Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 09121995 - D7 ITEM # D.7 TO.A BOARD OF SUPERVISORS 5 Contra FROM; Phil Batchelor, County Administrator Costa Mark Finucane, Health Services Director � : County 7: v DATE: September 6, 1995cuun SUBJECT: UNOCAL SAFETY AUDIT SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. APPROVE the general direction staff is taking in preparing the Scope of Work for the.Safety Audit of the Unocal San Francisco Refinery [See Attachment # 1] and the process which is being followed to obtain public input on the Scope of Work prior to its being finalized and issued in the form of an RFP [See Attachment# 2]. 2. APPROVE in general the schedule [Attachment# 3] and timeline [Attachment# 4] for the audit, recognizing that there may have to be further adjustments to the schedule and timeline as future events dictate. 3. APPROVE the process which is outlined below for releasing the RFP for the audit, for reviewing the responses and for selecting a contractor to perform the audit: A. APPROVE the following composition of the panel which will review the responses to the RFP, interview the top responders and select a contractor to be recommended to the Board of Supervisors: ✓ Staff from the County Health Services Department ✓ Staff from the Bay Area Air Quality Management District, if they wish to serve on the panel. ✓ Staff from Cal-OSHA, if they wish to serve on the panel. ✓ Staff from State OES, if they wish to serve on the panel. ✓ Staff from Unocal. ✓ Two community representatives, selected by the Board of Supervisors, using the criteria outlined below: _ Q CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: YES SIGNATURE: (\1 Y XX RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE(S): ACTION OF BOARD ON Sento 1211995 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED X OTHER X The Board APPROVED the recommendations set forth above as amended to expand the membership of the Audit Panel to include a representative of the Oil Chemical & Atomic workers Union, .a representative of Citizens for a Better Environment, and four community representatives. The Board also DIRECTED that the final scope of the work to be performed for the Safety Audit be reviewed by the Board of Supervisors prior to releasing the RFP for the audit. See Addenda A for the list of individuals speaking on this matter. VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE XX UNANIMOUS(ABSENT I ) AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD ABSENT: ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. ATTESTED September 12 , 1995 Contact: PHIL BATCHELOR,CLERK OF THE BOARD OF CC. SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR See page 3. BY�L� �C"2� ,DEPUTY . s\ r 0 B. APPROVE the following criteria for selecting the community members who will participate in the selection of the contractor and who will monitor the audit itself: ✓ The individuals must be residents of the Crockett - Rodeo area, preferably one each from Crockett and from Rodeo. ✓ The individuals must be able to commit the time necessary to monitor the audit process, either directly by accompanying the auditors on the audit or by making arrangements for other acceptable means of monitoring the process and activities. ✓ The individuals should be members of the Good Neighbor Audit Committee or the Community Advisory Panel (CAP). [See Attachment # 5 for lists of these individuals]. ✓ The individuals must be prepared to sign a confidentiality agreement in order to participate in any portions of the audit which may involve viewing or receiving access to confidential material. ✓ The individuals must not have a conflict of interest, defined as being the named plaintiff in an individual lawsuit against Unocal [this does not include individuals who have asked to be made a part of a class action lawsuit against Unocal]. C. SELECT two community representatives who will participate in the selection of the contractor and who will monitor the audit process itself. 4. DIRECT the County Administrator and Health Services Director to return to the Board of Supervisors once a proposed contractor has been selected with a proposed contract for the Safety Audit for the Board's further consideration, preferably on December 19, 1995. 5. AGREE to hold a meeting of the Board of Supervisors in the Rodeo/Crockett area to receive a final report on the results of the Safety Audit using the Board's third Tuesday evening meeting, probably on April 16, 1996. BACKGROUND: On July 11, 1995, the Board of Supervisors directed the County Administrator, Health Services Director, Community Development Director, and County Counsel, in consultation with the Bay Area Air Quality Management District, to draft a contract between Contra Costa County and Unocal to define a scope of a thorough Safety Audit of the Unocal Rodeo facility to be done by an independent auditor. A series of four meetings have been held to date involving staff from each of these offices and agencies as well as representatives from Unocal. These meetings have resulted in the development of a final draft Scope of Work. This final draft Scope of Work has been mailed to the attached list of some 60 individuals and organizations for their comments [see Attachment # 6]. Those comments must be postmarked to the Health Services Department by September 29, 1995. In addition, some 55 other individuals and organizations, including city officials, have been advised of the availability of and been offered the opportunity to receive a copy of the Scope of Work if they wish to review it [see Attachment #7]. Finally, a press release has been issued noting the availability of the final draft Scope of Work and requesting comments by September 29, 1995 [see Attachment# 8]. Health Services Department staff will review all comments and incorporate them in the final Scope of Work as appropriate. All written comments that are received will be responded to in writing. Staff will also meet upon request with interested individuals and groups to review comments and responses. A Request for Proposals (RFP) is being developed which will be issued to qualified potential contractors. A Panel is being formed consisting of County staff, selected community representatives, Unocal staff, and regional and State agencies which wish to participate on the Panel. This panel will review all of the responses to the RFP, select the top proposals and conduct interviews with the top firms. From these interviews, one firm will be chosen to perform the audit. A contract is being developed by the County Counsel's Office and Unocal's legal staff which will be entered into by the two parties. This contract is tentatively scheduled to be forwarded to the Board of 2 Supervisors for approval on December 19, 1995: The current schedule calls for the contractor to complete preliminary work during January and the first half of February, and for the onsite Safety Audit to be completed during the latter half of February and the first half of March, 1996. A final report on the audit results will be presented to representatives of the County, communities, and Unocal at the audit closing conference. Two meetings will be held following the audit. The first meeting will be with the audit contractors, representatives of the County, the designated community representatives and Refinery management approximately one week after the audit closing conference. This meeting will be to discuss the final report with the contractor and receive any necessary clarification. The second meeting will include a presentation by County staff and the contractor to the Board of Supervisors and the public. We are recommending that this second meeting be held on a Tuesday evening in the community, using the Board's third Tuesday evening meeting during April, 1996. List of Attachments to this report: 1. Final draft Scope of Work. 2. Process for obtaining public comments on the Scope of Work. 3. Schedule for conducting the Safety Audit. 4. Timeline for,conducting the Safety Audit. 5. List of the members of the Good Neighborhood Audit Committee and the Unocal Community Advisory Panel. 6. List of individuals to whom the Scope of Work has been mailed for comments. 7. List of other individuals who have been advised of the availability of the Scope of Work for comment. 8. Copy of the press release which has been issued. cc: County Administrator Health Services Director Community Development Director County Counsel Jeffrey Wilkes,General Manager Unocal San Francisco Refinery 1380 San Pablo Avenue Rodeo, CA 94572-1299 Bay Area Air Quality Management District .Tern Kaj-as , Anr 3 i D.7 ADDENDA A The following persons spoke on issues relative to the Unocal Safety Audit: Jeff Wilkes, Unocal, 1380 San Pablo Avenue, Rodeo; Joanne Stark Mechling, Mothers Against Dioxin, 607 Second Avenue, Crockett; Andrew J. Mechling, 607 Second Avenue, Crockett; Dick Zampa, Tormey Citizens, 166 Old County Road, Tormey, Crockett; Donald B. Brown, Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers Union, Local 1-316, 1801 Sonoma Blue, #117, Vallejo; Denny Larson, Citizens for a Better Environment, (no address given) San Francisco; and Greg Feere, Contra Costa Building Trades Council, 935 Alhambra Avenue, Martinez. • I ATTACHMENT# 1 FINAL DRAFT August 28, 1995 Unocal, San Francisco Refinery Safety Audit of the Rodeo Facility Statement of Scope Background Past incidents that have occurred at the Unocal Refinery are of concern to the residents of the Hercules, Rodeo, Tormey, and Crockett areas. Incidents that have recently occurred are: the Catacarb release that began on August 22, 1994 and continued through September 6, 1994 originating from the Unocal Regeneration Tower D409; a hydrogen sulfide release on 9/15/94 caused by an unplanned shutdown of the odor abatement compressors; public nuisance at Hillcrest School due to odors on 3/28/95 caused by an open hatch on Tank 150 which contained sour oil and water; odor complaints on 4/6/95 and 4/24/95 originating from Tank 294 which contained sour water; and a seal fire and subsequent odors on June 16, 1995 at Tank 288, containing sour naphtha and sour water. In response to these incidents, the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors has directed the County Counsel, County Health Services Department, County Administrator, Community Development Department, and requested the Bay Area Air Quality Management District to develop a contract with Unocal to define a scope for a thorough Safety Audit of the Rodeo facility. Of additional interest is that on April 7, 1995 the Unocal, 76 Products Company entered into a Good Neighbor Agreement with community groups in the Crockett/Rodeo area. A portion of the Good Neighbor Agreement requires an independent audit (by a contractor) of the Refinery's emergency response plan, emergency notification procedures, safety management program, and the results of process hazards analyses performed as part of the Process Safety Management Program (mandated by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration). Requirements The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors has directed that the Safety Audit of the Refinery will include the following: evaluation of actions to prevent future failures such as operational changes, policy changes, increased or focused maintenance, new training and certification of employees, and other appropriate actions; FINAL 1R,4FT August 28, 1995 assurance of methods for prop; ;prioritization of action items and auditing to ensure completion of action items; and a provision for public input on audit scope issues. Scope of Work The audit will be conducted at the Unocal