Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 08012000 - C8 cs TO 60ARD OF SUPERVISORS ` FROM: MAURICE M. SHIU, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR DATE: August 1, 2000 SUBJECT: Approval of the Seven Year Capital Road Improvement Program. SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION 1. Recommended Action: APPROVE and ADOPT the 1999/00 Capital Road Improvement Program (CRIP), Countywide. IL Financial Impact: Approval of the CRIP will outline the expenditures of road related capital funds in the next seven years. The CRIP is a programming document that programs funds for capital road improvement projects within the County. Approval of the CRIP by the Board does not automatically approve each individual project listed in the CRIP. Each project must undergo its own public review, engineering feasibility analysis and environmental assessment before the Board of Supervisors will consider its approval. Continued on Attachment: X SIGNATURE: " I" _RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR _RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE —APPROVE �OTHER SIGNATURE(S): ACTION OF BOARD ON AUGUST 1� 2000 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED X OTHER I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board VOTE OF SUPERVISORS of Supervisors on the date shown. X UNANIMOUS (ABSENT NQNF ) AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTESTED: AUGUST 1, 2000 WL:Je PHIL BATCHELOR, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors G:\Grpdata\TransEng\2000\Bo-Te\BO CRIP.doc and County Administrator Orlg.Div: Public Works(TE) Contact: Warren Lai-Tel.313-2408 cc: County Administrator Community Development-G.Slusher County Counsel BY , Deputy Auditor/Controller R.Gilchrist,Accounting SUBJECT: Approval of the Seven Year Capital Road Improvement Program DATE: August 1, 2000 FACE: 2 IL Financial Impact: (Continue) There is no impact to the County General Fund. III. Reasons for Recommendations and Background: On May 19, 1989, a County Road Improvement Policy was adopted to guide the development and continuation of the Capital Road Improvement Program. On April 17, 1990, the Board of Supervisors approved the first annual GRIP. This is the fifth annual Contra Costa County Capital Road Improvement Program. The CRIP plans road improvement projects for the next seven years to conform with the Congestion Management Plan which is also a seven year planning document. Adopting a CRIP to guide our capital improvements will do several things for the County: - Increase public awareness of how and where funds will be spent on our road system. - Enhance public image and public trust by showing that funds are programmed in detail and will be expended in accordance with a bona fide program. - Encourage more public involvement in the programming and expenditure of our capital funds. - Provide accurate "accountability" of whether our transportation system will meet acceptable levels of service to satisfy our growth management policies. - Provide a basis for projecting staffing needs over the next seven years. - Provide a budget tool to track expenditures of each type of funding utilized for capital improvements. The Transportation Water and Infrastructure Committee has reviewed and approved the CRIP and a copy has been sent to each member of the Board of Supervisors for their review. IV. Consequences of Negative Action: Failure to approve the CRIP will greatly hamper road improvements for the next seven years. Without an approved CRIP, the Public Works Department will lack direction for project planning and staff requirements in the coming years. Measure "C" and the County's proposed growth management policy also require a CRIP be enacted to meet the anticipated needs of new development impacts on the roadway systems. Without an approved CRIP program the County will not be able to fulfill this requirement, which would jeopardize our Measure "C" return to source funding. Contra Costa County 1999/2000 Capital Road Improvement Program rq A V ' �Ic wo FISCAL YEAR 1999/00 To FISCAL YEAR 2005/00 Contra Costa County Public Works Department 255 Glacier Drive Martinez, CA 94553-4897 (925) 318-2000 SUMMARY Can May 19, 1989,the County Road Improvement Policy was adopted by the Beard of Supervisors to guide the development and continuation of the Capital Road Improvement Program(GRIP). On April 17, 1990,the Board of Supervisors approved the first annual GRIP. This is the sixth Contra Costa County Capital Road Improvement Program. The 1999/00 CRIP plans road improvement projects for the next seven years (Fiscal Years 1999/00 through 2005/06) to conform with the Congestion Management Plan,which is also a seven-year planning document. It should be noted that the CRIP is a programming document that,once approved,will constitute a directive to and a schedule for the Public Works Director to program the engineering work on these projects. Approval of the GRIP by the Board does not automatically approve each individual project listed in the GRIP. Each project in the GRIP must undergo its own individual engineering feasibility analysis and environmental assessment. Some projects may have unexpected cost increases and/or project scope changes after thorough environmental studies. The GRIP,therefore, is expected to change as we learn more about each project. The GRIP is organized in two components. Section I shows capital outlays and revenues for each of the County's main road-related revenue generation sources over the next seven years. Section II contains the project descriptions for each individual project identified in Section I. The tables showing the anticipated capital outlays for each individual project are included with the individual project descriptions,giving the user of the GRIP a complete picture of each project all in one place in the document. Section I shows the anticipated revenue generation and expenditure of funds over the next seven years for each road-related funding source,including Area of Benefit funding sources and non-Area of Benefit funding sources. In Section I,the projects are arranged alphabetically and grouped under all funding sources that are expected to provide funding for that project. A project may therefore be listed under more than one funding source in Section I. Section II provides detailed information on each of the projects that are programmed to receive funding in the next seven years. These information sheets are sorted alphabetically by the project title and provide the location, a brief description and the need for the project. The estimated cost, sources of funding, and expenditure plan are also included. In addition, the information sheets include project location maps,the Supervisorial District the project is located in, and the project Work Order number(W.O.) and a location map. Two tables of contents are included on the following pages: the first lists all projects by funding source, and the second lists all projects alphabetically. This will enable the user to find a project either by itself or in the context of its funding sources. wL:wl g:\transeng\wl\crip\document\cripsummary.doe PROPOSED CAPITAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Table of Contents PROJECT NAME PAGE# CRIP Introduction& Reuort I Funding Sources 13 Federal. State and Redevelopment Funds 16 Bethel Island Bridge Replacement 52 Blum Road-Imhoff Drive-Arnold Way Bike Lanes 54 Byron Highway Shoulder Widening 56 Byron Highway Widening at Byron Elementary School 58 Castro Ranch Road Bike Lanes 64 Cherry Lane/Canal Trail Flashers 66 Christie Road Slide Repair 68 Delta Road Bike Lanes Phase III 88 Delta Road Bridge Replacement 90 Evora Road Widening 96 Highway 4/Sellers Avenue Traffic Signal 98 Interstate 80 Bikeway 100 Iron Horse Trail Overcrossing 102 North Broadway Infrastructure Improvements Phase II 108 North Broadway Infrastructure Improvements Phase III 110 North Richmond Curb Ramps Phase II 112 North Richmond Improvements -Pittsburg Avenue Extension 114 North Richmond Improvements - 7th Street Extension 116 North Richmond Transportation Enhancements Phase I 118 Olympic Boulevard Left Turn Pocket at Bridgefield Road 120 Pacheco Boulevard Overlay Phase I 122 Pacheco Boulevard Overlay Phase II 124 Pacheco Boulevard Overlay Phase III 126 Parker Avenue Reconstruction 132 Parr Boulevard Widening and AC Overlay 134 Port Chicago Highway Improvements 140 San Pablo Dam Road Overlay Phase I 142 San Pablo Dam Road Overlay Phase II 144 Sidewalk Gap Closure Project 146 Taylor Boulevard Overlay 156 Treat Boulevard Overlay 160 2000 Bridge Retrofits 162 2001 Bridge Retrofits 164 Willow Pass Road Overlay Phase 1 170 Willow Pass Road Overlay Phase Il 172 Local Funds 20 Avenida Martinez Overlay 50 Countywide Curb Ramp Projects 74 Countywide Pavement Management Projects 78 Countywide Safety Projects 80 Countrywide Signal Modifications 82 Countywide Traffic Betterment: New Signs 84 Countywide Traffic Betterment: New Striping 86 Delta Road Bike Lanes Phase III 88 Delta Road Bridge Replacement 90 Eden Plains Road Widening- Sunset Road to Marshall Court 92 Pacheco Boulevard Overlay Phase 1 122 Pacheco Boulevard Overlay Phase II 124 - Pacheco Boulevard Overlay Phase 111 126 Pacheco Boulevard/Second Avenue Traffic Signal 128 Parr Boulevard Widening and AC Overlay 134 Pleasant Dill Road/Taylor Boulevard Realignment 136 San Pablo Dam Road Overlay Phase I 142 San Pablo Dam Road Overlay Phase 11 144 Sidewalk Gap Closure Project 146 Taylor Boulevard Overlay 156 Treat Boulevard Overlay 160 Willow Pass Road Overlay Phase 1 170 Willow Pass Road Overlay Phase II 172 Measure "C"Funds 23 Clearland Drive Median Island 70 Coggins Drive Overlay 72 Countywide Measure "C"Roadway Overlays and Reconstruction 76 Loring Avenue Reconstruction 106 North Richmond Curb Ramps Phase II 112 Parr Boulevard Widening and AC Overlay 134 Valley View Road Reconstruction and Slide Repair 166 West Street Reconstruction 168 Navy Mitigation Funds 24 Evora Road Extension 94 Port Chicago Highway Improvements 140 Rodeo/Crockett Transportation Improvement Fund 25 Parker Avenue Reconstruction 132 Tosco/Solano Transportation Mitigation Fund 26 Pacheco Boulevard Realignment Phase I 130 Alamo Area of Benefit 27 Stene Valley Road/Danville Boulevard Intersection Improvements 150 Stone Valley Road Improvements: high Eagle Road to Roundhill Road 152 Stone Valley Road Improvements: Roundhill Road to Glenwood Court 154 Baypoint Area of Benefit 28 Evora Road Widening 96 Port Chicago Highway Improvements 140 Bethel Island Area of Benefit 29 Bethel Island Bridge Replacement 52 Central County Area of Benefit 30 Olympic Boulevard Left Turn Pocket at Bridgefield Road 120 Pleasant Hill Road/Taylor Boulevard Realignment 136 Discovery Bay Area of Benefit 31 Byron Highway Widening and Byron Elementary School 58 State Route 4/Byron Highway Intersection Improvements(Phase 2) 148 East County Area of Benefit 32 Lone Tree Widening 104 Hercules,Rodeo,Crockett Area of Benefit 33 Pomona Street Widening 138 Martinez Area of Benefit 34 Alhambra Valley Road Realignment 46 Alhambra Valley Road Safety Project at the Pig Farm Curve 48 Pacheco Boulevard Realignment Phase I 130 North Richmond Area of Benefit 35 Parr Boulevard Widening and AC Overlay 134 Third Street/Goodrick Avenue Realignment 158 Richmond/El Sobrante Area of Benefit 36 Appian Triangle Reconstruciton 36 South County Area of Benefit 37 Camino Tassajara Road Realignment at Station 570 60 South Walnut Creek Area of Benefit 38 Olympic Boulevard Widening 38 SCC Subregional Fee 40 Camino Tassajara Road Widening: Windemere Parkway to County Line 62 Tassajara Area of Benefit 39 Camino Tassajara Road Widening: Windemere Parkway to County Line 62 West County Area of Benefit 41 Appian Triangle Reconstruction 41 Proposed Project Descriptions 43 Appendices 175 Appendix A: County Road Improvement Policy 177 Appendix B: Guidelines For Expenditure of Gas Tax Revenue 187 19 PROPOSED CAPITAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Table of Contents (Listed Alphabetically) PROJECT NAME PAGE# Alhambra Valley Road Realignment 46 Alhambra Valley Road Safety Project at the Pig Farm Curve 48 Appian Triangle Reconstruction 36 Avenida Martinez Overlay 50 Bethel Island Bridge Replacement 52 Blum Road-Imhoff Drive-Arnold Way Bike Lanes 54 Byron Highway Shoulder Widening 56 Byron Highway Widening at Byron Elementary School 58 Camino Tassajara Road Realignment at Station 570 60 Camino Tassajara Road Widening: Windemere Parkway to County Line 62 Castro Ranch Road Bike Lanes 64 Cherry Lane/Canal Trail Flashers 66 Christie Road Slide Repair 68 Clearland Drive Median Island 71 Coggins Drive Overlay 72 Countrywide Signal Modifications 82 Countywide Curb Ramp Projects 74 Countywide Measure"C"Roadway Overlays and Reconstruction 76 Countywide Pavement Management Projects 78 Countywide Safety Projects 80 Countywide Traffic Betterment: New Signs 84 Countywide Traffic Betterment: New Striping 86 Delta Road Bike Lanes Phase III 88 Delta Road Bridge Replacement 90 Eden Plains Road Widening 92 Evora Road Extension 94 Evora Road Widening 96 Highway 4/Sellers Avenue Traffic Signal 98 Interstate 80 Bikeway 100 Iron Horse Trail Overcrossing 102 Lone Tree Widening 104 Loring Avenue Reconstruction 106 North Broadway Infrastructure Improvements Phase II 108 North Broadway Infrastructure Improvements Phase IIT 110 North Richmond Curb Ramps Phase II 112 North Richmond Improvements—Pittsburgh Avenue Extension 114 North Richmond Improvements—7th Street Extension 116 North Richmond Transportation Enhancements Phase I 118 Olympic Boulevard Left Turn Pocket at Bridgefield Road 120 /l3 Olympic Boulevard Widening 38 Pacheco Boulevard Overlay Phase I 122 Pacheco Boulevard Overlay Phase II 124 Pacheco Boulevard Overlay Phase III 126 Pacheco Boulevard/Second Avenue Traffic Signal 128 Pacheco Boulevard Realignment Phase I 130 Parker Avenue Reconstruction 132 Parr Boulevard Widening and AC Overlay 134 Pleasant Hill Road/Taylor Boulevard Realignment 136 Pomona Street Widening 138 Port Chicago Highway Improvements 140 San Pablo Dam Road Overlay Phase I 142 San Pablo Dam Road Overlay Phase II 144 Sidewalk Clap Closure Project 146 State Route 4/Byron Highway Intersection Improvements (Phase 2) 148 Stone Valley Road/Danville Boulevard Intersection Improvements 150 Stone Valley Road Improvements: High Eagle Road to Roundhill Road 152 Stone Valley Road Improvements: Roundhill Road to Glenwood Court 154 Taylor Boulevard Overlay 156 Third Street/Goodrick Avenue Realignment 158 Treat Boulevard Overlay 160 2000 Bridge Retrofits 162 2001 Bridge Retrofits 164 Valley View Road Reconstruction and Slide Repair 166 West Street Reconstruction 168 Willow Pass Road Overlay Phase I 170 Willow Pass Road Overlay Phase II 172 CRIP Introduction & Report r INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND The Capital Road Improvement Program(CRIP)is a programming document for the funding of capital road improvement projects within Contra Costa County. It includes estimated project costs, funding source information, and scheduling information for all known potential projects within a seven-year time period. It also includes revenue projections and a summary of project- related expenditures for each funding source. Approval of the CR1P by the Board does not automatically approve each individual project listed in the CRIP. Each project in the CRIP is subject to a separate public review, engineering feasibility analysis and environmental assessment before the Board of Supervisors will consider final approval of the project. Some projects in the CRIP may be changed in scope or estimated project cost once a thorough environmental mitigation plan is developed. As more information is gathered about a project, the Public Works Department may determine that the project will cost more than originally estimated for reasons not known at the time of this CR1P update. In such a case the Public Works Department will study various alternatives to find a solution to the funding shortfall. The Public Works Department will adjust subsequent CRIPs to reflect any changes in scope or project cost for each project. The CRIP does not escalate the project construction costs for inflation. A large portion of the funding programmed in the CRIP is from fees associated with the Area of Benefit (AOB) program which are to be adjusted yearly to provide for inflation. Since the ongoing Area of Benefit program already inflates the majority of the revenue in the CRIP, and since the CRIP is updated every other year, the added complication and expense of inflating construction and revenue costs in the CRIP is not justified. Anyone using this document as a planning device should adjust the project costs for inflation as appropriate. t HISTORY OF THE CRIP The CRIP was established by Resolution 89/306 under the County Road Improvement Policy(attached as Appendix A). The Policy was authorized by Government Code Section 66002 and is required under the Growth Management Element of the Contra Costa Transportation and Growth Management Program Ordinance approved by the voters in November 1988 (Measure C- 88). Measure C-88 required that each participating local agency develop a five-year CRIP to meet and/or maintain traffic service and performance standards. In 1991, the CRIP was expanded to cover seven years to conform to the Congestion Management Plan, and in 1992 the CRIP update was changed to a biennial schedule. 