HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 09122006 - D.2 I
'I
I
TO: ; BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ��.
Contra
FROM: j DENNIS M. BARRY, AICP _ '=�_ ;r Costa
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR ��,�-.: ��' County
r-
I
DATE: September 12, 2006
SUBJECT: CONTINUED HEARING REGARDING THE APPEAL OF THE ISSUANCE OF A
BUILDING PERMIT AT 1485 EMMONS CANYON ROAD IN THE ALAMO AREA.
WILLIAM AND MARIE PARSONS (APPELLANTS) KAREN AND LAWRENCE LESER
(OWNERS) (APN 193-6604011) (COUNTY FILE #Z106-11413) (DISTRICT Ill)
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATIONS) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
I. RECOMMENDATION
UPHOLD the issuance of the building permit which was based on the Community Development
Department's decision that the construction of the master bedroom closet and bathroom is
consistent with the Planned Unit District, and DENY the appellant's appeal.
I
i
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: ! X YES SIGNATURE
RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
APPROVE OTHER
SIGNATURE (S):
ACTION,OF BOARD-ON - v4 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER_
I
ISpeakers: -
'Jack Eskridge, Esq., representing the Leser's;
i Larry Leser, permit holder, resident of Alamo;
Marianne Sasso, resident of Alamo;
'Steve Vaccaro, Vaccaro Construction Co.
' I I
I j
VOTE OF.SU.I?ERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND
IV UNANIMOUS(ABSENT?� - CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN AND
AYES: NOES: ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF
ABSENT: I ABSTAIN: SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN
i
i
Contact: Aruna Bhat(335-1219) ATTESTED /01
Community Development j JOHN CUL E CLERK OF THE BOARD OF
cc: Community Development Department(CDD) ! SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
Carlos Baltadano, Building Inspection Director
William and Marie Parsons,Appellants �
Larry and Karen Leser, Owners
County Counsel BY. �/' , DEPUTY
Bryan Ranch Homeowner's Association
I �
r
f1
j
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
fi Contra
FROM: DENNIS M. BARRY, AICP; °w- � :�= Costa
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR ' '.,, µ County
DATE: September 12, 2006
SUBJECT: CONTINUED HEARING REGARDING THE APPEAL OF THE ISSUANCE OF A
BUILDING PERMIT AT 1485 EMMONS CANYON ROAD -IN THE ALAMO AREA.
WILLIAM AND MARIE PARSONS (APPELLANTS) KAREN AND LAWRENCE LESER
(OWNERS) (APN 193-660''-011) (COUNTY FILE #Z106-11413) (DISTRICT III)
.. j
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
� I
I. RECOMMENDATION
UPHOLD the issuance of the building permit which was based on the Community Development
Department's decision that the construction of the master bedroom closet and bathroom is
consistent with the Planned Unit District, and DENY the appellant's appeal.
CONTINUED;ON ATTACHMENT: . ! X YES SIGNATURE
RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
APPROVE OTHER
i
SIGNATURE (S):
ACTION OF BOARD ON , OD APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
j
I I
Speakers:`
!Jack Eskridge, Esq., representing the Leser's;
1.!Larry Leser, permit holder, resident of Alamo-
Marianne Sasso, resident of Alamo;
;Steve Vaccaro, Vaccaro Construction Co.
i
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS j I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT.THIS.IS A TRUE AND
,d UNANIMOUS (ABSENT�2fk CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN AND
AYES: NOES: ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN
i
.I 1
Contact: Aruna Bhat(335-1219) ATTESTED
Community Development. JOHN CUL E CLERK OF THE BOARD OF
cc: Community Development Department(CDD) SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
Carlos Baltadano, Building Inspection Director.
William and Marie Parsons,Appellants
Larry and Karen Leser,Owners ;
County Counsel BY / ;' ` ?_�� , DEPUTY
Bryan Ranch Homeowner's Association
j
I
i
September 12i, 2006
Board of Supervisors
File#: Z106-11;413
Page 2
I i
II. FISCAL IMPACT
The appellants (William and Marie-Jeane Parsons) have paid the initial appeal fee,of
$125.00. The property owners (Lawrence and.Karen Leser)will be required to pay for staff
time in excess of$125.00 associated with.the processing of this appeal.
I
III. BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS
Thi'S item was heard by the Board of Supervisors on July 25, 2006. The Board took
testimony from speakers and continued the item to August 8, 2006 in order to allow for a
meeting with the parties involved including the homeowners association. The August 8,
2006 hearing was further continued to September 12, 2006. However, no meeting has
been held between the various parties to date.
i
The appellants are appealing the addition of a 270 square foot master bedroom closet and
bathroom at 1485 Emmons Canyon Road in Alamo. The subject property is located within
the,Bryan Ranch Development located in Alamo. The development plan for Bryan Ranch
was approved as a Planned Unit District in 1978 and fi.led on June 5, 1979.
I j
In September of 2005, the. Lesers requested approval of a master bedroom closet and
bathroom addition. The addition was approved on September 28, 2005 by the Community
Development Department and !a building permit was issued by the Building Inspection
Department on April 4, 2006 and the appeal was filed on May 2, 2006 by William and ,
Marie-Jeane Parsons.
I
The single family home is located on an approximately 0.35 acre lot and was constructed in
1981. It is situated in an established neighborhood surrounded by other single family
residences. The proposed addition is on the west side of the existing residence surrounded
by existing trees.
IV. APPEAL DECISION
Listed below is a summary of'the appellant's statements (letter attached) and staff's
responses.
A: Appeal Point: We never agreed to the extension of the existing wall by 4 feet. Our.
neighbors asked for our approval to build out to the eaves'.edge, i.e. between one and
two feet. They explained they did not want to change the roof design, nothing would go
beyond the edge, and the wall would be cantilevered on the existing foundation. Karen
had talked about moving the bedroom or bathroom into the spare bedroom. Every time
we talked about the remodeling, they were consistent with these representations.
Response: The current zoning designation for the subject property is a Planned Unit
Development (P-1) in the approved Bryan Ranch subdivision (SD5026). The addition
was approved with a minimum sideyard setback of 5 feet with a 25 foot minimum
between buildings shown on the site plan and a 15-foot rear yard setback requirement.
The issues presented by the; appellant are civil matters and not matters in which the
County intervenes. I
,I
I
September 12, 2006
Board of Supervisors
File#: Z106-11413
Page 3
i
i
B.! Appeal Point: The approvailletter dated March 23, 2005 refers to the 8 months timing. If
construction is not started within 8 months,the approval is automatically revoked by the
Architectural Committee and a new approval has to be applied for. Thus the approval
was revoked automatically on November 23, 2005. A revoked approval can't be
extended. Despite this the�Leser's asked for an extension in January 2006 and they
received it. We were never notified.
I
Response: The approval letter being referenced relates to the Architectural Committee.
The approval granted by the Architectural Committee is strictly between the homeowner
and their homeowner's association (HOA). The HOA is not affiliated with the County,
but is a concerned neighborhood group and the County considers their
recommendations. However, the County follows the rules and regulations set forth by
the County Zoning Ordinance and the Conditions of Approval for the specific subdivision
or project. Concerns regarding the processes of the HOA should be addressed to the
HOA. j
I I
C Appeal Point: I informed Mr. Bloomquist that the condition of approval no. 2 was not
met since we had never been informed of the 4 feet and had not seen the plan. He also
indicated that Larry Leser called him and said that it was four feet and that probably my
husband had seen early plans when they asked him to sign the neighbor's form in
March 2005, and that the plans were changed thereafter. Mr. Bloomquist indicated that
since I had seen the plans at Bate's offices, the condition was now met. The fact of the
4 feet impacting on our rights was not relevant.
