Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 08061996 - SD1 TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FROM: J. MICHAEL WALFORD, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR DATE: AUGUST 6, 1996 SUBJECT: Hearing on the Revision of the Bay Point Area of Benefit Fee Schedule and Boundaries. Project No. 0676-2310-6P4130; CDD-CP #95-47 RESOLUTION NO. 96/-3LI SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION I. Recommended Action: A. It is recommended that the Board take the following actions: I. ADOPT and APPROVE the Revised Development Program Report pertaining to the revision of the Bay Point Area of Benefit. 2. DETERMINE that the project is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Article 5, Section 15061(b)(3) CEQA guidelines. 3. DIRECT the Director of Community Development to file the Notice of Exemption with the County Clerk. 4. DIRECT the Public Works Director to arrange for payment of the $ 25.00 handling fee to the County Clerk for the filing of the Notice of Exemption. 5. DETERMINE that a majority protest does not exist. 6. INCORPORATE in this resolution by reference the boundaries, costs, and method of fee apportionment set forth in the Revised Development Program Report and the attached ordinance. Continued on Attachment:_ (X SIGNATURE: A1114t� _RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR _RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE (S): ACTION OF BOARD ON (1, l y 9,4 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED_OTHER_ The Public Hearing on the above matter was opened, and no one appearing to speak, the hearing was closed. VOTE OF SUPERVISORS ,/ UNANIMOUS(ABSENT ) AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: HJB:ML:ds g:4ranseng\B06BayPt.t8 Orig. Div: Public Works(VE) r hereby ser*that this to a true and eond Contact: Martin Lysons,Tel. 313-2295 an action taken and entered on the minutes lytta i ftard of SgwrvWoo on the date shown. cc: M.Shiu, Deputy PW Director ME Community Development Pf+tf.enTwf�taft c�enroftheeoani County Auditor-Controller I of sNeaaana�ow�r Treasurer-Tax Collector pap�y P.W.Accounting P.W. Design-Environmental Hearing on the Revision of the Bay Point Area of Benefit Fee Schedule and Boundaries. August 6, 1996 Page 2 1. Recommended Action: (cont.) 7. DIRECT the Director of Public Works and Auditor/Controller to continue the existing trust fund for the Bay Point Area of Benefit, that was established by Board Resolution No. 85/572 on September 24, 1985. 8. DIRECT the Public Works Department and Department of Community Development to review the fee schedule periodically, and to adjust for the effects of inflation as described in the attached ordinance. The adjustment for inflation is not subject to CEQA. 9. DIRECT the Director of Community Development to monitor future amendments to the currently adopted General Plan and their impact on traffic within the Bay Point Area of Benefit, and to report those amendments to the Public Works Director as necessary to facilitate updating of the Bay Point Area of Benefit. 10. DIRECT the Public Works Department and Department of Community Development to comply with CEQA on development applications and road projects to be constructed pursuant to the Revised Development Program Report for the Bay Point Area of Benefit. B. It is recommended that the Board ADOPT the attached ordinance, which revises the Bay Point Area of Benefit, and ordains the following: Traffic Mitigation Fees (Ordinance No. 96 - 28 ) 1 Adopt traffic mitigation fees, as recommended in the Revised Development Program Report. 2. Adjust the fee schedule every year that the Area of Benefit is in effect, to account for the affects of inflation and that at no time will the fee schedule be increased at a rate of more that 5% per year. II. Financiallmaact: The total estimated cost of the road improvement projects identified in the Revised Program Development Report for the Bay Point area, is approximately $2.6 million. The proposed projects however, will only be partially funded by Bay Point Area of Benefit fees. Adoption of the revised Area of Benefit will generate approximately $2.0 million for road improvement projects, when all the fees are collected by the year 2010 target date. Other sources will fund the remaining project costs. III. Reasons for Recommendations and Background: On September 24, 1985, the Board of Supervisors passed a resolution forming the West Pittsburg Area of Benefit (now referred to as the Bay Point Area of Benefit). At the time, there was a great deal of potential residential development and the existing transportation system was inadequate to handle the additional traffic generated from the projected development. Then, in 1991, the Area of Benefit program was revised to reflect the changing needs of the area. Over the past 15 years, Bay Point Area of Benefit fees have helped pay for improvements to Willow Pass Road, Bailey Road, Port Chicago Highway, Pacifica Avenue and Driftwood Drive. The Bay Point Area of Benefit has, over the past five years, experienced changes in the area's traffic circulation needs and development potential. Most of the residential development potential has been built and many of the area of benefit Hearing on the Revision of the Bay Point Area of Benefit Fee Schedule and Boundaries. August 6, 1996 Page 3 III. Reasons for Recommendations and Background: (Cont.) projects have been built or are no longer needed. These changes have prompted another revision to the area of benefit program resulting in a new project list and fee schedule. There are also needed boundary modifications. The area being added to the Bay Point Area of Benefit was formerly in the Pittsburg/Antioch subarea of the East County Regional Area of Benefit. This area is south of Pittsburg and north of Concord. Much of this area