Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 09101996 - D8 5 L � TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Contra FROM: SUPERVISOR JIM ROGERS Costa County DATE: September 5, 1996 SUBJECT: SUPPORT FOR PROPOSITION 214 ON THE NOVEMBER 5, 1996 BALLOT SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATION: CONSIDER adopting the attached Resolution which establishes a position in support of Proposition 214, an initiative statute on the November 5, 1996 ballot, titled the "Health Care Patient Protection Act of 1996", which would provide additional regulations on the health care industry in an effort to protect patients from actions by HMO's and health care insurers which inappropriately limit access to needed health care. BACKGROUND: Proposition 214, a ballot initiative endorsed by Californians for Patient Rights, which is a coalition of consumers, doctors, nurses, health care workers, labor and unions, is described as the HMO Patient Rights Act. The advocates point out that its protections are crucial for consumers who rely on their physicians and insurance companies for ethical and safe health care. Attached is a letter from Californians for Patient Rights noting the groups who support the initiative and the reasons they support the measure. CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: YES SIGNATURE: RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURES C � ACTION OF BOARD ON APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER X IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that consideration of adopting a position in support of Propositions 214 and 216, providing additional regulations on the health care industry for the protection of patients from actions by HMO's and health care insurers limiting access to health is CONTINUED to September 24, 1996; and the Board DIRECTED that the Propositions are REFERRED to the County Administrator and the Health Services Department for review and report to the Board. VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE X_UNANIMOUS(ABSENT - - - - - ) AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD ABSENT: ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. ATTESTED September 10, 1996 Contact: County Administrator PHIL BATCHELOR,CLERK OF THE BOARD OF cc: Z Health Services Director SUPERVISORS A COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR B DEPUTY The Attorney General's summary of Proposition 214 notes that the measure does the following: • Prohibits health care businesses from: discouraging health care professionals from informing patients or advocating for treatment; offering incentives for withholding care; refusing services recommended by licensed caregivers without examination by the business's own professional. • Requires health care businesses to: make tax returns and other financial information public; disclose certain financial information to consumers including administrative costs; establish criteria for authorizing or denying payment for care; provide for minimum safe and adequate staffing of health care facilities. • Authorizes public/private enforcement actions. Provides penalties for repeated violations. Defines "health insurer." Attached is the analysis of Proposition 214 prepared by the Legislative Analyst which appears in the State Ballot Pamphlet. The argument in favor of Proposition 214 is signed by the Chair, State Legislative Committee of the American Association of Retired Persons (AARP); the Executive Director of Children Now; and the Issues Coordinator of the National Multiple Sclerosis Society, California Chapters. The rebuttal to the argument in favor of Proposition 214 is signed by the Legislative Director of the Seniors Coalition; a nurse at Children's Hospital in Los Angeles; and the President of the California Chamber of Commerce. The argument against Proposition 214 is signed by a nurse for Daughter of Charity; a physician in Arcadia, California; and the President of the California Chamber of Commerce. The rebuttal to the argument against Proposition 214 is signed by the President of the Orange County Chapter of the Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation; the President of the Alzheimers Association, California Council; and the Vice President of Cure Autism Now. These arguments are attached for the Board's information, along with the full text of the Proposition itself. Proposition 214 will prevent HMO's from implementing or continuing some of the more extreme measures that interfere with the doctor - patient relationship and reduce the quality of health care, solely for the purpose of making money for the HMO. I am, therefore, recommending that the Board of Supervisors adopt a position in support of Proposition 214 by approving the attached Resolution. -2- THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA IN THE MATTER OF: Supporting Proposition 214 ) on the November 5, 1996 ballot ) RESOLUTION NO. 96/ WHEREAS, health care is an important issue to the residents of the County of Contra Costa; and WHEREAS, many Contra Costa residents are enrolled in Health Maintenance Organizations or HMO's; and WHEREAS, HMO's should not be allowed to force "gag rules" on doctors and nurses, or to enforce unwritten "gag policies" by firing them without cause; and WHEREAS, HMO's should not be allowed to deny doctor-recommended treatments without a second opinion, or to offer financial bonuses to doctors and nurses to deny or delay needed care; and WHEREAS, HMO's should be required to publicly disclose profits, administrative expenses and salaries; and WHEREAS, Proposition 214, the HMO Patient Rights Initiative, is a simple, effective way to ensure that medical decisions are made by patients and their doctors - not by HMO bureaucrats; NOW, THEREFORE, be it by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors endorses the HMO Patient Rights Initiative, Proposition 214. PASSED and ADOPTED by the unanimous vote of the Board on the tenth day of September 1996. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of a resolution entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this tenth day of September 1996. Phil Batchelor, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors and County Administrator By Deputy Clerk