San Francisco Refinery and will include the following elements: 1. review of the findings from the independent safety audit conducted at the Unocal Refinery pursuant to the Unocal Good Neighbor Agreement which included an audit of the Refinery's a. emergency response plan, b. emergency notification procedures, c. safety management program. and d. the results of process hazards analyses performed as part of the Process Safety Management Program; 2. Review of Unocal corrective action plans, and the status thereof, which resulted from non-privileged Unocal incident investigation records from 1992 to present; 3. review/evaluation of selected written operating procedures for the process units; 4. review/evaluation of the Operator Training Program including applicable training on operating procedures, emergency shut-downs, emergency response/notification procedures, and certification of employees; 5. re iew/evaluation of contra: +,,r training program and standards for contractor qualifications; 6. review of Unocal oversight of contract workers; 7. review of the quality assurance program for positive materials (equipment) identification and confirmation of satisfied design standards; 8. review of the preventive and predictive maintenance program including the frequency of inspections and standards for determination of acceptable testing/inspection results; 9. review/evaluation of the Unocal Management of Change program and implementation of the program; 10. review/evaluation of a portion of Unocal's Loss Control Management policies and procedures; 11. review of the status of the Unocal action items resulting from the Catacarb release (corrective action plan); and Page 2 FINAL DRAFT-August 28, 1995 12. review of Unocal's corrective action plans addressing the Bay Area Air Quality Management District findings and recommendations that have been provided to Unocal regarding the incidents listed above in Background. The audit will include a review and evaluation of the applicable programs, policies, procedures, and records with respect to the criteria delineated below. 1. Review of the findings from the independent safety audit conducted at the Unocal Refinery pursuant to the Unocal Good Neighbor Agreement. Review of the findings from the evaluation of the Refinery's Emergency Response Plan and procedures manual for determination of the level of compliance with the requirements of 8 CCR 5192(q). Review of the findings of the evaluation of the facility's past performance in implementing the Emergency Response Plan and the effectiveness thereof. Review of the evaluation of the effectiveness of the Refinery's Emergency Notification Procedures. Review of the evaluation of the Refinery's Injury and Illness Prevention Program for determination of the program's level of compliance with the requirements of 8 CCR 3203. Audit of the Injury Illness and Prevention Program will include safe and healthy work practices, communication to employees regarding occupational health and safety and reporting of hazards to employer, procedures for identifying and evaluating work place hazards, procedures to investigate occupational injuries or illnesses, and methods for correcting unsafe working conditions. Review of the evaluation of the Refinery's Process Hazards Analyses for determination of the analyses level of compliance with the requirements .of 8 CCR 5189(e). 2. Review/evaluate Unocal's Incident Investigation Program from non-privileged Unocal incident investigation records from 1992 to present. The Refinery's Incident Investigation program will be reviewed using Cal/OSHA's"Guideline for Process Safety Management Audit" prepared for 8 CCR 5189 (m) attached (Attachment A). Non-privileged incident reports of spills or releases from 1992 to present which resulted in or had the potential for a spill or release of hazardous materials will be summarized to determine possible patterns/trends in the Refinery operations. Those incident reports will also be reviewed for determination of root cause analyses and completion of all identified action items resulting from the incident investigation. 3. Review/evaluation of selected written operating procedures for the processes. Selected Unocal written operating procedures will be reviewed and evaluated for adequacy utilizing the "Guideline for Process Safety Management Audit" prepared for 8 CCR 5189 (f) (Attachment B) by the Cal/OSHA Consultation Service. A minimum of three operating procedures for portions of refinery units will be reviewed. Page 3 1 1 FINAL DRAFT August 28, 1995 4. Review/evaluation of the Operator Training Program including applicable training on operating procedures, emergency shut-downs, emergency response/notification procedures, and certification of employees. The Unocal Operator Training Program will be reviewed and evaluated for adequacy utilizing the "Guideline for Process Safety Management Audit" prepared for 8 CCR 5189 (g) (Attachment C) by the Cal/OSHA Consultation Service. 5. Review/evaluation of contractor training_program and standards for contractor qualifications. The Unocal Contractor Training Program will be reviewed and evaluated for adequacy utilizing the "Guideline for Procesi Safety Management Audit" prepared for 8 CCR 5189 (h) (Attachment D) by the Cal/OSH-, Consultation Service. 6. Review of Unocal oversight of contract workers. The oversight by Unocal of contract workers will be reviewed utilizing the attached questions (Attachment E). 7. Review of the quality assurance program for positive materials (eauipment) identification and confirmation of satisfied design standards. The Unocal quality assurance program for positive materials identification and confirmation of satisfied design standards will be reviewed for adequacy utilizing the "Guideline for Process Safety Management Audit" prepared for 8 CCR 5189 0) (Attachment F) by the Cal/OSHA Consultation Service. 8. Review of the preventive and predictive maintenance program including the frequency of inspections and standards for determination of acceptable testing/inspection results. The Unocal preventive maintenance program will be reviewed for adequacy utilizing the "Guideline for Process Safety Management Audit" prepared for 8 CCR 5189 0) (Attachment F) by the Cal/OSHA Consultation Service. 9. Review/evaluation of the Unocal Management of Change program and implementation of the program. The Unocal Management of Change program will be reviewed for adequacy utilizing the "Guideline for Process Safety Management Audit" prepared for 8 CCR 5189 (1) (Attachment G) by the Cal/OSHA Consultation Service. At least three Management of Change documents that deal with process changes and have been completed in the 2 years preceding the audit will be reviewed for completeness and Page 4 FINAL,DRAFT August 28, 1995 interface issues with the various Unocal departments. 10. Review/evaluation of a portion of Unocal's Loss Control Management policies and procedures Unocal Refinery's Loss Control Management programs, policies, and procedures for Leadership and Administration, Personal Communication and Group Communication will be reviewed and evaluated. Attached are the sub elements of these programs that are to be reviewed and evaluated (Attachment H). 11. Review of the status of the Unocal action items resulting from Catacarb release(corrective action lan . The Unocal Catacarb Corrective Action Plan (Attachment I)will be reviewed and audited to verify completeness/status of action items. 12.. Review of Unocal's corrective action plans addressing the Bay Area Air Quality Mana emmeent District findings and recommendations that have been provided to Unocal. The Bay Area Air.Quality Management District and the Health Services Department will review Unocal's corrective action plans and implementation schedules to address findings and recommendations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District that have been provided to Unocal regarding the incidents listed above under "Background". Project Deliverables Prior to beginning the audit, and within two weeks after executing a contract with the County for this Project, the Contractor must deliver twelve copies of the auditing protocols for this audit to the County. The protocols must cover all audit subjects as defined in the Scope of Work. Protocols should include auditing methodology, applicable regulatory requirements, physical inspections, employee interviews and sampling methodology. Up to two weeks will be allowed for review and approval of the auditing protocols by the County and Unocal. Project deliverables will include twenty copies and one camera ready copy of a written report including an executive summary and a layman summary (if different from the executive summary). The report will also include a summary of the elements of the audit, including, findings of the audit, such as practices that are working and practices needing to be modified, recommendations for changes,and compliance exceptions and recommendations in the tabular format shown in Attachment I. The report will be completed and finalized at the San Francisco Refinery at the conclusion of the audit. The County will be provided and will retain ownership of all auditing protocols, reports, memorandums and other work products from this audit. All deliverables will be provided to the County Project Manager. The County will distribute the final report to interested community members and Unocal. Page 5 FINAL DRAFT August 28, 1995 The Contractor's audit team will meet periodically during the audit with the County Project Manager, Refinery staff and representatives from the Health Services Department, County Community Development_. County Counsel, County District Attorney, and County Administrator's Office to review audit progress and status. The Contractor's audit team will hold a closing conference with representatives from the County, representatives from the communities and the Refinery Management on the last day of the audit to discuss the audit results. The closing audit report will be due to the County Project Manager at the audit closing conference. Proposals should include provisions for two four-hour meetings. The first meeting will be with representatives from the County, representatives from.the communities and the Refinery Management. approximately one week after the closing audit report. This meeting will be for discussing comments and clarifications from the closing report in preparation for the final report. The second meeting will include a presentation by County staff and the contractor to the Board of Supervisors and the communities. The first meeting will be approximately one week after the close of the audit and will be scheduled at the convenience of the County, the community representatives, Unocal and the Contractor. The second meeting will be on a Tuesday evening within one month of the completion of the audit. Page 6 FINAL DRAFT' August 28, 1995 Attachment A Review of Incident Investigations 5189 (m) : INCIDENT INVESTIGATIONS I . PROGRAM SUMMARY The employer is required to investigate each incident which resulted in, or could reasonably have resulted in a catastrophic release of highly hazardous chemical in the workplace. An investigation shall be initiated no later than 48 hours following the incident. An investigation team shall be established and a report prepared which includes: 1) Date of incident 2) Date investigation began 3) Description of incident 4) Factors that contributed to the incident 5) Recommendations from the investigation. The employer is required to establish a system to promptly address the incident report findings and recommendations, 'documenting all resolutions and corrective actions. Incident reports shall be reviewed with all affected personnel whose job tasks are relevant to the investigation and retained for five years. II. QUALITY CRITERIA REFERENCES A. 5189 m) : Incident Investigations III. VERIFICATION OF PROGRAM ELEMENTS Criteria Net Reference y/K A. Records Review 1. Has each incident been investigated which resulted in 5189(m) or could reasonably have resulted in a catastrophic release (1) of highly hazardous chemicals in the workplace? 