Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 09211993 - TC.1 • � � I. C. � Contra TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS "'" Costa FROM: Transportation Committee County DATE: September 13 , 1993 SUBJECT: Report on the County's 1993 Annual Compliance Checklist for the Contra costa Congestion Management Program SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATIONS) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATIONS Find the policies and programs of Contra Costa County, as reported in the 1993 Annual Compliance Checklists submitted to the Regional Transportation Planning Committees (see Exhibits A through. D) , conform to the requirements for compliance with the Contra Costa Congestion Management Program (CMP) , and authorize their signature by the Chair of the Board of Supervisors. FISCAL IMPACT Compliance with the CMP will ensure the County receives its allocation of state gas tax revenues pursuant to Proposition 111 and will maintain its eligibility for other state and federal transportation revenues. These revenues are used for transportation purposes. BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATION As the Congestion Management Agency (CMA) , the Contra Costa Transportation Authority has the responsibility of ensuring local jurisdiction compliance with the Congestion Management Program (CMP) . To monitor local compliance, the Authority has developed two checklists to ensure that the requirements of the CMP are CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: XX YES SIGNATURE RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR X RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE (S) : Tom veers Gayle Bishop ACTION OF BOARD ON SEP 2 11993 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED V OTHER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A UNANIMOUS (ABSENT TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN AYES: NOES: ACTION TAKEN AND ENTERED ON THE ABSENT: ABSTAIN: MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. Orig: Community Development Department ATTESTED SEP 2 1 1993 Contact Person: Steven Goetz, 646-2134 PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERK OF cc: Public Works, Transportation Engineering THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR BY , DEPU Y 1993 Annual Compliance Checklists for the CMP September 13, 1993 Page Two met." one checklist is for local jurisdictions. The other checklist is for the Regional Transportation Planning Committees (RTPC's) . The checklist for local jurisdictionsaskswhether each jurisdiction has met the following three requirements of the CMP: I - Consistency with traffic Level of Service and transit standards; - Adoption of a Transportation Demand Management ordinance; and - Evaluation of the impacts of land use decisions on the transportation system. In addition, the checklist asks whether each jurisdiction has regularly participated in RTPC planning activities and whether there is other information that should be considered in the review of the checklist. Each jurisdiction submits their checklist first to its RTPC. The RTPC's will compile the checklists of member jurisdictions, complete the RTPC checklist, and transmit -all the checklists to the Authority by September 30, 1993 . The County's checklists for each RTPC were completed by the Community Development Department and are attached as Exhibits A through D. The checklists certify compliance with the CMP requirements for each RTPC area. CONSEQUENCES OF NEGATIVE ACTION Failure to approve the Transportation Committee's recommendation will cause the County to be out of compliance with the CMP, cause the State to withhold the County's Proposition ill allocation of gas tax revenues, lead to a reduction in road maintenance projects in unincorporated areas, and may prevent the use of future federal and state transportation revenues in the unincorporated area. SLG:cmplist.bo 'X.. -- ITT A '7CA CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY Jurisdiction Congestion Management Program Costa City Local Jurisdiction Compliance Checklist Mmber of Tr~ansplan C nTdttee . To he filled out and suhmirt d Gy loll-imnE dirtionc Year 1993 1. Participation in Multijurisdictional Planning 1-a. Over the past year,has the jurisdiction regularly participated in activities of the Regional Transportation Planning Committee(RTPC)or other forums established by CCTA, including,as needed,amendment of Action Plans to satisfy requirements for Deficiency Plans? YES NO 2. Attainment of Traffic Level of Service Standards 2-a. Has the CCTA identified,through its measurement of levels of service on the CMP network,violations of adopted CMP standards on freeway segments or at CMP intersections located within the jurisdictions? YES NO No Deficiency Plan Required (go to 3.) ❑ ® ❑ 2-b. If the answer to 2-a. is yes,has the sub-area's RTPC approved a Deficiency Plan or Action Plan amendments satisfying Deficiency Plan requirements for road segments or intersections in the jurisdiction? YES NO No Deficiency Plan Required (go to 3.) If the answer is no,or no Deficiency Plan is required,go to Question 3. 