HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 08122008 - D.3 sE__L Contra
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
FROM: PUBLIC PROTECTION COMMITTEE Costa
e:r lilpt�
DATE: AUGUST 4;2008 oo= :c~ .
SrA�oU�� County
SUBJECT: PROPOSAL BY THE SHERIFF TO PARTICIPATE WITH STATE PAROLE TO
ADMINISTER AN IN-CUSTODY DRUG TREATMENT PROGRAM
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATION `
APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Sheriff-Coroner, or designee, to execute a contract, upon approval by the
County Administrator, with the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) to
provide low- and medium-security flexible jail bed space to the state to implement a joint in-custody drug
treatment program for state parolees, from the period beginning with contract approval through June 30,
2011.
FISCAL IMPACT
As proposed, there will be no cost to the County to provide this program. The state will provide full
funding to establish and operate the Iri-Custody Drug Treatment Program (ICDTP). Funding for the ICDTP
has.been established through the State General Fund, facilitated by the stipulation in the federal district
court (Valdivia v. Schwarzenegger).
At full capacity, the program could generate up to $2.5 million annually, which will offset the program
administration and staff costs, with any remaining balance requested to be applied to immediate jail
improvements and needs,jail remodeling, security upgrades,and future jail expansion costs.
CONTINUED'ON ATTACHMENT: YES SIGNATURE:
-4
❑ RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ® RECOMMENDATION 6F BOARD COMMITTEE
® APPROVE ❑ OTHER
SIGNATURE(S):
ACTION OF BOARD ON
APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER ❑
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS: IHEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND
CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN AND
UNANIMOUS(ABSENT _) ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN.
AYES: NOES:
ABSENT: ABSTAIN:. ATTESTED: AUGUST 12,2008
Contact: MICHAEL NEWMAN (510)2624225 JOHN CULLEN, CLERK OF THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
cc: SHERIFF-CORONER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR:
HEALTH SERVICES DIRECTOR
By: puty
Proposal for In-Custody Drug Treat Program in Contra Costa County August 4,2008
Page 2
BACKGROUND
The 60-70%rate of recividism in the state and in this county is of grave concern. The Board of Supervisors
has previously expressed interest,in prevention programs to help curtail the staggeringly high recidivism
rate. To that end, the Office of the Sheriff has collaboratively sought out partnerships to develop and
implement new programs to help achieve this goal and positively impact the adult criminal justice system.
The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation(CDCR) is authorized to establish a substance
abuse treatment control unit per sections 11560 and 11563 of the California Penal Code. Ina stipulation by
the federal district court in the Valdivia"vs. Schwarzenegger case, dated Apri13, 2007, the CDCR was
ordered to incrementally expand the In-Custody Drug Treatment Program'from 288 beds to 1,800 beds
statewide by April 1, 2008: To help expedite this expansion, CDCR wishes to contract with local
jurisdictions throughout the state for bed space. The Sheriff has developed a proposal to take advantage of
the State's need for jail beds.
On April 22, 2008, the Board referred to the Public Protection Committee a review of the Sheriff's
proposal. Our Committee met with the Sheriff and his staff on May 23, June 16, and August 4 to discuss
and gain a better understanding of the proposal and to consider concerns raised by the Health Services
Department with regard to the efficacy of the iCDTP and its potential impact on community-based drug
treatment bed capacity.
The In-Custody Drug Treatment Program (ICDTP) is a resource that assists in the CDCR's goal of reducing
recidivism, and also serves as.a remedial sanction in lieu of a return to custody for parolees who have
violated their conditions of parole. Placement into ICDTP is intended for parolees who have committed
violations as a result of drug- or alcohol--related dependency, and/or who have a need for a period of
confinement and treatment to get their substance abuse under control. The program serves a different
population than re-entry programs in that re-entry programs target state prisoners in the last 6-12 months of
their sentences, while the drug treatment:program targets parolees that are already living within Contra
Costa communities.
All placements in ICDTP are voluntary, must be approved by the Board of Parole Hearings (BPH) and in
accordance with criteria established by the Office of the Sheriff, and will not constitute a break in parole.
The parolee will remain eligible for discharge consideration per Penal Code(PC) Section 3001. The
ICDTP operates under Health and Safety Code sections 11561 (male), and 11563 (female), which allow the
BPH to place a person in an in-custody drug treatment program, in non-revoked status, for up to 90 days,
when there are reasonable grounds to believe that he or she is addicted or habituated, or in imminent danger
of being addicted or habituated to controlled substances or alcohol.
Of the parolee candidates offered this program in this county, priority consideration will first be given to
those having a resident address in,Contra Cost"a County. Additional benefits to the County may follow as
the program expands to the County inmate population, at no additional County cost. This program has
shown.promise in some cases by reducing the recidivism rate by 20%.
The Division of Adult Parole Operations (DAPO) in cooperation with the Division of Addiction and
1 California Department of Corrections
Proposal for In-Custody Drug Treat Program in Contra Costa County August 4,2008
Page 3
Recovery Services (DARS) manage and operate two ICDTP models: a jail-based and community-based
drug treatment programs. The state wily provide teachers to facilitate the instruction of the program, and a
facility-assigned State Parole Agent to supervise the parole program. The following program descriptions
further identify the phases of treatment for both models:
r
♦ Jail-Based ICDTP-Phase f is a 60-day, in-custody, cognitive behavioral, drug treatment phase that is
accomplished through contracts between county jails and DAPO. The Contra Costa County Office of
Education provides enhanced cognitive behavioral curriculum during this phase. Phase II is a 30-day
residential aftercare treatment phase provided by community-based organizations contracted through
the Substance Abuse Services Coordination Agencies (SASCA). Phase lII is 60-days of outpatient
treatment that consists of referrals to Alcoholics Anonymous(AA),Narcotics Anonymous (NA),
aftercare groups, etc. Parolees may,also continue in residential treatment for some or all of Phase III if
they agree to do so and funding is available.
♦ Community-Based ICDTP-.Phase I is a 90-day residential treatment phase provided by community-
based organizations contracted through the SASCA. Phase II is 60-days of outpatient treatment that
consists of referrals to AA,NA, aftercare`1groups, etc. Parolees may also continue in residential
treatment for some or all of Phase IFI if they agree to do so and funding is available.
The Sheriff proposes to implement the Jail-Based ICDTP. At our Committee meetings, the Health Services
Department raised concerns about the efficacy of the ICDTP curriculum versus individualized drug
treatment services. The ICDTP.curriculum is geared towards drug users with a criminal history. This
curriculum has been recommended by the state for this target population in an effort to break the cycle of
criminal activity. Clinical drug treatment services are not a funded component of the ICDTP. The impact
of the program on available community-based'i treatment beds is unknown. However, the parolees being
served by the ICDTP are County residents and,part of the population to be served by community-based
treatment programs. As the ICDTP is a state-administered program,participants may be routed out of
Contra Costa County to receive community-based drug treatment services if no capacity exists within our
county.
Our Committee supports the Sheriff's proposal and recommends approval. The County Administrator's
Office is working with the Office of the Sheriff and County Risk Management to evaluate the state's
proposed contract language and request'modifications, if warranted.
u
Requested Action of the Committee
In Custody Drug Treatment Program , ---
Contra Costa County
The office of the Sheriff requests that the Committee support,approve and move
forward the partnership with the Department of Rehabilitation by authorizing the
Sheriff-Coroner,or his designee,to enter into contract with the California Department
of Corrections Rehabilitation.The purpose of this contract would be to provide excess
low and medium-security jail bed space to the state,to create a joint rehabilitation
A collaborative partnership to shift the way we', program for both State and County inmates at no additional cost to the Count.
:
manage non-violent felony inmates This contract will allow-authorize the Sheriff to provide ninety beds of secure housing
for qualifying ICDTP parolees for up to 60 days.Of the Parolee candidates that qualify
and are offered this program,priority consideration will first be aiven to those havina a
s, �t resident address in Contra Costa County.of the beds provided,sixty beds will be for -
Warren E. Rupf,Sheriff males and thirty beds will be for females.Additionally,current county inmates will be
By:Captain Michael F.Newman allowed to access this program.
