Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 08061996 - D13 TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FROM: Val Alexeeff, GMEDA Director DATE: August 6, 1996 SUBJECT: Approval of Proposed Improvements to the Permit Process SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION I. Recommended Action: A. APPROVE the following conceptual process improvements for permit streamlining as outlined in Section V. B. DIRECT staff to return with detailed action items to implement the proposed process improvements for permit streamlining. H. Financial Impact: There will be initial costs associated with staff time needed to implement the permit streamlining improvements. Many of these improvements, however, are aimed at creating a long term savings through improved process efficiencies. III. Reasons for Recommendations and Background: Permit Streamlining Workshop: On June 4, 1996, the Board held a workshop on permit streamlining. At the workshop staff reviewed the current permit process along with a conceptual layout of a streamlined process. Staff had also analyzed the zoning ordinance, in the context of streamlining the review of projects, to determine which review steps are required by State statute and which are the result of local ordinance. Continued on Attachment: X SIGNATURE: 1 L*"' OL-,f�A _RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR _RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMNIITTEE APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE(S): ACTION OF BOARD ON August 6 , 19.9 6kPPROVED AS RECOMMENDED x OTHER x On this date, the Board of Supervisors held a workshop oft Permit streamlining Phase II , and the following persons appeared to speak: John R. Grosvenor, 4 Franciscan Way, Kensington, Frank Pereira, 6040 Alhambra Valley Road, Martinez , and Guy Bjerke, P.O. Box 5160;,.: San Ramon. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that recommendations 1A. and 1B. are APPROVED with the clarification that the off-street parking review would be done on commercial , industrial , and multi-family areas , and also with the clarification that the small lot issue would be changing the review process to substitute objective standards for subjective decisions. VOTE OF SUPERVISORS x UNANIMOUS(ABSENT ) AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RMA:mwsd hereby certify g:\engsvc\bo\pcmtbo-6.t8 copy of an action taken and entered hat this Is a on and _the minutes of the Orig.Div: Public Works(E/S) Board of Supe ra on the to shown. Contact: Mitch Avalon(313-2371) ATTESTED: Cv cc: CAO PHIL BA CH OR,Clerk o the Board County counsel 'upervlsor Id County Ad inistrator GMEDA Departments m By Deouty SUBJECT: Approval of Proposed Improvements to the Permit Process DATE: August 6, 1996 Page -2- III. Reasons for Recommendations and Background: Continued At the workshop the Board requested staff to: 1) return with proposed improvements for permit streamlining; 2) check the notification list for accuracy; 3) renotify all those interested in the permit streamlining efforts and inform them that the next meeting before the Board will be on August 6, 1996, and;4)to meet with the Home Builders Association before the August 6, 1996, Board meeting. As a result, the staff has done the following: a. Reviewed, revised and expanded the mailing list. The revised mailing list is attached as Attachment 1. b. Mailed letters and an activity summary to each of the organizations and individuals on the revised list. The letter that was sent out is attached as Attachment 2. The responses to our mailing are attached as Attachment 3. C. Met with the Home Builders Association. Process Improvements: Staff has developed a conceptual outline of proposed changes to accomplish permit streamlining. The proposed improvements fall into four different categories: 1. Application Acceptance Process: To achieve,the highest quality of submittal materials and to allow as many decisions as possible at the time of application submittal. 2. Ordinance Changes: To revise the ordinance code to achieve the intended overview and project outcome without undo expense or delay. 3. Application Tracking, Cost Accounting and Billing: To improve accounting automation and project tracking. 4. Staff Reports and Conditions of Approval: To improve the format of staff reports and conditions of approval and distribute them to applicants and interested parties for review prior to the hearing. Consultant Report: At the June 4, 1996, Board Workshop, staff also included a Development Process Streamlining Report that was prepared by Pacific Mutual Consultants. The report compared the Contra Costa County process to State Regulations and to current procedures in Tracy, Livermore and Sutter County. The report methodology allows comparison of the Contra Costa County process with any other jurisdiction in California for the various types of projects that are processed, such as zoning changes, specific plans, subdivisions, use permits, variances, building permits and CEQA review. The report listed 29 recommended system modifications. These recommended modifications have been reviewed and are divided into three categories of implementation timing: 1) currently underway, 2) begin implementation in six months, and 3) long term implementation project. These categorized recommendations are attached as Attachment 4. IV. Consequences of Negative Action: There will be no follow up with the workshop on permit streamlining. SUBJECT: Approval of Proposed Improvements to the Permit Process DATE: August 6, 1996 Page -3- V. Outline of Permit Streamlining Process Improvements: Process Streamlining: The current process has evolved over time and has been altered by new State and Local requirements. Upon examination, it becomes clear that the review and compliance function is intertwined with the evaluation and participation demanded by community groups. All parties involved in the process may become confused over the conditions, review authority, procedure, and role. The new proposed process will separate the compliance function performed by staff(that which is required by state law) from the community compatibility concerns (that which is desired in a community context). Under this proposal, our efforts will be to make the compliance aspects as short and clear as possible, leaving whatever time is desired for the compatibility issues. This will allow staff to maintain a better level of accountability by removing them from being responsible for delays requested by special interest groups. In separating the compliance function from the compatibility function, processing time and costs associated with development applications can be more easily predicted. Information Technology: Staff reports, conditions of approval, application tracking, timekeeping, bond accountability and billing are all candidates for an integrated information system. The information technology currently in use includes components which are antiquated, limited in flexibility and adaptability and do not provide the interaction opportunities necessary for effective coordination of the three departments in GMEDA. Staff is working on both the functional and technical requirements of a new system which will enable every aspect of a project to be processed and monitored throughout the life of the project. Proposed improvements to the permit process: The following improvements are proposed to accomplish permit streamlining: 1. Application acceptance process: To achieve the highest quality of submittal materials and to allow as many decisions as possible when the application is accepted. • Develop matrix of standard requirements for simple, straight forward projects • Improve information access at the Application and Permit Center to enable preparation of preliminary Conditions of Approval. • Determine what information/maps are needed at the Application and Permit Center to enable preliminary Conditions of Approval to be prepared (e.g., like N. Richmond P-1 maps) • Develop design standards and guidelines to clarify code requirements(e.g., creekside development) • Install computers at the Application and Permit Center front counter • Develop threshold criteria of when certain requirements are needed (e.g., right of way, sound wall, frontage improvements, etc.) • Require photos of the site be submitted with the application • Develop a list of required information to be submitted with development permit applications. • Develop a handout to advise applicants of the time limits the County must adhere to when processing development applications. 