HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 08142001 - C.122 k
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
FROM: TRANSPORTATION, WATER AND INFRASTRUCTURE •... ...... �� +� Contra
COMMITTEE _ � Costa
DATE: AUGUST 6, 2001 .. ..... " County
SUBJECT: UPDATE TO THE MEASURE C-88 STRATEGIC PLAN
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATIONS
ACCEPT report from the Transportation Water and Infrastructure Committee on the
Contra Costa Transportation Authority's update to the Measure C-88 Strategic Plan.
FISCAL IMPACT
None to the General Fund.
BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS
On July 19, 2001, the Contra Costa Transportation Authority (Authority) released its draft
update of the Measure C-88 Strategic Plan (Strategic Plan)for review and comment (see
Exhibit A). The Plan considers programming commitments for Measure C-88 sales tax
revenues for the next seven years through 2007. The Plan was previously updated in
1998. The Authority initiated the current update last year, with the objective of using sales
tax funds in conjunction with gas tax revenue made available through the 2002 State
Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) in order to advance the county's highest
priority transportation projects.
On August 6, 2001, the Transportation, Water and Infrastructure Committee received a
report the Strategic Plan and requested that this report be forwarded to the Board of
Supervisors for your information. The remainder of this report from the Committee
highlights the major issues raised by the draft Strategic Plan.
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: X YES
RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR X RE7"-,7su
TI OF BO RD COMMITTEE
APPROVE OTHER
SIGNATURE(S): u ervisor John Gioiae sor Donna Gerber
ACTION OF BOARD N APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
/UNANIMOUSABSENT AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
A ( AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE
AYES: NOES: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: SHOWN.
Contact: Steven Goetz (925/335-1240)
cc: Community Development Department (CDD) ATTESTED
Public Works Department JOHN WEE EN, CLERK OF
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AYAND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
B - DEPUTY
S:ltransportation\strategicplan.bo.doc
'ADOif POSITIONS ON SMART GROWTH LEGISLATION
MAY 14, 2001
Page Two
BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS (continued)
New Funding Commitments Proposed by the Plan: The draft Strategic Plan forecasts
revenue in 1988 dollars to permit easier comparison with the Expenditure Plan approved
by the voters in 1988. The draft Plan proposes to program $39.1 million ($88) in sales tax
revenue to help fund projects receiving commitments from the 2002 STIP. This is in
addition to commitments of sales tax revenue made in the 1998 Strategic Plan, which
programmed funds to FY 05. The draft Strategic Plan proposes to program $11.5 million
($88) in additional sales tax revenue to help fund other high priority projects in the County.
These recommendations by Authority staff will leave about$35.6 million ($88)available to
program for future projects until the sales tax ends in FY 09.
Adjustment of Funding Caps Set in the 1998 Plan: Funding caps were initially set in 1991
by the Authority to compensate for reduced revenue projections. The draft Strategic Plan
proposes to adjust these caps, not to account for reduced revenue, but to fund priority
projects that did not compete well for 2002 STIP funds. The Authority proposes to reduce
the cap for the Commuterway category and raise the cap for the 1-680 Corridor category,
thereby transferring $6.9 million ($88) to several Central County arterial projects and the
auxiliary lanes on 1-680 which were unsuccessful in seeking STIP funds. These projects
are not eligible for sales tax revenue under the Commuterway category, but they are
eligible for sales tax revenue under the 1-680 Corridor category.
The Authority also proposes to raise the cap for the State Route 4 East category to enable
programming an addition $4 million ($88) to help extend a freeway-widening project to G
Street in Antioch. This adjustment did not require reducing caps for other categories since
the projection of sales tax revenue during the life of Measure C-88 increased by$4 million
in the draft Plan.
Draft Program of Proiects: Tables are included in Exhibit A that describes when the sales
tax revenue will be used on the various transportation projects. Projects sponsored by
Contra Costa County are as follows:
- No. 1213 Pleasant Hill-Taylor Safety Realignment. This plan updates the schedule
and commitment of funds from the prior plan. Funds are programmed for studies only.
- No. 1216 Pacheco Blvd. Blum-Arthur. Funds are added, in conjunction with other
sources, to fully fund construction of the initial phase of this project.
- No. 1219 Iron Horse Trail Overcrossing at Treat Boulevard. This plan updates the
schedule and commitment of funds from the prior plan. This project is fully funded.
Proiects for Future Strategic Plans: $33.9 million ($88) in uncommitted sales tax revenue
remain in the Commuterway and Rail to Eastern Contra Costa categories. Authority staff
recommends leaving these funds unprogrammed at this time pending the outcome of the
Route 4 Corridor Transit Study. Be aware that the Countywide Express Bus Study is likely
to recommend millions of dollars in upgrades to HOV facilities, which could also compete
for Commuterway funds. In addition, there may be increasing pressure from other regions
in the County to transfer funds from the Commuterway category to other categories in the
Expenditure Plan so that other types of projects in other regions could receive sales tax
revenue.
Process for Review of the draft Plan: Comments on the draft Plan are due to the Authority
on September 14. Each Regional Committee prior to that date is scheduling the draft Plan
for review. It is likely that some minor projects maybe added to the Plan in areas where
funding capacity exists. Some committees may also focus their comments on polices that
the Authority should adopt in the Plan that would affect remaining uncommitted Measure C
revenue. Also be aware that County staff has reviewed the draft Plan as it affects the
County-sponsored projects. If additional information on this matter is needed, it can be
scheduled for the Board meeting on September 11th.
Exhibit A: July 19,2001 correspondence from the Contra Costa Transportation Authority
S:1tra nsportation\stratepicplan.bo.doc
EXHIBIT A
CONTRA COSTA
TRANSPORTATION A UTHORITY
COMMISSIONERS:
July 19,2001
Irma Anderson To:. Measure C Project Sponsors
Chair
Donald P.Freitas Re: Update of the 1998 Strategic Plan
Vice-Chair
Dear Sir/Madam:
JenetAbelson The Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA) is in the process of updating.the 1998
Strategic Plan. Enclosed you will find project(s) fact sheets and the Strategic Plan Program
Charlie Abrams of Projects as.well as Issue Paper #2,which summarizes the proposed changes. The
MariaA.Iegria Program of Projects identifies the amount of Measure C funds programmed and the fiscal
Donna Gerber years to be requested.
Federal Glover . Please review the attached fact sheets and Program of Projects to ensure the correctness of
Wade Gomes the information presented (especially as it relates to fund amounts and schedule).Your
comments should be received by the Authority no later than September 14,2001.
Millie Greenberg
Julie Pierce On a separate but related matter,we would like to remind you that in order to secure
Measure C funds for your project,typically the following steps are required:
on Tatzin
1. . If seeking reimbursement for design, request appropriation of funds for design by
sending the Authority a letter detailing project scope, schedule, financial plan, and
Robert K.McCleary
Executive Director activities seeking reimbursement.
2. Request peer review at the 35% and 65°o design stages.
3. If seeking reimbursement for construction, request appropriation of funds for
construction after the peer review is completed.
Please remember to provide ample time for completing the above steps before starting
design.or construction of the project. Authority's committees and full board actions of the
above steps are required. The Authority's existing policy does not allow for
reimbursement for activities that take place prior to the approval of appropriation
resolutions. For more details about the appropriation process please refer to Appendix E in
the 1998 Strategic Plan.
Hookston square Should you have any questions, please call Hisham Noeimi at(925) 256-4731.
3478 Buskirk Ave
Suite 100.
Sincerely,
Pleasant Hill .
G4 94523
Robert McCleary
PHONE: .
925/407-0121 Executive Director
FAX.. Attachments
925/407-0128
C:\WPFrLF5\1-CCrA MTG\2001 MTGS\July 2001\7-181tr to proj5pons HN.doc
nttp.-lAff .cctaxet
CONTRA COSTA
TRANSPOR TA TION A UTHORITY
COMMISSIONERS:
Irma Anderson July 19, 2001
Chair
Donald P.Freitas.
Vice-Chair
To: Regional Transportation Planning Committees
Janet Abelson Re: Update of the 1998 Strategic Plan
Charlie Abrams
Dear Sir/Madam:
Maria.Alegna
Donna Gerber The Contra Costa Transportation Authority (OCTA) is in the process of updating the
Federal clover 1998 Strategic Plan. Enclosed you will find projects fact sheets and the Strategic Plan
Program of Projects as well as Issue Paper #2,which summarizes the program
Wade Gomes changes. The Program of Projects identifies the amount of Measure C funds
Millie Greenberg programmed and the fiscal years to be requested.
Julie Pierce
The Authority is seeking formal input from the Regional Committees. Please review
.---r on ratzin the attached fact sheets and Program of Projects to ensure the correctness of the
information presented. Should you have any questions, please call•Hisham Noeimi
at (925) 256-4731. .The Authority should receive your comments no later than
Robert.K.McCleary
xecutive Director September 14, 2001.
Sincerely,
Robert McCleary
Executive Director
attachments
Hookston Square
3478 Buskirk AveCA\ypFILES\I-CCTA MTG\2001 MTGSUuly 2001\7=16 Itr to RTPCs HN.doc.
Suite 100
Pleasant Hill
CA.94523.
PHONE:.
925/407-0121
FAX
925/407-0128
http.-1Avm.c6ta.net,
2001 Strategic Plan
Issue Paper #2
Programming Policies and Options
A. OVERALL APPROACH
Because many projects are jointly funded with Measure C and State Transportation Improvement Program
(STIP)funds,the Authority decided in January 2001 to consider the adoption of the 2001 Strategic Plan in
concert with the 2002 State Transportation Improvement Program(STIP). This delay was appropriate because
several of the projects to be included in the STIP are to be jointly funded with state/federal funds and Measure
C. Other projects are eligible for funding with either Measure C or STIP funds. Parallel consideration of both
programming documents will therefore ensure consistency, while allowing some flexibility in using Measure C
or STIP funds for certain projects. .The 2001 Strategic Plan considers programming commitments for the next
seven years through FY 2007. The 2002 STIP considers programming commitments through FY 2007.
B. ADOPTED REVENUE PROJECTIONS
In October 2001,the Authority approved Issue Paper#1, which outlined the overall approach and provided
updated revenue projections. Revenues(in 1988 dollars)were forecast to be $753 million over the twenty-year
life of the Measure, an increase of$4 million from the 1998 Plan. These projections were based on actual tax
receipts to date and assumed that the average inflation-adjusted growth rate in sales tax revenues from FY
1989-90 through FY 1999-00 would be replicated in the next ten years.
C. REVIEW OF PRIOR PROJECT SCHEDULES AND COMMITMENTS
Consistent with prior.practice, a review of projects that were included in the 1998 Plan was completed last fall.
The review of individual projects considered: (1)whether they remained on their original schedule, (2)
whether they would need a funding adjustment in the 2001 Plan Update, (3) whether they may be candidates
for additional funds in the 2002 STIP, and (4)whether any significant issues had arisen since the 1998 Plan
was adopted that might cause the.Authority to exclude the project from the 2001 Plan. The Authority reviewed
the staff report in December 2001, and approved the adjustments in schedule and funding for most projects.
With respect to the status of two projects included in the 1998 Strategic Plan,the Authority decided the
following:
EI Cerrito Parking Structure
To continue the project(Project 230 1)in the 2001 Strategic Plan---programmed in FY 2003—with a deadline
of 24 months for BART and El Cerrito execute binding agreements for a specific parking augmentation project.
The Authority also requested the City of El Cerrito to provide progress reports every six months.
The draft Program of Projects includes funding for the Parking Structure in FY 2003; the City of El Cerrito
made its first progress report in June 2001.
Brookwood Off Ramp
The authority deferred action on the project(Project 1702) and its subsequent phase, the SR24 Auxiliary Lane
Project(Project 1610)until the City reviewed the revised Project Study Report(PSR). (The Authority had
previously taken a position that the City would have to use its own resources to re-design the project and
secure Caltrans approval, because the City had reneged on its earlier approval of a specific design concept. A
revised project study report was developed with Caltrans'assistance). The Orinda city council subsequently
met on June 5, 2001 and recommended against any widening of the off-ramp, supporting instead only the
auxiliary lane between Gateway and Brookwood off-ramp. The specific Council action was as follows:
July 18, 2001 Page 1 of 3
"The council does not support the proposed project to widen the Brookwood Road off-ramp. The council
recommends that Caltrans be requested to explore construction of the auxiliary lane as the first step
toward achieving traffic safety improvements, rather than as a second phase following completion of the
proposed off-ramp widening project. This would eliminate the line of vehicles waiting to exit SR-24 from
impeding through traffic moving in the eastbound direction."
Contra Costa Transportation Authority staff and Caltrans believe that widening of the off-ramp is a necessary
pre-requisite to the auxiliary lane, and an integral component of the solution to the safety and capacity problem
at the off-ramp. Nevertheless, at its June 21, 2001 meeting, the TCC made a motion to acknowledge the
importance of the auxiliary lane project, and encouraged Orinda to request Caltrans to study the feasibility of
the auxiliary lane-only project as an alternative in the supplemental Project Study Report. If the auxiliary only
project does solve the congestion and safety issues if could then be eligible for consideration in the 2004 STIP.
Given the city council decision, staff recommends dropping the Brookwood off ramp widening project(#1702)
from the Strategic Plan. Since the project is currently programmed with a mix of Lamorinda and Southwest
Arterials Measure C funds, the Lamorinda Program Management Committee (LPMQ and SWAT would be
involved in recommending how to program approximately 5928,000 under the Gateway/Lamorinda Traffic
Program Category. In addition, SWAT would also be involved in recommending how to program an additional
5'939,000 available under the Major Arterials-Southwest Region Category.
D. ADJUSTMENT OF CAPS SET IN THE 1998 STRATEGIC PLAN
Following the recession in the early 1990's the Authority imposed expenditure"caps"on certain project
categories to compensate for the reduced revenue projections. Staff now recommends adjusting funding caps
as follows:
Interstate 680 Corridor: Staff recommends raising the cap from 80%to 87.5% creating $7.5 million (in
1988 dollars)for additional programming in this category. Raising the cap will allow programming of funds
for three local arterial projects that TRANSPAC had originally submitted for STIP funding. The additional
programming capacity in the SWAT area would be tentatively earmarked for the 1-680 Auxiliary Lane project.
(Historically, 1-680 category funds have been split 77%/23% between TRAIVSPAC and SWAT). Specifically the
following is included in the Draft Program of Projects.-
Project
rojects:Project Project Fiscal Year Programmed Programmed
Number Amount Amount
(1988 $) (Escalated $)
Commerce Avenue Extension 1214 FY 2003 2.59M 4.29M
Pacheco Boulevard 1216 FY 2003 1.83M 3.03M
Alhambra Avenue 1203 FY 2003 3.60M 5.96M
I-680 Aux Lane (seg 2) 1106 FY 2008 2.70M 5.32M
Contra Costa Commuterway: Staff recommends reducing the cap from 80% to 65%to offset raising the
cap on the Interstate 680 Corridor category. This will in effect reduce funding by$6.9 million (in 1988 dollars)
—from $36.8 million to $29.9 million.
North Richmond/Interstate 80 Bypass (Route 93h. Since the project is completed, staff recommends
adjusting the cap to 98.4%to reflect actual project expenditure.
July 18, 2001 Page 2 of 3
Route 4 (east): Staff recommends raising the cap to 95%to provide an additional $4 million(1988$)to assist
with the next stage of widening of Route 4 east from Somersville Road to"G" Street/Contra Loma in Antioch;
additional fund sources would be needed to complete the widening.
E. INTEGRATION WITH 2002 STIP PRIORITIES
In order to complement the proposed funding in the draft 2002 STIP,the draft Program of Projects includes
additional Measure C funds for four state highway projects that also are to be funding with STIP funds
1. Route 4 Railroad to Loveridge
2. Route 4 Loveridge to Somersville
3. I-680/Route 4 Interchange
4. 1-680 Auxiliary Lane Diablo to Bollinger
The 2002 STIP recommendations include additional STIP funds(in current dollars)for the following projects
that are also to receive Measure C funds in the 1998 Strategic Plan:
1. 1-680 HOV(N. Main to Marina Vista) (Project 1116): $8 million
2. SR4 Widening-Loveridge to Somersville Project 1406): $27 million
3. 1-680/SR 4 Interchange—Phase 1 (Project 1117): $5.5 million
4. 1-680 Auxiliary Lane-Segment 3 (Project 1106): $3.6 million
Staff recommends that the 2001 Strategic Plan reflect the following amounts(in 1988 dollars)to complement
the proposed 2002 STIP commitments:
1. SR4-Railroad to Loveridge Rd(Project 140513): $13.47 million
(funded from the BART Rail Ext. Category)
2. SR-Loveridge to Somersville(Project 140613): $15.07 million
(funded from the BART Rail Ext. Category)
3. SR4-Loveridge to Somersville (Project 1406): $1.02 million
(funded from the Route 4 East Category)
4. 1-680/SR Interchange(project 1117: $1.24 million to provide for environmental clearance.
(funded from the 1-680 Category)
5. 1-680 Auxiliary Lane(project 1106): $8.3 million
(funded from the 1-680 category)
F. DRAFT PROGRAM OF PROJECTS
Staff has prepared a draft "Program of Projects"(attached)which reflects all of the changes described above.
Because of the proposed deletion of the Brookwood project, additional programming of$586,000 (1988$) or
approximately $939,000 in current dollars is possible in the Southwest Arterials project category. Similarly,
the Lamorinda project category has programming capacity of$579,000 (1988$) or approximately $928,000 in
current dollars. Staff suggests that SWAT(in conjunction with the LPMC for the latter amount) be asked to
develop recommendations as to how these funds should be programmed.
