The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMINUTES - 09201994 - TC.1 (2) ;- -- Contra TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ' / _ Costa FROM: Transportation Committee County DATE: September 12 , 1994 SUBJECT: Report on the County's 1994 Annual Compliance Checklist for the Contra Costa Congestion Management Program SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATIONS) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATIONS Find the policies and programs of Contra Costa County, as reported in the 1994 Annual Compliance Checklists submitted to the Regional Transportation Planning Committees (see Exhibits A through D) , conform to the requirements for compliance with the Contra Costa Congestion Management Program (CMP) , and authorize their signature by the Chair of the Board of Supervisors. FISCAL IMPACT Compliance with the CMP will ensure the County receives its allocation of state gas tax revenues pursuant to Proposition 111 and will maintain its eligibility for other state and federal transportation revenues. These revenues are used for transportation purposes. BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATION As the Congestion Management Agency (CMA) , the Contra Costa Transportation Authority has the responsibility of ensuring that local jurisdictions comply with the Congestion Management Program (CMP) . To monitor local compliance, the Authority has developed two checklists to ensure that the requirements of the CMP are CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: XX YES SIGNATURE RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR X RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE (S) : Gayle Bishop Tom Torlakson ACTION OF BOARD ON SEP 2, 0-1994 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A X UNANIMOUS (ABSENT TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN AYES: NOES: ACTION TAKEN AND ENTERED ON THE ABSENT: ABSTAIN: MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. Orig: Community Development Department ATTESTED SEP 2 01994 Contact Person: Steven Goetz, 646-2134 PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERK OF cc: Public Works, Transportation Engineering THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR 1�21LLn BY aii(, c i , DEPUTY F- 1994 Annual Compliance Checklists for the CMP September 12, 1994 Page Two met. One checklist is for local jurisdictions. The other checklist is for the Regional Transportation Planning Committees (RTPC' s) . The checklist for local jurisdictions asks whether each jurisdiction has met the following three requirements of the CMP: - Consistency with traffic Level of Service and transit standards; - Adoption of a Transportation Demand Management ordinance; and - Evaluation of the impacts of land use decisions on the transportation system. In addition, the checklist asks whether each jurisdiction has regularly participated in RTPC planning activities and whether there is other information that should be considered in the review of the checklist. Each jurisdiction submits their checklist first to its RTPC. The RTPC's will compile the checklists of member jurisdictions, complete the RTPC checklist, and transmit all the checklists to the Authority by September 30, 1993 . The County' s checklists for each RTPC were completed by the Community Development Department and are attached as Exhibits A through D. The checklists certify compliance with the CMP requirements for each RTPC area. CONSEQUENCES OF NEGATIVE ACTION Failure to approve the Transportation Committee 's recommendation will cause the County to be out of compliance with the CMP, cause the State to withhold the County' s Proposition 111 allocation of gas tax revenues, lead to a reduction in road maintenance projects in unincorporated areas, and may prevent the use of future federal and state transportation revenues in the unincorporated area. SLG:cmplist.bo TC, 1 Southwest Area E X H I B I T A Transportation Committee CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY - — Jurisdiction Congestion Management Program Contra Costa Local Jurisdiction Compliance Checklist To be gilded out and subtuitrcd by local jurisdictions Year 1994 1. Participation in 1!