HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 09162008 - SD.3 TO: Board of Supervisors
Contra
__ -" Costa
FROM: Transportation, Water and Infrastructure Committee =-�, _.
(Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, Chair ," w".
DATE: August 18, 2008 County
SUBJECT: Action Plan Updates for Routes of Regional Significance
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATIONS
ACCEPT Report on the Action Plan Updates for Routes of Regional Significance,
AUTHORIZE the Chair to sign a letter to the Contra Costa Transportation Authority supporting a
workshop with the cities and the County on the Action Plan Updates (see Exhibit A); and
CONSIDER the need for additional discussion on Action Plan Updates as recommended by the . .
Transportation Water and Infrastructure Committee.
FISCAL IMPACT
None to the General Fund. Action Plans could affect the County's eligibility for Measure J
return-to-source revenue and Measure J Transportation for Livable Communities(TLC)grants if
the County adopts a General Plan Amendment that adversely affects a Regional Route without
the consent of a Regional Committee. These funds are used to maintain and improve
transportation facilities in the unincorporated area.
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: X YES
RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR mupdrvisor
OF BOARD COMMITTEE
APPROVE OTHER
/11
SIGNATURES : S perviso ale B. Uilkema N. Pie ho
ACTION OF BOARD APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED z ER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND
CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN AND
Xi UNANIMOUS (ABSENT ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD
AYES: NOES: OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN.
ABSENT: ABSTAIN:
ATTESTED
Contact: Steven Goetz (925/335-1240) DA D TWA, CLERK OF
cc: Department of Conservation & Development THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Public Works AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
, DEPUTY
G:\Transportation\Committees\TWIC\2008\Board Orders\action plan s.doc
Action Plan Updates for Routes of Regional Significance
August 18, 2008
Page 2
BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS
This report updates the Board on the status of the Action Plans Updates that are being
prepared by the Contra Costa Transportation Authority(Authority)and reviewed by the Regional
Transportation Planning Committees(Regional Committees).As you know,the Action Plans are.
a requirement of the Measure C/J Growth Management Program administered by the Authority.
The primary purpose of the Action Plans is to establish policies for managing the traffic impacts
from new development on regional routes. The policies consist of Multimodal Transportation
Service Objectives (MTSOs)which are quantifiable performance measures that include a target
date for attaining the objective. Each Action Plan contains actions for the participating
jurisdiction to implement to help attain the MTSOs by the specified target date. The Growth
Management Program requires the cities and the County to make good faith efforts to
implement the actions in the Action Plan in order to remain eligible for Return to Source funds
and to receive Measure J TLC grants.
In May, the Committee discussed the policy implications of the draft Action Plans currently
under.review. The primary finding was that the Action Plans were unable to identify a date for
attaining many of the proposed MTSOs. Year 2030 traffic volumes will inevitably result in a
deterioration of traffic conditions beyond the limits that have previously been established as
acceptable for many of our regional routes. County staff indicated that if these Action Plans are
adopted as currently proposed, it is likely that an amendment to the General Plan that is large
enough to trigger an evaluation of consistency with an Action Plan will become a Growth
Management Program compliance issue.
In June, Authority staff released a revised report on the ability of the Action Plans to attain their
MTSOs by 2030. This evaluation was based on revised travel forecasts that reflected the
combined impact of implementing all Action Plans, and the impact of constraining traffic
demand to available capacity at certain "gateway" locations. This new evaluation shows an
improved ability of the draft Action Plans to meet their MTSOs. This evaluation is based on
revised travel forecasts which are currently under review by various Technical Advisory
Committees (TACs). Questions raised by local jurisdictions about the validity of the travel
forecasts have not been fully answered at this time. The following is a summary of the status of
each Action Plan along with some concluding remarks.
West Contra Costa Transportation Committee (WCCTAC) Action Plan
The 2030 travel forecasts show that the MTSOs will be met on all regional routes except for
the following circumstances.
Location MTSO Pk Hr 2030 Condition
San Pablo Avenue/Appian LOS E AM LOS F
Appian Way/Tara Hills LOS D AM LOS E
San Pablo Ave/John Muir Pkwy LOS E PM LOS F
San Pablo Ave/Appian LOS E PM LOS F
Appian Way/1-80 WB Rams LOS D PM LOS F
Appian Way/Fitzgerald Dr LOS D PM LOS E.
