HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 12201983 - X.10 TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS t
FROM: Planning and Public Works Departments Contra
Costa
DATE: December 20, 1983 County
SUBJECT: San Ramon Area Road Improvements
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATIONS
1 ) Planning and Public Works Departments are to report to the Board of Supervisors on
January 17, 1984 with a recommendation as to the funding, including an agreement with
CALTRANS, of I-680 and Bollinger Canyon Road interchange in San Ramon Valley. No
discretionary action by staff for funding of this interchange shall be taken in the
meantime.
2) Planning and Public Works Departments are to report to the Board of Supervisors on
January 17, 1984 with a recommendation as to a program to fund identified road improve-
ments (other than I-680:Bollinger) in the Bishop Ranch, Crow Canyon Extension Corridor
and Blackhawk areas.
3) County Counsel is to provide an opinion on funding requirements as to the conditions
of approval and agreements appended to project approvals as they pertain to the I-680,
Bollinger Canyon and I-680, Norris Canyon road structures.
BACKGROUND
Supervisor Powers called upon Anthony A. Dehaesus, Director of Planning, and William R.
Gray, Chief Deputy Public Works Director, for a report on transportation issues regarding
the Bishop Ranch-Crow Canyon Extension Corridor areas. W. R. Gray reported on the CALTRANS
agreement and the need and timing of the local match and that any action by the Board of
Supervisors should be deferred until at least January 17th by which time the CALTRANS
request for funding should have arrived.
A. A. Dehaesus agreed that action on these issues should be deferred to January 17th to
await the CALTRANS request as it pertains to I-680, Bollinger and that staff further
reports as to a program to fund other road improvements in the Bishop Ranch-Crow Canyon
Road Extension Corridor. He briefly described some of the pending projects in the area.
Robert Pelletreau, an attorney representing Dame Construction Company, spoke and sug-
gested that a legal interpretation be secured regarding the Pacific Telephone conditions
of approval and the Sunset Development Company agreement.
Sanford Skaggs, an attorney representing Blackhawk Development Company, indicated agreement
with the recommendations provided by staff.
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: YES SIGNATU
RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECO MENATION BOARD COMMITTEE
APPROVE OTHER
SIGNATURE(S) G
ACTION OF BOARD ON / APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
UNANIMOUS (ABSENT -277 ) 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
AYES: NOES: AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD
OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN.
CC: Planning Department ATTESTED ..2 o. z!` 3
Public Works Department J.R. OLSSON, COUNTY CLERK
County Administrator AND EX OFFICIO CLERK OF THE BOARD
A�'J
County Counsel `.
Mee2/7-ee BY ' DEPUTY