The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMINUTES - 07271993 - H.5 H. 5 j -- COC ltl d TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FROM. HARVEY E. BRAGDONCom DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ........ DATE: 25 June 1993 SUBJECT: REZONING APPLICATION - 2994-RZ - Clyde Cola (Applicant & Owner) - requests approval to rezone 13 , 684-sq. ft. of land located in the Pacheco area, from Single Family Residential District R-10 to Single Family Residential District R-6. --------------=----------------=-------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATIONS) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Accept the environmental documentation prepared for this pro- ject as being complete and adequate. 2 . Approve rezoning application 2994-RZ as recommended by the County Planning Commission 3 . Adopt the County Planning Commission's findings as set forth in Resolution No. 27-1993 as the determination for these actions. 4 . Introduce the ordinance giving effect to the aforesaid rezon- ing, waive reading and set date for. adoption of same. FISCAL IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATION: The applicant on March 9, 1992, received approval for a two-lot minor subdivision, with conditions of approval requiring him to submit an application for rezoning the property from R-10 to R-6. The applicant's request was heard by the County Planning Commiss- ion on June 8, 1993 . The Planning Commission, after evaluating the proposal and evidence submitted, voted unanimously to recommend approval of the proposed rezoning to the. Board of Sup rvi rs: CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: YES SIGNATUR RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECO ND ON OF(BrRD COMMITTEE APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE(S) : ACTION OF BOARD ON July 27 , 1993 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED x OTHER This is the time heretofore noticed by the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors for hearing on the above matter. The public hearing was opened and no one appear-ing to speak, the public hearing was closed. IT::'IS BY THE ORDERED that recommendations 1 , 2 , 3 , and . 4 are APPROVED; and Ordinance No. 93-51 is INTRODUCED, reading waived and August 3 , 1993 is set for adoption of same. VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A x UNANIMOUS (ABSENT V TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN AYES: NOES: ACTION TAKEN AND ENTERED ON THE ABSENT: ABSTAIN: MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. Orig: Community Development Department ATTESTED July 27 , 1993 cc: D. Drennan PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERK OF Clyde Cola THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Public Works AN COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR Assessor CCC Fire Protection District v BY-- ------DEPUTY a ;ooPM . REZONING - 2994-RZ CLYDE A. COLA (Applicant Owner) REQUESTS APPROVAL TO REZONE TWO PARCELS FROM SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (R-10) TO .SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (R-6) . SUBJECT PROPERTIES ARE LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF HIGH STREET, APPROXIMATELY 30-FEET NORTH OF 4TH AVENUE, PACHECO AREA. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CONTRA COSTA COUNTY 27 JULY 1993 - 2:00 P.M. TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS C/llJla FROM: HARVEY E. BRAGDON JT CO^ DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT >, DATE: 25 June 1993 SUBJECT: REZONING APPLICATION - 2994-RZ - Clyde Cola (Applicant & Owner) - requests approval to rezone 13,684-sq. ft. of land located in the Pacheco area, from Single Family Residential District R-10 to Single Family Residential District R-6. - =--------------------------------------------------------------------- SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATIONS) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Accept the environmental documentation prepared for this pro- ject as being complete and adequate. 