Funds also remain in the"Rail to Eastern Contra Costa"and"Commuterway" categories. Staff recommends
!eaving these funds unprogrammed at this time pending the outcome of the Route 4 Corridor Transit Study.
G. REMAINING ISSUES
Following Authority review,the draft program of projects will be circulated to the regional committees for
comment. Comments should be received by September 14, 2001. Thereafter,the TCC will review the
comments of the regional committees and the final 2001 Strategic Plan will be presented to the APC and full
authority for adoption in October 2001.
July 18, 2001 Page 3 of 3 7
0
0
N n
O
00 W M
u 0,? O GD
O v r-4 00 Ln ~ Ln 00
O o M M lin• 1,0 O 000 -4 C O M
0 0 0 0 -1 tV o6 a0 O � �c 0 0 0
O o o O N M g cr 4 M O L�
p o 0 Z ' a\ O1 O N N "o o un Q x ER to to Efl ffl H} Ef? Ei} ER EE) H3 K-) % Efl
00 i
� V
v p n M N
�I o cq
°\ °\ \D . ee. m li
y O O rn O N �0 000. O O
14.4 O O o O cV N p, Lf) O Ln M M Cl \10
o 0 0 Cl 0 0 N00 O 00 Ln a\ O L6
Q P. % % % &�4 � % OAT
O Itzp
O ~ �m m O 0 m N '-4 O
� O o o N N .44M O 000 O n '14 00 0�
m r-� O o o � rn CV o 4 L� Ln �0 G
} O vi uj O\ Ln O\ N O, M 1M M 10 o O p
m rq 00 M M \0 N O\ 4 Ln O O t,�
O 000 � N �O4 M � IZV N 11 �CC
r P-4 ff-? bq to jr, Ef} % ER ER Eft EF-, ER EF} ER H} G
�O y
Ci
e ff y O O O N o 0 0 0 0 0 0 EFt
LO Ln to d! Lo O O O n
U L� K K 00 O\ m 00 00 00 G \b 000 05
O 00 00 00 ON 00
N �
r�
00w
00 O LI
Cr) 0 0 0 0 O O V ; N
.O H 0ON 0 0 0 0 It O O O O p U
0 +,
o a N 0 0 0 0 N 6 0 0 0
y r•� O 0 0 �0 0 0 0 0 m 0 0 0 0 N .�
6�J aLf) M rq 00 O Ln N 00 O\ M C\ O O N 'C M
00 \�O o iri o rn O\ O cc C) y
w O R 00 .N "o N V4 a r-1 M N -,t r4 u') O -4 Cf)
ff} » csy tq % PFJ- i q Ef} % fA. ER EP EPr ER00 �, •�
p v
OD 0 O O O O 0o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 X
[ o o c O o o O O (=) o oC:) 0 0 p
O o 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 'o
Q. va p o C, oc o 0 0 0 � 0 0 0 0 00 o Q
N 00 -114 ,-, III r-4 'M LO M in CU r. u 00
O 3 ti
z N M N M ti G tC w
Lr) Ln tf i tl) to m t ) N N K 00 y
u Ln Lr) m U) m Ln Ln Ln Ln m m � -0 •'C!
P4 O\ m a\ O\ Q` m O\ m O\ M Q\ ¢X ,� E 4)
O v Ca
o ¢ m
cc
y � � 16� Q
c p R+
U
� W ,
* G y cl 4J
o �o 0 3
i * d U +-r ER R
Cn z n cacacno
w y 'C3
y m O c t
? OD O b U
Z o a v Z y
i y
U y ° v o ° °
L Ea $ n ° U w
b bw M
co
O 'C1 O (v ami C) � p: u � x
Q cn y ca o z
Cd 0
to Q O X CL G 61 C1. U a
O y F" y cu C,3
:3 Zv 0
G 04 •p°"'0 O
Cly 5 Zw � c7 uW u° � H �" °
co N N N a0 O O O O at1 O O CO O v 00 M
i;>i5{Li`y'? J•i M n Qs u1 n n o0 FD 01 N M <D M O m O O OM1 000 Opo FOD O N O N
S '•- M M u7 00 IO O a1 FO a0 M d; VO N t0 N M N
J d' N m o co d' co m oo co ID 01 6 o0 1fi .. .. C C Fn — ID
iY U] O O O v N n v M O O O FO M M
=v a C N FO M N n m d: N N c") 01 N LO N oM0 cn•1 O n P N co 000 m
�• ";i ,�. s n 00
o0 O C�iN 1f1 Ld L N n Fq 00
00 to to
C .k
00
m
O
i$P
'10 C
'01 r N N
p n
�.a•, p
N.
00 co
Fes'::;, �;,•;�:�'' o
?LI 0 v O
5— `^ r Ln
N
rKt _ s LO 1O
o 0 o v
O Lq N m v 00
co
m LO
C4 C4
Q 4 5:.�.1• t0 O Ln N O 00 u0
3e�,,��'•;,Fa°2F� M 01 00 N tO O
CO Y.•tF?a� " 0 O v N M 00 -. M M O
u: mv co
co cq
:�;<.Tsfr M M tOO tM0
O i ao
a: o c o 1n
O N O O 00 N N
,< .;�. n � ao cq
Ir LO CD
Cq eq
ru
d• ao 0 0 0 0
00 FO M N N
A =
;a,. O O v v n v O N p O O
;: O N v v O C O
cl co
Cq
Q7 co n O d' IO — to 00 n - 1l: N 00 0D
pyyly r.� ..rp�x gray n:' p m Na,. N t0 n 00 CM00 to M t0 co CO 00 (D Q v 01
• �::•. �y M M tO O Om co M 00 O - v to N O tD n O N O N
•�s..Peq r�i;w<'s»;• Opt N FOo M M v l0 t0 v mN N 00 O 00 O mtNO onopp
LntO v O 00 00
-1�F�rh R`sa•.
00
cc to
00
1G+:fix=xu:P'•_�: ryas
Vis, ',xt•5 r_9 t e•<r:''s
. u i s"'ax: :'..
M oj
lu
s
v a"t cCa
E
fC p m h 0 h�t c N Q; .0
w7 v C ..
u
I
��.
a O C v
u D aP m
cz.S...".. ,e 4•, > k 2 s° e a a ° F i m s
0 e s O CJ
z v D k` a
Y m ? m M 9 In
,�s e � ro 0 0 0
o o o 0 o dN• dN o o 5 D A u a x E
m 00 m ao ao cay m a G x '� 9 a v c a E E r m
(O O FD (0 tD (D 'o d O D ttl D o u d 01 t0 O O O $. 0 u 00
xS m U O 0 U O 0. m O U F �; U a to. o
"a?rIos:i-
O O O is?O% O .....'':'O::' O '.:;�0 O .r 4:::� O `•''Nn. p[<'.�:
M; — — — .:5:..•: .:.;, n'aN'`'N:i'^5!;I''s�;%:N�`qN:.�:N'y"N � .f.°3:x� O iH1.
.r
�4• 1w1� 4;21!!: ,;='r.. 3 •., ? C s t m i, o r 3�a $ y1 — �'��:
W.
3
3L.a^��,�, .� x a..x x"z r:eFt ••V,� � t•"'F 2,;^ ;u6�t
T 00 00 T to O M N O T to M N TT O O T T M < 0' O N O N tD M 00 to tD n O n to -� O M m d' e� O M < ; 0 T N
CD O n N N O O lip IR . "R N n
O N N n O T T M n N t\ N Cl) y m O n 00 O 1D N N to N N
p•, < N n — .-� T T u) M M N T T M < tf, < O N 0M
NLMV O T T N tD N M t~6., N N M N N tD T
eM7 < < n of U1 O� tD N
°o
00
In
W r.a:ai}f 0
00 C O O O
IPI
I
O
00 tD co
;,r��• O O O 00
LO
L
COMD
n n n in
0 0 0 0o N
in N
m m o
5y '. 0 T T O
0 0 0LIM
0 0
in
co
CIM ' '?'.': oo 0 It It yo cq
Uo
In
j ,fl � .. T O to
N N O O f�D'
' r< un co
'tj1�v"3' O O O Q: co O M O 1ff
� ;hek'� �ak ;;e"
ry S:si"a: ry
O as-�ra�k3: ..d.:r.. •+ N O M M O O
N t3•a �i' * e W N O ^" N N
1 `m'4 !:• ...:.c, yO O IN M M n >O, n n O O 00
LO
L: O t1]
�'`.''�;•'fs=;h -• '•'� tV T d' O n O It,
1.0O cc O N
N D n T T o T N0
tD It, N p M O co O n O CP N tD
co < n N 11] n N co O m co
0 IS in 0
n T IS a o o m T o 0 < 00 M — < N o N T < N to < tD
T In M co co d' co co n n u: to tD O CO M N < N t0 m 00 N
n N N O O n O O N 0 N O n T M tb n N M n n O U7 n
n•,.sSky .:E�. N n m 00 O T O O n T M In t0 M to O to t(1 00 CD co N N
' }r O T It 00 M T n T O T < < T n N to N tD
'- T N d' N < T tD N N M .('� NN— M N M LL]
N n M1f7 T N
iy�'xx�9':�3x': M (D y�y, N N y
xIi-
r -�;
ns
� fsi ' sEt' C rp O c a > 0 0
_ f: m U W O o 0
„....s a ' a ';SLSCL
� ;` � O 3
o to E Caj
o
n to t+f W u .+ r +' CO y ;;•` E df U m p `o to
Rs s w N u It1: v T q O u
y :,sr .. r e U .] U u ,� c m a.
O F G m r�
;&�. U O
`kS
'o o
E U L m Z o _
T
m A e o o o a o 5 _ < —
z�+y;�a t/i c �Tt,i`. U �, 9 s� a u 5 0 � m m m 9
o o 0 o M
m to m m U3 U H U F �a to E 4
�• :htit`. ru,:°vn': �p ::::rv. — ��n� —
'S4ix
•S,.fid' a�a '�a�iF.i�t�4�&,;;isE'i:•f'.Qpa:,ix:•:s,.: O?'::;'::Oa::.",x:
ba �
!i•.k-p�.:O+.,..;4,i:y'"`•.'.O,'D3°«&5&?�%�:v,1_'p i
•b�d•yo(.VD .y�& v>°
,D
S^w
yt.
. 3
F` _ N M N_ d' 00 O n - O N T (D T £P 0) O T
q• F fD O N O 11: a0 n F` T M F` a0 F\ n
i_••Kx, M M M N FO N t0 Q N
�:'' .N��,A ?• .M1. -• t` N n n M '+ FD M t\ T O O 00 O N N F` N T aq C (�
N N to Q 01` T T M N a M M FD T FD n F, N00 O
N [_ FA O N T co O N M o T -0 T T .0
t° fD M fD N O aT N N 6 T T < O r O M c M a
c e ri iri o ai ci m r. ri Fri a
N
00
n a S
lrv `t C
m_
Go
n�
Cq o O O
c o 0 0
LO �•
o Ln
0 o Di Di a
to cc
to
4 3" co 0 0 o co y ao
00
LO to mco
D M T
o o O u7 O
ci
T P. N O -00 00 00 a I4 N v T
N N N U0 O N N FL FD Fa
tV ': „i •x ci
g: .,.. !:; No 0 o m °i c mFri ri ri
F Su ,;. ��.�� N N Fn fn') v v
tm
.....a, F,h
� '-' 4�'1 m r N aM0 co 0 N
N W N FOD m 00 O N :D
a . ap � M _ _
.. ,:
€:Y m cq O co co p O r n T fD Qi FD to
N co M M } FD N O a0 N T
4 isli:.�=:".1;'1!�!I�S N N LO t,
ftiy•@, e?tef F` to d' N n N N V1 T n co
<w•.'t,:::.: M r- r, FA to O — N IO CO O
.e,��.�.,s.:.'ss....�n..,,
,r"N'a'; 00 .- O .M-� T 00 M a0
w V' M co N m N M :+i M N 0 d' [� N FD f`
t- O I� O T co O FO M O T T O T V. F° O M FD
M O
to M T N O V N O O T T T N FD — N M M O
ti.':•,'... fix- Y:3 O M LOO _
%: ;aa�se3>..•;�%�`3i1:,.. ,e.,. :C fix.
14
;t i
04
' o
:;�2".:
nG44
ai,a�*3xs�jw•• L wl- .H< y � C :�;�_��' o og,£:... � O a• c
° p E 'rx �0. a m x c
o
:;..:
C m C a:, x.. \ LO u m
s.z. � fi E m � e K m a
c O :..... „ »
0 ' -gip
maRt.: a 'sv R
..,
s, > `= _ e 00
Z a J 4 <F n o R in 0 09G o
O A a Fn
m 'o
> Ai' « b °p o ? c
�.'+•�?s C P \ �. (S O > p K ,des O 5..: d, C. t9 C N N
��`�rF°"•<�� -'..� ... � a z Fn � � x � aq a m =,:D a x v � ,� 'C cIt cz
� °J
co m F `. yr m U ran vi vi F a
t
a
P�..,.at�`�^"�;.'.. „::rv.,s ��;.`•n' �'�; ,�.,,rr 3€ :�z ;o N s5:;�;: o �_ i:'f-0 m ri4rA E;:Cq ;?i o o;=�'.
r..y. Vit., ���"<;fD::'2v3'',;e•. ..� sC7._ ., ,.,. � n `.r' n m :sj+�. N ;'Fn'.:.
.R+.rt.«�: :iii�F �F:R: ';`t"..' :q,;"=• O :•:�..'.;,0:".C.
.Fa.
a�.i<;
c c o c m c
mmon °cvn � n .. ado Ci
e
-
°s-i;-;^... m 0 m o to 00 ao o o�
N
r _ N n — n m cn o o m m m o m N o 0
p'"� 00 n v O? LQ c`'1 v' N 10 O O N Cl. N N M 11v 6 tS O
k CD
o ase 4 L F F xi`t a
'R AMON
z.
S&
' n�• O} O O O ;=gyp:. m
Ilk. co
O 7"yjjS N
bSt'jr'tl-Mx '4e. d .. N
s=tib;
O O
co (O �O' O
a N N
O L61f1 O O O „Cj N
� 1vC4 cq
IP IIR cl! IN
fJ00 m
C S.tsf`?4�.�..;r..n�.\ea F=• ,,FY O O n n 0 :":M. in
G
iii
C4 CNI co
IlkWMM
";r`:,
„; n T o o n o n 3n N
O m m O v v C (0 x0 N O !�D N
cn Cl)
rl 4�'';..,:^:(�S.^••: "VSs= i 00 00 cq ..
Om ja. N cNo m N ita N
3t'::s:.s �;3•�P_s. :..,y O 00
30 M. N �
[yIDz;,:... N
Q rr►►�� ti b'„�c::
k 'arko �t O.,, �i, v
, mo co
c0
m 0'] c; c0 w>:m' m
s
CUD, co cc
O N v ?: r ' N N �y
n ;a yu N
�,nA�.: : . `K N
'i•)k;'5;:';;s.<'?=+y7^'g c0 v a0 " to 07 O_ cc N d' — z co n Cn c0 n m 6411& m
>"'.i=P:a:;•:�''a?%�m N c0 O N m 0) 0; M m v d' m a'] N v n m c'1 .-07 T
< ;':.• c;; }y�,Vs; 00 m n O QI 01 O v n n v, O m m C ..-� Q) m v m N fA O a1
eq
R uM0 O O n N c'7 m cN0 O cNA O C Cl) C O m m O O '�>E vs m
N 01 0) m N N a7 N 0) ':::�` •.•
4
r� � 'y;L';•``.va,4'a� ??-'ice' ";';`yj1i M •.,.,`•;;
W.
IMA
a h1®�Si:
,a,,E�''yyiy'�Y����.�`a�'°. •'sd'i.7 ,� �+' � `,"'$.4J b0 .w',6i a •�
`+•.5*$y't.�,s'r�<< =".+:d •�6 :? NO O N N 'Vaw
O $"
kit
o ° E B > l
.'•nit.' ,���b., .: ., u � E a yC,, u�
cd��e z«>;:y..�.. l��H � � 'C �G�pp O C
�3. .�—oz L .>�."! ca fa O
M x A \ Yr In
L±O.
r }6 c
0 O O =c;F W 'iA{' O G cam.•.
a5 co
U
p. 1: ��'. � m a.;s:�;:U:;•�U �'.0;:U N ��„—a : f,� ..xx: "M:�sT. °;oc �': o ''_� 4
;;;ss�,.'f-'f.,i,.•�..v��:,;,; •rs � c c . .:m: �;..fp;:.e�.:�:v�. o o ;a.?;�o ,a•:, o� _
rlA''`. •s�1;v f. N N N ';r.'.:V.'::��.Q:' N 3� a«`RVM yslMl.»�"`H1' FS': ^.Yf M t1
� vL.'i'Se:¢y?` ,sY'.::.e' N 'F. :.>,'cA E"'. =v:£A.;:=:'�;•`ys.�:ics<s
pp'.+,,.>,..:;n.:. +4F F,a..:.. i>rC:." xyi<3:•,.s :.5t%..�= 4:..'^LS
.jN
t�•:.ks. :'.>t'. ..,Sas
7
.Lai '.:Mi•"a
i.:
i
Ln Cl) to
Cf) to LO
CO. n 0) v N
N4 m in
Cl)00 0
!, y c0 l� v Lq [n
N
GG
00
Cq
co
LO
LO
N N
c0 L
co
co M PJ
,�,e O P P
. r '
in [n
n rmi cmCl Cln
co
Ln Ln
to
r0 ch Fh
T: ..
