Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 08152000 - C5-C8 TO::: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS 0. 6 FROM: MAURICE M. SHIU, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR DATE: August 15, 2000 SUBJECT: APPROVE a Consulting Services Agreement with L A Consulting, Inc. to provide assistance in selecting and implementing a Maintenance Management System, Countywide. RESCIND the Board action of July 25, 2000 to Approve and Authorize the execution of the Consulting Services Agreement with Lorick Associates Consulting, Inc. Project Number 4547-6A5056. SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION 1. Recommended Action: APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director to execute the Consulting Services Agreement with L A Consulting, Inc., in the amount of$76,549, to analyze current Public Works maintenance practices and to assist in the selection and implementation of a Maintenance Management software product, countywide. RESCIND the Board action of July 25, 2000 to Approve and Authorize the execution of the Consulting Services Agreement with Lorick Associates Consulting, Inc. II. Financial lmpact: Agreement provides for compensation of consulting services in an amount not to exceed $76,549 (100% Road Funds and Special Dis ricts). Continued on Attachment: X SIGNATURE: " RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE —APPROVE OTHER URE ACTION OF BOARD ON AUGUST 15, APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER 2000 VOTE OF SUPERVISORS X UNANIMOUS (ABSENT IV ) I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action AYES: NOES: taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors ABSENT: ABSTAIN: on the date shown. TB:sd \\PWS4\SHARDATA\GrpData\Maint\Sherri\ ATTESTED: AUGUST 15, 2000 Board OrdersConsulting 6-15.doo Clerk of the Board of Supervisors and Orig.Div: PublicicWWorks(Maintenance) PHIL BATCHELOR, Contact: T.Borman,313-7050 County Administrator cc: County Admin. Gen.Serv.,Purchasing Auditor Controller P.W.Accounting LA Consulting,Inc. By s6n2Deputy 840 Apollo Street,Suite 324 EI Segundo,CA 90245 G.047 . SUI§1d ECT: APPROVE Consulting Services Agreement with LA Consulting, Inc. to provide assistance in selecting and implementing a Maintenance Management System, Countywide. RESCIND the Board action of July 25, 2000 to Approve and Authorize the execution of the Consulting Services Agreement with Lorick Associates Consulting, Inc. Project Number 4547-6A5056 DATE: August 15, 2000 PACE: 2 111. treasons for Recommendations and Background: The Public Works Department is working to bring its policies and practices into conformance with the best management practices established by the American Public Works Association in order to become an "Accredited Public Works Agency." A significant element of the Department's responsibility is the management of infrastructure improvements. Modern practice as reflected in the APWA accreditation criteria, requires a detailed, systematic analysis of the condition of all infrastructure assets to best manage maintenance programs. The most efficient way to provide the necessary analysis is through the use of a computerized information system —a Maintenance Management System (MMS). We anticipate significant cost savings due to increased efficiency through the use of a MMS. There are many commercial computer software products available that are designed to manage infrastructure assets. However, the experience of many public agencies has shown that successful implementation of a MMS depends on carefully matching the capabilities of a software product to the goals and current practices of the maintenance organization. With this in mind, a request for qualifications, related to MMS system implementation, was sent to twenty-six management consultants. Three responses were received. A subsequent request for proposal resulted in responses from LA Consulting, Inc. and Santina and Thompson. LA Consulting, Inc. was selected as the most qualified to provide the requested services. LA Consulting, Inc. will evaluate and document our current maintenance activities, will recommend improvements in work methods, equipment and material utilization and budgeting and management procedures. The consultant will facilitate our review of MMS software products and recommend products for our selection. LA Consulting, Inc. will assist Department staff installing the selected software product and assure that it performs acceptably. In presenting the Consulting Services Agreement to the Board of Supervisors on July 25, 2000, the Department inadvertently identified the consulting firm by its former name— Lorick Associates Consulting, Inc. The correct name of the consulting firm is LA Consulting, Inc. Rescinding the Board action of July 25, 2000 approving the agreement with Lorick Associates Consulting, Inc. will clarify the record of Board Actions. IV. Consequences of Negative Action: Without the requested consultant services, the Department faces an increased risk of poor implementation of a MMS. -71.0:.- BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FROM: MAURICE M. SHIU, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR DATE: August 15, 2000 SUBJECT: Approve the Byron Highway Shoulder Widening Project, ADOPT the CEQA Negative Declaration, and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director to advertise the project at his discretion, Byron Area. Project No. 0662-6R4240, CDD-CP #00-44 Specific Request(s) or Recommendation(s) & Background & Justification I. RECOMMENDED ACTION: APPROVE the Byron Highway Shoulder Widening Project, and FIND, on the basis of the initial study and all comments received, that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment, and ADOPT the Negative Declaration in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act, (the custodian of which is the Public Works Director who is located at 255 Glacier Drive, Martinez), and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director to advertise the project at his discretion, and s' Continued on Attachment: X SIGNATURE: RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE APPROVE OTHER � SIGNATURE (S): ACTION OF BOARD ON AUGUST 15, 2077 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED_OTHER I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the X (AS VOTE OF SUPERVISORS minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the AYES: NOES: X UNANIMOUS (ABSENT IV, ) date shown. p ABSENT: ABSTAIN: G:tGrpDatalEngSvcIENVIRO12000Projects\ByronHwyLTurn1BOND ATTESTED: AUGUST 15, 2000 Orig.Div: Public Works(Eng Sery Division) Contact: M.de la O, Ph. (313-2355) PHIL BATCHELOR, Clerk of the Board Of cc: County Administrator Supervisors and County Administrator Attn: E. Kuevor Auditor-Controller Community Development—D. Foley PW Accounting By C�113. Construction Deputy L. Chavez, Engineering Services SUBJECT: APPROVE the Byron Highway Shoulder Widening Project, ADOPT the CEQA Negative Declaration, and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director to advertise the project at his discretion, Byron Area. Project No.0662-6R4240, CDD-CP #00-44 DATE: August 15, 2000 PAGE: 2 DIRECT the Director of Community Development to file a Notice of Determination with the County Clerk, and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director to arrange for payment of a $25 fee to Community Development for processing, and a $25 fee to the County Clerk for filing the Notice of Determination, and DIRECT the Public Works Director to arrange for the $1,250 Fish and Game filing fee to be transferred to the County Clerk. 111. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The estimated project cost is $656,600 funded by 80% TEA21 Funds and 20% local Road Funds. 1111. REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATION/BACKGROUND: The project includes a four-foot shoulder widening along both sides (east and west) of Byron Highway. It is needed in order bring the shoulder along this section of Byron Highway up to current design standards. The project has been determined to be in compliance with the General Plan. A Negative Declaration of environmental significance pertaining to this project was published on June 12, 2000. The Board has considered the Negative Declaration together with all comments received during the public review period. IV. CONSEQUENCES OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Delay in approving the project will result in a delay of design and construction and may jeopardize funding. CONTRA PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT COSTA INITIAL STUDY COUNTY OF ENVIRONMENTAL SIGNIFICANCE PROJECT #0662-6R4240 CP# 00-44 PROJECT NAME: Byron Highway Shoulder Widening PREPARED BY: Leigh Ch v z ADATE: 5/15/00 APPROVED BY: DATE: �81� RECOMMENDATIONS: ( ) Categorical Exemption (Class) ( X ) Negative Declaration ( } Environmental Impact Report Required ( ) Conditional Negative Declaration The project will not have a significant effect on the environment. The recommendation Is based on the following: There is no substantial evidence that the project or any of its aspects may cause a significant effect on the environment (Sec. 15063(b)(2)). What changes to the project would mitigate the identified impacts N/A U'SGS Quad Sheet Byron Hot Springs Base Map Sheet# Q27 Parcel # N/A GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS: 1. Location: The project is located along Byron Highway near the intersection with Camino Diablo in the east county area in the community of Byron. The shoulder widening will extend from Byron Hot Springs Road north to Holway Drive (Figures 1, 2). 2. Project-Description:. The project consists of a four-foot shoulder widening along both sides (east and west) of Byron Highway. The shoulder widening will extend from Byron Hot Springs Road north to Holway Drive (approximately 9,000 feet or 2,750 meters). The shoulder widening is being implemented in order to bring the shoulder along this section of Byron Highway up to current design standards. In order to widen the shoulder, existing shoulder backing will be removed and replaced with asphalt concrete. New shoulder backing will be installed adjacent to the asphalt concrete and tapered to existing grade. Excavation associated with the removal of the shoulder backing and replacement with asphalt concrete is not expected to exceed one foot in depth. No right of way acquisition will be necessary for the project. V Li •�aI W � Li.-��o} T ry ow t 0 q y� CL' CL d tai 3 s � �r 3 C� d s W W tss � LLJ � d � C 0or- -� LL- CS -� U W W s d 00 C11- � 2 Environmental Checklist Form 1. Project Title: Byron Highway Shoulder Widening Project 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: Contra Costa County Community Development Department 651 Pine Street,North Wing-4th Floor Martinez, CA 94553 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Leigh Chavez(925) 313-2366 4. Project Location: The project is located along Byron Highway near the intersection with Camino Diablo in the east county area in the community of Byron 5. Project Sponsor's Name/Address: Contra Costa County Public Works Department 6. General Plan Designation: Public and Semi-public 7. Zoning: Existing Arterial 8. Description of Project: The project consists of a four-foot shoulder widening along both sides(east and west)of Byron Highway. The shoulder widening will extend from Byron Hot Springs Road north to Holway Drive(approximately 9,000 feet or 2,750 meters). The shoulder widening is being implemented in order to bring the shoulder along this section of Byron Highway up to current design standards. In order to widen the shoulder, existing shoulder backing will be removed and replaced with asphalt concrete. New shoulder backing will be installed adjacent to the asphalt concrete and tapered to existing grade. Excavation associated with the removal of the shoulder backing and replacement with asphalt concrete is not expected to exceed one foot in depth. No right of way acquisition will be necessary for the project. Construction activities associated with the shoulder widening will impact the minimum amount of vegetation necessary. There are approximately 25 Eucalyptus trees ranging in size from 4"dbh to 48"dbh that will likely require removal in order to widen the shoulder of Byron Highway. Every effort will be made to retain as many of the trees in place as feasible. In order to determine whether the removal of these trees would be of concern to the residents of Byron, the Byron Municipal Advisory Committee(MAC)was consulted by staff from the Public Works Department. The Byron MAC voted to remove the trees based on community input(4/6/00). On April 13, 2000, a wildlife biologist hired by the County reviewed the Eucalyptus trees slated for removal for nesting birds (Biosearch Wildlife Surveys, Allaback,4/00). The biologist identified one great-horned owl (Buba virginianus) nest occupied by two owlets. Great-horned owls are early nesting species,therefore, as recommended by Mr. Allaback, the trees will be removed in November or December after chicks from the previous nesting season have fledged and before adults return for the next nesting season. In order to further ensure they are free of active bird nests, the trees will be resurveyed prior to their November or December removal. The shoulder widening will not increase the capacity of Byron Highway, and vehicles traveling on the highway will be no closer to sensitive receptors (i.e., homes, schools, etc.) 3 DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: ✓ I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment,but at least one effect (1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and(2)has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required,but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. T I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a)have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and(b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR,including revisions or mitigation meas t imposed upon the proposed project. Signature Date ( ►b i e. a`mx (a CCC Community Development