HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 08081995 - C129 C.127, C.128, C.129,
and C.130
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Adopted this Order on August 8, 1995 , by the following vote:
AYES: Supervisors Rogers, Smith, DeSaulnier, Torlakson and Bishop
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
SUBJECT: Correspondence
C.127 LETTERS from Martin R. Englemann, P.E., Deputy Director, Planning,
Contra Costa Transportation Authority, 1340 Treat Blvd., Suite 150, Walnut
Creek, CA 94596, dated July 25, 1995, and former Supervisor Tom Powers,
dated November 8, 1994, transmitting responses to the Board's letters on the
Countywide Comprehensive Transportation Plan.
****REFERRED TO TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE
C.128 LETTER from Bill Baker, U.S. Representative, 10th District, 1724 Longworth
Building, Washington, DC. 20515, dated July 17, 1995, in response to Board's
letter on the BART extension to the San Francisco Airport, advising of his
commitment to worthy transportation projects such as BART.
****REFERRED TO TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE
p{t
C.129 LETTER from Denny Larson, Refinery Network Coordinator, Citizens for a
Better Environment - California, 500 Howard Street, #506, San Francisco, CA
94105, dated July 27, 1995, providing suggestions for inclusion in the Safety
Audit for the Unocal Refinery.
****REFERRED TO COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR AND HEALTH
SERVICES DIRECTOR
C.130 LETTER from R.H. Garside, AGM Operations, Alameda-Contra Costa Transit
District, 1600 Franklin Street, Oakland, CA 94612, dated July 20, 1995,
advising of the District's decision to stop supporting its bus shelter program,
and inquiring if the Board would be willing to assume the care and upkeep of
the bus shelters in the County that are currently in excellent condition.
****REFERRED TO COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR AND
TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE
IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the recommendations as
noted (****) are APPROVED.
1 here!,!certify that this is a true andcorreCtcopyof
C.C. Correspondents an action taken and entered on the=Loa,
the
Transportation Committee Board of supe on the dam shoWn.5
County Administrator �s BATCH NWIM Uo clerk Ad hher�Ward
Health Services - Director
By � oavugr
JUL-27-1995 11=11 HEALTH SERVICES ADMIN. 510 370 5098 P.02/04
CITIZENS
FOR �, 12.9
A
BETTER
ENVIRONMENT
TO., Contra Costa Board of Supervisors
FA: Citizens for a Better Environment, Denny Larson, Refinery Network Coordinator
DA: 7-12.95
RE: UNOCAL.76 Second Safety Audit: Recommendations for continuing involvement
of Audit Committee of the Goad Neighbor Agreement and Scope
Thank you for your action of July 11, 1995,to initiate a second safety aucit of the
Unocal refinery that is focused on preventing future Chemical spills. This is an
excellent first step to resolving community concerns regarding Unocars pattern of
unsafe operations.
Two key areas will need to be resolved in order to ensure consistency with ft
first audit of the Good Neighbor Agreement and ensure community support of the
second audit:
1. Ensuring role of existing Audit Committee
2. Requiring a scope of the audit that is complete enough to address the
breadth of problems at the refinery
05E would like to forward tyre following recommendations to you in regard to
these two key issues:
1. The role of the of existing Audit Committee of the Good Neighbor Agreement must
be retained as specified in the agreement as minimum. We will suggest possible
improvements based on our experience.
2. The scope of the audit should address:
•age of equipment and operation beyond design specifications,
•frequence+ of maintenance,
•corpowate policies such as "pay for performance" which may hinder safe operation,
-the use of non-union, less-skilled contract workers
-whistieblower protections and incentives for employees
-opportunities to upgrade equipment to prevent pollution and spills
Please contact us at 415-243-8373 to discuss and to schedule upcoming meetings.
