HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 09112001 - C.9 6. 1
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
FROM: MAURICE M. SHIU, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
DATE: September 11, 2001
SUBJECT: APPROVE Amendment No. 2 to the Cost Sharing Agreement with Contra Costa
Transportation Authority for Pacheco Boulevard Realignment, Martinez area.
Project No. 0662-6R4157
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
I. Recommended Action:
APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Chair, Board of Supervisors to execute Amendment No. 2 to the
Cost Sharing Agreement with Contra Costa Transportation Authority to increase the payment limit
for Contra Costa County's share by $44,100 to the new payment limit of$430,438 for the design
of track realignment and bridge replacement of the Burlington Northern Santa Fe railroad crossing
at 1-680 and Pacheco Boulevard, Martinez area.
Continued on Attachment: X SIGNATURE:
LA ECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
_RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
-APPROVE OTHER
SIGNATURE(S):
az=-
ACTION OF BOA N Sept. 11, 2001 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED xx OTHER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of
XX UNANIMOUS (ABSENT ) an action taken and entered on the minutes of the
AYES: NOES: Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ABSENT: ABSTAIN:
ATTESTED: September 11, 2001
AS:as:je JOHN SWEETEN, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
G:\GrpData\TransEng\2001\Bo-Te\BO Pacheco Blvd cost sharing Admentment 1.doc and County Administrator
Orig.Div:Public Works(TE)
Contact: All Schaal (925)313-2234
cc: M.Shiu,Deputy PWD
By r , Deputy
SUBJECT: APPROVE Amendment No. 2 to the Cost Sharing Agreement with Contra Costa
Transportation Authority for Pacheco Boulevard Realignment, Martinez area.
DATE: September 11, 2001
PAGE 2
II. Financial Impact:
There will be no financial impact to the general fund. The County's share of the estimated design
costs is $430,438 and will be paid for with Tosco/Solano Transportation Mitigation funds.
III. Reasons for Recommendations and Background:
One of the projects selected for funding from the Tosco/Solano Transportation Mitigation Fund
was the Pacheco Boulevard Realignment. After the Public Works Department staff began the
preliminary study for the realignment project they discovered that the Contra Costa Transportation
Authority(CCTA)was preparing the environmental document and the project study report for the
Interstate 680 High Occupancy Vehicle Lane project. Both of the projects will be replacing an
underpass at the Burlington Northern Santa Fe railroad, and it was decided that coordinating the
railroad work would save both agencies money.
CCTA with the approval of the County, and Caltrans hired HDR Inc. to design the railroad
underpasses and the railroad detour. On March 21, 2000, the Board of Supervisors approved a
Cost Sharing Agreement that defined the responsibilities of CCTA and the County. On March 20,
2001 the Board of Supervisors approved Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement, which established
the effective date of the agreement.
This amendment increases the scope of the project to include design of the storm drainage
system along the railroad right of way, and increases the agreement cost $44,100 to $430,438.
IV. Consequences of Negative Action:
Failure to approve Amendment No. 2 to the Cost Sharing Agreement could delay the project and
increase the cost.
Amendment No. 2 to the
COST SHARING AGREEMENT
BETWEEN CONTRA COSTA COUNTY AND THE CONTRA COSTA
TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
FOR CONTRA COSTA COUNTY'S SHARE OF THE DESIGN OF TRACK
REALIGNMENT AND BRIDGE REPLACEMENT OF THE BNSF RAILROAD
CROSSING AT 1-680 AND PACHECO BOULEVARD
(County Project No. 0662-6R4157)
(CCTA Project No. 1116)
This amendment changes the AGREEMENT by revising Exhibit A as attached, to
include PS&E — Drainage Design Services within BNSF Railroad Right of Way. This
amendment shall be effective as of September 1, 2001.
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION
AUTHORITY
B By
air, Boar of Supervisors Irma L. Anderson, Chair
ATTEST:
John Sweeten, Clerk of the Board of
Supervisors and County Administrator
By
Deputy
Recommended for Approval: Recommended for Approval
Maurice M. Shiu Paul F. Maxwell
Public Works Director Deputy Director, Projects
By CL+ By
Legal Form Only Approved: Approved as to Form:
Silvano B. Marchesi, County Counsel Stanley S. Taylor, Legal Counsel
By S- / By
Dep `
d'2�Ibl
EXHIBIT A (Revision 1 ) — DESIGN FEE ESTIMATE
Track Realignment and Bridge Replacement of the BNSF Crossing at 1-680 and
Pacheco Blvd.
Total Fee County County Fee Share
Task Description Estimate Percentage Estimates
Project Management $107,454 50% $53,727
PS&E — Pacheco Br. Design and $226,664 100% $226,664
50% Track Design
Geotechnical Services * $98,614 73% $71,988
Support Services (Permit & Surveys) $12,072 50% $6,036
PUC Application $22,566 50% $11,282
AUTHORITY Staff Oversight $33,280 50% $16,640
PS&E — Drainage Design Services $44,100 100% $44,100
within BNSF Railroad Right of Way
TOTAL $430,438
*Percentage Split Based Upon Assumption Described in Geotechnical Services Scope of Work