HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 08132006 - C.30 .. .. FE-.L
--.TO:---. .:!BOARD--OF-SUPERVISORS---
-- _
FROM: MAURICE M. SHIU PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
Costa
atii. jx C . 3o
v'k t
DATE: . June 13, 2006 �a: - � •�"
Sp'q.COUtYf4 County
i
SUBJECT: I;
APPROVE Master CooperativeAgreement for the 2006 West Contra Costa Transportation Advisory
!'Committee Subregional Transportation Mitigation Program; FIX Public Hearing for July 18,2006,
V for Adoption of Urgency and Regular Fee Ordinances; West County area.(Districts I and II)
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
I. Reco II mended Action:
1. APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the County Administrator, or designee, to execute the Master
Cooperative Agreement-for the 2006 West Contra Costa Transportation Advisory Committee
.(WCCTAC) Subregional Transportation Mitigation Fee Program.
2. FIX a Public Hearing for July 18, 2006 at 9:30 a.m. to consider adoption of an urgency ordinance
land a regular ordinance to establish Subregional Transportation Mitigation Fee Program Fees to fund
the revised Subregional Transportation Mitigation Program for WCCTAC.
3. .DIRECT the Clerk of the Board to Publish the Notice of Public Hearing in compliance with Section
6062a of the California Government Code.
.4. DIRECT the Public Works Director to mail notice of hearing in compliance with Government Code
Sections 54986 and 66017.
Continued on Attachment: ® SIGNATURE:
[RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ❑ RECOMME i'DATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
['-APPROVE' OTHER
SIGNATURE( )S
liL �—�
ACTION OF BO RD ON GG7J(/
APPROVED AS WCOMMENDED Kr OTHERI ❑
I.hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an
action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of
Supervisors on the date shown.
VOTE/�F SUPERVISORS ��
UNANIMOUS(ABSENT Ale 7-.,e�, ) �
AYES: l NOES:
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTESTED: ��'�'�� A3,-ZAI-0 io
BL.je III JOHN CULLEN, CIerk of the Board of Supervisors and
G:\GrpData\TransEng\AgB\WCCTAC\BO-WCCTAC Approve Master Coop Agreement.
Orig.Div:Public works(TE) County Administrator
Contact: BriaLouis,313-2245
c: PWA ccounting–C.Raynolds
PW Eng'.Srvs.–T.Torres
PW Trans.Eng.–C.Lau
County Auditor/Controller $y Deputy
County Il'reasurer/Tax Collector —�
P
l' I
II
it I
-- S-UBJECT-:—�IAP-PROV-E-Master Cooperative Agreement-for-the 2006 West Contra-Costa-Transportation Advisory.. -- . ..
Committee Subregional Transportation Mitigation Program; FIX Public Hearing for Adoption of
Urgency and Regular Fee Ordinance; West County area. (Districts I and H)
DATE: !June 13, 2006
PAGE 2
i
II. Finanlciallmpact:
�I I
Adoption of the ordinances will result in the collection of fees from new developments to fund subregional
transportation improvements within the West Contra Costa Transportation Advisory Committee fee area.
There wbe no impact to the General Fund.
Fill
III. Reasos for Recommendations and Background:
II
The SubIregional Transportation Mitigation Program (STMP) was first adopted by the West Contra Costa
=o,
rtation Advisory Committee(WCCTAC),the Cities of El Cerrito,Hercules,Pinole,Richmond,and
Contra Costa County,and the Contra Costa Transportation Authority(CCTA)in 1997,by way of
a Cooperative Agreement and local ordinances. The program consisted of developer fees in the amount of
$700 (per residential unit, $560 per multi-family residential unit, and $.20 per square foot for
commercial/industrial/office space. The fees charged were considerably lower than what would have been
allowed by the nexus analysis. [Califomia legislation requires, among other things, that fees on new
developments bear a reasonable relationship (nexus) to the cost of the public facilities, or portion of the
public;facilities attributable to the developments on which the fee is imposed. California courts have]ong-
used the reasonableness standard or nexus to evaluate the constitutionality of exactions,including developer
fees.] The three projects that were partially funded in the 1997 program were: the Highway 4 West divided
highway, the El Cerrito BART Parking Structure, and the Richmond Intermodal Station.
I I
INFORMATION ON THE PROGRAM UPDATE
The updated STMP program is a 25-year program. ABAG s Projections 2003 provided the growth
projections in households and employment for West County. These statistics and standard trip generation
rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Handbook-allowed the consultants to
estimate the total increase in peak hour trips in the morning commute period(28,571 trips). Richmond and
Hercuies account for more than 75 percent of the new trips. The following table shows the growth in new
a.m. peak hour trips in the next 25 years (2005 to 2030) for the West County jurisdictions:
Richmond 58.5%
j Hercules 18.1%1
Pinole 7.8%
EI Cerrito 5.6%
San Pablo 5.2%
II Rodeo-Crockett 4.8%
A list lof projects needed to accommodate future traffic was prepared by the WCCTAC Technical Advisory
Committee(TAC). Eleven projects are currently on the list. In general,because most projects mitigate both
existing and future deficiencies,the amount of STMP funding varies from 27.5%to 50%of the project cost.
The consultant team includes a firm that specializes in studying the relationship between the impacts of the
new(growth and the fees proposed.
II1
II �
II I
1
---SUBJECT-:l APPROVE-Master-Cooperative-Agreement for-the-2006 West Contra CostaTransportationAdvisory---
1 Committee Subregional Transportation Mitigation Program; FIX Public Hearing for Adoption of.
ii Urgency and Regular Fee Ordinance; West County area. (Districts I and II)
DATE: i1 June 13, 2006
PAGE 113
UPDATED PROJECT LIST
I
The are-
eleven projects recommended by the TAC (and the STMP funding amount) are:
1. IRichmond Intermodal Station $15,000,000.
2. I Interchanges on I80 at San Pablo Dam Road and at Central; and on Highway 4 at Willow -
1$14,280,000.
3. Capital Corridor Improvements (Hercules train station and track/safety improvements) -
$13,255,000.
4. I(Ferry Service from Richmondi and/or Hercules/Rodeo -$12,650,000.
5. (BART access and/or parking 'improvements - $25,330,000:
6. Bay Trail Gap Closure - $1,510,000.
7. San Pablo Dam Road Improvements in Downtown El Sobrante - $1,900,000.
8. San Pablo Avenue Corridor Improvements - $1,650,000.
9. I N. Richmond Road Connection Project-$4,000,000.
10. i Hercules Transit Center Relocation - $1,650,000.
11. I Del Norte Area Transit Oriented Development Project—6,875,000.
Project numbers 6, 7,and 8 are located in the unincorporated West Contra Costa County area,which would
benef t from these improvements. Specific project descriptions can be found in the attached program update.
There are a diverse range of projects represented,and many of the projects are also funded by Measure J-the
renewed transportation sales tax measure in Contra Costa County. With the recent shortfall in transportation
funding, the developer fees will help to make up funding gaps.
li
POTENTIAL FEES AND REVENUES
I'I
In 1997, the nexus analysis showed that WCCTAC could legally establish fees at a level (i.e. residential at
$2,345 per dwelling unit) that would generate a total of $24.5 million over 13 years; however, the
established fees were set lower(i.e. residential at $700 per dwelling unit) and it was anticipated that S5.1
million would be raised over the lifelof the program (1997 to 2010) at the reduced fee level.
I�
If the(full fees justified by the updated nexus analysis are approved by WCCTAC and the other member
entities,the updated program would 'generate approximately$98 million over 25 years. The proposed fees
are:
Single-family residential $2,595
Multi-family residential $1,648
Senior Housing $701 per dwelling unit
III Hotel $1,964 per room
Retail/Commercial $1.82 per square feet
1 Office $3.51 per square feet
Industrial $2.45 per square feet
Storage Facility $0.53 per square feet
I 1
i
li
SUBJECT: 'APPROVE of Master Cooperative Agreement for the 2006 West Contra Costa Transportation
lAdvisory Committee Subregional Transportation Mitigation Program; FIX Public Hearing for
Adoption of Urgency and Regular Fee Ordinance; West County area. (Districts I and H)
DATE: ;June 13, 2006 j
PAGE 4
it
(Church $1.58 per square feet
Hospital $4.21 per square feet
'Other $3,507 per AM peak hour trip
ii
The above WCCTAC STMP Fees are subject to annual adjustment. An additional administrative fee equal
to 2% of the program revenue will be assessed by the County.
II I
In order,to implement the new WCCTAC STMP fee schedule, it is necessary for the County and the other
member agencies to adopt new ordinances or resolutions. Staff recommends that the Board fix a pubic
hearingl for July 18, 2006 at 9:30 a.m. to consider the adoption of an urgency ordinance and a regular
ordinance implementing the WCCTAC STMP fees.
I
It was determined by the Board of Supervisors at the April 11, 2006 board meeting, that the WCCTAC
STMPlii ate activity is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The Notice of
Exemption was filed with the County�(Clerk on April 12, 2006.
l l
Ij
IV. Conselguences of Negative Action:
'I
Failure�to fix the hearing date to consider adoption of the ordinances could delay implementation of the
ordinances and result in loss of fee revenue, and would. be inconsistent with the intent of the Master
Cooperative Agreement, which established the WCCTAC fee program. In addition, the developer
contribution for subregional improvement projects is necessary to comply with the concepts of the County's
Growth Management Program which requires new growth to fund the additional infrastructure capacity
required to serve that growth. The Gr6wth Management Program became a requirement with the passage of
Measure "C" which was approved by the voters in 1988.
II
I I
I I �
II
I l �
li
l l
I
II I
li I
ii
it I
it
II l I
e
MASTER COOPERA TIVE A GREEMENT
B!YAND AMONG THE
CONTRA COST, TRANSPORTATIONAUTHORITY
THE CITIES OF EL CERRITO, HERCULES,PINOLE, RICHMOND,AND SAN P.ABLO,
THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA
AND THE
WEST CONTRA COSTA TRANSPOR TA TION AD VISOR Y COMMITTEE
FOR THE 2006 SUBREGIONAL TRANSPORTATION MITIGATION FEE PROGRAM
This AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of this I9 day of C 4rp L , 2006,
by and between the Contra Costa Transportation Authority, a local transportation and
improvement authority organized under the provisions of California Public Utilities Code
Section 180000 et seq., hereinafter referred to as AUTHORITY; the cities of El Cerrito,
Hercules,Pinole, Richmond, San Pablo, and the County of Contra Costa, collectively referred to
herein as SPONSORS; and individually as a SPONSOR, and the West Contra Costa
Transportation Advisory Committee, a Joint Exercise of Powers Agency organized pursuant to a
Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement among the cities of El Cerrito, Hercules, Pinole, Richmond,
and San Pablo, the County of Contra Costa, and the transit agencies AC Transit, Bay Area Rapid
Transit District, and Western Contra Costa Transit Authority,hereinafter referred to as
WCCTAC. The AUTHORITY,•SPONSORS, and WCCTAC shall sometimes be referred to
collectively herein as the "Parties" anid individually as a"Party".
RECITALS
WHEREAS, AUTHORITY, SPONSORS, and WCCTAC,pursuant to the Contra Costa
Transportation Improvement and Growth Management Expenditure Plan and Ordinance
(referred to herein as "Measure C") adopted and approved by the voters in 1988, and pursuant to
the extension of the transportation sales tax (referred to herein as "Measure J") adopted and
approved by the voters in November 2004, hereby desire to enter into a Cooperative Agreement
for transportation improvements in West Contra Costa County to be funded in whole or in part
by developer fees collected under the West County Subregional Transportation Mitigation
Program ("STMP"). The 2006 program (the "2006 STMP") is intended to supersede the original
STMP adopted in 1997 (the"1997 STMP"). The transition from the 1997 STMP to the 2006
STMP is outlined herein. This Agreement shall terminate and supersede the prior Master
Cooperative Agreement Between Contra Costa Transportation Authority, the Cities of E1 Cerrito,
Hercules, Pinole, Richmond, and San Pablo, the County of Contra Costa and the West Contra
Costa Transportation Advisory Committee, dated September 17, 1997; and
WHEREAS, each SPONSOR by local ordinance or resolution, enacted the STMP, which levies
a fee ion new development to mitigate the impacts of new trips generated by that development in
conformity with the Mitigation Fee Act (Gov. Code §§ 66000 et seq., referred to herein as the
"Act'P; and
WHEREAS, the 1997 STMP partially funded three projects —Highway 4 West, the El Cerrito
Plaza BART Station Parking Structire, and the Richmond Intermodal Station Facilities
Enhancement Program; and
i
Page 1 of 17
i
WHEREAS, fees from the 2006 STMP are proposed to partially fund the following eleven
regional transportation projects (collectively referred to herein as the "Projects" and individually
as a"Project"):
1. Richmond Intermodal Station(WCCTAC; Richmond Community Redevelopment
Agency)
2. Interchanges on I-80 at San Pablo Dam Road and Central Avenue, and on
Highway 4 at Willow Avenue (Authority);
3. Capitol Corridor Improvements: Hercules Passenger Rail Station (City.of
Hercules) and capital improvements along the:corridor(WCCTAC; Capitol
Corridor Joint Powers Authority);
4. Ferry Service from Richmond and/or Hercules/Rodeo (WCCTAC; Sart Francisco
Bay Area Water Transit Authority, Cities of Richmond and Hercules);
5. BART Access and/or Parking Improvements (BART; WCCTAC);
6. Bay Trail Gap Closure (WCCTAC; East Bay Regional Park District);
7. San Pablo Dam Road iI provements in downtown El Sobrante (Contra Costa
County);
8. San Pablo Avenue Corridor Improvements (WCCTAC Cities/Contra Coster
County);.