- C0 co
rax�rco [�
AR
UT c] e]
n: [n
P' Sa�a.x•�
faa��++ Y�•a/`f/..�'j �;, 1f1 In
ML
in in
W'" Ci
cco
v d
M co
•.
me� 'i� :-e,��.
Cq C7, Ci
co
In cc
M co
coco ci
Lr
F.<1::'€" c7 (D In n
Ir O of
'•:iro n'. m W p P D N
ra.,yz£',ti..a. g
1114.
P. a
�`-,y�'.•!4' �. RMN
,�.
i1'a
3..�^• 9..;S'i. � V O O h
a
N
S-/3
.52�?+�ds':. ds�• 00 M n O O N W 00 n n t0 O lD O to N u7 CD 01 R O to N n
O O C M cc n n d1 Ili O tD tD d' R O n LO tD O m C n R R 00
x O N N N O O tD a0 t0 00 a 0] n to tD M tD O
'.t Q N — m n C a 0 tD m .^: v to DI N D7 to M In ,J0 Q N t7 to
N M v n O t0 t0 N n M R R n N C1 t` N O M N o R N to
to N 07 R tD N Of n O O LL] M CD N 01 O V' N N � O
to �a' M R N N 'O n CD R CO F 0000 On
00
Go 00 W O
r'bC� O N N O
en
to
..
in
-
� 4ai '+JL4 D
0
• ' asy6a o
y.:.: N to
,, y
8 33y:sfa".�.. O N
G 5 :.r >. to Op p V)
!'.5'Lts3.'yAq, C iy O O O
Mae,
ysrx; y, y.
00
��:�:�'�,a• O O a0 to O
1,•':":'%•I :�,��=a' O O to O
1S' l:pYe R C N O tG
'`.• yy,
(109
on
"PeQS,: tFsn,, a C4 to
M LO O
o
iA 3;.ry;
o m o y
n to
C4 R
0;
to sri r, ri tri cj Cl)
LO
V� '£1:::x;4Q'•1� r O
oLrl
Lm
n N M n n
N of o 0) o
N N to
1 F;,<,,�Yi�sF':a :sxa.a'... ! p flNyq •r 01 Gh
ID >.
Nin
G
o N co a 00co 00
a
V`
�w-j u.� �'r o... rr. — O O n n O N T yO, M M
O LO N R LO
M
y` cD
x.
r C
00 M n O to N 00 tD N t3 F7 n p Ln
a d'
.'" O tD to M D) n n 00 O fD O 00 R R ,., in
'd�'S?: "( +� N T N N t'i 01 t0 M ^ JO o tD M n V' o
xTp,Wx .`is "...':. N T tD n N m G n to n O CA n to
O N M 00 t0 O tD O R coR t n ep O N 0
VO' N O O R O N
N a0 N N M t[: N a. 07 O
ON
',:L`�.J•a ����"5''"`' �fid;: ::!
RSC 'k ccyygg'' yy ^ �:
a saw§ ae>1 E i.~
m v _ §
CL >
tr.•�.'.t.°c'r:c..?y ': �M'. :;i. y m O C stQ c�
06.
E 0 c
Tisk�e°i•r; G E
4 .a s;V'. t r� ° y E c °' G a° u N x.
k �•-; O y a c o c
�.:..
D ` r to c th ,�4(,
Sa?.,3y�• aU+ U U U y 4 L.
4•ia"6^<Fip?.G..a i.E:„: O tE C i > > U U N f C t0 fU'. U GO y
..b Me
vsry w Oa a, O c ' ., �. c to U] c � v 9
€ �:.. � z m a — nimm
. ,ra- u > c > Q m h ti o d N c c > H 3
}.i+sa�
U L to o a' - t•J
Cd 0
AM, u a c a C ° rA ,m• a
_ �a
'O d' X: C O x U 2 N to F 'o
rn U a XU
y '.
yO r
o o �to O
CL
to 00 00 c
CD tO Sx O a2 a a m O UE
F �o
�� � � e� h•.' r x:;ni.:.°%.cl!s: t1 �w a O N ,:j:=f!!::.`;tT'::"t/t:S�".CD 'h'i:';:00 zY%'OtN
O O S O sou O°e'�•S
N <"N' N N N.st^N' i:.N :`:N>%N.?.<4V;:• [`I.'<`:�'N,
i.�= — — — — — <s;;•:-:; - —
a H Gir.
sb¢
rys1T'`
4
•�:>; ,��., .-.r. r:s:°j" Baa; y,r �:9
f
S
.'y: P'f. 07 N n ID t° c 07 n co Cl) N c0 M O O 07 N N O N (0 c O N
�y tD 0 d' Q7 — (b 'r O O 07 01 tD — N ^ rl
•xz�,, a•Y.'C ..a an0 O 007 O a°IO dN' n p tD N n 0 M t0 n 0 O n n O M M — t0 O N
n n 0 (cn M 0 N n M O N n d' M Q1 O M to O N
A.e+
u ���:• � � T N � t0 N � 00 � .—. � N n � M M N N N a' Ov N N
M N m
s`W�S
ci
71
rl
Gw•�Tti-
. m
a o 0 000
u
:. Mcq
M
N
to to
in ui
t=Sktivy ,
00
: � {S
00ao
Oq
sm-C. > .F:Y. N N in m tit t0
.. N
cq 00
00
C O coto
c0
R. " .. O O
Mco
cot
C)
;`.. LO
in
co
a
A..F'ru�,fc.NV rcoN uj t6 01 —
.3
N 10
00
Ag
x:
cli
CC. LO cl
cm
N n m (D 00
w cc 4 mt0 IN N N N n
NT
N N co 0. t, 0 O N MtC C
c7 N n n IO O7 O C7O c
n O n 01 (p M
Y;.�:34A':yc n' .:r.'• >. Ncl
N N y, N Q n N
ke.
F%.agss'd;a^i's•kF`.}�.. co cc n (M N a —
;.z.,,.w. ',a., sA• v a — 0 0 0 o tnc o a 0 c7 o n
M M �' C7
o N n c n N n o M o n N o n r)
N c0 — m n l� cj — O 07 N Cl) c (O N n N a0 0 t0 O N
M M M N p O N •- N cy O tD Uo O t0 0 N v a0 N co co
Lam. c n d, Q1 O N N N 07 M N N O e0 N
co
00 M v
i$' :'tea..... F:
''? � '
NO
s'iy,�'(q.sa:aS3g:. '2�•x,`.,Y',., %fir...
�;�r:..�."-rl si�:�='�:, -?:Rye ;S�e�' ��[7: `' ❑ O -? �i
:Wt;M o µ nccW g E E v v
it xrx' cz U W J W O O O O
a::.. " . a
E E .� O
SY' �•"�°>:f�c"",e?';:-:d �,3.!�. to N � t0 ���: _1C
to
00 wE
M M u Y N ?". ° •t$. ty Q N V O 4.
:P, 3 C i E r N :::F:FA W 'S. bU E 4� O O
�7 lAdo p Vis' ,o m c� o '� O
`yO; ° ,° .y u ° �. ° J U
Y: ��;..aa�k'-.x.,.•.�, '::(' .0 v N cs= to 3 }}. -0
.',�.��'�'°,� ??�..'� `oaf; � c > � « N �'ti "> a ;'i.;�' •Oq E o
u ,.< m L° o V
m` xers fY u ai ° 7 a S o V
tom. ; .'i` 'c
_ o
V 3 3 cc cu
a S b �C 7 4? 3 Nc ,°C u�i ro (a E
'r "`3.�yi`;t •Sz:%`` a d, d' d' y, .� G .7 ?f=' y o ❑ ti L° u `'7 Q m —u7 N
Okr`<l.. iDj�`
et3.'q: p p
<T,� .}:V1. r^1v7.. S ".s'.Ot `D��:,p. b ,:':`O r..:<.'.W.�,:�'.D.'°�.O:Y:'•YJ b
NY
,O V
..W
v ?ar.
t
�A
4a G 4
M�
[LASH•`
..wx-�-+- ..... ...... �...:•. :. :y,,;;:z:�:":..,.... _.✓sA:. s Vis:„
► wb ra a C° o m o —
.� , u�i v n o vni M o N = cNv o o O `!' voi [N`] m n o o OND dN' rn N
...- .. &�£.' n ao N ao eq a to °� a) a °� o o ao n a m
. s o to (D a N aD O a Ont QM1 '" n0 O � � _C.: d' � N C4 O O O -n-' to N M
.�,.. T N N 00 M n oD N N O Cn O N N !° O CO e'
.. O? M n In
Cn F COV O J O N COV n M
A^ `
cli
La .. ,.
'x.... r to
4 00 00 00
00
co
�•�..%.�,. O O O O
yS � N
ai
..o ° o 0
•''.4'»"r'iltf'- 00 o Np N O O p
i o
00
0
C"'.< a o 0 0 o c
O } N O n
co co
v y; °o
00 co 0 0
F� La O`f N N N N p p
0 O
O n O n
N N r
Cq
p Ji
O d,i r C x O O N O O
'yL F N N N
v :V O O N
!O M
m N
"V•.,[.Vi:�. M N M m N N
A '7 Eta i?ir.J Gk M N O O _ _ M CD C in
00 O O Q
6 O O O C COO v co n O N M
M 0+ N Cy ?., ?.. CO 00 N T
O O 0) O N CO O O O O n N O C70 N O C0
3«:'H•'�:;#u;;<:)),•�x.'zir?€Sh d' C O M — CO kf? O LO N N O CO co V' O O
'';M•.^s's,KF^'.€�:hl,'��7 O O aD N N O O N O N O Q� N O O N M CD a0 n O
�, O p v p 01 p O
CO O n M 01 O 'I a, n MO n v n CO O
�i o: N•::xrLV' 01 N M O 0: 0) --� O O O — O C — to -• CC
0) M n aD O O O s d' .- O M CO v O
> co n M > to ,pr, > o N to In o
ikyFe�'u33i"a:�`�
ViN
as
�fS�G sc
r.;•s g"��`'`,x.'� U u c O ';''{ O r fZ :?z:�` 9 �i?.U' u e: O _
NCL
m m
u d m m C a
CL
In
cd r 10
:<3Y�•PCA, .k.'yga. N co
1 St m .;�. Se c d en , `sok. o m $ o a
v u 4ztGi t m u t4 p a�
Ei
3 a "ca 0
a CL
` rr< a 3 g v o o J
m (x q m V c t Ar' o a 0
oC? rya o > > c >
m
x>•..7;.r;S' .:;s',n m Z'
�1W 7i -ca cef 5 W �m v v7
o
m F y ! 3 w N m v N F "; F x. o"o
f:¢.X.., sk.'8:'..FyppS•i ax {� ..:Rl.�, �'•"' <r,M1' y;,iM1 s".Y f< C� i�7s�"' m ,.pp O p t,O-'Q. — — q�
v^
i ti
3 yin;
?Sr. —
"�r
m•4
4..
x�
j�
ss sr^m�
�ei'a1.N A^9cIl,'� .:,..... .........:s,:" .:.....1::.::':s'. :{;::�;:< ::?'s:. (3�.. �y.`R°€&.•',' = t'"=�3�`ita n`c`..1'
V" i ••3� :1 O N tD n •• O o Of a0 m0
w,;y. t, 00 00 LL] .�. •., O a O to O 2 Opo O _ p mo wrN; p
r� in
00 O a 0 01 O O O 0 111 O Q) ... N 00 n 01 O
n N m 00 01 tDto
01 f0 O f� In _ O city to
O O N cf100
C1 cD a .. O fD a N CD
a to VO' Ln
F,�e`�:
N N N O F O O F
10to
cn
�sTN.
k ;. O ;;%c0. >
n � 3
_
00 00 00
, s o `0400co
00
_ ..
LN
10
co
Ln Ln Ln
LO
00
cq
00 co
Cli
i O O
s _
' T .
s�y
.`•.;..0?'i':C ;Mr''s; O N O O O n n p j i lA 06
CC �'•;>ti. ,'x.^31:((:�;� R N t0 to .07
:,':*\1►w'bS } a a :111 opo
N
r;
"''' O A OWN
O G
co O O cq t`7 tD a' c; O IIj C1 1"1 �� c`0
O 07 +07 O .. 06
FiE'r<:4 ;rj: l0 1
Cq Lnco to
ID
ro
Cq
co
o o ;p
N �,... •,ate W N o ^ p o
sem... '�L• O to
L^ nAr".•` ':4ir':,;tYi=�.,,. apo
N co
s -5:•::i.. Yfos
m c m
a 'IN
n —o LO O'rW }O O N O ;r:.N cOo
to
N 07 .0 O N a O O 01 p �y V7 O :arty
n COa
n°
AN-MM-M, p a o a x n o 0 o N o 0
`4^- •�'.. O 00 coC d: O p Lh O O O M O fD O O
xs;i .S,?:�: ',:;v.�'^: p v p tD O 0) O N O t0 O r O «jN 00
.>;3$,'w+'3e a'i?,r�� ::1 14 r N O 00 ?1 07 p 0j 01 C — O a O C
3:k s.° .i..P�'ai.. O a, r — N LO _ 0'1 .. O n O 00 01 C O v' O vr� p
TIP.
01 N mn ID N O a '� Q7 n Q1 O tD — a p p m co
ial*fjs:
ter' ' 'ri7,tss�!l; 11f`t ;ir x%F•?. t, i.`t :.j3
,. 5,.. x�•a: :F.,3�3C hv:`.[�!!' O U 1my�
ii:N3 y�ySrP�;i N •p a,;.:=;. i33 O .3"€`..:p:
•.. 4U i�:iASi L z`�a8
nnAl
j C
'a 1.8
lu
lE
u to
�
FIN
,o p u Ut,-.'R3 U °'R1'
vi 0
Niz
rax •• . . a zt O � ,p ...„?;« mN q�. Y OS m N Y i'•£R'
k '.• : E e C o D O F u a u m
•.6'`.•'.:..,, ::�0. >, 'c� Q � h to ;�tsf.:� � a' wLLj
E�eh:�t,:;;',,:�-.' ,••���y��g�,� p 5 a � p m � •ee � w � z a yCL
m �
eAr6st 00 C� 00 al`'r. '. G _ 9
to N C O Qr G: o GO O ,y O O o (n y t0 O ..iC i u
3 G
s c: ? n o — to (n U U
I.tN, '. a�3F`
LIN
' N N N
. '•;:'
'i•
!=F`
�T'w
cq
1•
00
In vi
CO N
ID
0. Sk r• xTi�,��° � ^r
00 ODin
tr
• N
MT
PIR
coO
i SY:;b;'...tip .•.?:x L
07,
to
�
N
LO
N
00
in
.V. C3• "m:t.t C
cq
cq
LO
I LO
in
CCii� N
'A.
n
O
N ;,;<
LO
to c�7
In
ea
N to
O
T, Ir00o
o x
Ln LO
Lo
NMI
co
pN om. Cl) N p
AS'd.'. ice:�y 01 N C7 tC.
V.
cq
TO
;x:
g:sssi dC >, C
to
lcxl
{ s > c 0 c
y•mF,:e.: UI u C F C
r:.. �:. v
M m n
Y � W o0 4
A k a a �a1 a,, �r00i
2001 DRAFT S�RATEGIC PLAN-Fact Sheet CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
1-680/BURNETT i'r �' Left turn
movement
AVENUEI removed
NORTHBOUND �o` 1 remnal
oved
ON/OFF-RAMPS 7\ '
PROPONENT:
CONCORD
PROJECT
1101
�.• I I inl �71t
removed
DESCRIPTION: \ ��
This project provides new o tim \
�` Auxlliar lane from
northbound on/off-ramps from I- //j lad Q,� willow Baas Road.
680 to Burnett Avenue, a L 1l
northbound auxiliary lane from ==aoTF cine RD
Willow Pass Road, and removes 1 1`
the existing northbound off-ramp `I
at Concord Avenue. It required
the widening of the existing I-680 LEGEND
structure over Concord Avenue
— —=
and the modification of existing EXISTING
® PROPOSED
signals on Concord Avenue east ® SIGNAL
of I-680.
STATUS:
Construction completed in 1995.
FUNDING SOURCES ($ X 1000):
Federal 230.0
State 2,770.0
Measure C $ 1,525.2
TOTAL $ 4,484.9
Measure C funds shown in escalated dollars.
Actual commitment is in 1988 dollars as shown in
Appendix A.
7/19/01 Draft Appendix D D 1 �_�9
2001 DRAFT STRATEGIC PLAN-Fact Sheet CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATIONAUTHORITY
NORTH MAIN
STREET BYPASS
(LAWRENCE WAY)
PROPONENT: ,_� �* � •
WALNUT CREE
PRO45 gym\
I. .•:
DES 1PT y'' New Median ` 11 i ; \\ `1 I N ��\\ Retaining Wall
The No` amain Street Bypass `y�\�
Closed to Pu611e
(Lawrence Way)provides a new
1 New Median
one-way roadway from Pine
LEGENDVd Widenings,16 1
Street to the northbound I-680 on- a 5 N. Side
ramp. The roadway consists of
---- EX
S 1 � Retaining Wall
two lanes from Pine Street to just
R ED it c �� i \
north of Parkside Drive where an ..-•.-_ NEW CONNECTOR ROAD '
..... ,' `� \ b New Street
on-ramp from Parkside Drive (BY CALTRANS) Modify Signal �� to
enters,creating a three lane road ® NEW SIGNAL \\X QX
to the end of the project. The New Median \
roadway includes a 180-foot-long Retaining Wall \\\ { �\l-Siogna
structure over Parkside Drive 1 {
with retaining walls on both sides. I
Parkside Drive has been widened
between North Main Street and
the Bypass and a new signal has
been constructed at the entrance
to the Bypass on-ramp. Two
existing signals have been
modified on North Main Street
and North Main Street has been
reconfigured between California Boulevard and I-
680 from its original three lanes in each direction to FUNDING SOURCES ($X 1000):
four southbound and two northbound lanes by
shifting the median and restriping. Local 2,768.4
Measure C ' 8,520.0
STATUS: TOTAL $ 11,288.4
Construction completed in 1996.