2. Ordinance Code changes: To revise the ordinance code to achieve the intended overview and project outcome without undo expense or delay. • Small lot design-eliminate review process (current process can require six months). • Off-street parking - Modify to allow for compact car dimensions and enhanced landscape standards (may reduce process time of commercial, industrial, multiple family projects by three months). • Child care - Modify the administration of the Ordinance to see that concerns are addressed early in the review of a project. • Water conservation landscaping -No change recommended. • Transportation Demand Management-Recommend the ordinance be partly repealed due to change in State statute. SUBJECT: Approval of Proposed Improvements to the Permit Process DATE: August 6, 1996 Page -4- • Cabarets - Retention of this ordinance will not affect a large number of projects. Substantial streamlining benefits will not result from repeal of this ordinance. • Home Occupation - Modify this provision in the code to allow for administrative review only where specified criteria are met. • Commercial Radio and Television Transmitting Facilities - Modify ordinance requirements where certain characteristics are present (size, shape, height, etc.). Retain development permit requirements for other transmitting and receiving facilities to avoid negative siting effects. • Forestry-Recreation District (F-R), Water Recreation District (F-1), Light Agricul- tural District (A-1) - Rezone existing properties to districts that conform with the general plan. • General Agriculture District (A-2), Heavy Agriculture District (A-3), Limited Office District(0-1), Administrative Office District (A-0), Community Business District (C- B), Controlled Manufacturing District(C-M), Light Industrial District (L-1) -Zoning district provisions should be modified and clarified to meet need of contemporary land use. • Zoning of Airport Properties -Devise and apply appropriate airport zoning districts for both county airports, so that they can serve subregional economic development in the future. Eliminate existing unrestricted (U) zoning from the code (now applied to Buchanan Field Airport). • Planned Unit District (P-1) -Expand the use of this district. • Agricultural Zoning Districts - Modify agricultural districts to allow for more agriculturally related uses as permitted uses. • Commercial Business Zoning Districts -Modify the structure of commercial zoning districts(R-B Retail Business District, N-B Neighborhood Business District, P-N-B Planned Neighborhood Business District, C General Commercial District, and C-B Community Business District)to better reflect the range of types and complexities of involved projects. Consider combined and simplified review of development plan and land use permit application reviews for less complex projects. • Light Industrial District (L-I) - Modify the provisions of the L-I Light Industrial District to provide clarity on land use permit requirements, and to allow consideration of identification sign meeting criteria without issuance of a land use permit. • Take-out Food Establishment Ordinance-Modify ordinance to eliminate requirement for bonding for litter pick-up. 3. Application tracking, cost accounting and billing: To improve accounting automation and project tracking • Coordinate project tracking with Community Development Department, Public Works Department, and the Application and Permit Center • Prioritize work list from Community Development Department to Public Works Department(what project Community Development Department wants Public Works Department to work on) • Develop noticing to applicant before expenditures reach 100% of fees • Implement joint Community Development Department/Public Works Department database for accurate billings and timekeeping 4. Staff reports and conditions of approval: To improve the readability and clarity of staff reports and conditions of approval and to improve distribution to interested parties • Clarify and simplify standard conditions of approval • Group conditions in relation to project milestones • Identify project issues in staff report • Require applicant to indicate status of completion of each conditions of approval at each project milestone • Add sign off space and date line to each condition of approval • Identify timing and sign off for fire district requests (e.g., hydrants) • Distribute conditions of approval to interested parties prior to hearing x . 13 . � 4 SUBJECT: Approval of Proposed Improvements to the Permit Process DATE: August 6, 1996 Page -5- Schedule of review and Presentation of Permit Streamlining before the Board: 1. September 1996 Presentation: A. Discussion of work program for proposed improvements. B. Discussion of interaction with interested community groups, individuals. C. Listing of top ordinance change priorities. D. Discussion of initial intake changes. E. Explanation of the new staff report format: F. Report on progress toward integrated billing and timekeeping. G. Follow-up response to consultants report. 2. January 1997 Presentation: A. Overview of direction and progress for new Board. B. Preliminary Report on Application Tracking. C. Present the next set of proposed ordinance changes. D. Progress report on intake changes. E. Preliminary report of condition of approval and staff report automation. F. Progress report on billing and timekeeping. 3. April 1997 Presentation: A. Final recommended ordinance changes. B. Any final reports on automation changes. Attachment 1 . I3 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPLICATION AND PERMIT CENTER DATE: July 24 , 1996 TO: Eileen Doten FROM: Linda Zimmerman SUBJECT: Permit Streamlining Return Mail Fourteen ( 14 ) envelopes were returned as forwarding time expired or no such address from the mailing on July 12, 1996 . I have listed below those that new addresses were located for and re-mailed on 7-24-96 and those that I was unable to locate new address and have deleted from the list. Re-mailed on 7-24-96 : Bethel Island Beacon/Oakley Gazette Antioch Chamber of Commerce Bethel Island Chamber of Commerce Roundhill Property Owners Association Richmond League of Women Voters Citizens for a Better Environment David Levy, City Attorney, City of Pinole The Oakland Tribune Deleted from list: Filipino-American Chamber Commerce Hispanic Chamber of Commerce John P. Moore - J. Patrick Land Co. Carl Thoreson - KKIS Radio Bill Hutchinson - Pittsburg Post Dispatch Jim Burt - Viacom Cablevision - 580/680 News lz rtnmail.mem t MAILING LABELS MASTERS File Name Attorney's - Atty. lst Candidates - Candidat.lst Chamber of Commerce - COC. lst City Attorney' s - Cityatty. lst City Engineers - Cityengr. lst City Managers - Citymgrs . lst City Planners - Citypinr. lst Developers - Developr. lst Homeowners Assoc. - HOA.lst Industry - Industry. lst Local Commissions - Localcom. lst Local District - Localdis . lst Media - Media. lst Regional - Regional .lst School Districts - Schools. lst Special Interest - Specint. lst Supervisors - Sups . lst lz lablist. ATTORNEY"Sf �. 13 Mark,Annstrong Tom Bruen Gagen McCoy McMahon & Annstrong Brien and Gordon 279 Front Street 1990 N. California Blvd. Suite 608 Danville CA 94526 Walnut Creek CA 94596 David Gold Robert Henn Morrison & Foerster Heim, Etzel & Weiss POB 8130 Four Embarcadero Center, 36th Floor Walnut Creek CA 94596 San Francisco, CA 94111 Sandy Skaggs Tom Powers McCutchen, Doyle, Brown & Enersen 80 Nicholl Avenue POB V Pt. Riclunond, CA 94801 Walnut Creek CA 94596 VA:dg attys.lst (7/96) Joe Canciamilla, Supervisor-Elect, District 5 Donna Gerber, Candidate, District 3 4300 Thornhill 2125 Hadden Road Pittsburg CA 94565 Walnut Creek CA 94596 Curt Kinney, Candidate, District 3 Gayle Uilkema, Candidate, District 2 2439 Ascension Drive 670 Sky Hy Circle San Ramon CA 94583 Lafayette CA 94549 Kathy Radke, Candidate, District 2 834 Carquinez Way Martinez CA 94553 r CHAMBER iOF: CONMERCE : V- 13 Antioch Chamber of Commerce Bethel Island Chamber of Commerce 301 West 10th Street, Suite 1 6328 Bethel Island Road Antioch, CA 94509 Bethel Island, CA 94511 Brentwood Chamber of Commerce Byron Chamber of Commerce 7890 Brentwood Blvd., Box 773 POB 368 Brentwood, CA 94513 Byron, CA 94514 Clayton Business and Community Association Concord Chamber of Commerce POB 436 2151 Salvio Street, Suite A Clayton, CA 94517 Concord, CA 94520 Crockett Chamber of Commerce Danville Area Chamber of Commerce POB 191 380 Diablo Road Crockett, CA 94525 Danville, CA 94526 El Cerrito Chamber of Commerce El Sobrante Chamber of Commerce 10848 San Pablo Avenue POB 924 El Cerrito, CA 94530 El Sobrante, CA 94803 Hercules Chamber of Commerce Lafayette Chamber of Corrunerce 560 Railroad Avenue 100 Lafayette Circle Hercules, CA 94547 Lafayette, CA 94549 Martinez Chamber of Commerce Moraga Chamber of Commerce 620 Las Juntas Street 346 Rheem Blvd. Martinez, CA 94553 Moraga, CA 94556 Oakley Chamber of Commerce Orinda Chamber of Commerce POB 1340 2 Theatre Square Oakley, CA 94561 Orinda, CA 94563 Pinole Chamber of Commerce Pittsburg Chamber of Commerce POB 1 2010 Railroad Avenue Pinole, CA 94564 Pittsburg, CA 94565 Pleasant Hill Chamber of Commerce Richmond Chamber of Commerce 91 Gregory Lane 3925 Macdonald Avenue Pleasant Hill, CA 94523 Riclunond, CA 94805 Rodeo Chamber of Commerce San Pablo Chamber of Commerce 586 Parker Avenue, Box 548 POB 204 Rodeo, CA 94572 San Pablo, CA 94806 San Ramon Chamber of Commerce Walnut Creek Chamber of Commerce 2355 San Ramon Valley Blvd. 1501 North Broadway, Ste. 110 San Ramon, CA 94583 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Contra Costa Council Ag One Anabel Lane, Ste. 214 coc.lst (7/96) San Ramon, CA 94583 .;CITY;ATTORNEY S I William Galstan, City Attorney Dale Adams, City Attorney City of Antioch City of Brentwood POB 130 1738 Grant Street Antioch, CA 94509 Concord, CA 94520 Maurice Huguet, Jr., City Attorney Michael Martello, City Attorney City of Clayton City of Concord POB 110 1950 Parkside Drive Clayton, CA 94517 Concord, CA 94519 Mark Doane, City Attorney Howard Stern, City Attorney Town of Danville City of El Cerrito 510 LaGonda Way 100 Smith Ranch Rd., Ste. 306 Danville, CA 94526 San Rafael, CA 94903 Cecelia Bridges, City Attorney Charles Williams, City Attorney City of Hercules Cities of Lamorinda and Pittsburg 100 Smith Ranch Rd., Ste. 306 1320 Arnold Dr., Ste. 160 San Rafael, CA 94903 Martinez, CA 94553 Jeffrey Walter, City Attorney David Levy, City Attorney City of Martinez City of Pinole 2455 Bennett Valley Rd., Ste. 201B 2200 Pear Street Santa Rosa, CA 95404 Pinole CA 94564 David Larsen, City Attorney Malcolm Hunter, City Attorney City of Pleasant Hill City of Richmond 100 Gregory Lane POB 4046 Pleasant Hill, CA 94523 Richmond, CA 94804 Brian Libow, City Attorney Byron Athan, City Attorney City of San Pablo City of San Ramon One Alvarado Square 2222 Camino Ramon San Pablo, CA 94806 San Ramon, CA 94583 Thomas Haas, City Attorney :dg City of Walnut Creek cityatty.lst (3/96) POB 8039 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 . . CITY'EDTGINEERS .