•tultijurisdictional Planning Over the past year, has the jurisdiction regularly participated in activities of the Regional Transportation Planning Committee (RTPC)or other forums established by CCTA, including, as needed. amendment of Action Plans to satisfy requirements for Deficiency Plans? YES NO 2. Attainment of Traffic Level of Service Standards 2-a. Has the t.CTA identified, through its measurement of levels of service on the CMP network, violations of adopted CMP standards on freeway segments or at CMP intersections located within the jurisdiction? YES NO No Deficiency Plan Required (go to 3.) ❑ � ❑ 2-b. If the answer to 2-a, is yes, has the sub-area's RTPC approved a Deficiency Plan or Action Plan amendments satisfying Deficiency Plan requirements for road segments or intersections in the jurisdiction? YES NO No Deficiency Plan Required (go to 3.) If the answer is no, or no Deficiency Plan is required, go to Question 3. 2-c. If the answer to 2-a, is yes, has the jurisdiction designated the segments or intersections for which Deficiency Plans have been approved as deficient and adopted a Deficiency Plan (in the form of an Action Plan amendment) for those segments consistent with Government Code Section 65089.3(b)? If yes, list segments for which Deficiency Plans have been adopted. YES NO ❑ ❑ 2-d. If Deficiency Pians have been adopted for road segments or intersections within the jurisdiction, that identify actions that your jurisdiction must undertake, please describe below actions the jurisdiction has taken during the past year to implement adopted Deficiency Plans. .U:� ;,A April 29, 1994 Page 2 Jurisdiction Year Contra Costa Transportation Authority ultra Costa 1994 CoVestiou Management Prograus Local Jurimlication Coalldiance Chtckliist 2-e. If Deficiency Pians have been adopted for road segments or intersections within other jurisdictions in the sub- area that identify actions that your jurisdiction must undertake, please describe below actions that your jurisdiction has taken during the past year to implement those adopted Deficiency Plans. 3. Trip Reduction and Travel Demand Ordinance 3a- Has the jurisdiction adopted and implemented a transportation demand management ordinance as described in the CMP? (requirements are identical to those of the CCTA Growth Management Program) YES NO IAN I Date Adopted 4/19/94 Resolution # 94-27 d. Land Use/Transportation Evaluation Program 4-a. Is the jurisdiction participating in the preparation, adoption and implementation of Action Plans for Routes of Regional Significance consistent with the requirements of the Contra Costa Transportation Authority's Growth Management Program? YES NO n ❑ 4-b. Over the past year, have traffic impact studies consistent with the CCTA's Technical Procedures been conducted as part of the application review process for all development projects estirnated to generate more than 100 peak-hour vehicle trips? YES NO N/A ® ❑ ❑ EXPLAIN: ,+,: � April 29, 1994 Page 3 Jurisdiction 'Year � �V1 Contra Costa Transportation Authority �� 1994 D CoageWoo Management Progrwu EAW Juri%dication CouatAiance Checklist 4-c. Over the past year, has the cost of mitigating the impacts of land use decisions on the regional transportation system been estimated, consistent with procedures described in the CMP, relevant Action Plans for Routes of Regional Significance, and other materials published by the CCTA? YES NO N/A LTJ ❑ ❑ EXPLAIN: 5. Other Considerations If there is any other information that the jurisdiction believes is relevant to the evaluation of confortnity with the CMP, it should be attached to this checklist for consideration by the CCTA. 6. Review and Approval of Checklist for Annual Compliance Reporting This checklist was prepared for submittal by: Harvey H. Bra cion Director of Conwanity Development ( notName) (Title) (510) 646-2026 (Signature) one The cowroil/board of Supervisors has reviewed by completed checklist and found that the (Jurisdiction Name) policies and programs of the jurisdiction as repotted herein conform to the requirements for compliance with the Contra Costa Coneestion Management Program. Certified: Q�iyle Bishop Date: (Print Name) (Si4 ature) Title: Chair, Board of Supervisors Phil Batchelor, CleerT—ofIneDudlu I Attest: Supervisors and County Administrator Z911, J AJila-, (Signature) .��.►sR a April 29, 1994 Transpac Committee E X H I B I T B _-- CONTRA, COSTA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY Jurisdiction _ Congestion Management Program Contra Costa Local Jurisdiction Compliance Checklist To be our and nrbmirred by local jurisdictions Year 1994 1. Participation in Muhijurisdictional Planning I-a. Over the past year, has the jurisdiction regularly participated in activities of the Regional Transportation Planning Committee (RTPC) or other forums established by CCTA, including, as needed, amendment of Action Plans to satisfy requirements for Deficiency Plans? YES NO LE ❑ 2. Attainment of Traffic Level of Service Standards 2-a. Has the OCTA identified, through its measurement of levels of service on the CMP network, violations of adopted CMP standards on freeway segments or at CMP intersections located within the jurisdiction? YES NO No Deficiency Plan Required (go to 3.) 