2. Approve rezoning application 2994-RZ as recommended by the County Planning Commission 3. Adopt the County Planning Commission's findings as set forth in Resolution No. 27-1993 as the determination for these actions. 4. Introduce the ordinance giving effect to the aforesaid rezon- ing, waive reading and set date for adoption of same. FISCAL IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATION: The applicant on March 9, 1992, received approval for a two-lot minor subdivision, with conditions of approval requiring him to submit an application for rezoning the property from R-10 to R-6. The applicant's request was heard by the County Planning Commiss- ion on June 8, 1993. The Planning Commission, after evaluating the proposal and evidence submitted, voted unanimously to recommend approval of the proposed rezoning to the Board of Sup rvi rs. CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: YES SIGNATUR _ RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR _ RECO ND ON OF 8 D COMMITTEE _ APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE(S): ACTION OF BOARD ON APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A _ UNANIMOUS (ABSENT TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN AYES: NOES: ACTION TAKEN AND ENTERED ON THE - ABSENT: ABSTAIN: MINUTES OF THE 'BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. Orig: Community Development Department ATTESTED cc: D. Drennan PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERK OF Clyde Cola THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR BY------------------------DEPUTY NOTIFICATION LIST - Clyde A. Cola (2994-RZ) - 2 Parcels, R-10 To R-6 - Pacheco Area - Page #2 Cassandra Lee William Ng James & Florence Raab 2230 Lake Villa Court 350 Lake Brook Court 350 South Fourth Avenue Martinez, California 94553 Martinez, California 94553 Pacheco, California 94553 Randall & Mary Lee Wilson & Kit Ng James E. Reed 157 High Street 8255 Skyline Boulevard 301 Lake Dale Court Pacheco, California 94553 Oakland, California 94611 Martinez, California 94553 Keith & Nanette Leonard Richard Norris Elizabeth Rosenquist 317 Lake Dale Court 177 High Street 304 Lake Brook Court Martinez, California 94553 Pacheco, California 94553 Martinez, California 94553 Victor Linares Gerald & Virginia Occelli Jill Rubin 163 High Street 311 Lake Dale Court 341 Lake Meadow Court Pacheco, California 94553 Martinez, California 94553 Martinez, California 94553 Cliff & Vang Lura Louis & Dorothy Olsen Richard & Laurie Smith P. 0. Box 357 176 High Street 319 Lake Dale Court Concord, California 94522 Pacheco, California 94553 Martinez, California 94553 Leon & Cathleen MacDonald- Lawrence Ronald & Wendy Stevenson 325 Lake Dale Court 311 Lake Meadow Court 2355 Lake Meadow Circle Martinez, California 94553 Martinez, California94553 Martinez, California 94553 Chris & Jeanne Macko Ricardo & Jacqueline Perez Timothy Sullivan 2339 Oak Glen Circle 164 High Street 2371 Lake Meadow Circle Martinez, California 9455 Pacheco, California 94553 Martinez, California 94553 Kevin & Kathy Marker Diane Pierce Brian & Shelly Swope 315 Lake Dale Court 2381 Lake Meadow Circle 301 Lake Meadow Court Martinez, California 94553 Martinez, California 94553 Martinez, California 94553 Douglas & Deborah Morgan Elizabeth Prettyman Anna Valencia 2335 Oak Glen Circle 2375 Lake Meadow Circle 2343 Lake .Meadow Circle Martinez, California 94553 Martinez, California 94553 Martinez, California 94553 Charles Mori Ronald& Sonia Quinn Orval & Dessie Vanderburg 2354 Lakeead Qw Court 2347 Lake Meadow Circle 113 Hubbard Avenue .Martinez, a�lYornia 94553 Martinez, California 94553 Pleasant Hill, Calif. 94523 ,OTIFICATION LIST — CLYDE COLA (20,9+-P\.) — 2 PARCELS, R-10 TO E-E — PACHECO PREA. (PAGE #'1) Clyde A. Cola (Applicant/Owner) Douglas & Barbara Deane Charles & Diane Hedlund 168 High Street 321 Lake Meadow Court 335 Lake Meadow Court Pacheco, California 94553 Martinez, California 94553 Martinez, California 94553 Ida & George Alexander Loretta Denning 22 Descanso Drive 2016 Donald Drive Eugene & Lois Holt Orinda, California 94563 et Moraga, California 94556 Pacchecof, California 94553 John & Carolyn August John & Kimberly Ann Distaso 331 Lake Meadow Court Gregory & Lynda Howard Martinez, California 94553 290 Hampshire Drive 305 Lake Dale Court