Custody Seryioes Bureau
What is an
In Custody Drug Treatment Program
(ICDTP) :Current County.Participants-Secure Housing
The ICDTP operates under Health and Safety Code Sectlons'�11561(male),and ■ Orange County 128 beds
11563(female).These sections allow the Prson Board(BPH)to place a person
into an in-custody drug treatment program,in non-revoked status,for up to 90 - Kern County 128 beds
days,when there are reasonable grounds to believe that he or she is addicted • ty
or habituated, or in imminent danger of being addicted 6 or habituated to Santa Clara County 100 beds
controlled substances or alcohol. - ■
Jail-Based ICDTP ■ Tulare County 100 beds
Phase I is a 60-day,in-custody,cognitive behavioral,drug treatment phase that Merced Coun 50 beds
is comprised of an intensive classroom curriculum,[aught 5 days a weekifor 6 • ty
hours a day.This rmm is accomplished through specific contracts between
county Ials,me State and me Contra Costa County Office of Education,who ■ Chula Vista- 36 beds
provides enhanced cognitive behavioral curriculum during thislphase.
Phase II is a 30-day community bed(non-secure)placement pmgram. ■ Del Norte County 30 beds
How does it work? x
Why Participatel Provide Security
,Supervision and
::i Inmate ction Criteria Bed Space
Improved efficiency capability of current jail system opl;rations at ySele
,multiple r .,,o,c."nr
facilities '
To v,oynM Facflly
Zero cost to County,program is funded by the State,via daily jail inmate rate - Outcome;
More economical use of existing available low-medium tied space, potential Improved Public
modest revenue source » .,, Safety,Decreased
Recidivism
Potential to decrease the recidivism rate in Contra Costa County
Potential reduction impact on the long term county jail popultltion
Contra Costa currently has 150 community based beds(non..secure housing)for
drug treatment programs contracted to the state Provide Core
Classroom
A current snap shot of the county jail population-2088,identified that'Y581 of Education Curriculum
those inmates were In custody for a drug and or alcohol"offense. (Based on
population information.April 2008,similar monthly averages are consistent)
Over 600 parolees per year are released to Contra Costa County from States
-
institutions annually-all Crimes �
Yipoe w alWramptettenctttietnsustoQyptiasegaps p! tiarar4�, ,
- ..,,,,,, _aonenuottytw°sed ph.e (aa§l!s°t°eigbtl bytl�et+arokA „y„�,�,._
u, County IMPACT m' Local IMPACT
w_____ • The program site locations being offered are current medium and minimum
The ICDTP program should ire viewed as being an add on type program,with custody facilities operated by the Sheriffs Office.Both are secure jail facilities
the curtent Tail systems operation remaining static whether or not mis program and are operated in a legally correct,constitutionally sound and safe manner.
is initialed.Therefore,the additional impact of this program,both fiscally and Both have specific criteria for placement at each site and this criteria will not
operationally will be minimum,with some impact being absorbed change with the addition of this program. '
Staffing Communities or cities near the location of the custody facilities:
The program will require Tfxee Additional Deoury Shedf(s arKl require minimal but came
manager nt-administravve duties.Two at MCDF,one at yal'Funding source revenues West County Detention Facility WCDF;
e ei ed.
City of Richmond,Parchester Village
Facility 11
Both site l—b—have iderrofied rhe required space for secured housing,dassroan Marsh Creek Detention Facility MCDF;
insmictim space and office space for are Porde Agent and three teachers Cities of Clayton and Concord,Unincorporated Clayton
Food,dolling and
maintenance per individual inmate.Funding source revenues received.
These cities and communities will not experience any additional impact,risk or
Operations - safety concerns placed upon them as a result of this program.Ultimately,the
Transporranm,rarone medical care,inmate management/mi errision.Funding source programs sums may improve public safety,in these and other cities,by
revenues received. reducing the re-offender rate of those released on parole back to Contra Costa
county,(currently at over 600 parolees per year).
I.
Cost Impact Potential Revenue Impact '
Staffing
Three Deputy sheriffs 0 a maximum cost per year$183,949 ,$551,847 The State has identified and negotiated a daily jail rate with
Management Administrative costs absorbed.
participating Counties of$77.17 per inmate per day.
. Facility
Programming costs/space and instruction $00 Total daily jail rate per inmate $77.17
thin
Food,clog and maintenance per individual inmate per day $6.40
For Ninety inmates per day $576.00 Total potential revenue per day(90 inmates) $6,945
Total potential revenue per month(90 inmates) $215,295
Operations Total potential revenue per year(90 inmates) $2,535,034
Transportation costs will be absorbed as routine b-evd curraitly
occurs between fadlibes and is one way only $00
Routine medical care daily rate per inmate(actual 07/08) $27.00 -
inmate management/supervision/Oversight(see stuffing above) $00
Total Potential Cost Impact Per Year _$1,649,(:37•
Total Potential Cost Per Month _$137,4191
Total Potential Cost Per Day _$4,432
` Incremental Cost Analysis Detail ' Incremental Cost Analysis Continued
4: p,y„MMr.n viatxs M).alorol Feoa Srriv e
2350 FOOD
(Includes all nutriments&beverages for human consumption)
AVERAGE DAILY POPULATION(ADP) 52085 000 = S 1 318 79 = $3.61 Food Cost Per Inmate Day
1,581 365
April 1449. Dec 1582 Sept. 1618
Feb. 1514 Nov. 1662 Aug. 1610 2160 CLOTHING
Jan. 1564 Oct. 1613 July 1618 (Includes all clothing,personal supplies,uniforms,foot-ware,etc.)
S531,864= S 336.4 =$0.92 Clothing Cost Per Inmate Day
14230 1581 365
9(mo.) = 1581 ADP
2170 HOUSEHOLD EXPENSES
(Includes all bedding,launbry,and general household supplies.Mattresses,cleaning supplies,
FORMULA USED FOR COMPUTAIONS talet tissue,tleterger><s,garbage disposal,etc.)
A�Budaet 4=Armual COst Per Inmat2=Cost Per Inmate Day S 1 36 974 =$-�3,1g_ _ $1.87 Household Expense Cott Per Inma6e Day
ADP 365 days
` TOTAL INCREMENTAL COST:
Food $3.61
Clothing $.92
Household$1.87
Total S 6.40-Per Inmate Per Day
I
Labor Detail Analysis „ Cost Vs. Revenue Chart
Labor Costs
Includes costs for 3 deputy,sheriff's, all other labor costs remain
unchanged, i.e. cooks, detention service workers (D5W), clerical,
require NO additional staffing rct �
Annual cost for 1 deputy sheriff including benefits,:$183,949.38
Labor cost per day$1,511.90
Projected Revenues j
$77.17,daily per inmate
$3,472.65,daily per 45 inmates N
$6,945.30,daily per 90 inmates o
. .Cost Analysis Conclusion Indirect Revenue Benefit
The Inmate Welfare Fund (IWF-established by the Penal Code)assists to
Projecting a fill ratio of approximately 25 state parolees(less than 1/3 provide funding to inmate programs, educational programs, training and
of the proposed contracted beds)the program Operates at Zero cost. vocational training to inmates in the jail system. Inmates that utilize the
Of the current contracted beds in the seven other counties the bed fill - commissary service and inmate telephone service assist in generating modest
ratio has been approximately 90%. revenue for the]WF fund.On average,this equals$100 and$130,respectively
a month.
Above the fill ratio Of approximately 25 beds, the program can Both facilities will allow the program inmates to participate in the purchasing of
generate a positive/modest revenue stream. - commissary and the access to telephones.This could potentially bring in
$15,000 to$20,700 directy to the IWF fund,which would be used in the county
jail system to pay for additional or the expansion of current programs,education
and training for the countyjail inmate population.
Discussion Points
F:
Questions Worth Discussion ■ Attachments 1-10
What happens if it cost money to operate the program?
what happens if the State runs out of money?
What happens if the jail population expands and we need the bed space?
What happens if we dont receive payment?
What happens if we dont want to participate anymore?
What do we really gain from participating?
Are we liable for anything? „
Can we refuse acceptance of someone the send us?
. Questions?
' 3
OFFICE OF THE SHERIFF _ Warren E. Rupf
Contra Costa County. ti Sheriff
Custody Services Bureau
5555 Giant Highwayr�coax '
Richmond, CA 94806 f
(510) 262-4225 Fax (510)262-4299
Date: July 14, 20.08,
To: Julie Enea, Senior Deputy County Administra or
From: . Joseph P. Caruso, Commander CS
By: Michael F. Newman, Captain CSB
Subject:. Community Outreach Report- In Custody Drug Treatment Program
On June 16, 2008, the Public Protection Committee requested the Sheriff to conduct community
outreach with selected-area leaders. This outreach was in regards to the introduction of an In
Custody.Drug Treatment P.rograrn Partnership with the State of California and the County Office
of Education.
