Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
MINUTES - 09282004 - C.72
Contra Costa TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS County t FROM: Dennis M. Barry, AICP Community Development Director °° DATE: SEPTEMBER 28, 2004 SUBJECT: CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION REPORT FOR FY 2003104 CDBG, HOME, ESG, and HOPWA PROGRAMS SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATIONS(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATIONS 1. AUTHORIZE submission of the Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report(CAPER)for FY 2003/04 Community Development Block Grant(CDBG), HOME Investment Partnerships Act (HOME); Emergency Shelter Grant (ESG); and Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA) programs to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD); and 2. AUTHORIZE the Deputy Director– Redevelopment or their designee to execute the appropriate documents for transmittal to HUD FISCAL IMPACT None CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: X—YES SIGNATURE: RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR _f ' RECO ENDATION F BOARD COMMITTEE APPROVE OTHER f E r SIGNATURE(S): ACTION OF BOARD OW` H =' :T APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A UNANIMOUS (ABSENT'.% zf'' ) TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN AYES: NOES: ACTION TAKEN AND ENTERED ON THE ABSENT: ABSTAIN: MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. Source: Bob Calkins, CDBG Program Manager (925) 335-1250 ATTESTED i e""rx X,`". 10 `. Orig. Dept. Community Development-CDBG JOHN SWEETA, CLERK OF cc: County Administrator THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR BYDEPUTY BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS The CAPER for FY 2003/04 is required by the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, for entitlement jurisdictions for the Community Development Block (CDBG), HOME Investment Partnership Act (HOME), Emergency Shelter Grant (ESG), Housing Opportunities for People with AIDS (HOPWA) programs. The CAPER provides the County with an opportunity to evaluate its overall progress in carrying out priorities and objectives in the 5-year Consolidated Plan and annual Action Plan. HUD uses the CAPER to evaluate whether(1) the County, on behalf of the Urban County and HOME Consortium has carried out projects/programs as described in its Consolidated and Action Plans; (2) CDBG, HOME, ESG, and HOPWA assisted activities are eligible and meet a national objective, and whether expenditures meet certain statutory requirements; and (3) the County has demonstrated a continuing capacity to carry out its HUD funded programs. The basic elements of the CAPER are the following: summary of resources and expenditures, programmatic accomplishments, status of actions taken during the year to implement objectives contained in the Consolidated Plan, and evaluation of progress made during the past year in addressing identified priority needs and objectives. Highlights of the CAPER include the following: • The County received $8.1 million in new CDBG, HOME, ESG and HOPWA funds for use in accomplishing housing and non-housing community development objectives. • The County expended $10.5 million on approved projects and programs. • For each dollar spent in County federal funds, $7.52 was leveraged from other federal, State, local and private resources. • In the Economic Development category, CDBG funds were used to assist 220 businesses and place 112 people in jobs. • Six Infrastructure/Public Facilities projects were completed during the year. • Public service programs served more than 20,000 lower income County residents • Nine housing projects were completed providing 176 affordable housing units, including 131 rental units and 45 homeowner units. These projects included new construction and rehabilitation for families, seniors, and individuals with special needs. • The County has made substantial progress in meeting its five-year housing and non-housing goals as described in the Consolidated Plan. In fact, during the first four years the County (with assistance from our partners) has met or exceeded its five-year goals in 16 of 31 Consolidated Plan priorities (see Tables G and 1 of the CAPER). CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FY 2003/ 04 CAPER (Consolidated Annual Performance & Evaluation Report) 40 I irrtr 1 .... 6:5. f ria r 1 �+' r � 4r ao/ COU Community Development Block Grant HOME Investment Partnerships Act Emergency Shelter grants Housing Opportunities for Persons with AILS DRAFT September 14,, 2004 Table of Contents Section1. Introduction.................................................................................................................. 1 Section II, Financial Summary Report......................................................................................... 2 A. Total Resources Available for Achieving Consolidated Plan Objectives in FY2003/04.................................................................................................................... 2 B. Total Revenues and Expenditures in FY 2003/04—CDBG, HOME, HOPWA and ESG............................................................................................................................... 3 C. Leveraging of Resources of FY 2003/04 Completed Projects...................................... 4 Section111. CDBG Narrative........................................................................................................ 7 A. Non-Housing Community Development....................................................................... 7 A.1. Priority/goal assessment............................................................................................ 7 A.2. Accomplishments...................................................................................................... 8 B. Affordable Housing..................................................................................................... 10 C. Changes to the Program.............................................................................................. 10 D. Consolidated Plan Implementation/Certifications ...................................................... 10 E. Displacement Narrative............................................................................................... 11 F. Neighborhood Revitalization--®North Richmond Neighborhood Revitalization Strategy Area Accomplishments................................................................................. I 1 G. Five-year Assessment....................................................................................................... 15 Section IV. HOME and CDBG Housing Narratives.................................................................. 19 A. Allocation of Funds..................................................................................................... 19 B. Match Contributions.................................................................................................... 19 C. MBE/WBE Analysis................................................................................................... 20 D. On-site Inspections...................................................................................................... 20 E. Affirmative Marketing................................................................................................ 21 F. Actions to Address the Housing Needs of Special Needs Populations....................... 22 G. Slow Moving Projects................................................................................................. 22 H. Displacement............................................................................................................... 22 1. Accomplishments........................................................................................................ 22 J. Five-year Assessment.................................................................................................. 23 Section V. HOPWA Narrative—HIV/AIDS Activities ............................................................. 24 SectionVI. ESG Narrative......................................................................................................... 25 Section VII. General Narratives.................................................................................................. 26 A. Five-year Assessment.................................................................................................. 26 B. Location of Projects (Investments)and Public Participation (Beneficiaries).............. 26 C. Fair Housing................................................................................................................ 26 L. Affordable Housing..................................................................................................... 27 E. Continuum of Care...................................................................................................... 27 F. Other Actions.............................................................................................................. 30 F.I Actions to address obstacles to meeting underserved needs................................... 30 F.2 Actions to foster/maintain affordable housing........................................................ 30 F.3 Actions to eliminate barriers to affordable housing................................................ 30 F.4 Actions to overcome gaps in the institutional structure.......................................... 31 F.5 Actions to improve public housing and resident initiatives.................................... 31 F.6 Actions to alleviate lead-based paint hazards ......................................................... 33 F.7 Actions to ensure compliance with program and planning requirements............... 34 F.8 Actions to reduce the number of people living in poverty...................................... 35 G. Leveraging........................................................................................................... .... 37 H. Summary of Citizen Comments.................................................................................. 37 I. Self-Evaluation: Progress in Meeting Consolidated Plan Goals................................. 38 Appendix A—CDBG Financial Summary Report.................................................................... 40 Appendix B—ESG Financial Summary....................................................................................43 Appendix C—Additional Contra Costa Consortium and Urban County HOME ProgramInformation...................................................................................................................44 Appendix D—Affirmative Marketing Procedures.................................................................... 45 Appendix E–Completed and Ongoing Projects by Funding Category...................................... 48 LIST OF TABLES Table A—Summary of Resources...............................................................................................2 Table B—Resources and Expenditures....................................................................................... 3 Table C—Leveraging of FY 2003/04 Completed Projects.........................................................4 Table D— Summary of Community Development Accomplishments— EconomicDevelopment........................................................................................................ 8 Table E—Summary of Community Development Accomplishments— Infrastructure and Public Facilities........................................................................................ 9 Table F—Summary of Community Development Accomplishments— PublicService...................................................................................................................... 10 Table G—Five-year Assessment of Non-Housing Projects...................................................... 17 TableH—On-site Inspections................................................................................................... 21 Table I—Five-year Affordable Housing Goals and Accomplishments ................................... 23 Table J—McKinney Act Funded Projects................................................................................. 29 -......................I....................................... Section L Introduction Access to safe, sanitary and affordable housing, living wage jobs, essential social services, and viable communities are important factors in determining the prosperity and livability of a community. Contra Costa County, on behalf of the Urban County' has participated in the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program since its inception in 1975. The primary purpose of the CDBG program is the development of viable urban communities by providing decent housing,a suitable living environment,and expanded economic opportunities for persons of very-low and low-income. The purpose of the HOME Investment Partnerships Act (HOME) program is to expand the supply of decent, safe, sanitary, and affordable housing for very-low and low-income families and households. In June of 1993,Contra Costa County as the Urban County representative and the Cities of Antioch, Concord, Pittsburg, and Walnut Creek joined together to form a Consortium for purposes of participation in the HOME program'. In addition to CDBG and HOME,the County receives Emergency Shelter Grants(ESG)funds to improve and expand the supply of shelters for the homeless,and to provide homeless prevention activities and support services. ESG funds must benefit Urban County homeless populations. Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS'(HOPWA)funds may be used throughout the County for the development ofhousing affordable to and occupied by low-income persons with HTV/AIDS. Participation by the County in these four programs has substantially increased affordable rental and homeownership opportunities,and expanded the availability of employment,recreation,health services,childcare,and other social services in Contra Costa. In compliance with federal regulations,in April 2000 the County and the Consortium members adopted the FY 2400/01-2004/05 Contra Costa Consolidated Plan.("Five-fear Plan"or"Consolidated Plan").Based on an assessment of community needs,the Consolidated Plan identifies affordable housing and community development goals,objectives and strategies to be implemented by Consortium members over the five-year planning period. The County's annual Action Plan identifies specific programs and projects to be implemented by the County in the current program year.These projects are consistent with and designed to achieve the goals and objectives identified in the Five-Year Plan. As required by 24 CFR 91.52,the Contra Costa County Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report(CAPER)for FY 2043/44 provides an analysis of the progress the County has made in the past four fiscal years in carrying out the Five-Year Consolidated Plan, and the FY 2043/44 Action Plan for the CDBG, HOME,ESG and HOPWA$programs. 'The County's eligible area,known as the Urban County,is the entire County,less the cities of Antioch,Concord,Pittsburg,Richmond,and Walnut Creek which operate independent CDBG programs. 2 This report uses the following definitions: • Low-income households are defined as households with incomes at or below 80 percent of the Area Median Income(AMI)for the Oakland PMSA as adjusted for household size and defined on an annual basis by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development(HUD). • Very-low income households are defined as households with incomes at or below 50 percent of AMI. • Extremely-low income households are defined as households with incomes at or below 30 percent of AMI. 3 The City of Richmond is an independent jurisdiction for purposes of participation in the CDBG and HOME Programs. °Contra Costa County administers HOPwA funds under a Funding Agreement with the City of Oakland. A more detailed HOPWA annual report for Contra Costa County activities is provided to the City of Oakland for inclusion in its CAPER and is available to interested parties on request. Contra,Costa County FY 2003/04 CAPER 1 Section II. Financial Summary Report A. Total Resources Available for Achieving Consolidated Plan Objectives in FY 2003/04 During FY 2003/04,County projects received$178.92 million in resources and matching funds for use in accomplishing housing and non-housing community development objectives identified in the Consolidated Plan. The following table provides detail on the sources of these funds. Table A--- Summary of Resources s i Federal State/Local Private i Total Resources ICDBG $ 4,209,000 $ 4,209,000 HOME 3,319,607 i 3,319,607 HOME/CDBG Pro am Income a) 5,647,411' 5,647,411; HOPWA 481,382 481,382' Emergency Shelter Grant i 134,000 134,000; McKinne Act Funds : 7,700,000 I 7,700,000 Ca ital Fund Program(Co.Housing Authority) `Section 8 79,796,257 79,796,257 County Redevelopment Agency Funds E Housing Set-aside/Tax-increment 8,900,175 8,900,175' Capital Funds/Tax-increment 2,225,044 2,225,0441 City RDA Hsg Set-aside funds provided to ; Coun CDBG/HOME housing projects 4,689,667 4,689,667 City RDA Capital Funds provided to County 1 non-housing CDBG Projects HUD Section 202 Program.... 