Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESOLUTIONS - 09171991 - 91-631 ' S �J THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Adopted this Resolution onSit. 17,1991 , by unanimous . : vote as follows: AYES: Supervisors Fanden, Schroder, McPeak, Torlakson and Powers NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None SUBJECT: Urgency Adoption of Revised ) RESOLUTION NO. 91/631 Fees for Land Development ) (Gov. Code, § 66017 ) Applications, Permits , ) Inspections , Plan Checking, ) Map Checking and Other ) Related Services ) } The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County resolves as follows : A. BACKGROUND, FINDINGS . 1 . The County of Contra Costa has conducted an extensive and exhaustive analysis of its services, the costs reasonably borne of providing those services, the beneficiaries of those services, and the revenues produced by those paying fees and charges for special services . 2 . The County wishes to comply with both the letter and the spirit of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution and limit the growth of taxes . 3 . The County desires to establish a policy of recovering the full costs reasonably borne of providing special services of a voluntary and limited nature, so that general taxes are not diverted from general services of a broad nature and used to unfairly and inequitably subsidize special services . 4 . Heretofore, the Board of Supervisors has adopted Ordinance No. 91-40 on August 12, 1991, establishing its policy on the recovery of costs , particularly, the percentage of costs reasonably borne from users of County services and directing staff as to the methodology for implementing said ordinance. 5 . By separate resolution, the Board of Supervisors has or will establish fees for land development applications , permits, inspections , plan checking, map checking and other related services , which fees ( "Development Fees " ) adhere to the policy of the Board of Supervisors , set forth in Ordinance No. 91-40, to recover that percentage of costs reasonably borne, as determined by the Board -in said Ordinance. Said fees primarily include fees 'to be charged to development projects (Gov. Code, §66000 ) ; therefore, pursuant to Government Code Section 66017 , shall not become effective until 60 days after passage of the aforementioned resolution. 6 . ' There is an urgent need for the protection of public health, welfare and safety for the immediate increase and establishment of the Development Fees . Similar fees currently in effect are in amounts which are less than necessary to meet the cost recovery requirements of Ordinance No . 91-40 . Therefore, special development services performed are being unfairly subsidized by the general fund. For each day that development services must be provided at rates which do not recover reasonably borne costs, there is an incremental and detrimental affect on the public health, welfare and safety, due to the diversion of funds from general services and programs needed for the public health, welfare and safety. RESOLUTION N0. 91/631 a B. URGENCY ADOPTION OF FEES . 1 . Fee Schedule Adoption. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66017 , the fees set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, are hereby adopted on an urgency interim basis, and shall be charged and collected for the services enumerated therein. 2 . Separate Fee for Each Process . All fees set by this resolution are for each identified process . Additional fees shall be required for each additional process or service that is requested or required. Where fees are indicated on a per unit of measurement basis, the fee is for each identified unit or portion thereof within the indicated ranges of such units . 3 . Added Fees and Refunds . Where additional fees must be charged and collected for completed staff work, or where a refund of excess deposited monies is due, and where such charge or refund is ten dollars ( $10 . 00 ) or less, a charge or refund need not be made, pursuant to the requirements of Government Code Sections 29373 . 1 and 29375 . 1 and amendments thereto provided said requirements are met . 4 . Defining and Timing of Fee Schedule. Definitions regarding and the timing of the implementation of the herein enumerated fee schedule shall be as set forth herein. 5 . Interpretation. This Resolution may be interpreted by the several County department heads in consultation with the County Administrator. If there is a conflict between two fees , the lower in dollar amount of the two shall be applied. 6 . Severability. If any portion of this resolution is declared invalid or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the Board of Supervisors hereby declares that it would have adopted the remainder of this Resolution regardless of the absence of the invalid part(s ) . 7 . Repealer. All resolutions and other actions of the Board of Supervisors in conflict with the contents of this Resolution are repealed to the extent of any conflict, during the operative dates of the conflicting provisions of this Resolution. Obligations existing under any resolution or other Board action repealed by this section shall not be affected, and shall remain in full force and effect. 8 . Effective and Expiration Dates . This resolution becomes effective immediately upon adoption on September 17 , 1991 and shall be operative for thirty ( 30 ) days (through October 17 , 1991 ) , pursuant to Government Code section 66017 . Orig. Dept: . County Administrator cc: Public Works County Counsel County Auditor-Controller Building Inspection ( here this Community Development an actNon taken nand anwo on athe correctnd the Northern California BIA Bowd of SupwAsm ft Oft dMWL Attn: . Guy S . B j erke ATTESTEM _, q 5 PHIL BATCH it.CM*of the Board of SupWWOM and Cowry►AdminNtinkm By Deputy LTF:ct ct2a:\urgency RESOLUTION 91/631