The outreach information was well received and as a result, only, one further inquiry was
recorded. That inquiry`came from the iBrentwood Police Department. After contacting the agency
they were in strong support of the described program.
No other inquiries, expressed concern, opposition or additional information has been requested
of this office regarding this program.
"Professionalism,Security and Service"
(7/7/2008 Mike Newman -20080702193527247.pdf Page 1
i
County of Contra Costa
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
MEMORANDUM
DATE: JULY 2,2008
TO: WFIRREN E.RUPF,Sheriff-Coroner
Attn: Joseph Caruso,Commander,Custody Services Bureau
FROM: PUBLIMPRO1 ECTION COMMITTEE(Supervisors Gioia and Glover)
By IRENEA,Senior Deputy.County Administrator
SUBJECT: CO UNITY OUTREACH ON THE SHERIFF'S PROPOSAL TO
IMP EMENT AN IN-CUSTODY DRUG ABUSE TREATMENT PROGRAM
At the June 16 Public Protection Committee meeting'the Sheriff agreed to conduct community
outreach by meeting with the leaders of the cities of Antioch,Oakley,and Brentwood,and those'
West County communities in the vicinity of the West County Detention Facility,and provide a
report summarizing those outreach efforts at the Committee's next meeting on July 21. The
goals of the outreach effort are to advise the local communities of the proposed program and why
the program is needed,and.to distinguish the program from the re-entry proposal that was
previously rejected by the Board of Supervisors.
Please provide your written outreach report to me no later than July 14 for.inclusion in the
Committee meeting packeu.
Jul. 15. 2006 . 4.49PM ,Sup.' Susan Bonilla 925-646-5202 , No. 362 --7P 2
�''0 eb b
p
N O 4y W Oji `;i y_
IV tz I �p
rn "rn is { •w t ^ T'� p .
j{{] to I:1. ' » 1
r1.. J fu .C1• eY .j.{'.yyN.jj CP }..�.�-P � �4 � CR Q+ Ht � VJ ("i � �+��•�� 'Y,' hi•
.F-.•„ r1 M n..: • O � •�-. "C r�
c9
o'.a ' S. F3 Cs 63• p- rte ". Ct
'R�-o'
' .ro5`:5 w $ C n "d
.•r E:°•% � �• rte..tD .."'i -,
g' L �4- 0 �. . � '.w
9- 0
••L2.' � !"�-.� :CL„. �Y .a-d n, s'p a,•�i. is ':•t• r t� 'K ;� !e ri• '' +�' .+.7
,! ,. d' g.
, 'sT. '�''te•���C„,.C�D {b{b• _..:
Mt'
Ir.
jib
n Chia
o N
eA
is
' o g far o t5
13AD
14 40
fo
'C."tis rot q p .a W ba .'
. •'i .R"� fin” � � O� 'sawo
a � � t�i-`"' � � �• `#o - •�.
12.
meq , Qt rpa �
IL
In
- � •7�. Lam' � � CqT' ry �'. � p G� O rn �^ !f-i�
o. �. � "t! t5. ��. � � AAo GbGi �"t cry ,�`�� � � "ter L2• _
Q r w
EL
Vlt% PIN
. r
HAVEN FEARN CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
F
DIRECTORALCOHOL AND OTHER
DRUG SERVICES
597 Center Ave: Suite 320
C O NT RA CO S TA Martinez, CA 94553
Ph (925) 313-6350
H E A. L T' H SERVICES Fax.(925) 313-6307
Date: August 4,2008
To: Contra Costa County Public Protection Committee
John Gioia, Supervisor District,l Federal Glover,Supervisor District 5
Chair, CCC Public.Protection Committee Member, CCC Public Protection Committee
11780 San Pablo Avenue, #D '" 315 E. Leland Road
El Cerrito, CA 94530 Pittsburg, CA 94565
From: Haven Fearn,Director,Alcohol&Other Drug Services
Re: Comments on the Office'of therSheriff s Proposal to Establish a Joint State-County In-Custody
Drug Abuse Treatment and Rehabilitation Program
}
The Alcohol and Other Drugs Servicesli Division (AODS) of the Health Services Department commends
and supports the Sheriff s"proposal forhighlighting the following concerns:
• The high rate of re-impri ;omne'nt for county,residents paroled from state prisons.
• The large contribution to re-imprisonment made by drug and alcohol abuse problems.
• The risks to community well being due to high drug and alcohol related recidivism.
AODS also supports the Sheriffs proposal to move toward solutions as follow:
• The commitment to rehabilitate county residents in the community whenever possible.
• The focus on alcohol and other}drug treatment as a key component of rehabilitation.
• The need to find solutions that are entirely state-funded with no net county costs.
AODS poses the following questions with respect to the Sheriff's proposal:
• For the first in-custody phase, is it anticipated that classes teaching alcohol and drug information
will produce outcomes (i.e. successes) that are comparable to treatment?
• For the last out-of-custody phase is it anticipated that referral to AA,NA, and other self-help will
produce outcomes'that are comparable to (outpatient) treatment?
• Since adopting "no one size fits all"improves outcomes (CSAC attachment, p.3, and CDCR's
DARS Division website),how will the classes do individualf,assessments, linkages with services
and placement in appropriate treatment programs upon release?
.Contra Costa Alcohol and Other Drug Services•Contra Costa Emergency Medical Services.Contra Costa Environmental Health.Contra Costa Health Plan.
Contra Costa Hazardous Materials•Contra Costa Mental Health.Contra Costa Public Health•Contra Costa Regional Medical Center•Contra Costa Health Centers
ill
Contra Costa County Public Protection Committee
Re: Comments on the Office of the Sheriff's Proposal
to Establish a Joint State-County In-Custody
Drug Abuse Treatment and Rehabilitation Program
July 21, 2008
Page 2
• For the out-of-custody please; will there be new state funds (e.g., through AB900 or through the
State's SASCA)to expand our i,community treatment slots and beds, or will this proposal
increase demand onexisting capacity(CSAC attachment, p.4)?
• If there is no new community treatment capacity, will parolees displace county residents in
existing slots and beds for financial reason, since community residents',treatment is paid for at a
county rate that is lower than the state parole rate?
• Further, if there is no new community treatment capacity,will county residents be less likely to
enter existing county-funded treatment for reasons of stigma and comfort, since treatment will
have to be re-designed to meet parole's security rules and requirements?.
Contra Costa Alcohol and Other Drug Services-Contra Costa Emergency Medical Services•Contra Costa Environmental Health'•Contra Costa Health Plan
Contra Costa Hazardous.Materials•Contra Costa Mental Health,-Contra Costa Public Health.Contra Costa Regional Medical Center Contra Costa Health Centers
'1
{44
Corrections Reform
County Policy Principles and Guidelines• Page 3
further investment in multiagency programs authorized under S6 6181, which
are built on proven, evidence-based strategies including.comprehensive pre-
sentence assessments, in-custody treatment, targeted case management,
and the development of an individualized life plan. These programs promote
a permanent shift in the way nonviolent felony offenders are managed,
treated and released into their respective communities. Examples of
program elements that have been demonstrated to improve offenders'
chances for a successful reintegration into.their communities upon release
from custody include, but are not limited to, the following,
Early risks and needs assessment that incorporates assessments of the
need for treatment of alcohol and other drug abuse, and the degree of
need for literacy, vocational and mental health services;
c In-custody treatment that is appropriate to each individual's needs —
no one-size-fits-all programming;
After care and relapse prevention services to maintain a "clean and
sober" lifestyle;
Strong linkages to treatment, vocational training, and support services
in the Community;
Prearranged housing and employment (or vocational training) for.
offenders before release into their communities of residence;
Preparation of the community and offenders' families to receive and
support each offender's new law-respecting and productive.lifestyle
before release through counseling and public education that recognize
and address the inter-generational impact and cycles of criminal
justice system involvement.
Long-term mentdrship and support from faith-based and other
community and cultural support organizations that will lash a lifetime,.
not just the duration of the parole period; and
Community-•based, treatment options and sanctions. ;
Counties believe that such,reentry programs should.include incentives for
inmate participation.
