The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMINUTES - 08131996 - C77 V77 Contra TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Costa y n. o: ;uAnw' FROM: Transportation Committee •: Coon w DATE: August 5, 1996 SUBJECT: Report on the County' s Compliance Checklist for the Contra Costa Congestion Management Program SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATIONS) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATIONS Find the policies and programs of Contra Costa County, as reported in the Compliance Checklists submitted to the Regional Transportation Planning Committees (see Exhibits A through D) , conform to the requirements for compliance with the Contra Costa Congestion Management Program (CMP) , and authorize their signature by the Chair of the Board of Supervisors . FISCAL IMPACT Compliance with the CMP will ensure the County receives its allocation of state gas tax revenues pursuant to Proposition 111 and will maintain its eligibility for other state and federal transportation revenues . These revenues are used for . transportation purposes . BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATION As the Congestion Management Agency (CMA) , the Contra Costa Transportation Authority has the responsibility of ensuring that local jurisdictions comply with the Congestion Management Program (CMP) . To monitor local compliance, the Authority has developed two checklists to ensure that the requirements of the CMP are CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: XX YES SIGNATURE RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR X RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE APPROVEOTHER -541 SIGNATURE (S) : 4egi Tom Torlakson ACTION OF BOARD ON August 13, 1996 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED X OTHER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A X UNANIMOUS (ABSENT ----------- TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN AYES: NOES: ACTION TAKEN AND ENTERED ON THE ABSENT: ABSTAIN: MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. Orig: Community Development Department ATTESTED August 13, 1996 Contact Person: Steven Goetz, 335-1240 PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERK OF cc : Public Works, TE THE B OF SUPERV S Y ADM NIS RAOR - B DEPUTY Compliance Checklists for the Congestion Management Program August 5, 1996 Page Two BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATION (continued) met . One checklist is for local jurisdictions . The other checklist is for the Regional Transportation Planning Committees (RTPC' s) . The checklist for local jurisdictions asks whether, during the July 1, 1994 to June 30, 1996 time period, each jurisdiction has met the following four requirements of the CMP - Consistency with traffic Level of Service standards; - Participation in Deficiency Plan preparation, adoption, and implementation; - Adoption of a Transportation Demand- Management ordinance; and - Evaluation of the impacts of land use decisions on the transportation system. In addition, the checklist asks whether each jurisdiction has regularly participated in RTPC planning activities and whether there is other information-that should be considered in the review of the checklist . Each jurisdiction submits their checklist first to its RTPC. The RTPC' s will compile the checklists of member jurisdictions, complete the RTPC checklist, and transmit all the checklists to the Authority by September 30, 1996 . The County' s checklists for each RTPC were completed by the Community Development Department and are attached as Exhibits A through D. The checklists certify compliance with the CMP requirements for each RTPC area. CONSEQUENCES OF NEGATIVE ACTION Failure to approve the Transportation Committee' s recommendation will cause the County to be out of compliance with the CMP, cause the State to withhold the County' s Proposition 111 allocation of gas tax revenues, lead to a reduction in road maintenance projects in unincorporated areas, and may prevent the use of future federal and state transportation revenues in the unincorporated area. SLG:cmplist .bo EXHIBIT A C,rI / o, CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATI ORIGINAL ON AUTHORITY Congestion Management Program Local Jurisdiction Compliance Checklist TRANSPLAN Local Jurisdiction Year To be filled out and submitted by local jurisdictions. Contra Costa County 1996 1. PARTICIPATION IN MULTIJURISDICTIONAL PLANNING 1-a. Since submitting its last compliance checklist,has the jurisdiction regularly participated in activities of the Regional Transportation