Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 08021994 - 2.2 TO: ji�% 'BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Contra C FROM: Phil Batchelor, County Administrator CoSka" z A,�.:., _.�.". •.o County •!�� 4 DATE: July 15, 1994 sT;-ceur '`Ty ,SUBJECT. HEARING ON WHETHER TO MAKE PROPOSITION 171 APPLICABLE IN CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATION: DETERMINE whether to make Proposition 171 applicable in Contra Costa County. BACKGROUND: Proposition 171 was placed on the ballot by the Legislature and was approved by the voters at the special election on November 2, 1993 . Proposition 171 amended the State Constitution to permit the Legislature to authorize counties to allow an individual whose home has been destroyed by a disaster to buy or rebuild their home in another county and take their lower base year value for property tax assessment purposes to the new county and have this lower base year value placed on the new home, rather than having the new home assessed to full market value, as would otherwise be required. This Proposition was placed on the ballot because of the Oakland Hills firestorm of October, 1991, but would also apply to any other disaster that has been declared by the Governor since October 20, 1991 or that occurs in the future. Proposition 171 was not self executing and required legislation to implement the Constitutional provisions . This legislation, AB 382 by Assemblywoman Barbara Lee, has been passed by the Legislature and signed into law by the Governor. The legislation simply allows a board of supervisors to make its provisions effective in a county. This is done to avoid the "unfunded State mandate" issue which would otherwise be raised by the counties . CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: YES SIGNATURE: 1J_RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE —� APPROVE OTHER ACTION OF BOARD ONAuSt + APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER X 199,12 The'.liearing was opened; a-ll:..persons desiring to speak were heard; the hearing was closed. The Board DETERMINED to make Proposition 171 applicable in Contra Costa County, and DIRECTED County Counsel to prepare the necessary ordinance and return it to the Board for introduction on August 9, 1994 . (See Addendum for list of speakers) VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE UNANIMOUS(ABSENT ) AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN AYESI I I 1112 IV NOES: -I , V AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD ABSENT: ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. ATTESTED g Au ust 2 , 1994 Contact: PHIL BATCHELOR.CLERK OF THE BOARD OF cc: See Page 4 SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR BY 1f-/-0, DEPUTY �m , -2- In order to make Proposition 171/AB 382 applicable in a county, a board . of supervisors would have to adopt an ordinance that authorizes the transfer of the base year value of real property that is located within another county to comparable replacement property of equal or lesser value that is located within the adopting county. AB 382 requires that the ordinance be adopted, after consultation with affected local agencies located within the boundaries of the county. "Consultation" is defined in AB 382 as " . . .a noticed hearing, that is conducted by a board of supervisors concerning the adoption of an ordinance described in subdivision (a) and with respect to which all affected local agencies within the boundaries of the county are provided with reasonable notice of the time and the place of the hearing and a reasonable opportunity to appear and participate. " The required hearing is listed on the Board' s agenda for August 2 , 1994 on the Determination Calendar. All cities, school districts, special districts and the County Superintendent of Schools have been advised in writing of the hearing and have been furnished a copy of this staff report. In addition, a mailing list of interested and affected individuals has been established and each of them has also been advised of the hearing. and furnished a copy of this report. Proposition 171, as implemented by AB 382 (Chapter 72 , Statutes of 1994 ) does all of the following: • Authorizes a board of supervisors, after consultation with affected local agencies located within the boundaries of the county, to adopt an ordinance that authorizes the transfer of the base year`. value of real property that is located within another