9. North Richmond Road Connection Project (Contra Costa County);
10. Hercules Transit Center Relocation (City of Hercules); and
11. Del Norte Area Transit-Oriented Development Project Public Improvements (City
of El Cerrito).
WHEREAS, the nexus findings, in conformity with Government Code section 66000 et seq. can
be found in the 2006 STMP, including the "Project Nexus Discussion" for each project; and
WHEREAS, the designated lead agency for each project in the 2006 STMT ("Project Sponsor")
is listed in parenthesis in the above list (with participating agencies listed after the lead agency
and v
WHEREAS, this Agreement outlines the roles and responsibilities of the Parties relative to the
administrative, fiscal, and project management of the 2006 STMP projects; and
entity for the program, and will coordinate
WHEREAS, WCCTAC is the primary responsible
and administer the STMP expenditures, the priority for fee disbursements, and provide general
management of the STMP consistent with its mission;and
I
Page 2 of 17
WHEREAS, WCCTAC has evaluated the components of the 2006 STMP and finds that the
establishment, imposition, collection, transfer and use of development fees for the purposes and
Projects described herein are necessary to mitigate traffic impacts caused by new development
and authorized by all applicable legal.authorities;
NOW!THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the Parties hereby agree as follows:
A. PURPOSE
The purpose of this Agreement is to formalize the institutional arrangements for the
collection, oversight, and expenditure of the 2006 STMP fees and the close out of the.
1997 STMP program.
B. CLOSE-OUT OF FEE COLLECTION AND EXPENDITURE FROM THE 1997
STMP
Fees will no longer be collected for the Highway 4 West,the El Cerrito PIaza BART
Station Parking Structure, and ithe Richmond Intermodal Station Facilities Enhancement
Program projects as of the Effective Date.
1. Fees collected and unspent for the Hi&way 4 West project shall be spent no later
than December 31, 2006.
2. Fees collected and unspent for the El Cerrito Plaza BART Station Parkin.
Structure project shall be spent no later than December 31, 2006; or the funds
may be transferred to the Del Norte Area Transit-Oriented Development Project
in the 2006 STMP for design, engineering, and/or environmental activities.
3. Fees collected and unspent for the Richmond Intermodal Station Facilities
Enhancement Program project shall be spent no later than December 31, 2006;.or
the funds may be transferred to the Richmond Intermodal Station project in the
2006 STMP fordesigri, engineering, and/or'environmental activities.
C. FEES
I. Imposition of the Fees.. In order to fund the 2006 STMP, SPONSORS shall
consider the adoption; by ordinance or resolution,the following developer fees, to
be payable at the time of issuance of building permits:
LAND USE FEE
Single-Family Residential $2,595/DU*
Multi-Family Residential $1,648/DU
Senior Housing $701/DU
Hotel $1,964/Room
Retail $1.82/SF**
Office $3.51/SF
Industrial $2.45/SF
Page 3 of 17
Storage Facility $0.53/SF
Church $1.5 8/SF
Hospital $4.21/SF
Other $3,507 per AM peak
hour trip
*DU=Dwelling Unit **SF=Square Feet
The fees for uses not listed above shall be determined by the SPONSOR
collecting the fee according to information generated by appropriate traffic studies
or other means of determining traffic impacts as approved by WCCTAC, or in
accordance with the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Manual.
2. . Tribal Gamin Facility Developments.
The Parties agree that a tribal gaming facility's subregional traffic impacts should
be mitigated and that WCCTAC shall be included in any evaluation and
detennination of such impacts and their mitigation. Monies to pay for mitigation
of such subregional impacts may be governed by a tribal-state compact or a tribal-
local agency agreement. The collection of any such monies shall be subject to
applicable state and federal law, including but not limited to the Indian Gaming
-and RegulatoryAct, 25. U.S.C. §§ 2701-2721.
3. Transfer of the Fees.
No more than thirty(30) days following the close of each calendar quarter endil.12
after the Effective Date, all STMP fee revenue collected by a SPONSOR will be
transferred by the SPONSOR.to the City of San Pablo with a brief Quarterly
Report that describes the revenue and any fee reduction(s) granted by the
SPONSOR. The City of San Pablo shall deposit the funds into a separate interest-
bearing capital facilities account for the STMP revenues to be used solely for the
purposes described heljein, and in the fee resolutions or ordinances adopted by the
SPONSORS pursuant to this Agreement,. The revenues, including any accrued
interest from the accoiult, will be disbursed and expended only for the eleven
projects identified in S-ection D below.
4. Project Sponsors; Oversight Responsibilities.
i. WCCTAC is r I sponsible for the oversight of. (1) the Richmond
Intermodal Station project; (2)Ferry Service from Richmond and/or
Hercules/Rodelo; (3) the Bay Trail Gap Closure project; and (4) the San
Pablo Avenue Corridor Improvements.
ii.. The AUTHORITY is responsible for the oversight of the Interchanges on
I-80 at San Pablo Dam Road and Central Avenue, and on Highway 4 at
Willow Avenue.
;
Page 4 of 17
iii. The City of Hercules is responsible for the oversight of the Capital
Corridor Improvements at the Hercules Passenger Rail Station and the
Hercules Transit Center Relocation.
iv. The San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District is responsible for the
oversight of BART Access and/or Parking Improvements.
V. Contra Costa County is responsible for the oversight of the San Pablo
Dam Road Improvements in downtown El Sobrante and the North
Richmond Road Connection Project Public Improvements.
vi. The City of El Cerrito is responsible for the oversight of the Del Norte
Area Transit-Oriented Development Project.
5. Reports.
Pursuant.to•Government Code section 66006(b)(1), within 150 days after the end
of each fiscal year, the City of San Pablo, in cooperation with the Project
Sponsors, shall make available to the public and to SPONSORS a status report on
the progress attained and costs incurred to date on each Project in the 2006
STMP, including but not limited to:
i. - A brief description of the type of fee in the account or fund.
ii. The amount of the fee.
iii. The beginning and ending balance of the account or fund.
iv. The amount of the fees collected and the interest earned.
V. An identification of each public improvement.on which fees were
expended and ithe amount of the expenditures on each improvement,
including the total percentage of the cost of the public improvement that
was funded with fees.
vi. An identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the
public improvement will commence if the local agency determines that
sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing on an
incomplete public improvement, as identified in paragraph (2) of .
subdivision (a) of Section 66001 of the Government Code, and the public
improvement remains incomplete.
vii. A description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the account or
fund, including the public improvement on which the transferred or loaned
fees will be expended, and, in the case of an interfund loan, the date on
which the loan will be repaid, and the rate of interest that the account or
jfund will receive on the loan.
Page 5 of 17
'I i • •
viiia The amount of'refunds made pursuant to subdivision(e) of Section 66001
and any allocations pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 66001.
I�i6. Report Reviews.
Pursuant to Government Code section 66006(b)(2), SPONSORS shall review the
information contained in the report referenced in Section C.5 of this Agreement at
the next regularly-scheduled public meeting not less than fifteen (15) days after
this information is made available to the public.
7. Periodic Findin.f-,s.
Pursuant to Government Code section 66001(d), after the fifth fiscal year
following the first deposit of 2006 STMP revenues and every five (5) years
thereafter, WCCTAC shall make all required findings with respect to that portion
I� of the fee account or fund remaining unexpended, whether committed or
uncommitted, held by the City of San Pablo on its behalf. Such findings shall be
made in connection with the release of public information required by
Government Code seition 66006(b) and Section C.5 of this Agreement.
8. Fee Adjustments.
A provision shall be included in the fee resolutions or ordinances adopted by
SPONSORS pursuant to this Agreement, requiring automatic annual fee increases
or decreases, effective July 1 of each year after 2006, based on the percentage
I� change in the Engineering News-Record Construction Cost Index for the Sar,
Francisco Bay Area for the 12-month period ending with the June index of the
same calendar year.
9. Exemptions.
Developments shall be exempted from the 2006 STMP and the development fees
pursuant thereto if(1) the development has obtained rights vested prior to the
effective date of the applicable 2006 STMP fee ordinance or resolution, pursuant
to Government Code section 66498.1 or(ii)has entered into an agreement with a
SPONSOR that expressly excludes the assessment of additional fees.
i� 10. Credits.
A developer may receive credit against fees for the dedication of land for right-of-
way and/or construction of improvements for specific 2006 STMP projects. where
such right-of-way or construction is beyond that which would otherwise be
1 required for approval of the proposed development. The calculation of the
amount of credit Iagainst fees for 2006 STMP dedications or improvements shall� be based upon a determination by SPONSOR that such credits are, in fact,
exclusive of the dedications, setbacks, improvements, and/or traffic mitigation
I� measures which are required by local ordinance, standards, or other practice. In
addition, the credit shall be calculated based upon the actual cost of construction
II Page6of17
of improvements or, in the case of land dedication, on an independent appraisal
approved by the SPONSOR.
D. LIST OF PROJECTS
I�
1. Richmond Intermodal Station. .Public improvements mcludmg, but not limited to:
the parking garage, staiion building, transit center, east side improvements,
lighting and real-time transit information.
112. Interchanges on I-80 at San Pablo Dam Road and Central Avenue; and on
Highway 4 at Willow Avenue. Upgrade and improve the interchange at 1-80/San
Pablo Dam Road, including provisions for bicyclists and pedestrians; enhance
operations and vehicular, bicycle, pedestrian safety in the vicinity of the
interchange. Modify and realign the interchange and ramp at I-80/Central Avenue
and/or other improvements to improve access to 1-80 and I-580 from Central
Avenue. Relocate and1 realign ramps at Willow Avenue to meet current standards
'I for improved local access and freeway movements.
!I 13. Caitol Corridor Improvements. Parking, station platform, signage and plazas,
rail improvements, etcl., at the Hercules Passenger Rail Station and/or track
improvements, drainage, fencing, safety improvements and/or other
improvements along the Capitol Corridor line in West Contra Costa County.
4. Ferry Service to San Francisco from Richmond and/or Hercules/Rodeo. New
ferry service utilizing high-speed vessels and funds for capital improvements such
as terminals, landside improvements, parking, lighting, transit feeder service,
signage, etc.
5. BART Access and/or Parking Improvements: Parking, aesthetic, and/or access
improvements, station capacity improvements, sidewalks, lighting/restroom
renovations, bicycle storage, expanded automatic fare collection equipment, etc.
at the El Cerrito Plaza, El Cerrito Del Norte, and/or Richmond BART stations.
6. Bay Trail Gap Closure. Close gaps in the Bay Trail in West Contra Costa County,
' including, but not limited to the following: (1) the one-mile gap along the
Richmond Parkway between Pennsylvania and Gertrude Avenues; (2) the 1 .8
mile gap north of Freethy Boulevard to Payne Drive in Richmond; (3) the two-
mile gap from Payne Drive to Cypress Avenue in Richmond; (4)the one-mile gap
from Pinole Shores to Railroad Avenue in Pinole; and (5) the 1.8 mile gap from
Railroad Avenue to Parker Avenue in Hercules.
7. San Pablo Dam Road Improvements in Downtown El Sobrante. Traffic calming,
additional signals,pedestrian improvements, turn lanes, etc. that are identified in
the Downtown El Sobrante Transportation and Land Use Plan (and subsequent
documents).
I�
JAI I
J Page 7 of 17
�I
I
8. San Pablo Avenue Corridor Improvements. Infrastructure improvements on San
Pablo Avenue through West Contra Costa County within a half-mile radius of San
Pablo Avenue in either direction and/or San Pablo Avenue SMART Corridor
I
improvements.
9. North Richmond Road Connection Proiect. Extend Seventh Street northward to
connect to an eastward extension of Pittsburg Avenue in North Richmond.
I10. Hercules Transit Cente'r. Relocate and expand the Hercules Transit Center on the
east side of Highway 41
111. Del Norte Area Transit Oriented Development Project Public Improvements.
Parking facilities; bicycle, pedestrian, and/or bus transit access improvements;
signage; lighting; improvements to station access or station waiting areas;
improvements required under the Americans with Disabilities Act; improvements
to adjacent streets, strelet crossings, or signals; and/or Ohlone-Greenway
improvements:
E. I'FUNDING COMMITMENTS AND ELIGIBLE COSTS
I
I1. Use of Fees.