Department Printed Name For 5 or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Source#4,8) SUMMARY: The General Plan identifies Byron Highway as a Scenic Route, however, the project will not have a significant impact on the aesthetic quality of the roadway. The paved shoulder will be four feet wider on both sides of Byron Highway than current conditions. The widened shoulder will not significantly impact the visual character of the roadway. Construction activities associated with the shoulder widening will impact the minimum amount of vegetation necessary. There are approximately 25 Eucalyptus trees ranging in size from 4"dbh to 48"dbh that will likely require removal in order to widen the shoulder of Byron Highway. The trees were likely originally planted as a wind block along the length of agricultural fields parallel to Byron Highway. The primary view north of the Eucalyptus trees consists of homes and associated street and orchard trees and buildings in the Community of Byron. South of the Eucalyptus trees, the primary view is agricultural fields and the railroad. The trees to be removed are located adjacent to agricultural fields rather than residences (there are no homes immediately adjacent to or across the street from the trees). Therefore, the trees are not a dominant view from the nearby residences, and as such, their removal will not significantly impact the aesthetics of the area. In order to determine whether the impact due to removal of the trees would be of concern to the residents of Byron, the Byron Municipal Advisory Committee (MAC)was consulted. The Byron MAC voted to remove the trees based on community input (4/6/00). In order to minimize damage to any additional trees that will not require removal,but may be impacted by construction, contract specifications will include protective measures such as clean trimming of roots and limbs. Construction equipment will be visible temporarily during construction of the shoulder,however this is a minor and short-term impact, ending upon completion of the project. Building the widened shoulder will not create a permanent source of significant new light or glare. All exposed areas that are not shoulder backing will be seeded with a mix including native grasses and wildflowers appropriate to the Byron area following completion of the project. Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporation Impact Impact II. AGRICULTURAL,RESOURCES: In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects,lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model(1997) prepared by the California Dept. Of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agricultural and farmland. Would the project: 7 Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Inmact Incorporation Impact IrnI act e. Create objectionable odors affecting a _ X _ substantial number of people? (Source#2,4) SUMMARY: Short-term emissions and objectionable odors may be generated during construction; however, they will be minor and temporary. In order to minimize impacts due to construction activities, contract specifications will stipulate the use of properly tuned and muffled equipment and the elimination of unnecessary idling of equipment when not in use. Implementation of dust control practices including general watering of exposed areas and/or use of chemical stabilizers will also minimize air quality impacts. The minor temporary deterioration of ambient air quality at the construction site will have no potentially adverse long- term impacts to air quality. Widening of the shoulder will not increase the capacity of Byron Highway; therefore,the project will not generate any new vehicle trips. No permanent air quality impacts due to vehicle traffic will be produced by the project since no additional trips will be generated by the shoulder widening project. IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a. Have a substantial adverse effect, either a X directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans,polices,or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service? (Source#1,2,4, 12) b. Have a substantial adverse effect on any i X i riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans,policies,regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service?(Source#1,2,4) C. Have a substantial adverse effect on X federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including,but not limited to,marsh, vernal pool,coastal,etc.)through direct removal, filling,hydrological interruption,or other means?(Source#1,2,4) d. Interfere substantially with the movement _ X of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or 9 Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No m act Incomoration I=act Impact Based on the potential presence of burrowing owls (Athene cunicularia) in the agricultural fields adjacent to the project, and since burrowing owls have been documented occupying burrows along roadside shoulders, staff from the Environmental Section of the Public Works Department surveyed the general project area for burrows that could be utilized by burrowing owl (5/8/00). No burrows were identified along the highway shoulder. Two small burrows (1.555 to 2"in diameter)were identified approximately 20 feet from the existing edge of pavement in the unmaintained area between Byron Highway and the railroad. These burrows are located approximately 15 feet beyond the area to be widened. There was no evidence of use of the burrows by burrowing owls (e.g., cast pellets, feathers, droppings,prey remains). Based on the lack of burrows along the highway shoulder, and the lack of evidence of use at the two identified burrows between the highway and the railroad, impacts to burrowing owls are not expected as a result of the project. On April 13, 2000, a wildlife biologist hired by the County reviewed the Eucalyptus trees slated for removal for nesting birds (Biosearch Wildlife Surveys, Allaback, 4/00). The biologist identified one great-homed owl(bubo virginianus)nest occupied by two owlets. Great-homed owls are early nesting species, therefore, as recommended by Mr. Allaback, the trees will be removed in November or December after chicks from the previous nesting season have fledged and before adults return for the next nesting season. In order to further ensure they are free of active bird nests, the trees will be resurveyed prior to their November or December removal. V. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the — X significance of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5?(Source#1,4) b. Cause a substantial adverse change in the — _ X _ significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5?(Source#1,4) C. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique X paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? (Source#1,4) d. Disturb any human remains, including _ X those interred outside of formal cemeteries? (Source#1,4) SUMMARY: Byron Highway is an existing heavily traveled arterial roadway. The area surrounding the road was disturbed during initial installation of the highway. There are no residences or other structures that will be impacted by the project. No new right of way will need to be required in order to construct the project. Excavation associated with the removal of 7 11 Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporation Impact Impact disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water?