HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESOLUTIONS - 08302004 - 70-558 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of Changes }
of the Assessment Roll } RESOLUTION NO. 70/558
of Contra Costa County }
}
WHEREAS, the County Assessor having filed with this Board requests
for correction, of erroneous assessments, said requests having been consented
to by the District Attorney;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County Auditor is
authorized to correct the following assessments'
For the Fiscal Year 19410. 199-71
It has been ascertained froy.a the assessment roll and from
records in the assessor' s office that taxes have been levied or
charged erroneously or illegally for the reasons as stated below;
and, therefore pursuant to the Revenue and Taxation Code, Section
4986 (1.) (b), the following uncollected tax, penalty, or costs
heretofore or hereafter levied or charged, should: be cancelled in
whole or in past on the following assessment.
Code 08001 - Assessment No. 2940, Doge Jackson and Betty
14:orlan ,are erroneously assessed: for possessory interest in land
with assessed valuation of 40 and improvements of 1110 and net
assessed value 150. Tenant terminated residency within six months
of the 'lien date. On month-to-month rental, possessory Interest
is considered to be of no valueifoccupancy terminates less than
six months after the lien date, or prior to August 31, 1970.
Termination of occupancy after assess eat has been made and within
six months of the lien date constitutes an opinion_ of no value.
Therefore, in accordance with assesso.r►s policy, this assessment
should be cancelled.
R. . ' ea on, Pks9 s 9nT Messor
eptember 1, 1970
RESOLUTION NO. 70/558
cc! sksessor (G. Giese)
Auditor Page 1 of'.
Tax Collector
It has been asoortained, from the asses�sm- ent roll, and from
passers in the a sessort s> Office what ixas, intended and whatshould
have n assessed.,• `, nd., there are$ pursuant o Revenue �d TaXa-
tion codeSalo the f 0110wing detects' in desori tion an .dor form
and clerical. errors 'o.t the assessor on the roll should be cor-
rected :
or-
re ted :
Codi 13000 - AssessMart No. 2014,' H. A* ZiantaXa is
assessed for personal property. with assessed. valuation of 5100 '
and improvements of $ 0.1, less business-Inventory exemption Of,
6 his 1s an erroneous as essMent 'sin.6oth6re ha.s been amathe-
xma ical error of the assessor in pom- putatioril* therefore$ the roll
should be corrected to show Personal 'property 90, no ehange in
improvements or business' inventory exemption*
Code 82038 Assessment ljo. 2428,' H. A., and Ustelle Thrush '
,are errs:;neousl.y ', ass�?ss�d �`ar' 1xrprr�ve��ents with assessed valuation
, of '> 0 000 since there bis been. bes-
na atioel error o the assessor
in. placing a d,ecil zal: point' . TherOff,or , this assessment should be
orraeted to show I prevOM' enta 32s320
It has been ascertained. froft the <assessment roll and from
.records in the assessor's afice that taxes have been levied or
charged erroneously Or illegall. >ror the (reason's as stated below,
and, there ore$ pursuant to the A e and. TaxationCode,*l eetion
s the f 1lo ixuncoil acted tax, penalty, or casts
heretofore r hax�ea 'ter levied or chargeds should< b�; Can in
whole or in part on the 'fol owin assessment*
Cade 08007 - . .s eaaMent Inc. 2046, Eur--Pe corporation 1t
erroneously assessed for personal, property with a valuation of
110 less 'business inventor exempt on or Th1s asaesem.sn
hat boon l ov ed' more the once, being a du e�ate of �asap asment
No* 0800-1-3310; therefore, this assessment should, be cancelled..
f: MIIrr►
R-77
. Seaton,: ss s an ssessor
September 1, 19,70
fff
Page ..2.,'' of
PU'RMR, f or the 1969-70 f i s cal. ;j`ear
It has been a eartalned hthe assessor froxa An audit of
the assesses} betas of :40:00unt .or ether papers that them ;has been
a defect of deseription Or clerlea error �f the asses ee ,fin his
rapert statement or n other A
nforkation or records furx :�h di to
theassessor =&ieh caudae the € sSes or
to assess Parsenal Property
which should not have: been assessed or toiassoos it at as44, an--
tia ly higher valuation than he would have enterodl on the roll if
the maticaxx had been Corre 0,tly fu.rnis ed; iijad, therefore$ p�zr
suant to the Revenue and. Taxation Code, 9 ct On 488 l the assessor
eartifies to the auditor that the fallowing Correoti,ons should be
made on 'the assessment roll
CedeC2 - sesamenti * ? r an audit dsossd that
Joseph R.4 Cedchlni, et alp a�� erraneQusl� asesssed fpr personal
pro arty, with a ra ua, :: 04 of 1 , 8i�.ce to pa er in l ded aahin `
and>equpent can' Riaaus�.xxess prc�perty� stat�ment that ti�as els® #n»
lndad x arealrtapert asessxUllerefor+s, this asssazerzt
shouldbecorrected o skew prsebal prcpet� *51 ��' , result .ng in
a re ua ti on. of qt%230.
wede', 53009 - I.asseaament go. 20 �l, an audit dizel:o �,s that
H Sailboats, Inc. is errone. . r personal Pro i*tv
with assdAsad valuation of 19,87Q� sine rho ta�pa�ar x*epq�ted
houseboats that :had been sold, Beare the lien date. erefara this
assessment should be carre tod to shop Personal proper y , 18,E940,
result.lng In a reduction of $896.
1 hereby cansnt o the:
corrsgtiOns a.nd chanes in
the above rezdlutlm.
JOS B. CIADS County Counsel
W..-
deputy.
September 1, >197:
Adopted by the Board this day of
RE
SOLMIG Na. 70I5�8
Page Of