I!
Fee revenues shall be available for Project costs through completion of
construction. Costs include,but are not limited to, environmental clearance,
l conceptual planning and engineering, traffic studies, design, right-of-way
acquisition, utility relocation, and costs of construction. Funding amounts are in
j 2005 dollars and actual funding commitments will depend upon the 2006 STMP
fee revenues collected by the SPONSORS. Eligible Project costs will be
determined by WCCTAC based on the cost criteria listed above and other factors
consistent with applicable law, in WCCTAC's sole discretion. Project costs will
be reimbursed pursuant to procedures determined by WCCTAC. Projects will be
funded in accordance with Project readiness and other factors as determined
pursuant to and as reflected in a Strategic Plan to be prepared in accordance with
Section F below. I
I 2. STMP Projects and Funding.
Il
Project Name STMP Funding
Richmond Intermodal Station $15,000,000
I-80 Interchanges at San Pablo Dam Road and $14,280,000
Central Avenue; Interchange at Highway 4/Willow
Capitol Corridor Im rovements $13.25 5,000 .
it Ferry Service from Richmond and/or Hercules/Rodeo $12,650,000
BART access and/or;parking improvements $25,330,000
j� Bay Trail Gap Closure $1,510,000 I
l San Pablo Dam Road Improvements in Downtown El $1,900.000 j
Il
IliPage 8of17
I�I
I ' �
� I
Sobrante
it San Pablo Avenue Corridor Improvements $1,650,000
North Richmond Road Connection Project $4,000;000
�i
Hercules Transit Center Relocation $1,650,000
Del Norte Area Transit Oriented Development $6,875,000
F. (PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
(Subject to environmental clearance, right of way acquisition and dedication, utility
relocation, and other factors (the timing of which may be beyond the control of
IAUTHORITY, SPONSORS, and/or WCCTAC), and subject to the availability of
II regional fee and other funding sources as may be required,the following implementation
guidelines shall apply to projects in the 2006 STMP:
1. No later than nine months following the date of this Agreement, WCCTAC shall
adopt a Strategic Plan that determines the full Project scope and description,
prioritization, and implementation of the 2006 STMT Projects.
12. The Strategic Plan shall take into account the following: Project readiness; the
availability of full funding, including funds from sources other'than STMP fees;
the status of pre-construction activities (planning, design, engineering,
environmental); right-of-way clearance; community support for the Project;
Project need; etc.
G. ADMINISTRATIVE OVERSIGHT AND COST RECOVERY
1. The following parties shall be entitled to recover the following costs and
expenses:
I I
i. City of San Pablo. The City of San Pablo is entitled,to recovery of
reasonable administrative costs and expenses actually incurred, not to
exceed I% of the STMP fee revenues disbursed under this Agreement
during each quarterly period, to provide 2006 STMP financial and
accounting services, including but not limited to serving as the repository
of the STMP fee revenues and other funds collected under this Agreement
and preparation of quarterly reports with the amount of fee revenues
collected and the distribution of fees to the Projects.
ii. WCCTAC. WCCTAC is entitled to recovery of reasonable administrative
costs and expenses actually incurred, not to exceed 2% of the STMP fees
disbursed under this Agreement during each quarterly period to provide
the 2006 STMP services relating to or incurred in the performance of the
following duties. coordination, administration and oversight of Project
expenditures; determination of the priority of fee disbursements; provision
III of general management of the Projects; and preparation of the Strategic
Plan for the 2006 STMP.
SII '
Page 9 of 17
i Iii. Project Sponsors. For each Project over which a Project Sponsor has
responsibility for administrative oversight, a Project Sponsor is entitled to
recovery of reasonable administrative costs and expenses actually
incurred, not to exceed 2% of the STMP fees disbursed under this
Agreement during each quarterly period to provide the 2006 STMP
i services relating to or incurred in the performance of the following duties:
provision of Project oversight.and contract management.
H. I(TERM
The term of this Agreement shall commence on —" ' 2006 (the
"Effective Date") and shall terminate on December 31, 2036, unless terminated earlier in
accordance with the terms of this Agreement.
I. I!TERMINATION
This Agreement will remain in effect until the termination date stated in Section H.
above, unless terminated earlier by written agreement of the Parties. However, in no
event shall the Parties to this Agreement terminate this Agreement if such a termination
�I would conflict with, cause a default under or otherwise violate the terms or conditions of
any revenue bonds.
J. I INDEMNIFICATION
1. AUTHORITY shall defend, indemnify, save and hold harmless WCCTAC; the
cities of El Cerrito, Hercules,Pinole, Richmond and San Pablo; and the County of
Contra Costa and their officers, agents and employees from any and all claims,
costs and liability arising out of or in connection with any act or failure to act
under this Agreement; or breach of any term of this Agreement, by
AUTHORITY, except to the extent such claims, costs or liability arise from the
negligence of WCCTAC, El Cerrito, Hercules, Pinole, Richmond, San Pablo,
�I Contra Costa County or their officers, agents or employees.
I2. WCCTAC shall defend, indemnify, save and hold harmless AUTHORITY; the
I Cities of El Cerrito, Hercules,Pinole, Richmond and San Pablo; and the County
of Contra Costa and their officers, agents and employees from any and all claims,
costs and liability arising out of or in connection with an act or failure to act under
this Agreement, or breach of any term of this Agreement, by WCCTAC, except to
the extent such claims, costs or liability arise from the negligence of
AUTHORITY, El CeiInito,Hercules, Pinole, Richmond, San Pablo, Contra Costa
County or their officers, agents or employees.
3. El Cerrito shall defend, indemnify, save and hold harmless AUTHORITY:
WCCTAC; the citiesiof Hercules, Pinole,Richmond and San Pablo; and the
County of Contra Costa; and their officers, agents and employees from any and all
claims, costs and liability arising out of or in connection with any act or failure to
j� act under this Agreement, or breach of any term of this Agreement, by El Cerrito,
it I except to the extent such claims, costs or liability arise from the negligence of
�I
Page 10 of 17
it i
AUTHORITY, WCCTAC, Hercules,Pinole,.Richmond, San Pablo, Contra Costa
County or their officers, agents or employees.
4. Hercules shall defend, indemnify, save and hold harmless AUTHORITY,
WCCTAC; the cities of El Cerrito,Pinole, Richmond and San Pablo; and the
County of Contra Costa and their officers, agents and employees from any and all
claims, costs and liability arising out of or in connection with any act or failure to
act under this Agreement, or breach of any term of this Agreement, by Hercules,
except to the extent such claims, costs or liability arise from the negligence of
AUTHORITY, WCCTAC, El Cerrito,Pinole, Richmond, San Pablo, Contra
Costa County or their officers, agents or employees.
15. Pinole shall defend, indemnify, save and hold harmless AUTHORITY;
WCCTAC; the cities of El Cerrito, Hercules, Richmond and San Pablo; and the
County of Contra Costa and their officers, agents and.employees from any and all
claims, costs and liability arising out of or in connection with any act or failure to
act under this Agreement, or breach of any term of this Agreement, by Pinole,
except to the extent such claims, costs or liability arise from the negligence of
AUTHORITY, WCCTAC, El Cerrito, Hercules, Richmond, San Pablo, Contra
Costa County or their officers, agents or employees.
116. Richmond shall defend, indemnify, save and hold harmless AUTHORITY;
WCCTAC; the cities of El Cerrito,Hercules, Pinole and San Pablo; and the
County of Contra Costa and their officers, agents and employees from any and all
j claims, costs and liability arising out of or in connection with any act or failure to
act under this Agreement, or breach of any term of this Agreement, by Richmond,
except to the extent such claims, costs or liability arise from the negligence of
AUTHORITY, WCCTAC, El Cerrito, Hercules, Pinole, San Pablo, Contra Costa
County or their officers, agents or employees.
I I
7. San Pablo shall defend, indemnify, save and hold harmless AUTHORITY;
WCCTAC; the cities of El Cerrito, Hercules, Pinole and Richmond; and the
County of Contra Costa and their officers, agents and employees from any and all
claims, costs and liability arising out of or in connection with any act or failure to
act under this Agreement, or breach of any term of this Agreement, by San Pablo,
except to the extent such claims, costs or liability arise from the negligence of
AUTHORITY, WCCTAC, El Cerrito, Hercules, Pinole, Richmond, Contra Costa
County or their officer's, agents or employees.
8. Contra Costa County shall defend, indemnify, save and hold harmless
.AUTHORITY; WCCTAC; the cities of El Cerrito, Hercules, Pinole, Richmond,
I and San Pablo and their officers, agents or employees from any and all claims
j costs and liability arising out of or in connection with any act or failure to act
I, under this Agreement, or breach of any term of this Agreement, by Contra Costa
�1 County, except to thel extent such claims, costs or liability arise from the
tl
negligence of AUTHORITY, WCCTAC, El Cerrito, Hercules, Pinole, Richmond,
San Pablo, or their officers, agents or employees.
I�I
�I I
Page 11 of 17
- I I � •
19. WCCTAC agrees to the,fullest extent legally permitted to defend, indemnify and
hold harmless the Parties from any liability, loss, costs, and claims related to the
adoption or implementation of the 2006 STMP.. WCCTAC will pay any and all
1 legal costs incurred by any SPONSOR in any legal proceeding brought to collect
a fee, where the defense of such lawsuit raises the issue of the constitutionality or
legality of the fee.
K. PRIMACY OF THE DOCUMENTS
If a dispute arises, the terms o(this Agreement shall take precedence over the WCCTAC
Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement ("JEPA") and/or the model Ordinance Establishing
;the West Contra Costa Subregilonal Transportation Mitigation Program ("Ordinance").
L. 11ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION
. In General. This Paragraph L. establishes the exclusive process by which disputes
between or among the Parties to this Agreement concerning or relating to this-
j Agreement shall be resolved. The dispute resolution process established herein
shall apply to disputes ielated to the interpretation or enforcement of, or
compliance with, the terms and provisions of this Agreement. Disputes that are
not alleged to relate to jthe interpretation of, or compliance with, this Agreement
are not subject to this dispute resolution process.
12. Informal Conferral. 111a dispute arises as described above in Paragraph L.1 ., the
parties to the dispute (the "Disputing Parties") will first attempt to resolve it
through informal discussions, which may include designated'representatives of
the staff of WCCTAC AUTHORITY and SPONSORS, at their discretion.
Disputing Parties will 'advise the other Parties of the existence of a dispute and
coordinate the date, time and location of informal conferral.
3. Mediation. In the event a dispute cannot be resolved through informal conferral
within twenty-one (2 1) calendar days, the aggrieved Disputing Party, acting
1 through its governing body, shall give written notice to.all other Parties to this
Agreement, setting forth the nature of and basis for the dispute and facts
demonstrating that such Disputing Party is materially and adversely affected
thereby. The Disputing Parties, acting through their designated representatives.
including counsel, shall endeavor to settle the dispute by mediation. The
Disputing Parties shall, select a neutral third party with expertise in land use
matters to mediate the dispute. .The other Parties may, but are not required to,
participate in the mediation.
�I
4. Judicial Review. The dispute resolution process described above.shall be
undertaken in good faith and exhausted prior to resort to judicial review;
provided, however, that by agreeing to this dispute resolution process, no Party
hereby loses or waives its right to sue under any applicable statute of limitations
it or loses or waives its right to assert the operation of any applicable statute of
limitations as an affirmative defense. In the event that an applicable statute of
Page 12 of 17
I�
limitations would run during the pendency of the dispute resolution process
described above, the Disputing Parties shall agree in writing to toll such statute of
limitations for such period as may reasonably be necessary to complete the
dispute resolution process, but in no event shall such statute of limitations be
tolled for more than ninety(90) calendar days.
I
5. Conduct of Judicial Re-Lew Should any Party to this Agreement ultimately seek
judicial review of a dispute concerning or relating to the implementation,
interpretation or enforciement of, or compliance with, the terms and provisions of
this Agreement, all Parties will submit to the jurisdiction of a court of competent
!I - jurisdiction; provided, however, that the Parties shall cooperate in seeking the
appointment of a neutral Judge as defined in California Code of Civil Procedure
section 394 to sit in Contra Costa County Superior Court, to preside over any such
dispute.
116. Equitable Relief. Because the amount of damages in the event of a breach of this
Agreement may be difficult or impossible to determine, the obligations of the
Parties to this Agreement shall be enforceable by specific performance or other
equitable relief, in addition to any other available remedy.
I I
M. NOTICES
II Any notices which may be required under this Agreement shall be in writing,
shall be effective upon receipt, and shall be given by personal service, by certified
1 or registered mail, or by U.S. mail, to the City Clerks of the cities of El Cerrito,
Hercules, Pinole, Richmond, and San Pablo; to the Board Clerk for the County of
Contra Costa; and to the Executive Director of the AUTHORITY, and to the
individuals and addresses set forth below, or to such other addresses which may
be specified in writing to the Parties.