Response: Please refer to the response of Appeal Point B.
D Appeal Point: The real issue is: who decides who gets to build on more than their
share of the 25 feet empty space requirement? Were we not in a P-1, the decision
would have been fully that of the County, and we would have been notified by the
County. Because we are in a P-1, the County is looking at the approval of the
architectural committee. This one is only looking at the aesthetic and not addressing the
issues raised here. It became extinct at the end of November.
i
Response: The purpose of a P-1 zoning district is to provide a cohesive design where
flexible regulations can be lapplied. Condition of approval #2 of the development plan
County File #3011-77 states that"the guide to be used to establish setbacks, yard and
height dimensional requirements and other provisions for development and use on each
lot shall be the single family residential district R-15". In order to provide abetter design
within the development, the master developer Smith Company requested flexible
setbacks. Through a letter. dated November 16, 1979, the Community Development
Department granted 5 feet lminimum sideyard setback with a 25 foot distance between
buildings.
The appellant has raised a concern that the neighbor's addition may take away her
rights to build an addition on her side of the property. If an addition is proposed by Mrs.
Parsons, the County would apply the R-15 standards as a guide since the P-1 zoning
district is flexible. The County's approval of the addition located at 1485 Emmons
i Canyon Road by no means takes Mrs. Parson's rights to construct an addition on her
property. The County does not base its approval exclusively on that of the Homeowners
I
September 12, 2006
Board of Supervisors
File#: Z106-11413
Page 4
Association (in this case the Architectural Committee), but respects and appreciates its
efforts and comments.
E.1 Appeal Point: R-15 lots require a minimum sideyard of ten feet and an aggregate of 25
feet while in the R-20, the minimum sideyard is 15 feet with an aggregate of 35 feet.
These requirements are in line with what we were told when we bought our house from
j the Smith Company 23 years ago. We understand from some of our neighbors who
added on recently that they were told by their architect of a total minimum space
between 25 feet are required between houses. A fair middle is 12.5 feet each. They do
not have that distance from their building to the lot line. So we already have to keep a
bigger portion of our land un-built than what they have. By giving them an additional 4
feet of building space, we are losing the same build-able space on our lot. We are not
interested in having them that close to our lot line or in decreasing the value of our lot,
for their benefit. There is no reason to do it. It is not fair that the first one gets to do
this.
Response: Please refer to;the response of Appeal Point D.
F.1 Appeal Point: Such issuers can impact a lot of people who are in planned unit
development. Architectural. committees are not extensions of the County of Zoning
decisions. They are volunteers not professional. Exceptions are made under pressure.
The county may feel that the Architectural committee considered the full impact of the
issue. Clearly that is not the case here.
I
Response: The County's clearance was based on the applicable conditions of approval.
Issues related to the operations of the HOA should be directed to the HOA.
i
V. CONCLUSION
The clearance of the building permit which allowed a five foot sideyard is consistent with
decisions dating back to the initial construction of the community. The clearance of this
building permit does not limit the appellants' ability to file for a building permit on their
property which would provide for less than 25 feet between buildings. The approved permit
provides that the R-15 zoning!standards are the guide to development. The issuance of
this building permit complies with the Planned Unit District requirements.
i I
i
i
i
I i
U I I I I I I I I lJ. L--/.Up Q I Ll I I.I L Wllllnm V.Wnllon, III
f--�Innsnnl Hill—Chairmnn
Linty Administration Building, North Wina Cel. ��� Alborl B. Compaglie
oui�t�
CMartinez —vice Cnniim
".0. Box-951 / ConaldE.Anderson
Martinez,; California 945053 Moraoa
I Elton Brombacher
Anthony A.IDehaesus Glrector o! Plannlnc Rlcnmond
I
i
Pnone. William L.Milano
J;' —_�9 1 Fliltsourg
Carolyn D.Phillips
R ooeo
I '
Andrew H.Young
t;camo
I
i
November 16, 1979
i
i
I
I
I
I
Mr. Randall L. Smith, President
. :Harold W. Smith Company �
2076 Mt. Diablo Boulevard
Wainut Creek, California X94:96
!Dear Mr. Smith:
I
_ I
lire setback: and sidevard uimensions as outlined �n your letter of November lE,
j1979 are in accordance with the Planned Unit District conditions for Whitegate.
The same dimensional standards should ue applied to tike Bryan Ranch Planned
!
Unit Development. These minimum standards are as follows:
(lj Setback - 15 feet for dwell.lnc, and 17.5 Teet for the baraoC:.
2) Sideyards - 5 feet any 20 feet with 25 feet betwecr. nui.ldii�-s - ploy.
o-.
f0ri'buiidina permit's' to show the 25 feet between
i
buildings '
i
(3) Rearyard - 15 feet minimum.
i
P, copy of th.is letter will be at the front counter so that thea-' will be no
unnecessary delay in the issuance of permits .
I
Sincerely yours,
i
Anthon-,,- A. Dehaesus
Director o' Plann�nc
I
i I
/Normal: :,. llalverson
SiDccial Projects Planner
I
NLh/mb
I
!
cc: --ie No . SubEivlsioni5026
=ileNo . 1787-R� (CoiIid. UT,
File No. 3011-77 (Coed. #2
Al Rangel
I
t�AROI:,: � �NiITH COMPANY o I c; ) ,,�. . .i
Q�h
I, r
9
24
Nov
I
9 9S7-6700 r NovemDa 13 1970
Nir ?corm Haiverson
i
Oon'=ra Costa Planning Depart�en=
P.0' Boy: 451
I• I
Martinez, CA. 94553
Dear Norm:
I
This letter is to confirm our, conversation of this morning with regard to
the; side yards and set back 1n subdivision 5026 , which is part of tnc-_ Bryan
Ranch Planned tinit Development.
_ `'aul will recall that in Whitel Gate Planned unit Deveiapment adjoining the
Bryan Ranch, we adopted a poi!icy which basically allowed the R-15 Zorning
side yard and set backs to apply with the following excep=ions:
1. Side yards could be 5 and 20' instead of the conventional
10 and 15' as long as we maintained 25' between 'ouildings.
The location, and distance from the adjoining building was
indicated on the plot pian at the time of permit application.
i
i
�. Building set back was allowed "to be 15 ' for the dwelling
and '17z ' for the garag;, instead of the conventional 20 ' allowed
for R-15 zoning.
I I
We would like to extend this policy into the Bryan Ranch because it gives
yis more fie):ibility to comfortably site the homes on some of our more un-
usually shaped lots, and in addition, on sloping streets, you will recall that
we nave run 4 ;l slopes betweer'y buildings and that allowed us to shift all the
homes to the upper property lines to keep from building over the slopes.
I
We used this exception to theIR-15 guidelines on approximately 30% c� the
home's in White Gate with stat` approval_ on a case Dv case basis and would
appr'eclate very much the ability to do this in subdivision 5026.
I I
I
T would be happy to come to your office to discuss this matter if you feel
it necessary. li
Regards,
r1A.ROLL SMITE CON1P
Randall L.Smith j
President
CENTURY HOMES DEVELOPMENT COMPA Y
...i 20716 M'. D'iabic boulevard
i
I �
i
I
: ONDITION� OF APPROVAL Subdivision 5026 EX141BIT "A"
Q hNSUP HnOn On 1 W VP Mn P 15VOIJ rOCK WO M
hnnnrumcru M&A 21 , 1576, as NwcnAd hy the condiliurs
listed bcaow and the dond3tions lir the FAN] [Ovshumcn! Pi ill 501 i -77 .