is part of the Keller Landfill Project. The remaining portion of the added area is generally preserved for open space or has very low development potential. Government Code Section 66484 and Division 913, Title 9 of the Contra Costa County Ordinance Code provide for assessing and collecting fees for bridge and/or major thoroughfare construction within a designated area of benefit and as a condition of issuing a building permit. The Public Works Director and Director of Community Development have completed a Revised Development Program Report for the Bay Point Area of Benefit, which was filed with the Clerk of the Board. Notice of the hearing was duly given in accordance with Government Code Sections 54986, 65091, 66016, and 66484. IV. Consequences of Negative Action: Failure to revise the Bay Point Area of Benefit may result in the loss of crucial road funds needed to construct necessary road improvements for the area. HJB:ML:ds gA1ranseng1B06BayPU8 f�CORDf� AT RUE OE Recording Requested By: Contra costa County 96 AUG 15 1996 Return To: 1.52750AT/':') O'CLOCK M. CONTRA COSTA COUNT RECORDS Board of Supervisors STEPHEN L. WEIR 651 Pine St., ROOM 106 COUNTY RECORDER Martinez, CA 94553 EEE. uF 9L Document Title(s) ORDINANCE NO. 96-28 BAY POINT AREA OF BENEFIT Ordinance No. 96 -28 Bay Point Area of Benefit The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County ordains as follows: SECTION I. SUMMARY. This ordinance provides for the revision of the Bay Point Area of Benefit, and the adoption of fees to be collected from developments proposed in the Bay Point Area of Benefit located in unincorporated Contra Costa County to fund road improvements. SECTION II. REPLACEMENT. Within the Fee Area, Ordinances 91-59 and 93-24 shall be repealed and replaced by this ordinance. SECTION III. AUTHORITY. This ordinance is enacted, in part, pursuant to Government Code Section 66484 and Division 913, Title 9, of the Contra Costa County Ordinance Code. SECTION IV. NOTICE AND HEARING. This ordinance was adopted pursuant to the procedure set forth in Government Code Sections 54986, 65091, 66016, 66017 and 66484, and Division 913, Title 9, of the Contra Costa County Ordinance Code, and all required notices have been properly given and public hearings held. SECTION V. FEE ADOPTION. The following fees to fund road improvements are adopted for the Bay Point Area of Benefit, as established by Resolution 96 /361 dated August 6, 1996 and shall apply to all development within the Fee Area: Bay Point Area of Benefit: _Land Use Recommended Fee Single Family Residential $3,683 per Dwelling Unit Multi Family Residential $2,952 per Dwelling Unit Commercial $7.06 per square foot gross floor area Light Industrial $4.08 per square foot gross floor area Heavy Industrial $2.65 per square foot gross floor area Other $3,683 per peak hour trip Fees shall be collected when building permits are issued in accordance with Section 913- 4.204 of Title 9 (Subdivisions) of the Contra Costa County Ordinance Code. SECTION VI. FEE AREA. The fee area shall include all of the unincorporated area within the Bay Point Area of Benefit with the following exception: 1. Any development required under conditions of approval to construct certain off- site road improvements in lieu of fee payment. The revised boundaries of the Bay Point Area of Benefit as established by Resolution No. 96/ 361 adopted August 6, 1996 are described in Exhibit A attached to this ordinance. SECTION VII. SENIOR HOUSING. Nothing in this Ordinance shall be construed to abridge or modify the Board's discretion, upon proper application for senior housing or congregate care facilities pursuant to Government Code Section 65915, to adjust or waive the fees provided for within this ordinance. SECTION VIII. PURPOSE AND USE OF FEES. The purpose of the fees described in this ordinance is to generate funds to finance improvements to certain bridges and major thoroughfares in the Bay Point area. The fees will be used to finance the road improvements listed in the Revised Development Program Report. As discussed in more detail in the Report, there is a reasonable relationship between the fees and the types of development projects that are subject to the fees in that the development projects will generate additional traffic on bridges and major thoroughfares in the Bay Point area, thus creating a need to expand, extend or improve existing bridges and major thoroughfares and a need to construct new bridges and major thoroughfares to mitigate adverse traffic and infrastructure impacts that would otherwise result from such development projects. SECTION IX. SEVERABILITY. If any fee or provision of this ordinance is held invalid or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, that holding shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining fees or provisions, and the Board declares that it would have adopted each part of this ordinance irrespective of the validity of any other part. SECTION X. REVIEW OF FEES. Project cost estimates shall be reviewed every year that the Bay Point Area of Benefit is in effect. The fee schedule shall be adjusted annually to account for inflation using the State of California Construction Cost Index as published annually by the California Department of Transportation. At no time will the fee schedule be increased at a rate of more than 5% per year due to inflation. SECTION XI. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall become effective 60 days after passage, and within 15 days of passage, shall be published once with the names of the Supervisors voting for and against it in the Contra Costa Times, a newspaper of general circulation published in this County. Pursuant to Section 913-6.026 of the Contra Costa County Ordinance Code, the Clerk of the Board shall promptly file a certified copy of this ordinance with the County Recorder. SECTION XII. EXISTING FEE. The replacement of Resolutions 91879 and 93/104 shall not affect fees accrued thereunder prior to the effective date of this ordinance, and such fees shall remain subject to payment and collection when building permits are issued in accordance with Section 9134.204 of Title 9 (Subdivisions) of the Contra Costa County Ordinance Code. PASSED and ADOPTED on August 6, 1996 by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors Rogers, Bishop, DeSaulnier, Torlakson, Smith NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Attest: Phil Batchelor, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors and County Administrator BY: , 0 0 HJB:Milds Deputy Bo r air oftnsengMayPt ORD.17 Bay Point Area of Benefit W. O. #4130 EXHIBIT "A" All that real property situated in the City of Pittsburg and in the unincorporated area of Contra Costa County, California, described as follows: Reference to maps, boundary lines, and ownerships are to records of said County. Beginning on the north right-of-way line of State Freeway Route No. 4 at the southwest comer of Subdivison 4137 Willow Landing recorded February 25, 1972 in Book 144 of Maps at page 14, being a point on the City of Pittsburg boundary; thence from the Point of Beginning along said City boundary in a general northeasterly direction 35,000 feet, more or less, to the Solano/Contra Costa County boundary; thence along said County boundary in a general westerly direction 35,000 feet, more or less, to the northerly prolongation of the west line of Section 5, Township '2 North, Range 1 West, Mount Diablo Meridian; thence along said prolongation and west line, southerly 7,000 feet, more or less, to the southwest corner of said Section 5, being a point on the centerline of Port Chicago Highway; thence along the west line of Section 8 (T2N, R1 W), southerly 410 feet, more or less, to the south right-of-way line of Contra Costa Canal; thence along said Canal right-of-way in a general southwesterly direction 20,000 feet, more or less, to the City of Concord boundary; thence along said City boundary in a general southeasterly direction 1,000 feet, more or less, to the north right-of-way line of State Freeway Route No. 4; thence along said north line in a general easterly direction 5,025 feet, more or less, to the west 1/4 comer of Section 16, Township 2 North, Range 1 West, Mount Diablo Meridian; thence along the west line of Section 16 (T2N, R1W), southerly 1,200 feet, more or less to the southwest comer of Parcel A as shown on the map of Subdivision MS 9-83 filed January 20, 1984 in Book 109 of Parcel Maps at page 10, said point lying on the boundary of the United States Naval Reservation; thence along said Naval Reservation boundary in a general southeasterly direction 20,650 feet, more or less to the southwest comer of Parcel A as shown on the map of Subdivision MS 15-89 filed November 22, 1991, in Book 155 of Parcel Maps at page 44; thence along the southerly and easterly boundary of said Parcel A(155 PM 44), 9,623 feet, more or less to the southeast comer of Parcel B as shown on the map of Subdivision MS 243-73 filed March 18, 1974, in Book 32 of Parcel'Maps at page 42; thence along the easterly boundary of said Subdivision MS 243-73 in a general northerly direction 8,971 feet, more or less, to the south right of way line of the Contra Costa Canal; thence along said Canal right of way in a general westerly direction 4,350 feet ,more or less, to the-east line of Section 14, Township 2 North, Range 1 West, Mount Diablo Meridian; thence along said east line of Section 14 (T2N, R1 W), in a general northerly direction 940 feet, more or less, to the north right of way line of State Freeway Route No. 4; thence along said north line, easterly 1,500 feet, more or less, to the Point of Beginning. JH:jlg g:\c1edca1lexhNds\4130.bp 6/17/96 m =r � zr mnm O -1 -0 - 2fA03 - D cn �m p0 a zcn CDc c= m-00NEW �-��N �� i w 0 -np z I-+ fD m--� O 0 n z C M Fd, b x MO O SD 'O c n n K - ."'1. N. _ ? m $ OC C+ E sr vl \ /\ /` V) (D�D n c0 mm� fC ^D 000 CL C37 W. ` J � U=3 �< -nm N � � O ^�[' PL OL N m 3 r �° w C:V m Kms°- D 3 ~• -m m 0 Ic m 3 � � F3+ fD C� (� N O 0 m .+ ro 0 CD N ad$ 0 m O r m mrn Z >< rn yy� z m m ° _� rt N m� 0Oc —� o�U) < p Som O� O m O� N "� � Zn cn hd m y ti N Z C/) m e j W m cn W $moo N F °o i D , Q M � m00zm < w � mc o C CD �-c m D m U) co D m W c ° �• < z cn -o 070 c <z � 'p %< z it 0 rt m r O ��i fu O R r Ft 41. O O (D N00 f D m z o � Ul V - � 0 z Z D c -1 D� 0 U) D TD ]J 2 --�c o=, x �mDW w zz M� r m m � O� aM m -D+ p mo 0 O D m v mn m C -i D z -� _ c m o Z D m0 m = Z Z 0 z r- -q m H m zz o ZO r' p m 2 �m O N D O O O� O �y -o C ►-► rt � 9 m ? O m m QVi m 00 M C m xC Ln v m-.� m Z fD {v IL4 v N mN OT Q+ c O w m w 1 r 0 Z D V m Zr 1 D cm v W Q D �1 D .�. O m-I mo x m z rr D f 1�. C) /}l1,46I 00 ADOPTED BY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON August 6, 1996 REVISED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM REPORT FOR THE BAY POINT AREA OF BENEFIT PROVIDING FUNDING FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MAJOR THOROUGHFARE IMPROVEMENTS IN THE BAY POINT AREA PREPARED PURSUANT TO SECTION 913 COUNTY ORDINANCE CODE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENTS August 6, 1996 • SW REVISED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM REPORT FOR THE BAY POINT AREA OF BENEFIT PURSUANT TO THE BRIDGE CROSSING AND MAJOR THOROUGHFARES FEE AREA POLICY INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE The Bay Point Area of Benefit (formerly the West Pittsburg Area of Benefit) is a development program to maintain and improve the capacity and safety of the arterial road network in the unincorporated area of Bay Point. This ordinance applies to all new development within the unincorporated area of Bay