Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
MINUTES - 07261994 - 1.57
r 1.52 through 1.57 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Adopted this Order on July 26,1994, by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors Smith, Bishop, DeSaulnier, Torlakson and Powers NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None SUBJECT: CORRESPONDENCE Item No. 1 . 52 LETTER dated July 12 , 1994 , from L. Dow, Vice Chair, Citizen United, 2232 Concord Drive, Pittsburg 94565, relating to proposed recycling and transfer stations . ***REFERRED TO DIRECTOR, GROWTH MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, HEALTH SERVICES DIRECTOR, AND COUNTY COUNSEL FOR REPORT ON AUGUST 9, 1994 1 . 53 LETTERS received July 1994 , from Alamo citizens opposing the proposed widening of Stone Valley Road in the Alamo area. ***REFERRED TO PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR 1 . 54 LETTER dated July 13 , 1994 , from A. B. McNabney, Mt . Diablo Audubon Society, P.O. Box 53 , Walnut Creek 94596 , requesting consideration of a Riparian Corridor Policy in Contra Costa County. ***REFERRED TO WATER COMMITTEE AND CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL & WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT 1 . 55 LETTER dated July 14, 1994 , from David R. Frey, 223 Devonshire Court, Pleasant Hill 94523 , relating to Veterans preference credits for county employement . ***REFERRED TO ACTING DIRECTOR OF PERSONNEL TO CHECK WITH OTHER COUNTIES ON THEIR PROCEDURES AND REQUEST COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S OFFICE TO NOTIFY MR. FREY WHEN THIS ITEM IS AGAIN BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS 1 . 56 LETTER dated July 11, 1994 , from C. Purcell , Development Disabilities Council, 2801 Robert H. Miller Drive, Richmond 94806, recommending appointment to the Area Developmental Disabilities Board 5 . ***REFERRED TO INTERNAL OPERATIONS COMMITTEE \1 CORRESPONDENCE - JULY 26, 1994 PAGE 2 1 . 57 LETTER dated July 14 , 1994 , from Bert Heffner, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore 94550, transmitting its first annual "Mitigation Measure" monitoring report required as part of the laboratories 1992 Environmental Impact Reports . ***RECEIVED REPORTS I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Su is rs on the date Shown ATTESTED:7. PHIL BA HE R, Clerk of the oard �of�Supervi ors and County Administrator Oeputy CC: Correspondents County Administrator Health Services Director County Counsel Public Works Director Water Committee Acting Director of Personnel Internal Operations Committee Director, Growth Management and Economic Development Agency Contra Costa County Flood Control & Water Conservation District s7 Laverence Livermore National Laboratory PUBLIC AFFAIRS AREA RELATIONS July 14, 1994 Chairman of the Board of Supervisors REC1V ® Contra Costa County 651 Pine Street JUL 15 mcm Room 206 Martinez,CA 94553 CLERK BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CONTRA COSTA CO. Dear Chairman of the Board of Supervisors: Enclosed you will find the first annual "Mitigation Measure" Monitoring Report, required as part of the Laboratory's 1992 Environmental Impact Report. The report monitors the progress of 66 separate activities which mitigate the environmental effects of continuing operations. All activities have been implemented and include use of reclaimed ground water in place of potable water for irrigation. Please call me at (510) 424-4026 if you have any questions about this report or other activities of the Laboratory. Sincerely, Bert Heffner Manager, Area Relations enclosure: Mitigation Measure Monitoring Report, 1993 BH:sb An Equal Opportunity Employer•University of Califomia 0 P.O.Box 808 Livermore,Califomia 94550•Telephone(415)422-1100•Twx 910-386-8339 UCLLL LVMR AGENDA DATE 7 6 ITEM NO. I• S BACKGROUND NOT AVAILABLE AT THE TIME AGENDA PACKET COMPILED INFORMATION FOR THIS ITEM PREVIOUSLY FURNISHED ORAL REPORT TO BE GIVEN AT BOARD MEETING ERROR IN NUMBERING AGENDA ITEM DELETED 12EPCer DOCUMENTS ON FILE WITH CLERK �,TY op: tot �, UCRL AR 116y79 ,�q�5 c-1 t. L $+ L �, �,� < , ,•s, c a u �, - O• -a' - i r Y- err t 1+ ,i. + y 1868 }- 4: i t -. _` 5 .,l t - J _4 University of California ,,� rt y J .F 2 r i 'r r f. Q. ri •,t- t. r •r 1 - .t•. r- - �.'+ ' s - 's i r 7 . c. P r 1993 ANNUAL REPORT _ 'f t ✓ ^ l - - `a IVI ITzI '' --NON :MONITORING P:ROG RAM i :� s for Lawrence Livermore National,Laboratory ' ' '. G f t 's. ,.• It r _ - f'1 .',. 'r' - v.G'�• .i•, ::._ 4 .T . x > r - _• r ; �i _ I[�. y tom: i t { s -�t V k �t. It -t t 7 C nV L S t b ,.taJ >. G :F J h Y ..,. March.1994 { 4 f z T ,+e, a,. +, c - - - - �{ 1. { s r. 1 + _ y '[�. 1 1 K ICY. a. s 1 = ti 's S }- a 11�. _ -r _ r[ r a G .4 •y . ` �. Za. ' r 1 1�S j' - n 5 1' f Yt_ - r !-.- V S -S'' J 'i- -t -_T . 1. DISCLAIMER This document was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor the University of California nor any of their employees,makes any warranty,express or implied,or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy,completeness,or usefulness of any information,apparatus, product,or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product,process,or service by trade name,trademark,manufacturer,or otherwise,does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or the University of California. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or the University of California,and shall not be used for advertising or product endorsement purposes. Work performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract W-7405-ENG-48. UCRL-AR-116179 StT X op C v� If J o z � z � a Y r '►r ri I868 ` University of California 1993 ANNUAL REPORT MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM for Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Constance DeGrange, Program Manager March 1994 Mitigation Monitoring Program Contents Introduction.................................................................................................................................. 1 Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures .......................................... 1 Typesof Mitigation Measures ............................................................................................. 2 Mitigation Monitoring Program Responsibilities............................................................. 2 Process for Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting ........................................................... 3 Status of Mitigation Measures ............................................................................................. 4 List of Figures Figure 1. Annual cycle for implementing and monitoring mitigation measures ............. 3 Figure 2. Implementing project-related mitigation measures ............................................. 4 Figure 3. Implementing service level-related mitigation measures.................................... 5 Figure 4. Implementing administrative-related mitigation measures ............................... 5 List of Tables Table 1. Mitigation measures summary.................................................................................. 6 Table 2. Project-related mitigation measures ....................................................................... 11 Table 3. Service level-related mitigation measures ............................................................. 22 Table 4. Administrative-related mitigation measures ........................................................ 27 Appendices Appendix A. Buildings and Modifications Designed or Constructed in 1993 Appendix B. Construction Contract Provisions Appendix C. Site 300 Endangered Species Program Appendix D. Water Conservation Program Appendix E. Transportation System Management Program Appendix F. Blast Noise Forecasting Program at Site 300 Appendix G. Waste Minimization Program iii 1993 Annual Report Introduction On November 20,1992,the Regents of the • Collecting analytical information University of California certified the Final measuring and verifying the success of Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental mitigation measures in reducing Impact Report(EIS/EIR)for the Continued potential environmental impacts, Operation of Lawrence Livermore National • Maintaining flexibility to revise Laboratory and Sandia National Laboratories, mitigation measures when appropriate Livermore(SCH90030847). In doing so,the to meet the goal of reducing or Regents committed Lawrence Livermore National eliminating potential environmental Laboratory(LLNL)to carry out the measures impacts, proposed by the EIS/EIR to mitigate the significant Reporting annually to the LLNL environmental impacts associated with the Director and UC Office of the proposed action,continued operations of LLNL President on the issues and progress and Sandia. In accordance with the California relating to implementing the Environmental Quality Act(CEQA),a program for mitigation measures over the near monitoring and reporting on the implementation of term(5 to 10 years)of LLNL operation, these mitigation measures was also adopted. and Although the EIS/EIR analyzed the potential Providing to the public,upon request, environmental effects of continued operation of the annual reports on the both LLNL and the adjacent Sandia National implementation of mitigation Laboratory,Livermore,CEQA requirements apply measures at LLNL. only to LLNL,which is managed for the This first annual report documents LLNL's Department of Energy(DOE)by the University of compliance with the EIS/EIR mitigation measures California,a state agency. during the preceding year,from November 20, The overall objectives for the Mitigation 1992 to September 30,1993. Future annual reports Monitoring Program at LLNL as described in the will cover the LLNL fiscal year from October 1 to EIS/EIR include: the following September 30. • Providing assurance with supporting documentation that mitigation measures are implemented at LLNL, Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures The EIS/EIR identified significant and or eliminate twelve of these impacts as identified in significant and unavoidable impacts associated with the EIS/EIR. For example,impacts to prehistoric the proposed action for continued operation of resources(Impact 4.1.1)are unlikely to result from LLNL for the near term (5 to 10 years). CEQA continued operation of LLNL. Nonetheless,LLNL requires that significant impacts be mitigated to requires employees and contractors to report any less than significant levels(unless compelling evidence of cultural resources unearthed during economic,social,or other conditions make excavation and to take actions to minimize further mitigation not feasible). Mitigation measures were disturbance,including halting construction until an developed for all significant impacts,and archaeologist can assess the resources at the implementation of these mitigation measures is construction site. If necessary after review,the expected to reduce potentially significant impacts archaeologist could recommend additional to less than significant levels. Significant and mitigation measures in accordance with CEQA unavoidable impacts,however,are those guidelines to protect identified prehistoric and significant impacts that cannot be mitigated to a historic cultural resources. less than significant level. Cumulative impacts were identified in the While less than significant impacts do not EIS/EIR that address regional impacts such as require mitigation measures,LLNL elected to population growth or the potential increased implement mitigation measures to further reduce demand for housing in the Livermore Valley area. 1 Mitigation Monitoring Program Mitigation of these impacts is beyond the authority track project impacts. The first digit"4"identifies of UC and has been identified as such. the corresponding section of the Final EIS/EIR. The As we gain experience in actual second digit"2"is.coded to identify the specific implementation of these measures,some changes LLNL site or cumulative impacts,*that is, may be warranted. Some flexibility is reserved, 1 = LLNL Livermore site therefore,to modify and improve mitigation 2=LLNL Site 300 measures in response to actual program or project 4=Cumulative impacts experience. Any modifications,however,would The third digit"2"provides a sequential have to be consistent with CEQA requirements. numbering of impacts within the section and site. Thus,Impact 4.2.2 would be an impact discussed in the EIS/EIR section 5.1.4 pertaining to Prehistoric Types of Mitigation Measures and Historic Cultural Resources,at LLNL Site 300, and would be the second such impact listed. Each To assist in tracking implementation, mitigation measure is numbered to correspond to monitoring,and progress reporting,the mitigation the impact it addresses as it was numbered in the measures identified in the EIS/EIR are separated EIS/EIR. The mitigation measure for Impact 4.2.2 into three general categories: would therefore be Mitigation Measure 4.2.2. • Measures related to the implementation of specific projects, • Measures related to administrative Mitigation Monitoring Program actions,independent of specific Responsibilities projects,and • Measures related to maintaining The LLNL Director has overall responsibility for adequate service levels. implementing mitigation measures associated with Project-Specific Mitigation Measures the operations of LLNL. This responsibility includes reviewing the progress in implementing mitigation These mitigation measures are associated with measures. programs and projects. They must be considered The Associate Director for Plant Operations during program or project planning,design,and supports those persons directly responsible for construction/execution phases. implementing the mitigation measures. The Administrative Mitigation Measures support organizations within the Plant Operations Directorate(e.g.,Plant Engineering,Hazards These mitigation measures are generally Control Department,Environmental Protection independent of proposed program-or project- Department,and the Quality Assurance Office) related activities. They may be required by general develop implementation plans,provide information growth or by necessary maintenance of LLNL on mitigation measures,verify that mitigation infrastructure. measures are implemented at the appropriate times, Service Level Mitigation Measures ensure that there is a quality assurance review of the implementation process,and prepare the annual Some proposed programs or projects could report. result in additional demand for specific services Persons responsible for mitigating significant onsite or offsite,or both. Mitigation measures impacts will secure programmatic funding, associated with services such as water,fuels,or implement the mitigation measures related to their sewage disposal would be initiated when an activities,and report on the implementation. For existing baseline service level is expected to be example,mitigation measures that are related to a exceeded. project are implemented by the project managers. In some rases,both project-related and service The Assurance Review Office(ARO)is responsible level-related mitigations may be triggered by the for auditing the progress of the Mitigation same proposed program or project. Monitoring Program,which includes reviewing the Numbering System implementation of mitigation measures. Mitigation measures were numbered for *The number 3 in the second digit location was used in consistency and ease of reference,using a system of the EIS/EIR to identify impacts and measures at three numbers separated by decimals(e.g.,4.2.2)to Sandia. Sandia is not addressed in this report. See the EIS/EIR for additional information. 2 1993 Annual Report An overview of the annual cycle for guidance for the implementation of mitigation implementing and monitoring mitigation measures measures. The implementing organization at LLNL is presented in Figure 1. prepares a specific plan for each activity,based on the generic plans. Development of the plan also establishes a basis for later verification that the Process for Mitigation Monitoring mitigation measures were implemented properly. and Reporting Using these activity-specific plans and other appropriate guidance,the various program The Mitigation Monitoring Program at LLNL assurance offices assist individual program/project established processes to ensure that mitigation managers implementing mitigation measures. measures identified in the EIS/ElR are included in Specifically,the plan identifies what activities will program or project planning and execution,that trigger required mitigation measures,who will be the status of these measures is monitored by responsible for implementing the measures,when responsible persons,and that a progress report the measures will be implemented,and how summarizing the implementation of mitigation frequently progress on the measures will be measures is prepared annually. reported. Completion of plans by program/project Plans managers is,therefore,the first step in The Plant Operations Directorate prepares implementing mitigation measures in a proposed program or project activity. generic plans and other documents to provide UC adopts LLNL Director mitigation funds implementation measures Mitigation measures If necessaryImplementation plans, checklists developed or revised F—ARO audits implementation Measures implemented by Annual Report responsible persons prepared on success of mitigations Responsible persons report on Implementation monitored implementation and verified by support organizations Figure 1. Annual cycle for implementing and monitoring mitigation measures. 3 Mitigation Monitoring Program Verification Service Level-Related Mitigation Measures Subsequent monitoring and verification by the The EIS/EIR identifies several areas where Plant Operations Directorate on the progress of operations will result in additional demand for implementing mitigation measures will be reported services that may exceed the existing capacity for annually. This report will provide an assessment delivery of a particular service. For instance,an of compliance with mitigation commitments by increase in employee population would increase programs or projects. the demand for onsite fire protection services. The planned mitigation for this impact is hiring Auditing additional fire fighters as necessary to maintain an The Assurance Review Office will audit the adequate level of service. Mitigation Monitoring Program. The audit will be For the purposes of monitoring these service completed after this annual report is complete. level mitigations,the following will be identified Any corrective actions identified will be taken in where applicable: 1)the baseline service level, the following year. Status of Mitigation Measures Review proposed Table 1 presents a summary status of all project design mitigation measures addressed in the Mitigation Monitoring Program document that accompanied the EIS/EIR. This table further defines which mitigation Verify consistency measures are project,service level,or with EIS/EIR administrative-related,indicates what part of the I LLNL organization is responsible for each mitigation measure,and provides the status of each I measure. I [environmental onduct site-specific LLNL has implemented all the IIS/EIR I review mitigation measures. Some mitigation measures I were initiated prior to completion and certification of the EIS/EIR. Mitigation measures are I considered"Completed"when implementation processes are in place and implementation is fully I Identify project- specific roject- integrated into routine normal operations. Overall, I sPeCmeas res tion one-third or 20 of the 60 mitigation measures are I considered completed. Of the 25 project-related measures,8 are considered completed. One of the fifteen service level-related measures is considered I completed. Eleven administrative-related Incorporate.into Incorporate into measures out of 26 are considered completed. I project management construction contract Some measures were implemented using I procedures documents interim processes,with formal implementation processes still being developed. These measures I are shown in Table 1 as"Implemented." I Project-Related Mitigation Measures I Project-related mitigation measures identified ____ Verify implementation in the EIS/EIR have been incorporated as of mitigation measures appropriate into each of the projects initiated in FY 1993 in accordance with Figure 2. These projects are listed in Appendix A for the LLNL Livermore site and for Site 300. The status of all project- Figure 2. Implementing project-related related mitigation measures is shown in Table 2. mitigation measures. 4 1993 Annual Report 2)the method to be used to measure the level of service,and,3)the threshold level that must be Establish baseline reached to prompt the implementation of — service levels mitigation measures. For other service level- related mitigations,the current status will be I indicated,and a statement regarding the acceptability of the mitigation status will be I provided. Refer to Figure 3 for a flow diagram of i Monitor service level this process and to Table 3 for the status of all such mitigation measures. i Administrative-Related Mitigation Measures The EIS/EIR identifies specific actions, I Research threshold independent of future projects,that LLNL must i of service level initiate in order to mitigate certain adverse impacts of continued operation. Such actions include on- I going administrative activities as well as special I one-time projects to collect data,prepare reports, develop a plan of action,or implement a project. I__ Implement mitigation Refer to Figure 4 for a flow diagram of the process measure for implementing mitigation measures related to administrative activities and to Table 4 for the status of these measures. Figure 3. Implementing service level-related mitigation measures. LSpecial studiesJ Initiatives and One-time ro ects action plans P 1 Funding 114�7 Implementation by responsible persons Service Project- level related process actions process Figure 4. Implementing administrative-related mitigation measures. 5 Mitigation Monitoring Program a A N 9 A 9 A 9 v A wZ c c G c C G C c c ++ E E E E E E E E E E E Z Z Z Z E E E E E E E ad Od u u d E Z LOX c c c lb c cc 0 Vv c E u u cn c °' c °' c c '� CEc Q Z G. G. pCS cp� ccos c� c d pGpyy v-4 e4 e4 N N c c r.7 a �. '� cn cn W W c. c E3 x x x Vs d $ x x d x x x x x x x x x cE, C9 ;�• cc .. d v v "a � C > ori d + Od 'C V uu10 .0 o E A 3 � dIwo � d Q Q d Q c WrQ c a ' d Z Z w o y c :° .. U c a c C 3 'r. d aci d m rr N rl . ti N eV eV d A r fn C ~ CA C a.r w W W w E c OD 7r M O d1 v d A r d A W O O O O R c CCD •� G.�+ ts.Qi E V E'° a d a ocw 0.0 a u e u c n oG Qa a Qa a v u u i H o � 2 m a O 1 lk v 6r 0�0 rl M w H H H c� N N h 0 ti 0 6 1993 Annual Report c�z ALn m 'C 'o •II 'v d d d w b M 'o d d d d d w d aCi w v aCi d d d d aCi aGi "' E E E E � � � � E E E o 0 o G. O, LL E E E E V U U E E E e4 .d. t c c c c c c a w [ '� 'c •C T Cc aE, z d d c c c c c c c 40 Z .a '� Z E ° •� E c E c E E E E E E E w w w w �'vc ° c c ° c° c od cd ow ov od cd >'c �+ W + + W c eo o W o to o a0 o eD c eD � ami _.d. G � C CC�wa a Awa wa a. cn� ink ink ink ink z d Md x x x x x x x x x x 6 � i0 X X X X g d •� L V A v c A40 CD CD 15 CD E c .� Cc w ` A w en A w m E m c d .� c Q, o c m o o E c 05to ° •' Q •� m •v m •• s '9 w w 40 dff ` G CL A A •� fs go Cc •0 c m �° C c C as v U-a w Z w a:� U U U •v .� Z A .. c 0 r-i Z A d W N N %0 N N n n n n n A n n 7 Mitigation Monitoring Program U a. a M c a a, M c. M M c a, a a, oc � Z O. O G O =Ira C O C = 0 =° E .j E M 00 O O W O W O O V O wa, c. wa c, wcQ, wc�. c�, wc�,. wa.� ink wR�., �n cn cin' c, A x x x x 'E In � a Qd x x x x x x x x x x x x x c, C: > a d '° _ .« A > iz Y O > an C yIV V w C CD N N ay�p v Q V = p S+ O c - 3 d ° c N c Q c w c QC 0 CD d a d > a°. .°1, p m 0. ° V 03 •s.. ° m m ar w C d 0 7 d O �+ d ° b in Ci � r. Z (�M, W d1 V w w w t_ V Z qJ �dr V G .. = 1 O x a z o cw a a > 3 A A A N N h ll N rl h n aC H 8 1993 Annual Report -v V "a -v •v 'E d d d d '� d 'E 'E Q w w w w w w w w w w 6 6 °6' 6 6 £ 6 Z d v d d d a6i d d d u u u u u u v E g E E E E 6 6 8 c eo to eo to eo to w to eo eo eo eo eo eo eo eo w c c c c c c c c c c L c c c c c c C 'C -C -C -C -C -C -C -C -C 'C ..0 -C 'C 'C -C 'C 'C ° w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w N C w w w w w w G w w w w w w w w w w ..j c w C Z C c c C w c c c c w G c c c c c Z G 2 -eD -00 -°D -50 -;b6 ey eD eD oo 00 N 'vc 'eo 00 00 'oo '00 C C C r. r., c ti c �-. cw 6 w w w w w w40oo w w w w w w w w w w 10 H r.. r., ++ C a, r. r.. +.r a. r+ v°r A A A A A A rw. A lCQ A A A -� eC0 A A A A 00 c. c. c. a a, c. w c, r. cw r. r, a c x x x x x x x x x x x x x E4 x x x ax �0 i0 . O. d C y .Q > w w a. N 00 �' N •� •� ~ .O w A w w c v A eo v .° A 3 m 6 A 3 o 9 d w o o A N v y 2 $ w 3 u 3 S d N ° N d a a ^ 0 c m e w a aV+ to a c > d o cc 51, v� O F A > C > U V F a s ;3 :S C4 Ow 3 U w'v z L �Lw V w O Q OJ Oa0 N v-i N Vf •o, r n 0 ti H ro " " r r rr H N r C4 PI N /V N !J N N !V e� aC 00 0o Go p r+ .-+ N r Q e� r n n e-, T" V" 9 Mitigation Monitoring Program �o d d z z w w d S a a c. a. a n a, E E E E E E E E c eo eo „ eo c c v c Y O-1 1 c c d c Y d d d Y y e p G �°r A A •7 � L C/ d •G 4 .0 Y .G Y ow LL m Cr cn ch 0 W d x x x x a � � d .a � a a >' •v "> � a"+ 4 c cn A 3 d 3 d •[ c ° d S g M d OD Y N N d N ai 3 •� •°•• e A •c 3 100, _= o+ d A Y A a H :r � Y A .sr •rr r .r L• Sc s ++ 00 z s d CD d 3 ° o ° ° tVN N +� tri tef e+f t+f Q 10 1993 Annual Report d 00 0 ytot,� A�•w p «� A bD�t � Vi : W•ra � �+ a d'av wGoG d d ��OG C6 c� °1 _ A O ty} Q p d w•r 'CS A ed'9;.4 � A �"• G �.p G G:: G a' v O r �'+', O d d dao, oc , d t vo 3 w G veGoTC7on «Gd °v o %$ :fid voo .d. y A y •m A A p p r y'a4,Q W O « a i p ea0 O A 9 w .,�> , d r O+ „'""„ A V>d 43ss 3.3Q °� to V G� Gr `.0" A�$ d p`+.+ S' {„"+ d 120 W v OD z a °°, �O d d �3 w Q..9WO A to woo O� C G G "0V. O z � '� dt,.