The subdivision shall "Aform to the urovisions in Title 9 of the County
I Ordinance vodc. Any vnriance thcreficin must bc specificlaily applied foi-
and" shall not be allowed unless listed on the Planning Cojiimis5 ion ' s zoni-
tiDnal approval statcm#nt,
s. The existing curbed section of Green Valley Road from Stone VLL licy Road to
No, 1882 Green Valley Road shall be widened to a minimum of 32 fee* of
pavement two 12-foot 'lanes plus an B-fDO! parking Ane) . No Tecmatnatiov,
of existing pnvpment will be necessary as the vertical and horizmnal ajign-
mcnt of the existing palvement, is satisfactory for widening .
41. From No. 1881 to No. AS Green Valley Road (the southerly boundary of
Subdivision 5026) the 'existing pavement shall be widened to 24 feet.
Horizonta2 and possiblf vertical realignment of the road wi3l be necessar,,.:
at the curve at No. 1927 Green Valley Road to provide adequate silly distnncc .
1 With this exception , the existing pavement has satisfactory vextical nn,-"
horizontal alignment; widening only will M necessary.
5 From No. 1935 Green Valley Road to the bond in the existing road approximnic!"',
1 ,700 feet northerly, q i he road shall be widened to 28 feet wit h dikes in a
60-foot right-of-way, AThere are two vertical curves in this section which
shall be reconstructed 1to provide adequato sight distance, baked on collecto
road standards ,
6'. Northerly of the bend In the existing road (1 ,700 fact northerly of the
boundary of Subdivisioy 5026) to Lot 29C, Green Valley Road shall be con-
structed as a curbed 21-foot strcet with curbs or asphalt concrete dike A
a 60-foo: right Of-Wa,%0
711 From Lot. 290 to the nor kheriv boundary of Subdivision 5026, Green Valley MA
shall be constructed to arterial standards (curbed 40-foot street with side-
walks) , with apprDpriatC transitions from the 28-foot wide sez tion .
Bd A hardsurfaced pedestrian path shall be provided from No. 1881 Green Vallp:
Road to connect to the Olow sidewniks at Lot .29C'. Alternatavely, the
pedestrian path may be touted across the dam for the retention basin nc,
connect to Stone Valleyyoulnu ane: mitted along Green Valley Road snuth of
the basin.
t
92 The improvements to KrcQ VAlch' HoNj AM be dome concurrm ly, 1;'7 ?l)
phasc A the do clopmcni thnt wjjj be served by the road,
i oil In accordance wit; the 'provisions in Section 94-4 .414 of the Oydinnnzc Cod,,� ,
the ,owneTs of all existQg easemcnts within areas tc be conveyed to Contra
Costo County for road Qrposes shall consent to the dedication or deeding
of the right-of-way.
I II
liondit.lons Tot' A�)nrovi:l - Subdi. vision :)026 Y'a c 2 .
i I `
I
A11 lltl __'.1- diit_ibu-iOn , and service a" li--L
De installed unaer�rollnd. (OrEinance Code Clapte= 96-10)
i
1= The minimum -racic %or cures on all strects shall be 1' , (Ordinance
Code Section 95-6. 00�ji
I �
13. Trat.=it- control sigr.s, stop sighs , centerline stripinn ane: pavement
markings at all stow sirTlls Igil11 be reouired. These details shrill be
shown on the improvement pians. The subdivider,' s engineer will be
advised by the Public Works Department of the various signs, striping
and pavement markings requ:.red when the improvement plans are sub-
mitted for review.
'i I
14 . Street lights shall be :installed oil all public streets witJlin the Sub-
division and the entire subdivision shall be annexed to County Service
Area L-42 for the main enance and operation of the street lights , no:
including Green Valley jkoad. (Ordinance Code Chanter 96-6) ,
I
1S!. Sidewalks shall be constructed or all public streets except oil cull-de-Sac
and as noted on Green Valley Road ill Condition #8 above.
i
No mailboxes will be periii-ter; within the sidewalk, path or trail ar^_as.
The lulacement o mailboxes within the right-of-way shall conform to cur-
ren: standards 0 the r,ublic Works Department. The subdivider is advised
to contact the Postal Service and find a satisfacto y arrangement fo- hail
delivery (e. g. , reauest, in writing, delivery to individual or grouped
mailboxes behind the sidewalks) .
I
171. Storm drainage conveyeuII in a concentrated manner on private drives shall
not be allowed to drain across the sidewalk into the 1)ublic Streets, The
drainage shall be conveyed to a storm drain, or if drained to tilt strcct
shall be discharged th oucrh the curbs by means of County standard sidewalk
i
crosscrainS.
I ,
181' At least one 3-inch dialineter, nor-ie.rou5 drain sha:_ be installed for
each lot other than those designated 11H11 On rile tentative map througl'
the curbs and under tlhe; sidewalks to provide for future roof drain, eta.
connections from the individual lots. Locations will be determined on
the basis of grading and road improvement pians. Exceptions are to De
allowed wihere. lots do n'ot drain to streets,.
id Any section of t.ho storIm drainage systcm which conveys Storm water to
I '
1V111 11 the publ.7.c Stroc--Is nn,,! 1, 111.^..Ti' s Sabil'. i1 ]\ ^011=1'.Lbllt.c 11171+' Sll .il b '
installed in F: dedicated drainage casement,
M A1th0ug�1 the Storm' draipage system is shown in some actaii , cOmmnet on
the systerl will be Tlladei wlleI. t11C improvemcnt U1a115 a 'e SUDITIittecl :O:'
review. i
2' +' n me i S ccp'
The area S110wh1 On tllC CrltatlVe T11ar� O'r til d nt10r1 basin 1 ac�.. I�tilbl
The fiT1:11. limits shall be dCtermined On tllC basis 01 elloinecring dc:sit,n; b;`
the Public Works De,,Darthcnt, Lan6 Developniclht Div'_.Sion. Any rC6u'..r10 1.11
the area shall be permitted Only with the concurrence O_ the rublic WoT1.z
i i '
i
iIu?1ditioTls for A1)I)rova1 - S;11) , vision Pao- 7
I
I
I
L)cpartmcnt. Aria, excess ':rcL shall be shown ,,s 011e additional 1 Ot on
the :"Bice_ M'�ar, o,,`e7 and ?Dove file n111n Der SnOwn 'J1' til.`_.'
tentative Tr'iaL,
lhls 10= w'ouLd Rave UOtentla_ for rurthe ' developlTle•::t.
A" IiOw' diversions. shalII
t_ DC deVelOpeii aS SOWT_. o1: the tenta.iV e 1113'
In adcition, the fo_io14�i11g Silall be p='0'.'lde
' I
I
�.. An adequate aca'._ityl shall be provided a_ the end o-- Bandito Way
to allow the QIOO fi'ow to escape from the street .into the deter-
tion basic: without the flooding of domes,
i
B. Raise Stone Valley Road grade south of Black Derringer Drive su=-
ficientiy to ensure jthat the required diversions along Black:
Derringer will flow into the basin, not southerly on Stone Valley
Road.
instal an adeqI
uate diversion facility at the cast cno of li 1 ack
:
Derringer Drive to divert- all tile Q100 flow from The southeriy
drainage area into tihe northerly drainage area to the sat .is
of the Public Works Department.
I
D. Construct all diversion facilities adequate to mass the Q100 flow,
(Pipe. flow -for Q10' aild sur-face flow for the remainder.
i
j Zile watershed areas lying easterly of Lots 80/100 (Black Derringer
Drivel shall ,have their flow diverted to the creek area lying IOC--weer
Bl,1c.k Derringe: Drive and Bu ,ale Range Road. The Q10 flow steal_ be
carried in a culvert,. The remaining waters from the Q100 -flow may
flow overland.
i
I .