Planning Committee(RTPC)or other forums established by the Authority? Yes No EX-1 D 2, ATTAINMENT OF TRAFFIC LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS 2-a. Has the Authority identified deficiencies on the CMP system in the jurisdiction that require preparation of Deficiency Plans(i.e.,standards are exceeded and calculation of exclusions does not eliminate the exceeded standard)? If yes, identify locations(s). Yes No ❑ 0 2-b. Has the jurisdiction been identified as contributing to a deficiency at a location in another jurisdiction,pursuant to the methodology set forth in the Authority Deficiency Plan Procedures? If yes,identify location(s). Yes No 1 October 18, 1995 EXHIBIT A if , 7 / Qt. TRANSPLAN t CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY LoeW Jurisdiction Year Congestion Management Program Local Jurisdiction Compliance Checklist Cl7ntI'8 Costa County__J rF996 3. DEFICIENCY PLAN PREPARATION,ADOPTION AND IMPLEMENTATION Answer the questions in section 3 only if a"yes"answer is given to either of the questions in section 2. Answer each of the questions in this section for each segmentlintersection requiring preparation of a Deficiency Plan. 3-a If one or more deficiencies on the CMP system is in the jurisdiction,has the jurisdiction assumed lead responsibility for dgveloping the Deficiency Plan which follows the Authority Deficiency Plan Procedures,including specifying changes to the relevant Action Plan(s)to make the Deficiency Plan consistent with RTPC policies and coordinating with other impacting localities? _ Yes No ❑ ❑ Not Applicable 3-b If the jurisdiction has been identified as contributing to a deficiency at a location in another jurisdiction,has the jurisdiction participated in preparation of a Deficiency Plan which follows the Authority Deficiency Plan Procedures, including specifying changes to the relevant Action Plan(s)to make the Deficiency Plan consistent with RTPC policies? Yes No ❑ ❑ Not Applicable - 3-c Has the Deficiency Plan been submitted to the RTPC for its review and comment? Yes No ❑ ❑ Not Applicable 3-d Has the jurisdiction adopted the Deficiency Plan at a noticed public hearing as described in the Authority Deficiency Plan Procedures? If the Deficiency Plan has not yet been adopted,please descnbe its status. Yes No ❑ ❑ Not Applicable 3-e If Deficiency Plans that identify actions that your jurisdiction must undertake have been adopted for road segments or intersections within the jurisdiction,please describe below,separately for each Deficiency Plan,the actions the jurisdiction has taken during the past year to implement adopted Deficiency Plans. Not AFnlicable 2 October 18, 1995 EXHIBIT A C'`7 7 eL ' TP,ANSPLAN 4 CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY Local Jurisdiction Year Congestion Management Program Contra Costa County 1996 Local,Jurisdiction Compliance Checklist 3-f if Deficiency Plans that identify actions that your jurisdiction must undertake have been adopted for road segments or intersections within other jurisdictions please describe below,separately for each Deficiency Plan,the actions the jurisdiction has taken during the past year to implement adopted Deficiency Plans. Not Applicable 4. LAND USE/TRANSPORTATION EVALUATION PROGRAM 4-a. Is the jurisdiction participating in the preparation,adoption and implementation of Action Plans for Routes of Regional Significance consistent with the CMP's long-range planning requirement as outlined in Option 1,Section 5.2. Yes No S ❑ 4-b (a)If no,has the jurisdiction complied with the CMP procedures,as outlined in Option 2,Section 5.2? Yes No ❑ ❑ Not Applicable 4-c. Over the past year,have traffic impact studies consistent with the Authority's Technical Procedures been conducted as part of the application review process for all development projects estimated to generate more than 100 peak-how vehicle trips? Yes No 0 ❑ 4-d. Over the past year,has the cost of mitigating the impacts of land use decisions on the regional transportation system been estimated,consistent with procedures described in the CMP,relevant Action Plans for Routes of Regional Significance,and other materials published by the Authority? Yes No a ❑ 3 October 18, 1995 EXHIBIT A S. TRIP REDUCTION AND TRAVEL DEMAND ORDINANCE 5-a. Has the jurisdiction adopted and implemented a transportation demand management ordinance as described in the CMP? (requirements are identical to those of the CCTA Growth Management Program) Yes No ® D Date Adopted 4/12/94 By Resolution N Ord'n n P 94-27 6. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS If there is any other information that the jurisdiction believes is relevant to the evaluation of conformity with the CMP,it should be attached to this checklist for consideration by the Authority. None 7. REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF CHECKLIST FOR ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORTING This checklist was prepared for submittal by: Steven L. Goetz Principal Planner (Name) (Title) (510) 335=1240 (Phone) Thejmacd/board of Supervisors has reviewed the completed checklist and found that the policies, programs,and activities of the jurisdiction as reported herein conform to the requirements for compliance with the Contra Costa Congestion Management Program. Certified: Dau: August 13, 1996 Title: air and of Supervi ors Attest: 6 'ti tyClerk, Board of Su , rvisors Deputy Clerk 4 October 18, 1995 6 .7 76 EXHIBIT B O i CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY RIGINAL Congestion Management Program Local Jurisdiction Compliance Checklist WCCTAC Local Jurisdiction Year To be filled out and submitted by local jurisdictions. Contra Costa Cotmty 1996 1. PARTICIPATION IN MULTIJURISDICTIONAL PLANNING 1-a. Since submitting its last compliance checklist,has the jurisdiction regularly participated in activities of the Regional Transportation Planning Committee(RTPC)or other forums established by the Authority? Yes No ❑ ' 2. ATTAINMENT OF TRAFFIC LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS 2-a. Has the Authority identified deficiencies on the CMP system in the jurisdiction that require preparation of Deficiency Plans(i.e.,standards are exceeded and calculation of exclusions does not eliminate the exceeded standard)? If yes, identify locations(s). Yes No ❑ o 2-b. Has the jurisdiction been identified as contributing to a deficiency at a location in another jurisdiction,pursuant to the methodology set forth in the Authority Deficiency Plan Procedures? If yes,identify location(s). Yes No 1 October 18, 1995 EXHIBIT B 6.7 7 6 T•TCCTAC CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY mal Jurisdiction yea Congestion Management Program Loin Jurisdiction Compliance Cbecklist Contra Costa COtanty 1996 3. DEFICIENCY PLAN PREPARATION,ADOPTION AND IMPLEMENTATION Answer the questions in section 3 only if a"yes"answer is given to either of the questions in section 2. Answer each of the questions in this section for each segment/intersection requiring preparation of a Deficiency Plan. 3-a If one or more deficiencies on the CMP system is in the jurisdiction,has the jurisdiction assumed lead responsibility for dpveloping the Deficiency Plan which follows the Authority Deficiency Plan Procedures,including specifying changes to the relevant Action Plan(s)to make the Deficiency Plan consistent with RTPC policies and coordinating with other impacting localities? Yes No ❑ ❑ Not Applicable 3-b If the jurisdiction has been identified as contributing to a deficiency at a location in another jurisdiction,has the jurisdiction participated in preparation of a Deficiency Plan which follows the Authority Deficiency Plan Procedures, including specifying changes to the relevant Action Plan(s)to make the Deficiency Plan consistent with RTPC policies? Yes No ❑ ❑ Not Applicable - 3-c Has the Deficiency Plan been submitted to the RTPC for its review and comment? Yes No ❑ ❑ Not Applicable 3-d Has the jurisdiction adopted the Deficiency Plan at a noticed public hearing as described in the Authority Deficiency Plan Procedures? If the Deficiency Plan has not yet been adopted,please describe its status. Yes No ❑ ❑ Not Applicable 3-e If Deficiency Plans that identify actions that your jurisdiction must undertake have been adopted for road segment or intersections within the jurisdiction,please describe below,separately for each Deficiency Plan,the actions the jurisdiction has taken during the past year to implement adopted Deficiency Plans. Not Applicable 2 October 18, 1995 EXHIBIT B 0.7 7 I_ WCTAC CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY Local Jurisdiction Year Congestion Management Program "I Jurisdiction Compliance Checklist Contra costa cmmty J1996 3-f If Deficiency Plans that identify actions that your jurisdiction must undertake have been adopted for road segments or intersections within other jurisdictions please describe below,separately for each Deficiency Plan,the actions the jurisdiction has taken during the past year to implement adopted Deficiency Plans. Not Applicable 4. ' LAND USE/TRANSPORTATION EVALUATION PROGRAM 4-a. Is the jurisdiction participating in the preparation,adoption and implementation of Action