3,973,755 3,973,755 HUD Section 811 Pro am I,167,819 1,167,819E MCC Pro am 10,600,0001 10,600,0001 3 Ryan White Funds FEMA I 540,891 540,891 EHAP—State 88,505 88,505 LIHTCs 12,143,156 7,285,100 19,428,256 Bond Funds Tax Exem t,CHFA {Cour General Fund Homeless Shelters) 345,935' 345,935: Other Federal,State,Local funds 1 2,567,519 13,246,338 j 15,813,857; Private Foundations/Donations 9,345,884 9,345,844 Private Lenders/Investors 520,800 520,800 TOTAL 5104,396 067 557,38(!,394 517,151,78 $178,92892451 {a Pro income is reinvested into CDBG or HOME eligible activities. i Contra Costa County FY 2003/04 CAPER 2 ............................................. S. Total Revenues and Expenditures in FY 2003/04-CDBG, HOME, HOPWA and ESG Tabu B- Revenues and Expenditures FY I Unexpended Total Expenditures End of Year Program 2003/04 FY 2003/04 1 Prier Year Prior Year' Revenues During FY Unexpended Allocation Pro am Income Balance Adjustments Available 2003/04 Balance CDBG Housing $2,104,500 $4,824,1141 $3,433,901 $0 $10,362,515 $4,903,111 $5,459,404 Economic 1 1 Development $631,350 $80,693; $702,2071 $710 $1,414,960€ $805,393 $609,567 Infrastructure/ Public Facilities $210,450 $25,000 $344,641 $0 $580,091 $225,664 $354,427 Public Service i (a $715,530 $0 $27,9781 ($710) $742,798 $734,485 $8,313 Administration $547,170 $0 $58,985 $0 $606,155 $555,780 $50,375 Total CDBG $4,209,000 $4,929,807 (b) $4,567,712 $0 $13,706,519 $7,224,4331 $6,482,086 HOME i Projects 1$2,987,646 $645,843 $5,122,579 $0 $8,756,068 $1,866,474; $6,889,5941 Administration $331,961 71 76084 764 $00 $488,485 14L_,2591 $67,2261 Total HOME '$3,319,607 $717,603 $5,207,343 $0 $9,244,55.3 $2,287,7331 $6,956,820 1 ESG Projects 1 $127,300 $0 $51,569 $0 $178,869 $135,5701 $43,299 Administration , J6..700 $0 _ L 0 $6,700 6 730' 30 , 1 Total ESC $134,000 $0 $51,569 $0 $185,5691 $142,300 $43,269! i HOPWA $481,3821 $0 $1,118,8121 $0 $1,600,194' $849,226 $750,968 Grand Total $8,143,989 $5,647,410 $10,945,436 $0 $24 736,835 $10,503,6921 $14,233,143 (c) (a) The.Public Service allocation of$715,530 includes$84,180 from Contingency. (b) CDBG program income of$4,929,807 includes$2,978,042 from the Grayson Creek float loan repayment. (c)$10.5 million of the unexpended balance is committed to projects not yet completed.In addition$2.7 million is set-aside in the CDBG Housing Development Assistance Fund(HDAF),$0.4 million in the HONE HDAF,$0.2 million in the First Time Homebuyer Revolving Loan Fund, and $0.3 million in the Small Business and N icroenterprise Revolving Loan Funds.Housing and Economic Development Assistance funds are made available to affordable housing and economic development projects that develop during the program year. Contra Costa County FY 2003/04 CAPER 3 C. Leveraging of Resources of FY 2003/04 Completed Projects In accordance with federal regulations and County policy,matching funds are required for projects that receive County CDBG, HOME and ESG program funds. CDBG funded projects are required to provide matching funds depending on the type of project sponsor or subrecipient. Projects implemented by nonprofit agencies are required to provide a minimum 10 percent match, public agency projects are required to provide a minimum 25 percent match, and for-profit projects are required to provide a 100 percent match. Projects receiving ESG funds are required to provide a 100 percent match. Matching funds for CDBG and ESG projects typically include other federal,state or local public and private fiends. The HOME program requires a 25 percent match from non-federal sources. While HOPWA funds do not require match,the County considers leveraging of additional resources in the allocation of HOPWA funds. Table C details the funds leveraged for each project completed during FY 2003/04. Table C- Leveraging of FY 2003/04 Completed Projects Housing County 1 Other Project/ ! CDBG/HOME/ ` ; CDBGiHOME/ Federal StateiLocal Private Other Funds Program HOPWA Funds Project ID ;HOPWA Funds Funds Funds Resources Total Total Leveraged 02 1 HM 11400,000 5,164,309 21,865,105 27,029,414 28,429,414 1931. 03 5 HSG 225,000 269,500 269,500 494,50 1.20, 03 6 HSG 1,226,744 1,226,744 0.00; 99 9 HSG 894,2181 234,421 234,421 1,128,639 0.26' 97 2 HSG j 36,438 36,438 0.00; i 02 10 HSG 98,000 176,043 176,043 274,043 1.80 03 10 HSG 36,000 7,000 7,000 43,000 0.19 03 12 HSG 40,000 4,576 4,576 44,576 0.1.1 ! 03 13 HSG 40,000 4,500 4,5001 44,500 0.11 Housing $3,996,4001 0 $5,574,773 $22,152,681 $27,727,45 S31,723,8541 86.94 Other Project/ t Federal State/Local Private Other Funds Program ` ESG Funds Project ID ESG Funds Funds Funds Resources Total Total Leveraged ! 02 01 ESG 5,000 71,500 111,440 69.560 252,500 257,500; 50.501 02 02 ESG i 10,0001 733.955 731494 1,467,4491 1,477,449 146.741 02 03 ESG 14,000 172,326 105,003 277,329 291,329 19.81 02 04 ESG 90,0001 20,000 1,513,740 1,533,740 1,623.740 17.04 02 05 ESG 12,1001 50,000 125,000 52,350 227,350 239,450 18.791 ESG $131,1001 8875,455 51,922,506 $960,407 83,758,368 83,889,4681 528.67; Contra Costa County FY 2003/04 CAPER 4 Public service Project/ County CDBG Other Federal State/Local Private Other Funds Program CDBG Funds Project ID I Funds Funds Funds Resources Total 'Total Leveraged 03 33 PS 19,000 33,000 0 179,140 212,140 231,140 11.17 03 34 PS 27,000 123,069 90,754 81,141 294,964 321,964 10.92 03 35 PS 13,180 30,918 0 6,005 36,923 50,103 2.80 03 36 PS 10,000 0 36,000 76,841 112,841 122,841 11.28 03 37 PS 103,500 115,840 471,969 0 587,769 691,269 5.68; 03 38 PS 15,000 0 0 8,385 8,385 23,385 0.56 03 39 PS 15,000 10,000 0 1,256,733 1,266,733 1,281,733 84.45 03 40 PS 19,989 9,640 0 _ 271,896 281,536 301,525 14.08 03 41 PS 10,000' 0 72,500 25,000 97,500 107,500 9.75 03 42 PS 11,750 30,880 0 7,380 38,260, 50,0101 3.26 1 03 43 PS 9,978 19,948 20,850 0 40,798 54,776 4.09 1 03 44 PS 12,994 16,998 45,650 0 62.648 751642 4.82 03 45 PS 13,000 136,239 294,009 219,429 649,677 662,6771 49.98 03 46 PS 12,000 0 51,500 195,500 247,000 259,000 20.58 03 47 PS 16,000 26,000 276,606 68,658 371,264 387,264 23.2 03 48 PS 16,000 84,220 0 9,780 94,000 110,000 5.88 03 49 PS 13,000 31,000 142,223 181,108 354,331 367,331 27.26 03 50 PS 11,000 0 200,134 0 200,134 211,134 18.19 03 51 PS 50,0001 0 0 59,837 59,837 109,837 1.20 03 52 PS 18,0000 38,800 60,087 98,887 116,887 5.49 03 53 PS 21,0001 0 207,490 189,533 397,023 418,023 18.91 03 54 PS 13,{]00 0 30,000 2,000 32,000 45,000 2.46 03 55 P S 15,0001 0 49,191 0 49,191 64,191 3.28 03 56 PS i 15,000' 0 8,094 0 8,094 23,094 0.54 03 57 PS 10,00q 40,000 0 109,310 149,310, 159,3101 14.93 03 58 PS 1 15,000 15,000 0 30,483 45,483 60,4831 3.03 03 59 PS 10,000 110,000 150,000 80,500 340,500 350,500' 34.05 03 60 PS 14,000 0 5,000 6,000 11,00.. 25,000 0.79 03 61 PS 20,000 20,000 49,123 59,943 129,066 149,066 6.45 03 62 PS -10,0001 5,000 0 0 5,000 15,000 0.50 03 63 PS 1 10,000 0 25,300 0 25,300 35,300 2.53 03 64 PS 14,000 9,500 0 42,104 5L604 65,604 3.69 03 65 PS ! 25,000 0 0 74,278 74.278 99,278 2.97 03 66 PS 9,999 60,600 918,008 51,344 1.029,952 1,039,951 103.01 03 67 PS 23,000 35,000 54,226 310,035 399,261 422.261 17.3 03 68 PS 16.840 0 598,647 22,880 621,527 638,367 36.91 1 03 69 PS 10,000 8,006 169,763 177,769 187.769 17.78 1 03 70 PS 9,896 4,500 2,625 3,419 10,544 20,440 1.07 03 71 PS 14,971 0 38,838 108,310 147,148 162,119 9.83 03 72 PS 14,000 0 10,500 33,000 43,500 57,500 3.11 03 73 PS 9,657 0 0 75,000 75,000 84,657 7.77 03 74 PS 17,731 49,580 0 38,825 88,405 106,136 4.99 Public Service 5734,485 $1024,898 $3 888 037 $4,113 647 $9,026 582 $9,761067 $12.291 Contra Costa County FY 2003/04 CAPER 5 Economic Uevelo meat i Project/ County CDBG Other Federal State/Local Private Other Funds Program i CDBG Funds Project ID Funds Funds Funds Resources Total Total 3 Leveraged 98 15 ED 90,000 0 47,886 0 47,886 137,886 0.531i 03 17 ED 57,813 35,1421 0 15,201 50,343 108,156 0.87 03 18 ED ' 73,170 01 80,724 14,034 94,758 167,928 1.301 1 03 19 ED 54,000 69,345 99,917 20,495 189,7571 243,757 3.511 03 20 ED ; 54;000 48,5251 12,352 85,242 146,119 200,11 2.711 03 21 ED 96,234 54,913 0 270,5601 325,4731 421,707 3.38 03 22 ED 67,253 72,857 250,000, 407,9861 730.8431 798,096 10.87 03 23 ED 105,300 384980 0 4,245 309;225 414,525 2.94 03 24 ED 120,000 76,000 0 150,816 226,816 346,81b 1.89 01 24 ED 03 26 ED 22,528 0 0 0 0 22,528 0.001 E Economic Development 5740;2971 $661,762 $490,879 $968,579 $2,121,2201 52,861,517 $2.871 InfraStructUrrel Pub/lc Fecillties i Project/ County CDBG Other Federal State/Local Private Other Funds Program CDBG Funds Project ID Funds Funds Funds Resources Total Total Leveraged 96 31 IPF 8,032 0 0 32,251 32,251 40,2831 4.021 97 28 98 20 IPF 1 21,7391 0 6,261 0 6,2611 28,139 0.291 1 02 29 IPF , 40,000 33,000 0 505.890 538,890 578,890 13.47° 02 7Q IPF 40,914 40,914 0 41000 44,914 85,828 0.21 03 28 IPF 23,960 01 33,814 1,135 34,949 58,909; 1.46 03 31 IPF 25,753 Q 55,447 0 55,447' 81,2001 2.15 Infrastructure/ Public Facilities $160,3981 $73,914 $95,522 $539,276 $708,7121 $869,1101 $4.42 Total_All Pro rams $5,762,680, X2,636,02 $11,973 7171 $28 732,590 ..$43,340 3 $49,103,0161 $7.52 Contra Costa County FY 2003/04 CAPER 6 Section III. CDBG Narrative A. Non-Housing Community Development A.1. Priorltylpoat assessment Non-housing community development activities are those that provide for a safe and livable environment as identified by the community. The County funds community development activities under three different categories;Economic Development,InfrastructurelPublic Facilities,and Public Service. The County is committed to allocating fiends that serve the needs of the lowest income and most disadvantaged residents. The Contra Costa Board of Supervisors has identified as a priority for the allocation of CDBC funds the needs of children/families and the homeless, those segments of the population that are the most at-risk and powerless. The Contra Costa Consolidated Plant identifies the following priorities for non-housing community development needs. Economic Development CD-1 Reduce the number of persons below the poverty level,expand economic opportunities for very-low and low-income residents and increase the viability of neighborhood commercial areas. Infrastructure/Public Facilities CD-2 Maintain quality recreational,public facilities and adequate infrastructure and ensure access to the mobility impaired. CD-3 Continue to address physical barriers to public facilities and infrastructure as required through the Americans with Disabilities Act Public Services CD-4 Homeless Services. Reduce incidence of homelessness and assist in alleviating the needs of the homeless. CD-5 Special Needs-Prevention: Ensure access to programs that promote prevention and early intervention related to a variety of social concerns such as domestic violence, HIV/AIDS, Substance Abuse,illiteracy,and other issues experienced by special needs populations. Contra Costa County FY 2003/04 CAPER 7 CD-6 Special Needs-Services: Ensure that opportunities and services are provided to improve the quality of life and independence for persons with special needs such as frail elderly, disabled persons, migrant farm workers, abused children, those with substance abuse problems, illiterate adults, battered spouses and persons with HIV/AIDS. CD-7 Communities: Target resources to underserved areas of the County to ensure that communities are safe and provide a high quality of life. CD-8 Families: Promote and support programs that assist families to be safe, stable and nurturing. CD-9 Seniors: Enhance the quality of life of senior citizens and enable them to maintain independence. CD-10 Youth: Increase opportunities for children/youth to be healthy,succeed in school and prepare for productive adulthood. A.Z. Accomplishments Appendix E describes the accomplishments achieved in the categories of Economic Development, Infrastructure/Public Facilities and Public Service. Table D —Summary of Community Development Accomplishments -- Economic Development Priority Deed Category— Actual Number Actual Number of Actual Number of Actual Number of of Businesses Persons Assisted Very-Low Income Low-Income Economic Development Assisted with Jobs Persons Assisted Persons Assisted with Jobs with Jobs Commercial-Industrial Rehabilitation 0 0 0 0 Commercial-Industrial Infrastructure 0 0 0 0 Other Commercial- Industrial Improvements 0 0 0 0 Micro-Ente rises 220 0 0 0 Other Businesses 0 0 0 0 Technical Assistance 0 0 0 0 Cather 'ob trainin ) 0 112 109 3 Contra Costa County FY 2003/04 CAPER 8 Table E —Summary of Community Development Accomplishments-- Infrastructure and Public Facilities Priority Need Category: Actual Number of Actual Number of Projects Completed Public Facilities Projects Assisted* Funded in Funded in previous FY 2003/04 ears Senior Centers Handicapped Centers Homeless Centers Youth Centers Neighborhood Facilities I I Child Care Centers 2 I Parks and/or Recreation Facilities l I 2 Health Facilities Parking Facilities Abused/Nelected Facilities AIDS Facilities Other Public Facilities I I Public Improvements Solid Waste Improvements FIood Drain Improvements Water Improvements Street Improvements Sidewalk Improvements(Curb Ramps} Sewer Improvements Asbestos Removal Other Infrastructure Improvements Bike Lane Other—ADA Transition Plan I Includes all projects approved for funding in FY 2003/04,but not necessarily completed in FY 2003/04. Contra Costa County FY 2003/04 CAPER. 9 Table F —Summary of Community Development Accomplishments — Public Service Actual Number of Priority Need Cate ory----Public Service Persons Served Households Served Senior Services 1,523 0 Handicapped Services/Disabled/HIV/AIDS 214 0 Youth Services 3,351 0 Transportation Services 0 0 Substance Abuse Services---Youth 155 0 Em2loyment Training(see Economic Development) 522 0 Crime Awareness 0 0 Fair Housing Counseling__ 0 0 Tenant Landlord Counseling 0 807 Child Care Services(see Youth Services) 0 0 Health Services 452 0 Other Public Services/Families 510 0 Accessibility Needs 0 0 Other Community Development-Food and Shelter 12,649 366 Energy Efficiency Improvements 0 0 Lead Based Paint/Hazards 0 0 Code Enforcement 0 0 Other: Misc. 194 0 B. Affordable Housing See Section IV HOME and CDBG Housing Narratives for discussion of affordable housing. C. Changes to the Program There were no changes to the CDBG program this year. D. Consolidated Plan Implementation/Certifications As indicated in the discussion on leveraging in Section ILD,the County diligently pursued resources identified in the annual Action Plan and Consolidated Plan. During FY 2003/04,the County supported efforts by local jurisdictions and nonprofit organizations to obtain additional federal resources for affordable housing development and programs and projects to assist the County's homeless populations by working with applicants to ensure consistency with the currently approved Contra Costa Consolidated Plan and providing the required certifications. The County has worked with the Housing Authority of the County of Contra Costa to ensure that its Five- Year and Annual PHA Plans are consistent with the Consolidated Plan. In addition to certifications, Community Development Department staff works with other County departments to coordinate efforts in providing comprehensive services and programs that assist in implementation of the Consolidated Plan goals. Contra Costa County FY 2003/04 CAPER 10 E. Displacement Narrative Priority in the allocation of funds is assigned to projects that do not involve permanent relocation. However,projects involving relocation may be funded if required to. eliminate unsafe or hazardous housing conditions; reverse conditions of neighborhood decline and stimulate revitalization of a specified area; and/or to accomplish high priority affordable housing projects. As specified in all Project Agreements and related loan documents,the County and project sponsors must adhere to the requirements of the uniform Relocation. Act (URA) in projects involving permanent or temporary relocation. In addition, wherever