SP Dam Rd/1-80 EB Rams LOS E PM LOS F
Richmond Parkway/Parr Blvd* LOS D PM LOS E
HOV Lane Usage on 1-80 Increase 10% Decreases 2- 4%
*= location is in unincorporated area
I
Action Plan Updates for Routes of Regional Significance
August 18, 2008
Page 3
BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS (Continued)
The Authority's Implementation Guide to the Growth Management Program calls for an MTSO to
have a target date for achievement. County staff has strived to work with the TAC to establish
MTSOs and actions that would be consistent with this guidance. Authority staff has modified their
model to limit forecasted growth in travel demand to the available capacity on the Bay Bridge. This
modification helped to reduce forecasted 2030 traffic demand to more realistic levels.
To meet the Authority's schedule for adoption of a Countywide Transportation Plan in April
2009, the WCCTAC TAC has elected to defer additional planning to resolve these MTSO
exceedances to a later date. WCCTAC proposes to review this 2nd draft of the Action Plan
Update no earlier than September.
GPA studies now underway for North Richmond and for EI Sobrante will need to comply with
this Action Plan Update if the GPA's environmental review begins after the Action Plan Update
is adopted by the Authority, which is anticipated in April 2009. The implications of the Action
Plan Update on these GPAs are as follows:
• The North Richmond GPA will increase traffic volumes on Richmond Parkway,
worsening congestion at Richmond Parkway/Parr Blvd intersection and potentially
causing an exceedance of the MTSO at Richmond Parkway/San Pablo Avenue
intersection. The County will need to provide a proposal to address any MTSO
exceedance that would be acceptable to WCCTAC. If the County approves the GPA
without the consent of WCCTAC we could risk becoming ineligible for our Return to
Source funds and the Measure J TLC funds.
• The EI Sobrante GPA proposes to remove policies that support the SP Dam Road
couplet and widening Appian Way to 4 lanes in EI Sobrante. These GPA proposals have
been incorporated into the Action Plan Update. Future land use in the GPA is less than
what is allowed by our existing General Plan, so adoption of the GPA by the County
should not adversely affect the ability to achieve the proposed MTSOs.
TRANSPLAN East County Action Plan
In the initial draft, there was a significant worsening of congestion on State Route 4, Vasco
Road and Byron Highway by 2030. Excessive congestion on State Route 4 was largely resolved
in the second draft through imposition of"gateway constraints" on Regional Routes that were
based on physical or political considerations. These gateways have not been sufficiently
evaluated to determine if their application can be defended in environmental studies.A potential
consequence is. that local jurisdictions reviewing development applications may end up
preparing one traffic study to comply with the Authority's Growth Management Program and a
separate traffic study to comply with their obligations under the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA) and state planning regulations.
The second draft still cannot identify an attainment date for the MTSO on Vasco Road, and the
Authority's travel forecast model has limited sensitivity to potential traffic growth on Byron
Highway at the county line. This update provides little information on the nature of the impacts
of year 2030 growth on Vasco Road and Byron Highway.
Location MTSO Pk Hr 2030 Condition
Vasco Road LOS E AM Southbound LOS F
PM Northbound LOS F
Action Plan Updates for Routes of Regional Significance
August 18, 2008
Page 4
BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS (Continued)
At their August 14th meeting, TRANSPLAN took the following actions:
• Approved release of the 2nd Draft Action Plan Update;
• Expressed a desire to widen Vasco Road to four lanes, but not to include it as part of this draft;
• Invited the TVTC to form a task force with TRANSPLAN to discuss long-range upgrades to
Vasco Road; and
• Requested staff to report on a cost and schedule to upgrade the CCTA travel demand
model to adequately evaluate SR 239 and Vasco Road improvements.
The County's Cecchini GPA study is underway and could be affected by this Action Plan Update if
it is adopted by the Authority in its current form. The Cecchini GPA is likely to increase traffic
volumes on Byron Highway and Vasco Road, worsening congestion and adversely affecting the
ability to achieve the MTSOs established for these two roads. The County will need to provide a
proposal to address any MTSO exceedance that would be acceptable-to TRANSPLAN. If the
County approves the GPA without the consent of TRANSPLAN,the County would risk becoming
ineligible for our Return to Source funds and the Measure J TLC funds.
Lamorinda Action Plan
The Lamorinda Action Plan has been released for comment.The Lamorinda area-has three regional
routes. 2030 travel forecasts indicate that all MTSOs for these routes will be exceeded in 2030:
Location MTSO 2030
Condition
SR-24 Maintain a delay index of 2.0 or AM: 3.5
Caldecott Tunnel to 1 680 better during peak period/peak PM: 4.8
direction (including freeway on-
ramps) 2.5 after 2030
Pleasant Hill Road Maintain a delay index of 2.0 or AM: 5.3
Taylor Road to SR-24 better during peak period/peak PM: 4.0
direction
Camino Pablo/San Pablo Maintain a delay index of 2.0 or AM: 2.1
Dam Road better during peak period/peak PM: 1.6
1-80 to SR-24 direction
Any activity requiring a GPA is likely to worsen these exceedances. Be aware that the 2030
travel forecasts have been constrained at the following "gateway" locations based on technical
and policy considerations:
• State Route 24 (SR24) at the Caldecott Tunnel;
• Westbound direction of SR24 at the 1-680 interchange; and
• Southbound Pleasant Hill Road (location to be determined)
Questions remain on whether these modeling methodologies are appropriate for CEQA
requirements. However,there is very little unincorporated territory in the Lamorinda area so it is
very unlikely that any County project would need to demonstrate compliance with the Lamorinda
Action Plan. The Southwest Area Transportation (SWAT) Committee will be reviewing this
Action Plan Update at their September meeting.
