The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMINUTES - 09011998 - C33-C35 ov 002 BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS r-0,9 OF TIME COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA STATE OF CALIFORNIA Resolution Appointing Time to Hear Objections to Assessment Valuation Rall of Reclamation District No.830. Resolution No. 98/451 WHEREAS, on December 17, 1996,the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors appointed three valuation assessment commissioners to prepare an assessment valuation roll for Reclamation District No.830; WHEREAS, on July 21, 1998 , there was filed with the clerk of the Board of Supervisors an assessment roll being known and designated as Operation and Maintenance Valuation Assessment Roll of Reclamation District No.830; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED that"Tuesday, theme day of September 1998, at the hour of 2 P.M. in the Chambers of the Board of Supervisors on the First Floor of the Contra Costa County Administration Building, in the City of Martinez, County of Contra Costa, State of California, be, and the same are hereby fixed as the time and place when a meeting of the said Board of Supervisors will be held for the purpose of hearing objections to said assessment roll and the assessment valuations therein described. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that notice of such hearing shall be given by publication once a week for two successive weeks in the Led&er Dispatch, a newspaper of general circulation published in the County of Contra.Costa, State of California, said notice to be substantially in the form as attached. 1 EXHIBIT No. I Passed and Adopted this 1st day of September , 1998,by the following vote of the Board of Supervisors, to wit: Ayes: Supervisors Uilkema, Gerber, DeSaulnier, Canciamilla,-atid Rogers Moes: None Abstain: None Absent None Jim R gees, C air Board of Supervisors County of Contra Costa State of California Attest: September 1, 1998 Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa, State of California By: d--2 Deputy Clerk 2 EXHIBIT No. 1 f 19 '9e 09:5eAM HENN ETZEL L.EISS P.3/3 � NOTICE OF HEARING ON ASSESSUMNT VALUATION ROLL OF RECLAMATION DISTRICT N0.830,JERSEY ISLAND Notice is Hereby Given that as assessment roll designated as Operation and Maintenance Valuation Assessment Roll of Reclamation District No. 830,Jersey Island,was filed with the Clerk of the Bond of Superyisors of the County of Contra CO tat On JULV_211 1998 1998, and that said Board of Supervisors will mmt for the purpose of hearing any ol)jections to said Assessment Roll of Reclamation District No. 834, and the assessment valuations descr'bed therein,on Today,the 22nd day of September 2998,at the houur of 2 P.M. in the Chambers of the Board of Supervisors on the First Floor of the Conga Costa.County Administration Building in Martinez, California. No objection to such assessment valuation or to said Assessment Roll of Reclamation District No. 834 shall be considered by the Board of Supervisors,or allowed in any other action or proceeding,unless such objection is made in writing to the Board of Supervisors before the date of the hearing. Dated September 1 , 1948 Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of',the County of Contra Costa„ State of California By. Deputy Clerk PROOF OF PUBLICATION &xwd of Superylsom will (2015.5 C.C.P.) meatforthe othear- i� ° STATE OF CALIFORNIA =6=No.a30 and the assessment vgjua do- County of Contra Costa soribed therein,on w the 22nd d of as I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the 1g�,atthahourot P01",umbers of the Bo County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, upom ors on herPrat Floor and not a party to or interested in the above-entitled ,�1rlr�iatra�n dint Counin matter. Martinez,Calffomia. No objection to such assess 1 am the Principal Legal Clerk of the Ledger Dispatch andmerit va or "IdNa Brentwood News. Newspapers of general circulation, �it�o1 3 a be printed and published at 2640 Shadetands Drive in thered by the Board of City of Walnut Creek, County of Contra Costa, 94598. r�i rai+o ,or auowsd Ind a�ny unless such And which newspaper has been adjudged a newspaper of made In wdit to the Board wre general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of datagt a ing° the Contra Costa, State of California, under the date of NoWeI*hsnbygrainMat an Dated;September 1,1908 March 26, 1870. Case Number 746370. assessment rcii deftnated as Cperadon and AAahite- CUM of the Board The notice,of which the annexed is a printed copy teat in mane*v uatkm Race of of Bu son p RaN of ecistration of the County of type not smaller then nonpareil), has been published in c. 930 Jersey�tw4 was ft Centra each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not lew�d�dwIf Bun mark oaf the State crt�Ia in any supplement thereof on the following dates,to-wit: Ocunty cn By:fwtaunen Parkeatf 90 July 27, 1906,and that eak! abp o" Sg�ptamber$,15 P ' h: $apt9ber S. 15, 1 all in the year of 1998 1 certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at Walnut Creek, California. On this 15 day of September, 1998 Signature ai Ledger Dispatch and Brentwood News P D Box 2299 Antioch, CA 94531-2299 (5101757-2625 Proof of Publication of: (attached is a copy of the legal advertisement that published) TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FROM: J. MICHAEL WALFORD, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR DATE: September 1, 1998 SUBJECT: Set Gate for Public Hearing to Extend the Urgency Ordinance for the Collection of the Tri- Valley Transportation Development Area of Benefit Fee. SPECIFIC REOUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATIONS)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION I. Recommended Action: FIX September 15, 1998 at 2:00 P.M. for a public hearing to extend the interim authorization of road fees an additional 30 days until permanent fees for the Tri-Valley Transportation Development Fee Area of Benefit become effective, and DIRECT the Public Works Director to glue notice of the hearing and to file a copy of the Development Program Report for the Tri-Valley Transportation Development Fee Area of Benefit with the Clerk of the Board in accordance with Government Cade Sections 65091 and 66484. IL Financial Impact: The extension of interim authorization of road fees an additional 30 days will have no financial impact on the General Fund. The funds collected will be deposited in a trust fund account specific to the improvements to be funded by the Tri-Valley Transportation Development Fee Area of Benefit. Continued on Attachment: X SIGNATURE: r� fIN UM RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COM TT E —APPROVE —OTHER SIGNATURES : ACTION OF BARD ON 7= 1, TM APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED_X V E OF SUPERVISORS UNANIMOUS(ABSENT AYES: NOES: I hereby certify that this is a true and correct ABSENT: ABSTAIN: copy of an action taken and entered On the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the ML:eh date shown. G:\transeng\bobr98te\TVTC.doc ATTESTED: � Orig.Div: Public Works(TE) PHIL BATZ04;H f.t R, C€erk of }- the Ucard Contact: Martin Lysons-Tel.3132295 of Supervisors and County Administrator c: M.Shiu,Deputy Public Works Director Auditor/Controller fj �r .� y� flf� . rte= _ Deputy Community Development-G.$lusher y Building Inspection Public Works Accounting Set Date for Public Nearing to Extend the Tri-Valley Transportation Development Fee September 1, 1998 Page 2 Ill. Reasons for Recommendations and Background: 4n August 11, 1998, the Board of Supervisors passed a resolution forming the Tri Valley Transportation development (TVTD) Area of Benefit. In accordance] with government Code Section 65962, the fees adopted at that time will be effective on October 11, 1998 (60 days after the adoption of the fee). The Board also adopted an urgency measure as an interim authorization for fees to be collected immediately. This authorization to adopt road fees is required pursuant to Government Code Section +65962 so that potential revenues are not lost during the time remaining before the TVTD fee goes into effect. IV. Consequences of Negative Action: Failure to extend the interim authorization of road fees until permanent fees for the Tri-Valley Transportation Development Fee Area of Benefit become effective may result in a loss of potential revenues during the time remaining before the regular ordinance goes into effect. TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FROM: J. MICHAEL WALFORD, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR DATE: September 1, 1998 SUBJECT: Set Date for Public Hearing to Revise the Bay Point Area of Benefit. SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION 1. Recommended Action: FIX September 22, 1998 at 11:00 A.M. for a public hearing to revise the Say Point Area of Benefit and DIRECT the Public Works Director to give notice of the hearing and to file a copy of the Development Program Report for the Bay Point Area of Benefit with the Clerk of the Board in accordance with Government Code Sections 65091 and 66484. If. Financial Impact: The revision of the Bay Point Area of Benefit will have no financial impact on the General Fund. The funds collected will be deposited in a trust fund account specific to the improvements to be funded by the Bay Point Area of Benefit. Continued on Attachment. X SIGNATU : -,- -Rh(;FJMMt:NUA I 1UN U1- t;UUN I Y AL4MINIIKAIUK —RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD CCi MI EE —APPROVE —OTHER SIGNATURE(§)�____ ACTION OF BOARD ON 1998 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED ITTE OF SUPERVISORS UNANIMOUS{ABSENT NXP- AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ML:eh I hereby certify that this is a true and correct G:\transeng\bobr98te\BayPtAOB.doc copy of an action taken and entered on the Orig.Div: Public Works(TE) minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the Contact: Martin Lysons-Tel.313-2295 date shown. c: M.Shiu,Deputy Public Works Director ATTEST Auditor/Controller Community Development-G.Slusher PHIL rATcHA_.cii, Clerk of the Board Building Inspection of Supervisors and Col.1.0ty Administrator Public Works Accounting 4�1_6��, By Ld,&,e.&Pq r Deputy Set Date for Public Hearing to Revise the Bey Point Area of Benefit September 1, 1998 Page 2 III. Reasons for Recommendations and Background: On September 24, 1985, the Board of Supervisors passed a resolution farming the West Pittsburg (now Bay Point) Area of Benefit. At the time, there were many vacantparcels in the area with potential for residential and commercial development, and the existing transportation system was inadequate to handle the additional traffic generated from the projected';development. The Area of Benefit program has since been revised to reflect the changing needs of the area. The Bay Point area has, in recent years, experienced changes in the area's traffic circulation needs and development potential. Most of the residential development potential has been fulfilled and many of the Area of Benefit projects have been constructed. These changes have prompted another revision to the area of benefit program, resulting in a new project list and fee schedule. IV. Consequences of Negative Action: Failure to implement the revisions to the Bay Point Area of Benefit may discourage development in the Bay Point area, and the funding of future projects may be delayed.