2 THE 1999/2000 CRIP Pursuant to the County Road Improvement Policy,this updated CRIP schedules road improvement projects for fiscal years 1999/2000 through 2005/2006 by attempting to balance the projected annual revenues with estimated project costs. This CRIP report includes the following: A. Revenue Sources B. Discussion of the 1999/2000 GRIP. C. Fund Estimate- Projected Annual Revenue D. Estimated Revenues and Expenditures A. REVENUE SOURCES Principal revenue sources for road improvements include local Area of Benefit(AOB)fees (charged to new development), federal and state grants, the Redevelopment Agency, Measure C "Return to Source" funds,local Road Funds,developer contributions,and funds from other agencies in cooperative projects. The amount of Area of Benefit funds available to the County at any given time is directly related to development. Measure C and local Road Funds are largely dependent on the state of the economy, and grant sources are directly affected by federal and state budgets. Many projects are funded by a combination of AOB funds and other funding sources. Shortfalls in AOB revenues can affect scheduling for projects that include federal and state grants. Therefore,when the Public Works Department receives substantial federal and state funding for a particular AOB project, that project is given high priority to prevent the loss of the secured funding. The primary funding sources are as follows: 1. Area of Benefit Revenues The unincorporated County is divided into Areas of Benefit(AOBs). Within each AOB, several road improvement projects have been identified to alleviate known traffic congestion or traffic safety problems. These projects are paid for by an AOB fee,charged to all new developments that create traffic in the area. The fee amount varies depending on which AOB the property is located in,the amount of traffic generated by the development, and the cost of the projects identified within the AOB. Using the current AOB fee schedule, vacant parcel data, and development growth projections estimated by the Public Works Department, a seven-year revenue estimate for each of the AOBs was made. After comparing this estimate to the actual revenue for the last fiscal year and 3 consulting the Engineering Services Division at Public 'Works, adjustments were made to these estimates. The table below compares the AOB revenue projections for the 1997 CRIP and the 1999/00 GRIP with the actual revenues for the last two fiscal years. Actual revenues were greater than anticipated by the 1997 CRIP by approximately $ 3.64 million for the fiscal years 1997/98 and 1998/99. In addition 1999/00 CRIP revenue projections for fiscal years 1999/00 through 2003/04 are greater than earlier projections by approximately $4.27 million. Area of Benefit revenue projections in the 1997 CRIP were approximately $17.7 million while the 1999/00 CRIP AOB revenue projections are $24.5 million. The increase in 1999/00 AOB revenue projections reflects the likelihood of continuous economic growth within the next four fiscal years. Area of Benefit Revenue Comparisons Fiscal Year F97/981 98/99 99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 1 03/04 04/05 05/06 Actual Revenues vs.Expected Revenues (x $1,000) Actual Revenue 2,279 3,845 1997 CRIP Revenue Projections 1,209 1,271 1,705 1,873 1,622 1,545 1,522 ------ ------ 1999/00 CRIP Revenue Projections ----- I ----- 2,744 2,744 2,744 2,744 1,568 1,568 1,568 Difference 1,070 2,574 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- The AOB program is constantly being updated. These updates,which revise existing AOB project lists,fee schedules and development potential,have a significant impact on potential project finding. In addition, several AOBs that are no longer needed have been or are being dissolved. 2. Measure `C' Return to Source Funds The Contra Costa Transportation Improvement and Growth Management Program ordinance ("Measure `C"')was approved by the voters in November, 1988. Measure `C'provides for a'/z-cent sales tax for transportation projects within Contra Costa County. A portion of this revenue is returned to local jurisdictions to be used for maintenance of existing roadways and construction of new facilities to fix capacity and safety problems in existence before 1988 (those problems that came into existence after 1988 are presumed to be the responsibility of new development). The proposed use for these funds is outlined in this CRIP. 4 3. Gas Tac(Local Road Fund) Highway User Fees(Gas Tax)are used to enhance road operation and maintenance and,to the extent that sufficient funds are available,to improve traffic safety throughout the County. Road funds are also used to leverage funds from other sources, such as a match for federal or state programs, in order to take full advantage of federal and state grant opportunities. 4. Grants The Public Works Department continuously submits grant applications for projects,due at various times of the year,for projects throughout the County. Each type of grant has unique project criteria. Some of these grants and their criteria are listed in Table C at the end of this section. Most applications compete state-wide for funding, from the smallest safety project to the largest road extension project. In many cases where local road funds are used, the Public Works Department looks for grants or other ways to stretch its budget and to increase the number of improvement and maintenance projects. 5. Redevelopment Agency The Public Works Department works with the County Redevelopment Agency to fund and to construct transportation infrastructure projects that support economic development in redevelopment areas, such as Bay Point, Oakley, or Rodeo. If a proposed Public Works project meets the funding criteria for both the Public Works funding source and the Redevelopment Agency's funding source,the two agencies will contribute toward the construction of that project. For example, the Parker Avenue Reconstruction project in Rodeo will be funded in part by the Redevelopment Agency and Public Works Department sources. The Redevelopment Agency may also work with developers in the area to help fund Public Works projects to mitigate the impacts of their developments. 6. Regional Fees The County participates in the East County Regional Fee program to fund the construction of the State Route 4 Bypass (SR4BP), improvements to State Route 4, and the Buchanan Road Bypass. Because the fee collection for the SR4BP has been made separate from the AOB fees,the SR4BP is not included in the 1999/00 CRIP. In the past the SR4BP fees were part of the AOB fees and were separated out after the fees were collected. Now that the SR4BP fees are collected separately, the programming of the SR4BP project is done entirely by the East Contra Costa Fee Authority and not the County. Another regional fee was added to the West County jurisdictions in 1997. This"WCC Fee" was established to fund regional improvements to west county infrastructure, such as the widening of SR 4 in the vicinity of I-80. Because this fee and its projects are also administered by a separate authority, its revenues and expenditures are not covered by this CRIP. s 7. Ad hoc Developer Fees When a large development makes a significant impact on the roadway system,the developer may be required to contribute to a road improvement fund to mitigate the impacts of the development. Currently, there are two active mitigation funds, both mitigations of large "clean fuels"projects by local refineries. The"Tosco/Solan Transportation Mitigation Fund"provides for a contribution toward Pacheco/Martinez area projects of$ 500,000 per year for 10 years. In 1995,the"Rodeo/Crockett Transportation Improvement Fund"provided$4,500,000 toward projects in the Rodeo/Crockett area. Both funds are listed as separate funding sources in the 1999/00 CRIP. B. THE 1999/00 CRIP One major funding source for projects included in the GRIP is the County Area of Benefit (AOB) program. The AOB program provides funding to improve the safety and capacity of the arterial road network in the County through the establishment and collection of traffic mitigation fees. The AOB fees are assessed to all new development in the unincorporated areas of the County. The AOBs are continually being revised and updated to reflect changes in the project lists, cost estimates,estimated development potential and AOB fee area boundaries. Since the last GRIP, several AOB's have undergone major changes, such as revision in the existing project lists or dissolution and absorption into an adjacent AOB. Some of these AOBs are no longer funding projects within the seven-year life of this CRIP. This is because of limited development potential(and the consequent limited revenues),high debt, or projects that are simply too expensive to be funded within the seven years. The following table summarizes the AOBs that are not funding new projects in this CRIP. 6 AREA OF BENEFIT STATUS Partially absorbed into Martinez AOB in 1995; remainder to be absorbed Briones AOB into the Hercules/Rodeo/Crockett AOB. Fund balance and lone project to be transferred to Martinez AOB. AOB revenue projections very low, Kensington AOB and Assessment District now in place. The County is considering options for remaining AOB balance. Very little development potential left Lamorinda AOB and a very low balance remaining. This AOB to be absorbed into the Central County AOB. Very low revenue projections. This Marsh Creek AOB AOB will be absorbed into the East County AOB. Still development potential,but no Pacheco AOB priority project identified. This AOB will be updated with a new project list. Still some development potential,but Pittsburg/Antioch AOB no projects identified that fall within funding limitations. South Walnut Creek AOB Still some development potential,but AOB is paying off debt for past construction of the Olympic Boulevard Widening project. West County AOB Very little development potential and substantial debt from the past construction of the Appian Triangle Reconstruction project. Before the 1997 CRIP,the County Area of Benefit program revenues had been much lower than expected. As a result,many AOB projects in the CRIP have been delayed and few have been added. The basic changes from the 1997 CRIP to°the 1999/00 CRIP are the removal of projects that 7 i4 were completed prior to the start of FY 99100 and those that have been delayed beyond the seven year GRIP window. Some projects have been added,but most of these are primarily funded by non- AOB revenue sources. Tables A and B show the estimated project revenues and expenditures for the next seven years. Table A is the "Summary of Projected Annual Revenue",which estimates the current balance and annual revenue that each funding source will generate. Table B is the "Summary of Projected Annual Expenditures,"which shows the estimated overhead costs and projected yearly expenditures for each program element. The Area of Benefit revenue projections often do not directly correspond to the expenditure projections for the same year. It is not always possible to spend all revenues each year, mainly because some projects need multiple years of funding before construction can begin. The non-AOB expenditures and revenues shown include only those that have been budgeted at this time. C. FUND ESTIMATE-ESTIMATED ANNUAL REVENUE The fund estimate(Summary of Projected Annual Revenue) is shown in Table A. The first part of the estimate shows the projected revenues for non-Area of Benefit funding sources and the second part shows the projected revenues for the Areas of Benefit. Some of the AOBs have low fund balances and are not expected to receive much revenue in the near future. In these AOBs the revenue will not cover the administrative costs for managing the AOB funds. This is one of the reasons that some of the AOBs will be dissolved and merged with others during the AOB updates. Details of the AOB updates were discussed in the previous section. D. ESTIMATED REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES The fund estimates in Table A(following the text of this report)represent an attempt by staff to adjust the revenue picture based on what we know from current development applications and historical trends. The County appears to be emerging from its economic slowdown, so the AOB revenue is expected to come in at a slightly faster pace,perhaps enabling the County to construct more projects in the CRIP. Table B is a summary of the expected expenditures from each of the identified sources. This expenditure table is based on the costs of the planned projects within each funding source, their priority on each funding source's project list, and the expected revenue for that funding source. If the revenues in Table A fall short of expectation, the expenditures in Table B will have to be adjusted accordingly. 8 41 The 1999/2000 CR,IP shows the County plans for capital road improvements into the twenty- first century. With the expected increase in economic development in the coming years,the Area of Benefit revenue projections may increase somewhat. This could translate into more money to complete AOB projects in the coming years. Future AOB updates will also impact AOB fee amounts and project lists. Continued efforts to secure grants and through cooperative relationships with other public agencies will allow the County to make the best use of its financial resources for capital improvement projects. WUWI gAuunseng\whcripkripreport.doc 9 Table A Summary of Projected Annual Revenue (All values shown in thousands of dollars) Fiscal Year End of FY 7 Year Revenue No. Program Element 98/99 Balance99/00 00101 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 Projected Balance Non-Area of Benefit Sources 60410 Fed,State,&Redevelopment N/A 254 3,000 2,240 4,000 2,000 1,500 1,500 14,494 14,494 60440 Locally Funded N/A 1,281 1,305 1,331 1,358 1,385 1,413 1,441 9,514 9,514 60420 Measure C N/A 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 10,500 10,500 Navy Mitigation 6,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,000 Rodeo/Crockett Transportation Improvement 3,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,000 Fund Tosco/Solan Transportation 2,000 500 500 500 500 500 500 3,000 5,000 Mitigation Funds Subtotal 11,000 3,535 6,305 5,571 7,358 5,385 4,913 4,441 37,508 48,508 Areas of Benefit 60461 Alamo 1,035 224 224 224 224 1 128 128 128 1,278 2,313 60457 Ba int 307 79 79 79 79 45 45 45 449 756 60462 Bethel Island 30 95 95 95 95 54 54 54 540 570 60464 Central County 3.017 296 296 296 296 169 169 169 1 689 4 706 60452 Discovery Bay 135 41 41 41 41 23 23 23 234 369 60465 Bast County 648 312 312 312 312 178 178 178 1,784 2,432 60466 Here./Rodeo/Crockett 2 30 30 30 30 17 17 17 173 175 60469 IMarsh Creek 5 7 7 7 7 4 4 4 41 46 60470 IMartinez 912 255 255 255 255 146 146 146 1,458 2,3701 North Richmond 27 71 71 71 71 40 40 40 403 430 60456 Pacheco 429 26 26 26 26 15 15 15 151 580 60471 Pittsbur Antioch 2 37 37 37 37 21 21 21 212 214 60454 Richmond/ElSobrante 47 136 136 136 136 78 78 78 778 825 60473 South County AOB 337 74 74 74 74 42 42 42 423 760 60840 South County JEPA(Sub- 348 47 47 47 47 27 27 27 268 616 Regional Fee) 60840 South County JEPA(Regional 91 52 52 52 52 30 30 30 298 389 60472 South Walnut Creek 17 23 23 23 23 13 13 13 132 149 60474 Tassa'am 824 144 144 144N9,34 82 82 82 821 1,645 60475 West County2 13 13 13 8 8 8 75 77 Subtotal 8,215 1961 1 961 1 9611 121 1 121 1 121 1l207 19 422 Total 19 215 5496 8 266 7 5326,506, 6,034 1 5,562 1 48,715 _67,9301 10 Table B Summary of Projected Annual Project Expenditures (All values shown in thousands of dollars) Fiscal Year 7 Year Na, Program Element 99/00 00/01 01102 02/03 03!04 04105 05106 Projected Non-Area of Benefit Sources 60410 Fed,State,&Redevelopment 2,608 7,759 1,405 522 2,354 1,441 1,738 17,827 60440 Locally Funded 2,593 2,072 1,273 1,701 1,744 1,265 I,265 11,913 60420 Measure C 2,295 1,100 1,100 1,100 2,396 1,100 1,100 10,191 Navy Mitigation 52 0 55 550 550 11650 2,167 5,024 Rodeo/Crockett Transportation Improvement 52 2,925 - - - 2,977 Fund Tosco/Solano Transportation Mitigation 178 110 200 1,5$0 1,000 - - 3,038 Funds I Subtotal 7,778 13,966 4,033 5,423 8,044 5,456 6,270 50,970 Areas of Benefit 60461 Alum - 31 96 3701 653 V1150 60457 Ba oint 20 35 140 572 767 60462 Bethel Island II 55 129 600 400 1195 60464 Central Coup 100 50 50 50 50 300 60452 Discova Ba - 17 16 179 165 377 60465 East Coun 50 125 75 50 300 60466 Here./Rodeo/Crockett - - 20 55 50 125 60+169 Marsh Creek 60470 Martinez 187 145 660 1,575 120 2 687 North Richmond 40 32 40 38 200 350 60456 Pacheco 60471 Pittsburg/Antioch 604554 Richmond/El Sobtante 35 J35 -35 a35 -35 35 -35 245 60M South Coun AOB 365 480 545 60940 South County]EPA(Sub- - _ 10 10 10 30 Regional Fee) 60840 South County]EPA - - - e ionai Fee 60472 ISouth Walnut Greek 17 I7 17 1 17 17 17 17 119 60474 ITassaiant 10 10 10 30 60475 West County 50 50 50 50 50 50 52 352 Subtotal 685 688 1 159 2,9M 1298 1.167 589 8 572 Total 463 14,654 5,192 409 %342 6,;23 6 859 59,542 11 Table C ACRONYMS FOR GRANT PROGRAMS USED IN THE CRIP I. TEA 21 (Transportation Equity Act for the 2181 Century) A. STP Funding Source:Federal funds that are programmed by (Surface Transportation Program) MTC. Purpose:Funds emphasize maintenance of the existing transportation systems including highways,local arterials, transit systems,and ped/bicycle facilities. B. CMAQ Funding Source:Federal funds administered by MTC. (Congestion Mitigation and Air Purpose:To insure conformity of federal highway and Quality Program) transit projects with the Clean Air Act. C. TEA Funding Source:Federal funds administered by MTC. (Transportation Enhancement Activity) Purpose:Funds projects ranging from pedestrian& bicycle facilities,scenic or historic highway programs, landscaping&scenic beautification and preservation of abandoned railway corridors. D. RTSOP Funding Source:Federal funds administered by MTC. (Regional Traffic Signalization Purpose:Funds for controller upgrades and other traffic Operations Program) related projects which lead to improved traffic flows along arterials to improve air quality. II. CDBG Funding Source:Federal funds administered by CDD. (Community Development Block Grant) Purpose:Funds that can be used for frontage improvements in economically depressed areas. II. HES Funding Source:Federal. (Hazard Elimination/Safety) Purpose:Funds to correct specific safety problems. III. HBRR Funding Source:Federal. (Highway/Bridge rehabilitation& Purpose:For bridges in need of replacement,and for Replacement) seismic retrofit program. IV. TCSP Funding Source:Federal. (Transportation Community and System Purpose:For projects that improve the efficiency of the Preservation Pilot Program) transportation system and reduce environmental impacts of transportation. V. TDA Funding Source: State funds,administered through MTC. (Transportation Development Act) Purpose:For construction of bicycle and pedestrian facilities. VI. TDM Funding Source:Measure C funds. (Transportation Demand Management) Purpose:For carpool,vanpool,park&ride lots,and other projects that'provide and promote'the use of commute alternatives. VIL TEA Funding Source:Federal (Transportation Enhancement Activities) Purpose:Funds for building pedestrian and bicycle type projects that enhance the transportation system without adding capacity. VIIL TFCA Funding Source: State funds,administered through (Transportation Fund for Clean Air) Regional Air Quality Management District Purpose:For projects that reduce motor vehicles emissions,and to support implementation of transportation control measures. IX. TLC Funding Source:Federal. (Transportation for Liveable Communities) Purpose:Funds for transportation projects that support a community's development and enhance their identity, mobility,and overall quality of life. X. TSM Funding Source:State funds. (Transportation System Management) Purpose:To provide for effective transportation management systems in the major urbanized areas. TSM projects improve peak period highway traffic flow without increasing the number of through-lanes. g:\transeng\wl\crip\document\cripacronym.doc 12 SECTION I Funding Sources 13 F'undine Sources 15 Al >; +o00 c �c c rw o C M O tri d �! C 0 N V7 >y N oti Cn �f eq try � V'1 Vy p O E [�? N N Coo Q w N a WN c C4 ani wlb 2 a 00 0 Vim') C� V'1 N N C`• O P O M CN o Q, ✓� a 0. t-7 O N A c N 'k7 A o W) .b .