� Stan Davis,City Engineer Marc Goto, City Engineer City of Antioch City of Brentwood POB 130 708 Third Street Antioch, CA 94509 Brentwood, CA 94513 Rick Angrisani, City Engineer Alex Pascual, City Engineer City of Clayton City of Concord POB 280 1950 Parkside Drive Clayton, CA 94517 Concord, CA 94519 Steve Lake, Public Works Director Bud Toy, Interim City Engineer Town of Danville City of El Cerrito 510 LaGonda Way 10890 San Pablo Avenue Danville, CA 94526 El Cerrito, CA 94530 Larry Loder, Interim City Engineer Mark Lander, City Engineer City of Hercules City of Lafayette 111 Civic Drive POB 1968 Hercules, CA 94547 Lafayette, CA 94549 Ray Chong, City Engineer Dan Bernie, Public Works Supt. City of Martinez Town of Moraga 525 Henrietta Street POB 188 Martinez, CA 94553 Moraga, CA 94556 John Lisenko, City Engineer G. Keith Freeman, Public Works Director City of Orinda City of Pinole 26 Orinda Way 2131 Pear Street Orinda, CA 94563 Pinole, CA 94564 Nasser Shirazi, City Engineer Leary Wong, Public Works Director City of Pittsburg City of Pleasant Hill 2020 Railroad Avenue 100 Gregory Lane Pittsburg, CA 94565 Pleasant Hill, CA 94523 Kurt Hunter, City Engineer Michael Chadwick, City Engineer City of Richinond City of San Pablo Civic Center Plaza 1 Alvarado Square Riclunond, CA 94804 San Pablo, CA 94506 Joye Kurasaki, City Engineer Frank Kennedy, City Engineer City of San Ramon City of Walnut Creek 2222 Camino Ramon POB 8039 San Ramon, CA 94583 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 :dg cityengr.lst (7/96) CITYyr�1ANAGIILS David D. Rowlands, Jr., City Manager Jay M. Corey, City Manager City of Antioch City of Brentwood POB 130 708 Third Street Antioch, CA 94509 Brentwood, CA 94513 Tom Steele, City Manager Ed James, City Manager City of Clayton City of Concord POB 280 1950 Parkside Drive Clayton, CA 94517 Concord, CA 94519 Joe Calabrigo, Town Manager Gary Pokorny, City Manager Town of Danville City of El Cerrito 510 LaGonda Way 10890 San Pablo Avenue Danville, CA 94526 El Cerrito, CA 94530 Marilyn Leuck, City Manager Robert Adams, City Manager City of Hercules City of Lafayette 111 Civic Drive POB 1968 Hercules, CA 94547 Lafayette, CA 94549 Ron Peterson, Acting City Manager Ross Hubard, Town Manager City of Martinez Town of Moraga 525 Henrietta Street POB 188 Martinez, CA 94553 Moraga, CA 94556 William Lindsay, City Manager Don Bradley, City Manager City of Orinda City of Pinole 26 Orinda Way 2131 Pear Street Orinda, CA 94563 Pinole, CA 94564 Michael Woods, City Manager Joseph Tanner, City Manager City of Pittsburg City of Pleasant Hill 2020 Railroad Avenue 100 Gregory Lane Pittsburg, CA 94565 Pleasant Hill, CA 94523 Floyd Jolulson, City Manager Rory Robulson, City Manager City of Riclunond City of San Pablo Civic Center Plaza 1 Alvarado Square Richmond, CA 94804 San Pablo, CA 94506 Herb Moniz, City Manager Don Blubaugh, City Manager City of San Ramon City of Walnut Creek 2222 Camino Ramon POB 8039 San Ramon, CA 94583 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 :dg cityingrs.lst (7/96) Ray Vignola, Director of Development Services Eddie Peabody, Planning Director City of Antioch City of Brentwood P.O. Box 130 708 Third Street Antioch, CA 94509 Brentwood, CA 94513 Randy Hatch, Planning Director Bill Reeds, Community Development Director City of Clayton City of Concord P.O. Box 280 1950 Parkside Drive Clayton, CA 94517 Concord, CA 94519 Kevin Gailey, Chief of Planning Ed Phillips, City Planner Town of Danville City of El Cerrito 510 LaGonda Way 10890 San Pablo Avenue Danville, CA 94526 El Cerrito, CA 94530 J. Kevin Garrett, Planning Director Niroop Srivatsa, Planning Director City of Hercules City of Lafayette 111 Civic Drive POB 1968 Hercules, CA 94547 Lafayette, CA 94549 Richard Pearson, CD Director Jay Tashiro, Town Planner City of Martinez Town of Moraga 525 Henrietta Street P. O. Box 188 Martinez, CA 94553 Moraga, CA 94556 Irwin Kaplan, Planning Director Dave Dowsell, City Planner City of Orinda City of Pinole 26 Orinda Way 2131 Pear Street Orinda, CA 94563 Pinole, CA 94564 Ralph Petty, Conununity Development Director Nasser Shirazi, CD Director City of Pinole City of Pittsburg 2131 Pear Street 2020 Railroad Avenue Pinole, CA 94564 Pittsburg, CA 94565 Rich Bottarini, CD Director James Farah, Planning Director City of Pleasant Hill City of Richmond 100 Gregory Lane 2600 Barrett Ave. Pleasant Hill, CA 94523 Richmond, CA 94804 David Thompson, Acting Redev Admin Gordon Anderson, CD Director City of Richmond City of San Pablo 2600 Barrett Ave. One Alvarado Square Riclunond, CA 94804 San Pablo, CA 94506 Phil Wong, Planning Services Manager Isaac Seliger, CD Director City of San Ramon City of San Ramon 2222 Camino Ramon 2222 Camino Ramon San Ramon, CA 94583 San Ramon, CA 94583 Paul Richardson, Chief of Planning Kevin Roberts, CD Director City of Walnut Creek City of Walnut Creek P.O. Box 8039 P.O. Box 8039 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 :dg citypinr.lst (3/96) .DEVELOPERS . 13 Acme Engineering Agua Science Engineers 8143 Terrace Drive 2411 Old Crow Canyon Rd. #4 El Cerrito CA 94530 San Ramon CA 94583, Aliquot Associated Bldrs. & Contractors Assn. 125 Ryan Industrial Ct., Ste. 109 63377 Clark Avenue San Ramon CA 94583 Dublin CA 94568 Barton-Aschman Associates Bass Homes, Inc. 100 Park Center Plaza, Ste. 460 21730 Stevens Creek Blvd. #210 San Jose CA 95113 Cupertino CA 95014 Frank Bellecci Bedford Properties Bellecci and Associates 270 Lafayette Circle 2290 Diamond Blvd., Ste. 100 Lafayette CA 94549 Concord CA 94520 Rich Jensen Blackhawk Development Corp. Braddock and Logan POB 807 POB 5300 Danville CA 94526 Danville CA 94526 John Compaglia Brian, Kangas, Foulk Bryan & Murphy Assoc. 2737 No. Main Street, Ste. 200 5000 Executive Parkway 9125 Walnut Creek CA 94596 San Ramon CA 94583 Burns Engineering Camp, Dresser & McKee POB 761 100 Pringle Avenue, Ste. 300 Bethel Island CA 94511 Walnut Creek CA 94596 Dave Carlson Steven Garrett Carlson, Barbee, Gibson Centex Homes 2000 Crow Canyon Pl., Ste. 250 1855 Gateway Blvd., Ste. 650 San Ramon CA 94583 Concord CA 94520 Alan Chapman Central Contra Costa Builder Exchange Chapman & Wilson 115 Aspen Drive 1350 Treat Blvd., Suite 560 Pacheco CA 94553 Walnut Creek CA 94596 Nat Taylor Citation Northern Inc. Cowell Foundation 597 Center Avenue #150 120 Montgomery St., Ste. 2570 Martinez CA 94553 San Francisco CA 94104 Crabtree Engineering CSW Engineering/Stuber-Stroeh Group, Inc. 710 Shady Glen 790 DeLong Avenue Martinez CA 94553 Novato CA 94945 Cullen-Phillippi Associates, Inc. Cunha Engineering, Inc. POB 591 1690 San Pablo Avenue, Ste. C Benicia CA 94510 Pinole CA 94564 D.B. Flett & Assoc. DeBolt Civil Engineering 1655 No. Main Street #310 811 San Ramon Valley Blvd. Walnut Creek CA 94596 Danville CA 94526 Bob Duchi DK & Associates DKS Associates 1440 Maria Lane, Ste. 200 1956 Webster Street #300 Walnut Creek CA 94596 Oakland CA 94612 Duffel Financial & Const. Co. Earl Smith Development, Ltd. 1430 Willow Pass Road 51 Pacifica Avenue Concord CA 94520 Pittsburg CA 94565 Gilbert Fitch & Associates Govers Engineers 2120 Mt. Diablo St. 3708 Mt. Diablo Blvd. Ste. 100 Concord CA 94520 Lafayette CA 94549 Bob Selders Greiner Hal Porter Homes 5890 Stoneridge Drive 1210 Central Blvd. Pleasanton CA 94580 Brentwood CA 94513 Eric Hasseltine David Lennon Hasseltine Best Hoffman Company 3182 Old Tunnel Road, Suite E POB 907. Lafayette CA 94549 Concord CA 94522 Guy Bjerke Home Builders Association Humann Company, The POB 5160 1021 Brown Avenue San Ramon CA 94583 Lafayette CA, 94549 Isakson & Associates, Inc. J.E. Schuricht & Associates 2255 Ygnacio Valley Rd., Ste. C 2630 Salvio Street Walnut Creek CA 94598 Concord CA 94519 �3 JEDCO Engineers JHK & Associates 930 Dwight Way #10A 2000 Powell Street #1090 Berkeley CA 94710 Emeryville CA 94608 Kister, Savio & Rei KNB Associates 3095 Richmond Parkway #214 3259 Fernside Blvd. Riclunond CA 94806 Alameda CA 94501 Land Factors Inc. Leptien-Cronin-Cooper, Inc. 30 Town and Country Drive 3855 Alhambra Ave. Danville CA 94526 Martinez CA 94553 Lippow Developer Company Luk, Milani & Associates POB 469 1465 Enea Circle #788 Martinez CA 94553 Concord CA 94520 Mike McGill McBail Company McGill-Martin-Self 3200 Danville Blvd. 4 Orinda Way, Ste. 200A Alamo CA 94507 Orinda CA 94563 Moran Engineering Nolte & Associates 1930 Shattuck Avenue 2950 Buskirk Ave., Ste. 225 Berkeley CA 94707 Walnut Creek CA 94596 Northwood.Homes, Inc. Nystrom Engineering POB 2709 500 Ygnacio Valley Rd, Ste. 425 Livermore CA 94551 Walnut Creek CA 94596 Pulte Homes Corporation Randles Engineering Company 5976 W. Las Positas Blvd., #100 1088 23rd Street Pleasanton CA 94588 Richmond CA 94804 RMR Design Group Russell J. Bruzzone 1130 Burnett Avenue #A 899 Hope Lane Concord CA 94520 Lafayette CA 94549 Santina and Thompson Schell & Martin, Inc. 1355 Willow Way, Ste. 280 3377 Mt. Diablo Blvd. Concord CA 94520 Lafayette CA 94549 Dick Sestero John Stremel SEECON SEI 4300 Railroad Avenue 2762 Hutchinson Court Pittsburg CA 94565 Walnut Creek CA 94596 Tom Koch Shapell Industries Signature Properties POB 361169 6612 Owens Drive Milpitas CA 95035 Pleasanton CA 94588 Standard Pacific Tetrad Engineering 3825 Hopyard Road #195 5528 Pacheco Blvd. Pleasanton CA 94588 Pacheco CA 94553 Tri Smith Company Tudor Engineering Company POB 4730 1800 Harrison Street Walnut Creek CA 94596 Oakland CA 94612 United Engineering Services Warmington Homes 3137 Withers Avenue 3160 Crow Canyon Place, Ste 200 Lafayette CA 94549 San Ramon CA, 94583 Bill Gray Willdan & Associates William R. Gray & Company 3478 Buskirk Avenue, #1007 500 Ygnacio Valley Road, Suite 425 Pleasant Hill. CA 94523 Walnut Creek CA 94596 Wilsey & Ham Winton Jones 2694 Bishop Drive #210 1949 Arnold Industrial Hwy. San Ramon CA 94583 Concord CA 94520 John Wollman Wollman Associates Wooldridge Organization 1233 Alpine Road 395 Taylor Blvd. Walnut Creek CA 94596 Pleasant Hill CA 94523 VA:dg developr.lst (7/96) . .' - - .