Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 09282002 - C.71 TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS 'Y Contra FROM: DENNIS M. BARRY, AICD Costa COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTORCounty DATE: SEPTEMBER 26, 2004 SUBJECT: RESCIND EXISTING LANG?CONSERVATION CONTRACT NO.3-69 AFFECTING APN: 354-310-021 AND APPROVE A NEW LAND CONSERVATION CONTRACT, LANG)CONSERVATION CONTRACT NO.04-0005,RELATING TO LAND OWNED BY THOMAS BRENKLE, LOCATED AT CUMMINGS SKYWAY AND STATE ROUTE 4, FRANKLIN CANYON AREA (SUP. GIST. II) SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATIONS ADOPT resolution rescinding the existing Land Conservation Contract No. 3-69 as to APN: 354-310-021, approving a new contract, Land Conservation Contract No.04-0005 for APN: 354-310-0121 and authorizing the Chair to execute Lancs Conservation Contract No. 04- 0005 with Thomas Brenkle, the owner of APN 354-310-021, FISCAL IMPACT None. CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: X YES SIGNATURE RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMM1 7 APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURES . ACTION OF BOARD ON £ ':r ` . 'APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED ; TI4ER VP I=OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND UNANIMOUS(ABSENT A :r"}`-�}'' CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN AND AYES: NOES: ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF ABSENT: ABSTAIN: SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN r Contact: P.Roche,CDD-AP(925)335-9242 ATTESTED cc: Community Development Dept. JOHN S T , CLERK OF THE BOARD OF CAO SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMININISTRATOR County Counsel County Assessor(via CDD) - � f A w ; CA Dept.of Conservation(via CDD) BY � � � DEPUTY Thomas Brenkle(via CDD) — '7 September 21,2004 Board of Supervisors County File:AP#04-0005 Page 2 BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS Thomas Brenkle, the owners of a 46.99-acre parcel comprised of APN 354-310-021, located at Cummings Skyway and State Route 4 in the Franklin Canyon area, has applied to place the acreage he owns into a new' Land Conservation Contract. Assessor Parcel No. 354-310-021 was originally placed under Land Conservation Contract No.3-69 established on January 21, 1968 between the County and Philip Brenkle, Thomas Brenkle's grandfather. Thomas Brenkle, having recently been deeded APN 354-310-021, intends to continue agricultural uses on the property, but Mr. Brenkle wants to establish a single family residence and new agricultural uses and related structures on the property that are not currently reflected in the original Land Conservation Contract signed between the County and Philip Brenkle. Thomas Brenkle desires to rescind the existing Land Conservation Contract No. 3-69 only for his property for the purpose of entering into a new Land Conservation Contract with the County. This 46.99 acre parcel would remain in Agricultural Preserve No. 3-69, but under a new updated Williamson Act (Land Conservation) contract. Attached as Exhibit "A" is a copy of a Board Resolution rescinding Land Conservation Contract No. 3-69 for the 46.99 acres comprised of APN 354-310-021 and approving a new contract, listed as Land Conservation Contract No.04-0003, with Thomas Brenkle. Attached as Exhibit "B" is a new Land Conservation Contract with Thomas Brenkle. Attachments (2) Exhibit"A" Resolution rescinding Land Conservation Contract No.3-69 as to APN: 354-310-021 and approving new Land Conservation Contract No. 04-0005 Exhibit"B" new Land Conservation Contract No. 04-0005 with Thomas Brenkle for APN: 354-310- 021 D:**tOCkMChe&ADVNPLAMLANDCONS�a OMbrenMeboo9.2a04.dm THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA Adapted this Order on Tuesday, September 28, 2004 by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors GIOA, UILKEMA, GREENBERG, DESAULNIER AND GLOVER NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE RESOLUTION NO. 2004/ 5 2 4 SUBJECT: RESCIND existing Land Conservation ) Contract No. 3-69 for the 46.09 Acres ) Comprising of APN: 354-310-021 ) AUTHORIZE the Execution of a ) new Land Conservation Contract ) No. 04-0005 with Thomas Brenkle ) For APN: 354-310-021 ) The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County RESOLVES that: On January 16, 1969, the Board of Supervisors adopted Resolution No. 69/29 which authorized the Chairman of the Board to execute Land Conservation Contract No.3- 69 with Philip Brenkle, covering 267.2 acres at Cummings Skyway and State Route 4 (Franklin Canyon area), including the 46.99 acres that make up APN: 354-310-021, and said contract was subsequently executed by the Board Chair, and recorded on January 21, 1969. On July 13, 2004 Thomas Brenkle, the current owner of APN: 354-310-021 filed an application with the Community Development Department requesting to rescind that portion of Land Conservation Contract No. 3-69 affecting APN: 354-310-021 and to enter into a new Land Conservation Contract to reflect the agricultural or compatible uses, and agricultural related structures that Mr. Brenkle intends to pursue on the property. RESOLVED, pursuant to Section 51254 of the California government Code, the Board of Supervisors RESCINDS Land Conservation Contract No. 3-69 as it affects the acres under APN: 354-310-021, now owned by Thomas Brenkle and AUTHORIZES the Board Chair to execute a new contract, Land Conservation Contract No. 04-0005, with Thomas Brenkle. The Board further DIRECTS the Community Development Department to forward a copy of this resolution and the executed version of the new contract, Land Conservation Contract No. 04-0005, to the California Department of Conservation and the Office of County Assessor. I hereby c:sr3;fy that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the Orig. Dept.: Community Development Department m'nutes of the Board of Supervisors on the Contact: Patrick Roche(925/335-1242) date shown. J° cc: CA Dept.of Conservation ATTESTED: Office of County Assessor JOHN SWEETtN, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors"d County Administrator By — _..