23, Tne subdivider shall prol!lUc the 1'10011 Control District wink a rlpiht 0`
I entry to dispose oi excess basin excavation. it the area south of Lot-r
84 and 85.
i
24 . if the Flood Control Dlstrlct . constructs a regional detention basin on _hc
site shown on the map, t'he subdivider sha.11 par-iciilate in the ^os_ o_ the
detention basin, in all amount equal to 14 .441 all::
engineering Costs. Tills' amount will not exceed $135,380. 00 regardless o
the actual COs:. lr, addia-ion, the developer shall. deed to the Flood Control
District 2 . - acres of land lying within the detention basin area and encompas-
sing tile control structure.
i ;I
1- purchase o` land anc1 COnstructioP. 0` Fi detention basin is not und:':'Iti'1'..' or
C01111ri.tt.cli by the Flood '�011t.rol DlSt ic-L wlthln three years 01this al)1)'0
or at the t'i.mc. O fil4.111. l, O the ,' inal Mars 'For the i�rccn V,allc_% 1ZoucL' 1)l"asc
Oi til Sllbdi%'!Si011, whiClhCVC7 COC-UrS i:-5t, VIC Sllb111.VidCr Shall :
I
I
r,. 1,onStruCt a f100C water detelhtlOn baSlll 0� SuiflClent S1Ze t0 reSUit
1P. n0 increase iii the -low rate (QiOCi maximum in Greer, `'al Ley Cnck
Uow'nstrealil Of tike subdivision as F. reSu!L Oi the deve'loumellt.
i
I SI11)(1 V I I M
(I 1,;I I I 1 112 C., P.;Is om e n i o i 11 C 11) y Cl) 0IM1.;I t4.SA 1)f", CIl^ 11;1 1 1)
Ul I L ZI 1)1)U,-_C111,1 1)1: S r U C Z U r c.zz
Orlli r c a` o r
I,-0 U' 0 SLIC11 a 'Oun�- rvicc A
al.
maintcnancc oa: n e b asir. anci 1,uarnntcc -its in a I I c i a I La b i I C,
7-Yro"C10C tilt 11CCeSsarY rull-115 !1SUCII, aS c5tablishling a tax rate
c:el. n r
2511, Should tile construrtion! of Sub6iVi-SiOn 5026 be subscoucilt to thc Con-
struzrioli 07o Ill i)I ctiol-.. n-�_-o. adiaceileac'-cnr
d SUDUivisiol) Stects" the
I subdivider of SubdivisipT) S026 sh.all provide for adequate temporary
I protection of the road 'connections and for advance signing of the
construction area.
2415 [11`16 2- M',ill I i)C 1'11-:; SCLI to III i Il i Im]III
216 The bui ldimi I wi 6 s on l,o'jL..1
elevation 590. 0 ill 01-aCT to proviLIC L)rotectioll froll', the PMP (PI-C)bable
Maximum Precipi.-Lation� !s T o rim
27 1 A minimum distance of 140 feet shall be maintained between the southeriy
1 lot lines of Lots 246, !247, 248 and the northerly top oF slope line for
-
Lots 59, 60, 61 and 62 In addition, a 25-foot wide t-emporary caonst-iur
I tion casement shall be lProvided southcrly of said top of Slope line to
I prevent the construction .of structures, etc. , that might be damaged as
a result of excavation ;operations for the impervious core foi- the deten-
tion basin dam. The temporary construction easement- shall remain in c-_Tez*,
until tno constructi n 0 iof t'lic core ; s completed or un!- , jure, 1986,
ever is sooller.
218 A road -right-of-wny s h a!1 I be s 1)o%rn oil the Final N-1.11) t.-O T1170VJJLIC _F01- ;)II.–Cess
from 1Y'i.16 Stallion Road to Greets ':alley Road. The road may be privat(, 01-
dedicated to the. publics. file right-of-way width shall be' 40 fe'et.
'See condition #41. )
29 A 16-fDot wide paved emergency access road shall be constructed
within
the 40-foot right-of-waj/ between Wi-ld Stallion Road and Green Vallev
Road. (See condition #41. )
30. ' Sewage disposal serving' this subdivision shall be provided by the Cer,t:al
Contra Costa Sanitary District, Each individual living ui,.--.t snail be
se-parare sewer connect
SCLV-G ) a -i on. The sewers 1D-cated w` thJn the
boundaries of this subdivision shal " become an interrnl part of the
n Uosta Sai,,iitnry Dist)`i.zt ' s scwc-.-;i11c col 1cc,.- I_oi%. ;N,s-,.C I II
31. 1 Vhitcr SLP)j)1.y bC the F.as-. Municipni Utility District.
•
illdi.VidLlai livill.� ullit S' i I,,I I I be scl-Ved by a scilar"Itc colillcoz1al'L.
im'.ntcd thj :�
5UDCII.ViS10111 shall bCC01II' all 1)
intcC,—L1.1 "Irt 0:, the EIst Bay Mullicipal
utility District ' s overall water distribution systclil.
it
32 Comply with the Of the DInvillc Firc DIStrict . Tho size ;11)(1
design ol, tile water supply and loc.:;tion of Firc hvciralltt5 Will be 6,ctCr1y,.;IlCd
by the Danville Fire District ' s review the final pians ,
i
I '
I -
(,l)'IILiiLloil SLt)r /11)1)COv;I.,' - ,S(il)l; LV1511)I:' )'Ii�U !`la
L'
I
I
i
. 'i 1ho OeVC. loncr tillaaoil11)1., 15'iti'. T.II S:lr: Ra1110)i Iln]_.LC JIIOo] I!' S
�)oilcy ;=S i= rC:u._ to iC011_r1DU_]0:1 GI TUM-1c. TOr tlh^. qCV' 1C1)IiI:T ` OT
011001 raC.11;-L 0S. W1=171n :ll c C=, 'Tlhc Sall Ramon l,ailcv Uniile(:
School DlstriC.t ''Develop^'" s Pol1 '.'v'',
34. PhaSillr; of., (icve101)nlent is approved -Fort11rcc Llilit Sub) cC_ t i'C1/.L Cit
i
and moth.:i.Cation b%., tilc� Pianninry Dir .Cctor.
35. j Prior to ii.'!ink file i'iMO Subdiv; si:oll Mai, plans be slli)llii L-tCCr t0 til '
nlanniii Department fol' 'housc numbcriny alld O1)prov:ls of strCC_ 71all)C5
30, I Prior to the _`inal Subdivision Mar, for the first phase, F1 ri.(ing and
Ill.ning trail casenlcllt across the 1VeSte:1)' 1)ort1011 01 t11C (]CVC 10T.1n1Cn_ 10:.2t0IJ
! at approximate-1v the SO(; Toot elovatior. contour as shown oil file 'lent;ll.lve t aL' ,
S:lail be OTfercE TOr deUlcatlOn t0 the East Bay Regional r3rF: Distric=.
I
I
37 .1 Prior to :i lily the Finlll Han for the fiI S_ phase -Ind in, :ll:"i.h^:ance o
Condition +122 Of the Preliminary Dcvelopmcnt Plan (i787-RZ'1 for expansion
cf t'jt. Diablo Mate I'ar}: , thee arcs: o: En1mO11S Canyon at the nortilca;= 1)ortl0lh
Oi the development, the: westerly I)011lldarV OT LV111C1h 11eS On the S011thlVes',: Side
c rine Ridge [.t about. the 1 ,000-foot elevation contour pro-iect southeast and
cnc0111p ss1ng an. area OT'; not less tlla.11 60 Acres, s' all l 'OC Otic,^r'U TOT uC(1].�;It1011
to the Stade Dz,'i)artmen-_'l c5 Parks ane, Recreation.