�HOMEOWNERS�,ASSOCiAT�ONSs � � . 1 J Alhambra Halls Homeowners Coalition Alhambra Valley Improvement Association 6733 Corte Segunda 22 Wanda Way Martinez, CA 94553 Martinez, CA 94553 Boulevard Terrace Homeowners Castleton Square Homeowners 1306 Boulevard Way P. O. Box 616 Walnut Creek, CA 94595 San Ramon, CA 94583 Clyde Civic Improvement Assoc., Inc. County View Homeowners 109 Wellington Ave. P. O. Box 521 Clyde, CA 94520 San Ramon, CA 94583 Crockett Improvement Association Diablo Creek East Homeowners Assoc. P. O. Box 132 P. O. Box 311 Crockett, CA 94525 Clayton, CA 94517 East Richmond Heights Improvement Club East Vine Hill Improvement Assoc. 6283 Taft Avenue 737 Central Ave. Richmond, CA 94805 Martinez, CA 94553 El Sobrante Hills Neighborhood Council Fair Oaks Homeowners Association 1564 Solitude Lane 154 Fair Oaks Dr. Richmond, CA 94803-2616 Pleasant Hill, CA 94523 Friends of Franklin Hills Green Valley Road Blind Homeowners P. O. Box 425 1890 Green Valley Road Martinez, CA 94553 Danville, CA 94526 Kensington Improvement Club Kensington Property Owners Association 234 Williamette Ave. 27 Lenox Rd. Kensington, CA 94707 Kensington, CA 94707 Linda Vista Homes Association Mt. Diablo Property Owners Association P. O. Box 4599 P. O. Box 371 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Diablo, CA 94528 Mt. View Improvement Association Rodeo Improvement Association P. O. Box 163 810 Hawthorne Drive Martinez, CA 94553 Rodeo, CA 94572 l3 Roundhill Estates North POA Roundhill Homeowners Association P. O. Box 3428 2445 Southview Dr. Danville, CA 94526 Alamo, CA' 94507 Roundhill Property Owners Assoc. Upper Ygnacio Valley Homeowners 2365 Royal Oak Dr. 851 Northate Rd. Alamo, CA 94507 Walnut Creek, CA 94598 I Walden Dist. Improvement Assoc. Walnut Creek Knolls Assoc. 148 Greenwood Cir. P. O. Box 4215 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 VA:lz HOA.lst (7/96) I - RUSES _ Do13> Harold Somerset Sandra Stevens C&H Sugar Company C&H Sugar Company 830 Loring Avenue 830 Loring Avenue Crockett, CA 94525 Crockett, CA 94525 Chris Howe Mike Hannan Chevron Chevron POB 1272 POB 1272 Riclunond, CA 94802 Richmond, CA 94802 Jack Nevin Don Langewisch Chevron Chemical Company Chevron Chemical Company 940 Hensley St. 835 Castro St. Riclunond, CA 94804 Richmond, CA 94804 Scott Anderson Mike Seidel Dow Chemical Dow Chemical POB 1398 POB 1398 Pittsburg, CA 94565 Pittsburg, CA 94565 Dick Pudas Evelyn Williams, Plant Manager Dow Chemical Dupont POB 1398 6000 Bridgehead Rd. Pittsburg, CA 94565 Antioch, CA 94509 Evelyn Williams James Craig Dupont General Chemical 6000 Bridgehead Rd. 501 Nichols Rd. Antioch, CA 94509 Pittsburg, CA 94565 Thomas McGonigle Bruce Lipisko General Chemical General Chemical POB 1712 501 Nichols Rd. Richmond, CA 94802 Pittsburg, CA 94565 Jay Ward Valerie Gray General Chemical General Chemical 501 Nichols Rd. POB 1712 Pittsburg, CA 94565 Richmond, CA 94802 Lynri Wise Ken Lopez Great Western Chemical Company Imperial West Chemical 860 Wharf St. POB 606 Riclunond, CA 94804 Antioch, CA 94509 Andrew Woods Mark Chiniquy Imperial West Chemical Industrial Compliance POB 606 3395 Joshua Woods Place Antioch, CA 94509 Concord, CA 94518 ` • l3 : Tom Stewart John Melnyk Infonn Public Relations IT Corporation 816 Main St. 4585 Pacheco Blvd. Martinez, CA 94553 Martinez, CA 94553 Hermann Welm Mario DiGiovauii Marwais Steel Company Monsanto Company 655 Montgomery, Ste. 600 1778 Monsanto Way San Francisco, CA 94111 Martinez, CA 94553 Ralph Edwards William Habaya Pacific Refining Company Parsons Brinckerhoff 4901 San Pablo Ave. 303 Second St., Ste. 700 North Hercules, CA 94547 San Francisco, CA 94107 Ralph. Hodge Tom Webb Parsons Brinckerhoff PGandE-Pittsburg Power Plant 303 Second St., Ste. 700 North POB 590 San Francisco, CA 94107 Pittsburg, CA 94565 Clayton Bowers Bary Wills PGandE-Pittsburg Power Plant PGandE-Pittsburg Power Plant POB 590 POB 590 Pittsburg, CA 94565 Pittsburg,i CA 94565 Pete Juriclilco Tomi Vaiiderbrooke Rhone-Poulenc Shell Oil i 100 Mococo Road POB 711 Martinez, CA 94453 Martinez, CA 94553 Pat Chadwick Mar Leeds Shell Oil - Shell Oil POB 711 POB 711 Martinez, CA 94553 Martinez, CA. 94553 Paula Amanda George Farosich Southern Pacific Lines Souther Pacific Lines 1 Market Plaza, Rm. 834 1 Market Plaza, Rm. 801 San Francisco, CA 94105 San Francisco, CA 94105 Jim Simmons Steve Plesh Tosco Unocal ' 2300 Clayton Road, Ste. 1100 1380 Sail Pablo Ave. Concord, CA 94520 Rodeo, CA 94572 John Vialpando Rand Swensen Unocal Unocal 2101 Franklin Canyon Rd. 1380 San Pablo Ave. Rodeo, CA 94572 Rodeo,;CA 94572 Kelly McMahon Keith Samson 1 J USS/Posco Industries USS/Posco Industries POB 471 (MS 65) POB 471 (MS 63) Pittsburg, CA 94509 Pittsburg, CA 94565 John Riley Donald Seitas Zeneca Inc. - Ag Products Zeneca Inc. - Ag Products 1415 South 47th St. 1200 South 47th St. RicIunond, CA 94804 Richmond, CA 94804 James Bates :dg Zeneca Inc. - Ag Products Mustry.lst (1/95) 1200 South 47th St. Richmond, CA 94804 LQC1L,,COMMISSIONS John Henderson Bay Point MAC Alamo Improvement Association 3105 Willow Pass Rd. P. O. Box 271 Pittsburg, CA 94565 Alamo, CA 94507 Bethel Island Area Association Bethel Island MAC P. O. Box 4 P. O. Box 1388 Bethel Island, CA 94511 Bethel Island, CA 94511 Bethel Island Muni. Improve. Dist. Ms. Mary Schultz P. O. Box 244 Byron Advisory Council Bethel Island, CA 94511 P. O. Box 268 Byron, CA 94514 John T. New, President Clyde Citizen's Advisory Commission CELSEB 140 Norman Ave. 2840 Minert Rd. Clyde, CA 94520 Concord, CA 94518 Clyde Civic Improvement Assoc., Inc. Crockett Improvement Association 109 Wellington Ave. P. O. Box 132 Clyde, CA 94520 Crockett, CA 94525 Diablo Property Owners Association Discovery Bay MAC P. O. Box 785. P. O. Box 272 Diablo, CA 94528 Byron, CA 94514 Bob Sullivan, Chair El Sobrante Valley Planning and El Sobrante MAC Zoning Committee 3817 San Pablo Dam Rd., #533 P. 0. Box 20136 El Sobrante, CA 94803 El Sobrante, CA 95820-0136 Richard Muller Knightsen TAC Kensington MAC P. 0. Box 170 51 Kenyon Ave. Knightsen, CA 94598 Kensington, CA 94707 North Richmond MAC Oakley MAC 4505 Macdonald Ave. P. 0. Box 212 Richmond, CA 94805 Oakley, CA 94561 Hank Bren nes Pacheco Town Council Pacheco MAC 45 Rutherford Lane 269 Area Dr. Pacheco, CA 94553 Pacheco, CA 94553 Port Costa Town Council Rodeo MAC P. O. Box 60 c/o Supv. Jeff Smith's Office Port Costa, CA 94569 INTEROFFICE MAIL Rodeo Redevelopment Advisory Comm. c/o Jim Kennedy Community Development VA:lz INTEROFFICE MAIL localcom.lst (7/96) x ,LOCAL DISTRICTS_ �. Ambrose Recreation and Park District VA:lz 3105 Willow Pass Rd. localdis.lst (7/96) Bay Point, CA 94565 Wendell Brunner California Cities Water CCC Environmental Health 3145 Willow Pass Rd. 1111 Ward St. Pittsburg, CA 94565 Martinez, CA 94553 Chief Allen Little Tom Brumleve CCC Fire Protection District CCC Resource Conservation District 2010 Geary Rd. 5552 Clayton Rd. Pleasant Hill, CA 94523 Concord, CA 94521 Roger Dolan Jeffrey Straus, Chair Central CCC Sanitary District Contra Costa Planning Commission 5019 Imhoff Place 145 Cafeto Ct. Martinez, CA 94553 Walnut Creek, CA 94598 Contra Costa Water District Crockett-Valona Sanitary District P. O. Box H2O P. O. Box 578 Concord, CA 94524 Crockett, CA 94525 Diablo Community Services District Diablo Water District P. O. Box 321 P. O. Box 127 Diablo, CA 94528 Oakley, CA 94561 Community Affairs Office Dublin-Sari Ramon Services District East Bay Municipal Utility District 7051 Dublin Blvd. 375 - 1 nth St., Mail Slot 802 Dublin, CA 94566 Oakland, CA 94607-4240 Janess R. Hanson, Chair East County Regional Planning Comm. Ironhouse Sanitary District 431 Levee Rd. P. O. Box 1105 Baypoint, CA 94565 Oakley, CA 94561-5793 Kensington Community Service District Mt. View Sanitary District 217 Arlington Ave. P. O. Box 2757 Kensington, CA 94707 Martinez, CA 94553 Neal Matsunaga, Chair Rodeo Sanitary District San Ramon Valley Reg. Plarming Comm. P. O. Box 97 2429 Camino De Jugar Rodeo, CA 94572 San Ramon, CA 94583 Y Antioch Daily Ledger Bernadette Tansey Pittsburg Post Dispatch Bay City News Service P. O. Box 2299 625 Court St., Rm. 411 Antioch, CA 94531-2299 Martinez, CA 94553 Bethel Island Beacon Dave Roberts Oakley Gazette Brentwood News POB 580 P. O. Box 517 Bethel Island, CA 94511 Brentwood, CA 94513 Contra Costa Insider Contra Costa Times P. O. Box 5726 Martinez Bureau Walnut Creek, CA 94596 831 Main St. Martinez, CA 94553 Contra Costa Times Contra Costa Sun POB 4718 POB 599 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Lafayette, CA 94549 Christine Cutshaw Ed Delbeccaro, Editor County Supervisors Association of CA Contra Costa Council Business Voice 1100 K St., Ste. 101 2694 Bishop Dr., Ste. 121 Sacramento, CA 95814 San Ramon, CA 94583 Diablo Valley College Enquirer Grant Opperman, Executive Director 321 Golf Club Rd. Diablo Magazine Pleasant Hill, CA 94523 2520 Caramo Diablo, Ste. 200 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Sally St. Lawrence, Editor Maggie Malone El Cemto-Journal East Bay Monitor 2936 Domingo St. 16 Cherokee Ct. Berkeley, CA 94705 San Ramon, CA 94583-4302 Dave Padilla Tom Duhain KCB S Radio KCRA-T V 625 Court St., Rin. 411 3 Television Cir. Martinez, CA 94553 Sacramento, CA 95814 Mike Wesley Jolm Kessler KGO-T V KRON-T V 2300 Contra Costa Blvd., Ste. 105 1001 Van Ness Ave. Pleasant Hill,CA 94523 San Francisco, CA 94109 Jay Martinez Kensington Outlook KTVU-TV 166 Ardmore Rd. P. O. Box 2222 Kensington, CA 94707 Oakland, CA 94623 Robert Osmond, Managing Editor Metro Reporter Martinez New Gazette 1366 Turk St. 615 Estudillo St. San Francisco, CA 94115 Martinez, CA 94553 The Oakland Tribune