated sludge (RAS)/waste activated sludge (WAS) pump station, effluent storage ponds, a stormwater storage pond, an emergency storage pond, outfall pipeline, outfall structure and miscellaneous yard structures. Design/Build 1.2 Megawatt Cogeneration System, Union Sanitary District (USD), Union City, California Project Manager. Denis managed the Design-Build project to design and build a 1.2-MW digester gas cogeneration project at the 30-mgd WWTP. He prepared the fast-track design documents, accelerated delivery equipment procurement documents, and provided construction management and inspection for this $1.4 million project. This project incorporated an innovative digester gas purification system (siloxane removal) and extremely low engine exhaust emissions. Bradshaw Interceptor Section 7A, Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District (SRCSD), Sacramento, California Principal-in-Charge. Denis provided oversight of construction management services for the Bradshaw 7A Pipeline project. This project included 13,700 LF of 54-inch-, 84-inch- and 90-inch-diameter RCP, a junction structure, and 250 LF of 84-inch-diameter reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) direct jack tunneling. This was a follow-on project to the Van Maren Pump Station for the County’s Upper Northwest Interceptor projects . Brown and Caldwell was brought on at 70 percent design to provide a comprehensive constructability review . Denis’ team provided bid assistance and onsite construction management services that included contract administration and field inspection. Van Maren Pumping Station Section 8, SRCSD, Sacramento, California Principal-in-Charge. Denis provided oversight of inspection services for this $12-million project. The main components included a pumping station and operations building, open-cut 48-inch-diameter sanitary sewer pipeline, and dual 30-inch-diameter ductile iron force mains. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1191 Central Avenue Phase II Sewer Replacement Project, USD, Union City, California Technical Advisor. Denis provided technical advice to the construction management team. This $1 million project involved constructing approximately 5,000 feet of PVC pipe ranging in size from 8 to 18 inches in diameter, and included replacing 30 laterals and 15 manholes, and repaving streets to City standards . Effluent Outfall, Aliso Water Management Agency (AWMA), Laguna Niguel, California Construction Manager. Denis managed the construction of the offshore and onshore construction. As part of a program to construct a regional wastewater collection, treatment and disposal system, AWMA constructed an outfall (both ocean and land portions) to convey treated effluent from the regional treatment in Laguna Niguel to Aliso Canyon. The pipelines’ land portion connected to the ocean portion at Aliso Creek in South Laguna, and was constructed through a defined nature area and a golf course. Maintaining positive relations with the surrounding community and businesses adjacent to the construction areas, and coordination with the State Water Resources Control Board, California Fish and Game, Orange County and the U.S . Coast Guard were essential to successful project completion. North Interceptor Wet Weather Facilities, East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD), Oakland, California Office Engineer. As part of its long-term program to address wet-weather flows, EBMUD constructed 10,000 feet of 30-inch- to 60-inch-diameter pipe and a 24-mgd pump station through the residential and industrial areas in Albany, Berkeley and Richmond. Denis directed multidiscipline engineering office activities in support of the CM team. The project included both force main and gravity pipe, with pipeline sections supported on piles. Much of the pipeline paralleled Interstate 80, which required coordination with the California Department of Health Services, Pacific Gas and Electric, California Department of Transportation, and the cities of Albany, Berkeley and Richmond. The project included three bore-and-jack sections under I-80 in Albany, under I-580 in Richmond and under the Southern Pacific Railroad lines . Hazardous materials management and disposal was also a key issue for this project. Water Reclamation Plant Expansion (30 mgd), Central Contra Costa Sanitary District, Martinez, California Assistant Resident Engineer. Denis assisted the Resident Engineer in managing the expansion and process modification project that included high lime addition primary sedimentation tanks, fine-bubble diffusion activated sludge (including steam turbine-driven centrifugal blowers), secondary clarification, nitrification and denitrification, chlorine disinfection, anaerobic sludge digestion and sludge incineration (with lime recovery). Sewer Rehabilitation, Narragansett Bay Water Quality Management Commission, Providence, Rhode Island Resident Engineer. The Narragansett Bay Water Quality Management District Commission retained Brown and Caldwell to rehabilitate the Allens Avenue Interceptor in Providence. The interceptor was a 102-inch-diameter brick sewer built in the late 1890s. With invert about 30 feet below road surface, the sewer carries 50 mgd of wastewater during dry weather and as much as 150 mgd of wet-weather flow. Because of groundwater eroding surrounding soil foundations, the sewer deteriorated and suffered structural damage. Raw sewage was diverted to Narragansett Bay under a two-week permit from Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The contractor worked 24/7 to complete as much stabilization as possible within the time allowed . Brown and Caldwell provided a resident engineer and an inspector for three daily shifts. Denis was the senior of three resident engineers working under the direction of Brown and Caldwell’s construction manager. Temporary facilities for the construction manager, resident engineers and inspectors were established near the site to facilitate immediate communication with the contractor and the owner. To help ensure worker protection, a shoring system was installed in the threatened sewer section . Steel ribs and wood lagging were then installed to provide a more permanent structure. Finally, the entire length was covered with shotcrete to provide corrosion protection for the steel and to optimize the flow line for the sewage. Duck Creek WWTP (30 mgd) Modifications, Garland, Texas Project Director. This eight-year program culminated in constructing modifications necessary to convert a physical/chemical treatment process to the trickling filter/solids contact process (the first wastewater June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1192 treatment facility in Texas to use this process). In addition to the technical challenges during construction, Denis negotiated and coordinated with five federal and state agencies regarding environmental mitigation measures, interim and final discharge permits, and funding; participated as an expert witness in litigation related to previous construction projects; and conducted briefings for city council, the public and other affected parties regarding environmental, technical and socioeconomic issues. Construction included modifying the headworks and primary sedimentation tanks, converting the rock media trickling filters to 16-foot-deep plastic media trickling filters, new fine-bubble diffusion solids contact tanks, converting secondary clarifiers to provide additional depth and capacity, new secondary clarifiers, converting carbon contact tanks to gravity filters, and modifying chlorine disinfection. Honouliuli WWTP Expansion, Unit 1A, City and County of Honolulu, Hawaii Quality Assurance Officer. Under consent decree terms, the client constructed new secondary treatment facilities ($24 million) and a new maintenance building ($4 million), with each project constructed by separate contractors on the same site. Denis provided QA/QC for the CM team. The secondary treatment facilities project included implementing the trickling filter/solids contact process two biotowers, 75,000-gallon solids contact tanks, 17,000-gallon solids reaeration tanks, two clarifiers, and 2-meter gravity belt thickeners housed in a new building. The maintenance building’s key components included a two-story mechanical maintenance shop with overhead crane, electronics shop, equipment storage, and parts storage and staging . The secondary treatment facilities were completed ahead of schedule, thereby meeting the compliance deadline prescribed in the consent decree. WWTP Expansion, City of Benicia, California Principal-in-Charge. The City expanded its wastewater treatment facilities to provide additional secondary treatment capacity, sludge thickening, sludge belt filter presses, digester modifications, and other treatment plant upgrades. Denis provided oversight of the CM team. The construction was completed without any adverse impact on the environmentally sensitive wetlands adjacent to the construction site. Prequalification of Prime Contractors and Subcontractors Denis prepared prequalification documents, conducted review and analysis of the submittals, and presented recommendations to the project owners for acceptable contractors.  Microtunneling contractors for various projects, USD, Union City, California  Utoy Creek Water Reclamation Center Improvements, Atlanta, Georgia: o Contract 1: $108-million WWTP expansion o Contract 2: $20-million administration, laboratory, and maintenance buildings  South River Water Reclamation Center Improvements, Atlanta, Georgia: $70-million plant expansion  East Area Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) Facilities Improvements, Atlanta, Georgia: $16-million CSO improvements  R.M. Clayton Water Reclamation Center Improvements, Atlanta, Georgia: o Contract 2: $100-million plant expansion o Contract 3: $100-million plant expansion  Pleasant Grove WWTP, Roseville, California: $85-million new facility  Easterly WWTP Expansion, Vacaville, California: $65 million. Constructability Reviews As Review Team Leader, representative projects include:  Pleasant Grove WWTP, Roseville, California  WWTP Expansion, Benicia, California June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1193  Sacramento River WTP, Sacramento, California, $80 million water treatment plant expansion and modifications.  Butler Drive Water Reclamation Facility, $100-million MBR wastewater treatment facility. As Review Team Member, representative projects include:  WPCF Upgrade and Capacity Restoration, $58 million, San Leandro, California Value Engineering (VE)  VE Team Member for City of Springfield, Missouri, Southwest Clean Water Plant Biosolids Treatment Improvements. Estimated construction cost: $34 million.  VE constructability review team leader and value engineering team member for the City of Peoria’s planned 10-mgd Butler Drive Water Reclamation Facility. Estimated construction cost: $100+ million.  Value analysis leader for the Water Pollution Control Facility Aeration System Retrofit for the City of Woodland, California, Estimated construction cost: $10.75 million.  VE team member for design build documents for Water Pollution Control Plant Modifications for City of Davis, California. Estimated construction cost: $74 million.  VE Team member for City of Colorado Springs Utilities, Colorado, Mesa Water Treatment Plant Treatment Process Alternatives.  VE team member for Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, Yorba Linda, California, Diemer WTP (320 mgd average, 520 mgd maximum) Electrical Improvements. Estimated construction cost: $18 to $22 million.  Value analysis team member for the City of Los Angeles Central Outfall Sewer Rehabilitation Project for a 60-inch by 73-inch brick sewer, 14,000 LF, original capacity of 100 cfs, constructed in 1904.  VE team member on 30 percent design for the Croton WTP at Mosholu, which had a 144 mgd average and 290 mgd maximum flow. Estimated construction cost: $1.2 billion.  VE team member for Roosevelt Roads Elementary School design, United States Navy.  VE team member for two utilities relocation project designs that were part of the San Francisco International Airport Master Plan Expansion Program.  Completed Module I value engineering training. Water Supply, Treatment, Distribution and Conservation  Investigation of Plastic Pipe Failures, American Water Works Association Research Foundation.  Investigation of Cement-Mortar Lining Failures, American Water Works Association Research Foundation.  Alameda County Water District, Fremont, California  Design Review and Revision, Mission San Jose WTP (12 mgd).  Study of Water Supply, Treatment, and Distribution System, Los Banos, California. Confidential Client, Fort Worth, Texas Project Advisor. Denis provided technical oversight to the design team to design a 42-inch-diameter water transmission pipeline. Residential Retrofit Water Conservation Program, City of San Jose, California Project Engineer. Denis investigated and evaluated industrial water conservation techniques and cost effectiveness in semiconductor, printed circuit, paper recycling and food processing plants. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1194 Wastewater Collection, Treatment, Disposal and Reclamation  Disinfection alternatives study for the Oro Loma Sanitary District, California.  Monterey Regional Water Pollution Control Agency preliminary design report and design of coating system rehabilitation, including design of permanent bypass. Developed chemical (FeCl3 and NaOH) addition systems, monitoring program, scrubber system evaluation, and prechlorination system modifications for reduction and control of H2S generation.  Sewage master plan, RMPP, odor control study, industrial discharges assessment, and pretreatment program development, Benicia, California.  Waste load allocation studies for industrial clients, Arkansas and Louisiana.  Wastewater master plan, Corpus Christi, Texas.  Wastewater rate study, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.  Technical investigation and review of sewage collector and interceptor system, Suffolk County Sewer District No. 3, New York.  Coordination check for design of 50-mgd WWTP, Appleton, Wisconsin. Westerly Process Options Analysis, Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District, Cleveland, Ohio Project Director. Denis analyzed this 50-mgd average, 100-mgd maximum physical/chemical treatment plant, assessing the existing treatment process, evaluating biological treatment process alternatives and developing the recommended project plan. Village Creek WWTP, Fort Worth, Texas Principal-in-Charge. Denis provided oversight for the design of anaerobic digestion, thickening and dewatering facilities, and sludge-only landfill disposal for the 125-mgd plant. Dallas Central and White Rock WWTPs, City of Dallas, Texas Principal-in-Charge. Denis provided oversight for design of anaerobic digestion, thickening and dewatering facilities; a digester-gas-fueled engine cogeneration facility; maintenance facilities; and the 140-mgd WWTPs. Trinity River Authority WWTP, Grand Prairie, Texas Principal-in-Charge. Denis supervised the designed and construction management for anaerobic digestion and digester gas-fueled engine cogeneration facilities at this 50-mgd WWTP. 201 Facilities Plan, Fort Smith, Arkansas Project Manager. Existing facilities included a 10-mgd activated sludge plant and a 10-mgd trickling filter plant. Denis’ duties included creating the facilities plan and assisting during design, interim operations and construction for modifications to both plants. Denis also provided expert witness testimony related to a consent decree from the USEPA. WWTP, Selma-Kingsburg-Fowler County Sanitation District, California Project Engineer. Denis prepared the bid documents for a 10-mgd WWTP expansion. This project was unique in that it was bid on a total life cycle basis and was the first WWTP in California to employ dome-style fine bubble diffusers. Laguna WWTP Expansion, City of Santa Rosa, California Project Engineer. Denis designed the activated sludge system and the multifuel cogeneration system that used IC engines driving positive displacement blowers for a 15-mgd WWTP expansion. Wastewater Treatment Facilities Plan, City of Los Banos, California Project Manager. Denis prepared the facilities plan for the expansion of the sewage collection, treatment and disposal system. The treatment process used lagoons, a process pioneered in California by Dr. Caldwell June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1195 Hazardous Materials Management Confidential Clients, Texas and California Project Engineer. Denis completed investigations, assessments, removals and remediation programs for underground storage tanks. Confidential Industrial Clients, Texas and Arkansas Project Engineer. Denis completed investigation, assessment and closure of surface impoundments and buried tanks at several sites. United Parcel Service, Houston, Texas Project Engineer. Denis developed spill prevention control and countermeasures (SPCC) plans for five distribution facilities. Risk Management Throughout his career, he has addressed issues associated with the use of gaseous and liquid chemicals used in water and wastewater treatment plants. He completed training by the AIChE on "The Use of Hazard and Operability (HAZOP) Studies in Process Analysis," which included consideration of the OSHA Process Safety Management (PSM) Standard (20 CFR 1910.119). As project manager, he prepared Risk Management and Prevention Programs (RMPP, California requirement prior to 1998), Risk Management Plans (RMP), and Process Safety Management Plans (PSM Plans to achieve compliance with the PSM Standard), and assisted clients in developing strategies for working with administering agencies: His experience in conducting Process Hazard Analyses (PHA), including both checklists and Hazard and Operability (HAZOP) Studies, is demonstrated by the following projects for which he was the PHA facilitator as well as the project manager. For several projects, he also completed a PSM Plan.  RMPP and PSM Plan, Contra Costa Water District's Randall-Bold Water Treatment Plant (RBWTP), chlorine, Contra Costa County, California.  RMPP and PSM Plan, Delta Diablo Sanitation District's Antioch facilities, chlorine and sulfur dioxide, Contra Costa County, California.  RMPP, Benicia Water Treatment Plant, chlorine; Solano County, California  RMPP, Benicia Wastewater Treatment Plant, chlorine and sulfur dioxide; Solano County, California.  RMP, City of Antioch’s Water Treatment Plant, chlorine and ammonia, Contra Costa County, California.  RMP, City of Lompoc Water Treatment Plant, chlorine, five-year update, Santa Barbara County, California.  RMP, City of Benicia's Water Treatment Plant, chlorine, Solano County, California.  RMP, Confidential Industrial Client, ammonia, Stanislaus County, California.  RMP, Confidential Industrial Client, ammonia, Alameda County, California.  RMP, Confidential Industrial Client, ammonia, Chehalis, Washington.  RMP, UC Davis Medical Center Cogeneration Plant, aqueous ammonia, Sacramento County, California.  RMP (Draft), Lihue Wastewater Treatment Plant, chlorine, County of Kauai, Hawaii  RMP, Riverside Water Pollution Control Facility, chlorine, five-year update, Riverside California  RMP, Waikoloa Wastewater Treatment Plant, chlorine, conducted in response to EPA audit, County of Hawaii, Hawaii  RMP and PSM Plan Strategy, chlorine, for seven sites at MCLB, Barstow California Other Projects and Activities  Design review, Cutthroat Trout Fish Hatchery, Pyramid Lake Indian Tribal Enterprises, Nevada. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1196  Customer Service, Hyperion WWTP, Los Angeles, California.  Permit assistance for air quality, water, and wastewater facilities for private and public clients.  Assistant supervisor for engineering standards department . Developed and revised standard specifications and drawings.  Participated in program reviewing short-circuit and earthquake reaction of substation structures and transmission towers. Primary effort in this program involved developing mathematical computer models of structures in the substation and transmission system.  Served in U.S. Marine Corps for three years in various engineering activities. Memberships American Arbitration Association American Society of Civil Engineers American Water Works Association Association for the Advancement of Cost Engineering International Construction Management Association of America Dispute Resolution Board Foundation Project Management Institute Society of American Value Engineers International Water Environment Federation Publications/Presentations 1. “Dispute Resolution Boards: A Risk Management Tool,” presented at 2011 California Water Environment Association Annual Conference 2. “Quality in the Constructed Project, ASCE Manual 73, Third Edition.” contributing author, S. Williams, editor, 2011. 3. “Ethics in the Technological Enterprise - A Pragmatic Approach,” presented at the 2008 California Water Environment Association Northern Regional Training Conference 4. “Prequalification of Contractors, a Risk Management Tool,” with J. M. Teplin, presented at2006 California Water Environment Association Annual Conference 5. “Managing Construction and Post-Construction Monitoring of the East Mission Gorge Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation Project, San Diego, California,” with P. J. Barden, M. E. Conner, M. Busdosh, Ph.D., J.A. Shoaf. Water Environment Specialty Conference, 2001 A Collection Systems Odyssey: Integrating O&M and Wet Weather Solutions, 2001. 6. “Construction of the East Mission Gorge Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation Project, San Diego, California,” with P. J. Barden, M. E. Conner, M. L. Hale. Proceedings of the American Society of Civil Engineers Specialty Conference, Pipelines in the Constructed Environment. . 1998. 7. “Risk Management and Prevention Program (RMPP)/Accidental Release Program (ARP),” presented at 7th Annual California Statewide Community Awareness & Emergency Response (CAER) Conference, 1995. 8. “Odor Control Study, Benicia Wastewater Treatment Plant,” presented at the 1990 California Water Pollution Control Association Annual Conference. 9. “How Wastewater Treatment Plants Utilize Digester Gas,” Water/Engineering and Management. August 1987. 10. “Designing for Trickling Filter/Solids Contact Process Applications,” with R. C. Fedotoff, D. T. Merrill, M. C. R. Owen, and D. S. Parker, presented at the 1982 Water Pollution Control Federation Annual Conference, St. Louis, Missouri. 11. “Management of Submittals to Reduce Liability,” with L. B. Dunlap, Proceedings of the ASCE Conference on Reducing Risk and Liability Through Better Specifications and Inspection1981. 12. “Energy Recovery from Wastewater Treatment Plant Sludge,” with R. B. Sieger, Energy Conservation in the Design of Water Quality Control Facilities, Proceedings of the Fourth Mid-American Conference on Environmental Engineering Design. 1979. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1197 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1198 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1199 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1200 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1201 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1202 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1203 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1204 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1205 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1206 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1207 June 13, 2017Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors1208 June 13, 2017Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors1209 June 13, 2017Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors1210 June 13, 2017Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors1211 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1212 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1213 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1214 Stephanie Medley, J.D. El Sobrante, CA 94803 June 10, 2016 Contra Costa County CLERK OF THE BOARD 651 Pine Street, Rm. 106 Martinez, California 94553-1292 To Whom It May Concern: My skills, commitment, make me an ideal candidate for the County’s Racial Justice Task Force. Currently, I am the Youth Justice Director at RYSE Youth Center, in Richmond. In this position I have built reentry programming that focuses on the unique needs of youth and young adults involved in the criminal system. During my time at RYSE, I have cultivated relationships with critical County and city justice stakeholders such as Richmond Police Department, Probation, school administration, EHSD and others to formalize partnerships and implement programs and practices that are trauma informed and restorative. Additionally, I am the chair of the County’s AB109 Community Advisory Board (term ending in December) and sit on the steering committee for the Youth Justice Initiative. My present and past experience has given me extensive leadership opportunities, administrative experience, strengthened my multi-tasking abilities, and has helped me learn the importance of teamwork and open communication with partners. Additionally, growing up in Richmond has shown me the many obstacles that system-involved youth and adults face and my connection with the community will help me add new perspectives and ideas to the Racial Justice Task Force. RYSE asserts itself as a racial justice organization and this is reflected in all of our work by prioritizing and giving primacy to the needs of impoverished and young people of color. The tools and techniques I have learned from my work experience apply directly to the skills needed to be an effective member of the Racial Justice Task Force—speaking effectively, facilitating group discussion, developing rapport, organizing, meeting goals, managing groups, adept problem-solver able who works effectively both independently and as a member of formal and informal teams, and a commitment to trauma-informed practices and social justice. I welcome the opportunity to work with the County on this community-changing endeavor and thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Stephanie R. Medley June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1215 Stephanie Medley, J.D. El Sobrante, CA 94803 PROFESSIONAL SKILLS: ♦ Highly adept at community relations and collaborating/interfacing with decision-makers in government, law enforcement, and community agencies ♦ Effective mediator, conflict-solver, and communicator who understands the need to develop a culture that fosters respect ♦ Ability to identify and analyze issues to develop a framework for resolving them ♦ Ability to research issues thoroughly, write clearly and succinctly, and present complex information simply HIGLIGHTS OF PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: Management, Leadership & Community Relations ♦ Develop and implement innovative diversion based practices and reentry & reintegration supports for system-involved youth ♦ In collaboration with key community partners, support the development and coordination of culturally appropriate interventions and reentry supports for youth and young adults involved in the juvenile and criminal justice systems ♦ Instrumental in forming and strengthening cross-sector to encourage participation in the development of effective reentry system of care ♦ Developed informational guides to help probationers and parolees navigate their rights and re-integrate back into the community ♦ Supervised law clerks and paralegals to help hone their advocacy skills ♦ Organized campaign events; recruited, trained and mobilized volunteers ♦ Created student professional development activities by collaborating with university administration, law school faculty, and Bay Area attorneys to develop resume workshops, mock interviews, and networking opportunities Negotiation, Problem-solving & Advocacy ♦ Active in regional and statewide policy advocacy regarding juvenile record sealing procedures and procedures that create housing barriers for individuals with criminal records ♦ Represented disabled and low-income clients at Section 8 voucher termination hearings involving criminal activity and housing denials based on criminal history ♦ Successfully argued at hearing on Motion to Set Aside DNA evidence on an arson-homicide case in California Superior Court ♦ Researched and wrote legal memoranda on criminal law issues involving minor clients; drafted Petitions for juvenile Modification of Disposition ♦ Provided recommendations after reviewing and analyzing cases and interviewing sexual offenders at Division of Juvenile Justice Presentation & Facilitation ♦ Facilitate workshops that educate youth on rights regarding education justice and criminal law ♦ Present at city council, board of supervisor, and community meetings on topics including, reentry, restorative justice and realignment; facilitate community meetings on reentry, realignment, and community organizing PROFESSIONAL HISTORY: RYSE YOUTH CENTER, Youth Justice Director, Richmond, CA Oct. 2012 - Present BAY AREA LEGAL AID, Reentry Coordinator/Advocate, Contra Costa County Regional Office Aug. 2010 - Aug. 2012 OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY, Certified Legal Intern, San Francisco, CA Jan. 2008 - Dec. 2008 OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER, Law Clerk, San Leandro, CA June 2007 - Aug. 2007 EDUCATION: JOHN F. KENNEDY UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF LAW, Pleasant Hill, CA, J.D. May 2009 Honors: Articles Editor of John F. Kennedy Law Review; Member of JFK Moot Court Team Activities: President, JFK Black Law Students Association (elected 2 yrs.); Rep., JFK Law Student Association SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY, B.A., Political Science & American Studies (emphasis on Jurisprudence) May 2005 Activities: Vice-President, Students for Community Service June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1216 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1217 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1218 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1219 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1220 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1221 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1222 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1223 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1224 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1225 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1226 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1227 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1228 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1229 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1230 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1231 June 13, 2017Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors1232 June 13, 2017Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors1233 June 13, 2017Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors1234 June 13, 2017Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors1235 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1236 RECOMMENDATION(S): ACCEPT the resignation of Kalia Vidal, DECLARE a vacancy in the Private / Non-Profit Seat No. 3 on the Economic Opportunity Council, and DIRECT the Clerk of the Board to post the vacancies, as recommended by the Employment & Human Services Director. FISCAL IMPACT: None BACKGROUND: A vacancy was created in the Private/Non-Profit Seat No. 3 when Kalia Vidal, appointed to the seat on November 17, 2015 (c.18), submitted her resignation effective April 24, 2017. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If not approved, the Economic Opportunity will not be able to fill the vacancy. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: CSB (925) 681-6308 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Nancy Sparks, Christina Reich C. 17 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:DECLARE Vacant Private/Non-Profit Seat No.3 on the Economic Opportunity Council June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1237 AGENDA ATTACHMENTS MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Vacancy Notice June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1238 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1239 RECOMMENDATION(S): Employment and Human Services (0503)/Plant Acquisition (0111): APPROVE Appropriation Adjustment No. 5092 in the amount of $388,000 to transfer appropriations from EHSD to the Public Works Department for one capital project, as recommended by the Employment and Human Services Director. FISCAL IMPACT: EHSD General Assistance appropriations will be reduced by $388,000 and transfered to Public Works for Capital Projects. This consists of 100% County revenue and no additional County general fund costs will result from these adjustments. BACKGROUND: The Public Works Department has identified the need to upgrade for a repair/replacement of the roof at 151 Linus Pauling Drive in Hercules with an estimated cost of $388,000. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Appropriations will not be properly allocated. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: Not applicable. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Erik Brown, 925-313-1561 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 18 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:EHSD Capital Projects FY 16/17 #2 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1240 AGENDA ATTACHMENTS TC27_5092 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed: Appropriations & Adjustment No. 5092 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1241 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1242 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1243 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1244 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1245 RECOMMENDATION(S): Employment and Human Services (0503)/Plant Acquisition (0111): APPROVE FY 2016/17 Appropriation Adjustment No.5089 in the amount of $1,038,000 to transfer appropriations from EHSD to the Public Works Department for chiller replacement and roof repairs, as recommended by the Employment and Human Services Director. FISCAL IMPACT: EHSD County Aid appropriations will be reduced by $1,038,000 and transfer to Public Works for Capital Projects. This consists of 100% County revenue and no additional County general fund costs will result from these adjustments. BACKGROUND: The Public Works Department has identified the need to upgrade the three remaining HVAC units at 40 Douglas Drive for an estimated cost of $800,000. In addition, a repair/replacement of the roof at 40 Douglas Drive is also moving forward with an estimated cost of 238,000. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Appropriations will not be properly allocated. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: Not applicable. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Erik Brown, 925-313-1561 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 19 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:EHSD Capital Projects FY 16/17 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1246 ATTACHMENTS AIR 29935 APOO5089 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1247 June 13, 2017Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors1248 RECOMMENDATION(S): Employment and Human Services (0502): APPROVE Appropriation and Revenue Adjustment # 5091 to the Federal, State and County expenditure and revenue budgets based on revised caseload projections for Foster Care, KinGAP, Emergency Assistance Foster Care, and Adoptions Assistance programs. FISCAL IMPACT: This action will adjust both the expenditure and revenue budgets to more accurately reflect adjustments in caseload projections and increased costs per case for FY 16/17. The net effect is an increase to both revenues and expenditures of $1,761,277. The increased county share of $789,600 is included as part of the $1,761,277 net adjustment and is being covered with local revenue. BACKGROUND: Children and Family Services Bureau is currently experiencing expenditure budget overages in Emergency Assistance Foster Care (EA Foster Care), Kinship Guardian Assistance Payment (KinGAP), Foster Care and Adoptions Assistance as expenditures and revenue continue to increase. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Appropriations will not be properly allocated. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Laura Volante, 925-313-1545 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 20 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:Children and Family Services Bureau Appropriation Adjustments June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1249 CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: Not applicable. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS AIR 29936 APOO 5091 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed: Appropriation&Adjustment No. 5091 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1250 June 13, 2017Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors1251 June 13, 2017Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors1252 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1253 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1254 RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT an "Oppose" position on AB 1250 (Sawyer-Jones): Counties and Cities: Personal Services Contracts, as amended on May 30, 2017, a bill that would impose restrictive specific standards for the use of personal services contracts by counties and restrict the ability of counties to contract out for services. FISCAL IMPACT: According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee, this bill has unknown costs to local agencies to comply with the provisions of this bill. Costs would depend on how often affected cities and counties utilize these contracts, and these costs are not likely to be reimbursable. BACKGROUND: AB 1250 (Jones-Sawyer) is opposed by the California State Association of Counties (CSAC), Urban Counties Caucus (UCC) and Rural County Representatives of California (RCRC) (floor alert attached). AB 1250 was successful in passing off the Assembly Floor. Just hours before the session closed for the house of origin deadline, the author pledged to exempt cities from the onerous provisions of the bill. AB 1250 is expected to be amended to apply ONLY to counties as it heads to the Senate. Due to the urgency of requests for County advocacy to oppose the bill, a letter has been sent from Chair Federal Glover (attached). The County's legislative advocacy protocols require that action from the full Board of Supervisors on bills of particular interest to the County follow action by the Chair at the next available Board meeting, to establish the County's official position on a bill. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: L. DeLaney, 925-335-1097 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: C. 21 To:Board of Supervisors From:David Twa, County Administrator Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:AB 1250 (Jones-Sawyer): Counties and Cities: Personal Services Contracts--OPPOSE June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1255 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) 2017 CA A 1250: Bill Analysis - 05/30/2017 - Assembly Floor ASSEMBLY THIRD READING AB 1250 (Jones-Sawyer) As Amended Ver:May 30, 2017 Majority vote Committee Votes Ayes Noes Public Employees 3-3 Rodriguez, Travis Allen, Cooper, Gallagher, O'Donnell Cooley Public Employees 4-1 Rodriguez, Travis Allen Bonta, Cooper, O'Donnell Appropriations 9-5 Gonzalez Bigelow, Brough, Fletcher, Bloom, Fong, Gallagher, Bocanegra, Obernolte Bonta, Calderon, McCarty, Quirk, Eduardo Garcia, Reyes SUMMARY: Establishes standards for the use of personal service contracts by counties and cities. Specifically, this bill: 1) Authorizes a county, county agency, city, or city agency to contract for personal services currently or customarily performed by county or city employees when the following conditions are met: a) The board of supervisors, county agency, city council, or city agency clearly demonstrate that the proposed contract will result in actual cost savings to the county or city for the duration of the contract as compared with the county's actual costs of providing the same services, provided that, in comparing costs: i) The additional cost of providing the same service as proposed by the contract to be included, and specifies that the required costs to be included are the salaries and benefits of additional staff, space, equipment, and materials needed to perform the function. ii) Indirect overhead costs are not to be included, and defines "indirect overhead costs" to mean the pro rata share of existing administrative salaries and benefits, rent, equipment costs, utilities, and materials. iii) Requires the cost of a contractor providing a service that would be directly associated with the contracted function to be included, and specifies such costs to include, but not limited to, those for inspection, supervision and monitoring. b) Requires that proposals to contract out work must not be approved solely on the basis that savings would result from lower contractor pay rates or benefits, and that proposals must be eligible for approval if the contractor's wages are at the industry's level and do not significantly undercut county or city pay rates. c) The contract does not cause the displacement of county or city employees, and specifies "displacement" to include layoff, demotion, involuntary transfer to a new location requiring a change of residence, and time base reductions, and not include changes in shifts, days off, reassignment to other positions within the same class, and general location. d) The contract does not cause vacant positions in county or city employment to remain unfilled, and does not adversely affect the county's nondiscrimination, affirmative action efforts. e) The savings must be large enough to ensure against their elimination by private sector and county or city cost fluctuations that could normally be expected during the contracting period, and the savings clearly justify the size and duration of the contracting agreement. f) The contract is awarded through a publicized, competitive building process, while granting the county's or city's right to reject bids or proposals, and that the contract includes specific provisions related to the qualifications of the staff that will perform the work under the contract, and assurance as to the contractor's hiring practices related to nondiscrimination, affirmative action standards. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1256 g) The potential for future economic risk is minimal in relation to rate increases by the potential contractor, and that the contract is with a firm, and defines "firm" to mean a corporation, partnership, nonprofit organization, or sole proprietorship. h) The potential economic advantage of contracting is not outweighed by the public's interest in having a particular function performed directly by county or city government. i) The contract must include provisions for termination at any time by the county or city without penalty if there is a material breach, and that notice is provided at least 30 days prior to termination. j) The contract must provide that the county or city is entitled to receive records related to the performance of the contractor or subcontractor, and that in addition to other records requested by the city or county, the contractor must furnish each month, the following information for those providing services under the contract: (i) the names of subcontractors, (ii) the names of employees of the contractor and subcontractor and their hourly rates of pay, and (iii) the names of any workers who are independent contractors and the compensation rates for those workers. Specifies that the contract must provide that all records provided to the city or county by the contractor are subject to the California Public Records Act, and that contractors must maintain records related to performance of the contract that ordinarily would be maintained by the county or city performing the same functions. k) The county or city must include in the contract specific and measureable performance standards, and provisions for audit for purposes of ensuring that performance standards are met, and compliance with applicable laws and regulations. Prohibits counties and cities from renewing or extending the contract prior to receiving and considering the audit report, and permits them to adopt more restrictive rules related to contracting of public services. Provides that the costs of the audit are to be reimbursed to the county or city by the contractor, and prohibits the contractor from factoring the costs of the audit into its contract costs. 2) Provides that, in the absence of meeting the specified requirements, contracting for personal services is permitted under limited circumstances, including a contract between a county or city and other government entity for services to be performed by employees of the other government entity. 3) Specifies that these provisions apply to all counties and cities that have adopted a merit or civil service system, and exempts contracts for: a) Public transit services, if they are fully funded by Federal Transit Administration (FTA) assistance and the county or city is subject to guidelines issued by the FTA. b) Private architects, engineering, land surveying, construction management firms, and public works projects. c) Street sweeping services, or authorized solid waste handling services provided by means of nonexclusive franchise, partially exclusive or wholly exclusive franchise, contract, license, permit, or other, including with or without competitive bid. i) Defines "solid waste handling services" to mean the collection, transportation, storage, transfer, conversion, processing, recycling, composting, or disposal of solid waste. 4) Exempts contracts by cities that renew existing contracts or award of contracts to perform the same services to other contractors, where the contract will not cause the displacement of city employees, nor reduce the number of employee positions. 5) Specifies that these provisions are not to be construed to authorize or permit the contracting out of fire protection services, other than contracts between public agencies that are explicitly authorized. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1257 6) Provides that these provisions do not apply to a charter city, but do apply to a charter county. 7) Makes its provisions severable if this measure's application or any of its provisions are held to be invalid. 8) Provides that if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the measure contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to local agencies and school districts are required. EXISTING LAW: 1) Authorizes a county board of supervisors to contract for special services on behalf of the county, county officers or departments, and district courts in the county, and requires that the contract be with persons specially trained, experienced, and have expertise and competence to perform the special services, among other provisions. Requires that special services consist of services, advice, education or training for financial, economic, accounting (including the preparation and issuance of payroll checks or warrants), engineering, legal, medical, therapeutic, administrative, architectural, airport or building security matters, laundry services, or linen services. Additional special services may include maintenance or custodial matters if the board finds that the site is remote from available county employees, and contracting better serves the county's economic interests, among other provisions. 2) Authorizes cities to contract with any specially trained and experienced person, firm or corporation for special services and advice in financial, economic, accounting, engineering, legal, or administrative matters. 3) Authorizes the legislative body of any public or municipal corporation to contract with, and employ any persons for district special services and advice in financial, economic, accounting, engineering, legal, or administrative matters if such persons are specially trained, experienced and competent to perform the special services required, among other provisions. 4) Authorizes the state, school districts and community college districts to enter into personal services contracts, and establishes the conditions that must be met when procuring such contracts. 5) Authorizes the board of trustees, common council, or other legislative body of a city or the board of trustees of a library district in which a withdrawal from the county free library system becomes effective on or after January 1, 2012, must comply with specified conditions prior to entering into a contract to operate the city's or district's library or libraries with a private contractor that will employ library staff. FISCAL EFFECT: According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee, this bill has unknown costs to local agencies to comply with the provisions of this bill. Costs would depend on how often affected cities and counties utilize these contracts, and these costs are not likely to be reimbursable. COMMENTS: Please see the policy committee analysis for a full discussion of this bill. Prior legislation: AB 583 (Gomez), Chapter 196, Statutes of 2013 AB 438 (Williams), Chapter 611, Statutes of 2011 SB 906 (Alarcon) of 2003, failed passage by the Assembly SB 1419 (Alarcon), Chapter 894, Statutes of 2002 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1258 Analysis Prepared by: Michael Bolden / P.E.,R., & S.S. / (916) 319-3957 FN: 0000924 CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The County would not have an official position on this bill from which to advocate. ATTACHMENTS AB 1250 Oppose Letter from Chair AB 1250 Assembly Floor Alert June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1259 The Board of Supervisors County Administration Building 651 Pine Street, Room 106 Martinez, California 94553 John Gioia, 1st District Candace Andersen, 2nd District Diane Burgis, 3rd District Karen Mitchoff, 4th District Federal D. Glover, 5th District May 31, 2017 The Honorable Reginald Byron Jones-Sawyer, Sr. State Capitol, Room 2117 Sacramento, CA 95814 RE: AB 1250 (Jones-Sawyer) Counties and cities: Contracts for personal services - OPPOSE Dear Assembly Member Jones-Sawyer: As Chair of the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, I write to join the California State Association of Counties (CSAC) and the Urban Counties of California (UCC) to regretfully express opposition to AB 1250. AB 1250 significantly interferes with the ability of counties to enter into personal services contracts and creates additional workload for county staff. The additional hurdles will increase costs and reduce opportunities to meet service delivery needs in the most cost-effective manner. The numerous amendments fail to address the fundamental problems with the bill. Its inconsistent and onerous requirements interfere with the ability for counties to successfully administer programs which are vital to their residents. Furthermore, AB 1250 impacts the renewal of existing contracts and subjects private employer information to the California Public Records Act, which not only creates additional workload but opens the door to litigation over personal privacy violations. For all these reasons, I urge you to work with CSAC and UCC to address the above issues. Sincerely, FEDERAL D. GLOVER Chair, Board of Supervisors cc: Contra Costa County Legislative Delegation Members, Board of Supervisors David Twa, County Administrator David Twa Clerk of the Board and County Administrator (925) 335-1900 Contra Costa County June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1260 * * * ASSEMBLY FLOOR ALERT * * * Assembly Bill 1250 (Jones-Sawyer) “NO” VOTE REQUESTED Hinders Non-Profit Contracts that Serve the Most Vulnerable Assembly Third Reading File #85 The California State Association of Counties (CSAC) opposes AB 1250 and urges your NO vote on this de facto prohibition on contracted services. The measure will hinder services provided to the most vulnerable Californians by non-profit organizations in our 58 counties. Impacted Contractors Include Non-Profit Service Providers AB 1250 creates onerous new burdens on contracting firms that are defined as “a corporation, partnership, non-profit organization, or sole proprietorship.” The significant hurdles imposed by AB 1250, including paying for an annual audit, would deter or prevent non-profit organizations from entering into contracts with counties and limit service options and availability. What Critical Services? Non-profits provide a wide array of services in partnership with counties. This includes warming and cooling centers, child abuse and neglect counselors, health specialists, senior services, and services for people experiencing homelessness. Emergency medical care and pre-hospital transport services would also be subject to AB 1250. Current Contracts Are Impacted AB 1250 applies to contracted services that are currently or customarily performed by any city or county. It includes county contracts beginning after January 2018 as well as renewals and extensions of existing contracts. Counties cannot extend an established, existing contract without completing a comprehensive audit, based on specific factors. That audit is to be paid for by the nonprofit organization or firm and the costs cannot be passed onto the county. Burden on Contracted Service Providers Still Hurts Bottom Line Simply shifting requirements and costs from the county to the contracted service provider still hurts the bottom line – the opportunity for counties to use taxpayer dollars efficiently and to serve the needs of their residents. AB 1250 won’t equate to services being provided by local agency employees. It means counties will offer fewer services if they can still be offered at all. If you have any questions about our request for a NO vote please contact Dorothy Johnson, Legislative Representative, at (916) 650-8133. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1261 RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 22098 to add one (1) permanent full-time Licensed Vocational Nurse (VT7G) position at salary grade TAX-1287 ($4,129-$5,273) in the Health Services Department. (Represented) FISCAL IMPACT: Upon approval, this action has an annual cost of approximately $107,950 with an estimated pension cost of $22,463 already included. BACKGROUND: Contra Costa Health Plan’s Advice Nurse unit (AN) is requesting to add one Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) position to meet its accreditation call answer standards, and to assist in handling non-clinical calls in order to decrease the number of non-medical calls being answered by the unit and assist with member follow-up calls and lab calls as well as providers. In order to assist in decreasing the non-clinical calls to the AN queue, the AN unit will be giving patients the option to leave a message for non-clinical questions which will reduce the volume of calls to the AN unit. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Shelanda Adams, 925-957-5263 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Rolanda Hartfield, Deputy cc: C. 22 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:Add one Licensed Vocational Nurse position in the Health Services Department. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1262 CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this action is not approved, the Advice Nurse Unit in Contra Costa Health Plan will not have adequate staffing to meet the demand and volume of patient care services. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS P300 No. 22098 HSD MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed P300 No. 22098 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1263 POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST NO. 22098 DATE 5/12/2017 Department No./ Department Health Services Budget Unit No. 0860 Org No. 6119 Agency No. A18 Action Requested: Add one (1) full-time Licensed Vocational Nurse (VT7G) position in the Health Services Department. Proposed Effective Date: 6/14/2017 Classification Questionnaire attached: Yes No / Cost is within Department’s budget: Yes No Total One-Time Costs (non-salary) associated with request: $0.00 Estimated total cost adjustment (salary / benefits / one time): Total annual cost $107,950.25 Net County Cost $0.00 Total this FY $8,995.85 N.C.C. this FY $0.00 SOURCE OF FUNDING TO OFFSET ADJUSTMENT 100% CCHP member fees Department must initiate necessary adjustment and submit to CAO. Use additional sheet for further explanations or comments. Jo-Anne Linares ______________________________________ (for) Department Head REVIEWED BY CAO AND RELEASED TO HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT Enid Mendoza 6/7/2017 ___________________________________ ________________ Deputy County Administrator Date HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS DATE Exempt from Human Resources review under delegated authority. Amend Resolution 71/17 establishing positions and resolutions allocating classes to the Basic / Exempt salary schedule. Effective: Day following Board Action. (Date) ___________________________________ ________________ (for) Director of Human Resources Date COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION: DATE 6/7/2017 Approve Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Disapprove Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Enid Mendoza Other: Approve as recommended by the Department. ___________________________________ (for) County Administrator BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION: David J. Twa, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment is APPROVED DISAPPROVED and County Administrator DATE BY APPROVAL OF THIS ADJUSTMENT CONSTITUTES A PERSONNEL / SALARY RESOLUTION AMENDMENT POSITION ADJUSTMENT ACTION TO BE COMPLETED BY HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT FOLLOWING BOARD ACTION Adjust class(es) / position(s) as follows: P300 (M347) Rev 3/15/01 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1264 REQUEST FOR PROJECT POSITIONS Department Date 6/7/2017 No. xxxxxx 1. Project Positions Requested: 2. Explain Specific Duties of Position(s) 3. Name / Purpose of Project and Funding Source (do not use acronyms i.e. SB40 Project or SDSS Funds) 4. Duration of the Project: Start Date End Date Is funding for a specified period of time (i.e. 2 years) or on a year-to-year basis? Please explain. 5. Project Annual Cost a. Salary & Benefits Costs: b. Support Costs: (services, supplies, equipment, etc.) c. Less revenue or expenditure: d. Net cost to General or other fund: 6. Briefly explain the consequences of not filling the project position(s) in terms of: a. potential future costs d. political implications b. legal implications e. organizational implications c. financial implications 7. Briefly describe the alternative approaches to delivering the services which you have considered. Indicate why these alternatives were not chosen. 8. Departments requesting new project positions must submit an updated cost benefit analysis of each project position at the halfway point of the project duration. This report is to be submitted to the Human Resources Department, which will forward the report to the Board of Supervisors. Indicate the date that your cost / benefit analysis will be submitted 9. How will the project position(s) be filled? a. Competitive examination(s) b. Existing employment list(s) Which one(s)? c. Direct appointment of: 1. Merit System employee who will be placed on leave from current job 2. Non-County employee Provide a justification if filling position(s) by C1 or C2 USE ADDITIONAL PAPER IF NECESSARY June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1265 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1266 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1267 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Agricultural Commissioner, or designee, to execute Agreement #17-0110-000=SA Certified Farmers Market Inspections in an amount not to exceed $18,564 from California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA) to provide enforcement through market and production site inspections and certifications for the period July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018. FISCAL IMPACT: This agreement will reimburse the department for expenses not to exceed $18,564 for the period July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018. This amount has been anticipated in the FY17/18 budget. There are no county matching of funds. BACKGROUND: The County agrees to provide market and production site inspections for the Certified Farmers Market (CFM) Program. These services are in addition to the normal inspection activities being performed by the County and those required under statute. Services provide under this agreement should be consistent with normal inspection procedures currently performed by the County. Inspection hours and workdays should vary where appropriate and practical. The County shall provide necessary inspection supplies, and equipment, with the exception of forms and supplies routinely provided by the California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA). Inspections shall be performed as outlined in the Food and Agriculture Code. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: 646-5250 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Rolanda Hartfield, Deputy cc: C. 23 To:Board of Supervisors From:Matt Slattengren Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:17-0110-000-SA Certified Farmers Market Inspections June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1268 CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: A negative action would result in the department not having the revenue necessary to perform inspection and certification activities on behalf of the California Department of Food and Agriculture and will lose overhead that is a benefit to the department's budget. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1269 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Sheriff-Coroner, or designee, to execute a contract with the Contra Costa Community College District, including mutual indemnification, to pay the County an amount not to exceed $40,000 to provide police dispatching services for the period June 1, 2017 through May 31, 2022. FISCAL IMPACT: No net County cost. $40,000 revenue over five years. BACKGROUND: The Office of the Sheriff will provide police dispatching services, limited to law enforcement activity for the Contra Costa Community College District. Services will include dispatching, call-taking, sending and receiving voice and data traffic, answering emergency (911) calls and warrent checks to aid the College District's Police Department. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Failure to approve this contract will result in the inability of the Sheriff's Office to provide the Contra Costa Community College District with adequate 911 Dispatcher Services resulting in a safety concern for the community, reduced revenue for the Office of the Sheriff and the County General Fund. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Sandra Brown 925-335-1553 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Rolanda Hartfield, Deputy cc: C. 24 To:Board of Supervisors From:David O. Livingston, Sheriff-Coroner Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:Dispatch Services for Contra Costa Community College District June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1270 CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: None. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1271 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the County Librarian, or designee, to apply for and accept a grant in the amount of $5,475 from Fremont Bank Foundation to provide qualified adult learners in Contra Costa County with an accredited online high school degree and career training opportunity, for the period June 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018. FISCAL IMPACT: No Library Fund match. BACKGROUND: During the 2016/2017 fiscal year, the Library, in partnership with the California State Library and Gale, part of Cengage Learning, offered ten adults the opportunity to earn both an accredited high school diploma and career credential through Career Online High School (COHS). COHS is a nationally accredited educational program offered by Gale. The goal of COHS is to bring non-traditional and/or adult learners back into the educational system and prepare them for jobs in growing sectors of the local economy. Students graduate with the tools they need to take the next step in their careers or advanced education. Currently, 38 libraries in California are using Career Online High School, including, in the East Bay, Richmond Public Library, Alameda County Library, Berkeley Public Library and Hayward Public Library. Of the 38 programs, 36 of the participating libraries received support from the California State Library in order to implement it. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: W. Beveridge 925-608-7730 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Rolanda Hartfield, Deputy cc: C. 25 To:Board of Supervisors From:Melinda Cervantes, County Librarian Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:Library Grant in the amount of $5475 from Fremont Bank Foundation June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1272 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) If funded, this grant will allow the Library to enroll five more adults in COHS. Each enrollment is valued at $1,095, for a total of $5,475, and will be paid for from grant funds. The Contra Costa County Library will provide access to COHS via Adult Literacy library staff housed at the Pittsburg Library. Based on outcomes from libraries already participating in the program, this educational approach appears to be having a significantly more positive effect on both the participants and the community at large than is estimated would occur for these adult learners through a traditional GED program. Research shows that persons with high school diplomas end up earning an average of about $1500 per month more than persons with GEDs. Also, 73 percent of students who received a high school diploma went on to complete at least some post-secondary education, while less than half (43 percent) of GED certificate recipients did so. Furthermore, only 5 percent earned a bachelor’s degree or higher. In contrast, of high school diploma holders, 33 percent earned this level of education. The program is expected to have a positive impact on the local economy. Because students can also obtain a career credential in addition to a diploma, the program should also introduce more skilled graduates to the local workforce. Prospective students wishing to be considered for admittance to the program must complete an online self-assessment and a two-week prerequisite course designed by COHS to determine if they will be successful. Students are then required to be interviewed by Adult Literacy library staff to determine their overall capability to complete the program. Those persons that complete both steps in the application process will be eligible to enroll in the program. In 2016/2017 FY the Library enrolled ten students on a "first come, first served" basis. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If the proposal is not approved, the Library will not be able to offer and provide access to Career Online High School to qualified county residents/adult learners. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1273 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment & Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with California Department of Community Services and Development, effective May 1, 2017, to extend the term through September 30, 2017 with no change to the payment limit of $115,014 for Department of Energy Weatherization Assistance Program services to Contra Costa County residents. FISCAL IMPACT: 100% State funds California Department of Community Services and Development County match: $0 State: 16C-6005, Amend 2 / CCC: 39-800-19 BACKGROUND: Contra Costa County has received funding from the State Department of Community Services and Development for 22 years wherein the County provides energy bill assistance payments and weatherization services to County residents who are income-eligible to receive said services. The funding sources include Low Income Home APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: CSB, 925-681-6381 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Rolanda Hartfield, Deputy cc: Sam Mendoza, Sung Kim, Cassandra Youngblood C. 26 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:2016-17 Departmentof Energy Weatherization Assistance Program (DOE WAP), Amend 2 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1274 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP), the Energy Crisis Intervention Program (ECIP), and the Department of Energy (DOE). The County receives the money via the Employment & Human Services Department (EHSD). EHSD, in turn, partners with the county Department of Conservation and Development to provide energy saving home improvements to low-income families throughout unincorporated Contra Costa County, as well as the County’s nineteen cities. The energy savings measures may provide homes with hot water heaters, furnaces, refrigerators, microwaves, doors, windows, fluorescent light bulbs, weather stripping, ceiling fans, and attic insulation. Homes receive a blower door test (a diagnostic tool to locate and correct air infiltration), and homes with gas appliances receive a combustion appliance safety test that checks for carbon monoxide gas leakage. Homes with gas appliances are provided with a carbon monoxide alarm. The program uses income based eligibility. The income levels are based on the Federal Fiscal Year 2016 Poverty Guidelines. Once eligibility is determined, clients with no hot water, no heat, or are in danger of having their power shut off are served as emergencies. Service is then based on clients with the lowest income, highest energy burden and families with at least one resident who is considered vulnerable population. The board approved receipt of funds on June 7, 2016 (c.35); the State routinely amends these contracts to extend the term to allow services to be fully expended. The board approved a contract amendment on February 14, 2017 (c.35) to extend from term end date to June 30, 2017. This amendment is to further extend the term end to September 30, 2017. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If not approved, County may not receive funding to continue operating the weatherization program through September 30, 2017. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: The Employment & Human Services Department, Community Services Bureau energy program supports one Contra Costa County community outcome - Outcome #4: "Families that are Safe, Stable and Nurturing." This outcome is supported by the provision of home energy assistance to keep households warm in winter and to increase household energy efficiency. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1275 RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2017/213 approving and authorizing the District Attorney, or designee, to execute a contract, including any extensions or amendments thereof pursuant to state guidelines, with the California Victim Witness Compensation and Government Claims Board in an amount not to exceed $298,368 to fund a Victim Witness Assistance Program Specialist position for the period July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2019. FISCAL IMPACT: The District Attorney will receive $298,368 in revenue. 100% State funded. BACKGROUND: The Victim Compensation and Government Claims Board (Board) administers the State's Victim Compensation Program (VCP), which reimburses victims of violent crimes for specific economic losses incurred as a result of crime. The Board, through Criminal Restitution Compacts, funds a Victim/Witness Program Specialist Position that provides a restitution specialist who APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Cherie Mathisen 925-957-2234 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 27 To:Board of Supervisors From:Mark Peterson, District Attorney Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:Victim Compensation and Government Claims Board Funding for 7/1/17 - 6/30/19 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1276 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) works with the victim, the prosecutor, the Probation Department and the Court to ensure that offenders are ordered to pay restitution to the victim and the program when appropriate. Statute requires the Court to impose restitution on behalf of the Board when an offender is convicted and the victim has received benefits from the VCP. If the victim's losses are unknown at the time of sentencing, statue requires that the restitution order include a provision that the amount will be determined at the direction of the court. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The District Attorney will be unable to apply for and accept the grant. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: No impact. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2017/213 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed: Resolution No. 2017/213 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1277 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 06/13/2017 by the following vote: AYE: John Gioia Candace Andersen Diane Burgis Karen Mitchoff Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2017/213 Victim Compensation and Government Claims Board Grant Award for FY 2017/19. WHEREAS the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors desires to enter into an agreement with the Victim Compensation and Government Claims Board (VCGCB) to continue the program to ensure restitution fines and orders are properly administered in accordance with applicable statues to provide restitution to victims of crimes. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the District Attorney of the County of Contra Costa is authorized to submit the attached agreement to the VCGCB and is authorized to execute on behalf of the Board of Supervisors the Standard Agreement including any extensions or amendments thereof. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the grant funds received hereunder shall not be used to supplant expenditures previously authorized or controlled by this body. Contact: Cherie Mathisen 925-957-2234 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: 5 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1278 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1279 RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve and authorize the Health Services Director, or his designee, to execute Grant Agreement #28-892-1 from Dean and Margarent Lesher Foundation, to pay the County, an amount not to exceed $74,000, for the County’s Pittsburg Food Access Assessment, for the period July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2019. FISCAL IMPACT: Acceptance of this Agreement will result in up to $74,000 for the Pittsburg Food Access Assessment. (No County match) BACKGROUND: This project is a part of Healthy & Livable Pittsburg Collaborative (HLPC). HLPC is a multi-sectoral, community group that has met since 2013 to promote healthy eating and active living within the Pittsburg community. The neighborhoods in the City of Pittsburg are drastically underserved by traditional food outlets such as grocery stores. Approval of Grant Agreement #28-892-1 will allow the Department to continue Pittsburg Food Access Assessment in the City of Pittsburg, with particular attention to families and children living in the low income area north of Highway 4, including providing professional development opportunities to Pittsburg youth and engage them in improving their community, through June 30, 2019. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Dan Peddycord, 925-313-6712 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Rolanda Hartfield, Deputy cc: D Morgan, M Wilhelm C. 28 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:Agreement #28-892-1 with Dean and Margaret Lesher Foundation June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1280 CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this grant is not approved, County will not receive funds to continue the Pittsburg Food Access Assessment program in Pittsburg. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1281 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Department Director, or designee, to execute a contract with the California Department of Education in an amount not to exceed $9,081,851, to provide State Preschool services, for the period July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018. FISCAL IMPACT: County to receive up to $9,081,851: State 83.68% ($7,599,360); Federal 16.32% ($1,482,491) No County match. CFDA #s 93.596 ($1,015,897) and 93.575 ($466,594). State Agreement CSPP 7050 / CCC Agreement 39-908-22 BACKGROUND: The California Department of Education notified the Department on May 31, 2017 of the 2017-2018 funding allocation of the California State Preschool program services. The County receives funds from the California Department of Education to provide state preschool services to program eligible County residents. The program is operated by the Employment and Human Services Department, Community Services Bureau. Approval of this board order will allow the continued provision of these childcare services. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: CSB (925) 681-6333 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Rolanda Hartfield, Deputy cc: Ressie Dayco, Cassandra Youngblood C. 29 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:2017-18 California Department of Education Preschool Program revenue contract June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1282 CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If not approved, County will not receive funding to operate these childcare programs. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: The Employment and Human Services Department, Community Services Bureau supports three of the community outcomes established in the Children's Report Card: 1) "Children Ready for and Succeeding in School"; 3) "Families that are Economically Self-sufficient"; and, 4) "Families that are Safe, Stable, and Nurturing" by offering comprehensive services, including high quality early childhood education, nutrition, and health services to low-income children throughout Contra Costa County. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1283 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Conservation and Development Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with First Carbon Solutions, to increase the payment limit by $70,668 to a new payment limit of $475,092 to complete the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Tassajara Parks Project in the Tassajara Parks / San Ramon area, with no change to the original term ending on September 9, 2018. FISCAL IMPACT: No impact. The applicant is responsible for paying the costs of the additional work to complete the Final EIR for the project. BACKGROUND: The Department of Conservation and Development contracted with First Carbon Solutions in September of 2014 to prepare an environmental impact report (EIR) for the Tassajara Parks Project. The Project involves the construction of a 125 unit residential subdivision with substantial dedication of park land in the Tassajara Valley / San Ramon area. The County released a Draft EIR (DEIR) in May of 2016 for a 45-day comment period. During the comment period substantial new information arose regarding the Water Supply Evaluation upon which the DEIR relied for analysis. As a result of the new information on September 29, 2016, the County released a Recirculated Draft EIR APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: John Oborne, 925-674-7793 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Rolanda Hartfield, Deputy cc: C. 30 To:Board of Supervisors From:John Kopchik, Director, Conservation & Development Department Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:Tassajara Parks EIR Contract Amendment June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1284 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) (R-DEIR) as required by law under circumstances when substantial new information regarding the project is added to the EIR after public notice availability of the DEIR and before certification. As a result of the volume and complexity of the comments received on the R-DEIR First Carbon Solutions has identified additional tasks to complete the comment matrix for the DEIR, R-DEIR and prepare additional water demand calculations. The increased payment limits is necessary to cover this additional work. This is the fifth budget amendment. There is no change to the term of the contract which is valid until September 9, 2018. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If the Board does not approve the EIR contract amendment, there would not be sufficient funds for First Carbon Solutions to complete the EIR. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1285 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with STAND! For Families Free of Violence, a non-profit corporation in an amount not to exceed $182,281 to provide Child Welfare Redesign Differential Response Path 2 Case Management services in East Contra Costa County for the period of July 1, 2017 through June 20, 2018. (100% State) FISCAL IMPACT: $182,281.00: 100% State (Child Welfare Services Outcome Improvement Project-Realignment Funds) BACKGROUND: This Contractor was selected as a result of the competitive bid process to continue implementation of the Differential Response Path 2 Case Management Program which provides early intervention in the lives of families who have had a report of abuse or neglect. The Differential Response Program works with community-based and/or faith-based organizations to provide case management and home visiting services to high risk families to address the issues that brought the family to the attention of Children and Family Services (CFS). Selected contractors provide services to impact the family's ability to safely care for their children and avoid the further need for interaction with and further investigation by CFS. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Gina Chenoweth 3-1648 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Rolanda Hartfield, Deputy cc: C. 31 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract with STAND! For Families Free of Violence for Differential Response Program Case Managment Services June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1286 CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Employment and Human Services will be unable to provide valuable services. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: The services provided under this contract support all five of Contra Costa County’s community outcomes: (1) "Children Ready for and Succeeding in School"; (2) "Children and Youth Healthy and Preparing for Productive Adulthood"; (3)"Families that are Economically Self-Sufficient"; (4) "Families that are Safe, Stable and Nurturing"; and (5)"Communities that are Safe and Provide a High Quality of Life for Children and Families” by providing community-based services to families to deter continued Children and Family Services intervention. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1287 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Delta Personnel Services, Inc, dba Guardian Security Agency in an amount not to exceed $357,110 to provide security guard service for the period July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018. FISCAL IMPACT: $357,110: $140,000 Employment and Human Services Administrative Overhead; $217,110 Community Services Bureau (4% County, 49% State, 47% Federal) BACKGROUND: The Employment and Human Services Department (EHSD) maintains an agreement with the County Health Services Department to provide personnel security officers (PSOs) at several EHSD locations. EHSD through a contract with Delta Personnel Services, Inc., DBA Guardian Security Agency (Guardian) provides security personnel services at EHSD location when PSOs are unavailable due to vacation schedules, illness, alternative work schedules, for night and social occasion events. Guardian provides contingency security services to EHSD locations. Upon request from EHSD, Guardian will provide security services APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Elaine Burres, 313-1717 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Rolanda Hartfield, Deputy cc: C. 32 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:Delta Personnel Services, Inc. DBA Guardian Security Agency, Inc. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1288 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) to perform temporary and unanticipated security related services to safeguard equipment and property, prepare reports, conduct visual checks of areas in and around EHSD suites, monitor and respond at the requests of staff regarding unauthorized visitors to insure the safety of visitors and employees at EHSD locations. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: County building sites, property, and staff would not have security and safety mechanisms in place. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1289 RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve and authorize the Health Services Director, or his designee, to execute, on behalf of the County, Contract #25–049–14 with Anka Behavioral Health, Incorporated, a non-profit corporation, in an amount not to exceed $581,873, to provide housing assistance services for County’s Homeless Program, for the period from July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018. FISCAL IMPACT: This contract is funded 100% Federal Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) McKinney-Vento grant. (No rate increase) BACKGROUND: This contract meets the social needs of the County’s population by providing support services to County residents that are homeless and have a diagnosis of mental illness, or a dual-diagnosis of mental illness and substance abuse. On July 19, 2016, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #25–049–13 with Anka Behavioral Health, Incorporated, for the period from July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017, for the provision of housing assistance services. Approval of Contract #25–049–14 will allow the Contractor to continue providing services through June 30, 2018. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Lavonna Martin (925) 313-7704 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Rolanda Hartfield, Deputy cc: L Walker, M Wilhelm C. 33 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #25–049–14 with Anka Behavioral Health, Incorporated June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1290 CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, homeless residents of Contra Costa County will not receive the housing assistance services provided by Contractor. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1291 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent to execute, on behalf of the Sheriff-Coroner, a purchase order amendment with Alcoholic Monitoring Services, to increase the payment limit by $100,000 to a new payment limit of $260,000 for purchase and/or rental of SCRAMx alcohol and house arrest monitoring devices, including monitoring service fees for the devices needed by the Electronic Home Detention Program of the Custody Alternative Facility and to extend the service period to October 31, 2017. FISCAL IMPACT: $100,000; 100% County General Fund, Budgeted. BACKGROUND: The Sheriff's Office operates an Electronic Home Detention program intended as an alternative to incarceration for those persons who are qualified for home detention. Offenders sentenced for alcohol-related offenses must be monitored daily by SCRAMx devices. The SCRAMx devices are monitored through the vendor Alcoholic Monitoring Services (AMS). This vendor's product is superior based on research, market trends APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Liz Arbuckle, 925-335-1529 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Rolanda Hartfield, Deputy cc: Liz Arbuckle, Heike Anderson, Tim Ewell C. 34 To:Board of Supervisors From:David O. Livingston, Sheriff-Coroner Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:Change Order - Alcohol Monitoring Services June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1292 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) and functionality. The flexibility to lease or purchase (depending on the demand) home detention monitoring devices has proven to produce significant long-term savings and increased revenues for the department. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: No impact. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1293 RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve and authorize the Health Services Director, or his designee, to execute, on behalf of the County, Contract Amendment Agreement #26-602-10 with Traditions Psychology Group, Inc. (dba Traditions Behavioral Health), a corporation, effective June 1, 2017, to amend Contract #26-602-9, to increase the payment limit by $650,000, from $21,550,000 to a new payment limit of $22,200,000, with no change in the original term of September 1, 2014 through August 31, 2017. FISCAL IMPACT: This amendment is funded 100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I. (No rate increase) BACKGROUND: On September 23, 2014, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #26-602-8, as amended by Contract Amendment Agreement #26-602-9, with Traditions Psychology Group, Inc. (dba Traditions Behavioral Health), for the provision of physician management and psychiatric staffing for the Inpatient Psychiatric Crisis Stabilization Unit at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center, Health Clinics and the County’s Main Detention Facility, for the period from September 1, 2014 APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Samir Shah, 925-370-5475 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Rolanda Hartfield, Deputy cc: Leslie Walker, Marcy Wilhelm C. 35 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:Amendment #26-602-10 with Traditions Psychology Group, Inc. (dba Traditions Behavioral Health) June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1294 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) through August 31, 2017. Approval of Contract Amendment Agreement #26-602-10 will allow the Contractor to provide additional physician management and psychiatric staffing services through August 31, 2017. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, the Department would not have adequate psychiatric coverage, and quality and performance compliance in the County’s Inpatient Psychiatric and Crisis Stabilization Units at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center and Health Centers and Main Detention Facility. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1295 RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve and authorize the Health Services Director, or his designee, to execute, on behalf of the County, Contract #26-936-15 with Kevin A. Beadles, M.D., an individual, in an amount not to exceed $1,350,000, for the provision of ophthalmology services at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center and Health Centers (CCRMC), for the period from June 1, 2017 through May 31, 2020. FISCAL IMPACT: This contract is funded 100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I. (No rate increase) BACKGROUND: On June 17, 2014, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #26-936-14 with Kevin A. Beadles, M.D., for the provision of ophthalmology services at CCRMC including, but not limited to: consultation, clinic coverage, training, on-call services, and medical and/or surgical procedures, for the period from June 1, 2014 through May 31, 2017. Approval of Contract #26-936-15 will allow the Contractor to continue to provide ophthalmology services to patients at CCRMC, through May 31, 2020. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, patients requiring ophthalmology services at CCRMC will not have access to Contractor’s services. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Samir Shah, M.D., 925-370-5525 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Rolanda Hartfield, Deputy cc: K Cyr, M Wilhelm C. 36 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #26-936-15 with Kevin A. Beadles, M.D. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1296 RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve and authorize the Health Services Director, or his designee, to execute, on behalf of the County, Contract #74-517-2 with Child Therapy Institute of Marin, a non-profit corporation, in an amount not to exceed $334,750, to provide mental health services for Seriously Emotionally Disturbed (SED) children and adolescents in East and West county, for the period from July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018. This contract includes a six-month automatic extension through December 31, 2018, in an amount not to exceed $167,375. FISCAL IMPACT: This contract is funded 50% Federal Financial Participation; 50% County Realignment. (3% Cost of Living Adjustment) BACKGROUND: This contract meets the social needs of County’s population by providing mental health services to adolescents with emotional and behavioral problems to improve school performance, reduce unsafe behavioral practices, and reduce the need for out-of-home placements. On May 24, 2016 the Board of Supervisors APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Cynthia Belon 925-957-5201 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Rolanda Hartfield, Deputy cc: Leslie Walker, Marcy Wilhelm C. 37 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #74-517-2 with Child Therapy Institute of Marin June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1297 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) approved Contract #74-517, (as amended by Contract Amendment Agreement #74-517-1) with Child Therapy Institute of Marin, for the provision of mental health services for Seriously Emotionally Disturbed children Approval of Contract #74-517-2, will allow the Contractor to continue to provide mental health services for Seriously Emotionally Disturbed children and adolescents in East and West County through June 30, 2018. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, SED children and adolescents will not have access to mental health services provided by Contractor. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: This program supports the following Board of Supervisors’ community outcomes: “Children Ready For and Succeeding in School”; “Families that are Safe, Stable, and Nurturing”; and “Communities that are Safe and Provide a High Quality of Life for Children and Families”. Expected program outcomes include an increase in positive social and emotional development as measured by the Child and Adolescent Functional Assessment Scale (CAFAS). June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1298 RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve and authorize the Health Services Director, or his designee, to execute, on behalf of the County, Novation Contract #74-525-1 with Center for Psychotherapy, a non-profit corporation, in an amount not to exceed $549,328, to provide mental health services, case management and crisis intervention, for Seriously Emotionally Disturbed (SED) adolescents and latency-aged children, for the period from July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018. This contract includes a six-month automatic extension through December 31, 2018, in an amount not to exceed $274,664. FISCAL IMPACT: This contract is funded 50% Federal Financial Participation; 50% Mental Health Realignment. (3% Cost of Living Adjustment) BACKGROUND: This contract meets the social needs of County’s population by providing mental health services for SED adolescents and latency-aged children. On September 13, 2016, the Board of Supervisors approved contract #74-525 with Center for Psychotherapy, for the period from October 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017, for the provision of mental health services, case management and crisis intervention for SED adolescents and latency-aged children. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Cynthia Belon 925-957-5201 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Rolanda Hartfield, Deputy cc: Leslie Walker, Marcy Wilhelm C. 38 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:Novation Contract #74-525-1 with Center for Psychotherapy June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1299 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Approval of Novation Contract #74-525-1 replaces the automatic extension under the prior Contract and allows the Contractor to continue providing services through June 30, 2018. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, SED adolescents and latency-aged children will not receive mental health services. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: This program supports the following Board of Supervisors’ community outcomes: “Children Ready For and Succeeding in School”; “Families that are Safe, Stable, and Nurturing”; and “Communities that are Safe and Provide a High Quality of Life for Children and Families”. Expected program outcomes include an increase in positive social and emotional development as measured by the Child and Adolescent Functional Assessment Scale (CAFAS). June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1300 RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve and authorize the Health Services Director, or his designee, to execute, on behalf of the County, Novation Contract #74-402-7 with Aspiranet, a non-profit corporation, in an amount not to exceed $257,500, to provide Therapeutic Behavioral Services (TBS), for the period from July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018. This contract includes a six-month automatic extension through December 31, 2018, in an amount not to exceed $128,750. FISCAL IMPACT: This contract is funded 50% Federal Financial Participation (FFP); 50% County Realignment. (Rate increase) BACKGROUND: On May 24, 2016, the Board of Supervisors approved Novation Contract #74-402-5 (as amended by Amendment Agreement #74-402-6) with Aspiranet to provide TBS to County referred clients that have been placed in group homes in Stanislaus County and to clients residing in Contra Costa County at facilities throughout the County, for the period from July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017, which included a six-month automatic extension through December 31, 2017. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Cynthia Belon 925-957-5201 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Rolanda Hartfield, Deputy cc: Leslie Walker, Marcy Wilhelm C. 39 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:Novation Contract #74-402-7 with Aspiranet June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1301 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Approval of Novation Contract #74-402-7 replaces the automatic extension under the prior contract and allows the Contractor to continue providing services through June 30, 2018. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, clients requiring TBS services will not have access to Contractor’s services, which may result in a reduction in the levels of service to the community. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1302 RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve and authorize the Health Services Director, or his designee, to execute, on behalf of the County, Contract #26-967-19 with Thomas J. McDonald, M.D., an individual, in an amount not to exceed $1,722,000, to provide ophthalmology services at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center and Health Centers (CCRMC), for the period from June 1, 2017 through May 31, 2020. FISCAL IMPACT: This contract is funded 100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I. (No rate increase) BACKGROUND: On July 8, 2014, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #26-967-16 (as amended by Amendment Agreements #26-967-17, and #26-967-18) with Thomas J. McDonald, M.D., for the provision of ophthalmology services including, but not limited to: clinic coverage, consultation, on call coverage, training and medical procedures at CCRMC for the period June 1, 2014 through May 31, 2017. Approval of Contract #26-967-19 will allow Contractor to continue to provide ophthalmology services through May 31, 2020. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Samir Shah, M.D., 925-370-5525 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Rolanda Hartfield, Deputy cc: K Cyr, M Wilhelm C. 40 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #26-967-19 with Thomas J. McDonald, M.D. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1303 CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, patients requiring ophthalmology services at CCRMC will not have access to Contractor’s services. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1304 RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve and authorize the Health Services Director, or his designee, to execute, on behalf of the County, Novation Contract #74–218–15 with Desarrollo Familiar, Inc., a non-profit corporation, in an amount not to exceed $376,302, to provide school and community based mental health services for Latino children and their families, for the period from July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018. This contract includes a six-month automatic extension through December 31, 2018, in an amount not to exceed $188,151. FISCAL IMPACT: This contract is funded 50% Federal Financial Participation; 50% State Early Periodic Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment (EPSDT) (3% Cost of Living Adjustment) BACKGROUND: This contract meets the social needs of the County’s population by providing school and community-based mental health services, including assessments; individual, group, and family counseling; medication support; case management; outreach; and crisis intervention services to an underserved Latino population in West Contra Costa County, which will result in greater home, community, and school success. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Cynthia Belon 925-957-5201 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Rolanda Hartfield, Deputy cc: Leslie Walker, Marcy Wilhelm C. 41 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:Novation Contract #74–218–15 with Desarrollo Familiar, Inc. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1305 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) On August 2, 2016, the Board of Supervisors approved Novation Contract #74–218–14 with Desarrollo Familiar, Inc. for the period from July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017, which included a six-month automatic extension through December 31, 2017, for the provision of school and community based mental health services for Latino children and their families. Approval of Novation Contract #74–218–15 replaces the automatic extension under the prior Contract and allows the Contractor to continue providing services through June 30, 2018. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, Spanish-speaking children in West Contra Costa County will have reduced access to school and community-based mental health services and may require higher levels of service. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: This program supports the following Board of Supervisors’ community outcomes: “Children Ready For and Succeeding in School”; “Families that are Safe, Stable, and Nurturing”; and “Communities that are Safe and Provide a High Quality of Life for Children and Families.” Expected program outcomes include an increase in positive social and emotional development as measured by the Child and Adolescent Functional Assessment Scale (CAFAS). June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1306 RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve and authorize the Health Services Director, or his designee, to execute, on behalf of the County, Novation Contract #74-315-13 with Community Options for Families and Youth, Incorporated, a non-profit corporation, in an amount not to exceed $2,424,529, to provide Therapeutic Behavioral Services (TBS), Multisystemic Therapy and Family Functional Therapy for the period from July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018. This contract includes a six-month automatic extension through December 31, 2018 in an amount not to exceed $1,212,264. FISCAL IMPACT: This contract is funded 43% Federal Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment; 29% County Realignment; 28% Mental Health Services Act. (3% Cost of Living Adjustment COLA) BACKGROUND: The Contract meets the social needs of County residents by providing TBS to seriously emotionally disturbed children who have been discharged from a hospital or have failed in other placements. Contractor shall also provide a Multisystemic Behavioral and Functional Family Therapy program for adolescents who are discharged from Juvenile Hall and the Orin Allen Youth Rehabilitation APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Cynthia Belon 925-957-5201 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Rolanda Hartfield, Deputy cc: Leslie Walker, Marcy Wilhelm C. 42 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:Novation Contract #74-315-13 with Community Options for Families and Youth, Incorporated June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1307 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Facility. On July 19, 2016, the Board of Supervisors approved Novation Contract #74–315–11, amended by Contract Amendment Agreement #74-315-12, with Community Options for Families and Youth, Incorporated for the period from July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017, which included a six-month automatic extension through December 31, 2017, for the provision of TBS and Multisystemic Behavioral Therapy. Approval of Novation Contract #74–315–13 replaces the automatic extension under the prior Contract and allows the Contractor to continue providing services, through June 30, 2018. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, seriously emotionally disturbed children and adolescents involved in the juvenile justice system will not have access to Contractor’s mental health services which may result in a reduction of services and placement in higher levels of care. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: This TBS program supports the following Board of Supervisors’ community outcomes: “Children Ready For and Succeeding in School”; “Families that are Safe, Stable, and Nurturing”; and “Communities that are Safe and Provide a High Quality of Life for Children and Families”. Expected program outcomes include an increase in positive social and emotional development as measured by the Child and Adolescent Functional Assessment Scale (CAFAS). June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1308 RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve and authorize the Health Services Director, or his designee, to execute, on behalf of the County, Contract #25-071-3 with Public Health Foundation Enterprises, Inc., a non-profit corporation, in an amount not to exceed $4,991,720 to provide shelter, coordinated entry, outreach and permanent supportive housing programs for homeless youth and adults in Contra Costa County, for the period from July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018. FISCAL IMPACT: This contract is funded 33% Federal funds, 49% State Funds, 12% Local Grants including Contra Costa Employment and Human Services Department, Housing Authority of Contra Costa County, and 6% County General Fund. BACKGROUND: On July 12, 2016, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #25–071-2 with Public Health Foundation Enterprise, for the period from July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017, for the provision of a shelter and a transitional and permanent supportive housing program for homeless youth and adults in Contra Costa County. Approval of Contract #25–071–3 will allow the Contractor to continue providing supportive housing services, through June 30, 2018. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Lavonna Martin 925-313-7704 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Rolanda Hartfield, Deputy cc: Leslie Walker, Marcy Wilhelm C. 43 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #25-071-3 with Public Health Foundation Enterprises, Inc. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1309 CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, County’s homeless clients will experience longer wait times for shelter and respite services. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1310 RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve and authorize the Health Services Director, or his designee, to execute, on behalf of the County, Contract #24-680-33 with Telecare Corporation, a corporation, in an amount not to exceed $1,927,909, to provide gero-psychiatric and subacute mental health care services to severely and persistently mentally ill (SPMI) clients, for the period from July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018. FISCAL IMPACT: This contract is funded 81% Mental Health Realignment and 19% Hospital Utilization Review. (Rate increase) BACKGROUND: This contract meets the social needs of the County’s population by providing gero-psychiatric services and subacute care for SPMI County residents at Contractor’s Villa Fairmont Mental Health Center, Garfield Neuro-Behavioral Center, Gladman Psychiatric Health Facility, and Morton Bakar Center. This contract is part of the Department’s cost saving plan to reduce the number of high-cost State Hospital beds by developing alternative placements. On November 1, 2016, the Board of Supervisors APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Cynthia Belon 925-957-5201 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Rolanda Hartfield, Deputy cc: Leslie Walker, Marcy Wilhelm C. 44 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #24-680-33 with Telecare Corporation June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1311 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) approved Contract #24-680-31 (as amended by Contract Amendment Agreement #24-680-32) with Telecare Corporation, for the period from July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017, for the provision of gero-psychiatric and subacute mental health care for Severely and Persistently Mentally Ill clients. Approval of Contract #24-680-33 allows the Contractor to continue providing services through June 30, 2018. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, County’s SPMI adults will not have access to Contractor’s gero-psychiatric and subacute care services resulting in placements in State Hospital facilities at greater cost to the County. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1312 RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve and authorize the Health Services Director, or his designee, to execute, on behalf of the County, Contract #23-475-6 with K.B.R., Inc. (dba Rash Curtis & Associates), a corporation, in an amount not to exceed $1,100,000, to provide debt collection services for unpaid accounts for the Health Services Department for the period from July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2019. FISCAL IMPACT: This contract is funded 100% by Hospital Enterprise Fund I. Contractor will be paid on a commission basis for debts it actually collects. (No rate increase) BACKGROUND: On August 5, 2014, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #23-475-3 (as amended by Contract Amendment Agreement #23-475-4 and Extension Agreement #23-475-5) with K.B.R., Inc. (dba Rash Curtis & Associates) for the provision of debt collection services for unpaid accounts for the Health Services Department, for the period from July 1, 2014 through June 30, 2017. Approval of Contract #23-475-6 will allow Contractor to continue providing debt collection services for unpaid accounts through June 30, 2019. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Patrick Godley 925-957-5410 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Rolanda Hartfield, Deputy cc: L Walker, M Wilhelm C. 45 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #23-475-6 with K.B.R., Inc. (dba Rash Curtis & Associates) June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1313 CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, the County will not be able to receive payment for unpaid debt collections recovered by Contractor’s services. CLERK'S ADDENDUM  Speakers: Diana Wilson and Pamela Castillo, employees of Probation Department, for juvenile justice fee collection.  June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1314 RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve and authorize the Health Services Director, or his designee, to execute, on behalf of the County, Contract #23-591-1 with Archer Business Solutions, LLC, a limited liability company, in an amount not to exceed $281,700, to provide consulting, system planning, project management and implementation support, for the Department’s Information Systems Unit for the period from July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018. FISCAL IMPACT: This contract is funded 100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I. (Rate increase) BACKGROUND: On June 21, 2016, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #23-591 with Archer Business Solutions, LLC, for the provision of consulting, technical support, training, and project management for the Department’s Information Systems Unit, for the period from July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017. Approval of Contract #23-591-1 will allow the Contractor to continue to provide consulting, training, technical support and project management services to the Department’s Information Systems Unit through June 30, 2018. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: David Runt, 925-335-8700 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Rolanda Hartfield, Deputy cc: K Cyr, M Wilhelm C. 46 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #23-591-1 with Archer Business Solutions, LLC June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1315 CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, County will not have access to Contractor’s expert technical assistance, support and optimization skills to the Department's Information Systems Unit. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1316 RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve and authorize the Health Services Director, or his designee, to execute, on behalf of the County, Contract #25–012–36 with The Center for Common Concerns, Inc. (dba HomeBase), a non-profit corporation, in an amount not to exceed $334,010, to provide consultation and technical assistance to the Department on the Continuum of Care planning and resource development, for the period from July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018. FISCAL IMPACT: This contract is funded 53% by Federal Medi-Cal Administrative Activities (MAA) and 47% by Housing Urban Development (HUD). (Rate increase) BACKGROUND: On December 8, 2016, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #25–012–33, (as amended by Amendment Agreement #25-012-34 and Extension Agreement #25-012-35) with The Center for Common Concerns, Inc. (dba HomeBase), for the period from October 1, 2015 through June 30, 2017, for the provision of consultation and technical assistance to the Department on the Continuum of Care planning and resource development, including grant-writing services for County’s McKinney-Vento application. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Lavonna Martin 925-313-7704 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Rolanda Hartfield, Deputy cc: L Walker, M Wilhelm C. 47 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #25–012–36 with The Center for Common Concerns, Inc. (dba HomeBase) June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1317 CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, County will no longer have the expertise needed to meet all federal guidelines to secure maximum McKinney-Vento funding required to implement the 10-year plan to eliminate homelessness in Contra Costa County. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1318 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent to execute, on behalf of the Employment and Human Services Department, a purchase order amendment with Sharp Business Solutions, to increase the payment limit by $65,000, to a new payment limit of $164,000, with no change to the term of July 20, 2015, through July 19, 2018, for copier leases. FISCAL IMPACT: $164,000 (including the increased amount of $65,000): 10% County, 48% State, 42% Federal. BACKGROUND: Additional funds in an amount not to exceed $65,000 are requested to increase the existing Purchase Order (PO) No. 56569 for the continued Sharp Business Systems lease of seven copies at the Employment and Human Services Department (EHSD) Stanwell Drive office site which includes EHSD's Staff Development production copier with high usage/copying costs. An eighteen (18) month lease period remains on the copier(s) PO. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Without funding, copier lease would expire for non-payment. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: Not applicable. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Elaine Burres I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Rolanda Hartfield, Deputy cc: C. 48 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:Purchase Order Increase June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1319 RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve and authorize the Health Services Director, or his designee, to execute, on behalf of the County, Contract #26-969-16 with Gupta Etwaru, M.D., an individual, in an amount not to exceed $1,461,000, for the provision of ophthalmology services at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center and Contra Costa Health Centers (CCRMC), for the period from June 1, 2017 through May 31, 2020. FISCAL IMPACT: This Contract is funded 100% Hospital Enterprise I Budget. (No rate increase) BACKGROUND: On June 16, 2015, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #26-969-14 (as amended by Amendment Agreement #26-969-15), with Gupta Etwaru, M.D., for the provision of ophthalmology services at CCRMC including, but not limited to: consultation, clinic coverage, training, on-call services and medical and/or surgical procedures, for the period from June 1, 2015 through May 31, 2017. Approval of Contract #26-969-16 will allow the Contractor to continue to provide ophthalmology services at CCRMC, through May 31, 2020. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Samir Shah, M.D., 925-370-5525 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Rolanda Hartfield, Deputy cc: K Cyr, M Wilhelm C. 49 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #26-969-16 with Gupta Etwaru, M.D. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1320 CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, patients requiring ophthalmology services will not have access to Contractor’s services. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1321 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Tri-City Power, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $600,000, for uninterruptible power supply maintenance and repair services, for the period of July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2020, Countywide. (100% General Funds) FISCAL IMPACT: This cost is to be funded through the Facilities Services maintenance budget. (100% General Fund) BACKGROUND: Facilities Services maintains all County facility uninterruptible power supplies. These units are put inline of incoming power to the buildings. In the case of a power outage, these units will allow the facility to continue functioning without losing power. We have several of these units protecting facilities at various locations such as 30 Douglas for the Department of Information Technology's (DOIT’s) computer servers, and several Health Services facilities. Even in cases where a standby generator is available, these units bridge the seconds-long gap between losing power and the generator coming online. Facilities anticipates that several of their traffic signals will be required to have these units in the near future. Facilities Services is requesting a contract be put in place for this maintenance and repair service. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Stan Burton, (925) 313-7077 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Rolanda Hartfield, Deputy cc: C. 50 To:Board of Supervisors From:Julia R. Bueren, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:APPROVE a contract with Tri-City Power, Inc. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1322 CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, uninterruptible power supply maintenance and repair services will be discontinued. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1323 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with West Contra Costa Youth Services Bureau a non-profit corporation in an amount not to exceed $250,000 to provide Child Welfare Redesign Differential Response Path 2 Case Management services in East and West Contra Costa County for the period of July 1, 2017 through June 20, 2018. (100% State) FISCAL IMPACT: $250,000.00: 100% State (Child Welfare Services Outcome Improvement Project-Realignment Funds) BACKGROUND: This Contractor was selected as a result of the competitive bid process to continue implementation of the Differential Response Path 2 Case Management Program which provides early intervention in the lives of families who have had a report of abuse or neglect. The Differential Response Program works with community-based and/or faith-based organizations to provide case management and home visiting services to high risk families to address the issues that brought the family to the attention of Children and Family Services (CFS). Selected contractors provide services to impact the family's ability to safely care for their children and avoid the further need for interaction with and further investigation by CFS. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Gina Chenoweth 3-1648 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Rolanda Hartfield, Deputy cc: C. 51 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract with West Contra Costa Youth Services Bureau for Differential Response Program Case Management Services June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1324 CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Employment and Human Services will be unable to provide valuable services. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: The services provided under this contract support all five of Contra Costa County’s community outcomes: (1) "Children Ready for and Succeeding in School"; (2) "Children and Youth Healthy and Preparing for Productive Adulthood"; (3)"Families that are Economically Self-Sufficient"; (4) "Families that are Safe, Stable and Nurturing"; and (5)"Communities that are Safe and Provide a High Quality of Life for Children and Families” by providing community-based services to families to deter continued Children and Family Services intervention. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1325 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Community Violence Solutions a non-profit corporation in an amount not to exceed $182,039 to provide Child Welfare Redesign Differential Response Path 2 Case Management services in West Contra Costa County for the period of July 1, 2017 through June 20, 2018. (100% State) FISCAL IMPACT: $182,039.00: 100% State (Child Welfare Services Outcome Improvement Project-Realignment Funds) BACKGROUND: This Contractor was selected as a result of the competitive bid process to continue implementation of the Differential Response Path 2 Case Management Program which provides early intervention in the lives of families who have had a report of abuse or neglect. The Differential Response Program works with community-based and/or faith-based organizations to provide case management and home visiting services to high risk families to address the issues that brought the family to the attention of Children and Family Services (CFS). Selected contractors provide services to impact the family's ability to safely care for their children and avoid the further need for interaction with and further investigation by CFS. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Gina Chenoweth 3-1648 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Rolanda Hartfield, Deputy cc: C. 52 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract with Community Violence Solutions for Differential Response Program Case Management Services June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1326 CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Employment and Human Services will be unable to provide valuable services. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: The services provided under this contract support all five of Contra Costa County’s community outcomes: (1) "Children Ready for and Succeeding in School"; (2) "Children and Youth Healthy and Preparing for Productive Adulthood"; (3)"Families that are Economically Self-Sufficient"; (4) "Families that are Safe, Stable and Nurturing"; and (5)"Communities that are Safe and Provide a High Quality of Life for Children and Families” by providing community-based services to families to deter continued Children and Family Services intervention. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1327 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Uplift Family Services, a non-profit corporation of California, in an amount not to exceed $546,402 to provide family preservation and support services to families referred from existing child welfare cases and/or the County Probation Department who are at risk of having their children place in out-of-home care for the period of July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018. (30% County, 70% State) FISCAL IMPACT: $546,402: 30% County, 70% State BACKGROUND: The Employment and Human Services Department, Children and Family Services Bureau selected this contractor from the competitive bid process (Request for Proposals #1148). Contractor will provide family preservation support services including ongoing case management that engage and establish a positive rapport with families who have been referred from existing child welfare cases and/or County Probation Department who are experiencing multiple stressors impacting their ability to parent effectively and consequently are at risk of having their children placed in out-of-home care. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Gina Chenoweth 3-1648 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Rolanda Hartfield, Deputy cc: C. 53 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract with Uplift Family Services for Family Preservation and Support Services June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1328 CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Employment and Human Services will be unable to provide valuable services to families at risk of having children placed in out-of-home care. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: The services provided under this contract support all five of Contra Costa County’s community outcomes: (1) "Children Ready for and Succeeding in School"; (2) "Children and Youth Healthy and Preparing for Productive Adulthood"; (3)"Families that are Economically Self-Sufficient"; (4) "Families that are Safe, Stable and Nurturing"; and (5)"Communities that are Safe and Provide a High Quality of Life for Children and Families” by providing intensive family preservation support services for families at risk of having children placed in out-of-home care. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1329 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Family Support Services, a non-profit corporation of California, in an amount not to exceed $350,000 to provide comprehensive respite services for foster parents for the period of July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018. (100% State) FISCAL IMPACT: $350,000: 100% State (50% Realignment Funding, 50% Foster Parent Recruitment, Retention, Support Grant) BACKGROUND: The Contractor was selected as a result of the competitive bidding process to provide comprehensive Respite Services including both in-home and at approved drop-off locations, to support respite-eligible families under a variety of programs. Programs include Heritage (resource families in their full-time roles as caregivers of drug-exposed children ages 0-60 months), Kinship (relative or foster caregivers and their dependent children) and any other program tha offers respite care services through any Contra Costa County approved program. Contractor will also provide a respite coordinator to coordinate and manage the various programs. The goal of the respite program is to provide comprehensive high-quality in-home, out-of-home, and approved site location respite services to support the relative caregivers and foster parents in their full-time roles as caregivers. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Gina Chenoweth 3-1648 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Rolanda Hartfield, Deputy cc: C. 54 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract with Family Support Services for Comprehensive Respite Services for Foster Parents June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1330 CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Respite services to caregivers and relative caregivers of medically fragile children will no be available through EHSD. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: The services provided under this contract support all five of Contra Costa County’s community outcomes: (1) "Children Ready for and Succeeding in School"; (2) "Children and Youth Healthy and Preparing for Productive Adulthood"; (3)"Families that are Economically Self-Sufficient"; (4) "Families that are Safe, Stable and Nurturing"; and (5)"Communities that are Safe and Provide a High Quality of Life for Children and Families” by providing respite services to families as needed during times of crisis when a caregiver needs to be away from home or when parents or relative caregivers must pursue other activities that temporarily take them away from children whose special needs require ongoing care.. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1331 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with the In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) Public Authority in an amount not to exceed $2,215,660 to provide in-home support services for the period of July 1, 2017 through June 30.2018. (16% County, 30% State, 54% Federal) FISCAL IMPACT: $2,215,660: 16% County, 30% State, 54% Federal BACKGROUND: The County Board of Supervisors enacted Ordinance Number 98-14 March 1998 establishing the Contra Costa County In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) Public Authority (PA) as an independent public agency pursuant to California Welfare and Institutions Code section 12301.6. While the IHSS-PA is an independent public agency providing services to the County, it also receives services from County departments. This dual relationship requires an agreement that establishes the respective obligations and responsibilities of the County and the PA. This board order will authorize the execution of the FY2017-18 interagency agreement and will ensure the continuation of IHSS program services. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Gina Chenoweth 3-1648 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Rolanda Hartfield, Deputy cc: C. 55 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract with Contra Costa County In-Home Supportive Services Public Authority for In-Home Support Services June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1332 CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) to County IHSS consumers and providers may not be delivered. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: None. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1333 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Contra Costa Family Justice Alliance, a non-profit corporation of California, in an amount not to exceed $150,000 to provide support services to victims of interpersonal violence and coordination of community family justice workshops for the period of July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018 (100% County) FISCAL IMPACT: $150,000: 100% County (General Fund) BACKGROUND: This contract is to ensure delivery of effective services for victims of interpersonal violence (domestic violence, sexual assault, child abuse and maltreatment, elder abuse, and human trafficking) through a coordinated, client-centered, multidisciplinary service model. Contra Costa Family Justice Alliance (CCFJA) provides support and assistance to increase the safety and empowerment of families in Contra Costa County experiencing interpersonal violence and to coordinate access to multiple service providers and achieve specific measured outcomes. CCFJA organizes and coordinates community family justice workshops, coordinates a multi-disciplinary team, participates in the Alliance to End Abuse collaborative for evaluation, planning, and fundraising as well as assisting in developing aligned policies, practices, and protocols to service delivery for victims of human trafficking. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Gina Chenoweth 3-1648 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Rolanda Hartfield, Deputy cc: C. 56 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract with Contra Costa Family Justice Alliance for Service to Victims of Interpersonal Violence June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1334 CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Victims of interpersonal violence in Contra Costa County will not have access to enhanced, coordinated services. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: The services provided under this contract support all five of Contra Costa County’s community outcomes: (1) "Children Ready for and Succeeding in School"; (2) "Children and Youth Healthy and Preparing for Productive Adulthood"; (3)"Families that are Economically Self-Sufficient"; (4) "Families that are Safe, Stable and Nurturing"; and (5)"Communities that are Safe and Provide a High Quality of Life for Children and Families” by providing support and assistance with coordinating access to multiple service providers of crisis intervention, law enforcement, and long-term wellness programs. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1335 RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve and authorize the Health Services Director, or his designee, to execute, on behalf of the County, Novation Contract #72-039-6 with West Contra Costa County Meals on Wheels, a non-profit corporation, in an amount not to exceed $61,334, to provide home-delivered meals for the Senior Nutrition Program, for the period from July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018. This Contract includes a three-month automatic extension through September 30, 2018, in an amount not to exceed $15,334. FISCAL IMPACT: This Contract is funded 100% Title III-C 2 of the Older Americans Act of funds. (No rate increase) BACKGROUND: This Contract meets the social needs of County’s population by providing home-delivered meals on 250 serving days, to an average of 400 to 450 senior citizens and County residents living with HIV/AIDS, to ensure they receive at least one-third of their daily nutritional requirements. On July 19, 2016, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #72-039-5 with West Contra Costa County Meals on Wheels APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Dan Peddycord, 925-313-6712 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Rolanda Hartfield, Deputy cc: D Morgan, M Wilhelm C. 57 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:Novation Contract #72-039-6 with West Contra Costa County Meals on Wheels June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1336 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) for the provision of home-delivered meals for the Senior Nutrition Program, for the period from July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017, which included a three month automation extension period through September 30, 2017, for the provision of home-delivered meals for the Senior Nutrition Program, which included modifications to County’s Standard indemnification clause and General Conditions. Approval of this Novation Contract #72-039-6 replaces the automatic extension under the prior contract, allowing the Contractor to continue to provide home-delivered meals for the Senior Nutrition Program through June 30, 2018. This Contract includes modifications to County’s Standard Indemnification and Confidentiality clauses. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, West County’s homebound senior citizens and HIV/AIDS patients will not receive meals which provide at least one-third of their daily nutrition. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1337 RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve and authorize the Health Services Director, or his designee, to execute, on behalf of the County, Novation Contract #22–033–60 with Meals on Wheels and Senior Outreach Services of Contra Costa, a non-profit corporation, in an amount not to exceed $182,778, to provide congregate meals for the Senior Nutrition Program, for the period from July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018. This Contract includes a three-month automatic extension through September 30, 2018, in an amount not to exceed $45,695. FISCAL IMPACT: This Contract is 100% federally funded under Title III-C1 of the Older Americans Act of 1965, through an interdepartmental agreement with the Contra Costa Employment and Human Services Department. (Rate increase) BACKGROUND: This Contract meets the social needs of County’s population in providing congregate meals on 250 serving days, to an average of 210 senior citizens per day, to ensure they receive at least one-third of their daily nutritional requirements. On June 14, 2016, the Board of Supervisors approved Novation APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Dan Peddycord 925-313-6712 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Rolanda Hartfield, Deputy cc: D Morgan, M Wilhelm C. 58 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:Novation Contract #22–033–60 with Meals on Wheels and Senior Outreach Services of Contra Costa June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1338 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Contract #22-033-59 with Meals on Wheels, and Senior Outreach Services of Contra Costa, for the period from July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017, which included a three-month automatic extension through September 30, 2017, for the provision of congregate meal services for the Senior Nutrition Program. Approval of Novation Contract #22-033-60 replaces the automatic extension under the prior Contract, and allows the Contractor to continue providing services through June 30, 2018, including modifications to County’s Standard Indemnification and Confidentiality clauses. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, congregate meal service for senior nutrition program will not be provided. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1339 RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve and authorize the Health Services Director, or his designee, to execute, on behalf of the County, Novation Contract #22–137–51, with Meals on Wheels and Senior Outreach Services, a non-profit corporation, in an amount not to exceed $376,637, to provide home-delivered meals for the Senior Nutrition Program, for the period from July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018. This Contract includes a three-month automatic extension through September 30, 2018, in an amount not to exceed $94,159. FISCAL IMPACT: This Contract is 100% federally funded under Title III-C2 of the Older Americans Act of 1965. (Rate increase) BACKGROUND: This Contract meets the social needs of County’s population by providing home-delivered meals on 250 serving days, to an average of 830 senior citizens, to ensure they receive at least one-third of their daily nutritional requirements. On June 14, 2016, the Board of Supervisors approved Novation Contract #22-137-50 with Meals on Wheels and Senior Outreach Services of Contra Costa, for the period from July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017, which included APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Daniel Peddycord, 925-313-6712 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Rolanda Hartfield, Deputy cc: D Morgan, M Wilhelm C. 59 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:Novation Contract #22–137–51 with Meals on Wheels and Senior Outreach Services June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1340 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) a three-month automatic extension through September 30, 2017, for the provision of home-delivered meals for the Senior Nutrition Program. Approval of Novation Contract #22-137-51 replaces the automatic extension under the prior Contract and allows the Contractor to continue providing services through June 30, 2018, including modifications to County’s Standard Indemnification and Confidentiality clauses. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, County’s homebound senior citizens will not receive Senior Nutrition Program meals, which provide at least one third of their daily nutrition. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1341 RECOMMENDATION(S): AUTHORIZE the Auditor-Controller to issue a warrant in the amount of $24,000 to the Contra Costa County Office of Education from the Child Care Mitigation Fund to help fund the 2017 Comprehensive Countywide Child Care Needs Assessment and Child Care Facility Study. FISCAL IMPACT: No impact on the General Fund. The Child Care mitigation fee was adopted in 1992 in response to the increased need for childcare facilities that accompanies new development. The Child Care Mitigation Fund is financed by a $400 per unit development fee on residential development projects under 29 units in the county unincorporated area. The current balance of the fund is approximately $1.1 million dollars. BACKGROUND: Contra Costa County Office of Education's Local Planning and Advisory Council for Early Care and Education (LPC) has requested $24,000 from the Child Care Mitigation Fund to assist in financing the 2017 Comprehensive Countywide Child Care Needs Assessment and Child Care Facility Study (the Study). The Study will cost $75,000 and is also funded by First Five Contra Costa ($35,000) and the LPC ($16,000). The Study is conducted every five years and aims to determine the child care needs and facilities available for development in Contra Costa County. The Study will be conducted by Brion Economic, Inc., and will be implemented in two phases resulting in the following data: APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Kristine Solseng, (925) 674-7809 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Rolanda Hartfield, Deputy cc: C. 60 To:Board of Supervisors From:John Kopchik, Director, Conservation & Development Department Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:LPC Child Care Mitigation Fund Request June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1342 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) > Gather and review all existing studies and data on child care facilities serving children ages 0-12 in Contra Costa County; Identify a list of entities that may have the capacity and/or interest in providing land or space for new or expanded facilities; Estimate current child care supply / demand and the current shortfall by community (city and unincorporated communities); Data categorization will include: population, ethnicity, language spoken, income levels, children in Child Protective Services, demand for part day and full day care for children ages 0-12 years; Candidate list of potential child care sites for further investigation. The work will form the foundation for subsequent phases including a Child Care Capital Improvement Plan, Site Analysis, and a Child Care Financing Strategy. The Study is consistent with the Child Care Facilities Ordinance fee, which states that mitigation fees collected "shall be reserved to assist in meeting child care facility needs in the community in which the development occurred." The Study and proposed future studies will provide necessary data and analysis to better direct future Child Care Mitigation Funds. The Study will also provide an opportunity to further the partnership between Department of Conservation and Development and the LPC on long-term systemic efficiencies and expansion of child care services within Contra Costa County. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Without the allocation of County Childcare Mitigation Funds, the LPC may not have the resources required to complete the Study in a timely manner. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: The Child Care Assessment supports the following community outcomes established in the Children's Report Card: Children are Healthy and Ready for School and Families are Economically Self-Sufficient. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1343 RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve and authorize the Purchasing Agent, on behalf of the Health Services Department, to execute a Purchase Order with UptoDate, in an amount not to exceed $146,616, for the purchase of a one year site license for their online database, to access medical information at the point of care for Contra Costa Regional Medical Center medical staff, for the period from June 1, 2017 through May 31, 2018. FISCAL IMPACT: 100% funding is included in the Hospital Enterprise Fund I Budget. BACKGROUND: CCRMC medical staff uses UptoDate to access the most recent medical information at the point-of-care. This information helps them make the critical decisions that are necessary for safe, effective, and efficient patient care. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this Purchase Order is not approved, CCRMC medical staff will not have access to the most recent medical information at the point-of-care to treat patients. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Anna Roth, 925-370-5101 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: , Deputy cc: Tasha Scott, Marcy Wilhelm, Margaret Harris C. 61 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:Purchase Order with UptoDate June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1344 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Conservation and Development Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Bodhaine Discing and Grading, to extend the term from June 30, 2017 through June 30, 2020 and increase the payment limit by $60,000 to a new payment limit of $120,000 to continue to provide weed abatement and general clean-up services. FISCAL IMPACT: None to County General Fund. Costs are covered by the Low Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund for these sites now owned by the Housing Successor. BACKGROUND: The Department of Conservation and Development (Housing Successor) staff selected Bodhaine Discing and Grading (Contractor), because the Contractor has already been providing weed abatement services for the Redevelopment Agency owned properties. Because of the dissolution of the Redevelopment Agency and the change of the property maintenance responsibility to the County, as Housing Successor, and funding source, a new contract was signed with the Contractor on July 1, 2014 to provide annual weed abatement needs as well as on-call weed abatement and general property clean-up, as issues arise. The Contractor is familiar with the properties needing abatement and staff preferred not introduce a new vendor in order to avoid additional start-up costs due to limited source of funds available to maintain Housing Successor properties. As the need of services is ongoing, staff requests this amendment to allow the Contractor to continue to provide weed abatement and general clean-up services. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Raymond Wong (925) 674-7897 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Rolanda Hartfield, Deputy cc: C. 62 To:Board of Supervisors From:John Kopchik, Director, Conservation & Development Department Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract Amendment with Bodhaine Discing and Grading June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1345 CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract amendment is not approved, the Contractor will not be able to continue to provide the same required services. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1346 RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve and authorize the Purchasing Agent, on behalf of the Health Services Department, to execute a Purchase Order with AGFA Healthcare Corporation, in an amount not to exceed $312,735, for (1) the Circles of Care Service Maintenance Agreement, (2) the Maintenance Price and Inventory Summary, and (3) Terms and Conditions for the period of April 1, 2017 through March 31, 2018. FISCAL IMPACT: 100% Funding is included in the Hospital Enterprise Fund I Budget. BACKGROUND: Health Services uses the AGFA Circles of Care software for necessary service and maintenance support to the cardiology and diagnostic imaging departments’ electronic imaging systems, at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center and Health Centers (CCRMC and Health Centers). Currently CCRMC and Health Centers utilize the AGFA Impax system for all diagnostic and cardiology images. The system provides high quality imaging for patients, and continuous image availability to the caregivers. Sustaining this availability requires a maintenance and support agreement with APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: David Runt, 925-313-6228 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Rolanda Hartfield, Deputy cc: Tasha Scott, Marcy Wilhelm C. 63 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:Purchase Order with AGFA Healthcare Corporation for Circles of Care Maintenance Renewal June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1347 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) the vendor. Without this renewal, CCRMC and Health Centers will no longer receive critical software updates or vendor support in the event of a system failure. The Terms and Conditions provide that the County will indemnify the Contractor for loss and damage related to County’s performance of the Agreement, and for any damage and costs arising from an infringement claim by a third party related to modifications to the software by County. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this Purchase Order renewal is not approved, image availability will be limited or not available, and patient care would be severely jeopardized in the event of a system failure. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1348 RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve and authorize the Purchasing Agent, on behalf of the Health Services Department, to execute a blanket Purchase Order with Praxair Distribution, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $240,000, to purchase oxygen and other gases for the Respiratory Therapy Unit at the Contra Costa Regional Medical Center, and the Contra Costa Health Centers, for the period June 1, 2017 through May 31, 2019. FISCAL IMPACT: 100% funding is included in the Hospital Enterprise Fund I Budget. BACKGROUND: The CCRMC and Health Centers has experienced a large increase in patients requiring respiratory therapy. In order to offer life support with supplemental oxygen and complete some laboratory testing, the CCRMC and Health Centers must have access to various medical gases. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this Purchase Order is not approved, we will not be able to provide critical life supportive respiratory therapy to our patient population at the Contra Costa Regional Medical Center and Health Centers. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Anna Roth, 925-370-5101 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Rolanda Hartfield, Deputy cc: Tasha Scott, Marcy Wilhelm, Margaret Harris C. 64 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:Praxair Distribution, Inc. Purchase Order June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1349 RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve and authorize the Purchasing Agent, on behalf of the Health Services Department, to execute a Purchase Order with Groupware Technology Inc., in an amount not to exceed $146,810, for (1) a Rubrik Product Warranty and Support Services Policy with Rubrik Inc., and (2) Rubrik End User License and Limited Warranty Agreement with Rubrik Inc. for license, maintenance, and support of Rubrik appliances and software, for the period from March 3, 2017 through January 2, 2019. FISCAL IMPACT: 100% Funding is included in the Hospital Enterprise Fund I Budget. BACKGROUND: The Health Services Information Technology Division currently owns Rubrik storage hardware and uses the Rubrik backup system, which holds data for the Epic Electronic Health Record (EHR) System. This Purchase Order is for the continued maintenance and support of the backup appliances and support services, which allow the division to backup EPIC patient data. This renewal will allow the vendor to provide maintenance and support through January 2, 2019. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: David Runt, 925-313-6228 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Rolanda Hartfield, Deputy cc: Tasha Scott, Marcy Wilhelm C. 65 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:Purchase Order with Groupware Technology Inc., for Rubrik Maintenance Support June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1350 CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this Purchase Order renewal is not approved, it will directly affect EPIC EHR patient data. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1351 RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve and authorize the Health Services Director, or his designee, to execute, on behalf of the County, Contract Extension Agreement #23-326-18 with Aspira Technologies, Inc., a corporation, to extend the termination date from June 30, 2017 to June 30, 2018, for the provision of consulting and technical assistance to the Department’s Information Systems Unit. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no change in the Contract Payment Limit of $352,250. This Contract is funded 100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I. (No rate increase) BACKGROUND: On August 16, 2016, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #23-326-16 (as amended by Amendment Agreement #23-326-17), with Aspira Technologies, Inc., for the provision of consulting and technical assistance to the Department’s Information Systems Unit, for the period from July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017. Approval of Contract Extension Agreement #23-326-18 will allow the Contractor to continue providing consulting and technical assistance to the Department’s Information Systems Unit through June 30, 2018. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: David Runt, 925-335-8700 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Rolanda Hartfield, Deputy cc: K Cyr, M Wilhelm C. 66 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:Extension #23-326-18 with Aspira Technologies, Inc. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1352 CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this extension is not approved, Contractor will not continue to provide services. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1353 RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve and authorize the Purchasing Agent, on behalf of the Health Services Department, to execute a Change Order to Purchase Order #F03835 with Mesa Laboratories, Inc., to add $99,000 for a new total of $198,000 for calibration of thermometers for the Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (CCRMC) Nutritional Services and Laboratories, with no change in the term of March 1, 2016 through February 28, 2018. FISCAL IMPACT: 100% funding is included in the Hospital Enterprise Fund I Budget. BACKGROUND: CCRMC is requires to have thermometers for refrigerators and freezers calibrated regularly to ensure that food, medications, and cultures are kept at the correct temperature. The CCRMC has greatly expanded and upgraded Nutritional Services and the Laboratories, and now requires more of this work to be done on more units. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this Change Order is not approved, the CCRMC would not be able to have all its refrigerating units thermometers calibrated, which could expose patients to harm or cause a regulating agency to fine the hospital. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Anna Roth, 925-370-5101 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Rolanda Hartfield, Deputy cc: Tasha Scott, Marcy Wilhelm, Margaret Harris C. 67 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:Change Order with Mesa Laboratories, Inc. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1354 RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve and authorize the Purchasing Agent, on behalf of the Health Services Department, to execute a Purchase Order with One Workplace, in an amount not to exceed $124,000, for the purchase of work stations and furniture for the Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (CCRMC), and Contra Costa Health Centers, for the period of June 28, 2017 through June 27, 2018. FISCAL IMPACT: 100% funding is included in the Hospital Enterprise Fund I budget. BACKGROUND: One Workplace supplies furniture and installation for offices and other spaces at the CCRMC and Contra Costa Health Centers. CCRMC has seen a large increase in the number of patients, and more staff is required to treat them. This increase in staff means that offices must be remodeled to accommodate them. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this Purchase Order is not approved, the CCRMC and Health Centers will not be able to meet the office needs of staff. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Anna Roth, 925-370-5101 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Rolanda Hartfield, Deputy cc: Tasha Scott, Marcy Wilhelm, Margaret Harris C. 68 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:Blanket Purchase Order with One Workplace June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1355 RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve and authorize the Health Services Director or his designee, to execute on behalf of the County, Contract #26-378-9 with Concord Yellow Cab, Inc., a corporation, in an amount not to exceed $300,000, to provide taxicab transportation services to patients to and from Contra Costa Regional Medical Center, and Contra Costa Health Centers (CCRMC) and other health facilities, for the period from July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018. FISCAL IMPACT: This contract is funded 100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I. (No rate increase) BACKGROUND: On June 14, 2016 the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #26-378-8 with Concord Yellow Cab, Inc., for the provision of transportation for patients unable to transport themselves to medical appointments due to medical conditions, including but not limited to: physical disabilities which make it unsafe for patient to travel on public transportation, patient who has a verifiable seizure disorder, or patient who has received medication which has or could, impair the mobility or coordination of the patient, for the period from July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Anna Roth, 925-370-5101 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Rolanda Hartfield, Deputy cc: K Cyr, M Wilhelm C. 69 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #26-378-9 with Concord Yellow Cab, Inc. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1356 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Approval of Contract #26-378-9 will allow the Contractor to continue to provide transportation services to patients unable to transport themselves through June 30, 2018. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, patients requiring transportation services will not receive transportation services from the Contractor. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1357 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent, on behalf of the Health Services Department, to execute a Purchase Order with Experian Health Inc., in an amount not to exceed $356,400, for purchase of subscription and support services for Electronic Claims and Remittance Systems Software, for the period July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2019. FISCAL IMPACT: 100% Funding is included in the Hospital Enterprise Fund I Budget. BACKGROUND: Since 2001 the Patient Accounting Department has used Experian Health revenue cycle products to simplify claims processing, and expedite receipt of payments. Contra Costa Health Services (CCHS) uses the following Experian Health modules for accurate posting of payments and adjustments: (1) Electronic Claims Processing, (2) Remittance and Payment Processing, (3) Real-time Transactions Eligibility, and (4) Financial Reporting. This application also meets Epic guidelines for Medicare Rules. The subscription and support services are governed by the existing Master Customer Agreement between the County and Experian. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: David Runt, 925-313-6228 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Rolanda Hartfield, Deputy cc: Tasha Scott, Marcy Wilhelm, Renee Nunez C. 70 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:Purchase Order for Experian Health Inc. for Subscription and Software Maintenance June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1358 CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this Purchase Order is not approved, the Department will not receive critical software updates and may lead to significant hospital Revenue impact to CCHS. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1359 RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve and authorize the Purchasing Agent on behalf of the Health Services Department, to execute a Purchase Order with Epic Systems Corporation, in an amount not to exceed $7,000,000, for maintenance on Epic Electronic Health Records System, for Contra Costa Regional Medical Center, for the period from July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2020. FISCAL IMPACT: 100% Funding is included in the Hospital Enterprise Fund I Budget. BACKGROUND: Epic provides software for inpatient and ambulatory patient care, laboratory, pharmacy, order management, billing, advice nurse, managed care, as well as others in one integrated system. With this single integrated Epic solution, managing the patient’s care, whether at the hospital, the doctor’s office, or through the Health Plan, will allow all physicians, nurses, clinicians, and patient care mangers to have the same longitudinal view of the patient. Using Epic will allow the easy sharing of clinical information with our major patient referral facilities (Kaiser, Sutter, UCSF, UCD, and Stanford). CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If the maintenance contract of our Epic system in not approved, it will directly affect patient care at CCRMC. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: David Runt, 925-313-6228 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Rolanda Hartfield, Deputy cc: Tasha Scott, Marcy Wilhelm, Renee Nunez C. 71 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:Purchase Order with Epic Systems Corporation June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1360 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent, on behalf of the Health Services Department, to execute (1) a Change Order to the October 6, 2016 Purchase Order F005824 with Direct Systems Support, adjusting the end of the coverage period for IBM hardware maintenance support, from the previous end date of June 30, 2017, to a new end date of October 9, 2017, with no changes to the amount of the October 6, 2016 Purchase Order, (2) a Purchase Order with Direct Systems Support in an amount not to exceed $205,151, for annual hardware maintenance support of the EMC VMAX data storage system, and (3) the Statement Of Work and Schedule with IBM to provide hardware maintenance support, pursuant to a Master Services Agreement, for the period of October 10, 2017 through October 9, 2018. FISCAL IMPACT: 100% Funding is included in the Hospital Enterprise Fund I Budget. BACKGROUND: Contra Costa Health Services utilizes the EMC VMAX system for storage of the Epic Electronic Health Record (EHR) system data. This purchase order is for renewal of the maintenance for the data storage. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: David Runt, 925-313-6228 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Rolanda Hartfield, Deputy cc: Tasha Scott, Marcy Wilhelm, Renee Nunez C. 72 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:Purchase Order with Direct Systems Support for EMC VMAX maintenance support renewal June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1361 CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Failure to renew maintenance support would directly impact patient care. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1362 RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve and authorize the Purchasing Agent, on behalf of Health Services Department, to execute a new Purchase Order with Coffey Communications, Inc., in the amount of $325,000, for printing the Contra Costa Health Plan (CCHP) members’ “Health Sense” newsletter, for the period from July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2019. FISCAL IMPACT: 100% funding included in the Hospital Enterprise Fund I Budget BACKGROUND: CCHP is required by various contracts to distribute critical health information to its members. CCHP uses this newsletter to update members on resources, health education classes, preventative health guidelines, flu clinics, schedules, and/or any other important information. CCHP’s utilization of Coffey Communications, Inc. has been steadily increasing as its membership continues to increase. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this Purchase Order is not approved, CCHP will not be able to mail quarterly Health Sense newsletter to CCHP members. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Anna Roth, 925-370-5101 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Rolanda Hartfield, Deputy cc: Tasha Scott, Marcy Wilhelm, Margaret Harris C. 73 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:Purchase Order with Coffey Communications, Inc. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1363 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent, on behalf of the Health Services Director, to execute amendment to Purchase Order F005532 with OmniPro, LLC, to increase the payment limit by $750,000 to a new payment limit of $1,100,000, for additional custom Lenovo Tiny PC’s, monitors, Lenovo laptops and parts, and extend termination date through August 31, 2018. FISCAL IMPACT: 100% funding is included in the Hospital Enterprise Fund I Budget. BACKGROUND: Health Services Department Information Technology (IT) Unit currently owns Lenovo Tiny PC Systems, Lenovo laptops, monitors and other related Lenovo hardware. The Lenovo M900 Tiny PC is a custom configured, ultra slim chassis, designed to fit in our Hospitals and Health Clinic exam rooms. Lenovo laptops are used by our medical staff in the field, by our nursing staff in our mobile health clinics, and by our IT staff in the field. All Lenovo hardware includes a 5 year warranty on parts, labor, imaging, and asset tagging. Pricing is fixed under Government NASPO Contract no: MNWNC-117. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: David Runt, 925-313-6228 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Rolanda Hartfield, Deputy cc: Tasha Scott, Marcy Wilhelm, Renee Nunez C. 74 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:Amendment Purchase Order with OmniPro, LLC June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1364 CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If additional equipment is not purchased, it will directly affect hospital staff using this technology to access medical record information. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1365 RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve and authorize the Health Services Director, or his designee, to execute, on behalf of the County, Contract #26-577-15 with All Health Services, Corporation, in an amount not to exceed $1,183,000, to provide temporary medical staffing services at the Contra Costa Regional Medical Center, Contra Costa Health Centers (CCRMC), and Detention Facilities for the period from May 1, 2017 through April 30, 2018, This contract does not include classifications represented by Teamsters, Local 856. FISCAL IMPACT: This contract is funded 100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I. (No rate increase) BACKGROUND: On October 20, 2015, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #26-577-12 (as amended by Amendment Agreements #26-577-13 and #26-577-14), with All Health Services, Corporation to provide temporary medical staffing services at CCRMC, and Detention Facilities, including APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Anna Roth, 925-370-5101 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Rolanda Hartfield, Deputy cc: Tasha Scott, Marcy Wilhelm, Kathleen Cyr C. 75 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #26-577-15 with All Health Services, Corporation June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1366 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Registered Nurses, Certified Nursing Assistants, Physical and Occupational Therapists, and Psychiatric Technicians, for the period from October 1, 2015 through April 30, 2017. Approval of Contract #26-577-15 will allow Contractor to continue to provide temporary medical staffing services at the Contra Costa Regional Medical Center, Contra Costa Health Centers (CCRMC), and Detention Facilities, for classifications not represented by Teamsters, Local 856 through April 30, 2018. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, the Department will not have appropriate clinical/medical staff at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center, Health Centers, and Detention Facilities to cover during temporary staff absences, vacations and vacancies. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1367 RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve and authorize the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute, on behalf of the County, Contract #26-644-19 with MGA Healthcare, Inc., a corporation, in an amount not to exceed $1,565,000, to provide temporary medical staffing and recruitment services at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center and Health Centers for the period from May 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017. This contract does not include classifications represented by Teamsters, Local 856 FISCAL IMPACT: This contract is funded 100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I. (No rate increase) BACKGROUND: On March 21, 2017, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #26-644-18 with MGA Healthcare, Inc., for the provision of temporary pharmacists, laboratory, respiratory, pharmacy, and radiology technicians, specialty registered nurses and permanent placement recruitment services at CCRMC, to provide coverage during peak loads, temporary absences and emergencies, for the APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Anna Roth, 925-370-5101 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Rolanda Hartfield, Deputy cc: Tasha Scott, Marcy Wilhelm, Kathleen Cyr C. 76 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #26-644-19 with MGA Healthcare, Inc. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1368 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) period from March 22, 2017 through April 30, 2017. Approval of Contract #26-644-19 will allow the Contractor to continue providing temporary medical staffing and recruitment services as needed at CCRMC to cover temporary absences, leaves, and vacancies through December 31, 2017, which does not include classifications represented by Teamsters, Local 856. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, the Department will not have appropriate clinical/medical staff at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center, Health Centers, and Detention Facilities to cover during temporary staff absences, vacations and vacancies. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1369 RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve and authorize the Health Services Director, or his designee, to execute Contract #26-323-28 with CareerStaff, Unlimited, Inc., a corporation, in an amount not to exceed $125,000, for the provision of temporary medical staffing services, at the Contra Costa Regional Medical Center, Health Centers and Detention Facility, for the period from May 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017. This contract does not include classifications represented by Teamsters, Local 856. FISCAL IMPACT: 100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I. (No rate increase) BACKGROUND: On March 7, 2017, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #26-323-27 with CareerStaff, Unlimited, Inc. for the provision of occupational, physical and speech therapists, pharmacists and pharmacy technicians, medical social workers, ultrasound technologists and other ancillary classifications through April 30, 2017. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Anna Roth, 925-370-5101 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Rolanda Hartfield, Deputy cc: K Cyr, M Wilhelm C. 77 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #26-323-28 with CareerStaff Unlimited, Inc. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1370 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Approval of this contract will allow the Health Services Department to continue to provide temporary staffing services at the Contra Costa Regional Medical Center, Health Centers and Detention Facility for medical staff through December 30, 2017, and which will not include classifications represented by Teamsters Local 856. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, the Contra Costa Regional Medical Center, Health Centers and Detention Facility will not be able to provide necessary services to its patients and the Contractor will not be able to provide services through December 31, 2017. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1371 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Sheriff-Coroner, or designee, to execute an amendment to the software site license and support agreement with Vigilant Solutions, LLC; in an amount not to exceed $278,600, for the term June 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018 continuing from year to year there-after. FISCAL IMPACT: Funding is as follows: Donations: $95,000 CSA P-2B Alamo Funds: $ 50,000 CSA P-6 Zone funds (Alamo/Las Trampas area): $133,600 No General Fund monies will be used for this purchase. BACKGROUND: The Office of the Sheriff entered into a software site license and support agreement on May 14, 2013 for the purchase subscription and support of car mounted license plate readers. Beginning in September, 2015, members of the Alamo Police Services Advisory Committee (P2b), the Diablo Community Services District Board and the Roundhill District Advisory Board (P5) each APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Sandra Brown 925-335-1553 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Rolanda Hartfield, Deputy cc: C. 78 To:Board of Supervisors From:David O. Livingston, Sheriff-Coroner Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:Vigiliant Solutions, LLC June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1372 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) requested the Contra Costa County Office of the Sheriff research the viability of increased services. The areas are currently patrolled by the Office of the Sheriff and have increased services for which they pay from their special assessment funds. The board members voiced concerns of increased crime rates in the central Contra Costa County corridor. The concerns were bolstered by several articles posted in local news media, referring to a dramatic increase in residential burglaries, specifically in the Danville and San Ramon areas. A review of actual crime statistics in the greater Alamo area did not show a significant increase in reported crimes over the last several years. However, there was an increase in property crime and residential burglaries specifically in the Contra Costa County central 680 corridor. Based on reviews of the options available, the potential benefits, current policy and impact to the Sheriff's Office personnel involved, the district board members agreed the implementation of 21 stationary automatic license plate reader (ALPR) cameras would best benefit the greater Alamo area to help prevent crime and increase the solvability of cases. Vigilant Solutions stationary ALPR camera systems provide both the preventative and investigative value needed in the Alamo area. The cameras are the same type as utilized in the vehicular mobile application already employed in the Sheriff's Patrol environment. The contract amendment provides for the purchase and subscription of 21 stationary ALPRs. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: ALPR cameras will not have the proper licensing and support agreements in place. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: No impact. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1373 RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution 2017/175 establishing the East Richmond Heights Municipal Advisory Council for the area described in Exhibit A; AUTHORIZE up to $3,000 for administrative expenses in fiscal year 2017/18 for the East Richmond Heights Municipal Advisory Council consistent with the same level of support provided to the existing Municipal Advisory Councils in the County. FISCAL IMPACT: Up to $3,000 (100% General Fund). BACKGROUND: The District One Supervisor has found that there is community support for establishing an East Richmond Heights Municipal Advisory Council. To address the issues expressed by residents, a MAC in East Richmond Heights would act as a coordination point between East Richmond Heights residents, the District One Supervisor, and County departments. The MAC would provide a greater opportunity for residents to effectively interface with the County and would make it easier for County staff to hear the concerns of residents and receive input on those concerns. The MAC would be composed of 5 members and 2 alternates to be selected by the District One Supervisor and approved by the Board of Supervisors. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: James Lyons, 510-231-8692 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stephanie Mello, Deputy cc: Robert Campbell, County Auditor-Controller C. 79 To:Board of Supervisors From:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:Adopt Resolution 2017/175 establishing the East Richmond Heights Municipal Advisory Council June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1374 AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2017/175 Exhibit_A Exhibit_B East_Richmond_Heights_MAC_Establishment MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution No. 2017/175 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1375 Recorded at the request of:John Gioia Return To:John Gioia THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 06/13/2017 by the following vote: AYE:John Gioia, District I SupervisorCandace Andersen, District II SupervisorDiane Burgis, District III SupervisorKaren Mitchoff, District IV SupervisorFederal D. Glover, District V Supervisor NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2017/175 In the matter of establishing the East Richmond Heights Municipal Advisory Council WHEREAS, there is community support to establish an East Richmond Heights Municipal Advisory Council to advise the Board of Supervisors on issues of concern to the East Richmond Heights community; and WHEREAS, establishing an East Richmond Heights Municipal Advisory Council will help improve the ability of the District One Supervisor to receive advice and input on issues of concern to the East Richmond community. 1. Establishment of East Richmond Heights Municipal Advisory Council. Pursuant to the authority granted by Section 31010 of the California Government Code, the East Richmond Heights Municipal Advisory Council (“Council”) is established. 2. Territorial Area. The area for which the Council will serve and discharge the following duties and powers is that area contained within the boundaries indicated on the attached map marked as Exhibit A (hereafter referred to as the “East Richmond community”). 