county in this state and has been substantially damaged or destroyed by a disaster, to comparable replacement property of equal or lesser value, including land, that is located within the adopting county and has been acquired or newly constructed as a replacement for the damaged or destroyed property within three years after the damage or destruction of the original property. • Defines for purposes of this legislation how "base year value" is to be defined. • Defines the terms "affected local agency" , "comparable replacement property" , "consultation" , "disaster" , "equal or lesser value" , "original property" , "owner or owners" , "replacement property" , and "substantially damaged or destroyed" . • Specifies that any taxes levied on the replacement property prior to the filing of a claim and any allowable annual adjustments thereto, shall be canceled or refunded to the claimant to the extent that taxes exceed the amount that would be due when determined on the basis of the adjusted new base year value. • Appears to be retroactive to the date the comparable replacement property was acquired or newly constructed in regard to any property damaged or destroyed by a disaster on or after October 20, 1991 and therefore could affect property taxes paid or assessed during the current and past three fiscal years . Attached is a copy of a brief survey conducted by the Auditor- Controller in an effort to determine the type of impact the implementation of Proposition 171 would have on property tax revenues in Contra Costa County. As Mr. Corcoran emphasizes, this is a very small sample of eight homeowners where staff was able to. identify the property in Alameda County which was sold, the base year value of that property and the base year value of the -3- replacement property in Contra Costa County. The Auditor- Controller' s conclusion is that all taxing jurisdictions would together lose approximately $2, 650 per household, assuming these very limited results were to hold true on average for all homeowners who chose to take advantage of Proposition 171, if it were to be made applicable in this County. Interestingly enough, of course, because of the current manner in which the property tax is distributed, the State of California becomes the single biggest loser if Proposition 171 is implemented in any county. While the schools receive the majority of the property tax and would, therefore, stand to lose the most from the implementation of Proposition 171, any loss in their property tax receipts must be made up by the Legislature in order to keep the schools whole in term of property tax revenue. Therefore, if this information is accurate, and assuming the County receives about 12% of the property tax revenue, the County' s loss would be $318 per household per year, growing at the 2% per year limit on the growth of the base property tax as long as the ownership does not change. The real issue here becomes how many households are likely to be eligible to take advantage of Proposition 171 in the future and how many will do so by moving their residence from another county into Contra Costa County if Proposition 171 were made effective in Contra Costa County. In addition, since the Proposition applies to all future Governor- declared disasters, there is an open-ended potential liability into the future. We assume Proposition 171 applies to circumstances like the Orange County and Malibu fires in 1993, the Northridge earthquake in 1994 and various other fires, floods, riots, and earthquakes which have occurred since 1991 or will occur in the future. If 100 households in this County were to take advantage of the Proposition, the total property tax loss would be $265,000 per year; the County' s share would be $31,800 per year. If 1000 households were to take advantage of the Proposition, the total property tax loss would be $2, 650,000 per year; the County' s share would be $318,000 . One factor which limits the exposure of taxing jurisdictions is that the replacement property must be acquired or newly constructed within three years after the damage or destruction of the original property. For instance, we assume that the exposure of the County and other taxing jurisdictions to new claims relating to the Oakland firestorm would end on or about October 20, 1994, three years after the Oakland firestorm. Replacement property which was acquired or newly constructed in this County after that date would not qualify for the