To WCCTAC: To City of El Cerrito:
13831 San Pablo Avenue 10890 San Pablo Avenue
San Pablo, CA 94806 El Cerrito, CA 94530
Attn: Managing Director Attn: City Clerk .
11
To City of Hercules: To City of Pinole:
111 Civic Drive �. 2131 Pear Street
Hercules, CA 94574 Pinole, CA 94564
Attn: City Clerk Attn: City Clerk
i1
To City of Richmond: To City of San Pablo:
1401 Marina Way South 13831 San Pablo Avenue
Richmond, CA 94804 San Pablo, CA 94806
Attn: City Clerk Attn: City Clerk-
Page
lerkPage 13 of 17
li
To County of Contra Costa: To the AUTHORITY:
651 Pine Street, lst Floor 3478 Buskirk Avenue, Suite 100
III Martinez, CA 945531 Pleasant Hill, CA 94523
Attn: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Attn: Executive Director
11 �
N. I!ADDITIONAL ACTS AND DOCUMENTS
iEach Party agrees to do all such things and take all such actions, and to make, execute
and deliver such other documents and instruments, as shall be reasonably requested to
(carry out the provisions, intent, and purpose of the Agreement.
�I
O. INTEGRATION
Except with respect to matters provided for in the JEPA and/or the Ordinance and subject
.to the primacy of this Agreement as provided in Paragraph K hereto, this Agreement
(represents the entire Agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof.
No representation, warranties)inducements, or oral agreements have been made by any
I� of the parties except as expresIsly set forth herein, or in other contemporaneous written
agreements.
Ii ,
P. III AMENDMENT
I
I This Agreement may not be changed,modified, or rescinded except in a written
instrument signed by all of the Parties. Any attempt at oral modification of this
1 Agreement shall be void and of no effect.
Q. INDEPENDENT AGENCIES
1. None of the agents or employees of the City of San Pablo shall be considered
agents or employees of the AUTHORITY, or the other SPONSORS.
2. None of the other SPONSORS' agents or employees shall be considered agents or
employees of the City,of San Pablo.
3. None of the AUTHORITY's agents or employees shall be considered agents or
employees of the City of San Pablo.
�I
R. ASSIGNMENT
I
II The Agreement, and the rights, duties, and obligations of a Party hereunder, may not be
assigned, transferred, hypothlecated, or pledged by any Party without the express written
I j consent of the other parties.
III
�I I
I
'I I
III
Page 14 of 17
11
I�
it
S. 11BINDING ON SUCCESSORS, ETC.
IlThe Agreement shall be binding upon the successor(s), assignee(s), or transferee(s) of the
AUTHORITY, the SPONSORS, or WCCTAC as the case may be. This provision shall.
not be construed as an authorization to assign,transfer,hypothecate, or pledge this
Agreement other than as provided above.
T. j SEVERABILITY
Should any part of this Agreement be determined to be unenforceable, invalid, or beyond
the authority of any Party to enter into or carry out, such determination shall not affect
the validity of the remainder of this Agreement which shall continue in full force and
effect; provided that, the remainder of this Agreement can, absent the excised portion, be
reasonably interpreted to give effect to the intentions of the parties.
U. jHEADINGS; RECITALS
jThe headings of sections, paragraphs and subparagraphs of this Agreement are included
for convenience only and shall not be deemed to constitute part of this Agreement or to
affect its construction. The recitals are intended to be, and shall be deemed to constitute,
part of this Agreement.
V. �I COUNTERPARTS
I� This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be an
original and all of which together shall constitute one agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be duly executed and
attested by their respective officers, duly authorized so to act, as of the date set forth in the first
paragraph of this Agreement.
City of Pinole I City of San Pablo
Mayor I Mayor
I,
ATTEST: ATTEST:
City (Clerk City Clerk
APP,ROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
I�I
City lAttomey City Attorney
r
IIS
i
r�I
Page 15 of 17
�I
li
I I
- Ilj
County"Iof Contra Costa West Contra Costa Transportation
li Advisory Committee
(::By: III
Chair, B r o Supervisors Chair
•ZG�G
ATTES : John Cullen, Clerk of the Board of ATTEST:
Supervisors and County Administrators
BY: I� Secretary
Deputy
A,PPRO v ED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Silvano; B. Marchesi
County Counsel
Legal Counsel
By: ill
Deputy
Contra Costa Transportation Authority City of El Cerrito
IIj
I , I
Chair� Mayor .
ATTEST:
Executive Director I
II I
Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Authority Legal Counsel j City Attorney
City olf Hercules City of Richmond
II
Mayor i i Mayor
ATTEST: ATTEST:
City;Clerk City Clerk
II ,
II it
Ij
I I Page 16 of 17
�I I
Ili
.... ... . . . ..
APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
II i
City Attorney City Attorney
i
i
828055v9;1812.003
�i
I
I
I;
j
li
d
i
i
li
i�
1
I
Page 17 of 17
.I I
.Ij
iI
= -
L
I I
I I
Ii 2005 Update of the
Subregional Transportation Mitigation
II Program (STMP)
j
I I
I
For the West Contra Costa .Transportation
II Advisory Committee (WCCTAC)
II
I I
I
II May 5, 2006
I I
I I
I Prepared by:
�I
TJKM Transportation Consultants
5960 Inglewood Drive, Suite 100
Pleasanton CA 94588-8535
Tel: 925.463.0611
II Fax: 925.463.3690
Ij
I
I I
I
Ij
�I I
2005;STMP Update for WCCTAC Page 1 of 20
TJKM Transportation Consultants May 5, 2006
I I
I j
1
j1 TABLE OF CONTENTS
I
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY......................................................................................4
INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................................................4
..............
SUMMARY.......................:...:. .......................................................................:......................................4
Chapter 2—Expected Growth In Households,Employment and Peak Hour Trips.................................. 4
i Chapter 3—Project List and Priori'ties......................................................................................................... 5
Chapter 4—STMP Previous Collections and Potential Yield From 2005 Update..................................... 5
Chapter 5—Program.Costs and Fee Calculation........................................................................................ 5
Chapter6—Nexus Findings.........1....................................................:.......................................................... 5
I
CHAPTER 2. EXPECTED GROWTH IN HOUSEHOLDS,EMPLOMENT AND PEAK HOUR TRIPS
IN'THE WCCTAC AREA....................................................................................:..............................................7
HOUSEHOLDGROWTH....................................................................................................................................... 7
EMPLOYMENTGROWTH..................... ............................................................................................................... 7
TRIPGENERATION .............................!............................................................................................................... 8
li
CHAPTER 3. SELECTION AND COST OF PROJECTS...........................................................................10
I
PROJECTDESCRIPTIONS................................................................................................................................... 10
1. Richmond Intermodal Station!......................................:...................................................................... 10
2. Interchanges on I-80 at San Pablo Dam Road and Central Avenue and on Highway 4 at Willow... /l
3. Capitol Corridor.......................... ......................................................................................................... 12
III 4. Ferry Service to San Francisco from Richmond and/or Hercules/Rodeo.......................................... l 2
5. BART Access and/or Parking Improvements..................................................................................... 12
1 6. Bay Trail.Gap Closure........................................................................................................................... 13
7. San Pablo Dam Road.Improvements in Downtown El Sobrante........................................................ 13
8. San Pablo Avenue Crridor Inil rovements......................................................................................... 13
9. North Richmond Road Connection Project......................................................................................... 14
10. Hercules Transit Center....... .......................................................................................................
j 11.Del Norte Area Transit Oriented Development project(public improvements)............................:.... 15
CHAPTER 4. STMP PREVIOUS COLLECTIONS AND 2005 UPDATE POTENTIAL FEE
REVENUES........................................!.............................................................................................................. 16
COLLECTIONSTO DATE................................................................................................................................... 16
iPOTENTIAL FEE REVENUES FROM 2005 UPDATE............................................................................................. 16
CHAPTER 5. PROGRAM COSTS AND FEE CALCULATION................................................................17
II(UPDATED COST PER TRIP ESTIMATE]................................................................................................................ 17
OTHER FACTORS IN STMP UPDATE.1............................................................................................................... 18
11 1
CHAPTER 6. NEXUS FINDINGS..!............................................................................................................... 19
III
CHAPTER 7. STUDY PARTICIPANTS.......................................................................................................20
TJKM TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS PERSONNEL................................................:.....................................20
�(•.THE REED GROUP............................ ............................................................................................................... 20
I PERSONS/AGENCIES CONSULTED/WCCTAC --TAC MEMBERS..................................................................... 20
.. 'II
�ii
it
I i �
I I
I
2005 STMP Update for WCC.TAC Page 2 of 20
TJKM Transportation Consultants May 5, 2006
II
• I.I.
II ,
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE I:HOUSEHOLD GROWTH IN WESTI CONTRA COSTA COUNTY-2005 TO 2030............................................. 7
TABLE II:EMPLOYMENT GROWTH IN WEST CONTRA COSTA COUNTY-2005 TO 2030......................................... 8
TABLE III:NEW A.M.PEAK HOUR TRIPSI IN WEST CONTRA COSTA COUNTY-2005 TO 2030...............................9
TABLE IV:STMP PROJECTS AND AVAILABLE FUNDiNG...................................................................................... 10
TABLE V:DISTRIBUTION OF FUNDS RECEIVED TO DATE...................................................................................... 16
TABLE VI:2005 COST PER TRIP ESTIMATE......:................................................................................................... 17
TABLE VII:2005 RECOMMENDED STMP RATES AND FEES AND FEES................................................................. IS
I I
I I
I I
I I
:I I
I�
I I
I I
-
I I
I I
Ij
II
I I
I I
I I
I I
II
I I
I I
I I
Ii
it
I I
2005 STMP Update for WCCTAC Page 3 of 20
TJKM Transportation Consultants May 5, 2006
II
I I
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY
Introduction
This analysis provides the technical basis for establishing the required nexus between-anticipated
future development in West Contra Costa County and the need for certain local and regional
transportation facilities. The specific tasks performed in preparing this analysis and their results are
summarized below. The West Contra Costa Transportation Advisory Committee's (WCCTAC)
Suliregional Transportation Mitigation Program(STMP) was established in 1997. This is the first
update of the STMP program to ensure that the various aspects of the program reflect current
conditions. For the 2005 STMT update,WCCTAC retained a team led by TJKM Transportation
Consultants to update technical aspelcts of.the program.
I
The 2005 STMP update includes anjupdated project list with cost estimates for all improvement
projects to be potentially funded by STMP fees.
This report presents the results of the efforts of the project team to update the WCCTAC STMP. This
update effort involved the major tasks described below.
1. The amount of new development that will occur in the WCCTAC area between 2005 and
j 2030 was determined.
2. A new estimate was prepared of the trip generation that will result from development of the
�. expected future land uses within the WCCTAC area. Trip generation rates from the Institute
of Transportation Engineers (ITE)publication Trip Generation were utilized.
3. Future deficiencies on the transportation network were determined based on findings of the
staff of WCCTAC, its member agencies, and the consultant team.
4. A list of projects needed to accommodate future traffic was determined.
5. Updated traffic improvement project cost estimates were prepared which reflect the latest
concept designs for the projlects and the latest completion status of the various projects.
6. An updated cost per trip wis calculated along with the corresponding updated STMP
j schedule of fees.
7. A reasonable relationship between the impacts of the new growth and the fees proposed in the
STMP was ascertained. State law requires that there must be a roughly proportional benefit
from the proposed fees to t e projects supplying the funds.
Summary
Chapter 2—Expected Growth In Households, Employment and Peak Hour Trips
According to ABAG's Projections 2003,the overall estimated growth in the WCCTAC area is
estimated at 17,910 households(a 20.3 percent increase in 25 years) and 28,810 jobs (an increase of
over 35 percent). Using standard available trip generation rates,the total increase in peak hour trips
in the a.m. period is expected to be 28,571. Richmond and Hercules account for over 75 percent of
the new trips.
JI
2005 STMP Update for WCCTAC Page 4 of 20
TJKM Transportation Consultants May 5, 2006
I�
• II
1i
-.. .._... ..._-._ Chapter 3--Project List-and Prioritii s - - - -- — - -
They recommended list of new transportation improvements to serve the WCCTAC area was
developed by the WCCTAC Technical Advisory Committee and the consultants. The WCCTAC
Board reviewed a preliminary list of projects in August 2004. The recommend list of new projects is
shown below. Costs and details of the individual projects are described in Chapter 3 of this report.
111. Richmond Intermodal Station
2. Interchanges on I-80 at San Pablo Dam Road and at Central and on Highway 4 at Willow
1 Avenue
113. Capitol Corridor capital and/or operational improvements
4.. Ferry service from Richmond and/or Hercules/Rodeo
.115. BART access and/or parking improvements
116. Bay Trail Gap Closure
17. San Pablo Dam Road improvements in downtown El Sobrante
1 j 8. San Pablo Avenue Corridor Improvements
9. N. Richmond road connection project
10. Hercules Transit Center relocation
1 11. Del Norte Area Transit Oriented Development project(public improvements)
The 11 projects have a total cost of$371 million. Of this amount, approximately$273 million is
anticipated to be funded by other sources or does not satisfy nexus requirements, leaving $98 million
for funding by the updated 2005 STMP..