> p Fp+ c 4o W H � tho zo o W cn b w d 0 coo co „ o rn Ui U {may d O p L1j �4' U G7 enCD U o C7 Afog O � "4=1Ln a� 0 oGo:jEn W � o '� x ,� {7 rn � � a' w C7 •,, d fn � °OU U W G o � U A W x 16 0 0 N � r- 0 UA VA oo.41 ; VIA 06, 'o. i s tp � � Axa , b W t� fl , o i W ' o �0 �" C'4 cc c- N v eh e$ kn csW ern t. n 00 at a A � civ a ccs o r� ca o c o ccs a ca oo c� r3 o cs rvy d en r ami M `�D 4't d' CR �,c5 tics M tr't,.., N in d. d� °v,° ® g C M O o L 60s his Wog ci� 11 E� w � 60) gg 00 W4 o � 10 1 O p Qp0 43 � � kn a va 4N � 18 o a ca a W c> 4 401 110, A a * 19 <D tn o 0 0 m p 4'1 M N v`a . o Mn CD 0 C o ,In y O W) M N w � @ O tn O N en O wen M O vi en N rn en O O N W � 0 O C C to C tn Vl O CCN CN' M M w C C C v'1C C C t` C1 �C st M h 6 N kn ice. O W) O to M M N �^J >; Otn O W O kn W W o b F N d u bm a o 0 0 v� N o C 00 a en a M N Nloo o cri CV w h z z 00 25 �'o en C-4 4boq W `^ per. F a W g d d d � � g w "0 Ln a �, � � Ln w � � i C) © Aw°, w W W '-' 18 W 'S 04 d v y a d o z � � W �� c W (j W m ® A ce°i W d xC Q A W : o 0 o3 as C ren H O o a: w C�7a C) Oo W (-4 CJ U dr = � A C5, N o. 4 a N 20 r `"` r en en 15 d 0 � N ra vn c> e r Ul ✓ fid• ` �, rd � CO, v p `'� d, �`� o C? { pJ PIAP• � zl dv as tn 06 >; eq ke) 00 4= 00 o O Pr cl 22 .......... ................. ......... ........ ..................... 0 v � � r .-i c+ � Ile Uy U1 �' W 't °cry d a n A o fl ' o � 23 w � a � 4 tn >; e ll� d 'fr sM G4 Cy F Qyr O t b >; C in Cs C tn in O tn eq tr) in CN y O kn in N Q >1 ►� �i b N K o _ u y O ..O C y (/j V d El y _ Q O 'd b � O O U H Z 00 o g ET'.cd , a, d 6�9 N 6 W �✓�` O U 'C3 G 24 � � M �y >; >; ' tn /r d^ W fn en � a M a `c a tjt R p4 � 8 z o ' � b a 25 0 L a n a g � 0 tn in kri 5" C' o o 0 0 0 4s o y, o yuFy F y OUC* Z N w b m a o i .$.. o � � M a� yCD ak, r W b fAcn� d .� pcOp ami E•+ 2 a o 4. ub CIO 26 p t'(1 1 GC � w � rn en w o r7 ell S ` a d r w � � °� Al c� Z 0 e. v 7� r o rr N y, o � c W w o o c o v, en M GTr � w o r CD N rs '�"• .�. ON >; a, +� © HA ; � � w � Ar p ro c t� 1. o iM G G C 00 b _ 0 � V4 CD 6014 lz o ° 28 0 It 5.; C> �+ ;To w c m ON � � 4c yrs yi w � w � 10 `w >; m in >; LTJo SO W � ,d � ON '�+ �•� Fp Gia 00 00 o ON ri 0-4 od 44 a � w ¢ n Z o a� 4 � 29 w w o en 4n rn �o rn o >; ® c w >; o ® w >; c ��ryl A O + r�•t p N V 4 O d� v, cz r4 b . ® A C rd d d 4n 'Qy O V t"• � M a �y� U CS d jl•^ o U � U � > a' wQq y a a� 'o o � a � H 30 %d � c , ra r� p VA Flo a w ` rn dCAC'A ® P a Z s tn CL Ci vn h ti a 00 >+ ? d d vi in 00 y; a c c o 00 ry v� kn to r- au >; N o � ri �.. >; O M d W � CA en �C T QI b •� �k.n"w rte`• Qi y"; C M .r ON W � w A W � o A a � � x w U Ci W 32 c � a 0 w e w a wa � w o �a U � 33 u Y O aw Y00 >; � � 0 kn Cr, en Goa Fn knm Rn o P4 eq cz vFni �" oV ;y; o Frrp We kn u F o rPia try to F•w G� � � o o a aN en In Or � N 'b .� O t7 O � •L d V�'t N � q w W z H � y o w � y a a w h o5.4 U � y � d H U 34 �?1 � c wo wS � i m o � w o x -: IS A � cry e 35 tn y, w u^� rn 00 en m en to t4 wo u� t r 00 � c en t- w o ;T+ C W v� kn v7 rr to en rry rn wa w o mtA N y„ o o all c � d y C7 W wo O �l b ON d © M W z U C z tsi a o o N z � � a 36 a C T O Q � W O as � C✓ M R N O wo M� a off• `� � � a v 31 Y In K q N V r^ei G `j1 ►w o y i9 V � d6 Nr o cn G . t0. o N ' ° a 4. > " CA c4 O p 38 xzi 0 In o oNo � a � y; c 7; o N >; O d N 00 >i �; � 0 w wo 0 >; r c > o � a H � a, Ew ® a00 tsi •o 4. H � 39 d d 00 � aN i N 6 d tV C t„, Gri O � O W � PC . � !�h CW � d 4) v� rHn vrti C. rr P4 a o °w v CA W �'a s w ° 0tA A z ' rA O " a � H p, 40 h kn ;T; a yi o in >! o v fr. m In 0 0 en o In � yi c � Ey 'n 21 ' w, ON a � � � ou to ti ET,( o � z 41 IrIV SECTION II Proposed Projects 43 COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY AND WARRANTIES USER UNDERSTANDS AND AGREES THAT IT IS QUITE POSSIBLE THAT ERRORS AND OMISSIONS WILL OCCUR IN DATA INPUT AND/OR PROGRAMMING DONE BY COUNTY TO PROVIDE THE DATA IN THE FORM DESIRED,AND USER FURTHER UNDERSTANDS AND AGREES THAT IT IS HIGHLY PROBABLE THAT ERRORS AND OMISSIONS WILL OCCUR IN ANY RECORD KEEPING PROCESS,ESPECIALLY WHEN LARGE NUMBERS OF RECORDS ARE DEVELOPED AND MAINTAINED,AND THAT THE DATA MAY NOT MEET USER'S STANDARDS AS TO ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS, NOTWITH- STANDING, USER AGREES TO TAKE THE DATA"AS IS,"FULLY EXPECTING THAT THERE MAY WELL BE ERRORS AND OMISSIONS IN THE DATA OBTAINED FROM COUNTY. USER FURTHER UNDERSTANDS AND AGREES THAT COUNTY MAKES ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY WHATSOEVER,WHETHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED,AS TO THE ACCURACY,THOROUGHNESS,VALUE, QUALITY,VALIDITY,MERCHANTABILITY,SUITABILITY,CONDITION,OR FITNESS.FORA PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF THE DATA OR ANY PROGRAMMING USED TO OBTAIN THE DATA,NOR AS TO WHETHER THE DATA IS ERROR-FREE,UP-TO-DATE,COMPLETE OR BASED UPON ACCURATE OR MEANINGFUL FACTS. USER FURTHER UNDERSTANDS AND AGREES THAT IT FOREVER WAIVES ANY AND ALL RIGHTS, CLAIMS, CAUSES OF ACTION OR OTHER RECOURSE THAT IT MIGHT OTHERWISE HAVE AGAINST COUNTY FOR ANY INJURY OR DAMAGE OF ANY TYPE,WHETHER DIRECT,INDIRECT,INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR OTHERWISE,RESULTING FROM ANY ERROR OR OMISSION IN DATA OR IN ANY PROGRAMMING USED TO OBTAIN THE DATA,OR IN ANY MANNER ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE DATA PROVIDED HEREUNDER. USER AGREES THAT COUNTY SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO USER FOR ANY LIABILITY,CLAIM,LOSS,DAMAGE,INJURY OR EXPENSE OF ANY KIND CAUSED OR ALLEGED TO BE CAUSED,DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY,BY THE INADEQUACY OF ANY CMS OR GIS DATA OR ANY OTHER DEFICIENCY OF THE SYSTEMS,BY ANY DELAY OR FAILURE TO PROVIDE ANY SERVICE,OR BY ANY OTHER INTERRUPTION,DISRUPTION OR LOSS OF USER OPERATIONS. USER AGREES THAT IT WILL,IRRESPECTIVE OF ANY ALLEGED LIABILITY,CLAIM,LOSS,INJURY,DAMAGE OR EXPENSE CONTINUE TO PAY ALL CHARGES IN THE AMOUNTS STATED HEREIN UNTIL THIS AGREEMENT IS PROPERLY TERMINATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ITS TERMS. NOTE: "TRIS MAP/DATABASE CONTAINS COPYRIGHTED INFORMATION OF THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA" 45 � rv3 � E §I`yyp�"�g �. � £. G,ke X•• ...Ill!NIT PROJECT NAME:Alhambra Valley Road Realignment PROJECT LOCATION:On Alhambra Valley Road near the County line at Deodara Way to Via Vaqueros. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The reversing curves have very tight radii,creating a potential for accidents. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $500,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Realign the reversing curves on Alhambra Valley Road beginning at Wanda Way and Mithwait Drive. SOURCE OF FUNDING:Martinez Area of Benefit Work Order:N/A Sup.District:II Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COST in TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. $1,000's DATE 99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 05106 Preliminary Engineering 45 10 25 10 Environmental 25 10 15 Design Engineering 50 50 Right of Way 80 80 Construction 300 300 TOTAL 500 0 10 35 455 0 0 0 0 46 �7 a CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CAPITAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ALHAMBRA VALLEY ROAD REALIGNMENT 4� qQ �t 0 YAjinvet c.c.c. PROJECT LIMIT E PRO ECT MT m"wr vmm *.I.$. a1Nt6UlYER Y..944t.YRIF.I.YM.RYai�.. LOCATION MAP iY[TtY MYIIRAY[.d1.�R[ .N YRi6 TY.RRRY.B TYI[ YIfF. RMI fii [00 Ytl.ltl ATE:02-27-97 FtEAultren_an Icr'ler" �a ')nnn 1A-)A.AA 47 PROJECT NAME:Alhambra Valley Road Safety Project at the Pig Farm Curve PROJECT LOCATION:On Alhambra Valley Road at the intersection of Rancho La Boca Road. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:By providing a greater sight distance,these improvements will provide a safer intersection for motorists. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $150,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Construction of a three way stop controlled"T"intersection. SOURCE OF FUNDING:Martinez Area of Benefit Work Order:N/A Sup.District:II Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COST in TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. $1,000's DATE 99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 Preliminary Engineering 15 0 5 10 Environmental 10 0 10 Design Engineering 15 0 5 10 Right of Way 20 0 20 Construction 90 0 90 TOTAL 150 0 5 25 1720 48 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CAPITAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ALHAMBRA VALLEY ROAD SAFETY PROJECT AT THE PIG FARM CURVE + + + + + + L® EON + + + O.f.i. 576OLAIYLN ......YAP6 P.O—[MA LOCATION MAP GOO L.. am .VdtLY•YdikAY..ITYA.d .Al Y.d.TO TYt YY. LA Y00 dW I. ATE:03-03-97 FLE:/bu/tran_an/cr'/a .d n 4-1 ')nnn 4*7-nn.en 49 q s PROJECT NAME:Avenida Martinez Overlay PROJECT LOCATION: Avenida Martinez Lane east of May Road in Richmond. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The road has deteriorated and an overlay will completely refinish the road and eliminate the current maintenance problem. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $150,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Overlay the road with asphalt concrete. SOURCE OF FUNDING: Local Road Funds Work Order:N/A Sup.District: H Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COST in TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. FAY. F.Y. F.Y. $1,000's DATE 99/00 00/01 01/02 02103 03/04 04/05 05/06 Preliminary Engineering 15 15 Environmental 5 5 Design Engineering 15 15 Right of Way 0 Construction 115 115 TOTAL 150 150 50 -...._..._.............._......._................................................................................................... f CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CAPITAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AVENIDA MARTINEZ OVERLAY 40 SA 1-00N � "ARr a , SChwL EMI I EC -t �� � L, �,�L EE s CT MIT e � NA ��gg N� �g + ura LE 53LN fu NA Z NA .13 Ci FRENCN`S ' r SANTA RITq RD MOBILEHOPARK NE 24MBRUNO RD TE CT aas, ouou�rcK .LNRYXW XNNY.T'S LOCATION MAP f !r Iii .vi fa f00 KiT irlTLY XRNRN NiPYaUL Y.!Yii!if 0lNYCL TXgi Y.V. Y00 iW iii 1� DATE'f-31-00 FILE,/bY/tram_ ! °/a'9A. ,.ai.. . . ,,.� .a,t.....nn a.., c..► n� �nnn nc.na.na 51 IF, 86 T[i Jill PROJECT NAME:Bethel Island Bridge Replacement PROJECT LOCATION:Bethel Island Road PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:This bridge eligible for replacement. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST:$6,250,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Construct a new two lane bridge to span Dutch Slough adjacent to the existing bridge. SOURCE OF FUNDING:Bethel Island Area of Benefit($1,208,000),HBRR($4,837,000) Work Order:4005 Sup.District:V Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COST in TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. $1,000's DATE 99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 Preliminary Engineering 65 65 Environmental 30 5 25 Design Engineering 300 50 250 Right of Way 650 5 645 Construction 5,000 3,000 2,000 TOTAL 6,045 t 65 55 375 645 3,000 2,000 52 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CAPITAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BETHEL ISLAND BRIDGE REPLACEMENT + + + PROJEC LOCATION + + + + + + + wa aaaaa�rww xusaw,�nsw LOCATION MAP giRY waaaaiY talAMY Yu Yann fo rmwacY fw�s wa sw as r<nr YAI�. DATEM-0366 FILE:/bu/tran_ /er /cri 11.d n 53 PROJECT NAME:Blum Road—Imhoff Drive—Arnold Industrial Way Bike Lanes PROJECT LOCATION:Blum Road,Imhoff'Drive,and Arnold Industrial Way in the Martinez area. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:The project will provide bicycle lanes on these roads. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST:$50,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Re-stripe these roadways to accommodate bicycle lanes. SOURCE OF FUNDING:TFCA Work Order:N/A Sup.District:II Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COST In TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. $1,000's DATE 99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 Preliminary Engineering Environmental 3 3 Design Engineering 12 12 Right of Way 35 Construction 35 TOTAL 50 50 54 zqoAIR f'r�► BLUM ROAD IMHOFF DRIVE ARNOLD INDUSTRIAL BIKE LANES ■ rrur.;+ t:.RRa� Rnurr�"'s. 1► ��- �r!r,,� �^Rr fir«`�,.•''�«• �R` ��� I��...� ,��`�,tryrrT *��*►ter ��^ �` � �' � ¢*���'.+♦ �.�. ♦ +f '.� { 7 k It � // � '"� {.t ♦ R4, .� e �� ' � rrr r ry :. rr f / 'R r -n `�� t./f.Mjr�'"•� � ! �.y!►j, : t,`'/,,,r"'.,,*`��,*�r+� �t�„r�r r 'r err,;� t �,r�( lr R „��� art.�►.�... � � `f t7 �{t • �+ f a *A� � r ' ri I � � t�t n �♦ �� � ��R� �' ♦� � t H}I`Ut't7(�� rr�r r r r � ` �1� RrR r �• ;� ,in ! t• �1► ;� �I �- � ,•, � :� 111 i ,: 77 ■R +t'•� i � �• 9A&MM" Hill, PROJECT NAME:Byron Highway Shoulder Widening PROJECT LOCATION:On Byron Highway at Camino Diablo,in the Byron area. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:This project improves capacity and safety on Byron Highway, ESTIMATED PROJECT COST:$554,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Widen Byron Highway at Camino Diablo to provide shoulders on both sides. SOURCE OF FUNDING:TEA 21 Work Order:N/A Sup.District:V Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) ? COST COST in TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. $1,000's DATE 99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 Preliminary Engineering 10 10 Environmental 5 5 Design Engineering 40 40 Right of Way 75 75 Construction 424 424 TOTAL 554 10 544 56 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CAPITAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BYRON HIGHWAY SHOULDER WIDENING PROJECT LIMIT FF PROJECT LIMIT *.I.*. DISCLAIMER b.b[ab.[rXl.Wr.iYAN.X Alli. b.YYAAi[i T.[YYii•sOai rNil.fY.aI1i 1 TWI LOCATION MAP Y DATE10�3-10-tm26�FLEl/b7�-/ e �1%, 63-, n %fron nnnlrrin\rrimAlAnn i,a vi >nnn ii-in.n7 57 i ! s,il�4 PROJECT NAME:Byron Highway Widening at Byron Elementary School PROJECT LOCATION:Along the east side of Byron Highway north of the intersection of Byron Highway and Byer Road(approximately I mile south of State Highway 2)in the Byron area. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:High speed and volume of traffic will make a left turn storage lane area necessary to service the school. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $230,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Widen the existing pavement to provide a dual left turn lane along the frontage of the School District office and the Byron Elementary School. SOURCE OF FUNDING:Discovery Bay Area of Benefit(66%),Caltrans(34%) Work Order:N/A Sup.District:V Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COST in TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. $1,000's DATE 49/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 Preliminary Engineering 15 0 10 5 Environmental 10 0 5 5 Design Engineering 30 0 30 Right of Way 0 0 Construction 175 0 175 TOTAL 230 0 10 10 210 58 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CAPITAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BYRON HIGHWAY WIDENING @ BYRON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL FF + + + + w a ER0 �cT LOC TION am OD + L000, l.Lt. bllCLAI!!II iTant......��w M...tl.TMtl LOCATION MAP l r..uw i.OTYMi YAi Ytt.T...ObYi[TNM .p flb t.J Y[TW tl1J. ATE12 -24-98 FILE/bu/tron_en/er'/a 3. n nnnn 47-4Q-A4 59 PROJECT NAME. Camino Tassajara Road Realignment at Station 570 PROJECT LOCATION:On Camino Tassajara Road north of the Contra Costa/Alameda County Line. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:The new alignment provides a larger radius curve which will increase driver safety. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST:$565,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Construct a 32 foot wide roadway in the eastern half of the 100 foot ultimate right of way. Project length is approximately 1,250 linear feet. SOURCE OF FUNDING: South County Area of Benefit($565,000) Work Order:4167 Sup.District:III Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COST in TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. $1,000's DATE 49/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 Preliminary Engineering 50 20 30 Environmental 25 25 Design Engineering 50 50 Right of Way 80 80 Construction 360 180 180 TOTAL 565 20 365 180 60 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CAPITAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CAMINO TASSAJARA REALIGNMENT AT STATION 570 CAMINO TASSAJARA �pW G HIGHLPI�© RD goo Cgt�r 8 RAMON O VICINITY MAP + + ENV ECT �p+(��{ t R Co�tY + + L.IMIT�CT G.I.S. 015CLAIURR f0 fl00lMMiC iW ifYAT1.M LOCATION MAP f SW YOf ,JC .'Ab IPOII IQP !YlTfY PRYflRY lfff YJdlL !ff YIfO Pf PR06Yff TYYI ff0 7Y0 YlTYN Y.V. DATE'.3 -10-98 FILE-./bu/iron. /cr /cr 12.d n Wan ann\rrinlr.rinl9 rinn Aid 1A ';Onn 11.19-AA 61 i6 g 1 PROJECT NAME:Camino Tassajara Road Widening:Windemere Parkway to County Line PROJECT LOCATION: Along Camino Tassajara Road between the proposed Windemere Parkway south to the Alameda County Line in the South County area. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:This project will accommodate the increase trac caused by the Dougherty Valley and other south county developments. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $3,950,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen the road from two to six lanes from Windemere Parkway to the County Line. SOURCE OF FUNDING: SCC Sub-regional Fee(63%),Tassajara AOB(37%) Work Order:N/A Sup.District: III Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COST In TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. $1,400's DATE 99/04 00/01 01/02 02103 03104 44/05 05/06 Preliminary Engineering 30 30 Environmental 20 20 Design Engineering 400 50 100 100 100 Right of Way 0 Construction 3,500 TOTAL 3,954 100 100 100 104 *NOTE:The timing of this project extends beyond the life of this GRIP. 62 r CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CAPITAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CAMINO TASSAJARA WIDENING WINDEMERE PARKWAY TO COUNTY LINE L IT + + �T 4- CMINW TASS.A.WA GIeQ11 k9 PROJECT ttt IMIT RAMO �°� � Nr`�F off ► VICINITY MAP a.l.s. olsar ursR Y.�......�p1I.RYALOCATION MAP �r i Y.TLY tRO..ps wt.116 Y.1f Yiff f0 FRBWf.YIYf 15. 1.. 1Bf11[lOY YJf. ATE*3 -9-98 FILE:/bu/tran_en/cr lcri 97.A n ..•54v+..+ .`.+.+\a..:..lY..i..t17 r4.,.. In.+ 94 ')f%nf% 47•+Ih•47 63 �l r PROJECT NAME:Castro Ranch Road Bike Lanes PROJECT LOCATION:Castro Ranch Road between Richmond City Limit and Alhambra Valley Road. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:This project is needed to provide adequate bicycle facilities along Castro Ranch Road. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $258,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:This project consists of road widening and pavement striping. SOURCE OF FUNDING: TDA Grant,Local Road Funds Work Order:N/A Sup.District:II Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COST in TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. $1,000's DATE 99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 Preliminary Engineering 10 10 Environmental 3 3 Design Engineering 27 27 Right of Way Construction 218 218 TOTAL 258 258 64 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CASTRO RANCH ROAD BIKE LANES MlMMMA Yllll/ID PROJECT LIMIT + + + + as s 11 i E r i t • :f rXr + + i R i it i t 1 i t i i r r er r _ " PROJECT r LIMIT r r r A fit r r tl� � d at.l.e. DISCLAIMER Y,..,tl...Y�,Y..f..Y.,,,tl LOCATION MAP all, �Y '� f,.TYME rF..1.f,.F.,Wf.I.. DAYE:03-07-00 FLE:tran-en/cr'110+.d n �+ .. ..,.;..;..�....�nA A— as -ia •snnn 44-4,1.13A 65 .u.....aW. PROJECT NAME:Cherry Lane/Canal Trail Flashers PROJECT LOCATION:Cherry Lane at the Contra Costa Canal Trail in Walnut Creek, PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:This project is needed to improve the safety of pedestrians and bicyclists at a mid-block crossing. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST:$20,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Install in pavement warning flashers and push buttons. SOURCE OF FUNDING:TDA Grant Work Order:n/a Sup.District:III Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COST in TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. $1,000's DATE 99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 05106 Preliminary Engineering 5 5 Environmental 3 3 Design Engineering Right of Way Construction 12 12 TOTAL 20 =2o 66 + f f } T it Y� ������ �� *�;i !•'�*�� �,i1' �, '� y�1 * � ��� � � �����'#9 GSR^t'e'a n a►',��1:1 • � + I I w1 �! www �� w� �www�w i ! I It • 1' 4 PROJECT NAME:Christie Road Slide Repair PROJECT LOCATION:Christie Road in the Martinez area. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:The project is needed repair a past slide and eliminate the current maintenance problem. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $420,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Reconstruct the roadway and repair the slide. SOURCE OF FUNDING:$70,000 Federal funds(FEMA),$350,000 Local Road hands Work Order: NIA Sup.District:II Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COST In TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. $1,000's DATE 99140 00/01 01/02 02/03 03104 04105 05106 Preliminary Engineering 35 35 Environmental 10 10 Design Engineering 50 50 Right of Way Construction 325 325 TOTAL 420 420 68 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CAPITAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CHRISTIE ROAD SLIDE REPAIR PROJCT I �M PROJ CT LI IT r.:.r. ntrau:rrR ..i..rua�a rna.YAT1.Y LOCATION MAP iviTLY rr....r e.vTr+a. rAi Vi60 Ti I..iY.i 4Yli p, i.i ii.Yi1W YN. ATE-04.24-00 FLE:/bu/tran_an Tari/cri l20.d A— ')A )nnn In•a0•e7 69 5Y i i W �t E � Y� E ��fLzps'+ � 36F Nt k Aye,_ E't T PROJECT NAME: Clearland Drive Median Island PROJECT LOCATION:Clearland Drive in the I3aypoint area. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:The project is required to reduce vehicle speed in a residential neighborhood using a traffic calming technique. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST:$75,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Construct a median island. SOURCE OF FUNDING:Measure C funds Work Order:4245 Sup.District:V Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COST In TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. $1,000's DATE 99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 Preliminary Engineering 10 10 Environmental 3 3 Design Engineering 15 15 Right of Way Construction 47 47 TOTAL 75 75 70 .�" • 4 i 40 i MEDIAN :I 1410 1 CLEARLAND RIVE f ZEN m� � r rrrrr�r rr.r� astl" won r�� � ■ �SRN ..M �. '/,��, �� .. ''��► ''�' '�1lI son t i �� '�#►��,� �� :"'` !''�.mss"{,��, :.'_ �_�!►��// Ii�ili�ililii -�� �-"'"' � �,, �,�"�M►�,; �•`' �l"�l�t��,� t111111111111111��!l111111#���� . , . . �� ,� '�' ♦f�r�' rrr rir�r �� • :c..:r t . ATW ..:� ..., �� FROPER-, PROJECT NAME:Coggins Drive Overlay PROJECT LOCATION:Coggins Drive from the Pleasant Hill city limits to Las Juntas Way in the Walnut Creek area. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The project is needed to extend the pavement life. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $176,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Overlay the existing roadway. SOURCE OF FUNDING:Measure C funds Work Order:4269 Sup.District:III Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COST In TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. $1,000's DATE 99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03104 04/05 05/06 Preliminary Engineering 10 10 Environmental 3 3 Design Engineering 40 40 Right of Way Construction 123 123 TOTAL 176 176 72 DRIVECOGGINS OVERLAY MM rte® �mmm No �� �� :�� � �►���/ 1 mm Mm 33 �r ♦ !�, PROJECT NAME:Countywide Curb Ramp Projects PROJECT LOCATION:Projects located throughout the unincorporated area of Contra Costa County. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:Each year new curb ramps are constructed to meet current ADA standards. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST:$50,000 per year. PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Construct ADA standard curb ramps in various locations. SOURCE OF FUNDING:Road Funds Work Order:4057 Sup.District:N/A Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COST in TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. $1,000`s DATE 99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 Preliminary Engineering Environmental Design Engineering Right of Way Construction 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 TOTAL 50 50 50 50 r�50 50 50 *NOTE:The timing of this project extends beyond the life of this GRIP. 74 F CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CAPITAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM COUNTY WIDE c::_ CURB RAMP PROJECTS RODEO. PING! 4 ARTINEZ• BAY•PONrT BEis TFiEI PITABURG + ` TIOCH SAN EL SOBRANTE OAKLEY PABLO *CONCORD PLEASANT• K4MTSEN RICHMOND HILL BRENTWOOD CLAYTON . EL • `CERRITO DISCOVERY u *WALNUT CREEK BAY ' �LAFAYETTE ORINDA . ALAW BYRON• • •BL.AMOMWK 'µ �AORAGA DANVILLE • DOVi TY ALLEY SAN RAMON CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CALIFORNIA 0-1. ...All. SCALE NOT T LOCATION MAP nanY_riosu,Y sarr.unc CS .ki Yi.b T.Ntl.bii 1Y. YAr. ATE:02-02.00 FILE;/hu/tranaen/cri/cri 100. r..SYrn.v nnnl nr:.+t....n�hh a-- C.vh A'9 ')Ahh iG".i7.hh 75 Im y u ffhf.P:4a.s his:?ir,Cxr�kt#� � � �-i �n �YE k.8•.#.. r,';':�t.'s F, F `.s`fix�x."4tl,�i.o-E�3a;:i�n ����ax���J���"a+ i't�'::r�,�i� �.sa ;'�+t{a... '��;?m�'.�x _ �1E,F%. PROJECT NAME: County Wide Measure C Roadway Overlays and Reconstruction PROJECT LOCATION:Various locations throughout East,West,and Central Contra Costa County. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:An overlay or reconstruction will completely refinish these roads and eliminate the current maintenance problem, ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,100,000 annually PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Overlay or reconstruct designated roads throughout the County during the next seven year period. SOURCE OF FUNDING:Measure C Return to Source Funds Work Order:N/A Sup.District:N/A Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COST in TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. $1,000's DATE 99/00 00101 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 Preliminary Engineering Environmental Design Engineering Right of Way Construction MMMMOXCEMMEEram -I TOTAL 7,700 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 76 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CAPITAL ROA® IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM COUNTY WIDE MEASURE C ROADWAY OVERLAYS AND RECONSTRUCTIONS rF PWOIEARTiNEZ� Q BAY�aa�T Bim. • + PITABURG + ` TIOCH SAN E.soarWM ° PABLO r *CONCORD OAKI PLEASANT KNT RICHMOND FALL CLAYTON BRENTWOOD EL �y • CERRITO C/ 6- DISCOVERY 24, *WALNUT CREEK ®;Y � AFAYETTE GRIND BYRaFI+ • •B4.AS KMWK K MORAGA + DANVILLE r DTY SAN RAMON • CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CALIFORNIA O.Lr. DIrOLAIYlR N,YttYtAFNIt YII.YY.ITIYN NOT TO SCALE LOCATION MAP f4fT[Y/tYYAJJi tOrTYM6 .Ar Yt[t 4f FttYYCf TNif YM. DATE�03-13-97 FILE:Itwltran_en lul lcrl 29.d n �.�x.... .�..I.�..I,�c�.+.. 1-- '14 nnnn 77 PROJECT NAME:County Wide Pavement Management Projects PROJECT LOCATION:Various locations throughout East,West,and Central Contra Costa County. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: An overlay or reconstruction will completely refinish these roads and eliminate the current maintenance problem. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $500,000 annually PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Overlay or reconstruct designated roads throughout the County during the next seven year period. SOURCE OF FUNDING:Local Road Funds Work Order:NIA Sup.District:N/A Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COST in TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. $1,000's DATE 99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 Preliminary Engineering Environmental Design Engineering Right of Way Construction TOTAL 3,500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 78 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CAPITAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM COUNTY WIDE PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROJECTS RDDea. BAYPONT PINOLE ARTINEZ • • CO3 PIT ISBURG • T10CH • SAN a,SOVOMr AKLEY PABLO • •CONCORDANT ° RICHMOND PL HIILLLL BRENTWOOD CLAYTON • EL%%. • CERRITO DIWOVERY 24 *WALNUT CREEK 9AY � !=AAYETTE GRIND . AALAW BYRON • s R ACKMWK x MORAGA DANVILLE a D TY VALLEY SAN RAMON • CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CALIFORNIA O.IJ. OIiaLJ11YlR NIV..Y.T.F LOCATION MAP ......[ NOT TO SCALE fF..Y. Y1. YAF. DATE:03-13.97 FLE:Jbuftran_•n Jar'lari 29.cin .a,... Ka.., no ')AAA 79 '"#„�., � .b r �,ax,•`=' ' , �s �. R sr z- ws �' ..��t�,i , 3.N."1i67 �r.,l. ,,:W�2# I �, r PROJECT NAME:Countywide Safety Investigation PROJECT LOCATION:Potential projects located throughout the unincorporated area of Contra Costa County, PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:Each year safety upgrades to the road infrastructure must be designed and built. These numerous small projects increase the safety of the County's road network. All such projects begin with a safety investigation. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $205,000 per year. PROJECT DESCRIPTION:As a result of safety investigations,necessary improvements to the safety elements of the road infrastructure(i.e.guardrails,removal of roadside obstacles,retaining walls,minor pavement projects, etc.)will be designed and constructed by the Maintenance Division of Contra Costa County Public Works Department. SOURCE OF FUNDING:Road Funds Work Order:0210 Sup.District:NIA Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COST in TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. $1,000's DATE 99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 Preliminary Engineering Environmental Design Engineering 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Right of Way Construction 155 155 155 155 155 155 155 TOTAL 205 205 205 205 205 205 205 80 CONTRA COSTA COUNT' CAPITAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM COUNTY WIDE SAFETY INVESTIGATION RODEO. SAY.POINT 9ETtiEL PINOLE 4 AFtTINEZ� C3 PITABURC • TIOCH SAN EL SOBRANTE PAi LO . •CONCORD ct PLEASANT RICHMOND HILL BRENTWOOD CLAYTON EL CERRITO DSCOVORY 'WALNUT CREEK ®AY �LAFAYETTE ORINDA By1m . e BLA6�OtAN7C MID . DANVILLE DOUGHERTY vmj" SAN RAMON r CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CALIFORNIA 0.1.6. GI6CLAIYiR Ya sY.axarxrc w..aYanax LOCATION MAP .YYT.Y raTo ...V.ML NOT TO SCALE .a0 uam ra raaouea rxo YAf. ATE:03-07-97 FILE=lbu/tran_an Iar'lar 43.d n 1ani1....i Fk.s nr.w\r.ri.<A'S A-- ■A-,, AG ^IAnA 4a=G4.n7 81 ik+� y. yi PROJECT NAME:Countywide Signal Modifications PROJECT LOCATION: At various signalized intersections throughout the County. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: As aging signals develop function problems and upgrading is needed,new parts and additions will need to be installed or replaced. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $50,000 per year PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Modify,replace,and improve traffic signals throughout the County as the need arises. SOURCE OF FUNDING: Road Funds Work Order:4822 Sup.District: NIA Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COST in TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. $1,000's DATE 99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 04105 05/06 Preliminary Engineering Environmental Design Engineering 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Right of Way Construction 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 TOTAL 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 82 • CONTRA COSTA COUNTY • CAPITAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM COUNTY 'NIDE SIGNAL MODIFICATIONS Fwmoo BAY PINOLE ARTINE2 • 4 PIT1'SBURG 4 • TIOCH • SAN OAKLEY PABLO ®`� •CONCORD RICHMOND PLEASANT okwsm CLAYTON BRENTWOOD EL • CERRITO aSCOVY tY u 'WALNUT CREEK BAY GRIND�LA1:AYETTE •ALAAKf SYF4Cll1• MOR WA DANVILLE mamiry VALLEY SAN RAMON CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CALIFORNIA CIA. C:e0w MSR ..— Y.Y[.....Y,a YIWf.."g LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE srse[Y r.a.saY sarrY�.[ YA.u.as ee r.aaus[rYu YN. DAT€:03-11-97 FILE:Jbu/tren_en ler'hr'45.d n t-P a y �1 � PROJECT NAME:Countywide Traffic Betterment:New Signs PROJECT LOCATION: Projects located throughout the unincorporated area of Contra Costa County. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: As traffic conditions change,additional signs are necessary throughout the County. This program provides the funding for these numerous small projects. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $30,000 per year PROJECT DESCRIPTION:This project provides the resources to install traffic signs as the need arises thoughout the year. SOURCE OF FUNDING: Road Funds Work Order:4202 Sup.District:N/A Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COST in TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. $1,000's DATE 99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 Preliminary Engineering Environmental Design Engineering Right of Way Construction 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 TOTAL 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 84 40 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CAPITAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM COUNTY WIDE TRAFFIC BETTERMENT: NEW SIGNS RODEO* ``�.... BAYPONT PINOL ARTINEZ• CJ a ' 4 PIT1'SBURO ; TIOCH SAN EL SODRANTE • •CONCORD .� oEx�EY PABLO • PLEASANT• KMGH'r RICHMOND HILL CLAYTON BRENTWOOD EL%%� ..L ' CERRITO " aMOVERY 94 *WALNUT CREEK 8!Y ORINDA LAFAYETTE r • AL40 BYRON a86ACKWIWK MORAGA DANVILLE e C QTY SAN RAMON CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CALIFORNIA 9 KpLA/MIY YA[FYATI9N LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE l.. Fb99bAY LY/TYM[ bA!Ytlb T9 FF99YLL TNIb YAI. OATE'03-12.27 FIIEI/hu/tran_an/ /ar'5J.d n ..•t Frr.n n..rinrl..ln.i..S.9 A.... Inn i'1 'lf%Ar% 47."Y7.^lii 85 y t PROJECT NAME:Countywide Traffic Betterment:New Striping PROJECT LOCATION: Projects located throughout the unincorporated area of Contra Costa County. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: As traffic conditions change,additional striping is necessary throughout the County. This program provides the fimding for these numerous small projects. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $30,000 per year PROJECT DESCRIPTION:This project provides the resources to install the necessary traffic striping projects as needed during a given year. SOURCE OF FUNDING: Road Funds Work Order:4203 Sup.District: N/A Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COST in TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. $1,000's DATE 99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 Preliminary Engineering Environmental Design Engineering Right of Way Construction 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 TOTAL 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 86 ............. _ _ - CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CAPITAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM COUNTY WIDE TRAFFIC BETTERMENT: NEW STRIPING RODEO. BAY POW BETHEL PINOL ARTINEZ, 0 { PITABURG ; TIOCH SAN Et_Sobimm PABLO • •CONCORD �' PLEASANT 1pjq{1 Sp4 RICHMOND HILL BRENTWOOD • CLAYTON EL ` CERRITO toVERY u `WALNUT CREEK BAY O*IND ALAFAYETTE BYRON At,NAO & . •BL#91QiAwK MORAGA DANVILLE DOUGHERTYV AUXY SAN RAMON . CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CALIFORNIA o.is. o1raLAir.R .YCi.Y[[tl...Y..... ,Y...Y.f,.Y LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE ./CCC.AY i./f WA.6 WAC T./tlC.VC[Tkltl YI.I. DATE!03-12-97 FILEAU/tron_en/cr'/cr'54.d n 1-- 14 ')Ann 87 7 s.,......tt• . PROJECT NAME:Delta Road Bike Lanes Phase III PROJECT LOCATION:Delta Road in Knightsen. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:Provide an alternative transportation mode for the community. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $177,00 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:The project consists of widening the existing roadway to accommodate Class II bike lanes in both directions. SOURCE OF FUNDING:$100,000 TDA Grant,$77,000 Road Funds Work Order:4178 Sup.District:V Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COST in TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. $1,000's DATE 99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 Preliminary Engineering 10 10 Environmental 3 3 Design Engineering 20 20 Right of Way Construction 144 144 TOTAL 177 177 88 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DELTA ROAD BIKE LANE PHASE III � m � A-V PRO ECT PR J W -� IMIT t o LIT E , f D.Li. DISCLAIMER a tl[ttlfMMla Iaf aff.".. tl mMa fW WM 60f MT fYWTLY PfafWLW .ITWAf6 ftl.atlf A.1 All LOCATION &%P WAf aLLtl itl� tlY. iW fW iLtl Y[IaiL OATE:03-07-00 FLE1/iran_en/cri/criplltdgn A— AA— no ')nnn 40.n7.cn 89 I j h tqqqq E X"Y�t j 3 � 6t 4 VE .� i§;y?" jg�N t ! ?y i I� stk. PROJECT NAME:Delta Road Bridge Replacement PROJECT LOCATION:Delta Road in the Knightsen area. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Bridge is eligible for replacement. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST:$900,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Replace existing bridge. SOURCE OF FUNDING:80%HBRR($720,000),20%Road Funds($180,000) Work Order:4216 Sup.District:V Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COST in TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. $1,000's DATE 99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 Preliminary Engineering Environmental 25 25 Design Engineering 135 125 10 Right of Way Construction 740 500 240 TOTAL 900 500 240 90 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CAPITAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DELTA ROAD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT JLI rY � NIP r. �r a ,r r M O rs ae s r w � w C TIO r, s � i Ir I' OCTA 00 r w YY t t .. S r wY + r t 8.1.6 616C6AIYt8 a tsi.F#am YIreFYYTrY LOCATION MAP �[,�T •Ai Yt[t YO FF4W[[TM�t [T$T[Y FFttF YY Cif T i MIC ATE:02-08-00 FLE:/bu/tron_enq/cj/cripl03.dcA ..•1ir+.ra nnni nw.vi nrinl A4 .4-- C—k nO ')AFIA 91 ------------ PROJECT NAME:Eden Plains Road Widening:Sunset Road to Marshall Court PROJECT LOCATION: Eden Plains Road,from Sunset Road to Marshall Court in the Knightsen Area. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:The current road width is not adequate for the anticipated traffic flows. This project will provide a two lane road built to arterial standards. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $250,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen Eden Plains Road to provide two 12-foot lanes and paved shoulders. SOURCE OF FUNDING: Road Funds,Additional funding sources to be identified Work Order:1062 Sup.District: V Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) N` COST COST in TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. S1,000's DATE 99100 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 Preliminary Engineering 10 10 Environmental 5 5 Design Engineering 35 15 20 Right of Way 50 25 25 Construction 150 75 75 TOTAL 250 55 120 75 92' CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CAPITAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EDEN PLAINS ROAD WIDENING SUNSET TO MARSHAL # PRO EC' t YdIrY6 # # t LIMIT # } p a� 9 3.I.i. DI�06AIYif! N..L....VNN NV..YATI.N LOCATION MAP d iitl .dd dp0 .di Idpq/t[i iY.T[Y F.d..w WYYTWAY. WAO Y.dO Tf r...Ydi fNli ' YAi. Yid id. i.0 YilOp DAT 06-17-97 FILE:/bu/tron-eng/crip/crip64.dgn 93 ...E S PROJECT NAME:Evora Road Extension PROJECT LOCATION: North of Highway 4 from Port Chicago Highway to Evora Road. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: To provide an East-West connection between North Concord and Bay Point, ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $9,000,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: To extend Evora Road from existing Port Chicago Highway at Arnold Industrial Highway, SOURCE OF FUNDING: $5,000,000 from Navy,$4,000,000 unfunded. Work Order:4061 Sup.District: IV&V Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COST in TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. $1,000's DATE 99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 Preliminary Engineering 50 50 Environmental 100 100 Design Engineering 600 600 Right of Way 1400 400 1000 Construction 6850 3000 3850 TOTAL 9000 50 100 1000 1000 3000 3850 94 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CAPITAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EVORA ROAD EXTENSION } } t t L#t?JEC i + } YR + } + L1M�T ECT + } + R WAWVMW O.t.b. Di6CWYCl1 YARYTRit .".eta TY+ktoYti taAWYW IYitRYl1Me LOCATION MAP tYtitR WRRRtAY tOrT.AR[ Ao tOt �IeI5-4 YAW. GATE:03.04-9T €I.E=/b./tr. .h•t4«+.» r..�r.l r.rir+t r.r;.,4G.+s... 1+... 44 -Inf%n 4"7�q A.AA 95 r PROJECT NAME: Evora Road Widening PROJECT LOCATION: On Evora Road from Mota Drive to Pomo Street. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The volume of traffic on Evora Road dictates the need to increase the width of this road to provide for four lanes. Also,the safety of this road will be increased by constructing a 16'median island. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $787,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen the existing road to a width of 72'within a 92 foot right of way. SOURCE OF FUNDING: Bay Point Area of Benefit Work Order:4073 Sup.District: V Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COST in TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. r: $1,000's DATE 99/00 00/01 01/02 02103 03/04 04105 05/06 Preliminary Engineering 50 40 10 Environmental 25 25 Design Engineering 75 75 Right of Way 100 65 35 Construction 537 537 TOTAL 787 40 35 140 572 *NOTE:The timing of this project extends beyond the life of this GRIP. 96 -._..._....................................................................... - .. . ............................................................................................. .. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CAPITAL ROAM IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EVORA ROAD WIDENING N {' YA p p ECT `' `---- JECT L NII a.�.a. wsauiraa LOCATION I�1�t■■ /yam a Y[ataAFXm+YroPYAfrox a � � � � �� %Tif[Y FPNiAX aiiTYM[ WAf Y![i Sa FPWaVa[TXI! �a 1M [W Y['IGM YAP. OATS 03 05 97 Fq E lbultran- !cr /ni07,don 1-, 4 k Wnnn 47-'20-^4-^4 9'7 ............ ......... .... 'MINI PROJECT NAME:Highway 4/Sellers Avenue Traffic Signal PROJECT LOCATION: Intersection of Highway 4 and Sellers Avenue in the Oakley Area, PROJECT Jt3STIFICATION: The intersection meets warrants for a traffic signal. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $375,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install a traffic signal and incidental median island and shoulder improvements, SOURCE OF FUNDING: HES funds Work Order:N/A Sup.District: V Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COST in TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. $1,000's DATE 99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 Preliminary Engineering 30 30 Environmental 10 10 Design Engineering 50 50 Right of Way 0 Construction 285 285 TOTAL 375 80 285 98 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CAPITAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM HIGHWAY 4 /SELLERS AVE TRAFFIC SIGNAL + + + + + + LOCT'ION row + + + + + 0.1.4. ONCL IMER •i aisaactue IY/tliYATfaY a fM aW Min iaa Male R[T "`" " ia'"""a LOCATION MAP .AlYiLi TO�ROWaa Fiia YAM. ATE:2 -25-98 FILE:lbultrat_e !a'/crt87.don i.4 n 99 PROJECT NAME: Interstate 80 Bikeway PROJECT LOCATION:Various streets along the Interstate 80 corridor in the West County area. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:The project will provide bicycle lanes from the Rodeo Transit Center in Hercules to the Del Norte Bart station ins El Cerrito. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST:$99,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Re-stripe these roadways to accommodate bicycle lanes and install destination signing. SOURCE OF FUNDING:TFCA Work Order:4112 Sup.District:I Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COST In TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. $1,000's DATE 99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 Preliminary Engineering 6 6 Environmental 3 3 Design Engineering 15 15 Right of Way Construction 75 25 5o TOTAL 99 49 50 100 - ..................................... 66 INTERSTATE 80 BIKEWAY AIRWr ZVI 7W ' t` MON W1%my ,A' t i, A p � `* • Is- pow O V 'gy lltt "•111 �Htr� •*. �IA� l��r'���6���1t►R R t PROJECT NAME: Iron Horse Trail Overcrossing PROJECT LOCATION: Iron Horse Trail at Treat Boulevard in Walnut Creek. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:The bridge will provide a grade separation between traffic on Treat Boulevard and traffic on the Iron Horse Trail,and improve pedestrian and bicycle access to transit services at the Pleasant Hill BART Station. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $2,400,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:This project consists of constructing a bicycle/pedestrian bridge along the Iron Horse Trail alignment crossing Treat Boulevard in the vicinity of Jones Road. SOURCE OF FUNDING:$500,000 TEA 2125%,$1,500,000 Regional Measure C,$400,000 Redevelopment Funds Work Order:N/A Sup.District:III Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COST in TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. $1,000's DATE 99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 Preliminary Engineering 50 40 10 Environmental 10 10 Design Engineering 200 200 Right of Way Construction 2140 1070 TOTAL 2400 40 20 1270 1070 102 l01 r.-v I 016 i IRON HORSE OVERCROSSING Nam idol r 1IN��� �,,, '' ! , r' N PROJECT NAME:Lone Tree Way Widening PROJECT LOCATION:Lone Tree Way from Empire Avenue to O'Hara Avenue. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:Future development in North Brentwood area creates the need for a four-lane arterial standard roadway. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST:$1,750,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Widen the existing road as per the Precise Alignment. SOURCE OF FUNDING:East County Area of Benefit Work Order:N/A Sup.District:V Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COST inTO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. $1,000's DATE 99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 Preliminary Engineering 150 50 100 Environmental 50 25 25 Design Engineering 150 50 Right of Way 350 Construction 1,050 TOTAL 1,750 50 125 75 *NOTE:The timing of this project extends beyond the life of this CRIP. 104 ......................... CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM LONE TREE WAY WIDENING ROJEC + �► + LIMI tROJECT IMIT + + a I + + e a e. o.:.6. moou:rae .aLea.aFYw YW..YaT1.YAll LOCATION MAP iY.TLY irtltlfW faI1YAlF. rat alit T.ffa.ue.Txta tlas. m iia .i.YLTir 7DATE:03-07-00 FL€:/tron_en/er"/crlpl06.dqm ��... a-- iA— na hnnn aa.)r,.ac 105 PROJECT NAME:Loring Avenue Reconstruction PROJECT LOCATION:The intersection of Loring Avenue and Rolph Street in the Crockett area. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:The project will completely reconstruct the roadway and eliminate the current maintenance problem. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST:$134,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Reconstruct the roadway and portions of curb,gutter,and sidewalk. SOURCE OF FUNDING:Measure C funds Work Order:4272 Sup.District:II Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COST In TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. $1,000's DATE 99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 Preliminary Engineering 10 10 Environmental 20 10 Design Engineering 28 28 Right of Way Construction 76 76 TO'T'AL 134 134 106 AL LORING STREET RECONSTRUCTION ■ �a �„ -,,�► "' !MINIM! 111LIN �, � / � 1��l�",�,',�/1 Iii11: �i1111111� i1i11111 111/1111-�i11 t �lliii :111!1 Ii��: � m ..■0i/ilii .,Il ii111i111v1l1111��r ,tel: .ilh! .:// 11111�l11II IIW 1/ w �11111; �1► .� • ■. .■M snip-' / � `, -�'�"`-...� lo gill ► ■Itl1��11��III mann Ifni X11: �,� 1111 :IIg1 � � ■ ��` 111/ Iiia ilii � �'"�► � � ��� .■�� ilil Illi 1111 �' �I' �"�` PROJECT NAME:North Broadway Infrastructure Improvements Phase II PROJECT LOCATION:Suisun,Pullman,Bella Monte,Highway,Crivello,and West Siino Avenues in Baypoint. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:Roadway infrastructure improvements are necessary to revitalize this area. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST:$1,500,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:The project consists of installing storm drain,constructing curb,gutter,and sidewalk,pavement widening,and road reconstruction. SOURCE OF FUNDING:Redevelopment Funds Work Order:N/A Sup.District:V jExpenditures Pro Anticipated p (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COST in TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. $1,000's DATE 99/00 00/01 01/02 02103 03/04 04/05 05/06 Preliminary Engineering 20 20 Environmental 5 5 Design Engineering 50 50 Right of Way Construction 1,425 1,425 TOTAL 1,500 75 1,425 108 NORTH BROADWAY INFRASTRUCTURE---PHASE II__ rn r r • i 006 moAmomr . m w. Q um ,.IF it IPI Cp wNru op. MSELLZ R'' �■�"',, © MI ii(ilinow li ra. ii I wo MIR ...• , PROJECT NAME:North Broadway Infrastructure Improvements Phase III PROJECT LOCATION: Cross streets between Solano,Poinsettia,and North Broadway Avenues in Baypoint. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Roadway infrastructure improvements are necessary to revitalize this area. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $2,000,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project consists of constructing curb,gutter,and sidewalk,pavement widening,and road reconstruction. SOURCE OF FUNDING: Redevelopment Funds Work Order:N/A Sup.District: V Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COST in TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. $1,000's DATE 99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 Preliminary Engineering 20 20 Environmental 5 5 Design Engineering 50 50 Right of Way 1,300 1,300 Construction 625 525 TOTAL 2,000. 75 1,300 625 *NOTE:The timing of this project extends beyond the life of this GRIP. 110 NORTH BROADWAY INFRASTRUCTURE PHASE III PROJECT �►. "M! mow...- � ; '-= ow an iii 7Vi'' ..■.�. .sem- �Mmv a .......�. . �■■. its. ,�.+ Lo mow.I= .a moi: � Warm! �■*"� �MMIW -1=9016 7! ice' ^��i.� _! �'if�■ ��7��1• �.i eel MPIL 'ate„!• � . 'Y��.' t--■�f: ` "'�■.a ii i ! '�■�■: �i� C16 -� i iia. inow �� � BVlm& WIN owl pi ■Iii �' �-�'�► ��'",� [" �V- W, ■.mom ��" r1�. � ,�■ + '"" '.A*v �rl�d�i�1 Al ;.� ."!!Gr�.■a� wrr■��, J� ry a ■., �. > _ ' l '��1�'17E► rte ■., ;;MYi�,., PROJECT NAME:North Richmond Curb Ramps Phase II PROJECT LOCATION:Various locations within the North Richmond Area. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:New curb ramps are required to meet current ADA standards. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $96,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Construct ADA standard curb ramps in various locations. SOURCE OF FUNDING: $30,000 CDBG,$40,000 TDA,$26,000 Measure C Funds Work Order: 4110 Sup.District:I Ebh 8 :a•�. i� ¢� a"5 ` �h' M Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COST In TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. $1,000's DATE 99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 Preliminary Engineering 10 10 Environmental 3 3 Design Engineering 10 10 Right of Way Construction 73 73 TOTAL 96 96 ro , szo , ,. aat x � � ad EAcaMR ink . .B, 112 M'�f►�► NORTH RICHMOND CURB--RAMPS PHASE 11 loll .1. =m11111 ®1l 0 HIM will 111 0111 !illi INC 111 llil pigs 11111 1111 w 1111 1�� �I11 111 1!111 1111 mm No 1111 loll 1117 IIIcmm mum IIIA 111 1111, mum It, rurm mm al !1111 ■11 111■■-■ gggs WIN 11111 11111111111111 '�- �� �■■ r �C 11111111itltt �1111 illi :�� 1111 a m; 111 X11 , -- • • -�-�11!/1!111 Illill�lill /11111111�11'� �'/11111 ""1�1 11111!111 Itiltl � 11111 21 INS C111111111111111I/IIIIC11/ ll/llc w111111m Nillillic ■n-l1/11 11111.�� �111111t111/ � 1i1111� Illl�ll� �t11i11111111111� '=111111� �,Illlll►' �!lIII 1C 1s1111111rm ■■IIIIIi1111111= �111111 .:�_IIII!" .=i �'i11111111� �II111■1� j1i1111111111�� X11111: .'1�1�*`� 11/ �Illllh .1�1111�; ■■1�l11�111/� �Illlill� +�- /��■ �■,'�■�■1� '��■�11■Ili ��t��u �a�m�► �u...�- "'�� ► N PROJECT NAME:North Richmond Improvements—Pittsburgh Avenue Extension PROJECT LOCATION: Pittsburgh Avenue in the North Richmond Area, PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:To provide an East-West connection within the unincorporated area of North Richmond. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $6,000,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:The project consists of extending Pittsburg Avenue from Filbert Street to the proposed 7h Street extension. SOURCE OF FUNDING: $1,000,000 Redevelopment,$5,000,000 unfunded. Work Order:N/A Sup.District:I 3X' Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COST in TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. $1,000's DATE 99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 Preliminary Engineering 50 25 Environmental 3 Design Engineering 200 Right of Way 2,500 Construction 3,247 TOTAL 6,000 d AM, ,. *NOTE:The timing of this project extends beyond the life of this GRIP. 114 NORTH ! 1 IMPROVEMENTS PITTSBURGH AVENUE EXTENSION •any WN 11 ■-+ yaw"' . ��� �� ■ �- nst.+ 4.+i� • � .mss uis� .+iwr. r IN bW a Mad glib uAl uNdi+ ■ �'1 ■r^ ^ter- :cm r hd 4 k lklitd mp LTJilV ® !' i � f PROJECT NAME:North Richmond Improvements—7`"Street Extension PROJECT LOCATION: 7h Street in the North Richmond area. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:To provide a North-South connection within the unincorporated area of North Richmond. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $3,400,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:The project consists of extending 7"'Street from Verde Ave to Brookside Drive. SOURCE OF FUNDING: $400,000 Redevelopment,$3,000,000 unfunded Work Order:N/A Sup.District:I "l sv�,�' % Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) > 4 COST COST in TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. $1,000"s DATE 99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 Preliminary Engineering 50 20 30 Environmental 3 Design Engineering 100 Right of Way 750 Construction 2,497 TOTAL 3,400 *"i Z a u� 3>a�.. - e e }e� � + `�# a.,a .3a»,d a�ll�zd 4,.a�,e ,: .W2 ., o-a a .> r, *NOTE:The timing of this project extends beyond the life of this CRIP. 116 NORTH RICHMOND IMPROVEMENTS EXTENSION7TH STREET f ► Jim,In.FIN �r�► 14 •�'�t iF�ilpll ow Maw or" �- r.wd .ateuiow .a'�rs �r �; ,�"� • � n WTI ri!pi MPI dill �ii�� �u ■�� y��� R&P Lail � 1u1 uu � �7� .asp. t'i�, 5� hudil Js..J ^7�' 3L-I!, -MEL pow -in � ��► .. PROJECT NAME:North Richmond Transportation and Enhancements Phase I PROJECT LOCATION:Third Street from Chesley Avenue to Market Avenue in the unincorporated area of North Richmond. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:The project is need to make the existing transportation system more pedestrian, visually,and economically appealing by constructing streetscape improvements. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST:$583,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:The project includes constructing sidewalks,installing curb ramps,slurry sealing pavement,improving street lighting,constructing median islands with trees and green scape,and restriping Third Street to include bicycle lanes. SOURCE OF FUNDING: TLC Grant,Redevelopment Agency. Work Order:N/A Sup.District:I �. Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COST in TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. $1,000's DATE 99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 Preliminary Engineering 10 10 Environmental 3 3 Design Engineering 52 52 Right of Way Construction 518 1 518 TOTAL 583 10 573 r, 3➢ e�f f ^ a ssp 118 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CAPITAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - NORTH RICHMOND TRANSPORTATION AND ENHANCEMENTS PHASE I WILDCAT CR, , w 'e 1A4 VERDE AVE low rasa Aga y " 9u NNA 4W AW_ to dux Illi U+ N NNi XA am NSM < MM NNNfj an N� NA _ 19� !dW N 1957 llu— NA /m AW My NA `t Nil ep �• lr� TAIJ AM NA Asl A9 AMB ASB A4Strio Aa A+n -NN ff= M4 X:JS NA AN NA AJd Ali A]N Add NA NA ow NA A55 AN2 A5/ AN ffe Affi Aid An XA RVF toil l 8t LVER AVE + A � � � � � � � � � � mw Aw #A AM sa mf NA NA rir xx lax ad% AM lax XvAffJ "ct' x55 ado MCINN+ NA NSI Nk5 �, GROVE AVE f41Alm H $� NA +„ N rA NA ~ -. ASS cn NA RSMI 1- Q:6f! N5d 6M' NA di>B ISM Fg- Q:orAFA B.x am1SlS so m S di59 Be S Q. W4 I NA 0 1Bd9 NA r- aw NSB an 15ffi ffs XA 71 A $ CHESLEY AVE O.I.S. ogOlvro fR W N..WYI[YIYY.TYPY LOCATION MAP YY[Y[Y iq..pY N'ITYAO[ .M W[.T.iYtYW[TYY DATE=1-31-00 FLE,7bu/tran_ crWcripll2 1+ron nnrr\rrinlrrin119 rinn Ind 1'X 7nnn 11.77.711 119 PROJECT NAME:Olympic Boulevard: Left Turn Pocket at Bridgefield Road PROJECT LOCATION: Intersection of Olympic Boulevard and Bridgefield Road in the South Walnut Creek area. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This project will provide a left turn lane on OIympic Boulevard to prevent rear end collisions involving left turning vehicles there. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $200,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen Olympic Boulevard and restripe as necessary to provide a left turn on Olympic Boulevard at Bridgefield Road. SOURCE OF FUNDING: HES($100,000),Central County Area of Benefit($100,000). Work Order:N/A Sup.District: III Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COST in TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. $1,000's DATE 94/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 Preliminary Engineering 20 20 Environmental 15 15 Design Engineering 25 25 Right of Way 20 20 Construction 120 120 TOTAL 200 80120 4a E8� etix i a z s °n �. 3 % a g a a �me x .win i aQ,4 - 4ro t M m 120 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CAPITAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM OLYMPIC BOULEVARD LEFT TURN POCKET AT BRIDGEFIELD ROAD t � 4YY/q 0.0 PROJECT LOCATION D.LJf. DI/OLAINSH ..K...Y.,..M.v.M YAF........�,."""` ��//���_ LOCATION MAP YfN.....f.N.IN.♦M. DA7E,06-*97 FUt/bu/trcn—a /crl/cr 7. nnnn no=an.cr 121 PROJECT NAME:Pacheco Boulevard Overlay Phase I PROJECT LOCATION:Pacheco Boulevard from Martinez city limits to Wygal Drive in the Pacheco area. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:The project is needed to extend the pavement life. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $422,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Overlay the existing roadway. SOURCE OF FUNDING:$300,000 TEA 21,$122,000 Local Road Funds Work Order:4090 Sup.District:II R1.111 ��� 11, Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COST in TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. $1,000's DATE 99/00 80/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 Preliminary Engineering 42 42 Environmental 3 3 Design Engineering 42 42 Right of Way Construction 335 335 TOTAL 422 422 4waB 8h�?E sa !� & NOW l' �a N ie i,. �# e ^#*+Ws;+�, yaya s t N .;; 2 �r.. 122 N. PACHECO BOULEVARD OVERLAY PROJECT INS -��� : LIMIT ,�! ►, ��11���111� o1�111���1111 ■ „' ♦ _ *� X1111 1010 INN ' ;♦♦ C 2 ��� MIN S_L� .mil � •ooh ;!`" �� ��_ = Fq cm cc1 ...'...E MEN ME MINE or MEMm ■■ MIMI we � Rm silt 616NIEMEN Ell ������,�!""' ��.. •�� .�.ii���.��'.� 111 *�i�� � ��.i.��_ .. ���,� �� iii♦ •.., ,� �'� ������,;/����:,�� �11��1► �� �1111111f1: � , `�� ��►�! �■ ■��.,�.� ��': '"�� f� PROJECT NAME: Pacheco Boulevard Overlay Phase 11 PROJECT LOCATION:Pacheco Boulevard from Wygal Drive to Arthur Road in the Pacheco area. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:The project is need to extend the pavement life. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $696,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Overlay the existing roadway. SOURCE OF FUNDING:$600,000 TEA 21,$96,000 Local Road Funds Work Order:N/A Sap.District:IT p , Wvi � s re� r zka$ q'' 4 Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COST In TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. $1,000's DATE 99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 Preliminary Engineering 68 68 Environmental 3 3 Design Engineering 68 68 Right of Way Construction 557 567 TOTAL 696 696 014a s sou aar 124 zielcl PACHECO BOULEVARD OVERLAY ► 11�� � ` *'�-{**► �•► �►�► '�'► �►�►►�'� ♦moi +►:'' . I ■■■■■■ ' *., err !► �..,,'' * , aw ■..• . _ , ' LIMITi��■,� �I1111i1 'J PROJECT NAME:Pacheco Boulevard Overlay Phase III PROJECT LOCATION:Pacheco Boulevard from Blum Road to Second Avenue South. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:The project will completely refinish this road and eliminate the current maintenance problem. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST:$934,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Overlay the existing roadway. SOURCE OF FUNDING: $600,000 TEA 21,$334,000 Local Road Funds Work Order:N/A Sup.District:2 , p 3 , rK, ffi " Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COST in TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. ; $1,000's DATE 99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 Preliminary Engineering 87 87 Environmental 3 3 Design Engineering 100 100 Right of Way Construction 744 744 TOTAL 934 934 pffiJ ,..,Ta. ...aN �g 126 � >s x galls ass! r ;.,111► fill t will► ��Bill T1 s ALow . r /ttttttt +� mom ��!���/Mttt�Rlt// � ��' 1,i��Mt iii ��'����►�►�'�►� I��� '� ��' #� � �� its i � wsi ���,► i� ,. F � �` . �„ 1►+1►`Ix ► *#r. Orsi #i#s ��w' •,• ■1 Won Cm CC wk Ins oil �■ ■�'ti, 1'► ,� ria#. .... ss s�`t�i!!!! ---�/ "` ,�, .. NOW Mm ,�� �� �I#s Eses•sss ss #s�`-<s ,- _ r �� , u I �t!!�` !�s s## s■ ws ss ■�lt��I■ ����11111��.a�l 7 �' � !!� � i �►,,�► „� ter►�'.,'El�111111,'��1!� t�runm�► �,,.� .'=� � ;�••'t ■1� , .�'� s� ■sem Z���ra�1���4"�,.. -. 1.," *�, PROJECT NAME:Pacheco Boulevard/Second Avenue Traffic Signal PROJECT LOCATION:Intersection of Pacheco Boulevard and Second Avenue in the Pacheco area. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The intersection meets warrants for a signal. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $195,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install a traffic signal. SOURCE OF FUNDING: Local Road Fund(75%),City of Pleasant Hill(25%) Work Order.4177 Sup.District: 11 a . r €t Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COST in TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. $1,000's DATE 99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 Preliminary Engineering 10 10 Environmental 5 5 Design Engineering 25 25 Right of Way Construction 140 140 TOTAL 180 40 140 MN 177 Lam IN$ EN TO =, R; w 128 PACHECO BLVD /SECOND AVE TRAFFIC SIGNAL ■ Zi. lim � No Ulm w WR waamam ..a oil Fes,,;: �,;,..�. � ' �► Y� �IIIif11�11 uu�m E� Amo ■� 1�� 11* llf� 1 fff � +►� ff f*'f *f�/j aft/ tM/ fffl plo N p ............. PROJECT NAME:Pacheco Boulevard Realignment Phase I PROJECT LOCATION: Pacheco Boulevard in the Pacheco area. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The design speed of the existing curves needs to be upgraded. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $4,100,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Reconstruct the existing undercrossing of the railroad tracks per the approved Precise Alignment. SOURCE OF FUNDING: Martinez Area of Benefit(50%),Tosco/Solano Transportation Mitigation Fund (50°l0) Work Order:N/A Sup.District:II I lIft a Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COST in TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. _ $1,000's DATE 99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 05106 Preliminary Engineering 85 25 40 20 Environmental 15 is Design Engineering 450 300 150 Right of Way 450 50 400 Construction 3,100 13,100 TOTAL 2,000 25 355 220 400 3,100 V 9 i ��e. �E•. >ag.. � tR� 130 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CAPITAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PACHECO BOULEVARD REALIGNMENT + PROJECT LOCATION s" + + + + i.l.i. bll16LAIY�i Xi.[iMMNN Nfli[YAYY,N , , LOCATION MAP i "' '~ M [ii ilii[Y M[NAN iiYY[NI[ YY Y[[i ra[iiwa[sXliYB Y[TiNi YIJ�. ATE103-06-$7 FLEi/bu/trin_ w / 34. 96.+... ..wswlw..lcal..rl.a•]A A-- \A— n7 ')nnn iq-4A.gr 131 ......... ......... ......_.............. PROJECT NAME:Parker Avenue Reconstruction PROJECT LOCATION:Parker Avenue from I"Street to California Street in Rodeo. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:Heavy truck traffic along Parker Avenue has left the pavement in poor condition. This project will provide a new,durable structural section. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $3,100,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Remove existing pavement and base on Parker Avenue and construct a new structural section. Replace pavement markers and striping. Install frontage improvements. SOURCE OF FUNDING:Redevelopment funds($100,000),Rodeo/Crockett Transportation Improvement Fund($3,000,000) Work Order:4215 Sup.District:II Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COST ' in TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. $1,000's DATE 99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 Preliminary Engineering 20 20 Environmental 3 3 Design Engineering 152 152 Right of Way Construction 2,725 2,725 TOTAL 3,100,000 23 152 2,925 ,� a - ad 3 ,,; .�r 101 ��e �S s u u 6t, `� @ tr� 3�€ r k t eS, s 132 to}s + .�'R. PARKER AVE RECONSTRUCTION t Lit t �! !�!!� ,, �►�rrr,l ren ... -*„' •" 111! WA �i► 111.■ X11 ��' .��► -� �„ .! 1!i► �hiill/:�r �1/ll��u�J�1!1t' ,� ,r�i�, low P.- .• yyt .� Zw=; on liom mm •�• Wit_ „!, tiles .. ka ;;gm • 111: � 40 1-4 OF .... ............................................................. PROJECT NAME: Parr Boulevard Widening and AC Overlay PROJECT LOCATION: Parr Boulevard between the Richmond Parkway and SPRR in the unincorporated area of North Richmond. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:To provide the roadway capacity necessary for the development of North Richmond. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $2,400,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen and overlay the roadway. SOURCE OF FUNDING: Measure C(54%),Road Funds(30%),Redevelopment funds(13%),and North Richmond Area of Benefit(3%). Work Order:N/A Sup.District: I , Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) InCOST COST in TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. $1,000's DATE 99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 Preliminary Engineering 40 40 Environmental 125 125 Design Engineering 150 150 Right of Way 385 385 Construction 1,700 1,700 TOTAL 2,400 40 X275 385 1,700 ,6 a w � vs IF 134 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CAPITAL LOAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PARR BOULEVARD WIDENING AND AC OVERLAY PRO INtQ 11 �•"'� + + + tT �r GJA. DISCLAIMER w x.xrw wrxY.n.. 7.R e w w w w r rsr Y_fk LOCATION MAP ru Yx.n s..xx rw YN. w YiIO. A7E183-07-Q7 FLENbu/tran...En er / 37. Wan ena\criD\crin37.dan Jul. 13.2000 11:24:18 135 PROJECT NAME:Pleasant Hill Road/Taylor Boulevard Realignment PROJECT LOCATION: At the separation of northbound Pleasant Hill Road and Taylor Boulevard near Walnut Creek. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:The realignment is a safety measure to reduce the numbers of accidents and improve driver comfort. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $3,500,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:The project will realign the existing reversing curves on northbound Pleasant Hill Road at its separation with Taylor Boulevard. SOURCE OF FUNDING: Central County AOB,Road Funds Work Order:NIA Sup.District:IV ' Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) m amCOST COST in TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. $1,000's DATE 99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 Preliminary Engineering 150 50 100 Environmental 100 50 50 Design Engineering 150 50 100 Right of Way 750 500 Construction 2,350 TOTAL 3,500 50 100 100 150 500 U� ..33_z ,,.r,:�., ..r,'• *NOTE:The timing of this project extends beyond the life of this GRIP. 136 ir. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CAPITAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PLEASANT HILL 1 TAYLOR BLVD. REALIGNMENT rFs EC + ow ro p 4 0 ®.�.r. oaa�airee Yt vage To "W"Tme LOCATION MAP T� tViT[Y MHYM tKTYMi •M Ytit T8�iMYM YMit YY. Mt YtR11 ATN03-07-87 FLE;/bu/tra�*n/crlar 39. a 4n nnnn no.on.ee 137.. PROJECT NAME:Pomona Street Pedestrian Widening PROJECT LOCATION: On Pomona Street between Crockett Boulevard and 2"°Street in Crockett. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:No area is presently available for pedestrians to walk along this stretch of roadway. This area is also in front of John Swett High School and will provide access to the school for students. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $125,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Widen the existing roadway to provide a shoulder area for pedestrians to pass safely. SOURCE OF FUNDING: Hercules/Rodeo/Crockett Area of Benefit Work Order:N/A Sup.District: 11 4J > WIN KIN i Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COST in TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. $1,000's DATE 99/00 00101 01/02 02/03 03/04 04105 05106 Preliminary Engineering 10 1 10 Environmental 10 10 Design Engineering 15 15 Right of Way 15 is Construction 75 25 50 TOTAL 125 20 55 50 a € &gay a M SN € sror 138 POMONA PEDESTRIAN 1 r 910 29 is long ill !1A1111 �M, •�;�11:' � E���,,��11#111; 11111 11#1111 /11 1111 ■t11 11 111 ! .1111: 111111111 #111111 '��► / ;:: � : lllt,! ..1r � 1!/1/NI1111111/�1Ifni rAMEN on NXII,�`�'1►,, ,,� �' If WE 1�►*��, IN. 012d 1111111.01 If 311: 111 ��-.•.."11.. 111: .111 11' • ` �11�1111 1111 1111 'x:11 ��1!■ ��. 1111 .1111 _� 11111111 111 �` �► �M +■�� /Ili 1111 1 1 � �� ��'` "��` ■ 1111 11#1 �► ' i 1111 1111 1111 '��' ,�!► ♦ ►' PROJECT NAME:Port Chicago Highway Improvements PROJECT LOCATION:Port Chicago Highway between Pacifica and McAvoy Road PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:Improvements are needed to accommodate bicycle traffic and safe passage of motor vehicles. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $167,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Pavement Widening and intersection improvements. SOURCE OF FUNDING:Bay Point Area of Benefit,Redevelopment Funds Work Order:4130 Sup.District:V �o Nx 13 Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COST in TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. $1,000's DATE 99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 Preliminary Engineering 5 5 Environmental 3 3 Design Engineering 11 5 6 Right of Way Construction 148 81 67 TOTAL 1 167 10 90 67 04 140 PORT IMPROVEIVIENTS MR���� �� inow Mm "sirwnw. -.r ,mFm imRw rr ism iME Lor 60 "Mm"r .,Mr mor tfmr ma "M i+ - in 'nor 7r "fir 7r rwi.l .�,.{ � -am MMIL now MML Mar "j.r Mr •wr ^ter -=a. .aa .ter it imm .wr ^�r� "M wr mss- -ter nmr .�r/iR, �► .+.r .ter .air rr sr -�rlt :r►�► "mow" ^ter =r "Imago st .ate. .MM. aMML. .