HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 07241990 - 1.3 y /. 3
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
FROM: J. MICHAEL WALFORD, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
DATE: July 24,1990
SUBJECT: Approving Highway 4 Widening Project, Big Break Road to Oakley Road.
Project No.: 4660-6X4014-89, Oakley Area
CP# 88-71
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATIONS) &BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
I. Recommended Action:
APPROVE Project and FIND, on the basis of the initial study and all comments received, that
there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment,
ADOPT the Negative Declaration, and
DIRECT the Public Works Director to begin right-of-way acquisition and to prepare contract
plans and specifications for construction.
DIRECT the Director of Community Development to file a Notice of Determination with the
County Clerk.
FIND that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment.
II. Financial Impact:
The estimated project cost is$510,000.00,funded by Local (AOB, Developer Contribution) (80%)
and Redevelopment Agency (20%).
Ill. Reasons for Recommendations and Background:
The project is needed to improve a lane transition and to install landscaped median islands.
Continued on Attachment: X SIGNATURE:
RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
APPROVE OTHER
I
SIGNATURE(S):
ACTION OF BOARD ON JUL 1990 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
l
f
I
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
UNANIMOUS (ABSENT 1
AYES: NOES:
ABSENT: ABSTAIN:
1 hereby certify that this Is a[rue and correct copy of
an action taken and entered on the minutes of the
RTH:drg Board of Supervisors on the data shown.
c;60�24.t7 ATTESTED: JUL 2 4 1990
PHIL BATCHELOR,Clerk of the Board
Orig. Div: Public Works (Design Division) of Supervisors and County Administrator
cc: County Administrator �Q J
PW Road Engineering JjAdd.
�— �•O�"t''
Community Development
Attn: Gus Almquist
I
I
Approving Highway 4 Widening Project, Big Break Road to Oakley Road.
July 24, 1990
Page Two
III. Reasons for Recommendations and Background Cont'd.:
The project has been determined to be in compliance with the General Plan. A Negative
Declaration of environmental significance pertaining to this project was published January 18,
1989 with no protest, and the Board has considered the negative declaration together with all
comments received during the public review period.
IV. Consequences of Negative Action:
Delay in approving the project will result in a delay of design and construction and may
jeopardize funding.
I
I
t
i
i