�•-� m r Q"-.Gr.. G � d J Z o v o G �-o„ 3 3 G �' JaGv w000 •ap« G ��.ov 'Sym%° c to y � RS A ri A � � rn O� �+• a A.... y �" a G y m� N r yf d 3 ^v o.r ee G VOd d... e'e�+a_ d V m Q 2 4 .43 � � do :: a �s �+•6Yr � VOG' � o ° w �U aAat°+t'' m v "� CyeiapiG O�lSa : a > $ rnoa°fiGW �' A,>'y > a4V GAG 6'G v � dA LP a a ee r. �' ¢" .� d a� o � aAi'� G y G G A�❑ :: ci M.rN.4.G y > d •- � 11 F w � �4G:a� ~ Mitigation Monitoring program c y •cs : Q OZ r ey or > +�•` p 07 00 0 DA •� 'y� bD p C � tL�+ G ;;r. ppm to C 3 y d cn VO4 DA Ow Oi r y G Or A rim "ypmc. G;� la 5oD.,rL. "� V � vdfi�r3r�y. �, G v � oy� yG Co �V� yyd dd F e$ �+V r-a 9 G't3 V r VA c. xj ,, Hca► �d �- yd n w ° asg °: ••�' •� A.� v •tyC" d o � aoid d3 � G � ea un d rn ea w 96.. to 4w y G m A ai*Ov O"C, ad+ A : .0 Gro G O i �•v '+ o�'�1 �. � G d p A�•C3 Q d O A p '�' A �w M S? pd►V 4 Y 1'.. �r'� OD O Z C OBD d i1. .d r+ i> ro, dD y•C 'G O •d; 91 bb G y p S G od' v 4w. v p• tL G.+ sv. SY o• ell e� Al 0 a wO � v o J•o w V M od ppAa r M M d ad. A � c � 3 JA o •o,� y �. A ¢y r OC v d w A H 12 54. 1993 Annual Report d a $ aA+d E •e0 v E d d� Z Z Z Z c V w e0 O G O c X G Ca Q V v o ° d.E•° w O o e 0 A M d G d' C eh epi ^ A C,a Z d p E A d w r O .w. a •°w 0 0 $c W� °' ° d W y W W �•y W ai '- �O V C pId vai Z 0 oai d ��. 0.0 dEC 'o Aydc.Z vaA c � °c o m w w to ed ca od,� d v" a'.Z] d d s a w a.eo.. c A c o p eo d C O1 8 a E O C �' > G O^ m aU O ^j " E A Z °+ 'm A �+ Z I...0 p p (A-� C ~w w C Id'C O „•";,c C d >, a :.a a �; i4 V'Z V d A V�.' w O V V d �'.0 d-a= C ee �•C.'� d m �' a w to 'C d a,E � �° o;.s A aZ o ct a d •C .�.0 d � LO aacid > d � � i°� ac+ d'a E .. G 0. 0 � G.a Id y d .0.0'C d w p'C d w.G'C'C A d G. 7 p A d'CS ep p �, �0 �•••d r"� r e0 " a A r. d•� 00 i m E C.O G Q pp- G r. y C64 a Z � S^ 0 0 ;r'3 y $ " p U $ ...G :°d p O 'C V'3 d V a y :�. �' c W a .. c .+.Q= a .. c y C a ., C .. E d r. C O e0 w. a A w d d R w•.+ a d ee w A C O O V O O E w t c'm >, E eo�•v .• E eo�s,a a E ao a >'M d .o v a, d 0 M p,' A d p,'y'C rl S p,• �0 O e0 d d ` A d E o v d E s w ,, d E 3 ►d. c d Em'sZZv Q y C �•C d d��• w A !0 d _ �' �.� d E r !0 C d O.t o by w e0 d ti -p s ...0 en ri C'Q o I= N d G.Z p '" G.,? E :: m a e� eM rr a. a G V d:' �'! � �. O V;... N E a .5 a ti C d C w 13 Mitigation Monitoring Program d A y� �a O g •OAo Vy F d H o u m G a OW T1. A ' o m A V w -k G d d o ,n GA d 3 top—;z y oD10 y �r d o.�y 'ti a a d d d w �" A'� "� •� i G i d O G Y�r t i d b b uA R m t �yr+" Z'>w w A G .{'+ A G:.Q A« .dG �+y Wo P. dm,, Oo G 'r�'pp� O G� GGY. .'..,p V G � A•� G s.'3 V'�� A'�O A � �..o pmQ S3 � d �.� S"dC ,�•a+W«� �W" A..A..•�>+3 >C. +�+ em0 �•y O G M W A v i w G i r G m G 'b '� NO A oo U eW d G m o 0,0 d d•d ^j m to p e•; s+ d w G >'+O.+.�" i m d .+ "� ,G f d• S G 0,0 m d G G. '" O ?..0 a'C. ,p w.. ... 5'. d'p �00 St .: °w' ` G o .--0 0,�A o .+ .a"�► of w m A d eGa d v D C A.-. >•. „ tom . O.,, " .G tS m e l d m w A' ;� y`�'� r a d m N O d drl A 7+y, d C a A...'C w w .- G y'Q >+y " y '° m y A ,' MA O 1' d d'e'D A m u. A w z .1 q�S « m 7 m 0 5 ' >�,; m � p tycvv G D Ga � o Ord Cv.°,o i �.5 � �Oa Cyd > ya"y*C � dAv, eo G d cv a � `oo m't' v c °''�':� omi,.�t `+�,°% y �D d G' "0 v �' •�C7� m 3?,G y o d ddGwie ,p. G^�G S. �Q � d rd. 0 w"0 m d d :3� m� V �'.S�+ o'O i•� '00 G ,.m+y A� LM�A G'G p �+•A G�" ifl� .+ O►�.+'CS d;;; +,y �% d !�+m en V++ v G •.. G O G r Cfl d'r to .G d t +" O m G �' y"l A G V > A•.� "'"¢.,� �'"C w"'7' d d +��' d '„C O t 2.5�Qa,,,, r 7 A �"►... air (J Gi° G ,cL°D �� � oeo a'A , eG° G-s d m «R Gv, m O CY a« d yV rV .� yd.A ¢. aw p.m.. d G O %D .� G••+ dy v y+d '4 A .�r� O Q m A d C� ,G %S d`+' C6 d r (,�Lid A�'Sod�v•�.+ ,�j °..' ►�'d � � .+ w OG0, AOd to Cop e4 o Aw°e.,� d b 40 to bo dd = c > d I: to d'd •+ CD G `� BE d w G 0. �, w� � ey %L" .g..+•i'�, ism+r'�'r ;f"o a 'C w3 Co A A A �, mLw d .G .�, m "� d i�" u G . r d ,. « «i0 Nww.m.. rd. V �UVaone yva ,. 3 •. •• a CL G v O N A.010 d .. dd N SAA � 14 2993 Annual Report M O. 3 a G w a a a•'' O y m �.r m waya ZC Vs G y b e La.v� °r' O•"p a , a m� G � �3•> m �� cn� d.r C4 a ' w y C s ;, �a •:: �a ° � � GGw�� eco v�G w A Ol •rA tp a a w� .^S "Cf a w w o'' Oi V � d•(i O an ,ori CDS.+ 3 .� m.O A G O 'iii A•'3 0, Vi m N $ aQ. .. AA v Aper y ¢ :•y > :. O A a w G AA V �. O w V A Wer .G A A .Ar i '.3 ACC A•0 w A A y w p "!1 r' A CD 0 yy ° W. {°d is ov `r0d r,pZ' vaa > :° w � 0 4 p, � oDG At s des°c� cw $ o oepa o 't+ o � ;air N0 " � cn C4S all •Ov A 3: % C: qw m A•u �G O•t3 A P. F+ 7� M r V� "°'^y �' A A A C as ppO A•OCd"C1"aC �0 CD G A a C"'r r A C y O+ ,a N , w 7' ael m �wa 'G a.r w i a QO + ' •Q'A Q•O p t N G .Ggi « �,i G aha >.w �p G 05, �i G 0a C 3 r3 op C w req .N.+�a Gyp d «'e3 y CC a y W:Cy a > a r a ��,' S :� +'�+"'' G �� 7.,ay..C W r � a„Y1� �w �''.•� C a CyC4� p NAaayy $ Avm 0 W •✓ �•r•G y.pG °'.G'C " OBD• �S A 4'.p C 3 N, Y� � CLA ci 'urs c o R ° �, � .� � ° dna 25 '" o pO lk b A H �O , Mitigation Monitoring program Y a G !. H � �•qf 'O _ y p a� a G w � o tQ N y i a w d�d .ar � d o d •" M rC 1M •J W w d Yom c y a baa •�"„ SZ ww O"Op a ri' ate' '^' a'CO O 4' r Lia Z1. p Off• ,p fit'„O Q p a �•,OYr� '�� p :S w y r .fir G 4 tlf'"� �'4 '✓ w w p i a 0 a V 0 �' a p W .w«s r w rp r N ✓ a y,�y p i+ w °i :p • O (i+ O A w n N "f7 O m ado 3 Iz d % � �iOw3•y v v y app AA a 9��Ji a w a0f w a �" x p A r �.TSr r O p w Aa tot� y 3 3 p '3 N W r G G w Sa oD "O A A A.Y+ C w Z a + U d 2S O 2 a G 'tA 1„+ !�'. Lam' ¢ 00 V c..m. O. p to 'v, � r-mNw '0 ; sis►' � x °.�.� wvo ., ,rL"i ye S V w O O tQ''+ C. aw X 4r Of,. V a A a o G w S►y a«0 p �n •.3 p .�. a s... �+ r'S '•,+ 7 m 8i w E"' w ..vi w ,y r W!' C, a 5y O N d� O aoarp H W 16 . 1993 Annual R�°rt c � o a y y A � M ~ i a � ad d wa • ami Z � A{. G d m O'✓ ea d CD Ao co N o � a a F � w✓G G r A a A ✓ �. lid v w L°o Coy o '`� m tis a a• A •� .w Vo p. CA '•d e; a 3 •� y � av yy u�,ma �aoG%A � p r w� O.a yp C i Q, •.d ��N`w+`p �O i G ` a .�w a S •p, m s.•CS A N a p 0"•� A q o �i� � o � Od'3u 00 ppp yq.�A Roa3 d•C A•C 0.� C C p.ui- ✓ O O a 9� to,A A v {.A p y.1% to 16 Ij .tjwt' p s 04a +0"4 A i�•, am O r- a A•O7m+ yR'4 " a A'd 0 O o'1a.eS a w. a , 000• a G Z..' a r a w r v o y �;,•'v ppv ."'r'r °• �' aa i a a i'G OµV n a.w O Gjy a'MG G O O S ppi� °' i,EaG-"a+y v a+ � a w'a d �. C� w G v o � w a��y ,'••'r a'C` o•G a s w •d• ,,. G y � wocvo .:93!•yy T ::v � �� p.a.•es'Oom�00 s •esoWO s � e � g� aob ♦ 0g .d N m : A G Atb C0 w G S C 'awe. i fl'� N i y p v G a, F v e'��,,.v o a ptw coo v d�¢ � v aayo•ll coR2;a °dtoie h•3AA C4 Z.0 ai wu i 0 C4 'D a -A.'6 ea c- N G n program r °a Mitigat'0n M�itori g G °A 3 eo yw aG, v�p.•kr Q �• •O G "4 w Sr av� G. 110 �+'d w r•N it i Orn O w . e2 y � ~ y � k a d >. o Q' d � co lu y ��''a •3'd y{d� ,a,, .or. � o noa Gcr d T' G�•� ��w d o� s � °«' G s,.t� A•4 m G G y T U d tl 4 o •O,0. 9 o O d O �p' .di. y"G +%, yt TO I y d d= w O d A .O "6 o A 0Ow .G 0r ,.r y d G � ap a y A A ai r d G•pWOW tiara d A ,,. 3 � �+ Ci .� � o R�4a a °! oa'6oL° .: -fid o .G.'4 � vvod a•cS�i��C9 e6Za °' o oma ;: Lw -o „dn. G ��« o "A45> dA0.1i 'wy �w Z `° VAwa. Ad01yOprr Ad«• " oICA;T' r o y G O-W a 0 3 w Cy v� �, d m ... bD O.r .► ay d « d O w"!f y A i W G+r+Z.~+L+ p� us A 3 U A y O 3+• O ►. .�. � :+ Y m q ZiA — z a r p.« . oleo�•C A d .a. � d p. y N o- o•d a.A+ $ T v •f�pi A .�. „p. d W'ti U y Q en m fY "•O w b4 0.;" .. A .r.,. O a.. a G y w bG 3 d «W G G r A w y G G 'o �Q a O Gam' �+ t a.Ap + y a o "`-•'y+ 0 A 'CU Gy ow0 t3 eya .z 3 o o m d y `°^ti a'o o �r « v^ti A A y •6 Z.a A m p,,. a N y bD«"d y a a o qty�' A y i A SL o G v G a o T3 y V,3„+, w 0, us d .+ 1+ G.�+�y Z 0.0 *0 v G%In y Ow O a 0 0. O w l C d A :i�D..- .0 w O —wo E'i.ry3: 0 KG '. .tyvQAa � � A �.'� � c�y � � > O w"S q r'7P, to 4.0 .0A A Z.. Z o.. .�.� Ty,�+r A oDG �•w fl" +•yG„•O �� A C aGi Gw� tte � a C p w VOW d O d G m � O �" d� O .y+ O%' G ++ � y•r v� � � �" d•O.. pp V A A 7►s'1 d 3 '3 N i 3 w a G G w m '�� 10 d 0 T a r T Qd`x"'yfl t+ �0 « + �s+ a rF" a� oF'" �" • m.p ,,3wy� �, ��•o � a « .AtdU 'ya � Jr.¢ W + O mG G }� �+may+w a r„ p,.•. o pO�i tit i s O .� O w 7 W Q ?r �i •ui r. O' Ayp �la+� � .wAd'00Ao w H � 18 1g9,AnOat Report G G O a G c ,a�.� m d"' •d�G a 'OG ✓ a ++�d ✓ °'i °' ad * ° G ::A a9 aao ticv a Oa`� � � a ...•.G a, � r a w i .� to a A A �, O m ♦ r y✓ d 0 �. .ar Ma ✓ Q. af. ' VA Q3 .°♦�v f►u �7i A � •d. ✓Gtow . o dsd aV IS as0Ga .a a a fs 06 06 .aG E Cyd !e � v d♦ � >r^ i s m goo` a a A v �' a� a s ✓ a aw � mvA.O °� �' d « � SSS ° ,; T+ .�, a �,•ey yy q G G 4•yG Cp A da AO pa G GvNS a G t to i sc .+ fir •GCj a °.s« .� � 6 � ✓ as-0 d to d Nto s v�� D•d y A "' t'si �.♦ G ajyd °' i�'aG a�Gy � oA'� dp�ro �yG yip��. 0 a °, sdM 3tnE gy °'e+d o•� `° 3 � °i O'xO °'` v Ga syw �.� G«� pp'p �+ ? p y� j�Ja i� w'a ✓,� "a .♦ G G .a A A V s to w a i". ir+•>� a Oto N O• m N 0-6 O ♦y A G y O r ✓ t^ O.r �p O y ���� G✓GG G,as � a>isy°i vm enA� oao a $7♦" � '" s vA R � C• °' �� yrs ,,,� Gaa y $ .� `�', ��•d A > a ✓p,r A A �6 ✓ A v.S a ✓ iY'$j•�' t� v >+A " ✓ m v G i� a � ♦ yt .r w a � ✓ G �+ r a•4 a'd d A ° a Ay`• a i�+' pr •'�j y °epw O 0'y a A > ✓ y v box) � a rc3v. �+ a•S % °v ie ver , S enav ? G .� t'i � Gvyt •$d� a �!e�'Q,•; m.D a aG Ay R v �� .oDv fl'o G o: a � o tow G rl v i 3yw d �•�"o G' G d^3•y� � a,+O rGa a•ay� ��� ✓ o .G a �Wi d•�a... s �•a Gr„•�v� o d �'i K3 m y o' a.. �•a G •a ✓.♦ ,. ,.. v G a v o wt c O s• N a .r A G .Gr ✓ .r > a a G o G wG w e (� r a d•d N,©.L,'T♦ G a G A. Gds ° Vi �+ .+d' v a '' v im Q OD 1g C1 dp d ?OCL ✓ N, N A ✓ 9 C4 d e A r' N Monitoring program TriitiSa�°n R m w R N a „ O N ia�v 1 i w •�� Av L� � � . a � sz• v` x C"'y... �,.L'.. R O O i „"A G �.•G'U '�T �+�}'1:�" U rR* m m r A 'dri "d` ~m NIA 46 Q 06 fs -S-0, Thr y �Q,• f" O U pp mor EU d•d''.Of.� A C.O r a+ CL m r �+ L• .p L' .O A i m A m A V i '^}•+•' d m W i eTp C It a m A✓ a A fie% G,r Z } ddtwo 'd �+ oi mvU (6Wi A to A w '� O _�+ „o.s'd /TN d Z •� O O d w d•'. rs: �' . G O d"� GY v0•v d "F U rJ G �''�rj 3 O t/3 A��i+ �f0 t U d y d•� 01 OtlD 0�v w d'` O✓... d _" R •w r is Op % dC G O O d d d m i '' O G Mt r O w (. dM 6s: U .o �, T d �+ O apd 0A Awl W'ri c « wo Lya'� ' L° �r m U a d•o d „° v R A 01 A ass t;° O•r. A w t„ ~ d4GLrt i+•�+CA •� m R 9 �� �i �A� sap syiv m v Mid OC$ yS QN A u �+� 30• eP Gd cf rS � .V'. r A V d y w✓ � OD 0+ ea O N• �; O r G C p dfi si u � yr; M '0 r. •d' dap O'tn A.f+ Dp d �o �a m y' d y G�R••.`�.. R d A'4 •A��+'w �+O:r A Nay w A d .�."'► d w y �' M d O w y 0-6) N O O O s: 'v G to "4 Op d y A G •j+ A la:- 4. `way O :^s 0".5:,. Si 0 w 7 . d ;; G N• oy ; o� ... p a F 20 1993 *ttlwa IRp*i k « � $ � VA % 00 _ � $ ca0 CA® 0'21 k - # k YA i 1 � % k � k � 21 � � � program c ts anon M°nzt0rin8 M'sg « XS 3: and y G r. w a, G c: A as m $ oo A wVA pvr O a a W ��.O.r.s ►ccs =% Oai °who z-0Atia Cpm ppwO+rAit �" V wr W y d .'�. X61 A> ?+c.a p , L."a O. ~ .%r CD cwl) •m O w �.' G%� V r� A �,w^, �i G O �; � a � .a T 0"m Q� °i � v N y d :►�,� a �u y v A'S�'ee!+yc� Oe„'r` d"'� OI A`n'y d yw� a a� �A p��`+� V „G� •6� � �j p � ++�y NJ a � f.. 0p� a;wv o W ya R �sjO� t G a E+ 7+ a xId y dc3M00 a�o'a�n 'c° > w O yGt p, C m ��� t^a ��.a� A d, O.rp1'w:% YO .7 ''iar �i r eb V O'SS w O .✓V i•0'y A i'.G+�" •� '� ebb.•^'+ s � C w MR.a y g„t �+"" COs a W, {. fY N a y A•O r d d � 4+� aAix d p w - a e6 Ate+ A W A C s m.r d w w •,a,,, G a'CI G tf 13 Gi ewr4 "» • a ��,Li A y v...y s'y p w'a.Tj,a � o '."„ �"' A a d OdZc �'� «: m � v.. o � vo � Ay� ay.t9C: �G a « A .a► w• a y Q x••"'^:� M .�.d G C ¢.,A.•y a A �. Sr'.�0 �.Or A vyf'�.5' �' '�•r r a V�.C� ly6.a.�i F. G��} '.7•C"i S,� r+ � A•'� �•("� 3 C+ O V+p f�Y •� CJ n CY v� a �`p a d a 3 a *• a G c A40 � O G S;i w v N c Z,4 w tyC y c�y' is rk C A e°ie v v y�.� y' �•�� p y AAs A G C ai >a C�6 A .+ O' a"C w• v G� ry1- a o �m C'�„ G eOn m a o p ••Ots •� `nd °' o to C� spa U r1 x O w v11 N ra O i eC u E'n 22 19g3 Annual RepOrt 4 ' 11 .Q G y Ly G Agp, i O p gj A y iy W cc SGc °°1m � � 33oC,� d a o r„ v a, a y,�" o•� E, t •�d p�d` '�' O m V y T.. .Aft y V w '4 to-,y r.�w" ✓ J"AA V O G .G ,F° rfG yo.ow :: ° R.y s3E dd ° OR L° a °v G*�""+ ✓d3 A ��ct r o� o m w3 d AoV vok to Ll G L A °i vd S i V. *r-G.L�r ti'•'r4 G A mw d � Ay.°. y e�riNaye'"a7r aF' 3 � y tOAo Fw Qyy N G,'r", y m � °� d �., •� u A m v sto 0 to Com, �A�py.y toady ? pAA r` dy QAC+ ep"�aLL yaUO+ wd It's to . G e� p d G p 0 .. A �y w "' go 00 `�>'' a•" en ✓ - m O O.A ,.•r" A A a O " i an3 i0+. o y .� v o, �>v i fl+sd. u r Ky y G p > •f p ..'O S+ d.• .4 �•r a'�' o •4 y;: p° L b a y o ° A v :y• d o �3Tp UG p; ooh✓:G p• T7? + c �„ A % �, ° cya r oD yy' G ti r A i w A � w L1+�.�'' V• tl0 w pp L w A r. A O qD � .p �+ 3 '� d ✓O 'a, A y m �;,. d A 5 G y y A d m ey 3 V r N N eo '2' ✓ A cn m d A a ye Or O . tym TT d o aIt0 -6,sr;� y c d 'd' � � �, G'w r:: � a: R p d� tea+ a 0 ,�,,, y�,•°oo �''.gyp w d W. 7 w web p O m,,,y`�" d G : A•"' �j?++�y� d V ps '�'� „O. A rte. . d G�dp°G y G? vxyvG°. d °!12 y •L G G.R G o d '� J eget •. V a� 3 py cy$ :d .�' y ep i". p }` + y- y `+"�3•e3 w ', •�" eo Oi e�,r .+w Fis A Ty A A A eme t31 0. £S v d o r.A 9�+•A~r '�''O d °: u�i �, �•G i �fey '� LL A•S'r y Cw O eA.. m• > 'S i. A w Aw N d d i� a d.O O sk w IA ✓ y A '�'; .r ✓ Os '�'r"'� ✓ L W pm vd �✓d yG � O yw � d 'Q +� O m 5�. G i A .d O ' ✓ fw •� � a i f"C� �" A OD 'a' !;� d •S`► G iyyy OL ,. 23 VA E" d ng proqraot. •a� % A o l�onit0ri y ✓� o v;, Tl y 0 w I► •d `�i I m .: d .�.r y .a G,✓,, d ,a Io 3pSd3 d •�ryddvo '' 3 ..."G� Gy ' dG�o 40 ds • lu .r �. A I -a 0•yr 3 G A A G A•yG•�A�' .G T 'y1' ✓ t" G Q`A•G.{r O A.p ,,, �" r'L� �"',. A • : G •4G �. ydi y v G y i O v y Of. ? v r• y App ', s'G ✓ O 3•'Ryd�jG6G' p+ O .r3 OrAD 3w � y O• e��y G ooOtto Vj"13 .� A Si A w✓� 'OS+ yt.A'AQ' .0 A vt^ Ga� d �" •b O tow�1 S. d N A 10 w Q` dp . 3 d•'" p G y w A`Q v-o Q SOto 0 d .ur� ? •�� .% '� O C` � `+'` 4 7..d r,�+ A y A y'°i G m r� .r.�y 3 d $ d•3 dem-+.�. ? d d oflC�'" y 7C� : d � G ✓ 3 d °' o onis Os I d a G Op G ,{, G v d p W;y a, ✓ +� G A G d d A 'a ••�'d d y d 3 y a+ 4 T G A y i G �" E `" 4• ✓ G r •' A �i" t G d A T •d.r/n ? �+ O pD':� d•+• A p'r' G �' Q d ° V ✓ Q y y � y ✓ "`� Q�` Ii, n"�1r' d N� i d "'` Y�'7 .4 ✓ ✓ ✓.�y 3 a, d ✓ d r d .r ,, d oG•t3 m v ✓ G �" N o d A A d y A d d OC 3 3 G A•d y ¢ G.r a N A A ?+' f✓.% y d t ap A d +' yx.S�.uy3w � i .°r �y {r'+Gdp�'Qi 'y'OAGG 3a' di d3i7y ✓i3y a W m � T. OD p.to Ito `t`6.O mr � GAG rsi �.� +� d ?♦ Gir'A ? s, GQ, G �, .a.r O �° d• � �1A 'a'.r• i d y.p,ri? y y A ?wlr�A •°r d'� a, �'i d 'ys ?a S+ pp v ? ° yO:% 3 o� o •i G d .y d v ;>, m Q Q' en ''A d fY A �'. d a, r �,rA,,.a s y.• d A v v 'lA G G �, G A d n'b to d ,,,aooearA 3 � •off cti °�A ? ? � ✓ GGr•' O ✓G '� No A !. A �. 3 dC .yo i ✓ p• O.r O ✓ .G O y '�rn .0v •,n {IA'' �+. d y ,p � ? ✓A ✓ G `� G d �' A � °r' � y " 7G„a A a,•v °3G'C � ydS m ti A v� yA v•� IrA � O ID 6 ✓ � : 12 d d dOD d yOG Y t i w * y s o s cud 'aG °. v yd '+ ✓A ✓ ✓ �a�''A .Ga G � s to a G;a w � y 30 c► E� ea Z. v d SO e. ? G �+' ✓A .A^ W, ✓A yr d A m o ooh 3 `d+ y i G ✓A3 Q O •r+ i d . A (� + A a A •ayi O Ind yy a' ait C,4 sY"•+ V O Q O r:9A y N O WO V r+d N 2� 1993 Annual Report ° "' � .0:.0 3 s ea � to .r m ►. a.c t � 3 .. b M.0 d .. c d V � Ow m •Z O V p m �. est �.0 p. `� Z G 3 "!7 i 0 w m m ao m w cos to a C db� w v .. � ZJ a V > Cc: c c c c .0 M a A v. a w s!p H >J G�4V1:: 0 a Cd +_y �p p+ _ a a d d d G m q0 z o'm .- d ►V. G Ly, O�tj E 09 d0 OaU sf?• m A pw �d„ ��� 3 go G C cc 7~i v � � T O p 0 0 0 0 0 1A O 4•-M 6p+ OGS pp �+O 0 d V 0 ; •_— pp.0 w > V p C Ic -C G A"C,,, Cic � 4 p >,..". V.V d ;; V m >,o wa+ w A O e! r+ d d V > mc eve wa vo °.?+'" c3 p,oc N ��+, NAAsA > C 'G.� .:+t0 w.,» 4p.+.aw p V �"' +d+ X L d C F V ad d R c c .`' `+L'' w C C 0 V V ao n+ — q esr "' . O 0 w pm o " NN m aofj °' IV vo � °w'dAd Vac o L°�s 'scAo ow „ 'L � '0oio So3dm3 oda a�as4n� to UVVV Or '° a,a,so > �= '0O ccs $ aa cA 0toC = d 3i° oo �n to to ao a to v .. ae Q'w > d' O F. Q 4... v v 3 C4 3 V V V � 40 ao 3a°omoo,� oo '° w �oW to o•"s•.. GGc ci941Go'6 :cp` 0' n.w'S3 � 3 V 9' > V wSL es•v v A V O c "t7 A 'ap 7 d E d ro G >+G ypA C'0 p� A V �`.7s � vo 0 .0 to M.P..Cl d m' Vy C A c no o g'& q 2 e0 c �" E >, m.G +3 3 too 40 W'v ;3 c �cteao aeAo.� $ £_ a,dc e`o.v C.cv ep cn d r C R CL w G G ►•^�� G: c w 3 o w 0 p co $ S. 2 y C dz `ate o 0 A c c �°C c D.`o,o D.0 x R Cid V O a w m:C •vo+� >, aopo ^0i0dc '4 M �" to m � " � Veceee V°aGO—C m G d o mo .. o G i �., to iaaowa'te � �.::� i3 :: ia3 24 3 � 0, 3�.0Oo 3 "w= 7ECL Qrn �.�"CAw °sA �.` 3Cs .�' ellAto V C = � •O V� V w j L c Z o 'd �ss a boci w to to 4i �6 p w O O U) ep y m a to e.J w •f°a vZ r ..r U CK M0 M � dC.) e4 O N 3 V N 41 41 to NA N p•`�+ N ae . 25 ���t��� ° ��«■�� � � � � t � � k® . « � ® 4 . � � � 1993 Annual rworl a +� a d o m°'� � � •O o " e°'ecaiRay+ p.;;y � as dD tot d d ct a � ao° a r• d m a oa•roto:°ddaG+ R Qto IrC' y v, Co w 'S •A _ 4nCIA s w 0— t�6via•"' aAoC cn vw �Vpti6ri ,, %moo-wanvSZ' a A has oDo. S U ..ova °' GrAC � xaoc::� Go ;: v,� ooh•fr. d 0 A d' 5 fe G 0 w o: % d d00 -C, yZ m aN a �'�°'CV -W�..o d� d9 tY w 7+r+ a G e0 w �'A L9 �'N y.L• O� y Q.r.S3� y}N a s a �_° a !i-C i ,� « 0.A F+W 16�F rS��� wd cafi m ea ft .= 0 RWer. y0 N O g" a 0 w .. o `n W � �o �'i a o ev y A - M Oi v •' t a low 4n an y oo Z y ao d � ooh°. �Cd''c�o d °••' o� � � ,ow,u� .nR 7a VA 0. Gva .C~ Nm� a y .. dGad � too G yno3 c S3 ;; m: Aa w w v G a C .. tomo = ea R a oo '0 d RQ'a f y m4 d "s A G a fe v $ N $ . a o d w A � o r„ Oo a'v+ d a w r-� w C'� O p..a y o �'m •. Y+ m .r+ 60 a s •"J v oa a a OD an ' 'e$ tlo i1i•« O .0- S. y A .°• v��+C A '� ��` W °'O ° LU ,aD'� C • C m yf • V i a rA�'"r� O D.y y 6i H Mitigation Monitoring Program � w •a .t o >, tad=y °'Co"w �'+� Ot) p O *" � A •,$ V w,�. V;r to y A� � ...�. cf) A R A O C O A L' �'+ Lt ..V. O 'AW N +'VA US s y+ > .0 .0 B OAC is �+ w A C tr dw..+ an » a+ v.rd too r6' y t d AO t4 •r7 !'?+A w!ri d �.�.y• � O ¢ ..� �r O 2 ti!. "a � � 1�r,L' 'CS Q."C O O bo!Lt w.r �..+ r d O w Q G � ,ar ^f C'O W•� �'.r. O G A G m ��..,, .r� !,. Ota:-. ti+ ..+ N �. A �• '!3 � �.'� O w r GA ,. :; v •% a.da, wyGv�F'vto � ,+oo•� opp.o .G m 0tv "!:t Of A OD p.�. V.C+ yOi •8s•�Ot ra F to O'A'Cf�e� A .0.. «O A w�"O•�"tea'> O O. T+ A••�'+ p to L' w, °i w A G �' �+ a> In w A T+ A O w"ar d `L+w G w -w m O to an ° V. A Ci G G .G Wx G.� S?+ d A+�" ..`n. y. .G A t0 G 4� A O O �'6i r" w.fir' aceta a Cil y A !3 z t5 A G O A o.2 W.0 A w V !1 d M 1A A �d G w o0 vW 4 v d H 28 1993 Annual Report 3 m 3 c c L °' o eo ywdoA e0'osE3 =$ add ae ty c 7 a 'G C F y 7 2 oco'C•O �•C.O NO r.z_,p Od d 0 r A t.o !gyp A tlD ° 61 �0 b •�^ a Y T,� d c.9 Ty ate.•Q t+i > >+wcc >,0Q .cd � °,2smc dcn'Cv� :: c = Co eo A � s v � A-- A m•�,�� v „ s•� �� � v p....�.�,+„,,,,, � A �.V r :: � o'° Ae� •". a, m � 6� cC. AY.p � ;. c�wA,a � E •IImAoo me`3:rA vv A R � � Y YAd � � vr c3 'QW �cx �'wC0= 'Cm � CWCdCCY•P, Ner"o V �+'e0 m y.� Y �"••• d a c O... OD w v R.� A r 00 OOw A L6•^''� c O A m. O A r A O v COF r Y > V 7 A d'm'm'O �• A G da v d w CDG yew d O� 0. p•.. Y d O y.. T V�'a d v C O= S d O Y O A d D 3 +G t '�'C m G'9•fl �o s ai O.O •fl" A", .c �+too „:9 v V c ,c, A'v o a+ a, d c > a •c R^r ap•Q •� m OD d d 0 d G ca '� c > l0,��' 40 GD U r GD V�•r°r .V.L'Q V r�r +"ci y y li y Vi °' �-°a a o c.C•'v a °•v `�_ °=C7 a °•dam 3 d E� -.o= o24d o w3Y �,Zceo Yp0•oOic� Gm6l;� � •da+cn•"'d'c > �Y:c10a a Sc�•a.=.cA oei°oc� aieod €•� °° mv � `n v �o= J oe:c owa mt.o w `c A °° v .ci. �sU° � d N d'� O i 'C 3 7 �. O.0... p,y L`r d c boo,-, ao V > ui= A .O cdd .10. dc �' °' °' o^eoz �, `62% 'amk,vCw °De°DOc °n R � v �rAA°: ° c a0i�.5� m m m �w to d O'C oov H y.c � d•� m O v'c a. Ra, m� � uv... A v v ,� 'v $ 0.V � c v.,., v Sv � ,� S 3` .°.C'� L, C O A +°. ew0 C S 63i A .z.7 C>i w ° O O O A .•C d GOO 6� COU ae daD: GrwswC■ nW r cV ..� C—0 VO V V rr V fl1Up haw >W O E.�. V v 6a d Y A d c ° d 0 V v d .G F 29 o am Mon{tarinS �1tiga�n CA N m d o � w y y 01 p Ofl G W p mr. ✓� O+ G � x' F• ¢" w GS O lo- fa m'" iS o, G�opG is f06'ro to ✓ to SY O ✓ y, O �S.✓iw � � � A✓ +++�•Y` L�,f. G tr G ✓ AACO � co d) :13 SYwO o m wwAy G 'n .. a r� o•Z o % t a as A yww o 'aGv °' y✓G� ���'" ao�° wR.iaaGt'' w� yd4 � `� C� dSd rd C'd�I ✓ 'f E C,f-wz V G a5 A Q r d O A 0� O d� N 30 1g93 Annurt R�P°rt W i r � ✓ Wit}d a wa d •w G >:pwd G y 3 d 3 3 o st s �d o o $ A •• �'a �' d�e des, �N� m � y 1� cw`d � d• � 7a , JD O a d r '4 o-r A'O + A y �'' I w� v . O�w L d �� Av �a Orvrpwaep � : ?" 13 cn oi3•°��� z o�.:�c .� �d �, o�a dox' J� � A arG dee v��s, T v i f 7 ep �+o G i °✓s Sy mA I d O•D M O Ne" a y `� .G d d dG 00 y•r i• E'+ „G,,, �^ i OD A GO .;e O a G cny G d d W.%�it w a i� 'd 9�°Op •fir ay��„ ¢, � A O G' y s' ai„ T '' � d �'� ' •� a �7A 40 B5 Airo adr G A,L � vA.D, r (� o .rGD Ar as .4 Ayu� Ga GNsoy '�, ✓ o .r . o � EMG 'G ° G .d i N A d- G v : o ('.c- o G;�y v a .. 0+ .p G•O y �t G w d a A d� as r 'ti O.a 1e N 7 $ 3.•��, G ys r O r G�✓G �.''ru'. �C� � •SA w G�y•G �� o c O'?C '� `�+ .. ;. 9 oD f's o ✓ '� vo Ow uraN, w V �^ w a v fl• L v ° ee�A a G O' OSr D•r•d u " vii art p. a ofi'G ee ✓ � �„+ r*d"d a A•y"' r 7'd .r G Z' .... r r O• � ,.•ry..T�v G a, �+ � °'•'' G �' oD �.r� y, i a A?� o�•:r �✓•3 V Or O V y ✓ C�'y�m� aaE00 a �ao o� d aN ¢` �w flaGo o a�yap � yQ^c d O Z r o m �+ w a v d t ..A .. p a ,p G r . A d L� a �d :r sty'a•e3 1.0 y g� o y�Nt p•�r �' `� i•N ,a.•9 G d ^'ra N rA a y y s r a .� �i•� d�ee�Ma'�jGa $ 7 .G � Gaat �,1 Wd ;?'� ✓ d �` t• up' m d ii ti+ a Q A O di Z d�Ow 7'S•►�:10, r °✓ ti'w d G drG +"`vsyd ;; A .:wG � vo vN � -;w G G d O' cri m p ✓ oD�v `�rdN d v 'C G,t' w y°r, a it A fl'.. d +' am Ga GNw v : Gypo+ C+Gro' vO a o, 0p✓ {3+ A oa G�O v �Gy" i O s 7f,A-wA4'6ip y �? p••Ay s✓ 'O'' r'{..L.i O�'�"",'w^rl �A Iii ;A 16 d+ yd,i >�' z„ sG, A S .,� y�,ur r•'� a+ S. a i�wia aw y G haw,, �, t3yyu'i4 c tD 10 1 � •s a`d' gat'� c `�'��9a ;y a� 3 .+ A ~l' .0 rNOr � N Mitigation Monitoring Program � d S c c a V V a � y 10 "a c m p � v v° v° ti Ia+ ,y � s � x e � � m m m w�a _ .. c d"vo — M �, oo.0 ,o a.v }+odd ,°, a s 'n"c° a z .C=' ss E 3 0 y c z w"" -Cc d o m a. °� �+ 'w°�a. ece G > :'. b o w a asi� �'vr_ .4 Ey w _� Ea 40 c0 .. of E.° dam.° 3c �a >c °: za : moE+ °"C yco,apG � RM ,1 a•OS m v V •�C V R a v a:: "w �a.w p,a R v y ee X"r.- V �p"r m °J =c> A n s a d e� V.cO o� > a2 a a� :2. s o > c a v '.4,EM E ece " m > a. eaC7 m.c� C.. . E� c ° a a - ^a, 2 �w aaem: •:,�-Cc'� cc° ;; XaE },at t: rv. c0`ncCac°+ a°'i c,E �aenc« -o «.'0 w G Sas ° d.ac a3ow aoa a ° amc� a ma Etc '. p ee m w e`*0.•�.. y C '$ v � r � .0 ®sae� mme/sa+ aa'E � °1 °t >u c. w A ° �+ � .,. a CD �; .. a . 4 a-Z p °' °s 3�.c a `'^' a0.0 aac*�o« a,Q x c � d c a: �' m e >,a e,p ci d« to m W C M 'v y W �'e„ L ego 5 iga... OEer, C.., aEo �M. en a3v'gceo �°' e0A»:vRa a v.ICWQ. ILO �c 10 ch::,c^. M 0.e[e2 a a a°� a �.., mcA.� V 0.o fsl0 R 0 ._,a a a a c ac c c A N a W C L a .3Z mp 19 my +—+ 0. V w..>„ C d r+ Z' V•�• ewe O a s O'C ee 0Fj7 t`Q�+. ro x� +°. w 0.4 c p O .0 om, -d m acs i, -p d A to e0 a _a ro 0 W Cxx a°oywm � a a«a aR ccZ o-� MV 0 c:.� e en'cs '� E w c m`:: E a c c w 4y is 2.2 C w•v c"E'°I° �" ,cs u;•.-,. a �, ,quo ° NO } H `l 32 1993 Annual Report 7.. � d ."• ++ A ate,'S z G� v o a 0 m A A �+ fAr 57 0ac w o4dc� d R'3 o°fi eye � ° d m d G O w ¢•4+.a �,.� �' e!f m V d _"� i A..� d ti"•r „ a w 3 a 126. tJf V V a C d a y d `° C H .Cr .�+ d'' C ti+s C""w�{ �."':� 0". % p w N.t{ w �•' :. .ra+� a oo � Cd �aaCidd �' st�: dts too'O.S:: p 00 y G'Ow W to IW �"r eD•'•.. O L C'to ea„a. ain ^ACJ'".a.� Vq'� f�Q a A �'j ✓ �r 0"i.L'. v a 2.0-- *r.� -..0 y r 0. tdi 'C war xt,�N"' Q.�S3 r w fr d �' ".�'� .; O A r'"" A ay+ oo �wAx ° Aa,'At3 G In r •+p N i:+ eP. �. �. d M �f'� G � V O 7n V t'+ �.' d �.r "Cx f: " .�/ w r v a w " o � C °'a,yU44 my Ca W ' C d; � a yea C 'addA�j °' `°F"' = A c d �y� Yr > °yr y o L V w alu x w=' a '"E e° N•O y, A y a �+a G A ys i �+ +' 'C= 1:w 'sS Vi :r A j'.'� 'C a a "e3 eu' r.•. N 'O"„�,. O... G x A i R •'�' ."' cn ' `G°"" pip qp G `� p, .a F' ;,+, y ,,.p d C p �y" C `S G"d n *�'Ar :.°r Z ; o O y sY� O• " A co d 4w v eta C °� p o A v 3 „. y.. r fa y O Ofa f3i a Y A O'"" r3 dC eta wo A yo vto to WA an v a •..0 O p o a d nw �,,y " tea 33 H Mitigation Monitoring program V w a O .a c o � oday K •�• wN OW. 0. p G d 1 fog G 3 O > S y>,•d � 'iia o•d ° � W d � eD M o 40 co CID c � ao � w �' v•So: a d OSS u. d A v O� 4'G 3'� N > t+ .�+ w•<y P .► w a .A+ OD d o�i^a" GAo•G w`°V�x.` Od Go w:rs a Ac• aUS Oaa aG qq d ' y c4 ' s Ac twl� G wS rr 0OA O �� d v y app 0.--w 21 G J d G a� •4 ,� A o : A G ^. >G o d`,`L '" 3 a , G 6 A y eoe: G � �:s ,$ d ss'. z ' fir pWs y C �: •V ,�CA a ►+ i y�� w,4.4 1.+ V yd p d .�" Q+ ,O 3 LEy O � Q VA ay w We 5; W a d p C. w r V1 G G DbA 030 "" awo $ 06 „ � o<w % a doA mw �' c d or•da d9 ��'' � ao `6'i� o � .t+ � o a :', aAmm A 0w a 3 ou°,.%a y.s 'Zo °•o G�eap M d ow�L° � a a A'd a � w O > A p ..` A y a ,a R3 pp V G0 ivO� aD Aas1 + � d wap G 902 .G wA V .� % vIS,� O � v o V a � e!� U dV, aow C4 to H r 34 1993 Ann'at F I' r G V. ca T � y � $ w � y � o d�R w � ?+ ,>�,.3 7, a G °°f d.�+• vac+ eD era a R+ : m w ° to yt d o0 G y O• in A o• G C d .n d d .p �' w ¢' G mow• tet' cw fl d ¢ w � v 0dw 04 to Z 3 o� N m d+ G 2C 64 0 Q m d O r d � ?, 35 r N Mitigation Monitoring progra", •ei .10 VA w d � O+ Qac• w V 7 d O d G m +V ~ A A m � G pip m a o O '.1;y' •C d 7'+ry A w V•bpm V'� " .r+ G «S�d�r �.,, S� 3•„V'',. � d �mea`"" �%; � a y � •t3 j m d.'�' � v`v A Q"'"a G•w G � d d � 3 low 4) G•O.. '3 • A O C05 w w G A y•�; S w m � to CIO � G m d to e d �L° X+r, ed+ o6wa' , "� V V � �•�,�w •'ear'A d dj C •�'. t'• � �'7 ¢•r G .�� �. r r.� O.i"'• rr d O Ci d"" w •rO� ��•y,A G m m �"' i •� a w CAW M y"i. d w •G G dy,..�. d.Q ��� .+,.. as G•;j vie v w a'Cc w w .+ C oCA r- COW� -- w to,%N w.-„ w A d rD a O V Or+ go A X a v - -1 - G a 0 " C " a m JJ $ y d a d 40 00 C4 Cid E.n 0 36 1993 Annual Report s e„o r. eon '" q 3 .Q Od -a c=va1 egoa W,q co c.° d A. ° Q eo d— egopa � •Eo q 3 O.'. q tH N•� V1 C � GG� °JE y a`rV q m F e0 d oLw 3'C O�Oma�o me &r W.0 ° = a1 a— c �3.[ s c. � = qE � „ > acc °'G '�+ v � '° a, Q o cq c > b. &. � °v v > qac � ' 0 3 >+ aa1 �w c o L v. w — y... C2, C i Q +�• O a1 m =s 'a.O C C >•a J; c a °oma v - �, > a+ E.sq. d ao ..x .. °� t4 vy L° .. d 9 9 a� = _a'° w=° •s°c� � E °' 'ate°' •° ;c =�-C m eo oq o = q ° qs >+v •a '�' m � :; � Acgrc = E C G a> C q p, E A y > _ � a.'fl Z O in v... V w C G d m'Q d q m E O V W G. O a q a c ODS = O �O,y•.. -eq¢ E aa C q C Q - 0 V ME 0 E: V Cr J) m C'4 V Cr i, Cr V + C o 9)x' 3 v� .. C GSW � .