HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESOLUTIONS - 09102004 - 71-375 BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF
COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, STATS OF CALT.MMIA
In the Matter of the Proposed )
Abatement of the Property of } 71/375
RESOLUTION NO.
}
Walter & Alberta V. Polk }
}
WAS it appears from the records of this Board that the Contra Costa
County Building Inspector, acting in accordance with Sections 203 and H-1001-H-1002
of the Uniform Building Code, Volutme III, and Sections 17014 et seq. of Title VIII
of the California Administrative Code, having determined that the building(s) and/or
improvement(s) located at
1736 5th St. , N. Richmond
and more pparrticularly described as set forth in "Exhibit B," attached hereto,
which is incorporated herein by reference, (is)(are) substandard and (is)(are)
therefore a public nuisance# and said Building Inspector having posted said property
with Notice of Substandard Building and having notified the ovner(s) of said prop-
erty that Zit is they are-3 substandard in the manner provided by lax as appears
more particularly from the declaration of the Building Inspector on file herein= and
WHEREAS the said building(s) and/or improvement(s) (has)(NS F) not been
repaired or removed as required by said Notice of Substandard Building(s) and/or
Improvenent(s), and
WHEREAS said Building Inspector thereafter posted said property with
Notice to Abate Nuisance, which notice specified the time and place of the hearing
before this Board for the owners of said property to show cause why the building(s)
and/or improvement(s) thereon should not be condemned as a public nuisance, and the
Building Inspector having notified the owners of said property of said hearing in
the manner provided by lax, as appears more particularly from the declaration of
the Building Inspector on file hereint and
WAS the matter having coarse on for hearing by this Board on Tuesday,
June 8, 1971 . at 10;40 A.M.)"X as provided in the notice
hereinabove mentioned; and
WHEREAS the owner of said property having appeared and having--requested
sinal time within which to correct deficiencies of the sadd- s) and/or
improveme` a- to abate the nuisance thereof, and tae--Board having considered
the mutter and continue acing to Tuesday„_ —
at A.M./P.M. =� "
`SEAS the owne said property having appetikod--and..,having requested
additional time vit ch to correct deficiencies of the said bu223ng(a.)_ and/or
improvement to abate the nuisance thereof, and the Board having consideree
the �,tt� and continued the hearing to Tuesday,
apt-- A.M./P.M.
Abatement Resolution
File Not 1-D-2211
Page 1 of 4
#13, 2-70, 300
RESOLUTION Tv O- 71/375
WHEREAS the Board having considered the evidence presented by said
Building Inspector and all other interested parties, the folio a ars and
this Board now finds that said building(s) and/or improvesment(a iMWW)c sub-
standard as defined in Sections H-1001 and H-1002 of the Uniform Building Code,
Volume III, by reason of the following deficiencies which are hereby found to
exists
See "Exhibit A" attached hereto which is incorporated
herein by reference.
BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED that said building(s) and/or improvement(s)
Us)(==) substandard and (is)Csma declared to be a public nuisance and the
owners thereof are hereby ordered to abate said nuisance within 30 days after a
copy of this resolution, together with notice thereof, has been posted to said
property.
BB IT FURTHER RESOLVED that it is the conclusion of this Board that
said building(s) and/or improvement(s) cannot be reconstructed or repaired in
a manner so as to comply with the provisions of Article 8, Chapter 9 of Title VIII
of the California Administrative Code or the Uniform Building Code, Volume III,
as incorporated in the Contra Costa County Ordinance Code and therefore said
building(s) and/or improvement(s) must be ranted and removed.
IT IS FURTHER ORDOREJ that if said nuisance is not abated within the
time allowed, said nuisance will be abated by the Building Inspector of this
county, and the expense thereof made a lien upon the land upon which said build-
ing(s) and/or improvement(s) (is) ) located.
PASSED AND ADOPTED on _ . June 8, 1971by the following votes
AYESs Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, W. N. Boggess,
E. A. Linscheid
NOESt None
ABSENTt None
Abatement Resolution
File Not 1-D-2214
Page 2 of 4
__.........__.....__... ..................
EXHIBIT "A"
1. Structural hazards caused by improper original construction, rot and termite
damage, settled wiring and vandalism.
2. Electrical, heating and plumbing hazards caused by lack of maintenance,
unapproved changes and alterations and vandalism.
3. Nuisance as defined by the Uniform Building Code, Volume III.
File No: 1-D-2214
Third Notice page 3 of 4
.�
PXHI13IT"B"
That parcel of land in the County of Contra Costa, State
or California, described as follows:
'portion of Lot 29, all of Lot 30, and portion of Lot 31,
Block 10, mag of North Richmond Land and Terry Company Tract No. 1,
filed July 110 1910, ?lap Book 3, page 59, Contra Costa County
records, described as follows :
Beginning on the east line of Fifth Street, formerly Fourth
Street, distant thereon southerly, 15 feet from the north line
of saki Lot 29; thence from said point of beginning, easterly,
parallel with the north line of said Lot 29, 55 feet ; thence
northerly, parallel with the east line of said Fifth Street,
10 feet; thence easterly. paral.l:el. with the north line of said
Lot 290 45 feet to the east line thereof; thence northerly, along
said east line and -along the east lines of said Lots 30 and 31,
40 feet; thence westerly, parallel with the south line of said
Lot 30* 100 feet to the 'east line of' said Fifth Street; thence
southerly, along said east line, 50' feet to the point of beginning.
r
Page 4 of 4
File No: 1-D-2214
Third Notice
h 7
t