2-c. If the answer to 2-a. is yes,has the jurisdiction designated the segments or intersections for which Deficiency Plans have been approved as deficient and adopted a Deficiency Plan (in the form of an Action Plan amendment) for those segments consistent with Government Code Section 650893(b)? If yes, list segments for which Deficiency Plans have been adopted. YES NO ❑ ❑ Not applicable ^:%CMa-7eCr- April 12, 1993 Page Z i Judsdktton Year Contra Costa Transportation Auffiedly Gmtra to 1993 Congestion Management Program Local Jurisdlcalton CompUaece.Crecklfst CA1t3r 2-d. If Deficiency Plans have been adopted.for road segments or intersections within the jurisdiction,that identify actions that your jurisdiction must undertake,please describe below actions the jurisdiction has taken during the past year to implement adopted Deficiency Plans. Not applicable 2-e. If Deficiency Plans have been adopted for road segments or intersections within other jurisdictions in the sub- area that identify actions that the jurisdiction must undertake,please describe below actions the jurisdiction has taken during the past year to implement those adopted Deficiency Plans. Not applicable 3. Trip Reduction and Travel Demand Ordinance 3-a. Has the jurisdiction adopted and implemented a transportation demand management ordinance as described in the CMP? (requirements are identical to those of the CCTA Growth Management Program) YES NO Mir ❑ Date Adopted 4/21/92 0 id # 92-31 4. Land Use I Transportation Evaluation Program 4-a. Is the jurisdiction participating in the preparation,adoption and implementation of.Action Plans for Routes of Regional Significance consistent with the requirements of the Contra Costa Transportation Authority's Growth Management Program? YES NO April 12, 1993 • Page _T Jurisdiction Year Coote Costa Transportation Authority Cmtra C s ty 1 1993 Congestion Management Program Local Jarisdkation Compliance Checklist 4-b. Over the past year,have traffic impact studies consistent with the CCTA's Technical Procedures been conducted as part of the application review process for all development projects estimated to generate more than 100 peak-hour vehicle trips? YES NO 4-c. Over the past.year,has the cost of mitigating the impacts of land use decisions on the regional transportation system been estimated,consistent with procedures described in the CMP,relevant Action Plans for Routes of Regional Significance,and other materials published by the CCTA? YES NO S. Other Considerations If there is any other information that the jurisdiction believes is relevant to the evaluation of conformity with the CMP, it should be attached to this checklist for consideration by the CCTA. Not applicable 6. Review and Approval of Checklist for Annual Compliance Reporting This checklist was prepared for submittal by. Harvey E. Bragdon Director of Communitv Development (Name) (Title) (510) 646-2026 (Phone) The counciVboard of Contra Costa Countyhas reviewed by completed checklist and found that the policies and programs of the jurisdiction as reported herein conform to the requirements for compliance with the Contra Costa Congestion Management Program. Certified: Date: a yj Title: Chair. Board of Supervisors Attest: A.'ZM WF_CK. April 12, 1993 CnN'#RA COSTA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY EXHIBIT B Jurisdiction Congestion Management Program Local Jurisdiction Compliance Checklist lContra Costa ��t:yl MaFter of West Contra Costa Transpartaticn To be Nled nut and submitted bylornl-i ais&ctionr Ah ory Camnttee Year 1993 1. Participation in Multijurisdictional Planning 1-a. Over the past year,has the jurisdiction regularly participated in activities of the Regional Transportation Planning Committee (RTPC) or other forums established by CCTA, including,as needed,amendment of Action