Plainsboro, New Jersey 08536 Martinez, California 94553 Beverley Barnes Howard Enderle Janice Joworski 305 Lake Meadow Court 1075 Village Oaks Drive 173 High Street Martinez, California 94553 Martinez, California 94553 Pacheco, California 94553 ,Mary Lou Betines Daniel & Mary Ewing Ellington M. Johnson 321 Lake Dale Court 2359 Lake Meadow Circle 159 High Street Martinez, California 94553 Martinez, California 94553 Pacheco, California 94553 Glen Boyd Robert & Carin Ferrero Andrew Jones 315 Lake Meadow Court 331 Lake Court 178 High Street Martinez, California 94553 Martinez, California 94553 Pacheco, California 94553 Joan Budne Ghomas & Coleen Geoffray Sandra Kallander 300 Lake Brook Court 156 High Street 950 North Kings Road #21 Martinez, California 94553 Pacheco, California 94553 West Hollywood, Calif. 90069 Donald & Marji Calbeck David & Patricia Glick Glen & Myume Kashiwahara 325 Lake Meadow Court 342 South 4th Avenue 345 Lake Court Martinez, California 94553 Pacheco, California 94553 Martinez, California 94553 Robert LaFleur "lyde Cola Steven & Marianne Hageman 156 Ironwood Drive 162 Ironwood Drive 2345 Oak Glen Circle Pacheco California 94553 Pacheco, California 94553 Martinez, California 94553 ' Anthony & Stephanie Daniels Thomas Hays Peter & Bonnie Landini 335 Lake Court 130 Freds Way - 220 Shantilly Court Hartinez, California 94553 Hollister, California 95023 Danville, California 94526 NOTIFICATION LIST - Clyde .A. Cola (2994-RZ) - 2 Parcels, R-10 to R-6 - Pacheco Area. Page #3 Deborah Warmus 2379 Lake Deadow Circle Martinez, California 94553 William & Barbara Wells 341 South 4th Street Pacheco, California 94553 Lars WellsSandberg 341 Lake Court Hartinez, California 94553 lobert & Peggy Wheaton 153 High Street. 'acheco, California 94553 )ennis & Josephine Wheeler 154 High Street 'acheco, California 94553 )avid & Judith Wilkins 345 Lake Meadow Circle 4artinez, California 94553 3url Williams L71 High Street 'acheco, California 94553 :heong & Grace Yee '. 0. Box 182 'acheco, California .94553 Resolution No. 27-1993 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATING FINDINGS AND . RECOMMEN- DATIONS ON THE REQUESTED CHANGE IN ZONING BY CLYDE COLA (APPLICANT/ OWNER) , (2994-RZ) , IN THE ORDINANCE CODE SECTION PERTAINING TO THE PRECISE ZONING FOR THE PACHECO AREA OF SAID COUNTY. WHEREAS, a request by CLYDE COLA (Applicant/Owner) , (2994-RZ) , to rezone two parcels from Single Family Residential District (R- 10) to Single Family Residential District (R-6) , as required by condition of approval #6 of Minor Subdivision 34-91, which application was received by the Community Development Department Office on August 17, 1992; and WHEREAS, for purposes of compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act and the State and County CEQA guidelines, the project was determined to be categorically exempt from CEQA; and WHEREAS, after notice having been lawfully given, a public hearing was scheduled before the County Planning Commission on Tuesday, June 8, 1993, whereat all persons interested therein might appear and be heard; and WHEREAS, on Tuesday, June 8, 1993 , the County Planning Commission having fully reviewed, considered and evaluated all the testimony and evidence submitted in this matter; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County Planning Commission recommends to the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa, State of California, that the rezoning request of CLYDE COLA (Applicant/Owner) , (2994-RZ) , be APPROVED for change from Single Family Residential District (R-10) to Single Family Residential District (R-6) and that this zoning change be made as is indicated on the findings map entitled: BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the reasons for this recommendat- ion are as follows: A. The general plan for the subject property is Single Family Residential-High Density with a density range of 5. 0 to 7.2 dwelling units per acre. The requested zoning to R-6 is consistent with the general plan. B. The uses within the R-10 District are compatible to those within the R-6 District. C. The subject property is within the City of Pleasant Hill's sphere of influence. The City in their comments on September 4, 1991 on MS 34-91 requested a rezoning of the property from R-10 to R-6 to conform with the property's Resolution No. 27-1993 size. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Chairman and Secretary of this Planning Commission will sign and attest the certified copy of this resolution and deliver the same to the Board of Supervisors all in accordance with the Government Code of the State of California. The instructions by the Planning Commission to prepare this resolution was given by motion of the Commission on Tuesday, June 8, 1993, by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners - Terrell, Accornero, Sakai, Woo, Gaddis, Clark, Frakes. NOES: Commissioners - None. ABSENT: Commissioners - None. ABSTAIN: Commissioners - None. I, Quintus H. Sakai, Chairman of the Planning Commission of the County of Contra Costa, State of California, hereby certify that the foregoing was duly called and held in accordance with the law on Tuesday, June 22, 1993, and that this resolution was duly and regularly passed and adopted by the following vote of the Comm- ission: AYES: Commissioners - Terrell, Clark, Woo, Accornero, Sakai. NOES: Commissioners - None. ABSENT: Commissioners - Frakes, Gaddis. ABSTAIN: Commissioners - None. Chai a fePlanning Commission, Contra Cos ay, State of California. ATTEST: Secr a of t e lanning Commission, Cont;a osta C nty, State of California. Findings Map '60EA LAK C uAT v� K r a 0 A o SOUTH CZ A/ fQUHM AVE AYE Y � +•w•� _- mac{ n E t tia Z P�aT`y G ST �.... �'�. PKWY I �� Rezone From �9-10 To 2-(o -PAC H-e-00 Area i, , Chairwoman of the Contra Costa County Planning Commission, State of California, do hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of _Pq&u„ 1-1-13 O-f= "RIE G OL "-y-1's I q-7 t 2-0 s i C_ Iy\Pr P indicating thereon the decision of the Contra Costa County Planning Commission in the matter of COLA Chair of V6e C ntra Costa County Planning CoAnmission,State of California ATTE T Sffanning ry of h ontra Costa County P Comm' Sion, State of Calif. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT Notice of Exemption Contra Costa County Community Development Department 651 Pine Street, 4th Floor - North Wing, McBrien Administration Building Martinez, CA 94553-0095 Telephone: (510) 646-2031 Contact Person: Debbie Drennan Project Description, Common Name (if any) and Location: Clyde Cola (Applicant and Owner), County File #2994-RZ: The applicant requests approval to rezone two parcels from R-10 to R-6 as required by condition of approval #6 from M. S. 34-91. The subject properties are located on the west side High Street, approximately 30 feet north of 4th Avenue, in the Pacheco area. (R-10) (ZA:H-13) (CT 3211.02) (APN 125-271-014, -015) This project is exempt from CEQA as a: Ministerial Project (Sec. 15268) Other Statutory Exemption, Section Declared Emergency (Sec. 15269(a)) General Rule of Applicability(Section 15061(b)(3)) Emergency Project (Sec. 15269(b) or (c►) XX Categorical Exemption, Class 5 Section 15305 for the following reason(s): The proposed rezoning is a minor alteration in land use to establish consistency with the general plan designation of single family residential. Date: By: Community Development Department Representative AFFIDAVIT OF FILING AND POSTING I declare that on I received and posted this notice as required by California Public Resources Code Section 21 152(c). Said notice will remain posted for 30 days from the filing date. Signature Title Applicant's Name and Address Department of Fish and Game Fee - Exempt Clyde A. Cola County Clerk Fee $25 Due Receipt # 168 High Street Pacheco, CA 94553 Agenda Item # (� Community Development Contra Costa County CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION TUESDAY, JUNE 8, 1993 - 7:30 P.M. I. INTRODUCTION CLYDE COLA (Applicant & Owner), County File #2994-RZ: The applicant requests approval to rezone two parcels from R-10 to R-6 as required by Condition of Approval #6 from MS 34-91 : Subject properties are located on the west side of High Street, approximately 30 feet north of 4th Avenue, in the Pacheco area. (R-10) (ZA: H-13) (CT 3211 .02) (Parcel #125-271-014, -015). II. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt a resolution recommending approval of the rezoning to the Board of Supervisors. III. GENERAL INFORMATION A. General Plan: Single Family Residential-High Density, 1991 County General Plan. B. Existing Zoning: R-10; 10,000.square foot minimum lot size. C. Proposed Zoning: R-6, 6,000 square foot minimum lot size. D. CEQA Status: This project is categorically exempt from CEQA. E. Site Description: The subject property is a gentle sloping parcel located in an existing high-density urban setting. IV. AGENCY COMMENTS A. Department of Fish & Game: . The Department had no comment on the application. B. Contra Costa County Fire Protection District: Roof coverings shall be a minimum Class C rating. C. Building Inspection Department: No comments. D. Pacheco Municipal Advisory Council: Comments requested, none received. 2 V. DISCUSSION The applicant was requested as a Condition of Approval #6 of MS 34-91 to submit an application for rezoning the subject property from R-10 to R-6, to establish consistency with the approved lot size of 6,000 square feet. The zoning district within the surrounding area consists of R-10, R-7 and R-6. The properties immediately adjacent to the subject property are zoned R-10 with a progression into R-7 and R-6 to the northeast and a pocket of R-6 to the southeast. .Section 26-2.1806 of County Ordinance Code requires specific findings to be made by the planing agency when a request for change in a land use district is made. They are as follows: A. The change proposed will substantially comply with the general plan; B. The uses authorized or proposed in the land use district are compatible within the district and to uses authorized in adjacent districts; C. Community need has been demonstrated for the use proposed, but this does not require demonstration of future financial success. Staff finds the following in regards to the above: A. The general plan for the subject property is Single Family Residential-High Density with a density range of 5.0 to 7.2 dwelling units per acre. The requested zoning to R-6 is consistent with the General Plan. B. The uses within the R-10 district are compatible to those within the R-6. C. The subject property is within the City of Pleasant Hill's sphere of influence. The City in their comments on September 4, 1991 on MS 34-91 requested a rezoning of the property from R-10 to R-6 to conform with the property's size. DD/aa RZXIX/2994-RZ.DD 5/20/93 � a., •�� moi.' i' i 44 Stade S `•�4:q��•�♦ +,•• yt .. ••rteCY, \ ti� ;o •� � t �f,• .t `�':� - � �•..� `- _, --.\ lam- �` ```,'` ,::�; t. cF'. � .��' ., s`"'°= tA 36 �.�`�- .rte .: .."'t'`.,,�•�'��' •_ � �"�..,, ;'.. '`` .\` - `,•.....'� ::.0�;+� �,• . 1 11 • n �^' �`'' `�� ', •� �:� �,��. ,`'::� � � pts �o, ':, 100,Res • • �: / ;_ • •t_1• � • Y"(il�' -""'•' n •.. ' � „r +"^,.. � ne '+4w� ".• `,.a.3.fice��''� -'\` •�"a •,•" • +�• CO Ia. Vo '', � •" f r �`'r�i�es 'S1ah__ 282' >l' !'`'"`�'. �c.• 'i•;.' `\ oaf cp .'� ,, -.• i, r �,� '> � r• re • t Q n q ,Oir 41 to BtA Ar 05 In Pay •� > '�``� ��='� .msµ � i '�' �� " • � .\��••,•�� .�`� � \ \'FNS:•' r , a\\ J� /.---.'-,4 'b •� ' () _ GG n 1! GOA r i( c� - Nl ��'�' ' �g�i�`•�� ,\�� • f' t �t�,�— , � M\.. � ,�s � \ACG Agenda Item # Community Development Contra Costa County CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR MONDAY, MARCH 9, 1992, 1 :30 P. M. I. INTRODUCTION CLYDE & DONNA COLA (Applicant and Owners), County File # MS 34-91: The applicant requests approval of a tentative map to subdivide 13,684 square feet into 2 parcels in a Single Family Residential District (R-10) with variances to have less than the required parcel size of 6,000 t square feet each(10,000 square feet required) and to have less than the required lot width and depth. Subject property is located on the west side of High Street, approximately 30 feet north of 4th Avenue, in the Pacheco area. (R-10) (ZA: H-13) (CT 3211.02) ( Parcel # 125-271-007). II. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the two lot minor subdivision. III. GENERAL INFORMATION A. General Plan: Single Family Residential - High Density. B. Zoning: R-10. C. CEQA: A negative Declaration has been posted for the project. D. Site Description: The subject property is a gentle sloping parcel located in an existing high-density urban setting. E. Agency Comments: 1 . Airport Land Use Commission: See attached. 