- %}` . putt' RESOLUTION 20041 5 2 4 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Adopted this Order on September 2f,2004 by the following vote: AYES: SUPERVISORS GIOIA, UILKEMA, GREENBERG, DESAULNIER AND GLOVER NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE RESOLUTION NO. 240415 2 5 SUBJECT: LAND CONSERVATION CONTRACT } AP 04-0005 } } The Board.of Supervisors of Contra Costa County RESOLVES that: I Parties. BY THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the 28"day of September, 2004, Thomas Brenkle hereinafter referred to as "Owner," and the County of Contra Costa, a political subdivision of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as "County" do mutually agree and promise as follows: 2. Property Description, Owner possesses certain real property located within the County,which property is presently devoted to agricultural and compatible uses and is particularly described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part of this contract. 3. Pur ose. Both Owner and County desire to limit the use of said property to agricultural uses and to compatible uses specified in this agreement in order to discourage premature and unnecessary conversion of such lands from agricultural uses, recognizing that such land has definite public value as open space and that the preservation of such land in agricultural production constitutes an important physical, social, aesthetics and economic asset to County to maintain the agricultural economy of County and the State of California. 4. Intent of Parties: Enforceable Restriction. Both Owner and County intend that the term, conditions and restrictions of this Contract be in accordance with the California Land Conservation Act of 1965,as amended,so as to be an enforceable restriction under the provisions of Division 1,Part 2, Chapter 3,Article 1.5 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code(Rev.&Tax Code § 421 et. seq.). 5. Intent of Parties: Effect on Property Value. It is the intent of the County and Owner that this Contract is conditioned upon the continued existence of legislation implementing Article XIII, § 8 of the California Constitution so the effect of the terms, conditions and restrictions of the Contract on property values for taxation purposes is substantially as favorable to Owner as the legislation existing on the last renewal date. 6. Governing Statutes and Ordinances. This Contract is made and entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965 (Chapter 7 of Part I of Division I of Title 5 of the California Government Code commencing with Section 51200). This Contract further is made pursuant to and subject to Contra Costa County Ordinance Code,Chapter 84-42 and Chapters 810-2 through 810-4, and Resolutions of the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Numbers and 1 7. Land Use Restrictions. During the term of this Contract or any renewals thereof the above described land shall not be used for any purpose, other than the production of food and fiber and compatible uses as listed in Contra Costa County Ordinance Code Chapter 84-42, which is hereby incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein;provided,however,that such additional agricultural or compatible uses as are set forth in Exhibit B,which is attached hereto and is hereby incorporated by reference, shall also be permitted subject to the terms and conditions set forth therein. In case of conflict or inconsistency between the uses allowed in this Contract and those specified in said zoning ordinance, the provisions of the Contract as set forth in Exhibit B shall prevail. 8. Modification of Restrictions. The Board of Supervisors of County may from time to time and during the term of this Contract or any extensions thereof,by amendment to Contra Costa County Ordinance Code Chapter 84-42, add to those uses listed in said ordinance. Such additional uses shall be limited to commercial agriculture and compatible uses and be subject to the density restrictions of Government Code § 51220.5. Said board shall not eliminate,without written consent of the Owner or his successors or assigns, a compatible use during the term of this Contract or any renewals thereof. 9. Term and Renewal. This Contract shall be effective commencing on the last day of December, 2004, and shall remain in effect for a period often (10) years therefrom. This Contract shall be automatically renewed and its terms extended for a period of one (1) year on the last day of December of each succeeding year during the term hereof, unless notice of non-renewal is given in the manner provided by section 51245 of the Government Code. At all times during the continuance of this Contract, as from time to time renewed, there shall be a ten (10) year term of restriction unless notice of non-renewal is given in the manner provided by Section 51245 of the Government Code. Under no circumstances shall a notice of renewal be required of either party to effectuate the automatic renewal of this paragraph. 