transfer of the base year value. It is likely, however, that taxing jurisdictions would have an initial multi-year impact from implementing Proposition 171 since it does appear to be retroactive to the date the replacement property was acquired or newly constructed. If, for instance, a family which lost its home in the Oakland firestorm rebuilt almost immediately in Contra Costa County and has been paying higher property taxes since 1992, the family would be entitled to a refund of the difference between what they paid and what they would have been required to pay pursuant to Proposition 171 . This could easily be two or three times the average annual savings of $2, 650 to the family. We would recommend that the Board of Supervisors proceed as follows : 1 . Receive a staff report from the County Administrator, based on the above analysis . 2 . Raise any questions Board members may have. 3 . Open the public hearing and hear from any taxing jurisdictions or citizens who wish to address the Board on this issue. -4- 4 . Close the public hearing and determine what action to take. If the Board determines to make Proposition 171 applicable in Contra Costa County, the Board . should direct the County Counsel' to prepare the necessary Ordinance and return it to the Board for introduction on August 9, 1994 and then for adoption on August 16 , 1994 . If the Board does not wish to make Proposition 171 applicable in Contra Costa County, no action is required. cc: County Administrator Auditor-Controller Assessor Treasurer-Tax Collector County Counsel 1. 1 August 2, 1994 Agenda Item 2 .2. A D D E N D U M The following persons spoke on whether to make Proposition 171 applicable in Contra Costa County: Anna Maria Galdier, 6517 Dena Street, Oakland; Dana Sketchley, 2595 Mt. Diablo Scenic Drive, Diablo; Laurence P. Corbett, 81 Southwind Circle, Richmond; Jack Frankel, 500 The Glade, Orinda; Jean Dillenberger, 727 Gelston Place, E1 Cerrito; John Dillenberger, 727 Gelston Place, E1 Cerrito; George Swartz, 110 Peaceful Lane, Lafayette; Laura M. Ritchey, 2115 Cactus Court, #1, Walnut Creek; and John Wolfe, Executive Director, Contra Costa Taxpayers Association, 810 Main Street, Martinez. All persons desiring to speak on this matter were heard. Office .of COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER Contra Costa County ' Martinez, ,California June 7, 1994 TO: Supervisor Bishop, District III FROM: Kenneth J. Corcoran, Auditor-Controller SUBJECT: Implementation of Proposition 171 Phil Batchelor indicated you were interested in the impact implementation of Proposition 171 would have on our County. As you know, Prop 171 would allow victims of certain disasters (e.g. , the Oakland firestorm) to transfer their base property tax value to a new home in another county. We understand that 17 property owners who were affected by the Oakland firestorm have contacted the CAO concerning Prop 171. We have listed these property' owners on the attached schedule. You will note that in 8 of the 17 cases we were able to track their former Alameda County base year values with their current assessed values on their new homes in Contra Costa County.. However, in 9 of the 17 cases, the Alameda County Assessor was unable to find property listed. on the tax roll under the name .we had; presumably, the properties are listed in the name of a trust, a partnership, a corporation, etc. From the attached schedule, you will note that we are estimating that, on average, each of the 17 homeowners would save $2,650 per year in property taxes by virtue of Prop 171. Conversely, the County General Fund, the Library and all the districts that provide service to the area in which the property is located would, collectively, lose a like amount on each property. Please keep in mind that the estimates noted above (and on the attachment) are based on a ver .small , and not necessarily representative, sample. Actual results would most likely vary considerably. Finally, we have no way to project how many homeowners might ultimately avail themselves of Prop 171. Please call me at 646-2181 if I can be of further assistance. KJC:dh AC94-53 c: Phil- Batchelor - John Bi asotti c/C. L. Van Marten CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Board Members RECEIVED JUN 814gd i OFFICE OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR, Estimated Impact of AB 382 Implementation of Prop. 171 Base Value Assessee Location Alameda Contra Costa Jane