Point. This Revised Development Program Report is required by the Board of Supervisors Policy on Bridge Crossings and Major Thoroughfare Fees (adopted July 17, 1979) which implements Division 913 of the County Ordinance Code and Section 66484 of the State Subdivision Map Act. One of the objectives of the County General Plan is to relate new development directly to the provision of community facilities necessary to serve that development. In other words, development cannot be allowed to occur unless a mechanism is in place to provide the funding for the infrastructure necessary to serve that development. The Bay Point Area of Benefit is a means of providing funds to construct road improvements to serve new residential, commercial and industrial development. Requiring that all new development pay a road improvement fee will help ensure that they participate in the cost of improving the road system. Each new development or expansion of an existing development will generate new traffic. Where the existing road system is inadequate to meet future needs based on new development, improvements are required to meet the new demand: The purpose of this development program is to determine improvements ultimately required by estimated future development and to require developers to pay a fee to fund these improvements. Because the fee is based on the relative impact on the road system and the costs of the necessary improvements to mitigate this impact, the fee amount is roughly proportional to the development impact. This report discusses the basis of that fee amount. BACKGROUND On September 24, 1985, the Board of Supervisors passed a resolution forming the West Pittsburg Area of Benefit (now referred to as the Bay Point Area of Benefit). At the time, there was a great deal of potential residential development and the existing transportation system was inadequate to handle the additional traffic generated from the projected development. Then, in 1991, the Area of Benefit program was revised to reflect the changing needs of the area. Over the past 15 years, Area of Benefit fees have helped pay for improvements to Willow Pass Road, Bailey Road, Port Chicago Highway, Pacifica Avenue and Driftwood Drive. 2 0 SW The Bay Point Area of Benefit has, over the past five years, experienced changes in the area's traffic circulation needs and development potential. Most of the residential development potential has been built and many of the area of benefit projects have been built or are no longer needed. These changes have prompted another revision to the area of benefit program resulting in a new project list and fee schedule. There are also needed boundary modifications. The area being added to the Bay Point Area of Benefit was formerly in the Pittsburg/Antioch subarea of the East County Regional Area of Benefit. This area is south of Pittsburg and north of Concord. Much of this area is part of the Keller Landfill Project. The remaining portion of the added area is generally preserved for open space or has low development potential. AREA OF BENEFIT - LOCATION Figure 1 shows the general location of the Area of Benefit within Contra Costa County. AREA OF BENEFIT BOUNDARY The Area of Benefit boundary is shown in Figure 2 and described in Exhibit A. COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 66001 (a) OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE 1) PURPOSE OF THE FEE The purpose of this area of benefit is to generate monies through the adoption of a traffic mitigation fee to ensure a roadway network consistent with current and future transportation needs. By adoption of this fee, the proposed road improvement program will be able to keep pace with new growth. 2) USE OF THE FEES The fees will be used to generate monies to pay for the road improvements described in Exhibit B. This Area of Benefit will only finance the minimum interim roadways needed to meet traffic level of service and safety demands. Amenities which do not have a direct effect on capacity, such as, general lighting, extensive longitudinal storm drain systems, and sidewalks, are not included. These improvements are considered as frontage improvements by the Board of Supervisors and as such are the responsibilities of the owners of the adjacent properties. As these properties develop, the frontage improvements may be provided through development conditions of approval, or by other future means such as additional fees or assessment districts. 3 0 so ,i 3) RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN USE OF FEES AND TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT PROJECT The road improvement projects for which the fees will be used are necessary for the improvement of the safety and the capacity of the road network serving the unincorporated Bay Point area as determined by future growth allowed for in the General Plan. The road network is outlined in the Circulation Element of the General Plan. 4) RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN NEED FOR ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT A peak trip generation factor has been associated for each type of development outlined in this program report. These factors are industry standards obtained from the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation, 5th Edition. The proposed fee is based on distributing the cost of the Area of Benefit road improvement program to new development in proportion to the number of peak hour trips generated by the particular type of new development. All new development will be required to pay a fee to fund the needed roadway improvements. GENERAL PLAN RELATIONSHIP The basis for the Bay Point Area of Benefit is derived from the features of the County General Plan and its amendments, and subscribes to the policies of the General Plan elements. The General Plan and its various