2-b. If the answer to 2-a. is yes, has the sub-area's RTPC approved a Deficiency Plan or Action Plan amendments satisfying Deficiency Plan requirements for road segments or intersections in the jurisdiction? YES NO No Deficiency Plan Required (go to 3.) ❑ ❑ ❑ If the answer is no, or no Deficiency Plan is required, go to Question 3. 2-c. If the answer to 2-a, is yes, has the jurisdiction designated the segments or intersections for which Deficiency -Plans have been approved as deficient and adopted a Deficiency Plan (in the form of an Action PIan amendment) for those segments consistent with Government Code Section 65089.3(b)? If yes, list segments for which Deficiency Plans have been adopted. YES NO ❑ ❑ 2-d. If Deficiency Plans have been adopted for road segments or intersections within the jurisdiction, that identify actions that your jurisdiction must undertake, please describe below actions the jurisdiction has taken during the past year to implement adopted Deficiency Plans. � = April 29, 1994 Page 2 Jurwictiou Year contra costa Transportatiou Authority Untra C.o9�ta 1994--] conewou Management Prvgraru LOW Juriaticatitart Cututdiauct Checklist 2-e. If Deficiency Plans have been adopted for road segments or intersections within other jurisdictions in the sub- area that identify actions that your jurisdiction must undertake, please describe below actions that your jurisdiction has taken during the past year to implement those adopted Deficiency Plans. 3. Trip Reduction and Travel Demand Ordinance 3-a. Has the jurisdiction adopted and implemented a transportation demand management ordinance as described in tete CMP? (requirements are identical to those of the CCTA Growth Management Program) YES NO 11-1 F1 Date Adopted 4/19/94 Resolution Il 94-27 4. Land Use I Transportation Evaluation Program 4-a. Is the jurisdiction participating in the preparation, adoption and implementation of Action Plans for Routes of Regional Significance consistent with the requirements of the Contra Costa Transportation Authority's Growth Management Program? YES NO ® ❑ 4-b. Over the past year, have traffic impact studies consistent with the CCTA's Technical Procedures been conducted as part of the application review process for all development projects estimated to generate more than 100 peak-hour vehicle trips? YES NO NIA ® ❑ ❑ .EXPLAIN: r6: %& April 29, 1994 Page 3 Jurisdiction Year -"Contra COSH Transportation Authority C4cntra99 t. 'f Coageo;oa Management Program LA"Jurisdication Cou+lolia nce Checklist 177 F 4-c. Over the past year, has the cost of mitigating the impacts of land use decisions on the regional transportation system been estimated, consistent with procedures described in the CMF, relevant Action Plans for Routes of Regional Significance, and other materials published by the CCTA? YES NO N/A ® ❑ ❑ EXPLAIN: S. Other Considerations If there is any other information that the jurisdiction believes is relevant to the evaluation of conformity with the CMP, it should be attached to this checklist for consideration by the CCTA. 6. Review and Approval of Checklist for Annual Compliance Repotting This checklist was prepared for submittal-by: Harvey B. Bra don Director of Corrmunity Development notName) (Title) (510) 646-2026 (Signature) one The cm-ne.Uboard of Supervisors has reviewed by completed checklist and found that the (Jurisdiction Name) policies and programs of the jurisdiction as reported herein conform to the requirements for compliance with the Contra Costa Congestion Management Program. Certified: .Gayle-Bishop Date: (Print Name) X4�z�-, ( tgnature) Title: Chair, Board of Supervisors Phil Batchelor, Clerk of the Hoara o Attest: Supervisors and County Administrator (Signature) � �* April 29, 1994 EXHIBIT CTransplan Committee a CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY Jurisdiction Congestion Management Program Contra Costa Local Jurisdiction Compliance Checklist — To be rolled out and subnritreel by local Arriulicrinns Year 1994 __] 1. Participation in Multiiurisdictional Planning I-a. Over the past year, has the jurisdiction regularly participated in activities of the Regional Transportation Planning Committee (RTPC)or other forums established by CCTA, including, as needed, amendment of Action Plans to satisfy requirements for Deficiency Plans? YES NO N ❑ 2. Attainment of Traffic Level of Service Standards 2-a. Has the C:CTA identified, through its measurement of levels of service on the CMP network, violations of adopted CMP standards on freeway segments or at CMP intersections located within the jurisdiction? YES NO No Deficiency Plan Required (go to 3.) 