CBE-California + SQA Howard Straet #506, San Francisco, CA 94105 • 415-243-8373
JLIL-12-1995 13:57 415 2438980 99% P-
"'jbL-27-1995 ilii HEALTH SERVICES ADMIN. 510 370 509E P.03/04
management program, and the results of the Process Hazards Analyses
performed as part of the Process Safety Management Program (as required
under 13 CCR §5109(e)). An Audit Committee will be established to oversee the
independent audit, which will be comprised.of two representatives from the
Crockett/Rodeo Coalition, one representing each Community; one
representative from the Shoreline Environmental Alliance; one representative
from Citizens for a Setter Environment; one representative from the CAP; and
two representatives from Unocal, one management and one non-management
employee_ The Audit Committee shall be established by January 31, 19915.
The role of the Audit Committee is to provide oversight of the independent
auditor(described more fully below), review the results of the independent
auditors report, and discuss the recommendations contained in the final audit
report with the Refinery. Unocal is responsible for operating the Refinery in a
safe manner and therefore will be responsible for the implementation of any of
the recommendations contained in the final audit report (including the decision
concerning whether a recommendation should be implemented).
The Audit Committee shall be responsible for the following:
Preparation of a schedule for the audit, which will begin no later than
April 1, 19,95 or such other date as determined by the Audit Committee.
• Further delineating the focus of the audit within the scope defined by this
agreement.
• Preparation of a request for proposal.
• Hiring and/or termination of the audit contractor. They contractor will be -
selected by the community representatives and must be approved by
Unocal.
• Monitoring the progress of the audit, including s, € ,
• Meeting with the audit contractor to discuss the facility and to review the
auditor's reports.
• Meeting with Unocal management as needed.
Reporting to the broader community on the results of the audit after
discussion of the results with management.
• Reviewing the results of the audit including the findings and
recommendations.
The contractor will prepare an audit prot000i to be reviewed and approved by
the Audit Committee and will conduct the audit in a timely manner. 'The
contractor wip oonduct the audit in accordance with the final request for
proposal, including any attachments thareto, as prepared by the Audit
Committee. The contractor will have access to all information deemed
necessary by the Audit Cpmmittee, including trade secret information upon
J
Z0'd 0858£tZ STV S66T-ZT- ,�
JQL-47-1995 11:12 iEALTH SERVICES ADMIN. 510 3?0 5099 P.04/04 ' `
execution of a written confidentiality agreement. (As used herein, trade secrets
shalt have the sarne meaning as provided in the Emergency Planning and
Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA), Section 11042.) Unocal will provide
the audit Contractor with access to employees in order- to conduct confidential
interviews on subjects that are within the scope of the audit, without the threat
of termination or discrimination in any way for providing information.
If actions are required to address audit findings, Unocal also agrees to fund a
follow-up audit by the same audit contractor to evaluate the effectiveness of
said planned actions. The follow-up audit will be conducted in the same
manner as defined in this Agreement for the initial independent audit described
above,
3) The ):refinery is scheduled to be audited on an annual basis. Unocal currently
conducts two types of audits at its facilities: 1) on a biennial basis a health,
environment and se-ety regulatory compliance audit is conducted by can
independent contractor accountable to the President of 75 Products Company;
and 2) in alternate years, Corporate experts conduct an audit of the Refinery's
safety management system, utilizing the International Safety }dating System
(ISRS), a comprehensive auditing program recognized as an industry standard.
The Corporate experts are certified and accredited through the ISRS.
Unocal agrees to provide a biennial one-day executive training session about
the Internationaf Safety Rating System beginning in 1995; members of the
Community Advisory Panel (CAP) and each Signatory or its designated
representative, will be invited to attend at their awn discretion.
As requested by the Signatories, Unocal suggested to the GAP, on more than
one occasion, that representatives of the Crockett/Rodeo Coalition and SEA be
added to the CAP as members. The CAP chose not to create an institutional
seat for SEA as part of its present membership. In order to facilitate further
cooperation with SEA, Unocal hereby agrees to the fallawfng.
(a) Unocal will transmit to a designated representaUve of the SEA, ail written
and verbal incident nafrficaUons and written materials provided to the
CAP by Unocal. This provision speciflCaally excludes any information
relating to the ongoing auditing process described in this Section VII,
Paragraph 3. in addition, If trade secret information is Involved, such
infonnation will not be provided to the designated representative of SEA
until a written secrecy agreement has been entered into and fully
executed.
crws �ax�aads - Z 2 -
TOTAL P.04