{Source#NIA} SUMMARY: Construction of the shoulder widening will not expose people to adverse effects due to seismic activity. The Vaqueros Fault is located approximately four miles to the west of the project site and there is an unnamed fault in the general vicinity of the project; however,the location of the fault is uncertain. Superficial grading of the project area is not expected to result in unstable earth conditions or change to geographical substructures. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards is not expected to increase as a result of the project. According to the Contra Costa County Soil Survey, soils in the vicinity of the project consist of Brentwood clay loam, Capay clay(wet), Capay clay, Marcuse clay and Solano loam. Brentwood clay is well drained, runoff is slow and there is no hazard of erosion where the soil is tilled and exposed. Capay clay (wet) soil has slow runoff characteristics, and there is no hazard of erosion where the soil is tilled and exposed. Capay clay has slow runoff`characteristics and the hazard of erosion is slight where the soil is tilled and exposed. Marcuse clay is poorly drained,with very slow runoff and no hazard of erosion. Solano loam has slow runoff characteristics, and the hazard of erosion is moderate. Minor grading and excavation associated with the shoulder widening will result in a minor change in topography and temporarily increase the exposure of soils to wind erosion. However,this is an insignificant and temporary impact. Adherence to standard dust control and erosion control practices, including,but not limited to, general watering of exposed areas and/or use of chemical stabilizers will minimize impacts. In order to minimize potential erosion due to general watering during construction activities, contract specifications will require the contractor implement appropriate watering levels and duration. These measures will be incorporated into the construction contract. All areas left exposed due to the shoulder widening will be seeded with a mix including native grasses and wildflowers upon completion of the project in order to stabilize exposed soil. VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Would the project: a. Create a significant hazard to the public — — X or the environment through the routine transport,use,or disposal of hazardous materials?{Source#1,2,4,7} b. Create a significant hazard to the public — — X or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions 13 Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No I=act Incorporation Imnact Imroact open at all times, however, vehicle travelways will be slightly narrowed to eleven feet using roadway delineators such as pylons in order to allow for work to be conducted on the shoulders of Byron Highway. The highway will be widened in phases (one side of the highway, then the other) in order to minimize potential impacts to traffic. VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY- Would the project: a. Violate any water quality standards or _ _ X waste discharge requirements?(Source#2,4) b. Substantially deplete groundwater supplies _ _ _ X or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level(e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)?(Source#1,2,4,6) C. Substantially alter the existing drainage X pattern of the site or area,including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on-or off-site? (Source#4,6) d. Substantially alter the existing drainage _ X pattern of the site or area,including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river,or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on-or offsite? (Source#4,6) e. Create or contribute runoff water which _ X would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff?(Source#1,4,6) f. Otherwise substantially degrade water _ X quality?(Source#4,6) g. Place housing within a 100-year flood _ X hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? (Source#1,6,9) h. Place within a 100-year flood hazard area _ X structures which would impede or redirect 15 Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporation Inac 1MRact adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? (Source#1,2,4) C. Conflict with any applicable habitat _ _ _ X conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? (Source#1,2,4) SUMMARY: Capacity of the roadway will not increase as a result of the project. The project will not result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of the area. The County General Plan defines Byron Highway as an existing arterial with the land use surrounding the project being primarily agricultural. No right of way will be required in order to construct the shoulder widening. In order to take into account community interests and concerns regarding the project, the Byron Municipal Advisory Committee was consulted by staff from the Public Works Department regarding the project. The MAC voted to approve the shoulder widening project(K. Deighton, Byron MAC, 1/28/00). The project is consistent with the County General Plan Transportation and Circulation Elements Roadway and Transit Goals#5-A(To provide a safe, efficient and balanced transportation system), Policy#5-9 (Existing circulation facilities shall be improved and maintained by eliminating structural and geometric design deficiencies), and Policy#5-17 (The design and the scheduling of improvements to arterials and collectors shall give priority to safety over other factors including capacity). Widening the road shoulder will not result in an increase in population, displacement of people, or create a demand for additional housing. X. MINERAL RESOURCES -Would the project. a. Result in the loss of availability of a known _ _ X _ mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? (Source#1,2) b. Result in the loss of availability of a locally- _ X important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? (Source#1,2) SUMMARY. During construction, the project will use paving materials (i.e., asphalt),wood products, concrete and other materials derived from natural resources; however, the project will not significantly impact these resources. The use of oil and gasoline to operate the machinery for construction purposes is negligible and of a short-term, temporary nature. In order to minimize 17 Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporation Imact Impact average. Contract specifications will impose a noise limit of 85 dBA at 50 feet. In addition, contract specifications will require the use of properly tuned and muffled equipment to minimize noise generated as a result of construction. Working hours will be limited to 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, and 9 a.m. to 7 p.m. on weekends and holidays in order to limit noise disturbance during sensitive hours. These hours will be strictly adhered to unless modified upon written approval by the resident engineer. The working hours will be incorporated as part of the construction contract. XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING- Would the project: a. Induce substantial population growth in an _ _ X area,either directly(for example,by proposing new homes and businesses)or indirectly(for example,through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? (Source#2,4) b. Displace substantial numbers of existing e _ X housing,necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? (Source#2,4) C. Displace substantial numbers of people, _ X necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?