HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 09131994 - 1.42 R� .. AMENDED
CLAIM
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
September 13, 1994
Claim Against the County, or District governed by) BOARD ACTION
the Board of Supervisors, Routing Endorsements, ) NOTICE TO CLAIMANT
and Board Action. All Section references are to ) The copy of this document mailed to you is your notice of
California Government Codes. ) the action taken on your claim,:by the Board of Supervisors
(Paragraph IV below), given pursuant to Government Code
Amount: $2,753.00 + Section 913 and 915.4. Please note all •Warnings".
pow
CLAIMANT: pICCHI, Roger A. IQ
ATTOnNEY: Steinhart & Falconer
AU G 17 1994
333 Marke$ St. , 32nd Floor Date received COUNTY COUNSEL
ADDRESS: San Francisco, CA 94105-2150 BY DELIVERY TO CLERK ON Allgvst 15 W4FMNEZCALIF.
BY MAIL POSTMARKED: Hand Delivered v; o m v Counsel
1. FROM: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors TO: County Counsel
Attached is a copy of the above-noted claim.
ppN De
IL ATCHELOR, Clerk
DATED: �� /,7 81': puty
11. FROM: County Counsel 70: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
(✓� This claim complies substantially with Sections 910 and 910.2.
( ) This claim FAILS to comply substantially with Sections 910 and 910.2, and we are so notifying
claimant. The Board cannot act for 15 days (Section 910.8).
( ) Claim is not timely filed. The Clerk should return claim on ground that' it was filed late and send
warning of claimant's right to apply for leave to present a late claim (Section 911.3).
( ) Other:
Dated: $ 17 1,; q Deputy County Counsel
11I. FROM: Clerk of the Board TO: County Counsel (1) County Administrator (2)
( ) Claim was returned as untimely with notice to claimant (Section 911.3).,,
1V. BOARD ORDER: By unanimous vote of the Supervisors present
(•4 This Claim is rejected in full.
( ) Other:
I certify that this is a true and correct copy of the Board's Order entered in its minutes for
this date.
Dated: 13 99 PHIL BATCHELOR, Clerk, By . Deputy Clerk
WARNING (Gov. code section 913)
Subject to certain exceptions, you have only six (6) months from the date this notice was personally served or
Aeposited in the mail to file a court action on this claim. See Government Code Section 945.6.
You may seek the advice of,an attorney of your choice in connection with this matter. If you want to consult
an attorney, you should do so immediately. 'For additional warning see reverse side of this notice.
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
I declare under penalty of perjury that I am now, and at all times herein mentioned, have been a citizen of the
United States, over age 18; and that today I deposited in the United States Postal Service in Martinez,
California, postage fully prepaid a certified copy of this Board Order and Notice to Claimant, addressed to
'the claimant as Shown above.
Dated: BY: PHIL BATCHELOR by _Deputy Clerk
CC: County Counsel County Administrator
CONFIDENTIAL
COUNTY COUNSEL'S OFFICE
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA
MEMORANDUM
Date: August 15, 1994
TO: Jeanne Maglio, Clerk of the Board of Supervis rs
FROM: Victor J. Westman, County Counsel �.
By: Gregory C. Harvey, Deputy Count ns
RE: Claim of Roger Picchi
Please treat the attached document as an amended claim.
Thanks.
RE CE 6i/ED
AUG 151994
CLERK BOAT���O CUPF O ISORS
CO
STEINHART & FALCONER
A PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS
ATTORNEYS
333 MARKET STREET, THIRTY-SECOND FLOOR FACSIMILE(415)442-0856
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94105-2150 FACSIMILE(415)442-0834
(415) 777-3999
iD iat 1`L`L`1000OOA'$iiiBBP ,
p�lG 1 2 1994
ooUeTYcOUNSEL August 9, 1994
JNZZ CALIF•
RECEIVE® =T:
VIA CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED AUG 1 5
Victor J. Westman, Esq.
County Counsel CLERK BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
e��lTi?�COSTA CO.
Contra Costa County
County Administration Building
P. 0. Box 69
Martinez, California 94533-0116
Re: Claim of Roger Picchi, Lessee of Site CH-5,
Buchanan Field Airport
1500 Sally Ride Drive, Concord, California 94520
Dear Mr. Westman:
We are writing in response to your Notice of Insufficiency and/or Non-
Acceptance of Claim dated August 1, 1994, and sent in response to my letter
dated July 19, 1994, to the County Department of Public Works. Mr. Picchi had
not intended to make a formal claim for damage to his trees by that letter. We will
do so at this time since it appears that is how the County prefers to handle this
matter. A draft copy of that claim is enclosed.