V. Moffatt Orinda $42,200 $635,000 Martha Whiteway Walnut Creek 41,700 193,585 * Mary Graney Walnut Creek * Shirley Barshay Walnut Creek William W. Ritchey Walnut Creek 43,000 62,302 * Thomas & Rosalie Caldecott Walnut Creek Aldo Galletti Walnut Creek 51,900 289,782 * Susan Wood Walnut Creek Edward &Ida Accacian Walnut Creek 40,500 185,590 * Jack Frankel Orinda * Bob Sommers Danville * Anr 4,Mada Galdieri Oakland? * H. Donald Grant Moraga Gianfranco & Helen Delfanti Walnut Creek 76,700 554,370 William F. Arnold Walnut Creek 52,900 170,635 Loraine Ghillarducchi Danville 48,600 425,850 * Gretchen Kunitz Orinda TOTALS $397,500 $2,517,114 Average Alameda Base Values 49,688 Average Contra Costa Base Values 314,639 Net Average Change in Assessed Valuation 264,952 Homeowners Claiming the Reappraisal 17 Estimated Total Change in Assessed Valuation $4,504,180 1%Tak..Loss per Year $45,042 Estimated Average Tax Loss per Affected Household $2,650 * Alameda County values are not available at this time. AB382.XLS 6/7/94 4:33 PM a t AMENDED IN SENATE APRIL 4, 1994 AMENDED IN SENATE MARCH 2, 1994 i AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY JANUARY 27, 1994 Y t AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 20, 1993 CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE-1993-94 REGULAR SESSION ASSEMBLY .BILL No. 382 introduced'by Assembly"Member Lee (Principal;coaLthor• Senator: Petrls), (Coauthors: Assembly rNlembers Archie-Hudson, Cortese, Karnette, Moore, and Solis).. (Coauthors: Senators Boatwright, Torres, .arid Watson) February.9, 1993 I An .act:to add.:Section 69.3- to the Revenue and Taxation Code, relating to taxation, and declaring the urgency thereof, to take effect immediately. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST` AB 382, as amended, Lee. Property taxation: transfer, of base year value:,substantially damaged or destroyed property. Existing provisions of the California Constitution that were approved by the voters at the November 2. 1993, special election authorize the Legislature to authorize counties to adopt an ordinance allowing the transfer of the property tax `tel base year value of property in another county in the}state that ` has been substantiall dama ed or destroyed by a disaster, as provided, to comparable replacement property, of equal or i lesser value, that is located in the adopting county and is ( acquired or newly constructed within 3 years of the damage- to, or destruction of, the original property. E _ This bill would implement this constitutional grant of 3 j 95 80 z , r ' g AB 382 — 2 — legislative -- 2 — legislative authority. t This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute. 'dote: 2/3. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. i State-mandated local program: no. i The people of the State of California do enact as follows: 1 SECTION 1. Section 69.3 is added to the Revenue and 2 Taxation Code, to read: 3 69.3. (a) (.1) Notwithstanding any other provision 4 of law, pursuant to the .authority of paragraph (3) -of 5 subdivision e of Section 2 of Article XIII A of the 6`` California -Constitution, a .county board of supervisors 7 erdept an errd � e ryi�k affeeted 8':r aeieies le=af-ed tie eta; �,,,,h 9 the transfer , after consultation .with affected local 10 agencies located within the boundaries of the county, 11 .may adopt an ordinance that authorizes the transfer, 12 subject to the conditions and limitations of this section, of 13 the base year value of real property that is located within 14 another county in this state and has been substantially 15 damaged or destroyed by a disaster to comparable 16'-; <' placement-property of equal or lesser value, including 17 land, that is located within the adopting county and has 18 been acquired or newly constructed as a replacement for 19 the damaged or destroyed.property within three years 24.. ,after the damage ,or destruction of the original property. 2� ' prr• ees,ef t-hiSseeti r ., e ,leek. gene, fne ans fttty ei#y; `peed 2 w j 23 distriet, aeemtft nit! eallege,distiet thftt 24 ate,aeftttal rmee ist of eA Yttlereffi preper-ty t-a* 25...