10. Cancellation. (a)Except as provided in Section 11, the provisions of this Contract whereby Owner agrees to restrict the use of the land described in Paragraph 2 maybe canceled as to all or a portion of said land by mutual agreement of the County and Owner after a public hearing has been held in the manner provided by Section 51284 of the Government Code and upon a finding by the Board of Supervisors that such cancellation is not inconsistent with the purposes of the Land Conservation Act, or in the public interest, pursuant to Government Code Section 51282. It is understood by the parties that the existence of an opportunity for another use of said land shall not be sufficient reason for cancellation of the land use restrictions imposed herein and that the uneconomic character of the existing use will be considered only if there is no other reasonable or comparable agricultural use to which the land may be put. (b)Upon cancellation of said portions of this Contract,Owner shall pay to the County Treasurer, as deferred taxes, a cancellation fee in an amount equal to the greater of twelve and one- half(12 'lz%)percent or the current fee provided by state law of the cancellation value of the property being released from the terms of this Contract. Said cancellation value shall be determined in accordance with the provisions of Government Code Section 51283 (a) and (b). Under no circumstances shall the payment of said cancellation fee be waived,deferred,or made subject to any contingency whatever. (c) Final cancellation shall be effectuated in accordance with the provisions of Government Code Section 51283.4. 11. Cancellation Upon Substitution ofNew Restrictions.This Contract may be canceled by mutual agreement of County and Owner without payment of deferred taxes or public hearing if it is replaced by an enforceable restriction authorized by Article XIII, § 8 of the California Constitution. 12. Eminent Domain Proceedings. (a) In accordance with the provisions of the Government Code Section 51295,incorporated by reference herein,upon the filing of any action in eminent domain for the condemnation of the fee title of the land or any portion thereof subject to this Contract or upon acquisition of such land in lieu of eminent domain by public agency for a public improvement, the provisions of this Contract shall be null and void as to the land so condemned or 2 acquired. (b) If, subsequent to the filing of an action in eminent domain, the proposed condemnation is abandoned as to all or a portion of the land subject to the Contract,the restrictions on land use set forth in this Contract shall, without further agreement of the parties herein, be reinstituted and the terms of this contract shall be in full force and effect,subject to the cancellation provisions of Government Code Section 51295. 13. Remedies for Breach of Contract. (a)In the event that Owner fails to comply with the terms and conditions of this Contract and the effect of said breach to render the use of land or a substantial portion thereof unfit for agricultural use,thereby negating the purpose and effect of this Contract, Owner shall pay to the County a sum equal to One Hundred Per Cent (100%) of the equalized assessed value of the real property described in Exhibit A, as established by the County Assessor on the lien date next following the date of breach, as liquidated and agreed damages, it having been agreed that actual damages will be impractical and extremely difficult to ascertain and that said measure of damages is a reasonable measure of the harm which would result from such failure of compliance. If, after the date the Contract was initially entered into, the publicly announced county ratio of assessment to full cash value is changed,the percentage payment in this subdivision shall be changed so no greater percentage of full cash value will be paid than would have been paid had there been no change of ratio. (b)It is understood that nothing herein contained shall constitute a waiver of any right which the County may now or in the future have to seek specific performance of this Contract or other injunctive relief. The enforcement provisions of the Contra Costa County zoning ordinance shall also apply if the land which is the subject of this contract is used for purposes other than those provided in Ordinance Code Chapter 84-42 or this Contract. 14. Effect of Division of Property. Owner agrees that division of the property described in Exhibit A into two(2)or more parcels,whether by sale, gift,by operation of law or by any other means, upon a finding by the Board of Supervisors that said division is detrimental to the ultimate preservation of said property for exclusive agricultural use,be construed by the County as notice of non-renewal by the property owner as provided in Section. 9 of this Contract. 15. New Contracts Upon Division. In the event the land under this Contract is divided,a Contract identical to the Contract then covering the original parcel shall be executed by Owner on each parcel created by the division at the time of the division. Any agency making an order of division or the County which has jurisdiction shall require, as a condition of the approval of the division,the execution of the Contracts provided for in this section,provided,however,that failure of Owner to execute Contracts upon division shall not affect the obligations of the heirs,successors and assigns of Owner as established in Sectionl6. 