Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESOLUTIONS - 09022004 - 70-844 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Changes ) of the Assessment Roll ) RESOLUTIONNO. 70/844 of Contra Costa County WHEREAS, the County Assessor having filed with this Board requests for correction of erroneous assessments, said requests having been consented to by the Brtrrlear ; County Counse NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County Auditor is authorized to correct the following assessments: For the Fiscal Year 1907a 19k7l It has been ascertained from the assessment roll and from papers in the Assessorf s office what was intended and ghat should have been assessed; and, therefore, pursuant to Section ).831 of the Revenue and >Taxation Cade, the fallowing defects in description and/ or form and clerical errors of the assessor on the roll should be corrected to remove or allow exemption as shown below* In Code Area 1.404, Pei 066-221-002, Sanford J. St orme s was erroneously not allowed' a veterannts exemption due to clerical error in not being sent to data. processing. Therefore, exemption 3n the amount' 'of $1000 should be allowed. In Cade ,Area 1000, Pel 066-221-437, Elly Jensen was errone- ously not allowed a veterants exemption due to clerical error in not berg sent to data processing. Therefore, exemption in the amount ' of $1300 should be allowed. In Code ,area 1000, Pel 067-080-020, David Madrigal was erroneously allowed the veterans exemption due to clerical error in calculating the value of his, assets, Veteran's exemption of $1000 should be removed. R_. O. _ OX, Ass stentrAssessor copy to: Assessor - Kris Auditor Tai. collector' Page 1 of 5 RESOLUTION NO. 70/844 __ In Code :area 1004, Pal 067. 09 -014. AAudrew L. Ruequoy was erroneou,slnot allowed a veteran-es oxention 'due to gleriPa-1 error in not being sunt to data prooevalt.w. Therefore$ exa!*tion in the smu=t of $1000 should be allose d. In Code ,area 10,00,# Pel €68'"', j1-fd2 Bill G. Smith, was erroneouslyallowed the vaterants exe stio+n of l00 instead of the homeowneres due to clerical .error in pre0eee1 - his claim. The> veterants--exemp cin was requesteEd an Fol X366- 1- 45,* 2here- forep veteranes exemEptioh of $10W should' be removed from PA-11 o66-o,5i-o;2q and ho .mown r#s exemption of 750 should bo alloyed. Veteran's exemption of $4550 should be allowed on P l t 68,isro1445. In Code Area 1000, Pel 071-043-006I Re `ugio Heredia was erroneously allowed the veteran's exempt on. due to clerical error in. 'calculating the value of his asseta. Yeterants exemption of $1000 shuld be removed, In. Code area 1001, Fol 074-12411-00401, Ronald S. chandler was erroneously allowed veteran's exemption dual to celerical error in oalculatfng the 'vale of his assets,, Veterant s exemption of $1000 should be removed and homeowner's exemption of $750 should be allowed. 3x3. Code ,area 20020 P of 11140218-00b. Roy *.. MWigini was erroneously allowed +eteran#: exomption due to clsrical error in calculating the 'value of his assets, Veteran's exemption. or $1000 , should, be removed, In. G4de area 2008Pct. 132-:#. -0010-, John . green wa8 erroneously,' allowed vetesranr s exempt on dde to cler1Qal error in calculating the value of his assets* I Vistelrant s e amptiqu of $1000 should be removed and homeowner,:sexemption cif ?.,O should be allowed. In Code ,area. 2011, fol 12€0-13Z-008 John P. Cashmore was erroneousl� ;allowed veteran's exemptiondue ,,t clerical error. in ea,loulating the 'value of his assets* Ve,teran s exemption of 1000 should be removed and homeownerla exemption of $750 should be allowed'. In Code .Area .5441, Pci 370_072 41€3, John C. Hillenbrand was erroneously allowed the veteran sa axeption due to de ri cal error :in: calculating; the value of his as+ssets Veteran'r a exemption of '$1000 should be removed. In bode krea $ 324 Pei 4�-�3�.-E�C3o H i .11ian Horn was erroneously allowed the Veteran's exemption die to clerical error in calculating the value of hissat * Veteran s ax st .on o $1000 should be removed and h *meowner�s exemption of 1510 should be >allowed, In bode area $ 321}, Pct. ,1 2-Q29s Erwin D Newton was erronaouslv. allowed the vat era �e exe apt .on due to clerical a ►rar in oaf. .ating the value of hips Ass0t . etera�e s ego tion of $1c3Qs antic be 're�moed snd hcseowner:s +aax€ption ofa ehc�uld be allowed* ' 74 0. u ,assistant. Assestsic�r s `... Page 2 of In Cede Area: 8087, Pel: 527 112-006, Cld miro . Garei.a waserroneously allowed veterans s axamption of $870 due to poet�.ng; error instead. of 1000. Therefore, veteran►s exeAption. of 4870' should be removed. and veteran s exemptian oaf 1CC should be allowed* Code ,area 11.CC�, Tel ��.3-t 62-0104* Lloyd �. �� was erroneously jallowed the VreteranI s exemption due to cZer3.Qa1 error in ealculating the va1us of his assetVatearsnr s examti U 4f $1000 should be removed and homeowners s exenption of 750 should be allowed. In Code area 11.0040 Pol 413-j 52w-0, 181 :,j. Willie H. Terry was erroneously Allowed the votaranl s exemption due tea' +clerical error in calculating the value 'of his assets# Veterans s' 614b-,tion of $10003 should be removed and. homeowner to exemption. of $750 should be allowed.