Plans for Routes of Regional Significance consistent with the CMP's long-range planning requirement as outlined in Option 1,Section 5.2. Yes No 4-b (a)If no,has the jurisdiction complied with the CMP procedures,asoutlinedin Option 2,Section 5.2? Yes No ❑ ❑ Not Applicable 4-c. Over the past year,have traffic impact studies consistent with the Authority's Technical Procedures been conducted as part of the application review process for all development projects estimated to generate more than 100 peak-hour vehicle trips? Yes No 4-d. Over the past year,has the cost of mitigating the impacts of land use decisions on the regional transportation system been estimated,consistent with procedures described in the CMP,relevant Action Plans for Routes of Regional Significance,and other materials published by the Authority? Yes No 0 ❑ 3 October 18, 1995 EXHIBIT B 5. TRIP REDUCTION AND TRAVEL DEMAND ORDINANCE ' S-a Has the jurisdiction adopted and implemented a transportation demand management ordinance as described in the CMP? (requirements are identical to those of the CCTA Growth Management Program) Yes No ® ❑ Date Adopted 4/12/94 By Resolution# O_rd?nanra 94-27 6. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS If there is any other information that the jurisdiction believes is relevant to the evaluation of conformity with the CMP,it should be attached to this checklist for consideration by the Authority. None 7. REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF CHECKLIST FOR ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORTING This checklist was prepared for submittal by: Steven L. Goetz Principal Planner (Name) (Title) (510) 335=1240 (Phone) TheSmxtt/board of Supervisors has reviewed the completed checklist and found that the policies, programs,and activities of the jurisdiction as reported herein conform to the requirements for compliance with the Contra Costa Congestion Mana ent ogram. Certified: te: August 13, 1996 Title, ai and of Su erviso Atte —Z� �MWC UO3 y Clerk , Board of Super` i cors Deputy Clerk 4 October 18, 1995 T t EXHIBIT C CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY ORIGINAL Congestion Management Program Local Jurisdiction Compliance Checklist TTAT Committee Local Jurisdiction Year To be filled our and submitted by local jurisdictions. Contra Costa Cotmty 1996 1. PARTICIPATION IN MULTIJURISDICTIONAL PLANNING 1-a. Since submitting its last compliance checklist,has the jurisdiction regularly participated in activities of the Regional Transportation Planning Committee(RTPC)or other forums established by the Authority? Yes No MV ❑ . 2. ATTAINMENT OF TRAFFIC LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS 2-a. Has the Authority identified deficiencies on the CMP system in the jurisdiction that require preparation of Deficiency Plans(i.e.,standards are exceeded and calculation of exclusions does not eliminate the exceeded standard)? If yes, identify locations(s). Yes No ❑ 0 2-b. Has the jurisdiction been identified as contributing to a deficiency at a location in another jurisdiction,pursuant to the methodology set forth in the Authority Deficiency Plan Procedures? If yes,identify location(s). Yes No 1 October 18, 1995 EXHIBIT C 77 c S.,TAT CoT-r:u_ttee i CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION AtrrHORrrV local Jurisdiction Year Congestion Management Program Loin Jurisdiction Compliance Checklist Contra Costa County1996 3. .DEFICIENCY PLAN PREPARATION,ADOPTION AND IMPLEMENTATION .Answer the questions in section 3 only if a"yes"answer is given to either of the questions in section 2. Answer each of the questions in this section for each segmentlintersection requiring preparation of a Deficiency Plan. 3-a If one or more deficiencies on the CMP system is in the jurisdiction,has the jurisdiction assumed lead responsibility for dgveloping the Deficiency Plan which follows the Authority Deficiency Plan Procedures,including specifying changes to the relevant Action Plan(s)to make the Deficiency Plan consistent with RTPC policies and coordinating with other impacting localities? _ Yes No ❑ ❑ Not Applicable 3-b If the jurisdiction has been identified as contributing to a deficiency at a location in another jurisdiction,has the jurisdiction participated in preparation of a Deficiency Plan which follows the Authority Deficiency Plan Procedures, including specifying changes to the relevant Action Plan(s)to make the Deficiency Plan consistent with RTPC policies? Yes No ❑ ❑ Not Applicable . 