°. •• .G 7 A 5. o ami c v '0 Q. i0 ani .e0 A M 'Ol W w d q �.w i Vin G•� eoc? a c E c _ _"Cc w q vi =° C E c. 5 �—•v q r. = 41 = q v QV = i'rOr d rL 37 Loring program MitiganQn Mori d o .00s 3 a a A � t0 3' •"'A W O G � O C d G .°r+ Gd N yy �, .°r7,f. ATw A�.�• .' aid ec a 3S "a° Ge'e 3�dS A O cA > .Ar t2 S'r' N Gy y 'S+ m w ✓.cry A ;. +�' i. 'S+ G SY A �+ Coll, .G � t." t r d p G oC> v aAoC :: JA -Z, �, a w.p °1a. w d Q � • fG � G a «'a G« « a - ; G dbD G e�at°Ga .. s �G ; ?• 03 « to m�.GOd o es >� oa, o �aw o A,� R� Fp .ate ss• a v.G O O O d A•.".. � � G 9 .�. �~�, O m G . Ov � � aZ y...� �.�°✓ G �!`!3 � V A to O !^..r a .�3�ao.G°d v G A c W 3•�C+ A � k to d �a� � oC i � .�► � 0"� d OV � ►+ i A m U A i CO fs tE ,rn V H 38 yt 1993 Annual Repo i ti ow O A G oD O m O m > a b � y�4 m O.,O.. O• •rte a 0 ¢,O.:+ A a w.Q d � x' 3 � w � �wFr• C A � m ..0+ y O p'�i 0'Q•5eG0 y y•'yam•'. A a o con to �•V � �V G .� a �� A O ��, A Oct r � CD d 7 � A d � � �` ar�► � a ppy� w ODS v C « w ��G. y+ dp.A �+ d' W ODS G andµ c wR a O w V« a >+ �' C m O•a.a to .Or fe'a a y ...O. ay { � y.r 4 }�d � au o!d .1A«AA w VA Gam..,Q,St7 v to 3 i w G a CA fo vs G A O O+ 3 w o a � �+ a .+V-* O ai OA C a MIw 6" ,G.a. Iw A a � t' A.10 �G+f` c G y w o .� •�'!'+ r Q,G a `?moi+ V Q b4 OD ' F'ydo �' �A°'.°a 39 -: 3WA d H Appendix A Buildings and Modifications Designed or Constructed in 1993 Contents Document Evidence for Mitigation Measure No. Livermore Site 1993 Projects .......................................................Multiple measures reported Site 3001993 Projects....................................................................Multiple measures reported low 41. S F_. 7? I �•$:.q %O It71- LLJ I .;ate Ya•'".✓�' � 'n � i� ¢ F _ r 1 � — '.0 - - 2. moi".'`:`-.",'`.,t•a-t r+ ." J ;n C� -•'i u� = Y a+ ` - .�.g�✓r��'.gy . �/ r, _ fi r Lr. .tii�f�' 4 3f.\.1'k, ♦ 3 .: — r :J � T L r � � � � �..� C � � � LL 1 .L 1 1 1 C _ tc IV Q �-_ — ... Z J :!. •f. Cr ~ � - L V'J'. J � :!, :n 'J. u — J .! i i i i m �J. C-C Cl- L b re i Jr_ -{— = jr _ _ .� _ InkA Imtv tz 'kA '.f 'CA 31 77, t _ tz 7:S _ � 1 ra 77. d' CL Interdepartmental letterhead DEFENSE SYSTEMS/NUCLEAR DESIGN PROGRAM Mai!Station L-20 Ext: 3-6806 January 27, 1992 ESH 92-011 TO: Distribution FROM: George H. Miller SUBJECT: 1992 SITE 300 BIOTA POSTER Site 300 contains a number of endangered and sensitive species and their habitat. As employees,we have the privilege and responsibility to protect and preserve these important resources. Over the coming year;use this poster as a constant reminder that the environment is fragile and join me in making a personal and professional commitment to be protective of the Site's natural resources. For more information on Site 300's endangered species,refer to the brochure entitled,Site 300 Endangered Species,How You Can Protect Them (UCRL-TB-107648). Gj2jb�4 a George ler Associate irector Defense Systems/Nuclear Design Attachment Info copies: J. Nuckolls J. I. Davis D. Fisher C. Gatrousis D. Sewell R. Weme L. Woodruff J. Davis,DOE-SAN E. Kehely,DOE-SAN W. Warner,DOE-SAN University of California ® Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory SITE 3 00 SPECIAL- STATUS SPECIES How You Can Protect Them I.a,cmn,r I.i,orinnrc \ata„nal I ah„r,ltnrc n ..tlttil ,ter, fit, ,nu iI C!u,ir, ho1,i1.1t I,a' tw,•rndam,crl',1 ,!`r,ir,: .hl'�,.tn 1,,.1,11;11 '�.. 4.t,t,�r.tniltlLu'a 1. I 'll.u .upp,Irl< II, ,t ild lit, ,p-i,. ,I .pc,w ,on-111: � ,e.►” liar :\:r,'',,ITT i`,1..1:•rr (I.t\idr.t !.t`.u.l .vld rile I'.c:r,,,,•,ir.., ,,.,. Uhrnr iuniCul,tri,ti. l hr I nb i,t„mnu!tr,i t„ n n:,t11x ,prrir�a ,1 their habitat „Bich ,:,t,.J kith t11,-n1,,r.,I,,IT"tf i1, "t II'j,I San Joaquin Large-flowered Kit Fox Fiddleneck y , .�.,. I he tion loayuul kit h,c is Site 300 supports two of only ❑,dill,,'I1nitLll'ILII lair,\'e.'.I three known natural ��'*: '9 night). It can hr,ii,tirn ui,hrd popuiations of the large- ... t henC1111l'11-1,1 1Cs,I1r flUweredfiddleneck. (hese• - '� red(n\and thcCocntr,b� its are near Buildin S fi,mid in .. � ..> . small size l4-a lbs,the size a remote arca(Draney of a houxCat).li,ht iolUr, Canvon)On the west side of 'r dark-tipped tail.and habit thu site.There are four � of rennin:;with the tail other fiddleneck species , N held nut.hchind till' at Site 300,but then are bode. Althou,h the Sdn not rare or endangered. I0,11JUm kit t,,.,ha,not been>ecn nn The rare large-flowered the Site,sr\C;'31 hun,irr,i p„h•nli,ll tiddieneck can IV drrn ha,c Men mapped her,•. distinguished from then,by its deep orange-red,large(about!/2 inch in diarneter)flowers,and smooth-coated seeds. American Burrowing Badger Owl Thr bad,er is,l lo„', l hr>r snt,l l',li;_ht-hnncn o,c!, p1wl'rfUlk-built.uli1lMi li,cntnpl'n,,ra>sl.ln,lhahila[. ,crth Inn,i I,t,c,!ol V.herr the', a>r ahandonrd digin,. It,hea,i r,�und,yuirrrl hurr,:w.a. t' ntarkin,,:rcdi,tincli,r, nc,t,. III, I—I-'tondabout with whirl':hrrk,Mill,t ,1-I I M1111-1 high and,1n•of l,.IT wltitc,tripe tannin,, scrn,aurin,the d,1, i„ the , Irom it.nn,r bark to cntrancr h,[116,i`urnnc. +r the sill+uldr:�,. PROTECTION OF 11 I.til I`,+li,t ,:n,i hta:, ,tn,i I'r,1o:.tl I,t„ 1`l'„lr,1 thr,r,pr,ial- :alt,. - (+ntt.lrtin,Ihr filo;Ina I.y,\I I tram f.n,irunmrnt_:I:\n.:h.�l .fa,n..;r„n�h.tr.;�.tnrnt,+r kilhm,;,tn,!Inn❑11.thil,tt,fi,nil`ti,�n. i„t ,ui,l,ult.•it cnu,lrr pl.tnnin, rarthlnn,'ln,.tCtl•,i1a�. h a-,•heli I`n+trrt their h,: -pc,i.tll, in ,,r.i> Lul,i>,ntd un,ir,el„pr,i anal'. th, tern,ill's nr 1-1,:,I,00r ha,kiillin,. It enu rima a . lr,tppr,:aninl,�.l.C,+n1.1,t!!1l'tial,• 1Ult I:c�i,i,�nt\l.nt,t,rr. „trent,,,.11„'an, ,r•.,,•t.11i,nlinarr.t.,•,�ri�lhrro,trr IlewIIMI!.t,Ir.1,lnrain❑r,1.nlim.tl.,1,+n+'[IMIIhil,+t.tl�pn,.i,h r�trlin,:•„1,ul.tli„n>,a;hr Iat,r-t 1,,,•.rrrJ tni,llrnrck. it. I:r!`,+rl lhr tin,iin,iminr,ltalrl, to„cul ,ul,or+.i.,,r.If„nl hay. .1n, yur�U„n,,:bnul Ihr 11101-,1i 1l r,-"'MI I—It Ih, Cin I, to'i t 'l It 111 111 it 1111 ttrll t,11 \n,ll„t. PE Form 1 - Request For Plant Engineering Services I. CLIENT REQUEST FOR PLANT ENGINEERING USE ONLY Prime Account Number P.F.N. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Type of Funds: LINE ITEM ❑ PROG/OPER ❑ GP❑ J.O.Account No. EQUIP❑ MAINT ❑ OVERHEAD❑ OTHER❑ Date Received Work Requested: DESIGN ❑ SCOPE ❑ Client Code CONSTRUCTION ❑ OTHER ❑ (See Reverse Side) Client Contact: Ext. Organization: Location of Work: Requested Completion Date: Brief Description of Work: Area Location: White ❑ Red❑ Green ❑ Exclusion ❑ 11. APPROVALS: This authorizes Plant Engineering to proceed with the requested work in Section I. A separate authorization will be obtained prior to construction if requested. Authorized signature as listed in the Account Authorization Book Please Print Name Date Allocated Funds NEPA Required Yes❑ No ❑ NEPA on File Yes❑ No ❑ Client Construction Authorization Required: Yes❑ No ❑ III. PE ACTION: To Be Completed by Project Management/Specific Work Unit/Shops Job Title: Estimated Start: Estimated Completion: Design Organization: Construction Organization: PD ❑ FTD ❑ P/E❑ DS ❑ N/A ❑ L O❑ P O❑ SHOPS❑ SWU❑ SITE 300 ❑ N/A ❑ Davis-Bacon Yes❑ No ❑ By: PE Project Manager/Project Supervisor: Ext. Signature IV. STANDARD DISTRIBUTION(By PE) Client Contact L- Security L- PM/PS L- IWO L- Resource Manager L- Specific Work Unit L- Bldg.Coord. L- Space&Site Planning L- Finance L- Use L- Environmental L- Others L- Hazards Control L- Others L- LL 5222(Rev.10/92)7600-69202 DEFINITION OF TERMS This form defines the basic work agreement between Plant Engineering and a client.The Plant Engineering Project Manager/Project Supervisor will be responsible to the client for work requested.The authorization by the client enables the PE Project Manager/Project Supervisor to act as his representative within PE to assure that work requested is performed.Specific definitions are discussed below. I. Client Reguest Scope: A scope is a job description and a cost estimate provided prior to design or engineering effort The accuracy of the estimate is a function of haw dearly the task is defined. Design: Design of a job will produce a set of drawings(and specifications if required)for client review and approval. Identification and ordering of long lead items will be done during design only if construction is also authorized Construction: A request for construction will be treated as authorization by the client to proceed with procurement of material and construction Change Orders,etc.will be presented for client approval/authorization as the job progresses. Other: AS Augmented Scope EO Estimate Only C3 Const.w/T-I11 Support ES Engineering Study CDR Conceptual Design Report PM Project Management CM Construction Management PP Project Plan CT Cost Tracking VE Value Engineering DB Design/Build I t. ,prarovals Allocated Funds: Dollar amount authorized for PE to proceed with requested work.This is not necessarily an estimate of the expected cost for work.An estimate will be prepared after the criteria for the requested work have been reviewed by the project team and each team member will contribute to the projected cost plan.This cost plan will then be presented to the client for approval. NEPA: Client is responsible for obtaining NEPA documentation. III. P.E. Action Design Organization: DS Design Services FTD Fast Track Design N/A Not Applicable P/E� Planner/Estimators PD Project Design Construction Organization: LO tabor Only N/A Not Applicable PO Purchase Order SHOPS Plant Engineering Shop Support SITE 300 Plant Engineering Support at S-300 SWU Specific Work Unit 10/21/92 Procedure No. 300 -9- 11/10/92 B-DIVISION FIRING AREA ACCESS AND MUSTER CONTROL SYSTEM F. OPERATIONAL CONTROLS - cont'd 1. General Considerations - cont'd c. Control Points Building 897 is the West Control Point (WCP); Building 895 is the East Control Point (ECP). On days that RET is established, the CP Operator is normally on duty a half hour before the start of the bunker crew's normal workday. He/she can be located at either CP. During RET, the CP Operator will be located at the CP of the area under RET. During normal working hours, the CP can be contacted by telephone (Ext. 3-5270); by radio (call sign "Sierra 45" on channels SZI B,C, D or "fence watch"); or by personal visit. During off-shift, weekends and holidays, Ext. 3-5270 and the "Sierra 45" radio calls are answered by the PFD Central Alarm Station (CAS) Operator. d. Off-Road Travel Under non-RET conditions, travel on paved roads is not restricted. However, personnel movement anywhere off the paved roads is -controlled 24 hours a day, seven days a week, regardless of whether RET is in effect or not. All personnel must obtain permission by telephone (Ext 3-527Q) orby radio (call sign Siena 45) before leaving a paved road an3Mhere at Site 300. They must also similarly notify the CP when they have returned to a paved road (see Procedures Nos. 136 and 138 and the memo from M. L. Grissom to Distribution, "New Off-Road Travel Requirements for Site 300", dated April 10, 1992). All personnel travel off paved roads during off-hours is controlled by the PFD Central Alarm Station (CAS) Operator (Ext. 3-5270 or Sierra 45). e. Barricades, fences, etc. Personnel shall not climb fences or go around gates to enter a closed muster area. An unsafe vehicle must be reported to the A utomo- months or more,and to have his or her badge accord- tive Fleet Division Office immediately and removed inglymarked.Suspension of drixingprivileges mustbe from sen1ce. Vehicles requiring non-safety repairs done in accordance with the Personnel Policies and Pro- should be scheduled for service with the Automotive cedures Manual, Section E 11. In addition, the violator Fleet Division(2-7476). must complete the HS-560 Defensive Driving course to It is normally the responsibility of either the ve- earn reinstatement of on-site driving privileges by the hicle's operator or its custodian to schedule repair/ end of the 3-month suspension period. servicing and see that the vehicle is delivered to Auto- — Fourih moving violation within a 12-month motive Sen ices. period after the first.The Protective Force Division will inform the person's AD and Staff Relations that a fourth violation has occurred. The AD will initiate action to 35.07 Vehicle Operation suspend the person's on-site driving privileges for 12 months or more,and to have his or her badge marked All motor vehiclesand bicyclesmust beoperated in accordingly. Suspension of driving privileges or fur- accordance with the provisions of the California Ve- ther corrective action,such as suspension or dismissal, hicle Code. On the LLNL-Liven-nore site, the maxi- must be done in accordance with the Personnel Policies mum speed is 25 miles per hour unless otherwise and Procedures Manual,Section E 11. posted. At Site 300,the maximum speed is 35 miles per * Employees committing extreme violations ho-br unless otherwise posted. Drivers must always (e.g.,reckless or drunk driving)will immediately have operate vehicles at a speed that is reasonable,safe,and all on-site driving privileges suspended,and corrective proper for the conditions. Speeding and moving traffic action will be initiated per the Personnel Policies and infractions are a serious safety concern. Drivers who Procedures Manual, Section E 11. Such violations may violate either the Vehicle Code or Laboratory policy are result in public court citations. subject to citation by the Protective Force Division as 0 Appeals will be in accordance with the Person- well as corrective action by LLNTL Management. nel Policies and Procedures Manual, Section H (Griev- ances and Administrative Review). Traffic Citations In the area of nonmoving violations,citations and The Protective Force Division will cite violators of penalties will generally be issued only for safety-and on-site traffic and parking regulations. Non-employ- security-related violations until parking is adequate. ees (contractors, vendors,guests) may have their on- (ADs may individually control their employees'park- site driving privileges suspended. Employees who ing as they deem appropriate.) commit moving viola tions will becited according to the following plan: a Associate Directors (ADs) will be notified of 3108 On-Site Parking traffic and parking violations committed by employees in their organizations. At their discretion,ADs may All nongovernment vehicles must be parked in take corrective action beyond the minimum require- designated parking lots.Parking is permitted in other ments below. areas for government vehicles and those private ve- usageRoutine violations (e.g., speeding, seatbelt hicles that have special parking permits. All vehicles , etc.)will be handled as follows: must park in designated areas only and not overlap — First moving violation.The Protective Force adjacent spaces orblock the flow of traffic.Backing into Division will issue a written LLNTL citation to the viola- diagonal spaces is prohibited and into perpendicular tor,and the date of the infraction will be noted. spaces is not recommended.Violators of on-site park- - Second moving violation within a 12-month ing regulations are subject to citation under the provi- period after the first.The Protective Force Division will sions of the California Vehicle Code,Section 21113. write a letter informing the person's AD and Staff Relations that a second violation has occurred.The AD Special Parking Permits will initiate corrective action.Corrective action mustbe Special parking permits are issued by the Security done in accordance with the Personnel Policies and Pro- Department, L-422, under the following circum'- cedures Manual, Section E ll*. Corrective action will stances: include a written notice that the employee's on-site 0 Annual and temporary permits to park in areas driving privileges are placed on probation. otherthan thedesignated parking lotsmaybeissued to .— Third moving violation within a 12-month the Director,Associate Directors,and the administra- period after the first.The Protective Force Division will tive senior managers. inform the person's AD and Staff Relations that a third 0 At the written request of the Senior LLNL violation has occurred. The AD will initiate action to Medical Physician,parking permits of a specific dura- suspend the person's on-site driving privileges for 3 35-2 Procedure No. 300 -10- 11/10/92 B-DIVISION FIRING AREA ACCESS AND MUSTER CONTROL SYSTEM F. OPERATIONAL CONTROLS - cont'd 1. General Considerations - cont'd f. Visible and Audible Alarms and Appropriate Responses (1) Road Signs There are three lighted signs on the road leading to the firing areas that simply indicate whether a facility is accessible or not. One is located at the Main Gate, another at the Process Area Post and the other just past the intersection leading to the East and West Firing Areas. A red light indicates that the facility is inaccessible usually due to either a local or an area muster. A green light indicates that the facility is.open, even if RET is established. Other traffic signs are visible to traffic approaching the CP only during RET. (2) Rotating (or Flashing) Beacons A blue rotating beacon at each CP is intended simply as notification that there will be explosives testing or radiographic work conducted in the firing area sometime during the day. Amber rotating beacons located throughout the firing areas indicate that the area is under RET. Red rotating beacons acons located throughout the firing areas indicate that the area is under muster and that all personnel movement from facilities in the firing area is therefore prohibited. Only under special conditions defined by the Bunker Supervisor is anyone permitted to leave a facility under muster conditions. (3) �kloud; intermittent horn sounding in conjunction with the red Erotating beacons indicates that final preparations have been made to conduct a test and that a detonation could occur suddenly: When the intermittent horn sounds, anyone who is unprotected and/or unaccounted for within a local muster area or within the firing area must. (a) if located within a few yards of a bunker, immediately push the large red button on the nearest arm/run/safe box (doing so will immediately render the firing system incapable of delivering energy to the explosive), or Interdepartmental letterhead Mail Station L- 871 Ext; 3-5217 SITE 300 ADMINISTRATIQN October 7, 1993 TO: Distribution FROM: James E.Lane SUBJECT: Policy Regarding Access to the Arnsinckia grandiflora Site The Amsinckia grandiftora (Large Flowered Fiddleneck),located at the building 858 Drop Tower and in Draney Canyon,is federally listed as an endangered species. With this distinction,the Site 300 Manager is responsible to see that population(s)on-site are protected. The Drop Tower population(historical main population)is southwest of the drop tower on a steep north facing slope. The main population is protected by an 8 foot high chain link fence that generally denies access without a key. Approved access is through a locked gate in the chain link fence. The key for the gate resides with the Protective Force Division security officers. They have instructions to deny access to the area without approval. Access approval can only be granted by Milton L. Grissom,Site 300 Manager or James E.Lane,Site 300 Deputy Manager. Access to the area was recently granted to Tina Carlsen and fellow researchers,to conduct a field project near the main population. The project proposes to reintroduce the flower in its natural setting. The reintroduction plot is sited directly south of the drop tower and southeast of the main population. The research project also requires access to the main population,which was granted. The Draney Canyon population is in a deep canyon near Site 3Ws west perimeter. This location is protected by the ruggedness of the terrain. Recently a brochure(UCRL-TB-107648"SITE 300 ENDANGERED SPECIES How You Can Protect Them")was developed and distributed to all Site 300 personnel. The descriptors and associated pictures of the various strains of Amsinckia would be very useful as a guide in identifying new populations. Any new or suspected sightings should be reported to Site 300 management. The federal and state agencies that regulate endangered species have agreed that sufficient physical and administrative controls are in place to protect the Site 300 populations. However, we must continue our vigilance to assure that protection of the Amsinckia grand ora is maintained. Ones E.Lane Site 300 Deputy Manager Cy: Supervisory Advisory Group T.Carlsen C.DeGrange M.Grissom W.Davis M.Gonzalez Univerli%I NAornia i '■ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Interdepartmental letterhead Mad stanor,L 871 Exr: 3-5217 SITE 300 ADMINISTRATION November 5, 1992 TO: Lt. Wayne Davis FROM: James E. Lane SUBJECT: Access To Area South Of The B-858 Drop Tower The Environmental Protection Department is conducting a field project that will reintroduce the large-flowered fiddleneck (Amsinckia grandiflora) into its natural environment. The field project location is directly south of the existing population at the drop tower. The project is under the leadership of Tina Carlsen and is funded by the Laboratory Director and approved by the State and Federal endangered species offices. In order to facilitate project coordination,we are approving direct access to the site through the B-858 gates by the following project team members. Tina Carlsen Steve Gregory Rebecca Nations Eric Wafter We agreed that access by the team members can be accomplished by marrying an administrative series lock with the existing security lock. This will allow them freedom to come and go as they please,provided programmatic activities do not preclude entry. All listed team members have taken HS-95. will leave the coordination of combining the administrative lock with the security lock to you and Tina. A reminder,the only personnel that can authorize access into this area is M. L. Grissom and J. E. Lane. James E.Lane Site 300 Administrative Operations Copy: T. Carlsen S. Gregory M. Grissom R. Nations E.Walter File Universityof California 1'■ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory ENT of TAM United States Department of the Interioro FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE CH 3 Fish and Wildlife Enhancement Sacramento Field Office 2800 Cottage Way,Room E-1803 Sacramento,California 95825-1846 In Reply Refer To: 1-1-92-1-1403 Mr. William McConachie Division Leader Environmental Restoration Division Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory P.O. Box 808 Livermore, California 94550 Dear Mr. McConachie: This responds to your September 18, 1992, request for informal consultation with the Service under section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, as amended, regarding the proposed establishmbnt of a new population of the large-flowered fiddleneck (Amsinckia grandiflora) at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) Site 300. Your proposal was received in our office on September 23, 1992. At issue are the effects of the proposed project on designated critical habitat of the large-flowered fiddleneck. No large-flowered fiddleneck population currently exists lon .the proposed project site. We have reviewed the proposed project and concur with your determination that the establishment of an additional population of the large-flowered fiddleneck will not adversely affect critical habitat of the large-flowered fiddleneck. The project should benefit this species without affecting any other listed species in the area and will promote the conservation of the large-flowered fiddleneck. Since the proposed project will not adversely affect listed species or critical habitat, the consultation process is terminated and no further action is necessary. Consultation must be reinitiated if new information reveals effects of the action that may affect large-flowered fiddleneck or its critical habitat in a manner or to an extent not considered in this consultation, if the project is substantially modified in a manner that causes an effect to large-flowered fiddleneck or its critical habitat that was not considered in this consultation, or if a new species or critical habitat is determined that may be affected by the action. The Service commends you and your staff for your efforts to reintroduce the large-flowered fiddleneck into historical habitat on LLNL. We hope your project will be successful in establishing an additional population and furthering the recovery of this endangered plant. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Kirsten Tarp of my staff at (916) 978-4866. Sincerely, Wayne S. White Field Supervisor cc: Regional Director (AFWE) , FWS, Portland, OR LDRD-Supporting Research Proposal I. Title of Proposal: Habitat and Environmental Restoration: A Proposal to Investigate Techniques to Restore California Native Perennial Grasses and the Endangered Amsinckia grandiflora II. Name of Principal Investigator: Tina Carlsen Env. Restoration Names of Collaborators: Bruce Pavlik Mills College John Menke UC Davis III. Lead PO Organization: Environmental Restoration Division IV. Project Description Background A unique opportunity exists at LLNL Site 300 to conduct greatly needed research into the restoration of native California habitat. This need for habitat restoration information is becoming more acute as we attempt to return formerly disturbed sites to their "pristine" state. Industries such as mining are required by environmental regulations to post a bond to be used for habitat restoration at the completion of mining operations. As hazardous waste sites are decontaminated through processes such as landfill capping or soil excavation and treatment, large areas will require some degree of habitat restoration. In California, as well as other parts of the country, interest is developing in returning native vegetation (pre-European contact) to these sites and other public and private lands. For example, in California, the vast ranges of native perennial bunch grasses once dominated by Stipa pulchra and Poa scabrella have given way to rangeland dominated by introduced annual grasses native to the Mediterranean area, such as Avena fatua and Bromus diandrus(Heady, 1988). These annual grasses are characterized by germinating in the fall with the onset on rain, growing vegetatively throughout the winter,and flowering, setting seed and dying in mid- to late- spring. Native perennial grasses, on the other hand, stay green later into the summer and go into a state of summer dormancy from which they emerge to regreen in the fall prior to the onset of sufficient rainfall for annual grass germination (Menke, 1989). Thus, investigations are currently underway into the forage value and grazing tolerance of native perennial grasses (Menke, 1992). Biological survey data collected at Site 300 indicates that the institutional practice of annually burning the introduced grasses as a means of fire control, as well as the elimination of grazing, has greatly increased native perennial grass populations (Carlsen, 1992a,b; Taylor and Davilla, 1986). Habitat restoration in the context of endangered species protection is also important to those sites which contain designated critical habitats of federally listed endangered species.The Endangered Species Act requires critical habitat to be designated for all species listed as endangered under the act. A recovery plan is prepared for the species which outlines requirements necessary to increase the species numbers to such a level that it can be delisted.The act also requires federal agencies to utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of endangered and threatened species. In many cases, habitat alteration is a causal factor in the decline of a species. For the large-flowered fiddleneck,Amsinckia grandiflora, found at LLNL Site 300,evidence suggest that the conversion from a perennial to an annual grassland system has been a primary cause in the decline of this species (Pavlik, 1990). The draft recovery plan (USFWS 1986) outlines DOE involvement, and calls for enhancement of the two existing Site 300 populations to 2500 individuals (currently these populations contain approximately 30 and 300 individuals). Reintroduction efforts are currently underway at other locations using fire and herbicide treatments to control annual grass competition (Pavlik, 1991).However, work has not been done on establishing A.grandiflora populations within native perennial bunch grass communities. Although these populations will initially require intensive management,a community of A. grandiflora and perennial bunch grasses hold the potential of decreased future management as a result of the "tussock" or bunch grass growth form. This type of grass morphology concentrates productivity in the tussock,depressing productivity in the interspaces between tussocks. These interspaces may then allow for increased vertical biodiversity by creating temporal niches for various annual forbs. And although the perennial grassland visually appears less productive compared to the "sward" growth type of annual grasses, productivity is actually similar between the two communities due to the concentration of biomass in the tussock (Caldwell, 1992). Thus, Site 300 presents a rare opportunity to investigate techniques for establishing and maintaining both native perennial bunch grasses and to determine if this community can provide a spatial and temporal niche for the endangered A.grandiflora. Proposed Work We propose to develop techniques for the restoration of a perennial bunch grass and large-flowered fiddleneck community in the California annual grassland type. We plan to test the hypothesis that a perennial bunch grass community can provide the required spatial and temporal niche required for persistence of A. grandiflora. Collaboration The work will be a collaborative effort between LLNL, Mills College (funded through the California Department of Fish and Game), and the University of California, Davis. Benefits There are two products from the proposed study. The first is a reintroduced community of perennial bunch grasses and A. grandiflora at Site 300, which itself can be considered a state and national resource. But second, and as important, will be applied management techniques for the restoration of perennial grasslands. These techniques can be used at waste sites, mine sites, and other grassland locales where the establishment of perennial grasses is desirable. Results of the study will be used in other areas of Site 300 following environmental restoration activities, as well as other California and western grassland community sites.A secondary goal of the study is to show that biological restoration projects of this kind can be conducted in such a way as to minimize impact to site operations. The project has the potential for being a highly visible and successful study for which the Laboratory can be credited for taking a broad view of environmental restoration. The study will project the Laboratory as sincere in its goal of state-of- the-art research on the environment,and will contribute to greatly needed techniques on habitat restoration. Future Funding Future funding for ongoing research into the restoration of perennial grasses and A.grandiflora could potentially come from the US Fish and Wildlife Service, California Native Plant Society, Calif. Dept. of Fish and Game, and the National.Science Foundation. In addition, for use in concert with site decontamination,potential funding may come from DOE's Environmental Restoration and Waste Minimization Program. Work Plan The work will consist of reintroducing A.grandiflora, P.scabrella and S.pulchra on the east facing canyon directly across from the existing population of A. grandiflora near Drop Tower 858 at Site 300. This area is contained within the designated critical habitat for A. grandiflora, and has no current or future plans for development due to its steep topography. Seed for A. grandiflora will come from the nursery stock of either Mills College, UC Berkeley or UC Davis (all of which are traceable to the Site 300 population). Clone fragments of P.scabrella and S.pulchra.will come from existing populations at the northern portion of Site 300. Soil samples from a minimum of 10 locations within the reintroduction area will be obtained to determine soil characteristics (moisture content, grain. size, salinity,etc.).The experimental design, sowing and treatments techniques to be used will be similar to that of Pavlik, 1990. Transplantation of perennial bunch grass clones will be conducted similar to that of Dyer(1992). The experimental design will be a stratified-randomized design, with postsowing treatments consisting of fire or herbicide treatments (as well as controls). Sowing and postsowing treatments will be conducted during October through November of 1992. Phenological observations, surface cultivation after germination to kill the first crop of exotic grasses, as well as posttreatment plant cover measurements will be made throughout the winter. In addition, each plot will be instrumented to monitor soil surface and air temperature, as well as soil moisture. Rainfall measurements throughout the year will be used to refine a predictive model of annual grass competitive ability, and a subset of plots may be selected for supplemental irrigation. During the spring anthesis, the number of individual A. grandiflora per plot will be counted, and flower morph recorded.A. grandiflora is a dimorphic species, with two distinct flower types. All the flowers of an individual plant is either of the pin flower morph (stigma extruded), or thrum flower type (anthers extruded, see Figure 1). This dimorphism has a significant impact on the reproductive success of the species, with the highest seed set observed from intemiorph pollinations (Omduff, 1976). The percent cover of the perennial grasses will be determined using line point sampling procedures on permanently established transects. When the plants are near senescence, height will be determined on a randomly selected subset of A. grandiflora,P.scabrella and S.pulchra from each plot. Height measurements of A.grandiflora will be used to predict fecundity, and thus the following years population number, using the following equation developed by Pavlik(1991): #nutlets/plant = 3.42 (shoot length in cm) -65.46 Correlation Coefficient (r): 0.86 Significance level (p): <0.01 Half of the treatment plots will by randomly selected for follow-up treatment in the Fall of 1993. The other half of the 1992 treated plots will be use as a control. The second year of treatment will provide information on the number of years intensive management is necessary before a self-sustaining community is established, or the minimum amount of manipulation required to maintain the community. Time Period The first phase of the proposed study can be completed within one fiscal year. However, to develop information on the stability of the reintroduced community, a minimum of a second year of work is required. V. Risks/Uncertainties Several risks and uncertainties are associated with this project. As with any vegetation restoration effort, there is the risk that the reintroduced propagules will die or not take hold. However, there is some information from investigators currently working on such techniques which will help reduce such a risk. A major uncertainty is the intensity of the annual grass competition as a result of a well developed seed bank. This could result in more intensive management being initially required than expected, at least until the seed bank is significantly reduced. Finally, when using fire as a management tool, there is the risk of run- away wildfires. Fortunately, there is a fully staffed fire department at Site 300 with experience in prescribed burning, and part of the requested budget will be used to obtain assistance from the fire control staff during,the fire treatments. VI. Major milestones/deliverables over duration of project Major Milestone Deliverable Date FY 1993 Complete plot establishment 10/31/92 Complete fall sowing 11/30/92 Complete fall plot treatments Interim report on treatments 01/30/93 Complete phenological observations 06/01/93 Complete anthesis data collection Interim report on community 07/30/93 establishment FY 1994 Complete plot selection for 10/31/93 treatments Complete fall treatments Interim report on 2nd yr treatments 01/30/94 Complete phenological observations 06/01/94 Complete anthesis data collection Interim report on community 07/30/94 establishment FY 1995 Complete follow up on plots Final report on community 06/01/95 establishment VII. Costs FY 1993(K) FY1994(K) FY1995(K) Operations 107 98 59 Capital Equipment 6 0 0 See attached LDRD budget form. Please note this has been revised since submittal of the first abstract. Capital Costs The capital costs submitted for this project are for the purchase of soil moisture psychrometers with temperature thermocouples and data loggers. This equipment is absolutely necessary to allow us to track the partitioning of water (the major limiting resource in this ecosystem), between annual grasses, perennial grasses, and the various forbs. This information will allow us to develop predictive equations for community structure based on moisture availability, and to determine the optimal hydrologic regime for A. grandiflora. Second year capital costs are for repair, replacement, or purchase of additional psychrometers. References Carlsen,T.M. 1992a. Ecological Assessment. In The Draft LLNL Site 300 Remedial Investigation Report, Webster-Scholten, ed. In preparation. Carlsen, T.M. 1992b. Ecological Risks at Superfund Sites:Research/Regulatory Drivers in the 1990s. To be presented at Spectrum '92 in Boise, Idaho on August 23 to 27, 1992. Dyer, 1992. unpublished thesis data. Endangered Species Act of 1973. USC 1531 et seq., as amended. Heady, H.F. 1988. Valley Grassland. In pages 492-502. M.G. Barbour and J. Majors, editors. Terrestrial Vegetation of California. California Native Plant Society. Menke, J.W. 1989. Management Controls on Productivity. In pages 173-199. L.F. Huenneke and H.A. Mooney, editors. Grassland Structure and Function - California Annual Grassland. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Boston. Menke,J.W. 1992. Grazing and Fire Management for Native Perennial Grass Restoration in California Grasslands. Fremontia 20(2):22-25. Omduff, R. 1976. The Reproductive System of Amsinckia grandiflora, a Distylous Species. Systematic Botany 1:57-66. Pavlik, B.M. 1991. Management of Reintroduced and Natural Populations of Amsinckia grandiflora. California Department of Fish and Game. Pavlik, B.M. 1990. Reintroduction of Amsinckia grandiflora to Stewartville. California Department of Fish and Game. Taylor, D.W. and W. Davilla. 1986. Vegetation of Site 300 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory San Joaquin County, California prepared for Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory by BioSystems Analysis, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1986.Draft Recovery Plan for the Large-Flowered Fiddleneck (Amsinckia grandiflora). Portland, Oregon. 1976] ORNIn;I-I-: ANISINCKIn C-PANDiFt ORA 59 pin thrum 1 2� D:\ 1 2 t 1 t l r � 2 i r t r Ftc. 1-4. Flowers of Am.rinch irr Brandi f lont. — 1. Intact lain flower.-2. Dissected pill flower.—3. Intact thrum flo cr.—-l. DisscctCd tltrUM flower. Laboratory Directed Research & Development FY 1993 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Entered 05/01/92 Modified 05/29/92 Block1 - General Information ........................................................................................................................................................................... Proposal Title Habitat and Environmental Restoration: A Proposal to Investigate Proposal Type LW Techniques to Restore California Native Perennial Grasses and the Technical Area Endangered Amsinckia grandiflora Environmental/Waste R&D Proposal continued from FY92 Proposal tracking N° ..... Block 2 - Principal Investigator ......................................................................................................................................................................... First/Last Name Tina --TC L-Code L 528 Directorate Plant Operations Phone 2-7103 Dept Environmental Protection Email Div Environmental Restoration Fax 35764 Block 3 - Responsible AD ................................................ Block 4 - Responsible Resource Mgr ................................... Directorate First/Last Name James Doggett Jr. Plant Operations L-Code L-627 Phone 3-2882 Block5 - Co-Investigators -----_.-.........-.-------------------------------—..........................-......----------------- First/Last Name John Menke Phone L-Code L- Directoratel Plant Operations First/Last Name Bruce Paulik Phone L-Code Directorate First/Last Name Phone L-Codel IDirectorate First/Last Name Phone L-Code Directorate :......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................: Due to DOE regulations,the sum of the characters for the following three fields must be less than 3000. The number of characters entered so far is:2976. Block6a - Project Description................................................................................................................................................................................... Project Abstract We propose to develop techniques for the restoration of a perennial bunch grass and large-flowered fiddleneck community.We plan to test the hypothesis that a perennial bunch grass community can provide the required spatial and temporal niche required for persistence of A. grandiflora. Biological survey data collected at Site 300 indicates that the institutional practice of annually burning the introduced grasses as a means of fire control, as well as the elimination of grazing, has greatly increased native perennial grass populations. There is currently much interest in perennial grassland restoration in California due to the fact that native perennial grasses stay green later into the summer and go into a state of summer dormancy from which they emerge to regreen in the fall often prior to annual grass germination. Thus, investigations are currently underway to determine the forage value and grazing tolerance of native perennial grasses. Site 300 also contains the critical habitat for the endangered large-flowered fiddleneck,Amsinckia grandiflora. Evidence suggest that the conversion from a perennial to an annual grassland system has been a primary cause in the decline of this species. A community of A. grandiflora and perennial bunch grasses hold the potential of decreased future management of this species. Thus, Site 300 presents a rare opportunity to investigate techniques for establishing and maintaining native perennial bunch grasses and to determine if this community can provide a spatial and temporal niche for the endangered A.grandiflora. ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Block6b - Project Description ................................................................................................................................................................................ Major Accomplishments and Results - FY 1992 %..............................................................:......................................................................................................................................................................................................: Block6c - Project Description ............................................................................................................................................................................. Proposed Work and Anticipated/Desired Results - FY 1993 The work will consist of reintroducing A.grandiflora, P. scabrella and S. pulchra on the east facing canyon directly across from Drop Tower 858 at Site 300 during the fall of 1992.Sowing and postsowing treatments will consist of fire, herbicide, surface cultivation, or supplemental irrigation. Phenological observations and plant cover measurements will also be made throughout the winter. Each plot will be instrumented to monitor soil surface and air temperature,as well as soil moisture. At anthesis,the number of individual A. grandiflora and cover of perennial grasses per plot will be determined.At senescence,fecundity will be determined on individuals randomly selected from each plot. Follow-up observations during FY94 will provide information on the number of years intensive management is necessary before a self-sustaining community is established,or the minimum amount of manipulation required to maintain the community. There are two products from the proposed study.The first is a stable community of perennial bunch grasses and A. grandiflora at Site 300, which itself can be considered a state and national resource. But second, and as important, will be applied management techniques for the restoration of perennial grasslands which can be used at waste sites, mine sites, and other grassland locales where the establishment of perennial grasses is desirable. ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................: Get Information for Blocks 7 - 13 from your resource manager, Items with a bold outline will be automatically calculated by the system. FY1993 FY1994 FY1995 Block7 - Manpower Expenses ............................................................................................................................................................................... A. FTE.................................................................. I $0 $0 (for estimate,use FTE=1800 manhour) 4.......................................................................................................................... B. Wage Expense................................................... $47,560 $43,381 $24,891 (FTE x Ave Annual Salary x 1.210) I......................................................................................................................... C. Support Department Burden.................................. i $14,744 $13,448 $7,840 (Burden Rate x Wage Expense) D. Overhead.......................................................... $35,670 $32,536 $18,668 (75%x Wage Expense) Manpower Total $97,974 $89,365 $51,399 E. Labor Consultants.............................................. ........................................................................................................................ F. Labor LBL......................................................... G. Labor Post Doctorates........................................ 1 ............................................................................................................................ H. Labor - Summer Hires............................................ .......................................................................................................................... I. Labor - Supplemental............................................ J. Labor - Supplemental + 60.0% Overhead................... Other Labor Total ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Block 8 Capital Equipment Summary Requests Over $5000 (FY1993-FY1995)........................................................ FY1993 Priority Item Cost 1 data logger $6,000 $6,000 FY1994 Priority Item Cost 0 $0 FY1995 Priority Item Cost ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... � Block 9 Procurements Block 10 - Expenses .'' '............ -. -_-'---. ----'_---_--------__-'-- 0.Other 8hock 11 ' Services Fod|dien so Block12 ' Computers ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... Total Computers Block 13 - Totals ---. _. ._...... ._. _.._... . -- FY1993 FY1994 FY1995 A. Project Operational (Blocks 7, 9, 10, 11, and 12..................... $103,974 $95,365 $57,399 B. Laboratory General Expense (3%of the values in A. for 3 years)............ $3,119 $2,861 $1,722 C. Project Operational Cost Total (Sum of A. and B.).................................. $107,093 $98,226 $59,121 D. Project Capital Equipment (Block 8)............................................... $6,000 Project Grand Total (C+D) ............ $113,093 $98,226 $59,121 i 1 .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................1 Curriculum Vitae Tina Marie Carlsen PRESENT POSITION: Division: Environmental Restoration Department:Environmental Protection Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory P.O. Box 808, Mail Stop L-528 Phone: (510)422-7103 PERSONAL: Citizenship: U.S. PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS: National Water Well Assoc., Ground Water Scientists and Engineers Div. California Native Grass Association. California Native Plant Society. PROFESSIONAL LICENSES: Qualified Pesticide Applicator Certificate No.47815, Category D. CDFA. EDUCATION: University of Califomia, Davis, Ph.D., Range Ecology, in progress. University of San Francisco, M.S., Environmental Management, 1990. California State University, Stanislaus, B.A. Biological Sciences, 1984. Modesto Junior College, Modesto, A.S. Biological Sciences, 1982. PREVIOUS RESEARCH EXPERIENCE: Ecotoxicology of VOCs, tritium and heavy metals at LLNL Site 300; ground water geochemistry; the use of plant growth regulators to enhance yield in foodcrops. HONORS: Graduated Summa Cum Laude (California State University, 1984) Associate Member,Sigma Xi PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: 1983-1986: Research Associate, Shell Biological Sciences Research Center, Modesto, Ca. 1986-1989: Environmental Scientist, Environmental Monitoring Group,LLNL. 1989-1991: Environmental Scientist,Environmental Restoration Division,LLNL. 1991-Present: Acting Group Leader, Site 300 Environmental Chemistry and Biology Group, Environmental Restoration Division, LLNL. GENERAL RESEARCH INTERESTS: 1) Community ecology and restoration of native perennial grasslands and other native species using fire and other management techniques. 2) Management of federal reserves to promote biological diversity with minimal impact to reserve missions. 3) Ecotoxicology with respect to population and community impacts. PUBLICATIONS AND PAPERS: Carlsen, T.M. 1992a. Ecological Assessment. In The Draft LLNL Site 300 Remedial Investigation Report, Webster-Scholten, ed. In preparation. Carlsen,T.M. 1992b. Ecological Risks at Superfund Sites:ResearchlRegulatory Drivers in the 1990s. To be presented at Spectrum '92 in Boise, Idaho on August 23 to 27, 1992. Carlsen, T. M. 1990. Enhanced Soil Bioremediation Pilot Study in LLNL Site 300 Environmental Investigations Quarterly October-December 1990, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, Calif(UCAR-10194-90-4, pp.48-49). Carlsen, T. M. 1990. Enhanced Soil Bioremediation Pilot Study in LLNL Site 300 Environmental Investigations Quarterly July-September 1990, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, Calif(UCAR-101.94-90-3, pp.57-61). Carlsen,T.M. 1990. Ecological and Human Health Risk Assessment in Draft Remedial Investigation of the Building 850/East Firing Area,Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Site 300, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, Calif(UCRL-ID-104335, Chapter 10). Bainer, R. W., D. W. Rice, T. M. Carlsen, and K. M. Wong. 1991. Applying a Rapid Procedure for Screening Tritium in the Vadose Zone,presented at The Characterization of Transport Phenomena in the Vadose Zone Workshop sponsored by the Soil Science Society of America and the American Geophysical Union on April 2-5, 1991. Wong,K. M. and T. M. Carlsen. 1990. A Rapid Screening Procedure for Determining Tritium in Soil,presented at The Characterization of Transport Phenomena in the Vadose Zone Workshop sponsored by the Soil Science Society of America and the American Geophysical Union on April 2-5, 1991. Carlsen,T. M. 1990. The Use of Specific Conductance as an Indicator of Ionic Groundwater Contamination at Two Waste Disposal Units at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's Site 300, Masters of Science Thesis,University of San Francisco. Schonbeck, M.W., F.C. Hsu and T.M. Carlsen. 