HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESOLUTIONS - 09102004 - 71-425 IN THE. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of Changes }
of the Assessment Roll } RESOLUTION NO. 71/425
of Contra Costa County }
}
WHEREAS, the County Assessor having filed with this Board requests
#or correction of erroneous assessments, said requests having been consented
to by the County Counsel;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County Auditor is
authorized to correct the following assessments.
For the Fiscal Year 19 6,xs 1970 - 1971
It has been ascertained by the assessor from an audit o
the assesses's books of account or ether papers that there has been
a defect of description or clerical error of the assesses in his
property statement or in other information or records furnished to
the assessor which caused the assessor to assess personal property
which should not have been assessed or to assess it at a substan-
tially
ub tan-tial3 y higher valuation than he would have entered can the roll if
the information had been correctly furnished; and,, therefore., pur-
suant to the Revenue and Taxation Cade, Section 4831.5, the assessor
certifies to the 'auditor that the following correction should be
made on the assessment roll..
Cods 02002 - Assessment No, 2869, Coburn Leasing Corp. is
erroneously assessed for personal property with; assessed valuation
of $10,880. A portion of the equipment has beenn assessed more than
ones ;since both losses and Lessor reported the same ,equipment
therefore this assessment should be corrected to show personal
property 17,530, resulting , in a reduction of $3,350-
R, . Seatont Aasistant .Assessor
cc: Assessor (G. Giese) Page l of 2
Auditor
---
Tax Collector
RESOLUTION NO. 71/425
It has been ascertained from the assessment roll and from
records in the assessor's office that taxes >>have'' been levied or
charged erroneously or illegally for the reasons as stated below,;
ands 'therefore s pursuant to the Revenue and 'Taxation. Code, Section
4986 >(1) (b), the following uncollected tax, penalty, or cost's
heretofore or hereafter levied or charged,, should be; cancelled in
whole' or in part on the following assessments:`'
Cade 66028 - Assessment; No.; 2173# Helen M* & Catherine S.
Pike are assessed for personal 'property with assessed valuation of
500 and improvements of .500. There has been an error of the
assessor in making; an estimated assessment with incomplete informa-
tions subsequent information revealing that the >business had been
closed and all of the equipment disposed of `.before the lien, date.
Thereforex this assessment "should be cancelled
FURTHER, for the 1969_70 fiscal year.
Code 62006 - ,assessment No. 2074, Hartl.y Fleis hma , Tr.,,
c/o, Hans Gelin, is erroneously assessed ,for personal property with
assessed valuation of $1,610, plus 1€% penalty for failure to file
within the time required by law Per Section 463 Revenue and Taxa-
tion Cade. `'here has been an error; of the assessor in =king an
arbitrary assessment with incomplete information$* subsequent
information revealing that 'the property,had been sold before the
lien date. Therefore, this assessment 'should be cancelled.
I hereby consent to the above
changes anal/oar corrections.-
JOHN
orrections.JOHN B. CLAUSEN, County Counsel
By
. geaton Deputy
Assistant Assessor
1571RESOLUTION NO. 71/425
Page 2 of 2