I
i
3S. Final delineation of the expansion of Mt. Diable State Part: tc include the
Emmons Canyon area and the provision of riding and 'hiking trails for =he
East Bay Regional Pari` District, shall be shown on the Final Subdivision.
Map. These proposals will satisfy 251'. of the requirement for pari-: land
dedication within the development of 500 square feet of "sand area per
dwelling unit. Park dea"ication fees will be 75'' of the amount. normally
applicable.
i
39. . if durinc; the constl't1Ction, graU'inf Or excavation, any item,- of potential
11'_StOr1Ca1 Or SClelltlT interest are discovered, the County, Plannin;_'.
Department shall be notified. The nlannino Director snal.1 have the
authOrl_V t0
issue all Order appealable to the P1annlnlp COmm1SS101,:, tC,
Stop 1ti'Orr: lli the are.i Of ail)' =1nU })e]ldlllh L'Cr1TlCatiOii O tile CI1sCGVC:'l'
and the development of 1TI�t1l0US for elle protection ane :rcatlncnt of arcas
of Slhlll:lcant lntcrest .i
40. !`.1;110 (. li)1.1'', 41':)1' till;! ' 1 b6 (I,ourl.1' 1141!1111".1111f( ::Illi till:': ; hC' COP.:;';'.':!CL:C;I ;1
COntlTll:a_ton of Stolle. 1:';.1,' Icy RcU to the "T at til^" tlio
i
cul-do-Sa: Sections 0: Miner Cabir, Way. The radia_ Connectiol? -c til`'
cu:-Lie-sac bulb Stolle Valley RL)Lid shall bc• cIimiIla ted.
41. : The CC&RS. shall include !the following:
(a) Maintenance by the homeowners of the access road from Wild Stallio
Read to Greer. Valley Road.
00.ir it i or,S for Approval - 6division 5026 Page 6
(b) The gate CDPIStrUCC,te6 bv the deVEIDDer across th-a- emergency acceS�L
shall be maintainer in good condiby the ho-,,Ieo�-ne7s,
(cThe properties or.' the west side of green Vallev Road shall be
maintained with -round cover.
(d) S-Deec DUMDS or other obstructions, shall not he installed on the
private roads within the subdivision.
42. The developer shall- comply
with the agreement reached with the San Ramon
Valley Unified School ;District as outlined in the letter to Hr . Allen J .
Petersdor-f-, Superintendent dated March 17, 1978 and signed by Harold W.
Smith, President, I
BiT:dh
2/14/78
V17/78
-3/17/78
3/22/78
S! RAMON VALLEY AREA PLANNING COP SSIOfV
CONTRA COSTA 'COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
i 1
BRYAN;AND MURPHY" ASSOCIATES (;Applicants) - HAROLD SMITH (Owner),
County File #3011-77: A request for approval of a Final Development Plan to
create 3,09 residential units on 621.4 acres in a Planned Unit District (P-1j. Subject
property;is located at the northerly terminus of Stone Valley Road and is crossed by
the upper portion of Green Valley Road, in the Alamo/Danville area. (CT 3462)
I
On February 22, 1978 having been fixed as the time for hearing on this item,
the meeting was declared open by the Chairman.
Staff presented the staff report, described the project and explained the location.
Staff recommended approval with.conditions.
! The following persons appeared to represent and in favor of the application and in
opposition:
i
i (This was heard in conjunction. with Subdivision .5026 and the hearings recorded in detail
on that application.) .
HAROLD SMITH, 2076 ;Mt. Diablo Blvd., Walnut Creel:, CA presented the application.
I
! STEPHEN L. LEA VELLI, 1808 Piedras Circle, Danville, CA, representative of the Board of
Directors of White Gate Homeowners Association, appeared in support.
PAUL GAZARIAN, 3211 Stone Valley Road, Danville, CA appeared in support.
DIANE RAE, 1107 Court Street, Martinez, CA, representing Amigos de Diablo, appeared in
support. I
i
JANA OLSON, 11500 Skyline Blvd., Oakland, Ca, representing East Bay Regional Park District,
appeared requesting' trails.
i
ROY OSMUNDSON, Fire Marshal, Danville, CA appeared in opposition because of the private
streets.
i
BARBARA MEISTRELL, 206 Austin, Alamo, CA, representing Alamo Improvement Association,
appeared requestingia continuance that they might study this further.
i.
RON CRANE, R-7 Community Services District, recommended Park fees, rather than credit
for land dedication!
i
DR. J. L. HIRSCH, 300 Diablo Road, Danville, CA, R-7 Service Advisory Committee commented
on the lack of communication between their organization and staff.
i
GEORGE McCULLEY, 1890 Green Valley Road, Danville, CA, speaking for residents on Green
Valley Blind, expressed many concerns of those residents and made recommendations.
EMMETT BURNS, Oak Glen Court, Danville, CA, expressed concern on soils conditions, slides,
etc.
I
(Continued page 2)
i
!
Upon the MOTION of Commissioner KENNETT SECONDED by Commissioner OLANDER
the application was approved subject to staff conditions (exhibit "A" attached)
by the following vote on March 22, 1978
I
AY-S: Commissioners - KENNETT, OLANDER, BEST, MEAKIN, BUROW, WRIGHT, YOUNG
NOES: Commissioners - NONE Anthony A. Dehaesus
A.Assis
' Pla ning
ABSENT: Commissioners - NONE
ABSTAIN: Commissioners - NONE
i
APPLICANT: Bryan and Murphy Associates, ATTEST:
1233 Alpine Rd. , Walnut Creek, CA 94596 E. ragdon
�:-OWNER: Harold Smith; 2076 Mt. Diablo Blvd., irector
°'i; Current Planning
w.X;,•.Wanu�t Creel;; CA 94596
"I -A N..NO.. 3011-.77
I
i
Bryan and Murphy Associates - P 3011-77 Paoe 2
i
i
!
I
BILL WIGGINTON, President, ENCEO, INC. , 2150 Shattuck Ave. , Suite 600, B erkelev_ , CA,
Soils Engineers for the project, ';reported on the soils conditions .and building sites.
BURTON E. MARLIAVE, Soils Geologist, reported .on stability- of building sites.
i
Upon the Motion of Commissioner Y:ENNETT, Seconded by Commissioner BEST, the hearing on
the E. IjiR. was closed but allow written comments to be received by 5:00 o 'clock on
March 1st, for responses by the staff on March 8th; secondly, continue t h e hearing
on the subdivision and development plan to March 22, by the following vote on February
22, 1978.
I AYES: Commissioners KENNETT, BEST, OLANDER, MEAKIN, WRIGHT, YOUNG
i
NOES: Commissioners NONE
j
ABSENT: Commissioners BUROW .
On Marcl 8, 1978, having been fixed as the time for responses to any written comments
on the E. I.P.. , the meeting was declared open by the Chairman.
Staff reported no written responses were submitted on the E.I.R. ; Alamo Improvement
Association indicated they had no further comments to make on the E.I.R. Staff recom-
mended they certify the Environmental Impact Report together with the responses that
were prepared and given to them at the last meeting, as being adequate.
There were no comments.
i I
Upon the Motion of Commissioner OLANDER, Seconded by. Commissioner BEST, they found the
Environmental impact Report adequate on Match 8, 1978 by the following vote.
i
AYES: Commissioners - OLANDER, BEST, WRIGHT, YOUNG
I
NOES: Commissioners ;- NONE
ABSENT: Commissioners '- BUROW, KENNETT, MEAKIN
I
.On March 22, 1978, having been fixedd -as the time for the continued hearing on this item,
the meeting was declared open by !the Chairman.
! i
Staff presented the staff report, and recommended approval with conditions.
i
HAROLD SMITH stated he had met with Alamo ImD_ rovement' Association. The conditions were
acceptable.
