HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESOLUTIONS - 08042003 - 70-466 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of Changes }
of the Assessment Roti } RESOLUTION NO. 74/466
of Contra Costa County }
WHEREAS, the County Assessor having filed with,this Board requests
for correction of erroneous assessments, said requests having been consented
to by the District Attorney;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLV'E'D that the County Auditor is
authorized to correct the following assessments:
For the Fiscal Year cx 1970-71
It has been ascertained from the assessment roll and from
papers in the assessor's office what was intended and what should
have been assessed; and, therefore, pursuant to Revenue and Taxa-
tion Code 4831, the following defects in description and/or form
and clerical errors of the assessor on the roll should be cor-
rected:
Code 79187 - Assessment No. 2047, Walter J. Imfeld is
assessed for personalroperty with assessed valuation of $200 plus
10 percent penalty of $20 (penalties added in accordance with
section 463 of the Revenue & Taxation Code) and .net assessed value
$220. There has been an assessor'=e error in spelling of asse3sseees
name. It should be corrected to read: "Jolter Infield, Jr. , with
values remaining the some.
Cade 02020 _ Assessment No. 23.49, Roos/Atkins, Inc. is
erroneously assessed for personal property with assessed valuation.
$99,710 and improvements 1$36,990, less business inventory exemption
of $23,076, and net assessedvalue Of *113o624. Inasmuch as a
portion of the improvement value was also assessed on the secured
assessment roll this assessment should be corrected to read;
improvements *24,950 with no change in the personal property or
business inventory exemption, making a net assessed values of
$101,58}x.
R. 0. ea cin', ss sunt ssessor
July 28, 1970
cc: assessor (G. Giese)
:��udi.tor
Page Z ofd
Tax Collector
RESOLUTION NO. 70/466
It has been ascertained by the assessor from an audit of
the assessee's books of account or other papers that there has been
a defect of description or clerical error of the assessee in his
property statement or in ;other information or records furnished., to
the assessor which caused the assessor to assess personal property
which should not have been assessed or to >assess it at a substan-
tially higher valuation than. he would have entered can the roll if
the information had been: correctly furnished; and, therefore, pur-
suant to the Revenue and Taxation Code.$ Section 4831.5> the assessor
certifies to the auditor that the following correction should be
made on the 'assessment rol •
Code 09000 - Assessment No. 2993, ',Robert B, Hansen is
erroneously assessed for personal' property with assessed valuation
of $1,090 and improvements of $680, less business inventory exemp-
tion $120 and net assessed value $1,75$. The assessee wrongly
reported a sign that had been disposed of prior to the lien date;
therefore the roll should be ''corrected to> read. improvements $150'
with no change in the personal property or business inventory`
exemptiono making a net assessed value of ''$10228.
It has been ascertained from the assessment roll and from
records in the assessor's office that taxes have been levied or
charged erroneously or illegally .for the reasons as stated below;
and, therefore, pursuant to the Revenue and Taxation Code, Section.
4986 (1) (a) , the following uncollected tax, penalty, or costs
heretofore or hereafter levied or charged should be cancelled' in
whole or in, part on the following assessments:
code 05001 - Assessment No.. 2057, Jackee D. St angbelini
is erroneously assessed for personal property with. a valuation of
$470 and improvements of $1,180. This assessment has been levied
more than once, ''being a duplicate of Assessment No. 14010-23190
AN, FUURT"EIER, under Section 4986 (1) (b)
Cade 01001 - Assessment Yo, 2012.. Lifton,, ,'Inc . is errone-
ously assessed for personal property with assessed valuation of
$9,060. This assessment< was processed in an incorrect' tai:' area
code and should be cancelled. A new assessment has been, levied
in the 'correct tax area code.
Cade 53002 - Assessment Iia. 2010., Robert ', McGlune and
'
Wayne nther are erroneously assessed for pose ssory interest in
land with a valuation of $670, since the lease was terminated by
States Land Coamaission prior to the lien dated Therefore, this
assessment 'should be cancelled.
<wr....r
ea tan, ss s "ant '_ ssessor
July 28, 1970
- Page , of
RESOLUTION NO, 70/466
Code ' - �ssesament Not �'�?�#9� Nick' GZ+ ies and,
Louis A Janeyare errooeOns17 assessed Vo.r po ses aarg �t+e +ds�
in i and with as,36 sed V cation r�� � ansa 3.mprOvMents of *90
and not assessed vs ,ue exert �sr nested reeide �� with3 a
six months of the lien date:. flu month t - onth. reta' l Po $eeSorg
interest is icon sIdered to be of n. bolus if Qo"'up eg �erm�t�ate
lass thin six months of ter t 3 lie'a dates :or prl er toAtmst 31
1970. Terminatibn of adou. an Iey meter assessment has been meds and
within six months of the 1 .ext date. aoe stiuutes an c�p�n�oz Pf no
value, Therefore, in speord oe with> a.ssessor�S:
�x this
assessment should, be cancelled.
I here+ z nt to the
oc�rroetions and ehanxes in
the :above re,solutiens'*
By I d,4
b �#�&t�t3 ,� ss s int 1#sse�ser <��eptxt�
ul P-8, 1970
Adapted by the Board this 128th day of Xuly, 1970.
RESOLUTION vo3 70/466
'age of