San Francisco Examiner 66 Jack London Square 725 Court St., Rm. 411 Oakland, CA 94607 Martinez, CA 94553 Marty Halstuk/En"n Hallissy Rollie McLaughlin San Francisco Chronicle San Francisco Business Times 725 Court St., Rin 411 275 Battery St., #940 Martinez, CA 94553 San Francisco, CA 94111 San Ramon Valley Times Tri-Valley Herald Attn: Judy, Legals POB 10367 POB 68 Pleasanton, CA 94588 Danville, CA 94526 Valley Times West County Times POB 607 POB 100 Pleasanton, CA 94566 Pinole, CA 94564 VA-lz - Media.lst (7/96) ABAG AC Transit POB 2050 1600 Franklin St. Oakland, CA 94604 Oakland, CA 94612 Alameda County Planning Alameda County Congestion Mgmt Agency 399 Elmhurst, Rin. 136 1333 Broadway, Suite 220 Hayward, CA 94544 Oakland, CA 94612 Bay Area Air Quality Management District Bay Area Council 939 Ellis Street 200 Pine St., Suite 300 San Francisco, CA 94109 San Francisco, CA 94111 Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Martin Engleman 5019 Imhoff Place Contra Costa Transportation Authority Martinez, CA 94553 1340 Treat Blvd., Suite 150 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Contra Costa Council Martin Vitz 2694 Bishop Drive, Ste. 121 East Bay Regional Park District San Ramon, CA 94583 POB 5381 Oakland CA 9405 Livermore School District John McCullum 685 Las Positas Blvd. Metropolitan Transportation Commission Livermore, CA 94550 101 Eighth St., 3rd Flr. Oakland CA 94607 San Francisco Bay Conversation and San Joaquin County Development Commission Planning Department 30 Van Ness Avenue 1810 East Hazelton Avenue San Francisco CA 94102 Stockton CA 95205 Solano County SWAT c/o Brian Welch Dept. of Enviromnental Management Town of Danville 601 Texas Street 510 La Gonda Way Fairfield CA 94533 Danville CA 94526 TRANSPAC c/o Barbara Neustadter TRANSPLAN c/o Patrick Roche 296 Jayne Avenue CCC Community Development Oakland CA 94610 INTEROFFICE MAIL TVTC c/o Bill van Gelder WCCTAC c/o Paul Korry 200 Old Bernal Avenue 1 Alvarado Square Pleasanton CA 94566 San Pablo CA 94806 ' ;.:SPECIAT;��TNT�:RFSTS� 10 John Fittewrtt Chapman 671 Clipper Hill Road Ambrose Recreation and Park District Danville CA 94526 3105 Willow Pass Road Bay Point CA 94565 Mt. Diablo Chapter Archaeological Conservancy Audubon Society 1217 23rd Street POB 53 Sacramento CA 95716 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Contra Costa County (central) West Contra Costa County Board of Realtors Board of Realtors POB 5207 423 46th Street Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Richmond CA 94805 Delta Board of Realtors California Native Plant Society 3721 Sunset Lane, Ste. A POB 5597 Elmwood Station Antioch, CA 94509 Berkeley, CA 94704 Contra Costa-Alameda Counties Cattlemen's Association Central Labor Council of CCC 5554 Clayton Rd. POB 389 Concord CA 94521 Martinez CA 94553 Citizens for a Better Enviromnent Citizens Land Alliance 500 Howard Street, Suite 506 105 E. 10th St. San Francisco, CA 94105 Tracy, CA 95376 Citizens to.Preserve the Delta Coalition of Labor and Business POB 821 1030 Shary Court, Rm 202 Brentwood, CA 94513 Concord CA 94518 Contra Costa Historical Society Contra Costa Taxpayers' Assn. 1700 Oak Park Blvd, Rm C5 POB 27 Pleasant Hill CA 94523 Martinez, CA 94553 Greg Feere West CCC Contra Costa Bldg & Const Trades Council Council of Industries 935 Alhambra Avenue POB 5189 Martinez CA 94553 Hercules, CA 94549 County Service Area M-16 County Service Area M-17 150 Nonnan Avenue 2345 Del Monte Drive Clyde CA 94520 San Pablo CA 98406 County Service Area R-8 County Service Area R-7A 1445 Civic Drive POB 1062 Walnut Creek CA 94596 Alamo CA 94507 County Service Area R-713 County Service Area M-8, Byron POB 474 4700 Discovery Point Danville CA 94526 Byron CA 94514 Martin Vitz, Adv. Planning Mgr. Delta Diablo Sanitation District EBRPD 2500 Pittsburg/Antioch Hwy POB 5381 Antioch, CA 94509 Oakland, CA 94605 Tom Graff Environmental Defense Fund Greenbelt Alliance 5655 College Avenue, Ste. 304 500 Ygnacio Valley Rd, Ste 250 Oakland CA 94618 Walnut Creek CA 94596 Kathy Adams Home Base Industrial Association of CCC 870 Market Street, Ste. 1228 POB 988 San Francisco CA 94102 Martinez CA 94553 Riclunond Diablo Valley League of Women Voters League of Women Voters 1245 Navellier St. 500 St. Mary's Road El Cerrito, CA 94530 Lafayette CA 94549 Margaret Tracy - Preserve Area Ridgelands Com Save Mt. Diablo 1262 Madison Ave POB 5376 Livermore, CA 94550 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Jim Blickenstaff William Siri Save Our Hills Save San Francisco Bay Association 2410 Tolevera Drive 1736 Franklin Street, 3rd Flr. San Ramon CA 94583 Oakland CA 94612 Sierra Club (SF Bay Chapter) Sierra Club (Diablo) 5237 College Avenue 21 Anderson Circle Oakland, CA. 94618 Walnut Creek, CA 94595 :dg Urban Creeks Council specint.lst (7/96) 1250 Addison St., Ste. 107 Berkeley, CA 94702 x SSolibb DISTRICTS d Alan Newell Douglas Adams Antioch Unified School District Brentwood Union School District POB 768 250 First Street Antioch, CA 94509 Brentwood, CA 94513 Margaret Green Hope Nathan Byron Union School District Canyon School District Rt. #1, Box 48 POB 187 Byron, CA 94514 Canyon, CA 94516 John Frank Vickey Rinehart John Swett Unified School District Knightsen School District 341 B Street POB 265 Crockett, CA 94524 Knightsen, CA 94548 James Martin, Ed.D Scott Brown Lafayette School District Martinez Unified School District POB 1029 921 Susana Street Lafayette, CA 94549 Martinez, CA 94553 John Cooley, Ph. D Robert Basun Moraga School District Mt. Diablo Unified School District POB 158 1936 Carlotta Drive Moraga, CA 94556 Concord, CA 94519 Frank Hengel Richard Winefield Oakley. Union Elementary School District Orinda Union School District POB 7 8 Altarinda Road Oakley, CA 94561 Orinda, CA 94563 Robert Newell Herbert M. Cole, Jr. Pittsburg Unified School District West Contra Costa Unified School District 2000 Railroad Avenue 1108 Bissell Avenue Pittsburg, CA 94565 Richmond, CA 94802 Biefke Vos Michael De Sa San Ramon Valley Unified School District Walnut Creek School District 699 Old Orchard Drive 960 Ygnacio Valley Road Danville, CA 94526 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 James J. Perino Dan Smith Acalanes Uiuon High School District Liberty Union High School District 1212 Pleasant Hill Road 850 Second Street Lafayette, CA 94549 Brentwood, CA 94513 Robert Jensen, Chancellor Dr. Ronald L. Stewart CCC Community College District Contra Costa County Superintendent of Schools 500 Court Street 75 Santa Barbara Road Martinez, CA 94553 Pleasant Hill, CA 94523 SUPERVISORS ;` Supervisor Jim Rogers, District 1 Supervisor Jeff Smith, District 2 �J c/o Clerk of the Board 651 Pine Street, Room 108A 651 Pine Street, Room 106 Martinez CA 94553 Martinez CA 94553 Supervisor Gayle Bishop, District 3 Supervisor Mark DeSaulnier, District 4 18 Crow Canyon Road, Ste. 120 2425 Bisso Lane, Ste 110 San Ramon CA 94583 Concord CA 94520 Supervisor Tom Torlakson, District 5 300 E. Leland Ave, Ste 100 Pittsburg CA 94546 Attachment 2 GroWVt v Management and Contra Economic Development Agency Costa Valentin Alexeeff, Director County July 10 1996 r` n; T� COU y The Growth Management and Economic Development Agency is continuing its effort toward permit streamlining. We contracted with an independent consultant to study our process 1 3 j T — - _ 1 1 I JF+ 1. 3t — I — F — 3 i k i I (i7 '1 I 1 I i - i :3 i "1 I 1 I I _ _ I f i 1 _ i — 9 I I — � l 1 i i 1 I - i I =_ I I j i i E 1 = a 1 I _ I I €I j I �3 ■ I 3 � I I b I 3 I — 3 I a l I S ■ I ; � I — I P j • I � _ 1 — r a — I j! i I. 3 a I i i i i Attachment 2 , 1 1 GroWt e Management and Contra Economic Development Agency Costa Valentin Alexeeff, Director County S� L July 10, 1996 S�`; COUT1'C� The Growth Management and Economic Development Agency is continuing its effort toward permit streamlining. We contracted with an independent consultant to study our process and to compare it to other jurisdictions and to State requirements . Concurrently, staff fully reviewed our process . We combined our findings and the recommendations of the consultant and have targeted areas for change. We expect to report on our progress to the Board of Supervisors on August 6 , 1996 . We will be asking for their support to make the changes which are necessary to increase efficiency and decrease processing time. Enclosed is a summary of our findings and recommendations . Please read it carefully. Your comments will be most helpful to u.s . Please fax or mail any input you have to me prior to July 26 , 1996 . Thank you for any time you are able to spend on this . If you would like the opportunity to meet with staff to participate in implementing process changes, please let me know. I can be reached at 510-646-1600 . Very Truly Yours, Eileen Doten Customer Services Manager ED: lz Enclosures Permitstrm. ltr 651 Pine Street, No. Wing, Second Floor, Martinez, California 94553-1213 Telephone: (510) 646-1620 • FAX: (510) 646-1599 13 Contra Costa County Permit Streamlining Project: July 1996 Summary of Consultants Report (Development Process Streamlining Report, Pacific Mutual Consultants, May 1996) The Agency contracted with a planning consultant in March 1996 to investigate our internal process . Our ultimate goal was to identify way to produce a more efficient method for processing development permits. Our consultant wrote a report which compares the Contra Costa County process to State regulations and to procedures in Tracy, Livermore and in Sutter County. The methodology allows comparison to Contra Costa County process with any other jurisdiction in California for zone change, specific plan, subdivision, use permit, variance, building permit, and CEQA review. The report lists twenty-nine recommended system modifications . These recommendations include: reduce length and complexity