feasible, households and organizations will be offered the opportunity to remain in the project upon completion. The County has developed procedures for monitoring relocation activities to ensure full compliance with the URA. The procedures include: a pre-funding interview with a review of project sponsor capacity for carrying out relocation activities(e.g.,contracting with a qualified consultant, in-house staff experience); a mandatory subrecipient meeting that covers relocation requirements and procedures for reporting, and submission of relocation reports and copies of proper noticing throughout the relocation activities. During the program year, two projects required relocation activities. Below is the status of each project: * Garden Park Apartments--The:majority of the relocation activities have taken place. The project files are being monitored by County staff with the anticipation that all relocation requirements will be completed during FY 2004/05. A summary of the project's activities will be included in the FY 2004/05 CAPER. * Lakeside Apartments —Relocation activities began on this project in January 2004. The majority of the entitlement and relocation activities will occur in FY 2004/05.A summary of the project's activities and the HUD Form 40107 (for HOME funded projects)will be included in the FY 2004/05 CAPER. F. Neighborhood Revitalization — North Richmond Neighborhood Revitalization Strategy Area Accomplishments The North Richmond Neighborhood Revitalization Strategy Area(MRSA)was approved by HUD in August 1996. The purpose of the 14RSA is to create opportunities for economic self-'sufficiency through jobs and housing,viable neighborhood commercial areas,childcare,transportation,and safe streets. The County's intent has been to take a collaborative approach to making these opportunities a reality by working proactively with residents,the North Richmond Municipal Advisory Council,the County Redevelopment Agency,Employment and Human.Services,Community Services,Health and Sheriffs Departments,and con-ununity based organizations and businesses. The majority of projects originally identified in the MRSA have been completed and an update to the Plan has begun and is expected to be complete during FY 2004/05. The update will include an assessment of current conditions, establish new benchmarks and identify short-term and long-term goals to be achieved. Contra Costa Comity FY 2003/04 CAPER 11 NR5A The following programs originally identified in the NRSA continue to operate and provide services to the community of North Richmond. Both CDBG supported programs and non-CDBG supported programs are listed. • Neighborhood House of North Richmond Multi-Cultural Family and Senior Center(03-51-P ) continues to receive CDBG funding. The Center is host to a number of community meetings and events, and is home to a number of programs providing education and social services. CDBG funds are provided for operation and staffing of the Center. CDBG funds were also awarded (02-70-IPF) to make a number of improvements to the facility including making a number of accessibility improvements to the building. ■ The Service Integration Team(03-55-PS)provides case management and employment assistance to Cal Works clients and is administered by the County Administrators Office.This CDBG funded program attempts to remove substance abuse and mental health issues as a barrier to families striving to achieve economic self-sufficiency and optimal family functioning. During FY 2003/04, this program provided services to 93 residents of North Richmond, Bay Point and San Pablo. • The Verde School project(03-71-PS)sponsored by the Center for Human Development provides teachers and parent-staff the necessary tools to resolve conflicts in a peaceful.manner.Twenty-five students were trained to be peer mediators and 10 teachers/parent-staff participated in this program during the year. • The Verde School Sports, Citizenship and Fitness project (03-72-PS) sponsored by the Verde Partnership Garden/Tides Center attempts to increase academic achievement and reduce conflicts by teaching students to play cooperatively, manage emotions and solve problems by providing structured playground activities. A total of 330 'Verde students participated in this program. • The After School Outreach Performing Arts project(03-65-PS)sponsored by the East Bay Center for Performing Arts provides programs in music and dance to children at sites in North Richmond (Verde School) and San Pablo. A total of 201 students participated in these classes during the year. • Project YES(Youth Experiencing Success)(03-74-PS)sponsored by California State University, Hayward Foundation,Inc.provided tutoring and mentoring to Verde School students to improve skills in math, computers, grammar and literature,and conflict management skills. A total of 32 students participated in the program during the year. • Self-Sufficiency Through Licensed Family Day Care (03-17-ED) sponsored by the Cambridge Community Center provides opportunities for low-income women to develop in-home day care centers in North Richmond and Bay Point. • The Increase Your Business Success project(03-20-ED) sponsored by the West Contra County Business Development Center(BDC)provides technical assistance to microenterprises in West Centra Costa County FY.2003104 CAPER 12 County to improve businesses and create jobs. This year, 5 new businesses were provided assistance by the BDC. These businesses created 24 new jobs. • The Allied Health Career Ladders - HomeCare Healthcare Career Training project (03-21-ED) sponsored by Rubicon Programs provides training and placement services to low-income persons to develop careers in the health care profession. Though available to residents County-wide,the program has a strong west County focus. During the year,a total of 30 people were trained in the health care profession and placed in job. + The Working Parents Career Development Program(03-24-ED)sponsored by Rubicon Programs provides low-income non-custodial parents intensive career development services to help them achieve economic self-sufficiency and financial support to their children. During the year,a total of 23 persons were provided job development services and placed into jobs. • The North Richmond Youthbuild Program (03-23-ED) sponsored by Community Housing Development Corporation provides on-the-job training in the construction trades to very-low and low-income youth. During the year, a total of 53 youth were provided services. + The Weed and Seed program is operated out of the County Employment and Human Services Department and sponsored by the U.S.Department of Justice. The program supports an additional officer from the Sheriff's Department and youth employment and educational programs through local non-profits in both North Richmond and Rodeo. • The Promoting Safe and Stable Families program administered by the Employment and Human Services Department provides a variety of services to community residents through a collaboration of community-based organizations. Services include childcare,family planning,parenting classes, educational support groups, domestic violence counseling,youth activities and others. + The North Richmond Employment Collaborative managed by Neighborhood House of North Richmond provides employment services to area residents. • The Community Preservation Program,operated by the County Building Inspection Department, implements rental ordinances and safety code requirements for rental and vacant property in order to ensure safe and sanitary housing and property. C0177munityAction Plan The North Richmond community adopted a Community Action Plan (CAP) in April of 1999. The CAP is implemented by several committees composed primarily of community residents with support by county staff. It focuses on education, community appearance and safety, and economic development and employment.The updated.NRSA will incorporate the goals of the CAP and include the activities of the CAD's committees as it is developed. Contra Costa County FY 2003104 CAPER 13 Education • The County Service Integration Program works closely with parents, the principal and staff of Verde Elementary School to improve student attendance and participation. As a result, absenteeism has been reduced and monthly Average Daily Attendance (ADA) numbers have increased. • The District 1 Board of Supervisors office, the Federal Regional Council, and the West County Unified School District have worked closely together to identify programs and funding to enhance both the physical appearance of schools and educational opportunities for students. Community Appearance and Safety During FY 2003/04,construction drawings were completed for streetscape improvements along the Third Street/Filbert Street corridor(01-27-IPF). This is the main route linking unincorporated North Richmond with the City of Richmond and is a primary target area of the Redevelopment Agency for commercial development. The Phase 1 (from Chesley to Grove Avenue) improvements were completed in May 2004. The City of Richmond will also be installing improvements on a two-block area to the south. Economic development and Employment One objective of the CAP is to establish a Farmer's Market within the community. However, a traditional Farmer's Market proved to be infeasible for a variety of reasons. The community researched alternative approaches and the citizens committee approved the approach to establish a mobile farm stand with some of the produce grown at the Orin Allen Boys Ranch in East Contra Costa County and transported to various locations in North Richmond by van. In November 2003, an RFP was issued requesting proposals from nonprofits interested in managing and operating the farm stand. Earth Island Institute/EcoVillage Farm Center was selected as the operator and began bringing farm fresh produce to the North Richmond neighborhood in February 2004.Earth Island Institute used the CDBG funds to purchase a van to help transport the fresh produce from the suppliers to the neighborhood. Miscellaneous The following programs though not specific to North Richmond are available to North Richmond residents and businesses. All projects are ongoing and funded through the CDBG and HOME programs. • Housing Development Assistance Fund—HOME and CDBG funds are available for the purpose of funding eligible housing projects during the program year. • Rental Rehabilitation Program—CDBG resources are available throughout the program year for the purpose of rehabilitating rental housing affordable to low-income households. Since approval Contra Costa County FY 2003/04 CAPER 14 of the NRSA in 1990, 17 rental units affordable to low-income households in North Richmond have been rehabilitated through this program. • Neighborhood Preservation Program—Zero and low interest CDBG loans are available to owner occupants for home rehabilitation and renovation. Since approval of the MRSA, 15 units owned and occupied by very-low and low-income households in North Richmond have been rehabilitated through this program. • Small Business and Microenterprise Loan Program—CDBG funds are available to persons and small businesses intending to start a business or expand an existing one. The following are Redevelopment Agency activities that continue in North Richmond. • A feasibility analysis for a light industrial incubator sponsored by the Redevelopment Agency,was completed in FY 1997198. The analysis concluded that a machining and tooling incubator was viable. CDBG funding was allocated for Phase R of the incubator feasibility study in FY 1999/00 (project 99-12-ED). This Phase of the study includes verification of assumptions in the feasibility analysis,development of a business plan,securing financing,and identifying and acquiring land or existing structures for construction or rehabilitation to house the incubator. The Agency has identified a potential site and in March 2004 submitted a revised preapplication for financing to the U.S.Economic Development Administration, The EDA responded and requested additional information that was submitted in June 2004. A response from EDA is expected in October 2004. • The Redevelopment Agency has continued to implement its First Source Hiring Agreements for new businesses or new construction in North Richmond. The Agency maintains an Abatement Revolving Loan Fund,which is available to cure health.and safety violations. • The Redevelopment Agency, the Housing Authority of Contra Costa and Community Housing Development Corporation of North Richmond in joint application received a HUD Youth Build grant for the North Richmond community. G. Five-year Assessment The priorities and strategies established for non-housing community development activities in the Consolidated Plan are intended to improve the livability and viability of our communities. Activities considered for funding must meet priorities for economic development, infrastructure and public facility improvements, the needs of the homeless, seniors, youth, families and special needs populations, underserved communities, and historic preservation. The practice of the County is to serve a minimum of 75 percent very-low and low-income persons in the Public Service category.An average of approximately 95 percent of the total persons served in FY 2003104 were very-low and low income. Likewise,training and placement programs specifically target extremely low-and very-low income persons,which has resulted in nearly 90 percent of participants meeting target incomes. Table G details the significant progress the County has made in meeting its five-year goals for non- housing community development projects.Nineteen of the twenty-seven priorities have already been met or exceeded. Contra Costa County FY 2003104 CAPER 15 Contra Costa County FY 2003/04 CAPER 16 erm .n r � � ra" ® r4 L W M M ry 14 N ri fA G CJ ' v ry' W MEL Rr, S. s � +�y.'.+►ss � � �'+ � � �� � y��� � �t�3 &' � � �'' v� oma. � � � �� .., •� °ski r +�', � U C.1 •��+ �' .tea � tJ N �. � N '7 60 e! ,.� � � r � N C5 ar v: r• ri oo u-i ad u^, ri .., M M N O C � CL N � U N k M •�S d 6 M h 'C' } m v7 Nt eq U � W 10 00 77, rq Lu An d G M .fir N 4 Ob M,� N M V1 N � C M � M ri M M M h `•D e � Q r u'� z f-4 Y ` 3 a .•r eq 43 99 t' a y C cOi ` u a 5 � •a q y Q1 G y y � F. a' ic ddi C i r O lz Am i' 4 Y � 6 �„ �' C+ rj � q 5w � @ O n •� w 'y'' L y 1100 ss c n q C C ad £'. L" � w O vi q .