HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 08171999 - C193 BOARD CSP SUPERVISORS CONTRA COSTA COUNT
FROM: Stephen L. Weir, County Clerk-Recorder "{
Registrar of Voters
��r
DATE: August 17, 1999
SUBJECT: Consolidation of City of EI Cerrito Elections with Statewide General
Elections
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFF ICA"'iON
RECOMMEN ATIONa
APPROVE request of the City of EI Cerrito to consolidate the General Municipal Election
with Statewide General Elections subject to item 6 (below), amortization of mail inserter
equipment casts.
. FIND thatthe<e Clerk-#recorder has made progress raver the past year that will accommodate
consolidations in the following ways:
a. The increased number of ballot cards will require additional Vote counter stations.
Due to space limitations and the capacity of the current Data General computer,the
Clerk has secured sine(6)additional machines from Multnomah County, Oregon, for
0% of new cast. In addition, the Clerk has acquired a P.C. based tally system
(B.C, WIN) that will allow for these machines to be used, (This option was not
available in 1997, Contra Costa was the first County to try this system out. It has
since been successfully certified by the Secretary of Mate and installed in riverside
County.)
3. CONSIDER the fallowing qualitative issues which are expected to resultfrorn the requested
consolidation(s):
a. Timeliness. With the new B.C. Win System and a new streamlined ballot delivery
system, ballots will arrive and be counted quicker than in the past. It should be
rioted that with consolidation, a slower vote count will tape place than without
consolidation.
b. Accuracy. Additional extra staffing help will be needed to conduct consolidated
elections. however, the demand for the staff will go down in odd number years.
There are concerns about having trained temporary staff= however, we believe that
we can bring on temporary staff early enough to train there for each election.
CONTINUE:;ON ATTACHMENT X Yes SIGNATURE:
�+ RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR � RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMIMITT3 EE
APPROVE OTHER
SIGNATURES : t
ACTION OF BOARD ON A�t :�a ? g # APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED_XX_ OTHER - -
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
XX UNANIMOUS(ABSENT _ — ® ; ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD
AYES: __ NOES: OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN.
ABSENT: ABSTAIN:
ATTESTED: � P,Ce�. E_RKOF s.. !�
cc: Elections Office PHli BA CH LOTHB BOARD OF
SUPERVI R NO COUNTY MINISTRATOR
B .DEPUTY
C. Voter ImDact. While turnout at a general election is higher than the turnout at an"off
year"election, high voter turnout and long ballots result in long lines at the polls and
"voter drop-off" towards the end of the ballots and issues on the backs of some
ballot cards. Many voters have chosen to vote absentee as an attractive alternative
to waiting in long lines at the polls. Providing absentee ballots is a costly alternative
as the County must process the application, mail the ballots, and process the
returned ballots, which includes checking the signature on every ballot returned.
The inevitable increase in absentee ballots will exacerbate the already lengthy time
it takes to determine the official results of an election. The tallying of absentee
ballots delays the official canvass and, in the case of close race, can leave the
winner undetermined for several weeks.
d. Long-Range Staff, Space and Capital Planning. The Elections Office has gone
through a lengthy and successful reorganization. Defining areas of responsibility
and providing additional training have resulted in a more professional office. Long
term space needs are being addressed although there is not a defined solution at
this time. With the new B.C. Win tally system and the potential for moving towards
a P.C. based elections operations, we feel comfortable that we will not need to
replace our election software or our hardware in the foreseeable future.
4. ACKNOWLEDGE that the Clerk-Recorder attempted to find a way to "work with local
agencies to develop a fee structure that does not penalize agencies which choose to hold
elections in the odd-numbered years." While this issue was a directive of a 1997 Board
Order, County has found that the Clerk cannot structure a pricing mechanism that would
favor one election year over another.
5. ACKNOWLEDGE that with consolidations off of odd numbered years onto even numbered
years, revenues will go down significantly for odd year elections and will go up slightly for
even numbered year elections. (This issue will not have an impact on budget years 1997-
98 nor 1998-99. The first impact will be noticed in budget year 1999-2000. It is not
possible to determine the impact at this time until the full impact of consolidation is
considered. However, it is safe to assume that when a major district moves its election off
of the November, odd numbered year, any district that remains on that ballot will have to
pay a higher election charge. There will be increased pressures for many districts to follow
suit and request consolidation.)
6. ACKNOWLEDGE amortization of the cost of equipment identified in item 1 (above) over
a five year period (Elections in November, 2000,2002 and 2004) and the spread of those
costs among those agencies seeking consolidation off of November, odd numbered years
onto November, even numbered years. This funding proposal was approved by the Board
of Supervisors on March 24, 1998.
BACKGROUND:
After lengthy discussions in March, 1997,the Board denied eight requests for consolidation
upon the recommendation of the Clerk-Recorder, The Board directed the Clerk to work
with the districts to see if a way could be found to equalize costs between even and odd
years. used upon a November, 1997 County Council Opinion, the Clerk and the County
are restricted in the manner in which election billings can be formulated, The Board also
asked the Clerk-Recorder to review capital and space requirements. The Clerk has
determined that with the exception of expanding the inserting capacity of the Elections
Office, all other concerns have been, or will be addressed.
The City of El Cerrito has formally filed a resolution with our office to consolidate with the
even number year elections.