2. Have incident investigations been initiated as promptly 5189(m) as possible, but not later than 48 hours following the (2) incident? 5189 (m) : INCIDENT. INVESTIGATIONS B. on-site Conditions 1. Do observations of a representative sample of process 5189(m) components involved in incident investigations indicate that (6) recommendations have been resolved? (Compare the corrective actions outlined in the investigation documentation with the actual equipment, procedures, material use, etc.) C. Interviews 1. Based on interviews with a representative number of 5189(m) operators, maintenance employees and contractor employees, (1) have all incidents that resulted in or could reasonably have resulted in a catastrophic release of highly hazardous chemicals in the workplace, been investigated? 5189 (m) : INCIDENT INVESTIGATIONS 6. Have resolutions and corrective actions from the 5189(m) incident investigation reports been documented? 7. Have incident investigation reports been reviewed with 5189)m) all affected personnel whose job tasks are relevant to the (5) incident findings including contract employees, where applicable? S. Are incident investigation reports retained for five 5189(m) years? (7) 5189 (m) : INCIDENT INVESTIGATIONS 3. Have incident investigation teams been established? Do 5189(m) the teams contain at least one person knowledgeable in the (3) process involved in the incident, and other members with appropriate knowledge and experience to thoroughly investigate and analyze the incident? Has a contractor employee been included in the team if the incident involved work of the contractor? 4. Have incident investigation reports been prepared at the 5189(m) conclusion of the investigation which include at minimum: (4) • Date of the incident? (A) 0 Date the inspection began? (B) * A description of the incident? (C) • The factors that contributed to the incident? (D) e Any recommendations resulting from the (E) investigation? 5. Has a system been established to promptly address and 5189(m) resolve the incident investigation report findings and (6) recommendations? FINAL DRAFT August 28, 1995 Attachment B Review of Written Operating Procedures 5189 (f) : OPERATING PROCEDURES I. PROGRAM SUMMARY The intent of this paragraph is to provide clear instruction for conducting activities involved in covered processes that are consistent with the process safety information. The operating procedures must address steps for each operating phase, operating limits, safety and health considerations, and safety systems and their functions. II. QUALITY CRITERIA REFERENCES A. 5189 (f) D. 5155 B. 5192 E. 5194 C. 3314 III. VERIFICATION OF PROGRAM ELEMENTS criteria Met Reference YIN A. Records Review 1. Do written operating procedures exist for each covered 5189 (f) process? Do the procedures provide clear instructions for (1) conductin^r :activities safely? 2. Do the operating instructions address, as a minimum, 5189 (f) ' steps for each operating phase, including: (1) (A) • Initial start-up? (1) • Normal operations? (2) • Temporary operations?._ (3) • Emergency shutdowns? (4) • Conditions requiring emergency shutdown? • Assignment of shutdown- responsibility to qualified operators? • Emergency operations? • Normal shutdown? (5) • Start-ups following a turnaround or emergency (6) shutdown? 5189 (f) : OPERATING PROCEDURES 3. Do the operating procedures include operating limits 5189(f) that outline consequences of process deviation and steps (1) (B) required to correct or avoid deviations? 1,2,3 4. Have safety and health considerations been included in 5189(f) the operating procedures? Do they include at a minimum: . (1) (C) • Properties of, and hazards presented by, chemicals (1) used in the process? • Precautions necessary to prevent exposure, including (2) engineering controls, administrative controls, and personal protective equipment? • Control measures to be taken if physical contact or (3) airborne exposure occurs? • Quality control for raw materials and control of (4) hazardous chemical inventory levels? • Any special or unique hazards? (6) 5. Are safety systems and their functions included in the 5189(f) operating procedures? (2) 6. Are the operating instructions consistent with the 5189(f) process safety information? (2) 5189 (f) : OPERATING PROCEDURES 7. Are operating procedures readily accessible to employees 5189(f) who work in or maintain a process? (2) 8. Are operating procedures reviewed as often as necessary 5189 M to assure that they reflect current operating practice? Are (3) they certified annually by the tni-.ployer that they are current and accurate? Do they reflect current operating practice that have resulted from chwnges in: • Process chemicals? • Technology? • Equipment? • Facilities? 9. Have safe work practices been developed and implemented 5189(f) for employees and contractors to control hazards during operations such as: • Lockout/tagout? • Confined space entry? • Opening process equipment or piping? • Control over entrance into a facility by maintenance, contractor, laboratory- or- other support personnel? B. On-site Conditions 5189 M (2) 1. Does observation of a representative sample of processes indicate that the written operating procedures are being implemented? 5189 (f) : OPERATING PROCEDURES 2. Does observation of a representative sample of processes 5189(f) indicate that the written operating procedures are readily (2) accessible to employees who work or maintain a process? 3. Does observation of a representative sample of processes 5189(f) indicate that operating procedures reflect current practice, (3) including changes that result from process chemicals, technology, equipment, and facilities? (Observe to see if 'actual procedures match the written operating procedures.) 4. Does observation of representative operations indicate 5189 that safe work practices have been implemented for company (4) and contractor employees? Do such work practices include, where appropriate: • Lockout/tagout? • Confined space entry? • opening process equipment or piping? • Control over entrance into a facility by maintenance, contractor, laboratory, and other support personnel? 5189 (f) : OPERATING PROCEDURES C. Interviews 1. ' Based on interviews with a representative number of 5189(f) operators, are the written operating procedures implemented (1) for each covered process? 2. Based on interviews with a representative number of 5189(f) operators, do operating procedures p:covide clear (1) instructions for safely conducting activities7' (Specifically ask for conditions requiring emergency shutdown, the operating limits of a particular process or item of equipment, what might occur if a deviation from those limits should take place, steps to avoid the deviation, and precautions necessary to prevent exposurto hazardous chemicals. ) 3. Based on interviews with a representative number of 5189(f) employees who work in or maintain a process, are the (2) operating procedures readily accessible? 4. Based on interviews with a representative number of 5189(f) operators and maintenance employees, do the operating (3) procedures reflect current operating practice? � 1 FINAL DRAFT August 28, 1995 Attachment C Review of Operator Training Program 5189 (g) : TRAINING I. PROGRAM SM4MARY The intent of this section helps employees understand the nature and causes of problems arising from process operations, and increases employee awareness with respect to the hazards particular to a process. An effective training program significantly reduces the number and severity of incidents arising from process operations, and can be instrumental in preventing small problems from leading to a catastrophic release. Minimum requirements for an effective training program include: Initial Training, Refresher Training, and Certification records. 11. QUALITY CRITERIA REFERENCES A. 5189(g) : Training B. 5189(f) (1) : Operating procedures CrItoria III. VERIFICATION OF PROGRAM ELEMENTS Itaftrence A. Records Review 5189(g) (1) 1. For employees involved in operating a process do initial and refresher training records exist? Do the records contain the identity of the employee, the date of the training, and the means used to verify that the employee understood the training? 2. Has the employer consulted with employees involved -in operating .the process to determine the appropriate frequency for refresher training? Is the frequency at 5189(8) least once every 3 years? (2) 5189 (g) : TRAINING 3 . Is there written certification that they have the 5189(g) required knowledge, skills and abilities to safely carry (3) out the duties and responsibilities specified in the operating procedures? (Review the documents to make sure the certification has not be invalidated by a change in duties. ) 4. Has each employee involved in operating a process 5189 (g) been trained in an overview of the process and the operating procedures including: • Steps for each operating phase? Initial startup, normal operations, temporary operations, emergency shutdown, emergency operations, normal shutdown, and startup following a turnaround or emergency shutdown 0 Operating limits? Consequences of deviations and steps required to avoid deviations • Safety and health considerations? Properties.and-hazards of chemicals used and precautions for preventing exposure- 0 Safety systems and their functions? B. On-site Conditions Verification is not required. It 5189 (9') : TRAINING C. Interviews 1. Based on interviews with a representative number of 5189(8) employees, has their training emphasized specific safety and health hazards, emergency operations including shutdown, and safe work practices applicable to their tasks? 2. Based on interviews with employees named as having 5189(8) provided consultation, has the employer consulted with (2) employees involved in operating the process to determine the appropriate frequency of refresher training? R FINAL DRAFT August 28, 1995 Attachment D Review of Contractor Training Program 5189 (h) CONTRACTORS I. PROGRAM SUMMARY The intent of this section is to require employers who use contractors to perform work in and around processes that involve highly hazardous chemicals to establish a screening process so that they hire and use contractors who accomplish the desired job tasks without compromising the safety and health of employees at a facility. The contractor must assure that contract employees are trained on performing the job safely, of the hazards related to the job, and applicable provisions of the emergency action plan. 11. QUALITY CRITERIA REFERENCES A. 5189 (h) Contractors B. 5189(f) (4) Operating Procedures C. 5189(n) Emergency Planning Criteria Met 111. VERIFICATION OF PROGRAM ELEMENTS Reference YIN A. Records Review - Employer' s Program 5189 (h) 1. Does the program include all contractors performing maintenance or repair, turnaround, major renovation or specialty work on or adjacent to covered processes? (Contractors performing incidental services which do not influence process safety such as janitorial work, food and, drink services, laundry, delivery, and other supply services need not be included.) 