The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMINUTES - 09211999 - C232 _ ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... .......... ......... ._....... ......... ......... ........_.._....__... ............ ............ ............ .......... ............. ..... _ ......................................... .......... _ TO: BOARD OFSUPERVISORS a, � CONTRA ;s. COSTA FROW PHIL BATCHELOR, COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR COUNTY DATE. September 9, 1 99 E _ PRO OF AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY OF RICHMOND'S WELFARE-TO-WORK LO .L PLAN SPECIFIC REQUES($)OR RECOMMENDA MMS)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIMCATION RECOMMENDATION.- APPROVE ECOMMENDATION.APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Chairs Board of Supervisors, to execute the Welfare-to-Work Standard Signature Page for the City ofRichmond's Welfare-to-Work Local Pian to reflect certain amendments which have been made to the Pian. BACKGROUND: The City of Richmond has amended its Falters-to-work Local Plan to incorporate second year funding and to bring the goals more in lima with the € unty's Welfare-to-Work Program.. The Board of Supervisors is required to approve the amendment to the City's Plan before it can be submitted d to to Staten The Director, Employment and Human Services Department, John Cullen, has reviewed the proposed amendments and recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve them.F E. COBE'"RAID ON ATTACHMENT:: _ 'SES iGNATU : R j7C; MENZATION OF COUNTY ADMMSTRATOR RECOMMENDATION of BOARD Co ME APPROVE OTHER WGNATUREM.- ACTON of BOARD ON �September 21.ION e n APPROVED As REC0MN1EN0E 7_XX- OTHER VOTE OF SOPERVISORS 1 HEREBY CERIM S THAT THIS IS A TRUE XX UNAMMOUS(ABSENT - - - - - . � AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN AYES.� NOES-. AND ENTERED ON MMUTES of THE BOA ABSENT: ABSTMN. OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. Contact County Administrator ATTESTED_. Se. ember 21, Director, Employment and Human Services Department PH#L BATCHELOR,CLERK OF THE BOARD OF . Upesi eta Cuzi, Director SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADM€STRATOR fmoyrent and Training Department City of Richmond 330 25th Street; Richmond, CA 9480A By ,._,DEPUTY ��R:x.,+xG an GtyeY{W ridDM ` din of Pr34ia?�3 ;r1o`Lf�tR�J v��n�8� +� Y Employment and Training Department � 8=c�'londVVORKS15astBay Works August 23, 1999 Honorable Joseph Canciarnlla, Chair Contra Costa.Board of Supervisors 651 Pine Street Martinez,CA.94553 Dear Mr. Canaciandila: In Jane 1998,the Centra Costa Board of Supervisors approved the City ofRichmond's Welfare to Work vocal Plan. For the 1999-2000 program year,we have made revisions to incorporate second year funding and to bring goals more in line with the County's welfare-to-work program. There have been no other changes its the language and/or general content of the plane The State requires the 1999-2000 program year modification incl=ude'the signature of the Chair of the Beard of Supervisors. Please find attached herein a copy of the original 1998 Board Order as well as a copy of our 1999-2000 Plan Modification with signature pages. We respectf"inlly request your signature for this modification so that we may move forward in transitioning Conte Costa's welfare-to-work participants into viable employment, Thank you in advance for your support. Sincerely, /-j - �f 91 L esi Mtarnbuzi ). nployrnent& Tr6nirng DArecto.r cc: Richmond City Mayor,Rosemary M. Corbin Richmond City Manager,Isiah Turner :chrriond PICChair,Peter Terman County Administrator,John Cullen Deborah Dias,Welfare-to-Mork CoordirwoT STPD Program Manager,Linda Patton-Finch 330 25th Street, Richmond California 948134 telephone, (510) 307-8014 www,richmondwor s.org fax- (5 10) 307-8081 Welfare-to—Work Standard Signature Page WtW Local Plan [X] initial 1,999 Modification IEJ Other Modifications Mod. No, 001 Service Delivery Area City of Richmond Date 7/1199 The ur:cersigned Private Industry Crunch (PIC) Chair,the Chief Elected Official (CEQ)for the above l named Service Delivery Area (SDA) have approved the attached local Welfare-to-Work (WtW) Plan and agree to operate or cause to be operated programs pursuant to this plan. Additionally, the County Boards) of S°upery sor has approved the attached local WtW plan as evidenced by signature below