1�
Chapter 4 STMP Previous Collections and Potential Yield From 2005 Update
The existing STMP was adopted in 1997. A total of near $2.942 million has been collected to date, or
about$39,200 per month. Most of the funds collected have been spent on the Richmond Intermodal
project and the Highway 4 West Project. The 1997 Nexus Analysis indicated that$24.5 million could
be Icollected for the next 13 years if the maximum fee amounts were adopted,but WCCTAC adopted
a fee that was lower by approximately 80 percent so that$5.1 million was the expected yield. The
adopted rates amount to about$440 per peak hour trip, instead of the $2,100 indicated by the nexus
study. If these same rates were applied to the expected growth in the next 25 years, the yield would
be $12.6 million with the lower rate's and$60.0 million with the full rates.
i1 I
Chapter 5-Program Costs and Fee Calculation'
Iii jupdating the cost per trip, the total costs of all proposed projects were determined and the outside
funding and non-eligible costs were subtracted to yield a total amount to be included in the program.
The program amount is $101,043,000, and when divided by the amount of peak hour trips generated
bye the new development, 28,810,the 2005 STMP cost per trip is.$3,507 if all projects were to be
fully funded. This figure is about 67 percent more than the $2,100 cost per trip determined in 1997.
A rate schedule is recommended to fund this full amount. However,WCCTAC may choose to
provide only partial funding of the project list. In 1997,the final fees were set to cover about 20
percent of the recommended program.
II
Chapter 6-Nexus Findings
California legislation requires that charges on new developments bear a reasonable relationship to the
needs created by,and the benefits accruing to that development. California courts have long used that
reasonableness standard or nexus to test to evaluate the constitutionality of exactions, including
li
11
I
2005 STMP Update for WCCTAC. Page 5 of 20
TJKM Transportation Consultants May.5, 2006
li
- —deaelopment fees-Based-on the-analysis included iri the body-of this report,-it-can be concluded-that- - -
the future development and the need for their associated improvements meet or exceed the basic
requirements set forth in Government Code sections beginning with 66000 to govern development
fees. �
I�
Of the$371 million worth of neededl improvements identified in this analysis, over$121 million in
outside funding sources have been identified. These outside sources primarily include Contra Costa
County Measure J, which is the extension of the one-half percent sales tax levied for transportation
improvements. Measure J,which is intended to fund improvements which will correct both existing
and future deficiencies,is a partner to the STMP extension, which by law must only fund future
transportation deficiencies associated with new development. Measure J was approved by Contra
Costa County voters in the general election on November 2,2004. Of the total deficiencies identified
inithe 11 proposed'STMP projects, only about 27 percent of the funding comes from the STMP. Over
$150 million worth of costs of the 11 projects fails to satisfy the nexus requirements and was not
i11
ncluded in the program.
I�
The methodology of this report ensured that only the portion of the projects included in the STMP
project list is necessitated by the growth in traffic between 2005 conditions and 2030 conditions.
Thus,there is a reasonable relationship between the proposed use of the STMP and the proposed land
use development projects on which the fee will be imposed. In the same manner there is a reasonable
relationship between the need for facilities included in the STMP and the proposed land use
development projects.
I I
I�
I�
I I
Ij
I I
Ij
I I
II
I I
I�
I
II
�I
I
I�
I I
2.005 STMP Update for WCCTAC I Page 6 of 20
TIJKM Transportation Consultants May 5, 2006
I�
. I
�I
CHAPTER 2. EXPECTED GROWTH IN HOUSEHOLDS,EMPLOMENT AND
PEAK HOUR TRIPS IN THE WCCTAC AREA
i
I I
Household Growth
I
ABAG's Projections 2003 was used to determine the residential and employment growth in the West
County area between 2005 and 2030 The growth in households for the WCCTAC area is shown in
Table I.
Tl el overall residential growth for the area is estimated at 17,910 households,representing a 20.3
percent increase for the 25 year period. Richmond is projected to have about 61 percent of the
residential growth, and Hercules is anticipated to have nearly 19 percent of the growth. Hercules will
be the fastest growing area,with a 50 percent increase in households in the 25-year period.
I I
TABLE I:HOUSEHOLD GROWTH IN WEST CONTRA COSTA COUNTY—2005 TO 2030
I
II � Households.
2005 I 2030 Growth Share of Rate of
Growth % Growth
EI Cerrito 13,160 13,650 490 2.7 3.7
Hercules 6,860 j 10,270 3,410 19.0 49.7
Pinole 10,700 .I 12,500 1,800 10.1 16.8
Richmond 43,640 1 54,590 10,950 61.1 25.1
Rodeo-Crockett 4,520 4,680 160 0.9 13.3
San Pablo 9,170 j 10,270 1 1,100 6.2 3.5
I.I Totals 88,050 I 105,960 1 17,910 100.0 20.3
Note: Forecasts are for each city's Sphere of Influence(SOI)except for the Rodeo-Crockett unincorporated area.
Kensington is included in the EI Cerrito SOI,Montalvin Manor and Tara Hills are in the Pinole SOI, N.
Richmond and EI Sobrante are in the Richmond SOI,and Rollingwood is in the San Pablo SOI.
I Source: ABAG Projections 2003
II
Employment Growth
Employment is expected to grow more rapidly than residential development. A growth of over 35
percent is forecast by ABAG for the WCCTAC area,representing an actual job growth of nearly
291,000 positions. Richmond will account for 57 percent of the job growth, with Hercules accounting
for about 18 percent. Hercules job growth rates are nearly 150 percent,while El Cerrito,Pinole and
Richmond are expected to register growth of around 30 percent. The Crockett-Rodeo unincorporated
area is expected to grow by nearly 60 percent. Table II summarizes the anticipated employment
growth in the WCCTAC area.
�I
II
�I
II
�I
�I 1
I I
2005 STMP Update for WCCTAC I Page 7 of 20
TJKM Transportation Consultants May 5. 2006
II ,
Ii
I
II
i
TABLE II:EMPLOYMENT GROWTH IN WEST CONTRA COSTA COUNTY—2005 TO 2030
II
Employment
2005 I 2030 Growth Share of Rate of
Growth % Growth
EI Cerrito 8,170 10,300 2,130 7.4 26.1
Hercules 3,430 8,490 5,060 17.6 147.5
II Pinole 6,110 7,920 1,810 6.3 29.6
II Richmond 52,390 68,750 16,360 56.8 31.2
Rodeo-Crockett 3,590 5,730 2,140 7.4 59.6
San Pablo 8,460 9,770 1,310 4.5 15.5
Totals 82,150 110,960 1 28,810 100.0 1 35.1
Note: Forecasts are for each city's Sphere of Influence except for the Rodeo-Crockett unincorporated area. See
Table I note for details.
Source: ABAG Projections 2003
II
The anticipated growth in households and employment in the WCCTAC area will result in new peak
hour trips on the transportation network. These are described in the next section.
Trip Generation .
Inl order to determine.the amount oftraffic that is associated with the expected new development in
the west county area,TJKM applied trip generation rates to the components of the new growth.
I
As in the original STMP, the 2005 update relies on the a.m. peak hour commute period as the primary
analysis period. The a.m. peak hour,period is used in order to not overburden the application of the
tralffic fees on retail development. While residential uses.and most employment based land uses such
as loffices and business parks have similar a.m. and p.m. peak hour trip rates,retail uses typically are
three to four times as heavy in the p.m. period as the a.m.period. Use of the a.m.rates for all uses
tends to spread the fee application more uniformly.
As noted above,there is expected to be a total of 17,910 new households in the WCCTAC area over a
25,-year period. Since some of these households will be in multiple family dwelling units and some
will be in single-family dwelling units, TJKM assumed an average of the trip generation rates for the
two residential land use types. The average a.m. trip rate of 0.63 trips per dwelling unit was applied
tol the total number of households to yield a total of 11,285 new residential-based trips.
I I �
For non-residential uses, a trip rate that is based on numbers of employees, and is representative of
various uses such as offices,business parks,manufacturing and retail uses in the a.m. period, was
selected. The rate selected was 0.60 trips per employee. When that number is applied to the 28,810
growth in employment over the 25 1 year period, the number of new a.m.peak hour trips generated by
these uses totals 17,286 trips.
These figures are shown in Table III. The table shows the total of the new a.m. trips from both
residential and non-residential growth, 28,571,and also shows the amount of the new trips that are
allocated to each of the WCCTAC agencies. Richmond growth is expected to generate about 59
percent of the new trips, Hercules about 18 percent and the other areas generally between about 5 and
10 percent. The contributions of other agencies are shown in the table below.
II
2005 STMP Update for.WCCTACI Page 8 of 20
TJKM Transportation Consultants May 5, 2006
II
II
II
. II
- -- — - ---i----T-ABI,E III:NEw-A:M:PEAK HOOUR-TRIPS-IN WEST-C-ONTRA C-OSTA COUNTY-2005-T0 2030 -- - - -
I I
New Peak Hour Trips Share of
From From Total Total
Households' Em to menti Tri s
j EI Cerrito 1309 1,278 1,587 5.6
. Hercules 2,149 3,036 5,185 18.1
11 Pinole 1,134 1,086 2,220 7.8
j I Richmond 6,899 9,816 16,715 58.5
j Rodeo-Crockett 101 1,284 1,385 4.8
i San Pablo 693 786 1,479 5.2
11 Totals 11,285 17,286 28,571 100.0
Source:TAM .
Growth in households from Table 1 multiplied by 0.63,the average a.m.peak hour trip rate for
single-family and multi-family dwelling units. The Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation,2003 Edition,is the
source of this information.
2Growth in employment from Table 2 multiplied by 0.60,a representative a.m.peak hour trip rate
for employment uses.
I
The amount of new trips is used in the calculation of the 2005 STMP update cost per a.m. peak hour
trip, as described in subsequent chapters of this report.
Ii
II
II •
li
I�
li
I I
I
;I I
I I
jl
;I i •
II
II
li
jl
'l l
I I
I I
II
•I i
2005 STMP Update for WCCTAC Page 9 of 20
TJKM Transportation Consultants May 5, 2006
I
ii
I
I �
I I
I.I.
J CHAPTER 3. SELECTION AND COST OF PROJECTS
II
The recommended list of projects to be included in the updated STMP is shown in Table N below.
The' projects are described in greater detail in the remaining portions of this chapter..
I�
TABLE IV:STMP I ROJECTS'AND AVAILABLE FUNDING
II
Project Tital Cost Measure J Other Unfunded RecommendedFunds Amount STMP
1.Richmond Intermodal station $36,000,000 $21,000,000 $15,000,000 $15,000,000
2.Interchanges on 1-80 at San
Pablo Dam Road and at
Central and on Highway 4 at 46,200,000 30,000,000 16,200,000 14,280,000
Willow Avenue.
3.Capital Corridor
j Improvements 48,200,000 7,500,000 3,000,000 37,700,000 13,255,000
4.Ferry service from Richmond 91,000,000 45,000,000 46,000,000 12,650,000
II
and/or Hercules/Rodeo
5.BART access and/or parking 92,100,000 15,000,000 77,100,000 25,330,000
improvements
I I
6.Bay Trail Gap Closure 5,490,000 348,000 5,142,000 1,510,000
Ij
7.San Pablo Dam Road
improvements in downtown EI 6,900,000 6,900,000 1,900,000
Sobrante
8.San Pablo Avenue Corridor 16,000,000 6,000,000 1,650,000
Improvements
9 N.Richmond road connection
project 7,950,000 7,950,000 4,000,000
1 10.Hercules Transit Center 6,000,000 6,000,000 1,650,000
relocation
11.Del Norte Area TOD 125,000,000 25,000,000 6,875,000
STMP Totals $370,840,000 $97,500,000 $24,348,000 $248,992,000 $98,100,000
II
Project Descriptions
I I
I,.I Richmond Intermodal Station
I1
The Richmond Intermodal Station/Transit Village is located in downtown Richmond. Other public
improvements (e.g. the center platform)have already been completed using state/federal/local funds
(approximately $22,000,000). Thei transit village is under construction and the housing on the west
slide is more than halfway complete. Funding is needed to complete the following public
it
�I
II
2005 STMP Update for WCCTAC Page 10 of 20
TJKM Transportation Consultants May 5, 2006
I I
I
�I
II
-- - —improvements:-parking garage;station-building,the-transit center,-and-public-improvements-on-the--- — -
east!side of the station.
II �
Cost: $36,000,000
Other Potential Funding Source(s): Private developer contributions, state/federal transportation funds
and'Measure J.
