Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 09171996 - C14 C. 14 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA DATE: September 17, 1996 MATTER OF RECORD The matter of the second amendment to the lease with Buchanan Field Airport, Concord area was deleted from the board agenda to be relisted on September 24, 1996, and the Board gave direction to the Public Works Director to provide a summary of the facts in this matter for Board consideration at the September 24, 1996, Board meeting. THIS IS A MATTER FOR RECORD PURPOSES ONLY NO BOARD ACTION TAKEN Request to Speak Form t ( THREE (3) MINUTE LIMIT) Complete this form and place It In the box near the speakers' rostrum before addressing the Board. Mame: Address: 23 S le 1 am speaking for myself or organization: Ow w d or�ntsatioN CHEONE !/a ,� I wish to speak on Agenda Item # c ^ Oat My comments will be: general _ior_ ,rainst-._._._. _ 1 wish to speak on the subject of i do not wish to speak but leave these comments for the Board to consider TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FROM: J. MICHAEL WALFORD, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR DATE: SEPTEMBER 17, 1996 SUBJECT: BUCHANAN FIELD AIRPORT - BUCHANAN EAST HANGAR COMPANY - SECOND AMENDMENT TO LEASE SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) &BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION I. Recommended Action: APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director to EXECUTE, on behalf of the County, a Second Amendment To Lease with Buchanan East Hangar Company, under the terms and conditions more particularly set forth in said Second Amendment To Lease. Il. Financial Impact: The tenant will perform approximately $15,000 of maintenance improvements at the Buchanan Field Airport. III. Reasons for Recommendations and Background: The Buchanan East Hangar Company (tenant) currently leases approximately .40 acres of land at the Buchanan Field Airport. The tenant has expressed its desire to extend its lease by an additional ten years. The tenant has agreed to complete maintenance improvements at the Airport as consideration for the lease extension. IV. Consequences of Negative Action: The lease with Buchanan East Hangar Company will not be extended, and maintenance improvements at the Airport will not be completed by the tenant. Continued on Attachment: SIGNATURE: .r _RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR _RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE(S): ACTION OF BOARD ON APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS _UNANIMOUS (ABSENT_ ) AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: HEW:DRA c:BuchEst2.amd:lca Orig Div:Airports(Dick Awenius 6-5722) cc: County Administrator Public Works Director Public Works Accounting Aviation Advisory Commit via A/P) Federal Aviation Ad i stration(via A/P) Buchanan East gar Company,tenant(via A/P) 423 Scottsdale Road SEP HX _'__LJ1 Pleasant Hill CA 94523 ng September 17, 1996 CLERKONTRA�pISORS The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF CONSENT ITEM C.14 SCHEDULED FOR THIS SEPTEMBER 17, 1996 MEETING AND OBJECTION TO ACTION ON PROPOSED ORDINANCE FROM SHORT DISCUSSION ITEM SD.3 FROM THE SEPTEMBER 10, 1996 MEETING. I, Anthony R. Tiritilli a sub-lease holder of LCA Inc. at the Concord Airport request the subject Consent Item on the Board's agenda be continued for a period of sixty days to ensure due process for the following reasons: 1. The continuation of this matter will not materially effect the County nor the leasee. This extension is believed to be significantly in advance of the expiration date of the current lease. 2. Knowledge of the County's activities in extending this East Ramp lease and a lease extension recently approved by this Board for a lease extension on the West Ramp were unknown to myself and seem to be unknown to other interested parties (sub lease holders) and appear to have elements of covert and concealment. 3. Information and potential evidence has been discovered indicating these lease extensions submitted as separate transactions by the Manager of Airports and are, in fact, a single transaction. This includes the barter of grading work promised by Mr. Alves of LCA Inc., with a reported value of$15K, in trade for approval by the Manager of Airports of the West Ramp lease extensions and the lease extensions for four units on the East Ramp. Supervisor DeSaulnier's office reported 8/28/96 a significant amount of grading work was to be performed for the approval of the West Ramp extension as well as the East Ramp extension. Two days later Supervisor Bishop's office informed another sub leasor the airport management informed them there was no connection between the two extensions. Also Mr. Alves of LCA has personally informed several of the sub leasors and others, he had to commit to perform a substantial amount of grading work to acquire approval of the West Ramp extensions as explanation of why he doubled the extension price to the sub leasors. Time is necessary to acquire detailed information from the Manager of Airports and ascertain steps which should be available to insure due process. In view of potential improprieties in the extension of the subject lease extensions, it is