of staff reports, computerize project logs, provide sample conditions of approval, use a development review process in place of the preapplication review process, minimize physical separation among departments, adapt regulations clarifying the roles of advisory committees, fast track high priority items, and establish a computer linkage between the Permit Center and on-site inspectors . The report identifies privatization options and steps to incorporate privatization. It describes the primary benefit as speedy, economically focused work, however it is limited by reduced public accessibility and accountability. The report includes sample documents from other jurisdictions such as process schedules and standard conditions of approval. Process Streamlining The current development process has evolved overtime with periodic alterations by new State and local requirements . Upon examination, it becomes clear that the review and compliance functions performed by staff have become intertwined with the evaluation and participation demanded by community groups . As a result, all parties become confused over conditions, review authority, procedure and role. A new approval process will be proposed which will separate the "compliance" function performed by staff from the community "compatibility" concerns . Working within this concept, our efforts eDAz permWream.sum 7/10196 will be to make the compliance aspects as defined, short and clear as possible; setting whatever time is desired for compatibility issues . This will allow us to maintain a higher level of accountability for staff time associated with a project. It will remove staff from responsibility for delays caused by special interests . In separating compliance functions from compatibility functions the processing and costs associated with development applications will be more easily predicted and allocated. It is our intention, in the near future, to directly bill the applicant for all work associated with the project. This will allow staff time and other costs associated with the application to be more easily tracked. A distinction will be made between the legal requirements of processing and that work related to community compatibility. Information Technology The information technology currently in use includes components which are antiquated, limited in flexibility and adaptability, and do not provide the interaction opportunities necessary for effective coordination of three departments . The core data storage and retrevial component for the Growth Management and Economic Development Agency is a centralized base of information and processing which assists GMEDA personnel in managing the land development process in Building Inspection, Community Development and Public Works . The system is also used by the Assessor, Tax Collector, Environmental Health, Recorder and related offices . Staff reports, conditions of approval, application tracking, time keeping, bond accountability and billing are all candidates for an integrated information system. Staff is working on both functional and technical requirements of the new system to enable every aspect of a project to be processed and monitored through the system. For example, use of bonds and other means to ensure development compliance becomes an important topic every time it is discovered that a developer cut corners on required improvements, or that bonds haven't been released when they should have been. Bonds and/or agreements are used by Public Works, Building Inspection, Community Development, and Health Services . Activities, timing and release circumstances can be tracked to ensure accuracy in activities associated with bonding. Eon: permitstream.sum 7/10196 P• . Ordinance Options Reduction of processing time is most greatly affected by whether a project is determined to be ministerial or discretionary. For a ministerial approval, once conditions are reviewed and met, the permit is granted administratively. A discretionary permit requires judgement in addition to satisfying conditions . It also may trigger CEQA evaluation (though many discretionary permits are exempt) . Discretionary review procedures have expanded in time and complexity due to formation of municipal advisory councils and other forms of community input. The following items are recommend- ed for streamlining review and possible reduction in procedural steps . Small Lot Review - current process can require six months . Off-Street Parking - current process can require four months . Child Care Facilities - current process can require several months . Water Conservation - current process requires two to three weeks . TDM - suggest repeal due to change in State statute. Cabarets - current processing requires four to six months . Home Occupation - current processing requires four to six months . Commercial Radio and Television Transmitting Facilities - current processing may take six months . Development Plans - current procedures can take six months . Districts (F-R) Forestry Recreation, (F-1) Water Recreation, (A-1) Light Agricultural - should be eliminated and rezoned to more standard districts . Districts (A-2 ) General Agriculture, (A-3) Heavy Agriculture, (0-1) Limited Office District, (A-O) Administrative Office District, (C- B) Community Business District, (C-M) Controlled Manufacturing District, (L-1) Light Industrial District - provisions should be modified and clarified to meet need of contemporary land use. P-1 District - expand use. ED/1z permRstream.sum 7/10/96 " ZENECA. Ag Products 510-231-1368 15-07-1996 10:42 P001 ZENECA AG PRODUCTS Attachment 3 lestern Research Center YACSSM=LE r�S�n�i'' ZENECA Ag Products 1200 S. 47th Street, Box 4023 Richmond, CA 94804-0023 Reply Number: DATE: 15-JUL-1996 10:41: 14.25 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FROM: Jim Bates TO Eileen Doten NUMBER: 6461599 SUBJECT: Comments of GMEDA's Recommendations NO. of PAGES: 1 excluding cover page d. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ZENECA Ag Products 510-231-1368 15-07-1996 10:42 P002 Eileen, I have read the summary of your findings and recommendations. I fully support your study and your suggestions. At present, Zeneca is not in a need for use of permitting; however, when the time comes these modifications will he helpful. Jim Bates. d. Kensington Improvement Club KENSINGTON, CALIFORNIA July 17 , 1996 Ms . ftleeu Doten, Customer Service Manager GMEDA 651 Pine Street Martinez , CA 94553 Dear Ms . Doten.: Thank you for your letter of July 10 requesting our comments on the proposed changes in the permit process . While we applaud efforts to achieve economies in time and money, we want to make sure that the interests of the communities are protected, not just those of developers . Those interests are safeguarded and defended by the 11 MACs in the County, as well as by other groups such as ours . There are two points which we wish to stress here : The Small Lot Ordinance , # 95-51 , is of great importance in a small community where the great majority of lots are sub- standard in size . Obviously under these circumstances remodel- ing plans affect neighbors far more than in most areas of the County. It is vital that citizens be given an opportunity to voice their concerns to the Kensington MAC . The local commu- nity needs to be part of the process . We would also urge you not to weaken off-street parking re- quirements . Our streets are as substandard as our lots , and requirements for off-street parking are essential . The Pacific Mutual Consultants ' report proposes many fundamental and far-reaching changes . We hope that your Department and the Board of Supervisors will study these proposals with care and not adopt them in haste . Sincerely your _4:_�l Marianne Loring President 274 Willamette Avenue Kensington , CA 94708 cc : Supervisor Rogers KENSINGTON MUNICIPAL ADVISORY COUNCIL Richard S. Muller 51 Kenyon Avenue Kensington, CA 94708-1024 TEL: 510 525 5851 (h) - 510 642 0614 (w); FAX: 510 643 6637 July 17, 1996 Ms. Eileen Doten Customer Services Manager Contra Costa County Growth Management and Economic Development Agency 651 Pine Street 2nd Floor, North Wing Martinez, CA 94553-1213 Response to your letter dated 10 July 1996 Dear Ms. Doten: This letter responds to your request for comments by the Kensington MAC on the plans of your department "toward permit streamlining." Because you ask for the response prior to 26 July, it is not possible to have public discussion at our regular meeting (which is scheduled for the final Tuesday of each month,thus 30 July this month). Also, the information that you have provided with your request letter does not spell out the specific recommendations, but rather (in the document labeled "Contra Costa County Permit Streamlining Project: July 1996")provides a fragmented overview that omits specific actions. Speaking to this overview is not of much value because of its vagary. From other sources I have received copies of two documents that do indeed provide informa- tion about what your office is proposing to the Supervisors. These documents are: (1) the Pacific Municipal Consultants' report(herein referred to as PMCR) and (2) an unattri- buted, unsigned, and undated document labeled "Zdning and Development Streamlining Issues(I'll refer to it as ZADSI)." If one takes the view that your offices have public service as their basic purpose, then it is very hard to see why the documents in question or at least the specific recom- mendations in them were not mailed to the MACS for their review. Reading through both the PMCR and ZADSI,it is, indeed, hard to discern any concern for public interest; the entire focus is on speedily providing permits to developers. By the same token, your demand for opinions to be returned within specified brief times provides for little or no public consideration or discussion. The following responds to the specifics in PMCR and ZADSI reports described above. (1) The consultant's report PMCR (page 32) recommends that MACs be given infor- mation to clarify their "precise duties and powers." We at KMAC agree whole- heartedly, and take this opportunity to add that the MACs also be given written -1- �. 