• Siting of new facilities: Counties acknowledge that placement of
correctional fadlities is controversial However, the state must be sensitive
to community,response to changing the use of, expanding, or siting new
correctional:faci{ities (prisons, community correctional facilities, or reentry
facilities). Counties and other affected municipalities must be involved as
active participants,in planning and decision-making processes regarding site
selection. Providing for security and appropriate mitigations to the local
community are essential
1 Chapter 603, Statutes of 2005.
California State Association of Counties
1100 K Sheet,Sulte 101-Sacramento,CA-95814
(916)327-7500•FAX:.(916) 441-SS07
Adopted November 30,2006 www.csaacounties.org
Corrections Reform
County Policy Principles and Guidelines• Page 4
Impact on focal treatiment capacity, Counties and the state must be aware of
the impact on local communities'existing treatment capacity (e.g., mental health,
drug treatment, vocational services, sex offender treatment) if the correction
reforms conternplate a major"new demand,'on services as part of development of
community correctional facilities, reentry programs, or other locally based
programs. Specialized treatment services that are not widely available are likely
the first to be overtaxecl. To prevent adverse impacts upon existing alcohol and
drug and mental health'treatment programs for primarily non-criminal justice
system participants, treatment capacity shall be increased to accommodate criminal
justice participants; In,addition, treatment capacity shall be separately developed
and funded.
Emerging and best practices. Counties.support the development and
implementation of a mechanism for collecting and sharing of best practices that can
help advance correction reform efforts.
California State Association of Counties
I100 X Street,Suite 101•Sacramento,CA•95814
(916)327-7500•FAX!(916) 441.5507
Adopted November 30,2006 - www.csa;c.countles.org
Neighborhood House 104 24
Diablo Valley Ranch 77 28
Ozanam Center 24 13
East County Center for Women 12 12
Pueblos del Sol 22 17
Wollam House 24 14
Ujima Rectory „ 12 10
Ujima La Casa 12 10
Ujima Corbin 6 6
Sunrise House -0- -0-
Discovery House 40 40
Total 333 176
a
fi
HAVEN FEARN " CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
DIRECTOR ALCOHOL AND OTHER
DRUG SERVICES
597. Center Ave. Suite 320
CONTRA COSTA Martinez, CA 94553
'-----_..-----.-.-----------.__._ Ph (925) 313-6350
HEALTH•
SERVICES Fax (925) 313-6307
July 7, 2008
Mr. Robert Garner, Director'
Santa Clara County
Department of Alcohol and Drug Services
976 Lenzen Avenue, 3rd Floor .
San Jose, 95126
Dear
The Contra Costa County Office of the`Sheriff has presented a proposal to the Board of
Supervisors calling for the establishment of a joint State/County in-'custody drug abuse treatment
and rehabilitation program. The]proposal references seven(7) California Counties in which the
Office of the Sheriff s model and design is currently operating successfully. Your county, Santa
Clara, is listed among the seven with a bed capacity of 100.
The Sheriffs proposal is a collaboration between several agencies including the California
Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR), the.Division of Adult Parole Operations
(DAPO), the Division of Addiction. arld Recovery` Services (DARS), and the Contra Costa
County Office of Education. The In-Custody Drug Treatment Program (ICDTP) is a jail-based
cognitive behavioral curriculum which is followed by, community-based follow-up 30 days
residential with a possibility for extended stay, and outpatient treatment (ODF) identified in the
proposal as "AA,NA, aftercare groups; etc."
The jail-based phase has a flexible bed space capacity, but projects a discharge rate of ninety
(90) individuals, sixty (60) men and thirty (30) women into the community-based ICDTP. The
purpose in my contacting you is to, request your assistance by providing us with any helpful
information that you and your local criminal justice authority might provide our County's Public
Protection Committee in our effort to minimize any adverse impact on local communities when
these inen and women are returned to the community.
A suggestion was made that our committee form a delegation or send representatives to visit
your county for direct observation of the programs, however, we have not been successful in that
effort, and the Board of Supervisors wants to bring this discussion to closure. Could you and
your partners in Criminal;Justice, provide me with a formal written reply to this request that I
might share with our Public Protection Committee and other member of the Board of Supervisors
Contra Costa Alcohol and Other Drug Services•,Contra Costa Emergency Medical Services•Contra Costa Environmental Health.,Contra Costa Health Plan
Contra Costa Hazardous Materials•Contra Costa Mental Health•Contra Costa Public Health.Contra Costa Regional Medical Center•Contra Costa Health Centers
' Ii
Mr. Robert Garner, Director
County of Santa Clara
Department'of Alcohol and Drug Services
July 7, 2008
Page 2
by July 14, 2008: That date is just prior to our next meeting and I would like each member of,the
Committee, and the Office of the Sheriff to have an opportunity to review: your information
before the meeting:
I appreciate your indulgence and apologize for the quick responses requested.
Sincerely,
Hav n Fe
Dire for
Contra Costa Alcohol and Other Drug Services•Contra'Costa Emergency Medical Services•Contra Costa Environmental Health•Contra Costa Health Plan
Contra Costa Hazardous Materials•Contra Costa Mental Health•Contra Costa Public Health•Contra Costa Regional Medical Center.Contra Costa Health Centers.
- . 1
Administration
SANTA CLARA 976 Lenzen Avenue
VALLEY San ose,California 95126
Dedicated to the Health ) 7e1. alifo 792-5680
of the Whole Community Fax.(408)947-8702
HEALTH 6 HOSPITAL SYSTEM
DEPARTMENT OF
ALCOHOL & DRUG SERVICES
July 14, 2008
Mr. Haven Fearn, Director
Contra Costa County
Alcohol and Other Drug Services
597 Center Avenue, Suite 320
Martinez, California 94553
Dear Mr. Fearn:
I am pleased to respond to your request for information about our local experience with the In-Custody Drug
Treatment Program(ICDTP), supported by the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR).
In Santa Clara County this involves our Department of Correction(DOC), which is separate from the Sheriffs
Department:
7
Our DOC does house the ICD I Rprogram, p'r'oviding jail housing for these state inmates. The program is taught
by'adult education out of San Mateo County.;' DOC provides only the housing and is not involved in the
curriculum or training for the Program.
After reading your letter, my first observationFis that there may be confusion regarding the content of the ICDTP
program. While it is called treatment, it is really educational in nature. And in fact, the state's in-custody
treatment has been viewed as being a majorjlailure. But I do believe the kind of educational program offered is
helpful, especially if there is a planned�transition to the community,with adequate support services available
upon re-entry. And it is the re-entry that is usually the problem.
I do not believe that CRDC provides any support for the substance abuse treatment or other support services in
the community that are really the key to successful reintegration. While the AA, NA and other similar aftercare
groups mentioned in the letter are, in fact, free and available in every community,they do not constitute
substance abuse treatment in any way, but are an adjunct and support to treatment And so, these inmates are
usually dumped onto an already overburdened and inadequately funded drug and alcohol treatment system in
the community.
Your letter also refers to.the plan to follow the jail-based phase with 30 days of follow-up residential treatment,
with a possibility for extended stay. First, the determination of the level of treatment is and must be a clinical
determination, made by certified substance abuse counselors using valid assessment tools. Second, unless
your County has excess treatment capacity, these new clients will either end up on a waiting list or bump other
clients from treatment What I believe is lacking is adequate state funding to`expand the treatment system to
accommodate these new clients. And without it, relapse and recidivism are likely.
In summary, while I strongly support in-custody services to help inmates with their myriad problems and prepare
them for re-entry, to invest in the in-custody services without investing in the!;community services falls short of
what is required for success.
Sincere ,
/Ro#bertner
Director
The Department of Alcohol&Drug Services is a division of the Santa Clara Valley Health&Hospital System.Owned and operated by the County of Santa Clara.
CCCOE Educational Opportunities CDC Page 1 of
„y duration
Attachment 1 �tii Pt. rams Contra Costa Count office of>K Student Programs&Services
Adult Correctional Education
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR)
Director, Lynn Mackey
925.942.5308
` Ima_cke ccc_ik12--ca.us
49
�, .
.-.
--Quick Links--
•
Comauterized Llteracy Learning Centers Substance Abuse Treatment&Recovery
Youth.Dev.Svcs. In Custody Drug Treatment Program I Parolee Substance Abuse Program
CDCR Contacts
Home Search
cwses jobs The Division of Adult Parole Operations(DAPO)of the California Department of
Corrections and Rehabilitation has collaborated with the Contra Costa County Office of
Education to develop educational programs designed to reduce the number of parolees
returning to prison. Classes are conducted at parole offices and jail facilities throughout
the state.