Plans to satisfy requirements for Deficiency Plans? YES NO 2. Attainment of Traffic Level of Service Standards 2-a Has the CCTA identified,through its measurement of levels of service on the CMP network,violations of adopted CMP standards on freeway segments or at CMP intersections located within the jurisdictions? YES NO No Deficiency Plan Required (go to 3.) ❑ ® ❑ 2-b. If the answer to 2-a. is yes,has the sub-area's RTPC approved a Deficiency Plan or Action Plan amendments satisfying Deficiency Plan requirements for road segments or intersections in the jurisdiction? YES NO No Deficiency Plan Required (go to 3.) If the answer is no,or no Deficiency Plan is required,go to Question 3. 2-c. If the answer to 2-a. is yes,has the jurisdiction designated the segments or intersections for which Deficiency Plans have been approved as deficient and adopted a Deficiency Plan (in the form of an Action Plan amendment) for those segments consistent with Goverment Code Section 650893(b)? If yes, list segments for which Deficiency Plans have been adopted. YES NO ❑ ❑ Not applicable. A%CMPQIEQC April 12, 1993 ;'':.Page 21 Jurisdiction Year Contra Costa Transportation Authority tYdty 1 1993 Congestion Management Program Local Jurlsdlcatlon Compliance Checklist �1 2-d. If Deficiency Plans have been adopted for road segments or intersections within the jurisdiction,that identify actions that your jurisdiction must undertake,please describe below actions the jurisdiction has taken during the past year to implement adopted Deficiency Plans. Not applicable. 2-e. If Deficiency Plans have been adopted for road segments or intersections within other jurisdictions in the sub- area that identify actions that the jurisdiction must undertake,please describe below actions the jurisdiction has taken during the past year to implement those adopted Deficiency Plans. Not applicable. 3. Trip Reduction and Travel Demand Ordinance 3-a. Has the jurisdiction adopted and implemented a transportation demand management ordinance as described in the CMP? (requirements are identical to those of the CCTA Growth Management Program) YES NO Date Adopted 4/21/92 Ordirkrm. # 92-31 4. Land Use/Transportation Evaluation Program 4-a. Is the jurisdiction participating in the preparation,adoption and implementation of.Action Plans for Routes of Regional Significance consistent with the requirements of the Contra Costa Transportation Authority's Growth Management Program? YES NO w.-NatPCHEecx. April 12, 1993 r Page 3 Jurisdiction Year Contra Costa Transportation Authority G1tra CosElIxuty 1 1993 Congestion Management Program Local Jurlsdlcatloo Compliance Checklist 4-b. Over the past year,have traffic impact studies consistent with the CCTA's Technical Procedures been conducted as part of the application review process for all development projects estimated to generate more than 100 peak-hour vehicle trips? YES NO No development- projects in Western Contra Costa County were approved which ❑ Q generated more than 100 peak hour vehicle trips. 4-c. Over the past.year,has the cost of mitigating the impacts of land use decisions on the regional transportation system been estimated,consistent with procedures described in the CMP,relevant Action Plans for Routes of Regional Significance,and other materials published by the CCTA? YES NO No development projects in Western ❑ ® Contra Costa County were approved which generated 100 or more peak hour vehicle trips. S. Other Considerations If there is any other information that the jurisdiction believes is relevant to the evaluation of conformity with the CMP, it should be attached to this checklist for consideration by the CCTA. Not applicable. 6. Review and Approval of Checklist for Annual Compliance Reporting This checklist was prepared for submittal by: Harvey E. Bragdon Director of Community Development (Name) (Title) (510) 646-2026 (Phone) The counciUboard of Contra Cosh. 02mty has reviewed by completed checklist and found that the policies and programs of the jurisdiction as reported herein conform to the requirements for compliance with the Contra Costa Congestion Management Program. Certified: 1 � / 4�ld�ZSr Date: .3 T-ttle: Chair. Board of Supervisors Attest: A.,tattateac. April 12, 1993 • f12i EXHIBIT C �Ce l CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY Jurisdiction Congestion Management Program Local Jurisdiction Compliance Checklist Member of Transpac To be filled out and submitted by!oral iuricdi do c . Year 1993 