2. is the information regarding the contractor's safety 5189 (h) performance and programs obtained and evaluated for selection (5) of contractors? 5189 (h) CONTRACTORS 3 . Are the contract employers informed of the known 5189(h) potential fire, explosion, or toxic release hazards related (1) to the contractor's work and the processes? 4. Are contract employers informed of the applicable 5189(h) provisions of the emergency action plan required by 5189 (n) ? (2) 5. Have safe work.- practices to control the entrance, 5189(h) presence and exit of - contract - employers and contract (1) employees in covered. process areas been developed and implemented? 5189 (h) CONTRACTORS 6. Are contract employers evaluated for their performance in 5189 (h) fulfilling their obligatiomy to: (6) • Assure their employees are trained in safe work practices needed to perform the job? • Assure their employees are instructed in the known potential fire, explosion, or toxic release hazards related to the job and the applicable provisions of the emergency action plan? • Document the required training and the means to verify their employees have understood the training? • Assure their employees follow the facility safety rules and work practices? • Advise the employer of unique hazards presented by the contractor's work? 7. Does the employer maintain a contract employee injury and 5189(h) illness log related to the contractor's .work in process (7) areas? Records Review - Contractor's Programs 5189(h) (3) B. Are all contractor employees trained in the work practices necessary to perform their jobs safely? 5189 (h) 6ONTRACTORS 9_ Is each contract employee instructed in the known 5189(h) potential fire, explosion, or toxic release hazards related (1) to his/her job and the processes and applicable provisions of the emergency action plan? 10. Is there documentation that each contract employee has 5189(h) received and understands the required training? (4) 11. Do the contract employee training records contain the 5189(h) following: (4) • The identity of the employee? • 'The date of the training? • The means used to verify that the training was understood? - r 5189 (h) CONTRACTORS 12. Are there means to assure that contract employee follow 5189(h) the safety rules of the facility, including safe work (3) practices required.in 5189 (f) (4) ? (Review evidence of enforcement by the contractor. ) 13. Is the employer advised of any unique hazards presented 5189(h) by the contract employer's work or any hazards found by the (3) contract employer's work? B. On-site Conditions 5189(h) {2) 1. Based on a representative sample of observations of contractor employees, has the employer's program to control their entrance, presence, and exit been implemented? 5189 (h) CONTRACTORS 2_ Based on a representative sample of observations of 5189(h) contractor employees, do they follow the safety rules of the• (3) facility? (These rules include the employer's safe work practices such as lockout/tagout, confined space entry, and opening process equipment or piping; they may also include other rules such as excavation procedures or use of PPE.) C. Interviews 5189(h) (1) 1. Based on interviews with contractor employers, have they been informed of the known fire, explosion, or toxic release hazards related to their work and the processes in which they are involved? 2. Based on interviews with contractor employers, have they 5189(h) been informed of the applicable provisions of the employer's (2) emergency action plan? 5189 (h) CONTRACTORS 3. Based on interviews with contractor employers and5189(h) employees, have work practices to control their entrance, (1) presence, and exit of covered process areas been implemented? 4. Based on interviews with the. contractor empl4oyer, has the 5189(6) employer evaluated the contractor's performance in fulfilling the obligations required in 5189(h) (3)? I S. Based on interviews with a representative number of 5189(h) contractor employees, are they being in the known (4) potential fire, explosioin, or toxic -relax>se hazards related to their work and the processes in which :hey are involved? 5189 (h) CONTRACTORS 6. Based on interviews with a representative number of 5189(h) contractor employees, have they been instructed in the (2) applicable provisions of the emergency action plan? (Ask them to explain the plan and evacuation procedures.) 7_ Based on interviews with a representative number of 5189(h) contractor employees, has the contract employer assured that (3) they follow the safety rules of the facility? (Ask how safe work practices, entry restrictions for the facility, and use of required PPE are enforced.) FINAL DRAFT August 28, 1995 Attachment E Review of Oversight of Contractors FINAL DRAFT August 28, 1995 • Review of Oversight of Contractors: Question Response 1. On what frequency are the activities of contractors monitored? 2. Who monitors the contractors activities? q 3. How does the facility assure that contractors employees follow the specified job specific procedures? FINAL DRAFT August 28, 1995 Attachment F Review of Quality Assurance Program and Review of Preventive and Predictive Maintenance Program 5189 (j ) : MECHANICAL INTEGRITY I. PROGRAM SUMMARY The intent of this section is to assure that equipment used to process, store, or handle highly hazardous chemical is designed, constructed, installed, and maintained to minimize the risk of releases of such chemicals. This requires that a mechanical integrity program be in place to assure the continued integrity of process equipment. The elements of a mechanical integrity ' program include the identification and categorization of equipment and instrumentation, development of written maintenance procedures, training for process maintenance activities, inspection and testing, correction of deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits defined by the process safety information, and development of a quality assurance program. II. QUALITY CRITERIA REFERENCES A. 5189(j) : Mechanical Integrity 111. VERIFICATION OF PROGRAM ELEMENTS Criteria met Reference Y/K A. Records Review 1. Does the written mechanical integrity program include? 5189(j) • Pressure vessels and storage tanks (1) (A) • Piping systems and components such as valves • Relief and vent systems and devices 0 Emergency shutdown systems • controls (including monitoring devices and sensors, alarms and interlocks) • Pumps & compressors • Heat exchangers 2. Are there written procedures to maintain the on-going 5189(j) integrity of process equipment? Does the documentation (1) (A) indicate the procedures have been implemented? 5189 (j ) : MECHANICAL INTEGRITY 3. Has training been provided to each employee involved 5189(g) in maintaining the on-going integrity of process equipment (3) in the following: • An overview of the process and its hazards? • Procedures applicable to the employee's job tasks to assure that the employee can perform the job tasks in a safe manner? (Review certification documents for employees doing non- destructive tests, welding on pressure vessels, etc. , where these certifications are required_) 4. Are inspections and tests performed on each item of 5189(j) process equipment included in the program? (2) (A) S. Do inspection and testing procedures follow good 5189(j) engineering practices? (2) (B) 5189 (j ) : VLj;cHANICAL INTEGRITY 6. Are inspection n and test frequencies consistent with 5189(j) the manufacturer's recommendation and good engineering (2) (C) practice? Are inspections and tests performed more frequently if determined necessary by operating history? 7. Is there documentation of each inspection and test 5189(2) that has been performed including all of the following: (D) • Date of the inspection or test? • Name of person performing the procedure? • Serial number or other identifier of equipment on which procedure was performed? 0 Description of inspection or test performed? 0 Results of inspection or test? S. Are deficiencies in equipment that are outside limits 5189(j) (as defined in process safety. information) corrected (3) before further use or in a safe and timely manner when necessary means are taken to assure safe operation? 5189 (j ) : MECHANICAL INTEGRITY 9. In the construction of new plants and equipment, does 5189(j) the employer assure that equipment as it is fabricated is (4) (A) suitable for the process for which it will be used? 10. Have appropriate checks and inspections been made to 5189(j) assure equipment is installed properly and consistent with (4) (B) design specifications and manufacturer's instructions? (Include contractor supplied equipment.) 11, Does the employer assure that maintenance materials, 5189(j) spare parts, and equipment are suitable for the process (4) (c) application for which they are used? (Include contractor supplied equipment.) 5189 (j ) : MECHANICAL INTEGRITY B. On-site Conditions 1. Do observations of a representative sample of process 5189 (j) equipment indicate deficiencies outside acceptable limits? (3) (Compare process safety information criteria with the conditions of the equipment found in the process.) 2. If new plants or equipment are being constructed, do 5189(j) observations indicate that the equipment as it is (4) (B) fabricated is suitable for the process application? 3. Do observations of a representative sample of 5189(j) maintenance materials; -spare*parts, and equipment indicate (4) (c) that they are suitable for the process application for which they will be used? 5189 (j ) MECHANICAL INTEGRITY C. Interviews 5189 (j) Engineers (if any; or other qualified persons capable of (1) (A) providing the information requested; 1. Based on interviews with a representative number of engineers, have procedures to maintain the on-going integrity of the process equipment been implemented for: • Pressure vessels and storage tanks? • Piping systems and components such as valves? • Relief and vent systems and devices? • Emergency shutdown systems? • Controls (including monitoring devices and sensors, alarms and interlocks) ? • Pumps? (Ask about the possibility of safety critical equipment being inadvertently rendered inoperative. For example, a relief device might be ,isolated by closing an upstream valve. ) 2. Based on. interviews with a representative number of '5189(j) engineers, do the inspection and testing procedures follow (4) (B) recognized and generally accepted good engineering & practice? Has prior operating experience indicated a need (2) (C) for a more frequent test and inspection schedule than has been implemented? 5189 (j ) : MECHANICAL INTEGRITY 3. Based on interviews with a representative number of 5189(j) engineers, are equipment deficiencies corrected before use (3) when they are owe side the acceptable limits? If not, are the deficienc-'as corrected in a timely manner and are necessary means taken to assure safe operation? 4. Based on interviews with a representative number of engineers, has the employer assured that, for new plants 5189(j) and equipment, the equipment as it 'is fibricated is (4) (B) suitable for the process application? Are appropriate & (C) checks and inspections made to assure equipment is installed properly and consistent with design specifications and manufacturer's instructions? Are maintenance materials, spare parts, and equipment suitable for the process application for which they will be used? (Ask about contractor supplied items.) Maintenance: S. Based on interviewn with a representative number of 5189,(j) maintenance employees, have the written procedures for (i) (A) maintaining the on-going integrity of process equipment been implemented? t 5189 (j ) : MECHANICAL INTEGRITY 6. Based on interviews with a representative number of 5189 (8) employees involved in maintaining the on-going integrity (3) of the process, have they been trained to assure they can perform their tasks in a safe manner? Did the training include an overview of the process, its hazards, and procedures applicable to the job? (Determine if certification, specialized training, or unique qualifications are required.) 