Computerized (Literacy Learning Centers
A series of Computerized Literacy Learning Center's has been implemented
in Parole Offices statewide offering adult basic education in reading,writing,
math,G,E.D., and resume writing. By offering curriculum and instruction via
computers,participants learn at their own pace and are offered lessons
tailored to meet their individual learning needs.
A CDCR.report','has shown a correlation between functional literacy and
employment.Today's employers require basic literacy skills that many
parolees do not have. More than half read below the sixth grade level and
about 70%of them are unemployed. Lack of literacy and employability skills
are primary barriers to parole success. Without gainful employment,today's
parolees are ata high risk of returning to prison.
The Parolee Education Program Computerized Literacy Learning Centers
offer parolees reading,writing and math lessons via computer-assisted
learningformat:An evaluation of the program after two years of operation
showed that parolees increased reading and math skills by an average of
two grade levels.
CDCR programs are located in parole offices throughout the state.
Substance Abuse Treatment and Recovery
The STAR(Substance Abuse Treatment and Recovery)program is a
curriculum-based educational program designed to�motivate parolee
substance abusers to participate in post-release recovery activities. New
skills are presented which help individuals understand the relapse process
and prepare for smooth,drug free community transition.
httn lhxnxnx� reec�P lrl? ra ne/etevro/oltAia/.-.1. 1,*„+1 "„”
CCCOE Educational Opportunities CDC Page 2 of.3
The core components of the STAR Curriculum address the Process of
Addiction,the Process of Recovery,Anger Management,and Community
Transition as well as other essential elements that,provide participants with
information designed to facilitate substance abuse,rrecovery. The
curriculum addresses denial and stimulates individual growth through active
participation.
The five-step process model of instruction is used to help parolees develop
a new understanding of their substance abuse problem.
The parolee is motivated to make lifestyle changes'.This educational path
facilitates disclosure and provides motivation. It also is designed to help
parolees understand the thoughts,feelings and events that trigger relapse.
Overall,the program helps them develop insight into core issues involved in
changing value's and.behaviors.
In Custody Drug Treatment Program
Parolees who are failing in the community or in the;parole office STAR
class can.begin,their recovery,while still on parole,'in an In Custody Drug
Treatment Program(ICDTP).
ICDTP classes+i;are held in county jail facilities while parolees serve 60 days.
After the completion of the in-custody phase of the{program, participants
are required to complete 30 days of residential aftercare in the community.
In addition,60 days of voluntary aftercare is provided upon release from
ICDTP.
This program gives parolees an understanding of substance abuse and
recovery using curriculum that includes The Cycle of Addiction,The
Process of Recovery,Stress and Anger Management, Relationships,
Relapse Prevention,and Successful Transition Planning.
Parolee Substance Abuse Program
The Parolee Substance Abuse Program(PSAP)is a supervised,intensive 90-day .
substance abuse education program for parolees located at the Folsom Transitional
Treatment Facility. The program helps parolees within a controlled prison environment to
understand substance abuse and recovery using curriculum that includes The Cycle of
Addiction,The Process of Recovery,Stress and Anger Management, Healthy
Relationships,and Relapse Prevention.
Teachers work on-on-one with parolees to develop a personalized Community Transition
Plan. Specific risk areas are addressed throughout the plan that also includes educational
and employment strategies and other vital resources.
A 90-d4 voluntary aftercare program upon release from PSAP is provided by Substance
Abuse Services Coordinating Agencies. .
CDCR Contacts:
Director , Lynn Mackey'i 11925.942.5308
Division Project Specialist Sandy Matgen 925.942.5302
FAX , 11925.942.5310
rrirrthern California - - -: d925.942.5ci al Shannon Swain 320
Project Coordinator '' M_arc Armstrong 925.942.5328
Northern.California f
Project Coordinator' '+ Jim Sanford 925.942.5301
Northern California
httn•//�anxnxi rrrna lr1 7 �o „o/�*o.,n',o/ol+o.a/...7.. L.�....t •,,••••,.^""
CCCOE Educational Opportunitiies CDC Page 3 of.-5
FAX 11925.942.5310 1
Project Coordinator Sam Williams 1916.351.5891
Northern California (FTTF)
FAX 11916.608.9719
Technology Specialist Amy Nichols 11925.296.1502
Northern California
FAX 11925.296.1531
Principal P_ a__meta Branch 11559.255.9486---]
Central California
Project Coordinator Robert Walker 559.255.6651
Central California
Project Coordinator David Jauregui. 661.391.2098
Central California
Technology SpecialistSonnw Bigler 559.255.9467
Central California
Principal Laura Strachan 951.845.4359
Southern California
Project Coordinator Blair Bradley 909.806.3516 ext.
Southern California 2016
Project Coordinator Carolyn.LePage JF619.441.2302 ext.
Southern California 11320
Project Coordinatorne.Mierzwik 951:845.4097
Southern California Ira
Southern Technology.Specialist Chris.Wilson 925.457.8520
Administrative Assistant It Southern Annette Apodaca 925.942.5325
Region
Administrative Assistant 11 Central Region JEd McCarty 925.942.5309
Administrative Assistant II Northern Jean Walker 11925.942.5304
Region
FAX 11925.296.1559
Administrative Assistant II Northern Janette Kofler 916.351.5928
Region(FTTF) C
FAX 916.608.9719
Data TechnicianVinpent_Pa_ng 925.296.1505
Data Technician Kham 925.296.1503
Phaxav�raseuth 1i
Data Technician Christie.Underwood 925:296.1504
FAX 11925.296.1531
Warehouse WorkerRichard Gamba 925.296.1506
FAX 925.942.5310
77 Santa Barbara Road
Pleasant Ml,Cafibmia"M
(925)9423388
httn•//www rcenekl) ra
Attachment 2
Corrections Reform
County Policy Principles and Guidelines
Preamble
In light of the state's recent focus on corrections reform — primarily on recidivism
and overcrowding in stale detention facilities, counties feel it{is essential to
articulate their values and objectives as vital participants in the overall corrections
continuum. Further, counties understand that they must be active participants in
any.successful effort to improve the corrections system in our state. Given that
local and state corrections systems are interconnected, 'true reform must consider
the advantage — if not necessity — of investing in local programs and services to
help the state reduce the rate' of growth in the prison population. Front-end
investment in local programs 'and initiatives will enrich the changes'currently being
contemplated to the state system and, more importantly, will yield greater
economic and social dividends that benefit communities across the state.
Recognizing that preserving public safety a matter of paramount importance in
communities statewide =- will be enhanced by ensuring that appropriate attention
and commitment are focused',on rehabilitation for adult and juvenile offenders,
counties offer the following Corrections Reforms Principles and Guidelines that, we
.believe, will help advance discussions between the state and counties.
Fundamental Principles
■ An optimum corrections strategy must feature a strong and committed
partnership between the state and local governments.
i;
• State and local authorities must focus on making productive use of offenders'
time while in custody or under state or local supervision. A shared
commitment to rehabilitation can help address the inextricably linked
challenges of recidivism and facility overcrowding. The most effective
method of rehabilitation is one that maintains ties to an offender's
community.
• Programs and services must be.adequately funded to enable counties to
accomplish their functions in the corrections system and to ensure successful
outcomes for offenders;; To the extent that new programs or services are
contemplated; support must be in the form of a dedicated, new and
sustained funding ,source-rather than a redirection of existing resources.
■ System and process changes must recognize that the 58 California counties
have unique characteristics, differing capacities, and diverse environments.
Programs should be designed to.promote innovation at the local level and to
permit maximum flexibility, so that services can best target individual
community needs and capacities.
■ Counties and the state can best achieve their shared objectives by.focusing
on results both-inthe form of improved offender outcomes and community
safety.
Adopted November 30,2006,
Corrections Reform
County Policy Principles and Guidelines • Page 2
Reform Policy Guidelines
The following reform policy guidelines represent specific proposals that serve to
promote the principles outlined above.
• Keys to Slowing the Prison Population Growth: Investment in local
programs and facilities. The state's investment in local programs and
facilities returns an overall benefit to the state corrections system and
community safety. State support of local'programs and facilities will aid'
materially in addressing the "revolving door" problem in state and local
detention facilities.
Thestate should;;invest in .improving, expanding and renovating local
detention facilities to address overcrowding, early releases, and
improved delivery of inmate health care. .Incentives should be
included to.encourage in-custody treatment programs and other
services.
