Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESOLUTIONS - 08042003 - 70-417 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Changes } of the Assessment Roll } RESOLUTION NO. 70/417 of Contra Costa County } } WHEREAS, the County Assessor having filed with this Board requests for correction of erroneous assessments, said requests having been consented to by the District Attorney; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County Auditor is authorised to correct the following assessments: For the Fiscal Year =*-XXZMX 1970-71 It has been ascertained from the assessment roll and from papers in the assessor's office what was intendedand what should have been assessed; and, therefore, pursuant to Revenue and Taxa-- tion Code 4831, the following defects in description and/or form and clerical errors of the assessor on the roll should be eor- rooted: Code 08001 - Assessment 3431, SafewayStores, Inc. is erroneously assessed for personal property with a valuation of $209,970 and improvements of *1,0866,390, less business inventory exemption of *1 .,040, due to assessor's error_ in. duplicating the assessing of leasehold improvements reported by a.ssessee. They were partially doubler assessed as Fixed. Machinery and the balance of them was included in the Cost Estimate by Appraisal Section. Therefore, the assessment should be corrected to $209,970 9'70 perso al property and 4'1,065,910 improvements, less business inventory exemption of 14-040. R. 0. Seatons Ass stent Assessor July 141 1970 cc Assessor (G. Giese) Auditor `fax Collector Page 1 of�� RESOLUTION NO. 70/417 It has been _ascertained by the assessor from an audit of the as sessee r s books of account or ether papers that therehas been a defect of descriptionor clerical error of the assesses in his property statement or in other information or records furnished to the assessor which caused the assessor to assess personal property which should not have been assessed or :to assess it at a substan- ti.ally >higher valuation than: he would have entered on the roll> if the information had been correctly furnished; and therefore, pur- suant to the Revenue and Taxation Code, Seoti.on 46 1. , the assessor certifies to the auditor' that the fallowing correction should be made on the assessment roll. Code 06008 -- Assessment No, 2006, Tomkel, Ine, is errone- ously assessed for personal property with a valuation. of$3,190 and improvements for $$,#690,' less business inventory exemption of : 57 since the assessee inoorrectly reported supplies and inventory. Therefore, this assessment should be corrected to show personal- property ersonalproperty with a valuation of $2j.000 and improvements of t5,690, with business inventory `'exemption zero. It has been ascertained from the 'assessment roll and from records in the assessor's office that taxes havebeen levi'ed ter charged erroneously or illegally;;for the reasonsas stated below; and,, theref©re, pursuant to the Revenue and Taxation Code, Section 4986 (l) (a'), the following uncollected tax, penalty" or costs heretofore or hereafter levied or charged, should''be ancelled in whole or in part on the 'following as Code 08024 - Assessment No, 2025, Ronald P. and. M. Patricia Jones are erroneously assessed for personal property with a 'valuation. of $210 plus 10 percent penalty for failure to file within the time required by law, less business inventory exemption. of .5. This assessment has been levied more than once, being a duplicate of ,assessment No.' 14002-2011; ,.therefore this assesent' should be cancelled, AND, URTHER$ under Section 4980 ' {1) (b) t Code 08001 - .assessment Xo. 3501, Keleket/CGR >Corporation is erroneously assessed for pereonal 'prop+ert with a valuation of $3$830 'less` business inventory exemption 'of 1 041, since they were no longer doing business in this county on the lien date. Therefore this assessment should' be cancelled. Code 08001 - Assessment No. 3567, King Hulsey is assessed for personal property with assessed valuation' of 50 plus 10 percent penalty` for failure to file within the time required by law. This is an erroneous assessment since the assessee had gone out of business before the lien -date. fit. 0. Nato�, Xseistant Asseaser July 14, 1970 RESOLUTION NO. 70/417 Page 2 of ... .. Code 12009 Assessment No. 2001, A. 0, Epps Construction Co. , Inc. is assessed for personal property. with assessed valuation of ;r>180< This Is an erroneous assessment' sinoe the assessee had gone out of business pr,Ior to the lien date and disposed of his property. Therefore this assessment ''should be cancelled, Code 6604 - Assessment No. 20431 S* 6, Zacher is errone- ously assessed for personal property with assessed valuation of $200 plus 10 percent penalty'' for failure to file within the time required by law, since the assesses had sold the property before the lien. date. Therefore, this assessment should be cancelled. Code 82038 - assessment No: 2.58, Merrill and Glendoraine Lynch are erroneously assessed for improvements with assessed valuation of $300. Due to clerical error they were listed as the owners of the improvementa; this assessment should be", cancelled;' an assessment is being levied to the 'correct owner. T hereby consent to the corrections and changes in the above resolutions. J01M B. CIAUSEN, County Counsel_ e By Deputy 71MCF, .ass stent Assessor July 14# 1970 Adopted by the Board this 14th day of July, 1970, RESOLUTION NO. 70/417' 'age, of ... ...