�j C �3 w, � y 'O •� td Gs `G �, t7. � �n yG Y •' d L C '° dpi Y aj nom+ £ b im49 CL y ^� od OS Im dam. a a w u wOB "� rs V u O 6 q V I a al L4 4' C r u cb nom' $ s"ti' E `? w o wO w o 40- { a✓ � � � a � � � i �� yyU' � °" � � C7' � � � w w 8�' � w w € U •� x CC fXt, d m tYl '' w o7 Cl L� C ^a Gl O p Q Q sa as U U U U y ) C U U 65 V� N q N Ih O N C V1 !n � �c � •�C G7 U O r•• v, �1 ao <C 01 0+ '� W •. e7 o ry � rrl G3�n � � U U U U U � U w U U ,,,a Section IV. HOME and CDBG Housing Narratives The Contra Costa Consortium.Five-Year Plan establishes the following priorities for affordable housing programs and projects: H-1 Expand housing opportunities for lower-income households through an increase in the supply of decent, safe and affordable rental housing and rental assistance. H-2 Increase homeownership opportunities for lower-income households. H-3 Maintain and preserve the affordable housing stock. H-4 Improve the public housing stock. H-5 Adopt the Continuum of Care Plan as the overall approach to addressing homelessness in the Consortium. H-6 Assist the homeless and those at risk of becoming homeless by providing emergency,transitional, and permanent affordable housing with appropriate supportive services. H-7 Increase the supply of appropriate and supportive housing for special needs populations. H-8 Alleviate problems of housing discrimination. H-9 Remove constraints to affordable housing development. A. Allocation of Funds During FY 2003/04, the County allocated CDBG, HOME, HOPWA and ESG funds in a manner consistent with these objectives and strategies. These projects are summarized under the appropriate strategy/need in Appendix E. B. Match Contributions The HOME program incurred a match liability of$466,618 in FY 2003/04,and realized a total match of$5,753,738. Sources of match include the net present value of below market interest rate loans,the net present value of property tax waivers, and a$3.7 million land donation. See Appendix C for HOME match report, HUD-40107-A. Contra Costa County FY 2003/04 CAPER 19 C. MBE/WBE Analysis A minority and women owned business enterprise(MBE/WBE)outreach program was adopted by the Board of Supervisors as a component of the Consortium HOME Program and the County's Affordable Housing Program. Consortium and County MBE/WBE policies are discussed at the Countywide HOME information meetings and at individual meetings with developers awarded HOME funds. In addition,requirements concerning minority and women-owned business participation in Consortium- funded HOME projects have been incorporated into all HOME project agreement and loan documents. Subrecipients must advertise business and contracting opportunities in a manner that would provide maximum notification to minority and women-owned business enterprises. Further,Subrecipients are encouraged to utilize certification lists maintained by local public agencies. As indicated in the HUD-40107 farm (see Appendix C), projects completed during the CAPER reporting period include: ■ A total of 21 contracts and 31 sub-contracts • 11.54 percent of all contracts were with minority-owned business enterprises • 192 percent were with Asian/Pacific Islander-owned firms • 5.76 percent were with Hispanic-owned firms • 3.85 percent were with Black-owned firms ■ Minority-owned firms were awarded$501,670 in contracts/subcontracts representing 2.84 percent of the total contract amount • 7.69 percent of all contracts were with women-owned firms ■ Women-owned firms were awarded $76,491 in contracts/subcontracts. The Community Development Department will continue to work with project sponsors to improve the participation of minority and women-owned business in housing developments. D. On-site Inspections Federal regulations require the County to perform on-site inspections of a reasonable sample of rental housing units assisted with HOME funds in order to ensure continued compliance with Federal Housing Quality Standards. Projects with 26 or more HOME-assisted units must be inspected annually, projects with 5 to 25 units, every two years; and projects with up to 4 units, every three years. The Community Development Department (CDD) in consultation with the County's Building Inspection Department and the Housing Authority of Contra Costa County(HACCC)determined that the federal Housing Quality Standards (HQS) are the appropriate standards to use in annual compliance monitoring.All new construction and rehabilitation of housing in the County is completed in strict accordance with Uniform Building Codes. HQS is used to evaluate the condition of existing properties to ensure housing is maintained in a safe and sanitary condition. HACCC and CDD staff Contra Costa County FY 2003/04 CAPER 20 performed inspections of 10 to 15 percent of the HOME-assisted units for each monitored project. Copies of the inspection reports are maintained at the CDD offices. During the current reporting period, the County performed on-site inspections of 18 HOME- assisted projects. In addition to HOME projects,four CDBG-assisted housing projects were selected for monitoring. The following table summarizes onsite inspections conducted over the current reporting period. Table H — On-site Inspections Project Dame/ Number of Number of Number of Location I units inspected units assert units failed HOME Urban County Profmts Elaine Null-.Alves Lane/Ba Point 1 1 Pinole Grove/Pinole ! 5 5 DOME Consortium Pro`eets Antioch I-iillerest/Antioch 4 4 Aspen Court/Pacheco 2 2 CalderaPlace/Concord 2 2 Camara'Circle/Concord 3 2 Carquinez Vista Manor/Crockett 2 2 Church Lane/San Pablo 2 2 Coggins S lWe/Walnut Creek 5 5 Columbia Park Manor/ 5 5 Pittsburg Community Heritage Apt/ 3 3 Richmond East County Transitional Housing/ 2 2 Antioch Pinecrest Apartments/Antioch 2 2 Rile -Court/Concord 3 3 Sierra Gardens/Walnut Creek 3 3 Silver Oak/Oakley 2 2 Sycamore Place/Brentwood 3 3 Tice Oaks//Walnut Creek 2 2 Concurrent with the on-site inspections, CDD staff inspects tenant files to ensure the management company is complying with HOME program and County requirements. The review includes confirming proper income certification,correct rent and utility allowance calculations,and appropriate tenant lease provisions. EY Affirmative Marketing Please see Section VILC, Fair Housing and Appendix D for discussion on affirmative marketing. Contra Costa County FY 2003/04 CAPER 21 F. Actions to Address the Housing Needs of Special Needs Populations County actions to address housing needs of Contra Costa's special needs populations through the development of affordable housing are summarized in Appendix E, Housing Table (Priority H-7). All new residential construction projects funded with County resources are required to include units accessible to disabled populations.A minimum of five percent of all units built and all common areas must be accessible to mobility impaired persons and an additional two percent must be accessible to vision and/or hearing impaired persons. G. Slow Moving Projects During the current program year, Contra Costa made significant progress toward meeting its affordable housing goals. In measuring the County's accomplishments, it must be noted that the majority of funded housing projects are complex., involving new construction or acquisition and rehabilitation of multifamily housing and requiring multiple funding sources.In general,these projects require two to five years from initial development planning to completion and occupancy. In order to facilitate the ability of the project sponsor to obtain additional funding from other sources (e.g., LIHTCs, FHLB Affordable Housing Program, HUD 202 and 811), the County often commits resources relatively early in the process. Therefore, the number of units funded and completed with current resources is significantly less than the number funded and in development.The housing table in Appendix E includes projects that have been designated as delayed(or slow-moving). H. Displacement See the displacement discussion under Section III.E. L Accomplishments Appendix E contains a summary of FY 2003/04 completed and ongoing housing projects. The summary includes the race/ethnicity of those served and the number of Section 215 units.In addition, the Contra Costa County HOME Consortium is a high performing HOME participating jurisdiction in California according to HUD analysis. Contra Costa County FY 2003/04 CAPER 22 I Five-year Assessment Table I— Five-year Affordable Housing Goals and Accomplishments Completed Five- Completed Completed Completed Completed'Completed Toward i Projects Total year FY 00/01 FY 01/02 FY 02/03 FY 03/04 FY 04/05 Five-year Funded/ Completed/ Goal a a a a a Goal Underway Underway NMI on,W Large/Small Households-Rental 815 219 238 222 131 820 410 1230 Affordable at 0 to 30%AMI 55 35 6 14 18 73 63 136 Affordable at 31 to 50%AMI 610 125 146 75 35 381 166 547 Affordable at 51 to 80%AMI 150 5 $6 133 88 366 181 547 Senior Housing-Rental 480 152 36 213 401 225 626 Affordable at 0 to 30%AMI 5010 0 58 68 31 99 Affordable at 31 to 50%AMI 370 91 35 133 259 182 441 Affordable at 51 to 80%AMI 60 51 1 22 74 12 86 ROOM; Mgii Affordable at 0 to 30°lo AM1 �=5j 7 4 11 i l Affordable at 31 to 50%AMI 85 47 58 43 13 161 23 184 Affordable at 51 to 80%AM 294 40 50 32 16 34 203 Fair Housing Counseling 450 60 60 33 42 195 195 Fair Housitt Legal Assistance 500 90 98 98 100 38 386 Emergency Shelter Beds NA 20 0 100 120 120 Transitional Housing- 3 ApartmentsN 0 20 0 23 23 Permanent,su rtive HousingNA 0 0 011 0 281 28 (a)Includes completed projects funded with CHBG,HOME,HOPWA,County Redevelopment Agency funds,bands,and MCCs. (b)Includes units reserved for mentally and/or physically disabled households not included in totals for rental and homeowner units. (c)Total housing units equals the sum of rental housing units,homeowner units and special needs housing. (d)Fair housing and homeless shelter facilities not included in total housing units. (e)In FY 2002/03 the method of reporting fair housing counseling changed.There were 345 households assisted over the phone with fair housing corn laints and 42 investigations in FY 2003/04. Contra Costa County FY 2003/44 CAPER 23 Section V. HOPWA Narrative—HIV/AIDS Activities County Community Development and Health Services Department staff meet periodically to identify and address the housing and housing-related service needs of low-income persons with HIV/AIDS in Contra Costa. Activities during FY 2003/04 include inter jurisdictional planning efforts to evaluate project proposals, refinement of the current referral process for affordable HIV/AIDS housing, and provision of technical assistance to current and potential developers of affordable housing and related services for persons with HIV/AIDS. The County HIV/AIDS Program allocated $1,811,090 in FY 2003/04 HOPWA and Ryan White CARE funds for the following services which address the needs of low-income persons with HIV/AIDS in Contra Costa:$691,596 for case management,$97,711 for emergency housing and other assistance,$187,900 for food,$90,000 for housing advocacy,and$743,883 for other support services such as mental health, substance abuse, client advocacy, transportation, nutritional counseling, and legal services. In addition,Contra.Costa apportions approximately 20 percent of its HOPWA allocation to the Contra Costa Health Services Department (HSD) to provide housing advocacy services to persons with HIV/AIDS.The balance is used for acquisition/rehab and new construction of affordable housing for persons with HIV/AIDS. All funds are awarded to subrecipients on a competitive application basis. During FY 2003/04,HSD allocated$110,040 in HOPWA funds to Catholic Charities of the East Bay and Shelter,Inc.to provide housing advocacy and assistance services,including client intake,housing needs assessment,assistance with locating affordable housing,assistance with housing-related benefit applications,development and implementation of client housing plans,emergency housing assistance funds, follow-up to ensure receipt of benefits and housing, and referral to other services. There was no allocation of HOPWA housing development funds during the fiscal year.It is expected that two allocations of housing development funds will be awarded in FY 04/05. See also Appendix E for Public Service and HOPWA projects that target individuals with HIV/AIDS. Contra Costa County FY 2003/04 CAPER 24 _ ..................................... Section VI. ESG Narrative Contra Costa County receives an annual allocation of federal Emergency Shelter Grants(ESG)funds through HUD. In FY 2003/04, the County received $134,040 in ESG funds, which, in turn, were allocated to eligible agencies on a competitive application basis. Proposed projects were evaluated based on several criteria including consistency with the Contra Costa Consolidated Plan and the Continuum of Care Plan. These plans identify priorities and specific actions to alleviate homeless needs in Contra Costa. Additional information on actions to address the needs of the homeless population in Contra Costa can be found in Section VILE Continuum of Care Plan,and Appendix E, Public Service projects and ESG projects. Contra Costa County FY 2003/04 CAPER 25 Section VII. General Narratives A. Five-year Assessment See Tables G and J for the five-year assessment. B. Location of Projects (Investments) and Public Participation (Beneficiaries) See Appendix A for a status of projects including location and project beneficiaries. C. Fair Housing Over the past year, the County continued working to overcome or eliminate impediments to fair housing choice identified in the Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice(Al).The specific Al recommendations addressed this year are as follows: Action 2.1 - Through the Consolidated Plan and one-year Action Plan, the Consortium should continue to allocate resources to encourage and facilitate the development of affordable housing throughout the entire Consortium.Also,adequate resources should continue to be allocated to provide fair housing education and outreach efforts. In FY 2003104, resources were allocated to develop 174 new units of affordable housing in different regions of the County. In addition, resources were provided for multi family and single-family rehabilitation programs,first time homebuyer programs, andfair housing counseling, legal services, and outreach (See Appendix E). Action 4.1 - The County and cities continue to collaborate to expand affordable housing in communities where such opportunities are limited. In FY 2003104, Victoria Green Apartments (132 units) was completed in the City of Hercules. This community has limited affordable housing opportunities. Action 5.1 - Participating jurisdictions should consider offering additional regulatory and financial incentives to facilitate the development of affordable housing. During the program year, a density bonus was granted to Kaufman and Broad for a 173 unit single- family project in the unincorporated community of forth Richmond, Action 6.1 -Continued efforts to expand the transit zone and to coordinate employment opportunities and housing for transit-dependent persons along transit corridors should be encouraged. The recently completed Victoria Family Apartments in the City of Hercules is located near transit. Action 7.1 - Fair housing service providers should continue to expand outreach to the community regarding fair housing rights. Contra Costa County FY 2003/04 CAPER 26 ............................... Housing Rights, Inc. and Bay Area Legal Aid hosted a series of outreach workshops throughout the program year. Housing Rights also conducts outreach through public service announcements, distribution of fliers, and a poster contest in local schools. The outreach strategy of.l ousing Rights includes an emphasis on immigrant populations. Action 7.2-Participating jurisdictions and fair housing service providers should identify community events to promote diversity and tolerance. The County and the City of Brentwood sponsored an Affordable Housing Resource Fair to provide County residents with information about affordable housing opportunities and fair housing services. Action 8.1 - The Consortium should encourage the fair housing service providers to develop one brochure to describe fair Dousing services offered by the three service providers,including geographic areas covered by the service providers and contact information. This effort was completed in FY 2003/04.County staff worked with the fair housing service providers to develop a comprehensive brochure. Action 9.1 - Fair housing service providers should work collaboratively to develop a format for reporting fair housing services that cann allow compilation of data to assess trends and patterns. Consortium members worked with the fair housing service providers to develop a supplement to the standard quarterly report form that will better assess trends and patterns of housing discrimination. Action 10.1 - The Consortium and fair housing service providers should consult with lenders to explore ways to improve access to financing for all. The Mortgage Credit Certificate program reserves 40 percent of its allocation for households with incomes at or below 80 percent of area median income. Lenders have been cooperative with this program, and 32 Mortgage Credit Certificates were provided to low-income households in the last fiscal year. D. Affordable Housing See Section IV HOME and CDBG Housing Narratives. E. Continuum of Care County actions to address the needs of homeless populations through the allocation of FY 2003/04 CDBG and ESG sources are discussed in Sections III and VI. Accomplishments in the provision of housing reserved for and/or affordable to the homeless and those at risk of becoming homeless is discussed in Section IV. The following discusses additional activities undertaken by the County and Contra Costa Continuum.of Care Board(CoCB)to address the needs of homeless populations during FY 2003/04. During FY 2003/04, the County continued to implement strategies and projects consistent with the Contra Costa Consolidated Plan and the 2001-20016 Contra Costa County Homeless Continuum of Care Pian. In recognition of the priority assigned by the latter pian to the preservation of existing Contra Costa County FY 2003/04 CAPER 27 housing and services for the homeless,over $7.7 million in federal McKinney Act resources were allocated to maintenance of the existing inventory of emergency and transitional housing and support services for homeless populations. Specific projects funded with McKinney Act resources are listed in Table K. Additional resources allocated to the maintenance of existing homeless programs include$5,590,090 in County General Fund resources for continued operation of the West County Emergency Shelter and the Central County Emergency Shelter and for supportive services for persons in permanent supportive housing,and$596,000 in FEMA