-. -"ttes= 26 (2) The base year value of .the original property shall I 27 . be the base year, value. .of the original property as 28 determined. in accordance with Section 110.1, with the R 29 adjustments permitted by subdivision (b) of Section 2 of 30 Article XIII A of : the California Constitution and 31 subdivision subdivision (f) of Section .110.1, determined 32 as .of the date immediately prior to the date that the y 1 95 110 � E - 3 — AB 382 1 original property was substantially damaged or 2 destroyed. The base year value of the original property 3 shall also include . any inflation factor adjustments 4 permitted by subdivision (f) of Section 110.1 for the 5 period subsequent to the date of the substantial damage 6 to„or destruction of; the original property and up to the { 7 date the replacement property is acquired or newly 8 constructed.”-The,base year or years used to compute the 9 base year value of the original property shall be deemed 10 to be.the base year or years of any property"to which that 11 base year value is transferred pursuant to this section. 12 e of e 13 lesser, ".i": eetns e-1111ing"'fts"Elefitted 14 .Tu-T = subdivisi {-g+ of Seetien 694 15 t}as -a . easy .fie of tie ffiere Otaft the applieet 16 speeded ift +&5 4 subsite {-g} 17 of Seetion 69.5 18 {4} -Disast-erf-'I shall la,�-e the same as set fer-th t 19 ift h +3} Of StIbEIMS +e} of Seetion 69. 20 �ehave 21 the sage as set fertk. ift paragraph {-1} 0f 22 &u of Seetieit 69: 23 (b) For purposes of this section: ti '24" (1) "Affected local agency" means any city, special 25 " district,-school district, or community`college district-that 26 receives an annual allocation of ad valorem property tax 27 revenues. 28 (2) "Comparable replacement property" means a 29 replacement.property that has a full cash value of equal 30 or lesser value as defined in paragraph (5).- 31 (3) "Consultation" means a noticed hearing, _that is 32 conducted by a county board of supervisors concerning 33 the adoption of an ordinance described in subdivision (a) 34 and with respect to which all affected local agencies 35 within the boundaries of the county are provided with 36 reasonable notice of the time and the place of the hearing- t. earing-. 37 and a reasonable opportunity to appear and participate. 38 (4) "Disaster" means a major misfortune or calamity 39 in. an area subsequently proclaimed by the Governor to 40 be in a state of disaster as a result of the misfortune or 95 130 AB 382 — 4 — n 1 calamity:. 2 . (5) "Equal or lesser value" means that the amount of 3 the ifull cash value of a replacement property does not 4' exceed one of.the following: 5 -(A)-..One hundred five percent of the amount of the 6. full cash value of the original property if the replacement 7 property,is purchased or newly constructed within the 8''�first year'fWkwing the date of the damage or destruction 1 9 of the,,,orignal property. (B) One hundred ten percent of the amount ofthe full 1k#,cash value,of the original property if the replacement 1Z. -q ert is urchased or, newl constructed within the 1?. 1n y p� y 13.:.4second:year following the date of the damage or 14 .'destruction of the original property. If 15 , (.C) One hundred fifteen percent of the amount of the 16; full cash .value of-the original property if the replacement .17ro ert is purchased or newYl constructed within the 1� In Y In �i 18. :third year following the date of the damage or 19 destruction of the originalproperty. 20 ; For the purposes of this paragraph, if the replacement ' 21, property is, in pant., ,purchased and, in .part, newly 22 constructed; the date . the ";replacement property is. 23. purchased or newly .constructed" .is the date of the `j 24 purchase or.the date of completion of-new construction, whichever:is-later.: For- ur oses of thisparagraph,, "full p In ,; �i 26,;., cash.value.of;the:original property shall be the amount 27 of its full cash value immediately prior to its substantial I, 28 damage or destruction; as determined by the county 29 assessor of the county in .which the property is located: 30 (6) "Original,pr..operty7 means. a building, structure, 31 or other shelter constituting. a place of abode, whether I k 32_ ,.real property or personal,:property, that is owned and jj 33. occupied by a claimant.as: his or her principal place of b, r, 34;- residence, and any land owned by the claimant on which V 35 the building, structure, or other shelter is situated, that 36 has been substantially damaged or destroyed by a 37 disaster, as declared by the Governor. For purposes of 38 . this. paragraph, land constituting a part of original 39 property includes-only, .that area of reasonable size that is 40 used as:a,;site, for, a residence, and "land owned by the fi 1 - 5 — AB 382 1 claimant" includes land for which the claimant either 2 holds a leasehold interest described in subdivision (c) of 3 Section 61 or a land purchase contract. For purposes of 4 this paragraph,.each unit.of a multiunit dwelling shall be 5 considered a .separate original property. 