16. Contract to Run with Land. The within Contract shall run with the land described herein, and upon division, to all parcels created therefrom, and shall be binding upon the heirs, successors, and assigns of the Owner. 17. Consideration. Owner shall not receive any payment from County inconsideration of the obligations imposed hereunder, it being recognized and agreed that the consideration for the execution of the within Contract is the substantial public benefit to be derived therefrom and the advantage which will accrue to Owner as a result of the effect on the method of determining the assessed value of land described herein and any reduction therein due to the imposition of the limitations on its use contained herein. 18. Income and Expense Information. The Owner shall annually furnish the County Assessor with such information as the Assessor may require to determine the valuation of the Owner's land. 19. Effect of Removing Preserve or Zoning Classification. Removal of any land under this Contract from an agricultural preserve or removing the agricultural preserve zoning classification thereof shall be the equivalent of notice of non-renewal by the County for purposes of Section 422 of the Revenue and Taxation Code. 3 ... ..... .. ........... . . RESOLUTION 2004/525 ATTEST: COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA JOHN SWEETEN, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors y: By: pity Clerk air, Board of Supervisors RESOLUTION 2004/525 4 �'sB♦e} x TA Ri OWNER ♦ ♦ ♦ a ♦ n * e f✓. My Commission&Pifes S/27/2006 We the undersigned trust deed or other encumbrance holders do hereby agree to and agree to be bound by the above-unposed restrictions. Approved as to Form: Silvano B.k4archesi, County Counsel By. Deputy County Counse ` NOTE: All signatures for Owner must be acknowledged. 5 6 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY LAND CONSERVATION CONTRACT NO. AP-04-0005 EXHIBIT A PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Pursuant to Paragraph 2 of the Land Conservation Contract to which this exhibit is attached,the land described below is designated as the subject of said Contract. Said land is described as follows: That real property located in the County of Contra Costa, State of California, more particularly described as follows: The legal description to said property is contained in Schedule 1, consisting of pages, attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. 7 Description Parcel 354-310- 021 Beginning at post P.D.S., comer of lands of George Washington Me Near, James Stewart and Joseph Brenkle, in Rancho Canada del Hambre,Contra Costa County, California, more particularly described in deed from Bernardo Fernandez to Joseph Brenkle made May,29, 1897, and recorded September 29, 1897, in Volume 77 of Deeds, pages 140 and 141, Records of Contra Costa County, California,thence(using the survey data from Indenture, dated 30 November 1904 and recorded Dec. 1, 1904, in Deeds 107, pages 275 and 276, Official Records of Contra Costa County)from said point of beginning North 1 !/20 West, 18.26 chains (1205.16 feet)to station post marked M.B.I on westerly slope of hill;thence South 88 0 East(along fence and prolongation of same) 22.11 chains (1393.26 feet)to point A, a post in angle of fences;thence South 3 1/2 ' West along fence, 8.03 chains (529.98 feet)to point B;thence (descending) South 4%' East 17.20 chains (113 5.20 feet)to station a fence post in angle offence marked M.B.11;thence (using the freeway survey data from Grant Deed, Document 60587, dated Sept. 21, 1967, and recorded in Book 5458,pages 503 through 505, Official Records of Contra Costa County)on a bearing North 86* 00' 06" West(opposite S 860 00' 06"E) for a distance of 118.06 feet to point D; thence on a bearing South 87' 4446" West (opposite N87* 44' 46"E) for a calculated distance of 461.22 feet to point E;thence(back onto the original 1904 survey data) on a bearing North 58' 37' West for a calculated distance of 988.07 feet to the point of beginning P.D.S. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY LAND CONSERVATION CONTRACT NO. AP-04-0005 EXHIBIT B ALLOWABLE LAND USES Pursuant to the provisions of Section 84-42.402 (2) of the Contra Costa County Ordinance Code and Paragraph 7 of the Land Conservation Contract, of which this exhibit is made a part,the land uses and structures described below are authorized without a land use permit subject to the terms and conditions set forth below. Said uses and structures shall be in conformance to those authorized by Section 84-42.402(1)and Section 84-42.404 but shall be subject to Section 84-42.602 through Section 84-82.1402 of Chapter 84-42 of the County Ordinance Code. I. Existing Non-conforming Structures The following non-conforming structures are permitted, subject to the provisions of County Ordinance Code Chapter 82-8: Nene. 2. Existing Conforming Structures A 6000 gallon steel water tank. 3. Proposed Structures One single-family residence with attached garage, one metal agricultural storage shed, and one horse barn. 4. Existing Land Use Livestock grazing. 5. Proposed Land Use Livestock grazing, and ornamental tree farming. 6. Existing Use Compatible with Agricultural Use Livestock grazing. 7. Pmposed Use Compatible with Agricultural Use: Livestock grazing, ornamental tree farming, and a single-family residence. D:1p;,kkrWx dADVNPLAI,tANDCON5'apO4-0005.d.c RESOLUTION 20041.x' _5 8