The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMINUTES - 09242002 - C.75 TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS �7'„ Contra FROM: DENNIS M. BARRY, AICP Costa COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR CountY DATE: September 24, 2002 SUBJECT: Report on the County's Biennial Compliance Checklist for Fiscal Years 2000-2001 and 2001-2002 for the Centra Costa Congestion Management Program. SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATIONS FIND the policies and programs of Centra Costa County, as reported in the Biennial Compliance Checklist for Fiscal Years 2000-2001 and 2001-2002, submitted to the Contra Costa Transportation Authority (see Exhibit§ A and B), conform to the requirements for compliance with the Contra Costa Congestion Management Program (CMP), and AUTHORIZE their signature by the Chair of the Board of Supervisors. FISCAL IMPACT Compliance with the CMP will ensure the County receives its allocation of state gas tax revenues under Section 2105 of the Street and Highways Code and will maintain its eligibility for other state and federal transportation revenues. These revenues are used for transportation purposes. BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS As the Congestion Management Agency(CMA),the Contra Costa Transportation Authority (Authority) has the responsibility of ensuring that local jurisdictions comply with the Congestion Management Program(CMP), To monitor local compliance,the Authority has CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: 1 YES SIGNATURE , ECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE X APPROVE __ OTHER 7 SIGNATURE S J:``w ACTION OF BO R ON P,.p,t•mhar 2 , 2{Xf2 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED X OTHER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE UNANIMOUS (ABSENT ) AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN AYES: u,Ivv,V,I NOES: III AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE ABSENT: ABSTAIN: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. Contact: / Hillary P. Heard (925/335-1278) Community Development Department (CDD) ATTESTED Septmber 24, 2002 JOHN SWEETEN, CLERK OF cc: Public Works, Transportation Engineering THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR By 1 & l �J/V" ' DEPUTY GATransportation\Hillary\CMP Checklist\CMP_cheeklist_Board_Order.doc Biennial Compliance Checklist for FY 2000-01 and 2001-02 for the CMP Septets*her 24, 2002 Page 2 developed a biennial checklist for local jurisdictions to ensure that the requirements of the CMP are met. The checklist asks whether each jurisdiction has met the following requirements of the CMP: • Participation in multi-jurisdictional planning activities of the Regional Transportation Planning Committees (RTPC's) • Attainment of the CMP's traffic Level of Service standards within the jurisdiction; • Adoption and implementation of a Transportation Demand Management Ordinance; and • Evaluation of the impacts of land use decisions on the transportation system. Each jurisdiction is directed to submit their completed checklist first to their council or board for approval by a majority vote. Upon the council or board's approval the checklist is then transmitted to the Authority by December 1, 2002. CONSEQUENCES OF NEGATIVE ACTION Failure to approve the Transportation Water and Infrastructure Committees recommendation will cause the County to be out of compliance with the CMP, cause the State to withhold the County's allocation of gas tax revenues under Section 2105 of the Streets and Highways Code, lead to a reduction in road maintenance projects in unincorporated areas, and may prevent the use of future federal and state transportation revenues in the unincorporated area. Exhibit A: CMP Compliance Checklist for Contra Costa County Exhibit A CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY CMP COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST FOR LOCAL JURISDICTIONS To be filled out and submitted by RTPCs. Jurisdiction Contra Costa Counr Year FY 2000.2001 FY 2001-2002 1. PARTICIPATION IN MULTIJURISI?ICTIONAL PLANK Yes ` No I-a. Since submitting its last compliance checklist,has the jurisdiction X regularly participated in activities of the Regional Transportation Planning Committee (RTPC) or other forums established by the Authority? 