The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutRESOLUTIONS - 09102004 - 71-517 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Changes } of the Assessment Roll ) RESOLUTION NO. 71/517 of Contra. Costa County } } WHEREAS, the County Assessor hawing filed with this Board requests for correction of erroneous assessments, said requests having been consented to by the County Counsel; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County Auditor is authorized to correct the following assessments: For the Fiscal Year I, . 1 1971-72 It has been ascertained from the assessment roll and from papers in the assessor:s office what was intended and what should have been assessed; ;and, therefore, pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code 4$31, the following defects in description and/or fora and clerical errors of the assessor on the roll should be corrected.;_ and, pursuant to Section' 4985, the assessor requests the Board' of Supervisors to order the auditor to cancel any uncollected delin- quent penalty, cost, redemption penalty, interest, or redemption fee which has attached heretofore or hereafter because' of such error and because of assessor's inability to complete valid procedures initiated prior to the delinquency date: Code 60007 - Assessment No. 2010, James R Stornetta is assessed for personal property with assessed valuation of $1.1,240, leas business inventory exemption of $3,000, plus 1 penalty in the amount of 024 for failure to file within the time required by law per Section 463 of Revenue and Taxation Code. Upon receipt of additional information the original estimated assessment was found to be erroneous; therefore, should be corrected to show personal property $5,3400 less business inventory exemption $1,230, plus penalty in the amount of $824. A R. . ea on, . igls anAssessor cc: Assessor (G. Giese) Page 1, of Audi t or _.._ Tax Collector RESOLUTION Nd 71/517 _ __ Code 11003 - Assessment No. 2192, G. D. Schlemmer, dba Photo-Scan is erroneously assessed for personal property with assessed valuation of $1,470_ plus10y* penalty lin the amount of $147 for failure to file ,within the time required by law per section 463 of the Revenue and Taxation Cade. There has been an error of the assessor in trending up reported costs; there- fore this assessment' should be corrected to show personal property $1,010 ;plus' penalty" of $147. Litton Business Systems, Inc. , Monroe Division,, is erroneously assessed' for leased equipment' since there has been an 'a.ssessor►s error in trending up reported costs, therefore the following corrections should be made on the assessment roll, For the Original Corrected Amount Fiscal assessed: ,Assessed of Year Code Asaxpt. Class of PropertZ Value Value Chan„g„e 1971-72 01000-2335 Personal Property $680 $360 $320 1971-72 02002-2600 It 110 50' 60 1971-72 02008-2164 280 190 90 1971-72 08001-286 n 90 500 AO ' 1971-72 08001-2866 t : 590 310 1971-72' 08001-2867 " � 260 150 110' 1.971-72 09000-2570 �► " 330 170 160 1971-72 09000.2571 #r a: 330; 160 170 1971-72 09000-2572, s 3 210 110` 100 1971-72 11017-2133 540 280 ' 260 1971-72' 12012. 2054 �: �� 340 180 160 1971-72 98002-2012 : 140 70 70 It has been ascertained by the assessor from an audit of the ass'esse'e f s books of account or other papers that there has been a defect of description or clerical error of the assessee in his property statement or in other information or records furnished to the assessor which caused the assessor to assess personal property which should not have been assessed or to assess it at a substan- tially higher valuation than 'he would' have entered on the roll if the information had been correctly furnished; and, therefore, pur- suant to the Revenue` and Taxation Code,, Section 4831,.5, the assessor certifies to the auditor that the following corrections should be made on the assessment roll; and, furthers in accordance with Section. 4985 of the Revenue '& Taxation Code, any uncollected delinquent penalty, costs redemption penalty, ;,interest', or redemp- tion fee, heretofore or hereafter attached due to such error, should: be 'cancelled if it is impossible to complete valid procedures ini- tiated prior to delinquency date, upon, the showing that payment of the corrected or additional amount was made within 30 days from the date correction is entered on the roll or abstract' record.* R. '0. Seaton, Ass stent ssessor 77 ;� Pag e 2 of ., Code 08001 Assessment Nol, 2319, 'Murphy Pacific Marine Zalvage is erroneously assessed for personal property with assessed valuation of $120,x.50 since the assessee reported machi Code 08001 Assessment No. 2440s Texaco, inco is assessed for improvements with assessed valuation of $2--130. Through on assessor's error$ this assessment has been levied in the wrong name. An assessment is being added to the correct assessee on the 1971-72 roll. Code 82038 - Assessment No. 2248, Clarence E. and Unity R. Fulkerson are assessed for improvements with assessed valuation of $510. This assessment has been erroneously levied since the property had been sold before the lien date. An assessment is being added to correct assessee on the 1971-72 roll. Code 82038 - Assessment No. 2333* Mary N. 14iller is assessed for improvements with assessed valuation of $560. This assessment has been erroneously levied sines the property had been sold before the lien date. An assessment is being added to the correct assessee or. the 1971-72 roll. Code 82038 - Assessment No, 2360, Steven and Dorothy L, Parke are assessed for improvements with assessed valuation of $1,000. This assessment has been erroneously levied since the property had been sold before the lien date. An assessment is being added to eorract assessee on the 1971-72 roll. Code 82044 - Assessment No. 20113, Jack B. and Evelyn C. Ekstrom are assessed for improvements with assessed,valuation of $460. This assessment has been erroneously levied since the property- had ropertyhad been sold before the liendate. An assessment is being added to correct assessee on the 1971-72 rolls 1 5 JI, Page --4- of 5- - .......... ........... .............. ............ ........... ........... FURTIM, for the 1970-71 fiscal ;dear:' Code 82038 - Assessment No. `22b�, Steven and Dorothy L. Parke are assessed for improvements' with assessed valuation of lsOOO. This assessment has been erroneously levied since the property had been 'sold before the lien date An assessment is being added to the correctassessee` on the 1971-72 roll. I hereby consent to the 'above changes and/or 'corrections*, JOHN B. CLAUSEN, County Counsel' By. G" 6> R. 0. Seaton,; Assistant Assessor Deputyx Adopted by the Board this �� day of t�. �� ,►� RE90LUTION NO. 71/517 Page of