GEORGE McCULLEY, 1890 Green Valley Road, Danville, CA, representing the homeowners on
Green Valley Road Blind, was in favor of the development with certain conditions.
i
BILL GREISE, East Bay Regional Park District, agreed with the deletion of the 8' trail.
HANK CAPSTENSEN, Danville Fire District, stated they were essentially in .agreement with
the changes and conditions.
!
i
i
I
I
I
i
Bryan and NurDhv Associates - # 3.011-77. Page 3
i
ROIL CRANE, Chairman of R-7 Citizens Advisor* Committee, advised then° wou.lc comb_ romise
prom 1001 Dark dedication fees t0 75, .
It was pound that .he proposed development is consistent with the :general Plan.
I
I
I
Findings on the Environmental IM.Dact Report are on pile with Subdivision 5026
i
i
I
I
I
I
I
i
i
i
i
I
i
i
i
i I
I �
I
I
i
i
i
i
I i
i
I i
I
I i
i
I
I
i I
i
i
i
i
i
k)N`, ilk l\l'l I• ralllr;i.i ri�.,it
i
'III! ..� i ' . ill ii,:ti;�(i ill j'(11; 1' i i( piilcl:. 1' 1;:t C':I ..:C' c.,.
t ll,� l'l l .11 l p.p. I .'l iw- lltl •kiiiill" ry _i!. i 97;, . i l s P;ni s ;111111'()" ",�J ,.r.
1 hlvc d 1 rcu i on 1-or the 1'.1 rst p'hasu of the .prn j cot W i t may ho tlhai-
.. ;l(Id Lt I ona, un , t N w I ; i hy addW l.'hty l n ", , 1 dill1 c ;I rcn n r tho K i i ma
i
Control KICKWH hNnim kIIU'Wn ,.ilii W WNin wurn nuryicu A1i: 1. _ I .
i deLcrmincd. Any :cV'..sfn of the 1'l, n would have to be revicwed undc.
Inc nrovisiolls o1' the Onned Unit District ;l -1 ,1 hil& n revise: i' nal
Development 11Nn m;y A,': rcuuired
1 i
�1 I
..2.I Prior to the issuance of any building permit and/or }°rnding permit for
work on any lot, the proposed grading , location and design of the propose(,
residential buildings ap6 accessory structures to be located on that lot
shall be first submitted for review and approval by the County Plannin,[[
1 Director. The ,11p tol
be used to establish setback, yr
d mid height
'I
dimensional requirements and other' provisions for development and use or
each lot shall be the S!incle p,i .. Residential Dis*rirr QS . The cWstcr
1 area designated Ior Ilpaitlo 1lomes" on Lots 151 through 234 shall provide
four" off-street parkin;; spaces and setbacks may be variable.
i
I .
JA minimum setback of 751 feet shall be maintained along the west side Ki
Green h,'alley Road for alp Ulllldlil's and structures an lots 301 through
309. A setback of less! than 75 feet can only be established by thc
approval of the Pla.nhin Director after considering off-street pal'kinr.
i
5 1 Development rights for areas to be established as common open space shill
be deeded to the Couniv. Tllis shall be Gone with tile. filing of the Final
Subdivision Nap for tile; common .arcn related to each phase or developumn,
subject to review and approval by the Planning Di.rcctor.
51 Covenants , Conditions il'1 Rcstrictlons , Articics of Illcorpol'ation and i•O-t.(Iws
j
for mandatory holTlcowihersl associations shall be submitted with the 1-iry
pnasc o'- the F:i.ilnl Subdivision Mnp, subject to review by the Plcinninq Director.
These documents .shall pi"ovide for establishment, ownership and maintenance nig
the common open space, private streets, and ag6cstrian nctivit.l.Cs and iacil i i.-ies.
i
b. Prior to' filing the Final Subdivision heap, a riding and hiking trail cascl1un ac-
cross the westerly portion of the development at npproximntcly tilt 800foot �'cvN -
contour snows on the AVitative Pial;, shall be offered for dedication to the Last
[Say Regional Park Distr'1Ct. The existing ridlng and hiking trail cascment
1 across the southeast eoriley of the development may be reverted to p= ivatc
use alld maintenance by elle homeowners ' association.
I �
( ,i Prioi" to filing -_'_"st phase of the =11121Subdivision Plap and in furtlhcrancc
i
of Condition U22 of the! Preliminary Development Plan (1787-RZ) for expansion o
Mt. Diablo State Park, the area of Emmons nnonCannon at file northeast porion c,
I
the dci'clopmcpt , the i,Sprcrir boun(inry of wwhichlies oil the sutitlii•;cst side of_
j PInc Ridge at about this l , (l00-1'out C:1 cvNt I (111 contour pro j eci soil hcl s_ and
_ncolill Nssing (ill, ilrca of! not i:ss than 0 acres , shall be oflcred ,"ay Ad1
tion to the State Dcpar:jmcnt of Parks and Rccrcation .
Ed Finn! Wine NO= of Ai' cxunns.ioN of Mt. Diablo Stntc Park .:o lllAudc
the l;iiiiiirns Cyn on area ' Ind the provision of riding and hiking t ro ils.' fo:
the East sial' Regional Q rk District , shall Uc shown on the Finn ! Subdi v i -
slon Map. These propos'nis will sNtlsfY the''.rcqu remelt for park land
dedication within the (1wcloi merit of 500 square feet of land arca ti^:•
dwellil'._' unit. No addiitionn! WHA arca For Dark pvginsrs or ir!- l ibn cm' ,
shall 11'_ roquirod.
d
'I
� I
REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM
li
(THREE (3) MINUTE LIMIT)
Complete this form and place it in the box near the speakers' rostrum before addressing the Board.
Name: ] Phone: - 2
AdA
Address I A-3 Z 7 15�- � �� _ City: &J,94jar
(Address and phone number are optional; please note that this card will become a public record kept on file
With the Clerk of the Board in association with this meeting)
I am speaking for myself or organization: _�dc� C:p ,
CHE K ONE: i
I wish to speak on Agenda Item # 2 _ Dater!
I �
My comments will be: General ❑ For ❑ Against
jl
❑ 1 wish to speak on the subject lof:
I
❑ I do not wish to. speak but would like to leave these comments for the Board to consider:
I i
Please see reverse for instructions and important information
II I
it
REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM
(THREE (3) MINUTE LIMIT)
Complete this form and place it ink the box near the speakers' rostrum before addressing the Board.
Name: _Ar �-�� K �� !i- Phone:
Address: t1 N� L
oZ � � � J� (�(J .�. _._ City: L-j 4 L61�� J C ��e
(Address and phone number are optional;please note that this card will become a public record kept on We
with the Clerk of the Board in association with this meeting)
I am speaking for myself or. organization: �.A�c1 I�.rnlc��c (CId+fZ�'� ze
II
CHECK,ONE: I r_)_I
❑ 1 wish to speak on Agenda Item # .� ' Dater l
li I
i i My cominents.will be: ❑ General ❑ For ❑ Against
I
❑ I wish to speak on the subject of: A ,2 S��
I I
❑ I do not wisli to speak but would like to leave these comments for the Board to consider:
I
I
I
Please see rev, erse for instructions and important information
I
I
li
I
REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM
i I (THREE (3) MINUTE. LIMIT)
Complete this form and place it in the box near the speakers' rostrum before addressing the Board.
i
Name: L 4 r Phone.