7. Based on interviews with a representative number of 5189(j) maintenance employees, do test and inspection procedures (2) (C) follow recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices? Is the frequency of inspections and tests consistent with applicable manufacturer's recommendations and good engineering practices? Are more frequent inspections and tests necessary due as indicated by prior operating experience? 5189 (j ) : .ML°sM"4 ANICAL INTEGRITY F 8. Based on interviews with a representative number of 5189(j) maintenance employ:; eo, are equipment deficiencies that are (3) outside acceptatle limits corrected before further use? If not,, are cor:ecrlons made in a timely manner and are necessary means t:a n to assure operation? 9. Based on interviews with a representative number of 5189(j) maintenance employees, are maintenance materials, spare (4) (B) parts and equipment suitable for the process application & (C) for which they are intended? (Ask about availability and use of substitw• .tes.) FINAL DRAFT August 28, 1995 Attachment G Review of Management of Change 5189 (1) : MANAGEMENT OF CHANGE I. PROGRAM SUMMARY The intent of this section is to require, management of all modifications to equipment, procedures, raw materials and processing conditions other than "replacement in kind" by identifying and reviewing them prior to implementation of the change. Minimum requirements for management of change include: establishing written - procedures to manage change; addressing the technical basis, impact on safety and health, modification to operating procedures, necessary time period, and authorizations required; informing and training employees affected; and updating process safety information and operating procedures or practices_ II. QUALITY CRITERIA REFERENCES A. 51e9 (1) : Management of Change Criteria Met 111. VERIFICATION OF PROGRAM ELEMENTS Reference A. Records Review 5189(l) (1) I. Are there written procedures for managing changes (except for "replacements in kind") to process. chemicals, technology, equipment, and procedures and changes to facilities that affect a covered process? (Review procedures that address responsibilities, steps for assessing risks and approving changes, requirements for reviewing designs for temporary and permanent changes, steps needed to verify that modifications have been made as designed, -variance procedures, time limit authorizations for temperary changes, and steps required to return the process to status quo after temporary changes.) 2. Do the procedures assure that the technical basis for 5189(1) the proposed change is addressed prior to any change? (2) (A) 5189(1) (2) (A) 5189 (1) : MANAGE tNT OF CHANGE 3. Do the procedures assure that the impact of the change 5189 (1) on safety and health is addressed prior to any change? (2) (B) 4. Do the procedures assure that modifications to 5189 (1). operating procedures is addressed prior to any change? (2) (C). S. Do the procedures assure that the necessary time period 5189(1) for the change is addressed prior to any change? (2) (D) 5189 (1) : MANAGEMENT OF CETMGE 6. Do the p.a;r_�cYedures asw.; -e that the authorization 5189(1) requirements for ;Zhe proposed change are addressed prior to (2) (E) any change? 7. Are employees involved in operating a pr. -i%ss, and maintenance and contract employees whose job ta:0,.: ,.ill be 5189(l) affected by change informed of, and trained in, the change (3) prior tc :=tart-up of process or affected part of process? 8- Is the.process safety information required by paragraph (d) updated if changed? S189(1) (4) 5189 (1) : MANAGEMENT OF CHANGE 9. Are the operating procedures or practices required by 5189(1) paragraph (f) updated if changed? (5) B. On-site Conditions 5189(1) (1} 1. Do observations of new or recently modified process chemicals, technology, equipment, or procedures (except "replacement in kind") indicate that the Management of Change procedures have been implemented? (Determine if records are available to support the procedures for new or revised processes found in the facility.) . 5189 (1) : MANAGEMENT OF CHANGE C. Interviews Operators, Maintenance, and Contractor Employees: 89 (l) 1. Based on interviews with operators, maintenance 51(1) employees and contractor employees, are procedures implemented to manage changes to existing process chemicals, technology, equipment, facilities, and procedures? 2. Based on interviews with operators, maintenance 5189(1) employees and contractor employees, is 'training in process (3) changes provided to employees whose job tasks will be affected by the changes prior to start-up? FINAL DRAFT August 28, 1995 Attachment H Review and Evaluation of Loss Control Management FINAL DRAFT August 28, 1995 Loss Control Management Review the policies, programs, and procedures and evaluate their implementation .for the elements listed below for the Unocal San Francisco Refinery. Leadership and Personal Group Administration Communications Communications General Policy Training in Personal Group Loss Control Communication Meetings Techniques Safety and Health/Loss Job Orientation/ Record-Keeping Control Coordinator Induction Senior and Middle Task Instruction Management Management Involvement Participation Established Loss Planned Personal Control Performance Contacts Standards Participation in Loss Control Activities Management Meetings Loss Control Reference Manual Internal Audits Conducted Individual Responsibility for Loss Control Establishment of Annual Loss Control Objectives FINAL DRAFT August 28, 1995 Leadership and Personal Group Administration Communications Communications Joint Safety, Health, and Environmental Committees and/or Safety and Health Representatives Refusal to Work Due to Loss Control Hazards Reference Library Document Control Regulations, Codes, and Standards External Communications • FINAL DRAFT August 28, 1995 Attachment I Unocal Catacarb Corrective Action Plan CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN SUMMARY 1. Auditing A. Independent Auditor to review Unocal's notification procedures, emergency . response plan and safety management program B. Audit notification procedures to emergency response staff, employees, agencies, and community 2. Training A. "Lessons Learned" Training Incorporate details of Catacarb incident in annual OSHA training to prevent recurrence B. Management of Change Training with emphasis on unusual circumstance C. Compliance Alert Training D. Risk Communication Training E. Emergency Response Plan Training 3. Driflis A. Notification procedures B. Emergency response plan C. Health Care Provider notification procedures 4. Communications Several communications channels will be used to reinforce message of commitment to safety and compliance A. Messages from Upper Management via presentations B. Articles in Employee Newsletter C. Messages from the Manager via memo 5. Management oversight/decision-making A. Increase technical staff input and cross-fuil6tionil decision team' s for unusual and hd emergency operations B. Increase management in the field C. Improve handling of community calls 6. Enhanced Information Access A. Update MSDS handling B. Update crisis communications policy C. Create health care provider notification plan D, Community Advisory Panel December 2, 1994 Page 1 CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN DETAIL Action , Date. Description 1. Auditing 3/95 A. Independent Auditor Unocal will, at company expense, hire an independent auditor, selected by the community and mutually agreeable to Unocal, who will perform an independent audit of the facility's notification procedures, emergency response plan, and safety management program. The results of the audit would be made public, and Unocal is committed to responding to any concems raised by the report. B. Internal Audit A team has been pulled together to improve Unocal's notification procedures, which includes how the refinery notifies and communicates with emergency response staff, employees, agencies, and community. com- Intemally, these include revising our procedures for activating plete emergency personnel and ordering new communications equipment. com- In the community, these mean identifying those which need plete most carefully looking after, such as schools, day care centers and senior citizen centers and improving our ability to communicate with them quickly and clearly. The audit will also, review timeliness of agency notification. (The-initial audit has wqencompleted and some of the recommendations have already been, put in place) 2. Training .1/95 A. . "Lessons Learned" Training Incorporate details of Catacarb incident in annual OSHA training to all employees to prevent recurrence 3/95 B. Management of Change Training Review formal training of personnel who participate in Management of Change programs with emphasis on application of the Management of Change to unique or unusua situations. Review Management of Change procedure to address and reinforce inclusion of non-engineered changes in la process, operating equipment, and procedures. December 2, 1994 Page 2 Action Date Description 2. Training (Cont) 1/95 C. Compliance Alert Training Perform training to all employees during monthly safety meetings on the corporate compliance alert program. Training will include a description of compliance guidelines and standards, a description of the toll-free telephone number for compliance reporting, and distribution of a wallet-size card for reference. 1195 D. Risk Communication Training Perform risk communication training to enhance management and staffs ability to communicate clear consistent message concerning potential health safety and environmental risks posed by operations. 2/95 E. Emergency Response Plan Training Perform training on the emergency response plan after it has been reviewed and updated, including evaluating criteria for calling an emergency "Under Control" and "All Clear", as well as agency and community notification procedures. Training will focus on Management and Staff, and be-incorporated into the all employee annual OSHA training. 3. Drill 1/95 A. Notification procedure Perform table top drills after notification procedures have been reviewed and updated to include: agency notification, community notification and-employee notification. 5/95 B. Emergency response plan Perform:drill of Emergency response plan'. Invitation to observe/participate in the drill will be extended to CAP members, and local fire departments. 