3. Membership. The Council shall consist of five (5) members and two (2) alternates, who shall be selected and appointed by the Board of Supervisors, upon nomination by the District One Supervisor. Six (6) of these appointees shall be residents of the unincorporated East Richmond community, and one shall be a resident of either the unincorporated East Richmond community or the area within the boundaries of the East Richmond Neighborhood Council in the City of Richmond as shown on the attached map marked as Exhibit B. 4. Term of Office. Council member terms shall be coterminous with the term of office of the District One Supervisor. 5. Removal from Office. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1376 Each appointed member of the Council serves at the pleasure of the Board of Supervisors and may be removed, at will, by a majority vote of the Board of Supervisors. 6. Council Duties and Powers. A. The Council shall advise the Board of Supervisors on services which are or may be provided to the East Richmond community by the County or other local governmental agencies. Such services include, but are not limited to, public health, safety, fire, welfare, public works and planning. B. The Council may represent the East Richmond community before the County Planning Commission, the Zoning Administrator and the Board of Supervisors on land use, planning and zoning matters. C. The Council may provide input and reports to the District One Supervisor, the Board of Supervisors, and County staff on issues of concern to the East Richmond community. D. It is understood that the Board of Supervisors is the final decision making authority with respect to issues and policies concerning the East Richmond community and that the Council shall serve solely in an advisory capacity to the District One Supervisor and the Board of Supervisors. Except as specified in 6(B) above, the Council and its individual members acting on behalf of the Council may not represent the East Richmond community to any state, other County, city, special district or school district agency or commission, or any other organization on any matter concerning the community. In addition, the Council may not, as a body, take positions on candidates for public office. 7. Quorum and Vote Necessary for Action. A quorum shall be a majority of the total number of authorized seats on the Council, not a majority of the total number of filled seats. The Council may only take action by a majority vote of the total number of authorized seats, not by a majority vote of the quorum. (With five authorized seats, a quorum is three members; three affirmative votes are necessary for action.) An alternate member(s) may vote in place of a regular member(s) who is absent. 8. Compensation. The Council members shall serve without compensation of any kind, and the Board of Supervisors shall not provide funds for the payment of Council meeting stipends or reimbursement of Council members’ expenses. 9. Staff and Financial Support. A. The Board of Supervisors shall provide no ongoing professional or clerical staff support to the Council. B. Unless specifically authorized by the Board of Supervisors, the Council shall not receive any funds from the County to pay for any of the Council’s operating costs. 10. Council Funds. Any funds transferred to or received by the County shall be accepted pursuant to Resolution No. 2005/628 and only used for the benefit of the Council and the East Richmond community. 11. Council Establishment Not Subject to Public Vote. The issue of establishment of the Council shall not be an election item submitted to the voters of the East Richmond community. 12. Council Operation and Procedural Rules. Within the parameters of the Resolution, the Council may organize itself and operate as it determines but shall hold regular meetings at least quarterly at an established time and place. The Council meetings shall be conducted in accordance with the provisions of the “Brown Act” (Government Code sections 54950 ff.) including the pre-meeting posting of meeting calendar notices, and the “Better Government Ordinance” (County Ordinance Code , Division 25). In addition, the Council shall fully comply with the Board of Supervisors’ policy concerning conflict of interest and open meetings (Resolution No. 2002/376), the Board’s policy governing appointments to boards, committees and commissions (Resolution No. 2002/377), the Board’s policies for Municipal Advisory Councils (approved December 16, 2008), and the Political Reform Act (Government Code sections June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1377 81000 ff.) as applicable. Contact: James Lyons, 510-231-8692 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stephanie Mello, Deputy cc: Robert Campbell, County Auditor-Controller June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1378 RICHMOND RICHMOND ELCERRITO SANPABLO EastRichmondHeights ElSobranteMAC RICHMOND §¨¦80 A r l i n g t o n B l v d Barrett Ave Solano Av e M c B ry d e A veYuba S tKe rn S t Amado r S t Park Ave B ern hard A ve Hazel A ve Clinton Ave Sierra Ave Mc Bryde Ave Dimm WayS onoma St Ral st on Av e Ke y B lvd Tula r e Av e Pl y m o u t h A v e Mari n AveYale Ave Kensington AveMonterey AveCarquinez AveMount S t Mira Vista DrTassajara AveClaremont Ave A lpine R d Garvin Ave Fe li x AveYuba Ave Francisco WayVe nt ur a StElm AveRich mond AveOlive AveAlta Vista DrHarbor Vie w A v e R o s a l i n d A v e Ray Ave Sequoia AveT ulare AveRals ton AveSonoma S t Poplar AveLaurel AvePalm AveFairview AveScenic AveN A rlin g to n B lv d Ar l i ngt on Bl vdEsmond Av e Arlington B l vdDel Monte AveAqua Vista RdHi g h l a n d A v e Park AveBernhard Ave Boundaries of East Richmond Heights MAC 0 1,000 2,000500 FeetMap created 05/04/2017by Contra Costa County Department ofConservation and Development, GIS Group30 Muir Road, Martinez, CA 9455337:59:41.791N 122:07:03.756W This map or dataset was created by the Contra Costa County Department of Conservationand Development with data from the Contra Costa County GIS Program. Some base data, primarily City Limits, is derived from the CA State Board of Equalization'stax rate areas. While obligated to use this data the County assumes no responsibility forits accuracy. This map contains copyrighted information and may not be altered. It may be reproduced in its current state if the source is cited. Users of this map agree to read and accept the County of Contra Costa disclaimer of liability for geographic information.® City Boundaries Existing MAC Proposed MAC Urban Limit Line RICHMONDRICHMOND EL CERRITO SANPABLO RICHMOND East N.R.MAC Rich.Heights MACEl Sobr.§¨¦8080 §¨¦580 §¨¦8080 Exhibit A June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1379 !!! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! !!§¨¦80 Richmond El Cerrito Unincorporated County San Pablo CANYON TRAIL PARK TILLER PARK MIRA VISTA PARK POINSETT PARK HUMBOLDT PARK SOLANO PLAYLOT KERN PLAYLOT TILLER PARK CLINTON PLAYLOT BART YUBA STSAN PABLO AV38TH STKERN ST39TH STAMADOR ST40TH STEASTSHORE FRWYLASSEN STKEY BLVD41ST ST42ND ST*****MACDON A L D A V SOLANO A V 43RD STVENTURA STMCLAUGHLIN ST CLINTO N A V RAL S TO N A V SIERRA A V 37TH ST36TH STBAR R E T T A VARLINGTONBLVD NEVIN AVDIMM STTULARE AV B E R N H A R D A V 44TH STR O S A L IN D A V D IMM W Y J ORDANAVH A Z E L A VSONOMA STCARLSTONSTZARA AV EDWA R D S AVROOSEVE L T A V GARVIN A V YALE AVWILSON AV P O INSETTAVYUBA AVM OUNTSTMC LAUGHLIN STMCBRYD E A V MONO AVHUMBOLDT ST PLYMOUTH A VMONTE R EY AVFERN STI-80 E EXIT 17FELI XAVI-80EEXIT16BBISSELL A V GLENN AV SWANS WYSONOMA AVESMON D A V OHIO AV CENTER AV ANDRADE AV HUMBOLDT AVLU D WIG AV D O R E M U S A V TULLERAV46TH STLOWELL AV RHEEM AV BROOKS AVALTA PUNTA ST CHARLES AV CEDAR STC O N L O N A V RAY AV 45TH STCERRITO AV OAK AV HILLSID E AV MARIN AV NATALIE C T BI SS EL L AV NEVIN AV EASTSHORE FRWY37TH ST********** MCBRYDE AV *****36TH STCLINTO N AV OHIO AV CLINTO N A V GARVIN AV TULARE AVBARRETT A V R O O S E V E L T A V GARVIN A V SOLANO A V GLENN AV SOLANO A V*****HUMBOLDT STRALSTON AVSONOMA ST36THSTWILSON AVWILSON AV ESMOND AV RICHMOND HEIGHTS NORTH & EAST PARK PLAZA Data Source: - City of Richmond Geographic Information System (CORGIS) - Thomas Bros. Maps. Data Disclaimer - Use At Your Own Risk "Reproduced with permission granted by THOMAS BROS. MAPS. This map is copyrighted by THOMAS BROS. MAPS. It is unlawful to copy or reproduce all or any part thereof, whether for personal use or resale, without the prior, written permission of THOMAS BROS. MAPS." City and County Boundaries Parks and Other Public Areas Richmond Heights Neighborhood Council ±0 0.03 0.06 Miles Exhibit B Legend June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1380 1 Resolution No. 2017/175 IN THE MATTER OF establishing the East Richmond Heights Municipal Advisory Council WHEREAS, there is community support to establish an East Richmond Heights Municipal Advisory Council to advise the Board of Supervisors on issues of concern to the East Richmond Heights community; and WHEREAS, establishing an East Richmond Heights Municipal Advisory Council will help improve the ability of the District One Supervisor to receive advice and input on issues of concern to the East Richmond community; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT: 1.Establishment of East Richmond Heights Municipal Advisory Council. Pursuant to the authority granted by Section 31010 of the California Government Code, the East Richmond Heights Municipal Advisory Council (“Council”) is established. 2.Territorial Area. The area for which the Council will serve and discharge the following duties and powers is that area contained within the boundaries indicated on the attached map marked as Exhibit A (hereafter referred to as the “East Richmond community”). 3.Membership. The Council shall consist of five (5) members and two (2) alternates, who shall be selected and appointed by the Board of Supervisors, upon nomination by the District One Supervisor. Six (6) of these appointees shall be residents of the unincorporated East Richmond community, and one shall be a resident of either the unincorporated East Richmond community or the area within the boundaries of the East Richmond Neighborhood Council in the City of Richmond as shown on the attached map marked as Exhibit B. 4.Term of Office. Council member terms shall be coterminous with the term of office of the District One Supervisor. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1381 2 5. Removal from Office. Each appointed member of the Council serves at the pleasure of the Board of Supervisors and may be removed, at will, by a majority vote of the Board of Supervisors. 6. Council Duties and Powers. A. The Council shall advise the Board of Supervisors on services which are or may be provided to the East Richmond community by the County or other local governmental agencies. Such services include, but are not limited to, public health, safety, fire, welfare, public works and planning. B. The Council may represent the East Richmond community before the County Planning Commission, the Zoning Administrator and the Board of Supervisors on land use, planning and zoning matters. C. The Council may provide input and reports to the District One Supervisor, the Board of Supervisors, and County staff on issues of concern to the East Richmond community. D. It is understood that the Board of Supervisors is the final decision making authority with respect to issues and policies concerning the East Richmond community and that the Council shall serve solely in an advisory capacity to the District One Supervisor and the Board of Supervisors. Except as specified in 6(B) above, the Council and its individual members acting on behalf of the Council may not represent the East Richmond community to any state, other County, city, special district or school district agency or commission, or any other organization on any matter concerning the community. In addition, the Council may not, as a body, take positions on candidates for public office. 7. Quorum and Vote Necessary for Action. A quorum shall be a majority of the total number of authorized seats on the Council, not a majority of the total number of filled seats. The Council may only take action by a majority vote of the total number of authorized seats, not by a majority vote of the quorum. (With five authorized seats, a quorum is three members; three affirmative votes are necessary for action.) An alternate member(s) may vote in place of a regular member(s) who is absent. 8. Compensation. The Council members shall serve without compensation of any kind, and the Board of Supervisors shall not provide funds for the payment of Council meeting stipends or reimbursement of Council members’ expenses. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1382 3 9. Staff and Financial Support. A. The Board of Supervisors shall provide no ongoing professional or clerical staff support to the Council. B. Unless specifically authorized by the Board of Supervisors, the Council shall not receive any funds from the County to pay for any of the Council’s operating costs. 10. Council Funds. Any funds transferred to or received by the County shall be accepted pursuant to Resolution No. 2005/628 and only used for the benefit of the Council and the East Richmond community. 11. Council Establishment Not Subject to Public Vote. The issue of establishment of the Council shall not be an election item submitted to the voters of the East Richmond community. 12. Council Operation and Procedural Rules. Within the parameters of the Resolution, the Council may organize itself and operate as it determines but shall hold regular meetings at least quarterly at an established time and place. The Council meetings shall be conducted in accordance with the provisions of the “Brown Act” (Government Code sections 54950 ff.) including the pre-meeting posting of meeting calendar notices, and the “Better Government Ordinance” (County Ordinance Code , Division 25). In addition, the Council shall fully comply with the Board of Supervisors’ policy concerning conflict of interest and open meetings (Resolution No. 2002/376), the Board’s policy governing appointments to boards, committees and commissions (Resolution No. 2002/377), the Board’s policies for Municipal Advisory Councils (approved December 16, 2008), and the Political Reform Act (Government Code sections 81000 ff.) as applicable. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1383 C.79 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1384 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1385 RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2017/201 establishing the appropriation limits for the County General, County Special Districts, and County Service Areas for fiscal year 2017/2018. FISCAL IMPACT: Adopting the appropriation limits allows the County to spend its proceeds of taxes. All of the attached fiscal year 2017/2018 limits exceed expected proceeds of taxes. BACKGROUND: The attached Resolution is required by Section 7910 of the Government Code and is calculated by the County Auditor-Controller. It is required that the governing body of each local jurisdiction shall establish an appropriation limit for each jurisdiction pursuant to Article XIII-B of the California Constitution. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The County will fail to meet the requirements laid out in Article XIII-B of the California Constitution. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS Contact: Jennifer Webber (925) 335-8610 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: , Deputy cc: C. 80 To:Board of Supervisors From:Robert Campbell, Auditor-Controller Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:Appropriation Limits for Fiscal Year 2017/18 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1386 CLERK'S ADDENDUM RELISTED to June 20, 2017. ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2017/201 Exhibit A FY 17-18 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1387 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 06/13/2017 by the following vote: AYE: NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2017/201 Appropriation Limits for County, County Special Districts, and County Service Areas for 2017/2018. WHEREAS, Section 7910 of the Government Code requires that each year the governing body of each local jurisdiction shall establish an appropriations limit for each jurisdiction for the following year pursuant to Article XIII-B of the California Constitution; and WHEREAS, according to Article XIII-B of the California Constitution (Section 8 subd.e(2)) the change in the cost of living shall be either the percentage change in California per capita personal income from the preceding year, or the percentage change in the local assessment roll from the preceding year for the jurisdiction due to the addition of local non-residential new construction; and WHEREAS, the percentage change due to the addition of local non-residential new construction is not available for the County, County Special Districts and County Service Areas, therefore, the County Auditor-Controller has calculated the appropriation limits using the change factors most advantageous as permitted by Article XIII-B of the California Constitution; and WHEREAS, the County Auditor-Controller has prepared the attached report and accompanying schedule, designated Exhibit A, regarding the proposed County General, County Special District, and County Service Area appropriation limits for fiscal year 2017/2018. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY THAT the attached Exhibit A percentage changes over the prior year are selected and appropriation limits established for the County General, County Special Districts, and County Service Areas for the fiscal year 2017/2018. Contact: Jennifer Webber (925) 335-8610 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: , Deputy cc: June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1388 Exhibit A 2017-2018 County General and Special District Appropriation Limits 2017-18 2016-17 Change 2017-18 District Fund Limit Factor Limit County General/Library 1003 19,899,587,179 1.0490 20,874,666,951 Contra Costa Fire 2020 3,824,301,005 1.0456 3,998,689,131 Crockett-Carquinez Fire 2028 371,257,246 1.0462 388,409,331 Co Service Area L-100 2401 6,647,408 1.0462 6,954,518 Co Service Area M-1 2470 505,477 1.0462 528,830 6,898,345 1.0604 7,315,005 Co Service Area M-16 2488 67,157 1.0462 70,260 Co Service Area M-17 2489 721,660 1.0462 755,001 Co Service Area M-20 2492 109,737 1.0462 114,807 Co Service Area RD-4 2494 335,809 1.0462 351,323 Flood Control Zone 1 2521 3,683,442 1.0669 3,929,864 Flood Control Zone 7 2527 24,646,060 1.0427 25,698,447 Flood Control Drainage A-13 2552 1,308,177 1.0462 1,368,615 Flood Control Drainage A-10 2554 1,806,162 1.0386 1,875,880 Storm Drainage Z-16 2583 1,123,154 1.0497 1,178,975 Co Service Area P-5 2655 1,401,202 1.0462 1,465,938 Co Service Area R-4 2751 910,678 1.0462 952,751 Co Service Area R-7A 2758 1,755,105 (1)1.0462 1,836,191 (1)Amount shown is the District's limit with a November 8, 2016 voter approved override to $1,650,000, plus growth, for fiscal years 2015-2016 through 2018-2019. Co Service Area M-29 2475 & 4232 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1389 RECOMMENDATION(S): ACCEPT Employment & Human Services Department Community Services Bureau 2017-2018 Planning Calendar, as recommended by the Employment and Human Services Director. FISCAL IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND: Head Start Performance Standard 1302.101 Management System mandates that the Head Start grantee develop a plan for program operations and that this plan be reviewed and approved by the Head Start governing body. The Board of Supervisors is Contra Costa County Head Start's governing body. This board order accepts the 2017-2018 planning calendar for the Community Services Bureau, covering milestones for various Head Start and Community Action programs for the year. The planning calendar was approved by the Head Start Policy Council on May 17, 2017. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If not accepted, Department will not be in compliance with Head Start regulations. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: CSB (925) 681-6304 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stephanie Mello, Deputy cc: Carolyn Nguyen, Katherine Mason, Cassandra Youngblood C. 81 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:2017-18 Employment & Human Services Community Services Bureau Planning Calendar June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1390 CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: The Employment & Human Services Department Community Services Bureau supports three of Contra Costa County’s community outcomes - Outcome 1: “Children Ready for and Succeeding in School,” Outcome 3: “Families that are Economically Self-sufficient,” and, Outcome 4: “Families that are Safe, Stable, and Nurturing.” These outcomes are achieved by offering comprehensive services, including high quality early childhood education, nutrition, and health services to low-income children throughout Contra Costa County. ATTACHMENTS 2017-18 CSB Planning Calendar June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1391 2017-18 CSB Planning Calendar ACTIVITY SPONSOR JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER JANUARY FEBRUARY Communication Camilla Schedule & Conduct Annual BOS Meetings FHS Committee Presentation Reports Monique Monthly Report to BOS/CAO E-Rate Sung E-Rate BEAR (Billed Entity Applicant Reimbursement) /472 E-Rate RFI E-Rate Form 470 Invoicing USAC/Service Provider for Reimbursement RFI for Next Year's Technology Needs RFI for Tele- Communication/Int ernet/Internal Connection Action: BOS Approval for Incoming Funds USAC Conference CLOUDS Sung CLOUDS Staff Training Review Contract by County Counsel Facilities/Center Health and Safety Sung Quarterly Deep Cleaning EHS Annual Deep Cleaning HS Certification for Playground Safety Inspector (Expires Every 4 Years) Quarterly Deep Cleaning EHS Quarterly Deep Cleaning EHS Health & Safety Officer Committee Meeting Health & Safety Officer Committee Meeting Health & Safety Officer Committee Meeting Emergency Preparedness Training and Great Shake Out Statewide Earthquake Drill Families Katharine Quarterly Family Newsletter Quarterly Family Newsletter Quarterly Family Newsletter Monthly Early Closure Letters Monthly Parent Meetings PD/PY Calendar Given to Families PD/PY 1 Week Winter Break Pam Provide Family Handbooks to Families Pedestrian Safety Training Required Begin Kindergarten Transitions/ Training BOARD OF SUPERVISORS BUSINESS SYSTEMS COMMUNICATION Community Work Days Open Houses E-Rate Form 471 2017-18 Planning Calendar for Community Services Bureau Approved by Policy Council - Approved by Board of Supervisor - 1 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1392 2017-18 CSB Planning Calendar ACTIVITY SPONSOR JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER JANUARY FEBRUARY Staff Camilla Vacation Request due for 4th Quarter Vacation Request Due for 1st Quarter Update external calendar meetings Quarterly Staff Newsletter SAM Quarterly Report Quarterly Staff Newsletter SAM Quarterly Report Quarterly Staff Newsletter Janissa Monthly Cluster meetings Bi-monthly All- Cluster meetings Bi-monthly All- Cluster meetings Bi-monthly All- Cluster meetings Bi-monthly All- Cluster meetings Regional Office (RO)Katharine Monthly Calls with the RO School Readiness (SR) Visit for RO 24 Class Waiver Letter Renewal Child Outcomes Year-End Report to RO Community Assessment 2017-2021 Major Update Every 5 years Carolyn N Prepare Community Assessment Updates Narrative for Continuation Grant Submit Executive Summary with HS/EHS Continuation Grant Give Kids a Smile Day Pam Give Kids a Smile Day (GKSD) - Planning Meetings with Contra Costa Dental Society, Children's Oral Health Program Give Kids a Smile Day Preparation and Implementation of GKSD Plan Every Day in Month of January Give Kids a Smile Day Event- February 2, 2018 (1st Friday of the Month of February) Healthy and Active Lifestyle Isabel National Food Day - October 24th Family Engagement Pam Monthly Parent Meetings / Trainings Back to School Night Collect WOTYC Plans for Centers EHS: Take home family activities: Large muscle HS: Take home family social and development activities Second Step Home Link Activities Weekly Reading Advantage Workshops (year round) Male Involvement Quarterly Meeting Male Involvement Quarterly Meeting Male Involvement Quarterly Meeting Researching Community Assessment Updates ESL Classes at GMC Family Financial Fitness Workshops (Year Long) Make Parenting A Pleasure Curriculum (Month Sept-June) Fall Harvest Festivals Family Financial Fitness Workshops (Year Long) COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT 2017-18 Planning Calendar for Community Services Bureau Approved by Policy Council - Approved by Board of Supervisor - 2 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1393 2017-18 CSB Planning Calendar ACTIVITY SPONSOR JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER JANUARY FEBRUARY CSD Meetings and Trainings Christina 2017 CAP Annual Convention- Philadelphia, PA Quarterly CAC Meeting Quarterly CAC Meeting Quarterly CAC Meeting EOC Meetings/Events Christina Monthly: EOC Business Meeting Present 2018-19 Community Action Plan (CAP) to the EOC Election of EOC Executive Committee Officers Present the 2017 Annual Report to EOC Annual Orientation of New EOC Members Brown Act/Ethics Training Certificate Due to the Clerk of BOS Subcontractors Christina EOC Members Begin 2017 Subcontractor Onsite Monitoring Continue Subcontractor Onsite Monitoring EOC RFI Process for 2018 CSBG Contracts EOC Subcommitte to Review CSBG Proposals for 2018 Subcontractor Contracts 2018 Awawrded Subcontractors and CSBG Budget presented to the EOC Roundtable Reporting/Audits Christina 20th: Bi-Monthly Expenditure Due to CSD (May & June) 20th: Bi-Monthly Expenditure Due to CSD (Jul & Aug) 20th: Bi-Monthly Expenditure Due to CSD (Sept & Oct) 20th: Bi-Monthly Expenditure Due to CSD (Nov & Dec 2017) 20th: Annual Programmatic Reports due: CSD 801 NPI, CSD 295- CCR Due Year-End Budget Modification Developed w/Fiscal Subcommittee to CSD CSBG Annual site Visit/Audit by CSD 15th: Last day to Submit Budget Modification to CSD (If necessary) Action: Submit 2017 EOC Annual Report to the BOS EESD Contracts Carolyn N Management Bulletin for CDE Refunding Application Application Due for CDE Refunding Application For Next Fiscal Year CDE Rosters Due Janissa Begin Screenings and DRDP Assessments Parent-Teacher Conferences for FD/FY Complete ECERS/ITERS by 11/30 Parent- Teacher Conferences PD/PY Complete DRDP Summary of Findings by 12/30 LIHEAP/DOE/LIWP Sung Begin LIHEAP Contract with CSD for PY 2018 End of PY LIHEAP Contract Begin on DOE Contract with CSD for PY 2017 End of PY DOE Contract CONTRACTS COMMUNITY SERVICES BLOCK GRANT Prepare, Distribute and Conduct Parent Survey for Alternative Payment Programs Prepare, Distribute and Conduct DRDP Parent Survey for Center Based Programs 2017-18 Planning Calendar for Community Services Bureau Approved by Policy Council - Approved by Board of Supervisor - 3 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1394 2017-18 CSB Planning Calendar ACTIVITY SPONSOR JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER JANUARY FEBRUARY CSBG Christina Begin CSBG Contract with CSD for PY 2018 Partnerships Ericka Begin Contract Renewals for Contracts Due in November PD/PY Centers Open Begin Contract Renewals for Contracts Due in December and January Action: BOS Approval of All Contracts Eligibility/ Enrollment Sarah Monthly Enrollment Report Due to HSES by the 7th & Purge Protocol Completed by the 5th Weekly 30-day Full Enrollment Checks and Reports New Federal Income Guidelines Issued PD/PY Classes Begin Recruitment Sarah Review/ Revise Recruitment Materials Begin Major Recruitment Drive Monthly - Purge Waitlist Selection Sarah Hold Selection Criteria Meeting with Staff, Parents, and Program Services Subcommittee Action: PC Approves Selection Criteria and Recruitment Plan Action: BOS Approves Selection Criteria and Recruitment Plan Attandance & Planning Sarah Monthly Attandance Report for BOS/PC Reports Eric CDE 4th Quarterly Report Due Operating Information in the Comprehensive Annual Financial Budget Input in GABI Due to ACF for Next PY CDE 1st Quarterly Report Due Audit Report Due to State (CDE) by November 15th County Single Audit begins CDE 2nd Quarterly Report Due Baseline Budget (BFM) and Budget Narrative Due Fiscal Reports to PC & BOS County Year-End Close-Out Continues: Submission of Journals, Accruals, and Deferrals to Auditor's Office Complete Risk Assessment for Each Subrecipient Child Development Audit Begins Single Audit Certification of Subrecipients Cut-off for Encumbrance of HS/EHS 2017 Funds Personnel Cost Forcasting (PCF) Report due Stage 2 & CAPP Reports Due to CDE (20th of each month) CSBG Report Due to CSD (bi-monthly due on the 20th) CSBG Report Due to CSD (bi-monthly due on the 20th) CSBG Report Due to CSD (bi-monthly due on the 20th) Mid-year Projections Due to CAO CSBG Report Due to CSD (bi-monthly due on the 20th) County Year-End Close-Out Begins: Cut Off for Encumbrances Adjustment Deposit Permit Annual Financial Status Report SF- 425 Due to ACF Semi-Annual Financial Status Report SF-425 Due to ACF Head Start & Early Head Start Fiscal Year Begins FISCAL ELIGIBILITY, RECRUITMENT, SELECTION, ENROLLMENT, AND ATTENDANCE (ERSEA) CS Desk Guide and Forms review (Every 2 years - 2017) 2017-18 Planning Calendar for Community Services Bureau Approved by Policy Council - Approved by Board of Supervisor - 4 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1395 2017-18 CSB Planning Calendar ACTIVITY SPONSOR JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER JANUARY FEBRUARY Budgets Eric State/County Fiscal Year Begins July 1st End of the Year Budget Adjustments Due to Auditor Controller's Office Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Due to Auditor Controller's Office Indirect Cost Rate Proposal Due to US Dept. of Health & Human Services Current Year's Budget Adjustments Due to Auditor Controller's Office CACFP CMIPS Submitted Finalize 2018 Operational and T & TA Budget for HS/EHS; 2018 Budget for PC Discussion and Approval HS/EHS Grants (09CH9115)Nasim Conduct Grant Writing Process with Assigned Team Members (Including: Goals & Objectives) Action: Request PC Approval for Submission of Full HS & EHS Grants, Budgets and Goals & Objectives. Action: Upload Grants Through HSES Present Grant Cycle Process Overview to PC at Orientation HS/EHS Grants (09CH9115) (cont'd) Program G/O Updates Semi- Annual Report Disseminated to Staff, Department Director, PC, and BOS Program G/O Updates Semi- Annual Report Disseminated to Staff, Department Director, PC, and BOS EHS-CCP Grant #1 (09HP0012)Receive Funding Guidance Letter EHS-CCP Grant #2 (09HP000111) Receive funding guidance letter Get PC/BOS approval Due Dec. 1 Tracking Reni Monthly Personnel Tracking reports General HIPAA Awareness Training (upon hire and bi- annual for applicable staff) Permit expiration notices to staff Permit expiration notices to staff Permit expiration notices to staff Monitoring Reni Ongoing Personnel File Monitoring including partners Performance Review notices Performance Review notices Performance Review notices Positions Control Review Performance Review notices Monitor transcripts TAT Monitor transcripts TAT HUMAN RESOURCES GRANTS 2017-18 Planning Calendar for Community Services Bureau Approved by Policy Council - Approved by Board of Supervisor - 5 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1396 2017-18 CSB Planning Calendar ACTIVITY SPONSOR JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER JANUARY FEBRUARY PD/PY Reni Return-To-Work Letter to Laid off PD/PY staff (August 1st) PD/PY Employees return Reporting Reni Program Information Report LIC 500 to Licensing LIC 500 to Licensing Risk Management Loss Control Report - Share w/Senior Mgmt. OSHA Reports posting at all sites Required Training Reni Ongoing Sexual Harassment Awareness Training (line staff every 3 years and supervisor every 2 years) National Voter Registration Act Training (Annually July/Aug.) CSB Policies and Procedures Review by all staff Chronological Supervision & Progressive Discipline Training Preventive Health & Safety (EMSA) (At time of hire once or twice per year) CSB Protocol for Hourly Head Count and Transition training for staff Civil Rights Training (Every 2 years Jan./Feb.) Ongoing new employee orientation Licensing Orientation (At time of hire for SS) First Aid CPR (Every 2 years ongoing) Integrated Pest Management Training (Annually Sept./Oct.) Mandated Reporter (At time of hire) CSB Standards of Conduct Labor Reni Local 1 presentation at NEO (monthly) CSB/Local One Informational meeting Recruitment Reni Ongoing recruitment at One- Stops Career Intro Career Fair Legislation Nasim Quarterly Report at Senior Management Meeting Quarterly Report at Senior Management Meeting Quarterly Report at Senior Management Meeting Monitoring/Review Carolyn/Nelly Monthly Quality Control Review with DCD (3rd Thursday) CSD Console Bi- Annual On-Site Monitoring Visit Monthly Quality Control Review of Utility Assistance Meetings/Conferences Carolyn/Nelly Monthly Utility Assistance Meeting Quarterly Local Service Provider Meeting Quarterly Local Service Provider Meeting Meetings/Conferences (cont'd) Monthly LIHEAP/DOE Meeting with DCD Reports Sam/Sung 15th: EARS Monthly Report ON-GOING MONITORING LOW INCOME HOME ENERGY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM/DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY/LOW INCOME WEATHERIZATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM LEGISLATION 2017-18 Planning Calendar for Community Services Bureau Approved by Policy Council - Approved by Board of Supervisor - 6 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1397 2017-18 CSB Planning Calendar ACTIVITY SPONSOR JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER JANUARY FEBRUARY Monitoring Sarah 1st Period Monitoring Begins: Education, N&E, H&S, and CS CLASS Monitoring Begins CLASS Monitoring Ends 2nd Period Monitoring Begins: Education, N&E, H&S, and CS Semi-Annual Child Safety Checklist Reports Sarah Present 2nd Period Semi-Annual Report to PC, CAO, ACF, Senior Managers, Site Supervisors, CS Managers, Partners, and Staff Root Cause Analysis Present 1st Period Semi-Annual Report to PC, CAO, ACF, Senior Managers, Site Supervisors, CS Managers, Partners, and Staff Communication Ericka Quarterly Grantee and Delegate Meeting Annual Partner Director Meeting Community Based Partnerships MOU Status Check Quarterly Grantee and Delegate Meeting Pedestrian Safety Training Required Begin Kindergarten Transitions/ Trainings Strategic Planning Camilla Revisit 2016-2018 Strategic Initiatives Finalize Strategic Plan, Changes Including Timeline, Outcomes, and Measurements Strategic Plan Updates to Staff and PC Planning Calendar Carolyn N Request Planning Calendar Updates from Senior Management leads (As Assigned/Up- Date assignments) Leads Review and Update Sections Policies & Procedures Bi-annually (2017-18) Nasim Distribute Hard Copies to Centers/ Administrative Offices. Post on the Intranet. Conduct Annual Staff Training on Service Plans and P&P's Distribute Assignments to Senior Managers/CS Managers Review Team PARTNERSHIPS - CHILD CARE PLANNING POLICY COUNCIL 2017-18 Planning Calendar for Community Services Bureau Approved by Policy Council - Approved by Board of Supervisor - 7 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1398 2017-18 CSB Planning Calendar ACTIVITY SPONSOR JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER JANUARY FEBRUARY PC Meetings and Trainings Pam PC/BOS Joint Training Planning Begins Recognition of Outgoing PC Members PC Orientation (off- site) on Saturday September (TBD) and Election of New PC Executive Committee PC/BOS Joint Training Make-Up PC Orientation Ethics/Brown Act Video Training Due Finalize Subcommittees No PC Meeting Facilitative Leadership Training No PC Meeting Monthly Subcommittee Meetings (except July and December) Begin Recruitment for Subcommittee Annual Report Nasim Disseminate/Distrib ute Annual Report to Public and Staff Program Information Report Sarah Quarterly Meeting CSB & FBHS Upload PIR by August 31st Submit to BOS in CAO Report; Present at SAM, Sr. Mgmt. & Cluster Mgmts.. Quarterly Meeting CSB & FBHS Present to PC Quarterly Meeting CSB & FBHS Equipment and Files Carlos Annual County Equipment Inventory Report Confirmation Program Year prior to Last Program Year Drop Files to Warehouse for Storage Prior Program Year Archived Files