Address:; L��� ��1 M,>^13 DA _ City: Q Ld AAO
(Address and phone number are optional;please note that this card will become a public record kept on file
with the Clerk of the Board in association with this meeting)
I
I am speaking for myself_ or organization:
CHECK ZONE:
I wish to speak on Agenda Item #— _ Date: —.No
My comments will be: ❑ General ❑ For ❑ Against
❑ I wish to speak on the subject of:
I �
❑ I do not wish to speak but would like to leave these comments for the Board to consider:
Please see reverse for instructions and important information
i
REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM
(THREE (3) MINUTE LIMIT)
Complete this form and place it in the box near the speakers' rostrum before addressing the Board.
Name: � '} — Phone'
Address: City: C,+ -S
(Address and plrorre number are optional;pl ase mote that this card will become a publics record kept on file
with the Clerk of the Board in association w'h this meeting)
I am speaking for myself or organization:
CHECK ONE:
�p I wish to speak on Agenda Item # Date:
9K r-- f
jMy comments will be: General ❑ For ❑ Against
❑ I wish to speak on the subject'of:
❑ I do not wish to speak but would like to leave these comments for the Board to consider:
Please see reverse for instructions and important information
II
II
II I
II I
II �
Re: Permit anneal by William and Marie Parsons
li
Hearing Date: September 12, 2006
Before the: Contra Costa(Board of Supervisors
II
II I
I. I
Property Owners: Lawrence and Karen Leser
!I !
i 1485 Emmons Canyon Drive
Alamo, CA 945071
Permit Number: 374508
APN 193-660-01111
County File #Z 106— 11413
1 District III
II
II I
PIHOTOGRAPHS!! OF COMPLETED WORK,
PERMIT AND CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
II I
RECORD INSPECTION CARD
II i
II
II �
II .
Submitted by:
Ii I
Gumbiner & Eskridge LLP
Attorney for Leser
2121 North California Blvd. �I
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
9251-933-5800
I I j
I1 I
II
' I I
II
li
II I
II I
11 I
it
it
ORIGINAL-FILE > BUILDING PERMIT < BUILDING INSPECTION DEPARTMENT
Contra Costa County
j 651 Pine St.,3rd Floor,North Wing
Martinez,CA 94553-1295
PH: (925)646-4108/FAI25)646-
INSPECTION SCHEDUL G: (925)646-4108
Parcel#..........: - 60 011 Job Address: 1485 EMMONS CANYON DR AL
Permit#...... . 374508 Building Combo Today's Date: 0 - 6
Type of Perm • AD SINGLE FAMILY ADDITION Date Applied: 09/28/2005
Date Issued: 04/04/2006
Applicant's Name: GARCIA DEVELOPMENT Telephone: 925-935-1964
Owner's Name: LESER.LAWRENCE&KAREN Contractor: GARCIA DEVELOPMENT
Owner's Address: 1485 EMMONS CANYON DR Address: 112 WARWICK CT
ALAMO CA ALAMO,CA
94507-2856 94507
Zoning: P-1 Lot No.: No.Stories: 0 No.of Units: 0
Work Description: ADDITION OF MASTER BATH AND MASTER CLOSET 202 SQ.FI.PER PLANS
Valuation Calculation Information:
Occupancy Type Factor Sq Feet Valuation
Dwellings Addition 92.40 202 $18,664.80
Totals. . . 202 $18,664.80*
Permit Fee Details:
Item# Description , Account Code Tot Fee Paid Prv. Pmts Cur. Pmts
100 Building Permit 3420/9090 274.75 274.75 274.75 .00
110 Plan Check Fee 3420/9090 1781.59 178.59 178.59 .00 \'
130 Energy Surcharg 3420/9090 113!34 113.34 113.34 .00
142 Elec Addition - 3420/9090 62!25. 62.25 62.25 .00
152 Plum Addition - 3420/9090 62:25 62.25 62.25 .00
162 Mech Addition - 3420/9090 62125 62.25 62.25 .00
170 Community Devel 3420/9110 256:04 256.04 256.04 .00
199 Clean Water Fee 3445/9090 28100 28.00 28.00 ' .00
22G Earthquake - 8303/0800 1!87 1.87 1.87 .00
350 Flood Zone - #F 3415/9090 30100 30.00 30.00 .00
Tof A Fees: $1,069.34 Total Paid: $1,069.34 Total Due: $0.00
Licensed Contractors Declaration:
I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury that I am licensed under provisions of Chapter 9(Commencing with Sec.7000)of Division Pf the Business and Professions Code,and my license
is in full force and effect. q
License Class: ?? License#: Contractor
Owner•Builder Declaration:
I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury that I am exempt from the Contractors License Law for the following reason(Se 031.6,of the Business and Professions Code states Any cityor
county which requires a
permit to construct,alter,improve,demolish,or repair any stn.roture,prior to its issuance,also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he or she islicensed
pursuant to the provisions.
of the Contractors License Law(Chapter 9 commencing with Sec.7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code)or that tie or she is exempt therefrom and the basis for the
alleged exemption. !
Any violation of Sec.7031.6 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a Civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars($500).
1,as owner of the property,or my employees with wages as their sole compensation,will do the work,and the structure is not intended or offered for sale. (Sec.7044 Business and
Professions Code:
The Contractors License Law does not apply to the owner of a property who builds or improves thereon,and who does such work himself or herself or through his or her ownemployees,
provided that such
improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If however,the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion,the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he or
she did not build'..
or improve for the purpose of sale.)
.1,as owner of the property,am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project(Sec.7044,Business and Professions Code,states that the Contractors;:. .:'
License Law does not apply to
an owner of property who builds or improves thereon,and who contracts for such projects with a contractor(s)licensed pursuant to the Contractors t:ease Law).
-I am exempt under Se:. B.&P.C.for this reason:
Date: Applii ant:
Workers Compensation Declaration:
I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations:
I have and will maintian a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers'compensation,as provided for by Sec.3700 of the Labor Code,for the performance of the work for which
this permit is issued.
I have and will maintain workers'compensation insurance,as required by Sec.3700 of the Labor Code,for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My workers'
compensation carrier
andpolicy number are:
Carrier: Policy#: Expires:
_ I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued,I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the workers'compensationlaws
of California,and
and agree at if'
sh I b me subject to the workers'compensation provisi of Sec. or Code,and I shall forthwith comply with these provisions.
Da [7 Appli,
WA N1NG: Fa lure t secure workers'compensation coverage is unlawfu an sat subject an emp oyer to criminal penalties and civil fines of up to one
hundred thousand dollars($100,000),in addition to the cost of compensation, a ges as provided for"in Section 3706 of the Labor Code,interest,and
attorney's fees. ! l
Construction Lending Agency:
_I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued(Sec.3097,Civ.C.).
Lender's Name: Lender's
Address:
I certify that I have read this applicati�andte that he bove infonnation is correct. I agree to comply with all city and county ordinances and state laws relating to
building construction,and hererby of this city to enter upon the above mentioned property for ins ection purposSignature of Applicant or Agen Dat
Building Dept.By: I - - Date:
Carlos Balt- ano,Director
I
i
I
' I
!
II 1
i
II I
it
II
CONTRA COSTA!COUNTY BUILDING INSPECTION
INSPECTION RECORD CARD
(See reverse.sideof this card for permit-specific information)
NOTICE AND WARNING: Do not cover any work until it has been inspected and approved. This card must be posted on
the job site, and'in a manner as to be visible fro Mi
the street. The card and the approved plans must be available for each
inspection, or the inspection will not be made.
II
Inspections may be scheduled by phone 6 a.m. to midnight, Monday through Saturday. Call 646-4108 and follow
instructions. Requests for same-day inspectionsare not accepted.
Permit fees are[set to provide for a limited number of inspections. A reinspection fee will be charged when a return trip is
necessary due :to the following: 1) Work not ready for the inspection called for; 2) Deficiencies found in the previous
inspection still Piot corrected, or new deficiencies were created; 3) Lack of access to the work to be inspected; 4) Lack of
approved planslor this card on the job site.