1. Participation in Multijurisdictional Planning 1-a Over the past year,has the jurisdiction regularly participated in activities of the Regional Transportation Planning Committee(RTPC)or other forums established by CCTA, including,as needed,amendment of Action Plans to satisfy requirements for Deficiency Plans? YES NO ® ❑ 2. Attainment of Traffic Level of Service Standards 2-a. Has the CCTA identified,through its measurement of levels of service on the CMP network,violations of adopted CMP standards on freeway segments or at CMP intersections located within the jurisdictions? YES NO No Deficiency Plan Required (go to 3.) ❑ a ❑ 2-b. If the answer to 2-a. is yes,has the sub-area's RTPC approved a Deficiency Plan or Action Plan amendments satisfying Deficiency Plan requirements for road segments or intersections in the jurisdiction? YES NO No Deficiency Plan Required (go to 3.) ❑ ❑ R If the answer is no,or no Deficiency Plan is required,go to Question 3. 2-c. If the answer to 2-a. is yes,has the jurisdiction designated the segments or intersections for which Deficiency Plans have been approved as deficient and adopted a Deficiency Plan (in the form of an Action Plan amendment) for those segments consistent with Government Code Section 650893(b)? If yes, list segments for which Deficiency Plans have been adopted. YES NO Not applicable A:%CMPCHECK. April 12, 1993 Page 2 ' Jurisdiction Year Contra Costa Transportation Authority tl:"a CASta ty 1 1993 Congestion Management Program Local Jurtsdicatlon Compliance Checklist 2-d. If Deficiency Plans have been adopted for road segments or intersections within the jurisdiction,that identify actions that your jurisdiction must undertake,please describe below actions the jurisdiction has taken during the past year to implement adopted Deficiency Plans. Not applicable . 2-e. If Deficiency Plans have been adopted for road segments or intersections within other jurisdictions in the sub- area that identify actions that the jurisdiction must undertake,please describe below actions the jurisdiction has taken during the past year to implement those adopted Deficiency Plans. Not applicable . 3. Trip Reduction and Travel Demand Ordinance 3-a. Has the jurisdiction adopted and implemented a transportation demand management ordinance as described in the CMP? (requirements are identical to those of the CCTA Growth Management Program) YES NO Date Adopted 4/21/92 L h-a,e# 92-31 4. Land Use/Transportation Evaluation Program 4-a. Is the jurisdiction participating in the preparation,adoption and implementation of.Action Plans for Routes of Regional Significance consistent with the requirements of the Contra Costa Transportation Authority's Growth Management Program? YES NO © ❑ A'CNPCHP0L April 12, 1993 Page 3 Jurisdiction Year Contra Costa Transportation Authority trd to ty 19 3 Congestion Management Program Local Jurisdication Compliance Checknsl 4b. Over the past.year,have traffic impact studies consistent with the CCTA's Technical Procedures been conducted as part of the application review process for all development projects estimated to generate more than 100 peak-hour vehicle trips? No development project was approved in YES NO Central Contra Costa County which generated 100 or more peak hour vehicle trips. 4-c. Over the past.year,has the cost of mitigating the impacts of land use decisions on the regional transportation' system been estimated,consistent with procedures described in the CMP,relevant Action Plans for Routes of Regional Significance,and other materials published by the CCTA? YES NO No development project was approved in Central ® Contra Costa County which generated 100 or.more peak hour vehicle trips. S. Other Considerations If there is any other information that the jurisdiction believes is relevant to the evaluation of conformity with the CMP, it should be attached to this checklist for consideration by the CCTA. Not applicable. 