4/95 C. Physician notification plan Perform drill of physician notification plan. Invitation to observelparticipate'in the drill will be extended to recipient physicians, CAP members, and local fire departments. N=6 r December 2, 1994 Page 3 Action Date Description 4. Communications Examine and take steps to improve communications within the Refinery. Several communications channels will be used to reinforce message of commitment to safety and compliance. A. Messages from Upper Management via Presentations 12/94 - President, 76 Products, addresses all supervisors 2/95 • Vice President of Refining, 76 Products, addresses all supervisors 5/95 - Vice President HES, Unocal, describes new corporate compliance program to all supervisors 8/95 - General Counsel, 76 Products, addresses all supervisors 11/95 - Chief Compliance Officer, Unocal, addresses all supervisors B. Articles in Employee Newsletter Including: on- ■ compliance alert 800 number going ■ interviews with health, safety, emergency response and environmental affairs personnel ■ description and examples of Management of Change process on- C. Messages from the Manager going Memos to employees, emphasizing commitment to compliance, updating on 'interaction with community December 2, 1994, Page 4 Action Date Description 5. Management 1/95 A. Include technical staff input in cross-functional oversight/ decision teams for unusual and emergency operations Decision making Review roles for specialized departments (i.e. Environmental Affairs, Health Safety and Emergency Response, Metallurgical Engineering and Inspection, Process Engineering, Engineering Design and Construction and Law Department) in the decision making process. Review and formalize methodology for management decisions related to unusual and emergency operating situations with the goal of enhancing cross-functional iteam work and decisions. 12/94 B. increase management in the field Increase Managements and staff group's field presence in order to improve face to face communications. Include field visits in key performance indicators (KPI). 1/95 C. Handling community complaints Review and improve handling of community complaints, e.g. establish specific guidelines for response and incorporate them in the-existing procedure. Complaint routing should be reviewed and updated to assure that the appropriate responsible departments (Environmental Affairs, Health Safety Emergency Response, etc.) are promptly apprised of the situation and respond. Refinery manager will be given copies of community complaints on an ongoing basis. CAP members will review complaints at CAP meetings.. Complaints will be I Isummarized for Vice-President of Refining rionthly- December 2, 1994 Page 5 Action Date Description 6. Enhanced 2/95 A. Update MSDS handling Information Access An improved method will be developed to make MSDS quickly available to the public. Review current procedures for obtaining and reviewing Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) for new or modified chemicals and new and intermediate products. Procedures should include time limits for MSDS development, review, and availability to employees. The procedure should be consistent with the Unocal Corporate Product Safety and Toxicology Group procedure. 3/95 B. . Update crisis communications plan Review and enhance current crisis communications plan to incorporate new relationships established with community members and media as a result of the Community Advisory Panel, Good Neighbor Agreement meetings and 76 Products Public Relations Plan. Specific examples include: ■ establish a list of "key community contacts" to be noted in the event of an emergency ■ timely notification of CAP members, incorporating CAP members in organization and dissemination of information to community after an incident ■ acquaint local media with incident command system C. Create health care providers notification pian Develop a pian to notify local health care providers (physicians clinics, emergency rooms, pharmacists, emergency response personnel, etc.) in the event of.a release. .Notifrcatibn will include a brief summary of toxicological properties, recommended diagnostic tests and treatment, and a contact number for Unocal physicians and toxicologists. Action steps will include: 12/94 ■ Designate list of potential local health care providers (physicians, pharmacists, etc.) 1/95 ■ Hold focus group of potential recipients to review sample format and content 2/95 ■ Develop list of potential hazards to be included in program 3195 ■ Computer/fax broadcast set up 3195 ■ Develop policy for activation, incorporate into the incident command system procedures and training 4/95 ■ Input data into program 6/95 is Prepare program/data to be shared with other facilities December 2, 1994 Page 6 Action Date Description 6. Enhanced C. Community Advisory Panel Information Access has A community advisory panel (CAP) will be established to (Cont) been promote long-term communications, cooperation and working initi- relationships between Unocal and its neighbors in Crockett, ated Rodeo and Tormey. on- The CAP will identify and work to resolve issues of concern to going the community and Unocal. As an introduction to the refinery, Unocal will provide CAP members with an orientation and training on refinery operations, health, environment and safety procedures, company policies and procedures-including a tour. FINAL DRAFT -August 28, 1995 Attachment J Compliance Exceptions and Recommendations 9 ° dw Hca try N � � 0 0 Ow R i6 N id d s�N N s 5 d 0 3 U- 7� W � ? o N0 d y aj N .r � W fs. 0 v N i6 O tZ� d dZ Attachment# 2 UNOCAL SAFETY AUDIT PUBLIC COMMENTS OUTLINE I. Request for public comments (four weeks) A. Mail to interested parties B. Comment Period Thirty Days - August 29, 1995 to September 29, 1995 II. Review public comments (two weeks) A. Review all comments B. Include appropriate comments in Scope of Work III. Answer comments (one week) Respond to all written comments in writing 1 . Indicate whether and where comments were incorporated into the Scope of Work. 2. If comments were not incorporated, discuss reasoning for not incorporating comments. IV. Review comments and answers with interested parties (e.g. CAP, Audit Committee, any other interested community group or members, interested agencies, Unocal employees and unions) (one week). ATTACHMENT $ 3 2 mak, » coR. In cu ■ /$ z cm § § e § 2 � s w © o . U. 2 w 0 § § © k co e ir cm � m m § « ui ) w ■ z ui ° U ( D § � � > w « ) ° k \ > 0 In W R 2 () 7 LU LLJ § U cc � R ? Wco @ © § / � � w J � o a cc wLLJ m o co k . LU UJ $\ \( ■ k / 2< ) f � § R � 2 ¥ Lk �m ■k om �m � - oA �A k q 0 ° c R cc a. 2wmw0 k/ co (a R §R2B0 cc Ir 0*� �� 0 I § w ® g000M �o �§� �w@ am « [ � o�0IL � R � zzMz w2 0 0 ■ -�-1u moeo� ��° 020000 « o ■ zz zw z�zD -n-o & £3 � www � Poo �[ �p o ¥� g� �� ma. m � w <w- woo � ��eLU U.o w < e oo > R ��u=� CL#� o � oez _�Re � w2° = zi « 09 50�® �� �� � 0000�oou ewe uo w 000@° o� �§� w �o� �m �� o2 �� � § < cc - —i< ip -in � uF,� ILU �0u � � -i- uGPu , �PP � o �ow o#� <« � o « «m « « R« « 05050« «« gw== u>zzoo «oo oCCozzoLUCCz� acz � wWWWwWzzo � �on �Woo -Jzzuz ecoE� uzaEao � ooE � �� �� oEEoD �o � � w000DE� « J ATTACHMENT # 4 LL Ion S ,oz Z J W = 0 0 U� O W m t �y O Q a ppZt � 00¢ t O 13 Y¢Q Za �a5 rb yO�YY 6¢ O 3 S tu-8 o 0 e� CO m0 W nr;W m = Z W 0 Q 01 LL J ¢ W D CU o 7J S FROM UNOCAL SFA REFINERY (FRI) 09. 01' 95 16:08/S' ATTACHMENT # 5 UNOCAL CAP MEMBERS -- -- - - HOWARD ADA.N4S MELVIN EOYD LYNN CHERRY JERRY LUTLETON JOHARA NDUR DONALD ZANTA STEVE BATCHELDER BUD BURLISON MIKE ERIKSON PETER MILCOVICD BILL RJDLE JESSE BATCHELDER JANET CALLAGHAN JAY GUNK.ELMA,N NORA MILER DENNIS SALMI ,FROM UNOCAL SFA REFINERY (FRI) 09. 01' 95 10:08157 ATTACHMENT# 5 AUDIT COMMITTEE -- - Joe Chacko (510)245-4454 (w) Unocal Management Mark Moberg (707)864-1673 (h) Unocal Non-management Dave Sparks (707)446-2542 (h) SFR OCAW Buts Burlison (510)787-3477 (h) CAP Jay Gunklemen (510)787-1216 Crockett/Rodeo Coalition (415)924-3384 (w) Karen Hall (510)799-1703 (h) Crockett/Rodeo Coalition Andy Mec Kling (510)787-1641 (h) Shoreline Environmental Alliance Denny Larson (415)243-8373 (w) Citizens for a Better Environment reYrBed .eY95 free IfstaG i C ATTACHMENT# 6 Crockett Improvement Association Jay Gunkleman Kasha Kessler P.O. Box 132 Good Neighbor Audit Committee Shoreline Environmental Alliance Crockett, CA 94525 422 Jackson Street 565 Clark Street Crockett, CA 94525 Crockett, CA 94525 Lynn Cherry Leonard Miglio George Bendix Crockett/Rodeo Coalition President, Rodeo Citizens Chairman, Rodeo Municipal 936 Elm Drive Association Advisory Council Rodeo, CA 94572 873 4th Street 516 First Street Rodeo, CA 94572 Rodeo, CA 94572 Karen Hall Bud Burlison Lauren Wixson Good Neighbor Audit Committee & Good Neighbor Audit Committee Deputy District Attorney for Contra Crockett/Rodeo Coalition 364 Edwards Street Costa County 1130 Langlie Court Crockett, CA 94525 651 Pine Street Rodeo, CA 94572 Martinez, CA 94553 Milton Feldstein Janet Callaghan Joe Chacko Bay Area Air Quality Management John Swett Unified School District Good Neighbor Audit Committee District 914 Sandy Cove Drive 1380 San Pablo Avenue 939 Ellis Street Rodeo, CA 94572 Rodeo, CA 94572 San Francisco, CA 94109 Mark Moberg Alicia Anderson Ruth Blakeney Good Neighbor Audit Committee Crockett/Rodeo Coalition Shoreline Environmental Alliance 1380 San Pablo Avenue, Unit 240 3726 Mt. Diablo Boulevard #215 P.O. Box 214 Rodeo, CA 94572 Lafayette, CA 94549 Crockett, CA 94526 Denny Larson Andy Mechling Dave Sparks Citizens for a Better Environment Shoreline Environmental Alliance& Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers 500 Howard Street #506 Good Neighbor Audit Committee Union Local 1 San Francisco, CA 94105 902 St. Andrews 432 First Street El Sobrante, CA 94803 Rodeo, CA 94572 Wayne Tierney-Superintendant Jim Delgadillo Ron Holloway John Swett Unified School District JSUSD Governing Board Members International Representative 341 B Street 341 B Street OCAW Crockett, CA 94525 Crockett, CA 94525 P.O. Box 349 Martinez, CA 94553 Mike Menesini James J. Sweeny Joyce Hawkins Mayor, City of Martinez Mayor, City of Moraga Mayor, City of Orinda 1320 Thomas Street 296 Birchwood Drive 43 Tappan Lane Martinez, CA 94553 Moraga, CA 94556 Orinda, CA 94563 Peter Murray Rosemary Corbin Barbara Vigil Mayor, City of Pinole Mayor, City of Richmond Mayor, City of San Pablo 2100 Whipporwill Court 114 Crest Avenue 1918 15th Street Pinole, CA 94564 Richmond, CA 94804 San Pablo, CA 94806 Norman LaForce Beth Bartke Eduardo Manuel Mayor, City of El Cerrito Mayor, City of Hercules City Council Member 802 Balra Drive 274 Falcon Way 175 Iris Road El Cerrito, CA 94530 Hercules, CA 94547 Hercules, CA 94547 Darrel "Jay" Tucker Gayle Ullkema Terry Segerberg Mayor Pro Tem, City of Hercules Mayor, City of Lafayette City Council Member 1559 Partride 670 Sky Hy Circle 2250 Redwood Hercules, CA 94547 Lafayette, CA 94549 Hercules, CA 94547 Lloyd Wagstaff Pedro Jiminez-Chief Joseph H. Beck City Council Member Rodeo/Hercules Fire District Rodeo/Hercules Fire District 118 Skelly 1680 Refugio Valley Rd. 1680 Refugio Valley Rd. Hercules, CA 94547 Hercules, CA 94547 Hercules, CA 94547 Dennis Barry & Harvey Bragdon Henry Clark Elinor Blake Community Development 1019 MacDonald Avenue 20 Allen Street 651 Pine Street Richmond, CA 94801 Martinez, CA 94553 Martinez, CA 94553 Steve Batchelder Dennis Salmi Mike Erickson 1534 Rose Street 901 Elm Drive 122 3rd Street Crockett, CA 94525 Rodeo, CA 94572 Rodeo, CA 94572 Peter Milcovich Bill Ridle Jesse Batchelder 259 Duperu Drive 526 1st Street 1534 Rose Street Crockett, CA 94525 Rodeo, CA 94572 Crockett, CA 94525 Melvin Boyd Howard Adams Jerry Littleton 1119 Dennis Court 720 Kendall Avenue 33 Standish Court Rodeo, CA 94572-1928 Crockett, CA 94525 Crockett, CA 94525 Rick Kreutzer, M.D.,Chief Jim Cone, M.D. Melanie Marty, PhD Michael Armstrong, Sandy McNeel,DVM COHP/DHS Jim Collins, PhD EHIB/DHS 2151 Berkeley Way, Annex 11 ATES/OEHHA 5900 Hollis Street, Ste. E Berkeley, CA 94704 2151 Berkeley Way, Annex 11 Emeryville, CA 94608 Berkeley, CA 94704 Supervisor Jim Rogers Supervisor Jeff Smith Supervisor Gayle Bishop 100 37th Street, Rm. 270 651 Pine Street, Rm. 108A 18 Crow Canyon Court, Suite #120 Richmond, CA 94805 Martinez, CA 94553 San Ramon, CA 94583 Supervisor Mark DeSaulnier Supervisor Tom Torlakson John Caynak 2425 Bisso Lane, Suite 110 300 E Leland Avenue, Suite 100 Cal-OSHA Concord, CA 94520 Pittsburg, CA 94565 1465 