1986. Effect of Pod Number on Dry Matter and Nitrogen Accumulation and Distribution in Soybeans. Crop Science 26:783-788. Curriculum Vitae Bruce M. Pavlik PRESENT POSITION: Associate Professor and Chair of Biology Department of Biology Mills College Oakland,California 94613 Adjunct Professor, Romberg Tiburon Center San Francisco State University PERSONAL: Citizenship: U.S. EDUCATION: University of California, Davis, Ph.D., Department of Botany, 1982 University of California, Davis, M.S.,Department of Botany, 1979 California State University at Northridge, B.A.,Department of Biology, 1975 PREVIOUS RESEARCH EXPERIENCE: Biology of endemic plants and its relation to off-road vehicle activity; insect and plant species diversity in desert sub-steppe; role of nitrogen nutrition in the water relations and salt tolerance of grasses. HONORS: 1988—Present Vice-President for Rare Plants, California Native Plant Society 1989 Council Member,California Botanical Society 1987 Fulbright Scholar Exchange Program-final candidate 1979 Outstanding Teaching Assistant Award,U.C.Davis 1975 Magna Cum Laude, Cal State University,Northridge 1975 Outstanding Biology Graduate of 1975, Cal State University, Northridge 1972 and 1973 California State Scholarship Awards GENERAL RESEARCH INTERESTS: Use of electrophoretic and tissue culture techniques to conserve endangered genotypes; photosynthesis and water stress acclimation in native evergreen trees; incorporation of autecological data and techniques for restoring and managing endangered plants and damaged plant communities. California Department of Fish and Game,Endangered Plant Project: "Reintroduction of Amsinckia grandiflora within its historical range. IV. Ongoing management for purposes of recovery." Funded for 1992-1993. Curriculum Vitae John Warren Menke PRESENT POSITION: Professor and Range Ecologist Department of Agronomy and Range Science University of California Davis, CA 95616 PERSONAL: Citizenship: U.S. PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS: California Botanical Society Society for Range Management California Native Grass Association EDUCATION: Colorado State University, Ft. Collins, Ph.D., Range Ecology, 1973 University of California,Davis, M.S., Agronomy, 1970 University of California, Davis, B.S., Range Management, 1969 American River College, Sacramento, A.A., Mathematics, 1967 PREVIOUS RESEARCH EXPERIENCE: Effects of defoliation on range plants; livestock/deer habitat relationships; modeling of annual grassland; fire and grazing management for restoration of native grassland species. HONORS: 1978 Summer Teaching Honorarium,University of Wisconsin, Madison,Dept. of Forestry 1983/4 International Agriculture Center Fellowship,Agricultural University,Wageningen,The Netherlands 1990 "The Outstanding Professor of the Year Award," University of California,Ecology Graduate Student Association PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: 1986—Present: Professor,Department of Agronomy and Range Science, University of California, Davis. 1979-1985 Associate Professor, Department of Agronomy and Range Science, University of California,Davis. 1973-1978 Assistant Professor, Department of Forestry and Resource Management, University of California, Berkeley. PUBLICATIONS AND PAPERS: Pavlik,B.M. 1992. Demographic monitoring and the recovery of endangered plants. In: Bowles, M. and C. Whalen (eds.) Restoration of Endangered Species. Blackwell Scientific (in press). Pavlik,B.M. and M.G. Barbour. 1991. Seasonal patterns of growth, water potential and gas exchange of red and white fir saplings across a montane ecotone. American Midland Naturalist 126, 14-29. Ferguson, N. and B.M. Pavlik. 1990. Propagation of an endangered plant using tissue culture techniques. Restoration and Management Notes 8, 50-51. Pavlik, B.M. 1990. Reintroduction of Amsinckia grandiflora to Stewartville. State of California, Department of Fish and Game, Endangered Plant Program, Sacramento. 59 p. Pavlik, B.M. 1988. Nutlet production and germination of Amsinckia grandiflora. I. Measurements from cultivated populations. State of California,Department of Fish and Game, Endangered Plant Program, Sacramento. 27 p. Pavlik, B.M. and K. Heisler. 1988. Habitat characterization and selection of potential sites for establishment of new populations of Amsinckia grandif lora. State of California,Department of Fish and Game, Endangered Plant Program, Sacramento. 23 p. Pavlik, B.M. 1987. Autecological monitoring of endangered plants. (In T.Elias,ed.) Rare and Endangered Plants: A California Conference. Proceedings of the Symposium. California Native Plant Society Special Publication 8,385-390. Sacramento,CA. Pavlik,B.M. 1986. Autecological monitoring of endangered plants and damaged communities. Ash Meadows Recovery Symposium, 1985 (E.P. Pister,ed.). Desert Fishes Council 17. Pavlik, B.M. 1992. The recovery of an endangered plant. I. Creating a new population of Amsinckia grandiflora. Conservation Biology (submitted) "Genetic and ecological aspects of rare plant reintroduction: the case of Amsinckia grandiflora" December 1991,Department of Industrial and Scientific Research,Christchurch,New Zealand (invited). "Recovery of an endangered plant using herbicide, fire and hand-clipping to control annual grass competition" January 1991—California Weed Conference, Santa Barbara(invited to address the general session). GENERAL RESEARCH INTERESTS: 1) Livestock and recreational pack animal effects on vegetation structure and productivity, and wildlife habitats in mountain environments. 2) Community ecology of grazing, fire, and drought effected native perennial and exotic annual plants. 3) Restoration and community ecology of upland and riparian rangeland systems. PUBLICATIONS AND PAPERS: Pendleton, D.F., J.W. Menke, W.A. Williams and R.G. Woodmansee. 1983. Annual Grassland Ecosystem Model. Hilgardia 51:1-44. Caldwell, R.M., J.W. Menke, and D.A. Duncan. 1985. Effects of sulfur fertilization on productivity and botanical composition of California annual grassland. J. Range Manage. 38:108-113. Rice, K.J. and J.W. Menke. 1985. Competitive reversals and environment-dependent resource partitioning in Erodium. Oecologia 67:430-434. Welker,J.M. and J.W. Menke. 1987. Quercus douglasii seedling water relations in mesic and grazing-induced xeric environments. Pages 229-234 In: Proc. International Conf. Measurement of Soil and Plant Water Status. Vol. 2. Plants. July 6-10, 1987. Utah State University, Logan. Loft, E.R., T.S. Burton, J.W. Menke, and G.E. Peterson. 1988. Characterization of black-tailed deer habitats in a northern California oak-conifer zone. Calif. Fish and Game 74:154-171. Menke. J.W. 1989. Management controls on productivity. Pages 173-199 In: Grassland Structure and Function California Annual Grassland. L.F. Huenneke and H.A. Mooney. (Eds.) Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. Gordon, D.R., J.M. Welker, J.W. Menke and K.J. Rice. 1989. Competition for soil water between annual plants and blue oak (Quercus douglasii) seedlings. Oecologia 79:533541. Welker,J.M. and J.W. Menke. 1990. The influence of simulated browsing on tissue water relations, growth and survival of Quercus douglasii(Hook and Am.) seedlings under slow and rapid rates of soil drought. Functional Ecology 4:807-817. Loft,E.R., J.W. Menke, and J.G. Kie. 1991. Habitat shifts by mule deer: The influence of cattle grazing. J. Wildl. Manage. 55:16-26. Menke,J.W. 1992. Grazing and fire management for native perennial grass restoration in California grasslands. Fremontia 20:22-25. Momen, B.,J.W. Menke, and J.M. Welker. 1992. Tissue water relations of Quercus wislizenii seedlings: Drought resistance in a California evergreen oak. Acta Oecologica (in press). Pesticide Operations at Site 300 Training: All pesticide operations are performed by the Labor Shop. There are currently four employees with QAC ( Qualified Applicators Certificates). All spraying of Herbicides or Pesticides is done with at least one licensed applicator present. Storage: All pesticides are stored at Bldg. 840 in a locked cage area. The Bldg. is equiped with emergency fire sprinklers. Each locker inside of the cage where the pesticides are stored are also locked. Located next to the storage area is an emergency eye wash. Mixing: All mixing of pesticides is done at Bldg. 819 where any spillage will go into a secondary containment. All faucets contain back flo preventers. An emergency eye wash is located by the door of the mixing station. Spraying of roadsides is done with a 200 gallon spray rig. Structural pest control is done with 3 .gallon hand sprayers. Material: Roadsides are sprayed with Krovar 1 DF & Oust as pre- emergants. Surflan AS is used around our landscape area as a pre- emergant. We use Round-up as a contact spray when needed. For Pest Control we use Temp-Site wide and Malathion 55 for aphid control on trees and shrubs. Zinc Phosphide is the only Rodenticide used for rodent control. All material is stored at Bldg. 840. Permit: We obtain a permit yearly from the San Joaquin Agricultural Commissioner in January for the year. When material is purchased from a vender the permit number is recorded. The only restricted material we are permitted for is the Zinc Phosphide. Reports: Monthly use reports are sent to the San Joaquin Dept. of Ag. by the 10th of each month and a copy is kept in our Plant Engineering Files. Employee Health & Safety: Any employee working with Pesticides are required to wear the proper clothing as stated on the material labels. All employees are fit tested annually for Respirators. At the end of the day or when pesticide handling is complete the employees are required to take showers. CIean clothes are provided daily for employee use. MSDS'S: All Material Safety Data Sheets are kept in our meeting room in Bldg. 873 room 243. Any new material we receive or any updated MSDS the employees are required to read. Signature: Date: /C13193 EIS/EIR Mitigation Implementation Plan Mitigation Measures 7.2.6L, M, N, O, P, U, Q-W Proposed project NO No sensitive located at Site 300? species survey required. YES Project taking No sensitive place in an NO undisturbed species survey area? required. YES EEG(or designated subcontractor)conducts survey for kit fox, American badger,and borrowing owl within 60 days of start of ground- disturbing activity.Survey methods follow USFWS techniques.The survey area will include a minimum 300-ft buffer zone around the proposed construction zone.For new fire trails,a 50-ft buffer zone will be included in surreys.For monitoring well installations,linear trenching or the redisking of the northeastern fire break,a 50-ft buffer zone will be included in kit fox surveys.(MM7.2.6L&MM72.6T) Excavated steep-walled holes or trenches greater than 2 ft.deep must be covered by PE with plywood at the close of each workday,or provided with one or more earthen or wooden escape ramps; uncovered trenches would be inspected by PE staff. If animals found, PE contacts EEG POCs. Before such holes are filled,they would be thoroughly inspected for trapped animals.(MM7.2.6P(PE)) NO Dens found? Inhouse memo. YES nown den of NO American Continue on next page. badger or burrowing owl? -' Establish and *YES ose YES delineate 50-ft. ause Maintain exclusion zone. ble NO exclusion zone (MM7.2.6U(PE (MM7.2.6U(PE in coord withr in coord with EEG)) g owl EEG)) Notify S300 Mgt to restrict activities within zone(MM72.6V Consult with CDFG for permission to reduce (S300 Mgt)) exclusion zone size or destroy den.(MM7.2.6VV) EIS/EIR Mitigation Implementation Plan Mitigation Measures 7.2.6L-W,Cont'd. Potential,known, or pupping kit fox denfound? Known *YES Potential Establish 200 ftEstablish 300-ft exclusion zone. exclusion zone. (MM7.2.6M) (MM7.2.6M) Establish 2S Place"Protected ft exclusion Place"Protected Species"sign near zone. Would den be NO P� 9 Would den be N Install 2-ft Species"sign near entrance.Install unavoidably wooden unavoidably entrance.Install fencing. destroyed? stakes with destroyed. fencing. (MM7.2.6N(PE)) flagging. (MM7.2.6N(PE)) Check monthly during (MM7.2.6M Check monthly duringconstruction period. (PE)) YES construction period. (MM7.2.6O) YES (MM72.6O) Trained kit fox Trained kit fox Trained kit fox biologist must biologist must biologist must monitor den for 3 monitor den for 3 monitor den for 3 days to determine days to determine days to determine if used. if used. if used. (MM7.2.6R) (MM7.2.6R) YES Sign of NO Trained kit fox NO Sign of NO activity after biologist Sign of activity? 2-3 more destroy den. activity? days? (MM72.6O) YES YES P raMS300 Mgt Program/S300 Mgt g evaluate other site evaluate other site altematives or alternatives or modifications to modifications to proposed project. proposed project. Excavation is prohibited January through June. Notify USFWS and Notify USFWS and CDFG CDFG in writing of NO in writing of intent to NO Alternatives destroy den,providing Alternatives intent to destroy den, available? reasons why alternatives available? providing reasons why altematives are not are not available.Wait for available.Wait for comment and permission comment and YES to destroy.(MM7.2.6R) YES permission to destroy. Prepare report of Recommend installation of monitoring and Program changes artificial dens. (MM7.2.6S) Program changes project Plugging activites to project to use to use alternatives which USFWS and CDFG. altematives which would not require den (MM7.2.6R) would not require den destruction. destruction. Recommend installation of artificial dens.(MM7.2.6S) SITE 300--LLNL RSSESSMENT SURUEY FORM [San Joaquin Kit FOH, Burrowing Owl, American Badger] TIME: RECORDER: TIME PERIOD: AM MID PM DATE: Species: Flag #: DEN STATUS (1=Active(occupied), 2=Potential(unoccupied-fresh), 3=Poter (unoccupied-old), 4=N/A, 5=Natal, 6=Pupping) HABITAT (1=Oak Woodland, 2=Sage Scrub, 3=Native/Non-native Grassland, 4=Other [describe]) TOPOGRAPHY (1=Road, 2=Hill Bottom, 3=Hill slope, 4=Hilltop, 5=Other) ASPECT SLOPE % DEFECATION (Y/N) SOIL TYPE PREY REMAINS (YM) GYPSUM(Y/N) Circle all that apply: Sticks Up Sticks down Sticks reset Sticks Set Up N MEASUREMENTS ENTRANCE HEIGHT (cm) ELEVATION (ft) ENTRANCE WIDTH (cm) #OF ENTRANCES COMPASS BEARINGS Location Bearing-1 Bearing-2 Comments: C O U 0 a� .0 .s� as O J O U- d '.' y 00 O 0-0 to O [ cf O C O O .- m � WA co cr. J9 > Z �v2c'3 m U © O d M N r .ss NZ V c�a °o a to r ... cu 0-0 u- N o ••• ti O Ca O � d v N t0 z CG va o a a M „ W Ar �' o a O) oM cc C-0, v w O N �C 0 . ,, N N Z r W '' t1SUU 0ti 2 O Jo: ,- Z 0 U 0 a 0 0 U A T a oA � o •� � y CC O .-1' it N F- J (3 •� ao o � t"' CL c a) N o to a Z x •� o CC z x M it U O v � Z vz o a v � o � � M o � U o It N x y o N civ � a O 0.it itH ii to 00 CA M ^" cs A O r-+ r.., 00 A33 Appendix B Construction Contract Provisions Contents Document Evidence for Mitigation Measure No. Engineering Certification......................................................................................6.1.1A,6.2.1A Building Design Criteria............................................................................................. 6.1.2,6.2.2 LLNL Facilities Specification Section 01130......................................................... 10.1.1, 10.2.1 (-)4GIf7 Mezzanine Remodel specification Penoor Building 153 PFM 153 91007 1 .15 ENGINEERING CERTIFICATION The designs, specifications, and drawings comprising this subcontract have been prepared by or under the cognizance of Registered Professional Engineers holding a valid license in the State of California issued by the State Board of Registration for Professional Engineers, and for licensed Architects holding valid licenses in the State of California issued by the Board of Architectural Examinerst" aria in compliance with DOE 64301A, Geneiral Design Criteria. CIVIL STRUCTURA AU Name Date Name 2226 No. Expires No. ��yi. .. .. ncpires `h OsI A. ELECTRICAL NECHANICAL NMfr v:��r is e ' ( Nalpe Date .: No.E 1051 No. sQ'I ,' res No. �'�, Expires LV ARCHITECTUR/l 9z Name Date lei; . Date Cr t1.......3 No. L .`� Ex-0$J'e N0. !�'�� .c�� Expires PART 2 PRODUCTS Not used PART 3 EXECUTION Not used END OF SECTION 01010-13 2903c/0705c 12/16/91 Security Administration Building POC-0079 Page-45 8. Anchor bolts and shear.,connector bolts. 9. Footings and slabs. 5.03 DESIGN CRITERIA A. General The basis of design and allowable unit stresses for the various building structural elements shall be in accordance with the latest edition of the documents listed in appendix A. Evaluations shall be made during the selection of individual element design allowables to avoid the occurrence of possible structural instabilities. B. Allowable Loadings 1 . Loadings used in the structural design, unless otherwise specified, shall comply with the ICBG UBC, DOE 6430..IA, and ANSI A58.1 (ASCE 7) . Loadings shall be reviewed by the A/E with respect to University programmatic requirements. 2. Building roofs and building structures shall be designed for an additional uniformly distributed roof dead load (concentrated dead load where applicable) for any supported mechanical and .electrical equipment and/or materials. C. Soils Properties Soils properties shall be based upon the specific parameters of the building site. The University will provide two copies of a soils report for the specific building site. As a minimum, the soils report will address and include the following information: 1 . Evaluation (with all required pertinent data) of the liquefaction potential of the building site(s) . 2. Soil shear modulus (static and dynamic) . 3. Poisson's ratio. 4. Suitable foundation types and depths. 5. Allowable bearing pressuresforfoundation design DL, OL + LL, DL + LL + Wind or Earthquake along with sliding friction and lateral bearing coefficients. 6. Settlement predictions. 7. Active and passive lateral earth pressures for retaining and pit wall designs along with sliding friction coefficients. Revised 06101192 SECTION 01130 SECURITY AND SITE ACCESS PROVISIONS (OPEN AREAS - LIVERMORE SITE) PART 1 GENERAL 1.01 ACCESS A. The Subcontractor shall give the University 48-hours noticep rior to initial entry to the Site. B. Between the hours of 7:30 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday each week, the construction site is in an "Open" area within the Laboratory; therefore, in general, security processing and badges will not be required between these hours, but all employees shall be United States citizens. Any necessary security processing of Subcontractor personnel and related matters will be done without charge to the Subcontractor. The Subcontractor will not be reimbursed for the cost of "lost time" required for the processing of its personnel. The Subcontractor and any sub-subcontractors shall not employ any alien to work at the Site under this subcontract without the written consent of the Department of Energy (DOE), obtained through the University tinder applicable DOE Security Regulations. All personnel appearing at the Contract Badge Office in Building 615, located on East Avenue between Greenville Road and the Building 411 shipping/receiving entrance, for entry processing shall present the following information: Subcontractor's company name, location of work site, and the Subcontractor's contact. C. Subcontractor's personnel will be limited to the construction site within the construction limits. Personnel working on walks, paving, utilities, piping, or similar outside projects are prohibited from entering g any buildings within the area of work, except when granted permission by the University. D. In the event of a National Emergency, or at any other time DOE shall deem it necessary, all Subcontractor personnel who are to be employed on the job shall report to the Contract Badge Office in Building 615, for security processing. 1. Each person shall execute a DOE Personnel Security Questionnaire (short form) and a fingerprint card. 2. Acceptable personnel will then be issued badges that will gain them entrance to the Site during the course of construction. Section 01130 LLNL Facilities Specification June 1, 1992 3. Sufficient badges will be supplied to the Subcontractor at no cost. Badges shall remain the property of the University. The Subcontractor and its personnel shall return the badges to the Contract Badge Office in Building 615 upon termination of employment at the Site. 4. The Subcontractor's personnel shall wear badges above the waist and in plain sight at all times while working within the limits of the Site. 1.02 PROHIBITED ITEMS A. Except as otherwise provided herein, do not bring the following items within the limits of the Site without proper authorization: 1. Firearms or other weapons 2. Explosives or incendiary devices 3. Cameras 4. Binoculars or telescopes 5. Narcotics and dangerous drugs, marijuana, LSD, cocaine, and other hallucinatory substances 6. Alcoholic beverages 7. Poisonous or corrosive solids, liquids, or gases 8. Electronic transmitting or receiving devices except radio equipment that is installed in vehicles and operating on frequencies assigned by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Citizens Band radios and mobile telephones may be used only for communication between elements of a subcontractor's organization. B. Obtain written permission from the LLNL Security Department for each prohibited item brought onto the Site if such items are required for execution of the work. 1. Request permission through the University Representative and state the need, the period of time that the item will be required, and the person responsible for its use. 2. Remove the items from the Site immediately upon termination of their need or termination of the period stated in the Subcontractor's request. 3. All prohibited items listed above may be confiscated if they are brought into the Site without permission or if they are being used for other purposes than those stated in the request. Section 01130 LLNL Facilities Specification June 1, 1992 - 2 - C. The Subcontractor's employees; all personal belongings including briefcases, lunchboxes, and handbags; and vehicles driven by Subcontractor's employees are subject to search for prohibited items, upon entering and leaving the Site, at the discretion of the LLNL Security Department. In addition, Subcontractors, sub-subcontractors, materialmen, and vendors entering and leaving the Site are also subject to search for prohibited items. 1.03 WORKING HOURS Limit construction operations to the hours between 7:30 a.m. and 5 p.m., Mondays through Fridays, excepting University holidays. Request approval from the University at least 48 hours in advance to work at times other than the time stated herein. 1.04 STORAGE OF MATERIALS Do not store materials, park vehicles or equipment, or locate job offices or temporary storage buildings within 50 feet of any existing fence, or within 25 feet of power poles or manholes. Exceptional circumstances will be indicated in the Special Provisions. 1.05 FENCE PENETRATIONS A. Do not make any penetrations over, under, or through existing security fences located within or on the perimeter of the Site without the permission of the University. B. All required security fence penetrations shall be conducted under Protective Services escort. C. Install temporary barricades for all penetrations when work requiring Protective Services escort is not in progress. These barricades shall be located at the existing fence line, and the Subcontractor shall use fence panel inserts provided by the University, or other approved materials. D. The installed barricades shall be approved by the LLNL Security Department and shall provide the same degree of security protection as afforded by the existing fence. 1.06 SITE ACCESS REGULATIONS - USE OF EXISTING ROADS A. Permission for access to the Site will be revoked for any and all persons who violate Site Access Regulations. All Subcontractor's personnel, and persons not regularly assigned for work at the Site, shall be made aware of and shall comply at all times with the following requirements: 1. Comply with all posted speed limits. 2. Comply with all signs and posted notices; they are for the safety of all personnel on the Site. Section 01130 LLNL Facilities Specification June 1, 1992 - 3 - 3. Do not pick-up or remove objects from the limits of the Site except the Subcontractor's construction materials, or materials removed in construction and designated by the specifications to be removed from the Site. 4. Bring in all materials for installation and conduct the work so as to minimize interference with the activities of the Laboratory and other construction work on the Site. 5. Points of access to the work for vehicles and personnel shall be as designated on the drawings applying to this subcontract, or as stated in Special Provisions. B. Only vehicles with pneumatic tires will be allowed on existing roads. C. Equip all motorized equipment with mufflers. D. Minimize use of Site roads for heavy traffic. E. Certain existing roads within the Site will be designated for the Subcontractor's use. Do not use other roads without first obtaining permission from the University. F. Keep existing Site roads open at all times. When obstructions on existing Site roads are required because of construction, obtain the approval of the University and complete detours or other temporary measures prior to the starting of other work. G. Provide and maintain suitable temporary barricades, fences, or other structures as required for the protection of the public, traffic, and personnel about the work site; provide walks around any obstruction made in public places; and maintain sufficient light on or near the construction to protect workmen, travelers, and other personnel from injury during all hours of darkness. 1. Provide all barricades with battery-operated warning lights during hours of darkness. 2. No lighting with open flames will be permitted. H. The Subcontractor is responsible for all damage to utilities, streets, curbs, and gutters resulting from its work, and shall at its own expense repair all such damage at the completion of the work, or sooner if directed by the University. 