Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESOLUTIONS - 09142004 - 71-101 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Changes } of the Assessment Roll. ) RESOLUTION NO. 71/101.. of Contra Costa County } } WHEREAS, the County Assessor having filed with this Board requests for correction of erroneous 'assessments, said requests having been consented to by the County Counsel # NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County Auditor is authorized to correct the following assessments: For the Fiscal YearjQfrracXy,*,0< 1970-71 It has been ascertained from the assessment roll and from papers in the assessor's office what :was intended and 'what should have been assessed; and, therefore, pursuant to Revenue and Taxa- tion Cade 4831,; the fallowing defects in description and/car form and clerical errors of the assessor on the roll should be 'cor- rected: Cade 09000 - Assessment c. 3052, William D. lshom is assessed for personal property with assessed valuation of $5,600 plus 10% penalty in the amount of $560 for failure to file within the time required by law pursuant to Section 463 of the Revenue and Taxation Code. There has been an error of the assessor in the spelling of the asssssee's name; therefore, the name should be corrected to read; William D. Isom, with values remaining the same. . . Seaton, Assistant AssessiW oc: Assessor (G. Giese) Page I of 3 Auditor ---- Tax Collector RESOLUTION b. 71 '101 FURTHER, for the 1969-70 fiscal year: It has been aseartained by the assessor from an audit of the assesseer s books of 'account car other papers that there has been a defeat of description or oleriaal error of the a.sseessee in, his property statement or In other infor ation or recordsfurnished to the sssesso wh oh eaused. the assessor to assess personal ;property, which should not have been assessed or to assess ,t ata substan- tially higher valuation than he would have entered on the 'roll if the inf 0mation had been oorreetly furnished.; and therefore, pur- suant to the revenue and Taxation Cade, Section 4831.5, the assessor certifies to the auditor that the following oorreeti.ons should be rade on the assessment ro11 ✓ Code 08001 _ Assessment Nd, : Sperry nand Corporation is assessed for pesrs€�na� Pro arty, with assessed valuation. of X13.,ZO' An sud3 t disclosed that assesseo overreported leased' equipment on his business property statement;; therefore* this assessment 'should be oorreeted to show personal property $1760* resulting in a reduction of 1,660. FURTHM for; the 1967-68 fiscal year: Code 08002 - Assessment No. 203 , ',iouils Pi.ziali is assessed' for personal property with assessed va.luxation of 18,140 and Improvements of $440. audit disclosed that asses$ee OV reported equiPment on his bus.iness,. property stateMent. therefore, this assessment should be 0Orrested to s�owr perso�ai. Prop $17..710, and improve*ents $440, resulting in !a re&wtlon of 1 30. Seaton., Ass scant Assessor X01 ?age of PURMR, for the 1966-67 fiscal year: Code 12039 - assessment No, 2005', Bond Stores .Hayward, Inc. #16 , is assessed for personal property with assessed valuation of i4l,640. an audit disclosed that assesses overreported inventory on his business property statement; therefore, this assessment should be corrected to show personal property $4(3,E3 0p resulting in a reduction of $1,600. I hereby consent to the correc- tions and changes in the above resolutions. JOHN B. CLAUSEN, County Counsel 40 By eTon, : 'ss s an asessor deputy Adopted by the Board this< day of