.li
Project Nexus Discussion: The total cost of this project is $36 million,of which approximately$21
million is funded by various sources Although in the WCCTAC area only 27.5 percent of future
traffic (see Chapter 6 for a detailed finding) is based on 25-year growth, in this case the project was
previously justified(in 1997)based mainly on future deficiencies. However, only an estimated 40
percent of the project is justified by virtue of serving transportation demands of future growth. Thus,
$1S million of the total cost of$36 million is included in the STMP..
II
STMP Funding: $15,000,000
jI
I
2. Interchanges on 1-80 at San Pablo Dani Road and Central Avenue and on Highway 4 at Willow
I4/San Pablo Dam Road-Upgr�de and improve the interchange including provisions for
bicyclists and pedestrians. The project will enhance operations and vehicular,bicycle,pedestrian
safety in the vicinity of the interchange.
II
Cost: $16.7 million
140/Central Avenue-Modify and realign the interchange and ramp at Central Avenue.
II
Cost: $22.5 million
I I
I-80/SR4 Interchange at Willow Avenue-Relocate and realign ramps at Willow Avenue to meet
current standards for improved local access and freeway movements.
it
Cost: $3.0 million to $7.0 million
II
Potential funding source(s): Measure J($30 million); City of Hercules Redevelopment Agency;
private developer contributions; state/federal transportation funds.
Pr�olect Nexus Discussion: Improvements to the three interchanges have an estimated total cost of
$46,200,000. However,two of the I interchanges-the I-80 interchanges with San Pablo Dam Road
and with Central Avenue-are currently deficient and only 27.5 percent(25-year traffic growth
Within the WCCTAC area) of theirl improvement costs can be assigned to the STMP. On the other
hand, the need for the Willow Avenue interchangeimprovements is based in large part on future
growth in the Hercules area. In this case, 50 percent of the costs are assigned to the STMP. The
breakdown of the $14.28 million SITMP assignment is$10.78 million for the two I-80 interchanges
and $3.5 million for the Willow Avenue interchange.
II
STMP Funding: $14,280,000
l
i
2005 STMP Update for WCCTAC i Page 1 1 of 20
TJKM Transportation Consultants May 5, 2006
II
—" 3:1apitol.:Corridor — — — — - -- -
I�
Hercules Passenger Rail Station—Hercules passenger rail station (including parking, station platform,
signage and plazas,rail improvements, etc.). Capital improvements along the corridor in West Contra
Costa(track improvements, drainage, fencing, safety improvements, etc.)
Coisit: $28.2 million for Hercules passenger rail station and $20 million for capital improvements.
Potential Funding Sources: Measure J($7.5 million for the station); $3 million TCRP funds(station),-
state/federal
station);state/federal transportation funds.
Project Nexus Discussion: This project is among those whose justification is related to existing
conditions and deficiencies as well a�needs caused by future growth. Accordingly, 25-year traffic
growth increase within the WCCTAC area,27.5,percent,has been applied to the total project cost of
$48.2 million to result in a STMP allocation of$13.3 million.
,I
STMP Funding: $13,255,000
II
I
4.'1 Ferry Service to Say: Franciscofrom Richmond and/or Hercules/Rodeo
New ferry service to San Francisco from Richmond and/or Hercules/Rodeo utilizing high-speed
vessels. Funds will be used for capital improvements such as vehicles, landside improvements,
parking lighting, transit feeder service, signage, etc. Both ferry services will be in close proximity to
existing and future residential and commercial projects on West County's shorelines.
Cost: $23 million for Richmond (vessels -$12 million; terminal - $11 million); $23 million for
Hercules/Rodeo(vessels - $12 million; terminal -$11 million). Total -$46 million.
Other Potential Funding Sources: Measure J($45 million for operations); $1 bridge toll; state/federal
transportation funds; fare box.
Project Nexus Discussion: This project is among those whose justification is related to existing
conditions and deficiencies as well as needs caused by future growth. It is assumed that a significant
portion of future fent'ridership will come from existing travelers. Accordingly, 25-year traffic
growth increase within the WCCTAC area,27.5 percent,has been applied to the total project cost of
$46 million to result in a STMP allocation of$12.65 million.
STMP Funding: $12,650,000
S:I I BART Access and/or Parking Improvements
As a component of BART's Smart Growth Program, funds would be used for parking, aesthetic
and/or access improvements, station capacity improvements, sidewalks, lighting/restroom
renovations,bicycle storage, expanded automatic fare collection equipment, etc. in the West County
area(El Cerrito Plaza, El Cerrito Del Norte, and/or Richmond).
,II
Cost: $92.1 million for the West County area.
'II
Other Potential Funding Sources: Measure J($15 million); state/federal transportation funds.
I I
;i
i
2005 STMP Update for WCCTAC 1 Page 12 of 20
TJKM Transportation Consultants I May 5, 2006
II i
I
II
I I
--Project Nexus Discussion:-This project is among those whose justification is-related-to-existing — -- — -
conditions and deficiencies as well as1 needs caused by future growth. Accordingly,.25-year traffic
growth increase within the WCCTAC area, 27.5 percent,has been applied to the toal WCCTAC area
project cost of$92.1 million to result in a STMP allocation of$25.33 million.
�i
STMP Funding: $25,330,000
i1
I I
6. IBay Trail Gap Closure
I I
Close gaps in the Bay Trail in West Contra Costa County, including,but not limited to the following:
(1)the one-mile gap along the Richmond Parkway between Pennsylvania and Gertrude Avenues; (2)
the 11.8 mile gap north of Freethy to Payne Drive in Richmond; (3)the two-mile gap from Payne
Drive to Cypress Avenue in Richmond; (4) the one-mile gap from Pinole.Shores to Railroad Avenue
in Pinole; and (5)the 1.8 mile gap from Railroad Avenue to Parker Avenue in Hercules.
II
Cost: $5.49 million
,I
Oilier Potential Funding Sources: EBRPD sources,private developers,other(to be determined).
I I �
Project Nexus Discussion: This prejIect is among those whose justification is related to existing
conditions and deficiencies as well as needs caused by future growth. Accordingly, 25-year traffic
growth increase within the WCCTAC area, 27.5 percent,has been applied to the total WCCTAC area
pr ject cost of$5.49.million to result in a STMP allocation of$1.51 million.
' I
STMP Funding: $1,510,000
II
I I
7.11 San Pablo Dam Road Improvements in Downtown El Sobrante
Revitalization of the downtown bus' ess district in El Sobrante including traffic calming, additional
_signals,pedestrian improvements, turn lanes, etc. that are identified in the Downtown El Sobrante
Transportation and Land Use Plan(and subsequent documents).
Cost: $6.9 million
�I
Poiential funding source(s): Measure J, County funds, other state.and federal transportation funds.
I I
Project Nexus Discussion: This project is among those whose justification is related to existing
conditions and deficiencies as well as needs caused by future growth. Accordingly, 25-year traffic
growth increase within the WCCTAC area, 27.5 percent,has been applied to the total WCCTAC area
project cost of$6.9 million to result in a STMP allocation of$1.9 million.
II I
STMP Funding: $1,900,000
I I
81 Say:Pablo Avenue Corridor Improvements
!I
Transportation for Livable Communities infrastructure improvements on San Pablo Avenue through
Wrest Contra Costa County and within a half-mile walking distance of San Pablo Avenue in either
�I I
it
II
2005 STMP Update for WCCTAC Page 13 of 20
TJKM Transportation Consultants May 5, 2006
�I
II
• iI
- — — —direction.—Also includes-improvements-as-part of the-Sari Pablo Avenue-SMART Corridor project -
–
thatiis.currently underway in Alameda and Contra Costa Counties on San Pablo Avenue.
Cost: $6 million
II
Potential funding source(s): Measure J,Transportation for Livable Communities, state and federal
transportation funds.
Project Nexus Discussion: This prof elct is among those whose justification is related to existing
conditions and deficiencies as well as needs caused by future growth. Accordingly, 25-year traffic
growth increase within the WCCTAC area,27.5 percent, has been applied to the total WCCTAC area
project cost of$6,000,000 to result in a STMP allocation of$1.65 million.
i.
STMP Funding: $1,650,000
it
I
9.'I North Richmond Road Connection Project
I I
Extend Seventh Street northward approximately 0.1 miles to connect to an eastward extension of
Pittsburg Avenue. Pittsburg Avenue would be extended eastward approximately 0.3 miles to connect
to the Seventh Street extension. The extension will facilitate truck and vehicle traffic passing through
North Richmond from the Richmond Parkway.
Cost: $7.95 million
I I
Potential funding source(s): Measure J, state and federal transportation funds, County redevelopment
funds, County funds.
Project Nexus Discussion: This project is among those whose justification is related to existing
conditions and deficiencies as well as needs caused by future growth. However, this project mainly
aims to serve growth in truck traffic,resulting from new development in the North Richmond area. It
is,assumed that at least one-half of the traffic on this project will relate to new development in the
area.The STMP assignment is 50 percent of the total cost, or$4 million.
STMP Funding: $4.0 million
II
10. Hercules Transit Center
I I
Relocate and expand the Hercules Transit Center on the east side of Highway 4 to provide improved
acI cess to/from Highway 4 and improved local circulation.
Cost: $6 million
II
Potential funding source(s): Private developer contributions; Hercules Redevelopment Agency funds;
state and federal transportation funds.
Project Nexus Discussion: This prl ject is among those whose justification is related to existing
conditions and deficiencies as well�as needs caused by future growth. Accordingly, 25-year traffic
growth increase within the WCCTAC area,27.5 percent,has been applied to the total WCCTAC area
project cost of$6.0 million to result in a STMP allocation of$1.65 million.
STMP Funding: $1,650,000
i
�I
2005 STMP Update for WCCTAC Page 14 of 20
TJKM Transportation Consultants May 5, 2006
!i
li
li
;I
11.;Del Norte-Area Traiisit-OrientedIDevelopment project-(public-improvements) -
I _
Planning, engineering, environmental studies, and construction of the public transportation-related
improvements at the El Cerrito Del Norte BART station's Transit Oriented Development project.
Funding will provide improvements including,but not limited to: parking facilities;bicycle,
pedestrian,and/or bus transit access improvements; signage; lighting; improvements to station access
or'station waiting areas; ADA improvements; improvements to adjacent streets, street crossings, or
signals; and/or Ohlone Greenway improvements.
II I
Cost: $25 million
li
Potential funding sources: Private developer contributions; state and federal transportation funds(for
example,Transportation for Livable'Communities funds); Measure J funds.
'I I
Project Nexus Description: This project is among those whose justification is related to existing
conditions and deficiencies as well as needs caused by future growth. Accordingly, the 25-year
traffic growth increase within the WCCTAC area, 27.5 percent,has been.applied to the total project
cost of$25 million to result in a STMP allocation of$6.875 million.
II
STMP Funding: $6,875,000
II
:I I
'II
I:I
II
II
,I I
II
I I
II
I
_ II
'I I
I;
II
II
II
II
I I
III
!I
II
'Il
II .
II
I!
:II
li
2005 STMP Update for WCCTACI Page 15 of 20
TJKM Transportation Consultants) May 5, 2006
II
Ij
CHAPTER 4. STMP PREVIOUS COLLECTIONS AND 2005 UPDATE POTENTIAL
FEE REVENUES
I
Collections To Date
I
Th6 STMP was approved in 1997 and the first funds were received in April of 1998. Between April
of 1998 and July of 2004 a total of=rage
031.39 has been collected, including$97,255.90 in
interest. For this 75-month period, monthly receipts have been approximately$39;200.
i
During this period, the funds were allocated as shown in Table V.
11 I
TABLE V:DISTRIBUTION OF FUNDS RECEIVED TO DATE
Pro'ect Allocation Percent Pa ment Balance
I i Richmond Intermodal $ 232,697.54 7.91 $ 135,391.31 $ 97,306.23
1 Highway 4 West $ 2,393,722.86 81.36 $2,100,435.39 $293,287.47
EI Cerrito Plaza BART Parking $ 232,697.54 7.91 $ 0 $232,697.54
I WCCTAC Administration $ 38,782.92. 1.32 $ 34,137.94 $ 4,644.98
1.1 CCTA Administration $ 44,130.47 1.50 $ 43,576.70 $ 553.77
Total $ 2,942,031.34 100.00 $2,313,541:34 $628,490.00
1 Source: CCTA
If this monthly rate of receipts would continue for a 20-year period,the total receipts would be over
$9.4 million in current dollars,not including any interest. This is one measure of the amount of funds
that could be received over a 25 year period beginning in 2005 if the same fees would_prevail and the
same rate of development were to continue.
The Nexus Analysis prepared in 1997 indicated that the fees established at that time should yield
about$5.1 million over 13 years (1997 to 2010). This calculates to an average of about $33,000 per
month, so the actual receipts of abo t$39,200 per month, including interest, are conservatively close
tolthe original estimates.
