HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 08081995 - C100 TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Contra r - �
.�,..
FROM: HARVEY E. BRAGDON Costa�unty
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT � a�
DATE: August 8, 1995
SUBJECT: Ratification of the Zoning Administrator's Decision Regarding Shell Oil
Company's Compliance with Conditions of Approval (LUP 2009-92)
SPECIFIC REQUEST (S) OR RECOMMENDATIONS) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATIONS
Ratify the Zoning Administrator' s decision that Shell Oil Company
has complied with Condition of Approval #22 for the Lubricants
Hydrotreater-2 and the Recovered Oil Tank.
FISCAL IMPACT
None .
BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS
When the Board of Supervisors approved the Land Use Permit for
Shell Oil Company' s Clean Fuels Project (County LUP #2009-92) , the
Board specified that the Zoning Administrator' s decision regarding
several conditions of approval be placed on the Board' s consent
calendar for ratification. As directed by the Board at the October
4, 1994 meeting, the County Zoning Administrator' s decision
discussed herein has been placed on the Zoning Administrator' s
agenda for August 7, 1995. Any comments received at t meeting
will be forwarded to the Board.
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: XX YES SIGNAT
RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDA ION OF O COMMITTEE
APPROVE OTHER
S I GNATURE (S)
ACTION OF BOARD ON August 8 , 1995 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED x OTHER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A
x UNANIMOUS (ABSENT TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN
AYES: NOES: ACTION TAKEN AND ENTERED ON THE
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN.
Contact: Catherine Kutsuris (510/646-2036) ATTESTED August 8 , 1995
cc: Community Development Department (CDD) PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERK OF
Health Services Department: RMPP THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Shell Oil (via CDD) AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
0( jBY , DEPUTY
CK:db
c:shl.bo2
a:ck1/drb/sh1.bo
Ratification of decision on Shell Oil Company
August 1, 1995
Page Two
Condition of Approval #22 : Hazard and Operability Study
This condition requires Shell Oil to prepare a Hazard and
Operability Study and accident consequence analysis for all
elements of the Clean Fuels Project with the exception of the
office building, the control rooms and the maintenance/warehouse
buildings .
Shell Oil Company completed the required study for the Lubricants
Hydrotreater-2 and the Recovered Oil Tank. This information was
evaluated by the Risk Management and Prevention Program Team of the
Health Services Department. Their review included a detailed
examination of the hazard analyses and off-site consequences as
well as scrutiny of all the programs or aspects of the Company
(e.g. , operating procedures, preventive maintenance programs and
operator training) which are designed to prevent or mitigate
accidents or process anomalies . The review included document
assessments, management and operations personnel interviews and
inspection of the unit to verify that it conforms to the design
developed.
The Health Services Department made recommendations to reduce the
probability or severity of accidents of the Lubricants
Hydrotreater-2 (refer to the attached HSD memorandum) . These
recommendations were accepted by the Zoning Administrator and will
be required of Shell Oil . The Health Services Department will
conduct follow-up field inspections to ensure that construction
conforms to the design specified, and that all recommendations
identified have been followed.
CK:db
c:5hl.bo
a:skl/drb/shl.bo
7/24/95
sti_-L Contra Costa County
Health Services Department
a _ -
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION r 11 4 AM 10, 40
A'couK�i HAZARDOUS MATERIALS/OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
k _xf
C c i
{ DEPT
r.
jkill'
TO: ✓Catherine Kutsur' Coun Zoning Administrator.',
DATE: July 24, 1995
FROM: Lewis G. Pascall r ,
Deputy Director
Health Services Depa ent, Hazardous Materials Division
SUBJECT: CONSENT ITEM FOR SHELL REFINERY CLEAN FUELS PROJECT,
CONDITION #22, RECOVERED OIL TANK
Executive Summary:
The Contra Costa County Health ' Services Department (CCCHSD)
Hazardous Materials Risk Management and Prevention Program Team has
completed the Clean Fuels review for the Shell Martinez
Manufacturing Complex's Recovered Oil Tank, scheduled startup date
of September 1. Shell submitted a summary of the Recovered Oil
Tank's HazOp to your office on March 30, 1995 with a copy to
CCCHSD.
Process Description:
The Recovered Oil Tank is located in the northeastern portion of
the Shell Martinez Manufacturing Complex. The purpose of the
Recovered Oil Tank is to store recovered oil and to separate the
aqueous phase and the hydrocarbon phase. The hydrocarbon phase is
recovered and the aqueous phase is treated.
. The Recovered Oil Storage Tank is a new tank that will be
interchangeable with two existing tanks. The recovered oil is
transferred into the new tank which has a gravity discharge. The
existing additive system will be used for treating the aqueous
phase and helping to separate the aqueous phase from the
hydrocarbon phase. There is a new sulfuric acid system that will
be used with this tank.
CCCHSD Findings:
My staff has performed a detailed line-by-line review of the Hazard
and Operability (HazOp) study performed for the Recovered Oil Tank.
Design of safety systems as well as operational and maintenance
issues have been addressed. Additionally, my staff has inspected
the unit to verify that the construction so far conforms to the
design specified.
There are no additionally recommendations for this tank.
cc: RMPP Team
4333`Pa0 666 Boulevard • Mar inez,:Calfomla,94553 • (510) 646-2286
Contra Costa County
Health Services Department
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION
osTa.co6K`�
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS/OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
DATE: July 21, 1995
TO: Catherine Kutsuris, County Zoning Administrator, Community Development
Department
FROM: Lewis G. Pascalli, r
Deputy Director
Health Services Depa e , Hazardous Materials Division
SUBJECT: CONSENT ITEM FOR SHELL REFINERY CLEAN FUELS PROJECT
CONDITION #22, FOR THE LUBRICANTS HYDROTREATER -2
Executive Summary:
The Contra Costa County Health Services Department (CCCHSD) Hazardous Materials Risk
Management and Prevention Program team has completed the Clean Fuels Project review for the
Lubricants Hydrotreater-2 (LHT-2). Shell plans to start-up LHT-2 about October 16, 1995.
Shell submitted a summary of the Hazard and Operability Study (HAZOP) to you and CCCHSD
on June 19, 1995.
Process Description:
The LHT-2 will process low viscosity index(VI) lubricating oils and upgrade them to medium
viscosity index quality. This is done by heating the low VI oils and saturating aromatic
compounds with hydrogen over catalyst in a reactor. Sulfur, nitrogen and oxygen content of the
lubricating oil is also reduced.
CCCHSD Findings:
My staff has performed a detailed line-by-line examination of the LHT-2 HAZOP study that
included our reviewing the design of safety systems as well as operational and maintenance
issues. Additionally, my staff has field checked the unit, which is still under construction, to
verify that it basically conforms to the design presented in the HAZOP.
4333 Pacheco Boulevard • Martinez, Califomia 94553 • (510)',646-2286
We fmd that the Shell HAZOP adequately identifies process hazards and recommend that the
following be added to the mitigations identified by Shell:
• Add a check valve between the FV-63 connection and V-13004
• Add a low flow alarm to the make-up hydrogen supply
• Car seal open block valves on thermal relief restricting orifices
My staff will perform a follow up review, consistent with Condition #23 of the Land Use
Permit, to ensure that all mitigations identified have been implemented.
Conclusion:
We recommend approval of the HAZOP study for the Lubricants Hydrotreater-2.