HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESOLUTIONS - 08312004 - 70-634 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA.',
In the Matter of Changes }
of the Assessment Roll } RESOLUTION NO 701634
of''Contra Costa County )
WHEREAS, the County Assessor having filed with this Board requests
for correction of erroneousassessments, said requests having been consented
to by the District Attorney!
NQ''VV, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County Auditor is
authorized to correct the following assessments:'
For the Fiscal Year 1410., 194 71
It has been ascertained from the assessment roll and from
papers in the Assessort s office what was intended and what;:should
have been assessed* anal, therefore, pursuant to Section 4831 of the
Revenue and 'Taxation Code, the following homeowners whose claims
were filed within the time allowed by law, should be allowed the
Homeowner's Exertion in the 'amount stated below:
In Code Area. 2008, Fel. No, 114-098-003, Arthur C. Langford
i s not entered with homeowner's exempi on 'clue to information on
distribution of real' property through'' divorce action was required
to clarify ownership. Necessary information has been provided
therefore., homeowners s ere tion, in the amount of 50 should be
allowed,
In Code Area 3000$ Pel. No. 543-431-017, Hung & Irene A, Chow
are not entered 'with home uner►s ' exemption as additional Information',
was necessary to clarify residence.and occupancy. Necessary inform..
ation has been provided, _ therefore, homeowner's exemption in the
amount of $750 should be allowed.
In Code' area 74031, Pal. No. 085-146-001, Beatri.x Lloyd is not
entered with homeowner's >exemption due to clerical error in checking
residence address. Necessary information has been, provided, there-
for homeowner's exemption. in the amount of $750 should be allowed,
�/IV +I�/MMrr1.
6. VIM,`, Assistant Assessor
September 22, 1970
Copy to * Assessor - Kris
Auditor 2
Tax Collector Page 2 of 3
RESOLUTION NO. 70/634
.............................................................................
In Code Area 9006# Pei No. 171-133-0010 T. Preston &
Frances Walters are not entered with homeowner's exemption
as additional information was necessary to clarify ownership
and occupancy. Necessary information has been provided.,
therefore, homeowner ts exemption In the amount of $750 should
be allowed,
In Code Area 60008, Pei No., 003-140--005,, Frances Coelho
Vierra Is not entered with homeowner's. exemption due to dis-
crepancy in Ming claim on her principal place of residence.
Information has been provided., therefore,, homeownerts exemption
In the amount of V50 should be allowed,
In Code Area 660062 Pei No. 217-010-003, Eugene R. Carringer
is not entered with homeovner' s exemption as it was necessary to
obtain a copy of the agreement of sale. Information has been
provided., therefore., homeowner's exemption in the amount of $750
should be allowed,
In Code Area 66093., Pei 218-124-003, James M. & Catherine
M. Hastings are not entered with homeowner's exemption as
additional information was necessary to clarify residence and
occupancy. Necessary information has been provided,, therefore,
homeowner's exemption in the amount of .17% should be allowed.
In Code Area 76049$ Pei No. 377-030*.002, Laura M, Williams
is not entered with homeowner's exeuption as additional inform-
ation was required to establish ownership and occupancy through
divorce action. Necessary information has been provided.. there«
Fore, homeowner's exemption In the amount of $75-0 should be
allowed,
in code Area 66048s Pei. No* 199-322-041,, Lola I. Marhold
was erroneously allowed the homeowner's exemption. Information
has been provided whereas she did not occupy the home as her
principal place of residence, therefore$ homeownerts exemption
of $750 should be removed,
In Code Area 76o4g,, Pei. No. 380--070--008., John J. & Clara
Johnson Ts erroneously allowed the homeowner's exemption. Inform-
ation has been received from the property owners whereas they are
receiving OAS and are not eligible for the homeownerts exemption,,
therefore, exemption in the amount of $750 should be removed,
In Code Area 83004, Pei. No. 264-063-001, Janes T. Hurst
Is not entered with hom- eownerts exemption as additional information
was necessary to clarify ownership and occupancy through divorce
action. Necessary information has been provided* therefores home-
owner ts exemption of $750 should be allowed,
In Accordance with Section 255,1 of the Revenue and Taxation
Code a timely claim had been fileds howevert information was
lacking as to the social security number, This information has
been providedo therefore, homeowner's exemption in the amount of
$750 should be allowed in Code 8007, Pel. No. 538-100-013 to
Florence L* Powers4
1&el ezor���
Page 2 of 3
R. 0. S
MON
Assistant Assessor
RESOLUTION NO. 70/634
In accordance with Assembly Concurrent Resolution No. 246,
the following should be allowed the Romeo-vmert's Exemption as
shown, below:
In Code Area. 3000J. Pel. No. 502-203-009, David A, & Cora
P. Hughes, Allow 0750 he ownerts exemption.
In Code Area 5001, Pel, No, 372-092-oo5, Stanley Mc Namara,
Allow $750 homeowner t s exemption.
In Code Area 8001, Pel. No, 514-250-012, George P, (Jr) &
Gladgs M. Newcomb, Allow ' 750 homeownert s exemption.
I hereby consent to the above
R. p, IMITOW changes and/or corrections:
Assistant Assessor
JOHN B. CLAUSEN., COUNTY CWWSRL
JJ F 4
September 220 1970 r f _
By. fzx r
i
Deputy
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 29th day of September, 1970.
RESOLUTION Na. 70/634.
Page 3 of 3