II
It should be noted that the 1997 Nexus Analysis showed that WCCTAC could legally establish fees
whose revenues would total $24.5 million. However, at the time it was felt that it was appropriate to
reduce the financial burden on both commercial and residential development. Single-family
residential fees were established at$700 per unit instead of the allowable$2,345. Multi-family
residential fees were reduced from$1,002 to $560. Retail, office and industrial fees were established
at;$0.20 per square foot, instead of allowable rates ranging from$1.37 to$2.88 per square foot of
development.
PIotential Fee Revenues From 20015 Update
1
As noted above, the 1997 Nexus Analysis justified a total cost of$24.5 million in funds to be paid by
the fee. This amounts to a rate of about$2,100 per peak hour trip. However,the amount of fee
actually enacted amounted to about $440 per peak hour trip, or about 20 percent of the maximum
amount. As noted in Table III, there is an estimated 28,571 a.m.peak hour trips associated with the
expected growth in development in,!the 25-year period beginning in 2005. Using the 1997 rates, this
amount.of trips would account for$12.6 million at the reduced rate of$440 per trip over the 25-year
period or $60.0 million at the full rate of$2,100 per peak hour trip.
Recommendations for the fees assoIciated with the 2005 STMP update are described in the next
chapter.
�I I
�1
i
2005 STMP Update for WCCTAC ! Page 16 of 20
TJKM Transportation Consultants May 5, 2006
1j
li
II
1j
CHAPTER 5. PROGRAM COSTS AND FEE CALCULATION
11
Updated Cost per Trip Estimate
II
Table VI presents a summary of the STMP improvement project costs,required adjustments to
account for past STMP activities,the projected future trips to be added by new development, and the
resulting estimated STMP improvement cost per trip. The total cost of the STMP projects to be
included is $370,840,000. Adjustments to the fee are as follows:
li
10 Outside Funding- $121,848,000: These are anticipated funds from outside sources that will
1 offset the costs of projects in the STMP. See Table IV for details.
I• Exceeds Nexus- $150,892,000: These are funds that exceed the nexus test described in
1 Chapter 3 and 6.
II
These adjustments are applied to the fee calculation as shown in Table VI. The updated fee
calculation is based on trip generation estimates in Table 3 and the cost estimates of the STMP
improvement projects presented in Table IV. The updated cost per trip is $3,507,using a total STMP
project cost of$101,043,000 and a total of 28,810 new a.m.peak hour trips. The STMP improvement
projects cost and the STMP portion of these costs as well as the calculated new STMP cost per trip
are ishown in Table VI.
I
Table VII presents the new STMP schedule of fees. The land use categories in this fee schedule
reflect the current situation with the STMP.
it i
�I
TABLE VI:2005 COST PER TRIP ESTIMATE
II 1
STMP Portion of Actual STMP STMP Portion Change from
STMP Improvement Projects 1997 Costs Fee Adopted of Change
In 1997 2005 Costs 1997
II
1 All Projects $64,267,500 - $370,840,000 +$306,572,500
Subtotal $64,267,500 -- $370,840,000 +$306,572,500
I-i
Outside Funding $39,841,000 - $ 121,848,000 +$82,007,000
Exceeds Nexus - -- $150,892,000 +$150,892,000
Net Improvement Costs I $24,426,500 $5,100,000 $98,100,000 +$73,673,500
Plus Administrative Costs(3%) (Included in total) -- $2,943,000 -
II -
1 Total STMP Funding $24,426,500 $5,100,000 $101,043,000 +$76,616,500
II
Total Peak Hour Trips Added by
New Development11,589 11,589 .28,810 + 17,223
i STMP Cost Per Trip $2,100 $4401 $3,507 1 +$1,407
I1
JI
g
i
1�I
I�
2005 STMP Update for WCCTAC Page 17 of 20
TJKM Transportation Consultants May 5, 2006
I
II
I
-TABI E VII:2005-RECo1V MFNDED STMP ROTES AND-FEES AND-FEES- — ---
ii
II
Ii 2005
Peak Hour Units of 1997 Fee Rates 1997 Fee Rates
Land Uses Trip Rat es Use Fee Rates* (full funding) as Adopted
(full funding)
Single-family Residential 0.741 DU $2,595 $ 1,554 $700
Multi-family Residential 0.471 DU $1,648 $987 $560
Senior Housing 0.211 DU $701 — —
II Hotel 0.561 Room $1,964 — —
Retail 0.521. SF $1.82 $0.34 $0.20
Office 1.001 SF $3.51 $ 2.79 $0.20
Industrial' 0.70 SF $2.45 $ 1.89 $0.20
i Storage facility 0.15 SF $0.53 - -
II Church 0.45 SF $1.58 -
II Hospital 1.20 SF $4.21 -
Ij
DU=Dwelling Unit
SF=Square Feet
j Note:Based on$3,507 per peak hour trip
Other Factors In STMP Update
Trip Adjustments The peak hour trip'rate for the retail category was adjusted.to account for trip
lengths as described in the 1997 study. The base a.m. rate for retail was reduced by 50 percent to
account for reduced trip lengths as compared with non-retail uses. Trip rates for the office category
were reduced from1.33 trips per thousand square feet (ksf)to 1.00 trips per ksf. industrial trip rates
were reduced from 0.90 to 0.70.
Exempt Development In the 1997 study, it was found that slightly more than 10 percent of the land
use depicted as future growth already had some level of land use entitlements and would be exempt
from the STMP payments. These exemptions were either because a) a vested tentative map had been
issued, or b)a development agreement had been completed which specifically excludes assessment of
any ladditional fees. It will continue tlo be appropriate for fees to be waived in these cases, although it
is unlikely that development agreements have been approved subsequent to 1997 that eliminate
participation in WCCTAC STMP fees.
Special Cases As was the case in 1997, it remains appropriate for developers to request a special
traffic study if it is felt that their particular land use proposal either does not fit into one of the land
use categories or if the particular devlelopment may generate less traffic than the category provides.
Th'e methodology for conducting such a study shall be approved by the WCCTAC upon
recommendation of the WCCTAC-TAC. The appropriate governing/permitting agency shall be
responsible for reviewing and appro i ing the individual traffic studies.
Establishment of Final WCCTAC STNV Fee WCCTAC may decide, as it did in 1997,not to levy
the' fall fee that has been established as a part of this study. If.so,the results will be reflected in an
adjustment to this study.
I I ,
li
II
2005 STMP Update for WCCTAC I Page 18 of 20
TJKM Transportation Consultants May 5, 2006
II
CHAPTER 6. NEXUS FINDINGS
Forecasts of future traffic volumes were made to provide the data needed to establish the reasonable
connection between new development's travel demand and the need for and costs of the proposed
projects within the WCCTAC area. ABAG's Projections 2003 was used to determine the amount of
growth in land use in the west county, area between 2005 and 2030. Subsequently,traffic usage
related to the growth was calculated as described in Chapter 2.
I.I
Using the traffic generation results and the estimated project costs, the portion of the estimated
project costs that can reasonably be connected with the need generated by projected new development
has!been calculated.
11
The following process was used to established the amount of a project that can attributed to growth
and thereby be eligible for STMP funding:
II
Amount of households in 2005 88,050(from Table 1)
Amount of employees in 2005 82,150 (from Table 2)
Household trips in 2005=88,050 x 0.63 i 55,472
Employment trips in 2005=82,150 x 0.60* 49,290
i Total trips in 2005=55,472+49,290 i 104,762
Growth in trips between 2005 and 2030 28,810(from Table 3)
Percent of traffic related to 25 year growth=28,8101104,762 27.5%
*Trip rates—see page 5 for details
II
Therefore,as noted in the Project Nexus Discussion in Chapter 3 for each of the 11 STMP projects, a
minimum of 27.5 percent of the.cost of each project was assigned to the STMP, unless a lesser
amount of funds is necessary to fully fund the proposed project. In a few cases, a greater percentage
ways utilized when conditions dictated.
!I �
It1is noted that of the $371 million worth of needed improvements identified in this analysis, over
$121 million in outside funding sources have been identified. These outside sources primarily-
1 161ude proposed Contra Costa County Measure J, which is the extension of the one-half percent sales
taz levied for transportation improvements. Measure J,which is intended to fund improvements
which will correct both existing and future deficiencies, is a partner to the STMP extension,which by
law must only fund future transportation deficiencies associated with new development. Measure J
was approved by Contra Costa County voters in the general election on November 2, 2004. In
addition, the project nexus analyses indicated that$150,892,000 of the projects does not meet the
minimum nexus requirement. Thust of the total deficiencies identified in the 11 proposed STMP
ij
projects, only 27 percent of the funding comes from the STMP.
The methodology of this report is to ensure that only the portion of the projects included in the STMP
project list is necessitated by the growth in traffic between 2005 conditions and 2030 conditions. .
Thus, there is a reasonable relationship between the proposed use of the STMP and the proposed land
uIse development projects on which)the fee will be imposed. In the same manner there is a reasonable
relationship between the need for facilities included in the STMP and the proposed land use
development projects.
.I I
.I I
2005 STMP Update for WCCTAC Page 19 of 20
TJKM Transportation Consultants May 5, 2006
ii
Ij
' II
II
CHAPTER 7. -STUDY PARTICIPANTS
li I
e
Ii
TJKM Transportation Consultants Personnel
II
Chris D.Kinzel, P.E. f Project Engineer
Brad Thornton I Project Engineer
Dan Harrison Project Planner
Evi Pagh Word Processing/Production
The Reed Group
II
Robert Reed Principal
ii
Persons/Agencies Consulted/WCCITAC --TAC Members
.i i
Lisa Hammon, Managing Director WCCTAC
Brad Beck CCTA
Bruce Beyaert Trails for Richmond Action Committee(TRAQ
Aleida Chavez WestCAT
Rich Davidson I City of Richmond
John Greitzer Contra Costa County Community Development Department
Deidre Heitman BART
Adele Ho City of San Pablo
Bruce King City of El Cerrito
Nathan Landau AC Transit .
Steve Lawton I City of Hercules
John MacKenzie Caltrans
Brent Salmi Pinole
!I
II
II
II
II
'I I
I I
II
'I l
;I I
Ali
II
�I I
II -
�il
'Il i
2005 STMP Update for WCCTAC Page 20 of 20
TJKM Transportation Consultants) May 5, 2006
II
I
LEGAL'--PU=BLICAT-ION
Contra Costa County
STA_COl1K� .
FROM: I Clerk of the Board TO: Contra Costa Times
:11651 Pine St., Room 106 P.O. Box 4718
Pine Street, Martinez 94553 Walnut Creek, CA 94596
II E-MAIL: cctlegals@cctimes.com
FAX No. 925-943-8359
Requested by:: �' L. SRARP I Date: JUN:? 139 2006
Phone No.:1 925-335-1903 Reference No.:
II
. Org.: OG Sub Object: 2190 Task: SAS Activity: 6P4007
Publication Date s UNE 30 ands L,Y 07, 2006
Ij
No. of Pages: (2)
I
LEGAL PUBLICATION ORDINANiCE FOR THE-.;.WEST CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION
ADVISORY COMMITTEE FEE PROGRAM.
11
II I
li
II E-MAIL
*** Immediately, upon expiration of publication, **
send in one affidavit for each publication in
11 order that the auditor may be authorized to pay you bill.
I I ,
Authorized Signatu
Please confirm date of publication and receipt of this fax.
'I I
_ 11
:I I
�I
II
II
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
I, 255 GLACIER DRIVE
MAR'CINE7, CA 94553
II
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND AVAILABILITY OF DATA
(Ordinance for the West Contra Costa Transportation Advisory Committee Fee Program)
II
The.IBoard of Supervisors will hold a public hearing on July 18, 2006 at 9:30 a.m. in the Board Chambers. County
Administration Building, 651 Pine Street! Martinez, CA. to consider Ordinance 2006-21 for the West Contra Costa
Transportation Advisory Committee (WCCTAC) Program Area.
Feesl collected through the West Contra Costa Transportation Advisory Committee will be collected only from
new''development within this portion of unincorporated Contra Costa County and will be collected upon the
issuance of a building permit.
II
The,WCCTAC Subregional Transportation Mitigation Program is the result of a Master Cooperative Agreement
between the Contra Costa Transportation Authority, the Cities of EI Cerrito, Hercules, Pinole, Richmond, and San
Pablo, the County of Contra Costa, and the West Contra Costa Transportation Advisory Committee. The
WCCTAC will support the list of regional improvements described in the West Contra.Costa Transportation
Advisory Committee Subregional Transportation Mitigation Fee Program Update (Development Program Report).
