Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESOLUTIONS - 09102004 - 71-419 BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPIRVISORS OF COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, STATS OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of the Proposed ) Abatement of the Property of ) Gust G. & Nica Papagiannis ) RESOLUTION N0. 71/419 George G. & Josephine S. Padis) SAS it appears from the records of this Board that the Contra Costa County Building Inspector, acting in accordance with Sections 203 and H-1401-H-1002 of the Uniform Building Code, Volume III, and Sections 17014 et seq. of Title VIII of the California Administrative Code, having determined that the building(s) and/or improvement(s) located at 115 N. Hartz, Danville, Calif. and more particularly described as set forth in "Exhibit B," attached hereto, which is incorporated herein by reference, (is)(are) substandard and (is)(are) therefore a public nuisances and said Building Inspector having posted said property with Notice of Substandard BuilAIM and having notified the ovner(s) of said prop- erty that it is they are substandard in the manner provided by lax as appears more particularly from the declaration of the Building Inspector on file herein; and W MRW the said building(s) and/or improvement(s) (has)(have) not been repaired or removed as required by said Notice of Substandard Buildings) and/or Improvement(s), and MMUA3 said Building Inspector thereafter posted said property with Notice to Abate Nuisance, which notice specified the time and place of the hearing before this Board for the owners of said property to show cause why the buildings) and/or improveraent(s) thereon should not be condemned as a public nuisance, and the Building Inspector having notified the owners of said property of said hearing in the manner provided by lawn, as appears more particularly from the declaration of the Building Inspector on file heroins and W�iEfiR`AS the matter having came on for hearing by this Board on Tuesday, Tune 29, 1971 . at 11:00 - A.M./AX as provided in the notice hereinabove mentioneds and WHEREAS the owner of said property having app"red and having reques ° time within which to correct deficiencies of the said buil request" improvem and to abate the nuisance thereof, and the Bo considered the matter and co he hearing to Tuesday, at A.M./ Mo WHEREAS the owner property haed and having requested additional time writ ch to correct deficiencies ofding(s) and/or improvement to abate the nuisance thereof, and the Board ha idered the r and continued the hearing to Tuesday, A.M./P.M. Abatement Resolution Fils Not 3-D-1962 Page 1 of 4 #.3, 2-70, 300 RESOLUTION NO. 71/419 EAS the Board having considered the evidence presented by said Building Inspector and all other interested parties, the follo a pears and this Board now finds that said builg dins) and/or improvement(a) s)(are) sub- standard aux defined in Sections H-1001 and H-1002 of the Uniform Building Code, Volume III, by reason of the following deficiencies whish are hereby found to exists See "Exhibit A" attached hereto which is incorporated herein by reference. BE IT TERUWM RESOLVED that said building(s) and/or improvement(s) (is)(are) substandard and (is)(are) declared to be a public nuisance and the owners thereof are hereby ordered to abate said nuisance within 30 days after a copy of this resolution, together with notice thereof, has been posted to said property. BE IT FURTMM RESOLVED that it is the conclusion of this Board that said building(s) and/or improvement(s) cannot be reconstructed or repaired in a &&nner so as to comply with the provisions of Article 8, Chapter 9 of Title VIZI of the California Administrative Code or the Uniform Building Code, Volume III, as incorporated in the Contra Costa County Ordinance Code and therefore said building(s) and/or improvement(s) must be rased and removed. IT IS FURTM ORDEPM that if said nuisance is not abated within the time allowed, said nuisance will be abated by the Building Inspector of this county, and the expense thereof made a lien upon the land upon which said build ing(s and/or improvement(s) (is)(are) located. PASSED AND ADOPTED on .Tune 29, 1973 by the following votes AYESt Supervisors Kenny, Dias, Moriarty, and Boggess NOESs None ABSFWTs Supervisor Linscheid Abatement Resolution Pile Not 3-D-1952 Page 2 of 4 EXHIBIT "A" I . Defective or deteriorated flooring and floor supports. Violation U.B.C. Vol . III Sect. 14100t(c)2. 2. Supporting members of stairs and other vertical supports that lean, list or buckle due to defective mbterial or deterioration. Violation of U.B.C. Vol. III Sect. H1001(+c)4. 3. Lack of, or Improper water closet, lavatory, tub or shower In a dwelling unit. Violation of U.S.C. Vol . III Sect. H1001 (b)1 , 4. Lack of hot and cold running water to plumbing fixtures in a dwelling unit. Violation 11.B.C, Vol . fit Sect. 141001 (b)5* 5. Lack Of adequate heating facilities. V19iation U.B.C. Vol . fit Sect. H1£341 (b)6. 6. General dilapidation or Improper maintenance. Violation U-18-C. Vol. III Sect. HIOOI(b)13. 7. An attractive nuisance which may prove detrimental to children and which may prove to bre a hazardfor Inquisitive minors. Violation U.8 C. Vol,- III Sect. HIOGI ('d)b. 8. Hazardous wiring Violation U.B.C. Vol . III Sect. HI'C(3I (e). 4• faulty weather protection. Violation U.B.C. Vol . 111 .Sectt. H1001 (h) 2# 10. Fire hazard In the opinion of the Fire Chief. Violation U.8, C. Vol. 1 r"1 Sect. HIOOI (I ), If . Inadequate maintenance and an unsafe building. Violation U.B.C. Vol . III Sect. H1001 (1 ), File No: 3-D-1362 Page 3 of 4 77 t 2 1 EXHIBIT A That Marcel of land in the. County of Contra Costa, State of California, described as follows. t Portion of the Rancho San Ramon, described as follows Beginning at the intersection of the north line of Prospect ,Avenue with the west line of Hartz Avenue, as said Avenues now (October 1944) exist in the Town of Danville; thence from said point of beginning north 380 45' west along..said west line 79.74 feet; thence south 51°12' west, 115.54 feet to a 2" x 2" hub in a � fence "dine; thence south 46* 361 east along said fence Line and � the continuation thereof, at 77.20 feet, a cross cut in walk on the building line, 87.21 feet to the said north line of- Prospect Avenue, thence north 4T 30' east along said north line, 103.85 feet to the paint of beginning. t.' S M j Jff ( N Page 4 of 4