3-c Has the Deficiency Plan been submitted to the RTPC for its review and comment? Yes No ❑ ❑ Not Applicable 3-d Has the jurisdiction adopted the Deficiency Plan at a noticed public hearing as described in the Authority Deficiency Plan Procedures? If the Deficiency Plan has not yet been adopted,please describe its status. Yes No ❑ ❑ Not Applicable 3-e If Deficiency Plans that identify actions that your jwisdicdon must undertake have been adopted for road segments or intersections within the jurisdiction,please describe below,separately for each Deficiency Plan,the actions the jurisdiction has taken during the past year to implement adopted Deficiency Plans. Not A=Iicable 2 October 18, 1995 EXHIBIT C 1. .77G ' T.Pff- Conni ttee ' CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY Local Jurisdiction Year Congestion Management Program Local Jurisdicdon Compliance Checklist Contra Costa Cmmty J 11996 3-f if Deficiency Plans that identify actions that your jurisdiction must undertake have been adopted for road segments or intersections within other jurisdictions please describe below,separately for each Deficiency Plan,the actions the jurisdiction has taken during the past year to implement adopted Deficiency Plans. Not Applicable 4. LAND USE/TRANSPORTATION EVALUATION PROGRAM 4-a. Is the jurisdiction participating in the preparation,adoption and implementation of Action Plans for Routes of Regional Significance consistent with the CMP's long-range planning requirement as outlined in Option 1,Section 5.2., Yes No D ❑ 4-b (a)If no,has the jurisdiction complied with the CMP procedures,as outlined in Option 2,Section 5.2? Yes No ❑ ❑ Not Applicable 4-c. Over the past year,have traffic impact studies consistent with the Authority's Technical Procedures been conducted as part of the application review process for all development projects estimated to generate more than 100 peak-hour vehicle trips? Yes No M ❑ 4-d. Over the past year,has the cost of mitigating the impacts of land use decisions on the regional transportation system been estimated,consistent with procedures described in the CMP,relevant Action Plans for Routes of Regional Significance,and other materials published by the Authority? Yes No 3 October 18, 1995 EXHIBIT C t --7-7 G 5. TRIP REDUCTION AND TRAVEL DEMAND ORDINANCE ' S-a Has the jurisdiction adopted and implemented a transportation demand management ordinance as described in the CMP? (requirements are identical to those of the CCTA Growth Management Program) Yes No ® ❑ Date Adopted 4/12/94 By Resolution# Ordinaric 94-27 6. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS If there is any other information that the jurisdiction believes is relevant to the evaluation of conformity with the CMP,it should be attached to this checklist for consideration by the Authority. None 7. REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF CHECKLIST FOR ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORTING This checklist was prepared for submittal by: Steven L. Goetz Principal Planner (Name) (Title) (510) 335=1240 (Phone) ThesmnclJboard of Supervisors has reviewed the completed checklist and found that the policies, programs,and activities of the j urisdiction as reported herein conform to the requirements for compliance with the Contra Costa Conge 'on M eme Pro Certified: Date: August 13, 1996 Title: p of Supervisors Attest: t Ity;Clerk, Board of Super-vi s Deputy Clerk 4 October 18, 1995 EXHIBIT D_ � .-7-7 CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY ORIGINAL Congestion Management Program Local Jurisdiction Compliance Checklist TP.ANS PAC Local Jurisdiction Year To befilled out and submitted by local jurisdictions. Contra Costa County 1996 1. PARTICIPATION IN MULTIJURISDICTIONAL PLANNING 1-a. Since submitting its last compliance checklist,has the jurisdiction regularly participated in activities of the Regional Transportation Planning Committee(RTPC)or other forums established by the Authority? Yes No FE ❑ 2. ATTAINMENT OF TRAFFIC LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS 2-a. Has the Authority identified deficiencies on the CMP system in the jurisdiction that require preparation of Deficiency Plans(i.e.,standards are exceeded and calculation of exclusions does not eliminate the exceeded standard)? If yes, identify locations(s). Yes No 2-b. Has the jurisdiction been identified as contributing to a deficiency at a location in another jurisdiction,pursuant to the methodology set forth in the Authority Deficiency Plan Procedures? If yes,identify location(s). Yes No 1 October 18, 1995 EXHIBIT D URANSPAC CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION ALTrHORiTY Local Jurisdiction Year