13 The state.should; invest in adult probation services — using as a
potential-model the.Juvenile,Justice Crime Prevention Act Q]CPA) — to
build,a,continuum of intervention, prevention, and supervision services
for adult offenders.
13 The state should continue to fully support the.successful JJCPA
initiative, which provides a range of juvenile crime prevention and
intervention programs and which represents a critical component of
an ove'rail crime `reduction and public safety improvement strategy.
Diverting juveniles from a life of offending will help to reduce pressure
on the'adult system:
• The state should invest in mentally ill in-custody treatment and
jail diversion programs, where treatment and services can help
promote long-ter,,,m stability in mentally ill offenders or.those with co-
occurring disorders, decrease recidivism, and divert appropriate
offenders out of the criminal justice system.
• The state should;,,continue to invest in. alcohol and drug treatment
and diversion programs, including but not limited to outpatient
treatment facilities, given that the vast majority of inmates instate
and local systems struggle with addiction, which is a primary factor in
their criminality.
■ Inmate reentry (programs. Reentry programs represent a promising
means for addressing recidivism by providing a continuum of care that
facilitates early risk assessment, prevention, and transition of inmates back
into the community through appropriate treatment, life skills training, job
placement, and other services and supports. The state should consider
California State Association of Counties
1100 K Street,Suite 1101•Sacramento,CA•95814
(916)327-7500-FAX:(916) 441-5507
Adopted November 30,2006 www.csac.counties.org
Corrections Reform
County Policy Principles and Guidelines • Page 3
further investment in rrultiagency programs authorized under SB 6181, which
are built on proven, evidence-based strategies including comprehensive pre-
sentence assessments, in-custody treatment, targeted case management,
and the development of an individualized life plan. These programs promote
a permanent shift in the way nonviolent felony offenders are managed,
treated and released into their respective communities. Examples of
program elements that,have been demonstrated to improve offenders'
chances fora successful reintegration into their communities upon release
from custody'include, but are not limited to, the following:
13 Early risks and needs assessment that incorporates assessments of the
need for treatment of alcohol and other drug abuse, and the degree of
need for literacy; vocational and mental health services;
In-custody treatment that is appropriate to each individual's needs —
no one'-size-fits-all programming;
After°care and relapse prevention services to maintain a "clean and
sober" lifestyle;
13 Strong,linkages to treatment, vocational training, and support services
in the community;
Prearranged housing and employment (or vocational training) for,
offenders before`release into their communities of residence;
13 Preparation of the community and offenders' families to receive and
support each offender's new law-respecting and productive.lifestyle
before release through counseling and public education that recognize
and address the inter-generational impact and cycles of criminal
justice system involvement.
Long-term rnentorship and support from faith-based and other
community and cultural support organizations that will last a lifetime,
not just the duration of the parole period; and
Community-based treatment options and sanctions.
1
Counties believe that such ,reentry programs should include incentives for
inmate participation.
■ Siting of new facilities. Counties acknowledge that placement of
correctional facilities is controversial. However, the state must be sensitive
to community response to changing the use of, expanding, or siting new
correctional facilities (prisons, community correctional facilities, or reentry
facilities). Counties and other affected municipalities must be.involved as
active participants in planning and decision-making processes regarding site
selection. Providing for,security and appropriate mitigations to the local
community are essential.
1 Chapter 603, Statutes of 2005.
California State Association of Counties
1100 K Street,Suite 101•Sacramento,CA•95814
(916)327-7500•FAX:(916) 441-5507
Adopted November 30,2006 www.csac.counties.org
Corrections Reform
County Policy Principles and Guidelines • Page 4
Impact on local treatrnent capacity. Counties and the state must be aware of
the impact on local communities' existing,treatment capacity (e.g., mental health,
drug treatment, vocational services, sex offender treatment) if the correction
reforms contemplate a major'±new demand on services as part of development of
community correctional facilities, reentry programs, or other locally based
programs. Specialized treatment services that are not widely available are likely
the first to be overtaxed. To prevent adverse impacts upon existing alcohol and
drug and mental health 'treatment programs for primarily non-criminal justice
system participants, treatment capacity shall be increased to accommodate criminal
justice participants. In addition, treatment capacity shall be separately developed
and funded.
Emerging and best practices. Counties support the development and
implementation of a mechanism for collecting and sharing of best practices that can
help advance correction reform efforts.
California State Association of Counties
1100 K Street,Suite 101•Sacramento,GA•95814
(916)327-7500•FAX:(916) 441-5507
Adopted November 30,2006 www.csac.counties.org
a
Attachment 3
TABLE 45A
TOTAL F=ELONS PAROLED AND REPAROLED FROM AN INSTITUTION
BY REGION AND COUNTY OF PAROLE
CALENDAR YEAR 2006
-- ----------------- ---- -----
I I I TYPE OF PAROLE I
IL I---------------------------------------I '
I I TOTAL I . FIRST PAROLE I REPAROLE I
II-----r-------------+-------------------+-------------------I
i I NUMBER .IPERCENT I NUMBER (PERCENT I NUMBER IPERCENT 1
------------------------------------------------------- +----------+--------I
1TOTAL I. 131,3561 100.01 67,3851 100 ,01 63,9711 100.01
----------------------'+-----,---------------------------------------------
IREGION OF PAROLE I I I I I I I
I----------------------r1
[REGION I/ISPU 1 33,6791 . 25.61 14,6141 21,71 19,065( 29.81
---------------------- +----------+--------
IREGION II I 26,5121 20.21 10,8461 .16.11 15,6661 24.51
1------------------------+----------+--------+-=--------+------- +----------+--------1
IREGION III I 32,6561 24.91 21;6891 32.21 ' 10,9671 17.11
---------------------------------+--------
IREGION IV I 38,5091 29.31 20,2361 30.101 18,2731 28.61
I---------=-----------------------------------------------------,---------------------I
ICOUNTY OF PAROLE I I I I I I i
I----------------------- I
IALAMEDA I 6,2701 4.81 2,7991 4.21 3,4711 5.41
I-----=-------------"---`-+----------+--------+----------+--------+----------+--------I
(ALPINE 1 41 0.01 11 0:`01 31 0.01
I----------------------`+----------+--------+----------+--------+----------+-------I
IAMADOR 1 501 0:01 - 351 0.11 151 0.01
I----------------------•-+----------+--------+----------+----- '-+----------+--------I
(BUTTE, 11,0861 0.81 492E 9..,71 5941 0.91
I'------------------------+-------.---+--------+----------+--------+----------+--------I
ICALAVERAS 1 721 0.11 461 0.11 241 . 0.01
I-----------------------------------+--------+----------+--------+----------+--------I
)COLUSA 1 491 0.01 261 0.01 231 0.01
I----------------- ----- ---------+--------+----------+--------I oc>5
(CONTRA COSTA 1 1,9871 1.51 6141 0.91 1,3731. 2.11
I------------------------+-----`----+--------+----------+--------+----------+--------I �o
DEL
NORTE
I--- ----- I 991 0.11 41.1 --- I
581 ---