Measure C funds shown in escalated dollars.
Actual commitment is in 1988 dollars as shown
in Appendix A.
D 2 Appendix D 7/19/01 Draft /
2001 DRAFT STRATEGIC PLAN-Fact Sheet CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
STONE VALLEY r
ROAD
INTERCHANGE
MODIFICATIONSL j4
PROPONENT: I
�o \
u
CONTRA COSTA
TRANSPORTATION
AUTHORITY ly �►� v� ,
PR`OJE,
1104
DESCRIPTION;
This safety improvement project
realigned the existing off-ramps
to eliminate a free merge zone at I
g
Stone Valley Road that presented
a hazard for pedestrians,bicycles,
and vehicles. The realignment LEGEND �� \
changed the four off-ramps`to
"tee" intersections on both sides =___= EXISTING \
of I-680, providing pedestrians PROPOSED
and bicycles a safer crossing at
each off-ramp and improving
vehicular sight distance.
STATUS:
Construction completed in 1998.
FUNDING SOURCES ($ X 1000):
Measure CLE ,$)I 964.6
TOTAL $ 964.6
Measure C funds shown in escalated dollars.
Actual commitment is in 1988 dollars as shown in
Appendix A.
7/19101 Draft Appendix D D3
2001 DRAFT STRATEGIC PLAN-Fact Sheet CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATIONAUTHORITY
1-680/EL CERRO I
BOULEVARD +
INTERCHANGE
RAMP
SIGNALIZATION kv
J
PROPONENT: ` New
DANVILLE s�9�a1 i
EL COM M
PROJECT
110:5 lzl \"
4o
DESCRIPTION:
In order to move traffic more
efficiently between El Cerro Blvd. lji wal
and the 1-680 on/off-ramps,two
p � � \
existing stop sign intersections
have been signalized. Overall,the
project included the design and LEGEND
installation of two coordinated — — — EXISTING
traffic signals,restriping,new
PROPOSED
pedestrian ramps to meet ADA
requirements,reconstruction of
failed pavement sections,
pavement overlay and median
improvements.
STATUS:
Construction completed in 1994.
FUNDING SOURCES ($ X 1000):
Measure C (Esc.$) , 487.2
a
TOTAL $ 487.2
' Measure C funds shown in escalated dollars.
Actual commitment is in 1988 dollars as shown in
Appendix A.
D4 Append&D 7/19/01 Draft p�p�
2001 DRAFT STRATEGIC PLAN-Fact Sheet CONTRA COSTA TRANSPOR TA TION A UTHORITY
1-680 AUXILIARY / MAP ac�kn
LANE DIABLO
ROAD TO da
pD U A
D1A8L0 N
yQRT S7J
BOLLINGER
CANYON ROAD m
♦/
gYOAMORE VALLEY
PROPONENT: 1
CONTRA COSTA
TRANSPORTATI 'y
AUTHORITY., 9
9
PRO T p►
110
DESCR 'tibN:
This project proposes to construct
auxiliary lanes in the I-680
corridor from Bollinger Canyon
Road in San Ramon to Diablo P°
Road in Danville. These P° sus
improvements include an
additional 12-foot lane between
OPO sq Fa LP
interchanges in the northbound r ,
and southbound directions, �e 9y°ti
retaining walls, and new
soundwalls in the corridor. Also
included is the structure widening
over Laurel Drive between cFq CANYON.:
Sycamore Valley Road and e�`O
Diablo Road.
STATUS: FUNDING SOURCES ($ X 1000):
A corridor planning level study was completed
in September 1992. A Project Study Report Measure C (Esc. $)' 14,670.0
(PSR) was prepared and approved by Caltrans STIP 9,000.0
in February 2000. Preparation of the environ- STIP (2002 Prop dLocal N, 21,060.0 3,600.0
mental document started in June of 2000. �^
Three construction segments have been identi- Other (TBD) 6,700.0
fied. All segments will be covered in the TOTAL $ 55,030.0
environmental document however, only Seg-
ment 1, is fully programmed for construction
with combination of Measure C and State ' Measure C funds shown in escalated dollars.
funds. Design and construction of Segments 2 Actual commitment is in 1988 dollars as shown in
and 3 is proposed to be funded with a combina- Appendix A.
tion of Measure C, Local and to be pro-
rammed State funds.
7/19101 Draft Appendix D D 5 5 ��
2001 DRAFT STRATEGIC PLAN-Fact Sheet CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION A UTHORITY
FOSTORIA
PARKWAY
OVERCROSSING
\y\ \ \ New signal K
PROPONENT:
SAN RAMON J,;~^\jh\ \1 \\ 315' TWO SPAN lryo{DD...a00
OVERCROSSING C Of
PROJECT NO ;�1 osj0ON
110 L \ Modify existln dI n
I II\
o ~\\
DESCkIPTIO,N:''�
Gee 11 II \®\, \ \ CL
G D
The six-lane overpass extends g ,� �I 111 \
Fostoria Way over I-680
\ EXISTING
approximately 1,100 feet north of
PROPOSED
the I-680/Crow Canyon Road ?� �,��I CITY BOUNDARY
interchange and has provided new \ \
_� � ® NEW SIGNAL
signals at San Ramon Valley
Boulevard and Crow Canyon Place ` ��` ��� J00
No new ramps were provided for I- o{��y
680 in any direction. \ \ \
a
STATUS: \ \\
Construction completed in 1994. \\\.\ \�
\\x`'91 � \
FUNDING SOURCES ($ X 1000):
Measure C (Esc.$)' 13,212.4
TOTAL $ 13,212.4
' Mcasure C funds shown in escalated dollars.
Actual commitment is in 1988 dollars as shown in
Appendix A.
D 6 Appendix D 7119101 Draft (/
2001 DRAFT STRATEGIC PLAN-Fact Sheet CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATIONAUTHORITY
ROUTE 242/
Existing structure
CONCORD to e widened.
�
I
AVENUE
INTERCHANGE ` O
PROPONENT:
CONTRA COSTA
TRANSPORTATION
AUTHORITY
/CONCORD
PROJE'6iN �4'\
Off-ramp to \/
1 O; be removed—�
LEGEND
DESCN: o >
1
Improvements at the State Route � � EXISTM
242/Concord Avenue interchange ® PROPOSED
include a new northbound loop �\ ��' SOUNDWALL
on-ramp, a new southbound loop \\ ® NEW SIGNAL
on-ramp, realignment of the \�
existing southbound off-ramp,and
construction of northbound and -- \
CDMCORD
southbound auxiliary lanes ® AVE
between the Concord Avenue and + To bei
removed.
Grant Street/Solano Way < < Modify signal.
interchanges. These q
improvements include three new
structures and the widening of two
others, the widening of Concord
Avenue and State Route 242,
paving,restriping and new signals
at the four off-ramp intersections. FUNDING SOURCES
Approximately 8,600 feet of ($ X 1000):
soundwall were constructed along ' 6,000.0
Federal
both sides of State Route 242 to y
State 1,608.0
mitigate existing noise impacts. L __1i
ocal 1 9,800.0
Measure GGE sc.$)' 14.961.7
STATUS: TOTAL $32,369.7
Construction completed in 1997.
' Measure C funds shown in escalated dollars.
Actual commitment is in 1988 dollars as shown in
Appendix A.
7/19/0I Draft Append&D D7 _�C
2001 DRAFT STRATEGICPLAN-Fact Sheet CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATIONAUTHORITY
ROUTE 242 1
WIDENING
I
PROPONENT: 4 �3
CONTRA COSTA I a�
TRANSPORTATION
AUTHORITY � .` HOZ
F
9
r� SO4 4 9p
PROJEC
11 ' wqY
DES IPTI i
This projevidened 3.4 miles of
existing State Route 242 from C0Ne0
four to six lanes from I-680 to 0�
State Route 4. The improvements 0
included widening the roadway by Z
decreasing the median width to eP55 �o
allow for one additional lane in
each direction, constructing
drainage improvements,building
soundwalls and restriping.
Right-of-way acquisition is not
anticipated, since all widening
occured within existing State
right-of-way.
STATUS: FUNDING SOURCES ($ X 1000):
The project was advertised by Caltrans in late '
March with construction starting in July 1998. HB 311 500.0
Constriction was completed in early 2001. Measure C 35,567.3
V`K
TOTAL $ 36,067.3
' Measure C funds shown in escalated dollars.
Actual commitment is in 1988 dollars as shown in
Appendix A.
2 Funding from both the I-680 and commuterway
project categories.
D 8 Appendix D 7/19101 Draft -�
2001 DRAFT STRATEGICPLAN-Fact Sheet CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATIONAUTHORITY
W r I e o t C r e e k _
NO 8 NOV LANE P I r r r n t H i I I
r
co A �
N�r 27
b
b < 9
W l o o t C r e e k
C o o e o r d
1�1apS &ein9 Upc C)-
P l a e a l l
BEGIN SB HOV LANE34
\`
\ a wxco W
C o a e o r a � �
BEGIN NB NOV LANE
YJ J IN NB HOV TOL
` PLAZA BYPASS LANE
1-680 HOV LANES Structures that require widening include the Grayson
(NORTH MAIN STREET TO Creek Bridge, Blum Road and Center Avenue
MARINA VISTA undercrossing structures, and the East Martinez
Railroad un' erpassing structure.
PROPONENT: STATUS:
CONTRA COSTA The CEQA/NEPA environmental clearance was
T RA N S P O RTAT I O K-\ obtained in December 1999.
AUTHORITY .
Final design is in progress, by Caltrans, and should
be complete by early 2002
PROJECT NO.
1116C Construction is expected to be completed by 2005.
DESCRIPTION:
This project will provide a new HOV lane on I- FUNDING SOURCES ($ X 1000):
680 in the northbound direction from SR 242 in
Concord to the Marina Vista Interchange in Federal /�''� 5,250.0
Martinez. This project also provides an HOV lane STIP _ 31,654.0
on I-680 in the southbound direction from the STIP (2002 - 8,000.0
Marina Vista Interchange in Martinez to North Measure C /'`J 2,202.0
Main Street in Walnut Creek. TOTAL $ 47,106.0
This project is accomplished by minor widening
of the right shoulders and restriping I-680 lanes to ' Measure C funds shown in escalated dollars.
a combination of 11-foot and 12-foot wide lanes. Actual commitment is in 1988 dollars as shown in
Appendix A.
7/19/01 Draft Appendix D D 9
sal
2001 DRAFT STRATEGIC PLAN-Fact Sheet CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
Y
M(3 ps Been
U �4c
_ =_ -
_ TELvt.E -
1-680/SR 4 INTERCHANGE:
IMPROVEMENTS FUNDING SOURCES ( x 1000):
Measure C (Esc.
PROPONENT: STIP (2002 Proposed '5,500.0
CONTRA COSTA
TRANSPORTATION TOTAL $ 2,022.0
TRAN �. -
AUTHORITY
Measure C funds shown in escalated dollars.
PROJECT NO: Actual commitment is in 1988 dollars as shown in
1117 Appendix A.
DESCRIPTION:
Conceptual engineering studies were performed which
recommend an ultimate interchange reconfiguration,
which can be constructed in fundable stages. The
suggested improvement strategy includes a two-loop
and two-direct connection freeway to freeway
interchange as well as a reconstruction of the
interchange at Pacheco Boulevard.
STATUS:
Conceptual engineering studies were completed:in fall
2000. A Project Study Report(PSR) for the
interchange project is expected to be completed by Fall
2001.
D IO Appendix D 07/19101 Draft
2001 DRAFT STRATEGIC PLAN-Fact Sheet CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATIONAUTHORITY
ALHAMBRA
AVENUE -'
WIDENING
a r
PROPONENT: f
MARTINEZ ��
3 1
i \ �\\sem �• 8
PROJECT-NO: a
� rv`gi � war
1203
0
IF
DESCRIPTION: AW11 '
Thisro ect widened and
p / LYEY DR Cit °/
Cit
upgraded an existing two lane
arterial to accomodate four lanes
from
Alhambra Hills Drive to Shetland %P
Drive transitioning north of o
MacAlvey and conforming to the
gE71NAY �
existing four lane facility south of EGEND ���
Benham Drive. This project '""`AW
r
modified five intersections, __= EXISTING ,���%�\�M011r Q
including signalization at PROPOSED
MacAlvey Drive and the ® NEW SIGNAL
installation of new left turn lanes
9 EXISTING SIGNAL Cit °fAfw�tinai
sidewalks, bike lanes,retaining city°7—aE:wlf ,o
walls, soundwalls, and °tI''i°
�.r
landscaping.
STATUS:
Construction completed in 1996.
FUNDING SOURCES ($ X 1000):
Measure C (Esc.$)' 100-tt 2,117.9
o
TOTAL `` ' $ 2,117.9
' Measure C funds shown in escalated dollars.
Actual commitment is in 1988 dollars as shown in
Appendix A.
7/19101 Draft App endlr D D I I
2001 DRAFT STRATEGICPLAN-Fact Sheet CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATIONAUTHORITY
TAYLOR
BOULEVARD/
PLEASANT HILL/
ALHAMBRA ROAD
INTERSECTION I �P
IMPROVEMENT �P
PROPONENT:
PLEASANT H 9`
PRO NO:
12 .5
DES I.PT,l01�1:�
This project widened the
intersection of Taylor Boulevard qs .
and Pleasant Hill Road to provide SLATER AVE
additional capacity for the inter-
section. The project includes
�a
additional left turn lanes,
relocation of storm drain inlets,
modification of the traffic signal,
installation of signal interconnect LEGEND
to the adjacent signals,restiiping ids PROJECT LIMITS
and other associated work.
STATUS:
Construction is complete.
FUNDING SOURCES ($ X 1000):
Measure C (Esc.$)'
rFr�: 536.9
C f N •vi.,
TOTAL KII< $ 536.9
' Measure C funds shown in escalated dollars.
Actual commitment is in 1988 dollars as shown in
Appendix A.
D 12 Appendix D 7/19/01 Draft _30
2001 DRAFT STRATEGIC PLAN-Fact Sheet CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATIONAUTHORITY
SOUTHIN
ROADWAY
EXTENSION --_J '-= I
� V1
PROPONENT: ��•�,�, 111�� \,�r%a� I
WALNUT CREEK \ �Ic LASLOMA9
�o 1=
\ Is HIGH SCHOOL
PROJECT IyA:
DESCRIPTION.:
The project-provided a secondary
southern access to the core `��
downtown area, a parallel route in
the I-680 corridor, and improved '\��ti NIVN01
IS
access to 1-680 at Rudgear Road. E Wu O �`�\\�\� \`
The City of Walnut Creek split L—— EMTM C��
the project into the following five PROPOSED
phases: 1) the channelization of — POESrRIAN
OVER CROSSNO
San Ramon Creek and theSOLNDWAU
construction of a concrete top for
use as a roadway surface; 2)the .�
construction of a two lane street
from Newell Avenue to.Rudgear
Road with accommodations for
pedestrians; 3) the construction ' ;� \�'� t
of a soundwall along the east
boundary of the travel corridor;
4) the modification of the existing
1-680/Rudgear Avenue
interchange to more efficiently FUNDING SOURCES
handle the traffic as a result of the ($ X 1000):
extension of South Broadway; Local "'�
& 10,013.0
and 5) landscaping between
Newell Avenue and Rudgear Measure C (Esc_ t „�� 7,343.7
Road. y
TOTAL $ 17,356.7
STATUS:
Construction completed in 1996. ' Measure C funds shown in escalated dollars.
Actual commitment is in 1988 dollars as shown in
Appendix A.
7/19101 Draft Appendix-D D 13 _�/
'2 001 DRAFT STRATEGIC PLAN-Fact Sheet CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATIONAUTHORITY
MONUMENT
Add two turn lanes.
BOULEVARD/ Add two lanes and
I move retaining wall.
CONTRACOSTA Add one right turn Ions
hk tand one westbound lane.
BOULEVARD/ ► % '
� / Rastrip• and
B US KI RK AVENUE i realign intersection.
PROPONENT:
PLEASANT HILL- �� ���
II
PROJECT NO:
1210
J® MONUMENT J
DESCRIPTION:
This project realigned and I j
widened Monument Boulevard to
accommodate the additional / /
traffic from Caltrans'I-680/ — R
Monument Boulevard urban W) I / / ti/ �
interchange project. This project conform to new interchange.
also widened Contra Costa Urban Interchange (by Caltrans).
Boulevard between Gregory Lane
and Boyd Road, improved Add right turn lane.
Gregory Lane,and the Add one lane eastbound.
intersection of Buskirk Avenue LEGEND
and Monument Boulevard. -___= EXISTING
PROPOSED
STATUS: I£ NEW SIGNAL
Construction completed in 1996.