Stored at Sites for One Year Goals Janissa Present Final Update of SR Goals to PC, BOS, Mgmt., staff Data Entry Completed 10/15 for FD/FY PD/PY DRDP Data entry 11/30 Present new SR goals to PC Subcommittee, PC, BOS,ACF, SR.Mgnt. Reports Janissa Final DRDP Outcomes Report to PC, BOS, ACF, Senior Mgmt., & all staff First DRDP Outcomes Report for Current Program Year to PC, BOS, ACF, & Senior Mgmt. 2nd DRDP Due Transitions: Into, Throughout & Out of Program Janissa In-Service for FD/FY Teachers Education P&Ps In-Service for PD/PY Teachers Kinder-Readiness Activities: Parent Meetings, RMTK Kinder-Readiness Registration Information to Parents and Visits to Kinder Classes Self Assessment Activities Ericka Recruit PC Self- Assessment Sub- Committee Begin Self- Assessment Process Planning Identify Sites and Classrooms for Self- Assessment Conduct Self- Assessments (CSB/FBHS) Self Assessment Activities (cont'd) Present Process to PC and Broaden Subcommittee Membership Develop Self- Assessment Schedule and Send Out Notification SELF ASSESSMENT SCHOOL READINESS (SR) RECORD KEEPING & REPORTING 2017-18 Planning Calendar for Community Services Bureau Approved by Policy Council - Approved by Board of Supervisor - 8 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1399 2017-18 CSB Planning Calendar ACTIVITY SPONSOR JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER JANUARY FEBRUARY Form Self- Assessment Teams for Review at CSB and Delegate Agency Sites Corrective Action Plan (If Needed) Train Community Volunteers/PC Subcommittee Members Families Carolyn/Nelly Monitoring/Reports Nelly Quarterly File Monitoring Due Fiscal Audit Quarterly File Monitoring Due Quarterly File Monitoring Due Meetings/Conferences Carolyn/Nelly Monthly CSAM & Unit Meetings CAPPA Annual Conference CALWORKS STAGE 2/ALTERNATIVE PAYMENT PROGRAM Prepare Distribute and Conduct Parent Survey 2017-18 Planning Calendar for Community Services Bureau Approved by Policy Council - Approved by Board of Supervisor - 9 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1400 2017-18 CSB Planning Calendar MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE Attend BOS Meeting for PD/PY Layoffs WOTYC BOS Proclamation Community Action Month BOS Proclamation Invite Board Members to Centers for Week of the Young Child USAC PIA Review E-Rate/USAC PIA Review Review Prior Years E- Rate Form 471 Grant Application E-Rate Form 486 CLOUDS Staff Training CLOUDS Renewal Quarterly Deep Cleaning EHS Health & Safety Officer Committee Meeting Family Handbook Updates (Every 2 years, 2017- 2019) Quarterly Family Newsletter Part-Day Closure Letters to Families Year-end celebrations Child Abuse/DV Prevention Training Required PD/PY 1 Week Spring Break (Alligned with Local School Districts) Community Work Days 2017-18 Planning Calendar for Community Services Bureau Approved by Policy Council - Approved by Board of Supervisor - 10 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1401 2017-18 CSB Planning Calendar MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE Vacation Request Due for 2nd Quarter Vacation Request due for 3rd Quarter SAM Quarterly Report Quarterly Staff Newsletter SAM Quarterly Report Bi-monthly All- Cluster meetings Bi-monthly All- Cluster meetings School Readiness (SR) visit for RO Child Outcomes Baseline Report to RO Child Outcomes Mid- Year Report to RO Finalize Community Assessment Action: Present Community Assessment Executive Summary Report for PC, BOS, and Staff Give Kids a Smile Day Post Meeting National Nutrition Month Annual California Dietetic Association Meeting & Exhibition National Fruit and Veggie Day (June 17th is Eat All Your Veggies Day) WOTYC Celebrations EHS: Take home family activities: Large muscle EHS: Take home family activities: Large muscle HS: Take home family social and development activities Collect Year-End Celebration Plans for the Center Male Involvement Quarterly Meeting End of Year Male Involvement Celebration Researching Community Assessment Updates ESL Classes at GMC Family Financial Fitness Workshops (Year Long) Make Parenting A Pleasure Curriculum (Month Sept-June) Year-End Celebrations 2017-18 Planning Calendar for Community Services Bureau Approved by Policy Council - Approved by Board of Supervisor - 11 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1402 2017-18 CSB Planning Calendar MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE Quarterly CAC Meeting EOC Staff Present 2018 Legislative Platform Adopted by BOS to EOC Subcommittee Begin Preparation for the May Community Action Month EOC Outreach Event Community Action Month: EOC Outreach Event Collect Form 700 from PC Members and Staff Form 700 due to Clerk of BOS 20th: Bi-Monthly Expenditure Due to CSD (Jan &Feb 2017) 20th: Bi-Monthly Expenditure Due to CSD (Mar & Apr) 1st: CSBG Information System (IS) Report due to CSD (Jan-Dec 2017) 31st: 2017 CSBG Close Out Report Due to CSD Submit Self- Evaluation to CDE on June 1st. Compile DRDP Parent Surveys by Contract Review Parent Survey Results & Share with Senior Mgmt. BOS, and PC Draft Self-Evaluation Action Plan 2017-18 Planning Calendar for Community Services Bureau Approved by Policy Council - Approved by Board of Supervisor - 12 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1403 2017-18 CSB Planning Calendar MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE Begin Contract Renewals for Contracts Due in July (Pending Slots) PD/PY Classes End Eligibility & Enrollment Clinics Submit Request for Flyers to be Mailed with Public Benefit Quarterly Reports Establish Procedure and Timelines for Rollover Purge Over-Income Waiver List Slot Planning for Next PY Slots Map Finalized for Next PY and Distribute Countuy Performance Report Due CDE 3rd Quarterly Report Due Report the Results of Prior Year Single Audit to PC Site Review of Delegate Agency Due Final financial Status Report SF-425 Due to ACF CSBG IS Form Due 3/1 CSBG Report Due to CSD (bi-monthly due on the 20th) CSBG Report Due to CSD (bi-monthly due on the 20th) Continue Recruitment Drive 2017-18 Planning Calendar for Community Services Bureau Approved by Policy Council - Approved by Board of Supervisor - 13 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1404 2017-18 CSB Planning Calendar MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE Subrecipient & Contractor Determination Checklist State/County Fiscal Year Ends June 30th Develop Grant Timeline in Conjunction with PC/BOS Meeting Dates for Approval Requests Present to PC: Review of Continuation Grant Cycle and PC Involvement Share Grantee Timeline Tasks with Delegate Announce Continuation Grant to PC, Including Year-End Monitoring Results (CSB Director's Report) Get PC/BOS Approvals Due April 1 Performance Review notices Performance Review notices Personnel Budget review. Monitor transcripts TAT 2017-18 Planning Calendar for Community Services Bureau Approved by Policy Council - Approved by Board of Supervisor - 14 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1405 2017-18 CSB Planning Calendar MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE Action: Board Order to Layoff PD/PY Staff Action: PD/PY layoff approval by PC Order of Layoff PD/PY Staff Notice of Proposed Action for Layoff Summer closure & PD/PY Staff Layoff Notice of Action for Layoff LIC 500 to Licensing Remove OSHA Reports posting from sites LIC 500 to Licensing CAP Training Confidentiality Training (Annually Apr./May) Illness and Injury Prevention plan Review Child Abuse Awareness Training 15 Hours of Professional Development (Ongoing) Meet & Confer Layoff PD/PY Staff Warning Letter to Layoff PD/PY staff Annual Bid CSB/Local One Informational meeting Recruitment CSU East Bay job fair Recruitment CCC & Mills College and DVC job fair Recruitment Solano Community College job fair Career Intro Career Fair (May) Career Intro Career Fair Report on Federal Budget Quarterly Report at Senior Management Meeting Report to Sr. Management on May's Legislative Revision CSD Console Bi- Annual On-Site Monitoring Visit CSD Annual On-Site Monitoring Visit Quarterly Local Service Provider Meeting Quarterly Local Service Provider Meeting Energy Annual Convention LOW INCOME HOME ENERGY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM/DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY/LOW INCOME WEATHERIZATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 2017-18 Planning Calendar for Community Services Bureau Approved by Policy Council - Approved by Board of Supervisor - 15 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1406 2017-18 CSB Planning Calendar MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE CLASS Monitoring Ends CLASS Monitoring Ends End Monitoring Semi-Annual Child Safety Checklist Root Cause Analysis Review/Update Content of Monitoring Tools and Handbooks Review Slot Map Plans and Update for New Period Schedule for Center Monitoring and Sample Size Calculation for Files and Classrooms Quarterly Grantee and Delegate Meeting Quarterly Grantee and Delegate Meeting Child Abuse/DV Prevention Training Required Fees/9400 Trainings for State Partners Report Progress on CSB Strategic Plan Send to SAM for Review by the 15th Present Planning Calendar to PC Program Services Subcommittee Action:Request PC approval of Planning Calendar Action: BOS Approval Present Updates to Staff Senior Managers/ Managers Send Updates to the Analyst Analyst Gets SAM Approval Enlist PC Sub- Committee for Review/Input to Service Plans and P&P's and Analyst to Finalize and Gets Final SAM Approval Action: Submit to PC and BOS for Approval /Order Copies of Approved P&P's for Centers/Administrat ion and Post on CSB Intranet 2017-18 Planning Calendar for Community Services Bureau Approved by Policy Council - Approved by Board of Supervisor - 16 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1407 2017-18 CSB Planning Calendar MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE PC/EOC Orientation Planning Begins Begin Annual Report Process and Gather Content from Sr. Mgrs. and CSMs Finalize Annual Report /Annual Report Final Approval from SAM Annual Report Final Approval from SAM Present/Distribute Annual Report to PC and BOS/CAO Quarterly Meeting CSB & FBHS Release Files Past Destruction Date to County for Shredding Present Mid-Year SR Updates to PC, BOS Mgmt., and staff 2nd DRDP Outcomes Report to PC, BOS, ACF, & Senior Mgmt. 3rd DRDP Due Prepare Kindergarten Transition Packets Distribution of SR Packets (Transition to Kindergarten) Action: Submit Final Report and Obtain Approval of Corrective Action Plans as Necessary (ACF/PC/BOS/CSB Director) Link any Self- Assessment Findings to G&O's for Continuation Grant and T & TA Plan 2017-18 Planning Calendar for Community Services Bureau Approved by Policy Council - Approved by Board of Supervisor - 17 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1408 2017-18 CSB Planning Calendar MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE Review Stage 2/CAPP Program Handbook Update Stage 2/CAPP Program Handbook Distribute Stage 2/CAPP Program Handbook Quarterly File Monitoring Due 2017-18 Planning Calendar for Community Services Bureau Approved by Policy Council - Approved by Board of Supervisor - 18 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1409 RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2017/214 agreeing to comply with the Surplus Land Act in order to receive certain funds distributed by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission pursuant to Government Code section 54220 et seq. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: On November 18, 2015, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) adopted Resolution No. 4202 outlining the programming policy and project selection criteria for the second round of the One Bay Area Grant Program (OBAG 2). The MTC makes various funds, including regional federal funds, available to local jurisdictions through the OBAG 2 program. One requirement of MTC Resolution No. 4202, is that a county receiving funds under the OBAG 2 program, must adopt a resolution agreeing to comply with the terms of Surplus Land Act, California Government Code section 54220 et seq. The Surplus Land Act was most recently amended in 2014 by Assembly Bill 2135. In order to submit projects to MTC for consideration of federal funding, Contra Costa County must adopt a resolution agreeing to comply with the Surplus Land Act. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Karen Laws (925) 313-2228 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stephanie Mello, Deputy cc: C. 82 To:Board of Supervisors From:Julia R. Bueren, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:Resolution Agreeing to Comply with the Surplus Land Act County Wide June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1410 CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Contra Costa County will not be eligible for OBAG2 funding. Contra Costa County is slated to receive $5,600,000 in funds through OBAG2. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2017/214 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution No. 2017/214 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1411 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 06/13/2017 by the following vote: AYE: John Gioia Candace Andersen Diane Burgis Karen Mitchoff Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2017/214 Resolution of the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors agreeing to comply with the Surplus Land Act, Government Code section 54220 et seq. WHEREAS, the San Francisco region has the highest housing costs in the United States; and WHEREAS, the Bay Area produced less than 30% of the need for low and moderate income housing units from 2007-2014; and WHEREAS, there are limited funding sources available to secure land for the construction of low and moderate income housing; and WHEREAS, public lands can play a critical role in increasing the supply of land for affordable housing; and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission adopted Resolution No. 4202, outlining the programming policy and project selection criteria for the One Bay Area Grant Program (OBAG 2), including certain requirements to access these funds; and WHEREAS, one requirement of MTC Resolution No. 4202 is that a county receiving funds under the OBAG 2 program must adopt a resolution agreeing to comply with the terms of Surplus Land Act, California Government Code section 54220 et seq. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors as follows: The County of Contra Costa agrees to comply with the terms of Surplus Land Act, California Government Code section 54220 et seq., as exists now or may be amended in the future. Contact: Karen Laws (925) 313-2228 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stephanie Mello, Deputy cc: 5 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1412 C.82 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1413 RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve the list of providers recommended by Contra Costa Health Plan's Peer Review and Credentialing Committee on May 9, 2017, and by the Health Services Director, as required by the State Departments of Health Care Services and Managed Health Care, and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. FISCAL IMPACT: Not applicable. BACKGROUND: The National Committee on Quality Assurance (NCQA) requires that evidence of Board of Supervisors approval must be contained within each CCHP provider’s credentials file. Approval of this list of providers as recommended by the CCHP Medical Director, will enable the Contra Costa Health Plan to comply with this requirement. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this action is not approved, Contra Costa Health Plan’s Providers would not be appropriately credentialed and not be in compliance with the NCQA. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Patricia Tanquary, 925-313-6004 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stephanie Mello, Deputy cc: Tasha Scott, Marcy Wilhelm, Heather Wong C. 83 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:Approve New and Recredentialing Providers in Contra Costa Health Plan’s Community Provider Network June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1414 ATTACHMENTS Attachment June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1415 Contra Costa Health Plan Providers Approved by Peer Review and Credentialing Committee May 9, 2017 CREDENTIALING PROVIDERS MAY 2017 Name Specialty Assenzio, Bradley, BCBA Behavior Analysis Baird, Melissa, BCBA Behavior Analysis Bush, Jacob, BCBA Behavior Analysis Christian, Elaine, CNM Mid-Level OB/GYN Cox, Lauren, BCBA Behavior Analysis de Edwards, Sharon, M.D. OB/GYN Denevi, Denise, BCBA Behavior Analysis Guest, Stephanie, NP Mid-Level Urgent Care Harris, Julie, BCBA Behavior Analysis Hernandez, Danielle, BCBA Behavior Analysis Hewell, Joseph, BCBA Behavior Analysis Hines, Marcus, BCBA Behavior Analysis Jansse, Stephanie, MFT Mental Health Service Jones, Dean, LCSW Mental Health Services Jule-Frost, Virginia, MFT Mental Health Services Khaw, Jennifer, MFT Mental Health Services Kliger-Enkin, Laura, BCBA Behavior Analysis Kops, Richard, M.D. Pulmonary Disease Lindler, Vanessa, BCBA Behavior Analysis Lynch, Bonney, LAc Acupuncture Matter, Ashley, BCBA Behavior Analysis Mooney, Robert, M.D. Urgent Care Nguyen, Anh, LAc Acupuncture Pelzer, Hideko, LAc Acupuncture Ponio, Reginald, BCBA, M.Ed Behavior Analysis Rizzo, Theresa, Psy.D Behavior Analysis Shabani, Bahram, BCBA-D, PhD Behavior Analysis Watts, Erin, BCBA Behavior Analysis CREDENTIALING ORGANIZATIONAL PROVIDER MAY 2017 Provider Name Provide the Following Services Location Anju Sajheesh dba: Neogen Care Home Health Hayward June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1416 Contra Costa Health Plan Providers Approved by Peer Review and Credentialing Committee May 9, 2017 Page 2 of 2 RECREDENTIALING PROVIDERS MAY 2017 Name Specialty Bhat, Anita, M.D. Endocrinology Chance, Robert, DC Chiropractic Medicine Contreras, David, M.D. Surgery – Orthopaedic Fang, Ming, M.D. Gastroenterology Greenberg, Alissa, BCBA-D Behavior Analysis Hill, Toby, HAD Hearing Aid Dispensing Horwitz, Jessica, NP Mid-Level HIV/Aids Ingram, Angela, NP Mid-Level Allergy & Immunology Isaacs, Mark, M.D. Phlebology Johnson, Sara, M.D. OB/GYN Korah, Mariam, M.D. Radiation Oncology Michlitsch, Michael, M.D. Surgery – Orthopaedic Narsinh, Kiran, M.D. Gastroenterology Prasad. Gautam, M.D. Radiation Oncology Sato, Ronald, M.D. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery – Hyperbaric Medicine Serebrakian, Armen, M.D. Otolaryngology (ENT) Stanley, Guadalupe, PA Primary Care Family Medicine Torres, Joseph, PA Mid-Level Orthopaedic Surgery Assistant Wasserman, Ronald, M.D. Infectious Disease Waters, Tiffany, PA Mid-Level Orthopaedic Surgery Assistant RECREDENTIALING ORGANIZATIONAL PROVIDERS MAY 2017 Provider Name Provide the Following Services Location Pankaj K. Patel, DMD & Shailesh K. Patel, DDS A Professional Corporation dba: Salida Surgery Center Outpatient Surgery (Dental) Salida Ygnacio Valley Care Center, LLC dba: Kindred Nursing & Rehabilitation - Ygnacio Valley Skilled Nursing Facility Walnut Creek bopl-May 9, 2017 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1417 RECOMMENDATION(S): RECEIVE Civil Grand Jury Report No. 1702, entitled "Emergency Mass Care and Shelter: Are We Ready?" (attached), and FORWARD to the County Administrator for response. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: On May 11, 2017 the 2016/17 Civil Grand Jury filed the above referenced report. Per standard procedures, this action alerts the Board of Supervisors that the report has been received and directs appropriate staff to review the report, provide the Board of Supervisors with an appropriate response, and forward that response to the Superior Court no later than August 9, 2017 (90 days). CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: No immediate consequence. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: No impact. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Timothy Ewell, (925) 335-1036 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stephanie Mello, Deputy cc: C. 84 To:Board of Supervisors From:David Twa, County Administrator Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:Civil Grand Jury Report No. 1702, "Emergency Mass Care and Shelter: Are We Ready" June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1418 ATTACHMENTS Civil Grand Jury Report No. 1702, "Emergency Mass Care and Shelter: Are We Ready?" June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1419 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1420 Contra Costa County 2016-2017 Grand Jury Report 1702 Page 1 Grand Jury Reports are posted at http://www.cc-courts.org/grandjury Contact: Jim Mellander Foreperson 925-608-2621 Contra Costa County Grand Jury Report 1702 Emergency Mass Care and Shelter Are We Ready? TO: Board of Supervisors, Office of the Sheriff SUMMARY The Contra Costa Office of the Sheriff, Office of Emergency Services (Sheriff OES), the Contra Costa County Employment and Human Services Department (EHSD), and the American Red Cross are responsible for establishing mass care and shelters in Contra Costa County following a disaster. These government agencies and the American Red Cross could be better prepared to reach that goal with more resources and a closer working relationship that includes improved communication and a coordinated shelter plan. Responsibility for coordinating such a shelter plan among EHSD, the American Red Cross and local jurisdictions, such as cities, special districts, and the County, rests with the Sheriff OES. The 2016 Bay Area Earthquake Plan created new requirements that the Sheriff OES and EHSD must incorporate into the County’s Mass Care and Shelter Plan. To meet the requirements of the 2016 Bay Area Earthquake Plan, EHSD needs access to view and update the National Shelter System (NSS). To incorporate these new requirements, the Sheriff OES also needs to develop a standard procedure for all local jurisdictions to establish mass care and shelter within its jurisdiction. METHODOLOGY The Grand Jury reviewed published documents from the United States Geological Survey, the California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services, the Sheriff OES, EHSD, the American Red Cross, and the United States Department of Homeland Security Bay Area Urban Area Security Initiative (UASI). The Grand Jury also interviewed representatives from the Sheriff OES, EHSD, the Bay Area UASI, and the American Red Cross. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1421 Contra Costa County 2016-2017 Grand Jury Report 1702 Page 2 Grand Jury Reports are posted at http://www.cc-courts.org/grandjury BACKGROUND Contra Costa County is highly vulnerable to earthquakes. The United States Geological Survey (USGS) predicts there is a 73 percent chance that a catastrophic earthquake of magnitude 6.7 or larger will occur in the San Francisco Bay Area within the next 30 years. There are three major faults in Contra Costa County: the Hayward Fault, the Calaveras Fault, and the Concord-Green Valley Fault. The San Andreas Fault, which is the largest fault in the Bay Area and could produce an earthquake up to magnitude 8.5, is also in close proximity to Contra Costa County. A major rupture along any of these four faults will cause catastrophic damage to communities in Contra Costa County. The 2013-2014 Grand Jury produced an investigation report, “County Emergency Operations, Ready or Not?” The Grand Jury found that Contra Costa County did not have an approved Emergency Operations Plan. It made three recommendations: 1. The Sheriff should update the Emergency Operations Plan. 2. The Board of Supervisors should approve the updated Emergency Operations Plan. 3. The County should plan for and construct a permanent Emergency Operations Center if funds become available. The Sheriff completed the first recommendation by updating the Emergency Operations Plan in early 2015. The Board of Supervisors completed the second recommendation when it approved the Contra Costa County Emergency Operations Plan in June 2015. The Board of Supervisors began addressing the third recommendation in August 2016 when it funded preliminary planning and design for a permanent Emergency Operations Center. The 2016-2017 Grand Jury undertook an investigation to see whether the County is prepared for a catastrophic earthquake disaster. The Grand Jury focused on one area of preparation, the County’s Emergency Mass Care and Shelter Plan. The Emergency Mass Care and Shelter Plan provides for the temporary shelter and feeding of victims of a major disaster. These plans take two or three days to activate and remain in operation until the disaster impacts are resolved, which can be from several months to several years. After the disaster that resulted from Hurricane Katrina in 2005, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) established disaster planning, preparedness, response and recovery requirements for all states, including a Mass Care and Shelter Plan. In California, the Governor’s Office of Emergency Services adopted and imposed the requirements for local jurisdictions, such as counties, cities and special districts. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1422 Contra Costa County 2016-2017 Grand Jury Report 1702 Page 3 Grand Jury Reports are posted at http://www.cc-courts.org/grandjury FEMA, the State of California, and Bay Area governments also conducted earthquake planning and preparedness initiatives. Since this time, there have been a series of planning efforts mandated and funded by varying sources. The result has been series of emergency operational plans that are inconsistent with each other, and failed to meet the requirements of the latest planning mandate. The following is a brief history of these planning efforts: 2005: FEMA establishes the National Response Framework and National Incident Management System. The National Response Framework is the standard framework for all states to follow in planning, preparing, responding, and recovering from a disaster. The National Incident Management System enables states to communicate and manage a disaster in a standardized manner. FEMA designates the health and human services departments of each respective state as the responsible agencies to ensure that Mass Care and Shelters Plans are operational. FEMA assigns the American Red Cross, a non-governmental agency, as the agency that is responsible for identifying and making prearrangements for the emergency shelters. Once local jurisdictions identify, inspect, and open shelters, the American Red Cross has the responsibility to operate them. 2008: FEMA and California publish the “California Catastrophic Incident Base Plan: Concept of Operations.” This plan provides greater detail in planning and preparation at the local jurisdiction level for a catastrophic earthquake. The Plan also establishes criteria for operational plans as part of the overall emergency operations plan. The Plan has since been superseded by the 2016 Bay Area Earthquake Plan. 2009: The California State Emergency Plan is adopted, which requires all counties to have an approved Emergency Operations Plan. As required by FEMA, the California State Emergency Plan designates the California Health and Human Services Department as the lead state agency to ensure that Mass Care and Shelter Plans are operational. 2010: The Sheriff OES publishes five earthquake operational plans, including the Catastrophic Mass Care and Shelter Plan, in response to the 2008 “California Catastrophic Incident Base Plan: Concept of Operations.” These operational plans supplement the County’s main Emergency Operations Plan. The operational plans are out of date but still in use. 2011: The County partners with other San Francisco Bay Area counties under the Bay Area Urban Area Security Initiative (UASI) as part of ongoing coordination and planning. A federal grant to Bay Area UASI provides funds that assist counties in preparing disaster response operational plans at the local level. These operational plans, including Mass Care and Shelter, are annexes (specific stand-alone operational plans) to the County Emergency Operations Plan. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1423 Contra Costa County 2016-2017 Grand Jury Report 1702 Page 4 Grand Jury Reports are posted at http://www.cc-courts.org/grandjury 2015: The County approves the Emergency Operations Plan. The 2015 Emergency Operations Plan designates EHSD as the lead County department responsible for ensuring that the Mass Care and Shelter Plan is operational. Under the Emergency Operations Plan, the Sheriff OES has overall responsibility for planning, preparing, responding and coordinating Contra Costa County’s disaster response and recovery efforts. 2016: The 2016 Bay Area Earthquake Plan prepared by the Department of Homeland Security, FEMA, and California Office of Emergency Services supersedes the 2008 “California Catastrophic Incident Base Plan: Concept of Operations” and the 2011 UASI planning. The 2016 Bay Area Earthquake Plan has new and updated requirements that the Sheriff OES will need to implement. To comply with these requirements, the Sheriff OES will need to update all existing annexes and specific detailed operational plans or replace them with new plans. DISCUSSION Scientists and all Bay Area government agencies agree that a 6.7 magnitude or larger earthquake will occur in the San Francisco Bay Area, causing a catastrophic disaster. Three major faults run through Contra Costa County and a fourth passes nearby. When a catastrophic earthquake occurs, many thousands of people will be homeless and in need of emergency shelter and care. The Mass Care and Shelter Plan establishes processes and procedures for sheltering and feeding those in need. Additionally, the 2016 Bay Area Earthquake Plan establishes new operational disaster response and recovery criteria based on worst-case scenarios. All Bay Area counties are required to comply with these criteria. Lead Agencies for Contra Costa County In Contra Costa County, the Sheriff OES is charged with planning and coordinating the County’s response to a disaster. It also shares responsibility with EHSD for preparing and updating the Mass Care and Shelter Plan. EHSD is responsible for executing the Mass Care and Shelter Plan and coordinating with the American Red Cross to operate the shelters. Although EHSD and the American Red Cross must coordinate their joint operations, they do not meet to discuss the logistics of the coordination. The evolving plans and requirements surrounding emergency responses have resulted in agencies creating inconsistent emergency plans. EHSD 2016 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1424 Contra Costa County 2016-2017 Grand Jury Report 1702 Page 5 Grand Jury Reports are posted at http://www.cc-courts.org/grandjury Emergency Management Plan differs significantly from the Sheriff OES 2010 Catastrophic Mass Care and Shelter Plan, and the 2016 Bay Area Earthquake Plan. The 2010 Sheriff OES Catastrophic Mass Care and Shelter Plan also does not comply with the 2016 Bay Area Earthquake format. Both EHSD and Sheriff OES also stated that a lack of resources in both agencies has led to minimal coordination between agencies regarding a Catastrophic Mass Care and Shelter plan. Role of the American Red Cross The lead nongovernmental agency is the American Red Cross, which is tasked with identifying and arranging for potential emergency shelter sites. The American Red Cross enters into non-binding memoranda of understanding with owners of buildings in Contra Costa County that could serve as emergency shelters. Each non-binding memorandum of understanding establishes the parameters of when a facility may be used as a shelter. Typical emergency shelters include schools, community centers, and armories. The Red Cross then lists these shelters on the National Shelter System (NSS), which is a FEMA database that contains that location and contact information for all potential American Red Cross shelters. All local jurisdictions are granted access to the NSS if they apply for that access. During emergencies, this access helps a local jurisdiction to identify nearby shelter locations. The local jurisdiction next screens possible locations by consulting with its safety inspectors to determine whether the shelter is safe to operate. If the local jurisdiction chooses the site, the Incident Commander or Unified Command under the National Incident Management System then tasks the American Red Cross to operate the shelter. The American Red Cross is not responsible for selecting a shelter site or for determining whether the shelter is safe to use after a disaster occurs. In Contra Costa County, the American Red Cross has three paid employees who routinely assist with emergencies. Due to limited staffing, the American Red Cross has not updated the NSS shelter list for Contra Costa County since 2008. While Sheriff OES can access and view data in the NSS, only the American Red Cross can modify the data. Sheriff OES does not know whether the list of sites is up to date or whether the listed shelters are operational. However, Sheriff OES and the American Red Cross do meet regularly so this could be a topic of discussion. Emergency Plans for a Catastrophic Earthquake in Contra Costa County When a catastrophic earthquake occurs, many dwellings, homes and apartment units, will be damaged or destroyed. There will be an urgent need to shelter and June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1425 Contra Costa County 2016-2017 Grand Jury Report 1702 Page 6 Grand Jury Reports are posted at http://www.cc-courts.org/grandjury feed displaced residents. For this reason, local agencies need to understand what resources the American Red Cross can provide to assist these residents. During an emergency, the American Red Cross, at the direction of the Incident Commander or Unified Command under the National Incident Management System, will operate those shelters on the NSS list that have been determined to be safe to occupy. As described above, the American Red Cross has non-binding memoranda of understanding with the owners of each potential shelter concerning the building’s use during an emergency In Contra Costa County, the American Red Cross trains EHSD staff on shelter operations. Emergency plans call for EHSD to send employees to assist with these operations. However, EHSD does not currently have access to the NSS. To operate smoothly, EHSD needs access to NSS shelter locations in Contra Costa County and needs to work with the American Red Cross to keep the list up-to-date; ensuring that shelters are available if the need arises. Additionally, to effectively open and manage mass care and shelters with the American Red Cross, the Sheriff and EHSD must coordinate their response. The Sheriff and EHSD do not have a standard procedure for identifying and establishing emergency shelters. To deliver a coordinated response, the Sheriff and EHSD must operate from the same plan. A standard written procedure is needed for the Sheriff and EHSD to follow in establishing shelters for the impacted population. FINDINGS F1. The Bay Area Earthquake Plan of July 6, 2016, establishes operational planning and preparation criteria for each Bay Area county. F2. The Sheriff OES is charged with planning and coordinating the County’s response to a disaster. F3. Sheriff OES Catastrophic Mass Care and Shelter Plan and other earthquake operational planning and preparation plans, dated 2010, do not meet the 2016 Bay Area Earthquake Plan requirements. F4. EHSD is responsible for executing the Mass Care and Shelter Plan and coordinating with the American Red Cross to operate emergency shelters. F5. EHSD 2016 Emergency Management Plan differs from the Sheriff OES 2010 Mass Care and Shelter Plan. F6. EHSD 2016 Emergency Management Plan does not meet the 2016 Bay Area Earthquake Plan requirements. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1426 Contra Costa County 2016-2017 Grand Jury Report 1702 Page 7 Grand Jury Reports are posted at http://www.cc-courts.org/grandjury F7. EHSD does not have the resources to continually work with the Sheriff OES to coordinate, plan and keep updated the Mass Care and Shelter Plan. F8. Sheriff OES does not have the resources to update all the operational planning and preparation plans as required by the 2016 Bay Area Earthquake Plan. F9. Sheriff OES has no written procedures concerning selection, inspection and opening an emergency shelter. F10. Sheriff OES has no standard training program that covers how emergency shelters are selected, inspected, and opened. F11. The Sheriff OES recognizes the American Red Cross makes non-binding pre- arrangements for shelters and lists the shelters on the FEMA sponsored database, National Shelter System (NSS). F12. Responsibility for determining whether a shelter is habitable and safe to use rests with the local jurisdiction or Sheriff OES. F13. Sheriff OES can view, but not edit, data in the NSS. F14. EHSD does not have access to the NSS. F15. Sheriff OES does not receive regularly scheduled reviews and updates of shelter sites in NSS from American Red Cross. F16. Sheriff OES has not received a NSS based shelter report from the American Red Cross since 2008. F17. EHSD does not receive regularly scheduled reviews and updates of shelter sites in NSS from ARC. F18. EHSD has not received a NSS based shelter report from the American Red Cross since 2008. RECOMMENDATIONS R1. Sheriff OES should consider creating a schedule for updating the Bay Area Earthquake Plan operational annexes by the end of 2017. R2. The Board of Supervisors should consider identifying funds by July 1, 2018, to permit Sheriff OES and EHSD to coordinate and complete the Mass Care and Shelter Plan according to the schedule submitted by the Sheriff OES. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1427 Contra Costa County 2016-2017 Grand Jury Report 1702 Page 8 Grand Jury Reports are posted at http://www.cc-courts.org/grandjury R3. Sheriff OES should consider developing a written Mass Care and Shelter protocol by July 1, 2018, that covers selection, inspection, and opening a shelter, and identifying funds to do so. R4. Sheriff OES should consider including shelter selection, inspection and preparation when it establishes the Emergency Operations Center for a simulated disaster as part of disaster exercises. R5. EHSD should consider access to view the NSS list by the end of 2017. R6. Sheriff OES should consider providing training to EHSD on how to use the NSS system after EHSD is granted access to view the NSS list, R7. EHSD should consider periodic reviews of the currency of the data and make update recommendations and corrections to the American Red Cross after EHSD is granted access to view the NSS list. R8. Sheriff OES and American Red Cross should consider inviting EHSD to their regular meetings regarding earthquake planning and review of associated policies. R9. Sheriff OES should consider reviewing its plans to coordinate local jurisdictions, EHSD and the American Red Cross during an emergency, and develop procedures and provide training where deficiencies are identified. REQUIRED RESPONSES Findings Recommendations Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors F1 to F3, F5, F8 to 13, F15, F16 R1, R3, R4, R6, R8, R9 The Office of the Sheriff F1, F4 to F7, F14, F17, F18 R2, R5, R7, R8, R9 These responses must be provided in the format and by the date set forth in the cover letter that accompanies this report. An electronic copy of these responses in the form of a Word document should be sent by e-mail to ctadmin@contracosta.courts.ca.gov and a hard (paper) copy should be sent to: Civil Grand Jury – Foreperson 725 Court Street P.O. Box 431 Martinez, CA 94553-0091 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1428 Contra Costa County 2016-2017 Grand Jury Report 1702 Page 9 Grand Jury Reports are posted at http://www.cc-courts.org/grandjury APPENDIX List of Organizations and Acronyms: • Contra Costa County Office of the Sheriff • Contra Costa County Office of the Sheriff, Office of Emergency Services (Sheriff OES) • Country Costa County Employment and Human Service Department (EHSD) • Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) • Department of Homeland Security • Department of Homeland Security Bay Area Urban Area Security Initiative (Bay Area UASI) • United State Geological Survey (USGS) • American Red Cross • Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors (Board of Supervisors) • National Shelter System (NSS) June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1429 RECOMMENDATION(S): RECEIVE Civil Grand Jury Report No. 1703, entitled "Mental Health Services for At-Risk Children in Contra Costa County" (attached), and FORWARD to the County Administrator for response. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: On May 11, 2017, the 2016/17 Civil Grand Jury filed the above referenced report. Per standard procedures, this action alerts the Board of Supervisors that the report has been received and directs the appropriate staff to review the report, provide the Board of Supervisors with an appropriate response, and forward that response to the Superior Court no later than August 9, 2017 (90 days). CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: No immediate consequence. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Enid Mendoza, (925) 335-1039 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stephanie Mello, Deputy cc: C. 85 To:Board of Supervisors From:David Twa, County Administrator Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:Civil Grand Jury Report No. 1703: Mental Health Services for At-Risk Children in Contra Costa County June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1430 ATTACHMENTS Grand Jury Report No. 1703 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1431 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1432 Contra Costa County 2016-2017 Grand Jury Report 1703 Page 1 Grand Jury Reports are posted at http://www.cc-courts.org/grandjury Contact: Jim Mellander Foreperson 925-608-2621 Contra Costa County Grand Jury Report 1703 Mental Health Services for At-Risk Children in Contra Costa County TO: County Board of Supervisors, Behavioral Health Services SUMMARY The Grand Jury conducted a detailed investigation concerning the County’s delivery of mental health services to at-risk children (“At-Risk Children”), which is defined as foster children or those in danger of becoming foster children, Commercial Sexually Exploited Children victims (CSEC), youth detained in Juvenile Hall, and children in domestic violence or sexual abuse situations. Over the course of a seven-month investigation, the Grand Jury found that at-risk children are not receiving timely access to mental health treatment. Several factors were preventing timely access, all of which are within the control of Behavioral Health Services and its subdivision Children’s Mental Health Services. The Board of Supervisors should consider identifying funds to provide timely treatment for children. METHODOLOGY The Grand Jury researched the statutes, agreements and regulations on mental health services for children that pertain to the County. It also researched official reports from State and County agencies, and conducted numerous interviews with County personnel who are involved in the delivery of mental health services. BACKGROUND This Grand Jury conducted a detailed investigation of mental health services for at-risk children in Contra Costa County. For purposes of this investigation, the Grand Jury defined at-risk children as: • Foster children or those in danger of becoming foster children • Commercial Sexual Exploitation of Children (CSEC) victims • Youth detained in Juvenile Hall • Children who have experienced domestic violence and sexual abuse. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1433 Contra Costa County 2016-2017 Grand Jury Report 1703 Page 2 Grand Jury Reports are posted at http://www.cc-courts.org/grandjury The Mental Health Commission White Paper The Mental Health Commission (MHC), an advisory body appointed by the Board of Supervisors to serve as the watchdog group in the County for mental health services, issued a white paper in April 2016 “to encourage discussion around the current crisis in the county public mental health care system and deficits in the county mental health budget process that contribute to this crisis.” While the white paper was issued by MHC, Behavioral Health Services (BHS) assisted MHC with the data and the contents of the paper. The paper describes key points that are pertinent to at-risk children: “The wake-up call of the crisis at Psychiatric Emergency Services (PES) that points to an impacted system that is unable to provide the right treatment at the right moment in time and is therefore struggling to truly meet the needs of people with a serious mental illness,” “The compromised ability of Child/Adolescent Clinics to meet the needs of patients due to understaffing as evidenced by three to four months wait times and a migration of patients to PES for intervention that is not meant to be a stand-in for treatment,” “The underlying theme of inadequate staffing levels due to the inability of treatment facilities to attract and keep high quality psychiatrists and nurses because of uncompetitive compensation and such practices as closing of lists,” “The underlying theme of dedicated, quality staff struggling to offer excellent care but undercut by budgets that are generated by a formulaic, top down process rather than a process that builds up a budget from program needs.” The Katie A. Requirements In delivering mental health services, the County must comply with the terms of the Katie A. requirements. Katie A. was the lead plaintiff in a multiple-plaintiff lawsuit filed against Los Angeles County and the State of California in 2002. The lawsuit alleged that significant gaps existed in mental health services provided to children in the foster care system. By the age of 14, Katie A. had been shuffled through 37 foster homes and had endured 19 confinements in psychiatric hospitals. Los Angeles County settled with the plaintiffs in 2003. The State of California agreed to the following Katie A. child definition and mental health service requirements in 2011: Children who are in or at risk of entering foster care will be identified as the “Katie A. subclass.” A child will be part of the subclass if wraparound or specialized services are being considered for the child, or the child has been hospitalized three times in the past 24 months for behavioral reasons or is currently hospitalized for a behavioral issue. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1434 Contra Costa County 2016-2017 Grand Jury Report 1703 Page 3 Grand Jury Reports are posted at http://www.cc-courts.org/grandjury Pursuant to this agreement, California counties must adhere to a protocol, called a “core practice model,” for screening and treating foster children. In accordance with this protocol, children may be eligible for the following services: • Intensive Care Coordination (ICC) • Intensive Home-Based Services (IHBS) • Therapeutic Foster Care in specially-trained foster homes. The County hired several coordinators and appointed a Katie A. specialist manager to handle the new protocol. DISCUSSION The Grand Jury used the new Katie A. requirements and the MHC white paper as starting points to investigate Contra Costa County’s delivery of mental health services to at-risk children. Youth confined in Juvenile Hall receive a consistent and well-regulated package of children’s mental health services from the County since these children are in a controlled confinement. Of the 110 youth currently at the Hall (some of whom are CSEC victims), 30% have been identified as having mental health problems. BHS has assigned three County clinicians and a program manager to work exclusively at the Hall to provide treatment, which involves medication and therapy. All three therapists are grant-funded, and the grants require regular data reports on the outcome of the treatments. CSEC victims and children in domestic violence and sexual abuse situations are sometimes discovered by police responding to a complaint. The police refer the children to the Victim Advocates in the District Attorney’s Office. After securing the child in a safe environment, the advocate arranges for the child to receive therapy so that the child can better assist in the legal prosecution of their abusers. BHS is not usually involved in this process. Rather, the Victim Advocate arranges for the victim to receive treatment from a private therapist or psychiatrist. This treatment is funded by the State Victim Compensation Fund and continues for the months or years that the victim needs to recover. Despite receiving mental-health treatment, some CSEC victims are reluctant to testify against their pimp abusers. An estimated 85-90% of foster children need some form of mental health services. Given this statistic, it is not surprising that a significant component of the estimated 7,000-plus children in the County who are serviced for mental health annually are foster children, estimated at over 1,700, or those who are in danger of becoming foster children. Only 300 of these children currently belong to the “Katie A. subclass.” The County’s compliance in the Katie A. requirements is a work in progress. Satisfactory June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1435 Contra Costa County 2016-2017 Grand Jury Report 1703 Page 4 Grand Jury Reports are posted at http://www.cc-courts.org/grandjury compliance depends upon skilled coordination between the social workers in Children and Family Services (CFS) and the clinicians at BHS. Children who may need mental health services are generally assessed and evaluated within 7-10 days. However, children wait much longer, weeks or months, to receive treatment. After assessment and evaluation, the social workers at CFS arrange for treatment for the child client through the BHS liaisons. The liaisons provide the social workers and child guardians with three referrals of available psychiatrists or therapists from their database. The social workers or guardians call these mental health professionals to schedule treatment. Oftentimes, the social workers or guardians find that the three referrals they have been given by the BHS liaisons are not available. Then they must go back to the liaisons to arrange for another set of three referrals. This is the cause of many delays. The CFS social workers state that the child has an average waiting time for treatment of three months and the BHS liaisons state that the average is only 4 to 6 weeks. These two sets of County workers are working from different perspectives and from different calendar counts. The BHS liaisons also state that they do not have an updated list of unavailable psychiatrists or therapists. After the screening and evaluation phase, each of the 7,000-plus children are classified into two groups: 1. Medium to severe 2. Mild to medium The mild to medium cases are scheduled for appointments with psychiatrists and therapists in non-profit community-based organizations (CBOs) and private therapists contracted by BHS. The medium to severe cases are scheduled for appointments with the psychiatrists and therapists in the County’s three regional mental health clinics. There are several factors that prevent children from accessing mental health services in a timely manner. These factors differ depending on whether the child is classified as medium to severe, or mild to medium. Medium to Severe Cases The three mental health clinics are understaffed in terms of psychiatrists, the doctors who diagnose the children and prescribe medication for them when appropriate. Children’s Mental Health Services estimates it needs to hire six more psychiatrists to handle the workload and resolve the inequitable distribution among the regional clinics. The County pays $30-50,000 less than what psychiatrists can earn in private practice. Table 1 shows the distribution of the medium to severe cases assigned to the three clinics and the corresponding distribution of psychiatrists in those three clinics. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1436 Contra Costa County 2016-2017 Grand Jury Report 1703 Page 5 Grand Jury Reports are posted at http://www.cc-courts.org/grandjury TABLE 1 Antioch Concord West County TOTAL Children 630 740 800 2170 Psychiatrists* 2.2 3.5 1.3 7 Ratio 286.4 211.4 615.4 310 Note: * Full time equivalent As shown on Table 2, the distribution of 85 County therapists across the three clinics is inequitable relative to the distribution of medium to severe mental cases. TABLE 2 Antioch Concord West County TOTAL Children 630 740 800 2170 Therapists 22 47 16 85 Ratio 28.6 15.7 50 25.5 The normal management response to such uneven distribution is to reallocate some therapists from Concord, to Antioch and to West County. The Grand Jury found no evidence that any such plan is being considered. Mild to Medium Cases BHS contracts with 34 non-profit Community Based Organizations (CBOs) to treat the estimated 5,000 children considered mild to medium cases. Twenty percent of these 34 CBOs were at capacity as of February 2017, meaning that seven of the CBOs had no appointment availability. The BHS liaisons, who provide the appointment referrals for the guardians/patients, do not have current data on the clinicians’ availability. Thus, social workers or guardians call to CBOs that have no availability, causing delays in the children’s treatment. In addition to providing mental health treatment through CBOs, BHS can assign the 5,000 children who are diagnosed as mild to medium cases to the over 200 individual private therapists that it contracts with. Like CBOs, these private therapists have limited availability. Table 3 shows the availability of those private therapists in February 2017 and their distribution in the three regions. TABLE 3 East County Central West County TOTAL Private Therapist 60 100 47 207 Available 13 33 21 67 Not available 47 (78%) 67 (67%) 26 (55%) 140 (68%) June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1437 Contra Costa County 2016-2017 Grand Jury Report 1703 Page 6 Grand Jury Reports are posted at http://www.cc-courts.org/grandjury Overall, 68% of the private therapists were not available for appointments. Thus, children must wait longer for mental health services. While no-shows for appointments also contribute to longer wait times, this factor is not under the control of BHS. The tables show what is within the control of BHS and its subdivision that manages treatment delays for at-risk children. FINDINGS F1. The County provides timely and consistent mental health services to detained youth in Juvenile Hall, CSEC victims, and children in domestic violence and sexual abuse situations. F2. Under the terms of the Katie A. requirements, upper and middle management levels of CFS and BHS have started to coordinate their efforts. F3. Many at-risk children are not receiving mental health treatment for several weeks to several months after the County assesses their mental-health needs. F4. Children’s Mental Health Services estimates that the County needs an additional six psychiatrists for its three clinics. F5. County salaries for psychiatrists are not competitive with private practice. F6. The shortage of psychiatrists causes delays in the diagnosis and treatment of medium to severe mentally ill children. F7. West County clinic, which has the most medium to severe patients, also has the highest patient to therapist ratio. F8. The 85 County therapists, who treat medium to severely mentally ill children, are not equitably distributed among the three clinics based on workload. F9. Twenty percent of the CBOs and 68% of the individual private therapists are not available for appointments. F10. BHS liaisons are not provided with current information about the availability of CBOs and private therapists for appointments. RECOMMENDATIONS R1. The Board of Supervisors should consider identifying funds to add six psychiatrists at the three regional mental health clinics. R2. The Board of Supervisors should consider directing Human Resources to review the compensation packages for County psychiatrists to ensure their compensation packages are competitive compared with the private market. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1438 Contra Costa County 2016-2017 Grand Jury Report 1703 Page 7 Grand Jury Reports are posted at http://www.cc-courts.org/grandjury R3. The Board of Supervisors should consider directing BHS to redeploy therapists with a view to a more equitable ratio of children per therapist among the County’s three mental health clinics. R4. The Board of Supervisors should consider identifying funds to enable BHS to review and improve systems related to the real time availability of CBOs and individual private therapists for mental health service appointments. R5. The Board of Supervisors should consider directing BHS to monitor and report on the wait times for mental health treatment for at-risk children. REQUIRED RESPONSES Findings Recommendations Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors F1 to F10 R1 to R5 These responses must be provided in the format and by the date set forth in the cover letter that accompanies this report. An electronic copy of these responses in the form of a Word document should be sent by e-mail to ctadmin@contracosta.courts.ca.gov and a hard (paper) copy should be sent to: Civil Grand Jury – Foreperson 725 Court Street P.O. Box 431 Martinez, CA 94553-0091 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1439 RECOMMENDATION(S): RECEIVE Civil Grand Jury Report No. 1704 "Selection of Ballot Measure Arguments" (attached), and FORWARD to the County Clerk-Recorder for response. FISCAL IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND: On May 30, 2017, the 2016/17 Civil Grand Jury filed the above referenced attached report. Per standard procedures, this action alerts the Board of Supervisors that the report has been received and directs appropriate staff to review the report, provide the Board of Supervisors with an appropriate response, and forward that response to the Superior Court within 90 days (August 29, 2017). Note that responses are required from the County Clerk-Recorder. Elected officials must respond to the recommendations within sixty (60) days. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: No immediate consequence. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/13/2017 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Lisa Driscoll, County Finance Director (925) 335-1023 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 13, 2017 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stephanie Mello, Deputy cc: Joseph E. Canciamilla, County Clerk-Recorder C. 86 To:Board of Supervisors From:David Twa, County Administrator Date:June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Subject:Civil Grand Jury Report No. 1704 "Selection of Ballot Measure Arguments" June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1440 ATTACHMENTS Grand Jury Report No. 1704 "Selection of Ballot Measure Arguments June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1441 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1442 Contra Costa County 2016-2017 Grand Jury Report 1704 Page 1 Grand Jury Reports are posted at http://www.cc-courts.org/grandjury Contact: Jim Mellander Foreperson 925-608-2621 Contra Costa County Grand Jury Report 1704 Selection of Ballot Measure Arguments TO: Contra Costa County Clerk-Recorder-Registrar SUMMARY The Contra Costa County Civil Grand Jury (Grand Jury) investigated the procedures used by the Elections Division of the Contra Costa County Clerk-Recorder-Registrar (Registrar) to select ballot measure arguments to include in the Voter Guide for the November 2016 election. This investigation focused on the legal requirements for selection of competing ballot arguments, the methods used by the Elections Division in making the selections, and how that information is communicated to the public. The Grand Jury found that the Registrar followed the legal guidelines in the selection of ballot arguments. However, the Grand Jury recommends that the Registrar consider producing detailed documentation of the ballot argument selection process. The Grand Jury also recommends that the Registrar consider developing procedures that indicate how authors of competing ballot arguments may collaborate regarding inclusion of a ballot argument in the Voter Guide. METHODOLOGY In the course of its investigation, the Grand Jury: • Reviewed and researched complaints filed with the Grand Jury in this matter • Interviewed the complaining parties • Interviewed officials of the Registrar’s office • Reviewed internal documents from the Registrar’s office • Reviewed California State Elections Code (Elections Code) Sections §9100- 9190, and other relevant Elections Code Sections • Reviewed public documents produced by the Registrar’s office, including the “Guide to Filing Arguments For County, Cities, School Districts and Special Districts - 2016” (Argument Guide), and the “Voter Guide and Sample Ballot” (Voter Guide) for the 2016 November General Election (Election) June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1443 Contra Costa County 2016-2017 Grand Jury Report 1704 Page 2 Grand Jury Reports are posted at http://www.cc-courts.org/grandjury • Checked for any court decisions interpreting Section §9166 of the Elections Code • Performed Internet research on topics relevant to the investigation • Consulted with the Grand Jury’s legal advisor BACKGROUND The election process provides citizens the opportunity to determine the direction of their government at the national, state, and local levels. Public confidence in the integrity, fairness, and impartiality of Elections Officials is critical to the election process. In Contra Costa County, the Registrar is the elected public official responsible for conducting all elections. The County Elections Division, under the direction of the Registrar, is tasked with performing all election functions. Voters select from candidates for public office and approve or reject ballot measures. In California Voter Guides are produced and supplied to the public by the appropriate authorities. The County Elections Division is responsible for producing the Voter Guide for local issues, and provides summaries and complete texts of each ballot issue. The Voter Guide also contains arguments for and against those ballot issues, along with rebuttal arguments. Under California law, The Registrar’s office selects ballot arguments for inclusion in the Voter Guide. The Grand Jury’s investigation focused on the processes, procedures, and information provided to the public used in this selection process. DISCUSSION Legal Matters The legal procedures for the filing of ballot measures and the submission of arguments for and against ballot measures are set forth in California Elections Code §9100-9190 for County measures, §9200-9295 for City measures, and §9500-9509 for School District measures. The ballot argument selection process for County measures is governed by §9166 of the California Elections Code. Very similar statutes govern the ballot argument selection process for City and School District measures (Elections Code §9287 & §9503). After inclusion of an initiative on the ballot, a period is established in which “For” and “Against” arguments may be submitted. Upon the close of that period, elections officials select one “For” and one “Against” argument for publication in the Voter Guide. In rare cases, if no ballot argument is submitted, it will be noted in the Voter Guide. The Elections Code establishes the selection priority to be used by elections officials when competing ballot arguments are submitted. Regarding county measures, Elections Code §9166 describes the order of priority: June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1444 Contra Costa County 2016-2017 Grand Jury Report 1704 Page 3 Grand Jury Reports are posted at http://www.cc-courts.org/grandjury If more than one argument for or more than one argument against any county measure is submitted to the county elections official within the time prescribed, the county elections official shall select one of the arguments in favor and one of the arguments against the measure for printing and distribution to the voters. In selecting the argument the county elections official shall give preference and priority in the order named to the arguments of the following: a) The board of supervisors or a member or members of the board. b) The individual voter, or bona fide association of citizens, or combination of voters and associations, who are the bona fide sponsors or proponents of the measure. c) Bona fide associations of citizens. d) Individual voters who are eligible to vote on the measure. City Measures governed by Elections Code §9287 substitute “The legislative body, or member or members of the legislative body authorized by that body” for priority (a) above. School District Measures governed by Elections Code §9503 similarly substitute “The governing board of the district or a member or members of the board.” Otherwise, the order of priority is the same. When considering County Measures, arguments submitted by the Board of Supervisors have priority over arguments submitted by private citizens or by associations of citizens. The Grand Jury was interested in the case of multiple ballot arguments of the same priority being submitted for a particular measure, and the process for selecting between those competing arguments for inclusion in the Voter Guide. The Elections Code is silent as to how elections officials should select between multiple ballot arguments of the same priority. The Elections Code is also silent as to the meaning of “bona fide.” However, Black’s Law Dictionary, a legal reference, defines “bona fide” in part as “In or with good faith; honestly, openly, and sincerely; without deceit or fraud. Truly; actually; without simulation or pretense. Innocently; in the attitude of trust and confidence; without notice of fraud, etc.” California Evidence Code §664 presumes that officials exercise their duty properly, and the inclusion of the term “bona fide” in the Election Code suggests an implied duty to include verification of the “bona fide” status of an “association of citizens.” How that duty is to be exercised is not specified in the Elections Code, and thus is left to the discretion of election officials. Documentation of Selection Process The Elections Division has no written procedures to govern the process for selection of the argument to be published in the Voter Guide when multiple ballot arguments of the same priority have been submitted. When competing arguments are submitted, the Elections Division currently evaluates those arguments and selects the one considered to be the most effective. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1445 Contra Costa County 2016-2017 Grand Jury Report 1704 Page 4 Grand Jury Reports are posted at http://www.cc-courts.org/grandjury The Elections Division published the Argument Guide (http://www.cocovote.us/wp- content/uploads/2016_Guide-to-Filing-Arguments-and-Rebuttals1.pdf), prior to the November 2016 election, that provides information on ballot argument submission procedures and timing. The Grand Jury examined this document, specifically the information regarding the ballot argument selection process. This document does not describe the specific methodology by which County Elections Officials shall select between ballot arguments of the same priority. Selection Process in Various California Jurisdictions Elections Code §9166 states that Election Officials “shall select” one argument “For” and one “Against” each initiative, but is silent on the selection process when ballot arguments are of the same priority, and depends on Election Officials’ discretion. The Grand Jury reviewed published procedures for selecting between multiple ballot arguments of the same priority from various jurisdictions in California. Several jurisdictions provide detailed information on the processes used to select a ballot argument when multiple ballot arguments of the same priority are submitted as summarized below: 1. Mechanical procedures a. Random drawing of lots – generally performed in public, or among interested parties b. Date of submission – earliest date has preference 2. Objective additional selection criteria (used for selection between associations) a. The length of time the association has been in existence b. Whether an association’s membership consists primarily of citizens residing in the jurisdiction c. The number of members enrolled in the association d. Whether an officer of more than one bona fide association and/or one or more citizens of the jurisdiction have signed the argument 3. Collaboration a. Elections Officials ask multiple argument writers to mutually agree as to which argument should be included 4. Subjective criteria a. Judgment of Elections Officials 5. Various combinations of the above June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1446 Contra Costa County 2016-2017 Grand Jury Report 1704 Page 5 Grand Jury Reports are posted at http://www.cc-courts.org/grandjury County Elections Division Current Practices The Registrar employs the following practices in ballot argument selection: • Groups or individuals qualified by the Elections Code are allowed to submit ballot arguments. • The selection priority of multiple ballot argument submissions is governed by the Elections Code. • When arguments of the same priority are submitted, Elections Officials select which argument to include in the Voter Guide by exercising their judgment, based on their assessment of the strength of the argument. • The Elections Division requires documentation to qualify associations as bona fide. • The Elections Division has no documented procedure to verify the bona fide status of an association of citizens. • The individuals signing an argument on behalf of a bona fide association are not required to be registered voters in the jurisdiction. • Parties are encouraged to collaborate when multiple arguments are submitted. • There are currently no written procedures to facilitate such collaboration. FINDINGS F1. The procedures used by the Registrar and the Elections Division in ballot argument selection conform to the requirements of the Elections Code. F2. The Elections Division does not have written procedures governing the selection of multiple ballot arguments of the same priority. F3. The selection process between multiple ballot arguments of the same priority is based upon a subjective evaluation by Elections Officials. F4. The section in the Argument Guide that addresses the filing of multiple arguments of the same priority does not clearly set out the process by which the Registrar and the Elections Division exercise their discretion to select the argument to include in the Voter Guide. F5. Although the Argument Guide contains language encouraging parties to collaborate in the filing of arguments, it has no procedure indicating how parties filing arguments may collaborate. F6. The Argument Guide includes no procedure by which an association of citizens may establish its bona fide status. June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1447 Contra Costa County 2016-2017 Grand Jury Report 1704 Page 6 Grand Jury Reports are posted at http://www.cc-courts.org/grandjury RECOMMENDATIONS R1. Prior to the next election, the Registrar should consider developing internal procedures to clarify the process for selecting between multiple ballot arguments of the same priority. R2. In the next and subsequent revisions of the Argument Guide, the Registrar should consider including procedures that clarify the process for selecting between multiple ballot arguments of the same priority. R3. Prior to the next election, the Registrar should consider developing internal procedures to facilitate collaboration between parties that file competing ballot arguments. R4. In the next and subsequent revisions of the Argument Guide, the Registrar should consider including procedures to facilitate collaboration between parties that file competing ballot arguments. R5. Prior to the next election, the Registrar should consider developing internal procedures by which an association of citizens can establish its bona fide status. R6. In the next and subsequent revisions of the Argument Guide, the Registrar should consider including procedures by which an association of citizens can establish its bona fide status. REQUIRED RESPONSES Findings Recommendations Contra Costa County Clerk-Recorder-Registrar F1 to F6 R1 to R6 These responses must be provided in the format and by the date set forth in the cover letter that accompanies this report. An electronic copy of these responses in the form of a Word document should be sent by e-mail to ctadmin@contracosta.courts.ca.gov and a hard (paper) copy should be sent to: Civil Grand Jury – Foreperson 725 Court Street P.O. Box 431 Martinez, CA 94553-0091 June 13, 2017 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1448