II
The, proposed fees for approval by the Board of Supervisors are:
Land Use Proposed Fee
Single-Family Residential $2,595 per dwelling unit
i Multi-Family Residential $1,648 per dwelling unit
I Senior Housing I $701 per dwelling unit
Hotel $1,964 per room
Retail/Commercial $1.82 per square foot of gross floor area
Office $3.51 per square foot of gross floor area
Industrial $2.45 per square foot of gross floor area
:11 Storage Facility $0.53 per square foot of gross floor area
i Church $1.58 per square foot of gross floor area
Hospital $4.21 per square foot of gross floor area
Other* $3,507 per AM peak hour trip
'The fees for uses not listed above shall be determined by the sponsor collecting the fee according to information
generated by appropriate traffic studies, or other means of determining traffic impacts as approved by WCCTAC,
or in accordance with the Institute of Traffic Engineers(ITE) Manual.
II
In addition, an administration fee equal to 2 percent of the Program revenue shall be assessed.
As with most fee.programs, the fee revenue from the WCCTAC program will not pay the cost of all regional
improvements. Other funding must be generated, some of which include fees generated from Measure C and
State Transportation Improvement(S IP) Funds.
II
The Development Program Report, which includes a description of the proposed improvement cost estimates
and funding mechanism will be available at the Clerk of the Board.
For more information, contact Brian Louis of the County Public Works Department, Transportation Engineering
Division at 313-2245.
li
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and
Entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
II I
I
AtTESTED JUNE 13, 2006
II
JOHN CULLEN, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
a,nd County Administrator
II
BY EMYL. SHARP DEPUTY
PUBLICATION DATES JUNE 30 and JULY 07, 2006
li
iI
II
;i I
II �
II
3 1•.
;•ti` 3 : mac•
i
i.:
5
3
yt..
4
f.
}
F,_ I�
�. t
a
R ;::..:
3
j Y
4
y,
1
I
......
/\
i
a
1
<i
..... .. - .. 7..... ....... .... .. :..:
.......................
v .
'...fit�.:��'.:�i:�''
r=s
s
^:.
�:» ... .. 1
CL
S " :: :.i
4
I
f
%�1.:.::.,........ ...
IL
'S
..............
..............
............:::
•S4.
1A 9
}
t
4
I
. .....
d
3 s
"ii
s
�....��+ a
S
"::(:
%�
r
1p:
w;
2
V.
I
O
O
s i
2
t?4
V
Im
' ?i
...................
_ I <',
...............:
w:4?'
4
A.
.. ....... .... '•'•i Jay(
S ......:. r.4.
i;::• [���� t:: :.::
s 3? W
.s; 2c
t.1 f
V.
Ant4
:l•�' ..-. acs:' •i�.Ar"�:
:.
rl
1
7
1
(::::
- v
I
. ...........
...:.........
..........
::I::i;'
son
�- a
- ,�. ������`:� r
V _
lotO ., rte• ........:...
;..
O � y> r,
Ak
ja
CD
�I
II
�II
I I
• II •
I i CONTRA COSTA COUNT
PUBLIC-WORKS -DEPARTME-NT-.
255 Glacier Drive
Martinez, CA 94553
II
I I
�I
PUBLICATION -REQUEST
TOi: Jane Penninbtoni Chief.,.Clerk- of the Board
.Atte.:, Emy Sharp, Deputy Clerk, Clerk of the Board
esharacob.cccoimty.us
FROM: Brian Louis
I I
Public Works Department
(925) 313-2245
II
BOARD MTC. DATE: June 13, 2006
i,
PREVIOUSLY APPROVED BY BOSON:
HEARING DATE: JUIN1.8, 2006
li
PUBLICATION DATES: To be determined by Clerk of the Board
i
REQUESTED PUBLISHING PAPER(S): Contra Costa Times
;I
I I •
Dbl not type below this line—Publication lan-iia,;e oar follojvina paae
I I
I I
I,
�I
li
I I
�I I
I�
I I
II
I I
1`,c"11m1nL!.)(':\I..S ICfC11111 '.Lot us.NoleS.D;llW.hIbIlCil iun I.cyuczt-\l%i'i_I'ACA10C
it
I of 2
II
I
i
,I I
'I.I
11
i
II
1
II
�I
II
II
;I
II
I I
-. :i it i., - _ -
WSW
;I I
ym,ryr b"`d1C�e'�ei
ti i J i. 1 .J
I
it I
Ci P r 1,i of t h e 1"'i=i e i'fs..
I I '
Req uested by:. tot-1. SYTO
s. l'ir.l1lE: IE.:i
�I
('l
r 4�.
`7%
Sal s_.S 1, .� 's:•4v .. i'.ll.(..' I? l;1_ ..... .
T.
,I
I I -.
• t+Ti {
- -;� - - - ---LEGAL PL _BLICATI-ONRE - - I -- -- -- - -- -
_ s
r Contra Costa County
ST'9`COUK7� .
11 1 •
FROM: i Clerk of the Board TO: Contra Costa Times
11651 Pine St., Room 106 P.O. Box 471.8
iPine Street, Martinez 94553 Walnut Creek, CA 94596
E-MAIL: cctlegals@cctimes.com
II FAX No. 925-943-8359
Requested by,: M L. SHARP Date: JM 13, 2006
925-335-1903
Phone No.:! Reference No.:
Ora.: 067611 Sub Object: 21901 Task: SAS Activit>,,: 6P4007
Publication! Date (s) JUNE 30 and JULY 07, 2006
No. of Pages: (2)
I I
LEGAL PUBLICATION URGENCY ORDINANCE FOR INTERIM WEST CONTRA COSTA
i� TRANSPIORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE FEE PROGRAM
ii
I,
e mail
*** Immediately- upon expiration of publication., y**
send in one atifidavit for each publication in
order that the auditor may be authorized to pay you bill.
ii
Authorized Sianature:
i
Please confirm date of publication land receipt of this fax.
iI
Ale
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
.- - -- —
.EIIBLIC_- ORE'S DEPART.-M:EN.T------ -- — .- - ---- -- . — --
255 Glacier Drive
j Martinez, CA 94553
I I
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND AVAILABILITY OF DATA
Ij I
(Urgency Ordinance for the Interim West Contra Costa Transportation Advisory Committee Fee Program)
The Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing on July 18; 2006 at 9:30 a.m. in the Board Chambers, County
Administration Building, 651 Pine Street, Martinez, CA. to consider adopting an Interim Urgency Ordinance (Ordinance
2006-20)for the West Contra Costa Transportation Advisory Committee (WCCTAC) Program Area.
Fees collected through the West Contra Costa Transportation Advisory Committee will be collected only from new
development within this portion of unincorporated Contra Costa County and will be collected upon the issuance of a
building)permit.
The WCCTAC Subregional Transportation Mitigation Program is the result of a Master Cooperative Agreement between
the Contra Costa Transportation Authority, the Cities of EI Cerrito, Hercules, Pinole, Richmond, and San Pablo, the
Countylof Contra Costa, and the West Contra Costa Transportation Advisory Committee. The WCCTAC will support the
list of regional improvements described in the West Contra Costa Transportation Advisory Committee Subregional
Transportation Mitigation Fee Program Up ate (Development Program Report).
11
The proposed fees for approval by the Board of Supervisors are:
;Land Use Proposed Fee
Single-Family Residential $2,595 per dwelling unit
!Multi-Family Residential $1,648 per dwelling unit
(Senior Housing. $701 per dwelling unit
Hotel $1,964 per room
(Retail/Commercial I $1.82 per square foot of gross floor area
I:Office $3.51 per square foot of gross floor area
Industrial $2.45 per square foot of gross floor area
(Storage Facility $0.53 per square foot of gross floor area
Church $1.58 per square foot of gross floor area
Hospital $4.21 per square foot of gross floor area
Other* j $3,507 per AM peak hour trip
*The fees for uses not listed above shall be determined by the sponsor collecting the fee according to information
generated by appropriate traffic studies, o,r other means of determining traffic impacts as approved by WCCTAC, or in
accord;ahce with the Institute of Traffic Engineers(ITE) Manual.
I
In addition, an administration fee equal to 2 percent of the Program revenue shall be assessed.
As witH most fee programs, the fee revenue from the WCCTAC program will not pay the cost of all regional
improvements. Other funding must be generated, some of which include fees generated from Measure C and State
Transportation Improvement(STIP) Funds.
II
The Development Program Report, which includes a description of the proposed improvement cost estimates and
funding;mechanism will be available at thei Clerk of the Board.
For more information, contact Brian Louis of the County Public Works Department, Transportation Engineering Division
at 313F2245.
I het-chy eci-61 ,that this is a true and correct eopv ofan action taken and
anlcrcd on the minutes ofthc Huard ul'Suput'visors on the date showm.
I
AT,fl:1'F]D: .TUNE 13.2006
II I
Jc kIL\ C'LJ1..1,1 \, (Acrk ol'thc Iioard ol'tiuhe r isur;ani)i_uuniy
:\lminislratur
�I
i
13y, EMM L.SHARP I
Deputy
ij
Publication Dates:
IUNE 30 and JULY 07,2006
I�
I�
II I
II
II
AY
........:: . ....
....
'I: S
ti.
»......
......
: ::....
..................:. .......
.:.:::.::.
..... .....:
,.:::.:
s
J
3
................... ..:. :.
..:::.:.:::::::::..
...............
i
i4
L«.
:::.:...............
1 t
•s;` ::
.. ..........
r
. ........... . ....
.
V
t'
.............
.:::::::::::::.
l
::::........
a I
CL j
i+
...;:.;:.;
V
4
✓T::::.: ...
f
Y.:.
177
..,......;:,:.;;:.::.::
,
}} t.
a..4.,.
f..
`A
1
:i
z:
ff l
..........:::
..........
..........:;::.
.... .......:.
I
ti
] <5
�r
I
f
t• .... ........
O
r
I
.r�
:... .:::::::
t
f•
J.
. '�2::::::;::;::::;:::::is::':2'::.:;::::::::;;::.:.:::. :r:.
::�:;nt��'':.:.:::::::
..............
..............
...........:::
..............
C.. slox
O t
.
.................
, .
■� :I:.:.:,r.
3{
^
...% ".
IL
............
Co
w
.�: is �'^'.:::•:•; ,„,f
�..r
CL
lifol
:. ...:>r:.:<::::;s::,:::
.i_
.:::': fi
,
to .
i:iiJ::: ::
T
:::ii`<:�
Mbw ( �. .f.. L
OIwo
I
,M,.
r
r• : �:;� a�si. .;.;.;.::, fir-
le
I
d 3 ' �
co
�i O
III L
ill
�I
�II
II
Ij
CONTRA COSTA COUNT
I
-PUBLIC--WORKS DE-PARTM-ENT
255 Glacier Drive
II
I I
Martinez, CA 94553
I
SII '
PUBLICATION REQUEST
II
II
TOS: Jane Pemlinaton, Chief., Clerk of the Board
Attn: Emy Sharp, Deputy Clerk. Clerk of the Board
eshar_nwcob.000ollllty.[IS
FRIOM: Brian Louis
Public Works Department
(925)) 313-224
II
B6A1 RD MTG. DATE: June 13, 2006
�I
PREVIOUSLY APPROVED BY BOS ON:
II
HEARING DATE: July 18, 2006
II
PUBLICATION DATES: To be determined by Clerk of the Board
j
REQt'ESTED PUBLISHING PAPER(S): Contra Costa Times
II
'I I
II
N Inot tw-pe below this line—Publication larr;rtq�e on folloit,iira pt{ge
.I I
I
II
Ij
'I I
II
ij
SII
I.�
�II
II
II
I:�-)(•ti\1Ci-1 cshn�iLCt 'r\L.ti..l l'cmli<'.I.ouis.\ lcs.l-hua'I'uhlicationkequest-\Vi'<"'I';\C'.dor
II
II
ii
�. .------. ..... ----- — —--. ..—
I -
11
f)
,I I
II iL=-i_1tl1fi:::=t CCS'=,TH 1_FUHT' !_l—EPK OF THS
I,
II
DATE 14 =.P-T I NE r!I",l H1 T I F-1 I I Of i)
44
F 7, :: J4< GJt i rt
I1
ii
11
li
(i
it
it
II
2017_ 1—� __ ��.. IT�'H �__`'Ti� +-0i_T-IT`i' t—LE ;4, OF THE ra_;1-- _ _... _' 19 'l
II
LE
� IIN
rl y �� TI 0pj�� qq It
Contra Cos �:��1111t4
I,
it ��: Contra
FROM: ;C1erk of the: Board Ca�L 4.71
05, 4"ine St., t_c►om f 06
1 59fi
(pine Street, NMartinei 94553 �'� alnc�c Creek, � j� u
;I E^MAtl_, c:c.t1e9:1s i`,cetin'e".c;cam
.II FA
No 925-943-83-9
it
I i
JSE- —I-j-,—3—t
EIN L. T Date:
Recueste0 ',br •_ . _
925-33: -].903 'o '�efercn
'tunc No."
I,
Sub - a�t• 21�3U� � f�411: ��~-�.+�5'.tl�'�t�•.. C6''4C
��.,r:_ _..._._....�.�.
t'u�r{acafi:itan date f��} .:
rPaves---
` Ili �l \ � L-i�,,CY C�LLL/1 NAL'1`
_..._...._-