important this item not be permitted to be approved under the proposed Ordinance permitting County Staff blanket authority to approve leases. RECEIVED 423 Scottsdale Road Pleasant Hill CA 94523 SEF' 1 l 1996 September 17, 1996 CLERK BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Y CONTRA COSTA CO. i The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF CONSENT ITEM C.14 SCHEDULED FOR THIS SEPTEMBER 17, 1996 MEETING AND OBJECTION TO ACTION ON PROPOSED ORDINANCE FROM SHORT DISCUSSION ITEM SD.3 FROM THE SEPTEMBER 10, 1996 MEETING. I, Anthony R. Tiritilli a sub-lease holder of LCA Inc. at the Concord Airport request the subject Consent Item on the Board's agenda be continued for a period of sixty days to ensure due process for the following reasons: 1. The continuation of this matter will not materially effect the County nor the leasee. This extension is believed to be significantly in advance of the expiration date of the current lease. 2. Knowledge of the County's activities in extending this East Ramp lease and a lease extension recently approved by this Board for a lease extension on the West Ramp were unknown to myself and seem to be unknown to other interested parties (sub lease holders) and appear to have elements of covert and concealment. 3. Information and potential evidence has been discovered indicating these lease extensions submitted as separate transactions by the Manager of Airports and are, in fact, a single transaction. This includes the barter of grading work promised by Mr. Alves of LCA Inc., with a reported value of$15K, in trade for approval by the Manager of Airports of the West Ramp lease extensions and the lease extensions for four units on the East Ramp. Supervisor DeSaulnier's office reported 8/28/96 a significant amount of grading work was to be performed for the approval of the West Ramp extension as well as the East Ramp extension. Two days later Supervisor Bishop's office informed another sub leasor the airport management informed them there was no connection between the two extensions. Also Mr. Alves of LCA has personally informed several of the sub leasors and others, he had to commit to perform a substantial amount of grading work to acquire approval of the West Ramp extensions as explanation of why he doubled the extension price to the sub leasors. Time is necessary to acquire detailed information from the Manager of Airports and ascertain steps which should be available to insure due process. In view of potential improprieties in the extension of the subject lease extensions, it is important this item not be permitted to be approved under the proposed Ordinance permitting County Staff blanket authority to approve leases. RECEIVED 423 Scottsdale Road Pleasant Hill CA 94523 5tN 7 1996 September 17, 1996 CLERK BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CONTRA COSTA CO. The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF CONSENT ITEM C.14 SCHEDULED FOR THIS SEPTEMBER 17, 1996 MEETING AND OBJECTION TO ACTION ON PROPOSED ORDINANCE FROM SHORT DISCUSSION ITEM SD.3 FROM THE SEPTEMBER 10, 1996 MEETING. I, Anthony R. Tiritilli a sub-lease holder of LCA Inc. at the Concord Airport request the subject Consent Item on the Board's agenda be continued for a period of sixty days to ensure due process for the following reasons: 1. The continuation of this matter will not materially effect the County nor the leasee. This extension is believed to be significantly in advance of the expiration date of the current lease. 2. Knowledge of the County's activities in extending this East Ramp lease and a lease extension recently approved by this Board for a lease extension on the West Ramp were unknown to myself and seem to be unknown to other interested parties (sub lease holders) and appear to have elements of covert and concealment. 3. Information and potential evidence has been discovered indicating these lease extensions submitted as separate transactions by the Manager of Airports and are, in fact, a single transaction. This includes the barter of grading work promised by Mr. Alves of LCA Inc., with a reported value of$15K, in trade for approval by the Manager of Airports of the West Ramp lease extensions and the lease extensions for four units on the East Ramp. Supervisor DeSaulnier's office reported 8/28/96 a significant amount of grading work was to be performed for the approval of the West Ramp extension as well as the East Ramp extension. Two days later Supervisor Bishop's office informed another sub leasor the airport management informed them there was no connection between the two extensions. Also Mr. Alves of LCA has personally informed several of the sub lessors'and others, he had to commit to perform a substantial amount of grading work to acquire approval of the West Ramp extensions as explanation of why he doubled the extension price to the sub leasors. Time is necessary to acquire detailed information from the Manager of Airports and ascertain steps which should be available to insure due process. In view of potential improprieties in the extension of the subject lease extensions, it is important this item not be permitted to be approved under the proposed Ordinance permitting County Staff blanket authority to approve leases.