FUNDING SOURCES ($ X 1000):
Local 258.0
;.. °°
Measure C (Esc.
., ' +. J'•..t 7,015.4
`,:.
y!
TOTAL '' $ 7,273.4
i Measure C funds shown in escalated dollars.
Actual commitment is in 1988 dollars as shown in
Appendix A.
D 14 Appendix D 7/19/01 Di-aft
7 ��
2001 DRAFT STRATEGIC PLAN-Fact Sleet CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATIONAUTHORITY
PLEASANT HILL
ROAD/ TAYLOR
BOULEVARD
REALIGNMENT
I
PROPONENT: I
CONTRA COSTA
COUNTY ==
P 15 C T a �o
1 3
KERKoSVN.lN
i
DES ION: /�'��6'
This project consist of realigning o��y
the Pleasant Hill Road and Taylor
Boulevard intersection. The aSaNt A o,,
realignment is a safety measure to G�so
reduce the number of accidents /.' SyGio�ti 2
and improve driver comfort.
LEGEND
STATUS:
®' .PROJECT LIMITS
The project involves the County,
Lafayette, Walnut Creek and
possibly Pleasant Hill. The
County has had the project limits
surveyed and ready to start
preliminary alignment studies.
FUNDING SOURCES ($ X 1000):
Measure C (Esc.$), SQA' 121.5
Developer Fees oc211F'edetal 3,400.0
TOTAL '-' $3,521.5
Measure C funds shown in escalated dollars.
Actual commitment is in 1988 dollars as shown in
Appendix A.
7/19101 Draft Appendix D D 15
•2001 DRAFT STRATEGIC PLAN-Fact Sleet CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATIONAUTHORITY
COMMERCE
AVENUE
EXTENSIONCJ
J
PROPONENT: I �4e4,r.i, Q
CONCORD Q
'90"44 Ay !u
PROJECT NO: l \ wq°°SrRl4� rum
1014, •�.. 'Y C'1
U
DESCRIPTIQ.N:'
This proyect.will extend
Commerce Avenue between Pine °� Commerce.,
venae.
Creek and Waterworld Parkway. 930 s1
den p°
The extension parallels SR242
and connects Willow Pass Road
with new freeway ramps at
Concord Avenue. The project °
improves downtown traffic zaz
circulation and enhances access to
the I-680/SR242 corridor by ePyy
redistributing the traffic currently
using the ramps on I-680 at
Willow Pass Road and SR242 at
Clayton Road. Measure C funds
will be used for Construction.
STATUS:
Project design and environmental
work will begin in 2001 and
construction is scheduled for
2002-03 .
FUNDING SOURCES ($ X 1000):
Local 1,700.0
�tri `t� `.:
Measure Cis s%.1 4,291_7
TOTAL $ 5,991.7
Measure C funds shown in escalated dollars.
Actual commitment is in 1988 dollars as shown in
Appendix A.
D 16 Appendix D 7/19/01 D►•aft _
2001 DRAFT STRATEGIC PLAN-Fact Sheet CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION A UTHORITY
w'•
I
Phase. 3 Phas.e 2
o �
G
x L__ co
o
uU GE-ARY 0 RD)FVT1
Fff a
Nt —i^^ w
1 �
a
h
s
G EARY ROAD STATUS:
IMPROVEMENTS Design for project is complete. Project construction
is scheduled for August 2001 with a target date for
completion in October 2002.
PROPONENT:
WALNUT CREEK
FUNDING SOURCES ($ X 1000):
PROJECT NO: '
1215 (Phase 2 only)
Local s.. ' 2,326.0
Measure C u., ' 1,979.5
DESCRIPTION:
This project widens and reconstructs Geary Road TOTAL $ 4,305.5
to provide one through lane in each direction, a
two way left turn lane,bike lanes,parking and
sidewalks along Geary Road from North Main
Street to Pleasant Hill Road. The project has ' Measure C funds shown in escalated dollars.
three phases. The first phase is locally funded.. Actual commitment is in 1988 dollars as shown in
The second phase is funded by local funds and Appendix A.
Measure C funds. The third phase is partially
funded with local funds. The City will be pursuing
other funding sources for the third phase. The first
phase includes the improvements between North
Main Street and Pioneer Avenue. In this section
there will be two through lanes in each direction.
Measure C funds will be used for construction.
7/I9/0I Draft Appendix D D 17
j �;S
.2001 DRAFT STRATEGIC PLAN-Fact Sleet CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
PACHECO
BOULEVARD
ARTHUR RD
WIDENING
PROPONENT:
CONTRA COSTA
COUNTY
PROJEC`
DE ` RIPTI ONJ
This p3ojeet consists of widening
Pacheco Boulevard from Blum
Road to Arthur Road in the
Martinez area. The road serves as - %
a local road and a parallel route to
Interstate 680. The closure of 680
Solano Way has left Pacheco`` .'J/,'
Boulevard as the main north/south
connector in the area other than
Interstate 680.
LEGEND.
Y� ®
PROJECT LIMITS
STATUS:
The project is in the design stage. '
Design is 30% complete and 's"t
o
Environmental work is 65%
complete. The County has
initiated discussions with the
railroad to coordinate the
relocation of the railroad
overcrossing and is looking at
accelerating the project development and
environmental process to coordinate this FUNDING SOURCES ($ X 1000):
relocation with the I-680 HOV project. Project �'
construction may be phased with the initial phase Measure C (Esc.S)' 3025.7
A .'`
being the railroad relocation. Project completion Tosco Transportation : '`fig IJIFund 4,000.0
Developer Fees/Loca� ` `� 1,500.0
is anticipated to be Fiscal Year 2003/04. '
10
TOTAL $ 8,525.7
Measure C funds shown in escalated dollars.
Actual commitment is in 1988 dollars as shown in
Appendix A.
D 18 Appendix D 7/19/01 Draft
5�3�
12001 DRAFT STRATEGIC PLAN-Fact Sheet CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION A UTHORITY
LwM 1••C,15t IP.R 1
�• I WinPOSC�NOM I 1
Z LEN HESTER ORSf I AR 1
CO— ITY PARR I N
•• ' LEN NESTER I I
Lt,m,c•r.[LI ! COWALI YPAW
COOSS"ALP MINA'(SPREE,rOR
HOOKSTONRD ._ ��_ — — tosra,c sractl- I I
HOOKSTON ROAD
T
f J `
I
'f •.^P.CJIb. .
�� PCV4B—._—
:•. .
.1 1V
lgq.9 OP[Ilu!!1
MAYHEW WAY ' a 1 1 I
O III I{
I � UP11W Ill
lti� I m IPRp?p5f0 IROa IIaPSr
IR�L ALIUn,[NI
` L• 4 � I
"oast
rn,. E .__..._
PPOPouo 4a•, `I
' lam rwu[HL ' 1
Y
BANCROFT ROAD/ STATUS:
HOOKSTON ROAD Projects design is 65% complete and construction is
INTERSECTION scheduled for Fall 2001.
IMPROVEMENTS
PROPONENT:
CONCORD.
PROJECT N
1217
DESCRIPTION: FUNDING SOURCES ($ X 1000):
The intersection improvements will consist of
installing a traffic signal, constructing curb, gutter, TFCA 150.0
sidewalk, and drainage improvements, and STP/CMAQ �V,, 307.0
reconstructing a portion of the pavement. In State (CMAQ Match) `{. 40.0
addition, Iron Horse Trail (class I trail) will be EBRPD '= `' � 60.0
extended between Mayhew Way and Hookston Measure C (Es9 lk 419.3
Road. This is a joint project between the Cities of
Concord and Pleasant Hill,with Concord being the TOTAL $ 976.3
lead agency. Measure C dollars will be used to fund
design and a portion of construction.
' Measure C funds shown in escalated dollars.
Actual commitment is in 1988 dollars as shown in
Appendix A.
7/19/01 Draft Appendix D D 19
5-37
-2001 DRAFT STRATEGIC PLAN-Fact Sheet CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
f F _
W
Q
. y
z.
Y a:
o
OAK BL
PARK �. , , � �" \, . INS DR
;VALLEY O
LEGEND
QQ , .S.I,N`AL . . . _
SUN VALLEY. 13
680 O ; INTER'C.O.NNEG MNS
OAK PARK BOULEVARD FUNDING SOURCES ($ X 1000):
SIGNAL INTERCONNECT
Measure C (Esc.$) ,-�^`� 106.1
PROPONENT:
TOTAL 'tK�;�t,��� # $106.1
PLEASANT HILL `ter
PROJECT NO.:.... a '`: ��
Measure C funds shown in escalated dollars.
1218 Actual commitment is in 1988 dollars as shown in
Appendix A.
DESCRIPTION:
This project interconnects signals for Oak Park
Boulevard between Pleasant Valley Drive,North
Main and Coggins Drive. A signal interconnect is
being installed for North Main with the Caltrans
Phase 5 work. This project would tie the signals
along Oak Park Boulevard into the network. Signals
along Oak Park Boulevard will be coordinated and
better managed.
STATUS:
Preliminary engineering will be initiated in 2001.
Construction not likely to start prior to FY 2004.
D 20 Append&D 07/19/01 Draft
S��8
2001 DRAFT STRATEGIC PLAN-Fact Sheet CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATIONAUTHORITY
IRON HORSE TRAIL
CROSSING AT
TREAT
BOULEVARD
PROPONENT:
CONTRA COSTA
COUNTY 0-1
,I n
II�I •
Ji li LAS JUNTAS WAY
ih
PROJEC
lid Pleasant Hill
121 �� BART station .
cc
DESC TION:
This projeorfsists of , ,
constructing a bicycle/pedestrian
bridge along the Iron Horse Trail '''
TREAT gLyp
alignment crossing Treat — -
Boulevard in the vicinity of Jones
Road. The bridge will provide a ;i.i; JONES
grade separation between traffic 1'; RD
on Treat Boulevard and traffic on lot; }
the Iron Horse Trail. Treat
Boulevard provides access to a LEGEND
BART station and to I-680. The 6690600 PROPOSED TR'A'IL
Iron Horse Trail is a Class I
bikeway facility that will
ultimately parallel the full length
of 1-680 in Contra Costa and
provide access to the BART
station.
STATUS:
The project is in the design stage and is included in FUNDING SOURCES ($ X 1000):
the Pleasant Hill BART Station Area Specific Plan. ,.0g=x;�
The project is supported by the adjacent Measure C (Esc-rS).' 'U ' 1,238.1
neighborhood groups,the Pleasant Hill BART
; •.�.;
Station Area Steering Committee, and the East Bay TOTAL $ 1,238.1
Regional Parks District which is the operator of the
Iron Horse Trail. With Measure C funds
programmed for FY 01/02,the County would ' Measure C funds shown in escalated dollars.
proceed with final design and environmental Actual commitment is in 1988 dollars as shown in
clearance activities. The County Redevelopment Appendix A.
Agency currently has a consultant finalizing a
community developed design. Final design
expected to start in Fall 2001.
7/19/01 Draft Appendix D D 21
��9
2001 DRAFT STRATEGIC PLAN-Fact Sheet CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATIONAUTHORITY
RICHMOND
PARKWAY
PROPONENT:
RICHMOND �
PROJECT O'. ', \ I 81v6d
.•.. , 5
3� San Pablo Bay M.b lNewWAM,,r,p,
DE RIP
The R m p , arkway Project is
a four to six-lane, limited access a
arterial approximately 7.3 miles in '"" "'° P.,,. •'
length,linking I-80 near Hilltop
Drive to Interstate 580 at two
3 ROW
interchanges (Castro Street and �.
Canal Boulevard)near the
n 1...
Richmond-San Rafael Bridge.
The project has a landscaped d1Ay /2
center median and controlled
\c'
O
0.cAm.d
access at 16 signalized
intersections and six interchanges. ACp ALO ArE
. A ■ T
1 CANAL .L1. Q8
STATUS:
LEGEND. c,".G M. D.1 Ne YYY BAST S.M..
-0.
f
W INTERCHANGE seo
Construction is complete, on all M SECTION COMPLETED
sections except Section 1 B O SECTION NUMBER
(South),which is under
construction, scheduled for
completion in 2001.
FUNDING SOURCES ($ X 1000):
TBD* 18,000.0 I Measure C funds shown in escalated dollars.
Local 28,378.0 Actual commitment is in 1988 dollars as shown in
Measure 1 W6 38,510.0 Appendix A.
SLTPPs 12,388.0
' ~. ,� * TBD=To Be Determined
Federal r.� W 2,300.0
Measure C (Esc:$)' 87,062.6
TOTAL $ 186,638.6
D22 Appendix D 7/19101 Draft
5- q0
.2001 DRAFT STRAFE GIC PLAN-Fact Sheet CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATIONAUTHORITY
�c I QO
QPc,J 91
0
Cq!At
Qa i 4 B R •.~ aI�
RD
ca
O
LEND
e 4 O
3�
v __— EXISTING
3
' PROPOSED
PROPOSED BART
— - x
ROUTE 4/WILLOW PASS - Reconstructed the Willow Pass Road interchange
GRADE LOWERING near community of Bay Point; and
- Provided sufficient median width between the
PROPONENT: eastbound and westbound lanes to accommodate
CONTRA COSTA the planned BART extension and two future HOV
lanes.
TRANSPORTATION
AUTHORITY-�_" . . .`�',
STATUS:
Construction completed in 1995,wetland monitoring
PROJECT NO ` will continue through FY
1401/1401 i�\
--
DESCRIPTION:
The Route 4/Willow Pass Grade Lowering project
was designed to increase capacity,reduce FUNDING SOURCES ($ X 1000):
congestion, improve safety, and accommodate the
extension of BART to eastern Contra Costa State 1,900.0
County. The project has accomplished the Federal R, ', 3,200.0
following: Measure C 6! 65,401.7
- Widened Route 4 from four through lanes with TOTAL $ 70,501.7
auxiliary climbing lanes to six through lanes;
Measure C funds shown in escalated dollars.
- Provided auxiliary climbing lanes over Willow Actual commitment is in 1988 dollars as shown in
Pass summit; Appendix A.
- Reduced the Willow Pass grade from 7.0
percent to 3.5 percent; 2 $27,088,200 of this amount represents the Measure C
BART funding contribution to this project.
Funded from both Route 4 East and BART categories.
7/19/01 Draft Appendix D D 23
S- W
2001 DRAFT STRATEGIC PLAN-Fact Sheet CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATIONAUTHORITY
ova I
m .``L
u
o _
4
BART STATION---""
0
- � \\
F —�
��.�
(— T
N J lgr
� r
LEGEND
---- EXISTRG
q ® PROPOSED
PROPOSED BART
WE w
SR 4 (E) WIDENING: BAILEY STATUS:
ROAD INTERCHANGE Construction completed in March 1996.
PROPONENT: FUNDING SOURCES ($ X 1000):
CONTRA COSTA
TRANSPORTATIONi��Ja\� Measure C (Esc.$)' ' 76,929
v�
�r' � V.:•
AUTHORITY /� TOTAL ��r `�� $ 75,929
PROJECT ' Measure C funds shown in escalated dollars.
Actual commitment is in 1988 dollars as shown in
1402/140 r Appendix A.
a $32,901,900 of this amount represents the Measure C
DESCRIPTION: BART funding contribution to this project.
This project reconstructs the Route 4/Bailey Road Funded from both Route 4 East and BART categories.
interchange to accommodate the expansion of
Route 4 to eight lanes and to allow for the
construction of the new West Pittsburg/Bay Point
BART station. West of the interchange,Route 4 is
widened from four lanes to six lanes with
sufficient width between the eastbound and
westbound lanes to accommodate two future HOV
lanes and the BART extension to east Contra Costa
County. East of the Bailey Road interchange,
Route 4 conforms to the existing four lane facility.
D 24 Appendix D 7/19/01 Draft
?001 DRAFT STRATEGIC PLAN-Fact Sheet CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATIONAUTHORITY
'r
MCI p 6e.i n
sl U PLIajit-
- Conform Exist
4 Lane Freeway----.
4_ Restripe Median Shoulder _
r d HOV to AdLanes
ro Qa
Widen to an 6-Lane Section__ __ Widen to
. .
o�;!�` I , [Including N6v Lanes) 6-Lane Sectionol
BART Station LEGEND
!7[•1\ u� __--_.:= EXISTING
!�PROPOSED
' -- s•.
SR 4 (E) WIDENING: BAILEY
ROAD TO RAILROAD STATUS:
AVENUE The CEQA/NEPA environmental clearance was
obtained in May 1998.
PROPONENT: Final design was completed in January 1999 and
CONTRA COSTA construction started in June 1999. Construction is
TRANSPORTATION--- Scheduled to be complete in September 2001.
AUTHORITY,,.—='
PROJECT,NO: 1 _ -
1403/1403B./1403C FUNDING SOURCES ($ X 1000):
DESCRIPTION: Federal a,tK
(Esr- !1-1 1,224.0
Measure C ,) -"i? 27,956.0
This project will widen the existing highway, from
two to four lanes in each direction (including an
TOTAL ` �-� � S 29,180.0
HOV lane), between Bailey Road and Railroad
Avenue,restripe the existing median shoulder I Measure C funds shown in escalated dollars.
between Port Chicago Highway and Bailey Road to Actual commitment is in 1988 dollars as shown in
provide an HOV lane in each direction, and Appendix A.
provide a wide median to allow for the future 2 11,693,200 of this amount represents the Measure C
extension of BART further into EAST County. BART funding contribution to this project.