2. ATTAINMENT OF TRAFFIC LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS Yes No 2-a. Has the Authority identified deficiencies on the CMP system in the X jurisdiction that require preparation of Deficiency Plans (i.e., standards are exceeded and calculation of exclusions does not eliminate the exceeded standard)? If yes, identify locations(s). Yes No 2-b. Has the jurisdiction been identified as contributing to a deficiency at a X location in another jurisdiction, pursuant to the methodology set forth in the Authority Deficiency Plan Procedures? If yes,identify location(s). 2 CMP Compliance Checklist for Local Jurisdictions Jurisdiction: Contra Costa Coenty Years:fY 2000y-1 and 2001-4 3. DEFICIENCY PLAN PREPARATION,ADOPTION AND IMPLEMENTATION Answer the questions in section 3 only if a "yes" answer is given to either of the questions in section 2. Answer each of the questions in this section for each segment/intersection requiring preparation of a Deficiency Plan. Yes 40 3-a. If one or more deficiencies on the CMP system is in the jurisdiction,has Ll T the jurisdiction assumed lead responsibility for developing the Deficiency Plan which follows the Authority Deficiency Plan Procedures,including specifying changes to the relevant Action Plan(s) to mare the Deficiency Plan consistent with RTPC policies and coordinating with other impacting localities? Yes Na' 3-b. If the jurisdiction has been identified as contributing to a deficiency at a location in another jurisdiction,has the jurisdiction participated in preparation of a Deficiency Plan that follows the Authority Deficiency Plan Procedures, including specifying changes to the relevant Action Plan(s) to make the Deficiency Plan consistent with RTPC policies? Yes No 3-c. Has the Deficiency Plan been submitted to the RTPC for its review and comment? Ys :�_ 3-d. Has the jurisdiction adopted the Deficiency Plan at a noticed public hearing as described in the Authority Deficiency Plan Procedures? If the Deficiency Plan has not yet been adopted, please describe its status. 3-e. If Deficiency Plans that identify actions that your jurisdiction must undertake have been adopted for road segments or intersections within the jurisdiction, please describe below,separately for each Deficiency Plan,the actions the jurisdiction has taken during the past year to implement adopted Deficiency Plans. G:\Transportation\Hi11ary\CMP Checklist\CMP_cklsit 02.doc CMP Compliance Checklist for Local Jurisdictions 3 JurisdWon:Contra Costa Countt► Years.FY 3000-1 and 2001-2 3-f. If Deficiency Plans that identify actions that your jurisdiction must undertake have been adopted for road segments or intersections within other jurisdictions please describe below, separately for each Deficiency Plan, the actions the jurisdiction has taken during the past year to implement adopted Deficiency Plans. 4. LAND USE/TRANSPORTATION EVALUATION PROGRAM Yes No 4-0. Is the jurisdiction participating in the preparation, adoption and X implementation of Action Plans for Routes of Regional Significance consistent with the CMP's long-range planning requirement as outlined in Option 1, Section 5.2. Yes No 44 If no,has the jurisdiction complied with the CMP procedures,as H H outlined in Option 2,Section 5.2? 4-c. Over the past year,have traffic impact studies consistent with the Fx1 Authority's Technical procedures been conducted as part of the application review process for all development projects estimated to generate more than 100 peak-hour vehicle trips? 'YesNo 44 Over the past year,has the cost of mitigating the impacts of land use X decisions on the regional transportation system been estimated, consistent with procedures described in the CMP,relevant Action Plans for Routes of Regional Significance, and other materials published by the Authority? 4 CMP Compliance ChedcW for Local Jurisdictions Jurisdictiion: Contra Costa Countg Years:FY 2000-1 and 2001-2 5. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS If there is any other information that the jurisdiction believes is relevant to the evaluation of conformity with the CMP, it should be attached to this checklist for consideration by the Authority. Contra Costa County has adopted and implemented a Travel Demand Management Ordinance as described in the CMP. Date Adopted May 6. 1997 Resolution # 97®12 6. REVIEW AND APPROVAL Of CHECKLIST FOR BIENNIAL COMPLIANCE REPORTING This checklist was prepared for submittal by: Steve etz Deputy Director-Transportation Planning (925) 335-1240 The council/board of Supervisor's has reviewed the completed checklist and found that the policies, programs, and activities of the jurisdiction as reported herein conform to the requirements for co pliance ith the Contra Costa Congestion Manage'ment-Program. Certified by: ohn Gioia Chair, Board of Supervisors (Date) Attest: Clerk) (Date) eputy Clerk G.\Transportation\Hillary\CMP Check1ist\CMP_ck1sit_02.doc