IEL DORADO 1 2991 0.21 1281 '0.21 1711 0.31
I------------------------+----------+--------+----------+--------+----------+--------I
IFRESNO 1 5,2421 4.01 1,9231 2.91 3,3191 5.21
----------------;------+----------+---`----+-`-------- r+----------+--------I
IGLENN I 1151 0.11 511 0:11 641 0.11
I------------------------+----------+--------+----=-----+--------+----------+--------I
IHUMBOLDT 1 7831 0.61 2781 0.41 5051 0.81
1----------------------=-+----------+--------+----------+--------+----------+--------I
11MPERIAL 1 4211 0.31 1551 0.21 2661 0.41
1-----------------------+----------+--------+----------+--------+----------+--------I
,(INTERSTATE PAROLE UNIT, ( ( I I I I I
( (ISPU) 1 1941 0.11 1881 0.31 61 .0.01
I-----------------------+----------+--------+--=-------+--------+----------+--------I
IINYO 1 341 0.01 291. 0.0) 51 0.01
I---------------------- -----+--------+----------+------=-+----------+--------f
(KERN 1 4,4831 3.41 2,2511 3.131 2,2261 3.51
1-------------=-------- +----------+--------+------------------------- +--------I
IKINGS 19461 0.71 3701 0.51 5761 0.91
I-------------------------------'=----+--=--.---+---------.-+--------+----------+--------I
(LAKE 1 3321 - 0.31 1331 0.21 1991, 0.31
I------------------------+----------+--------+----------+------- +----------+--------I
ILASSEN 1 117.1 0.11 461 0.11 711 0.11
------------------------+----------+--------+----------+-------------------+--------
1LOS ANGELES'. I 32,7611 24.91 21,7331 32.31 11,0281 17.21
I-----------------------+----------+--------+----------+--------+--------'--+--------I
IMADERA 1 7701 0.61 3031 0.41 4671 0.71
I---------------'-------='+----------+--------+----------+--------+----------+--------I
IMARIN 1 631 0.01 301 0.01 331 0.11
I-----------------------+--------=-+--------+-------- +------- +----------+--------I
IMARIPOSA I 381 0.01 211 0.01 171 0.01
I-----------------------+----------+----=---+----------+--------+----------+'--------I
1MENDOCINO 1 3741 0.31' . 1391 0.21 2351 0.41
I----------------------=+----------+--------+----------+--------+----------+--------I
IMERCED 1 1,0191 0.81 4321 0.61 5871 0.91
CALIFORNIA PRISONERS AND PAROLEES 63
Attachment 4
California Department of
Corrections Parolees
By County
COUNTY °ACTIVE PAROLEES s RELEASED IN 2006 REVOKED on
on 10116/07 10118/07
1 Alameda 3938 2799 777
2 Alpine: 2 1 1
3 Amador 92 35 5
4 Butte, 1198 492148
5 Calaveras 102 48 23
6 Colusa 57 49 1 6
7 Contra Costa 1530 614 284
8 Del Norte - 139 41 14
9 1EI Dorado 341 128 47
10 iFresno 5253 1923 1206
11 Glenn 135 51 26
12 Humboldt 584 278 83
13 Impeiial 356 155 Be
14 Ingo 41 29 5
15 Kern 4840 2257 781
16 Kings 942 370 131
17 Lake 350 133 43
16 Lassitn 105 46 13
19 Los Angeles - 40029 21733 2492
20 IMedera 631 303 129
21 Marin 167 30 17
22 Mari'osa - 50 21 3
23 IMendicifto 268 139 37
24 Merced 960 432 lei
25 Mcdoc - -28 14 11
26 Mono 21 9 3
27 Monterey 1177 525 162
28 Napa 227 100 15
29 Nevads 141 42 11
30 Oranile 7479 6037 ' 914
31Placer 646 290 94
32 Plumes 50 32 9
33 lRiverside 8425 4370 1189
34 Sacrunento 4568 3337 719
35 ISan Benito ,'111 45 18
36 ISan Biemardim 10650 5521 1665
37 San Diego 8566 4123 1266
38 ISan Francisco - 1601 583 302
39 ISan Joaquin 2545 1271 577
40 San Luis Obispo; 1061 479 79
41 ISan Mateo 1143 636 118
42 Sante Barbara - 1209 542 189
43 Santa Clara 4642 1846 430
44 ISantse Cruz 459 199 82
45 IShasta 1297 545 171
46 ISierra 5 4 'o
47 Siskiyou 144 58 20
48 Solano 1602 692 219
49 Sonoma 873 365 111
50 IStanislaus 1694 637 262
51 Isufler 427 236 74
52 ITeharna 364 214 69 -
53 Trini'r 50 22 6
54 Tulare 1930 747 293
55 Tuolumne 134 51 18
56 ventura 1565 797 i, 309
57 Yoto 652 331 109
58 Yuba 414 213 97
No County Identified(out of state,possible
deportation) 6732 25767 892
total 134742 92987 17043
LEGEND
2FromalParole•Adive Parolees are parolees on parole on 10/16107.
From OBIS-Released in 2006:"First Parole"the number of people released to the specific
county,from an adult institution in 2006.This number includes first termers,new termers
and Parole Violators With a New Term(PVWNT),
Division of Reentry and Recidivism Reduction 2/29/2008
Attachment 5
Data Analysis Unit Department of Corrections"and Rehabilitation
Estimates and Statistical Analysis Section State of.Califomia
Offender Information Services Branch January 2008
TABLE 2B
'TOTALMALE FELONS PAROLED AND REPAROLED FROM
AN ADULT INSTITUTION BY COUNTY OF PAROLE
CALENDAR YEAR 2007
TYPE OF PAROLE .
TOTAL FIRST PAROLE REPAROLE
COUNTY OF PAROLE NUMBER PERCENT NUMBER PERCENT NUMBER PERCENT
TOTAL - 123,645 100'.0 60,147 100.01 63,498 100.0
ALAMEDA 6,486 5.2 2,609 4.3 3,877 6.1
ALPINE 11 0.0 7 0.0 4 0.0
AMADOR 46 0.0 30 0.0 16 0.0
BUTTE 1,033 0.8 429 0.7 604 1.0
CALAVERAS 41 0.0 27 0.0 14 0.0'
COLUSA 33 0.0 16 0.0 17 0.0
CONTRA COSTA 1,862 1.5 532 0.9 15330 2.1
DEL NORTE 100 0.1 50 0.l ! 50 0.1
ELDORADO 326 0.3 115 0.2 211 0.3
FRESNO 5,2924.3 1,948 3.2 3,344,, 5.3
GLENN 134 0.1 54 0.1 80 0.1
HUMBOLDT758 0.6 2"61 0.4 497 0.8
IMPERIAL 377 0.3 139 0.2 238 0.4
INTERSTATE PAROLE UNIT(ISP.U) 175 0.1 169 0.3 6 0.0
INYO 39 0.0 32 .0.1 7 0.0
KERN 4,260 3.4 044 3.2 2,3161 3.6
KINGS 897 0.7 3650.6 532 0.8
�-- ----
LAKE 342" 0.3 159 0.3 183 ! 0.3
LASSEN 101 0.1 54 0.1 47 0.1
LOS ANGELES 28,55323:1 19,461 32.4 9,092 14.3
MADERA 703 0.6 249 0.41 454 0.7
MARIN 68 0.1 281 0.0! 40 0.1
(Continued)
Reference Number: MISC-5
Attachment 6 -
Data Analysis Unit Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Estimates and Statistical Analysis,Section State of California
Offender Information Services Branch January 2008
TABLE IB
TOTAL]FELONS PAROLED AND REPAROLED FROM
AN ADULT INSTITUTION BY COUNTY.OF PAROLE
CALENDAR YEAR 2007
TYPE OF PAROLE
TOTAL FIRST PAROLE REPAROLE
COUNTY OF PAROLE NUMBER PERCENT NUMBER PERCENT NUMBER PERCENT
TOTAL 137,478 1.00.0 68,104 100.01 69 374 100.0
ALAMEDA 6,831 - 5.0 2,763 4.1 4,068 5.9
ALPINE1 I 0.0 7 0.0 4; 0.0
AMADOR 50 0.0 31 0.011 19 0.0.
BUTTE 1,138 0.8 494 0.71 6441 0.9
CALAVERAS - 49 OA 29 - 0 0 I -- - 20 1--- --0.0
COLUSA - 39 0.0 21 0.01 18 0.0
CONTRA COSTA 1,989 1.4 577 0.8 1,412 2.0
DEL NORTE 107 0.1 55 0.1 52 0.1
ELDORADO 354 0.3 128• 0.2 226 0.3
FRESNO 5,992 4.4 2,239 3.31 3,753'1_ 5.4
GLENN j 145 0.1 61 0.1 841 0.1
HUMBOLDT i ~
804 0.6 285 0.44 519' 0.7
IMPERIAL 403 0,3 152 0.2, 251 ! 0.4
INTERSTATE PAROLE UNIT(ISPU) 183 0.1 176 0.31 7 0.0
INYO_- 43 0.0 35 0.1 j --8; - - _- 0.0
KERN - 4,772 3.5 2,229 3.31 2,543 i 3.7
KINGS 1,022 0.7 429 0.6 593 0.9
LAKE 386 `0.3 190 0.3 196' 0.3
LASSEN 104 0.1 55 0.1 49 0.1
LOS ANGELES 31,970 23.3 22,020 32.3 9,950 14.3
MADERA 790 0.6 282 0.4 508�i -0.7
MARIN 71 0.1 29' 0.01' 42,1 0.1
(Continued)
Reference Number: MISC--�l
Parolee arrested in sexual assault- ContraCostaTimes.com Page 1 of 3
Attachment 7
CHAPMAN
► :
• the Unique Needi'
vin"
BAY AREA Adult Leartiersfor Over 501
Sign in
Home News My Town Sports Business Entertainment Living Columns Opinion Help Jc
Obituaries Bay&State ` Nation&World I Crime&Courts Education Health I Politics Science I Growth I Environment
Most Viewed Most Emailed �r7
del.icio.us ' DiggV. Reddit r YahooMyWeb Google C.1!Facebook
? (From the last 12 hours)
1. Cows stampede on 1- CQ RePrint ;=;Print 1 Email
680 freeway near
Concord
2. Two arrested, three Parolee arrested in sexual assault
police cars damaged `'
after short Concord By Kaci Fischer
pursuit West County Times
3. Customers Still Article Launched: 05/15/2008 12:05:47 PM PDT
without power in
Walnut Creek after EI Cerrito police arrested a parolee theysay sexually assaulted a woman on
outage the Ohlone Greenway on Monday night and possibly tried to attack others earlier in th(
4. Man trapped for
nearly three days in 'Oakland resident Troyshawn Robinson,20,approached a man and'woman walking or
wrecked car off 1-680 -Avenue and brandished a knife,police Cpl. Sue Garman said.
in North...