2-b. If the answer to 2-a. is yes, has the sub-area's RTPC approved a Deficiency Plan or Action Plan amendments satisfying Deficiency Plan requirements for road segments or intersections in the jurisdiction? YES NO No Deficiency Plan Required (go to 3.) ❑ ❑ ❑ If the answer is no, or no Deficiency Plan is required, go to Question 3. 2-c. If the answer to 2-a. is yes, has the jurisdiction designated the segments or intersections for which Deficiency Plans have been approved as deficient and adopted a Deficiency Plan (in the form.of an Action Plan amendment) for those segments consistent with Government Code Section 65489.3(b)? If yes, list segments for which Deficiency Plans have been adopted. YES NO 2-d. If Deficiency Plans have been adopted for road segments or intersections within the jurisdiction, that identify actions that your jurisdiction must undertake, please describe below actions the jurisdiction has taken during the past year to implement adopted Deficiency Plans. +�= April 29, 1994 Page 2 jurisdictiou Year .Contra Costa Transportatiou Authority U1td GDS 1994 Congestion Ataaag+ement Prograut Local yuricdication Cunutdiancr Cht<ktist 2-e. If Deficiency Plans have been adopted for road segments or intersections within other jurisdictions in the sub- area that identify actions that your jurisdiction must undertake, please describe below actions that your jurisdiction has taken during the past year to implement those adopted Deficiency Plans. 3. Tt-ip Reduction and Travel Demand Ordinance: 3-a. Has the jurisdiction adopted and implemented a transportation demand management ordinance as described in the CMP? (requirements are identical to those of the CCTA Growth Management Program) YES NO Date Adopted 4/19/94 Resolution fl 94-27 4, Land Use,/Transportation Evaluation Program 4-a. Is the jurisdiction participating in the preparation, adoption and implementation of Action Plans for Routes of Regional Significance consistent with the requirements of the Contra Costa Transportation Authority's Growth Management Program? YES NO Q ❑ 4-b. Over the past year, have traffic impact studies consistent with the CCTA's Technical Procedures been conducted as part of the application review process for all development projects estimated to generate more than 100 peak-hour vehicle trips? YES NO NIA a ❑ ❑ EXPLAIN: rt.x.vele..w April 29, 1994 :r.page 3 Juricd+ctioo Year � 1 9 —7 :Contra Cosies Transportation Authority (Contra �� 1 94 t Congestion Management Prvgnuu Local Juri dic rtiuu Guutaiwace Chtcktist 4-c. Over the past year, has the cost of mitigating the impacts of land use decisions on the regional transportation system been estimated, consistent with procedures described in the CMP, relevant Action Plans for Routes of Regional Significance, and other materials published by the CCTA? YES NO NIA 0 ❑ ❑ EXPLAIN: 5. Other Considerations If there is any other information that the jurisdiction believes is relevant to the evaluation of conformity with the CMP, it should be attached to this checklist for consideration by the CCTA. 6. Review and Approval of Checklist for Annual Compliance Reporting This checklist was prepared for submittal-by: Harvey E. Bra don Director of Cormranity Development (PrintName) (Title) (510) 646-2026 (Signature) one The oeitacil/board of Supervisors has reviewed by completed checklist and found that the (Jurisdiction Name) policies and programs of the jurisdiction as reported herein conform to the requirements for compliance with the Contra Costa Congestion Management Program. Certified: ' Gayle Bisjiop Date: (Print Name) (Si- ature) Tide: Chair, Board of Supervisors Phil Batchelor, Clerk of the Board of Attest: Supervisors and County Administrator (Signature) f OL *yam* April 29, 1994 West Contra Costa E X H I B I T D Transportation Advisory Committee ~ CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY �— — ---Jurisdiction Congestion Management Program