Funded from Route 4 East, BART and Commuterway
categories.
7/19/01 Draft Appendix D D 25
s-y�
•2001 DRAFT STRATEGIC PLAN-Fact Sheet CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATIONAUTHORITY
Ma P Be—,n9 U P (,I-+fC .
b \
,I II ii II II II I � 1
WII 11 II I, 11 II I I I I I I
'<I I I I I I I j l I I i t i t I -- id II i' jj I� II ii
II II II II I II
I.I II II I II> <I II 1 LJ Jl_J II II
r �� r�r�--�J�= r����-�L------
<I
it ISI I
I I I I I 1 I I I to i i/'1 I LJ LMACANTHIAI AYEJ LJI I I I, I I It
II
J L-J uro fl.J L-J u �A_"�J� L ': �l Ii----
• 2001 DRAFT STRATEGIC PLAN-Fact Sheet CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION A UTHORITY
Alternate 1 Alternate 2
i
w
o �
CALiFORR111 _ CACIFORRIA_
o-°
nn o p 5 Be,i n
O J
Upcl a-i-ed J
SR 4 (E) WIDENING:
LOVERIDGE ROAD TO STATUS:
SOMERSVILLE ROAD The Project Study Report was completed in February
2000. Environmental Clearance has just begun and is
anticipated to be complete by in June of 2002. The
PROPONENT: Final Design documents are scheduled to be
CONTRA COSTA completed by December 2003 and Construction is
anticipated to start in February 2004 and to be
TRANSPORTATION
completed in June 2006.
AUTHORITY
PROJECT NO:
140611406B FUNDING SOURCES ($ X 1000):
DESCRIPTION: Measure C (Esc.$)I.' 27,574.9
This project will construct eight through lanes (three STIP (2002 Proposed) 27,000.0
�
mixed flow and one HOV lane in each direction) on ITIP 3,000.0TCR 14,000.0
State Route 4 (SR 4) from just west of the Loveridge
Road vicinity to the interchange of Century TOTAL � $ 71,574.9
Boulevard Undercrossing and then transition to a
six-lane facility(three mixed flow lanes)to just west
of the Somersville Road bridge. The project I Funded from the Route 4 East and BART categories.
includes reconstruction of the Loveridge Road ,
Measure C funds shown in escalated dollars.
interchange as well as a median wide enough to Actual commitment is in 1988 dollars as shown in
accommodate a future BART extension. Appendix A
7119101 Draft Appendix D D27
yS
•2001 DRAFT STRATEGICPL4N-Fact Sheet CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION AUTTIORITY
Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3
I—PG&E Transmission
Tower line
Unoed (Phsa 1*%IPll 3 Ee) 'eyes
1 1W elbound":;2
usaa propwad routs
..
a,it* �\\ F A'bary (oY1I RH IIdIWy -
5Y //� Graphite
(.'[T)'HALL* -
Sycamore (Curve comeollen' 0„\aa
a
opo
Routs 4
Full movement b
st-prede lnttneetlon _ 1 9 ��.a
a, �-------•-�---- Franklin hn,nn \ y
Galrcoune I t111111
n
Potantlal~bour d Potentl.l s1eM dUbnn
eeeaes wm�tlon
no, Eatbound tome
y LA pda,�ed w..sat.nnpmpnwey
r.
1 '
ROUTE 4 FREEWAY GAP
CLOSURE PROJECT - STATUS:
PHASE 1 Construction started on Phase I in July 1999 and is
expected to be completed by Fall 2002.
PROPONENT:
CONTRA COSTA
TRANSPORTATIO x1--�'�
AUTHORITY .;..:•
PROJEC
1501
` FUNDING SOURCES ($ X 1000):
DESCRIPTI
Federal 7,500.0
This project is Phase I of a two-phase plan to State 25,167.0
convert Route 4 into a full freeway between Measure C (Es 51,200.0
Cummings Skyway and I-80. Phase I will provide
a four-lane, fully divided facility by constructing TOTAL $ 83,867.0
two new westbound lanes north of the existing
highway,then converting the existing highway in 1 Measure C funds shown in escalated dollars.
that same area into two eastbound lanes. Actual commitment is in 1988 dollars as shown in
Appendix A.
' In addition, West County Subregional Transportation
Mitigation Program (STMP) funds will be available to
supplement Measure C funds ($4,029.0 is anticipated).
D 28 Appendix D 7/19101 Draft
'=' z_j
2001 DRAFT STRATEGIC PLAN-Fact Sheet CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATIONAUTHORITY
I
Rodeo ow
80 S
J
3
de
Separation
AVE
iN t
�G
Bq r
y
R
A T
LEGEA
Exisling
Proposed
HereIle8
ROUTE4/WILLOW AVENUE STATUS:
OVERCROSSING Construction completed in 1996.
PROPONENT:
HERCULES
PROJECT-96. JAX
1503
DESCRIPTION:
This project is a grade separation (safety)project that FUNDING SOURCES
constricts a partial interchange at the intersection of ($ X 1000):
Willow Avenue and Route 4. It includes adding Local 411.2
westbound Route 4 on/off-ramps at Willow Avenue Measure C (Esc.$)' 7,318.6
and an eastbound Route 4 acceleration lane from
Sycamore Avenue. Also included in this.project is a TOTAL $ 7,729.8
new eastbound Route 4 on-ramp at Bayberry
Avenue, to be paid for with local funds. This project
provides safety and circulation improvements which ' Measure C funds shown in escalated dollars.
will help reduce the accident rate and congestion in Actual commitment is .in 1988 dollars as shown in
the vicinity of this intersection. Appendix A.
7/19/01 Draft Appendix D D29
5--q 7
2001 DRAFT STRATEGIC PLAN-Fact Sheet . CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
MORAGA ROAD ,
SAFETY
IMPROVEMENTS
PROPONENTS: —
LAFAYETTE
j
e. IABLO
BLVD.
PROJECT.NO: MT
1600
DESCRIPTION: �':MORAGA LL .BLVD.
Moraga Road Safety Improve- o
ments is a series of small projects
which will focus on specific safety
improvements on Moraga Road in c
Lafayette. These improvements BRooK ST o
will include: • 'SCHOOL
a. Crosswalk warning system at n� ST
Hamlin Road/Tanglewood
b. Removal of 3 mid-block
crosswalks
c. Removal of bike lane
designation from Moraga sT
Road 4f.4
A?
Designation of new bike Rt'`s.
C? RD
routes on School Street, First
Street, Brook Street J ,0 /
e. Adding a 5-section signal
head at the intersection with a
Mt.Diablo Boulevard % HAMUIV
f. A "safe route to school"plan RD
STATUS: FUNDING SOURCES ($ X 1000):
(b), (c), (d),and(e) are completed. (a) and (f)will
be completed in 2003 concurrently with project Measure C (Esc.$)' 11.4
1612.
TOTAL '� $ 11.4
Measure C funds shown in escalated dollars.
Actual commitment is in 1988 dollars as shown in
Appendix A.
D 30 Appendix D 7/19/01 Draft
2001 DRAFT STRATEGIC PLAN-Fact Sheet CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATIONAUTHORITY
M.,
Carpo
ot
S4,V 7,4
Mq R/;q � I
AVL
in
a
ORINDA yyAy � I
a
PABLO a
ti _ _ _ --_ -_- -_-
----- - it
- a
M
- •t
ja
'a• ffi
_ .., sct - - .- SO*17A
s+r
CAMINO PABLO CARPOOL STATUS:
LOTS & SANTA MARIA Construction has been completed on the park and ride
INTERSECTION lot near the Santa Maria Church, the additional turn
lane on northbound Camino Pablo to westbound
IMPROVEMENTS SR24, and the traffic signal coordination.
PROPONENT: FUNDING SOURCES ($ X 1000):
ORINDA
-060 Measure C (Esc.S), 321.8
PROJECT N8; 1
1
602 ��,-� TOTAL $ 321.8
DESCRIPTION: ' Measure C funds shown in escalated dollars.
Actual commitment is in 1988 dollars as shown in
This item includes the following improvements: A Appendix A.
park and ride lot near the Santa Maria Church, the
addition of a second lane on northbound Camino
Pablo to westbound SR24, signal coordination along
Camino Pablo between Santa Maria Way and
Camino Encinas.
7/19101 Draft Appendix D D 31
5--q9
•2001 DRAFT STRATECICPLAN-Fact Sheet CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATIONAUTHORITY
MORAGA WAY AT
GLORIETTA
BOULEVARD AND
CAMINO ENCINAS
24
PROPONENTS:
ORINDA
C9��NO
r
PROJE p'a�
o
1607 1
DESCRIPTION: °
n
This project includes: additional N�
of a right-turn lane to both
northbound Moraga Way and
westbound Glorietta Boulevard,
moving the northbound Moraga .LEGEND 9�
s
Way bus stop to the north side of 9 PROJECT LOCATION 990
the intersection, addition of a 1607 CCTA PROJECT NUMBER �=
separate pedestrian walkway
along the north side of Glorietta BROOKSID
Boulevard between Glorietta
Court and the relocated bus stop, /
1607
a pedestrian crosswalk across
Moraga Way to access the
northbound and southbound ,
Moraga Way through this
intersection.
T
Improvements at the Camino
Encinas intersection better
channelize traffic through the
Brookwood intersection. These improvements are in
both the southbound and northbound directions. In FUNDING SOURCES ($ X 1000):
the southbound direction, the merge lane length
(from two lanes to one)extends to Overhill Road. In
the northbound direction,
the second northbound Measure C (Esc.$)' 2,113.8
lane begins near Overhill rather than its current TOTAL $ 2,113.8
beginning shortly before the Camino Encinas
intersection.
' Measure C funds shown in escalated dollars.
Actual commitment is in 1988 dollars as shown in
STATUS: Appendix A.
Construction completed in Spring 2001.
D 32 Appendix D 7/19/01 Draft
S- Sr)
2001 DRAFT STRATEGICPLAN-Fact Sheet CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATIONAUTHORITY
MORAGA WAY
SAFETY
IMPROVEMENTS
PROPONENTS: I
O RI N DA RHEEM
� l
,o e
PROJECT NO: ,
1608
DESCRIPTION: °
This project proposes to construct
some of the recommended
features from the Moraga Way q ��
Pedestrian Safety Study (1997) as o Z o
,�
well as initiate studies necessary o,o
\`!1.
to analyze traffic flow at 3 oR o
intersections along Moraga Way �Ih
between Ivy Drive and Glorietta
Boulevard. Pv
3
STATUS: �y9`
The Moraga Way Pedestrian
Safety Study has been completed LEG_ END o�
and improvements proposed in
this study such as separate °°°°° PROJECT LOCATION
walkways and crosswalks are 1608 CCTA PROJECT NUMBER
anticipated to move forward in
2001.
FUNDING SOURCES ($ X 1000):
Measure C (Esc.$)' 74.1
TOTAL $ 74.1
Measure C funds shown in escalated dollars.
Actual commitment is in 1988 dollars as shown in
Appendix A.
7/19101 Draft Appendix D D 33
S- 5
2001 DRAFT STRATEGIC PLAN-Fact Sheet CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION A UTHORITY
Moraga Way/Ivy
Drive Roadway
Improvement &
Signalization
Project.
RHEEM
PROPONENTS: I
�a
ORINDA
�Q
PROJECT hhQQ
1609
L "'°Rq�.
DESCRIPTION: 9
x �
The proposed project will modify q.04
Q `.
the intersection to provide a free r o
right turn lane from Southbound o 0 0
3
Moraga Way to Westbound Ivy
Drive. The existing signal will be
replaced and sidewalks will be
widened to meet ADA standards.
r�
STATUS:
Project is in the design stage and 9A
expected to be completed in Fall
2001. LEGEND..
0
�.� PROJECT LOCATION
`1609
(1609.) CCTA PROJECT NUMBER
R � Y
FUNDING SOURCES ($X1000):
Measure C (Esc.$)' 128_1
TOTAL $ 128.1
' Measure C funds shown in escalated dollars.
Actual commitment is in 1988 dollars as shown in
Appendix A.
D 34 Appendix D 7/19/01 Draft
S—5121
2001 DRAFT STRATEGIC PLAN-Fact Sheet CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATIONAUTHORITY
GATEWAY EB ON-RAMP
MERGER WITH AUXILARY LANE
24
1
MATCH ORINDA OFF-RAMP
�;�� \\ ����� •'j r^� �`7 WIDENING PROJECT (Pnase 1)
END BIKE PATH
N
,'c`� — \�✓ J LEGEND
EXISTING
�� —�--��-- BART TRACKS
GATEWAY BLVD.
BEGIN BIKE PATH PROPOSED AUXILARY LANE
•••••••••••• PROPOSED BIKE PATH
Tx
SR 24 AUXILIARY LANE Brookwood off-ramp. Phase II was Project 1702
SR-24/Brookwood Off-Ramp. The Orinda City
PROPONENT: Council does not support ramp improvements. The
CONTRA COSTA Orinda City Council has requested that Caltrans
review the auxiliary lane as a stand alone project
TRANSPORTATION .
without improvements at the ramp.
AUTHORITY
STATUS:
PROJECT NO: Construction is unfunded but future SHOPP cycles
1610
will be pursued.
DESCRIPTION:
This project proposed to provide an auxiliary lane FUNDING SOURCES ($ X 1000):
between Gateway Boulevard Interchange and the
Orinda Interchange on eastbound Route 24. This Measure C (Esc.$)' 429.3
will largely be accomplished by restriping of
existing lanes and shoulders. The project would TOTAL $ 429.3
also relocate the existing bike lane from Route 24 IDS
to a new bike path south of Route 24, ending on
Brookwood. The construction cost is estimated at ' Measure C funds shown in escalated dollars.
$5.1 million. Actual commitment is in 1988 dollars as shown in The Strategic Plan includes funding Appendix A.
only to continue project development. No
construction funds are programmed.
This project would be the third in a sequence of
interrelated projects to improve operations at the
7/19/01 Draft Appendix D D 35
- S.�
2001 DRAFT STRATEGIC PLAN-Fact Sheet CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
�F
� I
of o a
BLVD.
.... �`
� Q.�PLAZ,.. GOLDEN GATE
G�
�l
LEGEND
�0000 PROJECT LOCATION
1611 CCTA PROJECT NUMBER
„--,.. •` � - - --_ - as
MT. DIABLO BOULEVARD
CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS STATUS:
Construction completed in early summer 2001.
PROPONENT:
LAFAYETTE
PROJECT NO:
1611
DESCRIPTION:
This project adds a third eastbound through lane to
Mt. Diablo Boulevard between Oak Hill Road and
Moraga Road. At the intersection of Mt. Diablo FUNDING SOURCES ($ X 1000):
Boulevard and Moraga Road, a third southbound
lane was added. To the south, Plaza Way and on- Measure C (Esc.$)' 4,080.3
street parking was eliminated to remove conflicting
turn movements from this side street. To the east, TOTAL � $ 4,080.3
Golden Gate Way was realigned to restore
circulation and access and on-street parking to
businesses on Plaza Way. The project includd
some landscape work that mitigated loss of ' Measure C funds shown in escalated dollars.
existing landscaped medians and park area. Plaza Actual commitment is in 1988 dollars as shown in
park was rebuilt using local funds. Appendix A..
D 36 Append&D 07/19/01 Draft
J- Z.-q
,2001 DRAFT STRATEGICPLAN-Fact Sheet CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATIONAUTHORITY
MORAGA ROAD
CORRIDOR
IMPROVEMENTS I
PROPONENTS:
LAFAYETTE, _.:- - -
ti
fir..• o
PROJECT N
1612
,� [.13LL14V
MT p1AgL0
®
�E7,—
DESCRIPTION: cc
This project will be completed in four
phases: / Q MORAGA BLVD'
Phase I: Brook Street will be closed es
with temporary measures at the X
intersection with Moraga Road. The 2
existing signal and crosswalks at this
intersection will be eliminated. This is BROOK :ST
intended to provide immediate traffic • SCHOOL
congestion alleviation to Moraga Road. ST
Two months after the closure is in
effect,traffic data will be collected to
confirm the anticipated benefit.
Phase II: A traffic signal will be
installed at the intersection of Moraga
Road and Moraga Boulevard. The ST
signals along the corridor from Mt. l MgRr.
Diablo Boulevard south will be LEGEND
coordinated with an interconnect so**a PROJECT LOCATION
system.
Phase III: Right-of-way will be �16CCTA PROJECT NtHNBER
acquired to accommodate the
realignment of Brook Street with
School Street. A pedestrian walkway
will be constructed along Moraga Road
from Old Jones Hill Road to Rosedale
as a safety improvement and to mitigate FUNDING SOURCES
the removal of existing bike lanes on ( X 1000):
Moraga Road. Measure C (Esc.$)' 1,533.1
Phase IV: Construct realignment of Brook Street with
School Street. TOTAL $ 1,533.1
Measure C funds shown in escalated dollars.
Actual commitment is in 1988 dollars as shown in
Appendix A.
STATUS:
Phase I: Complete
Phase 11: Under construction as part of project 1611.
Phase III&N: To be constructed in 2003.
7/19101 Draft Appendix D D37
2001 DRAFT STRATEGIC PLAN-Fact Sheet CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATIONAUTHORITY
0 L a f a p e t t Isis �y
la ( 24 DIABLO
o 3
I 0 r I @ d
L-- •! } a 'M�qY" s Bre
It/rjelrr,9eNoir s
�y
C D e S96
Fintz
2414
n n or 14
nHEE
4r
^rF awl 1613
'n 7 E4
� al�g Ii
LEGEND "7
M o r a g a
O PROJECT LOCATION " 1r
1G13 CCTA PROJECT NUMBER � —
ti Cit,o!L.lov.tt.