1.07 PARKING A. Subcontractor's Vehicles: 1. Park construction vehicles and equipment only in construction areas completely off the existing Site roads, or in areas designated for parking within the construction limits. Access for other types of vehicles may be requested through the University. Section 01130 LLNL Facilities Specification June 1, 1992 , 4 _ 2. Keep cranes, booms, drilling rigs, and similar tall equipment clear of overhead electrical conductors. The Subcontractor shall be responsible, and shall hold the University harmless, for any damage or injury caused by unsafe acts of its operators. B. Personal Vehicles: Parking space for the private vehicles of the Subcontractor's personnel will be available within the established parking lots on the Livermore Site, or entirely off the Site. No private vehicles are allowed into any other areas of the Site, except as specifically stated in the Special Provisions or with the permission of the University. The Subcontractor shall transport its personnel to the job site in Subcontractor's own vehicles. PART 2 PRODUCTS Not used PART 3 EXECUTION Not used END OF SECTION Section 01130 LLNL Facilities Sneci cadon June 1, 1992 1 5 " Appendix C Site 300 Endangered Species Program Contents Document Evidence for Mitigation Measure No. Brochure: Site 300 Endangered Species,How You Can Protect Them......:................ 7.2.6A Poster: Site 300 Special-Status Species,How You Can Protect Them........................ 7.2.6A Plant Engineering Form 1 (Mechanism for Enviromental Review) .............................7.2.6B Procedure No. 300 Off-Road Travel Restrictions (from the Site 300 Operations Manual) ......................................................................................7.2.6E Vehicle Operation at Site 300 .............................................................................................7.2.6E Sounding Warning Prior to Detonation (from the Site 300 OperationsManual) ....................................................................................................7.2.6E Policy Regarding Access to the Amsinckia grandiflora....................................................7.2.6H Letter to William McConachie from U.S. Department of the Interior and attached LLNL proposal re: Restoration of California Native Perennial Grasses and Amsinckia grandiflora at Site 300.......................................7.2.6H Pesticide Operations at Site 300..........................................................................................7.2.6J Sensitive Species Implementation Plan Flowchart............7.2.6L, M,N,O,Q R,S,T,U,W Sensitive Species Survey Forms............................................7.2.6L, M,N,O,Q R,S,T,U,W Interdepartmental letterhead DEFENSE SYSTEMS/NUCLEAR DESIGN Mail Station L-20 Ext: 3-6806 December 4, 1991 ESH 91-276 TO: Distribution FROM: George H. Miller SUBJECT: SITE 300 ENDANGERED SPECIES BROCHURE Nuclear Design has produced a brochure to aid in the identification of endangered species that exist or could potentially exist at Site 300. The two species highlighted, the large- flowered fiddleneck and the San Joaquin Kit Fox, are protected under the federal Endangered Species Act and the California Endangered Species Act. Information is provided in the brochure to help employees recognize these two species and to increase awareness of the steps to be taken to protect them. Please contact Sally Twisselmann at extension 3-0803 to obtain additional copies for distribution to your Site 300 employees and visitors. The Laboratory is committed to preserving these species and their habitat, which have co- existed with the operation of Site 300 since 1953. Your assistance is requested in continuing our efforts to preserve the Site's natural resources. George H. Miller Associate Director Defense Programs/Nuclear Design Distribution: M.Anastasio C. Beiderman J. Davis D. Fisher C. Gatrousis A Grissom D. Nowak D. Sewell R. Werne L. Woodruff J. Davis, DOE/SF E. Keheley,DOE/SF W. Warner, DOE/SF D. Rhodes, DOE/HQ DP-65 University of Califomia ® Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Interdepartmental letterhead Mail station b 871 Ext: 3-1396 SITE 300 ADMINISTRATION August 7, 1992 TO: Site 300 Personnel FROM: Milt Grissom SUBJECT: Site 300 Endangered Species The attached brochure entitled, Site 300 Endangered Species,How You Can Protect Them ,was produced to help Site 300 personnel to become familiar with and hopefully identify a number of endangered species that may inhabit the Site. We need your help in identifying any of the species shown in the brochure and reporting those findings to my office at 3-1396. Your participation is appreciated. NIfiff Grissom Site 300 Resident Manager File Jim-1 Universityof California Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Livermore Site 1993 Projects. Mitigation Measures Plant Facility a Number Project Status T 7 c'! 7 P1. (PFN#) Title As of 9/30/93Zr W m co co 01192001 DSA Cluster Complete # # #-2 # # 01193001 Concr Rip-Rap At Arroyo -TFA Complete # #-1 #-2 X NA-2 11193021 8111 Vault Sensors Complete NA-1 #-1 #-2 NA-1 NA-2 11193022 VV-SMAB-9NG CA Valves-Rept Complete # #-1 #-2 # NA-2 11693002 Develop Spec And Reroof 8116 Design/Const NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 # 11793003 Reroof B117 Design Only NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 # 11992001 8119 Enclosure Complete NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 NA-2 12192014 EG&G Move In Progress NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 # 12193001 8121 Sprinkler Deficiencies Complete NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 # 12393001 6123 Projection Room AC Design/Const NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 # 12591003 8125 Enclosure Complete NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 NA-2 12591003 8125 West Cafeteria Complete # # # # # 12593001 8125 Temp Storage Complete NA-1 #-1 #-2 NA-1 # 13191019 Ground Heat 92 Complete NA-1 # # NA-1 # 13191019 Ground Heating Design/Const NA-1 # # NA-1 # 13191037 Room 2609 Doorway Complete NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 # 13193022 8131 Shelter Design NA-1 # # NA-1 NA-2 13287001 DPRF/NTTC Ftgs & Struct Stl Complete # # # # # 13287001 DPRF/NTTC Building Shell Complete NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 # 13287001 NTTC Off/Lab Interior& Centr Pit Complete # # # # # 8133 13287001 DPRF Office Interior Complete NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 I # 13287001 DPRF Lab Interior . Design NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 # 13287001 DPRF/NTTC Offsite Utilities Design X # # X NA-2 13287001 DPRF/NTTC Site Improvements Design X #-1 # X NA-2 14192009 Transformer Removal Complete # # #-2 # # 15193009 8151 Security Downgrade Complete # # # # NA-2 15193015 B151 Security Downgrade Design X # # # NA-2 15193022 8151 Limited Area Design X # # # # 15391007 8153 Mezzanine Remodel Complete NA-1 # # NA-1 # 15393010 Move Clean Room Complete NA-1 #-1 #-2 NA-1 NA-2 15491006 8154 Remodel Complete NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 # 16893003 8168 T-101 Design 70%Comp X # # X # 17093001 AERF Utility Extension Design Design X # #-2 X # 17093003 AERF A/E TI &Til Design Design X # # X # 17093006 AERF A-7 Utility Bundle Construction # #-1 #-2 # NA-2 17093006 AERF Building-Construction Design (Title 1) X # # X # 17193110 Replace Chiller 8171 Design/Const NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 # 17593002 B175 HV Power Supply Complete NA-1 #-1 #-2 NA-1 NA-2 19092002 8190 Room Addition Procurement NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 NA-2 19192011 8191 Facility Const Activities Construction NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 # 19193002 8191 Eyewash Corrections Complete NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 # 19193003 B191 Chem Storage Upgrqade Complete NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 # Draft 4/6/94 Page 1 mm Liver Proj List.rev 1 Livermore Site 1993 Projects. Mitigation Measures Plant Facility Number Project Status T a `�' T `4 (PFN#) Title As of 9/30/93 v( D (D 00 ccoo 19193008 B191 Rm 1149 Modifications Construction NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 # 19193009 8191 EVA Upgrades Design/Const NA-1 #-1 #-2 NA-1 NA-2 19193013 8191 Facility Elect Construction NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 # 19393001 B193 Freeze Protection Power Complete NA-1 #-1 #-2 NA-1 # 19791001 B197 Mechanical Work Constr Complete NA-1 #-1 #-2 NA-1 NA-2 19791002 6197 Chiller Support Construction # # #-2 # # 19792004 8197 Oxygen Deficiency Constr. Complete NA-1 #-1 #-2 NA-1 NA-2 19792006 UPS Bypass For TELOS Constr. Complete NA-1 #-1 #-2 NA-1 NA-2 21592001 Educational Trailer For 8219 Design/Const # # #-2 # # 21593001 Disconnect T2153 Construction # # #-2 # # 22493002 Relocate Drains Complete NA-1 #-1 #-2 NA-1 # 22593001 B225 Modifications Construction # # # # # 22791004 8227 Retention Tanks Complete # # # # # 23191012 B-231 VPL Complete # # #-2 # # 23191013 B231 Exhaust Hood 2 Support Complete NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 # 23192008 8231 R1 U3/235 R1 U1 Design 70%Comp X # # X # 23192015 B231 D1U1/D2U1 Design Comp. X # # X # 23192027 B-231 Remove/Rep] HVAC Equip. Complete # # #-2 # # 23193010 B231 Hood Complete NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 # 23193010 B231 Humidifier Replacement Complete NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 # 23193019 8231 D1 U1 Design Comp. X # # X # 23193033 8231 Air Condition Unit Installation Complete # # #-2 # # 23193036 Repair Asphalt On East Side Complete # #-1 #-2 # NA-2 23293001 8232 RAP Design/Const # #-1 #-2 # NA-2 23391003 B233 Re-Roof Design/Const NA-1 # # NA-1 # 23392006 B233 TSD Facility Scope Complete # # # # # 23492001 8234 Augmented Scope Complete NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 NA-2 23493001 6234 Refurbishment Title I, II, III Design NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 NA-2 24193011 8241 Electrical Construction NA-1 #-1 #-2 NA-1 NA-2 25192010 8251 R2U1/R2U2 Design Comp. X # # X # 25192013 8251 R1U1/R1U2 Design 50%Comp. X # # X # 25193003 Extend 8251 Fire Bell System Complete NA-1 # # NA-1 # 25392003 8253 Transformer T-720 Construction Title III NA-1 # # NA-1 # 28189013 IB281 Addition In Progress # # # # # 28189013 Chemical Technical Research Complete # # # # # Center 29191001 8291 Tank Removal Complete # # # # # 29192002 8291 Heat Exchange& Pump Design NA-1 #-1 #-2 NA-1 # 29192002 8291 HX& LCW Pump Addition Construction # # # # # 29192010 8291 E1 Al/F1 Al Const Comp # # # # # 29193018 8291 Centra]Control Upgrade Design Title I NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 # Draft 4/6/94 Page 2 mm Liver Proj List.rev 1 Livermore Site 1993 Projects. Mitigation Measures Plant Facility Number Project Status 7 a C`i •: Ci (PFN#) Title As of 9/30/93 r 7 29892003. B298 Waste Retention System Const 30%Comp # # # # # 29893008 B298 R 141 Mods Design Only NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 # 29893012 8298 HVAC Mods Construction NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 # 31092002 B310 Demolition Complete # #-1 #-2 # # 31093002 Rpr DW Valves Southmall Dr. Complete # #-1 #-2 # # 31193005 Supply Student Housing Design/Const # # #-2 # # 31293002 Relocate TFA Water Line Complete # #-1 #-2 # # 31793002 Move Transportainers Complete NA-1 #-1 # NA-1 NA-2 31891002 Pool Filter Replacement Complete NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 # 31892001 6318 G1 U2 Const Comp # # # # # 31893001 DW TB-SMC-3 Flange Gaskets Complete NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 # 31893002 Tie In Sanitary Sewer B318 Design/Const # # #-2 # # 31993002 B319 East Remodel Construction NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 # 32187009 Install Doors HEPA System Complete NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 # 32192005 8321 R101/Rl02/R1 U1 Design 20%Comp. X # # X # 32193007 8321 Security Downgrade Construction # # # # # 32292001 8322 Efficiency Improvements Construction NA-1 #-1 #-2 NA-1 NA-2 32390006 B323 Seismic Upgrade Complete X # X # # 32390006 Fire Station Seismic Construction NA-1 # # NA-1 NA-2 32591001 8325 Construction Complete # # # # # 32593016 8325 1101 Const COMP # # I # # I # 33288071 B332 Office Addition/Renovation Construction # # # # # 33288071 Office Addition Construction NA-1 # # NA-1 NA-2 33290015 450 KW Generator In Progress # # # # # 33290020 8332 Evacuation Alarm Module In Progress NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 # 33290035 Criticality Detectors In Progress NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 # 33290045 B332 Safety& Security Upgrade Design/Const NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 # 33291008 New CAM System Upgrades Design/Const NA-1 # #-2 # # 33291012 Paging System Design/Const NA-1 # #-2 # # 33291014 Sprinkler System Upgrade Design/Const # # #-2 # # 33291028 Downdraft Room In Progress NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 # 33293001 Duct Inspection And Repair Construction NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 # 33293006 Stack CAM Alarms In Progress NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 # 33293007 Seismic Upgrades Design/Const NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 # 33293008 02 Monitoring System Design/Const NA-1 X #-2 NA-1 # 33293012 Install Shield Doors Design NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 # 33493001 8334 Exhaust Duct Modifications Design/Const NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 # 34193012 8341 T1A1 Design 70%Comp. X # # X # 34194002 B341 Chiller Replacement Spec. Design Title I NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 # 34591002 B345 Re-Roof Design/Const NA-1 # # NA-1 # 36192014 6361 Basement Complete NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 # 36193004 Modify Room 1530 Complete NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 # Draft 4/6/94 Page 3 mm Liver Proj List.rev 1 r Livermore Site 1993 Projects. Mitigation Measures Plant Facility Number Project Status r a `" r Ci T T T T T (PFN#) Title As of 9/30/93 cc cc co co 36193006 Install By-Pass On Retention Complete # # #-2 # # 36193010 Modify Rooms 1233 & 1237 Complete NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 NA-2 36193011 Install Bracket, Room 1140 Complete NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 NA-2 36193012 Install Sidewalks& Curbs Complete # #-1 #-2 NA-1 NA-2 36193014 Landscape North Side Of B-361 Complete # #-1 #-2 NA-1 NA-2 36193015 Inst Windows In R1131 & R1231 Complete NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 NA-2 36193016 B-361 Landscape(South-East) Complete # #-1 #-2 NA-1 NA-2 36193017 Landscape Increment III Complete # #-1 #-2 NA-1 NA-2 36194002 Install New Dist Water Unit Complete NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 # 36293001 Zone 7 Emergency Kiosk Complete NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 NA-2 36491002 B-364 Exhaust System Complete NA-1 # #-2 # # 36693012 Emergency Power To B-366 Complete NA-1 #-1 #-2 NA-1 NA-2 37793002 8377 Alteration& Modification Complete # # #-2 # # 37793003 BBR Program Storage Building Complete # # # NA-1 NA-2 37794001 B-377 Modifications Complete NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 NA-2 38193002 8381 Viewing Gallery- Mech Complete NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 # 38193003 New Office 2306 Area Complete NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 # 38193003 Viewing Gallery&Change Rm Complete NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 # 39293001 B392 Conversion Design NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 # 40691001 Install Gas Treatment Pad Complete # # # # NA-2 40692002 Install Discharge Line Complete # #-1 #-2 # NA-2 40693002 Install Boiler Design/Const # # # # # 41093001 B410 City Water Repair Complete # #-1 #-2 # NA-2 41192006 8411 Remodel Office Space Complete NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 # 41192014 8411 Reroof Construction NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 # 41193002 B411 New FACP Construciton # # #-2 # # 41193004 Repair Gas Leaks B 411, 412 Complete # #-1 #-2 # # 41193005 Repair Asphalt South Of B-411 Complete # #-1 # # NA-2 41193006 8411 Title I & II, Room 1305 Design NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 # 41293001 Replace HG Traffic Box Valve Complete # #-1 #-2 # NA-2 41993003 B419 R1 U4/R1 U5 Design 80%Comp. X # # X # 42492004 8424 15KV Lightning Arrestors Design Title II NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 NA-2 42494001 8424 Code Compliance Design Title II NA-1 # # NA-1 # 43192001 Asbestos Removal B-431 Complete NA-1 #-1 #-2 # # 43192002 B-431 Exhaust System Complete NA-1 #-1 #-2 # # 43293001 B-432 Core Drill Floor Complete # #-1 #-2 # # 43293002 New Chiller& HVAC R1100 Complete NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 # 43293003 New Machine Foundation, B-432 Complete NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 NA-2 43293004 Install New Door, Rm 1404 Complete NA-1 #-1 #-2 NA-1 NA-2 44594001 B-445 Extend Pit Complete NA-1 #-1 #-2 NA-1 NA-2 44693002 Install New Door& Insulation Complete NA-1 #-1 #-2 NA-1 NA-2 44693006 lConstruct Two Room B-446 Complete # # # # # Draft 4/6/94 Page 4 mm Liver Proj List.rev 1 Livermore Site 1993 Projects. Mitigation Measures Plant Facility Number Project Status 1: (PFN#) Title As of 9/30/93 v co W 00 CO 44693008 B-446 Conversion (Design) Complete # # # # # 44694001 B-446 Conversion (Const) Complete # # # # # 45103001 Change Controls On PCHW 6&7 Design/Const NA-1 #-1 #-2 NA-1 # 45193002 Extend Halon System Design/Const NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 # 45193003 Remove Y-MP Computer Design/Const NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 # 45193004 New Panel Installation In Progress NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 # 45193005 Convert Doors To Handicap Construction NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 NA-2 45193006 Paint Piping Construction NA-1 #-1 #-2 NA-1 NA-2 49092044 B490 R3U1/R451 Design 80%Comp. X # # X # 49092057 B490 Fire Detection & Alarm Design/Const NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 # System 49191001 B491 Control Disassembly Complete NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 NA-2 Area/R of u rb 49289016 Closed Loop Livermore City Water Complete # # # # NA-2 49291008 B492.Ethanol Transfer Station Construction # # # # # 49293001 8492 R1 U1 Design Design X # X # # 49293006 8490/492 Booster Pumps Design Only NA-1 X #-2 NA-1 NA-2 49392004 B493 Mods Design Only NA-1 X #-2 NA-1 NA-2 49592001 B495 EVA Paging Complete NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 NA-2 49592001 8495 Telephone Complete NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 NA-2 51293001 6512 Conversion Design Title II X X X X # 51392001 8513 Prefabbed Lab Complete X # X # # 51492011 8514 R4U1 Design 70%Comp. X # # X # 51793002 T-200/T-300 SCADA Design Title II NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 NA-2 53191001 8531 Storage Complete # # #-2 # # 59292001 8592 Tank Removal Complete # # # # # 59793001 8597 Corp Yard Upgrades Design/Hold NA-1 #-1 #-2 NA-1 # 61293002 8612 Fume Hood In Rm 101 Design NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 # 61293003 6612 Title I Decon Design NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 # 62293005 B622 D1A1 Design 50%Comp. X # # X # 148292001 T-1482 Rental Unit Complete NA-1 # # NA-1 # 157893003 T-1578 Student Housing Construction NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 NA-2 167792002 T 1677 Modular (T1632) In Construction # # # # # 167792004 T-6952 Relocation (T1632) In Construction # # # # # 170592002 T-1705 Fire Main Constr. Complete # # #-2 # NA-2 170593002 T-1705 D1 U1 Const Comp # # # # I # 172693001 T-1726 Divider Upgrade Complete NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 # 173592001 T-1735 Addition Complete NA-1 #-1 #-2 NA-1 NA-2 187991003 T-1879 Security Upgrades Constr. Complete NA-1 #-1 #-2 NA-1 NA-2 188190002 T-1881 Installation Complete NA-1 #-1 #-2 NA-1 NA-2 188891005 ISupport Furniture Installation JConstr. Complete NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 NA-2 212793001 1 Director's Office Annex (Trailers) I In Construction # # # # # Draft 4/6/94 Page 5 mm Liver Proj List.rev 1 Livermore Site 1993 Projects. Mitigation Measures Plant Facility a Number Project Status r 7 ry r N (PFN#) Title As of 9/30/93 v W cro 218092001 T-2180 4 Plex Lease Trailer Complete NA-1 # #-2 # # 262893002 Relocation Of Sta 475 Design NA-1 #-1 #-2 NA-1 NA-2 262993001 Repair 2629 Sewer Line Complete # #-1 #-2 # NA-2 263289001 T-2632 Complex Design/Const # # # # # 342792001 T-3427 Travel Trailer Complete # # #-2 # # 362693001 Relocate T-3626 Complete # # # # # 362890001 Biomed Modifications Construction NA-1 #-1 #-2 NA-1 NA-2 362890001 Genomics Lab (Site Prep) Complete # # # # # 362891001 Genomics Lab (Modular) Complete # # # # # 362892001 Genomics Lab (Landscape) Complete # #-1 #-2 # # 362993001 Relocate T-3381 Complete # # # # # 367593002 Construct Partition Complete NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 NA-2 372493001 Install CW Isolation Valve T3724 Complete # #-1 #-2 # NA-2 372593001 Remove Broken Catch Basin Complete NA-1 #-1 #-2 NA-1 NA-2 406991003 TFF Activation Complete # # #-2 # # 420593001 T-4205 Relocation Complete # # # # # 437893006 T-4378 Bathroom Remodel Complete NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 # 512920021 Effluent Monitoring Complete NA-1 #-1 #-2 NA-1 # 517693007 [COP Installation Complete # # #-2 # NA-2 547792001 EPD Modular Construction # # # # # 562792003 Replace Sewer Pumps Complete NA-1 #-1 #-2 NA-1 I # 597593002 Pour/Lay Gravel With Asphalt Complete # #-1 #-2 NA-1 NA-2 612792002 T-6127 New Trailer Complete # # #-2 # # 632590001 HWM Modular Design (Title 1) NA-1 # # NA-1 NA-2 632592001 T-6325 Plant Operations Design X # X # # 318 91002 Replace Pool Filters Design/Const # # #-2 # # 318A93001 Design/Build Fitness Center Des. (cancelled X # # X # 3/94) 551E93003 8551 E R1072A Remodel Complete NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 # 90D102(02) 13.8KV LGS & Duct Bank Design # # X X # 90D102(02) A-7 Parking Lot Duct Bank Const Comp # # # # # 90D102(02) U424 Rebuild Design # # X X # 90D102(03) Sandia 13.8KV Duct Bank (1) Construction # # # I # # AIT91003 Install 3 RAP Stations Constr. Complete NA-1 #-1 #-2 NA-1 NA-2 AIT91005 Power Up Computers Constr. Complete NA-1 #-1 #-2 NA-1 NA-2 AIT92002 Fire Sprinklers & LCW Design Complete NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 NA-2 AIT93001 FY 93 Miscellaneous Complete # #-1 #-2 # NA-2 CMP92003 Sitework& Utilities For Nodes Complete # #-1 #-2 NA-1 NA-2 CMP93003 Fiber Optic Communication Design/Const # # #-2 # # Backbone CV193001 C-1 Parking Lot Construction # #-1 # # # EL189004 LGS Electrical Ductbank Net Design X # # X # EL191007 Greenville Road Duct Bank Construction # # # # tNEj Draft 4/6/94 Page 6 mm Liver Proj List.rev 1 Livermore Site 1993 Projects. Mitigation Measures Plant Facility Number Project Status 7 a �`! r N (PFN#) Title As of 9/30/93 v to (o co w EL191014 Replacing Bus Electrical Structure Design (Title II) X # #-2 X NA-2 EL192001 A-7 Electrical Ductbank Complete # #-1 #-2 # NA-2 EL193001 Overhead To Underground Complete # #-1 #-2 # NA-2 Conversion EL193005 11 5K Substation DC Battery Design Title II NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 # EL193007 LGS-37 Battery Spill Containment Construction Title III NA-1 #-1 # NA-1 # EL193008 12KV Overhead To Underground Design Title II NA-1 X X NA-1 # EMG92003 EMNET Installations Construction NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 NA-2 EMG93008 CNG Station Construction # # # NA-1 NA-2 EMG93010 Design Elect Meter Installations Design NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 NA-2 ENG92006 Compressed Natural Gas Station Design (Title 1) NA-1 # # NA-1 # ENV90004 ISewer Diversion (Corr Const Def) Construction NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 # ENV90007 Arroyo Pipeline Procurement NA-1 #-1 #-2 NA-1 # ENV90007 Groundwater Pump Station Procurement NA-1 #-1 #-2 NA-1 # ENV91004 Sewer Diversion Air Agitation Construction NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 # ENV91048 8361 Sump Upgrade Complete NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 # ENV93001 Pipe Cleaning Design Complete X # X # # EPD93001 Areation Pump-Elec Upgrade Construction NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 # ERD93002 Treatment Facility C Activation # # #-2 # # ERD93004 Treatment Facility 5475 Design/Hold X #-1 #-2 X # ERD93005 Treatment Facility D Procurement X #-1 #-2 X # ERD93006 Treatment Facility E Design X #-1 #-2 X # ERD93008 Misc Pipeline Estimates Design X #-1 #-2 X # HAZ91003 Evacuation Paging Upgrade Design (Title 1) NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 NA-2 HWM93005 DWTF LLNL Support Pre-Title I X # X X # ICF93001 Transformer T126/T12 Design/Const # # # # # Replacement ICF93002 Transformer T126/T12 Construction # # # # # Replacement IM92001 IM-DW Mocho Shops Support Construction X #-1 #-2 X NA-2 IM92001 &11DW Mocho Water Line A/E TI Design/Complete X # #-2 X # IM92001 IM-DW Mocho Water Line A/E TIII Design X # #-2 X # IM92001 IM-DW Mocho Water Line Construction # #-1 #-2 # NA-2 Activation IM92001 IM-DW Mocho Water Line Construction # #-1 #-2 # NA-2 Construction IM92001 Livermore City Water Upgrade Design X # #-2 X NA-2 IM92002 IM-LCW Outside A/E TIII Design Design X # #-2 X # IM92002 IM-LCW TI& 11 Design Design/Complete X # #-2 X # IM92003 Crossconnect To Livermore Water City Design X # #-2 X NA-2 IM92003 IM-DW Cross Connection Construction # #-1 #-2 # I NA-2 Construction Draft 4/6/94 Page 7 mm Liver Proj List.rev 1 Livermore Site 1993 Projects. Mitigation Measures Plant Facility Q Number Project Status *• "! N (PFN#) Title As of 9/30/93 cTc coo CO 0 IM92003 IM-DW Cross Connect Design Design/Complete X # #-2 X # TI/TIl IM92003 Zone 7 Pumphouse Design (Title II) X # #-2 X NA-2 IM92004 IM-DW Zone 7 Design TI & II Design X # #-2 X # IM93001 IM-Tank Design TI& II Design X # #-2 X # IM93002 IM-LCW Construction Construction # #-1 #-2 # NA-2 MA090001 WAPA Communication Line To Complete # #-1 #-2 # NA-2 LLNL MBR93006 8318 Sanitary Sewer Tie In Complete # #-1 #-2 # NA-2 MBR93016 Install Cleanout Complete # #-1 #-2 # NA-2 MBR93060 B-319 Stair Replacement Complete NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 NA-2 MCR93003 Repair Asphalt Walkway Complete # #-1 #-2 # NA-2 MCR93004 Sidewalk& Path Repairs Complete # #-1 #-2 # NA-2 MCR93006 Repair Asphalt In Salvage Yard Complete # #-1 #-2 # NA-2 MCR93008 Resurface Parking Lot Complete # #-1 #-2 # NA-2 MCR93009 Resurface C-4 Parking Lot Complete # #-1 #-2 # NA-2 MCR93012 Repair And Resurface 1 st St. Complete # #-1 #-2 # NA-2 MCR93014 Storm Drain Maint. Complete # #-1 #-2 # NA-2 MCR93015 Resurface C-5 Lot Complete # #-1 #-2 # NA-2 MCR93016 Resurface Lot 378 North Complete # #-1 #-2 # NA-2 MCR93021 Resurface D-4 Lot Complete # #-1 #-2 # NA-2 MFD93001 B321 Security Downgrade Design # # # # # MNT93011 8315 Stair Replacement Complete NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 NA-2 MNT93020 Room Layout Modification Design Title II NA-1 X #-2 NA-1 # MNT93031 8223-226 Re-Roof Design NA-1 # # NA-1 # MSC93001 B227 Reroof Design (Title II) NA-1 # # NA-1 # MSC93001 B227 Re-Roof Design NA-1 # # NA-1 # MSC93005 Avenue"A"Reconstruction Construction Title III # #-1 # # # MSC93007 8111 & 131 Chiller Replacement Design Title I NA-1 X #-2 NA-1 # MUE93001 Emergency Repair Mocho Line Complete # #-1 #-2 # NA-2 MUR93003 Repl Nat Gas& Compressor Complete NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 # MUR93004 Replace CA Traffic Box Valve Complete # #-1 #-2 # NA-2 MUR93013 Repair Broken CA Line B131 NE Complete # #-1 #-2 # NA-2 MUR93017 Repair Fuel Tank At B 298 Complete # #-1 #-2 # NA-2 MUR93025 TB-Smc-12 CA Valve Extention Complete NA-1 #-1 #-2 NA-1 NA-2 MUR93028 Rol Comp Air Valve TBDISMMM9 Complete NA-1 #-1 #-2 NA-1 NA-2 MUR93032 Repair B-438 Traffic Boxes Complete # #-1 #-2 # NA-2 MUR93033 CA& NG Valve Deficiences Complete NA-1 #-1 #-2 NA-1 # MUR93039 Repair Storm Drain Complete # #-1 #-2 # NA-2 MUX92039 180/190 Block 10"Waterline Complete # # #-2 # NA-2 MUX93009 Remove Meter At Ballfield Complete NA-1 #-1 1 #-2 NA-1 NA-2 MUX93051 Dig And Locate Traffic Box Complete # #-1 #-2 # NA-2 MUX93052 Clean, Repair Traffic Box Complete # #-1 #-2 # NA-2 PGD91001 A-7 Parking Lot Construction # #-1 # # # Draft 4/6/94 Page 8 mm Liver Proj List.rev 1 Livermore Site 1993 Projects. Mitigation Measures Plant Facility Q Number Project Status 7 T 7 C4 (PFN#) TitleAs of 9/30/93 .