In any case, we disagree with the County's reasons for rejecting our
previous statement of estimated damages or "claim" set forth in my letter of
July 19, 1994, viz:
1 . That the claim fails to state the name and post office address of
the claimant; and
2. That the claim fails to state the date, place or other
circumstances of the occurrence or transaction giving rise to the
claim asserted.
STEINHART & FALCONER
August 9, 1994
Victor J. Westman, Esq.
Page 2
The reference line in your Letter is to the "Claim of: Roger Picchi," so the County is
obviously on notice of the identity of the claimant. He is the county airfield's
lessee, as indicated in my letter, and receives correspondence at his office there.
We assume you know that address, and the location of his office was specified in
my letter, but we have also set forth that information above for your use.
On May 18, 1994, Mr. Picchi personally observed and took pictures of
the spraying of the use of Starthistle herbicide discussed in further detail in my July
19, 1994, letter to the County Department of Public Works. He believes this may
also have taken place prior to and for some days following that date. As described
in my letter, this spraying took place on his property boundary. Please refer to my
July 19, 1994 letter for further particulars or contact me with any requests you
-may have for more specific information.
Please note that my July 19, 1994 letter contains a number of
inquiries concerning environmental contamination at the airfield and connected with
a variety of ongoing activities there. If we do not receive a response to these
inquiries, Mr. Picchi will be forced to hire a consultant to investigate, determine and
report on these matters. While the county's cooperation would be appreciated and
could obviate the need for such an investigation, it does not appear to us at this
time that such cooperation will be forthcoming. If this impression is incorrect, we
hope you will contact us soon so that we may forego that investigation.
If you wish to resolve this claim informally, please contact me no later
than August 15, or we will have no choice but to formally file a claim concerning
the damage caused by use of the Starthistle herbicide.
Very truly yours,
Ericurence
ELL:ems
cc: Mr. Dick R. Awenius
Airports Lease Manager
Mr. Roger Picchi
P.S. Mr. Awenius: Mr. Picchi and I request that you copy me on all
further correspondence in this matter.
ELL
1 STEINHART &.'FALCONER
ERIC L. LAURENCE, State Bar No. 130167
.2 333 Market Street, 32nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94105-2150 1Dh
3 Telephone: (415) 777-3999
Facsimile: (425) 442-0856
4
Attorneys for Roger A. Picchi
5
6 SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
7 FOR THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA
8
9
In the matter of the claim of Roger A. Picchi, an Case No.
10 individual, )
11 Claimant, )
12 vs. ) RECEIVED
1.3 Contra Costa County; and DOES 1 through 10, ) AM 151V
inclusive, )
14 )
Defendants. ) CLERK BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
15 ..20NT A CC�TA Co.
,_ _.
16
Roger A. Picchi ("Picchi") hereby presents his claim to Contra Costa County pursuant
17
to section 910 of the California Government Code:
18
1. The name and post office address of Mr. Picchi is as follows:
19
Buchanan Field Airport
20 1500 Sally Ride Drive
Site CH-5
21 . . Concord, CA 94520
22 2. The post office address to which the undersigned desires any response
23 to or notices of this claim to be sent is as follows:
24 Eric L. Laurence
Steinhart & Falconer
25 333 Market Street, 32nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94105-2150
26
27 3. Within the last year, property leased and owned by Mr. Picchi and
2811located at Site CH-5, Buchanan Airfield, 1500 Sally Ride Drive, Concord, CA 94520 has
8/9/94 —1—
F:\-CLIENT-\Q-Z.Lrr\ULTRAMAR\PICCHI.ccc\COMPLAIN.OLD
1 suffered damages to.trees planted by him as a result of the use of an herbicide applied by or
2 on behalf of Contra Costa County on May 18, 1994 and at times following that date. This
3 herbicide is not normally allowed to be used in the State of California without a special
4 permit.
5 4. So far as it is known to Mr. Picchi at the date of filing this claim, he has
6 incurred damages in an amount in excess of$2,753 due to the destruction of trees and plants
7 on his property.
8 5. Contra Costa County and other defendants, including Does 1 through
9 10, whose names are currently unknown, caused said injury and damage.
10 6. At the time of the presentation of this claim, Mr. Picchi claims damages
11 in an amount in excess of$2,753, covering the replacement cost of the trees destroyed on the
12 basis of estimates from his contractors. It may also be necessary to remediate the affected
13 soils at some additional unknown cost.
14 Dated: August _, 1994 STEINHART & FALCONER
15
16 By:
Eric L. Laurence
17 Attorneys for Roger A. Picchi
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
8/9/94 —2—
F:\-CLIENT-\Q-Z.LIT\ULTRAMAR\PICCHI.ccc\COMPLAIN.OLD