==, .Mar zc:r ",wr cwr� mow" -M a 7 .zz: .=0 .MMW == -mgr. a "r•r. -ter 3wr, 'lor, ^ter .mm .0 .OR it �r i rw Lm ` 117 '7A!60 "' , ';` 7 '�f97 11Pft1Al 6-4 LAM ` fir � � ,� efr 'i'' yf" v `1��,�► W ` M n. it is . � r ► !1 �. PROJECT NAME: San Pablo Dam Road Overlay Phase I PROJECT LOCATION: San Pablo Dam Road from Tri Lane to Inspiration Point trail head in the San Pablo area.. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:The project is needed to extend the pavement life. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $706,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Overlay the existing roadway. SOURCE OF FUNDING:$600,000 TEA 21,$106,000 Local Road Funds Work Order:4090 Sup.District:I 2 Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COST in TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. $1,000's DATE 99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 05106 Preliminary Engineering 40 40 Environmental 3 3 Design Engineering 88 88 Right of Way Construction 575 575 TOTAL 705 40 666 RIO `=3 WeR aye, atx 142 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CAPITAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT SAN PABLO DAM ROAD OVERLAY PHASE 1 J T PROJECT LIMIT 0.1.5. 014CLAINER w',� 'WTWM" LOCATION MAP >� '� w vrvrxv svwmlx xxA.� v�u xxsr»rx�nws sxw ATE904-20-00 FILEi/bu/tean_&n/er /ct 114. A-r. A— 7A 11AAA 4A.44.'W% 143 t' • d PROJECT NAME: San Pablo Dam Road Overlay Phase II PROJECT LOCATION: San Pablo Dam Road from Wildcat Canyon Road to Inspiration Point trail head in the Orinda area. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:The project is needed to extend the pavement life. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $656,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Overlay the existing roadway. SOURCE OF FUNDING:$580,000 TEA 21,$76,000 Local Road Funds Work Order:NIA Sup.District:I Ile Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COST in TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. $1,000's DATE 99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 Preliminary Engineering 64 64 Environmental 3 3 Design Engineering 64 64 Right of Way Construction 525 525 TOTAL 656 656 s 144 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CAPITAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM SAN PABLO DAM ROAD OVERLAY PHASE 11 SAN P LO .LtMiEGT Ole— DoH �b E�Nti�ECT t.l.t, bItQ6AlIMt1U YY NltY11YMt YviWATpY [yam]`{�� ■M■j`{�/t f YM NY YM IIY MY!Rrt YNTYY l91YYYpo iNTI Tw LOCATION .'YT{t 9Y itfl1M YY YYYY H YYNYYY TYYI oarE=e 2q ao t lbu/trw-wWcrb/crbngpj ng A-- A— ')A nnnn filt•r1'i-tri 145 PROJECT NAME: Sidewalk Gap Closure Project PROJECT LOCATION:Various locations within the County. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:This project is needed to provide pedestrian and mobility impaired access to schools and public transit bus stops. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $335,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:This project consists of constructing sidewalk,curb,retaining walls,and pavement widening. SOURCE OF FUNDING: $300,000 TDA Grant and$35,000 Local Road Funds Work Order:N/A Sup.District:NIA p a 9 f Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) WCOST COST in TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. $1,000's DATE 99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 Engineering 33 33 Environmental 3 3 Design Engineering 33 33 Right of Way Construction 266 266 TOTAL 335 33 302 p �k� .0 146 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CAPITAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM SIDEWALK GAP CLOSURE PROJECT rF- RODEO. 3 SAY FONT SETHEL PINOLE ARTINEZ` 4 5 PITYSBURG + ` TIOCH SAN EL$OB(mM PACHEOO• PABLO (17 PLEASANT `CONCORD OAKLEY RICHMOND HILL BRENTWOOD � EL CLAYTON `CERRITO oMDVERY 2 'WALNUT CREEK SOY �LAFAY TTE ORINOA • SYRON• • .GLACKHMK K MORAGA DANVILLE D QTY SAN RAMON LEGEND 1 EL SOBRANTE AREA 2 WALNUT CREEK AREA 3 BAY POINT AREA 4 5 PACHECO AREA CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CALIFORNIA O.L.. 81.OLAIY.R Y.fL..YifYlf Y..fY". LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE iTfTL.FitMi"Y fNPYML Y#Yfi.T.!i.{YYL TMIf Y#. ATE,05-08-00 fILEt/b,/trw /a /c 296.8 i• n. sas a. .J-- RA— no nnnn i&.o,7.ne 147 PROJECT NAME:State Route 4/Byron Highway Intersection Improvements(Phase 2) PROJECT LOCATION: At the intersection of Byron Highway and SR 4 west of Discovery Bay. PROTECT JUSTIFICATION: High Speed and volume of traffic will make two lanes in each direction necessary through the intersection. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST:$673,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen the existing pavement to provide two lanes in each direction. SOURCE OF FUNDING: Discovery Bay Area of Benefit(33%),Caltrans(67%) Work Order:NIA Sup.District:V s c 11, 00 T5-OM � a�3a3 xr Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COST in TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. $1,000's DATE 99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 Preliminary Engineering 15 10 5 Environmental 15 5 10 Design Engineering 60 30 30 Right of Way 0 Construction 583 TOTAL 673 10 10 40 30 0 *NOTE:The timing of this project extends beyond the life of this GRIP. 148 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CAPITAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM STATE ROUTE 4 /EYRON HIGHWAY c- INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS : PHASE 2 + + + i Ilr• V EMU& + + + + t No. ul ANN o.M.i. aucu�ree IN eoirRY'MF IIRMYATNR LOCATION MAP # 'lE~b7ultm-. Rnnr pft a nrrrars raR ron Tr p"Robt I" �/ 82. AYE-2-24-98 149 PROJECT NAME:Stone Valley Road/Danville Boulevard Intersection Improvements PROJECT LOCATION:At the intersection of Stone Valley Road and Danville Boulevard in Alamo. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The capacity of the intersection needs to be improved and upgraded to handle the projected traffic movements. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,200,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct a right turn only lane from northbound Danville Boulevard onto eastbound Stone Valley Road. Additional geometric changes will be made by widening the entire intersection and adding additional left tum lanes. Also,modify the existing traffic signal to reflect the geometric changes in the intersection. SOURCE OF FUNDING: Alamo Area of Benefit,Possible Federal Grant Work Order:N/A Sup.District: III Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COST in TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. $1,000's DATE 99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 Preliminary Engineering 50 10 40 Environmental 25 10 15 Design Engineering 75 75 Right of Way 100 50 50 Construction 950 950 TOTAL 1,200 10 50 140 50 950 ¢u 3 g WYa ..!�. r rsa ,�. -b 1°'P^. ,�N x^11,e ,. 150 2�=E � ................................ ...................................... PROJECT NAME:Stone Valley Road Improvements:High Eagle Road to Roundhill Road PROJECT LOCATION: Stone Valley Road in the Alamo Area PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The current section of Stone Valley Road is inadequate to accommodate bicycles and the high traffic volumes anticipated on the road. This project will bring the road to County standard. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $127,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Widen the existing roadway between High Eagle Court and Roundhill Road to provide two 12 foot travel lanes and two 5 foot asphalt concrete shoulders. SOURCE OF FUNDING: Alamo AOB Work Order:N/A Sup.District: III H Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COST in TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. $1,000's DATE 99/00 00101 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 Preliminary Engineering 12 12 Environmental 5 5 Design Engineering 14 14 Right of Way 0 Construction 96 96 TOTAL 127 31 96 152 i CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CAPITAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM STONE VALLEY ROAD IMPROVEMENTS HIGH EAGLE ROAD TO ROUNDHILL ROAD + r� VAUT LIMITECT •a.a. meoutrer Yr usnuYrr wrrY�iuY LOCATION MAP r w w w w Arw ee[r [Yr}LY lrrNW ri1}YY[ YW Lrsr ib lrWYst ixn w YCPf1i Y1W. T`002`Z7'®7 �I�1/trQ� oP Iof 03, 1-- 4) nnnn nn'90.4) 153 PROJECT NAME:Stone Valley Road Improvements:Roundhill Road to Glenwood Court PROJECT LOCATION: Stone Valley Road,Alamo PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:The current section of Stone Valley Road is inadequate to accommodate bicycles and the high traffic volumes anticipated on the road. This project will bring the road to County standard. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: 51,023,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Widen the existing roadway between Roundhill Road and Glenwood Court to provide two 12-foot travel lanes and two 5-foot asphalt concrete shoulders. SOURCE OF FUNDING:Alamo Area of Benefit Work Order:NIA Sup.District:ffi 11023 Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COST in TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. $1,000's DATE 99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 Preliminary Engineering 52 52 Environmental 5 5 Design Engineering 55 55 Right of Way 258 255 Construction 653 653 TOTAL 1,023 370 653 10 ,a l•,� 9e1 � 4, .r x .a ;n ec 154 �qo++v►,. STONE VALLEY ROAD IMPROVEMENTS ROUNDHILL ROAD TO GLENWOOD COURT VIEW IN" IRA ► ► WAdK # ♦ ► 'fir* ��►,:' �� +�' �►��'"'r►r��,��r�� �� �►�'' ` fih ON � L owl fj M ................................. ......... . ................................ . / PROJECT NAME:Taylor Boulevard Overlay PROJECT LOCATION:Taylor Boulevard from Pleasant Hill city limits to Pleasant Hill Road in the Pleasant Hill area. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:The project is needed to extend the pavement life. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST:$1,530,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Overlay the existing roadway. SOURCE OF FUNDING:$600,000 TEA 21,$930,000 Local Road Funds Work Order:N/A Sup.District:11 Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COST in TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. $1,000's DATE 99100 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 Preliminary Engineering 60 60 Environmental 20 50 Design Engineering 100 100 Right of Way Construction 1,350 1,350 TOTAL 1,530 1,530 ' x r ��' ao�,;' Bei, N a mss _• - 156 TAYLOR BOULEVARD OVERLAY R 7w�� �� . • - alio imp I Mogul �''�♦ � *, 4,;LFIng ( '� ♦ �'�►` #'�►Air 'Moo I slow va ILI './ MAN► ___ * * .�► ` ��",��/w!l■/ '• �/� /E�1► iii `! "�► ',, s"� •* �l�+r'! , ::VAI#11: .■■■1 Ji i � OIL still I 1 � ,i1►am ILW lit MWAFM WIN wMw mom ■w an un Skam err �� ►��► 1► , �„�/ ■■ ■� ,�.�► ; �./� ■ �,� 1�,,, ���► ��,� 'Iii /�.'�`�. `,,::'���"�' .1*.� PROJECT NAME:Third Street/Goodrick Avenue Realignment PROJECT LOCATION:Goodrick Avenue and Third Street between the City of Richmond to the north and Brookside Drive to the south in the unincorporated area of North Richmond. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:The project will provide efficient circulation in the area. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,881,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Widen and realign Goodrick Avenue or Third Street to provide north-south circulation with only one intersection with Pan:Boulevard. SOURCE OF FUNDING: N.Richmond Area of Benefit. Work Order:N/A Sup.District:I Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COST in TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. $1,000`s DATE 99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 Preliminary Engineering 78 40 38 Environmental 50 50 Design Engineering 300 150 Right of Way 150 Construction 1,416 TOTAL 1,994 40 38 200 11-11,11 owl *NOTE:The timing of this project extends beyond the life of this GRIP. 158 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CAPITAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM THIRD STREET 1 GOODRICK AVENUE REALIGNMENT MAN AW PROJECT � LOCATION O ION A Np N OPTION B AW pmo ow a LEE 4.1.8. OgCLAINER YY nw 1* wrw`YxTYw LOCATION MAIC [T[T[Y M[[Ynif i[IRYN[ YY YNi Ts rY[w[[Tw[ YAr. DAM03-12-47 FLE4bultron_in! Ju 52. 1tran rtnn ti it i 4 2nnn i i•7A.An 159 .................. PROJECT NAME:Treat Boulevard Overlay PROJECT LOCATION:Treat Boulevard from Walnut Creek Channel to Buskirk Avenue in the Walnut Creek area. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:The project is needed to extend the pavement life. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $689,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Overlay the existing roadway. SOURCE OF FUNDING: $600,000 TEA 21,$89,000 Local Road Funds Work Order: NIA Sup.District:IV giag- F,11411'11 Z, mlw Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COST In TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. $1,000's DATE 99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 Preliminary Engineering 50 50 Environmental 3 3 Design Engineering 85 85 Right of Way Construction 551 551 TOTAL 689 689 160 TREAT OULEVARD Y OVERLAY �` ` ''' Wil# i�►�'�'�,�►�'� � �►.����'I�" NEI f :31111 ,ter ��' �•� �►�. �► �i,��.. ME _.... ,IVY PROJECT NAME:2000 Bridge Retrofits PROJECT LOCATION:Various locations within the County. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:These bridges require seismic retrofitting. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST:$489,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Seismic retrofit these bridges. SOURCE OF FUNDING: 88%HBRR, 12%State Funds Work Order:4217 Sup.District:II Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COST In TOF.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. $1,000's DATE 99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 45/06 Preliminary Engineering 5 5 Environmental 10 10 Design Engineering 100 100 Right of Way Construction 374 374 TOTAL 374 4$9 162 ��,.�� �♦�,�, •tttttt�t ;.� 2000 BRIDGE RETROFITS .•��''� 111 „ •��.��« , �, ul 2 � laws a� i �� 111 {111► t i�` fl1%i �tn ,rr/�' .XXX w;„ • .,,1. � ill. ....., Sm �r 411 ..,•: '�� #`"f�1 w�" A ii 111�M ;a1ow 1111�1► ww am OMM . 1XX yXa ya�X lo iWa we �. �* � aIXXaXXMr � ��ra.;�, r ,. •,�,,�.. �►1 . rrl " • , A MENEM PROJECT NAME:2001 Bridge Retrofits PROJECT LOCATION:Del Monte Drive in the San Pablo Area. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:This bridge requires seismic retrofitting. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST:$150,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Seismic retrofit this bridge. SOURCE OF FUNDING: 100%HBRR Work Order: 4217 Sup.District:I Mom 1 El ME �� Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COST In TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. $1,000's DATE 99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 05106 Preliminary Engineering Environmental 3 3 Design Engineering 47 47 Right of Way Construction 100 100 TOTAL 150 150 164 ..:......,,-...,...+.uuscc«;n+...+.w�...-.,..,..,.,. ...vr: :.,..........::�:::--::.:..:::::.:::..>;;r..:.;...........:•...:,,.-. -�., :v...;.-.......-..y. ......:. ......y..,..w.:........s.<.r..>......x--.we..w.s+.. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CAPITAL ROACH IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2001 BRIDGE RETROFITS �r LO ATR N his ham' a.i.a. aisci.airew LOCATION MAP srsrw YY«YY svrnrt« YFY.«.re nYYM«rN1s YFP. iM Y61lO ATE,05-0 -00 FU:/bu/trap an cr Jer 118.d 44..i1....f♦L...,+.t..i...i..1+10,1,... .A..., Aa '1/tn/i 4R•A-4.'3P1 165 PROJECT NAME:Valley View Road Reconstruction and Slide Repair PROJECT LOCATION:Valley View Road from Amend Way to D'Avilla Way in the El Sobrante area. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:The project will repair a past slide problem and completely reconstruct the roadway to eliminate the current maintenance problem. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST:$621,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Reconstruct the roadway and construct new curb,gutter,and sidewalk. SOURCE OF FUNDING:Measure C Funds Work Order: 4274 Sup.District:I Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COST In TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. $1,000's DATE 99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 Preliminary Engineering 88 88 Environmental 3 3 Design Engineering 100 100 Right of Way Construction 430 430 TOTAL 621 621 166 RECONSTRUCTIONVALLEY VIEW ` SLIDE7 , ■ REPAIRBRAMw R.W., MENIMMIN 17V CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CAPITAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM WEST STREET RECONSTRUCTION CAqaAWEZ MAT a PROD U~ PR JEI% > LIMIT n R POO" or pamom nam ar t ar W1J I�LL1 B< it ZI amwe 9fuu ® EE w I ` ROid o.\.�. 016alAINIR ersW..e...ar.xt—*"ATM ,�,, . LOCATION MAP a m a» m m rev rx....v.snvvre W.v.n es I——txw x.x. • ib YRiN ATE:04-24-00 FLE%/bultrar_en/ !ar 12L \...... ..,.,,,\....:..{...:..i+'fi A-- A— -)A 7rir5ri in-AA-CA 169 w po ►'AR WILLOW PASS ROAD OVERLAY PHASE I � �/11111�111111111I<�+ Sol 11111111,�,♦�111111111111111�,A MINOR Iris ■R���t���� ��'�► ..♦� } ! s .nit►�►��''��4��,►'�*+�i��'���*�'��� �"` 11,/���� C Olp logo IN 10 • INS JECT IT PROJ:_ LIMIT w I ♦ !r' A W- �� �� �� .�_w �.�'� = � �� Itll Ililil - � ���{ice- ��It��♦�� � �� FIREMAN= mm 11111 r, ww w_ ,�„'�: �1111�1I11111��"�� :.� moi■ ��'��t1�„���.� . �".� ►� N_ MIR I�i11i�11iR11Fi1� - ,� 1 �i�fi ��//l/�i�+l� 111111111111111111111111111�����"""�" � � WILLOW PASS • i OVERLAY PHASE rriiwlt Ftnnirai riwriw wii�,tr.umtFtrt iii ■■ arrr�■ iirrw ii■ ■ant. sri �'����' ■■ ■.�..' allot .rN. ■ 4 1/1" ■■ ■■ WAS" .a.. �'r.1"' ■ �i ■� is ia.r, ... s1��■ m•� �..�wrr�r ..w. ����I Ftp tirti wiin.; rtr•n (ti•tFttt� tirwtrlF i�;��.���.. aFr�iF rFFtt�rtttt� Fr�ii�, i rirtttttwt- rw��� wri FFFi rrrtrFrrttut iftrrn� rrr�,■!!!!'!!!!!l,+ir�r rrswr lllllti Fti- iriN r1•mtrr• ttwIMFi► m�mrr' writ /�I is t 1l�F� irr arras �"r! NJ M. INV ��.� F ..art r�rr FFtrTt'TC' »• ata •Fr r r".r tra rr �1 ■o oa. art INos� �� ;�� w: ■ a�ttr ■ter /gym w"' �w '!"F am MMMmwm ■ ► � ► 1► t�� i �iCm 1111# ■ ■� ■ !►fir► � ���� � +mem■ .. ��4�tnl7lr/�.� i ������ ��,.