Enea Circle, Bldg. E, Ste.900 Concord, CA 94520-5211 Hon. George Miller Senator Dan Boatwright Assemblyman Bob Campbell Attn: Cathy Hoffman 1001 Galaxy Way #210 604 Ferry Street, Suite #220 367 Civic Drive Concord, CA 94520 Martinez, CA 94553 Pleasant Hill, CA 94523 ATTACHMENT # 7 ` Contra Costa Council Central Labor Council Sea Land Service, Inc. 1 Annabel Lane Suite 214 of Contra Costa County P.O. Box 24025 San Ramon, CA 94583 525 Green St. Oakland, CA 94623 P.O. Box 389 Martinez, CA 94553 The Industrial Association Construction & Building Building Industry Association P.O. Box 23806 Trades Council P.O. Box 5160 Pleasant Hill, CA 94523 935 Alhambra Ave. San Ramon, CA 94583 Martinez, CA 94553 Coalition of Labor and Business Dennis Spaniol Steve Roberti (COLAB) Council of Industries Contra Costa County Central Labor 1030 Shary Court, Room 202 P.O. Box 5189 Council Concord, CA 94518 Hercules, CA 94547 P.O. 389 Martinez, CA 94553 Greg Foore Gary Yancey Bud Lake Chief Executive Officer District Attorney for Contra Costa Council 2727 Alhambra Avenue Contra Costa County 2694 Bishop Drive Suite 121 Martinez, CA 94553 725 Court Street San Ramon, CA 94583 Martinez, CA 94553 Guy Bjerke Coalition of Labor and Business Barbara Woodburn Building Industries Association 1030 Shary Court, Suite B City Council Member P.O. Box 5160 Concord, CA 94518 621 Brackman Lane San Ramon, CA 94583 Martinez, CA 94553 Harriett Burt Timothy Farley Julian Frazer Vice Mayor, City of Martinez City Council Member City Council Member 835 Robinson Street 334 Orchard View Avenue 2415 Alhambra Avenue Martinez, CA 94553 Martinez, CA 94553 Martinez, CA 94553 Cherie T. Grant Michael Harris Gregg Wheatland City Council Member Vice Mayor, City of Moraga Mayor, Pro Tem, City of Orinda 93 David Drive P.O. Box 188 6 Dover Court Moraga, CA 94556 Moraga, CA 94556 Orinda, CA 94563 Maria Alegria Mary Horton Lonnie Washingon Jr. Mayor Pro Tem, City of Pinole City Council Member City Council Member 3781 Pear Street 2988 Hiquera Avenue 345 So. 25th Street Pinole, CA 94564 Pinole, CA 94564 Richmond, CA 94804 Richard L. Griffin James McMillan Donna Powers City Council Member City Council Member City Council Member 616 South 49th Street 1362 Santa Clara Street P.O. Box 415 Richmond, CA. 94804 Richmond, CA 94804 Richmond, CA 94807 LaVonne Niccolls Joseph Gomes Shirley Wysinger City Council Member City Council Member City Council Member 531 Carlson Street 1928 California Avenue 2593-C El Portal Richmond, CA 94804 San Pablo, CA 94806 San Pablo, CA 94506 r Sharon Brown W. Mae Ritz Jane Burke Vice Mayor, City of San Pablo City Council Member City Council Member 919 Road 20 1215 Contra Costa Drive 1315 Devonshire Court San Pablo, CA 94806 El Cerrito, CA 94530 El Cerrito, CA 94530 Cathie Kosel Norma Jellison Anne Grodin Vice Mayor, City of El Cerrito City Council Member City Council Member 220 Pomona Avenue 6816 Blake Street 2 Mountain View Lane El Cerrito, CA 94530 El Cerrito, CA 94530 Lafayette, CA 94549 Ivor Samson Don Tatzin Judy Garvens Vice Mayor, City of Lafayette City Council Member City Council Member 1133 Garden Lane 1114 Orchard Road 682 Old Jones Hill Road Lafayette, CA 94549 Lafayette, CA 94549 Lafayette, CA 94549 John Marquez Irma Anderson Johnny Palmer City Council Member City Council Member City Council Member 5061 Buckboard Way 5016 Nunn Street 2221 Pine Avenue Richmond, CA 94804 Richmond, CA 94804 San Pablo, CA 94806 Michael Majchizak Frank Sperling Laura Abrams City Council.Member City Council Member City Council Member 606 Rheem Drive 397 Tharp Drive 14 La Bolsita Way Moraga, CA 94556 Moraga, CA 94556 Orinda, CA 94563 Sargent Littlehale Alan Tabor Betty Boyle City Council Member City Council Member City Council Member 4 Carolyn Court 19 Candlestick Road 2634 Doidge Avenue Orinda, CA 94563 Orinda, CA 94563 Pinole, CA 94564 Phil Bradshaw Sabiha Gocken Tom Lindemuth City Council Member 2047 Olympic Drive 434 Bridge Road 730 San Pablo Avenue, Bldg. 6. Sp.l l Martinez, CA 94553 Walnut Creek, CA 94595 Pinole, CA 94564 Paul De Falco Mike Shimansky Dick Hallford 117 Natalie Drive 510 La Gonda Way Tosco Moraga, CA 94556 Danville, CA 94526 Avon Refinery Martinez, CA 94553 Scott Anderson Industrial Associates P.O. Box 988 Martinez, CA 94553 a CCCHSD HAZMAT Fax:510-646-2073 Sep 5 Contra Costa Count .. ATTACHMENT# 8 Health Services Departme ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION HAZARDOUS MATERIALS/OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH PRIORITY CONFIRM: (510) 646-2286 X ROUTINE FAX: (510) 646-2073 CONFIRMT I ON REQUESTED TEL E C 0 F Y _. T R A N S M T T T A L COVER SHEET COMPANY: County Administrator FAX#: 6-4098 ATTN: Cjg3ade Van Marter FROM: Randy SpMer DATE: Smntember 5. 1995 TIME: 3:00 �m NUMaER OF PAGES (INCLUDING COVER SHEET) : 2 COMMENTS: This jp_ the press release that waka scent out to West County TijUes, Contra Costa Times, Bay Area News, Oakland Tribune, San Francisco Chronicle San Francisca 'Examinees nd Cflntra Costa TV. COVER.FAX 433 Pacheco Bouf&ard�■'Martinez;0a1d0M1a 94553 • (510)648-2286 CCCHSD HAZMAT Fax:510-646-2073 Sep 5 '95 15:05 P.02 e � September 5,1.95 FOR 1]MUKEDIATE RELEASE �4NTACT: Raxdy Sawyer (510)646-2286 PUBLIC COMNMNT SOUGRT ON UNOCAL REFINERY DRAFT SAFETY AUDIT The Contra Costa County Himith Services Department is seeking public cotz7mer t on a dram scope of work for an independent Safety Audit that will be conducted at the Unocal Refinery in Rodeo. The Board of Supervisors ordered a thorough,independent audit out of concern from recent incidents that have occurred at the refinery over the past year. The Safety Audit process,under the guidance of The Board of Supervisors,includes the opportunity for public comment on the scope of work for the Safety Audit as an integral part of the overall effort. Comments on the draft scope of work for the Safety Audit must be in writing and must be postmarked no later than.September 29, 1995. A copy of the draft is available from Contra Costa County Health Services Department (CCCHSD)by calling(510)646-2286. For additional information regarding the Unocal Safety Audit Process,please contact Randy Sawyer or Laura Brown at the CCCHSD,(5 10)646-2286. 915/95 CBD RECEIVED Petition of Support SEP 12 1g5 Retain Membership and Roles of Good 'Neighbor Audit Commi fee CLERK BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CONTRA COSTA CO. We,urge the Contra Costa Board of Supervisors to require that the existing audit committee of the Good Neighbor Agreement be kept in place to monitor the county's upcoming accident prevention audit of the Unocal refinery. Citizens for a Better Environment,has a spot on the Good Neighbor audit committee and has,played an essential role because of their expertise in making refineries cleaner and safer and because they have full time staff that,can' actually spend the time it takes to really monitor these'audits.. Therefore CBE. should retain its role to monitor the. upcoming county audit in the same manner as in the Good Neighbor Agreement. The OCAW Union, SEA and Crockett/Rodeo Colaition also have representatives on this committee and it simply must stay in place to ensure community support,for the next- audit. , Name (pleas ptRt) Address Phone to4 , Ca RECEIVED Petition of Support SEP 12'1995 Retain Membership and Roles. of Good Neighbor Audit Committee CLERK BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CONTRA COSTA CO. We urge the Contra Costa Board of Supervisors to .require that the existing. audit committee of the Good Neighbor Agreement be kept in place to monitor the county's upcoming accident,prevention audit of'the Unocal refinery. Citizens for a Better Environment has a spot on-the Good Neighbor audit committee and has played an essential.role because of their expertise in making refineries cleaner and safer and because'they have.full time staff that can actually spend the, time it takes to really monitor these audits. Therefore CBE should retain its. role to monitor the upcoming county audit in the same manner as in the Good Neighbor Agreement. The OCAW Union, SEA and-Crockett/Rodeo`Colaition also have representatives on this committee and it simply must stay in place to ensure community support for the next audit.; Name (please print) Address Phone 1I rl� F � P(DS4 sly eq Imo. � 5� • �L��ck � Som ,�o� � C1 � 1� � � RECEIVED Petition, of Support SEP 12 1995 Retain- Membership and Roles of Good, Neighbg1E&9 D(oQYJj; S CONTRA COSTA CO. We urge the Contra Costa Board of Supervisors to require.that-the existing audit committee of the Good Neighbor Agreement be kept inp lace to monitor the county's upcoming accident,prevention audit of the Unocal refinery. Citizens-for a Better Environment has a spot-on the Good Neighbor audit committee and has played an essential role, because of their expertise in making refineries cleaner and safer and because, they have full time staff. that can actually-spend the time it takes to really monitor these audits. Therefore-CBE should retain its role.to monitor,the upcoming county audit in - the same manner as in the Good 'Neighbor Agreement. The OCAW Union, -SEA and Crockett/Rodeo Colaition also.-have representatives on this committee and it simply must stay in place to ensure community support for the next audit. Name (please print) Address Phone I&L 142--)end-pi-Lw odd L24ead,fir`, '78 y- &Lt <�f4w q �D 7T?-3 i RECEIVE® Petition of ,Support SEP 12 1995 Retain -Membership and Roles of Good NeighborC E Pvdit. Committee K E3OARD OF SUPERVISORS CONTRA COSTA Co. We-urge the Contra Costa Board of Supervisors to require that the existing audit committee of the Good Neighbor Agreement be kept in place to monitor the county's upcoming accident prevention audit of the Unocal refinery. Citizens.for a Better Environment has a spot on the Good Neighbor , audit committee and has played an essential role because. of their expertise. in making refineries cleaner and`safer and because they have full time staff that can actually spend the time it takes to really monitor these audits. Therefore CBE should retain its role to monitor the upcoming county audit in, the same manner as in the'Good Neighbor Agreement. , The OCAW Union, SEA and Crockett/Rodeo Colaition also have representatives on this committee and it simply must stay in place to ensure community support for the next audit. Name (please print) Address Phone 1261 00/d de— 2-9,,c J)u vew u Dr 6k 4 (V RECEIVED Petition of support SEP 12 11 Retain Membership and Roles of Good Neighbor Audit Commi e.e CLERK BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CONTRA COSTA CO. Wef urge the Contra Costa Board of Supervisors to require that the existing audit committee of the Good Neighbor Agreement be kept in place to monitor the county's upcoming accident prevention audit of the Unocal refinery.- Citizens for a Better Environment has a spot on the Good Neighbor audit committee and has played an essential role because of their expertise in making refineries cleaner and safer and because they have full time staff that can actually spend the time it-,takes to really monitor these audits. Therefore CBE should retain its role,to monitor the upcoming county audit in the same manner as in the Good Neighbor Agreement. The OCAW Union, SEA and Crockett/Rodeo Colaition also have representatives on this, committee and it simply must stay in place to ensure community support for the next audit. Name (please print) Address Phone M 0e 1 Z33 SVckrC 5!-j c" X45 A M-15--N— G, z Kr+P knkm2o Fiona G ' A M G( a - (js y-2,=9373 � ��,,,�G-� � y o �- _� s� �5-�'I:e r o Y. s�c.