5. Russell to prove he's 'He mugged them,then held the man at bay with the knife while he sexually assaulted
game-ready said.
6. Woman's hair traps
her in overturned car "'He did cut her a little with the knife,"Garman said."But the knife injury was not seriou
after Antioch accident
The Times does not identify victims of sexual assault without their consent.
The man left about 8:15 p.m.and witnesses called police. Patrol officers searched stre
1Norte BART station and found Robinson,Garman said;witnesses identified Robinson
Top Classifieds found property belonging to the victims on Ihim,according to police.
JOBS AUTOS RENTALS REAL
ESTATE They also found property belonging to a woman who was mugged in a similar crime el
Garman said,and Oakland police also areinow investigating Robinson.
Bank Foreclosures/
freelocaleastbayhomeinfo.com El Cerrito police say someone similarly approached another woman near the BART sty
Click for Details managed to flee.
All Listings
Robinson,who was on parole for robbery and sexual assault convictions,was booked
El Cerrito police reported no other similar crimes of late on the Ohlone Greenway,
a trail known for mu(
Del Norte BART.
Advertisement
Reach Karl Fischi
httr� !/unxnv �nnfr��netofimccrnm/.,iw,cn,+ 7 ...-*�� - JAnIM0ne
arrested, three police cars damaged after short.iConcord pursuit - ContraCostaTimes.... Page 1 of 1
Attachment 8
CONTMCOS-
fATIMES!
Conti aCoataTimesXott
Two arrested, three police dama
ged.
g was hurt and the car was not seriously
cars damaged after, short The two men were identified as Ernesto Chalco,25,
Concord pursuit of Pacheco;and Leonard Covarrubias,37;of
Antioch. Both were arrested on suspicion of vehicle
theft, possession of stolen property,evading police
By Roman Gokhman and parole violations.
Contra Costa Times
As two other officers were responding to Windsor
Article Launched:05/15/2008 10:23:19 PM PDT Place,their cars collided in the intersection of Fifth
CONCORD—Police arrested two mean early, Street and Mount Diablo Street,Wiesendanger said.
Thursday after short pursuit that ended when the The officers were not hurt but the cars were
suspect's car—which turned out to be stolen— moderately damaged.
failed to break through a cyclone fence.
Reach Roman Gokhman at 925-945-4780, or
Then,two officers responding to the conclusion of at rgokhman@bayareanewsgroup.com .
the pursuit crashed into each other,damaging their
patrol cars but escaping any injuries,police said.
The pursuit began at 3:51 a.m.when an officer
spotted a white 1997 Honda Accord speeding near
Clayton Road and Bailey Road, Concord police Lt.
Brian Wiesendanger said.
'Then (the officer)ran the plate and it came back as
stolen out of Concord,"he said.
The car,with two men inside,led police on a two-
minute,three-mile pursuit at speeds of up to 80
mph.The driver turned onto Fifth Street and then
onto Windsor Place,which is a dead end,
Wiesendanger said.
The driver attempted to drive through the cyclone
fence at the dead end of Windsor and into Loma
Vista Adult Education Center.
The car failed to break through the fence.
"It rolled back and into a patrol car,"he said.
Advertisement
Contrics-Kostal"nes (800) 598-4637 __
t
C SIpTIMES '
- CONTRA -.,.
Su y
Subscribe today!
fn sm y ca> roa•',
�If .1
WWW.contracostatimes.com/s ubscriberservices
Print Powered By
(4/29%2008) Mike Newman-drug-chg.pdf Page 1J
Attachment 9
Current inmates (see data date toright) 04/25/2008
at least one arrest charge is drug related (charge list on last page)
FAC BOOKINGS
1 426
2 729
3 76
4 350
{BOCK FAC) in Ito 4 and (BOOK FE_S STAt S), like ["Ck`,"IN]and
{CNG.OCDE_SECTI Cr,4 23152(6) VC
11370.;1, F6 11550(C) 23152/23175 VC
IN 11370.1(A) F6 11550(C) F5 23153(A) VC
11350 F6 11370.12(A)F6 115500, 23153(A) VC
11350 F6 11370.21-6 23140(A) 23153(A)/23560 VC
11350(() I6 11370.9 (A) :-FB 23152(A) / 23550 VC ' 23153(B) VC
11350(8) 1-6 11375(IB 1-13 23152(A) / 23550,5 VC 23153(B) VC
11351 F6 11375(B)(1) FS 23152(A) / 23550.5\/C 23222(A) VC
11351.5 FG 11377 F6 23152(A) VC 23222(A) VC
11352(A) FS 11377(A) F6 23152(A)i, VC 23222(8) VC
11352(A) F6 11377(,) F6 23152(A),' \023550 23223(A)VC
11353 F6 11377(;4)F6 23152(A)/ 23550 VC 23550 VC
11355 F6 1.1378 `F6 23152(A)%23175 -VC 23550(A)
11357 F6 11379 .1-6 23152(A)/23550 CVC 23550(A)
11357(A) F6 11379(,A) F6 23152(A)%23550 VC 23550(A) CVC
11357(A) F6 ,11379.5(A) FS 23152(A)%23550 VC 23550.5(A) CVC
11357(B) F6 11383(Q(1) FS 23152(A)/23550. 5 VC 4140 BP
11357(C) F6 11391 FS 23152(A)/23550. 5VC 4140BP
11358 F6, 11532 F6 23152(A)23550 VC 4573 PC
11359 F6 115321-6 23152(A)\/C 4573.5 PC
11360(A) F6 " . 11550_, 23152(B) / 23550 VC 4573.6 PC
11360(B) F5 11550 (B) 23152(B) / 23550.5 VC 66-101 Mc
11361(() 1-6 11550 F6 23152(13)'„ VC 61/(23152(A)
11361(B) F6 11550,(A) 23152(B)/ 23550 VC 61/(23152(0)
11364 F6 11550('O 23152(8)/23550 VC CVC40508(A)
11364.7(A) F6 11550(13) 23152(B)/23550 VC FM11350
113641-6 11550(6) 23152(8)/23550. 5 VC F8&11378
Page 1 Of 1
L{3/3/2008) Mike Newman- S&B 0708 Dpty..igt.Lt.Cpt for CptNewman.xls Page 1
Attachment 10
2007/08
DEPUTY
Descri tions ESTIMATED SALARY & BENEFITS
TOP STEP-At End of FY07/08
ase Pay $6,792.00
ducation Incentive $339.60
Safety Longevity $339.60
ife Insurance $2.10
I.C.A. (Medicare) $93.39
Retirement $4,865.99
Retiree Health Care $459.00
orker Compensation $560.49
nemployment Insurance $14,94
ealth Insurance $1,223.00
Salary&Benefit/Monthly $14,690.11
Salary& Benefit/Yearly $176,281.37
nnual Uniform Allowance $876.00
Holiday Pay(13) $6,792.01
AXIMUM TOTAL SALARY&
ENEFIT COSTS $183,949.38
VERTIME COSTS
Overtime Hourly Rate $58.78
ICA on Overtime Hourly Rate $0.73
nemployment on OT Rate $0.12
orkers Comp on OT Rate $4.41.
otal Overtime Hourly Costs $64.04
Preapared by Contra Costa County Office of the Sheriff-Fiscal Unit-9/25/07