6 (7) "Owner or owpers", means an, individual or 7 individuals, but. does. not,include .any firm, partnership, 8 association; corporation, company; other. legal entity or 9 organization of any kind. 10 (8) "Replacement property" . means a . building, 11 structure, : or other shelter, or other personal property, 12 that is owned.and, occupied by a claimant as his.or.her 13 principal place of residence,. and any.land owned by the 14 claimant.. on which the building, structure, or other 15 shelter is situated. For purposes of this paragraph, land 16 constituting a part .of the . land replacement dwelling 17 includes only that area of reasonable size that is used as 18 the site for .a residence, and "land owned by the 19 claimant" includes land for which the claimant either 20 holdss a leasehold interest described in subdivision (c) of 21 Section 61 or a land purchase contract. For purposes of 22 this paragraph each_unit of a multiunit dwelling shall be t 23 considered a separate replacement dwelling. - 24 (9) "Substantially damaged or destroyed" means 25 property,that sustains physical damage amounting.more 26 to than 50 percent.ofits full cash value immediately prior 27 to the disaster. Damage includes a diminution of value in 28 the value ofproperty as a result.of restricted access to the 29 property .where the:.restricted access was caused by the 30 disaster and is permanent in nature. 31 (c) ! At the time.the base year value of the substantially 32 damaged or destroyed property is transferred pursuant . Ij 33 to an. ordinance adopted under this section, the 34 substantially 'damaged or destroyed property shall be 35 reassessed at its full cash value.. However, the 36 substantially damaged or destroyed property shall retain 37 its base year value notwithstanding that transfer. If the 38 owner or owners of substantially damaged or destroyed '39 property receive property tax relief under this section, 40 that property shall not be eligible for property tax relief 95 160 1 AB 382 — 6 — >i ij ` 1 under subdivision (c) of Section 70 in the event of its j 2 reconstruction. ' 3 (d) Only the owner or owners of the property that has 4 'been substantially damaged or destroyed ; whether- ene 5 e - ffterIe �r , other 6 entities, e - may receive AL property tax relief under an ordinance adopted pursuant j .8 to this section. Relief -under an ordinance adopted i 9 pursuant to this section shall be granted to an owner or 10,:4owners of a substantially damaged or destroyed property 11{ obtaining title t6 comparable replacement property. The 12 ' acquisition'of ari ownership interest in a legal entity that, 13' directly. or indirectly, owns real property - is not an 14 acquisition of' .comparable replacement property for 15 purposes of this section. 16 (e) +1+ A claim for relief under an ordinance 17 adopted pursuant tol this section shall be filed with the 18 assessor of the county in which the replacement property 19 is located in accordance with procedures - and 20 requirements as prescribed by the board. 21 +2*..The'beams =_ t,_eg __---- per-suant to the 22 of the A d.... Stra .: D,. ed Aet j 23 t-k 8} of -1 24 of weft -S- of Wide -2, of the G n t Cede) to 25 itftplenfte this „-eti6ft: 27 3 these rfitil the date erte 28- .. -ter the e,dftte of this seerlvrr the adeptieft 29 .6f, iftitiftl -_o_='_a t_e__. shall- 46P purer of these 30 , be' deems: � erfrerr-geftey 31 -. fe-:the:. e f 'Ehe R i 32,1-; .�health, ai�r& safety, welftire. Those 33 : 'procedures-and requirements that are prescribed by the Y ' 34 boardursuant to -this shall, to the extent not p . . . 35 � 'inconsistent with this section, be similar to those 36 procedures and requirements established with respect to j 37 Section 69.5. 38 (f) Any taxes. that were levied, on. the replacement 39 . property prior to the filing ofa claim on the basis of the f 40.,,replacement .property's new base year value, and any i - 7 — AB 382 :a 1 allowable annual adjustments thereto, shall be canceled 2 or refunded to the claimant to the extent that taxes 3 exceed the amount that would be due when determined 4 on the basis of the adjusted new base year value. 5 (g) This section shall apply to any comparable 6 replacement property of equal or lesser value that is . 