- r r CT 0 W CO CO SEC90001 Construct PSO Training Building Design (Title 1) NA-1 # #-2 NA-1 NA-2 SEC90002 Security Administration Building Construction # # # # # SEC92002 Security Lighting Upgrades Completed # # #-2 # # SEC93001 Misc PIDAS Construction Completed # # #-2 # # Sitewide B281/490 Tank Closure& Repl Complete # #-1 #-2 # NA-2 Sitewide Manhole Ducting Complete NA-1 #-1 #-2 NA-1 NA-2 SSR92002 SSR Design Criteria Design X # # X # SSR92003 SSR Excavation/Video Taping Construction # #-1 #-2 # NA-2 SSR92004 SSR Cleanout Installations Construction # #-1 #-2 # NA-2 SSR92005 SSR Point Repairs Construction # #-1 #-2 # NA-2 SSR93002 SSR-Protruding Laterals Construction # #-1 #-2 # NA-2 SSR93004 SSR-M&O Support Construction # #-1 #-2 # NA-2 SSR93005 SSR-Rabilitation Construction # #-1 #-2 # NA-2 SSR93006 SSR-PO Subcontractors Procurement # #-1 #-2 # NA-2 THK92003 Tank Upgrade Design X # X X # TNK92003 Diesel Pkg #1 Const 30%Comp # # # # # TNK92004 B362R1A1/R1A2 Const 50%Comp # # # # # TNK92005 PO For Diesel Pkg #2 Const 10%Comp # # # # # TNK92006 Diesel Pkg #3 Const Comp # # # # # TNK92006 Diesel Pkg 3 Design Design 20%Comp. X # # X # TNK92007 PO Diesel Pkg #4 Const 20%Comp # # # # # TNK92010 B490/B281 TIII Const 0%Comp X # # X # TNK93004 8377 R1 U2 Design Comp. X # # X # TNK93007 8231 D1 Al Const 80%Comp # # # # # Mitigation Measures: 4.1.1 Report cultural resources unearthed 6.1.1A Construction meets seismic requirements of 5481.1 B 6.1.2 Geotech investigation for foundation and drainage 8.1.1 Reduce fugitive emissions(waterspray,cover soil) 8.1.2 Design each project to minimize criteria pollutants Mitigation Measure Implementation Code: # Implemented on this project. 1 Seismic design criteria met with no specific actions required. 2 Existing geotechnical investigation data for the site was utilized. X Applies to this project and will be implemented at appropriate phase. NA Does not apply to this project for one of following the reasons: 1 No ground disturbing activity involved. 2 Equipment which would release criteria pollutants was not involved. Draft 4/6/94 Page 9 mm Liver Proj List.rev 1 o> rn rn rn rn o) rn rn CPT T T T rnCl T T T T C EZ'9 z z z z a z z z z z z z z z z z z z z " z N _ _ m �Z,g a X at X < < a a a a a X at X X < se ac as a X y Z Zi I Z - N N N N 7 7 N N N N N N N N r N N N N N M9'Z'L ¢ ¢ ¢ < < < < ¢ ¢ < ¢ ¢ ¢ < x ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ < < a` z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z 0 N N N Nr r N N N N N N N Nr N N N N N A9'Z'L < < < < < < < ¢ < < < < < < x < < < < < < to z z z z z z z z z z z z ' z z z z z z z z N N N N r r N N N N N N N N r N N N N N E f19'Z'L ¢ ¢ < < < < < < < < < < < < x < < ¢ < < a E z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z N N N N r N N N N N N N N r N N N N N 197L < < < < < < < < < < < < < < x < < < < < < z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z N N N NN N N N N N NN r N N N N N S9'Z'L < < < < < < < < < < < < < ¢ x < < < < < < z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z N N N N N N N N N N N Nr N N N N N 1i9Z'L < < < < < < < < < < < < < < x < < < < < < z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z N N N N N N N N N N N Nr N N N N N 09'Z'L < ¢ < ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ < ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ < x ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ z Z z Z Z z Z Z z Z z z Z Z z Z z z z z i d9'Z'L a x a x < < a a a a a x a x x < a a a a x z z Z 3 N N N N N r r N N N N N N N N r N N N N N ciso9'Z'L < < < ¢ < < < < < < < < < < x < < < < < < z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z C N N N N r r N N l I N N N N N N r N N N N N N9Z'L z z z z z z z z z z z z z z >,I z z z z z z r N N N N 7 7 N N N N N N N N r N N N N N W9'Z'L z z z z z z z z z z z z z x z zj zj z zj z CYN N NN N N N N N N r N N N N N ,9zL z z z z z z z z z z z z z z x z z z z z z CD rn ro 89Z'L a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a as a a a a d Z-4 ft N N N N N N N N N N N N N N NN N N N N 3t 3E ft SG 7L A 36 :t ii * 7t :m 3i # ft +X A ft # V l'Z'9 ae a a a a a 7 a a at a a st at a at a at at a m OaZb z z z z z z z z z z z z z z x z z z z z z cc m co cfl cc '9 m m m '9 co co co T m co co m co cc 9ZZ'b z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z a < < < < < a x x < < < < x �Zb z z z z z z z z z z z z z o c c c 0 c c m m m m m m •� m m m m c _m m Q (D _m m m m 2 `m m y m c _m a) a) m m a � E E E E E E a 12 c E E c E H E E E y c E o c o c o 0 0 0 0 0 o c o o m o 0 0 0 o c rn U w U w U U U U U U v w U = o U U U aU U w cu 0- _ r - - d °n m E ¢O ILL CL C) c U to ~ ~ U c U c = 0 0 m o c m - c ¢ 0 m 0CY m coa c ca C d m 2 E 0 f00 m LL m cc d c at p F y F c ~ ..I � N Y QCL cc F ro m M c 2 m c m L ¢ m m C m .O c v° c w` ro o v a we a v y F LL _ a 3 2 a _ 3 U c m ai ro 3 ¢ M aUi > _> cC ¢ c0 2 > v = > 2 m ro ami v o > Q1 CO w Fr w w 0 w CD — N C0 c n21 CA 7 C O Lf) — O O r O O O N N O O f`7 O to CC) O Go co co eco m m co U co C7 co co U co cocot co C7 ao N co v t0 CD CO N N N C'7 N I� M r CO N Ch C= S O O S S S S S S S S S S S S I LC)l S o O 8 8 8 Q m V E z N N C7 C7 M C7 C'7 m Cl) C') Cl) M Co Cl) N co 8 f7 M :� a m Ea rn rn rn c) rn rn rn rn rn rn rn 0) rn rn 0) am 0 rn 0) M O N O N n O 0) a R O l{7 01 IC) m LL Z O O O O O O O N N N m Cl) co C a IA to In CO O coFn co o co co co Co Co co co co W w w co Co w w O co Co D rn rn rn rn T T QT CPT T q, TI rn q rn T Qrn 9 EZ8 z Z z z z z Z Z z z z Z Z Z z z # z z N > 4) i `Z$ x z x z z a Z x x x x a x a Z x a Z x ui N r N r r N N CO r N N NN N N N N 0 1 p M9'Z'L c < ¢ < ¢ ¢ ¢ a ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢l I l I ¢ ¢ ¢ < a ¢ < X a Z z z z z z z Z Z z z z z z z z z z z z 0 N r N r r N N r N N N N N N N N � � r A9'Z•L < < < < < ¢ ¢ < < ¢ ¢ < < ¢ < < < < < x z z Z Z z z z Z z z z z z z z Z Z z z N N7 N r N N7 N N N N N N N N 1C1 E ns'Z'L < < < < < < < a < < < ¢ < < < < < < < < X E z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z N N N N7 N N N N N N N N 19•Z•L ¢ < < < ¢ < < - < < < < < < < < a ft :a < x Z Z Z z z z z z z z z z Z z z z Z N 7 N 7 7 N N M N N N N N N N N M M S9'Z•L < < < < < < < < ¢ ¢ ¢ < ¢ < ¢ < < < < < x z z z z z z z z Z Z z Z z z z z z z z z N N N N M 7 N N N N N N N N M M as Z'L z z z z z z z z z z z Z Z Z Z z z z z z x N N N N M 7 N N N N N N N N M M < ¢ < < < < < ¢ < < < < < < < < ¢ < x z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z i d9ZL x z x z z a a o Z x x x x = x °t Z Z z < X < < X 3 N N r N7 r N NC? r N N N N N N N N M M C13 09'Z•L < < < < < < < ¢ < < < < < < < < < < < < X z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z L N r N r r N N M r N N N N N N N N M M r N9•Z'L < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < X z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z N 7 N 7 7 N N N N N N N N N N C7 M W9 Z L z z z z z z Z z z z z zl l l z z z z Z z z x N r N r r N N7 N N N N N N N N 19'Z L z z z z z z z Z Z z z z z z z # z X N d rn OWL a as as ac as sa g x a a a as se sx as sa u a a ac fta y.Z.9 N N N N N N N N N N N # N N N N N A N N Y 7i 3L i! 3G A 7t ix .7L 3C 32 7i 7L VL-Z-9 a 7 a x 7 a ax a a I :m a ss a a xs 't 7 7 a s6 ak 19 7 O O O 7 O O O O O 7 7 7 O 7 O OZ Z b < < < < < < < O < < < < < < < < < < < < < z z z Z Z z z z z z z Z Z Z z z Z Z Z Z p CD (O CO t0 O O M (D O T T T T T (O T O CD O 8ZZ'b z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z lZ b X z # z z a -M " z X x ¢z x a x z z z a z x 0 c C c 0 c c o 0 0 = c o m a� m m m 0 u Z a) m c d y m O d 4) C C C d a Y E E E E E c E C C (� N N' c E y N E E c E cl E cn w U U U U U U U U 0 0 0- w 0 0 0 U w U U w ca acct a O c 0 N al O E (j OC — � __ YOa c U E U O V On a) Na) co a) m Q t m ¢ E 0 c 3 ami d mQ. _ d V ca = y c N m a' `m m m LL m x E 'v m E d h c .0 c c 1= 0 ( 3 y F" E aci d (u ¢ .O y Zi 0 m 0 ) d � F ¢ 0 •� � E J w LL o w a c0 LL m U N E E S E cc .0 cli col en _� t 5 < Ln cc 0) w co 0 a) w (} c g a 3 O U U U w LL `m fn U M U d7 0 c 0 � M M v (3) o o (n rn rn d rn O n n CC) n n n n w m m O 0 N C conw U to M co m (n U) M CO as ao w U) O F p p co Cn co M N C7 N n co N V in to N co N M p p � '�Z 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 Op Cl) V E tL fh M Cl) Cl) Cl) M Cl) Cl) co M co co M co Cl) N M Cl) Cl) r a as 7 a CA CA (A CP O� CP Cn Cn CA CA CA CA m O 0, m O a' rn 0) O Cl) co Cl) Cl) C CA O O N (f) CA CT Q< N LL Z nm nm ano ano m m m nm W Co ano m m cOoo a°DD m co 00 co W W 0 (A Q1 T O� O� CP O� O� O� 01 Of 01 01 EZa = z z z # z z z z z z z " z " z z z z z m LZ'8 x X X Z Z X a X x Z a ac a st X as vi N N N N N N a0 Ln N to N N N N a0 N N Q a < x a Q O ¢ x a Q Q < ¢ < x a a` z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z 0 N N N N N N Ui N to N N N N N N A9'Z'L < a < < ¢ < = x < < O < x Q < < < _ < x < z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z co N N N N N N to N to N N N N N N E n9Z'L < < < ¢ < < x < < _ < x ¢ < < < _ < x < z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z N N N N N N N N N N N N N 19'Z'L ¢ < < < < < as x - < a se x < < < < < x < z z z z z z z z z z z z z N N N N N N M Cl) N C? C? N N N N C`7 N N S9'Z'L Q < < ¢ a Q Q X a < Q Q x ¢ Q < < ¢ a x < z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z N N N N N N C7 M N C`9 M N N N N M N N a9Z'L Q Q a a < < < x < < < < x ¢ < ¢ < < < x z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z N N N C`7 C? N C7 C7 N N C?l<N N < N N 09'Z'L x x x < < < < x ¢ < < < x Q < < < < x < z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z N N N r i d9'Z'L z z z z z a as x x a ft ac X Z Z a as a a x x 3 H N N N N N N m Cl) N C7 C7 N N N N Cl) N N 09'Z'L < < < < < < < x < < ¢ < x < < < < Q < x < z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z N N N N N N n M N M M N N N N Cl) N N m N9Z'L 4z z z z z z z X z z z z " z z z z z z x z N N N N m C7 N (`� C7 N N N N C`7 N N W9'Z'L z z z z z z z x z z z z x z z z z z z x z N N N N N N N N N N N N N l9'Z'L z z z z z z x z x z z z zat z x z < m rn 89Z'L sc a ae a a sa as a as x at as I x a as a ae a ae x ac ZZ-9 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 3e 3t 3t 7i *6 *6 7t 3t *6 ss R :4 *6 A :s� *6 4 77 -7 7d 1 7 LZ'9 $ $ at ft at 3s a as a x6 ak ds -n ak ae sk as a6 sk se co cc n m cc m m n co7 7 co to <c n n OZZ'b ¢ < x < ¢ < ¢ ¢ < < < < x < < < < < < < O z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z Co m n m m Co Co m m n m m m Co m co n r� 8Z717 < < x < < < < < < < < < x < < < < < < Q O z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z LZ'b sx a X at < ac ac x x at a ac x < < x at sc x x x z z z c 0 0 0 0 - o u m m m m m U m m m m m m m N 0 C C C m N 7 C 7 d 7 m C 7 C y d d d N d a a, N N NE c E c N c E c E m c w E E E E E E N O ❑ ❑ U U U U O U U U U ❑ U O U U U U U U � s _ F n N o = Ltocc CD cr o L ` Ny LL LL Ena ci d ca tf •OOm CL W m O O fCL a) 0Ua N j ❑ N o ° d O a o E U) crm > m ca d m AL m co O a cmCn E U m m �' W U 5 m m d ~ m m rn C7 m `� m C7 N Q - T ¢m m m LL ►- c m c Y Cn c d a. m c 0 ~ W v 0 CIS m ¢ R c c U m c CO) cc .N r .- r r r .- U- LL c0 N y N Q m OC LL c oC CC cc ¢ ¢ ¢ `c `c o E2 E c c a10 m T. x O LL O LL LL LL LL LL LL LL O O Cn 7 r0 c co W Cn a. Cn to fn fn co Cn co U U w O a. J Q co W lL a 0 W LC\IC\J C7 to N CO C7 M _ pn cn p vaNO O O O O O pO_ O S co N O N N C07 C07 M 8COjMRV ELL N CO a) 01 Ot O� O� Ot O) OtOta 0 7 C rnrn rn ►- x m m m m m m m O CAC)to "'_ z z z z z z z a a a o N L'Z 8 st a x a m yr i C C O —_ CP N Cn O U M9'Z'L ¢z z x z 3 N o oHo o. CA C U O N In C O A9•Z'L ¢ x ¢ 3 'u c Z Z o 2 c N a co E CY 4? f19'Z'L ft ¢ x ¢ o `o cps m E Z Z a) _j rnd E N a $ ro = o 19'Z'L a ¢ x ft !c a n m $ ,n > Z p a p c m c c C) N C? 'a) .- w O d C1' N S9'Z L Z Z x Z ap ° 3cu E o d a) a N N O C? N co 3 m 0 'c > a) m o c 3 d9z'L z z x z a .y o Cl m 'D C N C C O N d ca d E _ `c � r n d � •o cca c �° M N C7 ; is t O y 7 09'Z L Z Z x z U o 0 o d O 'ol o y c d y a (0 — N y co a) m O x N O 3 O a7 d d9'Z'L = x a 0 c aci r > o Z Y y T c $ O O N _ U 3 = (p a) O C a_ U Z QN7 U CU C7 N C7 3 •� E C > a N a N U) ` R N d 09'Z'L ¢ Q x ¢ d (n '� O '� m n 2 = F o a v m Z Z Z 0 a Q@ c o n N d U S 0 C? N C`7 C d p C �` a C a) n , Z a O @ N9Z'L qz l x Z ° (D .0 .E y.o > a) 3 r o � v', E 3 m o c U d r o. M 0 '= c � �' � co `o r M N C) C a O) Q) N N CO C-Y 7 U C L W9'Z'L x E r ai app $ o L a o >,m 3 m m c 3 > ? Z aci aai co E N E E Oao $ x a N N E (M a uam p0ooOdco �cm x o cn a' a, v) w aaaoz0zZZmza Yw y y CO E cn o 99'Z'L a a as as c Cl.r N Z Q r N V) v Ln cc n co CD a o — N N N N O Z'Z 9 ss s as s6 �'a x 0 d L'Z'9 as se 4t a) C CD r r�- w N �ZZ'b Z Z z Z d C O N CD (O n (O N 7 BZZb Z Z z z 4 N C 47 L LZ'b Q x x c $ E m -2 c z C.) m can) O c rn r N ` •O Y� N r9 a) C to O C ap a 7 y C C m C 'O C C) m Off 0 a7 d a) Q CLo O c C . L - N m to 0 7 N W OC7 C Z' O O C U 011 C O > C C? d d N G:p O W d U N Of > > N $ a a) O. `•O) E E E E 7 ca N •O •e O O N L N C N N O CV O > /a N U U U U v N a) c m o co 2) = c m E v y c m m CD $ c m o c X a E r $ -, c .T y. c o a) U) (n 3 c d m 3 p o o c co 'D C7U N N N ID in ap0i m r y x a :� en m o v 3 E m N v of V $ 3 `�° 0 0 0` o p> M .3 Ca m 0 S > E a) N O p N O C`1 y m ._: - y C cc cu U X o O E > > 'p N C C C Y Y > 7 in j N d 0 N d a) N C a O U d N p .- C p y c m E C .a Cn N V w m `e a) y o `-' `m c 3 x a) a a $ cn v) -p o g W m E m ~ Es CC O C r N N E N O _O > > N CL 0. 'O 0 >' C O ` C ° E `a o anal 0 .O o j 0 CL-0 p` c r c y _ p c N rn - rn= t d d c ° S 2 0 's `o o T 0 0 c ns rn U c . M m o m p co ? '5 t y p c c w c •o 0 3 fU $ w m a w c c o $ ' p o v a c 0 o c 3 � rn d CD coof Y Y m O E C m y Cn a Co.)O c O1 ca ° v d mu Eu. moa m -j2z0CLacc r- » 3 CL O)r N N N CD CD 0 W CO C0 cD W CO CD CD 0 r Ch ccLL Z a N N N N N N N N " N w N N N N N N N N N Ul v v v cc cc rn rr rn rn r� r,: r_ r.: r,� r� r: ao Ce . a Appendix D Water Conservation Program Contents Document Evidence for Mitigation Measure No. WaterConservation Policy ..............................................................................................12.1.1A Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory University of California Water Conservation Water Conservation Policy Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory is committed to reduce water use during this time of drought and to always use water in a wise and conservative manner. Beginning in 1988 LLNL began cutting back on water use by implementing several water conservation measures still in place today. This year we will cut back even more by continuing with past efforts and implementing new ones. The following water use limitations will be followed: 1. Reduce landscape watering to a point 35% below 1989 levels. 2. Reduce blowdown in cooling towers to minimal operable levels. 3. Limit use of car wash to only essential use. 4. Do not wash down sidewalks, walkways, driveways etc. with water. 5. Use reclaimed groundwater in place of potable water in cooling tower to the greatest extent possible. 6. Postpone all new contracts for additional water intensive landscaping (ie. lawn & groundcover). 7. Monitor all water use to assure no waste or unnecessary use. John H. Nuckolls Appendix E Transportation System Management Program Contents Document Evidence for Mitigation Measure No. Memo Miller to DeGrange re: Transportation Systems ManagementProgram.......................................................................................8.1.6, 11.1.2 Interdepartmental Letterhead Mail Station L-616 Ext: 2-RIDE PLANT ENGINEERING Maintenance/Operations October 28, 1993 TO: Connie DeGrang FROM: D'Anne Mille , ransportation Systems Management Program SUBJECT: EIS/EIR Mitigation Monitoring Program Attached per your request is a summary of the Activities of the Transportation Systems Management Program during FY93. As yet, I haven't written a plan for FY94. If you need an outline, please let me know. University of California LALawrence Livermore National Laboratory Introduction In FY93, LLNL's Transportation Systems Management Program designed an Employer Trip Reduction Plan to increase employee awareness and participation in using mass transit, carpooling, vanpooling, and other means of reducing air pollution and traffic congestion. At this writing, LLNL has approximately 50 vanpools, 300 carpools, 300 bicycle commuters, 8 commuter buses, and about a dozen walkers. It is estimated that 64% of the people working at LLNL drive alone. surveys Each year until 1999 unless compliance has been achieved, employee commute surveys will be required by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District and/or other regulatory agencies. In May, a survey was conducted of employee commute behavior. This survey was required by the County of Alameda to determine LLNL's average vehicle ridership, (the ratio of employees to cars arriving during peak work periods). The results are being compiled by an outside contractor for the County and have not yet been released to TSMP. The survey report will provide information on the effectiveness of the TSMP and will determine whether LLNL is in compliance with AVR standards as required by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District and the County of Alameda. An employee commute survey will be conducted at Site 300 in FY94 to determine AVR at that site. If they are in compliance, no additional plans will be necessary. If San Joaquin County requirements are not being satisfied, a commute alternative plan will be implemented. Employee Outreach & Promotionals From October 1992 to October 1993, the Transportation Systems Management Program conducted campaigns and participated in numerous onsite events to promote commute alternatives. These included two Energy Fairs and one Earth Day Fair, a State sponsored "California Rideshare Week, a "Beat the Backup Campaign," and a"Spare the Air," Campaign. "Beat the Backup," is a special campaign sponsored by TV and radio stations in the Bay Area. It is a large scale effort to register people to pledge to share a ride for at least one day. The purpose of the campaign is to demonstrate how convenient and economical using commute alternatives can be. Approximately six hundred LLNL employees pledged to share a ride during the campaign. The "Spare the Air Campaign," in cooperation with the Bay Area Air Quality Management District, was held August 1 through October 15. This campaign alerted employees to poor air quality on specific days and encouraged the use of commute alternatives in an effort to reduce ozone levels in the air. Transportation Systems Management Program advertised on Lab radio and TV, posted notices in Newsline and placed signs at the gates. An Employee Outreach Program has been developed. The theme is "express your commute." Quarterly posters have been distributed throughout the Lab and at Site 300. A brochure has been developed and distributed to all LLNL employees and is given to new employees in weekly orientation briefings. Numerous articles appear in Newsline on TSMP activities and a carpool/vanpool column runs weekly. New Programs In 1993, the Traffic Safety Policy was rewritten and enforcement of preferred parking for carpools and vanpools was increased. New signs were posted and vanpool and carpool spaces were newly painted. Violators of the parking regulations are ticketed. This action lends credibility to the Laboratory's statement of support for commute alternatives. We have also secured permission for vanpools to park in reserved spaces in limited areas and for 4 person carpools to pick up and drop off passengers in limited areas. Access to the limited areas was in response to numerous requests from employees over the last few years. A major goal was achieved when Transportation Systems Management developed a program to subsidize transit costs for commuters at LLNL. A "Commuter Check" Program was implemented in October, 1993. Eligible transit commuters may receive a maximum of one $20.00 Commuter Check each month that they commute to the Lab on transit. The goal is to increase the numbers of people using transit to commute to work at the Lab. A database will be maintained of all employees participating in the program. This database will provide a system to measure changes in transit ridership. A pilot bicycle locker program for commuters who ride their bicycles to work has begun. The lockers have been received and some have been installed onsite. A survey is being done to determine who actually commutes to work by bicycle. There are an estimated 300 bicycle commuters at LLNL. In addition to purchasing lockers, the program is looking into alternate methods of protecting employees bicycles. Suggestions have been made that Plant Engineering develop overhangs on existing buildings to provide protection from the weather. It has also been suggested that we construct shelters around existing bicycle racks. These suggestions are being considered. Future Plans TSMP has begun background work on telecommuting and flextime programs and plans are being made to develop proposals to implement telecommuting and alternate work schedules where feasible. LUX has developed a small pilot telecommuting project using their equipment in employees homes. TSMP is interested in a more expansive program similar to those used by many organizations outside the Lab, where equipment is more flexible and is determined by job need. Compressed work schedules are also under consideration in different areas of the Lab and in some instances have already been implemented. We have acquired data on alternative work situations and are interested in working with Lab organizations as they develop their plans. Additionally, plans are being made to improve mass transit service for all employees, including physically challenged employees. This will include more bus stops, better buses, and bus stop shelters with telephones around the Lab perimeter. Employees will be able to call a taxi from the bus shelter to take them to their work locations. Rail transportation is expected in the Livermore Valley from both east and west in 1995. TSMP is making plans to provide shuttle service to these trains, either through existing transit companies, or perhaps developing electric or CNG, LLNL shuttles for commuters. . Awards The Transportation Systems Management Program and LLNL received an award from Rides for Bay Area Commuters, Inc. for being one of the 'Top 100 Employers for Bay Area Commuters." TSMP also received an award from The Bay Area Air Quality Management District for participating in the "Spare the Air," Campaign. Appendix F Blast Noise Forecasting Program at Site 300 Contents Document Evidence for Mitigation Measure No. Portion of Procedure No. 300—B-Division Firing Area Access and Muster Control System (from the Site 300 Operations Manual) .......................... 10.2.2 Memo E.C. Draney to John Kleiber re: Weight Limit Forecasting ............................... 10.2.2 Portion of Procedure No. 301—Firing Facility Operations (from the Site 300 Operations Manual)...................................................................................... 