(Source#2,4) SUNUvIARY: The proposed project is located along an existing roadway. The shoulder widening will not affect available capacity of Byron Highway and will, therefore, not induce population growth. The project will not result in the displacement of any homes or residents. The project will not result in a change in the location, distribution, density or growth rate of human population in the area. The project will not affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional houses. The project will not require the removal of any homes or the displacement of any people. XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities,need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts,in order to maintain 19 Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporation ILn2acY mac SUMMARY: The County Resource Mapping System and the field reviews did not identify any recreational opportunities in the immediate project area. Surrounding land uses in the vicinity of the project consist of undeveloped land, agricultural land,residences and businesses. XV. TRANSPORTATIONfIRAEEIC-Would the project: a. Cause an increase in traffic which is _ X _ substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips,the volume to capacity ratio on roads,or congestion at intersections)? (Source#1,2,4,11) b. Exceed,either individually or cumulatively, X _ a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? (Source#1,2,4,11) C. Result in a change in air traffic patterns, X including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks?(Source#N/A) d. Substantially increase hazards due to a design _ _ X feature(e.g., sharp curves or dangerous inter- sections)or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?(Source#1,2,4) e. Result in inadequate emergency access? — X (Source#1,2,4) f. Result in inadequate parking capacity? _ _ X (Source#N/A) g. Conflict with adopted policies,plans, or — _ X programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g.,bus turnouts,bicycle racks)? (Source#2,11) SIJMIVIARY: Byron Highway is a heavily traveled arterial roadway with 10,400 daily trips recorded as of July, 1995. However,vehicle trips generated, even during peak morning and afternoon hours, do not differ dramatically between the eastbound and the westbound direction. Traffic in both directions is roughly equal and fairly consistent throughout the day. According to the 1995 data, much of the early morning traffic in both directions has passed through the area by 7:00 a.m. Contract specifications will not allow construction to begin prior to 7:00 a.m. 07 21 Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No mat Incorporation Impact lmoact d. Have sufficient water supplies available to _ _ X serve the project from existing entitlement and resources, or are new or expanded entitlement needed? (Source#N/A) e. Result in a determination by the wastewater _ _ X treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments?(Source#N/A) f. Be served by a landfill with sufficient _ _ X permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? (Source#N/A) g. Comply with federal, state and local statutes _ _ X and regulations related to solid waste? (Source#N/A) SUMMARY. A combined PG&E and Pacific Bell powerline runs parallel to Byron highway in the vicinity of the project. In order to facilitate the shoulder widening, several of the poles associated with the powerline will require relocation to the County's right of way line. The relocation will be coordinated with staff from PG&E and Pacific Bell. XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE- a. Does the project have the potential to degrade _ _ X _ the quality of the environment,substantially reduce the habitat of a fish and wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels,threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community,reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have impacts that are indiv- _ X _ idually limited,but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable"means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects,the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? C. Does the project have environmental effects X which will cause substantial adverse effects on 23 Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incomoration Impact Impact the other) in order to minimize potential impacts to traffic. A combined PG&E and Pacific Bell powerline runs parallel to Byron Highway in the vicinity of the project. In order to facilitate the shoulder widening, several of the poles associated with the powerline will require relocation to the County's right of way line. The relocation will be coordinated with staff from PG&E and Pacific Bell. As discussed in Sections II (Agricultural Resources), III(Air Quality),V(Cultural Resources),VI (Geology and Soils),VII(Hazards and Hazardous Materials),VIR(Hydrology and Water Quality), IX(Land Use and Planning),X(Mineral Resources),XI(Noise),XII(Population and Housing),XIII (Public Services), and XIV (Recreation)the proposed project will not result in substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. g\enviro\2000Projects\ByronHwyShoulder\NEGDEC Community Centra Commis tvt. Deve atcP Community Development Director Development Costa Department County County Administration Building 651 Pine Street r; -�.' JUN 1 2 2000 4th Floor,North Wing Martinez,California 94553-0095 51. V&iR, COUNTY CLERK Phone: '335-1210 `a.