HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 11061984 - W.2 Contra
Costa
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS County
FROM: WATER COMMITTEE County
DATE: November 6, 1984
SUBJECT: Authorization of Statements for the Contra Costa County Water Agency
Specific Requests or Recommendations & Background & Justification
RECOMMENDATION
1. Approve statement for submittal to the State Water Resources Control Board concerning
the Triennial Review of the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento/San Joaquin Delta
on November 7, 1984.
2. Request staff to monitor the November 14, 1984 hearing of the Senate Agriculture and
Water Resources Committee concerning completion of the State Water Project.
3. Approve statement before the Assembly Water, Parks and Wildlife Committee concerning
the San Joaquin Valley Agricultural Drainage and the Kesterson Reservoir on November 16,
1984, to be given by Daniel Pellegrini , Chair, Fish and Wildlife Study Committee.
BACKGROUND
The State Water Resources Control Board is holding a hearing concerning the Triennial
Review of the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento/San Joaquin Delta and Suisun
Marsh. This is the second triennial review of the Plan and Decision 1485 which was promul-
gated in 1978. The attached statement calls for the setting of interim standards for the
Delta and Bay to protect the water quality and fish and wildlife resources.
The Senate Agriculture and Water Resources Committeee has scheduled an interim hearing on
the completion of the State Water Project. Based on past experiences, it is possible that
this hearing will be canceled. However, if it is not canceled, the Water Agency staff
should attend the hearing to monitor testimony presented.
The Assembly Committee on Water, Parks and Wildlife is holding a hearing concerning San
Joaquin Valley Agricultural Drainage and the Kesterson Reservoir to determine the roles of
various federal, state, and local agencies, and private entities in resolving the critical
problem of San Joaquin Valley drainage. The attached statement calls for consideration of
in-Valley alternatives and reiterates the County's position in opposition of discharge of
the San Luis Drain into the Delta.
Continued on attachment: yes Signature:
Recommendation of County Administrator Recommendation of Board Committee
Approve Other:
1 A !3/
Signature(s): �� � _,J0 �-
Action of Board on: 6 1904 Approved as Recommended ✓Other
Vote of Supervisors I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
Unanimous (Absent ) AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE
Ayes: Noes: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON DATE SHOWN.
Absent: Abstain:
DBO:cl - wc.bo.auth.statemnts.tll Attested N OV 6 19A4
Orig. Div.: Public Works - EC PHIL BATCHE , CLERK
cc: County Administrator OF THE BOARD AND COUNTY
ADMINISTRATOR
By ,
DEPUTY ERK
u�'n�ZJ
J
Statement of the Contra Costa County Mater Agency
Before the State Water Resources Control Board
Concerning the Second Triennial Review of the Water Quality Control Plan for the
Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta and Suisun Marsh
November 7, 1984
The Contra Costa County Water Agency has historically fought for adequate water
quality standards in the San Francisco Bay/Delta estuary system. The Water
Quality Control Plan and Decision 1485 are not adequate to protect the water
quality, nor the fish and wildlife values of the Bay/Delta system. This has been
evidenced by the decline of fish and wildlife resources and the fact that water
quality concerns still remain in the Delta.
The Contra Costa County Water Agency feels that the Water Quality Control Plan
and Decision 1485 should be revised immediately. New hearings should be opened
leading to interim standards for the Delta and the Bay pending completion of
various studies in 1986. The interim standards are needed to prevent further
decline of fish, wildlife and water quality. Although hearings are planned to
start in 1986, the actual revision of the Delta Plan and Decision 1485 may not be
completed until several years later. Interim standards are needed now to protect
the Bay and Delta until permanent standards can be adopted.
We acknowledge that information is lacking to set definitive standards on all
water quality parameters. However, we do feel that there is enough new information
to create some interim standards for the Bay/Delta system. Although appeals have
,been filed, the Superior Court decision on the Delta Plan and Decision 1485 calls
for such a reconsideration. At the minimum, the State Water Resources Control
Board should immediately set selected interim standards. Public hearings would
provide an opportunity to determine what standards should be adopted by the Board.
The State Water Resources Control Board also has existing authority to develop a
Water Quality Control Plan fro San Francisco Bay that would include standards for
Bay water quality. The Board should open hearings to establish interim standards
for the Bay, either together with the reconsideration of the Delta Plan or
separately. One interim standard that should be adopted concerns pulse (unregu-
lated) flows for San Francisco Bay. Documentation of the needs for these pulse
flows are found in the report of the four-agency Delta Outflow Study commissioned
by the Board (entitled: "Effects of Freshwater outflow on San Francisco Bay
Biological Resources," July 1983) . Interim standards should include minimum
pulse flows to stratify Central and South San Francisco Bay. Stratification has
been found to be important to biological resources in the Bay/Delta system.