resources used to provide emergency shelter,food,emergency rental assistance and other assistance to homeless populations. The Board of Supervisors approved and adopted Ending Homelessness in Ten Years:A County-Wide Plan for the Communities of Contra Costa County on June S, 2004. The Plan emphasizes our intention to end chronic homelessness,the necessity of tapping mainstream resources, our shift to a Housing First strategy, and the necessity of supporting residential stability with integrated services continuously available. Contra Costa County FY 2003/04 CAPER 28 Table 7— McKinney Act Funded Projects Project Name Sponsor Description McKinney Funds Shelter Iglus Care Contra Costa County Permanent housing(rental $747,120 4 Housing Authority assistance)with services for ! HACCC those with a disabfi!ty Moving Out of I, STAND!Against Domestic Transitional housing with $100,571 Violent Environments j Violence support services for battered women and their children. CCC Transitional SHELTER,Inc.of Contra Transitional housing with $457,371 Housing Pro Costa Coun support services for families Project Independence Rubicon Programs,Inc. Transitional housing with $653,005 ! supportive services Transitional Housing STAND! Against Domestic Transitional housing with $141,973 and Employment Violence support services for battered Center ! women and their children. Idaho Apartments Rubicon Programs,Inc. Permanent supportive housing $304,279 for homeless persons with a disabili West Richmond Rubicon Programs,Inc. Permanent supportive housing $44,013 Apartments for homeless persons with a disability Garden Parks Contra Costa Health Services Permanent supportive housing $224,870 Apartment for families community Pittsburg Family I SHELTER,Inc.of Contra Transitional housing with $80,797 Center ! Costa County support services for families ' with children. Transitional Housing SHELTER,Inc.of Contra Transitional housing with E $273,584 i Partnership Costa County support services for individuals and families with a disabili Reach Plus ; SHELTER,Inc.of Contra Scattered site transitional i $724,504 Costa County housing with support services. FERST Contra Costa County Multi-service center providing $248,547 De artment of Health Services diverse services to homeless. Money Management Rubicon Programs Housing assistance to homeless $204,120 adults with severe psychiatric € disabilities and substance abuse i problems. West County Greater Richmond Interfaith Multi-service center providing $168,044 Resource Center Program diverse services to homeless. Access Phoenix Program,Inc. Permanent housing and wrap- $509,906 i around services to homeless i with severe mental illness I Shelter Flus Care#I HACCC See Shelter Plus Care above I $1,611,648 Shelter Plus Care#2 HACCC See above I $1,180,440 Shelter Plus Care#3 HACCC See above $I74,352 Contra Costa County FY 2003/04 CAPER 29 Other Actions to Assist the Homeless In FY 2003/04 the County opened a transitional living program for youth ages 18-21. Six beds are available to young men and women who are homeless and/or emancipating from foster care. The County is working with the City of Pinole to identify a site and resources for the development of a permanent supportive housing facility in West County.The Shelter-Plus Care Program was successful in providing rental assistance to stabilize the housing situation of 116 homeless individuals and 69 families. This year, Contra Costa County received one of 11 grants awarded nationwide by a federal interagency effort on homelessness. This prestigious grant funds Project Coming Horne(PCH), a multi-agency collaborative effort to provide integrated outreach,treatment, housing, and supportive services to chronically homeless individuals. F. Other Actions F.1 Actions to address obstacles to meeting underserved needs The County's efforts to increase and maintain the supply of affordable housing and to meet the objectives identified in the Consolidated Plan described in the general narrative sections of this report are all directed to meeting underserved needs. In addition, the criteria for target population and alleviation of affordable housing needs employed in the allocation of HOME and CDBG funds for housing establish a priority for projects which reserve a portion of the units for extremely-low income and/or special needs populations. F.2 Actions to foster/maintain affordable housing See affordable housing discussions in Section IV. F.3 Actions to eliminate barriers to affordable housing Market factors such as the high cost of suitable for residential development and high construction costs continue to be the most significant constraints on the development of affordable housing in Contra Costa. The County attempts to counter these factors with strategies and subsidy programs to develop affordable rental housing and homeownership opportunities (See Section IV). Additional actions undertaken by the County to decrease development costs and eliminate barriers to affordable housing include the following: • The County has a density bonus ordinance to permit increased densities for housing developments that include units affordable to low-income households. • The County continues to use Planned Unit Development (P-1) zoning to streamline the development process and permit the use of flexible design standards for projects with an affordable or special needs housing component. Contra Costa County FY 2003/04 CAPER 30 • The County also provides expedited plan review and permit processing, flexible design standards, and deferred or reduced fees for affordable housing projects in County redevelopment areas on a case-by case basis. F4 Actions to overcome gaps in the institutional structure The County Community Development Department continues to provide technical assistance to area non-profits to build capacity and assist in the development of programs and projects designed to meet the County's Consolidated Plan objectives through individual meetings and workshops held during the program year. Further,the Department works with non-profits to achieve designation as a Community Housing Development Organization(CHDO)and/or Community fused Development Organization (CBDO) for purposes of participating in the Consortium HOME and County CD13G affordable housing programs. FS Actions to improve public housing and resident initiatives Section 8/Housing Choice Vouchers For the FY 2004/05 the total resource for the Section 8 program was $76,796,257 The Housing Authority's aim is to administer the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program to permit the widest range of housing opportunities for low-income Contra Costa County residents. To help meet this goal, the Housing Authority has sub-programs that target special populations and neighborhood revitalization efforts. A description of these programs is provided below. • Housing Choice Voucher Program(HCV) The Housing Authority Housing Choice Voucher program currently administers 6,781 vouchers. This number represents a 100 percent utilization of its baseline unit allocation. The Housing Choice Voucher waitlist has over 3,100 Families. • The Fancily Self Sufficiency Program(FSS) FSS combines housing assistance and social services to enable families to pursue employment,job training, or other education that will lead them toward self-sufficiency. The ultimate goal is to free families from public assistance after five years. A Family Self Sufficiency Action Plan has also been adopted by the agency and forwarded to HUD. The Housing Authority has over 2.83 families participating in the FSS program of which 51 percent have escrow balances that could be used toward down payment on a house. • Shelter Plus Care(SPC) This program provides rental assistance and a full range of services to homeless individuals who are mentally ill, have chronic alcohol or drug abuse problems, or have AIDS or related disorders. A broad base of community service providers and the County Health Department supports the program. The Housing,Authority's Shelter Plus Care program currently provides housing assistance to over 200 individual/families. In addition we are now providing rental assistance services for Project Coming home. Project Coming Home is a unique grant that provides specific housing and services to indigent/homeless singles. Contra Costa County FY 2003/04 CAPER 31 • Moderate Rehabilitation Program(MR8) This program providedproject-based subsidized rental assistance to eligible tenants for a time negotiated by the property owners in a contract with HUD and administered by the Housing Authority. As contracts expire, residents are eligible to convert their project-based assistance to tenant-based Section 8 vouchers, as funding is available. • Project Based Assistance (PBA) The Housing Authority of the County of Contra Costa(HACCC)has set aside 150 project- based Section 8 vouchers for newly constructed residential properties. HACCC has selected six developers based on the merits. Of these four projects are new construction and two are rehabilitation. Each Developer/Owner of a selected property will be required to obtain a permanent Certificate(s)of Occupancy, and to bring the property into compliance with the Housing Quality Standards (HQS) of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development(HUD). The project-based Section 8 units may receive subsidy for the term of a Housing Assistance Payment(HAP) contract(currently the maximum term is ten years, extensions thereafter may be provided by HACCC) between the owner and HACCC. The HAP contract is subject to annual congressional appropriations. Capital Funding Program (CFP) Drug Elimination The Housing Authority received $314,239 in FY 2003/04 HUD funds to operate a comprehensive Drug Elimination Program(PHDEP) at its Rodeo and North Richmond public housing developments. Activities supported include community-oriented policing to reduce drug traffic, economic self-sufficiency services (e.g., life skills, computer training,job development)and children educational opportunities(Tiny Tots [Look, Listen &Learn]; Homework Club and Harry Potter Reading Club,etc.). These activities have been supplemented through formal establishment of"Weed& Seed Safe Havens" at the YMCA in Rodeo (30—45 children are served daily) and through the Project PRIDE recreation program(70—90 children are provided services daily) and collaborative efforts with Neighborhood House Community Center in North Richmond. Safe Haven programs include computer training,drug prevention workshops, cooking class, arts and crafts, conflict resolution, sport, and other recreational activities. PHDEP programs for the FY 2003/04 is still being funded by the 2001 Drug Elimination grant. The federal government has eliminated the PHDEP program. The HACCC will continue to fund the operation of the comprehensive Drug Elimination Program.. However, support for community- oriented policing has been reduced. Without the PHDEP funds, HACCC will only be able to support one Deputy, rather than two full-time positions. Presently, 2/3 of the PHDEP grant goes toward law enforcement, and 1/3 toward drug prevention activities, such as Project PRIDE and the YMCA. Contra Costa County FY 2003/04 CAPER 32 Employment The Housing Authority is still under Contract with Rubicon to facilitate their Project Employ job readiness program at both Las Deltas in North Richmond and El Pueblo in Pittsburg. This program has been modified to include pre-employment skills training,job placement and case management. Residents from both Rodeo and Pittsburg have been assisted by Project Employ this year. Residents have been permanently hired at various jobs, or are in some form ofjob training or receiving some other type of employment support(substance abuse counseling, child care or transportation assistance). In the upcoming year, Pittsburg and North Richmond public housing residents will be targeted for enrollment in Project Employ. The Comprehensive Apprenticeship Self-Sufficiency and Entrepreneurship (CASE)program is a public/private partnership providing ladders to career success in the painting industry for public housingresidents. The Contra Costa Housing Authority collaborated with Cypress Mendela/WIST and Painters and Tapers Union to establish this program for public housing residents interested in careers as painters. Candidates received pre-apprenticeship training to establish job readiness, including work norms, physical capacity, improving self-knowledge,and being drug free. As required under the terms of the contract established by the Housing Authority, a local painting contractor working on painting a public housing development was required to hire pre- apprenticeship graduates as trainees. Upon completion, successful trainees were guaranteed acceptance into the union's apprenticeship program,job placement and ultimately, a career in the painting,industry. Youth Activities The Housing Authority continued to work with the Police Activities League to operate a computer learning center at the Alhambra public housing development in Martinez. The purpose of the program is to provide training and employment skills for local teenage residents. Youthbu ld HUD's Youthbuild program has made awards for a North Richmond project sponsored by the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency and the Dousing Authority. Its primary aim is training local youths in self-sufficiency trade skills and completion of high-school level education equivalency. Participant will significantly rehabilitate three homes that will be sold to a low- income family. To facilitate this project, HACCC obtained HUD approval to donate three properties with deteriorated buildings that may be rebuilt or replaced. Training and construction work is proceeding nicely under the guidance of a local non-profit contracted by the Redevelopment Agency. F.6 Actions to alleviate lead-based paint hazards The County has incorporated the requirements of the lead-based paint regulations (24 CFR Part 35) into its affected programs, including the homeowner and rental rehabilitation programs. These programs developed implementation plans that include procedures to test for lead-based paint, determine a scope of work to address lead-based paint hazards, ensure qualified contractors are performing the required work, and obtain a clearance examination at project completion. Contra Costa County FY 2003/04 CAPER 33 The County's Neighborhood Preservation Program and the City of San. Pablo's homeowner rehabilitation program provide grants to homeowners who have received rehabilitation loans and need to abate lead hazards. F.7 Act7ons to ensure compliance with program and planning requirements F7,a Housing Projects and Programs The Contra Costa County Community Development Department is responsible for administration of the following federally funded programs to provide assistance for the development of affordable housing and homeless shelters;CDBG,HOME,ESG,and HOPWA.All projects funded through these programs are monitored by the Department to ensure that the projects achieve their approved objectives in a manner consistent with federal regulations, the Consolidated Plan, and other local planning requirements. The Department's monitoring process consists of the following. • Prior to funding consideration,all project applications are reviewed to ensure consistency with federal regulations, the Consolidated Plan and County Housing Element. • All project sponsors receiving an allocation of CDBG, HOME, ESG or HOPWA funds are required to enter into Project Agreements which specify project objectives, scope of work, eligible activities, performance targets,project budget, implementation time frame, federal regulatory requirements',and monitoring and reporting requirements. In addition,all housing development funds are provided to projects in the form of a loan, with applicable federal regulations, and affordability and use restrictions incorporated into the loan documents and effective throughout the term of the loan. • Following approval of FY 2003104 funding allocations for CDBG and HOME, a mandatary meeting was held with all project sponsors to discuss County Affordable Housing Program and federal regulatory requirements. An overview of the contracting and project implementation process was followed by presentations on CDBG/HOME Project Agreements, regulatory requirements, project loan documents, federal environmental review procedures, documentation and procedures required for payment, and monitoring and reporting requirements. • During project implementation, project sponsors are required to submit quarterly progress reports detailing project progress, significant development problems, project funding and expenditures,outreach to women and minority-owned businesses,and affirmative marketing activity. In addition, projects are monitored as applicable for compliance with federal accounting and procurement standards, labor and construction standards, relocation, affirmative marketing, equal opportunity, fair housing, and other federal requirements. 