� ..... CONTRA COSTA COUNTY " `avn BY DBPUT NOTICE OF PUBLIC REVIEW AND INTENT TO ADOPT A PROPOSED NEGATIVE DECLARATION County File # CP 00-44 Pursuant to the State of California Public Resources Code and the "Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" as amended to date, this is to advise you that the Community Development Department of Contra Costa County has prepared an initial study on the following project: BYRON HIGHWAY SHOULDER WIDENING PROJECT, County File # CP00-44: The project consists of a four-foot shoulder widening along both sides (east and west) of Byron Highway. The shoulder widening will extend from Byron Hot Springs Road north to Holway Drive (approximately 9,000 feet or 2,750 meters). The shoulder widening is being implemented in order to bring the shoulder along this section of Byron Highway up to current design standards. In order to-widen the shoulder, existing-shoulder-backing wV he remoma -ar d replaced.with— asphalt concrete. New shoulder backing will be installed adjacent to the asphalt concrete and tapered to existing grade. Excavation associated with the removal of the shoulder backing and replacement with asphalt concrete is not expected to exceed one foot in depth. No right of way acquisition will be necessary for the project. Construction activities associated with the shoulder widening will impact the minimum amount of vegetation necessary. There are approximately 25 Eucalyptus trees ranging in size from 4" dbh to 48" dbh that will likely require removal in order to widen the shoulder of Byron Highway. Every effort will be made to retain as many of the trees in place as feasible. In order to determine whether the removal of these trees would be of concern to the residents of Byron, the Byron Municipal Advisory Committee (MAC) was consulted by staff from the Public Works Department. The Byron MAC voted to remove the trees based on community input(4/6/00). On April 13, 2000, a wildlife biologist hired by the County reviewed the Eucalyptus trees slated for removal for nesting birds (Biosearch Wildlife Surveys, Allaback, 4/00). The biologist identified one great-horned owl (Bubo virginianus) nest occupied by two owlets. Creat-homed owls are early nesting species, therefore, as recommended by Mr. Allaback, the trees will be removed in November or December after chicks from the previous nesting season have fledged and before adults return for the next nesting season. In order to further ensure they are free of active bird nests, the trees will be resurveyed prior to their November or December removal. The shoulder widening will not increase the capacity of Byron Highway, and vehicles traveling on the highway will be no closer to sensitive receptors (i.e., homes, schools, etc.) than they are currently. A powerline including PG&E and Pacific Bell utilities runs parallel to Byron Highway in the vicinity of the project. In order to facilitate the shoulder widening, several of the poles will require relocation to the County's right of way line. The relocation will be coordinated with staff from PG&E and Pacific Bell. Page 1 of 2 Office Hours Monday- Friday:8:00 a.m.- 5:00 p.m. Office is closed the 1 st, 3rd & 5th Fridays of each month Mauri hiu Contra Public Works Department Public or sDi Public works Director Costa 255 Glacier Drive R.Mitch Avalon County Martinez,CA 94553-4825 Deputy-Engineering Telephone: (925)313-2000 Jacqueline S.James FAX: (925)313-2333 Acting Chief of Admin.Svcs. Patricia R.McNamee August 1, 2000 Deputy-Operations Julia R.Bueren Deputy-Transportation Mr. Gary Martin 746 Horizon Drive Martinez, California 94553 Our File: Byron Highway Shoulder Widening Project Dumber: 0662-684240 Dear Mr. Martin: The Contra Costa County Public Works Department has received your comments on the Byron Highway Shoulder Widening Negative Declaration. Following are responses to your comments. Please note that I have numbered your comments and questions on your enclosed letter. Please refer to your letter to determine what specific question or comment is being addressed. In addition, I have included a rough sketch of the area for your reference. Qomment 1: As you acknowledge in your letter, the trees proposed for removal are located within the public right-of-way; however, through this comment/response process regulated by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), residents in the project area have been provided the opportunity to voice their concerns regarding the project. In addition, the Byron Municipal Advisory Committee has held meetings to discuss the project in general, as well as the tree removal specifically. In compliance with the Brown Act, the agenda for these meetings was posted in the window of the Byron Town Hall (Chamber of Commerce Building on Main Street) (K. Leighton, pers. comm. 7/26/00). Interested community members had the opportunity to attend these meetings and provide input on the project. As a result of community input at the meetings, the MAC determined that the project (including the removal of the trees) would be acceptable and beneficial to the Byron Community. Comment 2: Although there is an existing nest that was being utilized at the time of the survey by nesting great-homed owls, the trees will not be removed until a determination has been made by a qualified biologist that the nest is no longer actively in use. Although the majority of trees that immediately line Byron Highway just south of the residence at 15189 Byron Highway will be removed, approximately twelve trees ranging in size from approximately 6" dbh to greater than 36" dbh are located far enough outside the project area (deeper into the adjacent agricultural fields) that they will not require removal. This grouping of trees is located approximately 0.2 mile south of 15189 Byron Highway. If the great-horned owls return to this general location in the future, they could utilize these trees that will remain in place. in addition, there are other trees in the general area that could be utilized by nesting great-horned owls. Based on the fact that the trees will be removed only when the owls are not actively nesting and there are other trees in the area that could be used for nesting sites, impacts to nesting great- horned owls as a result of the project will be less than significant. Mr.Gary Martin August 1,7000 Page 3 of 4 Comment ro: Vehicles, including large semi trucks, already using Byron Highway account for the primary source of noise along Byron Highway. The project will not Impact the total amount of vehicles that utilize the highway. No trees will be removed from in front of any residences along Byron Highway. The line of trees along the nearby home serves to provide some noise damping along the southeastern side of the home. These trees will not be impacted by the project. Because the trees adjacent to the home will continue to provide noise damping for trucks that are approaching the home from the south, removal of the trees along Byron Highway should not significantly impact the amount of noise audible from the home. Since the trees to be removed are adjacent to agricultural fields with no residences, noise impacts as a result of the project will be insignificant. Comment 7: Concerted efforts were made to design the widening project such that tree removal would not be necessary (see Comment 8); however, other options considered were determined to be infeasible. Although one of the eucalyptus trees is providing nesting habitat for great- homed owls, the trees should not be considered a part of the "natural environment". Eucalyptus trees are native to Australia and are considered somewhat invasive in the state of California. The trees were clearly planted by residents as part of the agricultural use of the area. Many birds'or prey are able to utilize agricultural areas as habitat since their main prey base (rodents) thrive in agricultural areas. Based on