HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESOLUTIONS - 09022004 - 70-820 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of Changes }
of the Assessment Rall } RESOLUTION NO. 7€/820
of Contra Costa County }
}
WHEREAS, the County Assessor having filed with this Board requests
for correction of erroneous assessments, said requests having been consented
to by the L?i-"rA4y
County Counsel ,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County Auditor is
authorized to correct the following assessments:
For the Fiscal Year 196-70- 196,71
It has been ascertained from the assessment roll and from
papers in the As'sessorts office what was intended and what should
have been assessed-, and, therefore, pursuant to Section 4631 of the
Revenue and Taxation Code, the following defects in-description and/
or form and clerical errors of the assessor on the roll should be
corrected to remove or allow exemption as shown belowl
In Code Area 5001, Fol 374-044-006, Carl 'Westberg Sr. was
erroneously allowed the homeownerts exemption. Information has
been received Whereas he is receiving OAS and is not eligible for
the homeowner t s exemption:, therefore, exemption in the amount of
$750 should be removed.
In Code Area 11403, Pel 412-►270--021., John E'. & Verda L.
Battenfeld was erroneously allowed the homeowner's exemption-on
his rental property and should have been allowed the exemption on
his principal place of residence per his request on Pcl 412-270-015.
Therefore, the homeowner's exemption. of $754 should be removed from:
Fel .12-274-021 and allowed $750 exemption on Fel 4-12-270-015-
In Code Area 11017, >Pel 4-10x-234-430, Tressie 0. Mattox was
erroneously allowed the homeownerts exemption. Information has
been received whereas she is receiving OAS and is not eligible
for the homeowner's exemption, therefore, exemption in the amount
of : 754 should be. removed..
R. 4. S A ON Assistant Assessor
copy to.* Assessor - Kris
Auditor'
Tax Collector
Page 1 of 2
RESOLUTION NCS. 70/820
In Code Area 12 83!, Pcl W-061-021!, Robert H*: & Lois N.
Qlderhage were denied their vateran s oxenstip auc throes', an
oversight were not mailed a homeownertionTherefore,
in aecordanee with 'fie pr visions of Se tilos% 21 ,11 , � of the Revenus
and Taxation Code, homeowner f s exemption. of $750 should he allowed.
In Code Area, 820,39, P�1 033-051-�3�.1, forge & Lillie
€eatherby was: errone us lir allow$d thea ho* awnort a Szem tion
Information has bee�n 'r volved Utero." ;they; ares reesiv ATD
and are not eligible for th.e ham eOwn err OX ti+ n therefore,
exeuption in the amount of $ ` ahould he removed.
In Cade ,Area 980a2, Pal l8T--0l 1.W022, Lydia '1a&nbarth.
fil d the horseowner►s a east xtien fin a t�.me1� ma .erg however,
throuZh elerl al error was not sent to data prooessl.T go
fore, the ho m rowher u s exom,tion, of 150 should be allowed.
in 0o;de Area 96003, Pei 1844 .50-006, Mildred G. Thumas was
erroneously e3.loved the h:ameca r s �sxemptiex .' Thrc�u e�.erlo .
error the exemption Vitas allowed. -As the property is being rented,
the examption, of 750 should be removed*
U-1,SSATO
I hereby oonsent to the
eorr io ctions and ch ges in
the above resolhtioa.
JOHN B. �� ounty C, 61
✓`" Y�4
Pu y
iCAd'C✓p.•H ed"
'day 0
Page 2 of 2
e'
710 `QV'1