Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESOLUTIONS - 08312004 - 70-606 ''I'll'',............. ................. ............4 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Changes of the Assessment Roll RESOLUTION No. 70/606 of Contra Costa County WHEREAS, the County Assessor having filed with this Board requests tor correction of erroneous assessments, said requests having been consented to by the District Attorney; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County Auditor is authorized to correct the following assessments: 1970-1171 For the Fiscal Year 196-zw-196- It has been ascertained from the assessment roll and from papers in the A-seessorts offiee what was Intended and what should have been ss,sessed; and, therefore, pursuant to Revenue and Taxa. tion Code 4831., the following defects in description and/or form and clericalerrors of the assessor on the roll should be corrected to remove or allow exemption asshown below,.- In Code Area 1000p Pel. No* 066"l84**oio.. Daniel J. Grace Is erroneously not entered with veteran's exemption,, due to addit.- ional Information being necessary to clarify his value of insurance, Necessary information has been provided and veterans, examption in the amount of ItI.,000 should be allowed* In Code Area 1000* Pel. No, 071-113-021t David Freitas is not entered with vaterants exemption >as additional information was necessary in eaculating the value of his assets. The necessary information has been providadv therefore veterants . exemption in the amount of $1000 should be allowed and homeowner's exemption of $750 should be removed. In Code Area 2002, Pel, No. Ill-111-013., Jack H, Sawdey is entered with homeownerts exemption of $750 , due to clerical error in calculating the ValUO of his assets on the veteran's exemption cla1m, Therefore, homeowner's exemption >of $750 should be removed and veterants exemption of $10000 should be allowed, R-- 0:o SEATON A;sistant Assessor September 221-5$ 1970 Copy to: Assessor - Kris Page I of 3 Auditor Tax Collector Resolution No. 70/606 ............. ....................................I................................................................................ .................................-............. in Code Area 2002, Pel. Not. 112•*173-014, Beulah<T. Parscal was allowed a via teran.t s exemption in error. Additional information has been received on property owed in another state whereas the valuation of the property had increased in assessed value, therefore, the property holdings ex eek . the limitation and the veterants exemp. tion of 1*000 should be M owed. and homeowner t s exemption of '$750 should be allowed, In Code Area 2002, Pol, No. 114-165-0020 Kay M, Luke< was erroneously not allowed a veteran's exemption due to clericalerror in not beim sent to data processing. Therefore, exemption in the amount of $i#000 should be al lowed, In Code Area, 2003s Poi. No 120-291-022., Clark H, Sprague is not entered with veterants exemption due to clerical error in the assessed value of his property. In calculating the value of his assets, he now qualifys for the veteran's exemption, therefore,, veteran's exemption of 41,000 should be allowed and the homeownert s exemption of 750 should be removed,. In Code Area 7001, Pel. No, 073-252-016s Marshall Jones is not entered with veterents exemption, due to additional information being necessary to complete his claim. The information has been provided and veteran's exemption in the amount of $1.000 should be allowed and homeowner's exemption of $750 should be removed,, In Cade Area -8002' Pel. No. 51€*-133 008 John 1 Crowley is not entered with veterants exemption, due to additional Information beim necessary to clarify the value of his assets, Information has been provided and veterents exemption in the amount of 1 CAO should: be allowed, In Code Area 12€118, Pel, leo. 149-073-010, George W Mattey was erroneously allowed the veterants exemption due to clerical error in calculating the value of his assets. Veteran's exemption of 1*000 should be removed and homeowner's exemption. of $754 should be allowed.,, In Code Area 12052, Pct. No. 154-261«oo4, Arthur N,� Le Munyon Is not entered with veteran's exemption due to additional information necessary to elarify his declaration. Information has been provided, therefore, exemption in the amount of $1#000 E3a4 should be allowed, In Code Area 12075, Pcl, No. 152-252-011t Wilbur P Black was not allowed veterants exemption as additional information was necess- ary to clarify his declaration. Information has been provided,, there- fore, veteran's exemption in the amount of $1#000 should be allowed and home owner f e exemption of $750 should be removed, In Code Area 66097: Pel, No. 210--393-x007, Leonard S. & Patricia L, Lewis are not entered with veteran's exemption as additional information as to value of property In another county was not avail- able. Informal ti can s been furnished, therefore, exemption of 2000 should be allowed and $750 homeowrert s exemption 'removed,; or R. 0. SEATON Assistant Assessor Page 2 of 3 70/606 In Code ,Area 62037: Bcl, No 357-242-,033o Donald Brooks in not entered with veterant's exemption as iaormation from Alameda C oun tit on ad di ti ani. property was, net available. The information has been provided and veteran qualifies for the e�ernpt3on , there» fore, exemption in the amount of 1,000 should be allowed and $750 homegwnert s exemption removed, In Cede .Area, 79031,; Pcl Noo 09 7wO21«029, John Vieira was not entered with veteran.R>s exemption due to clerical error in calculating the value of his assets. Information has been pre,. vided, therefore, exemption in the amount of tl000 should be allowed and homeowner's exemption of $750 should be removed,, In Cade .Area 76006, Pol. No, 376-101-014, John E. Ford is not _entered with veteran's exemption due to legal decision on divorce action, Information has been providedt therefore., veteran's exemption in the amount of 10000 should be allowed end $750 home- owner;s exemption removed, In Code' ,Area 79€12, Pcl No. €396-032-029, Vernon. Meeker was not entered with veteran's exemption due to clerical error in not being sent to data. processing. 'Therefor-at; exemption in the amount of $1,004 should be allowed. In Code ,Area 79077, Pel, No* 100-312-005, Charles U. Waters was erroneou,j ly not allowed a veteran's exemption due to clerical error in not bei,n sent to data proeessing. Therefore, exemption: in the amount of .00 should be allowed* In Cade Area 85120, Pel. No 435-031-0260 William G. Beck was not ''entered with 'veteran's exemption due to clerical error in net beim sent to data processing Therefore,, exemption in the amount of $i,000 should be allowed and homeowner's exemption of 75© should be removed,;; In Code Area 980020 Pcl, No, 184-422-007s, Robert L. Brady was, not entered with 'v'eteran's exemption date to clerical error in eal. culating the value of his assets. Therefore, exemption' in the amount of $1s,000 should be a.l.lowed and hom ow ert s exezrPti.on of $750 should be removed, R. 0: MT-ON ,Assessor' I hereby consent to the corrections and changes in the above resolution. JOBN B. CLAUSEN.. County a ouns el D"Uty Page 3of3