the fact that the trees will be removed only when the owls are not actively nesting and there are other trees in the area that could be used for nesting sites, impacts to great-horned owls as a result of the project will be less than significant. As discussed in Comment 3, the view that will remain following tree removal (large open agricultural fields punctuated with groupings of trees) is very typical of the Byron area, and east county in general and therefore, aesthetic impact due to the tree removal is less than significant. ,Comment 8: Shifting the roadway toward the railroad was considered; however, this option was dismissed based on the lack of sufficient area since the utility poles are already located at the public right of way line. In addition, the utilities on the railroad side of the highway have joint pole masts that extend well beyond the main utility pole. These joint pole masts are oriented perpendicular to Byron Highway and the railroad. Even minor movement of the poles toward the railroad would result in encroachment into the railroad's airspace. The railroad will not allow this encroachment; therefore, widening must occur on the eastern side of Byron Highway. In a further effort to minimize impacts to the trees along Byron Highway, Design engineers considered placing guardrails adjacent to the trees. This option would minimize the amount of clearance required from the edge of pavement to any stationary objects, potentially allowing at least some of the trees to remain in place. However, this option would permanently restrict access to the properties adjacent to the roadway. In addition, installation of a guardrail would be costly, and the level of maintenance associated with the guardrail would be high. Most critically, however, is the likelihood that any vehicle coming in contact with the guardrail at the high speed traveled on the roadway would likely ricochet into oncoming traffic. These concerns make installation of a guardrail an unreasonable alternative. Comment 9: Although Byron Highway is listed on the Countywide Bikeway Plan, the current configuration of the roadway is not conducive to bicycling, based on the high volume and speed of traffic, and the large number of semi trucks that use the roadway. Installation of the new shoulder will improve the conditions that a bicyclist would experience along Byron Highway. Although there is insufficient room to provide for a five-foot wide bike lane, the four-fo®t wide shoulder and 4" wide stripe will provide a wider and more clearly defined shoulder area that bicyclists could utilize. HL.t No.!D?_e V(il.:s W I(;ll Ii);t i4INtx11*2 rhA-i.UV -?Vi v11V int-fit"brand talc transmittal memo Mn r o�p ► /r 0t9� Phone July 13, 2000r q FaK . G Fa%x low Debbie Chamberlain S)0).30 &41..?I Principal Planner Contra Costa County Community Development Dept 651 Pine Street Martinez, CA 94553 SUBJECT: COMMENTS ON INTENT TO ADOPT A PROPOSED NEGATIVE DECLARATION (Byron highway Shoulder Widening-County Pile#CP 00-44) Your letter, and Initial Study of Environmental Significance Summary, states that the Byron MAC voted to remove the trees based on"community input" (4/6/00). As owner of a property where the trees front the Byron Highway, my mother, Reatha Martin, received NO request for her input on whether the trees should be removed. I understand that the trees are actually in the public 1 fight of way but shouldn't the fronting property owners, especially long term tax payers, have a say is this important issue? In regard to the importance of these trees, not only are they an important nesting place for great- 9. horned owls, I believe they're an asset to the community, having been a part of the landscape for over 50 years (that I know about). The trees also enhance the scenic view entering and leaving Byron, serve as a windbre and�sourcc o; summer sh�adlas well aslreduce noise from oassinar vehicles. Nave these factors been considered? Also, the Caltrans Highway Design Manual Topic 109-"Scenic Values in Planning and Design" (109.1-Basic Precepts) states: "Scenic values must 'be considered along with safety, utility, economy and all the other factors considered in planning, and design."; and also in (109.3-Aesthetic Factors) "The location of the new construction will preserve the natural environment and will lead to and unfold scenic positions." I'm sure the tree removal cost must be thousands of dollars. Why not preserve these trees and L; use the savings to widen the shoulder, as needed, on the opposite side of the highway instead to Let the desired room? The slight offset in alignment could be made up for by a gradual taper and shouldn'tbe that noticeable. Any additional cost savings could be used to stripe the new shoulders for Bike Lanes along the length of the project, which would be appreciated by bicyclists. Please consider the above items and preserve these important trees. Please forward your response to me at 746 Horizon Drive, Martinez, CA 94553. i (nary artln Son of Reatha Martin, property owner cc Leigh Chavez; Mark A. de la 0; Reatha Martin grmfile:byron r SlA_4 OF CALIFORNIA-BUSINESS,TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY _ BRAY DAVIS,Gave= DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BOX 23660 '; c OAKLAND,CA 94623-0660 ( TDD(510)n6-4454 80 ,,,J�J June 29, 2000 CC-Gen-ears CCO00179 SCH#2000062052 Ms. Debbie Chamberlain Contra Costa Community Development Department 651 Pine Street Martinez, CA 94553 Dear Ms. Chamberlain: Byron Highway Shoulder Widening Thank you for including the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) in the early stages of the review process for the above referenced project. We have no comments regarding this project. We appreciate the opportunity to work with you on this project. Should you require additional information or have any questions regarding this letter, please call Bonnit Braxton of my staff at (510)622-1645. Sincerely, HARRY Y.YAHATA District Director` By ��._ JEAN C. R. FiNNEY District Branch Chief IGR/CEQA Enclosure CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT NOTICE OF DETERMINATION CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 651 PINE STREET 4TH FLOOR NORTH WINO MARTINEZ,CALIFORNIA 94553-0095 Telephone: (925)313-2296 Contact Person: Cece Seli ren,Environmental Planner Project Description,Common Name(If any)and Location:Byron Highway Shoulder Widening Project, County File#CP 00-44.The project consists of a four-foot shoulder widening along both sides(east and west)of Byron Highway. The shoulder widening will extend from Byron Hot Springs Road north to Hoiway Drive (approximately 9,000 feet or 2,750 meters).The shoulder widening is being implemented in order to bring the shoulder along this section of Byron Highway up to current design standards. In order to widen the shoulder, existing shoulder backing will be removed and replaced with asphalt concrete. New shoulder backing will be installed adjacent to the asphalt concrete and tapered to existing grade. Excavation associated with the removal of the shoulder backing and