Insp Inspector's . I Insp Inspector's: :.Date-
Codes Initials Date Codes Initials = _
FOUNDATION ! INSULATION s
❑ Survey Cert. Recd Jf. 107 ❑ Underfloor Insul �
100 ❑ Set Backs 110 ❑ Framing Insul
406 ❑ Life'r,Ground i 117 ❑ CeilingInsul
101 ❑ PiersI PLUMBING
102 ❑ Forms 301 ❑ Ground Plumbing .
103 ❑ Slab Foundation 302 ❑ Water Service
125 ❑ Slab Garage I 303 f T Shower Pan Test '
604_ _❑ Driveway 304 ❑ Rough Plumbing
GRADING PERMIT INSP. 1 305 ❑ Undfl. Plumbing
600 ❑ Pre:Const. Insp I 306 ❑ Water Heater
601 ❑ Rough Grading 309 ❑ Gas Test
602 ❑ SUB/MS in Frog 310 ❑ T-Bar Plumbing
608 ❑ Gen Bldg Site/In Prog 1 312 ❑ Gas Meter Release
BLOCK/CONCRETE
MOBILE HOMES i 113 ❑ Fireplace/Rebar/Foundation
701 ❑ MH'Set-Up POOLS/SPA
703 ❑ MH'Accessory Insp 201 ❑ Site Check/Pregunite
707 ❑ MH'Permanent FD i 202 ❑ Bonding-Cavity,/Deck
720 ❑ MH!Final 203 ❑ Pre.-Final
STRUCTURAL I 204 ❑ Final-Pool
104 p ❑ Shear Nailing-Int MECHANICAL
126(} ❑ Shear Nailing-Ext til I 501 ❑ Furnace Compt
106 ❑ Underfloor . r� — % 502 ❑ Combustion Air -�--
108 ❑ Roof Deck Nail NL b 503 ❑ Rough Sheet Metal
109 ❑ Framing 1 7-1.3 c 504 ❑ Fire Damper
111 ❑ Firewall 506 ❑ Commercial Hood
127 . ❑ Drywall ! 507 ❑ Condenser(A/C)
114 ❑ Ext[Lath/Int Lath 508 ❑ T-Bar-Mech
115 ❑ Str,uctural-Misc/T-Bar I AGENCY APPROVALS
118 ❑ Wet Wall Iti ic ❑ Fire Dist UTL Fina[
123 ❑ Roof/In Progress 1 ❑ Pub Works UTL Final
124 . ❑ Wi'riClow Replacement ❑ Planning/CDD UTL Final
128 ❑ Fire Penetration ❑ San Dist UTL Final
ELECTRICAL i ❑ Env Health UTL Final
401 ❑ Power Pole ❑ Haz Mat UTL Final
402 ❑ Conduit/Underground FINAL INSPECTIONS
403 ❑ Service Entrance 120 BUILDING ►'n
404 ❑ Rough Elect 320 ❑ Plumbing
405 ❑ Bonding 420 ❑ Electrical
407 ❑ Restore Svice/90-Day 520 ❑ Mechanical
408 . ❑ T-Bar Elect . - 620 ` Grading/Drainage j-
L 409 ❑ Electric Meter Release 820 ❑ Disabled Access
II I
Other:
Comments:
I
II
EXPIRATION:; This permit will expire if work is not started within 180 days, or 180 days lapse between approved
inspections. If the permit expires before the work is completed and/or inspected, no additional work,shall be performed
until a new permit is obtained. Under California Law, uninspected work is a property defect and must be disclosed to the
next owner prior to transfer of title.
EXTENSION:i Prior to permit expiration and upon written request, a one-time extension, not to exceed 180 days, may be
granted. 1 1
REIMBURSEMENT: SB1815 states that a permittee is entitled to reimbursement of permit fees if the local enforcement
agency fails tdconduct an inspection of the permitted work within 60 days of receiving notice that the work is completed.
This ca Willi serve as Iertificate of Occupalncy/ Completion upon authorized signature.
Carlos 5611 a irector Authoriied Signature ate
S.clarks-di\P mit Car dI05-05
II
T:
" 57d xIl r � °i -•�,f �t�ii�t :� ~FI
'r ti: .yti i 'Y „„ _ I '•' .. '_� a-- IIF =a 'N:7.6 ..
p �i •5! 4_;Y I
rl,-_
MIM
pw
•i< rit
,dn.
:G� ±
i: - :,lj• ,i.
�7 .c'y�
5t:�
,
— Ali
;
'A...; .., r t�y6yl -±;"qj.',F= ':rM6.:3'z 1!?p'-i x`E;^4?:'•:: • .± y. ..
lk
22
i.y
b.I.-M.. .'lx '.f;.' '1.1 i`.iS':':Kiln.': .:.5.�v �yr
= : ,,
.:•�h�, i� �' :.:€',':;M1;::'...:Y3i':,rteol #
'1
✓:r
y :
A NO
Lr
I i
.�=:,:.;i•,: .iJ1. I I :�"..,-f':.,,.,::iFa..,�.r til" -` i'
Oza
- .,;r ;•',�: � 3.o- :-.1-'.`.
j%
-w-' `rqr, � ,. I1I�1 •^,r Yy i�1µrµ
.£:5:�::�a ��i rrY :.�':>�''i` '�I� .. / �� y;,.'i`•';Y� .s�::'�., 33rr��' ..r,.Y'
''1..` '}i� �'1•-' i•,7v,. `,�!:S,�V,A - ii�A...i '.YF!:t��!.:.�-��� _ -.iif'.•
Wk
Cl.
-�i:"• _ ��4?� .;Fd..: ..irct;'�`. .�iti°s ..Ik. .� ^t. c S
ikZ.w ,•1y?•,:' 3.J,���Q�,�,
•'lei !�' 1.:' f:
_ _ - .'.�'.Y T�,''^.i:'::" ':.±„!•:Jnr`.
':� r; :::c• .�^>;:.; � I � ":`fit.• I yf:y
,gyp
��.1 ® .Sr.
-1
.rt,.
S 7M,.°�! .:.... 6....... ...'1 .y. ... ... a �'1±, -4!';�,.:..?.'e,•�:'S".n:. 'Ft'i
.:s±.'.�.��F-,p� <,...:�,£y�•.•..;.,rY......':$- ...:.,• .:_.,>. i. - _ -.�.i":i?5�:..1 .�7,'?;; 3
�y
:,.f .,:..1:,: �°.r3q ^.::.P4v'vF_:.I.y,;...�,, ......_�.. .. .. _ :. P' .. .. _ ... ......',. ._ .�•.�,.�.L�: i+. .`!t.':v...x.. i;Yi:�
.`rte �_•-'
:.
i�
F•-`y'7 _ C `ufii- L:. ..t � y.{�*. C'�':nr?/>.My.dy"''°r" 1r� '-• r..-.�'..'. f,'," '�' +",•.•`
;�• ��a" f�='--"�'' .�.«;Z'tr,'�T,'ry'�- •' �}.. ,.dlt +,yy��,'� .��1`.'�S"'`?f�,�.y�y.�..4.^ �� �. .h� t''�'.:;.!.,;;• ,-.
c`-Y �%U+ `;�� .r d.. ;r'r:,r f �Y��"-',�.�K,:�x�}�'� t'Q' �i7:"`y�_-f'^. :✓
i/�
- ` ?�� /
r
/�
i )!
I �,_ � �,
L�
I `
+ 1
t'
/' �,'i./�.8e y��,
I':.: ..
�.M1
I ' ''''� 1� ,0 oe
I ,*��� �
J( }
+ c
i
�i� e�
�`