2. Pacheco Town Council: No Comments. 3. City of Pleasant Hill: The City would prefer to see the property rezoned to R-6 (6,000 square foot lot size) and review to decrease the number of driveways. 4. Grading Inspection Dept: The Department recommends relocating panel (B) access to the north property line, since a small cut and access exists. This would also allow for better control of drainage. IV. STAFF DISCUSSION The applicant proposes to subdivide approximately 13,200 square feet into two lots. The proposal will create two lots below the R-10 district standard of 10,000 square feet per lot. Within the project vicinity. Three parcels have been subdivided in similar manner. Per staff's site visit and review of Grading Inspection comments, staff would concur that access to parcel - B shall be provided along the north property line, where an access currently exists. Additionally staff would recommend that access to parcel (B) be held in fee by parcel (A), to eliminate the flag lot configuration. By staff's calculations the rear property line of parcel (A) will have to be adjusted slightly to meet the 6,000 square foot parcel size, and an easement granted to parcel (B). Furthermore, the applicant's request for 6,000 square foot lots is below the R-10 District standards of the required 10,000 square feet in staff's opinion to justify the 6,000 square foot lot size the applicant should be required to rezone .the property to R-6. Previous subdivisions in the project vicinity MS 181-79 and 30-87 were permitted to subdivide below the R-10 District standards. However, the property for MS 30-87 was rezoned from R-10 to R-6 following approval. It is unclear if the approval was contingent of the rezoning. The parcels adjacent to the subject property, and two parcel distance.to the north are approximately 7,000 to 8,000 square feet. V. ROAD AND DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS: The attached conditions of approval based on the July, 1991 tentative map include road and drainage requirements. The applicant should be fully aware of the County Subdivision Ordinance Code requirements as they pertain to this development. MS34/MS 34-91.DD CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL MS 34-91 1 . This application for a two-lot minor subdivision is approved subject to a revised map being submitted for review and approval of the Community Development Department relocating the property access to the north property line and eliminating the flag-lot configuration, 2. Where a lot is located within 300 feet of a high voltage electric transmission line, the applicant shall record the following notice: "The subject property may be located near a high voltage electric transmission line. Purchasers should be aware that there is ongoing research on possible potential adverse health effects caused by the exposure to a magnetic field generated by high voltage lines. Although much more research is needed before the question of whether magnetic fields actually cause adverse health effects can be resolved, the basis for such an hypothesis is established. At this time no risk assessments have been made." When a Final Subdivision Public Report issued by the California Department of Real Estate is required, the applicant shall also request that the Department of Real Estate insert the above note in the report. 3. The applicant shall show proof that water and sewage service is available prior to .recording the Parcel Map. 4. Should archaeological materials be uncovered during grading,trenching or other on-site excavation(s), earthwork within 30 yards of these materials shall be stopped until a professional archaeologist who is certified by the Society for California Archaeology (SCA) and/or the Society of Professional Archaeologists (SOPA) has had an opportunity to evaluate the significance of the find and suggest appropriate mitigation(s), if deemed necessary. 