# 2n Codes re a ,2 31$x Pel 14:9-2,02-036, Elbe L. Kramer was erroneously allowed they veterant s exempti.oh due to cler3eal error in ealou3ati the valtae ' of his,. aeseta 'veterans s exemption of *1000 Should. be 'removed and homeownerf s exemption of $7510 should be allowed. In. Code Area 120360Psl if b- -4 03 , Buse & Nam Chaeon were errouaously a11owad they veter"t sX-0 tion d to elerie<al error 3.n calculating the Valua a th r assets, veterants a ce p tion of : ,£ C?s should be removed and home, eemptcn of 7Q Should be a,�lowerd. In Code Area 120357: 1'c1 1�(3-1Q }., Paul u a fir. was erroneously allured. thea Vater t exaMti.on Au s to aleri+ al error in cal.ceulatng the value of hi.s _ aseets. eersnYs exepticrn 100 3 should be (removed and ho�owner�s exe�mpt3.oxz 'cif $750 should be 'allowed' In Code ,area 1 09:# , pol 232-051-008$* Ronald i+°. lxew s was erroneously; allowed the veterans s exptioxa due to clerical error In caleulat .ng they value� o his assets► �'gte taxa s exemption v 14£3 ? should bei remdved �comeowner's exemption of 75C should be :allowed. In Code mea I60002, Pot £3 3_110-00 .1 .A .e x J. e1 .ab; was 11 erroneously` allowed :the va orm a e�emption due to ol.arical error in eale;ul.atink the value of his as at:s. �eterants oxamption QP lGiCQ ►s1€aoul.d be remoVed. and homeowner's eaeranpti.on of. : 750 should be allowed. In Cocke Area 62031, Pcl 357: 2261-011p ; ens, Vsldivi.e was erroneously allowed the 'veteran's exomptlon due to cleri.ea►1 errexr in calculating the value of hi.e assets. etere3ra�s eemptian o $1000 should 11 be removed n.dI h:0M1gownerIs e amption of 75:01 should be allowed,► Assistant assessor 70/844 Page 3 of 5 In Code ,,area 66041, Pal 195-071-034 Delbert< F. ,awson was erroneously allow Ied the veteranfs exemption due to cler cal error in calculating the value of his assets. Ve'teran's exemption of $1000 should 'be removed. In Code ;area 66097, Pct. 212» l"*02.5: Richard: fid* Miller was erroneously allowed the veteran's s 'sxonTtion due to icler cal error in o 3.cul.a.the value of his,:::assetVetoran I s exemption 01f $1000 should be removed and homeowner�z exemption of 750 should be allowed. In Code Area 79031, Pel 097-071-�€�20Ja k M. Atamaau re- quested his v teran's; exemption on property owned in Calaveras County and his home€�wtner'a exsmpt an cin his prapert „ni ourcourt . Due to cl�srica�. error In-processing his elaim the vateranIs' exemp- t3 ori of 1000 should be removed and homeowner t s exemption of 750 should be allowed. In Cade Area 79038, Peel 113-31,5-006,, Jesse R* Nem. Jr. is not entered with veteran's exemption 4ue to cler�ieal error .in the assessed value of his property. In calculating the values of hisassets, he now qualifisa., therefore X0010 exemption should be allowed,.' In Code Area 83:0040, Pei. 268»063»003,2 Oreo a Welsorn erroneously not Allowed hie veteran s s exemption due to olar'loal error in not beim sent ..to data prooesei «. are:ore,, veterans s exemption of j 1000 should be be allowed and 75C.ho tiwner's exemp- tion. should be removed. In. Code ,area 85028, Pol 403.4-52-WO08, ohn M. Bad was erroneously allowed the vetergxnIs e. amption doe to clerical error in daloulatir assetVetmtion of $1000 should: be removed and homodwner's exemption of *750 should be allowed. In Code area. 85029, Pol 40 -Ill-Qty}:, Frank L. GW podonioo was erroneousl _allowed the veteran's exex -tion of $l0Q and the homeowner s exempt Lon cxf 7 C' due 'to ler gal error. in 'sub��tt�,�g infQrma,t on to data prop.assing. refors, the homeowner's' e .mp- tion of *754 should be removed and veteran.' exemption of,$1000 should be allowed. In Code ,area 1000"1k, Pct; 07}�--173--04'x, Alex G ar�hhcsus e was arroae ously allowed the votefrants exemption due to eleridal error in calculating the value 'afhis _assate. Therefore,, veteran's examp- tion of 1000 should be .removed. However, in accordaznde with Section 255,2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, a homeowner's exemption was filed, therefore homeowners a exemption of 7.�4', should be allowed:* R. C, SEATON Assistant. Assessor Page of 70/844 n code fires . , Pel 380 11 20.056, �.e�� �. Iry �cQ was arroneous.1 allowed the Vote�ax:�� axsm,Ptian due t� Olsrieal -11 ,error In ealeu3atn� a vel a assets, therecsre� �eteaxs resvsdH a h �ezc axe tion cul _0 € nd T na00'a � �w �� s with eeti 255;2 ah 'Revenue exemption was ft'16d, tharsfores homeowner's exemption of $15© should be allowed. Ass ste t .Assessor I hereby consent to., the eorreat v .d ehango# in the sbve resolut .cz � JORN Bt , c t Counsel b� . �t Page 5 of 5