' lbwn of M...,.
4"
c� r
MARtm9
y /J
• a
LAFAYETTE CARPOOL LOTS FUNDING SOURCES ($ x 1000):
PROPONENT: Measure C (Esc.$)',,. 275.6
LAFAYETTE -
TOTAL f -�" $ 275.6
PROJECT NO:
1613 Measure C funds shown in escalated dollars.
Actual commitment is in 1988 dollars as shown in
Appendix A.
DESCRIPTION:
This project proposes to construct two carpool lots.
One lot would be constructed in the southerly portion
of St.Mary's Road near the Lafayette Community
Park. The second lot would be constructed along
Deer Hill Road.
STATUS:
The St. Mary's Road carpool lot is constructed. The
Deer Hill Road project will be implemented at a later
time pending completion of a preliminary study,
neighborhood discussions,and final plans.
Construction of Deer Hill Road is not likely to
proceed prior to FY 2004.
D 38 Append&D 07/19101 Draft
2001 DRAFT STRATEGIC PLAN-Fact Sheet CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATIONAUTHORITY
MORAGA PARK
AND RIDE LOT
PROPONENTS:
MORAGA
o
o
CC
u Iti
PROJECT N •�
1620 cc
\ `
DESCRIPTION:
This project proposes to construct '�0
a park and ride facility off Moraga co cq
Way near School Street. The ayr9
project will provide a place for � PSP
carpools to park and will provide .
caye wqy CoQ
shelter for those waiting for rides
in inclement weather. This 4D
location is near an established �o°y
casual carpool pickup point, with `' �o
BART and CCCTA access for the
return trip. Currently the number
of carpoolers is limited by the
amount of available parking. This
project will allow additional
commuters the opportunity to
participate in this carpooling ` \
activity.
STATUS:
r
FUNDING SOURCES
($ X 1000):
Measure C (Esc.$)'•', ?
TOTAL $ ?
' Measure C funds shown in escalated dollars.
Actual commitment is in 1988 dollars as shown in
Appendix A.
7 Lamorinda Regional fees are anticipated to supplement
Measure C funds potentially up to $268,000.
7/19101 Draft Appendix D D 39 _
5
2001 DRAFT STRATEGICPLAN-Fact Sheet CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATIONAUTHORITY
L a t a y
24 oua�a 7°
' I 1` i P?Ey •�r � �?
0 I
d
24
o °
1621'
4'
�✓ �� Lnfe oleo
RHEEN``
�P
} ti 10
� ey �'Z• 1621%1721'
LEGEND
0 8 g g it
l0000 PROJECT ATI N
CCTA PROJECT NUMBER o
o
x ��a(Le(e otl
' s
o n of No:nYe
e
Hq
Oq
MARY'S /
� 5i I`•SI YffJ;l..;
t � '••.Ccll/jl,•••
z
ST. MARY'S ROAD - PHASE II FUNDING SOURCES ($ X1000):
PROPONENT: Measure C (Esc.$)' , 799.3
LAFAYETTE
TOTAL $ 799.3
PROJECT NO:
' Measure C funds shown in escalated dollars.
1621 ` ' Actual commitment is in 1988 dollars as shown in
Appendix A.
DESCRIPTION:
This project completed unfinished improvements
planned in the original Measure C project(1711).
The project stabilized roadway embankments at
various locations, and re-configure two intersections
that provided turn lanes and correct adverse
horizontal alignments. Other improvements
included shoulder work,minor drainage, and a
walkway gap closure on Glenside Drive between
Reliez Station Road and the Lafayette Moraga
Regional Trail.
STATUS:
Construction is complete.
D 40 Appendix D 07/19/01 Draft
2001 DRAFT STRATEGICPLAN-Fact Sheet CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATIONAUTHORITY
MORAGA ROAD:
STRUCTURAL &
0'CONNOR.
SAFETY STUDY
PROPONENTS:
LAFAYETTE I MgRYS
I s
PROJECT NO: \.
� HA.
'1622 MRD
��N
162.2
DESCRIPTION:
MORAGA
This project involves structural. RI •
hIF,OCK-.RD �i�••��•••••��v•�••..
and safety improvements along ao
the corridor. Items of work wF�4
include:Access improvements at •'
intersections,shoulder work,
potential slope stabilization, •'
pavement rehabilitation,removal LEGEND
of safety hazards, and related .•
improvements.
Siff* •v�•• PROJECT LOCATION
....•
• 1622 OCTA PROJECT NUMBER
• o
STATUS: :MADRONE o
•
DR
Improvements from the Lafayette/
Moraga town limits to Rimrock
Road are completed. The •��•+..
remainder of the work is
scheduled for 2003 in conjunction NADP
with work on project 1612. GRP
VAP
i
�F
FUNDING SOURCES ($ X 1000):
Measure C (Esc.$)' 226.2
TOTAL $ 226.2
' Measure C fun shown in escalated dollars.
Actual commitment is in 1988 dollars as shown in
Appendix A..
7/19101 Draft Appendix D D 41
r
2001 DRAFT STRATEGICPLAN-Fact Sheet CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATIONAUTHORITY
ST. MARY'S ROAD
"EI"
IMPROVEMENTS
9EECHW000 DR \�.. STATION AD PLEASANT
E.Pavemuro
ent Overlay e
of Intersection. Olt
PROPONENT:
LAFAYETTE /
PROJECT NO: . / -o.moms sl pews and
1711 �e�Distance.
L Realign Curve and Stabilize Slope y 4P
DESCRIPTION: at Varian Locations _
North Leg to
This project constructed SOUd*K nd
circulation, drainage, and safety ; Left
Right T ,rns
and Northbound
improvements in nine phases QRel*we Bus stop, i
Replace storm Drains
along the length of the existing and Provide Tern Lana.— $
two-lane roadway corridor. The ! '"B.Leh Turn Lama
corridor includes the following F ff \
LEG E4D A Improve Drainsoe and
roadways: 1) Olympic Boulevard cautnxt walkway.
G
from Pleasant Hill Road to Reliez AL—s EXISTINXISTIN ED
F.StabilimRadws creek Be*,
Station Road, 2) Reliez Station
' •.........^°.^^. EXISTING TRAIL � Restigi Roadway and
Road from Olympic Boulevard to ��' COfa""ct Walkway.
Glenside Drive; 3) Glenside Drive
from Reliez Station Road to St. :___—K Realign Road and Stabilize
Mary's Road; and 4) St. Mary's \ Bank
Road from Glenside Drive south
to the city limits.
Major widening and realignment g�
was not required. Items of work
r �
limit
city
included left-turn lanes, access /
limit Ilne.
improvements at intersections,
shoulder work, drainage,
a.
walkways, and slope stabilization. -
STATUS: FUNDING SOURCES ($ X 1000):
Construction completed in 1995. Ao
Measure C (Esc.$)1, 3,793.3
TOTAL $ 3,793.3
Measure C funds shown in escalated dollars.
Actual commitment is in 1988 dollars as shown in
Appendix A.
D 42 Appendix D 7/19/01 Draft
J— �n�
2001 DRAFT STRATEGIC PLAN-Fact Slieet CONTRA COSTA TRANSPOR TA TION A UTHORITY
SAN RAMON
VALLEY
BOULEVARD
IMPROVEMENTS
PROPONENT:
DANVILLE f
`��ti��FEZ WAY
i
PROJECT NO:
1715 '�. N9 ization
DESCRIPTION:
This project realigns and modifies VL
the signals at the intersection of
San Ramon Valley Boulevard,
o sot+
Railroad Avenue,Hartz Avenue,
and Hartz.Way;provides
signalization at the intersection of
Hartz Way and Front Street; and -
widens San Ramon Valleyn�s ave cr
Boulevard from Sonora Avenue LEGEND
to Town and Country Drive. The
project also includes raised ---- EXISTING ROADWAY
median turn pockets, pavement. 11�011 ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS
replacement and overlays, _
restriping,and frontage
improvements. The overall
project provides four continuous
lanes from the San Ramon Valley
Boulevard/Railroad Avenue/Hartz
Avenue/Hartz Way intersection
south to Podva Road.
FUNDING SOURCES ($ X 1000):
STATUS:
Construction completed in 1996. Local 175.0
Measure C (Esc.$)' 1,884.2
TOTAL $ 2,059.2
Measure C funds shown in escalated dollars.
Actual commitment is in 1988 dollars as shown in
Appendix A.
7119/01 Draft Appendix D D 43
'2001 DRAFT STRATEGIC PLAN-Fact Sheet CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATIONAUTHORITY
SAN RAMON I
VALLEY
rte: ,'1i `��
BOULEVARD J
IMPROVEMENTS -
P �\ .r�
HART2 AVE'
PHASE 2 '
Op94p0 9
Sp�pR4
PROPONENT: AVE
DANVILLE
ESTATES OR OAK C .i
ti
PROJECT NO:
1716 N � .
�\DESCRIPTION: PROJECT — .6801,
Thisro ect would install new v ;I' '•
P J
stop bar loops on San Ramon i
RE
Valley Boulevard (northbound SYCAMO9
and southbound) at Sycamore =Rp
=: =,
Valley Road and the entrace to
the Livery&Mercantile. The
project will also replace four(4) pDA'R CT '4F
signal poles, add emergency o
vehicle preemption at both RD
intersections, upgrade controller ',';`,,
software and illuminate street
name signs. Measure C funds o
will fully fiend construction. OC 0..p�
NO �9
4
STATUS: FUNDING SOURCES ($ X 1000):
65%design in complete. Construction in anticipated
in FY 2002. Measure C (Esc.$)' 214.2
TOTAL $ 214.2
Measure C funds shown in escalated dollars.
Actual commitment is in 1988 dollars as shown in
Appendix A.
D 44 Appendix D 7/19/01 Draft
2001 DRAFT STRATEGIC PLAN-Fact Sheet CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATIONAUTHORI-TY
P
p
� I 1
ROAD
AN N =__----_
CROW CANYON ROAD This project is funded from a combination of funds
IMPROVEMENTS including TEA-21 funds, STIP monies, local funds
and City development fees. Measure C funds will be
mainly used.for construction of climbing lane and
PROPONENT: turn lanes.
CITY OF SAN RAMON
STATUS:
PROJECT NO: " Construction of all the above work is complete.
1718
DESCRIPTION: FUNDING SOURCES
This project provided the following improvements ($ X 1000):
for Crow Canyon Road from west of Bollinger
Canyon Road to the San Ramon City limit: TEA-21 485.0
STIP 100.0
1. Mitigation of chronic exisiting peak period Local 119.0
E 207.0 C
traffic congestion by providing an extended Measure (
westbound climbing lane and eastbound turn
channelization. TOTAL $ 911.0
2. An asphalt concrete overlay on Crow
Canyon Road from Bollinger Canyon Road
west to the City of San Ramon city limit. Measure C funds shown in escalated dollars.
3. Construction of a raised median west of Actual commitment is in 1988 dollars as shown in
Bollinger Canyon Road. Appendix A.
4. Traffic signal modification.
5. Street lighting.
6. Minor street widening that provides an
additional eastbound through right tum lane at
the intersection.
7/19101 Draft Append&D D 45
2001 DRAFT STRATEGIC PLAN-Fact Sheet CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATIONAUTHORITY
SAN RAMON
VALLEY
BOULEVARD /
I
DR
WIDENING - �`�► �� '��
PHASE I
PROPONENT: Phase't 1�
SAN RA M O N (4 Lanes)
o
11 I,
New Signal
PROJECT NO: m �1
.1720 1 p&VALLEY� C!*D
---= EXISTING
DESCRIPTION: Phase 2(a Lanes) 7 i� � PROPOSED
Phase 1(2 Lanes
This project widens San Ramon With Left Tern Lane) ® NEW SIGNAL
Valley Boulevard between Alcosta
9
Boulevard and Montevideo Drive. O �1l
The project is being developed in
two phases. The first phase included N X11
widening of the roadway from two to
four lanes at the extreme north and
south ends of the project, and Phase 1(4 Lanes)
realignment of the roadway and it 1 Realignment
utility undergrounding at the south \
end. Other work includes interim Acosu �JL1�Z���—___City of Saa Ramon
relocation of overhead utilities along -- Alameda County
the middle section of the project,
installation of a traffic signal at Pine
Valley Road;and construction of
medians,turn pockets and
landscaping throughout. Adjacent
developers constructed concurrent
frontage improvements and collector
street intersections at the north end of
the project. The second phase will include the balance of
the widening from two to four lanes along the middle begin north of Pine Valley Road in the spring of 1998.
section of the project and undergrounding of the
remaining overhead utilities. FUNDING SOURCES ($ X 1000):
The first phase was funded entirely from the Measure C Local 1,813.0
Southwest Arterial category with matching State-Local
Measure C (Esc.$)' 7,037:3
Transportation Partnership Program funds. The second '�
phase will be partially constructed by developers,and by .
City development fees with a minor contribution from TOTAL, $ 8,850.3
Measure C funds controlled by the City.
' Measure C funds shown in escalated dollars.
STATUS: Actual commitment is in 1988 dollars as shown in
Constriction of the first phase was completed in the Appendix A.
summer of 1997. The second phase is currently under
design. Partial developer constriction is expected to
D 46 Appendix D 7/19101 Draft
i
— e.,2{
2001 DRAFT STRATEGIC PLAN-Fact Sheet CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
CAMINO PABLO %,
(SAN PABLO DAM ,T ;,� LEGEND
CORRIDOR) ° ___
_= EXISTING ALIGNMENT
NEW ALIGNMENT
PROPONENT: 0 ® NEW SIGNAL
ORINDA o ~
PROJECT
��„ li.
1801 k , -9 \
DESCRIPTION: _^aR l
Camino Pablo is the southeast `os
portion of the San Pablo Dam
Corridor, and is used as a link
between the Richmond area and °"
central Contra Costa County. It I \\\ �l \ New Signals
is often used to bypass traffic0
congestion on the I-80 corridor
and has high peak-hour volumes New Intersection
creating local congestion in the
City of Orinda.
Frontage Road—�I\�
The Camino Pablo project +�\ _
improves and realigns Camino
Pablo in Orinda as a two-lane
roadway and provides left turn i
i
lanes and separated pedestrian
and bicycle paths.
STATUS:
Construction completed in 1996. s
FUNDING SOURCES ($ X 1000):
Measure C (Esc.S)' 5,057.9
TOTAL $ 5,057.9
Measure C funds shown in escalated dollars.
Actual commitment is in 1988 dollars as shown in
Appendix A.
7/19/01 Draft Appendix D D47
j '�
2001 DRAFT STRATEGIC PLAN-Fact Sheet CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATIONAUTHORITY
BART Tracka�
,......., ,1 4 In,u....,�.m..��.,.` u,e i. u� 'r,,,n�r '*. w PASS 71
O• ,} ..+„ use• ,„'_��' OAO
�Eq, i i••a North Concord/ 4.�s; v0 Martinez \ ¢
BART Station \ c +�'6••.
C'r�
.i.. a•I O ,c•�
ai
•; � ,Y� )MAGAZINE\
OW PASA Be aint
U. S. NAVAL
BART9tetion
/ way
R
N RO C\
$• � Coocar
- BART St 'on
i
LEGEND
BART TRACKS
f
---- CITY LIMIT BOUNDARY
;r
7 WATER WAY(Canal/Creek)
Sign K-A—M 11101
BART EXTENSION TO
PITTSBURG/BAY POINT STATUS:
Extension is now operational. Revenue service for
the North Concord/Martinez station began in
PROPONENT: December 1995 and revenue service for the new
BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT station at Bay Point began in December 1996.
DISTRICT (BART)
PROJECT NO: FUNDING SOURCES ($ X 1000):
2101 €
. BART Funds 39,800.0
1h.� r1
DESCRIPTIOItI: San Mateo 86,800.0
Construction of the 7.8-mile extension from State 103,000.0
Concord to Bay Point includes BART stations at Prop. 108 35,000.0
North Concord and Bay Point. Prop. 116 �?�� 35,300.0
Bridge Toll Fun IDS49,800.0
The project extends BART from the existing Measure C (Esc.$)I•2 75,617.9
Concord Station, via Port Chicago Highway to a
new station located adjacent to the existing North TOTAL $ 450,517.9
Concord/Martinez Park and Ride lot. From there
the alignment enters the State Route 4 median. Measure C funds shown in escalated dollars.
State Route 4 has been modified to accommodate Actual commitment is in 1988 dollars as shown in
the BART tracks including providing an acceptable Appendix A.
grade (3.5%) over the Willow Pass summit. The 1 $59,990,100 of this funding represents the BART
project terminates at the new Pittsburg/Bay Point share of the Willow Pass Grade Lowering and Bailey
station at Bailey Road. Road Interchange projects.
D 48 Appendix D 7/19101 Draft /_
J — (”) &
. 2001 DRAFT STRATEGIC PLAN-Fact Sheet CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
LEGEND
— — — EXISTING ra
PROPOSED
EXISTI
® SIGNAL G I
P an Idem Y
Ill
O
a
SYCAMCM VALLEY RgAD
1-680/SYCAMORE FUNDING SOURCES ($ X 1000):
VALLEY ROAD PARK &
RIDE State 405.0
Local 767.2
Measure C (Es, 2,411.4
PROPONENT:
�.
