HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESOLUTIONS - 09102004 - 71-340 IN T14E BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of Changes }
of the Assessment Roll ) RESOLUTION No. 71/340
of Contra Costa County }
}
WHEREAS, the County Assessor having filed with this Board requests
for correction of erroneous assessments, said requests having been consented
to by the County Counsel,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County Auditor is
authorized to correct the following assessments:
For the Fiscal, Year -J 2 ,1 1970-71
It has been ascertained from the assessment roll and from
records in the assessor's office that taxes: have been levied or
charged erroneously or illegally for the reasons as stated below;
and, therefore, pursuant to the Revenue and Taxation Cade, Section
4986 (1) (a), the following uncollected taxs penalty, or costs
heretofore or hereafter levied or charged,, should be cancelled in
whole or in part on the fallowing a:ssessmOnts
Code 82038 - Assessment No, 2465, Shell Oil Company is
assessed for improvements with assessed valuation, of $450, This
assessment has been levied more than once since it has also been
assessed to the station operator.
AND.. FURTHER., under Section 4986 (1) (b)
+Cade 820 - Assessment No. 20210 Jay and Elva F. McCrary
are assessed for improvements with assessed valuation of $630.
This is an erroneous assessment since it was levied against the
wrong assessee. An assessment is being added to the correct
assessee on the 1971-72 roll.
. 5. SeMn-, lisisiani Isigis3i
RESCLUTIO NO. 71/340
cc: Assessor (G. Giese)
Page l of
Auditor
Tax Collector
MTHERR, for the 1969-70 fiscal year:
Cade 82044 - Assessment No* 2016, Jay and Elva F. McCrary
are assessed for improvements with assessed valuation of >$530-
Th s is an erroneous assessment since it was levied against the
wrong assesses. An assessment is being added to the correct
assesses on the 1971-72 roll,
FURTHER, for the 1968-89 fiscal year:
Code 82€44 « Assessment No* 2311, Jag and Elva F. MoGrar;
are assessed for improvements with assessed valuation of $1.80.
This is an erroneous assessment since it was levied against the
wrong assesses. An assessment is being added to the correct
assesses on the 1971-72 roll.
I hereby consent to the above"
changes and/or corrections
JOHN B. QTAMSENI, County Counsel
Byf, .._:....
R. 6: Seaton Depctty>
Assistant assessor
Adopted by 11-h2 Board this day of
. �
Page 2; of