elements are available for review at the Community Development Department, County Administration Building, 651 Pine Street, Martinez, during office hours. ROAD NETWORK CAPACITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN The road network capacity improvement program was developed using the Circulation Element, and the development potential identified in the County General Plan. The road improvements will be funded and constructed in conjunction with the development of property within the Area of Benefit. The proposed projects however, are only partially funded by Bay Point Area of Benefit fees. The rate of revenue generated in the Bay Point Area of Benefit is dependent on the rate of new development. This affects the timing of the construction of an Area of Benefit project as it is dependent on the total amount of fees collected less expenditures. Other sources of funding, such as State or Federal aid, or local sources such as sales tax, gas tax, etc., will be pursued. The proposed road plan will help to provide the capacity needed to serve the estimated potential development and future traffic volumes in the Bay Point area. This Area of Benefit will finance only the minimum interim roadways needed to meet traffic level of service and 4 • SDI safety demands. The road capacity improvement programs proposed by the Bay Point Area of Benefit will be reviewed periodically to assess the impacts of changing travel patterns, the rate of new development, and the adequacy of the estimated road improvement project costs. DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL WITHIN THE AREA OF BENEFIT The development potential for the Area of Benefit was estimated by the County Public Works Department using the General Plan and other resources provided by the County Community Development Department. A summary of the potential new residential dwelling units, and commercial, office, and industrial development are shown in Table 1. Table 1 Summary of Development Potential Category Floor Area Or Units Single Family Residential 203 Dwelling Units Multi-Family Residential 146 Dwelling Units Commercial 56,906 Square Feet Light Industrial 71,280 Square Feet Industrial 44,457 Square Feet ESTIMATED COST OF ROAD NETWORK IMPROVEMENTS The estimated Bay Point Area of Benefit contribution shown in Exhibit B is only a portion of the total project cost. The area of benefit will only fund the "fair share" portion of the project attributable to new development. Also, the area of benefit will not fund items which do not have a direct effect on safety or capacity, such as general lighting, extensive longitudinal storm drain systems, and sidewalks. The area of benefit will only finance the minimum interim roadways needed to meet traffic level of service and safety demands. The estimated Bay Point Area of Benefit contribution has been increased by approximately 2% to cover the cost of administration. This includes the estimated staff time for fee collection, accounting, and technical support to the community groups and traffic advisory committees. BASIS FOR FEE APPORTIONMENT The concept of an area of benefit is the equitable distribution of road improvement costs to new development from which future traffic impacts will arise. As traffic impacts are directly related to the total number of vehicles on the road network, we are able to relate development road fees to the number of vehicle trips associated with a particular category of development. To summarize, the six categories of land use for which a fee will be assessed in the Bay Point Area of Benefit, are: single and multi-family residential, 5 SW commercial, light industrial, industrial and "other." The total estimated Area of Benefit share of the project costs is divided by the number of peak hour trips generated by each category. In the residential categories, the cost is equally distributed among all dwelling units. In the non-residential categories, the cost is distributed on the basis of each square foot of gross floor area. For the"other" category, the fee would be based on the number of peak hour trips generated by the particular type of development. A traffic report prepared by a licensed engineer and reviewed by the Public Works Department would be required to analyze the project's impact during the peak traffic hours. The project would then be charged the peak hour trip rate for the Area of Benefit multiplied by the number of peak hour trips identified in the traffic report. CALCULATION OF FEES The costs of the road improvement program have been distributed to the respective land use category in proportion to the number of peak hour trips generated by that category. The fee calculation is shown in Table 2 below. Table 2 Bay Point Area of Benefit Fee Calculation Land Use Units or Peak Hour Trips %Trips Cost Share Fee Square Factor Feet Single Family 203 1.0 203 37.6% $747,714 $3,683 Multi-Family 146 0.8 117 21.7% $430,949 $2,952 Commercial 56,906 0.0019 109 20.2% $401,482 $7.06 Light Industrial 71,280 0.0011 79 14.6% $290,982 $4.08 Industrial 44,457 0.0007 32 5.9% $117,866 $2.65 All Others 1.0 $3,683 TOTAL 540 $1,988,993 6 0 SDII RECOMMENDED FEES The recommended fees for the Bay Point Area of Benefit, resulting from the Table 2, are shown below. Single Family Residential: $3,683 per dwelling unit Multi-Family Residential: $2,952 per dwelling unit Commercial: $7.06 per SF of gross floor area Light Industrial: $4.08 per SF of gross floor area Industrial: $2.65 per SF of gross floor area Other: $3,683 per peak hour trip REVIEW OF FEES Project cost estimates will be reviewed periodically while the Bay Point Area of Benefit is in effect. The fee schedule will be adjusted annually to account for inflation using the State of California Construction Cost Index as published annually by the California Department of