'Includes compliance with federal regulations concerning;:equal opportunity and fair housing;affirmative marketing;displacement, relocation and acquisition; Davis-Bacon labor standards; lead-based paint; conflict of interest; federal debarment and suspension; environmental requirements;historic preservation;and flood insurance. Contra Costa County FY 2003104 CAPER 34 + Following project completion, project sponsors are required to submit Project Completion Reports identifying:project accomplishments;papulation served,including data on household characteristics(e.g.,income,ethnicity);rent and/or housing affordability;and total sources and uses of funds. + Affordable housing development projects(e.g.,acquisition,rehabilitation,new construction) must also submit annual compliance reports designed to ensure continued compliance with federal regulations,affordability and use restrictions,and other requirements as specified in the project loan documents. In addition,all HOME-assisted projects are subject to periodic onsite inspections to ensure continued compliance with federal housing quality standards. F7b Non-Housing Community Development Projects and Programs Monitoring procedures for non-housing projects and programs are similar to those described for housing projects and programs. + Prior to funding consideration, all applications are reviewed for consistency with federal regulations;the Consolidated Plan, and Board of Supervisor policy. + Fallowing funding approval, project sponsors are required to enter into Project Agreements which specify: project objectives; scope of work; applicable time lines and performance targets;project budget; federal, state,and local regulatory requirements; and monitoring and reporting requirements. + During project implementation, project sponsors are required to submit quarterly progress reports detailing: project progress toward objectives; problems encountered and their resolution; and quantitative participation data, by ethnicity, income, and household status. Projects are also subject to an onsite performance and financial audit review on a selective basis. Priority is given to high-risk programs for onsite performance and/or audit review. + Quarterly reports and requests for payments are reviewed for both compliance with the Project Agreement and proper documentation for eligible activities. Project sponsors are advised of any procedural errors and or ineligible activities. • Upon project completion,project sponsors are required to submit Project Completion Reports identifying program/project accomplishments, quantitative participation data or population served, and total sources and uses of funds. F.8 Actions to reduce the number ofpeople llving in poverty The movement of people above the poverty line involves a variety of policies and programs that extend beyond providing opportunities for employment at a living wage. Access to education, transportation,childcare,and housing are key components that can assist persons to secure and retain economically self-sustaining employment. The County employs a variety of strategies to help alleviate poverty in the Urban County, including efforts to stimulate economic growth and job opportunities, Contra Costa County FY 2003/04 CAPER. 35 and to provide Urban County residents with the skills and abilities required to take advantage of those opportunities. In FY 2003/04 the CDBG program provided funds for four job training and placement programs: • Allied Health Career Ladders Training Project (03-21-ED) provided Certified Nursing Assistant training and placement for persons to begin a health career or improve on their current job status. • Working Parents Career Development Program (03-24-ED) provided job development and placement services to low income non-custodial parents. • Opportunities for Technology Information Careers Project(03-22-ED)provided training and placement for persons to establish careers in computer technology. • North Richmond Youthbuild Program(03-23-ED)provided on the job training and education to 53 very low-income youth. Cal WORKS, California's response to the Workforce Development Act of 1998, has altered the structure and function of the public social service delivery system. The new system emphasizes outcomes,the value of work and the duty of government to support its citizens in their self-sufficiency efforts. The County's implementation of Cal WORKS has been constructed with the purpose of going beyond "welfare reform" to building models that integrate services, leverage funding and share expertise across agencies.Contra Costa County,in partnership with the Workforce Investment Boards from the City of Richmond, Alameda, and Oakland has formed a collaborative known as "Eastbay Works". Presently there are 14 East Bay One Stop and Career Centers,more commonly known as One Stops; six of which specifically serve the needs of Contra Costa residents. One Stops are located in Richmond, Hilltop Mall (also in the City of Richmond), Concord, Pittsburg, Brentwood and San Pablo. The North Richmond Employment Collaborative opened in November of 1998 and provides employment services primarily to residents of North Richmond and surrounding communities,and is electronically linked to the One Stop facilities. In addition, Bay Point Works Community Career Center provides employment services to residents of Bay Point. The East Bay One Stop and Career Centers offer services to the universal population that include targeted services for those who are presently receiving Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF)funds. In addition to Job Training Partnership Act funds,the Workforce Investment Boards receive Welfare to Work formula grants and have secured competitive grants to provide enhanced services and expanded training options for this population. Services are available for eligible individuals and include in-depth assessment, team case management, training, job placement assistance, and development of skills leading to higher wage earnings. Cal WORKS clients also have an option to participate in a child care training program,carried out in cooperation with the Regional Occupation Program(ROP)from the County Office of Education,Los Medanos College and adult schools in each area of the County. Clients earn six ROP units,which can be transferred to Los Medanos College towards an Early Childhood teaching credential.The program staff teach classes in Spanish and provide ESL classes. Participants in the program have attained Contra Costa County FY 2003/04 CAPER 36 employment in childcare enters (including Head Mart), in private homes as nannies, or were successful in securing other types of employment. During FY 2003/04, the Contra Costa County Transportation Alliance provided the following programs. • Vehicle Loan and Auto Donation program to provide Cal Works participants with low cost vehicles. • Demand-Response Transportation program to guarantee participants a ride to work.This program began in September 2001 and continues to expand. • The Children's Transportation Program that provides bus service to and from school and childcare for children of Cal. Works families continues to be successful. Currently there are nine buses operating daily with a long waiting list for this service. In addition,the Alliance continues to work closely with local service providers and County agencies to expand bus service in low-income areas. Opportunities for microenterprise and small business development ,are facilitated through a Small Business and Microenterprise Loan Program(03-26-ED)sponsored by the County's CDBG Program. The purpose of the program is to stimulate local economic growth by providing loans and technical assistance to microenterprises and small businesses. Two childcare training programs(03-17-ED and 03-18-ED)assist low-income persons in establishing themselves as in-home childcare providers to achieve economic self-sufficiency through self- employment. A number of affordable housing programs funded by the County provide housing opportunities for extremely-low and very-low income households. For a more complete discussion of housing opportunities available, see Section IV. Appendix E provides a list of all economic development projects funded in FY 2003/04. G. Leveraging See Table C. H. Summery of Citizen Comments The CAPER.was noticed in accordance with federal requirement on September 13,2004 in the Contra Costa Times,Vilest County Times,and San Ramon Valley Times. A notice was posted in the County administration building on the 1'and 0 floors,and published in the Board of Supervisors Agenda of September 28, 2004. The draft CAPER was also available online at the Redevelopment Agency's website (www.ccreach.org). Contra Costa County FY 2003/04 CAPER 37 i I. Self-Evaluation: Progress in Meeting Consolidated Plan Goals As demonstrated by the preceding discussion,the County is making significant progress in meeting the goals and objectives contained in the Five-fear Consolidated Plan. Nineteen of the twenty-seven identified priorities have been met or exceeded. During FY 2043/04, CDBG-funded public service projects provided a wide range of social services to over 20,000 Urban County residents and households, including the homeless,mentally and physically disabled, seniors,battered women and children, and other special needs populations. Economic development programs offer training and placement services for extremely-low and very-low income persons and assist in the creation and expansion of small businesses. Infrastructure/Public Facilities projects have resulted in a variety of infrastructure and accessibility improvements. County affordable housing programs in combination with other resources were successful in increasing the supply of rental and ownership housing for low-income households. These projects are summarized in Appendix E. Due primarily to high housing,prices,first-time homebuyer assistance programs have little production. High housing prices require subsidies to assist low-income households in purchasing a home that generally exceed acceptable per unit subsidy levels. While the County's accomplishments are significant, problems persist in timely implementation of some programs and projects.Affordable housing projects often experience significant delays between the initial commitment of County funds and completion. These delays relate to the complexity of housing finance and the ability of project sponsors to obtain the remaining resources required to fully fund a project. In order to compete effectively for major funding sources such as nine-percent LIHTCs, tax-exempt bond funds, HUD Section 202/811, and State Housing Programs, project sponsors must have firm funding commitments from local jurisdictions. The high demand for affordable housing resources of all types combined with the limited supply offends has resulted in an extremely competitive financing environment in Contra Costa County and the Bay Area,potentially causing lengthy delays in the completion of affordable housing projects. Delays in project implementation in the current construction environment also result in increased project costs,requiring supplemental funding from the County and other sources of financing. The County,on behalf of the HOME Consortium,is extremely pleased with its high evaluation in the "HOME Program Performance SNAPSHOT."The Consortium is ranked number two in the State of California and in the 93rd percentile in its group. Historically the County's infrastructure projects have been very slow moving. However,once started they typically take up to eighteen months to complete. Once again this year, staff gave considerable focus to the infrastructure category this year to close outstanding projects, and ensure viable current projects. During this year, six of the thirteen open/new projects were completed. During the application process,staff scrutinized each of the timelines submitted,and included contingencies for timeliness in funding recommendations. Contra Costa County FY 2003/04 CAPER 38 _.. As discussed in preceding years, there is ongoing concern about the long-term capacity of the non- profit community providing services in Contra Costa County and their ability to comply with often complex federal regulations and requirements in implementing federally funded programs. Contributing factors include the relatively low pay scale associated with non-profits leading to high staff turnover and a lack of resources for ongoing training and professional development.In an effort to address this issue,the County continued to provided technical assistance to non-profit organizations receiving County CDBG and HOME funds,including workshops on contracting,budget and payment requests, federal regulations and other County requirements. The County and the other CDBG jurisdictions(Consortium)continued the process of consolidating processes and procedures to limit the administrative burden of our grant programs.A joint grant cycle kick-off meeting was held for current subrecipients and other local non-profit agencies to introduce our CDBG and HOME program application processes. At this joint kick-off meeting, the new Consortium-wide CDBG application was introduced. The Consortium revised its quarterly report form to make it easier for our subrecipients to complete.The Consortium worked together to identify programs funded by more than one Consortium member that should be monitored and agreed on which jurisdiction would take the lead on the monitoring. The resulting monitoring reports were shared with the other jurisdictions. We also held a joint mandatory subrecipient meeting to introduce CDBG staff and orient the subrecipients on the requirements of our programs. During FY 2003/04 the County began efforts to develop an outcome-based performance measurement system. Contra Costa County FY 2003/04 CAPER 39 Appendix A CDBG Financial Summary Report Attachments A-1, A-2,and A-3 Attachment A-1 IDIS C04PR26 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT OFFICE OF COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT INTEGRATED DISBURSEMENT AND INFORMATION SYSTEM CDBG FINANCIAL SUMMARY FOR PROGRAM YEAR 2003 07-01-2003 TO 06-30-2004 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CONSORTIUM, CA PART I: SUMMARY OF CDBG RESOURCES 01 UNEXPENDED CDBG FUNDS AT END OF PREVIOUS PROGRAM YEAR 4,567,712.64 02 ENTITLEMENT GRANT 4,209,000.00 03 SURPLUS URBAN RENEWAL 0.00 04 SECTION 108 GUARANTEED LOAN FUNDS 0.00 05 CURRENT YEAR PROGRAM INCOME 1,951,765.22 06 RETURNS 2,978,041.90 07 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL AVAILABLE 0.00 08 TOTAL AVAILABLE (SUM, LINES 01-07) 13,706,519.76 PART II: SUMMARY OF CDBG EXPENDITURES 09 DISBURSEMENTS OTHER THAN SECTION 108 REPAYMENTS AND PLANNING/ADMINISTRATION 6,546,898.62 10 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL AMOUNT SUBJECT TO LOW/MOD BENEFIT 0.00 11 AMOUNT SUBJECT TO LOW/MOD BENEFIT (LINE 09 + LINE 10) 6,546,898.82 12 DISBURSED IN IDIS FOR PLANNING/ADMINISTRATION 677,535.53 13 DISBURSED IN IDIS FOR SECTION 108 REPAYMENTS 0.00 14 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL EXPENDITURES 0.00 15 TOTAL EXPENDITURES (SUM, LINES 11-14) 7,224,434.35 16 UNEXPENDED BALANCE (LINE 08 - LINE 15) 6,482,085.41 PART III: LOWMOD BENEFIT THIS REPORTING PERIOD 17 EXPENDED FOR LOW/MOD HOUSING IN SPECIAL AREAS 0.00 18 EXPENDED FOR LOW/MOD MULTI-UNIT HOUSING 3,059,774°18 19 DISBURSED FOR OTHER LOW/MOD ACTIVITIES 3,494,554.87 20 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL LOW/MOD CREDIT 0.00 21 TOTAL LOW/MOD CREDIT (SUM, LINES 17-20) 6,554,329.05 22 PERCENT LOW/MOD CREDIT (LINE 21/1,INE 11) 100.00% LOW/MOD BENEFIT FOR MULTI-YEAR CERTIFICATIONS 23 PROGRAM YEARS(PY) COVERED IN CERTIFICATION - PY 2003/04 24 CUMULATIVE NET EXPENDITURES SUBJECT TO LOW/MOD BENEFIT CALCULATION 0.00 25 CUMULATIVE EXPENDITURES BENEFITING LOW/MOD PERSONS 0.00 26 PERCENT BENEFIT TO LOW/MOD PERSONS (LINE 25/LINE 24) 0.00% PART IV: PUBLIC SERVICE (PS) CAP CALCULATIONS 27 DISBURSED IN IDIS FOR PUBLIC SERVICES 734,484.80 28 PS UNLIQUIDATED OBLIGATIONS AT END OF CURRENT PROGRAM YEAR 0.00 29 PS UNLIQUIDATED OBLIGATIONS AT END OF PREVIOUS PROGRAM YEAR 0.00 30 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL PS OBLIGATIONS 0.00 31 TOTAL PS OBLIGATIONS (LINE 27 + LINE 28 - LINE 29 + LINE 30) 734,484.80 32 ENTITLEMENT GRANT 4,209,000.00 33 PRIOR YEAR PROGRAM INCOME 1,499,097.26 34 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL SUBJECT TO PS CAP 0.00 35 TOTAL SUBJECT TC PS CAP (SUM, LINES 32-34) 5,708,097.26 36 PERCENT FUNDS OBLIGATED FOR PS ACTIVITIES (LIME 31/LINE 35) 12.87% PART V: PLANNING AND ADMINISTRATION (PA) CAP 37 DISBURSED IN IDIS FOR PLANNING/ADMINISTRATION 677,535.53 38 PA UNLIQUIDATED OBLIGATIONS AT END OF CURRENT PROGRAM YEAR 0 00 39 PA UNLIQUIDATED OBLIGATIONS AT END OF PREVIOUS PROGRAM YEAR 956.34 40 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL PA OBLIGATIONS 0.00 41 TOTAL PA OBLIGATIONS (LINE 37 + LINE 38 - LINE 39 +LINE 40) 676,579.19 42 ENTITLEMENT GRANT 4,209,000.00 43 CURRENT YEAR PROGRAM INCOME 1,951,765.22 44 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL SUBJECT TO PA CAP 0.00 45 TOTAL SUBJECT TO PA CAP (SUM, LINES 42-44) 6,160,765.22 46 PERCENT FUNDS OBLIGATED FOR PA ACTIVITIES (LINE 41/LINE 45) 10.98% Contra Costa County FY 2003/04 CAPER 40 ............................................ Attachment A.2 CDBG Financial Summary Contra Costa County Community Development Department Community Development Block Grant(CDBG) Program Year 2003/2004 Reconciliation of Line of Credit(LOC) and Revolving Loam Cash Balances to Balance of CDBG Funds Shown on the Financial Summary(Part ll, Line#16) Unexpended Balance on Financial Summary $6,482,085.41 ADD: LOC Balance(HUD Grants and Program Income Report of ) $5,182,457.38 Cash On-Hand: Revolving Fund Cash Balances (HUD Grants& Program Income Report of ) $1,299,628.03 Total Reconciling Balance $6.482,085.41 Unreconciled Difference $0.00 Contra Costa County FY 2003/44 CAPER 41 Attachment A.3 CDBG Financial Summary Contra Costa County Community Development Department Community Development Block Grant Program Year 2003/2004 Program/Revolving Loan Income Realized (PURL) Grantee Funds: Income CA Autism Foundation (A Better Chance IX) $6,352.64 Pinole Grove residual receipts $1,055.24 Grayson Creek residual receipts $15,461.00 Rodriquez loan repayment $12,135.00 Gray loan repayment $46,326.75 Wall loan repayment $26,589.75 Hernandez loan repayment $29,000.00 McNeley loan repayment $3,000.00 Boys and Girls Club $25,000.00 Total Grantee Program Income (PI) $164,920.38 Revolving Loan Funds: County Community Development Dept. Microenterprise Loan Program $38,719.51 County Community Development Dept. Small Business Loan Program $41,973.09 County Building Inspection Dept. Neighborhood Preservation Program $959,664.74 City of San Pablo Rehab and Neighborhood Preservation Program $625,908.61 Contra Costa County Housing Authority Rental Rehab Program $120,578.89 Total Revolving Loan Income (RL) $1,786,844.84 Float Loan Repayment: Grayson Creek $2,978,041.90 Grand Total $4,929,807.12 Contra Costa County FY 2003/04 CAPER 42 Appendix B -- ESG Financial Summary Contra Costa County Community Development Department Emergency Shelter Grants Program Program Year 2003/2004 Unexpended Committed Balance at Unexpended Funds FY FY Balance at FY Project HUD 2003/2004 2002/2003 Expenditures 2003/2004 Number Subrecipient Activity Action Plan Year End FY 2003/2004 Year End ESG-02-01 CC Crisis 695 $1,867.00 $1,857.00 $0.00 ESC-0202 Shelter Inc. 696 $2,753.93 $2,758.93 $0.00 ESG-02-03 STAND 697 $5,041.68 $5,041.68 $0.00 ESG-02-04 Health Services 698 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $0.00 ESG-02-05 GRIP 699 $12,100.00 $12,100.00 $0.00 ESG-03-01 CC Crisis 781 $5,000.00 $3,333.00 $1,667.00 ESG-03-02 Shelter Inc. 782 $12,300.00 $7,065.57 $5,234.43 ESG-03-03 STAND 783 $20,000.00 $13,603.86 $6,396.14 ESG-03-04 Health Services 784 $90,000.00 $60,000.00 $30,000.00 Total Projects $127,300.00 $51,567.61 $135,570.04 $43,297.57 Admin FY 2003/2004 Allocation 785 $6,700.00 $6,730.00 ($30.00) Total Admin $6,700.00 $6,730.00 ($30.00) Grand Total (admin/projects) $134,000.00 $51,567.61 $142,300.04 $43,267.57 Contra Costa County FY 2003/04 CAPER 43 Appendix C — Additional Contra Costa Consortium and Urban County HOME Program Information This appendix contains the following information and attachments: • Attachment C-1 Annual Performance Report—HOME Program (HUD-44107, Part I-V) (Program Income, MBE/WBE Participation, and Relocation) • Attachment C-2 HOME Match Report(HUD-40107-A) Attachment C-1 and C-2 Nates HOME Program (HUD40107, Part III) This table includes information for the following Consortium projects completed during Fri'2003104. Victoria Apartments and Herb White Way. HOME Program(HUD-40107, Part Y) See Section III.E Displacement Narrative. HOME Match Report (HUD-44107-A) Based on guidance provided in HUD Information Bulletin CPD-98-29, the Urban County and Consortium reports cover the County's program year(July through June)rather than the federal fiscal year(October through September). Contra Costa County FY 2003/04 CAPER 44 Annual Performance Report U.B. Department of Housing OMS Approval No.2506-0171 and Urban Development (exp. 11/30/2001) HOME Program Office of Community Planning and Development Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 2.5 hours per response,including the time for reviewing instructions,searching existing data sources,gathering and maintaining the data needed,and completing and reviewing the collection of information. This agency may not conduct or sponsor,and a person isnot required to respond to,a doliection of information unless that collection displays a valid OMB control number. The HOME statute imposes a significant number of data collection and reporting requirements. This includes information on assisted properties,on the owners or tenants of the properties,and on other programmatic areas. The information will be used: 1)to assist HOME participants in managing their programs;2)to track performance of participants in meeting fund commitment and expenditure deadlines;3)to permit HUD to determine whether each participant meats the HOME statutory income targeting and affordability requirements;and 4)to permit HUD to determine compliance with other statutory and regulatory program requirements. This data collection is authorized under Title 11 of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Actor related authorities. Access to Federal grant funds is contingent on the reporting of certain project-specific data elements. Records of information collected will be maintained by the recipients of the assistance. Information on activities and expenditures of grant funds is public information and Is generally available for disclosure. Recipients are responsible for ensuring confidentiality when public disclosure is not required. This form is intended to collect numeric data to be aggregated nationally as a complement to data collected through the Cash and Management Information (C/Ml)System. Participants should enter the reporting period in the first block.The reporting period is October 1 to September 30. Instructions are included for each section if further explanation is needed. Submit this form on or before December 31. This report is for period(mm/ddiyyvy) Date Submitted tmm/ddryyyy) Send one copy to the appropriate HUD Field Office and one copy to: Starting Ending HOME Program,Rm 7176,451 7th Street,S.W.,Washington D.C.2041f 7/1/03 6/30/04 9/28/04 Part I Participant Identification 1. Participant Number 2. Participant Name DC060231 Contra Costa Consortium 3. Name of Person completing this report 4. Phone Number(include Area Code) Kristen Alcaraz 925/335-1258 5. Address 6. City 7. State ;8. zip Code 851 Pine Street,5th Floor-North Wing Martinez CA 94553 Part If Program Income Enter the following program income amounts for the reporting period: in block 1,enter the balance on hand at the beginning;in block 2,enter the amount generated;in block 3,enter the amount expended;and in block 4, enter the amount for Tenant-Based rental Assistance. 1. Balance on hand at Beginning i 2. Amount received during 3. Total amount expended 4. Amount expended for Tenant-I 5. Batance on hand at end of of Reporting Period Reporting Period during Reporting Period Based Rental Assistance Reporting Period(1+2-3)-5 $0 $632,235 $632,235 $0 $0 Part III Minority Business Enterprises(MBE)and Women Business Enterprises(WBE) In the table below;indicate the number and dollar value of contracts for HOME projects completed during the reporting period. Minority Business Enterprises(MBE) a. Total b. Alaskan Nativeor c. Asian or d. Black e. Hispanic f. White American Indian Pacific Islander Non-Hispanic Non-Hispanic A. Contracts 1. Number 21 0 1 0 2 18 2. Dollar Amount $17,672,667 $0 $72,128 $0 $18,100 $17,582,439 S. Sub-Contracts 1, Number 31 0 0 2 1 j 28 I 2. Dollar Amount $11,645,485 $0 $0 $401,892 $9,5517 $11,234,043 a. Total b. Women Business c. Male Enterprises(WBE) C. Contracts 1. Number 21 3 18 2. Dollar Amount $17,672,667 $66,266 $17,606,401 t D. Sub-Contracts 1. Number 31 1 30 2. Dollar Amounts $11,645,485 $10,225 $11,635,260 i page 1 of 2 form HUD-40107(11192) Dart IV Minority Owners of Rental Property In the table below,indicate the number of HOME assisted rental property owners and the total dollar amount of HOME funds in these rental properties assisted during the reporting period. Minority Property Owners ! a. Total b. Alaskan Native or c. Asian or i d. Black e, Hispanic f. White American Indian Pacific Islander Nor,-Hispanic Non-Hispanic 1. Number 0 2. Dollar Amount p Part V (relocation and Real Property Acquisition Indicate the number of persons displaced,the cost of revocation payments,the number of parcels acquired,and the cost of acquisition. The data provided should reflect only displacements and acquisitions occurring during the reporting period. a. Number b. Cost 1. Parcels Acquired 0 2. Businesses Displaced 0 3. Nonprofit Organizations Displaced 0 4. Households Temporarily Relocated,not Displaced 0 Minority Business Enterprises(MBE) Households Displaced a. Total h. Alaskan Native or c. Asian or d. Black j e. Hispanic f. White American Indian Pacific Islander Non-Hispanic Non-Hispanic 5. Households Displaced-Number 0 6. Households Displaced-Cost 0 page 2 of 2 form HUD-40107(11192) ........................................... Annual Performance Report U.S. Department of Housing OMB Approval No.2506-0171 and Urban Development (exp:1113012401) HOME Program Office of Community Planning and Development Public reporting burden for this collection of information Is estimated to average 2.5 hours per response,Including the time for reviewing instructions,searching existing data sources,gathering and maintaining the data needed,and completing and reviewing the collection of information. This agency may not conduct or sponsor,and a person is not required to respond to,a collection of information unless that collection displays a valid OMB control number. The HOME statute imposes a significant number of data collection and reporting requirements. This includes information on assisted properties,on the owners or tenants of the properties,and on other programmatic areas. The information will be used: 1)to assist HOME participants in managing their programs;2)to track performance of participants in meeting fund commitment and expenditure deadlines; 3)to permit HUD to determine whether each participant meets the HOME statutory Income targeting and affordability requirements;and 4)to permit HUD to determine compliance with other statutory and regulatory program requirements. This data collection is authorized under Title 11 of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Actor related authorities. Access to Federal grant funds is contingent on the reporting of certain project-specific data elements, Records of information collected will be maintained by the recipients of the assistance. Information on activities and expenditures of grant funds is public information and is generally available for disclosure. Recipients are responsible for ensuring confidentiality when public disclosure is not required. This form is intended to collect numeric data to be aggregated nationally as a complement to data collected through the Cash and Management information (CIMI)System. Participants should enter the reporting period in the first block. The reporting period is October 1 to September 30. Instructions are included for each section If further explanation is needed. Submit this form on or before December 31. This report is for period(mm/ddlyyyy) Date Submitted(mmrddryyyy) Send one copy to the appropriate HUD Field Office and one copy to. Starting Ending HOME Program,Elm 7176,451 7th Street,S.W.,Washington D.C.2041 7/1/03 6/30/04 9/28/04 Part I Participant Identification 1. participant Number (2. Participant Name UC60203 Contra Costa Urban County 3. Name of Person completing this report 4. Phone Number(Include Area Code) Kristen,Alcaraz 525/335-1258 5. Address 8. City 7. State 8. Zip Code 651 Pine Street,5th Floor-North Wing Martinez CA 94553 Part It Program Income Enter the following program income amounts for the reporting period: in block 1,enter the balance on hand at the beginning;in block 2,enter the amount generated;in block 3,enter the amount expended;and in block 4,enter the amount for Tenant-Based rental Assistance. 1. Balance on hand at Beginning 2. Amount received during 3. Total amount expended 4. Amount expended for Tenant- 5. Balance on hand st end of of Reporting Period Reporting Period during Reporting period Based Rental Assistance Reporting Period(1+2-3)=5 $0 $85,368 $85,368 $0 $0 Fart III Minority Business Enterprises(MBE)and Women Business Enterprises(WBE) In the table below,indicate the number and dollar value of contracts for HOME projects completed during the reporting period. Minority Business€nterprises(MBE) a. Total i b. Alaskan Native or c. Asian or d. Black e. Hispanic f. White American Indian Pacific Islander Non-Hispanic Non-Hispanic A. Contracts 1. Number 0 2. Dollar Amount 0 B. Sub-Contracts 1. Number 0 2. Dollar Amount 0 I a. Total b. Women Business c. Male En:erprises(WB€) C. Contracts 1. Number 0 2. Dollar Amount 0 D. Sub-Contracts 0 1. Number 2. Dollar Amounts 0 page 1 of 2 form HUD-40107(11192) Part IV Minority Owners of Rental Property In the table below,indicate the number of HOME assisted rental property owners and the total dollar amount of HOME funds in these rental properties assisted during the reporting period. Minority Property Owners a. Total b. Alaskan Native or c. Asian or d. Black e. Hispanic f. White American indian Pacific Islander Non-Hispanic Non-Hispanic i 1. Number 0 I 2. Dollar Amount f 0 , Part V Relocation and Real Property Acquisition Indicate the number of persons displaced,the cost of relocation payments,the number of parcels acquired,and the cost of acquisition. The data provided should reflect only displacements and acquisitions occurring during the reporting period. i a. Number b. Cost 1. Parcels Acquired 0 2. Businesses Displaced 0 3. Nonprofit Organizations Displaced 0 4. Households Temporarily Relocated,not Displaced 0 _ Minority Business Enterprises(MBE) Households Displaced a. Total b. Alaskan Native or c. Asian or d. Black 9. Hispanic I. white American Indian Pacific Islander Non-Hispanic Non-Hispanic b. Households Displaced-Number 0 t 6. Households Displaced-Cost 0 page 2 of 2 form HUD-40107(11192) ico co cL, 05 fd clic s ' a to 0 r tn cli C'4CL w f e c» € 06 Z d U (f � �• a � COj c ttY1 CM ll ID zc- i� tcs to In co rn i o � ° Q a E cC c t3 i z U m 2 e f n� � I U � f i m CCL 0 O i S 2 E zX 06 �0 e > w c2 .SQ c ' ro o � c a� r> SCS.. co co t15 � t6� �o N C ! �- LLca si i LL tz E ` " � m � I toss� a Cf) tm nes m �- @ 0. U c eo D as ea �s M CD Co C. m a d w (Do u. LL so m U� in U. u o c tm Li c 6I N fU. y,. CL cn 0 b ECL 2 to nj C.S •` le M CL .. Mq its L E O w E N > w c CC m Z W li s od IL < c ii, r ev ri .r ori CL T us cc C1 Cl Appendix D -- Affirmative Marketing Procedures The objective of affirmative marketing within the context of the HOME,CDBG,HOPWA,and ESG Programs is to promote equal access to housing by all groups within the relevant market area. In order to accomplish this objective in accordance with federal regulations the County has adopted the following policies and measures: 1. Methods for informing the public, owners, and potential tenants about the HOME. CDBG, HOPWA,and ESG Programs,federal fair housing laws and the County's affrrmativ_e marl€etng op licY. Information concerning the availability of funding, housing opportunities, and fair housing and affirmative marketing requirements will be distributed to: the general public; all jurisdictions and housing agencies located in the County; nonprofit and for-profit owners and developers of affordable housing; and minority and public interest groups representing the County's disadvantaged populations. Methods of distribution will include: a. Press releases to the local news media. b. Preparation and distribution of an informational brochure describing the HOME,CDBG, HOPWA, and ESG Programs, including fair housing and affirmative marketing requirements, and the Equal Housing Opportunity logo. C. Meetings and workshops with potential applicants for HOME funds (e.g., cities, developers, current operators and owners of affordable housing). d. Meetings and workshops with representatives of minority and other disadvantaged groups in Contra Costa County, including the NAACP, United Council of Spanish Speaking Organizations, Pacific Community Services, Contra Costa Legal Services Foundation, North Richmond Neighborhood House, Housing Alliance, and the Chinese American Political Association. e. The County will maintain records concerning the above activities, including copies of press releases,affirmative marketing materials distributed,and workshops and meetings held with the above groups and organizations. 