or the attached Board Resolution. It is expected that the local plan has been developed tointly between the PIC and the County Welfare Departmer:t (CWD), and that the County r Beard of SupervIllsors considered the input of the CW=T when board action was taken. The undersigned certify that they concur with the contents or this plank and agree that Vvs plan shall be = funded Through subgrants executed between the named subgrantee arra the State of California and that no such subgrant shall be executed without their concurrence. This plan and any modification consists of the Table of Contents, and all the sections indicated by an"X"on the Table of Contents. Approved for the PIC: 1 Approved for the CEO: t (Signature) ( ignature) Peter !. 7errtkda Rosemary M. Corbin (dame) (Name) Chair mayor, City of Richr.4nd 1 (Title) 5/27' V z i ;este) � _ date For Mate use only: Approved for the bounty Board of rtrezdr tie tatexcaffR Zlfr td " Supervisors in _County z, { 4 j Board Resolution attached (riot requsred if : signed' ? i (Signature) i (S,gnature) I e (Name) (Datta) (Title) (Tltla) 3 Cbte �,at FWD99-4CI (4I99; . r rWtW Local Plan initial 1999 Modification 0 Other Modifications Mod. No. 001 ervice Delivery Area Date 711/99 _ FISCAL YEAR 199'9 EXPENDITURE PLAID Part VII— Section A (1) Expenditure Plan offal A. Total FY 1999 Allocation - $634,395 B. Planned Total Ex enditure for 70% Eligibles $444€077 C: Planned Total Expenditure for 30% Eligibles _ $190,318 D. Planned Total Administration 1 $ 82,47 E. Planned Total Information Technology 1 $ 25,000 j Fo Planned Total Program X526,924 G. Planned Cumulative Expenditures `i. First year quarter I (July 999 -Sept. '1999) _ 26.379 First year- quarter 2 (Oct. 1999 - Dec. 999) ` 253,758 3. First year- quarter 3 (Jan. 2000 a Mar. 2000) X360,637 li 4. First year quarter 4 ( pol 2000 w June 2000) $639,236 5. Second yr.-quarter 1 (July 2000 -Sept. 2000) $586,816 6. Second yr.- quarter 2 Oct. 2000 - Dec. 2000) 1 $634,395 7. Second yr,- quarter 3 (Jars. 2001 -liar. 2001 634P390 � 3. Second yr,-quarter 4 (April, 2001 -Jeune 2001) $634,396 l 9. Third yr.-quarter (July 2001 - Sept. 2001 $634,395 10,Third yr.-quarter 2 (Oct. 2001 - Dec. 2000 $634,395 l.`third yr.- quarter 3 (Jan, 2002 ., {Mara 2002) $634,395 12.Third yr.- quarter 4 (,April 2002 - June 2002) $634,395 Part Vil — Section A (2) Planned Expenditure by Actives Total Planned Activit Expenditure A. Job Readiness 58,699 B, Job Placement X56,599 Post Err ployrnent 03,440 1 , Community Service 12,688 E, Work Experience $114,191 F. Job Creation Wage Subsidies 31;719_ , On—the—Job Training $ 12,688 �. Job I etention and Support aeNlces 76,127 1. Individual Development Accounts 6,344 J. Total X34, 95 ; ........''I'll-,........................................................................................................................ .................I............................................................................................................ ................................. ,WfvV Local Plan Z Initial X999 ,Modification L7 Other Modifications Mcd. No, 001 — Service Deiivery Area City of Richmond Date 7/1199 PART V PERFORMANCE AND OVERSIGHT WAR-"al '7F a.,t00 I Ii I FY 1998 Performance Goal 'I Planned Overall Description of How the SDA Statewide Planned SDA Goal is Derived Goal Goal Entered 45% 45% Based on a,-, analysis of our Unsubsidized historical and present welfare Employment recipient 'ob placement rate. Job Retention at six 70% 150% Based or, an analysis of our months welfare recipientlob retention rate. Increase in A 10% 5% Based on our expected abilityto Earnings Rate provide post-employment career skills upgrade training and a historical and present day analysis of our welfare recipient wage rate i. at 90 days. FY 199,91 i Performance Goal I Planned Overall Description of How the SDA Statewide Planned SDA Goal is Derived Goal Goal Entered 45% : 45% Based on an analysis of our Ur'!subsidized i historical and present welfare I Employment recipient job placement rate. Job Retention at six 70% 60% Based on an analysis of our months welfare reeciplent job retention rate. Increase in ID% 5% used on our expected ability to Earnings Rate provide Post-employment career/skills upgrade training and a historical and present day analysis of our welfare recipient wage rate at 90 days, FW'L-j'99-4E9 -6- ........................