6. Review and Approval of Checklist for Annual Compliance Reporting 'This checklist was prepared for submittal by. Harvey E. Bragdon Director of Community Development (Name) (title) (510) 646-2026 (Phone) The 99%a6Wboard of Contra Costa qty has reviewed by completed checklist and found that the policies and programs of the jurisdiction as reported herein conform to the requirements for compliance with the Contra Costa Congestion Management Program- Certified:- rogramCertified: Title: Chair. Board of Supervisors Attest: IV &'04Pateac. April 12, 1993 EXHIBIT D CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY Jurisdiction Congestion Management Program Camra. Costa Camty Local Jurisdiction Compliance Checklist Member of Southwest Area Transportation To be filled out and submit[ d by l�nljuricdicdonc Committee Year 1993 I. Participation in Multijurisdictional Planning 1-a. Over the past year,has the jurisdiction regularly participated in activities of the Regional Transportation Planning Committee (RTPC)or other forums established by CCTA, including,as needed,amendment of Action Plans to satisfy requirements for Deficiency Plans? YES NO 2. Attainment of Traffic Level of Service Standards 2-a. Has the CCTA identified,through its measurement of levels of service on the CMP network,violations of adopted CMP standards on freeway segments or at CMP intersections located within the jurisdictions? YES NO No Deficiency Plan Required (go to 3.) 2-b. If the answer to 2-a. is yes,has the sub-area's RTPC approved a Deficiency Plan or Action Plan amendments satisfying Deficiency Plan requirements for road segments or intersections in the jurisdiction? YES NO No Deficiency Plan Required (go to 3.) ❑ ❑ If the answer is no,or no Deficiency Plan is required,go to Question 3. . 2-c. If the answer to 2-a. is yes,has the jurisdiction designated the segments or intersections for which Deficiency Plans have been approved as deficient and adopted a Deficiency Plan(in the form of an Action Plan amendment) for those segments consistent with Government Code Section 650893(b)? If yes, list segments for which Deficiency Plans have been adopted. YES NO ❑ ❑ (Not applicable) A;M:MPCHECK. April 12, 1993 • Page 2 Jurtsdlctlon Year Contra Costa Transportatlon Authority antro COSHIJxnty X1993 Congestion Management Program Local Jurtsdlcatlon Compliance Checklist 2-dIf Deficiency Plans have been adopted for road segments or intersections within the jurisdiction,that identify actions that your jurisdiction must undertake,please describe below actions the jurisdiction has taken during the past year to implement adopted Deficiency Plans. Not applicable. 2-e. If Deficiency Plans have been adopted for road segments or intersections within other jurisdictions in the sub- area that identify actions that the jurisdiction must undertake, please describe below actions the jurisdiction has taken during the past year to implement those adopted Deficiency Plans. Not applicable. 3. Trip Reduction and Travel Demand Ordinance 3-a. Has the jurisdiction adopted and implemented a transportation demand management ordinance as described in the CMP? (requirements are identical to those of the CCTA Growth Management Program) YES NO Date Adopted 4/21/92 &r irnre # 92-31 4. Land Use/Transportation Evaluation Program 4-a Is the jurisdiction participating in the preparation,adoption and implementation of Action Plans for Routes of Regional Significance consistent with the requirements of the Contra Costa Transportation Authority's Growth Management Program? YES NO tirateac April 12, 1993 Page T r Jurisdiction Year Contra Costa Transportation Authortly COntra COSE74mty 1 1993 Congestion Management Program Loci Jurisdkation Compliance Checklist 4-b. Over the past year,have traffic impact studies consistent with the CCTA's Technical Procedures been conducted as part of the application review process for all development projects estimated to generate more than 100 peak-hour vehicle trips? YES NO Mir 4-c. Over the past.year,has the cost of mitigating the impacts of land use decisions on the regional transportation system been estimated,consistent with procedures described in the CMP,relevant Action Plans for Routes of Regional Significance,and other materials published by the CCTA? YES NO 5. Other Considerations If there is any other information that the jurisdiction believes is relevant to the evaluation of conformity with the CMP, it should be attached to this checklist for consideration by the CCTA. Not applicable. 6. Review and Approval of Checklist for Annual Compliance Reporting This checklist was prepared for submittal by. Harvey E. Bragdon Director of Community D velopment (Name) (Title) (510) 646-2026 (Phone) The ommeWboard of Cants Costa Q!= —has reviewed by completed checklist and found that the policies and programs of the jurisdiction as reported herein conform to the requirements for compliance with the Contra Costa Congestion Management Program. Certified: Date: 1-24 Title: CWr,Board of Supervisors Attest MCUPcrteac. April 12, 1993