Contra Crista Local Jurisdiction Compliance Checklist To be filled out and subnurtcd by local turiuliciiorrs Year 1994 1. Participation in Multijurisdiclional Planning 1-a. Over the past year, has the jurisdiction regularly participated in activities of the Regional Transportation Planning Committee (RTPC) or other forums established by CCTA, including, as needed, amendment of Action Plans to satisfy requirements for Deficiency Plans? YES NO ® ❑ 2. Attainment of Traffic Level of Service Standards 2-a. Has the C.CTA identified, through its measurement of levels of service on the CMP network, violations of adopted CMP standards on freeway segments or at CMP intersections located within the jurisdiction? YES NO No Deficiency Plan Required (go to 3.) ❑ ® ❑ 2-b. If the answer to 2-a. is yes, has the sub-area's RTPC approved a Deficiency Plan or Action Plan amendments satisfying Deficiency Plan requirements for road segments or intersections in the jurisdiction? YES NO No Deficiency Plan Required (go to 3.) ❑ ❑ ❑ If the answer is no, or no Deficiency Plan is required, go to Question 3. 2-c. If the answer to 2-a. is yes, has the jurisdiction designated the segments or intersections for which Deficiency Plans have been approved as deficient and adopted a Deficiency Plan (in the form of an Action Plan amendment) for those segments consistent with Government Code Section 65089.3(b)? If yes, list segments for which Deficiency Plans have been adopted. YES NO 2-d. If Deficiency Plans have been adopted for road segments or intersections within the jurisdiction, that identify actions that your jurisdiction must undertake, please describe below actions the jurisdiction has taken during the past year to implement adopted Deficiency Plans. � =� April 29, 1994 Page 2 Jusisdktiou Year Coatra Costa Transportation Authority J Dxitra O 1994 CowWestioa Management Program Local Juri dication Comistiaoce ChtcWlst 2-e. If Deficiency Plans have been adopted for road segments or intersections within other jurisdictions in,the sub- area that identify actions that your jurisdiction must undertake, please describe below actions that your jurisdiction has taken during the past year to implement those adopted Deficiency Plans. 3. Trip Reduction and Travel Demand Ordinance 3-a. Has the jurisdiction adopted and implemented a transportation demand management ordinance as described in the CMP? (requirements are identical to those of the CCTA Growth Management Program) YES NO ® ❑ Date Adopted 4/19/94 Resolution ft 94-27 4. Land Use I Transportation Evaluation Program 4a- Is the jurisdiction participating in the preparation, adoption and implementation of Action Plans for Routes of Regional Significance consistent with the requirements of the Contra Costa Transportation Authority's Growth Management Program? YES NO ® ❑ 4-b. Over the past year, have traffic impact studies consistent with the CCTA's Technical Procedures been conducted as part of the application review process for all development projects estimated to generate more than 100 peak-hour vehicle trips? YES NO N/A a ❑ ❑ EXPLAIN; rt,; wear. w April 29, 1994 „ Page 3 Jurisdiction Year Coatra Costa Tramportati:m Authority �...,� r nrt_ Coagesdaa Maoagetnewt Progrwu Local Jit"ka6tut Cony �c Aiwe ChecWst �i�tiltYd rWos 1994 4-c. Over the past year. has the cost of mitigating the impacts of land use decisions on the regional transportation system been estimated, consistent with procedures described in the CMP, relevant Action Pians for Routes of Regional Significance. and other materials published by the CCTA? YES NO NIA ® ❑ ❑ EXPLAIN: S. Other Considerations If there is any other information that the jurisdiction believes is relevant to the evaluation of conformity with the CMP, it should be attached to this checklist for consideration by the CCTA. 6. Review and Approval of Checklist for Annual Compliance Reporting This checklist was prepared for submittal by: Harvey H. Bra don Director of-�C^ omfmmity Development ( notName) (Title) (510) 646-2026 (Signature) one The cosat:iltboard of Supervisors has reviewed by completed checklist and found that the (Jurisdiction Name) policies and programs of the jurisdiction as reported herein conform to the requirements for compliance with the Contra Costa Congestion Management Program. Certified: '--Gayle_Bishop. Date: (Print Name) (Signa tare) Title: Chair, Board of Supervisors Phil Batchelor, Clerk of the Board of Attest: Supervisors and County Administrator (Signature) ,w�. w April 29, 1994