HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 08141990 - 1.7 (2) `4 O, • Contra
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS /
FROM: Plastics Recycling Task ForceCounty
., J.
�rrA'Eu+•
DATE: August 9, 1990
SUBJECT: Preliminary Data on Plastics Wastestream .,
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S) &BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATION
" Accept the report. of the Plastics. Recycling Task Force on preliminary data on
plastics in the wastestream.
FISCAL IMPACT
None.
BACKGROUND
This item has been placed on the agenda by the Co-Chair of. the Plastics
Recycling Task Force, Supervisor Sunne McPeak. Based on national data, waste
plastic represents approximately 144 million pounds of Contra Costa County's
wastestream.
Additional data is found in the attached report.
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: _YES SIGNATURE: Harvey E. Brag on
Di-rector of Comrm m•ty Development
_RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR _RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
AMOVE OTHER
SIGNATURE(S):
ACTION OF BOARD ON AUG 14 1990 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
UNANIMOUS (ABSENT ► AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
AYES: - NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN.
ATTESTED AUG 14 1990
CC: via Community- Development PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERK OF THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
1 �vn
j155:p1a.brd' BY DEPUTY.
d
0127 A OOSIA 03utm
'PY DEVEIC04ERr DE:PAIZDMERP
TO: Board of Supervisors DATA: August 7, 1990
FEKK: Sheila Cogan
Staff, Plastics Recycling Task Force
Sa33=: Preliminary Data on Plastics Wastestream
This report was developed at the request of the Contra Costa County Plastics
Recycling Task Force in order to provide data on the amount of materials
available for recycling in the County.
National Statistics
Studies of the plastics wastestream, compiled nationally, indicate the amounts
of various resins available in the wastestream by weight and by volume. The
United States Environmental Protection Agency in its June 1990 report,
"Characterization of Municipal Solid Waste in the United States: 1990 Update,
Executive Summary", shows that on the national level, paper and paperboard
products are the largest component of municipal solid waste (MSW) by weight (40%
of generation) and yard waste is the second lamest component (roughly 18% of
generation) . Four of the remaining materials in MSW - glass, metals, plastics
and food waste - range between 7% to 9% each by weight of total MSW generated.
The data does indicate that plastics by weight represent 8.0% or 14.4 million
tons of material generated in MSW on the national level.
Measurements by volume of discards in the MSW show plastics represent 19.9% or
79.7 million cubic yards,. exceeded only by paper products representing 34.1% or
136.2 cubic yards by volume. This is followed by other materials - metals, yard
waste and food waste.
Another recent national study, conducted by Franklin Associates for the Council
on Solid Waste solutions, determined that 61% of plastic waste ends up in
municipal solid waste landfills, while the remainder is accounted for in
import-export of plastic, waste incineration and recycling. (For Contra Costa
County, this percentage would be higher as the County does not incinerate
garbage.) According to the Franklin study, the most common resins that end up
in sanitary landfills are:
IDPE - 27%
HDPE - 21%
PP - 16%
PS - 16%
PVC - 7%
Other- 13%
Franklin Associates' data also addresses the question of how much landfill
volume is taken up by various MSW components. Estimates of the volume of MSW
and selected components in trash cans and landfills shows that plastics, while
7% of landfilled MSW by weight, are approximately 18% of landfilled MSW by
volume. This data differs from the previously named EPA study.
Iocal Data
Data is currently being collected from a pilot mixed waste plastics curbside
collection program recently concluded in a 2,000 home area in the City of Walnut
Creek. In this pilot project an estimated 60-70% of the residents participated
in the program. Preliminary data estimates mixed plastic waste picked up as part
of the collection service was ccnposed of the following resins by weight: (Data
includes both rigid and non-rigid plastics.)
IDPE - 33%
HDPE - 34%
PS - 8%
PP,PVC- 3% (estimate)
Other non
plastic - 10% (estimate)
The pounds per household of plastics generated and collected have not yet been
calculated.
By comparison, the national studies indicate that HDPE, for example, represents
21% of plastics in MSW by weight, but that the same material collected at the
curb in the Walnut Creek pilot area was 34% by weight. Therefore, at the
present time, it would be difficult to use the national data derived. from
landfill studies as the basis to determine the amount of material recoverable
for recycling in Contra Costa County.
Preliminary Walnut Creek data indicates that there still remains a large
quantity of plastic materials not put out for collection in the pilot area, and
that the total quantity available in the wastestream is not being recovered.
The study carried out by Resource Management Associates is presently determining
the exact recovery rates. This information is essential for estimating how much
plastic might be available and recoverable for processing and therefore how
lanae a processing facility would be required. It will also help to determine
optimum site location, appropriate processing technology and plastics collection
and processing economics in siting a waste plastic processing facility. More
research is critical.
Initial data coming from the study indicates, for example, that there is a
higher percentage of disposable diapers in the pilot area program than the
national average. Data analysis will be concluded in about a month. At that
time, it may be possible to develop a more concrete assessment of the total
plastics wast:estream available to potential processing plant investors.
The attached chart was prepared by staff of the Task Force's Negotiating
CD=ttee and appears in a Board Order dated August 14, 1990.
Additional Data
Additional information about how plastics are collected; types of intermediate
processing, if necessary; site location(s) and economics of collection, hauling
and processing need to be determined in order to make the best decision for the
County.
csc2/ptf.mem
CURBSIDE GCQZ.F)wPICN OF RIGID PIASnC CUMOaURS
PCJITN= CCIXBMCU VC U4ES —
Household Pounds Pounds Pounds Pounds
Participation All Plastic HDPE (All) HDPE (Clear) PET
50% (152,312) 31259,477 11842,975 11507,888 654,942
60% (182,775) 31911,385 20211,577 1,809,473 785,932
70% (213,237) 41563,272 2,5801168 21111,046 916,919
80% (243,700) 5,215,180 2,948,770 2,4121630 1,047,910
90% (274,162) 5,867,067 3,317,360 21714,204 11178,897
100%(304,625) 61518,975 31685,962 31015,780 11309,887
46.3% 20.1%
Assumptions: Assumes 304,625 occupied dwelling units in Contra Costa County
and 21.4 lbs/HH/year consumer, nontoxic, plastic containers; 9.9
lbs/HH/year HDPE (clear containers) ; 12.1 lbs/HH/year HDPE (all
containers) ; 4.3 lbs/HH/year PEP containers.
Data Sources: Extrapolation of Walnut Creek pilot program data (6 month pilot
of 2000 HH's, 70% participation rate collecting 3,000 lbs PET and
8500 lbs HDPE, all) . Adjustment based on national data from
"Characterization of Plastic Production in the Municipal Solid
Waste", Council for Solid Waste Solutions, February 1990.
Caution: Volumes should be regarded as very "soft" data due to
uncertainties over the applicability of national data to Contra
Costa County arra the preliminary nature of the Walnut Creek data.
Verified data will be available for plastics with the completion
of waste characterization studies.
Note: At mi.nln=, a plastics recycling plant would need a cni.tment of
5 million pounds of plastics per year. With over 70%
participation rates, it appears that Contra Costa would meet this
volume criteria.
hl2/plastic.tbl