2. Requirements and practices owners of assisted housing must adhere to in order to carry out the County's affirmative marketing procedures and requirements. The County will require owners of federally assisted housing to comply with federal fair housing law and employ the following affirmative marketing activities: Contra Costa County FY 2003/04 CAPER 45 a. Advertise the availability of assisted units on an equal opportunity basis in local newspapers and community newsletters, such as those published by minority groups, neighborhood churches, public service organizations, etc.; and on bulletin boards in community gathering spots(e.g.,community center,church,supermarket,laundromat,fair housing/housing counseling agency, and employment office). b. Contact appropriate neighborhood and community.organizations and representatives of minority and other disadvantaged groups to solicit tenants and provide information about the availability of the assisted units on an equal opportunity basis. c. Display the Equal. Housing Opportunity logo at the project location and in all advertisements pertaining to assisted units. I Special outreach procedures to be used by owners of assisted units to solicit applications from hard-to-reach populations who may not otherwise apply-for residence in these units. a. In conducting the advertising and outreach activities described in 2.a and b above,owners of assisted units will be required to solicit the cooperation of appropriate organizations in the relevant market area in identifying hard-to-reach populations and informing prospective tenants from these groups of the availability of the units on an equal opportunity basis. Organizations which may be particularly effective in this effort include community churches, social service organizations, housing and homeless service providers, and minority and senior citizen groups. As appropriate, owners may request organizations to assist in distributing marketing information concerning the availability of rental units through newsletters, group meetings, and organization and community bulletin boards. b. Again,all advertisements,workshops,meetings and notices concerning the assisted-units will emphasize that the units are available on an equal opportunity basis. 4. Record keeping requirements. The County will require recipients of federal funds to keep records concerning affirmative marketing activities. These records must include copies of advertisements placed in newspapers/newsletters and on local bulletin boards,as well as lists of community groups and organizations contacted to solicit tenants. Recipients will also be required to keep information on relevant tenant characteristics, including ethnic composition, income,household size, and age and sec of head of household. 5. Assessment of affirmative marketinsz activities. The County will require the information compiled in 4 above to be reported annually as a component of the project monitoring process. Affirmative marketing activities will be evaluated to ensure that an adequate level of activity is maintained. Tenant characteristics will be compared with population characteristics in the market area as a further indicator of the effectiveness of the affirmative marketing program and the absence of discrimination. Where discrepancies exist,the County will work with the project owner to determine whether additional affirmative marketing measures are required. Contra Costa County FY 2003/04 CAPER 46 Requirements concerning affirmative marketing and fair housing compliance will be incorporated in contract and loan agreements for all assisted projects. The County will document any complaints received concerning a project recipient's failure to abide by all fair housing and equal opportunity laws. All such complaints will be carefully evaluated to determine their validity. In the event that a violation is identified,the County will inform the recipient and take appropriate action to ensure that the situation is corrected. Contra Costa County FY 2003/04 CAPER 47 Appendix E — Completed and Ongoing Projects by Fending Category Contra Costa County FY 2003104 CAPES 48 _ I d b co 0 C+ LO co�+3 � 2L u ¢ a E v o EST ui z m c c m m y N — d T Ct � 42 LU m N � m al F 3 Z N p > y N U O0 -- -- ----- -- W = .� a � H U U. u e 0LLT u � m � o _ m r �' � 1 t2•a � m tai U -� it a� m � r �s E cu EL Gt G 3 O N .? y us ro U 0rm- •� Q 0 C c LS. E GS N — O y -s IS 3 a C O m w A m C w riVU m 24 ;Cw� IM.Ym0 y O y-. jto UavmO a . nO 4 a. . E d E =0 CL CCC E y m Ln L C LS _C r Cmc#oo E� OL 00 mm y �l�p� : a+s pm Off , C20 < N O (JCc < zp � » C3 °.' � m H � i O m C E ;m c ZE m or U m i3 C� b E O E V .43W �s a d e. E 0 c� c ' c OI= a� cn CL E to rs o -- — ---- — 21 cs si— •ar O =LLI y c _ -- -- — -- 43 o U5 Z CL w 6 c v O c ro C) W �E n IL E rz w t2 ti � � o Z a NF -Cl C5 v >U- 64 t}r N 0 M W �!" ca o or- m P C iAC N d 00 'ff t O U y: N �/N}} . UZLc1- gin § Ac+ Aa, 5 EM-0. c �CO raE, c 0. + 0'- m o o 2 2 '20 E42) Im CC) C3 E , 00c� en � cs 4) 16 1.. 011 W 3 CLQ G :3O [L ME C t15 C ) g 9M E y U CC C (n X17 d E-7 Cr co C) rd m fS N E 0 E p � Cs. n MCL cm r `�' _0 d u. E-o-_�c -- -- J- — w — 0 a. 6 p i so Ci G C? rts �, � • v � � � ca 0a05 rk t. , ` � 0c o yea � �-- w dl N la- L) 00 5p� m 0 16 n` o OD 0 LO rs 8 J `4 [S I ty7 L m cb Mn y CL E An ci ly7 m < CL � � _ zea r 4, — --- c m c c ay m _2 y d d z ce ri. E Q �yyyL CLN c. CZ id 4f LL Ca 0 y cv h y m to _ 0 C CO u LU a '� ° z p CD CL 70 -- a —'--- LL .0 0t rs rt, m y N -�y e '*' ..: N h Cl CC �Cy 0 0 m d m E ?^� rT m m cC il., e m p (,7 i11 y Uj +m' tg C ca m C m Lm O N tf O t�S -0 m m a m Cl'�CS � CJcr3 © �' nm 3> m � camo � = sm p3 t m c of wU >_� E cLL0U_ z ch- d m a a Somyoc ¢ moemY3 � U > I a o iL cn E i S G� ui E c`t.e EL cca --- ------ c — —- --- -- L (m7 C (D � c � a o iii. a) m C C m U M E u um E E c 6 S d 0 Z •E pp G7 t o U t7 C7 as o to i o—� Ef 0 ZLL0- Z � o rt 61 0 LV a. ro d r co ) CS � co b � C+3 terry r r C tr7 S2 O N h,�N C .m. CL m _ x - - --- m _ L w O C7 O c o m cif _c c� o 0 < f to ce so f; -i- - - - e ;Fc ZIM E com e C�3 y 8 C91et LO SIN co CL Z $ !J p o r• c+i u ul p V 72 CqCL 0 0 CO W Lal C �! o u LL Z tJ to c N to 43 E CL @ E y c? t3 U A 0 o 0 E c LO +•� +ty tS C: rR U C1' CS, a 7 C r N = C r. m y a C. m N --- fll ¢ +O •nC :?`` Qy g�g 1� •1 I 12 17 tss CD 1't CL tJ C tL ti i CL U E i7 t7 E �m oo = 4> om a mcm ohm • m .v_� civi 3 _ �K o� _v G�3 t7 CL U F- - > C}. CC I"' U p 0• t- U C C Gb y th N OdME C OS tj7 m m m C U o QC 0 C7 m 0 (7 LO E "J C j O 'm d ftl 0 ! ppE p�p 117 I t�t�� 20 N CS Coo 4[S C3 tJ ?CJ CJ USU �' � CR, v (s p C.L•�; C.> m muj EU ` ru 2 � c`tsani -2 E AS L cc a aa- USuj � dtL � 4). uB`. ! c r r ae -80 c co a o 0 `' N o o !c� co a a cm r' C c)IN rri — cu -° Lot 1° S + > ti �S tot -t y '� u, . a Z S CL cv - --- -- - -- z3: 2D co CL .9 CE> �d o7 ,04CO o . � .S m C5 W m LL. te) C (!) 0 � � GS � N c'? 0 13 v C � C3 LL. ato --- - --- - --- C Ci) dt ad 4)f CL CL CL CL CL 9 #b O > t1 EtS U U — C3� � _ o y t_�, 440) 2 _ _�Sx tJ3 a IOD T 12 ca aw) E Co Q as oar •� a �- o 0 4&s c d o E a E ° ° ° o f ° 0. y 85 tU � � m E C G ° � 'y C) 0 0 8 o N � � 0 m 2 oCL , C 43 tl cE° c 0C O 2: � [i E Ct c . 2 - � g CL cc C7 t=3 C ;FM N FL co d N C%Jo M o U gy y E s C6CL 8 CL m C a cU I' u1 N j. u7 7 rrz �3o .�tCJ � �= LO `"`L,,y 00.. tt) �y � LGs lo — --- - -- {-`---_--- -.. 1-0 !Sy7 i € C a U} Q ti O 41 P '2 LL 8 -0 cd 0in w LU � U tat � •D .o N CV N N C' C G O 0 Y 1 16 d E O m O itl m � s � 0 . c m a y --- CD E A LU CL CL RZCL v C 42c LL# R o CLd ua m m CM COci m U 0 f � acs � e rzco G n us p > cc cru Q{�i �s "{ N p, N N 0 to CO o ca r= 0 LL M —----- — 7 C or- co � — c mc •m9 " - 0) m mZOEeN > a 0C CL t7 m m � 'ayrnamt � rnr � � k Ci CL c a Ern c sy`ycQ c Ci > a a c5 a ticJ v o - r t+ c� m --- �'—a s7 w s� CL a a C a o I'- 0 c rn. ' m tO C ° m 't-- CO � C p ad �s E `� 'm° 9 m n � at°0 � m 0 N tty U :a tq m cm m U Ul (D CU � C Y c ° `2 -Z .9 U '� � p: y� U C O e m gym+ +, gm CJ 22 Vj �F CI ca c ° CL c y in -0 � vQ� m a m a Cv5 ° j �y C O asE y U C> ° flJ m m C C Cl CLCL N 'C ym C C V 3 N cD mLn In m c LO a i (!1 c CL CA � co o d] tv om � co CD E � c3 IU 5 CL UL tm iU j T u� E a c 2 � Ln it3 > u; z m !U mu> mm y Z �° ro d e C d in CL mC7 mo.E _Yv7cc N N N a c CL CO CCD O C3 a - cs r- ZF i � t N W ` t`n S C aL co o OR � N to :+ CA 0 ty o .tt m � Co- 46 0 0 o _ E ° U en u C m E fp 95 ff E 2 a9 F- G5 co YY M Ce) ham^ LL W Cj U. Ntf7 Cq 0 CDCL (fl UU —. •G �j CA t{ 6 C aor- 78 N ® °C7 •`�+,.C�, -moi to EL CD IONa g3 r C s gid _ rn'per l 8 cY, as {u� f// - 0 � (°� 8 (f C cSy g� Y �,1 EU if W 0 EE m-6 E ul �- tp rLD n e y 6 ry U IS pQ a f N 175 ptyjh U U 4 rC F N 2.CV d N U C c1 wU.. ou�5 Tv �1 U d5 b Or o tE'� E fo mi m� e' 2y� M c .� U- N= F- C — U ti C5 CD m Q E � � m � r � F- � a E CD o royE-8 E1 2rj: ro cEI& . E CL a U r } O O B N L U.0 jq CS C C O U y p•d5 .0 (D 0 e U o c5 E w o u5 r uSEE � u5 ; c t VvE CS {) c1. C,. Cty E ci CpL 0>5w a`5= !a•- ,'5 o C)a5 .'.. O •.L„-' N111 t!5 ;N fc .� CL a U N m C 517 tf X 15 U O 'i7 m O tp A L'3. O �«.Cl O C t!i•� O `O CI .._. f C C a E � NaRt v - �� c c E Ely - 2 w a� cep E PL C'' �. °o»_ �u te 0 0 2L m �3t U L m h E tf5 F- 65 m E zi a5 a U F- CL m U c F a5 t7 i 5IT N C) _ W CJ in .0 • ;N to I� j (�} �y., C7115O X185 U QwCTI � p C v am US ��rrrx oc � b En Qo aExa tarla�i rCi �t � �mU� a jh ct5 ec°i a E! ir IZ A. to�• LS kil'.t'. U UJ U3 IS 0 i —-- .5Lm} oN5 .°6 C C .0 d U y m b 0 G t5 2! cc :a. Er m � ao r 3 °a L' N CrS •Ui T LO d ' Lu! ma � Li m'o � cg, urs n,a .�• ams $ E ass ai �''� jrZ;irT It M ti<C'h Jc) cv QcnL3cc oa iaC5C7 mwlu a 0 a l a.a 13LL a.. a F M N N Z°bV N N CC�S t7.i I co ¢0- U 6 N Is d I m m . E z - — — -- Y I fII _ 43 f } to CL x N w LL 6 � cma m ur U 25 _ `° zs ui c {{yy o H m c b cv :2, Yt b 6 C � Ca L b y@ g N .� CS N m ' cusE `��± Uc �[ ? o,y � nrcCm y. 12 -6 C N rp g SIJ_"�� 43 N m � 20 m & O EC� ti m .«, 5� t� "' •e a' S CRI o •o .n m sae l a. - = m e E, j N m y 21�'cL, m O a roC7 m m m 3 E -,0 m c15 o U o. V � Nu E m m . c i a 4 ._ 2 -0 U 2 i gg o.m .9 E CL (021 2 g 6 m N O t) N io Q LY C 2 _ 0 �M � E � m'C9 t41 C5 tJ A a cry c1vY� �' � m p $� 2 ¢ �� E E'v,� 'c a E � m m M �r mo 8 - smc - Eo >– c _ �y t� °off -:5A .r� CL 43m try Q1� �g; !Z c -r- N C t) I��•; p�' t7'� C Ugyl- vm d � cacm�a. � m m .� w 81�c� � tSl� o .� £ a ao� 3cum cm» � E rL 15 E do N y'� cm - � Ny v N � KSr C iE a 2 E E r c c c m a E a a »m i- C N to uJ ! U S ca tS�lC) C _ or- as - a tai CIS s_5 bN ° i1 m > o i ° m m 2 = m ' (j rn « a w mu a m a C `r G ' C c'b m e a m d m m = E N D +� ` C].N 21 tl Cy +. 6 6 "7 C C7 ' ma c ee r smear I m EaNi 9 p d � a�maesdy b m . 6 O o—��• 6 Gt �0 to i U .G yC � m � ' 2'icod Cmc i CSE ` is CC S 0 �Caa_3 tcy/� `L Clio tl K. 0 > aurin r ar �- mrsacmcco i =,` aEbm �i -2: xax m0Eo 6NC7� 6Ntf o om a 10 E E IL n1 6 m m ocJ m o a -d m m o " c m €p 9 C. C E U Via- CNS `� 'C ttl �y ttl �6 .8 'L m a _ m b c m w O N {�" C b.°a.,- . 9 b' CS. � G>M N En 14 C-- w N�tNj1 -` C �- U l6 Cl H E F e f- .Z i6 Z m 6 F-ID iri a r? N s 19 C e Ch V I 171 v � tC�A � £ b � m b N m CL E rit0 U. _Caoi� tD mZ3_CQQ'3 C1 _. c - a i .m' ri . dc .LE if Ut�- ' �aLEE C, <1Co = N o <N N � Z Nn Cl ) 0U --- _- Q Z iS M if �S e v B m ` um a nci ! N c a e .0 c �� c � �' E- c y t�t�1 m em 0 J9 d > N yN d ti $, YrmS [C fly o -- b m > E Ea c i> &6 � E1No � EmE,is �ae � L m m � 13 > am ,d a.ca 3 mm rn &1brz r�u_ `t�� �r,�rn > � j�rn m — � cy a. t-- �cc cn_C14 C11 ����, Z �_c�_� _-- LL LL LL Ch t 0 a ro � Fi U C7 N S s N N p F d C\cj 6 N N to w M La utLn ; 0 � t, wil VC N Ph T) CL .� � fU N 4) H Cl N C d N IND, � C G5 � m C d � 2 MJF- C 3 F mc!> CF ;iv CJ c 0 C s CD y � G N C C d C} E d'V a N 9 N F C N k ¢ � _ F U a 10 0 i1 di �y Q O UCty7 �ssss��?fft ® (� sn `o cit pp c m >,150 �q4 CL b U 'U_ O n C]` ¢• ul�' Y S a a o 0 0 �r 7i S 1L � cv p mi.- V O a N p C dl! t�J�� � u5 1•- M O � � I � fpr LL�'S di a OJ � y6 �Yypy, �yry�ui HH}(� .6, `•1 C�1t'j Flo C'MX 1 OY I d iA y Lu CL cL 25 u I � 3 m "so is Ll LL a � � cca. � cc r � y¢�35 a i a � 1 c $ py � tl S I M �- d t`• �i77ii WWW yy�� ��yy N 'C9 N I c i CG U ' g 5 tttSSS�iii v ..555RR3 � d ,� � @ O� �y _(• Y � 49 � N � wCL y F= U�¢ 6 iL QI 6q I V3 }' M M YW H �°, toLL s o a d m N y fin en is w as us 0 v � CL m a a 3cli 3cr w a o e ° 0 329 g a � � � CL al`8 �i dSQ a r�CS � Is@e �'• � 3, a i �y��4"1 ICS¢"' � C "''�^ K � 'eC rYa„ 12 to ZIA C _ d�.� ��� i9 �' d � ! c •tr. � �dh dN d a c� a yy;; rJ N �,U t+� 5•U i E' �' t5 c fir 0, ve r a 42 � 0 a � � co cam,. � � 0 c. p�y Id g L O O C7 O S co O 2 S u lift • o d n b a r L O O r O CL W CL ( i u s � f I ca m V ul _ U ff. to s w pvw ai cr m a I a a I L1 FCJ � 61 U C) 47 C N LA z o 9R4..I l £A . N T2 la a a a v M a N N ca cc CL CL y a � N O O O 6i N C}. m d •~- TWi II. {u IR IfH (Vl N !9 N M i 4 aC � i © C U � 1-619 I Al a IF C—d -_� M T usn � U „ w Ji co gn I o R o O M O Cf ' "'444JJJy CD � i x ca ca t a C — o $ o o p a n LU ttpp ^j 4 O N tL ( �AI IL •8 � B � L��� o.�� ay ap ` 's N �+ I I O V5 e m c a C C id C O ; 0 CO asED ca til W � C p p O wO R) � � � cu RS co 's •c w ami ami m s Z rn a m cu r cc ttl r �s I'D m � m c cu m ca C C C td a co cis co U1 � g b mi 0, m 2 2 02 m I Ci o f1 N CL CS. 0) y y t/7 . N �s w CL CILm i gCL m 0a — �' tL � Yi U a a a` .a a Cl $ HIM A's A2 CL M CL $ � E Lai s a a a a a a c e t � � 5 IA- kill J � � N Cl. a m ' � TJ td ep N � N N m At � � E z V3:0 - � - _- �, m g 1 g 1 � g p 991 a } S o a a as 13 s a Aa cn j CA { .t — -- - i ----------- � z ti r� 9 1 � s ti Ci tv � t xw ae.f � a w tj I z cl 21 I m Li hffl I:r U y: y Ott U7 tl5� j � � e4�Upyg Fg Q af{ � ayy_ q o U 6 � x 6 s o c`4i a i 4 x QC I N 6 � N C 7t3i 1 ate— -- U. at a- .,T Oz a all 92 .fig e � g� � $ . }s L$m N yC t iW - Q CL EL - - j - LU r L c o a ui m $ � LT d L� H4 IN O.m OS O .S a?$r u2 S Seasif Idf S i 2i Q u N G tW N az a cc c� 0 LL C d 02 c � N LU — — -- - �# r � _t C9 hmW _ v to g'n e Id .if r jig ID lcm w g ——CLto — 0 R TT- Z-oo. C R tE wto Awl dt N N Q 04 LO aGo r � co C � ;� a = (D0LLel 0 44 44V c L CL C14 a tt 0 FL0 0). 61� 40 C\l UJ ui rn js CL V 14 c `" a •R ass �, CL d to N e� p �}: • N y y �j G•= ..y �Vi ca tf e�: Gia �tls5 ` ry 6 �Ny Y1 N tU H .� y `F 0 w C O t73 �+ to �++ � c $ o m :scs .: � s�r au s2 � ocvZ' �o3 O `9 {/TLM a. .= f!9 L w 9. �.,a w m N d7 Ml N N CL _ .� - �` $ i E 'er d' v �e i� `Vi o c m ' '*- G to N y3j (LS 0 � 0 8 C7 � '� 0 d .Q1+ 0 C p to m y rR 4,' th z ! .v ... O i� 'L742 z > y C �6 t11 t) SJ fp 7 12 a CL Gya$ �yat c uy c I CL 3gtt g� ,yNr ID tl� 0 rri �' ci a to m 8 R eti - ro U5 w 0 ° G t3 cD to w m m w c R U gas t� < < ' �y `t o bus ° E " , Em co co 0 0 0 0 8 cc a. r 010- co ca, � E � D w (D0 04 ry C14 CLO a a cu ILU w w v M z c � Z5 C c0 y LL G 3 $. Lrf to �y 0 3 C 0 44= 8 .> 6% o T to LL C 5 0 LP �p C7 C7 C M +ty E 6 v 49 8 CL LO ; LL r W�y. V Vk ce) LU y. � ID 40 �} co C C C ,C d tie ro .0s yyc Svc • m ui ; • v ' ui CL ca c ni vi e�7 cv 3cSi'r tiu° Uo , ' GU) C, coo v mmrmm ? y ric'om � a ia � cx 10 dem myZ Lu ECLD .. _ rs �rHoamcoa ' je x c iymcyCL 9La 0 3 C } N � r C t3 c3 a c OR c 0' 8 n c�' m o -a •a N 020TH tatoo t=a ro > a ` E � 8 E m � �' a m LO c 6 _ ° mr> 0 U 8 X0 ' °= N LL Cl) C a c W L C3 ns < U L3 a c` ti t° 0 Z E E C) c�i U $' m ma. V c C? Z 3a IL 0 Cn C? 0 ren � o a cs c 0 -------------- tL UJ UJ W u � c3 z �a d os d ti r.. 8 r Jfi 4D U-U- C6 44 440 c 0 to CL , r v aoil w U ttS NN . i7 a C A c d1 E H i3 C 04 0 � + CCL eYi'' d1 a. N 1� CCN 7L . �V to -a 2= c dLwce LM O a iS er TN 6 'pN 01 co C mC 4) CL Mi C t0 S, 5 hi E � 00 a 0 W CL L L4 0 ' CL to to CeL €3mt) u mf° z y m LIS t 6A c o x 4 �y g 0 n°°-n U-) n E b ° 0 � C ° � � Cc 2 C" m tz OL LU O