5. Comply with the following recommendations of the Airport Land Use Commission: A. A suitable aviation and noise easement covering the entire property shall be dedicated to the County. A model ordinance for this purpose has been provided to the applicant. At least 30 days prior to filing a final map, a proposed easement instrument shall be submitted to the County Zoning Administrator for review and approval. The approved instrument shall be dedicated concurrently with the recordation of the parcel maps. B. The applicant shall prepare a disclosure statement which shall be included in any future offer or sale documents to read as follows: "This property is in proximity to Buchanan Field, a public-use airport. The property is subject to frequent aircraft overflight and associated noise impacts." The statement shall either be added to the parcel map or concurrently recorded as a covenant to each of the lots with the recordation of the parcel map. C. New residences or other new habitable structures shall be designed to comply with the Sound Transmission Control Standards of the 1988 Uniform Building Code Appendix with State of California 1989 Amendments. 6. Prior to filing the map submit an application rezoning the subject property from R-10 to R-6. 7. The Following requirements pertaining to drainage, road, and utility improvements will require the review and approval of the Public Works Department. A. In accordance with Section 92-2.006 of the County Ordinance Code, this subdivision shall conform to the provisions of the County Subdivision Ordinance (Title 9). Any exceptions therefrom must be specifically listed in this conditional approval statement. Conformance with the Ordinance includes the following requirements: 1 . Constructing road improvements along the frontage of High Street. An exception to this requirement is granted provided a deferred improvement agreement is executed requiring the owner(s) of the property involved in Subdivision MS 34-91 to: a. Construct curb,four-foot six-inch sidewalk(width measured from curb face), necessary longitudinal and transverse drainage, and necessary pavement widening along the frontage will satisfy this requirement. The face of the curb shall be 20 feet from the centerline of the road. b. Underground the existing utility distribution facilities along the High Street frontage. C. At the time the deferred improvement agreement is called up, submit improvement plans, if required, to the Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division, for review; pay the inspection fee, plan review fee and applicable lighting fees. 2. Additional street lighting is not required. This property has already been annexed to County Service Area L-100 for maintenance of street lights. 3. Undergrounding of all new utility distribution facilities. 4. Conveying all storm waters entering or originating within the subject property, without diversion and within an adequate storm drainage facility, to a natural watercourse having definable bed and banks or to an existing adequate public storm drainage facility which conveys the storm waters to a natural watercourse. 5. Designing and constructing storm drainage facilities required by the Ordinance in compliance with specifications outlined in Division 914 of the Ordinance and in compliance with design standards of the Public Works Department. The Ordinance prohibits the discharging of concentrated storm waters into roadside ditches. 6. Submitting improvement plans prepared by a registered civil engineer, payment of review and inspection fees, and security for all improvements required by the Ordinance Code or the conditions of approval for this subdivision. 7. Submitting a Parcel Map prepared by a registered civil engineer or licensed land surveyor. B. Conveying to the County, by Offer of Dedication, additional right of way on High Street as required for the planned future width of 60 feet. C. If both parcels access off the same easement, construct a 16 -foot paved private roadway to County private road standards, within a 25-foot easement, for that portion of the access road which will serve both parcels in this proposed subdivision. D. Prevent storm drainage, originating on the property and conveyed in a concentrated manner, from draining across driveways. E. Furnish proof to the Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division, of the acquisition of all necessary rights of entry, permits and/or easements for the construction of off-site, temporary or permanent, drainage improvements. ADVISORY NOTES 1. Applicant shall comply with the Park Dedication Fee Ordinance. 