replacement with asphalt concrete is not expected to exceed one foot in depth. No right of way acquisition will be necessary for the project. Construction activities associated with the shoulder widening will impact the minimum amount of vegetation necessary. There are approximately 25 Eucalyptus trees ranging in size from 4"dbh to 48"dbh that will likely require removal in order to widen the shoulder of Byron Highway. Every effort will be made to retain as many of the trees in place as feasible. in order to determine whether the removal of these trees would be of concern to the residents of Byron,the Byron Municipal Advisory Committee(MAC)was consulted by staff from the Public Works Department. The Byron MAC voted to remove the trees based on community input(4/6/00). On April 13,2000,a wildlife biologist hired by the County reviewed the Eucalyptus trees slated for removal for nesting birds(Blosearch Wildlife Surveys,Allaback,4/00). The biologist identified one great-homed owl(Bubo vtrglnfanus)nest occupied by two owlets. Great-horned owls are early nesting species,therefore,as recommended by Mr.Allaback,the trees will be removed In November or December after chicks from the previous nesting season have fledged and before adults return for the next nesting season.In order to further ensure they are free of active bird nests,the trees will be resurveyed prior to their November or December removal. The shoulder widening will not Increase the capacity of Byron Highway,and vehicles traveling on the highway will be no closer to sensitive receptor;(i.e.,homes,schools,etc.)than they are currently. A powerline Including PG&E and Pack Bell utilities runs parallel to Byron Highway in the vicinity of the project. In order to facilitate the shoulder widening,several of the poles will require relocation to the County's right of way line. The relocation will be coordinated with staff from PG&E and Pacific Bell. Project Location: The project is located along Byron Highway near the Intersection with Camino Diablo in the east county area in the community of Byron. The shoulder widening will extend from Byron Hot Springs Road north to Holway Drive. The project was approved on: Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act: { } An Environmental Impact Report was prepared and certified(SCH# ) ( ) The Project was encompassed by an Environmental Impact Report previously prepared for (SCH# ). ( X ) A Negative Declaration was prepared following identification of a potentially significant impact Copies of the record of project approval and the Negative Declaration or the final EIR may be examined at the office of the Contra Costa County Community Development Department. ( X ) The Project will not have a significant environmental effect ( ) The Project will have a significant environmental effect. ( } Mitigation measures were made a condition of approval of the project. ( ) A statement of overriding considerations was adopted. ( ) Findings were adopted pursuant to Section 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines. Date: By: Community Development Department Representative AFFIDAVIT OF FILING AND POSTING I declare that on I received and posted this notice as required by Callfomia Public Resources Code Section 21152(c). Said notice will remain posted for 30 days from the filing date. Signature Title Applicant: Department of Fish and Game Fees Due Public Works Department EIR-$850 Total Due: $ 255 Glacier Drive X_ Neg,Dec.-$1,250 Total Paid $ Martinez,CA 94553 _ Dsminimis Findings-$0 Attn:Leigh Chavez „X County Clerk-$50 Receipt#: G:\GrpData\EngSvc\ENV I RO\2008pmjom\BymnHwy\NOD ell THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Adopted this Order on August 15, 2000 by the following vote: AYES: SUPERVISORS GIOIA, UILKEMA, CANCIAMILLA AND GERBER NOES: NONE ABSENT: SUPERVISOR UESAULNIER ABSTAIN: NONE SUBJECT: Grant Permission to partially close a portion of San Pablo Darn Road, for the purpose of El Sobrante Stroll, in the El Sobrante area. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that permission is granted to El Sobrante Chamber of Commerce to completely close San Pablo Dam Road, except for emergency traffic, on September 17, 2000 for the period of 7:00 AM through 7:00 PM subject to the following conditions: 1. Traffic will be detoured via the traffic control plan approved by the Public Works Department. The El Sobrante Chamber of Commerce shall maintain a 20-foot wide unobstructed emergency lane through the entire length of the road closure to accomondate emergency vehicle operations. 2. All signing to be in accordance with the State of California Manual of Traffic Controls. 3. El Sobrante Chamber of Commerce shall comply with the requirements of the Ordinance Code of Contra Costa County. 4. Have on file with the County a Certificate of Insurance in the amount of$1,000,000 for Comprehensive General Public Liability,which names the County as an additional insured. 5. Obtain approval for the closure from the Sheriff s Department,the California Highway Patrol and the Fire District. I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. BH:kw G:\GrpData\EngSvc\BO\2000\BO 8-15-OO.doc Originator: Public Works(APC) ATTESTED: AUGUST 15, 2000 Contact: Bob Hendry(646-1607) PHIL BATCHELOR, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors cc: CHP and County Administrator Sheriff-Patrol Div.Commander By _ , Deputy THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Adopted this Order on August 15, 2000, by the following vote: AYES: SUPERVISORS GIOIA, UILKEMA, CANCIAMILLA AND GERBER NOES: NONE ABSENT: SUPERVISOR DESAULNIER ABSTAIN: NONE SUBJECT: Grant Permission to partially Close a portion of La Paloma Road, for the Purpose of street improvements for Subdivision Tract'7451, in the El Sobrante area.<RC-00-12> IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that permission is granted to JEDCO Engineering to completely close La Paloma Road, except for emergency traffic,on August 16,2000 through August 19, 2000 for the period of 8:00 AM through 5:30 PM subject to the following conditions: 1. Traffic will be detoured via the traffic control plan approved by Public Works. 2. All signing to be in accordance with the State of California Manual of Traffic Controls. 3. JEDCO Engineering shall comply with the requirements of the Ordinance Code of Contra Costa County. 4. Have on file with the County a Certificate of Insurance in the amount of$1,000,000 for Comprehensive General Public Liability,which names the County as an additional insured. 5. Obtain approval for the closure from the Sheriffs Department,the California Highway Patrol and the Fire District. R.:gpp Originator: Public works(APC) I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an Contact: Bob Hendry(646-1667) G:\GrpData\EngSvc\BO\2000\BO 8-15-60.doc action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of cc: CHP Supervisors on the date shown. Sheriff-Patrol Div.Commander ATTESTED: AUGUST 15, 2000 PHIL BATCHELOR, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors and County Administrator By Deputy