HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESOLUTIONS - 09132004 - 71-619 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of Changes )
of the Assessment Roll. ) RESOLUTION No. 71/619
of Contra Costa County )
}
WHEREAS, the County Assessor having filed with this Board requests
for correction of erroneous assessments, said requests having been consented
to by the Di-s#-r}et-Atto-*neyCounty counsel,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County Auditor is
authorized to correct the following assessments:
For the Fiscal Year 19671- 19j(22
It has been ascertained. from the assessment roll and from
papers in the Assessorts Office what was intended and ghat should
have been assessed; and, therefore, pursuant to Section 4831 of the
Revenue and. Taxation Code, the following defects in the describtion
anal/or form and. clerical. errors of the assessor on, the roll. should.
be corrected as shown below.
In Tax Rate' Area 1002, Fel. No. 076-131. 007-7, Ronald L.
Flanary was denied his veteran's tax exemption as his assets
exceeded the limitation. z-lowever, a clerical error was made in
quoting to this office the market value rather than assessed value
of his property located in .A ador County. In recalculating the
value of his assets, he now qualifies; therefore, fl-+e 'veteran=s
exemption of $1,000 should be allowed and the homeowner's exemption
of $�50 shou,ld be removed.
In Tax state Area 8001, Pel. No. .508-401-008-0, Elias
Jojol.a, Jr., was not granted a veterans exemption as ,additional
information was necessary to determine his eligibility, Necessary
information has been provided; therefore, the veteranf s exemption
of $1,000 should be allowed and the homeowner's exemption of x;750
should be rer:oved.
R. 0. SEATON
Assistant Assessor
Cody tc: Assessor (Kris)'
Auditor Page 1 of 2
`i`'ax Collector
RESOLUTION NO. 71/619
-,.....................................................................................................
. . . .. . .......
In -max Rate Area 8001, Fel. No. 529-150-011-3, Donald F.
Sellars was not granted a veteran's exemption as additional infor-
mation was needed from Napa County before eligibility could be
determined. This information has been provided; therefore, the
veteran's exemption of $1,000 should be allowed and the homeowner's
exemption of *750 should be removed.
In Tax Rate Area 8024, Pel. No- 414-122-002-2, Haybert K.
Houston was not granted a veterants exemption as additional infor-
mation was needed from Alameda County before his eligibility could
be determined. This information has been provided; therefore, the
veteran's exemption of t1,000 should be allowed.
In Tax Rate Area 11006, Pcl- No. LL13-033-018-8, Charles A.
Nicholas was not granted a veteran' s exemption as additional infor-
mation was necessary in determining eligibility. This information
has been provided; therefore, the veteran's exemption of $1,000
should be allowed and the homeowner' s exemption of 19750 should be
removed.
In Tax Rate Area 14002, Pel. No. 233-150-019-5,, Richard B.
Hunter was not granted a veterants exemption due to a clerical
error in not submitting the information to data processing. There-
fore, the veterants exemption of $1,000 should be allowed.
In Tax Rate Area 82039, Fel. No. 033-041-0-019-3, Donald W.
Jones was not granted a veterants exemption as additional information
was -necessary pertaining to a divorce action. This information has
been provided; therefore, the veteran's exemption of 51,000 should
be allowed and the homeowner's exemption of $750 should be removed.
In Tax Rate Area 96003 nos Asmuth was
Pcl. 174-070-006-1 A
denied the veteran's exemption due to a clerical error in calculating
his assets. The necessary information has been provided; therefore,
a veteran's exemption in the amount of ',,43810 should- be allowed..
I -hereby consent to the above
changes and/or corrections
R. 0. 9'5A.TOW
Assistant Assessor JOHN B. CLAUSES, County Counsel
Copy to: Assessor (Kris)
Auditor BY:
Tax Collector
-7/
Adopted by thlo `;pard this .2_114qX-' day of 19
Pae ge 2 of —2
..........