Transportation. At no time will the fee schedule be increased at a rate of more than 5% per year for inflation. COLLECTION OF FEES Fees will be collected when the building permit is issued in accordance with Section 913-4.204 of Title 9 (Subdivisions) of the Contra Costa County Ordinance Code. Fees collected will be deposited in an interest-bearing account already established by the Board of Supervisors on September 24, 1985. INTEREST ON FEES The interest accrued on the fees collected in the Bay Point Area of Benefit, will continue to accumulate in the trust account and will be used for the purpose of administration, design and construction of the fee area improvements. IN LIEU DEDICATION A development may be required to construct a portion of the road improvement identified in Exhibit B. In such a case the developer may be eligible to receive credit or reimbursement toward the Area of Benefit fee. The developer should contact the Public Works Department prior to the commencement of construction to determine the eligibility of the road improvement. NW/MUds gATransEng\BayPt RpU7 Attachments 7 cep ,1 t� '• Y a Nds N°p , ,,, dor ,,•� - ... ��m is •� N��a ....\ �%'pb ° i W o i y \ }� •ii . Sc 6 a i a 11 14 V tst t f r� W 000 i uo ' 4 y 40 j Y S V • � .\ 4 w n ¢ z cBSc ✓ .n e s / ar0 aaa. 4�p,1 / N 4r r •NVQ -110 111 3TlIASH 2WOS •+'GUN .5`' �`_ c, cr- SSVd 2 V r N S Q. � r O-k 06- A IQ r Qa i o L �N OZUl 0 o Q zito a� � OP sc'd- >g -z,-- --1 JN Z Y w 0- d d 0 d Bay Point Area of Benefit W. O. #4130 EXHIBIT "A" All that real property situated in the City of Pittsburg and in the unincorporated area of Contra Costa County, California, described as follows: Reference to maps, boundary lines, and ownerships are to records of said County. Beginning on the north right-of-way line of State Freeway Route No. 4 at the southwest corner of Subdivison 4137 Willow Landing recorded February 25, 1972 in Book 144 of Maps at page 14, being a point on the City of Pittsburg boundary; thence from the Point of Beginning along said City boundary in a general northeasterly direction 35,000 feet, more or less, to the Solano/Contra Costa County boundary; thence along said County boundary in a general westerly direction 35,000 feet, more or less, to the northerly prolongation of the west line of Section 5, Township '2 North, Range 1 West, Mount Diablo Meridian; thence along said prolongation and west line, southerly 7,000 feet, more or less, to the southwest corner of said Section 5, being a point on the centerline of Port Chicago Highway; thence along the west line of Section 8 (T2N, R1 W), southerly 410 feet, more or less, to the south right-of-way line of Contra Costa Canal; thence along said Canal right-of-way in a general southwesterly direction 20,000 feet, more or less, to the City of Concord boundary; thence along said City boundary in a general southeasterly direction 1,000 feet, more or less, to the north right-of-way line of State Freeway Route No. 4; thence along said north line in a general easterly direction 5,025 feet, more or less, to the west 1/4 corner of Section 16, Township 2 North, Range 1 West, Mount Diablo Meridian; thence along the west line of Section 16 (T2N, R1W), southerly 1,200 feet, more or less to the southwest corner of Parcel A as shown on the map of Subdivision MS 9-83 filed January 20, 1984 in Book 109 of Parcel Maps at page 10, said point lying on the boundary of the United States Naval Reservation; thence along said Naval Reservation boundary in a general southeasterly direction 20,650 feet, more or less to the southwest corner of Parcel A as shown on the map of Subdivision MS 15-89 filed November 22, 1991, in Book 155 of Parcel Maps at page 44; thence along the southerly and easterly boundary of said Parcel A (155 PM 44), 9,623 feet, more or less to the southeast corner of Parcel B as shown on the map of Subdivision MS 243-73 filed March 18, 1974, in Book 32 of Parcel Maps at page 42; thence along the easterly boundary of said Subdivision MS 243-73 in a general northerly direction 8,971 feet, more or less, to the south right of way fine of the Contra Costa Canal; thence along said Canal right of way in a general westerly direction 4,350 feet ,more or less, to the-east line of Section 14, Township 2 North, Range 1 West, Mount Diablo Meridian; thence along said east line of Section 14 (T2N, R1 W), in a general northerly direction 940 feet, more or less, to the north right of way line of State Freeway Route No. 4; thence along said north line, easterly 1,500 feet, more or less, to the Point of Beginning. JH-jig gAc1erica1\exhibits\4130.bp 6/17/96 Exhibit"B" Bay Point AOB Project List Project/ Road Project Description Estimated Bay Point Name Area of Benefit Project Contribution Canal Road Replace bridge at Contra Costa Canal; $125,000 improve Alves Lane to conform with new bridge Port Chicago Reconstruct and re-stripe from Pacifica $50,000 Highway Avenue to McAvoy Road Bailey Road Modify intersection at Willow Pass Road $20,000 to facilitate dual left turns onto Willow Pass Road Pacifica Avenue Construct improvements at Rio Vista and $150,000 Riverview Schools Evora Road Widen from Willow Pass Road (Concord) $1,843,993 to Pomo Street Willow Pass Road Construct signal at Mary's Avenue $100,000 Port Chicago Intersection Improvements at McAvoy $61,000 Highway Road Total Estimated Bay Point Area of Benefit Project Contribution = $2,349,993 Unencumbered Balance = $400,000 Funding to be Generated by New Development = $1,949,993 2% Administration = $39,000 Total Revenue Generated by Fees from New Development = $1,988,993 11 IGURE 1 � 1 CD i . 0 O O G t CID C� U a p U CD T Y C O J . 5; C G t. CO Q O p4 u!