2. Comply with requirements of the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District(see attached). 3. Comply with requirements of the Consolidated Fire Protection District (see attached). 4. The applicant will be required to comply with the requirements of the Bridge/Thoroughfare Fee Ordinance for the Pacheco Area of Benefit as adopted by the Board of Supervisors. M34/MS34-91 c.DD 2/27/92 PW i,& �s - r� recycled paper . _ : 1 Pr f 05 City of Pleasant September 4, 1991 Ms . Debbie Drennan Community Development Department County Administration Building 651 Pine Street Martinez, CA 94553-0095 Re: M.S . 34-91 Dear Ms . Drennan: Our comments on the subject minor subdivision are as follows . The Pleasant Hill General Plan conforms to the county general plan and designates the property for high density single family residential land use. The proposed division is consistent with this designation. Our concerns are twofold. First is the fact that a number of variances are requested to the R-10 zoning which are neither warranted nor listed on the application. A rezoning to Single Family Residential District R-6 appears to be the preferred course of action. Second is the fact that there appears to be a need to evaluate the effect of future subdivisions on the circulation system and land use pattern. There is no indication this has been done. For example, driveways can be improved to serve adjacent parcels, thereby increas-Ing driveway width an%".' halving the Ii:dltthEl' Of nevi driveway connections to the public street . We suggest that this property and the adjacent properties be rezoned prior to subdivision. Sincerely, Dennis C. Mesick Senior Planner s.\shared\1etters\ccros3491.1tr 100 Gregory Lane - Pleasant Hill California 94523-3323 - (510) 671-5270 - FAX 256-8190 - i Harvey E. Bragdon .Community Contra Director of Community Development Development Costa ' Department County nou County Administration Building 651 Pine Street 4th Floor, North Wing r _-� -'�, =e -:� �-•. �• �)ts Martinez, California 94553.0095 ,•_•.: .• �'' -.: _ Phone: 646-2031 Date: " .q C04K AGENCY COMMENT REQUEST We request your comments regarding the attached application currently under review. DISTRIBUTION — Building Inspection Please submit your comments as follows: l _ Environmental Health � �� f►��f )� . 1 _P/W- Flood Control Project Planner: !� l� ✓ YYY"w»•'" P/VN- Road Engineering �� Comprehensive Planning County File No.: Archaeological Inventory Fish and GamePrior to _ Fire District ;.Iv ` Sanitary District A__ lot Water District School District Nearby City West Pittsburg A Bance We have found the following special programs _Alamo Improvement Association apply to this application: Oakley Municipal Advisory Council Kensington Municipal Advisory Council Active Fault Zone EI Sobrante Pig. & Zoning Committee Flood Hazard Area, Panel Ca unit Organizations: ( � ik_4A, t`-fQ 60 dBA Noise Control Within 2,000 feet of Hazardous Waste Site Please indicate the code section of recommendations that are required by law or ordinance. No comments on this application. Our comments are attached. 1,,A� I X/ Comments: Sig re Agency Date COMM COSTA COUNTY ISTRICT 046W ROAD ROMMIJ6110A 94=-4694 ., 1969- I- 39 L.8°M-. �}0 2- 58P.M.13 9-21 t2-? 3-90 PM. 4411-4- ay�•�, 4-99P.M.I? 12-2s-sl 5-11125 PM. 20, 8-15-84 ° 574.44.E 6- a84 LS ti oa c. ��o� \ ' N89•S4'w 145 •,� X30,1 k `4S`SJ. 00. CD '5Z�, N6 9•S4'oo'�t✓ p bd� .2lk D �9a Ne9•sa ao•w 30 4i 3p '$d 'ell 13 yJ 2 es l\ b 2! 0 0 /2 N69°5d 00'W 140 MES vas ' CA •gr-,� o � - ,,� 26 JVAc °`err F' 1u (t 4 - Zia{Ol P.B. 3 Lo 155 16 o 157 !Z 0 ass-sa� •N A°.. qz"3�1 17 Iva 1 5 �I n_trri. 5 .cc at .isr.4 2 .isc.lc. 3 ar•de r•1 b !g " C.1�95 ��y a 9 . Z% b%A-(d'z� 1.1/41 Ib6 0 �� 2\BA-Q,y 1. �Vo )o VA Q2— 90.9/ _ ik N z:7c) �� 1 -tA 1 '►o it • 118.4 �5 67.r> Nag'S4'wCHRISTEN n � r 4 TH. AVE. SOUTH w � ca - # . R FFR 2 2 Alzm �� 28