Additional standards are needed to protect the fishery in the Delta. Standards
should be set to modify Delta export pumping schedules so that they will be more
Authorize by the Board of Supervisors,
Contra Costa County, Ex Officio Governing Board of the Contra Costa County Water
Agency.
000259
• zq
2
sensitive to fish migrations and the need to keep the habitat in the Delta
productive for biological life. Improvements also should be made to the fish !
screening and salvaging equipment at Clifton Court Forebay and at the Federal CVP
pumping plant.
Another factor that should encourage the Board to open hearings is the presence
of high levels of selenium in the agricultural drainage effluent from the San
Joaquin Valley. The San Joaquin Valley watershed drains into the Delta and Bay
and could be one of the causes for the decline of fish and wildlife and water
quality over the years. Further investigation is needed to determine what the
effects of selenium and other toxics, pesticides, and herbicides are on Delta
water quality. If possible, interim standards should also be set for these
pollutants.
The Contra Costa County Water Agency looks forward to cooperating with the State
Water Resources Control Board in developing adequate standards .for the Bay and
Delta system.
DBO:cl Nov. 1, 1984
WA.statement.swrcb.tll
00020®
OA-53F
Statement by the Contra Costa County Nater Agency
Before the Assembly Committee on Water, Parks and Wildlife
Concerning San Joaquin Valley Agricultural Drainage and the Kesterson Reservoir
November 16, 1984
Contra Costa County has been historically, and continues to be, opposed to
discharge of agricultural drainage from the San Joaquin Valley into the San
Francisco Bay/Delta estuary. Our main concern is that the Bay/Delta estuary not
be degraded any further. There are many misconceptions circulating that the Bay
and Delta are much healthier water systems than they were in the past. This
statement is not accurate. Although sewage and industrial discharges have been
improved over the years, the biological resources of the Bay and Delta have
significantly declined. Also, the water quality concerns that Contra Costa
County has had over the years still remain.
Discharge of agricultural drainage into the San Francisco Bay/Delta estuary is a
risk that should not be taken. We are concerned about the effects of toxics,
pesticides, heavy metals, and other drainage water constituents on water quality.
This concern was realized by the recent discovery of high levels of selenium in
the agricultural drainage water. There may be other drainage water constituents,
of which we are not currently aware, that could have major detrimental impacts on
the Bay/Delta water quality.
It is also important to look beyond the immediate topic of the San Luis Drain.
Further investigation should be initiated as to whether or not agricultural land
in the San Joaquin Valley can be economically farmed. The changes in water
pricing due to the 1982 Reclamation Reform Act and the cost of treating/disposing
of drainage effluent should be considered into the cost of producing crops in the
San Joaquin Valley. Additionally, the need for the crops grown in the San
Joaquin Valley, in light of agricultural surpluses and subsidy programs, should
also be thoroughly evaluated. We may come to the conclusion that, after taking
into consideration all cost factors, both economic and environmental, that it is
not to society's Fest interest to farm portions of the San Joaquin Valley.
Taking marginal land out of production will reduce the amount of agricultural
drainage generated and also reduce the water requirements for the San Joaquin
Valley.
Desalinization of drainage water in order to recycle water and produce energy
from solar brine ponds should be thoroughly investigated. We understand pre-
Presented by Daniel Pellegrini, Chair, Contra Costa County Fish and Wildlife
Study Committee, on behalf of the Board of Supervisors, Contra Costa County, Ex
Officio Governing Board of the Contra Costa County Water Agency. Authorized by
the Board of Supervisors on November 6, 1984.
000261
j
2
liminary research has found that this option may be cost-effective compared to
discharge into the Bay/Delta estuary. Desalinization also has the benefits of
not creating potential problems in the Bay/Delta, system and providing a new
source of water and energy for the San Joaquin Valley.
In summary, we recommend that the Legislature advocate that the following action
take place:
1. That local government (county level ) be included in the study team that will
coordinate the various investigations into the San Joaquin Valley agricultural
drainage options.
2. A comprehensive look at the economics of farming in the San Joaquin Valley
be undertaken to determine the true costs of irrigated crops.
3. A full analysis of in-valley treatment and disposal alternatives be considered
before discharge into the San Francisco Bay/Delta estuary be considered.
Contra Costa County looks forward to working with the Legislature on this very
important issue.
DBO:cl
WA.statement.16nov.tll
06026