HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESOLUTIONS - 08302004 - 70-557 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of Changes
of the Assessment Rall j RESOLUTION NO, 74/557
of Contra Costa County
WHEREAS, the County Assessor having filed with this Board requests
for correction of erroneous assessments, said requests having been consented
to by the District Attorney;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County Auditor is
authorized to correct the following assessments:
70
For the Fiscal Year 1'9:6- 10*,71
It has been ascertained from the assessment roll and from
papers in the Assessor's office what was intended and what should
have been assessed; and., therefore, pursuant to Section 11.831 of the
Revanue and Taxation Code, the following defects in description
and/car form and clerical error of the assessor on the roll should
be corrected:
In. Code Area 2001, Rel. No. 117-160-426 is erroneously
entered under this cede area. This assessment should be removed
from Cade .Area. 2001 and be entered in Code Area 7'4172.
In Code Area 2442, Pei. No. ll'-192-014, Filma Leiths and
Rina Waddell are erroneously assessed with Improvement value of
, 21,2') inasmuch as property statement indicating a larger I prove-
rnent va.l.ue was received prior to close of assessment roll, but it
was impossible to process it -in time for entry before the .-oil was
submitted for machine processing. Improvement value should be cor-
reated to read: 122,7 0, with no charge in Land, value, making a
Total Assessed Value of >,. ,030. Assessees have been in—formed of
this 00-orection.
In Code area. 001, Pei. Wr. 372-382-008, Dominic & Mary
Balastr eri. have been allowed Ro: eowner t s Exemption of X750— It has
been determined that the claimants receive Old Age Assistance which
ua'lce s the�m ine 1".gi bl.e for the exemption. This assessment should be
correction to re:nao re the t7'-O Ro; eowner i s Exemption.
00,
. SEATGN
Assistant Assessor RESOLUTION NO. 70/557
Copy to: Assessor (Ids) Pagel of 3
Auditor .� _....
Tax Collector
In Code area. 7001, Pol. 073-010-007, Johns-Manville Corpo-
ration is erroneously assessed with Improvements of $680 as assessment
for such improvements was also i.n.cluded in another parcel. This
assessment should be corrected to remove all. improvement value,
leaving the same Land value of *19,450. R
In Code Area: 7001, Pcl. 073-171 008, Johns-Manville Corpo-
ration is erroneously assessed with .Tmprove ents of ;`3314 as assessment
for such improvements was also included in another parcel. This
assessment should be corrected to remove the improvement value,
leaving the same Land value of $1440-
In
1440wIra Code Area 7001, Pol. 087-173-01.9, assessed to :Francis W.
and. Eleanor F. Straub, Francis W. Straub Filed a timely claim for the
iQmeown- er t s Exemption., but was denied. It has since been determined.
that Mr. Straub is eligible for the Homeownerts Exemption inasmuch as
he and Eleanor -were legally separated as of March. 1, 1970. This assess-
ment should be corrected to allow the Homeowner's Exemption of X750.
In Code area 7001, Fol. No- 073-113-022, assessed to
Salvatore J. & Virginia M. Seeno, Wayne and Darlene Folks were erron-
eously allowed. the Homeowner is Exemption of .$750. It has been deter-
mined 'that the claimants were not the owners- and occupants as of Marcia 1,
1970. This assessment should. be corrected to re-ole the Homeowner's
Exemption of *750.
In Code Area 13000, 'Pel. 'No. 119--050-011, Matilda Pape has
been erroneously allowed the Homeowd.er t s Exemption of $750. It has
been established that claimant receives Old Age Assistance which dis-
qualifies her for the exemption. This assessment should be corrected
to remove the Homeowner's Exemption of $750.
In Code Area 53004, Pel. No. 051--092-007, assessed to
Joseph D. and Jacqui.ta J. Frew, is erroneously numbered due to clerical
error.' This parcel should be No. 051-092-010 and should be described
as .25 acres. The assessment is based on the correct acreage and. the
value remains unchanged.
In Code Area 66035, Pel. No. 2006-182-013, C. and.J z. r-
B. have er have eousl�Yll=
d th w&o s s emption of
� 7 based an claim submi.tt:� R & Bea H. Sutton. It has
been dete i h -t-tie l..almants were not d occupants
"arch 1, 1970. This exemption should be removed. " -----
In Code Area 815098, Pol. No. 409-262-003, Boyd P. & luven,ia
Wilson' are erroneously assessed with Improvement value of $9900 based
on incorrect d:escri:ption, of incomplete structure on the lien date. This
assessment should be corrected to chair: the Improvement value to $5600,
with no change in ;sand value of $1160, aaking a Total Assessed Value
of 4,6760.
77.70. SEATOW 70 /5577
Assistant Assessor
Page 2 of 3
:UR71-4ER, it has been asc rta,�.ned from the assessment roll
end from records in the' As,sessor ;s office that taxes have been. levied
or changed erroneousl ` or illegally for the reasons as stated below;
and, therefore, pursuant to the Revenue and. `laxation Code, Section
?986 (l) (b), the following uncollected tax, penalty, or costs hereto-
fore or hereafter levied or charged, should be cancelled in whale on
the following assessment:
In Cade Area 7200 5,, Pal.. No. 020-090-01.1, Alexander G. and
Myrtle j F. Pilcron are sr oneQ isly assessed for property described. as
Portion. see 32 '2N R3E' MMBM Ex M/P, .08 acres, which property did not
exist as a. separate parcel. This assessment should be deleted, and
all taxes, penalties, or costs heretofore or hereafter levied or
charged thereon, shouldbe cancelled.
S hereby consent to the
AZA���
correctionssand changes ;t.,n
th.e above resolution.
R. 0 v A q
Assistant ,Assessor JCS B. CJ�Ux ENT, County Counsel
f
by 3
Deputy
Adopted by the Board this � day of 1-
RESOLUTION NO. 70/557
Page 3 of 3