�1 � �p� `�F►.S/Zc��� lbZs� sar,-Vlk lcl?65 J RECEIVE® Petition of Support SEP 12 1995 Retain Membership and Roles of Good Neighbor ALWIL(99901P RVISons CONTRA COSTA CO. We• urge-the Contra Costa Board of Supervisors to require that the, existing audit committee of the Good Neighbor Agreement be kept in place to monitor the county's upcoming accident prevention audit of the Unocal refinery. Citizens for a Better Environment has a spot on the Good Neighbor- audit committee and has played an essential role because of their expertise in.making refineries cleaner and safer and because they have full time staff that can actually spend the time it takes to really monitor these audits. Therefore CBE should retain its role'to,monitor the upcoming county audit in the same manner as.in the Good Neighbor Agreement. The OCAW Union, SEA and Crockett/Rodeo Colaition also have representatives on this committee and 'it simply must stay in, place to ensure community support for the next audit. Name easeprint) Address Phone I h71rit ES -- ' Petition "of support RECEIVE® Retain Membership and Roles of Good- Neighbor Audit Comm CLERK BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CONTRA COSTA CO. We urge the Contra Costa Board of Supervisors to require that the existing audit committee" of the"Good Neighbor Agreement be kept in place to monitor the county's upcoming accident prevention audit of the Unocal refinery. Citizens for a Better Environment has a spot on the Good Neighbor audit committee and has played an essential rolebecause of their expertise in making refineries cleaner and safer and because they have full-time staff. that can actually spend the time it takes to really monitor these audits. Therefore CBE should retain its role to monitor the upcoming county audit in the same manner as in the Good Neighbor Agreement. The OCAW:Union, SEA"and Crockett/Rodeo Colaition also have representatives on-this committee and it simply must stay in place to ensure community support for,, the next audit.' Name (please prink Address Phone Ae T RECEIVED Petition of :Support SEP 12 1995 Retain Membership and Roles of Good Neighbor ALWWOQ"tWaVISORS CONTRA COSTA CO. We-urge-.the Contra Costa Board of Supervisors to require that the existing audit committee of the Good Neighbor Agreement be kept in place to monitor the county's-upcoming accident prevention audit.of the Unocal_ refinery. Citizens for a Better Environment has a spot on the Good Neighbor audit committee and has played an essential role because of their expertise in making refineries cleaner and safer and because they have full time staff, that can actually spend the time it takes to really monitor these audits. Therefore CBEshould retain, its role to monitor the upcoming county audit in the same manner a"s in the Good Neighbor Agreement: The OCAW Union, SEA and Crockett/Rodeo Colaition also have representatives on this committee and it simply must stay in place to ensure community support for the next audit. Name (please print) Address Phone u4 wid Q�)Pff" f� Gd IaA4--9- ad 4 h r �2 �u �U ��-Z7j q �2 Petition of Support. SEP 12 1995 Retain Membership and Roles of Good Neighbor Audi!RA@AW%4 ,Isr,,Is CONTRA COSTA CO.. Wef urge the Contra Costa'Board of Supervisors to require,that the existing audit committee of the Good Neighbor Agreement be kept in place to monitor the county's upcoming" accident prevention audit of the Unocal refinery. Citizens for Better Environment has a spot on the Good Neighbor audit committee and has played an essential role because of their expertise in making refineries cleaner and safer and because they have full time staff -that can actually spend the time it takes to really monitor these audits. ..Therefore CBE should retain its role to,monitor the upcoming county audit Jn.. the same manner as in the Good Neighbor Agreement. . The OCAW Union, SEA and Crockett/Rodeo Colaition also have representatives on this committee and it simply must stay in place to ensure,community support for the next audit. Name (please print) Address 'Phone n a rri ve rf Lon'W Lori', Avg- Cr�o 7�-7 -77 �. /��% Za sZ oc' eii 7�s'7S<77 3� 5� l _ \ RECEIVED Petition of SupportSEP 12 1995 Retain .Membership and Roles of Good Neighbor APulk� F69FW9?iSgRA VISORS CGNTRA COSTA CO. ' Wa urge the Contra Costa Board of,Supervisors to require that the existing audit-committee of the Good Neighbor Agreement be kept in place to monitor the county's upcoming accident prevention audit of the Unocal refinery. Citizens for a Better Environment has .a spot on the Good Neighbor audit committee and has played an essential role because of their expertise in making refineries cleaner and safer and because they have,full time staff that can actually spend the time it takes to really monitor these audits. ,Therefore CBE should retain- role to monitor the upcoming county-audit in the same manner as in the Good Neighbor Agreement. The OCAW Union; SEA and Crockett/Rodeo Colaition also have representatives on, this committee and it simply, must stay in place. to ensure community support for the next audit. Name (please print) Address Phone f 76.-2- ooh CAe �� �,� 13 R- -2 �7 IA194 ftmA 'rfW-w )k J , ttjl � R -0-J) 0 799-14V ) Asia 7cr 12 33 �-� r� �� - ��c�1ce �K2s 7�7=15 Petition of Support RECEIVED Retain- Membership, and Roles of Good Neighbor Audit SEHrbit$0p CLERK BOARD OF SUPERVISORS We- urge the Contra Costa Board of Supervisors to require that RMWMIR Co. audit committee of the Good Neighbor Agreement be kept:in place to. monitor the county's upcoming accident prevention audit of the .Unocal - refinery. Citizens for a Better Environment has a spot on the Good Neighbor. ' audit committee and has played an essential role because of their expertise in making refineries cleaner and safer and because they have full time staff that can actually spend the time it takes to really monitor these audits. Therefore CBE should retain its role to monitor the upcoming county audit in the same manner as in the Good Neighbor Agreement. The OCAW Union, SEA and Crockett%Rodeo Colaition also have representatives on this committee and it simply must stay in place to ensure'community support for the next audit. Nam lease rint Address Phone V\S"- ry-C,6((,+ r - 7r = 3 L.9 WAP Fltb P VfS7A Tei i ��KLTr �?�l 19d o 2d C-V® C' 4v�e Petition of Support Retain Membership and Roles of Good Neighbor AudiP UP SEP 12 1995 . Wa urge the Contra Costa Board of Supervisors to require&gk SUAV,so s audit committee of the Good Neighbor Agreement be kept in pcosrA co. monitor the county's upcoming accident prevention audit of the Unocal refinery. Citizens for a Better Environment has a spot on the Good Neighbor audit committee and. has played an essential role because of their expertise in making refineries cleaner and safer and, because they have full time staff that can actually spend the time it takes to really monitor these audits. Therefore CBE should retain its role to monitor -the upcoming county,audit in the same manner as"in the Good Neighbor Agreement.� The OCAW Union, .SEA and Crockett/Rodeo Colaition also,have representatives on this committee and it simply must stay in place to ensure community support for , the next audit., Name (please.print) Address Phone Ove i /C/�c 64111 fc c< 0604060 Aub K� �ACRT,,oU _% amiao . 1640 PRizzRt10-E IR'-" 53qLorinj A✓" Cpockeltt" °SIO ClOcIpi�I C-14 ( t LL Z,_/:�&Z9 Petition of Support RECEIVED Retain Membership and Roles of -Good .Neighbor Audit C i t e �f995 We-urge the Contra Costa Board of-Supervisors to require thak "B090J Co1S°RS audit committee of the Good Neighbor Agreement be kept in place to monitor the county's upcoming accident prevention audit of the Unocal refinery. Citizens for a-Better Environment has, a spot on the Good Neighbor audit committee and has played an essential role because of their expertise . in making refineries cleaner and safer and because they have full time staff that can actually spend,the time it takes to really,monitor these audits. Therefore CBE should retain its role to monitor ,the upcoming county audit in the same manner as in the Good Neighbor Agreement. The OCAW Union, SEA and Crockett%Rodeo Colaition also have representatives on this committee and it simply-must stay in place to ,ensure.community support for the next audit. Name (please.print) Address Phone . � !3 5- ML �� r �Bhn. P 1113 336 �0 �„4 57` `787 , oZD_q S Z. 7 v 7, 3 Y _ 117WA A,1 A,6�d�_ r J At _a 797 -bye Petition of Support RECEIVE® Retain Membership and Roles of Good Neighbor Audit Committee SEP 1.2--1995 We�urge;the Contra Costa Board of Supervisors to require th9t A co 1SORs audit committee of the Good.Neighbor Agreement be kept in. place to - monitor the county's upcoming accident prevention audit of the Unocal refinery. Citizens for a Better Environment has a spot on the Good,Neighbor audit committee and has played an essential role because of their expertise in making refineries cleaner and safer and because they have full time staff thaf can actually spend the time it takes to really monitor these audits. Therefore CBE should retain its role to monitor- the upcoming county audit.in the same .manner as in the Good Neighbor Agreement. The OCAW Union, . SEA and Crockett/Rodeo Colaition also have representatives on this committee and it simply must stay in place to ensure community support for the next audit. Name-(please print) Address Phone q- 1±51 ,1 4 4 23 CJ s!"l.ocii N� X(-�Z n of kc J� r4OZO f�S Petition of Support RECEIVED Retain. Membership and Roles of Good ,Neighbor Audit CorSVYi e1995 We� urge the Contra Costa Board of Supervisors to require that they BQANOSTA co'soRs audit committeer of the Good Neighbor Agreement be kept in.place to monitor the county's upcoming accident prevention audit of the Unocal refinery. Citizens for a Better Environment has a spot on the Good Neighbor audit committee and has played an essential role because of their expertise in making.refine.ries cleaner and safer.and because they have full time staff that can actually spend the time it takes to really monitor these audits: Therefore CBE should retain, its role to monitor the upcoming county audit in the same manner as in the.Good Neighbor Agreement. The OCAW Union, SEA and Crockett/Rodeo Colaition also have representatives on this committee and it simply must stay in place to ensure community support for the next audit. Name (please print) Address Phone `Z' 1 c l ams tom -D�-� C-r664 -79-7 19:FS-1 X 6 0! .Karen. Lire a Alp j j tC- (L 3,57- ��► ��. �� 78.7- 2—>4 C c( Q► wi �o� 1 6 ;° o c[cam -7Y7-15-Y1" 3 2 o" S 0 r C73._ C14 ror-1 gg- 2 Petition of Support Retain Membership and Roles of Good Neighbor AudifNEGawim SEP 12 1995 We-1 urge the Contra ;Costa Board of Supervisors to require that the existing CLERKBOARD OF SUPERVISORS audit committee of the Good Neighbor Agreement be kept in placr cosrA Co. monitor the county's upcoming accident prevention audit, of the Unocal refinery. Citizens for a Better Environment has a spot on the Good Neighbor audit committee and has played, an essential role because of their expertise in making refineries cleaner and safer and because they have full time staff that can actually spend the time it takes to really monitor these audits. Therefore CBE should retain its role to monitor the, upcoming county audit in the same manner as in the Good Neighbor Agreement. The OCAW Union, SEA and Crockett/Rodeo Colaition also have representatives on this committee and it simply must stay in place to ensure community support for the next audit. Name (please print) Address. Phone R 4 NPS s y .5t6 U� -tO'Lo -7$7- 3(-(+-7 J jo 09 61 ��AIA✓d Cd"7_1 2_'34�- Uki14 III C lfc�c_)4_ 707 11) ,d, a ' cl 0 q q,5 " 3 73 0,0 1)M Ct 'f\( l Z3 7WANM �Q6( e? ) 77 z 4 T