Action Plan Updates for Routes of Regional Significance
August 18, 2008
Page 5
BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS (Continued)
Tri Valley Transportation Plan/Action Plan
During the review of the initial draft,the Tri Valley Transportation Council(MC)accommodated the
County by deleting the intersection project at Danville Boulevard and Stone Valley Road, and
making numerous wording changes and technical corrections as outlined in the County's two
comment letters to TVTC.The TVTC did not accommodate the request of the County, San Ramon
and Danville to consider expansion of Vasco Road to four lanes for its entire length in both counties.
The Action Plan will continue to keep Vasco Road as a two-lane road in Alameda County.
The MTSOs and the designated Regional Routes remain the same as in the adopted Action
Plan. Year 2030 traffic forecasts show some exceedances of MTSOs.
Location MTSO Pk Hr 2030 Condition
1-680 Delay AM Northbound Delay Index 2.2
'Index PM Northbound Delay Index 2.6
2.0
Signalized LOS D AM 16 out of 57 intersections (28% of total)
Intersections will exceed MTSO
PM 29 our of 57.intersections (51% of total)
will exceed MTSO
Potentially, MTSO exceedances could complicate the County's review of the New Farms GPA
study now underway. The Action Plan Update continues the current TVTC policy that any GPA
generating 500 or more peak hour trips will need to demonstrate to the Regional Committee that
approving the GPA will not adversely affect the ability to achieve MTSOs. If the New Farms study
generates 500 or more peak hour trips, it will need to provide a proposal to address any MTSO
exceedance that would be acceptable to the SWAT Committee. If the County approves the GPA
without the consent of the SWAT Committee, the County would risk becoming ineligible.for our
Return to Source funds and the Measure J TLC funds.
TRANSPAC Central County Action Plan
All member jurisdictions were unanimous in:
• their concern over the cumbersome and backward process used by the Authority to
update the Action Plan;
• the desire to discontinue the use of MTSOs or else greatly simplify them; and
• their request to increase the threshold size for GPAs to 500 peak hourtrips before Action
Plan policies would apply.
TRANSPAC included all of these items in its recent action to approve the Action Plan without
MTSOs and to leave the MTSO issue for further discussion with the Authority over the next 18
months. The Action Plan was approved on July 24 for public review and comment. Pending
resolution of the MTSO issue with the Authority, TRANSPAC's proposal helps minimize
potential complications with the County's planning process for GPA studies.
Concluding Comments.
As stated previously, the primary purpose of the Action Plans is to cooperatively establish
policies for managing the traffic impacts from new development on regional routes. The Action
Plan Updates, in their current state, vary in the success at fulfilling this purpose.
Action Plan Updates for Routes of Regional Significance
August 18, 2008
Page.6
BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS (Continued)
• The West County Action Plan Update has been most successful at meeting its purpose.
Historically, West County jurisdictions have been flexible in their use of the Action Plan.
Their focus has been on taking united actions that address traffic congestion. Their
transportation environment that is not as complex as other parts of the County, so they have
been able to prepare an Action Plan update that generally enhances local planning efforts.
• The update of the Tri Valley Action Plan has not resulted in any significant new action to
address substantial increases in congestion forecasts for 2030. This Action Plan will only
affect GPAs that generate 500+ peak hour trips, so its relevance to County development
applications is likely to be very limited in view of the County's Urban Limit Line policy.
• The update of the Lamorinda Action Plan has not resulted in any significant new actions to
address substantial increases in congestion forecasted for 2030. It proposes to establish
gateway constraints based primarily on policy rather than technical considerations,
potentially reducing the usefulness of its traffic studies. There is little unincorporated territory
in Lamorinda, so this Action Plan's relevance to County development applications is.also
limited.
• The update of the East County Action Plan has probably been the least successful in
accomplishing its purpose. To comply with the Authority's Growth Management Program
most technical resources were spent on pursuing the moving target of MTSO compliance by
reviewing and adjusting the travel demand model until the desired statistics were produced.