7 acquired or newly constructed as a replacement for 8. property that has been substantially damaged or 9 destroyed by a disaster occurring on.or after October 20, 10 1991, and to the determination of base year values for the 11 1991-92 fiscal year and each fiscal year-thereafter. 12 �g} 13 .(h) It is the intent of the Legislature in enacting this 14 section that the scope and amount of, the tax relief 15 provided under an ordinance adopted pursuant to this 16 section not exceed the scope and amount of tax relief E 17 provided under Section 69.5 as that section read on 18 November 2, 1993. 19 SEC. 2. This act is an urgency statute necessary for 20 the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, 21 or safetywithin the meaning of Article IV of the g 22 Constitution and shall go into immediate effect. The facts 23 constituting the necessity are: 24 In-order to ensure that disaster victims who have lost 25 or 'suffered heavy damage to their homes are provided 26 with an opportunity for essential relief as soon as possible, 27 it is necessary that this act take effect immediately. O w 3 x 95 190 DATE: Z REgUEST TO SPEAK FORM (THREE (3) MINUTE LIMIT) Complete this form and place it in the box near the speakers' rostrum before addressing the Board. / NAME:" n`rwv �,�[ A6A10N � -meg ADDRESS: .:�� ' (_ �i° � t I CITY: 0//,-P, L� I am speaking formyself OR organization: Check one: (NAME OF ORGANI7-\TION) I wish to speak on Agenda Item # ? r 2 -Tri-f 17 My comments will be: general for against I wish to speak on the subject of I do not wish to speak but leave these comments for the Board to consider. DATE: REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM /�- (THREE .(3) MINUTE-LIMIT) ( �1 ' Complete this form and place it in the box near the speakers' rostrum before addressin the Board. NAME: �1" !� _ PHONE: S31 lY Z g ADDREss: 2s-9,5- /ilef 11-2, ,���c CITY: a I am speaking formyself OR organization: Check one: (NAME OF ORGANIZATION) I wish to speak on Agenda Item # My comments will be: general for against I wish to speak on the subject of _Z& CE z -i 7/ I do not wish to speak but leave these comments for the Board to consider. DATE: 12, REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM (THREE (3) MINUTE LIMIT) ' Complete this form and place it in the box near the speakers' rostrum before addressing the Board. NAME: _ LRV T'F;ftce �� 00-,C� dt PHONE: 0 ADDRESS: i'' J Oil-6i) yy,\ " Cv1`C1e CITY: �.4C.�i c( N k I am speaking formyself V/ OR organization: (NAME OF ORGANIZATION) Check one: I wish to speak on Agenda Item # My comments will be: general for V'*' against I wish to speak on the subject of [-I I do not wish to speak but leave these comments for the Board to consider. DATE: REguEST TO SPEAK FORM (THREE (3) MINUTE LIMIT) Complete this form and place it in the box near the speakers' rostrum before addressing j�the /Board. NAME: rT7c FRA 7 ,f PHONE: � !' ADDRESS: CITY: �-- = I am speaking formyself OR organization: NAME OF ORGAN 1l.-\l'IOti) Check one: I wish to speak on Agenda Item # My comments will be: general for '. against I wish to speak on the subject of ��f�-'�- I do not wish to speak but leave these comments for the Board to consider. DATE: REQUEST TO SPEAK F° ORM (THREE (3) MINUTE:LIMIT). Complete this form and place it in the box near the speakers' rostrum before addressing the Board. NAME:- JF-,9l4 �+ LLC �3£►�C��tZ PHONE: S-(b -.5'A$A04�� ADDRESS: -7z-? 1( ) - L A r✓ CITY: E L- C Et2R t l-U I am speaking formyself OR organization: Check one: (NAME OF ORGAN 17iT1ON) I wish to speak on Agenda Item # Z My comments will be: general _Z for against I wish to speak on the subject of I do not wish to speak but leave these comments for the Board to consider. DATE: REgumT TO SPEAK FORM (THREE (3) MINUTE LIMIT) , lv Complete this form and place it in the box near the speakers' rostrum before addressing the Board. NAME: b�nM i I ( -Q "'� b r e r PHONE: — So" ? l ADDRESS: 7 a 7 ��.