13 documentation that clarifies the "precise duties and obligations of the County Planning Department with respect to the MACs" Over its six years in operation, the members serving on KMAC have undergone very considerable frustration in attempting to have an orderly interchange with the planning department. On page 33, PMCR recommends that MACS act "within 30 days following the application submittal." This time line is unreasonable-- volunteer citizen groups should not be forced to convene meetings at more than a monthly schedule. Allowing for time to prepare and to post Brown-act-mandated agendas, it is clear that the maximum time delay should be 45, and not 30 days. We consider it very reasonable to impose a maximum delay of 45 days on a project in order to pro- vide a review of its impact. This means that the County must have its act together in order to send the information in time to notify near neighbors of any proposed project. We do NOT agree with the PMRC(also page 33) that MACs should limit their recommendations to aspects of the established regulations. In fact, the MACs represent the best opportunity for community input on the broad scale. Because the citizens in a community live with the results of a project for the rest of their days,it is certainly reasonable to allow for them to provide input that may not be embodied into some statute or regulation, but that may have relevance to a pro- ject. (2) The ZADSI report flat out recommends (page 3) that the small lot review be eliminated. KMAC very strongly opposes this recommendation. Of course, eliminating the small lot review would "streamline the permit process"just as kil- ling the baby would save the milk money. On KMAC, we have had several instances in which small lot reviews have produced important changes in the pro- jects. We are confident that older communities like Kensington with many non- conforming small lots are given needed protection by the small lot review. The small lot review was established precisely because the dense placement of houses in places like Kensington can produce effects that do not find exact coverage in statutes. These effects can, and should be voiced and considered in order to improve the community. Newer areas, generally, do not have small lots and would not be affected by this change. We strongly urge that the supervisors reject this ill-considered recommendation. (3) Off-street parking is recommended for modification in the ZADSI report (page 4). We are skeptical about the arguments about the prevalence of"smaller vehi- cles" at this time as contrasted with the 1960s-- especially considering the growth in popularity of off-road vehicles and trucks. Kensington has a strong need for the provision of adequate off-street parking and feels that any changes in the law should be taken only after very thorough review. We in KMAC object to the haste with which we are being asked to respond to these changes. As presented, they appear to be responsive only to the concerns of developers, and not at all mindful of the effects of projects on the larger public. We also object to being given only a vague description of what is really being proposed. Other MACs and -2- agencies, who may respond only to the sheet accompanying your letter, will certainly not be able to make substantive judgements. Although these proposals profess to deal only with "streamlining," they have direct effect on the entire development process. They strongly affect the public and should therefore be fully discussed. We ask that the proposed changes be held back for review for at least one month so that the affected groups can discuss them at open meetings. There is really no compelling need for considering action on these proposals at the 6 August meeting of the Board of Supervisors. Sincerely, Ic 9-C i�d Richard S. Muller Chairman: KMAC cc Supervisor Jim Rogers, Mr. Valentin Alexeeff a. -3- 07/22/96 10:15 FAX 5106340781 ZIMMERMAN LAW lih 002 Byron Municipal Advisory Council Post Office Boat 268 Byron, California 94514 Board of Directors FMI nay-Chairman Flizebe>h Van smdwylc,swrdm Stephan Herrick Fax#(510)634-8781 Nick Papadakoa Diane Bcadfard Ywhy iirrg�on• Talephow;6510)4 4-0917 •Tekglw=Contact Nmaa July 19, 1996 Eileen Doten Customer Services Manager Growth Management and Economic Development Agency 651 Pine Street No. Wing, Second Floor Martinez, CA 94553-1213 Re: Permit Streamlining Dear Ms. Doten: We are in receipt of your letter and report regarding the above referenced project. While we are in support of the general idea of sft=lining, we are greatly concerned about several aspects referenced in your report. This was discussed at our meeting last night, July 18, 1996 and the following are our comments: 1) What is the basis of comparing our county to the procedures in Tracy, Livermore and in Sutter County? 2) We note that one of the streamline modifications is clarifying the rotes of advisory committees. It is our belief that we should continue to be involved in permit process. The Byron MAC is made up of individuals who are very familiar with the area. We are vehemently opposed to any change that would reduce our input. 3) We are concerned about "reduced public accessibility and accountability". 4) What will be included in "directly bill the applicant for all work associated with the Project". . 07/22/96 10:15 FAX 5106340781 ZIh1MERMAN LAYS X1003 p 13 $ycMMunicipal Mvivxy Cauncd I Page;2 5) F-R, F-1, and A-1 elimination and rezoning. it is our understanding that the Byron Hot Springs property falls into this zoning. What impact will it have on this property? We are very concerned about the above referenced issues which are not adequately addressed in the findings and recommendations. We believe that the MAC's input in permits should not be reduced in any way, shape, or form. We welcome any clarifications regarding the above, and ask that you include us in your invitawn to meet with staff and participate in implementing process changes. We can be reached at the above numbers_ 'Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this issue. sincerely, Pi L Philip Day Chairman CC: 51e Y � Central Contra Costa Sanitary District 5019 lmhoffflace`Martinez,CA 94553 r ��.Quaurr INHo-IV4, �� FAX:(510)2284624 ROGER J.DOLAN General Manager Chief Engineer FAX: 510-646-1599 Counsel NTeDis ct (SIO)938-1430 July 25, 1996 JOYCE E.MURPHY Secretary of the District Ms. Eileen Doten Growth Management and Economic Development Agency Contra Costa County 651 Pine Street, North Wing Martinez, CA 94553-1213 Dear Ms. Doten: PERMIT STREAMLINING Thank you very much for your letter requesting input on the work you are doing to streamline your internal processing of development permits. Roger Dolan has asked me to respond to your letter. I am encouraged by you providing an opportunity for comments, and I have one thought to share with you on the subject of streamlining the development process by separating the "compliance" function from community compatibility concerns. The new approval process that will deal with "compliance" aspects will decrease the amount of time it takes for the County to process a development. The separation of the "compliance" function from "compatibility" concerns is a good concept. The implementation of the separation may be difficult. Developers and citizens have come to rely on the County, CCCSD, and other public agencies as vehicles to achieve the goals or objectives of the citizens. Removal of that vehicle grill be resisted, especially.':f there is no convenient alternative. If the customers (citizens) expect a particular service from the County and are getting that service, the customers will want that service to continue. Also, I have a request regarding the changes you are considering to the areas you have designated as "Information Technology" and "Ordinance Options." I ask that you consider providing a means for CCCSD access to your integrated information system. I believe the public could benefit from the creation of a computerized interface between our two agencies. Some of the specific activities that come to mind are: • Commenting on development applications • Updating of databases • Signing off on building permits H:\JAY\DOTEN.LTR Growth Management and Economic Development Agency Page 2 July 25, 1996 • Changing assessor's maps • Accessing County data • Incorporating conditions of approval • Tracking of applications The interface will have to be convenient and justified on the basis of receiving benefits at least equal to the costs of the interfacing and providing the service In the area of ordinance options, there may be some way to reduce processing of development plans by creating an interface mentioned above. I would like to discuss this issue further as you progress through the implementation of your consultant's recommendations. appreciate the opportunity to provide input to your proposed improvements to the County's development process at a point early in your work, and I look forward to future opportunities to review and comment on specific changes, especially related to those activities that might be considered appropriate for integration between the County and CCCSD. Sincerely, vJa . S. McCo Y Y Infrastructure Division Manager JSM:pk cc: R. Baker D. C.