DANVILLE TOTAL $ 3,583.6
rd1k' r
PROJECT NO:
Measure C funds shown in escalated dollars.
2206PR/2206
'�.;;�' ""� Actual commitment is in 1988 dollars as shown in
Appendix A.
DESCRIPTION: Z Funded from both the Commuterway Fund category
and the Carpool, Vanpools and Park & Ride Lots
The Park-and Ride lot provides approximately 240 category.
parking spaces, a bus transfer station and a car pool
staging area located at the north east corner of I-
680/Sycamore Valley Road interchange. The Park
and Ride lot was constructed in right-of-way owned
by the Town and was served by both BART and
County Connection buses.The interchange on the
east side of the freeway was modified to a diamond
configuration with restriping and island median
changes to Sycamore Valley Road.
STATUS:
Construction completed in 1998.
7/19/01 Draft Appendix D D 49
2001 DRAFT STRATEGIC PLAN-Fact Sheet CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATIONAUTHORITY
L
Existing
a
—,low AGG661 Station
4 3
prop d Bus
-rransie
Ares
Bridge
U PhsfiG 3
-------......
CoSP site
Xv--�.". L���j, �dddd"``� O
0 P\
.4
Bridge
phase 2
IPA
2gl
MARTINEZ INTERMODAL pedestrian bridge over the tracks. (Measure C isnot
FACILITY funding Phase 3.)
STATUS:
PROPONENT: The new Amtrack station is nearly complete and the
MARTINEZ new passenger boarding platforms are under con-
struction. The station landscaping is also under
PROJECT NO: construction and will be opening in the Fall of 2001.
2208PR/2208
DESCRIPTION:
The Martinez Intermodal Transit Facility is
planned to be constructed in three phases. Phase I FUNDING SOURCES ($ X 1000):
will consist of 175 parking spaces, a new bus Federal (ISTEA/TEA-2 I/TEA) 4,500.0
0
.M. State (TCI) 3,300.0
facility, including apprp1hkately ten new bus bays BART 2,000.0
ts, creek landscaping/
with canopies,bicik Measure C Esc. 4,700.0
ga
miti t1on a . dVotnFrol, acquisition of the (
STIP 4,900.0
-"
existing stat�ioSd bus turnaround site fora City (Minor Capital o 100.0
carpool/vanpool staging area, and site preparation Prop.116 3,400.0
for the new station. Phase 2 includes a new station, TFCA 300.0
new platforms,trackwork,external passenger Union Pacific 4,700.0
waiting area, creek pedestrian bridge, and HRGC (via PUC) 200.0
passenger amenities. Phase 3 includes additional SLTPP 1,400.0
land acquisition north of the tracks,new road
access to the north lot (both east and west), TOTAL 29,500.0
approximately 425 additional parking spaces and a
D 50 Appeyidbc D 7119101 Draft
2001 DRAFT STRATEGIC PLAN-Fact Sheet CONTRA COSTA TRANSPOR TA TION A UTHORITY
SAN RAMON / I
INTERMODAL
TRANSIT FACILITY ' I I
TR I
Q
PROPONENT: I a I I
SAN RAMON l� I
EXECUTIVE --�� ��--
PROJECT NO: - _ _ PARKWAY I
i 1 r - �
2209PR/2209
I i Car Pool Parking I
DESCRIPTION: I I
The Intermodal Transit Facility
provides approximately 54 I
parking spaces, and agi all weather I O I r Tr ster Area
I
I
public transit u ?
. ch o I
accom. t �nsit vehicles. i z
The ci .1?located at Camino
Ramo" Executive Parkway in
8,19 Ranch. The intent of the I I I
facility is to provide a transfer I I
point for buses and carpools in I I I
order to reduce the number of
single occupant vehicles on the I
road. I I
STATUS: I I
Construction completed in 1996.
HIM
FUNDING SOURCES ($ X 1000):
Federal (ISTEA) 900.0
State (TSM) �A eic 116.6
Measure C (Esc.$ '? �'° 1,047.7
TOTAL $ 2.,064.3
Measure C funds shown in escalated dollars.
Actual commitment is in 1988 dollars as shown in
Appendix A.
2 Funded from both the Commuterway Fund category
and the Carpools, Vanpools and Park & Ride Lots
category.
7/19/01 Draft Appendix D D 51
5 '�'9
+ •2001 DRAFT STRATEGICPLAN-Fact Sheet CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATIONAUTHORITY
EL CERRITO
PLAZA BART
STATION
PARKING I
STRUCTURE Fe P Cerrito Del Norte
BART Station
I r
PROPONENT: 61 C e r r i t o
EL CERRITO
BART Station
k Parking Lot
PROJECT NO:
2301 --ei.Cerrito Plan
BART Sfat:on
DESCRIPTION: _:r;�:•�:!� .-�.��}�—Shopping Center
The project includes a new y
parking structure near the El
gen �ranaratn Sar 1 , It
Cerrito Plaza BART Station that
will provide approximately 400
new spaces. The parking garage so
is to facilitate a joint development l Berkeley
project as part. 'kie� m `Jath Be+"Keiey
revitalizatiorl�ie N Cerrito BAF T Station
C. % Y
Plaza,-. pl 6riter. As '
curre'tl, eirvisioned,the spaces
will be incorporated into a
residential/commercial structure J
in the Plaza Shopping Center.
The Measure C funded spaces
will be dedicated to BART
patrons in the peak period,but
available for shopping center
patrons in the off peak. The City
wishes to use the parking
structure as a catalyst to help FUNDING SOURCES ($ X 1000):
trigger additional economic
activity in the vicinity of the Measure C (Esc.$)'?z 6,536.9
station and the El Cerrito Plaza
sTOTAL $6,536.9
hopping area.
' Meas'' re C f6ffds shown in escalated dollars.
Actual ommitment is in 1988 dollars as shown in
STATUS: Appendr �C.
The City is exploring the joint developement Z
In addition, West County Subregional Transportation
project as part of the revitalization of the El Cerrito Mitigation Program (STMP) funds will be available to
Plaza Shopping Center. The Authority has supplement Measure C funds ($459,000 is anticipated).
established a deadline of December 31, 2002 for
the City and BART to execute binding agreement
with the developer and property owner.
D 52 Appendix D 7/19/01 Draft
S --7(0
2001 DRAFT STRATEGIC PLAN-Fact Sheet CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION A UTHORITY
IRON HORSE Pleasant
`asant I
M ems°
TRAIL
e
PROPONENT:
EAST BAY
REGIONAL
Walnut Creek
PARK DISTRICT 24
(EBRPD)
PROJECT NO:
3101 `
Alamo'•. aTONE r
M°
This project installs signals,
striping, and signs the Iron
Horse Trail cro ;!e s in Danvill ,�.�aE
e'
Danvill t amon; it
0_1�1 _
videi'al funding for the GE
provides g LEGEND
overcrossing at Ygnacio Valley
................... TRAIL
Road in Walnut Creek; it �`-
completes the trail paving in °►M�'
southwestern Contra Costa °
County down to the Alameda/
Contra Costa County line; and it
provides fencing on the portion of sao
trail adjacent to the San Ramon San
Ramon
Royal Vista Golf Course.
STATUS:
Construction completed in 1994.
FUNDING SOURCES ($ X 1000):
Federal (TEA) 640.0
Local (Measure A 85.9
Measure "C ' 714.6
TOTAL $ 1,440.5
Measure C funds shown in escalated dollars.
Actual commitment is in 1988 dollars as shown in
Appendix A.
7/19/01 Draft Appendix D D 53
5-- 7/
• 2001 DRAFT STRATEGIC PLAN-Fact Slteet CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATIONAUTHORITY
WALNUT CREEK
CHANNEL TRAIL
PROPONENT:
EAST BAY J� S° ��•,
REGIONAL PARK
DISTRICT (EBRPD)
�1\110 .,—Walnut
Channel CTraisl
PROJECT NO:
3102 TO BE COMPLETED ��•
PARTLY WITH •
MEASURE C FUNDS. - -,�� CONCOFM AN
DESCRIPTION:
This trail starts at the northern
terminus of the Iron Horse Trail
and runs along the Walnut Creek
Channel northward to connect y
with the Delta DeAnza Trail. The LEGENDTOBE;COMP,LETEQ
WITKOTHER FUNDS.
multi-use path is. foot wide ��,•„��, a i
EXISTING
paved hiking Aail.
••••••• PROPOSED TRAIL
01���
The CrConcord has secured 3” '�''t`�.
Transportation Development Act -u
.(TDA) funds to.supplement the
East Bay Regional Park District n ��
Proposition 116 grant and
Transportation Enhancement Act
(TEA) funds, in addition to
Measure C funds. EBRPD is the
lead agency for the project and is 11
coordinating with Concord and the
County. `
EW goes
STATUS:
Construction of the trail is complete except for FUNDING SOURCES ($ X 1000):
undercrossings at Willow Pass Road,Diamond
Boulevard, SR242 and Concord Avenue, and the State 600.0
parallel pedestrian bridge over the channel at Federal1 10.0
Concord Avenue. The undercrossing and pedestrian Measure C (Esc.$), 406.1
'0'V V;� %
bridge at Concord Avenue has been bid and the m;v.
construction contract has been awarded.Measure C TOTAL $ 1,116.1
will partly fund the construction of the pedestrian
bridge over the channel at Concord Avenue.
Measure C funds shown in escalated dollars.
Construction will start in April of 2001 and should be Actual commitment is in 1988 dollars as shown in
completed by Fall 2001. Appendix A.
D 54 Appendix D 7/19/01 Draft
s= 7
2001 DRAFT STRATEGIC PLAN-Fact Sheet CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION A UTHORITY
RELIEZ VALLEY
ROA® TRAIL
PROPONENT:
LAFAYETTE
PROJECT NO:
310313103G L AVE
DESCRIPTION: \
This project is a portion of a 3
multi-jurisdiction effort between
Lafayette, Contra Costa County LEGEND
and Martinez to buila bicycle
trail from Pleasa ' i Road in Jro 00019 PROJECT LOCATION
Lafayette t ra Valley 31Q3 CCTA PROJECT NUMBEF
Road/ Avenue in
Martine. e Lafayette portion
of the project is being funded by N
Measure C and will extend the
tu
existing pathway along Reliez
Valley Road beyond Silver Dell
Road and to the City limit. This
extension will provide a safe
connection for pedestrians and Up.E LN
bicyclists north of Silver Dell
Road to connect with the path to
be completed by Contra Costa g
County and transverse four
jurisdictions.
STATUS: FUNDING SOURCES ($ X 1000):
The project design phase started
in August 2001. Measure C (Esc.$)1.2 260.2
TDA 120.0
CMAQ 500.0
STIP 107.0
Local 183.5
TOTAL $ 1,170.7
' Measure C funds shown in escalated dollars.
Actual commitment is in 1988 dollars as shown in
Appendix A.
' Funded by Lamorinda Traffic program and Regional
Bicycle and Pedestrian Trail categories.
7/19/01 Draft Appendix D D 55
7 4
r 2001 DRAFT STRATEGIC PLAN-Fact Sheet CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATIONAUTHORITY
ST. STEPHENS
TRAIL
PROPONENT: _
AITARIyeJ
ORINDA
L
PROJECT NO: -
3106/3106GL
DESCRIPTION:
This project created a bicycle path
and pedestrian trail southeast of
State Route 24 along the freeway
right-of-way and &I,
tra Costa
County. SanitaV0.1exi
ict fee
�i
strip. I sting paths Ik0 /// ?.��'� %� D TRAIL
on Ca Pablo Road and St. �\ l�`\ �,+j�J F.R. /
Stephens Drive. Existing ��`� �\ , 'Uri•r•it7J�
topography and trees were
� '
preserved as much as possible. � . rya�,� �—_�i� ; LEGEND
Trees that had to be removed -------
✓ 1�<>°•J -__—' -------= EXISTING
were either be relocated or
mitigated within the right-of-way. i �/ ✓/ �`)��''o I; PROPOSED TRAIL
7
t
STATUS:
Constriction is complete. ;1
i
J
FUNDING SOURCES ($ X 1000):
Federal (TEA) 200.0
State (TDA) 105.0
Local (TFCA Gr 160.0
Measure C (ESC-0 1,183.9
TOTAL $ 1,648.9
' Measure C funds shown in escalated dollars.
Actual commitment is in 1988 dollars as shown in
Appendix A.
2 Funded from both Gateway/Lamorinda Traffic And
Regional Bicycle and Pedestrian Trail Categories).
D 56 Appendix D 7/19/01 Draft
= 7//
2001 DRAFT STRATEGIC PLAN-Fact Sheet CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATIONAUTHORITY
TO BE FUNDE�p
BY ME
ASURE C.—_
ROAD
WILLOW PASS
A
cc
.ry
J
2CCSlq• ANAL
TRA
C n c o r d
in
COMPLETED
W
LEGE 101
.................. PROPOSED TRAIL
TO BE.FUNDED...
BY
OTHER.SOURCEsi
SO
DELTA DE ANZA TRAIL STATUS:
The trail is essentially complete except at its easterly
PROPONENT: end between Hillcrest and Neroly Roads. Private
EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK development adjacent to that section is conditioned to
construct that segment of the trail. Construction of the
DISTRICT (EBRPD) signalized at grade crossing near Neroly Road is
anticipated in 2003.
PROJECT NO:
3108
DESCRIPTION: FUNDING SOURCES ($ X 1000):
The Delta De Anza Trail connects Central and
Eastern Contra Costa County. The trail has nine Local 440.0
sections, and is the result of a coordinated effort of State 300.0
the East Bay Region g rk District,the County, Measure C (Esc.'42"i 415.7
u
and the Cities ,sbuand Antioch. It will TOTAL 1,155.7
provide acc, 4fAmber of community,
Sla recreational facilities, as well as
y V
the Ba 1nt BART station. Measure C trail funds
Measure C funds shown in escalated dollars.
will be used to contruct and signalize at grade Actual commitment is in 1988 dollars as shown in
railroad crossing near Neroly Road. The remainder Appendix A.
of the trail will be funded with proposition 116,
State, County,Developer,Measure AA and
Measure C (from the State Route 4/Bailey Road
Interchange project) funds.
7119101 Draft Appendix D D 57
'5
2001 DRAFT STRATEGIC PLAN-Fact Sheet CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATIONAUTHORITY
� o
r`a
w
� O
�'1 v
Uj V
l
I Verde
A. Elementary
U) School_ m
Q
� North Richmond-
Y Ball Park
. i ........ Davis'; ?�: ••• Do via Pn rk
Marsh ¢ 4 y I
at Observation N I $
cr
Platform j� Z IZI
San 0 I _
a Pablo L /
5 BayMeasure "C•' Project--i
LEGEND
t• % PROPOSED TRAIL
a WE
d
a.
WILDCAT CREEK REGIONAL
TRAIL STATUS:
Design for the railroad crossing is complete.
However, changes to the project requested by the City
PROPONENT: of San Pablo have significantly increased the
EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK construction cost resulting in a$1 million funding
DISTRICT (EBRPD) shortfall. EBRPD is investigating additional sources
of funding to complete the project. Construction is
PROJECT NO: not likely to proceed prior to 2004.
3109
DESCRIPTION:
The Wildcat Creek Regional Trail provides a FUNDING SOURCES ($ X 1000):
pedestrian/bicycle connection between the San
Francisco Bay Trail and the Ridge Trail in the:East Federal 1,326.0
Bay. East Bay Regio Park District is State 250.0
constructing a 1.= zrltion along the shoreline Local 631 .5
near the o Iitcat Creek which will Measure C (Esc. ' 556.9
connectie0,11.1—s of Richmond and San Pablo and
provide a rink to the Richmond Parkway. Measure TOTAL $ 2,764.4
C funds will supplement the Corps of Engineers,
Coastal Conservancy, Environmental ' Measure C funds shown in escalated dollars.
Actual commitment is in 1988 dollars as shown in
Enhancement,and EBRPD Measure AA funds to Appendix A.
construct a bridge over the SP and AT&SF railroad
tracks.
D 58 Appendix D 7/19101 Draft
1001 DRAFT STRATEGIC PLAN-Fact Sheet CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATIONAUTHORITY
MARSH CREEK I
TRAIL CROSSING N New Signalized Crossing
AT STATE ROUTE I
4 Z
Z �—•--Existing Trail
0N 4
PROPONENT: _ GRANT ST Q SUNSET RD
EAST BAY
New Trail—►;—
REGIONAL PARK t _
r�
DISTRICT (EBRPD)
Existing Trail ap4e,'
Gb
PROJECT NO:
3110 HAVENWOOD AVE
DESCRIPTION: O �
Marsh Creek Trail links the Delta 9
9
De Anza trail to thof w LEGEND
Brentwood an E � ••••••.......•••. PROPOSED TRAIL
uninco. .. ey area, and bGteeg
provid ass to the Santa
Joaquin River shoreline. This SAND CREEK
project will provide a safe RD
crossing at State Route 4, by
moving the trail to an existing
intersection, and providing a
traffic signal.
STATUS:
East Bay Regional Park District
has completed the trail realign-
ment and construction in 1997 of
the two bridges over the canal.
FUNDING SOURCES ($ X 1000):
Local774.4
Measure C (Esc.$ 5i, 400.1
011W, i
TOTAL $ 1,174.5
' Measure C funds shown in escalated dollars.
Actual commitment is in 1988 dollars as shown in
Appendix A.
7/19/01 Draft Appendix D D 59