�-v�. �� � crrY: 7�a I am speaking formyself ✓� OR organization: Check one: (NAME OF ORGANI%TION) I wish to speak on Agenda Item # �-+ 2-. My comments will be: general for V`- against I wish to speak on the sub j ect of (k I do not wish to speak but leave these comments for the Board to consider. DATE: REgUEST TO SPEAK FORM (THREE (3) MINUTE LIMIT) Complete this form and place it in the box near the speakers' rostrum before addressin the Bollard. \ l NAME: D IAV L W PHONE. ADDRESS: 'flCITY: I am speaking formyself OR organization: C (NAME OF ORGANIZATION) - I wish to speak on Agenda Item # hec one: My comments will be: general for _ against I wish to speak on the subject of I do not wish to speak but leave these comments for the Board to consider. DATE: REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM (THREE (3) MINUTE LIMIT ® , Complete this form and place it in the box near the speakers' rostrum before addressing the Board. Q NAME: F, .. e r% y PHONE: l ADDRESS:A_/1_570 &� &• 6 tl7�'� I CrrY: Al LIT I am speaking formyself_ OR organization: (NAME OF ORGANIZ-\TION) Check one: I wish to speak on Agenda Item # 2 My comments will be: general for against _ I wish to speak on the subject of -7N, e,e -4 'l I do not wish to speak but leave these comments for the Board to consider. DATE: REguEsT To SPEAK FOS ..(THREE (3) MINUTE LIMIT Complete this form and place it in the box near the speakers' rostrum before addressing the Boarnd.�_ NAME: --O PHONE: 3 ADDRESS: 6;2-0 g.(AA.) CITY: 16g1e`'1,.�F�� I am speaking formyself,. OR- organization: eolspm '&2si A IM9AY6e5 NAME OF ORGANI7Nl'ION) Check one: I wish to speak on Agenda Item # ,2 = Pte, -7t My comments will be: general for against x I wish to speak on the subject of I do not wish to speak but leave these comments for the Board to consider. DATE: ` 2 • REQUEST TO SPEAK '° ORM (THREE (3) MINUTE LIMIT Complete this form and place it in the box near the speakers' rostrum before addressing the Board. NAME: J11� 1_17 Q�E��5 PHON 67/v ADDRESS: S� (� fi k C TL CI1Y: /I I am speaking formyself _; OR organization: c �S (NAME OF ORGANIZATION) Check one: ; I wish to speak on Agenda Item My comments will be: general for against I wish to speak on the subject of I do not wish to speak but leave these comments for the Board to consider. DATE: ©� - 0 REgum , TO SPEAK F° ORM THREE �3�. MINUTE LIMIT . Complete this form and place it in the box near" the speakers' rostrum before addressing the Board. NAME: V �' �✓�.�`� . PHONE: ADDRESS: © GP,E-&N TA G C Q C) P,-r CITY:J)44u�. I am speaking formyself OR organization:' Check one: (NAME OF ORGANIZ-\TION) I wish to speak on Agenda Item # My comments will be:, general for against I wish to speak on the sub j ect of I do not wish to speak but leave these comments for the Board to consider. tG � ( CC42m , WS Q widow Iov-• _ . PROOF OF PUBLICA'01N (2015.5 C.C.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Contra Costa I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years,and not a party to or interested in the above-entitled mater. I am the Principal Legal Clerk of the Contra Costa Times,a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published at 2640 Shadelands Drive in. the City of Walnut Creek, County of Contra Costa,94598. And which newspaper has been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of Contra Costa,State of California, under the date of October 22, 1934.Case Number 19764. The notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpareil), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates,to-wit: ..................................... all in the year of 19. 7... I certify(or declare)under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at W�Inut Cr k, alifornia.(� On thisOnl/�... ay of.�.... . . ... 19 .!. Signature Lesher Communications, Inc. Contra Costa Times P.O. Box 4147 Walnut Creek,CA 94596 (510)935-2525 Proof of Publication of: (attached is a copy of the legal advertisement that published) NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY AILED BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTYWIDE AREA NOTICE is hereby given that on JUL6 TUESDAY,AUGUST 2, 1994 AT 9:00 A.M. IN ROOM 107 of the County Administration Building, comerof Pine and Escobar CLERK BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Streets, Martinez, California, the Contra Costa County Board of Su- CONTRA COSTA CO. pervisors will hold a public hear- ing to consider the following mat- ter: TO DETERMINE WHETHER TO IMPLEMENT PROPOSITION 171 IN CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Pur- suant to Section 1 of Chapter 72 of Statutes of 1994(AB 382),in order to allow property tax relief (Inter Alia)for victims of the Oak- land Fire that have moved to Con- tra Costa County. Date:July 21,1994 PHIL BATCHELOR,Clerk of the Board of Supervisors and County Administrator /s/Ann Cervelli Deputy Clerk Legal CCT 4377 Publish July 23,1994