`t U ° O a O � © CDCL. m0 ,_. d U , o o 7- O U Q J 5,m / ✓ A- CD 04 (X} p r O 7 U_ O ,G ¢ O- O O Contra Public Works Department Watford J�way Costa 255 Glacier Drive Milton F Kubi Martinez, CA 94553-4897 e g County Patricia R McNamee Deputy-Operati— Maurice M.Sbiu Deputy-Transportation July 1, 1Pe LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL To: Dave Suico File: SeME170 WO# Gert CP#3p4fi 4O?-0 WE ARE SENDING YOU: ✓ Attached, the following items: Copies Description 1 COMPLETE SET OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS, WHICH MUST BE ATTACHED TO YOUR BOARD ORDER. In order to expedite this portion of the environmental process, please follow these steps: 1.) Please prepare a DRAFT board order for my review prior to finalizing. 2.) When the FINAL board order has been prepared and is ready to be submitted to the board, please attach a complete set of environmental documents to it. 3.) Please advise me of the scheduled board date and provide me with a copy of the final board order. If you have any questions regarding this process, please call me. Thank you. Signed: Janet Frattini Design Division Phone: 3-2293 c:\envforms%envtrans CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT Notice of Exemption Contra Costa County Community Development Department 651 Pine Street, 4th Floor - North Wing, McBrien Administration Building Martinez, CA 94553-0095 Telephone: (510) 313-2296 Contact Person: Vickie Germany - Public Works Dept. Project Description, Common Name (if any) and Location: GENERAL ADMINISTRATION AREAS OF BENEFIT REVISION, County File #CP 95-47: The activity consists only of revising existing Areas of Benefit (AOB's) boundaries and creating new AOB's. The AOB's are fee collection mechanisms only that are area specific and based on projected infrastructure needs. Due to changes in the development potential, development pattern, and traffic circulation needs in the County, boundary revisions are needed. Individual AOB's will be created that will have their own ordinance and fee schedules based on their own development potential and traffic circulation needs. The Public Works Department and the Community Development Department will review the fee schedules every January 1 that the AOB's are in effect and will adjust for inflation. The adjustment for inflation is not subject to CEQA. Once sufficient funds have been collected to design a given project, the proposed improvements will be covered by an appropriate project specific CEQA document. Following are representative projects that may occur within AOB's: (1) roadway widening, extensions, or realignments, (2) bridge widening or construction of new bridges, (3) signalization of intersections, upgrade of signals, and/or interconnection of signals, (4) alignment studies for roadways. Subject project is located in portions of West, Central, and South County areas. This project is exempt from CEQA as a: Ministerial Project (Sec. 15268) Other Statutory Exemption, Section _ Declared Emergency (Sec. 15269(a)) XX General Rule of Applicability(Section 15061(b)(3)) Emergency Project (Sec. 15269(b) or (c)) Categorical Exemption, Class _ Section _ It can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity may have a significant adverse effect on the environment. Date: By: Community Development Department Representative AFFIDAVIT OF FILING AND POSTING I declare that on I received and posted this notice as required by California Public Resources Code Section 21152(c). Said notice will remain posted for 30 days from the filing date. Signature Title Applicant: County Public Works Department Department of Fish and Game Fee - Exempt 255 Glacier Drive Martinez, CA 94553 County Clerk Fee $25 Due Receipt # Attn: Janet Frattini Form 1024.1 B DETERMINATION THAT AN ACTIVITY IS EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) FILE NO. 0676-2310-6P4070 CP NO. 95- ACTIVITY NAME: General Administration Areas of Benefit Revision DATE: June 27, 1995 PREPARED BY: Janet Frattini This activity is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Article 5, Section 15061 (b) (3) of the CEQA Guidelines. It can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity may have a significant adverse effect on the environment. DESCRIPTION OF THE ACTIVITY: The activity consists only of revising existing Areas of Benefit (AOB's) boundaries and creating new AOB's. The ABO's are fee collection mechanisms only that are area specific and based on projected infrastructure needs. Due to changes in the development potential, development pattern, and traffic circulation needs in the County, boundary revisions are needed. Individual AOB's will be created that will have their own ordinance and fee schedules based on their own development potential and traffic circulation needs. The Public Works Department and the Community Development Department will review the fee schedules every January 1 that the AOB's are in effect and will adjust for inflation. The adjustment for inflation is not subject to CEQA. Once sufficient funds have been collected to design a given project, the proposed improvements will be covered by an appropriate project specific CEQA document. Following are representative projects that may occur within AOB's: (1) roadway widening, extensions, or realignments, (2) bridge widening or construction of new bridges, (3) signalization of intersections, upgrade of signals, and/or interconnection of signals, (4) alignment studies for roadways. LOCATION: Portions of West, Central, South and East County areas are included (see attached figures). REVIEWED BY:--,= DATE: Vickie Germany, Environmental Planner APPROVED BY: 2 _ �''.` ��;� DATE: Community Development Re resentative Odeterminlaobrev.det (form revised 4/13/95) 000 A .\ ............. .......... ............ .................... o ZD o 02 0 44 0 o Co- 0 tot 5 Q) :D 00 7 00 L) vs 4v CL- Ile 04 C-D 05 0 r) -7 W—s 'Or- s 0 ,90- cc' 0 to--i 0- � 1 J) 2 I 1, — I i" I .11 4 I:::�'.� i i: `:^' ,+A�,.t. .yt r. .t .