Congestion Management Program COr1tT 8 Costa County Jurisdiction Compliance Cbecldist Loin 1996 3. DEFICIENCY PLAN PREPARATION,ADOPTION AND IMPLEMENTATION Answer the questions in section 3 only if a"yes"answer is given to either of the questions in section 2. Answer each of the questions in this section for each segment/mtersection requiring preparation of a Deficiency Plan. 3-a If one or more deficiencies on the CMP system is in the jurisdiction,bas the jurisdiction assumed lead responsibility for d;veloping the Deficiency Plan which follows the Authority Deficiency Plan Procedures,including specifying changes to the relevant Action Plan(s)to make the Deficiency Plan consistent with RTPC policies and coordinating with other impacting localities? Yes No ❑ ❑ Not Applicable 3-b If the jurisdiction has been identified as contributing to a deficiency at a location in another jurisdiction,has the jurisdiction participated in preparation of a Deficiency Plan which follows the Authority Deficiency Plan Procedures, including specifying changes to the relevant Action Plan(s)to make the Deficiency Plan consistent with RTPC policies? Yes No ❑ ❑ Not Applicable - 3-c Has the Deficiency Plan been submitted to the RTPC for its review and comment? Yes No ❑ ❑ Not Applicable 3-d Has the jurisdiction adopted the Deficiency Plan at a noticed public hearing as described in the Authority Deficiency Plan Procedures? If the Deficiency Plan has not yet been adopted,please describe its status. Yes No ❑ ❑ Not Applicable 3-e If Deficiency Plans that identify actions that your jurisdiction must undertake have been adopted for road segments or intersections within the jurisdiction,please describe below,separately for each Deficiency Plan,the actions the jurisdiction has taken during the past year to implement adopted Deficiency Plans. Not AWlicable 2 October 18, 1995 EXHIBIT D 1_P.APISPAC CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY Local Jurisdiction Year Congestion Management Program Local Jurisdiction Compliance Cbeckllst Contra Costa Count 1996 3-f if Deficiency Plans that identify actions that your jurisdiction must undertake have been adopted for road segments or intersections within other jurisdictions please describe below,separately for each Deficiency Plan,the actions the jurisdiction has taken during the past year to implement adopted Deficiency Plans. Not Applicable 4. LAND USE/TRANSPORTATION EVALUATION PROGRAM 4-a. Is the jurisdiction participating in the preparation,adoption and implementation of Action Plans for Routes of Regional Significance consistent with the CMP's long-range planning requirement as outlined in Option 1,Section 5.2. Yes No 4-b (a)If no,has the jurisdiction complied with the CMP procedures,as outlined in Option 2,Section 5.2? Yes No ❑ ❑ Not Applicable 4-e. Over the past year,have traffic impact studies consistent with the Authority's Technical Procedures been conducted as part of the application review process for all development projects estimated to generate more than 100 peak-hour vehicle trips? Yes No 0 ❑ 4-d. Over the past year,has the cost of mitigating the impacts of land use decisions on the regional transportation system been estimated,consistent with procedures described in the CMP,relevant Action Plans for Routes of Regional Significance,and other materials published by the Authority? Yes No a ❑ 3 October 18, 1995 • EXHIBIT D S. TRIP REDUCTION AND TRAVEL DEMAND ORDINANCE 5-a. Has the jurisdiction adopted and implemented a transportation demand management ordinance as described in the CMP? (requirements are identical to those of the CCTA Growth Management Program) Yes No ® ❑ Date Adopted 4/1?/94 By Resolution# Ord?nancP 94-27 6. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS If there is any other information that the jurisdiction believes is relevant to the evaluation of conformity with the CMP,it should be attached to this checklist for consideration by the Authority. None 7. REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF CHECKLIST FOR ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORTING This checklist was prepared for submittal by: Steven L. Goetz Principal Planner (Name) (Title) (510) 335=1240 (Phone) TheXmxddUard of Supervisors has reviewed the completed checklist and found that the policies, programs,and activities of the jurisd' ' n as reported herein conform to the requirements for compliance with the Contra Costa Con ion Manag Program. Certified: tDate: August 13, 1996 Title: 1 oard of Supervi rs Atte r GCS tJtXvcl�f�D1515tgcClerk,Board of Super sors Deputy Clerk 4 October 18, 1995