This effort provided no benefit to anyone, least of all the traveling public. TRANSPLAN has
recently taken action to further cooperative planning on Vasco Road and Byron Highway
issues.
• The Central County Action Plan accomplished its purpose in spite of the requirements of the
Growth Management Program. After navigating the very tedious update process
TRANSPAC decided to disregard the MTSO requirement and focus its efforts on developing
new actions to address regional transportation issues.
Action Plans as currently defined by the Authority, may have outlived their relevance. At the
time they were initially prepared in the early 1990's, long range travel forecasts (Year 2010)
could be accommodated by proposed increases in highway capacity. Now,the environment for
growth is different. Long range travel forecasts (Year 2030) show growth in traffic well beyond
the earlier 2010 forecasts, and there are fewer transportation projects planned that will
significantly increase the capacity of regional routes. The Growth Management Program's
emphasis on traffic congestion appears to be generating conflicts with other planning goals
.such as community preservation, redevelopment, and support of the Urban Limit Line policy.
The Committee supports the proposal of the Authority's Executive Director to hold a workshop
with the cities and the County to review the Action Plan Update issues raised by the
TRANSPAC jurisdictions and the County. The Committee recommends that the Board send a
letter to the Authority supporting the workshop and identifying the issues we would like to see
discussed. A draft of such a letter is enclosed as Exhibit A. For next steps, the Committee
intends to forward the individual Action Plan Updates as they are completed for Board approval.
The Board of Supervisors Contra David Twa
County Administration Building Costa Clerk of the Board
651 Pine Street. Room 106 and
Martinez,Calil'ornia 94553 County Counl\,Administrator
19"_'51335-1900
John Gioia, I"District --l" A
Gayle B.Uilkenia,2 District
Mar% N.Piepho.3rd Disn-ict
Susan A.Bonilla,4"'District
Federal D.Glover,5"'District
September 16, 2008
Honorable Dave Hudson., Chair
Contra Costa Transportation Authority
3478 Buskirk Avenue, Suite 100
Pleasant Hill, CA 94523
Honorable Chair Hudson..
On September 16, 2008, the Board of Supervisors authorized me to sign this letter of comment on the Action
Plan Updates that are being prepared by the Contra Costa Transportation Authority as part of the Measure J
Growth Management Program. The letter was prepared following discussion by the Board of a variety of
issues emerging from the Action Plan Update process. It is our understanding that the Authority is
considering sponsoring a workshop on the Action Plan Updates to address concerns raised by the
representatives of the County and others. The Board of Supervisors supports such a workshop and requests it
include discussion of the following issues:
• Ensure Action Plan requirements for traffic studies are consistent with the requirements of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA.) that local jurisdictions must follow in their review of the potential
traffic impacts from development projects. Concerns have been raised regarding the application of
"gateway constraints" in the travel forecasts prepared for Regional Routes. The application of this
methodology needs to be sufficiently evaluated to determine if its use can be defended in environmental
studies. Without consistent requirements, local jurisdictions may end up preparing one traffic study to
comply with the Authority's Growth Management Program and another traffic study to comply with their
obligations under CEQA and local planning regulations.
• Ensure that the Action Plan requirements provide sufficient flexibility for local jurisdictions to balance
the goals of minimizing traffic congestion on Regional Routes with other planning goals such as
community preservation, redevelopment, and support of the urban limit line policies. The long range
travel forecasts for year 2030 show growth in traffic volumes on regional routes well beyond the forecasts
used in earlier Action Plans, and there are fewer transportation projects planned that will significantly
increase the capacity on these regional routes. In some communities, further efforts to reduce traffic
c
congestion would bring about unwanted road expansion projects. In other communities, further efforts to
reduce traffic congestion may conflict with policies to accommodate growth without expanding urban
limit lines or to reduce greenhouse -as emissions. The Authority's Groxvth Management Program should
encourage local jurisdictions to fairly and openly balance.competing planning objectives when evaluating
development projects without putting their eligibility for Measure J revenue at risk.
Action Plan Update Letter to the Contra Costa Transportation Authority
September 16, 2008
Page 2 of 2
The Board of Supervisors believes that Measure J. as approved by the voters provides the Authority «with
sufficient flexibility to address these issues. Solutions can be developed through careful review of the growth
management policies adopted by the Authority, rather than changes to Measure J itself. The Board of
Supervisors offer the County's cooperation in working Nvith your commissioners to ensure Measure J
provides not only effective growth management but also enhances and adds value to the planning efforts of
local jurisdictions.
Sincerely,
Fe eral D. Glover, Chair
Contra Costa County
Board of Supervisors
FDG\SG
G:`Trtinslxortation\.C'��nunittees`;]-W]C'21utS`,Board Ordcrs`•.action plan exhibit A.dcic