�)�;+:::• ,'jam _ Q � r. } c: z t' lcxcJtai z a ; • .� �. j y� e�, Imo, ati' •, 7l< all -I Lolv W I Z LL Q -I-- — --� —! W —+ I LU pC I `. r ° t, :.I s F I � �, ° IP a I• cc I --- x MF �' �♦��, a 1w � �7,tc' �1�^4/<� .3,t�e:�, ,4w, jky FIGURE 3 .tt ALHAMBRA VALLEY/RELIEZ VALLEY "c° U29 ♦ AREA OF BENEFIT sT N e° P t N Costa `N P Avon Cl yd. JOHN MARTINEZ Q PA 'NEkWAY ^1 sPc NOT TO SCALE D O� RD �cyFc� CJ �Q PACHECO FIE y 4V �`� CENTEtt ( '9� V GO�CORo I y av ALHgIyBRq Al ALLEY R �� NOGAL O - Al c CONCORD b8 xv � 1 ® X09 1 GREGORY , 9� cc LAME �. a PLEASANT HILL ,fk 0 K PARK RD 9' RFS GEARY RD G� L CREEK V Q _ WALNUT CREEK - 0 cc �E y cn -• ( LAFAYETTE a y 9 ORINDA z o a c n y 0 o tiPg� RELIEZ S T Q\ STATION 0I-Y�1 �� I ��� pa t'�LAFAYE-:-E RD F IC n O 5v .r s ✓ aL? y dtla �.4NO), -NVO -110 • l d 0o� U v: N 3�`I1AS233W0s 10 co co ! cn m O t' sS'Vd E... U. o Clo i ♦ z ^�1 A-Sall)ca 1 e a Q z Q O -a Nb�ti� OPS- d id W (1., d �! d- (i FIGURE 5 BRADFORD 61 lcb� WEBB TRACT ISLAND NOT TO SCALE is + Fatse A N IS LAN D ZZ 16 �,�P FRANKS TRACT r CD 5tate Recreation Area VFXm A X sF� r look BETH EL TRACT I j RIDGE 4 GATEWAY RD rL� 5 Dutch 0,3 PROPOSED DELETION �4 , 50+ �,•;. o HOLLAND OAKLEY CYPRE TRACT jj�,� m _z O G3 PROPOSED ADDITION n n N ll . lill tit :, ,41 ;ti• Rock Stough ~ D 43 > DELTA RD < o REE WAY KNIGHTSEN SUN SET RD D U) PALM m --"ItTRACT BETHEL ISLAND AREA OF BENEFIT Zt • co DAIrdTYAV BRENTWOOD RD O D z co r npwnnn roarT w Mt s ✓6n%S✓ �a/ (�/ c jo ot °`d `<r o p`'"jj ,ry(i�'► OYROM µOt +�.i. o Ua � �U c O QRo W 5 A N—�� � CG if eR •`' I4S � BYRON � d • sh p • o W p N :+ • RO � w 5£L''ER w 81.. 0 0 v o � � a Y a U to Q•' NARK' p1RV1E a�` d U p 7 RO ✓✓• O od iko f. O \ i A. �1� ' N J \ SpSSpspaa r O 1.. , •�� �. , a 'iNij 7 y ` Ou O •� �/' !f (L NERTY �Ppt!'♦ ° 4_a -,�'( 3„.ns ,.r �r Yo, /jjjjjj•D 3t R o SSvd C b ol b. t\j .�►, °s i J !/ o d I a P V ,;;t>. I FIGURE 7 CIVOHIIVH OldlOVd N83Hlnos Lu > w ti 3Ab 1Nblt7'v'8 w � MZAB[09?w ct� >�� tt) 0-- � 0 -- xolaa000 m �is aWIH-L is ISL >_ w_ m > sob ' cr- —� AV/A>18Vd GNOWHOIH Ci s U I.i.i r.•. zt � � W �rrr Q cc Mir.L ! U � 0 cc Lu j c) cc _� j ISLAND o CI ) I FIGO 8 OAKLEY/NORTH BRENTWOOD Ver AREA OF BENEFIT CO m 00 rn vF ---r NOT TO SCALE t- TF 4t oc u� 000 [)GE GATE U R AV pinch - 4 OAKLEY �� 7N NTIOCH _ � • ��� o Z �i PROPOSED ADDITION �, v S� RD � L ] y ,gyp CYPR RD - 0 NAL �C' 2 = D G3 KNIGHTSEN _ONE o � ® < LT R! - -. TREE WAY SUN SET RD 1 < r _ r m ,m rn , m DAINTY _ AV BRENTWOOD RD O z D -- BALFOUR < RD _ le q<< BRENTWOOD D Z 4-F C " App -I rprpK Pn e'V A � F �X1 O� 13y Off` jL�< 1J cc cxA� .�� �N s�A�E � � C/ NST �O l'�''L r N.� c W �n o O z oY w x 91O CHILPANCINGO'PARKWAY ol o F� SILO \ • GOLD CL�g ROAD \ �� = O J O•HARA A• E 10 a U Y FAIRVIEW AV Q zN EMPIRE Wc o = m W O_ z RD LL a J RC = i \ m W _ _ w DEER _ V �P LU m N z Qi o Q J v t J Q Q Q 0 is v aa� LU _ W -1 i r- MM M0,( N I.L — -Nb0 7t0 0.. Q / O W 0 oow . a O UJ¢ 0 �`y �5�-P �•— Q /c � W ZZ) h/ z O z Q m Z cc = Q o m � m '" �� r s � Z Sbd $e z s N x Oe a 4 !�• ` b�.s. � J H F- 0 LU f Q W m J LL NW- «r r µit W -.iii� � � ^r�'✓ ~ �% Q. o V C 4 s 1)b a L. -f o O O V»cry^ nl O N \ 17 eRA pts "�S O r . � B A y �- � � ffk,,� Q �' G Rodeo fJAP-AtKLry ARG Cf, 9L A Q- y SAN , A� LE �� �- ALHAMBRA <LEY ATLAS RD o RD y� VA<- c 1� F� .I�'E. �,a� H c.ob � _ Q A �i �✓ O Nk,-LTO" ° OONOA RD t4o �- �� I -TQ 4 co CD o0NAL0 AV DqM RD �T cAh3YO �SJI� 3 INNER � R1GNM0N0RY(,R �,tati KS p o.. ,o i3go ANO t e �� �,Snq �► dem' Fp010f 0 46C. TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FROM: J. MICHAEL WALFORD, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR "" DATE: July 16, 1996 SUBJECT: Set Date for Public:Hearing to Revise the Bay Point (West Pittsburg) Area of Benefit Project No. 0676- 6P4130 SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION I. Recommended Action: FIX August 6, 1996 at 9:45 AM for a public hearing to revise the Bay Point Area of Benefit and DIRECT the Public Works Director to give notice of the hearing and to file a copy of the Revised Development Program Report for the Bay Point Area of Benefit with the Clerk of the Board in accordance with Government Code Sections 65091 and 66484. Il. Financiallmpact: The revision of the Bay Point Area of Benefit will have no financial impact on the General Fund. The funds collected will be deposited in a trust fund account specific to the improvements to be funded by the Bay Point Area of Benefit. 111. Reasons for Recommendations and Background: The Bay Point Area of Benefit has experienced significant changes since the last time it was revised in December, 1991. Some of the area of benefit projects have been constructed and some of the estimated development potential has been developed. This update is necessary in order to review the remaining development potential, determine what projects are necessary to mitigate the impact of that potential development, the fair share cost of that new development, and the appropriate traffic mitigation fee schedule. IV. Consequences of Negative Action: Failure to revise the Bay Point Area of Benefit will result in the loss of revenue and the funding of future projects may be delayed. Continued on Attachment: SIGNATURE: _RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR _RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE —APPROVE —OTHER SIGNATURE(S): ACTION OF BOARD ON APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER VOyE OF SUPERVISORS UNANIMOUS(ABSENT ) AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Originator: Public Works(T/E) Contact Person: Martin Lysons,313.2295 cc: M.Shlu,Deputy PW Director I hW*aa*q*ail M•bua a d aawat a1 Community Development,G.Slusher an �n �n ae on*W on 10 =eegr 9,0 Public Works Accounting hoard a dra 81 1' County Auditor-Controller Ito of ft board of SupervlWm and HJB:ML:ds:mw g:\engsvc\bo\baypthrg.t7 a Do*