-aig R. Dolan H:\JAY\DOTEN.LTR CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY COMMISSIONERS: Don.Tatzin Ms. Eileen Doten July 24, 1996 Chair Customer Services Manager Cathie Kosel Growth Management&Economic Development Agency Vice Chair 651 Pine Street,North Wing, Second Floor Gayle Bishop Martinez, CA 94553-1213 Millie Greenberg Barbara Guise Subject: Permit Process Streamlining John E.Marquez Allen Payton Dear Ms. Doten: Julie Pierce You have requested comments on your recommendations on permit streamlining. Gwen Regalia Accordingly, we have one suggestion for your consideration which relates to Tom Torlakson "Information Technology,"where you have indicated that staff reports, conditions of Hermann Welm approval, application tracking,time keeping,bond accountability and billing are all Robert K.McCleary candidates for an integrated information system. Executive Director Given the rapid explosion of access to,the Internet, and software availability, we strongly suggest that you consider establishing a site on the World Wide Web for permit information, including staff reports, conditions of approval, application forms, and other relevant information. We understand that WordPerfect 7.0 includes hypertext mark-up language(HTML). An HTML WordPerfect file could then be sent to the web service provider for direct inclusion into your web site. In fact,we are looking at establishing our own site to provide access to information such as Authority background, board agendas, project status information, etc. While some contractors may not be familiar with the World Wide Web at the present time, we believe its applications will continue to expand and grow. It offers excellent potential for improved information access to many customers of government. Oakland, for example, plans to offer access to part of its Geographic Information System (GIS) through the Web, including overlay maps of utilities, parcels, and eventually demographic information. Thank you for your inquiry. Please call me if there is any additional information or assistance that we can provide. 1340 Treat Boulevard Sincerely, Suite 150 Walnut Creek CA 94596 Obert K. cCl ary Executive D for 7 PHONE: 510/938-3970 FAX 510/938-3993 \ _ P. r3 Upper Ygnacio Valley Homeowners' Association An organization whose purpose is to maintain the present rural character, low population density and agricultural atmosphere of our area. July 23, 1996 Eileen Doten , Customer Services Manager Growth Management & Economic Development Agency 651 Pine Street, No. !-Jing , Second Floor Martinez, CA 945531213 Dear Ms. Doten: Thank you for your letter of 7/10/96 and for the information conveyed during our telephone conversation of 7/22/96 regarding the "streamlining" being under- taken by the Growth Management is Economic Development Agency. Representing the concerns of neighbors in the Upper Ygnacio Valley/ North Gate area, it is gratifying to know that you are aware of the North Gate Specific Plan adopted by the Board of Supervisors June 25, 1991 and by the City of Walnut Creek September 10, 1991 . We trust that you will honor its provisions which were worked out with a good deal of time and effort by the community development agencies of both the County and the City at a series of meetings which provided for significant imput from the residents of the area. Since many of the residents have a considerable economic investment in activ- ities such as stables , kennels, nurseries, etc, we expect that the currently allowed uses will not change in the forseeable future. We will appreciate your forwarding BY MAIL any information concerning changes or new measures affecting A-2 or R-40 zoning. We would expect to be informed BEFORE THE FACT making our imput possible. The areas within the North Gate Specific Plan that are the most sensitive to these concerns are zoned A-2 or R-40. '.le have been assured that a minimum lot size of one acre will be consistently enforced. Since your "streamlinging" process admits to resulting in reduced public accessibility & accountability, we regard it as vital that responsible neighborhood associations be informed of any proposed changes affecting them.. Again, I emphasize that this information should be conveyed BY MAIL. We are not complacent citizens , we realize constant vigilance is necessary to be assured that government agencies serve ALL the people, not just certain segments. To this end, information must be disseminated in a timely and comprehensive manner. Vie urge you to keep all property owners fully informed. Youvery trul ` Ga-i'l Landis b, 13 Attachment 4 Pacific Mutual Consultants' Recommendations for Development Process Streamlining: Comment Key: 1. Underway 2. Begin to consider in 6 months 3. Long term project Recommendation Comment 1. Develop mission statements and service level goals/measures. 2 2. Provide customer evaluation forms. 1 3. Provide sample conditions of approval, sample plan, and process checklist. 2 4. Photograph project area during site check. 2 5. Limit design review of construction on substandard lots. 2 6. Computerize project logs. (Note: Program in place, but enhancements required.) 1 7. Promote small project approvals at the permit counter. 2 8. Reduce length and complexity of staff reports. 2 9. Reduce length of time for receiving departmental response to referrals. 2 10. Use standard document format. (Note: This is the current practice, however staff will evaluate documents and update as necessary.) 2 I.I. Use formal application process schedule. 2 12. Use development review process in place of the pre-application review process. 3 13. Develop and circulate an application listing. (Note: This is the current practice. Staff will evaluate for enhancements.) 1 14. Circulate permit center employees. 3 15. Cross train employees. 3 3 16. Minimize physical separation between departments. 3 1.7. Install an automated phone system. (Note: Currently in place for Building Inspection.) 1 18. Provide self-service facilities. 3 19. Provide zoning maps and zoning indexes. 1 20. Develop computerized library of documents. (Note: Some documents including certain ordinance code titles are stored on the computer system. Staff will evaluate to augment.) 3 21. Update and regularly review all planning documents and tools. 3 22. Use Specific Plans. (Note: Underway, currently have Specific Plans for Pleasant Hill Bart, Northgate, Alhambra Valley, Dougherty Valley, and North Richmond P-1. Working on Specific Plans for Rodeo and Oakley. Specific Plan development is dependant and revenue source.) 1 23. Adopt regulations clarifying the roles of advisory committees. 3 24. Consolidate inspections departmentally. 3 25. Fast track high priority items. (Note: Clarification will need to be made regarding why a project is a higher priority than another.) 1 26. Eliminate requirement for Board of Supervisor approval of release of improvement security. 2 27. Relocate grading functions to the Public Works Department. (Note: A committee will be established to review grading functions and to develop recommendations.) 3 28. Establish computer linkage between permit Center and on-site inspectors. 3 29. Color code plans. 3 EDAz doten\strmatch.bo Request to Speak Form ( THREE (3) MINUTE LIMIT) Complete this form and place it in the box near the speakers' rostrum before addressing the Board, Name: GoV B i Crke 'hone: 9Z© 7626 5160 Cft ,: Ste.. - 1 am speaking for myself_or organization: HOM8 Bud&1�5 tram of osnle Akin CHECK ONE: �,. 1 wish to Weak on Agenda Item #; Oat MY comments will be: general ._.,Jor_"ainK---._. i wish to speak on the a bled of I do not wish to speak but leave these ewsurmseta for the Board to consider. SPEAKERS I . Deposit the "Request to Speak" form (on the reverse side) in the box next to the speaker' s microphone before your agenda item is to be considered. 2 . You will be called on to make your presentation. Please speak into the microphone at the podium. 3 . Begin by stating your name and address and whether you are speaking for yourself or as the representative of an organization. 4 . Give the Clerk a copy of your presentation or support documentation if available before speaking S . .Limit your presentation` to three xinutes . Avoid repeating comments made by previous speakers . (The Chair may limit length of presentations so all persons may be heard) . Request to Speak Form ( THREE (3) MINUTE LIMIT Complete this form and place it in the box near the speakers' rostrum be addressing the Board. !Name: /�t l� (?e ! for or am spealurRg myself,_ organ 6ww of orsandzrtp u CHECK ONE: 1 wish to speak on Agenda Item #L /� My --- --a- will be: general _,.for.49 i wish to speak on the subject of 1 do not wish to speak but leave these eonuunents for the Hard to consider: Request to Speak Form ( THREE (3) MINUTE LIMIT) Complete this form and place It in the box near the speakers' rostrum befm►re addressing the Board. Name: Air.),43 Q (�PZS-VU--0z)/Z- phone: Cr�6) Sze-y-y�lZ /address: MIME= Ckrq_.. r OS( sc� � A`� SMA for f or iution: C_ 1 am speawng �nysel .` organ CH ONE: x. 13 ��� r *sun d or�nisa�c,on) . I wish to on Item #s=Oit � My comments will be: genwW,,g�,for`against I wish to speak on the shied of I do not wish to speak but leave these commertits for the Board to consider: i SPEAKERS 1 . • Deposit the "Request to Speak" form (on the reverse `� side) in the box next to the speaker' s microphone before your agenda item is to be considered. 2 . You will be called on to snake your presentation. Please speak into the microphone at the podium. 3 . Begin by stating your name and address- and whether you are .speaking for yourself or as the. . representative of an, organization. 4 . Give -the Clerk a copy of your presentation or support documentation if available before speaking. ' 5 . ,Limit your presentation` to three minutes . Avoid repeating comments made by previous speakers. (The Chair may limit length. of presentations so all persons may be heard) .