�� mart ii ii i` ���� ■�■ rwwa iwr i+ ■, � 1■� '►►•• * ► ►, = MINIM! �►.x.111 ■I MON i arli ii i •�.■ � ■li i�llr SEC'T'ION III Appendices 175 Appendix A: County Road Improvement Policy 177 xwm-v,or StMIx$tv2$xjM,- t may it x" MjXjid Raga xt(ar) or Rscaaaaar mdatt,on(s) A BAckground rr �.�t at� Ca�alT�Ey fid.�a1�R,lfaw :���� a�eai t#�baLCt thq . xic 1�rks eor aauui taxa Birr' +�� Cara�tti�tiitg► C►e*�aio�a:Rant to �rtart �a�►a'iaep,iz� tA�e- tva yaear crs�t.�r �asd mat Pxoa�ra'i� iar:t�wa �r>e:c+�i'dr,>varti�or► iaRt � a�ax th+e 14a�Ojr91 t�.saaaal yeta�t • bud" •: �9" jub]:ic Works anAitay D*v*la ra m,,C.ar%Mff t1as 1 ill .aa notdod o the ray ,Road Moro as"t proal A ,sl. it.pere ne e Vbut'dy ,3a dovou to �r th`s'`dovel p Ont a t thr .a:axa,+� m . r cosu COMWEY. old ftogra*. f a,,oUnty Road 20proVen eat 7Pra>pm (C=) is al+eeded far the �`oi1�,r+rrtsacd'ae� . i. no 4rowth t baa of VA&S x* "C" r*w res each varacdVatito least aq ► to dwmlop a Cko ttx han'690114:tit A o"Oral P2.aae to be . in t-be develoRauent rwi*v �r� wo to de"acv at va' Year CRXV to Ikewt &ad ar ikintain ftuftia U rvicis arA 1%rforaaaana s Standards. tit Scard, Vat ate, . atm ss 1 IrWAZO 20 ba I p7t 14, Attested low,ft1j. Div.I Tromso dom. 19 ., *at panty Adzinistrator Tut SOMW polio,*Wks Wren:for or at ty ftvouppaat e 7 20 *W40 rte"`'dS 'C U4 tom► C 0M, ,COUM. CUXPMWTA Adapted OU, 63i dir,44 Ait $'40,',it ii by the to7.7.arlvift 96tal � ,t �"Y#,a�tlCaf .F�71FM�'1b« �r<k� aek'r MaliAk`.. �I'ncTa►lt�►h' XbrS t VOM ANUTI wow, YEA w� s *MU I* astba a ty Road r t a+o 4py. OuLdt the 4*V*; t of than Ci tTO dO*tA- �rey>itoad Program two) as authorised, by dovenment code putCat:3on $4002 a the ttra htaanaR as at►t s3�+ eett of tis +Mara► � vraheportsti on Improvement. . and .GXV,&h Ow"' o"kat pro"" otdinMW#td by titre VOUrt Jm t(ov er ttandaar,��ti+ao�i i�ba�t�le)t�) aot R�3tortaiaa ]Cnvirrsoaaauea�l triaality � {��► !.t a �rrit.� �se�rtai�ty r t�a� is ► °o� ti!' ear, aKw�, e+� '�` iyarr�t � t�#rl�caal�E�raA tlas sppr►l a* of sftvisar� MW and WMAIM as i'*Uowst V"4: atopa a �C 1A toe, Past haus + axaoA' �a a1i3le 1 is" of rdttitsaa seri: i lii t andtats *iiid"; is i s jr at a rats: of to :i ll 4*U ;a yI*R r. %fi"ia "J�wr�n Auw tram yssolive tax only p�ridas amt t aft tlw �itui to Adee�u f*4 maintain the Cavi 's o. WW4 system. zot �as° mar ar+<�tasrtially the �tY of lut in �ai►t�caaa arta ,g*UAty. 44 Sh" vXb*&. tvatg,$A �i rsar aaln"d rar�tes ,t*o Air quality of > amtoa , azar zses ►s, E.` " twt�. the iC ,� a~+a iitl 1M aRiiG ra too**- it o '" 3sors. s +a7lyr i ,tom- oiw t�►+a of ai traaa it darer, the, ptt ice, a e' .Otato that';W10, # 1! •ar ;effort +0 soft iif too` ab�fw itfi+ 09ftUft spat &i** tOr IDMIL atrrrsta and am awailty i� era�a► acalrr ot."" is tCo aaorra�t aa�tiftaq � iutehsarce; 7. �a�t RX09M, of Massur* "C" 'muirsix ,rich tirr4 l004 *9040Y to d*v*Xot); a O� Xaisagement its 41WM7 I )►l.an he Applied to the devs;Xojpmrnt Ov 1`9A# a ld data Opo & t'jVe y4wr CRZV to 1[+Ilet as1r or lop"Mtatn "h'9ca�a�'irit aaa%VIViO* and wrir+armwsos Standards, B. The 1!!90 ftA ft* Auld tboroughtare, prelim► of tbe, ftar~rd of 04pM VO s Irovirts lwv dive'lopment to mitigate trsiiric , �. f!lats�uro � " fRovern>r+e �iia�ritftoaE I* A mflhiaAM ;drd aam lewri of 143000 00 a year for road. Bitot" and, haaiii aUote p'jife a *Ct& lriy fr�r�ds i'x:m gaesealine tom, f aural WA a is grants. 2, Reagmatrogtian of City setas. Vii. >otabtbft ithatian of Co my roads. 4» Uttfic oon#estian relief of iarobles Vhi,ch eacitted be w Nowex6tr',loss. Ptiority I$tieeli be givftm .to low expert system rAOIAgaent of IF :sioou, am * MiiM i C. Area of:f*tit'pAvwms. , Cwnrae s t 9"OrAt" Bre of b+teefit vb4l be used to ' s r2e1 w tznetfip of + ,, as i t�sa"exvab ooL f>a�ei'it'� orspox tea" at l iai< t "y tots e t m of ePkea UUV'e mc- I +d tiexrlel f to sou rem. f Imavo aft. . isors �recoquLs" tb 6xisting f ir. is lww"qtU to 'e0 the: t ' e, TWA,, twimittttteMoo a ed asA t:aal. aiwrrXlae. 9l'Me bid it " . di rsot*4 'tea 46;410v adfditffa i 1 Hetet o > tsa i> aef► lex:afeuifeten sce to reduce the ate +nee ea xa>bfffLitlrCir�Mt ba 'mwam�& tZrovu the ftponty0w. std tent. The PWA id ft*kito Director it further to the pare 69. r and State funds. The :tie vel, Diriettibr tahel2" re"rt to the moa rd Periodically on" efie�t 3xt eMYllidjtUq efndeffitietyrl3ng she . An 101 ttW'i,n Section 913 of tho fs�ty Ordinance Coda, Us e� �#ZX Obve�"t ems. that Public Work* ?S€�C �: derrrt e>�a �s� at fafie�ggttit to reei�itrif� efs txerlhteF" Esiir a stent* into ttusrt cve wtte� tor ox t r0row, Ate* wad, bx l aeft as ai t fFax 'tfhill triffia fte. the it"O.,"oft bowfit f url' .> a Qewef tl�e9 *I*im ,e lets! ei�t of tfh+a,': Be 1. > '= die iris a.#on elft Of the i 19, amara bel; b Ze fg �retfh a 9►« $4 tollWUS " "'ll be a to dawaflop, tato jive 1.; fta Biwa Y*= OUT is a short ��' impl"antatloo PIO ■ C� f`t�trisgee>irrrtet �lettw�tt ty� �" 1 fPlets�. 2 9tardt : sue 'inter. th" sure IS, the Director of Cel,y v4"I errs fide 00 milia raft* Dfl xis "a : circ' teat a t tr!er s in the ucdrootted er r tNtra CtaStA Runty for the 1.. fete "bflic WOAX Director and the 40ounty R ni:trtittor mull o"V le ietilor146tion CC fun e*iilattem f roar State Oft"IjAS Wt, local ;itixtda, State u4 foodeas^l grants, i 4. Th* fund +eatia"at�a shall be vroo#nted. to the � ' ranspo aetion Comittat 69 the boatd of Supervisors for kovisir and aVO*owwl b � 19 of *&ok s r- 3. Aftear twWost tate°approva,l, Sita,PUblIC NOrks Director � shall grsparl, with iuout frm the Director or C�6poettxsi ttd am Development aities in tate county, the;ZIyear a4dit4ons to the CUP., All n&V project additions aad misiom w0i take into comidora. tion this poiLay., tending 1laeitations., "l4vaI*j*4trt t.rerddx, � and the r r0vCb nanagitent "rax of measure '��•, s S. peforogamazy l of every year Us clic WorX Di than prxapuare a tCa� t b# rranapox at:S+sn tomit�+a Which vill i�uda that rollowinq, a. no draft five year Mr, b. Cts arison -of the O"Tent Year's project delia�t1l aoaimt the gurrent: CAZP. 0. Identification of the shortfalls.. in funding by $. 41 �In.otgMft.yart..ei�otneabout..he progress in deveop- oynt of "ditieftal s `S. -d 7.- "14 Ai actor o t r pt ovide an aVA17"s, at the s+ed CUP win respeot to any � ,ewlicab" a awth, eta *1rm of k0isurs "C" and .the literal .aa. *° a'Upm.4090"1 of tho dra$`t report by the '1"ransportaCfon Committee, it shall be CLivulatod toe cement and � t►tiWs awosportat Comeittae *hall hold a public � bNeafitnq .'on tbo draft CIMP at: the cmialusian of the 1D* fta ftarAvortation Comittae shall- pr"ent. the carp findl.n and xomtions to the., boat'd at / Oupox filsa for tom'ai;tion no later tWM march l of d Mh y�Maur'. � 1" f91t S=,ixory `$IMk# .. b „the +qty 44op pent + tooa 'lbaq co with tba qty Clerk thin !Mas t I0004' by t blLk CMAtY Transportation {i itte$ Ors py and aprpr d for 6400tion,to Apia 15: 1089. ►«.+a�r+".±�i,Iq"n�r�.4'rtrrr awd osn�t earn a .►r.w"+ �r w +e "rte art aw tarwi rr�el�k1��•�?�!Ml�l�ewwh o . a =r a��a"i4�+b�Mr 11 U0. t►v"S d 185 Appendix B: Guidelines for Expenditure of Gas Tax Revenue {Proposition 111 Funds) 187 DAM 0600ntw 31 loci L f f" tlflr if . t 1. �C�XlDffi�fYYlfriq�frQrn#ta�C�f� 1f1'tiitt�w'otllh�scfcilriiti:�C31� a(rsaerrtus from PmpowoOrt III. . p t rr�;rWaW tic (MM PMPOW n III wXordhotoft �ipdt :�Tdefftt�uir` 1 70 PWM#d ftoptoMM i f f WAnA fOr OWOOM$nt M* tM� c(ftopooftn f I t rwow tar Wim+ ; d 10 perm of pmpodMxy I II f"Oub to sept f trwtct » y r ara WAWcOr�+� Oorooftn e 1 snd Mnns{ rsntf'rtr�m+wftff F44fes. frM�t„ br�rfr*ar�t to ir�iduadfs.lh+ �r �n fi�iwn�nt Irrrd Qra�t (► � rpt L Abboat sW:� f�fCi aw►rwfA Irt�SCt#t � re* �sr>Ir�rr►sht�erort of r+ gW*h*M ks�d h ftbooO ! f1t wft requires mizfrWrft Dart Fund Vpmp*dm tV r ftn8pWsWn mhftdjotVsnmI V swr *W art ft pmt w*W yam. � w OW, Put*Waft oc: rn �► 1 x W., �. x ".":.-:ai, L" a�.,t a�l,l 11 t r.:l��_p- t. r..t*t•..h.' .R"R. if Gal: RR R ,v f ♦` - F, ♦ 1e e R. 'ti. hR C .. ► ';'f� R.�R R F+ a r Fw .1+1• 1 •e: ��: r( r i• ►• e # a .f �. !♦{. i=n 1 ill s e R ^A a • w • R ai • `4 v i H 0Tii Fw ",.r. • • i., •: 9 INK lY • PROPOSMON 111 ` Pis TFi�rir�g we edmWed ttuu by l0k our mainwoortca and angtr+atwf trxpwwkmi,woedd agLw aur rowenus projfr n,Weft-ne f w*for arm italow t eia r impko rl'r"prowam. aftnow no 11904� JM'stw c mn. ' -r sV I c �wrr n"c r ! P608*0 Proj0daft'n Ill. OUA W TAXFEVENUS 01CREWScu PERCENTPER YEARWHRZOUR + rte INICAFAW FWS PEsKENTPER YW. Far c ur aVonn We haft SSWMWO ft go IM J* rrt sty grow at acW pWaent per .y0fir. we taws alga asswned oar myir++arnan and v budom wN*%%m*to ov w st1Ma"W"PerIO keep UP , '1110414fewe NO~aur t"revenue snd aur ekpsrOkmon gowalroeci arta, ;+Mr+ inaerin�and compunce Coot b to �w4kA r�p� And PMJ*ft TOW 1 Sh*" oar rat"ua-~f,-as riditiuf>aM'atroam and &A Mind m �avaikab�k prr�gttkmirxtitt�br rwl�t tl�� �n,.► � ���E� :�a�,r��e o nnpatt0~0 the I Milo 10 f"Ad turd,Propoaftm III ftds and Me rw"V'return 3ca-satrce rrkRlatMaa: r rur .ttk4 a 11WWenue"trft thb W ra*impo"d on th ,sWe of Owllftand d aawri twl priar tp E 11.1 MWO&; Uo.*8 tutus rfrwrOX tom -line�f h�iib,� „cMwr�l lr+�,w9 rr�carr�% 11r�a b +�t1►s I�Ir'r�a�l and Pre p�111 fix srfl ssl tratad anuf�ft-t orae p it per ywlIk4 saaF,�in +ghat fw lick y..r . " it aattnftd to tarp ya W ti $n. i�� of pMm thirsr perpeltl���` Tt�a hQea�ae'C" tn'*0 on, as 4°rams dt:lannw"itma or h , �bxo *0" Ooat,s mad M*fttave and.n ud ert�tnewft. . frtai `tr"xv putt ..trlein%rwh" rk W s far M mem ta, "the O� �o W bft mft artid pr yal nrnbrnt`Adiaa, *vOlOpf"WA,PMAM onord arint and.t We atudiea. ftIl rr COMpkWO oaf are aha atwrt 8n�'atair 1 ani an tncprre. nnac ierf nt Proposition 111 co"Oes�dn in ati3e, t7a M" " to � � nd a POpoeift 111 fuinda, 1WIre5lr Oftft Mac Mdftkft'acrd nshft.ther agawM. ra tcon ilb.n,�rnt anid ilrs; :Oi�niky�***porfttlon catrb"a teaot pWnnit,'ISM. R ntX. pn*O t n. d monitfto tr nlraal4a Er�w�M1r dibk,n ' &Jd be Mkmd tl#te p , «tali ware t�yr: " �r tom. MW*""t 4040010 for: al W.ft:h 'r" I' t ilr*4 w* I p mint am, a agy , It OM.s� a�rysr�iln��tee�l'spa�tllia�tr for e� prem Tha dank-In 1 Mt�.afto +rt an rr+a 1;M the 1�of a. mer be. anct �, 7ttirr a+tt !1naarptrrlt m 111`� std "'V list tallatift � iatatrriwarfwait; rfttiltiir>Mrititetott ritaM " ratYttx�Mi1 . 1rapllX+mai-tttiet rani of kw""-of otx k 0143� . •qtr want h . t.a bUdg*Ow rpt dr 0*'Irm a�` a'ra�r�aa,ft thutrrtt byrMad MW WN.ft aftrn #kr er rtxt V tea oow sem►. "11"ear#bei asaft an T'"it vY **altar ti tw Year t ,l/a she la re%uftd by wry r*W.*d ftchym an *4 liafritattw M B:ItaNx " t ter aciew of nwm rias Am sEYmo PnewNTATm D*Pftu"of n 19 in t9M-r*dL"d to*mount avai*ja for our prow Madre 191 PROPOSMON Ill Papa Four' pvjWrWt. mmom pmWm. As* Itr we hod W plod m *0 spenclitm of ax Boit rs for pm+atnrsrzt+re rraaM F'mP.M, sc�rrNa roma tuft,i and sass wore 60LS y!rrera afar Pro ition i3 two � to keep trach of OW darifCMatms in our pI4"mW t ,nneutir larr,dt�t pram ttrtd. a bwldoo of ram that r+stirw bvyvnco � prawrttwaMt trtt*ftnom Thk wea the vJ*a of a mport pa'codh Morc h its,which k sc!etaW*10Q,Of"BOAW. lbt report sflao:pro�a�d a t ag In liaoat ysw of $35AW=(in iiGy36*oilae`s),V'►fkt wmW road,mrflntartwlrtt Wdng wee riot ir16+e od. The parse mt rrairtiona v*tundkV In I W3 we W3=, O per YW,wtft is mughty OW we "rod tocW on W"Wft s ntatifagnart W ThaWOOD-000 bieft for,ttBl W year towM i PMIOCW in t*:Im report.w0W equwte to $0.0mow to mdayrt dobm tnfofmawn i wagstnittliart: This is W"tram it* 1n 1985 t tort, which io slits to ai*WW6Ct kt MWn*k od r fed oil**{1353 miles h i m vs,745 fro I9W:with to h*Wpia*ion of O*Wo in i :�urtct sorrts O'1rAmdonte r tt#tet end soca, In Ott, to poosop of SB 300 (ice} smro ye a ado pvvidad a one time wirrd d of WxvA �«�1(1"(t5i"i9lir`�e�eltt ir4'k�1i11�111tiCitti tib' OUR BACK PROJECTED TO THE YEAR M tR,CI"BE REWC;ED TREMENDOUSLY IF WENAM"Tr fErto~+i m E MONIES AND PR4P.ts1 N 111 FUNDS ARE USED To SOIATER,OUR PAVEMENT MAiNtENANCE PROGRAM. T"2 of ar aax ,mai lie 6WO-V VMWA ttie`Mi�ro.pf 70%of Prapctattkatt 1 i t u pat errt+tnt ntt tenawnas.;iUM",In oew ju Mr:iiof`twth Measure OV return to •4 rtlartiae. �'ttia ah+�wwr tiSet t�ill�r i�13 tkjf�1MIN t7a�R� � Ob*uwy, tl>ia Sias Of becift Int&your"2OW Is W=qft*WW wo WE rued to I**for; s aiddMlortai��io fuRhar redtrctlf ekwr bwNrkiop�an a�sptMoia levet. i�bwaniar.it Propel igon i i 1 a Mosum IV mons+to: him ��imo ow pmmw, � melt' erawrtC a pmngrarn of tt$�time,thous tour �? w t7w'Ir37 fl t 04.00iQ; i'tw my w%m+aWsi mq eitfam M T"2 amum s an potR M W*wttt in th f Sas tax each year t WW a oWg pm" in ttns sates tax(Mean 101. As air+bo's w ,the now aOurrae Of rennNnuos wit no ardtra ole'becift pmlbl"• Hm"or,,li,is also evident tttat I nate Of that 4 Pioposltlan iii Wwery tam.or MfMm V m0nW*4 rrpertt an aur pammnt maintenanoa Wit. MiMti'O�if1 WHAT ARE'i'W 0Q" QUEN=OF NOT MEMINGt'tN OUR PAVEMENT ` MMf?INiitatCir�R Mmt roods'are dated for,a*a"year Nfe..li=nu malrta nsruae is pwrforawd ansa new road, . swviw hx,iw� to.� f, At whichtime tales at the m ae��a",j�`y�/ 1rutw aft y�sy�d trA{+�ayr y�yw era#yea raenant cist+itioratet edt a . raw i' t pyY# -ribs o� tRq.T+fj loffis rel aQ r n&#uc%dR at whim04 tylt$ �{ t'ty� i ail Y.®.�I�titt IA eto 1tt�5atrl�rr�Nd. "i '_z^at rrt{I�s pyswt tit Lo �wtwwri„�wrla+��baudfif rt+rr�rd a rar�rd�lr�xaaa�ta gyeyy Jaya�i ia�yr�_,y^y�"�^`1w�Np��j ��tf ipaMt�tsr� tN'*!".•.4yttia lewd�i�4 is i MnnML yq {4�Y k*W won YOM.�.i V3 rz y*. Is r�l l t .R wwdwtvo: f>Ihiptains wssMfd tMw'�be t+�tsr�'�. AfdY�tr>rfd�>hR t�uki kawtlftky yeas+�ti't pt rr or trrutthrttr�aytrria�yi.naesatl`tlt*mvt C jviix wttt�ty*A rrts���t/a . It 00ft W%kV is rrW4 to dw It don to porlom MW Fill wive.W4 OtOnd b um"IM tO""Y Yom.. ft �,ihar fora,t�f slot linve tr~p In err prevents�re pawu�nt'wr^yt mseintansnoe pwrarrt , lWs to incw mow cape k awe+-m to fe ux hood syae+m,mlthu Darr a o mm rn&s d'tswi irkftoft fW pratnit>twAive maht m wf. ` R9Wf:1 GRAND JURY RMRT RECOMMEND$ USING MEASURE V RETURN TO SOURCE MONIES FOR PAVEMENT MAilhiTSVMCE. Tho Bowd ow a dorad ttt J*psndIturrt d Momm V MUM to mm*monlaa wfth the CoaM Road'knpraarontertt Poky. This pact',a doplod by SWd On Mtty tM.190,priactito the openditwo of Momm"C`mmiea as kams: 192 PWPtll MOH l l F t. 14 rtifintrrwrri prratttini lave!e+ ttsr raaict aaety aa�d satxon pt ects,*ss array�tram taut,�sod etas:Wanw. Z "Worwttucdon d county roars. t p413iplyiptait t at cow*rho;, 4. TWfrc congestion rellef+fit p rotArm vwt4ch wdstrd bokm 1 at r 1W. As "<as a► mini wm budget fe n�ttwi oinod for a prcyft then ft am . #sir mpriilo* of Misesurs C l mdsa lies lnl* plwrbtx'+wnt Program to r cw ttte Tho 10040 c*** t ems t ou tty Gnmd iixy eubtnlltsd;e'Mort +trtdtlad .Couno Fwd RttvOnt ;• ThIs t :my"k t trrt `too'Oyo w n Met ttw 0ounity tip rad at an,a� mft rale-Out to 4odift rperl rxyr nionsrttor,which haat beebeem bmvgtt an marir"ryanow tx #t srtd erdc of artuste MOW*rats WAV. Thewr rop rt raaOm owliher :d3t�pairviaarre togenv te,eddlt# haltwomut(wto6Yd mai riortly. "pU"d tothata�tj+�"o "C" ocadw, PA MSM)N t 11 FUND$.SHOULD TOE, USIM ALO •WITH � 100 RETURNTO St�URC'9: �TO�L5RR OUR PA NT'IANRt��SYS*MM AND�REDUCE OUR OAZUai Tto Trampot rt Garrs*"t rd ftrs mend of Prtrpostion I 11 funds and d urea ttia Saarrd to adopt M 1r*font ndV ft nowPeopooltion 111 rr omm. plot tha: roan on the d6lfir,the byuik ot,ft rage 0 ftUld .on the,parvtarrrent nww"M-nonce p vW*i .h+ ever,#wo*also lso*do**thdt"should lbt ovendod sw rality, knprou l4 aredfc �p m imprsrnnwrnen e. Asarr"the Tra porgy Camitlao twom nlands dWProp6*106 „1 funds,be spent In fee toil rttwrtftar; t. 710 pwfttt di Pr000ftn I 1 t rsutema i€ar p&rwnrt+tw*rr*kwAnc* Z 2D pwtwt d Proposition 111 omonm for,rte trrVranwmants & io P*rcw of Propcmoon,III meta for Softly F st:prlr y 11nr tie "rat airtt r itrrttar is tQ.wWlA*and major lis, Crud�ttx 111w naeintiwr+aartrys raws�rtuw , �pr+tnr+irrtt�.r�tyrr'ttnr 1N irra cWrl rriara rt lasmdwo=0110L"flet tt #priorfly ler Ib romys,toods:t tha baoid . tQ"*, w+s bud;*,o i trot,l ' artd oil� 1kaRr ttyat low ttmlc Thw rae#atndtturai rilawxk4*rid tsar taiirr 'budtq sued tour ao s�pprdrtgr # ,t�Ct tirx taratl y+twr top a�lir Sates 1Fte `otter �bet prgwtda�c! tar mkt of.thsaa t�'trswtromWarrtw ovttr �t±l}�It l ip�fridaet`t i t rai�t�w dWub*W+re aba�re; ltatror CltsE ttaw tt aaer;raatommanda.Omgoilmtd i n r� i the Qr�r .,fury ratp�ort an Rpr1d DAatlttarnarrtir3s 'lbw wt yww s« rd aro a tree, € MONK"v t�c�s t,t a ter vai saw,ft last at lrrrprtatiat[rta dt s rafts (,In the Caunty tend, krrpr+twwnt�r�t f��r ae w�Herr.wxp!ertdli�urtr �Iwi+ twuro'rC"s�� -h ,,�� tdher wtcr�# ltte t�l�, ii 1 and M �mr� tturrna al,vwrr►to T.da vrrr€t SW* 'ft k*Wt of#0 CMAW PAW kwoveffew Pt had kk~ separate tnr mossum OV ra ov ss"an taut twa4rrues.. $PENDINISPROIXOS"11 i t'UNV$AM MEASLW V FVURN TO SOURM MOWS ON t 1u:111VQ &JR F*A0SYS7iMWU GK THE PUSIX THE aMMT AMOUNT OF t rwvc Rl�FOR THP DOLLAR Not lxrlyr in wcpending ret nL*+un our perwttrwnt nekomm wr pr 'sm a sed Invesornatnt in ox rood, syvW rty W It IIsry��s�ey t*ft�t to flat pr, c,min{t,wilt a�`r►�� h�yernr�t yt�hw�s 4 dwsbft, and µ+ms' kyd e' in sadh rM �al IN rata nrttatndattoras maw in thltr roport would lmp rat nlrtsty wtght n hats of Caunly A**i t ttut ft7m of cNp awsbt and slurry s+wr*and ek min in the tarn d everlsys or rw onstrvOdw am .. ............................................. PRQPOST ON III "Sfnt th+�OW^two YO:N two ftftl Of ft fuinds were allocated:to Surface tneftments and one gird to mol"and r600netriuctlon. DISCUSOWS tft " days Octan cesnter around the WO of Bary" of our roads 1n terra ot =pw*y. Nobody discumeft the iml of service of our mads in terms of maintenafte or MV4NOflty. A road,ttrat is not maintained andis W wad to deteriorate wiM affpc&mly have tW ' mpadly mkmod eV�are broad tore um tisirspeed due to a bMan and.rough paws mrd � surf** As to nod dWrtaftvft.the.safe Speed,rd ft mpwky of to road Vis: betrorw yon"0' MTC ced>s'"idy twh t WOMW OW poor pewe+rtM carpditra cost ttw pubife 300 per vehtde per year in termer of addldoral wear and temr. with they +tfy's 648.000 i Mg*MW vVile ss,°thpt,equan to a total CM of$X 4O kODO. ltJ'. _ . Them would be no guidelines for the ire of revenue-from Proposition 111 � and eto--vel ct soviar of our road system would suffer. 194 r r ,+gam v a u .� # .. j. . , T 196 AN . ' 9 as tyi 1 t t t t Y } t t 1 1 1 E 198 '