10.2.2 Procedure No. 300 -3- 4/20/93 B-DIVISION FIRING AREA ACCESS AND MUSTER CONTROL SYSTEM 3,000 and 4,000 foot radius danger zones have been established for Buildings 801, 850 and 851 (Figures 1 and 2). Buildings 801 and 851 are also surrounded by a fence that establishes a local danger zone. A local danger zone for Building 850 is defined by closure of specific gates on paved roadways. A fragment hazards analysis (Appendix A) is used to determine the test firing parameters for keeping fragments from Class/Division' 1.1, 1.5 and 1.6, cased explosives within the danger zones. These parameters include the weight of the explosive, case material, case thickness, case inside diameter, case density and calculated maximum case fragment'velocity. When a planned explosives test exceeds any of the fragment hazard firing parameters for a 4000 foot danger zone, a supplemental OSP must be written to specify additional controls (e.g., barricades, shielding, larger danger zones, additional observation points, etc.) that will be implemented to assure personnel protection. All Class 1.2 explosive's tests will be done on area muster. The overpressure hazard (Appendix B) is controlled by limiting the impulsive noise exposure to 140 dBA. Appendix B defines the maximum class/division 1.1, 1.5 and 1.6 explosives weights to be, respectively, 104 and 246 pounds for 3000 and 4000 foot radius danger zones. When an area muster explosives test is planned to exceed these limits, controls for additional observers as specified in section F.l.a. shall be implemented or a supplemental OSP is to be written. All experiments will be shielded to preclude fragments, debris, and firebrands from escaping the danger zone. * Class/Division definitions areas follows: 1.1 mass detonating 1.2 non-mass detonating, fragment-producing 1.3 mass fire (i.e., propellants) 1.5 very insensitive explosives 1.6 extremely insensitive ammunition April 20,1993 300/jce LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY-SITE 300 Procedure No. 300 4/20/93 B-DIVISION FIRING AREA ACCESS AND MUSTER CONTROL SYSTEM APPENDIX B HF WEIGHT LIMITATIONS AS A FUNCTION OF DISTANCE FOR 140 dB IMPULSIVE NOISE April 5,1993 300/jce . 17iterdcpanmraal knerhead COMDU-93-0012 March 8, 1993 Mail Station L-281 Ext: 28403 To: Kent Has]am From: John Pastrnak: Subject: Site.300High-Explosive Weight Limitationsbased-on Impulsive Noise (END93-015) As requested, a plot of distance(R) versus high explosive weight(W)has been produced to provide guidance for limiting the impulsive noise resulting from open air detonations.The - reason for this restriction is the 140 dB limit imposed by OSHAI for impulsive noise exposures. The HE weight limits published2,3 previously for Local and Area Musters to comply with the 140 dB restriction agree with and are consistent with the values presented-iii Figure 1.Figure 1 was constructed from BRL data4 of distance versus sound pressure for I to 10,000 lbs TNT.The BRL data is based on a zero vertical wind velocity gradient using TNT explosive charges. A TNT BID-S! equivalency factor of 1.3 is assumed as an upper bound for all high explosives used at Site 300 and-is factored into the data plotted in Figure 1.The following constant scaled distance cube root. relation appears to fit the BRL data quite well: R=585 ' 1._3W) where: R = Required distance(feet)from detonation site where the impulsive noise equals 140 dB over pressure. W = Weight(lbs.) of high explosive. Actual 140 dB limit distances "R" may vary from Figure 1 due to wind speed,direction, temperature,non-zero vertical velocity gradients,and terrain effects which are not accounted for in this guideline.' John Pastrnak Nuclear Explosive&Engineering Division Site 300 Lead Engineer University of California Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Code ofFederal RerulatiQn&U.S.Department of Labor Occupational Safety and Health Administration,§1926.52,item (e). July 1. IM. 2 Baker.C.F.&Pastrnak,J.W.,Rrvi-.ed Site 3001ocal muster area blast and fragment hazard calcUlationsfor buildin, : L 850, and 851.LI.NL internal memo to K. Haslam,April 6. 1992.* 3 Baker,C.F.&Pastrnak,J.W.,Blast Hazard Calculations for ft Site 100 Firing, Areas LLNL internal memo to K. Haslam,November 2. 1992. 4 Perkins,B.&Jackson,W.F.,Handbook For Prediction of Air Blast Focussing,Ballistic Research Laboratories,Rerport No. 1240, February. 1964. Figure 8. page 27. �eeeteel�el■■ei��eel�et■■ll�ee��ee�■■!! ���e■el■■■l�eeele�����li�ee�e���■ i !' ����t■eel�eeeie��el■■U��eeIO�■�/!i iee�■eeel�■��■e■l�eeele���el■lle��■�■■e1��/■i■ �eee1ee11•/■■el�eeeleeleeel■■ll��e�H/�■■!■ -t�■t��■■■/��■t/std■■■�:H•2=i-7�Rcfi'1�L�+1rXl�_K■ SWIMMER �eeel��■■■el�eeel��e1■■ll���H�/■■!■ see �eeelee/�■■■el�eeele�iel■■!!-��%�■■!■ �eeeleelmel■■■l�eeele��el■■ll���I/�■�!■ ■ ■■�e�■��eleel�■�■e��el�ellleee��� M■■!■ ecce■�eeele��el■eele��l���el�ef!!�■� W■■!! �eeeleelH■■■■i�eeeletHel■■!■�ee�Il H�■■■■ �eeeleelHeleleel�eeele�Helelelll�ee��/H�■el!■ �_eeeleel�elele■!�_eeele�l•elelel!!�1_•���■elii • ••• �eeeleelH������eeele�H�%%����eelHet���! �eeeleel�eleleei�eeele��elelel!!� eel=m■■!i • �eeeleel�elele■■�eeele��elelel!■ eel=O■■■ �eeeleelH■■■■■���1•elel■!l�Ieeele�H�■el!■ �ee�eel�e[e[eei�eeele��elelelil��ee�eels�■eli! �eeelcel�■■■■l�eeeleelele!■■!l���ee/��■■!! �ee�eelHeleleel�eeele�He[eI■liel�ee�e�H�■el! � �� �eeeleel�elel■el�eeele��elel■■ ee�e��eu■U �eee/eels■■■■l��e��el■■lee�eelH=NEER �ee�e�■■��■eel�e����elo!■e��eee�■���■■!! ■ee■�eeeleeleeelele■le�e�eeeleel�eler%li��ee�e��e!■eli■ �eeeleel�elel■■i�eeeleel�el�■!l�eeeleei��■■!■ �' �■ee/eelHel■eei�eeeleele/_�el■Ill�ee�eelH�■■!1 �eeeleele■■�■■■�eeel�/e1■■!l�ee�eelt�■■■■ ■■■��tt�■■s�■■■t�� ■tom■■/��it�■■■/ ••• �eeeleelHelelee■�eeel//elel/■l/See�eelH�■el!■ �eeeleelHeleleel�eeleelHeleleli�ee�e�H�■eli■ �����■1■■■ S�■t■■//�■■t■■�t�■Eli/ ee��eeel�el!■e1■eei�e��elelel!!�■ee����■■i■ �■ee�eel�elelee! eeele��elel■!lee��e����■■!■ ��e�■■ee�■���■a��reie■lleee■�e����■■!■ �eeeleel�el/ ■e■eeieeele�Hei■■ii�■■ee1e�H�■■�■ • •• �� iiiii����iiiiii���ii�■ii ��■eel�e�e����et■llseee■���■■an eeeleel��eleeleee■�eeele��elelel!!ee■e�ee�e���elel!■ �eeeleel�eleleeieee■�eeele��ele1■I!!ee■e�ee����eleli■ �■tett■■■/tt■■■�■■����■1■■■�■■■■■�■■�■■■■ ee�■eeeeleeleeel■■■!ee■e�e.��el■■■■eee■�e.���■■i! ��eeeleeleeel■■■■ecce■■eeel��el■■■■�ee�e�eel��■■■■ • Interdepartmental letterhead Mail Station L- 871 Ext: 3-5216 December 14, 1989 TO: John Kleiber FROM: E. C. Draney SUBJECT: WEIGHT LIMIT FORECASTING Effective immediately, weight limit forecasting for all explosives shots should be done using the WIGWAG methodology and the newer SIPS/BLASTO methodology. Any explosive weights fall"i'—ng below either of these weight limit predictions are approved for firing. Explosive weights that are greater than either of the prediction methodology results .require specific approval for firing. It is important that we develop a data base on each shot so that a decision can be made in the future regarding the most appropriate methodology to use in weight limit forecasting for Site 300 operations. I should mention that this proposal has been discussed with Kent Haslam, the Site 300 B-Division Group Leader and he is in agreement. If you have any questions, please give me a call. E. C. Draney Site 300 Resident Manager ECD:gc Distribution: -'S. Cochran/L. Multhauf L-35 E. Fawcett L-871 K. Haslam L-871 S. Kang L-194 J. Lane L-871 D. Turner L-874 File G-30/limit University of California L ■ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Procedure No. 301 -9- 4/93 FIRING FACILITY OPERATIONS S. Pre-Arming- and Arming Authorization a. All pre-arming (connection to the device on the table) at Site 300 B-Division firing facilities shall only be done by a Site 300 B-Division explosives handler. b. All arming (connection to CDU's, firesets, etc.) and firing shall be done only by the B-Division Console Operator. Arming and firing shall be under the direction of the Facility Supervisor. 9. Ignition Source Smoking, open flames, matches, spark-producing devices and lighters shall not be permitted on firing tables or within posted explosives work areas. 10. High J!ressure Systems All pressure systems shall be tested and labeled as safe or unsafe for manned area operations and will otherwise be operated in accordance with the LLN7L Health and Safety Manual, Chapter 32. 11. Explosjygs Weight Limitations/Sound Level Forecasts The Laboratory abides by a self-imposed guideline. that the impulsive noise associated with explosives testing will not exceed 126 dB in populated areas. .Telemetry-equipped balloons, launched from the Site 300 Meteorology Center, transmit weather data that is used in calculating the maximum weight of explosives that can be detonated and still remain within the 126dB guideline. If the combined explosives weight for an experiment does not exceed six pounds TNT equivalent, a sound level forecast is not necessary. Roughly 24 hours prior to a planned test, the Facility Supervisor should request a sound level forecast and indicate to the Site 300 Meteorology Center the combined weight of explosives in the test and auxiliaries such as candles and mirror pads. Procedure No. 301 -10- 4/93 FIRING FACILITY OPERATIONS A forecast is usually made at the beginning of the day of a planned : experiment as a general indicator of conditions and the margin to be expected. Under stable weather conditions (as determined by the Meteorology Center Operator) the accuracy of a sound level forecast is generally considered sufficiently accurate for roughly four hours. If the weather conditions (as determined by the Meteorology Center Operator) are not stable, or if the weather appears stable, but the combined weight of explosives in the experiment is close to the maximum determined by an earlier forecast, another sound level forecast will be made as close in time to the actual experiment as can reasonably be done. If the latest forecast indicates that the 126 dB guideline cannot be met, the experiment shall be postponed. On rare occasions, programmatic needs dictate that the experiment be conducted, even though the forecast indicates that the 126 dB guideline cannot be met at that time. Concurrence by the Site 300 Resident Manager must be obtained prior to conducting the experiment. 12. Personnel Limits on Firing Tables When activity on the firing table directly involves work on explosives, the Facility Supervisor shall minimize the number of personnel on the table to those required to do the work safely. If the activity on the firing table does not involve handling or working on the explosive, the Facility Supervisor can allow more than 20 personnel on the firing table, including workers and observers/visitors. 13. Training 9 On-the-job training requirements for several facility functional responsibilities shall be written and employee progress/status with respect to those requirements shall be documented. The Site 300 B-Division Representative shall maintain records of all firing facility ES&H training. 14. Food and beverages Food and beverages are not permitted on firing tables. Appendix G Waste Minimization Program Contents Document Evidence for Mitigation Measure No. Waste Minimization and Pollution Prevention Awareness Plan .............................. 13.1.3A Status of Mitigation Measure 13.1.3A Waste Minimization and Pollution Prevention Awareness Plan The combined Waste Minimization and Pollution Prevention Awareness Plan was prepared in accordance with DOE Order 5400.1 and is dated May 31, 1992. This plan was originally issued on May 31, 1991,but since then there have been significant changes in regulatory requirements that have affected Laboratory operations. Some changes involved new laws. California passed a law requiring reporting of recycled non-RCRA wastes; the California Hazardous Waste Management and Source Reduction Review Act led LLNL to identify its largest hazardous waste streams and select waste minimization options for them,along with a commitment for their implementation; the Pollution Prevention Act of 1990 required significant modifications to the existing LLNL hazardous waste data reporting procedures;and the Land Ban placed new restrictions on the generation of mixed wastes. Other changes resulted from new definitions, requirements, and restrictions. These include the reduction by DOE of the level of radioactivity that defines waste as radioactive or mixed; new offset requirements for local air emissions that have increased the difficulty of obtaining air permits; an Executive Order issued in September 1991 that requires new emphasis on the use of recycled materials by all federal facilities;California's increased restrictions on the quantities of nonhazardous wastes that may be disposed of in landfills; and the directives by the DOE Secretary to participate in the EPA 33/50 program to reduce emissions of 17 priority chemicals and to submit progress reports on the program,as well as to phase out Class l ozone-depleting chemicals(ODCs)by the end of 1995 and to submit progress reports on this phase-out. With these changes in mind, the strategies proposed in the Waste Minimization and Pollution Prevention Awareness Plan include the following actions. The first is to develop specific ways for the programs to conserve resources, minimize waste generation, and prevent pollution. This includes creating incentives for pollution prevention; developing specific goals and schedules for waste minimization activities; promoting the use of nonhazardous materials; substituting, reformulating, modifying, managing, and/or recycling waste materials to achieve minimal adverse effects; targeting policies, procedures, or practices that may be barriers to waste minimization; and integrating and coordinating waste generators and waste managers on waste minimization issues. The second action is to enhance communication of waste minimization goals and ideas. This involves developing and implementing employee pollution prevention awareness and occupational training_ programs; collecting and exchanging waste minimization information through technology transfer, outreach, and educational networks; and developing mechanisms for fully disseminating current technical information. The third action involves identifying and implementing methods and technologies for waste minimization, such as characterizing waste streams,developing a baseline of waste generation data,and mitigating a research program to identify and test new technologies and products, (e.g., solvent substitution program). The fourth action involves setting goals. The University of California contract with LLNL now handles quantitative waste reduction goals(i.e., 10%per year overall reduction)that are vital in achieving significant waste reduction. In 1992 and 1993 LLNL conducted a number of activities in support of this plan. LLNL continued to communicate management's commitment to curtail pollution, and publicized the goals of pollution prevention through posters and articles in Newsline (the LLNL biweekly newspaper). LLNL conducted formal training on pollution prevention and on the responsibilities of waste generators. Pollution prevention displays and handouts were presented during Earth Week,at two Earth Day Fairs(April 1992 and April 1993),and at an on-site Energy Fair (October 1992). Environmental Alerts (one-page flyers) were published and distributed to all LLNL employees,conveying information on environmental problems and possible solutions, on recommended practices, and on pertinent environmental regulatory issues. Changes and additions to regulatory requirements, new technologies, and management changes related to environmental issues continued to be conveyed in 1992 by the environmental analysts assigned to specific site areas. A hazardous solvent substitution program.was initiated that has to date placed "environmentally friendly" solvents in 18 LLNL shops. The white paper recycling program was expanded,and battery and cardboard recycling initiated. Finally,the LLNL-wide safety and health awards program was expanded in 1992 to include environmental ideas. Waste Minimization The Waste Minimization Project (WMP),assisted by program representatives, prepared the Annual Waste Reduction Report for the Department of Energy on both the Livermore site and Site 300. WMP also updated the 1991 Livermore site SB14 report and submitted a report to Alameda County concerning recycling of non-RCRA hazardous wastes. The reduction of waste has been a major effort at LLNL. As mentioned above, a significant part of this effort has concentrated on both liquid solvents,which are disposed of as liquid hazardous waste,and volatile solvents, which evaporate into the air. Several LLNL programs are collaborating in a project to evaluate the substitution of less hazardous solvents or cleaners for chemicals currently in use. Preliminary results are very encouraging and have led to the elimination of some cleaning operations that used halogenated solvents. For example, Chemistry and Materials Science has reduced by about 70% the amount of hazardous solvents used in radioactive materials management areas, representing a significant reduction in mixed wastes. This reduction is a direct result of employee education and of switching to nonhazardous solvents. Chemistry and Materials Science has also implemented a procedure to remove the chlorofluorocarbon(CFC)solvent from a degreaser whenever the machine is not in use, thereby reducing CFCs lost through evaporation by approximately 250 kilograms per year. The Lasers Directorate reduced evaporative losses of CFCs by switching to a formulation that has a lower vapor pressure and by installing a CFC recovery system. The Lasers program also implemented a system to reuse optical cleaning solutions in Building 490, thereby reducing generation of metal- contaminated wastewater by 2636 kilograms per year, and installed oil-free vacuum pumps to reduce both lubricating oil wastes and system maintenance costs. The volume of hazardous wastewater produced at LLNL has also been reduced through use of Transportable Treatment Units (TTU) to process hazardous wastewater from retention tanks. Since mid- 1992, TTUs have treated 114,000 kilograms of metal-contaminated wastewater from Building 141. Treated wastewater was discharged to the sewer system instead of being hauled off site for disposal, resulting in a cost savings of more than $55,000. LLNL has initiated procurement actions to extend this service to all other qualified waste streams. The Engineering Directorate converted the rinsing operation for the manufacture of printed wiring boards to series flow, which reduced (by about 90%'0) the quantity of its largest hazardous waste stream— contaminated rinse water. This stream was further reduced through installation of a cold distillation water recycling system. The Machine Shop installed a recycling system in Building 321 that has reduced the generation of waste machine-tool coolant by about 90% and eliminated more than 9100 kilograms of waste per year. During its first full year of operation, the Plating Shop rinse water recycling system processed 265 million liters of water and generated only 1100 liters of metal-bearing aqueous waste, a reduction of 99.7%. The Lasers Directorate reduced alcohol solvent use by about 800 liters per year by switching to a nonhazardous alternative cleaner. Other changes in operations, as well as reuse and recycling of materials, have led to substantial reductions in wastes. Personnel from Nuclear Design and from Materials Fabrication at Site 300 continue to recycle and reuse high explosives pieces for shot tank evaluations, microbarograph testing, and employee training exercises. Employees at Site 300 continue to segregate packaging to ensure that only those wrappers that contact high explosives are disposed of as hazardous waste. Firing table gravels contaminated with explosives are also being recycled. Furthermore,pollution prevention measures have been built into synthesis of new chemicals. Energy Research used to store processed oil shale in 55-gallon drums that were used only once,then disposed of as hazardous waste. The program now uses recyclable transportainers to store processed shale that is awaiting disposal. This eliminated more than 550 kilograms per year of hazardous waste. Magnetic Fusion Energy now returns spent insulating oil to the manufacturer, where it is purified for reuse; this reduced oily waste by about 2000 kilograms per year. Plant Operations also ceased regenerating its ion exchanger resin beds on site in 1991. The resin vendor now regenerates these beds off site,eliminating a large wastewater stream contaminated with metals. Automotive Fleet Division of Business Services has substituted reusable stainless steel containers that use pressurized air as propellant in place of aerosol cans at Site 300. This provides an 80% reduction in the amount of waste generated and a savings of $500 per year. Plant Operations now changes compressor and generator lubricating oils only when analyses show high metal content; previously, oil changes followed a time schedule. The Motor Pool started using recapped tires instead of buying new ones for certain vehicles. The Hazardous Waste Management Division sent between 135 and 180 kilograms of metallic lead bricks, hammers, and shot to LLNL salvage operations for off-site recycling. LLNL initiated an alternative solvent and coolants research project to minimize the use of ozone- depleting chemicals, halogenated hydrocarbons, and material with volatile organic compounds. The WMP solicits LLNL programs for parts that are currently cleaned with toxic solvents. After cleaning these parts with alternative solvents, the WMP returns them to the programs with suggestions for alternative solvent use. Substituting less toxic cleaning materials minimizes environmental management and waste management costs,minimizes employee health risk exposures,reduces potential impact to the environment,and correlates well with guidance and objectives from the U.S. EPA. LLNL evaluated the effectiveness of more than 70 alternative solvents for cleaning grease, oil, and dirt from commonly used substrates such as optical glass, aluminum, other machined metals, printed wiring boards, and plastic. Advanced spectrometry methods are used to quantify cleanliness achieved with the various solvent cleaners. In addition, aquatic toxicity tests are conducted on materials that provide promising cleaning results. Several alternative solvents have proved to be not only less hazardous but also better cleaners than the more toxic material currently used. Some of the solvent substitutions to date include: the main bay machine shop substituted a nonhazardous alternative cleaner (815GD) for 1,1,2-trichloroethane (TCA); the Engineering Records Center replaced alcohol with vinegar and water for daily cleaning of the camera bed and is using diluted sodium hypochlorite instead of standard sulfonic acid and dichromate tray cleaner for cleaning processor racks; the Building 141 machine shop substituted nonhazardous cleaner SD1291 for TCA; Plant Engineering switched to 1990GD for spray washing in Building 511; and the Technical Information Department replaced a high-speed printing press with a dry-toner copier(eliminating 102 liters per year of hazardous chemicals). Another type of chemical substitution occurred in the Plating Shop. It replaced its potassium ferrocyanide chromate conversion coating process with a less hazardous noncyanide process and substituted oxalic acid for sulfuric acid in its aluminum anodizing process. TSCA hazardous waste decreased about 6400 kilograms; RCRA hazardous waste increased about 152,800 kilograms; and non-RCRA hazardous waste decreased about 173,400 kilograms. Overall, hazardous waste generation declined nearly 27,050 kilograms or 2.8% during 1992, and low-level radioactive waste generation decreased about 29,030 kilograms or 12%. Mixed waste generation increased about 42,000 kilograms or 40%;most of this increase has been traced to one building's retention tank, which has since been replaced, and the increase can thus be considered as nonrecurring. Transuranic waste increased because of intentional inventory reduction in the plutonium facility and because some of the processing equipment was shut down during part of 1991, resulting in lower generation for that year. Nonhazardous Materials Recycling In April 1991, LLNL implemented a site-wide white paper recycling program that has collected more than 200 tons of paper in its first year. The WMP completed the first of a series of nonhazardous waste assessments. Paper waste constituted approximately 50% (by weight) of the total material sampled. The paper waste was sorted into subcategories, including newsprint, colored paper, coated paper, computer (green bar) paper, and paper towels. Only minor quantities of white paper were observed during the assessment, indicating success with the white paper recycling program. Cardboard comprised the second largest waste stream category. Plastics, primarily polystyrene from food service wastes, comprised the third. Glass and aluminum cans represented a very small portion of the waste stream,indicating that individual employee efforts to collect and recycle these materials are successful. Because cardboard comprises the second largest waste stream, LLNL has implemented a pilot program for cardboard recycling with Biology and Biotechnology, Business Operations, Engineering, Shipping, and Salvage. Also, LLNL has implemented a pilot program within the Environmental Protection Department to substitute rechargeable batteries for alkaline batteries in pagers and other small electronic equipment. The WMP is studying the feasibility of recycling polystyrene at LLNL's three cafeterias. LLNL has established a Buy Recycle Committee in response to Executive Order 12780, which mandates federal facilities to increase use of recycled materials. LLNL Stores now carries a white ledger paper with 50% recycled fiber content,refillable bottles that replace aerosol cans,aqueous-base correction fluid, low-alkalinity dishwashing compound, and refurbished laser printer toner cartridges. The Technical Information Department demonstrated that recycled paper could be used in most copiers and laser printers,stimulating acceptance by many other departments.